Backup Documents 01/31/2011 S
BCC
EAR
Meeting
BACK-UP
DOCUMENTS
January 31, 2011
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL
AGENDA
January 31,2011
9:00 AM
Growth Management Plan
2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (E.A.R.)
Adoption Hearing
Fred W. Coyle, BCC Chairman, District 4
Georgia Hiller, BCC Commissioner, District 2
Jim Coletta, BCC Vice-Commissioner, District 5, CRAB Vice-Chairman
Donna Fiala, BCC Commissioner, District 1, CRAB Chairman
Tom Henning, BCC Commissioner, District 3
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER
WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF
THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. ALL REGISTERED
SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES UNLESS THE
TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN.
COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53, AS AMENDED BY
ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS
SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT.
REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE
NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH
Page 1
January 31, 2011
EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS
PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD
UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS." PUBLIC PETITIONS ARE LIMITED TO
THE PRESENTER, WITH A MAXIMUM TIME OF TEN MINUTES.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS
BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING
THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH
THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY
ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE
PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE
COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
LOCATED AT 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112,
(239) 252-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING
IMP AIRED ARE A V AILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS'
OFFICE.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (Adoption Hearing)
Resolution 2011-24: Adopted - 3/1 (Commissioner Coletta opposed and
Commissioner Henning absent)
3. Adjourn
InQuiries conCernillf! chanl!es to the Board's al!enda should be made to the
County Manal!er's Office at 252-8383.
Page 2
January 31,2011
COLLIER COUNTY FWRlDA
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBUC HEARINGS
(j)
To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the foUong as a:
o Normal legal Advertisement
(Display Adv., location, etc.)
o Other:
**********************************************************************************************************
Originating Dept/ Div: Comprehensive Planning Section Person: Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner Date: 1212112010
Petition No. (If none, give brief description): GMP 201lEvaluation & Appraisal Report - EAR. Di S~'f
Petitioner: (Name & Address): N1A
Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) NI A
Hearing before xx BCe
BZA
Other
Requested Hearing date: Januarv 31, 2010 (Based on advertisement appearing 20 days before hearing).
Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important):
o Naples Daily News
o Other
o Legally Required
Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: See Attached
Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: N/A
Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? x Yes 0 No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 111-
138317~9100~
Reviewed by:
~~
Division Administrator or Designee
i2,2\-IU
Date
List AttlfChrnents: Advertisement (& Advertisement Map)
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating penon to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before
submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure tbat any necessary legal review, or request
for same, is submitted to County Attomey before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's ofrJCe wiU distribute
copies:
o County Manager agenda f"de: to
Clerk's Office
o Requesting Division
o Original
B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file.
*************************.*********************************************************************************
FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USIi ~ _ I 7\ 11'f\1 )
Date Received: ~ Dhte of Public hearing: ~ Date Advertised: ~~
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
KendallMarcia [MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Tuesday, December 21,20103:13 PM
Minutes and Records
Bosi, Michael; Brock, Mary; NeetVirginia; Patricia L. Morgan; RodriguezWanda; Weeks, David
BCC Advertisement Request - EAR BCC 1/31/2011 Hearing
Ad Req. Slip 2011_EAR_BCC Advertisement.docx; BCC 2011 EAR Transmittal Legal
Ad.docx; Collier_8x11_Ad_Map.pdf
Due to the holidays....
Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also provide confirmation for final approval
prior to posting in the Naples Daily News.
1 will be in the office to review the confirmation on either December 22,28,29 and/or 30'", Otherwise I am off on December 23,
and 31, 2010, as well as 1/3/2011, returning January 4,2011.
Since the ad needs to be in the paper on 1/10/2011, let's see if we can finalize this NL T than the 30b. Thank you!
Cordially,
Marcia
Happy Holidays!
Marcia H. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: marciakendall@lcolliergov.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e.. mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
Linder f-".")cridn La\"I, e-rnrdi addresses iJubLe records. if
nv~ii l:his conI-act oHice
in
Dublic
nul
1
January 31,2010 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing
Advertisina ReQuirements
Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Monday, January 10. 2010. and
furnish proof of publication to the attention of Marcia Kendall in the Land Development Services
Department, Comprehensive Plannin Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida
34104. The advertisement
and the headline in the advertisement in a type no smaller than 18 point. The
advertisement placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and
classified advertisements appear.
Please reference the followinQ on ALL Invoices:
DEPARTMENT: Land Development Services Department
(Comprehensive Planning Section)
FUND & COST CENTER: 111-138317-649100-00000
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500122420
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 068778
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a
public hearing on Monday, January 31, 2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber,
third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to consider
adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to forward to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for sufficiency review, the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SEVEN YEAR
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) FOR THE
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR
TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS (DCA) FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW ACCORDING
TO THE PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA OUTLINED IN
SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA STATUTES
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL OF COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment
are available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development
Services Department, (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development
Services Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and considered at the
public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need
a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail
East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the
meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of
County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
2
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Is/Patricia Morgan
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
3
T 46 S
T 47 ST--T4SSlT49S---'- T50S-iT51SI~52S----'
T 53 S
l
JJ'i'J
..,.
,M
-1---
I
r
N
M
~
..., \
t:
:::::J IU
0 "C ,
U x
"- ,0
"- 0
W -
.- u.
-
-
0
U
'M
1M
1 a::
!
a::
I~
a::
J~ -1
UJ
"-
IN
!OC
-----+-
1
I
- d S
M
a::
l_dCH-JJI'
UJ
-I
I,
C)
M
a::
C)
N
a::
CD
IN
!a::
I'"'
IN
'a::
1-
GUlf
O,r
, 'cO
MeJ'l.
0:1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Ann P. Jennejohn on behalf of Minutes and Records
Tuesday, December 21, 20103:41 PM
Kendall, Marcia; Minutes and Records
Basi, Michael; Brock, Mary; NeetVirginia; Patricia L. Morgan; RodriguezWanda; Weeks, David
RE: BCC Advertisement Request - EAR BCC 1/31/2011 Hearing
Happy Holidays!
There are a few dates that need to be changed.
I'll change the requirement sheet to reflect 2011 vs. 2010.
More importantly, the Resolution title reads Resolution No. 04_; although that was a good year, I don't think I
want to go back.
And also as a friendly reminder to Q.!l.....we'lI have a new Chairman on January 11, 2011 so stand-by to change all
templates!
If we could get the "signed" copy a.s.a.p. that would be fantastic!
We'll get started on the request.
Thank you and you all have a very Merry Christmas @
From: KendallMarcia r mailto: MarciaKendall@colliergov,net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3: 13 PM
To: Minutes and Records
Cc: Basi, Michael; Brock, Mary; NeetVirginia; Patricia L. Morgan; RodriguezWanda; Weeks, David
Subject: Bee Advertisement Request - EAR Bee 1/31/2011 Hearing
Due to the holidays....
Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also provide confirmation for final approval
prior to posting in the Naples Daily News.
I will be in the office to review the confirmation on either December 22,28,29 and/or 30th, Otherwise I am off on December 23,
and 31, 2010, as well as 1/3/2011, returning January 4,2011.
Since the ad needs to be in the paper on 1/10/2011, let's see if we can finalize this NL T than the 30"'. Thank you!
Cordially,
Marcia
1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
KendallMarcia [MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:47PM
Minutes and Records
Bosi, Michael; Brock, Mary; Neetvirginia; Patricia L. Morgan; RodriguezWanda; Weeks, David
FW: BCC Advertisement Request - EAR BCC 1/31/2011 Hearing
Ad Req. Slip 2011_EAR_BCC Advertisement.docx; BCC 2011 EAR Transmittal Legal
Ad.docx; Collier_8x11_Ad_Map.pdf
3'd times a charm folks......
again... .Sorry for the confusion! Correction was made to change RESOLUTION Title to match that approved by Heidi Ashton-
Cicko. This version of the ad is now correct! See below attachments.
From: KendallMarcia
Sent: Tuesday, December 21,20103:13 PM
To: (minutesandrecords@c1erk.collier.fl.us)
Cc: BosiMichael; BrockMary; NeetVirginia; Patricia. Morgan@Clerk. Collier. FI. Us (Patricia.Morgan@c1erk.collierJl.us);
RodriguezWanda; WeeksDavid
Subject: BCC Advertisement Request - EAR BCC 1/31/2011 Hearing
Due to the holidays....
Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also provide confirmation for final approval
prior to posting in the Naples Daily News.
I will be in the office to review the confirmation on either December 22,28,29 and/or }oth. Otherwise I am off on December 2-3,
and 31, 2010, as well as 1/3/2011, returning January 4,2011.
Since the ad needs to be in the paper on 1/10/2011, let's see if we can finalize this NL T than the 30"'. Thank you!
Cordially,
Marcia
Happy Holidays!
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
[mail: man:iakendall@colliergQv.net
1
January 31, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing
Advertisina Requirements
Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Monday. January 10. 2010. and
furnish proof of publication to the attention of Marcia Kendall in the Land Development Services
Department, Comprehensive Plannin Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida
34104. The advertisement
and the headline in the advertisement in a type no smaller than 18 point. The
advertisement placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and
classified advertisements appear.
Please reference the followinQ on All Invoices:
DEPARTMENT: land Development Services Department
(Comprehensive Planning Section)
FUND & COST CENTER: 111-138317-649100-00000
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500122420
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 068778
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a
public hearing on Monday, January 31, 2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber,
third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to consider
adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to forward to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for sufficiency review, the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment
are available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development
Services Department, (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development
Services Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and considered at the
public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need
a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to partiCipate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail
East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the
meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of
County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
2
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Is/Patricia Morgan
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
3
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Ann P. Jennejohn
Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1 :09 PM
Naples Daily News Legals
GMP 2011 EAR Legal Notice for Jan 31,2011 BCC Mtg. (Display W/Map)
Adopting 2011 EAR Memo(1-31-11 ).doc; Adopting 2011 EAR (1-31-11 ).doc; 2011 EAR
Adoption (1-31-11 ).pdf
Good Afternoon,
Please advertise the attached DISPLAY NOTICE (W/MAP) on Monday. January 10. 2011.
Thank you.
Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board
Collier County Minutes & Records Dept.
239-252-8406
239-252-8408 (Fax)
1
Acct #068778
December 29, 2010
Attn: Legals
Naples News Media Group
1100 lmmokalee Road
Naples, Florida 34112
Re: Adopting the 2011 EAR to the GMP (Display Ad w/Map)
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced notice (w/map) Monday, January 10, 2011
and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in triplicate, together with charges
involved, to this office.
This will be a Display Ad. I have attached a MAP that is to accompany the
advertisement.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ann J ennej 000,
Deputy Clerk
P.O. #4500122420
December 29,2010
Attn: Legals
Naples Media Group
1100 Immokalee Road
Naples, Florida 34110
October 22, 2010
Attn: Leqals@Naplesnews.com
January 31, 2011 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing
Advertisina Requirements
Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Mondav. Januarv 10, 2011. and
provide the Affidavit of Publication, in TRIPLICATE, together with char es involved to the
Boards Minutes and Records Department. The advertisement
and the headline in the advertisement in a type no
smaller than 18 point. The advertisement placed in that portion of the newspaper
where legal notices and classified advertisements appear.
Please reference the followina on ALL Invoices:
DEPARTMENT: Land Development Services Department
(Comprehensive Planning Section)
FUND & COST CENTER: 111-138317-649100-00000
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500122420
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 068778
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a
public hearing on Monday, January 31, 2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber,
third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to consider
adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to forward to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for sufficiency review, the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment
are available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development
Services Department, (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development
Services Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and considered at the
public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need
a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail
East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the
meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of
County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: IslPatricia Morgan
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
~ -,----
T 46 S
----:r47s-~i 485T T 49 S~-T5os-T-T51S~ T 52 S 1-T53S [--1
'"
""
0:: ::n
+'
c:
::::J IU :;;1
"" 0 "0
"" U I
0:: ~
~ 0
w -
.- u. " I
- c
- ~
N 0 i,
""
0:: U
M
0::
JdUI]H
CJ
""
--- -I
11
I
I
u.J
'n
m
- d ~)
0::
en
N
"
f-
0::
00
N
,0::
- I - --
?Jl
u.J
r-
N
0::
u.J
co
N
0::
L!'l
N
0::
GuLf
oj
. '0
M eX lC
o ~I
l_
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
postmaster@collierclerk.com
Wednesday, December 29,20101 :09 PM
Ann P. Jennejohn
Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
ATT240806.txt; GMP 2011 EAR Legal Notice for Jan 31,2011 BCC Mtg. (Display W/Map)
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status
notifications may not be generated by the destination.
legals@naplesnews.com
1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ann P. Jennejohn
Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1 :15 PM
Kendall, Marcia
RE: BCC Evaluation & Appraisal Report Adoption Advertisement sent 12/21/2010
Hi Marcia,
r will send you the "proof" on that BCC Mtg/Display Ad. the minute r get it from NDN.
Hopefully that will be soon!
Ann
From: KendallMarcia [mailto: MarciaKendall@colliergov.netl
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 8:57 AM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Cc: Patricia L. Morgan
Subject: RE: Bee Evaluation & Appraisal Report Adoption Advertisement sent 12/21/2010
Good Morning Ann,
Trust you had a wonderful Christmas and somehow kept warm though it all!
This is to follow up my emails from last Wednesday regarding the E.A.R./BCC Advertisement! Sorry for any confusion
I may have caused with the three emails (third being the correct version, finally!)
As soon as you receive confirmation from NDN, please forward to me for review. "Thank you" for your assistance!
Cordially,
Marcia
Happy Holidays!
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: l11ilrciakendal1@_coll1ergQv.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a pnblic records
request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Heredia, Blanca [BEHeredia@Naplesnews.com]
Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:38 AM
Ann P. Jennejohn
RE: GMP 2011 EAR Legal Notice for Jan 31,2011 BCC Mtg. (Display W/Map)
Ok
Blanca E. Heredia
Naples News Media Group
Classified, Display Ad, Online and Circulation Specialist
Ph: 239-263-4710
Fax: 239-263-4703 (attn. Blanca)
Reminder: Our free ad policy allows you to run your ad for 7 days at NO CHARGE to you!
From: Ann P. Jennejohn rmailto:AnnJenneiohn@collierclerk.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29,2010 1:09 PM
To: Legals NDN
Subject: GMP 2011 EAR Legal Notice for Jan 31, 2011 Bee Mtg. (Display W/Map)
Good Afternoon,
Please advertise the attached DISPLAY NOTICE (W/MAP) on Monday. January. 2011.
Thank you.
Ann J ennejohn, Deputy Clerk
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board
Collier County Minutes & Records Dept.
239-252-8406
239-252-8408 (Fax)
Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com
This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not
be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or
take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message.
Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailingheIDdesk(Cilcollierclerk.com
quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility
for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to
a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ann P. Jennejohn
Thursday, December 30, 2010 11 :30 AM
Kendall, Marcia
RE: EAR Display Ad for BCC Mtg
I received an "o.k." but they haven't sent a copy of the ad yet.
I just got off the phone with the paper and they're working on it but may not have the proof until later today,
possibly tomorrow.
She said a spot has been reserved for the display ad on Jan 10th; all of the necessary paperwork has been
submitted.
Because they do whatever they do by publication date, they are finishing up on deadlines for papers
that are being published in the next few days vs. something that won't go to print for another week.
She assured me she doesn't foresee any problems.
Ann
***
As I mentioned on the phone, I'll ask Trish to (please) meticulously go over the ad to
make sure everything looks perfect and you'll have the proof as soon as you get back.
Enjoy your holiday and I'll talk to you next year ***
From: Kenda IIMarcia [mailto: MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 11:01 AM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Subject: RE: EAR Display Ad for Bee Mtg
Importance: High
Ann,
If you haven't done so already, please contact Naples Daily News and find out where we are in the process. Thank
you!
Cordially,
Marcia
, HA PPy
~ '1:;* ()
\" iV!!! '\
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
1
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: marciakendall@colliergov.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records
request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:AnnJennejohn@collierclerk.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:50 AM
To: KendallMarcia
Subject: RE: EAR Display Ad for Bee Mtg
Sounds good @
Ann
From: KendallMarcia [mailto:MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:09 AM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Cc: Basi, Michael
Subject: RE: EAR Display Ad for Bee Mtg
HiAnn!
My day ends at 3:45 p.m., sorry I missed your email.
If you do not receive any response by 11:00 please do contact them. I need to get this completed before I take my
leave at 3:45 p.m. today! Thank you again for your assistance! Standing by... ..
Cordially,
Marcia
,H~pPy
t... r\:...!ll.' [)
\" \,,(1 f\.
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: marciakendall@colliergov.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records
request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:AnnJennejohn@collierclerk.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29,20104:55 PM
To: KendallMarcia
Subject: EAR Display Ad for Bee Mtg
Hi Marcia,
Just wanted you to know I haven't heard back from NDN; but I'm
sure we'll get the "proof" on the display notice in the morning.
You're in the office tomorrow and so am too; I'll send an inquiry to
NDN if we haven't received the proof by 11:00 am tomorrow.
Is that alright or would you prefer I call someone right now?
Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board
Collier County Minutes & Records Dept.
239-252-8406
239-252-8408 (Fax)
Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com
This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not
be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or
take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message.
Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailingheIDdesk@lcollierclerk.com
quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility
for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to
a publiC records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
in
a
3
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kendall Marcia [MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Thursday, December 30, 2010 11 :28 AM
Ann P. Jennejohn
Bosi, Michael
RE: EAR Display Ad for BCC Mtg
Per our conversation, confirmation is not available at this time. However a place holder has been made for January
10,2011 for the ad to appear.
As soon as the confirmation is forwarded to you, you will verify its accuracy and email the confirmation to me as
soon as it is available. Thanks again Ann!
Cordially,
Marcia
>> HA ppy
~ ,I{;,@.:;;
\~ ',rt
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: marciakendall@colliergov.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records
request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
From: KendallMarcia
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 11:01 AM
To: 'Ann P. Jennejohn'
Subject: RE: EAR Display Ad for Bee Mtg
Importance: High
Ann,
If you haven't done so already, please contact Naples Daily News and find out where we are in the process. Thank
you!
1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Heredia, Blanca [BEHeredia@Naplesnews.com]
Monday, January 03, 2011 3:07 PM
Ann P. Jennejohn
FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
678185075.pdf
Importance:
High
Hello, sorry about that I thought this was done last week. Here you go.
Blanca E. Heredia
Naples News Media Group
Classified, Display Ad, Online and Circulation Specialist Ph : 239-263-4710 Fax: 239-263-4703 (attn. Blanca)
Reminder: Our free ad policy allows you to run your ad for 7 days at NO CHARGE to you!
-----Original Message-----
From: ccushman@naplesnews.com fmai Ito:ccushman@naplesnews.coml
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:59 PM
To: Legals NDN
Subject: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
678185075
This is a proof for your review. Please double check dates, prices, addresses, and phone numbers and all other
important information. Contact your sales rep with any changes.
Thank you.
1
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Ann P. Jennejohn
Monday, January 03,2011 3:16 PM
Kendall, Marcia
FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
678185075.pdf
Importance:
High
Hi Marcia,
Attached is the January 10 (Display) Ad - Legal Notice for the Board's January 31, 2011 Meeting.
Please review at your earliest convenience and send me your approval.
Thank you.
Ann
-----Original Message-----
From: Heredia, Blanca rmailto:BEHeredia@Naplesnews.coml
Sent: Monday, January 03,2011 3:07 PM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Subject: FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
Importance: High
Hello, sorry about that I thought this was done last week. Here you go.
Blanca E. Heredia
Naples News Media Group
Classified, Display Ad, Online and Circulation Specialist Ph : 239-263-4710 Fax: 239-263-4703 (attn. Blanca)
Reminder: Our free ad policy allows you to run your ad for 7 days at NO CHARGE to you!
-----Original Message-----
From: ccushman@naplesnews.com rmai Ito:ccushman@naplesnews.coml
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:59 PM
To: Legals NDN
Subject: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
678185075
This is a proof for your review. Please double check dates, prices, addresses, and phone numbers and all other
important information. Contact your sales rep with any changes.
Thank you.
1
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO
CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Monday, January 31,
2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor, Col-
lier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to con-
sider adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence
at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to for-
ward to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for sufficiency
review, the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the Growth Man-
agement Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION
AND APPRAISAL REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND APPROVING THE
TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of
the proposed amendment are available for inspection at the Land
Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na-
ples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should
be directed to the Land Development Services Department, (239-252-
2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development Services
Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and
considered at the publiC hearing.
ColII&r County
Florid..
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County
Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter consid-
ered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceed-
ing, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim re-
cord of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in
order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to
you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier
County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami
Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least
two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hear-
ing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Of-
fice.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Is/Patricia Morgan Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
No. 678185075
Januarv 1 O. 2011
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
KendallMarcia [MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:23 AM
Ann P. Jennejohn
Patricia L. Morgan; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda
RE: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
BCC 2011 EAR Transmittal Legal Ad.docx
Ann,
I did see twO things that need revision in the second paragraph, and I have highlighted the changes in yellow.
Please see that these changes are incorporated. Once made, the ad may go to the paper as shown. Please send
changed confirmation of the advertisement to me at your earliest convenience.
P.S. My apology for not catching this before, but it is critical the change be made. Thank you!
Cordially,
Marcia
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: marciakendall@colliergov.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by
telephone or in writing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann P. Jennejohn fmailto:Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.coml
Sent: Monday, January 03,2011 3:16 PM
To: KendallMarcia
Subject: FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
Importance: High
Hi Marcia,
Attached is the January 10 (Display) Ad - Legal Notice for the Board's January 31, 2011 Meeting.
Please review at your earliest convenience and send me your approval.
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a
public hearing on Monday, January 31, 2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber,
third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to consider
adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to forward to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report
~F~.~I~I to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment
are available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development
Services Department, (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development
Services Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and considered at the
public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need
a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail
East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the
meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of
County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
2
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: IslPatricia Morgan
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
3
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Ann P. Jennejohn
Tuesday, January 04,2011 9:11 AM
Naples Daily News Legals
'Heredia, Blanca'
Legal Notice 678185075
2011 EAR Adoption2.doc; 2011 EAR Adoption (1-31-11 ).pdf
Attached is Display Notice 678185075 with a few words taken out and/or replaced with others.
After reviewing 678185075 the Planner that the notice insisted they be added.
The changes she made are Ijll'~lil~i' and in on what is attached
I also attached the map that is to accompany the ad. (the first map was fine, though)
Please let me know if you need anything else.
I apologize for the inconvenience.
Thank you.
Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board
Collier County Minutes & Records Dept.
239-252-8406
239-252-8408 (Fax)
1
Acct #068778
January 4,2010
Attn: Legals
Naples News Media Group
1100 Immokalee Road
Naples, Florida 34112
Re: Adopting the 2011 EAR to the GMP (Display Ad w/Map)
Dear Legals:
Please advertise the above referenced notice (w/map) Monday, January 10,2011
and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in triplicate, together with charges
involved, to this office.
This will be a Display Ad. I have attached a MAP that is to accompany the
advertisement.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ann J ennej 000,
Deputy Clerk
P.O. #4500122420
January 4, 2010
Attn: Legals
Naples Media Group
1100 Immokalee Road
Naples, Florida 34110
October 22, 2010
Attn: Leqals@Naplesnews.com
January 31, 2011 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing
AdvertisinQ Reauirements
Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Mondav. Januarv 10. 2011, and
provide the Affidavit of Publication, in TRIPLICATE, together with char es involved to the
Boards Minutes and Records Department. The advertisement
and the headline in the advertisement in a type no
smaller than 18 point. The advertisement placed in that portion of the newspaper
where legal notices and classified advertisements appear.
Please reference the followinQ on ALL Invoices:
DEPARTMENT: Land Development Services Department
(Comprehensive Planning Section)
FUND & COST CENTER: 111-138317-649100-00000
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500122420
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 068778
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a
public hearing on Monday, January 31, 2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber,
third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to consider
adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to forward to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report
~1;;11~I.J to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment
are available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe
Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development
Services Department, (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development
Services Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and considered at the
public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need
a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail
East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the
meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of
County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
2
By: Is/Patricia Morgan
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
3
IT 4651
T 48S~-49ST-T50---s-r
IH
T 52 S r'-- T 53 S
I-
I
I
T 47 S
T 51 S
^Hmo:~,
I
----t-- - ------
....
cry
cc
::n
+'
t:
j ra
0 "'C
U L.
L. 0 ;=:,
W - ,)
.- \L
-
-
0
U
cry
cry
cc
W
IN
M
cc
7
,-,
U
-
M
CC
I
~ -~
I
0
M
CC
W
OJ
N
CC
m
00 ~
N "
CC
JJl
W
......
N
CC
~
L
~
w
CD
N
cc
In
N
cc
C 'iLL f
oj
. 0
NfC):'lC
o
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Heredia, Blanca [BEHeredia@Naplesnews.com]
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:45 AM
Ann P. Jennejohn
FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
678185075.pdf
The changes have been made...... please reply with okay to print if that's correct.
Thank you,
Blanca E. Heredia
Naples News Media Group
Classified, Display Ad, Online and Circulation Specialist Ph : 239-263-4710 Fax: 239-263-4703 (attn. Blanca)
Reminder: Our free ad policy allows you to run your ad for 7 days at NO CHARGE to you!
-----Original Message-----
From: ccushman@naplesnews.com rmai Ito:ccushman@naplesnews.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 04,201110:42 AM
To: Legals NDN
Subject: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
Here is the revised proof with changes of Ad#678185075
1
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO
CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Monday, January 31,
2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor, Col-
lier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to con-
sider adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence
at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to for-
ward to the Florida Department of Community Affairs the adoption
of the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR.) to the Growth
Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION
AND APPRAISAL REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND APPROVING THE
TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of
the proposed amendment are available for inspection at the Land
Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na-
ples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should
be directed to the Land Development Services Department, (239-252-
2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development Services
Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and
considered at the public hearing.
Collltir County
Florida
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County
Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter consid-
ered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceed-
ing, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim re-
cord of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in
order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to
you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier
County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami
Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least
two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hear-
ing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Of-
fice.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: IslPatricia Morgan Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
No. 678185075
Januarv 1 O. 2011
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
KendallMarcia [MarciaKendall@colliergov.net]
Tuesday, January 04,2011 12:14 PM
Ann P. Jennejohn
FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
678185075.pdf
OK! Please proceed with publication! Thank you!
Cordially,
Marcia
Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner
Growth Management Division
Land Development Services Department
Comprehensive Planning Section
Phone: 239.252.2387
EFax: 239.252.6675
Email: marciakendall@colliergov.net
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by
telephone or in writing.
-----Original Message---n
From: Ann P. Jennejohn rmailto:Ann.Jenneiohn@collierclerk.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 201112:01 PM
To: KendallMarcia
Subject: FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
For your approval; please review the attached w/changes.
Thank you.
Ann
-----Original Message-----
From: Heredia, Blanca rmai lto: BEHeredia@Naplesnews.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 04,201110:45 AM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Subject: FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
The changes have been made...... please reply with okay to print if that's correct.
Thank you,
Blanca E. Heredia
Naples News Media Group
1
Classified, Display Ad, Online and Circulation Specialist Ph :
239-263-4710 Fax: 239-263-4703 (attn. Blanca)
Reminder: Our free ad policy allows you to run your ad for 7 days at NO CHARGE to you!
-----Original Message-----
From: ccushman@naplesnews.com rmai Ito:ccushman@naplesnews.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 04,201110:42 AM
To: Legals NDN
Subject: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
Here is the revised proof with changes of Ad#678185075
Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com
This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privi leged information intended solely for the named
addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the
intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information
contained in this message.
Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the
Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the
Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached
documents. The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or
use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by
telephone or in writing.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by
telephone or in writing.
2
Ann P. Jennejohn
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ann P. Jennejohn
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12: 17 PM
'Heredia, Blanca'
RE: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
OKAY - PLEASE PRINT
And thank you so much for making those revisions!
Ann
-----Original Message-----
From: Heredia, Blanca rmailto:BEHeredia@Naplesnews.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 04,201110:45 AM
To: Ann P. Jennejohn
Subject: FW: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
The changes have been made...... please reply with okay to print if that's correct.
Thank you,
Blanca E. Heredia
Naples News Media Group
Classified, Display Ad, Online and Circulation Specialist Ph : 239-263-4710 Fax: 239-263-4703 (attn. Blanca)
Reminder: Our free ad policy allows you to run your ad for 7 days at NO CHARGE to you!
-----Original Messagenn-
From: ccushman@naplesnews.com rmai Ito:ccushman@naplesnews.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 04,201110:42 AM
To: Legals NDN
Subject: 678185075 BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
Here is the revised proof with changes of Ad#678185075
1
NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Published Daily
Naples. FL 341 J 0
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
Counties of Collier and Lee
Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally
appeared Kim Pokarney, who on oath says that she serves as
the Accounting Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily
newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida;
distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the
attached copy of the advertising, being a
PUBLIC NOTICE
in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE
was published in said newspaper
on January 10,2011
time in the issue
Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper
puhlished at Naples. in said Collier County, Florida. and that the said
newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier
County. Florida: distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida.
each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post
office in Naples. in said Collier County, Florida. for a period of I
year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advenisement: and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor
promised any person. finn or corporation any discount. rebate.
commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advenisement for
publication in the said spaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This 12th day ofJanuary, 2011
'KahJ f( W
(Signature of notary pu he)
~~:;~'" KAROL E KANGAS
o:',./~
.. ('> ~ Notary Public. State of Florida
~~ .":j My Comm. Expires Jul 29, 2013
""'~:~CJF "c~~" Commission # 00 912237
II,U"U"
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 11, 2011
To:
Marcia Kendall, Senior Planner
Comprehensive Planning
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Resolution 2011-24
Enclosed please find one certified (1) copy of the above
referenced documents approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on Tuesday, January 31, 2011.
If you have any questions, please call me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosure
RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 24
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Chapter 163.3191 (1), Florida Statutes (2010), requires each local
government, as part of the continuous and ongoing comprehensive planning process, to prepare
every seven (7) years an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) has designated the Collier
County Planning Commission (CCPC) as the local planning agency pursuant to Chapter
163.3174, Florida Statutes, to conduct the evaluation and appraisal process of the Growth
Management Plan and to prepare recommendations regarding the adoption of an EAR prior to
the submittal to the DCA; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) held an EAR
workshop on August 11, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held EAR workshops on
August 25,2010 and August 27,2010; and
WHEREAS, the EAC held a public hearing on November 3, 2010 and made its
recommendation of approval of the EAR to the BCC; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
December 7,2010 and made its recommendation of approval of the EAR to the BCC.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1) The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts the EAR and approves the
transmittal of the adopted EAR of the Collier County Growth Management Plan
for sufficiency review to the DCA; and
2) The Board of County Commissioners requests that DCA review the Collier
County EAR and issue a finding of sufficiency; and
3) County staff is directed to prepare the EAR-based amendments and submit them
for review by the Collier County Planning Commission and appropriate advisory
Page 1 of 2
Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2011
bodies to enable transmittal of the EAR-based amendments within 18 months
after the EAR is determined to be sufficient by DCA.
. . This Resolution adopted this 3 I <4ay of ~, 2011 after motion, second and
maJonty vote. 0 J
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E1' ~R.-OCK, CLERK
..,'l~\ .S,"....'''' '"l(.
,..... ,;,.,~'''' :" "J',:) r,_'!fJ ; >.
....~~. ":',~'.":',,~:, ~~',"
f';"'," ",;,.'.":}'..',::..~.'.'\~.~.". ~~~C
0..". ,:. ',' ,.' . . ~
. - .' .
" '.. . ......... '"l
"'2'}"te~lt . '~~~~~Y~hn"k~
1--;, :,~ 1'gna~,'Cff,( "
;!;.;;< "X;;':',;":::!~>'
Approved 'as to form
and legal sufficiency:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: ~W. c+
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Uo
Hel i Ashton-Cicko
Assistant County Attorney
Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation
CP\lO-CMP-00787\3
Item# qtz,
Agendal J J, 3'21l \ " ~
Date ~
~\
Page 2 of 2
Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2011
Collier County
2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report
EAR - BeC Adoption Edition
January 31 , 2011
.
..
to
... I .... I u.. I
---
fUlU.. LA. ..1 MA'
cae.... CcuM.r flonda
! S'u:",;..~~~'t.:r=::-ue- !
l=~::~::-_~_~.'~--: I
... I ...
I ...
I ... I .... I
-
I!!!.-:...-=-
:!I~-
::='-=::=1__
!:u:=-
ia.'.........
il~--
.
..
..
..
... I ...
I~
()---
11----
, IJII----
I =r_"':.w:._
~.....--.
1Br--
E:=r-=----
!!&-~
---
--
1IIIiI'__
-
!i~~-
; L.~~.:;;s..-_~_=__==_.__
-_........~-_._. ,,---^I!",~,~--,-,,-- .-._.,..._._~"_.~_.._'
i '~ '
i ~': 1 ,- ----->~I =~::- =
,-"---, - 'I -:--:, ..
j : - - .
1 - ~ -- .
I ~ ~ -
-..-..~
.
:I
to
....'-
0....-..---......
ii____
--.
Q--
---
i==-=--
a-- .
o --- &:
---
:==.:...
- .. ~-..&.............
)1/----
::I ......._
----
- =---
.~
1
C
...
&:
.
.
:I
...
.. · I '111 I , .. I I . I. I I . . ','" i"" . III I . .. I . ... I
J
(,
~
I
I
I I ~__~___.
\. ~-- >
----- I
I .\4 ----____ . . ~
i ---~l~
\>_~c
00-
-
-
.
.
..
.
:I
...
..
II
~
c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommend that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCe) approve a
resolution adopting the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier
County Growth Management Pian for transmittal to the Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) for sufficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in
Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan.
OBJECTIVE: 1bat the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve a
resolution adopting the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for
sufficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida
Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan.
CONSIDERATIONS: The periodic amendment process, which occurs once every seven years,
as described in Chapter 163.3191, F.S., is a two-phase process referred to as the Evaluation &
Appraisal Report (EAR). The EAR evaluates the performance of the various Elements of the
local government comprehensive plan since the previous EAR-based amendments. It assesses
the successes and shortcomings of the various Goals, Objectives, and Policies included within
the GMP and designates Objectives and Policies which need revisions, modifications or
deletions. Additionally, the EAR is the primary means by which the local plan can respond to
changes in federal, state or regional planning requirements. It should be noted that for the 2004
to 2010 evaluation period for the 2011 EAR, there have been 57 GMP amendments processed by
the County. While not all of these amendments were sent to the Department of Community
Affairs for adoption, they were either publicly or privately submitted for processing and
evaluation. A fact that recognizes the contemplation on the County's part of what improvements
are need to assure the GMP is an effective blueprint for guiding future growth, but also
accentuates the need for the comprehensive review of the GMP to ensure there is agreement
within the Plan's individual elements.
Ultimately, the Objectives and Policies designated for adjustment in the EAR become the basis
of proposed amendments to the local government comprehensive plan, the second phase of the
process. These EAR-based amendments, as reviewed by the Environmental Advisory Council
(EAC) and Planning Commission (PC), and subsequently adopted by the BCC, after found in
compliance with the Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., then become part of the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of the GMP until the next EAR is prepared in seven years.
The adoption of the EAR is the first part of a two prong process, during which areas of the GMP
are evaluated for their effectiveness and if appropriate designated for adjustment or change. The
exact specificity of that change is not determined during this first prong of the process, only that
a change is needed within the various Elements, Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the GMP. Post
adoption of the EAR by the BCC is when the specifics of the changes called out for in the EAR
are composed and refined through the GMP EAR amendment adoption process. The County will
have eighteen months from the date or the EAR adoption by the Bee to adopt the changes
Page 11 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BeC Adoption Public Hearing
designated by the EAR. Understanding this bifurcated process provides a clear direction for what
is being asked of the EAC during the EAR workshop.
At the completion of the EAR August workshops (EAC - August 11 and CCPC August 25 &
27), staff presented the post workshop EAR books to the Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) and the various other state reviewing agencies. In late October the County received the
review comments which have been attached as exhibit "A" to the CCPC staff report within the
EAR Adoption book. The majority of the comments from the DCA focus upon the need for
further data and analysis regarding the major issues and their inter-relationship to the specific
goals of the GMP's various elements, as well as the effectiveness of the elements as they relate
to the major issues. The BCC EAR Adoption books have been updated to address the specific
comments contained in the courtesy review letters.
In lieu of a lengthy summary of the changes made to the EAR draft document, a summary memo
of the proposed changes has been provided (Exhibit "A") for review and consideration. Please
note that staff has modified the EAR in other areas to provide additional clarity, but the summary
memorandum only addresses modifications of substantive nature.
ORGANIZATION OF THE EAC-EAR ADOPTION BOOK: The presented 2011 EAC-
EAR book is organized into a single-bound report containing an introduction and three (3) major
chapters. These chapters are:
Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified
Chapter Two - Countywide Assessment
Chapter Three -Evaluation of Major Issues
Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified details the issues that were brought to the
process from the public during the "Public Participation" portion of the EAR process. Chapter
Two - Countywide Assessment is the individual review of each Element and Sub-Element of the
GMP and the Goals, Objectives and Policies that comprise each of those Elements or Sub-
Elements. Chapter Three - Evaluation of Major Issues are the issues agreed upon between the
County and the DCA. Chapter One and Chapter Three are both connected within Chapter
Two. (Bolded for emphasis) Within each Element reviewed within Chapter Two, staff has
referenced Objectives and Policies that are directly related to Chapters One and Three. For
example a public comment that is directly linked to Policy 1.6.1 of the Recreation and Open
Space Element (ROSE) will be recognized within Chapter Two, as well as Chapter One.
Additionally, Objectives and Policies that are directly related to a major issue will be specified
within Chapter Three, as well as within the Element review contained within chapter Two.
As described above the structure of the EAR inter-relates all of the chapters contained in the
report. Within each of these elements, the pertinent comments from the workshops and adoption
hearings with the EAC and the CCPC have been applied to the related objective or policy, to
provide identification of both bodies' perspective, as well as comments offered by the general
public. Unlike the EAR workshop edition books, the EAR adoption edition does not contain the
evaluation of every policy and objective within the GMP, but rather only the objective and
policies within the various elements in which modifications are being suggested are included. It
Page 12 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing
should be noted that within a few policies the CCPC and the EAC have taken differing positions,
these areas will be highlighted during the EAR adoption hearing and will be presented to the
BCC for fInal arbitration on the issue. These policies are highlighted in Exhibit "B" of the
executive summary.
FISCAL IMPACT: County staff undertook the preparation of the EAR in-house. The
Comprehensive Planning Department prepared the EAR with input and cooperation from
numerous county divisions and departments. Direct and indirect costs have not been calculated
for the preparation of the EAR.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Pursuant to section 163.3 1 87(6)(a), Florida Statutes,
''No local government may amend its comprehensive plan after the date established by the state
land planning agency for adoption of its evaluation and appraisal report unless it has submitted
its report or addendum to the land planning agency as prescribed by section 163.3191 . . . "
Therefore, timely action by the BCC adopting the EAR is necessary in order for the
consideration of future comprehensive amendments. Otherwise, Collier County will be imposed
with the aforementioned statutory sanction that would prohibit amending its comprehensive plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC): The recommendations by the EAC
from its November 3, 2010 EAR adoption public hearing was for the BCC to adopt the 2011
EAR as modified by the EAC and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs.
PLANNING COMMSSION RECOMMENDA nON (CCPC): The recommendations by the
CCPC from its December 7, 2011 EAR adoption public hearing was for the BCC to adopt the
2011 EAR as modifIed by the CCPC and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners (BCC); review the numerous changes recommended by the EAC and the CCPC,
provide direction upon the individual polices in which there is conflicting recommendations from
the EAC, CCPC and staff (exhibit "B") and approve a resolution adopting the seven year
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan for
transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for sufficiency review according to
the procedures and criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and
Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan.
Page I 3 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing
Prepared By: ~ ~ .-.--,. Date:
Michael Bosi, AICP, Planning Manager
Comprehensive Planning Section
RmewedBy: ~. :~~
W'i iam D. Lorenz; r., P.E., rrector
Land Development Services Department
Date:
ApprovedBy: ~~ Date:
Nick Casalan' eputy Administrator
Growth Management Division
(-O~-l/
'0 1- c 4- - "Z..ol(
I ~J-- I{
Page 14 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
EXHIBIT "A"
Goals, Objective and Policies: All Elements will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all
Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below:
Goal: General statement defming what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with
"TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such
as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect", Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to
specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: All Elements should be revised to reflect Department name changes,
designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and
grammatical changes.
************************************************************************************
Capital Improvement Element
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
Policy 2.10
Objective 3
Policy 3.1
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.6
Policy 4.7
Policy 5.1
- Revision to introduce reducing VMT and GHG emissions as criterion for further
prioritizing projects; revision to provide another option/more options.
- Revisions related to multi-Element revisions in a comprehensive effort to manage
redundancy; revision related to 2010 cm adoption with "Regional Park land" LOSS
change from 2.9 to 2.7 acres per 1,000/population; revisions related to FDOT
comments to the DCA.
Reconsider revision recommended that would allow for more-responsive fiscal
management, as this Policy remains relevant and should not be changed.
- Minor revision timeframe reference.
- Minor revisions associated with new terminology.
- Minor revision to provide updated Statutory cite.
- Revision no longer necessary within context of EAR amendments; amendment to
provide updated reference cite was made recently as part of 2010 CIE adoption
(Ordinance No. 10-43).
- Minor revisions associated with new terminology.
- Minor revision to include an additional "best practices" entry.
- Minor revisions associated with new terminology; may need minor revision to provide
updated Statutory cite.
Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet
Transportation Element
Policy 3.3 - Modification to state corridor width evaluated on a case by case basis.
Policy 3.4 -
Policy 3.5 -
Policy 4.1 -
Policy 4.6 -
Policy 5.1 -
Policy 5.3 -
Policy 5.4 -
Policy 5.5 -
Policy 5.6 -
Policy 5.8 -
Policy 5.9 -
Policy 6.3 -
Policy 6.5 -
Policy 6.6 -
Policy 7.3 -
Policy 7.4 -
Policy 7.5 -
Policy 9.3 -
Policy 11.2 -
Policy 12.8 -
Objective13-
Modifications to provide more flexibility in policy.
Revision to eliminate time frame for achieving policy.
Revision to be consistent with policy 4.3.
Addition to policy to address HB697.
Revision to provide clarification and applicability of policy.
Modifications to provide expanded applicability of policy.
Revision to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5,
HB697, and 8B360.
Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TDM strategies.
Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TDM strategies and language
outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and 8B360.
Modification to improve effectiveness of policy.
Deletion based upon action accomplished.
Revisions to provide clarity to policy.
Revisions to update list of projects identified.
Collier County shall encourage emergency egress be permitted at all temporary access
facilities. (new)
Modifications to expand applicability of policy.
Modifications to recognize the requirement to implement HB697.
Revision to recognize on-going efforts of the policy.
Revision to provide clarity of policy.
Revision to require the BCC review and approve the requested Airport Authority
Master Plan.
Deletion based upon transit systems exempt from concurrency.
The County shall evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element in the Growth
Management Plan.
Public Facilities Element - Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element
Objective 1 - Minor revisions to provide new departmental references; reformatting.
Policy 1.1 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 1.3 -- Consider revision to set new review and reporting requirements.
Policy 1.4 - May need an updated Ordinance cite.
Policy 1.5 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 1. 7 - Minor revision to provide updated Ordinance cite.
Objective 2 - Reformatting.
Policy 2.1 - Minor revisions to reconcile figures and be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan;
part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy.
Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 2.4 - Minor revision to reference earlier Policy.
Objective 3 - Reformatting.
Policy 3.1 -- Revise/augment to introduce new Policy regarding private wastewater facilities.
Objective 4 - Reformatting.
Policy 4.7 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Objective 5 - Consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in
demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions; reformatting.
Policy 5.3 - Minor revision to provide new agency reference; may need an updated/clearer Policy cite.
Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element
Goal
Objective 1
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.5
Policy 1.6
Objective 2
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
Policy 2.6
Objective 3
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Objective 4
Policy 4.5
Policy 4.6
Objective 5
- Revisions to reflect all that supplying potable water entails, and its interdependence
with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements.
- Minor revisions and reformatting.
- Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
- Minor revision to provide additional specificity.
- Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
- Minor revision to provide additional specificity.
- Revision to strengthen this Policy language, be more inclusive and provide the desired
clarity; reformatting.
- Minor revisions to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan, correctly reference
an outside document, and provide additional specificity.
- Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
- Minor revision to recognize document updates.
- Minor revision to update Ordinance reference.
- Reformatting.
Minor revisions to reconcile certain LOS standards; deleting an unnecessary statement;
part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; revision to add
Ave Maria facility and LOSS information; consider revision to introduce water
pressures and water amounts as new measures of Levels of Service.
- Minor revision to abbreviate.
- Minor revision to abbreviate.
- Minor revisions to abbreviate, and provide additional specificity; additional statement
specifying review procedure; verify accuracy of agency names and identifications.
- Reformatting.
- Provide specificity if deemed necessary.
- Minor revision to eliminate redundant language in describing term used.
- Minor revision to provide new departmental reference; defer consideration of suggested
modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating
support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting.
Public Facilities Element - Draina2e Sub-Element
Goal - Revisions to reflect all that stormwater management entails, and its interdependence
with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting.
Objective 1 - Minor revision to reflect GIS use; reformatting.
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Objective 2
Policy 2.1
Objective 3
Policy 3.4
Objective 4
Policy 4.1
Objective 5
Objective 6
Policy 6.1
Policy 6.2
Policy 6.3
- Reformatting.
- Part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; verify that "as
amended" may be used in this context.
- Reformatting.
- Revision to provide the desired clarity.
- Reformatting, with consideration of minor revision to provide the emphasis suggested
by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC).
- Revision to update document reference.
- Reformatting; verify that "as amended" may be used in this context.
- Reformatting, with consideration of revisions to provide additional natural drainage
feature protections in certain County projects, introducing new detention features and
including filter marshes, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC).
Verify that certain Federal and State standards would apply, with the proper agency
protocols, whether or not references are included to them.
Minor revision to update document cite; revision to coincide with the increased water
quality treatment requirement found in the CCME.
Minor revision to update document cite; consideration of revisions to provide additional
natural drainage feature protections, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory
Council (EAC).
Public Facilities Element - Solid Waste Sub-Element
Goal
Objective 1
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.4
Objective 2
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
Policy 2.8
Policy 2.14
Policy 2.18
Policy 2.24
Policy 2.25
Policy 2.28
Policy 2.30
Objective 3
Policy 3.2
- Revision to incorporate guiding principles for solid waste management; reformatting.
- Minor revisions including reformatting.
- Minor revision to add explanatory details.
- Verify that "as amended" may be used in this context.
- Minor revision to add explanatory details.
- Reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies, as amended
- Revisions to remove mandate to complete a date-specific task; consider alternate
version for minor revision in reference to specific facility.
- Part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy.
- Revision to reduce level of specificity.
- New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to maintain effective
debris clean-up plans.
New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to study improved waste
management techniques.
New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to evaluate viability of
recycling agricultural plastic films.
New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to explore feasibility of
expanding Immokalee transfer facility to provide additional services.
New recommendation to add a Policy directing the County to assist other groups to
establish recycling programs.
New recommendation to add a Policy directing the County to encourage the
construction of sustainable buildings.
- Minor revision, including reformatting.
- Minor revision to delete a parenthetical statement.
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 3.4
Policy 3.5
New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to encourage sustainable
landscaping practices.
New recommendation to add a Policy ensuring the County meets recent, Statutory
recycling rate.
Public Facilities Element - Natural Groundwater Aquifer Rechal"2:e Sub-Element
Goal
Objective 1
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.5
Objective 2
Policy 2.2
Objective 3
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.5
Objective 4
Policy 4.1
Objective 5
Policy 5.5
- Revisions to reflect all that aquifer recharge area protection entails, and its
interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements;
reformatting.
- Revisions to extend time allowed to complete a periodic task; reformatting.
- Minor revision.
- Consider revision to identify potable water wellfield locations in the greater ImmokaIee
area.
- Consider revision to identify department involved with preparing and utilizing the
referenced publication; minor revision to update document cite; verify that "as
amended" may be used in this context.
- Reformatting.
- Minor revision to update document cite.
- Reformatting.
- Consider revision to reflect coordinated monitoring efforts, and point out monitoring
efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area
- Consider revision to point out efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area.
- Reformatting.
- Minor revision to reference another section in same document.
- Revisions, including reformatting; removal of undefmed term from further use in this
Objective and its subsequent Policies.
- Modify to reduce extent of specificity.
Housin2 Element
Objective 1
Policy 1.1
Policy 1.4
Objective 2
Policy 2.1
- Revise to reflect a new annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate.
- Revise to reflect that the County presently has affordable-housing interlocal agreements
with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island; and, add a requirement that the
municipalities shall re-evaluate their respective interlocal agreements with the County
every three years.
- Revise to make consistent with Section 163.3177(f) l.g., Florida Statutes.
- Modify to reflect the removal of the HOC reference and their stated mission; add the
phrase "for- profit and not- for-profit providers of affordable-workforce housing" before
the phrase, "shall assist Collier County..."; and, delete the references to "fifteen"
percent and "1,000" units and replace with a new annual yearly affordable-workforce
unit production rate.
- Revise to remove agency reference, as it is no longer relevant.
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 2.9
Policy 2.10
Policy 2.11
Policy 3.5
Policy 3.7
Objective 4
Policy 4.3
Policy 5.4
Policy 5.6
Policy 5.7
Objective 6
Objective 7
Objective 8
Policy 8.1
Policy 8.2
Policy 8.3
Policy 8.6
Objective 9
Policy 9.1
Policy 9.2
Policy 9.3
Policy 9.4
Policy 9.5
- Revise to reflect new timeline for task completion.
- Revise to reflect departmental name change and Program addition.
- Revise to replace a specific departmental reference with a general reference.
- Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task.
- Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task.
- Revise to remove reference to City of Naples conducting survey.
- Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task.
- Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task.
- Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task.
- Revise date to coincide with the amended survey commission date to be established in.
- Revise to delete the term, "group care facilities" and replace with the term, "group
housing and Continuing Care Retirement Centers".
- Revise to delete the term, "Urban Coastal Fringe" and replace with the term, "Coastal
High Hazard Area".
- Modify the Objective to remove the restriction that rehabilitated units must be located
only in the Immokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the
Rural Lands Stewardship Area.
- Modify to remove reference to "non-conforming" residences to correlate with the
Immokalee Area Master Plan Element.
- Delete, as Policy objective has been completed.
- Modify to reflect completion of survey and provide a reference that activities are
ongomg.
- Revise to remove second sentence of Policy.
- Staff recommends creating a new Objective based on the 2009 adoption ofHB 697,
Green House Gas Reduction strategies.
- Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption ofHB 697, Green
House Gas Reduction strategies.
- Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green
House Gas Reduction strategies.
- Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green
House Gas Reduction strategies.
- Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green
House Gas Reduction strategies.
- Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green
House Gas Reduction strategies.
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Policy 1.1.1 - Modification based upon BCC action to adjust level of service from stated level.
Policy 1.1.5 - Deletion based upon removal of facilities value as a level of service standard by the
BCe.
Policy 1.1.6 - Revision for clarification of the policy.
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 1.3.1 - Revision to promote alternative transportation routes to County owned parks to promote
Green House Gas reductions.
Policy 1.4.1 - Revision for clarification ofthe policy.
Policy 1.4.2 - Revision to eliminate list of governmental providers of recreational facilities.
Policy 1.5.1 - Revision of policy to include open space.
Goal 2 - Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Objective 2.1- Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Policy 2.1.1 - Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Policy 2.1.2 - Modification and relocation based upon changes to treatment of neighborhood parks.
Policy 2.1.3 - Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Policy 2.1.4 - Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Policy 2.1.5 - Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Goal 3 - Revision based upon Goal 2 proposed deletion.
Objective 3.1- Revision to reflect anticipated adoption of the Parks Master Plan.
Policy 3.1.1 - Revision based on renumbering.
Policy 3.1.2 - Revision based on renumbering.
Policy 3.1.3 - Revision based on renumbering.
Policy 3.1.4 - Revision based on renumbering and elimination of assumption of automatic cost
increases.
Policy 3.1.5 - Revision based on renumbering.
Policy 3.1.6 - Revision based on renumbering.
Policy 3.1.7 - Revision based on renumbering and potentially on outcome of Parks Master Plan.
Conservation & Coastal Manaeement Element
Objective 1.1- Revise to reflect Program has been implemented and activities are ongoing.
Policy 1.1.3 - Revise per EAC to address financial feasibility.
Policy 1.1.6 - Revise to include an effective date.
Objective 1.2- Revise per the EAC to address database provisions.
Policy 1.2.3 - Modify to require that only watershed dependent data should be organized by watershed
and sub-basin units; and revise per CCPC to include specific text.
Policy 1.2.5 - Delete per staff as Policy is no longer relevant.
Policy 1.3.1 - Revise per EAC to include correct acronyms.
Policy 1.3.4 - Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant.
Objective 2.1- Modify to reflect completed work and reword first sentence in item (c); and revise per
EAC to add requirement that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the
same drainage area.
Policy 2.1.3 - Revise per EAC to include within the Policy measurement tools for determining
improvements to the watersheds over time.
Policy 2.1.6 - Revise per EAC to include within the Policy the use of watershed management plans
Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet
for ongoing data collection guidance.
Policy 1.3.1 - Revise to reflect most current acronym references per EAC
Policy 1.3.4 - Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant
Objective 2.1-Revise to require that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the same
drainage area per EAC
Policy 2.1.3 - Revise to include requirement for measurement tools for determining improvements to
the watersheds over time per EAC
Policy 2.1.6 - Revise to require the use of watershed management plans for ongoing data collection
guidance per EAC
Objective 2.2- Modify to add qualifier, such as ''to attain the highest water quality practical" per staff;
retain Objective text as written per CCPC; and retain Objective text as written per
SFWMD.
Revise to include provision to encourage wastewater re-use for irrigation per EAC.
Revise to include establishment and implementation of a fertilizer ordinance to limit
nitrogen and phosphorus use per EAC.
Revise to include benchmarks for Policy achievement per EAC.
Revise to include coordination and Plan development with the FDEP per staff; and
retain Objective text as written per CCPe.
Objective 2.5- Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise
to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC.
Policy 2.5.1 - Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise
to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC.
Policy 2.5.2 - Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise
to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC.
Policy 2.5.3 - Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise
to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC.
Objective 3.1- Revise to reflect establishment of the monitoring network, addition of phrase, "to
ensure highest water quality practical," and reference that groundwater monitoring
activities are ongoing per staff; and, retain Objective text as written per CCPC.
Policy 3.1.1 - Revise to address improvement of groundwater monitoring in order to assess saltwater
intrusion per EAC.
Objective 3.3- Revise to add provision for staff assessment within a specific lmmokalee well field
extending under the airport and adjoining industrial lands per EAC.
Revise to add reference to salinity trending within Policy per EAC.
Revise to add provision for coordination with the SFWMD and Big Cypress Basin per
EAC.
Policy 4.1.2 - Revise to indicate that the County, in coordination with the SFWMD shall be
responsible for devising a method to determine agricultural pumpage.
Policy 4.1.3 - Revise to indicate County Department responsible for compiling water use
requirements of the native plant and animal community associations within the County.
Modify to reference the June 2010 Land Development Code amendments that
implement specific subsections of this Policy, address scrivener's errors in subsections
Policy 2.2.1 -
Policy 2.2.2 -
Policy 2.2.5 -
Objective 2.3-
Policy 3.4.1 -
Policy 3.4.4 -
Policy 6.1.1-
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 6.1.2 -
Policy 6.2.1-
Objective 6.2-
Policy 6.2.3 -
Policy 6.2.5 -
Policy 6.2.7 -
Policy 6.3.2 -
Policy 6.3.3 -
Policy 7.1.2 -
Policy 7.1.6 -
Objective 7.2 -
Policy 7.2.2-
6.1.1 (7 & 13) and revise applicable subsections, delete subsection 6.1.1 (7), and add an
exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State
parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation per staff;
revise to clearly reflect intent per CCPC; and, revise to clearly reflect intent per EAC.
Revise to include reference to the June 20 I 0 Land Development Code amendments that
implement specific subsections of the Policy, and include an exemption from the
native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and
forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation purposes per staff; revise to
clearly reflect intent per CCPC; and, revise to clearly reflect intent per EAC.
Revise to correct the Florida Administrative Code reference; and insert reference to the
current SFWMD land use and land cover inventory.
Revise to require mitigation within the same drainage area as initial impact per EAC.
Revise provision (6) to include that watershed management plans contain designated
areas to be protected from development so as to preserve habitat, water flows, recharge
areas and to prevent future flooding per EAC.
Delete Section 6.2.5 (6)(5)(b)(3), as the specific criteria to identify mitigation priorities
and implement the incentive program have been adopted into the Land development
Code, and address native vegetation retention standards for the Lake Trafford/Camp
Keais Strand System as part of the Immokalee Area Master Plan amendments per staff;
and revise to clarify native vegetation requirements for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais
Strand System per CCPC; and revise to clarify native vegetation requirements for the
Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System and provide cross references to other
Elements per EAC.
Revise to require wetland mitigation within impacted watershed per EAC.
Revise to reflect maintenance dredging permit requirement and include within the
CCME additional policies to protect sea grasses from dredging activities per the EAC.
Delete, as the new FWC Rule Change prohibits speed zones to be established based on
benthic resources per staff; retain Policy as written per CCPC; and, retain Policy as
written per EAC.
Delete references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy, revise
to add a general reference to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their
technical assistance, and delete the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no
such mitigation is required by the FFWCC or USFWS per staff; and revise to add
provision for retention of old growth slash pines for RCW nesting habitat per EAC.
Delete, as the Land Development Code amendment to implement this Policy has been
completed per staff; and, revise to reflect the continuance of Policy Objective per
CCPC.
Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on manatee deaths in Collier
County waters.
Delete specific reference to Policy 6.3.3, as reference is no longer relevant per staff;
and revise Policy to retain reference to Policy 6.3.3 per EAC.
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on sea turtle disorientation.
Revise to reflect the correct Policy reference.
Modify Policy to refer to other funding opportunities.
Revise to reflect the establishment of a training program.
Revise to reflect current departmental reference.
Modify to reflect the establishment, and maintenance, of a cooperative agreement.
Modify to remove redundant sentence.
Revise Policy or add policies to include strategies to preserve recreational and
commercial working waterfronts.
Policy 10.1.5 - Modify to consistently refer to "marine" wetlands per staff; revise to clarify "marine
wetlands" per CCPC; and revise to define or clarify "marine wetlands" per EAC.
Modify to require that destruction of any marine wetlands requires a fiscal analysis.
Modify to require beach access sites shown on plans to be at the discretion of the
County.
Objective 10.3- Revise to include LDC map reference per EAC.
Objective 10.4- Revise Objective to read, "...continue to be restored and then maintained per EAC.
Policy 10.4.13 - Modify the Policy to change its focus to educating the public about sea level rise.
Policy 10.6.2 - Delete, as existing regulations are adequate to address sea level rise per staff; retain
Policy as written per the CCPC; and retain Policy as written per the EAC.
Objective 12.1- Modify to address legislative changes to hurricane evacuations requirements.
Policy 12.1.3 - Modify to reflect shelter space figures that are consistent with the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study Update.
Policy 12.1.5 - Modify to reflect updated equipment listing requirements for onsite shelters.
Policy 12.1.7 - Revise to add requirement to coordinate with the municipalities per CCPC.
Policy 12.1.9 - Revise to reflect correct terminology and coordination activities.
Policy 12.1.11 - Revise to reflect latest date of document.
Policy 12.1.12 - Revise to reflect latest date of document.
Policy 12.1.13 - Modify to reference funding limitations.
Policy 12.1.14 - Delete, as the inclusion of hurricane shelters within the 5-year schedule of Capital
Improvements is not supported.
Policy 12.1.15 - Modify to make Policy references consistent with State and Federal guidelines; and,
revise to reflect latest date of document.
Policy 12.1.17 - Revise sentence for clarity.
Policy 12.1.21 - Revise to reflect the next due date for the Plan update.
Policy 12.2.5 - ModifY to provide new CHHA definition.
Policy 12.3.2 - Revise for clarification and sentence structure.
Objective 12.4- Revise to reflect current terminology and departmental names.
Objective 7.3-
Policy 7.3.1 -
Policy 7.4.1 -
Policy 9.1.6 -
Policy 9.1.7-
Policy 9.2.3 -
Policy 9.4.3 -
Policy 10.1.1 -
Policy 10.1.6 -
Policy 10.2.1 -
Intereovernmental Coordination Element - ICE
Objective 1 - Minor revisions to include certain key agencies.
Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.6
Policy 2.7
Policy 2.8
Policy 2.9
- Revision to reflect the Department name change.
- Revision to reflect the Department name change.
- Inclusion of the word "appropriate" so that agreements are not limited to agencies
within Collier County.
- Minor text revisions to update dates.
- Minor text revisions to update dates and requirements.
- Revision to correct SFWMD name.
- Minor text revisions to include a comma and delete specific Florida Statute sub-section.
Future Land Use Element
Revise to allow for, but not mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace
"shall" with "may").
Revise to correct the cm Policy reference.
If changes are made to the Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion
Area density reduction factor, as proposed, then revise this policy to delete that
reference.
Revise to reflect the existence of the TCMAs (perhaps replace "shall designate" on
first line with "has designated").
Revise to recognize the periodic update (perhaps replace the last sentence with a
commitment to periodically update the inventory).
Revise to specify that a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or
its agent unless first approved by the Board, to add reference to the Immokalee
Redevelopment Plan, and to correct the date reference.
Revise to clarify changes to the Urban designation refers to the new designation of
lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the third line with "addition").
Revise as necessary to reflect the changed status and contents of the Inter-local
Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the Public School
Facilities Element.
Revise to reference the establishment of TCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace "are
hereby" in the last sentence with "have been").
Revise paragraph e) to begin with a verb so as to follow the sentence structure
(perhaps add "Providing" before "Vehicular").
Revise to reference reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce
greenhouse gas emissions," on the second line after "policies,".
Revise for proper wording (perhaps replace "and their interconnection points" with
"and/or provide interconnection(s)."
Policy 7.7: Revise to update the Division name.
Density Rating System - Residential In-fIll: Revise to eliminate TDR requirement.
Policy 1.4:
Policy 2.1:
Policy 2.4:
Policy 2.5:
Policy 4.5
Policy 4.7:
Policy 5.3:
Policy 5.14:
Objective 6:
Policy 6.3:
Objective 7:
Policy 7.3:
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area: Delete, and replace with a Coastal High Hazard
Area density reduction factor; so reflect this on the FLUM; make correlating changes to all GMP
references to this provision; revise both the Roadway Access and Proximity to Mixed Use Activity
Center or Interchange Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuses to replace reference to this
provision with CHHA reference; and, revise the Conversion of Commercial Bonus to prohibit its
application within the CHHA. The Affordable- Workforce Housing Density Bonus would continue to
apply within the CHHA.
Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict: Revise to reduce allowable density for residential-only
projects within the CHHA to a maximum of 4 DU/ A; revise the Master Planned Activity Center
provision for clarity, and possible substantive change.
Rural Fringe Mixed Use District: Revise to clarify the District only applies to A-zoned lands; to
correct a miss-numbering in the RFMUD Sending Lands designation; and, revise the Exemption
provision to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and to delete unneeded text from the Exemption
title.
Future Land Use Map: Revise the CHHA boundary to correlate with any CHHA boundary description
change made in CCME Policy 12.2.5.
Planning Horizon Issue: Revise the various planning horizons in the GMP to be consistent.
Designation/District/Subdistrict Relationship: Revise throughout to clarify the relationship between
Designations, Districts and Subdistricts.
Map FLUE-l4 Existing Zoning Consistent with FLUE by Policy, Immokalee Area: Delete;
replacement map to be adopted into the Immokalee Area Master Plan to correlate with new Policy 6.1.9
in that Master Plan.
Public School Facilities Element
Policy 2.3 - Delete the last paragraph within the Policy, as the required school concurrency
regulations were adopted within the Land Development Code in June 20 I O.
Policy 2.5 - Delete the Policy, as the required school concurrency regulations were adopted within
the Land Development Code in June 2010.
Policy 3.6: - Revise the Policy to reflect the establishment of the Citizen Advisory Group (CAG);
and, add a reference to reflect that the planning and monitoring of school concurrency
by the CAG is ongoing.
Golden Gate Area Master Plan - The below list designate policies that should be visited during the
Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy effort.
Goall - Reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Objectives and Policies.
Objective 1.1 - Reformatting.
Policy 1.1.4 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identitY a specific land area and treat it
differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain as written.
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
- Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete.
- Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, relocate or reformat.
Review for accuracy regarding references to maps located elsewhere, Policies found in
other GMP Elements, and adoption dates of referenced documents; then, revise as
necessary or retain as written.
Policy 1.2.2 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to identify another specific activity able to
benefit from alternative financing, and re-emphasize balanced transportation planning
efforts - in part or entirely.
Policy 1.2.4 - Reformatting.
Objective 1.3- Reformatting.
Policy 1.3.1 - Minor revisions to provide new departmental references.
Objective 1.4 - Reformatting.
Policy 1.4.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to expand to ensure comprehensive and
uniform application of LDC.
Goal 2 - Reformatting.
Objective 2.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identify a specific land area and treat it
differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain as written;
reformatting.
Policy 2.1.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable.
Policy 2.1.2 Defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identify a specific land area and treat it
differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain with minor revision to
update terminology.
Policy 2.1.3 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable.
Policy 2.1.4 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable.
Objective 2.2 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to show remaining efforts following major
project completion; reformatting.
Policy 2.2.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable.
Policy 2.2.2 defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable; review for
accuracy regarding references to LDC or Statutory cites,; then, revise as necessary or
retain as written.
Goal 3 - Reformatting.
Objective 3.1- Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its
subsequent Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions -
in part or entirely; reformatting.
Goal 4 - Reformatting.
Objective 4.1- Reformatting.
Policy 4.1.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific
task.
Policy 4.1.2 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific
task.
Policy 4.1.3 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific
task.
GoalS - Reformatting.
Objective 5.1 - Consider minor revision to show use of existing resource; revisions to delete mandate
to complete a date-specific task; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policy; defer
consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent
Policy 1.1.5
Policy 1.1.6
Policy 1.1.8
Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet
Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or
entirely; reformatting.
Policy 5.1.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revision to show use of existing resource; revisions to
better support its Objective; reformatting.
Objective 5.2 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan; reformatting.
Policy 5.2.1 - Minor revision for clarity; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen
this Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part
or entirely; reformatting.
Policy 5.2.2 - Revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; consider minor revision to
show use of existing MPO resource; defer consideration of suggested modification to
strengthen this Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions
- in part or entirely.
Policy 5.2.3 - Minor revision to show remaining efforts following major project completion.
Objective 5.3- Defer consideration of suggested revision to show use of existing resource; reformatting.
Policy 5.3.2 - Minor revision to strengthen preservation efforts.
Goal 6 - Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Goal, and its
subsequent Objectives and Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and
GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting.
Objective 6.1- Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its
subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions -
in part or entirely; revisions to illustrate expanded planning efforts for more mobility
options; reformatting.
Policy 6.1.1 - Minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts; reformatting.
Policy 6.1.2 - Minor revision to reflect continuing efforts between agencies.
Objective 6.2 -Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its
subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions -
in part or entirely; revisions to this Objective and its subsequent Policies addressing
development of route alternatives for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area;
reformatting.
Policy 6.2.4 - Revisions to strengthen the connection with Transportation Policy 7.1 and develop
different urban and rural standards and criteria.
Objective 6.3 - revisions to this Objective and its subsequent Policies addressing development of route
alternatives for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area; reformatting.
Policy 6.3.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific
task.
Policy 6.3.2 - Minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task.
Goal 7 - Reformatting.
Objective 7.1 - Reformatting.
Policy 7.1.3 - Revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task.
Objective 7.2 - Reformatting.
Policy 7.2.1 - Minor revision.
Policy 7.2.2 - Minor revision to eliminate duplication of activities.
Objective 7.3- Re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies; defer consideration of suggested
modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating
support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting.
Policy 7.3.1 - Minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts.
Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet
Policy 7.3.2 - Review for accuracy regarding references to adoption dates of referenced documents;
then, revise as necessary or retain as written.
Policy 7.3.4 - Minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task.
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Objective 1
Policy 1.2
Objective 2
Objective 3
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.8
Policy 3.9
Policy 3.14
Policy 3.14
Objective 4
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.3
- Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective.
- Revision to expand focus of policy.
- Revision to expand focus of objective
- Revision to objective by making this objective number 1, with all policies under this
objective reflecting the change.
- Modification based upon expansion of the policy.
- Revision based upon need to explain what is the County's traditional economic base.
- Deletion based upon redundancy with policy 3.3
- Relocation of text.
- Replace existing policy with one which calls for the County to monitor the County's
unemployment rate.
- Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective.
- Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single
policy.
- Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single
policy.
- Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single
policy.
Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet
Exhibit B
The following Policies and/or Objectives have recommendations from the CCPC, EAC,
and/or staff that suggest different direction or require funding for the proposed changes.
Staff is asking the BCC to provide final arbitration on the issues identified.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element
Policy 1.1.3:
Collier County shall continue to support established environmental policies by
maintaining an appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit
capable of developing, administering, and providing long-term direction for the
protection and management of the County's environmental resources.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The County continues to support established environmental policies by maintaining an
appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of developing,
administering, and providing long-term direction for the protection and management of the
County's environmental resources.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AU$!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that the financial feasibility of achieving the Policy objectives with limited staff
resources be evaluated.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to this
Policy is recommended. Staff believes that current staffing levels are adequate to fulfill the
Policy objectives, and adjustments have been made over time in response to changes in
workload]
OBJECTIVE 1.2:
Maintain the framework for an integrated, computer-based environmental resources data
storage, analysis, and graphics system and annually update the databases based on
previous year's analytical data in order to monitor the status of the County's natural
resources and propose potential protection measures when appropriate.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The Collier County Environmental Planning Section maintains a robust, GIS-based system
(ESRI's ArcGIS) that will be updated annually.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAc) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that the Objective address/include provisions for quality of data, analysis of data,
and availability of data; and, the Environmental Planning Section maintain copies of, and an
index to, analyses performed on these GIS-based data.]
1 Exhibit B
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinfls - Staff Comment - No change to this
Policy is recommended. The computer-based environmental resources data is stored with the
Division's GIS data. This makes the data most available to other county staff. Data quality
details are stored as metadata files when they are provided by the data source. Published GIS
data are required to include metadata files. Almost all county data are public records and
available, there is no need for the environmental planning section to maintain copies. A log of
environmental analysis will be started and stored with the environmental GIS data.)
Policy 1.2.3:
Collected and/or compiled data will be organized by established water-shed and
sub-basin units.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Most of this data is in GIS format, so there is no need or benefit to organize it by watershed.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to
require watershed dependent data only be organized by watershed and sub-basin units.
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that text be added to the Policy that ensures data quality.)
{Planninfl Commission Comment from the AUf!Ust 27.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
Policy be revised to read, "Non GIS-based data collected will be organized by established
watershed and sub-basin units. "]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinfls - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with
the CCPC recommendation that the Policy be revised for clarity. However, staff does not concur
with the EAC's recommendation, as "data quality" is addressed in preceding Policies.)
Policy 1.3.1 :
The purpose of the NRPA program is to direct incompatible land uses away from
significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems
of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species.
The program will-include the following:
a. Identification of the NRPAs in map form as an overlay to the Future land Use Map;
During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area, the County has determined that
CREW Trust lands, Belle Meade, a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be
identified as NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate
Estates is a NPRA. The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the
Future land Use Map.
b. A process for verifying the existence and boundaries of NRPAs during
development permit applications;
c. Guidelines and standards for development of NRPAs including conservation
guidelines to protect natural resource values, to maintain ecologically functioning
systems, and to restore or mitigate NRPAs already degraded. Allowable land uses,
vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species
2 Exhibit B
protection criteria for the NRPAs are those contained in the NRPA Overlay within
the Future land Use Element
d. A review process, integrated into the normal development application review, to
ensure that the guidelines and standards are being met;
e. A program to defer development of NRPAs. First consideration should be fee simple
purchase (based on public referenda approving and funding purchases). Other
options should include, but not be limited to, tax incentives and transfer of
development rights;
f. A program to pursue Delegation of Authority Agreements with State and Federal
Permitting agencies for local regulation of activities that may alter the biological
and physical characteristics of NRPAs;
g. The County shall seek assistance from and support State (e.g. CARL, SOR) or
Federal land acquisition programs for County areas qualifying as NRPAs.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The County established Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs) to direct incompatible land
uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large
systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species.
The Policy also provides information regarding the relationship of the NRP As to the Rural and
Agricultural Area Assessment. Finally, the Policy requires the County to seek assistive from,
and support, state and/or federal land acquisition programs for areas qualifying as NRP As;
Conservation Collier identifies nominated properties within Federal and State acquisition areas
and coordinates with the agencies to make them aware of willing sellers within their acquisition
areas.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11, 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting to delete the acronym "CARL" and insert "Florida Forever "; and spell-out the
acronym, "SOR" - Save Our Rivers.]
[Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff generally
agrees with the EAC's recommendation, and suggests that the Policy be revised to read, 'The
County shall seek assistance from, and support, State and/or Federal land acquisition programs
for County areas qualifying as NRP As. ']
OBJECTIVE 2.1:
By January 2008, the County shall complete the prioritization and begin the process of
preparing Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to
protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The process shall consist of (1) an
evaluation of areas for which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on
current or past watershed management planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available
data and information that can be used in the development of Watershed Management
Plans, and (3) budget authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed
Management Plan by January 2008. A funding schedule shall be established to ensure
that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by 2010. In selecting the order
of Plan completion, the County shall give priority to watersheds where the development
growth potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of wetland and listed
3 Exhibit B
species habitats. The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the Federal
and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Until the
Watershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the following as
interim standards for development:
a. All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water
quality volumetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for
Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water
Management District (February 2006) and the retention and detention
requirements, and the allowable offsite discharge rates required by Drainage Sub-
element Policy 6.2 and 6.3, respectively;
b. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands
shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance
capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland.
c. Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the
designated flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance
Rate Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an
effective date of November 17, 2005. Floodplain storage compensation shall also
be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or
sheetflow conditions.
d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to
determine impacts to natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs. For this particular
evaluation, natural wetlands, f1owways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified
as contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet
facultative plant species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the
natural wetland, flowway, or slough at least one (1) foot lower than the ground at
the edge of the natural wetland, f1owway, or slough. The edge of the natural
wetlands, f1owways, or sloughs shall be identified by field determination and
based upon vegetation and elevation differences from the adjacent uplands or
transitional wetlands. The County shall require the applicant to avoid direct
impacts to these natural wetlands, f1owways, or sloughs or, when not possible, to
ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the
same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact The County shall adhere to
the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 2001-27,
adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and
provided basin delineations where special peak discharge rates have been
established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the
Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and
findings of the Watershed Management Plans.
e. All new development and re-development projects shall ensure surrounding
properties will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on
stormwater sheet flow.
f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all
development projects to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental
permits.
g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt
land development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future
development or re-development projects. Best Management Practices means
structural and non-structural facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution
either through source control or treatment of stormwater.
Figure 1.
Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.1.d is
4 Exhibit B
Applicable [See Figure 1 following CCME text]
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Collier County is currently involved in the development of the Watershed Management Plans.
The County completed the initial delineation and prioritization of the watersheds by the end of
November 2007. Dedicated funding for development of the Watershed Management Plans was
also obtained and set aside in 2007. The County coordinated with the Florida Department of
Emergency Management coastal Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) aerial topographic
mapping effort to obtain more detailed and expanded coverage of the County. The County also
coordinated with the South Florida Water Management District to utilize their existing two-
dimensional regional hydrologic and hydraulic model for southwest Florida as a starting tool in
the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The County utilized the various policies
under CCME Objective 2.1 to form the basis for the Scope of Services and then hired a
consultant team to prepare the Watershed Management Plans. The work is in progress and is
scheduled for completion by the end of 20 1 O.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be
modified to reflect completed work, and the first sentence in (c) reworded as follows,
"Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated
Special Flood Hazard Area (flood zones starting with the letter "V" or "A") as depicted on the
effective Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency."
[Public Comment (Community Meetinf! held on 3/15/10):
Public stated that the County has not developed a county-wide stormwater plan.)
(Public Comment (Community Meetinf! held on 3/15/10):
Public stated that all development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and
evaluated after each watershed and its characteristics are developed.)
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting to add in section b. of the Objective, a requirement that compensation for all wetland
impacts occur within the same drainage area.)
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will
be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for
wetland impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management
Plans.)
Policy 2.1.3:
The Plans will also evaluate structural and non-structural controls for restoring historical
hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where possible and for reducing the impacts of
canal and stonnwater discharges to estuaries.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Scope of Services for development of the Watershed Management Plans includes this
policy's features.
5 Exhibit B
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUJrnst 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that measurement tools be added to the Policy so as to determine improvements to
the watersheds over time.]
{Em'ironmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adoption
Hearing - Suggesting that the EAC comment from August 11, 2010 be revised to read,
"measurement tools be added to the Policy for determining improvements to the watersheds over
time. "J
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdoTJtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to the
Policy is recommended at this time. The Watershed Management Plans include performance
measures, and the need for future evaluation of improvements will be addressed when Plans are
adopted]
Policy 2.1.6:
Until the completion and adoption of individual watershed management plans, promote
water management pennitting on a basin by basin approach.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Water management permitting is regulated by the South Florida Water Management District.
The Policy is not relevant and should be deleted, as water management permitting is regulated by
the SFWMD.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11, 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that data shortfalls be addressed.]
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 AdoTJtion
Hearinf! - Suggesting that EAC comment from August 11, 2010 be revised to read, "use
watershed management plans for ongoing data collection guidance. "J
{Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to the
Policy is recommended at this time, as the Watershed Management Plans will identify data
needs.]
Policy 2.2.1:
Wastewater treabnent plants shall not be allowed to discharge directly to rivers, canals
or jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives and
Policies of this Element.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.2.1 bans wastewater treatment plants from discharging directly into rivers, canals or
jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives, and Policies of this
Element.
6 Exhibit B
lIDs Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{ElTVironmental Advisorv Council (EAc) Comment from the AUJlUst 11. 2010 WorksholJ -
Suggesting to insert the phrase, "encourage wastewater re-usefor irrigation" within the Policy.}
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdolJtion Hearim!s - Staff Comment - Staff recommends
retaining the Policy as written, as the reference to "re-use" is not applicable to this Policy.
Further, staff suggests an additional Policy be added within the CCME to address the EAC's
recommendation, if Board directed.}
Policy 2.2.5:
By December 31, 2008, and no less than every three years, stormwater management
systems shall be inspected and certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for
compliance with their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
The deadline for Policy 2.2.5 has not been met, and the County has not identified stormwater
management systems that are not currently meeting State water quality treatment standards. The
County is developing a process for storrnwater management systems, which is expected to be
completed by December 2015.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to
reflect an extended deadline to December 2015; and include a requirement to coordinate
activities with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and FDEP.
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 WorksholJ -
Suggesting to add benchmarks within the Policy for the achievement of the stated objectives by
year 2015.}
{Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - No change to the
Policy is recommended at this time. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has
been working on an update to the statewide stormwater Rule that includes system inspections.
The County is following the development of this Rule and will wait to review the standards in the
Rule prior to adopting a local ordinance.]
Policy 3.1.1 :
Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be
protected as follows:
1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management
Zones defined as follows:
a} W-1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads
and extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which
approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield).
b) W-2 is the land area between the W-1 boundary line and the ten percent ground
water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two year ground water
travel time to the potable water wellfield).
7 Exhibit B
c) W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent
ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five year ground
water travel time to the potable water wellfield).
d) W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground
water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground
water travel time to the potable water wellfield).
2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows:
a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management
zones.
b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3.
c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products
and hazardous wastes: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3.
d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding
250 liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary
containment in W-1, W-2, W-3.
e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W-1.
f) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found
in 40 CFR part 135.
g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based
on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use.
h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited
in W-1 and W-2, conditional use required in W-3 and W-4.
i) Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area
greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-1 subject to
complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing
device and a low-pressure lateral distribution.
j) On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and
subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-1, W-2, and W-
3 shall meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-10, F.A.C. as
the rule existed on August 31, 1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring
plan.
3. Conditional uses shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and where
impacts of the development will be isolated from the Surficial and Intennediate
Aquifer.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
There is one (1) policy within this Objective. Policy 3.1.1 contains criteria for the identification
of wellhead protection areas within the County's Future Land Use Map Series.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but paragraph 3 should be modified to:
clarifY the conditional use reference pertains to those conditional uses required by this policy, as
opposed to all conditional uses allowed by the zoning district on a given property within a
wellfield protection area; and, remove or clarifY the term "extraordinary circumstances."
Additionally, the Policy will be evaluated to determine if it would be more appropriately located
in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE).
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf{Ust 11, 2010 Workshop - Suggest
addressing the improvement of ground water monitoring in order to assess saltwater intrusion.}
8 Exhibit B
(Post Workshop and Adootion Hearings - Staff Comment - Implementation of the EAC's
recommendation will require the monitoring activities to be programmed and funded)
OBJECTIVE 3.3:
Continue to identify, refine extents of, and map zones of influence and contribution
around potable wellfields in order to identify activities that must be regulated to protect
ground water quality near wellfields. (Refer to Objective 1.1 in the Natural Ground Water
Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element.)
Objective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy will be evaluated
to determine if it would be more appropriately located in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE).
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the August 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that staff assess the welljield in Immokalee that has a 10 year cone of depression
extending under the airport and adjoining industrial zoning.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - Implementation of
the EAC's recommendation will require the existing Model be adjusted to accommodate the 10-
year Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones, as the Model evaluates years 1, 2, 5
and 20 only. (/'he cost to acijust the Model is unknown at this time.))
Policy 6.1.6:
Exemptions from the native vegetation retention requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 -
The requirements of Policy 6.1.2 shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of
existing uses. Existing use shall be defined as: those uses for which all required permits
were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Conditional Use or Rezone
petition was approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for
which a completed application was submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of
existing uses shall include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent
with, or clearly ancillary to, the existing uses.
Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent
with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe area, and they may be
built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous
approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and
Policies for the Rural Fringe Area as long as they do not result in an increase in
development density or intensity. On the County owned land located in Section 25,
Township 26 E, Range 49 S (+/-360 acres), the native vegetation retention and site
preservation requirements may be reduced to 50% if the permitted uses are restricted to
the portions of the property that are contiguous to the existing land fill operations; exotic
removal will be required on the entire +/- 360 acres.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 6.1.6 makes all existing land uses exempt from the native vegetation retention
requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 if the effected land uses were issued prior to June 19, 2002;
9 Exhibit B
or projects for which a Conditional use or Rezone petition has been approved by the County
prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application has been
submitted prior to June 19,2002.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that the last sentence in the Policy be revised to read, "... exotic removal and
preserve management will be... '1
[Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment -No change is
recommended, as the Policy was adopted as part of the Final Order amendments in 2002 to
accommodate the expansion of the landfill. Preserve management is already required pursuant
to Policy 6.1.2 (6) of this Element.}
OBJECTIVE 6.2:
The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands
pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria
to make this objective measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and
strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by
Objective 2.1 of this Element
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
[Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11, 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting staff include within the Objective the requirement for mitigation within the same
drainage area as the initial wetland impact.}
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will
be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for
wetland impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management
Plans.}
Policy 6.2.3:
Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the
natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. This wetland preservation
and conservation process shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plan
process, as referenced in Objective 2.1 of this Element However, the process outlined
within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and
intensive development away from large interconnected wetland systems. These wetland
systems have been identified based on their type, values, functions, sizes, conditions
and locations within Collier County. These systems predominantly occur east of the
County's Urban boundary, as delineated on the Countywide Future land Use Map
(FlUM), within the Future land Use Element (FLUE). Many of these wetlands fall within
public lands or land targeted for acquisition. High quality wetlands systems located on
private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation
10 Exhibit B
requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or
Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or via the NRPA or Sending designations within
the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District or land/easement acquisition, or innovative
landowner incentives. Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located
within the northeastern portion of Collier County, excluding the community of
Immokalee, are contained in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay)
of the FLUE (and as depicted on the FLUM). Protection measures for wetlands and
wetland systems located within the Urban and Estates designated areas of the County
shall be based upon the jurisdictional detenninations made by the applicable state or
federal agency. Where pennits issued by such state or federal agencies allow for
impacts to wetlands within Urban and Estates designated areas and require mitigation
for such impacts, the pennitting agency's mitigation requirements shall be deemed to
preserve and protect wetlands and their functions, except for wetlands that are part of a
Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from
such wetlands.
The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County
shall be protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict
higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the
remaining allowable land uses. Collier County shall direct incompatible land uses away
from these large landscape scale wetland systems through implementation of the
following protection and conservation mechanisms:
(1) Conservation Designation
Best available data indicates that 76% of all wetlands found in Collier County
are contained within the boundaries of the Conservation Designation as
depicted on the Countywide Future Land Use Map. The overall purpose of the
Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of
Collier County and their associated environmental, recreational, and economic
benefits. The allowed land uses specified in the FLUE's Conservation
Designation (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section IV.) will
accommodate limited residential development and future non-residential
development. These limitations support Collier County's comprehensive
process to direct concentrated population growth and intensive land
development away from large connected wetland systems.
(2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC)
Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the
Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay. The land development
regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay District, as depicted on the
Countywide Future Land Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the goal of
directing higher intensity land uses away from wetland systems. The
development standards for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use
Designation Section V.) specify that site alterations shall be limited to 10% of
the total site. The majority of the land contained within the ACSC is also within
the Conservation Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of
that Land Use Designation.
(3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs)
Major wetland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to
establish the NRPA Overlay District as shown on the Future Land Use Map,
and as discussed in FLUE Land Use Designation, Section V.C. These areas
include high functioning wetland systems and, although portions of the NRPA
Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation, represent
11 Exhibit B
approximately 12% of the County's wetlands, which are not located in
Conservation Lands. Based on the relatively high concentration of wetlands
within NRPA designated lands, incompatible land uses shall be directed away
from these areas. Allowable land uses within NRPAs are also subject to native
vegetation retention and preservation standards of 90%.
(4) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands
Best available data indicates that 16,000+ acres of wetlands are contained
within designated Sending Lands and that such wetlands constitute
approximately 70% of land cover in these areas. Incompatible land uses are
directed away from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands through
an incentive-based Transfer of Development Rights (TOR) Program that allows
land owners within these Sending Lands to transfer their residential density
out of the Sending Lands to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (and limited
Urban) Receiving Lands. A complete description of the TOR Program is
contained in the FLUE, Future Land Use Designation Description Section,
Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Incompatible
land uses are also directed away from Sending Lands through restrictions on
allowable uses. Finally, allowable uses within these lands are also subject to
native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 80% to 90%, as
required by Policy 6.7.1 ofthis Element
(5) Flowway Stewardship Areas [re-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32
and 2002-54]
Flowway Stewardship Areas have been designated within the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map,
and are shown on the Rural Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Map
Series. Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs) are for the most part privately
owned wetlands that are located within the Camp Keais Strand and
Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands fonn the principal wetland flowway
systems in the RLSA. The Overlay provides an incentive to permanently
protect FSAs through the creation and transfer of Stewardship Credits. It also
contains provisions that eliminate incompatible uses from the FSAs and,
which establish protection measures.
(6) Watershed Management Plans
Collier County will establish watershed management plans throughout the
County, but with particular emphasis on the Urban and Estates designated
areas. These watershed management plans shall be established in
accordance with Objective 2.1 of this Element and will include the preservation
or, where feasible, creation of landscape-scale wetland conservation areas to
act as habitat, natural water quality treatment and water quantity
retention/detention areas. The County shall direct incompatible land uses
away from such large-scale wetlands.
Collier County shall allow for more intensive development to occur in Rural
Fringe Receiving Lands, North Golden Gate Estates, the Rural-Settlement Area
District, and the Urban Designated Areas subject to the land uses identified in
the Future Land Use Element, the Immokalee Area Master Plan, and the Golden
Gate Area Master Plan. These areas account for only 6% of Collier County's
wetlands. Except for tidal wetlands within the coastal portion of the Urban
Designated Area and wetlands that are part of an established watershed
management plan, the County finds that the wetland systems in these areas
are more fragmented and altered than those systems located within the
12 Exhibit B
Conservation lands, ACSC and NRPA Overlays, and Rural Fringe Sending
lands.
On a project.specific basis, wetlands and wetland functions shall be protected
through the following mechanisms:
(i) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland permitting;
(2) Vegetation preservation policies supporting CCME Objective 6.1 ;
(3) Wetland protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2;
(4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the
FLUE
(5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed
management plan, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element.
(6) land or easement acquisition.
(7) land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief,
or USDA grants for restoration.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 6.2.3 requires Collier County to implement a comprehensive process to ensure that
wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. The process outlined
within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive
development away from large connected wetland systems. High quality wetlands systems located
on private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation requirements,
or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship Sending Area
Designations, or through the Natural Resource Protection Areas or Sending designations in the
Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape
scale in Collier County are protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that
restrict higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the
remaining allowable land uses.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that provision (6) of the Policy be revised to include that the watershed management
plans contain designated areas to be protected from development so as to preserve habitat,
water flows, recharge areas and to prevent future flooding.)
[Post EAC and CCPC Workshovsand Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans.)
Policy 6.2.7:
Within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County shall rely
on the wetland jurisdictional detenninations and permit requirements issued by the
applicable jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed
Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such
wetlands. This policy shall be implemented as follows:
(1) For single-family residences within Southern Golden Gate Estates or within the Big
Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, the County shall require the appropriate federal
and state wetland-related permits before Collier County issues a building permit.
(2) Outside of Southern Golden Gate Estates and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State
Concern, Collier County shall inform applicants for individual single-family building
13 Exhibit B
permits that federal and state wetland permits may be required prior to construction
unless the proposed residence is within a watershed management conservation area
identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting
Objective 2.1 of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional permit is
required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The County shall also notify the
applicable federal and state agencies of single-family building permits applications in
these areas.
(3) Within North Golden Gate Estates and the Rural Settlement Area, Collier County shall
incorporate certain preserved and/or created wetlands and associated uplands into the
County's approved watershed management plans, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element.
The size and location of wetlands incorporated into the watershed management plans will
be based upon the approved requirements for such plans. The County may issue single-
family building permits within or adjacent to such wetlands, subject to appropriate
mitigation requirements, which preserve the functionality of the wetland within the
applicable watershed management plan. For a proposed residence which is to be located
within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management
Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element, the
appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit
(4) Collier County shall continue to work with federal and state agencies to identify properties
that have a high probability of wetlands and animal listed species occurrence. The
identification process will be based on hydric soils data and other applicable criteria.
Once this identification process is complete, the County will determine if the process is
sufficiently accurate to require federal and state wetland approvals prior to the issuance of
a building permit within these areas. The County shall use information on wetland and/or
listed species occurrence to inform property owners of the potential existence of wetlands
and/or listed species on their property.
(5) Within one year after Watershed Management Plans are accepted by the Board of County
Commissioners, Collier County shall develop and implement additional means to protect
wetland systems identified in each Plan for preservation or restoration. Means to consider
include innovative landowner incentives, transferable development rights, tax relief, land
or easement acquisition, state and federal grants, and enhanced regulations.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.2.7 stipulates that within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the
County is to rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by
the applicable Jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed
Management Plan preserve area.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUJ!Ust 11.2010 Workshop-
Suggesting that wetland mitigation occur within the same watershed.)
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption HearinJ!s - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans.
Further, mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determine by the BCC with the
adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.)
Policy 6.3.2
Impacts to sea-grass beds shall be minimized by locating boat docks more than 10 feet
from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks shall be sited to
impact the smallest areas of sea-grass beds possible, be no lower than 3.5 feet NGVD,
14 Exhibit B
have a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no
wider than 4 feet
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 6.3.2 stipulates that impacts to sea-grass beds are to be minimized by locating boat docks
more than 10 feet from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks are to be
sited in such manner as to impact the smallest area of sea-grass beds possible, and to be no lower
than 3.5 feet NGVD, have a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the
access dock be no wider than 4 feet.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshov -
Suggesting that a reference to the required maintenance dredging permit be inserted within the
Policy; and additional Policies be added, if necessary, to protect sea grasses from dredging
activities.}
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as dredging is regulated by the State of Florida and Federal government, not the
County. Maintenance dredging is generally allowed by these agencies. Mitigation may be
required and determined during permitting with the State and Federal agencies.
Seagrass protection issues are required to be addressed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission pursuant to the Florida Manatee Management Plan adopted by the
State in December 2007. The plan calls for implementation of a statewide seagrass management
plan, creation of an interagency statewide seagrass monitoring plan, and evaluation of the
feasibility of a rule for the protection of the state's seagrass resources.}
Policy 7.1.2
Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA Overlay, non-
agricultural development, excluding individual single family residences, shall be directed
away from listed species and their habitats by complying with the following guidelines
and standards:
(1) A wildlife survey shall be required for all parcels when listed species are known to
inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site or where listed
species are directly observed on the site. The survey shall be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FFWCC) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The
County shall notify the FFWCC and USFWS of the existence of any listed species that
may be discovered.
(2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be submitted for County
approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated
listed species are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed
species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses
away from listed species and their habitats.
(a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species
and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development.
Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats.
15 Exhibit B
Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish
buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human
activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be
provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and
encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings,
underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife
corridors
1. The following references shall be used, as appropriate, to prepare the required
management plans;
a. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, USFWS, 1999.
b. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region,
USFWS, 1987.
c. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus
polyphemus) Populations found on Lands Slated for Large Scale
Development in Florida, Technical Report No.4, Florida Game and Fresh
Water Fish Commission, 1987.
d. Ecology and Development-Related Habitat Requirements of the Florida
Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Technical Report No.8, Florida
Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991.
e. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of the Southeastern American
Kestrel (Falco Sparverius Paulus) on Large-scale Development Sites in
Florida, Nongame Techincal Report No. 13, Florida Game and Fresh Water
Fish Commission, 1993.
2. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS
and the FFWCC, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
3. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence,
such as denning, foraging or other indications, priority shall be given to
preserving the listed species habitats first, as a part of the retained native
vegetation requirement contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 this element.
The County shall also consider the recommendations of other agencies,
subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be
given to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the
greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site
adjacent gopher tortoise preserves.
(c) Habitat preservation for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) shall
conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and
Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also
provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical
protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a
public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and
the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent
with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to
the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management
plans shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain
activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities
during the nesting season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS
South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of
paragraph (3) of this policy.
16 Exhibit B
(e) For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat
protection plan shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters
and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat Where adverse effects cannot be
avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and
compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be
consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999,
subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus american us floridanus) may be present,
the management plans shall require that garbage be placed in bear-proof containers,
at one or more central locations. The management plan shall also identify methods to
inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and
humans. Mitigation for impacting habitat suitable for black bear shall be considered
in the management plan.
(g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management
plan shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are
preferred by the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) by directing intensive land
uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and
hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense
land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive
recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District shall be designed and managed using standards found in that district. The
management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted
uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain
fire-adapted preserved vegetative communities and provide browse for white-tailed
deer. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-
Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this
policy.
(h)ln order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that
nest along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall
limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and
landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. These requirements shall be
consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999,
subject to the provisions of Policy 7.1.2(3).
(i) The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater
than 10 acres.
(3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize
recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and
Wildlife Service in issuing development orders on property containing listed species.
It is recognized that these agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may
change the requirements contained within these wildlife protection policies and any
such change shall be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.1.2 provides guidelines and standards for directing non-agricultural development,
except for individual single-family residences, away from listed species and their habitats. This
policy does not apply to lands located within the RLSA.
17 Exhibit B
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to
remove the references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy; add a
general reference to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical
assistance, since the most current information used by these agencies should be used in
protecting listed species; and, delete the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such
mitigation is required by the FFWCC or USFWS.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUIlUst 11. 2010 WorksholJ -
Suggesting to add a provision in (e) to encourage the retention of old growth slash pines for
RCW nesting habitat.}
{Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as the Policy requires adverse impacts to active red-cockaded woodpecker
(RCW) clusters and their foraging habitat be minimized, and where adverse effects cannot be
avoided, to compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. Old growth slash pines may not
necessarily be located in the best RCW foraging habitat, depending on how impacted the site is,
and may be more sensitive to die off with habitat restoration efforts.}
OBJECTIVE 10.3:
Undeveloped coastal barriers shall be maintained predominantly in their natural state
and their natural function shall be protected, maintained and enhanced.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11, 2010 Workshop -
Suggesting that a reference to maps contained in the Land Development Code be added.}
{Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and AdolJtion Hearings - Staff Comment - The undeveloped
coastal barriers identified in the text of the Land Development Code and CCME Policy 10.6.1
are identified by the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System. A reference to the Federal
Coastal Barrier Resources System maps should be provided in CCME Objective 10.3.}
OBJECTIVE 10.5:
For undeveloped shorelines, provide improved opportunities for recreational,
educational, scientific, and esthetic enjoyment of coastal resources by protecting
beaches and dunes and by utilizing or where necessary establishing construction
standards, which will minimize the impact of man made structures on the beach and dune
systems.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop _
Suggesting to insert, "mangroves" after "beach and dune systems" or add another Policy to
address protection of coastal mangroves.)
18 Exhibit B
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
needed, as the undeveloped coastal barriers identified b the County and Federal Coastal Barrier
Resources System also include adjacent mangrove systems. Protection is also provided by either
conservation easements or Special Treatment overlay within the County. In addition, State and
Federal permits require minimizing the impacts to mangroves.]
19 Exhibit B
Staff Report
Presentation to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) for recommendation to
the BCC on the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA)
for sufficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in Section
163.3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan.
OBJECTIVE: Florida Statutes require all local governments within the State of Florida to
maintain comprehensive planning programs based upon an adopted local government
comprehensive plan. As part of this planning requirement, the local government must monitor
changing conditions and must use this information to guide periodic amendments to the local
comprehensive plan. Within Collier County the local comprehensive plan is the Growth
Management Plan (GMP), originally adopted by Ordinance NO. 89-05.
The periodic amendment process, which occurs once every seven years, as described in Chapter
163.3191, F.S., is a two-phase process referred to as the Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR).
The EAR evaluates the performance of the various Elements of the local government
comprehensive plan since the previous EAR-based amendments. It assesses the successes and
shortcomings of the various Goals, Objectives, and Policies included within the GMP and
designates Objectives and Policies which need revisions, modifications or deletions,
Additionally, the EAR is the primary means by which the local plan can respond to changes in
federal, state or regional planning requirements. It should be noted that for the 2004 to 2010
evaluation period for the 2011 EAR, there have been 57 GMP amendments processed by the
County. While not all of these amendments were sent to the Department of Community Affairs
for adoption, they were either publicly or privately submitted for processing and evaluation. A
fact that recognizes the contemplation on the County's part of what improvements are need to
assure the GMP is an effective blueprint for guiding future growth, but also accentuates the need
for the comprehensive review of the GMP to ensure there is agreement within the Plan's
individual elements.
Ultimately, the Objectives and Policies designated for adjustment in the EAR become the basis
of proposed amendments to the local government comprehensive pl~ the second phase of the
process. These EAR-based amendments, as reviewed by the Environmental Action Council
(EAC) and Planning Commission (PC), and subsequently adopted by the BCC, after found in
compliance with the Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., then become part of the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of the GMP until the next EAR is prepared in seven years.
BACKGROUND: On August 25 and 27, 2010 the CCPC conducted its EAR workshop in
which the policies and objectives of each of the GMP's individual elements was conducted. The
EAR adoption review should serve as an opportunity for the CCPC to confirm the Policies and
Objectives designated for modification and the issues raised are those discussed during the
August workshops and will be those recommended to the BCC within the EAR for adoption.
11 P it g ('
Collier County 201 1 EvaIuaton & Appraisal Report cepc Adoption Public Hearing
As noted during the August workshop, the adoption of the EAR is the first part of a two prong
process, during which areas of the GMP are evaluated for their effectiveness and if appropriate
designated for adjustment or change. The exact specificity of that change is not determined
during this first prong of the process, only that a change is needed within the various Elements,
Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the GMP. Post adoption of the EAR by the BCC in January of
2011 is when the specifics of the changes called out for in the EAR are composed and refmed
through the GMP EAR amendment adoption process. The County will have eighteen months
from the date or the EAR adoption by the BCC to adopt the changes designated by the EAR.
Understanding this bifurcated process provides a clear direction for what is being asked of the
EAC during the EAR workshop.
At the completion of the EAR August workshops with the CCPC and the EAC, staff presented
the post workshop EAR books to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and the various
other state reviewing agencies. In late October the County received the review comments which
have been attached as exhibit "A" to this staff report. The majority of the comments from the
DCA focus upon the need for further data and analysis regarding the major issues and their inter-
relationship to the specific goals of the GMP's various elements, as well as the effectiveness of
the elements as they relate to the major issues. The CCPC EAR Adoption books have been
updated to address the specific comments contained in the courtesy review letter.
It should be noted that the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) at their November 3, 2010
regularly scheduled public hearing provided a recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners to adopt the proposed EAR. The policies and objectives recommended for
modification by the EAC have been specified within the CCPC EAR Adoption book.
ORGANIZATION OF THE EAC-EAR ADOPTION BOOK: The presented 2011 EAC-EAR
book is organized into a single-bound report containing an introduction and three (3) major
chapters. These chapters are:
Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified
Chapter Two - Countywide Assessment
Chapter Three -Evaluation of Major Issues
Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified details the issues that were brought to the
process from the public during the "Public Participation" portion of the EAR process. Chapter
Two - Countywide Assessment is the individual review of each Element and Sub-Element of the
GMP and the Goals, Objectives and Policies that comprise each of those Elements or Sub-
Elements. Chapter Three - Evaluation of Major Issues are the issues agreed upon between the
County and the DCA. Chapter One and Chapter Three are both connected within Chapter
Two. (Bolded for emphasis) Within each Element reviewed within Chapter Two, staff has
referenced Objectives and Policies that are directly related to Chapters One and Three. For
example a public comment that is directly linked to Policy 1.6.1 of the Recreation and Open
Space Element (ROSE) will be recognized within Chapter Two, as well as Chapter One.
Additionally, Objectives and Policies that are directly related to a major issue will be specified
within Chapter Three, as well as within the Element review contained within chapter Two.
21 P a ~ IC
Collier eounty 20 II Evaluaton & Appraisal Report CCPe Adoption Public Hearing
As described above the structure of the EAR inter-relates all of the chapters contained in the
report. Within each of these elements, the pertinent comments from the August workshops with
the EAC and the CCPC have been applied to the related objective or policy, to provide
identification of both bodies' perspective, as well as comments offered by the general public.
Unlike the EAR workshop edition books, the EAR adoption edition does not contain the
evaluation of every policy and objective within the GMP, but rather only the objective and
policies within the various elements in which modifications are being suggested are included. It
should be noted that a few policies in which the CCPC and the EAC have taken differing
positions, these areas will be highlighted during the EAR adoption hearing and will be presented
to the BCC for final arbitration on the issue
FISCAL IMPACT: County staff undertook the preparation of the EAR in-house. The
Comprehensive Planning Department prepared the EAR with input and contributions from
numerous county divisions and departments. Direct and indirect costs have not been calculated
for the preparation of the EAR.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Pursuant to section 163.3187(6)(a), Florida Statutes,
"No local government may amend its comprehensive plan after the date established by the state
land planning agency for adoption of its evaluation and appraisal report unless it has submitted
its report or addendum to the land planning agency as prescribed by section 163.3191 ..."
Therefore, timely action by the EAC, CCPC and BCC adopting the EAR is necessary in order for
the consideration of future comprehensive amendments. Otherwise, Collier County will be
imposed with the statutory sanction that would prohibit amending its comprehensive plan.
REQUESTED ACTION: Staff request that the CCPC reviews the proposed policies and
objectives designated for change within the individual Elements, as directed during the EAC and
CCPC EAR workshops held in August 2010, and provide a recommendation to adopt the 2011
Collier County Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the Board of County Commissioners.
31 P a g <:
Collier eounty 201 1 Evaluaton & Appraisal Report eepc Adoption Public Hearing
Prepared By:
~~ Date:
Michael Bosi, AICP, Planning Manager
Comprehensive Planning Section
1\-lv-10
R. dByJ/1/1 \A,--n~ D t /(,,3-Z0iO
evJewe : ~..........,,(Y..,L.. a e:
. lam D. Loretfl, Jr., . ., Director
Land Development Services Department
Approved By:(j);A_ /I........ -?, ____ Date: JI- 110 - )0
N~dministrator
Growth Management Division
4 I I' a g <
Collier eounty 201 I Evaluaton & Appraisal Report ccpe Adoption Public Hearing
Exhibit" A"
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
D.EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
-Dedicated to making Florida a .better place to call home"
CHARLIE CRIST .
Governor
THOMAS G. PELHAM
Secrelary
October 15, 2010
The Honorable Fred W. Coyle, Chairman
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
3301 E_ Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
RE: Collier County Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report
Dear Chairman Coyle:
. _ The Department has completed a review of the Collier County proposed Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) and has enclosed comments and recommendations for your
consideration, including review comments from other state and regional agencies.
The proposed EAR makes progress in evaluating the comprehensive plan as part of the
EAR process. However, the EAR should be revised and strengthened to addressthe issues
identified by the Department in the enclosed review comments. lbis will ensure that the EAR
sufficiently addresses the requirements of Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (F.S.).
In part, the Department's comments focus on the need to revise the EAR to address: (1)
assessment of plan objectives for major issues; (2) assessment of corrective actions or plan
amendments for the major issues based on the assessment of plan objectives; (3) incomplete
information to address community-wide assessment requirements (revised population
projections; and changes in growth management laws sin~ 2008); (4) assessment of water
supply planning; (5) assessment of past reductions in land use density within the coastal high
hazard area; (6) assessment of the extent to which the transportation concurrency exception area
and transportation concurrency management areas have achieved their purposes; and (7) the
extent to which changes are needed to develop a common methodology for measuring impacts
on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing the concurrency management system
in coordination with the municipalities and county. The D~partment encourages the County to
make the necessary revisions to the EAR based on the enclosed review comments.
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD t. TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100
850-488-8466 (p) t 850-921-0781 (f) t Website: www.dca.state.fl.us
. COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2356 (pI 85CH88-3309 (I) . flORIDA COIIMlIIIIT1ES TRUST ~-2207 (pI ~21-1747 (I) .
. HOUSING AND COIIIIIUHTTY DEVELOPIIENT 8~79S6 (PI 850-1122-5623 (f) .
The Honorable Fred W. Coyle, Chairman
October 15, 2010
Page 2
Please note that a formal sufficiency determination was not conducted at this time; this
will be done after the EAR is adopted by the County, However, the review comments, if not
adequately addressed in the adopted EAR.,may serve as sufficiency issues. We bave also
included a copy of regional and state agency comments for your consideration.
With respect to any suggested comprehensive plan amendments identified in the EAR,
the Department's review comments do not constitute a compliance review of the proposed
amendments. EAR-based plan amendments suggested in the EAR will be reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Rule 9-J, Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.), when submitted as proposed plan amendments.
As the County prepares the adopted EAR, Department staff is prepared to further discuss
. the issues raised in the review comments, If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please contact Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 487-4545, or
Scott Rogers, Principal Planner, at (850) 922-1758.
Vz1X j;1// ~l1J
Mike McDaniel, Chief
Office of Comprehensive Planning
MM/sr
Enclosures: Review Agency Comments
cc: Ken Heatherington, Executive Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council
Nick Casalanguida, Interim Administrator, Community Development and Environmental
Services Division
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMENTS
FOR
COLLIER COUNTY
PROPOSED EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
1. The identification of major issues and, where pertinent, the potential social,
economic, and environmental impacts ofthese issues [Section 163.3191(2)(e)]:
The proposed EAR sufficiently addresses the requirement of Section
163.3191(2)(e), F.S., except with regard to the major issues of "Urban Development
Pattern" and "Intergovernmental Coordination" for which the EAR does not identify,
where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts. of the issues.
Revise the EAR to identify, where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and
environmental impacts relevant to the major issues of Urban Development Pattern and
Intergovernmental Coordination.
2. An assessment of whether plan objectives within each element, as they related to
major issues, have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated
. changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and opportunities with respect
to major issues in each element [Section 163.3191(2)(g)]; and, Any actions or
corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address
the major issnes identified and analyzed in the report [Section 163.3191(2)(i)]:
The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address the requirements of Sections
163.3191 (2)(g) and (i), F .S" for the major issues as follows:
a (Major Issue: Climate Change): The proposed EAR identifies many Comprehensive
Plan objectives/policies that are relevant to the issue of climate change. However, for
many of these objectives/policies, the EAR does not assess the following: (1) how has the
objective/policy been implemented over the evaluation period, including specific
examples of the implementation; (2) why the implementation has been effective or
ineffective in achieving the purpose of the objective/policy; and (3) based on 1 and 2,
why revisions are needed or not needed to the objective/policy, and identification of the
extent/nature of the revisions. Revise the EAR to include the assessment.
b. (Major Issue: Urban Development Pattern): The proposed EAR section titled "Major
Issues" does not address the major issue of "Urban Development Pattern." The section
titled "Major Issues does not include an assessment addressing: (1) identification of the
plan objectives related to the intergovernmental coordination major issue; (2) evaluation
of whether the objectives have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated
changes in circumstances have resulted in problems arid opportunities with respect to
intergovernmental coordination; and (3) evaluation of any actions or corrective measures,
including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address intergovernmental
coordination. Revise the EAR to include the assessment.
c. (Major Issue: Water Resource Protection): Part of the major issue pertains to
floodplain management programs and existing criteria. The proposed EAR section titled
"Major Issues" does not include an assessment addressing: (1) identification of the plan
objectives related to the floodplain management programs and existing criteria; (2)
evaluation of whether the objectives have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and
unanticipated changes in circumstances liave resulted in problems and opportunities with
respect to the floodplain management programs and existing criteria; and (3) evaluation
of any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are
anticipated to address floodplain management and existing criteria. Revise the EAR to
include the assessment.
d. (Major Issue: Intergovernmental Coordination): The proposed EAR section titled
"Major Issues" does not address the major issue of "Intergovenimental Coordination."
The section titled "Major Issues" does not include an assessment addressing: (1)
identification of the plan objectives related to the intergovernmental coordination major
issue; (2) evaluation of whether the objectives have been acbieved,and whether
unforeseen and unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and
opportunities with respect to intergovernmental coordination; and (3) evaluation of any
actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to
address intergovernmental coordination. Revise the EAR to include the assessment.
e. (Major Issue: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay): The proposed EAR section
titled "Major Issues" does not sufficiently address the major issue of "Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay" (RLSA Overlay) because of the following: (1) the EAR states
that, pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22, the County prepared two reports
(Report I in 2008, and Report II in 2009) evaluating the RLSA Overlay, but the EAR
does not include Reports I and II or a sufficient summary assessment of Reports I and II
for the Department to determine that the evaluation of the effectiveness of the RLSA
Overlay is sufficient; and (2) the EAR recommends revisions to Comprehensive Plan
policies for the RLSA, but these recommended revisions are not based on a sufficient
assessment of the effectiveness of the RLSA Overlay. Revise the EAR to include a
complete sufficient assessment of the effectiveness of the RLSA Overlay and to
demonstrate that the recommended revisions to policies are based on the assessment.
3. Population growth and changes in land area [Section 163.319i(2){a)]:
The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address the requirements of Section
163.3191(2)(a) and (i), F.S., because the EAR does not include revised population
projections for the new updated planning timeframe, which the EAR (Future Land Use
Element pages 37-38) suggests may be year 2025. The EAR should be revised to include
updated population projections to address the new planning timeframe.
4. Relevant changes in growth management laws [Section 163.3191(2)(f)]:
The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163.3191(2)(f), F.S.
because the proposed EAR section titled "Statutory Changes" does not identify changes
to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, since the year 2008. Revise the section tided
"Statutory Changes" to identify the statutory changes since year 2008.
5. An assessment ofthe extent to which the local government has been successful in
identifying alternative water supply projects and traditional water supply projects,
iD.cluding conservation and reuse, necessary to meet the water needs identified in
Section 373.0361(2)(a) within the local government's jurisdiction. An evaluation of
the degree to which the local government has implemented the work plan for
building public, private, and regional water supply facilities, including development
of alternative water snpplies, identified in the element as necessary to serve existing
and new development. [Section 163.3191(2)(1)]:
The proposed EAR does not include a section that specifically addresses the
requirements of Section 163.3191 (2)(1), F .S~ Revise the EAR to include a section that
very briefly a4dresses the requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(I), F.S.
6. An evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the
coastal high hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when
redevelopment occurs. The local government must identify strategies to address
redevelopment and the rights of affeCted residents balanced against public safety
considerations. [Section 163.3191(2)(m)]:
The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163.3191(2)(m), F.S.
Collier County has coastal high hazard area; however, the proposed EAR does not
include an evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the coastal
high hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment
occurs, and include in such an evaluation the identification of strategies to address
redevelopment and the rights of affected residents balanced against public safety
considerations. The EAR should be revised to include the evaluation.
7. An evaluation ofthe extent to which a concurrency management exception area
designated pursuant to Section 163.3180(5), a concurrency management area
designated pursuant to Section 163.3180(7), or a multimodal transportation district
designated pursuant to Section 163.3180(15) has achieved the purpose for which it
was created and otherwise complies with the provisions of Section 163.3180.
[Section 163.3191(2)(0)]: .
The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163.3191(2)(0), F.S.
Collier County has designated a Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas (South
U.S. 41 TCEA) 3D.d two Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (Northwest
TCMA; and East Central TCMA), and the proposed EAR does not evaluate the extent to
which these areas have achieved the purpose for which they were created and otherwise
comply with the provisions of Section 163.3180, F.S. Revise the EAR to include the
evaluation.
8~ An assessment ofthe extent to which changes are needed to develop a common
methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of
implementing its concurrency management system in coordination with the
municipalities and counties, as appropriate pursuant to Section 163.3180(10).
[Section 163.3191(2)(P)]:
The proposed EAR does not include a section that addresses the requirements of
Section 163.3191 (2)(P), F.S. Revise the EAR to include a section that specifically and
sufficiently addresses the requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(P), F.S.
-1-- -
--4
I
SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
October 14, 2010
Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and DRI Processing
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Collier County
Comments on Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)
The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the
proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) transmitted by Collier County
(County) for preliminary review. The District appreciates the opportunity to provide
water resource-related technical assistance during the County's evaluation of major
issues and comprehensive plan elements. The County has committed to working with
the District in updating the County's adopted Water Supply Facilities Work Plan as the
Lower West Coast Regional Water Supply Plan is updated. The District requests the-
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) consider the following recommendations in its
EAR sufficiency analysis:
Water Qualitv
. Retain the current language of Objective 2.2, in the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element, which requires that surface waters discharging into
estuaries shall meet Federal. State, or local water quality standards_ The
proposed change weakens the objective in providing protection to the County's
surface waters. The District looks forward to working with the County on
achieving water quality standards within the County's water bodies.
. . Include an objective and related policies describing the strategies (including
funding mechanisms) designed to achieve Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLS)
and Nutrient Loading Criteria established for water bodies in the County.
. llicorporate objectives and policies for coordinating with the State in its TMDL
program including efforts in assessing the verified list of impaired waters under
Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and any subsequent TMDLs developed for
those waters. This section should also address the planning and
implementation of any future Everglades West Coast Basin Management Action
Plans developed for water bodies with TMDLs in the Southwest Coast and
Interdrainage Area Planning Units.
3301 Gun Oub Road. West Palm Beach, Florida J3.W6 . (561) 686-8800 . FL W AlS 1-800-432-2045
M"d!i:og .A.dd:~~. Wc:lit P.lm ~{"h R ~'\41&4lJlO . www.sf.wnMi~_ ___ __
/ Mr. Ra~ Eubanks, Administrator
/ ~ .. .October14, 2010
Page 2
Ecosvstem Restoration
· Include objectives and related policies describing planned coordination with the
District in implementing the lake Trafford Critical Restoration Project, Lake
Trafford Watershed Management Plan, and Picayune Strand Restoration Project.
· Include a policy to emphasize land uses should not be inconsistent with adjacent
restoration programs, such as the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan
(CERP).
I
~
Flood Protection
. Incorporate objectives and policies for floodplain management in the Stormwater
Management Sub-Element. Floodplain management policies should include the
implementation of floodplain management regulations, including provisions for
incorporating compensating storage in development plans.
. Add a policy to the Immokalee Area Master Plan that provides a requirement for
detailed design segments and development of funding mechanisms tor the
stormwater management improvements identified in the recommended
alternatives of the Immokalee Stormwater Management Plan.
. Include a policy that addresses coordination with the District regarding the use of
and/or connection to Works of the District. The County must coordinate with the
District Right-at-Way Program tor appropriate authorization prior to making use
or connecting to Works of the District. The coordination includes but is not limited
to canals and associated overbanks and water conservation areas. Specific
requirements are codified in Chapter 40E-6, Florida Administrative Code.
Natural Systems
. Provide a policy that requires the development of management and restoration
plans for the Pepper Ranch Conservation Area (Pepper Ranch) to protect its
unique terrestrial biota and habitat. Management and restoration plans should
be completed prior to incorporating the Pepper Ranch into the County's regional
park system.
Water Supply
· Describe the programs in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element that
provide coordination between the County and the other water suppliers to ensure
that water supplies will be sufficient to meet projected water demands for the
unincorporated areas.
(..
,.
Mr. Ray..Eub.anks,p.dministrator
October 14, 2010
Page 3
The District offers planning and technical assistance to the County and the Department
of Community Affairs in developing sound, sustainable solutions to meet the County's
future water supply needs and to protect the region's water resources. For assistance
or additional information, please contact Deborah Oblaczynski, Senior Planner, at (561)
682-2544 or doblaczy@sfwmd.Qov.
Sincerely,
~~
l
Rod Braun
Director
Intergovernmental Policy and Planning Division
South Florida Water Management District
c: Mike Bosi, AICP, Collier County
Ken Heatherington, AICP, SWFRPC
Deborah Oblaczynski, SFWMD
Jim Quinn, FDEP
Brenda Winningham, DCA
~
~\\--. .
-=
-
====
~- .
~''l,.''
Florida Departl1lent of Transportation
CHARLIE CRIST
. GOYERNOR
10041 Daniels Parkway
Fort Myers. FL 33913
STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS
SECRETARY
October 8. 2010
Mr. Ray Eubanks
Plan Review and Processing Administrator
Department of Community Affairs (DCA)
Division of Community Planning
2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd.
Tallahassee, FL 32399
RE: Comer County Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) - FDOTRecommendations
and Comments
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District I, has reviewed the Collier County Proposed
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on
September 10,2010 in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statutes (F.S.) Section 163 and Chapter 9J-11
ofthe Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The department offers DCA the following comments and
recommendations fOT your consideration in review of the EAR.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (CrE)
EAR recommended changes to this element include the following:
. Renaming of certain element references, including Sub-Element, Goal, and Objectives and Policies
throughout;
· Policy 1.4 ....revision to introduce reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Green House Gas (GHG)
emissions as criterion for further prioritizing projects;
· Policy 1.5 ....revisions related to multi-Element revisions in a comprehensive effort to manage redundancy;
· Policy 2.10 .....considered for revision to allow for more-responsive fiscal management;
· Objective 3 ......minor revision timefranle reference;
· Policy 3.1....minor revisions associated with new terminology;
· Policy 4.1....minor re\ilsions to provide updated Statutory cite;
· Policy 4.2 ....revision to provide updated reference site;
· Policy 4.6 ....minor revisions associated with new terminology;
· Policy 5.1....minor revisions associated with new terminology (may need minor revisions to provide
updated Statutory cite).
The department has the following comments on these recommended changes:
FDOT Comment # 1: For clarification, Policy 1.5 (A) (1) (included in page 5) ofthe CIE should be revised
to specifically indicate that the peak hour Level of Service (LOS) standard of "E" does not apply to roadways
on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FlHS), Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), Emerging Strategic
\vww.dot.state.fI.us
,/
I
i
"
Mr. Eubanks
CoJlier County Proposed EAR - FOOT Recommendations and Comments
October 8, 2010
Page 2 of7
i
-------
Interrnodal System (ESIS), and non-state roadway facilities funded by the Transportation Regional Incentive
Program (TRIP).
FDOT Comment # 2: Please revise Policy 1.5 (A) (2) (included in page)l of the CIE to indicate that the
peak hour LOS standard of"D" does not apply to state arterials and collectors on the FIHS, SIS, ESIS, and
TRIP funded roadways.
FDOT Comment # 3: Consistent with Commenls # 1 and # 2, please re\ise Policy 1.5 (B) (included in page
5) ofthe CIE to indicate that FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for all FIHS, SIS, ESIS, and TRIP funded
roadways including 1-75 (SIS), S.R. 29 (ESIS) and S.R. 82 (SIS).
FDOT Comment # 4: The department recommends that Policy 1.5 (B) of the (IE be expanded to include
language indicating that the LOS standard on the ESIS facilities S.R. 29 (1-75 to the HendlY County Line) and
S.R. 82 (Hendry County Line to S,R. 29) should be LOS hC" consistent with the standards set forth by the
FDOT. Also, the LOS standards on 1-75 from the Broward County Line to S.R. 951 should be LOS "B" and
from S.R. 951 to Lee County should be LOS "D" corresponding to rural and urbanized area. respectively.
l.
TRANSPORT A TION ELEMENT (fE)
EAR recommcnded changes to this e\cmcnt include the foIlowing:
. Policy 3.4 ....modifications to provide more flexibility in policy:
. Policy 3.5 ....revision to eliminate time frame for achieving policy;
· Policy 4.9 ....addition of new policy to address HB697:
· Policy 5.1....revision to provide clarification and applicability of policy:
· Policy 5.3 ....modifications to provide expanded applicability of policy:
· Policy 5.5 ....modifications to provide for monitoring:
· Policy 5.6 ....modifications to provide for monitoring;
· Policy 5.8 ....modifications to improve effectiveness of policy:
· Policy 5.9 ....deletion based upon action accomplished:
· Policy 6.2 ....revision to tenninology within policy;
. Policy 6.3 ....revision to provide clarity to policy;
· Policy 6.5 ....revisions to update list ofprojects identified;
· Policy 7.3 ....modifications to expand applicability of policy;
· Policy 7.4 ....modification to recognize the requirement to implement HB697;
· Policy 7.5 ....revision to recognize on-going efforts of the policy;
· Policy 9.3 ....revision to provide clarity of policy;
· Policy 12.8..... deletion based upon transit systems exempt from concurrency.
The Department has the following comments on these recommended changes:
FDOT Comment # 5: Please revise Policy 1.3 in the Transportation Element to be consistent with Policy
1.5 in the CIE. Please see FDOT Comments # I and # 2.
FDOT Comment # 6: Please revise Policy 1.4 in the Transportation Element to be consistent with Policy
1.5 (B) of the CIE. Please see FOOT Comment # 3.
FDO T Comment # 7: The department recommends that Policy 1.4 of the Transportation Element be
expanded to include language indicating that the LOS standard on the ESIS facilities S.R. 29 (1-75 to the
HendlY County Line) and S.R. 82 (Hendry Count)' Line 10 SR. 29) should be LOS "c" consistent with the
\\'\\'W. dot.state.fl.lIs
r
//
/
/.(
Mr. Eubanks~-
ColIier C01mty Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments
October 8, 2010
Page 3 of7
standards set forth by the FOOT. Also, the LOS standards on 1-75 from Broward County Line to S.R. 951
should be LOS "B" and from S.R. 951 to Lee County should be LOS "D" corresponding to rural and
urbanized area, respectively.
FDOT Comment # 8: . Consistent with the CoIlier CO\L-lty Planning Commission (CCPC) comment from the
August 25, 2010 EAR Workshop, the department recolTh.llends that a time frame be determined to accomplish
Policy 3.5 of the Transportation Element. .
FDOT Comment # 9: The department notes that the E.U identifies the need to modify Policy 5.1 of the
Transportation Element to clarify the following terms and concepts: "Significant(v impacted road segment
. and deficient as it related to the County adopted 2%-2(' :-3?{j", "mitigation and how it should be applied', and
"what happens when mitigation allows a project (0 be uJ/;sistent u:i1h this policy". .
FDOT Comment # 10: The department recommends lb.t the terms and concepts clarified in Policy 5.1 be
consistent with the Florida Administrative Code and Florida Statues, and that appropriate references be cited
accordingly.
FDOT Comment # 11: The department notes that the r.,odification to provide for monitoring relating to
Policy 5.5 is mistakenly placed within Policy 5.6 and should be brought under Policy 5.5.
FDOT Comment # 12: The department notes that the ITi0dification to provide for monitoring relating to
Policy 5.6 is not found in the document and should be induded.
,
l.
I
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINA nON ELEI\I[~T (ICE)
EAR recommcndcd changes to this clement include the fol1o\\1ng:
· Objective 1.... minor revisions to include cenain key agencies;
· Policy L2 ....revision to reflect the Department name change:
. Policy 1.3 ....revision to reflect the Department name change;
· Policy 2.1 ....inclusion of the word "appropriate" so :hat agreements arc not limited to agencies within
Collier County;
· Policy 2.6 ....minor text revisions to update dates;
· Policy 2.7 ....minor text revisions to update dates and requirements;
· Policy 2.8 ....revision to correct SFWMD name;
· Policy 2.9 ....minor text revisions to include a comma and delete specific Florida Statute sub-section.
These revisions do not impact state roadways and, therefore. the department offers no comments.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE)
EAR recommended changes to this element include the foIIowing:
· Policy 1.4 ..... revise to allow for, but not mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace "shall" ldth
14may');
· Policy 2.1....revise to correct the CIE Policy reference;
· Policy 2.4 ....if changes are made to the Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion Area
density reduction factor as proposed, then re\.ise this policy to delete that reference;
· Policy 2.5 ....revise to reflect the existence of the TC~L-\s (perhaps replace "shall designate" onfirst line
with "has designated");
· Policy 4.5 ....revise to recognize the periodic update tperhaps replace the last sentence with a commitment
to periodically update the inventory);
w\\.w.dot.st2.te.fl.us
".
/
//~
/
Mr. Eubanks -.-_.....---
Collier County Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments
October 8, 2010
Page 4 of?
· Policy 4.7 ....revise to specify that a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or its agent
unless first approved by the Board, and to add reference to the ImlTIokalee Redevelopment Plan;
· Policy 5.3 ....revise to clarify .changes to the Urban designation refers to the new designation of lands as
Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the third line with "addition "J;
· Policy 5.14..... revise as necessary to reflect the changed statuS and contents of the Inter-local Agreements
as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the Public School Facilities Element;
· Objective 6.... revise to reference the establishment ofTCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace "are
hereby" in the last sentence with "have been");
· Policy.6.3 ....revise paragraph e) to begin with averb so as to follow the sentence structure (perhaps add
"Providing ,. before" Vehicular ");
. Objective 7 ......revise to reference reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, " on the second line ajier "policies. '");
· Policy 7.3 ....revisc for propcr wording (perhaps replace "alld their il1terconnection points" with "and/or
provide interconnectiolls(s) ');
· Policy 7.7 ....revise to update the Division name;
· Office and In-fill Commercial Subdistrict ..... rc\'ise criterion" I" regarding its applicability;
· Density Rating System - Residential In-fill.....rc\ise to eliminate Transfcr of Density Rights (TDR)
rcquircment;
. Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area..... delete and rcplace with a Coastal High Hazard
Area (CHHA) dcnsity rcduction factor, rcflect this on the FLUM, make correlating changes to all Growth
Management Plan (GMP) references to this provision, make correlating changes to the FLUM to modify
, the four partial residential density bands within the Urban Residential Subdistrict to complcte circular
brands, revisc both thc Roadway Acccss and Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Intcrchange
Activity Ccnter (residential density bands) bonuses to replace refercnce to this provision with CHHA
rcferencc, and rcvise thc Conversion of Commcrcial Bonus to prohibit its applications within the CHHA;
· Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict ..... revise to reduce allowable density for residential-only
projects within the CHHA to a maximum of 4 DU .-\ and reyise the Master Planned Activity Center
provision for clarity and possible substantive change;
· Rural Fringe Mixed Use District ..... revise to clarify that the District only applies to A-zoned lands, to
correct a miss-numbering in the RFMUD Sending Lands designation, and revise the Exemption provision
to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and to delete unneeded text from the Exemption title;
· Bayshore!Gateway Triangle Redevelopment On~r1ay......revise to delete subparagraph 8.e.;
· Future Land Use Map and Map Series ..... revise the CHHA boundary to correlate with any CHHA
boundary description change made in CCME Policy 12.2.5. revise to update and correct as necessary
underlying details of some FLUM series maps, reyise one or more maps to correlate with past map
changes on related maps, revise Stewardship Overlay Map to add additional approved Stewardship
Sending Area and to correct the boundaries of SSA. "47, revise FLUM to correct the depiction of certain
boundaries in the eastern portions of the County, and revise FLUM legend to depict the (non-Activity
Center) interchange feature;
. Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict......revise to delete paragraph "p";
· Davis Boulevard/County Barn Road Use Subdistrict..... revise to correct a date reference;
· Planning Horizon Issue..... revise the various planning horizons in the GMP to be consistent;
· DesignationIDistrict/Subdistrict Relationship.... revisions throughout to clarifY the relationship between
Designations, Districts, and Sub-districts.
~
I
WWW.dOt.5tatc.fl.us
,
Mr. Eubanks---._.
Collier County Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments
October 8, 2010
Page 5 of7
I
[
J
I
-1
I
I
I
!
i
The Department has the following comments on these recommended changes:
FDOT Comment # 13: (DeDsity Rating System - Residential In-fiU) It is not clear how much additional
development could occur should the elimination of the TDR requirement to qualify for the Residential Infill
bonus density occur. Should substantial additional development occur from this amendment, the department
recommends that an area wide traffic study be conducted and supporting documentation be provided to
establish that adequate capacity will be aYailable for new trips that will impact state facilities for the long-
term horizon year and short-term year 2015 conditions.
FDOT Comment # 14: (Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area) Please provide analyses to
establish the impact of deleting the Traffic Congc;;:ion Area Density reduction factor and replacing it with the
Coastal High Hazard Area reduction factor. Should substantial additional development occur from this
amendment, the department recommends that an Area Wide Traffic Study be conducted and supporting
documentation provided to establish that adequate capacity wiII be available for new trips that will impact
state facilities for the long-term horizon year and short-term year 2015 conditions.
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAl\ (GGA!\IP)
EAR recommended changes to the GGAMP Element i:!c1ude the foIIowing:
· Goal I .... reformatting; re-state to capture esser:ce of subsequent Objectives and Policies;
· Objective 1.1 ...... reformatting;
. Policy 1.1.5 ......may be dcleted;
· Policy 1.1.6 ......may be deleted or relocated;
· Policy 1.2.2 ......revisions to identify another specific activity able to benefit from alternative financing,
and rc-emphasizc balanced transportation planning efforts;
· Policy 1.2.4......reformatting;
· Objective 1.3...... reformatting;
· Policy 1.3.1 ......minor revisions to provide new departmental references;
· Objective 1.4..,... reformatting;
· Policy 1.4.1......consider expanding to ensure comprehensive and uniform application ofLDC;
. Objective 2.1......reformatting;
· Policy 2.1.1......delete (no longer applicable):
· Policy 2.1.2 ......minor revision to update tenninology;
· Policy 2.1.3 ......delete (no longer applicable):
· Policy 2.1.4 ......delete (no longer applicable):
· Objective 2.2 ......revisions to show remaining efforts following major project completion, and
reformatting;
. Policy 2.2.1......delete (no longer applicable);
· Policy 2.2.2 ......delete (no longer applicable):
· Objective 3.1......consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy in
demonstrating support for reducing V~IT and GHG emissions, and reformatting;
· Objective 4.1......reformatting;
· Policy 4.1.1......revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
· Policy 4.1.2 ......revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
· Policy 4.1.3 ......revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
W\\'W .dot.state .fl. us
(.
.r
Mr. Eubanks__ ._____~
Collier County Proposed EAR - FOOT Recommendations and Comments
October 8, 2010
Page 6 of7
. Objective 5.1......consider minor revision to show use of existing resource, revisions to delete mandate to
complete a date-specific task, re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policy, consider modification to
strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG
emissions, and reformatting;
. Policy 5.1.1......consider minor revision to show use of existing resource, revisions to better support its
Objective, and reformatting;
. Objective 5.2...... minor revision to be more inclusiye of jurisdictions under the Plan, and reformatting;
. Policy 5.2.1......minor revision for clarity, consider modifications to strengthen this Policy in
demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions, and refonnatting;
. Policy 5.2.2 ......revisions to delete mandate to complete adate-specific task, consider minor revision to
show use of existing MPO resource and consider modification to strengthen Ihis Policy in demonstrating
support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions:
. Policy 5.23 ......minor revision to show remaining efforts following major project completion;
· Objective 5.3 ...... consider minor revision to show use of existing resource, and refonnatting;
· Policy 53.2 ......minor revision to strengthen preservation efforts;
. Goal 6 ....consider modification to strengthen Ihis Goal, and its subsequent Objectives and Policies, in
demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions;
· Objective 6.1...... consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies in
demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions and revisions to illustrate expanded
planning efforts for more mobility options, and reformatting;
· Policy 6.1.1......minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts, and reformatting;
· Policy 6.1.2 ......minor revision to reflect continuing efforts between agencies;
· Objective 6.2 ......consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies in
demonstrating support for rcducing VMT and GHG emissions, and reformatting;
· Objective 6.3 ......reformatting;
· Policy 6.3.1 ......minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
· Policy 6.3.2 ......minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
· Objective 7.1......reformatting;
· Policy 7.1.3 ......revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
· Objective 7.2 ......reformatting;
· Policy 7.2.1......minor revision;
· Policy 7.2.2 ......minor revision to eliminate duplication of activities;
· Objective 7.3 ......re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies; consider modification to strengthen
this Objective and its subsequent Policies in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG
emissions, and reformatting;
· Policy 73.1 ......minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts;
. Policy 7.3.4 ......minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task;
· GGAMP Objective......new recommendation based on 2009 adoptions ofHB 697 and the County Energy
Audit & GHG Inventory;
· GGAMP Policy..... new recommendation to follow County Energy Audit & GHG Inventory;
· GGAMP .....assessment of Select Provisions;
I
.,
W\"W .dot.state .fl. us
t.
1
.,r
Mr. Eubanks X
Collier County Proposed JAR - FDOT RecommendatIOns and Corrnnents
October 8, 2010
Page 7 of7
. Estates - Mixed Use District (Conditional Uses Subdistrict) .... revision to encompass all essential
service uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area and expand the referenced listed zoning districts to
encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates;
. Estates - Commercial District (Randall BouJeyard Commercial Subdistrid)......revision to replace the
term "shopping center" with reference to C-2 uses.
These revisions do not inlpact state roadways and, therefore, the department offers no comments.
IM1\10KALEE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEI\IENT (L.\~lP)
EAR recommended changes to lAMP Element include the foIl owing:
. The lAMP Element of the GMP is currently in the process of revising and replacing each existing Goal,
Objective and Policy of the lAMP, as well as revising and replacing all future land use designations on the
lAMP and lAMP FLUM. The lAMP is expected to be adopted in the first quarter of20l1.The proposed
plan intends to increase dcnsity and intensity as the main mechanism to promote economic development
within the lmmokalee Urban Arca
The department has the following comments on these recommended changcs:
FDOT Comment # 15: The changes to the lAMP Element have the potential to create an increase in vehicle
trips on state roadway facilities. The department recommends that an Area Wide Traffic Study be conducted
and supporting documentation provided for the aboye referenced amendments to establish that adequate
capacity wil1 be available for new trips that may impact state roadways for the long-term horizon year and
short-term year 2015 conditions. Funding sources should be identified for improvements required to alleviate
all short-term failures. The improvements needed to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standard through
the ycar 2015 (short term) should be included in a Fiye- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. For long-
term failures, appropriate policies should be indentified in the CIE or Transportation Element of the
Comprehensive Plan and the needed improvements should be added to the appropriate plans and programs.
Additional Comment:
FDOT Comment # 16: Analyses and data should be provided for a1l state roadway facilities for the current
year (2010) and the long-term horizon year (2030) to ensure that all ESIS, SIS, FIHS, and non-state roadways
with improvements funded through the TRIP adhere to the adopted FDOT LOS standards and to the roadway
capacities found in the FDOT 2009 Generalized LOS Tables. If alternative capacities are used for any ESIS;
SIS, FIHS, or TRIP facilities, please provide supporting documentation for review showing the derivation of
the alternative capacity. Please provide policies/plans to remedy any failures projected for state roadways in
the horizon year.
If you have any questions, or should clarification or additional infonnation be needed, please contact me at
(239) 461-4300 or la\vrence.masscvril'dot.statc.flus.
Sincerely.
LLMlllmlgmb
....1
...-------- :.,/~-
(~~_~:..)~)ll;- ---___. ..
i
Lawrence Massey
District I Growth Management Coordinator
WWW.dot.Slate.f1.us
(.
\
~-
-
-
.~
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Dawn K. Roberts
Interim Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
September 29,2010
Mr. Ray Eubanks
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of State Planning
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Collier County Evaluation and Appraisal Report
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
According to this agency's responsibilities under Section 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-
. 5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document. Our cursory review indicates
that historic resources are addressed in the Countywide Assessment of various elements within
the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), but not specifically addresSed as Major Issues.
-j 1
In the Countywide Assessment, Policy 3.5 of the Housing Element addresses the Old Naples
area and the protection and preservation of the residential character. This policy has not yet
been achieved, but remains relevant. The recommendation is to add a due date so as to make
this policy measureable. Objective 5 of this element goes into more depth regarding historic
resources and indicates that the county and City of Naples will monitor all identified significant
historic resources annually to ensure that these resources are being maintained. This
objective is proposed to be retained, along with implementing policies. Implementing policies
include maintaining significant historic structures by means of the provision of technical
assistance; the review of land development regulations to encourage protection and
preservation of historic structures; local designation of significant resources; and potential
incentives to encourage preservation of historic housing. The last policy has not yet been
achieved as incentives to maintain and rehabilitate historic homes have not been adopted.
In the Conservation and Coastal Management Element assessment,. Objective 11.1 addresses
the protection of both archaeological sites and historic properties in the county. Implementing
policies considered relevant and to be retained include the continued enforcement of
development regulations; no loss of historic or archaeological resources on county-owned
property and protection of resources on private property; and fortuitous finds during
construction activities and the appropriate measures to ensure assessment and evaluation of
the resource, including preservation if appropriate. We note that in Policy 11.1.2.c, mention is
made of the excavation of archaeological resources by the Division of Historical Resources.
This agency does not conduct excavations on private property.
500 S. Bronough Street. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 . http://1YWw.fiheritage.com
[] Director's 0 fflee
850245.6300.-F'AX: 245.6436
o ArehaeologicalResea...."
850.245.6444 . FA.'<: 245.6152"-
./ Histonc P!!!5ervation-
850245.6333 . FAX: 245.6437
To
./'"
./
-~
-. ~"';'-,':.,
~~,:,~--;""':-"--
-' a
.. .
-
1
I
!
i
r
I
I
>i..... .,~.
- '."""
~. ----
Mr. Eubanks
September 29, 2010
Page 2
In the Future land Use Element, Policy 3.1.h. regarding land Development Regulations,
provides for the protection of historically significant properties, and lists the various means for
protection of these properties. This policy is proposed to be retained.
Our cursory review suggests that no major changes are proposed for the protection and
preservation of significant archaeological sites and historic properties.
I
,
I
I
; I
I ~
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp
of the Division's Compliance Review staff at 850.245.6333.
Sincerely,
~ tf. ~1/F1~
Laura A. Kammerer, Historic Preservationist Supervisor
Compliance Review Section
Bureau of Historic Preservation
pc: Ms. Brenda Winningham
i
, ,
to
c'
THE THIRD
EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT
BCC-Adoption Edition
Table of Contents
Section
Paees
Introduction
Chapter One - Public Participation
Chapter Two - County Wide Assessment
Population Growth & Annexation
Existing v. Anticipated Development
Vacant & Developable Land
Statutory Changes
Concurrency Management Methodology
Capital Improvement Element (CIE) - Summary
Capital Improvement Element (CIE)
Transportation Element (TE) - Summary
Transportation Element (TE)
Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element - Summary
Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element
Potable Water Sub-Element- Summary
Potable Water Sub-Element
Drainage Sub-Element - Summary
Drainage
Solid Waste Sub-Element - Summary
Solid Waste Sub-Element
Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element - Summary
Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element
Housing Element - Summary
Housing Element
Recreation & Open Space Element - Summary
Recreation & Open Space Element
Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) - Summary
Conservation & Coastal Management Element
Intergovernmental Coordination Element - Summary
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Future Land Use Element - Summary
Future Land Use Element
Golden Gate Area Master Plan - Summary
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
Immokalee Area Master Plan
i-xvi
1-35
1-2
1-32
1-4
1-20
1
1-2
1-10
1-2
1-13
1-2
1-21
1-2
1-20
1-2
1-9
1-2
1-9
1-2
1-13
1-3
1-13
1-2
1-23
1-6
1-54
1
1-12
1-2
1-23
1-4
1-27
1-7
Economic Element - Summary
Economic Element
Public Schools Facilities Element - Summary
Public Schools Facilities Element
Chapter Three - Major Issues
Water Resource Protection
Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
Rural Lands Stewardship Area
Climate Change
Affordable Housing
Concurrency Management
Urban Development Patterns
Intergovernmental Coordination
1-2
1-6
1
1-4
1-35
1-9
1-10
1-31
1-8
1- 34
1-15
1-5
THE THIRD
EV ALUA TION & APPRAISAL REPORT
ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN *
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES
I. Introduction & Process
In 1923 the Florida State Legislature created Collier County from a portion of Lee county. Collier
County is located on the southern gulf coast of the Florida peninsula, due west of the Miami-Ft.
Lauderdale area. Naples, located in the western coastal area of Collier County, is the most populous of
the three incorporated cities in Collier County. City of Marco Island, the second most populous
incorporated city, is a barrier island located on the Gulf Coast directly south of Naples. Everglades
City located southeast of Naples and the gateway to Ten Thousands Islands is the smallest of the three
incorporated cities both in size and population.
Collier County contains approximately 2,025 square miles of land area. The sub-tropical clinlate of
Collier County enjoys an average annual temperature of approximately 75 degrees Fahrenheit, with
January and June average temperatures of 67 and 82 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively.
The County is bordered by five counties: Miami-Dade, Broward, Lee, Hendry and Monroe.
Charlotte
Monroe
~
~~
--,,-
~
Collier County Government
A five-member Board of County Commissioners. elected for terms of four vears. governs Collier
County. Each Commissioner is elected by and represents a particular district within the County. The
Board of County Commissioners hires a County Manager. who oversees the County government
departments and staff. It is the function of the County Manager's office to head the daily operations of
the government in order to provide exceptional services to the citizens of and visitors to Collier
County.
Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, F.S., also known as the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning Act, requires all local governments within the State of Florida to maintain comprehensive
planning programs based upon an adopted local government comprehensive plan. As part of this
process, the local government must monitor changing conditions and must use this information to
guide periodic amendments to the local comprehensive plan.
The periodic amendment process, which occurs once every seven years, as described in Chapter
163.3191, F.S., is a two-phase process. It begins with the preparation, by the local government, of an
Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR). The EAR evaluates the performance of the various Elements
of the local government comprehensive plan since the previous EAR-based amendment process. It
assesses the successes and failures of the various Goals, Objectives, Policies and programs included
within the local comprehensive plan and provides recommendations for necessary changes.
Additionally, the EAR is the primary means by which the local plan can respond to changes in federal,
state or regional planning requirements.
Ultimately, the recommendations contained in the EAR become the basis of proposed amendments to
the local government comprehensive plan. These EAR-based amendments, as adopted by the local
governing board and found in compliance with the Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., then become part of the
Goals, Objectives and Policies of the local plan until the next EAR is prepared in seven years.
Collier County's first EAR was prepared and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July
16, 1996. The subsequent EAR-based amendments were adopted on October 18, 1997. The second
EAR was prepared and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 27, 2004. The
subsequent EAR-based amendments were adopted on July 28, 2006. This third EAR reviews the
performance of Collier County's Growth Management Plan (GMP) from July, 2004 to July, 2010.
*Note: "Collier County Growth Management Plan" is the adopted title for the Comprehensive Plan as
cited in Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. The two terms are in common use throughout this EAR and are
interchangeable.
E.A.R. Requirements
As required by Section 163.3191 F.S., the EAR must address the following aspects of the GMP:
1. The planning program shall be a continuous and ongoing process. Each local government shall
adopt an evaluation and appraisal report once every 7 years assessing the progress in
implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. Furthermore, it is the intent of this
section that:
(a) Adopted comprehensive plans are reviewed through such evaluation process to respond to
changes in state, regional, and local policies on planning and growth management and changing
conditions and trends, to ensure effective intergovernmental coordination, and to identify major
issues regarding the community's achievement of its goals.
(b) After completion of the initial evaluation and appraisal report and any supporting plan
amendments, each subsequent evaluation and appraisal report must evaluate the comprehensive
plan in effect at the time of the initiation of the evaluation and appraisal report process.
11
(c) Local governments identify the major issues, if applicable, with input from state agencies,
regional agencies, adjacent local governments, and the public in the evaluation and appraisal
report process. It is also the intent of this section to establish minimwn requirements for
information to ensure predictability, certainty, and integrity in the growth management process.
The report is intended to serve as a summary audit of the actions that a local government has
undertaken and identify changes that it may need to make. The report should be based on the
local government's analysis of major issues to further the community's goals consistent with
statewide minimum standards. The report is not intended to require a comprehensive rewrite of
the elements within the local plan, unless a local government chooses to do so.
(2) The report shall present an evaluation and assessment of the comprehensive plan and shall
contain appropriate statements to update the comprehensive plan, including, but not limited to,
words, maps, illustrations, or other media, related to:
(a) Population growth and changes in land area, including annexation, since the adoption of the
original plan or the most recent update amendments.
(b) The extent of vacant and developable land.
(c) The financial feasibility of implementing the comprehensive plan and of providing needed
infrastructure to achieve and maintain adopted level-of-service standards and sustain
concurrency management systems through the capital improvements element, as well as the
ability to address infrastructure backlogs and meet the demands of growth on public services
and facilities.
(d) The location of existing development in relation to the location of development as anticipated
in the original plan, or in the plan as amended by the most recent evaluation and appraisal
report update amendments, such as within areas designated for urban growth.
(e) An identification of the major issues for the jurisdiction and, where pertinent, the potential
social, economic, and environmental impacts.
(f) Relevant changes to the state comprehensive plan, the requirements of this part, the minimum
criteria contained in chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the appropriate strategic
regional policy plan since the adoption of the original plan or the most recent evaluation and
appraisal report update amendments.
(g) An assessment of whether the plan objectives within each element, as they relate to major
issues, have been achieved. The report shall include, as appropriate, an identification as to
whether unforeseen or unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems or
opportunities with respect to major issues identified in each element and the social, economic,
and environmental impacts of the issue.
(h) A brief assessment of successes and shortcomings related to each element of the plan.
(i) The identification of any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments
are anticipated to address the major issues identified and analyzed in the report. Such
identification shall include, as appropriate, new population projections, new revised planning
timeframes, a revised future conditions map or map series, an updated capital improvements
element, and any new and revised goals, objectives, and policies for major issues identified
within each element. This paragraph shall not require the submittal of the plan amendments
with the evaluation and appraisal report.
(j) A summary of the public participation program and activities undertaken by the local
government in preparing the report.
(k) The coordination of the comprehensive plan with existing public schools and those identified in
the applicable educational facilities plan adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35. The assessment shall
address, where relevant, the success or failure of the coordination of the future land use map
and associated planned residential development with public schools and their capacities, as well
as the joint decision-making processes engaged in by the local government and the school
III
board in regard to establishing appropriate population projections and the planning and sitting
of public school facilities. For those counties or municipalities that do not have a public schools
interlocal agreement or public school facilities element, the assessment shall determine whether
the local government continues to meet the criteria of s. 163.3177(12). If the county or
municipality determines that it no longer meets the criteria, it must adopt appropriate school
concurrency goals, objectives, and policies in its plan amendments pursuant to the requirements
of the public school facilities element, and enter into the existing interlocal agreement required
by ss. 163.3l77(6)(h)2. and 163.31777 in order to fully participate in the school concurrency
system.
(I) The extent to which the local government has been successful in identifying alternative water
supply projects and traditional water supply projects, including conservation and reuse,
necessary to meet the water needs identified in s. 373.0361(2)(a) within the local government's
jurisdiction. The report must evaluate the degree to which the local government has
implemented the work plan for building public, private, and regional water supply facilities,
including development of alternative water supplies, identified in the element as necessary to
serve existing and new development.
(m) If any of the jurisdiction of the local government is located within the coastal high-hazard area,
an evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density impairs the property rights of
current residents when redevelopment occurs, including, but not limited to, redevelopment
following a natural disaster. The property rights of current residents shall be balanced with
public safety considerations. The local government must identify strategies to address
redevelopment feasibility and the property rights of affected residents. These strategies may
include the authorization of redevelopment up to the actual built density in existence on the
property prior to the natural disaster or redevelopment.
(n) An assessment of whether the criteria adopted pursuant to s. 163.3177(6)(a) were successful in
achieving compatibility with military installations.
(0) The extent to which a concurrency exception area designated pursuant to s. 163.3180(5), a
concurrency management area designated pursuant to s. 163.3180(7), or a multimodal
transportation district designated pursuant to s. 163.3180(15) has achieved the purpose for
which it was created and otherwise complies with the provisions of s. 163.3180.
(P) An assessment of the extent to which changes are needed to develop a common methodology
for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing its
concurrency management system in coordination with the municipalities and counties, as
appropriate pursuantto s. 163.3180(10).
Dmanization of the EAR
The 2011 EAR is organized into a single-bound report containing an introduction and three (3) major
chapters. These chapters are:
Chapter 1 - Public Participation & Issues Identified
Chapter 2 - Countywide Assessment
Chapter 3 -Evaluation of Major Issues
Chapter 1 details the issues that were brought to the process from the public during the "Public
Participation" portion of the EAR process. Chapter 2 addresses required areas of analysis as required
by Florida Statutes 163.3191, as well as reviews of the individual GMP elements. Chapter 3 evaluates
IV
the eight (8) major issues, as agreed upon between Collier County and the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DCA).
Schedule
Completed Tasks To-Date:
. On August 26,2009, County staff attended a workshop, at the offices of the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council, in North Fort Myers to meet with DCA representatives and
representatives from other state and regional agencies to discuss the EAR process, learn of
issues considered important by the DCA staff, and to learn how neighboring local governments
intended to respond to issues identified by the State.
. On September 8, 2009, Comprehensive Planning hosted an EAR intergovernmental meeting.
The meeting offered an opportunity to fellow staff from local City agencies to identify and
discuss areas of concern with respect to intergovernmental items or issues common to fellow
governments. In addition, this meeting provided an opportunity to discuss sharing data, to
discuss new data that must be generated, and the analysis necessary to address those issues
identified as outdated, problematic, or where compliance has not occurred or is no longer
practical.
. On November 24,2009 the County's Draft Letter of Understanding was submitted to the DCA.
The County and the DCA agreed to the Final Letter of Understanding on December 4, 2009.
On December 15,2009, at their regular scheduled public hearing, the Collier Board of County
Commissioners approved the Letter of Understanding between the County and DCA.
. On January 25,2010, the County held its first EAR public participation meeting at the North
Naples Regional Park.
. On February 23, the County held its second EAR public participation meeting at the University
of Florida/Collier County Agricultural Extension Office.
. On March 15, 2009, the County held its third and final public participation meeting at the
Collier County main government complex.
. The varied locations of the three public participation meetings were designed to provide
opportunity to participate in the EAR process to the greatest possible number of citizens. In
conjunction with the public participation meetings, Comprehensive Planning staff coordinated
the preparation of the EAR with other County agencies, while gathering and analyzing data to
be used in the report.
. From January 2010 through July 2010, stafffina1ized the various sections of the Report.
. On August 11,2010, the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) held an EAR workshop at the
Collier County main government complex.
v
. On August 25 and 27, 2010 the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held EAR
workshops. The public discussions at these publically noticed workshops formed the basis for
a number of modifications to the report.
. On September 10, 2010, the County provided the post EAC and CCPC EAR workshop report
to the DCA and various state agencies for a courtesy review.
. On October 15,2010 the County received the DCA's comments based upon the post EAC and
CCPC EAR workshop report
. On November 3, 2010 the EAC recommended to the BCC to adopt the EAR adoption report
and to transmit to the DCA by unanimous vote.
. On December 7, 2010 the CCPC will hold recommended to the BCC to adopt the EAR
adoption report and to transmit to the DCA by unanimous vote.
. The BCC will hold its adoption hearing on January 31, 2011.
. The adopted EAR will be submitted to the DCA and the various review agencies within ten
business days, after changes approved by the BCC at its January 31, 2011 public hearing have
been incorporated into this EAR.
. Upon receiving the County's adopted EAR, the DCA will commence review of the report for
sufficiency with Chapter 163.3191. The tentative date for the DCA's Sufficiency Letter
determination is on or about April 27, 2011.
. Within eighteen months from the date the EAR is found in compliance by the DCA the County
will adopt the EAR based GMP amendments.
Before progressing to the individual assessments of the objectives and policies ofGMP and analysis of
the identified major issues for the 2011 EAR, the County would like to provide a brief description of
long range planning efforts undertaken since the date of the last EAR effort. These described efforts
were/are designed to improve the effectiveness of the GMP in attaining its stated goals within its
various elements.
Horizon Study
The East of County Road 951 Infrastructure and Services Horizon Study was a five year long planning
effort to assess the County's ability to accommodate growth within the County's rural eastern portion.
Prior to the initiation of the Study, the regulatory framework for growth in the eastern portion of the
County was established with the adoption of the Rural Fringe Overlay and the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay within the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Overlays were the
regulatory solutions arrived upon by the County and the state in response to Final Order No. AC99-
002. With the framework for growth in place and the consistent population increases in the 1990's and
the first three years of this decade, the Collier Board of County Commissioners at its June 29, 2004
meeting recognized the need for a comprehensive, long range planning effort to evaluate the county's
fiscal ability to accommodate growth permitted by the newly adopted regulations within the area East
of County Road 951. A strong emphasis was placed on the County's ability to provide the potential
Vi
necessary capital infrastructure and services while maintaining the financial feasibility as set forth in
the level of service standards contained within the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the
Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). To accomplish the task, the Horizon Study was
separated within two Phases.
The first phase, the Horizon Study Preliminary Report, was an effort of estimating the cost of
providing infrastructure and services for the amount of growth our adopted regulations would permit.
The Comprehensive Planning Department with the "2005 Build-Out Study" provided a projection of
the maximum number of persons that the GMP would allow for the County and in particular, the
portion east of CR951. From the population projections, the Study attempted to allocate cost
associated with the projected infrastructure and services outlay to serve that population, based upon
existing levels of service. Those infrastructure providers included: Transportation, Public Utilities,
Parks, Schools, Stormwater Management, Libraries, Emergency Medical Services, the Fire Districts
and the County's Chapter 189 Districts. The first phase, Preliminary Report was a twenty-four (24)
month long assessment that developed three levels of potential infrastructure and service provision
scenarios from the various infrastructure and service providing divisions/departments throughout the
County to satisfy the projected population. The Preliminary Report was presented to the BCC at a
May 24, 2006 workshop.
At the May 24, 2006 workshop, the BCC after hearing the presentation of the Preliminary Report and
the three levels of potential infrastructure and service outlay, directed for the second phase of the Study
to gain insight from the property owners of the Study. Moreover, the intention of the planning effort
was to better understand how the property owners in the area East of County Road 951 viewed the
potential growth within the study area, and how those residents felt that growth could best affect the
levels of service for governmental infrastructure and service providers. To direct the second phase of
the Study, the BCC created the Horizon Study Public Participation Master Committee. The East of
CR95 I Horizon Study Public Participation process, steered by the Public Participation Master
Committee was a 23 month long process of public presentations designed to inform the general public
of the specifics of the provisions of the various infrastructure and service providers, while
professionally polling and soliciting input from the residents of the Study area in relation to their
perspectives related to those identified potential growth outlays and the cost identified within the first
Phase.
As part of the public participation process, the Master Committee held two successive meetings to
discuss the issue of Transportation planning. Like all components of the Preliminary Study, the
Transportation component provided a working meeting to the Committee, which was held in
Immokalee, and a public participation meeting. These meetings were held in December 2007, and
January 2008. It was during these interactions between the Master Committee and the Transportation
Department that the need for a Bridge Study materialized. As part of the discussions with the
Transportation planning staff, the concept of increasing the mobility within the Golden Gate Estates
through a series of strategically placed bridges resurfaced. During the 2003 update of the Golden Gate
Area Master Plan, the concept of bridging strategic locations within the Subdistrict was promoted.
These direct conversations between the Master Committee and Transportation initiated the Golden
Gate Estates Bridge Study, which was designed to identify the prioritized locations for bridges which
would provide the greatest benefit to overall system capacity. This specific effort will greatly enhance
the county's effort in response to House Bill 697 and will contribute to reductions in overall vehicle
miles traveled (VMT), as well as green house gas (GHG) emission reductions.
Vll
In addition to the Bridge Study, the public participation portion of Phase II was comprised of the
development of the Collier County Interactive Growth Model (CIGM). At the inception of the East of
CR95 I Study, the BCC issued a policy directive that the study would not include a land use
component. The intent behind the directive was that future land use changes should not be the impetus
behind analyzing infrastructure needs in the area east of CR951. Although this intent was
fundamentally sound in concept, generally accepted planning practices and principles recognize the
need to link land use planning with transportation planning and other infrastructure needs. Based upon
this recognition, at the May 24, 2006 hearing of the Preliminary Report, the BCC directed staff to enter
into a contract with Van Buskirk, Ryffel and Associates to initiate the development of a land use
modeling tool, the Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM). The CIGM was designed to spatially
allocate projected population to assist with the timing and locational decisions related to infrastructure
and service provisions. On January 13,2009, the BCC officially adopted the CIGM as an additional
planning tool.
The resulting byproduct of the Horizon Study was/is:
I. An approved framework of position points established through the public process in regard to
level of service preferences regarding the infrastructure and service provisions for the County's
eastern rural area. These Position Points are expected to be utilized as a factor for
consideration by the BCC as they are evaluating land use decisions and policies within the
Study area
2. The developed Collier County Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM), which will assist III
determination of efficient locational decisions for infrastructure and service locations. It should
also be noted that the CIGM has been utilized by Comprehensive Planning as an additional tool
to evaluate market demand for amendments to the GMP. The CIGM has and is being utilized
by the County to evaluate the appropriate land use mix for the Eastern portion of the County as
new Towns and Villages are proposed within the Rural Fringe District and the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlays and identify inefficiencies/deficiencies within the proposed land use
allocation for the Eastern portion of the County.
3. The Horizon Study Oversight Committee, created by The BCC at their January 13,2009 Public
Hearing to ensure staff was maintaining and utilizing the CIGM in the most efficient and
effective manner.
4. The Golden Gate Bridge Study was approved by the BCC at their January 13, 2009 Public
Hearing and as funds become available the Bridge Study will establish the prioritization of
locations for system improvements. The improvements or new bridge locations are designed to
provide for a reduction in overall trip lengths within the Golden Gate Estates.
A final long range planning effort was initiated in collaboration with the Horizon Study and the RLSA
5-year Review Committee work, the Master Mobility Plan. That effort is currently on-going and will
be described at the clatter portion of the Introduction.
Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay 5- Year Review Committee
Collier County adopted the RLSA Overlay in the Land Development Code (LDC) as Section 4.08.00
on January 30, 2004 as the implementing regulation for the Growth Management Plan amendments
Vlll
known broadly as the "Rura1lEastem Lands Amendments" which were developed in response to
Administration Commission Final Order No. AC99-002, which required a "Rural and Agricultural
Assessment" and subsequent adoption of the Growth Management Plan amendment based upon that
assessment.
The BCC established the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Review Committee per Policy 1.22 of the
RLSA Overlay, which required a Five- Year Review of the RLSA. Accordingly, the BCC established
the ad hoc Rural Lands Stewardship Area Review Committee (Committee) by Resolution Number
2007-305A on October 24, 2007, and provided the Committee with the following functions, powers
and duties:
1. "Review data concerning the participation and effectiveness in the Overlay meeting the
Goal, Objective, and Policies in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management
Plan.
2. Review the RLSA Overlay and make recommendations to increase the effectiveness of the
Overlay.
3. Assist in determining the most effective venues and dates to hold public presentations; and
4. Assist in promoting public interest in the review process."
On May 27, 2008, the BCC approved the "Phase I-Technical Report" (#1 of functions, powers, and
duties of the Committee). The "Phase I-Technical Report" was a review of data concerning the
participation and effectiveness in the Overlay meeting the Goal, Objective, and Policies in the Future
Land Use Element of the GMP which is required by Policy 1.22 of the RLSA Overlay. The "Phase 1-
Technical Report" was presented and responded to by the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) and the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) prior to presentation to the BCC. On May 27,
2008, the "Phase I-Technical Report" of the Committee was brought before the BCC, accepted by the
BCC, and forwarded to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for its records in accordance
with the directive contained in Policy 1.22 ofthe RLSA.
While Phase I was the technical report on the programs accomplishments to date, the Committee also
generated a Phase II report which provided an assessment of the policies of the RLSA and potential
amendments to those policies to increase their effectiveness. The Phase II report was generated over
the course of twenty public meetings between March 4, 2008 and December 18,2008. The BCC on
December 2, 2008 provided direction to staff to facilitate the review of the Committee's Phase II
report before both the CCPC and the EAC. Accordingly, a combined total of eleven (11) public
meetings were held (6 CCPC public meetings and 5 EAC public meetings) between January 28 and
March 10, 2009 of which a total of 8 were public hearing dates before the CCPC (January 28 & 30,
February 5, 20, & 26) and the EAC (January 29, February 5 & 27). During these public hearings the
public was encouraged to speak concerning the Report. All meetings of the CCPC and EAC were
properly noticed public meetings, recorded with minutes taken, and most meetings were televised.
On January 6, 2009 the Committee issued its original2-volume "Five-Year Review of the Rural Lands
Stewardship Program" Report which includes the following:
a. Volume 1 of the Report contains the approved "Phase 1- Technical Report" (to the BCC on
May 27,2008), as well as the "Phase II-RLSA Overlay" review and recommendations; and
IX
b. Volume 2 of the Report contains the major appendices and support documentation which the
Committee considered when forming and finalizing its recommendations to the BCe.
Prior to its issuance of the original January, 2009 Final Report, the Committee held a series of public
meetings between November, 2007 and January 6, 2009 and received and reviewed information
provided by experts, heard from representatives of several organizations and individuals and summary
minutes and taped recorded documents were developed and maintained for public record. Most of the
Committee meetings were held in the Community Development and Environmental Services building,
while several of the meetings were held at both the new Town of Ave Maria and at the North Collier
Regional Park. These meetings led to the preparation of the Phase I and Phase II Reports. Most
meetings were well attended with audience attendance/participation usually ranging between 15 and 30
persons. All persons were given an opportunity to speak and/or present information.
There are no time specific requirement in the GMP RLSA Goal, Objective and Policies that any
amendments to the RLSA Overlay be made, but the Committee did arrive upon a list of modifications
to the program based upon the Original Report. It should be noted that the proposed amendments to
the RLSA Overlay were/are Committee-driven At the time proposed amendments to the RLSA
Overlay of the GMP have not been substantively reviewed by Staff for sufficiency, completeness,
supporting data and analysis, proper "wordsmithing", and consistency with the GMP, Florida Statutes,
and Florida Administrative Code. Moreover, the Committee was aware that not all of the data and
analysis to support the amendments has been completed. The extensive two year review of the RLSA
Overlay has formed the basis of the EAR review and analysis of the Overlay, which is specified as
major issue #7 within the letter of understanding between the County and DCA.
Adoption of the Ten-Year Water Supply Plan
In anticipation of the rapid population growth and increasing water demands facing the State, and the
potential threats to both the economy and natural resources, the Legislature amended the Florida Water
Resources Act (Chapter 373, F.S.) in 1997. The amendment required the five water management
districts to initiate regional water supply planning in all areas of the State where reasonable anticipated
sources of water were deemed inadequate to meet year 2020 projected demands.
The purpose of water supply planning is to develop strategies to meet future water demands of urban
and agricultural uses, while meeting the needs of the environment. This process identifies areas where
historically used sources of water will not be adequate to meet future demands, and evaluates several
water source options to meet the shortfall. As mandated by Florida water law, each regional water
supply plan is based on at least a 20-year future planning horizon, and a complete update of each plan
is required every five years.
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has developed a long-term comprehensive
regional water supply plan update for its planning area Collier County is within the Lower West Coast
Water Supply Plan. Previous water supply plans for the Lower West Coast were completed in February
1994 (planning horizon 2010) and April 2000 (planning horizon 2020), which the County utilized to
develop its 2002 Water Master Plan Update. The most recent water supply plan update is the 2005-
2006 Lower West Coast Plan Update that has a planning horizon of2025.
In 2002 the Legislature expanded the local government comprehensive plan requirements, known as
Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, to strengthen coordination of water supply planning and local land
use planning. One of the most significant requirements was a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work
x
Plan in order to project the local government's needs for at least a 10-year period, identify and
prioritize the water supply facilities and sources of water that will be needed to meet those needs, and
include in the local government's Five- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements the capital
improvements identified as needed for the first five years.
To date, the County's Water Master Plan has been considered the County's otIicial plan for water
capital improvements and the basis for the 5-year Capital Improvement Schedule contained in the
Capital Improvement Element.
Lower West Coast Planning Area Map
On February 25, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners adopted an update to the County's 200]
Water Master Plan. to provide an integrated approach for meeting the projected water system demands
up to the year 2022. The "2002 Water Master Plan Update" provided for comprehensive overview of
the entire water system, including emergency systems, water demand projections and demands and
proposed conservation and reclaimed water projects, and provided a plan for future water supply and
infrastructure needs to meet the requirements of growth, infrastructure renewal, replacement and
enhancement over a course of five years. This plan utilized population projections prepared by the
Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department that were approved at that time by the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and accepted by the SFWMD. Water demands were
provided at five-year increments to be consistent with the 2000 Lower West Coast Regional Water
Xl
Supply Plan. The 2002 Water Master Plan Update formed the foundation for the proposed County's
Ten-Year Water Supplies Facilities Work Plan.
During the State of Florida's 2005 legislative session, lawmakers revised state water law to include a
new statutory provision. Local governments within the Lower West Coast Planning Area are required
to prepare a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that identifies water supply projects, and
adopt revisions to comprehensive plans within 18 months following the approval of the 2005-2006
Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update.
On January 25, 2007, as part of the 2004 EAR-based amendments, and in preparation of the
anticipated Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, Collier County adopted language to
coordinate water supply planning with SFWMD. Modifications of various Goals, Objectives and
Policies (GOPs), as required by these legislative actions, were addressed through the GMP amendment
to the Potable Water Sub-Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the
Intergovernmental Coordination Element. The amendments referenced the 2002 Water Master Plan
Update and any subsequent updates as the appropriate document for the County's water supply
planning. On February 24,2009, the County adopted the Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.
The plan, and any subsequent updates, is the County's appropriate document for water supply
planning.
Floodplain/Watershed Management Plans
Beginning in 2004, Collier County developed its initial Floodplain Management Plan (FMP) as a part
of its participation in the National Flood Insurance Program's Community Rating System (CRS). The
FMP was incorporated into the County's overall Hazard Mitigation Plan. In 2006, Collier County
established a Floodplain Management Planning Committee (FMPC) under the direction of the County
Manager. The purpose of the FMPC was to provide input into updates to the FMP and annually
review the FMP Action Plan for completion of the action items. Immediately upon the establishment
of the FMPC, the County initiated a rewrite of the FMP to better address the requirements identified by
FEMA in the CRS Coordinator's Manual. That rewrite was completed by late 2007 and the new FMP
was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in December 2007. The FMPC typically meets
once a month. Throughout the year the FMPC reviews progress being made on the FMP action plan
items, discusses desired floodplain management program ideas, and has been working on development
and approval of a new Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance to comply with current Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements.
In addition to floodplain management as directed through the National Flood Insurance Program, the
County has also committed to development of watershed management plans to address water resource
issues (rainfall, runoff, flooding, water use, water quality, natural system needs, impacts of new
development, correcting existing problems, etc.). That work started in 2007 with the establishment of
a dedicated budget for development of the watershed management plans. A consultant was hired to
assist staff in laying out a framework of activities that needed to be accomplished, and the interlinking
of these activities as subsequent consultants were hired to accomplish the work by the end of 2010.
Initial work began with contracting for a unified aerial topographic mapping of the County (this did not
include the vast area of the Big Cypress National Preserve east of SR-29 which is all [ederalland and
not subject to change from development interests) using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR).
Coupled with that was the development of a detailed computer model of the vast network of publicly
operated drainage facilities. This modeling was coordinated with the South Florida Water
Management District by using their existing model as the starting model and providing more detail,
XlI
coupled with the new LiDAR topography, and updated land use. The County hired a consultant firm
to accomplish this work, and they are currently working on the modeling. The result will be an
analysis of the existing conditions, and development of alternatives to address the identified problems
as well as look toward the impacts of future development potential to ensure that additional problems
are not created. The process of developing the watershed management plans includes extensive
coordination with other local and state agencies along with the public through periodic public
meetings.
Energy Audit and Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report & Rebuilding Collier's Energy Use Task
Force
The report presented the results of an energy use/greenhouse gas inventory for Collier County, for
calendar year 2007, an accounting of both energy use and the amounts and sources of emissions of
greenhouse gases (GHG) for the community as a whole, encompassing the area within the County
limits, with a detailed look at Collier County government operations. Results are presented in terms of
standard GHG units, but their magnitudes directly reflect the relative importance of differing forms of
energy use in the County. The purpose of the inventory was to better understand the ways the County
utilized energy so that effective policies and programs could be implemented to reduce costs and
environmental impact. Additionally, the inventory provides a baseline against which future energy use
and emissions reductions can be measured.
The project was funded by Collier County Audubon Society, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida
and National Audubon's TogetherGreen grant program and utilized the software and protocol provided
by ICLEI, the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives.
The three primary motivations for the Energy Audit Report were:
1) Understanding patterns of energy use can lead to saving residents/taxpayers money.
2) It is widely accepted that fossil fuel energy use contributes to global climate change, the extent
of which will be critical for low lying regions like Collier County. Assessing and reducing
emissions demonstrates responsibility to present and future residents.
3) Increasing numbers of state and federal programs (and grant opportunities) require
municipalities to address climate change. By following the established ICLEI protocol, Collier
County joins twenty four communities in Florida and hundreds nationwide willing to take
action and thus demonstrate responsibility and accountability.
The report provided specific recommendation recommendations and next steps for County as follows:
1) Establish the following reduction targets: 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050.
2) Collate a summary of the baseline inventory, all energy savings related projects, together with
additional programs (including but not limited to those described below) into a comprehensive Collier
County Climate Action Plan. Identify within the plan how GHG reduction measures tie into other
County and regional efforts (such as the Master Mobility Plan, Coastal Management Plans and Land
Development Codes). Include an assessment of the impacts of climate change and energy management
in existing plans and codes to ensure the County anticipates and budgets properly for all potential
changes in Collier County through at least the next forty years.
3) Pursue the LFGTE project along with other waste management projects.
XIII
4) Continue government based work: i) building energy retrofits, ii) street lighting replacements to
high efficiency bulbs, iii) alternative fuel vehicles, and iv) promote the commuter services program.
5) Continue the community focused transportation programs such as traffic signal optimization.
6) Establish new community oriented programs to include: i) a community focused "'Be Green when
Green makes Cents" program, or equivalent and ii) a Green Business Program. (Additional programs
could be described within in the planned Master Mobility Plan and potentially be funded through
additional grant monies or other sources).
7) Carry out an energy use/greenhouse gas emissions re-inventory in 3-5 years to measure progress.
The Energy Audit was presented to and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners in November
of 2009. While the Board did not provide wholesale acceptance of all of the recommendations
contained in the report, the Board did, based upon the acceptance of the Report, create the Rebuilding
Collier's Energy Use Task Force. The purpose of the Task Force is to explore the recommendations
contained within the Report and bring suggestions back to the Board on the means to accomplishing
the energy efficiencies contained in the Report.
The work of the Task Force is on-going at the time of authoring this report. In June of 2010, the Task
Force began discussions with the Board regarding the development of a program to green up energy
use at homes and businesses throughout the County. The program the Task Force envisions would
take advantage of legislation called Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE), signed by Gov. Crist in
May 2010. PACE sets out a financing mechanism for local governments to create a pool of money
homeowners and businesses can tap for projects from electric car chargers to energy efficient
windows. Other possible uses for the money include insulation upgrades, solar panels, wind turbines
and energy efficient air conditioning. The full specifics and applicability of the program were still in
the development stage by the Task Force at the time of authoring this report, but the PACE program
and other similar efforts to increase energy efficiency within the County are expected based on the
Task Force's work within the Energy Audit. The future recommendations of the Task Force, once
approved by the Board are expected to intertwine with the regulatory environment of the County.
In a related effort, it should be noted that each of the Objectives and Policies contained in the GMP
Elements have been reviewed in relationship to House Bill 697 and the proponents of energy
efficiency. A copy of the Second Draft Rules for HB697 has been provided as supporting
documentation for the EAR workbook.
Master Mobility Plan
The purpose of the Master Mobility Plan (MMP) is to guide the need and location of land use, public
services (libraries, EMS, schools, etc), multi-modal transportation and various infrastructures while
protecting environmentally sensitive land, habitat and agricultural land with the primary objective of
reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), as the County progresses to build-out. The Board of County
Commissioners on July 28, 2009, provided approval to staff to seek a grant under the Energy
Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program, which were funds made available for the
first time under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The County received the
EECBG grant on September 8th and the BCC approved the grant on September 29th.
XIV
The MMP is intended to be a concise and practical plan that will manage growth in a sustainable,
financially feasible and environmentally responsible manner. It is anticipated that the plan will be
developed within a 24 month time frame. In addition, implementation of certain sub elements of the
plan such as local street network connectivity, signal timing and other projects that reduce greenhouse
gases and VMT will be initiated during the development of the MMP. This plan will inherently allow
for flexibility through the development and integration of Growth Management Plan goals, objectives
and policies as well as Land Development Code criteria that will help accomplish the following:
1. Provide needed infrastructure and reduce redundancies by the establishment and
incorporation of an Infrastructure Master Plan with the goal of reducing the VMT.
2. Strategically locate public services as well as private residential, commercial and
industrial development by the establishment and incorporation of a Land Use Master
Plan with the goal of reducing the VMT.
3. Incorporate multi-modal transportation alternatives by the establishment and
implementation of a Mobility Master Plan with the goal of reducing the VMT.
4. Preserve environmentally sensitive land, habitat and agricultural land by the
establishment and incorporation of a Wildlife Crossings and Habitat Preservation
Master Plan
5. Secure MOU's (Memorandum of Understanding) that define, validate and document the
commitments and expectations of Collier County Government and the primary
stakeholders and agencies.
The development and implementation of the MMP will result in job creation, job retainment, a
measurable reduction of fossil fuel consumption and less impact to the environment caused by future
growth. The MMP will help guide Collier County through its next phase of growth efficiently and
effectively. The investment in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure will
provide long-term economic and environmental benefits. Mobility investments and subsidies are
justified in that they will promote financial feasibility by:
1. Increasing and improving cost-effective, environmentally responsible mobility options.
2. Result in more cost effective transportation facility and service investments.
3. Increase transport system efficiency (reduces total costs or increase total benefits).
4. Reducing resource costs, such as the amount of fuel consumed per unit of transport, and
the amount of land devoted to transport facilities.
5. Significantly reduce VMT. The savings that results when motorist reduce mileage are
widely distributed throughout the economy.
The Planning Objectives for the plan are: Congestion Reduction, Parking Costs Savings, Facility Cost
Savings, Consumer Cost Savings, Reduced Traffic Accidents, Improved Mobility Options, Energy
Conservation, Pollution Reduction, Physical Fitness & Health, Land Use Objectives and Community
Livability
The MMP project scope is detailed below:
1. Build databases and GIS maps of existing and proposed stakeholder plans (utility,
parks, fire, protection overlays, etc.).
2. Prepare Infrastructure Master Plan
xv
3. Prepare Land Use Master Plan
4. Prepare Mobility Master Plan
5. Prepare Wildlife Crossings and Habitat Preservation Master Plan
6. Secures MOU's
7. Incorporate recommendations/changes resulting from public workshops into Draft
Vision Plan Map.
8. Conduct evaluation of effects of vision plan/land use scenario (placement of public
services) on transportation plan.
9. Document results of evaluation stating benefits and disadvantages.
10. Prepare Draft Vision Plan Report.
11. Submit Draft Vision Plan Report to Collier County for review.
12. Incorporate County staff revisions and recommendations into Final Draft Vision Plan
Report.
13. Provide support to County staff for presentations to CCPC and BOCC.
14. GMP Recommendations
15. Final Map Set
16. MOU's signed
By the time of this transmittal of the EAR in January 2011, the MMP will be 14 months into
development and the conclusion of the planning effort is fully expected to result in a number of
amendments to the GMP and the Land Development Code directly related to the reduction of vehicle
miles traveled and the corresponding green house gas reductions.
Conclusion
Each of these efforts have been highlighted near the beginning of the EAR document to demonstrate
the County's efforts and undertakings to gain increased efficiency within the co-ordination of future
private development, public expenditures, environmental protections and diverse broad based land use
allocations. A number of the lessons learned from these past and on-going efforts have influenced and
shaped this EAR report and have identified areas where the GMP could be amended to better
accomplish the goals, objects and polices contained within. The premise of everyone of the County's
efforts addressed within this section have been motivated by the same base motivation as the EAR
process, to ensure that the regulator environment provided for within the Collier Growth Management
Plan, is one that provides the County's citizens, businesses and natural systems the greatest chance at
long term sustainability.
xvi
Chapter One
Public
Participation
Chapter One - Public Participation
Engaging the public in the evaluation and appraisal of the Comprehensive Plan is challenging. While
County staff undertook several specific exercises to obtain input and feedback from stakeholders,
public outreach and involvement is really a full-time, year-round activity, requiring the planner to
continually be listening in all forums and settings, not just those devised for the EAR.
Described below are the specific events used to gain input and insight into the long term desires of the
County's citizens, business community, educators, regulatory agencies, etc. In addition to these
activities which were specific to the EAR, several other methods of obtaining input into the evaluation
and long range planning process were described within the introduction section of the EAR.
EAR Kick-off Meeting at the Southwest Regional Planning Council
On August 26, 2009, County staff attended a workshop, at the offices of the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council, in North Fort Myers to meet with DCA representatives and representatives
from other state and regional agencies to discuss the EAR process, learn of issues considered important
by the DCA staff, and to learn how neighboring local governments intended to respond to issues
identified by the State.
Inter-Governmental Kick-off Meeting
On September 8, 2009, Comprehensive Planning hosted an EAR intergovernmental meeting. The
meeting offered an opportunity to fellow staff from local City agencies to identify and discuss areas of
concern with respect to intergovernmental items or issues common to fellow governments. In addition,
this meeting provided an opportunity to discuss sharing data, to discuss new data that must be
generated, and the analysis necessary to address those issues identified as outdated, problematic, or
where compliance has not occurred or is no longer practical.
Meetings with County Departments
Early on in the EAR development process, planning staff met individually with most of the County
Departments. For the entire "life" of the County's Comprehensive Plan, most of the County
Departments have been actively involved in the front end of the planning process, including in the
development of policies, as well as in implementing the actions, programs and projects that fallout of
the Plan. It is the ongoing involvement at all levels of County operations in the comprehensive
planning process that have resulted in a Plan that is meaningful and realistic, and can be effectively
implemented. Although a formal meeting was arranged with each Department early in EAR
development, in actuality, the coordination and collaboration is constant and ongoing. In many cases,
Departments have recommended specific amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Co-ordination with Other Agencies
Staff interacted with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) concerning their
expectations for the County's EAR. Overall, SWFWMD's big areas of concern for Collier County fell
1
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
under the heading of Water Resource Protection and Climate Change. For Water Resource Protection,
the subject areas highlighted by the District were: flood protection and water quality, vulnerability of
potable water supply to contamination and demand rate for water supply projects. Under the heading
of Climate Change, strategies to protect water supplies and potential saltwater intrusion were
highlighted. For the assessment of the Economic Element of the GMP staff co-ordinated the review
efforts with the Collier County Economic Development Council, not-for-profit organization whose
mission is to diversify the economy and create high wage jobs
County and Departmental Website
The EAR webpage described the purpose and value of the Comprehensive Plan and went over the
EAR process, summarized meetings and events related to the EAR, and importantly, provided a
location for people to track the list of issues as it developed throughout the public participation
process, and the review schedule and results of the advisory board EAR workshops held in the summer
of 20 10.
EAR Public Meetings
Throughout the spring of 2010, planning staff conducted 3 workshops around the County. The
locations of the public meetings were distributed to the various areas within the County to provide ease
of access to a majority of the County's residents. The workshops provided people with the opportunity
to hear staff presentations concerning the purpose, scope and schedule of the EAR, ask questions about
the Comprehensive Plan and the EAR process, provide comment to what they felt was working and
what could be improved within the County, and to meet County staff from several different
Departments. While turnout at the workshops was not overwhelming, the input received from the
public, as well as municipal staffs attending the workshops, was important and contributed to the
development and refmement of issues and opportunities. Below is a listing of the Public Comments
received at each of the three public participation meetings.
The 1 st EAR Public Participation Meeting held at the North Naples Regional Park on January 25,2010.
The comments received from those in attendance have been grouped associated with the major issues
identified by the County and DCA. Following the issue cited will be the corresponding objective or
policy within the GMP elements to which it pertains.
For the comments received over the course of the three public participation meetings for the EAR, staff
did not attempt to generalize and/or categorize the comments, but rather, as mentioned, linked the
comment to the appropriate policy and/or objective in one of the GMP elements, where applicable.
Each public comment that is linked to a policy or objective will be noted in Chapter Two of the EAR.
This approach will allow the reader understand how the public comment relates to staffs analysis of
the policy or objective and what, if any modifications, revisions, deletions are being suggested. It
should be noted that a number of the comments received are either issues dealing with the
programmatic delivery of services provide for by the various departments/divisions of the County or
are observations from the individual related to issues outside of the purview of the GMP policies and
objectives. These comments have been designated accordingly.
The rt EAR Public Participation Meeting was held at the North Collier Regional Park _
Administration Building - Room A-6 on January 25,2010. below are the comments received.
2
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
· Encourage smart growth principles - mixed use, urban infill, walkable communities, alternate
transportation modes, and more green space. Objective 7 of the Future Land Use Element.
· Encourage "experimental" zoning - cluster housing in single-family zoning, guesthouse permanent
occupancy. Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element.
· County should create Walk only districts - by design or retroactively (close off streets) - and not
limited to commercial areas. Policy 1.1 of the Future Land Use Element.
· County should Reserve right-of-way for light rail. Objective 6 of the Future Land Use Element and
Objective 4 of the Transportation Element.
· Elements of the GMP need allow and encourage parking spaces for compact and micro cars - with
parking space credit. Land Development Code
· County should be recognizing LEED principles (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)
Green Building Rating System TM of sustainable green building and development practices and
eliminating code barriers to using alternative (green) building materials. Objective 6 of the
Economic Element.
· County should be recognizing LEED principles (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)
Green Building Rating System TM of sustainable green building and development practices.
Objective 6 of the Economic Element.
· Regarding Item No.2 (above) -Change the TDR program to require use of TDR's to obtain
additional density (cluster housing, guesthouses). Policy 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element.
· Elements of the GMP need to provide more incentive for non-motorized (or Mass Transit)
development. Objective 12 of the Transportation Element
TRANSPORTATION
· County not adhering to Greenway Interconnectivity Policy 4.2 of Transportation Element - the
County "shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by
constructing improvements identified on the 2030 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit".
Policy 4.2 of Transportation Element.
· County should be studying ideas for a 5- Year work program for pathways (no current program).
Policy 4.5 of the Transportation Element.
· County not adhering to Policy 4.7 of Transportation Element - bike lanes included in resurfacing
projects - the County "shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically
possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem". Policy 4.7 of Transportation
Element
· Intergovernmental cooperation involving the County not strong enough to achieve the intended
functional sidewalk/path Interconnectivity with school property (pathways). Objective 4 of
Transportation Element
· County should be studying ideas to allocate existing lanes to public transit, including dedicated
transit lanes, restricted SOY lanes, carpool lanes, etc... Objective 12 of Transportation Element.
· County not offering adequate access to Mass Transit, including enhanced routes, dedicated mass
transit lanes, etc... Policy 12.10 of Transportation Element
· County not doing enough to require mix ofland uses. Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element.
EASTERN LANDS ffiLSA - RFMUD)
3
Public Participation
January 2011 BCC EAR Adoption Hearing
· Adjustment to Transfer of Development Rights (2005) program not producing desired result.
Wholesale comment on Overlay
· Application process for severances & transfers not fair to all receiving agencies. Land
Development Code
· Need more specifics of Land Management Plan required for TDR credit No.3. Cost associated
with severance process prohibited. Land Development Code
· The County should develop a unified LMP for area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District Overlay
· County should be studying ideas for TDR's to be applied beyond RFMUD. Future Land Use
Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions
· County should be studying ideas to have a TDR education program. Programmatic
· TDR's should be open to be used in Urban Area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed
Use District Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions
· Look at Marion County TDR Program. Informational
· County should be studying impacts of RLSA potential development and their effect on Estates (i.e.
ground water, drainage, long-term effects). Policy 3.1 of Future Land Use Element - Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay
· LRTP not showing specifics ofRLSA. Informational
· County Government not providing awareness of development schedule of C.R. 951. Informational
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
.
County does not do enough to provide housing opportunities in close proximity to employment
centers. Policy 1.4 of the Housing Element
County does not do enough to encourage or mandate workforce housing component for
development. Policy 1.3 of the Housing Element
Waivers for impact fees for affordable housing projects. Policy 2.10 of the Housing Element
County does not sufficiently address low income housing (provide incentives). Policy 2.3 of the
Housing Element
County should provide land for affordable housing. Policy 2.10 of the Housing Element
County should be studying ideas for multiple units on single-family lots. Future Land Use
Designation Description Section - Density Rating System.
County should be studying ideas for lofts above garages, etc. to provide affordable housing
opportunities. Future Land Use Designation Description Section - Density Rating System.
Coordinate transportation network with location of affordable housing units. Policy 1.4 of the
Housing Element.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CLIMATE CHANGE
.
County should be studying ideas to target Green House Gas sources - besides transportation.
County should be studying ideas to address lack of energy efficiency plans.
County should be studying ideas to address need to plan for Sea Level Rise.
County should be studying ideas to access & connect State Parks with County Network.
.
.
.
WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION
4
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
· County should re-evaluate monitoring and maintenance procedures for nutrient
loads/pollution/water quality. Objective 1 of the Drainage Sub-Element.
· Improve public participation outreach and involvement for watershed management planning.
· The County needs better outreach and education with user-friendly terminology and use
illustrations.
· The County Watershed Management Planning needs to be holistic - more than just water.
The :r' EAR Public Participation Meeting was held at the University of Florida/Collier County
Agricultural Extension Offices on February 23, 2010. As providedfor at theftrst public participation
meeting the comments received from those in attendance have been grouped associated with the major
issues identified by the County and DCA. Following the issue cited will be the corresponding objective
or policy within the GMP elements to which it pertains, if applicable.
CLIMATE CHANGE
.
Promote and encourage safe bike/walk, including education to improve safety of bike/pedestrians
routes to reduce number of miles driven, especially school drop-off. Policy 4.2 Transportation
Element.
Reduce gaps between CAT stops. Explore feasibility of bike rentals at CAT stops to minimize
gaps in the existing networks of bike/pedestrians pathways. Programmatic
Increase mass transit availability (CAT). Policy 12.10 Transportation Element
Create bike/pedestrians pathways on canal banks to separate bike routes from vehicle traffic.
Programmatic
Do not use Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) reduction as an excuse to build more commercial in
neighborhoods where they were not planned nor vetted through a local master plan process.
Observational
Flooding as a result of climate change will affect current population estimates, County needs to
revise estimates. Observational
Include more bridges (Golden Gate Estates) to reduce fuel consumption and safety.
Policy 9.3 Transportation Element/ GGAMP Restudy
Create County-wide storm water management to address sea level rise. Policy 2.1.5 Conservation
and Coastal Management Element
Standards to address Climate Change need to be different for Golden Gate Estates (than urban
coastal zones). Observational
Allow low density areas in Golden Gate Estates. Observational
Make CAT cost more affordable. Observational
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TRANSPORTATION
· Public safety in the Estates has been ignored - Observational.
· Paving not followed through on local roads - Programmatic
5
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
.
Proposed Transportation Corridors thru Estates never contemplated by Master Plan and IS
inconsistent with the GGAMP. Observational
Vanderbilt Beach Road not necessary - inconsistent with GGAMP. Observational
Taking of homes for Vanderbilt Beach Road not necessary. Observational
Extension of Green Blvd and Wilson Blvd - not consistent with GGAMP.
GGAMP Restudy
Transportation - Mobility Plan will Change Rural Character. Observational
Bridge the waterways - instead of 4-6 lane roads to reduce miles traveled.
Policy 9.3 Transportation Element/ GGAMP Restudy
Multi paths should be developed separate of roadway. Policy 4.2 of Transportation Element.
Better linkage between Transportation Planning and Land Use is needed. Objective 5
Transportation Element.
Loop around Estates do not go through it to carry traffic. GGAMP Restudy.
Long Range Transportation Plan needs to be incorporated further into GMP -
recognize character of sub-districts. Objective 5 Transportation Element.
Transportation feasibility between sub-districts (RLSA, RFMUD, Estates) needs greater
coordination. Objective 5 Transportation Element.
Interior Commercial Development in Estates not consistent with GGAMP. GGAMP Restudy.
Eighth Street is a residential road - Fair Grounds should stop using for all events. Programmatic.
Estates Road Network needs to be planned for build-out, with street width and locations clearly
shown. Programmatic.
More ECO friendly landscaping and water efficient medians. Programmatic.
Widen Oil Well Road to State Road 29 and expand State Road 29. LRTP Programmatic.
Bridging of Wilson Blvd South should never be proposed. Programmatic.
1-75 interchange should not route traffic thru Estates. LRTP Programmatic, GGAMP Restudy.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Maintain viability of below market rate housing (particularly multi-family units) as transitional
housing. Observational.
Increase public assistance to affordable housing, possibly maintaining and administrating units
(existing) for present and future occupants. Programmatic.
Stop steering affordable housing into the estates. Partner with realtors to improve the Image
of the estates. Observational.
Maintain unoccupied housing units. Programmatic.
Increase focus of affordable housing to multi-family units from single-family. Programmatic.
Promote owner occupied units/rent-to-own units. Programmatic.
Develop a program to monitor absentee owner activities. Programmatic.
Waive impact fees for development of affordable housing. Policy 2. 7 Housing Element.
Reflect actual vacancy rates within CIGM. Programmatic.
Identify threshold of affordable housing within geographic area - and allow no affordable housing
in that location if thresholds crossed. Policy 1.4 Housing Element.
6
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
· Issue of affordable housing in Golden Gate Estates - Is it a good idea to explore potential?
Observational.
EASTERN LANDS (RLSA - RFMUD)
· Increase developer credits during RLSA revisions. RLSA 5- Year review amendments
Observational.
· Credits for underground assets? (Mining) RLSA 5- Year review amendments - Observational.
· Panther overpasses and underpasses (do they work)? Programmatic.
· Define primary and secondary panther habitat. Programmatic.
· LOSS for concurrency has not been proven by data and analysis for the new changes proposed to
the RLSA Overlay. Observational.
· Don't use Golden Gate Estates as thru-way for access to the coast. Observational.
· Don't build roads in advance of development and population. Observational.
· TDR program is inefficient. Observational.
· TDR program doesn't incent transfers sufficiently for developers. Future Land Use Element
(FLUE) RFMUD.
· Envisioned market for TDR's is non-existent (don't sell) Observational.
· Further incent transfers into urban infill (clause is unclear and needs to be expanded). Future
Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD.
· Provide further incentives from sending to receiving. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD.
· Rural villages envisioned within receiving areas don't provide sufficient commercial capacity.
Observational.
· Design and criteria for commercial locations within the villages isolate them from major
transportation corridors (making them not viable) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD.
· No new high speed (> 36 mph) roads built in RLSA and Rural Fringe Sending Areas (low speed
essential for wildlife preservation) Observational
· Commercial development on the interior of Golden Gate Estates goes against the Master Plan and
should not be allowed. Observational.
· The taking of homes instead of a golf course for the Vanderbilt Beach Extension should not be
allowed. Programmatic.
· Proposed RLSA amendments in Collier County did not address any concerns from DCA (7
written concerns from Tom Pelham). Observational.
· RLSA and RFMUD need to be compatible with Golden Gate Master Plan. Observational.
· When RFMUD was created, land use restrictions eliminated functionality of Golden Gate Master
Plan - Ex: Proposed location for estates commercial. Observational.
· RLSA has encouraged premature conversion of agriculture by:
Only low quality agriculture has been protected
By using eminent domain to provide transportation corridors
Refusing to address DCA concerns
Using Section 189 Districts to bypass Florida's Growth Management Laws
Observational.
7
Public Participation
January 2011 BCC EAR Adoption Hearing
· GMP Elements (like RLSA, RFMUD, and Golden Gate Master Plan) need to address the effects
they have on each other: Services, Transportation, Land Use. Observational.
· Where is the Master Watershed Management Plan? Policy 2.1.5 Conservation and Coastal
Management Element.
· Receiving Areas in the RFMUD need to be changed to allow services including business,
commercial and industrial can be located there to support not only the RFMUD, but adjacent
Golden Gate Estates and surrounding Communities. Observational
DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
· Fairground activities have escalated over time - both the frequency and intensity of events disrupt
the tranquility of surrounding Golden Gate Estates. Observational.
· Need Rural Standards for East ofC.R. 951 (development standards, roads, dark skies, etc.) Policy
1.5 Capital Improvements Element.
· In Golden Gate Estates, commercial development was [mostly] to occur on periphery, and
[interior] commercial was to be small scale/small magnitude. Peripheral commercial can be larger
in magnitude - that is acceptable. Observational - GGAMP Restudy.
· There should be a minimum residency period requirement to serve on Committee(s) that can
change, or influence change to, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), e.g. 5 years.
Programmatic.
· For development in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA), Golden Gate Estates residents are
not included/engaged - their input is not sought though RLSA development may impact GGE.
Observational.
· Proposed large commercial development at Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd. is out of
character, destroys aesthetics [referring to proposed GMP amendment petition CP-2008-1].
Observational.
· Staff involved in projects, plans, etc. need to have familiarity with the affected area. Staff should
live in the area or at least tour the area to get familiar with, and better understand, the area.
Observational
· More comprehensive approach needed when planning east of 951; GGE, RLSA, Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District (RFMUD) planning affects one another (drainage, roads, resources,
commercial and industrial services). Objective 4 Future Land Use Element.
· Need to plan for Golden Gate Estates long-term - consider build-out. Observational.
· Road corridors serving urban areas should be routed around rural areas so as to maintain
community character. Observational - GGAMP Restudy.
· Plans for east of 951 aren't flexible enough to accommodate change in growth rate.
Observational.
· The Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) is slow to react to demographic changes.
Observational.
· Need a Community Center within Golden Gate Estates. Observational.
8
Public Participation
January 2011 BCC EAR Adoption Hearing
· Need larger, more effective buffers around commercial development and County projects when
near/affecting nearby residences. Programmatic.
· Goals, Objectives and Policies (GaP's) of the GMP are not adequately implemented.
Observational.
· Need more public arenas for homeowners to voice concerns and opinions about topics/problems
affecting them, e.g. fairgrounds activities, water treatment plants, mining operations.
Programmatic.
· For Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, should take golf course land [for needed right-of-way], not
homes. Observational.
· During moratorium period (reference June 22, 1999 Final Order from Florida Administration
Commission), the County did not adequately address environmental issues, nor where/when/if
additional development would be permitted, including agriculture. Observational.
· Changes to the GGAMP should be the exception, not the norm. Observational.
· One or more East of951 Horizon Committee Members suggested urbanizing Golden Gate Estates.
Need to preserve the rural character, per the GGAMP. Observational.
· Should focus on SR 29/82 bypass as an industrial development center based in Immokalee Area.
Observational.
· Question whether RLSA development showing fiscal neutrality. Policy 4.8 RLSA Overlay -
FLUE.
· County policies encourage premature conversion of agriculture lands - when there's no need for
more residential lands. Observational.
· Planning period for GMP should be extended beyond 10 years. Policy 5.4 ClEo
· Provide concurrency with Transportation projects/plans. Policy 2.1 Transportation Element.
· Need a re-study of GGAMP - need to program for it and provide funding. Observational.
WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION
.
With a future unpredictable climate we cannot depend on previous historical levels of water.
Observational.
Develop new tools to predict future water availability. Policy 1.3 of Potable Water Sub-Element.
GMP elements need to consider the effects they have on each other and;
Available water supply
Waste Management (Landfills)
Drainage Observational.
If and when sea levels rise, what has the BCB done to keep water in the Eastern Collier area fresh
and apart from encroaching seas? Observational - Major lssue- Climate Change.
The County has let the residents down by acquiescing in the FIRM. Observational.
The County has failed to provide guidance to the people who will need a LaMA. Programmatic.
The County has failed to limit growth based on available resources. Objective 2 (Financial
Feasibility) Capital Improvement Element.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
Public Participation
January 2011 BCC EAR Adoption Hearing
· The County has failed to consider the cumulative effect of deep aquifer withdrawal.
Observational.
· The County has failed to develop a County-wide Storm Water Plan.
Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
· Canals not cleaned (algae and weeds cover canal along Frangipani Ave.) Algae sheet sunk
(causing future problems for fish and drainage). Programmatic.
· C 1 connector has better flow due to culverts being installed. Observational.
· FEMA elevations too large a burden during severe recession. Observational.
· Need more efficient water management of rural areas east ofCR951 to prevent flooding and being
rezoned to flood area. Observational.
· The new Flood Insurance is unacceptable. Observational.
· The County should protest FIRM. Observational.
· If flooding is a problem, don't allow additional buildings and asphalt (which can impact their
neighbors). Observational.
· Ditches and swales are not being cleaned and cleared; and driveways do not have proper culverts.
Programmatic.
· Standing water only 3 times ('95, '06 and '08) the same time the county took readings.
Observational.
· County Government has failed to implement the Watershed Management Plan into which all
other Construction and Coastal Elements, Goals and Objectives were to be involved.
Observational - Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
· Disappointed with County's failure to put the '89 GMOP LDC into place in a timely manner.
Observational.
· County has failed to address sustainabiIity and quality ofIife for all resources. Observational.
· The '89 GMP required that all aspects will be evaluated, watershed by watershed,
where is that guidance? Observational - Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management
Element.
· All development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated after each
watershed and its characteristics were developed. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal
Management Element.
· Failed to put into place a Watershed Management Plan. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal
Management Element.
· Dropping water table in GG Estates, GG Estates water resources are being used by City and other
areas without benefit to GG Estates. Observational.
· Re-use water - can it be turned into a drinking water source? Potential waste of re-use water is a
concern (If there is no demand, why pay for treatment?) Policy 1.1 Potable Water Sub-Element.
The 3rd EAR Public Participation Meeting was held at the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners BCC Chambers, 3rd Floor Administration Building on March 15, 2010. As provided
for at the first two public participation meetings the comments received from those in attendance have
been grouped associated with the major issues identified by the County and DCA. Following the issue
10
Public Participation
January 2011 BCC EAR Adoption Hearing
cited will be the corresponding objective or policy within the GMP elements to which it pertains, if
applicable.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
· Need consolidation of fire districts. Programmatic
· Better coordination between School Board (sitting) and County Government (locate schools where
infrastructure is available or planned). Same for EMS and Fire Stations - all facets of
infrastructure. Policy 2.6 Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)
· FEMA (under DHS), SFWMD, DEP, USACOE, Collier County Stormwater - need to coordinate
water resource management (surface and storm; water supply for municipal resources). Policy 1.4
Potable Water Sub-Element
· Better coordination between MPO and Comprehensive Planning (Land Use and Transportation).
Programmatic
· Better coordination between Parks & Recreation; and Libraries (co-locate). Policy 1.6.1
Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE)
· Better coordination between Schools and Parks & Recreation (co-locate). Policy 1.1.2 ROSE
· Need Rural Development Standards for non-urban areas. Policy 4.1 Future Land Use Element
(FLUE)
· Establish single authority for fire plan reviews. Programmatic
TRANSPORTATION
.
Integrate MPO and LR TP. Programmatic
Transportation Planning should be part of Master Plan. Observational
Education enforcement of laws and rules - 3' clear to bikes/pedestrians. Programmatic
Establish a minimum Level of Service for multi-model needs. Policy 1.5 Capital Improvements
Element & 12.8 Transportation Element
Develop bike share with transit. Observational
Formalize lime rock road policy. Observational
Strengthen 4.6 and 4.7. Policy 4.6 & 4.7 Transportation Element
Stress interconnection and continuity. Policy 7.3 FLUE
Adopt Rural Road Section Standards - Lighting, Landscape and Water. Policy 1.5 Capital
Improvements Element & 12.8 Transportation Element
Fair and equitable impact fees - Too high today/unfriendly/too busy and most cost effective design
and construction to reduce fees. Observational
Dead ends, (i.e. Vanderbilt Beach Road ends at DeSoto); build when population supports. Policy
1.2 CIE
MSTU should pay for own Administration Costs - 10%? Observational
Integrate road water management with land use and water quality parks. Programmatic
Pathways added to requirement for concurrency. Policy 5.1 CIE
Policy 5.1 - add pathways. Policy 5.1 Transportation Element
Add linear greenway parks to connect facilities. Programmatic
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
· Better facility and location planning for schools with coordination of county infrastructure.
Objective 3 Public Schools Facility Element
· As appropriate, add complete street/non-motorized. Observational
· Strategic Park and Ride Transit and Economic Analysis. Programmatic
· Red light enforcement may be contrary to tourism. Observational
· Educate public on Level of Service. Observational
CLIMATE CHANGE
· Increase Mass Transit instead ofroad widening. Policy 3.3 Transportation Element
· Increase bike lanes. Policy 4.5 Transportation Element
· Need to address sea level rise due to climate change. Observational
WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION
· County has no Flood Plain Management Plan. Policy 6.3 Drainage Sub-Element
· No coordination with Big Cypress Basin; SFWMD; FEMA and DEP (ex: - Picayune Strand
Restoration project was completed without consideration of the effect of the RLSA on the flood
plain). Observational
· Where are the Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan and the Comprehensive Water
Resource Management Plan? Policy 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element
· When are the efforts going to be:
Funded
Delivered
Scheduled
· Where is monitoring and maintenance of water resource? Potable Water and Drainage Sub-
Elements
· Watershed/Water Resource Management needs to be holistic
· Environment/Development/Conservation/Recharge/Recycle/Reuse/ Alternative Water Resources
Observational
· The County needs to establish a Stormwater Utility fee to address needed improvements and to
address EPA's implementation of the NNC (Numeric Nutrient Criteria). Observational & Policy
1.5 Drainage Sub-Element
EASTERN LANDS (RLSA-RFMUD)
· TDR Program not working. Observational
· Natural Resource Studies not detailed enough. Obsen1ational
· Not enough TDR's to use for density in Receiving Lands. Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
RFMUD
· Allow other uses on Receiving Lands (Non-residential). Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
RFMUD
12
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
· RFMUD Plan not compatible with Estates Master Plan. Lost commercial opportunities for the
Estates due to RFMUD Plan. Observational
· Consider modifying Rural Village Design Standards (Street Layout). Programmatic
· Consider convertibility of RLSA Density to RFMUD (SSA's to Receiving Lands). Future Land
Use Element (FLUE) RLSA & RFMUD
· Consider "Banking" ofTDR's for smaller parcels. Programmatic
· Allow conversion of some Receiving Lands to Sending. Future Land Use Element
(FLUE)RFMUD
· Engage Estates residents with eastern lands development. Programmatic
· Allow owners of Receiving Lands to convert a portion of those lands to Sending Lands in order to
get more TDRs to use on their remaining Receiving Lands. This process should be available
through a rezoning-like process rather than requiring a comprehensive plan amendment.
· Increase the TDR Credits formula for Base TDRs to more than the current one (1) base TDR per
five (5) acres. In designated Receiving Areas allow a density of greater than one unit per acre with
the use of TDRs and not limit density above one unit per acre to only Rural Villages. Non-villages
should be able to go up to 2 units per acre. Like the RLSA, rural villages should be able to go to 4
units per acre.
· Remove/modify the very detailed and unworkable requirements for development of a Rural
Village. Increase the TDR Bonus multiplier in a Rural Village to make it economically viable. At
the present time, the TDR program is too expensive for a higher dense village. As density
increases, average prices come down.
· Remove the minimum required purchase amount of $25,000 for a Base TDR and instead let the
market work to determine TDR prices.
· Protect existing TDR holders but drastically revamp the current program such that it is less costly
to develop in receiving areas.
· Encourage the establishment of mitigation banks in the Rural Fringe for listed species.
· Another option to consider is to establish separate overlays for each of the four distinct Rural
Fringe development areas, similar to the North Belle Meade Overlay which has its own set of
development standards.
· The current Rural Fringe provisions of the GMP already call for the County to consider the
feasibility of establishing a "TDR Bank" to be administered by the County or some other non-for-
profit government, or quasi governmental agency with the objective of making funds available to
support the TDR program by offering initial minimal purchase prices of TDR credits. The County
should create a TDR bank.
· Consider allowing owners of large tracts in the Rural Fringe the option of utilizing the standards
and procedures of the RLSA program.
· Allow for the ability to transfer a certain percentage of density credits from the RLSA to the Rural
Fringe.
· There is a need to have different more favorable treatment for owners of Sending Land parcels of
twenty (20) acres or less to facilitate their participation.
13
Public Participation
January 2011 BCC EAR Adoption Hearing
· Extend the early entry bonus another 2 years, due to the protracted real estate and economic
slowdown.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
· Create jobs to minimize the need for affordable housing. Programmatic
· Eliminate impact fees for affordable housing units. Policy 2.10 Housing Element
· Utilize existing housing stock for affordable housing, e.g. foreclosure properties. Observational
· Provide for various stages of transitional housing for varying income levels. Policy 2.2 Housing
Element
· Mandate affordable housing within all developments; residential and mixed-use. Policy 1. 3
Housing Element
· Provide public transportation proximate to affordable housing units. Policy 2.11 Housing Element
· Defer impact fees for affordable housing. Policy 2.10 Housing Element
· Provide density bonus incentives for the development of affordable housing units within mixed-use
developments. Policy 2.9 Housing Element
· Stop the perpetual loss of affordable housing units by prohibiting the conversion of those units to
market rate units. (Property owners receive the benefit of increased density for constructing
affordable units, but then these unit types eventually go away and become market rate units.)
Programmatic
In addition to the public comments received at the three designated public participation meetings, two
written pieces of public comments were received by the County and are provided on the following
pages.
14
Public Participation
January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing
A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
8)0 PARK SHORE DRIVE
TRIANON CENTRE. THIRD FLOOR
NAPlES, FL 34103
239.649.2708 DIIU;(.T
239.649.6200 MAIN
239.261.3659 FAx
banderson@ralaw.com
I~&)ANDRESS II
March 12, 2010
VIA E-MAIL
David Weeks, Growth Management Manager
Collier County Community Development Services
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FLl 34104
Michael Basi, Comprehensive Planning Manager
Collier County Community Development Services
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FLI 34104
Re: Evaluation and Appraisal Report fOT Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
Gentlemen:
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide public comments for the statutorily
required Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the Collier County Growth Management
Plan (GMP). Please include this in the record for the March 15 EAR workshop, which I will be
unable to attend. This letter concerns itself solely with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
(Rural Fringe). The State Road 846 Land Trust knows that some important changes are
necessary for a viable program in the Rural Fringe to conserve environmentally sensitive lands
and avoid urban sprawl by providing for areas where clustered development is appropriate and
encouraged. The Transfer of Development Rights program (TDR) was intended to accomplish
those goals, however, the program has not functioned as intended despite the additions of TDR
Bonus Credits. If the TDR program is to be continued and strengthened we suggest
consideration of some of the following:
1. Allow owners of Receiving Lands to convert a portion of those lands to Sending Lands in
order to get more TDRs to use on their remaining Receiving Lands. This process should
be available through a rezoning-like process rather than requiring a comprehensive plan
amendment.
2. Increase the TDR Credits formula for Base TDRs to more than the current one (1) base
TDR per five (5) acres. In designated Receiving Are~ allow a density of greater than
one unit per acre with the use of TDRs and not limit density above one unit per acre to
only Rural Villages. Non-villages should be able to go up to 2 units per acre. Like the
RLSA, rural villages should be able to go up to 4 units per acre.
3. Remove/modify the very detailed and unworkable requirements for development of a
Rural Village. Increase the TDR Bonus multiplier in a Rural Village to make it
CEvaANo Tou:oo AKRoN COl.UMllUS QNONNAn WASHJNGfON,D.C. TAllAHASSEE 0ItLAN00 ForrrMYERS NAPU'S FoKTlAt.Dauw.E
612283 v_OI \o00ooo.0784
www.ralaw.com
15
I .
David Weeks, Michael Bosi
March 12,2010
Page 2
economically viable. At the present time, the TDR program is too expensive for a higher
dense village. As density increases, average price comes down.
4. Remove the minimum required purchase amount of $25,000 for a Base TDR and instead
let the market work to determine TDR prices.
5. Protect existing TDR holders but drastically revamp the current program such that it is
less costly to develop in receiving areas.
6. Encourage the establishment of mitigation banks in the Rural Fringe for listed species.
7. Anothcr option to consider is to establish separate specific overlays for each of the four
distinct Rural Fringe development areas, similar to the North Belle Meade Overlay which
has its own set of development standards.
8. The current Rural Fringe provisions of the GMP already call for the County to consider
the feasibility of establishing a "TDR Bank" to be administered by the County or some
other not-for-profit government, or quasi governmental agency with the objective of
making funds available to support the TDR program by offering initial minimal purchase
prices ofTDR credits. The County should create a TOR bank.
9. Consider allowing owners of large tracts in the Rural Fringe the option of utilizing the
standards and procedures of the RLSA program.
10. Allow for the ability to transfer a certain percentage of density credits from the RLSA to
the Rural Fringe.
11. There is a need to have different more favorable treatment for owners of Sending Land
parcels of twenty (20) acres or less to facilitate their participation in the TDR program.
12. Extend the early bonus another 2 years, due to the protracted real estate and economic
slowdown.
Sincerely,
\(~ ,'\Ul:Jn.ix-~I#~'--
R. Broce Anderson
For the Firm
RBA/ca
612283 v_OI \ 00??oo.0784
16
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPT
2011 EAR - EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
REVIEW OF PUBLIC COMMENTS
FRAMING OF GROWTH PLAN AND ITS ELEMENTS FOR EAR REVIEW
According to the Department of Community Affairs, in their letter of understanding of Major
Issues dated December 4,2009, the director states that "I am confident that the EAR wiII contain
a comprehensive assessment and evaluation ofthe effectiveness of the County's Comprehensive
Plan in achieving goals related to the major issues, as wel1 as identifying the necessary EAR-
based amendments for achieving those goals."
The Major Issues to be addressed in the EAR are as fol1ows:
MI I. Concurrency Management,
MI2. Climate Change,
MI3. Urban Development Patterns,
MI4. Water Resource Protection
MI 5. Intergovernmental Coordination
MI 6. Affordable Housing
MI7. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA)
MI8. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD)
The Collier County Growth Management Plan Elements and related Goals Plans and Objectives
are outlined as follows:
El. Capital Improvement Element (CIE)
I Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 30 Policies
E2. Transportation Element (TE)
I Goal incorporating 12 Objectives incorporating 65 Policies
E3. Public Facilities Element [Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element (SS)
1 Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 22 Policies
E4. Potable Water Sub-Element (PW)
1 Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 28 Policies
E5. Drainage Sub-Element
1 Goal incorporating 6 Objectives incorporating 19 Policies
E6. Solid Waste Sub-Element (SW)
I Goal incorporating 3 Objectives incorporating 15 Policies
E7. Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGW AR)
I Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 21 Policies
E8. Housing Element (HE)
1 Goal incorporating 8 Objectives incorporating 50 Policies
E9. Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE)
I Goal incorporating 8 Objectives incorporating 27 Policies
EIO. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME)
13 Goals incorporating 47 Objectives incorporating 222 Policies
Ell. Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE)
1 Goal incorporating 3 Objectives incorporating 15 Policies
Page 1 of 10
17
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
E12. Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
1 Goal incorporating 7 Objectives incorporating 49 Policies
RLSA Overlay - RLSA Policies segregated in Future Land Use Element
I Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 76 Policies
E13. Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP)
7 Goals incorporating 17 Objectives incorporating 47 Policies
E14. Immokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP)
6 Goals incorporating 13 Objectives incorporating 41 Policies
E15. Economic Element (EE)
1 Goal incorporating 6 Objectives incorporating 37 Policies
Note: The Collier County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan as it currently stands
incorporates 39 Goals, incorporating 155 Objectives and 764 Policies. This summation is taken
from the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
I am hoping to bring light and improvement to the EAR Public Comment Process. I attended all
three EAR public meetings, and provided input and addressed concerns to staff as it developed.
The scope and outline of the Growth Management Plan was not addressed in creating a
framework for addressing Major Issues with Growth Plan Elements, and their Goals, Objectives
and Policies to bring perspective and focus to a means for opinion, measure, assessment and
evaluation.
Furthermore, there was no basis or baseline established for the public or the staff to effectively
provide qualitative or quantitative measureable assessment and/or evaluation of the effectiveness
of the County's Comprehensive Plan in achieving goals related to the major issues. As such,
public comment could not be provided in a means of measurement and assessment of goals,
objectives and policies - which is the purpose of the EAR - Evaluation and Appraisal Report
process. A means for framing a public perspective of the Growth Management Plan is missing
from the process, and a public/County basis of measurement, and qualitative and quantitative
measurement and assessment tools are also missing from the EAR process.
Certain comments pertaining to the issues, although relevant to the public's perspective, are/were
also not keyed to Growth Plan Goals Objectives and Policies. The Staff was then left to interpret
where the public comments on the Major Issues best fit under the Growth Plan's Goals,
Objectives and Policies for each and all elements. Interpretation of the comment, association and
consolidation of the public comments are therefore left to staff's interpretation of the public
comments and staffs determination and their association with the Growth Plan's Goals,
Objectives and Policies, and how they should/might be related to the Major Issues and visa versa.
As weIl, a revisit and review with the Public regarding staff's interpretation of the Public's
comment is not made part of the process, thereby closing the loop on Public Comment.
Some comments were labeled by Staff as "Observational" and "Programmatic" and "GGAMP
Restudy". There is a concern that these comments mayor may not be considered in the EAR
process because these concerns were not - in staff's opinion, interpretation and perspective-
attributable to specific Growth Plan's Goals Objectives and Policies. Such comments should
carry some value - in new policies to be considered and in ineffective policies abandoned or
made effective. The Public Perception must be accounted for as weB, especially relative to the
Observational and Programmatic labeled comments. These should translate to an accountable
action and measurable response.
Page 2 of 10
18
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
As weB, one of the Major Issues identified to be addressed in the EAR per the DCA Letter of
Understanding ignored - MI I. Concurrency Management. Instead, comments were requested on
the subject of Transportation without respect or reference to a Major issue as outlined in DCA's
letter, and without perspective or reference to Concurrency Management. Concurrency extends
wen beyond Transportation, and affects all County Services, infrastructure and GroWth Aspects.
Concurrency needs to also address Water, Sewer, Solid Waste, Schools, Public Safety, Parks and
Recreation, County Government infrastructure and an aspects of community and planning. This
was not the case in this EAR process.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Need for Effective and Measurable Job Growth Element
One aspect missing from concurrency and in Growth Management Planning overall is effective
and measureable private employment planning. Current efforts for job creation have been narrow
in scope and in some cases, expending an inordinate amount of taxpayer money without
substantial and measureable success in creation of high-wage jobs or diversification ofthe local
economy. The growth management plan should develop means and planning for the attraction of
a broad range of industries and coordinate location within the communities created. Such an
approach should be focused to minimize traffic and impacts across the County and contribute to
the sustainability and viability of a local work-supported approach to jobs within the communities
workforce locale.
Past planning has created massive residential housing developments with no other uses and no
other opportunities for job creation from within the created PUD. This fails the rest of the County
and increases demands for services without benefit of stabilization and broadening of the
County's employment base for an the new people contained in such residential-only
communities.
Re-evaluation of Planned Population Centers
ConceptuaBy, the Coastal Urban Zone - West of CR95 I - Are mostly built out, subject to infin
and minor long term population increases. As wen, the Estates care conceptually built out - the
approximate 2010 population of 27,607 (per the East of951 Horizon Study) is projected to grow
to 80,000 within the established limits of the platted subdivision. The driving impact of
population growth County-wide lies in the RLSA - the East of951 Horizon Study projects a
population in the RLSA of over 389,193 at Build-out in an area that currently has a population of
approximately 12,000.
The fiscal, physical and administrative demands of providing services, transportation and
infrastructure in a remote, disconnected and mostly undeveloped agricultural and wetlands
environment will create an inordinate demand on tax revenues, resources and County function.
The remote location for massive development and population will require an inequitably high
cost of developing transportation systems, infrastructure and connectivity are conflicting with
Agricultural preservation, conservation, reduction in greenhouse gasses, reduction in Vehicle
Miles Traveled (VMTs) and other Goals Objectives and Policies found in non-RLSA aspects of
the Growth Management Plan. Reconsideration should be made relative to the cost and impacts
of such remote development, and such review should be made on a County-wide and fiscal basis
equitable to all communities ofthe County.
Page 3 of 10
19
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
Demand for communities in such a remote location as the RLSA should be challenged and/or re-
evaluated. Attractions and assets that make CoIIier County a demand location - access to the
beach, proximity to Interstate Highway system, quality transportation systems, proximity to
International Airport, convenient attractive communities -lose much luster and attraction in
remote rural locations disconnected from the urban coastal zone. A study of Ave Maria's
successes and failures might well reveal some of the causes for its current challenges regardless
of the current economic downturn.
Engaging the Community, Politicizing Growth Management, Unilateral Decision-making
The perspectives of some suggest that the planning and decision processes are politicized.
Decisions are made regardless of Staff recommendations and Planning Commission
recommendations. Engagement of communities affected are limited to 3-minute speeches at
public hearings and the efforts of several organizations to involve their communities in the
process and decisions are secondary. Efforts are need to be taken to change the process and
attitudes by actively and effectively engaging the communities affected. Stakeholders typically
include land-owners, abutters and developers. Various organizations involved in the interest of
the future of their community should be considered stakeholders as well.
Over many years, numerous contentious projects have been pushed through the community
without engagement and endearment of the residents. This perspective is the basis of the current
fight for Amendment 4 - the vision of the Community was being created without the Community.
Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension was promoted as necessary to the Estates community and not
for the purposes of the private communities planned for East of Des So to (Big Cypress/Ave
Maria). For years, County Commissioners and Staff denied the fact that VBR Extension was to
serve the RLSA populations. Decisions were made and properties were taken, and alternative
solutions to traffic were not pursued and effectively ignored. Transportation engagement was not.
Stevie Tomato's fiasco was a failure in the planning and approval process that misplaced a
commercial operation in direct conflict with residential peace, privacy and quiet enjoyment.
Similar approaches were made to accelerate the widening of Oil WeIl Road. Work was
accelerated and funded prior to the realization of a projected population and prior to the coIlection
of assessable Impact Fees required prior to the funding and construction of Oil WeIl Road. When
the widening of Oil WeIl Road was approved even without concurrency, a middle section of the
road was deferred, promoted as a cost-savings measure, but truthfuIly associated with the
realignment of Randall Blvd and that section of Oil Well Road to meet in the proposed future
Town Center of Big Cypress. This re-alignment is not even depicted on the 2030 LRTP, yet is
widely known.
Such politicizing, posturing and misrepresentations have led to skepticism, cynicism and mistrust
of the planning process and decisions that come out of it. In some cases, private interests are
circumventing and manipulating a public process and the fiscal impacts to the public are
committed to without buy-in and support, and in some cases - against the will and desires of the
Communities affected. The mantra of Growth Pays for Growth has been a hard fiscal lesson - and
its untruth has been exposed.
Page 4 of 10
20
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
Transportation disconnection from Growth Management
Another concern Transportation has long been disconnected from the Growth Management
process. Decisions on future roads are made outside of Growth Management processes through
separate and disconnected MPO processes. One example is the 2030 Transportation Plan, which
when overlayed with RLSA population projections shows high density RLSA areas of Big
Cypress (4,000 - 10,000 per sq mile per 2030 Population projection maps) being served solely by
a Randall Blvd/Oil Well Road intersection. No road systems are conceptually represented within
this projected densely populated area east of DeSoto Blvd.
As well, is an issue with a future 1-75 interchange between SR29 and CR951. At one point, the
proposed interchange was promoted and presented in public meetings to serve the future Town of
Big Cypress, and the interchange would be located from 1-75 east of DeSoto north to the future
Town of Big Cypress. This seemed to make good sense - the major population projected in Big
Cypress would have direct access to 1-75 on a limited access roadway. More recently, an effort by
the Transportation Department unilaterally narrowed the focus to three choices of interchange
design for Everglades Blvd as the location of the Interchange. Transportation removed the Big
Cypress interchange from presentation, option and discussion. The change to Everglades Blvd as
the 1-75 interchange will translate to hundreds eminent domain takings and hundreds of
residential driveways accessing onto on a major evacuation route. Such decisions cannot be
rushed based solely on time-constrained (immediate availability) of Federal Funding for
Interchange Design. That approach is short-termed and short-sighted. (Note that Policy 6.1.2 of
the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to initiate a study of a potential interchange in the vicinitv of 1-
75 and Everglades Blvd. The County will Continue to implement a study of a potential
interchange in the vicinitv ofI-75 and Everglades Blvd.) 1 suggest the language should be
changed to "a potential eastern interchange along the 1-75 Corridor" to express the true needs and
intent, especiaIIy relative to the major populations projected in the RLSA area.
As weII, a suggestion by a member at a civic association meeting where Emergency Management
Director Dan Summers was to ensure that an emergency egress at Everglades Blvd and 1-75
existed, or for minimal expense - could be created in short time. This comment was made as an
Emergency Management Catastrophe Preparation goal and that such an access was regardless of
any 1-75 Interchange now or in the future - and it was suggested as a Temporary Emergency-
Only Evacuation Egress from Everglades Blvd to 1-75 to be prepared for use in case of
catastrophic emergency. Civic suggestions for proactive emergency preparedness have since been
manipulated and retranslated as a desire for an Everglades/I-75 Interchange. (Reference Policy
7.3.1) 1 suggest this policy is relevant and action needed to be taken to achieve item b. as a
minimum. The bridge study promotes local connectivity and egress, and the Improved emergency
access from Everglades Blvd to 1-75 is a critical evacuation egress point that needs to be opened
in catastrophic emergencies like wildfire, hurricanes and other natural disasters.
The whole 1-75/Everglades Interchange needs to be reconsidered and a proper comprehensive
look at the 1-75 Corridor and its future interchanges. The review should be an 1-75 Corridor
Interchange Study, and not specific to Everglades Blvd.
Page 5 of 10
21
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
Private Water and Sewer in the Estates
During the EAC forum for the EAR, the Chairwoman requested that consideration be made for
public utilities in the Estates as a means for protecting water resources. Similar comments were
made by the Chair of the East of951 Horizon Oversight Committee. The implication of these
comments is that septic systems are undesirable and incapable of sustainability, and that only a
public system can protect the water resources.
The East of951 Horizon Study explored the cost and feasibility of utilities in the Estates and the
public response was against public utilities in the Estates, both on a cost basis and a principle
basis that private systems are effective and sustainable, efficient and scientifically viable.
Together with an effort to incentivize joining of non-conforming smaIl lots to conforming lots, a
viable low density sustainable green community can flourish without urbanization and public
utilities. Given some people's arguments against the existence of septic systems, one must stiII
consider as weIl that bears do stiII "go" in the woods.
Rural Standards vs. Urban Standards
One thing lost in the process of CoIIier County Growth Management is that there are no rural
community or development standards. Densities and setbacks and functional criteria have been
developed from an urban perspective and little regard is made from a perspective of rural
existence. Golden Gate Estates is a rural community with rural perspectives, rural needs, and
rural character, and finds conflict when held to urban standards that don't relate with rural living.
Recognition of a need for a distinct rural standard is the beginning of addressing some of the
issues in the Estates and bring focus to the unique sustainable community it is.
Master Mobility Plan - Limited but Parallel Growth Management?
The Master Mobility Plan is being introduced into the EAR. In reading the brief overview of its
outline beginning on page xiii, it appears that many of the goals and strategies are functional
components of the Growth Management Plan and should be contained as measurable
achievements within various goals, objectives and policies. The MMP proposes to Prepare
Infrastructure Master Plan, Land Use Master Plan, Mobility Master Plan, Wildlife Crossings and
Habitat Preservation Master Plan, Public Workshops for a Draft Vision Plan Map/ Evaluate
effects of land use scenario on transportation plan - all items of planning that are currently under
the cover of CoIIier County Growth Management Plan. A concern is the Master Mobility Plan
becomes a parallel but separate Growth Management Plan for focused and limited scope of work
within the Growth Management Plan. I am concerned that the Master Mobility Plan wiII morph
into a document of overwhelming and ineffective volume of goals policies and objectives that
wiII require two review processes (EARIMMP) and a third process to reconcile the two. Is this a
result of the recognition ofthe disconnect between Transportation and Growth Management? A
concern also underlies the drive behind the Master Mobility effort is for the creation of new and
expended revenues as a replacement for now non-existent Impact Fee Revenues.
Page 6 of 10
22
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W James Flanagan III 08-26-10
From such tough lessons and negative community experiences, positive community efforts and
perspectives are being promoted in such efforts as the Estates BiII of Rights - an effort by the
Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association to introduce rural community ideals and standards
into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The Estates BiII of Rights is intended as a
prelude to instigate discussion of community concepts and ideas in advance of the GGAMP
Restudy so that such concepts and ideas can be discussed and vetted within the Restudy process.
Other Civic Associations and organizations are also promoting ideas. Visioning of a community
has many perspectives, and those perspectives become especially dear to the Community when
impacts, decisions and plans are made for the Community by entities outside of the Community.
Comments and Corrections from review of the draft
Collier County 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - EAR
EAC - Workshop Edition - received 08-16-10
Regarding Chapter I - Public Participation
The items within each category should be numbered. One line item bulleted on page 3 references
"Regarding Item #2.." and none of any items are numbered, only 'bulleted'.
As well, Under Eastern Lands (RLSAlRFMUD) - the last item - indicates "County Government
not providing awareness of development schedule of C.R.95 I." I believe this item refers to the
developments East of 951 - the proposed Town of Big Cypress and other future population
centers in the RLSA where impacts, plans, roads, interchanges etc., are not being shared with the
surrounding communities most impacted by these future populations. IE: Oil Well Road
Widening and "phased" widening with its middle-section a consideration for future development.
Some Public Comments that were made and recorded at the three EAR Public Participation
Meetings but not incorporated into Chapter I Public Comment are as follows, and the EAR
should be revised to include these comments and relative goal, objective and/or policy reference:
Urban Development Patterns
I. Urban Growth/Services Boundaries not established yet - Define and establish
2. "A reference was made that Road corridors serving the urban areas should be routed
around the rural areas so as to maintain community character" Staff noted this item as a
GGAMP Restudy item, yet the intent of the discussion/comment was to mitigate and
minimize roadway, traffic and population impacts ofRLSA urbanized developments on
surrounding rural communities and preserves. (IE previously proposed Big Cypress
Parkway and 1-75 Interchange to access Big Cypress)
3. "Plans for east of95l aren't flexible enough to accommodate change in growth rate" The
thought on this was East of 951 needs to have a comprehensive approach -
RLSAlRFMUD/Estates/lmmokalee/Rural Lands! Ag Lands/Preserves - and each cannot
ignore the effects of localized Growth Management planning on other communities. AIl
communities need to be engaged in a comprehensive planning and review process.
4. Need for a Community Center in Golden Gate Estates should reflect a Level-of-
ServicelPlanning Need/Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.4. Staff notes item as
'observational'
Page 7 of 10
23
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W James Flanagan III 08-26-10
Transportation
1. Access and availability to Public Transit needs improvement - Beach Access, Park &
Ride Lots, Employment Centers, Apartment Complexes, etc.
2. Bike lanes should be incorporated in resurfacing/road expansion projects
3. Decisions on Long Term Transportation Plans need to engage the public and those
affected before the decisions are made. Land Use Modeling excludes public participation
on where population and road assumptions are made. Engage the Public, Stake Holders,
Surrounding Communities in the formative function of community/transportation
planning. Incorporate Transportation (road planning) in the County's Comprehensive
Planning process - do not isolate and segregate transportation decisions and planning
with the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO).
4. Transportation needs to be made part of the Growth Management and Plan Review
Process.
5. Road Systems are being proposed that bi-sect rural Golden Gate Estates to serve the
urbanized RLSA and Eastern Lands. Other alternatives are necessary to mitigate the
transportation, traffic and population impact on the rural community and character of
Golden Gate Estates.
6. Paving of Limerock Roads needs to be completed. Work is secondary priority to Major
road expansion project, yet minimal cost overall.
Eastern Lands - (RLSA-RFMUD)
1. Lack of Participation in the RFMUD TDR program says the program doesn't work.
2. Application Process ofTDR Program is preferential to certain conveying agencies and
unfair.
3. County should develop a standard unified format for Land Management Plan acceptable
at all agencies participating in the TDR program
4. County should be studying impacts ofRLSA potential development and their effects on
Estates (i.e. Transportation, Traffic, quality ofIife, environmental impacts, flood impacts,
wetlands mitigation, water quality, water quantity) Address current and future costs to
the County/taxpayer associated with urban development in existing
rural/agricultural/conservation low density low use Eastern Lands)
5. County/RLSA needs to engage Estates and surrounding communities in planning process.
Issues need to be addressed comprehensively countywide and not exclusively within the
RLSA area/process. Serious Concerns have been raised about the effects of the projected
400,00 people in the RLSA east of DeSoto Blvd on Estates/Irnmokalee/Collier County.
6. LRTP not showing RLSA Transportation projections, however population projections
exist for the RLSA. RLSA FLUE Map missing from County website, yet referenced by
note on the County's FLUE Map currently posted on website.
Affordable Housing
1. County does not do enough to encourage or mandate Affordable Housing.
2. Workforce Housing should not be limitedltargeted to County Employees
3. In-law Guest Houses as affordable housing
4. Promote equitable distribution of affordable housing throughout Collier County. Address
saturation rates of affordable housing relative to economic condition, current and future.
Page 8 of 10
24
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by w: James Flanagan 11108-26-10
Water Resource Protection
I. In the need for County Watershed Plan needing to be holistic, holistic in terms of not just
water, but development, mitigation, environment, and especially coordination of
resources, planning and responsibilities between multiple agencies with diverging and
separate interests (DEP/ACOE/SFWMD/Big Cypress Basin/CoIIier Soil & Water
Conservation/CoIIier County Utilities/City of Naples UtilitieslDivision of Forestry/Fire
Districts/Emergency Management/FEMA)
Other General Comments made
1. Cat System doesn't serve/access Collier County Beaches
2. Library Hours insufficient
Chapters 2 & 3 - Drafts - General observations
Lack of time and subsequent issue ofIater draft (CCPC Workshop Draft) have prevented me from
substantive review of Chapters 2 & 3 of the EAR, however, I can offer a couple of comments in
my recent skimming of the EAC Draft and what I was able to scan as I printed out the latest
CCPC Workshop Draft.
1. Throughout the Elements a rephrasing and reformatting is suggested - what is the proposed
rephrasing and intent of reformatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies?
2. References to Standards of various reports inserted as reference without defining and stating
the desired reference can and wi11lead to unintended association of irrelevant details in the future,
potentiaIIy resulting in mis-association, irrelevancy, misinterpretation, and unintended
consequences.
3. Changes of References from one to another (updating) assumes that the reference standards
have been compared and analyzed for relevancy, consistency, intent and specifics. Can this be
confirmed? Does the new standard warrant reference and/or inclusion of specific provisions
applicable? Without defining and stating the desired reference can and wi11lead to unintended
association of irrelevant details in the future, potentiaIIy resulting in mis-association, irrelevancy,
misinterpretation, and unintended consequences. (reference for example Drainage Sub-element
Policy 6.2 and the suggested revision notes)
4. Regarding the County's recommendation for incorporation of a Randall Blvd Flyover and a
951/41 Flyover and the Everglades Interchange into Policy 6.5 of the Transportation element, this
means of policy revision seems to circumvent a process of review and comprehensive planning to
take specific transportation projects and commit and defme them through an editing of the
Growth Management Plan!EAR review.
Why is policy 6.5 to continue as a policy? The existing policy refers, an 1-75/Golden Gate
Parkway Interchange and a grade-separated overpass at Airport PuIIing Road and Golden Gate
Parkway. The County states, "the projects listed in this policy have been completed and renders
this policy obsolete".
Page 9 of 10
25
Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns
Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10
Why then is the County recommending to introduce three new projects not specific to the original
policy 6.5. I am concerned that Growth Management and Transportation planning are being
executed by editorial changes to the GMP without public process and vetting - and this on future
major road projects. What is the purpose of introducing these projects specifically into the GMP
Transportation Element? What is the intent of adding these items and what does it do to commit
and change any public review process or County Planning commitments - financiaIIy, or
otherwise.
Should not this existing policy 6.5 be removed as these projects now exist and are no longer a
part of the Growth Management Plan Transportation Element? And shouldn't any new policy
introducing new and specific projects be required to go through a GMP review process? This
approach raises concerns in both the process and the motives.
Concluding Remarks
The forgoing are concerns for discussion which I would like to incorporate into the EAR and the
EAR review process, and with the hopes to see forward that the issues and concerns be addressed,
considered and discussed, with the Public being an engaged and active participant in the decisions
of the future of our communities.
Respectfully,
W. James Flanagan III
280 nod Ave NE
Naples FL 34120
239-352-6352
781-254-8910
PagelOoflO
26
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 252-8848
'W\VW .colliergov.11 et
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
EV ALVA TION & APPRAISAL REPORT(E.A.R.)
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 2010
6:00 P.M.
The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Development &
Environmental Services Division, on Monday, January 2Sh, at 6:00 p.m., will hold a Public
Meeting at the North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall, Room A, located at 15000 Livingston
Road, Naples, FL, 34119, Collier County, Florida
Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes requires local governments to adopt an Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) once every seven years, with the purpose of assessing the progress in
implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. The EAR evaluates how successful a
local government has been in addressing major community land use planning issues through
implementation of its comprehensive plan, suggests revisions to better address the community's
vision, and addresses changes mandated by State requirements. From a statutory perspective, the
EAR evaluates the effectiveness, successes, and failures of the various Elements of the local
government comprehensive plan at a specific point in time. Ultimately, the recommendations
contained in the EAR become the basis for proposed amendments to the County's Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Collier County adopted its last EAR in 2004.
For more information, contact Mike Bosi, AICP, Community Planning Manager, at 252-6819,
or e-mail or Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, at 252-8498 or
email
-End-
27
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 252-8848
wvnv .('oHiergov .net
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (E.A.R.)
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,2010
6:00 P.M.
The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Development &
Environmental Services Division, on Tuesday, February 23rd, at 6:00 p.m., will hold a Public
Meeting at the UFIIFAS Extension Education & Training Center located at 14700 Immokalee
Road, Naples, FL 34120, Collier County, Florida.
Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes requires local governments to adopt an Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) once every seven years, with the purpose of assessing the progress in
implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. The EAR evaluates how successful a
local government has been in addressing major community land use planning issues through
implementation of its comprehensive plan, suggests revisions to better address the community's
vision, and addresses changes mandated by State requirements. From a statutory perspective, the
EAR evaluates the effectiveness, successes, and failures of the various Elements of the local
government comprehensive plan at a specific point in time. Ultimately, the recommendations
contained in the EAR become the basis for proposed amendments to the County's Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Collier County adopted its last EAR in 2004.
For more information, contact Mike Bosi, AICP, Community Planning Manager, at 252-6819,
or e-mail or Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, at 252-8498 or
email
-End-
28
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239) 252-8848
www.coHiergov.net
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (E.A.R.)
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MONDAY, MARCH 15,2010
6:00 P.M.
The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Development &
Environmental Services Division, on Monday, Afarch ISh, at 6:00 p.m., will hold a Public
Meeting at the Collier County Board of County Commissioners BCC Chambers, 3rd Floor
Administration Building (Bldg. F) 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34] 12, Collier County,
Florida.
Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes requires local governments to adopt an Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) once every seven years, with the purpose of assessing the progress in
implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. The EAR evaluates how successful a
local government has been in addressing major community land use phllming issues through
implementation of its comprehensive plan, suggests revisions to better address the community's
vision, and addresses changes mandated by State requirements. From a statutory perspective, the
EAR evaluates the effectiveness, successes, and failures of the various Elements of the local
government comprehensive plan at a specific point in time. Ultimately, the recommendations
contained in the EAR become the basis for proposed amendments to the County's Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Collier County adopted its last EAR in 2004.
For more information, contact Mike Bosi, AICP, Community Planning Manager, at 252-6819,
or e-mail or Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, at 252-8498 or
email
-End-
29
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Contact: (239) 252-8848
www.coIIiergov.net
www.twitter.comlCoIIi(~rPI 0
www.facehook.com/CoIlier(;ov
August 11,2010
FOR I1\fMEDIA TE REI..EASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
EV ALUA TION AND APPRAISAL REPORT WORKSHOP
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2010
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public workshop on
August 25,2010 at 8:30 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Chambers located on the third floor of
the W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F) Collier County Government Center, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail,
Naples, FL 34112.
In regard to the public meeting:
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be
limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman.
Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board
or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at
least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the
Board of County Commissioners Office.
For more information, call Marcia Kendall at (239) 252-2387 or Michael Bosi at (239) 252-6819.
-End-
30
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 East Tamiami Tra!1
Naples, FL 34112
Contact: (239) 252-8848
\Vvfw.coUierfov.nct
W'WW .twitter.{~omjComel'PI 0
w'Ww.facehook.cmn/CoHicrGov
August 11, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT WORKSHOP
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
August 25, 2010
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public workshop on
August 25, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Chambers located on the third floor of
the W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F) Collier County Government Center, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail,
Naples, FL 34112.
In regard to the public meeting:
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be
limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman.
Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board
or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiarni Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at
least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the
Board of County Commissioners Office.
For more information, call Marcia Kendall at (239) 252-2387 or Michael Bosi at (239) 252-6819.
-End-
31
Collier County Government
Communication & Customer Relations Department
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Contact: 239-252-8848
www.(.olliergov.net
www.t\....itter.com/CollierPI 0
www .fa(~ebook.('om/ComerGov
www.voutube.com/CoUierGov
October 27, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBl,lC MEETING
ENVIRONl\1ENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATION ON THE ADOPTION OF THE
2011 EV ALUA TION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2010
9:00 A.M
Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Advisory Council will hold a public meeting on November 3,
2010 at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners chambers, third floor, Collier County Government
Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples.
In regard to the public meeting:
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing, to the boardlcommittee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be
limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman.
Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board
or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356,
(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired
are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
For more information, call Michael Bosi at (239) 252-6819 or Marcia Kendall at (239) 252-2387.
-End- 32
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Contact: (239) 252-8848
www.coUiergov.net
www.twitter.com/CollierPlO
www .faeebook.(xmllCollierGov
November 30, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION ON THE ADOPTION OF
THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 7, 2010
8:30 A.M.
(Continuation as necessary, December 8,2010)
Notice is hereby given that the Collier COUllty Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on
December 7, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners chambers, third floor, Collier
County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples.
In regard to the public meeting:
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be
Limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman.
Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board
or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356,
(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired
are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
For more information, call Marcia Kendall at (239) 252-2387 or Michael Bosi at (239) 252-6819.
-End-
33
PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO
CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Cotrl8l' County Planning Commis-
sion will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7,2010 In the
Board of County CommissionerS chamber, third floor, Collier County
Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples. The meeting will
commence at 8:30 AM.
The purpose 01 the hearing is to consider recommendation to the
Board of County CommisSioners to transmit to the Rorida Depart-
ment of Community Affairs the adoption of the 2011 Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR.) to the Growth Management Plan. The
Resolution title is as follows:
RESOWllON NO. 11-_
A RESOlU11ON ADOPTING 1liE SEVEN YEAR EVAW-
ATlON AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) FOR 1liE COL-
UER COUN1Y GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR
TRANSMmAl TO 1liE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS (DCA) FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW ACCORD-
ING TO 1liE PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA OUTUNED
IN SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA SlATIJTES EVAWA-
TJON AND APPRAISAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PlAN.
t
i
~c........
--
~
....
o
...............
- -==--=-=-
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of
the proposed amendment are available for inspection at the Land
Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na-
ples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 AM. and 5:00 P.M., Mon-
day through Friday. Arty questions pertaining to these documents
should be directed to the Land DewIopment Services Department,
(239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development
Services Department, prior to liIesday, December 7, 2010, will be
read and considered at the public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier
CoLrlty Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered
at such meeting or rearing, he will need a record of that proceeding,
and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda-
tion in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no
cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact
the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at
3335 Tamiami Trail East. Suite 101. Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)
252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted fistening
devices for tre hearing impaired are available in the Board of County
Commissioners Office.
Collier County Planning Commission
Mark P. Strain, Chainnan
No. 231188463
November 21 2010
34
.l:"U.BLl~ .NU.L.l\.A:~.
rUDL1.v.l'lVJ.LvL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO
CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby gIVen that the CoIUer County Board of County
Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Monday, .January 31,
2011ln the Board of County Commissioners chamber. third floor, Col-
lier County Governmer1l: Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to con-
sider adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting wi. commence
at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to for-
ward to the FIorlda Departmer1l: of Community Affairs the adoption
of the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR.) to the Growth
Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 11-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA R8.AllNG TO THE 2011 EVALUIffiON
AND APPRAISAL REPORT ON 1HE COWER COUNTY GROW1H
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING -mE EAR AND APPROVING THE
lRANSMITl7\L TO 1HE DEPARlMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WI11-I SECllON 163.3191,
FLORIDA STATllfES.
AD interested parties are Invited to appear and be heard. Copies of
the proposed amendmer1l: are available for inspection at the Land
Development Services Department. 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na-
ples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Arrf questions pertaining to these documents should
be directed to the Land Development Services Department, (239-252-
2387). Wrttten comments filed with the Land Development Services
Department, prior to Monday, .January 31, 2011, will be read and
considered at the pubic hearing.
Co/I'" county
FlorIda
If a person decides to appealarrj decision made by the Collier County
Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter consid-
ered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceed-
ing, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim I&-
cord of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be basee!.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in
order 10 participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to
you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier
County Facllties Management Department, located at 3335 Tamlaml
Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least
two days prior to the meeting. Assisted Ustening devices for the hear-
Ing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Of-
fice.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COlUER COUNTY. FLORIDA
FRED W. COYlE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK. a.ERK
By: IslPatricia Morgan Deputy Clerk (SEAl)
No 678185075
Januarv 10 2011
35
Chapter Two
Countywide
Assessment
163.3191.2.a FloridIJ Statutes
2.1 ~ Population growth and changes in land area, including annexation, since the adoption
of the original plan or the most recent update amendments.
Since the 2004 EAR, the city of Naples has had six annexations comprising a land area of 441.42
acres (.69 square miles). Five out of the six annexations were of non~residentialland uses or
vacant residential, with the exception of the Moorings Park Mixed Use development that resulted
in a slight decrease in the unincorporated population and increase in the City's population. The
Moorings Park Mixed Use development is a pre-planned retirement community authorized for
594 residential units, ranging from single family detached units to individual patient rooms, the
estimated population for the development is no more than 800 persons. For the municipalities of
Marco Island and Everglades City, there were no annexations during the evaluation period.
Annexation Year Section - Township- Acreage Land Use
Range
Ruffina 2004 11 - 50 -25E 12.77 Mixed Use
Eagle View 2005 27 - 49 - 25E 6.17 Commercial
Moorings Park 2005 25 - 49 - 25E 82.946 Mixed Use
Collier Park of 2007 35-49-25E 112.82 Industrial
Commerce
Hole-in-the-Wall 2008 22 - 49 - 25E 204.73 Golf Course
GC
Bridges at 2009 27 - 49 -25E 21.99 Vacant Residential
Gordon River
TOTAL = 441.426
Annexations by the City of Naples since 2004
AreaIY ear 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Unicorporated
267.640 279.124 287,442 294,289 292,932 293,909 294,395 300,136 305,988
Incoprprated
38,546 38,664 39,216 39,569 39,922 39,123 39.204 39,650 40.099
Countywide
306,186 317,788 326,658 333,858 332.854 333,032 333,600 339,786 346,087
NOleS: L 2004 - 2009 are estimates and 2010-2012 are based upon BEBR projections, prepared by the Comprehensive Planning Department-
Population Growth & Annexation - 1
History of annexations by the City of Naples
...;f-
,,,..
I
.
I
I
I
\
\,
\
\
\
I
1
!
i
I
"'
...~
E::J....-. ,
~~
UClfij;'lUnu.,...,
l..:.-.3 ,,",~","!lo;>!!;"i!>..r,
E:J ,."...r,,'... '.;0' _tJ'l',' t~; ,.~
c:J A'~".""
L:':~],~~ IW"'M'~ T,.'!.;tj r.._, 1'-"
r-J ',"')f,tl!!I':..."'or ;:-r,,'n"f .-,'"~-H~~rll'ot',r~f'''.'l'''''
C-:J_'-'-":"':rt'l'~t-..-!:.--~rt'<'r
L~J<"":;""'A;""""t..- --.p,y': I'~.. '"
C':::J'".,,~ ""',"'-.,~~ ....~
C]U,':':1I~""
L=~J ,.....~;,,.M>-..I';'l.r-;'T r"
l.~ r~"..-:Y. f_.-~ ~-~ r........- f'7
[:::J r.W,"f~?--f'-~, ",,'n\: ";.. , ,. ......~r'1 ~1{1'TW""'"
CJ>'"''''''''lr~'''''
L-:-:..:3.---'"",u'.
I-,,'-.n--. ,-.,"~",,,:~~,,,:--~:":, r_'~Y
IZ:[;]lto^i.t''''''lf':'W''''! .!,-,."!<
L...J w;v"f:'",,;:-,u'l-
c::J"';"1il'~::-" '",,"7r
8 :::~:;~':,::~:.~ :,~;;~:~;1,~.:.-.1 tn.,;~
r--l r",~'~,J.-"t ,.",~~i': ~.t,~..:!,-::
[ ~J ':""An ".:'~l~ .;;}",....., ...~;:.'L
C::J s,""lI<'\ol,,$'I' I~}-If":"'";:>''''\.')
C.::J ,. ",
l~'''''~'-
c::::J ....r...,,^;...,.., t" 1'V-r.~..;'" '1-t I_V"
B :::'~:~:;I;:''''~~!'':::::
C-:-J nu. ) ""'\f-_'~,-;
l;:::~l~'~' , '--".-'
C~~J .....~.... -,.-.... ........
ri"~.~rt.":'l~.""'Jtf
.,
..1"t'
~
':
"
-.
\
i
i
\
i
i.
\
'I
\
\
i
\
l
i
,
I
1
I
\
i
j
\
t
I
,
1
\
i
i
1
~
i
\ ~.,
i ;1\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
l.'-:'~
~ta?j
A...~NE.1CATION HISTOKY
. -----" -,," . -~ --....., .'.
_...............,.. ..-._A._.....-_.._....
_ ~~...:;,::.,:. ~.",1.:.,;,..;;..-~-4:~-:-;:..=_
(Lt)" d :-":il.p:~, F:ond.a.
Population Growth & Annexation - 2
163.3191.2.b Florida Statutes
2.2 - The location of existing development in relation to tbe location of development as
anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan.
In order to assess the Character and Magnitude of Land Uses in Collier County a study of the
four major land uses (Developed, Undeveloped, ConservationlPreservation and Agricultural)
was conducted for each of the 12 Planning Communities for the 2004 Collier EAR and to
provide consistency in analysis the same structure of comparison was preformed for the 2011
EAR. The analysis (see Table 2.1) demonstrates that development in unincorporated Collier
County is not only concentrated within the Urban Planning Communities (North Naples,
Central Naples, Eai>1 Naples, South Naples Golden Gate, Marco. Urban Estates and
Immokalce), but has been experienced in the Rural Planning Communities (Royal Fakapalm,
Big Cypress, Rural Estates and Corkscrew), as well. These communities. while remaining
largely undeveloped, have experienced a larger percentage of growth in developed lands
compared against the Urban Planning Communities. The development within the rural
planning communities has placed a greater cost for the provision of services to the county's
infrastructure providers, as distance is a primary factor within the calculation of cost of
service. It should be noted that due to the larger percentage of dedicated
conservation/preservation designation that the majority of the acres contained within these
communities \vill remain undeveloped.
Planning Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total % of Land
Community Land*(Iess Ag) Land (less Ag) Preservation Land Acres Developed
North
Naples 13,500 4,381 501 1,123 19,505 69.21%
I Central
Naples 5,743 702 61 156 6,662 86.21%
East Naples 3,853 807 19 1,186 5,865 65.69%
South
Naples 7,543 2,530 989 1,517 12,579 i 59.97%
Golden Gate 6,863 1,254 46 137 8,300 82.69%
Marco 1,486 4,741 12,472 1,510 20,209 7.35%
Urban
Estates 14,376 3,474 288 2,904 21,042 68.32%
Immokalee 5,041 789 1,137 10,788 17,755 28.39%
Rural
Estates 29,634 28,950 114 16,426 75,124 39.45%
Corkscrew 12,603 i 13,464 20,672 . 134,427 181,166 6.96%
Royal
Fakapalm 10,104 36,441 , 230,698 75,715 j 352,958 2.86%
1
Existing v. Anticipated Development
Big Cypress 21,218 i 210 563,658 I 11,220 596,306 3.56%
Total i 97,743 830,655 I 257,109 1,317,471 10.02%
131,964 i
(Source: 2009 Property Appraiser Records & Collier County GIS
data)
. Includes developed Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Use land, Govemment, Golf Courses and R-O-W, Utility, Outdoor Rae. land etc.
Planning Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total % of Land
Community Land* (less Ag) Land (less Ag) Preservation Land Acres Developed
North
Naples 13,109 3,547 477 2,372 19,505 67.21%
Central
Naples 5,333 851 67 411 6,662 80.05%
East Naples 3,660 874 i 16 1,315 5,865 62.40%
South
Naples 6,281 2,206 1,100 2,992 12,579 49.93%
Golden Gate 5,923 2,028 46 303 8,300 71.36%
Marco 898 4,512 12,425 2,374 20,209 4.44%
Urban i
,
Estates 12,291 4,467 i 232 4,052 21,042 58.41%
Immokalee 4,776 1,036 1,326 10,617 17,755 26.90%
Rural I
Estates 21,764 36,998 I 125 16,237 75,124 28.97%
Corkscrew 7,959 12,166 19,522 141,519 181,166 4.39% .
Royal
Fakapalm 8,191 41,280 226,621 76,866 352,958 2.32%
Big Cypress 19,912 92 563,507 12,795 596,306 3.34%
Total 110,097 110,057 ! 825,464 271,853 1,317,471 8.36%
(Source: 2003 Property Appraiser Records & Collier County GIS
data)
. Includes developed Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Use land. Government, Golf Courses and R-O-W, Utility, Outdoor Rae. land etc.
The comparison tables shows that the County has experienced a 19.9 percent increase in
developed land over the past six years (131,964-110,097/110,097), with a majority of that
expansion contained in the 2004-2006 time period. For the period of comparison the BEBR
population estimates for the unincorporated area indicate an estimate in 2003 of 260,948 and
an estimate in 2009 of 293,909 a 12.6 percent increase {(293,909-260,948)1260,948}. The
increase in developed land was not supported by a corresponding rate of population increase
for the period of analysis. Clearly a negative consequence associated with the housing
bubble of the past decade. Chart 2.1 on the following page illustrates the extent of developed,
undeveloped and undevelopable land \vithin the County's land inventory.
2
Existing v. Anticipated Development
Chart 2.1
The Extent of Developed, Vacant & Developable land,
Vacant & Undevelopable Land within Unincorporated Collier 2009
830,655 Acres.
I
ACRFS
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
o
131,964 Acres
Developed land
Vacant & Developable
Land
Vacant & Undevelopable
Land
In order to assess developed land uses in Collier County a comparison of Residential,
Commercial, Industrial and Institutional uses was conducted for each of the County's 12
Planning Communities, comparing the table generated for the 2004 EAR against the 2011
EAR. This analysis is provided for in Table 2.3 and 2.4, and Chart 2.2 and 2.3.
Planning
Community
North Naples 6,796 1,518 395 432 9,141
Central Naples 2,79 495 406 68 3,766
East Naples 2,25 443 56 83 2,833
South Naples 3,246 369 I 9 164 3,788
Golden Gate 5,084 186 91 152 5,431
Marco 538 24 9 86 657
Urban Estates 9,018 360 9 219 9,606
Immokalee 1,838 364 147 185 2,534
Rural Estates 23,165 81 692 91 24,029
Corkscrew 1,765 i 219 52 1,069 3,105
Royal Fakapalm 3,706 ! 1,781 297 161 5,945
Big Cypress 556 ! 72 0 41 669
3
Existing v. Anticipated Development
I Total
60,760 I
5,912 I
2,0811
2,751 I 71,504 I
(Source: 2009 Property Appraiser Records & Collier County GIS data)
* Total excludes Government. Golf Course and R-Q-W. Utility. Outdoor Rae. land
etc.
Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total
Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres*
North Naples 6,338 1,148 390 495 8,371
Central Naples 2,397 468 429 84 3,378
East Naples 2,190 433 53 121 2,797
South Naples 2,883 431 7 135 3,456
Golden Gate 4,908 175 8 152 5,243
Marco 376 21 9 86 492
Urban Estates 7,875 190 33 165 8,263 I
Immokalee 1,628 251 133 150 2,162
Rural Estates 16,843 32 558 5 17,438 I
Corkscrew 1,414 572 52 886 2,924
Royal Fakapalm 3,582 879 310 86 4,857
Big Cypress 635 49 0 34 718
Total 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399 60,099
(Source: 2003 Property Appraiser's Records & Collier County GIS data)
* Total excludes Government. Golf Course and R-O-W, Utility, Outdoor Rec. land
ete.
Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional
2003 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399
2009 60,760 5,912 2,081 2,751
Change in Acres 9,691 1,263 99 352
Percent Change 18.98% 27.17% 4.99% 14.67%
As noted within the analysis for the time period, based upon BEBR estimates, the
unincorporated population for the County increased by 12.6 percent, where both the
residential and commercial categories increased at a accelerated pace, the institution category
was close to alignment with the population increase and the percent increase of industrial
land use lagged significantly the population rate of increase. The outpacing of the
residential and commercial development compared to the expansion of the population has a
4
Existing v. Anticipated Development
direct correlation to the surplus of both land use commodities experienced by the County
over the past two years.
Chart 2.2 2003 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COLUER
Institutional
Industrial 3.99%
3.30%
Commercial ~
7.74%
Chart 2.3 2009 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COlUER
I d t. I Institutional
n us na
2.91% 3.85%
Commercial ~
8.27%
The following charts and maps depict the twelve Planning Communities within the County and
the land use breakdowns for each of those Planning Communities
5
Existing v. Anticipated Development
(J)
u.J
.5 OIl
!: en.!
C111O~CII=S
i~t>>S...(tJ
u. w ti.::! ~w
"; - OIl 0 u Iii
~~~ E~-e
a:a:U.5CD:;)
. . . . ~ ,
....COO>O...N
...---..,..
!
~i
~~
hi '€
toR
0Q;:
Z"
&:~
~~
a<
~
t-
III
It.!raJ
ii."'...,!!CI.
CIIZ C) Cl.Z'"
Z-c:<<l
.c:!!GlZ.c:O
t:~:e-'S~
OGlO:O~
ZUC)wcn...
iiJ
:t
z
::)
:2
:2
o
u
(9
z
z
z
<(
....J
0..
>-
t-
Z
::)
o
U
0:::
u.J
....J
....J
o
U
Of T>l\E$\CO
GULf
6
Existing v. Anticipated Development
0
V> ~ '" OJ V> 0 OJ '" VI Vl Of>
E OJ OJ OJ
V> III .!!: III u +-' III
OJ ro OJ +-' +-' '- ro a. a. a.
'- '- '" ro '" ro (!) '" a. ro ro
C- o. U +-' ~ +-' ~ '"
>- ro Of> VI 0 Of> C Z Z Z Z
U ~ ~ l.U E L.l.I aJ .s::.
'" ~ t: U .s::. +-' ~ +-'
tll) U. 0 ~ E ro (5 +-' '" '-
a5 ::J ro +-' 0
ro u ::l .D (!) 0 L.l.I C Z
>- 0:: ::s Vl OJ
0 U
0::
..,
I
Existing v. Anticipated Development
'" ,
!
'" ~
0 OJ NjW
0 0. ....
0 >- '<t r-- lJ)
1J"l- u '"
N bll
i:O
o
o
o
o
N
V)
"'C
C
ra
.....
"'C
OJ
c..
o
-
OJ
>
OJ
C
OJ
V)
:J
"'C
C
ra
.....
M
o
o
N
a
0
0
N'
~ 0;
e 0.
0 '"
Z Z
0
0 2 V) V) V) V)
~ V) 1lI V) 1lI QJ 1lI
V) E 2 2 ~ ill Q. Q.
V) ~ 2 ro Q. Q.
~ '" ro '" ro ro \9 ro ro ro
a. u +-' -'" +-> 2: ro z Z
0- m V) V) 0 V) c: Z Z
>- -'" UJ UJ OJ .I::
-"" E -5 +->
u '" u C -0 V) g +->
bll w.. ... ~ E ro <5 :::l ro 0
0
ii5 Iii u ;::! ..0 \9 0 UJ c: z
:s V'l QJ
>- a:: u
0
or:
o
o
o
00'
""""'
8
Existing v. Anticipated Development
o
o
o
<.sS
""""'
Iii
>-
o
c::
o
o
a
oq-
rl
o
o
O.
N
""""'
o
o
o
o'
rl
c
'"
i'
::J
o
o
o
roO
o
o
o
.0-
o
o
o
oq'
I/)
Q)
'i:
o
0'1
Q)
-
ro
()
Q)
I/)
~
"0 II)
;..!
...I Q"
>,<'0
~:c:
c::
~~
E 0
8:c:
()
0'1
c::
c::
c::
~
0..
CD
(;)
(;)
N
~
"-
t::
:::J
e
e
o
(.)
tn
t:
"E
t::
oS!
Cl..
CD CO LO N N m LO ~
I/) m ..... m M CD M 0
Q) I'- LO M "<t ..... LO "<t
'- N-
U CD ..... ..... .....
<( .....
"0
Q) ..!.
Q. 0
c::
0 '"
<I>
Q) 0 .
> vi n E
Q) <I> -0 2"
II) c::
C c ~ ro
0 '" 'iii
E- ::> n 0)
N CD LO CO 0 0 ~ E Q. C :S
..... ~
.. ..... CD CO ..... CD 0 <I> 0> c c:
x ro 0
"0 "0 ..... ..... N m CO '" $ .Q VI
c:: ~ ro iil C
Q) ~ M
2 u C: IJ.)
Q. c <1l '" E
0 I/) ~ :; :n VI <1l -0
Q) .>< ::> c 15 '"
Q) '" a, 0) 0 c
'- i: (j 0.
> u '" c n E
<I> 'ijj .s
Q) e:( '" 0) .0 IJ.) a;
"0 c: c ~ -0 0>
0 'S: 0 '" -0
c:: (j '0; c 0 iil
~ '" u ::; c
'" ~ a; ~ a>
.0 <i OJ
.! -0 0> E <ll .0
c ::r: c -0 0
'" t5 0; ::>
-0 ~ U c
CO "<t 0 0 LO C") m LO ~ -0 >
..... Q) Q) <i 0 c OJ
0 CO CO LO 0 ..... N C") 0 ~ c (; 0> CJ .- > 0)
0 C '" e
m CD "<t CD LO "<t ..... LO N N 0 uf ro '" .c
::; if) n u VI ~
m ..... ..... ..... ..... N ::; Q. u M
.b n E B VI ~ N
~ C 0 n
~ E; C\l ... C U ~
I/) ~ :;; 0 ~ C\l
ro Q) 2 C if) (J) C -0 <i
"5 ro IJ.)
- '- <1l ::; ~ 0 Q. ID
0 g u
U '" if) (i) ~ 0 ui
l- e:( a, > qj m 0;
<1l '0 Q) E ro C: > :s
-'" '" Q)
if) <1l ~ uf 0; if) -0 0.
-0 -0 C C if)
C '" oI.l U <ll 0 ::> 0
~ '~ '" C LL U .c
'0 E 0; E; '" Q) C <Ii
0 > <ll <ll U ro "0
'" u .C 7il -0 c: -0 0
<ll U5
.::!! U) ?i ro ::J <ll .c
D :;; U 0. <.)
0. C ~ .!:: ui 0 (/)
E ~ '" -0 a; (/)
<ll C C
0 -0 ~ > <I>
(j U (/) ::J .2 <I> -0
<1l ::J
I/) U (j) -0 <3 ro -0 -0 U
'" (J) >.
~ <ll 0 :J .S i': C -0 .S
"0 ,~ - .... .... Q) 0 0. 0; U U <ll :;; ::J
Q) a:s c:: c:: Ri c > .!:: '" 0 7il i..:
c:: I/) ro Q) Q) I/) Q) a; <1l <ll c <ll
ro ~ c:: c '- '- > n -0 Q. 0 .b '" .c
~ +:: Ri 0 E E ::l ::l c:: <1l c: Q) 0 0 (J) :s 0
...I c:: .2 ~ ~ -0 ::J 0. 0; ro
Q) Q) "i:: ; c:: ro c:: 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 > c > '0 C
E .... ~ I.. I.. ~ () Q) 0; (J) Q) 'C <1l
"0 ~ D E '" E
I/) - Q) Q) .~ '" 2 > c Q. <1l
E .. ~ U " C E
::l +:: > > ... - "5 :; -0 ::J <1l ~
I/) IJ) <ll I.. (5 .f!! Q; u
"0 I/) 0 r:: 0 e .S:? u <5 Q)
Q) 0 .r: 0'1 'C u > ::J 0. >
0::: () c:: c:: C) 0 C) <5 e:( C) :!E a, 0> if) tJ) 0 u ~ 0
(J <: <: ~ ~ CJ c: 5.0
9
Existing v. Anticipated Development
-;)
a
...
f;: C <fl
:I: ~<~~-~ " J!?
I- 0 ~
g;~~.~.Q 0
0::: Z ~
.$::2 (j}:3 ~ N a.. V)
0 ::::) 8' fA C ::l:.;;:: u~
8!8]E (;
Z ~ 0 <Ii
Z ~ ~: "I t.C> to co oil 0; :s ] o-~
I.OL'I""'" fJ:i co .,... ,~ e
t>:~ ~ N '" ~ ~ ZUJ
- 0 <,~ 'C " I ~~
0 0 ls c: jj ~ Ilr
Z " (I) t) lr >-<
C) .. Cl I I II UJ"-
<( &:<: j IDw
Z ~ (I) .2 ~ 0~
..J .. ..J 11 11 ~
Z .. ~ *2
0 e Q. ! .~ ~ 0..0
" " "
III ~ " :5 " 0..-
W Z Q. ::> ::> ~~
"- :E ;;0 If:!
e.. :3 <( 0 (f)W
0 ~ an.
e.. 0
..J ..
W "-
en 0
> w ~ 0
W ..J '"
0 0
e.. 0
z <( '"
0;
::::) Z l.:
"
0
e
-
&
>- i
l- e)
-
Z
:::::>
~
~
~
0
U
C>
Z
Z
Z
<(
...J
a..
(/)
w
...J
a..
<(
z
:c
I-
0:::
0
Z
Z
0
Z
<(
...J
0
W
a..
0
...J
W
>
W
0
z
:::::>
u..
0
Z
0
I-
<(
U
0
...J
Gel NOl.SONI.^Il')"
,;
"
o
<{
UJ
co
~ . l--
"-~~
in
c::
UJ
o
z
~
o
c::
r:1
JI
~~ .."
t' i!!l'
4.
t#
# #
.
II
tlt;.1.\CO
GU\..f of
~z
#'
N lCil. IVliV!VIi"v'i
~
10
Existing v. Anticipated Development
en
CI)
'i:
o
en
CI)
...
CO
o
~ b
:J 'r:
-g-!~
~ ~ e
~~ 0
'c - 0
== ~ OJ
~ 1: ,5
o CD c::
oOi
g' Q:
c:
c:
co
ii:
en
o
o
N
I""- L() (0 co (0 L() N ~
en O'J O'J 0 (0 (") 0 L()
f I""- 'V 'V 'V~ (")
(,) N .....
<(
"
CI) \5
C. c
0 rh
Gi \I)
0 ~
> <Ii ..., .e
CI) \I) -0 i
'" c
C c: 0 ""
9 0- rh ';;;
Q. 5 ..., III
N N I""- L() 0 0 (0 ~ E 0- c: :5
.!!!
en L() ("') N ..... N I""- III 0, c C
)( "" 0
" L() ..... Q) .2
" c ... rh
CI) .!! ~ .e as c
C. ::> ..., 2: <ll
C :!l:: III III E
0 en 0 ::> III rh OJ .,j
CI) +l .>1 ::> c > OJ
Gi III C;, C> 0 e c
.... ~ 0
> (,) "" C "0 C. E
. 'Qi .t;
CI) <( III C> .0 \I) Qj
" c: c C "0 0:;
0 .;;; 0 ~ OJ "0
c: u .is c 0 as
:J .... u :; C c
~ <ll
III IE .c <3 III <ll
.i "0 ~ 0:; E <ll .c
c c -0 <5
III U ~ ::> c
O'J I""- ("') (") 0 (0 L() CO ~ "0 -0 e: 0 C3
..... <ll III 0 .6 \I)
'V N (") CO (0 N L() 0 N ~ c .... 0:; (!) > en
0 0 c m e
("i) L() 'V N ..... 'V_ 'V N 0 '" ~ III .c
:; '" "0 0 rh ;;;
(") ..... :; a.
~ "0 E .e rh ~ N
c 0 -g
n; .!!! "" 0 0 ~
en .a ~ ~ .!! III
- C Ul "0 U
CO ! tI>
... "'5 '" :; .r: as c III 0:;
<) 0 .2 a.
0 (,) '~ '" '" '" Ci5 as 0 '"
t- <( > Q) lu 2: Qj n;
"" '0 E 1ii >
... tI> tI> ""
III .!!! '" ~ '" -0 a.
-0 tI> C C rh
C rh "" "0 tI> 0 ::l 0
.!!! 'C c: 0 .c
a. l!! .!!! u.. "0
'0 E <ll '" f5 c <Ii
8 .~ <ll tI> III (5
rh ;;; "0 C
\I) ::> Ui -0 0
.22 rh ~ ~ III .c
0. "0 C3 .,; a. 0
c .6 0 '"
E .!! ! '" ..., Qj '"
<ll C
8 "0 c .!!! > tl)
-t:i U) ::> .2 tl) "0
III ""0 ::>
(II -t:i Q) 1:> C3 as -0 C3
0- III >0-
== \I) 0 ::> .6 2: ~ -0 .E
" .... ... CI) 0 Q. ~ C3 ii III ::>
CI) - .! CO c: c: ~ 0 .E fIl 0 ;;; ~
c: II) CO CI) CI) ~ CI) Qj III tl) C
CO ;:; (,) - c: "'2 > "0 "0 Co 0 >0- f/) .c
:J CO .9 E E == == c: \I) c \I) 0 C) Qj ;S 0
..J c: .... .2 ~ .! "0 ::> Co Qj as
CI) CI) 'i: ... c: 1ii c 0 g ~ ~ 0 > c > 00- E
E ... ::::I ~ III \I) 'C 0 III
== .... ~ .... 0 -0
" (II ... CI) (1)~ (,) CI) ,2 ,2 c E Co '" E
E Q> (,) III C \I) c
'in == ;:; > > ... .~ - "'5 "'5 ""0 ::> III '"
'" '0 (II ~ ""0 0 Qj
CI) 0 " (II 0 c o.! ~ .>1 .>1 <) 0 ::> Co >
0 :i ~ .... U) U)
0::: 0 ..E c: C) C)~ C) C> .- 0 C3 5 0
u <( <( ::;;; ~ C) c a. C)
11
Existing v. Anticipated Development
>- $'
l- s: c;;-
z ~ ~~ (3
U .?:
:::::> i::'-lii 1ii c:
0:_ g.-!o-" :0
t-Z "rig 0
~ -" -ps t,,)
Z:J ~ ~ ~ ~ !
~ W::::e 8!8~1! ~
O::::e :g.NNt-1.O "0
:2 !jU')(>")N-r ~ U
ZQ .o;(ttl 06
0 -0 E -E
~~ 0
() u
-4:Z ..
II:
C> ...1- ...
Z :
z CZ 'i!
W-4: a.
D...J Q.
<(
Z Qa. ~
Z ...lei) W ..
Ww 1(1) Co
<( >...1 !:J .!!.!! iii e
Wa. c~1ii~ ll..
-l io ...
C-4: CIl~"C:;:: g
0... Zz :z "0 1;)::J N
:J ':5 '0 E ::I; ..
CIl0'OUJ e
(f) a: 0 s:: s:: :0
UJ 0
!!!.
-l
0...
<(
Z
-l
<(
a::
I-
z
UJ
()
Z
0
Z w
<( ,
-l
0
UJ
0...
0
-l
UJ
>
UJ
0
z
:::::>
l1..
0
Z
0
-
l-
e:(
U
0
-l
III
..9!
~
N
! ;; j Q~
-~ 1!l <'-'
0 f d~
'tJ j E "5
E !:l Zw
c 11 0 .. ~ ~:l;
lP '-' I%: f-
OJ - ! .., .., "0 ::La::
8- ! ! >-<
lP .., We._
..J ~ ! .S! .S! j row
'" .. ~ 00
Co i; 1; .. ~ .. i ..-
-g "0 ." ZOO
III ~ .ij" c c c -z
:E :l; ::> ::> ::> ::> 0.0
0.-
~~
a::
UJW
13~
~
0
o
r;
12
Existing v. Anticipated Development
UI
CI)
'a:::
o
Ol
oS
CU
o
CI)
UI
:J
"C CI) ::::s
; Q) e
...J-e
.a-i-o
'c <: 0
::s - t))
E CI) c:::
E CU '-
o LIJ c:::
o c:::
t\'I
~ a:
C
C
cu
a:
en
o
o
N
~
.-
c:::
UI
CI)
'""
(.)
<(
"C
CI)
C.
o
0:;
>
CI)
C
"C
0>
C.
o
0:;
>
CI)
"C
C
:J
s
o
I-
"C 0>
C UI
j:J
UI
e
(.)
<(
UI
CI)
'""
(.)
<(
......C"')<OC"')
LO~LO<X)
N~
N
<X)O'>Nv
~OO......t-
~ LO...... ......
.!
c:
.S!
~
Gl
III
c:
o
(,)
1/1
1/1
..9!
0'> N <X) t-
LOLO<OLO
t-LO N
N
fti
;:;
C
CI)
"C
'Ci)
CI)
a=
.!
~ CU
CI)'a:::
E-
E~
0'0
OC
fti
C
o
;:;
::s
.....
;:;
en
C
OC"')C"')
(,0 LO
v......
('oOv
<X)
......
......
0'>
......
~(,OC"')t-
O<X)(,OLO
v...... v......
!
~~
......
~
'-'i
-0 ~
Ql -0
g..a
~ .~
Ql ..
"0 1:;)
c: Q)
::J a.
m ~
.3 ~
:s "0
u (,)
"g, .~
<( :2
,
o
e
'"
Q)
o '
~J2
~ .i
UJ 'w
1:;) Q)
c: :5
.! e
c; 0
.2 rn
ra c
~ Ql
gJ ~ -ci
e > Q)
o 0 c;
(,) a'E
'g .1'; Q;
~'gQ)
o _ -0
C tU C
(I) ~ ~
EQ).o
E -g 0
Qloe
> c: Q)
(5 'c 10 0>
e
~fl~~
..!2 ~ [I! ~
6;ai~
<ll - -0 <>
1058.'5
(ij ~ -ffi> vi
~:VQl]i
lU U) "0 "0...
"C C c:: II)
Q.l 0 :::J 0
LL. 0 -0 .s:::.
., fl c: u>
-8c:<<lg
-5w'g"fi
.5 0 g- 0
c~"ii~
.g..!!!i;-g
'i"Tj\:J{3
;:: ~ ?i .5
"O~~~i..:
~c:>- ~
08]~o
~ c .~ ~ 1:
~~aID~
:::::J c: Q) U) C
u~~e.(u
~(5.~a8
......
-
C
CI)
E
C
'""
CI)
>
o
C)
UI
..... ::s
C -0>0
CI) ~ l!! CI)
CE ::s::sC
ic .:!:::O~..J
~ '""CI) ::! 0 0> ;;eo
CD >~.:::~ u ~
l! 010,0!! n
~C)'5<(C):!: ~
13
Existing v. Anticipated Development
>-
I-
Z
:::>
~
~
~
o
()
(!)
z
z
z
<(
...J
a..
C1)
w
-l
a..
<(
z
I-
C1)
<(
w
z
"C
C
Gl
ell
Gl
..J
a.
CIS
::i
UJ
~
~
N
ii)
a
Ii GO (l) N ....':, t
i~ ~ ~ ... ~ Ii 8
10
1<
liD
0..
o
...J
W
>
.W
il~
Ii;:)
I-~
UJ-
:i~
z:E
-:E
00
zO
~o
z
0-
wZ
o..Z
oj
....10..
w
>UJ
ww
O..J
zo..
::;)<C
z
~~~-~
0",.. o:~ ,m.2
.<<:. .b-
~,;g ~~
u~ 8 ~ 2
=~~~~
lJ~~ ~
<t.
..
~
118
,.011
It -!
II i
I a:
~
..
f!
Q.
Q.
<
~
..
Q.
e
Co
'"
'"
'"
'"
.....
a.lil
~~
'l-
Gz
Zw
<:It
>->-
Ie::
l--<(
Ula.
row
..0
Goo
~z
~~
:<;:2
<nw
155
-;;;
;:
~
l~:i_
.g E ii ..
~ ~ ~ ~
:!8:~
tIIII
j~ilii
~I=>::>:J~
'Iw
i(/') 'ii 'ii 'ii I
P"U'ii51
i10 c: .... "i: ;:; 1
:ZGl~-:::l1
1< ~ E ~ ;: I
:)~-~-~~--~[j I
!2
LO
o
o
o
z
<(
-l
o
w
(L
o
-l
W
>
W
o
z
:::>
u..
o
z
o
I-
<(
()
o
-l
14
Existing v. Anticipated Development
I/)
Q)
'i:
o
en
Q)
.....
CO
U
Q)
I/)
:J
"C CI)
; .s: E
..J Q. E
~~ 0
51S ~
E ::::s t:
E 0 "-
o CI) t:
U t:
g> ~
c:
c:
CO
a..
en
o
o
N
(,OO)o)"<:t
I/) "<:t (,0 (,0
e "I (") ..--
o (")
<C
"C
Q)
Co
o
-;
>
Q)
C
~
"-
t:
::::s
"C
Q)
Co
o
-;
>
Q)
"C
c:
:J
Cii I/)
..... Q)
o s..
I-~
"C Q)
c: I/)
co:J
..J
r- (,0
.. lO lO
-g "I ..-
!l!.....
c:
1/),2
Q)iii
s.. i=
o CI>
<C ~
o
u
'"
..
.!
(")lOOlO
0"1..--(")
lOlO lO
"<:t
- CO CO
CO.- c:
..... ~ CO 0
c: Q)'i::;:::
Q) E
"C t;;.a
I/)E::l:;:::
Q) o"C I/)
c:::uC:.E;
..- ..--
r-
(")
I'- 0 r-
(,0(")(,0
..-"<:tl'-
"I
OOlO
lO "<:t
(") r-
..--
0) COr-ON9">
CO lO"-(")"--f:;::
0) lO lO "<:t lO ..~
..-N..-N
.....
-1::
Q)
E
c:
s..
Q)
>
o
C)
I/)
..... ::l
c: ctI Q) 0
Q) s.. en Q)
cE ::l:ic:
~ c: ~ 0 ctIt<i
~ i B U Q)
CI> > "C".- _ 0,,-
.. CI> s.. - 1/)"-
i~~~~i~
~
r-:
"0
c:
Ul
;))
en .g .E
<I> U
c 2 ~ 2
o a.. (/) 'in
:a :; "0 (J)
W; ~ ~o
~ ~ ,9 I./J
15S roc:
3 ~ ~ E
:1'" 'f}a>"O
0::1 C><t>
Cn~ 8E.~
: 'Qj U g- -
g'.o j!!.-$
.;;; 0 ~ -0 a;
'0) C o~"O
~ :5 ~ ~ ~
u..o~ EQ}.Q
c: ~ C "'0
In 6 Q5:l
~~~ c3~~
~55a>0c:
:;:::; N 0 ro
::i {/} "0 0
.?:- -g ~ -gj
~ ~ E
.2 C ~
~ ~ "5
.~ ~ ~
~ '0 ~_ro
U '"
c: <Jl <>1l
~ -h ~
'0 E OJ
gs 8-~
-[ -g ~
E ~ ~
8 u ~
-0 ~-o
<I> <::> ::l
a.. 0 U
o >.f;
~ ~ -0
<I> c: '"
U ::l a.
o
~ ~ ~
-s ~ ~
(.) (.) (.)
~g, .~ (J)
-< -< ~
~
M
vi en
0. '-'
E .2
~ 0
(/} ~ c
.c to .2
~ co co
E 15 ~
(I) ~ ~
-g <l> 8
jS! ~ Q)
<l> '" (.)
en "D c:
ro :J U5
?:. 13 .;
m .~ "U
~ g ~
~ II
-g ~ 0
g-c~
-a; <.) co
~ ~ .?:
12 E 0..
:; E <l)
u Q) 5
(/J ~ 7J
~ (') c:
15
Existing A "
.. v. ntlclpated Development
"0
c
(l)
> '"
~ ~
<II '"
2? ~
~ ~
"0 d
~ai
-~ ~
<I> ""
U 0-
S ~
-g W
rn (5
"0 0
<I> .t::
g. ~
~ ~
<l> U
"0 ::l
>>13
"0 .~
~ ~
<II .t::
;S (5
c g
* ~
o Q;
~ ij
0.(')
>-
I-
Z
:J
~
~
~
0
()
(!)
z
z
z
<(
-1
0..
(j)
W
-1
0..
<(
Z
:r:
I-
:J
0
(j)
z
0
z
<(
-1
0
W
0..
0
-1
W
>
W
0
Z
:J
u..
0
0
z c::
0
0 (3
<(
c::
I-
<(
()
0
-1
:x:>-
1-1-
::)-
o~
CI)::E
z::E
-0
Co
z"
~z
CZ
wz
0.<(
O..J
..Jo.
wCl)
>w
w..J
Co.
z<(
::)z
~
ii'l
~'''''.,'''' l~
il~l fa ..'~."';:::.I; ~
10: t'\!.,....I"); 8
r" .II:~
,10 1 ~
I'~ "...~
> i g
uJ !' 0::
l~llll
i~
:~ itiI ....~!! I
1:16 'C';e."ir.2!i ~
1'% ~'i:~.; Ii ~
',"< -'. ":S = I '"
i....J :iR.VllJJUi I ~
'i 0:'0 " t;; . s:; .,
L..- .':.~.._:..' " ~
:s
o
!e
o
r.f)
..9;!
~
N
n. ",
f:2:5
<0
dt::
2'2
"'w
r::!'
...
~~
wn.
<Ow
bO
Z'"
-2
&:.Q
~!;(
mffi
5?J
"2 -;;
U
.52 ..
'tJ i E
C ii
(I) ;: <.)
tl) '" 1
(I) ~
...
..J .5l "
~ 1
Q. $ ~
('II ~ :5 ~
:iE '"
j
~ ~
'" ;;
a is
&. &
'" l1
"1l>8- g.
g!
~ J:
:5 ~
U')
o
I
i>' Lvi
",1
$/
~"./
,,'ty
/t
l
/
/
" /_- h,-
_"t ,.:~ I'
-('"
~~-.\,
) ,
/\ I.... -, .e J /:;:,
\-..,,~' r -^... ~ """.... (,."..
(,.:;j .' -, J, m. ,(,,~"'-i
r '"' ~v'::l:1"
"""Z. - ;, .' ('2r
J)r--
/l ~ '~,I ~ <7 / !
0'>~- ~!f!/~~' Y-~d;
,?-~/)'~"~'~~'j ~~~
-' t"
'"
",.,
z
16
Existing v. Anticipated Development
o
Q)
.;::
o
0)
S
C'G
o
Q)
o
:J
"g.!
C'G CU
..J(!)
b
.- s:::
~~
E-
g~
o
0)
C
C
C
C'G
ii:
en
o
o
N
o
~
(.)
<(
"0
Q)
C.
o
-;
>
Q)
C
~
'-
s:::
::s
e
e
o
o
tJ)
.5
s:::
s:::
.!
Q..
01
"'0
"0 c
Q) .!!
C. c
.2 0 0
Q) ~ i
> (.) ~
-8<(!
C 8
:J =
..!!
.B
o
I-
"0 Q)
C 0
C'G:J
..J
.qoCDO"lN
<:.0<:.0 1.0
O~...- ...-
1.0
.qol"-OCD
MO"l M
<:.0 ...-
I"- M 0') <:.0
...- <:.0 <:.0
qM ...-
1.0
o
Q)
...
()
<(
-
'i C'G ~
:p ~ C'G 0
C Q)';:::p
Q) E - :::s
"0._ 0 _
E:::s:p
~0"O0
0:0.5.5
<:.0 M 0')
N 1.00
.qoCD
0')01"-
o <:.0
...- ...-
CD
.qo
NI"-MLOg
I"-MLOO"l
M...-.qol"-
cO
~
~
~-
.....
In
4l
C ~
.2 e-
ii ::s
E a.
Il) Ol
X CIl
Il) ~
m .e
.3 ~
~ gj
0, ~
CIl 'Qj
g> -SO>
'S; '0
'8 ~
~ .Q (j
-g ~ li
tll rj
-g ~ ~
~ ~ g
'5 (/) 13
.2:- -g 5
~ J!!
.a c ~
a ~ -s
'g, ~ ~
: 0 ~_m
u '"
<:: '" 06
!e .~ en
'0 E Qj
~ 8 ^E:
.~ ~ ~
E ~ ~
8 -g ~
i:i c. '"0
III 0 ::s
a. li 0
o ::>.5;
~ ~-i:i
III C <ll
U ::s a.
e e j
.2 .3 Q)
"3 "3 "0
(.) (.) (.)
~ ~~
,
'0
c
'"
III
o
u .E
g ~
rJ) '0
-0 4l
j=
C
C 0
.2 CI)
C6 C
~ ~ -d
C ::> III
8 0 c
u a.'E
<ll .5 li>
~ ~ ~
C .!! ai
4l ~ Q)
E",.o
~ -g -0
~ 13 c
U 0 ,f; %!
li8cmcn
uitnm..c~
o.UOq)(""')
E..!2{l~N
~ (; fij m ~
~-Eg~~
~ en ~ ..2 u;
III _ 2 ~ ]i1
Ee4141-
f1i~~-g'g.
-0 4l 0 ::l 0
1ijLL(.}"OJ:
-"'ficui
$(J)c:t'Oo
~~U5ij3~
~ .~ {ie' ! ;
c ::>-
"g .2 ..!!! Q) -g
0",-0"0<:;
5; > ~ ~ .5;
-ci W ~ .3 i,.;
tV ~ 0 U'J l])
o.o>-w.c.
~~~;So
a; C1 :> a ~
-g E .~ ~ E
::1 c: (J) lJ) C
uCii-g8.a;
~~g~~
17
Existing v. AnticI.'P' atedDeve1
.topment
-
C
Q)
E
C
...
Q)
>
o
C)
o
_ :::s
C ",Q)O
Q) ... l!! Q)
-:-_~E :::S:::sc
C -;; 00 C'G 1...J[<i
~Gi () Q)
:= > i';:: :: ~ P;::
C Oz: 0)0.-1!oJ
~C)!<C):i....
>-
I-
Z
:::l
:E
:E
:E
o
o
C>
z
z
z
<(
--I
0-
W
I-
<(
C>
z
w
a
--I
o
C>
z
(/)
j!
:E
N
~ffi
_0
<u
1Ii 3! ]i 0~
c: ~ C 1i Zw
.9 ~~
i E '" ~
"
15 ... ::0 Ill::
'" ~ 1-<
oS U ll:: Wo..
i .. i <IlW
J ! .0
~ <.::>'"
0 ez
'" ~
iG ! 0.0
" ~~
" "
c: c: "
=> => :;) a:
Ww
~ <315
0
Ul
~ffi .~_.. 15
~,.... 0 <0 !! ~
Z c
~]j i :;; I') (1) I') ::s
W >- ~ c: co.... != 0
0-- .11 U
C !::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ,a: ..
..J Z III ! IU II ~
0 ::> ~ 8 1< "5
C) :E .". "'" '" .0 U
III '"' ~ '"' ..
t; '" iw
~ :E < .- ,1:5 ~
Q 0 ~ : 1m I 0
0 <>
z :> , ::.
<C C) iw ! ~
..J ~ :0 ..
c z :z ~
!=> CL
W Z CL
i <(
0- ~ ~
0 ..
..J 0- w CL
W t/) j iii iii e
w n.
> I=> ~ iii c:
l- E ..2 ...
W 0 <>
<C lD ~ "C ~ l'3
C z U)
C) !<( -0 a;
Z u; E ;) ..
!-' -0 lIJ <>
:) lD 0 ;
a: U c: E 0
!!1.
o
a
z
<(
--I
i1&~W
~
-~
a
w
0-
o
--I
W
>
W
a
z
:::l
lJ..
o
Z
o
I-
<(
o
o
--I
o
>
-'
ID
Z
W
W
a::
o
S O^ 18 N'd8Ol
.-
o
>
-'
ID
(/)
~
o
~z
/8
Existing v. Anticipated Development
II)
Q)
';'::
o
C)
Q)
-
ns
(J
Q)
II)
:;:)
"t:l
c:
ns
..J 0
~~
c: C'Q
~~
E
E
o
(J
C)
c:
c:
c:
~
D..
0')
o
o
N
co v 0') (0 0 0 N ~
II) ('t) N CO V
Q) 1.0 (0
s- f...-
u
<C
"t:l
Q) 0
Co c
0 00
a>
Q) 0 ..!.
> vi v oS
Q) '" " :i
CI) c
C c 0 '"
0 0- 00 'w
'a :; v a>
0 ~ 0- C E
1.0 CO 0 ('t) 0 1.0 E 5.'1
III 1.0 0') .... CO <ll rn c c
x m 0
" CO 1.0 !'- r;} <ll ~ 0 00
"t:l c: ~ .p "" c
Q) .!!! ('t) .... ::u
(: a>
Co c: .2 n a> E
'"
0 II) .2 :; <f) 00 a> TI
~ ':ii .9 :J c > '"
Qi en Ol 0 0 c
1: c u a. 'E
> u '" "0
Gl '0 ;:!! S a;
Q) <C III 0> .D
"t:l c: c 0 ~ -0 Q)
0 '> 0) u
c: <.> 'a; c 0 ro
c
:;:) III U '5 C ~ 0)
III E: .0 <5 0) a>
.!' ~ 15 E 0) .l:l
~ t:: "0 15
0; <S Qi :J C
('t) N 0') 0') N !'- 0 0 !'- ~. "0 U E: <.i > ~
a> <ll 0 a>
Cj) ('t) !'- !'- CO .... N ~ c 0 ID 0 > ffi
0 c: '" e
1.0 0'). V .... 1.0 v. "3 N 0 ai m tIl .!:
. ~ '" -0 a. u u '"
('t) N .... .... -0 :5 '" ~ <'?
.2- c 0 E ..Q u N
.... m S' '" 0 c Cl ~
II) 3 ~ :;: S' '"
C '" a> -0 U
ns Q) :; '" "5 ro c <ll Q;
- s- ..c .9 0.
0 U u u ~ (i5 0
.'" ro ai ro ai
I- <C '" )0 <l) '" C: Oi m
'" "0 E m >
00 x CD <l) 0) .-
S' ai lJ) 1:> a.
-0 a> '"
'" '" e<l -0 -0 C C 0
a> 0 :J
S' .~ '" t:: U. U .!:
.!l! -0
"0 E Q; '" 0) c ai
0 > 2 '" U tIl 0
00 u 'C <f) -0 '" U 0
a> :J Ui
lJ) '" :;:- '" 0) .!:
.~ U ~ ~ <Ii a. u
c 2 0 lJ)
E .!l! lJ) -0 Oi '"
(I) c c:
0 -g S' > (l)
u -u '" .Q a> '0
<l) :J
II) a> -0 U ro " u U
" a. :J .!: C: a> >-
~ '" 0 c v .!:
"t:l m m - - Q) 0 a. Oi U .. '" ~ :J
Q) c: c: ns 0 > .!: u '" 0 (i) a;
c: II) ns Q) Q) II) Q) -Qj <to a> c
c: '- a. 0 >- <f) .!:
ns +- u c s- c: > '0 U 0 (jj 0
:;:) '- ns 0 E E ;j ~ a> c '" ID 0 ;S
..J c: ~ ::: ns u :J 0. ro
Q)';':: +- c: c: 0 ~ m ro 0 )0 c > "0 C
Q) '" ~ ~ a> '" (l)
"t:l E - ;j '- 1: '- (J Qi 3 3 u E .~ '" ~
II) - Q) Q) _u c a>
E ~ (ll - u '" :J C (l) lJ)
II) +- > III > :>> -i:: .!!! :; :; u a; '0 0 a;
Q) 0 "t:l II) 0 c: 0 .r: C) 0 ~ u u u U > ::l a. >
0 -c 'C lJ) rJ}
" (J c: c: C> u C> 0 <C C> ::i Ol Ol ~ ~ 0 u 5 0
<{ <{ 0 c: a. 0
~
"-
e:::
:::s
E
E
o
(.)
0')
e:
"-
e:
e:::
~
Q..
19
Existing v. Anticipated Development
o
::
:
U
>-
.....
z
::::>
::;;E
::;;E
::;;E
o
(,)
c:>
z
z
z
<(
---1
0..
o
(,)
IY:
<(
::;;E
z
o
z
<(
---1
o
W
0..
o
---1
W
>
UJ
o
z
::::>
u..
o
z
o
.....
<(
(,)
o
---1
o
U
0::)-
0(....
~-
ZZ
-:J
O~
z~
0(0
.Ju
Of.:)
Wz
0._
oZ
.JZ
Wo(
>.J
Wo.
o
z
:J
~j
iY/
.:%7
.,'f~f
,,"<'/'
,(
/
,(
,(
/
/'
/'
f
./
I
l
/1
/
j
"0
; u
i ""
111
;: Q)
ijill
, <(
\ >.
i ~
Q.
o
Q.
0>
o
<:>
N
0;
e
:J
o
~
.
tII
13
~
t:
:J
o
U
".)(
~ i..{
~.
..~,~ l ( ...~}.~t
/,_?',l/fI.:~"Ij-
____m", \'. ~'i. e; B J;~;J i,
: ... ~ I ~.'g; ~~~~:
jl I R \ ~~ N ~ ~ :;~~:~'~i
-g 8 ] 1ii ! t:; 0: '..3'!. ~\ ~t-
J ! 1 t i r .- g ~~~~~
~ ~ ~ f ~; \!") &:sn~<!.I"'Y
J :5 :5 .1, "'.'1. i.' ~?~i~~.r.";7'~',
~~~,O~
.:!Jtr I~, ''''I
.~ .J-y., l,~~
~..~ . f~( ,f~:t"7'~~ .w)
"--.~;:;~~i~::~
'\ ....f.\ -----, i.. ,-7
. '-\ ':'-\
. !~~ '7
~ 1 AJ:~~:;~~. <:'-
'--.. \ ~"11 ..~ ~
.J~',,"'~, i"
. .",. ~...;i";..: t,--
:' (~/:~':;~) { .:, '-,
'\_.J~~' ) ~,,^ ~
~. ,"';w' .
. '. L"""h-,. '. >-~:>:.~
. i' ~~-<:"
Y4tr !<
.., ~ {..-, / .&
.. ~["' ~ (c.-r
~'" ,.l,;".., /'
\ 1~~>' ,""',( f. /) ....J
\., J-\ ,),"'if "i/". ;;7 A.'
~ ';/c--~ >j)~ c:i(. / ,;;1
,i ii ri,'? ~) c'~Jr:t., ii r
,~""" '~.. ,,--.'" .01\
~ ':;j ......... "? / , ,....r~0\~'\..
':Y'-;::, ~, ~, t~'!~p\ ',,--
'1:: \ ;' ;;4;/';J'/<"} ,,_ .-:.,
~;..~/ 'rr:f~d ..~..
{~~-~> ->. ..'" ~ f~~, ,.;-t., ~
>~~;.t ='~~
;}:\ ~J{
"l:l
C
Q)
C)
Q)
..J
0.
l'G
:2:
(v
"j.\CO
:f tlE:
GU\..f 0
-4z
20
Existing v. Anticipated Development
f/)
(I)
'C
o
0)
(I)
....
CO
o
~ ~
::J 'i:
~ U) :::s
; .! e
..JJ!!e
~I~ 0
'c ..... 0
:::I t: 0)
E C1S r::
E .Q '-
~ r::
o ....., r::
o C1S
g' it
.-
C
C
co
a::
Q)
Q
Q
N
f/)
(I)
a-
U
<C
~
(I)
0..
o
'a;
>
(I)
C
~
(I)
0..
o
'a;
>
(I)
~
C
::J
s
o
I-
~ (I)
C f/)
CO::J
..J
f/)
2:!
u
<C
f/)
2:!
u
<C
0000'>0>
...-co "..
q("') N
0>
o
"'("')
]00
.!!N
c::
o
~
Gl
'"
C
o
U
<II
III
.!!
...-00
("')
...-
....
- C
CO (I)
g E
:w C
:::I ...
- (I)
:w >
f/) 0
CC)
I'-LOOO~
VN(",)~
00 ...- ...- .-
"':NN~
~
I'- 0 ("') I..-~
LO ...-
o LO
...: j..:i
00 I'-VLO"'-~
00 OONLO
N LOO>.....CO
NNN~
f/)
.... :::I
C 'is (I) 0
(I) ... t!! (I)
C E :::1:::1 C
o ~ocou
~ E :::Io'a;~
f> (I)> 'O:'.~ _ u. .
III f>"'-f/)~
5 0.1: ~ o'-IIJ
.ec>:2.<(c>::E1I-
,
(5
e:
fJ)
'"
o '
. "O~
~ -g .2i
~ ~ .;;;
-. -0 Q>
C. j ~
g c: g
'- .2 (f)
..E ii E
-0 ~ '"
Sl :ll~-o
:l e:>1ll
OJ DOe:
c: () c..
'Qj -g .5 'g
~ ~ -0 ;'l5
e: o"*~
Eo ~!35
~Gi ~.g.o
- ti Q;:J:
~ ~ cJ~ ~
5oGiOe:
N .g ~
~ '5
c: 0
.5! .
1:~
~ "S
(Q ui
:> Q>
b -'"
III .5!
.!!l o/l
a. fJ)
15 E V
~ 8'f:
.~ ~ ~~
E 3 :r
o
u
C
.9
15.
E
III
><
Q>
~
.a
"S
u
'~
ca
'"
co
'5
'8
~
'0
e:
1Il
"0
III
~
:i
:?:-
n;
,3
"S
u
'C
OJ
<ll
'"
"0
co
.5!
-0 '"
III III
ii Q,-g
~ .!2 0
o ~.s
~ .g ii
<U co 4l
"0 ::> a.
~ ~ ~
.3 .a ~
13 "S "0
'C .g ~
~ ~~
via;
a. u
E .!2
~ (;
'" <I.l
.:=m
E U5
1Il
E n;
ui G>
"0 "0
C III
.5! u.
'" ~
0"0
'" ::l
1; 0
rn .S
.~ c:
::l .9
(,) 7ii
.!: ~
ii '"
'" rn
a. c
o 0
QiU
:> 1:
<I.l '"
-g E
::::J E
g ~
~ c3
21
Existing v. Anticipated Development
(5
e:
III
> '"
~ !2
rn .-
fJ) '" (")
"C~N
j cu ,.-
e:OOtS
.2 8. Q
a;~u;
~ > ~
~ ~ '2-
co co 0
8 ;:, .r=.
'" -g '"
g to "0
i:i5 -g i'
fIi 15' ~
~ (i; ~
,!g ~ -g
"0"00
~ ~ .!:
~ ~ ~
>- '" .1:
4> ~ 15
iii -
> '0 ~
.~ ~ E
Q) to') E
"t:l 0 '"
::s e- >
13 ::J 0
co a. 0
OOT""O'>O>
vO> T""
OOV N
.....
.....
-
co
:w
C
(I)
~
'en
(I)
a::
CO
'u-
a-CO
(I)'C
E-
E~
O~
OC
>-
I-
Z
::::>
:2
:2
:2
o
o
C>
z
z
z
<-
...J
D...
(j)
W
I-
<-
I-
(j)
W
Z
<-
lD
c:::
::::>
z
;>,?
... .
:;:f
~,
.~ \
U\
lo-(
~~1i 1l
0' u - c
'" ~.111 g
g~!~"
GI.__ ~ ~:!II!
o~8~~
:~t;OO
b "'.-
<'"
1
u
(1)0.....00
,W ~ ~
10:: .
10 N
I~
ill.
10
i..oJ
I~
I!,W
10
II~
rn
i.3
~
c:
:::I
o
u
:i
"0
u
...
..
'E
o
<>
..
0::
~
o
5:2
_0
<\2
'I-
<:!lz
Zw
~~
:::0::
1-<
WI>.
ClW
(:j~
~Z
&Q
<I-
::;;<
'"
"'w
13~
Z~
<(-
tnZ
0::::J
:J~
Z~
-0
CO
Zo
<(Z
..J-
CZ
wZ
a..<(
0-'
..Ja..
WCIJ
>W
wI-
C~
ZCIJ
::::;)W
Ul
J!!
~
N
~
..
c
a
Q.
<(
II ~
'IW 8-
ii~~'~~~ ~
'lz~mc;;Z! fa
Y:(lijE:::l;:; ;,;
j :...1 CIl' 0 -g :g , 0
~ Ice: 0 _I! g
~
o
::;
CD
W
~
C)
z
w
o
..J
o
C)
o
~z
o
z
<-
...J
o
W
D...
o
...J
UJ
>
UJ
o
z
::::>
u.
o
z
o
I-
<
o
o
...J
~
./
Na~NOiS8NI^11
)-
o
u
Ui
o
a:
w
w
..J
~
o
:2
;!;
GAla };I31l108
a~ N01S8NIAIl
o
a::
w
w
..J
~
o
:2
:2
.~ a};l8r,ul'indI};jod~iv ,.
22
Existing v. Anticipated Development
f/)
Q)
.t:
o
CD
.s
to
(J
~ b
:J ....
"0 5
c: Cb e
j.! e
~~ 0
"c 00
::l e OJ
EE e.5
- r::
o r::
(J ca
~ it
c:
c:
to
a:
0')
o
o
N
00 v r-... 1.0 I.{) 0 0 ~
f/) ('f) co v 00 v 0
e 00 C") ~ ~ C") ~ ~
() ~ 0
<( ~ .-
"0 ,
Q) '0
Q. c
.2 '"
<l> ,
(I) 0 ~
> .; 1;l .E
(I) 4.l -0 !i
c III C
0 0 (\l
,2 e- III 'm
0. ::l -0 ll.J
0. C :;
0 ~ N C") C") 0 C") ~- E .!!!
('II 0 0'> r-... V ll.J t:ft c c
-8 x (\l 0
"0 C") ~ N V 4.l ~ ,2 !2
c: ~ .E ;;
(I) .!! l"<- e
-0 2: ll>
C. c .2 ll.J ll> E
0 f/) 0 ~ III '" ~ -c
.. ::l C t1l
Cii Q) III rn C> 0 e c
l- e: c <.) 'E
> () III 'Qi -0 0-
Il> G> ,E Q;
(I) <( ell OJ .t:J
"0 c: c: '0 ~ -0 Qi
0 ':;: t1l -0
c: tJ 'Qi C 0 ;;
<.) 'S C c
:J III !!.' 1! Q)
II) .t:J <3 <ll ll>
.!! 1;l a; E Oll D
e ~ E 1;l '0
III 0 Q) ::J C
1.0 0'> 00 r-... r-... CO 0 C") ~ -0 "0 ~ <.i > (J
00 ll> ll> 0 ,S t1l
1.0 CO C") 1.0 C") 0 00 0 ~ c "- Iii Cl > en
0 0 c (\l !2
~ V N V ~ V r-... ~ N 0 <Ii <<i '" .c
- ~ 'S III "0 <) III ~
0 :; 0. U <'l
N ~ ('II .?:- "0 E .Q III ~ N
~ e c 0 -c <.)
.!!! ~ tC 5 c t\$ ~
f/) ~ .!!!
.2 E III -0 t.i
S e "5 $ c ll>
tC 'S .c '" ,2 0. Qi
<.) <.)
0 () '~ tC '" '" CD ;; 0 .;
.... <( > <ii 2: jjj ]j
tC - Q) E <<i >
0 "" ll> ll>
III .!!! Q; '0.
-0 Oll <Ii III -0 '"
-0 C C
c .!!! ~ "0 <l> 0 ::l 0
.!!! 0. c t.l .c
III .!!! LL 1;l
- E :u '" 8 c '"
0
<Il 8 .~ l1> ll> C '" (5
fii -0 "0 0
Q) ::J ii5
<If <If ~ tC Oll .c
'C "0 ?; (J .; C. t.l
0. C 0 ,S 0 <If
E .!!! <Il "0 jjj <Il
~ Oll c
8 -0 C .!!! > Oll
"0 <If ::l .S! Oll "0
t1l t1l (J a; "0 1;l ::l
f/) i::i c. -0 ,S <II >- (J
::l ll> 0 ::l 2: ~ -0 ,S
"0 :! iii - - Q) 0 c. jjj (J i::i Q) ::J
Q) c: c: to 0 > ,S III <If 0 Iii Iii
c: to Q) (I) f Q) jjj Q) c
to f/) () - c: C I- > "0 i::i 0. 0 .?:- III .c
:J ;; to 0 E E ::l ::l c: Q) c <l) 0 u Q) ;S a
..J c: I- 0 .:: .!!! -c ::l 0. jjj ;;
(I).t: +:i C:" c: 0 ~ 0 > C '0 c
(I) <<i ~ <l) >
E - ::l I- III I- ::l (J jjj Q) "- t1l
:2 (/) (I) c: () (I) .a .2 > "0 E 0. '" E
- (1)- C t1l
E ::l +:i > :: i'~ := () :i "5 <l) ::l C Q) '" E
f/) > ... f/) -0 Qi -0 0 <l)
(I) 0 "0 (/) o c o~ 0 ~ <.) .9 0 <.$ > ::l 0. >
i "- a .!l '" (J
0:: (J c: c: o! 02- <( 0 OJ ~ 0 ~8
<( <( :2 (.9 c
23
Existing v. Anticipated Development
>-
I-
Z
:::::>
::?E
::?E
::2
o
<..)
C)
z
z
Z
<C
....J
c..
W
W
....J
<C
~
o
::2
::2
w
W
...I
<
~
0>-
:it:
:iZ
-:;:)
z:i
-:i
Co
Zu
<
...Ie>
CZ
w-
a.Z
OZ
...1:5
we..
>
w
C
Z
:;:)
-i 15
~frH
~.:g~~,E
u~8il:! ..
lJ2.O..... N n "C
ti~~<:D~ ~
<(
Ul
2i
I~ ~ (; ~;j] f
Iw"".... Ni!(.)
(iCl: L t
i.i..~ ""5
'i (.)
1* i
I....I~ i
;IZ I
,i::::> ~
~
<II
Co
o
0:
0>
c:>
c:>
N
..
e
:>
o
!!!.
Ul
..!l
~ o.ffl
N Uo
~ Qj ;; ;O:u
.;::
'0 ~ OJ <.'>z
~ i '5 Zw
"0 .3 !l ~~
1ii E
C 0 . ~
ClI .E u 0: jE~
01 " " I " UJa..
~ j ! 8- 8- mw
0 i .2 0 ..0
;; . ;; ~~
0: ~ ~ ii ~
CI. i 0 " 8:2
III .ii!' 5 c:
:IE :a :;) :;) :;) 10 ~~
I ci '"
"'ill
5@;
0
8181.8.
Cl
1::
ill
W
~
o
::;
~
-4z
24
Existing v. Anticipated Development
z
o
Z
<C
....J
o
w
c..
o
....J
W
>
W
o
z
:::>
u.
o
z
o
I-
<C
<..)
o
....J
12
!j
i;i~
iz
:..J
!L~
IV III IV I
--_C:
'E~dS~i
-8~:;~!
iiE:J;;.
lPo'O'"
a:oC:c.
II)
(l,)
'r:
o
0)
(l,)
...
(IS
u
(l,)
II)
:::)
"0
c:
(IS
...J
>-
.=:
c:
:;:,-
E ~
E,e
0",-
()
0)
c:
c:
c:
nl
it
0')
o
o
N
CI)
~
l.O "... N "... <D l.O -.::t ~
II) <D CO 0'> 0'> -.::t 0'> "...
! "... <D (") r-- CO
() (") N "... ~
e:( N ..-
"0
(l,) ,
Q. g
0 '"
a> '"
0 .!.
> <Ii -0 S
(l,) Q) -0 $
'" t:
C c: 0 <\1
,9 1:- '" 'in
a. '" " '"
r-- l.O CO 0 0 en ~ E C- t: -E
..- .!!1
II} r-- <D ...... 0 CO CO '" ci c: C
'"0 (") (") ..- 0 x <0 0 0
"0 '" ~ ~
t: ~
(l,) .!!! CO -.::t ~ ~ S
Q. N D C 03
t: '" Q) c
.E II) ,g 'S '" '" Q; -ci
(l,) 1ii '-' ::::J t: > <ll
(l,) 'g, Ol 0 0 c
t.- > c u ?i E
> () .. <\1 -0
G> '<5 .E
(l,) e:( II} m .n Q) :v
"0 t: c c:: D ID
0 ';;; (5 ~ (l)
c: .., S c 0 ro D
:::) <II '5 ~ C
<II ~ a; ~ '"
.0 <5 0>
.!! u ~ 0 E Q) .0
C ;:: ~ '0
'" <5 Qj c
N <D (") en -.::t <D <D l.O (") ~ u '" e ..; >
'" '" 0 ,S Q)
-.::t -.::t 0 en ..- en N 0'> 0 ~ c 5 0 G > '"
0 c '" S?
l.O "... 0 "... ..- 0'> -.::t r-- 0'> ~ N 0 vi ~ to r:.
- .. t.ri '" v C- '-' '" ,.,
..- "... N <D ...... ~ );1 '5 E .2 '" Q) N
l.O 0 -0 t;
..- r-- ~ .i!? ro 5 c ~
II) ~ ~ .!!! <0
(IS (l,) .2 c '" <1' C "0 <5
... ::::J ro .3 .c ro <ll 0
.... 0 c.
0 () .~ u '" (j) ~ 0
ro <Ii <Ii
l- e:( 0, > <u Qj
ro 0 <ll E -a 2: > E
"" Q) Q) '0.
OJ) <ll .!!! vi 0; '" "0
-0 " C C '"
C '" 00 " <ll 0 ::::J 0
.!!! 'ti ~ c u.. U -0 r:.
0 E '" .!!! (/) '" c (/)
0 > Q) 0) '-' III <5
(/) {) .C <;; " t: -0 0
'" i:i5
,iQ "' ~ '" ::::J '" r:.
?i "0 ;;: ~ <Ii 0. U
C ~ 0 '"
E .!!1 '" v Qj '"
a> c: c
0 -0 .!!1 > a>
t} i:i '" ::::J .Q G> -0
'" "0 :J
II) i:i <D "0 <> ro v <>
C- ,S S!! >-
;:j '" 0 ::::J 2: "0 ,!:
"0 .~ ... ... (l,) 0 a. Qj <> i:i G> ~ ::::J
(l,) ctl c: c: (IS 0 > ,S U) 0 <;; ~
c: II) (IS (l,) (l,) fI) (l,) <i> <ll '" C
(IS () c: C t.- t.- > -0 D n. 0 >- '" .c
:::) +:: (IS 0 E E ;:j ;:j c: G> C '" 0 u Qj ~ '0
...J c: ... ~ :: .!!! u :J 0. a; ro
(l,) (l,) "r: +:: c: c: 0 ;;i - ~ 0 > c > '0 c
E ... ;:j t.- III t.- :;:, U ro Qj Q) Q) .~ Q)
"0 II) c: () (l,) 3 .2 > u E U) E
E ... (l,) <ll (l,) () Q) 3 c G> C
;:j +:: > > i.t: :!:: P ::; ::; -0 G> '"
II) '" .~ :v -0 0 :v
(l,) 0 "0 II) 0 c 0 .cO) 0 t} <.) <.) <3 ::::J a.
0 t 'c '" '" > >
0::: c: c: C) C) :2.e:( C) :E Jf 0 ~ :; 0
U .!:- t- ~ ~ G c. G
~
.....
r::::
=:3
e
S e
U18
0)
t:
'E
r::::
~
25
Existing v. Anticipated Development
>-
t- ..J>-
Z <(I::
rx:Z
::> ';:)::)
:ii: o.::=:
Z=:
:ii: -0
:ii: 00
ZC)
0 <(z
..J-
() OZ
wZ
(!) 0..:)
Z 00..
..J(/)
Z Ww
>t-
Z w<(
<( Ot-
Z(/)
....J ::)w
Cl..
(f)
W
t-
<(
t-
(f)
W
....J
<(
i:r
::>
i:r
z
0
z
<(
....J
0
W
Cl..
0
....J
W
>
W
0
z
::>
u..
0
Z
0
t-
<(
()
0
....J
UJ
Z
..J
.~
t-
z
-"'z
-~~-..;;~;",;,;.,.,.....;;;~
i
:!
i
!
I
,
i
\
!
i
I
iil
if ,... !lO .....ao~l ~
l!i!O'~~ Ii ~
:I~ ~
"t..J 5
fw 0
!> ..
!W tt:
11~ l
I~~ ~
I~ j:j 1- ~ i !
:..il~ ;1.~.:5 "...g I' g
q . "O<.I::'0,::>>.i ~
i< "iiiiE!:;'= ,
l-J ~1c3i~,~~j i
e
.
1
!
!
-I
!
~i
~l
i
8
w
:J
(/)
~
a. [3
>10
<((.,)
d~
zi5
~2
xi!:
1-<(
Wo.
"'w
(j~
~z
Il.o
~i=
:::;<
t., ffi
Bg;
"
'E ~ ~
~ ~ ~
8 & ~
II!
~ J .~
" s ~
~ ~ ~
II
OJ
c
.Q
"'0 t
c
Q)
Q) il ."
Q) ~
..J & OJ
0. ~ l5 ~
III ~ 'E' 5
::e :li
~i
on
':;:
26
Existing v. Anticipated Development
f/)
CI.)
'i:
o
01
CI.)
-
CO
o
CI.)
f/)
;:)
-a
c
co
..J
.a-
.- CI) (,)
5 ~ t2)
I: 0 ...
I: (,) .:::
o c::
o c::
ca
~ it
c
c
co
a:
en
o
o
N
~
'-
c::
::s
~ e
e e
to) 0
f/)
CI.)
a-
U
~
-a
CI.)
C-
o
Q;
>
CI.)
c
-a
CI.)
C-
o
Q;
>
(I)
"0
C
;:)
f/)
s CI.)
o t
I-~
"OCI.)
C 1.11
co;:)
..J
1.11
CI.)
a-
U
<(
1.0 0> N 0>
<.0..-1.0<.0
......N 0
..- ..-
l.O'l:tON
<II N..- 1.0
"g0>"- 0>
.! 0
c: ..-
o
;:;
ll:I
~
o
<II
c:
o
U
<II
<II
Jl
OMN..-
O>MLON
<.oM 0
N N
..-
iij
:;:;
C
CI.)
:E
1.11
CI.)
a:
.!!! iij
E CO g
(I)'i: :;:;
I: en .a
1:::1:;:;
o -a 1.11
OC.5
......MNt::
'l:t0>..-~
M M 1.0 ~'I
gN"-~
..- rr-
OOM~
CO ......
o 'l:t
'l:t ~ ......-
rr-
N
......
<.0
o
N
M......MLO:D
O>NO>CO:O
1.0 'l:t_ M 0> .....
LO'l:tNN""';
~ ~
~
~
.,;
Q)
c ~
.Q C-
o. :s
E C-
Ql 6
x t'll
Ql '-
~ J2
.2 i
"5 ell
<.> ::>
.~ g>
'" 'v
g> .0
:~ g
Q)
(J "5 C
~ .J:J d Q.)
"g ~ Qi g
to (.f 0:;
~ ~ ! 0 ~
~ ~ g : ~
S (/):E 0.. ()
.?:-"gi5EE
~~~~~
a~'5.c~m
'I:: m VJu;
~ ::. ~ <<IE'- -=
'" 0 -'" ..
"o(1)~qjtt;
~ .~ oi5 ~ ~
'0 E ~ 11! f/)
~8'E:~-8
.!!1 ~ ?i ~ ~
(s.c. _~
E .!! ~. ~ C
8-ogj"g,/2
-0 2i.., 13<;;
III 0 ::> .5: ~
:S~~-o31
~ -8" 2ig
~ 5 2i ~ u
~ ~.; ~ ~
~~~~~
,\:? ,\:? <.J (j ~
~ ~ (I) tn 0
<<~~o
-
C
CI.)
E
C
a-
CI.)
>
o
C)
1.11
_ ::1
C (1)0
CI.) ~ ~ CI.)
gE ::1::1;
~ E ~ <3 Q;
Q) ~ ~.- - u
! oj o,o.!
!C):9~c):iE
27
ETisting v. Anticl'P' ated De I
' ve opment
,
'0
c
'"
Q)
o .!.
~..s
c
t'O
ell
"
c
.!!!
c
,/2
1i1
~
Ql
'"
C
o
<.J
"
Ql
C
~
.l!!
'w
II)
:S
c
o
((j
C
Q)
E
~ -g
o c
0. 'E
,s Iii
"2 Q)
.;!::"
.!!! ai
~ Ql
Q) .0
"
::>
13
,=
c
'"
<.J
ell
"0
C
.!!!
c
o
~
~
Q)
((j
c
o
<.>
'0
c
Q)
> Cf)
~ ~
ell <'?
~ ~
'" ~
"0 ti
2iQi
o CJ)
~ :e
d) 'a.
"0 '"
C 0
::> .c
lS "g <Ii
t: m (;
U5 i ~
(I) g. iA
-g ''is en
.!!! a; -8
-c " ::>
Ql >- 13
c: "'0 .E
~ ::>
o 1i5 ID
.2;-0.c
~ ~ 15
.2: '0 ~
0. ~ E
Q) '" C
"0 0 G3
::> 0. >
g ~ c3
$'
~
::
>- 0
f-
-
Z
::>
:E
:E
:E
0
()
C)
z
z
z
<(
...J
0-
S
UJ
a:::
()
en
:::s:=
a:::
0
()
z
0
z
<(
...J
0
UJ
0-
0
...J
UJ
>
UJ
0
z
::>
LL
0
Z
0
f-
<(
()
0
...J
~
w
r:r:
o
(1)>-
::'::1-
r:r:_
Oz
0;::)
z:E
-::'Ii
CO
ZO
<C)
...JZ
C-
WZ
o..Z
OJ
mo.
>
W
C
Z
;::)
~z
~j'~ ~
i',j e~:...ll
--:2 ~ w ::3
~d!8~!
lO.m..,. 0 N
~. ~:: ~
~ ~
z
>-
~
v
~
"'-
: !eI)
'!W
:!~
::0
iiw
H~
!iul
I!i
i ;:J
in
E
It)''''oC'llI~
C'Il.- It) ::s
(J)_~ OJ. 0
o ~
~
'0
o
lllI
..
"Ii!
o
u
..
It:
"'Cl
C
1V
CSl
.3
a.
ca
:E
~
,2
::i
..
.5
1 I
'" i
i ~
::i ::l
~ )
Gel
~ ~ "
8 ~ 1:
1 11
i .li! i
! i ~
:5 ::') ::.
...
..
II
e
0-
a.
<(
i ~
il~ iii iii ~ g.
:;..... - 0 ti 0 Q:
!iQ C '-a:;:; en
'iz III ~ -:l g
'Ie( ~ E ;'J;:i N
'i....lIllO'DlIJ ;,;
d 0::0.5.5 ~
o
!!!.
~
28
Existing v. Anticipated Development
(f)
~
:Eo
...-
I,()
'"
Q.w
00
4:U
._;:::
~m
~~
roc
f-<
WQ.
row
..0
~~
Q.o
a.~
<(>-
::;;<
oc
UlW
a 0..
o
r
l""""
-,.
~
~
c::
, ; ~
tJ
..)
~
N
o
0
>- ; >
f- a ...11:::
<(z
z ~ >::)
:::> o~
~ o::~
zo
~ -0
~ CC)
Zz
0 <(-
..Jz
0 cz
0 w<(
o...J
Z 00.
..J~
Z w..J
><(
Z uJ wo.
<( z c<(
::; z~
...J i: ::)<(
Cl... z u..
::J
0
~ 0
...J ir
a
<( z
UJ
Cl... J:
<(
~
<(
LL
...J
<(
>-
0
a::
z
0
z
<(
...J
0
UJ
Cl...
0
...J
UJ
>
UJ
0
z
::>
LL
0
Z
0
f-
<(
0
0
...J
r;-'~~O) 0 I!
..~.cn g ,.... ~N ~
ia: ...: 10
<( I ~
b t <3
UJ I ~
I:~ ,I
UJ I i;
o I'~
!~
te(
I".,
11::
'..
:!:!_~II
cl::!~.!2ig
CD~_:;tO
~Eg:;:!~
CD Q "0 U)fli e
a: Q ..!:: ..!::~: g
~
(f)
~
2 0
" ,,-13
" ~ ~D
~ ." ~ <~
:0 "
;; E .. ~ gi
"0 12
~ IS li
c:: ~ 8 ~ o<;w
CII I>: >-~
" '" ." ."
tll .. .. .. & II>:
ell f r r >-0<;
:.J.Ja..
oJ .. ~ 1 LO row
0.. i ~ ~ {Ii ,,0
i! '" ." ~~
III ~ " " 5
:E :> :> '" ~g
I LO :!~
N tOw
5~
-4z
30
Existing v. Anticipated Development
en
CD
'i:
o
C)
$
ftI
U
~ ~
::J '-
-0 5
; = e
..J e e
~~8
5 0 OJ
~ ,~,5
o tn c::
u i
~ a:
c:
c:
ftI
a::
en
Q
Q
N
CONO~
fII Lt) I"- -:t
f Lt)
(,)
<(
-0
CD
0..
o
Gi
>
CD
C
-0
CD
0..
o
Gi
>
CD
-0
c:
::J
s
o
I-
-0 CD
c: fII
ftI::J
..J
~
fill"-
"C
c
.!!
c
fII~
f 10
(,) ~
<(!
o
l.l
fIl
fIl
J!
en
f
(,)
<(
I"-NOo)
NI"- co
co
Cii
;;
c:
CD
-0
'(;;
CD
a:
OOCO
N
- -
ftI ftI
.- c:
~ftI0
CD'i: ;;
E -;; .a
E::s;;
o -0 fII
u.5.5
-:to
l"-
N..
0)
coo
-:t
0)
~
co
Lt)
co~
(1')
co
Lt)
Lt)00Lt)
(1') N N
-:tN N
ci~
N~
~~
o
,,;...
~~
N- E
2
"3
(.)
15,
tll
Ol
C
':;
'iiJ
(.)
~
'"
<Il
'"
c: 0
,2 e-
o.. ::l
E 0.
<Il Ol
~ (\'j
~
$2
"0
<Il
'"
::l
0>
c:
'iii
.0
o
c:
:;
.c ..;
- a;
;f c5
] ~
c: 0
~ .g
~ "5
c: 0
~~
t'i s
<0 vi
> <Il
'0 ~
tU .!.
.~ 00
a ~ ~
~ 8-E;
'" ~ ~"
.~ c 0
E .!! .!.
o
(.)
-0
<Il
a.
o
fi)
>
<Il
"0
E
2
"3
(.)
.~
<(
"C
C
m
~ ~
~:;
2!:<
m
.a
"3
(.)
"C
0>
(\'j
U)
;:!
~
31
E'f:isting v. Anticipated Development
-
c:
CDc
E~
c: 10
a... ~
CD 4>
> III
o c:
C)!
en
_ ::s
c: -CDO
CD l! I!? CD
~ ~5iW
Q; (,) U Gi ~
> -:::-.- _ (,) L-
Qla...-fII-
o.c:C)o.-b
C) ! <( C) :IE ....
--0 </)
<Il <Il
a.-g
o U
~ ,5
Ql
"0 .",
c: Ql
::l C.
o
1!~
2 Ql
;S"
.2 0
~ '"
~~
,
o
c:
VI
<Il
o .!.
"C $2
;:!
;; .!!
U) 'iii
"C <Il
~ ~
c:
,9
iii
2:
<Il
'"
C
o
(.)
"0
<Il
c:
i:
o
c:
o
'"
'E
Ql
~ ~
> <Il
o c
a. "E
,!:,: OJ
~ a;
.;!:: "C
C t'O C
(1) ~ *
E <Il .0
C "0 0
<i~~~
'i(5"->0>
fii ~ ~
~ ~ M
-gt>~
~ ~ u
c: <Il _
,9 g-- OJ
m"'Q)ui
2: > !
<Il <Il .0.
~ ~ en
8 .; ~
Q] c:: <Ii
g tt'l (5
~ I ~
-g ~ ~
.!11 <Il "C
"C "0 ::l
<Il >. 13
~ -g .5
o Cii G1
2!:<VI.c
-*;So
> '0 ~
'8. ~ E
Ql '" c:
"'0 0 d>
:::! 0. >
1) :s 0
,S 0. c;l
uf(ii
0. (.)
E .9
~ 0
UJ <Il
..s::;- <<i
f! U5
'"
E e
vi II>
",-0
c: <Il
.!11~
<Il <Il
1ii -g
~ 13
tl) .f:
~ C
~ ,9
] ~
"0 II>
<Il '"
0. c:
o 0
ai0
> C
Q) Q)
-g E
::l c:
o OJ
'" >
~ (5
>-
I-
Z
::J
~
~
~
o
()
<.9
z
z
z
<(
-l
CL
U)
U)
W
0:::
a.
>-
()
<.9
co
z
o
z
<(
-l
o
w
CL
o
-l
W
>
W
o
Z
::J
lJ..
o
Z
o
I-
<(
()
o
-l
~
C)z
-::>
m:E
~:E
co
20
jC)
O~
W2
0..2
oj
irlo..
>(1)
W(I)
CW
ZO:::
::>0..
>-
o
~]j ~ - ~
oc ~.,m.Q
.UE~ii
~!8]!
",r:oo~
"
t3
<
BRO\/VARfJ COUNTY L,NE
(fj
~
:a; 0
o..[l
>10
<Q
~ ~~
.2 <w
"0 ~ >-~
C Icr
.E 1-<
ell Wo..
en mw
ell l.() 0;';
...J ~z
Co "-0
0..-
IV <l-
S ::;:<(
cr
t.q lilt"
<:;e..
N 0
0
Vi
1:5
1;-
c
'"
o
G
~
'0
o
05
..
"l:l
l;
i g
Ii I
I' ~
j.! - ~ III
1 ... (,,) III 0
o 1:.... - - '"
ZGl~~:m~
<(~E::I=' Qj
..J41o"l:lll) ..,
0::01:1: !5
o
~
!'(f) .... 0 0 to -')
115 ~ N j
,<(
10
IW
I~
!Iul
IGj
10
UZ
ii:::>
ill
LiJ :z:
2: _J
>-
>h Z
,~
~ ~
0 ...;
::...J
..""'-.
~
2:: 2::
('h\ Z
Z .~
"j
~ :2
D
D/,DE COUNTY UNE
'"
'"
~z
32
Existing v. Anticipated Development
2.3 - The Extent Of Vacant & Developable Land
A. Background:
Section 163.3191 (2) (b), Florida Statutes, requires Evaluation & Appraisal Reports to assess the
extent of vacant and developable land within the relevant jurisdiction. In Collier County, non-
residential development is restricted by the nature of the County's Future Land Use Designation
provisions. Therefore, it is safe, at least under current conditions, to assume that most vacant and
developable land will ultimately be developed either as residential property or as some type of
agricultural use.
B. Analysis:
Staffs analysis of the acreage and percentage of developed land, as well as that of the vacant and
developable land, in Collier County was generated utilizing the most current Co11ier County
Property Appraiser's Offiee (PAO) tax parcel data, (December 1, 2009). Staff summarized the
number of acres per Land Use Code from the Florida Department of Revenue's (FDOR) official
land use designations. Please refer to Tables 2.3-1 and 2.3-2.
1
Vacant & Developahle Land
Table.2.3.1
1 Siogle Family 76,507 94,925
2 Mobile Homes 3,489 2,722
3 Multi-family 91 888
4 Condominia 10,165 10,!~
>. mm............._..._.__ ...
5 cooperatives 51 325
6 Retirement Homes 16 336
7 es (institutional) 828 2,554
8 MultifamHy less than 10 units 1,986 607
11 Stores One. Story 474 443
12 Mixed Use, I.e., Store and Office 330 292
14 Supermarket 10 13
15 Regional Shopping Malls 4 70
16 Community Shopping Centers 174 933
r--.
17 OneStor)' Non. Professional Offkes 120 112
18 Multi. Story Non. Professional Offices 127 191
19 Professional Service Buildinl1's 46 43
20 Airports, Marinas, 8us Termin~.fs & Piers 47 84
21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 101 92
22 Drive in Restaurants 42 35
23 Financial Institutions 85 92
25 Repair Service Shops 27 23
--
26 Service Stations 55 37
27 Automotive Repair, Service, and Sales 181 226
I 28 .- .._--- ..
Parking lots, Mobile Home Sales 211 787
29 Wholesale, Manufactunng, and Produce Outlets 51 73
30 Florist, Greenhouses 11 39
32 Enclosed Theaters, Auditoriums 2 11
33 Night Clubs, Bars, and Cocktail Lounges 10 6
34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rings, Enclosed Arenas 8 16
35 Tourist Attractions 220 1,651
36 Camps 2 22
37 Race Horse, Auto, and Dog Tracks 4 555
38 Golf Courses 633 15,034
39 Hotels, Motels 79 213
41 Ught Manufacturing 275 336
42 Heavy Manufacturing 5 41
43 Lumber Yards, Sawmi1!s, Planning Mill!:; 15 26
44 Fruit, Vegetables, and Meat Packing 30 97
--
46 Other Food Processing 4 2
47 Mineral Proce$sir::~ 11 309
48 Warehouses, and Distnbution Centers 442 556
49 Industrial Storage (Fuel, Equip, and Material) 126 145
71 Churches 175 808
n Private Schools 32 403
-_..~....~.~~...~_...-.--..
73 Private Hospitals 15 180
74 HomeS for Aged 9 33
75 IOrphanages 195 1,262
76 I Mortuaries, Cemeteries 15 86
77 Clubs, Lodges, and Union Halls 22 111
78 Sanitariums, Convalescent, and Best Homes 4 28
79 CUlt~ 23 59
;"..%il,.
Source: 2Q09 Property -A~~pt3~Ser RecordS 8. CatHer County Gc:S 03t;)
2
Vacant & Developable Land
Table 2.3.2
o
10
40
SUBTOTAL
Sl
52
60
61
66
67
69
SUBTOTAL
70
SUBTOTAL
Vacant Residential
Vacant Commercial
Vacant industrial
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL
Cropland Soil Class 1
Cropland Soil Class 2
Grazing Land Soil Class 1
Grazing Land Soli Class 2
Orchard, Groves, Citrus
Poultry, Bees.. Tropical Fish, Rabbits, etc.
Ornamentals, Misc. Agriculture
AGRICULTURAL (Code 51~69)
Vacant Institutional
INISTITUTIONAl
29,658
1,115
204
30,917
128
121
845
2
268
455
309
2,128
558
558
105,199
1,657
584
107,439
18,959
41,883
85,106
1,258
57,660
2,659
3,386
210,912
15,996
15,996
Source: 2009 Properry Appraiser Records g CoWer County GIS data
Based upon the PAO's records, there are approximately 1)54,936 acres in Collier COl.U1ty,
Approximately 138,100 acres or 10 percent of Collier County consist of developed land. In
addition, 334,347 acres or 24 percent of Collier County consists of vacant and developable land.
Please refer to the map on page 2.3.4. The Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM) approved
by the BCC in January, 2009, as a supplemental planning tool projected that the build-out
population for the County would be approximately 950,223. Tbe most recent University of
Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimate for the County's current population
is 333,032 for April, 2009. The current population estimates (333,032) compared against the
amount developed land (138,100) equates to .415 acres of developed land per capita. Utilizing
this ratio against the projected build out population of 950,223 would yield a total of 394,343
acres of developed land to satisfy the projected population. The total acres of land developed
(138,100), plus the vacant and developable land (334,347) results in approximately 472,447 of
land either developed or developable or expressed another way 20 percent more developable
land than the population projections would require. It should also be pointed out that the current,
A 15 acres of developed land per capita is derived in part from antedated large lot zoning
practices such as the estates. Based upon the regulatory allowances of the GMP the future rate
of acres of developed land per capita is expected to diminish.
C. Summary:
..
.)
Vacant & Developable Land
Based upon the data analysis, Collier County appears to have a sufficient amount of vacant and
developable land to accommodate future gro\\-th. It should be noted that for the 2025 suggested
Horizon Year, the most recent University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research
projections for the County at year 2025 is 446,400, an increase of 113,368. Based upon the
existing ratio of dcveloped to developable land, the County can accommodate the population
projected for the Horizon Year. Below is the BEBR projection to the Horizon Year.
YEAR PROJECTION
2010 333,600
2011 339,786
2012 346,087 I
2013 352,505
2014 359,042
2015 365,700
2016 373,518
2017 381,504
2018 389,660
~____~T.
2019 397,990
2020 406,500
2021 414,184
2022 422,013
2023 429.991
2024 438,119
2025 446,400
4
Vacant & Developable Land
2.4 - Changes to Regulatory Environment
A. Background:
Section 163.3191 (2) (t), Florida Statutes, requires the Evaluation & Appraisal Report to assess
the relevant changes to the state comprehensive plan, the requirements of this part, the minimum
criteria contained in chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the appropriate strategic
regional policy plan since the adoption of the original plan or the most recent evaluation and
appraisal report update amendments.
B. Analysis:
The table on the following pages provides recognition of the statutory changes and their
relationship to the Collier Growth Management Plan
1
Statutory Changes
""":' 0-
tIl
~
U
~
.....:l
"0
Q)
Q.
o
"0
<
....
CO
~
Ot--
.cCO
<>;;;
.0;("")
N~
iii
.
N
,....
f? I III
. .s::.-c
o .~.~
.c :I: u:
U III m
.- -C _
~ .;::~
.... .Q a
.u.
II) Q) c
· .s::..Q
- --
O_1Il
(') 0 Q)
N_Q
. :: m
o Q..s::.
~f:;;
U lD C
.;: 5 1Il_
.00....;
~-<{~
""'Ec>.
(')...0_
. .e:g'~
o c:-e.s::.
~88.'5
<> Ul <{
..-.9 c: ==
.... III III
~ ~~o:::
.-C_-C
c.- Q)
to Q) ftI Q)
'ECt:a.
· <{ "C CI)
~..lD..c
'cOlD 0)
u Q..-
- Scn I
t--
M
T""'
-C
Q)
Q).s::.
- Ul
III =
::J.c
CTIIl
Q)-
-CUl
1IlQ)
>.m
;=
c '-
Q).E
32-c
o c
-Ill
2E
C Q)
Q)"C
E Q)
c '-
'- ::J
Q)-
>.2
0_
O)m
_m
~E
.Q.9
l!! CIl
.- lD
::Ju
CT...
Q) :J
'-0
OCll-o
- 0
-c >-.-
Q)Q.(j)
iU Q. a.
Q):JO)
'-CIlc
0....-
.. lD C
-_ C
MftllIl
S~Ci.
i
.- '"
S t::
0.9
t::C;
",-
~3
'"
;>.,t::
EO-
~
o
U
~
z
LO
t--
T""'
M
(")
<0
T""'
Ul
Q)
iU
Q)
(j
-C
Q)
::J-C
Ul Q)
.!!? a.
CIl 0
c:-C _
o III 0
:;:; ~
C:c .c
~ ~ iU
lD~ a.
-::J E
lDa. 0
"C Ul u
:!(j) muj
~'E :5c:
"Co c.2
:J ..... 0-
=~ CIl~
~E g'.5
~g-u):c~
:S:::_CC:.-
Q)~2;;:~
Q)Q).!!!lDftI
:5"C::J~:!:::
C _-
~.- Q) ftI-E
EIIl,--
~ "C.!.s::.
o 0 Q) m~
-oE~~
"0 ...... UJ .....
Q)-oQ)c
iUc-"CQ)
l!? ~ ~'> [
OCTmeo
.. :g-cQ..(i)
~.c-g.:-:..>
~ ~ ~ 0-8
co
M
T""'
(ii
o 0
-0
0)-
c-C
;c:
III III
(i)Ul
'- Q)
C:"
.2 5
-=8
E C
... Q)
0Q)u)
-~C
.5,t:; 0
....0>;:
o.c III
lDII)=
mc:jg
c:OUl
ftI';.!::
,C.- i::'
u g III
=,,~
Q) lD'E
.s::.1I)
-:J"O
o"Cc
_c:CIl
(/)ftlUl
Q)-"C
32"CQ)
> CD E
OllJc
a: &. (j)
.:-:.. E! ~
~Q.O)
0)
.!::
"0
c
III
E
E
o
u
Q)
:5
>.
.c
CIl
-
c:
Q)
E
E
o
u
CD
> a)
'fi 0)
C:c
&..2>
II)(/)
f~
'- '-
00)
-.s::.
Ul--
m.!!?
"O.s::.
.~ 0
'- '-
Q..m
.. u
-iE
eo
lD
~
ftI
-
.9
"C
0>
E
C
'-
Q)
>
o
0)
(ii
u
.Q
-c .
Q) c:
-0
u._
~-=
III :;
0:2
.?:-~
co
::Ju
00
u_
0> c:
.s::. .-
-II)
'--
.gc::
Ul Q)
Q) E
-cE
.~ 0
'- u
Q...s:::
u
-:J
~CI)
C
III
0>
.c
.9
c
o
~~
(ii.Q
-'-
~o
.- Ul
i::'>. .
jg"C'E
::J III
ESE
Q)Q)O)
:5:5 .!::
-_ c
000
Q)...N
>CD,-
:o:>.c 0
jgEO)
~ CD.!::
UlEE
l!! mill
~.5 Ci.
'-'0"0
O>>c
,Cc:1Il
-;0-;;;
l!! c: E
.- 0 0>
~u E
~!E E
.. 9 ~
e=&
...
Q)
c;
~
Q)c
:c Q)
.s S
o Q)
P-.@
~~
.5 ~
o
Q)
:E'
o
<(
z
t--
t--
T""'
M
M
<0
T""'
c:
o l!!
.. :::J
ftI '5.9
E ~ .!!! ftI ci.
o .s::.'- CDCIl
.... .....O):iE
.E -gt~.e-:g
~ Q)Q)0.s:::::J
.:; E "O:w IIJ-o
o lIl.2ft1'Ec
'-en .2cu:;ftI.!!!
a. _ _ ._.:: ~ Q)
.9; 20~CD3
Qi" ~~-1;)"5
Ucp EO~"O-
iE u E~.5;~
~.B ~ 0= = ~
._(1) OMEfo
-c ,- 0) 0) :J >.
~= (iic;E"'1Il
EftI g~~~~
E c:: - >..?:- III >
0'- l!!.c=30
oc: '--.coc
o)c: ::JC:O:>ulll
:s.!!! [~[~lG
Ul o~Eoc
Q)_ -mO-o
0)- -c u -c :0:>
~s Q):g0>Q)1Il
~E g>:::J~g>5,
o E ~ -g :c ~ '00
C 0 .:-:..', III u " Q)
~u~'-'-IIl'-'-C
-c: -
e.oe.. .
0)
M
T""'
N
-0
0>
"0
'>
e
~
~cO
:::J8
CIlN
...
CPT""'
aiGi
~.c
Q) E
.s::.Q)
-0
-0>
00
c_
o..
+:iC
a.:::J
0_
"Oc
III (I)
Q) E
c"o
=c
-0(1)
IIlE
~lU
(I) c::
:5.!!!
-0
Q)~
-go
Q) ~
XCI)
WlD
.. ;:
0":
Xu
<OftI
.........-
Q)
::0
<d
.g ~
P..~
c..<d
<..c:
.....u
ZC
" B
<..3
--5
ZtIl
.c
o
~
Ul-
o
J!3c
c..o
E;;
Glc..
X 0
Gl"O
m
"0_
Co
cu:>.
. - 0
l!! c
CU Gl
Gl ~
:>. c-
Gl ~
>-
'i::c
:>.0
....
GlC
> 0
Gl:OJ
c.!!I
CU'-
-E
c..=
.::J:.Gl
.....c
0.....
~ E
Q) 0
;':::(1)
0>..... .....
CCC
.- Gl Gl
iiiEE
"0"0"0
c..cc
~GlGl
....EE
.Ecucu
>-
>-
rn~
~ ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
u Cl) Cl) u
....:lO Ql) Ql) Ql) Ql)
- 0:1 ~ ~ ~ ~
0:1 Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)
... ... ~ ~ ~ ~
~< 0 0 0 0
1,& c: ] c: ]
~-5i ..I<i ..I<i
(,) (,) (,) (,)
::J] < < < <
u: ~
u
cZl
<
--
Z
....
.E
g>lZ
'c ~
C Ul
m'-
a.~
-g~
!!!iii
Glc..
.....E
.!!I 0
UlO
Q)C
=0
:>.Gl
..o:g
5~
:g~
c_
'00
.... .....
o C
OGl
o E
Gl t .
.ccuCIJ
..... c.. C
.... Gl 0
.EO;:;
II)Q)..!!!
Gl.cii
:2~...
~ -g ~
0: CU.-
.. :>.~
sg:!
o~=
smE
Gl (I)
..... III
m CD
(;) m
~ E-
i+:: .c
'13 C (I)
Ol .- "0
g- J!3 :u
.... C ~
OlOlCD
.cE-
(5c(I)
....'0
E~C
~O.!!
0>_
5 Iii l!
;;g2
cu_
Qio.9
c.. .....
OOlg>
00.-
oeiii
eCU-
-- Ci) ~
<(-'w Ul
UUle
o CU.Q
OlUl
II) "0 .-
~.:;; ~
.:; e Ci.
C-o..o>
Gloe
o::~:.;:::
.. III e
"-:OlOl
'0.13 ~
;:::ma.
S~.~
c..
:c
II)
'0
....
III
~
CD
-
(I)
"0
C
.!!
III
....
::s
'-
"0
(5
.c
Ul
Gl
....
.c
.....
Ol
0>
CU
Q)
....
o
CU
Q)ca
=CD
0>'-
elll
.- c..
"0._
~.c
011)
e"O
.- ...
-Ill
J!3~
iji.s
E(I)
.~ -g
i5-..!!
~ii
Ul'-
Ol::S
Ul....
'> III
Q)O>
0: .=
viii
Ie
. 0>
M.-
-Ul
"OGl
X"O
...- ....
"-0
--
~
c
::s
o
u
.
B
~
e
....
.E
I/)
Ol
v
.:;;
o
....
a..
N
'Ouj
X III
...-CD
..-'-
_Ill
:>.....
CU 0
E Ol
II) ~
::::J
"00
CD I/)
...Gl
u....
CD~
II) :J
~.....
"O~
C Q) .
..!!.c-g
-.....CU
ClIO-
... .....
~0>Q)
"'c:=
CD'- _
:o"Eo
III 0 Ul
... 0 0
CD 0;;
_COUl
(I) .-
C:gQi
~;#t>
=~~
CU.....CO
.ce.1::
.....GlO
Ul....
Q)~:g
32'O~
>.....cu
e cu'u
a.."Oi+::
.. Ol Q)
.~ e C
ID .2>..oGl
-Ul
"01/)....
::=::(UQ)
"'-Q).c
~.cO
.9
,<(
.cU
.210
.1::(1)
ai~
~'5
I C-
"OQ)
Q) ....
.~ iI) en
E-uc
Q)Gl
~BE
:c a.. E
m - Q)
o>c>
Q)CDO
.... e~
~c..~
c.2 0
:g~~
tt:::G).......
Q) "0 Q)
.~ l.!! g
iii'O.!!I
~ ;.~
g>_ I/)
_=cu
Ul--
Ql':~
32 C'c
>ClI.1::
e.o 0
a..~2
.;...:.. :>. Gl
Ol~"O
x~.>
"'-Ole
~"'O 0..
.9
~ Q) -
..... 0 0
.... e Ol
.E co 0>
E ~ ~
~ I/) ~
0> cu Ul
e -g Iii Q)
0.. ca .~ =
co=..2 .9
g>;;: lrl u
'0.:..... Ol
mCOl g-
0>1lI32 Ol
~-e~ ~
I/) ~ a .....
g>-g .9 .~
.- cu 1/).
-gUl<( O>Q)
i+:: ..... U .= iii
Q) .g, 0 -g iii
~ ;: lZ i+:: Gl
cu e.: g,! =
Cii Ol ~ .- C
.0, E c- . iii .-
Q)o..~UlCii.!!
-; .Q .... c 'o,:!
Q)g,!eQ)Q)C
:EGlCDeE-;e
>"0 cQ)
e- c..Qi"O..!!!
a.. ~.2 > .:;; .0
.'Q)CDOOca
C...... > L...~
-UlCD-a.....
;:: e "0 ~ .;...:..~
s~f.Qsca
...-
l-
I-
..-
M
~
(0
I/)
Ol
.....
co
Ol
(j
o
v
...-
II)
e
o
E
c
;;:
CD
"'C
I/)
Q)
"0
.:;;
o
....
a..
C)C
.=8-
=~
;-g
"OUl
~2
o Q)
II) Ul
II) :J
CD-
U co
()~
III e
.....Ol
'E 32
.... Ul
Q)Q)
0......
O~
.....E
J!3co
c-
QlOl
E"Cl
C e
Qi'w
>....
g,.E
_ "0
~~
00
-;;NI/)
Gll/)O>
NCOC
'e ~ '0
~co~
"5.5 c
<(.!'iij
..-t
eg~
fi
M
o
I/)
Ul
Q)
o
o
co
e
cu
u
2
iii
e
o
o
.9
.....
E
....
Q)
C
~
:J
..0
m
.E
e
o
~
ll)
~
.~ ~
o..~
Ooca
<C...c:
aU
zc
II .9
<E
........ 0:1
ZVi
,(/)
~ c:o
CD
> ~
'iro8.
~~o
:g,~c:
Q.~~
ClJCD.....
CD ::c ~
5{gCD
e 0 E
o:t:: 0
::rog
... C'T
>ro~
CIJ-ro
-aro.....
.- "'0 CD
:t:CD"'O
CIJ_O
c:5iE
ro ..... .....
CDCDO
"'C .0 CD-
.2=E
0:=0
,5 _ 0
t) 'c ,5
:J=S~
E~.Q
- - -
'c - CD
:J ~ E
01- 0
~23g
Q) ~'T
:=::::=
"'Cro.Q
c:
>'CD.!!!
i5....c: a.
a..... CD
ro - >
0,_
0_11)
-c:c:
fIICDCD
=c:..c:
C 0 CD
=0.i5.
CDEE
coo
=00
a; g>_1I)
~'ii)c
"O=SCD
:::.,.oE
""..c: c:
o CD"'"
II) - CD
1I).c >
CD roo
u"'O 01
uo-
CIJ:t:: ~
c:roo
~~-;
CD-c:
o 01'-
.....c-
0'- l:
_.?;oCD
II),~ E
CD-CD
"'Oro-
,- (/) CD
>(/)01
e"'Oc
a. (ij'ii)
" := =s
LOoo
__..c:
<::
Z
<::
Z
.5
'"
~
o
j
30
'" l':
,5 g
gu
'E
o
z
<::
Z
:s
fi
..-
en
..-
('I')
M
co
..-
CD
:;
"'0
(ij
.....:=
o~
_=S
('I')
"<t
..-
'"
'"
CI)
-6
"0
<lI
13 u.l
.gpO
CI) CI)
~ ..s
o ....
s:: 0
~ N
<:: ,~
'-'
CI)
:E'
o
CIJ
-a
'i:
o~
iL CD
'06
.
~
-
N
('I')
~t-
cot-
N~~
~('I')('I')
oMM
~ ~ ~
.
,.
c
ro
..c
-
.....
CD
..c:
...
ro
.....
I
..0
:::l
CZl
....
CI)
<;j
~
r.2E
~ E
~~
""!
"0
fa
~l::
o CI)
.~ ~
~~
~ 8
N~
. CZl
""! s::
- CI)
>,0..
,~ 0
o
0..
~
-;::
CI)
;>
o
-<
CZl
2
I
u.l
~
.....:l
t.<...
>,
.~ V)
:::'Q
'-'00
<lIo
t.<...,
"'~
00
..81
'-' ....
CZl s::
CI)
,~ s
-CI)
..0 _
c:u.l
"<t
-c
CI)
t:l/}
-c
CI)
~
o
s::
~
'-'
<::
~
CD
~~
=c
~CD
..... E
o2~
g'::;
'ii) W
'> :n
e"E
o.w
.i:'E
Ci~
i e
c..E
"0 ._
c_
CIJ19
-.-
.el'D
.~o
~ _II) "'
CDC..::::;
~g~
"'C ~,~ ~
<1l1ll"C..OO
"'0 II) 0.. C
"'C ._ ...,. ell
<{..c........:::
':~ -0 u
~; z C
~:UII~
-..c <c +-'
M'"'C....... ell
-roziZi
~
..-
-
"<t t-
co co
..- ..-
('I') ('I')
('I') M
(0 (0
..- ..-
.....
o
l'D
CD 'L:
01 CDO
m ~......c:
=s l3.?:-0
g> . lIl'E c:
.!!! t) ~ 'x ,g
..........oro
Q)-O....-o.....~
.....-gc"'OO'E
=s oroCD=
1ii~;:;~II)OCD '
(j).U -..c:1I)
,- .CD,s 23 0- c
CDUOCC-O.!!!
--I c ... CD ';: (ij a.
CD.!!D.EO:=CD
..c: ii "0 -g 0 0 ,2:
~E;CJ):::::::~
-0 EC5CD
t::UIIIl'DBo..c:
OC~1iil'DO~
- .:.c: ..c '-...... a.
CD: ......"'OOE
.......11I roc:
oOD.~1I)08
- C III '> :g"'O 01
<(.2>O=SIl)C
(J - -..... c ,-
oc1;o.-g.2-g
CD;;::;;:~J!!~CD
..eCD 'O_-E
-"'OCDwoliro
II)CD:;1ii>.-_
~.eOCD~II)O
.5.......'-~.=~
II) 0._:::.,.0
... "0 c - "" c
'" C ,- .;..:.. ro CIJ CD
0:: CD l:: E 0._ =s
"eCD-E=o-
CO<c~~8E~
..-
"<t
..-
N
"<t
..-
~
G)
N
fft.A
Co
o
N
.c
(J
."0
c
CIJ
o
G)
~
10
o
o
N
.e
(J
~
Ci
'(3
_ C
-, III
.i:' .5
:: ....
:c :
'in ~
III 0
.!-;;;
:! ffi
U;~~
~ C >
-g f .~
CIJ-~~
N 0 w.Q
C ....._
~ 0 0.11)
:; E III
'2 o.e
;;:: 0=
CD-o..2:0
"0 CD-
CD ,: ~
:; &'E
wo
0::8
..:-:.. 0
NCD
-=
.
.
,...
10
~
10
o
0"'0
N CD
.e :g
2,<{
10
O"<tLO
O"<t"<t
N ..-
>,
,~
o
0..
EEO
... 0 =s E
CIJ.....-o...
CD-co2
=1"af~CD
1t)~~:5
ro CDc...
CD g> ... ,- C
"'0 ,- 0 -a CD
.2-g;::CDe
o=sC'sCD
,5 - ~ C CD
~~~1!i:D
c'ii) =s III III
ro-a.=-
_ =s CD III
0.0 g> CD g
CD . ,- .0 _
,2: J! -g t) ~
II)c=s=s-
CCD-EC
~ e..... ~
CDCD~230
o..>cc_
E2CDCDC
oc..EEe
oEE~QI
CD-CDOCD
..c:-III >......
... oa.CD
-o:!:: OlE III
CD c.. ... .-
L...1II<1l--
'S U ..c: 19 C
0-.... - .- QI
CDoOo.e
0:: QI .....- ~ c..
'::i ~CD.2
~-a.Q~~
~1 ~:5 QI
-UCD_-a
elll-oOl'D
_ 01
o C
QI'j
ni.Q
'[Iii
=g
Ii'ii)
=.- CD
cE;.c
; i5.~
CD-ac
:;,S,g
... CD 0
o2Gi2
_ot)
c ,c
CD(/) 0
E 1: 0
"'0 CD-
CEO
CD CD CD
E>1ii
roO-o
ci5.CDB
.!!!E:;c:
a. .- ro
"'0 Iii ,5 ,5
CD~CD-o
.: lit 01 0
~offi>-
Cl).....c:'O
0::00"'0
"~-O CD
"'":.gffi:m
~ CD II) i5..
SQ.-5~E
roll)l'Do
-CD "'0 0
6::5 g- ~
CD
:;
'0
CD>.
s::.O
U c:
II) ~
... '-
C ::I
CDO
E c:
CD 8
~ E
... '-
Q,Q)
E'"i'
._ 0>
_c:
III 0
...-
"Q.m
1lI"C
U Q)
EO.
... 0
CD"C
+tm
OJ(/)
c: m
os::.
;]iE
"CEQ)
-~ E Cii
~~~
Olo.....
0::: 0> 5i
.: (ij E
"COOl
cO .Q 0>
coOlm
Xfi fij
~~ E
<
Z
0>
c:
B
'iii
(5
o
s::.
o
(/)
s::.
o
:c
~
>.
..c
0;-
0>
0>
.... .
"C
'- Ol
Ol.....
..co.
00
..... "C
om
Q.Q)
Ol..c
lOUi
"C::I
'OE
CD (/)
-.....
CD c:
-Ol
~E
,. Ol
- '-
m'-
-::I
_0"
COOl
- '-
....
u
-
'"
~
..
'"
U I::
>>",
0-
_t:I..
U >>
ofi~
.....0..
o ::l
I::tZl
,~
-
0..
o
""
<
Q)
fi
c:
o
a.
::1,-
"Cl!!
Q)m
~ ~
..c .s.?
Q):O
..c::l
00.
.....0
c-;;
0)0
E+=-
~:o
O)"C
Olm
(/)c:
~~
"CII)
C:CD
m::
-Q,
~Q,
::I::J
-Sll)
..... ...
Q)CD
fi1iS
lI)~
0)-
,= 0
~~
Ol.- ,
0:::~U)
;"':'1lI,~
m= ~
x~'o
~1lI~
(/)
.....
_c:
cue
ii)'C
cuO)
0.....
um
.....~
00>
.....c:
C:'-
Ol~
EO
Ol ~
-.....
0)0
Olc:
(/)0
::1.-
"Cm
c:e:
~O)
0) (/)
'- Ol
::1'-
.....0.
.20)
.....s::.
m..... '
s::.0)~
..... o>u.
C ~ -
0)::1......
EO~
O)ON
,= 5i ~
~Ul <Ii
~ ::I c:
E'-
"C "C
"Cli)O)
<(CDc:
. - ;:; i.i::
-cO)
~::J"C
-Oll)
~um
....
U
~
~
..
'"
U I::
>>",
0-
_t:I..
U >>
...<::-
_0..
.....go
otZl
I::
,~
-
0..
o
""
<
0) 'E
.~ co (ij I m
s::.o Oc: ~
~a..QOl .B
~'-'-Ol""'"C
"Cool!!s::.O)C: C'
O)c:m.....s::.m.....::I~
m .- ~ >.1- Q) 0 0 C:Ol
o ..c ..... 0
"C.....(ij <limc-E
a. c: c: "C "C'~ Ol 0 "C
::Imol!!O)'-EC:C:
Ol-+=-oOla. 00)
..c 0.:0 ~ c: 0 g-"C E
o ~ m 0) >.= - lI) m
:; a..b (/)i5..-g ~c-
c g-"C Q) 0.0.0) 0) 0
CD(/)C:~::IO)"CEC:
E '- m 0) ~"C O>"C .Q
CD l!! II) '- Ol .2,~ c: a.
a; mo"C.....o"C 0)0
~CDc:mc:::IE"C
:; - "0' m ~ :;: (3 m m
1iS :! ... 6 ~ ~ .~ .c '0
~ 0 Q, ,- - E . 0 >.
'Ol ~ m ~ ~ ~ 0
.!! Ol Q, e: '~ c: :;:; c:
..c'-Q,Ole~= ,0)
1lI"C::J(/)a.a.o~~
o.!!lI)a(/)':":~=Ol
Q,m:D 0:: o~2:-=
O)"&.1iS"CO)~Q.::IOl
fi::l ~ fij Ol ~g-~fi
"CC: EQ.(/)OlC:
O)mCD~oa.,-.....o
'-.....>u.....::IOlm
';5 0:;: ,~c (/) Iii ~ 6
0" (/) III 0 Ol '- :> Q) ,-
O).cC,- 0);>>1ii
O:::c:Da.EIii(ij+=-~
;...:.o~~E~c:mE
oEllIa.Ol....oE=
X co Q) g- ~ gJ 'Ol l!! 0)
~....= (/) o>>.~(ij=
0)
=
>.
..c
"C
Ol
lI)
(/)
0)
....
"C
"C
m
(/)
.!!
'iii
.....
o
E .
.!!c
(/)CD
~E
O)~
s::.CD
-;CD
.....u
II) III
>.Q,
III II)
!;
SQ,
III 0
~'O
"CC
0) III
"CC
"Co
<(:;:
III
m!
xu
CO CD
-...
""
U
tlI)
""
c:.l
~
o
I::
..::.:
U
<
II)
CD
-:;:;
(/)"-
::I'"
E.,g
........
c: ::J
OlCU
E>.
~c..
OlQ,
c: ::J
011)
,- ...
Iii,!
,S cu
'E~
0-
Olll
OC
-0
m.-
.....OJ
C:CD
Q)...
E.c
C:~
Q) ~
>c:
00
0>'-
....-
Ol m
_C:
C:'-
.- "C
0)....
.cO
1-8
(/)
....(/)
- Q)
.c '-
-"C
-"C
!e..co
c:
.g
~ ~
~:a
.::l a
.....os::
o U U
00-8
, o:s U
~S::53
.~ a
"0 E
t:I.. II)
;>
o
o
(/)
(/)
~
"C
"C
m
.B
II)
III
e
III
~
s::.
II)
'0
...
III
~
CD
-
II)
'0
C
.!!
iii
...
::J
...
~g>>
';5"iii
0"=
0) 0
O:::s::.
.: CD
~:s
V III
~~
-0
....It:
~1lI
>>
,~
"0
t:I..
-~
~::>
'';:: ......:i
U[..r.,
F'o
0<"'1
~~
;;<
";;j
o
o
c: (/)
o 0)
"C'- ,
0) 0 E
E8.O)
....(/)s::.
.g"C::::
Q)O)o
Q. Ul l!!
=0
Ol>'a.
..cc:
>.coO
CD _ -;;
~-:c:
= III 0
- CD'-
-... (/)
II) ill'S;
.!! C) e
uca.
CD"-
a..~ l!!
II) CD m
'OU::l
CD CD 0"
......Ol
II) Q,"C
.- - co
;s::.Ol
II) ....
"C'O::I
Q)"'(/)
.... III c:
'3 ~ Q)
O"CD.....
Ol ... (/)
0:::(1)::1
..'OE
tOC-
---"!!c
~ iii :g
.......0)
....=....
_... a.
ll')
,~
"0
t:I..
u
.i;
U
U
:0
o
......
;;<
";;j
o
o
o
"0
'0
o
s::.
...
CD
E
m
,~
.c
,~
:0
m
Ul
0)
0)
o
c:
m
,~
"C
'-
o
c:
co
'0
m
c:
Q)
Ul
::I
:::E
Q)
:D
o:s
.~ ~
-agp
t::I.o:s
<t:...t::
aU
Ze-
II .8
-<.8
__ o:s
ZiZi
CO
"C
.....
.....
't:J
CD
...
o
0.
.c
CO
't:J
...
nI
~
CD
-
&Io.~
o
a>
00
~
"Om
~f
_ nI
~.e.
C.c
roco
1D''E
> nI
,5 ~
u.!
cco
0't:J
:;:;c
~.!!
.....-
u nI
..... ...
.22
to
.f' on >. >. .f' on
.t:: V) .~ V)
- on ~~ :;::~ =~
.- . "0 "0
"0 <.,)00 <.,)00 <.,)00
<l) ~o ~oo ~o <l) ~ ~o
Cl/) ~, ~9 ~, Cl/) ~,
"0 "'~ "'~ "'~ "0 "0 "'~
<l) 00 00 00 <l) <l) 00
~ 0 1 0 I ..81 ~ ~ 0 1
0 ..c: ..c: 0 0 ..c:
s:: <.,)E <.,) - <.,)E s:: ] <.,)E
..::.: rI:l <l) rI:l s:: rI:l <l) ..::.: rI:l <l)
u <l) <.,) <.,)
<: .~ E .~ E .~ 8 <: <: .~ E
- <l) - <l) - <l) - <l)
.D _ .D _ .D _ .D _
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
<:
--
z
B
't:J
C
ClI
- C
-a>
ClI..c
:;:=
~"O
:::::I C
o ro
;:-
aa>
ClI.~
.....
't:J --
c~
ClIa>
CD 00
0>>
ClI=
0.19
coc
c a>
CDE
0. C .
0000
:=.~ ~
oca>
=a>u
ro 00
o ro.~
............c
"0 COO
a>ro"O
.~ 1:: ro
>0:=
a> 0. a>
a::E.....
..'- 00
.....:., 00 01
<riroc
....-.........-
"OOOC
x~.Q>
..- ';U :z
~.o m
a>
.D
.~
...
c
CD
E
CD
a;
co
CD
~
o
J!
'0
o
.c
o
co
.~
:c
:::::I
0.
0.
o
"0
ccs
Ui
~
~
.....
C
a>
E
a>
a;
.!!!
..c
.....
N
....-
-
01
C
"0 vi
"> ~
e c
o.ro
Em
o E
.l::~
... ~
CD'-
> u
.- c
ClI._
~ ro
<{~
.. u
-.....
.Da>
-"0
"Oc
C ~
ro"O
-a>
~:=
N.Q
..- -
_ ro
-
o
a>
00
- ~
C"O
Oc
..ro
nI _
o co
Onl
_CD
0'"
o nI
a>'ii
"0..
::J C
oCD
c't:J
'0 'jij
.....CD
a>'"
.DO
- .
ECDf
00 - CD
EClI-
Ea;
a> .- ,c
~~co
0"'>>
..... 0. 0
.!!! co c
--CD
"000)
a>0...
-o.ca>
cOE
~~ CD
x 0 00
UJcro
.. 0 00
0)'- 0
--0
_ClI,c
NOU
s.2 rn
a>
..cc
..... .-
Ol~
.~ :=
UOO
'Ci. C
a> a>
"OE
~~
roo
Eo..
-8 .~
'>-
e8
0.-5
000
-;;"0
..... c
Cro
~~
E8
g?-5
000
01:= 00'
-a>
~cg-
.QoE
"Oeoo
~oc
.-.- 0
i} 'tii ~
~.2g
;..:.. Iii U
5Cii~
NljiB
~c>2
a>
..c
.....
-
o
c
o
..
c..
o
't:J
ClI
...
.2
.!!!
:::::I
't:J
CD
.c
o
co
ro
..c
.~
:0..;
ro c
.....a>
00 E
a> a>
0-
.....a>
<{OO
u.~
Cl~
"0 '0
~~
'50
0"0
a>,c
a::u
00
8.2
-:0
N~
::::'0.
o
o
..c
U
00
.2
:0
::J
0.
ro
a.
o
"0
ro
o
.....
a>
.....
::J
~
.....
.2
>>
-
'ii
C
CD
Q.
u
a>
..c.
~"E
.D a>
SE
00 a>
UJa;
;...:...~
=.....
N'5
..-ccs
--
~ ~
a> a>
~ ~
vi
ro a>
0. ~
o ~
a;..c"~
~ j ~
"00_
B t>> ~
oo~B
c-g~
a>COO
E 'm ;::
E(J)~
a> ::J U
> 00 a>
0..........
Oloe
- - 0.
~OO"O
o a> C
-:2ro
00 >
~el1
roo.c
:; -5 .~
8:ciii
c:=c
UJ = 8
-c-
5.2 ~
...! ~
~ > 00
co~;::
~.- 00
CDS~
~E'c
;..:..E8'
MOU
..-0 a>
-= ~
C.....~
roo.....
0.-.....
0"0 a>
-a>>
g?~o
a> a> 00
"OOO~
000'-
....."- ~
ooroa>
-a>oo
c .....
a>ro-O
Ea>C
c ..c ro
.......... 00
g? oo.~
oa>;::
01:;"5
-OOro
roc-
U a> U .
.Q..c=.......
oou.D..-
a>:c~'V
~:=a>~
~:: -m ('I')
o ~~ro?
U ClI 0" to
C't:Ja>....-
UJc-g.
_:::::I 00
co..ca>
o .Cl :t= a>
:;; CD := (/)
~.~uvi
co~a>"'"
~CD~~
CD co a>
zcOOo
-caQ)~
.;.....:...a..c.....
...,....=x
..- :::::1'- a>
_= := c
a>
..c
I-
>.
o
~ c .
-CD "0
ct:2
CD :::::I a>
EOQi
CDC"O
CD 0 00
... 0._
~ON
0-
nI.cc
000
o co:;:;
'i:.....~
,!.2oo
Coo.D
.- ...... :1
.!!ljicn
OEo
o a> "0
.c.: C
~i}a>
.~ ~~
't:J -00.....
CD .Cloo.....
'ii :::::I a> ccs
CD o......c
Q. a> "0 0
CD .c~'-
... .....'" co
"00':;:
~;::2
'5 ~ Q.
O".D _
a> ro :::::I
a::g9
..0._
a:g-g.
Q)
::c
ell
.~ ~
o..gf
c..~
<:..c:
-u
~Q
II .B
<:a
-- ~
Zoo
.~
to
.......
.......
..-
M
ro?
co
..-
to .......
...,. ...,.
....- ..-
~
z
E
~.E
<( C .
WOrJ)
rJ)oc
~oCl)
-......E
o ~CI)
1:: Cll.:
Cll rJ) :J
o.rJ)tT
rJ) CI) Ol
0'-
CllCl)......
- C C
~......CI)
:o:::cE
C CI) Ol
Cl)E-
!2C1)Ol
B Ci).~
~O~
..' 0'-
C.L:O
:JOJ!!
0rJ)-
000
.- 0
.c1l.L:
U :J 0
l'Il a. rJ)
~ rJ).2
~:a
.E.S ~
l'Il-olO
o..~O
-oCl)O
Cl)CI)N
.: C ~
:J rJ) CI)
gCl)c
a:: Ol CI)
C.L:
"CU...
LO.L: 0
_0......
~
c(
W
~
0'0 .
.,g 1:: .~
u Cll <D
II) o.~
~:gt;
1ic5
::SO:o:::
a.; a.
E ~ E
e ii g,l
->CI)
-ocp......
CI) CD CI)
......~CI)
E-oE
g,l ~B
Ol ~ CI)
rJ)c~
.~ :J :0:::
c=:Ua
:J.L: 0
8rJ)>.
......cOl
CllCD.L:
SE;;
-oCDCI)
~ CD.S
.- II) E
>CD'-
e.- CI)
Q..:;W
;..:..'U -0
t:.J!.9
rJ)
rJ)
CI)
....
-0
-0
Cll
o
-
rJ)
-0
Ol
CI)
C
W
:2:
(.)
(.)
<
Z
<X> 0
t- <X>
...- ...-
(") (")
(") (")
<0 <0
...- ...-
(IJ
CI) LL
-0 .
:J -0 r--: E
-COCl)
gCllN~
'e; (ij ~ ~
...... C . C
......O(/)CI)
ijj~.S C
E~-oa
Ol 0 CI) C
Ci)~.E8
(ij CI) Ol -0
......(:-OCl)
:g CI) (/) .:
o rJ) Cll :J
O~rJ)tT
o o.c ~
cBeCll
CI) -0 't:: rJ)
E ~ 2;Cll
~:Jg!~
.- CI) > 0
:J.o 0
g = .S .c
.....- ~ u
rJ) ~ '- CI)
"'0 _ 0 =
cCll~-o
Cll:5(ijCl)
a. rJ) ._ -0
x CI) 0-0
W._ <D <(
;..:..lirE;":"
-9iU E ~
~~8~
<X> 0>
~ ~
...- ...-
>.
.-::: Vi
- V)
.- I
<Joe
ClIO
~,
"'~
00
..81
<J.....
tIl !::
l!)
.~ 8
- l!)
.0 _
~Ul
-0
Ol
C>
-0
CI)
~
o
C
~
o
<(
-0
Q)
Cl
-0
CI)
~
o
C
~
o
<(
....
0,-
CI)CI)
0;1:::
CllCll
nUl
C L-
.- Cll
CI) CI)
.0>-
010
......c
CI) Cll
CD.L:
E::
=CI)
U.L:
CIS......
....Cll
L-
c-
Oli)
.- L..
-CIS
CIS CD
1::>-
8-M ~
III C E
C'- L-
l'Il:5 CI)
::.~ a.
_ Cl
-cc
CIS 0'-
.- -0
-00=
.~ 2 ..5
5-iil'Q
Cl)5-
a::o~
":-::,,,L....o
oOlL-
--0 a.
-co.
~:JCll
-0
CI)
Cl
-0
CI)
~
o
C
~
o
<(
C
Cll
_0. :g
.S Cll :0:::
>-.-
B~:goTI
rJ)-E-oijjJ!!
~:::J~t::c:
~ o.:Joro
CI).S 0 0:0::: ~
L--o-oCl1l
~CI)IllOt::lll
> 00......
(/).- CI) Cll a. C
llllll.o rJ)CI)
c..~=ccE
OlCI)IllCll~o.
O.o.L: L-...... 0
x rJ) ClL-Ci)
Ol in' Q; in'.E >
.....E>E-CI)
C .- 10 -0
CI) -1ll......_CI)
E~~ccL-
OCl)CI)O-o
~o.L:E:O:::c
':; "fi I- c ~ ~
tTrJ) <D rJ)=
CI) ui>.o'E
L-oCllO:J'-
~ii ~ Cl rJ) C
c:JCllroBJg
CI) a....... 0 _ L-
c-ococ:J
:JcCl)-lllc
ulllE<(:Jlll
c a. rJ)
oco ':;c
02Ci)co.;S
CI) III > CI) .-
~'E~E.Q~
o. a.CI)-oQ.CI)
oWL-cQ)'"
-c-oECI) o III
~~~Cll~~
-
c
Q)
OlE
.L:CI)
;:::iJj
o c
~o
Lri;
Cll
>-t::
.20
- a.
o rJ)
Q..c
Cll
t=
>-
U .
CC
CD~
~a.
~
:J CI)
o.~
c rJ)
o c
o CI)
.L:
C)CI)
C L-
._ a.
cE
l'Il 0
L.. 0
C)CI)
~.L:
0-
....c
11)'-
c>>-o
CCl)
= -0
CD:J
'Ou
.- C
:J._
C)CI)
-0.0
~ 0
.-......
:J III
tTc
CI) 0
a:: .-
-
,;...:..D.
-0 CD
-0
->e
ec>>
......
c
CI)
OlE
.L:CI)
:::w
o c
100
Lri~
Cll
>'1::
.20
- a.
0rJ)
Q..c
~
I-
iil rJ)
c:J>:gJ CI)
.2EC)L- .0
~rJ)C>>Cll'Q_
_c-c rJ)
~oeorJ):Jo
8.~';)~~Eijj
IIlCl)c>>CI)OI-t:
co>oEO:J
l'IlX._X 00
::CI)~W2LL5
-0 CI) CD;' III .0
CI).L:_CI)crJ)
-.... c.....- c
~ Ol ~ 0 2 ~.Q
ii 13 a.; ro ro iU
CllcEg.rJ)c1::
iilCl)OocoCOO
Cl)Eu)(.L:-orJ)
rJ)~l'IlCDOCC
co a. 1:: CD :J Cll co
.L:E .c~~~
......._o_rJ)coco
c L- a..... CI)
CI) 0 0.0.--0
E-:J Ol>-c
crJ)CI)CD2.o:o:::
L-~"~~-o~
CI)=co.......Q)
> CI) CIS ~ rJ) 1:: .-
0-0 :J>.orJ)
Ol':; = o.~ a. CI)
ro Cl'- = a. -0
oCl)~~-g~.9
.Q.c.... E _L-
_......cc>> cO
- - c>> ... CI) 0 'C
;..:..CI)';)o-o:o:::
Clc'-E:Jcou
-.2l1lou1::Ol
I"'C...cO~
_ a. 0 0.'- o.:J
~~P'Oiil~~
->eOlc:Jcoo
eCD.ol'llE~o
~
CI)
OlC
.S CI)
:J (:
.~ ~ co
BB'Q
....; Ol
.g ~ g
0.= co
.... 0.:J
Ol 0.rJ)
'5. :J .!!!
a.CI)-
:J~O
rJ)S CI)
L-l'Il......
2~{g
Cll CD CI)
~....L:
:5~;.
.~ g-.o
c,,~
.Q _CIS -g
iU -CI) =
~L-CO>-
:J:J>o
rJ) rJ) Cll c
cCOlCO
OQ).oa.
00_:J
-0......=0
Ol~?:g
's Ec-
tTCI)CI)o
CI) a. E CI)
a:: Cl a. iU
.. cOo
roi5'ii!E
-=>1:::
~..5 ~ ~
t-
Q)
:0
o:l
.~ ~
-co
~~
<l;..Q
....u
~ C
II E
<l;E
__ o:l
Zen
>. -
.0-0
~l!l2
Q)c:o.
L.. Q) 0
roE-o
c: Q) ro
OL..lIl
:;:i'- "-
0.:J~
Q) 0- c:
OQ)Q)
xL..E
Q)Q)-o
>.lIlc:
OQ)Q)
c::5E
~Q)co
:JQ)-O
g E ~
o ~ ro
Olll.o
:J,
C:EO:::
,Q Il) <(
rooill
t:0Q)
ON..c:
0. _~
en "r"""" c: ....;
C:>.Q)~
ro-.c-
.::~~~
, 0 L.. :J
ro~OO
Q) L.. - 0
L..OCOO
ro 'e:: 0 L..
C 0.0 Q)
o O)N >
'5. oS: ...-- ~
Q) ~ 0
O III >,,-
'--..c:
~~.s~
OJ
c Q)
L..~ >..
:J C .-=: V) ....
Q) ......Q) -on
Q)E 2E -0 -0 ,- I 'u
Uoo
:5~ Q) Q) "'0 '"
L...c 0) 0) ~, ~
'OW .ElIl -0 -0 ",ex: '"
C -0= Q) Q) 00 0
~O Q).o ~ ~
O)~ 0 I 0
10; 0 0 ..s::::: ..s:::::
>.ro -olll U .... U
Q)Q) C C CI) = CI)
ot: -<( ~ ~ II)
=8.. ~:2: 0 0 ,~ S ,~
o III <( <( - II) :0
.0 _
Q..c: c:o ~~ ;j
ro ~I- p.
lJ <(
<C <C
---
;z: ---
;z:
Q) Q)
oS: lIl..c:
E -- ~
CD:g~Q)
Q)0~:5
-o..c:-oC)
lIlQ)C
o ~ ~__
........c: ,_-0
U)......EQ)uj
'Eo.o~5
oCG:Jx:;::;
u c.. III ill 0.
eE.8ai~
c.-......rox
"- c (/) -0 Q)
<<IO:J (/)
.....- E 0..,_
.= 1ii :J E
ca ~ (/) C 'e:
E 0 E Q) ,-
0c..8EE
......U)Q)Q)Q)
c;L..W-o
al..al(/)Q)
E-(/)........c:
II)Q)C......
EE:5Q)~
al.__E>
>COal-
0._>..>0
0) E 1:...- e ~
Iii ro 0. ,-
o~EE-o
.Q 0 E -- :!2
-o(;':::JliiO
Q)o(/)_.c
L....... <( 'a (/)
'3..... ,ro ~
O"L..-oo..c:
Q)Q)Q)-......
rv ..c: ..c: ro ,0
LL. ...... 0 :J o~
"Q)roco
~i~ffi;::
- I-
C C 10
oCDOO
,- E I
roCDwalo
t: 0) > :5 '01
8.. CG ~ -0 Q)
(/);alSro
c ...... \,u L..
~E~cCi5
t~gEal~
oc-o ......
CDroEo
~~~~;
E~:JOo
t:c~O>ro
ro 0 al Iii o.E
g- u .9 g__
o 5 -- >.
Q)..c~ffi
..c:CGall-al
:;;~E,......
:!:::&.g-~~
~lI)w~;e
~;ii)o..E
.- .. _ C 0
10 ... '"' "- +oJ
~CO=~CD
:JO)'Eco..c:E'
III c'- lIl-
C;al-oalal
o co - L.. 0>10
~g,~~.9>..
al ,- 0 C ~ en
,= ~ o.~ am
~-oOlll~-o
alo......al-o~
0::: ::: -;,~ -s L..
"OCDC:Oal
E'~:; ~~E
>-
u
c
CD
..
..
~
u
c
o
u
E
..
CD ,
'"i'lIl
0)-
C 0
o 0
_,c
roU
U)
-..
00
c_
2e
0. CD
0-
-oU)
ro>-
U)
-0_
Q) c:
~ CD
.QE
<i:&
..:-:..ca
ro c
Xca
~E
o
co
...-
cry
C'".i-
COC
Cll ..- CD
:J ,e
(/)lIlCD
,!a 0) 0)
o oS: cca
~-o
(/) C CG
c~E
Clllll>-
E:5u
C'- c
L..~CD
Q)o..
~C~
O>cU
-oC
co; 0
Oou
.Q2e
-oUi..
~CCD
;>o"t
000)
=CllC
<(00
-c-
c Cll ro
.2 E 0
oE:::
CD 0 0
U)OQ)
:>0:0
.........:J
CD III (/)
~Iii(/)E
":-:"~~CD
O'-L-"
-o.roll)
(j)o..c>-
_CO,_ I/)
"C
C '
CGCll
c.Q
oC:
.- Cll
1iilll
~-
-0
calll
>-
WQ)
>
oS: ~
Co>
Oc
~.>
COo
:JL..
- 0..
~E
Cll--
-o,S:
~ III
,- (/)
:JQ)
O"L..
Q)O>
0:::0
L..
-0.
c_
Oo
;:;....
uo
CDc..
U)CD
3;0::
CD-
z:
-.-
- - CG
- ..
-oc..
Xc..
~<C
>..~
coc
~2
-o(/)>-
ro '--
e~=
L..8:S
.ECll1ii
-0.0 c..
IV...... E
-olllO
c:Ju
coEL..
(;jE~
~.! 'w
'~ ~5
Q) en 0
lIl_Cii
o~:JE
-0
~ElIl
Q)..E
-Glco
ro'C-orn
.c-Cc
......uroo
1; "QCi5 ..
Q) GI '.~
E-lIl'tl
Q)l!E.!
'5 en {g ~
o-CD c.....
~,c~c
-(/)CD
~CI-U
-oOo.!!.
"ClIlo"C
<(~L.1.CG
":-:"::.c,c
oo:!:::~
:s. J!! ~ 3;
-
co
C
o
;
0.
o
(5
..s
>-
u
c
f
..
~
u
c
o
u
'0
o
,c
u
II)
-0
Cll
L..
'3
0-
Q)
0:::
(5
o
..c:
Q)o
.olll
og>
;'ii)
L.. :J
co>..
~.o
Q) ~
>~
it::~
CD =1/)
0;::.-
roU)
>.ca
oJ:l
c: CD
Q)'tl
~:!
Ou
c._
0"
0-
I/)
o:C
o c -
.cCGo
~,cQ)
(/) - -
Q)U)lIl
L..U)Q)
'3 .! Co
0"=
Q)coN
o:::c~
': 0 c:
~"'C co
Oal-o
'-"';': c:
- 0.. Cll
cry 0..::::
:Scum
II)
::0
'"
,g ~
~gf
0..",
<(..s:::::
......u
~~
II B
<(2
-- '"
z~
c;:)
...-
-
.....
C
Q)
E
"0.
C l3
Q)'-
En;
ltl"O
C
C :J
ltlo
0..0
E ltl
o~
~ltl
C Q)
og
+:ic:
a.Q)
E 00
Q) 0
x.....
Q) 00
"OQ)
Q)Ol
.....c
~ ltl
.- ..c
EO
,- '-
UiS
'; C
~,2
0"'"
_ltl
M~
.....E
-:.=
;;.-.
.-=: '"
- Ir)
~u 00
"'0
....,
m>:e:
00
..81
1.>15
en Cl)
,~ S
- Cl)
..0 _
6::~
"0
Q)
'e
Q)
"0
Q)
.0 00
>. (};f;.
ltl ltl'-
Eo a.~
-oEa.
ltl .z: ,- ltl
> u..... 0
elR~-
0._ E 8
a. 0 a...c
m...oo
"ECQiOO
Q)CD>..c
EEQ)~
a. l!! "0 ::
O=Q)OO
-lR..cltl
Q)ea-Q)
>CD'-'-
Q)EQ)ltl
"0 >Q)
.... Q) 0
.E -8 :: 'S;
C.- 0 t:...
,2 ! 7: ~
.....U"Ooo
~"~ CIl :J
,- ... 00 0
o..!! :J :J
g.",~ g
oc>-c
z~g8
': "'i" CD 0
MID::......
~=~-g
--C~
~ltlO:C
_~ u U'J
o
.....
-
00
:J
E
,qlr)
- Ir)
,- ,
1.>00
"'0
....,
m>:e:
'00
..81
I.> +"
en ~
Cl)
.~ 6
- Cl)
..0 _
6::~
....
CIl
a.c
.Qo
m:-p
>ltl
CIlOl
-c;e
ltl E
~CIl
"0"0
CIl':;;
00::0
00.....
~ 0-
ltlo
00.....
CIl'"
.oC
oQ)
-E
>- ...
0-
cE
~E
....0
~u-o
c C) c
Occu
~:s E
OCQ)
0-"0
..c.Q CIl
o >-..c
00- .....
-aCio
CIl m.....
::.!!~
,gcu~
<(000
..CIlt
m:; 0
::=::00.
MCIlO
..-x....
_Q)a.
"0
II)
00
"0
II)
~
o
~
...><:
I.>
-<
Ol
C
':;;
,!!!
..c
o
cu
'-
.E
00
c
,Q
a.
o "
cC
00
:z:;..
ltlea
,2> C)
~;
E"e
-gl!!
roea
Gi-;;
E'
:JS
C ea
WC
,,0
~:e
-0
~a.
Me
:Sa.
;;.-.
:=: V)
- Ir)
,- ,
000
"'0
....,
m>:e:
'00
..81
I.> +"
en ~
Cl)
,~ s
- Cl)
..0 _
6::~
Ol
C
'~ ~
.Qltl
0"0 5
~(ij :p
~ ~ '~
Q)::.. 0"'0
..cc>-
...... ::J ~ ro
-oc "0
OE:J c
CIlltlE .!!!
B 00 E ....
,5 ;S 8 .E
"O:!::Q) "E
Q)"Ofi CIl
"OQ)c E
5 ~ 0 ~
...........'U a.
l3~Q) ....
E E ~ 0
=_0. c
OCE 0
~ CIl,- 'in
Ec"Oc
~coc~
._QGit;.!!!x
>ea-Q)
ltl 0 X 0 _
g~CDcg
"0 ltl '- ,2 ,-
CIlgO:;O
~-CD.o2
o:G>J!EUi
C\I:5...cc
~ui~88
->-a.
MltlE
:s::_ . .
"0
u
00
"0
u
~
o
:::
...><:
I.>
-<
ltl
g "0
m"E~"OCIl
.....CIlClijCIl
cuoo.!!!.....oo
~ -Uj a. c: Cii--
"OCOlQ)>
~ 8.5 [CIl
':5cEo~
c-OltlQiI
Q)ooOl>
::C~CIlui
Q) .!!! C -g ,!!!
Ola.O....~
5 ,: ~ "0 '5
_CIlECltl
ofi....ltl~
CCIl.E"EO
0000 C CIl 0.....
,- ltl ,- E ..c C
='OQ)a.~CIl
l"OroooE
-ro..cQ)=~
"0 0 00 > .0 .-
S.o"OQ):J~
CD_C"Oa.Q)
iii 0 ltl --....
"OOCooO....
..c o.~ 00 ltl
C 0._ ~ "0 =
oOOo=Q)E
.- "0 CD 0 Q) ,-
~ c 'O'~ c ~
Q)ltl'--Q)O
(/)-a.o.........
_CcO:J ,
"Q)o..cocu
C"iE+:iO:J(!)
-cmU)I--
.9Gi-:;goo.9
- > a....o ~ -
~oo:;:,c:~
_ Cl a.. 0.._ _
,qlr)
= v;-
1.>00
"'0
....,
m~
00
..81
I.> ......
en ~
II)
.~ s
- Cl)
..0 _
6::~
...
C
CD
E '
.....a.>-
00 0 U
:J _ C
EQ)CD
> '-
00 Q) '-
-"0=
5:i- U
E.- C
C C) 8
.....C
Q).- -
>.5 g
OE.z:
C>,-u
roSin
OCD.z:
O-c...
.....J "-
""':"O~
ea-Q)
. CD u
!:::..'-C
m=ea
-'1:1 =
-Q)a.
MUE
~o
>-..0
_ a. U
;E.5
E'-CD
.. .2 ..
0.- 1lI
!:.SlR
.: ltl g
It!..c~
CDooea
-,- U
Ol:O _
~19a..
.....ooa.
_CIlea
-<
Z
~
Q)
t;.
ro..c
g~
-::
"0.....
CIlC
::Q)
oE
=CIl
ltlQ)
- ....
ltlc>
:5ltl
Q)ro
OlO
ltl 0
:JL:
OlQ)
c.....
ltl,5
:t;c
Q)ltl
... "0
Q)c
-CIl
Q)a.
Coo
.... :J
ceil/)
-.....
So
-CIl
M-
....m
-c
~'E
'- ....
CD Q) ,
s:-'E
;:ocu
0- 0
u.."E.o
.....Q)o
,..:EO
-c..c
Ol....O
-Q)OO
M>Q)
,,-O..c
_C>.....
<t:
Z
>-
u_
co
Q)C.....
l: "0 C
= - Q)
u :;:, E
coo.
0{ii.Q
u..... Q)
_c>
OCIlQ)
OE"O
..cccu
uGi.....
lR > 0
rooro
..c C> ,-
....._ C
_ltlQ)
00"0
~.Q....
Q)ltlo
..c >- ro
1-.0>
-"0 0
cQ)c..
0-0.
(;jccu
.- Q)
>Ec
o Q) ltl
.. - ....
a.a.Q)
IOEfi
0'- .-
ocCIl
N(J)'-
Q).E
~.ooo
Q) ...... .-
ZCIlOO
_ >-ltl
........~
:2gQ)~
::=::oo:5E
MltlQ)Gi
~.c..o
m
Q)
::D
III
~ ~
o.bO
o..C
<t:~
-u
~c
II B
::l
~~
Zoo
o c:
c: ,9
::l ~ tii
o"'Ot::
U Q) 0
'5 ~ f;}
.D5ic:o
"'O".rn e .C
Q)Q)E-<1;i
011"'0 _ '-
"'O....~Cl
..2g-g
~ <Il s::
o ~,==
]..=-=
u ::l
-( ;:;;
Q)
,2 ro
"~Q)u
II) Q),C 0
C:;l/)-E Q)
._~"'C:w en
,:::oC::Sl/)ro
.! m ro ~ :.c -9
o >c ,-0::
c~Q)~Q)<(
Oc:EOQ)LU
;ooEllEQ)
ast)Q)E-=
~ ro > ,- l/).....
0a.0Q):J0
c..EC)l/)EQ)
~ .- Iii ~ It) E
asQ)o_e:,w
...,CoQ)eQ)
....---N,C
l/)Q)ro__......
asl/),CC)..... l/)
u:g-o-:.:e>.iii..!!!
Ol/)UE::i""l/)
Eroc: ....,03
..05.2ocoo
-......,.IIto-...........Oo
~uQ)Q)....eo
..:: Q)....'c ON....
~ ro Q)';:: _ Q)
C) :J l/) C) a...- >
,~l/)_ 0'0 >.Q)
o..g~-Q)3-fi
o 0 a.-C~""':C:
UQlEo=>.~
ro .c ,- 3;.c.c ::>
.9U;~1i)jgc"E
5:Jl/)::J~Q)Ql
';::E'EEl/)EE
Q.J-lUl-t)~U
;..:..0 -g 0 E '5 ~
~ 0 19 0 .~ g E
_U-l/)U-u....ro
C
Gl
E
Q)
ill
c:
o
:a;
1:::
o
a.
l/)
C
ro
~
~
Ql
~
"'0
Q)
OIl
"'0
Q)
~
o
c:
~
u
-(
-(
Z
~
Ql
~
..r-
oo
.....
C")
C")
co
.....
>.
.c Q)
,0 .....
c.....c 0
oiiro >.
u_c: rou 0
roeDU Uffil/),CC:
.21V5 2Qlcg~
~ sm g-iii Q)oo g
c.-u u(;jE ,....
Q) ~ 0 ro '0 >......
EoE ~CmQl
ED.oro ~as~-g=
,C_ C
Ql...a. _...ro::Jo
>c..o ccco
oOla; Q)::SlU.cc
~.~ ij) E .8 a. ~ ,Q
~ m '0 C '- .- ro
OQ)- Q)~.E~~
- l/) .- > .- ~ Q) E
ul/)3; oi:=Ci)l/)=
~rol- C)eD-CQl
'550 liill)~jg=
e-- 0 0 c ,- '-
QlUu- ..QasE::JE
o::.,g. ::-e~~.g
..............11) -:2(/,)-......
CQ)C C ,- a.
oEo Ou~'~E
.- - -.-C::>,C
c:; ro Q.:g c:; ro ,~ ~ ~
eDU)OeCDcij)3;Ql .
II)OCNII)O,->. ~
11)00 -1I)"i>.1:::Ec
oN._.....o_ 0 Q) lU Ql
c ~1V'-c>ca.l/)E
N:.~~N~&ecu
~ eD~ E ~.c ro a.Q) ~
~'OEE~~::JIii~~E
- CDQl-Ec:;::;cro
;..:.. 3 :a 0 ;..:.. E ,Q ~ Ql C
co CD .c t- 0 C)_ E ro
:::'0 1I).c :::. u e'iii ro a.
o
It)
"'0
Q)
OIl
"'0
Q)
~
o
s:::
~
u
-(
-(
z
c
l/) ro
C ,- .c
ro3;'-
.oQl:J
,-,- Q)
::J>L:
cE-Q)
ro >.,~ =
-gg€E
i5.Ql3;e
o C) >.-
U~1:::o..,
roroQlEl/)
~gg-Q)c
,- .... x Q)
L:C)a.Q)E
~eC)Q)U
= c'-c
roU:;:::roQ)
a.Co E
'0 ro Ql ~
,- Q):t:: c: ro
5iiiroQ)c
E-l/)l/)Ero
cUa.
lUaiQl~-
::~EEo
-roUro~
gC~L:C
..QlEO~
~Ero~e-
1I)0a.c: ,E
ro >.-
II)Qj-'-Gl
o>Q.roL:
OQ)....u_
Nu.25c
~~-goo
CDU_.og
Z C lU Q) ,_
':-:' ro .~ ,2 iii
co== E ~ ~
..-'i::=Q)E
_,_ Q) l/) =
....
o
s::
<Il
<Il
Q)Q.,
g;:;;
6.0
= .5
s]
~ .~
Q)....
s c:
~ 8
Q.,
~
o
t-
oo
.....
C")
C")
co
.....
E
'-0
l/)Ql....
'-'0-
=~C:a.
as 'iij:::> E
Ec 'Ql
II) Ql ~ X
asug,Ql
l/)UQl~
ro:giiiro
Q)o 0 II)
~ g-Q)~
....l/)C
'0 a.::J ::J
CQlUC)
..!!!L:CC
-- (0.-
ro - II)
:;::;CQl::S
c~....o
Q)3;2.c
:2_2 CD
~ c C)-
'-CDc.o
-E:;::;~
ou,~ ...
(ijc:xo
>CDQl:t:
eE~as_
a.as-l/)
a._ c Ql
roC:roO
uCD,CC
QlE-!9
3:c..l/)l/)
..Qo~Ec::
<( "'i ~ ~ ,Q
': ~ o,:::ffi
-= u 0 0 ,-
~ CD ~ ,s E
o_roro=
x~ g.i,~
SfI)Q)O=
.....
It)
.....
~
Q)
z
c:
...
cCD
Q)u
E g
a.u
.Qu
~E
Q)o
Uc
Ql 0
-u
~ CD
l/)_
....Las
-u
ro._
E~
l/) ti
Gl_
=0
_as
-CD
-...
c: as
0_
.in 1!
"> 2
o
... ro '
D.l/)~
U)Ql=
o>a.
0- a.
Ngro
:::.C~
::>'- E
CD C ,-
~Qla;
" E '-
"":'00
-c'P
OQle
XEN
Scam
e
..-
~
Z
~
Ql
~
.....
(j)
.....
C")
C")
co
.....
'0.2
:g'E ro
... ro ....
asC) Ql
- e . L:
CIS......f/)~
... ::J C Q)
20QlQ)
lU=E>
o '~ -g ~
::::UQlo
~ ~ E C
EOlUo
'0 a.CU
C a...!!! -
Q)ro ~
EQlQl-
ro .0 ,~ ~
c>.l/)c
<(roCQl
-E~ E
gc:~E
.in :; E ~
>gog,
000_
"'UClU
c.. 00
U).~_.Q
g E'Eu
N 0 ,- Q)
~ g - '5
CDUOe-
ZCD::;Ql
-__0:::
" as lU "
"-"u"""-
0._ l/) ~
::=:::: (I) ::=::
:::.u=~
Q)
:0
<0
,~ ~
c.~
0..<0
-<..c
.....u
~c
II .8
-<2
-..,$
Ze/:J
N
It)
.....
......
......
.... ei:
Q)
- -0
m
:5:c- c::
m "'0
Q)~ 0 "'0 fI)
:0- fI) OIl
N_ Oll
me: -0 "'0 ~
....Q) -0 ...... II) ~
o E Q)-o ~
a..Q) 0
"""w Olc:: 0 s::
~m ~ ~
Q) , (.) (.)
>.0 ~ <: <:
.- ::l
0(1)
Q) e:
E ~
0
0 <(
<: <: <: <:
-- -- --
Z z z z
B
. Q)
-s:::.
c::_
Q)....e:
E Q).-
Ql ~ m
Qi Q)'i::
ell s:::. Q)
Ql:='E
:E1::0
1305
m Q..-
......&(i
O~E
0- Q)
s:::.IlIX
O.!! Q)
eIllllQ)
0'"
.- Q.s:::.
:a c.::::
2tc(~
m -g E
....IlIO
o _
c5e1l
Ql.- Ql
E - :J
III e:
Ql::2:;:;
Ql - c::
.... III 0
Ol>o
mW.....
m Ql c:: .
os:::.(I)N'
o""E......
1::.~ E f::'
-SQ)Q)r--
e:e:>......
'-.- OM
OEOl.
O...._M
s:::.-Sm<o
0Q)0---:
ell -0 ..Q ell
0) '0 t)
c::c::l
Q).- t'G E
.!: ~ c 1::
EC~8.
-S~t'GQ)
Ql'- ~ a:::
-0 .!: Ql Ql ~
OO-Sws:::.s:::.
::J......c-".......
EUlOciC:: .
UlUeIlQlc::
1:: ~ ol=:{ E .!!!
o O.!: E~
g.~-g-o~o
o:::e:ofijo:=
ii ~.!: E~~
.!! .0 S ~ ~ 8:
f~u-o..Q:::I
Q.s:::..!.-S Q) ~
Q......O os:::. Q)
c(c::...Q)..........
Ql Q..(5' s:::. m
'0 E >-.... .~ :=
ce:-o.s:::.....
III Q; g;q; := m
5~::2QlO~
.-_wE.....o'
- ""'... Q)
Ill-CD 0 Q)"-
..: ~ ... ..... c>>.!!J
III 0 III -0 Q) .-
>-:;tQl-o-o
WQlCD~Q)-S
Ql~>Qls:::.c::
.J::L....C+JQ)
1--Q)t'G'~E
~:5E::;:;Q)
;:::"QlCD::2~o..
~~ ~ l!:E.~
~
Ql
Z
c
o
ii;;
.!! ~ -0
fOQ)
Q.Q.a;
Q.WQ)
c(c....
III 0
'o'-Ul
e: I-- m
1lI- :=
e:~:::
.2 Os:::.
1;; E.~
::2-s:::.
-==3:
III ::2 ....
>:E 0
W -
Q)~Q)
s:::.mell
1--....8.
- Q) ....
C s:::. :J
0-0.
Ui~Q)
.:; := :5
OQ)-o
... - Q)
Q.m>
:JQ)
II) iU .-
o:>..r:::
~Q)~
:;t iii ell
CD ::l m
zE..r:::
-:-:-1::'0
- O'C
.9.. Q. ';
N' CD._
_~o
~
Q)
~
III
.!!
III
...
C.
Q.
c( C
-go
Ill.:!
e: u
o III
.- Q.
1;;E
::2-
- ...
III 0
>....
w>-
QlC)
..r:::o
1---
o
-'0
50
'CiS.
._ CD W
> E'!!!
2 ==
... eIl._
-IIlU
1I)Q)1lI
OUl....
OUlC
NmO
:;too;;
CD ::l III
zE1::
-:-:- 1:: 8-
-Ow
.eQ.C
-CD III
~D::'::'
~
Q)
~
<0
'<T
N
M
M
<0
......
~
Q)
~~
Ql .
ZN
~-
_ ol
MX
LO C') <0
N ~~
<0 <0 r--
...... ............
M M M
M M M
<0 <0 <0
...... ..-......
~
;g
......
......
t::'
r--
......
M
M
<0
......
....
0;
co
~
co
o
o
N
.c
o
.n
II)
N
.
- . ~ :5 Q) '0
;; 0 ~ E ~ ou. '~..r::: -0 j
E COQl eIlQl.....
'0 ~ ~ ::2 ~ ..r::: .c. -J c ~ E c ~ ii
;;~; ~16i ~_:g ~~,g~ ~2
Eu.2 00. Nt'GN c::Ul.....-o ~m
llI.m u~~ 10:;<6 ....-Ec:: 0
__CD..... _......... ~ _0 Ql> me: Q) 0:5
CD U c.. <(. CD u.:3 co:; 0 0 0 ~ E Ql .~
.A >- ::l .- C::::l 0 U N U. ol:;:; Q) m .0
- 0.... 0_ 'o-m c:: c::
~ U ~ 0 :e:C:if N. = ~ -J mo ~ .~ m B .Q
'cc:: CDj.... .clll'"" .00.....0.. ma;
1:: EQl 0 ~ U Ul'~ 0.. 0 (I)' :g - ~ ~ - ~ -S
o .-m_3: -- .N~""'EO mo.
c.'O := B ell a::: Q) 0 Ul u. <6 .- 0.-0:>' ol 00. .
CD C ,- m 0 .- ~ ~ . 0 ol 0 e: 0 c:: u.
~ CD == ~ 1::"0 ii> MOm -0 Ql e: '> Q; 0
ii 5 :g ~ 8. 5l Ill.... ~ ~ M N :J ~ E ~ .m a; -J
W'VCDE Q)'<T 8-mc- OQl -
-QlQ. QlOUl gOo<o..r:::e:-e:Ql Ql....O
III - .0 Q) a. Q) ':.... ...... 0 Q) e: 0 _ ..... 0) N
a.g'.!: ~U: ec .c o.M Ql:;:; Qlu."O....~
Q..- Ul Q) ol a. :J 0 c M cD -a E a.s:::. 0 Ql 0 <0
c( lIts.o c:: oluJ '" Q)<O 1; ~.!!.g~-J ~ m8
'0 III Ul iii iii:s. ~... E""" u ol Ql moo a. Ql N
C C Ql :J e: o.u.". -0 u) C ~ C ..r::: c:: N e ?"..c.
1lI:2 ~ E .Q> E <<:i ~ ~.!: Ql m Ql 0 0 ~ a. 1.0 ()
C:!::oe:eIlQlQ)xO ON E"OQ) o.E~~<omN ~
.2:;t:>.m-oQlo. f:= ~O_Q).,D
... 0 - co'. m e: ::2 Ql & iIi 'E- 0 O..r::: III ~ '"
III '0 ell c:: e: M c.c c:: i;:: ::: e: \'lI Q) N..... ..... Ql._ q)
2 ~:c (I)> g g u) (I)~ ~ ~ :J Ul C :~ ~..c. ~ g>; ]. gp
III -......- 0 0 ..... E ..0;. a. Ul .2 -0 III - m () := :;:; ...... ro
afj .g.!: ~ :g :g ~ Ect :3 m ... -0 E 8. Ql Ql 0 - -< ..c
QlIll€~3:3:C::~~s:::.W~<(iiQ)~u)~~~~U
..r:::Ql::'Q)QlQ)::lOO.Ul_CD> ell .._UlQle:.........,oZ ~
1--.0 > ::. 0 Q) N W :J o..Q Ul a. '- 0
..... .... Z Z > N:O III .!: Ci 1lI0 Q; Ql ..... 3: e: ~ II t:
~ t) g- E - -.~ iU .... m u _ _ ..... 0 0 0 Q) =: .... .;:::
o:J"Ooo""">o~OOe:Ql-Um~-o=..r:::=~ro
:::::. E m 0:::::':::::' ~..Q S. w CD 0 ~ m :=..::; m <( := W Z lZi
~
Ql
~
M
1.0
co
o
g
r--
1.0
......
'<T
1.0
1.0
1.0
..-
<0
1.0
o
-L...
~.2
-oQ)
C E
Q) lU
E.:::
lUQ)
~.!; (/)
Q) - C
Q)Q)O
eN:;::;
W'e ~
~ g> 0
00 ~ ~
L... Q)
~
<
:::r::
:::r::
u
....
..E
'"
Cl)
""
'S;
o
....
0..
;;s
;:;
....J
~
;..'
y.D
._ ::s
om
~ ....
Cl)
.5 ~ j:;
.,eCl)Cl)
.<;:: m E
~ C~
""o:l~
tS.-:::
-.::I a
:9~
> 0
o
....
~
~
Cl)
'E
Cl)
>
o
~
;:;
....J
~
~
Cl)
'E
Cl)
>
o
~
;:;
....J
~
-.::I
Cl)
00
""
Cl)
~
o
s:::
..:.::
y
<
<
z
~
-0
C
CIJ
~
~
Q)
~
~
Q)
~
:0-
-
0)
co
,....
......
('I')
cr:i
co
~
N
co
,....
......
('I')
('I')
co
......
-
:3-
N
co
I"-
......
('I')
('I')
co
......
~
N
co
,....
......
('I')
cr:i
(0
......
~
0)
co
,....
......
('I')
('I')
(0
......
-
......
-
......
,....
,....
......
('I')
('I')
(0
Cl)
a~
~;;s
go
s::: Cl)
O.,e
y ....
",,,-,
'" 0
Cl) Cl)
y-.::l
e--
0...eJ
;: S
Cl
~
N
o
00
......
('I')
cr:i
co
......
Q) Q)..... Q...... Ol
~ 5 (/) 5~ ftIooo -5
Q) ~ _:I: ~ 5 ~ ~~. I ~ ~ g! :E.Q g Ol >. 0 I
E ~ ftI:I: L... .'- ;j L... L... ..r::: '0 0 0 Ol CD ~ N E .a ..... (0
~= j ~~~~~~(j)~~~ ~~~; ~~~ ~~ ~~
.- u ..r::: 0) ftI E.....J C. -- .... 0 - E(/)o ;j o..r::: 'tJ ~ >. 0 ~ iU.
~u~ Q)CD fowE~o.....J~~~ ~o-o C 3 Z.... ~..r:::
~~~ 5~ ~00~81~~lU5~ ~~~~ j~~ i~ ~o
.a C - CD 'tJ ...... (0 0 'm 0.. L... '- CD ...... ..r::: "0 CD C .a E CIJ ~ -ci
lij ~ "* 5i ~ ~ :a ~ g ~ Q. ~ .g .E ~ .~ .!:! C .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD (/)E -;:g
(/)(/)- E'tJONONc-ClJroCo ~CIJ (/) _- ~ ClJo
CIJ (/) (/) Q) Q......J ftI 01 . Q) u E 0 l'll tT ~ iU = :J Q) :) :J Q) x
'(/)~5 C):J -:I:1!lo~Ef lij~>~ ::::..r:::~ .IL."OLi tT~ ~Ol
c"Oo ~~~~ro C~~_;jOlo _1!l=00~~2Ol e(/)~x""o
o"O(/) ......0)0..... ~'0Q)~ OCIJCOlOOlO -0('1')
(/)l'llc roc~-Q)~g!cl'll~roc_ _Q)Q)_ ~~5 ~l'll ~_
....OlO~~~o:I:..r:::-ooftl~c>ClJOl CDL...Eo.....J- C u(/).....J~Ol
8..a ~ 0 [) iU ~ ii :: 0 01 Q.:I: :s :.g ~ ~ ~ C C W -g .9 0 i &. N (0 ~
Q) 1: Ol.....J C (ij . (;) 0 E n; Q):I:.!: C :J..r::: - C ~ Ul lli> Ol c <( t .~ ~ ~ _
EClC.~Q)C...r:::ftICIO~OCIJCIJ..r:::- ftI.....~~(OECDI :J"O~g~
o 'E -5 (0 e> ~ 0 0 g en .Q ~ CD E.g .... ~ 01 0 01 _ g CIJ E I g "0 8 ('I') E
gUl~~Q)e.~OlUOCIJOl;>.:J~~ E~n;~N.9~O olijo~_
" "0 0 E Ol c Q) ii).....J Cl..r::: E .a ~ ..r::: ~ (/) - 0 _ . (/) CD Ol U ....... N 0 a:::
~Q)(/)Q)oNW5ft15-Olen~~oUl>.~l'll =~Ol'llO~~-..r::: ~c~-O
oOl ..... -_ Q)>c. Q)_ l/) .a:J-- -c- CDOl~-
I C .!: ~ 0 g> 0 Ol ~ ~ E':: E c...... - 2 U >'0) . OlE CD u ~ EO::=:: Ol
>. Cl-Q) ~ -.- c ~ - - .- ;j l'll l'll l/) - C -00 E .- ... _ ~ Ul
- 0 - L... C - - 0 ~- 0 ~ 'W l'llOO 0 C C. - l'll . .-, ;j
Ol~"O ~;j~~>.al'llOftlcoCl- Q)>L...l"-o....CDOl IIlOl5~~
E Ul "0 (j)' .~ ~ ~ ~ 15"O C Ul ~ .O,.!. .!: C C CD 0...... N g!~"O .~.::. n; ~ 3
~ ~ ~ "~ Ol :J ~ Qi Ol :8 ~ ftI iii 9 .!: ,g :8 ~ - ~ - 0 c .9 ~ ftI Ol Q) 8 E
x~IIl~C-UWD~oro0J~~lU omE~......Clm"OO~Cl~o.lU
Q) OlOftl"O (/)Q)~cOOCCl .Q)Uo...... -E .....JClU_
· ~=OO~>'>OlCIJ=(/)-Ol'll ~~~l/)-_~3lU C ftI~OOOl/)
UlOC -~CD..r:::~~~~~>OE'E-O~tl/)Ul~giiCIJOOIllOl-~E
Ol..r::::J~O=CD-ClJ_Q)OlftlOl_ .....JQ):J~c -_~lli>OlUlCUlro.
~~O)g-aUlC(/)Q)(/)OlCEb~-o~ClooC~>.-.al/)~_(O..r:::Q)Q)E(/)"O~
C C (/) ftIQ)~ c-...........c L...(/) Ol'''~O-- Q)CO
01 l/) = ~ C C U 01 - Ul CIJ ~ CD l'll lU -'- lli> CIJ -'=' 0 (/) Ol .= O:I: 0 l/) 'ii) t 01 CIJ .....J
oc.-o~o~COll'llUl-U~"OE~co(/)cO)Q)~~UON~CClJCoo
~e;~~~~~.a~~&5~2Beg~s~e~g-gOl~g~Ol~Ol~
a:::Cl'tJm<(~..r:::0.9=<(~u~enl/)e.N<(UOe.(/)a:::l'll50<(.a005N
00
~
......
0)
~
......
o
(0
......
N
(0
......
......
(0
......
('I')
(0
......
~
(0
......
'" Cl)
"'..c
Cl)....
y,-
e 0
Q.,Cl)
....""
c.;;
Cl)_~
Es;;S
-.::I Cl) r"
~a'-'
~~
~ e
:::;E'C
o 8
IV
-
-
N
......
o
00
......
('I')
cr:i
(0
......
-
o
C
o
E
C
;;:::
Ol
"0
Q)
5
-
o
t
CIJ
C. .
l/)~
lUO
_.....J
C _
OlO)
Eco
Ol ,
Ol(O
....0
010
ClJN
Q)~
~O
-0 ,.j
Q)C
-oOl
cE
1!l-o
x C
Ol cu
-E
ol'll
~~
~CIJ
~~
.:i~
~~
~
(0
......
.a
>."0
:!:::Q)
_:=l/)
cCIJ.aUl
OC~~
.- 0 lU-po
'5 ~ c.-t5
,Q~El'll
L...oO_
00-00
.- l/) C
"Oc'tJ
-OCl/)
~~roE
E lY .~ {g
ol/)OlC
~-g'ElY
w(/)O(/)
...:
......
~
-
......
r::-
oo
......
('I')
cr:i
(0
......
~
Q)
~
00
o
N
('I')
('I')
(0
......
N
......
a)
J3
~ '"
.- Q)
-eo
Q..s:::
c.o:j
<..c
aU
zc
II .8
<:;..3
....... o:j
Zti5
~.!: 0
15 (/)'g
-- c:_
"'Ol/)
ro._._
e.- ..r:::
ElYL...
0(/)0
o.ac
c ::l 0
om~~
.- ;j'- l'll
'S-oE~
J::lCOlOl
E.!!:! c. ~
.!! 01.9 8
'g.!: l/) .
o(/)-C
.;: :g 5i.Q
oL...EiU
.!!:gE~
CDClJOlOl
OCIJ>l/)
... -c 0 ~
"OQ)Cl
Ol~n;'"
iUooQ)
Qil/).Qo
.... Q) l/) x
C:~Q)Q)
,g ~ '5 ~
~ lY g'e
l/) (/) .... 0
~~U;Q)
:g~5ro
l'll o~ 0
l/);::lY~
Olftll/):)
......."C-J
13B~LL
oio~
(0
co
......
,....
(0
......
W
!I! -0 ~
.g~~
(l)c:o
00
e.iij~
a.W.c
.g'E.g>
-Wc:
C:C:O
~!!!~
.iij- ::J
ll...5 :g
:2Ein
,,~'C
'"
c..8c..
~~~
Cl8C1
I '" lI>
"O~.s
lI>U,,-<
0000
"E E.. lI>
-_"0
~ 1::.-
o lI> J!l
I:: E :3
~"Oo
U I': lI>
<lI>a
E
~
s::
... 0 .
<E 0.. ~
:3 U
lI> '" s::
:g.2 S
> - '"
e e.s
0.. s::- ..=
-0-
0._ 0
I':t).o
'" lI> ...
lI>"'<E
.gs'"
p...,:: ~
~'2 1a
o~ii5
"0
'" lI> ~ gj
"'''=_000
2L::: ~ s:: I::
eo", .8 'gj
~~ ~ 00
c -v; ",c -;; ...c::
~~~~~
.g 0 >. "0 {l
I:: lI>::: ... "0
lI>aa<Ea
~~oU)tt=
t<l 00 lI> ~
e;;::~~....
"""s~i:;..s
OUClE..
~
(I)
~
0>
0
N
M ~
("j ~
co (I) (I)
.,.... z z
CU~~~ _ Ol g cu ._~ (ij
:: W c:.o 00 0 <i" . . .0 UJ 0 .r:. Ol
-o~cum~ c: co EOl ~.oOl ~-o
(I) cu - W I E:g 0 g ca a. 0 >.- (I);:
W-OOlCO Ol;:N ~W_ .o~w-~ 00
::JWc:_o 0__ OCUCU oW _
OlOlo.oo ~C:O' .r:. CDc:-o u::
CUN -CD.c ....W_ >(1).... ~
.ow~c: cCU_U ~Ol- ~-O~~W~-~OC~
OE~o~ (l)ECD _.cc: - I~ CDO
;~.QmU Ec:-O>. .2lQ(I)E liCUCU~'iij(l).gUJE-'
-o~ (I) c:o(l)ca~.c (,)~~cE=m~a..
....C:(I),-~ ""(I)~.r:.W~, m-O ~O->Ol cao~
m .!!l = - c: > .!!l = ~ Co in ~ >>= 0 EWE c ...J - a
~w~~.Q oOl.oo ;wE _<....-omo(l)~~~
.!!l-5-c::g c>C>CU~ ca.m 'in a.c:W~EOCDt-
w::Jw(I)w m~in~ >t-c: cooo(l)m~~~~g
>.wc:o.o o-Ol~ ONm CDN-E-oE(I)~~N
- O-::J omc:.... Cc:~ -oc:cm2OlE-
~.o=i~~w >m ~ (I) -c.
-c:'- io ~ E.Q>..coQEc:~xm~ca8
~ .r:. 0 (I) 0 ~ Ci.5 = C) U c: U _ U c: J!! -0 Ol c: .0
mW= - c'a.= cOlm(l)~Ol....a.mwm~""
~~~E~ ~~~j 1:~~~:~~~i:I~1
8~o~~ ~~~~ OowE-oOC> >'Eo~c:_
w_~oc: (1)--.0 ~-'~m-o-'m~mE-o ~oc:
Olo>C>m CioE'i: CD .O'-C .(,)~ c: 0'-(1)
.cc:~~-w '-E- 00>0 caO>oa.-(I)Ol~~E
W > - c: _0 ..... .!! .... co '- 0 - co - c: 0 .5 ~
-w(I)o"" Q-z-o o~a.'-C)~m.gOlE::Jo~~
~~"".Q~ uE'--o -ac: caomEm(l)N-o_Ol
.!!l_~w::J (1)....0 ~ooo.a-w-o.r:.~~(I)>
~~;~O'O(l) w~~; g~R=~~-o!l!ffig(l)o.r:.Ol
. - E 0 = ;-; (Q 02 c: ;> ..c: 0 cu ~ ..c: ~"3 E fJ) i5 - -;; ~
~c:-mi ~~2.2 ~Uiw uc:um~c:~~~
2 ~ ~ ~f ~ m - a.:: '2: ~-o c ~ ~.g ~ -5 ffi 0 ';' m ~
~o::J:;::;-O wg>(I)-E :::J"02OlEca"O"OCi::JE~~~5
Lc>-om~ Ol-Ol EOl- -OOlC:C:W-O-
W(I)~(I)-w- .~.=;::'" .E-"OOlOl.........cu.iii..c:i\i2WE
'u 0 u. 'u::J C U. m - 0 m - -0 Ol - ... - E
~ (,) e -g ~ 0 ~ u ~ ca 0 0 ~ ~ E := ~ .... 6 c: E .EJ:: co 0
a..Q a. W m -' U ~ m .::. -' 0 (,) Ol._ <( 0 ~ .c l!! m = .0 ~ 0
~
00 0> 0 0
co co t- 0
"f"'"" ~ ,..- N
M
.,....
W _ .
o o.=i
c>oOl (j)Jl!-
.5 .r:. = > Ol ~
~~>. ~ro~
.... .o.c-C:
J!! -g -0 0 m o.~
Om (I)::J=t-o
>. c:.5 W c: 0 Ol
? .Q .!!l (ij .Q g- ~
.>> i\i.5 ~.~ Ci W
~ -e m > .-
=oE(ije(l) ~
a g-'O:; a.= ~
::c:c:oOl::u.
CD!!!m:e=-o,,-::
~--o m .(I)CO
-....(I)a.c:c:..-
.!! ~ a; m .Q 'iij ......
g ~:.c .5 :g :5 ~
ca=o "OmCU
c:om::mE_
'-'-(I)C: N
~m,-(I).5Ol"-
-(I)m> .00
O-w(I)-6-oo
c: >. -0 -0 Ol g ..-
2'iij(ij.ga; ~
.- .- -0 (I) .- "0 M
.5 g c: a. -5 ~ co
~mSc>mc~~
"0 .5 W c: ..... W W 0
(I) '; ~p= g 'E .5 -'
= .-.- ~ (I) m W ~
wc:2:_",,"Owa
(l)m(l)a.mC:(I)N
.~ Q. ~ (I) W J!! g .
> (l)o.c'OlIl""at-
(I) -""Ola.
~=(j)omo(l)a
> 'O.-....N
Ni\i~-o~2:m~
~=::ffiinm~u
G)
:D
~ tIl
:.=~
g:a
<(.s:::
oU
zC
II B
<(.a
___ t':l
zVi
..-
t-
..-
.....
co
0)
..... :>.
coou',
O)g......
c.- L-
.- ro 0
~t::o
0......
-gg-co
.S: C 0)
E CO (/)
L....bas
.!!lEo
O)......e
. -0 0) .2
(/)~..c
.- 0) ~
>- C .
== ..Q .s:_ ll..
.__......0
..cOc....!
.(0)0) -
ra(/)E~
CD co 0)0
- 0 O)~
-O)cor-
.!!.eco
C)...... coo
:; .s: E ~
C ...... :>..e
it: 5}go
iii~~.-:.
.e0)""'(/)
...._::::JQ.)
rg-og=a.
1;::.2 0 a.
.;:: (j) 0 co
J!! a. (5 -0
0.....00
............ ro ..c: .C
NO)OO)
_:>.(/)a.
<:
Z
~
CI
C
ra
..
I
CI
C
.2
'0
C
ra
Do
i=.
1I)ll..
- 0
O....!
Do -
::i:~
0)......
.e'
......r-
00
......0
cN
o .
._ .e
mO
-
'0 .
0) C
.e.!!!
-0.
IIIC
:go
'S;: :0:;
0) ra
0::1::
.0
coo.
-.
~c
- ra
(")..
--
B
-0"
Q)......
'Em(j)
Q)R.o
E:JE_
Q)II)O)c
>'C0Q)
EO)O)E.....
a.Q)o-o C
ECQ)cO)
--.eQ)E
rolij:::El!?
~ E ~ co'5
g- 0) li= W 0-
oiiJl!?ul!?
Ci"g
0) co
3coO)
a18m
.eN(/)u.:
o -'EO
00......0),
....."'" --'
coO)E.
O).o-o~
>-Eco
'QlQl~
QloEr-
.~ Ql co 0
ll..OOO
Ql:>.cN
=.0 -.c
0-0-00
...... .!!l 5l .
.!!l E'~-o
~.oE~
a.::J.~ 0
::J(/)Ql-o
-Ql_CO
~ .0 ~ .~
~B.~ .!!l
coJ!l5CO
~lij~X
(/)E...:~
~Q)Q).e
.- >4=::......
5-e~;;
O)a......c
o::EO):J
.=5-0
~~ >. Q)
.0 .- L: ~
_a.coo
-COQl-
eo :>. ro
<:
Z
Q)
5
:>. .~
~fti"Orn
o:!::Ql:J
co.cc
_ m'm C
(/)CJ_co
:JQll!?Ql
E .e -5
......-Ql
C 0 o.~
O)_cO)
E O).~ 0
t:: ro 0. J!!
~ -0 E a.u.:
Ql g-8~0
orocco....!_
0) :J .- ::: ~
5co(/)0
_Cc:JN
coco-oE~
5ccco
_co:Joo
lij~.E:;::.N
E g .~ .~ t5
Ql'(ij - ~
.: (/) Co .
:J .- ~ C-
gEEEro-g
""'o.!!.eCi
Ql,~~-o
.1::""",--0
-c.,.c:co
(/)ocO)......
.!!l:;:::;~Eo
..!!:!~el!?c
Ql 7i) CD'5.~
o -- > 0- 0)
u.s: ~ l!? m
_E o.Ql-o
€~ .5 5 g-
~
z
~
0)
~
~
CD ~~~
c:a co 0) -e .S: ....!
CO"; ..... ...... .S: ::J C
:>.raoco.e(/) cco~
.o.!::=~ ~ co-e~
-o>-O)'E~u c:J I
5l = 'E Ql C -0 '- c b
'S;:.!! 0 E Ql co -0 0 0
Q)(J......CD-......5.!;N
..... C C Ql'~ c.:;: co co .
(/)ra 0)..... (/)0):> ON.e
cocEO)cE-..Q~o
._a.cooQlc ~
c- 0 0)0 Ql2.~'s;: .
J!! .~ a; .S: C o,.~ :>. 0) ~
a. a. > -0 .2 co (/) t:: ..... .....
~COQl.S:mO)g~cco
.- E -O..Q 0) COo ~ 0)
~ Ql co ..... E :0 C ..... B .2
O)(/)coEcoa.c~
.e :J'- - .- :;:::; 0) ~ 0)
Q) coO).oco.eO(/)
.....-00 co..... co 0)--0
a. c .- a. co .- -0 c
Eco~E.eN~C""'CO
oo;"g=(/)-Ecolij-e
o.....oco.!!lOO) -E:J
co2og~ :cu0a.o
ro .2 ~'e>>.2 00 ~ ll.. ..Q -
.e Ql ...... Ql t:: u.: ~ ..-::. Ql> cQl
...... .r. '-""..... 0 "- ......
(/)- >..... a...-:.lIl:::::<I) E
0) 0.0 0 o N..... CO-O a.
:2:::"Oca.~..!:S~.Q
>cO)Ql ocoocO)
eQlt::Ergcogcoco>
a.. E &.a.(/)M:eM-e~
-"g a...Q rg MOM ::J l!?
0) 0) :J Ql ..... co a. co -=-
XE(/)~-o......o......ii::-o
e co .~ -0 -g u) c.. u).s: ~
N
r-
'E
CLI
E
CLI
~ I::
I:l/)CLI
I:: E
._ <1)
:!:I.=
o ;::l
::eg'
'- ....
o ....
_<8
- '"
<1)
>."0
0'-
.- >
- 0
o ....
p...p"
C
Ql--
.....co
:Jt::
(/)0)
co
Ql C
0'-
_.e
-
J!l'~
lijCl
E.:
Ql(/)
.= :s
::JO
o-.c
l!?CD
_CJ
C"
Ql,2
E.:.::
0)"
-0
~~ .
cQlll..
'(ij:OO
:JCO....!
0-0 -
.e""'CO
Qlg ~
.e co ,
...........r-
(/)00
(1)-0
(/){/)N
'S;: 0) .
O)~.e
o::{/)O
. 0) u)
~roQl
~:J;
co-c
-O):J
--0 0
~coo
~
......
'E
CLI
E
<1)
~'E
1:l/)<1)
s:: E
._ CLI
'" ....
;::l .-
o ;::l
::eg'
'- ....
o ....
_<8
- '"
CLI
>."0
0'-
.- >
- 0
o ....
p...p"
~
0)
~
0)
C
.;:: co
:J(/)
(/)0)
C-o
Ql .-
..... >
00
- .....
ca.
co-o
o.~u.:
cocoa
Cio....!
00 -
-oNCO
co _0>
...... ......
B :>.~
(/)30
Ql.o
:;:::; :>.N
3.o.c
o ClO
oc
c.fij -c
.- :s 0)
coO(/)
t:: (/)
Ql .c ._
o~E
(/)CJ(/)
Ql ...-
.= ,2 0)
:J.x-
0-.. co
Q)OU
0:: ~.~
.....: CD =
-o:a~
cra
CO'C:!:
. .. co
.eoc
-::: Ql
~ra
CLI
::0
<l:l
.9 ~
o..gf
p"<l:l
<I::...t::
-u
~C
II .B
~~
Zen
~ '" ~ !:: "0
en Q) ttt-- Cl)
~ :; .C -:S g .... 1i:i
1-0 .... Q)"- ~ Cl)
'" E:!:: ~ ....
U
~.~ gr:n ~ ~ "0 "0 'u "0 "0 (3
-8~'.:::~""'a Cl) Cl) '" Cl) Cl) U
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"Ouo._o "0 "0 - "0 "0
'" l:::
'" <I) <I) l::: i:i..r::: . Cl) <I) (3 Cl) Cl) <I)
-..r:::uO<l)o<<,> ~ ~ a ~ ~
g:~g.a-5~ 0
0 0 ..r::: Cl) 0 0
'" <8 ;>-. "'..;; ~ l::: l::: u- !:: ]
l1) 0 u-- ..><: ..><: r:nW ..><:
o tI.:I c:: -- - 0 U U .;! 0 U
"O;!~u~_ <( <( <': <(
~S~::ti~ :0
;:l
::;soU<I)Cl):=: 0..
o 8.l:::..r:::.... 0.
",01i:i<80.
u... '"
f/)
e
o
~
0.
Q)
U
x
Q)
>.
U
e
Q) .
L..LL
50
U....J
e _
O'<t
uo
e(\/
o~
:';::::;0
100
1::(\/
8..c
~u
10 .
hll)
f/).!
u~
e=
10 (.)
o.ClI
x_
Wt:
-0
eO.
-...
'<t .-
_ClI
Q)'<t
.cO
...... (\/
.9~
11)0
ClIO
ID(\/
;.c
IDU
(.)
.~ ~
C1)Q)
II) (ij
ee
ClIO
.c~
"'0.
~ Q)
UU
2~
m>.
e U
.21 e
f/) Q)
Q) t:
U::J
~g
10 0
uu
S:e
U 0
~~
f/).fg
f/)O
'00.
'Of/)
<{~
I.Oh
eOLL
-......0
e~....J
~
Q)
~
.c
>. U
g E .
Q)2Cl1
Olf/)CI)
m >.'"
CJ)ClI
~_ C
._ ro 0
e '0'-
co....
~Eg.
0.L..(.)
'02><
cEID
lUU>-
-.- (.)
Q)OlC
......Q)ID
~rot:
f/Jz::J
Q)U)(.)
=ec
.coo
...... (.)
.~ 2 10
c~Ol
o o..!:
;;::;E.J::
.!!! '-.~
---
::JO.o
f/)elU
CoUi
8 ~ Q)
f/)IVOu.:
Q) .21......
L..~oO
'5 E.c....J
c- Ol 0. '<t-
Q)Cf/)O
a::.- Q) (\/
"E;;I
Scu=~
-OlUO
e~J!!(\/
(]),C- Q)
>f/) '0
O(j) :ow ::]
clU (3
(]) f/) .!:
.co
~::; f/) Q)
0. (.) (]) E::J.J::
E [:5 ::
8E:(:g.g
Q)-......O'c
=ii~E::J
C (]).- >.
mou-u
:5'ii6~5'i
...... CI) !!l.Q t:
5'i .:: <{ g> i3
EO.L..cu.:
(])....~-ooo
L..C U
'5 ID .Q c >.....J
c-E~Q)'ii; .
~Q.-gE~g
(]).200.~C';l
.cIDuO I"-
......>cwoo
f/) ID'n; >:::: 0
2"C1::Q)c(\/
~lU(])U:g.c
(])Q)uQ)OU
O.~ W = 0.
'-"'ouiiiEti
~=5=82
N~ >.......(ij.~
0.....gffi:;=-;;
u~~E5'i5
:iE5~:2;e
_ c 0'5 :(: '0
NlUcC-L..c
SCi8~1U8
'0
C .
m '<t
>....... ...... 0
.ocON
cQ)c~
.2 [.~ g
....OCN
~w~ .
._ > o..c
~Q)L..U
EO.9 .
CI) >. U f/)
... ~ (])o Ol
ClI(ijf/)_
.c::J-..ll<:
"a~~
S m.Q.o
ca '0 15.. Ol
c';;: c
ooo~
t:U::::i~
0"": Ol'E
Q. ~ c ._
o ,u'--
...o.cQ)
Q.E(])L..
>.= E 0
cro(])Ol
10 e Ci.!:
(ij .Q E g
.J:: 0>._ '0
......~cQ)
~..... ~ ::
l;::: 00.0
.-..... cu ~
~5'i~~
UEro:Q
o.of/)
- 0 l;::: C
'0 - .- 0
x Q) U o..u.:
N ii> 2t f/) 0
~"'O fA ~ ...J
("')
I"-
~
Q)
~
-
o
(])
f/)
::Jc
10'-
ulU
(])1::
.o(])
Ol~
c.-
'0 ~
c c
(])Q)
EE
EE
00
Uu
Ef/)u.:
Of/)O
~~....J
u(])
(]) .c '<t-
'01::0
.2~~
u(])1"-
~eo
0. >.0
......10(\/
f5E.c
E >oU
0.(.)
Oc......
-IDQ)
~ t E
Q) ::II (])
UYL..
<{ClU
o (/)
. (.) e
'<t_o
-0'-
~o~
-.c c
("')(.)0
~c.oo
~
Q)
~
iii
Q) Ol
.0 0
o ~
+-' .U
C C 10
OQ).o
-Ell)
1aQ)lI)
C)>~
~ou
E Q-g
C1).S 0
... ......
ClICu
.c .Q Q)
"(ij~
.:1::Q)
J! 8..0
S~.9
calU......
C h 0
.2 U c
1:: s: .~
o U C
Q.(])o
o 0.._
"'(/)m
Q.(I)Ol
(/)0:2
~EEu.:
=L...co
<(ou...I
Q) ~
Ccll)V-
-o(ijo
'g.9:5C';l
mUlI)~
u.!~o
:::::::o-cN
co~~.c
s'Ouu
~
(I)
Z
N
to
......
("')
("')
CD
......
CD ~
(.) (])
... .c
.2 3=(1)
.lll: lI) .2
l5 cQ)C=
~ .2'0 Q)
::0<'0 ....c(/)
CC ClI(])_
'n; 10 1:: '(3 0
~m &.l;:::w
u;::' II)Q)>
L..CD cu~
.Eo ca ~u
>.0 .::: ~ 2
utO 10'0
5'i~ .c15.g
t;f/)u.:1? 10
::J=O.o.9(1)
g'~....I.!!! ~:5
o......tO.:(:.i:lI)
UC 0'0
E2~.9.c(])
e'~~c~~
-~OQ)ClIX
15..ooEQQ)
EU(\/coQ)
Q)u.cw::ii:E
x(I)u>y2
(])fr OCllO
c- moO>
10 g! ("') (ij >0.2
lI)(]) u(.):t::
3=uU;.2~~
.2 C)CD lU ...... ......
-co
<{.- . lI) ::II c
_~~3=g~
I"-o,?go.x
S.c(/)<((.)Q)
'<t
I"-
......
1.0
......
Q)
:E
'" '"
U <I)
;';;;;0.0
0..=
0..",
<..r:::
-u
ZQ
II 0
S
<1<j
Z~
co
'"""
o
s:::::
'"
"'p...
8::E
eo
c.
....>-.
S:::::.D
Cl)"l:l
e Cl)
"l:l '"
s::::: '"
Cl) Cl)
~:g
p... ro
::s
o
~
z
'"i
Q)
z
m
'"""
~
co
'"""
C')
C')
co
'"""
c
o
+J~ ..r::
~o U
XOO
19 g-~ ~
Q) e L: cd~
-o~u Cra
..2.....-0 Ciiiii
g'Oai ::IE
.- e 0 ~
OolL .eo
.....:;::>0 '-
>> ra ...J .~ '0
=E(ij - cue:
o a. co -e '-
L: Q) (J) Q) ra
..... ... '""" 0 -e
:Ja.' enQ)
raQ)~ enO
Q)L:O ~Qi
=.....N -0-0
_en. -oc
OQ)L: ra~
en .: U - ~
L... :J ca '-'
Q) c:T. L: .s
~~~ -;;:0
O-ora -Q)
a. e l5.. e a.
Q)raCl Q)x
=ClO EQ)
en .~ 32 -g ~
Q)OO Q)
eCl'll E.9u.:
;;::ra..c raenO
~~{)' cc...J
'C eu.:~ Q)<<i
'EQ)~Oa.E(J)
l'llE5...Jen~""';'
-OQ)O _~.-......
C '- C v 0 5-0
199oo=Q)o
en ._ 0 N <( '- N
Cl)
:0
~ en
o Cl)
:':::eo
g;a
<C..c::
.....U
*,C
II S
.....z
~ ~
Zoo
LO
......
.w
o
s::
'"
~p...
o~
80
c..
...>.
s::.D
0"0
S 0
"0 '"
s:: '"
o~
~"O
t.s
p...
~
o
p...
~
o
>.
.D
"0
o
'"
'"
o
.e
"0
t.s
...
o
Z
.w
o
c
'"
"'p...
8~
80
c..
tLS
0"0
S 0
"0 '"
C '"
o ~
~:g
t.s
p...
::;s
c.?
<
Z
~
Z
~
Z
<
Z
~
Q)
~
~
Q)
~
~
T"'
-
T"'
Q)
T"'
('f)
M
<0
T"'
~
Q)
~
10
<0
~
N
('f)
M
<0
T"'
m
it)
Q)
o
10
c:i
N
"f
~
Q)
~
N
co
N
en
('f)
('f)
a:
-
-
T"'
;;::-
co
T"'
('f)
('f)
<0
T"'
Q)
N
N
('f)
M
<0
......
C 0 I ~ C)
- C N E ~ i ~=Ec
COO ~~~ oWOllS
o~ ~~B e 0 ~u; -~~~
>-,~ Q) :c 0 0 0) N Ul lIS E :z ~ ';;; _
OUl..c =~~...... e~~ lISUlCD Q) cO
c~~ oe"fE ~lISU UlllS~ O&Q)C
~o~ -~oo -Ul ~~~ e~E~
~~c SQ)~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~a
,E;IV~Ul ~5bC ~Q) Q) ~~~ ~~ lii.g
Q)..c- -00& wEE ~i~ ~oElIS
= :: ~ 0.- NEw c... ~ "0 Q) C 03: ro 0
C co:; ~ ~ & ~ ~ Q C .0 CD "0 >...c >-
oQ)o ~~uf OllS~ lIS>-t lIS_Oo
C'\IcE>. caEE~g' afJ~ ~E~ c.~~lii
ic',Q~2' Q)c_ ~'-Q) :rcc Q)E~:::J
IVQ)~ t:XlISC ~~~ OQ8 ~E~Ei
,_~~~ ~~~E ~[~ ~~C cOQ)~
>- & lIS lIS ~ 0. ~ E _ -5,,e 0 Q)E 0 x Q) ~
~c>~ Ul 0 &lIS= -~- Q)Q)=O
lISlIS_O_Q)lIS~~ -~-c ~c~ lIS_~ ~
Q)Ul- -_->- ca~_ Ul - c=cc
>-_c~~cT"' -~c ~8~o ro-lISO~
~C& O)Q)'& .wE -c
Q)Q)uCOQ)Eb~~&lIS~ ~..c~ ~Q)Ecm
~E=Q)cQ)ollSO~-~ ~ow "OEca~~
Q)~ ~--N_~_~:::J _:::JC Q)Q)~IV~
o c O)~ 0 Q) . 0 _ ca _ Q) ~ Ul e ~ ~ O)~ 0
'~Q)=o::c..cc"fErom o~- "0 OEo
~Ew~cQ)UQ~&>~ ~~CD~~~~=~
Q) ro ~ Q) E . IV . ~ :::J:::J Q) '0 ~ 0 x - _ (ij ..c
E~2~Emo~o~caeoo Cro_~mllSOmU
ro....U~m ~ ;t-~ cS=>-
E-- CllST"'~O~~c OC-<OroUl~~oo
o ~ ~ ,Q) C T"' Q) N Ul ~ Q) >-g ~~ Ul C C Q) C
~oo~EroQ)..c~Q)CB '~lISca' Q)Q)o~Q)
~C-OllSEM~U..cg~~Q.t_b~E;Q)E
~~~~c~M"O ~~~Ooo.o=~ca~~
Ea-ollS-Ul<ocoo:Co~~~~CN.oC>~C
Q)O..cN"OlIS......~~roro> _~Ul_ roQ)O~Q)
x"O~~~ooox~w.e~ro~~~wEcQ)E
WllS~Ul<OUlW wEmN~~cauwroS5ro
<0
~
......
00
~
......
~
~
T"'
m
~
T"'
o
00
......
......
00
ca
-a
'i:
o
ii:
-
o
w
~
ca
....I
,:
N
N
.
co
0'
o
N
.c
o
"0
C
ca
-
CD
-
.
co
C)
o
N
.c
o
co
o
C)
N
W
~
~
~
W
~
~
~
W
t-
t.s
C 1:
.- u
S e
a~
o u
o 6
C,_
'" d
g t
"0 0
p... '"
::;s s
o 0
<
z
-
~
co
;;::-
~
T"'
('f)
M
<0
......
>-
m
~
Q)
c
Q)
<0
co
W
~
~
~
~
co
;;::-
~
T"'
('f)
M
<0
T"'
C
.Q
IV
~
Q)
Ul
C
o
o
>-
~
Q)
c
Q)
t)
'0..
m
~
~
00
......
~
......
W
J:
~
C
lIS
..c
......
S
co
;;::-
~
......
('f)
M
<0
......
Ul
m
~
.0
c
'C
~
~
C
lIS
Ul
C
lIS
~
vi
~
~
ro
"0
c
lIS
w
Q)
~
::J
(3
oS;
W
:::J
E
-
c
Q)
E
Q)
Cii
m
c
'00
::J
o
..c
m
..c
t-
Cl)
:c
<<$ rIl
o u
:'::::00
o..s::
0..<<$
<-=
.....u
~c
II .B
;::l
<1ii
ZtZi
~
co
;;::-
,.....
T"'
('f)
M
<0
m
-
co
;;::-
,.....
......
('f)
M
<0
......
~
co
;;::-
,.....
T"'
('f)
M
<0
T"'
:a
-
~
~
,.....
T"'
('f)
M
<0
T"'
00
00
......
~ ~ ..c
.!2 0 U
C ,2 ~ l:l 00
Q)z,.... C> C
.0 0 m Q) c ,Q
lE.!!1......Ul OUl t)
Q) Q) 00::J ._ Ul m
1= I >- 0 0 IV 'E :t:
~ ~ mo -2 t Q) lIS
~ ~Ci>NQ) Olll Iii
Ul mc c ~ m ~ lIS ..c_
c Q) '- ~m
lIS Q)Q)Om ~
.0 c~.c ~Q)lIl _0
~ O::JlIlO
::J ~~ E ~ . Q) g 0
Q) ::J_Q)::J~"O..c ~
m "0"0 - "0 0 .2 c ~,
lIS Q)cUlQ) OQ) '"
5 lIlllSUllll~CQ) ~
o lIS lIS - ,- ~ ::J W
o .oo>c.oT"'wm (3 .::J
Ul Q) :S ,Q Q) ~ ::J C :: ~ E
:0 .0 Ul :z.o I E.~ Ul ~ Ul
W - .x ,- - co 0 ::J Q)
Ul Q) E Ul 00 C .- E .....: 'C
::J :::J~Ul::J Q)u mQ)
E E.e~E~E::J -T"'f/J
c Cm~c..cQ)~ lii'~
lIS lISc-lISUCii~ E~lISE
~ ~~ ~ Ci , c Ul Q) 0
m m3roQ)f/JOUl QjNQ)~
~ ~8c~.!!!~~ c~~O
"0 "Oog"O.!:;-ou.:go"O...J_
c crollScllSerooro oCT"'
.!2 .!2 III (j; .!2 ~ '0 0 ~ ~ ~ .!2 Q)
Q) .Q)EcQ)f/J - _Q)~Q)~
~~~Q)Q)~C.g:3T"'f/JlIS~CO
::Jo::J:::: ::Jo-,_Q)c~::Jo
~~~lIS~"5+::romT"'O ~o
- -~Q)-o~Q)ooOm-N
Q).....:Q)Q)3:m~mIVoQ)cQ) .
~~~~0~~~~~~8~t5
N
co
T"'
('f)
00
T"'
"f
00
......
10
co
......
w ~ ~
I- Z Z
....
'" ;>. 0
o:l-
~-; "'!
....-
CI.l U ;>.
'0 ._ C
CI.l =o:lUJ u
OIl 8J3- ;.:=~
'0 , U 0:;>
CI.l "C o:l CI.l P-......:l
~ CI.l 00- 1.l...
0 .g>.5 ~ ooCl.l
c
...>c: ..2 Q.. o:l "C,.c
u ~o~ (1)_
-< 0'0 ~
C o:l 0
...>c: c ]
u CI.l
-<2 u
-<
00
..-
C')
"- 0>
"" .~
>- "0
.~ 0>
0 E
a. 0
w w w <( ~
t) t) ~ --
z z
'0 '0 '0 "C
CI.l CI.l CI.l CI.l
OIl OIl OIl OIl
'0 '0 '0 '0
(I) CI.l CI.l CI.l ~
~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 z
.Q c ] c
...>c: ...>c:
u u u u
-< -< -< -<
-<
--
z
C
.!!!
a.
0> ~
:> 0>
'in .ri e,j U Z
C
0> ..- ..- ..- ..- ~ ""
.r:. e ~ :2 - g :0-
S ~ m ~ :S 10 -
(0 a. "" C') M (0 (0 (0 (0 ..- 10
t:::' E ~ ~ t:::' t:::' t:::' t:::' t:::' t:::' a
0
"- t) (0 (0 "- "- "- "- "- "- 00
..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ...... ..- ..- ..-
C') 0> C') M C') C') C') C') C') C') C')
M ro M M M M M M M C') M
(0 - (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 co (0 co co
..- en ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ......
0> U U 0>
rn 0> "" 0> I Cll
6;:' (j; 0> 0> ...... 0) 0> .~ 0> 0> L.
~ ~ ~ ~ -g ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ 8 ~ i ~ ~ : ~ ~ 2 B ~ -
1ii:; L. ~ 0> "0 CD Cll t) - c C') C rn (j; ~ u.: .5 0 cD . Ci CI.! 0 -8 g tV rn ~
co ~C) :>~u.:~~B ~Q)Eu.:o>~~~ ooo~ooO~o~N ~en ~Cll0>6
om .r:.o> rnO>o,,' "" 0 OC -Cll - - ...... - -~ 0 mL."
00> -0 .~~ ,'- ~ - C ",,0> ;:'Cm.r:. _...J_CC...J--O L.' mO
u L. 0> 0> ~, ~:.... CD"" 0 W ...J -, .!!! U t) C - COo c.c a. a. :z U 0>
C >- .~ -5 .r:. E r-:O II) C .. ~ - >- - 0> Q):g Q); .. CO- Q) X ... U 0> ~ .5 en
m ~ :> 0> ~ -- "" l&. c.Q g L. $ ~ .c 0 .r:. ri E, E.= 0 ~ E:s."fti C 0 - m
C Q) Q) L. a. E "" _ ClS"O 0> C , Q) >-- C ~ 0> ~ 0 m 0> ~ C') u.: m e C 1:: en
O)C L.o E<Pch.o-fQ) en .cO>O)u=lIio o>gO>II) oo>~g>O=...a. m8ClS
'o>in _: 1ii -; 0 co.. ::> en = . E E g .2:0 c.. C "" C f .5 0 C C') :C...J CD _ -e CD
U .c E .~ t) E ~ .....~ = . ca 8 ~ "" g 15 g g g L. g CD U ~ g ~ L. - i: ffi ;:, 2 :;;
m ~ 2~(j;~.9~ f ~e(j;-a..!!!en m2m~!2m~~~CDE m~c
~~ ~~ jYy-~~~ : o~-~~~~ ~~~t~m~B~~i~ ffi~!
Effi Cll~u.:en::=m~~c c --!CO~..- ~t)~~m.r:.~-~o~Q) uo>o.
>- L. 0 rn 0 Q) 0 .r:. en m m ca 00 (ij t) O>E Q)'- 0 0 0 L. t) 0 ~ C "" ... Emu CD
0_ ^O> ,=~t)~Q).r:. -c oo~ :>~"" OMO~a.MO~Q)L.!Cll _ou>c
Co..... U ~ _ 0 0 a. - Q) 0> - - - L. rn .-, - rn E 0> - 0 -
Q) ~~ crno>oo--;:, ClS ""mC')-o>~S~ mcmmrncmL.c-~S ccCD
.- 0> - ..- .- 0 ~ rn .Q - 0 c .- .-, - 0 - - 0> .p;:, L. c,u ~ >-
om COO)o>L.~N .....- 00>0= c..cc QCa.o>Cll-li rn~
E;:' CllE..-u~c. m~ ::J L.o>..rnmE~ 0>00>.28tO> :>.r:._ =a.g
0>0> corommo"cc CD !:6O;:'BL.;:' E~EoCio>ESot)~~ mo>CD
>-:6 ~ - 0 E -.. C moll) 0 0> U 0 -, c.." c:> en c c: 0) -::J - LL .r:. :> ..
0) - - 0 tV 0 ~ .c .- c: E - en cULL 0 (j;. (j; c Q) (j; CD - C') ... .r:. - 'in ... u.:
(j; _5 .~ ffi "" ~ = ~Io -=- :g CD B 0> . tV m . - :> II) :> tV :6 cD :> E ~ c :; 0)9 ~ c ~ 0 Go)
c U u.: . 0> - _.co oJ .- C 0> ro CD - ;:, II) cD 0 c: 0:6 _ rn 0 CD o.Q u;:, = 0> c: ...J ::0
0> cO-E ~B::=oo ~-cn O)ID ~ ou:C ~ o>~o ~.!! ~L. 0 0 ~f="O"i:.,g~ l!.~ 0 _ ~ '"
C tV...J 0>- rn .eno cU 0 a..; 2.c 0 0> Q) 0> 0> '- Q) QC 0> Q_~"_ L. uco._ Go)
-- 0) EO>- 0> ~ 0 ~ Q) . C - E ;:, ca ~ = e- "" c" C :6 rn ~ C ClS Q) en ca C"- .~ a.E c 0) p.. bll
U C C rn 0) - N'- .r:. ~ 0 LL 0 - CD - '-.- - .- CD .- m ~ .- 0 - 0 m COm a. c
~~~E~6~~~_~-;0~0~~_~!ClSg ~~~~m~~1~en~~o::J8~o<~
0... ~o ~ ~ ro 'in .r:. ..- S... = 0>...J.5...J rn c _ - tV ! 0> - ca - ~.= .r:. - 0 tV c: 2 S 2 E .ft :! 2 .... u
- 00 - 1:: rn 0 L. ~ ..4)- rn rn - - Q) c - rn.r:. - c . rn E rn 0 ;:, - rn _ 0 = .u..~ ~....~ 0
o -; 0 & o.E rn.sl - Q).S: ~ -8 ~ 6 m.!!! ~:: ::J ~ o~ ~... ~ ro 0- ~ ~ :; ffi ~ rn ~ Qj m ~ 00. (j; Z C
- ... 0 a. ~ a. L.. 0) 0> I I a. 0> u .- .u U -, .-...- 0> _ .- ... 0> ca 0> 0> _ rn _ II 0
0> Q) "" (ij rn 0> 0 m Q)..qs c L. 0) rn 0> _ .r:. c: ::J'i:: = ...J ~ 0 ;:, U L. _;:, c: ~ :; C L. ::= c II) ....
.c c . 0 c rn 'i::.r:. ::=.c. m U 0 U 0 rn - ca 0- 2.c E _ 0- 0- ~ U en 0-- .;:::; ;0:: .- Cll 0 0> c: m < .a
_.r:. 0 m m m t) o(:).r:. c 0 U 0 0 '- c: O>'i:: ::J 0 ~ 0> .. Q) c. 0> L. Q) CD 0> O>.r:. = E ClS .r:. C<l
Bot)...J~ >- ~t)m""<(,,,,~S;~0a.~00~~~Em~~S.c..0:6t)<(mbt)2~
en
0> 0 0
00 o>g..- "" C') ~ lO CO "- 00 0)
a>
..-
::!;
z
::!;
z
::!;
z
::!; ::!;
z z
"-' "-'
0 0
V"I ~
V"I
....'" ....
(.) 0 .~
.- en "0
- en
o 0
~ .... ~~
.:g I f-<
-0 <<l -0 0
Ou.) 0..0
,gff-< OIl....
-0
.2 0 0
~;S ~
0 0
s:: s::
..:><: ..:><:
(.) (.)
<< <<
::!;
z
-0
~
-0
o
~
o
I::
..:><:
(.)
<<
-0
o
OIl
-0
o
~
o
I::
..:><:
(.)
<<
-0
o
OIl
-0
o
~
o
I::
..:><:
(.)
<<
-0
~
-0
o
~
o
I::
..:><:
u
<<
o
u:
-
o
en
.~
ftI
...J
en
o
N
.
o
'r"':
o
N
"tJ
C
ftI
II)
o
N
.
o
-
o
N
. ..c ...
0CO u..~ I N 2
.....0 C -Q) ..c a> co a.
~~ - 0 C (IJ..c -':=00 _ (IJ
C <0 :w :c 0..... - :JO' Q)..c
Q)1::a> ftI - Q>, ~Ca..N 0_>0
E Oc. m 1:: .~ _.0 Q) ~I 0 ..._ CO'-
o >-ft1 II) " ..c a> Q) en 2 0 ..c iii cO
(lJlI)g c. = ~Q)-OC~o. N-~..-
.9;N en,,= .....cC~O~CO N':g,Q)C
(IJ ...... C C .Q ftI .!a 0 ... Q) o>..c O!!! ~ ,g
Q)-Q) :!COO C:OWQ).ocO ~~~
liila15.. -Q)E OCOQ).....O:oJ - ~O>W~
(IJ ,,0 :w~E -~~ QCOoo
"0..c Q):J'Cu.:c.Q)=~>'XC -..!!!C
ffi 18 0 ;E U 5 0 Gl Q) ~ 0 ~ Q).Q 0 Q) . _ .....
-C.... - C C - -' ~ 0...... - 'u ~U ~ iii:S ~
CO "It Q) ..!!! U Ii'~ >, "It ftI Q) 0 -0 a. a.
~i~ ~15..e~~~~g;ioo ~!~~
:Jiu *~;me~i~Ri~ ~~~~
~ 0 ~ - (IJ 0 g f ..L e Q) -; ~'C o.:J Q)
C Q) ~ .9 ~ ~ ... Q) .... 00 1:: x - ('I... Cf.! 0> E
Q)-' - -~a;.E .OQ)-g .;,.u..CQ)
U ~ = .~!; 2 C - C E ~.!a:J ~ ,...;; ~ '5
~ .~ f 11... 0 (IJ 8 ~ .Q ~ C Q) e '< ~ := 0-
.. 0 Q) ftI C ftI - .s:::. - iii II) ftI.2 0> .~. t:::. U ~
c" C Q) e : 0 5 0.. t UJ .:: ~ 13 o. r--. ~ 0>
.!a 0 .2 E 0 .- -<t- ,- 0 0 'tJ Q) (IJ N..- 0 .~
- - E .. CD 1i:i U lFii ~ C{>.Q _ C") 0 C
iii C c. Q) g.~ g1::~ C'tJ C)'QU '9 M ~ ffi
~..!!!~ >U:!:oJ00~0c)0..LS 0<00-
>,0.)( &><-OQ.:Jt-E_Q)o _ 00.
~ID~ ~II)IDenE ~~>ID OcmQ)
5 .~ >. (ij >- c en C W a.! U ~ '0' N 2 c.~ .
OWU Ouo .:!--cftlu", enoCOWu..
U :ii ~ 0 C :oJ 0 - c c - .Q Q) a. .... Q) u :ii 0
m.s:::.... -;;; f~ 18.~ EQ) EQ).~ coo..rou..' S 0 Q)..c-l
Q)... Q)...o..._ WoC WWQ)-
W "'::::J .!:::::::J a. CO a. E t Gl Q) U 0 0 W ~
:= Eo.uu.::J U W..c Q) Q) :g,.-;.~ (lJE-I ftI * ~ i5..0
o C o-CCOo> .........Q)u -;c-uE..-
':A' 0 002 0 ~ :Jwx oClQ)=OQ)..cu~ OoQ)u 00
......OU-I.....u_w 0>", _(lJco-.- COON
o
--
o
N
-
~
<0
..-
-
O/S
M "It e
::c ::c
- - 6' N
u:;- u:;- ..- ..-
0 0 0 0
co co co co
..- ..- ..- ..-
C") C") C") C")
M C") M C")
<0 <0 <0 <0
..- ..- ..- ..-
W
Q)
0>
ffi uw13u
.s:::. Q) Q) 0>2
o ~O>CQ)0
....0> ecoQjQ)
Oc Q)m.s:::. O>W0
.~ .-c U.s:::. 0 u C Q) Q)
E Q) uo>Q) CO 0>0>
ro ~ ~ g>.~ ~-fi ffi ffi
.... a. :J ii 'E :J o>..c .s:::.
Q)Q) O>...oo>cOO
~ .~ ffi ~ := ffi ii 0> 0>
W0 -:>...-...cc
wC SogS~'E'E
~~ u~c'-E~"'oO
co~ Q)o'E 00:=:=
EO. roW ..wc......
E Q).o':uj.o'E-oO
- o.oen.o cc
~ 8 ~ Uj u.: ~Uj cij'E 'E
'C Q) _.. _..:.:: . .....
Q> uju..:Cxu..u..ujuj
u.. :oJ . ,...;;xo,...;;,...;; . .
'0 ~ u.._~~~~~ u.._ ~
WQ) <or--.r--r--CO..--<tN
:=~ N<or--r--.r--..-..-o
CO:J ~MMMM~~~
-Iw MMMMMMMM
N- U <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0
OQ) ~~~,-..-..-..-..-
.-It:: cccccccc
o~ oo.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q
-r-o.............-.............................
DcC~~~~~~~~
~o~enooCl)CI)CI)CI)CI)CI)
Q) " Q)
"O....c..... . . . . . . - .
m O':J"- N C") "It ~ <0 r-- co
..c :c g
0:=....
0>
.~
'E
o
:=
...
o
c-
,- 0
~&w
~m~
Q)-Q) CI)
>oE
Q)C u..
WO~
l/) U ':J
Q).s:::. 0-
7ij.2 Q)
.s:::....
E:=o> .m
- _c .CI)
(IJ .'e: CI) u.: "
"CI)c'
'C u.: m u.. ,...;;
o --mo
LL=o.c;;-x
......t~~:!..<O
om'- r--r-- r--
~a.~<or--r--
ro("f~MMM
-I<OQ)MMM
-..- "'<0(0(0
LO '- C>-..- ..- ..-
~$Eccc
'0.0000
om 0._._._
C;.s:::.Q)uuu
NO~~~~
...wco
S:g,"E. . .
o.cQ)"-NC")
coco~
G-fi~
c:J
:c
ell
.~ ~
-~
g;1::
<~
-u
~C>
II .9
::l
~t<i
zri)
o
N
..-
..-
..-
C")
..-
..-
N
C")
::f
z
::f
z
::f
z
::f
z
o
N
::f
z
"0 "0 "0
a) a) a)
blI OIl blI
"0 "0 "0
a) a) ::f ::f a)
~ ~ ~
0 0 Z Z 0
!:: !:: ~
.:.: .:.:
0 0 0
<( <( <(
(I)
Ol
r:::
1'0
.r::.(I)
0>
C) +:;
r:::ro
.-.....
Ur:::
'- (I)
0.....
~ VJ
::::J
'- VJ
0.....
.50
E&
1'01'0
(I).....
~o
1'0 r::: .
EVJVJ
(l)c
- 0 (I)
-:guE
'c.r::. (I)
0.2.!::
U::.r::.::::J
_~cr
o ~ ~
VJ en Ol
~ . r:::
1'0 u.. .-
..Jri~
-N 1'0
~1015..
N "! Q)
, M >
~ co'iij
o~r:::
Nr:::Q)
,-o.r:::
(1):0::> (I)
.....0'-
Q.Q)Q.
roenE
.r::. 0
U.50
~
~
r:::
o
:0::>
o
(I)
en
-(I)
VJ
::::J
o
.r::.
Ol
r:::
'C
ro
(I)
C3
VJ
o
o
.r::.
o
en
I-
0::
<(
:2:.
C/)u..
= 0
(I)..J
VJ -
COO
'-I'-
.r::: I
0.0
(I)~
.r::.o
_N
u'-
(I)~
- 0.
~ro
Q).r::.
OU
v
~
e
u
r:::
ro
~
-
~
r:::-
I'-
I'-
~
M
M
co
</l u..
Bug
:;::i c::
.!!1roN
mr:::CO
(;) .Q "7
.5 10 ~
>..50
~'E~
~g~
EoQ.
vCij~
~'oU
~ ~....:
..... VJ
1;j >. B
.-.0 .-
ouo
.....Q)(I)
~o en
en (I) .
u..:1ij2
_ r:::
IOVJQ)
I'-cE
~Q)Q)
~ E.!::
~E~
~Q)(I)
> '-
c: 0 r:::
,g Ol.Q
~mm
VJ g.2
</l- r:::
Q) M ::::J
.~ v E
>uE
(I) r::: 0
0:: co 0
10
::f
z
::f
z
:0
-
~
o
co
~
M
M
co
~
Q)
:5~
o~
-1'0 .
VJ....u..
....~O
~'iii ..J
r:::-ri
roOM
.r::.(I)'
(I) 010
r:::ro~
;O::og
(1)_
uVJa;
.90a.
- Q) 1'0
0gtj
u.. ro _
- r::: ~
:C~r:::
::=::co
~'iiiU
oE(I)
co _ (j)
~(I)
~:;ui
~o.~
~~~
c: :J 0
.Q ~~
oE~
Q) </l
VJ~~
-o.oJ::;
Q)Eo
VJ Q)'_
.:;: </l:C
(I) </l :J
O::roQ.
Q)
:0
o;l
.~ ~
c.gp
Q.o;l
<..d
.....U
~C
II .B
<E
-.... o;l
Zoo
N
10
I'-
~
M
M
co
~
~
(0
t::'
I'-
~
M
M
co
~
co
Q)
.r::.
-.....(1)
ro'-.r::.
0(1)_
.Q:2 Ol
M ~ .5 ~
vOa;o
Q)ou:o::>
.r::. -.- ro
.....VJ</l-
.....:Jr:::Cij
~E81;j
..... - r:::
>. . r:::.-
~~~ c:-
l6u..~J9
0. - .-
VJN ~=
o IO~ E
-_ I'- u.. .9
cnMU:;:2 .
u..:MIO~~
.-::.~ I'- ._ ..J
co ~ X _
XB~eN
co ._ M 0. co
t:::"'13coCl)'7
I'-(I)~(I)O
. </l r::: VJ ~
~r:::o::::Jo
M .- :0::> N
couo-g,-
~ (I) (I)</l ro 2
c: iii - a..
.Q = .5 '0 ~
o 2 u >'u
Q)r:::Q)~
VJ(I)1;j=-
E .- .0 N
VJ -.-
Q)r:::VJeuB
VJ a; 0 0..-
.~ ~ 0 ~ ~
0:: Q) of!! 0 (j)
co
I'-
2.5 Assessment of Methodology for Concurrency Management
Background:
Section 163.3191 (2) (P), Florida Statutes, requires the Evaluation & Appraisal Report to
provide an assessment of the extent to which changes are needed to develop a common
methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing
its concurrency management system in coordination with the municipalities and cOWlties.
Analysis:
The only municipality inside the geographic boWldary that comprises Collier COWlty that
performs a separate transportation system and concurrency review is the City of Naples, and
Marco Island. Naples operates inside of a TCEA. All other jurisdictions within Collier County
fall under the COWlty'S methodology which is regulated by the adopted TIS Guidelines and
consistent with the review performed by the other jurisdictions within the COWlty and FDOT.
Continual coordination between the multiple jurisdictions occurs through interaction with the
Collier MPO.
GMP
Elements .
Assessments
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Capital Improvement Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals,
Objectives and Policies, as defined below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO"
followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the
goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement",
"Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an
activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the
Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County
shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may"
or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes,
designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and
grammatical changes.
Certain Sub-Element references to be renamed, including Sub-Element, Goal and throughout
Objectives and Policies
Policy 1.4 - revision to introduce reducing VMT and GHG ennsslOns as criterion for further
prioritizing projects; revision to provide another option/more options.
Policy 1.5 - revisions related to multi-Element revisions in a comprehensive effort to manage
redundancy; revision related to 2010 CIE adoption with "Regional Park land" LOSS change from
2,9 to 2.7 acres per 1,000/population; revisions related to FDOT comments to the DCA.
Policy 2.10 reconsider revision recommended that would allow for more-responsIve fiscal
management, as this Policy remains relevant and should not be changed.
Objective 3 - minor revision timeframe reference.
Policy 3.1 - minor revisions associated with new terminology.
Policy 4.1 - minor revision to provide updated Statutory cite.
Policy 4.2 - revision no longer necessary within context of EAR amendments; amendment to provide
updated reference cite was made recently as part of201O CIE adoption (Ordinance No. 10-43).
Policy 4.6 - minor revisions associated with new terminology.
Policy 4.7 - minor revision to include an additional "best practices" entry.
1
CIE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 5.1 - minor revisions associated with new terminology; may need minor revision to provide
updated Statutory cite.
2
CIE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Capital Improvement Element
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as
follows:
TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN
ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF
SERVICE.
The intent of the Capital Improvement Element is to identify public facilities that will be required
during the next five years, including the cost of such facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be
used to fund construction or development of the facilities. As such, the Capital Improvement Element
is updated annually, including revision ofthe 5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008
included the initial step toward re-naming of certain Sub-Elements including: from the "Sanitary
Sewer" Sub-Element to the "Wastewater Treatment" Sub-Element; from the "Drainage" Sub-Element
to the "Stormwater Management" Sub-Element, and; from the "Solid Waste" Sub-Element to the
"Solid Waste Disposal" Sub-Element. The new names initially appeared in the Capital Improvement
Element as combinations of old and new names as a transition preceding these EAR-based
amendments. The new names - no longer in their transitional forms - should be used in all titles,
headings and text within this Element, and in all references to these Sub-Elements found throughout
the Growth Management Plan.
As currently formatted, the Capital Improvement Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its
supporting Objectives and Policies. This Goal should be retained as written.
B. Objectives Analysis:
OBJECTIVE 1 (PUBLIC FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS):
Identify and define types of public facilities, establish standards for levels of service for each
such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities is needed in
order to achieve and maintain the standards.
Policy Relevance:
There are five (5) policies within this Objective.
Policy 1.4:
Public facility improvements are to be considered in the following order or priority:
A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and
renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service.
1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service.
C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next
five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of this Capital Improvement Element
In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all
applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the
following priority order to serve:
1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment,
2. previously approved development orders permitting new development,
3. new development orders permitting redevelopment, and
4. new development orders permitting new developments.
o. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the
operating cost of providing a service or facility.
E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next
five fiscal years by either:
1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth
beyond the next five fiscal years, or
2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's
normal design criteria for such facilities.
This Policy explains the method for prioritizing public facilities' improvements. This Policy remains
relevant and should be retained and revised to add a closing statement associated with the Major Issue
of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, such as, When further considering projects prioritized by
this order, the higher priority shall be assigned to improvements designed to reduce, or not
increase, greenhouse gas emissions through shortened vehicular trip lengths, trips taken by
another mode of transportation, or by other substantive means.
[public Comment from February 23, 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting the planning period
should be extended beyond ten years.]
[planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 27. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that
additional language maybe needed to more clearly provide for the option of not constructing certain
improvements at all.]
Policy 1.5:
The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows:
A. Roadways:
1. Arterials and collector roads: Level of Service indicated below on the basis of peak
hour, traffic volume:
Level of Service "E" on all six-lane roads
2. Level of Service "0" peak hour on all other County and State arterial and collector
roads not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS).
2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
B. State and Federal Roads:
Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of
those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). In Collier County, FOOT sets and
maintains the LOS for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows:
EXISTING
RURAL AREA
1-75 B
EXISTING
URBANIZED AREA
C
TRANSITIONING
URBANIZED AREA
C
C. County Surface Water Stormwater Management Systems:
1. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in
Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10.
2. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage - stormwater
management facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm
return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master
Plan as listed in the Drainage Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public
Facilities Element.
D. County Potable Water Systems:
1. County systems:
County Water District = 170 gallons per capita per day
2. Municipal systems:
City of Naples = 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area
Everglades City = 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area
3. Private potable water systems I Independent district systems:
Water flow design standards as identified in Policy 3.1 of the Potable Water
Sub-Element of this Growth Management Plan.
Orangetree Utilities = 100 gallons per capita per day
Immokalee Water and Sewer District = 105 gallons per capita per day
Florida Governmental Utility Authority = 109 gallons per capita per day
Ave Maria = 110 gallons per capita per day within service area
E. County Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treabnent Systems:
1. County systems:
North Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day
South Sewer Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day
Southeast Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day
Northeast Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day
2. Municipal systems:
City of Naples = 145 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area
Everglades City = 100 gallons per capita per day
3. Private sanitary sewer - wastewater treatment systems:
Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer _
Wastewater Treabnent Sub-Element of this Growth Management Plan.
3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
Orangetree Utilities = 100 gallons per capita per day
Immokalee Water and Sewer District = 100 gallons per capita per day
Florida Governmental Utility Authority = 100 gallons per capita per day
Ave Maria = 110 gallons per capita per day within service area
F. County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities:
1. Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the
previous three (3) years.
2. Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three
(3) years.
G. County Parks and Recreation Facilities:
1. Regional Park land
2. Community Park land
= 2.9 acres per 1,000/pop.
= 1.2 acres per 1,000/pop. (unincorporated)
H. Public School Facilities:
1. Elementary schools
2. Middle schools
3. High schools
= 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment I FISH Capacity
= 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment I FISH Capacity
= 100 percent (1.00) of CSA Enrollment I FISH Capacity
This Policy establishes standards for levels of service for each such public facility. This Policy
remains essentially relevant and should be retained except for changes discussed below, and those
associated with the renaming of certain public facilities and their attendant Sub-Elements.
The LOSS for County arterial and collector roads appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "A" above is one
of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.3 in
the Transportation Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except
that the two Policies are somewhat dissimilar. These differences should be reconciled and a single
location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with
Transportation Policy 1.3 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in
both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Element
entries could elaborate on the figures.
The LOSS for State and Federal roads appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "B" above is one of two
locations within this GMP where these standards are shown, The other location is Policy 1.4 in the
Transportation Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that
the two Policies are somewhat dissimilar. These differences should be reconciled and a single location
selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Transportation
Policy 1.4 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations,
then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Element entries could
elaborate on the figures.
The LOSS for stormwater management systems appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "C" above is one
of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 2.1 in
the Stormwater Management Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary
redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and
a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location,
4
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
with Stormwater Management Policy 2.1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to
show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while
the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures.
The LOSS for potable water systems appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "D" above is one of two
locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 3.1 in the
Potable Water Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except
that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location
selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Potable Water
Policy 3.1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations,
then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could
elaborate on the figures.
The LOSS for wastewater treatment systems appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "E" above is one of
two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 2.1 in the
Wastewater Treatment Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy,
except that the two Policies are not the same, These differences should be reconciled and a single
location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with
Wastewater Treatment Policy 2.1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the
LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-
Element entries could elaborate on the figures.
The LOSS for solid waste disposal facilities appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "F" above is one of
two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 2.5 in the
Solid Waste Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except
that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location
selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Solid Waste
Sub-Element Policy 2.5 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in
both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element
entries could elaborate on the figures.
The LOSS for parks and recreation facilities appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "G" above is one of
two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.1 in the
Recreation and Open Space Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary
redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and
a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location,
with Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 1.1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is
decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the crn could be formatted to provide the LOS
Standards, while the Element entries could elaborate on the figures. Additionally, the LOSS for
Regional Parks will be revised to the BCC directed 2.7 acres per I,OOO/population.
[Public Comments from Februarv 23, 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that special rural
standards should be developedfor land lying east ofCR 951, including development standards, roads,
dark sides, etc. Another, suggesting the County has failed to limit growth based on available
resources.]
{Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting minimum Levels of Service
Standards should be established for multi-model (and inter-model) needs (inc. public transit, park-n-
ride facilities, carpooling, self-propelled modes, and pathways); another, suggesting that the County
5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
adopt special rural road section standards, including non-urban standards for right-ofway cross-
sections, lighting, landscaping and water. ]
[Planning Commission (CCPe) Comment trom August 27, 2010 EAR WorkshoTJ - Supporting staff
suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the CIE, with the individual facilities' Elements or
Sub-Elements being revised to direct readers to the CIEfor this information.}
[Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment tram December 7. 2010 EAR AdoTJtion Hearing -
Recognizing FDOT comments to the DCA and the revisions involved.)
OBJECTIVE 2 (FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY):
Provide public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, in order to maintain adopted level of
service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, within the County's authority
to require others to provide, or as provided by the School District within their financially
feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, formally adopted by the School Board between
July 1 and October 1 each year. With the exception of public school facilities, existing public
facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated
with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and other intergovernmental revenues received
based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility
improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the fonn of,
but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees,
dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special
assessments and taxes.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The purpose of this Objective and its policies is to establish how providing public facilities in
accordance with Objective 1 above must be accomplished in a financially feasible manner. This
Objective is being achieved and should be retained as written.
Policy Relevance:
There are ten (10) policies within this Objective.
Policy 2.10:
Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to
bondable revenues from current sources of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation
on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal
management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad
valorem taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax.
The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and
are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy.
This Policy identifies current bondable revenues and limits the ratio of total debt service to bondable
revenues. This limitation may have lost relevance given the economic climate and government's
ability to react to market changes in a timely manner. The policy has been in the GMP since its
original adoption and based upon the direction given below the policy will not be modified.
6
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
[flanning Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUJ!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting this
Policy remains relevant and the County should not consider acijusting its debt service ratio.}
OBJECTIVE 3 (PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA):
Effective with plan implementation, limit public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area to
those facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, needed to support new development to the
extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Like all other types of capital improvements, projects located in the Coastal High hazard Area are
included in the County's Annual Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, and thus the County's
Annual Budget for each fiscal year. The above Objective contains an outdated timeframe reference,
but the wording is otherwise acceptable. This Objective should be reworded to remove the time frame
reference and simply refer to the 5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective.
Policy 3.1 :
The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the
replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element including, but not limited to arterial and collector roads, sanitary sewer
service - wastewater treabnent systems, potable water supply systems, surface water -
stormwater management systems, solid waste collection and disposal systems, natural
groundwater aquifer recharge areas, and park and recreation facilities.
This Policy establishes the County's ability to replace and maintain public facilities in the coastal high
hazard area in accordance with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. This Policy
remains relevant and should be retained except for changes associated with the renaming of certain
public facilities.
OBJECTIVE 4 (PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS):
Coordinate County land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital
improvements, as described in Policy 1.1 above, by providing needed capital improvements for
replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future
development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders.
Policy Relevance:
There are seven (7) policies within this Objective.
Policy 4.1 :
The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the
Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated
annually and may also be modified as follows:
7
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
A. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be
amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies,
developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities.
B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be
adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management
Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or
acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan.
This Policy provides for modifications to the Schedule of Capital Improvements of the Capital
Improvement Element. This Element is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which
were adopted into law in 2007, as follows:
163.3177(3)(b)1: Requires an annual update to the Five-Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements to be submitted by December 1, 2008 and yearly thereafter. If this date is
missed, no comprehensive plan amendments are allowed until the update is adopted. Ch.
2007-204, LOP.
This Policy remains otherwise relevant and should be retained as revised in accordance with the above
Statutory change.
Policy 4.6:
Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with
the Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element will be limited to
Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Figure PW-1 and Figure PW-1.1
"Collier County Water District Boundaries", and Figure PW-2 and Figure PW-2.1 "Existing and
Future Potable Water Service Areas", in the Potable Water Sub-Element of the Public Facilities
Element, and on Figure SS-1 and Figure SS-1.1, "Collier County Sewer District Boundaries",
and Figure SS-2 and Figure SS-2.1, "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas", in the Sanitary
Sewer Wastewater Treatment Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. Road and Public
School improvements will be provided as designated in their respective Schedule of Capital
Improvements appearing in this Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and
service types will be provided on a countywide availability basis.
This Policy limits the provision of public facilities to within specific service areas identified in other
Elements or Sub-Elements ofthe GMP or in accordance with the Schedule of Capital Improvements in
this Element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained except for changes associated with
the renaming of certain public facilities and their attendant Sub-Elements.as written.
Policy 4.7:
The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development
activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of
life, property, and re-building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and
technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not be limited to:
a. Construction above the flood plain;
b. Maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation;
c. Installation of on-site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency
connection points;
8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
d. Beach and dune restoration, re-nourishment, or emergency protective actions to
minimize the loss of structures from future events;
e. Emergency road repairs; and,
f. Repair and/or replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea
walls.
This Policy requires the County to adhere to best practices in providing public facilities. This Policy
remains relevant and should be retained as written.
[Planning Commission (CCPe) Comment from AUJ[ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that an
additional best practice entry should be included in the listing, such as "All governing construction
codes ".]
OBJECTIVE 5 (CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT):
Ensure that public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, and services needed to support
development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development
Policy Relevance:
There are six (6) policies within this Objective.
Policy 5.1:
The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treatment,
Drainage Stormwater Management and Solid Waste Disposal Level of Service Standards of this
Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if anyone of the following standards
of the Concurrency Management System is met:
A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development
plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or
B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site
development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or
C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development
agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An
enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development
agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or
development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement
must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the
development occur, pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes.
This Policy provides criteria for establishing concurrency specific to potable water, wastewater
treatment, stormwater management and solid waste disposal facilities and services. This Element may
be affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted into law in 2005, as
follows:
9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
163.3177(3)(a)5: Required the comprehensive plan to include a 5-year schedule of capital
improvements. Outside funding (i.e., from a developer, or other government or funding
pursuant to referendum) of these capital improvements must be guaranteed in the form of
a development agreement or interlocal agreement.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained except for changes associated with the renaming
of certain public facilities and their attendant Sub-Elements. Explicitly specifying an "interlocal
agreement" as the other source of outside funding for capital improvements mayor may not require
revision of this Element to be in compliance with the above Statutory change.
[Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggested that 'pathways' be added to
requirements for concurrency.]
10
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Transportation Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all
Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defmed below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with
"TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such
as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to
specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
Policy 3.3
Modification to state corridor width evaluated on a case by case basis.
Policy 3.4
Modifications to provide more flexibility in policy.
Policy 3.5
Policy 4.1
Revision to eliminate time frame for achieving policy.
Revision to be consistent with policy 4.3
Policy 4.6
Addition to policy to address HB697.
Policy 5.1
Revision to provide clarification and applicability of policy.
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
Modifications to provide expanded applicability of policy.
Revision to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with
Policy 5.5, HB697, and 8B360.
Policy 5.5
Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TOM strategies.
Policy 5.6
Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TOM strategies and
language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and
8B360.
Policy 5.8
Modification to improve effectiveness of policy.
1
Transportation Element Summary
Policy 5.9
Policy 63
Policy 6.5
Deletion based upon action accomplished.
Revisions to provide clarity to policy.
Revisions to update list of projects identified.
Policy 7.3
Modifications to expand applicability of policy.
Policy 7.4
Modifications to recognize the requirement to implement HB697.
Policy 7.5
Policy 93
Revision to recognize on-going efforts of the policy.
Revision to provide clarity of policy.
Policy 11.2
Revision to require the BCC review and approve the requested Airport
Authority Master Plan
Policy 12.8
Deletion based upon transit systems exempt from concurrency.
Objective 13.
The County shall evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element in the
Growth Management Plan.
2
Transportation Element Summary
Brief Assessment of Successes & Shortcomings for the Transportation Element
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose ofthe Transportation Element, as stated in its Goal, is "To plan for, develop and operate
a safe, efficient, and cost effective transportation system that provides for both the motorized and non-
motorized movement of people and goods throughout Collier County." In order to accomplish this goal,
the Transportation Element incorporates data and recommendations from the following reports, plans and
studies:
.:. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) currently adopted Long Range
Transportation Plan 2030 Financially Feasible Plan and 2030 Needs Plan.
.:. MPO Urban Area Transportation Study.
.:. Collier County Transportation Work Program, FY 2010 - FY 2014.
.:. 2030 Traffic Circulation Map.
.:. Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan.
.:. Airport Master Plans for Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island
Executive Airport.
.:. Public Transportation Development Plan.
.:. Collier County Master Mobility Plan.
The Transportation Element is closely linked to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The land
development pattern, as outlined in the FLUE, necessitates improvements and expansion to the County's
transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in land use
patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for this reason that the
County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DR!, PUD, other rezone, and conditional use
requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and
submitted to the appropriate County review agencies.
As an alternative to this scenario of the transportation system reacting to new demands created by
changes to land development patterns, the County has begun to explore ways to allow the roadway system
to guide the patterns and densities of future land development. The County can determine the type of
roadway system it wishes to maintain at some adopted level of service and then can take steps to permit
only the types, intensities and location of land uses that will be consistent with that system. Through use
of this "checkbook concurrency" process, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for
transportation services from outstripping the capacity of the roadway system.
As part of the Transportation Element, the County has established minimum acceptable level of
service standards for the existing County Road system. For County facilities, the level of service standard
1
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing
to be maintained is either "0" or "E," as measured on a peak hour basis. Several State facilities have been
given a minimum LOS "E" standard. In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County
has implemented a "real time" "checkbook accounting" concurrency management process.
B. Objectives Analysis:
As currently formatted, this Element consists entirely of a Goal (Goal I), Objectives and Policies. As
part of the EAR-based amendments, formatting changes consisting of the addition of a brief introductory
statement for the Element and removal of the "1" from the Goal will transpire, so that it is simply the
Goal of the Element
C. Objectives:
Objective 1 - The County will maintain the major roadway system at an acceptable Level of
Service by implementing improvements as identified in the Annual Update and Inventory Report
(AUIR) or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed
improvements to their facilities.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
This Objective requires the County to adopt and maintain Level of Service (LOS)
standards for the County Roadway System, to annually review and adjust such standards, and to
coordinate County road improvements with the road improvement programs operated by
neighboring jurisdictions. The tasks included within this Objective are ongoing through
implementation of projects from the 5-year work program as identified by the projected
deficiencies table included in the AUIR. Therefore, this Objective will be retained as written
Objective 2 - The County shall maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for
in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified in the Five (5) Year Work Program.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The County demonstrates its success in maintaining adopted Levels of Service through
data provided in the AUIR. This Objective also incorporates the County's Five-Year Work
Program into the Transportation Element. It has been left without a date reference so as to be
able to incorporate the Five-Year Work Program current at any time. This Objective will be
retained as currently written.
Objective 3 - The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future
rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program
and/or the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range
Transportation Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
This Objective calls for the preservation of right-of-way for ongoing and future road
improvements. This Objective is sufficiently generic that it allows the County Transportation
2
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
Division to protect and acquire rights-of-way as an ongoing program. This IS pending
incorporation into the LDC. This Objective will be retained as currently written.
Policy 3.3 - The County shall acquire a sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate
arterial and collector roads of no less than a cross section of six (6) traffic lanes,
appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, a
shoulder sufficient for pull offs, and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way
standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity
analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Through use of the LRTP and 5-year work program roadway corridors necessary to
support the future needs are identified and programmed for funding. Utilization of the
LRTP helps to determine if a future ROW width of less than that required to support 6
lanes is an appropriate option. This policy will be retained as written. Since the horizon
year used in each update of the LRTP is not the expected build-out of Collier County,
staff recommends that this policy be retained and corridor width be reevaluated on a case
by case basis and not be based solely on the needs limited by the LRTP.
Planninf! Commission (CCPe) Comment trom August 25,2010 EAR Workshop - replace "of no
less than a cross section of six (6) traffic lanes" with "as appropriate to meet the needs of the
LRTP ".
Policy 3.4 - Collier County shall acquire rights-ot-way for transportation improvements in
tee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County
Commissioners based upon a recommendation from the Transportation Administrator.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This acquisition language doesn't just apply to lands we condemn or purchase, but also
needs to better apply to lands granted or gifted to us. The GMP needs to allow for public
access easements, rights-of-way, etc. that are granted without forcing these facilities to be
obtained in fee simple, Collier County recommends revising "acquire" to "purchase" and
recommends deletion of "based upon a recommendation from the Transportation
Administrator."
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom August 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - remove
"based upon a recommendation from the Transportation Administrator" from the end of
the existing policy.
3
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing
Policy 3.5 - Within one year of the effective date of this amendment, the County shall
prepare and adopt a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land
development regulations
Policv Achievement Analvsis:
The County is working towards adoption of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan
(TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations. Suggestions include omitting the
"within one year" requirement, and simply state that the County is implementing a TCPP.
Collier County recommends revisions to this policy.
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - The CCPC
would like a time frame for accomplishing the policy and not to leave it open ended.
Objective 4 - The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians
and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive
Pathways Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
The stated purpose of the County's Comprehensive Pathway Plan is to promote walking
and bicycling as integral components of Collier County's local, regional and state recreation and
transportation programs. That having been stated, the Program is responsible for maintaining
and extending the County's bike lanes, sidewalks, and recreational paths. The program has been
active for approximately ten (10) years, and relies on a Pathways Advisory Committee to make
recommendations as to potential projects, priorities and even Planned Unit Development
Applications. Additionally, the comprehensive pathways plan; which outlines goals, objectives
and policies, and prioritizes pathway projects, has undergone recent updates. This Objective
should be retained as written.
Policy 4.1 - The County shall incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways
Plan into this Transportation Element by reference and shall periodically update the
Pathways Plan as needed.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains to be modified
as suggested by the CCPC below.
The County has incorporated the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into this
Transportation Element by reference and shall periodically update the Pathways Plan as
needed.
Planninf! Commission (CCPe) Comment from AUf!Ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Replace
"shall" with "should to be consistent with policy 4.3.
4
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
Policy 4.5 - The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal
funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work
Program.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text to be modified as
suggested by the CCPC below.
The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and
provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work Program.
Collier County Transportation Planning secures millions of dollars in funding every year
from agencies as identified in this policy.
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Remove "to
the greatest extent possible" from the policy.
Policy 4.6 - The County shall work to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse
Gas Emission bv providina for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through
implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards
ordinances and shall incorporate bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed
appropriate, in new construction and reconstruction of roadways.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
The County provides for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through
implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances
and incorporates bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in all new
construction and reconstruction of roadways. Staff recommends that this policy be
modified to include_consideration ofHB697.
Objective 5 - The County shall coordinate the Transportation System development process with
the Future Land Use Map.
Objective Achievement Analvsis:
Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff regularly coordinates with Transportation
Planning staff on transportation considerations related to proposed GMP Amendments. The two
staffs work together annually with regard to the County's Annual Update & Inventory Reports
(AUIRs). During the past three years, the staffs have worked together on the amendments
establishing the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE, the update of the Golden Gate
Area Master Plan, the update of the lmmokalee Area Master Plan (ongoing), the proposed
extension of Wilson Boulevard into the Rural Fringe Area, and the establishment of the County's
checkbook concurrency provisions. The County has acted consistent with this Objective.
Therefore, the Objective should be retained as written.
Policy 5.1 - The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation
applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land
5
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible
development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation
system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a
deficient roadway segment or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient,
or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is
currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service
Standard within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are
also approved.
Policv Achievement Analvsis:
Additional language that clarifies "significantly impacted road segment" in regards to the
County adopted 2%-2%-3%, and which clarifies "deficient" should be added to this
policy. It is also recommend that language establishing what "mitigation" is, and
specifically how it should be applied (in measurable terms) be added. It should also detail
what happens when mitigation allows a project to be "consistent" with this policy. Collier
County recommends revisions.
Policy 5.3 -In order to determine vesting, where desired, all previously approved
projects must go through a vesting review pursuant to Subsection 10.02.07.8.6, of the
Land Development Code.
Policv Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 5.3 requires the County to conduct a Traffic Impact Vesting Affirmation Review
to determine which developments are vested for concurrency, the schedule of when these
developments will be built and the magnitude of traffic that will be generated by these
developments. This review was completed, and information from the review was used to
provide background data and analysis relative to the County's Transportation
Concurrency Management Area and Concurrency Exception Area amendments. Collier
County recommends revisions. Consider allowing the County the ability to provide
vesting determinations on projects that are under review and that are beyond the build-out
date stated in their TIS.
Policy 5.4 - Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida Administrative Code and the
Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use
Element of this Plan, the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area
(TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA
(MapTR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as
impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the set procedures.
Policv Achievement Analvsis:
Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban rnfilI and
Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan,
6
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from
transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system
are mitigated using the set procedures. Staff recommends that this policy be modified to
include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and SB360.
Policy 5.5 - Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to
obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide
certification from the Transportation Planning Department that at least four
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County recommends revisions - Commercial developments within the South U.S.
41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for
transportation must provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department that
at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized.
Monitoring of the use of the TDM strategies must be included in the annual monitoring
report and modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three
years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Staff recommends that this policy be
modified to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with HB697 and SB360.
Policy 5.6 - The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management
Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and
connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel
paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured
based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation
Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas are designated: Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the
Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the
east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side
(Map TR-5). East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the
north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and;
Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR-6).
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County recommends revisions - Commercial developments within the TCMA
must provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department that at least four
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized. Monitoring of
the use of the TDM strategies must be included in the annual monitoring report and
modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three years of
development if they are deemed ineffective. Staff recommends that this policy be
modified to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697,
and SB360.
7
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing
Policy 5.8 - Should the TIS for a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a
constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA by more than a
de minimis amount (more than 1 % of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS),
yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7
of this Element, a congestion mitigation payment shall be required
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County recommends revisions - these needs to refer to an annually updated map that
dermes what the County's recognized hurricane evacuation links are, so the failing ones can be
identified. That map MUST be directly related to the ADIR to make this effective. Congestion
Mitigation Payment needs to be defined much more clearly.
(NEW) Policy 5.9 - Local governments shall adopt by December 1, 2006 a method for
assessing proportionate fair-share mitigation options.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County recommends deleting this policy - this has been completed and follows
the model developed by FDOT as required by December 1,2005. The process is clearly
outlined in the County's TIS guidelines.
Objective 6 - The County shall coordinate the transportation element with the plans and
programs of the state, region, and other local jurisdictions.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective requires the Collier County Transportation Division to coordinate with the
transportation programs of other governmental entities. Collier County Transportation staff
coordinates with transportation planning and improvement programs implemented by
municipalities, neighboring counties, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, the
Florida Department of Transportation, and the Federal Highway Administration, and will
continue to do so. This Objective will be retained as written.
Policy 6.3 - The Transportation Element shall be consistent in its interface into the
arterial/collector system within the City of Naples, Everglades City and the City of Marco
Island.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 6.3 requires the County to "be consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system
within the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island." The Policy has to do with establishing
and maintaining connections between County and City roads. However, the original intent of this
Policy is unclear. For instance, it could apply to the roadway connections themselves, or it could
apply to administrative policies or guidelines. The EAR-based amendments should include
modification of this policy for clarity.
8
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
Policy 6.5 - The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need
for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a grade separated overpass at
Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The above projects are now in the MPO
Transportation Improvement Program along with the six-Ianing of Golden Gate Parkway.
The County shall insure that the three projects mentioned above will be fully coordinated
in timing and design.
Policv Achievement Analvsis:
The projects listed in this policy have been completed and renders this policy obsolete. Collier
County recommends revision of the projects listed to include; 1-75/Everglades Interchange; US-
41/SR-CR951 grade separated overpass; and Randall/Immokalee grade separated overpass.
(NEW)Policy 6.6 - Collier County shall encourage emergency egress be permitted at all
temporary access facilities.
Objective 7 - The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and
egress to adjoining properties, and shall encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic
circulation through the development review process.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
This Objective requires the County to develop and adopt standards for onsite and external
traffic circulation as part of the development review process. The County has adopted such
standards and they are applied to rezoning applications and site development permitting for all
proposed development within Collier County. This Objective will be retained as written.
Policy 7.3 - The County shall implement, through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of
safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for both
motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review of Planned
Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in
the land development application review process.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.3 requires the County to implement "the provision of safe and convenient on-site
traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles
as a primary objective in the review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development
Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development applications
process." Such provisions have been adopted through the County's Zoning Code and are
periodically reviewed and updated consistent with established transportation planning
criteria. This Policy should be revised to include coordination with County Engineering
staff where traffic circulation is outside of the limits of the public ROW.
PlanninJ! Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 25. 2010 EAR WorkshofJ - Replace the
word "shall" with "may" at the beginning of the policy.
9
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
Policy 7.4 - The County shall develop corridor management plans that take into
consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive
development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take
into account the recommendations of the Community Character Plan, County-sponsored
Smart Growth initiatives, and the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County Commissioners may periodically
appropriate funding for these plans.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 7.4 requires the County to develop Corridor Management Plans for certain
roadways. There is a similar requirement within the Future Land Use Element (see
Section ISH of this report). The FLUE provision lists corridors that could be subject to
such plans. Collier County recommends amending this to underline the importance of the
'smart growth' portion ofthe policy (i.e. direct the County to adopt and implement smart
growth policies). Also to require that any developments that are approved must meet
smart growth objectives. Suggest coming up with a list of them, similar to the TOM
strategies above.
Policy 7.5 - The County shall develop Corridor Access Management Plans. Such plans
shall be designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements,
including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance
safety. The development of such plans shall consider the impacts of the South US 41
Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs), as may be appropriate.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 7.5 requires the development of Corridor Access Management Plans. Such a plan
has been implemented. An EAR-based amendment should include modification of this
Policy by changing the first sentence to read "The County has developed and shall
continue to effectively implement a Corridor Access Management Policy."
Objective 8 - The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management System"
for the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
Sections 2.2 through 2.4 of this report review issues related to Transportation Concurrency
Management. Prior to 2003, County staff reviewed all PUD and DR! Applications for compliance with
transportation concurrency provisions. As part of the review process, proposed projects were assessed for
their transportation impacts and mitigation requirements were assigned to these projects on a case-by-case
basis. This system was adequate for evaluating individual projects but did not adequately assess the
combined impact of all development on the County's road system.
10
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
During 2003, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a "checkbook concurrency system."
This system examines the total trip capacity available for new development and includes provisions
relative to vested traffic. As part of the process of establishing the checkbook concurrency system, the
County has recently adopted amendments to the Transportation Element, Future Land Use Element and
Capital Improvement Element that establish two Transportation Concurrency Management Areas
(TCMAs) and a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). This Objective will be retained as
written.
Objective 9 - The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and
maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and
motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the
implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In
developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions, the NTMP shall consider the
impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems (from a
level-of-service and operational standpoint).
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective was adopted in November 2002. It essentially established a program of
neighborhood traffic calming measures that can be implemented by a public petition process
(from affected residents to the Board of County Commissioners). It has successfully slowed
traffic in certain portions of the County where neighborhood streets were being used as "cut-
throughs" between two major roadways, This Objective will be retained as written.
Policy 9.3 - The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local
streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road
network. The Collier County Transportation Division shall develop guidelines, which
identify the conditions that would require the interconnection of two neighboring
developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection
of such local streets.
Policv Achievement Analysis:
This Policy needs to better define the term "feasible". Also, policies in Objective 70fthe
GMP, not including the Transportation Element, addresses interconnection and should be
defined in relation to Policy 9.3.
Objective 10 - The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective is a catchall for County transportation programs that operate within
Collier County's rural areas. As such the Objective is intended to cover policies that deal with a
range of different transportation tasks. Staff recommends that this Objective be revised to read
"The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public that remains
consistent with the character of the rural areas of Collier County".
11
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
Objective 11 - The County shall maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient,
safe, and environmentally compatible facilities, consistent with the approved Airport Master Plan
for each Airport.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
Collier County owns and operates three (3) airports: Immokalee Regional Airport, in
Immokalee; Everglades Airpark, in Everglades City; and Marco Island Executive Airport,
located three miles north of the City of Marco Island in southwestern Collier County. Each of
the airports is required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to prepare and periodically
update an Airport Master Plan that details facility needs and proposed expansions or changes for
each airport. The purpose of the above Objective is to incorporate (by reference) these Airport
Master Plans into the Transportation Element. This Objective will be retained as written.
Policy 11.2 - The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective
and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport
master plans.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 11.2 gives the Collier County Airport Authority responsibility for future facility
planning, consistent with the Airport Master Plans. Staff recommends that this policy be
revised to require the BOCC review and approve the requested Airport Authority Master
Plan.
PlanninJ! Commission (CCPe) Comment from AUJ!Ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Replace
"Collier County Airport Authority" with "Collier County Board of County Commissioners".
The Airport Authority only makes recommendations to the Board.
Policy 11.3 - The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has
assisted Everglades City in obtaining Federal funds to enable the City to maintain and
operate the Everglades Air Park. Given the assistance provided to Everglades City by
the MPO, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall coordinate with the
Everglades City Council to ensure a safe and orderly transfer of the Everglades Airpark
and all related facilities to Everglades City for use as a public airport only. Such transfer
shall be in a manner that does not compromise the safety of the Airpark and the future
facility plans authorized by the Everglades Airpark Master Plan. In the event the Airpark
ceases operation or ceases to operate as a public Airpark, the Airpark property will
revert back to Collier County. Conditions of a transfer and reverter provisions will be set
forth in a transfer document or the deed for transfer.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains due to transfer
of Everglades Airpark has not transpired, but discussions between the County and
Everglades City is still in-progress.
12
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
PlanninR Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - The CCPC
would like staff to check on the status of the transfer and the results will dictate how the policy is
modified.
Objective 12 - The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the
future.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
This Objective is the location for all policies related to planning, operation, coordination
and expansion of the Collier Area Transit (CAT) System. The CAT System is administered
through the County's Traffic Operations & Alternative Transportation Modes Department with
the aid of other Departments within the County's Transportation Administration (see the policies
below). The CAT System began operation in February 2001 and in its first twelve months of
service, provided over 211,000 passenger trips, Ridership has grown since that time. Therefore,
this Objective will be retained as written.
Policy 12.8 - Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of
service standard for transit facilities.
Policy Achievement Analvsis:
Policy 12.8 requires the transit development plan to include "an acceptable level of
service standard for transit facilities." The adopted plan does include several such levels
of service standards, to be used as indicators of the effectiveness and efficiency of the
County Transit System. Additionally, staff notes that Section 163.3180 (4) (b), Florida
Statutes, was amended in 2001 to exempt transit systems from concurrency. Therefore,
staff recommends that the EAR-based amendments include deletion of this Policy.
Obiective 13 - The County shall evaluate the creation of a seoarate Transit Element in the
Growth Manaaement Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
This proposed new Objective shall evaluate and take into consideration the expansion of
multi-modal transportation systems. This objective shall create a set of policies that are
consistent with increased use of alternative modes of transportation, appropriate mitigation for
development creating significant impacts to the transportation network, and full consistency with
the goals and objectives ofHB697.
Planning Commission (CCPe) Comment from August 25. 2010 EAR Workshoo - Develop a
policy that states the County shall develop a Mobility Element to the GMP based upon the
conclusion of the Master Mobility Plan to give alternative means of transportation an equal
footing within the GMP.
13
Transportation Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Public Facilities Element - Sanitarv Sewer Sub-Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper
formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defmed below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning
with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal( s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction,
such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow
Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote...", "The County shall continue to..," or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
To be renamed, including Sub-Element, Goal and throughout Objectives and Policies
Objective 1 - minor revisions to provide new departmental references; reformatting
Policy 1.1 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 1.3 -- consider revision to set new review and reporting requirements.
Policy 1.4 - may need an updated Ordinance cite.
Policy 1.5 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 1.7 - minor revision to provide updated Ordinance cite.
Objective 2 - reformatting.
Policy 2.1 - minor revisions to reconcile figures and be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the
Plan; part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy.
Policy 2.4 - minor revision to reference earlier Policy.
Objective 3 - reformatting.
1
SANITARY SEWER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 3.1 -- revise/augment to introduce new Policy regarding private wastewater facilities.
Objective 4 - reformatting.
Policy 4.7 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Objective 5 - consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in
demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions; reformatting.
Policy 5.3 - minor revision to provide new agency reference; may need an updated/clearer Policy
cite,
Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element - Attached Documents - Numerous changes, with direction to cross-
check GMP locations where similar references to maps & figures are found.
- Additional changes to Figure SS-l and related Figures to reflect District boundary changes
associated with RFMUD Sending Lands boundary adjustments - two main areas; 1 on south side
of Immokalee Road.
2
SANITARY SEWER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Public Facilities Element - Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as
follows:
TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE SANITARY SEWER
FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
The intent of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element is to assure the provision of efficient and economical
services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for wastewater
management while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in
Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The provision of public facilities and services for
wastewater treatment is planned in correlation with future land use projections.
The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008
included the initial step toward re-naming of this Sub-Element from the "Sanitary Sewer" Sub-Element
to the "Wastewater Treatment" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all titles, headings
and text within this Sub-Element, and in all references to this Sub-Element found throughout the
Growth Management Plan.
As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting
Objectives and Policies. As part of the EAR-based amendments, Comprehensive Planning staff is
recommending specific formatting changes for the Sub-Element. In addition, the Sub-Element
contains a number of references to the County's Water & Sewer District. The District's official name
is the "Collier County Water-Sewer District", and the Sub-Element text needs to reflect this.
B. Objectives Analysis:
OBJECTIVE 1:
The County will implement the following policies to make certain that public and private sector
sanitary sewer service utilities provide, repair and/or replace sanitary sewer collection,
treabnent and disposal facilities to correct existing deficiencies in their respective service
areas, as may be required to meet or exceed the Level of Service Standards established in this
Plan. In addition, public sector sanitary sewer service utilities will be expanded as necessary
to provide for future growth.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective concerns both private and public utilities. Collier County s private water and
wastewater utilities are regulated through the Utility/Franchise Regulation Section of the Community
Development & Environmental Services (CDES) Operations Department. This agency serves as staff
for the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority. The Utility/Franchise Regulation Section is
the County entity responsible for monitoring compliance with County regulations by private utilities.
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
In addition to managing the operations of the Department and Section, the CDES Operations Director
is also the Executive Director for the Water and Wastewater Authority.
In regulating the operations of the County s private utilities the Authority, which is appointed by the
Board of County Commissioners, exercises considerable power. They may set rates, adjust franchise
boundaries, set quality of service standards and intervene in disputes between utilities and customers.
The publicly owned (as opposed to privately-owned) wastewater collection system is operated by
Collier County through the Collier County Water-Sewer District. The District is responsible for
developing, operating and maintaining the County s public facilities related to wastewater treatment
and collection.
Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written.
This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective" and specific references
to County Departments and Sections should reflect CDES' recent reorganization, including the
Operations and Regulatory Management Department [and Director], of the Growth Management
Division.
Policy Relevance:
There are seven (7) policies within this Objective.
Policy 1.1:
Continue the development of the Collier County Water-Sewer District consistent with the
Capital Improvements Element to provide for future growth.
This Policy calls for the continuing development of the County's Water-Sewer District. This Policy
remains relevant and should be rewritten not to be utility specific, but to mention those jurisdictions,
generally, that have a wastewater treatment or sewer district or service to develop consistent with the
GMP.
Policy 1.3:
The Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority (Authority), established by County
Ordinance Number 96-6, regulates the operations of private sector wastewater treatment
utilities that provide sanitary sewer services to portions of unincorporated Collier County. All
such private sector sanitary sewer service providers are required to meet the County's
adopted wastewater treatment Level of Service (LOS). All private sector sanitary sewer service
providers shall file an annual statement with the Authority that provides current operating
infonnation including, but not limited to: a statement of current policies and service criteria,
the LOS maintained by the service provider and whether such level of service meets the
County's LOS Standard for wastewater treatment. The annual report shall also document any
necessary or projected facility expansion and/or replacement projects that are required to
correct observed deficiencies.
This Policy requires, to the extent of County authority, private wastewater treatment utilities to report
current operating information and proposed system expansions or modifications to the County,
including a statement as to how the proposed activity is consistent with the County's Growth
Management Plan. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
[Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUJ!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshol1 - Suggesting that
meeting these requirements should come at no cost to the County. The CCPC also suggests
considering a combination of I-year reporting, and 5-year reviewing, requirements.}
Policy 1.4:
For any new structure in which plumbing fixtures are to be installed and which is proposed to
be connected to a private sector sanitary sewer service utility, the developer is required to
provide a letter of adequate capacity from that private utility to the Collier County Building
Review and Permitting Department at the time of application for the first building permit,
pursuant to Collier County Ordinance Number 80-112.
This Policy requires developers intending to connect to private wastewater treatment or sanitary sewer
facilities to demonstrate such facilities will provide them with adequate capacity, This Policy remains
relevant and should be retained as written.
Policy 1.5:
Collier County shall permit development of package sewage treatment plant systems in areas
identified in Policy 1.2, on an interim basis until County service is available. The County shall
allow individual septic systems within the County only when connection to an existing central
system is not within 200 lineal feet of the closest property line. In portions of the County
where septic systems are allowed, at such time as County or other central sewer service
becomes available within 200 lineal feet of the property line, said septic systems will be
required to connect to the appropriate central sanitary sewer system.
Within the Rural Lands Stewardship Overlay, consistent with Policy 1.2: septic systems are
permitted within Hamlets; septic systems mayor may not be permitted in Compact Rural
Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size depending upon the permitted uses in
the Compact Rural Development; and, septic systems are not permitted in Towns, Villages,
and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size.
However, in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one
hundred (100) acres in size, septic systems are allowed to serve no more than 100 acres, on an
interim basis only, until central service is available.
This Policy allows development of new or expanded wastewater treatment and sanitary sewer systems
in certain portions of unincorporated Collier County on an interim basis. It also allows the use of
individual septic systems in areas where County or other central wastewater treatment service is
unavailable. This Policy remains relevant but should be revised to replace "until County water service
is available" with "until a centralized wastewater treatment system service is available". This
includes mapping changes and new map information derived from the private, or smaller, providers or
districts.
Policy 1.7:
Where Community Development Districts, or similar special districts are established to provide
a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the
Collier County Water-Sewer District, sewer service shall be connected to the regional system,
and all facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water-Sewer
District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance Number 01-
57, adopted October 23, 2001, and District construction and operating policies.
This Policy requires Community Development Districts, or other special infrastructure districts, to
connect to the County Utility System when they are located within the Collier County Water-Sewer
3
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
District Service Area, and remains relevant. An Ordinance cite is outdated and this Policy should be
revised to replace "Ordinance Number 01-57, adopted October 23, 2001" with "Ordinance Number
04-31, adopted May 11,2004".
OBJECTIVE 2:
No development order shall be issued by Collier County without sanitary sewer facility
capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum level of Service Standards established herein is
available or will be available to serve the development under the guidelines established for
concurrency in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective is the County's concurrency provision for wastewater treatment capacity. The Collier
County Water-Sewer District achieves concurrency of its stated LOS standard. The disclosure of this
achievement is reported within the periodic updates of the County's Wastewater Master Plan, This
Objective is being achieved and should be retained, only if rewritten. This Objective should be
reformatted to separate the portion that reads as an "objective" from the portion that reads as a "policy"
into the individual "Objective 2" and Policy "2.0.1".
Policy Relevance:
There are four (4) policies within this Objective.
Policy 2.1 :
The following level of Service (lOS) standards are hereby adopted and shall be used as the
basis for detennining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a
development:
FACILITY SERVICE AREA
lEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD
Collier County Facilities
North Sewer Service Area
South Sewer Service Area
Southeast Sewer Service Area
Northeast Sewer Service Area
145 gpcd
100 gpcd
120 gpcd
120 gpcd
Marco Island Sewer District
Marco Shores
100 gpcd
City of Naples Facilities
Unincorporated Service Area
145 gpcd
Everglades City Facilities
Unincorporated Service Area
100 gpcd
Independent Districts
Orangetree Utilities
Immokalee Water and Sewer District
Florida Governmental Utility Authority
100 gpcd
100 gpcd
100 gpcd
4
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
Private Sector Systems *
* The standards hereby adopted are the sewage flow design standards in Chapter 64E-6008,
Florida Administrative Code, unless otherwise approved by the Board of County
Commissioners to address economic, social and construction method variations between
individual systems.
This Policy establishes Level of Service (LOS) standards for various Collier County wastewater
treatment facilities, both public and private. This Policy should be revised to update the Level of
Service Standards, as the Collier County Facilities North Sewer Service Area LOSS is now 120 gpcd
The Policy should be revised to indicate the LOS standard for Ave Maria Water and Wastewater
facilities, which are inside the County.
The LOSS for wastewater treatment appearing in Policy 2.1 above is one of two locations within this
GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5, subsection "E" in the Capital
Improvement Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that
the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location
selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE
could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the
figures. This Policy will remain relevant in its reconciled format.
(flanninf! Commission (CCPe) Comment from AUf!ust 27, 2010 EAR WorkshoTJ - Supporting staff
suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the CIE, with this Sub-Element being revised to
direct readers to the CIE for this information.)
Policy 2.4:
The County shall annually review historical sanitary sewer demand records and adjust the LOS
standards, as referenced in Policy 2.1, if so indicated by said annual review.
This Policy remains relevant and requires an annual review of wastewater treatment demand records,
with adjustment of the LOS Standards, as necessary, based upon the findings of the annual review.
This Policy should be revised to replace "County" with "Collier County Water and Wastewater
Authority", and add a second sentence, such as, "The Collier County Water-Sewer District shall
review historical sanitary sewer demand records during Collier County Wastewater Master Plan
updates and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 2.1, if needed." and retained as
rewritten.
OBJECTIVE 3:
The County will continue to ensure utilization of environmentally sound and economically
beneficial methods for disposal of treated sludge and septage, and shall also ensure that such
practices are followed by private utilities regulated by the County.
5
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective ensures the County will employ appropriate sludge and septage disposal practices
involving both public and private services. This Objective is being achieved and as such, it should be
retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an
"objective".
Policy Relevance:
Policy 3.1 :
The County shall maintain sludge de-watering and stabilization facilities for use by County
wastewater treatment operations to produce sludge de-watered and stabilized to a degree
suitable for use as cover material for County landfills or to be used for any suitable manner
that is pennitted by law. The County shall ensure that private wastewater utilities regulated by
the County follow such practices.
This Policy remains relevant and requires sludge de-watering and stabilization facilities to be included
in all County wastewater treatment plants. The facilities are required to produce sludge de-watered
and stabilized to a degree suitable to enable its use as cover material for County landfills or to be used
for any suitable manner that is permitted by law. The stabilization facilities at the North County Water
Reclamation Facility were abandoned in 1999 due to odor concerns. The County currently hauls
biosolids to a sanitary landfill on an interim basis until biosolid stabilization facilities can be obtained
to meet FAC Chapter 62-640 and USEPA 40 CFR Part 503. This Policy should be retained as written.
As part of the EAR-based amendments, the County proposes a new Policy requiring private sludge and
septage to be treated prior to its disposal to a degree equivalent to that employed at the County
facilities.
OBJECTIVE 4:
The County will continue to promote the use of treated wastewater effluent for irrigation
purposes in order to provide an environmentally sound disposal method and to conserve
potable water and groundwater supplies by developing and implementing an integrated,
comprehensive strategy for the following Policies.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective is being achieved and commits the County to promoting the use of reclaimed water as
an irrigation source for suitable properties. This language is similar to language contained in Objective
1.4 of the Potable Water Sub-Element (refer to the Potable Water Section of this Report). The County
has an active reclaimed water irrigation program. Therefore staff recommends retention of this
Objective, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an
"objective" .
Policy Relevance:
There are seven (7) policies within this Objective. The Objective and policies are similar to Objective
4 and its policies within the Potable Water Sub-Element (refer to the Potable Water Section of this
Report).
6
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
Policy 4.7:
The County shall seek to expand the availability of irrigation water from supplemental sources
through connection of such sources to the County's reclaimed water system.
This Policy remains relevant and requires that dual water systems within Community Development
Districts, other special districts, and Planned Unit Developments be connected to the Regional
(County) system, at such time as the system is available for such connection. This Policy should be
deleted or rewritten to not be utility specific.
OBJECTIVE 5:
The County will discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector sanitary sewer
service suppliers in an effort to maximize the use of existing public facilities through the
development order approval process by implementing the following policies.
Objective Achievement Analvsis:
This Objective is being achieved and seeks to discourage urban sprawl through maximization of
existing public wastewater treatment utilities. Further, the Objective states that this action will be
achieved through the local development review process. The Public Utilities Engineering Department
coordinates with the Zoning & Land Development Review Department in the review of development
order applications to ensure that the requirements of this Objective are met. Therefore, this Objective
should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its
formatting as an "objective".
Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing GHG emissions
in furtherance of HB 697.
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective. The Objective and policies are similar to Objective 5
and its policies within the Potable Water Sub-Element (refer to the Potable Water Section of this
Report).
Policy 5.3:
As provided for in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, and in Policy 1.2, central sewer
facilities are permitted in Towns, Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments.
Though not anticipated, it is possible that central sanitary sewer collection lines may extend
through lands not designated as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development; no
properties designated other than as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development
are permitted to connect to these collection lines. Under criteria, properties may be eligible for
central sanitary sewer service from Collier County Utilities, or a private sector utility or
independent district, within the Receiving Areas identified in the Rural Transition Water and
Sewer District, depicted on the Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas map (Figure SS-2) of
the Sanitary Sewer Sub-element, subject to availability. Qualifying criteria shall be limited to
the requirements and incentives established in the Future Land Use and Conservation and
Coastal Management Elements of this Plan to obtain preservation standards established for
environmentally sensitive lands in the Sending Areas of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
Criteria for central sanitary sewer service eligibility may include, but are not limited to, plans
for development which utilize creative planning techniques such as clustering, density
blending, rural villages, and TORs from identified environmentally sensitive areas. Criteria for
7
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
eligibility may be amended and additional Sending and Receiving Lands may be designated in
the future. Central Sanitary Sewer collection lines, within the Rural Transition Water and
Sewer District, may extend through Sending Lands; however, no properties designated as
Sending Lands may connect to the collection lines.
This Policy remains relevant and contains the conditions for connection of development within the
RLSA and the Rural Fringe to a central sanitary sewer system. Specifically, the Policy states that "no
properties designated other than as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development" (within
the RLSA) are permitted to connect to a central sanitary sewer system. The Policy also states
conditions for connections within the Rural Transition Water & Sewer District (i.e., the County's Rural
Fringe Mixed Use District). This Policy should be revised to replace "Collier County Utilities" in the
third sentence with "Collier County Water-Sewer District".
CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR
POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF lIB 697.
[Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting the County should study
ideas to target GHG sources - beside transportation, to address a lack of energy efficient plans, to
address the need to plan for sea level rise.]
[Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 27. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that the
amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies following from the adoption of HB 697may
be misplaced and consideration for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address
multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location , and should be removed from the! as a
proposed revision.]
C. Attached Documents Analysis:
Figure SS-J.l Collier County Sewer District Boundaries
This map has the same title as Figure S8-1 and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies,
should be deleted.
Figure SS-l.l Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas
This map has the same title as Figure 8S-2 and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies,
should be deleted.
Figure SS-l Collier County Sewer District Boundaries
This map is referenced in multiple Policies and is wrong. The references to this map should be
changed to reference "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas" since the District Boundaries are
included. Additional changes relating to RFMUD Sending Lands boundary adjustments.
Figure SS-2 Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas
8
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
This map is referenced in the same Policies as Figure SS-1 and should be updated to the 2008
Wastewater Master Plan Figure 1-1 (attached). Recommend similar maps be added for other Sewer
Systems overseen by the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority.
Figure SS-3 North Sewer Service Area
This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and should be deleted.
Figure SS-1 South Sewer Service Area
This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and should be deleted.
Table SS-14 Capital Improvement Projects FY 2003-2007
This table is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is specific to the Collier County Water-
Sewer District. For those reasons, this table should be deleted.
Look for the "Attached Document Analysis" items above to appear in the Capital Improvement
Element as cross references, and revise or delete in manners similarly with above instructions
The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008
included the initial step toward re-naming of this Sub-Element from the "Sanitary Sewer" Sub-Element
to the "Wastewater Treatment" Sub-Element. The new name should be reflected in all figures and
tables within this Sub-Element, changing these designations from "SS" to "WT" or "WW" and in all
references to these documents found throughout the Growth Management Plan.
[planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from December 7, 2010 EAR Adootion Hearinf! -
Recognizing staff comments regarding further revisions to certain Figures associated with District
boundary adjustments.]
9
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT
Pages 10-12 Blank
Public Facilities Element—Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing
Legend
Collier County Sewer District Boundaries
Entity
FGCU Service Area
'o/A "?\
COlliER COUNTY SEWE'RDI~SlRrC:T'~Olr
> ' ~ . "'.../
South Area
Southeast Area
FIGURE SS-1.1
/
,l-
-~ Hrl
~ \
(fi '-.\
~..~m\: __..._
~ 1
I ..--'2:;
--. - GOLDEN GATE
"<;."',.,
\'J~
r,'.-'"
\~-
\~.
\'
\&;,
\.)
i
'" ;".
o!l'O
':.1 Z;;.
::< ....
~ 9
"" 0
t 0
o
~?
I :
- - i ,~--PINE RIDGE RD EXl
.
"
"-.
,)\.
,., .;p-;
County
<,.. ~
;'....c
~~:~h, ",'J., ~~
13
\tM~~ ?~~
Y:'_;~!f:,\
!
I
l--~._~- .-.- /
\
l /
~ /
.~-
~E
FIGURE 55-2.1
,
~
r
~
\.
'-,
"
\\'~. ~ _._-~
'.
0>.'_ ; \
,
!
~-~ Z Z
. -ii!\'5?
t- l ~~~
. ~ I!!
<, <( h
\1\ :ii U{
Ii ,,8
, 0
\'(. "
;z:
'"
X
_ 5
I-
'"
<5
;z:
:;
:;i
~-r- i.~
\\ I -
-.- _ ---- -\.
South Area
Southeast Area
-~ I
1--- "-PINE RIDGE RD EXT
i
--- - GOlDEN GATE
.
Legend
Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas
Entity
FGCU Service Area
County
EXISTING AND FUTURE~'i
14
I
t
...4
'Ul;!.o1y
t
~
~
;;
i---U:fZ.Nl
Ql"l'QI'.......
--~M.~
~~
~-.:
-
~~
~ COONr'f ~r
_ ..-u.' <VJ<
~ __41" 'l~'~""<!! t'1i~,..
. .. <
T
~~_.~_._~~ ~ ,., (
!': ~. (:
'~
z~
i
i
i
,
COLLIER COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Page 1 of 1
$$-1
~
't
Ii!
;;
"
n
\5
."......Y...H" HAM.... _
,...".nw~ ,....".,
http://www.colliergov.net/modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid= ] 2670
812120 10
.
..,.
~
l-.;.-...31_~
tno<.t......,.
"
-
crrt (}if IIl'llIUJi
--
tb,llDtM.1'f.t:tl'Y
.-.: -
--
--
aJIIfirMi[J1Iltt
-
--
~n
t:Il:I!llfNt~'"
...........
--
~-
1OW:t ~
.....-
~UIfT.<::K
It.1iA'!f~fIilIIlA
~
}1 ~~
I
i
!
cou.J[N' tDlJWf'1' ~I
~ ~ Pt.Nt
~. ~.j('; J..I'ff,~ an,o(!"
FrGURE 55-2
v.:u
Page I of I
$
"
.
~
..
I
!
..I
~I
I
.......y ....... ........... - I
0C'J't)0l1t 2002 !
EXI$TING AND FUTURE
16
http://www.colliergov.netimodules/ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid= 12669
8/2/2010
'"
I
Vl
Vl
?~'G
;~
~', !;
. U;.
Q ,
w
rr:
:::>
o
C
....*
Ld
:rU
1-><.(
O::o:;W
OWO::
Zl/l<.(
I
\w
I
s n,; i
~ Ii h~'Up a I
Ii "ill . i f ~ I !. i I
;1 ill. Ii i; IIII i S l ; ; II-
'!
"
I 1= II
I hi I!
I IIi ;
I ~~i H
17
http://www .colIiergov .net/modules/Show Document.aspx ?documentid= 12668
Page 1 of 1
z
.
.
Z
III
%
Q
Z
C
>-
.
.J
.
.
It
"
<(
w
cr::
<(
w
U
>
cr::
w
U)
cr::
w
5:
w
U)
I
l-
n::::
o
z
t-~.
t- z.......
~;z~3
"5~:l
~tL"''''
:l!...."'o
8ffi~~
"''''
i~5~
H~~
-'-
8/2/20] 0
-'<t
,
(f)
V1
g.: -4---=
-::>
S2
u>
;~!~
".'
~ '~
- .'"''
I:
- ~
~~~ i i
& . _ h d n q I &i ;
JH~ II ~ L! I ~ h ~ ~ n ! ~I d
18
http://www .colliergov .netJrnodules/ShowDocumentaspx?documentid= 12667
~ I
I.
II
~.~ n
l!t!11 ' I
1~1~1 ; i
.b -."
I~__- 111
Page 1 of 1
A
..l
.I
Z
.
.
z
<(
%
a
z
c
>-:
.:
.I
.
.
II
IS
<{
w
a:
<{
w
u
>
a:
w
(/)
a:
w
~
w
if)
I
i-
:.J
o
if)
,. ~
ffi~:7i
'" -' ~
o:Q..W
!$!"''''
oi5l!!
"'2::1
~~F
z<:;;:'
a~~
u_..
e:::;r;i?
81212010
Page 1 of 1
TABLE...,.
CAPn'AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Py 2003.2007
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
WASlEWATER AND REa..AIIIED WATER
GI8eIey and HanlMll'l LLC
0cIgber 2002
Pundfl'Vpe Project Project M.... o.crIpIIon
(A) No.
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
lEllIellng W........ 413 (Growth .....1iId) Prajecta
Compte1iOll 01 upenaIan 01118 exl8llng NCWRF 101m 8.5 to 13.6 MGO. Add 2 ...
41WO 73031 NCWRF 5 MGD ExpansIon clllll8IS, llI'I8 ... a..-an baIIn. llI'I8 ......... _. a rww c:hIIlrhI c:onl8C:l blcIg. &
tank, e ... b~ bIdg. IMdIcIDrl flIcIIly. .... dwatIImg IIIlp8ftIIDn. IIUIg8
l1lckener, odor can1nII, RDP .-.- & aUdge pumping Allan.
413IGD 73066 W____ Master Plan l1Ddat88 Annu8l UpddI ol-""lII8_ DI8n.
413IGD 73lJ74 I~"" ... Roed FM PRR to VBR I'M 110m PnI Ridaa Rl-.l to. VancledlII Roed
41WO 73078 NorWSoulh SeMr Interconnections WlIIt Intarcannect ,*-lICl/Il and IOUlh _1WI8mI.
4131GO 73077 NCWRF Flow Eaualization Flow Eaualzallon TanIcI81 NCWFlF.
4131GO 73lJ79 Mulw PumDIna 8lBIIDn-lmmoka1ee Roedl CR 951 New M....~ 8lalIOn 8llmrnoll8lee Rod'IIS1
413IGD 73085 VBR 18" FM - C.R. 951 to Loaan Blvd. Study, cIlIlkI't IIld CllIIItrIIC:Ila oIrwwl8" fon:e mah 110m C.A.1511D Loaan BMl.
413IGD 73086 C.R. 951 16' FM . Immok8lee Rd. to VaR Study, cIlIlIgn IIld CllIIItrIIC:Ila 01... 18" force mah 110m Immolc8lae ReI. 10
VancIlItb.a.ch Rl-.l.
4131GD 73088 Land AcquiAon for Bl080UeII F8dIity Pf8pare atudy oIlang-tIlrm biDICllIdI aIanI8lIVtla, dIIl8rmN IocaIlOn for bIOIaIdI
. .1Ild
Study, 08191 and canWuclIon oIa 16-tnch fon:e mah fRlm propoaed mulIIr pumping
413IGD 73131 Immokalee Road East 18" Force Main statiOn _ImmCllclllle Road and CR9511D r=. 0nInge T_ WRf'. TIlle farce
mUlto be ClOIl8tnIcted wIlh IInInolcalM Ro8d ~ to _In FV'03.
413/GD 73132 Eaal Sewer Interconnect Study, design and conIlNCIIOn 01 SanIa BarbIl8 &MI. force "*' Iram ...., Pwnp
SIatIan 313.00 10 V8IldeIbII8eadI Ad.
41WD 73150 East Sewer Interconnect Booster Station 08S91 and CDnIlIuCIcln 01 bocIItIr pUlllptlg Adan lor Sanla BaIIl8Ia BIvd.Il..clgna
BII'd. force fI\8iI.
41WO 73151 Master Pumo Station-Vanderbilt Beach Rd. ,. L.o.-n Blvd. 0tI8lgn and constndon 01... MI8W Pumll SIatIan lor Eul S- ~ ltanlClI.1eCt.
4131GD 73152 Master PIIfIlD SlalIon- Vanderbilt Beach Rd. & Uvlngston Rd. New Mastar PumPhll Sl8llDn
4131GD 73153 Master Pump StaIIon . Immokalee Rct. East ArlIe 'a' MPS to SlIrva N<Jo'-aI SaMce AnNI.
4131GD 73154 SCWRF Injection weus =~ ilslaI-.d cl8ep iljIeIan ... .t lie SCWRF 10 provlcIlI addIlIanII
4131GD 73155 New NEWAF - AcauiI'8 SIt8 PunIhue 147ac ... at 0nu10ll Tl'88lor'" 01 WRF end WTP.
S1udy. design and canauclIlln ola new 2.0 mgd WRF by 2008, an IIlqlllIlIiOn to 4.0
4131GO 73156 New NoI1he8St Water Redamation Facility mgd by 2010, and anllllPlIlIion to 6.0 mgd by 2016 (lIIC!*IdIbIe to 12 mgd) on 118
OIllllOll T_ PfOI*tY1011IPIIce the ellIe1hg 0nInge TIM plant and.."a poIenlIal.-
cuslDmars In NOfIIwut Service AnNI.
4131GO 73157 New SEWRF . Land Acqulsltlon Study ~ ol poSllbll .... for IDcaIIDn 01 up 10 10.5 mgd(mmdl) WRF In ScMheaat Servicll
A-.
4131GO 73158 \.Jp8\ze Lakewood FM to 16" SluCIy, dll8ign and conatruclIlIn oIa naw 16-tnch toree mati from Maler F'urnI*llI
S18lIon 3.0510 Muter PumD Bl8lIan 3.08 IUDCftdIno elllll1lna 12" farce matll.
4131GO 73166 PumpIng Station Upgrades UpgradH 10 aldllilg ..Itldlorw and punplng atatIone .. IllI8dIld to k8ep pace wlIh
afoWth.
4131GD 73167 GrowItl Plan lJDdate UpddI Sanllanl sewer SubeIlImen1to Growth tPlln
4131GD 73190 VBR 18" FM. IaIllndw8lk AelmbuI'Mll*'lt
4131GD 73195 MPS 3. 14 IN8DIes H-*-I New MutIIi~ SIatIan
413fGD 73925 MPS 1.04 New Muter-Pumr,m S18lIon 0r8nae B1oeaom 81 GoocIIde-Frank
413fGO 73945 Pumping SI8tlon ImprovllllMlllts ~ to ellIe1hg....... and pumping stlIIlons _.-led to k8ep pace wit
lllOWl1. SpecIllc.1IIaIIDna IlIen-..s lor upgradN lltIeed on syRlm hydrauIc _I n
CUlT8Ilt upd8le to ...._ Plan.
413fGO 73948 NCWRF Deeo TriIection Well 08e1lln and 1n&t8ll Jwo well and new DlW DUmDlna 8l8Ion.
413fGD 73949 SCWAF Emanslon 2001 ExpIInIIlon 01 SCWRF 10 18 mgd MMDF.
S1udy, dNlgn and conatruclIlIn 01. \woilh8SlId bpenIlon of.... pIlInt. 1lle InIIIII
413/GD 73950 NCWRF 30.8 MMADF Expenslon (Phase 1 = 24.1 mgdMMOF) ph_ wII be a 5.1l-mgd MDF (6~ ~ upanaIcln 01118 WRf'. 1lle--'
phM8 wlIallo be s.o mgd AADF (8.5 mgd MMOF). The IIrlIt phIIe allplUlSlcn wi!
_I In . e&pedty 0124.1 mgd MMOF and wi be ~ by 2005. 1lle -.d phue
ellpIIlIIon wII_11n a c:apacIJV ol 3lUI mgd MMOF and wi be ~ by 2010.
New W........ 413 ..-
41WO WW7 land AcquIsItIon Stully for East Central WRF Stu~oIpossIlIa.... b'1oCaIDn 01 up 10 12.1 mgd (mmdl)WAF In EulCantnll
s.vtca A-. -
4131GD WW8 East Central WRF Land Pun:ha8a 50 Ie ... at In Eaat CentraJ _ for... 01 WAF.
413/GD WW1C1 Southeaat WAF Land PUfdIaM 50 Be tie at 1ft Eut CanlraI_ fllr... elWRF.
41WD WW12 East Central WRF Study, dlI8lgn and COI1IlrUc\Ion ola new 4.0 mgd WRF by 2008 and an arpentlon 10
8.0 rMd bv2014 to 12 madlln Anla C to M_- _-..ens.
4131GD WW13 SouIhea8l WRF Study, dlI8lgn and conanatIDn ol. new 3.0 mgct WRF by 2012 and anllllpllllion to
5.0 mgd by 2018 (hplllldIbIa to 10.5 mgd) In ANa 0 10Mrve polanIlal nllW cuRlmlllL
[DIller untlllIlIr 2010.]
T'" __t4...,2DD1 c..wwcp o-tpIIona
....' ...
..,-
19
lttp://WWW .colliergov .netJmodules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=12664
8/2/2010
Page 1 of 1
TML2...1.
funlVI'ype PnIjecI ProJect "-me ~
(A) No.
413fGD WW15 Selvlce to Golden GatII ClIy ".. County ~ tie Golden 0Ia CIty utaJ, __ wllbe h:umId to
decammllllan the DIInI Md dnlcl... to a .
413fGD WW19 R8pI8ce Ex. 4" Force Main wiIh fr' Sludy. de. U1d CClIllIlI'UClIo oIa _ 8./ncIl ron. main fnlIn ..-- Purnpi1g S1IIb
145.00 111 Road 4' fDn:e mUll.
413/GD 20(]2-1 livingston Road FM UpsizB. Regional Park to I.R. Sludy, de. IIIld canRuclIan 01" of e~ 12-lnd1 fon:e main to 2O-tlc:h fan>>
men from ~ P81kto tA.
413fGD 2002-2 VBR fM - Logan Blvd. To GoocI8lt8 Sludy. deaIgn IIIld canatrucllDn oIa,.. 11-end 24Inc:h ton:e main lrom login IlM1 To
GooclIIIIIH'rank RoIld.
413/GD 2002-3 GoOdIeIIe Ad FM - VBR to NCWRF Sludy, deIIgn and CClIIWUdlDn oIa new ~ foRIlI main lram VandelblI8eac:lI
Road to NCWRF
Exldna W....... 414 ProIecta
414/R.R&E 7OO'l:1 Clean Water Act Risk Mat S1udy CIaan W....1d RIIIk Study lor W.........
4141R.R&E 70078 I SDI. AIe.-nent SclIMre SoIIwarw
GoodllIlIe-Frank Road Four L-*'lI ~ (Jet. PM RIdge RoM to Jet.
414/R,R&E 73028 Goodlll1l8 Ad FM RelocatIon VandeIbII8eaCh Rom) Re1Dce1112,500 LF 0116" FM and 4,.-00 LF of 24" FM .. part
01 roed wIdlri'lg projeet 80134
CNlIlIng e set 01 ayatIm ....-Ior the _ and ___r depamt_1II be u1IImd
tor Illea\lon 01......., l11e mapa wII be IIIIDd ~ emeIganCy IIIualIona and.. a
4141R.R&E 73032 Sewer System Mapping reIllIlJnce for IacaI ~ requeIIlng lnfannllllan on our ___ syIIIm.
AtIdIIDneIr, .. mapa wII be UlIIz8d by" PWED Section In plalrilg b' Iubn
8llp8nIIan 01 our IyIlIm to keep upwlh anIcIpaIM QIOWIl.
414/R R&E 73045 FOOT JoInt PI1t8 fund for.. I1lIOcaIon 01_ malna lIom vllllllUa FOOT DftlIecls.
414/R,R&E 73054 Cnty Bam S- Une ReIoc:ate RaIIHneIfIl Hammock Rc1. to DevIa BM:I., ReIDc:lIII _ mens for roed wICIInIng
DIUIect Road 8CheduIId for FY 2008.
4141R.R&E 73060 PoI1 Au Prince S-r Replace IUHtandard __llOIIacllon IY*n IeIVIng 4 slIMlI 01 of PorI-eu-
Pmce Road ldeI.... oIalundila __.
4141R,R&E 73085 CCDOT UlIIIty Relocates ReIocaIIon 01 ulIIles .. may be IIMded given accelMalM Colfty rOIId connuction
SChlIduIllll.
4141R,R&E 73071 Energy EfflcIency Enhancements Sludy aDd Implament eIIIc:tricaI \CllII1Idee to imrpcMI_rgy eIIcIency at 11a1leDnenl
DllInli end RItIDna.
AeIDcalII_ coIection __ and ~ depot to alatger fIlcIlyto
4141R.R&E 731112 Public UtIItIes Operations Center ec:c:anmodale gmwtI. PIoeeede from .. .... of.. e~ tacIIr 818027 Shiley
S1nNIlwll be INIzed and wIIlleD oftaal.. coat 111 nlIDcatI to e _ tacIIr.
4141R.R&E 73078 Henderson Creek Sewer ImplOVtllllents To pIWlde _r lIlIIVIclI CDnI1lIdIone to JlfOP8IllU (M&E IIIld B&Q SoulIl 01 HeI1dllNlln
C.... Rd.
41.uR,R&E 73082 Purnc.Ut Stations Rehab DMIgn IIIld bkI pUmpIng sIIIlIDn rehllbllalDn tor __ coIectlonI.._.
414iR.R&E 73083 Sewer Une Rehab DesIan IIIld bkIlNnchlaa1 _IlIhebIlallDl,Ior......... c:oIecIIDrw departnw1l.
4141R.R&E 73127 SIudae StabiIizalIon SUlge ~
4141R.R&E 731110 FM and PS ImD/OYements ImpRlWllVlllllIll RooUry Bay...... transmllalDn 8VlbIlI.
414/R.R&E 73181 Take Package PIanls OIl-line (4) llW Pro1M:' wlI8IIow.. Counly 111... DVtIt' UIVIclI to ___ al8IDmenIln tle
CoUIitv now MMld _Dlanls.
41.uR RAE 73182 CIlv Plmnanent 1nIer-connect Fon:emeln illIIr-connect wlto CIy 01 N....
41.uR R&E 73163 BSU Inter-connect FDRllIIIIenillllr-connect wlto Bon" SDItIaI UlIIIea
Provlde _ aymm I&lll/l8lylll end IIelcIInvlII\tgalIDn .. I8CClIIIIlIende In lie Sout1
41.cIR.R&E 73164 South County 1&1 Analysis Coller County RegQIa/ WAF f:lea9l FIeport (June 2001). GoeJ 11111 J8duce we!
.....lIllwa to lie SCWRF.
4141R.R&E 73165 Asset Assistance Provlde I.II8IAInce in ollila Cola1Iv'a ~ .......
4141R.R&E 73188 0d0rIC0rr0sI0n control Mull-y8ar IJIlllPIIIlD InveaIIgate end Implement odor and COIIOIIlon conlIoI
1m .. ........ CDlIIIc:lIon 5YIlIIm.
414/R,R&E 73301 VBR - AImort Rd. to CR951 eft RlIoc:atII AeIDce. 8) I'll fon:e main tor l'DIICl canalNc:lIDn.
41.uR,R&E 73302 CR951 - GGB to inmok. Ad. reloCate RebcatB 8) I'll fon:e main for roed canalNc:lIDn.
414/R R&E 73308 Rattl8SH Ad. . Polly to CR951 reIocat8 AeIDce. 8) I'lIlDRllI main for Ill8d conaIrUCliQn.
414/R,R&E 73918 South Cnty Reg WWTP WorI<lnctxIea ~0I PaIIcalln -FW1l BFP Feed pu~
IrlaInlmenIal;I tor _ _ v......
414iR.R&E 73922 Telemetry Adll1lllllmlllry III 530 01860 -* III alIIIIOna IIIld 13 muI8r III ctatIDna over five
w.. alarllnci FV02.
4141R,R&E 73943 30" ImmokaIee Road FM CIaan exIItIna 30" FM IIIld held allIlIon.
The purpoee 01 '* pRljact Ie llelCldldlnll ollie balg lIY*n ICIItwanI C:U1'Nl11lr
414/R,R&E 73944 BlUing System ullIzed by" Dept 01 Aevenue lor WlIIlII' and WW accounIS. The current eoIIweIe
dDeI not have Iaport WIDlg or generdon QIjlII..... AdIIIIonaIIJ, the eoIlw8Je II
Dltided for... number of c:udomenI that Coller County has IIIld wi conlInue to gen.
414/R,R&E 73949 SCWAF EXDIIIl8lon 2001 ExpenaIDn 01 SCWRF1II 18 mad-
414/R,RlE 73950 NCRWRF Em8nd to 30.8 mod MMDF ~ 01 NCWRF 1ll30.811l11d M\.lDF I ..... 1 . 24.1111l1d aowDFl.
4141R.R&E lBD 2003 FDOT Joint Projects ConIngBncy Uld for.. reIocalIon 01_ mUla from variaua FOOT DIOIecl:I.
414/R RAE 1BD S-r Llne Rehab Dam end bid lNncIlllIu ....18IlabRaIon for........., coIec:lIona
414IR R&E TBD PumDlUft Slation Rehab P_.. manhole and IIIl1l111Dn ~, ennuaI conlrlId bid documenIL
4141A.A&E TBD 0d0rIC0rr0a1on Control MuII-y8ar PIlllJIIII " hYIIlIIII1t I/Id hlPIBmInt lJdor fiI aJTOIiIllXll1llCl
ImlllOV8lTl_ the ......... coIIIcIIDn lIYItIm.
4141R,R&E TBD CCOOT UlIII1y ReIocatea ReIDcetlDn 01 uIIIIlllI u may be needed gillen acceIeIaIlId Colfty l'DIICl conelruclIDn
acheduIes.
New W......... 414 ProIKt8
4141R.R&E WW14 DecomrnIalonIna of Pelican Bav WAF Study, deaIan and deoommllllllonha of PeIcan Bay WAF.
414/R,R&E 2002-4 NCWAF OxIdalIon OiIch I llIwo!lY, Dealgn end ConatructIon 01 to NCWRF 0JddelIDn DIch
T_""__~WWCIP_
.....2...
..,-
20
http://wwW ,colliergov .netJrnodules/Show Docurnent.aspx'!oocumentid= 12663
'~.' ~ \ . .
81212010
'.
Page 1 of 1
TUl.I! ..14
Fundl'l'ype ProJect Project ...... o-tpIIon
(A) No.
RECUIIIIED WATER PROJECTS
~ Aeclllmed WaIIIr 413 PraIecta
413fGD 74020 Back P....ure SustaInIng V8lvM InIld lNIc:ll ~ III8IUlMg YalvelellI recIImecI MI_ 1II8IIIr.-IIIM III
crwalIllI_ on dIIIMnd SYSiBm.
413/GD 74021 Golden Gate Canal Supplernenl8l Water SysIem Study, deslgn lIIId canlIlNctIon of..... lD exnct 8Ulface WlIlIIr tar ~ peak
iI'lIIIlI1ion llem8ndI.
413fGD 74029 Efftuent M Master Plan lJDdate UpdatiIIIl!kJent ~8111 porlian 01 .......... mull' pIM.
Onlgn, pIIRIIIllllld eanDuc:t _ ASR 118I......." ... CXlIIIlIuCl up to _ ASR
413/GD 74030 ASR Reclaimed Water Wells .... tar tile jlIIIJlClMI of IrlIec*llllUlplUlllldUnllCl..... during 01.... MId IlIIIiwng
&lII1'IlI during pe8k dlImInd 1Irnn tor .... to _ CUBlDnlerS. NtID hcIudea monlar
...... ""hsI purnp.MId tIIIIlWy.
ConIIrUCI2O' NClMned..... rnUl aIDng VllllClltbll8eM:h Roell 110m AIlpoIt Roell III
413/GD 7..o:M Vandertllft Bch ReclaIm WM 20" VIIQe Wall CIrde to ~ Iowa to the N/S InIIn:omllCl, 118 b)eelon WIlIt MId
customerI_ of 1-75.
Construct 18" I8CIHned ..... rnUl alllng RadIo Ro8d MId s.nta BarlNn BMI. Fran
413/GD 74035 Rallo RdfSanta BarbBra BIvl116" Aedamed WM FDIlIlnI to CcluI*yIIde lD hc:ra8..11Dws lD NIS 1rltIIn:oo.lKl. A poaIlIe aIIImala rDU'e
Is lIIong tile FPl ___ balIIIIIen Davll BML . fladIo ReI.
413/GD 74038 FIacIo Rd 20" ReI WM Conalruct 20" 18ClII1mecI..... "*' alllng RecIo Ro8d 110m Briuwood lD I'oIdft .. pall
01 HIS b1IIrComec:t.
413/G0 74078 RecI8lmed Weter Booster PumP S1alion . North New 600IIBr Pumpbg SIIIllDn.
413/G0 74071 NCWRF 24" Rec:I8Imed Water M81n-NCWRF 10 Vandelblft Beach Rc New Rac:laImecI W_ Transmllllon ......
413/GD 74078 NCWRF 24" RecI8Imed Willer MaJn.,AIft.... I ~ Rd, VBR New FledamedW_T_1aIon MUI.
413/GD 74125 SuppIemenlaIlrrigation Weier ll1udJ, dlIl1ign lIIld ccnstrucIIan 01 ~ W8l8rfldles tar nocIaImecI__
--.n.
41WD TBO 2002 GIOWlh Management Plan Uodale Upda1I plan UelIIIn8IIIINWY" yeua.
413/GD 74037 Miscellaneous EflIuenlllllPlOVeIn8nl& MIaceIlIneous EllWnt lmD_
New Recllllmed W'" 413 ProIecta
41WD RWl ReclaImed Water Booster PS - North SA Sludy, dlIIIign, ll/ld COIIIlNCIDn of booalar lIS rwcomllWldllCl i1 WatIr Reaaua
P .'-"'2001.
413160 RW2 lnlerconnec:t to South SA - 20" ReclaImed WM Sludy, dlIIIgn, MId COMlrudIan of nocIaImecI....' ..... nIClOI11mMIlICl b W.....
Aeaoun:e P AullUSl2OO1.
413/G0 RW3 IntellXlM8Ct to Nor1h SA . 20" ReclaImed WM Study, dMign, lIIId ccnstrucIIan of NClalmed ...... 1M _lIlldIICI h W.....
Resource PlIInnIna ReDort. AUlIUIt2001.
Exl8tlna ...Inwd WaIIIr 414 ProIecIa
4141R,R&E 74015 Misc. Etftuent AIowancetor annuaJ ~ III the recIImecI WIl1llr trwlaml&alan 1IYItam.
4141R,R&E 7401Sl Cnty Barn Ad Eft LIne Relocate RaIIla8nlIIc8 HIIIIlmOCk Rd. III DavII eNd., RaIDcalIIl1IClalmllCl__ rnalna torraod
Road lIClllIduIlId lor FY08.
4141R,R&E 74021 GoIdeI'l Gate Canel SUpplemental Water Svstsm InllIaIlon Of plan III olllaln ,,1n1gdOn _ 110m .. caneL
4141R,R&E 74023 PelIcan BllY Irrg Fire ~ ' ...--
GoodIItlIe-F... RolICl Four laning ~ (Jet. Pine Ridga Ro8d III Jet.
4141R,R&E 74028 GoocIette Rd Reclaim WM - Relocate Vandelbllllellch Roedl ReIocatII 4,400 LF of 20' efftuenl mah .. pBlt of _d '4iIdlrilg
project 80134.
414/R,R&E 74030 Rec:IaImed Water ASR S1udy, dlI8V1 and CXlI1lI1nIclion of Mw I1Idaimed .... ABR ......
4141R,R&E 74031 Rehab SCWRF Reclaimed Wlr Stg Tank ~Ira tD NClUned walIIr lIlDrBlllI1IInk IncUdes lapaInIlD ... c:rac:tcs, conIlIuctIDn
JoInlt and
414/R,R&E 74033 Reclamed Water Telemetry Add tllIIImeby lD 31 llIClIIlmlId WBlllr _lilies and 7 raw waIIIr....... Thant ..19
.... h Nar1II SllrvlC8 AnIa, 7 raw.........., and 12 ....In tile South ServIce_.
4141R.R&E 74039 PelIcan Bay Wells Add two new..... will v.....lIIIelric:aI halr\mentIdiDn MId can1rOlB.
414/R,R&E 74047 Rectalrned Water Aulomalic Read Meters Add auIomdc _d IllBIIIl8Il1 tD enhlltlC8 opeI'IIIIan.
414IR. RaE 74075 EaaIe Lak88 ReclaImed Water Pump SlalIon ~ lD IlICIUnedW.., ps
FIIlldlIIUlIIlI Iden1lly IIOUl'CIIS andlmplllR*ll a ~ --1IUJIP1y 10 alJllll*ll
4141R.R&E 74125 Supplementallrrigallon Water I8ClIalmed __ lII8d tor 1nIgdDn. IncIudH IrnrncIbIH Ad W.m.Id and ReclanlICl
WaIllr line.
4141R.R&E 74300 lmmok. Ad. . US41 to 175 eft reIocaIe RedUnad WlllIIr ~ rabcllllon tor II8W ro.I canaInIl;lIQn.
4141R.R&E 74301 VBR - AiIDOlt Ad. to CR951 eft relocate ~ _ ~ rabcllllan tor II8W ro.I conslruclIan.
4141R,R&E 74302 CR851 - GGB to Invnok. Rd. I'lIIoca1e RecIIImed WBlllr ~ ralDc:atIan for new ro.I c:onIWClIon.
4141R,R&E 74303 GaP - AIrport to SB8 eft relocate Rec:lllinllClwalBr ~ I'lIIoca1Ian for _ road conatruClIon.
4141R,R&.E 74307 MIac. EfIIuent Improvements MIle. EfIMnIlrnpIUvemenIt
414lR,R&E 74308 P..... Bay Reclaimed Water PS Cranes Add c:r- at Pelclln II4Y R8clUn8d PS
21
http://www.colliergov.net/modules/ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid= 12662
8/2/2010
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper
formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning
with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction,
such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow
Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
Goal - revisions to reflect all that supplying potable water entails, and its interdependence with
provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements
Objective I - minor revisions and reformatting
Policy 1.1 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 1.3 - minor revision to provide additional specificity.
Policy 1.5 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 1.6 - minor revision to provide additional specificity.
Objective 2 - revision to strengthen this Policy language, be more inclusive and provide the desired
clarity; reformatting.
Policy 2,1 - minor revisions to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan, correctly reference
an outside document, and provide additional specificity.
Policy 2.4 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan.
Policy 2.5 - minor revision to recognize document updates.
Policy 2.6 - minor revision to update Ordinance reference.
J
POTABLE WATER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Objective 3 - reformatting
Policy 3.1 - minor revisions to reconcile certain LOS standards; deleting an unnecessary statement;
part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; revision to add Ave Maria
facility and LOSS information; consider revision to introduce water pressures and water amounts
as new measures of Levels of Service.
Policy 32 - minor revision to abbreviate.
Policy 3.3 - minor revision to abbreviate.
Policy 3.4 - minor revisions to abbreviate, and provide additional specificity; additional statement
specifying review procedure; verify accuracy of agency names and identifications.
Objective 4 - reformatting.
Policy 4.5 - provide specificity if deemed necessary.
Policy 4.6 - minor revision to eliminate redundant language in describing term used.
Objective 5 - minor revision to provide new departmental reference; defer consideration of suggested
modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for
reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting.
Potable Water Sub-Element - Attached Documents - Numerous changes, with direction to cross-
check GMP locations where similar references to maps & figures are found
- Additional changes to Figure PW-l and related Figures to reflect District boundary changes
associated with RFMUD Sending Lands boundary adjustments - two main areas; 1 on south side
of Immokalee Road.
2
POTABLE WATER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose of the Potable Water Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as
follows:
TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE POTABLE WATER
FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
The intent of the Potable Water Sub-Element is to assure the provision of efficient and economical
services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for a potable water supply
while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5,
EA.e., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
The provision of public facilities and services for potable water supply, stormwater management,
floodplain management and flood protection, and aquifer recharge area protection and watershed
management are planned in correlation with future land use projections. This Goal should be
expanded to fully capture the County's goals in these areas and ensure collaboration in implementing
Objectives and applying Policies. These interdepartmental colaborations should also be recognized,
and strengthend if necessary, in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) and
Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) of this Growth Management Plan.
As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting
Objectives and Policies. As part of the EAR-based amendments, Comprehensive Planning staff is
recommending specific formatting changes for the Sub-Element. In addition, the Sub-Element
contains a number of references to the County's Water & Sewer District. The District's official name
is the "Collier County Water-Sewer District," and the Sub-Element text needs to reflect this.
B. Objectives Analysis:
OBJECTIVE 1:
The County will locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of
the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting - the minimum Level
of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable
water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be
based upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's Ten-Year
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated annually), the Collier County Water-Sewer
Master Plan, and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida
Water Management District.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Section 3.2 of this EAR contains an analysis of the Collier County Growth Management Plan,
including the Potable Water Sub-Element, relative to compliance with the South Florida Water
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
Management District s (SFWMD s) Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Additionally, the staff of the
Collier County Public Utilities Division has prepared a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.
This Work Plan is to be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs at the conclusion
of the SFWMD s update of the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Along with the Work Plan,
County staff will be transmitting related amendments to the Potable Water Sub-Element and the
Capital Improvement Element.
Both the Work Plan and the Sub-Element are based upon the Countys adopted Water Master Plan
Update. The Master Plan utilizes population projections prepared by the Collier County
Comprehensive Planning Department, approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) and accepted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
As part of the EAR-based amendments, Objective 1 should be revised to delete the reference to the
County Water Master Plan and the word "annually" that is in parentheses after the Ten-Year Water
Supply Facilities Work Plan. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an
"objective".
Policy Relevance:
There are currently seven (7) policies within this Objective.
Policy 1.1:
The County shall continue to expand the ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recovery) system as a
potential emergency and seasonal potable water source.
This Policy calls for the continuing expansion of the County's Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR)
Program. This Policy remains relevant and should be rewritten not to be utility specific, but to mention
those jurisdictions, generally, that have an ASR Program to expand.
[fublic Comment from February 23. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that there is a concern
over the potential waste of re-use water; asking if re-use water can be treated to a standard
satisfactory as a drinking water source, and; observing that water should not be treated to a standard
of which there is not a demand]
Policy 1.3:
The County shall continue to identify sufficient quantities of water sources to meet the
County's estimated growth-related needs. Potential water sources to meet the County's 2025
water demands include raw water from Hawthorn Zone I Aquifer (Intermediate Aquifer System)
and Lower Hawthorn Aquifer (Florida Aquifer System), identified within the County's 2005
Water Master Plan. The County shall use these water sources as well as alternative sources,
as permitted by the State, to meet the County's needs.
This Policy requires the County to identify sufficient water supply sources to address future needs.
This Sub-Element may be affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted
into law in 2005, as follows:
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
163.3191(2)(1): The Evaluation and Appraisal Report must determine whether the local
government has been successful in identifying alternative water supply projects,
including conservation and reuse, needed to meet projected demand. Also, the Report
must identify the degree to which the local government has implemented its 10-year
water supply workplan.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. Reporting the County's success in identifying
alternative water sources and the degree to which the 10-year workplan has been implemented mayor
may not require revision of this Sub-Element to be in compliance with the above Statutory change.
This Policy should be revised to delete the second sentence referring to water sources only if aI/owed
by Statute and reword the last sentence to "The County shall seek supply from all permissible sources
of raw water cited in the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan to meet the County ~ needs. "
[Public Comment from February 23, 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting the County should
develop new tools to predict future water availability]
Policy 1.5:
The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District in the
development of the Water Master Plan Update, which is the primary planning document for the
Collier County Water-Sewer District.
This Policy requires the County to identify sufficient water supply sources to address future needs.
The Water Master Plan document does not cover all areas and jurisdictions in the County and this
reference should be changed. This Policy should be revised to replace "Water Master Plan Update"
with "Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan" and to replace "the Collier County Water-Sewer
District" with "Collier County".
Policy 1.6:
The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to produce
Plans for water supply as described within the Water Master Plan Updates that ensure the
County's ability to maintain its stated Level of Service standard.
This Policy calls for continuation of a County program for protecting existing and potential water
supply sources. Protection of existing and potential water supply sources is under the jurisdiction of
the County's Pollution Control Department. This Policy should be revised to replace "Water Master
Plan Updates" with "Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan".
[fublic Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Questioning the status of and
responsibility for monitoring and maintaining our water resources.]
OBJECTIVE 2:
The County shall implement the following policies to make certain that public and private
sector potable water service utilities provide, repair and/or replace potable water supply,
treatment and distribution facilities to correct existing deficiencies in their respective service
areas as may be required to meet or exceed the Level of Service Standards established in this
3
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
Plan. In addition, public sector potable water service utilities will be expanded as necessary to
provide for future growth, as provided for in the following policies.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
Collier County s private water and wastewater utilities are regulated through the Utility & Franchise
Regulation Section of the Community Development & Environmental Services (CDES) Operations
Department. This agency serves as stafffor the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority. The
Utility & Franchise Regulation Section is the County entity responsible for monitoring compliance
with County regulations by the various private utilities located in Collier County. In addition to
managing the operations of the Department and Section, the CDES Operations Director is also the
Executive Director for the Water and Wastewater Authority The Authority is the regulatory entity for
the four (4) utility franchises operating in Collier County.
In regulating the operations of the County s private utilities the Authority, which is appointed by the
Board of County Commissioners, exercises considerable power. They may set rates, adjust franchise
boundaries, set quality of service standards and intervene in disputes between utilities and customers.
The publicly owned (as opposed to privately owned) water supply system is operated by Collier County
as the Collier County Water District. The District is responsible for developing, operating and
maintaining all of the County s public facilities related to potable water treatment and distribution.
This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should
be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
{Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from AU$!Ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting this
language be strengthened to be fully inclusive and clear about non-County supplies and suppliers.]
Policy Relevance:
There are six (6) policies within this Objective.
Policy 2.1:
The Collier County Water-Sewer District shall continue the development of a Collier County
Regional Potable Water System consistent with the Capital Improvement Element and the
Collier County Water-Sewer Master Plan to correct existing deficiencies and provide for future
growth.
This Policy calls for the County to continue development of a Regional Potable Water Utility System.
This Policy should be deleted or rewritten to not be utility specific - - - include both Water - Sewer
District and the County Water and Wastewater Authority; replace Master Plan with 10-Year Water
Supply Plan.
Post-EAC Workshop comment: Reference to: County Water-Sewer Master Plan OK to read as:
Countv 10- Year Water Supplv Plan. and not Lower West Coast Supply Plan.
4
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
Policy 2.4:
Collier County shall permit development of potable water supply systems as follows: within
the Designated Urban Areas of the Plan, including the outlying urban areas of Immokalee,
Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the Islands; within the areas depicted
on the Collier County Water District Boundaries map (Figure PW-1); within the Existing and
Future Potable Water Service Areas map (Figure PW-2), which includes the Rural Transition
Water and Sewer District; in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when
Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use
Element, is utilized; in Towns, Villages, Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments within the
Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay; and, in areas where the County has legal commitments
to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this Plan. For lands located
within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, but in which County water service is not
currently available, non-County potable water supply systems shall only be allowed on an
interim basis until County service is available.
Individual potable water supply wells may be permitted within the areas depicted on the Collier
County Water District Boundaries map (Figure PW-1) on an interim basis until County water
service is available; individual potable water supply wells may be pennitted in all Urban
designated areas outside of the areas depicted on Figure PW-1 on an interim basis until a
centralized potable water supply system is available; individual potable water supply wells
may be permitted in the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, depicted on the Existing
and Future Potable Water Service Areas map (Figure PW-2), on an interim basis until County
water service is available; individual potable water supply wells may be permitted in Sending
Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the
Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized, on an interim basis until
County water service is available; and, individual potable water supply wells may be pennitted
on lands outside of the Urban designated areas, outside of areas depicted on Figure PW-1, and
outside of Towns, Villages and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred
(100) acres in size within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay - all areas where potable
water supply systems are not anticipated. However, individual potable water supply wells may
or may not be permitted within Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less
in size, depending upon the uses pennitted within the Compact Rural Development Also, in
Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres
in size, potable water supply wells are allowed to serve no more than 100 acres, on an interim
basis only, until central service is available.
This Policy remains relevant and allows development of new or expanded potable water systems in
certain portions of unincorporated Collier County. It also allows the use of individual water supply
wells in areas where County or other central water supply service is unavailable. This Policy should be
revised to replace "until County water service is available" with a more inclusive statement, such as,
"until a centralized potable water supply system service is available". This includes mapping
changes and new map information derived from the private, or smaller, providers or districts.
Policy 2.5:
The County shall continue enforcement of ordinances requiring connection of existing and
new development to central potable water systems when they become available. Connections
to a central system shall be made pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 01-73, adopted
December 11,2001.
This Policy calls for the County to continue enforcing mandatory connection to a central water supply
system, when such is available. This Policy should be revised to add "as amended" to the end of the
last sentence.
5
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
Policy 2.6:
Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to
provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially
within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, water service shall be connected to the regional
system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water-
Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01-
57, adopted October 23, 2001, or its latest revision, and District construction and operating
policies.
This Policy requires Community Development Districts, or other Special Districts to connect to
County water facilities when such are available. This Policy should be revised to replace "Ordinance
01-57, adopted October 23,2001" with "Ordinance 04-31, adopted May 11,2004".
OBJECTIVE 3:
Pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, ES., including any amendments thereto, Collier County has
implemented procedures to ensure that at the time a development order is issued, potable
water facility capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum Level of Service Standards
established herein is available or will be available to serve the development under the
guidelines established for concurrency in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective is the County's potable water concurrency provision. The Collier County Water-Sewer
District achieves concurrency of its stated LOS standard. The disclosure of this achievement is
reported within the periodic updates of the County's Water Master Plan. This Objective is being
achieved and it should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to
improve its formatting as an "objective". Add the parenthetical "(LOS)" or "(LOSS)" to allow use of
acronyms in subsequent Policies.
Policy Relevance:
There are four (4) policies within this Objective.
Policy 3.1 :
The following Level of Service Standards are hereby adopted and shall be used as the basis
for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a
development:
Review of the historical ratio of residential to non-residential demand indicated that
approximately 17% of the total water usage is non-residential. Thus, the residential demand is
154 gpcd and the total finished water demand is 185 gpcd.
6
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
FACILITY CAPACITY
FACILlTY/SERVICE AREA
LEVEL OF SERVICE
STANDARD
185 gpcd
Collier County Water-Sewer District
Goodland Water District
Marco Island Water District
Marco Shores
CITY OF NAPLES FACILITIES
Unincorporated Service Area
EVERGLADES CITY FACILITIES
Unincorporated Service Area
185 gpcd
185 gpcd
185gpcd
185 gpcd
INDEPENDENT DISTRICTS
Orangetree Utilities
Immokalee Water and Sewer District
Florida Governmental Utilities Authority
100gpcd
100gpcd
100gpcd
This Policy remains relevant and lists the Level of Service (LOS) Standards for the various Collier
County potable water utilities, both public and private. This Policy should be revised to delete the
second paragraph and update the Level of Service Standards, as the Collier County Water-Sewer
District is now 170 gpcd. The Policy should be revised to indicate the LOS standard for Ave Maria
Water and Wastewater facilities, which are inside the County
The LOSS for wastewater treatment appearing in Policy 3.1 above is one of two locations within this
GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5; subsection "0" in the Capital
Improvement Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that
the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location
selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the crn
could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the
figures. This Policy will remain relevant in its reconciled format.
{Planning Commission (CCPc) Comment from August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Supporting staff
suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the CIE, with this Sub-Element being revised to
direct readers to the CIE for this information. The CCPC also suggests considering whether water
pressures and water amounts could be introduced as LOS standards. Add Ave Maria facilities to this
listing.}
Policy 3.2:
In order to ensure that the Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 are maintained,
methodologies for determining available capacity and demand shall incorporate appropriate
peak demand coefficients for each facility and for the type of development proposed.
This Policy remains relevant and requires that public and private utility methodologies for determining
available capacity and demand must incorporate appropriate peak demand coefficients for each facility
and for the type of development proposed. This Policy should be retained essentially as written. This
Policy may be revised to abbreviate "Level of Service " to "LOS".
7
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
Policy 3.3:
The Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 are the minimum criteria for
replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water supply facilities.
This Policy remains relevant and states that the LOS Standards contained in Policy 1.3.1 "are the
minimum criteria for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water supply facilities."
This Policy should be retained as written. This Policy may be revised to abbreviate "Level of Service "
to "LOS".
Policy 3.4:
The County will annually review historical potable water demand records and adjust the Level
of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 if so indicated by the annual review.
This Policy remains relevant and requires an annual review of potable water demand records, with
adjustment of the LOS Standards, as necessary, based upon the findings of the annual review. This
Policy should be revised to replace "County" with "Collier County Water and Wastewater
Authority ", and add a second sentence, such as the following: "The Collier County Water-Sewer
District shall review historical potable water demand records during Collier County Wastewater
Master Plan updates and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 3.1, if needed." and
retained as rewritten. This Policy may be revised to abbreviate "Level of Service " to "LOS".
f?lanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that
changes ensure the proper identification of the responsible entities.}
OBJECTIVE 4:
The County shall continue to promote conservation of potable water supplies by developing
and implementing an integrated, comprehensive conservation strategy which will identify
specific consumption per capita goals.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
This Objective commits the County to the implementation of an ongoing water conservation program.
This Objective is being achieved and as such, it should be retained, essentially as written. This
Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
Policy Relevance:
There are currently seven (7) policies within this Objective. The Objective and policies are similar to
Objective 4 and its policies within the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element (refer to the Sanitary Sewer
Section of this Report).
Policy 4.5:
Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to
provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially
within the Collier County Water-5ewer District, and where such districts make provisions for
irrigation via dual systems utilizing effluent and/or other irrigation sources, said systems shall
be connected to the regional system when available, and all internal irrigation systems shall
remain in private ownership and be master metered by the County.
8
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
This Policy requires Community Development Districts, or other special infrastructure districts, to
connect to the County Utility System when they irrigate using dual systems and are located within the
Collier County Water-Sewer District Service Area. This Policy remains relevant and should be
retained as written. SHOULD THIS POLICY PROVIDE A SPECIFIC ORDINANCE CITE?
Policy 4.6:
The County shall promote the use of xeriscape techniques (landscaping method that
emphasizes water conservation in its use of drought resistant landsGaping plants) to minimize
potable water use for landscape irrigation.
This Policy remains relevant and requires the County to promote xeriscaping as part of its conservation
program with regard to irrigation reduction. This Policy should be retained essentially as written.
OBJECTIVE 5:
The County shall discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector potable water
service suppliers in an effort to maximize the use of existing public facilities through the
development order approval process by implementing the following policies.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective seeks to discourage urban sprawl through maximization of existing public water supply
utilities. Further, the Objective states that this action will be achieved through the local development
review process. The Public Utilities Engineering Department coordinates with the Zoning & Land
Development Review Department in the review of development order applications to ensure that the
requirements of this Objective are met. This Objective is being achieved and his Objective should be
retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an
"objective".
Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing OHG emissions
in furtherance ofHB 697,
CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR
POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697.
{flanning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 27.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies following from the adoption of HB 697may
be misplaced and consideration for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address
multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location, and should be removed from the! as a
proposed revision.]
9
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
C. Attached Documents Analysis:
PW-1.1 Collier County Water District Boundaries
This map has the same title as Figure PW-l and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies,
should be deleted
PW-1.2 Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas
This map has the same title as Figure PW-2 and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies,
should be deleted
Table PW-8 Capital Improvement Projects FY 2003-2022
This table is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is specific to the Collier County Water-
Sewer District. For those reasons, this table should be deleted
Figure PW-l Collier County Water District Boundaries
This map is referenced in multiple Policies and is wrong. The references to this map should be
changed to reference "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas" since the District
Boundaries are included Additional changes relating to RFMUD Sending Lands boundary
adjustments.
Figure PW-2 Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas
This map is referenced in the same Policies as Figure PW-l and should also be updated to the 2008
Water Master Plan Figure 1-1 (attached). Recommend similar maps be addedfor other Water Systems
overseen by the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority.
Figure PW-3 Potable Water Treatment and Transmission Facilities
This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and should be deleted
Look for the "Attached Document Analysis" items above to appear in the Capital Improvement
Element as cross references, and revise or delete in manners similarly with above instructions
(f>lanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from December 7, 2010 EAR Adovtion Hearinf! -
Recognizing staff comments regarding further revisions to certain Figures associated with District
boundary adjustments.)
10
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT
Pages 11-14 Blank
Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing
FIGURE PW-1.1
/J
'n~>nn_,_, ,>IMMOKAlEERO E-
Southeast Area
~
co
if)
uJ
o
::s
o
n::
w
>
w
GATE
Legend
Collier County Water District Boundaries
Entity
City of Naple.
FGCU Service Area
L__J North Area
_ Northeast Area
11II Orange Tree
South Area
(
County
COLLIER COUNTY WATER:P~ISTRICT BOUN('
15
FIGURE PW-2.1
EXISTING AND FUTURE POTABLe_ WATER SERVI~&>A
'"
w
Cl
5
'-'
cr
w
>
w
GOLDEN GATE BLVD W>>-
.
Legend
Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas
Entity
City of Naples
FGCU Service AlBa
L____j North Area
_ Northeast Area
Orange Tree
South Area
County
Southeast Area
';.~,i::{<:/
16
TA8LE PW"
Page 1 of 1
CAPITAL "'PROVEMENT PRO.IECTS FY 2OCl3-2022
PROJECT DESCIIP110NS
WATER 1REA11IENT. TRAN_18SlON AND lIISTIIIIUTION
G....., _ HInMn UP
0cIllber 2llCl2
FuncIfT'WIe PrDjIct ~Na_ llMalpIIan
(~ No.
II!IdatinaW_411 (GrawtIl ~Pnllect8
~ _ca__ _ "'.......... '" GClOdIIII-FIMc IIld PIne'" _ _ al
4111GO 70040 ~ InIerconnect ~ g/ LeIIewuod IIIwd. _ DM.1IIwd. Prujed........ pr-.tor.. ~"'c.."_, '"
Cllyandec.ny__ n.._alln__
411/GO 70052 MIInalM Station Pump lJpgrade ........ ~ IIld UIllIID ~ 1IIld_ g/.. W'" SIoo9 Fdlyon "'-- AllId
10 ... arowllJ.
Nlw8-MGD RO Elrp8NIon II 12-MGD t""al~ SCRWTP. ROlI)8IIIn........ 12.-
411100 70054 SCRWTP 8 MGO RO Plant and 12M00 Expension -eupply- -_ 2 dMplr1ocllan...... ____,... SCADA...... O&M
........ - bIlIndIr1a...... .......,cy ~and __ __.,...... RO"""... be
__1a2O-MGD.
411100 70075 NCAWTP 3 Addlllonal Bracltlsh Water SuIloIv Wells Add....... A.O.....
"'-1- '*Vt IIIld CllNlIuct a 38" _main aIang ~ Road from CR 85110 0.......
411100 70093 1mmokaIe1l Road East 38" WTM _'lolabe~"'''__pI'lIjecl. _2ladoaliln__ala
36" _ main bam ........... AllId 10 \lit _ HE WTl'.
411100 70086 Water MlII1lIr PlIIn ltIdates ArnlII ~ '" W_..... Plan.
411fGO 7OOIT1 SCAWTP 12 MGO RO ~ Doolan and_ g/ 12-MGD__....- IISCRWTP
411fGO 7OOlJ8 GrowI1 Plan llpdalll ~____ g/GIawII PIIn_"'-_.
411100 70140 Eat Cen1raI WTM '*Vtancl_aI EIBI c.tnII___..an"'*-
411100 70150 Vanderbilt BeaCh Roed PBrahI Wll18f MaIn Doolan and __ ala ~ _-....... IMhbam AIrpGlt AllId Ia CR 851
411/00 70151 CR 951 ~ Blvd \0 RatIIllsnake Hammock DIIoIgn __Ion ala 38"__malnalangCR 851 from DIMe ~Ia
___~AllId
411100 70152 CR 951 WTlA-Ra1llllanakll Hammock to US 41 '*Vt-- of a 24" _'-'IIalonmaln aIang CR 851 !10m __.--
Road lD us 41
411100 70153 US 41 W'TM- South from CR951 DeaIgn and ___ ",a 14" _ main aIang US 41bam CR 8511a ~ RDad
411100 70154 Land AcaUlllllon for NERWTP (0mI118 TIlMII _.,47......_T WTP_WRF_
411/GD 70155 Land Acqullllllon for SERWTP """"- addIIDnaI ~.....Ia -.g...... _I'urnpq _ ~ far... WlP_
41l1GD 70158 V8IIderbib DrIve BoosllIr PS Daotgn and ConaInJClIon lor v_ IlIW Boaalar PS
4111GO 70157 ManIIIBe Roed PoI8bIe Wsl8r ASR Wells DeaIgn and __ g/ eqIaIlIIan "'.. ASR... II \lit _ RDad.....
411100 70862 us 41 WM - M--.1D Boyne South CanIlrucIIon g/ _main __ US 41 from __10 Bowne SalMI.
411/GD 711888 lMngIlan Road WallIr MaIn from Pine RIdge RoIId to Ccnolrucla '" WM alang LMlgIlan Road from PIne IllcIlla AoatIIo VIlIIIIIbII Baech Aollll_
VandeItIIl Beach Road ... AoatI pllljecl
411/GD 70881 Uvingeton Irnrnok8IlIe-Vanderbllt ean.l1ucl18' WM alang LMngIIon AoatIIIOIlI V_ Baech _to ~ RDad_
...... Aaad DnlIacI. .
411/GD 708lI2 SCRWTP 20MGD ~ Wel Easement Study F.........1IIudy and _ ~
411/GD 0??oo R8mol8 OIs1nfec1ion Booster SIudr,doaliInand_al_~__
....W_..l1 PraIlIctII
4111130 W5 Vanderbilt DrlVIl W8C8r Booster S181lon DeaIgn__lIlClMW____
411/GD W13 NERWTP SIudJ, cIIaIgn and _aI MW 3.0 mgd WTP (-.pandIbIa 10 15 mgd) Ia..... -.. ~
T_ aIanland__..._..~Aand B.
411/GO W14 SERWTP SIudJ, cIIaIgn and __ '" MW 3.0 mgd W1P 1..........1a 15 mgd) Ia __ paltllIIaIMW
_,. In..... _1Ild AIM D.
411100 W17 Ratllesnake Hammock 8'/12" WTM lJDanIde IlM91 and _ a 24" WM ..... CR 851 10 US 41 along RaItIIInaIe HImrnact Ad.
411100 W29 New WeIIleId Study for I'rqlOHd NERWTP ~ paMnIlaJWIIIeId IacaItona and _~_
411100 W30 New Welfield Study for I'rqlOHd SERWTP ~. polonlIo/..-...s IacaItona and _ --.a_
4111GD W31 Umd Acauislllon for NERWTP Welllleld ~~IorNERWTP__lIlIIllIlolna_1IIudI'
411/G0 W32 Umd AcQUlsIllon for SERWTP Welllleld ~ ~IorSEAWTP_1aIIawIng \IIIIlIIld IIIudr
ExIet1na W._ 412 me-a1l11ll1
4121R,R&E 700V CIelIn walllr Act AM S1udy EPA __ A.cly lor cNolIne and -1lataClll__ '* _ mpiIcIIIona _
01_ ta -.boollokal.........__
GoocIeIIe-F_ RDad Iaur tanng ~ (Juct. PIne IllcIlla ReI. III Jcl. Y..-Ileacll Rd)
"121R,R&E 70028 GoodIatI8 Ad WallIt Main ReIac:aIe 12,500 LF 0124" WU..... ...-. ~ I.-.....c at PN IlIdge fill. "1*1 "'...
taIllI 110134.
~ alai g/ SyaIenlIllllpllIar" W_ _ w_..llapla. Ta be I8IIIcltor ~ alII
4121R.R&E 70033 WallIr Syst8m Mapping --- AddIIIonIIIy "mape" be UIIIZIllI by" PlIED 8eclIan n JlIlII"*'lIIor llIunI --., al
_~ta_..._
CGnlfnganqIIInd lor ~ g/ _ _lor FOOT pIlIjecIa. _1ocaIIona. US 41 ta....
4121R,R&E 70045 FOOT JaInt PfCject CCUnIy Ln<< AIrpaIl Rel.1a ~.-.- Rd.;RalIIoanaQ _ Rel.1a CR 85; -lIIIV
_FOOT ..........
ReIac:aIe__torFDOT_ p_-.....and.-.-cor-.d*jIld
4121R,R&E 70047 ReIocatll 2fY'/12" W_ Main US 41 CllIlIIIdllr& ....--..naI_ by--""_ __ ~Io ""-101'_
-- The poolIon al u-. CounIy dapOIII_ _ ~ NIuncIIllI by FOOT... be I'IIClapaobd 10
_the IddIIlonaI wolk.
___IorFDOT_ Poc>r_d.-.go and ____d*jIld
412/R,R&E 70048 Relocate 12' We_ Meln US41 corhCIW 6 fI(JiIId IIdlIIIonIIWOIk by ___ __ MlMnIIIRIPlIGIDr Is I8CUrId for lIlldIIonII
-- The poolIon af 1I1a Caunly dIpaolI1hat _ prwIcuIJ 181_ by FOOT wi be ...........Ia
CD"""___
4121R,RlE 70053 County Barn Road Water MaIn F1e1oca1ll -- - Rel.laDevlo 1IIwI., ~ al__ IorCaunlyBam ReI. ~ fill.
_torFY 2007.
4121R,R&E 70057 F8ciIitv ReheblIIa1lon ~-__or"NCRWTP,SCl'lWTP,_and__
17
http://www.colliergov.net/modules/ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid= 12634
8/212010
Page 1 of 1
TA11L2 .....
FuncIfI'p I'rajMt PtoiNt ..... ............
(A) No.
lor"-, __,_...___..~~_.......
412/R,RAE 7llOS8 DIEIlulIon Systwn RehabllilBllon lICJW Is nal................... fA....... In'" __ 1bIa pnljIct..___
dIIIc:IInc:III, IS woI IS ....... a nurnbIr fA IlIdIr _In" $JIl&m 1IlII.... b&coma
R-.-"W_~w.--"""a__~ n.~..._
~. alempcnry""'" __a __ al i6~ n._8I&IIIsnow88,
412/R,1UE 70059 Public lJ1IIIlIes 0pera1I0ns Center -~ -*,,**,1060 ...,.._..II&llI.... ~ AdcIIlonIIr." ____ Is
~-..~.I&IQNlOd_. ThIIldIy..__..W_DlldUlanF-"
W__...........,Illdp,f*Woob~
412/R,NE 70063 NCWlP NoiIe Abld8menI =:::: :....~al_ -... _ hlln-..ln _pl'Clllln<<ylOthe_1Ie
412/R,RIE 70085 NCWTP Manel8e & CerIc:a Chlorine Gu CorMrsIon CGlw.l....... __........... NCRWTP ~ RoacI T.. n c.a TanllIlO
~ BINch.
~.-yofGGW-.cIIlJ~6~_IO..-.rt_Illd~I"
412/R,R&E 70085 Golcllln Ga1lI WeI/IieId Improvement 3,llllO LFoIra.__ rnMl. -. __ addIIanII_.......... rt.-...a
_In lhe_" -woInudI 10 lie ......1IlCI.--cl.
412/R,R&E 70067 Golden Ga. 11M:110' Water MMt R-.- 10' _ _... GoldIn 0.. __ FlllIn undor~..........
4121R,R&E 70069 Upgr8d8 NCWTP Emergency Pow.r OiIIJI3U1lon New __ clIItltIUIon loMd IIlCI ~......IO __... plant CIpINIIon """'.... .......
....._-....-w-.... .
412/R,R&E 70071 CCDOT UlIIllY ReIoca18l
4121R,R&E 70074 PorI All PrInce W8I8rtSew8r ImprtMlllllllllS ReplIo:e -. --...... ___ _... pnljIct to ......-..ndaRI.......
calIaclIan 4 _ all fA PClll au Pllnce ADC
412/R,R&E 70075 NCRWTP BracIcIsh SIJDPIv WaIlIr Wella lloIo9IlIlCI~al___...,..lar.. NCRWTP
4121R.RAE 70078 Auto M8l8r FIeed Ins1IIIllI1Ion _oI~-...c___
4121R.R&E 70078 So8daI Aueumenl Softw8nI AIpIMe ouIIdIIecI..... tor SpeaIiII & J J 1111._
4121R,RAE 7OOIlO MIIIt8r PS Fuel S\oIaae __lar10_...._G...__~1lIIIIon
4121R,R&E 7OOll4 NCRWTP lmP_rnentI '-'1lld_a1~ """""'_......NCRW1P
412/R,R&E 7OOll5 2003 Fldlty AehebIlIl8IIon RII1IIlIIlIIe v&ItauI-..... 01.. NCRWT'P, SCftWTP, ..... and _......
................... AddIIonIIr, -...- -........ ~ s,awn "'-.......
412/R.R&E 70088 2OO3D1&trlbutlon SyslBm RehabIIIedon _ Is not ~.... 10..... of....... In'" _ 1bIa projecl wI_ "-
-.eIIs... woI IS.......... a _ alllldlr _In" Syalarn... .... __
412/R.R&E 70100 NCRWTP ASR eon-.Ion NCRW1P ASfI eon..r.Ion
412/R,NE 70124 Wider Dl&trlbutlon TeIem8lry ...lldd lllIamIlry...........
4121R.R&E 70127 CrwtaI Lake Rot ReIoca1Ian R-.-..... __a
41l!1R.R&E 70128 Counll/ UIIIlv Sland1n18 ~ CllIftv llIIty.........
4121R.R&E 7'0158 I.DWItr T8mIamI Well ___woIpof_lo~
412/R,R&E 7017'0 VuhlrablIlIv ~ Sludv F'wIorm awlnorablly_lUlvlortha__
412/R,RAE 70202 2003 UlIIltv Stand8I'lIlI 200S ~ to CllIftv.- &lInclan:Ia
412/R,R&E 70300 Invnok. Rd.-tJS41-175 R8locate lloIo9IlIlCI_lor~ al-.g _mUI Cl'\ --.lIledfrllm US.' 11I17&
412/R,R&E 70301 VBR - AiIponICR951 R8locate DaIIgn n _lor NIocaIIon al &llIIIIng _r mUI Cl'\ V......1aKh FIoad frIIm AIIplrt
FIoad ... CA lISI
412/R.R&E 703lI2 CR951 - GaP to Immok. Ad, ReIoaIIa lloIo9I and-.uction I...~ al~ _mUI on CR 1151 """'_ o.a p..-y...
ImntoIl&I&e _
412/R,R&E 70303 Golden Ga1lI P~ - AIrport Rd. to SB8 relocalll lloIo9I and -.uction lor _ al ~ _ main Cl'\ Golden Gala ~""'" AirporI Ad III
SanIa _1lMI.
412/R,R&E 70308 Ralllesnake Hammock Ad. - PoIIV to CR951 reIocaIlI
412/R.A&E 70881 8ackFIDw I C-.connectIon ...... Ttjs Is a.... _ pIlljecl. _.._ al..l_ baIna"",-1n the ........ ~ al..
UpdoIa" -..g s~ _ c:unanar-IlJ" Oopl. GlAavwlua tor_lIlCI_
412JF\,R&E 70882 Billing Sys1Bm _ The cunanl_ daaa nal....l&pOIt....... or gonenlIon ~ -.."..
_II_lor" runIlar a1_'" c* ccU.tv hMlIlCIwII..........._
.......... 412 ProIKta
412/R,R&E we NCRWTP RD Mernbr8ne nt ~ III __
4121R,R&E W9 NCRWTP NanoIUIer Replacillrnent ~---III--
4121R.R&E W10 SCRWTP ~ RIlQlecement ~----III-.
412/R,R&E 2002.1 Aa IIlIIIded consutIIna urvIcelI Ita I10lIdad .......
412/R,R&E 2002-2 NCWRTP SaIIwa18r FeuIlIIIv Study... ___ t.-v a1lr1al1ng _ at -. and ._.......
412JA_RAE 2002-3 A\lIIO R8nch Road MSBU ~ Ranch _ MSBU
412/R R&E 2002-4 Aaaet Manaaemenl Paolarm _ 9Iullr
412/R,R&E 2002-5 SCRWTP Une SOll8nIna New Fourth Reaclor Studw._IIlCI_oI.___-..,_lor~
4121R.RII: W33 NERWTP AD MeInbrane --~III--
412/R R&E W34 SERWTP RO Mambrane ~ *-.
1 . 411/GD. GrowIh Driven (Funded by IqIect F_)
2. 412/R.R&E. RII_t. Repl8cement & Enh8ncement (FuncllId by User Fee)
18
http://www.colliergov.netlmodules/ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid= 12633
8/2/2010
l
i
I CClWE!t CCUIITY GCMllNloENT
1--1'IJoN
. 1OCl2 -..c U1IJ1IES ~
I POl'MAIE -.111I SI.IIlE1.DoIDIT
,
R 25 E
R 21 E
R XI E
..
!f
....
~
....
..
g
;;;
..
II
t
FIGURE PW-1
4L .. ~
--...
..
,
,
2
;;
ISIEN)
==--,... C!
tift IF ...
=r.:=l
.--
=-- D
--
--
...
11
MARCO ISI..AI\I)
M.CT
COLUER COUNTY WATER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
19
.......v AND HAM... ....
octa!El< .'lOO2
R ... E
R lllI E
R %1 E
t
,., - -
-....
..
~
~
a
..
I..IliIEND
R
......-
=rt1':/U
:='-::.:r'"
..II....
--
-
.-
---
--
--
=-
..
lI:I.II'r
===rt.r _
--
-
R 2lI E
R 211 E
R 'D E
FIGURE PW-2
..
~
t
..
Sf
..
..
Wi
..
..
:l
'il'Jllllr~!i>:
I
I
I CIlUJI3t CCllJNlY ~
_ _ PUN
l 20lll PUIIUC U1IU1lES WJlEJlT
I 1'Ol'AlU: WA1Elt SI.IE1.EIIEHl'
I " 2lI E
EXISTING AND FUTURE POTABLE
WATER SERVICE AREAS
20
.....urv AND M..... _
0CIllIIEIt2Olll
R .. E
R Z1 E
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Public Facilities Element - Draina2e Sub-Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper
formatting for all Goals. Objectives and Policies. as defined below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve. typically beginning
with "TO" followed by a transitive verb. such as. TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s). typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction.
such as. "Implement". "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow
Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Sub-Element's goals. typically beginning with phrases like. "The County shall
promote...... "The County shall continue to..... or "The District shall expand..... or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes. designee changes. renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions. and grammatical changes.
To be renamed. including Sub-Element. Goal and throughout Objectives and Policies
Goal - revisions to reflect all that stormwater management entails. and its interdependence with
provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting.
Objective 1 - minor revision to reflect GIS use; reformatting.
Objective 2 - reformatting.
Policy 2.1 - part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; verify that "as
amended" may be used in this context.
Objective 3 - reformatting.
Policy 3.4 - revision to provide the desired clarity.
Objective 4 - reformatting. with consideration of minor revision to provide the emphasis suggested
by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC).
Policy 4.1 - revision to update document reference.
Objective 5 - reformatting; verify that "as amended" may be used in this context.
1
DRAINAGE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Objective 6 - reformatting, with consideration of revisions to provide additional natural drainage
feature protections in certain County projects, introducing new detention features and including
filter marshes, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC).
Policy 6.1 - verify that certain Federal and State standards would apply, with the proper agency
protocols, whether or not references are included to them.
Policy 6.2 - minor revision to update document cite; revision to coincide with the increased water
quality treatment requirement found in the CCME.
Policy 6.3 - minor revision to update document cite; consideration of revisions to provide additional
natural drainage feature protections, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC).
2
DRAINAGE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Public Facilities Element - Drainage Sub-Element
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose of the Drainage Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows:
COLLIER COUNTY SHAll PROVIDE DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING
AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING
WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS.
The intent of the Drainage Sub-Element is to assure the provision of drainage and flood protection
facilities and services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for
storm water management while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set
forth in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008
included the initial step toward re-naming of this Sub-Element from the "Drainage" Sub-Element to the
"Stormwater Management" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all titles, headings and
text within this Sub-Element, and in all references to this Sub-Element found throughout the Growth
Management Plan.
Note that, in one respect, there is overlap in the intended purpose of the Drainage and Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge areas. However,
the emphasis of the Drainage Sub-Element is on surface water protection, whereas the emphasis of the
Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is on groundwater protection. For an evaluation
of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element, refer to that Section of this Report. In
addition to the overlap of policies within the Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
Sub-Elements, there is also an overlap between the intended purpose of the Drainage Sub-Element and
Goal 2 of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (refer to the CCME Section of this
Report), including the Watershed Management Plans discussed under Objective 2.1 of the CCME.
EAR-based amendments made to those sections should be reflected in this Sub-Element, as necessary.
As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting
Objectives and Policies.
The provision of public facilities and services for stormwater management, floodplain management
and flood protection, potable water supply and, aquifer recharge area protection and watershed
management are planned in correlation with future land use projections. This Goal should be
expanded to fully capture the County's goals in these areas and ensure collaboration in implementing
Objectives and applying Policies. These interdepartmental colaborations should also be recognized,
and strengthend if necessary, in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) and
Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) of this Growth Management Plan.
This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal".
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
B. Objectives Analysis:
OBJECTIVE 1:
The County shall utilize the Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR)
process to update the Drainage Atlas Maps and Channel/Structure Inventory components of
the adopted Water Management Master Plan to verify the existing watershed basin boundaries
within Collier County. The County will also verify the design stonn capacity of the drainage
facilities within each basin, and detennine the costs necessary to maintain the facility
capacities to selected design storm standards. This information shall be used to program
operational funds in the Annual County Budget and to identify necessary capital projects and
basin studies in the Annual Capital Improvement Element Update and Amendment
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires drainage projects to be included in the County's Annual Update and
Inventory Report (AUIR), and thus the annual Capital Improvement Element and Schedule of Capital
Improvements update. The County has been diligent in adhering to this requirement. Each year the
County provides its latest AUIR to the Florida Department of Community Affairs along with its
submittal of its latest adopted Capital Improvement Element.
All mapping for the stormwater management system is now done in the GIS, and "Drainage Atlas
Maps" are no longer utilized, This reference should be changed to identify the GIS and update its
connection with the AUIR process.
Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written.
This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
[fublic Comment from January 25, 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting the County should re-
evaluate monitoring and maintenance procedures for nutrient loads/pollution/water quality. ]
OBJECTIVE 2:
The County shall maintain adopted drainage level of service standards for basins and sub-
basins identified in the Water Management Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage level of
service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed
management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of this Growth Management Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The purpose of this Objective and its policies is to maintain and implement the County's adopted
drainage LOS standards for its established drainage basins. Implementation provisions are based in the
CCME. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as
written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
Policy Relevance:
There are two (2) policies within this Objective.
Policy 2.1:
The following levels of service for drainage are hereby adopted for the purpose of issuing
development permits. Upon completion of each associated Watershed Management Plan, the
level of service will be modified, if warranted.
A. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in
Collier County Ordinance Numbers 74-50, 90-10 and 2001-27, and Land Development
Code Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended.
B. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those
existing Levels of Service identified (by design stonn return frequency event) by the
completed Water Management Master Plan as follows:
LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS
BASIN
LEVEL OF
SERVICE
MAIN GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM
Main Golden Gate Canal Basin
Cypress Canal Basin
Harvey Canal Basin
1-75 Canal Basin
Green Canal Basin
Airport Road Canal South Basin
Corkscrew Canal Basin
Orange Tree Canal Basin
951 Canal Central Basin
DISTRICT NO.6 SYSTEM
Rock Creek Basin
C-4 Canal Basin
Lely Main Canal Basin
Lely Canal Branch Basin
Lely Manor Canal Basin
Haldeman Creek Basin
Winter Park Outlet Basin
COCOHATCHEE RIVER SYSTEM
Cocohatchee River Basin
Pine Ridge Canal Basin
Palm River Canal Basin
West Branch Cocohatchee River Basin
East Branch Cocohatchee River Basin
Airport Road Canal North Basin
951 Canal North Basin
GORDON RIVER EXTENSION
Gordon River Extension Basin
Goodlette-Frank Road Ditch Basin
HENDERSON CREEK BASIN
Henderson Creek Basin
o
o
D
D
C
D
D
D
C
D
C
o
o
o
D
D
D
C
o
C
D
D
D
o
D
o
3
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS
BASIN LEVEL OF SERVICE
FAKA-UNION SYSTEM
Faka-Union Canal Basin D
Miller Canal Basin D
Merritt Canal Basin C
Prairie Canal Basin C
SOUTHERN COASTAL BASIN
US-41 Outfall Swale No.1 Basin D
US-41 Outfall Swale No.2 Basin D
Seminole Park Outlet Basin C
BARRON RIVER SYSTEM
Okaloacoochee Slough Basin D
Barron River Canal North Basin C
Urban Immokalee Basin C
MISCELLANEOUS INTERIOR WETLAND SYSTEMS
Corkscrew Slough Basin D
lbis Policy lists standards for the various identified drainage basins.
The LOSS for stormwater management systems appearing in Policy 2.1 above is one of two locations
within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5; subsection "c" in
the Capital Improvement Element. lbis dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy,
except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single
location selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then
the crn could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could
elaborate on the figures. lbis Policy will remain relevant in its reconciled format.
[flanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Supporting staff
suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the CIE, with this Sub-Element being revised to
direct readers to the CIE for this information}
[flanning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Questioning whether
the use of" as amended" in this context makes this Policy self amending.]
OBJECTIVE 3:
The County shall maintain and annually update a five-year schedule of capital improvements
for water management facilities in confonnance with the annual review process described
within the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Like other types of capital improvements, drainage projects are included in annual updates to the Five-
Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, and thus the County's Annual Budget for each fiscal year.
This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. 'Ibis Objective should
be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
Policy Relevance:
4
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
There are four policies within this Objective.
Policy 3.4:
County improvements to, and maintenance of, existing drainage facilities shall be a priority
over new construction projects in the urban and estates designated areas (exclusive of
Southern Golden Gate Estates).
This Policy requires that the County give major emphasis to drainage improvements in the Estates and
Urban Areas, as opposed to other portions of the County. This emphasis toward these improvements is
considered in the County's Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This Policy remains relevant
and should be retained as written.
[Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR WorkshoTJ - Suggesting that the
language in this Policy is ambiguous and needs revision to provide clarity and avoid an interpretation
that the improvement and maintenance of existing facilities Countywide are a priority over new
projects in the Estates - as this is not the case. SGGE is no longer open to development, so no
facilities have priority there. ]
OBJECTIVE 4:
The County shall develop and maintain policies and programs to correct existing deficiencies
and to provide for future facility needs in accordance with the annual work program referenced
in the adopted Water Management Master Plan.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective requires the County maintain its drainage work program to correct deficiencies and
provide for future need. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained,
essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective"
such as, Develop and maintain policies and programs to correct existing deficiencies and to
provide for future facility needs in accordance with the annual work program referenced in the
adopted Water Management Master Plan.
[Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that watershed management
and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.]
[f!,nvironmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!ust 11. 2010 EAR WorkshoTJ -
Emphasizing the importance of preparing and following an annual work program.]
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective.
Policy 4.1 :
Water management projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in
the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. These projects shall be undertaken in
coordination with the Big Cypress Basin/South Florida Water Management District 5 Year Plan.
This Policy requires water management projects to be undertaken in accordance with the procedures
outlined within the Capital Improvements Element, and that such projects be coordinated with the Big
5
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
Cypress Basin Board and the South Florida Water Management District. (It is worth noting here that,
in Collier County the Big Cypress Basin Board, an arm of the South Florida Water Management
District, maintains the major drainageways while Collier County maintains the tributary systems.)
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained if re-written, Post EAC Workshop comment:
The Big Cypress Basin is not going to publish the 5-year plan in this format (County has been doing
this since the early 1980s). Beginning this year the new document will be called Big Cypress Basin
Strategic Plan 2010-2015. Properly revise reference to the "Strategic Plan" without the date
reference.
Policy 4.1
County capital stormwater management projects shall be undertaken in accordance with
the schedule provided in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. These projects
shall be undertaken in coordination with the Big Cypress Basin Strategic Plan.
[Public Comment from March 15, 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting a number of these 'other
regulatory agencies' be identified, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), as
those among whom water resource management is coordinated - including surface water, stormwater,
and water supplies for municipal services.]
OBJECTIVE 5:
The County shall continue to regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the
functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas.
Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning
process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land
Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended).
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective provides for the protection of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer
recharge areas. This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This
Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
[Planning Commission (CCPe) Comment from AUVlst 27. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Questioning whether
the use of "as amended" in this context makes this Objective self amending.]
OBJECTIVE 6:
The County shall protect the functions of natural drainage features through the application of
standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stonnwater management
systems. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the watershed management
planning process identified within Goal 2 and Objective 2.1 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. This objective is made measurable
through the following policies:
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
6
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
This Objective seeks to protect natural drainage features through the imposition of stormwater
discharge quantity and quality standards. The Objective relies on its subject policies for the definition
of standards. As per Objectives 2 and 5, this Objective should be revised to reference (in general) the
objectives and policies contained in Goal 2 of the CCME, and the Watershed Management Plans
described under Objective 2.1 of the CCME, and to acknowledge that these portions of the CCME
provide guidance for protecting the functions of the County's natural drainage features. Based on the
above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. lbis Objective
should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
[Public Comment from January 25. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting that watershed
management planning needs to be about more than just water - planning should take a more holistic
approach.]
[public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that watershed management
and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.)
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from August 11. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting
that this Objective be expanded to address additional protections of natural drainage features in
roadway construction and other transportation projects, for introducing or increasing both wet and
dry detention features, andfor includingfilter, or trickle, marshes to the system.)
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective.
Policy 6.1 :
Projects shall be designed and operated so that off-site discharges will meet State water
quality standards, as set forth in Chapter 62-302.300, F.A.C., as it existed at the date of project
approval.
lbis Policy identifies a specific resource to address stormwater discharges to natural drainage features
and requires the County to meet State water quality standards. lbis Policy remains relevant and should
be retained as written.
[J!;nvironmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!Ust 11. 2010 EAR Workshop - Questioning
whether any applicable Federal water quality standards may not be incorporated into State standards
and would still apply, and if so, include proper reference to them.)
Policy 6.2:
Collier County's retention and detention requirements shall be the same as those provided in
the South Florida Water Management District's Basis of Review, as it existed at the time of
project approval.
This Policy identifies stormwater retention/detention requirements of the appropriate Water
Management District, with this document reference appearing to be out of date. lbis Policy also
mirrors other provisions found in another Public Facilities Element Sub-Element. The Pollution
Control Department implements this Policy. This Policy remains relevant and should be revised to
replace "Basis for Review, dated January 2004" with "Environmental Resource Permit Information
Manual, Volume IV, 2009".
7
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
It is also noted that the County does not adhere to the same retention and detention requirements as
those found in the resource identified. The interim watershed management regulations exceed the
SFWMD retention and detention requirements by requiring 150% of SFWMD criteria for all
developments. The SFWMD typically only requires that for projects discharging into designated
Outstanding Florida Water (OFW) sources. This Policy remains relevant and should accordingly be
further revised to reflect the increase in water quality treatment.
This Policy conflicts with CCME Objective 2.1.a. which requires 150% of the SFWMD water quality
treatment requirement. This is part of the Interim Watershed Standards.
(Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!USt 27.2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that both
the CCME and this Policy properly reflect the 150% figure.)
Policy 6.3:
Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a stonn event of 3 day duration and
25 year return frequency. The allowable off-site discharge rates are as follows:
a. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfslacre
(North of Vanderbilt Beach
Road)
b. Airport Road South Sub-basin 0.06 cfs/acre
(South of Vanderbilt Beach
Road)
c. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
d. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
e. Harvey Basin 0.055 cfs/acre
f. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfs/acre
g. All other areas 0.15 cfs/acre
The County may exempt projects from these allowable off-site discharge rates if any of the
following applies:
1. The project is exempt from allowable off-site discharge limitations pursuant to Section
40E-400.315, FAC.
2. The project is part of an existing SFWMD pennit, which allows discharge rates different
than those listed above.
3. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off-site at a rate higher than
those listed above. The documentation required for this purpose shall be prepared by a
registered professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes
the applicable criteria in the "SFWMD Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Penn it
Applications". The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and
SFWMD staff. The study shall include the following site-specific infonnation:
a. Topography
b. Soil types and soil storage volume
c. Vegetation types
8
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
d. Antecedent conditions
e. Design rainfall hydrograph
f. Depression storage capacity
g. Receiving water hydrograph, and
h. Other relevant hydrologic and hydraulic data.
Using the above information, a hydrologic and hydraulic model shall be developed which
demonstrates the higher off-site discharge rate.
lbis Policy commits the County to using the 3-day, 25-year storm event as a discharge rate standard.
The Policy also contains a list of calculated discharge rates for identified basins and sub-basins. lbis
Policy references discharge requirements of the appropriate Water Management District, with this
document reference appearing to be out of date. lbis Policy also mirrors other provisions found in
another Public Facilities Element Sub-Element. The Pollution Control Department implements this
Policy. This Policy remains relevant and should be revised to replace "Basis for Review for
Environmental Resource Permit Applications" with "Environmental Resource Permit Information
Manual, Volume IV, 2009".
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!Ust 11.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting
that the County consider setting new limitations, or maximums for these exempt projects to provide
additional protections of natural drainage features.}
CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR
POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697.
{Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 27.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies followingfrom the adoption of HB 697 may
be misplaced and consideration for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address
multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location , and should be removed from the/ as a
proposed revision.}
9
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Public Facilities Element - Natural Groundwater Aquifer Rechal"2:e Sub-Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper
formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning
with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction,
such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow
Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
Goal - revisions to reflect all that aquifer recharge area protection entails, and its interdependence
with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting
Objective 1 - revisions to extend time allowed to complete a periodic task; reformatting
Policy 1.1 - minor revision.
Policy 1.2 - consider revision to identify potable water well field locations in the greater Immokalee
area.
Policy 1.5 - consider revision to identify department involved with preparing and utilizing the
referenced publication; minor revision to update document cite; verify that "as amended" may be
used in this context.
Objective 2 - reformatting.
Policy 2.2 - minor revision to update document cite.
Objective 3 - reformatting.
Policy 3.3 - consider revision to reflect coordinated monitoring efforts, and point out monitoring
efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area.
1
NGWAR SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 3.5 - consider revision to point out efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area
Objective 4 - reformatting.
Policy 4.1 - minor revision to reference another section in same document.
Objective 5 - revisions, including reformatting; removal of undefined term from further use in this
Objective and its subsequent Policies.
Policy 5.5 - modify to reduce extent of specificity.
NGWAR Sub-Element - Attached Documents - Numerous changes, with direction to cross-check
GMP locations where similar references to maps & figures are found.
2
NGWAR SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Public Facilities Element -Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is defined within its single
Goal, which reads as follows:
THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER
RECHARGE AREAS FROM ACTIVITIES THAT COULD DEGRADE AND/OR CONTAMINATE THE
QUALITY OF GROUNDWATER.
The intent of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is to assure the provision of
efficient and economical services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs
for the protection of groundwater recharge areas while also assuring public health and safety in
accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, F.A.c., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008
included the initial step toward re-narning of the "Drainage" Sub-Element to the "Stormwater
Management" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all references to that Sub-Element
found in this Sub-Element and throughout the Growth Management Plan.
Note that, in one respect, there is overlap in the intended purpose of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge and Drainage Sub-Elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge areas. However, the
emphasis of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is on groundwater protection,
whereas the emphasis of the Drainage Sub-Element is on surface water protection. For an evaluation
of the Drainage Sub-Element, refer to the Drainage Section of this Report. In addition to the overlap
of policies within the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Drainage Sub-Elements, there is also
an overlap between the intended purpose of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element
and Goal 2 of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (refer to the CCME Section of this
Report), including the Watershed Management Plans discussed under Objective 2.1 of the CCME.
EAR-based amendments made to those sections should be reflected in this Sub-Element, as necessary.
As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting
Objectives and Policies.
The provision of public facilities and services for aquifer recharge area protection and watershed
management, floodplain management and flood protection, potable water supply, and stormwater
management are planned in correlation with future land use projections. lbis Goal should be
expanded to fully capture the County's goals in these areas and ensure colaboration in implementing
Objectives and applying Policies. These interdepartmental colaborations should also be recognized,
and strengthend if necessary, in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) and
Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) of this Growth Management Plan.y
This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal".
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
[fublic Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Questioning the status of and adherence
to the Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan and the Comprehensive Water Resource
Management Plan; another, suggesting that watershed management and water resource management
should take a more holistic approach.]
B. Objectives Analysis:
General Analysis:
The Sub-Element Objectives and Policies are implemented primarily by the Collier County Pollution
Control & Prevention Department. The Objectives and Policies speak generically about groundwater
protection and the identification and protection of aquifer recharge areas. However, virtually all of the
Department's work is related to County potable water wellfields (>100,000 GP D design) in
accordance with Land Development Code Section 3.06.00 - Groundwater Protection.
OBJECTIVE 1 (MAPPING AND DELINEATION OF RECHARGE AREAS):
The County shall continue to review every two years, and revise as necessary, existing map
delineations of County potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to contamination from
nearby land development and other surface activities. The biennial review and any
subsequent map revisions will be based on geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, and updated
anthropogenic contaminant data aggregated since the previous revision.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis:
Currently, Collier County's Pollution Control and Prevention Department uses an advanced 3-
dimensional computer model to calculate Wellfield Risk Management Zones around significantly sized
existing and planned potable water wellfields (>100,000 GPD design). These Wellfield Risk
Management Zones, in the form of maps, are adopted into the County's Land Development Code
3.06.00 Groundwater Protection and placed on the County's Zoning Maps for County planners to use
when regulating land development with the intent of protecting potable water wellfields from pollution
sources.
This Objective should be revised to replace "review every two years" with "review every three years"
and "The biennial review" with "The three year review".
The proposed amendments for Objective 1 provides adequate time (3 years) for the development of the
proposed Wellfield Risk Management Zones. adoption of the proposed Wellfield Risk Management
Zones into Collier County's Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element (Maps), and
adoption of the proposed Wellfield Risk Management Zones into Collier County's Land Development
Code, Section 3.06 "Ground Water Protection." The two years that are presently allotted have been
found to be insufficient to complete this objective. The recommended language amendment will
provide sufficient time (3 years) to complete this objective.
Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as rewritten.
This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
[public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Questioning the status of and
responsibility for monitoring and maintaining our water resources.]
Policy Relevance:
There are five (5) policies within this Objective.
Policy 1.1:
The County shall revise and update its 3-dimensional computer models of ground water flow
around public water supply wellfields, as additional data (e.g., withdrawal rates, numbers and
locations of wells within wellfields, and hydrogeologic information) become available.
This Policy requires that groundwater flow around wellfield modeling be revised, as pertinent data is
made available. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. There is one recommended
change. The term "ground water" should be replaced by "groundwater" in this Policy, and
throughout the remainder of this Sub-Element and entire GMP wherever informally used [not in title of
formal document). This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as revised.
Policy 1.2:
The County shall identify those County potable water wellfields, or portions of wellfields,
which are susceptible to contamination, caused by adjacent or nearby land uses, drainage
patterns, geomorphic conditions, soil properties, and/or hydrogeologic factors, including the
presence or absence of confining units. This information shall be revised and updated as
necessary.
lbis Policy requires that the identification of wellfields susceptible to contamination be revised, as
pertinent updates are made available. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy.
There are no recommended changes. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!Ust 11.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting
that potable water wellfield identification include locations in the greater Immokalee area.]
Policy 1.3:
The County shall maintain and update data on existing land uses and land use activities that
possess the greatest potential for ground water contamination.
This Policy requires the County to monitor land uses and land use activities to gauge their potential to
contaminate groundwater. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. There are no
recommended changes. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.
(Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Questioning the status of and
responsibility for monitoring and maintaining our water resources.)
Policy 1.5:
This Sub-Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the Surficial and
Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and Hawthorne Aquifers,
as described in the South Florida Water Management Districfs official publications dated April,
2000 (and scheduled to be published in 2006).
3
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT-
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
lbis Policy requires the County to reference a South Florida Water Management District publication to
keep current its computer model. A general reference to a 2006 publication however, potentially limits
the County's ability to keep this data current in future years as subsequent editions are published. The
Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. The "official publications" incorporated by
reference are the District's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plans. A version was first published in
2000 in three parts: a Planning Document, a Support Document and the Appendices Document. There
was an update in the 2005-2006 timeframe - also published in multiple parts. There is an update
ongoing that may be completed in the 2010-2011 timeframe.
This Policy remains otherwise relevant and should be retained and revised to identify the specific
SFWMD publication or publications being incorporated by reference into this Sub-Element, such as,
This Sub-Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the Surficial and
Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and Hawthorne Aquifers, as
described in the South Florida Water Management District's Lower West Coast Water Supply
Plan, as amended.
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!ust 11.2010 EAR Workshov - Questioning
whether the County department involved with preparing and utilizing this publication should be
identified by this Policy.)
[flanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Questioning whether
the use of "as amended" in this context would make this Policy self amending.)
OBJECTIVE 2 (PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY):
Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective seeks to protect natural groundwater aquifer recharge features through the imposition of
quantity and quality standards.
Collier County has implemented numerous proactive programs designed to protect Collier County S
groundwater quality from man-made pollution sources and hence remain compliant with this
Objective. In addition, Collier County has also developed programs designed to respond to pollution
releases into the environment and to monitor their satisfactory cleanup. Finally, the Collier County
Pollution Control & Prevention Department has developed strong working relationships with the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Collier County Environmental Health and
Engineering Department, South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin Board and the
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services that enhance the County s ability to
effectively coordinate efforts to meet this Objective.
Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written.
This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective" such as, Protect
natural aquifer recharge areas to ensure the highest water quality practical toward meeting
applicable Federal and State water quality standards for ground water, or, Protect groundwater
4
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
from pollutant discharges that may cause exceedance of applicable Federal and State water
quality standards; followed by a "policy", such as:
Policy 2.0.1:
The County shall protect groundwater from pollutant discharges that might cause exceedance of
applicable Federal and State water quality standards.
{Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting a number of these 'other
regulatory agencies' be identified, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and the Us. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), as
those among whom water resource management is coordinated - including surface water, stormwater,
and water supplies for municipal services.]
Policy Relevance:
There are four (4) policies within this Objective.
Policy 2.2:
Non-agricultural developments requiring an Environmental Resources Pennit from the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall preserve groundwater recharge
characteristics as required by the SFWMD and as set forth in the SFWMD's Basis for Review,
dated January 2004 and as regularly updated. Ground water recharge shall also be protected
through the application of the retention/detention requirements and allowable off-site
discharge rates for non-agricultural developments specified in Policies 6.2 and 6.3 in the
Drainage Sub-Element.
This Policy identifies groundwater protection requirements of the appropriate Water Management
District, with this document reference appearing to be out of date. This Policy also refers to other
provisions found in another Public Facilities Element Sub-Element. The Pollution Control Department
implements this Policy This Policy should be revised to replace "Basis for Review, dated January
2004" with "Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume m 2009".
OBJECTIVE 3 (GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING):
The County shall continue to collect and evaluate ground water quality data, identifying
ambient water quality values and trends, comparing analyzed concentrations to Florida
Ground Water Guidance Concentrations, and providing infonnation to water resources
planning and management entities, and to the general public.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires Collier County to collect and analyze groundwater quality data for
comparison to State Standards, and to be able to provide information on analysis results to all
interested parties_ Presently Collier County S Pollution Control and Prevention Department samples a
trend network of groundwater monitoring wells semi-annually, and reports on the data annually In
addition, a Golden Gate Groundwater Baseline Monitoring Report had been completed in 2004, which
assessed the groundwater quality data obtained from 84 residential potable water wells. Residents
were provided groundwater laboratory results for the well they owned. A follow-up Golden Gate
5
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
Estates study is presently underway, which will compare this most recent groundwater quality data
with the historical 2004 reported data to determine water quality trends.
Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written.
This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
{Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting that watershed management
and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.]
Policy Relevance:
There are five (5) policies within this Objective.
Policy 3.3:
The County will annually assess its groundwater quality monitoring data to detennine whether
monitoring activities and County Ordinances require expansion, modification or reduction.
This Policy requires the County to regularly re-assess its groundwater quality monitoring efforts. This
Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from August 11. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting
the County coordinate with SFWMD staff to monitor our water resources for salt water intrusion and
tracking salinity trends.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from August 11. 2010 EAR Workshov -
Emphasizing the importance of ongoing monitoring efforts for both quality and availability in the
greater Golden Gate Estates area. Anecdotal evidence showing that the shallower wells run dry in the
dry-weather seasons of the year should not be overlooked.]
Policy 3.5:
Collier County shall continue to conduct water resource planning with appropriate County,
City of Naples, and SFWMD staff to provide for ground water resource development,
utilization, and conservation.
This Policy requires the County to coordinate their water resource planning efforts with other agencies.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.
[fublic Comment from March 15.2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting a number of these 'other
regulatory agencies' be identified, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), as
those among whom water resource management is coordinated - including surface water, stormwater,
and water supplies for municipal services.]
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!ust 11. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting
that water resource planning efforts include the greater Golden Gate Estates area, and take into
consideration public health factors.]
6
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE: 4 (PUBLIC EDUCATION WITH REGARD TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION
ISSUES):
The County shall continue current activities of providing the public with educational materials
concerning ground water protection issues in Collier County. These may include, but shall not
be limited to, the preparation of annual technical publications of ground water quality data, an
infonnational website for groundwater quality issues, general infonnation publications,
establishment of a speakers' bureau, K-12 classroom presentations, and in-service teacher
workshops and seminars.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective requires continuation of County public educational activities with regard to
groundwater protection issues. The Pollution Control & Prevention Department maintains a website
that identifies all of the programs designed to protect the County s groundwater from pollution. The
team prepares and distributes an Annual Newsletter designed to educate businesses on the proper
method of managing the hazardous wastes they generate. Team members have also spoken before
various groups/organizations about what Pollution Control does and the team remains available to
answer any questions the public, regulatory community, and/or policy makers may have.
Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written.
This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective".
Policy Relevance:
There are two (2) policies within this Objective.
Policy 4.1 :
The County shall continue to advise the public on the appropriate disposal methods for
hazardous wastes, for the purpose of reducing or avoiding the potential for groundwater
contamination. In performing this task, the County may utilize the public educational
measures listed within Objective 4 of this Sub-Element, or any other measures which may be
appropriate.
lbis Policy requires the development of a public awareness program relative to hazardous waste
disposal issues. lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. The reference to
"Objective 4" should be revised to correspond to the reformatting of said Objective, as applicable.
7
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 5 (PROTECTION OF CRITICAL RECHARGE AREAS AND GROUNDWATER
RESOURCES):
The County shall implement plans to preserve critical ground water recharge areas and
ground water resources, and will review, evaluate, and revise (if warranted) those plans and
actions, based on the best available geologic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and anthropogenic
contaminant data.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
lbis Objective shares portions of its stated intent with Objectives 1, 2 and 3 above. lbis Objective
focuses the County's responsibilities on "critical" recharge areas and resources, whereas the above
Objectives identify all recharge areas and resources related to groundwater protection. Protecting
water quality and minimizing flood hazards employ watershed-based approaches that balance
environmental, economic and engineering considerations to meet these standards. This Objective is
being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be revised to
replace "implement" with "continue implementing" and rephrased to improve its formatting as an
"objective" .
[public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting that watershed management
and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.]
{Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the
use of the term "critical" has no clear definition and should be removed from this Objective and
where found in its subsequent Policies.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from November 3. 2010 EAR Adoption Hearing-
Concurring with the CCPC suggestion to remove the term "critical" from these entries.]
Policy Relevance:
There are five (5) policies within this Objective.
Policy 5.5:
Collier County shall continue to operate and maintain a hazardous waste collection facility.
The facility shall operate five (5) days per week and will accept household and small business
hazardous wastes. Additionally, the County shall continue to hold its hazardous waste
collection day at least twice per year targeting residential households but also allowing small
businesses to participate.
This Policy requires the County to continue operating its hazardous waste collection facility. This
Policy remains relevant, but provides a level of specificity regarding days and hours of operation that
is not necessary in a comprehensive planning document. This Policy remains relevant nonetheless and
should be retained if rewritten to provide a lesser amount of specificity appropriate for the GMP.
8
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR
POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697.
[flanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov- Suggesting that the
amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies following from the adoption of HE 697may
be misplaced and consideration for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address
multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location . and should be removed from the! as a
proposed revision.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from November 3. 2010 EAR Adovtion Hearinf!-
Concurring with the CCPC suggestion to remove the HE 697 changes from this Sub-Element and
consolidate them at another location.]
C. Attached Documents Analysis:
Map 1 Groundwater recharge to the Surficial Aquifer
This map should be updated.
Map 2 Groundwater recharge to the Lower Tamiami Aquifer
This map should be updated.
9
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
Pages 10 and 11 Blank
Public Facilities Element - Drainage Sub-Element
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing
......
.....
o
......
d)
0"
r r
I .
I
I
J
I
1Q)
10>
, '-
1(0 '-
I ..c (0
.iU,-Q)L.,
~J"", co ~. '"
, J \U ........... \.U
. !~Q)= Q)
I! ~.<O ~
: '- :- 1!') ::-
I Q) - -
I i~Cf) 1<0
1_1 ::J ~ ('i) LO
i crv ~^
i c::( I .1
lro'u'll
J._ .
11' U ....,
r~U
; I (j)
~c
!
I
r
I
I
t
It)
0>
0>
~
f-
I
m
:J
<(
r-:
N
C")
~
c
o
~
:0
:J
Cl..
o
~
~
LL
(J)
H
Q)
u
'-
:J
o
en
i
j
j
1
I
i
~
i
I
I
I
o
......
(])
0>
I- L.-
eu (])
.c '+-
u'-
Q) :::5
1-0-
1...<(
(])-
......co
0]'-
~.(.)
-o't:
c:::5
:::5(f)
e Q)
05
I
..__u__L_12 I
,
l-
1
'-
.2
"OC'?
mien
mcn~
a.cn N
~I;::
a. !l: ~I
-I
j
I
i
T-
(/)I~
, /' (]) '!
/' .~-=.~ I.()
'-=:::::: !:
c:::::: "
ii
II
!Ie
i
i
-j
0..
ro
~
o
......
o
N
~
--
00
o
V)
\0
N
,......,
II
"0
.-
....
c
d)
S
;:s
u
o
"0
1:'-'
K
0...
CI)
C':1
....l
C
d)
S
;:s
u
o
Q
~
o
..c:
CI)
--
CI)
d)
--<
;:s
"0
o
8
"::l
d)
c
;>
o
~
d)
.-
--<
--<
o
u
~
~
~
~
0..
....
:E
-
'+-<
o
-
Cl,)
on
tIl
A.
P"""T
I I
I
I
I
I.
I
"t
i'
,
"!:
!
l.():
(j)
(j)
.......-
0)
01
I l-
i- en
.c
() L-
:0) . ~
. a:: I- CO CD I-
:1- m<D~m
i ~ <D ~__ <D
1,- >--- = ~
i :J."",,-= ~
i 0"= '~N;-
! <( f'-- r-, ~
.- I N
;-!Eor-~^
,CO
.1 j "E
'en
il-
_' I-
0)
i ~.
o
.-J
..r-- .,
~--"-
i
I
j
i
r
j
L.o.
C>
:::I
<.(
r-:
N
(Y)
~
C
o
:;::;
en
.Q
..0
:::I
a..
o
2
~
LL
(/)
II
Q)
u
~
:::I
I
nlll
N
0..
CO
~
L..
oJE
+J:J
(])
e><(
CO'-
..cE
u CO
(]).-
L.. E
L.. CO
21-
<Olo...
5: m
-03:
co
::J..J
em
<.9-5
l-
.E
-0'9
<l>,m
Co 0> ~.
a. 0> .~. --;
~,~
o..oc~
o
n..-
I:
it
OOii
'~G>n
- '. - '~[f LO
il
j!
I!
:,
la
,,__ .______".__~---... 13
---<
-,
-1
I
,
I
--~
r
,
I
I
i
~
o
........
o
N
N
-
00
0'1
-.::t
\0
N
........
II
:'S!
.......
=
CI,)
S
:::l
t)
o
"'0
c:--.
~
0-
<I)
c;l
'5
s
5
o
Cl
~
o
...r:::
C.I)
-
<I)
CI,)
'3
"'0
o
S
~
CI,)
=
;>
o
....0
c3
t)
:i
~
~
::;::;
.&
.......
...r:::
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Housing Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper
formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below.
Goal: General statement that defmes what the Element will
ultimately achieve.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal;
describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s).
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to
achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s).
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department
name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective
and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical
changes.
Objective 1:
Evaluate for possible elimination of the affordable-workforce housing
annual production rate requirement, or establish a new rate that is
commensurate with the County's projected demand - based on County
inventory, affordable-workforce units approved, but not yet built, and
market conditions
Policy 1.1:
Revise to reflect that the County presently has affordable-housing interlocal
agreements with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island; and, add
a requirement that the municipalities shall re-evaluate their respective
interlocal agreements with the County every three years.
Policy 1.4
Revise to ensure consistency with Section 163.3177(f) 1.g., Florida
Statutes, and provide that no one affordable-workforce housing category is
concentrated within anyone geographic area
Objective 2:
Modify to reflect the removal of the HOC reference and their stated
mission; add the phrase "for- profit and not- for-profit providers of
affordable-workforce housing" before the phrase, "shall assist Collier
County... "; and, delete the references to "fifteen" percent and "} ,000" units
and replace with a new rate that is commensurate with the County's
projected demand - based on County inventory, affordable-workforce units
1
HOUSING ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 2.1:
Policy 2.9:
Policy 2.10:
Policy 2.11:
Policy 3.5:
Policy 3.7:
Objective 4:
Policy 4.3:
Policy 5.4:
Policy 5.6:
Policy 5.7:
Objective 6:
Objective 7:
Objective 8:
Policy 8.1:
Policy 8.2:
Policy 8.3:
approved, but not yet built, and market conditions, or evaluate for possible
elimination of the affordable-workforce housing annual production rate
requirement
Revise to remove agency reference, as it is no longer relevant
Revise to reflect new timeline for task completion
Revise to reflect departmental name change and program addition
Revise to replace the specific departmental reference with a general
reference to the County
Revise to include a date for task completion
Revise to include a date for task completion
Revise to remove reference to survey being conducted by the City of
Naples
Revise to include a date for task completion
Revise to include a date for task completion
Revise to include a date for task completion
Revise date to coincide with the amended survey commission date to be
established in Policy 5.6.
Revise to delete the term, "group care facilities" and replace with the term,
"group housing and Continuing Care Retirement Centers"
Revise to delete the term, "Urban Coastal Fringe" and replace with the
term, "Coastal High Hazard Area"
Modify to remove the restriction that rehabilitated units must be located only in
the Immokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the Rural
Lands Stewardship Area.
Modify to remove reference to "non-conforming" residences in order to
correlate with the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element
Delete, as Policy objective has been completed
Modify to reflect completion of survey and provide a reference that
activities are ongoing
2
HOUSING ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 8.6:
Objective 9:
Policy 9.1:
Policy 9.2:
Policy 9.3
Policy 9.4:
Policy 9.5:
Revise to remove second sentence
Staff recommends creating a new Objective based on the 2009 adoption of
lIB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies
Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption ofHB
697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies
Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB
697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies
Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB
697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies
Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of lIB
697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies
Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of lIB
697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies
3
HOUSING ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of Successes and Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Housing Element
A. Introduction and Background
The purpose of the Housing Element is to provide guidance to the County in developing appropriate
policies and programs which demonstrate the County's commitment to meet any identified and
projected deficits in the supply of housing. Further, the stated Goal of the Housing Element is to
provide an adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing for all residents of Collier
County. In order to accomplish this goal, the County has implemented strategies aimed at the
development of new residential units and the rehabilitation or demolition of substandard units.
During the planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), the County has
successfully administered various State and Federal programs, including but not limited to,
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds, HOME Investment Partnerships
Program (HOME) entitlement funds, Emergency Shelter Grant funds, State Housing Initiatives
Partnership (SHIP) funds, and funds authorized by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 -
all of which funded numerous development and redevelopment activities. The range of funded
activities includes, but is not limited to, a single family unit rehabilitation program, multi-family
affordable rental unit development, park and infrastructure development, redevelopment of abandoned
and foreclosed homes, and homebuyer education programs. In total, during this planning period, the
County has assisted individuals and families with down payment and closing costs in the amount of
$11,571,965; funded residential rehabilitation projects in the amount of $3,1 08,884; and, assisted in the
development of affordable-workforce housing projects by deferring impact fees in the amount of
$9,723,672.68.
The County has been successful in reducing the number of substandard housing units, preserving
historical and archeological resources, stabilizing neighborhoods by rehabilitating residential units, and
encouraging development of, or commitments to develop, affordable-workforce housing within the
County, through the establishment and funding of programs, and adoption of policies and regulations,
aimed at achieving the County's housing objectives. However, notwithstanding these successes, the
County's objective of creating 1,000 new affordable-workforce housing units each year during the
evaluation period for this EAR has not been achieved. The County has approved approximately 4,214
affordable-workforce units to be built, but only 728 of those units have been constructed.
Recent cost-burdened household data, from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing
Studies (July 2010), indicate that in 2010 approximately 35,942 residents are cost burdened, spending
greater than thirty percent of their household income on housing related expenses, and by 2030 that
number is expected to grow to 52,737 households. The data in Table L further indicate that over a 20-
year period the average annual demand for affordable units will be approximately 840 units. This
figure reveals an approximate 160 unit per year decrease in the affordable housing demand over the
previous figure of 1,000 units recommended in the 2004 EAR.
1
Housing Element
Table 1.
Years
Average Annual Increase in
Cost Burdened Households
2010 - 2015
2015 - 2020
2020 - 2025
2025 - 2030
856 Units/Year
Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010
The above data suggest that the County can reduce the annual production rate of affordable-workforce
housing units. Further supporting this position is an estimated 3,486 affordable-workforce units
approved, but not built, and the current availability of unrestricted affordable housing supply in the
market as a result of the economic downturn across the State.
The recent decline in the housing market has increased affordability; however, it's important to note
that these units are unrestricted (not subject to regulatory control of rental or sale price, occupant
income level, time period to remain affordable, etc.), and are likely to increase in value as market
conditions change over time. This in turn would reduce the affordable-workforce housing supply in
the County. Regarding the approved, but not yet built units, it is unknown how many of those units
will be built and when they would become available.
The Housing Element should continue to include a specific requirement for the provision of affordable
housing to ensure that its goal, to provide an adequate supply of safe, decent and affordable housing
for all residents of Collier County, is achieved. Continuing to secure "restricted" affordable-workforce
housing units will reduce the long-term demand and increase the affordable-workforce housing supply
in the County.
B. Objective Analysis
OBJECTIVE 1:
The number of new affordable-workforce housing units shall increase by at least fifteen
percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than 1,000 units
per year averaged over a five-year period in an effort to continue meeting the current and
future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low and moderate incomes, including
households with special needs such as rural and fannworker housing in rural Collier County.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This objective has not been met. During years 2005-2009, the review period for this EAR, there have
been approximately 4,214 affordable-workforce units approved to be built and approximately 728 units
built in Collier County.
Estimates from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies indicate that the
increase in cost burdened households does not reach or exceed 1,000 units per year. The following is a
summary of the projected increases in cost burdened households in Collier County through year 2030.
2
Housing Element
Average Annual Increase
Years In Cost-Burdened Households
2010 - 2015 732 units/year
2015 - 2020 881 units/year
2020 - 2025 890 units/year
2025 - 2030 856 units/year
Source: University of Florida Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, July 2010
As reflected above, the average annual increase in cost burdened households is not expected to exceed
890 units per year; the projections reveal a 160 unit per year need less than the current 1,000 unit
requirement. lbis suggests that the Housing Element should be amended to reduce the minimum
annual unit production of affordable-workforce housing. Further analyses of the above data show an
annual average over 20 a year period to be 840 units. A newly revised minimum unit per year
production of at least 10 percent of all units approved, but not less than 850 units per year built, may be
more appropriate based on the available data.
The Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect an annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate of at least ten percent of all units
approved, but not less than 850 units constructed per year.
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting to reduce
the proposed affordable-workforce housing unit production figure of 850 units to 500 units to account
for the future supply of affordable-workforce units approved, but not yet built, and the existing
affordable-workforce housing supply, resulting from declining home prices caused by the economic
downturn.
StafJComment Post December 7. 2010 Planning Commission (CCPC) Adoption Hearing - Suggesting
that staff work with the Department of Community Affairs to determine the appropriate number of
affordable-workforce housing units to be constructed annually to meet demand within the County. [The
BCC directed staff to include the market rate inventory with the EAR support data on 12/14/10.]
Board of Countv Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing -
Evaluate for possible elimination of the affordable-workforce housing annual production rate
requirement, or establish a new rate that is commensurate with the County's projected demand -
based on County inventory, affordable-workforce units approved, but not yet built, and market
conditions.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 1.1:
Collier County shall pursue interlocal agreements with the City of Naples, the City of Marco
Island, and Everglades City to require that each city provide their proportionate share of
affordable-workforce housing units (or the financial equivalent). Each city's proportionate
share and financial equivalent will be evaluated and substantiated by the most current data,
studies, and methods available to the County.
3
Housing Element
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The County has existing interlocal agreements with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island.
These agreements identify the municipalities' affordable-workforce housing obligations, based on
current data, such as population and other methods available to the County.
Through the interlocal agreement between the County and the City of Naples, the City receives CDBG
funds and participates in the SHIP program, returning its allocated 7 percent to the County to
administer a joint affordable housing program. Through the interlocal agreement between the County
and the City of Marco Island, the City provides $50,000 dollars annually or 10 percent of the building
permit revenues, whichever is greater, to the County to administer affordable housing programs.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
that the County presently has affordable-housing interlocal agreements with the City of Naples and the
City of Marco Island; and, add a requirement that the municipalities shall re-evaluate their respective
interlocal agreements with the County every three years.
Policy 1.4:
Collier County shall seek to distribute affordable-workforce housing equitably throughout the
county where adequate infrastructure and services are available. Programs and strategies to
encourage affordable-workforce housing development may include, but are not limited to,
density by right within the Immokalee Urban area and other density bonus provisions, impact
fee deferrals, expedited permitting (fast tracking), public-private partnerships, providing
technical assistance and intergovernmental coordination.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The equitable distribution of affordable-workforce housing throughout the county has been
problematic and the location of the various affordable-workforce housing projects has been generally
driven by market forces. The success of this Policy may continue to be based on market forces until
affordable-housing incentives are adopted to encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing
in targeted areas of the County. Further, the County currently offers expedited permitting, flexible
density and technical support to encourage and promote affordable-workforce development within the
County.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
Public Comment (Communitv Meeting on 1/25/10 and 2/23/10):
Public stated that the County does not do enough to provide housing opportunities in close proximity
to employment centers, and thresholds should be established to minimize saturation of affordable
housing in a single geography.
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting the
removal of the phrase, "seek to distribute affordable-worliforce housing equitably throughout the
county" and, insertion of text within the Policy that is consistent with Section 163.3177(f) l.g.,
Florida Statutes, which states, "...avoid the concentration of affordable housing units only in specific
areas of the jurisdiction. "
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from December 7. 2010 - Suggesting that staff work with
Habitat for Humanity representatives to revise Policy text, consistent with Florida Statutes. [Habitat
representative voiced concern about proposed CCPC Policy change at the Hearing.]
4
Housing Element
Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adovtion Hearing -
Avoid the concentration of any one affordable-housing category within anyone geographic area.
OBJECTIVE 2:
The Collier County Board of County Commissioners aided in the establishment of the Collier
County Housing Development Corporation in 2003. The mission of the Housing Development
Corporation is to serve as a non-profit agency, with an executive board made up of
representatives from business, government, housing advocates, and the community at large,
which along with other not for profit agencies shall assist Collier County and its municipalities
in achieving a goal of increasing the number of affordable-workforce housing units by at least
fifteen percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than 1,000
units per year averaged over a five-year period for very-low, low and moderate income
residents of Collier County.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The mission of the Housing Development Corporation of Southwest Florida (fka The Collier County
Housing Development Corporation) has shifted its focus to foreclosure prevention and homebuyer
education. The Housing Development Corporation (HDC) is no longer an active participant in vertical
construction.
The Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be modified to
reflect the removal of the HDC reference and their stated mission; add the phrase "for- profit and not-
for-profit providers of affordable-workforce housing" before the phrase, "shall assist Collier
County..."; and, delete the references to "fifteen" percent and "1,000" units and replace with "ten"
percent and "850" units, consistent with the changes proposed in Objective 1.
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!USt 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting to insert
the affordable-worliforce housing production figure of 500 units. consistent with changes proposed in
Objective 1.
Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adovtion Hearinf! -
Evaluate for possible elimination of the affordable-worliforce housing annual production rate
requirement, or establish a new rate that is commensurate with the County's existing and projected
demand - based on County inventory, affordable-workforce units approved, but not yet built, and
market conditions.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 2.1:
Not for profit agencies, such as the Collier County Housing Development Corporation shall
assist the County in reaching its annual affordable-workforce housing goal by holding
workshops and fairs to raise awareness and understanding of housing issues in the County;
working together to purchase and develop parcels; and, contributing funds towards the
purchase of land for affordable-workforce housing projects.
5
Housing Element
Policy Achievement Analysis:
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to relect
the removal of the HDC reference, as their focus has changed to foreclosure prevention and homebuyer
education.
Public Comment (Community Meetinf!s held on 1/25/10.2/23/10 and 3/15/10):
Public stated that impact fee waivers are needed for affordable housing projects, and others stated that
impact fees should be eliminated all together for affordable housing projects_
Policy 2.9:
The County shall review the County's Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance
every two years or sooner, as necessary, and revise the Ordinance, as necessary, to reflect
changing community needs and market conditions. The purpose of the Affordable-workforce
Housing Density Bonus Ordinance shall be to encourage the blending of affordable-workforce
housing density bonus units into market rate developments as well as to support
developments exclusively providing affordable-workforce housing.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Ordinance is currently under review by the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and is
expected to be completed by December 2010.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
a new review time line of 3 years rather than 2 years, to make consistent with Section 420.9076 (4)
F.S.
Public Comment (Community Meeting held on 3/15/10):
Public stated that density bonus incentives for affordable housing development within mixed use
projects should be provided.
Policy 2.10:
The Collier County Operations Support and Housing Department shall continue to operate
affordable-workforce housing programs, in cooperation with public and private sponsors, to
provide safe, affordable-workforce housing to residents of the County's urban designated
areas and rural areas. Programs operated by the Department will continue to include, but are
not limited to:
. Impact fee deferrals
. Housing rehabilitation and emergency repairs
. Down payment and closing cost assistance
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The housing programs are working as intended. During the evaluation period for this EAR, the County
has funded approximately $9,723,672.68 in impact fee deferrals; $3,108,883.69 in housing and
rehabilitation and emergency repairs; and $11,571,964.51 in down payment and closing costs for
income qualified persons/families.
6
Housing Element
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect a
departmental name change - "Housing and Human Services Department"; and add to the listing of
programs operated by the Housing Department, "Acquisition and rehabilitation program."
Public Comment (Communilv Meetinf! held on 1/25/10).-
Public stated that the County should provide land for affordable housing.
Policy 2.11:
The Collier County Operations Support and Housing Department will continue to coordinate
with local utility providers to ensure that the necessary infrastructure and facilities for new
housing developments are in place, consistent with the County's Concurrency Management
System.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Housing Department does not currently coordinate with local utility providers.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained in some form. The Policy should be revised to
reflect the removal of the "Collier County Operations Support and Housing Department" and in its
place insert the following, "The County in coordination with for-profit and not-for-profit providers of
affordable-workforce housing development.. ."
Public Comment (Communilv Meeting held on 3/15/10)
Public stated that public transportation should be provided proximate to affordable housing.
OBJECTIVE 3:
Collier County shall continue to support and adequately fund housing programs to promote
the preservation and protection of existing, stable residential neighborhoods. This will be
accomplished through the utilization of State Housing Incentives Partnership (SHIP) and
CDBG programs including, but not limited to, down payment/closing cost assistance,
rehabilitation and emergency repair, demolition with new construction, and impact fee
deferrals.
[This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
* Policy 3.5:
The City of Naples will initiate a study of the Old Naples area to determine architectural and
development standards to protect and preserve the existing residential character of the area.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
A study has not yet been conducted. However, the City remains interested in incentives to preserve
and protect the existing residential character of the Old Naples area
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include
a date when the study must be completed so that the Policy is measurable.
7
Housing Element
* Policy 3.7:
The City of Naples will implement their housing maintenance code to address the conservation
of housing stock and the preservation and protection of residential neighborhoods.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The City considered a Housing Maintenance Code, but one has not yet been adopted. The City does
however include Neighborhood Action Plans for all recognized neighborhoods within the City as an
element of its Comprehensive Plan. Specific needs and desires of each neighborhood are established,
addressed and evaluated in those Plans.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include a
date when the study must be completed so that the Policy is measurable.
OBJECTIVE 4:
Collier County and the City of Naples will conduct a comprehensive housing survey, every
three years or sooner, for the purpose of identifying substandard dwelling units. Through
continued enforcement of County housing codes, and the provision of housing rehabilitation
or replacement programs, the number of substandard units (associated with a lack of
plumbing and/or kitchen facilities) throughout the County shall be reduced by 5% per year
through rehabilitation or demolition.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: [County]
A comprehensive housing survey has been completed in certain areas ofthe County. The surveying of
other geographies will occur in the future as funding and staff resources become available. The
County, however, will continue its enforcement activities to reduce the number of substandard units
within the county.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: [City of Naples]
A comprehensive City-wide survey of Naples has not been completed. Generally, substandard housing
units are identified by the City's Building and Code Enforcement Divisions. The City's Building and
Code Enforcement Divisions do not conduct annual surveys of housing conditions to identify
substandard units; such assessments occur only as a result of a natural disaster. Further, there have
been no units rehabbed, demolished or replaced by the City through rehabilitation or replacement
programs during this review period for this EAR. However, many units were rehabilitated by property
owners following hurricane Wilma in October of 2005.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
remove the reference to the City of Naples conducting a survey, as the City does not have this activity
programmed or funded in their work plan.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 4.3:
Review and amend the existing relocation policy of the City of Naples and the County, and
create one uniform relocation housing policy, consistent with the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development requirements.
8
Housing Element
Policy Achievement Analysis:
A uniform relocation housing policy has not yet been created for the County and the City of Naples.
Until such a policy is adopted, both the County and City of Naples will continue to abide by the
provisions of the Uniform Relocation Act.
lbis policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be updated to include
a completion date for the joint County and City uniform relocation housing policy, so that the Policy is
measurable.
OBJECTIVE 5:
Collier County and the City of Naples will annually monitor all identified historically significant
homes to determine if these structures are being conserved, maintained, and/or rehabilitated.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 5.4:
By 2008, Collier County and the City of Naples will study potential incentives to encourage the
conservation, maintenance and rehabilitation of historic homes and will make
recommendations to the City Council and to the Board of County Commissioners as to which
incentives should be adopted.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy objective has not been achieved. The Board of County Commissioners and the City
Council have not yet adopted incentives to encourage the conservation, maintenance and rehabilitation
of historic homes.
However, in December, 2005, City Council and the City's Planning Advisory Board convened a joint
meeting for the purpose of discussing a proposed historic preservation ordinance. Thereafter, planning
staff was directed to prepare a revised draft ordinance that includes stronger incentives for the
preservation of historic homes. The ordinance has not been adopted; however, the City remains
interested in incentives to preserve historic structures.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be amended to
reflect a revised completion date for the joint study between the County and the City of Naples by year
2011.
Policy 5.6:
By 2008, the Board of County Commissioners shall commission a new Historical Survey for all
of unincorporated Collier County. The Survey shall review the current status of all previously
identified historical structures and sites within the unincorporated County and shall make
recommendations as to which of these sites or structures should be nominated to the National
Register. The Survey shall also review and make similar recommendations regarding any
previously unidentified historic structures or sites.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
lbis Policy objective has not been achieved due to an inability to fund the Survey. The County
continues to rely on the Historical and Archeological Probability Map Series, updated in 1999, to
determine if a project is within an area of probability.
9
Housing Element
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the survey commission date should be
modified to reflect a future date when funding potentially would be available to the conduct the survey.
Policy 5.7:
By 2009, the Historical/Archaeological Preservation Ordinance shall be updated to include the
results of the Historical Survey and to include any relevant changes in State or Federal
regulations concerning historical properties.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
lbis Policy objective has not been achieved.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the date of the required revisions to the
Ordinance should be modified to coincide with the amended survey commission date established for
Policy 5.6.
OBJECTIVE 6:
Collier County shall monitor changes to state and federal regulations pertaining to group care
facilities, and, as necessary, amend its Land Development Code to ensure compliance.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
The County will continue monitoring all related state and federal regulations as an ongoing activity.
lbis Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting to
replace the term "group care facilities" with "group housing and Continuing Care Retirement
Centers" to broaden the purpose of the Objective.
OBJECTIVE 7:
Although mobile home parks currently exist within Collier County, as a result of the coastal
community's susceptibility to flooding and storm surges, any new mobile home parks will be
restricted to areas outside of the Urban Coastal Fringe.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
The County currently prohibits new mobile home parks within the Urban Coastal Fringe.
lbis Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting to
replace incorrect reference to the Urban Coastal Fringe with the correct reference to the "Coastal
High Hazard Area. "
OBJECTIVE 8:
Collier County shall continue to utilize SHIP, CDBG, or other funding sources and, in
partnership with Federal, State and non-profit housing agencies, will seek to provide a
minimum of 50 rehabilitated or new residential units per year for very low, low and moderate
income residents of the Immokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the
10
Housing Element
Rural Lands Stewardship Area. Families benefiting from such housing will include, but not be
limited to, fannworkers and other populations with special housing needs.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The County continues to exceed the minimum number of rehabilitation projects required by this
Objective. During the latter years of the evaluation period for this EAR, the County assisted with the
rehabilitation of 92 residential properties, and funded rehabilitation projects in the amount of
$3,108,883.69 during the entire review period for this EAR. Additionally, the County was allocated
$ 7 ,306, 755 to assist with the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes and residential
properties. As of June 2009, 35 percent of those funds have been committed for the acquisition and
rehabilitation of foreclosed properties. Further, the County was awarded funding under the Disaster
Recovery Initiative grant which has funded rehabilitation projects throughout the County.
It should be noted that the process for awarding funds to rehabilitate residential units must be
competitive, not restricted to certain geographies within the County. As a result, the County
recommends revising the Objective to remove the restriction that rehabilitated units must be located
only in the Immokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 8.1:
Collier County shall continue to pursue the policy of requiring all non-confonning or sub-
standard residences of any type within the Immokalee Urban Area to be either rehabilitated to
current housing code standards or demolished.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County transmitted the revised Immokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP) Element to the
Department of Community Affairs on June 23, 2010. This Element provides specific objectives to
promote the rehabilitation of substandard residences within the Immokalee Urban Area
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to remove
the reference to "non-conforming" residences, so that it correlates with the Master Plan revisions that
have no such policies.
Policy 8.2:
By 2008, Collier County shall complete a review of the residential density caps established
within the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element of this Growth Management Plan. Based upon
this review, the County shall determine if and where it may be appropriate to increase such
caps, so as to encourage the development of new affordable-workforce housing units for
fannworkers, very low, low and moderate income residents.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The residential density cap review was completed as part of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP)
Element re-write, transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs on June 23, 2010. The density
caps were raised in certain sub-districts to 20 units per acre. This change would allow the development
of an additional .:.!:6,730 dwelling units within the Immokalee Urban Area; presumably promoting
affordable-workforce housing developments.
11
Housing Element
lbis Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, as the Policy objective has been fulfilled.
Policy 8.3:
During 2004, the County completed a housing assessment survey of single family, multi-
family, and mobile home units and mobile home parks in the Immokalee Urban Area, in order
to detennine the number of units that do not meet the County's current health, safety and
minimum housing codes. The County shall target affordable-workforce housing and code
enforcement programs to correct the conditions.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The County has completed a housing assessment survey of the Immokalee Urban Area by the date
specified in the Policy. As part of the survey, the County identified units that did not meet the
County's minimum housing codes. The County will continue to work with area residents to correct
housing conditions, and will continue to implement programs to improve the housing stock in the
Immokalee Urban Area.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to
reflect the completion of the survey; and, include a reference identifying that activities are ongoing.
Policy 8.6:
Collier County will continue to utilize CDBG funds to provide fannworker-housing
opportunities. In addition to housing units that currently qualify for assistance under SHIP
program guidelines, special consideration of CDBG funds will be aimed at units that current
SHIP program guidelines prohibit from assistance (i.e., mobile home units). Farmworkers will
also be encouraged, through the use of multi-lingual outreach programs, to take advantage of
any other CDBG, SHIP, Local, State, Federal and private programs for which they may qualify.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to remove
the second sentence, as the process for awarding Federal and State funds is competitive and not
intended for set-asides.
This Element is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted into law in
2008, as follows:
163.3 I 77(6)(f)1.h. and i. Requires that the housing element include standards, plans and
principles to be followed in energy efficiency in the design and construction of new housing
and in the use of renewable energy resources. Ch. 2008-191, LOF. (liB 697)
Staff proposed the below Objective and associated Policies to address these requirements.
OBJECTIVE 9:
Collier County shall support housing programs that encourage the development of energy
efficient and environmentally sensitive housing.
12
Housing Element
Policy 9.1 :
The County will encourage the construction of energy efficient housing by exploring
innovative regulations that promote energy conserving and environmentally sensitive
technologies and design.
Policy 9.2:
The County shall educate the public about the economic and environmental benefits of
resource efficient design and construction.
Policy 9.3:
The County shall expedite plan review of housing projects that promote energy conservation
and design.
Policy 9.4:
The County shall continue to encourage the development of mixed housing types near
employment centers in order to reduce Green House Gas emissions and minimize carbon
footprints.
Policy 9.5:
The County shall promote the incorporation of US EPA Energy Star Building and Appliances
programs into construction and rehabilitation practices.
13
Housing Element
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper fonnatting for all
Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defmed below:
Goal: General statement defming what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with
'"TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such
as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term ''will'' and allow Policies to
specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote....., "The County shall continue to..... or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
Policy 1.1.1
Policy 1.1.5
Policy 1.1.6
Policy 1.3.1
Policy 1.4.1
Policy 1.4.2
Policy 1.5.1
Goal 2
Objective 2.1
Modification based upon BCC action to adjust level of service from stated
level.
Deletion based upon removal of facilities value as a level of service
standard by the BCC.
Revision for clarification ofthe policy.
Revision to promote alternative transportation routes to County owned
parks to promote Green House Gas reductions.
Revision for clarification of the policy.
Revision to eliminate list of governmental providers of recreational
facilities.
Revision of policy to include open space.
Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
1
Recreation and Open Space Element - Summary
Policy 2.1.1
Policy 2.1.2
Policy 2.1.3
Policy 2.1.4
Policy 2.1.5
Goal 3
Objective 3.1
Policy 3.1.1
Policy 3.1.2
Policy 3.1.3
Policy 3.1.4
Policy 3.1.5
Policy 3.1.6
Policy 3.1.7
Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Modification and relocation based upon changes to treatment of
neighborhood parks.
Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County.
Revision based upon Goal 2 proposed deletion.
Revision to reflect anticipated adoption of the Parks Master Plan.
Revision based on renumbering.
Revision based on renumbering.
Revision based on renumbering.
Revision based on renumbering and elimination of assumption of automatic
cost increases.
Revision based on renumbering.
Revision based on renumbering.
Revision based on renumbering and potentially on outcome of Parks
Master Plan.
2
Recreation and Open Space Element - Summary
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Introduction and Background
Chapter 163.3177(6)(e), Florida Statutes, requires each local government comprehensive plan to have
"A recreation and open space element indicating a comprehensive system of public and private sites
for recreation, including, but not limited to, natural reservations, parks and playgrounds, parkways,
beaches and public access to beaches, open spaces, and other recreational facilities." However,
Chapter 9J-5.014, Florida Administrative Code, which formerly contained the Florida Department of
Community Affairs' "Minimum Standards" for review of local Recreation and Open Space Elements,
has been deleted. Thus, while the Recreation and Open Space Element remains a requirement for local
comprehensive plans in the State of Florida, the format and contents of such an Element may be
tailored to local needs, provided that the intent of the Statute is met.
The Recreation and Open Space Element is divided into three sections, each of which is guided by a
specific goal. These three sections are:
. The general provision of parks, recreation facilities and open space areas for the use and
enjoyment of Collier County residents and visitors.
. The development of a countywide neighborhood park system.
. The development of a countywide regional and community park system.
These three primary goals are the aims to which the Element's objectives and policies seek to
accomplish. The second of the above goals is being proposed to be deleted as a standalone goal and is
being proposed as a policy with revisions and clarification as to the responsibility for providing and
maintaining these neighborhood facilities. The reason behind this proposed change sits with the fact
that the County does not have a Level of Service Standard for neighborhood parks, as is the case with
community and regional parks and does not provide these facilities on a regular or consistent basis, but
rather seeks individual developments to provide for localized recreational facilities. Below is the
evaluation of the existing Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Rose.
GOAL 1: PROVIDE SUFFICIENT PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE AREAS
TO MEET THE NEEDS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OF COLLIER COUNTY.
Goal 1 adequately reflects mission statement of the Parks and Recreation Department.
OBJECTIVE 1.1: Continue to ensure that a comprehensive system of parks and recreation
facilities is available from among facilities provided by the County, other governmental bodies
and the private sector.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains as written.
1
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
The Objective is designed to specifically further Goal One by providing for recreational opportunities
by the County based upon the availability of the various facilities provided by other providers and
targeting the service gaps.
Policy 1.1.1: Collier County hereby adopts the following level of service standards for facilities
and land owned by the County or available to the general public:
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD:
A. 1.2882 acres of community park land/1,OOO population (unincorporated)
B. 2.9412 acres of regional park land/1,OOO population
C. Recreation facilities - Facilities in place, which have a value (as (X) defined) of at least
$270.00 per capita of population. A Construction Cost Index (CCI) adjustment will be used to
determine the construction cost of facilities planned. The CCI that will be used will be the
prior year of the County's fiscal year budget.
1. Value will be arrived at using the per unit values for each facility type available in the
County, as set forth in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), applying the values to
the number of each facility type, adding up all values and dividing the total by the County
population.
2. Where recreation facilities provided by other governmental bodies or the private sector are
available through arrangement with the County to the public on a convenient basis, they shall
be considered in measuring in-place facility value.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The Board of County Commissioners determined during the 2007 Annual Update and Inventory
Report (AUIR) that recreational facilities are no longer a Level of Service to be counted in the AUIR.
The Recreational facilities value was replaced with Recreational facility type guidelines. Therefore the
Recreational facilities LOS no longer is applicable and need to be deleted from the element. It was
also directed that Community and Regional Park (LOSS) Level of Service acres per 1,000 be rounded
down. Revise to 1.2 acres of community park land/l,OOO population (unincorporated) 2.7 acres of
regional park land/I,OOO population
At the conclusion of the ROSE Objective and Policy analysis, a series of charts, graphs and maps
will illustrate the Level of Service analysis for Regional and Community parks.
Policy 1.1.5: Continue to correct or improve existing parks and recreation facilities
deficiencies which are necessary in order to meet the level of service standards.
Policv Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text for deletion.
2
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
The Board of County Commissioners determined during the 2007 Annual Update and Inventory
Report (AUIR) that recreational facilities are no longer a Level of Service to be counted in the AUIR.
The Recreational facilities value was replaced with Recreational facility type guidelines.
Policy 1.1.6: The County shall continue to establish and implement a program with appropriate
criteria to designate or acquire open space areas and natural reservations.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
Current policy is confusing recommend clarifying by the following: The County shall continue to
establish and implement a program with appropriate criteria to pursue and acquire open space areas
and natural reservations. A series of community planning initiatives, begun in the late 1980s,
culminated in 2001 with the Community Character and Design visioning process that brought to the
forefront of community dialogues the need for a greenspace acquisition program. Currently, 28 other
Florida Counties have similar, successful programs. The resulting initiative, "Vote Conservation 2002"
placed a referendum question on the November 2002 ballot, asking voters whether they would be
willing to tax themselves one quarter mill for 1 0 years to buy conservation lands and greenspace and to
approve a $75 million limited tax general obligation bond. Nearly sixty percent of Collier County
voters approved the measure. As a result, the Conservation Collier Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2002-63)
was developed, with citizen input and County Commission approval, to respond to identified
conservation needs and make conservation and protection of environmental resources into a real plan
for the future.
In November 2006 Voters were again asked in a referendum "straw vote" question whether they
understood and approved that the Conservation Collier Program would be funded by a quarter mill ad
valorum property tax for a period of ten (10) years, until 2013, expected to raise approximately $189
million as opposed to limiting it to a $75 million program. Eighty-two percent (82%) of the
respondents indicated that they understood the design of the Conservation Collier Program.
Since 2004 the program has acquired 3,901.45 acres. A list of the property acquisitions and a map
spatially depicting all property acquired through the program to date follows the ROSE section.
OBJECTIVE 1.2: Protect designated recreation sites and open space from incompatible land
uses through development of appropriate design criteria and land use regulations.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remain.
Objective is adequate to meet current protections for designated recreation sites and open space and the
issue of incompatible land uses has not been an issue with the existing inventory of park sites.
OBJECTIVE 1.3: Continue to ensure that all public developed recreational facilities, open
space and beaches and public water bodies are accessible to the general public.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text remain.
3
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Current objective embodies the need for public accessibility to facilities, open spaces and beaches.
This priority has remained high on the agenda of the County since the 2004 EAR.
Policy 1.3.1: County-owned or managed parks and recreation facilities shall have automobile,
bicycle and/or pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where such access is
economically feasible.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions. With HB697-2008 energy
conservation and efficiency requirements, the provision of energy efficient land use patterns, and
strategies reducing green house gas, specific consideration should be given to alternative forms of
transportation.
Recommend amending policy to reflect: County-owned or managed parks and recreation facilities
shall have automobile, bicycle and/or pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where
such access is economically feasible, with specific consideration given to alternative forms of
transportation that would reduce VMT and green house gas.
OBJECTIVE 1.4: Continue formal mechanism to improve and coordinate efforts among levels
of government and the private sector in order to provide recreational opportunities.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text remains.
The formal mechanisms in place (Interlocal agreement process with the School District, Interlocal
agreements with the state and municipal park providers and the land reservation through the public
hearing process) is meeting the needs ofthe County to satisfy the current level of service requirements.
Policy 1.4.1: Through the land development review process, Collier County shall continue to
encourage developers to provide recreation sites and/or facilities within residential and mixed
use Planned Unit Developments (PUDs).
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends revisions to the text.
Recommend policy to reflect the following change: Through the land development review process,
Collier County shall continue to encourage developers to provide recreation sites and/or facilities
within residential and mixed use Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), where appropriate. The
policy revision is a simple reflection that park sites are not appropriate and/or feasible in all PUD
request.
Policy 1.4.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate the provision of recreational facilities
and activities with other governmental jurisdictions that own or operate such facilities and
activities within, or adjacent to, Collier County. Said governmental entities shall include, but
not necessarily be limited to:
U.S. Department of Commerce, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior, The National Park Service
4
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry
Lee County, Florida
Hendry County, Florida
Broward County, Florida
Miami-Dade County, Florida
Monroe County, Florida
The South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin Board
The Collier County School Board
The City of Naples, Florida
The City of Marco Island, Florida
Everglades City, Florida
The City of Bonita Springs, Florida
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends revisions.
Deletion of everything in the policy after, "or adjacent to, Collier County." The County does not see
the value in listing the specific entity and would not preclude coordination with an entity that was not
listed or designated per the Policy.
Policy 1.5.1: Collier County shall maintain a current inventory of recreational facility
commitments made by developers through the development review process.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions to the text.
Current policy should be amended to include open space commitments as well as recreational facilities
to inventory.
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Add "and usable
open space" after "recreational facility" in existing policy.
OBJECTIVE 1.6: Whenever possible and practical, utilize County owned property for
recreational uses.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remain.
Current objective continues to be relevant and allows for land inventory to be dedicated to parks use
when deemed appropriate by the Board.
5
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
GOAL 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROMOTE A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SYSTEM TO MEET THE
RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS WITHIN THE COUNTY.
Goal Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends Goal be deleted.
OBJECTIVE 2.1: By the year 2010, the County Parks and Recreation Department will identify
general areas where neighborhoods might request sites for future neighborhood parks.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the Objective be deleted.
Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service
for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the
Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level.
Policy 2.1.1: The Parks and Recreation Department will identify those sites or general areas for
neighborhood parks with citizen input to detennine the types of recreational facilities
particular communities would like to see within their neighborhoods.
Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted.
Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service
for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the
Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level.
Policy 2.1.2: The County shall amend the Land Development Code to require the developer of a
residential PUD, or a PUD having a residential component, to provide its residents and guests
with a suitable neighborhood park, as detennined on a case-by-case basis, which is, as
required by Policy 5.4 in the Future Land Use Element, compatible with the surrounding
development
Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be modified and relocated to
current Objective Three.
Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service
for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the
Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level. Additionally, this policy needs to be revised to
delete the requirement of a "suitable neighborhood park" with the term recreational facilities and
clarify the reference to Policy 5.4 of the FLUE to state, "as required by Policy 5.4 in the Future Land
Use Element to be compatible with the surrounding development.
Policy 2.1.3 New neighborhood parks will be carefully sited and intentionally integrated into
existing residential neighborhoods, and shall be designed according to the principles of Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), where these principles are appropriate
and economically feasible. Neighborhood parks may also be co-located with churches,
schools, or other recreational facilities.
6
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted.
Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service
for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the
Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level.
Policy 2.1.4: The County shall investigate the utilization of tax credits or other incentives for
property owners who wish to dedicate land to the County to meet the recreational needs of
neighborhood parks.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted.
Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service
for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the
Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level.
Policy 2.1.5: The County shall encourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike
lanes from the surrounding residential communities to park sites.
Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted.
With the elimination of the Goal and Objective above related to neighborhood parks, this isolated
policy no longer has a larger connection to the ROSE. The policy of encouraging the development of
pedestrian pathways and bike lanes to park sites [rom surrounding residential development is still
sound and good policy to better promote individual mobility options and promotes a healthy lifestyle,
but the policy is already expressed in Policy 3.1.6 of the existing element
GOAL 3: THE COUNTY SHALL DEVELOP A COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM TO
PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS
WITlllN THE COMMUNITY.
Goal Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends Goal be revised.
The Goal needs to be renumbered to reflect the deletion of Goal 2 and expand upon the full integration
of mobility options to the County's park system as suggested below.
GOAL 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROMOTE A PARK SYSTEM THA T INCLUDES REGIONAL,
COMMUN/TY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WITH PEDESTRIAN PA THWA YS AND BIKE LANES
TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREA T10NAL NEEDS OF RES/DENTS
WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) CONTAINED IN THE CIE).
OBJECTIVE 3.1: By the year 2010, the Parks and Recreation Department will develop a
Community and Regional Park Plan to provide larger parks and recreational facilities as well
as passive open space within a 15 to 20 minute drive of residents within the coastal Urban
Designated Area, the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, and Northern Golden Gate Estates
(this excludes Conservation designated areas, Agricultural/Rural designated areas, Southern
7
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Golden Gate Estates, and the outlying Urban Designated Areas of Copeland, Port of the
Islands, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee). This plan will include the identification of future
community and regional park sites (or general areas), park improvements, cost estimates, and
potential funding sources. The principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) will be integrated into the planning and development of the Community and Regional
Park sites.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The County has been unable to complete the Parks Master Plan by 2010, but at the time of the
transmission of the EAR to the Department, the majority of the work on the Master Plan will be in
progress with the completion of the effort to occur in 2011. The policy will be revised to reflect the
adoption of the Parks Master Plan by the Board of County Commissioners.
Policy 3.1.1: The Parks and Recreation Department will acquire land to meet the needs of the
Community and Regional Park Plan, including sufficient land to allow for a portion of these
sites to remain in passive open space.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. The policy still reflects current
intent related to meeting the needs of Community and Regional Park Acquisition.
Policy 3.1.2: The Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for the design and construction of
all new community and regional parks.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. The Parks Recreation
Department shall continue to be responsible for the design and construction of all new community and
regional parks. Their professional knowledge concerning park design is essential in the development
of these projects. The construction of all new facilities will be designed to satisfy the current Level of
Service Standards contained in the ROSE and the CIE.
Policy 3.1.3: The County shall continue to partner with Collier County Public Schools to co-
locate parks in conjunction with new school sites as such sites are identified and developed
and/or to provide County recreational programs at Collier County Public Schools' facilities.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. lbis policy meets current need
and promotes the concept of co-location expressed within the Public Schools Facilities Element
(PSFE) of the GMP.
Policy 3.1.4: The County shall continue to update parks and recreation impact fees to keep
pace with increased land acquisition and development costs for the establishment of
community and regional parks.
8
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. In addition, recommend
removing the text increased from the policy due to current economic environment and providing for a
predetermination of market value.
Policy 3.1.5: The County shall investigate the utilization of tax credits or other incentives to
encourage property owners to dedicate land to the County to meet the recreational needs of
community and regional parks.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. Current policy meets the needs
of the acquisition of lands related to regional and community parks.
Policy 3.1.6: The County shall encourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike
lanes from the surrounding residential communities to park sites where general public access
can be supported.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. Current policy meets the needs
of the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes.
Policy 3.1.7: By the year 2010, the Parks and Recreation Department and the Transportation
Services Division will investigate the utilization of the existing canal and power line easements
to create a greenway system within the coastal Urban Designated Area, the Immokalee Urban
Designated Area, and Northern Golden Gate Estates (this excludes Conservation designated
areas, Agricultural/Rural designated areas, Southern Golden Gate Estates, and the outlying
Urban designated areas of Copeland, Port of the Islands, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee).
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text revisions.
The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. lbis effort has been initiated and
will be integrated as a component of the Parks Master Plan. The policy may be revised further based
upon the conclusion of the Master Plan effort.
9
Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE
Pages 10 and 11 Blank
Recreation and Open Space Element
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing
E
~ ~
o g
~ ~ z
u < U
o ~ '"
~a:: w ~ 0 < ~.fi: .
~ <~~~~X~ 0% ~:~ 5
~~~~~~e~~~A.~~ aa ~>~~-
&~~!:OD.-!~<n.f:<...J(/jw ~ t:::e- 0-' .:w:::
c>~z>>~>a>z~~ ~~~-~ >~~%w~mg ~
~~~~i~~~~~~to ::~g:~;L~~~g~~ -~
.....~l-2:J-::tZ:3z:;)::E_o _-t-z<4.<z>-%:I-IXCq;ct)
z:S502'W:i:::r2o~~.ccUl;;.oCL.w=:O;!;~~>- ~
~~~u~~~~~~u~~~O~_~~w%~U~ w~ c
~8~~g8~g!gi~~g~~~~~5~::~i~~~~
8>- u:~ ~ w:~_::5U0li.;c.;a: ~_ ~ ~~-w: ~ x ~ ~~:
~~.0C.~~0~mWW0W~~c~<o~-I0W~~%
zQ<oO~a<<0~~<~~~zo~wc~z~g~~~
:=~r:~~~g~~~~g~~~~g~~~:~:~~g~
~~>COO~~~~'>OO~O<UOOo<OOwO~Z~~
~~lx~~<<m~GZ2~02~OO~~Z<<Z~~-IWW~
~~;~gg8~~:e!!a!=~g~g~g~~~:~~~
~
;;:
a:
...
~
<C
~
os
fIJ
Ul fIJ 'E
IV
~ rIJ .... E
'" .... t:a IV
0- fIJ lU 0- ~Q)
" "t:f ~ 0- ~ Cl'"
0 '" IV ttI ~
C 0 0- ~ 0.. ffi~~
CD -E iij c 0
0 ::l ~
a ~ c E o.gC6
CD .c: 0 II> OIV~
Cl '0. E "C .c:_
..J 'jj) IV 0 c: OC:IV
Z a: u :::l cno....
o. . .
'Q~
;;
In
:::>
!
II:
<.>
:::;i
z
HE NtJR:.,i Y C()UNTY
- ~.
ijI"'""--'
~
i
i
Q_N~.~~~.~O_N~~~~~~~C_"M.n~~~
~~"MM~~"~~..........~~~~~~~~~
'"
'" '" a:
C::a::: :K: <
<< :.! It: Q..
D.Q. a: -".(:x::~ >
go :~ ~ ~.~ .~
~g~~:Q~g ~L . g ~
~~~~g8~~ ggiu ~. . (/}
m~oooioo ~9~ ~l:IC. U1 tL .~.:
ss8g~~g~~~c:ffi~ llC~ <~: ~
wwx~~:r:i~ G)mgW0G,. .~~ 5rr;~~<
zz~o%2o~ as:3:8~a: G..< (;~~~::t
:;r~!~~w ~~~<~~ ~w WJ ~~~ ~
~<o~~w~w %z~xr~c~~~c oxw~<<
~j~i0ct~~~i~~~~w~=~~~~~:~~~:
>~:N~~o~~~z~:=~~~~~3a<>:O~>o
~~e;i~~~~~~=s~e~~~:g~~~~~~:2
o<<~~~~-~o~woo<<<c::o<Oz~~<Smw0
~~w~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=g~
~!~~~u~~~~~Z~~OZ%~<~O>~~~KZ~
i~~~:8~~5~~::~88~~~i~:g~~~~~
_~~.~O~~~O_Nn.~~~.~Q_Nft~~~~~
_____~____NNNNNNNN~
12
Recreation & Open Space Element
2009 AUIR REGIONAL PARK SUMMARY FORM
Facility TVDe: Regional Park Land (Category A)
Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 2.9 acl1.000 countywide
Unit Cost: $230,000/ac
Using the peak season countywide population, the following is set forth:
Available Inventory as of 9/30/09
Required Inventory as of 9/30/14
Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14
5-year Surplus or (Deficit)
Acres
1121.68
1252.90
753.00
621.78
Value
$257,986,400
$288,167,000
$173,190,000
$143,009,400
Expenditures
Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14 acquisitions
Total Expenditures
$173.190.000
$173,190,000
Revenues
Proposed added value through commitments.
leases and interdepartmental transfers
Total Revenues
$173.190.000
$173,190,000
Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS
none
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends to the BCC approval of the Regional Park Land .Proposed AUIR FY
09/10-13114" projects for inclusion in the 2010 CIE.
Bee Motion:
The Bee motioned for approval ofthe 2009 Regional Parks AUIR component as presented.
The motion passed 5 to O.
*Note: Unit Cost $230.000/ac is based on 2009 Impact Fee Study.
13
Recreation & Open Space Element
c:
o
III;;
I!!-:;
:is-
"Co..
a:c:o
5~8
o(i!:....
glfl
~ _ u
III 0(
a"t
'6JN
CD ..
a:~
o
....
~.~ ~ 0 8 ! ! 0 ! 0 0 ~ 0 ~
~ ~ 0 ~ 0
... "':. "t
to i i i to to .... co .... ~ co
co 0 .... 0>> 0 N ....
~:ci! 0>> co co .... C'!. "t ~ ..... "l
ri to i C'i ,.: ... ... i .... C') C')
~~.. ID .... ~ C') C') C') I co
:;: N N N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ .. .. ..
~!CI 0 0 0 g g 8 ~ 0 g 8 0
g 0 0 8. 0
0 0 0 0 ct ct ct
I!.. to vi .; ot N ,.: ;Z C') 3 C') ....
ili co I ... 51 0>> co CD ~ ~
.... 0>> 0>> ... co ... C')
rO ..... N ,.: N to C'i ot g ... ,.:
co ~ .... ~ CD lD 0>> 0>> ... ...
~ N N N N N C') C') C')
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
>"
U N N N IN CD lD CD IS CD IS~
CI) 10 CI) CD N.... C') C')
" GO 0 ...: .o~ iii " ! GO"
!:!. !:! !!!. ~ :I~ m t; IOC')
GG
~~
,~ ~ lD :I 18 1818 lD CD lD CD lD
co ... CD ... co CD
... .0 .0 d .0... .0 .0 cD " ...
~:c N N N CIIt ....... .... .... .... ... ...
"'0 "":. "":. "'0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
iO'~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... N N
g~g: ... 0 g g g 0 g ...
g 0 i i 0 10 ~ ....
~~~ .... 0 0 .0 " 10 ...: ~ "
d .,f 0 .0 N GO 10 0 d d C') ... N
C') co CD 10 .... ... .... 01
II.
:SOl i 0 i ~ ~ i i 0 0 0 i
t=~ N 0 ... lD .... 0 0
::is ui ui cD cD ~ fii C') cD N ...: ~ d 0 C')
., G lD 0 ...: .... 0 N CD iii .0
Qag ....0 "":. "'0 C'!. C'!. C'!. 01 C'!. "l "l "l "l N N
... N
jf~d ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ....
~ 2. ~l ~ ~ ~ l;o~ ~~
~ CD .. ... ....
.. .... ... .. ~... ! !~ !c6
ClIlO ~~ ~~ ~
z ...~
ew
I.. 0 CQ N lD
~ IS C') 0>>
... co
C'i 1 ,.:
0 C') ....
I~ Ci" ~
... ... 0
0 ~ N
~ I
.b 0
...
... ... 0
0 0 N
!::!. ~ -
~~ ~ 0 ... N C') ... 10 CQ .... lD GO J:
I J: i
i ... ... ... .... ~ ;'b ... ... ... i
0 . N co\ . . .
CD ... CQ .... lD
g ~ .... ... ... ... ... ... .... ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)
II. N N N N N C) N N N N N C) ~
.. !
:I
~ 0
...
.. "C ~
III c:
... N
a::
o
on
on
Gl
a.
>-
u
Ol
i:ii
~ '0
1lI iii
Q. ~
~~ a.
~ .~ ~
-Gl U
::1!D:: U
O"C m
.~ i .9
~ a:.!!! ~
~ ~I ~~
~ i~'g, 5::-
e e8~ ~ a..e
l ~ ~~ '0 ~ ~
on o'-~.c~ ~Cl~
c: ()$o(uiii~~~~ui:iil'll
e! cn0_C-CO<<ltGCU a.
I- iD~C:1lI.Q.Q.a..Q.a..5g~
1I)"ii _,-Gla:.c~~~~:O:>:O:>Gl
~... c:l-s'-eGlGlGlGl::J::J':;;
~ Iii ~ :!! S'E 8. ~ '~'~'~'~:g :g iU'
.!!! E 8?. ~ c: E li}t: 1lI III 1lI 1lI c c m
Glt: EGloQ.llImmmmOOGl
.c ~ClE~() CDQ.~~.!!!~U U Q.
I- CD~ 0 1lI0Q.~Q.Q.Q.Q.Ci; Ci; E
'O~~<; li}:a.E Iii.E.E.E.~ g. g.cn
1::'" - '0 <:: (/) Cl (/) (/) (/) (/) - - Gl
~5111gCi;i:LCD1!GlCDCDGlg!g!Gl
"'UllI.c-{/)GlGlGlGlGlGlJllGlu.
ullIGluEuu.cU.U.U.u.oou
~~~~~Ill~-;:;~:n~~~ ~~
~.olllIllN~olllggf6g,...oq
ll)N~MU)U)ll)O) . . . .~ 0)
OlOlONNM-<t-<t.oiOt-:ciOciOciOOl
00,-..-.......-.......-..-...........,.....-..-..-
000000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
cOcnC>>~~N,hM.J>u)~~r!..cb
888000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
14
Recreation & Open Space Element
2009 AUIR SUMMARY FORM
Facility Tvpe: Community Park Land (Category A)
Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 1.2 ac/l,OOO in the unincorporated area
Unit Cost: $230,OOO/ac
Using the peak season unincorporated population, the following is set forth:
Available Inventory as of 9/30/09
Required Inventory as of 9/30/14
Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14
5-year Surplus or (Deficit)
Acres
544.54
457.10
(47.00)
40.44
Value
$125,244,200
$105,133,000
$ 10,810,000
$ 9,301,200
Expenditures
Proposed loss of value through interdepartmental transfer
Total Expenditures
$10.810,000*
$10,810,000
Revenues
Impact fees allocated to fee simple acquisitions
Total Revenues
~
$0
Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS
none
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends to the BCC approval of the Community Park. Land "Proposed AUIR
FY 09/10-13/14" projects for inclusion in the 2010 CIE..
BCC Motion:
The BCC motioned for approval of the 2009 Community Parks AUIR component as
presented. The motion passed 5 to O.
* Transfer of Community Park Land results in decrease in total value of inventory only.
Level of Service Standard is met after reduction.
*Note: Unit Cost $230,OOO/ac is based on 2009 Impact Fee Study.
16
Recreation & Open Space Element
c
o
:;::l
.
-'3
f Q.
:l.l.
!!;~g
::::).0
c(o..:!:
~~M
o c U
N::Jc(
EN
E...:
o
00
U)
o
....
Ww 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::::).... 0 0 0 ft 0 0 0 0 0 0
~3! N N N N N N N N N N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
4")
N N .. "a .. .. ..
c(~::: vi vi vi . ..a . . .. . . .
l)'C" N N N - - - - - - - -
:; - - - - - - - - - -
.. .. .. tit .. .. .. .. .. ..
m~1 0 0 0 g g g g 0 0 g 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C!. 0 0 0
0 0 0 ~ m M N vi m c
<<I- vi C C -
~ In - ..... 4") 3 10 0 ca N
00 - N CD f'!. - - CII CII 0 CII
..... 10 4") M vi ,.: m c M vi
~~a vi ,.: m -
: CII CII 0 0 0 0 0 - - -
.. .. - - - - - - - -
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ .. : ~ CD
....w ;I
II ~ c:i N CII - ..
....: a:i c:i N M .0 a:i
N - 10 .. .. 4") N - .0 -
- - -
-
il~
~j ~ ~ ;Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ....: ....: ....: ....: ....: ....: ....: ....:
=~ CII CII ~ ~ CII ~ ~ CII
.. .. .. ....
I:~ 0- - 0-
w_ 0
<cZ::J 0 0 0 0
~~: ~ ....: 0 ....:
~ c:i ~
0..-
filo
u:8 i 8 g ft 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
ca - ..... N CC! 0
~5~ c:i .,j N c:i a:i ....: ca .0 M N i en 10
a:i - ~ M
sg N N ~ 3 ~ 10 CD t; ~ CII
.., .., .., 4") .. .., CD
u:c:i
a.
to to ~ 0 .... 10 ... ... .... 0 to
~ ~ to ... 0 .... .., 0 to N
C!. II!. II!. Gt to .... II!. to 0
Q ~ .., 0 to .., 0 ,.: i ... 0; 0
W 10 to to .... to to 0 0 N
Z~ .., .., .., .., .., .., .., .., .... .... ....
~2 en - 0
CII N N
.., - CD
u: c m m
~8 4") C") ca
o..~
Z
::::)
- en ~
..,
- - 0
0 0 N
N ~ .
. 0
0 10 -
- - 0
0 0 N
!:!. N -
....a:: CII 0 N C") .., 10 CD ..... - .J:.
- i CD en i i
q - - - - - - - - - -
~~ . . . . I I . . . .
CD CII 0 - N C") .., 10 CD ..... CD 2
g g ... - - - 2 - - - - -
u:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... C)
N N N N N N C) N N N N N C) ..
.. I- ..
. . ~
CD CD
>, >, 0
10 10 -
- "a ~
. C
- N
~
QJ
a..
iU
c
o
'61
Q)
a::
"0
C
III
~
;:
Q)
b
I/)
~
o
()
01
in
1ii
"0
C
..!!!
..)j(
'-
QJ
Q.
iU
c
o
'61
~
'-
.E
Q)
01
C
QJ
.J:.
U
)(
Q)
.!;:
'-
J!!
CD
c
g
~
I:
Q)
E
1::
QJ
C.
G)
"E
G)
:5
Q)
~
::3
()
iU
"0
C
QJ
a::
o
III
R
::!..
N
....
o
N
I
....
....
o
N
17
Recreation & Open Space Element
s::
o
+:i
t'lS
::s
C-
O
CL
o
o
o
'I:""
-
fI)
CD
'-
(.)
<(
N
'I:""
(/)
(/)
o
..J
(I)
~
(J
<(
.:.:
'-
t'lS
CL
~
s::
::s
E
E
o
u
ex:
::::>>
<(
en
o
o
N
o
N
CO
5aJ:>Y
o
N
<D
o
,.....
"'"
o
N
"'"
OJ
"...
I
CO
.....
0
N
CO
.....
I
,.....
.....
0
N
,.....
.....
I
<D
"...
0
N
<D CIl
..... :is
I .!'!!
I.()
..... 'Q;
0 ~
N
II)
I.() e!
..... :t
I
"'" I
..... ~
0
N
"'" ~
..... 'S
I
C') C"
..... Q)
0 0:::
N II)
e!
C') :t
.....
I ..a
N Ie
.....
0 ;,g
N it'll
[3
: 0..,
N i 0 I
..- : +'
I
..-
..... I !
0
N I I
L..J
.....
.....
I
0
"...
0
N
0
.....
I
OJ
0
0
N
OJ
0
I
co
0
0
N
o
o
o
ci
I.()
C')
o
,.....
,.....
o
N
,.....
o
,.....
<0
o
,.....
I.()
o
N
I.()
I , ,
\
\
__V~^
,
~ I
\
,
\
J \
--..\.
/ \
<!) ~
2:-
;:l.S
()c
CIl
mE \
"Ot
C<<l
<<I a.... I
a::CIl~
o"E 0
tt1<!)c
: """-I!!
"'" .S: ....
o
o
o
ci
I.()
<D
o
o
o
ci
o
<D
o
o
o
ci
I.()
I.()
o
o
o
ci
o
I.()
UO!lelndod
o
o
o
o
I.()
"'"
o
o
o
o
o
"'"
18
Recreation & Open Space Element
DATE: ll/3I2010
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PARCEL STATUS REPORT
CYCLE 1
No. of T etal Acres Date Contract signed DallI Purchase
Owner N8/l1e1Buslness Name Parcels Closed Contract Amount Cost per Acre
Prot%1rfj~s
Acquired
Visn"h : '~G4 eXn, e,i nn,n" ,04 SViO.?Ge $-13C,E24
CCone i .'e Un',"??'(<, U? ('D', " LV',SGC $l61.2t:J9
PiE;' '2 'e.u', "i,G'Su4 n:"'U/iA EnS 2:/) C:C 8274.221
, nUl Unn::: Y) 'n S'CA S7S7 nnO 5253.974
G nn .. ') C". " P,..MU , 1 'iP '7ev d , "'U $9,386
G: n ' nU,n'i?t1 .. /, n Xi $9.386
Gf .. ! Sn .. Znn. 1 ><"i nn S"H] 989
;e;: (A! $ H) 290
e!c:, C, 'fUSf " 'C,' $;0.439
G :n:n':;..;,i" .J H " l' $9386
t:U . , b:,,:11,nn " " rCi , 'i'i :U $:3,434
GUE.. U " Hi,"'inn i. n niiP $11,013
UUE : . MiS:::Ji' , t :< ,C $9386
G j , C,<Vi , -C' d ..,. 810.503
.. ':-if,u i C' i.'i " ii" it $10 526
,fi , 'i'T i is C iC $10.692
( ... ., iafn i <1 e, ,... C 'fi $11AG4
(in U i2" . inU:iinrn 1 ::.in Ci'.'ee.. CA. 'f, P. $1353[1
Chit CC: e ifi"ii.U' ,vi'iQQC 1;.57 -~C5
. n") U
NY;n,". .., i.:X vi'vi':S CC. ,"1."U: C:(i.iinG 326 316
IN Hn;),! : ',i1 i" 'iiif ,ii"?!iiin iFvini 232.456
CV""ad :,,'!dh:c:, '."i .."< O:'iii.CJ S:".OC $32456
in , ,iH-;;;-U ii,,.:i( VC..'i'i'iCii
1. .i6Cv:::: SSO .687
nV <nnd ' Cn',,,,? i nSF ",i:i.t.F", F"FFOF $4C .C::. $25.157
Vi Hp9 d, lik:n:,; ;' 'F .<>111:' :}F'FS.'S)' ::.8S (Fv) $S 1 bG:J
CCE, U 6i; ~Si:; 'i < '6 U':.TiF SS iCe: $1 tG35
eeE..l i,F. e"'."L,:,:, 'Si Sf;;:'; i .. ii,::;: );i{ iei S 1 [U3S8
s< liC"'; B, "'-; Seeh,-.,}:) i 6F ii....;;,SiS ,F.')F.O/. 55 " i? iO? $32,500
Uk F cli<, ,i (..70 Un,i U<<, .'O?O<))) SS;.; 9;5; $H)5.G12
, 'j,;/!r:<,ScBS: DDO .. "':n $': 'H'i cn
VVl . . Lock""., ( iF) i 'ss ' ?nC}" HS?SO $39A 14
C; SciF iice ? i ;'i i. '.,';F'F " $36,027
C iii} .. US Si}:<'.. : i.. .iU ,if .} $3:3.860
UC. l 5C .. Sni,L '; A .. :'\:1 $38.6 'Ii
iiOY Ui <si : ''. ) .' $39604
C,S Li5.,. 'i .} iin :; S61A04
U::'.iiCibu: i:un :i ) / .'.;:, HC;e;' :i Sef )A.C,iA "',g,;"," 543.520
<eL L SC L';;.,ioi, I i' .S ieiii >iii 55 :'i 836.910
UTiL. :'.3 : ,i Si UC /i <.:: ;,:, $:>6Jj2A
CCF '. 53 1.. /i '. i '.1C $JEL 630
GeL LC . N'cEi<i , >:;"i Si ;/ ')i is $36, GOO
L:m,,:; '2 "2ii H>C./L'D:i ,';,'F'2S'::C 1'44:). CLD 14 7. 5i6
..... "..,i',.: <22 SFD 000
NU<t< e '!'3iD Hi " iU?i:OO i-i.;'ECE <./ SSFi'?C $268.14}
LiCE U 6; -,- .: . '.LTOO 'ASC iH W:SL $:55,000
C;S,C .. H:'i ...,...., P'i: ,,.;:c,. ';;.}i,.;,' : SSC.eDe $JB _ He!
Ch:Lnl' ;: i)C L'CC)'i"" LDi:,'r }'CDDD 821,930
Vi;iii' , SCC U eu ,,',.,; '/O'.S(7 liSSS n;ei: $1,303616
i )':7 e "i,i:, i. " S5, -?50
'('''hit' H " 0 r '" ..D? i. e
$C?'SD
, :,. ',.e. $07::::
..u ; i iC : ,.,.,... oe S"i $ Ii 1'1' 3S2
19
Recreation & Open Space Element
DATE 81312010
No. of
Owner NamelBusimm Name Parcels
I
:"';';" ,,;';,) --,.:,:;; "
, ",W' q
eelS, U CI
\',1 HeBd ' E%nnim T:
W iiedd, ; '!:;:;:
'{/'%;;:;I
Ii HeBel ' iF:!T: '; r
Vi Head Cbko
Vi Head - Haschker
\\1 Hf;'ad '" Medina, Antr::>nia
W H00tl ' S:.;nchez
1/\1 Hoad rGfFHqi
"'Head-
W He"d" ;,1m0fO
W Hcad " Fa?
"-A~ Muad: MinentiS
Vi Head TnrdnoiTot"o
""/'I H%-ad N R.€:rh~~;:J0Ci
V'; H'2&d ,< MOhabir
Vi H{1ad FraJ:ifH
Vi r10ad " Ben:;e: TL
''>/1 HBDd - Hunt
\:V Huad Lang-han
'/'11 Head Lewis
W Head" HIt;
"N Hnad Nat;,~ch
'IV Head Kennett
GGt: ~ US3 - De-\tjSSfJ Tr
f"c;0dom P,an
GGF U53 - BcrrnanTr.
Freitas
~iV Nef1{j - O'Rourke
GSE
,. US3 Stvn!!>','
"
Total Acres
'-:'
ii,', ';,
,
ir;::' T
:
,
-:
" "
, >,
" :
; r ;:
59
1 59
"
;
2.2""
"
.." ',",'1>'
~,d.,
1
i
I
i
1 '4
2.73
114
11...1
"
114
2n
114
,
';
'1
'H
1
1
~;
, c,,:
25
14
2 0.~
ck!"
1
1
" '-1
, ;4
72B
GGE ~ US] < CAe Pafc.el 1
GGE, U53 . EkrmE'P
GG E", US;)., Cf3isnak Tr+--H
Kav," Homes, in"- :;
Van C~OB\/e
TrilL
C0rn::dk~5i
Mabnev Tc
SUms
GGE ~. U53 B~^1&tdsk1V Tr-
GGE UST:. Bi.akc
OGE US3 C~"1sjank T r
GGE ~ U53 - FL>rcs
GGE - U5.3 JaCKSon
GGE U53 - ~kmHs
GGE U53 ,Kisf~inO':1~
GeE - U53 Less
SCiE -- UeT - NCf!
GGE " tJS3 ~. PosiHQ
GGF ,- US:::? SrH:ckW,r
GGE . US3 -- Shrvotk
GSE V52 A Tnhh}(;
Vi Hbcd ' J""",5
L.'dKU fraffcrd RanC!1 LLLP
CBmp KeH~$ uckcr
Camp V\eid$ BortnH:k
Camp Kt)ias - Darby
Camp K21as -- G:Hfm
Crmw heiilS -- 5ch0"!:,
GGE US3"
1.11
1.14
1-00
33.72
4
,
BO
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PARCEL STATUS REPORT
CYCLE 1
Date Contract signed
,
',j, "
--HI,ii :. '0; ':
E, " ", ",i",
, ~: ' i, r :<
;-/; "
',,-- ,'-
''''', ":
" , ,:;
Me::; 1VZ F
Bee: '2,1 ;?
pi'X 121' ,/
Bee 12/1 '07
H-ee 12ji1Hyr
B C:C 1 2!11.nrr
14-
Bce 12/11;
Bec 1211 1/
BCC 1),,1{
8(;( 11 H
bee
BCe 1 >1
BGG f;
GeC '1
see 1 !j
Bee 1 '1
Bee: 1 11
Bee
Bce
Bee
Date PurchaM
Closed
D'!"'O'CI
, ;'2"'::
"2' i7 ::<
, IT"
': "
," i,
"
',','
'e! 1
02:1
O:;U.t5h)S
fj3:D-3/0g
!\ ,;G:Wl
ij 10lOS
'])121 'Of!
':J,'2'H18
03/24iD8
'x, ;:,,;,0&
03.i2SiOe
Q4fOZf03
'>kOJrCB
G4;07ffH3
)s'VSI08
0[-,":':08
I [)S;nlcs
0S:'i\I'a;:;
'Of.;i30/0B
?
!
}!'2Ii'OS
00 <<FJ'"
, 0<'1-(;2
":'{"(,:08
12/;5/08
12'22!08
',2!22;;;S
~;',i;:i:;A)
',l9'
S
:;;
Ii
02/23./09
02iC9:GS
02ily}!(m
C:Y1-tYOS
U2123iQ9
,<F)'YJS
,!2IO)),29
11:"12",,9
~2r23(ns}
23'09/0S
)('Hi!OS
: <" YOS
04/13/09
"S/2T 63
:)810S OS
01;/17/09
Ie 3 ')0-")5
20
Recreation & Open Space Element
Contract Amount
'I,'';! -"",
'; A, ;;,
<, ''<-'v'
" :::.1:0 ',I,.
3tL57Q
$$6)S70
$43.,130
$43; 130
S26.220
$5 ~ ala
$26220
$2EL2Z0
$26,22.0
$&2< 7'90
$26)!2D
$26,210
$2$<22.0
$2€,2?G
$26.2:20
$2€220
$28.220
526220
$36,57'0
$2€220
5137D?)
$5;<1.300
518.060
543,130
$26,220
$18,060
$476<914
$18,060
518;050
S3T2:,]5D
SV'42,BOO
$7Sn,fJQa
$3A5J)[Hl
$735.500
S1Q3 G00
$1 BJ)6C
$43i24-9
$25,189
$68 438
$25,189
535,951
$15,189
SHtOSD
$70.972
$79,21v
$35,9S1
S1RG50
$55 ;:89
$25,036
S;I?5Z5,O,/'
$?5JlDO
542500
$12500
$12,SOC
56,250
$71 923
Cost per Acre
$5 750
$id0::';;;; l
$.14.501
$6 7"50
S22 COO
S 23 GOO
$23.000
"
$,23.000
~L55
1n
97
2
114
;;(7:3
'iA
gce
Bce:,;
BCC Ai
Bce ~', ;~ mE
fE,t: 5';, ?i;;j
ij\2C S/:T.,('B
se:_
pr.f'
U"C
U'"
J'-'
H'\
;'0
sce ~,l\2SmS
";c<;
Bee,
e:::c
Ie
:,;
,'"
<:
,,^, 1
Be '111;}:',,1;
8CCi2/1!3m8
Bee 12: 16mB
Be<::: /45:06
Bee !VUCS
Bce /vvos
8ce 11fj}()B
$23.0no
$23.000
Si9.DfJQ
S19.000
S23,QDG
$19.,000
$23,OCO
$23,000
$2300C
523 GO,
$23.000
$23.000
$23,000
823 GCO
$23 oem
$2:; OOG
$23.0eo
$23 000
$23,000
523.0CO
$1::,342
54 604
$15 542
$1C(QOD
$23 OGO
;;;<1t:: 842
$15B42
",.,... 8.42
$1.5 847
$63.003
$76.0C2
$9 500
$75.877
$7?GSO
$7247-1
S~f,.842
$15.842
S15..8-42
$15,642
$15,842
",15.642
$15,842
S 15B4;~
$15.842
S -5842
,.; 5.842
$ 5.542
$: 5.8d2
$ l=; 375
$1294b
52 500
32500
$2 500
$2 500
$,2 :::'-",;U
), ~>.6<';-L
"
~ 59
}.
,1 "2
, 5?
227
,
,
.$9
I
I
;
'\ '4
4,43
;(,;;7
,;4
:' ,is
i,59
.1n
2.511%
10
5
2.5
-1.54
DATE: 81312010
CONSERVATION COLLIER
PARCEL STATUS REPORT
CYCLE 1
No. ot Total Acres Dale Contract signed Dale Purchase Contract Amount Cost per Acre
Owner Name/Business Name Parcels Closed
GGE US} " Gon:tzfez 1 2,6 Bee "12/1 Edna 04/ -1 :VOB 539.60S S15,E>42
CSE tJ53 Mir 1 2,5 Bee 12J16H)$ D4/2/fihl $3960:; S15,S4::~
GGE - U53 P{~}acios 1 4.83 EKe 12)1 tHiS 04/12V09 S'1K101 515,842
W Head 8BnnanfCe~sn0k ., 1.14 BCG ^i2iiSroS 0SiG7'0S $18.653 $16,375
GGE U5-3 Bcnnsn 1 1.14 Dee 1/13i()9 Q/ $lS.060 515&42
SSE . U5-3 C-i}n3L:~s 1 5 BCC 1!13mS D5/1r!OS $79.210 i $1.5.e42
GGF ,. US3 . Him' 1 227 DCe 1!13/09 CJ3r:n:VCs $35.96 j $15842
W Head . BaP ns-id '1 'L5B BCe y, US/11!G!! $26,03& $H33/5
W Head Perrone 1 'L14 BCe 3i' == 04/27/0!! $i8JiiH! $-~6,375
W HeiHi Ze,l; - 5 BCe 3i' U4/13HJ9 $81.876 $"\6.375
C-drnj K(~iBS CHnda!Wa!sh . ~; .r~',..;.',-<- :L: 04-113:'09 $12.5rm $2. SDG
!
GGE ~- US-) -~ r"hluqhtOfl 1 2.73 see 2iJ(FG9 D5/jj'G9 $43-,249 $1fiJ3~2
GGF U53 Robtns~)n 1 2_.2.7 see 2i1Gf09 05';1/08 83:L961 $15.342
GGE U53 RG-rnaK i 114 see 2'1\;;00 'ftk 18sw:'" SiS.OCO $ i 5.842
GGE ^ U53 Rev 2' 5.6& bee 2/24!09 06!'i1/0S S89,6f16 $15842
GSE U-53 TaubBt i is Bee 2i2:4ifH3 05/11/09 $79,210 S15.842
IN NHad " Ponce- 1 1 ,,,,- BGe 2:24/09 0:5/1 1,'09 S1B.fiGB $16375
,fi. Head . Pa(;h~c/" j :L27' see 2:24:09 05:11/09 $37,171 316.3/5
>if'll
v; Head 1 i .69 see :,,2409 HUl/09 526.038 516375
Vi Head. MUF,te 1 1 14 see >;;jJhhi D2JOB/OS $18/563 $iG:'.!$
Trio.nokt Liccns~nq Cerp 1 29.33 eee ef2V09 OSI1O/OS S28BAOn S9. H67
VV Head -. Fit,':Qrek i 1.14 I see 12'15iG9 01<i5/10 $1BJ36-B SH3.375
IN Heud .Stmk 1 114 se/, 1:2(/10 U3/08/10: $11400 $';0:000
Rivers ROod "Devb:SB r 1 4.64 Bee: 2/23iHl G3'29i1G 81GS,OGO
Nancv Pa\lian Preserve " Kirbv 1 1 SFr :n3!10 05l1mO $30.000
Nancv P<:wian PresorY!) . Murph',' 1 1 sce 4i2fifjtl I $32.500
W Head Lanqkii 1 1.14 $11400
I
Tnta! PurChasec!iUnd€'f Contract I 192 4;vQ(L02 $1C},522A53
I
t=t
C:h . Hr;(>'C// 4 <: ;;C"".; . i 'I: :CC" C'::C .\..../}) ,2 '.e cee
._",_.,u_..,
21
Recreation & Open Space Element
Location of Conservation Collier Program Lands - 2010
~~~_~_~_ Ran~-Prese~!J
..~
\
.., .>~.---r
learae.fa PTaiiie-ji~~~-"- ;m
L-._.. ".w ~....:
/I~.~~~~n'M8nh"Pf_m-
i'
/
./
~wet--'NOOd$ Presorve i:':::?
!AlII\iOiOi'jiiogprmrvej
~---., ".....
\. l'
\ i
\ J
\ j
\
,
1!:~I\I~ples....!"~ pre.e~
\ i
\, i
\1
~
,...,..
......
~,,,,,,,,...-:.}Wincheoter H.~
-.--.....-----
~1l~I."'ead Scrub pr......el",,,";\~~
'..""'''''.ioi
\'f" ".".~
.\ ';, .. ;;@:
f;;\4
"''"'!
'4\1...------.-.""".,..-
~
.
,
,~.;-
. ^~~.==~r~,~_!_~.-.~.~~j"p;;$erYel
~~~-~.,~~~~~ifPiOj;tCt]
I
I
ICOO<lhetchee C,!ek Preserve...'
~ r.,
~-, ..
~~::~~~:~rese~~~
!".reedom ~~~r"=="=~~..-J
r"
;.r, '\.,
.-jHa'!.~_~~~_~~.~~
i'
t'] I
tl'
~:-
I
Eo
Acquisition Status
,. Conservation Collier Acq,
Other Agency Conservation L ~fj~erMoUndPres;;;;;;;]
.. Lake Trafford
.. Mitigation I Conservation Easement
,L;;k"j;:V.neM8nih-'piOjeclj
.///
//
f~
'&J ..
5
10 Miles
www.CollierGov. netlConservationCol1 ier
[)
Data Source:Parcels - CoHier County Property Appraiser
Created By: Facilities Managemenll Conservation Collierl A. Sulecki
G:\Conservation Collier\maps\Acquired properties\
Acquired&Approved_Map_August201 O,mxd and .jpg
January 26.2010.
Cotlier County
22
Recreation & Open Space Element
j;
G
..
o
l.k
'~
~
-,1i
-.J
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Conservation and Coastal Management Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper
formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below.
Goal: General statement that defines what the Element will
ultimately achieve.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal;
describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s).
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to
achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s).
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department
name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective
and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical
changes.
Objective 1.1:
Revise to reflect Program implementation and activities are ongoing
Policy 1.1.6:
Revise to include the amendment's effective date
Policy 1.2.3:
Revise for clarity
Policy 1.2.5:
Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant
Policy 1.3.1:
Delete references to acronyms and replace with a general reference
Policy 1.3.4:
Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant
Objective 2.1:
Modify to reflect completed work and reword fIrst sentence in item (c)
Policy 2.1.6:
Delete, as Policy is not relevant
1
CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 2.1.7:
Policy 2.2.5:
Policy 2.3.6:
Objective 2.5:
Policy 2.5.1:
Policy 2.5.2:
Policy 2.5.3:
Objective 3.1:
Policy 3.1.1:
Objective 3.4:
Policy 3.4.1:
Policy 3.4.4:
Policy 4.1.2:
Policy 6.1.1:
Modify to reflect completed work and listed activities are on-going
Revise to extend deadline to December 2015; and, include a requirement to
coordinate activities with the SFWMD and FDEP
Revise to remove the requirements for TSS, BOD, Pb, Zn, and Cu from the
Policy in Section "b." and delete Section "c."
Revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance
Revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance
Revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance
Revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance
Revise to reflect establishment of the monitoring network and provide a
reference that groundwater monitoring activities are ongoing
Revise to clarify that the conditional use reference pertains to those
conditional uses required by this policy, as opposed to all conditional uses
allowed by the zoning district on a given property within a wellfield
protection area; remove or clarify the term "extraordinary circumstances";
and, add a provision to coordinate with the SFWMD and Big Cypress
Basin Board to evaluate the location and number of monitoring wells
needed, and the potential funding opportunities, for improving ground
water monitoring to assess saltwater intrusion.
Revise to reflect correct reference to Objective 3 of the NGW AR
Revise to add reference to salinity trending
Revise to include reference to coordination with the SFWMD and Big
Cypress Basin
Revise to include a date for Policy achievement; and, provide within the
Policy that the County, in coordination with the SFWMD shall be
responsible for devising a method to determine agricultural pumpage
Modify to correct scrivener's errors in subsections 6.1.1 (7 & 13); delete
subsection 6.1.1 (7); add an exemption from the native vegetation retention
requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose
purpose is to manage land for conservation; and, evaluate for possible
elimination of native vegetation retention requirements for Industrial
designated properties under a certain acreage threshold
2
CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 6.1.2:
Policy 6.2.1:
Policy 6.2.5:
Policy 7.1.2:
Policy 7.1.6:
Objective 7.2:
Objective 7.3:
Policy 7.3.1
Policy 7.4.1
Policy 9.1.6
Policy 9.1.7
Policy 9.2.3
Revise to include reference to the June 2010 Land Development Code
amendments that implement specific subsections of the Policy; include an
exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and
State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for
conservation purposes; and, evaluate for possible elimination of native
vegetation retention requirements for Industrial designated properties under
a certain acreage threshold
Revise to include the correct Florida Administrative Code reference; and,
delete the existing, and insert the current, SFWMD land use and land cover
inventory reference
Delete Section 6.2.5 (6)(5)(b)(3), as the specific criteria to identify
mitigation priorities and implement the incentive program have been
adopted into the Land development Cod~; and, address native vegetation
retention standards for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System as part
of the Immokalee Area Master Plan amendments and provide applicable
cross references to other Elements
Delete references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the
Policy; revise to add a general reference to publications utilized by the
FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance; and, delete the reference
to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such mitigation is required by the
FFWCC or USFWS
Revise to reflect the continuance of Policy objective
Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on manatee deaths
in Collier County waters
Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on sea turtle
disorientation
Revise to reflect the correct Policy reference
Modify Policy to refer to other funding opportunities
Revise to reflect the establishment of a training program
Revise to reflect current departmental reference
Modify to reflect the establishment, and maintenance, of a cooperative
agreement; and, delete the phrase, "establish a new~~ and replace with the
phrase, "and maintain a."
3
CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 9.4.3
Policy 10.1.1:
Policy 10.1.5
Policy 10.2.1
Objective 10.3:
Policy 12.1.1:
Policy 12.1.3:
Policy 12.1.5:
Policy 12.1.7:
Policy 12.1.9
Policy 12.1.11
Policy 12.1.12
Policy 12.1.13
Policy 12.1.14
Policy 12.1.15
Policy 12.1.17
Policy 12.1.21
Policy 12.2.5
Policy 12.3.2
Objective 12.4
Modify to remove redundant sentence
Revise Policy or add policies that provide strategies to preserve recreational
and commercial working waterfronts
Modify to consistently refer to "marine" wetlands
Modify to require beach access sites shown on plans to be at the discretion
of the County
Revise to include a reference to the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources
System maps
Revise to remove the phrase, "printed in" and replace with the phrase,
"provided to."
Modify to reflect shelter space figures that are consistent with the Southwest
Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study Update
Modify to reflect updated equipment listing requirements for onsite shelters
Revise to add requirement to coordinate with the municipalities
Revise to reflect correct terminology and coordination of activities
Revise to reflect latest document date
Revise to reflect latest document date
Modify to reference funding limitations
Delete, as the inclusion of hurricane shelters within the 5-year schedule of
Capital Improvements is not supported by the BCC
Modify to make Policy references consistent with State and Federal
guidelines; and, revise to reflect latest document date
Revise sentence for clarity
Revise to reflect the next due date for the Plan update
Modify to delete existing, and include new, CHHA definition
Revise for clarification and sentence structure
Revise to reflect current terminology and departmental names
4
CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes and Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Consenration and Coastal Management Element
A. Background and Introduction
The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan provides the
County the guidance to: manage coastal systems and historic resources, and maintain shoreline lands
and infrastructure so as to enhance environmental, recreational, and economic opportunities and
protect human life; protect, conserve and manage natural systems, and vegetative and land resources;
and, where appropriate, enhance air and water quality.
The Conservation and Coastal Management Element includes thirteen (13) Goals and associated
objectives and policies. These Goals are summarized as follows:
I. Protection of natural resources;
2. Protection of surface and estuarine water resources;
3. Protection of groundwater resources;
4. Protection of freshwater resources;
5. Protection of mineral and soil resources;
6. Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat;
7. Protection of fisheries and wildlife;
8. Maintenance of existing air quality;
9. Management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes;
10. Protection of coastal resources;
11. Protection of historic resources;
12. Hurricane evacuation and sheltering; and,
13. Avoiding duplication of regulations
During the reporting period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report, the County has been successful
in furthering the Element's overall purposes of: protecting and conserving natural resources; protecting
human life and property along the coast; and, protecting and managing watersheds and estuarine areas.
The County has implemented and maintained various programs and regulatory controls that have been
instrumental in protecting and conserving wetlands, listed species habitat and other areas appropriate
for protection; these include, but are not limited to: (1) The Stewardship Program in the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay; (2) The Transfer of Development Rights Program in the Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District; (3) The Conservation Collier land acquisition program; and (4) Regulatory
controls within the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Land Development Code.
Additionally, the County continues to maintain timely hurricane evacuation and sheltering practices;
constructed the new James V. Mudd Emergency Services Center with state of the art equipment;
maintains water quality and monitoring programs; continues the development of watershed
management plans; continues periodic beach renourishment and dredging projects; and, continues to
monitor sea turtle nesting.
1
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Preparation of this Section of the Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR) involved coordination
between Comprehensive Planning staff and the following departments/sections: Land Development
Services Department - Zoning Services Section, Stormwater and Environmental Planning Section,
Engineering Services Section; Public Utilities Engineering and Water Departments; Pollution Control
Department; Parks and Recreation Department; Coastal Zone Management Department; Facilities
Department - Conservation Collier; and the Bureau of Emergency Services. Changes are proposed to
the following Objectives and Policies.
B. Objective Analysis
OBJECTIVE 1.1:
Collier County will continue to develop and implement a comprehensive environmental
management and conservation program, which will ensure that the natural resources,
including State and Federally listed animal species, of Collier County are properly,
appropriately, and effectively identified, managed, and protected.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Collier County continues to operate the program described in this Objective.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect that the program is ongoing.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 1.1.3:
Collier County shall continue to support established environmental policies by maintaining an
appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of
developing, administering, and providing long-term direction for the protection and
management of the County's environmental resources.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The County continues to support established environmental policies by maintaining an appropriately
administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of developing, administering, and
providing long-term direction for the protection and management of the County's environmental
resources.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that the financial feasibility of achieving the Policy objectives with limited staff resources be
evaluated]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and AdoTJtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to this Policy
is recommended Staff believes that current staffing levels are adequate to fulfill the Policy objectives,
and adjustments have been made over time in response to changes in workload]
{Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 AdODtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.]
2
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy 1.1.6:
In those areas of Collier County where oil extraction and related processing is an allowable
use, such use is subject to applicable state and federal oil and gas permits and Collier County
non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling and/or
previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native
habitats, where detennined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon
issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25
through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules exist on the effective date of this amendment to the
Collier County Comprehensive Plan, regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big
Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001 (2), F .A.C. All applicable Collier County
environmental pennitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the
issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas
activities in Collier County, so long as the state pennits comply with the requirements of
Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary
of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big
Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance
with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F .A.C. even if outside the defined Big Cypress
Watershed. All access roads to oil and gas uses shall be constructed and protected from
unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C-30.005(2)(a)(1) through
(12), F.A.C.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 1.1.6 outlines the environmental review criteria for oil extraction and related processing, where
oil extraction and related processing is an allowable use in the County.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include
the effective date of the amendment.
OBJECTIVE 1.2:
Maintain the framework for an integrated, computer-based environmental resources data
storage, analysis, and graphics system and annually update the databases based on previous
year's analytical data in order to monitor the status of the County's natural resources and
propose potential protection measures when appropriate.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The Collier County Environmental Planning Section maintains a robust, GIS-based system (ESRI's
ArcGIS) that will be updated annually.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
(Environmental Advisory Council rEAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that the Objective address/include provisions for quality of data, analysis of data, and availability of
data; and, the Environmental Planning Section maintain copies of, and an index to, analyses
performed on these GIS-based data.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment- No change to this Policy
is recommended. The computer-based environmental resources data is stored with the Division's GIS
data. This makes the data most available to other county staff. Data quality details are stored as
metadata files when they are provided by the data source. Published GIS data are required to include
metadata jiles. Almost all county data are public records and available, there is no need for the
3
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
environmental planning section to maintain copies. A log of environmental analysis will be started
and stored with the environmental GIS data.}
{Board of County Commissioners (BCO Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 Adootion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.]
Policy Relevance
Policy 1.2.3:
Collected and/or compiled data will be organized by established water-shed and sub-basin
units.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Most of this data is in GIS format, so there is no need or benefit to organize it by watershed.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to
require watershed dependent data only be organized by watershed and sub-basin units.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that text be added to the Policy that ensures data quality.]
{Planninf! Commission Comment from the AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
Policy be revised to read, "Non GIS-based data collected will be organized by established watershed
and sub-basin units. "]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
CCPC recommendation that the Policy be revised for clarity. However, staff does not concur with the
EAC's recommendation, as "data quality" is addressed in preceding Policies.]
{Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 20ll AdoTJtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.]
Policy 1.2.5
Collier County's computerized environmental resources data storage, analysis and graphics
system shall share information and resources with other Federal, State, Regional, local and
private environmental management agencies and organizations and the general public. The
County shall cooperate with these other entities when updating its system in order that the
benefits of the updated system may be shared with all appropriate agencies and organizations.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Provisions for working cooperatively with other agencies and sharing data with the public are in the
preceding policies.
This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted.
OBJECTIVE 1.3:
Pursuant to Administration Commission Final Order AC-99-o02 dated June 22, 1999, the
County has completed the phased delineation, data gathering, management guidelines and
implementation of the Natural Resources Protection Area (NRPA) program as part of the
required Collier County Rural and Agricultural Assessment. Through this Assessment, the
County has detennined that the NRPA program is not the only mechanism to protect
4
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
significant environmental systems. Accordingly, within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area
Overlay in the Future Land Use Element, the County has delineated Stewardship Sending
Areas that will function to protect large environmental systems. Pursuant to the following
policies, the County shall protect identified environmental systems through the NRPA and
Rural Lands Stewardship programs.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be rewritten
for clarity (i.e. formatting).
Policy Relevance:
Policy 1.3.1:
The purpose of the NRPA program is to direct incompatible land uses away from significant
environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected
wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The program will
include the following:
a. Identification of the NRPAs in map form as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map;
During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area, the County has detennined that CREW
Trust lands, Belle Meade, a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be identified as
NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate Estates is a NPRA.
The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the Future Land Use Map.
b. A process for verifying the existence and boundaries of NRPAs during development
pennit applications;
c. Guidelines and standards for development of NRPAs including conservation guidelines
to protect natural resource values, to maintain ecologically functioning systems, and to
restore or mitigate NRPAs already degraded. Allowable land uses,
vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species
protection criteria for the NRPAs are those contained in the NRPA Overlay within the
Future Land Use Element.
d. A review process, integrated into the normal development application review, to ensure
that the guidelines and standards are being met;
e. A program to defer development of NRPAs. First consideration should be fee simple
purchase (based on public referenda approving and funding purchases). Other options
should include, but not be limited to, tax incentives and transfer of development rights;
f. A program to pursue Delegation of Authority Agreements with State and Federal
Permitting agencies for local regulation of activities that may alter the biological and
physical characteristics of NRPAs;
g. The County shall seek assistance from and support State (e.g. CARL, SOR) or Federal
land acquisition programs for County areas qualifying as NRPAs.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The County established Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRP As) to direct incompatible land uses
away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of
connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The Policy also
provides information regarding the relationship of the NRP As to the Rural and Agricultural Area
Assessment. Finally, the Policy requires the County to seek assistive from, and support, state and/or
federal land acquisition programs for areas qualifying as NRP As; Conservation Collier identifies
nominated properties within Federal and State acquisition areas and coordinates with the agencies to
make them aware of willing sellers within their acquisition areas.
5
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!USt 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
to delete the acronym "CARL" and insert "Florida Forever"; and spell-out the acronym, "SOR" -
Save Our Rivers.)
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff generally agrees
with the EAC's recommendation, and suggests that the Policy be revised to read, "The County shall
seek assistance from, and support, State and/or Federal land acquisition programs for County areas
qualifying as NRP As. "]
(Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 20Il Adootion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings stqff comments.)
Policy 1.3.4:
Guided by the Technical Advisory Committee, designate and adopt management guidelines
and perfonnance standards for County natural resource protection areas. Implementation
shall occur on an annual basis as NRPAs and their implementation criteria are developed.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Policy objectives have been achieved as part of the Growth Management Plan amendments to
satisfy the Final Order.
This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted.
OBJECTIVE 2.1:
By January 2008, the County shall complete the prioritization and begin the process of
preparing Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect
the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The process shall consist of (i) an evaluation of
areas for which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on current or past
watershed management planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available data and information
that can be used in the development of Watershed Management Plans, and (3) budget
authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed Management Plan by January 2008.
A funding schedule shall be established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will
be completed by 2010. In selecting the order of Plan completion, the County shall give
priority to watersheds where the development growth potential is greatest and will impact the
greatest amount of wetland and listed species habitats. The schedule and priorities shall also
be coordinated with the Federal and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily
Loads (TMDLs). Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply
the following as interim standards for development:
a. All new development and re~evelopment projects shall meet 150% of the water quality
volumetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental
Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District
(February 2006) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable offsite
discharge rates required by Drainage Sub-element Policy 6.2 and 6.3, respectively;
b. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall
be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity
on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland.
c. Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the
designated flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate
Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date
6
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
of November 17, 2005. Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for
areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheetflow conditions.
d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to
determine impacts to natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs. For this particular
evaluation, natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified as
contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet facultative plant
species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the natural wetland,
flowway, or slough at least one (1) foot lower than the ground at the edge of the natural
wetland, flowway, or slough. The edge of the natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs
shall be identified by field detennination and based upon vegetation and elevation
differences from the adjacent uplands or transitional wetlands. The County shall
require the applicant to avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or
sloughs or, when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and
compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact
The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in
Ordinance 2001-27, adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water
Management Policy and provided basin delineations where special peak discharge
rates have been established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of
the Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings
of the Watershed Management Plans.
e. All new development and re-development projects shall ensure surrounding properties
will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on stormwater sheet flow.
f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all
development projects to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental permits.
g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land
development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future development
or re-development projects. Best Management Practices means structural and non-
structural facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution either through source
control or treatment of stormwater.
Figure 1.
Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.1.d is
Applicable [See Figure 1 following CCME text]
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Collier County is currently involved in the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The
County completed the initial delineation and prioritization of the watersheds by the end of November
2007. Dedicated funding for development of the Watershed Management Plans was also obtained and
set aside in 2007. The County coordinated with the Florida Department of Emergency Management
coastal Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) aerial topographic mapping effort to obtain more
detailed and expanded coverage of the County. The County also coordinated with the South Florida
Water Management District to utilize their existing two-dimensional regional hydrologic and hydraulic
model for southwest Florida as a starting tool in the development of the Watershed Management Plans.
The County utilized the various policies under CCME Objective 2.1 to form the basis for the Scope of
Services and then hired a consultant team to prepare the Watershed Management Plans. The work is in
progress and is scheduled for completion by the end of 2010.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be modified to
reflect completed work, and the first sentence in (c) reworded as follows, "Floodplain storage
compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated Special Flood Hazard Area
(flood zones starting with the letter "V" or "A") as depicted on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map
published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency."
7
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
{Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf! held on 3/15/10):
Public stated that the County has not developed a county-wide stormwater plan.]
{Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf! held on 3/15/10):
Public stated that all development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated
after each watershed and its characteristics are developed.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
to add in section b. of the Objective, a requirement that compensation for all wetland impacts occur
within the same drainage area.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments. as wetland impacts will be
addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland
impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.]
(Board of Countv Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
Policy Relevance
Policy 2.1.3:
The Plans will also evaluate structural and non-structural controls for restoring historical
hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where pOSSible and for reducing the impacts of canal
and stonnwater discharges to estuaries.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Scope of Services for development of the Watershed Management Plans includes this policy's
features.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
that measurement tools be added to the Policy so as to determine improvements to the watersheds over
time.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EA C) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adovtion Hearing-
Suggesting that the EAC comment from August 11, 2010 be revised to read, "measurement tools be
added to the Policy for determining improvements to the watersheds over time. ''j
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy
is recommended at this time. The Watershed Management Plans include performance measures, and
the needfor future evaluation of improvements will be addressed when Plans are adopted]
{Board of Countv Commissioners (BCe) Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 AdODtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.]
Policy 2.1.6:
Until the completion and adoption of individual watershed management plans, promote water
management pennitting on a basin by basin approach.
8
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Water management permitting is regulated by the South Florida Water Management District.
The Policy is not relevant and should be deleted, as water management permitting is regulated by the
SFWMD.
[Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 WorkshoTJ - Suggesting
that data shortfalls be addressed]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 AdoTJtion Hearing-
Suggesting that EAC comment from August 11, 2010 be revised to read, "use watershed management
plans for ongoing data collection guidance. "]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and AdoTJtion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy
is recommended at this time, as the Watershed Management Plans will identifY data needs.]
{Board of County Commissioners (BCO Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adovtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
Policy 2.1.7:
Collier County shall take the lead and promote intergovernmental coordination between the
County and other governmental agencies involved with watershed planning, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the municipalities of Marco Island, Naples and Everglades City, the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the South Florida Water Management District,
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other governmental agencies. The County will take the lead
and oversee the preparation of the necessary watershed management plans, and will rely upon
the work perfonned or data collected by other agencies, to the extent that these agencies have
data and/or experience, which may be useful within the watershed basin planning and
management process.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy describes the Scope of Services for the development of the Watershed Management Plans.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to reflect
work completed and that the listed activities are on-going.
OBJECTIVE 2.2:
All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable Federal,
State, or local water quality standards.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective has not been met, because there are several water bodies in Collier County that do not
meet Federal or State water quality standards. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency have finalized the list of those water
bodies that do not meet water quality standards, and in 2008 FDEP developed Total Maximum Daily
Loads for these water bodies. The Watershed Management Plans being developed by Collier County
will address these water bodies.
Water quality improvement initiatives have been taken within Collier County to address some water
quality issues. A new water quality treatment system referred to as Freedom Park has been constructed
to treat the water within the Gordon River. In addition the Lake Trafford dredging project, which is
9
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
currently ongoing, has been removing the muck on the bottom of the lake in order to improve the
lake's water quality and prevent future fish kills.
Collier County Pollution Control continues to implement numerous proactive programs designed to
protect the County's surface water quality from man-made pollution sources. However, due to natural
conditions impacting the water quality found in Collier County, some federal and state water quality
conditions may not be achievable. Therefore, Collier County will continue to take all necessary
actions to maintain the highest attainable level of surface water quality within its watersheds.
lbis Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be reworded
similar to Goal 3 to read, "to attain the highest water quality practical."
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
staff examine the use of filter ponds to improve water quality of canals.)
[Planning Commission Comment from the AUf!Ust 27.2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the
Objective be retained as written.]
{Recommendation from the October 14. 2010 South Florida Water Manaf!ement District Comments to
the Devartment of Communi tv Affairs on the Provosed EAR - Suggesting that the Objective be
retained as written.]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
stated recommendations that the Objective should be retained as written.]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 2.2.1:
Wastewater treatment plants shall not be allowed to discharge directly to rivers, canals or
jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives and Policies of this
Element
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.2.1 bans wastewater treatment plants from discharging directly into rivers, canals or
jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives, and Policies of this Element.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
to insert the phrase, "encourage wastewater re-use for irrigation" within the Policy.]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff recommends
retaining the Policy as written, as the reference to are-use" is not applicable to this Policy. Further,
staff suggests an additional Policy be added within the CCME to address the EAC's recommendation,
if Board directed]
(Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 Adovtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
10
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.2.2:
In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run-off, stormwater
systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving
waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity and quality of fresh water to the
estuarine system. Non-structural methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are
encouraged.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.2.2 limits the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run-off.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to delete
the word "in" and with the word "into" in the last sentence.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
staff limit nitrogen and phosphorous use through a fertilizer ordinance, so these nutrients become less
likely to reach waterways (seasonal uses, granular forms, no application near storm drains or water
retention/flow areas). Also, limit application of pesticides in a similar fashion.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - The adoption of a
fertilizer ordinance is required by Chapter 403.9337, Florida Statutes, and will be part of the
Watershed Management Plans.]
Policy 2.2.3:
Chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme caution. The
use of appropriate biological and mechanical (use of harvesting equipment to remove
vegetation) controls in both the canal system and stonnwater detention ponds is encouraged.
Manufacturers and EPA guidelines for chemical use in aquatic habitat will be followed.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.2.3 requires that chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with
extreme caution and encourages the use of biological and mechanical controls.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
staff develop an ordinance or LDC guidelines for the application of weed control.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Aquatic plant control is
necessary to keep the canal systems flow capacity adequate to prevent flooding. Maintenance
activities are regulated by State licensing and Federal label requirements. Operational policies will
be discussed in the Watershed Management Plans.]
Policy 2.2.4:
Continue and expand when needed the existing water quality monitoring program for sampling
canals and rivers and assess the data annually.
11
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.2.4 requires the continuation and expansion of the County's water quality sampling program.
Collier County Pollution Control Department (CCPCD) continues monitoring a fixed network of
surface water stations throughout the county. The network is evaluated every 3 years to determine the
relevancy of the sampling sites. If water quality problems are found that may impact public health, a
very intensive study area (VISA) is initiated to determine the source of the water quality problems.
The surface water quality data were assessed in 2007 by CCPCD; in 2008 by the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection under the Impaired Waters Rule Assessment; and will be reassessed in
2010 by CCPCD.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
staff use analysis of existing data to drive new data collection.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - The Policy remains
relevant and should be retained as written.]
{Board of County Commissioners (BCO Comment from the January 31. 20Il Adoption Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
Policy 2.2.5:
By December 31, 2008, and no less than every three years, stormwater management systems
shall be inspected and certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for compliance
with their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The deadline for Policy 2.2.5 has not been met, and the County has not identified stormwater
management systems that are not currently meeting State water quality treatment standards. The
County is developing a process for stormwater management systems, which is expected to be
completed by December 2015.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
an extended deadline to December 2015; and include a requirement to coordinate activities with the
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and FDEP.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
to add benchmarks within the Policy for the achievement of the stated objectives by year 2015.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy
is recommended at this time. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has been working
on an update to the statewide stormwater Rule that includes system inspections. The County is
following the development of this Rule and will wait to review the standards in the Rule prior to
adopting a local ordinance.]
{Board of Countv Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 20Il Ado/Jtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.}
OBJECTIVE 2.3:
All estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state and local water quality standards.
12
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Objective Achievement Analysis:
lbis Objective has not been met. Not all estuaries meet Federal or State water quality standards. The
Watershed Management Plans developed by the County will address measures to bring these water
bodies into compliance with State and Federal water quality standards. Currently, the County monitors
its water quality through the collection and evaluation of ground water and surface water samples.
lbis Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
include the development of a plan, in coordination with the FDEP, to meet applicable federal, state and
local water quality standards.
(Environmental Advisory Council rEA C) Comment from AUf!Ust 11, 2010 W orkshov - Suggesting that
staff consider monitoring locations.)
fPlanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the
Objective be retained as written.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff recommends
retaining the Objective as written.]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 2.3.4:
Continue to implement and refine a water quality and sediment monitoring program for the
estuarine system.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Department implemented a water quality monitoring program
in October of 2008. A water quality monitoring plan was written and approved. The Monitoring Plan
follows FDEP's Standard Operating Procedures and the Pollution Control Department's Lab
Procedures. Water quality sampling has been conducted in Cocohatchee Estuary for over a year; a
draft report of the data has been written. Also, water quality sampling started in November of 2009 in
Clam Bay. CZM is currently sampling the Cocohatchee and Clam Bay on a monthly basis. Master
plans will be developed with stakeholders as data and regulations are developed.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from August 11.2010 Workshov - Suggesting that
staff use the Watershed Management Plan effort to evaluate sampling points. Also, suggesting need
for a fertilizer ordinance to reduce discharges of nutrients into waterways.]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff recommends
retaining the Policy as written. A fertilizer ordinance is required by State statute and will be part of
the Watershed Management Plans.)
Policy 2.3.6:
The County will only allow development activities which will not adversely impact coastal
water resources. This is implemented through the following mechanisms:
a. Require all applicable Federal and State pennits addressing water quality to be
submitted to Collier County before Collier County issues a Final Development Order.
13
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
b. Excluding single family homes, any project impacting 5 acres or more of wetlands must
provide a pre and post development water quality analysis to demonstrate no increase in
nutrient, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc and copper
loading in the post development scenario.
c. By January 2008, the County shall undertake an assessment of the current model used
to evaluate pre and post development pollutant loadings referenced in (b) of this Policy.
At a minimum, the purpose of this assessment will be to verify the accuracy of the model
and to provide data evaluating stonnwater management structure design. In reviewing
the accuracy of the model, the County will include an evaluation of the reduction of lake
depths with time and the corresponding loss of retention volume, the impact of lake
stratification, and the need for aeration. The assessment will also include the sampling
of runoff from undisturbed sites and from pennitted stonnwater outfalls for the
parameters listed in Paragraph (b) of this Policy and pesticides. The results of the
assessment and recommendations regarding the pollutant loading analysis, revisions to
current model methodology, potential regulatory restrictions, and further monitoring
shall be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for further direction.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 2.3.6 requires the County to only allow development activities which will not adversely impact
coastal water resources. lbis is to be implemented by 1) requiring applicable Federal and State permits
addressing water quality to be submitted to Collier County before Collier County issues a Final
Development Order, 2) require projects, excluding single family homes, impacting 5 acres or more of
wetlands to provide a pre and post development water quality analysis to demonstrate no increase in
nutrient, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc and copper loading in the post
development scenario and 3) undertake an assessment of the current model used to evaluate these pre
and post development pollutant loadings.
Regarding, a pre-development vs. post-development analysis for nutrients, BOD, TSS, Pb, Zn, and Cu,
LDC section 10.02.02 A.3.aji indicates that the analysis shall be performed using "approved
methodologies" and only requires the analysis on nutrients. The methodology that has been used by the
US Army Corps of Engineers and is being developed by the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection is limited to nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus).
The original state stormwater regulations were based on a standard of 80 % removal of TSS. Current
evaluations of Florida stormwater regulation indicate the design needs to address increasing
concentrations of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in surface and ground water. Additionally other
significant pollutants are more easily removed than nitrogen or phosphorus (Harper, 2007). The draft
permitting handbook for the update of the state stormwater rule includes analysis only for nitrogen and
phosphorus loadings (FDEP, 2009). In the new model the pre development conditions are now
considered to be the conditions represented by the SWFFS Natural Systems Model. (lbis analysis
model is very similar to that proposed in Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater Regulations for
Southwest Florida, 2003)." The model proposed in the new stormwater rule is the preferred analysis,
by staff.
The FDEP evaluation of the stormwater rules in preparation of development of the proposed state-wide
stormwater rule addressed the issues identified in section c. Harper (2007) indicates that in wet
detention systems, nutrient treatment is primarily through the production of algae. He recommends that
only the top 12 feet of un-mixed systems be considered in the water quality treatment requirement.
(Deeper depths are recognized as storage of solids and treatment for other constituents.) Ibis is also
the recommendation of the "'Applicant's Handbook" for the proposed rule. The choice of whether to
aerate/mix wet detention systems or not is left to the applicant, but the treatment is only based on the
14
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
aerated portion. Additionally, the monitoring of solids accumulation to identify when impacts to
treatment volume is required annually. FDEP also studied runoff from native vegetative communities
(Harper 2009) and reported runoff characteristics for nutrients and metals.
Due to the change in emphasis of state regulatory programs limiting the loading analysis to nutrients
and the studies that have been produced by FDEP to support the proposed stormwater rule, Collier
County recommends removing the requirement for TSS, BOD, Pb, Zn, and Cu from the Policy in
section b, and delete section c.
Literature:
Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater Regulations for Southwest Florida Harvey Harper PhD., P.E..
David M. Baker P.E.. Environmental Research & Design. Inc. 2003
Evaluation of Current Stormwater Design Criteria within the State of Florida Harvey Harper PhD., P.E.,
David M. Baker P.E.. FDEP 2007
Environmental Resource Permit Stormwater Quality. Applicant's Handbook. Draft (July 2009). FDEP"
RunoffCharacreristics of Natural Vegetation Communities in Florida Draft Final Report September 2009.
Harvey Harper PhD., P.E. 2009. FDEP
OBJECTIVE 2.5:
The County will continue with the implementation of its estuarine management program by
requiring development to meet its current standards addressing stonnwater management, and
the protection of seagrass beds, dune and strand, and wetland habitats.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The estuarine management program has been implemented. The development of watershed
management plans for the County has been included elsewhere m the CCME. The estuarine
management program has been implemented through the following:
1. CCME Policies under Goals 2, 6, 7 and 11
2. LDC Sections
3.03.00 Coastal Zone Management
3.04.00 Protection of Endangered, Threatened, or Listed Species
3.05.01 Vegetation Removal, Protection, and Preservation
5.03.06 Dock Facilities (Protection of seagrass beds)
9.04.06 Variance to the Coastal Construction Setback Line
10.02.02.A Environmental Data Submittal Requirements
10.02.06.1 Vehicle-on-the-Beach Regulations
3. Manatee Protection Plan
4. County water quality monitoring program
5. Artificial reef program
6. Waterways management program
The Objective and associated Policies are no longer relevant and should be deleted.
{Planninf! Commission Comment from the AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
Objective and Policies be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation, and ongoing
maintenance of the estuarine management program.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adof)tion Hearing
The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC comment from the August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop.]
15
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC and CCPC recommendations that the Objective and Policies should be retained to ensure the
continuance of the estuarine management program.]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 2.5.1 :
Identify land use activities that have the potential to degrade the estuarine environmental
quality.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy is no longer relevant and should be removed (see Objective Achievement Analysis).
{Planning Commission Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
Policy be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation, and ongoing maintenance, of the
estuarine management program.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
CCPC recommendation.]
Policy 2.5.2:
This management program shall incorporate information obtained from the various watershed
management plans described elsewhere in this Element.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy is no longer relevant and should be removed (see Objective Achievement Analysis).
{Planninf! Commission Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the
Policy be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation, and ongoing maintenance of the
estuarine management program.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
CCPC recommendation.]
Policy 2.5.3:
This program shall in part be based on the estuarine data analyses and management
recommendations contained in the County's coastal management program's technical reports.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy is no longer relevant and should be removed (see Objective Achievement Analysis).
{Planninf! Commission Comment from the AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the
Policy be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation, and ongoing maintenance of the
estuarine management program.]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
CCPC recommendation.)
OBJECTIVE 3.1:
Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards.
Ground water quality shall be monitored in order to detennine whether development activities
16
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
are contributing to the degradation of Collier County's ground water quality. Ground water
data and land use activities will be assessed annually to determine long-term trends and
whether the County is meeting Federal and State regulatory standards for ground water
quality. The County shall require ground water monitoring of land uses in accordance with
Chapters 62-520, 62-550 and 62-777 of the Florida Administrative Code. Upon the detection of
any ground water degradation detennined through the monitoring process, the County will
notify the appropriate regulatory agencies.
In a coordinated effort with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), or of its own accord,
the County shall institute a groundwater monitoring network by 2008, including the
comprehensive inventory of monitoring wells, an assessment of monitoring wells previously
damaged, and policies to make appropriate well repairs and replacements.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
Collier County continues to implement numerous proactive programs designed to protect the County's
ground water quality from man-made pollution sources. However, due to natural conditions impacting
the water quality found in Collier County, some federal and state water quality conditions may not be
achievable. Suggest Objective be worded similar to goal to "ensure highest water quality practical". A
groundwater monitoring network was established by the County's Pollution Control Department in
2006. This monitoring network monitors seventy (70) ground water monitoring wells semiannually;
dry and wet season. These wells provide limited monitoring of the following land uses; agriculture,
commercial, golf course, park, rural residential, urban residential, utilities and wetland. Groundwater
quality is assessed annually and provided to the appropriate regulatory agencies for further
investigation of exceedances of State and Federal ground water quality standards. lbis network of
monitoring wells encompasses wells owned by USGS, City of Naples, Collier County Wastewater
Department and Collier County Water Department. Any monitoring well repairs or replacements
would be done at the owner's discretion.
In addition, Section 3.06 of the County's Land Development Code (Ground Water Protection) was
developed to protect existing and future wellfields, protect natural aquifer system recharge areas,
protect Countywide groundwater resources, and to protect the public health and resources through
regulation and establishment of standards for development involving the use, storage, generation,
handling, and disposal of quantities of hazardous products and hazardous waste in excess of identified
quantities, disposal of sewage and effluent, storm water management, earth mining, petroleum
exploration, solid waste, and other related aspects of land use and development.
Since a groundwater monitoring network was established in 2006, suggest Objective 3.1 be revised to
replace the second paragraph with "The County shall continue to institute a groundwater monitoring
network. "
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect the establishment of the monitoring network in 2006; include in first sentence of Objective the
phrase, ''to ensure highest water quality practical"; and, include a reference that monitoring activities
are ongomg.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that staff follow trends in salinity of various aquifers to determine trending over time.]
17
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
[Planninf! Commission Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the
Objective be retained as written, except to include a reference that the monitoring network has been
established .]
(Post EA C and CCPC W orksholJs and AdOlJtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
CCPC recommendation.]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 3.1.1:
Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as
follows:
1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones
defined as follows:
a) W-1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and
extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which
approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield).
b) W-2 is the land area between the W-1 boundary line and the ten percent ground water
capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two year ground water travel time to
the potable water wellfield).
c) W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent ground
water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five year ground water travel
time to the potable water wellfield).
d) W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground water
capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground water travel time
to the potable water wellfield).
2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows:
a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones.
b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3.
c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and
hazardous wastes: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3.
d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250
liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary
containment in W-1, W-2, W-3.
e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W-1.
f) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found in 40
CFR part 135.
g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based on
uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use.
h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited in
W-1 and W-2, conditional use required in W-3 and W-4.
i) Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater
than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-1 subject to complying with
construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low-pressure
lateral distribution.
j) On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and
subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-1, W-2, and W-3 shall
meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-10, F.A.C. as the rule
existed on August 31,1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring plan.
3. Conditional uses shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and where
impacts of the development will be isolated from the Surficial and Intermediate Aquifer.
18
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
There is one (1) policy within this Objective. Policy 3.1.1 contains criteria for the identification of
wellhead protection areas within the County's Future Land Use Map Series.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but paragraph 3 should be modified to: clarify the
conditional use reference pertains to those conditional uses required by this policy, as opposed to all
conditional uses allowed by the zoning district on a given property within a wellfield protection area;
and, remove or clarify the term "extraordinary circumstances." Additionally, the Policy will be
evaluated to determine if it would be more appropriately located in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE).
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!Ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggest
addressing the improvement of ground water monitoring in order to assess saltwater intrusion.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Implementation of the
EAC's recommendation will require the monitoring activities to be programmed andfimded.]
{Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Requested
that staff coordinate with the SFWMD and Big Cypress Basin Board to evaluate the location and number of
monitoring wells needed, and the potential funding opportunities, for improving ground water monitoring to
assess saltwater intrusion.}
OBJECTIVE 3.3:
Continue to identify, refine extents of, and map zones of influence and contribution around
potable wellfields in order to identify activities that must be regulated to protect ground water
quality near wellfields. (Refer to Objective 1.1 in the Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge
Sub-Element)
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy will be evaluated to
determine if it would be more appropriately located in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
Sub-Element (NGARSE).
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting
that staff assess the welljield in Immokalee that has a 10 year cone of depression extending under the
airport and acijoining industrial zoning.]
{Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - Implementation of the
EAC's recommendation will require the existing Model be acijusted to accommodate the lO-year Risk
Management Special Treatment Overlay zones, as the Model evaluates years 1, 2, 5 and 20 only.
(The cost to acijust the Model is unknown at this time.)]
{Board of Countv Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - No
expenditures are authorized to adjust the Model. as recommended by the EAC.}
OBJECTIVE 3.4
Collect and evaluate data and information designed to monitor the quality of ground water in
order to identify the need for additional protection measures. (Refer to Objective 1.3 in the
Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element.)
19
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Oblective Achievement Analysis:
As noted within Objective 3.1 (above), the County's Pollution Control Department established a
groundwater monitoring network that monitors seventy (70) ground water monitoring wells
semiannually. These data are assessed annually and submitted to the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD), where these data are maintained within their DBHYDRO database. The SFWMD
DBHYDRO database is located at:
http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/oage/portallpg grp sfwmd eraJpg sfwmd era dbhydrobrowser).
Objective 3.4 references Objective 1.3 in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub Element
(NGARSE). This statement should reference Objective 3.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect the correct reference in the NGARSE - Objective 3.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 3.4.1 :
Continue the existing water quality monitoring program to provide base-line data, evaluate
long-term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effectiveness of the
County's ground water protection program.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 3.4.1 requires the County to continue the existing water quality-monitoring program to provide
base-line data, evaluate long-term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the
effectiveness of the County's ground water protection program.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!USt 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
that staff add reference to salinity trending within the Policy.]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC's recommendation.)
Policy 3.4.4:
Gather and use appropriate data to refine and improve the database used in the County's
3-dimensional ground water model.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 3.4.4 recommends that the County gather and use appropriate data to refine and improve the
database used in the County's 3-dimensional ground water model.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy will be evaluated to
determine if it should be deleted from the CCME, as it already appears in the Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE).
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11.2010 Workshov - Suggesting
that staff add a provision for coordination with the SFWMD and Big Cypress Basin within the Policy.]
20
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EA C's recommendation.]
OBJECTIVE 4.1 :
Collect and evaluate data and information designed to more accurately detennine water use in
Collier County such as the County's database tracking all permitted wells and wells having
consumptive use permits.
{This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 4.1.2:
Work with the agricultural community to devise a method for determining agricultural
pumpage.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to indicate
that the County, in coordination with the South Florida Water Management District, will devise a
method for determining agricultural pumpage.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that staff insert a date for Policy achievement, assign department and add a requirement to coordinate
with SFWMD.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC's recommendation.]
OBJECTIVE 5.3:
The Collier County Engineering Services Department shall periodically assess the types,
quantities and location of minable mineral resources in Collier County.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect the current departmental reference.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 5.3.1 :
The Collier County Engineering Services Department shall work with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, the Florida Geological Survey and local mining industry officials to
inventory and assess the existing mineral reserves in Collier County. The inventory and
assessment will incorporate use of a GIS-based database of all areas within the County that
are pennitted, either by right, or through a conditional use penn it, to conduct mineral
extraction operations as well as the volume of fill that is pennitted to be removed for each
such active mineral extraction operation.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 5.3.1 recommends that the County work with the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection and the Florida Geological Survey and local mining industry officials to inventory and
evaluate the existing mineral reserves in Collier County.
21
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
the current departmental reference.
OBJECTIVE 6.1:
The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum
preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective
measurable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the
County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 6.1.1:
For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated
Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-Settlement
Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the
application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria,
unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the
ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the
ACSC requirements, this policy shall apply to all non-agricultural development except for
single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a
watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan
developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element.
Coastal High Hazard Area Non-Coastal High Hazard Area
Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres. 10%
Residential and Mixed Equal to or greater Equal to or greater than 5
Use Development than 2.5 acres 25% acres
and less than 20 acres. 15%
Equal to or
greater than 20 ac. 25%
Golf Course 35% 35%
Commercial and Less than 5 acres. 10% Less than 5 acres. 10%
Industrial
Development Equal to or greater Equal to or
than 5 acres. 15% greater than 5 acres. 15%
Industrial
Development (Rural- 50%, not to exceed 25% of 50%, not to exceed 250k of the
Industrial District only) the project site. project site.
22
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
The following standards and criteria shall apply to the vegetation retention requirements
referenced above.
(1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defined as a vegetative community
having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native
plant species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are
calculated based on the amount of "native vegetation" that confonns to this definition.
(2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under-story and ground
cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection
to offsite preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to
provide for a core area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the
interface between the preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts
from other land uses. Criteria for determining the dimensional standards of the
preserve are to be set out in the Land Development Code.
(3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy
shall be set aside as preserve areas. On-site and off-site preserve areas shall be
protected by a pennanent conservation mechanism to prohibit further development,
consistent with the requirements of this policy. The type of pennanent conservation
mechanism, including conservation easements, required for a specific development
may vary based on preserve area size, type of development approval, and other factors,
as set forth in the County's land development regulations.
(4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the
following criteria in descending order of priority:
a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as
corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to
facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement through the
site, consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element
b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks.
c. Onsite wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM,
unless pennitted for impact pursuant to Policy 6.2.4 of this Element. WRAP means
South Florida Water Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedures
as described in Technical Publication Reg 001 (September 1997, as updated August
1999). UMAM means Unifonn Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method as described
in Chapter 62-345, F.A.C.
d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area as identified in
Paragraph (4)c. above,
e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and
f. All other native habitats.
(5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to:
a. Passive recreational uses that do not impact the minimum required vegetation or
cause a loss of function to the preserve area. Loss of function to the preserve area
includes a reduction or a change in vegetation within the preserve and harming any
listed species present in the preserve. More specific standards that implement this
policy shall be set forth in the land development regulations and will address
various types of construction that are compatible with the function of the preserve.
The land development regulations will also provide criteria to define appropriate
passive recreational uses. The criteria will be established to allow for passive
recreational uses such as trails or boardwalks that provide for access within the
preserves, providing the uses do not reduce the minimum required vegetation or
cause harm to listed species.
b. Receipt of treated stonnwater discharge where such use, including conveyance,
treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts the naturally
occurring, native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation
23
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
and the harm to any listed species according to the policies associated with
Objective 7.1, as detennined by criteria set forth in land development regulations.
Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water
quality standards as set forth in Chapter 62-302. F.A.C. and will conform to the water
quality criteria requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management
District.
(6) A management plan shall be submitted for preserve areas identified by specific criteria
in the land development regulations to identify actions that must be taken to ensure
that the preserved areas will maintain natural diversity and will function as proposed.
The plan shall include methods to address control and treatment of invasive exotic
species, fire management, stonnwater management (if applicable), and maintenance
of pennitted facilities. If applicable, a listed species monitoring program shall be
submitted pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2) (i). State and federal management plans
consistent with the requirements of the LDC will be accepted.
(7) Until the land development regulations addressed in Policy 6.1.1(11) are developed,
exceptions, by means of mitigation in the form of increased landscape requirements
shall be granted for parcels that cannot reasonably accommodate both the
preservation area and the proposed activity. Criteria for allowing these exceptions
include:
(a) Where site elevations or conditions requires placement of fill thereby hanning or
reducing the survivability of the native vegetation in its existing locations;
(b) Where the existing vegetation required by this policy is located where proposed
site improvements are to be located and such improvements cannot be relocated as to
protect the existing native vegetation;
(c) Where native preservation requirements are not accommodated, the landscape
plan shall re-create a native plant community in all three strata (ground covers, shrubs
and trees), utilizing larger plant materials so as to more quickly re-create the lost
nature vegetation.
(8) Parcels that were legally cleared of native vegetation prior to January 1989 shall be
exempt from this requirement.
(9) Should the amount of wetland vegetation exceed the minimum vegetation requirements
as specified herein, retention of wetland vegetation having significant habitat or
hydrologic value is encouraged. Increased preservation shall be fostered thro
incentives including, but not limited to: clustered development, reduced developn
standards such as open space, setbacks, and landscape buffers, to allow for increased
areas of preserved wetland vegetation. Significant habitat or hydrologic value is
determined by wetland function, not the size of the wetland.
(10) Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land
development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property owner may submit
a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation retention
requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native
vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4)
than the land being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an
acceptable land acquisition program, as required by the land development regulations.
The monetary payment shall be used to purchase and manage native vegetative
communities off-site. The land development regulations shall provide criteria to
determine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon the
following provisions:
a. The amount, type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site;
b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site;
c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency
technical assistance;
d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing;
24
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the
preserve can remain functional; and
f. Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction,
including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way
acquisition area.
The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the
monetary value, land donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure
that native vegetative communities not preserved on-site will be preserved and
appropriately managed off-site.
(11) Right of Way acquisitions by any governmental entity for all purposes necessary for
roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities
within the right of way acquisition area, shall be exempt from mitigation requirements.
(12) Although the primary intent of this Policy is to retain and protect existing native
vegetation, there are situations where the application of the retention requirements of
this Policy is not possible. In these cases, creation or restoration of vegetation to
satisfy all or a portion of the native vegetation retention requirements may be allowed.
Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land
development regulations to determine the circumstances for when creation or
restoration is allowed and to specify criteria for creation and restoration.
(13) The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of
this Policy, except for the Native Vegetation Retention Requirements Table, and
provisions in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3,6, and 7. Within one year of the effective date of these
amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the
process for obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a
deviation by the appropriate review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of
a deviation administratively. The County shall consider the amount and type of native
vegetation and the presence of listed species in detennining whether the granting of a
deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted administratively.
The County may grant a deviation if:
a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in areas
which result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or
b. On or off-site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more
provisions of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser
quality, or
c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of
other Plan policies that encourage beneficial land uses.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.1.1 specifies that it is applicable to the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated
Area, Conservation Designated Area, and AgriculturallRural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial
District and Rural-Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, and that native vegetation
shall be preserved through the application of a series of preservation and vegetation retention standards
and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where
the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to:
reevaluate the scrivener's errors in subsections 6.1.1 (7 & 13); delete subsection 6.1.1 (7), since it is
already addressed by Policy 6.1.1 (12); and add an exemption from the native vegetation retention
requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for
conservation.
25
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
that staff insert within (5) b. the word, "acreage" after the phrase" ...loss of the minimum required
vegetation ... "]
[Planninf! Commission (CCPc) Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that
the Policy be revised to clearly express the intent that Federal and State parks, preserves andforests
shall comply with native vegetative retention requirements, but are not required to have a separate
preserve onsite and a preserve management plan.]
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adovtion Hearinf!-
The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC comment from the August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop.]
[Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC and CCPC recommendations.]
(Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Stqff shall
evaluate for possible elimination of native vegetation retention requirements for Industrial designated
properties under a certain acreage threshold)
Policy 6.1.2:
For the County's Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as designated on the FLUM, native
vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the following preservation and
vegetation retention standards and criteria:
Preservation and Native Vegetation Retention Standards:
a. Receiving Lands:
A minimum of 40% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 25% of the total site
area shall be preserved.
b. Neutral Lands:
A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site
area shall be preserved, except that, for Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 26 East,
located in the North Belle Meade Overlay, a minimum of 70% of the native vegetation
present, not to exceed 70% of the total site area, shall be preserved. Additionally, for
residential development in Section 24, if the dwelling units are not clustered, a
minimum of 90% of the slash pine trees present shall be retained. Further restrictions
are identified in the North Belle Meade Overlay in the FLUE. [The preceding 2
sentences in italics were adopted 1/25/07 but will NOT be applied or implemented by
Collier County. They relate to text in the Future Land Use Element's North Belle Meade
Overlay that was found to be "not in compliance" by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs in letter dated 5/1/07.]
c. Non-NRPA Sending Lands:
Calculated at the higher value of 80% of the native vegetation present, or as may
otherwise be pennitted under the Density Rating provisions of the FLUE;
d. NRPA Sending Lands:
Calculated at the higher value of 90% of the native vegetation present, or as may
otherwise be permitted under the Density Blending provisions of the FLUE.
e. Provisions a. through d. above shall also be consistent with the wetland protection
policies set forth under CCME Objective 6.2.
f. In order to ensure reasonable use and to protect the private property rights of owners
of smaller parcels of land within lands designated Rural Fringe Mixed Use District on
the Future Land Use Map, including nonconforming lots of record which existed on or
before June 22, 1999, for lots, parcels or fractional units of land or water equal to or
26
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
less than five (5) acres in size, native vegetation clearing shall be allowed, at 20% or
25,000 square feet of the lot or parcel or fractional unit, whichever is greater, exclusive
of any clearing necessary to provide for a 15-foot wide access drive up to 660 feet in
length. For lots and parcels greater than 5 acres but less than 10 acres, up to 20% of
the parcel may be cleared. This allowance shall not be considered a maximum clearing
allowance where other provisions of this Plan allow for greater clearing amounts. These
clearing limitations shall not prohibit the clearing of brush or under-story vegetation
within 200 feet of structures in order to minimize wildfire fuel sources.
g. Within Receiving and Neutral lands where schools and other public facilities are co-
located on a site, the native vegetation retention requirement shall be 30% of the native
vegetation present, not to exceed 25% of the site.
(1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defined as a vegetative community
having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant
species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are calculated on
the amount of "native vegetation" that conforms to this definition.
(2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under-story and ground cover,
emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection to offsite
preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to provide for a core
area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the interface between
the preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts from other land uses.
Criteria for determining the dimensional standards of the preserve are to be set out in the
Land Development Code.
(3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall be
set aside as preserve areas. On-site and off-site preserve areas shall be protected by a
permanent conservation mechanism to prohibit further development, consistent with the
requirements of this policy. The type of conservation mechanism, including conservation
easements, required for a specific development may vary based on preserve area size, type
of development approval, and other factors, as set forth in the County's land development
regulations.
(4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following
criteria in descending order of priority:
a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors
for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the
continued use of the site by listed species or the movement of wildlife through the site.
This criterion shall be consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this
element
b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks.
c. Onsite wetlands preserved pursuant to Policy 6.2.5 of this Element;
d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area, as identified in (4)c. above.
e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and
f. All other native habitats.
(5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to:
a. Passive recreational uses that do not impact the minimum required vegetation or cause
a loss of function to the preserve area. Criteria identifying what constitutes a loss of
function shall be set forth in the land development regulations and will address various
types of construction that are compatible with the function of the preserve. The land
development regulations will also provide criteria to define appropriate passive
recreational uses. The criteria will be established to allow for passive recreational uses
such as trails or boardwalks that provide for access within the preserves, providing the
uses do not reduce the minimum required vegetation or cause hann to listed species.
b. Receipt of treated stonnwater discharge where such use, including conveyance,
treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts on the naturally
occurring, native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and
the hann to any listed species according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1, as
27
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
determined by criteria set forth in the land development regulations. Discharge to
preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as
set forth in Chapter, 62-302 F.A.C. and will conform to the water quality criteria
requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District
(6) A management plan shall be submitted for all preserve areas identified by specific criteria
in the land development regulations to identify actions that must be taken to ensure that
the preserved areas will function as proposed. The plan shall include methods to address
control and treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, stormwater
management (if applicable), and maintenance of pennitted facilities. If applicable, a listed
species monitoring program shall be submitted pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2)(i).
(7) Off-site preservation shall be allowed to provide flexibility in the project design.
a. Within Receiving and Neutral Lands, off-site preservation shall be allowed for up to 50%
of the vegetation retention requirement
1. Off-site preservation areas shall be allowed at a ratio of 1:1 if such off-site
preservation is located within designated Sending Lands or at a ratio of 1.5:1
anywhere else.
2. Like for like preservation shall be required for Tropical Hardwood and Oak
Hammock vegetative communities.
b. Within non-NRPA Sending Lands, off-site preservation shall be allowed for up to 25% of
the site preservation or vegetative retention requirement, whichever is controlling.
1. Off-site preservation areas shall be contiguous to designated Sending Lands and
shall be allowed at a ratio of 3:1.
c. Off-site preservation shall not be allowed in NRPA Sending Lands.
(a) Density Bonus Incentives shall be granted to encourage preservation amounts greater
than that required in this policy, as provided for in the FLUE for Receiving Lands and
Rural Villages. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier
County shall adopt specific land development regulations to implement this incentive
program.
(9) On-site preservation areas shall also conform to the Open Space requirements as
specified in the Future Land Use Element. These preservations shall be part of and
counted towards the Open Space requirements.
(10) Existing native vegetation that is located contiguous to the natural reservation shall be
preserved pursuant to Policy 6.5.2 of this element Natural reservation is defined as that
specified in CCME Objective 6.5 of this element;
(11) Should the amount of wetland vegetation exceed the minimum vegetation requirements as
specified herein, retention of wetland vegetation having significant habitat or hydrologic
value is encouraged. Increased preservation shall be fostered through incentives
including, but not limited to: clustered development, reduced development standards
such as open space, setbacks, and landscape buffers, to allow for increased areas of
preserved wetland vegetation. Significant habitat or hydrologic value is determined by
wetland function, not the size of the wetland.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.1.2 specifies that within the County's Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as designated on the
FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of various vegetation
retention standards and criteria
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to reflect
the June 2010 Land Development Code amendments that implement specific subsections of the Policy;
and, add an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks,
preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation purposes.
28
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that
the Policy be revised to clearly express the intent that Federal and State parks, preserves andforests
shall comply with native vegetative retention requirements, but are not required to have a separate
preserve onsite and a preserve management plan.]
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adoption Hearinf!-
The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC comment from the August 27,2010 EAR Workshop.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC and CCPC recommendations.]
{Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Staff shall
evaluate for possible elimination of native vegetation retention requirements for Industrial designated
properties under a certain acreage threshold]
Policy 6.1.6:
Exemptions from the native vegetation retention requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 - The
requirements of Policy 6.1.2 shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses.
Existing use shall be defined as: those uses for which all required pennits were issued prior to
June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Conditional Use or Rezone petition was approved by
the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application was
submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include expansions
of those uses if such expansions are consistent with, or clearly ancillary to, the existing uses.
Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the
Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe area, and they may be built out in
accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall
also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies for the Rural
Fringe Area as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity.
On the County owned land located in Section 25, Township 26 E, Range 49 S (+/-360 acres), the
native vegetation retention and site preservation requirements may be reduced to 50% if the
permitted uses are restricted to the portions of the property that are contiguous to the existing
land fill operations; exotic removal will be required on the entire +/- 360 acres.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.1.6 makes all existing land uses exempt from the native vegetation retention requirements of
CCME Policy 6.1.2 if the effected land uses were issued prior to June 19,2002; or projects for which a
Conditional use or Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land
use petitions for which a completed application has been submitted prior to June 19,2002.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that the last sentence in the Policy be revised to read, "... exotic removal and preserve management
will be... "]
(Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as the Policy was adopted as part of the Final Order amendments in 2002 to
accommodate the expansion of the landfill. Preserve management is already required pursuant to
Policy 6.1.2 (6) of this Element.)
29
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
{Board of County Commissioners (BCe) Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.}
OBJECTIVE 6.2:
The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands
pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to
make this objective measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall
be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this
Element
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting
staff include within the Objective the requirement for mitigation within the same drainage area as the
initial wetland impact.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will be
addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland
impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.]
(Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 AdoJJtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 6.2.1
As required by Florida Administrative Code 9J5-5.006(1)(b), wetlands identified by the 1994-95
SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series.
These areas shall be verified by a jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this
element, at the time of project permitting to determine the exact location of jurisdictional
wetland boundaries.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.2.1 requires that wetlands as identified by the 1994-95 SFWMD land use and land cover
inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series. These areas are to be verified by
jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this element, at the time of project permitting
to determine the exact location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include
the correct Florida Administrative Code reference - "9J-5.006(1)(b)"; and, include the current SFWMD
land use and land cover inventory reference.
Policy 6.2.3:
Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural
functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. This wetland preservation and
conservation process shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plan process, as
referenced in Objective 2.1 of this Element. However, the process outlined within this policy is
primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away
from large interconnected wetland systems. These wetland systems have been identified
based on their type, values, functions, sizes, conditions and locations within Collier County.
30
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
These systems predominantly occur east of the County's Urban boundary, as delineated on
the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM), within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE).
Many of these wetlands fall within public lands or land targeted for acquisition. High quality
wetlands systems located on private property are primarily protected through native
vegetation preservation requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation
easements, or Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or via the NRPA or Sending
designations within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District or land/easement acquisition, or
innovative landowner incentives. Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems
located within the northeastern portion of Collier County, excluding the community of
Immokalee, are contained in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) of the
FLUE (and as depicted on the FLUM). Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems
located within the Urban and Estates designated areas of the County shall be based upon the
jurisdictional detenninations made by the applicable state or federal agency. Where pennits
issued by such state or federal agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within Urban and
Estates designated areas and require mitigation for such impacts, the pennitting agency's
mitigation requirements shall be deemed to preserve and protect wetlands and their functions,
except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County
shall direct impacts away from such wetlands.
The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County shall
be protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher
intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the remaining
allowable land uses. Collier County shall direct incompatible land uses away from these large
landscape scale wetland systems through implementation of the following protection and
conservation mechanisms:
(1) Conservation Designation
Best available data indicates that 76% of all wetlands found in Collier County are
contained within the boundaries of the Conservation Designation as depicted on the
Countywide Future Land Use Map. The overall purpose of the Conservation
Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of Collier County and
their associated environmental, recreational, and economic benefits. The allowed
land uses specified in the FLUE's Conservation Designation (Reference FLUE Land
Use Designation Section IV.) will accommodate limited residential development and
future non-residential development. These limitations support Collier County's
comprehensive process to direct concentrated population growth and intensive land
development away from large connected wetland systems.
(2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC)
Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the Big
Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay. The land development regulations
contained in the ACSC Overlay District, as depicted on the Countywide Future Land
Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the goal of directing higher intensity land
uses away from wetland systems. The development standards for the ACSC
Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section V.) specify that site
alterations shall be limited to 10% of the total site. The majority of the land
contained within the ACSC is also within the Conservation Designation and thus is
subject to the land use limitations of that Land Use Designation.
(3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs)
Major wetland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to establish the
NRPA Overlay District as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and as discussed in
FLUE Land Use Designation, Section V.C. These areas include high functioning
wetland systems and, although portions of the NRPA Overlay include lands within
the Conservation Designation, represent approximately 12% of the County's
wetlands, which are not located in Conservation Lands. Based on the relatively high
concentration of wetlands within NRPA designated lands, incompatible land uses
31
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
shall be directed away from these areas. Allowable land uses within NRPAs are also
subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 90%.
(4) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands . ..
Best available data indicates that 16,000+ acres of wetlands are contamed wlthm
designated Sending Lands and that such wetlands constitute approximately 70% of
land cover in these areas. Incompatible land uses are directed away from the Rural
Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands through an incentive-based Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) Program that allows land owners within these Sending
Lands to transfer their residential density out of the Sending Lands to Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District (and limited Urban) Receiving Lands. A complete description of
the TDR Program is contained in the FLUE, Future Land Use Designation
Description Section, AgriculturaURural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
Incompatible land uses are also directed away from Sending Lands through
restrictions on allowable uses. Finally, allowable uses within these lands are also
subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 80% to 90%, as
required by Policy 6.7.1 ofthis Element
(5) Flowway Stewardship Areas [re-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and
2002-54]
Flowway Stewardship Areas have been designated within the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and are
shown on the Rural Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Map Series. Flowway
Stewardship Areas (FSAs) are for the most part privately owned wetlands that are
located within the Camp Keais Strand and Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands
form the principal wetland flowway systems in the RLSA. The Overlay provides an
incentive to pennanently protect FSAs through the creation and transfer of
Stewardship Credits. It also contains provisions that eliminate incompatible uses
from the FSAs and, which establish protection measures.
(6) Watershed Management Plans
Collier County will establish watershed management plans throughout the County, but
with particular emphasis on the Urban and Estates designated areas. These watershed
management plans shall be established in accordance with Objective 2.1 of this
Element and will include the preservation or, where feasible, creation of landscape-
scale wetland conservation areas to act as habitat, natural water quality treatment and
water quantity retention/detention areas. The County shall direct incompatible land
uses away from such large-scale wetlands.
Collier County shall allow for more intensive development to occur in Rural Fringe
Receiving Lands, North Golden Gate Estates, the Rural-Settlement Area District, and
the Urban Designated Areas subject to the land uses identified in the Future Land Use
Element, the Immokalee Area Master Plan, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan.
These areas account for only 6% of Collier County's wetlands. Except for tidal
wetlands within the coastal portion of the Urban Designated Area and wetlands that are
part of an established watershed management plan, the County finds that the wetland
systems in these areas are more fragmented and altered than those systems located
within the Conservation Lands, ACSC and NRPA Overlays, and Rural Fringe Sending
Lands.
On a project-specific basis, wetlands and wetland functions shall be protected through
the following mechanisms:
(1) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland pennitting;
(2) Vegetation preservation policies supporting CCME Objective 6.1;
(3) Wetland protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2;
(4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE
(5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed management
plan, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element
32
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(6) Land or easement acquisition.
(7) Land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief, or USDA
grants for restoration.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.2.3 requires Collier County to implement a comprehensive process to ensure that wetlands
and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. The process outlined within this
policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away
from large connected wetland systems. High quality wetlands systems located on private property are
primarily protected through native vegetation preservation requirements, or through existing PUD
commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or through the
Natural Resource Protection Areas or Sending designations in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District.
The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County are protected
through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land uses and
require specific land development standards for the remaining allowable land uses.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
[Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that provision (6) of the Policy be revised to include that the watershed management plans contain
designated areas to be protected from development so as to preserve habitat, water flows, recharge
areas and to prevent future flooding.)
[Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans.]
{Board of Countv Commissioners (BCO Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
Policy 6.2.5:
Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais
Strand System which is contained within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, Collier
County shall direct land uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts
within wetlands based upon the vegetation requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element, the
wetland functionality assessment described in paragraph (2) below, and the final permitting
requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. A direct impact is hereby
defined as the dredging or filling of a wetland or adversely changing the hydroperiod of a
wetland. This policy shall be implemented as follows:
(1) The County shall apply the vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this
element to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall
be preserved as part of this vegetation requirement according to the following criteria:
a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element shall be met by preserving
wetlands with the highest wetland functionality scores. Wetland functionality
assessment scores shall be those described in paragraph (2) of this policy.
Wetlands having a WRAP score of at least 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation
Assessment Method score of 0.7 shall be preserved on site. This policy is not
intended in all cases to require preservation of wetlands exceeding the acreage
required by Policy 6.1.2 of this element. Within one year, the County shall develop
specific criteria to be used to determine when wetlands having a WRAP score
greater than 0.65 or a Unifonn Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of
greater than 0.7 shall be required to be retained exceeding the acreage required by
Policy 6.1.2 of this element.
33
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(2) In order to assess the values and functions of wetlands at the time of project review,
applicants shall rate functionality of wetlands using the South Florida Water
Management Districfs Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), as described in
Technical Publication Reg-001, dated September 1997, and updated August 1999, or the
Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method, F.A.C. Chapter 62-345. The applicant
shall submit to County staff, agency accepted WRAP scores or Unifonn Wetland
Mitigation Assessment Method scores. County staff shall review this functionality
assessment as part of the County's EIS provisions and shall use the results to direct
incompatible land uses away from the highest functioning wetlands according to the
requirements found in paragraph (1) above.
(3) All direct impacts shall be mitigated for pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (6) of
this policy.
(4) Single family residences shall follow the requirements contained within Policy 6.2.7 of
this element
(5) The County shall separate preserved wetlands from other land uses with appropriate
buffering requirements. The County shall require a minimum 50-foot vegetated upland
buffer adjacent to a natural water body, and for other wetlands a minimum 25-foot
vegetated upland buffer adjacent to the wetland. A structural buffer may be used in
conjunction with a vegetative buffer that would reduce the vegetative buffer width by
50%. A structural buffer shall be required adjacent to wetlands where direct impacts are
allowed. Wetland buffers shall conform to the following standards:
a. The buffer shall be measured landward from the approved jurisdictional line.
b. The buffer zone shall consist of preserved native vegetation. Where native
vegetation does not exist, native vegetation compatible with the existing soils and
expected hydrologic conditions shall be planted.
c. The buffer shall be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined
by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council.
d. The following land uses are considered to be compatible with wetland functions and
are allowed within the buffer:
1. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks and recreational shelters;
2. Pervious nature trails;
3. Water management structures;
4. Mitigation areas;
5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is
comparable in nature with the foregoing uses.
e. A structural buffer may consist of a stem-wall, berm, or vegetative hedge with
suitable fencing.
(6) Mitigation shall be required for direct impacts to wetlands in order to result in no net
loss of wetland functions.
a. Mitigation Requirements:
1. "No net loss of wetland functions" shall mean that the wetland functional score
of the proposed mitigation equals or exceeds the wetland functional score of the
impacted wetlands. However, in no case shall the acreage proposed for
mitigation be less than the acreage being impacted.
2. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands
shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or
conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland.
3. Protection shall be provided for preserved or created wetland or upland
vegetative communities offered as mitigation by placing a conservation
easement over the land in perpetuity, providing for initial exotic plant removal
(Class I invasive exotic plants defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council)
and continuing exotic plant maintenance.
4. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration,
the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (6)a.1, (6)a.2, and
34
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(6)a.3 of this policy. If agency permits have not provided mitigation consistent
with this policy, Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that of the
jurisdictional agencies.
5. Mitigation requirements for single-family lots shall be determined by the State
and Federal agencies during their pennitting process, pursuant to the
requirements of Policy 6.2.7 of this element
b. Mitigation Incentives:
1. Collier County shall encourage certain types of mitigation by providing a variety
of incentives in the form of density bonuses and credits to open space and
vegetation retention requirements. Density bonuses shall be limited to no more
than 10% of the allowed density.
2. Preferred mitigation activities that would qualify for these incentives include, but
are not limited, to the following:
(a) Adding wetland habitat to or restoring wetland functions within Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District Sending Lands,
(b) Creating, enhancing or restoring wading bird habitat to be located near
wood stork, and/or other wading bird colonies.
3. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier County
shall adopt specific criteria in the LDC to implement this incentive program, and
to identify other mitigation priorities.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.2.5 requires that within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Collier County is to direct land
uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts within wetlands based upon the
vegetation requirements of Policy 6.1.2. lbis policy was adopted as part of the County's Rural Fringe
Amendments. Although Policy 6.2.5 states the vegetation requirements for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District and that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System which is contained within the
lmmokalee Urban Designated Area, shall be based upon the native vegetation retention requirements
of Policy 6.1.2 of this Element, the Policy does not specify the percent requirement of retained native
vegetation which applies to that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System which is
contained within the lmmokalee Urban Designated Area This should be clarified in Policy 6.2.5
and/or in Policy 6.1.2. Section 6.2.5 (6)(5)(b)(3) should be removed as the specific criteria to
implement the incentive program and to identify other mitigation priorities have previously been
adopted in the Land development Code.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11.2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting
that specific native vegetation requirements for Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System be clarified.]
(Collier Countv Planning Commission rccPC) Comment from the August 27. 2010 Workshop-
Suggesting that specific native vegetation requirements for Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System
be clarified]
(Post Collier Countv Planninf! Commission rCCPC) Staff Comment - Native vegetation retention
standards for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System will be addressed as part of the Immokalee
Area Master Plan amendments.]
(Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adoption Hearing-
Suggesting that any necessary cross reference(s) to another Element be provided]
{Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and Ado[Jtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EA C and CCPC recommendations.]
35
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy 6.2.7:
Within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County shall rely on the
wetland jurisdictional detenninations and permit requirements issued by the applicable
jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan
preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. This policy shall be
implemented as follows:
(1) For single-family residences within Southem Golden Gate Estates or within the Big Cypress
Area of Critical State Concern, the County shall require the appropriate federal and state
wetland-related permits before Collier County issues a building permit.
(2) Outside of Southern Golden Gate Estates and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern,
Collier County shall inform applicants for individual single-family building permits that federal
and state wetland permits may be required prior to construction unless the proposed residence
is within a watershed management conservation area
identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective
2.1 of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the
issuance of a building permit. The County shall also notify the applicable federal and state
agencies of single-family building permits applications in these areas.
(3) Within North Golden Gate Estates and the Rural Settlement Area, Collier County shall
incorporate certain preserved and/or created wetlands and associated uplands into the
County's approved watershed management plans, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element. The size
and location of wetlands incorporated into the watershed management plans will be based upon
the approved requirements for such plans. The County may issue single-family building permits
within or adjacent to such wetlands, subject to appropriate mitigation requirements, which
preserve the functionality of the wetland within the applicable watershed management plan. For
a proposed residence which is to be located within a watershed management conservation area
identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective
2.1 of this Element, the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
(4) Collier County shall continue to work with federal and state agencies to identify properties that
have a high probability of wetlands and animal listed species occurrence. The identification
process will be based on hydric soils data and other applicable criteria. Once this identification
process is complete, the County will determine if the process is sufficiently accurate to require
federal and state wetland approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit within these areas.
The County shall use information on wetland and/or listed species occurrence to inform
property owners of the potential existence of wetlands and/or listed species on their property.
(5) Within one year after Watershed Management Plans are accepted by the Board of County
Commissioners, Collier County shall develop and implement additional means to protect
wetland systems identified in each Plan for preservation or restoration. Means to consider
include innovative landowner incentives, transferable development rights, tax relief, land or
easement acquisition, state and federal grants, and enhanced regulations.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.2.7 stipulates that within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the
County is to rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the
applicable Jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan
preserve area.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
(Environmental Advisory Council rEAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11.2010 Workshov - Suggesting
that wetland mitigation occur within the same watershed.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further,
36
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determine by the BCC with the adoption of the
Watershed Management Plans.]
[Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 AdOPtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
OBJECTIVE 6.3
The County shall protect and conserve submerged marine habitats.
[This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 6.3.2
Impacts to sea-grass beds shall be minimized by locating boat docks more than 10 feet from
existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks shall be sited to impact the
smallest areas of sea-grass beds possible, be no lower than 3.5 feet NGVD, have a terminal
platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no wider than 4 feet.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.3.2 stipulates that impacts to sea-grass beds are to be minimized by locating boat docks more
than 10 feet from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks are to be sited in such
manner as to impact the smallest area of sea-grass beds possible, and to be no lower than 3.5 feet
NGVD, have a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no wider
than 4 feet.
lbis Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that a reference to the required maintenance dredging permit be inserted within the Policy; and
additional Policies be added, if necessary. to protect sea grasses from dredging activities.}
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearings - Starr Comment - No change is
recommended, as dredging is regulated by the State of Florida and Federal government, not the
County. Maintenance dredging is generally allowed by these agencies. Mitigation may be required and
determined during permitting with the State and Federal agencies.
Seagrass protection issues are required to be addressed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission pursuant to the Florida Manatee Management Plan adopted by the State in December
2007. The plan calls for implementation of a statewide seagrass management plan, creation of an
interagency statewide seagrass monitoring plan, and evaluation of the feasibility of a rule for the
protection of the state's seagrass resources.]
(Board of Countv Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the Januarv 31. 2011 Adoption Hearinfl - Concurs
with the post EAe and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings stqff comments.)
Policy 6.3.3
The protection of sea-grass beds shall be a factor in establishing new, or revising existing,
speed zones to regulate boat traffic.
37
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 6.3.3 states that the protection of sea-grass beds is to be a factor in establishing new, or in
revising existing, speed zones to regulate boat traffic. Due to the new FWC Rule Change, FWC does
not allow for speed zones to be established based on benthic resources.
This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that the Policy be retained, but revised to reflect protection of manatee habitat.]
{Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from the August 27.2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that
the Policy be retained as written.]
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 Adoption Hearing-
Suggesting that the Policy be retained as written.]
{Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearings - Sta(fComment - Staff concurs with the
EAC and CCPC that the Policy should be retained as written}
OBJECTIVE 7.1:
The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their
habitats. The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify
species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of
special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of
special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and
those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species
published in 50 CFR 17.
(This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 7.1.2
Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA Overlay, non-
agricultural development, excluding individual single family residences, shall be directed away
from listed species and their habitats by complying with the following guidelines and
standards:
(1) A wildlife survey shall be required for all parcels when listed species are known to inhabit
biological communities similar to those existing on site or where listed species are directly
observed on the site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements
of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The County shall notify the FFWCC and USFWS of
the existence of any listed species that may be discovered.
(2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be submitted for County
approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated listed
species are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These
plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed
species and their habitats.
(a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species and
their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall
be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and
38
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between
wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as
fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development
impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors.
Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads
must cross wildlife corridors
1. The following references shall be used, as appropriate, to prepare the required
management plans;
a. South Florida Multi-8pecies Recovery Plan, USFWS, 1999.
b. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region,
USFWS, 1987.
c. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus
polyphemus) Populations found on Lands Slated for Large Scale Development in
Florida, Technical Report No.4, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission, 1987.
d. Ecology and Development-Related Habitat Requirements of the Florida Scrub
Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and
Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991.
e. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of the Southeastern American Kestrel
(Falco Sparverius Paulus) on Large-scale Development Sites in Florida,
Nongame Techincal Report No. 13, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission, 1993.
2. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and
the FFWCC, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
3. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as
denning, foraging or other indications, priority shall be given to preserving the listed
species habitats first, as a part of the retained native vegetation requirement
contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 this element. The County shall also
consider the recommendations of other agencies, subject to the provisions of
paragraph (3) of this policy.
(b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given
to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest
number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher
tortoise preserves.
(c) Habitat preservation for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) shall conform
to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and Fresh Water
Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a
maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to
maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness
program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the
scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida
Multi-8pecies Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of
this policy.
(d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans
shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The
plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nesting
season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-
Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the proviSions of paragraph (3) of this
policy.
(e) For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection
plan shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize
impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall
be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that
remain. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-
39
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this
policy.
(f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus american us floridanus) may be present,
the management plans shall require that garbage be placed in bear-proof containers, at
one or more central locations. The management plan shall also identify methods to
inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and
humans. Mitigation for impacting habitat suitable for black bear shall be considered in
the management plan.
(g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management
plan shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred
by the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to
currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood
hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses of
the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf
courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be designed
and managed using standards found in that district. The management plans shall
identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address
the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved
vegetative communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. These requirements
shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-8pecies Recovery Plan, May
1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(h)ln order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest
along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit
outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and landscape or
accent lighting shall be prohibited. These requirements shall be consistent with the
UFWS South Florida Multi-8pecies Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions
of Policy 7.1.2(3).
(i) The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater
than 10 acres.
(3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize
recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in
issuing development orders on property containing listed species. It is recognized that
these agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may change the requirements
contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such change shall be deemed
consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.1.2 provides guidelines and standards for directing non-agricultural development, except for
individual single-family residences, away from listed species and their habitats. This policy does not
apply to lands located within the RLSA.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to
remove the references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy; add a general
reference to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance, since the
most current information used by these agencies should be used in protecting listed species; and, delete
the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such mitigation is required by the FFWCC or
USFWS.
{Environmental Advisory Council mAG Comment trom the Auwst 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
to add a provision in (e) to encourage the retention of old growth slash pines for RCW nesting
habitat.]
40
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
{Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDfion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as the Policy requires adverse impacts to active red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW)
clusters and their foraging habitat be minimized, and where adverse effects cannot be avoided, to
compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. Old growth slash pines may not necessarily be
located in the best RCW foraging habitat, depending on how impacted the site is, and may be more
sensitive to die off with habitat restoration efforts.]
[Board of Countv Commissioners (BCG) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearinfl - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.]
Policy 7.1.3
For the County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay, as designated on the FLUM,
listed species shall protected pursuant to the RLSA policies found in the Future Land Use
Element.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.1.3 requires that, for the County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay, as
designated on the FLUM, listed species are to be protected pursuant to the RLSA policies found in the
Future Land Use Element.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment trom the August 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
to add the word, "be" before "protected" in the Policy text.]
{Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and Adoption Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EA C and CCPC recommendations.]
Policy 7.1.6:
The County shall evaluate the need for the protection of listed plants and within one (1) year of
the effective date of this amendment adopt land development regulations addressing the
protection of listed plants.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, as the Land Development Code amendment to
implement this Policy has been adopted.
{Planning Commission (CCPe) Comment from the AUf!ust 27.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that
the Policy be retained, but revised to reflect the continuance of the Policy objective.]
{Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and Adoption Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC and CCPC recommendations.]
OBJECTIVE 7.2
Historical data from 1990-1996 shows that the average number of manatee deaths in Collier
County due to incidents with watercraft is approximately 3.2 per year per 10,000 boats.
Through Policies 7.2.1 through 7.2.3, the County's objective is to minimize the number of
manatee deaths due to boat related incidents.
41
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
Collier County's Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01) was adopted within the Collier County Land
Development Code (LDc, Section 2.6.22 by adoption of Ordinance No. 95-58) in May of 1995, but
was not officially adopted into the County's Growth Management Plan until December 16, 2003, by
the adoption of Ordinance 2003-67. The Manatee Protection Plan (MPP) has played a pivotal role in
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCc) decision-making process since its
adoption. In the years since the MPP was adopted, the FFWcc's Bureau of Protected Species
Management's permitting staff has depended primarily upon the MPP to provide consistent direction
for the siting of boat facilities within Collier County's jurisdictional waters. Moreover, the MPP lays
out regulatory groundwork for the protection of manatee habitat, such as seagrass beds.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on manatee deaths in Collier County waters.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 7.2.2:
Sea-grass beds shall be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of
this element.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.2.2 stipulates that sea-grass beds are to be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1,
6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this element.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
the proposed deletion of Policy 6.3.3, as it is no longer relevant.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the August 11. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting
to retain the reference to Policy 6.3.3 within the Policy.]
(Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDtion HearinfIs - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EA C recommendation.]
OBJECTIVE 7.3:
Analysis of historical data from 1996-1999 shows that the average number of sea turtle
disorientations in Collier County is approximately equal to 5% of the hatchlings from all nests
in the County. Through the following policies, the County's objective is to minimize the
number of sea turtle disorientations.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on sea turtle disorientation as follows, "Analysis of
historical data from 2005 - 2009 shows that the average number of sea turtle disorientations in Collier
County is approximately equal to 4% of all the nests in the County..."
Policy Relevance:
Policy 7.3.1:
The County shall apply the lighting criteria contained in Policy 7.1.2(2)(i) of this element in
order to protect sea turtle hatchlings from adverse lighting conditions.
42
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.3.1 requires the County to apply the lighting criteria contained in Policy 7.1.2(2)(i) of this
element in order to protect sea turtle hatchlings from adverse lighting conditions.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but the reference to Policy 7.1.2(2)(i) should be
revised to read, 7.1.2(2)(h).
OBJECTIVE 7.4:
The County shall continue to improve marine fisheries productivity by building additional
artificial reefs.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 7.4.1 :
The County should continue to apply for reef construction grants and annually place more
materials on the existing permitted sites.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 7.4.1 states that the County should continue to apply for reef construction grants and annually
place more materials on the existing permitted sites. Collier County applies for artificial reef grants
through FWC on a yearly basis. Since 2004, the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Department has
been awarded three FWC grants for reef monitoring and deployment. Also, CZM staff has applied for
other grants through NOAA for marine debris removal.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to refer to
"other funding opportunities."
OBJECTIVE 9.1:
The County shall implement and update biennially a hazardous materials emergency response
element as part of its Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 9.1.6:
A training program shall be developed for emergency response personnel.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 9.1.6 requires a training program to be developed for emergency response personnel.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but the Policy should be revised to reflect that a
training program has been established.
Policy 9.1.7:
The Collier County Emergency Management Department shall be responsible for developing,
implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of the plan, including periodic updates.
43
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 9.1.7 tasks the Collier County Emergency Management Department with developing,
implementing and periodically updating the hazardous materials emergency response element.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but the Policy should be revised to reflect current
departmental reference.
OBJECTIVE 9.2:
The County shall verify the management and disposal practices of identified businesses that
are potential generators of hazardous waste, at a rate of 20% of these businesses per year.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 9.2.3:
The Collier County Pollution Control and Prevention Department shall work with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to establish a new cooperative agreement
between the County and FDEP. The purpose of this agreement shall be to ensure an
additional layer of regulatory oversight in enforcing businesses to be compliant with federal,
state and local hazardous waste management regulations.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 9.2.3 states that, Collier County Pollution Control Department shall work with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to establish a new cooperative agreement between
the County and FDEP. The purpose of this agreement shall be to ensure an additional layer of
regulatory oversight in enforcing businesses to be compliant with federal, state and local hazardous
waste management regulations.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
that the cooperative agreement has been established and will be maintained; suggest deleting "establish
a new" and replace with, "and maintain a."
OBJECTIVE 9.4:
The County shall continue to implement its local storage tank compliance program.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 9.4.3:
All storage tank systems in Collier County shall adhere to the provisions of Section 62-761 or
62-762, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) as applicable. Unless otherwise provided for
within Section 62-761, F.A.C., individual storage tank systems shall adhere to the provisions of
Section 62-761, F.A.C., in effect at the time of approval of the storage tank system.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 9.4.3 states that all tank systems shall adhere to the provisions of Sections 62-761 or 62-762,
Florida Administrative Code, as applicable.
44
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to delete
the second sentence, as it is redundant.
OBJECTIVE 10.1:
Priorities for shoreline land use shall be given to water dependent uses over water related land
uses and shall be based on type of water-dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding
marine and upland habitat considerations. The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR-
SP-93-01) May 1995 restricts the location of marinas and may limit the number of wet slips, the
construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan's marina siting
criteria.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 10.1.1:
Priorities for water-dependent and water-related uses shall be:
a. Public recreational facilities over private recreational facilities;
b. Public Boat Ramps;
c. Marinas
1. Commercial (public) marinas over private marinas;
2. Dry storage over wet storage;
d. Commercial fishing facilities;
e. Other non-polluting water-dependent industries or utilities;
f. Marine supply/repair facilities;
g. Residential development.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 10.1.1 prioritizes water-dependent and water-related uses according to public and private
recreational facilities, public boat ramps, marinas, commercial fishing facilities, other non-polluting
water-dependent industries or utilities, marine supply/service facilities, and residential development.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
This Policy is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statues, which were adopted into law in
2005, as follows:
163.3178 (2)(g): Expands requirement of coastal element to include strategies that will be used
to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts, as defined in s. 342.07, F.S.
[The CCME already contains marina siting criteria and the FLUE allows water dependent and
water related uses in the Urban designated waterfronts. Conservation designated lands do not
allow marinas.]
(Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment trom the August 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting
that additional strategies to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts be included
within the CCME.)
Policy 10.1.5:
Marinas and all other water-dependent and water-related uses shall conform to all applicable
regulations regarding development in marine wetlands. Marinas and water-dependentlwater-
related uses that propose to destroy wetlands shall provide for general public use.
45
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 10.1.5 requires marinas and all other water-dependent and water-related uses to conform to all
applicable regulations regarding development in marine wetlands. Where wetlands are proposed to be
destroyed, public access shall be provided.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised for proper
sentence structure and to consistently refer to marine wetlands (perhaps modify second sentence to
replace "Marinas" with "Development of marinas" and to insert "marine" before "wetlands").
{Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from the AUf!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that
the term "marine wetlands" be reworded for clarity.]
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 2010 AdoDtion Hearinf! -
Suggesting that clarification or definition of "marine wetlands" is needed]
Policy 1 0.1.6:
All new marinas, water-dependent and water-related uses that propose to destroy viable,
naturally functioning marine wetlands shall be required to perform a fiscal analysis in order to
demonstrate the public benefit and financial feasibility of the proposed development.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 10.1.6 requires all new marinas, water-dependent and water-related uses that propose to destroy
viable, naturally functioning marine wetlands to perform a fiscal analysis in order to demonstrate the
public benefit and financial feasibility of the proposed development. It is not appropriate to refer only
to "viable, naturally functioning marine wetlands" as the proposed destruction of any marine wetlands
should be subject to the fiscal analysis requirement. Also, it is not necessary to refer to "public
benefit" in this policy since Policy 10.1.5 requires such uses to be available "for general public use"
which is a public benefit.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised for proper
sentence structure and to perhaps modify to: replace "All" with "For development of all"; insert ", the
applicant" following "wetlands"; and, to delete both "viable, naturally functioning" and "public benefit
and. "
OBJECTIVE 1 0.2:
The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain
available to the public and continue with its program to expand the availability of such access
and a method to fund its acquisition.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy 1 0.2.1 :
Existing access for the public to the beach shall be maintained by new development. New
beachfront development shall show on their site-plans existing beach access ways and the
proposed development shall continue that access way, relocate it on the site, or donate it to
the County.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
46
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy 10.2.1 requires that existing access for the public to the beach is to be maintained by new
development. New beachfront development will show on their site-plans existing beach access ways
and the proposed development will continue that access way, relocate it on the site, or donate it to the
County. Further, the County maintains beach access after it has been transferred via deed or easement.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, to make the Policy consistent with
Objective 1.1, the Policy should be revised to read, ".. . relocate it on the site as deemed appropriate by
Collier County..."
OBJECTIVE 1 0.3:
Undeveloped coastal barriers shall be maintained predominantly in their natural state and their
natural function shall be protected, maintained and enhanced.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUJ!Ust 11. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting
that a reference to maps contained in the Land Development Code be added]
{Post EA C and CCPC Workshops and AdoDtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - The undeveloped coastal
barriers identified in the text of the Land Development Code and CCME Policy 10.6.1 are identified by
the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System. A reference to the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources
System maps should be provided in CCME Objective 10.3.]
(Board of County Commissioners rBCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adovtion Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments. 7
OBJECTIVE 10.4:
Developed coastal barriers and developed shorelines shall be continued to be restored and
then maintained, when appropriate by establishing mechanisms or projects which limit the
effects of development and which help in the restoration of the natural functions of coastal
barriers and affected beaches and dunes.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to
reflect needed grammatical changes, such as "Developed coastal barriers and developed shorelines
shall continue to be restored and maintained. Establish mechanisms or projects which limit the effects
of development and restores the natural functions of coastal barriers including beaches and dunes."
{Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUJ!Ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting
that Objective be revised to read, "...continue to be restored and then maintained... '']
OBJECTIVE 10.5:
For undeveloped shorelines, provide improved opportunities for recreational, educational,
scientific, and esthetic enjoyment of coastal resources by protecting beaches and dunes and
by utilizing or where necessary establishing construction standards, which will minimize the
impact of manmade structures on the beach and dune systems.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
47
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUf!Ust 11. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting
to insert, "mangroves" after "beach and dune systems" or add another Policy to address protection of
coastal mangroves.]
(Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDfion Hearings - Staff Comment - No change is
recommended, as the undeveloped coastal barriers identified b the County and Federal Coastal
Barrier Resources System also include adjacent mangrove systems. Protection is also provided by
either conservation easements or Special Treatment overlay within the County. In addition, State and
Federal permits require minimizing the impacts to mangroves.]
[Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Comment from the January 31. 2011 Adoption Hearing - Concurs
with the post EAC and CCPC Workshop and Adoption Hearings staff comments.)
OBJECTIVE 10.6:
The County shall conserve the habitats, species, natural shoreline and dune systems
contained within the County's coastal zone.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 10.6.2:
For shoreline development projects where an EIS is required, an analysis shall demonstrate
that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 10.6.2 requires shoreline projects where an EIS is required, to provide an analysis
demonstrating that the project, remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea
level. NOAA indicates that at current rates it will take 75 years to reach a 6" increase (2.02mm / year).
If the higher rates suggested by the SWFRPc Draft Climate Change report are used (2.3 mmlyear) it
will still take approximately 66 years to reach a 6 "rise (refer to link below from NOAA). These time
frames are well beyond the accepted planning horizon.
NOAA Link: http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends station.shtml?stnid=8725 I I 0
The mean sea level trend is 2.02 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.60 mmlyr
based on monthly mean sea level data from 1965 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.66 feet
in 100 years.
48
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Mean Sea level Trend - 8725110 Naples, Florida
Naples, Fl 2.02 +1-0.60 mm/yr
0.60
0.45
~ ..... fU ~"'lIi!l'"
~ SPSOhII c" mnovtd
In..tJmI
UwtrIl5'oon__
1.0.-15 'l confidtnce .!Nil
Sauce: NOAA.
O,D
0.15
.
..
! 0.00
~
-D.15
---- .---==-----
- - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---
-0.30
-0.45
-0.60
"~~~%\~,\,~,\~~"\~\,~
~ '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 ~ '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0
2009 SWFRPc Draft Climate Change Report (excerpt below):
Potential Climate Futures: This study began by examining three sea level rise "severity" scenarios:
best case, worst case, and moderate case are based upon the results of Table 4, below. This table is
based on using Tables 9-1 and 9-2 of the USEPA Report "The Probability of Sea Level Rise."
Basically, the formula is multiplying the historic sea level rise (2.3 mm/yr) in Southwest Florida
(closest point used is St. Petersburg, Fl., Table 9-2) by the future number of years from 1990 plus the
Normalized Sea Level Projections in Table 9-1. For the study the 90% probability is considered the
best case, the 50% probability the moderate case, and the 5% probability the worst case scenario.
Staff believes that current building regulations, in combination with the National Flood Insurance
Program, provide adequate protection for all residents within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
(100 year floodplain). The building code requires all buildings to be built at or above the 1 % flood
elevation set by the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) program. FIRM maps use existing sea
level and they will be updated every 5 years. The building code requires all facilities within the SFlfA
be brought into compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention ordinance with any major renovation
(improvement of greater than 51 % value of building). All buildings with federally backed mortgages
are required to obtain flood insurance.
This Policy is not relevant and should be deleted. However, one or more policies should be added to
require the County to monitor and work with federal, state and regional agencies to plan for sea level
rise in the future.
{PlanninJ! Commission (CCPC) Comment from the August 27.2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that
the Policy be retained as written to account for life expectancy of buildings of over 75 years.]
{Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the November 3. 2010 Adoption Hearing-
The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC comment from the August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop.]
{Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and Adoption HearinJ!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
EAC and CCPC recommendations.]
49
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 12.1:
The County will maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An
evacuation clearance time shall be defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate
refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e.,
winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further these objectives, for future mobile home
developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development shall include on-
site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Emergency
Management Department shall seek opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated
capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency
Management.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
While population growth has stabilized, the county is still considered to have a deficit of shelter space
that can be utilized for its population. Seasonal populations, economy and storm surge expected
without regard to category supports the need for additional shelter space.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained.
This Objective is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which were adopted into law in
2006, as follows: [Note: This is not a mandate, rather an option should the County desire to increase
residential density within the CI-ffiA through a GMP A.]
163.3178(9)(b) Requires the addition of a new section establishing a level of service for out-
of-county hurricane evacuation of no greater than 16 hours for a category 5 storm for any local
government that wishes to follow the process in s.163.3178(9)(a) but has not established such
a level of service by July 1,2008. Ch. 2006-68, LOF.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 12.1.1:
Collier County will develop and maintain a comprehensive public awareness program. The
program will be publicized prior to May 30th of each year. Evacuation zones, public shelters
and evacuation routes shall be printed in each local newspaper, displayed on the Collier
County Emergency Management website, and the availability of this information will be
discussed on local television newscasts. This information shall also be made readily available
to all hoteUmotel guests.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 12.1.1 states that a comprehensive awareness program will be developed and publicized prior to
May 30th of each year. Evacuation zones and routings will be printed in each local newspaper. This
information will be made readily available to all hotel/motel guests and other alternative media forums.
The County cannot ensure that this information gets printed in each publication.
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to remove
the phrase, "printed in" and replace with "provided to."
Policy 12.1.3:
The County shall continue to identify and maintain shelter space for 32,000 persons by 2006
and 45,000 by 2010. Shelter space capacity will be determined at the rate of 20 square feet per
person.
50
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 12.1.3 requires that the County continue to identify shelter space that complies with Red Cross
standards for 32,000 persons by 2006 and 45,000 persons by 2010. Shelter space will be determined at
the rate of 20 square feet per person. Collier County recommends that these dates and numbers be
revised based upon the figures computed from the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's
Hurricane Evacuation Study Update.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
current shelter space figures of 32,000 persons by 2012 and 45,000 persons by 2015.
Policy 12.1.5:
On-site shelters within mobile home parks or mobile home subdivisions shall be elevated to a
minimum height equal to or above the worst case Category 3 hurricane flooding level, based
upon the most current National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's storm surge
model, known as Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH). The wind load
criteria for buildings and structures designated as "essential facilities" in the latest Florida
Building Code, shall guide the design and construction of the required shelters. Shelters shall
be constructed with emergency electrical. power and potable water supplies; shall provide
glass protection by shutters or other approved material/device; and shall provide for
ventilation, sanitary facilities and first aid equipment. A telephone, automatic external
defibrillator (AED) and battery-operated radio are also required within the shelter.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the last sentence should be amended
to read, "battery operated radio with NOAA weather S.A.M.E. (Specific Area Message Encoded)
capability. "
Policy 12.1.7:
The County shall update the hurricane evacuation portion of the Collier County
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan prior to June 1st of each year by integrating all
appropriate regional and State emergency plans in the identification of emergency evacuation
routes.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained.
{Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment tram the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting to
add the requirement to "coordinate with municipalities. "J
[Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdODtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the
CCPC recommendation.]
Policy 12.1.9:
Collier County shall annually update its approved Hazard Mitigation Plan, formerly known as
the "Local Hazard Mitigation Strategy" through the identification of new or ongoing local
hazard mitigation projects and appropriate funding sources for such projects.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant, but should be revised to read, "Collier County through its Local
Mitigation Working Group shall annually update its approved Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS),
51
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
through the identification and review of new or ongoing local hazard mitigation projects including,
appropriate funding sources for such projects."
Policy 12.1.11 :
The County will continue to coordinate with Collier County Public Schools to ensure that all
new public schools outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area are designed and constructed to
meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria, as contained in "State Requirements for Educational
Facilities" (1999).
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the referenced date should be revised
to reflect the year 2007.
Policy 12.1.12:
The County will continue to work with the Board of Regents of the State University System to
ensure that all new facilities in the State University System that are located outside of the
Coastal High Hazard Area are designed and constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design
Criteria, as contained in "State Requirements for Educational Facilities" (1999) and the Florida
Building Code.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the referenced date should be revised
to reflect the year 2007.
Policy 12.1.13:
The County will continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through
mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and
Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre-disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding,
and from funds identified in the State's annual shelter deficit studies.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, cost-sharing and other requirements
sometimes are not acceptable to the County. The Policy should be revised to delete the word "from"
after the word "and"; and, add the phrase, "...as funding requirements permit." at the end of the
paragraph.
Policy 12.1.14:
Prior to adoption of the 2007 Annual Update and Inventory Report (A.U.I.R.), Collier County
shall evaluate whether to include hurricane shelters in the 5-year schedule of Capital
Improvements.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, as the Board of County Commissioners does
not support the inclusion of hurricane shelters within the 5-year schedule of Capital Improvements.
Policy 12.1.15:
All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed for more than 15 clients
will have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site. The core area will be constructed to
meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that is required for new public schools and public
community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 1999).
Additionally this area shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up
generator for a period of no less than 48 hours.
52
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to make
consistent with current State and Local guidelines: delete the phrase, "...for more than 15 clients";
delete "48 hours" and replace with "72" hours; and revise the date reference to reflect "2007."
Policy 12.1.17:
Collier County is currently conducting a hurricane evacuation re-study. If warranted by the
results of these studies, further restriction on development may be proposed.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, for clarity and accuracy, the County
recommends revising the Policy to read, "Hurricane Evacuation Studies for Collier County are
periodically conducted by the State of Florida and Federal Authorities. If warranted by the results of
these studies, further restriction on development may be proposed."
OBJECTIVE 12.2:
The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development
activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of
life, property, and re-building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and
technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not limited to:
a. Construction above the flood plain;
b. maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation;
c. installation of on-site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection
points;
d. beach and dune restoration, re-nourishment, or emergency protective actions to minimize
the loss of structures from future events;
e. emergency road repairs;
f. repair and/or replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls,
etc.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 12.2.5:
The County shall consider the Coastal High Hazard Area as a geographical area lying within
the Category 1 storm surge zone as presently defined in the 2001 Southwest Florida Regional
Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or
evacuation planning studies coordinated by the Collier County Emergency Management
Department and approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 12.2.5 requires the County to consider the coastal high-hazard area as that area lying within the
Category 1 evacuation zone as defined in the 200 I Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
Hurricane Evacuation Study.
It should be noted that the draft 2011 Evacuation Study has been completed, but is still under review
by staff and the State.
53
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
This Policy is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which were adopted into law in
2006, as follows:
163.3178(2)(h) Requires a change to the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)
to be defined as the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established
by the SLOSH model. ch. 2006-68, LOF.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the defInition of the CHHA should be
revised consistent with 2006 legislative changes.
OBJECTIVE 12.3:
The County shall develop and maintain a task force that will plan and guide a unified County
response to post-hurricane disasters.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 12.3.2:
After a hurricane that necessitated an evacuation, the Board of County Commissioners shall
meet to hear preliminary damage assessments. This will be done prior to re-entry of the
population. At that time, the Commission will activate the recovery task force and consider a
temporary moratorium on building activities not necessary for the public health, safety and
welfare.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 12.3.2 states that, after a hurricane that necessitated an evacuation, the Board of County
Commissioners will meet to hear preliminary damage assessments. This will be done prior to re-entry
of the population. At that time, the Commission will activate the recovery task force and consider a
temporary moratorium on building activities not necessary for the public health, safety and welfare.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to remove
the second sentence, and change "will" to "may" in the last sentence.
Policy 12.3.3:
The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff of Collier County, the Community
Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator, the Comprehensive
Planning Director, the Zoning and Land Development Review Director, the Emergency
Management Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners.
The Board should also include representatives from municipalities within Collier County that
have received damage from the storm to become members of the Recovery Task Force.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Policy 12.3.3 recommends that the recovery task force will include local law enforcement authorities,
the Community Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning and Zoning
Director, Emergency Management Director and other members as directed by the Board of County
Commissioners. Representatives from municipalities receiving damage from the storm should also be
members of the recovery task force.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect
current departmental references.
54
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 12.4:
The County shall make every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness
requirements of people with special needs such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and
those requiring transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide
emergency, such as a hurricane or other large-scale disaster, the County Emergency
Management Department shall open and operate one or more refuges for persons listed on the
County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical and support equipment at such
refuges will include, but not necessarily be limited to, respirators, oxygen tanks, first aid
equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised as
follows: delete, "people with special needs" and replace with "Persons with Special Needs (PSN)"
within the first sentence; delete". . . the County Emergency Management Department shall..." and
replace with "... the County Emergency Management Department in coordination with the Collier
County Health Department and other officials shall..."
55
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper
formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below.
Goal: General statement that defmes what the Element will
ultimately achieve.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal;
describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s).
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to
achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s).
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department
name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective
and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical
changes.
Objective 1
Minor revisions to include certain key agencies.
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 2.1
Revision to reflect the Department name change.
Revision to reflect the Department name change.
Inclusion of the word "appropriate" so that agreements are not limited to
agencies within Collier County.
Policy 2.6
Policy 2.7
Policy 2.8
Minor text revisions to update dates.
Minor text revisions to update dates and requirements.
Revision to correct SFWMD name.
Policy 2.9
Minor text revisions to include a comma and delete specific Florida Statute
sub-section.
1
Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE- Summary
Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE
Introduction and Background
The Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) is the portion of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP) that contains the County's Goal, Objectives and Policies with regard to
relations between the County and non-County governmental entities (as well as quasi-
governmental entities, including utility companies). The ICE contains a single Goal, which states
the primary purpose of this Element.
A list of interlocal agreements is provided at the conclusion of the ICE Objective and Policy
analysis.
Objectives Analysis:
The ICE Goal reads as follows:
"PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND THE USE
OF ANY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION MECHANISMS WITH
BROW ARD, DADE, HENDRY, LEE AND MONROE COUNTIES, CITIES OF
EVERGLADES AND NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, SOUTHWEST
FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, AND ANY OTHER LOCAL, STATE,
OR FEDERAL AGENCY OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND UTILITY
COMPANIES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO FLORIDA POWER AND tiGHT,
LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, SPRINTIUNITED TELEPHONE,
IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, PELICAN BAY SERVICE DIVISION
(MSTU), FLORIDA WATER SERVICES, FLORIDA CITIES WATER COMPANY,
MEDIA ONE, AND CABLEVISION INDUSTRIES THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY
COLLIER COUNTY'S LAND, ROAD OR FACILITY PLANNING TO RESOLVE
DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATmLE AND COORDINATED PLANS."
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends generalizing names when
possible. For example:
COLLIER COUNTY WILL MAINTAIN OR ENHANCE TIlE LEVEL OF COORDINATION
AND COOPERATION AMONG TIlE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS, AUTIlORITIES AND
AGENCIES MAKING DECISIONS AFFECTING NATURAL RESOURCES, HOUSING,
HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, PUBLIC FACILITIES. AND PUBLIC
SERVICES WITHIN AND AROUND COLLIER COUNTY, TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES
AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATffiLE AND COORDINATED PLANS.
OB.JECTIVE 1:
Collier County (County) shall continue to establish and maintain intergovernmental
communication and level of service coordination mechanisms to be used by the County,
Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, the City of Naples, and the City of Bonita
Springs, adjacent Lee County, Hendry County, Broward County, Dade County, Monroe
County, the District School Board of Collier County School Board, the State of Florida,
and any other entity that provides a service but may not have land use authority.
1
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the insertion of the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, and South
Florida Water Management District. Including these agencies will ensure coordination of key
policies that relate to water supply planning and watershed management plans.
Policy 1.2: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shall be the
designated liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan
amendments under review by the County, which have the potential to affect any of the
entities listed in Objective 1.
PolieV' Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends that this Policy be updated to reflect
that the former Comprehensive Planning Department is now the Comprehensive Planning
Section.
Policy 1.2 requires the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department to be the designated
liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan amendments by the
County which affect any of the entities listed in Objective 1.1.
Policy 1.3: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shall continue to
prepare and review the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as an annual level of
service monitoring report for the capital facilities included within the Growth Management
Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the necessary
information to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: The County recommends that this Policy be updated to reflect
that the Comprehensive Planning Department recently became the Comprehensive Planning
Section.
Policy 1.3 requires the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department to prepare and
review an annual level of service monitoring report for the facilities included within the Growth
Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the
information in order to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards. This task is
incorporated into the County's Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) for the County's
capital facilities.
OBJECTIVE 2: The County shall coordinate its land use planning strategy, including an
assessment of proposed development, with that of other governmental and private entities.
Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text remains as written.
With regard to other governmental and non-governmental entities, as well as the general public,
the County takes due care that all matters coming before the Board of County Commissioners
with regard to land use changes are properly noticed and advertised, and that there is a public
opportunity for all interested parties to present comments and recommendations to the
Commission. Additionally, Collier County's proposed GMP amendments and Land
Development Code (LDC) changes are either available online, in other electronic version, or as
2
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
printed documents. In addition, all land use-related documents are available to anyone upon
request for a minimal copying fee.
Policy 2.1: Collier County will continue to identify, develop, and pursue areas where
intergovernmental land use planning and level of service agreements are needed between
the County and respective governmental or private entities.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends minor text change.
Agreements should not be limited to governments and entities within Collier County. Collier
County recommends expanding to "appropriate" governmental or private entities.
Policy 2.6: The County shall continue to coordinate with The District School Board of
Collier County for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections,
the public school site selection for new public educational and ancillary facilities, and the
location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency, to support existing and
proposed public educational facilities in accordance with the general Interlocal Agreement,
adopted on May 15,2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the
Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an
effective date of December 2008, and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement
adopted on May 15,2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the
Board of County Commissioners.
Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text be revised to reflect new
dates or generalize text so that dates are not specified.
Public Comment from 3-15-10 EAR Public Meetin2: Better coordination between School
Board (sitting) and County Government (locate schools where infrastructure is available or
planned).
Policy 2.6 requires that the County coordinate with the Collier County School Board on the site
selection for new public educational plants and ancillary plants and the provision of
infrastructure, particularly roads, to support existing and proposed public educational plants and
ancillary plants in accordance with the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in accordance with
Sections 163 .3177( 6)(h) and 163.31777, Florida Statutes, on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County
School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. This policy should
be revised to remove dates and or revise dates. As an alternative, text should be revised so that
specific dates of agreements are not specified.
Policy 2.7: Collier County hereby adopts, as part of this Intergovernmental Coordination
Element, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Rule 291-7, Florida
Administrative Code, dated April 1994, which establishes a voluntary regional dispute
process to reconcile differences on planning, growth management, and other issues among
local governments, regional agencies and private interests.
Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text be revised to reflect new
dates and requirements.
3
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Policy 2.7 incorporates into the Growth Management Plan, by reference, the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council's (SWFRPC's) Dispute Resolution, Rule 291-7, dated April 1994.
This policy should be revise to include portions of Rule 291-7 have been updated since 1994 and
date will change per new SB360-2009 requirement. Collier County recommends amending
references to date or update dates, and to include new requirement for mandatory mediation
(SB360-2009, amending ~186.509).
Policy 2.8: The County shall coordinate with the South Water Management District and
other regulatory agencies in implementing the Growth Management Plan.
PolicY Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends correcting SFWMD name.
Policy 2.8 requires the County to coordinates with the South Water Management District and
other regulatory agencies. This is an on-ongoing task. Collier County recommends including
"Florida" to correct the name of the cited agency.
Policy 2.9: The County shall continue to coordinate with The District School Board of
Collier County for the regulatory review of residential development for school
concurrency, in accordance with Section 163.3180(13) Florida Statutes.
PolicY Achievement AnalYsis: Collier County recommends minor text revisions.
Policy 2.9 requires the County to coordinates with Tbe District School Board of Collier County
in regard to the review of residential development for school concurrency. This is an on-ongoing
task. Collier County recommends including a comma that is missing prior to Florida Statutes,
and referring to Section 163.3180 only.
OBJECTIVE 3: Collier County shall develop procedures to identify and implement joint
planning areas for the purposes of municipal annexation, municipal incorporation and
joint infrastructure service areas.
Obiective Achievement AnalYsis: Collier County recommends the text remains as written.
Section 9J-5.015 (3) (c) 4., Florida Administrative Code, requires the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element (ICE) to: "Provide procedures to identify and implement joint planning
areas for the purposes of annexation, municipal incorporation and joint infrastructure service
areas." This is the only provision within the State's ICE Rule that is related to annexation. This
is an on-going task.
The chart on the foUowing pages documents the interlocal agreements entered into by the
County since the 2004 EAR.
4
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
... ...
c c ...
CD CD CD
E E ..a
::s ::s E
u ... ::s
o 1;; z
co!:
...
CD
..a
E
::s
z
...
U
fa
...
...
c
o
u
CD
>
"g ~
CD fa
:t:c
W
...
o c
... CD
lG E
'f ~
fa ...
a. bO
c:t
...
_ c:
o CD
CD E
E CD
fa (II
z to
c:t
~
o
bO
(II
...
fa
U
n;
C
o
:e
c
::s
LL
~
-.:;
c:
w
bO
C
-.:;
III
::i
... ... .
c:.Ea::
E ~ ~
CD..aW
~ E ....
bO::S....
c:tz2
U)
IJ")
N
....
,...
C'l
m
U)
a
a
N
-
,...
....
-
a
....
~
~.~ ~
I: ... I:
:J tl 5
80u
.~ g .~
ooCo
u~u
z
o
8~i
::>>.g Q)
C Q) Q)
LI.Ie~
>- "0
..... Q)
I: V>....
:J V> III
o Q)Qj
U "0 ... ...
Q) Q) "0 V>
OCa::...."O....
IIl....CO'OIIl~
+::0V)Q)0a.
a3;'O~;E
.....Q)....Q)I:
g,iil~~1Il
I: (jj a..o 0
... V> III 0
~tl~a3-5
Q)ltlO<:OV')
ua.-....Q)
~EgQ)-S
V> .- oC ~ ....
v> I: u 1100
~.QV')ltll:
::g iil ~ tJ .Q
co -e ~ -i:: 1:)
..... 0 I: tl :J
.~ ~ Q) 0 t:
~I:E"OI:
.~ltlQ)I:O
o ~ W ltl U
....
u
.;::
....
V>
C .~
(5 ~
001:
oC U :J
u _ 0
V') 0 U
o
U.J
a
0'\
IJ")
....
,...
a
<:t
,...
a
a
N
U5-
....
";iO-
"0
.... I:
o ltl
tJ~~
.;:: I: I:
tl :J :J
088
g .~ .~
oC
U
V')
00
uu
....
I:
ltl Q)
~ E
L: Q)
Q) ~
..... 110
I: et
I:
o
+::
ltl
-e
o
a.
V>
I:
ltl
...
.....
.i J
~i
~ 1:
I:
o
.... -
>.... ~.!!!
.0 0 .s 0
~ ... .~ E
I:~~Q)
~o-g~
Q) U ltl V>
~~"E ~
'- ~ cu ~
a...... > ~
E ltl ~ Q)
co :J >
I: I: 0 Q)
.Q 110 co ~
iil .Vi ro ~ 0
~:E'~oo
a.ltlE~-5
~~Q)Q)V')
ltl ltl ~ "E ~
~~~~~
5 .S; (jj "0 E
oeQ)~~
ua.>c:::U.J
m
00
IJ")
....
,...
a
<:t
f"-
a
a
N
-
....
....
-
C'l
"0
- I:
o ltl
tJ~~
.;:: I: I:
tl :J :J
088
o
o
oC
U
V')
... ...
.!!! .!!!
00
uu
.....
_ I:
ltl Q)
~ E
L: Q)
Q) ~
..... 110
I: et
V> >-
ltl ...
V> ltl
-0 e
ltl 0 ~' Q)
+:: oC > E
~~~Q)
'0 0 e W
c.......Q)"O
.!:: ~ E ~
~m~(9
(jj (jj ">-
U ... 2!: ~
V') ~ to ......
V> U u I:
Q) ltl .... Q)
... c...u E
~.s ~~
o I: V> U.J
...., 0 1.1')""'--,
.... +:: a:: > V>
I: CllCO"'1:
Q)E -e V') ~ ltl
0_ 1:0
Q)~OQ)Q)
~ ltll: t:: Q)E .....
~~ ~w~
.....
u
.;::
.....
V>
is .~
(5 ~
001:
oC U :J
u _ 0
V') 0 U
o
U.J
f"-
C'l
N
N
00
<:t
m
<:t
a
a
N
-
....
N
-
C'l
"0
I:
~~
o I:
u :J
... 0
ltl U
Z ~ (jj
0'0=
!;i~8
LL10~
a::
U
LLI
a::
.....
olJ Cll ~
V) U E
~ 0
a::L:~
c:t ~ ~
a. I: et
Q)
u
I:
ltl
I:
Q)
.....
I:
'n;
~
"0
I:
Cll
.....
I:
Q) Q)
E .5
-f;i ...
.;:: Q)
:J V')
o I:
I: 0
Q)+::
c::: Cll
.r; .~
u:..c
ltl tIl
Q) ....
co V')
o
u
....
ltl
~
'0-0
~~
o~
c:::
0..
N
N
00
,...
....
IJ")
m
<:t
a
a
N
~
N
-
0'\
~
V> >
Q) .....
0.5
ltl 0
zu
- ...
o Q)
~=
._ 0
uu
....
I:
tIl Q)
~ E
L: Q)
Q) ~
.... 110
I: <(
Q)
u
I:
ltl
I:
Q)
.....
I:
.;0
~
'0
I:
tIl
....
I:
Q) Q)
E .5
-f;i ....
".:: OJ
:J V')
o I:
I: 0
Q) '';:;
c::: ltl
.c .~
u:..c
tIl ltl
Q) ....
CCV')
V>
~
0..
ltl
Z
....
o
>
.....
o
c:::
0..
....
N
00
f"-
..-l
IJ")
m
<:t
a
a
N
U5-
....
-
..-l
..-l
"0
I:
~ ~
o I:
u :J
.... 0
tIlU
~ ....
- .!!!
0=
>0
.....u
o~
.....
I:
ltl Q)
~ E
L: Q)
Q) ~
..... 110
I: et
I:
V>
Q)
oC
U
tIl
Q)
co
Q)
oC
....
....
o
110
I:
'0"0
ltl I:
.... Cll
(9~
oC
u 0
ltl U
Q) ....
co tIl
-~
0_
I: 0
.Q >
V> .....
'S; 0
o Q)
...oc
0.. .....
o
u
....
ltl
~
....
0-0
> I:
..... tIl
Oe;;
c:::
0..
m
00
N
0'\
N
<:t
m
<:t
a
a
N
-
IJ")
N
-
-=r
~
V> >
Q) .....
0.3
ltl 0
ZU
- ....
o Q)
>=
;!:: 0
UU
;;b
IJ")
C'l
m
m
-=r
a
a
N
-
..-l
..-l
-
IJ")
~
V> >
Q) e
0.. :J
tIl 0
zu
- ...
o Q)
>=
.~ 0
uu
..... .....
I: I:
ltl Q) ltl Q)
~ E ~ E
L: Q) L: Q)
Q) ~ Q) ~
..... 110 ..... 110
I: <( I: et
V'I
Cll
Q)
...
et
oC
U
V> tIl
.;:: Q)
... co
o _
Z 0
Q) I:
oC 0 V>
...., :0 Q)
'- ctJ .~
c.E: to- V')
Q)'" ~110
u Q) 0 .s
1:..... .:!t!
~ a3 ~ ~
V> U Q) a..
'Vi > u "0
~.~ ~ ~
1103 I: tIl
I:E~Qj
'0 1:'"
I: E .;0 "0
~8~~
V>
~
a.
ltl
Z
-
o
>
.....
o
c:::
0..
V>
Q)
a.
Cll
Z
"-
o
>
.....
o
c:::
0..
.....
U
.;::
.....
V'I
o __'~
(5 ~
001:
oC U :J
u _ 0
V) 0 U
o
U.J
... ...
c C a.. 1.0
CUCUCU....
E E .Q lI'l
~ ~ E v
u ::: ~ ~
o VI z v
c.E
a..
CU
.Q
E
~
Z
ti
ftJ
a..
...
C
o
u
CU
>
'+0 CU
u 1;;
~c
LLl
...
o c
... CU
; E
~ ~
ftJ a..
~~
...
a ;
cu E
E cu
ftJ cu
Z ~
<(
~
o
:
...
ftJ
U
ftJ
C
o
:e
c
~
u.
?:
+i
c
LLl
QO
C
+i
VI
::i
... a.. .
c,EQ:
CU ... <i.
E cu u.i
CU.Q
f E :::
QO~o
<(zr..ag:
r::
o
~
ctl
...
r::
Q)
.;::
o
VI
'C
Q)
t Ql
::s.s::.
... u
ctl co
Q) Q)
VllXl
~~
~o
Ql'O
r:: r::
Q) co
u ~
::s r::
" ::s
Q) 0
a:u
~ r::
VI
Q)
Ii
co
Z
'0
>
...
o
,.....
o
o
N
-
,.....
N
-
m
021 021
VI>VI>
Q)1:~1:
Ii::sa.::s
co 0 co 0
ZUZU
,...... '- '+- '-
o Q) 0 Q)
>= >=
.'!: 0 .'!: 0
UUUU
... .....
ro~Cii~
g E g E
-;:: Q) -;:: Q)
Q) ~ Q) ~
... 1lO'" 1lO
r:: <( r:: <(
"
r::
co
..0
::s
o
...::t::
Q) 0
~~
co
... co
~ 3:
E Q)
Q).s::.
Q) ...
iio .s
<( Q)
>0
~ :I:
" ....
r:: 0
::s r::
o 0
lXl~
Q) co
u x
.~ ~
Q) r::
V) co
VI
Q)
Ii
co
Z
....
o
>
...
o
a:
0..
0'1
V
m
,.....
lI'l
....
V
00
o
o
N
-
lI'l
N
-
V
Q)
... >
co .....
r:: Q)
" a.
... 0
o ...
8 a.
0"
... ~
u VI
r:: 1:
..0' Q)
::s"
o Ql
::t:: ...
o .8
~ Q)
ctl U
~ .~
'u Q)
r:: VI
'0 ~
0..'Cr::
~ .S: :c
o e .'!:
a: a. 3:
,,~
Q)...'O
1U .... r::
... 0 co
0= U')
a. co Q)
... >'-
8 0 ~
c .~ u
.c ~ .E
::s"
E r::
o co
... Q)
.... VI
VI ::s
1: .8
~ >
.- ...
VI r::
Q) ::s
... 0
3: U
~~
o 0
I-U
VI
Q)
Ii
co
Z
....
o
>
...
o
a:
0..
o
lI'l
00
lI'l
m
N
V
00
o
o
N
~
....
-
....
....
021
VI >
~ 1:
a. ::s
co 0
ZU
.... ...
o Q)
>=
.'!: 0
UU
.....
_ r::
co Q)
g E
-;:: Q)
Q) ~
..... 1lO
r:: <(
VI
co
VI
'Vi
co
..0
Q)
E
co
VI
Q)
.s::.
...
r::
co 0
6 VI'
'';:; E
co ~
Q) 1lO
b e
& ~~
~' ~ C
... 0 _
co .- .,[
0.. 1U ..
_VI ~ 4-
> u C
.'!: Q) =
Ua:li
,.....
N
1.0
m
0'1
N
V
0'1
o
o
N
-
V
....
-
v
'0
r::
co
]2i?;
o r::
u ::s
... 0
co U
:iE Q)
'0=
i?;8
0021
.....
r::
co Q)
g E
-;:: Q)
Q) ~
... 1lO
r:: <(
..... .s::. 0
r:: " u u
Q) r:: co ... Q)
E~Q)coVl
~. ..0 ~ Q)
Q)-Q)"::.s::.
~@"O~
co ro .~ >-E
:iE :iE 5. <5 :iE
Q) .... = Q) N
r:: 0 ro .s::. U
o >.s::.... >
N.....VI.s::.ro
ro 0 :iE .~ a.
"'Q)N.s::.O
~ -:5 U 3: ...
8 " 1U .is al
r::.s::._Q)
i?; ro ... Q) ...
r:: ... " u 1lO
::s r:: Q) r:: ro
o Q) Q) co VI
U E ... r:: co
......~Q).s::.
~~ 1:"
og.~.ffi~
UCl.s::.EVI
o
u
...
co
:iE
....
0"
> r::
... ro
0-';;
a:
0..
,.....
N
....
lI'l
0'1
N
V
0'1
o
o
N
-
N
.-t
-
lI'l
>021 >
... Q) ...
r:: u r::
5 :E 5
uOu
.~ ~ ~
o~o
uV)u
...
_ r::
ro Q)
.Q ~
.... Q)
Q) ....
... 1lO
r:: <(
Q) .8
1: .s ... VI
E ~ 5.*
Q):iElI::....
1lO VI ro Q)
~ot;~
co V) 1lO-
:iE~r::ro
:~ ;g
~ -g '0 .-
Oro:iE~
N"N....
roQ)UO
t; t; Q) 1lO
co Q) ..:.:: r::
8 g ~'s
~ ~ +-'Q) 'c
r:: r:: Q) 0
::s Q) ... E
Ql~.s?ift
.~ .~ ~ ~ .g
...0g.:E5
~UClOu
>
..... Q)
r:: u
::Slo:;
0....
uO
~~
o~
UV)
a:
0..
"
Q)
Q) -
... .-t
1lO-..:.::
ro Q) ...
o r:: ro
.!!!oo..
ro Q) "
~ .~ ~
.s::.l::=c
~ 0 0
Q) 0
{j .s ~
. .... ...
> co co
1::iEa.
::s _VI "Vi
OOQi
U V) VI
Q) U VI
-:5 U ~
..... Q) .....
::s .s::. r::
o ..... Q)
t70 3: ~
::S..Q
e ro E
.s::. 0 Q)
..... ... a.
m
m
00
1.0
o
m
v
0'1
o
o
N
-
C'l
-
1.0
VI
Q)
'0
co
In .~
Q)-
> 0
UJU>
'00211:
> >::s
.~ .'!: 0
UUU
.....
r::
co Q)
g E
-;:: Q)
Q) ~
..... 1lO
r:: <(
0"
... 0
Q) Q)
U ...J
r:: u
co:iE
t; 0
-Vi ......
VI VI
co 1:
1lO Q)
.s E 0'1
" Q)_O
r:: > 00
.2eo
o a. >-
o E u..
~ ....
o....-E
I.O-E..:.::
Vl- > ...
" .~ ~
~ U >
o Ql .~
a." r::
a. co ::s
coliOE
U .... E
U ~ 0
lXlUJU
>
.....
o
VI
Q)
"
.... ro
oliO
> ....
.'!: ~
UUJ
a:
0..
... ...
cc:..oo
CII CP CP 00
E E .a N
:J :J Eoo
u":Jen
o ~ Z ~
Co!:
...
CP
.a
E
:J
Z
1:;
nJ
..
...
C
o
u
CP
>
~ CP
u ...
cp nJ
=c
W
...
o C
... cp
~ E
~ t
nJ ...
a..~
...
_ C
o cp
cp E
E cp
nJ ~
Z~
~
o
bll
cp
...
nJ
U
nJ
C
o
~
C
:J
U.
l:
~
c
W
tlO
C
~
lit
::;
... .. .
coEa::
cp ... <i.
E cp W
CP.a
~ E ~
bO:J~
<(z2a::
c..
o
.-f
o
N
......
o
.-f
......
en
'U
C
III
~~
o 5
u 0
~ U
~ ~
0=
>- 0
...u
acCS
...
C
III Ql
g E
;:: Ql
Ql e
... till
C <(
'U
C
III
U
.;:
...
'"
o
.r:.
u
III
Ql
co ...
>-.E
III _
;: U
III 0
Ql :::I
~<(
::I:.r:.
..... u
o III
Ql Ql
"'co
o >-
0. III
... ;:
:J III
0. Ql
"''U
o .-
u.::I:
o
u
...
III
~
.....0 'U
C
~..!!!
a '"
.....
o
C
o
-.;:;
u
Ql
'"
.r:.
u
III
Ql
co
>-
III
;:
III
Ql
~
::I:
E~
o ...
e .!:: 'U
... C
'" '" III
!!l.~]i
_!:! 'tj 8
:0 :J ...
~ ~ ctJ
Q.U'l:2:
-
o
Co
o ...
"'^ ....,
'S 5
eu
0. C
o
-Vi
o
...
UJ
'U
C
III
'<t
\0
0)
LI'l
co
......
en
en -
.-f ::6
~ >- 0. Ql
g 1:: E ~
N:J'UCU
:;a:OQlC
QlU"':O
u ... III ...
c~:EO
~ooal
'OU~u.
... 0
o U
LI'l
o
o
N
......
0)
N
......
.-f
.-f
'"
Ql
'U
ro
~~
Ql-
> 0
UJu
'OcCS~
II) >->-:J
w _-: .-: 0
t= U U U
::i
U
<( -
u. C
u 13 Ql
::i 0 E
co ;:: al
::) 2 ...
a..E~
'"
Ql
u
C
III III
'U .s:
Ql'U
'U ...
Ql 0
~ Ql
Ql~
0.....
~ U '"
'U ~.!!!
; E .-:
'U .0:; -u
~~[E
ro ... u
Ql ~::
o.Ql.o
Ql '" :::J
... _ c..
Ql 0 0
~ \,.. ......
ro Ql 'U
C .0 Ql
:0 E t;
o2~
>-
....
a
<II
Ql
'U
.... ro
obil
>- ...
.-: ~
UUJ
u..
c..
o
'<t
en
......
'<t
en
'<t
0)
o
o
N
0\
N
......
0)
cCS
<II >-
~1::
0. :J
~8
- ...
o Ql
t="=
a:: __ 0
w U U
~
3:
w 1::
..... n; Ql
co u E
<( .g Ql
""0 Ql e
... tlO
a.. C <(
>- ~ d
....0...0 ...
OQl-qn;Ql
- ... 0 LI'l C ....
tIIlQlCNOro
C .r:. 0 J~ ':>
:0 3: ~ ~r -Vi >
c>-....-g~~
:JIllOQl-_
....coo.ue_
-gEIll~.e~
>..!!!-g 0 u'U
eU:J-:::Jc
0.<5,,;c;-g8
:;-__coo
u>-'U>-u....
u'g al'g= c:-
eo _ .... _ 3: ~
~~~~t="~>-
C .-: <II .-: C u 'U
:In;IllIll:JQl:J
o:J.r:.:Joc_
uC">-C"uv>'"
..... .... s...QJ>
Q) '- ..- I.... QJ U __-:
:: Ql U ~ -- .S
o t; Ql III 0 ... ~
u3:.s3:u~C"
'"
Ql
a.
III
z
....
o
>-
-
u
3:
Q.
......
.-f
o
o
N
.-f
en
en
o
o
N
......
00
N
......
.-f
Ql ...
e a .~
u:: en 0
<IIa::u
-acCScCS
III -
Z e
- ....
<II C
III 0
~ UJ U
W
U.
<( -
II) C
u 13 Ql
::i 0 E
co ;:: al
::) 2 ...
a.. C ~
tit="
-;: C
t: :J
08
....
'0 -~
"'0
~ U
o C
e-:c
:J .-:
0. ;:
.... C
.E .Q
~1::
.;: ~
~ e
'5 0.
~ -~
0-
Ql OIl
<II .S: >-
,,- u ...
~ -s C
Ql ... :J
X Ql 0
UJ<IIU
-
cCS u
.;:
-
<II
o
C1I
:J
U
<II
Ql
a::
Ql'" 0
- ...
:;-1::
28
~ ~
III ._
UJ U.
U'l
c..
LI'l
o
\0
\0
LI'l
co
en
LI'l
o
o
N
......
en
.-f
......
N
.-f
'U
c
III
]icCS
:::10
Ql .::;
.... c
0. 0
>-u
U Ql
till ....
iiiu:
-
C
III Ql
g E
;:: Ql
Ql e
- tlO
c <(
cCS
ti >-
";: ......
_ C
'" :J
08
Ql ....
a .!!!
~o
a::u
...'
Ql
3: Ql
o U <II
0.:: -u
>-.0 ~
c :J X
III 0. Ql
- Ql ...
o.r:..r:.
Ql ~ -~
-19 .!:! E
... .r:. C
~ 3: 'w
~t="~
c .;: .r:.
:Q, ,g -g
Ql .... >
.r:. :J 0
.... III >
~ <5 _S: >-
.1;: ~ ~ 2
o Ql .u ~
.r:.==CIll
'5 'E: ~ 0.
<(0.1ll~
'"
<II Ql
Ql ....
.... .-
c..u.
>-'U
U c
tlO III
iiiVi
U'l
c..
t)
.;:
-
'"
cCSo
o Ql
... :J
- U
C <II
o Ql
ua::
+' ...
c c
CP CP
E E
:J :J
u ...
o t;
C.E
...
CP
,J:2
E
:s
z
1:;
ra
...
...
c
o
u
CP
>
:e S
cp ra
:r:c
W
...
o c
... cp
:G E
:e ~
ra ...
Q. tlD
<(
...
_ c
o cp
cp E
E cp
ra cp
z~
~
o
tlD
cp
...
ra
U
ra
c
o
+i
u
c
:s
u.
~
+i
c
LLI
tlD
C
+0
ell
::i
... ....
C,2al:
E ~ ~
Cp,J:2W
e E .-f
tlD :J .-f
<[z~V'l
a...
"'L/')
~~
EOCI
:s~
zm
\0
e
e
N
~
N
-
N
'0
C
ro
]!~
o C
U ;:,
.... 0
roU
::;E (jj
15=
~8
u~
....
C
ro Q)
:5 E
L: Q)
Q) ~
.... tl.O
C <(
C
Q)
t::
'':: ..c
~ ....
.~ ~.~
.... E :e
Q) Q) -
+-' ~:c
cQ) C 'Vi
ro C
S E 8-
>-.... VI
.... 0 Q)
C '+- ....
;:, ....
o C
U Q)
Q) E
..c Q)
.... Q)
VI ....
Q) tl.O
N ro
0;::
o ro
..c ;:,
.... ....
;:, ;:,
<( E
o
u
....
ro
::;E
'+-0 '0
c:
>- ro
5-v;
\0
e
e
N
-
L/')
N
-
.....
oCl
VI >-
Q) 1::
c. ;:,
ro 0
ZU
'+- ....
o Q)
>=
o'!: 0
UU
....
C
ro Q)
:5 E
L: Q)
Q) ~
..... tl.O
C <(
VI
Q)
'0 u
S;....Q) rolijQ)Q)
.:.... '0.50 u .s
C.... Q) '0 0>
Q)O '00....
EVI ~Q)J:
Q)ro Qj~ro
till C ~ u
roc::> c. ._
:> ;:,tJ'O
ro 0 VI ro
E ~ '0 C.
Q), lij o~
..c '0 '0 Q)
..... C Q)....
-g 0 ~ =!!: ro ~
~:'O2:~~
1::Q)~~~~
Q)~ C Q)Q)'+-
EQ)~roctuo
bJ) .0 ~ ~ ~ a>
C .- 1:: 5.S: .0
~ 5 "iii 0 '0 E
:aEE~o~
VI
Q)
Q.
ro
Z
'+-
o
>
....
u
V'l
a...
m
qo
N
0'1
.....
OCI
m
m ....
M ~
~ >c.Q)
e 1:: E g
a;:, ro
NO'OC
#Q) U 2l :c
.... ro ....
g~~o
~ '0 '0 ~
:CU~u..
.... 0
o u
....
o
";::
a...
-
~~
o C
.... Q)
'0 E
~ Q)
.... Q)
Q) ~ ....
::;EQ)~
>- ....
u >- ro
C - u
Q) ~ 0
~'B ~
E ~ E
LoU 0 Q)
O~Q)
.... VI u..
'0 E ....
Q) Q) ~
.... ....
ro VI C.
~;J;E
L/')
\0
0'1
qo
qo
a
qo
.....
e
e
N
~
N
-
\0
Q) ....
~ i3 .~
U:::ll'O
Vlo::u
%oCloCl
~Eti~
...... ..., -t: c:
VI C t; ;:,
~808
....
_ C
ro Q)
:5 E
L: Q)
Q) ~
.... tl.O
c<(
o
~ ~ ti
<;::: Q) .;::
u t;
~ .~ :c
....u- Q) V'l
VI W
~ ro ...J
Q) o!:! ~
t;-gz
8 E t;;
'0 ~ ~
lij C Q)
_o~~-S~
Q) '+- C
~ E 0 5
O"Q)~U
Q)'Oc....
'0 C Q) _o~
'> ro '0
o Q) oVi '0
5. ;:, ~ U
0~Q)-g
.-~.sro
....
oCl .g
....
VI
o
Q)
;:,
u
VI
Q)
0::
~e
g-t:
z8
t; Q)
ro ....
UJU::
V'l
a...
..:.:
....
o
~
o~
.... :.:;
Q)'O
;:, Q)
u u
VI C
Q) ro
0:: >
oCl~
g~
C Z
o =>
Uo
~ U
ro
C
o
oS:
ro
....
....
t;'O
ro c:
w ro
iI
VI
Q)
Q.
ro
z
.....
oCl u
.;::
:ll e t;
Q.1::o
ro 0 Q)
Z U a
t;; Q) U)
ro .... Q)
UJiIo::
V'l
a...
L/')
II'l
L/')
M
.....
a
qo
.....
e
e
N
~
M
-
0'1
Q) ....
~ i3 o~
iI :ll '0
Vlo::u
%oCSoCl
~eti~
+-' ...... .~ c:
VI C t; ;:,
~808
....
C
ro Q)
:5 E
L: Q)
Q) ~
.... tl.O
C <(
~
u
"Vi
ro
.0
....
o
~'O
._ C
'0 ro
"> VI
o Q)
a. "g
.'!: '0
C u
=>=0 VI
t:: Q) o~
o E ....
c. ro ;:,
VI .... '0
C ro .-
~-e:~
I- (jj UJ
.... .... t::
o~o
c. 0- c..
c. 'lu c..
a.;:~
\0
L/')
II'l
M
I"-
a
qo
.....
a
a
N
-
M
M
-
0'1
~ Q) ....
u:: i3 "!!:!
VI :ll '0
.!!!O::U
g- ~ oCl
z-....>
..cEu....
...... ...., OL: c:
~s::::t;='
o 0 0"- 0
Zu U
....
_ C
ro Q)
:5 E
L: Q)
Q) ~
.... till
C <(
....
o u
...... .~
~ VI t;
<;:::~:c
Q) '> V'l
> .... UJ
OB ~ it
~ro<(
Q) .!:! Z
....'O::I:
VI Q) I-
o E 0::
U 0
-g ~ Z
ro C Q)
>Q)..c>-
:E;~.....tE
ro Q) '0 ;:,
;:, E 0
O"Q)~U
~ -g ~ .~
0> ro ~ _
0.... ~ :ll 0
c..u....u
OVlQ)-g
.-~.sro
.....
VI oCl u
OJ - ..5
Q. E .~
ro .... 0
Z c: Q)
..c 8 ;:,
t:: u
o ~ VI
ZU::~
V'l
a...
...
t:
GJ
E
:J
u
o
c_
L.
GJ
.c
E
:J
Z
...
u
ra
L.
...
t:
o
U
GJ
>
.~ GJ
u 1;
~c
LLI
...
o t:
... GJ
lG E
:e g:
ra L.
a. DO
<(
...
... t:
o GJ
CD E
E CD
ra f
z DO
<(
>
~
o
g,o
...
ra
U
ra
t:
o
~
U
t:
:J
u..
~
+:i
t:
LLI
DO
s::
+:i
II)
:::i
... L. .
t:,eo:::
GJ L. CS;
E cu w
cu.c
f E .-I
bO :J .-I
<(z2V1
0..
...
t:L.m
GJ CD \0
E.c.-l
:J E or;t
... :J ~
1;; Z or;t
t:
ti Qj
ro _
0.-
E 8
Q)'5
iI: '~
'0
c::
Q)~ ro
.s:::. .... Q)
t ro ~
o ~ ro
;zID~
....1Il~ '0 E
(5
~ ~ E
00
o
o
N
-
N
N
-
......
~Q)~~
(5 Q) ~ ~
~n;~0::
.s:::."E-t:~
t E 8 ~
o E tlIlu::
~, al iii -g
VI iii '0 ro
~C)l5\ii
....
c::
ro Q)
~ E
-= Q)
Q) ~
.... no
c::<(
VI
ti Q)
~i: 10
t:: <u ~
is g- u::
n;8o
'O'Oc::
c:: c:: ,2
o ~ '5
'P VI .0
.!2 "(Ii "L:
VI ....
'u ro ,!!l
c:: 0 "C
o .... "C
~ >- c::
0:: ~ ro
Q) ::l c::
Q) 8 .g
u.. u
~
o
u
Q)
.s:::.
....
c::
'-
~
o
U
'0
c::
ro
VI
.... >-
u ....
";: c
t:: ::l
08
VI .....
Q) 0
.C V)
ro Q)
'0 no
c:: ro
::l ....
o c::
.0 ~
tJ U"! Qj
.g ~ a.
.... 'Qj c::
VI u 0
OQ)"C
.s:::. ~ ~]
m~~]
c:: 0 Q) 0
.s:::. U Q) U
~ '- ~ en
'~i,~J!
a:: U e ti
u..>-....ro
ti~~E
~ Qj E
E~"C~
- ::> ro ....
~~
'-
U Q)
VI '-
-t: u:: Q) tl
8 -g a 'C
tlIlroVlt::
iii\ii~o
(b
.-I
or;t
0"1
.-I
or;t
00
8
N
-
N
N
-
......
'0 ....
c:: U
co "i::
]2t::Z'
o 0 5
~ (5 0
ro '- U
~g~
U 0
~ U
U::~
.....
o
>-
....
(]
....
_ c::
ro Q)
~ E
-= Q)
Q) ~
.... tlIl
c:: <(
....
.g ~ ~
t:: ro 0
i5Qj~:;::;
Q) g. u:: ~
'5 8 '0 ,~
'0 '0 c:: .~
c::l5.gti
o .... ::l .;:
+:;U'I...ct)
,!2 .~ E 0
'u ro .!!l Q)
c:: 0 "C .s:::.
0....'0....
~ >- c:: .S:
o::~ro.s:::.
~ g g .~
- U 'p ;;:0
u.. U
~
(5
U
Q)
...c:
....
.... '-
U Q)
Cll _
0.-
E 8
Q)...c:
'- ....
u:: '~ c::
ti
o 'C
U ....
'- VI
~~o
'0 -0 e
Z'l5c
(]'iii8
VI
0..
Ln
o
N
or;t
0"1
.-I
or;t
00
o
o
N
-
N
N
-
......
:::
'C
Q)
L:
VI
>-
....
c
~
o
u
...
~ ~
olE
uO
....
C
III Q)
g E
I: Q)
Q) ~
.... till
C <l:
'-
Q)
-0
C
~
VI
C
o
:;::;
'5
C
o
u
-0
C
III
VI
E
...
Q)
....
Q)
L:
VI ....
Q) VI L:
~,~ .!!!
ti~~
Cll c: t;;
a. :J cu
E~~
VI
>- C
g 8-
>-~l:l
uQjS:
:5 E "iO
till Q) 'u
~ - cu
~ Q.
E '0. VI
UJo~
~ L: .-
~cLQj
U ... L:
~ Q. VI t='
~.E~~
C .....:>
Q)-oo~
tIIlQ)....E
'P ~ t '"
'" OJ 0 Q)
;:;bc.i-
c .~ g- ~
c ~:p
cu ro ro u
-5 =a .~ ~
:c Q)~-o
3 ~ E 1ii
>-
.... Q)
C u
~lE
80
'-tt:
~ .~
o1!
UVl
VI
c..
co
Ln
0"1
o
0"1
o
or;t
......
o
o
N
-
Ln
N
-
0"1
Q) '-
~ a ,~
U::~(5
VI 0:: U
~o2lo2l
~etJ~
+-' ....., .~ c:
VI c:: t: ::l
~808
....
_ c::
Cll Q)
~ E
-= Q)
Q) ~
.... tlIl
c:: <(
>-
'-
ro
"C
c::
:J
o
i:O
Q)
U
's;
'-
Q)
VI
ro
U
o
I:
Q)
....
c::
Q)
...c:
....
tlIl
c::
'Vj
'>
Q)
a::
c::
o
'p
Cll
X
Q)
..... c::
o c::
~ Cll
'- c::
Cll 0
0.. "P
'- ro
~ "u
o ~
U VI
VI <( I.C
Cll VI 0
Q) '- 0
'- Q) N
Q) c:: Q)
...c: 3 c::
~o~
c:: Q) >-
~ ~ 5
Q) E Q)
~ E '5
tlIl 0 0
<(u....
021 .!J
'-
....
III
o
Q)
::l
u
VI
Q)
a::
~e
~c
z8
.... Q)
~ '-
UJU::
VI
0..
N
N
.-I
(b
Ln
m
0"1
\0
00
o
Ln
g
o
Ln
o
o
N
-
.-I
....
-
N
'-
Q)
....
Cll
~
'-
.~
~co
';: Q) U
o E 021
LLQ)_?:
tlIl u ....
'5 Cll 'C c::
::l l5 t:: ::l
a~08
LLI
....
V)
<( ....
3= n; ID
c ~ E
:::::i -= Q)
O Q) ~
.... tlO
V) c:: <(
Ln
o
o
~ E
o Cll
.... '-
>-tlO
.... 0
c:: '-
::l 0..
on;
U >
Q) 0
...c: E
.... Q)
Sa::
Q) Q)
U Q)
c:: '-
Cll I-
.... Q)
VI c::
.~ c::
Cll c::
Cll ,!2
"u n;
c:: '-
Cll t::
c:: ::l
u::<(
Cll ....
'0 c::
";: Q)
o E
LL,-~t
-E 2l ~ ";::
::l ro Cll t::
a~~o
~
VI
.... ....
CC"'N
GlGIGI....
E E.cl.O
~ ~ E ~
u::; ~Ol
8 ~ z m
...
GI
.c
E
~
z
....
u
III
...
....
C
o
u
GI
>
.. GI
u ....
GI III
:a:C
w
....
o C
.... GI
~ E
:e ~
III ...
Cl. bIl
<C
....
_ C
o GI
GI E
E QI
III QI
Z ~
<C
~
o
bIl
GI
....
III
U
III
C
o
~
C
~
U.
~
..
C
w
bIl
C
+:
III
::i
.... ... .
c,2a:
GI ... ~
E QI w
QI .c
! E ..-l
bIl~..-l
<cz23:
VI
l.O
o
o
N
~
.....
-
.....
.....
"'0
I::
III
~i:'
o I::
U ;:)
... 0
IllU
:2: @
15=
>0
...u
o~
...
I::
III Q)
g E
;:: Q)
Q) ~
... 00
I:: <!
.5 ~ 10
>....J::
... u ...
og;g
-g ': s:
1ll~"'O
> III I::
1:-E.1ll
=' II>
o III -;::;
U ...... .w
I:: 0 .L:;
Q) Iii ~
Q) II> III
~ &...E -::
Q) II> - 'w
.c'CI::E
1:Q)~~
Q) -.5 Q) 'Cij
Eo:'...
Q) ... .- g
~"E s: u
III III "'0 >
l:: 00 I:: III
<!~IllE
o
u
...
III
~
......0 "'0
c:
i:'.!!!
O~
II> ...
o III
...
II>
Q)
.c
II>
III
......
o
II>
...
I::
Q)
E
00
III
...
......
('(l
II>
o >
~~
'0 'u
"'OS!.
I:: Q)
('(l ...
Q) II>
II> ('(l
~ 3:
0"'0
...... .-
,(5
~VI
._ II>
a. ->
-...
u c
-='
~o
...U
r:: ...
Q)1?
E(5
~u
m
.....
l.O
m
m
0'1
m
Q)
.c
o
...
II>
...
co
Q)
a.
a.
<!
Q)"'O
.!:: Q)
a. ;:)
~ .!!!
o Q)
... ~
I:: II>
o~
:;::; r::
19 ='
= "
0.0
=' 0
"'ON
1.0
o
o
N
~
.....
-
.....
.....
"'0
I::
('(l
~i:'
o I::
U ='
... 0
('(l U
:2: ...
...... .!!!
0=
> 0
...U
o~
...
_ I::
('(l Q)
g E
;:: Q)
Q) ~
... 00
I:: <!
Q)
>
o
..c
('(l
II>
('(l
Q)
E
('(l
VI
o
u
...
CO
~
'0"'0
i:';
o~
3:
VI
m
o
l.O
.....
<:t
N
<:t
co
o
o
N
-
N
-
N
....
~
i:'.~ i:'
r:: ... r::
;:) t; ='
808
l.... (5 L-
.!!! 0 .!!!
(5.J::(5
U~U
...
I::
III Q)
g E
;:: Q)
Q) ~
... 00
r:: <!
till
.5 "'0
r:: I::
r:: ('(l ('(l
.!!! ~'O
a.Q)
... > .J::
.E 0 10
U E
I:: ~ ...
.g! II> Q)
..:: 'L:; .t::
Q) ..0 CO
t; Q) Q)
1ll"'O.J::
3:~~
~ ... I::
(5 ~ 0
V') .C .';:;
> Q) ('(l
...., ...... cu
I:: .!!! a.
=' I:: 0
8'E -
... "'0 ~
~ ('(l 0
(5-gE
U III ~
>...
... U
c: ";::
=' t;
86
"'0
~ 0
C5.J::
U~
3:
VI
II>
.L:;
-glti<c
"'0 ... :2:
a. Q)
='~~
~ u.
.!::! Q) ~
a..J:: I::
~fo~
I:: 5 ....
('(l ... I::
.... .J:: Q)
I:: .... E
Q) Q) Q)
> :0 00
Q) CO ('(l
... II> I::
Q) ... ('(l
-.5E:2:
~ E ~
~ .~ @
~ .!!! e.o
Q) ... <u
ii'i ~ E
'" ... UJ
N
o
l.O
.....
<:t
N
<:t
co
o
o
N
-
N
-
N
.....
~
II> >
Q) ....
c.5
('(l 0
zu
...... ...
o Q)
>=
...: 0
uu
...
I::
CO Q)
g E
;:: Q)
<u ~
... till
I:: <!
"'0
C
..... ('(l
~ till ~
E .5 -g 0
<u I:: ('(l .J::
toO r:: >.....
III .!!! ... III
l::a.<uE
('(l ... > ...
~.E 8~
<u Q) ~ CO
t;:O",Q)
('(l '<J; .L:; .J::
3: r:: .c .....
o Q) .5
"'0 0."'0 I::
(5~Q)0
V) '- '5 -,;:;
>.!!! tlO ~
... ..... I:: Q)
I:: I:: .L:; a.
=' <u <u 0
8 E t; -
.... t:: r:: ~
~ ('(l E 0
(5 g."'O E
U Cl ('(l ~
'"
Q)
c.
('(l
z
......
o
>
...
o
3:
VI
Vl
.;::
.clll<c
~@~
0."'0 w
=' <u ~
.:.t!U-
U <u >
'0. -.5 ~
o .J:: Q)
..... tlO tlO
"'0 =' <!
r:: 0 ...
CO .... @
....J::
I:: ..... E
<u Cl) Q)
> :0 00
Q) ('(l ('(l
.... Vl I::
Q) .... ('(l
-.5E:2:
~ E ~
~ .~ @
~ .!!! e.o
Q) .... Cl)
ii'i ~ E
Vl ... UJ
0'1
"
lI'I
l.O
lI'I
N
<:t
0'1
o
o
N
-
o
N
-
.....
"'0
I::
('(l
~i:'
o r::
U ='
... 0
('(l U
~ ....
...... .!!!
0=
> 0
...u
o~
....
r::
CO Cl)
g E
;:: Cl)
Cl) ~
.... tlO
r:: <!
... .... III
o > Q) ...
...... .... > Cl)
Q)~~"'O<c
:oo......~~
'Vi ~ 0 Cl) W
I:: .... .J:: .J:: U-
&..!!! 10 .....
II>.oE~~
~ Cl) .... =' r::
II>"'O~o....Cl)
tlO ('(l .J:: .:f
~ .s I:: ..... ....
II> .... .- Q) I::
('(l Cl) I:: Cl)
3:t;o~E
~.c.~:g~
a~~~~
> III 0 .!!! ('(l
c:-o(ij~~
='c >.J:: >
o ('(l 0 ..... U
U~E@@
.~ .c ~ -.5 ~
1::"'O('(lCl)
(5 .!!! I:: Cl) E
ua.('(l~W
o
U
....
III
~
......
0"'0
>1::
... III
o""iii
3:
VI
... ...
c c ... f',
ell ell eIIN
E E ..a ....
:J :J E ffi
u .::; :J N
g ~ Z q-
...
ell
..a
E
:J
Z
~
"'
...
...
c
o
u
ell
>
~S
ell "'
:s:C
w
...
o c
... ell
~ E
:e ~
"' ...
Q. QO
<(
...
_ c
o ell
ell E
E ell
"' ~
Z QO
<(
~
o
bO
ell
...
"'
U
"'
C
o
'+i
u
C
:J
LL.
~
',j:;
C
LU
QO
c
..
(I)
::;
...
C
ell
E
ell
ell
...
~
C'I
o
o
N
-
m
....
-
N
VI
Q)
\J
III
00'-
'-~
Q)-
> 0
LLJU
Ooi!l~
>- >-::l
558
.....
c:
III Q)
~ E
"i: Q)
Q) ~
..... tlO
.E~
'- '- III
.E~~Q)
Q)~~\J<t:
:OO--~~
.;:;; U 0
2. .~ ~ fj :.
VI.EiE~u
Q) Q) '- ::l c:
'-\JQ) Q)
.~ Ql) 4: e Ql)
~ .S: ~ -5 ::
~Q)'~~a3
3:t;o~E
~c:'~~~
~ ~ ~.~ ~
.....\J .....~
3C:~~>-
o III 0 _ u
ug;oEQ)lii
.~ c: ~ -5 e.o
C:\JIllQ)
o..!!!c:Q)E
ua.Ill:3=UJ
>-
.....
u
VI
Q)
\J
III
0110
?;cu
.- >
ULLJ
o Ii
'::c:.;
ell W
..a
E .....
:J .....
z ~ 3:
Vl
C'I
~
f',
o
o
q-
f',
..... N
c: U)
Q) 0
E 0
Q) 0
Q) 0
'- 0
0.0U)
<(q-
#
f',
o
o
N
Cl
....
-
q-
'-
Q)
.....
III
3:
'-
.~
~Eo
'C Q) U
~~oi!l
.c ~.!! C:
!i~~5
a~Ci8
a:
w
~
~ E
:IE ~ Q)
a: 0 E
o ~ ~
t- ..... Ql)
~ s::: <(
'-
Q)
.....
III
:3=
Q) E
.c '-
_ 0
o _ s:::
_ Vl 0
Q) Q) "B
U1iD::l
s::: s::: '-
~ t'O t)
.~ ~ g
VI >- u
III III rl
III :3= .c
'u Q) c..
s::: _
III III ..n
c: ~ E
i.;:: 0 Q)
0.0 -- E
.~ ~ ~
o Z 0
c.:J c.
a. 0 E
<(u
III .....
\J s:::
'C Q)
o E
u: L.. ~ t
:5~~E
::l III III VI
a3:~Ci
cr:
~
Vl
L/")
m
....
U)
q-
N
en
en
L/")
N
I
C'I
C'I
ci
VI
Q)
cr:
en
o
o
N
-
C'I
N
-
....
oi!l
VI >-
~ E
0.. ::l
III 0
ZU
-- '-
o Q)
Z >-=
o ;!: 0
-uu
S
a:
o E
Q. III Q)
~ u E
Z 0 Q)
<( "i: Q)
a:: ~ tlo
t- s::: <(
\J
s::: s:::
o III
~Q)
o~
'-
III 0
U .....
o 0
:: E
.. --
s::: 0
~ s:::
xg
Vi
0.0
s:::
'N
'C
o
.c
..
::l
<(
\JVl
~ u.:
~U)
\JO
c: N
III Q)
>- .....
..... 0..
s::: III
::l .c
o U
IllU__
Ql) Q) 0
>-.c s:::
Q) .. 0
> .S: .;:;;
Q) .-
s::: :Q ~
00,-
0.. VI 0..
::l OJ Q)
x X ::l.c
co n:J """- .....
I-~Oj(j)
~ ~ .!!! -g
Li.LL\J::l
VI
Q)
a.
III
Z
--
o
>-
_
u
cr:
I-
f',
f',
m
L/")
....
U)
en
....
o
I
o
rl
o
J..,
N
L/")
E
'-
o
LL
L/")
o
o
N
-
o
....
-
L/")
.....
s::: c:' C: VI
E 0 U \J' ~ L..
1::: '';::; VI' s::: III Q)
IlltQ)..!!!"tiO=
c..0a.~Q)8
~c..1ll0>
VlZuLLJ\J
1llC:__L..__S:::>-
\J III 0 III 0 III .....
'C ~ >- ~ >- >- 3
o __ ;!: __ :!: ;!: 0
U::ououuu
\J
s:::
III .....
\J\J s:::
Q) Q) III Q)
\J'lQUE
s:::_0Q)
Q)c~Q)
E 'w ..... ..9P
~ '- s:::.....
s:::
Q) .~ 1:: Q)
-50.0o~-5
s::: c.. '- E
E c: e a 0
e c: OJ 0.0 ~
--Ill~c:_
o c:: '- :61 a3
~ ~ .~ ~ E
Q)~o::la
.c 8.;.> _ 0
-00L..\J
-- '- Q) .- 0
~OJ-5'lQc..
E~B'E~
III >- = III E
~ "g .~ 5 .E
..... 0 'lQ tlO \J
Q)UNc:'-
0.0 Q) 'c .- III
c: ._ III c: \J
III 0 ~ ~ ~
DUOC::t;
Ql)
c: >-
-,;:; ......,
~ 0
Q) ~
.c\J
__ ..... III
~ g;o~
c: .;:;; Q)
Q) III >
E Q) LLJ
L.. Q)
1::: g \J
III .- ::l
a.\J-
Q) c: ~
o III
III c: B
~Oo..
E'g E
LL _ VI
'+- 0 ....
o o..~
~ c E
III III Q)
Ii) ~ E
VI' 0 -- 6
Q)uO _ '';::;
a.~>-Vl~ III
~~5~Cl 1:::
____ ,1ll...J 0
o 0\J1iDLi. f*
C:C:~Q)> ~
-- .- Vi > :~ '+- 10-
UU_LLJUOI-
cr:
I-
00
00
U)
q-
en
f',
en
L/")
o
o
N
-
rl
-
....
....
oi!l
VI >-
Q) E
0.. ::l
III 0
zu
-- '-
o Q)
>-=
:!: 0
UU
.....
_ s:::
III Q)
~ E
"i: Q)
Q) ~
.. tlO
c: ~
I Ql)
Q) c:
..
Qj _VI -g
=0 >- ::::l
o ;!: --
o U 0.0
C) oi!l .S:
Bt~
~.~ 0
s::: e c.
Q)c.._
E c: u
Q) 0 Q)
~ :;; 'e
c.~c..
.~ ~]
.g 8 Q)
III \J ~
1:::llll-o
000.00
a. cr: c: 0
C ~ 'c 0
III III '- 0
'- '- ::::l ....
I-LLCO~
VI
Q)
a.
III
Z
~
o
>-
.....
U
cr:
I-
... ...
c c ... C'\
Q)Q)Q)..-t
E E.aC'\
~ ~ E ~
U...~N
o 1;; z q-
0.5
...
cu
.a
E
~
z
~
lIS
...
...
C
o
u
Q)
>
:e~
~o
w
...
o c
... Q)
:c E
:e ~
tfl
'0
Q)
E
lIS
Z
>
...
o
2f'
...
lIS
U
lIS
C
o
':ij
u
C
~
u..
~
':ij
c
W
bO
C
':ij
'"
~
... ... .
coED::
E ~ ~
cu.aW
~ E ....
bO:S....
<cz2a:
I-
00
o
o
N
-
C'\
-
C'\
0<:1
'C
I::
'"
~
o i:;
U I::
... :J
'" 0
~u
.... ...
o ClI
>-=
.'!: 0
UU
...
c
Q)
E
cu
cu
...
bO
<c
....
I::
lii ClI
g E
L: ClI
ClI II!
.... bl)
I:: <(
,..r;::
(1)....0 ~
VI ClI ~ 3:
""2 ~5~
e>~~~
.~ 0 it: Ai
:0 ClI '" ~ E
~ ..r= '+- ...
a. .... 0 VI'
1::'s5j;;
ti:;~~
ClI I:: ...
U:J2t
'080
a. ClI ClI
:E:5g
~ E ~
ClI 0 ClI
I:: ... ....
3: .... I::
o >- '"
... '" E
.2! 3: bl)
~ '0 .~
'" VI 'C
~~.2
Obl)U
I- .;: .1::
"
C'\
N
N
o
m
q-
C'\
o
o
N
-
1.0
N
-
In
'"
Q)
-0
III .... ~
~ Q) .;:
Q) 0
~8U:
o02S~
>>::s
.'!: .-= 0
uuu
..... c:
o 0
+-' .p
c: III
Q) .....
E 0
t Q.
~ ~
Q) III
o~
o
o
C'\
1.0
N
m
q-
..-t
I
q-
m
In
q-
..-t
q-
:tI:
C'\
o
o
N
b-
m
-
"
-0
c:
ro
]!~
c:
o ::s
u 0
~u
~ ....
..... .~
0=
> 0
.....u
O02S
....
c:
III Q)
~ E
;:: Q)
Q) ~
.... no
c: <(
~ I1lno16~
III .!:: c: 0 co
0. ..c:'o. a: Q)
C:Q)'~~~lii
.g .go .:: ~ ~ 2=
~~~c:V)u
o -0 '012 5 ~
Q.C:a.-o",-o
~12 I::....c:
III <II 1:: ro c: III
....-Q)>Q)Q)
1-0E1::Eno
b~Q)::s~:g
....11l>OOCO
c:~eua.>
~ ~ E'~ E ~
t~c:oc:~
11l~ uOQ)
arl1l O.....:P Q)
o t''8 0 III :;:
III Q) ::s c: .~ Q)
:E -g t: .Q .... .0
....::sc:t-o..-t
.2000C:1n
u......uQ.I1lO"l
o
u
....
III
~
.....
0-0
~~
o <II
a:
I-
o
U
...
'"
~
....~
o I::
~~
o VI
....
I::
ClI
E
ClI
.... >
ClI '"
ClI a.
~ -c ~
~ :ii 3:
~~b
ClI '" VI
E ~j;;
ClI 'in bl)
~ vi'".C
ClI I:: VI
ClI .~""2
bl) VI 0
'" U ...
.: it: ii
~ e ::J
'C +-' VI
....
c:
III Q)
~ E
;:: Q)
Q) ~
..... no
c: <(
.~ 1:) ~
0::- .!!:!,-:::
:5 K ~
.....-ono~~
u c: c: .- ...J
Q)ctJ.';:;J::1....
'0 Q) ..c: no Q)
.... nono=-o
c.. ro = c:
>-C:-o~::S
UI1lQ):;:-o
~E-g"'OQ)
no = ::s III "~
<('- 0....
:;:;'..=,g
rol-=l1l....
u 0 III c: ::s
..9 0 :u 0 III
>-U."'O:~b
..... -0 Q) -0 c:
c: c: ..... "'0
::s III :u III .~
~~.; 11l,g
.9:! t;:: c: ~ :;:
"EEC:>
8~16E5
>-
....
o
<II
Q)
-0
III
1iil
....
Q)
>
w
.....
o
>
....
o
a:
I-
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Future Land Use Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper formatting
of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below.
Goal: General statement that defmes what the Element will ultimately
achieve.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describes
actions that will help achieve the goal(s).
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to
achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s).
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or
policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes.
Policy 1.4:
Policy 2.1:
Policy 2.4:
Policy 2.5:
Policy 4.5
Policy 4.7:
Policy 5.3:
Revise to allow for, but not mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace
"shall" with "may").
Revise to correct the cm Policy reference.
If changes are made to the Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion
Area density reduction factor, as proposed, then revise this policy to delete that
reference. If changes are made to Policy 6.3 to delete reference to the affordable
housing provision, as proposed, then revise this policy to delete that reference.
Revise to reflect the existence of the TCMAs (perhaps replace "shall designate"
on first line with "has designated").
Revise to recognize the periodic update (perhaps replace the last sentence with a
commitment to periodically update the inventory).
Revise to specify that a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County
or its agent unless first approved by the Board, to add reference to the Immokalee
Redevelopment Plan, and to correct the date reference.
Revise to clarify changes to the Urban designation refers to the new designation of
lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the third line with "addition").
1
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 5.14:
Objective 6:
Policy 6.3:
Objective 7:
Policy 7.3:
Policy 7.7:
Revise as necessary to reflect the changed status and contents of the Inter-local
Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the Public School
Facilities Element.
Revise to reference the establishment of TCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace
"are hereby" in the last sentence with "have been").
Revise paragraph e) to begin with a verb so as to follow the sentence structure
(perhaps add "Providing" before "Vehicular"); delete paragraph d) referring to the
affordable housing provision; and, make correlating change to Transportation
Element Policy 5.5.
Revise to reference reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce
greenhouse gas emissions," on the second line after "policies,".
Revise for proper wording (perhaps replace "and their interconnection points"
with "and/or provide interconnection(s)."
Revise to update the Division name.
Density Rating System - Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus: Revise to prohibit applicability
within the CHHA.
Density Rating System - Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus: Revise to prohibit applicability
within the CHHA.
Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area: Delete, and replace with a Coastal High Hazard
Area density reduction factor; so reflect this on the FLUM; make correlating changes to all GMP
references to this provision; and, revise both the Roadway Access and Proximity to Mixed Use
Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuses to replace reference
to this provision with CHHA reference.
Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict: Revise to reduce allowable density for residential-only
projects within the CHHA to a maximum of 4 DU/A; revise the Master Planned Activity Center
provision for clarity, and possible substantive change.
Rural Fringe Mixed Use District: Revise to clarify the District only applies to A-zoned lands; to
correct a miss-numbering in the RFMUD Sending Lands designation; and, revise the Exemption
provision to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and to delete unneeded text from the Exemption
title.
Overlays and Special Features, Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay: Revise, if
possible, to provide clarity to this Overlay and/or related FLUE provisions.
Future Land Use Map: Revise the CHHA boundary to correlate with any CHHA boundary
description change made in CCME Policy 12.2.5.
2
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Planning Horizon Issue: Revise the various planning horizons in the GMP to be consistent.
Designation/District/Subdistrict Relationship: Revise throughout to clarify the relationship between
Designations, Districts and Subdistricts.
Map FLUE-14 Existing Zoning Consistent with FLUE by Policy, Immokalee Area: Delete;
replacement map to be adopted into the Immokalee Area Master Plan to correlate with new Policy
6.1.9 in that Master Plan.
EAR BCC - FLUE Summary of Recommended Changes as approved for DCA on 1-31-11 - CLEAN
G:ICDES Planning ServiceslComprehensivelDavidl2011 EAR - dwlAdoption docs dw/2-4-11
3
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Success and Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Future Land Use Element
A. Introduction and Background
The Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP)
establishes the geographic framework for growth and development in Collier County. As such, the
FLUE is the most frequently amended portion of the GMP. Since the adoption of the County's 2004
EAR-based Amendments in January 2007, the FLUE has been amended on six occasions.
The FLUE includes three major sections: an Overview, the Implementation Section, and a Support
Document containing land use data and analysis. The purpose of the Overview is to provide an
introduction as to the purpose, basis and underlying concepts and special issues addressed by the
FLUE. The Implementation Strategy is where the Element is brought into legal effect. Included within
this section are the Goals, Objectives, Policies and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and correlating
Future Land Use Designation Description Section. Collier County's FLUE gives emphasis to the
future land use categories (designations) contained in the Future Land Use Designation Description
Section of the Implementation Strategy. The Support Document is comprised of land use data and
analysis which provides a basis for the Implementation Strategy and serves to meet the requirements of
Section 9J-5.006, Florida Administrative Code, minimum requirements for the FLUE.
The overall purpose of the FLUE is to guide decision-making with regard to regulatory, financial and
programmatic matters pertaining to land use. This Element controls the location, type, intensity and
timing of new or revised uses of land. The land use strategy is closely coordinated with the County's
strategy for the provision of public facilities, as described in the Capital Improvements and Public
Facility Elements (and Sub-elements) of the GMP and with the strategies to protect and conserve
natural resources as found in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
HB 697 was enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008, and now, in part, is codified within Ch.
163.3177(6)(a) and (d). It requires the future land use plan to discourage urban sprawl, to be based
upon energy-efficient land use patterns and to include greenhouse gas reduction strategies. All of these
requirements are addressed in the existing Objectives and Policies within the FLUE, as noted in the
assessment below. HB 697 also requires the future land use map to "identify and depict ... energy
conservation." Collier County has no energy conservation features, such as the DeSoto Next
Generation Solar Energy Center in DeSoto County, to depict on its future land use map. Instead,
energy conservation measures occur at a micro scale, e.g. solar panels on individual single family
dwellings.
B. Objective Analysis
OBJECTIVE 1 :
Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall
be consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use
Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Sub-districts shall be
4
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
binding on all Development Orders effective with the adoption of this Growth Management
Plan. Standards and permitted uses for each Future Land Use District and Subdistrict are
identified in the Designation Description Section. Through the magnitude, location and
configuration of its components, the Future Land Use Map is designed to coordinate land use
with the natural environment including topography, soil and other resources; promote a sound
economy; coordinate coastal population densities with the Regional Hurricane Evacuation
Plan; and discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl. [This Objective is provided for
contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 1.4:
The CONSERVATION Future Land Use Designation shall include a Future Land Use District.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy has existed in the FLUE since the GMP was adopted in 1989. A District has never been
created - or needed - in this Designation. However, the potential remains for a District to be created.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to allow for, but not
mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace "shall" with "may").
OBJECTIVE 2:
The coordination of land uses with the availability of public facilities shall be accomplished
through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvements Element and
implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development
Code. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 2.1 :
The County shall prepare annually the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public
Facilities which shall include a determination of the existing conditions of capital public
facilities, determine the remaining available capacity, forecast future needs in the five year
capital improvement schedule and identify needed improvements and funding to maintain the
level of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvements Element.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The annual preparation of an AUIR continues to be a valuable tool for Collier County.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to correct the CIE Policy
reference.
5
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 2.4
Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a) 3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban
Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element, development located within the South U.S.
41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) (See Map TR-4) may be exempt from
transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are
mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element.
Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that obtain an exception from concurrency
requirements for transportation, pursuant to the certification process described in
Transportation Element, Policy 5.5, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00
the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended) as part of their plan of development
shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion Density Reduction requirement as contained in
the Density Rating System of this Element.
Developments within the Northwest and East-Central TCMAs that meet the requirements of
FLUE Policies 6.1 through 6.5, and Transportation Policies 5.7 and 5.8, and that include
affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as
amended) as part of their plan of development shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion
Density Reduction requirement as contained in the Density Rating System of this Element.
Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to
Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or
not a concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency
review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development
and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
For the most part, the provisions of this Policy remain viable and appropriate.
This Policy mostly remains relevant and should be retained but revised. If changes are made to the
Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion Area density reduction factor, as proposed
later in this FLUE Assessment, then this policy should be revised to delete that reference. Similarly,
reference to the affordable housing provision should be deleted if that same change is made to Policy
6.3, as proposed later in this FLUE Assessment.
Policy 2.5
The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to
encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads
is in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips.
Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles
meeting the LOS described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the Transportation Element. Standards
within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development
within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and Policies 6.1
through 6.5 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are
hereby designated:
6
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
1. Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side;
the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side;
and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (See Map TR-5).
2. East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier
Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road
(extended) on the west side (See Map TR-6).
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County has designated both referenced TCMAs.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to reflect the existence of
the TCMAs (perhaps replace "shall designate" on first line with "has designated").
OBJECTIVE 4:
In order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public
facilities, economic development, housing and urban design, the Future Land Use Element
shall be continually refined through detailed planning. Future studies might address specific
geographic or issue areas. All future studies must be consistent with the Growth Management
Plan and further its intent. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is
proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 4.5:
An Industrial Land Use Study has been developed and a summary of the Study has been
incorporated into the support document of this Growth Management Plan. The Study includes
a detailed inventory of industrial uses, projections of demand for industrial land, and
recommendations for future land use allocations and locational criteria. Subsequent to
completion of the Economic Element of this Growth Management Plan, adopted in December
2003, staff shall prepare an update to the Industrial Land Use Study.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy provides historical reference to an Industrial Land Use Study. Collier County has prepared
an update to the Study, by updating the Industrial inventory, about every 2-3 years, depending upon
staffing and workload. Such updates should continue to be prepared.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to recognize the periodic
update (perhaps replace the last sentence with a commitment to periodically update the inventory).
Policy 4.7:
The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for
existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses,
7
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage
redevelopment. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the
Board on March 14, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area
formed by US 41 East, Davis Boulevard and Airport-Pulling Road. Other specific areas that
may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are
not necessarily limited to:
a. Pine Ridge Road, between U.S. 41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road;
b. U.S. 41 North in Naples Park; and,
c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1
Subdivision.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The only redevelopment plans approved by the Board are within the boundaries of a CRA
(Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and lmmokalee). Preparation of redevelopment plans in the future, as
may be directed by the Board, remains an appropriate planning opportunity. Omitted from this Policy
is reference to the lmmokalee Redevelopment Plan. Also, the referenced date is incorrect.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to specify that such a
redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless first approved by the
Board, to add reference to the lmmokalee Redevelopment Plan, and to correct the date reference.
Policy 4.8:
Maintain and update, on an annual basis, the following demographic and land use information:
existing permanent population, existing seasonal population, projected population, existing
dwelling units, and projected dwelling units. Included with this database shall be a forecast of
the geographic distribution of anticipated growth.
Population estimates and projections shall be based upon the most recent population bulletin
from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), except
where decennial census estimates are available. For the annually updated Capital
Improvement Plan, on a continuously rolling basis, population projections shall be calculated
for all public facilities using BEBR's medium range growth rate. Population definitions are
provided in Policy 1.2 of the Capital Improvement Element.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County prepares the information required by this Policy and should continue to do so.
However, the County should evaluate the presently-used geographic distribution areas (Planning
Communities) for appropriateness of boundaries.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.
8
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
OBJECTIVE 5:
In order to promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for
listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and
further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element, the following general land use
policies shall be implemented upon the adoption of the Growth Management Plan. [This
Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy Relevance:
Policy 5.3:
Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community
facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the
Future Land Use Map; requiring that any changes to the Urban Designated Areas be
contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use
planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's
Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive
areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses,
and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
Collier County implements this Policy through the provisions of the Urban designation as well as the
Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to clarify changes to the
Urban designation refers to the new designation of lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the
third line with "addition").
Public Comment (Community Meeting held on 1/25/10):
Public stated, regarding below item at FLUE Policy 5.6 ("encourage "experimental" zoning ... "),
change the TDR program to require use of TDR's to obtain additional density (cluster housing,
guesthouses).
Policy 5.14:
Public educational plants and ancillary plants:
a. Existing public educational plants and ancillary plants: The sites containing existing public
educational plants (schools and associated on-site facilities, including sports stadiums,
gymnasiums and recreation areas) and ancillary plants (support facilities, including
administrative offices, transportation facilities, maintenance yards, and bus barns) are
depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map
Series. This includes four sites where educational plants have been approved but
construction either has not commenced or is not completed. More detailed descriptions or
9
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
depictions of all of the sites containing these existing educational plants and ancillary
plants are contained in the FLUE Support Document. Expansion of these educational
plants and ancillary plants on these existing sites, as well as expansions to the sites
themselves, are subject to the provisions outlined in the general Interlocal Agreement,
adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the
Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an
effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development
regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR)
Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on
May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land
development regulations.
b. Existing sites for future public educational plants: The Collier County School Board has
acquired numerous sites for which educational plants are planned for future development;
these sites contain no existing educational plants. These sites are consistent with
locational criteria established by the SBR Interlocal Agreement and as contained in the
FLUE, GGAMP, or lAMP, as applicable, and are allowed within the existing zoning district
on the property. These sites are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public
School Facilities Element Map Series. Development of the mapped sites shall be subject to
the provisions of the general Interlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier
County School Board and on May 27,2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as
subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject
to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to
the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the
Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners,
and subject to the implementing land development regulations.
c. Existing sites for future public ancillary plants: The Collier County School Board has
acquired sites for which ancillary plants are planned for future development; these sites
contain no existing ancillary plants. These sites are consistent with locationa I criteria
established by the SBR Interlocal Agreement and as contained in the FLUE, GGAMP, or
lAMP, as applicable, and are allowed within the existing zoning district on the property.
These sites are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities
Element Map Series. Development of the mapped sites shall be subject to the provisions of
the general Interlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School
Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently
amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the
implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the
School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier
County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and
subject to the implementing land development regulations.
d. Future sites for public educational plants and ancillary plants: As additional sites for
educational plants and ancillary plants are acquired by the Collier County School Board
and deemed to be consistent with the FLUE, GGAMP, or lAMP, as applicable, and allowed
by existing zoning on the site, these sites will be added to the Future Land Use Map Series
and Public School Facilities Element Map Series, as provided for in the general Interlocal
Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27,
10
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated,
with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land
development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to and the School Board
Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School
Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. Future development of
these sites will be subject to the provisions of the aforementioned general Interlocal
Agreement and SBR Interlocal Agreement, and subject to the implementing land
development regulations. Prior to site acquisition, the Collier County School District will
provide notification to property owners as follows: 1) for sites located within the Urban
Designated Area of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, notices
shall be sent to all owners of property within 500 linear feet of the property lines of the site
under consideration for acquisition; 2) for sites not located within the Urban Designated
Area of the FLUE of the Growth Management Plan, notices shall be sent to all owners of
property within 1,000 linear feet of the property lines of the site under consideration for
acquisition. At the public hearing to consider the land acquisition, all public commentary
received as a result of these notices will be provided to the Collier County School Board.
e. Zoning district provisions for future educational plants: Except to the extent that such
would be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District adopted on June 19, 2002, or
the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay adopted on October 22, 2002, all future
educational plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as follows:
(1) Educational plants are prohibited in the Residential Tourist (RT), Golf Course (GC),
Conservation (CON), Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC),
Business Park (BP), and Industrial (I) zoning districts.
(2) Educational plants are permitted by right in all other zoning districts. However, for a
high school facility to be located in any residential zoning district, or Estates (E) zoning
district, or residential component of a PUD, a formal compatibility review and
determination is required, as set forth in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on
May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of
County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective
date of December 2008, and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement,
adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by
the Board of County Commissioners.
f. Zoning district provisions for future ancillary plants: Except to the extent that such would
be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District adopted on June 19, 2002, or the
Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay adopted on October 22, 2002, all future ancillary
plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as follows:
(1) Ancillary plants are prohibited in the Residential Single Family (RSF-1 through RSF-6),
Mobile Home (MH), Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC), Golf
Course (GC), and Conservation (CON) zoning districts.
(2) Ancillary plants are permitted by right in the General Commercial (C-4), Heavy
Commercial (C-5), and Industrial (I) zoning districts.
(3) Ancillary plants are permitted by conditional use approval in all other zoning districts.
11
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy recognizes and implements the two Inter-local Agreements adopted in 2003 by the BCC
and Collier County School Board. Since then, one of the Agreements has been superseded (adopted in
2008 along with the Public School Facilities Element), the other one has expired and its replacement is
presently being negotiated.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised as necessary to reflect the
changed status and contents of the Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the
Public School Facilities Element.
OBJECTIVE 6
Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) are geographically compact areas
designated in local government comprehensive plans where intensive development exists, or
such development is planned. New development within a TCMA shall occur in a manner that
will ensure an adequate level of mobility (as defined in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation
Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals
and policies: discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources,
protecting historic resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and
promoting public transit, bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant
automobile. Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby established in the
specific geographic areas described in Policy 2.5 of this Element.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
TCMAs remain a viable transportation management tool. This Objective is still appropriate, all the
more so given the requirements and direction ofHB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to reference the
establishment of TCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace "are hereby" in the last sentence with "have
been").
Public Comment (Community Meeting held on 1/25/10):
Public stated County should reserve right-oj-way for light rail.
Policy Relevance:
Policy 6.3:
In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or
redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management
Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies, as may be applicable:
12
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project.
b) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier County
Transit).
c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to abutting commercial
properties.
d) Including affordable housing (minimum of 25% of the units) within the development.
e) Vehicular access to abutting commercial properties.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
This Policy is mostly still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and direction ofHB 697
enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008. The need for affordable housing is greatly lessened so
paragraph d) is no longer appropriate.
This Policy remains mostly relevant and should be retained, but paragraph e) should be revised to
begin with a verb so as to follow the sentence structure (perhaps add "Providing" before "Vehicular"),
paragraph d) should be deleted, and a correlating change should be made to Transportation Element
Policy 5.5.
OBJECTIVE 7
In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Setter Places: The
Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and
adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be
implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The direction provided by this Objective is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and
direction of HB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008. Comprehensive Planning staff
reviews all rezone and conditional use petitions for compliance with the Policies under this Objective.
This Objective remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to reference reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce greenhouse gas emissions," on the second line after
"po lic ies,".
Public Comment (Community Meeting held on 1125110):
Public stated encourage smart growth principles - mixed use, urban injill, walkable communities,
alternate transportation modes, and more green space.
Policy Relevance:
13
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 7.3
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of
land use type.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The direction provided by this Policy is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and
direction of HB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised for proper wording as
connecting interconnection points is nonsensical (perhaps replace "and their interconnection points"
with "and/or provide interconnection(s)."
Public Comment (Community Meeting held on 3/15/10):
Public stated stress interconnection and continuity.
Policy 7.7
The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will continue to research
smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically
addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land
development regulations.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The direction provided by this Policy is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and
direction ofHB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to update the Division name
to reflect 20 I 0 reorganization.
C. Future Land Use Designation Description - Assessment of Select Provisions
In addition to the above Assessment of FLUE GOPs, staff provides below an Assessment of select
portions of the Future Land Use Designation Description Section.
Urban Designation, Density Rating System
Residentiallnfill
To encourage residential in-fill in areas of existing urban development outside of the Coastal
High Hazard Area, a maximum of 3 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be added if
the following criteria are met:
(a) The project is 20 acres or less in size;
(b) At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer;
(c) The project is compatible with surrounding land uses;
14
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
(d) The property in question has no common site development plan with adjacent property;
(e) There is no common ownership with any adjacent parcels;
(f) The parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential
density bonus and was created before the adoption of this provision in the Growth
Management Plan on January 10, 1989;
(g) Of the maximum 3 additional units, one (1) dwelling unit per acre shall be transferred
from Sending Lands; and,
(h) Projects qualifying under this provision may increase the density administratively by a
maximum of one dwelling unit per acre by transferring that additional density from
Sending Lands.
Provision Analysis:
In the FLUE, the system currently contains both density bonuses and a density reduction. Within most
parts of the Urban Area, the base (or minimum) eligible residential density (i.e., the number of units
allowed per acre) is four units per gross acre and the maximum eligible density is 16 units per acre,
with one exception; eligible density is not an entitlement. This system allows a residential project, or
the residential portion of a mixed-use project, to request increased residential density above the base
density, or to lose density, if the project meets certain criteria. There are seven density bonus
provisions and one density reduction provision. A project may, or may not, be eligible for any number
or combination ofthese bonuses.
The Residential Infill bonus has existed since the GMP was adopted III 1989 and has been used
numerous times. However, as part of the Rural Fringe GMP amendments adopted in 2002, this bonus
provision was modified to increase the eligible property size from 10 to 20 acres, and to add the
requirement that part of the density bonus be derived from TDR credits obtained from RFMUD
Sending Lands. The purpose of requiring TDR credits was to help insure the success of the TDR
program. It has not worked; since the 2002 amendment, this bonus provision has rarely been used -
perhaps once or twice. Though the purpose for requiring use of TDR credits remains valid, that
requirement has stifled the use ofthis bonus provision intended to encourage infill development.
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the TDR requirement be eliminated. However, the
Board of County Commissioners determined this provision should remain unchanged.
Urban Designation, Density Rating System
Traffic Congestion Area:
If the project lies within the Traffic Congestion Area, an area identified as subject to long range
traffic congestion, one dwelling unit per gross acre would be subtracted from the eligible base
density of four dwelling units per acre. The Traffic Congestion Boundary is shown on the
Future Land Use Map and consists of the western coastal Urban Designated Area seaward of a
boundary marked by Airport-Pulling Road (including an extension north to the Lee County
boundary.) Davis Boulevard, County Barn Road, and Rattlesnake Hammock Road consistent
15
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
with the Mixed Use Activity Center's residential density band located at the southwest
quadrant of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and County Road 951 (including
an extension to the east, but exclusive of the outlying Urban designated areas of Copeland,
Port of the Islands, Plantation Island, and Chokoloskee). Properties adjacent to the Traffic
Congestion Area shall be considered part of the Traffic Congestion Area if their only access is
to a road forming the boundary of the Area; however, if that property also has an access point
to a road not forming the boundary of the Traffic the Traffic Congestion Area it will not be
subject to the density reduction. Furthermore, the density reduction shall not apply to
developments located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (as identified within Transportation
Element, Map TR-4, and Transportation Element Policies 5.5 and 5.6, and FLUE Policy 2.4) that
obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation, pursuant to the
certification process described in Transportation Element Policy 5.6, and that include
affordable housing (as per Section 2.7.7 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as
amended) as part of the plan of development. This reduction shall likewise not be applied to
developments within the Northwest and East-Central TCMAs that meet the requirements of
FLUE Policies 6.1 through 6.5, and Transportation Element Policies 5.7 and 5.8, and that
include Affordable Housing (as per Section 2.7.7. of the Collier County Land Development
Code, as amended) as part of the plan of development.
Provision Analysis:
The Traffic Congestion Area, which is depicted on the FLUM, is the only density reduction provision
in the FLUE. If a proposed rezoning project is within the Traffic Congestion Area, defined as "an area
identified as subject to long range traffic congestion," one dwelling unit per gross acre is deducted.
The Traffic Congestion Area density reduction has existed since the GMP was adopted in 1989.
It was intended as a means of reducing long-range traffic impacts of new development within that
portion of the coastal urban area that was considered to be subject to traffic congestion in the long
term; due to physical and social constraints in this area, construction of new major roads and
significant widening of existing roads would not be possible. However, it has not been successful in
limiting density because the Density Rating System includes various density bonuses that are
applicable within this area, thereby allowing the I DU/ A density reduction to be counteracted. Also,
many projects, especially larger ones, do not build out at their approved density; therefore the desired
lower density may result without this regulatory feature. Finally, Transportation staff has since
determined this density reduction is not needed. The County has adopted a "checkbook" concurrency
system that, in many ways, obviates the need for the Traffic Congestion reduction factor. For these
reasons, staff proposes deletion of this provision - as was previously proposed in the 2004 EAR.
Also as proposed in the 2004 EAR, staff recommends a new density reduction factor be added in place
of the Traffic Congestion Area - a Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) density reduction factor for
properties lying within the CHHA. The CHHA, depicted on the FLUM, is, as would be expected,
more closely related to reduction of hurricane evacuation impacts, a concern for all coastal
communities. Also, a CHHA density reduction factor would not be as much of a disincentive to urban
infill as it would incorporate a smaller portion of the urban area - the CHHA is smaller than the Traffic
Congestion Area.
16
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the Traffic Congestion Area density reduction factor
be deleted and replaced with a Coastal High Hazard Area density reduction factor and so reflected on
the FLUM; that correlating changes be made to all GMP references to the Traffic Congestion Area;
and, that both the Roadway Access and Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange
Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuses be revised to replace reference to Traffic
Congestion Area with CHHA reference; and, revise the Conversion of Commercial Bonus to prohibit
its application within the CHHA. The Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus would continue
to apply within the CHHA. The Board of County Commissioners concurred, except that they
determined the Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus provision also should be prohibited
within the CHHA.
f!1ecommendation from October 8. 2010 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Comments to
the DCA on ProlJosed EAR (Comment #14): "Please provide analyses to establish the impact of
deleting the Traffic Congestion Area Density reduction factor and replacing it with the Coastal High
Hazard Area reduction factor. Should substantial additional development occur from this amendment,
the department recommends that an Area Wide Traffic Study be conducted and supporting
documentation provided to establish that adequate capacity will be available for new trips that will
impact state facilities for the long-term horizon year and short-term year 2015 conditions. "
Collier County response:
There are approximately 480 acres of land zoned A, Rural Agricultural that could potentially be
rezoned to residential zoning districts within the area presently encompassed by the Traffic Congestion
Area that would no longer be if the recommended amendment was adopted; this would yield a
potential density increase of806 dwelling units. However, it is reasonable to assume that not all of this
land will be rezoned to residential zoning districts, rather some may be developed under the "A"
zoning district which allows a variety of institutional uses (child care center, church, nursing home,
private school, social and fraternal organizations, retail plant nursery, etc.) and essential services
(fire/police/emergency medical service stations, public parks, government offices, etc.), and some may
rezone to residential at a density not utilizing this amendment. Assuming a 75% rezone rate utilizing
the increased density allowance, the potential density increase of the recommended amendment would
be 605 DUs. Based upon property locations, these DUs could be distributed throughout the affected
area, from along US 41 North near the Lee County line to east of Collier Blvd. along US 41 East.
Urban Designation, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (partial
excerpt)
Mixed Use Activity Centers have been designated on the Future Land Use Map Series
identified in the Future Land Use Element. The locations are based on intersections of major
roads and on spacing criteria. When this Plan was originally adopted in 1989, there were 21
Activity Centers. There are now 19 Activity Centers, listed below, which comprise
approximately 3,000 acres; this includes 3 Interchange Activity Centers (#4, 9, 10) which will be
17
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
discussed separately under the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict. Two Activity Centers,
#19 and 21, have been deleted as they are now within the incorporated City of Marco Island.
# 1 Immokalee Road and Airport-Pulling Road
# 2 US 41 and Immokalee Road
# 3 Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard
# 4 1-75 and Immokalee Road (Interchange Activity Center)
# 5 US 41 and Vanderbilt Beach Road
# 6 Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard
# 7 Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard
# 8 Airport-Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway
# 9 1-75 and Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard (Interchange Activity Center)
#101-75 and Pine Ridge Road (Interchange Activity Center)
#11 Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road
#12 US 41 and Pine Ridge Road
#13 Airport-Pulling Road and Pine Ridge Road
#14 Goodlette-Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway
#15 Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Boulevard
#16 US 41 and Airport-Pulling Road
#17 US 41 and Rattlesnake-Hammock Road
#18 US 41 and Collier Boulevard
#20 US 41 and Wiggins Pass Road
The Mixed-Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial
zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and
disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the
community. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. Further,
they are generally intended to be developed at a human-scale, to be pedestrian-oriented, and
to be interconnected with abutting projects - whether commercial or residential. Street,
pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties, where possible
and practicable, are encouraged.
Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial uses,
residential uses, institutional uses, hotel/motel uses at a maximum density of 26 units per
acre, community facilities, and other land uses as generally allowed in the Urban designation.
The actual mix of the various land uses shall be determined during the rezoning process
based on consideration of the factors listed below. Except as restricted below under the
provision for Master Planned Activity Centers, all Mixed Use Activity Centers may be
developed with any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict.
For residential-only development, if a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use
Activity Center which is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict or Urban Coastal
Fringe Subdistrict, up to 16 residential units per grow acre may be permitted. If such a project
is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the Urban
Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre,
except as allows by the density rating system. If such a project is located within the
boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the Urban Residential Fringe
18
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Subdistrict, eligible density shall be as allowed by that Subdistrict. For a residential-only
project located partially within and partially outside of an Activity Center, the density
accumulated from the Activity Center portion of the project may be distributed throughout the
project.
Mixed-use developments - whether consisting of residential units located above commercial
uses, in an attached building, or in a freestanding building - are allowed and encouraged
within Mixed Use Activity Centers. Density for such a project is calculated based upon the
gross project acreage within the Activity Center. If such a project is located within the
boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is not within the Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict and is not within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the eligible density is sixteen
dwelling units per acre. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use
Activity Center that is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict but is within the
Coastal High Hazard Area, the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre.
If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within
the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, eligible density shall be as allowed by that
Subdistrict. For a project located partially within and partially outside of an Activity Center,
and the portion within an Activity Center is developed as mixed use, some of the density
accumulated from the Activity Center portion of the project may be distributed to that portion
of the project located outside of the Activity Center. In order to promote compact and walkable
mixed use projects, where the density from a mixed use project is distributed outside the
Activity Center boundary:
(1) the mixed use component of the project within the Activity Center shall include a
minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the Activity Center-accumulated density;
(2) the dwelling units distributed outside the Activity Center shall be located within one
third (1/3) of a mile of the Activity Center boundary; and,
(3) the portion of the project within the Activity Center shall be developed at a human
scale, be pedestrian-oriented, and be interconnected with the remaining portion of the
project with pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
Provision Analysis:
Mixed Use Activity Centers (MUAC) allow almost all land uses (industrial uses are excluded) - the
full array of commercial uses, mixed use (residential and commercial), residential uses, agricultural
uses, community facility uses, essential services, etc. Most MUACs allow residential-only projects at
the highest density allowed by the FLUE (16 DU/A), including most of the CHHA; the exception is
those portions ofMUACs within the Urban Coastal Fringe are capped at 4 DU/A. However, mixed use
projects within the CHHA are capped at 4 DU/A. Further, the allowance for 16 DU/A is in contrast
with most density bonus provisions which are not applicable within the CHHA, and the remaining ones
that are proposed to be revised so as not to be applicable in the CHHA. Given the longstanding and
continuing concern for development, especially residential, within the CHHA, CHHA density should
be consistently limited.
19
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
The County recommends the allowable density for residential-only projects within the CHHA be
reduced to a maximum of 4 DU/A, the same as for mixed use projects.
Urban Designation, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (partial
excerpt)
Master Planned Activity Centers
Any of the five Mixed Use Activity Centers listed below may be designated as a Master Planned
Activity Center. A Master Planned Activity Center is one which has a unified plan of
development in the form of a Planned Unit Development, Development of Regional Impact or
an area-wide Development of Regional Impact. Property owners within such Mixed Use
Activity Centers shall be required to utilize the Master Planned Activity Center process, as
provided below.
# 2 US 41 and Immokalee Road
# 3 Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard
# 5 US 41 and Vanderbilt Beach Road
# 7 Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard
#14 Goodlette-Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway
In recognition of the benefit resulting from the coordination of planned land uses and
coordinated access points to the public road network, Master Planned Activity Centers are
encouraged through the allowance of flexibility in the boundaries, and thus location of uses
permitted within a designated Mixed Use Activity Center. The boundaries of Master Planned
Activity Centers depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series are understood to be flexible and
subject to modification as provided for below. However, the acreage within the reconfigured
Activity Center shall not exceed that within the existing Activity Center. The actual mix of land
uses shall be determined using the criteria for other Mixed Use Activity Centers. All of the
following criteria must be met for a project to qualify as a Master Planned Activity Center:
1. The applicant shall have unified control of the majority of a quadrant in a designated
Activity Center. Majority of the quadrant shall be defined as at least 51% of the privately
owned land within any Activity Center quadrant. However, if a property owner has less
than 51% ownership within a quadrant, that property owner may still request a rezoning
under the provisions of a Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict subject to the maximum
acreage allowed in Paragraph 2 below. Property owners with less than 51% ownership are
encouraged to incorporate vehicular and pedestrian accesses with adjacent properties
within the Activity Center. Any publicly owned land within the quadrant will be excluded
from acreage calculations to determine unified control.
2. The allowable land uses for a Master Planned Activity Center shall be the same as for other
designated Activity Centers; however, a Master Planned Activity Center encompassing the
majority of the property in two or more quadrants shall be afforded the flexibility to
redistribute a part or all of the allocation from one quadrant to another, to the extent of the
unified control. The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #3
(Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant for a total of 160 acres
maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the land area shall be limited to non-
commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. The maximum amount of
20
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #7 (Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier
Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant, except that the northeast quadrant may have a total of
59 acres, for a total of 179 acres maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the
land area shall be limited to non-commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity
Centers. With respect to the +/- 19 acres in the northeast quadrant of Activity Center #7,
said acreage lying adjacent to the east of the Hammock Park Commerce Center PUD,
commercial development (exclusive of the allowed "1/4 mile support medical uses") shall
be limited to a total of 185,000 square feet of the following uses: personal indoor self-
storage facilities - this use shall occupy no greater than 50% of the total (185,000) building
square feet; offices for various contractor/builder construction trade specialists inclusive
of the offices of related professional disciplines and services that typically serve those
construction businesses or otherwise assist in facilitating elements of a building and
related infrastructure, including but not limited to architects, engineers, land surveyors and
attorneys - these offices of related professional disciplines and services shall occupy no
greater than 50% of the total (185,000) building square feet; warehouse space for various
contractor/builder construction trades occupants; mortgage and land title companies;
related businesses including but not limited to lumber and other building materials dealers,
paint, glass, and wallpaper stores, garden supply stores - all as accessory uses only,
accessory to offices for various contractor/builder construction trade specialists or
accessory to warehouse space for various contractor/builder construction trades
occupants; management associations of various types of buildings or provision of
services to buildings/properties; and, fitness centers. Activity Center #14 (Goodlette-Frank
Road and Golden Gate Parkway) shall have a maximum of 45 acres for commercial use, the
balance of the land uses shall be limited to non-commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use
Activity Centers.
3. The location and configuration of all land uses with in a Master Planned Activity Center shall
be compatible with and related to existing site features, surrounding development, and
existing natural and manmade constraints. Commercial uses shall be oriented so as to
provide coordinated and functional transportation access to major roadways serving the
Activity Center, and functionally related or integrated with surrounding land uses and the
planned transportation network.
4. Adjacent properties within the Activity Center that are not under the unified control of the
applicant shall be considered and appropriately incorporated (i.e. pedestrian, bicycle and
vehicular interconnections) into the applicant's Master Plan.
Provision Analysis:
The Master Planned Activity Center provision is an example of "legislation on the fly" (it was mostly
written at and during a public hearing) - it is poorly written and confusing.
The County recommends this Master Planned Activity Center provision be rewritten for clarity, and
possible substantive change, likely to include reorganization/restructuring of the provision.
Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (select excerpts)
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is identified on Future Land Use Map. This District
consists of approximately 93,600 acres, or 7% of Collier County's total land area. Significant
portions of this District are adjacent to the Urban area or to the semi-rural, rapidly developing,
21
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
large-lot North Golden Gate Estates platted lands. Agricultural land uses within the Rural
Fringe Mixed Use District do not represent a significant portion of the County's active
agricultural lands. As of the date of adoption of this Plan Amendment, the Rural Fringe Mixed
Use District consists of more than 5,550 tax parcels, and includes at least 3,835 separate and
distinct property owners. Alternative land use strategies have been developed for the Rural
Fringe Mixed Use District, in part, to consider these existing conditions.
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides a transition between the Urban and Estates
Designated lands and between the Urban and Agricultural/Rural and Conservation designated
lands farther to the east. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District employs a balanced approach,
including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property
rights, providing for large areas of open space, and allowing, in designated areas, appropriate
types, density and intensity of development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District allows for a
mixture of urban and rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and
sewer, schools, recreational facilities, commercial uses and essential services deemed
necessary to serve the residents of the District. In order to preserve existing natural
resources, including habitat for listed species, to retain a rural, pastoral, or park-like
appearance from the major public rights-of-way within this area, and to protect private
property rights, the following innovative planning and development techniques are required
and/or encouraged within the District.
***
***
***
***
***
***
break ***
***
***
***
***
***
Sending Lands: Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental
value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed
species.
7. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are limited to the following:
a) Agricultural uses consistent with Chapter 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to
Farm Act)
b) Detached single-family dwelling units, including mobile homes where the Mobile Home
Zoning Overlay exists, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 40 acres or one
dwelling unit per lot or parcel of less than 40 acres, which existed on or before June 22,
1999. For the purpose of this provision, a lot or parcel which is deemed to have been in
existence on or before June
22, 1999 is 1) a lot or parcel which is part of a subdivision recorded in the public
records of Collier County, Florida; or 2) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed
boundaries, described by metes and bounds or other specific legal description, the
description of which has been recorded in the public records of Collier County Florida
on or before June 22, 1999; or 3) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries, for
which an agreement for deed was executed prior to June 22, 1999.
c) Habitat preservation and conservation uses.
d) Passive parks and other passive recreational uses.
e) Sporting and Recreational camps, within which the lodging component shall not exceed
1 unit per 5 gross acres.
22
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
f) Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified in Section 5.a) through
5.e) such as the following: private wells and septic tanks; utility lines, except sewer
lines; sewer lines and lift stations, only if located within non-NRPA Sending Lands, and
only if located within already cleared portions of existing rights-of-way or easements,
and if necessary to serve the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District; and, water
pumping stations necessary to serve the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District.
g) Essential Services necessary to ensure public safety.
h) Oil and gas exploration. Where practicable, directional-drilling techniques and/or
previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native
habitats.
8. Conditional Uses:
a) The following uses are conditionally permitted subject to approval through a public
hearing process:
(1) Essential services not identified above in 4f). Within one year, Collier County will
review essential services currently allowed in the Land Development Code and will
define those uses intended to be conditionally permitted in Sending designated
lands. During this one-year period or if necessary until a comprehensive plan
amendment identifying conditionally permitted essential services, no conditional
uses for essential services within Sending designated lands shall be approved.
(2) Public facilities, including solid waste and resource recovery facilities, and public
vehicle and equipment storage and repair facilities, shall be permitted within Section
25, Township 49S, Range 26E, on lands adjacent to the existing County landfill. This
shall not be interpreted to allow for the expansion of the landfill into Section 25 for
the purpose of solid waste disposal.
(3) Commercial uses accessory to permitted uses 4.a), 4.c) and 4.d), such as retail sales
of produce accessory to farming, or a restaurant accessory to a park or preserve, so
long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use
functions as an accessory, subordinate use.
***
***
***
***
***
***
break ***
***
***
***
***
***
Exemptions from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Development Standards _
The requirements of this District shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing
uses. Existing uses shall include: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior
to June 19, 2002; or projects for which a Conditional use or Rezone petition has been
approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed
application has been submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall
include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with or clearly ancillary to
the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be
consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies and for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District, and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans.
Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's
Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District as long as they do not
result in an increase in development density or intensity.
23
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Provision Analysis:
The RFMUD - its allowance of uses, TDR program, etc. - was created to apply to lands zoned A, Rural
Agricultural. However, there are some lands with non-A zoning, including GC, Golf Course; TTRVC,
Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle; PUD, Planned Unit Development; VR, Village Residential; MH,
Mobile Home; RSF-3, Residential Single Family; C-2, Convenience Commercial; and, C-3,
Intermediate Commercial. For some of these non-A zoning districts, to allow or only allow the uses
and densities of the RFMUD would be in conflict with the underlying zoning district and would grant
additional uses not allowed by underlying zoning or prohibit uses that are allowed by underlying
zoning (e.g. RFMUD Neutral Lands would allow residential and agricultural uses whereas C-2 doesn't
allow those uses and would not allow commercial uses whereas C-2 allows various commercial uses).
To apply the RFMUD regulations to non-A zoning would not only open the County to potential Bert
Harris Act claims, it just wouldn't make sense - the uses of the RFMUD do not correlate to the
development standards of the non-A zoning districts. Similarly, to apply the TDR program to non-A
zoned lands is nonsensical.
The RFMUD Sending Lands originally included only the provision for base TDR credits. However,
via a subsequent GMP amendment, various bonus credits were added. However, in doing so, the
necessary correlating renumbering of cross-references within subparagraphs 7.f. and 8.a.(l) and (3) did
not occur (to change "5" to "7" and "4" to "7," respectively).
The "Exemption" provision at the end of the RFMUD is a grandfathering provision for existing uses.
Part of that provision allows for the expansion of existing uses ("The continuation of existing uses
shall include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with or clearly ancillary to the
existing uses."). This language needs to be revised so as to clearly reflect the intent to allow for on-
site expansion, not expansion onto lands not part of the existing use. Also, the title of this provision
incorrectly refers to development standards whereas the provision itself applies to the RFMUD in its
entirety.
The County recommends the RFMUD be revised to clarify that it only applies to A-zoned lands; to
correct a miss-numbering from a past amendment to the RFMUD Sending Lands designation; and, to
clarify the applicability of "expansion" and delete unneeded text from the Exemption provision title.
Overlays and Special Features, Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay
The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay, depicted on the Future Land Use
Map, is within the boundaries of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan adopted
by the Board of County Commissioners on March 14, 2000. The intent of the redevelopment
program is to encourage the revitalization of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment
Area by providing incentives that will encourage the private sector to invest in this urban area.
This Overlay allows for additional neighborhood commercial uses and higher residential
densities that will promote the assembly of commercial uses and higher residential densities
that will promote the assembly of property, or joint ventures between property owners, while
24
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
providing interconnections between properties and neighborhoods. The intent of this Overlay
is to allow for more intense development in an urban area where urban services are available.
One or more zoning overlays will be adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code
to aid in the implementation of this Overlay. The following provisions and restrictions apply to
this Overlay:
1. Mixed-Use Development: Mix of residential and commercial uses are permitted. For
such development, commercial uses are limited to C-1 through C-3 zoning district uses
plus hotel/motel use. Mixed-use projects will be pedestrian oriented and are
encouraged to provide access (vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle) to nearby residential
areas. The intent is to encourage pedestrian use of the commercial area and to provide
opportunity for nearby residents to access these commercial uses without traveling
onto major roadways. Parking facilities are encouraged to be located in the rear of the
buildings with the buildings oriented closer to the major roadway to promote traditional
urban development.
2. Residential uses are allowed within this Overlay. Permitted density shall be as
determined through application of the Density Rating System, and applicable FLUE
Policies, except as provided below and except as may be limited by a zoning overlay.
3. Non-residential/non-commercial uses allowed within this Overlay include essential
services; parks, recreation and open space uses; water-dependent and water-related
uses; child care centers; community facility uses; safety service facilities; and utility
and communication facilities.
4. Properties with access to US-41 East are allowed a maximum density of 12 residential
units per acre. In order to be eligible for this higher density, the project must be
integrated into a mixed-use development with access to existing neighborhoods and
adjoining commercial properties and comply with the standards identified in Paragraph
#8, below, except for mixed use projects developed within the "mini triangle" catalyst
project site as identified on the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay
Map. The "mini triangle" project site is eligible for the maximum density of 12 units per
acre, with development standards as contained in the Gateway Triangle Mixed Use
District zoning overlay, adopted February 28, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06-08), and amended
December 14,2006 (Ordinance No. 06-63). For projects that do not comply with the
requirements for this density increase, their density is limited to that allowed by the
Density Rating System and applicable FLUE Policies, except as may be limited by a
future zoning overlay.
5. Properties with access to Bayshore Drive, are allowed a maximum density of 12
residential units per acre. In order to be eligible for this higher density, the project must
be integrated into a mixed-use development with access to existing neighborhoods and
adjoining commercial properties and must comply with the standards identified in
Paragraph #8, below. For projects that do not comply with the requirements for this
density increase, their density is limited to that allowed by the Density Rating System
and applicable FLUE Policies, except as may be limited by a future zoning overlay.
6. For parcels currently within the boundaries of Mixed Use Activity Center #16, land uses
will continue to be governed by the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict. A zoning
overlay may be developed for these properties within the Mixed Use Activity Center to
provide specific development standards.
7. Existing zoning districts for some properties within the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Overlay allow uses, densities and development standards that are
inconsistent with the uses, densities and development standards allowed within this
Overlay. These properties are allowed to develop and redevelop in accordance with
25
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
their existing zoning until such time as a zoning overlay is adopted which may limit
such uses, densities and development standards.
8. To qualify for 12 dwelling units per acre, as provided for in paragraphs #4 and #5 above,
mixed use projects within the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay must
comply with the following standards:
a. Buildings containing only commercial uses are limited to a maximum height of three
stories.
b. Buildings containing only residential uses are limited to a maximum height of three
stories except such buildings are allowed a maximum height of four stories if said
residential buildings are located in close proximity to US-41.
c. Buildings containing mixed use (residential uses over commercial uses) are limited
to a maximum height of four stories.
d. Hotels/motels will be limited to a maximum height of four stories.
e. For purposes of this Overlay, each building story may be up to 14 feet in height.
f. For mixed-use buildings, commercial uses are permitted on the first two stories
only.
g. Each building containing commercial uses only is limited to a maximum building
footprint of 20,000 square feet gross floor area.
h. One or more zoning overlays may be adopted which may include more restrictive
standards than listed above in Paragraphs a -g.
9. For all properties outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area, any eligible density
bonuses, as provided in the Density Rating System, are in addition to the eligible
density provided herein. However, for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area
(CHHA), only the affordable-workforce housing density bonus, as provided in-the
Density Rating System, is allowed in addition to the eligible density provided herein.
For all properties, the maximum density allowed is that specified under Density
Conditions in the Density Rating System.
10. A maximum of 388 dwelling units are permitted to be utilized in this Overlay for density
bonuses, as provided in paragraphs #4 and #5 above, for that portion of the Overlay
lying within the CHHA only. This 388 dwelling unit density bonus pool corresponds
with the number of dwelling units previously entitled to the botanical gardens sites
prior to their rezone in 2003 to establish the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD. The "mini
triangle" catalyst project is not subject to this density bonus pool.
11. The Botanical Garden, Inc. properties located in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range
25 East, and shown on the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Map,
shall be limited to non-residential uses except for caretaker, dormitory, and other
housing integrally related to the Botanical Garden or other institutional and/or
recreational open space uses.
Provision Analysis:
This provision is intended to promote redevelopment of this area and remains appropriate. In some
instances, it can be difficult to understand the applicability of the Overlay provisions as it relates to
other FLUE provisions.
26
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
This provision remains valid and appropriate and should be retained. However, the Overlay and/or
related FLUE provisions should be revised to improve clarity, if possible.
Overlays and Special Features, Coastal High Hazard Area
Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the
Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA boundary is depicted on the Future Land Use
Map; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. New rezones to permit
mobile home development shall not be allowed within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement
Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining
to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA.
Provision Analysis:
Certain provisions within the FLUE, e.g. Density Rating System density bonuses and proposed density
reduction factor, specifically do/do not apply within the CHHA. Likewise, certain Objectives and
Policies of other Elements have specific applicability to the CHHA.
This provision remains valid and should be retained as written.
[Comment from the Florida Devartment of Community Affairs' October 15. 2010 Letter on the
Proposed EAR (paragraph 6): "The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section
163. 3191 (2)(m), FS. Collier County has coastal high hazard area; however, the proposed EAR does
not include an evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the coastal high
hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs, and include
in such an evaluation the identification of strategies to address redevelopment and the rights of
affected residents balanced against public safety considerations. The EAR should be revised to
include the evaluation. "
Collier County response:
Collier County has not required a density reduction in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) since
the last (2004) EAR. Further, FLUE Policies 5.1 and 5.9-5.12, and related Consistent by Policy Maps,
allow for development and redevelopment - including within the CHHA - in accordance with zoning
on the identified properties. And, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay in the
FLUE, and on the FLUM, is almost entirely within the CHHA; that Overlay allows for a density
increase on eligible properties therein via reallocation of density.
Objective 3 and Policies in the Capital Improvement Element imposes limitations on the expenditure
of public funds within the CHHA, but allows for provision of public infrastructure necessary to serve
population density as allowed by the FLUE.
Future Land Use Map and Map Series
The Future Land Use Map includes a depiction of the CHHA.
27
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Provision Analysis:
The CHHA is described in CCME Policy 12.2.5. The definition of the CHHA in Florida Statutes
changed in 2006 but that Policy has not been revised. Any necessary change to CHHA boundary
description in CCME policy 12.2.5 needs to be reflected on the FLUM.
The County recommends any changes to the CHHA boundary made in CCME Policy 12.2.5 be
reflected on the FLUM depiction of the CHHA boundary.
Future Land Use Map and Map Series
The Future Land Use Map Series includes a depiction of properties in the Immokalee Area that
are deemed Consistent by Policy.
Provision Analysis:
This map depicts properties within the Immokalee Area Master Plan boundary that were previously
determined to be consistent with the FLUE pursuant to policies under Goal 5 of the FLUE. The
Immokalee Area Master Plan is being amended (petition CP-2008-5) which is expected to result in
fewer future land use nonconformities - properties with existing zoning that does not conform to the
future land use_designation. The lAMP will include a new Policy 6.1.9 that is the replacement of
FLUE Policy 5.1 for the Immokalee area; that new policy will make reference to these nonconforming
properties. A new map will be prepared for adoption into the lAMP depicting these nonconforming
properties that are deemed consistent by policy; this will replace the present Consistent By Policy Map
for Immokalee.
The County recommends this map be deleted; a replacement map will be adopted into the lAMP.
Planning Horizon Issue
Provision Analysis:
The FLUM is labeled 2006-2016; future transportation maps are labeled 2025; other planning and/or
infrastructure programs have different timelines. There is a need to align the planning horizon within
the GMP. The 2007-2008 combined cycles of GMP amendments, adopted on July 28, 20 I 0, added a
new Policy 4.11 in the FLUE, as follows:
In the next Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), due January I, 2011, Collier
County will identify as an issue to be addressed, the need to align dates within the
various elements of this growth management plan. This will include, but may not be
limited to, the planning time frame for the Future Land Use Map, the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay, and Transportation Element long range maps. Necessary
amendments to achieve the alignment of dates will be included in the EAR-based
amendments to the Plan.
28
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
The County recommends revising the various planning horizons to be consistent, perhaps 2025.
Desig nation/DistrictlSu bd istrict Relationsh ip
Provision Analysis:
Both the Urban and AgriculturaVRural Designations contain multiple Districts and Subdistricts.
Various uses are allowed under the Designation that mayor may not be allowed under each subsequent
District or Subdistrict though this is not always readily discernable.
The County recommends clarification of the relationship between Designations, Districts and
Subdistricts; this may necessitate restructuring parts of the Designation Description section of the
FLUE.
EAR BCC - FLUE Assessment of GOPs as approved for DCA on 1-31-11- revised per HFAC 2-10-11
G:ICDES Planning ServiceslComprehensivelDavidl2011 EAR - dwlAdoption docs dw/2-10-11
29
FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Master Plan will be revised to reflect the proper
formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as dermed below:
Goal: General statement defIning what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning
with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specifIc statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction,
such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow
Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Master Plan's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objedive and Policies: The entire Master Plan should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
Goal 1 - reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Objectives and Policies.
Objective 1.1 - reformatting.
Objective 1.3 - reformatting.
Objective 1.4 - reformatting.
Goal 2 - reformatting
Delete related to Goal reformatting. - Objective 2.1, Policy 2.1, Policy 2.1.2, Policy 2.1.3 Policy 2.1.4,
Objective 2.2, Policy 2.2.1, Policy 2.2.2
Goal 3 - reformatting.
Objective 3.1 - reformatting.
Goal 4 - reformatting.
Objective 4.1 - reformatting.
Policy 4.1.1 - delete date reference.
1
GGAMP SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Policy 4.1.2 - delete date reference.
Policy 4.1.3 - delete date reference.
Goal 5 - reformatting.
Objective 5.1 - reformatting.
Objective 5.2 - reformatting.
Policy 5.2.2 - delete date reference.
Policy 5.2.3 - minor revision to show remaining efforts following major project completion.
Objective 5.3 - delete date reference, reformatting.
Goal 6 - reformatting.
Objective 6.1 - reformatting.
Policy 6.1.2 - minor revision to reflect continuing efforts between agencies.
Objective 6.2 - reformatting.
Objective 6.3 - reformatting.
Policy 6.3.1 - delete date reference.
Policy 6.3.2 - delete date reference.
Goal 7 - reformatting.
Objective 7.1 - reformatting.
Policy 7.1.3 - delete date reference.
Objective 7.2 - reformatting.
Policy 7.2.1 - minor revision.
Objective 7.3 - reformatting.
Policy 7.3.1 - delete date reference.
Policy 7.3.4 - delete date reference.
GGAMP - Assessment of Select Provisions -
2
GGAMP SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Estates - Mixed Use District: Conditional Uses Subdistrict - revision to encompass all essential
services uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area and expand the referenced zoning district listed
to encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates.
Estates - Commercial District: Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict - revision to replace the
term "shopping center" with reference to C-2 uses.
3
GGAMP SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Golden Gate Area Master Plan
A. Introduction & Background:
The purpose of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan is defined within its seven Goals (Goal 1 through
Goal 7), which read as follows:
GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING WHILE
BALANCING THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE
CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH
ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL
RESIDENTS.
The Golden Gate Area Master Plan is an "optional element" of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan under Section 163.3177(7), Florida Statutes. As such, there are no specific criteria
to guide the format and purposes of this Element. The Golden Gate Master Plan was originally
developed, as mandated by (1988) Policy 4.1 of the Future land Use Element of the Growth
Management Plan.
As currently formatted, this Master Plan Element consists entirely of seven Goals, and their supporting
Objectives and Policies. This Goal should be retained, essentially as written. This Goal should be
rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC
FACILITY DECISION MAKING THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE
LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF
LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS, WHILE BALANCING THE NEED TO PROVIDE
BASIC SERVICES WITH CONCERNS TO PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES. Revise as
necessary capture what follows in Objectives and Policies.
B. Objectives Analysis:
OBJECTIVE 1.1:
Unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent
with designations outlined on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Golden Gate
Area Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and
Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders effective with the adoption of this
Master Plan. Standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Districts
and Subdistricts are identified in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this
Element.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to follow other portions of
the Master Plan when considering land use changes and issuing development orders. This Objective
should be rephrased to improve its fonnatting as an "objective", and structurally followed with a
Policy or Policies that provide the specific direction.
1
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
Policy Relevance:
There are eight (8) policies within this Objective which should be retained as written.
OBJECTIVE 1.2:
Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service.
Policy Relevance:
There are four (4) policies within this Objective. Only Policy 1.2.4 IS being suggested for
modification.
Policy 1.2.4:
Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely
platted urban area, the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority, or its successor, is
encouraged to expand their sewer and water service area to include all of that area known as
Golden Gate City at the earliest possible time.
This Policy encourages a private utility provider to expand their services to serve all of Golden Gate
City. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. This Policy should
be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "policy".
OBJECTIVE 1.3:
The County shall continue to protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the
Golden Gate area in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and
7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to protect and preserve the
natural resources in accordance with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. This
Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Protect and
preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area; followed by a "policy", such
as:
Policy 1.3.0.1:
The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Golden Gate area in
accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County
Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
Policy Relevance:
There is one (1) Policy within this Objective, which is suggested to be retained as written.
2
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
OBJECTIVE 1.4:
Through the enforcement of the Land Development Code and the housing and building codes,
Collier County shall continue to provide a living environment within the Golden Gate Area,
which is aesthetically acceptable and enhances quality of life.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to provide an aesthetically
acceptable and quality of life enhancing living environment within the Golden Gate Area This
Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Provide a living
environment within the Golden Gate area, which is aesthetically acceptable and enhances the
quality of life; followed by a "policy", such as:
Policy 1.4.0.1:
Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and enhances
the quality of life through the enforcement of the Land Development Code and the housing and
building codes.
Policy Relevance:
There is one (1) Policy within this Objective, which is suggested to be retained as written.
GOAL 2: THE COUNTY RECOGNIZES THAT THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
PROJECT (SGGE), AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM, THAT
AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF STATE ROAD 84 TO US 41, IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT.
This Goal includes outdated locational and project references, and should be rephrased to improve its
formatting as a "goal", such as, TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA wmCH LIES SOUTH OF
INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (EAST TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY
IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION
PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM, BASED
UPON SUCH CONDITIONS THE STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSIDP OF ALL LANDS
WITHIN THE SGGE.
With the State acquisition of the SGGE, the two existing objectives and subsequent policies under the
Goal are no longer relevant and are suggested to be deleted. Below are the existing objectives and
policies to be deleted.
OBJECTIVE 2.1:
Public infrastructure improvements shall be guided by the following policies:
Policy 2.1.1:
Minimal road maintenance to include traffic signage, right-of-way mowing and road surface
patching/grading will continue.
Policy 2.1.2:
3
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
Consistent with the Public Facilities Element, public water and sewer facilities shall not be
expanded into SGGE.
Policy 2.1.3:
Special taxing districts associated with infrastructure improvements shall not be created for or
expanded into SGGE.
Policy 2.1.4
The County shall apply Chapter 28-25, F.A.C., "Boundary and Regulations for the Big Cypress
Area of Critical State Concern" to those Golden Gate Estates units located within the Big
Cypress Area of Critical State Concern.
OBJECTIVE 2.2:
In order to further its goal of protecting this area of special environmental sensitivity, the
County will coordinate with DEP in an effort to assist the State's acquisition of privately owned
property within SGGE to the extent consistent with the recognition of existing private property
rights.
Policy 2.2.1:
The County shall direct inquiries and make information available regarding options for the sale
or donation of land to the State, or other inquiries regarding acquisition, to the Florida DEP,
Bureau of Land Acquisition's designee, as provided by DEP.
Policy 2.2.2:
Collier County shall continue to implement a system for reviewing applications for
development in SGGE, which will include the fOllowing procedures:
A. Notice to the DEP's Bureau of Land Acquisition of the application within 5 days of
receipt.
B. Notice to the applicant of DEP's acquisition program, the lack of public infrastructure
and the proposed restoration program for the area.
C. Within the notice of DEP's acquisition program, the applicant shall be encouraged to
contact DEP's Bureau of Land Acquisition to determine and negotiate whether DEP
intends to purchase the applicanfs property at fair market value.
D. Prior to the processing of an application for development approval, the applicant shall
provide to the County proof of coordination with DEP. Upon execution of a contract for
sale, the application shall be placed in abeyance pending completion of the purchase
by DEP.
E. The County shall review the environmental impacts of the application in order to
minimize said impact.
F. The County shall apply Section 4.02.14, Development Standards and Regulations for
ACSC-ST of the County's Land Development Code or Chapter 28-25, Florida
Administrative Code, "Boundary and Regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical
State Concern", whichever is stricter.
4
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
G. The County shall provide a maximum review and processing time of 180 days from the
date of commencement of the application procedures before any development permits
are issued.
GOAL 3: PROVIDE FOR BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE
RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS,
AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER.
This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO PROVIDE FOR
BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEmCULAR TRIPS, AND
PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER.
OBJECTIVE 3.1 :
The placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates shall
meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates-
Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan
Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to designate and place
Neighborhood Centers in accordance with criteria found in this Master Plan. This Objective should be
rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Meet the locational and rural design
criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates-Mixed Use District, Neighborhood
Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers
within Golden Gate Estates.
GOAL 4: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING EFFORTS WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY SHALL SEEK
TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT
PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE LOCAL RESIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS
OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO PRESERVE AND
ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT PROVIDES
FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE LOCAL RESIDENTS WITIDN GOLDEN GATE
CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
OBJECTIVE 4.1:
Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall focus on the provision of
residential and commercial land uses that meets the needs of the surrounding area.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to provide for residential
and commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area. This Objective should be
rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Provide for residential and
5
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area in the development and
redevelopment within Golden Gate City; followed by a "policy", such as:
Policy 4.0.1.:
Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and
commercial needs of the surrounding area.
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective with modifications suggested for all three.
Policy 4.1.1:
By 2006, Collier County shall develop an implementation schedule for the creation of a
community-planning program for Golden Gate City. The implementation schedule shall take
into consideration the following issues:
a) Affordable housing based upon home ownership;
b) Commercial re-vitalization, to include:
i. Sidewalks
ii. Traffic calming measures
iii. Improved street lighting;
c) Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers;
d) Crime reduction;
e) Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and,
f) Improved lighting for streets and parking areas.
This Policy requires the County to develop a schedule for creating a Golden Gate City community
planning program. Although Golden Gate City is part of a decades-old master planned community,
this Golden Gate Area Master Plan and of the FLUE, this Policy remains relevant to the extent that it
supports a community planning program. The date reference should be deleted.
Policy 4.1.2:
By 2006, Collier County shall begin to examine, by holding community meetings, the feasibility
of establishing neighborhood-based planning programs within Golden Gate City that focus on
the unique or distinct features of the different portions of the community. While focusing on
distinct areas within the community, such neighborhood planning efforts as may be
established shall not neglect Golden Gate City as a whole.
This Policy requires the County to determine the feasibility of establishing neighborhood-based
planning programs in creating a Golden Gate City community planning program. This Policy remains
relevant to the extent that it supports examining optional elements of a community planning program.
As with the Policy above, the date reference should be deleted.
Policy 4.1.3:
By 2006, Collier County shall examine the feasibility of crafting land development regulations
specific to the Golden Gate City community. Such regulations shall focus on the unique
circumstances of this community.
This Policy requires the County to determine the feasibility of creating Golden Gate City community-
specific development regulations. Although Golden Gate City is part of a decades-old master planned
community and platted Subdivision, this Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the FLUE and the LDC, this
6
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
Policy remains relevant to the extent that it supports examining aspects of County regulations that may
recognize the unique circumstances of the community. As with the Policy above, the date reference
should be deleted.
GOAL 5: FUTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES WILL
BALANCE THE DESIRE BY RESIDENTS FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITH THE PRESERVATION
OF THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF
LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, LOW-DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL
USES.
This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO BALANCE THE
DESIRE FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITH THE PRESERVATION OF THE AREA'S RURAL
CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE
ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTMTY, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES.
OBJECTIVE 5.1:
By 2006, the Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide for new
commercial development within Neighborhood Centers.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to amend the LDC to
allow commercial development in Neighborhood Centers located in Golden Gates Estates. This
Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective" with the elimination of the
date.
OBJECTIVE 5.2:
The provision of public infrastructure shall be balanced with the need to preserve the rural
character of Golden Gate Estates.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to give consideration to
the rural character of the Estates in their planning of public infrastructure. This Objective should be
rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Balance the provision of public
infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Golden Gate Estates.
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective with two policies suggested for modifcation.
Policy 5.2.2:
The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department shall create a public network of
greenway corridors within Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and
permanently protected green space. The first segment of greenway shall be in place by 200e.
The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths which allow people to
7
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
move about the Estates Area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be
constructed within existing or future public rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network,
the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings.
This Policy should be revised to provide a connection with the MPO in these planning efforts, and to
ensure consistency with the MPO s Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan. The date reference should be
deleted.
Policy 5.2.3:
Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1-75
interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the
Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further
commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and
Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting
streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment. This Policy shall
not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict,
which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa
Barbara Boulevard.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. The "planned" 1-75
interchange is completed and this planning reference should be deleted.
OBJECTIVE 5.3:
By 2006, the Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended, as necessary, so as to
provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. These provisions
shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots,
the keeping of livestock, and the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density
residential development.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to amend the LDC to
allow rural amenities in Golden Gates Estates. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its
formatting as an "objective" and eliminate the date reference
Policy Relevance:
There are two (2) policies within this Objective with no suggested modifcations
GOAL 6: FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA
SHALL PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK,
WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN
GATE ESTATES.
The above Goal provides for improving the roadway network throughout the Golden Gate area while
preserving its rural characteristics in the Estates areas. This Goal should be rephrased to improve its
formatting as a "goal", such as, TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND
LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE
8
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, IN FUTURE
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA.
[public Comment from February 23. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that it is preferable, in
this context, to divert traffic around the Estates rather than through it.]
OBJECTIVE 6.1:
The Collier County Transportation Division will continue to increase the number of route
alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both east-west and north-south
directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the
preservation of the area's rural character.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective provides for the preservation of the rural character of the Estates and the
consideration of neighborhood traffic safety in planning for the improvements to the roadway network
throughout the Golden Gate area. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an
"objective", such as, Improve existing routes, develop mobility options, and increase the number
of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both east-west and
north-south directions, consistent with traffic safety and efficiency considerations, and consistent
with the preservation of the area's rural character.
Policy Relevance:
There are two (2) policies within this Objective with one policy being suggested for modification.
Policy 6.1.2:
Collier County shall coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to initiate a
study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of 1-75 and Everglades Boulevard.
Coordination between the County and FDOT are ongoing for these purposes. This Policy remains
relevant and should be retained, but re-written to reflect the ongoing nature of these coordinated
planning efforts, such as, The County shaD to continue to coordinate with the Florida Department
of Transportation to implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of 1-75 and
Everglades Boulevard.
[public Comment trom February 23. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting the 1-75 interchange
should not route traffic through the Estates.]
OBJECTIVE 6.2:
For the purpose of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Golden Gate Estates,
shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity, the County will
actively work to increase linkages within the local road system.
Objective Achievement Analysis:
9
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
The above Objective provides for increasing the linkages, or route alternatives, for traffic throughout
the Golden Gate area. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective",
such as, Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on
arterials and major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and
increasing overall road system capacity.
[Plannim! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom December 7. 2010 EAR AdODtion Hearing -
Recommending this Objective and its subsequent Policies be modified to recognize and develop
linkages through an enhanced grid street pattern and an improved street network with new bridge
connections.]
Policy Relevance:
There are three (3) policies within this Objective with no suggested modifications.
OBJECTIVE 6.3:
In planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate
City, Collier County shall coordinate with local emergency services officials to ensure that the
access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles
are met.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective provides for the coordination with emergency services agencies in planning for
the improvements to the roadway network throughout the Golden Gate area. This Objective should be
rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Coordinate with local emergency
services officials in planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates
and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency
management personnel and vehicles are met.
[Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom December 7. 2010 EAR AdoDtion Hearing -
Recommending this Objective and its subsequent Policies (as with Objective 6.2 above) be modified to
recognize and develop linkages through both an enhanced grid street pattern and an improved street
network with new bridge connections.}
Policy Relevance:
There are two (2) policies within this Objective both are suggested for modification.
Policy 6.3.1:
Beginning in 2005, the Collier County Transportation Planning Department shall hold at least
one annual public meeting - with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the
local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the
acquisition of right-of-way for design and construction of road improvements.
This Policy requires the County to meet with emergency service providers and local CIVIC
association(s) at least once each year to address emergency services' needs. The date stated in this
Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted.
10
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
[Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that
consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-
study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removedfrom
the! as a proposed revision.]
Policy 6.3.2:
Beginning in 2005, the Collier County Transportation Planning Department shall coordinate
with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road
improvements related to emergency evacuation needs.
This Policy requires the County to meet with emergency service providers to address emergency
services' needs in prioritizing road improvements. The date stated in this Policy is no longer relevant
and should be deleted.
GOAL 7: THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER GOLDEN GATE
AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, WILL BE PROTECTED
THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND
RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS.
This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal" , such as, TO PROTECT THE
LIVES AND PROPERTY OF RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS
WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE
PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND
RESPOND TO NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS.
OBJECTIVE 7.1:
The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department,
Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate agencies, will continue to
maintain and implement public information programs to inform residents and visitors of the
Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, disaster
situations.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective provides for the protection of residents and the environment by operating public
information programs covering disaster situations. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its
formatting as an "objective", such as, Maintain and implement public information programs
through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department,
Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate agencies, to inform
residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare
for, and cope with, disaster situations.
Policy Relevance:
There are four (4) policies within this Objective with one policy recommended for modification.
Policy 7.1.3:
11
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
By 2005, the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Division
shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any
requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This
evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District
and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services.
This Policy requires the County to meet with emergency service providers to address fire prevention
standards. The date and Department title stated in this Policy are no longer relevant and should be
deleted or revised, while the remainder of this Policy should be retained, essentially as written.
OBJECTIVE 7.2:
Capital improvement projects within the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with all
applicable emergency services providers to ensure that the needs of these entities are
included in the overall public project design.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective provides for the protection of residents and the environment by involving
emergency service providers in capital improvement project planning. This Objective should be
rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Ensure that the needs of all
applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public
project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden Gate Area.
Policy Relevance:
There are two (2) policies within this Objective with one policy suggested for modification.
Policy 7.2.1 :
Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within
the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with the Fire Districts, publiC and private utilities,
Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to
ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained if re-written to identifY the "planners" or
"planning staff" within each of these entities.
OBJECTIVE 7.3:
While the County Transportation Planning Department is in the process of developing
strategies for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the
Estates Area, interim measures to assure interconnection shall be developed.
Obiective Achievement Analysis:
The above Objective provides for the protection of residents and the environment by improving
emergency services through the development of roadway interconnection enhancement strategies. This
Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Develop strategies
through the County Transportation Planning Section of the Land Development Services
12
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
Department for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the
Estates Area and assure roadway interconnection in these areas through interim measures.
{planning Commission (CCPC) Comment trom August 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that
consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a
comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should
be removed from the/ as a proposed revision.]
Policy Relevance:
There are four (4) policies within this Objective with two policies suggested for modification.
Policy 7.3.1 :
By 2006, the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, the Collier County Transportation
Division, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate Federal, State or
local agencies, shall begin establishing one or more of the following routes for emergency
evacuation purposes:
a. An 1-75 Interchange at Everglades Boulevard.
b. Improved emergency access from Everglades Boulevard to 1-75.
c. Construction of a north-south bridge on 23rd Street, SW, between White Boulevard and
Golden Gate Boulevard.
The date stated in this Policy, along with direction to "begin" this task, is no longer relevant and should
be deleted, while the remainder of this Policy should be retained.
[Public Comment from February 23. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that future improvements
include more bridges to reduce fuel consumption and improve safety; Bridging waterways is preferred
over widening roads to 4 or 6 lanes to reduce miles traveled.]
[Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment trom Auwst 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that
consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-
study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removedfrom
the/ as a proposed revision.]
Policy 7.3.4:
Beginning in 2006, County-owned property within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an
active, on-going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from
County-owned properties.
The date stated in this Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, while the remainder of this
Policy should be retained as written.
C. Future Land Use Designation Description - Assessment of Select Provisions
In addition to the above Assessment of GGAMP Goals, Objectives and Policies, staff provides below
an Assessment of select portions of the Land Use Designation Description Section.
2. ESTATES DESIGNATION
13
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
.
A. Estates - Mixed Use District
3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict
Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden Gate
Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the
following four sets of criteria shall be met:
a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions:
Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier
County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except
as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are defined as:
· electric or gas generating plants,
· effluent tanks,
· major re-pump stations,
· sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds,
· hospitals and hospices,
· water aeration or treatment plants,
· governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the
Land Development Code),
· public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and
· public safety service facilities and other similar facilities.
Provision Assessment:
This provision, in varying iterations, has existed in the GGAMP since its adoption in 1991 and remains
appropriate. However, the LDC reference and/or list of uses may not encompass all essential services,
e.g. communication towers which are listed in LDC Sec. 2.01.03 G., Sec. 5.05.09, and in various
zoning districts. Additionally, the reference to the Estates zoning district fails to capture all zoning
districts found in the Golden Gate Estates area, e.g. P, Public Use zoning at Max Hasse Park.
The County recommends revising the LDC reference and/or list of essential services uses to
encompass all essential services uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area, and expanding the
referenced zoning district listed to encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates
and/or adding reference to the Estates Designation.
2. ESTATES DESIGNATION
B. Estates - Commercial District
3. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict
Recognizing the unique development pattern and characteristics of surrounding land uses, the
Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future
Land Use Map. The Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tract 71, Golden Gate
Estates, Unit 23; and the East 165 feet of Tract 54, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. See Randall
Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map.
a) The Criteria for the Subdistrict are as follows:
· All commercial development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD.
14
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
III
· Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer
of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted;
except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required.
· Shared parking shall be required with adjoining developments whenever possible.
b) Limitation of Uses - Uses shall be limited to the following:
. Automobile Service Station;
. Barber & Beauty Shops;
. Convenience Stores;
. Drug Stores;
· Food Markets;
. Hardware Stores;
. Laundries - Self Service Only;
· Post Offices and Professional Offices;
· Repair Shops - Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes;
· Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive-in restaurants
· Shopping Center;
· Veterinary Clinics with no outside kenneling.
Provision Assessment:
The specific list of uses in this subdistrict has existed in the GGAMP since its adoption in 1991 and
was taken from a PUD approved prior to 1991. On April 14, 2009, the BCC approved an Appeal of a
Zoning Verification Letter (Resolution 2009-99) having the effect of allowing all uses of the C-2
zoning district in the LDC at that time, under the term "shopping center."
The County recommends replacing the term "shopping center" with reference to C-2 uses (perhaps,
"All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land
Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended, as of April 14, 2009").
15
GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN
Immokalee Area Master Plan Element
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The Immokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP) is an "optional element," under Section 163.3177(7),
Florida Statutes. As such, there are no specific criteria to guide the format and purposes of this
Element. The Immokalee Area Master Plan was originally developed, as mandated by (1988)
Policy 6.4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
Work on the original Master Plan began with the appointment of a Technical Advisory
Committee in November 1988. An initial public workshop was held in February 1989, and
subsequent informational workshops were held periodically, thereafter. The Collier County
Board of County Commissioners adopted the Immokalee Area Master Plan, as an element of the
County's Growth Management Plan, on February 5, 1991. The first set of amendments to the
plan, involving changes to both the text and the Immokalee Future Land Use Map, were adopted
in 1993.
In 1996, based upon recommendations contained in Collier County's adopted Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR), staff initiated amendments to the Immokalee Area Master Plan. Unlike
the 1988 - 1991 process, the process initiated in 1996 did not involve an advisory committee
specific to the Immokalee Area Instead, the proposed lAMP amendments were formulated and
reviewed by staff, aided by an Evaluation & Appraisal Report Advisory Committee, which also
helped staff formulate and review amendments to other Elements of the Growth Management
Plan. The EAR-based amendments affected virtually the entire Immokalee Area Master Plan,
including the Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map. Various subdistrict boundaries were
revised and two new subdistricts were created. Based upon the EAR recommendations, in
October of 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an Ordinance enacting the revised
Master Plan.
The BCC adopted the Second EAR for the GMP on July 27, 2004. Such EAR called for
revisions to the Immokalee Area Master Plan to be prepared as part of the subsequent County's
EAR-based amendments. During 2003, as part of the preparation of the EAR, the BCC
authorized Comprehensive Planning staff to prepare recommendations for revising the 1997
lAMP. Subsequently, the Board authorized creation of an advisory committee, the Immokalee
Area Master Plan Restudy Committee (Restudy Committee), to work with staff in making
proposed revisions to the lAMP.
The Restudy Committee, assisted by Comprehensive Planning staff, submitted recommendations
to the EAR (for recommended amendments to the lAMP), in November 2003. However, during
the performance of its tasks, the Committee determined that a longer, more intense restudy of the
lAMP was necessary. Therefore, the lAMP Restudy Committee expressed a desire to extend the
life of the Committee so that it could continue to assist the Board with the implementation the
lAMP. The re-established Committee was renamed as the Immokalee Area Master Plan and
Visioning Committee (IMPVC). The BCC adopted Ordinance 04-62, sunsetting the Immokalee
Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and creating the IMPVC, on September 28,2004.
1
Immokalee Area Master Plan
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
One of the Committee's first official acts was to direct staff to prepare Request For Proposals
and Scope of Services to hire a consulting firm that would assist the IMPVC in revising the
lAMP. The eRA hired the consulting firm RMPK Group and worked for a period of over four
years conducting public meetings, collecting and analyzing data, and drafting revisions to the
lAMP. This firm prepared a study entitled "Immokalee Inventory and Analysis Report" in May
of 2006, but relinquished their services to the Immokalee eRA in 2008. RW A, Inc. was then
hired and is presently the agent in charge of the proposed amendments to lAMP and subsequent
Land Development Code (LDC) regulations. The IMPVC sunsetted on December 31, 2009 by
Resolution 2009-306.
A series of public meetings and workshops were held in relation to the preparation of the current
amendment to the lAMP. Agencies involved included the IAMPVC, and Immokalee Community
Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board (CRAAB).
The Immokalee Area Master Plan Element of the GMP is currently in the process of revising and
replacing each existing Goal, Objective and Policy of the lAMP, as well as revising and
replacing all future land use designations on the lAMP and lAMP FLUM. The lAMP is expected
to be adopted during the first quarter of 20 11.
In general, the amendment to the lAMP element ofthe GMP proposes eight new goals, each with
respective objectives and policies; followed by the revised Land Use Designation Description
Section which includes and describes the proposed land use designations that will guide patterns
of development within the Immokalee urban area and further the proposed goals through
standards set forth within such land used designations, and the types of allowed land uses that
could be requested.
The first goal establishes the prioritization of capital projects and other lAMP activities to
accomplish the proposed goals, subject to funding as approved by the Bee on an annual basis.
The second goal prioritizes economic development in regard to opportunities for business and
redevelopment initiatives and incentives that promote social benefits to the lmmokalee
community; encourages development away from environmentally sensitive lands; and allows for
agriculture related business within certain areas of the lmmokalee urban area. The third goal
deals with housing, as it relates to farm worker and migrant housing needs; conservation and
rehabilitation of housing; and the promotion of affordable workforce and gap housing.
Provisions for public infrastructure and public facilities are dealt with in goal four. The fifth goal
outlines standards and policies related to natural resources. Goal six describes the revised land
use designations in Immokalee. Goal seven relates to development design standards that are
specific to the Immokalee Urban area. Goal eight provides for coordination with certain
agencies. The last portion of the revised lAMP specifies the changes among each new land use
designation and the density rating system, including density bonuses and the density and
intensity blending provision, and the applicable correlating revisions to the FLUM.
The proposed lAMP intends to implement the Immokalee community's vision, as approved by
the IMPVC, by promoting economic development and efficient delivery of services through
greater density and intensity that encourage dense, clustered development; incorporating smart
growth principles; and by providing greater development flexibility through mixed-use
Subdistricts.
2
Immokalee Area Master Plan
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
The proposed Plan intends to increase density and intensity as the main mechanism to promote
economic development within the Immokalee Urban Area. Staff acknowledges and supports the
desires of the eRA and IMPVC to promote and diversify economic development in Immokalee.
Specifically:
. Changes in the FLUM proposes the majority of dense, mixed use of commercial and
residential development along the main thoroughfares of Immokalee, surrounded by land
uses that have the highest allowance for density. These higher density areas transition to
lands that are allowed lower density and which are located mainly towards the edge of
the urban area. Industrial development remains in the current general location of the
Immokalee airport.
. Increase in density bonuses for mixed use development are meant to incentivize higher
density along the main thoroughfares, and promote the changes in the land use
designations of these areas that would further the proposed GOPs.
. The proposed FLUM reduces the amount of residentially designated lands by 636 acres.
This change allows for the re-designation of current Low Residential Designated lands
located around the main thoroughfares of Immokalee. Such existing Low Residential
areas are proposed to be re-designated to allow higher density and non-residential uses in
order to further the proposed GOPs and create transition towards the low density areas.
. In addition, some of the changes, such as the location of the Industrial - Mixed Use
Subdistrict (IMU) do not seem to be compatible with the proposed adjacent designations.
However, added development standards, such as specific landscaping buffers between the
industrially designated lands and the residential areas, are meant to ameliorate
compatibility issues between them.
The following are some of the major changes proposed in the lAMP amendment:
. Re-configuration of the wetland boundary that connects to Lake Trafford/Camp Keais
Strand System Overlay (see attached Map 1). This revision was requested by staff.
. The re-designation of the lands within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport
from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO).
. The addition of:l:l 03 acres of land that are proposed to be removed from the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA) and be included within the boundary of the
Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO). (Correlating changes to the countywide
Future Land Use Map Series are not proposed at this time, but will be considered during
adoption hearings.)
. The addition of the "Loop Road," which is proposed to allow access from the Immokalee
Regional Airport and Florida Tradeport areas, to SR82 and SR29.
. Revisions to the land use designations in the lAMP FLUM include:
3
lmmokalee Area Master Plan
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
o An increase in the base density allowed within the mixed use designated areas.
However, no change in base density (DU/ A - dwelling units per acre) is proposed
within the Low, Medium, High and RT designated areas:
· Low Residential: no change (4 DU/A).
· Medium Residential: no change (6 DU/A)
· High Residential: no change (8 DU/A)
· Mixed use: from 12 DU/A allowed within the existing Commerce Center
Mixed Use (CC-MU) and Neighborhood Center (NC) to 16 DU/A allowed
in the proposed Commercial Mixed Use (eMU) designated areas.
· Recreational Tourist (RT): no change (4 DU/A).
o An increase of about 10 percent in the number of potential dwelling units that
could be developed through base density:
· A reduction in the base number of potential dwelling units within the Low,
Medium and High Residential designated areas, from 57,230 dwelling
units to 55,829 dwelling units. This change would allow 1,401 less
dwelling units.
· An increase in the base number of potential dwelling units within the
Mixed-Use designation, from 10,341 dwelling units to 17,670 dwelling
units. This change would allow 7,299 additional dwelling units.
· An increase in the base number of potential dwelling units within the
Recreational Tourist designation, from 1,005 dwelling units to 1,805
dwelling units. The 800 additional dwelling units is due to the increase in
the amount of acreage proposed to be designated as RT in the revised
FLUM.
The above noted reductions and additions in the base number of potential dwelling
units in the lAMP FLUM, in conjunction with the changes in the amount of acreage
of each land use designation, including the increase in acreage of RT designated
lands, yields an increase in the total base number of potential dwelling units, from
68,576 dwelling units to 75,307 dwelling units. This change represents an additional
6,730 dwelling units that would be allowed in the lAMP.
o Changes in the maximum density (DU/A - dwelling units per acre) allowed
within the low residential (reduction) and mixed use designated areas (increase):
· Low Residential: from 12 DU/ A to 8 DU/ A
.
Medium Residential: no change (14 DU/A)
High Residential: no change (16 DU/ A)
Mixed use: from 12 DU/ A allowed within the Commerce Center Mixed
Use (CC-MU) and Neighborhood Center (NC) to 20 DU/A allowed in the
proposed Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designated areas.
Recreational Tourist (RT): no change (4 DU/A)
4
Immokalee Area Master Plan
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
.
.
.
o An 18 percent reduction in the maximum number of potential dwelling units that
would be allowed in the lAMP:
· A reduction in the maximum number of potential dwelling units within the
Low, Medium and High Residential designated areas, from 157,011.4
dwelling units to 113,879.2 dwelling units. This change would allow
43,132.2 less dwelling units.
· An increase in the maximum number of potential dwelling units within the
Mixed-Use designation, from 10,341.6 dwelling units to 22,088 dwelling
units. This change would allow 11,746.4 additional dwelling units.
· An increase in the maximum number of potential dwelling units within the
Recreational Tourist designation, from 1,005 dwelling units to 1,805
dwelling units. This change would allow 800 additional dwelling units due
to the increase in the amount of acreage proposed to be designated as R T
in the FLUM.
The above reductions and additions in the maximum allowed number of potential
dwelling units, in conjunction with the increase in acreage of R T designated lands,
yields a reduction in the total maximum number of potential dwelling units in the
lAMP FLUM, from 168,357.8 dwelling units to 137,774.4 dwelling units. This
change represents a reduction of 30,583.4 dwelling units from what is currently
allowed to be developed in the lAMP.
o An increase in the amount of Recreational Tourist (RT) designated lands: from
:f:251.2 acres to :f:451.8 acres, an increase of :f:201 acres. This change would allow
an increase in the potential number of dwelling units, from 1,005 dwelling units to
1,805 dwelling units (see Table 3); as well as an increase in the maximum amount
of potential dwelling units that could be developed.
o An increase on the cap of allowed density that can be requested within the
Immokalee Urban Area, via density bonus, from a maximum of 16 DU/ A to a cap
of20 DU/A.
o A five percent reduction of residential designated lands. This change of over :f:636
acres of residential designated lands are proposed to be re-designated to allow
commercial and industrial development, as well as uses that are allowed under the
RT designation.
o An increase in the amount of commercial designated lands: from :f:1024.4 acres to
:f: 1,104.4 acres, an increase of :f:80 acres of commercial designated lands.
An increase in the amount of industrial designated lands: from 2,643.5 acres to 3,105.4 acres, an
increase of :f:462 acres of industrial designated lands. This increase includes the re-designation
from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO) of 1484.3 acres of land
that are part of the Immokalee Regional Airport boundary.
The proposed Plan includes Objectives and Policies that address HB 697. The Immokalee Area
Master Plan has incorporated language within these Immokalee-specific amendments to address
the energy efficiency issues. Specifically, the following proposed Goals, Objectives and Policies
are designed to comply with HB 697 in the following manner:
5
Immokalee Area Master Plan
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
Reducing the number and length of automobile trips (VMT):
Objective 2.2, and its related policies, seeks to diversify the local economy and increase
employment opportunities within the Immokalee Urban Area, thereby lowering the need to
travel greater distances for work or services. Objective 4.2 addresses vehicular and non-
vehicular transportation options and specifically references the need to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and minimize energy consumption. Policies 4.2.6 and 4.2.7 discuss the need to
improve and expand public transit options in Immokalee. Policy 4.2.8 seeks to evaluate
whether a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area is appropriate for Immokalee. Policy
6.1.5 specifically states that compact mixed-use development patterns are encouraged to
create walkable communities, reduce vehicle miles traveled and increase energy efficiency.
Promoting alternative modes of transportation:
Objective 4.2 addresses non-vehicular transportation options and specifically references the
need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize energy consumption. Policy 4.2.2
references the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and Policy 4.2.5 recognizes the need to improve
safety for pedestrians and bicycles. Policies 4.2.6 and 4.2.7 discuss the need to improve and
expand public transit options in Immokalee. Objective 7.1 recognizes the need for
Immokalee-specific land development regulations that will encourage pedestrian friendly
urban form and promote energy efficiency. Policy 7.1.2 encourages new community facilities
to be within a half-mile of residential and mixed use centers to encourage walking, bicycling
and non-vehicular travel.
Allowing for compact mixed-use development patterns:
Goal 6, and its related Objectives and Policies, pertain to land use and specifically reference
allowing and encouraging a mixture of uses. Objective 6.1 references the need to coordinate
the Future Land Use Map that encourages desirable growth and energy efficient development
patterns. Policy 6.1.5 specifically states that the Immokalee area encourages compact mixed-
use development patterns to create walkable communities, reduce vehicle miles traveled and
increase energy efficiency. Policy 4.1.2 encourages future parks to be located in the most
densely populated areas, and recognizes the need for public plazas, greens and urban parks to
make Immokalee more pedestrian friendly. Objective 7.1, and its related policies, recognizes
the need for Immokalee-specific land development regulations that will encourage pedestrian
friendly urban form and promote energy efficiency. Policy 7.1.2 recognizes that new
community facilities should be within walking distance to mixed use and residential centers.
Policies 7.1.2, 7.1.3 and 7.1.4 all relate to compact, mixed-use, urban design criteria The
Urban-Mixed Use district allows for commercial development within the Residential
Subdistricts, as described in the Land Use Designation Description section. Density bonuses
are also allowed for projects that are proximate to Commercial Uses.
Allowing for higher densities in appropriate places, which reduces the per capita
carbon footprint, supports transit and reduces sprawl.
Policy 7.1.5 also encourages high intensity development in Immokalee through the
development of a Central Business District overlay subdistrict in the Land Development
Code. The Urban-Mixed Use district and subdistricts, as referenced in the Land Use
Designation Description section, allow for higher residential densities. The base residential
densities range from four (4) units per acre for Low Residential (LR) subdistrict to ten (10)
6
lmmokalee Area Master Plan
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
dwelling units per acre in High Residential (HR) and sixteen (16) in the Commercial-Mixed
Use subdistricts. Density bonuses are also allowed for projects that are proximate to
Commercial Uses or in infill areas, as well as for providing affordable-workforce housing.
The revisions to the lAMP are intended to implement the Immokalee community's vision, as
approved by promoting economic development and efficient delivery of services through greater
density and intensity that encourage dense, clustered development; incorporating smart growth
principles; and by providing greater development flexibility through mixed-use Subdistricts.
[Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment trom Auwst 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Would like to
have the provisions contained in Policy 5.1.4. of the proposed Immokalee Area Master Plan
(IAMP)be resolved during the adoption hearings in regard to this plan. The CCPC also
suggested that in the case that the work related to resolving the provisions of the proposed
Policy 5.1.4. requires further analysis, then the provisions are to be resolved as part of the
adoption hearing of the 2011 EAR.]
[Recommendation from October 14. 2010 South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
Comments to the DCA on Proposed EAR - That the County include a policy that provides a
requirement for detailed design segments and development of funding mechanisms for the
stormwater management improvements identified in the recommended alternatives of the
Immokalee Stormwater Management Plan.]
7
Immokalee Area Master Plan
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all
Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below:
Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with
"TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help
achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such
as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to
specifically require an activity with "shall".
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and
ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall
promote... ", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar
phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction.
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name
changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or
deletions, and grammatical changes.
Objective 1
Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective.
Policy 1.2
Revision to expand focus of policy.
Objective 2
Revision to expand focus of objective
Objective 3
Revision to objective by making this objective number 1, with all policies
under this objective reflecting the change.
Policy 3.1
Policy 3.3
Modification based upon expansion of the policy.
Modification based adding specificity to annual report and eliminating
EDC reference.
Policy 3.8
Revision based upon need to explain what IS the County's traditional
economic base.
Policy 3.9
Deletion based upon redundancy with policy 3.3
Policy 3.14
Relocation of text.
1
Economic Element - Summary
Objective 4
Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective.
Policy 4.1
Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3
into single policy.
Policy 4.2
Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3
into single policy.
Policy 4.3
Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3
into single policy.
2
Economic Element - Summary
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Introduction and Background
The purpose of this Element is to serve as a set of guidelines to assess the impacts of growth
management decisions on the County's economic vitality. The Element also addresses certain
requirements of the Southwest Florida Strategic Regional Plan regarding economic issues.
It must be noted that the Economic Element only encourages, and does not mandate, that the County
consider economic matters in relation to its overall planning and growth management strategy, as
reflected in the other Elements of this Growth Management Plan (GMP). In considering whether to
adopt changes or modifications to the GMP or the Land Development Code, the Board of County
Commissioners must weigh the relative importance of many factors, of which economic impacts are
not always the most significant.
The Economic Element contains a single Goal and six (6) Objective Areas. These Objective Areas
are:
1. The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural & Social
Resources.
2. Expanding and Enhancing the Tourism Industry.
3. New and Existing Industries.
4. Nonprofit and Civic Organizations & Local Groups/Programs.
5. Expansion and Development of Educational Facilities and Programs.
6. Development Regulations.
The below evaluation of the Goal, Objectives and Policies of the Economic Element has been a
collaborative effort between the Collier County Economic Development Council (EDe) and
Comprehensive Planning.
GOAL: COLLIER COUNTY WILL ACIllEVE AND MAINTAIN A DIVERSIFIED AND STABLE
ECONOMY BY PROVIDING A POSITIVE BUSINESS CLIMATE THAT ASSURES MAXIMUM
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WHILE MAINTAINING A IDGH QUALITY OF LIFE.
OBJECTIVE 1 (The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural and Social Resources):
Collier County will encourage the conservation and enhancement of those natural, cultural,
and social resources that represent the foundation of the County's existing retirement,
recreation, and tourist-oriented economy, in order to place the County in a competitive
position to enable the retention and expansion of these and other business opportunities.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be remain.
The County still maintains a position of strengthening the attributes which contributes to its
competitive advantage regarding a sense of place which attracts new working and retired residents, as
well as seasonal residents and short term visitors. The proposed revisions will be to clarify the purpose
of the objective, as proposed below.
OBJECTIVE 1 (The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural and Social Resources): Collier
County will encourage the conservation and enhancement of those natural, cultural, and social resources that are
1
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
integral represent the fOl:lBootioR of to maintaining: and expanding that portion of the County's economy the
County's existing which largely relies on seasonal residents and short term visitors and retired residents.
retirement, particularlv the recreation, hospitality and tourism industries t erientea eeeRomy, in order to place
the County in a the most advantageous competitive position to enahle the retain eRtieft and expand sie&ef these
and other similar or related businesses opportunities.
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - The CCPC felt the
renumbering of the Objectives as suggested by staff was unnecessary.
Policy 1.2: Collier County will support the opportunity for development and establishment of
hospitals, nursing homes and additional medical related facilities in order to promote a
continuum of care to enhance the quality of life throughout the County.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised.
As part of the means to make the County more attractive to a growing aging population, the attention
and support of medical related facilities is essential. To further provide clarification the inclusion of
medical related research and manufacturing facilities. is being proposed to be included within the
facilities promoted.
OBJECTIVE 2 (Expanding and Enhancing the Tourism Industry): Collier County will support
programs that are designed to expand and enhance the tourism industry.
Objective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised.
A central tenant of the composition of the Collier County economy lies within Tourism, not only for
short term economic opportunities that tourist bring to the County, but the continual exposure of the
County to potential new full time and seasonal residents who first experience the County through
tourist opportunities have long term economic ramifications. The objective is being proposed to be
modified by adding the words - "hospitality and the tourism industry"
OBJECTIVE 3 (New and Existing Industries): Collier County will support programs which are
designed to promote and encourage the recruitment of new industry as well as the expansion
and retention of existing industries in order to diversify the County's economic base.
Objective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text remains.
The economic strategy employed by the County is a two prong approach; job creation through
strengthening existing industries as well as active marketing to frrms outside of the local market
through recruitment efforts.
Policy 3.1: Collier County will support efforts to formulate an economic development plan to
assist local organizations in fostering the expansion and diversification of the County's
economic base.
2
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised.
Collier County's financial commitment to the Collier County Economic Development Council is a
direct effort to support and enrich the business environment. Additionally, the BCC recently approved the
position of Economic Development Director to provide additional attention and resources to this critical effort.
Based upon these two factors the policy is being proposed to be expanded as provided below.
Policy 3.1: Collier County will support efforts by the Economic Development Council of Collier County
to formulate aft five-year economic development plan ta assist local organizations in fostering tho to
specifically identify the steps to be taken to achieve expansion and diversification of the County's
economy ic base.
Policy 3.3: Collier County will support the preparation of an annual report on the progress of
economic development in the County.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised.
The preparation of an annual report detailing the economic progress and specifics of existing programs is an
effort which helps provided the business community a wider breadth of understanding of the business
environment fostered by the County and potential opportunities within the County. The policy is being
proposed as modified below.
Policy 3.3: Collier County will support the ation of prepare an annual report on the progress of
economic development and diversification, in the County, specifically as it relates to achievina the
obiectives set forth in the five-year economic development plan referenced in Policy 3.1
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom August 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ
reference to the EDC in the proposed policy.
Remove the
Policy 3.8: Collier County. in coordination with appropriate entities, will continue programs
that encourage and assist in the location of new companies that build on the traditional
economic base.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised.
Attention to the core components of the Collier Economy is a central tenant of the economic platform
endorsed by the County and will continue to be as the County moves forward with its economic
diversification efforts.
Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Would like to see
traditional economic base articulated in policy.
Policy 3.9: Collier County will support the preparation of an annual report on the progress of
existing industry expansions and traditional industry starts.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be deleted.
The policy is redundant, with the annual report provided for in policy 3.3.
3
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Policy 3.14: Collier County has adopted a comprehensive program of economic incentives
that are designed to attract new businesses and develop the local workforce for such
businesses. These incentives include:
a. An impact fee payment assistance program for either new or expanding targeted industries;
b. A job creation investment program for the relocation or expansion of targeted industries;
c. A property tax stimulus program providing payments to offset the costs associated with the
relocation and/or expansion of targeted industries; and,
d. An advanced broadband infrastructure investment program, which provides
payments to businesses that are either installing or expanding broadband
communications systems.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text relocated.
The County has identified the above means to reduce locational barriers faced by firms entering into
the Collier market and will continue to do so in the future and the development of the Project
Innovation initiative is direct evidence of this commitment.
Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUJ?:Ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - remove this policy
and relocate to either the Housing Element or the lmmokalee Area Master Plan.
OBJECTIVE 4 (Nonprofit and Ci~ic Organizations and Local GroupslPrograms): Collier County
will support the economic development goals, efforts and community involvement of nonprofit
organizations, civic associations and local groups and programs.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends be revised.
Support to these groups or organizations are part of the overall support for attempts to bring diversity
and sustainability to the Collier economic mix. The Objective is proposed to be revised to provide
further clarification to it purpose as detailed below.
OBJECTIVE 4 (Nonprofit and Civic Organizations and Local Groups/Programs): Recoanizina the
sianificant economic and social benefits and the overall Qualitv of place attributable in larae part to the
vast array of nonprofit orQanizations. civic and community associations, and other local aroups and
proarams in Collier County and in the southwest Florida region, the County will support the
community involvement efforts and economic development goals of such organizations, associations,
groups and programs. economic development goals, efforts :md community involvement of nonprofit
organizations, civic associations and local groups and programs.
Policy 4.1: Collier County will support the economic development initiatives of regional
nonprofit organizations.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised, as suggested at the
conclusion of policy 4.3.
Successful economic development strategies must understand the economic landscape on a regional
basis to identify and leverage opportunities contained within the region and with that understanding the
county will support such regional efforts.
4
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Policy 4.2: Collier County will support the economic development goals and efforts of
countywide organizations.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text be revised, as suggested at the
conclusion of policy 4.3.
As with policy 4.1 the County understands the importance of local efforts with economic
diversification efforts and will continue to support such organizations.
Policy 4.3: Collier County will support the economic development efforts of localized
organizations.
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text to be revised.
Policy 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 could be combined within one policy as suggested below
Policy 4.1: Collier County will support the economic development; initiatives of regional
nonprofit organizations, goals and efforts of countywide organizations and efforts of localized
organizations.
OBJECTIVE 5 (Expansion and Development of Educational Facilities and Programs): Collier
County will encourage the expansion and development of educational facilities and programs
that complement economic development and diversification.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text remains.
Successful economic development strategies understand the necessity of linking educational
institutions to specific industries to assist within technology transfer and product and process
innovation. Additionally, a strong educational linkage to industry ensures a yearly supply of fresh
talent and ideas for existing business to draw upon and stands as a required infrastructure for a locality
to provide similar to other locational infrastructure requirements.
OBJECTIVE 6 (Development Regulations): Collier County will maintain a system of
development regulations that will promote the accomplishment of the goals, objectives, and
policies of this Element.
Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text remains.
The level of complexity associated with the development regulations of the County must weigh the
protections being sought against the barriers they create for new business starts and existing business
expansion. Attention must be paid to both sides of the balance.
Policy 6.1 Collier County will periodically review its land development regulations for
consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan to promote the accomplishment
of the goals, objectives and policies of this Element.
5
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text remain.
Periodic review of development regulations are required to ensure that unintended negative
consequences, contrary to the GMP's Economic Element are not resulting from such development
regulation.
Planning Commission (CCPc) Comment trom AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Leave policy as
written.
6
ECONOMIC ELEMENT
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
Public School Facilities Element
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper
formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below.
Goal: General statement that defmes what the Element will
ultimately achieve.
Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal;
describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s).
Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to
achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s).
Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department
name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective
and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical
changes.
Policy 2.3:
Delete the last paragraph within the Policy, as the required school
concurrency regulations were adopted within the Land Development Code
in June 2010.
Policy 2.5:
Delete the Policy, as the required school concurrency regulations were
adopted within the Land Development Code in June 2010.
Policy 3.6:
Revise the Policy to reflect the establishment of the Citizen Advisory
Group (CAG); and, add a reference to reflect that the planning and
monitoring of school concurrency by the CAG is ongoing.
1
PSFE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
Assessment of the Successes and Shortcomings
and Recommendations
for the Public School Facilities Element
A. Background and Introduction
In 2005, the Florida Legislature enacted legislation (Senate Bill 360) amending Sections
163.3177 and 163.3180, F.S., requiring the establishment of concurrency for public school
facilities not granted an exception. The implementation of school concurrency requires local
governments to establish level of service standards for concurrency for public schools and adopt
a Public School Facilities Element into their comprehensive plans.
In 2008, in response to this legislative requirement, the Collier County School Board, Collier
County and the municipalities within the County, coordinated the adoption of the Public Schools
Facilities Element along with amendments to the Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital
Improvements Elements to ensure consistency among the local governments' comprehensive
plan elements and the School Board's plans.
The Public Schools Facilities Element implements a uniform, district-wide public school
concurrency system requiring concurrency for public schools be met before development orders
are issued.
The Collier County School District has a current enrollment of 42,849 students in grades pre-
kindergarten through twelfth grade based on the school enrollment census taken in October 2009.
The Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for existing core facilities can serve
48,257 students. The District reports that by year 2019, the projected student enrollment
numbers are expected to grow to over 49,800 students. In order to meet the district-wide level of
service standard of 100 percent for high schools, and 95 percent for both elementary and middle
schools, within the five year planning horizon, an elementary school expansion to add 162 seats
is planned and programmed within the District's Five-Year Work Plan. The Collier County
School District currently meets the adopted level of service standards for public school facilities.
School concurrency capacity projects identified in the School District's Five-Year Work Plan do
not require Collier County to provide capital improvements for those projects within the five-
year planning period. Based on student enrollment projections and the elementary school
expansion planned and programmed in year 2014/2015, Collier County will continue to meet the
adopted level of service standards for public school facilities for the five-year planning period.
B. Element Review
Less than two years have passed since the Public School Facilities Element was adopted. During
that time period the County experienced a decline in residential development and an
1
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
outmigration of its population. As a result, school facility construction lessened and projects
planned within the School District's 5- Year Capital Improvement Plan were moved into later
planning years. Since the school concurrency program generally remains unchanged since its
adoption, the County is proposing minimal changes to PSFE at this time. Proposed changes to
the Element include: deleting a paragraph within Policy 2.3 and deleting Policy 2.5 to reflect the
adoption of implementing school concurrency provisions within the Land Development Code in
June 2010; and, revising Policy 3.6 to reflect the establishment of a Citizen Advisory Group and
provide that the planning and monitoring of school concurrency by the CAG is ongoing.
c. Objective Analysis
OBJECTIVE 2: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
The County, in cooperation with the School District, shall ensure a school concurrency
evaluation is performed on all non-exempt residential development to verify that new
students can be accommodated within the adopted level of service standard established
for each school type as measured within a CSA.
[This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
Policy 2.3:
The County, through its land development regulations, and in conjunction with the
School District, shall establish a school concurrency review process for all residential
development projects that are not exempt under Policy 2.2 of this Element. The following
are the minimum review process requirements for all non-exempt residential
development:
A. Submittal of a residential development application including a School Impact
Analysis (SIA) to the County for sufficiency review.
B. Determination of completeness by the County. If deemed complete, the County
shall transmit the application, including the SIA, to the School District for
review.
C. Review of the application, by the School District, for available capacity, and
issuance of a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) within
20 days after receipt of a complete application from the County.
The School District shall identify the following in the SCADL:
1. Available capacity within the affected CSA.
2. If capacity is not available within the affected CSA, the available capacity
within one or more of the adjacent CSAs. (If the affected CSA does not
contain a particular school type (elementary, middle, high), the adjacent
CSAs shall be evaluated for available capacity.)
2
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
3. If capacity is not available in the adjacent CSAs, the School District shall
indicate that the development is not in compliance with the adopted LOSS
and offer the applicant the opportunity to negotiate a mitigation plan within
a 90 day period.
The Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency
and this Public School Facilities Element shall provide the process necessary to
determine available school capacity for all residential projects that are not exempt under
Policy 2.2 of this Element, until such time as land development regulations (LDRs) are
adopted. In the event that one of the documents listed above is not in effect prior to LDR
adoption, the other document shall provide the process necessary to determine available
school capacity for all non-exempt residential projects.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the last paragraph should be
deleted, as this policy objective has been achieved with the adoption of Land Development Code
regulations in 2010.
Policy 2.5:
Within one (1) year from the effective date of the School Concurrency Growth
Management Plan amendments, the County shall adopt school concurrency provisions
into its Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to implement school concurrency.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The Policy objective has been achieved with the adoption of Land Development Code
regulations in 2010.
This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted.
OBJECTIVE 3:
The County and the School District will: coordinate the location of public schools with the
Future Land Use Map and map series to ensure that existing and proposed school facilities
are located consistent with existing and proposed residential areas they serve and are
proximate to appropriate existing and future land uses, and serve as community focal
points; coordinate the location of public school facilities relative to the location of other
public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible;
coordinate existing and planned public school facilities with the plans for supporting
infrastructure; establish a monitoring group; and address coordination on emergency
preparedness issues.
Public Comment (Community MeetinJ! held on 3/15/10).-
Public stated that there is a need to coordinate school siting and facility planning with County
infrastructure.
[This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed]
3
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
Policy 3.6:
The County, in conjunction with the School District, shall establish a Citizen Advisory
Group (CAG) to monitor planning and school concurrency in Collier County.
Policy Achievement Analysis:
The policy objective has been achieved with the establishment of the CAG in 2009.
This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to
reflect the establishment of the Citizen Advisory Group and that the monitoring and planning of
school concurrency, by the CAG, is an ongoing activity.
4
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
Chapter
Three
.
aJor
. Issues
12/83/2889 16: 18 8584883389
CDM A..AI+/IN3
PAa:: 82/85
./
.
ST1.TI! OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
.Oedic.,ed to making Florida a better pl.ce 10 ca'l home.
CfWILIECRCT
cao..or
ntOIIQ G. fll&JfAM
....,
Deamber 4,2009
Mr. JtandaJl J. Cohen. AICP
DiNctorOf~D..=
~~~
NapJc:s. Florida 34104-
RB: Comer County Evalullion AppnisIl Report
Let1I:r oflJuck:rs1mtdina.
Dear Mr. Cohen:
The DepartD.k4l has reeeivecI your letter dated NOvmlber 24. 2009. whidI outliftes a.
~ iIIUCS that Collier County win focus on for the EvaluItion and AppmisaI Report (EAR) of
Ibe County., CompreJIensive Plan. Thia Jetter IIeI'VeS U the Depadment's c:onfinnIticm Cbat the
i-.- idc:nti.fied in your lea. ~ the natOI' isa1a OIl ....ilich Collier County will focua. (am
confident chat the EAR will contIia a compt'daensi\'C UIIUSJ1lOdt 11I4 ovaluatloJl oCtile
sdJ'MlftDIII'o(tbe County's ComprehenRve Plm in achieving Ihe pia related to the major
issues. u wi. u idcntilYins the n~1tJ EAR-bBs:ed amendments for aclainina thole pis.
w. look farwIftI to coatimiins to provfde tedmicalllliltance to the Couoty durina the
EAR. prQCeSI. ICyou. have lilY questions reprdiDg this matter or if_mIJ be off\Jrther
...~ · you proceed with the EAR. pJeIIIiC CODtId 9mlda Wianinp., .RqponaJ Planning
Administrator. tit (ISO) 487-4545, or Scott Rogerr.. .Senior Plenner.1It (I.sO) 922-1758.
Siaecrd)' )lOurs,
CGlsr
~~
Chmies Gauthier, AICP
Director. Division or Community P1annins
. At18dunenf: Comer letter urNoveJnber 24. 2009
cc: The Honorable Don.. ...181.. Ch&dnnan. ColIictCounty ao.ct ofCoumy Commllllonen
II" 'HUMARD OAIC .OULIVARD . TALLA"AI..'. FL aUII.III.
1500411....8 fll) . ',O.'Zt.071t (f) . W.hit., "".!II de. ~..t. II IU
· ~......... t!lII.~""Jt/ ~...
· ~...--.,.--.~ 'I!ll_;-...~ lI!t)omMnlft It
Collier County Evaluation and Appraisal Report
List of Major Issues
1. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
As part of its growth management program the County has adopted a variety of measures to
ensure that infrastructure is available when needed to support new development/redevelopment
and that such development pay its fair share. These measures include adopted Level of Service
Standards. a concurrency management system. impact fees. permit and services fees,
proportionate-fair share ordinance, direct cost accounting and a Five-Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements to program the timely construction of needed public facilities. The EAR will
include a series of interrelated evaluations of the actions taken by the County and
recommendations regarding changes needed to better achieve community-planning objectives.
The EAR will evaluate the effectiveness of the concurrency management measures in achieving
and maintaining the adopted level of service standards and ensuring that infrastructure is
available when needed to support development and that development pays for growth related
impacts.
2. CLIMATE CHANGE
The EAR will evaluate the policies and objectives within the GMP for their effectiveness towards
promoting reductions in vehicle miles traveled and corresponding reduction in green house gas
emissions.
3. URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
The EAR will evaluate the objectives and policies of the GMP for their effect upon the pattern
and timing of urban development throughout the County. The EAR will evaluate the effectiveness
of the urban boundary line and policies related to urban areas in ImmokaIee.
4. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION
Evaluate the County's watershed management planning and floodplain management programs
and existing criteria to determine the degree to which related planning objectives have been
achieved.
5. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
Assess the ongoing coordination between Collier County and surrounding local governments,
other governmental agencies, and special districts, and assess the effectiveness of the objectives
and policies of the plan and determine if any deficiencies exist or modifications are required. The
EAR will evaluate the effectiveness of the intergovernmental coordination related to the planning
and provision of potable water.
6. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The EAR will evaluate how successful the County has been in providing affordable housing
during the previous implementation period, the status of available affordable housing in the
County and determine if any modifications to the GMP are necessary.
7. RURAL LANDS STEWARDSHIP AREA OVERLAY
The EAR will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan in achieving
the plan objectives and policies associated with the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.
8. RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT
The EAR will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan in achieving
the plan objectives and policies associated with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
Water Resource Protection
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the GMP for their effect on managing water
resource protection throughout the County by promoting mechanisms to protect the County's
estuarine and wetland systems.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
Subsection 163.3177 (5)( d), Florida Statutes requires all local governments within the State of
Florida to have. as part of their respective Local Government Comprehensive Plans, an Element.
dealing with "the conservation, use. and protection of natural resources in the area, including air,
water, water recharge areas, wetlands, water wells, estuarine marshes. soils, beaches, shores,
flood plains. rivers. bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine habitat, minerals,
and other natural and environmental resources."
The statute further relates the functions of the Conservation and Coastal Elements so that, in
effect, local governments in designated coastal areas, such as Collier County. are required to
prepare a Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which fulfills the requirements for
both Elements. Accordingly. Collier County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element is
divided into thirteen (13) separate goal areas. These may be summarized as follows:
1. Protection of natural resources;
2. Protection of surface and estuarine water resources;
3. Protection of groundwater resources;
4. Protection of freshwater resources;
5. Protection of mineral and soil resources;
6. Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat;
7. Protection of fisheries and wildlife;
8. Maintenance of existing air quality;
9. Management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes;
1 O. Protection of coastal resources;
11. Protection of historic resources;
12. Hurricane evacuation and sheltering; and
13. Avoiding duplication of regulations.
Collier County is a large land area of approximately 2000 square miles in southwest Florida.
The topography is extremely flat ranging from a high elevation of approximately forty (40) feet
above sea level in the unincorporated community of Immokalee in the northeastern portion of the
County to the back of a low coastal dune system at approximately four (4) feet at the coastline
along the western and southern portions of the County. The typical ground slope is
approximately one (1) foot per mile in the western half of the County and less than that in the
eastern half of the County. Additionally the area receives an average rainfall of about 53 inches
with 37 inches during the wet season (June through October). Due to the lack of relief, abundant
rainfall. highly permeable soils. and proximity to sea level the ground water table is very close to
1
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 20 J 1 Bee Adoption
the ground surface. The flat topography results in large areas of sheetflow across natural ground,
but canals, road construction, agricultural operations, and urban development have greatly
altered this sheetflow in the western portion of the County.
Collier County, due to the Immokalee Ridge in the northeast, is basically its own drainage
watershed. The shallow topography, with the Immokalee Ridge located in the northeastern
portion of the County near the Lee County and Hendry County boundaries, creates a series of
drainage basins with very little exchange of stormwater crossing County lines. Additionally. in
some locations agricultural and development activities have constructed earthen berms along
their property lines that correspond to the County lines that further define the drainage basin
boundaries. The eastern half of the County is predominantly federally owned wetlands that
receives sheet flow as a part of the Everglades system, but this remains in the eastern half of the
County and continues the flow in a southwesterly direction.
Due to the low gradient terrain and wetland hydrologic features, construction of canals along
section lines and roads, drainage is not uniform and implementation of a uniform level of service
for flood conveyance in all areas of Collier County is not feasible. The County generally
considers a 25-year 3-day rainfall event as the design storm for area west of Collier Blvd. (CR-
951) and a 10-year I-day rainfall event as the design storm for the Golden Gate Estates areas east
of Collier Boulevard (CR 951).
Because the soils are so porous the canals drain preserves and shallow aquifers as well as
residential developments. The shallow aquifers are utilized by suburban and rural residents for
potable water. Additionally the large fresh water discharges, contributed from the development
of the county. during the wet season have been found detrimental to the estuaries. For these
reasons there have been many adjustable water level controls installed in the canal systems to
improve functionality.
The development of Watershed Management Plans and interim regulations is specified in the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Objective 2.1 of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan, as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on 1-25-07
(Ordinance 2007-16). The Florida Department of Community Affairs reviewed all amendments
to the CCME. including the addition of these "interim standards" and on 5-2-07 issued their
Notice of Intent to fmd the CCME amendments "in compliance" with Florida Statutes. After the
21-day challenge period ended without a challenge being filed, the amendments to the CCME
became effective on 5-24-07.
The interim standards require a new development and re-development projects shall meet 150%
of the water quality volwnetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for
Environmental Resource Permit Applications (February 2006) and the retention and detention
requirements, and the allowable offsite discharge rates required by Drainage Sub-element Policy
6.2 and 6.3. respectively. The 150% water quality volwnetric requirement also applies to the
County's minimwn requirement of one (1) inch under Ordinance 90-10. as amended; thus
increasing the County's minimwn requirement to one and one-half (1.5) inches.
2
Water Resource Protection
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
WMP Watersheds - FDEP Everglades West Coast Watersheds
Legend
FOEP Ewe Watersheds
Marco Eeat"!
MartGI-sQnd
Nap!es
Naples Buth
OfrAil!oiicochee.SR29
:::. e...:..........B. :." B",,~ [/
Ten Thousend ':J
i
)
f)tIf:~ Source: Basins I VlMershed . fDEP
CreatedS" GIS CDES/Er.vro!'lmBrnl Services
G:\6~S...Tmp\\Mttershf.!d\CC _eAC _ V.sdP. mxd
g~!~11~tetshed\CC_E'~~_ VksdP.pg
I
o
3
I
6
I
12 Miles
,,~
1
cottier County
Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be
3
l1/ater Resource Protection
Upda{edfiJr January 2011 Bee Adoption
compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and
within or adjacent to the impacted wetland.
Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated
flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by
the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of November 17, 2005.
Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically
inundated by intense rainfall or sheetflow conditions.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
The Collier County Growth Management Plan addresses the need to complete the prioritization
and begin the process of preparing Watershed Management Plans, which is to contain
appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The process
consist of (1) an evaluation of areas for which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary
based on current or past watershed management planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available
data and information that can be used in the development of Watershed Management Plans, and
(3) budget authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed Management Plan. A funding
schedule is established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by
2010. In selecting the order of Plan completion, the County shall give priority to watersheds
where the development growth potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of
wetland and listed species habitats. The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the
Federal and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Until the
Watershed Management Plans are completed, The County shall apply the interim standards for
development.
As described in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, Watershed Management Plans (WMPs)
are to serve as a watershed management tool to guide future development - they are to "protect
the County's estuarine and wetland systems." They are to help identify areas where state
standards are not currently met and to develop strategies to help meet them in the future. They
are also to identify water management strategies appropriate to each drainage basin that can be
used to guide development, land use changes, and mitigation within that basin.
The County's Watershed Management Plan that is being developed will help protect estuaries
and wetland systems to:
. Restore historical water quantity and estuarine discharges.
. Improve water quality within watersheds and estuaries.
. Address flood control and water supply issues
Below are the public comments received related to Water Resource Protection:
WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION
.
County should re-evaluate monitoring and maintenance procedures for nutrient
loads/pollution/water quality. Objective 1 of the Drainage Sub-Element
4
Water Resource Protection
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
.
Improve public participation outreach and involvement for watershed management planning.
ObservationaL
The County needs better outreach and education with user-friendly terminology and use
illustrations. ObservationaL
The County Watershed Management Planning needs to be holistic - more than just water.
ObservationaL
With a fii.ture unpredictable climate we cannot depend on previous historical levels of water.
ObservationaL
Develop new tools to predict future water availability. Policy 1.3 of Potable Water Sub-
Element
GMP elements need to consider the effects they have on each other and; Available water
supply; Waste Management (Landfills); and Drainage. ObservationaL
If and when sea levels rise, what has the BCB done to keep water in the Eastern Collier area
fresh and apart from encroaching seas? Observational- Major Issue - Climate Change.
The County has let the residents down by acquiescing in the FIRM. ObservationaL
The County has failed to provide guidance to the people who will need a LOMA.
Programmatic.
The County has failed to limit growth based on available resources. Objective 2 (Financial
Feasibility) Capital Improvement Element
The County has failed to consider the cumulative effict of deep aquifer withdrawal.
ObservationaL
The County has failed to develop a County-wide Storm Water Plan. Objective 2.1
Conservation and Coastal Management Element
Canals not cleaned (algae and weeds cover canal along Frangipani Ave.) Algae sheet sunk
(causing future problems for fish and drainage). Programmatic.
C Z connector has better flow due to culverts being installed ObservationaL
FEMA elevations too large a burden during severe recession. ObservationaL
Need more efficient water management of rural areas east of CR951 to prevent flooding and
being rezoned to flood area. ObservationaL
The new Flood Insurance is unacceptable. ObservationaL
The County should protest FIRM. ObservationaL
If flooding is a problem, don't allow additional buildings and asphalt (which can impact
their neighbors). ObservationaL
Ditches and swales are not being cleaned and cleared; and driveways do not have proper
culverts. Programmatic.
Standing water only 3 times ('95, '06 and '08) the same time the county took readings.
ObservationaL
County Government has failed to implement the Watershed Management Plan into which all
other Construction and Coastal Elements, Goals and Objectives were to be involved
Observational- Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
Water Resource Protection
Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption
· Disappointed with County's failure to put the '89 GMOP LDC into place in a timely manner.
ObservationaL
· County has failed to address sustainability and quality of life for all resources.
Observational
· The '89 GMP required that all aspects will be evaluated, watershed by watershed, where is
that guidance? Observational - Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management
Element.
· All development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated after
each watershed and its characteristics were developed. Objective 2.1 Conservation and
Coastal Management Element.
· Failed to put into place a Watershed Management Plan. Objective 2.1 Conservation and
Coastal Management Element.
· Dropping water table in GG Estates, GG Estates water resources are being used by City and
other areas without benefit to GG Estates. ObservationaL
· Re-use water - can it be turned into a drinking water source? Potential waste of re-use
water is a concern (If there is no demand, why pay for treatment?) Policy 1.1 Potable Water
Sub-Element.
· County has no Flood Plain Management Plan. Policy 6.3 Drainage Sub-Element.
· No coordination with Big Cypress Basin; SFWMD; FEMA and DEP (ex: - Picayune Strand
Restoration project was completed without consideration of the effect of the RLSA on the
flood plain). ObservationaL
· Where are the Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan and the Comprehensive Water
Resource Management Plan? Policy 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element.
· When are the efforts going to be: Funded; Delivered; and Scheduled ObservationaL
· Where is monitoring and maintenance of water resource? Potable Water and Drainage Sub-
Elements.
· Watershed/Water Resource Management needs to be holistic. Observational.
· Environment/Development/ConservationlRecharge/Recycle/Reuse/ Alternative Water
Resources ObservationaL
· The County needs to establish a Stormwater Utility fee to address needed improvements and
to address EP A 's implementation of the NNC (Numeric Nutrient Criteria). Observational &
Policy 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element.
The following pages documents is a summary of related GOPs that addresses watershed
planning and which serve as the premise of the current County's effort in addressing water
resource protection.
6
Water Resource ProtectioneUpdated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Water Resource Protection
The following is a partial excerpt of Goals Objectives and Policies from the Collier County
Growth Management Plan that address watershed planning issues.
Introduction
Subsection 163.3177 (5)( d), Florida Statutes requires all local governments within the State of
Florida to have, as part of their respective Local Government Comprehensive Plans, an
Element, dealing with "the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area,
including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, water wells, estuarine marshes, soils,
beaches, shores, flood plains, rivers, bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine
habitat, minerals, and other natural and environmental resources."
The statute further relates the functions of the Conservation and Coastal Elements so that, in
effect, local governments in designated coastal areas, such as Collier County, are required to
prepare a Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which fulfills the requirements for
both Elements. Accordingly, Collier County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element is
divided into thirteen (13) separate goal areas. These may be summarized as follows:
1. Protection of natural resources;
2. Protection of surface and estuarine water resources;
3. Protection of groundwater resources;
4. Protection of freshwater resources;
5. Protection of mineral and soil resources;
6. Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat;
7. Protection of fisheries and wildlife;
8. Maintenance of existing air quality;
9. Management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes;
10. Protection of coastal resources;
II. Protection of historic resources;
12. Hurricane evacuation and sheltering; and
13 . Avoiding duplication of regulations.
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
January 25, 2007
Policy 1.3.5:
Where possible, the implementation of the NRP A program shall be coordinated with the
preparation and implementation of watershed and sub-basin management plans.
GOAL 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROTECT ITS SURFACE AND ESTUARINE
WATER RESOURCES.
Objective 2.1:
By January 2008, the County shall complete the prioritization and begin the process of preparing
Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's
estuarine and wetland systems. The process shall consist of (1) an evaluation of areas for which
Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on current or past watershed management
7
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available data and information that can be used in the
development of Watershed Management Plans, and (3) budget authorization to begin preparation
of the first Watershed Management Plan by January 2008. A funding schedule shall be
established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by 2010. In
selecting the order of Plan completion, the County shall give priority to watersheds where the
development growth potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of wetland and
listed species habitats. The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the Federal and
State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Until the Watershed
Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the following as interim standards for
development:
a. All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality
volumetric requirements of Section 52.1(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental
Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District
(February 2006) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable offsite
discharge rates required by Drainage Sub-element Policy 6.1 and 6.3, respectively;
b. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be
compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site
and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland.
c. Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the
designated flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate
Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of
November 17,2005. Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas
known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheetflow conditions.
d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to
determine impacts to natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs. For this particular
evaluation, natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified as
contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet facultative plant
species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the natural wetland,
flowway, or slough at least one (1) foot lower than the ground at the edge of the natural
wetland, flowway, or slough. The edge of the natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs
shall be identified by field determination and based upon vegetation and elevation
differences from the adjacent uplands or transitional wetlands. The County shall require
the applicant to avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or,
when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by
providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact. The County shall
adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 2001-27,
adopted May 22,2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and
provided basin delineations where special peak discharge rates have been established.
The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the Watershed Management
Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings of the Watershed
Management Plans.
e. All new development and re-development projects shall ensure surrounding properties
will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on stormwater sheet flow.
f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all
development projects to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental permits.
8
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
',;j,
g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land
development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future development or
re-development projects. Best Management Practices means structural and nonstructural
facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution either through source control or
treatment of stormwater.
Figure 1. Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.1.d is
Applicable [See Figure I following CCME text]
9
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
Policy 2.1.1:
These Plans will evaluate activities in the watersheds that drain into the estuaries in order to
evaluate cumulative impacts on the estuarine system as well as impacts within the watersheds
themselves.
Policy 2.1.2:
The Plans will provide for various tasks such as monitoring land-disturbing activities in the
watersheds, collecting canal flow and water quality data, stormwater quality data, and assessing
habitat changes.
Policy 2.1.3:
The Plans will also evaluate structural and non-structural controls for restoring historical
hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where possible and for reducing the impacts of canal and
stormwater discharges to estuaries.
Policy 2.1.4:
All Watershed Management Plans shall address the following concepts:
a. Appropriate wetlands and uplands serving as a buffer to wetlands are conserved;
b. Drainage systems do not degrade wetland and estuary ecosystems;
c. Surface water that potentially could recharge ground water is not unduly drained away;
d. When feasible the extent and effects of salt-water intrusion are lessened;
e. The timing and flow of fresh water into the estuaries from the watershed shall, as a
minimum, not degrade estuarine resource value;
f. The needs of the watershed's natural resources and human populations are balanced;
g. The effects on natural flood plains, stream channels, native vegetative communities and
natural protective barriers which are involved in the accommodation of flood waters;
h. Non-structural rather than structural methods of surface water management should be
considered first in any proposed new works;
i. Wetland and estuarine habitat functions are conserved and/or enhanced; and
j. Wetland and estuarine ecosystems will be conserved and/or enhanced using a variety of
innovative tools, including landowner incentives, public acquisition, conservation easements,
and/or transferable development rights.
Policy 2.1.5:
Upon establishment of the various Watershed Management Plans for Collier County, all
environmental data collection, environmental management and environmental planning
a. activities conducted by Collier County shall be conducted using a basin-by-basin
approach.
Policy 2.1.6:
Until the completion and adoption of individual watershed management plans, promote water
management permitting on a basin by basin approach.
Policy 2.1.7:
Collier County shall take the lead and promote intergovernmental coordination between the
County and other governmental agencies involved with watershed planning, including, but not
10
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
necessarily limited to, the municipalities of Marco Island, Naples and Everglades City, the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the South Florida Water Management District,
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other governmental agencies. The County will take the lead
and oversee the preparation of the necessary watershed management plans, and will rely upon
the work performed or data collected by other agencies, to the extent that these agencies have
data and/or experience, which may be useful within the watershed basin planning and
management process.
OBJECTIVE 2.2:
All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable Federal,
State, or local water quality standards.
Policy 2.2.1:
Wastewater treatment plants shall not be allowed to discharge directly to rivers, canals
or jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives and Policies of this
Element.
Policy 2.2.2:
In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run-off, stormwater systems
should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and
an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity and quality of fresh water to the estuarine
system. Non-structural methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged.
Policy 2.2.3:
Chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme caution. The use
of appropriate biological and mechanical (use of harvesting equipment to remove vegetation)
controls in both the canal system and stormwater detention ponds is encouraged.
Manufacturers and EP A guidelines for chemical use in aquatic habitat will be followed.
Policy 2.2.4:
Continue and expand when needed the existing water quality monitoring program for sampling
canals and rivers and assess the data annually.
Policy 2.2.5:
By December 31, 2008, and no less than every three years, stormwater management systems
shall be inspected and certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for compliance with
their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected.
OBJECTIVE 2.3:
All estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state and local water quality standards.
Policy 2.3.1:
No new untreated point source discharge shall be permitted directly to the estuarine system or
rivers or canals that flow into the estuarine system.
11
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Policy 2.3.2:
Stormwater systems discharging directly to estuaries shall be designed to meet the same
requirements as stated in Policy 2.2.2.
Policy 2.3.3:
All watershed basin modification activities shall include appropriate detention and retention
criteria, consistent with the rules and regulations of the South Florida Water Management
District, Big Cypress Basin Board and Collier County, as may be applicable.
Policy 2.3.4:
Continue to implement and refine a water quality and sediment monitoring program for the
estuarine system.
Policy 2.3.5:
Continue to have staff coordinate with the City of Naples staff regarding coordinated and
cooperative planning, management, and funding programs for limiting specific and cumulative
impacts on Naples Bay and its watershed. At a minimum, this agreement includes the following:
a Insure adequate sites for water dependent uses,
b. Prevent estuarine pollution,
c. Control run-off,
d. Protect living marine resources,
e. Reduce exposure to natural hazards,
f. Ensure public access,
g. Provide a continuing monitoring program.
Policy 2.3.6:
The County will only allow development activities which will not adversely impact coastal water
resources. This is implemented through the followingmechanisms:
a. Require all applicable Federal and State permits addressing water quality to be submitted
to Collier County before Collier County issues a Final Development Order.
b. Excluding single family homes, any project impacting 5 acres or more of wetlands must
provide a pre and post development water quality analysis to demonstrate no increase in
nutrient, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc and copper
loading in the post development scenario.
c. By January 2008, the County shall undertake an assessment ofthe current model used to
evaluate pre and post development pollutant loadings referenced in (b) of this Policy. At
a minimum, the purpose of this assessment will be to verify the accuracy of the model
and to provide data evaluating stormwater management structure design. In reviewing the
accuracy of the model, the County will include an evaluation of the reduction of lake
depths with time and the corresponding loss of retention volume, the impact of lake
stratification, and the need for aeration. The assessment will also include the sampling of
runoff from undisturbed sites and from permitted stormwater outfalls for the parameters
listed in Paragraph (b) of this Policy and pesticides. The results of the assessment and
recommendations regarding the pollutant loading analysis, revisions to current model
12
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
methodology, potential regulatory restrictions, and further monitoring shall be presented
to the Board of County Commissioners for further direction.
Objective 2.4:
Collier County shall continue taking a coordinated and cooperative approach with the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regarding environmental planning,
management and monitoring programs for Rookery Bay and Cape Romano - Ten Thousand
Islands Aquatic Preserves and their watersheds. As part of this process, the County shall
continue to notify FDEP of development projects within the watersheds of these preserve areas.
Policy 2.4.1:
At a minimum the County shall notify Department of Environmental Protection of proposed land
development projects that could affect these preserves.
Policy 2.4.2:
The County shall request the Department of Environmental Protection staff to participate in the
development of future coastal and watershed management plans.
Policy 2.4.3:
The County will request the cooperation of the Department of Environmental Protection to
gather data and information needed for monitoring water quality, habitat changes and land use
activities within the watersheds of these preserves.
OBJECTIVE 2.5:
The County will continue with the implementation of its estuarine management program by
requiring development to meet its current standards addressing stormwater management, and
the protection of seagrass beds, dune and strand, and wetland habitats.
Policy 2.5.1:
Identify land use activities that have the potential to degrade the estuarine environmental
quality.
Policy 2.5.2:
This management program shall incorporate information obtained from the various watershed
management plans described elsewhere in this Element.
Policy 2.5.3:
This program shall in part be based on the estuarine data analyses and management
recommendations contained in the County's coastal management program's technical reports.
Other Pertinent CCME GOPs
OBJECTIVE 3.4:
13
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Collect and evaluate data and information designed to monitor the quality of ground water in
order to identify the need for additional protection measures. (Refer to Objective 1.3 in the
Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element.)
Policy 3.4.2:
Coordinate data gathering activities with State and Federal agencies to minimize duplication of
efforts and enhance the quality of information gathered.
GOAL 4: THE COUNTY SHALL CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY
MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES.
OBJECTIVE 4.1:
Collect and evaluate data and information designed to more accurately determine water use in
Collier County such as the County's database tracking all permitted wells and wells having
consumptive use permits.
Policy 4.1.1:
Use as much as possible the existing reporting requirements and computer database of the South
Florida Water Management District.
Policy 4.1.2:
Work with the agricultural community to devise a method for determining agricultural pumpage.
Policy 4.1.3:
Compile from appropriate local, State, Federal and private organizations the water use
requirements of the native plant and animal community associations within the County.
Objective 4.2:
The Collier County Water-Sewer District and the Collier County Water and Wastewater
Authority will continue to promote conservation of Collier County's potable water supply and
will continue to develop, implement and refine a comprehensive conservation strategy, which
will identify specific goals for reducing per capita potable water consumption.
Policy 4.2.1:
Continue to rely on the South Florida Water Management District to take appropriate measures
to conserve water in emergency situations.
Policy 4.2.2:
The County shall negotiate agreements with area golf courses to accept and use treated
wastewater eftluent for irrigation when and where such treated effiuent is available from existing
and future wastewater treatment plants.
Policy 4.2.3:
Identify existing and future publicly owned lands suitable for irrigation with treated wastewater
effluent, such as government building grounds, parks and highway medians, and incorporate
these into future planning for effiuent disposal.
14
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Policy 4.2.4:
Identify existing and future privately owned lands suitable for irrigation with treated wastewater
effiuent, such as cemeteries, agricultural operations, nurseries and commercial/industrial parks,
and incorporate these into future planning for effiuent disposal.
Policy 4.2.5:
Evaluate and make recommendations, where appropriate, for plumbing fixtures and landscapes
that are designed for water conservation purposes.
GOAL 6:
THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND
APPROPRIATELY USE ITS NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES
AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.
Objective 6.1:
The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum
preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective
measurable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the
County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay.
Policy 6.1.1:
For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated
Area, and AgriculturaVRural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-
Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved
through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and
criteria. unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where
the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding
the ACSC requirements, this policy shall apply to all non-agricultural development except for
single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed
management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant
to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element.
Coastal High Hazard Area Non-Coastal High Hazard Area
Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres. 10%
Residential and Mixed Equal to or greater Equal to or greater than 5 acres
Use Development than 2.5 acres 25% and less than 20 acres. 15%
Equal to or
15
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
greater than 20 ac. 25%
Golf Course 35% 35%
Commercial and Less than 5 acres. 10% Less than 5 acres. 10%
Industrial
Development Equal to or greater Equal to or
than 5 acres. 15% greater than 5 acres. 15%
Industrial
Development (Rural- 50%, not to exceed 25% of the 50%, not to exceed 25% of the
Industrial District only) project site. project site.
The following standards and criteria shall apply to the vegetation retention requirements
referenced above.
(1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defmed as a vegetative community
having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant
species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are calculated based
on the amount of "native vegetation" that conforms to this definition.
(2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under-story and ground cover
emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection to offsite
preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to provide for a core area
that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the interface between the
preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts from other land uses. Criteria
for determining the dimensional standards of the preserve are to be set out in the Land
Development Code.
(3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall
be set aside as preserve areas. On-site and off-site preserve areas shall be protected by a
permanent conservation mechanism to prohibit further development, consistent with the
requirements of this policy. The type of permanent conservation mechanism, including
conservation easements, required for a specific development may vary based on preserve
area size, type of development approval, and other factors, as set forth in the County's
land development regulations.
(4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following
criteria in descending order of priority:
a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as
corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to
facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement through the
site, consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element.
16
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks.
Objective 6.2:
The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to
the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to make this
objective measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be
coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element.
Policy 6.2.1
As required by Florida Administrative Code 9J5-5.006(l)(b), wetlands identified by the 1994-95
SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series.
These areas shall be verified by a jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this
element, at the time of project permitting to determine the exact location of jurisdictional
wetland boundaries.
Policy 6.2.2
Wetlands shall be defined pursuant to Section 373.019 Florida Statutes. The location of
jurisdictional wetland boundaries are further described by the delineation methodology in
Section 373.421 Florida Statutes.
Policy 6.2.3:
Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural
functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. This wetland preservation and conservation
process shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plan process, as referenced in
Objective 2.1 of this Element. However, the process outlined within this policy is primarily
based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away from large
interconnected wetland systems. These wetland systems have been identified based on their
type, values, functions, sizes, conditions and locations within Collier County. These systems
predominantly occur east of the County's Urban boundary, as delineated on the Countywide
Future Land Use Map (FLUM), within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Many of these
wetlands fall within public lands or land targeted for acquisition. High quality wetlands systems
located on private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation
requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship
Sending Area Designations, or via the NRP A or Sending designations within the Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District or land/easement acquisition, or innovative landowner incentives. Protection
measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the northeastern portion of Collier
County, excluding the community of Immokalee, are contained in the Rural Lands Stewardship
Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) of the FLUE (and as depicted on the FLUM). Protection
measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the Urban and Estates designated
areas of the County shall be based upon the jurisdictional determinations made by the applicable
state or federal agency. Where permits issued by such state or federal agencies allow for impacts
to wetlands within Urban and Estates designated areas and require mitigation for such impacts,
the permitting agency's mitigation requirements shall be deemed to preserve and protect
wetlands and their functions, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan
preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands.
17
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County shall be
protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land
uses and require specific land development standards for the remaining allowable land uses.
Collier County shall direct incompatible land uses away from these large landscape scale
wetland systems through implementation of the following protection and conservation
mechanisms:
(1) Conservation Designation
Best available data indicates that 76% of all wetlands found in Collier County are contained
within the boundaries of the Conservation Designation as depicted on the Countywide Future
Land Use Map. The overall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and
maintain the natural resources of Collier County and their associated environmental,
recreational, and economic benefits. The allowed land uses specified in the FLUE's
Conservation Designation (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section IV.) will
accommodate limited residential development and future non-residential development.
These limitations support Collier County's comprehensive process to direct concentrated
population growth and intensive land development away from large connected wetland
systems.
(2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC)
Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the Big Cypress
Area of Critical State Concern Overlay. The land development regulations contained in the
ACSC Overlay District, as depicted on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, provide
standards that facilitate the goal of directing higher intensity land uses away from wetland
systems. The development standards for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use
Designation Section V.) specify that site alterations shall be limited to 10% of the total site.
The majority ofthe land contained within the ACSC is also within the Conservation
Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of that Land Use Designation.
(3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs)
Major wetland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to establish the NRP A
Overlay District as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and as discussed in FLUE Land Use
Designation, Section V.C. These areas include high functioning wetland systems and,
although portions of the NRP A Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation,
represent approximately 12% of the County's wetlands, which are not located in
Conservation Lands. Based on the relatively high concentration of wetlands within NRP A
designated lands, incompatible land uses shall be directed away from these areas. Allowable
land uses within NRP As are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation
standards of 90%.
(4) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands
Best available data indicates that 16,000+ acres of wetlands are contained within designated
Sending Lands and that such wetlands constitute approximately 70% of land cover in these
areas. Incompatible land uses are directed away from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
Sending Lands through an incentive-based Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program
that allows land owners within these Sending Lands to transfer their residential density out of
the Sending Lands to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (and limited Urban) Receiving Lands.
A complete description of the TDR Program is contained in the FLUE, Future Land Use
Designation Description Section, AgriculturallRural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use
18
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
District. Incompatible land uses are also directed away from Sending Lands through
restrictions on allowable uses. Finally, allowable uses within these lands are also subject to
native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 80% to 90%, as required by Policy
6.7.1 of this Element.
(5) Flowway Stewardship Areas Ire-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32
and 2002-54}
Flowway Stewardship Areas have been designated within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area
Overlay (RLSA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and are shown on the Rural
Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Map Series. Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs)
are for the most part privately owned wetlands that are located within the Camp Keais Strand
and Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands form the principal wetland flowway systems in the
RLSA. The Overlay provides an incentive to permanently protect FSAs through the creation
and transfer of Stewardship Credits. It also contains provisions that eliminate incompatible
uses from the FSAs and, which establish protection measures.
(6) Watershed Management Plans
Collier County will establish watershed management plans throughout the County, but with
particular emphasis on the Urban and Estates designated areas. These watershed
management plans shall be established in accordance with Objective 2.1 of this Element and
will include the preservation or, where feasible, creation of landscape-scale wetland
conservation areas to act as habitat, natural water quality treatment and water quantity
retention/detention areas. The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from such
large-scale wetlands.
Collier County shall allow for more intensive development to occur in Rural Fringe
Receiving Lands, North Golden Gate Estates, the Rural-Settlement Area District, and the
Urban Designated Areas subject to the land uses identified in the Future Land Use Element,
the lmmokalee Area Master Plan, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. These areas
account for only 6% of Collier County's wetlands. Except for tidal wetlands within the
coastal portion of the Urban Designated Area and wetlands that are part of an established
watershed management plan, the County finds that the wetland systems in these areas are
more fragmented and altered than those systems located within the Conservation Lands,
ACSC and NRP A Overlays, and Rural Fringe Sending Lands.
On a project-specific basis, wetlands and wetland functions shall be protected through the
following mechanisms:
(1) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland permitting;
(2) Vegetation preservation policies supporting CCME Objective 6.1;
(3) Wetland protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2;
(4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE
(5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, as
per Objective 2.1 of this Element.
(6) Land or easement acquisition.
(7) Land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief, or USDA grants
for restoration.
19
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Policy 6.2.4:
Within the Urban Designated area, the County shall rely on the wetland jurisdictional
determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable jurisdictional agency, except for
wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area The County shall direct
impacts away from such wetlands.
This policy shall be implemented as follows:
(1) Where permits issued by such jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands
within this designated area and require mitigation for such impacts, this shall be deemed
to meet the objective of protection and conservation of wetlands and the natural functions
of wetlands within this area, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed
Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such
wetlands.
(2) The County shall require the appropriate jurisdictional permit prior to the issuance of a
fmallocal development order permitting site improvements, except in the case of single-
family residences, which are not part of an approved development or are not platted,
unless the residences are within a watershed management conservation area identified in
a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1
of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the
issuance of a final local development order permitting site improvements.
(3) Collier County will work with the jurisdictional agencies and applicants to encourage
mitigation to occur within targeted areas of the County including, but not limited to:
Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs); lands targeted for a acquisition by a public
or private conservation entity; wetlands that are part of an approved watershed
management plan, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element; and other areas appropriate for
mitigation, such as flow ways and areas containing habitat for animal listed species.
(4) Within the lmmokalee Urban Designated Area, there may exist high quality wetland
systems connected to the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand system. These wetlands
require greater protection measures than wetlands located in other portions of the Urban
Designated Area, and therefore the wetland protection standards set forth in Policy 6.2.5
shall apply in this area. This area is generally identified as the area designated as
Wetlands Connected To Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System on the Immokalee
Future Land Use Map and is located in the southwest Immokalee Urban designated area,
connected to the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais System. Within one (1) year of the effective
date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to
determine the process and specific circumstances when the provisions of Policy 6.2.5 will
apply.
Policy 6.2.5:
Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp
Keais Strand System which is contained within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, Collier
County shall direct land uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts
within wetlands based upon the vegetation requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element, the
wetland functionality assessment described in paragraph (2) below, and the final permitting
requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. A direct impact is hereby defined
20
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
as the dredging or filling of a wetland or adversely changing the hydroperiod of a wetland. This
policy shall be implemented as follows:
(1) The County shall apply the vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this
element to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall be
preserved as part ofthis vegetation requirement according to the following criteria:
a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element shall be met be preserving
wetlands with the highest wetland functionality scores. Wetland functionality
assessment scores shall be those described in paragraph (2) of this policy. Wetlands
having a WRAP score of at least 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment
Method score of 0.7 shall be preserved on site. This policy is not intended in all cases
to require preservation of wetlands exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.1.2 of
this element. Within one year, the County shall develop specific criteria to be used to
determine when wetlands having a WRAP score greater than 0.65 or a
Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of greater than 0.7
shall be required to be retained exceeding the acreage required by Policy
6.1.2 of this element.
(2) In order to assess the values and functions of wetlands at the time of project review,
applicants shall rate functionality of wetlands using the South Florida Water
Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), as described in
Technical Publication Reg-OOI, dated September 1997, and updated August 1999, or the
Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method, F.A.C. Chapter 62-345. The applicant
shall submit to County staff, agency accepted WRAP scores or Uniform Wetland
Mitigation Assessment Method scores. County staff shall review this functionality
assessment as part of the County's EIS provisions and shall use the results to direct
incompatible land uses away from the highest functioning wetlands according to the
requirements found in paragraph (I) above.
(3) All direct impacts shall be mitigated for pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (6) of
this policy.
(4) Single family residences shall follow the requirements contained within Policy 6.2.7 of
this element.
(5) The County shall separate preserved wetlands from other land uses with appropriate
buffering requirements. The County shall require a minimum 50-foot vegetated upland
buffer adjacent to a natural water body, and for other wetlands a minimum 25-foot vegetated
upland buffer adjacent to the wetland. A structural buffer may be used in conjunction with a
vegetative buffer that would reduce the vegetative buffer width by 50%. A structural buffer
shall be required adjacent to wetlands where direct impacts are allowed. Wetland buffers
shall conform to the following standards:
a. The buffer shall be measured landward from the approved jurisdictional line.
b. The buffer zone shall consist of preserved native vegetation. Where native vegetation
does not exist, native vegetation compatible with the existing soils and expected
hydrologic conditions shall be planted.
c. The buffer shall be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by
the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council.
21
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
d. The following land uses are considered to be compatible with wetland functions and
are allowed within the buffer:
1. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks and recreational shelters;
1. Pervious nature trails;
3 . Water management structures;
4. Mitigation areas;
5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is
comparable in nature with the foregoing uses.
e. A structural buffer may consist of a stem-wall, berm, or vegetative hedge with suitable
fencing.
(6) Mitigation shall be required for direct impacts to wetlands in order to result in no net loss
of wetland functions.
a. Mitigation Requirements:
1. ''No net loss of wetland functions" shall mean that the wetland functional score of
the proposed mitigation equals or exceeds the wetland functional score of the
impacted wetlands. However, in no case shall the acreage proposed for mitigation
be less than the acreage being impacted.
2. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands
shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance
capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland.
3. Protection shall be provided for preserved or created wetland or upland vegetative
communities offered as mitigation by placing a conservation easement over the
land in perpetuity, providing for initial exotic plant removal (Class I invasive
exotic plants defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council) and continuing
exotic plant maintenance.
4. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration, the
applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (6)a.l, (6)a.2, and (6)a.3
of this policy. If agency permits have not provided mitigation consistent with this
policy, Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that of the jurisdictional
agencIes.
5. Mitigation requirements for single-family lots shall be determined by the State
and Federal agencies during their permitting process, pursuant to the requirements
of Policy 6.2.7 of this element.
b. Mitigation Incentives:
1. Collier County shall encourage certain types of mitigation by providing a variety
of incentives in the form of density bonuses and credits to open space and
vegetation retention requirements. Density bonuses shall be limited to no more
than 10% of the allowed density.
2. Preferred mitigation activities that would qualify for these incentives include, but
are not limited, to the following:
22
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
(a) Adding wetland habitat to or restoring wetland functions within Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District Sending Lands,
(b) Creating, enhancing or restoring wading bird habitat to be located near wood
stork, and/or other wading bird colonies.
3. Within one (I) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier County
shall adopt specific criteria in the LDC to implement this incentive program, and
to identify other mitigation priorities.
Policy 6.2.6: Ire-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and 2002-54}
Within the Urban Designation and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, required wetland
preservation areas, buffer areas, and mitigation areas shall be dedicated as conservation and
common areas in the form of conservation easements and shall be identified or platted as
separate tracts; and, in the case of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), these areas shall also
be depicted on the POD Master Plan. These areas shall be maintained free from trash and
debris and from Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant
Council. Land uses allowed in these areas shall be limited to those listed in Policy 6.2.5(5)d of
this element and shall not include any other activities that are detrimental to drainage, flood
control, water conservation, erosion control or fish and wildlife habitat conservation and
preservation.
Policy 6.2.7:
Within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County shall rely on
the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable
jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan
preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. This policy shall be
implemented as follows:
(1) For single-family residences within Southern Golden Gate Estates or within the Big
Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, the County shall require the appropriate federal
and state wetland-related permits before Collier County issues a building permit.
(2) Outside of Southern Golden Gate Estates and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State
Concern. Collier County shall inform applicants for individual single-family building
permits that federal and state wetland permits may be required prior to construction
unless the proposed residence is within a watershed management conservation area
identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting
Objective 2.1 of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional permit is
required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The County shall also notify the
applicable federal and state agencies of single-family building permits applications in
these areas.
(3) Within North Golden Gate Estates and the Rural Settlement Area, Collier County shall
incorporate certain preserved and/or created wetlands and associated uplands into the
County's approved watershed management plans, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element.
The size and location of wetlands incorporated into the watershed management plans will
be based upon the approved requirements for such plans. The County may issue single-
family building permits within or adjacent to such wetlands, subject to appropriate
23
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
mitigation requirements, which preserve the functionality of the wetland within the
applicable watershed management plan. For a proposed residence which is to be located
within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management
Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. the
appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(4) Collier County shall continue to work with federal and state agencies to identify
properties that have a high probability of wetlands and animal listed species occurrence.
The identification process will be based on hydric soils data and other applicable criteria
Once this identification process is complete, the County will determine if the process is
sufficiently accurate to require federal and state wetland approvals prior to the issuance
of a building permit within these areas. The County shall use information on wetland
and/or listed species occurrence to inform property owners of the potential existence of
wetlands and/or listed species on their property.
(5) Within one year after Watershed Management Plans are accepted by the Board of County
Commissioners, Collier County shall develop and implement additional means to protect
wetland systems identified in each Plan for preservation or restoration. Means to
consider include innovative landowner incentives, transferable development rights, tax
relief, land or easement acquisition, state and federal grants, and enhanced regulations.
Policy 6.2.8
For the County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay, as designated on the FLUM,
wetlands shall be preserved pursuant to the RLSA Overlay policies found in the Future Land Use
Element.
Policy 6.2.9 [re-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and 2002-54J
The County shall provide for adequate staff to implement the policies supporting Objective 6.2.
GOAL 13: THE COUNTY SHALL AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF
EXISTING REGULATORY PROGRAMS.
OBJECTIVE 13.1:
To establish, prior to the adoption of any land development regulation to implement this
Element, including but not limited to NRP A management guidelines and watershed management
plans, a program to review such regulations and identify existing regulatory programs exercised
by regional, State, or Federal agencies with jurisdiction over the activities sought to be regulated.
Policy 13.1.1:
There will be no unnecessary duplication of existing Regional, State, or Federal permitting
programs.
Policy 13.1.2:
The County may adopt regulations to strengthen existing permitting programs.
Policy 13.1.3:
24
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Prior to adopting any new regulations to implement this Element, the following guidelines shall
be met:
a. The regulation fulfills an important need that is not adequately addressed by existing
Regional, State, or Federal regulations.
b. The regulation can be effectively and efficiently administered by existing County staff or
by an authorized expansion of County staff.
c. The cost to the County of implementing the regulation has been identified and
considered.
Other Pertinent Section GOPs
Some of the following Gaps do not directly address Watershed Management Plan goals
specifically however, they address relevant issues that must be considered and supported by the
plans.
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
This portion of the Collier County Growth Management Plan inventories both the natural
conditions and stormwater management activities within unincorporated Collier County.
In Collier County, there are two (2) primary service providers with regard to the provision
of stormwater management services. The County's Transportation Services Division
maintains drainage systems associated with County and State Roadways as well as the
Secondary Drainage System. The Big Cypress Basin Board, an arm of the South Florida
Water Management District (SFWMD), maintains the larger, regional surface water
management systems within Collier County. The regional drainage system is also referred
to as the Primary Drainage System.
However, management of stormwater is concerned not only with flood prevention (a
quantity issue), but also with the removal of various pollutants picked up by the
stormwater as it flows across the County's developed land areas (a quality issue). Such
pollutants can include oils, greases, heavy metals, pesticides, fertilizers and other
substances, which can have a deleterious impact on the County's natural systems and,
above all, its groundwater quality. Note that, in this respect, there is overlap in the
intended purpose between the Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-
elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge areas. However, the emphasis of the
Drainage Sub-element is on surface water protection, whereas the emphasis ofthe Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-element is on groundwater protection.
The term "stormwater management" refers to a set of comprehensive strategies for dealing
with both stormwater quantity and stormwater quality issues. The primary component of
these strategies is the need to ensure that the volume, rate, timing and pollutant load of
stormwater runoff after development is similar to that which occurred prior to
development. To accomplish this task, stormwater management entities employ a
25
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
combination of structural and non-structural techniques. Non-structural techniques
emphasize preservation or restoration of natural drainage features to promote infIltration,
fIltering and slowing of runoff. Structural techniques include the variety of manmade
channels and control structures maintained within the primary and secondary drainage
systems. The objective of stormwater management is to develop a combination of
techniques which provide for adequate pollutant removal and flood protection in the most
economical manner.
One of the key principles of current stormwater management techniques is recognition of
the need for basin-wide (or watershed basin) planning. The stormwater management
system has to be designed so as to ensure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to
handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present
at the time of design. Subsequent development upstream must then utilize stormwater
management techniques and systems, which will maintain predevelopment run-off
conditions so that the capacity of the downstream portion of the watershed is not exceeded.
In this respect, there is an overlap between the intended purpose of the Drainage Sub-
element and Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, including the
Watershed Management Plans discussed under Objective 2.1 ofthe CCME.
GOAL:
COLLIER COUNTY SHALL PROVIDE DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR
EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF
QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND
PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER
RECHARGE AREAS.
OBJECTIVE 1 (CAPITAL FACILITY PLANNING FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS):
The County shall utilize the Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR)
process to update the Drainage Atlas Maps and Channel/Structure Inventory components of the
adopted Water Management Master Plan and to verify the existing watershed basin boundaries
within Collier County. The County will also verify the design storm capacity of the drainage
facilities within each basin, and determine the costs necessary to maintain the facility capacities
to selected design storm standards. lIDs information shall be used to program operational funds
in the Annual County Budget and to identify necessary capital projects and basin studies in the
Annual Capital Improvement Element Update and Amendment.
Policy 1.1:
The County shall update and revise stormwater management maintenance procedures and capital
projects based on continual facilities performance monitoring activities. Consideration will be
given to natural systems as identified in Policy 2.1.4 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element, existing developments and proposed developments.
Policy 1.2:
26
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
County drainage system capital facility planning shall be designed to implement procedures and
projects in a manner to ensure that adequate stormwater management facility capacity is
available at the time a development permit is issued, or that such capacity will be available when
needed to serve the development.
Policy 1.3:
The County shall continue to develop public drainage facilities, which maintain the groundwater
table as a source of recharge for the County's potable water aquifers, provide a source of
irrigation water for agricultural, horticultural and golf course operations and provide water to
native vegetation.
Policy 1.4:
The County shall continue to evaluate structural and non-structural measures for restoring
historical hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where possible and for reducing the
impacts of canal and stormwater discharges to estuaries. Selected measures will be
implemented through the watershed management planning process identified within Goal
2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Policy 1.5:
Watershed Management Plans will be undertaken as set forth in Objective 2.1 of the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). After each plan is completed, the
results will be made available to the property owners located within the basin's boundaries for
their use in petitioning the Board of County Commissioners to create a taxing/assessment unit to
fund the proposed implementation of the plan's recommendations. Until the Watershed
Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the interim standards for development
as contained in CCME Objective 2.1.
OBJECTIVE 2:
The County shall maintain adopted drainage level of service standards for basins and sub-
basins identified in the Water Management Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage
level of service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed
management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of this Growth Management Plan.
Policy 2.1:
The following levels of service for drainage are hereby adopted for the purpose of issuing
development permits. Upon completion of each associated Watershed Management Plan, the
level of service will be modified, if warranted.
A. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in
Collier County Ordinance Numbers 74-50, 90-10 and 2001-27, and Land Development
Code Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended.
27
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
B. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those
existing Levels of Service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed
Water Management Master Plan as follows:
LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS
BASIN
LEVEL OF
SERVICE
MAIN GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM
Main Golden Gate Canal Basin
D
Cypress Canal Basin
D
Harvey Canal Basin
D
Green Canal Basin
Airport Road Canal South Basin
Corkscrew Canal Basin
Orange Tree Canal Basin
951 Canal Central Basin
C
D
D
D
C
DISTRICT NO.6 SYSTEM
Rock Creek Basin
C-4 Canal Basin
Lely Main Canal Basin
Lely Canal Branch Basin
Lely Manor Canal Basin
Haldeman Creek Basin
Winter Park Outlet Basin
D
C
D
D
D
D
D
COCOHATCHEE RIVER SYSTEM
Cocohatchee River Basin
Pine Ridge Canal Basin
Palm River Canal Basin
West Branch Cocohatchee River Basin
East Branch Cocohatchee River Basin
Airport Road Canal North Basin
951 Canal North Basin
D
C
D
C
D
D
D
GORDON RIVER EXTENSION
Gordon River Extension Basin
Goodlette-Frank Road Ditch Basin
D
D
28
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
HENDERSON CREEK BASIN
Henderson Creek Basin
D
OBJECTIVE 5:
The County shall continue to regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the
functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas.
Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning
process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land
Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended).
Policy 5.1:
Collier County shall periodically review all appropriate Water Management Ordinances and
regulations to determine their effectiveness in protecting the functions of natural drainage
features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas.
Policy 5.2:
Based upon the periodic review described in Policy 5.1, the County shall develop any
appropriate new ordinances and regulations that are necessary to ensure protection of the
functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas.
OBJECTIVE 6:
The County shall protect the functions of natural drainage features through the application of
standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stormwater management
systems. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the watershed management
planning process identified within Goal 2 and Objective 2.1 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. lbis objective is made measurable
through the following policies:
Policy 6.1:
Projects shall be designed and operated so that off-site discharges will meet State water quality
standards, as set forth in Chapter 62-302.300, F.A.C., as it existed at the date of project approval.
Policy 6.2:
Collier County's retention and detention requirements shall be the same as those provided in the
South Florida Water Management District's Basis of Review, as it existed at the time of project
approval.
Policy 6.3:
Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and
25 year return frequency. The allowable off-site discharge rates are as follows:
a. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
(North of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
29
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
0.06 cfs/acre
b. Airport Road South Sub-basin
(South of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
c. Cocohatchee Canal Basin
d. Lely Canal Basin
e. Harvey Basin
f. Wiggins Pass Basin
g. All other areas
0.04 cfs/acre
0.06 cfs/acre
0.055 cfs/acre
0.13 cfs/acre
0.15 cfs/acre
The County may exempt projects from these allowable off-site discharge rates if any of the
following applies:
1. The project is exempt from allowable off-site discharge limitations pursuant to Section
40E-400.315, F AC.
2. The project is part of an existing SFWMD permit. which allows discharge rates different
than those listed above.
3. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off-site at a rate higher than
those listed above. The documentation required for this purpose shall be prepared by a
registered professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes
the applicable criteria in the "SFWMD Basis of Review for Environmental Resource
Permit Applications". The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County
and SFWMD staff. The study shall include the following site-specific information:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
Topography
Soil types and soil storage volume
Vegetation types
Antecedent conditions
Design rainfall hydro graph
Depression storage capacity
Receiving water hydro graph, and
Other relevant hydrologic and hydraulic data.
Using the above information, a hydrologic and hydraulic model shall be developed which
demonstrates the higher off-site discharge rate.
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
30
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Potable Water Sub-Element
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Potable Water Sub-Element is to provide for the health and safety of the
residents of Collier County by ensuring adequate potable water supply and distribution facilities
that are cost-effective and environmentally sound. Such facilities may be provided through the
Collier County Water-Sewer District, private utilities, other public utilities that operate within
portions of the unincorporated County, or (in certain areas) private supply wells. In addition to
the supply and distribution of potable water for residential and commercial purposes, the
Potable Water Sub-Element also contains provisions related to establishment of new potable
water sources, water conservation, and irrigation.
Goal, Objectives and Policies Potable Water Sub-Element
GOAL:
TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING
ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND
IMPLEMENTABLE POTABLE WATER FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
OBJECTIVE 1:
The County shall locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of
the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of
Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable
water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be
based upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's T en- Year
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated annually), the Collier County Water-Sewer
Master Plan, and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida
Water Management District.
Policy 1.1:
The County shall continue to expand the ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recovery) system as a
potential emergency and seasonal potable water source.
Policy 1.2:
The County shall continue to implement a program for the protection of existing and potential
potable water supply sources.
Policy 1.3:
The County shall continue to identify sufficient quantities of water sources to meet the County's
estimated growth-related needs. Potential water sources to meet the County's 2025 water
demands include raw water from Hawthorn Zone I Aquifer (Intermediate Aquifer System) and
Lower Hawthorn Aquifer (Florida Aquifer System), identified within the County's 2005 Water
Master Plan. The County shall use these water sources as well as alternative sources, as
permitted by the State, to meet the County's needs.
Policy 1.4:
31
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption
The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District and other
regulatory agencies in implementing effective linkages between growth management and water
planning.
Policy 1.5:
The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District in the
development of the Water Master Plan Update, which is the primary planning document for the
Collier County Water-Sewer District.
Policy 1.6: The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to
produce future plans for water supply as described within the Water Master Plan Updates that
ensure the County's ability to maintain its stated Level of Service standard.
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element
I. INTRODUCTION
The Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element establishes the manner in
which Collier County will identify and protect the natural groundwater aquifers that serve
as the primary sources of drinking water for County residents and visitors. This Sub-
Element relates only to those aquifer recharge areas located in unincorporated Collier
County that serve as potable water wellfields.
The Implementation Section of this Sub-Element contains a single Goal, divided into five
(5) Objectives. Beneath each Objective are the specific County implementing policies.
The water supply protection Objectives in this Sub-Element include:
· Mapping and delineation of natural aquifer recharge areas;
· Protection of groundwater quality;
· . Groundwater quality monitoring;
· Public education with regard to groundwater protection issues; and,
· Protection of critical recharge areas and groundwater resources.
GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT
GOAL:
THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT NATURAL GROUNDWATER
AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS FROM ACTIVITIES THAT COULD DEGRADE
AND/OR CONTAMINATE THE QUALITY OF GROUNDWATER.
OBJECTIVE 1: (MAPPING AND DELINEATION OF RECHARGE AREAS)
The County shall continue to review every two years, and revise as necessary, existing
map delineations of County potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to
contamination from nearby land development and other surface activities. The biennial
review and any subsequent map revisions will be based on geologic, hydrogeologic,
hydrologic, and updated anthropogenic contaminant data aggregated since the previous
reVISIOn.
32
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
Policy 1.1: The County shall revise and update its 3-dimensional computer models of ground
water flow around public water supply wellfields, as additional data (e.g., withdrawal rates,
numbers and locations of wells within wellfields, and hydrogeologic information) become
available.
Policy 1.2: The County shall identify those County potable water wellfields, or portions of
wellfields, which are susceptible to contamination, caused by adjacent or nearby land uses,
drainage patterns, geomorphic conditions, soil properties, and/or hydrogeologic factors,
including the presence or absence of confining units. This information shall be revised
and updated as necessary.
Policy 1.3: The County shall maintain and update data on existing land uses and land use
activities that possess the greatest potential for ground water contamination.
Policy 1.4: The County shall maintain and update its maps of sensitive recharge areas as
additional anthropogenic and hydrogeologic information becomes available.
Policy 1.5: This Sub-Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the
Surficial and Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and
Hawthorne Aquifers, as described in the South Florida Water Management District's
official publications dated April, 2000 (and scheduled to be published in 2006).
OBJECTIVE 2: (PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY)
Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards.
Policy 2.1: The County shall prohibit discharges to sinkholes or other karst related features that
have direct hydrologic connections to the Surficial or Intermediate Aquifer Systems.
Policy 2.2: Non-agricultural developments requiring an Environmental Resources Permit from
the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall preserve groundwater
recharge characteristics as required by the SFWMD and as set forth in the SFWMD's
Basis for Review, dated January 2004 and as regularly updated. Ground water recharge
shall also be protected through the application of the retention/detention requirements
and allowable off-site discharge rates for non-agricultural developments specified in
Policies 6.2 and 6.3 in the Drainage Sub-Element.
Policy 2.3: The County standards for protecting the quality of ground water recharge within the
wellhead protection areas identified in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) shall be
those provided in Policy 3.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
Policy 2.4: Collier County shall evaluate the necessity for adopting more stringent ground water
recharge standards for High or Prime Recharge areas within 2 years of the SFWMD
Governing Board's adoption of such areas.
OBJECTIVE 3: (GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING) The County shall continue
to collect and evaluate ground water quality data, identifying ambient water quality values and
trends, comparing analyzed concentrations to Florida Ground Water Guidance Concentrations,
33
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
and providing information to water resources planning and management entities, and to the
general public.
Policy 3.1: The County shall continue its existing water quality monitoring program to provide
baseline data. evaluate long-term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the
effectiveness of the County's ground water protection program.
Policy 3.2: The County shall coordinate data gathering activities with State and Federal agencies
to minimize duplication of efforts and enhance the quality of information gathered.
Policy 3.3: The County will annually assess its groundwater quality monitoring data to
determine whether monitoring activities and County Ordinances require expansion, modification
or reduction.
Policy 3.4: The County shall continually gather and evaluate appropriate data for the purpose of
refining and improving the groundwater quality monitoring database used in the County's 3-
dimensional ground water model.
Policy 3.5: Collier County shall continue to conduct water resource planning with appropriate
County, City of Naples, and SFWMD staff to provide for ground water resource
development, utilization, and conservation.
OBJECTIVE: 4: (PUBLIC EDUCATION WITH REGARD TO GROUNDWATER
PROTECTION ISSUES) The County shall continue current activities of providing the public
with educational materials concerning ground water protection issues in Collier County. These
may
include, but shall not be limited to, the preparation of annual technical publications of
ground water quality data, an informational website for groundwater quality issues,
general information publications, establishment of a speakers' bureau, K-12 classroom
presentations, and in-service teacher workshops and seminars.
Policy 4.1: The County shall continue to advise the public on the appropriate disposal methods
for hazardous wastes, for the purpose of reducing or avoiding the potential for groundwater
contamination. In performing this task, the County may utilize the public educational measures
listed within Objective 4 of this Sub-Element, or any other measures which may be appropriate.
Policy 4.2: The County shall continue to provide information in a manner that can be understood
by the general public regarding Collier County's groundwater system, its vulnerability to
contamination and measures needed to protect it from contamination. In performing this task, the
County may utilize the public educational measures listed within Objective 4 of this Sub-
Element, or any other measures which may be appropriate.
OBJECTIVE 5: (pROTECTION OF CRITICAL RECHARGE AREAS AND
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES) The County shall implement plans to preserve critical
ground water recharge areas and ground water resources, and will review, evaluate, and revise (if
34
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
warranted) those plans and actions, based on the best available geologic, hydrologic,
hydrogeologic, and anthropogenic contaminant data.
Policy 5.1: The County shall develop, and continually update, technical criteria for determining
those recharge areas, which are critical to the County's long-term ground water needs.
Policy 5.2: The County shall continue to identify critical recharge areas and appropriate
protective mechanisms.
Policy 5.3: The County shall continue to identify costs, funding mechanisms and private
property rights issues associated with the protection of critical recharge areas.
Policy 5.4: The County shall continue to operate the petroleum storage tank: inspection program,
especially in identified wellfield protection zones, operating within available State
Funding
35
Water Resource Protection
Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) is the Future Land Use Element Sub-District which
was adopted in 2002 through Ordinance 02-32, as a result of Final Order- ACC-99-002.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
ACC-99-002 was issued by the State due to the County's GMP being found to lack regulatory
protection for environmentally sensitive property, not adequately discouraging urban sprawl and
preventing the premature conversion of agricultural land. The Final Order required the following
modifications to the GMP to address the issues within three specified areas:
1. Identify and propose measures to protect prime agricultural areas.
2. Direct incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat in order to protect water
quality and quantity and maintain the natural water regime as well as to protect listed animal
species and their habitats.
3. Assess the growth potential of the Area by assessing the potential conversion of rural lands to
other uses, in appropriate locations, while discouraging urban sprawl, directing incompatible
land uses away from critical habitat and encouraging development that utilizes creative land
use planning techniques including, but not limited to, public and private schools, urban
villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based allocations, clustering and open space
provisions and mixed use development.
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District was designed to address the above specified areas of concern.
The District, as identified on Future Land Use Map, consists of approximately 93,600 acres.
Significant portions of the District are adjacent to the urbanized area as well as the semi-rural, rapidly
developing; large-lot North Golden Gate Estates platted lands. Agricultural land uses within the Rural
Fringe Mixed Use District do not represent a significant portion of the County's active agricultural
lands.
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides a transition between the Urban and Estates Designated
lands and between the Urban and Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) and Conservation designated
lands farther to the east. As of June 2002, the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District consisted of more than
5,550 tax parcels, and included at least 3,835 separate and distinct property owners. Alternative land
use strategies were developed for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in part, to consider these
existing ownership patterns. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District employs a balanced approach,
including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property rights,
providing for large areas of open space, and allowing, in designated areas, appropriate types, density
and intensity of development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District allows for a mixture of urban and
rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and sewer, schools, recreational
facilities, commercial uses and essential services deemed necessary to serve the residents of the
District.
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is separated into three specific areas, Sending Lands, Neutral
Lands, and Receiving Lands. Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of
environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for
listed species. The permitted uses within the Sending Lands are limited to a narrow list of permitted
and conditional uses and the regulations allow residential density at a maximum density of one
dwelling unit per 40 acres or one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of less than 40 acres, which existed on
1
RURAl. FRTN(;F. MnrF.n T~F. nT.'\TRTrTfRFMTml
or before June 22, 1999 (lots <5 acres which existed as of October 15, 1974 or January 5, 1982,
depending upon location).
Neutral Lands have been identified for limited semi-rural residential development. Available data
indicates that Neutral Lands have a higher ratio of native vegetation, and thus higher habitat values,
than lands designated as Receiving Lands, but these values do not approach those of Sending Lands.
Therefore, these lands are appropriate for limited development, if such development is directed away
from existing native vegetation and habitat. A lower maximum gross density is prescribed for Neutral
Lands when compared to Receiving Lands. Additionally, certain other uses permitted within
Receiving Lands are not authorized in Neutral Lands and the area allows a maximum density of I
dwelling unit per 5 gross acres (0.2 units per acre). The density allotted to the area prior to the
adoption of the
Receiving Lands are those lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District that have been identified
as being most appropriate for development and to which residential development units may be
transferred from areas designated as Sending Lands. Based on the evaluation of available data, these
lands have a lesser degree of environmental or listed species habitat value than areas designated as
Sending and generally have been disturbed through development, or previous or existing agricultural
operations. Various incentives are employed to direct development into Receiving Lands and away
from Sending Lands, thereby maximizing native vegetation and habitat preservation and restoration.
Such incentives include, but are not limited to: the TDR process; clustered development; density bonus
incentives; and, provisions for central sewer and water. Within the Receiving Lands the base
residential density allowable is one (1) unit per five (5) gross acres (0.2 dwelling units per acre). The
maximum density achievable in Receiving Lands through the TDR process is one (1) dwelling unit per
acre, with a minimum project size of 40 contiguous acres. This maximum density is exclusive of the
Density Blending provisions.
The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as noted, has been regulatory constructed to steer development
away from environmentally valuable land and to the areas designated Receiving Lands. The areas
designated Receiving will be the areas which will require the greatest outlay for infrastructure
improvements. Within each of the four Receiving areas, the FLUE allows the development of a single
Rural Village, which by regulation must be located where public infrastructure exists or is planned,
and shall have direct access to a roadway classified by Collier County as an arterial or collector
roadway, or access to the Village may be via new collector roadway directly accessing an existing
arterial, the cost of which shall be borne entirely by the developer. Additionally, a Rural Village may
only be approved after demonstration that the Village will be fiscally neutral or positive to county
taxpayers outside of the Village. These provisions of the regulations attempt to ensure that the highest
intensity development allowed by the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District will have in place or identified
the means for fimding the capital improvements necessary in maintaining the Level of Service (LOS)
required by the GMP. The 2005 Residential Build-out Study anticipated a total of 57,644 people or
19,433 dwelling units for the RFMUD. The Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) projects a total
of 34,837 people or 11,769 dwelling units. The population or either projection will require extensive
infrastructure to satisfy the demands of the anticipated population. The regulatory component of within
the FLUE provides for a means in which the most intense development allowed within this District.
Rural Villages, are required to provide the fimding for the capital improvements necessary to maintain
the County required adopted level of service for public facilities and services.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation &Program Assessment
As noted the RMUD was established based on the principal of preserving environmentally sensitive
lands, discouraging urban sprawl, promoting mixed use, protecting listed species and their habitats,
2
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)
while respecting the property rights inherent to the property owners within the sub-district. The
assessment on the following page provides for analysis to better determine if the goals and objectives
of the RFMUD are being met.
TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TO DATE - FY2003-2010
Number of Base TOR Credits
Processed Pendina Process
3.520.00 95.00
722.00 20.00
722.00 20.00
290.00 17.00
220.00 17.00
1.954.00 74.00
Total Acres
Number of Acres enrolled in TOR Program
3.615.00
742.00
Number of Bonus TDR Credits
742.00
Number of R&M TOR Credits
307.00
Number of Conveyance Credits
228.00
Total Credits in Program:
Total Credits Redeemed:
TDR CREDITS YET TO BE REDEEMED:
2.019.00
300.00
1.719.00
TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS- POTENTIAL
UnDrocessed
Potential Number of Acres TOTAL
17 .002.00
Potential Number of Base Credits
3,448.00
Potential Number of Bonus Credits
3,448.00
Potential Number of R&M Credits
3,448.00
Potential Number of Conveyance Credits
3,448.00
POTENTIAL CREDITS TOTAL
13.800.00
All of the above have been rounded to the next hicftest f'lIUre
There are a total of 20,617 acres which are designated sending that have been designate eligible to
sever their development right. It should be noted that this acreage does not include all designated
sending lands due to those lands being in public ownership and not eligible for the TDR program. Of
the 20,617 acres, 17.5 percent or 3,615 acres have had or are in the process of having their TDR's
separated through voluntary participation in the program. Based upon the above estimates there are
potentially 15,819 TDR's, of which 12.7 percent or 2,019 TDR's have been generated through
participation in the program. Of the 2,019 TDR's which have been generated to date, 300 TDR's or
14.8 percent of the TDR's generated have been redeemed. The TDR program became effective, due to
legal challenges in 2003, so the program has been in existence for less than seven years, with
3
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)
participation in the three mentioned areas all within the 12 to 18 percent participation range. Based
upon the information available regarding existing TDR programs, the Collier TDR program can be
viewed as active and achieving the stated purpose. In a November 30, 2004 memorandum from Dr.
James Nicholas to Marti Chumbler regarding the proposed additional TOR credits being proposed at
the time. Dr. Nicholas references two of the more successful programs in the county, Montgomery
County Maryland and New Jersey Pinelands. Both programs are approaching 25 years and for the
Montgomery County program 60 percent of possible TDR's have been severed and for Pinelands, just
fewer than 50 percent of lands have participated. If the Collier program was extrapolated on a straight
line based upon the fact that 12.7 percent of the total potential TDR's have been created, extending out
25 years or 3.5 times the current length of the Collier program, the participation rate would be 7,210
TOR's generated or 45 percent of the total 15,819 potential TOR's. This participation rate would place
Collier's program along side of the Pinewoods program, but behind the Montgomery County program,
but a successful program based upon the matrix established.
The following assessment attempts to evaluate the RFMUD regarding the number of TDR's and the
acreage designated Receiving.
Four Receivine: Areas TDR expenditure characteristics
Non Village
Maximum density I unit per acre when utilizing TDR's
Minimum 40 acres need 32 TDR's to enable.
Village
3 Allowed at maximum 1,500 acres @ 3 max DU per acre
1 Allowed at maximum 2,500 acres @ 3 max DU per acre
Total 7,000 acres @ 3 DU per acre - Maximum 21,000 DU
1,400 DU associated with Base Density
7,000 TDRS to enable 14,000 DUs based on Rural Village Bonus Credit Provision
Sub-total 7,000 IDRs used to enable 15,400 DU's
5.600 Additional TDRs need to enable maximum density
Estimated that a total of 12,600 TDRs needed to enable maximum density and size for allowed Rural ViIlages*
*number ofTDRs needed will be decreased slightly by density associated (1 DU per 5 acres) with required
greenbelt encompassing village.
Total receiving Land
- 22,020 acres
Potential TDRs
-15,809
Less developed land
- 5,201
TDRs for Max Village
-12,600
Less acres of potential Village - 7,000
Remaining Acres
- 9,819
Remaining Potential TDRs
-3,209
Remaining 3,209 TDRs could enable 4,011 acres of additional receiving land @ 1 DU per acre.
4
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)
Total - 5,808 acres of receiving land could not participate in the program due to full expenditure of potential
TDR credits.
From the above analysis, it can be determined that there are an adequate number ofTDR's potentially
in the system to enable the 74% of the eligible receive lands. It should be noted that the program was
not designed for 100% participation. Additionally, 5,201 acres of receiving land is currently
developed with residential, commercial, industrial and institutional uses (see map on the following
page). With these two additional data sets considered within the evaluation it can be concluded that
there is a sufficient number ofTDR's and potential TDR's within the program.
.~~
RURAL FRINGE
IMMOKALEE RD MIXED USE DISTRICT
;,CNr)jl,K. f4-1,~':''r <\('r:;-1::::i
PF<::;:::j""Jt.,C. i:':) /J~;;) --"c,,';:::>;:'
N::l;TR;'L ;'~,0t:7 ~"'~:Rr:~;
__ ~;;~:f.;~;;~~;tJ:"rj",
CR 858
Develooed Residentia.l: > 1 797 Acres
Developed CommerCIal: 2,825 Acres
Developed Industrial: 532 Acres
Developed Instltut,onal: 41 Acres
RANDALL BLVD
o
::;
CO
Z
o
(f)
...J
GOLDEN GATE BLVD ~
o
::;
ro
o
I..
o
(f)
w
o
o
>
....J
ill
(f)
W
o
-<
...J
Cl
IX
W
>
LL'
t
o 1.25 2.5
Miles
5
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUDj
The below map show the program activity, as well as the public ownership pattern within the RFMUD.
TDR
PROGRAM ACTIVITY
Cow.......ty
6
RURAL FRINGE "'1L'tED USE DL'\TRICT (RFMlJD)
The TDR Program Activity map, particularly for the South Belle Meade area, shows how the program
is furthering the state and local effort to protect the designated sending lands, which in the case of the
South Belle Meade area forms a natural extension of the Picayune Strand State Forest. The Public
owned land is shown in green. The conclusion from the RFMUD analysis is that the program has been
effective in accomplishing the specified goals of the sub-district, as well as the Final Order, which
promoted the creation of the RFMUD. This assessment does not align with the public comments
received at the public participation meetings held in early 2010. Those comments are provided for
below.
· Adjustment to Transfer of Development Rights (2005) program not producing desired result.
Wholesale comment on Overlay
· Application process for severances & transfers not fair to all receiving agencies. Land
Development Code
· Need more specifics of Land Management Plan required for TDR credit No.3. Cost associated
with severance process prohibited Land Development Code
· The County should develop a unified LMP for area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District Overlay
· County should be studying ideas for TDR's to be applied beyond RFMUD. Future Land Use
Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions
· County should be studying ideas to have a TDR education program. Programmatic
· TDR's should be open to be used in Urban Area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions
· Look at Marion County TDR Program. Info17lUllional
· Don't use Golden Gate Estates as thru-way for access to the coast. ObservationaL
· Don't build roads in advance of development and population. ObservationaL
· TDR program is inefficient. Observational
· TDR program doesn't incent transfers sufficiently for developers. Future Land Use Element
(FLUE) RFMUD.
· Envisioned marketfor TDR's is non-existent (don't sell) ObservationaL
· Further incent transfers into urban infill (clause is unclear and needs to be expanded). Future
Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD.
· Provide further incentives from sending to receiving. Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
RFMUD.
· Rural villages envisioned within receiving areas don't provide sufficient commercial capacity.
ObservationaL
· Design and criteria for commercial locations within the villages isolate them from major
transportation corridors (making them not viable) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD.
· No new high speed (> 36 mph) roads built in RLSA and Rural Fringe Sending Areas (low speed
essential for wildlife preservation) Observational
· RLSA and RFMUD need to be compatible with Golden Gate Master Plan. Observational
· When RFMUD was created, land use restrictions eliminated functionality of Golden Gate Master
Plan - Ex: Proposed location for estates commercial. Observational
· Receiving Areas in the RFMUD need to be changed to aI/ow services including business,
commercial and industrial can be located there to support not only the RFMUD, but adjacent
Golden Gate Estates and surrounding Communities. Observational
· TDR Program not working. Observational
· Not enough TDR's to use for density in Receiving Lands. Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
RFMUD
7
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)
.
Allow other uses on Receiving Lands (Non-residential). Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
RFMUD
RFMUD Plan not compatible with Estates Master Plan. Lost commercial opportunities for the
Estates due to RFMUD Plan. Observational
Allow owners of Receiving Lands to convert a portion of those lands to Sending Lands in order to
get more TDRs to use on their remaining Receiving Lands. This process should be available
through a rezoning-like process rather than requiring a comprehensive plan amendment.
Progra1lUlUltic
Increase the TDR Creditsformulafor Base TDRs to more than the current one (1) base TDRper
jive (5) acres. In designated Receiving Areas allow a density of greater than one unit per acre
with the use ofTDRs and not limit density above one unit per acre to only Rural Villages. Non-
villages should be able to go up to 2 units per acre. Like the RLSA, rural villages should be able
to go to 4 units per acre. Programnudic
Remove/modify the very detailed and unworkable requirements for development of a Rural
Village. Increase the TDR Bonus multiplier in a Rural Village to make it economically viable. At
the present time, the TDR program is too expensive for a higher dense village. As density
increases, average prices come down. Progra1ll1lUl1ic
Remove the minimum required purchase amount of $25,000 for a Base TDR and instead let the
market work to determine TDR prices. Progra1ll1lUl1ic
Protect existing TDR holders but drastically revamp the current program such that it is less costly
to develop in receiving areas. Progra1ll1lUl1ic
Encourage the establishment of mitigation banks in the Rural Fringe for listed species.
Progra1ll1lUl1ic
Another option to consider is to establish separate overlays for each of the four distinct Rural
Fringe development areas, similar to the North Belle Meade Overlay which has its own set of
development standards. Programmatic
The current Rural Fringe provisions of the GMP already call for the County to consider the
feasibility of establishing a "TDR Bank" to be administered by the County or some other non-for-
projit government, or quasi governmental agency with the objective of making funds available to
support the TDR program by offering initial minimal purchase prices ofTDR credits. The County
should create a TDR bank Programmatic
Consider allowing owners of large tracts in the Rural Fringe the option of utilizing the standards
and procedures of the RLSA program. Programmatic
Allow for the ability to transfer a certain percentage of density credits from the RLSA to the Rural
Fringe. Progra1ll1lUl1ic
There is a need to have different more favorable treatment for owners of Sending Land parcels of
twenty (20) acres or less to facilitate their participation. Progrtl1lfllUltic
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)
The majority of the comments are not housed or applicable to the RFMUD as provided for within the
Future Land Use Element, but rather could be classified as observational, programmatic or provided
for within the Land Development Code. There is an undercurrent or commonality to the comments
related to demand, perceived lack of demand and the need to further incentives the program to increase
demand.
From all factors evaluated, staff can conclude that the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District has been
effective in protecting the environmentally sensitive properties within the designated sending areas and
to a limited degree allowed for market utilization of available TDR's, but based upon the public
comments, there appears to be dissatisfaction with the market response to the program. The reasons
behind this perception can be explained by a number of micro and macro conditions, but regardless of
the reason, staff believes that a public review process of the RFMUD should be conducted prior to the
County's next EAR.
9
RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD)
RURAL LANDS STEWARDSHIP AREA (RLSA) OVERLAY SUB-DISTRICf
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay is the Future Land Use Element Sub-District which was adopted
in 2002 through Ordinance 02-54, as a result of Final Order - ACC-99-002.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
ACC-99-002 was issued by the State due to the County's GMP being found to lack regulatory protection for
environmentally sensitive property, not adequately discouraging urban sprawl and preventing the premature
conversion of agricultural land. The Final Order required the following modifications to the GMP to address the
issues within three specified areas:
1. IdentifY and propose measures to protect prime agricultural areas
2. Direct incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat in order to protect water quality and quantity
and maintain the natural water regime as well as to protect listed animal species and their habitats.
3. Assess the growth potential of the Area by assessing the potential conversion of rural lands to other uses, in
appropriate locations, while discouraging urban sprawl, directing incompatible land uses away from critical
habitat and encouraging development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques including. but not
limited to, public and private schools, urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based
allocations, clustering and open space provisions and mixed use development.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation & Program Assessment
As noted the RLSA was established based on the principal of preserving environmentally sensitive lands.
discouraging urban sprawl, promoting mixed use, protecting listed species and their habitats, while respecting the
rights inherent to the property owners within the sub-district. The RLSA as expressed in the Future Land Use
Element contains one goal and one objective, which are furthered by 5 policy groups.
The goal of the RLSA is: Collier County seeks to address the long-term needs of residents and property owners
within the Immolcalee Area Study boundary of the Collier County Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment. Collier
County's goal is to protect agricultural aCtivities. to prevent the premature conversion of agricultural land to non-
agricultural uses. to direct incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat. to enable the conversion of
rural land to other uses in appropriate locations, to discourage urban sprawl, and to encourage development that
utilizes creative land use planning techniques.
The objective of the RLSA is: To meet the Goal described above, Collier County's objective is to create an incentive
based land use overlay system, herein referred to as the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, based
on the principles of rural land stewardship as defined in Chapter 163.3177(11), F.s. The Policies that will implement
this Goal and Objective are set forth below in groups relating to each aspect of the Goal. Group I policies describe
the structure and organization of the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. Group 2 policies relate
to agriculture. Group 3 policies relate to natural resource protection, and Group 4 policies relate to conversion of
land to other uses and economic diversification. Group 5 are regulatory policies that ensure that land that is not
voluntarily included in the Overlay by its owners shall nonetheless meet the minimum requirements of the Final Order
pertaining to natural resource protection.
Of particular relevance to the EAR process is Policy 1.22 of the FLUE which reads:
The RLSA Overlay was designed to be a long-term strategic plan with a planning horizon Year of 2025. Many of the
tools, teclmiques and strategies of the Overlay are new, Innovative, incentive based, and have yet to be tested in
actual implementation. A Comprehensive review of the Overlay shall be preparedfor and reviewed by Collier County
and the Department of Community Affairs upon the five-year anniversary of the adoption of the Stewardship District
in the LOC. The purpose of the review shall be to assess the participation in and effectiveness of the Overlay
1
Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
implementation in meeting the Goal, Objective and Policies set forth herein. The specific measures of review shall be
as follows:
1. The amoWlt and location of land designated as FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and other SSAs.
2. The amoWlt and location of land designated as SRAS.
3. The number of Stewardship Credits generated, assigned or held for future use.
4. A comparison of the amoWlt, location and type of Agriculture that existed at the time of a Study and time of review.
5. The amoWlt, location and type of land converted to non-agricultural use with and without participation in the
Stewardship Credit System since its adoption.
6. The extent and use of fimding provided by Collier Cowtty and other sources Local, State, Federal and private
revenues described in Policy 1.18.
7. The amoWlt, location and type of restoration through participation in the Stewardship Credit System since its
adoption.
8. The potential for use of Credits in urban areas.
The 5-year review was compiled by County Staff and evaluated by the 5- Year Review Committee. A Committee
comprised of a diverse stake holder membership. The Technical review or Phase I was conducted according to the
below described schedule, with acceptance of the report on May 27, 2008 by the Collier Board of County
Commissioners and transmittal of the Phase I Technical Review to the Deparbnent of Community Affairs (DCA) on
May 30, 2008.
The Phase I report concluded that significant progress has been made in achieving the RLSA goal and since the
conclusion of the Phase I report a number of approved SSA' s have been processed within the system for a total of 16
SSA's comprising approximately 55, 956 acres. There has been no additional SRA acreage added to the system since
the time of the technical review, leaving a total of 5,027 acres designated SRA with 1,027 of that total dedicated to
public use benefit. The Phase I Report, which has been included electronically on CD as part of the 2011 EAR. stands
as the first prong within the County's RLSA overlay EAR assessment.
The two maps on the following pages illustrate the location ofthe SSA's within the RLSA Overlay, as well as the
underlying characteristics [Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSA), Habitat Stewardship Areas (HAS), Water Retention
Areas (WRA) and Area of Critical State Concern (ACSq] of the area the SSA's cover.
2
Rural lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
RLSA STATUS MAP
MARCH 2010
3
Rural Lande; Sh>ward<;hio Arpa {RLSAI
~~
RLSA STATUS MAP
MARCH 2010
7
C
>
'"
r
~
~
'"
Stfllf1Q'd$hfp ArH$
SX: ""'.fA ,:h~,~'~,~' "-,,,~
_ F~"'..lo, :~~,,"'''''r1~n:....'~.;l(>::\~.,
Iql:f"<t.~ ::.~'" !l<'<::~<'f~', J..''';, (" ',:.,;.;.
",':t;y."'-~;'I'QC-'lA(i;l;'#Rl..
4
Rural Lands Stewardshio Area (RLSAl
At the conclusion of the Phase I Report. the County initiated the Phase n process, which was an assessment of the
individual five group policies of the RLSA which concluded with the generation of the Phase-Two Report.
Within the development of the Phase Two report the Committee developed strategies to create incentives to encourage
rural landowners to voluntarily agree to:
eliminate their right to convert agricultural land to non agricultural uses in exchange for
compensation;
. retain agriculture within Open Lands as an alternative to conversion of such lands using Baseline
Standards (and thereby reduce the size of the "development footprint" and the threat of urban sprawl
in the RLSA Overlay);
. create, restore and enhance panther corridor connections;
. restore flow ways and habitat through a credit generating system that considers cost. difficulty and
benefit value of each restoration type through a newly adopted tiered system;
. impose a cap of 45,000 SRA acres in the RLSA Overlay and recaIibrate the credit system to ensure
the balance essential to the sustainability of a voluntary incentive based program which generates
significant public benefits without incurring public expenditures; and
. cooperate with Collier County in its creation of a plan for a county transportation network that meets
the adopted Level of Service through build out of the county and considers the location of public
services needed to accommodate the build out population.
The RLSA Committee also engaged the public and various interest groups in a rigorous assessment of each
and every RLSA Overlay policy to ensure internal consistency, thoughtful precision and careful scrutiny of the data.
analysis and justification for each of the proposed Policy amendments. The work product of the RLSA Committee for
its Phase II Report therefore actually consists of proposed GMP Policy amendments.
The RLSA Committee's Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Program incorporates two
volumes. Volume I incorporates both the earlier Phase I Report and the Phase n Report. Volume I of the Report is
organized and respectfully submitted in the following sections:
. Phase I Reoort contains the County's qualitative evaluation of the Overlay and ways to more
effectively implement the RLSA Goal and Objectives.
. Phase 2 Reoort. Section 1 contains the RLSA Committee's recommended substantive policy
amendments.
. Phase 2 Reoort. Section 2 contains all of the RLSA Committee's recommended policy
amendments, whether substantive or insubstantial.
.
Phase 2 Report. Section 3 contains the supporting documentation for the amendments.
. Phase 2 Reoort, Section 4 provides an account of public participation and comments,
committee deliberations, and committee action.
. Phase 2 Report. Section 5 contains the RLSA Committee's recommended new Policy 3.7 of
the Transportation Element of the GMP based on a proposal for a county transportation network
initiated by Collier County Transportation Planning.
5
Dllr'3ll ~nnC' C:+ouI-::Jlr,frhin ^ro~ IDI C::^\
In summary, based upon the adopted RLSA Overlay and the RLSA Committee's recommended policies as
contained in Volume I of the Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewanlship Program. the RLSA will:
1. Achieve a balance of natural resource protection, agriculture and sustainable community development at the
planning horizon year and at build-out.
2. Provide new and meaningful economic incentives for agriculture to remain as a viable component of the
economy of Collier County.
3. Increase the total area of lands expected to be placed into Stewardship Sending Areas from 92,000 acres to
134,300 acres.
4. Enable protection and restoration of critical natural reSOurces on private land using incentives that do not
require public dollars for acquisition or management.
5. Align the RLSA program with the Florida Panther Protection Program's objectives.
6. Establish a maximum SRA development footprint of 45,000 acres-less than 1/4 of the total RLSA; or 15%
when open space within new communities is accounted for.
7. Reduce the potential for conversion of open lands to non-RLSA baseline development, thereby reducing
urban sprawl.
8. Accommodate forecasted population growth in a sustainable manner and ensure that supporting public
facilities, services, and infrastructure are provided.
9. Create new opportunities to site economic development driven new businesses in proximity to places for
employees to live.
10. Accommodate a long range interconnected transportation network plan that serves Eastern Collier County.
Volume n of the Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Program includes all support information
including major documents, presentations, minutes, etc. considered by the Committee during the course of its twenty
three (23] public meetings. Both Volumes of the Five Year Review of the Rural Lands StewardshiD Proflram have
been nrovided on CD attached to the EAR adontion workbook and stands as the basis for the Coun/v's
coltllJrehensive EAR evaluation of the RLSA Overlav.
The following are the maior substantive proposed amendments to the RLSAO advanced for consideration by the
Committee during its approximate 9-month review of the RLSAO extending from April through December, 2008.
Although there are other recommended amendments to the RLSAO than those listed as follows, the remaining
amendments are considered to be minor, corrective in nature, and intended to cause the RLSAO policies to be better
harmonized with each other.
Policy 1.6.1 (new Policy)
The recommended new Policy 1.6. I permits a five year "Conditional Period" for a Conditional Stewardship Easement
with a possible extension for one additional year.
Policy 1.7 (amendment)
The recommended amendment to Policy 1.7 provides that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
would be a grantee (along with Collier County) to future "perpetual restrictive easements" (Stewardship Easements)
rather than the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services which has been the grantee in past BCC-
approved RLSA Stewardship Easements.
Policy 1.22 (amendment)
Currently, Policy 1.22 language provides for RLSAO review, "upon the five year anniversmy of the adoption of the
Stewanlship District in the Land Development Code (LOC)". The amendment proposes to have the review completed
as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report process as required by Chapter 163 of the Florida State Statutes.
6
Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
Group 2 (amendment)
The recommended amendment to the Group 2 language eliminates the language related to protection of agricultuml
lands from premature conversion to other uses, and replaces this language with new language related to the retention
of land for agricultural production.
Policy 2.1 (amendment)
The recommended amendments to Policy 2.1 eliminate the language related to protection of agricultural lands from
premature conversion to other uses. Also included is the elimination of the language comparing acreage needed to
accommodate the projected population of the RLSA in the Horizon year of 2025 with the acreage required to
accommodate such projected population if the RLSAO were not utilized.
Policy 2.2 (amendment)
The recommended amendments to Policy 2.2 provide for additional Stewardship Credits to retain agriculture lands
within the RLSA.
Policy 3.11 (amendment)
The recommended amendments to Policy 3.1 I:
· eliminate the restoration priority language related to restoration work within the Camp Keis Strand Flowway
Stewardship Area (FSA) or contiguous Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs); provide language allowing for two
additional Stewardship Credits (rather than the 4 Credits now permitted) for restoration activities within a
FSA or HSA, regardless of location in the RLSA; elimination of the additional two Stewardship Credits for
each acre of land dedicated for restomtion activities within other FSAs and HSAs; and provide additional
Credits for either caracara restoration at 2 Credits per acre, or for exotic controJ/buming at 4 Credits per acres,
or for flow way restomtion at 4 Credits per acre, or for native habitat restomtion at 6 Credits per acre. Within
the area proposed for restomtion, Land Use Layers 1-6 must be removed. The specific process for assignment
of additional restoration Credits shall be included in the Stewardship District of the LDC;
· provide for Stewardship Credits to incentivize the creation, restoration, and enhancement of a northern
panther corridor connection and a southern panther corridor connection by providing for 2 additional
Stewardship Credits for each acre of land so dedicated and, should the owner also effectively complete the
corridor restoration, an additional 8 Credits per acre would be awarded;
· provide for Stewardship Credit incentives for restoration of shallow wetland wading bird fomging habitat
located in FSA, HSA, or Water Retention Area (WRA) at the mte of 2 additional Credits per acre and, upon
successful completion of the restoration, an additional 6 Credits per acre shall be awarded; and
· limit Credit incentives to only one type of restoration for each acre so designated for restomtion
Policy 3.13 (amendment)
The recommended amendment to Policy 3.13 requires the acreage of a WRA, if such acreage provides for water
treatment and retention exclusively for a Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA), to be included in the SRA acreage and
would require the use of Stewardship Credits to enable the use of such an area for this purpose in a SRA.
7
Rural lands Stewardshio Area (RLSA)
Policy 4.2 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 4.2 corrects/updates acreage calculations within the RLSAO which are both
outside of and inside the Area of Critical State Concern and limits the amount of lands that can be designated as SRAs
to 45,000 acres. The separate Comprehensive Planning Department Staff SRA build-out projection and Wilson
Miller build-out projection of the maximum SRA acreage allowable under the existing RLSAO [if 1000/0 of property
owners participate using the existing Credit system] is 41,040 SRA acres and 43,312 SRA acres, respectively. This
SRA acreage does not include any development which may occur under the underlying zoning of Rural Agricultural-
A District and which would not be participating in the RLSAO.
Policy 4.5 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 4.5 provides for the SRA Master Plan to be consistent with the County's
Long Range Transportation Plan. the County Build Out Vision Plan referenced in recommended new Policy 3.7 of the
Transportation Element of the GMP, and Access Management procedures. The recommended amend to Policy 4.5
also includes a requirement for the provision of a Management Plan as part of the SRA Master Plan which includes
provisions for minimizing human and wildlife interactions between the SRA and surrounding undeveloped properties.
Policy 4.6 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 4.6 requires an SRA to include a mobility plan that includes consideration of
vehicular, bicycle/pedestrian, public transit, internal circulators. and other modes of traveVmovement within and
between SRAs and areas of outside development and land uses.
Policy 4.7 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 4.7 eliminates Hamlets as a specific forms of SRA and reduces the number
of specific forms of SRAs from four to three in conjunction with the recommended deletion of Policy 4.7.3 language
related to Hamlets.
Policy 4.7.1 (amendment....Towns)
This recommended amendment to Policy 4.7.1 increases the minimum size of a Town from 1,000 acres to 1,500 acres,
increases the maximum size from 4,000 acres to 5,000 acres, and provides for the requirement of an internal mobility
plan.
Policy 4.7.3 (deletion...Hamlets)
Policy 4.7.3 is recommended for deletion.
Policy 4.7.4 [now renumbered Policy 4.7.3 (amendment...Compact Rural Development))
The recommended amendment to Policy 4.7.4 keeps the maximum size of a Compact Rural Development (CRD) at
100 acres while providing language supporting the location of research, education, tourism, recreation, and housing
within CRDs.
Policy 4.7.4 (new)
This new Policy 4.7.4 stresses that Towns and Villages are the preferred locations for business and industry in the
RLSA to further promote economic development, diversification, and job creation with a list of examples of permitted
8
Rural lands StewardshiD Area (RL5Al
uses such as environmental research, agricultural research, aviation and aerospace, health and life sciences, corporate
headquarters. computer hardware, software and services, etc.
Policy 4.14 (amendment)
The recommended amendments to Policy 4.14 provide:
· language requiring a proposed new SRA, at the time of SRA approval, to provide for the opportunity to
provide direct vehicular and pedestrian connections to an adjoining SRA or adjoining lands designated as
Open;
· new language requiring that public or private roads and connecting signalized intersections within or adjacent
to an SRA be maintained by the primary town or community it serves; and
· new language providing for a variety of mitigation credits and offsets.
Policy 4.19 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 4.19 provides for:
· 8 Credits required for each acre of land included in a SRA where such Credits were created from a
Stewardship Credit Sending Area deemed vested under the 8 Credit ratio; and
· 10 Credits required for each acre of land included in a SRA where such Credits were created from any other
Stewardship Sending Area
Policy 4.22 (new)
This new Policy 4.22 provides that assessment of historic or cultural resources be done when such are identified in the
RLSA through the SRA designation process. including the assessment of such resource's historic or cultural
significance and the exploration of educational and public awareness opportunities regarding such significant
resources.
Policy 5.4 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 5.4 provides language to establish a map of potential wildlife crossing within
12 months of the effective date of the GMP amendments to be used in evaluating community, cultural and historical,
and transportation planning for the RLSA, including all SRAs described in Group 4 Policies.
Policy 5.5 (amendment)
This recommended amendment to Policy 5.5:
· deletes certain outdated references relative to the preparation of management plans;
· provides requirement for preparation of a management plan for the purpose of minimizing human and wildlife
interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural lands uses; and
· provides for a monitoring program for developments greater than 10 acres.
9
Rural Lands Stewardshio Area (RLSAI
Policy 5.7 (new)
This new Policy 5.7 requires that any development on lands not participating in the RLS program be compatible with
surrounding land uses and that outdoor lighting shall be reasonably managed to protect the nighttime environment,
conserve energy, and enhance safety and security.
Policy 5.8 (new)
This new Policy 5.8 provides that assessment of historic or cultural resources be done when such are identified in the
RLSA, including the assessment of such resource's historic or cultural significance and the exploration of educational
and public awareness opportunities regarding such significant resources.
The above proposed amendments have not been scheduled by the County for an official amendment cycle of the GMP
as of the date of authoring the EAR. Since the acceptance of the Phase II report on April 22, 2009, there has been
another effort lead by U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the development of a "Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)" for the RLSA
Overlay area. It is anticipated that the outcome of the HCP and the specifics contained within the HCP will have a
influence upon the composition and specifics of the RLSA and how development will move forward within the
regulatory environment. Based upon that recognition, the County intends to wait to the conclusion of the HCP
process before scheduling any amendments to the RLSA Overlay.
Below are the Public Comments received related to the RLSA Overlay.
· County slrouJd be studying impacts of RLSA potential development and their effect on Estates (i.e. ground water,
drainage, long-term effects). Policy 3.1 of FutlO'e Land Use Ele1lU!nt - RIITflI Lands Stewardship Area Overlay
· LRTP not showing specifics of RLSA. Informational
· Increase developer credits during RLSA revisions. RLSA 5- Year review amendments - Observational.
· Credits for underground assets? (Mming) RLSA 5- Year review amendments - ObservatiolUll.
· Panther overpasses and underpasses (do they work)? Prolfl'flm11fOtic.
· Define primary and secondary panther habitat. Programmatic.
· No new high speed (> 36 mph) roads built in RLSA and Rural Fringe Sending Areas (low speed essential for
wildlife preservation) ObservatiolUll
· Proposed RLSA amendments in Collier County did not address any concerns from DCA (7 written concerns from
Tom Pelham). Observational.
· RLSA and RFMUD need to be compatible with Golden Gate Master Plan. Observational
· RLSA has encouraged premature conversion of agriculture by:
Only low quality agriculture has been protected
By using eminent domain to provide transportation corridors
Refusing to address DCA concerns
Using Section 189 Districts to bypass Florida's Growth Management Laws _ Observational.
10
Rural lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
Climate Change - Energy Efficiency
ST ATEMENT OF ISSUE
Climate Change is focused on the determination of the best ways to integrate policies related to climate
change and energy efficiency to promote strategies to reduce green house gas emissions for the
County.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
Land use and transportation comprise thc majority of contributions to greenhouse gas emissions in
Collier County. Carbon emissions from the burning of fossil fuels to power the built environment
represent a potential long-term hazard to the world, but also, and in particular peninsular Florida.
Greater efficiency of power use, reduction in emissions and transition to renewable forms of cnergy
will have the greatest impact in reducing the County's carbon footprint when tied to land use planning
over all other sectors.
The idea of a carbon footprint is a relatively new concept and can have a different meaning, depending
on what is being measured. The general concept however, is a measure of the greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions directly, and sometimes indirectly, caused by a given individual, business, community, etc.
The idea is that once a carbon footprint can be determined, efforts can be taken to reduce the footprint
through mitigation, also calJed carbon offsets. The term is a subset of a broader concept known as the
ecological footprint, which is a more comprehensive measure of an individual, business, or
community's impact on the Earth's ecosystems, comparing hun1an demand with the Earth's ability to
regenerate and accommodate such demand.
As noted in the Introduction section, in 2007, the County went through a process to inventory the GHG
emissions in County Government and also for the County as a whole. Further detail on this inventory is
included in the final report prepared by TwentyFifty, LLC, titled, "Energy Audit and Greenhouse Gas
Inventory". The below table represents the percentage breakdown of total C02 emissions for the
County by sector in 2007.
Collier Emissions per Sector 2007
Waste
1%
t@. Residential
t@ Commercial
Transportation
Bt Waste
The purpose of the inventory was to better understand the \vays the County utilized energy so that
effective policies and programs could be implemented to reduce costs and environmental impact.
Climate Change - 1
Additionally, the inventory provides a baseline against which future energy use and ermSSlOns
reductions can be measured.
The project was funded by Collier County Audubon Society, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida
and National Audubon's TogetherGreen grant program and utilized the software and protocol provided
by ICLEI, the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives.
The three primary motivations for the Energy Audit Report were:
I) Understanding patterns of energy use can lead to saving residents/taxpayers money.
2) It is widely accepted that fossil fuel energy use contributes to global climate change, the extent
of which will be critical for low lying regions like Collier County. Assessing and reducing
emissions demonstrates responsibility to present and future residents.
3) Increasing numbers of state and federal programs (and grant opportunities) require
municipalities to address climate change. By following the established ICLEI protocol, Collier
County joins twenty four communities in Florida and hundreds nationwide willing to take
action and thus demonstrate responsibility and accountability.
The report provided specific recommendation recommendations and next steps for County as follows:
1) Establish the following reduction targets: 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050.
2) Collate a summary of the baseline inventory, all energy savings related projects, together with
additional programs (including but not limited to those described below) into a comprehensive Collier
County Climate Action Plan. Identify within the plan how GHG reduction measures tie into other
County and regional efforts (such as the Master Mobility Plan, Coastal Management Plans and Land
Development Codes). Include an assessment of the impacts of climate change and energy management
in existing plans and codes to ensure the County anticipates and budgets properly for all potential
changes in Collier County through at least the next forty years.
3) Pursue the LFGTE project along with other waste management projects.
4) Continue government based work: i) building energy retrofits, ii) street lighting replacements to
high efficiency bulbs, iii) alternative fuel vehicles, and iv) promote the commuter services program.
5) Continue the community focused transportation programs such as traffic signal optimization.
6) Establish new community oriented programs to include: i) a community focused "Be Green when
Green makes Cents" program, or equivalent and ii) a Green Business Program. (Additional programs
could be described within in the planned Master Mobility Plan and potentially be funded through
additional grant monies or other sources).
7) Carry out an energy use/greenhouse gas emissions re-inventory in 3-5 years to measure progress.
The Energy Audit was presented to and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners in November
of 2009. While the Board did not provide wholesale acceptance of all of the recommendations
contained in the report, the Board did, based upon the acceptance of the Report, create the Rebuilding
Collier's Energy Use Task Force. The purpose of the Task Force is to explore the recommendations
contained within the Report and bring suggestions back to the Board on the means to accomplishing
the energy efficiencies contained in the Report.
Climate Change - 2
The work of the Task Force is on-going at the time of authoring this report. In JWle of201O, the Task
Force began discussions with the Board regarding the development of a program to green up energy
use at homes and businesses throughout the COWlty. The program the Task Force envisions would
take advantage of legislation called Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE), signed by Gov. Crist in
May, 2010. PACE sets out a financing mechanism for local governments to create a pool of money
homeowners and businesses can tap for projects from electric car chargers to energy efficient
windows. Other possible uses for the money include insulation upgrades, solar panels, wind turbines
and energy efficient air conditioning. The full specifics and applicability of the program were still in
the development stage by the Task Force at the time of authoring this report. but the PACE program
and other similar efforts to increase energy efficiency within the COWlty are expected based on the
Task Force's work within the Energy Audit. The future recommendations of the Task Force, once
approved by the Board are expected to intertwine with the regulatory environment of the COWlty.
Land use decisions programmed to save energy and protect the Earth's climate have concurrent and
reinforcing benefits of enhancing local quality of life and the community's unique sense of place. By
enhancing the COWlty'S land use policies and regulations to discourage urban sprawl and better
recognize the relationship between land use decisions and energy consequences, while preserving
agricultural and natural resources, Collier COWlty will proactively take steps to buffer against global
warming's potential impact over the next century. It should be noted that between 2003 and 2009 the
COWlty'S unincorporated population grew at an 11.9 percent rate, while the number of road miles grew
at a 16.8 percent rate and the total developed land area grew at a 19.9 percent rate. Stronger policies
interlinking land use and energy efficiency by the GMP and Land Development Code (LDC) may have
created a more uniform rate of growth among these three inter-related matrix.
Primarily, compact development patterns are as important as promoting greater fuel efficiency in
combating climate change. Locating homes in conveniently placed, walkable neighborhoods can
significantly reduce the growth in the number of miles the COWlty'S citizens' drive, shrink the nation's
carbon footprint, and give people more housing choices. Just as compact development can be a major
contributor in reducing C02 emissions (residents generally drive a third fewer miles than those in
automobile-oriented suburbs), sprawl development, which increases the number of vehicle miles of
travel, is a major contributor in increasing C02 emissions.
The implications of the disconnect between land use and transportation planning not only manifest in
greater amoWlts of C02 emissions, but greater infrastructure cost to the COWlty. Traditional
Neighborhood Design based upon Smart Growth and New Urbanism principles with smaller lot sizes,
compact urban form, a variety of multifamily housing types, and a mix of land uses results in
infrastructure systems that serve more development in proportion to their cost to construct. In
comparison, typical lower density Conventional Suburban Design alternatives require far-reaching
infrastructure systems to serve lower-density development, with higher costs to build. Case studies
have shown a clear reduction in infrastructure cost for scenarios with higher density. I The city of
Tallahassee/Leon COWlty Multimodal Transportation District Plan illustrates the cost of low density,
provided on the following page.
L Smart Growth & Conventional Suburban Development: Which Costs More? An infrastructure case study completed for
the EP A.
Climate Change - 3
Land Needed to Accommodate Leon County's Projected Increase of 104,000 People by 2030 Based on
Various Development Scenarios
1 acre lots = 72 square miles - Lane miles to sen'e: 795
iiii
Future Land Use
1/2 acre lots = 36 square miles - Lane miles to serve: 384
1/8 acre 10..... = 9 square miles - Lane miles to serve: 84
Future Larod Use
Climate Change - 4
4
*-
..
-'*-
...
""*-
The Collier GMP has policies allocated throughout the various elements that address energy efficiency
in transportation planning, land use, residential development, and housing. Through the EAR process,
the County will identify opportunities to build on the existing policy framework and/or introduce new
policies specifically design to address climate change.
Population Projections and Energy Efficiency
The most recent build-out projections for the County, as provided by the Collie Inter-Active Growth
Model are presented in the below table. What is significant to the issue of Climate Change is the
percentage of projected gro\\'ih that is allocated to Immokalee, the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
(RFMUD) and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA). These three Districts of the GMP, with the
anticipated adoption of the transmitted lmmokalee Arc Master Plan changes, havc be designed based
upon smart growth principles, which promote a range of housing opportunities, encourages the mixing
of land uses, provide a variety of transportation choices and encourages the design of walkable
neighborhoods.
Sub-District
Build-Out
Population
Current Estimated
Population
Projected
Increase
Percent of Projected
Increase
Build-out East of CR
951 444,220 90.209 354,011 57.25%
Build-out west of CR
951 507,686 243,391 264,295 42.75%
CIGM 2010
BuildOut Pro. ections 951,906 333,600 618.306
The principles and concepts upon which these Districts were created are those being required by the
State through HB697 to be incorporated \ovithin a jurisdictions local comprehensive plan. The Collier
County Gro\\'th Management Plan has a head start in incorporating the necessary modifications needed
to the planning and regulatory environment to address the challenge of Climate Change, with nearly
half of the County's future residents anticipated to live within a built environment shaped by planning
principals geared to promote sustainability. It should be noted that the concepts of sustainability are
spread throughout the GMP's various Elements and will evaluated during the EAR process to identify
opportunities to further their effectiveness.
House Bill 697
In 2008 the state legislature passed comprehensive energy legislation that includes several elements
applicable to land use planning:
· Requires that data and analysis for the Future Land Use Element now include information about energy-
efficient land use patterns accounting for existing and future electric power generation and transmission
systems; and greenhouse gas reduction strategies.
Climate Change - 5
· Requires that the Traffic Circulation Element incorporate transportation strategies to address
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector.
· Requires that the Transportation Element for urbanized areas per FS.339.175 shall address the
incorporation of transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
from the transportation sector.
· Requires that the Housing Element include standards, plans, and principles relating to energy
efficiency in the design and construction of new housing and use of renewable resources.
· Requires an addition to Future Land Use Map series relating to energy conservation.
· Requires construction of all local government buildings begun after July I, 2008 to meet one of
the nationally recognized green building certification standards (such as the United States
Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - LEED)
· Requires use of ethanol and biodiesel blended fuels in government vehicles where available as
well as other requirements relating to government fleets and facilities.
The Department of Community Affairs is in the process of establishing the rule development to
implement the requirements of the new legislation. The most recent proposal has been included at the
end of this major issue discussion.
The GMP objectives and policies related to the issue must establish the rational nexus for the creation
of tools which focus on creating development that will result in fewer vehicle miles and trips and more
walking, biking, and transit trips. That means compact mixed-use communities with highly connected
and pedestrian-oriented street networks where jobs, housing, entertainment, and retail are in close
proximity and where transit and other forms of non-vehicular transportation are a practical solution. In
addition to reducing vehicle miles of travel and, therefore, GHG emissions, such communities promote
healthier citizens through cleaner air and the ability to walk to more places, enable older Floridians to
remain independent and in their homes longer, reduce traffic congestion and time spent in cars (and the
number of cars needed by a family, which also saves money), and protect natural resources.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
The Collier Growth Management Plan addresses the need for greater energy efficiency in multiple
areas, including new developments, residential construction, and mobility options within transportation
systems. Below are the existing and proposed policies (grouped by Element) contained within the
various Elements of the GMP, which are designed to address the issue of energy efficiency and green
house gas reduction strategies. The effectiveness of each and every one of the policies listed below is
provided for within the individual element in which they are contained. To avoid unnecessary
redundancy each one of those assessments will not be replicated within this section. It should be noted
that a number of these Objectives and Policies are being suggested for modification to improve the
overall effectiveness of the Objective or Policy.
Future Land Use Element
Policy 2.4
Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a) 3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban InfUI and
Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element, development located within the South
U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) (See Map TR-4) may be exempt
from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system
are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element.
Climate Change - 6
Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that obtain an exception from concurrency
requirements for transportation, pursuant to the certification process described in
Transportation Element, Policy 5.5, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00
the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended) as part of their plan of development
shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion Density Reduction requirement as contained in the
Density Rating System of this Element.
Developments within the Northwest and East-Central TCMAs that meet the requirements of
FLUE Policies 6.1 through 6.5, and Transportation Policies 5.7 and 5.8, and that include
affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as
amended) as part of their plan of development shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion
Density Reduction requirement as contained in the Density Rating System of this Element.
Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to Policy
5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a
concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency review for
the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and
maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network.
Policy 2.5
The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to
encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is
in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips.
Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles
meeting the LOS described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the Transportation Element. Standards
within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development
within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and Policies 6.1
through 6.5 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are
hereby designated:
1. Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north
side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side;
and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (See Map TR-5).
2. East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier
Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended)
on the west side (See Map TR-6).
Policy 2.6
Traffic impacts generated by new development are regulated through the implementation of a
'checkbook' transportation concurrency management system, which incorporates two
Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) and a Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area (TCEA). New developments within the TCMAs and the TCEA that commit to
certain identified traffic management strategies shall reduce (the TCMAs) the traffic impact
mitigation measures that would otherwise be applied to such developments.
Policy 4.7:
The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for
existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses,
modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage
Climate Change - 7
redevelopmeDt. The Bayshore/Gateway TriaDgle RedevelopmeDt PlaD was adopted by the Board
OD March 14,2000; it eDcompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor aDd the triaDgle area formed by
US 41 East, Davis Boulevard aDd Airport-Pulling Road. Other specific areas that may be
cODsidered by the Board of County CommissioDen for redevelopment include, but are not
Decessarily limited to:
a. Pine Ridge Road, between U.S. 41 North aDd Goodlette-Frank Road;
b. U.S. 41 North in Naples Park; aDd,
c. Bonita Beach Road betweeD Vanderbilt Drive aDd the west end of Little Hickory Shores
#1 SubdivisioD.
Policy 5.3:
Discourage unacceptable levels of urbaD sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community
facilities by: cODiming urbaD intensity development to areas designated as UrbaD OD the Future
Land Use Map; requiring that aDY changes to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to aD
existing Urban Area bouDdary; and, eDcouraging the use of creative land use plaDning
techniques aDd innovative approaches to developmeDt in the County's AgriculturallRural
designated area, which will better serve to protect enviroDmeDtally sensitive areas, maiDtain the
economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rurallaDd uses, aDd provide for cost
efficieDt delivery of public facilities and services.
Policy 5.5:
Encourage the use of land preseDtly designated for urbaD inteDsity uses before designating other
areas for urbaD intensity uses. This shall occur by planDing for the expansion of County owned
and operated public facilities aDd services to existing laDds designated for urban intensity uses,
the Rural SettlemeDt District (formerly knOWD as North GoldeD Gate), and the Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District, before servicing Dew areas.
Policy 5.6:
Permit the use of clustered residential development, Planned Unit DevelopmeDt techniques,
mixed-use development, rural villages, new tOWDS, satellite commuDities, transfer of developmeDt
rights, agricultural aDd cODservatioD easemeDts, aDd other innovative approaches, in order to
conserve opeD space and environmeDtally sensitive areas. CODtiDue to review aDd amend the
zoning and subdivisioD regulatioDs as necessary to allow and encourage such inDovative land
development techDiques.
Within the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay to date, there has been a total of 16 Stewardship
Sending Areas, comprising approximately 55, 956 acres of environmentally sensitive and
agriculturally viable lands which have been set aside from development, with a total of 5,027 acres
designated SRA with 1,027 acres of that total dedicated to public use benefit. Additionally, the 8RA
was designed upon smart growth principals and the spatial relationship between dwelling units and
supporting land uses.
Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District there are a total of 20,617 acres designated sending that
are eligible to sever their development right. It should be noted that this acreage does not include all
designated sending lands due to those lands being in public ownership and not eligible for the TDR
program. Of the 20,617 acres, 17.5 percent or 3,615 acres have had or are in the process of having
their TDR's separated through voluntary participation in the program. Based upon the above estimates
Climate Change - 8
there are potentially 15,819 TDR's, of which 12.7 percent or 2,019 TDR's have been generated
through participation in the program. Of the 2,019 TOR's which have been generated to date, 300
TDR's or 14.8 percent of the TDR's generated have been redeemed.
Objective 6
Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) are geographically compact areas
designated in local government comprehensive plans where intensive development exists, or such
development is planned. New development within a TCMA shan occur in a manner that will
ensure an adequate level of mobility (as def"med in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element) and
further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals and policies:
discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources, protecting historic
resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit,
bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas are hereby established in the specific geographic areas
described in Policy 2.5 of this Element.
The County through the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) provides for the annual
assessment of the County's 167.5 lane miles within a TCMA to ensure that these areas are providing
alternatives to traditional road capacity demand solutions. Provided at the conclusion of this major
issue is the County's TCMA reports from 2006 to 2010 or Attachment "1". These reports indicate that
the volume to capacity ratio for these lane miles has been maintained. While the County has not
specifically identified the number of projects that have developed within the TCMAs over the
evaluation period, each project was/is required per the GMP to utilize two of the Transportation
Demand Management strategies articulated in policy 6.2 to satisfy the Concurrency Management
system. This allows for development to move forward in an area in which services and infrastructure
are readily available, but due to density and intensity of surrounding uses couldn't move forward on
traditional solutions of additional land capacity, which is directly related to the County's mandate to
discourage urban sprawl.
Policy 6.1
Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shan
discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl by promoting residential and commercial infin
development and by promoting redevelopment of areas wherein current zoning was approved
prior to the establishment of this Growth Management Plan (January 10, 1989). Inf"ill
development and redevelopment within the TCMAs shan be consistent with Objective 5, and
relevant subsequent policies, of this Element.
Policy 6.2
In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new commercial development or
redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management
Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies, as may be applicable:
a) Preferential parking for carpools and vanpools that is expected to increase the average
vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development.
b) Parking charge that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips
generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership.
c) Cash subsidy that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips
generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership.
Climate Change - 9
d) Flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips
generated by the development.
e) Compressed workweek that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and peak
hour work trips generated by the development.
1) Telecommuting that would reduce the vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips
generated by the development.
g) Transit subsidy that would reduce auto trips generated by the development and increase
transit ridership.
h) Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel
and automobile work trips generated by the development.
i) Including residential units as a portion of a commercial project that would reduce vehicle
mUes of travel.
j) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier
County Transit).
Policy 6.3:
In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or
redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management
Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies, as may be applicable:
a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project.
b) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier
County Transit).
c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to abutting commercial
properties.
d) Including affordable housing (minimum of 25% of the units) within the development.
e) Vehicular access to abutting commercial properties.
Policy 7.1
The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to
fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without
violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code.
Policy 7.2
The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle
congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals.
Policy 7.3
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land
use type.
Policy 7.4
The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of
densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types.
Policy 7.5:
Climate Change - 10
The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing
residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This policy shall be
implemented through provisions in specific subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan.
Policy 7.6
The County shall explore the creation of an urban "greenway" network along existing major
canal banks and powerline easements.
Policy 7.7
The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will continue to research
smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically
addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land
development regulations.
Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlav
Goal
Collier County seeks to address the long-term needs of residents and property owners within the
Immokalee Area Study boundary of the Collier County Rural and Agricultural Area
Assessment. Collier County's goal is to protect agricultural activities, to prevent the premature
conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, to direct incompatible uses away from
wetlands and upland habitat, to enable the conversion of rural land to other uses in appropriate
locations, to discourage urban sprawl, and to encourage development that utilizes creative land
use planning techniques.
The evaluation of the effectiveness is provided for within the RLSA major issue of this EAR report
and the attached Phase One and Phase Two report generated during the County 5-year review of the
RLSA Overlay.
Policy 1.2
The Overlay protects natural resources and retains viable agriculture by promoting compact
rural mixed-use development as an alternative to low-density single use development, and
provides a system of compensation to private property owners for the elimination of certain land
uses in order to protect natural resources and viable agriculture in exchange for transferable
credits that can be used to entitle such compact development. The strategies herein are based in
part on the principles of Florida's Rural Lands Stewardship Act, Chapter 163.3177(11) F.S. The
Overlay includes innovative and incentive based tools, techniques and strategies that are not
dependent on a regulatory approach, but will complement existing local, regional, state and
federal regulatory programs.
Group 2 - Policies to protect agricultural lands from premature conversion to other uses and
continue the viability of agricultural production through the Collier County Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay.
Group 4 - Policies to enable conversion of rural lands to other uses in appropriate locations,
while discouraging urban sprawl, and encouraging development that utilizes creative land use
planning techniques by the establishment of Stewardship Receiving Areas.
Transportation Element
Climate Change - 11
Objective 4 - The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and
non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive
Pathways Plan.
Policy 4.1 - The County shall incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into
this Transportation Element by reference and shall periodically update the Pathways Plan as
needed.
Policy 4.2 - The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian
system by constructing the improvements identified on the 2030 Pathway Facilities Map series as
funds permit.
Policy 4.3 - The County's pathways construction program should be consistent with the
Comprehensive Pathways Plan to the maximum extent feasible.
Policy 4.4 - The County shall annually adopt a Five (5) Year Pathways Work Program, which
establishes pathway priorities, including projects to retrofit existing streets to accommodate
bicycles and pedestrians.
Policy 4.5 - The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and
provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work Program.
Policy 4.6 - The County shall provide for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through
implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and
shall incorporate bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in new
construction and reconstruction of roadways.
Policy 4.7 - The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is
physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem.
Policy 4.8 - The County shall foDow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and
construction standards, as developed by the Florida Department of Transportation.
Policy 4.9 - The County shall work to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse Gas
Emission bv providine: for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles throue:h implementation
of its Land Development Code and hie:hwav desie:n standards ordinances and shaD incorporate
bike lanes. sidewalks and pathwavs. as deemed appropriate.. in new construction and
reconstruction of roadways. - Proposed
Objective 5 - The County shall coordinate the Transportation System development process with
the Future Land Use Map.
The 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan scheduled to be adopted by the Collier Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO), the basis for how improvements move from the planning spectrum to
the construction phase to additions to the transportation system was based upon land use modeling as
provided for by the Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM). The CIGM was accepted by the
Board of County Commissioners in January of 2009 as an additional planning tool to be utilized by thewCounty. The CIGM projects population in a spatially distributed manner that is based upon the
regulatory allowances contained within the GMP and the individual sub districts contained within.
Climate Change - 12
This fact further strengthens the tie between the County's long range transportation and land use
planning, which in turn is anticipated to reduce inefficient public expenditures regarding needed
improvements.
Policy 5.4 - Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Inf'ill
and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the
South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated.
Development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from
transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are
mitigated using the set procedures.
Policy 5.5 - Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an
exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification from the
Transportation Planning Department that at least four Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies will be utilized.
Policy 5.6 - The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas
(TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network
of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common
trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles
meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of this Element.
The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: Northwest
TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side
of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of
Mexico on the west side (Map TR-5). East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge
Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side,
and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR-6).
Policv 7.4 - The County shall develop corridor management plans that take into consideration
urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major
arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the recommendations of
the Community Character Plan, County-sponsored Smart Growth initiatives, and the impacts of
the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2)
Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County
Commissioners may periodically appropriate funding for these plans.
Objective 9 - The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and
maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and
motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the
implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In
developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions, the NTMP shall consider the
impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems (from a
level-of-service and operational standpoint).
Policy 9.3 - The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets
between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The
Collier County Transportation Division shall develop guidelines, which identify the conditions
that would require the interconnection of two neighboring developments, and shall also develop
standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets.
Climate Change - 13
Policy 9.5 - The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedestrian,
bie,yelist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a
deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut~through traffic away from neighborhoods and to
the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan.
Policy 10.2 - The County shall continue to improve transit services for the transportation
disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC).
Objective 12 - The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the
future.
As part of the 2011 EAR, Collier County has committed to explore the feasibility of developing a
separate, stand alone Public Tran.<;it Element within the Growth Management Plan (GMP), to provide
for transit and transit oriented design appropriate standards and guidelines. Below is a chart
documenting the ridership of the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system.
Fixed Route Ridership
Ridership
1.180.1471.166.358
1,109,710
1,052,536
951,601
FYOl
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
Policy 12.1 - The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the
Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist the local community transportation
coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for
the transportation disadvantaged. The Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall be
implemented through the County's regular bus system.
Policy 12.2 - The County Transportation Division and the Collier County Metropolitan Planning
Organization shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans
with the Florida Department of Transportation.
Climate Change - 14
Policy 12.4 - The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between
Bonita Springs, in Lee County, and Naples, in Collier County, exists, consider any
intergovernmental efforts, which are necessary to bring about such service.
Policy 12.9 - The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development
plan in the Capital Improvement Element.
Policy 12.10 - The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transit
Development Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners.
Conservation & Coastal Management Element
Policy 2.4.2:
The County shall request the Department of Environmental Protection staff to participate in the
development of future coastal and watershed management plans.
OBJECTIVE 3.1:
Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards.
Ground water quality shall be monitored in order to determine whether development activities
are contributing to the degradation of Collier County's ground water quality. Ground water
data and land use activities will be assessed annually to determine long-term trends and whether
the County is meeting Federal and State regulatory standards for ground water quality. The
County shall require ground water monitoring of land uses in accordance with Chapters 62-520,
62-550 and 62-777 of the Florida Administrative Code. Upon the detection of any ground water
degradation determined through the monitoring process, the County will notify the appropriate
regulatory agencies.
In a coordinated effort with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), or of its own accord,
the County shall institute a groundwater monitoring network by 2008, including the
comprehensive inventory of monitoring wells, an assessment of monitoring wells previously
damaged, and policies to make appropriate well repairs and replacements.
Policy 3.1.1:
Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as
follows:
1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones
del"med as follows:
a) W-l is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and
extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which
approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield).
b) W-2 is the land area between the W-l boundary line and the ten percent ground water
capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two year ground water travel
time to the potable water wellfield).
c) W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent
ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five year ground
water travel time to the potable water wellfield).
d) W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground
water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground water
travel time to the potable water wellfield).
Climate Change - 15
2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows:
a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management
zones.
b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W-l, W-2, W-3.
c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and
hazardous wastes: prohibited in W-l, W-2, W-3.
d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250
liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary
containment in W-l, W-2, W-3.
e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W-l.
f) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found in
40 CFR part 135.
g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based on
uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use.
h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited
in W-l and W-2, conditional use required in W-3 and W-4.
i) Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater
than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-l subject to complying with
construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low-
pressure lateral distribution.
j) On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and
subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-l, W-2, and W-3
shall meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-I0, F.A.C. as the
rule existed on August 31, 1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring plan.
3. Conditional uses shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and where
impacts of the development will be isolated from the Surficial and Intermediate
Aquifer.
OBJECTIVE 3.2:
The County shall implement a well construction compliance program under criteria specified in
the Collier County Well Construction Ordinance, which is designed to ensure proper
construction of wells and promote aquifer protection.
Policy 3.4.1:
Continue the existing water quality monitoring program to provide base-line data, evaluate long-
term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effectiveness of the County's
ground water protection program.
OBJECTIVE 8.1:
All activities in the County shall comply with all applicable federal and State air quality
standards.
Policy 8.1.1:
The County will rely on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida
Division of Forestry or the local fire departments as appropriate under their jurisdiction to
permit and visually inspect the permitted air pollutant sources in the County.
Policy 8.1.2:
Climate Change - 16
The County will receive complaints concerning air pollution problems and refer such complaints
to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Division of Forestry, or the
local fire departments as appropriate.
Policy 8.1.3:
Collier County shall act to reduce air pollution from automobile emissions through continuation
of the following procedures:
1. The Collier County Sheriff's Office will continue to enforce vehicle exhaust emissions
standards.
2. As part of its development review process, Collier County will require the construction of
sidewalks, bicycle lanes or bicycle paths in all new subdivisions.
3. The County will construct sidewalks, bicycle lanes or bicycle paths in conjunction with
County-funded transportation improvements.
Policy 8.1.4:
Collier County shall continue to develop and maintain a comprehensive county-wide air quality
monitoring program.
Policy 10.4.7:
Collier County shall prohibit construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line
except where such construction would be permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Florida
Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985, where such prohibition would result in no reasonable
economic utilization of the property in question, or for safety reasons. In such cases,
construction will be as far landward as is practicable and effects on the beach and dune system
and the natural functions of the coastal barrier system shall be minimized.
Policy 10.4.9:
Collier County shall prohibit seawall construction on properties fronting the Gulf of Mexico
except in instances where erosion poses an imminent threat to existing buildings.
Potable Water Sub- Element
Policy 5.1:
The County shall discourage urban sprawl by permitting universal availability of central potable
water systems only: in the Designated Urban Area, in Receiving and certain Neutral Lands
within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in the Designated Urban-Rural Fringe Transition
Zone Overlay, and in the Rural Settlement District, all of which are depicted on the Future Land
Use Map, and in Towns, Villages, Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural
Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. These areas are further identified as: within the Collier
County Water District Boundaries on Figure PW-l ofthe Potable Water Sub-element, except the
outlying urban areas of Immokalee, Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the
Islands; or within the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District Boundaries on Figure PW-2 of
the Potable Water Sub-element; or in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use
Element, is utilized; within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, as each Town, Village,
Hamlet, and Compact Rural Development is designated; and, in areas where the County has
legal commitments to provide facilities and service outside the Urban Area as of the date of
adoption of this Plan.
Policy 5.2:
Climate Change - 17
Tbe County shall discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector and/or package
potable water treatment systems through the development order approval process to ensure
maximum utilization of the existing and planned public facilities. No existing private sector or
potable water treatment systems shall be permitted to add customers unless all Levels of Service
Standards are met, and operations are in conformance with all FDEP permits.
Housing Element - Proposed Objective and Policies
OBJECTIVE 9:
Collier County shall support housing programs that encourage the development of energy
efficient and environmentally sensitive housing.
Policy 9.1:
The County will encourage the construction of energy efficient housing by exploring innovative
regulations that promote energy conserving and environmentally sensitive technologies and
design.
Policy 9.2:
The County shall educate the public about the economic and environmental benefits of resource
efficient design and construction.
Policy 9.3:
The County shall expedite plan review of housing projects that promote energy conservation and
design.
Policy 9.4:
The County shall continue to encourage the development of mixed housing types near
employment centers in order to reduce Green House Gas emissions and minimize carbon
footprints.
Policy 9.5:
The County shall promote the incorporation of US EP A Energy Star Building and Appliances
programs into construction and rehabilitation practices.
Recreation & Open Space Element
Policy 1.3.1:
County-owned or managed parks and recreation facilities shaD have automobile, bicycle and/or
pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where such access is economically
feasible.
Policy 2.1.2:
The County shall amend the Land Development Code to require the developer of a residential
PUD, or a POO having a residential component, to provide its residents and guests with a
suitable neighborhood park, as determined on a case-by-case basis, which is, as required by Policy
5.4 in the Future Land Use Element, compatible with the surrounding development.
Policy 3.1.6:
The County shall encourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes from the
surrounding residential communities to park sites where general public access can be supported.
Climate Change - 18
Conclusion
The Collier County GMP is interspersed with Policy and Objectives that have a direct linkage to the
issue of climate change, during this EAR review each of Elements were reviewed to identify areas
where the Objectives and Policies could be made more effective in attaining their specified goal, which
commutatively formulate the County's growing response to the issue of Climate Change.
Public Comments Received
· County should be studying ideas to target Green House Gas sources - besides transportation.
Observational
· County should be studying ideas to address lack of energy efficiency plans. Observational
· County should be studying ideas to address need to plan for Sea Level Rise. Observational
· County should be studying ideas to access & connect State Parks with County Network
Observational
· Promote and encourage safe bike/walk, including education to improve safety of bike/pedestrians
routes to reduce number of miles driven, especially school drop-off Policy 4.2 Transportation
Element.
· Reduce gaps between CAT stops. Exploreftasibility of bike rentals at CAT stops to minimize gaps
in the existing networks of bike/pedestrians pathways. Programmatic
· Increase mass transit availability (CA T). Policy 12.10 Transportation Element
· Create bike/pedestrians pathways on canal banks to separate bike routes from vehicle traffic.
Programmatic
· Do not use Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMI') reduction as an excuse to build more commercial in
neighborhoods where they were not planned nor vetted through a local master plan process.
Observational
· Flooding as a result of climate change will affect current population estimates, County needs to
revise estimates. Observational
· Include more bridges (Golden Gate Estates) to reduce fUel consumption and saftty.
· Policy 9.3 Transportation Element/ GGAMP Restudy
· Create County-wide storm water management to address sea level rise. Policy 2.1.5
Conservation and Coastal Management Element
· Standards to address Climate Change need to be different for Golden Gate Estates (than urban
coastal zones). Observational
· Allow low density areas in Golden Gate Estates. Observational
· Make CAT cost more affordable. Observational
· Increase Mass Transit instead of road widening. Policy 3.3 Transportation Element
· Increase bike lanes. Policy 4.5 Transportation Element
· Need to address sea level rise due to climate change. Observational
Climate Change - 19
..
c
cu
E
.c.
u
III
~
~OO~~~M~WON~~ONN~~~MON
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~m~~
~~~~~~~VVVN~~NVVV~~~~~
mmo~oo~~~~N~~m8~~O~Nmo
~d~~~~~~~ci~~~~Nci~~~~~~
~~m~g~~~~R~~~~~~m~~~~~
ciciciciciocicioci~cicicici~cicici~cici
"0
Iii
"E ~
-0 III :;
o::~S
.s ~ ~
Ul CD CO
g'c€
'S; CO CO
::; CI CD
,g !!
c
CO
(/)
"E
>. CO
"E~ "E"E1l~
CO~"OCO~O:;
>cocoiiGlO::o
"* a. .9 ::i :; E CD
o.!!.....ooco~
CD co o CD CD CD CO
1Ilc.9:cIll....l;-€
'S; c: CO 'S; ~ 5 ~
~~O::~88~
c.9 co
(/)
"E
co
"C ii "E
"C :g~~f
&~~~"*~~
t~.9m~mo
~ ~€c:c.9:c
:;"{ .~~3153&
::;S0"C
c Ci
co c.9
(/)
E
CD
-
In
>.
U)
-
c
cu
E
CII
01
ClI
C
ClI
~
>-
u
c
~
::l
U
C
o
o
c
o
:a
~
o
CL
In
C
l!
I-
1::~
o c
CL ::l
CD 0
0:0
...
~:!
~8
"C"C
co co
o 0 "C
0:: 0:: co
CD Q) 0
CICIO::
:g :g ,Q
O::O::"C
Q) Q) co
r::: c: 0::
0:0:
~~~
> > >
Q) Gl Q)
"C~~~
:gCDCDCD
~ ~ ~ ~
:c-e€-e
co co ra co
O::mmCD
~ ~ ~
cv co ra
(/)(/)(/)
"C
"C lii
~ ii
Gl :;
:; 0
om
m-g
r::: 0
~ ~
o Gl
...Jill
...J
"C"E
cv co
o >
0:: Q)
Q) :;
CI 0
:gCD
a:::: III
Q) 'S;
C co
0:0
~ >.
ii"E"Ef"E"E1~"E
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ra ~ ~
~ CD ~ CIl Q) ~ Q) a. :g Q)
~5giii:;~.ma::::~
~€~m~~~(5~CD
0:: co~~ CIl'S; CIl c ra~
CDCiCi"OIllCllGla::::Ci
~(,)U800~ u
co c.9
(/)
"E
"C ~
ra Gl
o :;
a:::: 0
c CD
rti ~
m€
l;-1lI
5 CD
8~
III
(/)
"E"C
co ii
ii ii "0
:;;.; m
S S ii
_~~. ~ ~ ~ It)
,- III co CD ~
€ -e c
co co Gl
CDm~
SSc.9
c c
co co
(/)(/)
O~O ~r--~IO~IO~~Nr--
~cor-...t:""""''''''''~-r-'--~NNN
iii;'
"E"E~ ~"E"E"C
cu(UL-i:comm
ii~~~~~~
~ i5 .!! .!! i5 i5 i5
CDmlUlUCDCDCD
1Il1llc.9c.9C........
'S; 'S; C C Q) ~ ~
raco{g{g~CiCi
oOoo(!)UU
(!)(!)
10 10
~~
"C"C
co co
o 0
a:::: 0::
Gl Q)
CI CI
"C"C
jiji
Q) Gl
c: c:
0:0:
>.
~ ~
~ ~-o
co-o~o::
a. a:::: .!! c:
.!! 0 ra 0
ra:cc.9Ui
c.9 co c g'
c 0:: ~ 'S;
~ 0::;
Ci c.9
(!)
-c-c"C"E
~ & & ~
:;cc:~
00.90
CD Ui III CD
Iij g' ,g'_ ,1Il>_
CI'S;
,g::;~~
"E-g
~ 0
Gl 0::
:; Q)
o CI
m-c
....ji
~ Gl
o C
uO:
:1;('l')(J)~ll)mlt)......
~M"lIitlt)l.(')~~~
In....~
"':c:io
<<Dlnc:i
........01
00'2
..! >: III
i~-g
~r.S
~ v (/)
- :I g'
S::a
~ ~ 3:
! ~
ClI In
...IJ!
i
cu
c
j
-
c
CII
e
CII
ll.
mO~~~~~~Moo~mN~~~~o~~OO~M~OO~
~~mm~~N~~~~N~m~M~~N~~~~~~~~~
W~~W~WNV~NNNV~~NWNNW~W~~V~~~
a;~~u;~
O'-T"'"T"'"T"'"
~~
~NNm~~M~ON~O~~
~~~~~~~~~~d~~T"'"
;;;gN~~rD~
M~NdddN
~ ,....
~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~R~~;~a;~~~~~~~
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
E
II
...
~
U)
...
C
II
E
III
Cl
III
C
III
:::e
>-
u
c
~
:s
u
c
o
o
c
o
~
~
8-
Ie
C
l!
I-
1::~
8. 3
II 0
0::0
c( ~
:E_
o 0
1-0
"0
"0 m
m "0 0
o m 0::: CI>
~0:::0.c'f:
OUlO:::~O
~~~~~
8.Ul~::Q.
,!::: .~ ~ -e 3
<( .~ E ~ (.!)
:s: - lij
>
"0
"0 m
OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ 'm
~ Ul......UOO.=
en~::!.m:g~~
~5~~~~,g'~
~ <..) c: 0 :e -- ~ 'E
m3l'o.ECI>33~
...J .2> E "0 (.!) (.!)
:s: - c:
~
"0
"O€€€€€:g
moooooO:::
&Zzzzz.c
CI>'~'~'~'~'i!! ~
.g>1-1-1-1-1-~
i:i: 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E ::
~.~.~.~.~.~~
O:~~~~~lij
>
~~m~~~~~~
"0
~ .~
0:::1-
CI> ._
~~
0:: .-
CI> E
.~ ~
Q.
'0"0
1\I 1\I
o 0
0:::0:::
.c .c
u u
m (lJ
CI> CI>
III III
:!::: -
:e:e
Cll CI>
'0'0
c: c:
~~
'0
m '0
o m
0:: 1::i 0 CI>
~ 0:: 0:: ::J .~
~c:lIlliil-
u.~~~'E
i .~ ~ ~ '~
~3'~~
(.!)
'0
Cll :g !l! ~
~ :5 0:: 'C &
o.2;olllO
~s~:e~
8.0UlCl>~
....<..)c:'00
.- CI> .- c: E
<(~.~~E
:s: -
CI> CI>
'f: 'f:
00
:!::: -
:e:e
CI> CI>
'0'0
c: c:
m m
>>
V~~
,- T"'" T"'" .....
,.... ~,....
'0 '0
(lJ...; (lJ
o 0 0
0:: E 1::i 0::
iioO::'fi
m III c: 1\I
CI> .Q .9 CI>
~ III :g, ~
:c :g,.~ :e
~fij~~
c:.... c:
~o ~
~ CI>
o .:::
0:::0
CI> _
.g>:e
ii:~
CI> c:
c: (lJ
0:>
:i~~
CI> 0 0
::JO::O::
~ 3l 3l
<(~~
~ ~ ~
~ E E
1::i
0::
.~ ~
I- ~
'E u.
m ~
'E CI>
~~
o
(.!)
'0
m
'0 0
1::i 1\I 0::
o:::tlii
.s 3l :g
Ul-Ill
~~ -
.- 0 :e
.::: E CI>
...J.5-g
m
>
'0
Itl
'0 0
Itl 0::
o .~ ~
0:: I- c:
CI> ._ ~
~~u.
~'E i
~~~
(.!)
'0
Itl
o
0:::'0
.c. CD .~
U 0 I-
:g 0:: '_
III c: E
~ ~ ctI
'- ;;>"E
-e ~ Itl
~<..)I-
c:
~
'0 '0'0
m~:g~'O
& 'C 0::: 0:: ~
c: 0 Cll CI> 0:::
,g1J.g~t
Ul 1\I .- .- 0
01 !ij> 0:: 0:: e-
.~ Cll CI> CI> <(
.::: (f) .~ .~
...J Q.Q.
~OMvmo~OO~NMMV
~~NN(T)...q-~~LOLC)l.OCOCO
'0 '0
1\I 1\I
tl 'OtlCDCD
"O:g >.:::.
n~o::-fil5o~
:gO::3l111~~~E-
lD~(ij~,g-=l\I
~ ~ ~ .- J!! ~ "e
.....-E-e-c:
~<(E~0~~
c: c:
~ ~
>, '0 '0
'0 1\I (lJ 1\I
(lJ0 ~ 0 0
0::'O'O~0:::0::::i
III III III ~ ~ CIl
UlOOQ.C:C:::J
~~~.l!!J:J:lii
ool\l'dJ~
~e-e-(.!)~:t:::5
'0.<(<( lii~~~
f ~88~
(.!)(.!)(.!)
'0
'0 OJ III
III CI> 0
ohO::
0::: CJ) CI>
t::(ij~
o 'C 1\I
e-CD~
._ 0.. ~
<(.5.5
'0'0
III III
o 0
0::0::
c: c:
~~
0101
c: c:
';> ';>
::i::i
Oj~
,g: CIl
en 01
>,:2
~o:::
:c ~
ene::
'0
:gCi
0:: E
~ 0
c: Ul
III Ul
U: 0
dJ in
:t:: CD
CI> 01
~ C
o ~
(.!)o
~~
W~
~ co .... CD "':
.... ..j ,...: a; CO
.... .... ....
CD CD -.r -.r CD
I'- I'- CO 0 ....
~ -.r "': -.r ....
.... N .... N M
0 .... 0 M It)
CD CO M 0 ~
c:i c:i .... .... 0
"0 "0 ~
lU lU
0 0
It) 0:: 10 0:: en
~ 1:: ~ 1:: c
~ 8. lU
'- ~
<{ <{ ...J
-ci -ci
-ci 0:: -ci 0:: -ci
.><: .><:
0:: c 0:: c 0::
c ~ c ~ c
,g u.. 0 u.. 0
If) cb U; cb U;
Cl i:l Cl ii Cl
c CIl .5 c
.S: ~ > 'g :~
::i ::i ...J
0
C) C)
"0 "0
~ lU lU
"0 "0 0 0
~ lU lU 0:: 0::
0 0 .r: .r:
0:: 0:: 0 0
CIl CIl CIl lU lU
'lU CIl CIl
CIl CIl en en
C) (ij (ij ...
c .><: .><: ;t::
ell 0 0 € €
"0 E E ell CIl
"0 ~ E "0 "0
C) C C
~ ~
~ I'- m M 10
10 10 CD CD
.... .... .... .... ....
N'lt:.e
..;ui~
~~i
in 0 ~
.!! :> III
:i C! 'a
C
QI .... .l!
c II
III V (I)
...I 1/1 Cl
~ .!! c
;:3
i CII
~ CII
CII ::IE
c
III 1/1
...I .!!
i
QI
C
l'G
...I
-
C
ell
~
CII
a..
c
CI>
E
.c
u
11l
:t::
<(
E
(l)
-
o
~
en
-
s:::
G)
E
(l)
C)
l'G
s::
l'G
::i
~
(.)
s::
(l)
-
-
::::s
to)
s:::
a:: 0
_0
:) s::
<c~
en as
O~
o 0
N~
s::
t:: e
01-
c.~
CD c
a:: 5
<cC:
:iE .!
0-
....8
<c
:E
o
I-
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 co ex> N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ex>
ex> 0 it) C") co ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ co ~ 0 0 co co 0 ex> ~ co co ~
co C") C") ~ co ex> ~ ~ it) C") 0 it) ex> co co co I'- co co ex> co I'- C")
~ ~
~ ~ N N co ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ co co co co co ~ ~ ~ co co ~ ~
~ it) it) it) 0 0 0 ~ I'- ex> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I'-
I'- I'- I'- co ~ ~ 0 0 N I'- co co ~ 0 0 ~ 0) it) I'- ~ ~ 0) ex>
~ 0 ..... 0 ..... N N ~ ..... 0 N N ..... ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ 0
0) ~ ~ co 0) 0) 0 ~ it) ~ co N 0) I'- C") N co 0) 0 it) 0) N ex>
I'- I'- N ~ it) ex> co 0) 0) - I'- ~ ~ ex> co I'- co ~ co it) C") co 0)
0 0 - T"" 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"E "0 "E
...
co co iU > co iU
> > >
~ Q) co Q)
"0 :::l :::l ~ ~ :::l ~
0 0 ..:!l:: 0
co CD "E CD "E "E ... "0 ... "E CD ... "0 "0
0 co "0 ... co "0 "0 co "0 ... ...
0:: co co co 0- ... co 0- co co co ... 0- ... co co
co > co > > co > 0 > co co > >
... ... > ... > >
c co Q) co Q) Q) Q) ~ Q) 0:: Q) co Q) Q) ~
... .0 "0 .0 ... Q) ... "0 .0 Q) ... "0 ~
co ... co :::l ... :::l :::l co :::l :::l co co C ::J ... :::l co co :::l :::l ::J
CD co 0 0 co 0 0 <!) 0 0 <!) 0 0 0 co 0 <!) 0 0 0 0
~ CD 0:: CD CD CD CD CD CD 0:: ~ CD CD CD 0:: CD CD CD
c c c
co 0 ... co ... ... Q) c Q) 0 c co Q) .2 ... c
.g? .g? .g? .~ en en .g?
c ... ... "0 Q) "0 C ~ ... .:; "0 .:; Q)
::J C "0 0 C 0 it) > Q) (5 "0 :~ it) c "0 0 Q)
0 co co co 0 0 I'- co ... co I'- 0 co co 0 co co ...
c..> en 0:: c..> Cf) c..> c..> <!) ....!. 0 <!) <!) 0:: -.J I -l Cf) 0 <!) 0:: 0 c..> <!)
"0 "E "0 "E
... ...
co co co iU > co iU
> > > >
"0 .,g? Q) .,g? co Q)
.... ~ ~ ~
co ::J :::l :::l :::l
> 0 0 0 ..:!l:: 0 ..:!l::
.,g? CD CD CD "0 .... "0 "0 .... CD "0 .... "0 "0
"0 .... co co co co "0 "0 .... co .... co
:::l 0::: co ~ co co 0- 0 0 0- co t\l co co 0- co 0
0 ... .... > Q) 0:: 0::: 0 0 .... > > 0:::
CD C t\l co t\l Q) Q) "0 0:: 0::: co Q) Q) Q)
.... .0 "0 .0 .0 ... ... co .0 ... "0
"0 co ... co .... .... :::l co ~ ~ co 0 c c .... :::l co t\l :::l ~
0 CD t\l 0 co co 0 <!) <!) 0:: 0 0 co 0 CD 0 0
0 I~ CD 0::: CD CD CD :2 "0 ... ~ CD CD 0::: CD "0
C 0::: c c 0:::
~ t\l .2 co t\l C Q) 0::: Q) t ~ co c Q) .2 c
Q) ... ... ... Q) "0 Q) Q) "0 8 c c ... Q) "0 ~ Q)
..:!l:: :::l C "0 it) C C Q) it) it) c Q) "0
co 0 co co I'- co co .... 0 I'- C C 0 .... .:; I'- .:; co ... 0 t\l 0 C
-l c..> en 0::: I en Cf) <!) CD ....!.. a:: 0- CD ~ ::i ....!. ::i en CD CD 0::: -.J a::
"E "0 "E
....
~ iU co t\l co
> > >
Q) .,g? Q)
~ ~ :::l ::J :::l
..:!l:: 0 0 0
.... ... "E "0 "0 "0 "0 CD CD CD "0
"0 "E "0 "0 co co ... .... .... .... "0 "0 ...
.... .... ... 0- 0- co co co co co co co co
<<l co co co > > > > > 0 0 "0 "0 "0 co co ~ "0 >
> > > > 0:: c::: c::: ... ... c:::
Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0::: c::: co co co ~
.,g? Q) .,g? .,g? ... ...
co co :::l :::l :::l :::l :::l 8 8 8 .0 .0 .0 ~ :::l
:::l ::J :::l :::l <!) <!) 0 0 0 0 0 c c ... ... ... 0
0 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 :2 :2 "0 "0 "0 co co co "0 CD
CD CD CD CD c c ~ ~ a:: c::: 0::: CD CD CD a::
Q) Q) c .... .~ .... c 0::: c::: 0 .2 co co co ....
en en en en .g? .g? .!!:!
.:; .:; .:; .:; "0 "0 Q) ~ c c Q) Q) Q) :c - ... ... Q)
Q) "0 C C C
t\l co t\l co (5 (5 ... (5 0 0 0 .:; .:; .E: .E: .E: co co co co co c (5
0 0 0 0 <!) <!) <!) c..> c..> c..> -.J ::J ::i 0- 0- 0- c::: 0::: en Cf) Cf) 0- c..>
0 0 ..... N 0 0 0 ..... N 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~.
~ it) co co ~ N I'- N N C") 0) ~ it) ....... I'- ex> 0 ~ co I'- ex> it) .....
~ ~ ~ ~ N N N C") C") C") ~ it) it) co co co I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- N C")
~
i:1..
-
c
Q)
E
~
o
t\l
:::::
<{
0:::
::>
<{
Q)
~
...
c
c
~
o
..c
~(/)
<0 (/)
~c
~ Q)
0) E
C)
Q)
en
>-
o
c
Q)
....
" ....
... :::l
ca 0
" c
c 8
~~
...
co<O(/)E
~~OO
"I I'- ...J ....
~~O')::
- c c
~ ~
CD Q)
..CD:t:
~::!::c
>(t)(/)
CD '-
U)~= ~
.!!-::!:co
01:: II CD "0
..::; V C c
CD (t) ca :::l
c,!!...J.8
~i1:<{
CDCD::a:
scec..>
OcaCDI-
.... ...J a.. .
-
C'G
~
....,
c
CD
o
...,
tn
C'G
W
-
I:
Q)
E
Q)
OJ
as
I:
as
:E
~
o
I:
Q)
...
...
::s
o
I:
~o
_0
::)1:
<C~
c:nas
01::
00
N~
I:
~l!
01-
c.~
CD c:
0:: 5
<C~
:E .!
o 0
1-0
E
Q)
-
rn
~
C/)
<C
:E
o
I-
.....
tn
CD
~
.J:
~
o
z
0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 ex:> 'V 0 co co 'V 'V ex:> It) It) 0 co 0 co N 0 0 N 'V 0 0 0 ex:> 0 co 0 'V 0
ex:> 'V ex:> co co ('I) 'V T"" T"" 'V ,.... co ('I) ex:> N ('I) N ('I) 'V LO 0) 0) 0) ,.... 0) ('I) 'V .'V co
T"" T"" T"" T""
'V co co co co N co N N co co co co co co co 'V co co co co co co co co N 'V 'V co
0 T"" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 ex:> 'V 0 T"" ex:> 'V ,.... 0) ,.... N 0 ~ 0 T"" N It) LO ,.... 0) It) LO LO ('I) It) ex:> 0 T"" 0
N 0 T"" T"" T"" T"" N 0 0 0 T"" T"" 0 ('I) N N 0 0 0 0 T"" T"" T"" ..- ..- T"" T"" T"" T""
It) co ex:> T"" T"" ('I) ,.... ,.... ,.... 0 ('I) N 0 It) T"" ..- LO 'V 0) 0) ('I) ('I) ,.... 0 N co ('I) 10 co
co LO It) LO co ,.... LO ('I) ~ co ,.... 0) C") ('I) ~ 'V LO ex:> ex:> ,.... ,.... 0) ex:> ,.... ,.... ,.... 0) 0 ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T"" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T"" 0
"0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0
Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl
a ...: a Ctl a Ctl a Ctl
c::: 0 c::: a c::: a "0 c::: a
c::: c::: Ctl c:::
.!: E "0 .!: "0 ..:ll::: "0 .!: "0 ..:ll::: a "0 .!: "0 ..:ll:::
0 Ctl "0 0 Ctl a> "0 Ctl 0 Ctl c::: Ctl 0 Ctl "0
Ctl a a Ctl Ctl a > c Ctl a Ctl a c a Ctl a> a c Ctl
a> If) c::: a a> c::: 'C Ctl a c::: Q) a::: Ctl - (J) a::: Q) > a::: Ctl a
CD (J) c::: CD 0 L- "0 c::: CO L- a> "0 (J) CD .C L- "0 c:::
a ~ LL Ctl LL ~ Ctl Ctl 0 LL Ctl
~ I a> a> I Q) 8- I
~ CD c == ~ a> a c ~ ~ ~ a> CiS a a.. a> ~ ..:ll::: a> a c
:c "0 a .0 "0 :c .... a::: a .0 .... c::: :c L- :!2 ~ a::: a
.... Ctl .... (J) Ctl
L- ~ 0:: .... L- L- ~ ~ L- ~ ~ L- Ctl Q) ....
a> ~ a> c::: a> t ..:ll::: Q) a::: t c ~ a> a::: 1:: ~
..- "0 a ..- :~ a a.. ..-
"0 C "0 "0 'V 8- "0 'V "0 8- "0 'V "0 a
c Ctl a> c It) c a> c a c It) E c Q) a L: E c ::!:: a> a a. c
Ctl L- C .S; ,.... Ctl .!: Ctl CJ) a L- .s; ,.... E Ctl c CJ) a .!: L- ~ E as ::J c (/) a L- 's;
> 0 a.. ::J I > a.. > ::::> C.9 ~ ::J I > c: ::::> C.9 CJ) <( > C.9 a.. ::::> C.9 ~ ::J
"0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0
Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl "0
a ...: a Ctl a as a as
c::: 0 c::: a a::: a "0 a::: a
c::: c::: Ctl c:::
"0 .!: E "0 .!: ..:ll::: "0 .!: ~ a> a "0 .!:
Ctl 0 "0 Ctl 0 Q) a> "0 as 0 a::: as 0 Q) ~
a Ctl a as a as > > c Ctl .... a Ctl c c a as Q) > c
a::: a> (J) a c::: Q) 'C 'C Ctl a a> c::: Q) "0 Ctl .... ..J (J) a::: a> > .C as
co (J) "0 0::: CD 0 L- a::: a> CD Ctl L- a> (J) CD .C L- "0
a> a as 0 LL L- a LL a> ~ Ctl 0 0 u.. Ctl
a> I .... Q) I L- a> I
a> ~ co a c a> ~ Q) == Q) "0 C (/) a> ~ a::: Q) - a.. a> ~ ..:ll::: ~ Q) a
as .0 a::: a ..c L- .0 ~ c:: a :c .... CJ) c::
Ctl a as .... ::J (J) Ctl .0 L- ~
L- ~ - L- L- a> .... Ctl L- C ~ ~ a L- Ctl a ~
..:ll::: Q) t ~ ..:ll::: a> .!: a> T"" t ~ .C ..:ll::: a> a T"" () C ..:ll::: a> a.. .!: t
a "0 8- a "0 J!! "0 "0 ~ a "0 ~ "0 :~ a ..- "0
C 'V ~ 'V "0 J!! 'V e
E c ~ c E c c a c E c a ,= Q) E c ::!:: a
.S; .S; Ctl
E Ctl L- E Ctl ::J Ctl CJ) a L- E E ~ L- CJ) a .!: Q) ~ E as ::J ::J CJ) a
> 0 <( ::J > C.9 > ::::> C.9 ~ ::i () ::::> C.9 (/) ..J > C.9 C.9 ::::> C.9 <(
~ ~ "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0
Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl
Ctl Ctl a a a a
~ ~ a a .!: .!: .!: .!: .!: a::: a::: 0::: a:::
..:ll::: ..:ll::: c::: a::: t t 1:: t t
L- L- "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 a a a a a ..c ..c ..c ..c
Ctl Ctl ..:ll::: ..:ll::: Z Z Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl "0 "0 "0 Ctl Ctl Ctl Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0
a.. a.. c c a a a a Ctl Ctl as a> a a a Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl
Ctl as a> Q)
"0 "0 "0 a> Q) L- .... ::J ::J c::: c::: c:: a::: a a a > c::: c::: c::: Ctl 'as Ctl as .as Q) a> a> a>
Ctl Ctl Ctl .... .... LL LL c c Q) c::: a::: a::: "C .... L- .... .... L- a) CD a) a)
a a a Ctl Ctl I I Q) a> a> a> a> c c c 0 ~ ~ ~ r- r- r- r- r- ~ ~ == ~
C.9 C.9 Q) Q) ~ a> ~ a>
c:: c::: a::: ~ ~ > ~ a a a a> .0 :c ..c :a
<( Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl .... ~ .... :E :E "0 E E E E E
t 1:: t c c a> Q) ..:ll::: ~ ~ ..:ll::: ~ ~ .... a::: c::: i:2 L- L- L- L-
Q) Q) ~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ Q) Q) a> a>
e e e "0 "0 ..c .!: a a a a "0 "0 "0 "0
"0 "0 a a .... .... E E E E c c c Q) a> Q) E E E E E
a a a a ..- ..- .S; 'S; 'S; Ctl C C C C C C C
~ <( <( C.9 C.9 C.9 C.9 ..- ..- E E E E ::i ::J ::J a> Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl ~ Ctl Ctl
..- ..- CJ) a.. a.. a.. r- r- r- r- r- > > >
..- N 0 0 0 0 ..- N T"" .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..- N ..-
0 ..- N N
0 0 ('I) 'V (J) 0 ..- ..- N ..- N ('I) ('I) 'V It) co co (J) 0 ..- N (J) 0 0 ..-
..- N N N N N N ('I) 'V 'V 'V 'V N It) It) It) co co co co 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 ..- ..- ..-
'V T"" ..- ..- ..- ..- T"" ..-
~o
:::>>
<(:...,
g~
o
N
1::1-
o
a...,
CD
0::
<(0
:E
0-
1-0
0 0 0 0
0 ""'" ex:> 0
N L() N N
T""
CO N N N
0 0 0 0
0 /'0. ""'" 0
N N T"" T""
ex:> L() ('I) 0')
~ L() ~ ""'"
0 0 0 0
"'C
rn
"'C 0
E .... 0:::
rn
CD > U) Q)
.., Q) U) ::J
~ ::J rn c
0 a.. Q)
>
rn CO U) <(
c
.., c .0 ..c T""
s::: ~ .... ""'"
CD .9 T"" en
0 ~ T""
E ....J T"" ::>
a
('G
s:::
('G
:E "'C
rn
~ "'C 0
"'C 0::: 0::: Q)
rn >
s::: 0 ..c U) .C
e 0::: () U) 0
rn rn
... c Q) a.. ~
::::J 0 co U) .0
U .... ....
~ rn c Q)
s::: ~ .0 "'C
0 C c .9 c
:~ 0 ~ rn
....J co >
s:::
0
-
('G "'C
rn
8- 0 "'C
0::: rn
tn ..c 0
() Q) Q) 0:::
s::: rn > >
('G Q) .C .C C/)
... co 0 0 U)
rn
>: =: ~ ~ a..
.0 .0 .0 U)
.... .... ....
s::: (1) Q) (1) c
::::J "'C "'C "'C :~
0 c c c
~ rn ~ ~
>
...
CD N 0 0 0
-
..-- ""'" L() /'0.
0 ...... T"" ...... ......
...... T"" T"" T""
1:J
...
ca
1:J
c::
S
U)
cocoU)
000
cri......J
........-
N N c'
+::
CD
CD
~:2
> (I)
c'!!
=~:i
11II: II CD
tG V c::
CD (I) ca
c::,!!...J
j:!c
CD CD
S c: f
o ca CD
~...JD..
~
o
an
M
cD
en
Q)
E
:l
"'5
>
Q)
o
.~
Q)
III
Q)
C
(U
...
"<t
"C
Q)
C
.~
in
c
o
o
>.
.g
(5
c..
>.
;:i
c
Q)
....
....
:l
o
Q)
:5
c
o
"C
Q)
III
(U
.0
.~
Q)
::0
~
III
E
-
c
()
:>
..
c
CD
E
.s::;
o
~
<(
E
CD
~
rn
>.,
U)
~
c
CD
E
CD
C)
ca
c
cu
:IE
>.,
u
c
CD
...
...
~
u
c
D:: 0
_0
;:)c
c(~
CO ca
01::=
o 0
N~
c
t:= ~
0.....
Q.~
CD c
D:: 5
<(C:
:E~
o 0
1-0
L.
.- 0
c-
.~-
o.CI
.Il:
:i:o
~>
0.
E
o
...
II.;
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ex:> co ex:> N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co ex:> 10 C"') co ~ 0 ~ ....... 0 ....... ~ co v 0 0 co co 0 ex:> ~ co co
"- N C"') ....... co ex:> v C"') V 10 C"') 0 10 ex:> co co co " co co ex:> co "
....... .......
v ...,. N N co V N V ...,. V V V co co co co co v v v co co v
0 0 10 10 0 0 0 " v " ex:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0) " " co ....... ....... 0 ex:> 0 N " co co ~ 0 0 ....... 0) 10 " ~ ....... 0)
....... 0 ....... 0 ....... N N 0 ....... ....... 0 N N ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .......
" " co It) " v 0 ex:> ex:> " It) co ....... ....... co 0 co co N 0 co ....... v
" " ~ 0 ~ 0) ex:> " 0) 0) ~ " LO 10 0) 't'" " co 10 ex:> 10 ...,. co
0 0 't'" 't'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 't'" 0 0 0 0 't'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"'0 "'0 "'0
... ... ....
ea ea ~ ~ ea ~
> > >
Q) Q) Q)
"'0 :J :J 3: 3: :J 3:
0 0 .::t:. .::t:. 0 .::c.
ea m "E m "E "'0 "'0 .... "'0 ... "'0 m .... "'0
0 ... .... ea "'0 .... eu "'0 ... "'0 eu "E ....
0::: ea ea eu eu a. ... eu a. ea eu ... a. eu
eu eu eu eu ea eu
.... > .... > > > > > 0 > .... > > >
c ea Q) ea Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) Q) 0::: Q) ea Q) Q)
.... ..0 "'0 ..0 ... ~ ... "'0 ..0 Q) ... "'0 ~
ea ... eu :J .... :J :J :J eu :J :J eu ea c :J .... :J ea eu :J :J
m ea 0 0 ea 0 0 0 (9 0 0 (9 0 0 0 ea 0 (9 0 0 0
~ m 0:: m m m III m m m 0:: ... m m m 0:: m m
c c ~ c
ea ,Q ... .... ... c Q) c Q) ,Q c Q) .Q ...
.~ ea .~ .~ .~ eu f/) f/) .~
c ... ... Q) "'0 Q) :2 c: ~ ... 'S; "'0 .S;
:J C "'0 - C - - Q) 10 > Q) "'0 :~ 10 c "0 "'0
0 eu eu 0 eu 0 0 ... 0 " ea ... 0 ea " 0 eu ea eu eu 0
() en 0:: () en () () (9 (9 I 0 (9 (9 0:: ...J I ...J en 0 (9 0:: 0 ()
"E "'0 "'0 "E
... ...
ea ea ea ~ ~ ea ~
> > > >
"E Q) ~ Q) Q)
ro :J :J :J 3: 3: :J ~
> 0 0 0 .::t:. -:C 0
Q) m m m "'0 "'0 ... "'0 "'0 co "'0 ... "'0
"'0 ea ... eu ea eu ea "'0 "'0 ... ea ....
:J 0:: eu ea ~ 0 ea a. 0 0 a. eu ea ea ea a. eu
0 ... .... 0:: > 0:: 0:: 0 0 .... > >
m c ro ea ea Q) Q) Q) "'0 0:: 0:: ea ~ Q) Q)
... ..0 "'0 ..0 ..0 ... ... eu ... "'0
ea ea ~ :J ea ~ 8 ro ..0 :J ea ea :J
"'0 .... ... ... 0 c c ...
0 m ea 0 ea ea 0 (9 C> 0:: 0 0 ea 0 C> 0 0
0 ~ m 0:: m m :Q CD "'0 "'0 ... ~ m m 0:: m
3: 0:: c: 0:: ir c t ~ c
eu ,Q ea ea c Q) Q) ea c: Q) .Q c
Q) c ... ... ... Q) Q) "'0 Q) Q) "'0 g C C ... Q) "'0 ~
.::c. :J c "'0 10 C C Q) 10 10 c: Q) "'0
eu 0 ea eu " eu ea .E:; ... 0 " c c 0 ... > " .S; ea .... 0 eu 0
...J () en 0:: ..!. en en a. C> (9 I a. D. C> <( :.:J I :.:J en (9 C> 0:: ...J
"'0 "'0 "E
... ...
~ ~ ro ea eu
> > >
~ ~ ~
3: ~ :J :J :J
.::t:. 0 0 0
.... .... "E "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "E
"'0 "E "'0 "E ea ea .... .... ... ... "'0 "'0 m m m
... ... a. a. ea ro ea ro ro ea eu ea
eu ea ea ea > > > > > > 0 0 "'0 "'0 "'0 ea ea ea "'0
> > > > 0:: 0:: 0::: ... ... .... 0:::
Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q)
Q) Q) Q) Q) ... ... 0:: 0::: ea ea ea
ea ea :J :J :J :J :J :J ~ B B ..0 ..0 ..0 ~
:J :J :J :J (9 (9 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c .... ... ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 "'0 "'0 eu eu ea
III lD lD m III m co m m co ... ... :E :E "'0 0::: 0::: lD III III "'0
C c ii: ii:
Q) Q) c: .... .... .... .... c: ~ ~ 0:: c::: ,Q
f/) en f/) f/) ,~ .~ .~ .~ .Q ro ea eu
.S; .S; 'S; 'S; "'0 "'0 Q) ~ c c: Q) Q) Q) ... ... ... Q)
Q) "'0 "'0 c: C c:
ro ea ea eu "0 "0 .... 0 0 (5 0 0 'S; 'S; c c: c: ea ea eu ro ea c
0 0 0 0 (9 (9 (9 () () () () ...J :.:J :.:J a. a: a: 0:: 0::: en en en a:
0 0 ....... N 0 0 0 -It ....... N 0 0 0 0 ....... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V 10 co co ....... N " ....... N N C"') 0) ...,. 10 " " ex:> 0 ....... co " ex:> 10
....... ....... ....... ....... N N N C"') C"') C"') C"') V 10 10 co co co " " " " " N
.......
ii..
...
c
Q)
E
~
()
eu
::::
<(
0:::
:::>
<(
Q)
~
~...
" c
~ c
o 3:
0) 0
~
f/)
f/)
...
c
Q)
E
-cO)
... Q)
C'IS f/)
-c>-
c: ()
C'IS C
- ~
fJ) ...
fJ) :J
o g
...I 0
()
g>Q)
:,;:l:5
CD E
CD 0
O:E...
- '+-
>fIJ...
o..!c
fIJ't"'_~
_CD -= Q)
II CD ~
i v c: "'0
CD fIJ C'IS f/)
c: .! ...I .-
~i'E~
CD CD "0
s c: ~ c
o C'IS CD :J
1-...10.0
..0
<(
::2:
()
I-
"I:tN
O't'"
CON
"I:tM
't'" .......
-It
<(
:E
o
l-
ns
...
....
C
CD
o
.....
fn
ns
W
E
CD
...
tn
~
en
...
c
CD
E
CD
C)
ns
c
ns
:E
~
(J
c
CD
....
....
~
(J
c
a:: 0
_0
::) c:
c(~
CO ns
o~
o 0
N~
c
~ ~
01-
a.~
CD c
0::: S
c(~
:E .!
0-
.....8
&..
."/-0
0-
~-
Q. CI
.0::
... .
J:O
.~>
Q.
c(
:E
o
.....
......
tn
CD
~
.c
~
o
z
0 <0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 co ~ 0 <0 <0 ~ ~ co LO LO 0 <0 0 <0 N 0 0 N ...,. 0 0 0 co 0 co 0 ...,. 0
co ...,. co <0 <0 C") ...,. ...... ...... ...,. ,..... <0 C") co N C") N C") ...,. LO ()) ()) ()) ,..... ()) C") ...,. ...,. co
...... ...... ...... ......
...,. <0 <0 co <0 N co N N <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co ...,. co <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co N ...,. ...,. co
0 ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 co ~ 0 ...... co ...,. ,..... ()) ,..... N 0 co 0 ...... ~ LO LO ,..... ()) LO LO LO C") LO co 0 ...... 0
N 0 ...... ...... ...... ...... N 0 0 0 ...... ...... 0 C") N N 0 0 0 0 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
<0 C") ...... ...,. ...,. ...... N ...... ...,. ...... ...,. C") ()) co ...... ...,. co ()) co ()) N ,..... ...,. co ()) LO C") 10 0
co LO LO C") C") co <0 C") ...,. co co ()) co C") ~ LO ~ ,..... co ,..... co ()) ()) ,..... <0 co ()) 'l:"'" LO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'l:"'" 0
"'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0
tV tV tV tV
0 ...: 0 tV 0 tV 0 tV
0::: 0 0::: 0 0::: 0 "'0 0::: 0
0::: 0::: tV 0:::
~ E "'0 ~ "'0 ..:ll:: "'0 ~ "'0 ..:ll:: 0 "'0 ~ "'0 ..:ll::
0 tV "'0 0 tV V "'0 tV 0 tV 0::: tV 0 tV "'0
tV 0 0 tV tV 0 > C tV 0 tV 0 C a tV v 0 C tV
V U) 0::: a v 0::: "C tV 0 0::: v 0::: ~ - U) 0::: v > 0::: ~ a
m U) 0::: m 0 .... "'0 0::: m Q) "'0 U) m .C "'0 0:::
.Q u. tV U. Q) tV tV 0 U. tV
~ ~ I Q) ~ I .... Q) ~ I
== m c ~ == Q) 0 c ~ == Q) CiS a a.. Q) == ..:ll:: V 0 c
:.0 "'0 0 .c "'0 :.0 ~ a:: a tV :.0 "'0 ~ a:: U) tti .c .... "'0 ~ 0::: a
.... ~ 0:: ~ .... 0:: .... Q) - .... 0:: Q) ~ L.... tV 0:: Q) -
Q) Q) Q) ...... t ~ ..:ll:: <1> ...... t c ..:ll:: Q) a.. ...... t ~
"'0 C "'0 "'0 ...,. "'0 e 0 "'0 ...,. "'0 8. :~ a "'0 ...,. "'0 0
C Q) C LO C Q) C 0 c E c Q) 0 -.:: E c ~ Q) a Q. c
tV C "::; C :~ LO c C "::;
tV L.... ,..... tV ~ en 0 ,..... E tV en a ~ .... ~ E tV ::J en 0 ....
> 0 a: :.:J ....!.. > a.. ::l C) <( ....J I > a.. ::> C) en <( > C) a.. ::l C) <( :.:J
"'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0
tV tV tV tV "'0
0 a tV 0 tV a tV
a:: L.... a:: 0 a:: a "'0 a:: 0
0 a:: a:: tV a::
"'0 ~ E "'0 ~ ..:ll:: "'0 ~ ..:ll:: Q) a "'0 ~
tV 0 "'0 tV 0 <1> Q) "'0 tV 0 a:: tV 0 Q) ..:ll::
0 tV a tV a tV > > C tV - a tV c C 0 tV Q) > c
0::: Q) U) 0 0::: Q) "C .C tV a <1> 0::: Q) "'0 tV - ....J U) a:: Q) > .C tV
m U) "'0 0::: m 0 .... 0::: ~ m tV .... V U) m .C .... "'0
.Q tV <1> 0 U. 0 U. ~ I~ tV 0 0 U. tV
a> I - Q) I Q) I
~ == m a c a> == ~ == V "'0 C en Q) == 0::: Q) CiS a.. Q) ~ a> Q) a
..:ll::
.c 0::: 0 tV .c .c - a:: 0 .c - ::J .c L.... .... ~ 0:::
tV 0 - tV - U) tV
.... ~ ~ .... .... ~ - tV L.... C Q) ~ 0 L.... tV a ~
..:ll:: Q) t ..:ll:: Q) ~ Q) t ~ .C ..:ll:: V !~ c ..:ll:: Q) a.. ~ t
a a ...... a ...... () :~ 0 ......
"'0 C 8 "'0 ~ "'0 ...,. "'0 g 8 "'0 ...,. "'0 "'0 ~ ...,. "'0 ~
E c tV C E c c 0 c E c 0 .: a> E c ~ 0
tV .... .... "::; E ~ ::J tV en a .... .::; tV tV en a ~ tV ::J ::J en 0 L....
E <( E E .... a> ~ E
> 0 :.:J C) > ::l C) <( :.:J > () ::l C) en ....J > C) '" ::l '" <(
~ ~ "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0
tV tV tV tV
tV tV a a a a
3: 3: a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0::: 0::: 0::: a::
..:ll:: ..:ll:: 0::: 0::: .. t t t t t
.... L.... "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 0 a a 0 a ~ ~ ~ ~
tV tV ..:ll:: ..:ll:: Z Z tV tV tV tV "'0 "'0 "'0 tV tV tV Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0
a.. a.. c c a a a a tV tV tV 0 0 a tV tV tV tV
~ tV Q) Q) Q)
"'0 "'0 "'0 a> Q) L.... ::J ::J 0::: a:: a:: 0::: 0 a a > 0::: 0::: 0::: tV tV tV tV ~ Q) a> Q) Q)
tV tV tV - - u. u. c c Q) Q) Q) v 0::: 0::: 0::: .C L.... .... .... .... m m m m
a 0 0 tV tV I I a> Q) c c c 0 ~ ~ l} l- I- l- I- I- == == == ~
C) '" v Q) Q) Q) a> Q)
0::: 0::: 0::: ~ ~ > > tti tti tti 0 a a V "'0 32 "'0 .c .c :.0 .c
c c Q) a> <( <( tV ~ ~ ~ - 0:: 0:: E E E E E L.... .... L.... ....
t t t a> v ..:ll:: ..:ll:: ..:ll:: ..:ll:: ~ 0::: .~ tV "~ .~ "~ Q) Q) a> a>
g g 8- "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 ~ ~ a 0 a 0 .E "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0
a a - - E E E E c c c Q) Q) a> E E E E
"0 ...... ...... tV C C C C
L.... L.... L.... a a a ...... E E E E .::; "::; "::; Q) .s c C tV ~ tV tV tV tV tV tV tV
<( <( <( C) C) C) '" ...... :.:J :.:J :.:J
...... ...... en a.. a.. a.. l- I- l- I- > > > >
...... N 0 0 0 0 ...... N ...... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...... N ......
0 ...... N
0 0 C") ...,. ()) 0 ...... ...... N N ...... N ("t) ("t) ...,. It) co co ()) 0 ...... N ()) 0 0 ......
...... N N N N N N ("t) ...,. ...,. ...,. ...,. ...,. It) It) LO <0 co co <0 ()) ()) 0 0 0 0 ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
1:=
o
c.
CD
D:::
<C
:!
o
I-
D:::
-
::)
<(
co
C)
C)
N
0 0 0 0
0 ~ CO 0
N LO N N
~
CO N N N
0 0 0 0
0 " 'V 0
N N ~ ~
0 CO N (J)
LO LO 'V 'V
0 0 0 0
"'0
Cl]
"E 0
E Cl] 0::
CD > en Q)
... Q) en ::l
~ ::l Cl] C
0 a.. Q)
>
U) CO en <(
c
... c .g .c ~
C ~ .... 'V
CD .~ ~ (f)
E 0 ~ ~
....J ..- ::>
CD
~
C
ca
:E "'0
Cl]
~ "'0 0
"'0 0:: 0:: Q)
Cl] >
c 0 .c en ';::
CD 0:: 0 en 0
... Cl] Cl]
... c Q) a.. ~
= 0 CO en ..0
0 .... ....
~ Cl] c Q)
C ::: :~ "'0
0 C C C
0 .S: 0 ~ Cl]
::J CO >
C
0
;;
ca "'0
~ Cl]
0
& 0:: "'0
Cl]
.c 0
(I) 0 Q) Q) 0::
C Cl] > >
ca Q) .;:: .;:: en
... CO Q Q en
I- Cl]
~ ~ ::: a..
~ ..0 ..0 :.c en
... ... ...
Q) Q) Q) c
= "U "'0 "'0 :~
0 c c: c:
Cl] Cl] Cl] ~
0 > > >
...
.!!! N 0 0 0
- ..- 'V LO "
0 ..- ..- ..- ..-
0 ..- ~ ~ ..-
Q)
E
::::I
(5
>
Q)
0
.~
Q)
I/)
Q)
c:
ra
.-
~
ra
.9
"0
Q)
c:
'(ij
I.-
....
I/)
c:
0
0
>-
g
(5
a.
>-
~
c:
Q)
l.-
I.-
::::I
0
.~
"E
Q)
E
Ol
~ Q)
0 I/)
CC) .~
"it
en ..c:
en ....
aj
E
::::I
(5
>
Q)
0
"C .~
Q)
.. I/)
cu Q)
"C c:
c: ra
S ..
CO
C/) "0
C/) Q)
CD .... 0 Q)
(;) en Ci
en ....: ....J E
.... .... C) 0
N N 0
c: Q)
;; ..c:
CD ....
CD c:
0 :IE 0
- "0
> CI) Q)
..9! I/)
~ ra
CI) ..0
..9! or- :IE .~
:E II CD Q)
V c: :c
CD CI) as J!!
c: ..9! ...I I/)
CU :IE - :c
..J C ....
CD CD .S
J! u u
c: ..
0 as CD :>
I- ...I c.. <<
....
-0
c-
...-:-
Q.CG
.~
XU
~>
Q.
~
-
:7)
<t:
~
o
o
N
.
1::
(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
C! N ~ (0 ""'= ~ CO 0 (0 0 (0 N 0 0 N ~ 0 0 0 co. 0 (0 <r;;t, cO '<:t CO 0
CO t") N t") ~ ..... ..... N Q) CO N ('I') N t") ~ lO oi Q) Q) '" oi cv; CO lO N N
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
~ (0 (0 N (0 N N (0 c.o (0 c.o c.o ~ c.o c.o (0 (0 c.o (0 c.o (0 N V (0 N N N
0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 N ..... CO ""'= ,.... Q) 0 (0 0 .... N lO lO "": Q) lO I.Q LO t") lO ~ .... C! ,.... 'V> 0
N N N ..... N 0 0 N ..... t") N N 0 0 0 0 .... ...... ........ .... .... ..... N t") N ..... ....
'" ~ lO ..... N N ~ ..... (0 CO ...... lO CO 0 Q) 0') ,.... C'") ~ CO Q) (0 CO 0 Q) .... lO
~ l.Q t") ~ c.o ('I') <r;;t, CO Q) t") 'V> LO 'V> CO CO ,.... ,.... 0) Q) ,.... (0 CO ~ LO <r;;t, ~ 'V>
0 0 ci 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
""0 ""0 ""0 ""0 "0
(1J (1J CO CO
0 0 0 (1J 0
0:::: 0:::: 0:::: 0 ""0 0:::: "'C
0:::: (1J (tl
.s::. ""0 .s::. ""0 "'C .s::. "0 ..::t:. 0 "0 .s::. "'C "E 0
0 (1J 0 ttl Q) CO 0 CO 0:::: (tl 0 (tl 0::::
(tl 0 CO 0 > 0 CO 0 C 0 CO Q) 0 CO
Q) 0:::: Q) 0:::: .c 0:::: Q) 0:::: t'\'J .... U) 0:::: Q) > 0::: > U) Q)
CD CO 0 "0 CO ... Q) "0 en CD 'c "0 ~ U) ::J
~ 8 t'\'J Q) ~ u.. e (tl (tl Q) 0 ~ CO ::I CO C
.- .- I
::: ::: 0 (I) Q) .... 0 a.. Q) ~ ..::t:. 0 0 a.. Q)
:0 "0 :e "0 :0 0:::: co :c "0 - (/') cr U) :0 ... ""0 0::: CD >
"- 0:: 0:: .... .... ~ '(j) ~ ttl "- CO a: U) <(
Q) Q) Q) ..... 1:: .lI::: Q) .... 1:: c ..::t:. Q) a. ..... t:: c: C
""0 '0 "0 0 0 -0 ""0 S 1:8 0 "0 .~ .s::. ....
c Q) lO C Q) c: .~ .~ LO E c: Q) ~ 0 "t: E c: l:::: Q) ~ 8- ~ ..... v
c c c c ......
ttl ,.... ~ ~ en ,.... E ttl en 0 .s::. '- E (tl ::I en .... en
> 0::: ...!.. 0::: ::l <( ...!.. > 0::: ::J (!) CI) < ~. > (!) a.:: ::l <i 0 ~ .....
- ...J ..... ::J
""0 ""0 '0 "0 ""0
ttl ttl ttl ttl
0 0 0 ttl 0
0:::: 0::: 0:::: 0 -0 0:::: "0
0:::: ttl (tl
-0 .s::. ""0 .s::. "0 .s::. ..::t:. Q) 0 "0 .s::. "'C 0
(tl 0 ttl 0 Q) Q) ttl 0 0:::: ttl 0 Q) 0::: 0:::: Q)
0 CO 0 ttl > > .... 0 CO c: c 0 ttl Q) > >
0::: Q) 0:::: Q) .c -I:: Q) 0:::: Q) -0 ~ 15 ::i en 0:::: Q) > .c .s::. en .c
CD "0 CD 0 0 e CD (tl u.. ~ en CD ~t: 0 "0 0 en 0
Q) ttl Q) ..... Q) 0 ~ CO Q) 0 CO (tl
~ =:: ~ I (tl
Q) 0 (I) Q) "0 en Q) =:: 0:::: Q) en r:: a. (1) =:: Q) 0 (1) a.. ..=!
co :c 0::: ttl :c .... :c 0::: co co :0 ..... ::I co :0 i:: '- 0::: CD :0
... .... 0 .... "- r:: 15 ~ 0 U) '- ('\:l 0 en "-
..::t:. Q) t:: .lI::: Q) .s::. Q) t:: ..::t:. Q) ~ c: ..::t:. C
0 0 ...... .c ..... t) Q) a. .s::. ...... 1:: co Q)
-0 2 "0 ~ "0 V ~ ~ 0 -0 V -0 :~ 0 "0 en ~ 2 = :~ "0
E r:: E r:: r:: E 0 :s E - "'"""'
::I C ~ Q) c -s -s c c
E co .... E co co en E E ~ en 0 .s::. Q) E co en .... 0 co
> <i > (!) > ::J < t) ::> (!) en ...J ~ > 0 (!) ::J <i CD ~ >
~ "'C "0 '0 "0 "0
co co (1J (1J (tl
0 0 0
~ 0 0 .s::. .s::. .c .s::. .c 0:::: cr 0:::: -0
0:::: 0::: 1:: 1:: t:: 1:: 1:: co
.... "0 "0 ""0 -0 "0 0 0 0 0 0 .s::. .s::. .s::. 0
(1J ..::t:. ..::t:. Z Z CO CO "0 "0 "'C co (tl (1J Z Z Z Z Z to) 0 0 Q) (I) 0:::
a. c c CO co CO
CO CO Q) (I) 0 0 Q) 0 0 0 ttl co CO > >
'0 "0 Q) .... "- ::I ::J 0:::: 0:::: 0 0 0 > 0:::: 0:::: 0::: .~ .(5 .~ .(5 (1) (1) Q) 'c 'c U)
co ro - u.. u.. c c 0:::: ex: 0:::: .c ~ ... "- co CD In 0 0 U)
0 0 ('\:l Ii> , Q) Q) Q) Q) c: c c: 0 ~ ~ ~ l- I- f- l- I- CO
0 Q) (1) ~ ~ ~ .:: ~ =:: a..
ex: 0:::: ..... .... > > 0 0 0 :e :0 :0 :0 :0
.... .- <( <( co CO (1) "0 '0 '0 E E E E E
1:: t:: c: Q) ..92. ..::t:. ..::t:. ~ ~ ~ - a: a: a: "- "- "- .... en
Q) is ~ (1J (tl (1J .~ m Q) (1) Q) CD (1) 1:
e 8 '0 .s::. .s::. 0 0 .8
"'0 0 0 .... - E E c: c: c: Q) (1) Q) E E E E E '0 U "'0 ""0 "'0
.... 0 0 0 ...... ...... .> "> .> co c: 1: c: c: r:: 1: c: c:
<i <i 0 0 (!) ..... ...... E E ::J ::i (I) a.:: i:i: i:i: co CO CO CO CO ~ ~ CO co CO ~
..... ..... ::i en l- I- I- ..... ..... > > >
0 0 q 0 0 0 q q q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q q q q 0
...... N 0 c.; ~ 0') 0 ..... N ..... N M M v uj cO CO Q) 0 ..... N c) 0 ...... -..r LO ,...:
N N N t") V V V lO lO lO c.o (0 (0 (0 0') Q) 0 0 0 0 ...... ...... ..... ...... ......
...... ..... ...... .~ ..... .... ..... T"'" .....
~
"
Q
c.:
CI
CI
-
"E
"'
"tJ
C
"'
-
en
U>c,Oen
::9
--0
N N C
;;
CD
.. CD
~::E
>ttt
.. 0 .!!
(,f) .-
GJ"'"::E
= II GJ
:e v c
CD U) ftJ
CCD-I
ftJ=_
..J:Ec
-CD'"
oS c e
o ftJ CD
I--IA.
E
CD
-
~
en
-
c
CD
E
CD
en
ca
c
ca
:E
~
o
c
CD
...
...
:::s
o
c
~o
_0
::)c
.A' 0
~..
.....ca
ot:::
08-
"lei)
c
t:::f!
0....
c.~
<P c
~S
<(<:
:E~
0"0
1-0
..
-0
0-
~-
Q. ftl
Ill::
%u
~>
Do.
0 0 0 0 0 0 .q- CO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.q- ~ 0 t'! 0 CO "": CO CO
<.0 cq CO CO ~ 0 t'! ~ ~ ci "": ci <.0
~ N .q- <.0 CO ori: """ LO cri LO CO <.0 """ <.0 CO CO CO """
.,..... ..... .....
.q "<:t N <.0 .q N .q- .q- .q .q CO <.0 <.0 CO "<:t .q "<:t CO CO .q-
0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ """ CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0) """ "": ..... ..... ~ 0) "'! """ CC! CO ~ 0 ..... 0) LO """ "": ..... 0)
..... 0 N ..... N C\/ ..... ..... 0 N ci ..... N ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
CO ex;) <.0 ex;) LO ..... 0) ...... It') """ ..... ..... LO .q CO C") N ex;) C'") N
""" """ ~ ~ ~ CO 0) cq ~ l': I() ~ ~ """ CO I() ex;) LO ~ t'!
c:i 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 c:i 0 0 ci 0 0 0
"E "E "E
~ cg ~ ~ m ~
> >
(1) (1) (1)
"'0 "S "S ~ ~ "3 ~
0 0 -c ...x: 0 -c
cg m "E m "E "'0 "E .... "E m "E
0 .... m "E cg "E m "'0
0:: m m m 0- m 0- cg eo 0- .... cg
cg > ~ > > m > > cg eo >
.... > .... > >
E m (J,) cg Q) Q) Q) (1) (1) Q) "'0 Q) cg Q) CD "'0 (J,) (J,)
.0 "S .0 "S "S - "S - "S .0 .... "S
cg .... .... m "S cg cg .... "S co cg "S
CO m 0 m 0 0 C> 0 0 (!) 0 0 m 0 (!) 0 0 0
I-E m m CO CO m c m CO c a:: m CO m c 0:: m m
.... .... .... ....
eo .~ cg .~ o~ (J,) I/) c CD 0 c m en Q) 0 rn .~
- - "'0 "5 (1) "0 :0 ~ .... oS; "'0 :0 oS;
:3 c: 0 c 0 0 0 I() ~ 0 LO C 0
0 eo cg """ ('(l ('(l """ 0 ('(l eo cg co 0
t) en () en t) t) C> ~ 0 (!) (!) rr ~ -I en 0 C> a:: 0 t)
"E "E "E "E
co ro cg ~ ~ eo ~
> > > >
"E CD !!2 !!2 Q)
m "S :3 ::J ~ ~ "S ~
> 0 0 0 ...x: ...x: 0 ...x:
(I) CO CO m "'0 .... "'0 "0 .... CO "'0 .... "E
"3 "0 ro eo ro ro ro "'0 .... cg
rr eo m ('(l 0 0- 0 0 0- ro ro ro 0- m
0 .... .... .... a::: Q) a:: a::: Q) 0 .... > Q) >
CO E ro cg m "'0 0:: ro Q) Q)
.0 .0 .0 - - (0 .0 "3 10 "'0 "S
"0 ro .... L.,;; .... ~ ('(l ~ ~ ro 0 c: .... ro
0 m (0 ('(l ro (!) (!) rr 0 ('(l 0 (!) 0 0
0 ~ CO CO CO "'0 "'0 "'0 - m CO 0:: CO
~ c: ~ ~ c ~ c:
~ ro ro i!! Q) Q) 1:: ro c Q) 0 c
Q) c .... .... Q) "0 CD Q) "0 ~ - Q) "'0 :0 ~
::J C I() C C LO LO C C
...x: C (5 C c 15 oS; e 0
ro a m """ ('(l m 0::: """ 0::: 0::: 4.: ...... ('(l cg 0
-I () en ~ en en (!) ~ (!) . ::::i en (!) C> 0:: -I
"E "E "E
..~ .~ <<l ro ro
> > >
Q) Q) Q)
~ ~ :; ::J ::J
...x: ...x: 0 0 0
.... .... "E "E "E "E "E
"E "E "E ('(l ro "0 "0 CO CD CO
co ro ro 0- 0- m ltl ('(l ('(l ltl ro ('(l "'0 "0 ~ ~ ~ "0
> > > > > 0 0
> > > Q) Q) (1) Q) .!! .!! Q) a::: 0:: 0:: rr m ro ('(l .0::
Q) (1) Q) .... - :; "3 "S .0 .0 .0
"S "3 "3 ro ro ::J ::J ~ ~ ~
(!) (!) 0 0 0 0 0 c c .. .... ....
a a a .9 .9 "0 "0 m m '"
m CO CO CO CO lD CO m "0 "'0 e::: a:: co CO CO "'0
c: C .... .... .. ~ ~ n: .~ ~
en (/) (I) (1) (1) c: ~ .~ .~ c: oQ .9 ro ltl ro
.S; .S; "S; "0 "'0 Q) ~ c c Q) (1) - - - Q)
~ "0 "0 c: C c:
ltl (Q (Q "'0 "'0 0 0 (5 0 -S; OS; c: c ro m <<l <0 ro c
0 0 0 (!) (!) C> t) t) U -I ::J ::::i a: 0: a:: e::: en en en 0:::
~ 9 9 9 .9 ~ ..... "'! 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
.q- I() co ..... C\/ ...... N C\/ M 0) .q 10 """ co 0 ..... co """ co 10
..- ..... ..... C\/ N N M M C'") .q- 10 10 co co """ """ """ """ """ N
.....
<(
:E
o
I-
-
CO
...
..
C
<P
o
..
U)
ca
W
~
co
co
II')
v
en
. .
~
..
tIS
~
c:
tIS
-
en
'ltNCI)
o~O
ca. co ..J
~ ~ C)
c:
==
CD
.. CD
~:i
> CI>
.. 0 .!!
CI> ..-
CD....:e
== II CD
:e v c
CD CI> as
cCD..J
_m = ...
..J:ic:
_Q)CD
Sc:~
o tIS Q)
f-..JQ.
N N <X> e <0 e <0 N N <X> e <X> N e <0 N e N e <0
m l"'- I"'- <0 It) e It) m ..- 'V ('I') It) I"'- <0 m to N N ~ It)
'V N ...t <0 cx:i -.i I"'- ...t M M to cx:i <0 <0 I"'- ari r-..: cx:i 'V I"'-
..-
'V 'V N <0 'V N 'V 'V 'V 'V <0 <0 <0 <0 'V 'V 'V <0 'V 'V
('I') <X> m e 'V e m ('I') <X> I"'- It) ('I') N e m <X> e l"'- e m
"! ~ ('I') -r: ..- e <X> C'! I"'- <X> It) ~ -r: -r: ~ ~ ~ ~ -r: ~
..- e N ..- N N ...- ..- e c:i N ..- ...- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..-
m N <0 e <X> m N 'V e m e I"'- <X> It) <X> N m ..- It) <X>
<X> m C! <0 m ~ C! m ~ <0 It) ('I') m <0 <X> l"'- I"'- <0 I"'- 'V
e e ..- c:i c:i e ...- e ..- e e e e c:i e e c:i c:i e e
"0 "0 "0
..... ..... .....
ro ro ro
> > >- >- > >-
CIl ~ ro ro CIl ro
"0 -S :=J ~ ~ -S ::=
a a a .:.:.
ro r:o "0 r:o "E "0 ..... "0 ..... "0 r:o ..... "E
a ..... IV ro "0 ..... ro ..... "0 ro "E
a:: ro ~ ro a.. ..... ro a.. ro ..... a.. ro
ro ro ro ro ro
..... > > > > > ..... >
c ro CIl ro ~ ~ CIl > CIl CIl ~ ro > CIl > ~
..... .0 -S .0 Iii ..!!:! -S Iii "0 .0 ~ Iii "0 ..!!:!
ro ..... ..... :=J :=J :=J ro :=J ..... :=J ro :=J :=J
r:o ro a ro a a C> It) a a C> a a ro a C> a a a
r:o r:o r:o r:o r:o I"'- r:o r:o a:: r:o r:o r:o a:: r:o r:o
i?:' c c c
ro ..... ro ..... ..... CIl -!.. c CIl a c ro CIl .Q .....
c .!!! 11 11 tJl tJl tJl 11
- C "0 - ';:; CIl "0 :0 ro C .;:; :2 .;:;
:=J c (5 (5 (5 (5 a ~ (5 to OJ "0 (5
a ro ro co co I"'- a ro ro a ro co
U (f) U (f) U U C> z 0 C> C> a:: I -' (f) 0 C> a:: 0 u
"0 "0 "0 "0
..... ..... ..... .....
ro ro co ro
> > > >- >- > >-
"E ~ CIl ..!!:! ro ~ ..!!:! ro
ro "0 :=J -S :=J ::= :=J ::=
> a a a .:.:. .:.:. a .:.:.
..!!:! ro r:o r:o r:o "0 ..... "0 "0 ..... r:o "0 ..... "0
a ro ro ro ro co "0 ..... ro .....
:=J a:: ro ro co a a... a a a... ro co co a... ro
a .... ..... ..... a:: CIl a:: a:: CIl a ..... > >
r:o c ro ro co "0 a:: ro ~ CIl ..!!:!
..... .0 .0 .0 CIl Iii CIl CIl Iii ro .0 :=J Iii "0 :=J
"0 co ..... ..... ..... a c ..... ro
a r:o ro ro co OJ C> to OJ OJ C> a:: a ro a C> a a
a r:o r:o r:o "0 I"'- "0 "0 - r:o r:o a:: r:o
::= i?:' ii: c -!.. ii: ii: c 1:: II) c
c ro ro co CIl CIl a Cl ro c CIl a c
CIl C C C CIl "0 - CIl CIl "0 C C Q) "0 :0 co
.:.:. :=J to C (5 a c (5 a. It) ';:; Q) (5 Cl
co a ro I"'- ro co c ..... I"'- ro ..... ro a
-' U (f) -!.. (f) (f) il: C> z il: il: C> <( I :::i (f) C> C> a:: -'
"0 "E "0
..... .....
>- ro ro ro
>- > > >
ro ro Q) Q) ~
~ ~ "3 "3 :=J
.:.:. .:.:. a a a
..... ..... "0 "0 "E "E "0 "0 "0 "0
"0 "0 "0 co ro .... ..... ..... "0 "0 ro co r:o r:o r:o co
.... .... ..... a.. a.. ro co ro ro co ro ro
ro ro ro a a ro ~ co a
> > > > > > > > a a a:: a:: ..... ..... a::
Q) CIl CIl ..!!:! Q) CIl ~ a:: a:: co ro ro
Q) ..!!:! ~ Iii Iii -S "3 -S "0 "0
"3 :=J :=J :=J :=J CIl CIl ro ro .0 .0 .0 Q)
C> C> a a a a a c c OJ Cl ..... ..... ..... OJ
a a a a a a a co co co
r:o r:o r:o a:J r:o r:o a:J r:o iii - "0 "0 a:: a:: r:o r:o r:o "0
c C tJl ii: ii: a:
Q) Q) c ..... ..... ..... C
tJl II) II) ~ .!!! ~ Cl Cl .Q .Q !!! co co
.;:; 'S; 'S; "'0 "'0 CIl ro c c Q) Q) "E "E Q)
co ro ro (5 (5 Q) (5 (5 (5 C> ';:; .;:; c c "0 "0 c: c:
..... a ro ro ro ro co
0 0 0 C> c:> C> U U U -' :::i :::i il: il: a:: a:: (f) (f) (f) a::
'V It) <0 ..- N l"'- N ~ ('I') m 'V It) I"'- <X> e ..- <0 I"'- <X> <0
..- ..- ..- N N N ('I') N ('I') 'V It) It) <0 <0 l"'- I"'- l"'- I"'- l"'- N
('I') ..-
e
~
-
lif.l
;;...
00.
-
==
~
e
~
OJ)
d
==
d
~
D:: ;;...
CJ
==
- ~
:) -
-
cC =
CJ
==
CD 0
u cC
0 ==
0 0 :E
.-
N -
= U
-
. - t-
o
1: Q"
lif.l -
0 == as
d
a. - ~
Eo- ..
CI>> ,eo c
D:: == CI>>
= U
C 0
u
:E - ..
~ tn
U .-
- as
-
t- o w
u
"C
...
ftI
"C
r::
J!
tn
tn
o
..J
C)
r::
..
CD
CD
.. :E
~ rI)
>.!!
fI) 0 .-
.!!~:E
Ill: II CD
IIC V r::
CD fI) ftI
r::.!!..J
~:e~
CD CD
J! r:: ~
o ftI CD
~..JQ.
N CD
"': C"!
co M
N ..-
.... ....
~
o
en
~
,...
co
l"-
e
e
N
.5
C
Q)
'0
i+=
CIl
"0
CIl
E
a
o
CIl
.0
.9
"0
cjY
CIl 0
'0 CIl
~.~
00...
"Om
CIl :=J
a::r:o
Affordable Housing
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the Housing Element of the Growth Management
Plan (GMP) to determine the County's success in providing affordable housing during the
planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) - years 2004 through 2009;
current status of available affordable housing in the County; and, needed modifications to the
Housing Element.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
Chapter 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC) sets forth the minimum requirements for
local government comprehensive plans. Specifically, Section 9J-5.010, FAC, sets forth the
criteria for the establishment of housing goals, objectives and policies; housing data
requirements; and future housing needs analysis to be used by local governments for the
preparation of their required housing elements.
Pursuant to Section 163.3177 (6)(f), Florida Statutes, all local governments within the State are
required to have a Housing Element as part of their comprehensive plan. This Element must
include, "the provision for housing for all current and anticipated future residents of the
jurisdiction; elimination of substandard dwelling conditions; the structural and aesthetic
improvement of existing housing; the provision of adequate future housing, including housing
for low-income, very low-income, and moderate-income families, mobile homes, and group
home facilities and foster care facilities, with supporting infrastructure and public facilities;
provision for relocation housing and identification of historically significant and other housing
for purposes of conservation, rehabilitation, or replacement; the formulation of housing
implementation programs; and the creation or preservation of affordable housing to minimize the
need for additional local services and avoid the concentration of affordable housing units only in
specific areas of the jurisdiction."
The Collier County Housing Element is consistent with the applicable provisions of Florida
Statutes. The Element provides the County with the necessary guidance to develop appropriate
plans, programs and policies to create an adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable
housing for all County residents. The Goal, Objectives and Policies contained within the
Element demonstrate the County's commitment to meet identified and projected deficits in the
supply of housing.
Overview of Affordable Housing Activities
During the planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), the County
successfully administered various State and Federal programs including, but not limited to,
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds, HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) entitlement funds, Emergency Shelter Grant funds, State Housing
Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) funds, and funds authorized by the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act of 2008 - all of which funded numerous development and redevelopment
activities. The range of funded activities includes, but is not limited to, a single-family unit
rehabilitation program, multi-family affordable rental unit development, community park and
infrastructure development, redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes, and home buyer
education programs. In total, the County has assisted individuals and families with down
payment and closing costs in the amount of $11,571,965; funded residential rehabilitation
1
Affordable Housing Major Issue
projects in the amount of $3,108,884; and, assisted in the development of affordable-workforce
housing projects by deferring impact fees in the amount of $9,723,672.68.
The programs and funding strategies identified above (and detailed, in part, in Table 1. below),
and contained within the Housing Element, enabled public/private partnerships between
governmental agencies and the private, not-for-profit and for-profit providers of affordable
housing within the community, to reduce substandard housing, stabilize neighborhoods by
rehabilitating abandoned and foreclosed homes and residential properties, fund infrastructure
projects, and fund new affordable single-family unit and multi-family unit projects within the
County.
Table 1. Programs/Activities (June 2007- June 2009)
Strategy/Tasks
Down Payment Assistance
Results
Home Buyer Education
Outreach
loan Prequalification
loan consortium
Residential Rehabilitation
Disaster Recovery Initiative
Federal Grant Administration
Acquisiti 0 n fRehabili tati on
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
2
Affordable Housing Major Issue
Current Status of Available Affordable Housing
Notwithstanding the successes referenced in the previous section, the County has not achieved its
housing objective to create 1,000 new affordable-workforce housing units each year since the
last evaluation period ended in 2004. The County, during the planning period for this Evaluation
and Appraisal Report (EAR), has approved approximately 4,214 affordable-workforce units, but
only 728 of those units have been constructed (refer to Table 2.).
Table 2. Collier County Affordable Housing Approvals (2004 -2009)
Name
Bosley PUD
Buckley Mixed Use
Arrowhead PUD
Warm Springs
Ave Maria
Regal Acres
Palermo Cove
Santa Barbara Landings
Bristol Pines
Cirrus Pointe
Meridian Village PUD
Rockedge PUD
Liberty Landing
Summit Lakes
Kaicasa
Faith Landing RPUD
Tree Farm MPUD
Boxwood RPUD
Eden Gardens
Woodcrest
Total
BCC District
Tenure
Units Built
Source: Collier County Technology & GIS Support Section, July 2010
Tables 3. and 4. below reflect the existing and approved affordable-workforce housing units
within Collier County, as of July 2010. This information is based on the best available data. and
the data sources are the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies and the
Collier County Technology and GIS Support Section ofthe Growth Management Division.
Assisted Housing Inventory
Bear Creek - Naples
Belvedere Apartments
Brittany Bay
Brittany Bay II
College Park
Collier Housing Alternatives
Crestview Park
2367 Bear Creek Drive
260 Quail Forest Boulevard
14815 Triangle Bay Drive
14925 Lighthouse Road
6450 College Park Circle
4211 Thomason Drive
2903 Lake Trafford Road
3
Affordable Housing Major Issue
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
120
162
184
208
210
10
208
715 Crestview Drive
550 Hope Circle
1375 Boxwood lane
1375 Boxwood lane
Marion lake South of Westclox
2702 W. Immokalee Drive
1800 Farm Worker Way
1022 Garden lake Circle
350 10th Street North
950 Goodlette Rd N
1109 Hickcock lane
4250 Jefferson lane
2155 Great Blue Drive
3401 21st Ave SW
601 W Delaware Ave
612 North 11th Street
326 Third St.
100 Jasmine Circle
5460 laurel Ridge lane
104 Anhinga Circle
10555 Noah's Circle
580 Oakhaven Circle
100 Ospreys landing
8685 Saddlebrook Circle
2411-2488 Sanders Pines Circle
105 Manor Blvd.
105 Manor Blvd.
1802 Custer Ave.
1012 Summer Glen Blvd.
5520 Jonquil lane
5600 Jonquil Circle
2711 Wilton Court
8680 Weir Drive
7725 Tara Circle
11400 Whistler's Cove Blvd.
4700 Whistler's Green Circle
2580 Wild Pines lane
1836 Ash lane
11086 Windsong Circle
Crestview Park II
Cypress Run
Eden Gardens
Eden Gardens II
Eden Gardens Supportive Housing
Esperanza Place Rental
Farmworker Village Phase VI
Garden lake Apartments
George Washington Carver
Goodlette Arms
Her Villas Immokalee
Heritage
Heron Park
Housing Alternatives Of SW Florida
Immokalee Apartments
Immokalee Senior
Jackson Apartments
Jasmine Cay
laurel Ridge
Main Street Village
Noah's landing
Oakhaven
Ospreys landing
Saddlebrook Village Apartments
Sanders Pines
Saxon Manor Isles Apartments
Saxon Manor Isles Apartments II
So Villas Immokalee
Summer Glen
Summer lakes Apartments
Summer lakes II
Timber Ridge of Immokalee
Tuscan Isle
Villas of Capri
Whistler's Cove
Whistler's Green
Wild Pines of Naples II
Willowbrook Place
Windsong Club
Total
Source: Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, July 2010
4
Affordable Housing Major Issue
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
96
40
51
37
4
45
641
66
70
250
41
320
248
12
100
30
10
72
78
79
264
160
176
140
40
128
124
35
45
140
276
34
298
235
240
168
104
42
120
6161
Table 4. Collier County Affordable Housin Inventory, 2010
Arrowhead PUD
Artesia Point (Habitat)
Ave Maria
Bosley Apartments
Botanical Place
Boxwood RPUD
Bristol Pines
Buckley Mixed Use
Carson Lakes
Charlee Estates
Cirrus Pointe
Cypress Glen
Faith Landing RPUD (Habitat)
Heritage Bay DRI
Independence
Kaicasa
Liberty Landing (Habitat)
Meridian Village PUD
North Naples Research & Technology
Palermo Cove
Regal Acres (Habitat)
Rockedge PUD
Santa Barbara Landings
Summit Lakes (Waterways Villas)
Trail Ridge (Habitat)
Tree Farm MPUD
Victoria Falls
Warm Springs
Woodcrest (Habitat)
Total
Source: Collier County Technology and GIS Support Section, July 2010
Owner & Rental
Owner Occupied
Owner & Rental
Rental
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner or Rental
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Owner Occupied
Immokalee
Naples
Naples/lmm
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Immokalee
Naples
Immokalee
Immokalee
Immokalee
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
Naples
186/186
280/0
1900/48
303/303
64/64
41/0
32/32
11/0
83/83
122/122
44/0
10/10
175/0
160/66
156/156
400/0
162/90
24/0
4/0
52/0
184/14
111/0
29/0
303/0
204/204
64/0
110/110
72/0
66/0
5,352/1,488
Current and Projected Affordable Housing Demand
The University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies has been designated by the Florida
Legislature as the agency responsible for maintaining data on affordable housing needs and household
demographics for all counties in the state of Florida. The majority of source data for the housing needs
assessment comes from the 2000 U.S. Census and is updated with current information from building
permit activity and property appraiser data.
Tables 5a.-5e. reflect the Shimberg Center's 2010-2030 projections of the number of households
in Collier County by income level, including very low-income, low-income and moderate-
income persons/households earning less than, or equal to, 50%, 80% and 120% of the County's
area median income (AMI), respectively.
5
Affordable Housing Major Issue
Tables 5a.-5e. Collier County Household Income and Cost Burdened Household Data for Years 2010 -2030
Household
Count
2010 Owner 0-30% AMI 6490 2015 Owner 0-30% AMI 7213
2010 Owner 30.1-50% AMI 7398 2015 Owner 30.1-50% AMI 8296
2010 Owner 50.1-80% AMI 16942 2015 Owner 50.1-80% AMI 18898
2010 Owner 80.01-120% AMI 21794 2015 Owner 80.01-120% AMI 24208
2010 Owner 120+% AMI 49238 2015 Owner 120+% AMI 54562
Total Owner Count 101,862 Total Owner Count 113,177
2010 Renter 0-30% AMI 5940 2015 Renter 0-30% AMI 6490
2010 Renter 30.1-50% AMI 4253 2015 Renter 30.1-50% AMI 4626
2010 Re nter 50.1-80% AMI 8197 2015 Renter 50.1-80% AMI 8880
2010 Renter 80.01-120% AMI 6023 2015 Renter 80.01-120% AMI 6517
2010 Renter 120+% AMI 8393 2015 Renter 120+% AMI 9123
Total Renter Count 32,806 Total Renter Count 3S,636
Total Household Count 134,668 Total Household Count 148,813
30.1-50% (cost burdened households) 19,976 30.1-50% (cost burdened households) 21,971
50+% (cost burdened households) 15,966 50+% (cost burdened households) 17,631
~ 30% ln2I cost burdened households) 98,726 ~ 30% ln2I cost burdened households} 109,211
Table 5c. (Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010) Table 5d. (Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010)
2020 Household Demographic Data 2025 Household Demographic Data
Household
Count
2020 Owner 0-30% AMI 8107 2025 Owner 0-30% AMI 9042
2020 Owner 30.1-50% AMI 9433 2025 Owner 30.1-50% AMI 10673
2020 Owner 50.1-80% AMI 21330 2025 Owner 50.1-80% AMI 23919
2020 Owner 80.01-120% AMI 27184 2025 Owner 80.01-120% AMI 30303
2020 Owner 120+% AMI 61055 2025 Owner 120+% AMI 67698
Total Owner Count 127,109 Total Owner Count 141,635
2020 Renter 0-30% AMI 7133 2025 Renter 0-30% AMI 7762
2020 Renter 30.1-50% AMI 5055 2025 Renter 30.1-50% AMI 5465
2020 Renter 50.1-80% AMI 9659 2025 Renter 50.1-80% AMI 10394
2020 Renter 80.01-120% AMI 7069 2025 Renter 80.01-120% AMI 7571
2020 Renter 120+% AMI 9962 2025 Renter 120+% AMI 10737
Total Renter Count 38,878 Total Renter Count 41,929
Total Household Count 165,987 Total Household Count 183,564
30.1-50% (cost burdened households) 24,367 30.1.50% (cost burdened households) 26,764
50+% (cost burdened households) 19,639 50+% (cost burdened households) 21,693
~ 30% ln2I cost burdened households} 121,981 < 30% ln2I cost burdened households) 135,107
6
Affordable Housing Major Issue
Table Se. (Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010)
2030 Household Demographic Data
Household
Count
2030 Owner 0-30% AMI 9952
2030 Owner 30.1-50% AMI 11888
2030 Owner 50.1-80% AMI 26452
2030 Owner 80.01-120% AMI 33323
2030 Owner 120+% AMI 74116
Total Owner Count 155,731
2030 Renter 0-30% AMI 8356
2030 Renter 30.1-50% AMI 5848
2030 Renter 50.1-80% AMI 11077
2030 Renter 80.01-120% AMI 8026
2030 Renter 120+% AMI 11459
Total Renter Count 44,766
Total Household Count 200,497
30.1-50% (cost burdened households) 29,068
50+% (cost burdened households) 23,669
~ 30% tnm cost burdened households) 147,760
As the tables above show, a total of 77,037 households in the County will earn less than 120% of
the AMI in year 2010. This number is projected to grow to 114,922 households by year 2030.
Further, the County's projected total household count by year 2030 will be approximately
200,497.
In addition to the number of households projected to earn less than 120% of the AMI, the cost
burdened household projections indicate that in 2010 approximately 35,942 households (27%) are
cost burdened, spending greater than thirty percent of their household income on housing related
expenses, and that number is projected to increase to 52,737, or 26 percent, of the County's
households by year 2030.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation to Address Mfordable Housing
The data suggest there is a current deficit of available affordable-workforce housing units;
however, the actual deficit is unknown. The downturn in the housing market over recent years
has increased the number of market rate, unrestricted (not subject to regulatory control of rental
or sale price, occupant income level, time period to remain affordable, etc.), affordable units
within the County. In fact, during the second quarter of 2009, approximately 68.1%' of the units
sold were affordable to households earning the local area median income. However, more recent
data from the fourth quarter of 2009 reveal that only 60.8%2 of the residential units sold were
affordable, indicating the trend may be reversing. As a result, maintaining a requirement to
provide restricted affordable-workforce housing units within the County is both prudent and
necessary .
1 Source: Collier County Housing and Human Services, April 2010
2 Source: Ibid
7
Affordable Housing Major Issue
In order to keep pace with the demand for affordable-workforce housing within the County, the
production of both affordable rental and homeownership units will need to continue. The
following is a summary of the projected increase in cost burdened households in Collier County,
by year and growth rate.
Years
2010 - 2015
2015 - 2020
2020 - 2025
2025 - 2030
Average Annual Increase in
Cost Burdened Households
732 Units/Year
881 UnitsjYear
890 Units/Year
856 UnitsjYear
Based on the above data from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies,
July 2010, the County will need, on average per year, approximately 840 units over the next
twenty years to meet projected affordable-workforce housing demand. This total reflects a 160
unit decrease in the number of units required per year from the last evaluation period ending in
year 2004. This data suggest that Goal I of the Housing Element, which requires 1000
affordable-workforce units per year to be constructed, can be decreased to approximately 850
units. It should be noted that as economic conditions continue to fluctuate, so will the future
need for affordable-workforce housing within the County. However, there is presently, and will
continue to be, a need for an additional supply of restricted affordable-workforce housing.
In an effort to meet the above referenced affordable-workforce housing demand within the
County, the Housing Element provides the necessary guidance for the development of future
plans, programs and policies to create the required adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and
affordable housing units for all current and future residents.
Additionally, the County will continue to work with not-for-profit and for-profit providers of
affordable housing to increase private/public partnerships and financial incentives; address local
development regulations and land use issues; continue to eliminate substandard housing; and,
continue to increase the number of affordable housing programs and funding opportunities to its
residents, in order to meet the projected affordable-workforce housing needs for area residents,
including very low, low and moderate income households.
It should be noted that at the December 16, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Public
Hearing, the BeC was presented an in-house affordable housing inventory study in an attempt to
estimate the number of units that would qualify under the affordable housing program's various
income thresholds. Based upon the BCC direction from that meeting, the results of that study
have been provided as support documentation to the 2011 EAR.
8
Affordable Housing Major Issue
The following pages are the results of the market rate affordable housing
study directed by the Collier Board of County Commissioners.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Presentation of the 2010 countywide affordable housing inventory.
OBJECTIVE:
To present the 2010 countywide affordable housing inventory to the Board of County
Commissioners (BCC) - inclusive of "restricted" (restricted by regulatory requirements, e.g.
Affordable Housing Agreement) and "unrestricted" (market rate) residential units.
CONSIDERATIONS:
At the June 22, 2010, Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meeting, staff was directed to
inventory unrestricted residential units within the County to determine the number of units that
can be categorized as "affordable" based on qualifying criteria of the State Housing Initiatives
Program (SHIP), and then present the results to the Board.
To create the inventory of unrestricted affordable housing units within the County, staff
conducted multiple GIS queries of the Property Appraiser's database in order to identify the
affordable mortgage ranges for the very low (50% of the County's median income), low (80% of
the County's median income) and moderate (120% of the County's median income) income
levels (refer to specific categories in the attachment titled "Staff Analysis").
Staff mapped the affordable housing inventory for each Commission District (and, at the request
of Commissioner Fiala, who has taken the lead on this directive, for the East Naples Civic
Association (ENCA) boundaries) using the following parameters, which yields twelve (12)
different scenarios:
. affordable housing categories - very low, low and moderate income;
. household size - two and four persons (as agreed to by the BCC on June 22, 2010); and,
. monthly recurring debt - $0 and $300 (as possible representative figures of household debt.
such as student loan, car payment. credit card, etc.).
The detailed results and mapping per the above parameters are provided as attachments to this
Executive Summary; importantly, the explanation of the information depicted on the maps is
contained within the attached "Staff Analysis." The range of housing units, qualifying as
affordable, by specified area, appears in the table below.
Area 2 -Person Household/SO% of Median 4 -Person Householdl120% of Median
Income/$300 Recurrin!: Debt: # DUs Income/SO Recurrin!: Debt: # DUs
District 1 1,185 (28% oftotal) 30,293 (24% of total)
District 2 503 (12% of total) 24,455 (19"10 of total)
District 3 1,068 (26% of total) 31,492 (25% of total)
District 4 691 (16% of total) 17,837 (14% of total)
District 5 762 (18% oftotaI) 23,067 (18% of total)
Total 4.209 127.144
ENCA 1,246 (30% of total) 33,875 (27% oftotal)
I. The urnt counts mclude all ownership dwellmg wuts, except mobile home and cooperative units.
2. There are 196,241 dwelhng units in the County, inclusive of all unit types and both ownership & rental.
BCC Directed Affordable Housing Inventory
Bee Hearing Date 12/14/10
Page 1 on
It should be noted that the dwelling unit figures in the 120% column are cumulative, i.e. the
figures in that column include those units within the 50% column and all other scenarios not
shown in the table (see attached "Staff Analysis" for further explanation). The above ranges of
countywide totals (4,209 and 127,144) represent 2% and 65% of the total dwelling units
(196,241) in Collier County (includes all dwelling unit types in both ownership and rental units).
Additionally, the inventory results above provide only the potential supply of unrestricted
affordable housing units based on sales data for a single year (May 2009 - May 2010). It is
unknown how many of these units are actually available and how many of these units may be
presently occupied by persons meeting the qualifying income levels. Further, these data do not
provide the actual demand (need) for affordable housing units within the County.
Based upon a recent compilation of existing restricted units prepared for the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) using best available data. the County currently has an inventory of
7,649 (plus 3,864 units approved but not yet built) restricted affordable housing units. This
inventory will fluctuate over time as additional units are approved and constructed within the
affordable housing categories, and as affordable units reach the end of the time period for which
they are required to remain at an affordable price range. Objective I of the Housing Element
presently states, "The number of new affordable-workforce housing units shall increase by at
least fifteen percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than
1,000 units per year averaged over a five-year period in an effort to continue meeting the current
and future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low and moderate incomes, including
households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County."
However, the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies indicates a need for
an additional 732 affordable housing units each year beginning in year 2010 to 2015; 881
affordable housing units each year beginning in year 2015 to 2020; 890 affordable housing units
each year beginning in year 2020 to 2025; and, 856 affordable housing units each year beginning
in year 2025 to 2030. As part of the EAR, staffwill be recommending the Objective be changed.
This inventory of unrestricted affordable housing units may also be useful in supporting the
recommendation to lower the requirement in this Objective.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The information presented has no fiscal impact, as this is an informational item only.
GROWfH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMP ACT:
The information presented has no GMP impact, as this is an informational item only.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no legal considerations, as this is an informational item only. -STW
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners accept the methodology and findings
in this Executive Summary and associated attachments; and, direct staff to submit these
documents with the Evaluation and Appraisal Report as data and analysis that could potentially
support the County's recommendation to reduce the number of restricted affordable housing
units that are required to be constructed annually.
BCC Directed Affordable Housing Inventory
Bee Hearing Dale 12/14/10
Page 2 of3
Prepared by: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Land
Development Services Department, Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation
Attachments: 1) Staff Analysis 2) Affordable Housing Map Series
BCC Directed Affordable Housing Inventory
BCC Hearing Date 12/14/10
Page 3 of 3
Staff Analysis - BCC Directed Affordable Housing Project
Steps to create the inventory of "unrestricted" affordable housing units within the County:
. Conduct a GIS query from the Property Appraiser's database of all residential sales from May
2009 through May 20 I 0, by the closing sales price, and based on the State Housing Initiatives
Program (SHIP) 20 I 0 income limits for two and four person households, and assuming that
those households have no (SO) monthly recurring debt. The affordable mortgage for those
households earning 50% (very low), 80% (low) and 120% (moderate) of the County's median
income of $72,300 is as follows:
a. A 2- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$74,952; and, a 4- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of$103,430.
b. A 2- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$143,576; and, a 4- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of$189,260.
c. A 2- person household earning 120% of the median income could afford a mortgage
of $235,259; and, a 4- person household earning 120% ofthe median income could
afford a mortgage of $303,607.
. Conduct a GIS query from the Property Appraiser database of all residential sales from May
2009 through May 2010, by the closing sales price, and based on the SHIP 2010 income limits
for 2 and 4 person households, and assuming that those households have a three hundred
dollar (S300.00) monthly recurring debt. The affordable mortgage for those households
earning 50% (very low), 80% (low) and 120% (moderate) of the County's median income of
$72,300 is as follows:
a. A 2- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$27,489; and, a 4- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of $55,967.
b. A 2- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$96,113; and, a 4- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of$141,496.
c. A 2- person household earning 120% of the median income could afford a mortgage
of$187,796; and, a 4- person household earning 120010 of the median income could
afford a mortgage of$256,143.
. Establish a "discount" factor for the specified one-year period by comparing the Sales Price
to the Total Just Values for qualifying properties (affordable housing threshold range of $0 -
$303,607), followed by averaging the percentage change (sum of percentage change for all
properties divided by the total number of properties) for those same properties; this yielded a
discount factor of -12.42 percent
1
. Apply the established discount factor of -12.42 to the countywide residential inventory to
derive the number of affordable units at the various affordable mortgage thresholds described
above.
The following two tables depict the number of unrestricted housing units categorized as
affordable, organized by Commission District and the area encompassed by the East Naples
Civic Association (ENCA). This data provides the potential supply of affordable housing units.
However, it is unknown how many of these units are actually available; it is unknown how many
of these units may be presently occupied by persons meeting the qualifying income levels; and,
the data does not identify the demand (need) for affordable housing units. The need for
affordable housing by geographic area may be more readily identified using the 2010 Census
data, once it is released.
It should be noted that the dwelling unit figures listed in each row is cumulative. For example, in
District 1, the 4-person household count within the 50010 median income range includes those
units within the 2-person household count within the 50% median income range, and the 4-
person household count within the 120% median income range includes all units listed in the
table for District 1. Similarly, the data shown on the attached maps also reflect cumulative
figures.
$300 Monthly Recurring Debt
500Al of Median Income 80% of Median Income 120% of Median Income
2-Person 4-Person 2-Person 4-Person 2-Person 4-Person
Area Household Household Household Household Household Household
District 1 1,185 2,389 10,422 17,180 21,540 27,768
District 2 503 1,388 3,691 10,572 16,588 21,796
District 3 1,068 2,412 9,307 18,214 24,285 29,645
District 4 691 1,787 4,680 10,479 13,779 16,486
District 5 762 2,570 8,237 14,767 19,202 22,226
Total 4,209 10,546 36,337 71,212 95,394 117,921
ENCA 1,246 2,932 12,523 22,676 27,966 32,463
lbe unrt counts InClude all ownershIp dwellmg umts, except roo bile home and cooperative umts.
lbere are I %,241 dwelling units in the COWlty, inclusive of all unit types and both ownership & rental.
Overall, the above table shows District 3 contains the largest inventory of potential affordable
housing units, followed by District 1, and District 4 contains the least amount.
2
The following identifies each respective Commission District's highest range of affordable
housing dwelling units as a percentage of the countywide dwelling unit total (196,241) in Collier
County (includes all dwelling unit types in both ownership and rental units).
District 1: The highest (27,768) dwelling unit count represent 14 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 2: The highest (21,796) dwelling unit count represent II percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 3: The highest (29,645) dwelling unit count represent 15 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 4: The highest (16,486) dwelling unit count represent 8 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 5: The highest (22,226) dwelling unit count represent 11 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
$0 Monthly Recurring Debt
50% of Median Income 80% of Median Income 120% of Median Income
2-Person 4-Person 2-Person 4-Person 2-Person 4-Person
Area Household Household Household Household Household Household
District 1 5,513 11,941 17,365 21,679 26,301 30,293
District 2 2,033 4,604 11,003 16,733 20,514 24,455
District 3 5,437 11,225 18,381 24,474 27,619 31,492
District 4 2,681 5,480 10,610 13,905 15,720 17,837
District 5 4,844 9,206 14,961 19,351 21,471 23,067
Total 20,508 42,456 72,320 96,142 111,625 127,144
ENCA 6,655 14,778 22,884 28,177 31,414 33,875
1be umt counts mclude all ownership dwellmg Wlits, except mo bile home and cooperative units.
lbere are I %,241 dwelling units in the County, inclusive of all Wlit types and both ownership & rentaL
Overall, the above table shows District 3 contains the largest inventory of potential affordable
housing units, followed by District 1, and District 4 contains the least amount.
3
The following identifies each respective Commission District's highest range of affordable
housing dwelling units as a percentage of the countywide dwelling unit total (196,241) in Collier
County (includes all dwelling unit types in both ownership and rental units).
District I: The highest (30,293) dwelling unit count represent 15 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 2: The highest (24,455) dwelling unit count represent 13 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 3: The highest (31,492) dwelling unit count represent 16 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 4: The highest (17,837) dwelling unit count represent 9 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 5: The highest (23,067) dwelling unit count represent 12 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
4
..
.
N-
.. :~
.0 -N.,
e.c ao- -!
O::;~a
:::-~
_O.Ci~
;:l:a;:
_0.&-
.. 0 C c E
::"E:.:
o":.u
;",1):''-
NII::a
....S:
~~:~~Ii
:tt~.I:~:
o""~.-
~ ~.:.. I
.... c::
o -;;
-:I
...-
o
..
...
..
.-
.-
." tot.!
.. .
o --
;-:~.~
o.;_a
u . ... - Ill:
~:::!
c:l:-::
.e_&-
:; 0 c;: c: E
:;~.:
O..::g
...~CI.~
o 0'" '"
.....;..
.......
.c!.O ..
"O,,!':
00-:;
~~:~:
0....-0..
...J:.
"0 c..
.-;
_:I
...-
o
a
..
e-
.-
:! ..;!
..: ~:
~:;!;
41."_0
c;: 2 C I: 0
_ 0 0 :1-
.Z.O"
. tl .1;!
;OCIlt!
. ~ ': . E
. . a.. .0
.. :s c u
" U.
..NU-....""
o ....
&'II .. . 0,
.:KS:
.c...o....
.. tilt_a
...0 .a~
00..'"
~;~::;
::i:'8
; ..,:
_ c
...:1.
: -I
I
..,
'"
~
~
....
Iii
I-
Z
::;
;i
t-
O
I-
J
.
..,-. .-+~.----.;.-.~^...~
"
~l
,.. ~i
-~T........:
: ~... i
; !, '
.
~
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
..;;
!::
z
::;
...
~
o
I-
.
...:li~--~--'
"
O'
~-
~i
Jll
........illrr.., ~ .~.'.....
' i'
I. ii
e. .:
...
'"
....
ci
""
qj
t-
Z
;:)
...
~
o
1-
1
.
tIl.D~'
II
~.
~l
...,~._-_.,~~
,.-r1
.. ..
<
~J
~ ..1
! .. -;: I'
.: ::
;::~Ol
:::...:
-00:-
cSEo.
~c.l!
'VoceS
~ ; ~ :.:.
o....u
. ..
0"::;
:~~=:
:~o.:
....o.;.ali
00..:
#~.c~:
0":.-
flit.......
~: :c:
o .-;;
;~
.
..
..
..
..:;:
';u
..-::
. ....
. J: ,.," ,.
~::C!C
u ... e
r::#~"'o
_60._
.:1::1::
MCDE-
:; 0 co tC !
.~~.:
:: ::u
~....o.~
0. .:.
NO..'a
-:-.':
,&_o.~
~ --..
';~.::
~~~~~
:~i::~
0(:
-.;
, .
..:I
...-
.
"
..
..
--:=
.. u
.. 0-;:
o ....
e.c: -.
~:~~Q
u,,-..c
. 2 C c: 0
_00:11-
.:%20:
.c.&-
;occE
. : -: . E
2.-.0,
6. " .o!
~~ ~~)oJ
o 0....
H-.O..
.;..~
.&:...0.2
:o-:;;~
DO. · ...
~:-~;!
::i:"
0( .
'; 1;1
F.i
" ;
i
. ....
!
,.:
'"
-
~
-,-~._~-.-;
""
.
~iC
1"
::
:1
.~.:
if
/:
it)
I-
%
;:)
~
~
rt
;' "'-
S
II
II
i..
..
.
.
'i;;
-
ttf
'"
ib
l-
%
;:)
....
:!
2
~
.
./llW."
o
.
r ~..~,.'~".,.." '.' ii...
~:;ji;Y~__C - ;: ~;~:.' :
/ ~. ....
j '. i
f.
'"
'"
.
'"
.
ib
!-
%
;:)
....
<
o
l-
.
f.l~
-r"-
_Uj_" ;1
"
.'
. ~1
~J
a
'I
"'m~
. '.
;~I
.. 0,
:! -:
.0.",;:
E::a.Q
0.__
:::~:
-0:1:$-
I: Z 0"
. II ..
;:=:i
e:=.E
1:.:'.0
O":_Co1
;;":::
"'.11:'0""
."oS.
~.:o.:
..o:.~
00 ...
"'......
i/." ...
:~=:;
..:-.,:
o c
."
.D_
.
o
...
p-
p-
.. ';2-
- ...
..:~"~
E...c~A
0..
o . C:... Ie
J: :I 0 C 0
_0:1":-
Z o.
:c: :E.!
-o_<lE
-: ~ ; :;
:I:o.uj
;N:f:l
N:-.:
':.::.!;
.... .,....
-:-.-:;
O~ .~:
"'';11:0-
g...::'D
-:t::
o
:;; 10
.-
o
,
II
C_
,.-
- .
.. ..-
.. .
..: ~-:
E .. . · a
0....-
Q_c.c
I: ::II 0 C 0
_oa:a-
,. ...
:.:E!
-o-<lE
-: ~ :: . E
I! . ~ .0
.. II . U
:":~~
o .....
rc:..O..
.. :Ii.
.00 ....
;:":.!;I
o......~
"'0 .~
0.. . '" ...
~".I:~':
0,......"
..ie,:
.. 'c
: :'1
..
a'
~
.
,.. .._..~.... ~!
~.=' ~ --::'..
. Ii .
~
'"
'"
""
W
I-
%
:::>
~
~
,
-l~ijr-r
, "
I.
...
..,
..,
<ri
...
.0
....
%
:::>
-'
<(
t-
o
...
-'--~
""
~
.;
Iii
!::
z
:::>
-'
~
~
. .,'
,1/
"
?
.
-li..'.'_.,......
,* ~!
,~-----~
i; ....... ~
!' ..
!
g:
.
,-
..
."
.. -
...
-0 :~
:.:~::
o:~!c;;
.. . e
e: :J ... ·
-..:~
c:Z o.
~ I: = E ~
:::<1
11 ; ; :.:
0...0.'*
.. ...
0....--
H.:;:
....0..
~!:.!;
;:*:~
~":..-::
ON.c.-
f1f..............
..:i:.:
o
.--f
.-~..
~
-i
N
CD
~
~
:::>
..J
~
o
,..
,---------'
i-;"<Fv'-;;~~..~___~_.~
.
T
O.
~i
... "',,__,..............JI
~ ..... to '
~ "'.
/t'
il
.,
Rf
l
J..;/
'.
...
o'
..
.
.,,-
! ;:
..:~; :;
;::!Q
o. c: II:
c,o';o
_oa:t-
r: Z .0:
wccE-
:;o-c&
.~~.e
..:'.0
o..:_U
~",.:"
o ....c:a
N-C6"
. ... 0 2 .
:'::;~;
::.~~
......-
~~:~;
-:ic!
..
?
'"
tt
;::
'"
I:::
z
::;
...J
g
l-
.
~;
.~
~
iiI-"-(..,'" ~!
~:
!:
.
.. -..fit
I.
...
.. j
. ;;1
" :;l
..:!'_:i
E ..c --
0.....-0
'" . c .. c
c: :: : ~
c:a:: 0"
.c:E~
;o_Ce
. ~ :: . E
a: . :I .0
& U . U
o ". I
..... 0'" >-
0, .....
"'-.:"11
:E:.!
.. ...-:11
'::.:~
t"lI .....,
"'';.I:~!
::=:"
l C .
~ .-
f
.i
!
o
..
~--~- M.-'
j
.'.....,.(
,...""':,
;;
~
Z
:::>
.....
~
o
i-
"
~
........ .......((J
I- ~,
.. ~:
i
i
~!;
...~-,
! .... ( :...... . _' i
i" ......t~ ~!;. ...... I
" ....r.......u. .....ftei..:",c;,1
. r l.-{.,....' ."i. ..: ~
: __ -~i~"~l:f;:; '.' I
:: ;..~~ 1..
" ....
,..
..
~
: - '-----~~
.;: t:
!:: ~i(?
. 0 ... ~ .;.
E:!,.; <_
0."-0 ~::~
:;;;:: ~~~
-ooa" ~:I_ ;
o:::II.oJ 1ll<2i' I
....E_I a;l.I.< ,1
; 0 c C ~ ! ...J ~ ~ .;
· :: -;; · Uh- '< 0 !:i j I
...... t-"z::> _~_
IL · . . 0 - <III!:~'O! '
o ct__ I-fI)...- i
;; .. ~ :: :.: ~ i'-",
N..OZ ~j ~ ,",,! <'\
· .. · a .- it I \' H t ;
~'=:~: ~-~--..
;::.-:- II
~~.I: ~ = :
0..=:....
""'1__
..- <C,:
'; ~;
..-
.
o
.. -'
- .
"'0
,,-
.:: ".;!
E .. - . ..
o:~-:
o :s II: ... ..
':0;:<
c:r:. 0 g
:;:;E
: ~ ~ . f,,)
I:.~...
.. u · .
~N::a;
.. . .
N~~:Z
;~o.';
.. --.
.. ....
... Q . .
o~.&~:
#N:O'"
::J~~
o
..
:;-
.
..
';
..
..
i
:f'i
"j
i
.
l
i
_I
:
Jf.
us
!-
Z
:;t;(:DV) i
-J.i:!.~ if
~~::
~~~
-::e-
Ill<~
5~:t I
<....... I.
o ~.. Smt..,......M__..._--.-
!-iir::;-;""",."" '~
~! ~I \ '.'''_.
~I ~I \. ~ I '\
t, ~f .\ '! .
~..:.
II I
I .
I '"
I ,,~!,.c
.. i ~
: -;~ z
CO :?.,
o :;: 3 ~ ~ "I,
:~~..~ !Z;~
0:::: W.j>
~.c.. g~~
!OD:lC fl}.c2
cZSOv ~l.4..if
_1::.'_ .....I~,.J., !
-oo.~ <0'" ~
"II -;:.u t;z5__ j ___
: = ~ ::. .... iil::; ""'....",. l
o ... : ~ ~ J ~: 1'-,-.
r C'f ... Q, hi ;;::'
0.:0. il ~,
......z !l ~'
· 0 .. ---JOl---..h-
~ lIoo : :; : . II ; ~
;~=~;: ' '
at fit ~.:!--1
::J.:~_.._
'; .;; 1 t
:; =-k-
. !
..
.-
=-1
,.; c .
'a o!. I
".
.0 ...
E:~..u
0."-0
u ...... ..
c:: :lIl C C .
-oo:ac
l: 2: 2: 0 0
-c:oE-
;;oee.:
.::'.";
:I.;..~
0" ..f-~'""""T
.. ::;'1 '
:.::;
......Ir.
~~o.:
_0-;: ,~.
00: . .
$.~..c~=
'" .. 0...
:: : i : .. i;
. -; ~ ~ ~~~It'$~
.::>! ,:
._1 it
.
..
...
...
...
~.
_~,_..f")fY
o
I-
z
;::)!...
;;l.:~
~:~
W> H
C=:::i
iii~:&
1lJ...<
Cl:w'"
...J-J.J.
~e!:i
~~i
~!
i
,
~
Ii
ft
...
~
.0
,.,N,.
o
.. l-
.! %
~a I :::>"'....
.0' ~fil~ t'
. :: ;: 0:> en "1
..c~.! ~>::
c--.u _-I""":
.....-. ii.i:&;S
o;~....: w<~
1:;:;4 o::1i'T
c .0 ~$5 .
~ ~.f: ~ -r g~.i-f^iO~r-..ij..
: :: t; ~i ~I \\ ,i
;; .. : ': :! ~1 I! '<,:- '!
N...Zr--~-~ .
· : << :&... i i~ I
.It.. Co . . , .
.. --.
...:-:11
0"'...:.....
~.;::.e
:;:~t=:
'; ~ ~ r,. r
~-_.~
<,i
..
...
"-
.;c
.. ...
-; ;;
. ~ ~ -
&--."
::::::
!;:::
"'E.
:c..e~
-osee>
-: = ~ . u I
s: . ~ ..
o &. v :..! ~
...... Ii... sa.
0.:;_
N .. 11::1 Z
. . ~
.1:.,.0_.
.... .-.
-:.:-
o~.c~~
6l"~O_
:~.::.
c::
';
~
i
tC
...
2'
:::>~'"
...JaM
< .":
~~~
l!i:::is.:
-j=
m~~
D:Uj'"
-J-J..l.
<0'"
!-z5
~ii.i~
i
:::j
'I
I
It
t'
------<<" rl.:.....--.--
. 'fi\lifBn:~ . ;
: l
, '''-.
\. : '-.....
\..."\"c:; ll! 1 ~,
, Ii
..
~
~-
- ..
. ..
~ -;
o lIl.- fI
..1:-.-
S-.t:_CI
. ~ ..
O.C_"
g :s 0 c .
~o.:c
C::a: _. Q
~:~..cE
.. · .. · u
· ... :s ..
Ii! . u " .
o"...:!
pNO_..
a · 0 .
"-..z
. : 0 ....
.&::"",0__
- "'...
0_...
; ~ · ~ : il
: =-: : :tk H.""....-
....e: ~
~ '..
0...:) ,
...-
.
..
- ~ ----'" - - --.....,... -----
IT
"!
.,..._".fl!-:.~
: I
"-
..- : ~
..~
.:~. !
E..c.o
0...-.
u......
C :l 0 C "
-oa,e
c: Z mOo
~C!=;
-'0.. _
· . .. . u
. ; : :"
10" Q _!
"""NO....
o .....
.....::%j
. to. 0: ..'
~~:!:
-g..:.
., 0 . '0..
at~.c:=:
:....::.
.....~.:
~ ...
. -'"
...-
.
..
· 1
. :
..;
.:.
~ N;
o ~....
..a::_ _
E : ~ .~ :
6.C..
0:1 0 C .
1:0:&:1.
- '" .
'C . E ~
~::C!
""'."".u
· .. OJ .
II . Q . .
.:::-i
:; . ~ .
.. .. '" :IE Z I
.: ~:.!:'
.,; fII.._
0".11
~~.~~~
;t "' : : .. i ~4
: : i c = rlj
: ~ ~ j II
.o-~\IIO'
.
..
i
SJ
21
t'
-~.
""
<l>
""
..::
N
Iii
!:;
Z
::)N~
;i:{~
;:::"(>0
- ~,...
ill::';;.: j
mli
0::"'< ,
..J ~ '! I:
;5o!:i ~l
O:!;:;"-.<;ii~
.... (tl:li f,
~I \ I",,,",
Ii """-\, \; i ~
~,j
'"
N
.,
N
~".
Iii
....
Z
::;)....
...JNN
~~~
Z".",
""~;;.: I
99E= J.
[{J<~
tr I.I..~ ,;
..J~;:: !
i5o..J .J,l
g ~ j'r~""" /r;
! " k
a: \. II I ',-
91\ l' I
.--it- \,
,
1
;
d
~
z
::;)
..J ..
:$"'....
~M~
Z).:"::
w...>
~1i= I
""~~ j
O::wU;- /j
~ S 5 tiL----.
o z :;,.~,.__....' "
----r-- I- '(5 2S----r.~~T1\Y.> - ~
l -; \'"'_
<I \ 'I ,"'.
ii '.. II I
21
~
I
!
'ii
1
I
~-
. :!
- ".
.':~.':
!...u
o .... - 0
0.. C... .
II: :Ii 0 C .
-. II :s.
r::C _ 00; .
!c.::-;
'II 0 10. _
.....U
-:::.
.11. Co)_.,!
".0....
. ....
"...z
....02...
:!::.!;
_0_-:_
0:: .. 'G 100 i
$,.;.r::! '
::,...:::.
.........:;
'; ;;
...-
.
..
..
to
"'-
.. "
'II ;2
~-
0>-. "
e.c_ _
E:~!~
o. c... .
U :II 0 C .
!oE:sc
1I::t .: Q
~~~cE
.. . ... . to)
· . ::t .
::E. .. . .
Do II . .
~.:,:"i
:-.:;;
.::.:
.c:...._.
-o...a:.
-,. .
0", .. 11 ....
.. ."
~":~-
0,..._.....
..i-c:
'; ~;
.-
.
a
...
..
e-
.. "
.. "
..;:
o lJIrl... "
e.c:_._
!:~-:
o. c: ... .
0, II 0 C .
':oa:c
eX.! t,I
!:~C!1
'CI . L . U
. ... :I .
..0-.
oL,,~!
~.O"iD.
o · D .
"'-.1%
.:E:!:
_ ".a.
0_.11
'::-!:
#~:.e....
0","_...
Ift_~c..
'; ,... !i
.. :> L-...._.-ka~
.o_~ !
.
..
..
'"
".,
~
....
__M.,.,
;i;
I-
Z'"
~~;:; d
:S ,.: 0. _,
~~N
w>-:;.;
0""'..1
~~~ d
...JW. J\
<<55 tl-
g.l.it.....;';""~r
~! i\,;. ij f "~'~\
i'
i
I
it>
!::
z
;:)....'"
<i!~~
~~~
w~:;.;
0-.....
US~i
~...~ I
""'::l~ i
~ C)...J ~I '_. ___,
o 3; ~~_TO In
;I-w... , k
i!!: \"., I I "'\
_~~~ 1
i
~
t
!
lJl
<'!.
....
i'1
~
...J~O
< ....
!= ":.
_..N
... >- ..
W.o_
!ili::!
Ww<:l! j
u..< 1
C:::l~ il
~ C)!:j .,j L_.__
~. ~'.. i..r....noo r' l
. i ''''
ii!~. \ ." : : '""'.
IIi i. '\' I' I \
II!! ".
~
l
I
,I
'/
Concurrency Management
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) for their effect on
managing concurrency of development throughout the County.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Element is to ensure the availability of public facilities and
the adequacy of those facilities at adopted levels of service (LOS) concurrent with the impacts of
development. This is implemented by means of a concurrency management system that measures the
potential impact of a development permit application on minimum acceptable level of services, as
adopted in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Concurrency management provisions for the County include the guidelines and standards set forth by
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and describe the
administrative procedures pertaining to the application of concurrency and establish guidelines for
applying concurrency to each respective type of public facilities. The County manages concurrency to
effectively achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards, to ensure that infrastructure
capacity is available when needed to support development and that development pays its fair share
toward the cost of improvements.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation & Program Assessment
Over the last five years, the County has submitted financially feasible Capital Improvement Element
updates to the Florida Department of Community Affairs with sufficient revenues to meet demand at
adopted levels of service.
The Capital Improvement Element (CIE), along with the Land Development Code (WC) and Annual
Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) are the implementing documents providing
the system of guidelines and standards for managing concurrency. The combination of these three
documents ensures the County maintains a Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (the
Schedule) as a component of the CIE.
Levels of service standards (LOSS) for public facilities are established by Policy 1.5 of the CIE. The
LOSS for a specific type of public facility also appears in the corresponding GMP Element or Sub-
Element. Thirdly, the LOSS are found in the Adequate Public Facilities Requirements section of the
LDC. This duplication may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the LOSS do
not necessarily appear the same among them. Any discrepancies should be reconciled and a single
location, or less-redundant locations, selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE could be formatted
to provide the LOS standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures and the
LDC could provide for the administrative procedures - with informational references from one to the
others.
The County uses the AUIR to constantly evaluate levels of service for public facilities. The AUIR
incorporates the data and analysis to show the current, committed, and projected demands for
wastewater treatment, potable water supply, transportation, parks and recreation, stormwater
management and solid waste disposal, along with facilities not subject to concurrency. The AUIR
Concurrency Management - 1
summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecasts the capacity of existing and
planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long-range
capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. Improvements
needed to enhance or maintain the adopted LOS standards are identified and tracked in the ADIR.
Each ADIR, once approved by the BCC, forms the basis for the preparation of the next annual update
and amendment of the CIE Schedule.
The County conducted a level of service study in early 2007, which included a survey of level of
service standards in comparable counties throughout Florida along with an assessment of internal
measures. These findings were used in considering adjustments to LOS standards and ensuring that
capacity continues to meet demand.
For the purposes of illustration, the following excerpt from 2008 CIE update and amendment is
provided:
As adopted in the AUIR, the County has revised certain levels of service standards
(LOSS), as follows:
· The LOSS for County Regional Park facilities decreased from 2.9412 acres per 1,000
population in FY 07 to 2.9 acres per 1,000 in FY 08; and, the LOSS for County
Community Park facilities decreased from 1.2882 acres per 1,000 population in FY 07
to 1.2 acres per 1,000 in FY 08.
All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated
through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using
another method not involving expenditure of capital funds. One example is the 47 acre
Randall Curve interdepartmental transfer in exchange for regional park land at Big
Corkscrew Island Regional Park. These transactions represent changes to the value of
land holdings only.
· The LOSS for County Water facilities decreased from 185 gallons per capita per day
(gpcd) in FY 07 to 170 gpcd in FY 08 in accordance with the 2008 Water Master Plan,
approved by the BCC on June 24, 2008.
The LOSS change and projected decrease in population growth reported in the AUIR have
led to the existing potable water plants being able to maintain reliability longer without
plant expansions or new plant construction. The following changes were made to match
the June 11, 2008 population projections and resulting water demands:
* NERWTP: Changed new 8.75 MGD plant construction in FY 14 to new 7.5 MGD
plant construction in FY 18; Changed 6.0 MGD expansion in FY 23 to FY 26
* SERWTP: Changed new 8.0 MGD plant construction in FY 17 to new 6.0 MGD
plant construction in FY 22
The following changes were made to new potable water plant constructed capacity
schedule:
* SCRWTP: Changed 8.0 MGD expansion in FY 07 and 4.0 MGD in FY 08 to 12.0
MGD in FY 08 to match new SCRWTP wellfield delivery schedule
* NCRWTP: Changed 2.0 MGD high pressure RO expansion in FY 11 to FY 12 to
match the 2008 Water Master Plan
Concurrency Management - 2
· The LOSS at the North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) decreased from
145 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in FY 07 to 120 gpcd in FY 08 in accordance
with the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan, approved by the BCC on June 24,2008.
The LOSS change and projected decrease in population growth reported in the AUIR have
led to the existing wastewater treatment plants being able to maintain reliability longer
without plant expansions or new plant construction. The following changes were made to
match the June 11, 2008 population projections and resulting water demands:
* NCWRF: Deleted 6.5 MGD expansion in FY 15
* NEWRF: Changed 4.0 MGD plant construction in FY 15 to FY 18
* SEWRF: Changed 4.0 MGD plant construction in FY 17 to FY 18; Changed
2.0 MGD expansion in FY 22 to FY 24; Deleted 2.0 MGD expansion in FY 26
From the examples above, one can see how adjustments are made to LOSS based on changes in
population growth projections, compliance with updated public facility master plans or other factors
taken under consideration.
Each year the AUIR indicates whether level of service (LOS) deficiencies are projected in the County
during the next five-year planning period. Using the example of transportation planning, a
Deficiencies Report inventories the roadway links that are currently deficient or are projected to be
deficient under the concurrency system within the next five years and the programmed and proposed
solutions to solve these deficiencies. The data used to produce the Deficiencies Repon accounts for
factors such as background traffic and vested trips, and whether roadways are located in Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) or Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas (TCEA).
For purposes of illustration, the Deficiencies Repon from each of the three previous years' AUIR [in
both table and figure formats] is included with this evaluation.
Projects listed in the AUIR and the cm Schedule are described in a manner that enables their location
in the County to be identified. For purposes of illustration, the cm Schedule from each of the three
previous years' update and amendment is included with this evaluation.
The adopted AUIR appears as a Support Document listed by the Capital Improvement Element.
The BCC amended the cm related to the October 2008 adoption of "Public School Facilities"
provisions into the Growth Management Plan. These changes require the County to adopt, by
reference, into its Capital Improvement Element, the School District's annually updated financially
feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program in order to
achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for Public School Facilities. The School
District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan identifies the financially feasible school facility capacity
projects necessary to address existing deficiencies and future needs based on achieving and
maintaining adopted LOS standards for schools.
The CrE Schedule is supported by a projection of revenues and expenditures to demonstrate that
adequate funds are available, or would be available, in the respective identified funding sources to pay
for the improvements - and demonstrating the financial feasibility of the Schedule.
The Financial Feasibility section of the Capital Improvement Element states [fJuture development will
bear a proponionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's
payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any
public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of
Concurrency Management - 3
user fees, special assessments and taxes. Based on prior direction from the County Manager's Office
and Board of County Commissioners' policy, updates to the crn will be financially feasible
documents.
In order to maintain financial feasibility the County draws upon revenues derived from numerous
sources, including impact fees, grants and reimbursements, developer contributions, gas taxes,
revenues carried forward from previous years, revenues transferred from other funds, revenue reserves,
bond proceeds, user fees, and CRA and MSTU revenues.
It should be noted that Collier County has provided the DCA with a financially feasible Capital
Improvement Element in each of its annual updates. Departure from the preparation of a financially
feasible crn could result with major financial ramifications, and potentially place the County in a
position where it would have to abandon its five-year financially feasible CIE with the possibility of
forcing the County into long-term concurrency management. This would be contrary to existing BCC
policy direction.
Public participation meetings were held in early 2010 at different locations in the County. No public
comments were received related to concurrency management.
From all factors evaluated, staff can conclude that the concurrency management system has been
effective in achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standards, ensuring that
infrastructure capacity is available when needed to support development and that development is
paying its fair share toward the cost of improvements.
An assessment regarding the manner preferred to deal with the duplicative appearances of, and
discrepancies among, levels of service standards now appearing in multiple County documents should
be carried out with the decision resulting in EAR-based amendments.
Attachments
Concurrency Management - 4
z
o
iii
a:
'!i
z
o
;:::
0..
o
o
<<:
lr
o
o
'"
..
z
w
:IE
w
>
o
'"
0..
;!Ii
4!~
"0
iL~
:':~S1
. ...l<l
"Of/)
i!!!!:I~
~::>~
Wfil;t
~~
~...
z
::>
o
u
a:
w
::;
....I
o
U
9
~
~
it
:0
'"
..
-
c:
..
E
..
~
.5
]j
~
o
'5
..
"5
"C
-5
f/)
gggggSS8
i -'~~~~~~~~
o ~"'I..";7;"'''''<O
~ ~l:I :::~'"
..
88g880~C~gggg8gggg
~~~~~ ~~~~~~8!~
~I~N~~ "'~I~~" o~~
~,.. ~ III ::I ~I~"::I ::: ~ !
:::
w
(3
~"C
1:c "l1
E .. ..
1ll!' 8~
H
H ~~
~~ .,;c
~.a
I!!.!!! ~'"
.."
H .8
....
~~ i~
:5~ 2 E
!~ o..e
.,-
.- .. fill
";jiii ~"l1
~ c
~8 2l,a
IJ,w j!
CoO
~o ..
,,0.. Ujlf)
~~ b~
;~~ z'"
-seJg
.e~.g
~l~
~oi
-.,
l!!~~
0""
zsi
. ......
"D I!! ~~
I!!
..
.Q l'E=~8
a E
12 ~~~~~
c-
..'" ~fi~~
C ~
~ ill jtll~"i
"C ~ .
c = loll ~~~~E
'"3' ..
~"C~ :g!e.!
~!; 5~~:5g
E 0 ~~~O_
g~! eujj;
:~ a i! ~ t~
hi] ~'5isJ;8
il,s '" ~i.~~g
~j~
:egg fH~~
C.._ tI; ~ ~ '5
2..00
~~~ ~.!!!~.e~ ~
~I!!~~
::ii~ ~E"D~'tS i
.!! - 2!
~ -: & ilUH "
a: .! :55.i"a. !II
-"D"C C:.5"D~!! "
~U a:l Ci ., .Qa !? ~
"E~ftJ t=a.:; u. f ~
~Qlti l<'l~i:: ~
o ~.~ aJo ~ i
...-" i~;l~ 8
~~z ar-~ ~
u.!; 'a o ~go -
li E 41 : ~.!!s ~
-gE- ~Hp
ji! ~o '-= ii ....
..
"-.2 il~1:..; i
..l~ U"::.ElW
~~~~,!! i
~a.g ~~'5l!!i
"'is] ~.ojE ~
w~~ ..- E 11 ~ I
~..S_~~
~l~ ~~H~: !
I
!
i
!
I
l
!
(;
Concurrency Management - 5
I- 1~~1~8~~8~
z "'" 0 0
5 2 g ~
~ ~ .. l:I
..
8a8c~oagig~g~gg88
~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~
~ ~ ~~~;:-,~~~
::: .. .~"IO'
t- I~g~g~gg~
~ ~ lil 88
i ~ v ~~
C ~ ~ &tM
..
ooooooooooooooooo~
....g ......~..8g88g8g81~
~ ~~~~~~~~~
m ~ol~_~_m~~-
~ 6ft......1...6ft6l't.....
.. ..
..
z
8 0
~ ~
..
~g~8~ggl~
~ ~
:::
20000000000000000
is 8" "~"~8gg888g8
~ 8 8~~~~g~~
~ M ~~"~~;g~
.. ..
8 ~g~g~~ 8O~ ~~~~~8Ugn~~
.. 0 08
z ~8 ~ 1:; 0..- c ~g~88g ;:!:
::> ~~ c
0 Iil", q m... co,.... MO ~
0 N ~;;; ~ ~;;;~r; '"
~ ~::I ;;; .. .. ~
..
gS88Sg0g
!i Ot ~~g~8 8
8 ~ ~""'''''N '"
~1;:"""'"
..
g8g8ggog~g88gg808
~~ g ~~~~~~ ~
~...... ~ M,....~~~= M
M6i't ~ 6I't6l't"~6I't ~
'"
is I!!
1= 0
u Z
::> w
'" ....I
= 5_ (j ~
~ ~g ~(3.....
u ~~ ~ ~~ ,$~~~ ~
u~~~<<~~~o~~~u~~~~~
888S88~8888~8~o888
e ~ I ~
"5 ,,0 In ...-0
I': liS ~ ~ ~ ~ -8 5 ~ m
'iiO moaJ IU .- o~
i; ~ ic;1~ ~ S~ II
0-'; '" e~1il~> i!:l1l ..8 CD
~CC~~ 00 ~w ~~>o c ~
~~~~~oJl~~~'5 ji~<<:;~ I~ ~ ~
a ~5>~jOwUW : }o~~.~<< c
~g~o~OmWgSS O~~~~i.5 'ii E
a -c<< 0 ~ Emv, = 0 ~ E
~=~~..~;~a:g .5>~~-8~ ~ ~ 8
zo...."" >JI!!!O'.o=;<COC -0.,
Q.l/JujfC)m1ili> - "'tJ*.g... ~< 5 .-
S-l~ c --~ j._<<~~~~ i~ ~~~~
.~Jc~I~~~~~ mioE~~~ ~ ~lc
CD"'~~~O-E~Z ~~~Ei'J ~~=~..
~~~~;~~~~~ o~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~
~€,"_€JJ~6CD~~"'I~I"'''~ ..~ -"~I
=~m-.m-- ~mm ~ _m. 6 ~..~~
mmli€m m=~== m €.~ ~a ~~~
~~I~f~~I~G~~~€tlll~ ~j.l,i~-
~~8~~88o ~~~~~~~E~ O~~~IE~~
:~~~~~8m~ *~~~~~~i~
U~!il~~!;l18!8lii !il~",,,,16"',,,,,,"
=8;:
<1l~1B
z
o
Ci5
a::
UJ
>
Z
o
1=
a.
o
o
<(
U
a.
U
U
II)
~
z
UJ
::IE
UJ
>
o
a::
0.
i!!!]
...1<')
~o
o:~
- e( ~
C(Oo
: ~ N
~Oll)
iOwa::
X..JL5
)(::1)-
WC..J
W<(
J:U
~~
)oLL
~
Z
::I
o
o
a::
w
::::i
...I
o
o
~
<h
N
i:l
:0
ro
~
'"
C
CIl
E
'"
>
f2
c.
~
:s
-a.
ro
U
....
o
CIl
-S
1::l
Q)
.c
u
C/)
0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~
Z ..J
::I ~
0
::IE ~
e(
...
0 ~ 0
~ ~
~
Z Co/)
::I ...
0 0
N
~ )0
~
...
0 0 0
~ ~ ~
~
Z ~
::I
0 0
N
~ ~
...
0 0 0
~ ~ ~
~
Z ...
::I ...
0 0
N
::IE ~
e(
...
0 0 0
~ ~ '"
~
Z 0
::I ...
0 0
N
::IE )0
e( lL.
...
0 ~ ~
'"
~
Z t:1I
::I 0
0 0
N
::IE ~
e(
...
Z II)
UJ
0 ~
j:: 0 '" '"
Z ::> ::>
0 0 0
::I W ::> ::>
a:: ..J C .5
~ ::I ~ C
II) C 0 0
Z UJ U U
0 J:
0 0
II)
I!! 1
lrl
a ~
a:: 0
0. W
....
Z 0 '"
0 a:: 1::l ~
1= 0. C '"
ro 1::l
i:3 ..J C
i: ro
~ ..J ~
ro i:
a.
w ~ ~ ~U)
a::
c C a;
::> C ~...I
~ E 0 ~
8 "6>
~ CIl 0
a:: U a:: l-
e(
0.
- 5 N
0
w 8 8
U co co
co
...
,
UJ
U
g> i: CIl
1l ~~
I!?~~
CD.e .
~ ~~
.2.5 ~
~ ~:N -
~ ~ '5. ~
gaifj~
-g -;, '0 g>
jEI!?'C
i: g>:e :g
co<<J-g-o
~~ lUi
roCll)(-
c(I)Q)'Q
.Q 4J 0>(1)
5l''l;;E ::>
rrc2:a;
ro 0 >
-g.:::.~ ~
mco.........
-gig.9
j~"8&
~ [:as fij
~~E-5
.~~~E
5.!;; '0 m
E.ccl!?
ECllllc.
o 2 ~!
u.c-u;'"
=-"'5
~~ou
~~.!!il&
0.0 <:: 5i
z-SS.b
~.c~
E Q) ~ g>-e-
.s ..0020.
~ Ci)U)fi?g
U) ::>~)(e!
- EC-u;Q)
iBS~~>
E-o...c I!? 1Il gj
~<UElIl>-2
asOCb.2::....Q)
c'OiimJ2>
~.!!!~E~!
>.:J_g~o .
oalfjja;-::;l1lE
5j.cEc2.sl,l!l
l:UCIlroQ.ro",
o~g>5;~~
6~~~~~g
U'Q:E::>--I!?CIl
(ijCll1i'~LLrot:
~~ C Q)-o.H1 G
'" lIl::> ~ C C
~"El::c=ElIl8
.c::;m:::::JCDcu
mL-g~~~E
"C.98"Co~S
~aiCll*;~g>
Olll.sU---o
al:5o:ge;ma;
"'e!t::1::l::>Q.Q)
~ro~ro518:a
.2-~oE Q)'Q~
5C5C;:EQ)C
o~~~~"'58
Ualro,Ql!?alo
.~~~~-o-5c
'a2l1lJ!.slU).g
UQ.E~~Q)S
~~12:aS.c
~5eg-8'OS
OClQ.roCllC'"
ZU:~~.s.!!!8
M
~
.i!
.Q
19
w
i3
m
<h
o
Z
l-
ll.
~
0:>
o
"
..
o
;g
;;;
'"
~
I-
oo
o
o
'"
o
~
..
c::
"
o
e>
~
"8
~
a;
"0
c::
~
..
."
~
..
"0
..
o
I
"
.9-
..
c::
::0
(j
Concurrency Management - 6
z
o
iii
a:
~
z
o
~
o
o
<(
U
D.
U
U
gggg ~!
t- ooano
Z ~gglifg-
:;) ~I
0 ...~o.~:;;
::E ~ ~~
c(
...
t- 8* 8~ ~i
z ... 88 88 ....
:;:) c; ~i
0 N ~oo N ....
::E t ...,..: ~...
<( ... ...
...
00 00 ~~
t- 8& 0...
0
Z N 000 OOOO
:;:) c; 000 :;;~
0 N ~'" ....
::E ... . ...
>- '"
<( ... ... '"
...
0 0 8~ '" '"
t- o 0 '" '"
0 00 0
z ... 0 00 ~.~
:;:) ... 000
0 C> ~"''''
::E N "''';- ... ... .
>- ~
<( ... ...
...
88 8~ '"
t- Il) Il)
0 ~C\!.
z ~ 00 0 ... ...
:;:) C> 00 0 "''''
0 .... '" ..~
::E N "'cD N
< t ... ... ~
...
00 00 00
t- 00 0'" ~~
0 0 Il)
z gg 0 '" ~[gi
:;:) 0 Il)
0 N~ . C')
::E t .... ... ...~
c( ... ...
...
~
z '"
0 ~~
i=
I) u ~ ~o
:;:) '"
III: d; '" 0'"
t- '" ~
en 0 . 0
z '"
0 <> ~
I)
0
'"
0
en
.....
<(
0
t-
t- r;t>
I) e W
W CD --,
III -, ~~
0
III: cD.
~ IL ~~
<= 0-
CD S
>
il: li;
t- e
Z 0 1ii
W "E ~
::E 0
W I~ -;B
C)
~ -l!: .~ ~
III
D. ~"
S E ~ ~ m
ffi il~ ~ ~
CD CD 0
i ~ CD ~~ t-
LL..... en
~ Il) ;;;0
00 0
III: (; ~~
~ I) ;;; Il) 1()
en
t-
Z
W
::E
W
>
o
III:
IL
~
~~
t-O
Q:C}I
. < g:
<1)0
= ..... N
t-oen
ii~!i
~5~
WW"'"
5<3
en!Q
>lL
~
:;)
o
I)
III:
w
::::;
..J
o
I)
'"
o
rb
~
i1i
CD
:0
co
t-
m
C
CD
E
!!
e
a.
S
]i
-a
co
u
'5
CD
:;
"
CD
-'"
"
en
'"
~
,
w
(3
fI) CD"'iij,
~ -"'-
:g--;:;'g.~
~~~~e
S!E:;,o~
"if~~g
:2 C CD "C 0
> <<I ::J CD (.)
e~[6-5E
D.>O>(/)Q)
Ig~Q)"'"
; G) ~~ ~
.g.~io.Q
u.gEcm
E8~~~
,1!G)COC);;
~= f.i::J ~
~'5o~8
~~~.~o
EQ.....Cf.lc:
1)-='(,00
~g~m"'O
5i ~ ~ ~B
~ tU c: 0 (I)
(1)(1)....._
?;'ciO-gg
f~~:Q.....
a~~~-~
ee"a.e
8 o..~ f1.I Q.
E CD ~ U)
L... - -0 :::lI ::J
~~ ~ ~ ~
. 0...... >
j~-:-g:g
cuo:o~~
"i~-~~i
"li.-gJl!o'::
.g-5~eo
: en .~ ~ .;
~:E~~E
l":-=~5:;;
c 0 Q) (,j) CD
8::J.~~~~
- <<l c: to
'-"0::1(1)(1)
~~!:~~
O~.5~~
....- Em>
wQ)J!~e
bi!?~-ga.'
z,sen"s
'"
e
.;
.0
J!
OJ
U
lD
:!:
~
Q.
o
<(
:ill
u
..
o
~
'"
~
1=
8
~
~
c
~
.~
15
~
0;
~
!
-e
l
al
.l2
f
il
.9-
~
(j
Concurrency Management - 7
z
o
Cij
a:
w
>
Z
o
>=
ll.
o
~
~
tl
tl
Ul
..
Z
w
:l!
w
>
o
II:
...
!
~E
. ~~
<ui<l
t:::5",
iiiwa:
%s:i
::ifil~
~~
tIJ!Q
~"-
z
::>
o
U
II:
w
::::;
~
o
U
'"
o
~
.,:,
;;
"
:0
"
l-
e
;:
"
~
>
e
"
.E
l!
.~
tl
'5
"
:;
."
"
i3
(J)
.. g'~'~'i~:;J:;~
~ .t~~~_~~~
o ........ .....
:II 0
c( ..
...
..
z
::>
o
:l!
c(
...
o ~ o~ ~ 8 ~ ~
~ g g~~S?
~ ~ ~~
..
"
"
"-
"
"
.E
:
"-
'E :
" "
E i c
~ ~:: 8
B~~~cg ~
eQ)cQ. -.
E04lOO'jil.Ow'!!:l
~ : ~ ~ "e li i"; ~
ct)oc::c;~.s.s'2~
~:~:~:r:~~~
~i -.:<;'''.'''.'~&l
. '" c1l_ """ <( .
~~~~~~ffi~~
o
....
w
<3
,.,
.~i..c: g
~j ~~
~1l.5g
~ ~.~ 8
~j ~ ~
5..! ~~
-;~.2~
~Ji:
+=>.,'0_
.==">2
l'~ K~
~.~ ~ ~
--:::JO
-0 lD t>> c:
CD ..0 iL 0
~~,;~
~~~:
~..Q : &0
~E':: 8
u:~gll
~~BK
ii~~
'" ~ iil ~
~ ~~ ~
E I'Cl CD lD
~~! ~
~ ~~ ~
it~~~
c 5 CD CP
~tl"'~
il"~,,,
8:5 ~ :G
~~~~
~8.~~
igd
(0 !! i ~
j;~~
8:ii~.5
~~~~
~ a~ S-
~~ ~o
5 ~ 5~
~~~~
8~~:
..3~.sE
5~~~S
zcn~~!
'"
~
I
!II
u
;
~
~
8
~
00
~
~
I
~
i
j
.
J
~
~
I
I
l5
&
!
.:;
Concurrency Management - 8
!Z
::>
o
~
...
8fljlO~888
~ ~ ~~~~I
00 01/)(7)
~~ ~~O>
8 Ol~~ g 8 g
!;::g ~~~
is 00 C:O!~CJ)
:l! ~i=:I ~~
c( ...
..
..
z
::>
o
:Ii
c(
..
~~ggg8g
o 0$2'000
ti go:$~,i
~ ;;-"-....",
..
z
::>
o
:Ii
c(
...
~~~O~8U_
Gte ooo~
00 enOl-
l': ~..,Iti~
>
...
z l3
o l-
t: ~~~
g w ~~oo
a:= ..J ' . 00
.... ~ ....('I')NN
~ ~ ~~
U ~
..
U
w
..,
o-
Il:
... "
'"
-g
,,-
~~
2e
-,,-
~.5i ~
8f~i~e
L~':.!!!E5ll.
-ii .sIc B . 5
~ ~I~ ~ U ~
oo~11G>>~
~~.s~.t~11
Ol,Q~eiCl.-
~~~~1!~~
I~~~~~i~
a..Q.Q..Q..5ECl
r-....t-t:-.-8E
~~~~~ali
(,)W(,)(..))(lIljD
ZZZ(I)WtX:O
lli
s:;
5
.~~;;;o
ii~ge~
............
z
o
Cii
II:
W
>
Z
o
ii:
o
o
<
o
ll.
o
o
0 8g8 ~
... g 000
z <l~ :!~~ ~:
::::I
0 ...;1 co......
~ ~ li:i~ ..
...
0 ~~ ~
...
I- -
Z ...
::::I -
0 0 0 i
N
::E ~
<
...
00
... ....
Z N
::::I -
0 0
N
:IE >-
< IL
...
00
I- ...
Z -
::::I -
0 0
N
::E >-
< IL
...
0 ~g~ 0
I- ... 0
Z ~ 0
::::I N N
0 0 :;: :;:
N
::E ~ :i :i
<
...
0 0 ~~g
I- 0 ~
Z ",C?
::l 010 ... .,;
0 oeo ~ '"
N'" 0
::E >-... ~ ~
< IL
...
In
Z W
0 I-
i= 0'"
U z8 "'a..,
::::I w'"
0:: .... , 0__
000
I- ::::I eo "'''''''
In CO
Z Wo
0 :z:'"
U U
In
'"
o/l
-
'"
In 3l ~~~
wm
....s::;
Oil. ~~:3
z'
..,
<
.!!!
Gi
0
c c c c~
.2 .2.2 i~
0 00
... 2 .E.E ~~
U"lij '" '"
We c c
..., 0 ,'38 P
00
0::= QiQi ~
l1. CD po..
0 0
;: -=iE ~~
CO -g -g-g
?- m m '" ~
U 1-:: -' -'
w ia
(3 ~ c "
:::l :::l
0:: 0 o 0
l1. 0 00
W
I-
U>
~ .0 al~~
!!lID
C ul- I-
::;
0
U>
~
z
w
::E
~
0::
0..
~
......,
<-
t:0
l1.~
:r: .c g
<Uo
: u.. N
I-O(/)
~~~
:Z:::::I~
~~~
:Z:o
U(/)
In_
~IL
Z
::l
o
U
Ix:
w
::;
....
o
U
CD
o
cD
~
iIi
Cll
:c
'"
I-
U)
-;:
Cll
E
Cll
>
E
0-
~
S
.is..
l'II
o
'0
Q)
:;
"0
CD
.s::;
o
en
00
00
00
.....tti(")
<"''''
I-~~
o~~
o
N
IL
Ol
C 0
.~ &. ~
{g=8~CDE
." ill ~ E
~~D>.2~cD
~o~~g;:
M ~ ~g ~ ~
C:-:6~~ 8;
~di~5~;:
c1) >:E 0 CD u..
~~:;: == ~ E
C-"'~~E
m::!:.oIL.!'!_
::!::;:o~~c
~1)~?;1i~
s:~.!~~~
.r;.!!Q)-lOc:
lE~~g.~
-m--u-
~a,8-81i~
d~g5&.~
c(Do__CI)C:
~~~~~.~
~~~8~~
~"fiiE~.~o
t>>U)~ CI) c:
~.~tiu).~.9
~.~~~ ~-a
C.U5C)>~
02o.5;.!!! C
~~'2g~~
5i8~==~'E
a:B8'g~~
===J!......g
s!5!5~~:
cjfii5~m
~~~<2~~
&~ 5~'5~
iE ~88~.9
N
w
U
i ~~-g,g
"Ccm:J
'>~Ee.g
~i3~;'S
Q.c:aI._.o
e8 ffi ~ ~
&C1)o~8
iL ~ ~ ~u
.0 :s 0 Q)
~~5l:g'~
~_ CD" t/)
U)g2~~
c~~o.~
~ as e m cD
&~ 2 5 ~
~~.~~~
~~i-ti~
~[~.~~
~.5:€~~
:::lS~-E
g'a.~ g~
8~'~'~:
~O$~tu
~~ ~ 5 ~ .
6"O.m U) CD E
.!~gg:~"*
mOCO&::>>.
"Oen.E~oU)
~.!t2 CD Q) a~
8-:: ~ -gE ~
"Oo~_sl::
:~E.~Q.5
.:g~"5i<'38
~c:..D"'C
-;:"'ECD'OE
55.!!~~Q)
u.E~~-6-;
(j;a)~~~g
=e?C:::::JU-
o-C CD O(1)m
u~~~~.!!
"ascn::J-.a
~~~5iO!
~,g~~!.~8
..,
~
..
~
.Q
.!!
w
u
:l:
o
z
g;
<
.,
o
~
~
;0
~
;::
:g
~
~
!
:>
o
E!'
.J!
i
I
..
.6
Iii
~
~
1
J
!
..
~
i.i
Concurrency Management - 9
Z
o
ii)
a:
w
>
Z
o
;::
c..
o
~
u
c..
U
U
tI)
....
z
w
::E
w
>
o
0::
ll.
1!!
~~
....0
ii:~
;..;~g
;;. ~N
....OW
~~~
~g~
WW..J
:J:~
~!!l
~u.
z
~
o
o
0::
W
::::;
..J
o
o
'"
o
'f:-
~
..
"
:is
"
....
"
C
"
E
"
1\
a
E
S
.5.
'"
o
o
"
:;
."
"
.J::
"
tI)
&8.igg gg 0
.... - &
~~g;e~~ 00 0
z '" M
::I C~CCl_N..~~ N
0 t-~O(\f.....M '0 ,.:
~ O~N '" '"
....
...
~oooo &1im
.... 8888
z ~ ggg~ ~~
::I
0 N O>ONO ;; 5t -:'~
::E ~ "'N"'~
0( ...... N
...
~8888 8888
!z 0000 00 0
~ ~11l11li8 00 - ci
::I ::38 ~
i C'lII 6:;~,.... ..... CD..- .
0( ~;; .. ... ~
...
00000 00 0
0000
.... 88888 0000
z ~~gg~~ ~~~~
~
0 Npo... "'lI'......NIt> .....u:i a6
::E ~Z?~ 0;;
0(
...
8~~8lil 8888
0000
.... o 0 lnoc:5o
z 012 16 :om~~
::I ;fD ~ 1::?I::1P1l ~
0 Ni::1
~ ~
...
~~~gO 0000
8888
.... Ot~ ~ an 00 c:i
Z an,-NO
::I g", :;: N..,. 0 co
0 .;~~ N
::E t~ ... ;;;
0(
...
z tI)
W
0 ....
f:: ~"'''' '"
z~~~ eO
0 000
::I WNNN -N
0:: ....I ' I I 0
.... ::;)c:o........... ..-
tI) fiJ8oC;O(;
Z %NNN N
0
0 0
tI)
.... W
0 Q; ..J
W .J:: g
a 5
0:: e ....
ll. 0 tJ ....
""
.l!lJ!l ~ .. U
e e ~'12 W
" " " a
" E E oc..
e ~~ ' e 0:
'" CD .Q c..
:; e E ts'i 0:
~Ig E ~ '" .f!) := w
., e.o ~
.. ",Cl~_Cl
U Q.~~~
OJ g~u.o~
0 !~ ; ~ ~ ; jO:"l;j
'" ..""
lL E I~ U 0: :2 &cJ!l~
'" 8~!l:g;n
OJ e ~ 5i I
..
~ u..u....b:::;1L .2 '" E a:
Q:a:"~a: ~ ~ 1:: W
:=:= "':= - :=
... uo1!lo
.. )( II) G) W
~ ZZOtnZ WO:::O (I)
10 .... ~'"
'" :~:5~f5g
~ u~~l-g~
W ............ ......,....
..
ggg~lil~ggg
....000 000
<:g,,~ ~~c;;
~~~.. a.o~
N
N
,
W
13
,- -
g~~~lillilggg
"'o,;{ 000
l';l::! '" ~g g
(') <<5....."':
1M ... :;:
,- -
8ag~~~~gg
~11l 0 000
010 ~ 8a;~
N (f') <0..... ~
1M ... ~
,- .
gii1g~lillilg8g
o 0 oosi
oO!2 '" "',..
&. "ICt....... ..,. ,....
I2f 10 .0
I"" ;;;
.- .
g~g~~lilggg
og al al!E~
2 "'. ~ "'~ q
2: 1::1 ;;
,- .
~88~~~888
00 000
00 00 ci
...'" ~N 0
(")M .oco
~ ~1Zi ~
...
.- -
:; gUJ
.e .!!2 ~
~ ~ @ ~
:5~i!
~ E '" 0
tE E~
l; E ~ ~
- Q) '-.-
~ ~~ z
'g ~.~ ;
~~~E
~ ~~ ~
~i:: ~
E:;'~~
~~ii
~:, !:a .
~g~~~
EUeo~
&CDG)(DCI}
~=~~~
CD 0 C CD C"
~'t:Gs"6e
~[~cn B
~ g li ~ 8
B~50E
c: as lD ~ Q)
UOU)2--
c 5-" '"
i E It) ~ ~
>'~!~tt1
bee-",
.!a.~.!!:;
t'Oj;e:ii
I~J ~ 8
il!~.eg
~~~~~
f~€.~iJ
::s ~ J: o..!!
8a5~!~
~~J~g
8'O>..e
.. ~i~ ~
W;o:::ON~
O~~=~
Z..",!>
~
~
~
~
~
~
.m
I
'Ii
1!
.l1
.~
~
..
j
I
f>
~
U
...
~
:
"
J!l
w
(3
~
~
i5
'"
8
~
II>
Q)
'"
u.
n
..
~
e
-= ~i
(f. .2 ~
c ~~
I~o" II> l! ~;;,
'i) ~ ii~5
> ~ ,S'68
~ .. "tJ~<(
E a:: 5,-~
CD fI) CI:l 4t) u. ii .~
I-;)-C 2:'0 :a a;
1J)~m5.~au2
4)<D~~~~SlD<i.
mo,,~"'~~ii""
i~~~a:~~a:1-
Ui=:~:C-!Elsw
".-1'1.-_0:;"::1
~~O!'?':'I~~
!!::'oc..;,~g~~~
(l)ma:mCl)JCI)O::cr
Concurrency Management - 10
EXHIBIT "A"
COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
COST AND REVENUE SUMMARY TABLE
FISCAL YEARS 2009-2013
The table below ilemlzes the Iypes of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The "Ravenue Amounl" column conlelns the 5- Year amount of facility
revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses versus revenues for each type of public facility. All daflcila are accumulated as a sublotal. The
subtotal daficit is the sourea of additional revenue utilized by Collier Counly to fund the deficit In orde, to maintain the levels of service standards as
referenced in the Capitaj Improvement Element
Projads
ROAD PROJECTS
Revenue Sources
Ex.--.,.
Revenue
Amounl
TOClII
Revenues: IF - Impact Fees I COA Revenue
GA - Gas Tax Revenue
GR - Grants I Reimbursements
CF - Cany Forwan:!
TR - Transfers
GF - General Fund
DC - Devek)per Contribution Agreements I Advanced Reimbursements
lOC - Short Term loan Commercial Paper
RR - Revenue Reserve
$147,000,000
$104,588,000
$32.757,000
$34,552,000
$0
$119,509.000
$0
$50,000,000
-$3,068.000
$485,338,000
less Expenditures: $485,338,000
Balance
$485.338.000
$0
POTABLE WATER PROJECTS
Revenues:
WIF - Water System Development Feesllmpact Fees
81 - Series 2006 Bonds
RR - Operating ReseN8 Revenues
B3 - Series 2010 Bonds
LOG - Commercial Paper 1
SRF5 - SRF loan 5
SRF6 - SRF loan 6
W CA - Water Capital Account
REV - Rate Revenue
$19,120,000
$0
$550,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$21,520,000
$4,650,000 $45,340,000
$45,840,000 $45,840,000
Balance $0
$45,500,000
$5,340,000
$420,000
$0
$0
$0
$30,230,000
$5,820,000 $87,310,000
$87,310,000 $87,310,000
Balance $0
$10,923,000 $10,923,000
$10,923,000 $10,923,000
Balance $0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0 $0
Balance $0
$10,200,000
$0
$0
$38,769,680 $48,969,680
$48,969,680 $48,969,680
Balance $0
TOTAL REVENUE
$678,380,1180 SOURCES $678 380 6
Less Expenditures:
SEWER - WASTEWATER PROJECTS
Revenues;
SIF - Wastawaler System Development Feesllmpact Fees
B1 - Series 2006 Bonds
RR - Operating Reserve Revenues
B3 - Series 2010 Bonds
SRF - State RevoMng Fund loans
lOG - Commercial Paper, Additional Senior Lien
SCA - Wastewater Capital Accounl, Transfers
REV - Rate Revenue
Less Expenditures:
SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
Revenues:
l TF - landfill Tipping Fe..
less Expenditures:
PARK & RECREAllON PROJECTS
Revenues:
IF - Impact Fees
GR - Grants J Reimbursements
GF - General Fund
less expenditures:
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
Revenues:
GR - Grants I Reimbursements
CF - Cany Forward
RR - Operating Reserve Revenues
GF - General Fund
Less Expenditures:
TOTAL PROJECTS
C:llnelpublwwwmol\uploeds\marciakendal@<xll__.noIo2OOI0105T112951118DocO....DPTNoa.aClE_<--13)
CIE-23
Concurrency Management - 11
z
0
~
0
..
0
0
111
~
.... ~i
i . ~
....
1L u
..
i
.... ..
Z
::l 2
i
.... N
~ i
I t
..
.. ....
... z
i5 ::l 2
0
lE t t
~ ..
II:
II. ~
1I
~" ~ 08
toR i::
. ~~ i ;; '"
:c~g .... ;;
...
1:0<1)
I!..a:
"'.....i:)
:.1&.... ~
~... ..
..~ ~ :l E
r;U. ....
0
a: a:
::l ::l ..
8 lI: .....
...
lI: ..
!II z
... 8 ~
...
0
0
. ~ ~
~ ~
:2
~.
!-
J
..
~
f
l-
f
.Iii
:!
....
13
15
i
Concurrency Management - 12
"":.
~
11
2p
.n
" u
. "
j E
sg
~ II
ij
'"
"l!
i~
.z.fool
Ep
~ u 0
S ~ I
~ '" .
~ . a.
~~8
.E..!"
1l:!21
,a;,A
";.si
0':::,,2
. .-
-=""0 0
....-
s"'C
oP
~ . ~
~..x
".0.
-0;;
~ii
... ...
:..~ t
! E.
oE[
~ i.s
Il a._
_ 0
19B
za....
I
-;
m
j
l
~
j
!
I
f
I
!.'-
.
~-fi
l~-sl
:si.;~
ifi.g
:2~>_
~ ~.e.i
a"... i!
. r! . g
~ait
~8:f
~~~a
lo!'~
1:i~~
hili!
Fi;~
i:to
~ e t ..
,,~...~
~ pi
u ~.;, "
a a.." .
~~!;
flit
!'l;:Jf
..J!! ill e
""0 :=. - CL
~"'O oJ! E e
~.!~!~
"1~h.i-
1=!!"1;
~o~ -: ~
~1~~~
... '"g ~ Is
iji~i
.. t E_ ..
"'g~...~~g
L >- IP-
..cn_..
:!!
II!
o
~
~
i
~
!
i
~
o
i
~
u
i
~
I
!
I
j
j
l
I
~
:I
"
'"
"
i
OS
I
i
i
1
..
z
o
(ij
a:
w
>
z
o
f:;
!l.
g
<
o
o
IX)
~
w
::Ii
w
>
~
Q.
!!!!!
;;I.~
~o
lL~
:c~o
. u.. '"
~O(/J
~~~
:I:;:)w
xQ>
wW-1
:I:(S
g~
>LL
~
;:)
o
o
a:
w
:J
~
o
o
UJ
c:
<D
E
"0
c:
.,
.?
0>
8
'"
U5
<D
i
I--
UJ
C
II>
E
CI>
>
o
0..
S
]!
-a.
III
o
"0
<D
:;
"0
II>
~
o
l/}
!E ~ ~ ~
;:) ;;I.
i ~
0
41( ~
..
~ ~ ~
~ .
;:) 0
0 N
~ i::
..
0 1i ~
...
~ C'I
:l ....
0 0
N
~ it
..
1i ~ ~
~ ~
;:) 0
0 N
::Ii it
41(
..
0 0 ~
~ ...
~ ....
;:) c;
0 N
~ it
..
~ 0 ~
V}
!z ~
:l 0
0 N
~ >-
...
..
Ul
Z W
0 ~
i= 0 '" '"
z => =>
0 0 0
;:) w => =>
a: ~ .!: c:
~ ;:) c: ~
~ Q 0 8
w 0
0 %
0 0
Ul
~ ~
...
0 ~
a:
Q.
Ul I--
W
E u ~
w
~ ...
0 0 '"
c a: "0
11. c: '"
II.. III "0 l/}
Z -1 c: -'
"'" ~ <
0 Qj I-
~ ~ ~ ~5
III
w 11.
a: c: 01
0 => 5 I~
w E
a: E i'
Q 0
~ 0 a: !l.
Ul
lal! - ~ '"
a: w ~
41(
Q. 0 co co
...j
~
0
~
0 .~2
~
.,
~
>-
IL.
2 ~2
CO)
~ I
~1:~2 2
5 t;.:
~ I.'
IL. ~
_2120
~ I
~212
E .~
'" ;~
~ it
'~
;~~
'..~~.
~;i~
'~
,7~
I
.~
I
Gli" .
::J':,~
c:r
OIl'
>.1;-
II>
a:
~,
Of "0-1
c: <
Lf~
~g
:! ~
~a5
,. >
.IL. W
!:!: C) a:
t:::
w
13
g-.:.I: CD
-iilZ
.8 Q.~
l!~1--
lIl.2 ui
~g.-g
:3~~
:2~~
lB"Q~8
,::;fBU&
"00.'0 C
C c Gl-
~ .f!> 5 :g
~lB~~
.~C"Q
0-0<01:
>< a. III
ii4DX=
8 ~ ~o
.CD'; .5 ~
~lB~~
~=_5~
lIl!l_-
-g16gB
S~"8$
"'" "'::l ~
-c.4I'm
tf~:"6
~~~~
J- 0 (Ij
E~ C l!!
f:g>lIl~
i5 e g>~
~=~~
~jo~
W III . '"
1--="'0
o13-gc:
Z.!jgg
..
..
~
~
6
..
J!
j
w
U
'"
><
'"
z
t
o
0(
o
o
<Xl
~
'"
e
..
::t
l')
B
o
CD
ru
u
<'>
~
~
Ii.
Ie
i
l
..
~
o
'"
o
o
\l
<:
"
E
-g
..
E
<
c:
OJ
a::
~
~
~
Q.
::t
Cl
C!l
z
Z
z
:5
Q.
Q.
::;
o
J
i
i
o
y
(oj
~-
fl g'~
E Gl5E~
.!! .ofi=~
g!, u;CI>-~;;l
(/) ::S=,(I)~
c_Em~~
~!B ~~:g
&"'E<Do2
",OIll2:_Gl
c:--iii"2>
III ~ !l!.Ei)l!!
::!:_UlGl__
>--5 - ~ > 0
O<DltUeCDE
5.i.cEcQ.~GJ
~~&~~~i
(.)flJQSO:J;::0
5:S lii 8.2'~ ~
~O:q~,,:!?Cii
GI~(;CI)i:~
~;; lii !g ~ - '"
6"0 l:: c]jlii 8
!iG~'-~u
QS'-c:~o>E
"058-c-=e:;
<1)- Q)cna.-
a. -1Il-- E CD
o3!sl'SCI>-8
~:5oi~~a;
lll~t::"O~i.l!!
~",!.lIlCDO~
~~oE~o~
50C:~~.9!8
O-t>.!!!CD;:,o
uiCi.o....,o_
G5:g!!-="i~ g
~l;i.l!!B~.g
o ls. ~ ~i ~ -
w~:>~"O=.5
t-:;~C:Q)o.!9
O.2'~~=lii~
ZIL._-=""_o
Concurrency Management _ 13
~
Ii)
II:
W
>
~
&
o
<(
o
o
CD
Ul
...
Z
III
:E
~
o
II:
~
~~
I:~
. ~ ~
CUo
. ... '"
1:0(1)
1D1IIlX:
%...~
)(:;)>
Illfil;J
:Co
~!Q
>lL.
...
Z
:;)
o
U
II:
III
::;
....
o
o
..
E
~
~
~
CD
0
<:>
(\/ ~
..
.. ~
2i
.. a
...
.l! f
c
~ ...
.. z
~ ...
:I!
~ III
C1
c
!i ~
Ci
.. :Ii
0 II:
'l5
.. i
:;
-0
..
"fi
00
UI
!i: 8~ 81~ ~ 8 ~~ ~
4llj~88~~~~g
:;) - It) _ C\I""""CID
0 IP - - ":'e~ ......~
:E ... ~...... ...
Of
..
... ~g~8~~~~~
z :!:8~ 8""g"""
:;)
0 2M oo:.~I~I!;~
:I ~ ~ el;; :0
4(
...
... ~~I~~~~~~~
~ ::? 8 r::: ~ <'>gt\i
0 ~IM - I~ Ie "l
:I ~ ~ to
C
...
8o~o~goog
... 8 ... og~,,"
z ~8;e o;~!3~
:;)
0 ~;; ~ !S~;;~
~
...
!E 8 8r~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ R
:;) -go 0"'''':'':
0 i-~ ~it::~
:Ii ~ -, ~ ...:; ~
4(
...
8g8~ogg08
~ 80CD8
oo_~ 0<'><'>8=
:;) -00 ~ "" ..~ -
i 2 M "! o CD CII
it Zl;; -.... <'>
c ... OJ;
...
z ~
o l-
t ~~50 eo!!:
:;:) III'" cs - 0
~ S;:!6:!v
~ ffi~o- ~
o:c -
o 0
Ul
e
E
8
5i
~
.9
~
o!l E
g G
~ ~
..."2' ~
~~ IS ~
~ ~ ~ Ii
Q.~ ~~l
I~ ~ ! g
II: ~ ~ '"
c ~ I a j
f_ ls.!:
l~lJjf~ ~!
..5 ~.. :;:) E ~
<1.-...-0 ..~~
E~.jlj~~
I, ~ ~ g BilLE
.t3C!l.! !!lls~
~
<(
.....
~
,..1-
gfrl
.....,
"'0
~II:
cQ.
~
ffi
~
4(
~
::t
a::
w
.....
<(
~
~
~
.~--M!Q("J
!!!o~i<s;:
oY:;""u;u;."
.2'
:;:)
ClO
w
(3
l
.-
~
I
"'
G
'"
'"
'"
Z
0-
Il.
o
...
"
"
as
~
CoO em
~ s-
IE,;!g-
.e~~o~
~&li~6
:2~..il8
K!~~E
enoCD .
l!C~"'-
:I~CP=ga
...-~-o
u:: g E ~c
e8sSs
! ~ ~ g~
J;=.cao~
_oos8
~&~~g
~ggi~
jl!~"'~
~: i.es
~i~~~
~ ~ J KI
~~i ~!
l~ ;~;
b 0._ >
~~:i=
CIIon~e
-o~j=~
Sils'::l!
f.!~go
"~!i.!!:
2~~~~
;::.-Ci!-
cO::~1
8:J t~! ~
-1OC'''lI
~~~i~
8:?S~!t
~.a:i~.
w"':!5S>E
t-.-\lE!~
~~~-!l~
1!
J
g
"
Ie
o
"I
~
Ii.
CD
"-
~
~
,.
"
"-
!
I
c
...
"-
E
~
~
"-
~
fi
z
z
:s
Q.
..
::E
,
c;
Concurrency Management _ 14
!E ~ ~~ ~~.~~ ~
~ :> oo- co ~
0 ,.-
'" ~ ~ '"
a:
UJ .. U
:>
15 :i:ilI ~~~
;::
~ ...
~ .. ~~~~
<:> i
0(
0 ::I it o."':(jl)
g 0(
..
... lali nWI
z ..
~ ii CD CD
::I >- Q CD_ ~
0( ...
..
... ~O~ o ! ~J!I
z =~ ~lil ! .
:>
0 goo ~;
~ it
..
... g~:i:~~gg
g ig I~!!i
~ t: I; tit
..
CD
!i
w
::I
w
>
o
CII:
...
i!
~~
zr'l'
c~~
. lL '"
lii~~
%...~
~B...
~~
(/)-
/:lL
z
:>
8
a:
UI
~
o
8888~8.mil
~ ~ In ~ i ~Itii Il!
~ :~,.:~~ a""~
..
(/)
~ ~
;:: z
~ 1&1 00
~ ~ 2~
! ~
o ~
..
c
..
E
l!
~
8
'"
:
~
...
l!I
~
~
"
E
~
";.
l)
"
.JI
~
'"
ell
t)
w
il~
...Ig
"E
..
c :;;
.2 ~
~ i 0
15'E! .#
81 -ll
u ~2
CI.f ~ u a:
Ill,! ~ .;, 3
~ ~o .11
a:::e ct~.
~ ~I! i ~I~I
-!i~ ~ li"l<3li'l
:l!~.n~r.i!
~ ~ g, .~~ i!
~~ tle11l!
:z: Z 0 a:1.J!
-~MC;;
!!!8C!8
0--0
.........
~
~
I
tl.
1i
"
.. is!
;S.a>-
".Il ~ l!
~~&~
- ...Ill!
~j~8
.hi.~
.. "j.2 ~
i.!U
l!~:!l..
fJ!.~
15!!Il-
iZ~8
:!l_lLg
H"i~
~i'b
~ji~
!:. u
~<O-;i
-E2e
!:.~il"
en._!
i:! I!
e"i'"
&:1 ~ >
.. ~_ II
~..H
5->
gg~!
~8"O~
~.!51
8--e
-~e:
H~$
j:~~
.-.-
i:~fti
e-i~e
i ~"" g-
;eii
-;'~~'B.
3=~~
8~:S"
iiS-~.;
8~n
..,,!cll e
~jil!~
zcl!!1i !-
~
.
*
f
~
~
z
IL
~
~
<>
i
;J
8
!II
I!!
"
t
l;l
~
~
I
!
I
i
t
e
o
..
'"
"
i
I
:l
..
!
i
<;
Concurrency Management - 15
t5
~
III
>
~
i=
0-
o
o
<
o
l6
I- ~~~
z ~~ 00
~ ~~
i 1-.
~~ ~~
..
~i~
I-
z .
~ Ci
i ...
c ~
..
I- :! ~'1~
!
i ~ i~
..
I- ~~a
z ...
~ i
0
~ ~
..
o~o
I- .. ..
Z ...
~ i
0
~ >-
II.
..
0 ~~
I- 8
z ~o 0
~ g~ ~
0
~ ~~ (')
..
...
z I/)
w
0 I-
i= i
0
~ wO(,)
a:: :sg~
l-
I/) Q
Z III
0 :t:
U U
I/)
0.... ~<I)
11I<
b'; = ...J
~<
zO g
t>
III
..,
0
a:
Q.
<I)
W
I/) i=
I- ::;
0 C~ (3
III .2 <
.., I-~g~
0
a: U_J:> <
Q. a g~ ~
I/)
w
i= a: Or;;; n.
IL'i",!2
::; op Q
U ;;: j!:!
~ '6 <I)
.... ~~ ~
~ I~ fg
0
n.
ltl 130
0 o <I)
W
?-
ft)
~ ..
wO~
0 u~i=
::;
0
Ul
~
z
w
::l!!
III
>
o
a::
A.
!
~5
-N
Q.c,
:.:~c;
. L&. N
1:;0<1)
1D1lla:
-....<
:1::;)11I
>Co>
IIIw....
:1:<
00
Ul!2
~IL
z
:;)
o
U
a::
w
::;
....
o
o
s
c:
~
..,
c:
'"
E
<
...
o
o
'"
..
'"
~
'"
E
'"
E
'"
i;
a.
.5
S
~
nI
o
"0
'"
"3
..,
'"
.c
<>
en
0
~~ ~
W
...J~~ (3
< co
brD<O
~
:!
0
'"
>-
u.
(')&~
-00
0__
"'''t''t
>M(')
IL'"
0
...
'"
C;
...
>
u.
aa
i II
'"
~
> ;;
u.
.
.
~~ J
w
000 0
~ ~~. ..
~
fL~~ z
Ii:
0
<
()
..2 Q).c- hl
i ~ ",8 ~
~15 ~ ~i~~ I
...! go li.~liJ!ii
:20." ~ ;
.20"'::1 . c:"'s
ILl ~1!! '" tIS;. ~
o_c>- &8 0 ~ 8
~~~~ u: ~;-11 (l
-~ a-o '"
-o~ ! 0 ",-g li. a
..: 1! ~
i_Sat ~i ~P;! i
E ... Y: 5 (J) Q,. c: ~ ... ~
&~~,:;: cg~li.~
l! u. ;: "i ~",~lll'" ~
n1:E 1;'1L c
&Cija.2 .II
~;:ls~ i
* 1;'; ;: l!~~iL'" Q.
~~~ai! .
.. -- ~
;: .., ~~ i- ~CD NO 0
-5 i l!!...J! 2~~'is ..
!.e;l!.. ~ ~.i ~ as ~
<"8~<> i-",oE '"
ga. ~5J 'iiJSC~ i
O=--jf 0 E
:;:;-"gc:S8. og.:.!! ..,
C:CG.Q_co ~O.!~.G i
~jilll'5 ~:o~a~ . .l
. ,,<>.E"g '",.!! E i
~'CI)(OIlS ~i~!:~! iL
"'1!.!O", "
E~f6~~ . &:;c>>- ~
~.c;::~K~
iii~.ii~ !~.8l!Eg ...
m .g ~J! CG o!_~-... <
." ~ - to 0
~~8 .i~ 01_ ~:!" ~
::10 -<>'2 '"
""'l!! ID ..c:~:;i~o '"
'Bo4&-.:s: .0.., 0
t"2~loE z
~i81~ 3!
o..~_~!! ~
l-__.!!!..... 0~(J)~-gg> ~
.9~~tJ!i :1-:'1:3'5.2 ~
~.!!!~08 ~: ~ ~CI) : I
~u:-~<2~ ..S&!!:a
":E3~.3 ~I!:l!~o~ c
~ ~8 8 ~ ~ l;f ! j g i
Go
~
Ci
Concurrency Management - 16
z
Q
Ul
a:
w
>
z
Q
Ii:
~
o
g
II)
!i:
!i!
~
o
E
A-
II
~:!
t:!il
. ~ S!
~~!il
lii~~
:f5;:l
li1fi1~
:z:~
~~
>1.1.
~
8
()
E
III
:;
....
o
()
i
E
"2
~
-<
8
'"
..
"'
!
..
1:
..
e
~
""
.&
:!l
i
o
15
..
"!l
1
<ll
R ~ ~ ~ ~ I.~I~
i 4t g ~ i ~ i ~1!1~
o I-~'" -filS!! t:;.. 13
! I- ...~... ~
..
I- il~ ~~~~~
z... 5!OSj! Ji?
I ~ I:~: -~
..
!i: ~~~~~~~~
::I i ~ ~ijl~~
i > Ii IQj ~ ~ ;;; i
C II. I'"
..
i~~~~~~~
~i = ~~~~~;~
a :::!"'oti~;;;;;;
c it I'" I;;; -. ..
..
R~~~~I~~
!i: ::I~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~!~
6 il~l~ ~~~
:E)o ...
c ..
..
I~ i @ ~ @ ~ ~ ~
~ i~ !i~!~i~
i Ji ;;;... a
c II.
..
z fa
~ !~~15
~I-a: 5~'':' 2
a -0
!I:! !il
() U
II)
'"
t-
t>
;3
lE
2
III
~
'"
t-
Z
1M
2
a
a:
t-
Ilt
III
t-
;
I:!!
'"
;
I~
a
a:
A-
'"
~
o
l-
t-
o
w
! ~
~ 0.
C ::.
i -lie ~
! .. 50. w
! J . i ;
.'2,~; ~:g ~
"'~-a:n.l!!j w
~~"i~"i~.~ f!
- "ioj...oa:
a:"a:c1i1:!!
olD:e~c~i~
ll:l1:~ci5-il!l.e~
~~i~~.ii~
ZZUlO~a:~;::
-~j~
~"''''~
.........
ii~~~
~ii
- 13
;;;
(;j
II!
o
ii~~ ~
~g~
i~:i
~~~~ii~~~
::~ ~ ~i~
lil-'" ~:gt
it ... ... ...
~i~i i~~~
o ~ lil ~~ ~
~;;; ~ .lli~a
i
~
~
I
..
"'
"'
1.1.
!i ~.
S .!f=,
i.2:~5
~-"i!
s[~ i"l)
5~1
..,i-
.2iH
~-lli
I~j!i
""p..
1!~1
LL-fDe
~i~t
1$!1.
i ~ >~ i
i~l!!'a~
f~11 i
::'-C"'05t:
g!.~!I! ~
l!!~.=8
~l!!l5~E
~;~.!!.!!
1i5i~~r
.e.~_
","';!s.
b~.,,",
.! CI.>.iS
.'& l!? l!~
~ljU
f~Il!~
!~.~~
~~i' I ~
5' _.c;;
o l5!8
~ "l~i
=~_1.L
8"l)~.K
-. ~ .III"
~::: ~ a
~I~ !
c
.
0:
!
~
<!i
~
21
z
~
A.
~
8
t
~
ij
'"
u
~
N
~
g
c
1!
~
I
II
i
51
i
1.
!
~
i
j
Concurrency Management - 17
EXtI8IT "A"
COWER COlMTY 8CHEDUL.E OF CAPITAL ...AOVEllENTS
COST AND RE\IElIIJE Sl.WIIARY TABLE
FISCAL YEARS 201().2014
Tbe '** beIaw 1loIniua.... lype& oIlUllic ""'1IIiIe .nd", __ oI_ue. "IM"R8v..... Amount' <oIumn _.. ... S-Y_ amount oIl8c:il1tV
-- "1M right column ic. calculation a/ _ v...... rev_lor aach.,.,. 01 po.tIlic 18ciI1ly. A11_ _ ~ _ . ~ "1M
- - la.... """"'" of addiIIonaJ _enue ulIlIz8d ~ Coller CowlIy 10 fund... doficit In _10 maln1ain... lMtelo of H1Vice _ ..
~ in... CapilaIIn1>rav_ Element
ProJeeta ,..... Sou.....
ARTERIAl. MO COll.ECTOR ROAD PRo.JECTS
e-......
.....
Amount
T_
Rev_: IF - ~ F_, COA Revenue
GA. Gee Tox Revenue
GR - G..u' RaImbu_nls
CF - Carly Foiwarll
TA - Tronofara
GF - GanoraI Fund
DC - DaveIoper Conlrllution A__, Adv.nced ~1IIlI
IN - InlWaat Revenue
LOC - SI'<>tl Term I..oon Commarcial P_
AA - Rev&null A8calVe
$87.500.000
S8U98.ooo
$54.841,000
S27.t189.ooo
SO
$73.495.000
15.250.000
S10.880.ooo
SO
." .962,000
$324,371,000
L... &pen......: $318.457.000
Balance
13,..451.000
SS,814,_
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS
Reven.....: WIF . Wator SysI8m Oevaloptrwll _Impact Fa... S9.660.ooo
B 1 - Serie& 200Il Bonda SO
RR - Opar.oting RMelVe _en_ 14,140.000
B3 - Series 2010 Bonda SO
LOC - Comrne<doJ Paper 1 SO
SAFS - SRF Loan 5 SO
SAFe - SRF Loan 8 $3.000.000
WCA - W..... Capital Account S55.930.ooo
REV - Rate Revenue $41.100,000 S113,13O,ooo
Less ExpancItur...: $, 13.830.000 1113,830,000
Balance III
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS
Rev.".....: $IF - W_1er System O""elopm&nt FaesII"1'&Cl F.... $9.660,000
B, - Serie& 2008 IIonda SO
RR - Operallng Aes.rv. Revem.s $1,280.000
B3 - Seriaa 2010 Bonds SO
SRF - S1a1ll _ng Fund Loans SO
LOC - Canmoreial P_r. Ad<I1IonaJ SenIor Lien SO
SCA - W_.... CopitaJ Account TrlUlSfors $91.540.000
REV - _ Rev...... $50.880.000 $15S,340._
Las. ExpenciIurss: $153.340.000 SI5a,340._
Balance $0
SOlID WASTE DISPOSAL FACIlITIES PROJECTS
Revenues: L TF - LandIIIJ TIP\ling FMs $6.820.000 $6,820._
Less Expendilw8$: $6.820,000 $6,820,000
Balance $0
PARKS & RECREATION FACIUTIES PROJECTS
Revenues: IF -Impact Fees SO
GR - Gran., Reimbu.....menls $0
GF - aen_ Fund SO $0
Less Expen<lllures: SO $0
Balance $0
STOIlllWATER IlA/llAGEIIENT S'tSTEM PROJECTS
Revenues:
GR - Gr.ms' ReimbursamenlB $10.000.000
CF - Cany FoNoud 11.358.900
RR - OparaUng AMeNe ~ ~100.ooo
GF - GoneraJ Fund $32.045.900 $43,30S.-
Less Expenditures: $43.304.800 $43,30S,-
Balant<l $0
JTOTAL PRO.IECTS TOTAL REVENUE $541,815.-0'
$635.751'- SOURCES
G:\Compr~p PlANNING GMP OATAIComp Plan --c,ao "-lNP-_'CE\IIOC\D_ 10IlCCAllP1ll2KIICIE ,_ (10-14>-*"
CIE.22
Concurrency Management - 18
!
I
1
Q.
g
o
f
;!
;;/::
i~
o~
l!;"
..0:
....<
ill!!
......
:z:<
~~
~
~
o
:i
:3
o
o
:;;
!:l
~
{
l-
I
~
!
...
l
."
1
"
g
! ~ s
o :!..-
~ e ~
~ gi~iii~~~~gg~gggg
~~ i~8~ ~~~I~
;~ ii~!!=~U~i
I-
~ t
! ~
~ iiii~gi ~ii~~g iii~iiigi~i ai~igg~ggg~~
~ ~ ~ 0 i 8 w8g~
. m N ! ~_~ ~a::
:. _ :i tit- *_..;; ~
I- gia ~ii i iiaa
8 i ~ I
II H !I!
: c: tit "
gi~~iigaig~i iiigi~g~~~~~~
! t = 8 ! g~jl~~~~
~ ~ ~ _ N :~~ ~*~~
.... .. """'-;:
a ~iii~a iii88i~iiii a~8iiiiai i8
.~ ~ ! & h ~ :!~ ~ :
c ~ .. tit- .... ; -. ""'" ""'"
UUgUn
! , I 8=
o i ~lil
! ~ ..
Ii:
5
I
- ~
oiig~ii~i~i iiiii~~i~gg~~ ~
~s ~ g ~~ ~~E~~ ~
~~ ~ u ~i =~.a- :
~ ~
~ i ~
~ ~~ g
~ fE~U)O) - ~
::l~~~g~~;tlilQQ..:.g~
oooooo8oo(5~ooo
~
o
0:
Jt
~.. .~ HII
~~. ~ ! It~1
~ ~ <t. ~ilj
~ .~;!
S!~ ~ i& i 'I
h i' ~ l!-'
~ ~. 8l 5! ~;;ll
~ n~~
! ~. .~ t~t-8
ill liSP
.~ ~. n~1
h ..... I
l:l ~~II
~ oH!
.; .~, 0 -I
0 Ut'
~
4~ <l;
/Ii. i i~d
UP
UII
UsS
Hil
8H
~":S!
~hf
Concurren M
cy 8nagement _ 19
i CiI
,.
~ ~ Ii, !Ii
Q. 8
.. ] h~ H!,~]
j'il1 ~IIlj .5.5!!!!~
u;::I; n II ~ 8
, , 0"" en 0 Q. II II
(/)::1; < 0: -J-J...Jco
:!
-II
S
'"
;;;
~
&
I
....
<
~
j
I-
...
..
~
I
..
f
i
"
g
~
w
~
~
i
"
i
<
~
~
.~
!
!
i!J
s
.!!!
c
t
'8
Q.
<
U
o
'"
!z
w
::;
w
>
o
a:
...
!
<i!::
>-0
-N
- ~~
COO
= u..C\1
>-0"'
~~~
~S~
WW--'
",<
OU
",S!l
>-"-
>-
z
::r
o
u
a:
W
::;
..J
o
o
....
o
'"
N
;g
;;
~
~
'"
i
E
~
a.
E
!l
n
"
U
"0
..
."
~
S
U)
~
a:
C
...
!z
::r
o
:l!
...
8 8 8 8 8
~ ~~~g~
~ ~;;;..~
22ii22
ii
i
~
888~28
~ ~ ~ g
g ;;; ~
8 8 ~
~ 8
;;; ~ ~
8 8 822 2 2 2 2 2 2
~ 8 ~
; z; ~
8~22~222~2~
~
~ 8 ~
o
~
..
ao
...
~ ~ ~ 8 2
~
N
..
~ ~ ~
~~~~~~
l:(f fil 8
m ~ ;:;
~ ~ ~ ~
Q.
"
~ ~ ~
Q. " "E
:g ! ~ ~
ell ~ t- to i
ell ....J :!; E CIl
~ .!! 51 E ~
::! ~ ~ ;1j ~
N ... co
~ 8 8
ao <Xl or>
i i i
~228~~
~:
;;;
o 0
.. ..
~ 8 8
g ~
~~
~ ~
8 8 8 ~
8 g 8
;;;it;
2 ~ 2 ~ 8 8
o 0
o 0
; ;;
8 8 ~
8 ~
;:; ..
~ 8
o
o
;:;
~ ~ ~
z
o
;::
o
::r
a:
i
o
o
5
..
'"
o
"
~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
8 8 ~
~ ~
ot
88
00
gg
m'"
co
I;'..
,.....
I'
:
I
E ~S"l5
; !i~
~ ;~~
E~~!I
&8" E"O 8
i"6 ii i
~~(J).c2'
g--g i [~
~~ ~~ ~
~ III CUlJJ:>
~i~~
-:::!m::J
i! ~ ?:-;~
>= ~ o! .
~~!5i"O~
G's1:!~H.
'i.28~E>'
g. oi .! ~fi g
i~~~:;
coet'.Q>m~
2: ~~ ~ ~
~~H"E
g.2co1ii~J!!
Q;~;~K6
15 p !l.E-;
o Q.~.eGl.!!
w:B>&li2
t- ~~a.~J
~u:EBo8
:::
..
><
,..:
o
~
d>
a;
E
o
"-
j
.>
co
a:
--'
<(
z
u::
..
..
:is
~
Gl
~
o
Q;
~
a
..
(/)
ao
~
.,
~
:>
"'
<
U
9
~
w
~
N
.~
~
:g
::!
C
co
E
"E
~
a:
<(
w
"i
i
.c
i!!
~
9
(oj
>-
z
::r
o
:l!
...
!z
::r
o
:l!
" 8 2 lil
ii 8
a m
~
!z
::r
o
:l!
...
8
~ 8
i t;
~
>-
z
::r
o
:l!
...
~ 8 lil ~
g 0
<:' [i;l
i ..
~
>-
z
::r
o
:l!
...
~ ~ lil
~
I
~
..
" .. '"
~ 5 g
~ 2 C CD
" 3 3 ~
2
~
"
.. m
~ ~
~ -lJ ~
Go ~ ~ 'E
~ .5 "8
~ ~ ':i
~ - i
~ 6 ~
E ~ !
8 ~ (/)
:: ~ ~ 8
ij Q)CD~
o 0
.. ...
~ ~ 828
8 8
~ ;;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'"
m ~ CIl
..0; ~ c s
i~ ~E ~
'" ~ - ':: !5 '" il
~ - ~ ~ c; ~ m
a; ~ as ~ .. ~
"~c)!"E:il.l!l
~ l ~ i ~ ~ ! !
~ '< ~ " " ~ l3 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ a:l co CD ~
~ ~ ! ~
8 i. 882
~ 8 ~
;;;
28
~
~
~ ~8
g
N
~
8 8
~_ 8
z; ;
a ~8
@
<Xi
o 0
... ...
~ !;l 2
8 8
~ ..
88
g.,;-
~
m~
8 8 g
8" 8
:: ..
..
28
o
I!!
or>
iii
:g
~
..
:>
o
:>
:g~8~
~ 0
..
c
..
E
" ~
~ ~ ~ ~
<I> <I> tIS 't:
ClIo... 0
~ "E E g.
.. ~ 8 ~
i a: g ~
e :0 'i
.g CP e
~ j ~
~
co 9
~ l!!
'"
M cg
.. c
~ ~
- Q.
-e -e -e
" :> "
c;~'i
a: 0:: a:
'" N--,
~ R~
I g g~
Concurrency Management _ 20
III
~
c
,2
Q.
~
~
a.
<
o
o
8 ..... 0 0.....
in 0 o~
~ 0 0 010
Z 0 ;g 0 0"';
;:) ...l ~ 0 0."
j! C\I 0 ....."
0 Iii ri ;0
:E e 10 ... ... CD
c( .... ....
...
0 0 0 00
~ 8 0 .... 8~
....
z 2 0 <Xi oeD
;:) 0 10 011)
0 0 ;;; '" 0'"
:E ~ II) ;cti
c( ;;; ....~
~ ....
...
0 0 0 00
~ 0 0 0 .... 00
0 0 00
z ; 0 <Xi cai
;:) 0 0 00
0 ;;; 0 ........
:E '" .... -
'"
c( ?i ;;; ;;;
....
0 0 0 00
~ 0 0 .... ....0
I 0 .... ....
z 0 0 0
;:) 0 '" '"
0 ;;; C\I C\I
:E 0 0
< ~ ;;; ;;;
....
0 0 0 00
~ 8 0 0 ....0
i C\I 0 C\I
Z 0 '" 0 a>
;:) 0 '" 0 '"
0 .:. ;;; C\I 0 C\I
:E 2 a> .. 0
c( .... .... ;;;
>-
... IL
0 ..... 0 0.....
~ t- o in 0 ....~
0 0 10
Z I 0 <Xi 0 as
;:) 0 0 0 0
0 10 '" 0 '"
:E .... ,..:- C\i ~
c( .... ....
>-
.... IL
0
0
.. 0
III c5 :;!
.... 0
z ~ '" e
... 0
0 i!l cC cC
i=
0 0 0 g ()
;:) 0 '"
a: ..... '" 0
~ 0 0
Ul 0 0 0
Z <D '" <D '"
0 0 ~ 0 0
0
III
0
Z
III
ll!
ll!
0
0
....
0
..
..,
0
0::
...
-.: f
m
>
cr: in
c
0 j
"E
0 ~ E
~ 0
~ " li5
III .!!2 Q)
a. ~ "0
E III III
~ Q)
a: ~ < ~ ::!'
w .?: .. ~
~ Gl .. ~
c( It Gl
;!: ...J (!) lD
:E 10 i
... '" c; i~
a: .. c;
0 0 ~ ~!-l
~ in u; :;;
Ul
Ul
!Z
w
:E
w
>
o
a:
1:1.
;!!!
:<i!;:
~o
-C\I
1:1..
_ c( ~
coo
= LL C\I
~ocn
iiiwa:
-...J<
J:;:)W
Xc>-
WW...J
J:<
00
Ul~
>-u.
~
z
;:)
o
o
a:
w
:::;
...
o
o
.....
9
'"
C\I
..;.
o
;,;
Q)
:0
{!
en
C
Gl
E
Gl
>
e
t
S
'5.
III
o
'0
Gl
-S
~
.<:
b:l
'"
C)8 0 8
00 .... ....
o - 0
C\l0
. 0 '"
00." '"
8~ 0
C\I....
>-
U.
~g
o"!.
",0
.0
..........
0
o~
C\I....
>- en
u. X
,..:
~g 9
00 '"
C\l0 en
' II)
<DC) ~
g~
>- &
u. "0
m
en
>=
Gl
E a:
m
f?~ ...J
<
t~~ ~ z
u::
- ~ ~~ en
.E 0:: Gl
~ ~'O 5 :0
.,
:2l!!Q)8 I-
OJ
lH~E 15
Q. >-.c: ... ~
:ggb:l$
~Gl C> 0
::J '- co c: in
.S!' :; :E ..Q
LLO-ca .0
E
E8~$ m
Q.
-~ ~CDS~ ..
~:5 s:; Ci) en
(1)0 ~g 00
~~~~ ~
U1
Eo.-c OJ
(I) -.~ 0 ::
OOcn"C .E
a;scm_
CCI)"-::J .0
~ ... as..o ::>
CD ~ en en
>.jg '- U; <
gC.28 0
~~~o 0
a:
5 ~:g.!!!. <
c: 0 > 0 UJ
8 ~K~ ....
.0 0
.c CUi ~ ~ 0
::> C\J
::!' ~~5~ en
- !~U:::l "
'" .2
Gl - .::> ~
< crsO!c:
"C(I)CUCD
CD-.c: > '5
Q.-6Cl)~ ~
OCDCO-
""C.c:-o
'" b:ll!! en c
~ UJo2 S m
E
'<::C5~ "0
j!:o- 0..- C
c:oeu; Q)
... ~ma.CD E
< 0> 0 e <
'c ~ 0""_,,, a:
::> 0 ~"2~~ i1l
E l-
E w =a~:c5i ~
0 => 05 ijl ~ . >
0 z .;;;
..-Q)>E "
UJ ~a)Ci~Q) Gl
~ > .<:
W ~~] ~f Gl
0 a: ~
0
~
(!)
Concurrency Management - 21
s
..
o
c
.g
Q.
o
::i!
-iJ
rf.
<
o
o
...
....
z
~
w
~
Q.
i!
~;;
. ~&~
<0
. "-
....0'"
i~~
~:>~
wfiJ:;i
~~
~"-
z
:>
8
II:
W
3
o
o
9
r-l
15
;,;
..
~ II:
~ i
.. i
E
..
e
Q. ~
E
S
~
"0
~
."
..
~
!IE
B
t
~~~~~~~~~~~~aaaaa~
...._Nr.:"'....~"'...;ON....
.....,.aoOO'...Monl"'-......"
tI't..,t; ...~...to't~ ...
~aaa~aaaaaaaaaaa~aia~a~a~aa~a~a~aaaaaa~~~~~~
~~~~~~
...,"" M~
~ 0 ~~~a.~;~~~~~~~aaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaa~aaaaa~~aaaaaaaa~a~~a~aaaaa~aaaa
5 ; ~~!~g;fi~g!a...~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ =~;; ~ foO) ...
.. ~
!IE I
i .
1;:
~~E~a~~~~~a~aa~aaaaaaaaa~aaaaa~a~aaa~a~aaaaaaaaaa~~~aaa~aaaa~aa
~~~~ao~!~aa~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~
toot ... ~ a~~.., ...'" ~
~ ~
!l !
.. 1;:
a~~8~~~~~g~~~~~~~aaaaaa~a~~~~aa~aa~~aaaaoa;~aa~aa~~aaa~~aaaaaaa
~~~~~;;:e;;~;;a ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ S~ ~
to") ...: ."", _ 0Cl ""'" .-.
~ ;; ~...., ..,
~~~~a~~~s~~aa~a~~~~~~a~aa8a8...,~~aa~aaa~~~~a~aaa~a~i~aia~aiaaa~aa
~ I ~~~~ ~~~:~"" ~ ~~a~~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~ g ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ i to't ~ ... ;;;~ ..,~~ III't a;;;:; ..,...,;; toot... ;It;;
: ~
------------8~g~~~~~~~~~o~888~gog~88goo~~8m8888o~oomo~80~------
E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&&&~&~&&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&~~~~~~&&~~~~~~
~ I
:>
I!:
~
8~~~~~~888~~~8~8~8888888mgg8g88g88g~8g88g888gg8g~gg8g8888~2~222
~ ~N~NNN~~~~NNN~~ggN~NN~~~~NNNN~~NNNNNNNNNN~~NNNNNNNNNg~gNNN~N~~~
II
8
l:;
i
N
~~ g
~~
~..
g-
H
-u
il.c
~~
li-
;; ~
I~ ~
.9 .!i
~'$
.~
:ll
J!
~
~ ~
e5; ClQClCl~
~ 0; ~~coc:;:;l
. :ll .:ll:l::ll:l:<
~ l!Cl~2222'8
o ~ ta O. .......... \c< "
~E:~.;a~..e.2..e~....l
~~! ~~~~~~
o..5~ USSSS~
it"~8"'='-='iiuoo"g
z.~"il'i:~~i:C:~~rn
~~l;z:5:S~~~
o':f "~~~~~$
,,] ~~~ fU~
< bJl~!="~H~!:
"'~P]~~::!"""'~
~~~~~~az~~~~
"
2
"
~
u
. .:..:..:. i5.;::J.......~ ol: I; ..:ll:ll <'l
!!:~....~..~~~....::J:!1.H=~Q
~ gs ~ ~ i ~ ~ p; ~'.i ~ ~ ~ a ~
zzz;z~3~z:z:8~&iz~:t(n
.i!~~~~.hH~
B ~ .= ~ ~ CI: 0
.. .. il u t ~ '"
3::!:Ul:i~ ~i:n:ll
.o!:;zzzZ~UUJ~UVl
~
~
!:
..
or,
~
=
tjo
;;~
~ or.
z.~
il
~
~
~ c~~i$'"";'i~~
e 'J~ J! ~ ::l; j- ~ ill "'.
5 ;fJ~ e 10-
... ::l;",,, en :>el
. 8~~~N~~~~~~ N;O~~~O-N~;~~~8N~~~~~88SSSN8~~~a~~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~ggRgRg~R~~~~~~
h
F:.:i
~ ~
;~
..-;M-__M
~~~~~~
g~::2~~~
Concurrency Management _ 22
(;j
~
..
..
~
"
Q,
1;i
E
If
."
ill
.~
II:
...J
<
z
u:
..
..
:c
~
"ii
~
~
E
S
~
~
..
~
E
~
<
o
9
a:
<
w
~
..
c
o
B
'S
~
c
..
E
~
..
E
<
a:
<
~
~
~
..
.c
!
Q.
E
9
i!i
s
..
c
IS
it
-8
..
1;
&
..
u
c
I:'!
z
w
:Ii
w
>
o
a:
...
;!l
-'-
..~
>-0
A:~
......
~~
0'"
~~
~\!'
~~
0!!l
/:LL.
z
~
8
a:
w
:;
...J
8
::;;
'"
~
o
or
..
~
..
c
..
~
Q
Q.
.s
s
.a.
..
u
15
~
..,
..
s
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e ~a~~~~~~aia~~~aaa~~~I~~~a~~~~~a~~~~2~a~aa~a~a~~~aa
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g
..~z~___~"~~M~~_~
~ ;; ~I~ ..-t ~ ... ..., ""
aaa~~~a~~aaaaaaa~~~a~a~aa~~~~aaaaaaa~aaa~~aaaaaaaa~a~aaaa~a~~a~a~~a
o a ~ ~ ~~
toot .;; ~ io't
aaa~aaaaaaa~aaaaaaaa~~al~aaaaaaaaaaaa~~aaa8aaaa~aaagaaaaaaa~aa~aa~~a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
"" .;; ~ iII't
aaaaaaaaaaa~aaa~aaaa~aaa~aa~~al~aaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaa~aaaaaaai~~a~aa~~a
~ ~ a ~~ ~~
..., ti M..., "'"
aaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaa~a~~a8aaaaa~~a~~a~~~a~~~a~a~a~aaa~aaaa~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
~ M ~..., ..., ~ ...,...,..., ~ ~ M ~ ..., ~
5=~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~68~~8g8888ggg8288888g8~~~g2888g828gg888g8~~8g~8~~8
N~NNNNN~~NN~N~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~~g~~~~N~N~NN~NNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNN~N
eee~eeeee~eee~~~eeggggggggg8g88888~~8888g88888888888ggggg8....88g88~88
~~~N~~~~gN~~&NNN~~NNNNNNNNN~N~gN~~~~NN~~NNNNN~NNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNN~~2
H
H
~~1
~<lXl
tl; ~:i St e'~ r- r_
~ <S ~ ~o
tl; e:: a:;a; S!-oo ~i.
lXl~~ ~! ~~= ~~
<~~~~~ 2:;] e~'i MM
-~~~~z ~:~ ~!~ ~~~
!~u~~s~ ~~~ ~~~ u.~~ ~ 0
~~l~~!~ ~~~ ]!~ ~Il~? j;~~
~ (5 e c] ~ C S ~.iS I ~ ~ ';: =1:5::> ~ 11-; ~I~
~~~~5E~ ~~3 ~~ij ~." ~ ~ CIC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,s i - .~ Z il ;; ;i ~ '" '5 l! '" ~I! ~ '" Ie 1" _ E E E
'" .. 3 e] 8 ~ .~ ...!l 8::; ~ ;;'" il "q >~ 0 H ~ I~ Ii J< ,e"ll
~ ,!: g gll '" '!l ~I:C ~ 0 E ! ~ 0 8 ~ > . ~ . 0. _
. ~ '''1 ~"I:5 'il ~ .5 _"I .~ ~ e ~ ~ '" ] ~ S ~ ~ _ ~ 'e ~ ~ -" ~ e ...
1j'iii ~ I~Q Eba.g c:: "l;J"'O.s e:is ;::l.2~ 0::: II( ~ct.llt..,
~ ~&l.:l~ '~~Jj-e o...:;;",~u.!! ".5 ~ "'''' ii; G s~!;! E. <~ !l.~
~ ~n~~U!~ H~HHI! ~ ~ IH HIM UHI!I~ ~ i~~~IJ,~
8 :; ~ rr. ~: '- ~ ~ I; ~ l;l ~ ~ ~ l; c; 'Of' ~ 11l ~ < Sill: 1:i SeE -< ~ ::..:;: e ~ ~ ~I~
~ it; J: ~ G ~ .Cl It r:i j c;;. . l:I -= 0 0 --g b' -' 'Il!; .... .. ~ ~"5 ~ g CI ! ~ E u ~ :=t: ~ ~
~Iil~~~:~~~i~~- i~~f~ 1-~~BI~!I~~E~~c~~~~~s~~
"," '~;~~..=l":>:~il'';:''"~~~'" BS'" ~ -".e"'&!-"'~~'=",:,
~~~~~~~~E~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~
~"''''~i~'~~'''~'~.''''~~'''~ ~i~",~~",8oH ~~~~8~~~~~
~~~z~~zj~~~zz~~~z~~a~~~Qi~~z~e~~~z~z~~~~~e~
- _ NN
r__ S N MI
~ ~ ~~
~~~~
~,~ e: e:
=~:::::
~~~~
~~~~
~~~~
1'l$l
~ ~
~':3~~
:!~:!:!
g~~~
2~~S
H HH
~~ ~~~~ ~
"'~ il'~~~ ~
~ !c -~-~~~~ ~
i ~~ ~~~55S$ ~
~ I~~ '" ~~]~~~~!~
I 11- ~ ."'~:::: ~J
~~ I::~~ ~~ ~!~!~~~ ~i
"_lei =~~ ~'C .~.O~G~ ~~
... i;; ~~ n~I~~~j~ ~~
~ B If ~ ,)j oJ! I g ~ "ll '" '" '" ~ ~ . ~ .l!1 ~
.~ ~~g~~ -~~~ ~~e!~~~~n~
~"'~I~-~~eS~~::>. .~~!~~ ~
1~~.~~OOI:J _",,,,.zzzzl~~g
1!~~~~e~~~~s::>11116~~~~~1
I]~_~~"'~~ wO~",BBB~~~~~u~
=~tec~ee~~I~~llleeeeil~
~~~Z~~ZZ~MZ~NQQQZZZZ<~~
-N-------------MN~.N_MN~__ --NM~_ -N__M__________
~~8~~8r--i8~~8~i~$i~8-~Sg~~gg~~~~~g: 88888~ 888~~6555g85gE8
~r__r_r_~r__~~~~~~~g~~ggg~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<ii
~
..
.,.
~
OJ
E
J'
..,
I
t
a:
...J
..
Z
u:
..
..
:c
I!!
"il
~
o
~
j
!
~
..
"il
'"
E
~
..
o
9
a:
..
w
..
o
o
N
..
c
.2
~
'0
o
:::;
E
..
E
i
e
..
a:
..
!!I
~
~
..
1!
Q.
e
9
Ci
Concurrency Management - 23
Q.
~
<
-;;
o
Q.
<
<.>
"
/!!
z
UI
::E
UI
i)
a:
Q.
;!!
;;I;:
....0
$~
~&
oeo
~~
5~
~;t
"lil
~CL
5
"
a:
UI
::;
...
o
"
9
'"
'l'
<!i
-.;
..
~
"
E
..
E
1
s
S
0-
~
"5
..
i
;ll
N
s!
i~aaaa~aaaaaaaaa~aaa~a~aaa~~~~~~a~~~~~~~iiaigs~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~B~;;~~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~..-ttl!;
~aaaaaa~aaaa~a~~a~a~i~~~~~a~a~a~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~a~~aiaaaa~~
8 g 8~ 8 8g8~ 8~
~ a ~~ ~ ~~~M ~M
~aaaaaa~aaa~~a~asaag~a~a~aaa~~aa~~~~~~~a~aa~aiia~ai~iiaa
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~a ~
~ tI'!t ... M ~ ""Milltfllt
~aaii~~~as~i~a~aa~aa~~~ioaiaaa~a~ga~~~~~~~a~a~aa~a~a~~a~a
8~ ~ N ~ ~ a~ ~~~a ~ ~
_M ... ... M ~M'" ~
~a~i~~~~~~a .a~s~~a~~~~~~~a~aia~i~a~~~ag~~~a~iaiaaiaiaaaio
~ ~~ ~~~ ;:~ ~~ :Jg~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~
... ;;M ...~... ;;;; ""... ;;M'" "" ;; ..,
~~~8~~80~~8g088~8~~~goo~0~~888~~8ggoooo~~~00_____________
~~~~~~~g~~~~g~g~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ 2 ~~2 ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~g2~~2~~~~~~
~~8~~~~~~888m~c~c8~~~m8888888C88~~C~~~88~~~~0000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&&&&&&&&&&&&
~ ~
N M
C g
M
~ ,l!
~
~
N ~
C
N
.<,
~ j
~
",; .;
~ ~
~
N
8 'ii ~
.
is ~, '"
-c
0 ~
;: M
n ~ ~
~ e
.g !i
..
x
...:
~
a.
...
E
o
U.
-0
I
~
a:
....
<
z
CL
"
m
:;;
,.!
]
~
13
!
E
!
~
~
.,
E
.Q
"
eo
<
<.>
9
a:
<
w
~
o
~
..
c
o
~
~
::!;
c
~
-g
m
E
<
a:
<
!!l
t
c
..
L;
I!
'"
E
~
c;
-.....-------
~~3~~~;g~8
12Fr:;::;::;::r:~~
Concurrency Management - 24
I
I
~
8
r- OO '~I' mmm ~ auauu
I ~ I~ - ~ '~irH ~l HU
- - ~ ~
t-- l i - ~ 111~..aaaaaa& &
i
- ~ . - & &j&&&i& &""
~ ~ ~ Ii il
~
!
- ! Hi ~ i i i &a~_aiaal
I - 8 . - & ! ii
.
B - - f i 3& 3 i 3 3 i i 3 a~aa~
I . - - - Ii . ! i
!
~ - 8 mr ~ . i If i 0 U ~a P
I ~ - - HI ~ !H
~ -
~
f
.
~= = = - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ U--i ~- -hi U iiiiU
~~ -iii-Iii iiiiii iii --g-
. -i
~~12 ~
ii~ ~
~ U ~ - IU~I i - ~ HI I U I ie--- - HUH IU
.U ~ Iii
~
~
g
~ ,
I ~
Ih~
III
.
. I
I
o! J
!
(I i
I ~
-~UU
~
~ .
j -
~
;j
it
"I
J
!
j
Ii
~
j
-J""
]I
n
II
I H
l~IH .ji
')1&.11.- Jd
~L H
· -- ~ji~.~B
~
II
.
;
j
1
J
~
,
l
~
I
!
!
~
~
j
i
I
~
. . . .~:
. . ~. I
I ";m j C ~
~- 13iJ3iJ3iJq ~ ~-
· ~ ~ 19<J~i" - I~~~IU
, i
I.
I ~
t ..
! !
I =
iW
N C'l... -.... _ C'lf">....
i ~~~~~~~~~
Concurrency Management _ 25
!
I
~
g
~a~aaaaaa~~ a~a~aa~~~~~~ila~aa~aa
f ~ !~~ ~ l ~~~l~l~~ I ! I
~~~a~aaa~a~ ~ ~ ~~
~~~! ! l~~~~ !!!
aaaaa.. a.aasa:aaaa a aa.a aaaas.aa
a.aaaa.. aaa..aaaa.a
i-iaaaa a..aaaaaaaaia
I -
aa~aaaaaaaaa
!
ssg_as-""""""
gS""
n
~1~~m~p.
1lIllI~IIIIlIllI!nl~lt
~ ~J,
-11~ III Iii
I~~~ I~n IU~
"""S"""i
· a
.aaaaa
aaa a~a~ aa~aaaa a ~~aa~aa a a~aaaa a
! l!~ ! il!! I !
aa~aaaaaaaa aaa aaa ~aa~~aa~aa~aa a~~aaaaaa~aa~~aaaa ~ ~ g
! ! il!~!! if ! ~~ ~!5
~ aa~
! ~
l
~ ih
J
. ~
!i
!! uu
I
~
aaa~~~a~a~aa~~~aa~ila~aa~aa~aa~a a~
!35 ! g ~!I !~~! ! a i ~ i
1
I
i
I
i I
1 .
J ..
i ]
~'~!~!I
i ~ ~ U
a~a~au~aa~a~
" l H~ ~ li
U~
~~ii~~il~llii~~iii~ i~~~~~i~ ..~~g
h i gHUU -
H .
~ ~ .
lil;llllW
~if~11 i
~aM8iigQ~=~E;~~~~~j
~~ ~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
.
!
I
!
.
i
~lglglili ~ ~ I B B ~ ~
~ I~II~~I~~~ i~~~ ~~~I
~i
~
- -
g--.
g --
~
I
B
"
~
i
i
I
i
j
~
I
I
~
~
I
I
I
· h J · I
J I J'i H. - I j I
J i I I! ..S i B; " i
a II "& t.! i~ n~1 ..
jj:~j!!i3 o!jl-'II~ ii iii~iJ! j
~~~-jjli; ,I I. Jill_'ll 'il~.!.~I~
~~~~~ ~i~~~g~!~.~~~i!~~~ i~~i~i~~i~~
~~~~p ~~~~p~~p~p~~~p~p~~~p~p~~p~~~~~
Concurrency Management _ 26
2-2 - i - i 2
. . ! ~ I
.
I L
. I u
~ ~
~ ~~~l L
~
f
~
~
ii
~
.
~
J
~~
!~
.0
~~
e
i
8
~
.
J
I
i
,
j
Illi ~~~ II li I~II ,u 1111~Ufli.
I~I~ I I; ! ~ i -
I.
i ..
~ 33-
. ~ "&
i ..
II I f
li 3 U ;
.
-
II I ~
~
a
.
I Ii -ll I -
^
i~~~ iiUa , ~U .. -222 i-
n i-
i U --i-i U ~ Uh~i-'
.
~
~
f
i> - I i
II '.111I ] . . . .
d 11 i
. IUf . I l . i 'IUU · I. I
i . . !
I . ~ . HjH~" .
. .B I Ii in
. lk 3< ~ ;t . ~ . ill 3< ;t ): j; il' ~ :t: ):
j ~ = . iH - >!~8. ~
I -~ ~ ~~~
E~. .
"~ l 1I .
i li
= I " . a
~
i"
~. .
a=
~
~ ,
a a
~
~:
~
, ~
~ .
~"
~
Concurrency Management - 27
N
II
i '
"1
Us
m
jJi
j 'j
llh
tii
Iii!
o. [s
~I. .l
. ~
I,lj
iJi
-Hi
hll
~
.
;,;
i
I
l
~
I
i
I
i
J
i
~
I
I
I
EXHIBIT .A.
COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FISCAL YEARS 2007-2011
1De table below iliemizes the types ofpoblic facilities and the souroes afrevenoe. The center column cont:am the S-Year mlOUllI of!aciJty re...-enues. The rigbt coIUDID
is .. calculation of expenses ""CJ'Iu& revenues fer each type d pobJic faeility. All deficits are ac.cunwJa1ed lUl a sublotal. 1be subtoW deficit is the wuroe of additional
revenue utilized by Collier County to fu.Dd. the deficit in mier to maintain the levels of service standmls. as referenced in tbe Capibllmp-ovemcnt Element.
ExpeDditllre Rnemue A.-JIll_ill T....
Projects Re'WCDue Source
ROADS
Revenues: IF - Impact Fee$: / COA Revenue $20$.soo,OOO
AV -Ave Maria $34.344,000
CiA. Gas Tax Revenue $1I3,~21,OOO
OR - 0rIll.t$ , R.eimbunemcnlS $42,$44,000
CF . Cury Fcnr.trd $293.661,000
1R . Tranden $1,$00
OF. GoacnJ Fund $120.100,000
DC - Developer Contributioo Agreements J Ad\."3noed RcimbursemeulS $0
RR. - Re,renuc Reserve -$4.019.300 ~
less Expenditures: $6S1,lI3,OOO S6S7~113.000
BaI.nce $148,951,2tO
POTABLE WATER
Revenues: '''IF - WateT S)l$tem J)e,,-elopment Fees $91,207.459
Bl . Series 2006 Boods $19.301.241
B2 - Series 2008 Bcmds $49.soo,OOO
B3 . Scriei 2010 Bonds $61.600.000
lJ)('1 - Cexnmercial Paper 1 $1$.883,5$1
SRF5 - SRF Loan S $16.1$0.000
SRF<i . SRF Loon 6 $40.000.000
WCA - Waru Capital Acoount $36,$43.443
REV - Rate Revenue $5,461,703 $3oU.253.403
Less Expenditures $342.253,403 $342,253,4t3
Balance $01
WASTEWATER
Revenues; SIF - WU1ewater System De\.'t:lopment Fees $~J.l$O,~2S
Bl - Series 2006 Boods $19,so3,713
82 - Series 2008 Boods $6.500.000
B3 - Series 2010 Bonds $4,000,000
SRFl . SRF Loon I SO
san . SRF Loon 2 $0
SRF3 . SRF Loon 3 SO
SRF4 . SRF Loon 4 $0
SRF7 . SRF Loon 1 $40,200,000
SRFS. SRFLoon 8 $76,200,000
SRF9. SRFLoon 9 $4,700,000
SRFIO - SRF I..oau 10 $2.310,000
SRFII . SRF lDUll) $1.9$0.000
SRA2-SRFLoon 12 $1.200,000
SRFJ3 . SRF Loon 13 $1,870.000
SRFl4. SRF Lou 14 $2.712,$00
SCA - Wastewater Capital. Account $43.81~,262
REV - Rate Revenue $6,84~. 743 $308,96U43
Less Expenditures: $308.%6.143 $308,966,143
Bal""" $0
SOLID WASTE
Revenues: User Fees $3.816.000 $3,81~
l...ess Expenditmes: $3,816,(0) $3,816'-
$0
PAIlICS
Revenues: Impact Fees $4$.000.000
Gnnts $8.700.000
Genenl Fund $6.000.000 $59,700,000
l.essExpcnditures.: $59,100.000 $S9,7OI,ooo
Balance $0
STORM WATER
RevenUM: GR - Gluts I Reimb~ntli $18.950,000
CF . Cury F""",d $0
CRA - Community Redevelopment Area I Municipal Service Taxing Unit $0
OF. Genenl Fund $41,604,517 $60,554,517
LeiS ExpelldillJteS $60,5$4.$1 1 $60,554,517
Bal""" SO
~OTAL PRQJECI'S -~ Sl.-,3&4.w!
Sl~ --
Concurrency Management - 28
G:lComprehensivelEAR Amendment Modifications - 2004 EAR\DCA SubmillaJs. 18 September 07lTotaJ Tables FINAL - Revised Formal9-13-07.xls
26
e J
'!
c
~ I
..
.9
i ~
...
~ ~
"0
.. "i
I
-g
..
-g
~
l!!
~
~
"
li
e
...
~
~
~
..
oS
~
5
i
E
.!!!
e !e-
to
~
c
l!
:::J
~
:
!
i
J!l
..
"0
.!
B
J
a:
I
l!!
..
::;
)
..
"0
,...
""
~
a
'"
li
~
~
!
e ~ ..
~~
.. c
~.!!
J!l 00
;; !ll
III jl
0 .!!l,!
0:: ...J_
Concurrency Management - 29
A IT ACHMENT F
~
~
;;..
!Xl
~
~
~
0..
a'l'i
i~
E;?
. ~
~Ii:
Ii
~8.
~~
z':
~
<(
~
~
f
'"
::I'!
i ~
J~<!
~~i~~
l i~ J i
~!!i);J
Ul IL.u z s.
U it ~~ ,i Ii
..
E
!I
!e-
m
~
.~
2;< U}
'.J.>'~ u ~ ~
~~F-WZ_
~<r
ATTACHMENT F
0l,_00Il
_Ill.W
;~
~
'"
~
eat__....
t
Concurrency Management - 30
r>
g
E
ti
~
."
'"
E
~
[
~
~
..
Iii
t
~
~
c:
,E
:e
J
E
..
!
i
~
Ii>
"
c:
"
I
"
!
e
I
[
e
..
;;
is
<>
~
>-
1
"
il
Gl
:0
1;;
5
'"
~
""
!
~
..
r: .,
f~
~ ij
i i~
ex :.:it
~
~
g
i
b
..
1
~
i
i
j
! I
II
I
I
+~
!l I..
tOf;%
gj""
Concurrency Management - 3 I
"
8
'"
!
I -
oSf
. u L3
1c Ql:
!<li
~g
:U
~5
it
~..
" c:
,~~
:g
..;;:
~i
.~ ~ i
l~ ~
wj c
..
il ~
gs ~
0U ~4i
~2 i:!S
~I !l
~ ~ }i~!
iii,.. u.i%&
Ii II l! !~ Jl ~l
~I~~~~~
or;
I
J:
~
ATTACHMENT H
ONITA BEACH I'll)
I
!
,
1tt1llM'MQ~ ~b~ltI);..l)tMtt
UtE COUNT Y
o
~
,to
L-
1-<:
10
10
j....J
/~~
VANDERBILT
BEACH RO EXT
~.
I~
I~
'0
l~
l~
J.
(~'
I j Oil.. WEl L RO
~~~
) 1 g
I;
o
:5
"
:x:
w
>
\jJ
o
>
...;
to
o
....
o
If)
w
o
'16 ~tlCT --. """,,,
~~y_m~_~_
..... C........... U""_,,
C$l".RMdy- ::008
llMMOKALEE RO
\:951'
\..
::'&1_"'1_
OLDEN GATE BLVD
o
:3 CST
tl1
OC
~
tC'j!t,o.pnia~y
c-lI""""~_
co_. U>T~",~
Tl:MA, _.R_
HX.rr "P"-,
C4Ut'J!:yCST ~e1l6y l00S
"'n;MA. Sf._ ~.~
FP(JTA~
Ct}~~yCSi ru.aot 1:0 ~1<20-~~
)'
-;~" RATTLESNAKE
-;", " HAMMOCK folO
~.A "
~ \
('..,
.~
~"'''"
a
>;
in
x
~
-'
....
o
u
Legend
'''.''
Existing Deficiency {Ve$letl Trips}
- 2010 Deficiency
TCMA Boundary
Co-~ c.~_at,-m'iiir:f#tl.
"".,~.5Cl'iti!RNU
TCEA Boundary
Concurrency Management - 32
,
I
I
Ie
12
.f?
i~
1".
j~
I~
e
2
'"
>
'"
'"
f?
E
!
'.'
g
p~
co
"-
12
?Ii
~
S
,.
~
s.
'"
E
"'
(f
'n
;::
~
'"
>
~ "'
'"
,. c
"
M -5
'i' c
1:
if
'"
~
~
~
~
1>
c.
-
~
-
i3
"$
.",
'"
.,
t~
-g
<;1
6:
1'i
'"
..
0
"
*
'i
..,~
z,
I
:;;
~
~
~
f
"
.,
2
'"
ii ~
'" ~
:;; ".
'" ~
"
<' 1ii
"" '"
111 g
w ~
'"
.7<
"
t>'~
:::
fl;
~<
~
"
,.
;;;
*
&
~
.~
<t ::i
;fi '< u
~~!
ii
15~~
lj'
~
3-
"-'
6..
Concurrency Management - 33
ATTACHMENT H
jj-;~~iK.:lR.~_ k':t'*e"~".n. b.; f"''f~.,
~NlTA BEACH RD
Oi:.. WELL RD
(;A ;." i<:.VU
if.AM()KALEE RO
HANDALL 5:"VD
GSll;~;1'-;.;
,<<<XJ....w""':>'
.-e
~~I*"~. R:;t;d
D
:>-
~
N'
Legend
Existing Deficiency (Traffic Counts)
H/~TTLE-SNAKE ,....
HAMMOCK RD ~
-'
u
()
[,,,sling Deficiency (Vested Tnps)
~ 2011 Deficiency
[ill
TGMA BouMa/)'
TeEl>. Boundary
~
Concurrency Management - 34
Urban Development Patterns
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the GMP for their effect upon the pattern and timing of
urban development throughout the County.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
The Collier County GMP has two primary designations within the Future Land Use Map, Urban and
Rural! Agricultuf'dl. All land within the County geography will fall within one of these categories. The
majority of coastal area west of County Road 951 and the entire lmmokalee area, with the designation of
Urban on the Future Land Use Map, promotes a diversity of urban development and a wide variety of land
uses within these designated areas. The Rural/Agricultural designation does not prevent development, but
rather limits the array of land uses allowed within the designation. In addition to the limited array of land
uses outside of the urban designation, the GMP does provide tor concentrated pockets of urbanization
through the development of to\\iTIS and villages within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and the Rural
Lands Stewardship Area. The towns and villages are designed to provide a range of land uses with options
within the f'ange of housing types as well as mobility options. The future development of the towns and
villages within both of the districts is a primary strategy employed by the GMP to bring goods, services and
employment opportunities to the eastern portion of the County and end a reliance upon the Urban area to
the west for these commodities and the vehicles miles traveled and corresponding green house gas
emissions associated with the long commutes.
With the absence of a designated urban service or urban growth boundary, the Collier County Gro\\1:h
Management Plan utilizes two primary controls to shape or influence the pattern of urban development,
capital expenditures and land-use controls. The capital expenditures contained with the Capital
Improvement Element of the GMP provides for the expansion and extension of transportation corridors,
public facilities and urban services and infrastructures which shape the land market. The Urban designated
area has been the location for the majority of the COUnly' s capital infrastructure expenditures, as evidence
by the infrastructure maps provided for at the end ofthis section. The Land Use controls established by the
GMP and implemented within the Land development Code shapes the arrangement of allowable and
prohibited land uses.
To evaluate the effectiveness of these controls, an assessment of the growth and development within the
individual planning communities provides an appropriate barometer. The urban planning communities are
North Naples, Central. Naples. East Naples, South Na les Golden Gate, Marco, ban Estates and
Immokalee. The rural planning communities are
-
1
Urban Development Pallem
Planning
Community
North Naples
Central Naples
East Naples
South Naples
Golden Gate
Marco
Urban Estates
Immokalee
Sub-Total
Developed
land*(less
Ag)
13,500
5,7
3,8
7,543
6,863 I
1,486
14,376
5,041
58,405
Undeveloped
land (less
Ag)
4,.381
702
807
2,530
1,254
4,741
3,474
789
18,67$
Conservation Agricultural
Total
% of land
Preservation
Acres
Developed
69.21%
86.21%
65.69%
59.97%
82.69%
7.35%
68.32%
28.39%
Urban
(Source: 2009 Property Appraiser Records & Collier County GIS data)
. Includes developed Residential, Commercial, Industrial. Institutional Use land, Government, Golf Courses and R-O-W, Utility, Outdoor Rec. land
atc
With the exception of Immokalee and the Marco planning communities, each urban planning community is at or
past the sixty percent developed stage. The urbanized area with the existing infrastructure and services readily
available is where the County has anticipated the majority of development to locate. As the County transitions
into the next decade of growth and development, it is expected that this pattern will continue as each of the
urban planning communities begin to approach build-out. In addition to the expected growth within the urban
planning communities, the one rural planning community which has experienced considerable growth within the
EAR evaluation period is the rural estates. The rural estates within the EAR evaluation period has seen a thirty~
six percent increase in developed acres, The magnitude of this growth, while not unexpected due to the pre-
platted nature of the planning community, has placed pressure upon the transportation system due to the limited
land uses allowed for within the planning community. Whether this pattern of development in the rural estates
continues over the next seven years is contingent upon the supply and demand balance of available units and
their pricing points in the Urban area. Whatever the future rate of growth is moving forward, general accepted
planning principals recognizes the need to bring a diversity of land uses to the area. '[he private marketplace
and County government has responded to this pressure witIl the adoption of tIle Randal Boulevard Commercial
Subdistrict to the Future Land Use Map in July of 2010, specifically to bring the goods and services required by
the estates residents in closer proximity to the communities dwelling units. Services and employment
opportunities continue to develop in neighboring sub-districts to the rural estates, as well as request to bring
these opportunities interior to the rural estates.
The following maps will illustrate the location existing population, vacant and undeveloped land for the County
as well a'5 the location of the public facilities and infrastructure currently available.
2
Urban Development Pattem
., ,:<~
l
c&CMtJ
"";<<""'~A-0W&~-.,
DU PSiCEHTAGE
PER PI.ANIING COIIlJNI1Y
t
~ CG~i(:~:'~
CorKSCWii
~Mi!es
02,5510
~~Brr;""'''''' t
.'
'0 off:
.
\ -""L,
"~'.J 1.
,.____A___ 'I ~"
.., ~UR! E.!aWs ,So\,
.', .'. .' -~~ 6'
t' · f
h~"",,\ ',.',
, ',;'
, .
..
.,
.
I
,#
0Y;_;~.:i~;',';'
l!G8IlI
~QMif'?'t.
.",..i:it
"IiiIt~
.~~
jj~"
11,*=-
.".......
,~:?ilI
iblll/i:lJel
le.t...
:~;..
l~::..
~ !"*'"
~.t_
;t,tlal;
3
Urban Development Pattern
co PERCBfTAGE
PER PlANNING COlIUITY
C",;::i\
COsANlIXls
PER PI.ANIING ctIIIJNlTY
I
i
!
i
i
;
;
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
i
I
!
i
i
!
i
;
I
i
I
I
i
i
I
I
i
j
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
;..
"'"
-'"",
. ,",>t. "':;0-.
_ _ _ _,,.,.- "'o<~,.~_i.
.- - "r"':". ""~,!C, :.u..
..,"', .........,.'iOl-.;
.. . ,..;r.-..~;:......
......... :':-''''''''-'
~~{ies
~2.5.. 10
" J~
)~
4
Urban Development Patlem
"
iC
\./
5
Urban Development Pattern
"....,.. ~-, ^
t 4.\ ,:J:
c
'-
L.lI
~tO p~ bilge; by TAl
..""'''''1
~_;.%}. 'l ;;;,'\::"!l<~!1'
. 4('",. f*e:{tr...,;.~"
ILJIMiles
'1
J
'1'
,,",
..,..;
~
10
,."...,.,._~-,..,,_.,..,.,,---
"'~.
'~'
c;
4';~ t ) J
~-- -
'JU 1\ _
,5'fJofJ
_(lJ."1\'~
lWIl "'>I'll
3<11 tMII
~ -
'I'Il''IloM",",",
.0IIIl...
! "" c:
. "t
t I~ E
t
EXISTING AM) FUTJRE
W':"<::TE'A'ATER ~ER\;lCE A?EAc; iT"...
:tUll< ':3.lfT w.e~T
t,U '1'/UIE'\ !\.Ml(\C
~~:Tllo\_
":1 II>Ifltl'..1Ili Aj{
~ It C
~ p. ,
." I
t
$
~
~
.;
~
.;
.;
:JThf
wlei
tiC!:',';
'" Slt1'N 1llli'D
'I'VIeIl1Wt
: ;:iIt~:T
""_II
<~'fl_
\IllS....u'l
"":DC,,
(II! "'"""11.'\
ms....
l*~
Sl'liI .CI.
"~~...I[
t'1I'Ift
~ rtl'l;L,
lo.ol!;; I\!.1!fJ
...ro I."
__ "!I'M;!'
EXI(;TING A~,D flIT-IRE
WArm SERVICE ARE:.s ;.;
C(LlB o:.vllTl ~\t""'EIiT
P'-;G: JII.IIL' ~
M;, m:.m__
;l;tn lI.l,1Il! 4J~
6
Urban Development Pattems
COLLIER COUNTY DEPENDENT AND INDEPENDENT FIRE DISTRICTS
WITH FIRE AND EMS STATIONS
LEGEND
I :re LE"2 s=;
- Mwi\:o:t
tftlfCb!ee fll
D~C:lt~l"!
.im'f3'll'l'!
Di'7't.Ue:!l!
Dl:eO'~ ::!t
LJ UT;:$T:~.
LJ~~~t:
:re
7
Urban Development Pattems
, , ;: /"\ ;: l- e; , f1
'- h '.... - ::..
-'.\ "'r
0;
.(-,~.
~
[).)\.';:, n.~.p v%-) K}
IMMOKAL.EE ~ .
1'l~~tIl.l,,!/:;;~ !
_ i
Ii( I
if! a
f.i
,"I-t ,..
'I ~
~
~..
/.---_.~
,/<
~
-~
----t....;
~lItl ~"1::~ lfJ{r
2i
.'"
8
Urban Development Pattern
('\
u
- '", /'\ 1""" f"\
t ;A.3 t '__:
Legend
~ Major Roads
Existing SuiJril1g
~ Leased SUllens
m~~;g W-~l&t; _~:Y
',~......~-:~- '\
j.i;,~n:r~<<tj;~):~J'jcl\".~
f-
D
j t
:""'-
f:_
\._~~
~ ""'^ !""'\
ILl H
Legend
~ ~.aj~Roads
"""-
,..,:'
t"\
~ Existing library
:::
E!.' ,,"-.
Z
ci -<
I --<,
L._.,
9
Urb,m Development Pattern
., < <. ., , . ~, -. ,.... l: . f: [)
: ;...
; ~) -,...,< tl
! j i " ~' '- i ;
- , " . < - , ;... -
~
:J
k__w.II.'t-V._il
Legend
~\~, l:-$?'wiJ,:
~ M~iii Roads
.. Exisling GMm~nl eu;dings
Is
Gov~18vjQings
linc'~ CO!lS!!';;cricn
'~,j_k,!!WC;_,
l.t~~;_ifJti
---
m~~~<<,~~~
~8
IVlJ>(.zL~-C
"
~!
ill.'!: ti b.mtl<ll ;;!!l"
~~lC?Wit>~t ~~~~_
-~'
2a
~
->'*,',.t
"
n...n.r-LJIMiles
o 1,5 3 6 9 12
. < . _ ::c;,
}:lI~\I.'''.ZI_
IU
Urban Development Pattern
D
-
j \
''"''
., "
'"'
i-,r'
i '\
~'D\C~tL
f=C
.i".;;
~'''i'
l
!
j
legend
,-' NelS~'l'lCC(l P~
. it~<<~ Qa~
comml.\'\ttj ?a.~
\)jlGe,'elt>~ Parts
S"JiooJ ;;ne . I
. i
\in'~~ agre~rnents for ~,.
re:rstcf, use.
;...
__~___<lf,1'
"'''''''-
_.
;'(
11
Urban Development Pattern
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
The Collier Grov.1h Management Plan contains specified policies, such as Policy 5.3 and Policy 5.6 of the
Future Land Use Element, which promote development within the urban designated areas. The GMP has
not designated an Urban Grov.1h Boundary, but rather utilizes land use control and public expenditures as
the means to influence the County's development patterns. Additionally, the Future Land Use Map
(following page) has designated the western portion of the County as the Urban Mixed Use District, where
urban development and intensities are permitted and promoted. It should be noted from review of the
Future Land Use Map that 67 percent of the County's land area is designated as Conservation, owned
primarily by the State or the Federal government and therefore restricted from development. The area
between the Federal and State owned conservation land in the eastern portion of the County and the
urbanized area ofthe County to the west has been addressed with progressive planning strategies to balance
the property rights of the individual land ovroers and the sensitivity of the systems which depend upon the
area. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area are both examples of
land use regulations that were designed specifically to address urban sprawl and inefficiencies within the
potential pattern of development within the County. These Districts which were implemented at the time of
the County's last EAR and have resulted in approximately 59,571 acres to be set aside from development,
with 5,027 acres dedicated to compact urban development. Based upon this assessment, the current
strategy to influence the urban development pattern is being adequately addressed by the County.
'III . r .., 1 rinEI ... Ii III
---
FUTURE LA.a UIE MAP
nnlllllll r~iiii
;n..-
tr-- ................
o _WC'I'"
II...... ~..........
[$ __.........-:r
.-...-.
:r'--''':''''==-'
....... ... -....... ....."
.1lII'IIIIIl.oo
D :l:S'IIiloO.W....
lIIIlllil'\W....
......-.......-...........,
e------
~_........
~&.~-
.~..lIIiLo._
1II:::I5':l1;;-
0--
lIIISSI:III!I:"__,
'Ill
'nl
.
Ct>o!*l ~'-:~1"tf fi4"<<;.:'JI
t
..
::
..
..
..
..
'....
..
.
..
..
;
..
.
=
..
.
..
.
..
q
. ." .... ... .It ..
..
12
Urban Development Pattem
.-11I11
'''11"1
......---,
1
..I
~l
-\
I
J
:1
,
,
.J
I
--
m....._
.-----
o !:!lI1L:,:IU'A""
.......,. ........
----...-.
~~a="
-...............
l:Ha...';:.... -,.
o ;:w.-.......
ra ;;:a..~-
-,-
e=.-.:.:-......
II==~---
--....
0--
r1: ........
11--
0-....,... .......
61-----
Lj-----
o --
:::B'1.&.
0--
;:.-:===-~
.. .................
;t--............
S ..............
E1~
...... ... ....
11lIl~-:a...
..
..
..
.
As noted, the Urban Development Pattern has a direct bearing upon the infrastructure and services provided by
the County and the cost of providing that infrastructure and services. As development moves further away from
existing development a percentage of the cost of extending that infrastructure falls upon the County.
Understanding this cost ramifications, the FLUE is designed to provide incentives (higher density, wider
arrangement of land uses, lower infrastructure development cost) to the development community to promote
utilize existing urban designated land before Agricultural/Rural designated land. The regulatory allowances for
the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) District both
have provision within the District's that require that the urban development (the villages and towns) allowed for
in the District arc required to establish fiscal neutrality to the County in regards to provision of services against
impact fees generated and property tax collected.
In addition to economic impact associated with the County's Urban Development Pattern, social and
environmental impacts are related to the County's development pattern. As noted above, as development moves
outward and consumes more undeveloped land, the natural environmental systems are impacted, from natural
habitat for listed species to flood plain management, to water quality, to a number of natural systems; the
presence of urbanized development has the potential to disrupt natural systems. It was ba.<;ed upon this
recognition that the County in 2003 and 2004 adopted the RLSA and the RFMUD to better manage the
development patterns within the areas of the County outside of the Urbanized designated area and adjacent to
federally and state protected conservation lands. Again, it cannot be understated that 67 percent of all land area
within Collier County is protected from urban development. The RLSA and the RfMUD, the areas that buffer
these conservation lands were design to attain the appropriate balance between environmental protection,
agricultural protection and property rights. The progranls are both design to preserve a much greater area than
they entitle and require the concentration of development to occupy a much reduced foot print of impact within
these Districts and further ensure a greater degree of protection to the natural systems,
In regard to social impact, Urban Development Patterns have the potential to create unintended consequences to
a Community and its sense of place. Increased accessibility tends to increa..<;:e overall economic
opportunity and productivity, providing for increa<;:ed social equity. Workers have a larger pool of
potential jobs; employers have a larger pool of potential workers; there are more education options;
professionals have more opportunities to share information; businesses have more potential customers;
and increased competition forces businesses to improve service quality. Increased accessibility tends to
reduce transportation costs to individual consumers, businesses and regional economies, providing
economic development benefits.
Figure 2
Urbanization Impact On Mode Split (Lmvtoll, 2001)
100%
80%
Ih
~
..:: 600/0
...
...
:::
Q) 40%
t)
...
Q)
0..
20%,
Dear
0%
. Transi
Least Urban
Moderately Urban
Urban Index Rating
Most Urban
The portion of trips made b,1 transit and walkmg increase as (m area becomes m01'e urbani::ed,
13
Urban Development Pattern
As noted, urban environments tend to reduce per capita motor vehicle use and increase non-motorized
travel (see graph on previous page). These travel impacts provide a variety of economic, social and
environmental benefits, including reductions in total transportation costs, per capita traffic accidents,
energy consumption and pollution emissions, and increases physical fitness and public health. Urban
environments designed for walking and social interactions also tend to increase the quality of
relationships among people in a community, as indicated by increased opportunities of positive
interactions, the number of neighborhood interactions, and their sense of community connections,
particularly among people of different economic classes and social conditions. As a result, urban
environments are more equitable than automobile-dependent suburban and rura1land use patterns that
isolate non-drivers and increase transportation costs.
In addition to the adoption of the RLSA and the RFMUD Overlays, the GMP in the Urbanized Area,
through numerous policies, promotes the mixing of land uses and bringing goods and services within
close proximity to residential units. The primary intent of the existing Mixed Use activity Centers
(map provided on the following page) is to concentrate the most intense land uses at the confluence of
major roadways and bring goods and services to closer proximity to surrounding residential units.
. - .
... -........ \ I
\.1 ~. ~ ;y
;.
'\ i. /' -----r- -
. .. ~
-
- \~- /..- .. ~
c \\;1 .
... . t- .. /1..
~ c-__..
I--' . , -0:: .::J
~I .. .
: r':' ... ~ 1 .. .~
_ 1- r=:::: CA "&0. . V..
~oo - ..,
l:" - \.. J........:,- .. ..,. :. .
\. L .~~ I ~ ._ .
lJ~ ~ tr-' ~
t _~ .. " p_ _. ,.
\PI ~ I. )~- oo""L.... ~~4.._.'
__ _ . ._...-CIIAII_ ,~ , ~
~~ ~. ~ t1 - .. .. ~ - :oo I . .
~..... \\- ~:--.-. r . ~l"- tJ."
...J. ' . ~" .' '. ~i'o.... I
~~'f.~~. ~
~. .":~~ ~ - i - ...' oo"""
~
c:::
r-
~
-
. c
~
...
~
lW'J
>c:
?i
c
-
a
....
.
....~-..............,&S.~
---
~...- ~~ ..,."
....--. - :c:r=ec- 11<1. ~
... ..... .........
.
....
. - .
:,
f---J
Ul---T- ~ .
~l : I: ..
~.-~.,'...
I . I .. r- /'u
~....J
.
...
-oe
...
.
/f-.":
c::
.
-
-
.
- I
. I - I
\: -,~- OOr-'o~~_,-.-~ - I . l -
\. ~ 1 . tJ . ~ p- . . I. .
\. ... _ ._..- f--
, . _ i r-- /~ . / . ~ it.
l c.A __ r I.-: c.... .... :i
J J ___~ \...:.J. '-:- . .
>.-
.
.
--I--- -
- .. I
-~'I
.. ..
I
.
......
..., ./1/' .L -~. ..-
..., .......
. .. .. . -
.
.
...
-
.
...
~~~~-............~ ~
~--..;._~~~.N_
. - .
. - .
14
Urban Development Pattern
Additionally, the Activity Centers are designed by policy to promote a mix of residential and
commercial uses within the same project. While the private development community has not
responded to the regulatory allowances for mixed use or neo-traditional development in the majority of
the Activity Centers, Activity Center Number Five in 2005 through Ordinance 05-58 provided for the
development of the "Mercato". The development is a true mixed use project on 53 acres with 175
multifamily units and 470,000 square feet of commercial development. The same year the Town of
Ave Maria was approved on 5,027 acres with 1,383,500 square feet of commercial and 11,000
residential units, with a portion of each contained within neo-traditional mixed use development. In
addition to these traditional mixed use developments, the FLUE contains provisions for Planned Unit
Developments to provide for commercial opportunities to service the basic needs of the residential
units the PUD provide.
Conclusion
It should be noted that during this EAR evaluation, the Objectives and Policies to promote infill and
redevelopment in the Urban Designated area of the County have been analyzed for their effectiveness
in promoting infill and redevelopment, not only to address the issues described within the Urban
Development major issue, but also address climate change, green house gas emission and
maximization of existing infrastructure, which results in a corresponding maximization of public
expenditure.
Keith T. Lawton (2001), The Urban Structure and Personal Travel: an Analysis of Portland, Oregon Data and Some
National and International Data, E-Vision 2000 Conference (www.rand.org/scitech/stpilEvisionlSupplement/lawton.pdt).
15
Urban Development Pattern
Intergovernmental Coordination
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the GMP for their assessment on the coordination
between Collier County and the surrounding local governments. Specifically, the assessment of
the effectiveness in coordinating the planning and provision of potable water.
ISSUE BACKGROUND
The Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) is the portion of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP) that contains the County's Goal, Objectives and Policies with regard to
relations between the County and non-County governmental entities (as well as quasi-
governmental entities, including utility companies). Coordination between the Collier County;
the South Florida Water Management District; and various private utilities in regard to the
planning and provision of potable water is of outmost importance in meeting future potable water
demands in a sustainable manner.
Collier County is served by four Public Sector Water Systems, including the County, the City of
Naples, Everglades City, and the City of Marco Island. The County is further subdivided into the
Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD) and the Goodland Water Sub-District.
In addition to the Public Sector Water Systems, Collier County is served by four Non- Public
Sector Water Systems including the Immokalee Water and Sewer District (IWSD), the Florida
Governmental Utility Authority (Golden Gate) (FGUA), the Orange Tree Utility Company
(OTUC), and the Ave Maria Utility Company (AMUC). There are also two Private Sector Water
Systems which include the Lee Cypress Water and Sewer Co-Op, Inc. and the Port of the Islands
Community Improvement District, along with numerous small capacity water systems that are
regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).
In anticipation of the rapid population growth and increasing water demands facing the State,
and the potential threats to both the economy and natural resources, the Legislature amended the
Florida Water Resources Act (Chapter 373, F.S.) in 1997. The amendment required the five
water management districts to initiate regional water supply planning in all areas of the State
where reasonable anticipated sources of water were deemed inadequate to meet year 2020
projected demands.
The purpose of water supply planning is to develop strategies to meet future water demands of
urban and agricultural uses, while taking into consideration impacts on natural resources and the
environment. This process identifies areas where historically used sources of water potentially
will not be adequate to meet future demands, and evaluates several water source options to meet
the potential shortfall. As mandated by Florida water law, each regional water supply plan is
based on at least a 20-year future planning horizon, and a complete update of each plan is
required every five years.
1
Intergovernmental Coordination
Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has developed a long-term
comprehensive regional water supply plan update for its planning area. Collier County is within
the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Previous water supply plans for the Lower West
Coast were completed in February 1994 (planning horizon 201 0) and April 2000 (planning
horizon 2020), which the County utilized to develop its 2002 Water Master Plan Updatc. Thc
most recent water supply plan update is the 2005-2006 Lower West Coast Plan Update that has a
planning horizon of 2025.
In 2002 the Legislature expanded the local government comprchensive plan requirements,
known as Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, to strengthen coordination of water supply
planning and local land use planning. One of the most significant rcquirements was a Ten-Year
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan in order to project the local government's needs for at least a
10-year period, identify and prioritize the watcr supply facilities and sources of water that will be
needed to meet those needs, and include in the local government's Five- Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements the capital improvements identified as needed for the first five years. Until the
adoption of the County's lO-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the County's Water
Master Plan was considered the County's official plan for water capital improvements and the
basis for the 5-year Capital Improvement Schedule contained in the Capital Improvement
Element.
Lower West Coast Planning Area Map
2
Intergovernmental Coordination
Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration
On February 25, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners adopted an update to the County's
2001 Water Master Plan, to provide an integrated approach for meeting the projected water
system demands up to the year 2022. The "2002 Water Master Plan Update" provided for
comprehensive overview of the entire water system, including emergency systems, water
demand projections and demands and proposed conservation and reclaimed water projects, and
provided a plan for future water supply and infrastructure needs to meet the requirements of
growth, infrastructure renewal, replacement and enhancement over a course of five years. This
plan utilized population projections prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning
Department that were approved at that time by the Florida Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) and accepted by the SFWMD. Water demands were provided at five-year increments to
be consistent with the 2000 Lower West Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The 2002 Water
Master Plan Update formed the foundation for the proposed County's Ten-Year Water Supplies
Facilities Work Plan.
During the State of Florida's 2005 legislative session, lawmakers revised state water law to
include a new statutory provision. Local governments within the Lower West Coast Planning
Area are required to prepare a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that identifies water
supply projects, and adopt revisions to comprehensive plans within 18 months following the
approval of the 2005-2006 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update.
On January 25, 2007, as part of the 2004 EAR-based amendments, and in preparation of the
anticipated Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, Collier County adopted language to
coordinate water supply planning with SFWMD. Modifications of various Goals, Objectives and
Policies (GOPs), as required by these legislative actions, were addressed through the GMP
amendment to the Potable Water Sub-Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element
and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. The amendments referenced the 2002 Water
Master Plan Update and any subsequent updates as the appropriate document for the County's
water supply planning. The SFWMD's Governing Board approved the 2005-2006 Lower West
Coast Water Supply Plan Update on July 12,2006. Therefore, Collier County had to adopt GMP
text amendments that references a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by January 12,
2008 (or 18 months after the District Governing Board approved each regional water supply
plan) [so 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.].
Collier County adopted its lO-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan on February 24,2009, by
Ordinance No. 09-04 (DCA 09-RWSP). The adopted plan, and any subsequent updates, has
become the County's appropriate document for water supply planning.
Policy 1.7 of the Potable Water Sub-Element was specifically amended to incorporate by
reference the adopted lO-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. Furthermore, the Potable
Water Sub-Element (PWSE) of the Collier County's GMP requires coordination with the
SFWMD's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Specifically, Objective 1 of the PWSE states:
"The County shall locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of
the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of
Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable
water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be based
upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's Ten-Year Water
3
Intergovernmental Coordination
Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration
Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated annually), the Collier County Water-Sewer Master
Plan, and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida Water
Management District. "
In addition, Policies 1.4; 1.5; 1.6; and 1.7 of the PWSE specifically require coordination with
SFWMD's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan.
In regard to the County's coordination with other public and private utilities, Policy 3.3 of the
Potable Water Sub-Element states that "The Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1
are the minimum criteria for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water
supply facilities." Further Objective 3 states, "Pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including
any amendments thereto, Collier County has implemented procedures to ensure that at the time a
development order is issued, potable water facility capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum
Level of Service Standards established herein is available or will be available to serve the
development under the guidelines established for concurrency in the Capital Improvement
Element of this Plan." Also, Policy 1.4 of the ICE states that_the County will coordinate its
adopted level of service standard within the parameters allowed by the Concurrency
Management System of the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. In this regard, Collier
County coordinated with other utilities as part of the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
process. By selecting LOSS greater than the LOSS identified in Policy 3.1, FOUA and IWSD are
guaranteeing that they will meet Objective 3 when development orders are brought forward in
their service areas. The 60 gpcd LOSS selected by OTUC reflects the fact the utility only
provides for the potable water needs of its customers. Irrigation needs are met via individual
wells and community irrigation systems that are supplied by on-site lakes. In the adopted 10-
Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the LOSS for determining future demand for OTUC
was taken as 100 gpcd.
An important aspect of the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan amendment process is the
fact that Collier County strives in coordinating with all pertinent utilities. However, the County
does not have the authority to force private and investor owned utilities to adopt the LOSS in
Policy 3.1. Rather the LOSS are a guide by which Collier County can determine the concurrency
of future development proposed in the service area of each utility. Therefore, no plan
amendments that would require private and investor owned utilities to adopt the LOSS in Policy
3.1 are anticipated as part of the EAR based amendments. Nevertheless, and as stated in the
above referenced policies, Collier County intends to continue to maintain coordination with the
various private utilities that serve the unincorporated areas of the County to the greatest extent
possible while taking into consideration the limitations of the County's regulatory authority
allowed with respect to these utilities.
The County's IO-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan includes the list of water supply
facilities and all of the alternative water supply projects that it has developed since the early
1990's and plans to continue to develop over the next 10 years. The IO-Year Water Supply
Facilities Work Plan contains data that show the sheer volume of water that is generated by
alternative water supply projects as compared to traditional freshwater projects. As noted in the
IO-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the County is capable of delivering up to 68.1 MOD
of alternative water supply to its customers compared to only 24 MOD from traditional water
supplies. Based on the projects identified in the adopted IO-Year Water Supply Facilities Work
4
Intergovernmental Coordination
Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration
Plan, by 2018, Collier County projects to generate a ratio of 84.35 MGD of alternative water
supply and only 25.25 MGD from traditional sources.
The County' strives to use alternative water sources whenever feasible, and is proud to be one of
the leading County public utilities that have adopted alternative water supplies as a way of life
and is considered a leader in alternative water supplies in the State of Florida.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
The Collier County Growth Management Plan contains policies that require the coordination
between the Collier County; the South Florida Water Management District; and all private held
or investor owned utilities, as well as the need of a water supply plan that specifies strategies to
meet future water demands of urban and agricultural uses, while taking into consideration
impacts on natural resources and the environment. In addition the GMP contains policies that
require all pertaining utilities to be consistent with the level of service standards (LOSS) that are
identified in the County's CIE
5
Intergovernmental Coordination
Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration
'L~_....Q.J:L UA- lnl( Q.f..
l/311"
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191. FLORIDA
STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Chapter 163.3191 (I), Florida Statutes (2010). requires each local
government, as part of the continuous and ongoing comprehensive planning process, to prepare
every seven (7) years an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) has designated the Collier
County Planning Commission (CCPC) as the local planning agency pursuant to Chapter
163.3174, Florida Statutes. to conduct the evaluation and appraisal process of the Growth
Management Plan and to prepare reconunendations regarding the adoption of an EAR prior to
the submittal to the DCA; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) held an EAR
workshop on August 11,2010; lUld
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held EAR workshops on
August 25, 2010 and August 27, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the EAC held a public hearing on November 3, 2010 and made its
recommendation of approval of the EAR to the BCC; and
WHEREAS, the Cnllier County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
December 7, 20]0 and made its recommendation of approval ofthc EAR to the BCe.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1) Thc Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts the EAR and approves the
transmittal of the adopted EAR of the Collier County Growth Management Plan
for sufficiency review to the DCA; and
2) 'OlC Board of County Commissioners requests that DCA review the Collier
County EAR and issue a tinding of sufficiency; and
3) County staff is directed to prepare the EAR-based amendments and submit them
lor review by the Collier County Planning Commission and appropriate advisory
Page 1 of 2
halu81ion and Appraisal Repon 20 II
bodies to enable transmittal of the EAR-based amendments within 18 months
after the EAR is determined to be sufficient by DCA.
This Resolution adopted this _day of
majority vote.
, 2011 atler motion, second and
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
By:
By:
. Chairman
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
,1(rx0 ~\0
'C \,0
Heidi Ashton-Cicko \ 1-
Assistant County Attorney
Section Chief, Land Userrransportation
CPIIO-CMP-00787\J
Page 2 of 2
Evalualion and Appraisal Report 2011
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE
!
z
~
:;
Q
..
..
is.
"
z
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO
CONSIDER RESOLUTION
.
Notico is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Monday, January 31,
2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor, Col-
lier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to con~
sider adoptidn of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence
at 9:00 A_M
..
..
Jil
.,;
..
~
5
..
~
."
=
o
==
.
<
o
..
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to for-
ward to the Florida Department of Community Affairs the adoption
of the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR.) to the Growth
Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING TO THE 2011 EVALUATION
AND APPRAISAL REPORT ON THE COI:.L1ER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ADOPTING THE EAR AND APPROVING THE
TRANSMITIAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of
the proposed amendment are available for inspection at the Land
Deveiopment Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na-
ples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should
be dil-ected to the Land Development Services Department, (239-252-
2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development Services
Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, will be read and
considered at the public hearing.
Co1ller County
FlorIda
\~.1
p
f--
a
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County
Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter consid-
ered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceed-
ing, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim re-
cord of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in
order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to
you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the'Collier
County Facilities Management Department. located at 3335 Tamiami
Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least
two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hear-
ing impaired are available in the Board 01 County CommissiO[lers Of-
fite_
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Is/Patricia Morgan Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
NQ,j;F.BJ85075
Januarv 10 2011
EAR PROCESS - SUMMARY AND FOLLOWUP OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED COMMENTS
November 30, 2010
W. James Flanagan III
SHORTFALLS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE EAR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
PROCESS
The following observations and suggestions are for improving the public involvement of the EAR process. These
suggestions result from concerns that the public needs certain background infonnation to effectively participate in an
evaluation and assessment of Goals, Objectives and Policies of our GrO\vth Management Plan through the EAR
process.
1. SUMMARIZE AND SIMPLIFY THE VOLUME OF Il'<'FORMATION:
Recognizing the sometimes overwhelming volume of information, components, and Goals, Objectives and Policies
contained within the Growth Management Plan, the public is asked to evaluate the performance of the Growth
Management Plan through the EAR Process with little advance information, guidance or preparation.
2. CREATE A BASIS OF MEASUREMENT AND ASSESSMENT:
Provide a more effective means for public evaluation by providing a means of measurement, basis of evaluation, and
components of evaluation for the specific Goals Objectives and Policies of the Growth Management Plan presented
within the EAR Process.
3. FRAME THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE MAJOR ISSUES AND ELEMENTS:
Provide an overview of the Growth Management Plan and relating them to the appropriate Goals, Objectives and
Policies when framing the Major Issues within the Growth Plan Elements and relating them to the Growth
Management Plan when presenting the subjects to the publlc.
4. IMPROVE STAFF ALLOCATIONS OF PUBLIC COMMENTS WITHIN THE GMP
Public comments labeled "Observational", "Programmatic", and "GGA1\1P Restudy" - many of these comments are
public observations of problems and concerns within the GMP and are not effectively tied to specific Goals,
Objective and Policies. The larger concern deserves addressing within the EAR process.
5. NEED FOR EFFECTIVE AND MEASUREABLE JOB GROWTH ELEMENT
Job growth could be introduced as a specialized element within the GMP as means for development to insure self-
sustaining broad level employment growth for the growth-created populations. The Economic Element does not
provide the framework or requirement for job creation relative to growth with any specificity - it "supports" all
efforts and aspects yet without goals or measurable achievement.
6. RE-EVALUATION AND/ORRECONSIDERATION OF PLANNED EASTERN POPULATIONS
Population expansion in the Eastern Lands and their effect on the rest of the County may need to be revisited,
evaluated for successes and failures and discussed frankly. The measure of success of Ave Maria and other planned
communities relative to the attraction of their location, financial viability. and sustainability should be evaluated on
a periodic basis for both Eastern Developments and the County as a whole, and growth expansion policies for these
areas reconsidered if necessary.
7. REDUCEIELIMINTE EFFECTS OF POLITICIZED DECISION-MAKING
Political efforts that circumvent the Growth Management Plan undermine the validity and comprehensive success of
the plan. Such efforts also cloud the transparency of the process and ultimately undermine the public trust of
government.
8. CONNECT THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN TRANSPORTATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Road decisions and planning are made in the MPO and Long Range Transportation Plans are reflective of "approved
DRl's only". Transportation Planning through the MPO does not address future populations, future land uses, and
current conditions such as the RLSA, where most of the future population of Collier County is projected to exist.
This is evident from the 1-75 Interchange effort, the widening of Oil Well Road, the lack of road systems projected
and shown within the RLSA on the 2035 LRTP Plan, and the east-west corridors ending just east of DeSoto Blvd at
the RLSA lands. Infrastructure for future growth is being funded by today's taxpayers, and concurrency is not
functioning in a practical or fair manner.
9. MAINTAIN PRIVATE WATER AND SEWER IN THE ESTATES
MinimizelEliminate the drive to urbanize the rural lands.
10. CREAT RURAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (VS. URBAN STANDARDS)
Recognize that rural lifestyle and issues should not be held to generally urban standards.
11. CAUTION AGAINST A MASTER MOBILITY PLAN AS PARALLEL GROWTH MGMT PLAN.
Like the Transportation Planning System of the MPO, without conjoining Master Mobility Planning with the GMP
and the LDC, disconnects will happen and comprehensive processes will be diluted and disjointed.
PUBLIC COMMENTS REVIEW - EAR ADOPTION RESOLUTION
Upon review of the public comments within the EAR Adoption Resolution as posted on the website, I find that
public comments from the March 15, 2010 Public Meeting were added subsequent to the County's website posting
of the March 15,2010 public comments (copy of same printed April 21, 2010). These comments should not be a
revision of hi story of a public meeting, and should be identified as additional comments, separated by their source
and date of submission. As well regarding these added comments, separation ofRFMUD and RLSA
issues/comments is recommended, as the reference to the intended program of the comments not unclear and
unintended consequences could result. Refer to Chapter One ~ Public Comments, March 15, 20 I 0, Eastern Lands
(RLSA-RFMUD) - all comments after "Engage Estates residents with eastern lands development. (Suggestion:
Number all public comments for ease of reference).
A review of public comments recorded during public workshops and those incorporated into the EAR Resolution
shows that the following comments were not reflected:
Urban Develooment Patterns:
1. Urban growth/Services Boundaries not established yet. Define and establish.
2. "A reference was made that Road corridors serving the urban areas should be routed around the rural areas
so as to maintain community character" Staff noted this item as a GGAJv1P Restudy item, yet the intent of
the discussion/comment was to mitigate and minimize roadway, traffic and population impacts ofRLSA
urbanized developments on surrounding rural communities and preserves. (IE previously proposed Big
Cypress Parkway and 1-75 Interchange to access Big Cypress).
3. "Plans for east of951 aren't flexible enough to accommodate change in growth rate" The thought on this
was East of 951 needs to have a comprehensive approach - RLSAJRFMUD/Estates/ImrnokaleelRural
Lands/ Ag LandslPreserves - and each cannot ignore the effects of localized Growth Management planning
on other communities. All communities need to be engaged in a comprehensive planning and review
process.
4. Provide Bonus Density for urban infill development.
TransDortation
1. Road Systems are being proposed that bi-sect rural Golden Gate Estates to sexve the urbanized RLSA and
Eastern Lands. Other alternatives are necessary to mitigate the transportation, traffic and population impact
on the rural community and character of Golden Gate Estates.
Eastern Lands - RLSA-RFMUD
1. County should be studying impacts ofRLSA potential development and their effects on Estates (i.e.
Transportation, Traffic, quality oflife, environmental impacts, flood impacts, wetlands mitigation, water
quality, water quantity) Address current and future costs to the Countv/taxDaver associated with urban
develooment in existine rural/amculturallconservation low density low use Eastern Lands)
2. CountylRLSA needs to engage Estates and surrounding communities in planning process. Issues need to be
addressed comprehensively countywide and not exclusively within the RLSA area/process. Serious
Concerns have been raised about the effects of the projected 400,00 people in the RLSA east of DeSoto
Blvd on EstateslImmokalee/Collier County.
3. LRTP not showing RLSA Transportation projections, however population projections exist for the RLSA.
RLSA FLUE Map missing from County web site, yet referenced by note on the County's FLUE Map
currently posted on website.
Affordable Housing:
1. Promote equitable distribution of affordable housing throughout Collier County. Address saturation rates of
affordable housing relative to economic condition. current and future.
Other Comments made but not reflected:
1. CAT bus system doesn't serve/access Collier County Beaches.
2. Library hours insufficient.
This concludes a review of public comments from public workshops of the EAR incorporated into the EAR
Resolution in advance ofthe Adoption ofthe EAR Resolution to be heard before the Collier County Planning
Commission on December 16,2010.
...
aI
Cl
'tl ~
:l Q
aI lIlZ ~
f-::::l <(
Q, 80 IU
0 >-U :c
.c 00u.. ~
] 000 ~ z
.. 30 ... ....
~ .....I oc . <( IU
.....1<1:5;: :r aI
<l:Ow U t
f-002 IU
.!!! <l:Wf- :r IU
IIoc I- @
~ f-f-<I:
lIll9o.. > ::I
=h: Q, WZW .... \I]
\I] oc~o Z IU
Slf){j) a :r
E .. alGo Ul I-
III
:i wocOC Ul e
CI) ocOO w
g' ,0 U ~
010I 7<1:W Q ~
~ N oc Q a
.... r-C. 0'0 <( Q!
'"" >: of-Z
10 aI ~o<l: e Q.
Q, aI
'"C ~ .c Otlll :E:
... Z W IU a
a <l:2!; ~
c: Cl <( ~
c ~ LI)~Z
CI) :i:l .....I~ Q
8l 9f-2 Z Q
: goo <( ~
:E: oZoc <(
aI. Nf-<I: I!! a
~ w::::lO Z aI
uoooo W IU
.- Z 19'W :E: ~
u
..... Ul <l:ZI :E:
Ul ~I--II- Z
IU OOf- a
~ oc::::l<l: U ....
> Q odo ::I Ul
Q <(
>-ZOC ~ ....
<( a:a e.. <( Q
...I 01ll1iS ~ IU
~ ww a ~
oEw
c( Z I IL
w>f- Ul IL
W 260 w a
<I: f- l- t
...I lIl<l:>.:: ::I
<l:l9oc Z IU
U .... ....
(Yl'Z W :E: IU
LI)~...J
I- ,>-u '"" ....
(YlOOW M aI
OOOI ..... ~
Z OOf- w
N...J IU IU
~ . >- I
OZ!:; ~ ~
~<l:5 :c
I- z
Q. .. UZoc e a
.. Z~W
aI <l:l9f- :E:
W C ZZlIl Q
0 ~~~ IU ~
CI) :i:l 0l9l9 I- a
.-:l oc<l:W ... IL
~ IU :. ol9oc :E: Q
~ ~ Z ' ....
...... wVi' .... IU
Q Cl ZWoc w I-
...I c ::::lOCW ~ W
~ ....
Q. z :i:l OOZ <( Q.
C uu..o :E:
... aI W~ ::I
'-'" li:i w ~ ocOOlll a a
W 1Il
W :E: I-! .....J........... > u
:E: <( Q, ...J...J2 w
Z aI ...J<l:2 :3
~ OIO
UlIlU
Q.
...
QI
en j:: C
't:l
::s VlZ a:
ea f-=:> cl:
W
VlO ::t
c. ~u Cl
0 COLL
.::: COO a: Z
III 90 ... ...
~ cl: w
.. -.J e<: . ea
0 -.J<(f- ::t
;: <(OZ U I-
UJ U
f-COL w w
<(UJf- ::t ....
iij I Ie<: I- ea
'u f-f-<( ~ ::l
QI Vl19o.. III
~ C. UJZUJ Z W
III e<:~0 0 ::t
~VlVl
=:>VlO III l-
E .. ~ OUJe<: III 0
III UJe<:o W I-
eu :i e<:Ou a: a:
en _ 0 UJ C
..., ~ ~' ;!;j<(e<: C 0
" 60 ...
..... cl: a:
1 i.: of-Z 0 0.
'""' ~o<(
RJ QI " QI I- ::E:
"C c. .::: OUJVl w 0
~ ... zt~ a:
0 0
C <(L=:> cl: a:
en r;::j U""l~~
eu c 9f-L C c
:w z a:
en al (~ '0"00 cl:
,~ 8ze<: cl:
III 0
<I: ::E: Nf-<( I- ea
QI UJ=:>o Z
U I ucoco W w
.. I, Z -UJ ::E: ::t
iJ. <(19I I-
III zZf- ::E: z
"'" III ~~ 0
w 00f- ...
a: e<:=:><( u ~
c odo ::l
~ C >-ze<: ~ ...
> cl: co~<( C
0;;;'0 a: w
...I UJUJCO 0 ::t
oEUJ u. I-
0:: Z I III u.
UJ>f- 0
<I: LBO w
l- t
<( f- ::l
W Vl<(~ Z w
...I <(19e<: ... ..J
- Z UJ ::E: w
U M~-.J ..J
l{l>-U '""'
~ MCOUJ M ea
oCOI "'" i:!:
~ OOf- W
N-.J W W
Z . >- I a: ::t
ozt ::t I-
~\ ~ Z<(s I- Z
UJ
--- ......J i.: UZe<: e 0
_____ ...-J z~UJ ::E:
CL. QI <(19f- C
c ZZVl a:
~j 0 ~~~ w 0
W :w 01919 I:;
e<:<(UJ u.
1-- :w
~ ~ ,:j QI 019e<: ::E: C
w j::Z--'::' ... W
<I: ~ ::E: 0. UJVl ..J I-
-
w .,/ en zUJe<: w W
W C I:;'.J c =:>e<:UJ a: ..J
Cl :w OOZ cl: 0.
...I z C!i C uLLO ::l ::E:
s: UJ~ 0
CL. ... e<:COVl 0
I- Z W QI w ..1:a > u
-........ w w ::E: .. ~::::J:E w
w Cl cl: c. -.J<(L U
::E: cl: z ~ OIO :5
UVlU 0.