Loading...
Agenda 01/31/2011 S (EAR) BCC SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 2011 EV ALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT ADOPTION HEARING JANUARY 31,2011 ~ SPECIAL AGENDA JANUARY 31, 2011 9:00 a.m. Growth Management Plan 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR.) Adoption Hearing Fred W. Coyle, BCC Chainnan Commissioner, District 4 Georgia Hiller, BCC Commissioner, District 2 Jim Coletta, BCC Vice Chainnan, District 5, CRAB Vice-Chainnan Donna Fiala, BCe Commissioner, District 1, CRAB Chainnan Tom Henning, BCe Commissioner, District 3 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53, AS AMENDED, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS." ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. 1 January 31 , 2011 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (Adoption Hearing) 3. Adjourn INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 239,252-2387 2 January 31 , 2011 Collier County 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR - BCC Adoption Edition January 31 ,1011 . . r ... 1 .... '''1 --- FUIUII LAID UII .AP C.......C<lllnl)oF_. ~::~.~~~~-: I ... ... .... [ J 'M' [ 1111 MIa... '1___ 0--- 1l!I--__ w---- ="...-:..-=..- ==-.:=.=.-==. I~- . -... e""==-=-- ~'- i5iE- ~:::5;:-- _____ ~1lII-'-- D~ -=___ 1]-- .......- :~----- ;tl~~~-_.,.-=-"t::_.__ I "" I -- 1==--==- :!!ll&a.'.a..... --- ~~;~- tJ"''II!~-'" ii~-- .... I i---- m-- o --- :,::-== - ..~---- >f---_ :::1.........._ .- - :oC__ II......_~ -- : , . '" . r . . . r . t: . . r . . .!!::?.~~---- . . . J I I .... I ----_._~- ',' v - . "i<C ~ >< ~ o o J . ..- - . . r . o . .. .rf. ... ------- - I~ -"~r! . ~~:=.:.r'"5 -- ~__.!_.~.~__L _I II i .... .n. In, 1'1' ... I lnl 101 .... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommend that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve a resolution adopting the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for snfficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan. OBJECTIVE: That the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve a resolution adopting the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for sufficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan, CONSIDERATIONS: The periodic amendment process, which occurs once every seven years, as described in Chapter 163.3191, F.S., is a two-phase process referred to as the Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR). The EAR evaluates the performance of the various Elements of the local government comprehensive plan since the previous EAR-based amendments. It assesses the successes and shortcomings of the various Goals, Objectives, and Policies included within the GMP and designates Objectives and Policies which need revisions, modifications or deletions. Additionally, the EAR is the primary means by which the local plan can respond to changes in federal, state or regional planning requirements. It should be noted that for the 2004 to 2010 evaluation period for the 2011 EAR, there have been 57 GMP amendments processed by the County. While not all of these amendments were sent to the Department of Community Affairs for adoption, they were either publicly or privately submitted for processing and evaluation. A fact that recognizes the contemplation on the County's part of what improvements are need to assure the GMP is an effective blueprint for guiding future growth, but also accentuates the need for the comprehensive review of the GMP to ensure there is agreement within the Plan's individual elements. Ultimately, the Objectives and Policies designated for adjustment in the EAR become the basis of proposed amendments to the local government comprehensive plan, the second phase of the process. These EAR-based amendments, as reviewed by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) and Planning Commission (PC), and subsequently adopted by the BCC, after found in compliance with the Chapter 163, Part 11, F.S., then become part of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the GMP until the next EAR is prepared in seven years. The adoption of the EAR is the first part of a two prong process, during which areas of the GMP are evaluated for their effectiveness and if appropriate designated for adjustment or change. The exact specificity of that change is not determined during this first prong of the process, only that a change is needed within the various Elements, Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the GMP. Post adoption of the EAR by the BCC is when the specifics of the changes called out for in the EAR are composed and refined through the GMP EAR amendment adoption process. The County will have eighteen months from the date or the EAR adoption by the BCC to adopt the changes Page 11 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing designated by the EAR. Understanding this bifurcated process provides a clear direction for what is being asked of the EAC during the EAR workshop. At the completion of the EAR August workshops (EAC - August II and CCPC August 25 & 27), staff presented the post workshop EAR books to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and the various other state reviewing agencies. In late October the County received the review comments which have been attached as exhibit "A" to the CCPC staff report within the EAR Adoption book. The majority of the comments from the DCA focus upon the need for further data and analysis regarding the major issues and their inter-relationship to the specific goals of the GMP's various elements, as well as the effectiveness of the elements as they relate to the major issues. The BCC EAR Adoption books have been updated to address the specific comments contained in the courtesy review letters. In lieu of a lengthy summary of the changes made to the EAR draft document, a summary memo of the proposed changes has been provided (Exhibit "A") for review and consideration. Please note that staffhas modified the EAR in other areas to provide additional clarity, but the summary memorandum only addresses modifications of substantive nature. ORGANIZATION OF THE EAC-EAR ADOPTION BOOK: The presented 2011 EAC- EAR book is organized into a single-bound report containing an introduction and three (3) major chapters. These chapters are: Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified Chapter Two - Countywide Assessment Chapter Three -Evaluation of Major Issues Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified details the issues that were brought to the process from the public during the "Public Participation" portion of the EAR process. Chapter Two - Countywide Assessment is the individual review of each Element and Sub-Element of the GMP and the Goals, Objectives and Policies that comprise each of those Elements or Sub- Elements. Chapter Three - Evaluation of Major Issues are the issues agreed upon between the County and the DCA. Chapter One and Chapter Three are both connected within Chapter Two. (Bolded for emphasis) Within each Element reviewed within Chapter Two, staff has referenced Objectives and Policies that are directly related to Chapters One and Three. For example a public comment that is directly linked to Policy 1.6.1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE) will be recognized within Chapter Two, as well as Chapter One. Additionally, Objectives and Policies that are directly related to a major issue will be specified within Chapter Three, as well as within the Elcment review contained within chapter Two. As described above the structure of the EAR inter-relates all of the chapters contained in the report. Within each of these elements, the pertinent comments from the workshops and adoption hearings with the EAC and the CCPC have been applied to the related objective or policy, to provide identification of both bodies' perspective, as well as comments offered by the general public. Unlike the EAR workshop edition books, the EAR adoption edition does not contain the evaluation of every policy and objective within the GMP, but rather only the objective and policies within the various elements in which modifications are being suggested are included. It Page 12 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing should be noted that within a few policies the CCPC and the EAC have taken differing positions, these areas will be highlighted during the EAR adoption hearing and will be presented to the BCC for [mal arbitration on the issue. These policies are highlighted in Exhibit "B" of the executive summary. FISCAL IMPACT: County staff undertook the preparation of the EAR in-house. The Comprehensive Planning Department prepared the EAR with input and cooperation from numerous county divisions and departments. Direct and indirect costs have not been calculated for the preparation of the EAR. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Pursuant to section 163.3 I 87(6)(a), Florida Statutes, "No local government may amend its comprehensive plan after the date established by the state land planning agency for adoption of its evaluation and appraisal report unless it has submitted its report or addendum to the land planning agency as prescribed by section 163.3191 ..." Therefore, timely action by the BCC adopting the EAR is necessary in order for the consideration of future comprehensive amendments. Otherwise, Collier County will be imposed with the aforementioned statutory sanction that would prohibit amending its comprehensive plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC): The recommendations by the EAC from its November 3, 2010 EAR adoption public hearing was for the BCC to adopt the 2011 EAR as modified by the EAC and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs. PLANNING COMMSSION RECOMMENDATION (CCPC): The recommendations by the CCPC from its December 7, 2011 EAR adoption public hearing was for the BCC to adopt the 2011 EAR as modified by the CCPC and transmit to the Department of Community Affairs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC); review the numerous changes recommended by the EAC and the CCPC, provide direction upon the individual polices in which there is conflicting recommendations from the EAC, CCPC and staff (exhibit "B") and approve a resolution adopting the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for sufficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in Section 163,3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan. Page I 3 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing Prepared By: ~ /? ~ Date: I - 0 ~ - II Michael Bosi, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Section Reviewed By: Date: T;o I - "4- - !.o I ( i iam D. Lorenz, r.. P.E" Director Land Development Services Department /:! Approved By: l~ I /- Date: Nick Casalan eputy Administrator Growth Management Division / ~ j-- / ( Page 14 Collier County 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Report BCC Adoption Public Hearing SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) EXHIBIT "A" Goals, Objective and Policies: All Elements will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County shall continue to,.." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: All Elements should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. ************************************************************************************ Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.4 Policy 1.5 Policy 2.10 Objective 3 Policy 3.1 Policy 4.1 Policy 4.2 Policy 4.6 Policy 4.7 Policy 5.1 - Revision to introduce reducing VMT and GHG emissions as criterion for further prioritizing projects; revision to provide another option/more options. - Revisions related to multi-Element revisions in a comprehensive effort to manage redundancy: revision related to 20]0 CIE adoption with "Regional Park land" LOSS change from 2.9 to 2.7 acres per I,OOO/population; revisions related to FOOT comments to the DCA. - Reconsider revision recommended that would allow for more-responsive fiscal management, as this Policy remains relevant and should not be changed. - Minor revision timeframe reference. - Minor revisions associated with new terminology. - Minor revision to provide updated Statutory cite. - Revision no longer necessary within context of EAR amendments; amendment to provide updated reference cite was made recently as part of 2010 CIE adoption (Ordinance No. 10-43). - Minor revisions associated with new terminology. - Minor revision to include an additional "best practices" entry. - Minor revisions associated with new terminology; may need minor revision to provide updated Statutory cite. Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Transportation Element Policy 3.3 - Modification to state corridor width evaluated on a case by case basis. Policy 3.4 - Policy 3.5 - Policy 4.1 Policy 4.6 Policy 5.1 - Policy 5.3 - Policy 5.4 - Policy 5.5 - Policy 5.6 - Policy 5.8 - Policy 5.9 Policy 6.3 ' Policy 6.5 ' Policy 6.6 - Policy 7.3 - Policy 7.4 - Policy 7.5 - Policy 9.3 - Policy 11.2 - Policy 12.8 - Objective13- Modifications to provide more flexibility in policy. Revision to eliminate time frame for achieving policy. Revision to be consistent with policy 4.3. Addition to policy to address HB697. Revision to provide clarification and applicability of policy. Modifications to provide expanded applicability of policy. Revision to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697. and 8B360. Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TDM strategies. Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TDM strategies and language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5. HB697. and 8B360. Modification to improve effectiveness of policy. Deletion based upon action accomplished. Revisions to provide clarity to policy. Revisions to update list of projects identified. Collier County shall encourage emergency egress be permitted at all temporary access facilities. (new) Modifications to expand applicability of policy. Modifications to recognize the requirement to implement HB697. Revision to recognize on-going efforts of the policy. Revision to provide clarity of policy. Revision to require the BCC review and approve the requested Airport Authority Master Plan. Deletion based upon transit systems exempt from concurrency. The County shall evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element in the Growth Management Plan. Public Facilities Element - Sanitarv Sewer Sub-Element Objective I - Minor revisions to provide new departmental references; reformatting. Policy 1.1 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 1.3 n Consider revision to set new review and reporting requirements. Policy 1.4 - May need an updated Ordinance cite. Policy 1.5 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 1. 7 - Minor revision to provide updated Ordinance cite. Objective 2 - Reformatting. Policy 2.1 - Minor revisions to reconcile figures and be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan; part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy. Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet Policy 2.4 - Minor revision to reference earlier Policy. Objective 3 - Reformatting. Policy 3.1 -- Revise/augment to introduce new Policy regarding private wastewater facilities. Objective 4 - Reformatting. Policy 4.7 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Objective 5 - Consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions; reformatting. Policy 5.3 - Minor revision to provide new agency reference; may need an updated/clearer Policy cite. Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element Goal Objective 1 Policy 1.1 Policy 1.3 Policy 1.5 Policy 1.6 Objective 2 Policy 2.1 Policy 2.4 Policy 2.5 Policy 2.6 Objective 3 Policy 3.] Policy 3.2 Policy 3.3 Policy 3.4 Objective 4 Policy 4.5 Policy 4.6 Objective 5 Revisions to reflect all that supplying potable water entails, and its interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub,Elements. Minor revisions and reformatting. Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Minor revision to provide additional specificity. Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Minor revision to provide additional specificity. Revision to strengthen this Policy language, be more inclusive and provide the desired clarity; reformatting. Minor revisions to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan, correctly reference an outside document, and provide additional specificity. Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Minor revision to recognize document updates. Minor revision to update Ordinance reference. Reformatting. Minor revisions to reconcile certain LOS standards; deleting an unnecessary statement; part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; revision to add Ave Maria facility and LOSS information; consider revision to introduce water pressures and water amounts as new measures of Levels of Service. Minor revision to abbreviate. Minor revision to abbreviate. - Minor revisions to abbreviate, and provide additional specificity; additional statement specifying review procedure; verify accuracy of agency names and identifications. Reformatting. Provide specificity if deemed necessary. Minor revision to eliminate redundant language in describing term used. Minor revision to provide new departmental reference; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Public Facilities Element - Draina2e Sub-Element Goal - Revisions to reflect all that stormwater management entails, and its interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting. Objective 1 - Minor revision to reflect GIS use; reformatting. Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Objective 2 Policy 2.1 Objective 3 Policy 3.4 Objective 4 Policy 4.1 Objective 5 Objective 6 Policy 6.] Policy 6.2 Policy 6.3 - Reformatting. - Part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; verify that "as amended" may be used in this context. Reformatting. Revision to provide the desired clarity. Reformatting, with consideration of minor revision to provide the emphasis suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). Revision to update document reference. Reformatting; verify that "as amended'. may be used in this context. Reformatting. with consideration of revisions to provide additional natural drainage feature protections in certain County projects. introducing new detention features and including filter marshes. as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). Verify that certain Federal and State standards would apply. with the proper agency protocols, whether or not rcfcrences are included to them. Minor revision to update document cite; revision to coincide with the increased water quality treatment requirement found in the CCME. Minor revision to update document cite; consideration of revisions to provide additional natural drainage feature protections, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). Public Facilities Element - Solid Waste Sub-Element Goal Objective 1 Policy I.I Policy 1.2 Policy ].4 Objective 2 Policy 2.4 Policy 2.5 Policy 2.8 Policy 2.]4 Policy 2.]8 Policy 2.24 Policy 2.25 Policy 2.28 Policy 2.30 Objective 3 Policy 3.2 Revision to incorporate guiding principles for solid waste management: reformatting. Minor revisions including reformatting. Minor revision to add explanatory details. Verify that "as amended" may be used in this context. Minor revision to add explanatory details. Reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies, as amended Revisions to remove mandate to complete a datc-specific task; consider alternate version for minor revision in reference to specific facility. Part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy. Revision to reduce levcl of specificity. - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to maintain effective debris clean-up plans. New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to study improved waste management techniques. New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to evaluate viability of recycling agricultural plastic films. New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to explore feasibility of expanding Immokalee transfer facility to provide additional services. New recommendation to add a Policy directing the County to assist other groups to establish recycling programs. New recommendation to add a Policy directing the County to encourage the construction of sustainable buildings. Minor revision, including reformatting. Minor revision to delete a parenthetical statement. Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet Policy 3.4 - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to encourage sustainable landscaping practices. Policy 3.5 New recommendation to add a Policy ensuring the County meets recent, Statutory recycling rate. Public Facilities Element - Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharee Sub-Element Goal Objective 1 Policy 1.1 Policy 1.2 Policy 1.5 Objective 2 Policy 2.2 Objective 3 Policy 3.3 Policy 3.5 Objective 4 Policy 4.1 Objective 5 Policy 5.5 - Revisions to reflect all that aquifer recharge area protection entails, and its interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting. - Revisions to extend time allowed to complete a periodic task; reformatting. - Minor revision. - Consider revision to identifY potable water wellfield locations in the greater lmmokalee area. - Consider revision to identifY department involved with preparing and utilizing the referenced publication; minor revision to update document cite; verify that "as amended" may be used in this context. - Reformatting. - Minor revision to update document cite. - Reformatting. - Consider revision to reflect coordinated monitoring efforts, and point out monitoring efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area. - Consider revision to point out efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area. - Reformatting. - Minor revision to reference another section in same document. - Revisions, including reformatting; removal of undefined term from further use in this Objective and its subsequent Policies, - Modify to reduce extent of specificity. Housine Element Objective 1 Policy 1.1 Policy 1.4 Objective 2 Policy 2.1 - Revise to reflect a new annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate. - Revise to reflect that the County presently has affordable-housing interlocal agreements with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island; and, add a requirement that the municipalities shall re-evaluate their respective interlocal agreements with the County every three years. - Revise to make consistent with Section 163,3177(1) l.g., Florida Statutes. - Modify to reflect the removal of the HDC reference and their stated mission; add the phrase "for- profit and not- for-profit providers of affordable-workforce housing" before the phrase, "shall assist Collier County... "; and, delete the references to "fifteen" percent and "1,000" units and replace with a new annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate. - Revise to remove agency reference, as it is no longer relevant. Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Policy 2.9 Policy 2.10 Policy 2.11 Policy 3.5 Policy 3.7 Objective 4 Policy 4.3 Policy 5.4 Policy 5.6 Policy 5.7 Objective 6 Objective 7 Objective 8 Policy 8.] Policy 8.2 Policy 8.3 Policy 8.6 Objective 9 Policy 9.] Policy 9.2 Policy 9.3 Policy 9.4 Policy 9.5 - Revise to reflect new timeline for task completion. - Revise to reflect departmental name change and Program addition. - Revise to replace a specific departmental reference with a general reference. - Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task. - Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task. - Revise to remove reference to City of Naples conducting survey. - Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task. - Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task. - Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task. - Revise date to coincide with the amended survey commission date to be established in. - Revise to delete the term. "group care facilities" and replace with the term, "group housing and Continuing Care Retirement Centers". - Revise to delete the term, "Urban Coastal Fringe" and replace with the term, "Coastal High Hazard Area". - Modify the Objective to remove the restriction that rehabilitated units must be located only in the lmmokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. and within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area. Modify to remove reference to '"non, conforming" residences to correlate with the lmmokalee Area Master Plan Element. - Delete. as Policy objective has been completed. - ModifY to reflect complction of survey and provide a reference that activities are ongomg. - Revise to remove second sentence of Policy. - Staff recommends creating a new Objective based on the 2009 adoption ofHB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies. - Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies. - Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies. - Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies. - Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies. - Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies. Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Policy 1.1.1 Policy 1.1.5 BCe. Policy 1.1.6 Modification based upon BCC action to adjust level of service from stated level. , Deletion based upon removal of facilities value as a level of service standard by the , Revision for clarification of the policy. Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Policy 1.3.1 - Revision to promote alternative transportation routes to County owned parks to promote Green House Gas reductions. Policy 1.4.1 - Policy 1.4.2 ' Policy 1.5.1 - Goal 2 Objective 2.1- Policy 2.1.1 - Policy 2.1.2 Policy 2.1.3 - Policy 2.1.4 - Policy 2.1.5 - Goal 3 - Objective 3.1- Policy 3.1.1 - Policy 3.1.2 - Policy 3.1.3 Policy 3.1.4 Policy 3.1.5 Policy 3.1.6 Policy 3.1. 7 Revision for clarification of the policy. Revision to eliminate list of governmental providers of recreational facilities. Revision of policy to include open space. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Modification and relocation based upon changes to treatment of neighborhood parks. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Revision based upon Goal 2 proposed deletion. Revision to reflect anticipated adoption ofthe Parks Master Plan. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renwnbering and elimination of asswnption of automatic cost mcreases. - Revision based on renumbering. , Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering and potentially on outcome of Parks Master Plan. Conservation & Coastal Manal!:ement Element Objective 1.1- Revise to reflect Program has been implemented and activities are ongoing. Policy 1.1.3 - Revise per EAC to address financial feasibility. Policy 1.1.6 - Revise to include an effective date. Objective 1.2- Revise per the EAC to address database provisions. Policy 1.2.3 - Modify to require that only watershed dependent data should be organized by watershed and sub-basin units; and revise per CCPC to include specific text. Policy 1.2.5 - Delete per staff as Policy is no longer relevant. Policy 1.3.1 - Revise per EAC to include correct acronyms. Policy 1.3.4 - Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant. Objective 2.1- Modify to reflect completed work and reword first sentence in item (c); and revise per EAC to add requirement that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the same drainage area. Policy 2.1.3 - Revise per EAC to include within the Policy measurement tools for determining improvements to the watersheds over time. Policy 2.1.6 - Revise per EAC to include within the Policy the use of watershed management plans Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet for ongoing data collection guidance. Policy 1.3.1 - Revise to reflect most current acronym references per EAC Policy 1.3.4 - Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant Objective 2.1-Revise to require that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the same drainage area per EAC Policy 2.1.3 - Revise to include requirement for measurement tools for determining improvements to the watersheds over time per EAC Policy 2.1.6 - Revise to require the use of watershed management plans for ongoing data collection guidance per EAC Objective 2.2- Modify to add qualifier. such as ..to attain the highest water quality practical" per staff; retain Objective text as written per ccpe and retain Objective text as written per SFWMD. Policy 2.2.1 - Policy 2.2.2 - Policy 2.2.5 - Objective 2.3- Objective 2.5- Policy 2.5.1 - Policy 2.5.2 - Policy 2.5.3 - Objective 3.1- Policy 3.1.1 - Objective 3.3- Policy 3.4.1 - Policy 3.4.4 - Policy 4.1.2 - Policy 4.1.3 - Policy 6.1.1- Revise to include provision to encourage wastewater re-use for irrigation per EAC. Revise to include establishment and implementation of a fertilizer ordinance to limit nitrogen and phosphorus use per EAe. Revise to include benchmarks for Policy achievement per EAC. Revise to include coordination and Plan development with the FDEP per staff; and retain Objective text as written per CCPe. Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC. Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC. Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC. Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC. Revise to reflect establishment of the monitoring network, addition of phrase, "to ensure highest water quality practical," and reference that groundwater monitoring activities are ongoing per staff: and, retain Objective text as written per CCPC. Revise to address improvement of groundwater monitoring in order to assess saltwater intrusion per EAC. Revise to add provision for staff assessment within a specific Immokalee wellfield extending under the airport and adjoining industrial lands per EAC. Revise to add reference to salinity trending within Policy per EAe. Revise to add provision for coordination with the SFWMD and Big Cypress Basin per EAe. Revise to indicate that the County, in coordination with the SFWMD shall be responsible for devising a method to determine agricultural pumpage. Revise to indicate County Department responsible for compiling water use requirements of the native plant and animal community associations within the County. ModifY to reference the June 2010 Land Development Code amendments that implement specific subsections of this Policy. address scrivener's errors in subsections Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Policy 6.1.2 - Policy 6.2.1- Objective 6.2- Policy 6.2.3 - Policy 6.2.5 - Policy 6.2.7 - Policy 6.3.2 - Policy 6.3.3 - Policy 7.1.2 - Policy 7.1.6 - Objective 7.2 - Policy 7.2.2 - 6.1.1 (7 & 13) and revise applicable subsections. delete subsection 6.1.1 (7), and add an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation per staff; revise to clearly reflect intent per cepc; and, revise to clearly reflect intent per EAC. Revise to include reference to the June 2010 Land Development Code amendments that implement specific subsections of the Policy, and include an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation purposes per staff; revise to clearly reflect intent per CCPC; and, revise to clearly reflect intent per EAC. Revise to correct the Florida Administrative Code reference; and insert reference to the current SFWMD land use and land cover inventory. Revise to require mitigation within the same drainage area as initial impact per EAC. Revise provision (6) to include that watershed management plans contain designated areas to be protected from development so as to preserve habitat, water flows, recharge areas and to prevent future flooding per EAC. Delete Section 6.2.5 (6)(5)(b)(3), as the specific criteria to identify mitigation priorities and implement the incentive program have been adopted into the Land development Code, and address native vegetation retention standards for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System as part of the lmmokalee Area Master Plan amendments per staff; and revise to clarify native vegetation requirements for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System per CCPC; and revise to clarifY native vegetation requirements for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System and provide cross references to other Elements per EAC. Revise to require wetland mitigation within impacted watershed per EAC. Revise to reflect maintenance dredging permit requirement and include within the CCME additional policies to protect sea grasses from dredging activities per the EAC. Delete, as the new FWC Rule Change prohibits speed zones to be established based on benthic resources per staff; retain Policy as written per CCPC; and, retain Policy as written per EAC. Delete references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy, revise to add a general reference to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance, and delete the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such mitigation is required by the FFWCC or USFWS per staff; and revise to add provision for retention of old growth slash pines for RCW nesting habitat per EAC, Delete, as the Land Development Code amendment to implement this Policy has been completed per staff; and, revise to reflect the continuance of Policy Objective per CCPC. Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on manatee deaths in Collier County waters. Delete specific reference to Policy 6.3.3, as reference is no longer relevant per staff; and revise Policy to retain reference to Policy 6.3.3 per EAC. Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on sea turtle disorientation. Revise to reflect the correct Policy reference. Modify Policy to refer to other funding opportunities. Revise to reflect the establishment of a training program. Revise to reflect current departmental reference. Modify to reflect the establishment, and maintenance, of a cooperative agreement. Modify to remove redundant sentence. Revise Policy or add policies to include strategies to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts. Policy 10.1.5 - Modify to consistently rcfer to "marine'" wetlands per staff; revise to clarify '"marine wetlands" per CCPC; and revise to define or clarify "marine wetlands" per EAC. Modify to require that destruction of any marine wetlands requires a fiscal analysis. Modify to require beach access sites shown on plans to be at the discretion of the County. Objective 10.3- Revise to include LDC map reference per EAC. Objective 10.4- Revise Objective to read. .... ,continue to be restored and then maintained per EAC. Policy 10.4.13 - Modify the Policy to change its focus to educating the public about sea level rise. Policy 10.6.2 - Delete. as existing regulations are adequate to address sea level rise per staff; retain Policy as written per the ccpe; and retain Policy as written per the EAC. Objective 12.1- Modify to address legislative changes to hurricane evacuations requirements. Policy 12.1.3 - Modify to reflect shelter space figures that are consistent with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study Update. Policy 12.1.5 - Modify to reflect updated equipment listing requirements for onsite shelters. Policy 12.1.7- Revise to add requirement to coordinate with the municipalities per CCPC. Policy 12.1.9 - Revise to reflect correct terminology and coordination activities. Policy 12.1.11 - Revise to reflect latest date of document. Policy 12.1.12 - Revise to reflect latest date of document. Policy 12.1.13 - Modify to reference funding limitations. Policy 12.1.14 - Delete, as the inclusion or hurricane shelters within the 5-year schedule of Capital Improvements is not supported. Policy 12.1.15 - Modify to make Policy references consistent with State and Federal guidelines; and, revise to reflect latest date of document. Policy 12.1.17 - Revise sentence for clarity. Policy 12.1.21 - Revise to reflect the next due date for the Plan update. Policy 12.2.5 - Modify to provide new CHHA definition. Policy 12.3.2 - Revise for clarification and sentence structure. Objective 12.4- Revise to reflect current terminology and departmental names. Objective 7.3- Policy 7.3.1 - Policy 7.4.1 - Policy 9.1.6 - Policy 9.1.7 - Policy 9.2.3 - Policy 9.4.3 - Policy 10.1.1 - Policy 10.1.6 - Policy 10.2.1 - Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE Objective 1 - Minor revisions to include certain key agencies. Exhibit "A" loAR Summary Sheet Policy 1.2 Policy 1.3 Policy 2.1 Policy 2.6 Policy 2.7 Policy 2.8 Policy 2.9 - Revision to reflect the Department name change. - Revision to reflect the Department name change. Inclusion of the word "appropriate" so that agreements are not limited to agencIes within Collier County. , Minor text revisions to update dates. - Minor text revisions to update dates and requirements. - Revision to correct SFWMD name. - Minor text revisions to include a comma and delete specific Florida Statute sub-section. Future Land Use Element Revise to allow for, but not mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace "shall" with "may"). Revise to correct the CIE Policy reference. If changes are made to the Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion Area density reduction factor, as proposed, then revise this policy to delete that reference. Revise to reflect the existence of the TCMAs (perhaps replace "shall designate" on first line with "has designated"). Revise to recognize the periodic update (perhaps replace the last sentence with a commitment to periodically update the inventory). Revise to specify that a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless first approved by the Board, to add reference to the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan, and to correct the date reference. Revise to clarify changes to the Urban designation refers to the new designation of lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the third line with "addition"). Revise as necessary (0 reflect the changed status and contents of the Inter-local Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the Public School Facilities Element. Revise to reference the establishment of TCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace "are hereby" in the last sentence with "have been"). Revise paragraph e) to begin with a verb so as to follow the sentence structure (perhaps add "Providing" before "Vehicular"). Revise to reference reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce greenhouse gas emissions," on the second line after "policies,". Revise for proper wording (perhaps replace "and their interconnection points" with "and/or provide interconnection(s)." Policy 7.7: Revise to update the Division name. Density Rating System - Residential In-fill: Revise to eliminate TDR requirement. Policy 1.4: Policy 2.1: Policy 2.4: Policy 2.5: Policy 4.5 Policy 4.7: Policy 5.3: Policy 5.14: Objective 6: Policy 6.3: Objective 7: Policy 7.3: Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area: Delete, and replace with a Coastal High Hazard Area density reduction factor; so reflect this on the FLUM; make correlating changes to all GMP references to this provision; revise both the Roadway Access and Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuses to replace reference to this provision with CHHA reference; and, revise the Conversion of Commercial Bonus to prohibit its application within the CHHA. The Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus would continue to apply within the CHHA. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict: Revise to reduce allowable density for residential-only projects within the CHHA to a maximum of 4 DU/A; revise the Master Planned Activity Center provision for clarity, and possible substantive change, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District: Revise to clarify the District only applies to A-zoned lands; to correct a miss-numbering in the RFMUD Sending Lands designation; and, revise the Exemption provision to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and to delete unneeded text from the Exemption title. Future Land Use Map: Revise the CHHA boundary to correlate with any CHHA boundary description change made in CCME Policy 12.2.5. Planning Horizon Issue: Revise the various planning horizons in the GMP to be consistent. DesignationlDistrict/Subdistrict Relationship: Revise throughout to clarity the relationship between Designations, Districts and Subdistricts. Map FLUE-14 Existing Zoning Consistent with FLUE by Policy, Immokalee Area: Delete; replacement map to be adopted into the Immokalee Area Master Plan to correlate with new Policy 6.1.9 in that Master Plan. Public School Facilities Element Policy 2.3 - Delete the last paragraph within the Policy. as the required school concurrency regulations were adopted within the Land Development Code in June 2010. Policy 2.5 - Delete the Policy, as the required school concurrency regulations were adopted within the Land Development Code in June 2010. Policy 3.6: Revise the Policy to reflect the establishment of the Citizen Advisory Group (CAG); and, add a reference to reflect that the planning and monitoring of school concurrency by the CAG is ongoing. Golden Gate Area Master Plan - The helow list designate policies that should he visited during the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy effort. Goal 1 - Reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Objectives and Policies. Objective 1.1 - Reformatting. Policy 1.1.4 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identity a specific land area and treat it differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain as written. lcxhihit "A " EAR Summary Sheet Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete. Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, relocate or reformat. Review for accuracy regarding references to maps located elsewhere, Policies found in other GMP Elements, and adoption dates of referenced documents; then, revise as necessary or retain as written. Policy 1.2.2 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to identifY another specific activity able to benefit from alternative financing, and re-emphasize balanced transportation planning efforts - in part or entirely. Policy 1.2.4 - Reformatting. Objective 1.3- Reformatting. Policy 1.3.1 - Minor revisions to provide new departmental references. Objective 1.4 - Reformatting. Policy 1.4.1 Defer consideration of suggested revisions to expand to ensure comprehensive and uniform application ofLDC. Goal 2 Reformatting. Objective 2.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identify a specific land area and treat it differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain as written; reformatting. Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable. Defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identifY a specific land area and treat it differently in these provisions; then. revise as necessary or retain with minor revision to update terminology. Policy 2.1.3 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable. Policy 2.1.4 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable. Objective 2.2 - Defer consideration of suggested revisions to show remaining efforts following major project completion; reformatting. Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable. defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable; review for accuracy regarding references to LDC or Statutory cites,; then, revise as necessary or retain as written. Reformatting. 3.1- Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Goal 4 Reformatting. Objective 4.1 - Reformatting. Policy 4.1.1 Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. GoalS Reformatting. Objective 5.1 - Consider minor revision to show use of existing resource; revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; re,state to capture essence of subsequent Policy; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy 1.1.5 Policy 1.1.6 Policy 1.1.8 Policy 2.1.1 Policy 2.1.2 Policy 2.2.1 Policy 2.2.2 Goal 3 Objective Policy 4.1.2 Policy 4.1.3 Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Policy 5.1.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revision to show use of existing resource; revisions to better support its Objective: reformatting. Objective 5.2 - Minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan: reformatting. Policy 5.2.1 - Minor revision for clarity: defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely: reformatting. Policy 5.2.2 - Revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; consider minor revision to show use of existing MPO resource: defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely, Policy 5.2.3 - Minor revision to show remaining efforts following major project completion. Objective 5.3- Defer consideration of suggested revision to show use of existing resource; reformatting. Policy 5.3.2 - Minor revision to strengthen preservation efforts. Goal 6 - Defer consideration of suggested modification to subsequent Objectives and Policies, in demonstrating GHG emissions - in part or cntirely: reformatting. Objective 6.1- Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies. in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely: revisions to illustrate expanded planning efforts for more mobility options; reforn1atting. - Minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts; reformatting. - Minor revision to reflect continuing efforts between agencies. -Defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies. in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely: revisions to this Objective and its subsequent Policies addressing development of route alternatives for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area; reformatting. Policy 6.2.4 - Revisions to strengthen the connection with Transportation Policy 7.1 and develop different urban and rural standards and criteria. Objective 6.3 - revisions to this Objective and its subsequent Policies addressing development of route alternatives for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area; reformatting, Policy 6.3.1 - Defer consideration of suggested revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Policy 6.3.2 - Minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Goal 7 - Reformatting. Objective 7.1 - Reformatting. Policy 7.1.3 - Revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Objective 7.2 - Reformatting. Policy 7.2.1 - Minor revision. Policy 7.2.2 - Minor revision to eliminate duplication of activities. Objective 7.3- Re'state to capture essence of subsequent Policies; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Policy 7.3.1 - Minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts. strengthen this Goal, and its support for reducing VMT and Policy 6.1.1 Policy 6.1.2 Objective 6.2 Exhibit "A " EAR Summary Sheet Policy 7.3.2 - Review for accuracy regarding references to adoption dates of referenced documents; then, revise as necessary or retain as written. Policy 7.3.4 - Minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date,specific task. ECONOMIC ELEMENT Objective I Policy 1.2 Objective 2 Objective 3 Policy 3.1 Policy 3.8 Policy 3.9 Policy 3.14 Policy 3.14 Objective 4 Policy 4.1 Policy 4.2 Policy 4.3 - Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective. - Revision to expand focus of policy. - Revision to expand focus of objective - Revision to objective by making this objective number I, with all policies under this objective reflecting the change. Modification based upon expansion of the policy. Revision based upon need to explain what is the County's traditional economic base. Deletion based upon redundancy with policy 3.3 - Relocation of text. Replace existing policy with one which calls for the County to monitor the County's unemployment rate. - Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective. - Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single policy. - Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single policy. , Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single policy. Exhibit "A" EAR Summary Sheet Exhibit B The following Policies andlor Objectives have recommendations from the CCPC, EAC, andlor staff that suggest different direction or require funding for the proposed changes. Staff is asking the BCC to provide final arbitration on the issues identified. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 1.1.3: Collier County shall continue to support established environmental policies by maintaining an appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of developing, administering, and providing long-tenm direction for the protection and management of the County's environmental resources. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The County continues to support established environmental policies by maintaining an appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of developing, administering, and providing long-term direction for the protection and management of the County's environmental resources. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUl!Ust n, 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that the financial feasibility of achieving the Policy objectives with limited staff resources be evaluated.] (Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and AdOTJtion Hearin~s ,. Staff Comment - No change to this Policy is recommended. Staff believes that current staffing levels are adequate to fulfill the Policy objectives, and adjustments have been made over time in response to changes in workload.) OBJECTIVE 1.2: Maintain the framework for an integrated, computer-based environmental resources data storage, analysis, and graphics system and annually update the databases based on previous year's analytical data in order to monitor the status of the County's natural resources and propose potential protection measures when appropriate. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The Collier County Environmental Planning Section maintains a robust, GIS,based system (ESRI's ArcGIS) that will be updated annually. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Au~ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that the Objective address/include provisions for quality of data, analysis of data, and availability of data; and, the Environmental Planning Section maintain copies oj; and an index to. analyses performed on these G1S,based data.] 1 Exhibit 8 (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDlion Hearini!s - Staff Comment ., No change to this Policy is recommended The computer,based environmental resources data is stored with the Division '.I' GIS data. This makes the data most available to other county staff Data quality details are stored as metadatafiles when they are provided by the data source. Published GIS data are required to include metadata files. A lmost all county data are public records and available. there is no need/or the environmental planning section to maintain copies. A log o! environmental analysis will be started and stored with the environmental GIS data.) Policy 1.2.3: Collected and/or compiled data will be organized by established water-shed and sub'basin units. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Most of this data is in GIS format. so there is no need or benefit to organize it by watershed. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However. the Policy should be modified to require watershed dependent data only be organized by watershed and sub-basin units. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EACi Comment from the AUi!ust 11, 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting that text be added to the Policy that ensures data quality.) {Plannini! Commission Comment from the AUi!ust 27. 2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that the Policy be revised to read "Non GIS-based data collected will be organized by established watershed and sub,basin units. 'J (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDlion Hearini!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the CCPC recommendation that the Policy be revised/hI' clarity. However, staff does not concur with the EAC's recommendation. as "data quality" is addressed in preceding Policies.) Policy 1.3.1: The purpose of the NRPA program is to direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The program will-include the following: a. Identification of the NRPAs in map form as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map; During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area, the County has determined that CREW Trust lands, Belle Meade, a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be identified as NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate Estates is a NPRA, The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the Future Land Use Map. b. A process for verifying the existence and boundaries of NRPAs during development permit applications; c. Guidelines and standards for development of NRPAs including conservation guidelines to protect natural resource values, to maintain ecologically functioning systems, and to restore or mitigate NRPAs already degraded. Allowable land uses, vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species 2 Exhibit B protection criteria for the NRPAs are those contained in the NRPA Overlay within the Future land Use Element d. A review process, integrated into the normal development application review, to ensure that the guidelines and standards are being met; e. A program to defer development of NRPAs. First consideration should be fee simple purchase (based on public referenda approving and funding purchases). Other options should include, but not be limited to, tax incentives and transfer of development rights; f. A program to pursue Delegation of Authority Agreements with State and Federal Permitting agencies for local regulation of activities that may alter the biological and physical characteristics of NRPAs; g. The County shall seek assistance from and support State (e.g. CARL, SOR) or Federal land acquisition programs for County areas qualifying as NRPAs. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The County established Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs) to direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The Policy also provides information regarding the relationship of the NRP As to the Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment. Finally, the Policy requires the County to seek assistive from, and support, state and/or federal land acquisition programs for areas qualifying as NRP As; Conservation Collier identifies nominated properties within Federal and State acquisition areas and coordinates with the agencies to make them aware of willing sellers within their acquisition areas. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUl!ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting to delete the acronym "CARL" and insert "Florida Forever ": and spell-out the acronym, "SOR ,. ,Save Our Rivers.] {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - Staff generally agrees with the EAC's recommendation, and suggests that the Policy be revised to read, "The County shall seek assistance from, and support, State and/or Federal land acquisition programs for County areas qualifYing as NRP As. ''j OBJECTIVE 2.1: By January 2008, the County shall complete the prioritization and begin the process of preparing Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The process shall consist of (1) an evaluation of areas for which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on current or past watershed management planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available data and information that can be used in the development of Watershed Management Plans, and (3) budget authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed Management Plan by January 2008. A funding schedule shall be established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by 2010. In selecting the order of Plan completion, the County shall give priority to watersheds where the development growth potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of wetland and listed 3 Exhibit B species habitats. The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the Federal and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the following as interim standards for development: a. All new development and re-clevelopment projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District (February 2006) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable offsite discharge rates required by Drainage Sub- element Policy 6.2 and 6.3, respectively; b. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland. c. Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of November 17, 2005. Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheetflow conditions. d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to determine impacts to natural wetlands, f1owways, or sloughs. For this particular evaluation, natural wetlands, f1owways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified as contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet facultative plant species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the natural wetland, f1owway, or slough at least one (1) foot lower than the ground at the edge of the natural wetland, flowway, or slough. The edge of the natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be identified by field determination and based upon vegetation and elevation differences from the adjacent uplands or transitional wetlands. The County shall require the applicant to avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or, when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact. The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 2001-27, adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and provided basin delineations where special peak discharge rates have been established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings of the Watershed Management Plans. e. All new development and re-development projects shall ensure surrounding properties will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on stormwater sheet flow, f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all development projects to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental permits. g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future development or re-development projects. Best Management Practices means structural and non-structural facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution either through source control or treatment of stormwater. Figure 1. Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.1.d is 4 Exhibit B Applicable [See Figure 1 following CCME text] Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County is currently involved in the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The County completed the initial delineation and prioritization of the watersheds by the end of November 2007. Dedicated funding for development of the Watershed Management Plans was also obtained and set aside in 2007. The County coordinated with the Florida Department of Emergency Management coastal Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) aerial topographic mapping effort to obtain more detailed and expanded coverage of the County. The County also coordinated with the South Florida Water Management District to utilize their existing two- dimensional regional hydrologic and hydraulic model for southwest Florida as a starting tool in the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The County utilized the various policies under CCME Objective 2.1 to form the basis for the Scope of Services and then hired a consultant team to prepare the Watershed Management Plans. The work is in progress and is scheduled for completion by the end of 20 10. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be modified to reflect completed work, and the first sentence in (c) reworded as follows, "Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated Special Flood Hazard Area (flood zones starting with the letter "V" or "A") as depicted on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency." {Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf! held on 3/15/10): Public stated that the County has not developed a county-wide stormwater plan.] {Public Comment (Communitv MeetiniZ held on 3/15/10): Public stated that all development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated after each watershed and its characteristics are developed.] {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUiZust II. 2010 WorksholJ ~ Suggesting to add in section b. of the Objective, a requirement that compensationfor all wetland impacts occur within the same drainage area.] {Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and Adootion HeariniZs - Starr Comment - No change is recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.] Policy 2.1.3: The Plans will also evaluate structural and non-structural controls for restoring historical hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where pOSSible and for reducing the impacts of canal and stormwater discharges to estuaries. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Scope of Services for development of the Watershed Management Plans includes this policy's features. 5 Exhibit B The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust II. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting that measurement tools he added to the Policy so as to determine improvements to the watersheds over time.] (Environmental Advisorv Council (EA C) Comment trom the November 3. 2010 Adovtion Hearinz - Suggesting that the EAC comment/rom August II. 2010 be revised to read. "measurement tools be added to the Policyfi}r determining improvements to the watersheds over time."] (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and Adoption HeGl'inl!s - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy is recommended at this time. The Watershed Management Plans include performance measures, and the need/or/uture evaluation of improvements will be addressed when Plans are adopted.] Policy 2.1.6: Until the completion and adoption of individual watershed management plans, promote water management permitting on a basin by basin approach. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Water management permitting is regulated by the South Florida Water Management District. The Policy is not relevant and should be deleted, as water management permitting is regulated by the SFWMD. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Auzust lJ. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting that data shortfalls be addressed] (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment (rom the November 3. 2010 Adovtion Hearinz - Suggesting that EAC comment Fom August II, 2010 be revised to read, "use watershed management plans/or ongoing data collection guidance. '] (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and Adovtion Hearinf!s Sta((Comment - No change to the Policy is recommended at this time. as the Watershed Management Plans will identifY data needs.] Policy 2.2.1: Wastewater treatment plants shall not be allowed to discharge directly to rivers, canals or jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element. Policv Achievement Analysis: Policy 2.2.] bans wastewater treatment plants from discharging directly into rivers, canals or jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals. Objectives. and Policies of this Element. 6 Exhibit B This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUl!ust 11, 2010 Workshov - Suggesting to insert the phrase, "encourage wastewater re,use jor irrigation" within the Policy.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment ~ Staff recommends retaining the Policy as written, as the reference to "re,use" is not applicable to this Policy. Further, staff suggests an additional Policy be added within the CCME to address the EAC's recommendation, if Board directed.) Policy 2.2.5: By December 31, 2008, and no less than every three years, stormwater management systems shall be inspected and certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for compliance with their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected. Policy Achieyement Analysis: The deadline for Policy 2.2.5 has not been met, and the County has not identified stormwater management systems that are not currently meeting State water quality treatment standards. The County is developing a process for storm water management systems, which is expected to be completed by December 2015. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect an extended deadline to December 2015; and include a requirement to coordinate activities with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and FDEP. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EACJ Comment trom the AUl!ust 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting to add benchmarks within the Policy for the achievement of the stated objectives by year 2015.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy is recommended at this time. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has been working on an update to the statewide stormwater Rule that includes 'ystem inspections. The County isfollowing the development of this Rule and will wait to review the standards in the Rule prior to adopting a local ordinance.] Policy 3.1.1: Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as follows: 1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones defined as follows: a) W-1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield). b) W-2 is the land area between the W-1 boundary line and the ten percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). 7 Exhibit B c) W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). d) W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). 2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows: a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones. b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3. c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and hazardous wastes: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3. d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 liquid gallons or 1,0.00 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary containment in W-1, W-2, W-3. e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W-1. f) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found in 40 CFR part 135. g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use. h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited in W-1 and W-2, conditional use required in W-3 and W-4. i) Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-1 subject to complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low-pressure lateral distribution. j) On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-1, W-2, and W- 3 shall meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-10, F.A.C. as the rule existed on August 31, 1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring plan. 3. Conditional uses shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and where impacts of the development will be isolated from the Surficial and Intermediate Aquifer. Policv Achievement Analvsis: There is one (1) policy within this Objective. Policy 3.1.1 contains criteria for the identification of wellhead protection areas within the County's Future Land Use Map Series. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but paragraph 3 should be modified to: clarify the conditional use reference pertains to those conditional uses required by this policy, as opposed to all conditional uses allowed by the zoning district on a given property within a wellfield protection area; and, remove or clarify the term "extraordinary circumstances." Additionally, the Policy will be evaluated to determine if it would be more appropriately located in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE). {Environmental Advisorv Council (EACi Comment (i'om Auzust II. 2010 Workshov - Suggest addressing the improvement of ground water monitoring in order to assess saltwater intrusion.] 8 Exhibit B {Post Workshop and Adootion Hearinrzs - Staff Comment - Implementation of the EAC's recommendation will require the monitoring activities to be programmed andfunded.] OBJECTIVE 3.3: Continue to identify, refine extents of, and map zones of influence and contribution around potable wellfields in order to identify activities that must be regulated to protect ground water quality near wellfields. (Refer to Objective 1.1 in the Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element.) Objective Achievement Analysis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy will be evaluated to determine if it would be more appropriately located in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE). {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the Aurzust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting that staff assess the wel!field in Immokalee that has a 10 year cone of depression extending under the airport and adjoining industrial zoning.] {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adootion Hearinrzs -~ Staff Comment -Implementation of the EAC's recommendation will require the existing Model be adjusted to accommodate the 10- year Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones, as the Model evaluates years 1. 2, 5 and 20 only. ([he cost to adjust the Model is unknown at this time.)] Policy 6.1.6: Exemptions from the native vegetation retention requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 - The requirements of Policy 6.1.2 shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses. Existing use shall be defined as: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Conditional Use or Rezone petition was approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application was submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with, or clearly ancillary to, the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe area, and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies for the Rural Fringe Area as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity. On the County owned land located in Section 25, Township 26 E, Range 49 S (+/-360 acres), the native vegetation retention and site preservation requirements may be reduced to 50% if the permitted uses are restricted to the portions of the property that are contiguous to the existing land fill operations; exotic removal will be required on the entire +/- 360 acres. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.1.6 makes all existing land uses exempt from the native vegetation retention requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 if the effected land uses were issued prior to June 19,2002; 9 Exhibit B or projects for which a Conditional use or Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application has been submitted prior to June 19,2002. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC') Commenl fi'om Ihe Auzust II. 2010 Worksho/J - Suggesting thai Ihe last senlence in the Poli(~v be revised to read" exotic removal and preserve management will be... 'J (Post EAC and CCPC Work.~hom' and Adomion Hearinzs " SIaff Comment -No change is recommended, as the Policy was adopled as part of Ihe Final Order amendments in 2002 to accommodate the expansion of Ihe landfill. Preserve management is already required pursuanl 10 Policy 6.1.2 (6) of this E1emenl.! OBJECTIVE 6.2: The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EACJ Comment from Ihe AUl!Ust II. 20JO Worksho/J - Suggesting slaff include within the Objeclive the requirement for mitigation within the same drainage area as the initial wetland impact] (Post EAC and CCPC Worksho/Js and AdOlJ/ion Hearinl!s - SIaff Comment ,.. No change is recommended to this Objective as pari of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will be addressed as pari of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, miligation requirements for weiland impacts will be delermined by Ihe BCe with the adoplion of the Watershed Managemenl Plans.) Policy 6.2.3: Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. This wetland preservation and conservation process shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plan process, as referenced in Objective 2.1 of this Element. However, the process outlined within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away from large interconnected wetland systems. These wetland systems have been identified based on their type, values, functions, sizes, conditions and locations within Collier County. These systems predominantly occur east of the County's Urban boundary, as delineated on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM), within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Many of these wetlands fall within public lands or land targeted for acquisition. High quality wetlands systems located on private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation 10 Exhibit B requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or via the NRPA or Sending designations within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District or land/easement acquisition, or innovative landowner incentives. Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the northeastern portion of Collier County, excluding the community of Immokalee, are contained in the Rural lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) of the FLUE (and as depicted on the FlUM). Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the Urban and Estates designated areas of the County shall be based upon the jurisdictional determinations made by the applicable state or federal agency. Where permits issued by such state or federal agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within Urban and Estates designated areas and require mitigation for such impacts, the permitting agency's mitigation requirements shall be deemed to preserve and protect wetlands and their functions, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County shall be protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the remaining allowable land uses. Collier County shall direct incompatible land uses away from these large landscape scale wetland systems through implementation of the following protection and conservation mechanisms: (1) Conservation Designation Best available data indicates that 76% of all wetlands found in Collier County are contained within the boundaries of the Conservation Designation as depicted on the Countywide Future land Use Map. The overall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of Collier County and their associated environmental, recreational, and economic benefits. The allowed land uses specified in the FLUE's Conservation Designation (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section IV.) will accommodate limited residential development and future non-residential development. These limitations support Collier County's comprehensive process to direct concentrated population growth and intensive land development away from large connected wetland systems. (2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC) Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay. The land development regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay District, as depicted on the Countywide Future land Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the goal of directing higher intensity land uses away from wetland systems. The development standards for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE land Use Designation Section V.) specify that site alterations shall be limited to 10% of the total site. The majority of the land contained within the ACSC is also within the Conservation Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of that land Use Designation. (3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs) Major wetland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to establish the NRPA Overlay District as shown on the Future land Use Map, and as discussed in FLUE land Use Designation, Section V.C. These areas include high functioning wetland systems and, although portions of the NRPA Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation, represent 11 Exhibit B approximately 12% of the County's wetlands, which are not located in Conservation lands. Based on the relatively high concentration of wetlands within NRPA designated lands, incompatible land uses shall be directed away from these areas. Allowable land uses within NRPAs are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 90%. (4) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands Best available data indicates that 16,000+ acres of wetlands are contained within designated Sending lands and that such wetlands constitute approximately 70% of land cover in these areas. Incompatible land uses are directed away from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending lands through an incentive-based Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program that allows land owners within these Sending lands to transfer their residential density out of the Sending lands to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (and limited Urban) Receiving lands. A complete description of the TDR Program is contained in the FLUE, Future land Use Designation Description Section, Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Incompatible land uses are also directed away from Sending lands through restrictions on allowable uses. Finally, allowable uses within these lands are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 80% to 90%, as required by Policy 6.7,1 of this Element. (5) Flowway Stewardship Areas Ere-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and 2002-54] Flowway Stewardship Areas have been designated within the Rural lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RlSA), as depicted on the Future land Use Map, and are shown on the Rural lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Map Series. Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs) are for the most part privately owned wetlands that are located within the Camp Keais Strand and Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands form the principal wetland flowway systems in the RlSA. The Overlay provides an incentive to permanently protect FSAs through the creation and transfer of Stewardship Credits. It also contains provisions that eliminate incompatible uses from the FSAs and, which establish protection measures. (6) Watershed Management Plans Collier County will establish watershed management plans throughout the County, but with particular emphasis on the Urban and Estates designated areas. These watershed management plans shall be established in accordance with Objective 2.1 of this Element and will include the preservation or, where feasible, creation of landscape-scale wetland conservation areas to act as habitat, natural water quality treatment and water quantity retention/detention areas. The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from such large-scale wetlands. Collier County shall allow for more intensive development to occur in Rural Fringe Receiving lands, North Golden Gate Estates, the Rural-Settlement Area District, and the Urban Designated Areas subject to the land uses identified in the Future land Use Element, the Immokalee Area Master Plan, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. These areas account for only 6% of Collier County's wetlands. Except for tidal wetlands within the coastal portion of the Urban Designated Area and wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, the County finds that the wetland systems in these areas are more fragmented and altered than those systems located within the 12 Exhibit B Conservation Lands, ACSC and NRPA Overlays, and Rural Fringe Sending Lands. On a project-specific basis, wetlands and wetland functions shall be protected through the following mechanisms: (1) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland permitting; (2) Vegetation preservation policies supporting CCME Objective 6.1; (3) Wetland protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2; (4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE (5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element. (6) Land or easement acquisition. (7) Land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief, or USDA grants for restoration. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.2.3 requires Collier County to implement a comprehensive process to ensure that wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. The process outlined within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away from large connected wetland systems. High quality wetlands systems located on private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or through the Natural Resource Protection Areas or Sending designations in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County are protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the remaining allowable land uses. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment tram the AUl?Ust 11. 2010 Workvhol1 - Suggesting that provision (6) of the Policy be revised to include that the watershed management plans contain designated areas to be protected from development so as to preserve habitat, water flows, recharge areas and to prevent future flooding.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workvhol1s and AdOl11ion HearinfZs - Staff Comment - No change is recommended. as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans.] Policy 6.2.7: Within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County shall rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (1) For single-family residences within Southern Golden Gate Estates or within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, the County shall require the appropriate federal and state wetland-related permits before Collier County issues a building permit. (2) Outside of Southern Golden Gate Estates and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, Collier County shall inform applicants for individual single-family building 13 Exhibit B penmits that federal and state wetland permits may be required prior to construction unless the proposed residence is within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The County shall also notify the applicable federal and state agencies of single-family building permits applications in these areas. (3) Within North Golden Gate Estates and the Rural Settlement Area, Collier County shall incorporate certain preserved and/or created wetlands and associated uplands into the County's approved watershed management plans, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element. The size and location of wetlands incorporated into the watershed management plans will be based upon the approved requirements for such plans. The County may issue single- family building permits within or adjacent to such wetlands. subject to appropriate mitigation requirements, which preserve the functionality of the wetland within the applicable watershed management plan. For a proposed residence which is to be located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element, the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. (4) Collier County shall continue to work with federal and state agencies to identify properties that have a high probability of wetlands and animal listed species occurrence. The identification process will be based on hydric soils data and other applicable criteria. Once this identification process is complete, the County will determine if the process is sufficiently accurate to require federal and state wetland approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit within these areas. The County shall use information on wetland and/or listed species occurrence to inform property owners of the potential existence of wetlands and/or listed species on their property, (5) Within one year after Watershed Management Plans are accepted by the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County shall develop and implement additional means to protect wetland systems identified in each Plan for preservation or restoration. Means to consider include innovative landowner incentives, transferable development rights, tax relief, land or easement acquisition, state and federal grants, and enhanced regulations. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.2.7 stipulates that within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County is to rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable Jurisdictional agency. except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisor" Council (EACi Comment from the AUi!ust ]], 2()] () WorkshoTJ- Suggesting that wetland mitigation occur within the same watershed} {Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and Ademtion Hearini!s - Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determine by the Bee with the adoption ofthe Watershed Management Plans.} Policy 6.3.2 Impacts to sea-grass beds shall be minimized by locating boat docks more than 10 feet from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks shall be sited to impact the smallest areas of sea-grass beds possible, be no lower than 3.5 feet NGVD, 14 Exhibit B have a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no wider than 4 feet. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.3.2 stipulates that impacts to sea-grass beds are to be minimized by locating boat docks more than 10 feet from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks are to be sited in such manner as to impact the smallest area of sea-grass beds possible, and to be no lower than 3.5 feet NGVD, have a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no wider than 4 feet. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Auzust II. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting that a reference to the required maintenance dredging permit be inserted within the Policy; and additional Policies be added. if necessary, to protect sea grasses from dredging activities.} {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf.!s - Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as dredging is regulated by the State of Florida and Federal government, not the County. Maintenance dredging is generally allowed by these agencies. Mitigation may be required and determined during permitting with the State and Federal agencies. Seagrass protection issues are required to be addressed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission pursuant to the Florida Manatee Management Plan adopted by the State in December 2007. The plan calls for implementation of a statewide seagrass management plan, creation of an interagency statewide seagrass monitoring plan. and evaluation of the feasibility of a rule for the protection of the state '8 seagrass resources.} Policy 7.1.2 Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA Overlay, non- agricultural development, excluding individual single family residences, shall be directed away from listed species and their habitats by complying with the following guidelines and standards: (1) A wildlife survey shall be required for all parcels when listed species are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site or where listed species are directly observed on the site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The County shall notify the FFWCC and USFWS of the existence of any listed species that may be discovered. (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated listed species are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. (a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. 15 Exhibit B Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors 1. The following references shall be used, as appropriate, to prepare the required management plans; a. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, USFWS, 1999. b. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region, USFWS,1987. c. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations found on Lands Slated for Large Scale Development in Florida, Technical Report No.4, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1987. d. Ecology and Development-Related Habitat Requirements of the Florida Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. e. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of the Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco Sparverius Paulus) on Large-scale Development Sites in Florida, Nongame Techincal Report No, 13, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1993. 2. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and the FFWCC, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 3. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as denning, foraging or other indications, priority shall be given to preserving the listed species habitats first, as a part of the retained native vegetation requirement contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 this element The County shall also consider the recommendations of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. (c) Habitat preservation for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy, (d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nesting season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 16 Exhibit B (e) For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection plan shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) may be present, the management plans shall require that garbage be placed in bear-proof containers, at one or more central locations. The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. Mitigation for impacting habitat suitable for black bear shall be considered in the management plan. (g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management plan shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be designed and managed using standards found in that district. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved vegetative communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (h)ln order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of Policy 7.1.2(3). (i) The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater than 10 acres. (3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in issuing development orders on property containing listed species. It is recognized that these agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may change the requirements contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such change shall be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 7.1.2 provides guidelines and standards for directing non-agricultural development, except for individual single-family residences, away from listed species and their habitats. This policy does not apply to lands located within the RLSA. 17 Exhibit B This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to remove the references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy; add a general reference to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance, since the most current information used by these agencies should be used in protecting listed species; and, delete the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such mitigation is required by the FFWCC or USFWS, (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment (rom the AUl!ust 11, 2010 Workshop - Suggesting to add a provision in (e) to encourage the retention of old growth slash pines filr RCW nesting habitat) (Post EAC and CCPC Worhhops and Ado(Jfion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as the Policy requires adverse impacts to active red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) clusters and their fiJraging habitat be minimized. and where adverse effects cannot be avoided, to compensate or mitigate fiJI' impacts that remain. Old growth slash pines may not necessariZy be located in the best RCWfiJraging habitat. depending on how impacted the site is. and may be more sensitive (0 die of( with hahitat res/oration effiJrls) OBJECTIVE 10,3: Undeveloped coastal barriers shall be maintained predominantly in their natural state and their natural function shall be protected, maintained and enhanced. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objectiye remains relevant and should be retained. [Environmental Advisory Council (EAt') Comment Fom the August 11. 2010 Worhhop - Suggesting that a reference /0 maps contained in the Land Development Code be added.} (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Ado(Jtion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - The undeveloped coastal barriers identified in the text of the Land Development Code and CCME Policy 10.6.1 are identified by the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System. A reference to the Federal Coas/al Barrier Resources S:ystem maps should be provided in CCME Objective 10.3) OBJECTIVE 10.5: For undeveloped shorelines, provide improved opportunities for recreational, educational, scientific, and esthetic enjoyment of coastal resources by protecting beaches and dunes and by utilizing or where necessary establishing construction standards, which will minimize the impact of manmade structures on the beach and dune systems. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmen/al Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment fi'om the AUl!ust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting to insert "mangroves" after "heach and dune systems" or add another Policy to address protection of coastal mangroves) 18 Exhibit B {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!.s - Staff Comment - No change is needed, as the undeveloped coastal barriers identified b the County and Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System also include adjacent mangrove systems. Protection is also provided by either conservation easements or Special Treatment overlay within the County. In addition, State and Federal permits require minimizing the impacts to mangroves.] 19 Exhibit B Staff Report Presentation to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) for recommendation to the BCC on the seven year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for sufficiency review according to the procedures and criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, Evaluation and Appraisal of Comprehensive Plan. OBJECTIVE: Florida Statutes require all local governments within the State of Florida to maintain comprehensive planning programs based upon an adopted local government comprehensive plan. As part of this planning requirement, the local government must monitor changing conditions and must use this information to guide periodic amendments to the local comprehensive plan. Within Collier County the local comprehensive plan is the Growth Management Plan (GMP), originally adopted by Ordinance NO. 89-05. The periodic amendment process, which occurs once every seven years, as described in Chapter 163.3191, F.S., is a two-phase process referred to as the Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR), The EAR evaluates the performance of the various Elements of the local government comprehensive plan since the previous EAR-based amendments. It assesses the successes and shortcomings of the various Goals, Objectives, and Policies included within the GMP and designates Objectives and Policies which need revisions, modifications or deletions. Additionally, the EAR is the primary means by which the local plan can respond to changes in federal, state ur regiunal planning requirements. It should be noted that for the 2004 to 20] 0 evaluation period for the 2011 EAR, there have been 57 GMP amendments processed by the County. While not all of these amendments were sent to the Department of Community Affairs for adoption, they were either publicly or privately submitted for processing and evaluation. A fact that recognizes the contemplation on the County's part of what improvements are need to assure the GMP is an effective blueprint for guiding future growth, but also accentuates the need for the comprehensive review of the GMP to ensure there is agreement within the Plan's individual elements. Ultimately, the Objectives and Policies designated for adjustment in the EAR become the basis of proposed amendments to the local government comprehensive plan, the second phase of the process. These EAR-based amendments, as reviewed by the Environmental Action Council (EAC) and Planning Commission (PC), and subsequently adopted by the BCC, after found in compliance with the Chapter 163, Part 11, F.S., then become part of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the GMP until the next EAR is prepared in seven years. BACKGROUND: On August 25 and 27, 2010 the CCPC conducted its EAR workshop in which the policies and objectives of each of the GMP's individual elements was conducted. The EAR adoption review should serve as an opportunity for the CCPC to confirm the Policies and Objectives designated for modification and the issues raised are those discussed during the August workshops and will be those recommended to the Bce within the EAR for adoption. 11 Collier County 20 II Evaluaton & Appraisal Report CCPC Adoption Public Hearing As noted during the August workshop, the adoption of the EAR is the first part of a two prong process, during which areas of the GMP are evaluated for their cffectiveness and if appropriate designated for adjustment or change. The exact specificity of that change is not determined during this first prong of the process, only that a change is needed within the various Elements, Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the GMP. Post adoption of the EAR by the BCC in January of 20 II is when the specifics of the changes called out for in the EAR are composed and refined through the GMP EAR amendment adoption process. The County will have eighteen months from the date or the EAR adoption by the BCC to adopt the changes designated by the EAR. Understanding this bifurcatcd process provides a clear direction for what is being asked of the EAC during the EAR workshop. At the completion of the EAR August workshops with the CCPC and the EAC, staff presented the post workshop EAR books to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and the various other state reviewing agencies. In late October the County received the review comments which have been attached as exhibit "A" to this staff report. The majority of the comments from the DCA focus upon the need for further data and analysis regarding the major issues and their inter- relationship to the specific goals of the GMP's various elements, as well as the effectiveness of the elements as they relate to the major issues. The CCPC EAR Adoption books have been updated to address the specific comments contained in the courtesy review letter. It should be noted that the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) at their November 3, 2010 regularly scheduled public hearing provided a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to adopt the proposed EAR. The policies and objectives recommended for modification by the EAC have been specified within the CCPC EAR Adoption book. ORGANiZATION OF THE EAC-EAR ADOPTION BOOK: The presented 2011 EAC,EAR book is organized into a single-bound report containing an introduction and three (3) major chapters. These chapters are: Chapter One - Public Participation & Issues Identified Chapter Two - Countywide Assessment Chapter Three -Evaluation or Major Issues Chapter One - Public Purticipution & fl'sues Idenlijied details the issues that were brought to the process from the public during the "Public Participation" portion of the EAR process. Chapter Two - Countywide Assessment is the individual review of each Element and Sub-Element of the GMP and the Goals, Objectives and Policies that comprise each of those Elements or Sub- Elements. Chapter Three - Evaluation of Major issues are the issues agreed upon between the County and the DCA. Chapter One and Chapter Three are both connected within Chapter Two. (Bolded for emphasis) Within each Element reviewed within Chapter Two, stafT has referenced Objectives and Policies that are directly related to Chapters One and Three. For example a public comment that is directly linked to Policy 1.6.1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE) will be recognized within Chapter Two, as well as Chapter One. Additionally, Objectives and Policies that are directly related to a major issue will be specified within Chapter Three, as well as within the Element review contained within chapter Two. 21 Collier County 20 J 1 Evaluaton & Appraisal Repon CCPC Adoption Public Hearing As described above the structure of the EAR inter-relates all of the chapters contained in the report. Within each of these elements, the pertinent comments from the August workshops with the EAC and the CCPC have been applied to the related objective or policy, to provide identification of both bodies' perspective, as well as comments offered by the general public. Unlike the EAR workshop edition books, the EAR adoption edition does not contain the evaluation of every policy and objective within the GMP, but rather only the objective and policies within the various elements in which modifications are being suggested are included. It should be noted that a few policies in which the CCPC and the EAC have taken differing positions, these areas will be highlighted during the EAR adoption hearing and will be presented to the BCC for final arbitration on the issue FISCAL IMPACT: County staff undertook the preparation of the EAR in-house. The Comprehensive Planning Department prepared the EAR with input and contributions from numerous county divisions and departments. Direct and indirect costs have not been calculated for the preparation of the EAR. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Pursuant to section l63.3187(6)(a), Florida Statutes, "No local government may amend its comprehensive plan after the date established by the state land planning agency for adoption of its evaluation and appraisal report unless it has submitted its report or addendum to the land planning agency as prescribed by section 163.3191 ..." Therefore, timely action by the EAC, CCPC and BCC adopting the EAR is necessary in order for the consideration of future comprehensive amendments. Otherwise, Collier County will be imposed with the statutory sanction that would prohibit amending its comprehensive plan. REOUESTED ACTION: Staff request that the cepc reviews the proposed policies and objectives designated for change within the individual Elements, as directed during the EAC and CCPC EAR workshops held in August 2010, and provide a recommendation to adopt the 2011 Collier County Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the Board of County Commissioners. 31 Collier County 20 II Evaluaton & Appraisal Report CCPC Adoption Public Hearing Prepared By: ~~ Date: Michael Basi, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Section Reviewed By: Oate: /i)a2 /') ~ (--/ 7 Approved By:; - ''7/ //""f / Oate: Nick Casalanguid, eputy Administrator Growth Management Division 41 1\-10-10 i (- r 3 - Z 0', D //-1&'10 Collier County 20 II Evaluaton & Appraisal Report CCPC Adoption Public Hearing Exhibit" A" .. . ..~~. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Governor THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary October IS, 2010 The Honorable Fred W. Coyle, Chairman Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 RE: Collier County Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report Dear Chairman Coyle: The Department has completed a review of the Collier County proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and has enclosed comments and recommendations for your consideration, including review comments from other state and regional agencies, The proposed EAR makes progress in evaluating the comprehensive plan as part of the EAR process. However, the EAR should be reviscd and strengthened to address the issues identified by the Department in the enclosed review comments. This will ensure that the EAR sufficiently addresses the requirement,; of Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (F.S.). In part, the Dcpartment's comments focus on the need to revise the EAR to address: (1) assessment of plan objectives for major issues; (2) assessment of corrective actions or plan amendments for the major issues based on the assessment of plan objectives; (3) incomplete information to address community-wide assessment requirements (revised population projections; and changes in growth management laws since 2008); (4) assessment of water supply planning; (5) assessment of past reductions in land use density within the coastal high hazard area; (6) assessment of the extent to which the transportation concurrency exception area and transportation concu....,.cncy management areas have achieved their purposes; and (7) the extent to which changes are needed to develop a common methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing the concurrency management system in coordination with the municipalities and county. The Department encourages the County to make the necessary revisions to the EAR based on the enclosed review comments. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-468-8466 (p) . 850.921-0781 (f) . Website: www.dca.state.fl.us . COMMUNITY PLANNING 650-.488-2356 (p} 850.488-3309 (f) . flORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST 851).922-2207 (p} 850-921-1747 (1) t . HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-486-7956 (p) 850-922-5623 (fJ . The Honorable Fred W. Coyle, Chairman October 15, 2010 Page 2 Please note that a formal sufficiency determination was not conducted at this time; this will be done after the EAR is adopted by the County. However, the review comments, ifnot adequately addressed in the adopted EAR, may serve as sufficiency issues. We have also included a copy of regional and state agency comments for your consideration. With respect to any suggested comprehensive plan an1endments identified in the EAR, the Department's review comments do not constitute a compliance review of the proposed amendments. EAR-based plan amendments suggested in the EAR will be reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Rule 9-J, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), when submitted as proposed plan amendments. As the County prepares thc adopted EAR, Department staff is prcpared to further discuss the issues raised in the review comments. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 487-4545, or Scott Rogers, Principal Planner, at (850) 912-1758. Vz11; }11 cl1--Y Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning MMlsr Enclosures: Review Agency Comments cc: Ken Heatherington, Executive Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Nick Casalanguida, Interim Administrator, Community Development and Environmental Services Division DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMENTS FOR COLLIER COUNTY PROPOSED EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT 1. The identification of major issues and, where pertinent, the potential social, eeonomic, and environmental impacts of these issues [Section 163.3191(2)(e)]: The proposed EAR sufficiently addresses the requirement of Section 163.319l(2)(e), F.S., except with regard to the major issues of "Urban Development Pattem" and "Intergovernmental Coordination" for which the EAR does not identify, where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of the issues. Revise the EAR to identify, where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts relevant to the major issues of Urban Development Pattern and Intergovernmental Coordination. 2, An assessment of whether plan objectives within each element, as they related to major issues, have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and opportunities with respect to major issues in each element [Section 163.3191(2)(g)]; and, Any actious or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address the major issues identified and analyzed in the report [Section 163.3191(2)(i)]: The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address the requirements of Sections 163,3191 (2)(g) and (i), F.S., for the major issues as follows: a. (Major Issue: Climate Change): The proposed EAR identifies many Comprehensive Plan objectives/policies that are relevant to the issue of climate change. However, for many of these objectives/policies, the EAR does not assess the following: (1) how has the objective/policy been implemented over the evaluation period, including specific cxamples of the implementation; (2) why the implementation has been effective or ineffective in achieving the purpose of the objective/policy; and (3) based on 1 and 2, why revisions are needed or not needed to the objective/policy, and identification of the extent/nature of the rcvisions. Revise the EAR to include the assessment. b. (Major Issue: UrbaIl Development Pattern): Thc propos cd EAR section titled "Major Issues" does not address the major issue of "Urban Development Pattern." The section titled "Major Issues does not include an assessment addressing: (1) identification of the plan objectives related to the intergovernmental coordination major issue; (2) evaluation of whether the objectives have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and opportunities with respect to intergovernmental coordination; and (3) evaluation of any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments arc anticipated to address intergovernmental coordination. Revise the EAR to include the assessment. c. (Major Issue: Water Resource Protection): Part of the major issue pertains to floodplain management programs and existing criteria. The proposed EAR section titled "Major Issues" does not include an assessment addressing: (I) identification of the plan objectives related to the floodplain management programs and existing criteria; (2) evaluation of whether the objectives have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and opportunities with respect to the floodplain management programs and existing criteria; and (3) evaluation of any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address floodplain management and existing criteria Revise the EAR to include the assessment. d. (Major Issue: Intergovernmental Coordination): The proposed EAR section titled "Major Issues" does not address the major issue of "Intergovernmental Coordination." The section titled "Major Issues" docs not include an assessment addressing: (I) identification of the plan objectives related to the intergovernmental coordination major issue; (2) evaluation of whether the objectives have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and opportunities with respect to intergovernmental coordination; and (3) evaluation of any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address intergovernmental coordination. Revise the EAR to include thc assessment. e. (Major Issue: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay): The proposed EAR section titied "fv1ajor Issues'" does not sufficiently address the majur issue of "'Rural Laiids Stewardship Area Overlay" (RLSA Overlay) because of the following: (I) the EAR states that, pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22. the County prepared two reports (Report I in 2008, and Report II in 2009) evaluating the RLSA Overlay, hut the EAR does not include Reports I and II or a sufficient summary assessment of Reports I and II for the Department to determine that the evaluation of the effectiveness of the RLSA Overlay is sufficient; and (2) the EAR recommends revisions to Comprehensive Plan policies for the RLSA, but these recommended revisions are not based on a sufficient assessment of the effectiveness of the RLSA Overlay, Revise the EAR to include a complete sufficient assessment of the effectiveness of the RLSA Overlay and to demonstrate that the recommended revisions to policies arc based on the assessment. 3. Population growth and changes in land area [Section 163.3191(2)(a)]: The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address the requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(a) and (i), F.S., because the EAR docs not include revised population projections for the new updated planning timeframe, which the EAR (Future Land Use Element pages 37-38) suggests may be year 2025. The EAR should be revised to include updated population projections to address the new planning timeframe. 4. Relevant changes in growth management laws [Section 163.3191(2)(f)]: The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163.3191 (2)(1), F.S, because the proposed EAR section titled "Statutory Changes" does not identify changes to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, since the year 2008. Revise the section titled "Statutory Changes" to identify the statutory changes since year 2008, 5. An assessment of the extent to which the local government has been snccessful in identifying alternative water supply projects and traditional water supply projects, including conservation and reuse, necessary to meet the water needs identified in Section 373.0361(2)(a) within the local government's jurisdiction. Au evaluation of the degree to which the local government has implemented the work plan for building public, private, and regional water supply facilities, includiug development of alternative water supplies, identified in the element as necessary to serve existing and new development. [Section 163.3191(2)(1)]: The proposed EAR does not include a section that specifically addresses the requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(I), F.S. Revise the EAR to include a section that very briefly addresses the requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(1), F.S, 6. An evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the coastal high hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs. The local government must identify strategies to address redevelopment and the rights of affected residents balanced against public safety considerations. [Section l63.3191(2)(m)]: The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163.3191 (2)(m), F.S. Collier County has coastal high hazard area; however, the proposed EAR does not include an evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the coastal high hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs, and include in such an evaluation the identification of strategies to address redevelopment and the rights of affected residents balanced against public safety considerations. The EAR should be revised to include the evaluation. 7. An evaluation of the extent to which a concurrency management exception area designated pursuant to Section 163.3180(5), a concurrency management area designated pursuant to Section 163.3180(7), or a multimodal transportation district designated pursuant to Section 163.3180(15) has achieved the purpose for which it was created and otherwise complies with the provisions of Section 163.3180. [Section 163.3191(2)(0)]: The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163.3191(2)(0), F.S. Collier County has designated a Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas (South U.S. 41 TCEA) 3Dd two Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (Northwest TCMA; and East Central TCMA), and the proposed EAR does not evaluate the extent to which these areas have achieved the purpose for which they were created and otherwise comply with the provisions of Section 163.3180, F.S. Revise the EAR to include the evaluation. 8. An assessment of the extent to which changes are needed to develop a common methodology for measnring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing its concurrency management system in coordination with the municipalities and counties, as appropriate pursuant to Section 163.3180(10). [Section 163.3191(2)(p)]: The proposed EAR does not include a section that addresses the requirements of Section 163.3191(2)(P), F.S. Revise the EAR to include a section that specifically and sufficiently addresses the requirements of Section 163.3191 (2)(p), F.S. \ SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT October 14, 2010 Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and DRI Processing Department of Commllnity Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Subject: Collier County Comments on Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) transmitted by Collier County (County) for preliminary review The District appreciates the opportunity to provide water resource,related technical assistance during the County's evaluation of major issues and comprehensive plan elements. The County has committed to working with the District in updating the County's adopted Water Supply Facilities Work Plan as the Lower West Coast Regional Water Supply Plan is updated. The District requests the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) consider the following recommendations in its EAR sufficiency analysis: Water Qualitv . Retain the current language of Objective 2.2, in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which requires that surface waters discharging into estuaries shall meet Federal. State, or local water quality standards. The proposed change weakens the objective in providing protection to the County's surface waters. The District looks forward to working with the County on achieving water quality standards within the County's water bodies. . Include an objective and related poiicies describing the strategies (including funding mechanisms) designed to achieve Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) and Nutrient Loading Criteria estabiisl',ed for water bodies in the County. . Incorporate objectives and policies for coordinating with the State in its TMDL program including efforts in assessing the verified list of impaired waters under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and any subsequent TMDLs developed for those waters. This section should also address the planning and implementation of any future Everglades West Coast Basin Management Action Plans developed for water bodies with TMDLs in the Southwest Coast and interdrainage Area Planning Units. 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33-lC6 . (561) 686-8800 . FL WAT51~800-432-2045 M;:;!::-:g .A.:::~:=-ess-:-p.-O.-Bo-x-24680, West Palm-Beachr-EL.33416c:!l:680_~_ww:w,sf.:wn1(;Lgov / M' R,y Eobock" Ad"'c,"'m", 7 October 14, 2010 ,. --, -,._, Page 2 Ecosvstem Restoration . Include objectives and related policies describing planned coordination with the District in implementing the Lake Trafford Critical Restoration Project, Lake Trafford Watershed Management Plan, and Picayune Strand Restoration Project. . Include a policy to emphasize land uses should not be inconsistent with adjacent restoration programs, such as the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). ~ Flood Protection . Incorporate objectives and policies for floodplain management in the Stormwater Management Sub-Element. Floodplain management policies should include the implementation of floodplain management regulations, including provisions for incorporating compensating storage in development plans. . Add a policy to the Immokalee Area IJlaster Plan that provides a requirement for detailed design segments and development of funding mechanisms for the stormwater management improvements identified in the recommended alternatives of the Immokalee Stormwater Management Plan. . Include a policy that addresses coord'nation with the District regarding the use of and/or connection to \^Jorks of the D:s~rict The County must coordinate with the District Right-of-\/Vay Program for a~propriate authorization prior to making use or connecting to WDrks Df the District The cODrdination includes but is not limited to canals and associated Dverbanks and v/ater cDnservatlDn areas. Specific requirements are codified In Chapter 40E-6, FIDrida Administrative Code. Natural Svstems . PrDvide a pDlicy that requires the develDpment of management and restoration plans for the Pepper Ranch ConsecJation Area (Pepper Ranch) to protect its unique terrestrial biota and habitat. Management and restoration plans should be completed prior to incorporating :>2 Pepper Ranch into the County's regional park system. \^v'ater Supply . Describe the programs in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element that provide coordination between the COunty and the other water suppliers to ensure that water supplies will be sufficient to meet projected water demands for the unincorporated areas. ~ /'<7--_-- . _Mr. Ra)'...E..ubaoks, Administrator October 14, 2010 Page 3 , -----~-- The District offers planning and technical assistance to the County and the Department of Community Affairs in developing sound, sustainable solutions to meet the County's future water supply needs and to protect the region's water resources. For assistance or additional information, piease contact Deborah Oblaczynski, Senior Planner, at (561) 682-2544 or doblaczv@sfwmd.qov. Sincerely, ~~ ~ Rod Braun Director Intergovernmental Policy and Planning DiVision South Florida Water Management District c: Mike Bosi, AICP, Collier County Ken Heatherington, AICP, SWFRPC Deborah Oblaczynski, SFWMD Jim Quinn, FDEP Brenda Winningham, DCA -1,--- -\\= - , -:;;;:", Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST (;O\"ER\iOR ] 0)41 Daniels Parkway Fod f',"F?:fS, fL 33913 STEPHAl\JE C. KOPELOl'SOS SECR.ETARY O('/ober R. 2010 Mr. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and Processing Administrator Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399 RE: Collier County Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) - FDOT Recommendations and Comments Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Florida Department of Transporlation (FDOT), District I, has reviewed the Cullier County Proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on September 10, 2010 in accordance with the requirements ofFJorida Statutes (F.S.) Section 163 and Chapter 9J-II of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The department offers DCA the following comments and recommendations for your consideration in review oftne EAR. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (CIE) EAR recommended changes to this element include the following: Renaming of certain clement references. including Sllb~E]ement, Goal, and Objectives and Policies throughout; Policy 1.4 ....revision to introduce reducing Vehicle MJ!es Traveled (VMT) and Green House Gas (GHG) emissions as criterion for funher prioritizing projects; Policy 1.5 ....revisions related to multi-Element revisions in a comprehensive effort to lllanagc redundancy; . Policy 2.10..... considered for revision to allow for morc-responsive fi.scal management; Objective 3 ......minor revision timcframc reference; . Policy 3.1....minor revisions associated with ne\V temlinology'; Policy 4.1....minor revisions to provide updated Statuwry cite; Polic)' 4.2 .".revision to provide updated reference site; IJoIicy 4.6 ....minor re\'lsions associated with nc-w tenninology; Policy 5.l....minor revisions associated with ne\'I" tem1inology (may need minor revisions to provide updated Statuto!). cite). The department has the follo\','ing comments on these recommended changes: Pf)OT Comment # 1: For cJanfication, Pulicy 1.5 (A) (I) (included in page 5) ofthe CIE should berevised to specifically indicate that the peak hour Level of Service (LOS) standard of"E" does not apply to roadways on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS), Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), Emerging Strategic www.dot.state.tlus Mr. Eubanks -- -~---- Collier County Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments October 8, 2010 Page 2 of7 Intennodal System (ESIS), and non-state roadway facIlities funded by the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP). FDOT Commellf # 2: Please revise Policy 1.5 (A) (2) (included in page 5) of the crn to indicate that the peak hour LOS standard of"O" does not apply to state arterials and collectors on the FlHS, SIS, ESIS, and TRIP funded roadways. FDOT Comment # 3: Consistent with Comments # I and # 2, please re\ise Policy 1.5 (B) (included in page 5) ofthc CIE to indicate that FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for all FlHS, SIS, ESIS, and TRIP funded roadways including 1-75 (SIS), S.R. 29 (ESIS) and S.R. 82 (SIS). FDOT Comment # 4: The dcpartment recommends that Policy IS (B) of the CIE be expand cd to include language indicating that the LOS standard on the ESIS facilities S.R. 29 (1,75 to Ihe Hend,y Counly Lille) and S.R. 82 (Hendry Counly Line 10 SR. 29) should be LOS "C' consi<tcnt witb the standards set forth by the FDOT. Also, the LOS standards on 1,75 from the Broward County Line to S.R. 951 should be LOS "B" and from S.R. 951 to Lee County should be LOS "0" corresponding to rural and urbanized area, respectively. l TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (TE) EAR recommended changes to this clement include the follO\~-ing: . Policy 3.4 ....modifications to provide more flexibility in policy: . Policy 3.5 ....revision to eliminate time frame for achicying policy; . Policy 4.9 ....addition of new policy to address HB697; . Policy 5.1 ....revision to provide clarification and 3pplicability of policy: . Policy 5.3 .... modifications to provide expanded applicability of policy: . Policy 5.5 ....modifications to provide for monitoring: . Policy 5.6 ....modifications to provide for monitoring; . Policy 5.8.... modifications to improve effectiveness of policy: . Policy 5.9 ....delction based upon action accomplished: . Polic)' 6.2 ....revision to tcnninology within policy; . Policy 6.3 ....rcvision to pro\ide clarity to policy; . Policy 6.5 ....revisions to update lIst of projects identified; . Policy 7.3 ....modifications to expand applicability of policy; . Policy 7.4 ....modification to recognize the requirement to jmpl~ment BB697: . Policy 7.5 ....revision to recognize on~going efforts of the policy; . Policy 9.3 ....revision to provide clarity of policy:; . Policy 12.8.....dclction based upon transit systems exempt from concurrency. The Department has the following comments on these recommended changes: FDOT Commel1l # 5: Plcase revise Policy 1.3 in tlIe Transp0I1ation Element to be consistent with Policy 1.5 in tbe CIE. Please see FDOT Comments # I and # 2. FDOT Comment # 6: Please revise Policy 1.4 in the Transportation Element to :,C consistent with Policy 1.5 (B) of the ClEo Please see FDOT Comment # 3. FDOT Comment # 7: The department recommends that Policy].4 of the Transportation Element be expanded to include language indicating that the LOS standard on the ESIS facilities S.R. 29 (1,75 to the HendlY County Line) and S.R. 82 (Hendl}' Count)' Line 10 S.R. 29) should be LOS "C" consistent with the W\\"IV.dOl.state .tl.us r / / Mr. Eubanks -- -------- ------------- -- --------------- Collier County Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments October 8, 2010 Page 3 of 7 standards set forth by the FDOT. Also, the LOS standarcis on 1-75 from Broward County Line to S.R. 951 should bc LOS "B" and from S.R. 95110 Lec Coonty scould be LOS "D" corresponding to rural and urbanized area, respectively. FDOT Comment # 8: Consistent with :he Collier COU:1:Y Planning Commission (Cepe) comment from the August 25, 20 I 0 EAR \Vorkshop, the departm::::Jt recoIT......-:1t'nds that a time frame be detcnnined to accomplish Policy 3.5 of the Transportation Element. FDOT Comment # 9: The department notes that the L\R identifies the need to modify Policy 5. I of the Transportation Element to clarify the fol1ov..'ing tcnns (j[1.j cnnccrts: "Sign[(icallt~v impacled road segmenl and d((icicl1! as il rcla/ed to file County adopted ::oYr2/' -_~"-(;", "/.II/ligation and hO"I';f should be applied', and "what happens I-vhen mi/;gatiol1 allows a projec! J() he (.-::';sistcn! wi,h this policy". FDOT COII/lllent # 10: The department recommend, rr.er the Icnns and concepts c1arificd in Policy 5.1 be consistent with the Florida Administrativc Code and Fk:-;da St3t'JCS, and that appropriate references be cited accordingly. FDOT Comment # 11: The department notes 1h3t the ,:-.,,-'difica:ion to provide for monitoring relating to Policy 5.S is mistakenly placed within Policy 5.6 lind sr.,".lld he brought under Policy 5.5. FDOT Comment # 12: The ckpartmcnl notes that the ;-:-,~-,jificaTi()n to provide for monitoring relating to Policy 5.6 is not found in the document and shu'Jld be ~:'.J:Jded. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATlO:\ ELDIE:\T (ICE) EAR recommended changes to this clement includc lhe fo]Ll\\-lng: Objcctiyc 1 .... minor revisions to include certain k~:, 2.gcneic5; Policy 1.2 ....revision to reflec! the DcpJ!1m':'rlt narr:~> d1J.ngc: . P{)iic~' 1.3. ..revisioIl tu reflect the DcparIIlll';ll !lam: lnange: . Polic~' 2.1 ....inclusion of the v,'ord ..'-;/?)rnr....'~','c" so ::-:2t agreements arc not limited to agencies within Collier Counly; Policy 2.6 . Policy 2.7 . Policy 2.8 ....minor text revisions to UpJ,itl' d<i'.cs; ....minor text revisions to update dates aild :--cquircmcnts; .revisiun to concet SF\\:\1D !J,ilTIC: Policy 2.9 ....minor text revisions to include a C(lmn:.:. :nd delete specific Florida Statute sub-section. These revisions do not impact state wCldways and, thcr('fo'!"~'. :he dcpzu1l11Cnt offers no comments. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) EAR rccOlmncnued changes to this ekmcnt include ihc foll,,~-,;.l!lg: . Policy 1.4. . revise to allow for, but not m2:ldatc. 1:-,;:, ,-.re-ation ofa District (perhaps replace "shall" l\"irh ..may''); . Policy 2.1....rcvisc to correct the eIE Polin reference: . Polic)' 2.4 ....if changes arc made to the Dcsity R3~:~g System to delete the Traffic Congestion Area density' reduction factor as proposed. then re\:c;e thi;;; p:-licy to delete that reference; Policy 1.5 ....revise to reflect the existence of the TC.\L-\s (perhups replace "shall designate" on/irst linE ,fitII "has designated'); Policy 4.5 ....revise to recognize the periodic updatel:'!i:rhaps replace {he last sentence with a commitment ro pcrioJicnl(v updare the inventOJyi; \\'\,.\\.dot.S:l::.;..::.t1.US / /., Mr. Eubanks ------.~- -~~~~---.. Collier County Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments Oelober 8, 20 I 0 Page 4 of? . Policy 4,7 ""revise to specifY that a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless first approved by the Board, and to add reference to the lnunokalee Redevelopment Plan; . Policy 5.3 ""revise to clarifYchangcs to the Urban designation refers to the new desib'TIation of lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" inlhe lhird /ine ll'ilh "addilion "): . Policy 5.14 ..n. revise as necessary to reflect the changed status and contents of the Inter-local Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate witb the Public School Facilities Element; . Objective 6.... revise to refercnce the establishment ofTCM:\s in past tense (perhaps replace "are hereby" in/he last .'lenIence with "have been "); . Policy 6.3 ....revise paragraph c) to begin with a ,cro so as to follow the sentence structure (perhaps add "Providing" bejore "Vehicular "); . Objective 7 ......revise to reference reduction of gTC';;,nhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce greenhollse gas emissions, " on the second !;nc a.fitr "policies. "); Policy 7.3 ....revise for proper wording (perhaps replace "and IlIei,- in!ercrmnC'cliol1 poinls" willi "and/or provide in{erco!1neclions(~) "); Policy 7.7 ....revise to update the Division name: . Office and In-fill Commercial Subdistrict ..... rc\'i~c criterion" J" regarding its applicability; . Density Rating System - Residential In,fiIl.....rc\ I>e to eliminate Transfer of Density Rights (TDR) requirement; . Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area..... delele and replace with a Coastal High Hazard Arca (CHHA) density reduction factor, reOect this on the RUM, make correlating changes to all Growth Management Plan (GMP) references to this provision, make correlating changes to the FLUM to modify the four partial residential density bands within the Urban Residential Subdistrict to complete circular brands, rc\'i:,e both the Roadway ,A.ccess and Prox;nity to !\lixcd U,c ,f..ctivity Center or Interchange Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuse~ to rcp13cc refereDce to this provision with CHHA reference, and revise the Conversion of Comrnercl31 Bonus to prohibit its applications within the CHHA; . Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict ..... revise to reduce allov.'able density for residential-only projccts within the CHHA to a maximum of 4 DU .-\ and re'.ise the Master Planned ActiVIty Centcr provision for clarity and possible substantive chang~: Rural Fringe Mixed Use District ..... revise to cbrify that the District only applies to A,zoned lands, to correct a miss-numbering in the RFMUD Sending Lands designation, and revise the Exemption provision to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and to d~kte unneeded text from the Exemption title; . Bayshorc/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Oyerlay ...... revise to delete subparagraph 8.c.; . Future Land Use Map and Map Series ..... revise :he CHHA boundary to correlate with any CHHA boundary description change made in CCME Polil':'- 12.2.5. revIse to update and concct as necessary underlying details of some FLUM series maps, re., iiC one or more maps to correlate with past map changes on related maps, rcvise Stewardship Overi,y Map to add additional approved Stewardship Scnding Area and to correct the boundaries of SS-\ c7. revise FLUM to correct the depiction of certain boundaries in the eastern portions of the County, <i7Jd revise FLUM legend to depict the (non-Aclil'ily Center) interchange feature; Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistriet......re\ is., to delete paragraph "p'.; . Davis Boulevard/County Barn Road llsc Subdistrict ..... fe\'ise to correct a date reference; Planning Horizon Issue..... revise the various pla..rming horizons in the GJ\.-1P 10 be consistent; . Designation/District/Subdistrict Relationship .... n;visions throughout to clarify the relationship behveen Designations, Districts, and Sub-districts, ~- , \v\vw.dot.:3:3tc.fl.us ,. Mr. Eubanks Collier Counly Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments October 8, 2010 Page 5 uf? The Department has,the following comments on these recommended changes: FDOT Comment # 13: (Density Rating System - Residential In,fill) It is not clear how much additional development could occur should the elimination of the TDR requirement to qualify for the Residential Infill bonus density occur. Should substantial aoditiom.1 d'~Yc]opme:1t occur from this amendment, the department recommends that an area wide traffic study be CO:ld'Jcted and supporting documentation be provided to establish that adequate capacity will be 3YJilahlc fen 11C\'-,' trips that will impact state facilities for the long- term horizon year and short-term year 2015 condi:ic'i1S. FDOT Comment # 14: (Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area) Please provide analyses to establish the impact of deleting the Trame Cong('~:iJn Ar'~a Density reduction factor and replacing it with the Coastal High Hazard Area reduction factclL Shouj,~ s,ubst"mtial additional development occur from tbis amendment, the department n:commcnds that an A.r<.'3 V/ide Traffic Study be conducted and supporting documentation provided to establish that adequate C2p3City will be available for nev,' trips that \\}ill impact state facilities for the long-term horizon year and ~~h)n--tenn year :015 conditions. GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLA" I(;CA~IP) EAR recommended changes to the GGAMP Elcmcn: ;~.:]ude the following: Goal 1 .... reformatting; re-stale to cajYLHC cs~',:;',-'", of subsequent Objec1ives and Policics; Objective 1.1 ......rcformatling: Policy 1.1.5 ..may be deleted; . Policy 1.1.6 .may be deleted or relocated; . Policy 1.2.2 ......revisions to identify another specific activity able 10 benefit from altemativL: financing, and re-emphasize balanced transpOr1Jtion plan:img efforts; Policy 1.2.4... "reformatting; Objective 1.3 ......reformatting; Policy 1.3.] .. ...minor revisions to pro\'idc I1C,\ J::p311:ncnlal references; Objective 1.4... ..reformatting; Policy 1.4.J ......eonsider expanding to ensure :vmprchcnsivc and uniform application of LDC; . Objective 2.1...... reformatting:; Policy 2.1.1. ....delete (no longer app/icohle): Policy 2.1.2 ......minor revision 10 upd3te tcnn::c' ()~v: Policy 2.1.3 .. ....delete (no longer apphcah/c): Policy 2.1.4.. ...delete (110 longer appiicohlc): Objective 2.2 ......revisions 10 shO\v nomainin~ ~":forts following major project completion, and rcfom1atting; PoUe}' 2,2.1 . . ._dcktc (110 1()lJgr'r (If'f'.J:r'ahlr"1 l'olicy 2.2.2. .delete (no longer app/icahlc): Objective 3.1......consider rnodificaticnlo str~r:gthcn this Objective and its subsequent Policy in demonstrating support for reducing V\1T 3nd C;HG emissions, and reformatting; Objective 4.1 ......reformatting; Policy 4.1.1......revisions to delete mSildatc to complete a date-specific task; . Policy 4.1.2 ......revisions to delete mandate to complete 3 date-specific task; . Policy 4.1.3. ....revisions to delete lTILlfldatc to c:<Jrnplc:c a d3!c-"pecific task; \\-\\'W_d,:\t.Slatc.tlus Mr. Eubanks ., ,.. ~,....' Collier County Proposed EAR - FDOT Recommendations and Comments October 8, 20 I 0 Page 6 of7 . Objective 5.1......consider minor revision to show use of existing resource, revisions to delete mandate to complete a date,specific task, re,state 10 capture essence of subsequent Policy, consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions, and reformatting; . Policy S.l.I......consider minor revision to sho\\- use of existing resource, revisions to better support its Objective, and refonnatting; . Objective 5.2...... minor revision to be more incJusi\'c of jurisdictions under the Plan, and rcfonnatting; . Policy 5.2.1 ......minor revision for clarity, consider modifications to strengthen this Policy in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions, and refonnaning; . Policy 5.2.2 ......revisions to delete mandate to corr,plcle ada1c-specific task, consider minor revision to show use of existing MPO resource and consider modification to strengthen this Policy in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions: Policy 5.2.3 ......minor revision to shO\v remaining efforts following major project completion; Objective 5.3 ...... consider minor revision to sho\\- me of existing resource, and refonnatting; . Policy 5.3.2 ......minor revision to strengthen pres-.:r;ation efforts: . Goal 6 ....consider modification 10 strengthen this Goal, and its subsequent Objectives and Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions; Objective 6.1...... consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions and revisions to illustrate expanded planning efforts for more mobility options, and refonnaning; . Policy 6.1.1 .....,minor revision 10 illustrate expanded planning efforts, and refonnalling; Policy 6~1.2 ......minor revision to reflect continuing efforts bch,,-'een agencies: . Objective 6.2 ...consider modification to strcng-JlClI. this Objective and its subsequent Policies in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHCJ emissions, and rcfonnatting; . Objective 6.3......rcformatting; . Policy 6.3.1 ......minor revision to delete mandate 1O complete a date-specific task; . Policy 6.3.2 ......minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-~pccific task; . Objective 7.1...... refonnatting; . Policy 7.1.3. ....revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; . Objective 7.2.. ...reformatting; Policy 7.2.1.... .minor revi~ion; . Policy 7.2.2 ......minor revision 10 eliminate duplication of activities; Objective 7.3 ......re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies; consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies in demo:1strating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions, and refonnatting; . Policy 7.3.1......minor revision to illustrate expanded pl~nning efforts; . Policy 7.3.4 ......minor revision 10 delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; . GGAMP Objective......new recommendation based on 2009 adoptions ofHB 697 and the County Energy Audit & GHG Inventory; . GGAMP Policy..... new recommendation to follow County Energy Audit & GHG Inventory; . GGAMP ....,assessment of Select Provisions; W\\W.dl)l.-::tate.f1.lIs " ~jl~~~:~~ty Proposed F~ - FDOT ~~~~';,;;'~nda:io~;';~d~~mm;n;; October 8. 20] 0 Page 7 of7 . Estates - Mixed Use District (Conditional Uses Subdistrict) .... revision to encompass all essential service uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area and expa:1d the referenced tistcd zoning districts to encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates; . Estates - Commercial District (Randall Boule,"ard Commercial Subdistrict).....,revision to replace the tcrn1 "shopping center" v/ith reference to C-2 U5es. These revisions do not impact state roadways and, therdore, the department offers no comments. IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT (L-\.~IP) EAR recommended changes to IA!\.1P Element include lrlc following: . The lAMP Element of the GMP is currently in the process of revising and replacing each existing Goal, Objective and Poi icy of the lAMP, as well as re\'i~i:1g and replacing ail future land use designations on the lAMP and lAMP FLUM. The lAMP is expected 1(, be adopted in the first quarter of 201 I .The proposed plan intends to increase density and intensity as th~ main mcchclllism to promote economic development \vithin the ImmokaJcc Urban Area The department has the following comments on these rccc,:nmendcd changes: FDOT Comment # 15: The changes to the IA\1P E!cr:lcnt han" the (1otential to create an increase in vehicle trips on state road\~lay facilities. The departmenl rccc!~~mcnds that an Area \Vide Traffic Study be conducted and supporting documentation provided for the 3bo\(~ f;:>fcrcnccd 2.mcndmcnts to establish that adequate capacity will be available for new trips that may il11pa::t state fOJdways for the long-tenn horizon year and short-term year 2015 c.:onditiolls. Funding sources sho:J.ld be identified for improvements required to alleviate all short-term failures. The improvements needed to achieye and maintain the adopted LOS standard through the year 2015 (short term) should be included in a Fi\,-'- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. For long- term failures, appropri2.tc policies ~boL!ld be i!ld':::n!ifi::,J !!l 111(;' C"IE (If Tran~r(l!1ati(\n Element ()fthe Comprdl'~n~ive Plan and the needed impr0\Tments ::-:-:'Juld bt~' added to the appropriate plans and programs. Additional Commcnt: FDOT Comment # 16: Analyses and data should b::: ;:ro\"ided for ::dl state road\vay facilities for the current year (20 I 0) and the long-term horizon year pnOl to ,"sure that all ESIS, SIS, FIHS, and non,state roadways with improvements funded through the TRIP adhere to the adopted FDOT LOS swndards and to the roadway capacities found in the FDOT 2009 Generalized LOS Tables. If alternative capacities arc used for any ESlS, SIS, FIHS, or TRIP facilities, please provide surpor.mg: doc1Jmcr,tation fnr review showing the derivation of the alternative capacity. Please pro\'idc rolicics'plar:~ ~(l Tcnwoy (iny nlilurcs projected for state roadways in the horizon year. If you have any questions, or should clarification 0:- JdJill,-1:-'_al infurm~ltiun he n:.::.:dcd, please contact me at (239) 461-4300 or 1:-I\\'r:.JJS:_~J]Ji!~~'1-::'_iu1.ut. <l.i!~',t1J~~;. SiIlCl';~':::. _..;;--.--.....,,------- ,_ -~. ....;~~f:......~~ ----y:il'-:~ -~ LLM/f!nv:<;;I1/h La\\TCTL-';:' \1assey Di~lril'l 1 Growlh \1anagcment Coordinator \\'W\\' .dOl.5~<.ltC.n.us \ .------ .. .. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Dawn K. Roberts Interim Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES September 29, 2010 Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399,2100 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Collier County Evaluation and Appraisal Report Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to this agency's responsibilities under Section 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J- 5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document. Our cursory review indicates that historic resources are addressed in the Countywide Assessment of various elements within the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), but not specifically addressed as Major Issues. In the CDuntyw,de Assessment, Policy 3.5 of the Housing Element addresses the Old Naples area and the protection and preservation of the residential character. This policy has not yet been achieved, but remains relevant. The recommendation is to add a due date so as to make this policy measureable. Objective 5 of this element goes into more depth regarding historic resources and indicates that the county and City of Naples will monitor all identified significant historic resources annually to ensure that these resources are being maintained. This objective is proposed to be retained, along with implementing policies. Implementing policies include maintaining significant historic structures by means of the provision of technical assistance; the review of land development regulations to encourage protection and preservation of historic structures; iocal designation of significant resources; and potential incentives to encourage preservation of historic housing. The last policy has not yet been achieved as incentives to maintain and rehabilitate historic homes have not been adopted. 11 i 1- In the Conservation and Coastal Management Element assessment, Objective 11.1 addresses the protection of both archaeological sites and historic properties in the county. Implementing policies considered relevant and to be retained include the continued enforcement of development regulations; no loss of historic or archaeological resources on county,owned property and protection of resources on private property; and fortuitous finds during construction activities and the appropriate measures to ensure assessment and evaluation of the resource, including preservation if appropriate. We note that in Policy 11.1.2.c, mention is made of (he excavation of archaeological resources by the Division of Historical Resources. This agency does not conduct excavations on private property. 500 S. Bronough Street. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 . http://,yww.flheritage.com LJ Director's Office 850.245,6300. FAX: 245.6436 o Archaeological Reseauh.--__-:--"'--Histodc Preser"Vanon -==-===----==_::::.:.::::::______ 850.245_6444' FA-X: 2..l5.6-t52 . ----85-0.245.6333. FAX;-245.6H7 ~ , _ ..-c.. -~.,,:'-.........-=-.._~..,.; ~. . " '0./' , ~ rf ~~---- - iP- -~- Mr. Eubanks September 29, 2010 Page 2 In the Future land Use Element, Policy 3.1.h, regarding land Development Regulations, provides for the protection of historically significant properties, and lists the various means for protection of these properties. This policy is proposed to be retained. Our cursory review suggests that no major changes are proposed for the protection and preservation of significant archaeological sites and historic properties. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the Division's Compliance Review staff at 850.245.6333. Sincerely, ~ Ii. 4./JUJl..VL-&L- Laura A. Kammerer. Historic Preservationist Supervisor Compliance Review Section Bureau of Historic Preservation pc: Ms. Brenda ".'\'inningham < I [ " ,,_ U=F- , i I THE THIRD EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT BCC-Adoption Edition Table of Contents Section Pages Introduction Chapter One - Public Participation Chapter Two - County Wide Assessment Population Growth & Annexation Existing v. Anticipated Development Vacant & Developable Land Statutory Changes Concurrency Management Methodology Capital Improvement Element (CIE) - Summary Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Transportation Element (TE) - Summary Transportation Element (TE) Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element - Summary Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element - Summary Potable Water Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element - Summary Drainage Solid Waste Sub-Element - Summary Solid Waste Sub-Element Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element - Summary Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element Housing Element - Summary Housing Element Recreation & Open Space Element - Summary Recreation & Open Space Element Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) - Swnmary Conservation & Coastal Management Element Intergovernmental Coordination Element - Summary Intergovernmental Coordination Element Future Land Use Element - Summary Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Area Master Plan - Summary Golden Gate Area Master Plan Immokalee Area Master Plan i-xvi 1-35 1-2 1-32 1-4 1-20 1 1-2 1-10 1-2 1-13 1-2 1-21 1-2 1,20 1-2 1-9 ]-2 1-9 ]-2 1-13 ]-3 ]-13 ]-2 1,23 1-6 ]-54 ] ]-]2 ],2 1-23 1-4 ]-27 ]-7 Economic Element - Summary Economic Element Public Schools Facilities Element - Summary Public Schools Facilities Element Chapter Three - Major Issues Water Resource Protection Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Rural Lands Stewardship Area Climate Change Affordable Housing Concurrency Management Urban Development Patterns Intergovernmental Coordination 1-2 1-6 ] ]-4 )-35 1-9 1-10 1-31 1-8 1- 34 ),15 1,5 THE THIRJ) .EV ALUA TION & APPRAISAL REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN * INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES I. Introduction & Process In 1923 the Florida State Legislature created Collier County from a portion of Lee county, Collier County is located on the southern gulf coast of the Florida peninsula, due west of the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale area. Naples, located in the western coastal area of Collier County, is the most populous of the three incorporated cities in Collier County. City of Marco Island, the second most populous incorporated city, is a barrier island located on the Gulf Coast directly south of Naples, Everglades City located southeast of Naples and the gateway to Ten Thousands Islands is the smallest of the three incorporated cities both in size and population. Collier County contains approximately 2,025 square miles of land area. The sub-tropical climate of Collier County enjoys an average annual temperature of approximately 75 degrees Fahrenheit, with January and June average temperatures of 67 and 82 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. The County is bordered by five counties: Miami-Dade, Broward, Lee, Hendry and Monroe. Ch.arIott. Monro. '" o~ Collier County Government A five-member Board of County Commissioners, elected for terms of four years. governs Collier County. Each Commissioner is elected by and represents a particular district within the County. The Board of County Commissioners hires a County Manager, who oversees the County government departments and staff. It is the function of the County Manager's office to head the daily operations of the government in order to provide exceptional services to the citizens of and visitors to Collier County . Chapter 163, Part 11, Florida Statutes. F.S., also known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act, requires all local governments within the State of Florida to maintain comprehensive planning programs based upon an adopted local government comprehensive plan. As part of this process, the local government must monitor changing conditions and must use this information to guide periodic amendments to the local comprehensive plan, The periodic amendment process, which occurs once every seven years, as described in Chapter 163.3191, F.S., is a two-phase process. It begins with the preparation, by the local government. of an Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR). The EAR evaluates the performance of the various Elements of the local government comprehensive plan since the previous EAR-based amendment process, It assesses the successes and failures of the various Goals, Objectives, Policies and programs included within the local comprehensive plan and provides recommendations for necessary changes. Additionally, the EAR is the primary means by which the local plan can respond to changes in federal, state or regional planning requirements. Ultimately, the recommendations contained in the EAR become the basis of proposed amendments to the local government comprehensive plan. These EAR-based amendments, as adopted by the local governing board and found in compliance with the Chapter] 63, Part 11, F.S., then become part of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the local plan until the next EAR is prepared in seven years. Collier County's first EAR was prepared and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 16, 1996. The subsequent EAR-based amendments were adopted on October] 8. ] 997. The second EAR was prepared and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 27, 2004. The subsequent EAR-based amendments were adopted on July 28, 2006, This third EAR reviews the performance of Collier County's Growth Management Plan (GMP) from July, 2004 to July. 2010. 'Note: "Collier County Growth Management Plan" is the adopted title for the Comprehensive Plan as cited in Chapter 163, Part 11. F.S. The two terms are in common use throughout this EAR and are interchangeable. E.A.R. Requirements As required by Section 163.3191 F .5., the EAR must address the following aspects of the GMP: 1. The planning program shall be a continuous and ongoing process. Each local government shall adopt an evaluation and appraisal report once every 7 years assessing the progress in implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. Furthermore, it is the intent of this section that: (a) Adopted comprehensive plans are reviewed through such evaluation process to respond to changes in state, regional, and local policies on planning and growth management and changing conditions and trends, to ensure effective intergovernmental coordination, and to identify major issues regarding the community's achievement of its goals. (b) After completion of the initial evaluation and appraisal report and any supporting plan amendments, each subsequent evaluation and appraisal report must evaluate the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the initiation of the evaluation and appraisal report process. 11 (c) Local governments identifY the major issues. if applicable, with input from state agencies, regional agencies, adjacent local governments, and the public in the evaluation and appraisal report process. It is also the intent of this section to establish minimum requirements for information to ensure predictability, certainty, and integrity in the growth management process. The report is intended to serve as a summary audit of the actions that a local government has undertaken and identifY changes that it may need to make. The report should be based on the local government's analysis of major issues to further the community's goals consistent with statewide minimum standards. The report is not intended to require a comprehensive rewrite of the elements within the local plan, unless a local government chooses to do so. (2) The report shall present an evaluation and assessment of the comprehensive plan and shall contain appropriate statements to update the comprehensive plan, including, but not limited to, words, maps, illustrations, or other media, related to: (a) Population growth and changes in land area, including annexation, since the adoption of the original plan or the most recent update amendments. (b) The extent of vacant and developable land, (c) The financial feasibility of implementing the comprehensive plan and of providing needed infrastructure to achieve and maintain adopted level-of-service standards and sustain concurrency management systems through the capital improvements element, as well as the ability to address infrastructure backlogs and meet the demands of !o"rowth on public services and facilities. (d) The location of existing development in relation to the location of development as anticipated in the original plan, or in the plan as amended by the most recent evaluation and appraisal report update amendments, such as within areas designated for urban growth. (e) An identification of the major issues for the jurisdiction and, where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts. (f) Relevant changes to the state comprehensive plan, the requirements of this part, the minimum criteria contained in chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the appropriate strategic regional policy plan since the adoption of the original plan or the most recent evaluation and appraisal report update amendments. (g) An assessment of whether the plan objectives within each element, as they relate to major issues, have been achieved. The report shall include, as appropriate, an identification as to whether unforeseen or unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems or opportunities with respect to major issues identified in each element and the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the issue. (h) A brief assessment of successes and shortcomings related to each element of the plan. (i) The identification of any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address the major issues identified and analyzed in the report. Such identification shall include. as appropriate, new population projections, new revised planning timeframes, a revised future conditions map or map series, an updated capital improvements element, and any new and revised goals, objectives, and policies for m'tior issues identified within each element. This paragraph shall not require the submittal of the plan amendments with the evaluation and appraisal report. (j) A summary of the public participation program and activities undertaken by the local government in preparing the report. (k) The coordination of the comprehensive plan with existing public schools and those identified in the applicable educational facilities plan adopted pursuant to s. lill3.35. The assessment shall address, where relevant, the success or failure of the coordination of the future land use map and associated planned residential development with public schools and their capacities. as well as the joint decision-making processes engaged in by the local government and the school III board in regard to establishing appropriate population projections and the planning and sitting of public school facilities. For those counties or municipalities that do not have a public schools interlocal agreement or public school facilities element. the assessment shall determine whether the local government continues to meet the criteria of s. 163.3177(12). If the county or municipality determines that it no longer meets the criteria, it must adopt appropriate school concurrency goals, objectives. and policies in its plan amendments pursuant to the requirements of the public school facilities element. and enter into the existing interlocal agreement required by ss. J 6~.3172(6)(h)2. and Ih}} 17T7 in order to fully participate in the school concurrency system. (I) The extent to which the local government ha~ been successful in identifying alternative water supply projects and traditional water supply projects, including conservation and reuse. necessary to meet the water needs identified in s.,n,Q}(l] (2)(a) within the local government's jurisdiction. The report must evaluate the degree to which the local government has implemented the work plan for building public, private, and regional water supply facilities, including development of altcrnativc watcr supplies, identified in the element as necessary to serve existing and new dcvelopmcnt. (m) If any of the jurisdiction of the local government is located within the coastal high-hazard area, an evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs, including, but not limited to, redevelopment following a natural disaster. The property rights of current residents shall be balanced with public safety considerations. The local government must identify. strategies to address redevelopment feasibility and the property rights of affected residents. These strategies may include the authorization of redevelopment up to the actual built density in existenee on the property prior to the natural disaster or redevelopment. (n) An assessment of whether the criteria adopted pursuant to s. 1,~"}.LI"(6)(a) were suceessful in achieving CUiilpatibility ""ith fnilitaf) installations. (0) The extent to which a eoncurrency exeeption area designated pursuant to s. i().i",3.l~(i(5), a eoneurreney management area designated pursuant to s. U',;'L~{J(7). or a multimodal transportation district dcsignatcd pursuant to s. :,0'.' I Xi ,( 15) has achieved the purpose for which it was created and otherwise complies with the provisions of s. It",. "JS,( I (p) An assessment of the extent to which ehanges are needed to develop a common methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing its concurrency management system in coordination with the municipalities and counties, as appropriate pursuant to s. i( 10). Or2anization of the EAR The 2011 EAR is organized into a single,bound report containing an introduction and three (3) major chapters. These chapters are: Chapter 1 - Public Participation & Issues Identified Chapter 2 - Countywide Assessment Chapter 3 -Evaluation of Major Issues Chapter I details the issues that were brought to the proeess from the public during the "Public Participation" portion of the EAR process. Chapter 2 addresses required areas of analysis as required by Florida Statutes 163.319\, as well as reviews of the individual OMP elements. Chapter 3 evaluates IV the eight (8) major issues, as agreed upon between Collier County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Schedule Completed Tasks To-Date: . On August 26,2009, County staff attended a workshop, at the offices ofthe Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, in North Fort Myers to meet with DCA representatives and representatives from other state and regional agencies to discuss the EAR process, learn of issues considered important by the DCA staff, and to learn how neighboring local governments intended to respond to issues identified by the State. . On September 8, 2009, Comprehensive Planning hosted an EAR intergovernmental meeting. The meeting offered an opportunity to fellow staff from local City agencies to identify and discuss areas of concern with respect to intergovernmental items or issues common to fellow governments. In addition, this meeting provided an opportunity to discuss sharing data, to discuss new data that must be generated, and the analysis necessary to address those issues identified as outdated, problematic. or where compliance has not occurred or is no longer practi cal. . On November 24,2009 the County's Draft Letter of Understanding was submitted to the DCA. The County and the DCA agreed to the Final Letter of Understanding on December 4, 2009. On December 15, 2009, at their regular scheduled public hearing, the Collier Board of County Commissioners approved the Letter of Understanding between the County and DCA. . On January 25, 2010, the County held its first EAR public participation meeting at the North Naples Regional Park. . On February 23, the County held its second EAR public participation meeting at the University ofFloridalCollier County Agricultural Extension Office. . On March 15, 2009, the County held its third and final public participation meeting at the Collier County main government complex. . The varied locations of the three public partICIpation meetings were designed to provide opportunity to participate in the EAR process to the greatest possible number of citizens. In conjunction with the public participation meetings, Comprehensive Planning staff coordinated the preparation of the EAR with other County agencies, while gathering and analyzing data to be used in the report. . From January 2010 through July 2010, staff finalized the various sections of the Report. . On August 11,2010, the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) held an EAR workshop at the Collier County main government complex. v . On August 25 and 27, 2010 the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held EAR workshops. The public discussions at these publieally noticed workshops formed the basis for a number of modifications to the report. . On September 10.20]0, the County provided the post EAC and CCPC EAR workshop report to the DCA and various state agencies for a courtesy review. . On October 15,2010 the County received the DCA's comments based upon the post EAC and CCPC EAR workshop repOJ1 . On November 3. 2010 the EAC recommended to the BCC to adopt the EAR adoption report and to transmit to the DCA by unanimous vote. . On December 7. 20] 0 the CCPC will hold recommended to the BCC to adopt the EAR adoption report and to transmit to the DCA by unanimous vote. . The BCC will hold its adoption hearing on January 31, 2011. . The adopted EAR will be submitted to the DCA and the various review agencies within ten business days. after changes approved by the BCC at its January 31, 201] public hearing have been incorporated into this EAR. . Upon receiving the County's adopted EAR, the DCA will commence review of the report for sufficiency with Chapter 163.3] 91. The tentative date for the DCA's Suilicieney Letter determination is on or about April 27, 20] I. . Within eighteen months Crom the date the EAR is lc1Und in compliance by the DCA the County will adopt the EAR based GMP amcndments. Before progressing to the individual assessmcnts oCthe objcctives and policies ofGMP and analysis of the identified major issues for the 20 I] EAR, the County would like to provide a bricf description of long range planning efforts undertaken since the date of the last EAR effort. These described cfforts were/are designed to improve thc effectivcncss of thc GMP in attaining its stated goals within its various clemcnts. Horizon Study The East of County Road 951 Infrastructure and Services Ilorizon Study was a fivc year long planning effort to assess the County's ability to accommodate gnm1h within the County's rural eastern portion. Prior to the initiation of the Study. the regulatory framework for groV\1h in the eastern portion of the County was established with the adoption of the Rural Fringe Overlay and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay within the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Overlays were the regulatory solutions arrived upon by the County and the state in response to Final Order No. AC99- 002. With the framework for groV\1h in place and the consistent population increases in the 1990's and the first three years of this decade. the Collier Board of County Commissioners at its June 29. 2004 meeting recognized the need for a comprehensive. long range planning effort to evaluatc thc county's fiscal ability to accommodate growth permitted by the newly adopted regulations within the arca East of County Road 951. A strong cmphasis was placed on the County's ability (0 provide the potential VI necessary capital infrastructure and services while maintaining the financial feasibility as set forth in the level of service standards contained within the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). To accomplish the task, the Horizon Study was separated within two Phases. The first phase, the Horizon Study Preliminary Report, was an effort of estimating the cost of providing infrastructure and services for the amount of growth our adopted regulations would permit. The Comprehensive Planning Department with the "2005 Build-Out Study" provided a projection of the maximum number of persons that thc GMP would allow for the County and in particular, the portion east of CR951. From the population projections, the Study attempted to allocate cost associated with the projected infrastructure and services outlay to serve that population, based upon existing levels of service. Those infrastructure providers included: Transportation, Public Utilities, Parks, Schools, Stormwater Management, Libraries, Emergency Medical Services, the Fire Districts and the County's Chapter 189 Districts. The jirst phase, Preliminary Report was a twenty-four (24) month long assessment that developed three levels of potential infrastructure and service provision scenarios from the various infrastructure and service providing divisions/departments throughout the County to satisfy the projected population. The Preliminary Report was presented to the BCC at a May 24, 2006 workshop. At the May 24, 2006 workshop, the BCC after hearing the presentation of the Preliminary Report and the three levels of potential infrastructure and service outlay, directed for the second phase of the Study to gain insight from the property owners of the Study. Moreover, the intention of the planning effort was to better understand how the property owners in the area East of County Road 951 viewed the potential growth within the study area, and how those residents felt that grow1h could best affect the levels of service for governmental infrastructure and service providers. To direct the second phase of the Study, the BCC created the Horizon Study Public Participation Master Committee. The East of CR95l Horizon Study Public Participation process, steered by the Public Participation Master Committee was a 23 month long process of public prcsentations designed to inform the general public of the specifics of the provisions of the various infrastructure and service providers, while professionally polling and soliciting input from thc residents of the Study area in relation to their perspectives related to those idcntified potential grow1h outlays and the cost identijied within the first Phase. As part of the public participation process, the Master Committee held two successive meetings to discuss the issue of Transportation planning. Like all components of the Preliminary Study, the Transportation component provided a working meeting to the Committee, which was held in !mmokalee, and a public participation meeting. These meetings were held in December 2007, and January 2008. It was during these interactions between the Master Committee and the Transportation Department that the nced for a Bridge Study materialized. As part of the discussions with the Transportation planning staff, the concept of increasing the mobility within the Golden Gate Estates through a series of strategically placed bridges resurfaced. During the 2003 update of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the concept of bridging strategic locations within the Subdistrict was promoted. These direct conversations between the Master Committee and Transportation initiated the Golden Gatc Estates Bridge Study, which was designed to identify the prioritized locations for bridges which would provide the greatest benefit to overall system capacity. This specific effort will greatly enhance the county's cffort in response to Housc Bill 697 and will contribute to reductions in overall vehicle miles traveled (VMT), as well as green house gas (GHG) emission reductions. Vll In addition to the Bridge Study, the public participation portion of Phase II was comprised of the development of the Collier County Interactive Growth Model (CIGM). At the inception of the East of CR95 I Study, the BCC issued a policy directive that the study would not include a land use componcnt. The intent behind the directive was that future land use changes should not be the impetus behind analyzing infrastructure needs in the area east of CR951. Although this intent was fundamentally sound in concept. generally accepted planning practices and principles recognize the need to link land use planning with transportation planning and other infrastructure needs. Based upon this recognition, at the May 24, 2006 hearing of the Preliminary Report, the BCC directed staff to enter into a contract with Van Buskirk, RyfTel and Associates to initiate the development of a land use modeling tool, the Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM). The CIGM was designed to spatially allocate projected population to assist with the timing and loeational decisions related to infrastructure and service provisions. On January 13, 2009, the BCC officially adopted the ClGM as an additional planning tool. The resulting byproduct of the Horizon Study was/is: I. An approved framework of position points established through the public process in regard to level of service preferences regarding the infrastructure and service provisions for the County's eastern rural area. These Position Points are expected to be utilized as a factor for consideration by the BCC as they are evaluating land use decisions and policies within the Study area. 2. The developed Collier County Inter-Active Gro"'1h Model (CIGM), which will assist m determination of effieientloeational decisions for infrastructure and service locations. It should also be noted that the CIGM has been utilized by Comprehensive Planning as an additional too] to evaluate market demand for amendments to the GMP. The CIGM has and is being utilized by the County to evaluate the appropriate land use mix for the Eastern portion of the County as ne", Towns and Villages are proposed within the Rural Fringe District and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlays and identify inelticiencies!deficiencies within the proposed land use allocation for the Eastern portion of the County. 3. The Horizon Study Oversight Committee. created by The BCC at their January 13.2009 Public Hearing to ensure stafT "'as maintaining and utilizing the ClGM in the most elticient and effective manner. 4. The Golden Gate Bridge Study was approved by the BCC at their January 13. 2009 Public Hearing and as funds become available the Bridge Study will establish the prioritization of locations for system improvements. The improvements or new bridge locations are designed to provide for a reduction in overall trip lengths ",ithin the Golden Gate Estates. A tinal long range planning effort was initiated in collaboration with the Horizon Study and the RLSA 5'year Review Committee work, the Master Mobility Plan. That effort is currently on-going and will be described at the clatter portion of the Introduction. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay 5- Year Review Committee Collier County adopted the RLSA Overlay in the Land Development Code (LDC) as Section 4.08.00 on January 30, 2004 as the implementing regulation for the Gro"'1h Management Plan amendments V111 known broadly as the "Rural/Eastern Lands Amendments" which were developed in response to Administration Commission Final Order No. AC99-002, which required a "Rural and Agricultural Assessment" and subsequent adoption of the Growth Management Plan amendment based upon that assessment. The BCC established the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Review Committee per Policy 1.22 of the RLSA Overlay, which required a Five-Year Review of the RLSA. Accordingly, the BCC established the ad hoc Rural Lands Stewardship Area Review Committee (Committee) by Resolution Number 2007,305A on October 24, 2007, and provided the Committee with the following functions, powers and duties: 1. "Review data concerning the participation and effectiveness in the Overlay meeting the Goal, Objective, and Policies in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. 2. Review the RLSA Overlay and make recommendations to increase the effectiveness of the Overlay. 3. Assist in determining the most efTective venues and dates to hold public presentations; and 4. Assist in promoting public interest in the review process." On May 27, 2008, the BCC approved the "Phase I-Technical Report" (#1 of functions, powers, and duties of the Committee). The "Phase I-Technical Report" was a review of data concerning the participation and effectiveness in the Overlay meeting the Goal, Objective, and Policies in the Future Land Use Element of the GMP which is required by Policy 1.22 of the RLSA Overlay. The "Phase 1- Technical Report" was presented and responded to by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) prior to presentation to the BCC. On May 27, 2008, the "Phase I-Technical Report" of the Committee was brought before the BCC, accepted by the BCC, and forwarded to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for its records in accordance with the directive contained in Policy 1.22 of the RLSA. While Phase I was the technical report on the programs accomplishments to date, the Committee also generated a Phase II report which provided an assessment of the policies of the RLSA and potential amendments to those policies to increase their efTectiveness. The Phase II report was generated over the course of twenty public meetings between March 4, 2008 and Decembcr 18,2008. The BCC on December 2, 2008 provided direction to staff to facilitate the review of the Committee's Phase II rcport before both the CCPC and the EAC. Accordingly, a combined total of eleven (II) public meetings were held (6 CCPC public meetings and 5 EAC public meetings) between January 28 and March 10, 2009 of which a total of 8 were public hearing dates before the CCPC (January 28 & 30, February 5, 20, & 26) and the EAC (January 29, Fcbruary 5 & 27). During these public hearings the public was encouraged to speak concerning the Report. All meetings of the CCPC and EAC were properly noticed public meetings. recorded with minutes taken. and most meetings wcre telcvised. On January 6. 2009 the Committee issued its original 2-volume "Five-Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Program" Rcport which includes the following: a. Volume 1 of the Report contains the approved "Phase 1- Technical Report" (to the BCC on May 27, 2008), as well as the "Phase II-RLSA Overlay" review and recommendations; and IX b. Volume 2 of the Report contains the major appendices and support documentation which the Committee considered when forming and finalizing its recommendations to the BCC. Prior to its issuance of the original January. 2009 Final Report. the Committee held a series of public meetings between November. 2007 and January 6. 2009 and received and reviewed information provided by experts. heard from representatives of several organizations and individuals and summary minutes and taped recorded documents were developed and maintained for public record. Most of the Committee meetings were held in the Community Development and Environmental Services building. while several of the meetings were held at both the new Town of Ave Maria and at the North Collier Regional Park. These meetings led to the preparation of the Phase I and Phase II Reports. Most meetings were well attended with audience attendance/participation usually ranging between 15 and 30 persons. All persons were given an opportunity to speak and/or present information. There arc no time specific requirement in the (iMP RLSA Goal. Objective and Policies that any amendments to the RLSA Overlay be made. but the Committee did arrive upon a list of modifications to the program based upon the Original Report. It should be noted that the proposed amendments to the RLSA Overlay were/are Committee,driven. At the time proposed amendments to the RLSA Overlay of the GMP have not becn substantively reviewed hy Staff for sufficiency. completeness. supporting data and analysis. proper "wordsmithing", and consistency with the GMP. Florida Statutes. and Florida Administrative Code. Moreovcr. the Committee was aware that not all of the data and analysis to support the amendments has been completed. The extensive two year review of the RLSA Overlay has formed the hasis of the EAR rcvicw and analysis of the Overlay. which is specified as major issue #7 within the letter of understanding between the County and DCA. Adoption of the Ten-Year Water Supply Plan In anticipation of the rapid population growth and increasing water demands facing thc State, and the potential threats to both the economy and natural resources, the Lcgislature amended the Florida Water Resources Act (Chapter 373, F.S.) in 1997. The amcndmcnt required the five water management districts to initiate regional water supply planning in all areas of the State where reasonable anticipated sources of water were deemed inadequate to mect year 2020 projected demands. The purpose of water supply planning is to develop strategies to mect future water demands of urban and agricultural uses, while meeting the needs of the environment. This process identifies areas where historically used sources of water will not he adequate to mect futurc dcmands. and evaluates several water source options to meet the shortfall. As mandated hy Florida water law. each regional water supply plan is based on at least a 20-year future planning horizon. and a complete update of each plan is required every five years. The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has developed a long-term comprehensive regional water supply plan update for its planning area. Collier County is within the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Previous water supply plans jilr the Lower West Coast were completed in February 1994 (planning horizon 20 I 0) and April 2000 (planning horizon 2(20), which the County utilized to develop its 2002 Water Master Plan llpdate. The most recent water supply plan update is the 2005, 2006 Lower West Coast Plan Update that has a planning horizon of2025. In 2002 the Legislature expanded the local government comprehensive plan requirements. known as Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. to strengthen coordination of water supply planning and local land usc planning. One of the most significant requirements was a Ten,Ycar Watcr Supply Facilities Work x Plan in order to project the local government's needs for at least a 10-year period, identify and prioritize the water supply facilities and sources of water that will be needed to meet those needs, and include in the local government's Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements the capital improvements identified as needed for the first five years. To date, the County's Water Master Plan has been considered the County's official plan for water capital improvements and the basis for the 5-year Capital Improvement Schedule contained in the Capital Improvement Element. Lower West Coast Planning Area Map ! , >---.~ ....,r, . .,l ~"" .~ r--. ,...n..."..,..v.........."..__~.......'f........... .-.... ,:"... "..,.....;....,-..""'.- ,~_";"_"""'4>-.-t:.....--. "'...,..,..".........u......,..._..."..,.._" On February 25, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners adopted an update to the County's 2001 Water Master Plan. to provide an integrated approach for meeting the projected water system demands up to the year 2022. The "2002 Water Master Plan Update" provided for comprehensive overview of the entire water system. including emergency systems. water demand projections and demands and proposed conservation and reclaimed water projects, and provided a plan for future water supply and intrastructure needs to meet the requirements of growth, infrastructure renewal. replacement and enhancement over a course of Jlvc years. This plan utilized population projections prepared by the Colljcr County Comprehensive Planning Department that were approved at that time by the Florida Department (11' Community Anairs (DCA) and accepted by the SFWMD. Water demands were provided at live-year increments to be consistent with the 2000 Lower West Coast Regional Water Xl Supply Plan. The 2002 Water Master Plan Update formed the foundation for the proposed County's Ten, Year Water Supplies Facilities Work Plan. During the State of Florida's 2005 legislative session, la'Wmakers revised state water law to include a new statutory provision. Local governments within the Lower West Coast Planning Area are required to prepare a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that identifies water supply projects, and adopt revisions to comprehensive plans within 18 months following the approval of the 2005-2006 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update. On January 25, 2007, as part of the 2004 EAR-based amendments, and in preparation of the anticipated Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, Collier County adopted language to coordinate water supply planning with SFWMD. Modilications of various Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs), as required by these legislative actions, wcre addressed through the GMP amendment to the Potable Water Sub-Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. The amendments referenced the 2002 Water Master Plan Update and any subsequent updates as the appropriate document for the County's water supply planning. On February 24, 2009, the County adopted the Ten- Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The plan, and any subsequent updates, is the County's appropriate document for water supply planning. FloodplainfWatershed Management Plans Beginning in 2004, Collier County developed its initial Floodplain Management Plan (FMP) as a part of its participation in the National Flood Insurance Program's Community Rating System (CRS). The FMP was incorporated into the County's overall Hazard Mitigation Plan. In 2006, Collier County established a Floodplain Management Planning Committee (FMPC) under the dircction of the County Manager. The purpose of thc FMPC was to provide input into updates to the 1'1'.11' and annually review the FMP Action Plan for completion of thc action items. Immediately upon the establishment of the FMPC, the County initiated a rewrite of the 1'1'.11' to better address the requirements identified by FEMA in the CRS Coordinator's Manual. That rewrite was completed by late 2007 and the new FMP was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in Deccmber 2007. The FMPC typically meets once a month. Throughout the year the FMPC rcviews progress being made on the FM1' action plan items, discusses desired floodplain management program ideas, and has been working on development and approval of a new Flood Damage Prevcntion Ordinancc to comply with current Federal Emergency Managemcnt Agency (FEM;\) requircmcnts. In addition to floodplain management as directed through the National Flood Insurance Program, the County has also committed to development of watershed managemcnt plans to addrcss water resource issues (rainfall, runof1~ llooding, watcr use, water quality, natural system needs, impacts of new development. correcting existing problems, etc.). That work startcd in 2007 with the establishment of a dedicated budget for development of the watershed management plans. ^ consultant was hired to assist stan in laying out a framework of activities that needed to be accomplished, and the interlinking of these activities as subsequent consultants were hired to accomplish the work by the end of 2010. Initial work began with contracting for a unitied aerial topographic mapping of the County (this did not include the vast area of the Big Cypress National Preserve east of SR,29 which is all federal land and not subject to change from development intercsts) using I.ight Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Coupled with that was the developmcnt of a detailed computer model of the vast network of publicly operated drainage facilities. This modeling was coordinated with the South Florida Water Management District by using their existing model as the starting model and providing more detail, Xll coupled with the new LiDAR topography, and updated land use. The County hired a consultant firm to accomplish this work, and they are currently working on the modeling. The result will be an analysis of the existing conditions, and development of alternatives to address the identified problems as well as look toward the impacts of future development potential to ensure that additional problems are not created. The process of developing the watershed management plans includes extensive coordination with other local and state agencies along with the public through periodic public meetings. Energy Audit and Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report & Rebuilding Collier's Energy Use Task Force The report presented the results of an energy use/greenhouse gas inventory for Collier County, for calendar year 2007, an accounting of both energy use and the amounts and sources of emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) for the community as a whole, encompassing the area within the County limits, with a detailed look at Collier County government operations. Results are presented in terms of standard GHG units, but their magnitudes directly reflect the relative importance of differing forms of energy use in the County. The purpose of the inventory was to better understand the ways the County utilized energy so that effective policies and programs could be implemented to reduce costs and environmental impact. Additionally, the inventory provides a baseline against which future energy use and emissions reductions can be measured. The project was funded by Collier County Audubon Society, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida and National Audubon's TogetherGreen grant program and utilized the software and protocol provided by ICLEI, the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. The three primary motivations for the Energy Audit Report were: I) Understanding patterns of energy use can lead to saving residents/taxpayers money. 2) It is widely accepted that fossil fuel energy use contributes to global climate change, the extent of which will be critical for low lying regions like Collier County. Assessing and reducing emissions demonstrates responsibility to present and future residents. 3) Increasing numbers of state and federal programs (and grant opportunities) require municipalities to address climate change. By following the established ICLEI protocol. Collier County joins twenty four communities in Florida and hundreds nationwide willing to take action and thus demonstrate responsibility and accountability. The report provided specific recommendation recommendations and next steps for County as follows: I) Establish the following reduction targets: 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050. 2) Collate a summary of the baseline inventory, all energy savings related projects, together with additional programs (including but not limited to those described below) into a comprehensive Collier County Climate Action Plan. Identify within the plan how GHG reduction measures tie into other County and regional efforts (such as the Master Mobility Plan, Coastal Management Plans and Land Development Codes). Include an assessment of the impacts of climate change and energy management in existing plans and codes to ensure the County anticipates and budgets properly for all potential changes in Collier County through at least the next forty years. 3) Pursue the LFGTE project along with other waste management projects. Xlll 4) Continue government based work: i) building energy retrofits, ii) street lighting replacements to high efficiency bulbs, iii) alternative fuel vehicles. and iv) promote the commuter services program. 5) Continue the community focused transportation programs such as traffic signal optimization, 6) Establish new community oriented programs to include: i) a community focused "Be Green when Grccn makes Cents" program, or cquivalent and ii) a Green Business Program. (Additional programs could be described within in the planned Master Mobility Plan and potentially be funded through additional grant monies or other sources). 7) Carry out an energy use/greenhouse gas emissions re-inventory in 3-5 years to measure progress. The Energy Audit was presented to and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners in November of 2009. While the Board did not provide wholesale acceptance of all of the recommendations contained in the report, the Board did. based upon the acceptance of the Report, create the Rebuilding Collier's Energy Use Task Force. The purpose of the Task Force is to explore the recommendations contained within the Report and bring suggestions back to thc Board on the means to accomplishing the energy efficiencies contained in the Report. The work of the Task Force is on-going at the time of authoring this report. In June of2010, the Task Force began discussions with the Board regarding the development of a program to green up energy use at homes and businesscs throughout the County. Thc program the Task Force envisions would take advantage of legislation called Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE), signed by Gov, Crist in May 2010. PACE sets out a llnancing mechanism !l)r local governments to create a pool of money homeowners and businesses can tap fl)r projccts from electric car chargers to energy emcient windows. Other possible uses j()r the money include insulation upgrades, solar panels, wind turbines and energy efTicient air conditioning. The full specifics and applicability of the program were still in the development stage by the Task Force at the time of authoring this report, but the PACE program and other similar efTorts to increase energy emcieney within the County arc expected based on the Task Force's work within the Energy Audit. The future recommendations of the Task Force, once approved by the Board are expected to intertwine with the regulatory environment of the County. In a related effort, it should be noted that each of the Objectives and Policies contained in the GMP Elements have been reviewed in relationship to House Bill 697 and the proponents of energy et1ieiency. A copy of the Sccond Dran Rules IlX lIB697 has been provided as supporting documentation for the EAR workbook. Master Mobility Plan The purpose of the Master Mobility Plan (MMP) is to guide the need and location of land use, public services (libraries, EMS, schools, etc), multi,modal transportation and various infrastructures while protecting environmentally sensitive land, habitat and agricultural land with the primary objective of reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), as the County progresses to build-out. The Board of County Commissioners on July 28, 2009, provided approval to staff to seek a grant under the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program, which were funds made available for the first time under the American Rccovcry and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The County received the EECBG grant on September 8th and the BCC appnl\ed the grant on September 29th. XIV The MMP is intended to be a concise and practical plan that will manage growth in a sustainable, financially feasible and environmentally responsible manner. It is anticipated that the plan will be developed within a 24 month time frame. In addition, implementation of certain sub elements of the plan such as local street network connectivity, signal timing and other projects that reduce greenhouse gases and VMT will be initiated during the development of the MMP. This plan will inherently allow for flexibility through the development and integration of Gro\\1h Management Plan goals, objectives and policies as well as Land Development Code criteria that will help accomplish the following: 1. Provide needed infrastructure and reduce redundancies by the establishment and incorporation of an Infrastructure Master Plan with the goal of reducing the VMT. 2. Strategically locate public services as well as private residential, commercial and industrial development by the establishment and incorporation of a Land Use Master Plan with the goal of reducing the VMT. 3. Incorporate multi-modal transportation alternatives by the establishment and implementation ofa Mobility Master Plan with the goal of reducing the VMT. 4. Preserve environmentally sensitive land, habitat and agricultural land by the establishment and incorporation of a Wildlife Crossings and Habitat Preservation Master Plan 5. Secure MOU's (Memorandum of Understanding) that define, validate and document the commitments and expectations of Collier County Government and the primary stakeholdcrs and agencies. The development and implementation of the MMP will result in job creation, job retainment, a measurable reduction of fossil fuel consumption and less impact to the environment caused by future growth. The MMP will help guide Collier County through its next phase of gro\\1h efficiently and effectively. The investment in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure will providc long,term economic and environmental benefits. Mobility invcstments and subsidies are justified in that they will promote financial feasibility by: I. Increasing and improving cost-effectivc, environmentally responsible mobility options. 2. Result in more cost effective transportation facility and servicc investments. 3. Increase transport system efficiency (reduces total costs or increase total benefits). 4. Reducing resource costs, such as thc amount of fuel consumed per unit of transport, and the amount of land devoted to transport facilities. 5. Significantly reduce VMT. The savings that results when motorist reduce mileage are widely distributed throughout the economy. The Planning Objectives for the plan are: Congcstion Reduction, Parking Costs Savings, Facility Cost Savings, Consumer Cost Savings, Reduced Traffic Accidents, Improved Mobility Options, Energy Conservation. Pollution Reduction, Physical Fitness & Health, Land Use Objectives and Community Livability The MMP project scope is detailed below: I. Build databases and GIS maps of existing and proposed stakeholder plans (utility, parks, fire, protection overlays, etc.). 2. Prepare Infrastructure Master Plan xv 3. Prepare Land Use Master Plan 4. Prepare Mobility Master Plan 5. Prepare Wildlife Crossings and Habitat Preservation Master Plan 6. Secures MOU's 7. Incorporate recommendations/changes resulting from public workshops into Draft Vision Plan Map. 8. Conduct evaluation of effects of vision plan/land use scenario (placement of public services) on transportation plan. 9. Document results of evaluation stating benefits and disadvantages. 10. Prepare Draft Vision Plan Report. 11. Submit Draft Vision Plan Report to Collier County for review. 12.Incorporatc County staff revisions and recommendations into Final Draft Vision Plan Report. 13. Provide support to County staff for presentations to CCPC and BOCC. 14. GMP Recommendations 15. Final Map Set 16. MOU's signed By the time of this transmittal of the EAR in January 2011. the MMP will be 14 months into development and the conclusion of the planning effort is fully expected to result in a number of amendments to the GMP and the Land Development Code dircctly related to the reduction of vehicle miles traveled and the corresponding green house gas rcductions. Conclusion Each of these eflorts have been highlighted near the beginning of the EAR document to demonstrate the County's efforts and undertakings to gain increased efficiency within the co,ordination of future private development. public expenditures. environmcntal protcctions and diverse broad based land use allocations. A number of the lcssons learned Irom thesc past and on-going etTorts have influenced and shaped this EAR report and have identified areas where the GMP could be amended to better accomplish the goals. objects and polices contained within. The premise of everyone of the County's efforts addressed within this section have been motivated by the same base motivation as the EAR process. to ensure that the regulator environment provided /()r within the Collier Grow1h Management Plan. is one that provides the County's citizens. businesses and natural systems the greatest chance at long terIll sustainability. XVI Chapter One Public Pa rtici pation Chapter One - Public Participation Engaging the public in the evaluation and appraisal of the Comprehensive Plan is challenging. While County staff undertook several specific exercises to obtain input and feedback from stakeholders, public outreach and involvement is really a full-time, year-round activity, requiring the planner to continually be listening in all forums and settings, not just those devised for the EAR. Described below are the specific events used to gain input and insight into the long term desires of the County's citizens, business community, educators, regulatory agencies, etc. In addition to these activities which were specific to the EAR, several other methods of obtaining input into the evaluation and long range planning process were described within the introduction section of the EAR. EAR Kick-off Meeting at the Southwest Regional Planning Council On August 26, 2009, County staff attended a workshop, at the offices of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, in North Fort Myers to meet with DCA representatives and representatives from other state and regional agencies to discuss the EAR process, learn of issues considered important by the DCA staff, and to learn how neighboring local governments intended to respond to issues identified by the State. Inter-Governmental Kick-off Meeting On September 8, 2009, Comprehensive Planning hosted an EAR intergovernmental meeting. The meeting offered an opportunity to fellow staff from local City agencies to identifY and discuss areas of concern with respect to intergovernmental items or issues common to fellow governments. In addition, this meeting provided an opportunity to discuss sharing data, to discuss new data that must be generated, and the analysis necessary to address those issues identified as outdated, problematic, or where compliance has not occurred or is no longer practical. Meetings with County Departments Early on in the EAR development process, planning staff met individually with most of the County Departments. For the entire "life" of the County's Comprehensive Plan, most of the County Departments have been actively involved in the front end of the planning process, including in the development of policies, as well as in implementing the actions, programs and projects that fallout of the Plan. It is the ongoing involvement at all levels of County operations in the comprehensive planning process that have resulted in a Plan that is meaningful and realistic, and can be effectively implemented. Although a formal meeting was arranged with each Department early in EAR development, in actuality, the coordination and collaboration is constant and ongoing. In many cases, Departments have recommended specific amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Co-ordination with Other Agencies Staff interacted with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) concerning their expectations for the County's EAR. Overall, SWFWMD's big areas of concern for Collier County fell 1 Public Participation January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing under the heading of Water Resource Protection and Climate Change. For Water Resource Protection, the subject areas highlighted by the District were: flood protection and water quality, vulnerability of potable water supply to contamination and demand rate for water supply projects. Under the heading of Climate Change, strategies to protect water supplies and potential saltwater intrusion were highlighted. For the assessment of the Economic Element of the OMP staff co-ordinated the review efforts with the Collier County Economic Development Council. not-for-profit organization whose mission is to diversify the economy and create high wage jobs County and Departmental Website The EAR webpage described the purpose and value of the Comprehensive Plan and went over the EAR process, summarized meetings and events related to the EAR. and importantly. provided a location for people to track the list of issues as it developed throughout the public participation process, and the review schedule and results of the advisory board EAR workshops held in the summer 01'2010. EAR Public Meetings Throughout the spring of 2010, planning statl conducted 3 workshops around the County. The locations of the public meetings were distributed to the various areas within the County to provide ease of access to a majority of the County's residents. The workshops provided people with the opportunity to hear staff presentations concerning the purpose, scope and schedule of the EAR. ask questions about the Comprehensive Plan and the EAR process. provide comment to what they felt was working and what could be improved within the County, and to meet County staff from several different Departments. While turnout at the workshops was not overwhelming. the input received from the public, as well as municipal staffs attending the workshops, was important and contributed to the development and refinement of issues and opportunities. Below is a listing of the Public Comments received at each of the three public participation meetings. The 1 st EAR Public Participation Meeting held at the North Naples Regional Park on January 25. 2010. The comments received from those in attendance have been grouped associated with the major issues identified by the County and DCA. Following the issue cited will be the corresponding objective or policy within the OMP elements to which it pertains. For the comments received over the course of the three public participation meetings for the EAR. staff did not attempt to generalize and/or categorize the comments. but rather, as mentioned, linked the comment to the appropriate policy and/or objective in one of the OMP elements, where applicable. Each public comment that is linked to a policy or objective will be noted in Chapter Two of the EAR. This approach will allow the reader understand how the public comment relates to staffs analysis of the policy or objective and what, if any modifications, revisions. deletions are being suggested. It should be noted that a number of the comments received are either issues dealing with the programmatic delivery of services provide for by the various dcpartments/divisions of the County or are observations from the individual related to issues outside of the purview of the OMP policies and objectives. These comments have been designated accordingly. The F' EAR Public Participation Meetinf!, was held at the North Collier Regional Park - Administration Building - Room A-6 on January 25. 20]0. below are the comments received 2 Puhlic Participation January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS . Encourage smart growth principles - mixed use, urban infill, walkable commumtIes, alternate transportation modes, and more green space. Objective 7 of the Future Land Use Element. . Encourage "experimental" zoning - cluster housing in single-family zoning, guesthouse permanent occupancy. Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element. . County should create Walk only districts - by design or retroactively (close off streets) - and not limited to commercial areas. Policy 1.1 of the Future Land Use Element. . County should Reserve right-of-way for light rail. Objective 6 of the Future Land Use Element and Objective 4 of the Transportation Element. . Elements of the GMP need allow and encourage parking spaces for compact and micro cars - with parking space credit. Land Development Code . County should be recognizing LEED principles (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System ™ of sustainable green building and development practices and eliminating code barriers to using alternative (green) building materials. Objective 6 of the Economic Element. . County should be recognizing LEED principles (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System ™ of sustainable green building and development practices. Objective 6 of the Economic Element. . Regarding Item No.2 (above) -Change the TDR program to require use of TDR's to obtain additional density (cluster housing, guesthouses). Policy 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element. . Elements of the GMP need to provide more incentive for non-motorized (or Mass Transit) development. Objective 12 of the Transportation Element TRANSPORTATION . County not adhering to Greenway Interconnectivity Policy 4.2 of Transportation Element - the County "shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by constructing improvements identified on the 2030 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit". Policy 4.2 of Transportation Element. . County should be studying ideas for a 5-Year work program for pathways (no current program). Policy 4.5 of the Tramportation Element. . County not adhering to Policy 4.7 of Transportation Element - bike lanes included in resurfacing projects - the County "shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem". Policy 4.7 of Transportation Element . Intergovernmental cooperation involving the County not strong enough to achieve the intended functional sidewalk/path Interconnectivity with school property (pathways). Objective 4 of Transportation Element . County should be studying ideas to allocate existing lanes to public transit, including dedicated transit lanes, restricted SOY lanes, carpool lanes, etc... Objective 12 of Transportation Element. . County not offering adequate access to Mass Transit, including enhanced routes, dedicated mass transit lanes, etCH' Policy 12.10 of Transportation Element . County not doing enough to require mix ofland uses. Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element. EASTERN LANDS (RLSA - RFMUD) 3 Public Participation January lOll Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . Adjustment to Transfer of Development Rights (2005) program not producing desired result. Wholesale comment on Overlay . Application process for severances & transfers not fair to all receiving agencies. Land Development Code . Need more specifics of Land Management Plan required for TOR credit No.3. Cost associated with severance process prohibited. Land Development Code . The County should develop a unified LMP for area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay . County should be studying ideas for TOR's to be applied beyond RFMUO. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use Dislrict Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions . County should be studying ideas to have a TOR education program. Programmatic . TOR's should be open to be used in Urban Area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay,Additional TDR Provisions . Look at Marion County TOR Program. Infiirmational . County should be studying impacts of RLSA potential development and their effect on Estates (i.e. ground water. drainage. long-tenn effects), Policy 3,1 of Future Land Use Eleme11l- Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay . LRTP not showing specifics ofRLSA. 1nfiirmalional . County Government not providing awareness of development schedule of C.R. 951. Informational AFFORDABLE HOUSING . County does not do enough to provide housing opportunities in close proximity to employment centers. Policy 1.4 of/he Housing Element . County does not do enough to encourage or mandate workforce housing component for development. Policy 1.3 of the Housing Element . Waivers for impact fees for affordable housing projects. Policy 2.10 of the Housing Element . County does not sufficiently address low income housing (provide incentives). Policy 2.3 of the Housing Element . County should provide land for affordable housing. Poliq 2.1 () of the Housing Element . County should be studying ideas for multiple units on single-family lots. Future Land Use Designation Description Section Density Rating S:vstem. . County should be studying ideas for lofts above garages. etc. to provide affordable housing opportunities. Future Land Use Designation Description Section - Density Rating System, . Coordinate transportation network with location of affordable housing units. PoliC)' 1. 4 of the Housing Element. CLIMA TE CHANGE . County should be studying ideas to target Green House Gas sources - besides transportation. . County should be studying ideas to address lack of energy efficiency plans. . County should be studying ideas 10 address need to plan for Sea Level Rise. . County should be studying ideas to access & connect Slate Parks with County Network. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION 4 Public Parlicipation January 2/111 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . County should re-evaluate monitoring and maintenance procedures for nutrient loads/pollution/water quality. Objective 1 of the Drainage Sub-Element. . Improve public participation outreach and involvement for watershed management planning. . The County needs better outreach and education with user-friendly terminology and use illustrations. . The County Watershed Management Planning needs to be holistic - more than just water. The 2nd EAR Public Participation Meeting was held at the University of Florida/Collier County Agricultural Extension Offices on February 23, 2010. As providedfor at the first public participation meeting the comments receivedfi"om those in attendance have been grouped associated with the major issues identified by the County and DCA. Following the issue cited will be the corresponding objective or policy within the GMP elements to which it pertains, if applicable. CLIMATE CHANGE . Promote and encourage safe bike/walk, including education to improve safety of bike/pedestrians routes to reduce number of miles driven, especially school drop,off. Policy 4.2 Transportation Element. . Reduce gaps between CAT stops. Explore feasibility of bike rentals at CAT stops to minimize gaps in the existing networks of bike/pedestrians pathways. Programmatic . Increase mass transit availability (CAT). Policy 12.10 Transportation Element . Create bike/pedestrians pathways on canal banks to separate bike routes from vehicle traffic. Programmatic . Do not use Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) reduction as an excuse to build more commercial in neighborhoods where they were not planned nor vetted through a local master plan process. Observational . Flooding as a result of climate change will affect current population estimates, County needs to revise estimates. Observational . Include more bridges (Golden Gate Estates) to reduce fuel consumption and safety. . Policy 9.3 Transportation Element/ GGAMP Restudy . Create County-wide storm water management to address sea level rise. Policy 2.1.5 Conservation and Coastal Management Element . Standards to address Climate Change need to be different for Golden Gate Estates (than urban coastal zones). Observational . Allow low density areas in Golden Gate Estates. Observational . Make CAT cost more affordable. Observational TRANSPORTATION . Public safety in the Estates has been ignored - Observational. . Paving not followed through on local roads - Programmatic 5 Public Participation January 20 II Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . Proposed Transportation Corridors thru Estates never contemplated by Master Plan and IS inconsistent with the GGAMP. Observational · Vanderbilt Beach Road not necessary - inconsistent with GGAMP. Observational . Taking of homes for Vanderbilt Beach Road not necessary. Observational · Extension of Green Blvd and Wilson Blvd - not consistent with GGAMP. GGAMP Restudy . Transportation - Mobility Plan will Change Rural Character. Observational . Bridge the waterways - instead of 4-6 lane roads to reduce miles traveled. Policy 93 Transportation Element/ GGAMP Rcstud\' . Multi paths should be developed separate of roadway. Policy 4.2 o(Transportation Element. . Better linkage between Transportation Planning and Land Use is needed. Objective 5 Transportation Element. . Loop around Estates do not go through it to carry traffic. CiGAMP Restudy . Long Range Transportation Plan needs to be incorporated further into GMP recognize character of sub-districts. Objective 5 Transportation Element. . Transportation feasibility between sub-districts (RLSA. RFMUD. Estates) needs greater coordination. Objective 5 7i'ansportalion Elemcnt. . Interior Commercial Development in Estates not consistent with GGAMP. GGAMP Restudy. . Eighth Street is a residential road - Fair Grounds should stop using for all events. Programmatic. . Estates Road Network needs to be planned for build-out. with street width and locations clearly shown. Programmatic. . More ECO friendly landscaping and water efficient medians. Programmatic. . Widen Oil Well Road to State Road 29 and expand State Road 29. LRTP Programmatic. . Bridging of Wilson Blvd South should never be proposed. Programmatic. . 1-75 interchange should not route traffic thru Estates. LRIP Programmatic. GGAMP Restudy AFFORDABLE HOUSING . Maintain viability of below market rate housing (particularly multi,family units) as transitional housing. Observational. . Increase public assistance to affordable housing, possibly maintaining and administrating units (existing) for present and future occupants. Programmatic. . Stop steering affordable housing into the estates. Partner with realtors to Improve the Image of the estates. Observational. . Maintain unoccupied housing units. Programmatic. . Increase focus of affordable housing to multi-family units from single-family. Programmatic. . Promote owner occupied units/rent,to-own units. Programmatic. . Develop a program to monitor absentee owner activities. Programmatic. . Waive impact fees for development of affordable housing. Policy 2. 7 Housing Element. . Reflect actual vacancy rates within CIGM. Programmatic. . Identify threshold of affordable housing within geographic area - and allow no affordable housing in that location if thresholds crossed. Polic)' 1.4 Housing Element. 6 Public Participation January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . Issue of affordable housing in Golden Gate Estates - Is it a good idea to explore potential? Observational. EASTERN LANDS (RLSA - RFMUD) . Increase developer credits during RLSA revisions. RLSA 5-Year review amendments Observational. . Credits for underground assets? (Mining) RLSA 5,Year review amendments - Observational. . Panther overpasses and underpasses (do they work)? Programmatic. . Define primary and secondary panther habitat. Programmatic. . LOSS for concurrency has not been proven by data and analysis for the new changes proposed to the RLSA Overlay. Observational. . Don't use Golden Gate Estates as thru-way for access to the coast. Observational. . Don't build roads in advance of development and population. Observational. . TDR program is inefficient. Observational. . TDR program doesn't incent transfers sufficiently for developers. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . Envisioned market for TDR's is non-existent (don't sell) Observational. . Further incent transfers into urban infill (clause is unclear and needs to be expanded). Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . Provide further incentives from sending to receiving. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . Rural villages envisioned within receiving areas don't provide sufficient commercial capacity. Observational. . Design and criteria for commercial locations within the villages isolate them from major transportation corridors (making them not viable) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . No new high speed (> 36 mph) roads built in RLSA and Rural Fringe Sending Areas (low speed essential for wildlife preservation) Observational . Commercial development on the interior of Golden Gate Estates goes against the Master Plan and should not be allowed. Observational. . The taking of homes instead of a golf course for the Vanderbilt Beach Extension should not be allowed. Programmatic. . Proposed RLSA amendments in Collier County did not address any concerns from DCA (7 written concerns from Tom Pelham). Observational. . RLSA and RFMUD need to be compatible with Golden Gate Master Plan. Observational. . When RFMUD was created, land use restrictions eliminated functionality of Golden Gate Master Plan - Ex: Proposed location for estates commercial. Observational. . RLSA has encouraged premature conversion of agriculture by: Only low quality agriculture has been protected By using eminent domain to provide transportation corridors Refusing to address DCA concerns Using Section 189 Districts to bypass Florida's Growth Management Laws Observational. 7 Public Participation January 20ll Bee f.'AR Adoption Hearing . GMP Elements (like RLSA RFMUD, and Golden Gate Master Plan) need to address the effects they have on each other: Services, Transportation, Land Use. Observational. . Where is the Master Watershed Management Plan'? Polic}' 2.1.5 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. . Receiving Areas in the RFMUD need to be changed to allow services including business, commercial and industrial can be located there to support not only the RFMUD, but adjacent Golden Gate Estates and surrounding Communities. Observational DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS . Fairground activities have escalated over time - both the fi-equency and intensity of events disrupt the tranquility of surrounding Golden Gate Estates. Observational. . Need Rural Standards for East of C.R. 951 (development standards. roads, dark skies, etc.) Policy 1.5 Capital Improvement.I' Element. . In Golden Gate Estates. commercial development was [mostly] to occur on periphery, and [interior] commercial was to be small scale/small magnitude. Peripheral commercial can be larger in magnitude - that is acceptable. Observational - GGAMP Restudy. . There should be a minimum residency period requirement to serve on Committee(s) that can change, or influence change to. the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), e.g. 5 years. ProKrammatic. . For development in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA), Golden Gate Estates residents are not included/engaged - their input is not sought though RLSA development may impact GGE. Observational. . Proposed large commercial development at Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd. is out of character, destroys aesthetics [referring to proposed GMP amendment petition CP-2008-1]. Observational. . Staff involved in projects. plans, etc. need to have familiarity with the affected area. StafY should live in the area or at least tour the area to get familiar with. and better understand. the area. Observational . More comprehensive approach needed when planning east of 951: GGE. RLSA, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) planning affects one another (drainage, roads, resources, commercial and industrial services). Objective 4 Future Land Use Element . Need to plan for Golden Gate Estates long-term - consider build-out. Observational. . Road corridors serving urban areas should be routed around rural areas so as to maintain community character. Observational, GGAMP Restudy. . Plans for east of 951 aren't flexible enough to accommodate change in growth rate. Observational. . The Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) is slow to react to demographic changes. Observational. . Need a Community Center within Golden Gate Estates. Observational. 8 Public Participation January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . Need larger, more effective buffers around commercial development and County projects when near/affecting nearby residences. Programmatic. . Goals, Objectives and Policies (GaP's) of the GMP are not adequately implemented. Observational. . Need more public arenas for homeowners to voice concerns and opinions about topics/problems affecting them, e.g. fairgrounds activities, water treatment plants, mining operations. Programmatic. . For Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, should take golf course land [for needed right-of-way], not homes. Observational. . During moratorium period (reference June 22, 1999 Final Order from Florida Administration Commission), the County did not adequately address environmental issues, nor where/when/if additional development would be permitted, including agriculture. Observational. . Changes to the GGAMP should be the exception, not the norm. Observational. . One or more East of 951 Horizon Committee Members suggested urbanizing Golden Gate Estates. Need to preserve the rural character, per the GGAMP. Observational. . Should focus on SR 29/82 bypass as an industrial development center based in Immokalee Area. Observational. . Question whether RLSA development showing fiscal neutrality. Policy 4.8 RLSA Overlay - FLUE. . County policies encourage premature conversion of agriculture lands - when there's no need for more residential lands. Observational. . Planning period for GMP should be extended beyond 10 years. Policy 5.4 CIE. . Provide concurrency with Transportation projects/plans. Policy 2.1 Transportation Element. . Need a re-study of GGAMP - need to program for it and provide funding. Observational. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION . With a future unpredictable climate we cannot depend on previous historical levels of water. Observational. . Develop new tools to predict future water availability. Policy 1.3 of Potable Water Sub-Element. . GMP elements need to consider the effects they have on each other and; Available water supply Waste Management (Landfills) Drainage Observational. . If and when sea levels rise, what has the BCB done to keep water in the Eastern Collier area fresh and apart from encroaching seas? Observational - Major Issue, Climate Change. . The County has let the residents down by acquiescing in the FIRM. Observational. . The County has failed to provide guidance to the people who will need a LaMA. Programmatic. . The County has failed to limit growth based on available resources. Objective 2 (Financial Feasibility) Capital Improvement Element. 9 Public Participation January 2011 Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . The County has failed to consider the cumulative effect of deep aquifer withdrawal. Observational. . The County has failed to develop a County-wide Storm Water Plan. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. . Canals not cleaned (algae and weeds cover canal along Frangipani Ave.) Algae sheet sunk (causing future problems for tish and drainage). Programmatic. . C 1 connector has better flow due to culverts being installed. Observational. . FEMA elevations too large a burden during severe recession. Observational. . Need more efficient water management of rural areas east of CR951 to prevent flooding and being rezoned to flood area. Observational. . The new Flood Insurance is unacceptable. Observational. . The County should protest FIRM. Observational. . If flooding is a problem, don't allow additional buildings and asphalt (which can impact their neighbors), Observational . Ditches and swales are not being cleaned and cleared: and driveways do not have proper culverts. Programmatic. . Standing water only 3 times ('95, '06 and '08) the same time the county took readings. Observational. . County Government has failed to implement the Watershed Management Plan into which all other Construction and Coastal Elements, Goals and Objectives were to be involved. Observational - Objective 2.1 ('onservation and Coastal Management Element. . Disappointed with County's failure to put the '89 GMOP LDC into place in a timely manner. Observational. . County has failed to address sustainability and quality of lite for all resources. Observational. . The '89 GMP required that all aspects will be evaluated, watershed by watershed, where is that guidance~ Observational - Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. . All development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated after each watershed and its characteristics were developed. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. . Failed to put into place a Watershed Management Plan, Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. . Dropping water table in GG Estates, GG Estates water resources are being used by City and other areas without benefit to GG Estates. Observational. . Re-use water - can it be turned into a drinking water source? Potential waste of re-use water is a concern (If there is no demand, why pay for treatment?) Policy 1.1 Potable Water Sub-Element. The 3,d EAR Public Participation Meeting was held at the Collier County Board of County Commissioners BCC Chambers. 3rd Floor Administration Building on March 15. 2010. As provided fiJr at the first two puhlic participation meetings the comments receivedfrom those in attendance have been grouped associated with the major issues identified by the County and DCA. Following the issue 10 Puhlic Participation January lOll Bee EAR Adoption Hearing cited will be the corresponding objective or policy within the GMP elements to which it pertains. if applicable. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION . Need consolidation of fire districts. Programmatic Better coordination between School Board (sitting) and County Government (locate schools where infrastructure is available or planned). Same for EMS and Fire Stations - all facets of infrastructure. Policy 2.6 Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) FEMA (under DHS), SFWMD, DEP, USACOE, Collier County Stormwater - need to coordinate water resource management (surface and storm; water supply for municipal resources). Policy 1.4 Potable Water Sub-Element Better coordination between MPO and Comprehensive Planning (Land Use and Transportation). Programmatic Better coordination between Parks & Recreation; and Libraries (co-locate). Policy 1.6.1 Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE) Better coordination between Schools and Parks & Recreation (co-locate). Policy 1.1.2 ROSE Need Rural Development Standards for non-urban areas. Policy 4.1 Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Establish single authority for fire plan reviews. Programmatic . . . . . . . TRANSPORTATION . Integrate MPO and LRTP. Programmatic Transportation Planning should be part of Master Plan. Observational Education enforcement of laws and rules - 3' clear to bikes/pedestrians. Programmatic Establish a minimum Level of Service for multi-model needs. Policy 1.5 Capital Improvements Element & 12.8 Transportation Element Develop bike share with transit. Observational Formalize lime rock road policy. Observational Strengthen 4.6 and 4.7. Policy 4.6 & 4.7. Tran.\portation Element Stress interconnection and continuity. Policy 7.3 FLUE Adopt Rural Road Section Standards - Lighting, Landscape and Water. Policy 1.5 Capital Improvements Element & 12. 8 Transportation Element Fair and equitable impact fees - Too high today/unfriendly/too busy and most cost effective design and construction to reduce fees. Observational Dead ends, (i.e. Vanderbilt Beach Road ends at DeSoto); build when population supports. Policy 1.2 CIE MSTU should pay for own Administration Costs - 10%? Observational Integrate road water management with land use and water quality parks. Programmatic Pathways added to requirement for concurrency. Policy 5.1 CIE Policy 5.1 - add pathways. Policy 5.1 Transportation Element Add linear greenway parks to connect facilities. Programmatic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Public Participation January 20ll Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . Better facility and location planning for schools with coordination of county infrastructure. Objective 3 Public Schools Facility Element . As appropriate, add complete street/non-motorized. Observational . Strategic Park and Ride Transit and Economic Analysis. Programmatic . Red light enforcement may be contrary to tourism. Ohservational . Educate public on Level of Service. Observational CLIMATE CHANGE . Increase Mass Transit instead of road widening. Policy 3.3 li'ansportation Element . Increase bike lanes. Policy 4.5 Tramportation Element . Need to address sea level rise due to climate change. Observational WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION . County has no Flood Plain Management Plan. Policy 63 Drainage Sub-Element . No coordination with Big Cypress Flasin; SFWMD; FEMA and DEI' (ex: - Picayune Strand Restoration project was completed without consideration of the effect of the RLSA on the flood plain). Observational . Where are the Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan and the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan') Poliq 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element . When are the efforts going to be: Funded Delivered Scheduled . Where is monitoring and maintenance of water resource') Potable Water and Drainage Sub- Elements . Watershed/Water Resource Management needs to be holistic . Environment/Deve I opment/Conservat i on! Recharge/Recycl e/Reuse/ Alternati ve Water Resources Observational . The County needs to establish a Stormwater Utility tee to address needed improvements and to address EPA's implementation of the NNC (Numeric Nutrient Criteria). Observational & Policy 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element EASTERN LANDS (RLSA-RFMUDl . TDR Program not working. Observational . Natural Resource Studies not detailed enough. Observational . Not enough TDR's to use for density in Receiving Lands. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD . Allow other uses on Receiving Lands (Non-residential). Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD 12 Puhlic Participation January 20ll Bee EAR Adoption Hearing . RFMUO Plan not compatible with Estates Master Plan. Lost commercial opportunities for the Estates due to RFMUO Plan. Observational . Consider modifying Rural Village Oesign Standards (Street Layout). Programmatic . Consider convertibility of RLSA Oensity to RFMUD (SSA's to Receiving Lands). Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RLSA & RFMUD . Consider "Banking" ofTDR's for smaller parcels. Programmatic . Allow conversion of some Receiving Lands to Sending. Future Land Use Element (FLUE)RFMUD . Engage Estates residents with eastern lands development. Programmatic . Allow owners of Receiving Lands to convert a portion of those lands to Sending Lands in order to get more TORs to use on their remaining Receiving Lands. This process should be available through a rezoning-like process rather than requiring a comprehensive plan anlendment. . Increase the TOR Credits formula for Base TDRs to more than the current one (1) base TOR per five (5) acres. In designated Receiving Areas allow a density of greater than one unit per acre with the use of TDRs and not limit density above one unit per acre to only Rural Villages. Non-villages should be able to go up to 2 units per acre. Like the RLSA, rural villages should be able to go to 4 units per acre, . Remove/modify the very detailed and unworkable requirements for development of a Rural Village. Increase the TDR Bonus multiplier in a Rural Village to make it economically viable. At the present time, the TOR program is too expensive for a higher dense village. As density increases, average prices come down. . Remove the minimum required purchase amount of $25,000 for a Base TOR and instead let the market work to detennine TOR prices. . Protect existing TOR holders but drastically revamp the current program such that it is less costly to develop in receiving areas. . Encourage the establishment of mitigation banks in the Rural Fringe for listed species. . Another option to consider is to establish separate overlays for each of the four distinct Rural Fringe development areas, similar to the North Belle Meade Overlay which has its own set of development standards. . The current Rural Fringe provisions of the GMP already call for the County to consider the feasibility of establishing a "TOR Bank" to be administered by the County or some other non-for- profit government, or quasi governmental agency with the objective of making funds available to support the TDR program by ofJering initial minimal purchase prices of TDR credits. The County should create a TDR hank. . Consider allowing owners of large tracts in the Rural Fringe the option of utilizing the standards and procedures of the RLSA program. . Allow for the ability to transfer a certain percentage of density credits from the RLSA to the Rural Fringe. . There is a need to have different more favorable treatment for owners of Sending Land parcels of twenty (20) acres or less to facilitate their participation. 13 Public Participation JanuGlY 20ll Bee E4R Adoption Hearing . Extend the early entry bonus another 2 years, due to the protracted real estate and economIc slowdown. AFFORDABLE HOUSING . Create jobs to minimize the need for atfordable housing. Programmatic . Eliminate impact fees for affordable housing units. Policy 2./ (J Housing Element . Utilize existing housing stock fllr affordable housing, e.g. j(,reclosure properties. Observational . Provide for various stages of transitional housing for varying income levels. Policy 2.2 Housing Element . Mandate affordable housing within all developments: residential and mixed-use. Policy 1.3 Housing Element . Provide public transportation proximate to atIordable housing units. Policy 2.11 Housing Element . Deter impact fees for affordable housing. Policy 2.1 (J Housing Element . Provide density bonus incentives t(lr the development of atJ(,rdable housing units within mixed-use developments. Policy 2.9 Hou.l'inX Element . Stop the perpetual loss of atJ(,rdablc housing units by prohibiting the conversion of those units to market rate units. (Property owners receive the benetit of increased density for constructing atfordablc units, but then these unit types eventually go away and become market rate units.) ProgrammaTic In addition to the public comments received at the three designated public participation meetings, two written pieces of public comments were received by the County and are provided on the following pages. 14 Puhlic Purlicipaliol1 January ]011 Bee' EAR Adoption Hearing A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 850 PARK SHORE DRIVE TRIANON CENTR~: THIRD FLOOR NAPLES, FL 34103 239.649.2708 DIRECT 239.649.6200 MAiN 239.261.3659 FAx banderson(iyralaw.com I_&)ANDRESS II March 12,2010 VIA E-MAIL David Weeks, Growth Management Manager Collier County Community Development Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FLl 34104 Michael Bosi, Comprehensive Planning Manager Collier County Community Development Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FLl 34104 Re: Evaluation and Appraisal Report for Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Gentlemen: The purpose of this correspondence is to provide public comments for the statutorily required Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Please include this in the record for the March 15 EAR workshop, which I will be unable to attend. This letter concerns itself solely with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (Rural Fringe). The Slate Road 846 Land Trust knows that some important changes are necessary for a viable program in the Rural Fringe to conserve environmentally sensitive lands and avoid urban sprawl by providing for areas where clustered development is appropriate and encouraged. The Transfer of Development Rights program (TDR) was intended to accomplish those goals, however, the program has not functioned as intended despite the additions of TDR Bonus Credits. If the TDR program is to be continued and strengthened we suggest consideration of some of the following: 1. Allow owners of Receiving Lands to convert a portion of those lands to Sending Lands in order to get more TDRs to use on their remaining Receiving Lands. This process should be available through a rezoning-like process rather than requiring a comprehensive plan amendment 2. Increase the TDR Credits formula for Base TDRs to more than the current one (I) base TDR per five (5) acres. In designated Receiving Areas allow a density of greater than one unit per acre with the use of TDRs and not limit density above one unit per acre to only Rural Villages. Non-villages should be able to go up to 2 units per acre. Like the RLSA, rural villages should be able to go up to 4 units per acre. 3. Remove/modify the very detailed and unworkable requirements for development of a Rural Village. Increase the TDR Bonus multiplier in a Rural Village to make it ClEVaAND TOlIDO AKRON COWMllU5 ONQNNAU WASHINGT'ON, D.C. TAllAHASSEE ORU.NOO foRT MYBlS NAI'US foRT UUOf.RDALE 612283 v_01 1000ooo.0784 www.ralaw.com 15 David Weeks, Michael Bosi March 12,2010 Page 2 economically viable. At the present time, the TDR program is too expensive for a higher dense village. As density increases, average price comes down. 4. Rcmove the minimum required purchase amount of $25,000 for a Base TDR and instead let the market work to determine TDR prices. 5. Protect existing TDR holders but drastically revamp thc current program such that it is less costly to develop in receiving areas. 6. Encourage thc establishment of mitigation banks in the Rural Fringe for listed species. 7, Another option to consider is to establish separate spccific overlays for each of the four distinct Rural Fringe development areas, similar to the North Belle Mcade Overlay which has its own set of development standards. 8. The current Rural Fringe provisions of the GMP already call for the County to consider the feasibility of establishing a "TDR Bank" to be administered by the County or some other not-for-profit government, or quasi governmental agency with the objective of making funds available to support the TDR program by offering initial minimal purchase prices ofTDR credits. The County should create a TDR bank. 9. Consider allowing owners of large tracts in the Rural Fringe the option of utilizing the standards and procedures of the RLSA program. 10. Allow for the ability to transfer a certain percentage of density credits from the RLSA to the Rural Fringe. 11. There is a need to have different more favorable treatment for owners of Sending Land parcels of twenty (20) acres or less to facilitate their participation in the TDR program, 12. Extend the early bonus another 2 years, due to the protracted real estate and economic slowdown. Sincerely, , I \(fov-t,;J~-,,~-,--- R. Bruce Anderson For the Firm RBAlca 612283 v_OI \000000.0784 16 Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments by W James Flanagan IlI08-26-IO COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPT 2011 EAR - EV ALUA nON AND APPRAISAL REPORT REVIEW OF PUBLIC COMMENTS FRAMING OF GROWTH PLAN AND ITS ELEMENTS FOR EAR REVIEW According to the Department of Community Affairs, in their letter of understanding of Major Issues dated December 4, 2009, the director states that "I am confident that the EAR will contain a comprehensive assessment and evaluation ofthe effectiveness of the County's Comprehensive Plan in achieving goals related to the major issues, as well as identifYing the necessary EAR- based amendments for achieving those goals." The Major Issues to be addressed in the EAR are as follows: MI I. Concurrency Management, MI2. Climate Change, MI3. Urban Development Patterns, M14. Water Resource Protection MI5. Intergovernmental Coordination MI6. Affordable Housing MI7. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA) M18. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) The Collier County Growth Management Plan Elements and related Goals Plans and Objectives are outlined as follows: El. Capital Improvement Element (CIE) I Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 30 Policies E2, Transportation Element (TE) t Goal incorporating t 2 Objectives incorporating 65 Policies E3. Public Facilities Element [Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element (SS) 1 Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 22 Policies E4, Potable Water Sub-Element (PW) 1 Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 28 Policies ES, Drainage Sub-Element t Goal incorporating 6 Objectives incorporating 19 Policies E6. Solid Waste Sub-Element (SW) 1 Goal incorporating 3 Objectives incorporating 15 Policies E7, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGWAR) 1 Goal incorporating 5 Objectives incorporating 2 I Policies ES, Housing Element (HE) I Goal incorporating 8 Objectives incorporating 50 Policies E9. Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE) I Goal incorporating 8 Objectives incorporating 27 Policies EI0, Couservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) 13 Goals incorporating 47 Objectives incorporating 222 Policies Ell. Intergovernmental Coordioation Element (ICE) 1 Goal incorporating 3 Objectives incorporating ] 5 Policies Page I of 10 17 Comments - EAR Puhlic Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments hy W. James FlanaganllI 08-21i-10 EU. Future Laud Use Element (FLUE) I Goal incorporating 7 Objectives incorporating 49 Policies RLSA Overlay - RLSA Policies .,'egregated in Future Land Use Element ] Goal incorporating 5 Ohjectives incorporating 76 Policics El3, Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) 7 Goals incorporating 17 Objectives incorporating 47 Policies E14, lmmokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP) 6 Goals incorporating 13 Ohjectivcs incorporating 41 Policies EIS. Economic Element (EE) 1 Goal incorporating 6 Objectives incorporating 37 Policies Note: The Collier County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan as it currently stands incorporates 39 Goals. incorrorating 155 Ohjectives and 764 Policies. This summation is taken from the Collier County' Growth Management Plan. J am hoping to bring light and improvement to the EAR Public Comment Process. I attended all three EAR public meetings, and provided input and addressed concerns to staff as it developed. The scope and outline of the Gro\\1h Management Plan \\'as not addressed in creating a framework for addressing Major Issues \vith Grmvth Plan Elements, and their Goals, Objectives and Policies to bring perspective and focus to a means for opinion, measure, assessment and evaluation. Furthermore. there was no basis or baseline established itlr the public or the staff to effectively provide qualitative or quantitative measureahle a<:;sessrnent and/or evaluation of the effectiveness of the County's Comprehensive Plan in achieving goals related to the major issues. As such, public comment could not he provided in illllcans ofmc<I,:>urL'rncnt and assessment of goals. objectives and policies.- which is the purpose of the EAR- Evaluation and Appraisal Report process. A means for framing a public perspective of the Cirmvth Management Plan is missing from the process. and a public/County hasis of measurement. and qualitative and quantitative measurement and ao;;sessment tools arc also missing from the EAR process. Certain comments pertaining to the issues. although relevant to the public's perspective, are/vvere also not keyed to Growth Plan C;oals Objectives and Policies. The StaffWiLs then len to interpret where the puhlic comments on the Major Issues hest fit under the Gro\vth Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies for each and all clements. Interpretation of the comment. association and consolidation of the puhlic comments arc therefore let) to sta1Ts interpretation of the public comments and staffs determination and their a.';;sociatioll \vith the Cif()\vth Plan's Goals. Objectives and Policies_ and how they should/might he related to the Major Issues and visa versa. As well. a revisit and review' with the Puhlic regarding stafes interpretation of the Public's comment is not made pari of the process, thereby dosing thc ioop on Puhiic Comment. Some comments were labeled hy StalT as "'Observational"" and '.Programmatic" and ""GGAMP Restudy". There is a concern that these commcnts mayor may not he considered in the EAR process hecause these concerns were not - in staffs opinion, interpretation and perspective- attributable to specific Gro\\ih Plan's Goals Ohjectives and Policies. Such comments should carry some value - in new policies to he considered and in ineffective policies abandoned or made effective. The Puhlic Perception must be accounted for as \velL especially relative to the Observational and Programmatic labeled comments. These should translate to an accountable action and measurable resrmnse. Page 2 of 10 18 Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments by W. James Flanagan III 08-26-10 As well, one of the Major Issues identified to be addressed in the EAR per the DCA Letter of Understanding ignored -- MI I. Concurrency Management. Instead, comments were requested on the subject of Transportation without respect or reference to a Major issue as outlined in DCA's letter, and without perspective or reference to Concurrency Management. Concurrency extends well beyond Transportation, and affects all County Services, infrastructure and Growth Aspects. Concurrency needs to also address Water, Sewer, Solid Waste, Schools, Public Safety, Parks and Recreation, County Government infrastructure and all aspects of community and planning. This was not the case in this EAR process. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Need for Effective and Measurable Job Growth Element One aspect missing from concurrency and in Growth Management Planning overall is effective and measureable private employment planning. Current efforts for job creation have been narrow in scope and in some cases, expending an inordinate amount of taxpayer money without substantial and measureable success in creation of high-wage jobs or diversification of the local economy. The growth management plan should develop means and planning for the attraction of a broad range of industries and coordinate location within the communities created. Such an approach should be focused to minimize traffic and impacts across the County and contribute to the sustainability and viability of a local work-supported approach to jobs within the communities workforce locale. Past planning has created massive residential housing developments with no other uses and no other opportunities for job creation from within the created POO. This fails the rest of the County and increases demands for services without benefit of stabilization and broadening of the County's employment base IClr all thc ncw people contained in such residential-only communities. Re-evaluation of Planned Population Centers Conceptually, the Coastal Urban Zone -- West ofCR951 -- Are mostly built out, subject to infill and minor long tenn population increases. As well, the Estates care conceptually built out -- the approximate 2010 population of 27,607 (per the East of 951 Horizon Study) is projected to grow to 80,000 within the established limits of the platted subdivision. The driving impact of population growth County-wide lies in the RLSA -- the East of 951 Horizon Study projects a population in the RLSA of over 389,193 at Build-out in an area that currently has a population of approximately 12,000. The fiscal, physical and administrative demands of providing services, transportation and infrastructure in a remote, discO!U1ccted and mostly undeveloped agricultural and wetlands environment will create an inordinate demand on tax revenues, resources and County function. The remote location for massive development and population will require an inequitably high cost of developing transportation systems, infrastructure and connectivity are conflicting with Agricultural preservation. conservation. reduction in greenhouse gasses, reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (YMTs) and other Goals Objectives and Poticies found in non-RLSA aspects of the Growth Management Plan. Reconsideration should be made relative to the cost and impacts of such remote development, and such review should be made on a County-wide and fiscal basis cquitable to all communities of the County. Page 3 of 10 19 Comments - EAR Puhlic Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments hy W. .lames Flanagan][[ 08-26-10 Demand for communities in such a remote location as the RLSA should be challenged and/or re- evaluated. Attractions and assets that make Collier County a demand location - access to the beach, proximity to Interstate Highway system. quality transportation systems, proximity to International Airport, convenient attractive communities ~ lose much luster and attraction in remote rural locations disconnected from the urban coastal zone. A study of Ave Maria's successes and failures might well reveal some of the causes for its current challenges regardless of the current economic dOv./llturn. Engaging the Community, Politicizing Growth Management, Unilateral Decision-making The perspectives of some suggest that the planning and decision processes are politicized. Decisions are made regardless of Staff recommendations and Planning Commission recommendations. Engagement of communities affected are limited to 3-minute speeches at public hearings and the efforts of several organizations to involve their communities in the process and decisions are secondary. Efforts arc need to be taken to change the process and attitudes by actively and effectively engaging the cOllllllunities atTeetcd. Stakeholders typically include land-owners, abutters and developers. Various organizations involved in the interest of the future of their community should he considered stakeholders as well. Over many years, numerous contentious projects have heen pushed through the community without engagement and endeannent ofthc residents. This perspective is the basis of the current fight for Amendment 4 - the \'ision of the Communit), v.'as being created \\'ithout the Community. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension was promoted as necessary to the Estates community and not for the purposes of the private communities planned for East of DesSoto (Big C)'prcss/ Ave Maria). For years, County Commissioners and Staff denied the fact that YBR Extension \vas to serve the RLSA populations. Decisions were made and properties \vere taken, and alternative solutions to traffic \.....ere not pursued and effectively ignored. Transportation engagement \\'3S not. Stevie Tomato's fiasco \vas a failure in the planning and approval process that misplaced a commercial operation in direct conflict \vith residential peace, privacy and quiet enjoyment. Similar approaches were made to accclcrJte the \videning of Oil \\lell Road. Work was accelerated and funded prior to the realization of a projected population and prior to the collection of assessable Impact Fees required prior to the funding and construction of Oil Well Road. \\-'hen the \\'idening of Oil Well Road was approved even v.,'ithout concurrency. a middle section ofthl' road \vas deferred, promoted as a co:>t-savings measure, but truthfully' associated \\'ith the realignment of R3ndall Blvd and that section of Oil Vielj H.oad to meet in the proposed future Town Center of Big Cypress. 1"his re-alignment is not even depicted 011 the 2030 LRTP, )Tt is ,-vidc!y known. Such politicizing, posturing and misrepresentations have led to skepticism. cynicism and mistrust of the planning process and decisiolls that come out of it. In some cases, private interests are circumventing and manipulating a puhlic process and the fiscal impacts to the public are committed to without buy-in and support. and in some cases - against the will and desires ufthe Communities affected. The mantra of Growth Pa)'s for (Jrowth has been a hard fiscal lesson -- and its untruth has been exposed. Page 4 of 10 20 Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments by W James Flanagan 111 08-26-10 Transportation disconnection from Growth Management Another concern Transportation has long been disconnected from the Grov.'lh Management process. Decisions on future roads are made outside of Growth Management processes through separate and disconnected MPO processes. One example is the 2030 Transportation Plan, which when overlayed with RLSA population projections shows high density RLSA areas of Big Cypress (4,000 - 10,000 per sq mile per 2030 Population projection maps) being served solely by a Randall Blvd/Oil Well Road intersection. No road systems are conceptually represented within this projected densely populated area east of DeSoto Blvd. As well, is an issue with a future 1-75 interchange between SR29 and CR95 I. At one point, the proposed interchange was promoted and presented in public meetings to serve the future Town of Big Cypress, and the interchange would be located from [-75 east of DeSoto north to the future Town of Big Cypress. This seemed to make good sense - thc major population projcctcd in Big Cypress would have direct access to ]-75 on a limited access roadway. More recently, an effort by the Transportation Department unilaterally narrowed the focus to three choices of interchange design for Everglades Blvd as the location of the Interchange. Transportation removed the Big Cypress interchange from presentation, option and discussion. The change to Everglades Blvd as the 1-75 interchange will translate to hundreds eminent domain takings and hundreds of residential driveways accessing onto on a major evacuation route. Such decisions cannot be rushed based solely on time-constrained (immediate availability) of Federal Funding for Interchange Design. That approach is short-tenned and short-sighted. (Note that Policy 6.1.2 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to initiate a study of a potential interchange in the vicinitv of J- 75 and Everglades Blvd. The County will Continue to implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinitv of 1-75 and Everglades Blvd.) I suggest the language should be changed to "'a potential eastern interchange along the 1-75 Corridor" to express the true needs and intent, especially relative to the major populations projected in the RLSA area. As well, a suggestion by a member at a civic association meeting where Emergency Management Director Dan Summers was to ensure that an emergency egress at Everglades Blvd and 1-75 existed, or for minimal expense - could be created in short time. This comment was made as an Emergency Management Catastrophe Preparation goal and that such an access was regardless of any 1-75 Interchange now or in the future - and it was suggested as a Temporary Emergency- Only Evacuation Egress from Everglades Blvd to 1-75 to be prepared for use in case of catastrophic emergency. Civic suggestions for proactive emergency preparedness have since been manipulated and retranslated as a desire for an Evergladcs/I-75 Intcrchange. (Reference Policy 7.3.1) [ suggest this policy is relevant and action needed to be taken to achieve item b. as a minimum. The bridge study promotes local connectivity and egress, and the Improved emergency access from Everglades Blvd to 1-75 is a critical evacuation egrcss point that needs to be opened in catastrophic emergencies like wildfire, hurricanes and other natural disasters. The whole [-75/Everglades Interchange needs to be reconsidered and a proper comprehensive look at the 1-75 Corridor and its future interchanges. The review should be an [-75 Corridor Interchange Study, and not specific to Evcrglades I3lvd. Page 5 of] 0 21 Comments - E4R Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments by W James F1anaganllf 08-26-10 Private Water and Sewer in the Estates During the EAC forum for the EAR, the Chairwoman requested that consideration be made for public utilities in the Estates as a means for protecting water resources. Similar comments were made by the Chair of the East of95] Horizon Oversight Committee. The implication of these comments is that septic systems are undesirable and incapable of sustainability, and that only a public system can protect the water resources. The East of 95 t Horizon Study explored the cost and feasibility of utilities in the Estates and the public response \Vas against public utilities in the Estates, both on a cost basis and a principle basis that private systems are effective and sustainable, efficient and scientifically viable. Together with an effort to incentivize joining of non-conforming 5111all10t5 to conforming lots, a viable la\\' density sustainable green community can flourish \\-'ithaut urbanization and public utilities. Given some people's arguments against the existence of septic s)'stems. one must still consider a~ v.-'cll that bears do still "go" in the woods. Rural Standards \'s. Urban Standards One thing lost in the process of Collier County Ciro\vth Managemcnt is that there arc no rural community or development standards. Densities and setbacks and functional criteria have been developed from an urban perspective and little regard is made from a perspective of rural existence. Golden Gate Estates is a rural community \\Iith rural perspectives, rural needs, and rural character, and finds conflict when held to urban standards that don't relate with rural living. Recognition of a need for a distinct rural standard is the beginning of addressing some of the issues in the Estates and bring focus to the unique sustainable community it is. Master Mobility Plan - Limited but Parallel Crowtb Managemen!'? The Master Mobility Plan is being introduced into the EAR. In reading the brief overview of its outline beginning on page xiii, it appears that many of the goals and strategies are functional components of the Gro\\1h Management Plan and should he contained as measurable achievements \\'ithill various goals, objectives and policies. The MMP proposes to Prepare Infrastructure Master Plan, Land Use Master Plan. Mobility Master Plan, Wildlife Crossings and I labitat Preservation Master Plan. Puhiic Workshops for a Drali Vision Plan Mapl Evaluate effects of land use scenario on transportation plan. all items of planning that are currently under the cover ofCol1ier County Growth Management PIJn..1\ concern is the Master Mohility Plan hecOInes a parallel hut separate Growth Management Plan Cor focused and limited scope of work \vithin the Grmvth Management Plan. [a111 concerned that the Master Mobility Plan \\'il1 morph into a document of overwhelming and inc1Tective volullle of goals f10licies and ohjectives that will require two revicvv processes (E/\R/~,lMP) and a third process to reconcile the 1wo. Is this a resul1 nflhe H'cog!l!tion nf1he dic;c()nnl:C! hcl'-\('('n Tnmsl'!')f1a1!()11 and (~rov,,!h Management? A concern also underlies the drive hehind the Master Mobility effort is for the creation of new and expended revenues as a replacement for now non-existent Impact Fee Revenues. Page 6 of 10 22 Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments by W. James FlanaganlII 08-26-10 From such tough lessons and negative community experiences, positive community efforts and perspectives are being promoted in such efforts as the Estates Bill of Rights - an effort by the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association to introduce rural community ideals and standards into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. The Estates Bill of Rights is intended as a prelude to instigate discussion of community concepts and ideas in advance of the GGAMP Restudy so that such concepts and ideas can be discussed and vetted within the Restudy process. Other Civic Associations and organizations are also promoting ideas. Visioning of a community has many perspectives, and those perspectives become especially dear to the Community when impacts, decisions and plans are made for the Community by entities outside of the Community. Comments and Corrections from review of the draft Collier County 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - EAR EAC - Workshop Edition - received 08-16-10 Regarding Chapter I - Public Participation The items within each category should be numbered. One line item bulleted on page 3 references "Regarding Item #2.... and none of any items are numbered, only 'bulleted'. As well, Under Eastern Lands (RLSAIRFMlJD) - the last item - indicates "County Government not providing awareness of development schedule of C.R.95]." ] believe this item refers to the developments East of 951 - the proposed Town of Big Cypress and other future population centers in the RLSA where impacts, plans, roads, interchanges etc., are not being shared with the surrounding communities most impacted by these future populations. IE: Oil Well Road Widening and "pha.;;ed" widening with its middle-section a consideration tor future development. Some Public Comments that were made and recorded at the three EAR Public Participation Meetings but not incorporated into Chapter I Public Comment are as follows, and the EAR should be revised to include these comments and relative goal, objective and/or policy reference: Urban Development Patterns I. Urban Growth/Services Boundaries not established yet -. Define and establish 2. "A reference was made that Road corridors serving the urban areas should be routed around the rural areas so as to maintain community character" Staff noted this item as a GGAMP Restudy item, yet the intent of the discussion/comment was to mitigate and minimize roadway. traffic and population impacts of RLSA urbanized developments on surrounding rural communities and preserves. (IE previously proposed Big Cypress Parkway and 1-75 Interchange to access Big Cypress) 3. "'Plans for east of951 aren't flexible enough to accommodate change in gro\\ith rate" The thought on this was East of 95] needs to have a comprehensive approach- RLSA/RFMUD/Estates/lmmokalee/Rural Lands/Ag Lands/Preserves - and each cannot ignore the effects of localized Growth Management planning on other communities. All communities need to be engaged in a comprehensive pImming and review process. 4. Need for a Community Center in Golden Gate Estates should reflect a Level-of- Service/Planning Need/Capital Improvement Element Policy t.4. Staff notes item as 'observational' Page 7 of 10 23 Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments hy W. .lames Flanagan III Ofl-26-jO Transportation I. Access and availability to Public Transit needs improvement - Beacb Access. Park & Ride Lots, Employment Centers, Apartment Complexes. etc. 2. Bike lanes should be incorporated in resurfacing/road expansion projects 3. Decisions on Long Term Transportation Plans need to engage the public and those affected before the decisions arc made. Land Use Modeling excludes public participation on where population and road assumptions are made. Engage the Public. Stake Holders, Surrounding Communities in the fonnative function of community/transportation planning. Incorporate Transportation (road planning) in the County's Comprehensive Planning process - do not isolate and segregate transportation decisions and planning with the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). 4. Transportation needs to be made part of the GrO\vth Management and Plan Review Process. 5. Road Systems are being proposed that hi-sect rural Golden Gate Estates to serve the urbanized RLSA and Eastern Lands. Other altematives are necessary to mitigate the transportation, traffic and population impact on the rural communit), and character of Golden Gate Estates. 6. Paving of I.imerock Roads needs to he completed. Work is secondary priority to Major road expansion project yet minimal cost overa]1. Eastern Lands - (RI.SA-RFMUD) 1. Lack of Participation in the RFMlJD TDR program says the program doesn't work. 2. Application Process of TDR Program is preferential to certain conveying agencies and unfair. 3. County should develop a standard unified format 1()r Land Management Plan acceptable at all agencies participating in the TDR program 4. County should be stud) ing impacts of RLSA potential development and their effects on Estates (i.e. Transportation, Trame, quality of life. environmental impacts, flood impacts, \\.etlands mitigation. water quality. \\ater quantity) Address current and future costs to the Count)'ltaxpayer associated with urhan development in existing rurallagriculturaI/conscT\'Jtion low density ]0\1. use Eastern Lands) 5. County/RLSA needs to engage Estates and surrounding communities in planning process. Issues need to he addressed comprehensively countywide and not exclusively wiilhin the RLSA area/process. Serious Concerns have been raised about the effects ofthc projected 400.00 people in the RLSA cast of DeSoto Blvd on F:states/lmmokalee/Collier County. 6. LRTP not shmving RLS/\ Transportation projections, however population projections exist Itlf the RLSA. RI.SA FI.UE Map missing jj-Olll County website, yet referenced hy note on the C.(\unty.s FLlJE Map currently p()~ted on \vensite. Affordable Housing " 1. County docs not do enough to encourag.e or mandate Affordable Housing. 'Workforce Housing should not be limited/targeted to County Employees In-]a\\i Guest Houses as affordable housing Promote equitable distribution of atTordable housing throughout Collier County. Address saturation rates of affordable housing relative to economic condition, current and future. 3. 4. Page 8 of J 0 24 Comments - EAR Public Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments by W James Flanagan III 08-26-10 Water Resource Protection 1. In the need for County Watershed Plan needing to be holistic, holistic in terms of not just water, but development, mitigation, environment, and especially coordination of resources, planning and responsibilities between multiple agencies with diverging and separate interests (DEP/ACOE/SFWMDfBig Cypress Basin/Collier Soil & Water Conservation/Collier County Utilities/City of Naples Utilities/Division of Forestry/Fire Districts/Emergency Management/FEMA) Other General Comments made 1. Cat System doesn't serve/access Collier County Beaches 2. Library Hours insufficient Chapters 2 & 3 - Drafts - General observations Lack of time and subsequent issue ofIater draft (CCPC Workshop Draft) have prevented me from substantive review of Chapters 2 & 3 of the EAR. however, I can offer a couple of comments in my recent skimming of the EAC Draft and what I was able to scan as I printed out the latest CCPC Workshop Draft. I. Throughout the Elements a rephrasing and refonnatting is suggested - what is the proposed rephrasing and intent of reformatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies? 2. References to Standards of various reports inserted as rcference without defining and stating the desired reference can and will lead to unintended association of irrelevant details in the future, potentially resulting in mis-association, irrelevancy, misinterpretation, and unintended consequences. 3. Changes of References from one to another (updating) assumes that the reference standards have been compared and analyzed for relevancy, consistency, intent and specifics. Can this be confirmed? Does the new standard warrant reference and/or inclusion of spceific provisions applicable? Without defining and stating the desired reference can and will lead to unintended association of irrelevant details in the future, potentially resulting in mis-association, irrelevancy, misinterpretation, and unintended consequences. (reference for example Drainage Sub-element Policy 6.2 and the suggested revision notes) 4. Regarding the County's recommendation for incorporation of a Randall Blvd Flyover and a 951/41 Flyover and the Everglades Interchange into Policy 6.5 of the Transportation clement, this means of policy revision seems to circumvent a process of review and comprehensive planning to take specific transportation projects and commit and define them through an editing of the Growth Management Plan/EAR review. Why is policy 6.5 to continue as a policy? The existing policy refers, an 1-75/Golden Gate Parkway Interchange and a grade-separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The County states, "the projects listed in this policy have been completed and renders this policy obsolete". Page 9 of 10 25 Comments - EAR Puhlic Process and Growth Management Concerns Comments hy W James Flanagan III U8-J6-]O Why then is the County recommending to introduce three nc\\.' projects not specific to the original policy 6.5. I am concerned that Grow1h Management and Transportation planning are being executed by editorial changes to the GMP without public process and vetting - and this on future major road projects. What is the purpose of introducing these projects specifically into the GM? Transportation Element? What is the intent of adding these items and what does it do to commit and change any public review process or County Planning commitments - financially, or otherv..'ise. Should not this existing policy 6.5 he removed as these projects now exist and are no longer a part of the Growth Management Plan Transportation Element? And shouldn't any new policy introducing new and speci11c projects be required to go through a GMP review process? This approach raises concerns in both the process and the motives. Concluding Remarks The forgoing are concerns for discussion \\:,hich I v..'ould like to incorporate into the EAR and the EAR review process, and with the hopes to see forward that the issues and concerns be addressed, considered and discussed. \vith the Public being an engaged and active participant in the decisions of the future of our communities. Respectfully, W. James Flanagan III 280 22m] Ave NE Naples FI. 341 ~() 239-352-6352 78]-~54-891() Page 10 of 10 ~6 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8848 www.collicrgo\..net FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT(E.A.R.) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 2010 6:00 P.M. The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Development & Environmental Services Division, on Monday, January 2Sh, at 6:00 p.m., will hold a Public Meeting at the North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall, Room A, located at 15000 Livingston Road, Naples, FL, 34119, Collier County, Florida. Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes requires local governments to adopt an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) once every seven years, with the purpose of assessing the progress in implementing the local government's comprehensive plan, The EAR evaluates how successful a local government has been in addressing major community land use planning issues through implementation of its comprehensive plan, suggests revisions to better address the community's vision, and addresses changes mandated by State requirements. From a statutory perspective, the EAR evaluates the effectiveness, successes, and failures of the various Elements of the local government comprehensive plan at a specific point in time. Ultimately, the recommendations contained in the EAR become the basis for proposed amendments to the County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). Collier County adopted its last EAR in 2004. For more information, contact Mike Bosi, AICP, Community Planning Manager, at 252-6819, or e-mail michaelbosiilJ!.collicm.ov.nct or Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, at 252-8498 or email carolinavalcra({/icollier!!.oV.lLC), -End- 27 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8848 W\l'w.collicn!H\".nct FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING EV ALUA TION & APPRAISAL REPORT (E.A.R.) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2010 6:00 P.M. The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Development & Environmental Services Division. on Tuesday, February 23rd, at 6:00 p.m., will hold a Public Meeting at the UF/IFAS Extension Education & Training Center located at 14700 lmmokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120, Collier County. Florida. Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes requires local governments to adopt an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) once every seven years, with the purpose of assessing the progress in implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. The EAR evaluates how successful a local government has been in addressing major community land use planning issues through implementation of its comprehensive plan, suggests revisions to better address the community's vision, and addresses changes mandated by State requirements. From a statutory perspcctive, the EAR evaluates the effectiveness, successes, and failures of the various Elements of the local government comprehensive plan at a specific point in time, Ultimately, the recommendations contained in the EAR become the basis for proposed amendments to the County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). Collier County adoptcd its last EAR in 2004. For more infonnation, contact Mike Bosi, Aiel', Community Planning Manager, at 252-6819, or e-mailm.h.Jl<lclbosi(Lc.l..ljjcrg..\!1c.[orCarolinaValcra.PrincipaIPlanner.at 252-8498 or elnail ~jiUlljl)d,-i:!J_~JjJi! ~;~UE~_l};i)\ -End- 28 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8848 www.collien.!ov.nct FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (E.A.R.) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MONDAY, MARCH 15, 2010 6:00 P.M. The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department of Community Development & Environmental Services Division, on Monday, March 15th, at 6:00 p.m., will hold a Public Meeting at the Collier County Board of County Commissioners BCC Chambers, 3rd Floor Administration Building (Bldg, F) 3301 E. Tamiami Trail. Naples. FL 34112. Collier County, Florida. Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes requires local governments to adopt an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) once every seven years, with the purpose of assessing the progress in implementing the local government's comprehensive plan. The EAR evaluates how successful a local government has been in addrcssing major community land use planning issucs through implcmentation of its comprehcnsivc plan, suggcsts revisions to bettcr addrcss the community's vision, and addresscs changcs mandated by State requircments. From a statutory pcrspective, thc EAR evaluatcs thc cffectivcness, successcs, and failures of the various Elements of the local governmcnt comprehensive plan at a specific point in time. Ultimately, the recommcndations contained in the EAR become the basis for proposcd amendmcnts to thc County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). Collier County adoptcd its last EAR in 2004, For morc information, contact Mike Bosi, AICP, Community Planning Manager, at 252-6819, or e-mail michaelbosi({[IcOlIienwv.l1ct or Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, at 252-8498 or email carolinavaleraidcolli~rL'.ov.nct. -End- 29 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: (239) 252-8848 www.colliergov.net www.twitter ,cmn/CollierPI 0 www.fal.ehook.com/Collier(;ov August 11, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING COLUER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EV AUlA TION AND APPRAISAL REPORT WORKSHOP COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WEDNESDA Y, AUGUST 25, 2010 Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public workshop on August 25,20]0 at 8:30 a,m, in the Board of County Commissioners Chamhers located on the third tloor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F) Collin eounty Government Centcr. 3301 E. Tamiami Trail. Naples, FL 34112. In regard to the puhlic meeting: All interestcd partics arc invitcd to attend. and to registcr to speak and to suhmittheir ohjections, if any, in writing, to the hoard/committee prior to the mecting if applicahle. All registered public spcakers will be limited to three minutcs unless permission for additional time is granted hy the chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lohhyists shall. hefore engaging in any lobbying activities (including, hut not limited to, addrcssing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial hoard), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in ordcr to participate in this proceeding, you are cntitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Plcase contact thc Collier County Facilities Managcment Department. located at 330 I E. Tamiami Trail. Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices f'or the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Marcia Kendall at (2391 252-2387 or Michacl Bosi at (239) 252-6819. -End- 30 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: (239) 252-8848 www.collier!!ov.net www.twitter.com/Collierl. I 0 www.faccbook.com/CollicrG ov Au~ust 11, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EV ALUA TION AND APPRAISAL REPORT WORKSHOP COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA August 25, 2010 Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public workshop on August 25, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Chambers located on the third floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F) Collier County Government Center, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112. In regard to the public meeting: All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 341\2, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Marcia Kendall at (239) 252-2387 or Michael Bosi at (239) 252-6819. - End- 31 ---~-",.~.._-,--_.__.~.-,-,- ..._-_.__.-._..._-----~------,--,_..- Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: 239-252-8848 www.colliergov.net www.twitter.com/CollierPI () www,f'acehook.('llm/CllllierGov www.voutuhe,eom/Collier(;ov Octoher 27, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION ON THE ADOPTION OF THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WEDNESDA Y, NOVEMBER 3, 2010 9:00 A,M Notice is hereby given that the Environmel/tal Advisory Council wi II hold a puhlic meeting on November 3, 2010 at 9:00 a,m. in the Board of County Commissioners chambers, third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail. Naples. In regard to the puhlic meeting: All interested parties arc invited to attend, and to register to speak and to suhmit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board/commillee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will he limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-0) reyuires that all lobbyists shall. before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to. addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or yuasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you. to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department. located at 333) Tamiami Trail East. Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-)3)6, (239) 2)2-8380. at least two days prior 10 the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Michael Bosi at (23912)2-6819 or Marcia Kendall at (239) 2)2-2387. -End- 32 Collier County Government Communication & Customer Relations Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: (239) 252-8848 www.colIief!!ov.net www.twitter .comlColIierPI 0 www.facehook.('om/ColIierGov November 30, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA TION ON THE ADOPTION OF THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DECEMBER 7, 2010 8:30 A.M. (Continuation as necessary, Decemher 8, 2010) Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on December 7, 2010 at 8:30 a.m, in the Board of County Commissioncrs chambcrs, third 1l0or, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami TraiL Naples. In regard to the public mecting: All interested parties are invited to allend. and to register to spcak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the boardlcommittee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by thc chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board or quasi-judicial board), registcr with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. For more information, call Marcia Kendall at (239) 252-2387 or Michael Bosi at (239) 252-6819. -End- 33 PUJ:SLlC NUTICJ:. rU.DL.1\...- l.'tV.1.l\,...I:o NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commis- sion will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 2010 In the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples. The meeting will commence at 8:30 A,M. The purpose of the hearing is to consider recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to transmit to the Aorida Depart- ment of Community Affairs the adoption of the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAA.) to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 11 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SEVEN YEAR EVALU- ATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) FOR THE COL- LIER COUNTV' GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR TRANSMmAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA) FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW ACCORD- ING TO THE PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA OUTI.JNED IN SECTION 163.3191, FLORIDA STATUTES EVAWA~ Tl0N AND APPRAISAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PlAN" . , 1[7c..;,;~1 r-J 0 ~'" ~~. ..\ __I I-._J'i } J ---"-" r:----.-'i I '.-.--. j ___-----"'_,_,,_ .__ ""f - r--- n_ . COI_ c__ ......Id. , --l 1 11 :1 : , ~ o ~ I""",,,,~ '-'1 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment are available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive. Na~ pIes, Rorida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5;00 P.M., Mon- day through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the land Development Services Department, (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Development Services Department, prior to Tuesday, December 7, 2010, will be read and considered at the public hearing. ~=,.. I-~ i II " If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upJn which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to particiPate in this proceeding. you are entitled. at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356. (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners OffICe. Collier County Planning Commission Mark P. Strain, Chairman Nn ?311AMA.~ Nn\lAITlber?1 '010 34 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION Notice Is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners wUI hoJd a public hearing on Monday, January 31, 2011 in the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor. Col- lier County Government Center. 3299 E. Tamlami Trail. Naples, to con- sider adoption of a County Resolution. The meeting wli commence at 9:00 A.M_ The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to for- ward to the Florida Department of Community Affairs the adoption of the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR.) to the Growth Management Plan. The Resolution title is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 11-_ A RESOLUTION Of THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Of COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA REl..ATlNG TO THE 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT ON THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT P\J\N. ADOPTING TIiE EAR AND APPROVING THE 'lRANSMIlTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 163.3191. FLORIDA SlATUTES. AD interested parties are Invtted to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment are avatlable for Inspection at the Land Development Services Department. 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na- ples. Flork::la between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.. Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development Services Department, (239-252- 2387). Wrttten comments filed with the Land Development Services Department, prior to Monday, January 31, 2011, wlll be read and considered at the public hearing. ~ ~ -- I ]1 ..- 1'1 I .... ---'1--1 :1 Colli.. count. I Florid. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners wtth respect to any matter consid- ered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceed- ing. and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim re- cord of the proceedings is made. which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled. at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Faclftties Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356. (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hear- ing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Of- fice. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK By: /!:VPatricia Morgan DeptJty Clerk (SEAL) No 678185075 Januarv 10 2011 35 Chapter Two Countywide Assessment , - 163.319J.2.a Florida Statutes 2.1 - Population growth and changes in land area, including annexation, since the adoption of the original plan or the most recent update amendments. Since the 2004 EAR. the city of Naples has had six annexations comprising a land area of 441.42 acres (.69 square miles). Five out of the six annexations were of non-residential land uses or vacant residential, with the exception of the Moorings Park Mixed Use development that resulted in a slight decrease in the unincorporated population and increase in the City's population. The Moorings Park Mixed Use development is a pre-planned retirement community authorized for 594 residential units, ranging from single family detached units to individual patient rooms, the estimated population for the development is no more than 800 persons. For the municipalities of Marco Island and Everglades City, there were no annexations during the evaluation period. Annexation Year Section - Township - Acreage Land Use Range Ruffina 2004 11 - 50 -25E ]2.77 Mixed Use Eagle View 2005 27 - 49 - 25E 6.17 Commercial Moorings Park 2005 25 - 49 - 25E 82.946 Mixed Use Collier Park of 2007 35 - 49 - 25E 112.82 Industrial Commerce Hole-in-the-WaIl 2008 22 - 49 - 25E 204.73 Golf Course GC Bridges at 2009 27 - 49 -25E 21.99 Vacant Residential Gordon River TOTAL = 441,426 Annexations by the City of Naples since 2004 ArealYear 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20lO 2011 2012 U nicorporated 267.640 279.124 287,442 294,289 292.9.12 29.1.909 294.395 .100.1.16 .105.988 Incoprprated 38,546 .18.664 39,2]6 31\569 '1/)()'l'1 39,123 39,204 39.650 40.099 ,!./, ~"-"- Countywide .106.t86 .117.788 326.658 .1.1.1.8:;8 .1.12.8:;4 .1~3.032 .1.1.1.600 .1.19,786 .146.087 Noll'S: 1. 2004 - 2009 an: estimates and 2()] 0-201:2 an: hased upon BLBR pmjccliollS, prepared by [he Comprehensive Planning Depanment _ Population Growth & Annexation - 1 .;(- it .. Ue<-a CJ "'ft.,_t'liI.~ ,)I"",-'.ll(', """"';'''T','~:' .... r"".".,'''''"''< "~I: ~., ,-,"."'" ,.. " '~,_ .'."" -0' ,.....'tt' ,.,' ,..q '~""l' ,..."t." ",."...~"r ,.,'......' ',d:"' "";"".'" ~ History of annexations by the City of Naples ..-.;.".....- ,- ,'>, " ,/.-... '{J..' j - .~ \ \ t , I , , \ i , " I , I , i , ,1. ,'. 1.-' .---,' ,. I ",-' ;,. ~' ......_;;c~..~..: l.'~.lri~~~~~ . l::f,. . " ".,~; ""::."!~ , .. i i i , \ ~~i::, \~:~'~ \l\.~:) .'. i~1 '. I ,-~' '-,- '~'.. i , , I......."" ! ;...""f , '; , I \ e'; I I \ .-l ;.,~ \, \ \ \ ',--- ...-------~--- :...N1"n:,:,4,T1(~~- HJSTOR'!, Y' .'_. .""" .:;;": _....-,.::- : ..'" o.".~ P.: "~,.I" iil J. '\/,1;,- '"iilr',li 163.3/9/.2.b Florida Stlltutn 2,2 - The location of nisting development in relation to the location of develo[Jmcnt '" anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to assess the Character and Magnitude of Land Use, in Collier County a study of the four major land uses (Developed, Undeveloped, Conservmion/Preservation and Agricultural) was conducted for each of the 12 Planning Communiti.:s !()r the 2004 ('oIlier FAR imd to provide consistency in analysis the same structure of comparison was preformed tor the 201] EAR. The analysis (see Table 2.1) demonstrates that development in lmincorporated Collier County is not only concentrated within the Urban Planning Communities (North Naples, Central Naples, East Naples, South Naples Golden Gaie, Marco, Urban Estates and [mmokalee), but has been experienced in the Rural Planning Communities (Royal Fakapalm, Big Cypress, Rural Estates and Corkscrew), as well. These communities, while remaining largely undeveloped, have experienced a larger pereentage of grow1h in developed lands compared against the Urban Planning Communities. The development within the rural planning communities has placed a greater cost for the provision of services to the county's infrastructure providers, as distance is a primary tactor within the calculation of cost of service. It should be noted that due to the larger percentage of dedicated conservation/preservation designation that the majority of the acres contained within these communities will remain wldeveloped. ~ Table 2.1 Character and Magnitude of land(Prepared in 2009) Planning Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total % of land Community land*(less Ag) land (less Ag) Preservation land Acres Developed North Naples 13,500 4,381 501 1,123 19,505 69.21% Central Naples 5,743 702 61 156 6,662 86,21% East Naples 3,853 807 19 1,186 5,865 65.69% South , 2,530 Naples 7,543 989 1,517 12,579 59.97% Golden Gate 6,863 1,254 46 137 8,300 82.69% Marco 1,486 4,741 12,472 1,510 20,209 7,35% Urban I Estates 14,376 3,474 288 2,904 21,042 68,32% Immokalee 5,041 789 1,137 10,788 17,755 28.39% i Rural , I 39.45% i Estates 29,634 28,950 114 16,426 75,124 I I Corkscrew , 12,603 13,464 20,672 134,427 181,166 6.96% i i i 75,7151 . Royal L I i Fakapalm 10,104 36,441 230,698 352,958 2.86% I Existing v. Anticipated Development - . Big Cypress , 21,218 i 210 : , r-~------ -r-----.--------t---- : Total : 131,964 , 97,743 ' '-.- 1 _~"_.___ -L-..---__"_____._~.___.,._, --- ----- (Source' 2009 Property Appraiser Records & Collie; Count', GiS datal ___.?63,65~, : 8}0-,-~55 L 11.220 596,306 ! __~_.~.___.____ ___m__" 257,109 [ U17,471. _____n____. _ _ _____.._ n_'______ 03.56% 10.0 'includes developed ResidentiaL CornrrercLOlI. industnai institutll.WEli U"e iane! I::;()v~r'lr"'ent. Gajf \>.JJses and R-Cl-',,,," Utility OutCCQ[ ;~ec land er,:.:: Planning Community North Naples Central Naples East Naples South I Naples Golden Gate Developed Undeveloped Conservation Land* (less Ag1--i- Land (Ies~'Agl I Preservation I -=--r , 13,109 ~_ 3,547 ~_ 477 I ~:::~ ------- :~lt_m------ ~~ 6,281 2,206 1,100 5,923 2,028 46 898 4,512 12,425 I I 12,291 4,776 4,052 10,617 2,992 303 2,374 I Marco Urban Estates Immokalee Rural Estates 21,764 36,998 125 Corkscrew 7,959 12,166 19,522 ! Royal I I Fakapalm ____ 8,191 ~__ _m 41,280 ~__ __--226,621 Big Cypress t--- 19,912 ~ __. 92 f--m- __ 563,507 I Total I 110,097 i 110,057 I .__..J!.25,464 (Source: 2003 Property Appraiser Records & Collier County GIS data) 4,467 1,036 232 1,326 16,237 141,519 76,866 12,795 _~1,853 I 19,505 ~- 67,21% I 6,662 80.05%-1 5,865 62.40% I 12,579 49.93% I I 8,300 71.36% I 20,209 4.44% 21,042 17,755 75,124 181,166 352,958 596,306 1,317,471 \ 58.410' I 26.9(, " I 28, 97% ! I 4.39% , -" 2.32% I I 3.34% i 8,36% : , . Includes developed Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Use land, Government, Golf Courses and R-O-W, Utility, Outdoor Rec. land etc. The comparison tables shows that the County has experienced a 19.9 percent increase in developed land over the past six years (131,964-110,097/110,097), with a majority of that expansion contained in the 2004-2006 time period. For the period of comparison the BEBR population estimates for the unincorporated area indicate an estimate in 2003 of 260,948 and an estimate in 2009 of 293,909 a 12.6 percent increase i(293,909-260,948J/260,948}. The increase in developed land was not supported hy a corresponding rate of population increase for the period of analysis. Clearly a negative consequence associated with the housing bubble of the past decade. Chart 2.1 on the following page illustrates the extent of developed, undeveloped and undevelopable land within the County's land inventory. ") j;,~'(istifJg l'. Anticipated lJevelopment Chart 2,1 The Extent of Developed, Vacant & Developable land, Vacant & Undevelopable land within Unincorporated Collier 2009 830,655 Acres ACRFS 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 o 354,852 Acres 131,964 Acres ... Developed land Vacant & Developable land Vacant & Undevelopable land In order to assess developed land uses in Collier County a comparison of ResidentiaL Commercial. Industrial and Institutional uses was conducted fur each or the County's 12 Planning Communities, comparing the table generated for the 2004 EAR against the 2011 EAR. This analysis is provided for in Table 2.3 and 2.4, and Chart 2.2 and 2.3. Table 2.3 land Use of Developed lands for Unincorporated Collier (Prepared in 2009) - Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres. North Naples 6,796 1,518 395 432 9,141 Central Naples 2,797 495 406 68 3,766 East Naples 2,251 443 56 83 2,833 South Naples 3,246 369 9 164 3,788 Golden Gate 5,084 186 9 152 5,431 , Marco 538 24 9 86 657 ' Urban Estates 9,018 360 9 219 9,606 ! Immokalee 1,838 364 147 185 2,534 Rural Estates 23,165 81 692 91 24,029 ! I Corkscrew 1,765 219 52 1,069 3,105 i Royal Fakapalm 3,706 1,781 297 161 5,945 i I Big Cypress 556 72 0 41 669 i " j Existing v. Anticipated Development -'~-"--"""_.~--'-'--_.'-'-' ! Total --~ 50,760 . . __ S,9~2L 2,081 2,751 71,50<1 (Source. 2009 P~cpe!"t'! ,Appraiser Reccfcs ~, CoiJier C0un~y GIS jata , Tatal excludes Gov~r:lmBnt, Golf Course and R.O-W Utility, Outdoor Ree iana e\c Table 2.4 land Use of Developed lands for Unincorporated Collier (Prepared in 2003) Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total I Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres' North Naples 6,338 1,148 390 495 8,371 Central Naples 2,397 468 429 84 3,3781 East Naples 2,190 433 53 121 2,797 I South Naples 2,883 431 7 135 3,456 Golden Gate 4,908 175 8 152 5,243 1 Marco =t= 376 21 9 86 492 Urban Estates 7,875 190 33 165 8,263 lmmokalee , 1,628 251 ---- ~~: I - 150 2,162 -~------ Rural Estates 16,843 32 5 17,438 Corkscrew 1,414 572 52 886 2,924 Royal Fakapalm 3,582 879 310 86 4,857 Big Cypress 635 49 0 34 718 Total 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399 60,099 (Source: 2003 Property Appraiser's Records & Collier County GIS data) . Total excludes Government, Golf Course and R~O-W, Utility, Outdoor Rec. land ete Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional 2003 51,069 4,649 _!,982 2,399 i 2009 60,760 5,912 2,081 2,7511 Change in Acres 9,691 1,263 99 3521 Percent Change 18.98% 27.17% 4.99% 14,67% , As noted within the analysis tllr the time period, based upon BEBR estimates. the unincorporated population tl)r the County increased by J 2.6 percent, where both the residential and commercial categories increased at a accelerated pace, the institution category was close to alignment with the population increase and the percent increase of industrial land use lagged signiticantly the population rate of increase. The outpacing of the residential and commercial development compared to the expansion of the population has a 4 Kyistinx r. ,1nticipuled Development direCl correlation ll) the surplus of }x}th land US~ (lHTUl"I\l\Jitil''i ..:\ fk'ri',.:n'':C(l uver the past t\\D y'-cars. tlw \_ \'iLin[', Chart 2,2 2003 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COLLIER Industriai 3.30% ~. Commercial ~ 7,74% institutional 3_999';) I Chart 2.3 2009 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COLLIER I d . I Institutional n ustrla 3 85% 2.91% . 0 Commercial ~ ~ 8.27% The following charts and maps depict the twelve Planning Communities within the County and the land use breakdowns for each of those Planning Communities 5 Existinx v. Anticipated Development (0 w I i ~ I I I I ., - " 2L ~ :tl! ~2~l!~~ ltI 'n ... ltI a.w I.l., UJ u...:.:: >, M7U~oU~ >.... ... E 0lJ:: ~&8EI:Q~ c. 'J) UJ f= Z :> :; :; o \) " z Z z :\ a. t-.:o mc, 'i"" N ~r-.,..... L- , '" 'Jl.4) -,} ~ ai! ;/l..e ':jiltllU.Gl::l. IUZ~o.m Z-l:"'Z .:::: e 41 Z..c. 0 "t:c.E;n-:;2 o G) 0 <tI 0 "' zuc"wu>:!: -,. ..:... "S ""- ~Nl"')v~l.O ~ C) (n, ,-. -'" "'-. 7 c.."" -..,. ,- <-f ~,....J Q. ^ r }-. -7 ~- ~,/ -- , --' ,r'.) I "-" , ...... , a.: l' : .... _J ~...,; ,-, i,~ ) , , '..-~ .... C~ .-..... / z ;: ';-:' - @ C.'.I',; " .'-."',............. ~"- . "':" .:-,:.........'.::::',:..'.... . ~'7 ,~ 3 It! o u i . " - €I :d\e-... '-*,:~--T-C ~r :.e-..~'_~"d. ~ '" .+. . co r~' ' , ; '\....._.1_. \, " u. o ~ u '" Ii! ~ u. o ~ - u Of tA~\CO G\l\..f o 6 l.~rj.\'ljng v, -JllliClpwed Ih~...'el(Jrmte!ll III -0 t: ra -J "'C QJ C- O QJ > QJ C QJ III :J -0 t: ra -J ~ o o N .~ g 6 o 0" " o o o. en n 0 2 co m '" co ro co N cO 2' en 0 ~ 0 ro 0 C') '" 6 N co co W en m co 0 n rl rl ~. u "6 C') ,...J..,._ LI J_- II 0 ~ E s ~ '" ~ 0 2 ~ .^ ~ ~ ~ 2 ill 2 ::' ill ill ill ill ro ~ ro ill Q Q 6. Q ;'0 ro t' ro l'J Q. Q > ro :,: v, ~ ;;; ro ro ro ro u co< ~ w 0 u, c Z Z Z Z ro '" E ill on W 0 :" E c "D -E ~ :" t a; ro (5 " ~ ro U " .D ro C 0 > '" :'5 l'J 0 w en ill Z 0 u a: ---- -~,,---- _."----~--~ --'-'- - - ..,,------_. 7 Existing v. A.nticipated Development o o o en' 'D q m co 5 0. m q co co N 0 ro rl m m' en Z v ill 0. m rl ro m co ~ Z co ~ '" N '" N' v ro w :; v N W co en 0. co m c co 0 m N w ro '" '" N' U Z ~,,- -5 v co co w C" en rl m 0 0. m m ~ N Z ro '" m .--<' '0' Z ._._-,,-,....-"-,-,..,-~, v ~ v ~ W u :i:. <t ~ U u <t ro <t ro c ~ ro 0 ro "' "' .~ w c ;3 E ill U ~ 0 c ~ u 0 ru c -" U co , . . . . -'-_..-,-,.- .. .-.-,.-.--.-+- _.._. ,-. _.. -~_.~ VI "'C c: III ...J "'C Qj C- O Qj :> Qj o Qj VI ::::> "'C c: III ...J m o o N ...,J al J ~ ~ ~ 0- >- U no di E S .^ w ~ "' " ~ ~ " 0- :r: ~ ru ,0 ~ u w ro ~ J m m ,~ " >- '" 0 '" ~ -~ - .. " co - -T ,-, :" r:0 '" :c , c - 0 n " , ," ;.,J '-'1 , ~ J, en ~ c~ rl 'c _c ~.i 0 0 "' 0 " ~ ,Y, ~ J:~ ~ ~ ?i 00 0 ." m ~. c5 - '0 o o "D- c .., ~ ~ c' W " m 2: ~ m 00 '" " ", 0 ", "c " "'. W rl U '" 0 <..:; " "., w " a.. m ,~ m ~O, 0 m rl '" N ~ Z w n. rl m. 0 m m '" " m rl Z ~ '" ,-.1' m ,~ ~ ill 00 ~ ~ ~ a. '" N ~ m c rn 00 '" '" W c'l U Z " 00 ,~ L ill " 0 '" ," a. ~ ~ rl m 0 m '" ~. \.) Z Z ~ ru ~ ~ :i u w w << U u << m << m 2 m m ii3 E c' ~ E ii3 " " '" , E ^ ,^ u 0 ru E u ~ . . . 'i o o o cD' o o o -T' , o o o N ...J . 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ^ "' ~ W ill ill ~ W " 0- Q. 0. 0- ~ rtJ '.9 m ro :? ro .m Z Z Z Z '" W L "' :0 u , T"; "0 , ro -2 ,~ '..U ~ 7 "' , 8 f:.:.\:iSlirJR r .-It!f1cipated [.lnvlopmelll VI Ql ";: o Cl Ql .... III U 5l ~ ::J .i: "C II) ;:) lij ~ E -;, g. ~ :g:C:u ::] ;S l:l) E ... s::: E 0 "- o :c: s::: u ~ g> 0:: c: c: .!!! c.. en o o N CD ex:> lO C\I C\I (J) lO ,..,. III (J) ~ (J) C') CD C') 0 ~- Ql r-- l!) C') ~ ~ lO ~. '- (J CD ~ ~ ~ <( I'-' "C Ql 15 C. .S! 0 ~ . Ql 0 > '" TI ,Q Ql . TI 2 ~ 0 C c 0 ro 0 e- ~ 'w li 0 TI . ~ 0. 0 :; C\I CD lO ex:> ~ 0 0 E -" 0 ~ (!) ex:> ~ (!) 0 . 0 0 0 x ro 0 "C ." ~ ~ C\I (J) ex:> . 0 0 0 ~ Ql -" C') ~ .2 ro C ~ . c. 0 .3 TI E . . 0 VI ,g ." 0 ~ . -0 Ql " 0 C > . Gi ro -~ '" 0 0 0 '- ~ " "- > (J ro 0 ." ~ . 'il> .~ Ql <( 0 '" .0 . . "C 0 0 0 ." Q; 0 ., 15 ~ c: 0 . TI U .,. 0 ;;; ::J 0 " S C 0 ~ . 0 ~ .0 <i . . ~ ." Q; E . .0 0 ~ E TI 15 ro U . 0 0 ex:> ~ 0 0 lO C') (J) lO ~ TI ." ~ > U ~ . . <i 0 .~ . 0 ex:> ex:> lO 0 ~ C\I C') 0 ~ 0 " Q; 0 > '" 0 0 ro '" (J) CD ~ CD lO ~- ~ lO C\I S N 0 ,,; ro ro ~ 0 TI " ~ (J) ~ ~ ~ ~ C\I S 0. " '" ~ TI E .Q ~ ~ N ~ 0 0 TI ~ -" ro " 0 " III ~ ~ -" ro III ~ .3 C 0 . 0 TI U .... ." ro S "' ;;; . Q; U " 0 0. 0 (J '0 ro '" 0 1ii ~ 0 ,,; I- <( '" > . ~ ~ .. 2 ro E ro > '0 ~ . . ~ -" ,,; ~ ~ TI '0. TI . TI 0 0 0 0 0 '" TI . 0 0 0 -" .~ ~ 0 "- " ." ~ '0 E . -" ~ . 0 ,,; 0 > . . u ro '0 0 " '0 ;; TI 0 TI 0 . en 0 ~ ;i ro 0 . ~ -~ TI ~ U '" 0. " 0 6 ~ .0 TI 0 0 E -" '- . 0 .. ~ 8 TI 0 -" > . iO 0 0 0 . TI . . U ~ TI TI 0 VI iO " TI . ~ U ::] . 0 0 .0 ~ 0 TI E "C 'ii .... .... Ql 0 0. .. u iO . ~ 0 c: Ql III c: c: 'ii VI 0 > .0 . ~ 0 ;; fi VI III '(j c: Ql Ql '- Ql .. . iO 0. 0 ~ 0 ~ C '- > ." 0 III ::J :;:: III 0 E E ::] ::] c: . 0 . 0 () .. ;S 15 -' c: '- ,g .... .!!! TI 0 0. .. ;;; Ql Ql ';: :;:: c: c: :i 0 ~ ro ~ 0 > C > '0 C E .... ::] '- ro '- U Gi .. . . .~ . ~ .3 TI 0 "C III .... Ql Ql- (J .3 > 0 E . E E ::] :;:: . .... (J . 0 E . ~ E VI > 0 > " ';: 5 ." ." TI 0 01 (5 .!!! " g <i . TI 0 . Ql 0 "C VI 0 Cl 0 " > 0 e. ~ E 0 c)!. " ~ 0 0 <3 a::: U c: C) u <( C) :!: '" '" .. " - <( <( :2 0 0 1:.0 9 Existing v. Anticipated Development >- I- Z :::> ::2; ::2; ::2; o u c.9 z z z <( -' 0.. ~. ' ....{ :: d~ 10-0- ~) 0\ ')" \. .~ (jj w -' 0.. <( Z I I- a:: o z z o z <( -' o W 0- o -' :..L.J > w C Z :::> ~ ,~ z D r- 1 . r.>.... I I I <: , , I L 1=1: 0::- O~ Z::1! z::1! -0 Ou Z <(el ..JZ 02: WZ 0.<( O..J ..Ja. Wen >W W..J 00. Z<( ::::lZ I' N -;;;- . ':1(1) ......f&):~:~ ,_W,.......N fj"; .< :10 'I~ '0 1m l:i[:i :' ':to " z ~ L,b [~~~, ~ *~~~2 ~'~ ~ ! ; <:;;_ N I I ;; in " ~ , o co 1 "0 co " ". u C u . oc ~ ;; c. ~ '" ~ t: . ~ o 0. m o o N ~ " o '" 'C c: Cl> C> Cl> ' ..J a. a, .: ~ ~ ~ 1-' !W IUl - - ~.!.! CD :, .. U'-,.: '10 c: I:;J'..!!I'S .z .I'~ - .'[:5' ... -101'" I,: 1i ':I =: ! ID i~'. ;c:1.s . :~~ ~ ; J!lk-..: .. 1- ...~~~-,-"",~. ~.. ...........,.#1 ." ....31 I 'j" ,.:, l'~!.1 ..,.-,-- '" ~ ~.N Gel N01S8NIAI'l .. .. / . ..t Q 0: I j " :Ll co '. .... .;; i .~'" ':J .. . .. .. . '. "'" S'i)~ Q)o "'4 1 . . &.. ~ ,J,I.,,- )'iq.. .'~ L ~. ''" zi 0\ . ,~O . ,,) (J(J J'188'JciNV^~' o '" I.' U > &,~ ~-l I " OJ 1 . " r-"-~ ___ ___ - I- I. oi. --- ~ f-No~~n~-l~jQl~~I'V - n:: ' w F"J"_ ~i). ~." . .,_,ii! r . .> )~.4 r'. ::'~ ~.\&; __ ______'-' ; . . ^ rr. ~~- r---- ~ i. .. I . ----.-. 0: )III{..... ..j....:. .. .. . .. . +.. I. ..' -~ . ~-~.!O""::<"~.-I.-~-r-~' _.~--- . j ...; _ .' " _.._ _ / _ N l~i-I~'VltN~~I. U"._______...!'.._ ~- . . . !. ~ _ . .. i i::~:.; ! ,-eX' . /-- ;r:~-:- .:-_..,.--w-..i__.I ;1 .' I ffi "GuLl: S'~ORE. OR' ~Cl N01S8NIAIlT' HI .. '. , . .~ t- ._'-~:,;- j ill Of ~E~\CO G\l\..f ~ '-', -Jm!- iil \"i./u/il!,em U) -'" :;; N co " w t , <Jo I <(0 '-' 6~ - E ~ ~ ~ Zw , ~ 4_ ~ >" u " ~ T~ [ ~ ~ " H . wo.: 1 0 rll'" J I ~ (jO ~~ -. 0 5 ~g II eD ,,~ I , .< I 0 ""IT: ,!,!.L , 0?s 0 i:I .. ( , I' , z III l!! u <( 'tl Gl Q. o 'ii > Gl o III Gl '0: o Cl S lU U 3: ~ ~ 'i:: 'tl :l ::s C - e j Ii e ~~ 0 'C - (,) ::J l!! OJ E ... l:: E l:: '- o ~ l:: III U Iii J!ll!! g' it~~ C C lU c:: en Q Q N I'-LO<OlXl 0)0)0<0 I'-'<t'<t N 'tl Gl Q. o 'ii > Gl 'tl C ~ NNI'-LO ~LO(,,)N"'" ~LO .!!! ~ U)~ l!! ~ u ~ c( ~ o ~ w w ..!l 'tl Gl C III lU~ ...J 0)1'-(")(") '<tN(")lXl (")LO'<t (") lU.!!! iii :W~Ci:S I:: Q)"i::W 'tl._Gl E Ui .a E::J;l gj o'tl III O::Uc.s <0 LON (")OLO '<t,(") ..... 00<0 N I'- ..... ..... 0<0 LOlXll~ <0 NLOON N'r"~V .....- ~ III _ _ ::J C C GlO G) CLI ~ ~ CD ECE ::J::JC C~S::=OJ!!~ ..~.. ::JU- Gl~Gl>'i:'.~...8..... >. m'--rn!io-\ 05 0.<: ClO,-~ Cl.!!.Cl1l<(Cl:E..... ~- ~ ~ ~ c:: ~ .9 f?- a. => E a. ~ C, ~ ~ ~ .E => '0 '" ~ => m u => "i: 01 '" ~ ttI -iii "C ~ .0 :g 'S: 0 ~ "ii) c 0 u C ~ .:g c.;i Q) -g ~ a; ~ to U Q) -g il ~ u i; ~~ja;(9 1:' -C :::I m ~ 0 .3 c ~ B ~ '5 'C m rJi '" > ~ ctl 'O..lJ!: ~ Q)!I! ~ w '" ~ b. ~ '0 E ~ m 8"1:: .~ III ~ a. -g 0 E ~ .!. o u -c ~ a. o a; > ~ "0 'iii 2 '3 u .~ 'l i::i (/) ~ ~ a.-g o u ~ .5 ~-o ~ ~ => a. ~ ~ .a iii '3 "0 ~ u tn.!!! 0( :;; " ~ m ~ o ~ ~ .g iij .i (I) "0; '0 ~ j :5 ~ .Q 'iii ~ ~ m ~ 8 uim a. u E.!2 ~ 5 w ~ .em ~ en E ~ ~ ~ '0 '0 ~ ~ J!!~ ~ ~ 1ii -g ~ U III .5 -8 C :J ,Q u'iii .5 ~ -0 5l ~ ~ ~ 0 a; 0 > C ~ ~ -g E => E u ~ m > ~ c3 ~ o w C ~ ~ 'ti > ~ e .5 E E .- ~ "9. OJ '" '0 ~ ~ a; ~ " ~ ~ .c -g '0 u ~ ~ ~ .- :> en fij ~ e u w III ClI ~ -g ts ~ ~ ~ -g .8 o a. ~ ~ .E iii c: ~ m 5l ~ '5. 3 3 ~ ~ "C .c_ u ~ w c: m '0 (i) " 0 ~ -5 ~ g. III C ~ :3 .!!! ell"C '0 '0 => Q) >. 13 ~ -g ": o iii Ql >- m .c $ :2 '0 n:I .::: c 'f: 0 co a. m E Q) 5l E '0 0 ~ -5e-~ .S ~ C> II Existing v. Anticipated Development >- ;..." ~ ~ "" :1 z ~\ 15 ::l :2: .. ..~ :2: ,'j~=. :2: d 0 u C9 z z z <( --' (L (f) ill --' (L <( Z --' <( a:: ~ z w u z 0 z <( --' 0 ill (L 0 --' ill > W 0 Z ~ ~ LL 0 Z 0 I- <( U c: -1>- <(I- a:::_ I-Z Z::l W:z U:z Zo cU zCl <(Z -1- Z CZ w<( D..-I OD.. -100 Ww >-1 wD.. C<( Zz ::l o '" '" CO o 0' C" <; '- S]~_~ ~] ii ~ E ~ (J ~ ~ ~ 015 &8:E~ ~NNt--..,., bl!)<"lt'\l..... 4 ~ t-r ..,,',.... ., .. ",.,- . '~-~~<>''''. "... :-'r~';.~7.: _ ,__."f '1' . \_.:.,:;.~:. ..":: ,_, :c:i....:c.. }::;/:-:; t.;:.).,::;;-:',,:' "..)"::_;'-~\.'a<,;'i;-",/.,).: .J"", ., ",'';1, . 'j7:';" ~(:,:~r;~:::111~)":' .. . l' .1_ . .,..~ '. ) . n , CA r '" '" . . . .' H < ,1 i~ 'U 1<( I~ ,"" ,W I~ ,Z I:::> ! 'IW I", '::> , '10 IZ 1,< I''''' NN""'U') U')MN_ '" CDaJ co ;;~"iS ill'!:; 'CEli..;! 'i e :::I:: "'8"" a:: .E C 1 ...... , ill j ii) i3 i> o , o U '" .!!! :;: N "~ ~ . ~ "0 u ~ <~ . 6tz " J E ~ E , , Zw c: 0 . ~ <~ .. D 0 ,~ Cl li. li. " 1 TO . ~< .. li. 0 wc 0 ~ 0 -' . .. .. rnw " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o C. , ~ z~ .. ~ _z ~ ~ " " " " Co c_ II <~ ~o 0 ~w a~ en 0 :! '0 u .. . ~ ~ o . "' . . "i! 0. !: If ,0. ii ..E " 110) il g I! N , IV II ~ ._1 0 e o I _~ I. :~.~I 1,--, I ;~~ ,. ,,.4., , . . .. s""o~ N01S8NIAIl ". N 0" 3113l000;) ~ "',f-", ,,'" f .:Ii j'" #__.:a; -- , ;sm AIRPORT PULL\~.G RD N'::"-Ii ., " -~ /$ .. o 0: o is ~ S 0" DNlllnd l"Od"'V ~ " ],,;ll- ~ I -r Z I .__._-----_..~ ";p.,.M\!S,h\ 1 Rt->..\L , ~, -.:ti ,/,-,';,;, i !7;'I~i/'I':!t',i I h'\ t'/!!Jil!ll'lIf Ul Gl ... o c:( "C Gl Q. o 'ii > Gl C Ul Gl .;: o CI S III o 3: ~ ::::l ... "C III 5 ; Q) e ...J-e .a-~O 'C::C: (.) ::::I .... Ol ~ ~ .5 o Ll.I c:: o lii s 2! ~ tt~~ c C III ii: en o o N "C Gl Q. c o Ul.2 a; f-; > 0 ~ Gl c:( .. "C c c 8 ::::l :: .!! "C Gl C Ul Ill::::l ...J ~ LO "!. N ''')(0 l"'l ;LOCO COO>N-.t /nO O'lf"'""........ -g L{) 'If"'"" 'If"'"" .!! O>NCOr--- LOLOCDLO r---LO N N III III Ill.- C :;:; ~"ii 0 r:::Cb.~.. Gl E - ::::I "C._ Ul_ E::::I;: :ll o"C Ul a:: 0 -= c CDO-.t co ~ ~ 0> ~ Ol"'ll"'l ~_ CDLO -.t~ ""' ~- .- -.t CD l"'lr---~_ OCOCDLO "l;f"'If"'""V'lf"'"" ~ ~ Ul _........ G> ::::s 5; 5; E l!! g E C E ::::1::::1 C CO C = o..!!! ...~~ ~oa; ~:>-c'i:"'(,) QCo!cno.!! O!O~C:(O:!i -t:i In ~ ~ i:i 0. 1:) ~ 0 ~ a. Q) 13 o >.!; q; ~ > "0 "0 ~ C ~ "0 ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ ~ .a .a ijj -'3'3"0 "'\ U _2 (,) '" "I:: ~.~ ~<(::E 13 Existing v. Anticipated Development -0 c .. ~ o " "0.2 "0 C m ~ "0 C .!! c g ;; ~ ~ ~ c 8 ~ ';;; ~ :; c o .. " ~ E ~ -g o C ""CJ o.."E lI.l .~ t ~ ~ Q; o _ "0 m c ~ ~ ~ .0 -g (5 13 c .S ~ 0> i ~ e o .. .:g ~ ~ s co c: "C Q .2 8.. Q; 1ii ~ iii 2: > 19 CD G.I"iS.. .. "0 .. ceo ~~~ l:: I'll '0 u; ~ ~ ~ f ~ 1! CI:l -c "0 "0 ~ ~ ~ 13 ~ -g .s o 1ii ~ ~fIl..c jg;S 15 C'll _ c of: 0 lI.l 0. .. E lI.l ~ E -g ~ ~ 13 ~ 0 Co.C9 i . i'. - rL /" / I 'f . "'t r :"j(4---- I If ~J'U;); ~ ~ F~ II"'~ - r-- r _',- .-/~ t )1 ) "' ~II U -lllI!:':' J :n-1""r.r.."r'" /~'-----_ /""' / ") \., ~ ..1./1 ~--0 '^'- ---1 '. ~< ]' Ii-I',> ' , \,It . ~. ' - t c. ~"':"\",,,-,_ "__. ./~/=~---........\" \ :.:..~ c,'I--\::;:T S C /) __:---:=' ~__ ~ .-,.0 //__--=-.:::::. ~ \ ','" -:.~......'(' Jl'\\~' \ ,/"' ~'___,_____,= c~- , / \ .-"" -~ o z <{ ..J o W D- o w > w o Z ::J LL o z o ,- <1: (.,) i'..... ~ 0 0:: - 0 ,.' is - ",; & 0:: >- I- Z ::J ~ ~ ~ o o (9 z z z <{ ..J 0... (/) W ..J 0... <{ Z l- (/) <{ w z ;..... ~i :\ '00:"1 rj; ... 2~' \'S c IJ. iii a COCN"" -'" 0 >- .(fJ 00.....,... = ~~~jp~ IW It).... ..... 0 1-1- 10: u l/)- rnc~,o ,t) ~ <(z ~ -~ ~g ,,,,; '0 w::l u ~8~~ I~ u z:E UJ[g~~;! .. . -:E b It) ~ ~ ~ " cO ~ :; c: luJ " .. zo . '" '" u <(el Ii ~ .. ! ...Jz . ..J " .~ Q. . 0 c- to ~ " wZ 0- :Ii , .:J 0- a.Z <( 0<( ~ ...J...J 11ll! -- iii !i wa. I:').!!.!! _ C e >l/) 1'0 c: ~ -! .g "- ww ~ !Iz -3 ~ TO = 0 c...J 0 N za. ":) Ui " ;; ;,; ::l<( II ~ 8 ~ .E ~ z , 0 ~ Vi ~ ::;; N ~ . . , i I 0 , ~ E ~ , . E u " ~ u u 1> . . ! ! ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ III if> ow Uo ~u 0~ Zw ~, "c I" c< w" mw dO ZW _z "0 "- ~c ~~ '" ww (9~ en o o ./ , . :v'" ,,<<' , :'~~;~ o (f) (f) ",; :2 o I ~::,<u :i~ c o > -J III (f) '> ",; o " . (', l. ..... *"" .. .... [ s alJ'8~lllnd HJO&lI\1._ ~.., . . ~-, . .....]" ',. ' . ., , t .- Ii '"" I".. I ~' ~a 3~6H~1t8 :',,~, . ~ '~I 1.._, .. z / ~- 1\'\'c!(/f1!?h'//r III CIl "t: o Cl CIl .... ra U :Jl ~ ::l "c: " II) :::l ~ ~ E: ;, g. E: ~:i!:8 :J .s OJ E :::l c:: E 0"- o CI) c:: u ~ Cl n- c: _ c: c: ra 0- m o o N <0 en en ~ r-- 0 r-- ~ III ~ <0 <0 <0 C') <0 CIl N C') ~ ~ ~ r-- ... 0 C') N ~ e:( " CIl 15 Co C 0 ~ Gi 0 > W "0 .E CIl ~ "0 2 w C C c 0 . 0 E" w 'w a 0 "0 . 0. C :; r-- <0 ~ ~ 0 0 L() ~ E -" 0 L() L() r-- L() ~ ~ 0> C C . 0 " 'C N ~ C') C') r-- ~ 0 w C - - l' $! ~ C CIl -" ~ ~ ~ ~ Co C .3 "0 ~ E . 0 III .2 "S 0 0 . -0 ~ OJ u 0 C > ~ Gi .~ 0> 0 e C ~ C U 0. E > 0 . "0 . iD . S " CIl e:( 0 0> D " C C C "0 1D ., 15 ~ c: 0 0 ~ "0 U '", C ro ::l u -s c c 0 ~ l' . 0 D U ~ . .!! "0 1D E . D C ~ C "0 15 . <5 " 0 "0 ~ > "5 c C') L() 0 L() en co r-- 0 N ~ "0 ~ . w ~ 0 .S 0 N ~ C') co L() ~ C') ~ ~ c a <9 > '" 0 c . ~ L() L() L() en L() L() ~ L() ~ N 0 '" .. . .c -s w "0 0. ~ U 0 M ~ ~ N ~ -'" "0 -s E w ~ ~ t<- .. c 0 . "0 U '" " c III .3 ~ ~ '" . ra ~ c w ~ C "0 U "S ro ro ~ 1D .... u u "5 "' 0 0. 0 0 '0 . '" w u; ~ 0 '" l- e:( 0> > w :0 ~ 1D ]i . - E l' > w 0 ~ ~ . '6. "0 w '" '" ~ W "0 W "0 C C C .~ ., "0 ~ 8 0 0 -" is. ~ c "- .c " -" W "0 '" E . w C 0 > w ~ u . 0 w u 'C ;; "0 C 0 . Uj al w w " . 0 .c .~ "0 ~ U ,,; 0. U C ~ .S 0 w E '" W "0 .. W W C c 0 "0 -" > w u -g w 0 .2 . "0 . "5 ro "0 "0 0 III "0 0. "0 ~ ~ "5 :J . 0 0 .S ~ C "0 E " iii .... .... CIl 0 0. 0; "5 -0 ~ ~ 0 CIl iii iii c: c: iii 0 > .S w 0 ;; ~ c: l!! CIl <D . . c ra III 'u c: CIl '2 CIl ... > "0 "0 0. 0 ~ w .c ::l :0:; ra 0 E E :J :J c: ~ c ~ 0 () 0; ;s 15 ...J c: ... ~ ~ .!l! "0 0 0. 0; ro CD "a: :0:; c: c: 0 ~ 0 > c > " c CIl E .... . :J Gi l' l' 0; ~ . .~ . :J ... ~ ... U "0 E w E " III .... CIl ~'" 0 .3 .3 > c . "iij E :J . ~ 0 "S w 0 c w w E :0:; > 0 "t: "!!! "S "0 " "0 0 . o.l! u 0 CIl 0 " III 0 c Cl 0 ~ 0 " u U > 0 0. > 0 0 w 0 "5 " 0 a:: u c: c: C> .!1. C)! e:( C> :i: '" 0> ~ ~ <9 c "<9 <( <( 15 Etisting v. Anticipated Development >- f-- ;,;.... < I"ij't .:1 0~ .( .~ 8'. .) Z ::J 2 2 2 o () C.9 Z Z Z <{ -' 0- CfJ W 0- <{ Z J: I- ::J . 0 CfJ Z o z <( -' "", ~~ o w 0- o ,~~;\ji,j\'2,N,i \" w > w o z ::J '- c. z .J '- ~'-, '-, :r:>- f--!:: :::>z 0:::> (/)::!E z::!E 0 -0 Ou Zt:) ::5~ oz wz a.<:( O...J ...Ja. w(/) >w w...J oa. z<:( :::>z " IUH Y,;:: i . ~ i "': ~~.i_ ""P I - . . ;,:~Vf;~ I,. I :,....t .L, I i c:::r~Si-:~L, '~\-.,(: i)~! li:':'"i 11"-\._--=::':'.. ,--......-'---"--~ ~O^18 Cl31110:> \ :;,^ ,.. iCO .y-;::. 1'0''' U),U) (") 'IW N~ a: . :iO ,... ,< 10 IW 'll. 10 '.... 'w l> Iw :IQ 1% ,'::> Vi " ~ ~ o o ~ "0 o '" . l' o u w << 0; . " 0. ~ "" f' w ~ o Ii: m o o N j~-G 'i l;j ! 'u 'i~ ;' C:'''"'."E::_ 10 IJ:~ 101= -.,z:5! ;:t:;:: 1< ctJ '''0;0 ~j-' :. B.= -=_ " u , o ~ , , ~ ~- ... ~"-" AIr. f],D " ., '0 '0 "~j.:lio ~, :.r:o w: .-'::i " z. C3J ~, ii. .} .,i i;" ,;~ \ I '/:n,~/ ;' " i ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~; , "0 ~ " - c: l " v . Ii 0 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 I i " ,~" l i ..J C. , ~ 5 , '" ~o -- 0 " , I I :;: I f < ',..... ,,) ;I. ". .~:; ,. I , I ",,{) z( ,r-' ~ "'-<LilA' t <" z '-> . <;,"/ if. . ,,' 1;'1 ('iilflfl.-en! 1111/; ij'U/l.( , ~ '" Q) ~ N " ;.L u Un ~~ Zw <" 'e lrt f-- ~ LUQ mw o U(j) ~L "0 ~~ 2 a:: IfJ,l-' (5 ~, '" o o '" "'(?" :5,V ,-"" ,~ (j \ , <:J.. , ..~,"-', " s ./ --."".' ,,-~ '" ~;:.-) \;./ \' ,-~ -"/::)r-'> , , \ -'-' , ~ '-v J~?/ i // fi , , \ //'/ -~,;;~:;/ / / 1/1 l!! u <( "C Gl C. o Gi > Gl o 1/1 Gl ";: o Cl S III o :Jl ~ ::l 'i: "C ...CIl :::. C e j III ~ ~ C) ~ .- c: 0 c CIl ~ ~ ~ EO.... oC)C: 1/1 o Iii S l!! ~ it~~ c C III ii: Ql o o N -.rCOO)N 0000 LO o~ ~ ..0 "C Gl C. o Gi > Gl "C C :J -.rt--OCO -!l (") 0) (") e 00 ~ .!! e 1/1 0 e~ u ~ <( ! o u . . .l! "C Gl C 1/1 j::l t--(")O)oo ~oo 00 0)(") ~ LO .... -Ill iii iii c ,- C Gl :;::l l:!iii 0 E cQ)"L:;is:: GlE....=.. :5! E 1/1 .... Gl g:o';:;~ O::Oc..5Cl 00(")0) NLOO -.rco o)Ot--~ o 00 ~ ~ f,-- co Nt--(")LO~ -.r t--(")LOo) ('I")T"""~"""" fxi 1/1 .... = C GlO CD 1!~CD 'E' E = = c :is:: ~o.! ~i 1:l0Gi~ ~~j~';,~3 8Cl~<(Cl:E- ~ ~- ~ " c:: ~ .S! c. C. :; E 0. ~ ril " ~ ~ .E .3 ~ 1i ~ .~ ~ (lJ "ij "'C ~ ..c ~ ":; '0 3: "iii c 0 U "E ~ ~ <,) Q) -g ~ (jj ~ (lJ u ~ ~ -g ~ rJ 0 ~~jIDC9 ~ -g 5 ~ s .a 'E ~ a ~ S 'e m C) > [l :'O..lr::_m "0 . C ~ "" :;! .~ ~ o E . ~ 8.E; .~ ~ :f 0. C 0 E !2 .!. 8 'd III " " i::.i c..-g g{ 0 u o j .~ ~ -8 -1:i " c " "0 " 0. ~ ~ ~ .a .a ii "3 "3 "C U U U "I:: L.. rn Jf ~ ~ 17 Existing v. Anficinafed D I r eVe opment , "0 c ~ . o ~ ~ .g ai .i eIl'ii) "0 . j f; c .Q <;; ~ " ~ c 8 uim 0. U E .Q m ~ ~ 0 ~ " .cS e II) m E ~ .; " "0 "0 C " ~~ " . Ui -g ~ 13 /J) .!; -8 i::: ::I .9 U lii .5 ~ -1:i Q) " :!! g- 0 ;:;0 > "E " " -g E " E rJ ~ ~ 0 ::Eel c o J!l c . ~ ti > . o c is. 'E .~ iii "? Q) '" "0 m c ;:; . ~ . . .c -g "0 13 c c . .- > C) ; ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi m ..-- ~ ~ .8 o 0. . ~..Q rJi 2: ~ iti ~ -8 "0.. 5 5 ~ ~ "'C .c_ o c ~ c: m (5 i:i5 "'C 0 . -fi ~ g. In C Gi ~ J!! i)-g "0 "0 1l ~ ~.5 ~ " o rn Iii >- 0 .c mE i5 m - C .~ '0 Q) 0. ~ E III ~ E -g e. ~ 13 " 0 .5 a. (!) >- ~,. f- .....1 ):. ;:: z d :J :ii ~ ." :ii .~4::/ 0 :ii 0 () (9 z z z <( -I CL W f- <( (9 z w 0 -I 0 (9 z o z <( -I o w n.. o -I W > W o Z :J l.L o z o <l.: (-~, r. , .J in <5 Z ~ ....0 '" "" ~-!!i '" 0> '" 0 .. lfa , w>- o ,1Il '0 " co - 0 01- ~ ~ ~ Q L> ..J- . ~ ~ 15 ~ OZ u . &8 ~ ,<C <; C)~ "' ~~ . I~ L> ~ ro_ o .. Z~ < . t, ." -0 " Ou luJ u . Z '" <(C) Ii :;; ..JZ . 02: "E I::> " Wz " '" 0..<( ~ O..J . ..JD.. I~ " Ww COIU m 0 <l: >1- I::> _'_ _ c ~ w<( !I~ c ~ co 0 0 ., ~'C;:; 0 OC) 'tl iiiE N Z '<C ;;; E~::: 0; ::> 1...1 ., o'tl .. e a: () c: c: , ... 0 !!! .....- - - - ~ - -- . e- x w o '" UJ l'J o '" UJ z n: s O^ l8 N1;t80'l .. -v 1:zi\\,N? - --a-' -.--- -- - .--.------. -1 =111 o > ~ OJ Z w w no l'J - -- .. 1"1 - - - - --....- - - - ... -. I GA 18 ~3Ill0;) {~ "\. "'0> y'", o , 1-~-\f; '.~"' O2 00 , '\ , !l......... GA18 If,N8~lf8 Ifmlfs .. ~ "" - ......- . - .....-- '" .9! ::;; N "~ ~o <0 l' .. , (j~ " .. Zw I ~ ~ ~ <~ 'tl " rf- E ~ I" c: 0 ~ f-< '" U " w" C1 ~ 0 ~ 0 row " . ~ ~D '" ~ 0 t ! 0 0 ZW ..J I .. ~ _Z " f ~ "0 C- o , ~ ~f=: III ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ," ::E ~ " III ww '" G~ 0 .. .. , r" - I II ,. --I ('. _..::::1 .\ ';n/lCi;;ufcJ /)~1't 'j'i/)!7ic'Ji! o .. . GA18 \l0J1fmN8 1f1.NlfS I .' . J .... -.. ~ o > ~ on if) > <( o z I _...1 III Gl ';: o 01 Gl ... ClI o lJl ~ ::l 'S "C :;) lij E ..J 0 E ~~O 'c Iii () ~ :!!E 01 g .s o c: III o 1;.f! ~ g' a:~:t 'c C ClI a: a> o o N III ~ u <C "C Gl c.. o a; > Gl o <Xl'<t0><D C')N <Xl 10 IO<XlOC') .10 0> -g <Xl .!! ri "C Gl c.. 0 o en ~ "i ! ca > U ~ Gl <C = "C g C " ::l ~ .!! C')NO> O>C') 10 "C Gl C III ClI::l ..J - ClI ClI ClI ,- C ;~cao t: Q)"i:;: ~ EUi.a 'iij E ~:;: GlO"C1Il c::oCC 0> t- O> C') OON '<t <D o 0 IO~ j,- ~ <Xl 10 t- ~ cD N t- '<t N ~ '0 o m '0 . ~:;;_. ~ ~ ~ 1! " "S u '0 0> m . '0 o -'" ,....00('. <Xl~ N ~L() V_ ~ In i:i .......... ::J ~ -- - Q)O 0 ii_a; f!~Q) ~ EgE ~~r:: -1! c"'c =:o..!l!..J Cii~ Q;>;:-.~~B~ i >= CD....-IIl~ ~ Ol:O-SQ)O._~.g Cl].Cl~<CCl==~ :it ~ ~ Vi . g ~ a ;:J: E " . ci ~ ~ ~ S .3 -g "S . " ~ .~ ~ ttl 'm g> .0 ";;: "5 -05 c u ~ S .0 " - 0; ~ 6 a; ~ o 5 ~ 0 . '0 "0 S o 0 ~~ rJ "5 m Vi > . '0 ~ . -'" .~ 06 5. ~ 15 E G.l ~ 8 .i: .~ -2 :i 0. C 6 E !!! ~ o u -i; o . . o '- ~ .g iij .s- tIJ "00 '0 . ~ :; o o 0 .Q If) ro c ~ . . E (/) (!) U o > . 000 o o.."E -g .s Q) ~ ~ Q) o m ~ ~ ~ m E . .0 o '0 ~ " > <3 d 0 .S Q) C> c m " . '0 o -'" o o ij ~ . . o o u . u o u; a; ~ ,,'0 o ~ Q) (3 > .S ~ i::i o . ~ " ~ ~ .2 11; "S '0 " " OJ .~ <( :;; oom " u E Q ~ (; . . .em ~ iii m E ~ Vi . "0 '0 o . !!! ~ . . ;; '0 m ~ 3: U ui w .S u ~ i:' ~ :J .Q (3 ro U .S ~ ~ i:i Q) 3: . . 0 " 0 ~ 08 Q) a> ro [j ~ .~ -g E 0- ~ E . g ~ -g ~ c3 g 19 Existing v. Anticipated Development "0 o . > en ~ e . '" 5 N m '0 0 ~Q) ~ l/1 > ]j lD "0.. '0 . o 0 " ~ -g (lj m "6 '0 0 . ~ " u o . . . > . . "0 '0 ~ ~u '0 " ~ ~ . ~ ;S 0 '0 ~ . E ~ 0 ~ ill 5 ~ "co >- I- ~lJ ~I s) O} ~; ~( ,S z => :2 :2 = .<= o u 19 Z Z Z <( ~ D- O U 0:: <( :2 z o z <( o W D- O ~ lJ.J > w ~ ~ z => ~ o z "~' ,- '-"- i 1.- ... ( ) I I~" ~~-, I I L__ o U l:t: <(>- :2'1:: ZZ _:J 0:2' Z:2' <(0 ...Ju 0" Wz Q.- OZ ...JZ W<( >...J WQ. o Z :J 'H /:;:; m Uti U-, 'L .~, ~ :r I I ,.'} -0' -,"'~ .~1l --.:1. 1:" '1(fJ IJ)ODO ~ !'IW II) 00 II~ M !IC 'IW '''- ,10 '1-' I,~ 10 ::jZ IP 'iw !W) - <<i "i - 1Il._ c:: :;;... "; f:! ii 0 I!.I~ ~ I ~ ~ 1:)1ii!=;:: ~ ii, :8~E " \'\. '-'~ '\ :-~, '\-', ~-;f:, \ ~'" ~:.-...~ .'1;-;'~ ': c 'c~' ~ (~ :.~ ri ,,>:.) ~-r'~! -~':: ',"-'I -'\" 0\ fy'--':'::i: ' \~,-~ Si:. . " / .'. _ " '-,,' \./''':'1''' - ,) ,. ;};-~ z. f.. _ ~'jf .'~l,; ,a;;::!.' =.' "'....' ,:,~?:~ , ':llol.'\I'\"\~~':'_i ~ ','~:::;0~'~':,l_~'::__!~~1 ~qr3'1~'g.;_a~~gJ~~O/\i8 ~31110J ~ ~+"':2;; - . >'"ij '~- gi In ~ ~ ~ o u ~ "0 G ," . w " u , " . " " 0. ~ '" ~ t . ~ e ~ m o o N ~ 2 o In /:.t ~ J -~ --\, ) "1 (...!.' ..Ai)'! ,. . \-. ' , ~. , j.\CO f~t:: ~fO GU X!;j -'I; .v, ,j{ \ ',? I~. ,. ~ ~ i ,-'~\'"~<:, - ->. _..If:~~it- \ w(;"',,f:. . --" '...- ~~)~ j;;:." 'ill ~~~?jI./~-.. c ~ ~- '". ~ g~f:i-.:-r""'~ " ! H; ~ N u~ u;J.i.~~~' ~ ~ g- g- '. 00 '~- . ~ ~ !c ~ 0; ~ f -- ~~.; .~,:' :: ~ ~ ~ ! LO & Q:)~ <, l-" ~ t ~ 'I.'~: Ilj ;f~~~~~" ,.~ ~~:~ ~.4 <<X'" ~ ^ ~ . "I!j V-&'V'-'I~ ..() ~'l.il'::" :"6^-',;~y ',i... . ~ y..:... '.-.. 'f'\.~ /.... --Ii .... 'L,' , ~ .,,< <", :y ) ~~ ..J7 ~'" ~ . .f'~~:,f~(~ ..~ \' ~,r1~-~ '5--s "'J , \" ", ~i...}.."'L ('-.... i/;:Y, ';" ~,,-~ ~' , ;,1'., ~ ' t r::\~~:;~,,~ I JA!."~ ." '(d.l' '\.'. '~, ?;. '0 C " '" " -' 0. '" :;0 .~. "" .t/..... '.;11..., ~1 ., ., .:>,-( , / >,,/" ./1 I z~ IllliCijll!lCl/ Ih ',c'!njl!1h'!71 1Il GI ';: o CI GI - III o 5l ~ ::::l ... "0 U) S i .s e ..J-l!!e ~,\,! 0 'c ... 0 ::l t: tIl ~ ~.5 oSt: o fi ~ a: c c III ii: en o o N co 0 C1l C1l l"- ll) co ~ 1Il ~ co ~ V N (Y') GI 0 (Y') N co ~ ~ ~ .. oi N N U ~ < ~ "0 . GI C- '0 C 0 m Gi ~ 0 ~ > .. " .E GI ~ " .!i m C C " 0 m .9 e- m .;;; 0. ~ -g " 0 0 0 I"- 0 (Y') i""" E 0. .!!! ;; ~ c, .. (Y') (Y') ll) ~ ~ ~ C C " CO 0 ll) m .9 0 "0 ~ " ~ m C !! .E ~ 'E GI .!! N ~ C- ;;) " " C " ~ E 0 ~ .!! 1i .. .. 11 -ci 1;j ~ C ~ Gi 'C ~ 8 0 C ~ co 5. .~ > U .. m 'ij " .5 GI < .. co .0 ~ $ C C ~ "0 .;; "5 J! " 0 " C u il C 0 ::::l '5 'E m C j ~ ~ ~ .0 U ~ ~ " OJ E ~ .0 C ~ E " "5 m <5 11 ~ C C1l C1l CO l"- V ll) g- II " ~ 13 " CO ~ ~ ~ .\! 0 .5 V C1l ~ CO 0 0 N ll) ~ C is C> > '" 0 " C m Q Cl:!. V N N ll) C1l ~ ~ N 0 ~~ l'l .c '5 .. :e .. ;;; ~ N N N N -'" -g ~ E .E .. ~ 01 ~ ~ 0 " .!!! m is C ~ 1Il ~ 3 .!!! m ,fl ;;) 'E .. " " u l!! 1i l'l 5 "' ;;; C " OJ .9 0. 0 U 1: m .. ~ Ui ;;; 0 .. I- < co > " m 2 0; ~ m - E '1i > .. 0 " G; " " 'a " .!!! .. .. " " " C C .. C .. .. " " 8 ~ 0 .!!! 'C C .c 0. ~ .!!! "- '2 '0 E 11 .. l'l .. 0 " " m '0 .. u 'C ;;; " C " 0 " ~ in .. .. ~ ~ 13 ~'li 'C " .. 0. C .5 .E .. E .!!! .. " " .. " c C 8 " .!!! > " " m ~ 0 " " ~ 'ii " .2 1Il .;; ~-g 13 " " ,., u ::l " .E'll .5 2 C " .5 "0 - - - GI 0. 'Ii " 3 ;;) GI iii :i III C c iii 0 0 ~ .5 .. 0 m ~ C l!! GI 0; " C 1Il C GI - GI .. > " .;; 0. 0 ,., .. .c III ::::l :;::l u iii E g E ::l C " C " 0 U ]j ;S "5 ..J C .. 0 ~ ::l ..!l! " ~ 0. ] GI ";: :;::l C'" C 0 ~ 0 'E m '0 'E !! '1i > GI E - ::l .. .. .. ::l 0 Gi ~ " " 'C " "0 1Il GI ~ '" .'3 " E 0. .. E - GI U C " 'iii E ::l :;::l > " j.~ - U '" 1i " ~ E " .. E o! > '0 1Il is " 11 -g 0 " GI 0 "0 1Il 0 ~ 'C 'C U u e- > :i .. 13 a:: 0 .5 .5 cd. Cl '0< Cl If C'l .~ ::E 0 '" 0 <( ::;; C> .5 0. CJ 21 Existing v. Anticipated Development ,. +o.<'i >- .- :: I- d z ... ::J . " "[C., ::2: 'd' ::2: ::2: 0 0 0 Z Z z <t: ...J D- C/) W I- <t: I- C/) W Z <t: en 0::: ::J Z 0 Z <t: ...J 0 W D- O ...J W > W 0 Z ::J ~ 0 z ~ ',~I i; , ~ ~- " .~ I 1 1 L____ '--) I z>- <I:!::: lXIz a:::J ::J:!! z:!! -0 00 zc) <l:z ...J_ OZ wZ l1.<I: O...J ...Jl1. WrJl >W wI- 0<1: zl- ::JrJl W " ,.. . , , ~'.".""., :> t. ',' . i,~ ~!~ro@ m 0 ~__Q *~~~;g u&8~E ",0...-00 11><">(") 0<>:1."'- <N f J, .';~ ..~ Vi " '" " I~ o~ 00 , "'''' 0 .. ~ u N ~ i< '0 I~ u '" . " !o ~ 1m u . 0: ,> 0; Iw . l!i .. li I:> ~ <( ~ 1m . (Om iO ~ E ,:> ___c 0- l!i c e <<I 0 m ~'t::::: 0 Gl 1i.i:! 0 " N 1< 'il E :J ;:: 0; ;-' Gl o " " u a: (JE.: 5 0 ~ o '" w w ~ '" '" o " ; '" .!!1 ~ o.~ ('oJ ',Jo <~ .. ~~ l' .. ZZ 0 , ~ .. ~~ i ! E .~ 'C ~ I~ ~ ~ ~< c: E 0 ~ wo. Gl 0 0 0 rnw Cl . & 8- . ~ (10 Gl . ~ 0 ~ 0 ZW ..J 0 .. . ] _2 ~ ~ ~ 0.0 CI. , 0 ~ ~ :;:i= .. ~ . ~< 0 0 0 0 co ~ :l! ~ WW II 0 C3i5 0 o :3 <ll W ~ OJ z w o ~ o OJ O^18lJ31110:J LOGAN BLVD N 'ii~ --=;; , -- , ;&::-- ...' ["- -.. . I." . i > 't , -.- - t :f4: .;c- = :; - -- . r ._-"" r -.,.-_ ---... -- ~ ~. -- . . . III...... J , ---- .1\-:.:, ','.'i:,", I V,' ~ 0 '" .<ll ,Z W ;;: LU '?5 "- ,-' ':II I' .. ..-- r("'"' ...-:~: - i - I~C_~~'~N!/,' '(", ',;11""1'1'" ldDjell\ il," . \"I-{ /, ';'l.1fiC!.', ~I ........ ,.....:. - '- ell ~ z _otC1 z Ul ~ ';: o 01 .s ra o :J: ~ ::J 'i: 'tl ::J C CIl e j.! e .z:..:! 0 'c 0 to) E ~ ~ E .s 'i: o c: o Cll ~ it 'c c: ra ii: en o o N co "<t f'- Il) Il) 0 0 e> Ul C') (0 "<t co "<t 0 ~ 2! co C') .... .... C')_ .... l.J .... 0 <C .... .- 'tl ~ , C. '0 C 0 0 Gi ~ 0 " > .. "C .E ~ ~ " ~ 0 C C " 0 ~ .9 0. 0 ';; 15. 3 " ~ 0. C ::; 0 .... N C') C') 0 C') ~- E .!!! 0 N 0 OJ f'- "<t ~ '" 0 C x ~ 0 'tl '0 C') .... N "<t ~ ~ .Q 0 0 E .E ;; 'E ~ .!!! I<- " ~ ~ c. C " ~ ~ E 0 Ul .2 "5 0 0 ~ -ci ~ ;; U , C > ~ Gi ~ 0> 0 e 0 ... ~ 0> C U 0. .~ > l.J ~ ~ .~ " .S ~ <C w 0> .0 ~ .!l C C ~ " 'tl 'S; '0 ~ 0 ~ " c: u 8 0 0 ;; ::J ;; 'E C 0 l" ~ ~ W .0 B ~ ~ .!!! "C E ~ .0 C ~ ~ 0 "C '0 ~ u ~ , " "C l" 13 C co Il) OJ co f'- f'- co 0 C') ~ ~ ~ ~ U 0 .5 ~ Il) (0 C') Il) C') 0 co 0 ~ 0 ;; C!l 0'> 0 0 C ~ " .... "<t N "<t .... "<t, f'- .... N 0 Ul" Cij ~ '" - ci ;; 0 "C U 0 N .... N ~ "C ;; 0. U 0 ~ '"' 1<- E .E OJ .... -;; 0 0 ~ "C t; ~ .!!! (; C Ul .a ~ .!!! ~ S 2! 'E 0 ~ C " ti 1i ;; ~ ;; ~ ;; .c .9 0. 0 l.J .C ~ .. E U; ;; 0 .. I- <C 0> > ~ ~ 0; ]I ~ - ~ E E > 0 0 " ~ ~ '0. ~ .!!! .. ~ 0 "C "C " C C 0 0 .~ 00 "C 0 .!!! "- C ~ 8 , '" E u.. '0 E .!!! ~ "C .. ~ 0 0 8 > ~ ~ U ~ " 0 '0 U; "C 0 " 0 ~ , Ui 0 0 ~ ~ ~ '" .~ " 13 .. 0. U C .5 0 0 E .!!! :? 0 " 0; 0 ~ " 0 ~ 8 -ci 0 "C .!!! > "C , 0 ~ ~ ~ 13 ii "C "C , Ul ;; 0. " ~ ,.. 13 ::l ~ 0 , .5 ~ ~ "C .E 'tl iii - - ~ 0 0. 0; 13 ;; ~ , ~ ra c: c: ra 0 > .E 0 0 U; :ri c: ra ~ Ul ~ 0; ~ ~ C Ul '0 c: ~ i: ... ... > "C ;; 0. 0 ,.. 0 '" ra ::J :;::l iii 0 E E ::l ::l c: ~ 0 ~ 0 U ]j :s '0 ...J c: ... 0 ~ .!!! " , 0. ~ 'E ~ 'E ~ ';: :;::l c: :; c: 0 ~ E 0 > - ~ ::l -;; ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ E - ::l ... ~ ... 0 ~ .a "C 'C 0 E 'tl Ul ~ l.J " 0 E 0. - ~ ~ ~ 'ii) E ::l :;::l > ~ > ~ ';: .... l.J 1i "5 " , E ~ 0 E w '0 Ul u ti ~ "C 0 ~ ~ 0 'tl Ul 0 C 0 '" 01 :i ~ 'C '0 U > , e. ~ 0 0 13 It: 0 c: .E Cl u Cl "0 <C Cl 0> C) .~ ::E 0 5.<9 '" '" ::;; <9 .5 23 Existing v. Anticipated Development >- f- Z ::J ::2 ::2 ::2 o U (') Z Z Z <( -1 Il.. ;;.... .. ;: :: c o .. , " ,~ ;'d. w W -1 <( ~ o ::2 ::2 z o z <( -1 o W Il.. o -1 W > W o Z ::J I~ 6<: BS LL o z o t) W W ..J g~ :!- :!;Z -::l Z:! -:! 00 Zu :30 O~ Wz Il.Z 0<( ..J..J Wll. > W o Z ::l fen) \~ c~ ~ _ ~ g, c ~ -~:8 2~E~~ ~~8~:e [j~;;~G o"'~ " "", 0<;;'.:'" ~"'. " 0-*' >'" . " ::<Y.., ,C> , ! , A ~ oM ;@. , (C, (i ~' I 0"- N ~ C1JNOO'>C\I Iw '" ~ Ia: 'u "c I~ '0 '1-' Iw II~ 'II~ b I !I~ ~ ~ iO ~ IOC..:5:; :Z~EE~~ :<0 'Ow -' "8 C C a: __ ~ ii o " " , ~. ~~... '\ ~" - . [2 fJ.J_~ ~g "}i?;;.' , .~;- " " c -(j) s ? '" C> '" c , o U ~ '0 " .. . 1: o " . '" . . 'm ~ " "- ~ . " o Ii. ~ Q o N 0; ~ , o !!! 0-'0 0' ~" ,"0- .,. f.,~ , ,':.ih'ci i Ii lith _LI SlSlSl. '/,"I('.'! 'C C .. Cl .. -' c. .. :E n ~ 0 ~ X I ~ ~ il 0:: i; ~ I;; 0 ~ c: ~ ~ ~ ::) z , ~ ~ ~ ~ " " i i OJ ~ ~ ~ o 0 II @ o " tt 2- '" Q) ~ N w "w 00 ::;::<,2 r..9!z Zw )':~ I" "' w" mw o ~W ~Z "0 ~i= U) ~~ o Ww l5f5 o ~ I/) CIl .;: o Cl CIl .... a:I () 3: ~ ::l 'c " II) ;:) l:Q)~ a:I .... I;; ...J-l!!e ~,V! 0 "c ... 0 :::J - Ol E e! t:: E ::s ... o a:: t:: () ~ ~ it l: l: a:I ii: en o o N l{) ~ N ~ <0 l{) '<t ~ I/) <0 <Xl Ol Ol '<t Ol ~ l!! ~ <0 (") I'-- <Xl 0 (") N ~ e:( N ~ " CIl 15 a. c 0 w 4i ~ 0 ~ > '" ~ .E CIl ~ "0 W c 2 C c 0 rn 0 e- w .~ li 0 "0 ~ I'-- l{) ~ <Xl 0 0 Ol ft E 0. C " '" 0 I'-- <0 ~ 0 <Xl <Xl ~ 0, C C x rn 0 " "0 (") (") ~ 0 ~ ..Q 0 w c ~ CIl '" <Xl '<t ~ C a. N '" "0 ~ ~ C . ~ E 0 I/) .2 "3 w w . -ci CIl ... .g 0 C > ~ 4i rn 0 0 c '- ~ rn u :0. > 0 rn c "0 E ~ ." .~ CIl e:( 0 '" .0 ~ ~ " c c C "0 ;; 0 .;; 15 . ~ l: u .~ c 0 ro "0 ::l 0 '3 C c w ~ .0 U . ~ $ .!! "0 ~ ;; E . .0 C E "0 15 rn <5 ~ 0 c N <0 (") Ol '<t <0 <0 l{) (") ~ "0 "0 ~ U > U ~ ~ . 0 ." '<t '<t 0 Ol ~ Ol N Ol 0 ~ c " 1D '" > 0> 0 C rn e l{) ~ 0 ~ ~ Ol '<t I'-- Ol '5 N 0 ,; " rn " N .n w "0 0. U U W '" ~ ~ <0 ~ t:. "" "0 '3 E Q 0 ~ N l{) ~ c 0 "0 ~ '" rn ~ c u I/) ~ . 0 '" rn 0; l!! '" c w ~ C "0 U .... "3 rn 5 ~ ]l ~ 1D 0 u u 0 0. 0 .~ rn ,; ~ if) ~ 0 ,; l- e:( > . " ~ -,; l' rn '0 E ~ > ~ . ~ w '" 1i "0 ~ ,; ~ w "0 W "0 C C C w 06 "0 ~ 0 0 0 '" '0 c u " 0. ~ '" "- ~ '0 E ~ w ~ c ,; 0 > ~ . u rn "5 w u '0 -;;; "0 C ~ 0 ~ u; w w i rn 0 ~ " .~ ~ . u '" 0. U c 6 ." 0 w E '" w ~ -,; w ~ ~ c c 8 ~ '" > . -0 w .2 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 I/) -0 " ~ u ro ~ ~ U 0. 0 " ~ " ~ :::J ~ 0 c ~ ." " .... .... CIl 0 0. -,; u -0 . . 0 CIl a:I a:I l: l: a:I 0 > " w 0 -;;; iri l: I/) a:I CIl CIl l!! CIl 1i ~ ~ c 'u l: '- -0 0. 0 ~ w " a:I .. C l: ~ 0 -,; 15 ::l a:I 0 E E :::J :::J " c " () ;S ...J l: '- ~ ~ .!!! ~ 0 0. -,; ... Q)"i: .. l: l: 0 ~ 0 > c > - c CIl E .... :::J '- rn '- :::J () 4i ~ ~ "ID " . .~ 0 . " I/) ~ > ~ E w E E .... CIl " CIl 0 0 '" '" " c " "iij :::J .. > > ~ .;: - a "3 ~ 0 E " w E 0 . "0 .!!.! ~ ~ 0 " CIl 0 " I/) 0 c 0" Cl 0 '0 .~ G U 0 0. > l: l: 0 e>! " w w 0 U " 0 0:: () Cl ~ e:( Cl :iiE 0> rn- " it", ,... "" "" ::; '" c 25 Existing v. Anticipated Development .._~_._--.._.~-,..,.~".."..._--..,.,.~._._--~,,,,-_...-- >- f- Z ::J 2 2 2 o ~) t':' ~, '1"\ ~i fJ, . '~.\ '~J S.. V C) z z z <( -l Dc (f)' W I- <( r- if) W ~ <( cr: ::J cr: z c z <( o W Dc ~ ,~ .-' ~ W r' ~ z L '-- - >- ..JI- <(- a:z ::::J::::J a::E :E ;!:O ol) z(:l <(z ..J- Z Oz w<( lL...J OlL ..J(f) Ww >1- w<( 01- z(f) :Jw - -", m ~BH ,'Jc "" ',c.:.',- _LL-t -"I --- ~ I .\ I I __1--1..':.:---, .1-.____. ~~-.~ .- iii -- <3 > 1: 3 --;:; - ;..tt)....~ II(/) ,.... co ;;:; .... I,W"', I ilX re o 1'<( :10 ilW ,,,- o -' 1W ,~ I'~ I Iw _.. IIcn 'ii'i t: ';:) - - -'0 !: c e-!,;:: '10 " ~ -:::J !-z ~ Ie: <ll 1:< _ ::J -; ~ :'~...J 18 ~.= (5 _n_a:. _ ------- If! ~ "0 u "" " ~ 8 . '" '0 C Q) '" Q) ..J 0- n! :;: " ~ [ ~ ~ f & ~ " " ~ '& 1': ~ 0; ;; g ~ ~ :".'11~~ ~ ~'=> => d 0.1. . " . ii ~ " ~ t . ~ o 0: ~ o o N ; , j -rcT- - ! ~-----....- .L ~ ,. i, . ','(inn;,,/,';' i.le\" l(.' 0," 00 r.n ;:;:~ ~ (~~ :? ZlL.' .- C'J >':2 u "' ., cw o ~~ "0 LD $~ o ~[; o f5~) ! 1 1 i i I ! "I " III CIJ .. U <( "C CIJ c.. o Gi > CIJ C III CIJ .;: o O'l CIJ .. III o m ~ :) 'ii: "C ::l ; ~ e ..J e e ~li:8 !; t: tll E 0 c:: E (.) '.. o c:: o ~J!l~ ~ 6:~~ 'c C III ii: en C) C) N "C CIJ c.. ~ 0(1):8 "ii l! III > U ~ CIJ .... :: "C .... ~ c 8 :) : .2 "C CIJ C III III:) ..J 1D00No) CO....IDCO I'-N 0 .... ID....ON rnN"C""'" L() -gmT""" 0) .!! 0 .... o "'N 0) '" ID CO.'" N III III 'iii ,- C :i:i ~ C; 0 r::: CI)"i:.. CIJ E" ~ "C III .. 'UiE~.. CIJ o"C III a::Occ ~O~1:l: o ....~ -ti "C""'"-""'- ~ .g I'r- .a i '3 .. o " .~ ~ (0 'lE go .0 'S; i5 '8 ~ ~ ..c e,j -g ~ v " <i "0 -g ~ ~ 5 a :i ~:9 z. ~ 5 e Jg ;:) c ~ a ~ os .~ ~ iii ctI a ~ ~ Q3!!! c .~ <<l ~ Q. ~ '0 ~ ~ 13 (,)"C .[ -g ~- E .!! ~ 8 .... I'-"'N ~ ....0).... '" "'It:!. _ ON"C""'"~ ~ ~ ~ :: " 0 ,2 e- c. " E 0. V .. K " V -ci (fl v v -0 0. '0 ~ .Q-fi o ~.f: ~ ~ -0 ~ 5 8- e e ~ .a .a iji '3 '3 -0 o 0 0 "I:: l:>>'~ ~<{~ , 15 ~ .. v o ~ '" .s -g cP " '" .. .. '" v ~ :5 ~ g .2 (II me ~ v v E ~ ?l -g 8 e c ",p ~ v :: "0 Qi o .8 '0 C m c: v 'i1 ~ E v .0 E -g 0 ~ 13 c E 0 .5 ?l 0) Q) (!) C cu e & B B ~ (0) E.2~~N (0 .... c: u ...... 3: 0 m aJ U) 2 C -g .8 .ca:loo.G.l ~U5~o~ "E -,. 2: l-il _ 11) CD := -g~~51 .!1! ~ B'E iii *~JJ~~ ~~uig-~ a1c"E"Q):!l -g .2 ..!! iji -g ~~i~o Q) ~ -g .S i ~ 0 1ij ~ 0. 0 >. (f) ..c ~U:m;eo > c (U - E Q) Q) .::!: 0 Q) -g E is.. :c E ::l c: lU II) E u~-g~?l U) 0 13 .... 0 ~ C!> .5 s.. (!) 27 Existing v. Anticipated Development .... N o N .... N I'- co o N "'I'-"'ID~ o)No)CO~ ID...."'O).... I()~NN~ .... .... III .... ~ - c c CIJ 0 CIJ CIJ l! l!! CIJ E~E ~~c c~c=O.!l!g ..~.. ~OGi ~! ~i'~:!::~"" OoO=~O.-1O C> .!!. C> !: <( C> ::In;;. >- r-- z ::J ::2 ::2 ::2 o U G z ... ,,,. if...... 0' z z <( ..J 0.. s: w a: u (f) ::<: a: o u z o z <( ..J o W D... o ..J W > LLJ o Z :::J LL o z ,. ~ <( C' '-.- j::. ' l:' :s: U 5: w t:r:: (J C/)>- ::<:1- t:r::_ OZ (J:J z:E :E co Z(J <e> -'z c- wZ a.Z 0< -,-' Wa. > w c Z :J .LL~ ~~~.~ ~ j'.@l ~ i;; s "'.- !::;l = u~8E~ "'''''~ON t s:;:: ~. <:: ;::' ~ ? N m:'dS ;;" ,'f; ","'0 II~ ~ ~ '15 i'< !I~ 10 1m I~ 10 ,z I':> 1'- d~ ill~ <( 1,-, I m:! .;: c " '0 Ui " a: ,. ^ x 3 ~ '''.Ii "' (ij Ii" '" I 0 "' 1 ' O? (5 o . . . Ii ~ <( ~ . "i ~ _ c Q, ~ ~.2 cJ) III _ S :5 E en: _ " N E ;:'"= '. 'tJ (I),,: Gi 8 E JEl:: 5 o !'? " L~ iSI :-',,'i ~ '0 u .. . "E' o o . <r . :, .' :> u " " " ~ i ;: "C C " C> " ...J Q. i ~ ~ ~ o E ~ ~ I 8 ~ i "' ! 8. ~ aJ ~ ~ ~ .2 ~ ~~~~i~ ~ ~ :J :5 :;J ::l II:i r,7.}JS . .~,~ " c OA180l-0S3C fJl'l\JS:jO\:il'J~3^3 " (j ~ w ~. i~ ,\,,,,.-11,',', ~"" ;/'/ii(iii '" ~ ~o --Jr..;I.-'_,,::L,: '" ~ Qw '-'0 ;;,,-, .~ Oz Zw <~ ~~ I<r ~< WQ mw o Ow ~z Qo Q- <~ ~< <r ~w 15D- o '" N o III ~ l.) <( "'C <II C- O <II > <II C III <II .;: o Cl <II - l'll o 5l ~ :) '- "'C .s 5 c: ClI E: ~~~ 'c ~ (.) ~Cii~ E >"- o 0 c:: oa:~.fl~ g' it~~ c: c: l'll c:: '" o o N "'C <II Co c o U).9 Qj !!-; > l.) ~ <II <( ~ "'C c c: 8 :) ~ .!! "'C <II c: III l'll:) ..J <0 o r-- C'i~ ~r--~ COOl <0 r--N~ '<tI.C')OlO 10 0') "" 0) ~ -g~ NN .!!~ 0(0<0__ OI.C')Olr-- COCOI.C')(") '<t~ iii iii l'll'- c: ;; ~ Cii 0 c:: Q)"':;:; <II E- ::s "'C._ III _ E::s+: = o"'C III a:: 0 c:.= <OI.C')N~ r-- <0 co I.C')NI.C') ~~~g OlO(,,)~ (") <0 ~ r-- <0 '<tIN N (")1'" co NI.C')I.C')I.C')~ <J) 'T"'""'r"'""W",," <0 (")r--N(") ~ ~~~~~. III _ _ ::s c: - CPO CD ; EUlQ) ECE ::S5C: c:.2c: ':::o.!!! i~'" ~O'ii~ >~ ~_,;:",l.)..,.. oco~C)o.!1h Cl8Cl].<(Cl:iiE~ " ID " C 0 .Q e- o. ~ E 0. ID 0> ~ ro ~ .2 -2 -g "3 " o ~ "C 0) 0> C III 'w g n "5 0 "$ C (,) "5 C ~ .D 0 ~ "0 <c Q) ? [ij 0 <5 Q5 -g a: ~ 0 ~ ~ 6 g dl (9 :g ~-o .?- ~ ~ ~ ~ .2 C ~ B 5 '5 "g, ~ III ro _ ~ ~ ~ ~ c "., !5! .~ (f) '0 E O:i o > ~ (,) "C .~ .g ~ E ~ ~ 8 i:J III ID ID U 0. U ID 0 ~ 0.. Q5 U o ::> .!; ~ ~ i:i ID C ID U ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ .2 .3 i1i ::; "3 TI .g .2 [;l :;f ~ ~ 29 Existing v. AntiCl'P' ated D 1 eve,opment 'i; C " ID o ~ ~ .g [ij $ (J) "00 U ID ~ :oS C C 0 o " ~ c ~ ID ID E (J) Q)-O C > ID 8 e c "0 a. E Q) .S (j) C "0 (j) ~ Q) "'CI ;; C ID ID - ID ID n -g "'6 u C C ID "- ::> (J) iij ~ ~ ~ * (Y) -g B C\i rn ro ~ ~ .8 o 0. ID ~ ~ !!2- ~ > rn 3l ~ 'K C C " 8 :J ~ ID -g vi g ttI 0: U5 ijl ,g {j g. Ji c w * ..!P. ill "0 -g ~-5 ~ -g E o w iri ~ " ~ Q) ;S 15 ;; - ::> '5 a5 .~ <Il E (]) ~ c -g 8. w 13 '5 ;:; C 0. (9 vim 0. 0 E 52 ~ 0 " ID .em ~ OJ ro E " tIi-* i' ID J!! ~ ID ID 1i:i -g ~ TI (f) .!:: ID C 1J 0 u fJ .s r: U ~ ID C :5 0 ID U > C ID ID i' E ~ C U ~ " 0 ~ (9 t'l ::, >- ::' >- ~ ' c- U{ -'~ <(z z ...' >-::l ::) ~; 0:;: ~ ~:;: ~ ',~: zo "'" Vi -u ~ 0(;) 0 Zz <(- (' -'z ~ oz c.J W<( 0--' Z 00- -':;: Z w-, ><( Z Wo- w.: 0<( < Z~ CL ::l<( - LL ~ ~ <r. Cl. < ::<: < u.. ...J < >- 0 a: z c z < ~ ~ ~ ;;..L ~ ~ ....:....: > '-..j' z ::) ~ ~ .=.:;. '" if, " (\) II~ .... "' ... 0 ~ :2' ... ... ... ~ c co ~ N N 0 0 ,10: u '0 ] [L~ 1:'0( , ~ '0 " ~ ~C1 110 u ~ <lJ ,W '" '0 , " Q~ I,g; " " c , ~w " co << :"C ~- ~ '" 0 " ,~ ~ 0 . :l IL IliiJ 0 " " " 0 0 c< . -' 0 0 0 we iir:; '" i ! i CO row . Q. I (jo I<=> '" f z") " :iE ;~ 0 0 _L ':Z ." III ~2 I=> " .0;1- a CO ,< I~ ., << N cr.!,.! ~ 13 ~J !'W t , . i a IIU) ;; ;; 0 j;::lI .! ii ;; c, Ii. CO , ,0 E !l ~ , " ~ 'C ~ 0 , '.2 ;; 0 1 '0 N .,< .. " " -' " 0 '0 ;; 0 , 0: 0 c c 0; , c I if> I i . r "--1 C' ~ j-;;;i ".' ~ .'. \ .,J',-,} l '~y . j' > ~ ~ 8, c c ~ ~ ~ "0 " '" g ~J o .~ * I '~ o . . ,,,... ., _, .....,,:..... ~.___._~ m_..__ '''l\~ __'---_.~_......, '_ h l~ r:.:.)- ;~. N m ;.p ~, ~. rr- "~\. ',-- ~, b-~)'''..'-6 .' ".:ifU-/--,~, :........:::,.:~l:J 3~~'\, ;l'I'il\;'y~'~T::,-:- ~ . _, :G'"tf1:;._iJ: - L~';:'~~;:"~: - i"::~", elf-,', " _J"'.-';; ____._' " ',~3:,,;~' ./'I z ,i,: ~ i /i '\I.'i "1,/;, (0 NO ..... ~O~~ III L{) I'- ~ I'- ..... Gl L{) N ..... .. ai ~- t.l <( "C Gl , C. 0 c 0 00 Gi ~ 0 ~ > ~ ." J2 Gl ~ ." .!i III 00 c C c 0 m Gl .2 e- 00 'in ";: 0. ~ ." ~ 0 00 CO (0 0..... ~ E c. c ;; ..... .!!! Cl 00 I'- N ~ ..... ~ 0, c c m 0 Gl "C ." Ol ..... ~ g 00 ... c ~- ~ J2 ~ C III Gl .!!! ..... ." ~ 0 c. c 2 ~ ~ E 0 III .2 ~ 00 00 ~ .,; Gl ~ f! 10 ~ c > ~ III Gi 0, 0> 0 e C ~ U ~ .... > t.l m C ." C. E 5 ~ '0; .~ .!i Gl <( ! 0> D ~ "C "C C C ." l/) 0 ." 0 ~ ~ C ~ ." e C u '0; C 0 0; l/) C III ~ 00 u '5 C ~ ~ ..J e e ~ ~ D d ~ ~ .s ." ~ 0; E ~ D ~ ~o C E ." 0 m U ~ 'c "C ~ ~ u C 00 I'- NO Ol CO L{)00L{) i ." ~ U > .~ ~ ~ 0 ::I N I'- (0 L{) <')N N ~ C ~ 0; C!) > '" ~~ 0 0 C m E' E (0 (0 ~-"!. N N 0 .; 0; m "' '5 00 13 u 00 .... .c: <') 0..... c. U M E 2:- "C ~ E g 00 ~ N QJ i: (0 N..... C 0 "C 0 ~ .!!! ~ ~ C m III L{) ~ 0 .!!! 0 c: J!l f! 2 C 00 ~ ." d III '3 l'l ~ .c 0; C ~ 0; u 0 0. Cl it 0 t.l 'C m .; f? Ii) ~ 0 .; C ~ <( '" > m ~ ~ ] m - ~ E 0; 'c 00 0 ~ Qj ~ ~ '0. ~ .!!! .; 00 ." ." ." C C 00 C C 00 "" ." 0 ~ 0 III .!!! 'C c ~ u "' c. 00 .!!! u.. ." ii: '0 E Qj 00 i'l C .; 0 ,e: ~ ~ m "0 00 u ;;; ." C ." 0 ~ (ij en 00 00 'f ~ ~ ~ -5 0 'C ." U ~ c. 0 c. c 0 00 .~ ." 0 00 E .!!! ~ ~ c ~ ~ N 0 ." " .!!! ~ u -c ~ ~ .2 ~ ." ~ ~ u 0; ." ." ~ III -c c. ." ~ >- u ::I ~ 0 ~ .~ ~ ~ ." .~ "C - ... ... Gl 0 c. 0; u -c ~ ~ Gl III III C C f! 0 > .~ 00 0 ;;; :ri C III III Gl Gl l!! Gl 0; ~ ~ c III 'u C c > ." -c c. 0 2:- 00 "' ~ :;::: E E ::I ::I C ~ c ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 1; ..J C .. III 0 0 =: O.!!!~ ." ~ 0. a; 0; C1,).~ :w C 1i C 0 > c 'e: '0 c Gl E'" ::I .. .. ::10- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "C ~ Gl t.l Gl 2 2 ." E c. 00 E Ill... Gl ~ c ~ 'in E::I:;::: > G > -;:-.-.... U ~ '3 '3 ." ~ E ~ 00 E .. CDI..-U) U U d ~ ." 0 ~ Gl o"C III 0 c o "'IE 0,_ p 'C U > ~ c. > 0 0, ~ 00 u s II:: OC.E Cl ~ Cl!<(Cl~ ~ 0> ::1 ::1 0 0 <( <( C!) .~ 0. C!) 31 Existing v. Anticipated Development >- ~ z ::> :2 :2 :2 o o ;. ~. :: s. Ul ... .' "..... ,(,- "_.i tj c.9 Z Z Z <( ...J Q.. (/) (/) W 0::: Q.. >- o c.9 c:o z o z <( ...J o w (L o ...J W > UJ o Z ::> L..- a Z r-, ~ f-. <.. , ' >- I- C)- _Z m::J Z::E -::E 00 zu <l:C) ...lZ 0- wZ Q.Z 0<1: ...l...l WQ. >00 Woo OW ZD:: ::JQ. >- U ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ . u 8 0 " 0 " 9 ;,,1'1 BRO\fJARD COUNTY ,-INE- "" ~ ~ r z z L. N " <. D D D Vi 13 V> iO ~ 'lffJ ~ 0 ~ .... , 0 0 IJ3 " ~ b~ ,<( 0 "' _0 ~ ~ ~~ ,10 " s Q l ~~ i!W .. 'tl ~ ! ~ 110.. . C ~ , ,w i! ~ r~ ,.0 " E 0 " " "" 11m 0 '" I " " " "< u " " g " " w~ . . 0 0 rnw > '" ..J 0 0 0 l 1 "' ~ ~o Iw " '" ~ c. . 0 ~ ~ 2~ il~ . '" ~ -2 ~ " 0 ~O .. ::E ~ 0 0 0 0 ~- a <" II: ~< " II".. " <( '" ~w ~ c_ ~ \"-~ N Cifj . ;; " 1:0 .!2.! 0 c "- jo E f:! " 0 rn " ~ 'C :3 0 0 ,Z 'tl 10 0 ,<( Vi E :> i N 1-' " 8 'tl I 0; i '" c c I ~ , , 0 !!'. :JADE COUNTY LINE @) w Z >- r ~ C @) C' ,- 0: Z C :2 . ~ N ../, Z ::; ._-- --~ , ",' I:, ~. iiii'. 4;'I"h ) , l \'" ;iJ/it.!;( Ii' 1.3. l'he Evtmt Of Vacant & Oe,eJopable l.and -\. Background: Section j63,319t (2) \b} FltJriJa Stan.lk.'s. reLjuil>~S E\J.ludLl\!n 8~ .\ppnlisal Report" [u ~b';;;.'.~:'i Lll:.' r:'xknt of vacant and d-:\ ;;:11)publ~ land 'vvilhm lh(: rvte\'unt .juflsdicti\)n. in (01 her ('cunt:,. 1:(>11'- residentiaL dc\dnpmcnt lS restricted by the' nmure (11' the C'uLlnJ.,-,') j- utUI\,' Land l ~;c D('slgnati ;')~i pruvisions. Tlk'ret~x('_, it i~; safe, :JL kdst under currcnt ',::cmdit:\\fU. to as:-:urnr: that nli.l~t \d_C~~nt JJic:l dcv'elopahle land I/ViJt Lljjjjnat<:~!;" h~ dc\.,:I(JpeJ -.:ither as re::;]cL..:ntial prl\pCn} or ~l'.: 3omt: LYpC (,!' agricultural use B. Analysis: StaWs analysis of the acreage and percentage of dcveloped land. as well as that of the vacant and developable land. in Collier County was gcnerated utilizing the most current Collier County Property Appraiser's OtTict: (PI\O) tax parcel data. (Deccmbcr 1. 2(09). Stalr summanzed the number of acres per Land I isc Code from the Florida Department of Revenue's (FDOR) ollicial land use designations. Please refer to Tahles :"-1 and 2.3-2. Vacant & Developahle Lund '1'11. ') -, a) 12.",-__'. 3 4 5 I 6 ~ 12 11 1S 16 17 1..8 19 20 21 22 23 f- 23 25 27 28 29 "30 32 83 34 3'3 36 37 )3 r-- , 3'9 .'11 i-- 42 .13 ,-l1 ,l15 ,17 ,18 4'9 I r- i-- I Single Family 94.9.7:5: Mobile Home'S __.~___".,_.________________L~_~__ 3,489 ""_~__ ~,722t ~:~~:;~:~y ._,--~-~---~~------------+ 10.1~~ iO.;::~! ---.--. - - ---..- . -M.-.---t-- Sl ......-.-.---- --------:;-:;C"\ ~:~i:;::~~~omes n___~:====_~~=j:______ 16 ______) ~;~l Boarding Honle$ (1Il~titlJr.iof'dli ________---j-----___~_ 328 ~___._=~ Mul~i-~3mj~y less than 10 units _______~_------- 1,986507: Stores OneSto(l( _ __.___.______________.__~-~------- .:174 _____443l Mixed U.;i.e, I.'~'-' ~tUf':': '.:lnJ Ofrl((:: i :$30 292i Superm;:.H~et i 10 R:~gionJl Shopping N1;Jli::, _____,..~=-=~_~~.~~~+=--~4 Community Shopping .Ct:l1ter _____._~_ ! 74 One..Story Non-PtrOfessiorral Office::.; 120 Multi-Story Non-Professional Of tiel!::' 1.27 P-rofes,slonal SenJice Buildings 46 Airport:S, M,ar'lnas) BU's TerminaLs & Pi{~h 47 fl,estaurants, Caf,etf-.:'I'i,015 ____.__________~__ 101 OrivcHrn Reslaur:tnL:. 42 .-.-------- Fifl.'Jmjalln::ititutiQns 85 ._--,--,._-,--_._----,,-----~- 27 R:ep.dir Service Siwps 'Service St;:Jtiml:',> Automotive Rep:air, :)er'/jc.,e, OJI ::~~~:__._ P:<lrJdnH: V.J1t5, MobiJe Hom~ S",i:~___.__ WhoJesd~e, Ma(tuf,Jl;-t'J'rin~, and .Produ,cc Flor'I:;;~, Greenhouse:3 Outk<ts 1.31 2.11 -"--"--"~--- 51 l],j 7!)! =m 11'2 1'311 43 , :3.4'1 '~~I ---~d ;;1 5'5 :)7 71 EIfH.:lo:iieo The-dt,ers, AluJ~t,':;lrjum~ ._---~._..__._-_...- -~-------- NigllH Clubs) B,ars, c.H1,d Co,cktaii: L.~i'..;y~Jo!:e.:____,_._.___ 10 B-owl~ng AUeY-5, 'Sk..atil1~ R~f1gs, (r::~~>f!'!.~~:i!r~:::::...._._______~______,_ . 3 Tourist ,AHr,<1ctii.Hli _ __~___ I ____. 220 ~:~~~:,'s~;:AUIOln d G';~r.;;c:,~--~~-=-__~L==~-==~, ~ Hl.Jt<eb, rv1Dtel:, _.___~._.._._._~.__. ____~__~ 7'9 t:ight ''11<Jn'Jf--'3Ct,~r1~'lI;: __ ___'''__-'_" ______u_________ 275 He.i:J\lY r-Jl"H'<IJ~.a(,~,:.Jflin,g ___~_. .:; Lvmber Ydrd" S~wmill\. P'I","'.n~ M.lh. ___~_. t5 fruit, Veg:etabI1es, ,jrl1j ;Vk:,.)\. -3D Othl::LI'" f' Clod Proc.;-~;J5iJ1 -4 "-----.--.---.----...- -- .-.---- 11 442 126 17'5 31 H .22,6 __-=---- 7371 721 3jl _._-_._-~ 11; .---.-------si ----;-1 ~ 11.5'5'1.1 22\ - ,-rr: t :>.:):;:>1 ___ lS,~ 213i -------~ -1H ~----===qi 309 3506 Mi"'er<l~ P!roo~::,.)~,llg War"!(V..lU5eS, ;dlld DistribunGt~ C,~::nt"i'r-.:, 2 15 l':l51 308' 4~ 1301 d I 1,1:52' In,du:;,tri.a~ St.orage U=ueil, '::ql-,ip, J~~!~/ld~~'-:!~.:?~L Church:!:',> 72 Pri'.'atC'Sdw{JI.) ._._-----~-+----- 4 23 Sol 1111 23 59 73 7'J 75 76 77 78 79 Pri~/;,,)te Ho':>p~t.aUs Home:) for Ag<?d Orphanage,; _._______,_..__..._ Mortuaries, Cemet::,ri(i";; __._._______..___,_._~_~.~_..__ Clubs, lodges, dnd Union Hak:i. _.____._____.____._____ Sanitariums,. Convalescent, dnd 8'25t Horne~ Cultural Organization'; 9 195 --.-.-- 1'5 --------- 22 S<H..lr'~f:'. 2009 Prclper<:y Appr.::lig.er ~'?cor<:'ls:!. C,)I!i",' <:::,,")(Inl, .-;;.::; (:~11.1 l(iCWl1 (~ Den'/opahleL...md 1. t. I "))) alllC ~.).'" VACANT AND DEVELOPABLE LAND USE_CODE DESCRIPTION COUNT ACRES 0 . Vacant Residential 29,658 105,199 10 Vacant Commercial 1,115 1,657 40 Vacant Industrial 204 584 SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAIL & INDUSTRIAL 30,917 107.439 51 Cropland Soil Class 1 128 18..959 52 Cropland Soil CI,1s5 2 121 41,383 60 Grazing land Soil Class 1 845 85,106 61 Grazing land Soil Class 2 2 1,258 66 Orchard, Grolles, Citrus 268 57,660 67 Poultry, Bees, Tropical Fish, Rabbits., etc. 455 2,659 69 Ornamentals, Mise, Agriculture 309 3,386 SUBTOTAL AGRICULTURAL (Code 51-69) 2,128 210,912, 70 Vacant Institutional 558 15,996 SUBTOTAL INISTITUTIONAL 558 15,996 TOTAL 334,347 '30l.H"!:::e: 20Q9 Pr')Qi?rty A,Pt)rJi:~,er Rew(t!:1:s!, ColJip-r (:oun1y (;1:3 ~j8t") Based upon the PAO's records, there are approximately 1,354,936 acres in Collier County. Approximately 138,1 no acres or 10 percent of Collier County consist of developed land. In addition, 334,347 acres or 24 percent of Collier County consists of vacant and developable land. Please refer to the map on page 2.3.4. The Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (('10M) appro\cd by the BCC in January, 2009, as a supplemental plmming tool projected that the build-out population for the County would be approximately 950.223. The most recent University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimate for the County's current population is 333,032 for April, 2009. The current population estimates (333,032) compared against the amount developed land (138.1 00) equates to .415 acres 0 f d'~veloped land per capita. Utilizing this ratio against the projected build out population of 950,223 ",ould yield a total of 394,343 acres of developed land to satisf) the projected population. The total acres of land developed (138,100), plus the vacant and developable land (334,347) results .in approximately 472,447 of land either developed or developable or expressed another way 20 percent more developable land than the population projections would require.. It should also be pointed out that the current, .415 acres of developed land per capita is cieri ved in part from antedated large lot zoning practices such as the estates. Based upon the regulatory allowanccs of the GMP the lilture rate of acres of developed land per capita is expected to diminish. C. Summary: 3 Vacant & Developable Land Bu:;;;.;d UpUT~ tilC '~~ald dna!~\\l>, 1._ l;jll\..'t z" 1;)[/-'::_:1';, !" ',,[ -~' >L;!!I-.:i(::i ~;n'J)ur dc\ciurubk land Itl ~il'L'\JJliin()dL~ll' ;~:tLlr',: ~'-J,\\\ it -;:,;:'u_,~l i-,~' "")'l'~'\l lr'ur [>111 F i' "1 liurl/:l!! \-(C'~jL till.' p;{_)'~.t (;;.;>.\:n: I r,I,:::T,'r, pruJe..:tiDlb Ii)!" the Cutlnt> dL yeLif "':l!_>~ :,\;sling uti,.' dC'\ciorcd tp ..1:\ ".I..pahk projected j{,r the il,1rlZ('f] \ car 13"'1::>\',, ]-~ u_ 3~9,660 " ~___'97~l)'lQ , r 2il20 ,406,500 !----~------~------~---- --t------~--'-".-" , ,2021 414,184 I'-'---~----- ....--------.~. 2j)22~22,013 YEAR I 20W [------------------~.. i 2011 1-- -- -..--- : 2012 ,---._.__._~--- i I 21lt3 1--..-......... ----. , 2014 l___~_..__ 2015 2016 2017 2018 [------ ..--..---~----- 2019 ~--~-_._-~--~--- I'RO,IEcriO..... .B3,600 .. c-.....c,39~?X6 n _ 346,087 I --------- 352,505 1-______________.___..______ ..-,---t---- 3~<).!.O:lL____.._ ',;~':.:.< ~'I"l .:'i,!..: i\i.r_'~i ' in; ,,:',' ,;', i l_~~:>.'! ,',,-, r<.,...;<::r~ 365,700 ------------- ..1- . , 373,518 -+-+(L-+di', cUi t!l(,__r('~L'c lli i l _;.3tlf', !.:Lr:;..:.:'d l!pnli ~h :~:nd, i I, ,', I;~ ~,~lJl '~1;"-\.>\nlnH,dJk rh1fQ!;:u: n__n.....l.!l!,SO.. UI-HT), : 'i".II..-'~:!\": li\ 1:";(' 1 I')T'[7\J;: \-~-,lr, 1 I I , ul i -- --I 2U23 429,991 ,_..._n..__nn., I . I 2024 I 438,119 I-.-----"'--~---_..-----------j---- i L____2025__nn. .._.._.,. 4,46,49.0.._______ 4 VaCUlIl & J)et'c/ofJahle Land 2.4 - Changes to Regulatory Environment A. Background: Section 163.3191 (2) (f), Florida Statutes, requires the Evaluation & Appraisal Report to assess the relevant changes to the state comprehensive plan, the requirements of this part, the minimum criteria contained in chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the appropriate strategic regional policy plan since the adoption of the original plan or the most recent evaluation and appraisal report update amendments, B. Analysis: The table on the following pages provides recognition of the statutory changes and their relationship to the Collier Growth Management Plan 1 Statutory ehanges " .. " ..- "c Z.. -E c.. ..- EW " ClQ .. E <( 0.. to V> -g~:g~ III 0 0 u CIJ:Eu::s ! e ""'" ~ "OCDO"E "CI -e tD D.. <( :> ~ 0 to '0 ..J-< N V. -.i' << ex> <(M -.-t Zo .c u N en ..;.., u.: cO! M~ CO "'o~ or- +::i CO ~J!f1 -- ... o.U 0 to ,r--- .c .c'" U U M Ui~ N~ V. III N .... f1 .co ....c'O o C)'C .c::i:~ u '" . ~ "'C Q) 0) .,. 'c-E 0-.2'0 o .LL N en Q) C ..; en ..c 0 o o::~ OM 0 (l) (\Ill r:c ra U ~ 'lilt Q) Q.) u.. ~ c,-s _.c fu M 0 CD C CD ....c ro ::-- G,) 013......; .... _<(0 Ec<( ... 0..2:- ....co ~.~ t::.c 88.5 ",<( Be- e::: "0 ro'co CD . a.l~a::: .c~-g="O U..., OJ co cu 'Ea:8. C!; <( " (I) .r. -- ~..c 2~~~ ... 81M N!...- '0 (j) (j).c ~ '" ctl= ::>.0 0-'" (j)- -a'" '" (j) >-(j) :s:5 c ~ (j) 0 '0- .- '0 o C -'" 2 E c (j) (j)'O E (j) c ~ ~ ::> (j)- >.2 0_ Ol(j) - (j) rl E .2.8 l" Ul .- '" ::> U o-~ (j) " ~ 0 .8U>u "0 >o.Q 2Q.Q; ",a.a. ~~O> U .... .!:: .. Q) C -_ C ""to'" ~:=o.. '0 (j) ::>'0 '" (j) .~ a. mO rn c"C _ OU oCt! 0 .......0 :;:: 0 rn- cu....... ~ c"C .::c D ro@ ~~....... woo a; ~.~ ~~ Q)~ E .25 ~(/) 8 raO to ~ 0 ._ (l) Q.) CI) E c (,)"C -Er::: "'w :Co cO .EWv) ::::J...... 0:';::; c: 5: c ,_c en.!! ::a:;.,g '0 ~ OlCij 0.0 ro oa.",'.::cn Q)CI)ro Q) 0 c"'C c: en c: ....... ~Q) 0 c.- :.2 ~ Q.) >:.;::::; it: ~ ... en'- n> Q)..!!! Q) res 1i '(3 c :E~::.~= ><Q)~ ~ "- al ra .- Q) "C :;::: E '" ~ - E (j) ",'E ._ t....... en ....c In - Q) c,-..c. ....... ~"'C o U Q) en:,:::: o~ " c -oE.!!!;: -a-=",- -c'" (j) -0" (j) c (f) ns (/) -roc-"OQ.) m--c !l>~g.!sE :"Q'C(l) _ a. >"'E ug~eo acne ;"':"f/)-oQ..Qj D=&.w ..q-..oc..:-:..> ;....;..0> "-~ro..-<D N'-O -....- _ _"'0 __ Q. r:n -----t;---- ~~- Ol .0:: '0 c '" E E o o (j) E >- .0 1!l c '" E E o u '" > <Li 'C;; Q) c c &..~ Ul '" e~ o G3 - .c ~~ 'O.c sL.... 00 0: (fi o -is ~o '" "" to - .9 C (j) E c Q; > o Ol ro o .Q '0 (j) C - 0 0._ (j)- :t= to '" :;; ~" o ._ c~ C 0 is u o 0 - (j) C .c .- ~.!l .E'C '" '" (j) E ~E o 0 ~ u n..c u -" :!.Ul C '" (j) .0 .9 C o Zro .!!10 ~.Q ~ (; ';'_00 ~>-. ~c"'C :=::Jro ES.8 (j)(j)0l :SEe 005 (j) ~ N > '" ~ z.QO j'gEOJ c: Q> .!:: (j) E C '" C ~ C'J rn ar.:: "6- .....'0-0 (j) > C .cc'" ~o-; ~ c~ ~ .- 0 (() &'u E ~=E o (j) .:-:.. I > ~~g, h " '" ~ " E :D " '" E '0 " o..G:j :.6 > " '';:: t/) u " B o -< z r--- r--- ~ "" "" '" ~ C o l" :;::; :J tV "'5.8 E ~ _~ tV ci. o ..c:..... Q> ro 1: ..... Q) ~ E -o.cenQ.Q> Q) ffi U C ,- CI) ~ E~,!2"5:J 0" ro.2m"E-g a.Jg .8 g::; tV~ OC ._-~Q) .....cv .!:!3:oenQ>..... ~(j):: c:..... C _ :J v Q)<D"-en:5 .'2", EOC:-"- :t= U C NO CV C Q) Oc CG ~!!!:S g>'s >O=-C ._ en & (V) E ~ 0 -g'w _Q)..c::::J>. men ro c:~ .... m E ~tO 0 OJ ;: (j)-;:: O~ cnW E C - >.1::' rn > 0.- w.n=.....O U c: .~.....:a:J c: Q)C g.cz8ro :S-E. ~E~a5~ r.n~ o~Eoc: (1)i::' .....(1)0.....0 O)'- -0 U -0 .- ~5 ~~wwm 5E c:J1D~6, UE ~-gLro'U; ill8~O~~U~ .--..c::::=::: ~O~. . 0> ~I~ '0 (j) '0 .;; o >-C5. Q.' - a.'" ,,8 UlN ~ - "'~ mCG ~.o (j) E .c(j) -0 -(j) 00 c_ Oz z c: a.::> 0_ '0 C '" (j) Q) E C'O =c: 'O(j) ~ E '0'" (j) C .cto ~Q (j)"" '0 ~ C 0 2 ;: X Ul w'" ~~ ::=::u "'to .... N " ::0 oj .~ Ki o..;f! 0.- <~ aU z'" II is :; <0::", zcfj -., G> '" -., G>_ G>e ZG> -E eG> G>_ ~~ em G> E < >- >- '" ~ - '0 ~ '0 -.,j a ~ '0 '0 '0 " " " " ....<0 OJ) OJ) OJ) OJ) G>o - '" '0 '0 '0 '0 "'.::: '" " " " " " "'- 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e! ..:<<: 0 0 0 0 -.,G> I .S- .Q " " " -'" -'" -'" -.,.::: '-'l{; u u u u <,! ::>'2 <<: <<: <<: <<: ....< '" "" ~ " Vi . <<: < Z - Z ui u: - '" Me COo ~,- - ~ to G>_ -- 0.(.) to .::: (.) ..e () ::> "'- a 2c 0.0 E~ COOlo. oXo o Ol '0 '1"O~ ~co oro>- 0'-0 N~c ,roOl I/)Ol::> , >- 0- "-OlOl M.;::.t: co-c ~ >. 0 ~ ~ Ol c G> > 0 CiOl"" cac!9 .s::: CO'- (.) a.~ O-"'Ol -~..e ",0_ '" ~ E g.J!e. cg+->-cn .c en-'" O.~ ffi a:i roEE '0'0'0 o.cc ::> Ol Ol ~ E E .Ernro ~ J" Ol'" .!:: ~ c '" c '" ro'- Ci~ -g~ ~15 Olo. :ffi~ '" () Ol c Eo >-Ol .o~ C Ol ,2m roO c_ :0 0 ~ ~ o C o Ol () E Ol t:: . ..ero'" ~ 0. e ~ Ol 0 .Eo; ooQ.).!! Q)..cCi :2-_ > '0 '" ace ct C'O"- .. >- ~ =- 0 ca -c_ o~= :::. ro E Ol ui ro : 00 :u -g 0. ~ .s::: () c '" Q)._ "'D o.",~ "'~ to ~ c ;= Ol Ol '" ..eE- -0 c '" ~"tI ;€g!t: ~o.!!! Ol_ e- to o ro ~ +=-g2 ro_ woB 0.- oQ)~ o u._ oem cro- .- U) ~ ~'(f.j rI) o"'c o ro.Q Ol '" ~:g 'S: ~ > 0 'S e a. 0-0.0l Ol 0 c n::........:;:: .. ui c """":Q)Ql ~'g ~ -wa. ~ 0) E _ro. 0. :E '" "tI ~ to ;= '" - '" "tI e .!!! to ~ ::> ~ >- - e ::> o Ii :;:: :; E " - '" Ol '0 .;; o ~ a. N ::Oui ::=::... ~G> ~~ -to '0 o ..e '" Ol ~ 05 Ol Ol ro l!! () ro Ol =: Ol~ c to .- 0. '0._ .2.::: () '" C"tl .- ~ -to 2;= ais E '" Ol"tl .!::: s::: ::> ... 0-- ~Ci '" ~ Ol 2 .!Q ca > OlOl a::.!: ,-~ M.Ql -'" 'OOl ::=::'0 ~ ~ ~o -- >- ~ ro 0 E Ol .eJ e ,- ::> "tIO '" '" ~ Ol () ~ ",n; '" ~ ::>2 "tI~ e Ol . ~..c-g Ci~'!!;! ~-Ol ::> Ol.e ~c~ Q) .-- :cEo to 0", ~ () () Q)U:';:; ....ro'" '" .- J: (/) tv ca ,2__ ~-() ::::~~ ro~ro .eC.e ......~u '" Ol Ol Ol:t;:", :'2::C;::J >......(ij e m.u o....u<o:: Ol Ol ......:, c c cD ,2> ~ -",- 'O",~ :::=::<<1 Q.) ~Ol.e S..ao .8 ,< .eo .QlO .e", ai~ ~'5 , 0- 'OOl Ol ~ .~ in 11 E - c () Ol Ol.!!!, E .S: e c: 'Oo.~ 00_ OJ Ole> Ol '" 0 ~ E~ '" 0. ro g>.9g .- Q)- -g>.8 \.i=Q) Ol"tl Ol .2: e g ro'CJ9 (ii c:.~ "- CD (/) ffi>- en _:=ro (/)"Ern 0).- 0 :g C'c ~~-5 0:::;2 ..:-:.. >. lD Q)~"O ::=:::~"5 ~Q)e Su a. ~ r-- r-- ~ '" M <D '" Ol ro l!! o .8 Ol f; ~ 2 ~ E .w ro '" 0, ro 0-.,- a.C:~ to.- co= E .9 en;: 0 U .S: c: 2 tt~ "0.- ..... .... c: Q) 5} ~.! ~ ~ ....~e :5 "' 0. g>-g B .~ .- co en. -g (/) <( CHD ---0 .!:m -;~o -goo ~~~ l.:Q) cu C:.!:: ~:5 en Q)::J ._ C "0, E g . 10'- QJa.L...(/)(i).!! ~ .Q ... C "od! Ol Ol> c: OJ Q) r::: "'E-", :!2Q)c:: en... >"'0 I; c: CD 0_ ~\-"'C CD I- 0 0 ~">::c a.. I- - 0 0 <<J ..:-.:..~ ~ 5 I- 'C ~(I) m- n.... ;=-c'C~;...:,~ S~e.QS<<J - o a> Ol ro t:: o .e '" a> 05 o ... ~ ui e o :;:: 'c ;;:: '" "tI '" a> '0 S o ~ a. Olc .5 8- =::> "''0 ;= a> "tI'" ~E o Ol '" '" '" ::> "'- <.> ro u;.;::::; to c ~ a> 'f :Q ~ '" a> l!! 0.>- 0= - E 2 ro c- a> a> EO, c c Q)w > ~ oJ" Ol _'0 ro Ol () c o 0 -Nuj "'",Ol Ol ro c "~ ~:o o ro c .zc'i: :J"- C <( In"m ."~t e5 ~ 5: 2: o '" '" Ol () () ro c ro t5 ::> ~ U; c o () .8 E ~ g ~ ::> .0 ro " - c o ~ () g ro c < "" """ " :0 '" u 00 :..:: ~ o.~ 0.- <"g -u Ze II 2 <..3 ~ '" zV5 'tl .. 'tl ..... .. e Z.. "'E e.. ..- EW 'tl em .. E <( '0 'tl;= " .. 0 bl) It) .c "E 11I_- .. .. ~ ~ ~ 0 'tl" " 'tl.c"" <( ;= u < < z en u: -Ill Me COo ... ,- ... ... '" ..... ... .- Q.u '" .c U TI1w E ~~ 3: > ~ irn[ '" 0 ~ ,,- 0 :=IDc co c.. m 0 o Q,1... (/) o ca Q) l- N 1>>:0 ~ .:5{gcu gEoE N o~ 8 en':: ro.s . _ C I u..":; rn 2 .. ftS...... co M"ctl.... CD._ "0 Q) 'C""'~Q)"'O ...ca......o SelBE '" ~ ~ I'G Q) lD 0 .c "O..c ai U.2=E o " ~ 0 -.!:...... CJ = ii)'c.~ ::J::J ;= e E '" 0 '" .c- .c:g::ai U::J~E 0>- 0 ~~g Cii ~" ~ - ~ -oro.2 C >'Q.lS!! Ci...c: 0.. 0.- '" ",- > o ._ 0_ Of> -cc .l!l"'''' ._ c..c eO'" ::IQ.Ci. C)EE coo :=00 Q) ~ JJ) ~ "w C 'tl::J'" >ooE '-.c c o '" ~ .,- '" III .0 > '" '" 0 " '" 0> (.)0- ca~ ~ .S rn 0 row:: t.c.. '" - c o CJ)'- ~c- o .- c -~Q) rJ) .~ E '" - '" ","'- "_ Cf) Q) > Of> 0> e"'C c a.. cu"(ij .. ~ ::J U)oo __ .c I J z IZ .0 ~ ;r "'- <0 <0 ~ ~ C'"l C'"l c-1 1M co !<O ~ !..-- o rn ~ .~ 0 ctl :=::-c :J o~o g> (/)"E C ro _ (J)._ 0 -(,)(l)XZ .-oc(-oe19 ~ ~ r::: "0 o.."E :J oC'iJQ)= mO'-Olf) -......u......oCLlrJ) .~:lDQ)C/JTI:Ec ()OCC-o~ Q) r:::... (1).- ...... a... ....J eGo.. E l..... CO Q).- -0 0 3: <D ..c Q." c: 0 0 .~ RE;Q)::::~ -0 ECSCLl t:(.)C'Gro~o..c Ol:3:mctlU~ .-.:.:: .r::. .---....... 0- m;: ......... ~ 0 E ....... ca "" c: oOo..~(/)o8 -CC'll"5~-o(J) <C.2>o::Jrnc: '''....'- '- c'- -0-':'::0."00-0 C r::: CD 0 c._ c: (].J;t:3:......~1aQ) ..cCD "O_-E ........"'l:JQ)Q)o"ijcu UJ CD::; ro >,-- ~.cO(l.l~cno ._........ '- = c >" :Jr.o 0:9'-0 Q)"C c.. 10 ~c: ll::c'EEo.J!~ CDQ)_E=rr E--o'-Q) ID<(~=-uE.;: :<l 5 s:i '3 >-. ~ E " o C'U .g E Z .< I Ii I , , c ~ ~ m ~ C'"l C'"l CD '" ,f; ::J u; "'E OOU) '" '" e l..... 5: . en 8 0 o.8~t:=::J;; ..c........mOtf.l.!! jgS-Q.~ij ..ooQ)f<1>'U) .!9u>-:::c tf.lo"OO ca .........- <1> C c .! a3 .8O~~Eca tf.l"'C <1> Q. <1> ~ ...... ca I... 0.- = c CD ca <1> E Q) .... E Q) EtVo-gtf.l..c -cQ.uca::J:t: c.- -c::: Q) J:: C c: c E~u.2~~ m....c'niQ)n ......caQ)=..c:.;:; ~;=E--'" ......Q)mcuc - >.- E Q)CI)'QCDrn :9"0 .......c8 ~cu~2Q) '- tV c.......c II) 0.= Ql Ql U::J .8f::J:9Ci;"'C 'O:::JQl>..cc Q).....:::e1U~ 10 co c o...c ~ "E 0 .8 3:.~ OQ)5"'C~iiJ .. E:.;:; Q) CO.- c~.!9rn~n - 0.'- Q) co co ;;:-EE'-> ___:..=0 Q).~ ~ .0 ~ ;;! " " - VJ a >> 1'0 E 1'0 - " E " '" " " .2 " 'i: "( '0 c..J a " " .u '0 ;; ,. 00 " u ~ j! 0 " 0 " bl) " "- ~ bl) '0 E - c..J -< '0 " " ..!< u ~ " ~ -5 ..D " " " VJ "0 0 ~ " E 0:: u ;2 0 , ;::! ~ "5 ..!< " .c 0 0 w.J N 0- u E " .2 0.. VJ VJ N '" , " "" u " " .~ E u < - 0; Ul < ,. - ,., 0- ::> ..D " U >. .~ 0 --l " G3 " .S< "0 "- 0.. E g 0 0.. ! co '" ';: -' .2 ~' LL '" ... z 0 ., N ;= C'"l '" ;glr:: -' N I"r ... I . . .:. ,0') C'"l ~ I~ ~ <Ii r-- ., , c ... '" en I~ N , '" I~ 0 0 '''' N i_I... .: I~ U '" co " 'u co ~ " >. co 0 e en := f N :c , '" '" 'iji 0 .0 0 '" .3 N '" - .: ii Of> c U 'u '" e C. '" co OJ ... e > "C f 'w e c '" a '" ai N .c - e ",-" ~ .- ... 0 a." III E E '" III e ool!! ;;:: " ~ ... '" 'O~ '" 'tl '" '" ... , '" .~ U '" ,f; ::J .- 0 erE 0 '" '" 0 N '" 0:: c .: '" 0 '" ..:-:.. U ~ <( ~~lD -a E E .... 0 ::J E CUl...'O'- CD - c.e :;-'ai~Q) 11).....: Q)..c ro-Ci5~..; Q) g' l...._ C '0.- 0"0 CD ~-g:::Q)E u::JC,!CD .~ - m c CD o Q.) ~ tV ....C) ......'0......... c'OO::J tV IV co ...... 0.:::J- _::J C) tV 0.0 ~ Q) g <1> ".-..0_ >cn'O......... '00 C c tf.l,! cCD..2::JC ~ E l... E.;: Ql CD 0 tI) 0 Ci>c"E_ EO Ql Q) C o5.EE"'E U E E ~ Q)'- Q) 0 CD ..c->l...f ........s: 0 0.C) "'C.- 0> E tV Q) 0. ,-._ .~ ~ Q) ro C 5-- -5 ~ CD ",oOo.E O:::CD"':~Q. '::i ~Q).2 LO"OOIl)CD roCDmQ)> -J:: >.z CD "-uQ)_"O ~cn'Ooro .n -------- '" - N C'"l ! 0 ..;- "" ,..;- ..;- ..;- 0 1 ..;- ..;- .~ N ~ ~ 1 - Q) o c "';; 'ni.Q Rro ::J B ij"OO :::J":;: Q) eo.o e ~ 0 '" 0._ '" "C c ..c CD.Q -...- ~ .. u o Gi 2 ::Cw c . c OJ Of> 0 E"E U ",,,,- CEo '" OJ '" E>1ii roo"'Caj cc..wu .!:QE:5c 0.'- co -0 co .!; .!; Q)''t: Q) "0 "~g-o>o i}uffi>- Q)-...c..o a::: 0 U'O ..~"'C Q.) . ::J c..c ~"O co.~ ~ Q) U) li SQ..n 2 E m tf.l rn 0 -Q)'O U M:5 g-~ --- .8 '" ::; Of> ="E 2", ~ E .e~ C .- 92 Of> '" .- ~ ~2 ~ C a.", Z'E Ci~ e 0 ~e 'tl .~ e_ '" rn ~g .2' U l!!_0f> .. C > 0 On "'''' '" Of> :g .~ <(,f; J.8 to'" -~ '" OJ -.c M'16 .-..-- - ..;- " :0 '" 2 ~ 'Q.bI) 0.8 <.c ~u ~c II .8 <.2 ~ '" ZV1 1:1 CD 1:1 '" CD_ CD", ZCD -E '" CD CD_ EW -g&j CD E < ... ... ,., .~ " B " ." "" '" .8 is is "" '0 '0 , 0.. 0.. ... Ii; ... " '" " ".- - 1:Ij ~" -;;u.1 " " ~:a " " ... " "'", bJJ - 0 >=' "0 0- 0- " '" 0 E '.c ....:l .:: "'.c: _0.. _0.. " ou " U "'- " ,., " ,., ~ 00-8 il'" :E CD l!! ~ ~o. ",,- 0 N.g~ :E(t) ~O- 1:1 CD ",0- ",0- ~ ;;;....C::lJ,.:l 0", 0 1:I.c: o => o => u " <,! ,,<I) ,,<I) u .- " ~.". - -< '0 a X X .8 .8 0.. ~ a a > '@ '@ 0 0 0 0 0 " " 0 0 0 -< -< . -< < z z en u: -", ....'" "'0 .... .- - ~ ea CD_ -.- 0.0 ea .c: o <XI o o N , . o o N en u: .... '" .... ~ CD g .c: o o - .. ~ '" ea .c: o .. :; 'tl ..>. .c:o o c III l!! - ... c :> CD 0 E 5 .. 0 ~ E ~ ... o.Q) E'";' ,_ Ol c "i.Q - 'Q.. co ea", 0" En ~ 0 s-g Co", e CIl o.c: -c CIl Q) E "'E", .~ E (j) :>"'>. 0'>'" "'o- cr: C) ai "lii E "'0", to .Q 0) mQ)ro x;; ffi ~~ E Ol C - 'w o o .c: o '" .c: .~ .c: ~ >- .0 0;- m m ~ ~-ci ... Q) "'- .00. o 0 - '" o CIl Q.", ",.0 moo '" :> 1:IE .. '" -- .. c -'" .. E 0", ;..:..'- <tl 'S XO' <0'" -... '" ,0; c o 0. :>... ",2 '" CIl ::l ~ ..c .2 "':0 .0:> 00. -0 c~ '" 0 E", ~i5 "'''' '" CIl '" C :J~ "'''' ffi.! a;'Q. ...Q. :> :> :;'" .... ~ '" .. :E1a '" ~ "'.... .~ 0 g.~ Q)'- . a:::EUl ;....:....tG .~ ~:;~ ->0 ~ra~ '" _c ,f!e ",'t: .. '" 0- o CIl ....~ 00l _c C .- ",-t E 5! '" > IDe '" c ~ ,2 ",10 c> ~;v ~ ~ Be.. ,2", _.c: ~;0 - OlLL C ~ - ",:>1'-- EO'" ",ON .= c: oq- :JQ)~ cr1i) rJJ ~ :J c ",E:;; ~=~ . . .. ij:: -e'" ~jU -0", ~CJro '" '" .~ ro co m ..c'- C,)c 3: ~8..QQ) .8 3:,-,- +-'"'0 ....... uOQ)Q>Q.)c Cui Q)om-E..cctl :::J+-< 10 .~ 3: >.1- Q) '0 0 ai o .0 ...... (,) R......(ij r.ri ~c+-' E c:: c:"'O"'O.- Q) 0"'0 ::Jmo2CDa.Ecc:: Q>-+:Jum om ..a Q.::c; ..Y:! c c5 g--o E o ~ m Q) >.=-= - (/) co ~ a.,b (/) o...g ~ c- c: 0."'0 Q) c... c... Q) Q.) 0 CD~C::(/)::SQ.)"'OEc E '- m ffi (/) "0 O>"C ,Q ~~ IV 0 '- '- ::J c:: C +-' -...... _ Q.)_._ Q.) c... ii~o-gmg-gE.g 1.,:>.!.m3:--- co G)-O ......um - co.... c"'O en c:..c.....o ftlCQ.OQJ::J'-_u ~.Q>-~t5Ef/)::J~ .!! g>'Q. ~.~ c ~ U) c .Q'-Q,me..!2:.= .Q.) l'a'"O:::IrJJc...a.oV)::s -Q)fI)cC/)~~~g Om 0...... '- 0..,- a. ~O:::O~a.- QJ"R.-UQ)3:a.::J<l> ..c:J~C:Q)>.a.(/)..c :;;c:>rnEa.~Q)~ CD CO Q) l!J 0 a..... +-<' 0 '~o.2: O+-<' ~2 ~ c ::J - CD C co"> 0 0" en CO '0' cu .... :> Q) :0::: cu..cc.... CU">>co a:::c:Ua.Emro:';:::;.~ ..:-:..o~~E~c~E ~ E CO ~ ~ Co ,Q Q) ;:: coCX)~::J 0 (]) ar.:!:~ _..-- +-<' (/) Q) >...... CO +..< '" ,0; >. .0 '" '" '" '" l!! '" '" CIl '" 2 '00 - o E . 2c '" .. ~E "'.!!! .c:CD -;.. _0 '" .. >.Q. .. '" ~ ; "Q. 100 ~'tl '" c '" .. '" c "'0 <:(; .. eve Xu ~e iii .il! -- ",.- :> ~ E~ - -", mea E>- "'Q. QjQ. c '" 0"' .- ... m,! .~ ca "2~ 0_ 0" o e -0 CIl'- -0> c .. '" ~ E.c: C:~ Q; ~ > C 00 Ol'- iDm _ c c'- .- '" '" (; .c: 0 I- 0 '" ~'" -'" .c:... -'" -", ~CIl '" '" '" ... '" '" CIl .8 '" .. .. ~ .. Q. J: '" "E .. ~ .. - '" 'tl c .!!! .. ~ :> ~ '" ~g>> '5.C;; 0'", '" 0 O::J: '; Q) ~:c "'ea ~"E -0 ~il: S.. c '" o '" U'- . Q) :rl E Eo.'" ...",.c: o - 't:"'- Q)2 frl 0."'_ =0 '" >. ... .oco. >.CIlO CD_; ~ -: c :> .. 0 '" ...- ~ '" en ca';; .! CD e oeo. ...- Q..~ 2 "'.. CIl ,,0:> CDeg en Q,.U =:Eco co en ~ ",1:1:> '" ~ '" ... ea c '05 ~ '" 0'''- ",-", 0::'":::> ,,'tl E tri C - -..!c "'-'" :::=::::ca (/) ~ ~ '" ~ "'... - ~ Q. g o '" o J: - .. E CIl .~ .c: .!!! :0 (1l en '" '" o c CIl c '" (; c CIl 13 CIl c '" en :> 2: ~ ~ S " :0 '" .~ ~ o..~ 0.", -<-= ~u iQ II -8 -<3 ~ '" ZVi " Gl " Gl_ Gle:: Z.. -E e::.. Gl_ ~~ e::m Gl E < <D >> >~ >> >> .<::::: <n .:= on :'::: on :<:::: V) - :-:::If( - on - ~, - on '0 'g 00 .- , '0 '0 .- , """ """ """ ,,~~ '" "0 u...9 "0 '" '" "0 Glo::o bI) 1'-<, 1'-<, bI) bI) 1'-<, '0 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ '0 '0 ~ ~ III .c:: -l '" cO '0 0 cO -"! '" '0 0 Ill_I'-< ~ " ~ ff...... 0 I " I 0 0 I "..0 0 "" u "" 0 0 "" " " E " - " " " - ".c::", "" Vl Vl ;;; Vl gi "" "" Vl " <~"" " '" " " " " U " u .'-! S ...: :..=: ;:; ~ V :..::: ~ -< ...: - '" .0_ .0 _ .0 _ .0 _ ~~ o:~ O~ ~~ I "- j . -< < Z Z ui u: -Ill Me:: <DO .-- - ..... Gl_ -- 0.0 .. .c:: o '" C E -g .~ ~ c ~ Ci1? "C :;3: f '=::-0 CO CJ :::J c: o c. (.) ('\] 0'- 'i:- NJ: am I en ns.~ "Ct-c -c;'!::: g ~ t: ~ ('Ill:: ta Q) . CD co en cn- CJ>. . en ns= u.. _ c. m C") 0 f/) C U) (]) c: Q) ~(/) CDE ... :J Q. C . CD"Ons COUl C ffi ~ 3= "5; :g ca _ ta 0 C (l) ..c aJ Co = Q) C:3 o U._ co{/) o ~ ~ 0 co .9- _ >-._ ..............J:: cnQ)~ "DC(/) ~>tG ~m"E c~ ._t'm co> >03: ca: U.!! Q) a. CD ..c c f/I a:::.s (j) OO"C ......:.., en 0> ~; sQ.~ c w- "'0 CJ)'c un; -:::J 0> -------.00 0:; ~Q.)(/) _... -.-..c rn >-------- .8 Q) .0 ... e:: Ql E Ql 0; III Ql ~ 'u .. ... o o .<: " III .!:! :a :s 0. 1l a " '" u; :> :2 3 c Q) E Q) Qi .!!l E N ~ '" .S "0; .- Q) 1) 0 ~ C a", Eu; a E .:= :> ... 0 CD .= > 0 ,- C ..- ~ '" t <(Q) o :Olii -" " C C :> "''0 -Q) ~'" -a N_ ~m o Q) '" - :> c" o C :.;:; co .. - " III o .. -Ql o ~ " .. Q)1ii -0:;::; :> C OQl c"C ';;'0 ~Ql Q) ~ .0 0 - .9CD~ "'E ~.!! EO; Q).- .s:: ~~UJ a~,., 0." tnwc: :;;o~ Q) 0 ... ".c::Ql C " E [~ CD x 0 '" w,,'" .. 0 (/) 0)'- (5 xCii 0 N".c :::...2 ~ Q) .cc -;:5 S30 0", "0. C Q) Q) "E ~~ '" a E5- Q) E "0 .- >0 a a ~.<: 0-0 .8'" ~-g c '" Q) '" ~o ~ a Q).c > u a'" '" '" ",' -Q) ~ca. a- '" -aE "0" '" ~ 0 c .-.- 0 &ni:e Q) "0 "0 0::-6 ..:-:...(ij U :SCii~ -,,:> ~a.J:J _ "'- Q) E o " o .. 0. o "C .. ~ o ... ~ :s "C Ql .c:: " III '" .c .!!l ~~ '" E Q) Q) .903 <('" l).!!! o!: ""0"(3 ~~ "50 O'a Q).c a::1;l :-::-0 -:0 N OJ :='a o a .c u '" ." :0 :> a '" 1l a "0 '" .8 1! :> ~ ~ .2 ,., - Iii " Ql Co "0 Q) .c .~ -E :OQ) 19 E '" Q) wQi ..:-:.. >. :..=:;J.~ C'\J"u =-~ '"3' Q) ~ '" '" Q) 0. ~ a OJ w.co > _ '" Q) 3: ~ "0_ o 0, ~ ;m.3 ......::cm c '" c Q) c '" E'm .~ E 1i) en Q):JU > '" Q) 01-0 "'o~ (ij-a. u"'-o a Q) c -:gm '" > w 0 cri g>D-c ~ -5'~ 8:.c:Ul c 3= 6 w= _ 0 -c- 5.9 ~ :w (/).!Q g"; ';;; (/) >.,:=: ~~ U) Q) ~ ~ ~Ec -,-,-Eg> <,,>00 :=..P ~ '"3' Q) ~ c~~ "'a~ a-~ 0-0 Q) -Q)> ~ C: 0 Q) Q) '" uU)~ .8.!Q .~ '" '" Q) c ~ U) Q)","O E Q) c c.c '" ~ ~ '" ~ U) .~ o <l>."!::::::: Ol::JU rn~~ O<l>~~ Q.c=r-- rJ).~ -g ~ Q) .c 0... '<:::t ~~<1>~ ::J " - 15 C") 01:-:> '" o ftJ O"co C"C <1>..- W c: a1 . -:s '" c:o.c<l> O.c .-:: Q) :WQ,)3:U) g.~:o 00 III ~ Q) ~ ~ Ql ~ ~ Q,) (/) U);;:O Z" 0 -ftJQ)..- . . .c .0 ....... :;;;r...= >< :=..p.~ ~ s ~ co <Dgr-- r:::a:r::: M;:M <">0<"> ~1!:~ Q) .c f- "C Ql Iii Ql 0. Ql ~ .!!l <D r-- r-- ~ <"> <"> <D ~ >- " - c . -Ql"O e::2 Ql :s Q) E"Qi QlC"O Ql 0 '" ... 0 ._ g'o N 0- ...c:: C " " 0 O(/):;:; -~u ~.E ffi Ie IIJ..Q ,._....... ::J (/)a3U) OEo ~~u " :> C III 0' Q) .~ ~ ~ :eU)....... ::s~rn o.~" Q) -0 0 z~.;n u 0.; Q) ~ 0 ~-~ .::; ~ c. 0'.0 _ Q) '" :s O::~9 ..0..._ -0.0. ~mo <D r-- "" "" ~ ~ 0) :0 '" .2 ~ a,CI) o..~ <-" ~u i c II .8 <.2 ~ " zV; '0 <J) .. <J) '0 W ..... ..- ~ '0 ..", '0 Z.. '" -E .9 "'.. ..- <J) EW '0 -g~ W W .. e: E w <C :;;; () () >> c c .~ Ir) w w - on wE wE 'OJ .- , '0 '0 '0 "00 W W W z~ .c:w "'0 ~w "0 "-, Ol Ol Ol _w <II..c: ~~ '0 '0 '0 o e: o e: <11_ '00 w w w "0 "'0 .... 0 I ~ ~ ~ ..0:.;:::; ..0:';:::; ...'... -" '0" 0 0 0 '" '" " ~ e: e: e: >>-e >--e 'O..c: r/J c: <C~ " "" "" "" .20 .20 .~ E U U U - 0. - 0. - " <{ <{ <{ o <J) o <J) .D _ tLe: tL e: ~cu '" '" ~ ~ f- f- . ~ <C < - :z: Z z ui u: -<II M", "'0 ~,- - .... ..- -- Q.U .. ..c: U E - ~ OC,g <{ e: . W 0 <J) (/)CJe ~oQ) -~E o ~~ -e (tJ._ cocuUJ::l oo.(/)o- O(/)~~ N ro 0)....... ..t - c: c o.?:-..... Q) o+:;;cE NCala> ,{J E (j) ~._~ en u.. .9 Q).~ M ~O~ to C ~ 'u 'r"'" ::s (,).m ~O(/)O ,:::Ugo CVi.c..a-c .cCJ::Jo o ra c. (/) CI) (/).2 .sm~:a co E.~ 5- !!!'ii'O ~o..~~ C'IJ"UQ)o .c Q) Q) C\I 0.: c 3: "<J) w g-wc OC Ol W .. ffi~ ~-5.9 OC <C w ~ -- 00 ,g L.~ (,) ro Q; U) c...~ .~ ~ (:; j3c5 ::s 0.- c..;:' c.. E ~ E e fti ~ ->w '0"- 2m~ o."E Eg,o w~_ ~~ (1) <J) e: " .~ ::J:E ........=c e: '" 0 ".c: U o <J) ~ U_ _ ~"'w C\lm:5 -EE~ 'O..w ~ iii.S .- III E > .. ~ e;;2 Q..::Q) ..:--:...(,)"0 .......0 --~ co ..... ~ M M to ~ (f) Q) u: -g'Ut----E - Co Q.) groN~ "; co v ~ .......CC"1c: .......oooa> ~ ~ c t: E ~ ~ ~ Q) 0 Q.) C -Weo Q) ~;,::: 0 (ijQ)Q)-o _ ~ '0 W ~ IV (/) .: o (/) ro :J u <l.l - rr _:=:(/)Q) 0........1: ..... c.8em Q.) "'0 't en E w w '" Q) fIJ 10 -Ill ~ " ~ .- w,. '0 5-.0 SJ 0 Q) =.S.c ~ .~ -c ~ "0........ 0= crn3:u co.c - Q) a.;.~"O xQ)o"'C W -- CD <( -'-'.al'E- ~roE~ --""'0-- ~1iio::S co " ~ o co ~ M M to ~ 3: w Ole: .S: Q) " ~ <J) W .~ (/) ro .9.8'0 ...." Q) .2 ..Ill U ~ e: 0.= co ~ c. " WQ.<J) :.a. ==.~ o.<J)_ " .. 0 00.$ tV ~..~ 2~~ "'..w 3:_.c: :5~;:' 'j: g-.o c"O~ 0...0 ;oJ" m ~~~>. ::::J :J > U CI) (I) ro c C C Q) ro OQ}.oQ. 00_ :::J "O.....::u Q)~;: g "3 E c- C"'<VQ)O mQ.EOJ cr 0> a. 10 .. coo (U:OQj~ ::::::~a;~ ~.o -0 0 <J> " ~ o ~ Q) w u"" '" '" Q.(i) e: ~ .- '" w W .0>- 0'" ~e: III '" :8:5 "- ~ =w u.c: ..~ .... '" ~ "'- o III ,- .. - .. .. .. 1::>- o . Q,M .-=: III e: E c: .- L- ea :5 0> ....- c... -3: _ Ol -e:e: ea 0 .- -oug .~ 2 ~ &00'0 <U5- C:::o~ ;"':"'-0 U W ~ ~'O 0. -e:o. ~::J m e: -.!'! ;;= a. :G C co .- .- >.'-=: .9ffi~o~ cn..cu:BJ!! w ~ w ~ --:;;::J.....'-C ""e:a.::Jom Q).- 00:0:; OJ '-UUCCOL- :'!::::wcootm > oo+-, (/).- CD co a. C mm..a 000> Ci.~=ccE wQ)mm~c.. o..a-C '-..... 0 x UJO)'-Qi 0> in Q; ~.E > ....E>E-w C .- lO"O 0) -m....._a> E~~cc'- 00)0)0"0 ~ O..c: E:.;:: C '-..c: L..... 0 m ::Jor-EQ>_ cr (/J 0) 00 = ~ w>..a'E .2 co 0 ::s .- t)'D ~ 0) (/J C c::JmCij.92 0) 0....... 0..... L- t:-ococ::J ::SceD-mc gmE<t:~m o co... '- c: o 0 .Q ...... ::J ,- :0=; 0) C a.z OJ m > 0) .- ~-ewE63: .. g.-guli.-g ucn,-cQ)+-' -cuE Q) u '" -mc xU :!..bcucow..Q >- u . '" e: ...!'! .. 0. .. " W u.~ '" <J) o e: u W .c: ClW '" ~ ._ 0. cE .. 0 .. u Clw ".c: o~ ....e: 1Il'- "'0 C W = -0 .. ::J '003 .- e: " .- ClW '0-" .~ .9 ::J III 0'", W 0 OC .- - ;...:..c. '0" -u -,. e.. U; <J) t:::J>;.m w "2ECl~ .0 cacn4>>COo....._ 1::c-c cn" o ~ 0 cn ::J 0 o:.o::;_:.o::;wEc c.o..cn 0.-0 ~ 0Q)4>>0>01-I- ",u>uEO" f ~"C;; tTI w 0 g -wc- roLL 0 U..c: CD -. . U w......s::: en E.~ c -5i 0) l! 8 2 ~.Q ~EC.+:iCijCijrn mcEC.(/)ct ~wo""''''S< :gEu~..c"O(;) oo~taCDOCc mC. ::JCOm ..cEt::CD(/Jcob .......- 0 :5 iii rn co C '- c...... (l) woc.o'_'OSJ E.....::s o)>.c cencnCD2..c:.;:: '- ~"'C ~ ~ "C ~ ~~;e-oo~.Q 0-0 ::s>.oen O).-.s::: c.+-' c..W _::J_ =a."C m 0)";; m :0 ::J 0 Uo W :>.s::: 0 en..... ...c--E '- ~-cm cO - - CD _ a> o'~ ;...:..000-0:0:;.... O)C'-E " "''0 -oen TIt t+:ic2co2 _ c. 0 Co'- a. 'S ~~P"t:Soo:gg? ->(a>c::Jcoo !:e.m.ccaE.bu <l) :D " .~ ~ 0..;:9 0.- -o::l! -u ~C It .9 -0::3 ~ " zVi ." Ol ." Ol_ Ol e ZOl -E eOl Ol_ EW ~~ Ol E < ."j' .. 0 1O.c 10- .... ... ... ."Ol .".c <! . ~ Z ui u.: .10 Me "'0 ~- - ... '" ..- -- a.u '" .c U >- - D'O rJ..<gJ!! Q)co. ~ Q) 0 "'E'O c '" .Q ~ en m ......-.- o a.:::l...... Q Q) O"'c NO Q) Q) I X I- E · (J) Q)"C (;) >. tI) c Q U Q) Q) Nc5E ~~1Uro LL=SQ)U co;gE~ U)81ii~ ~ :J, ;5EO:: 'l::""",<l: =moW catOn> ~ON..c o a. _..... . o (/)"-c1i5 - ffi >- Ql co ......-S..c:- ~r-"" i= ~ coo.8on ftI Q.l I- - U J:: rn.Q~ 0 o c: 0..0 W o Q)N > ~.~..--~ ~ (j) >..~ ~-~~~ c Q) Q) E .cQ) :::UJ o N c .0 It)Z >-'" ot:: .- 0 -0. o '" a. c ~ Q) Q) c .c 'E.~ - 1-"0:5(1) J!! o'~..c Q).c - "0(/)"00) o ~ .$ .~ ..... :t:::u cnzEWu) 'Eu..Q~5 OC'Cl:::lx~ CJc.C/)Wa.. l!E~cD~ C:"--1OX 'm:5 ~u Q) c:;:; E g-'E'il ,- '" ns ~~c'c Eo '- Q)"- oa.8EE .....~Q)CllQ) cm'-wu (l) '- Q) CI) Q) E;~c:S c: --..c: Q) (/) wE:::Ew >"c 0 Q) 2:: o._~>o ~Eme~ rJ ~ E E:O o E .- '0 -~::J-O ~OCl)~..c .::..- <:( c..~ :J"- ctI '- O"I-'"QtJ..c: Q)Q.)Q)-- a:::....c..cttl~ ..... u ::J 0 .. Q) ro co <03: ID c...... _:>.....ro..- Q) ::'c -Q) .2E ~.c .E.!Q '0:0 Q) '" 0)- '0 '" Q) Q) -<l: ~2 Co -tt- <l: _ t- e C ,0 013)00 - E ' 10 CD ai (1) .~ tQ)>zO) 8.ns~"O Q) Cl)c(l)Cm cta.....COlo... ~E~cU5 ~ >0 g <V <u aguE:5 CD C'lJ E 0 ~t::~~~ E::::I:JO..... t:: (.) (/) rn 0 e c '" C'OOW(ijQ.E g- u .8 g"_ o g _- >. IV'- C Q.) C _Q)..c:ro :5~E~J!! -5oQ.wC'O .- C. 0 u rn 3:CI)Qi~:E 5;~a.E .- ........... c 0 10 - ...... "-..... ~m==~Q; ~rn'EC'IJ..cE cE'w-2ww om....... '- 0)...... ocoEmo~ "00> -0....... Q)'- 0 c:..::.:: U) .= :g a.19 0 (ij 5-"001/)3:"8 Q).9~~:Q E 0::: "- ra:.- ::J "- .- 0 CD 2:: 0 Q) t:.--~:a ~~E .-<: Z >- o e Ol ... ... :J " e o " E ... Ol 't '" Ol- e 0 o 0 _.c '" ~ - ... o 0 c_ g E 0." 0- '010 '" >- 10 '0_ Q) e i= Ol .Q E <(~ ":-:"ra: '" c ;=:'" ~E -<: Z. o ro ~ '" C"i- <Dc Q)~ Ol :J . E '" '" Ol -~ 0> en o _S ~ ;-gra: cl'lE '" '" >- E", " E -~ r:: ~ -0 ~ o c :J O)cO - 0 e CUz 0 00" .Q2E -cu)... Q) c Ol ~o-+t QOOl =Q)r:: <(00 _c- e Q) '" .2 E 0 'UE::: Ol 0 0 .. 0 Q) oB i=_ :J Ol '" '" z(u"'E - > '" ~e~.! ----a.(QU) m~.~ ~ '0 Q) 0) '0 Q) 3' o c "" o <( ." e '" l'5 B~ ~~ .2'0 ~~ w~ .~~ CO) o c z -;;: ~ e - 0. ~ E Q) .- '0 C i!' '" :J '" o-i!' Q)O) et:: e - 0. c_ 00 +=- " 0 Ola. 10 Ol ~ll: Ol- z:J: ~'CG -... ~o. - a. ~< '0 Q) 0) '0 Q) 3' o c "" o <l: >-- '" c i=2 '0",>- cu.- - o~= ~0.Q OU:;:i -Q)'" 'ODo. ro.... E '0"'0 C :J " '" E ~ ooE~ ~ .! -00 -- U) c 2: >- 0 Q) CJl 0 en_oo o~ E:J -0 ~ E en Q)"''O -Ol~ -- '" 10" "'e'O .c:-cc .... 0 (Q 0 E .c, en ;: Q) CD -.~ E-en"C Q) f! "E ,! .= - CU... ::J en -c :::J rr cP c '- ~.c~c -"'.. -gcI-O "0 aO.!!. -ceno"C <(~LLra: ;"':"'~.c:.c 00....;:: :=-~ -~ ~ ;>, ~ <n :.=v) .- , "00 "'0 u.., ~~ '00 ,g I " ~ ~ - " .~ E - " .0 _ :j[2.J 0.. '" c o li o o c >- o e Ol ... ~ :J " e o " '0 o .c " 10 '0 i!' :J 0- Q) et:: o o .c Q) 0 D'" og> ;-00 ~ :J "'>> ~D Q) C > Q) <+=:.::::.. ~ . ~:! '" '" >>'" 0.Q c Ol Q)." ~ 'i g :~ 0'" oii) 0:0 o e . -5ra:o C/)~Q.} C/) II) vi ~ II) Q) -- CD c 5-;- a Q) '" N a::c~ o c ~"O m ~~-g M~2 :Scorn cry ~ - ro .~ " '" u.. ~ '0 " U ~ .:! .0 " 0.. " ::0 oj .~ ~ P-.gf <~ ~u ii:> II .3 ....E ::::: oj zCil "tl Gl "tl Gl_ Ole ZGl -E c. ..- EW -g~ .. E < Q) .qV"; ;>-, ;>-, ;>-, V"; .~ lr) ."!:: VJ .t:: V) V"; -V"; -V"; :.:::~ - V"; "tlj~ '000 .- . "" "" .- . Uoo Uoo Uoo "0 "0 " "0 " "0 CD 0 I .... .... OJ) .... OJ) .... III .c <>: ~<>: ~<>: "" ~<>: "" ~<>: cO cO " cO " cO (1)_ 0 ~ ~ !! I ,g, 0 , 0 , 0 , "" 0 "" 0 "" "tl Gl E U E U E " U E " U - "tl.c " Ul " Ul " '" Ul " '" Ul iU <~ E .~ E .~ E U .~ ::: U U E " - " - " ..: - iU ..: :..::: Q) Oil .0 _ .0 _ .0 _ .0 _ o:~ o:~ o:~ o:~ . < ..: ..: Z Z Z en u: -.. Me "'0 ~- - ~ .. ..- -'- ",0 .. .c o C o :a o "0 '" C co'" oE 0'000 ~ ai.~ ~Em o ","0 Nc:5 ''''0 ~ Ci..c u.E", MO~ U)~m ~C'" G;: o.~ ~~C: ca E ~ c3~.8 0'" '" _"0'" . .!! rn !"'C ~.S ~ e E u ftI ._ "'- .cwo o - ': C ~.Q ~1ii M'~ ~ E --:..::::: "0 .!!? C '" "0 '" .0 .l!J >. u.e;- '" "'- Eo O-~ -oEo.. ~.c::: rou CJ C ecnC1>o 0._ E 0 a.. 0 a....c ro _ 0 0 c cQ.i lJ) Q.)l>>>..c EE",'" o.~"O 3: o ::::J Cll (I) - C1).c: co Q) ca........ (l) > CD l... I- '" E '" '" "0 >", ~ '" u 0" ;:.- -"Oo~ C oj:.s::::. (]) ,2_.- rJJ ........u"OlJ) ~'i: Q):J .- _ en 0 Ci.!! :::J :J g." .~ .Ql o C ~C Z..CJo .ceu ". -+j' CD 0 Men::....... ~~~-g M-;C~ ~ O.c _~ CJ (/) .8 1ii :J E ~ '" o..c .Qo <1>:.;:::; > '" "'Ol -0:';:; "'E ~Q) "0 "0 ",.- ~f) '" ~ :.;:::; a. ~.8 "'- .oe o Ol -E >.;:: g E ~ E ~ 0 BU-a C Ol C Oe", ~:OE o e '" 0'- '0 .c-"", u "'.c "'-- '0 'ii 0 '" Ol- ;: Ol '" 0-- =m~ -0:"'0 .. Q) :e Q):J 0 :':::::::00. M"'O ~x~ _"'0.. Q) C .;;; .!!? .c u '" .E '" C o ~ o , C e 00 :.;:;;; '" .. g.EJ .- - q~ ~! m.. ~.c '" .. E' :J.! C .. we o ......::e -0 ~o.. M2 :::'0.. '" C .~ ~ .Q", 0"0 ';;ro i~ Q)....... .. :55~ -OC o E :J '" '" E g (/) E .S f; 8 "O=~ "'"tl_ -g!c: :J CJ 0 --"0 "''''", ",:J '" "'Eo =........ c... c ~ ffi.!; .~ ;Ec-ac \U c: 0 c: C'l] c: 1....._ ctI a. o Q) t) - >< z> (QI_ (l) m 0 >< 0 _ o OJ Q) c: c: .goor...o.Q moo:gn ::=.QCD:9E .: Q).! Z en N:5_c:c: ~ui~88 ->. 0.. M"'E ~ S:._ . . C o "" :iQ :J 0- U '" "0 C .!l1 '" g "0 ~c:g-oQ) ........mcffiw coU)1Q (/) ..c:'- 0. -- ....- ........(/) cm -occnQ)> ~ 8.s K CD "5 c: "E 0 ~ CiomWI Q) (/) Ol > ~ c ~ OJ ui w..mc"'OQ) Olo.O~:E 5 .= ~ -a ~ -"'Ec", o -E .... ro ~ C:CD,EcO (/)(/)c:CDO....... .- ro.- E..c: c: '=::..c CD c... ~ CD l-aroouE -ro..cai:=~ "eO (/)>.0-- .!.o-aw:J5- cu- c:-a o.w Gi g ro (/)-'0 ~ "en 5"~ (/)~ 5 (/) n ~ -g "E .- -a CD u CD .- U c: 'o.m c: ~ curo....-wo en"'" 0.0...._ _c: c: O::J . ." CD o..c t5 ro siE~~2$L o>E~ u"'" 0> -Q)::J:= (/)_ .-.. > 0..0 ~.-.. ~oo:Jc~ _0>0..0..__ ~ .E c '" E >. '" 0.. ~ o - e Ol E . - '" '" '" 0 CJ :J_ l: E Ol Ol > o.. '" Olo.. -"tl:J ij'to- U E'- e c: a8 ~ e CD .-- eo >.- 0 OE.c "'o..CJ (ij.!cn UOl.c O"tl_ ...J .- """:" 5 ~ ..... Ol 'Ol CJ !::.... s::: ",:J.. -"tl= -0lCl. ~uE -~ 0 ~ c.u t E.5 E 0 Ol o..- o.. 0.- C'G !!:.;cn .. e . '" 0 ~..c:.. co",.. .-...- CJ 0>:0 ._ -",- M'- C. ~"'Cl. -"'''' ~ '" t:. Iii.c u_ 0,- - :;: "0_ '" C :;: '" o E = '" '" '" roO> 5'" ",Iii "'u '" 0 :J"i:: "'''' c- co.s :Cc Ol '" - "0 Ol C - '" Olo.. C '" ~:J cO'" -~ 010 ::::", M_ ~'" -c ~E o.. ~ CUQ)-c E - ~ o.. 0 '" - 0 Lfc..Q ......wo "Eo -c.c "'~U -"'''' M'>CD ~O.c _ "'- >. CJ_ eo OlC_ o.. "0 C :;- <u CJ :J E s::: 2 a. o '" 0 u.....Q) _c> o '" '" OE"O .cc", CJm_ III > 0 roOm ..c 0>._ __c - '" '" uU"O .m..Q.... '" '" 0 ..c >. ro 1-..oE; -"0 ~ e",o.. .2 co. .! CD ro > E C 0", '" o.. - ~ Cl.o..", I,C)E-E Q"- .- oc'" N"'~ :><u..E ,. .0 '" cu..... ._ z"'''' - >. '" "" .......0 :2 g <u:=: :::=:: '" -E E M v. ~ ~"''''~ _..c:.o _ " :0 " _2 ~ o..gf 0.." -.;:"" -u i e- II .8 ..:B ~ '" zi15 ... CIl C ... '" CIl_ E ., C i Z., '" -E [jJ c., c CIl_ 0 EW ~~ ~ t ., 0 E a. 00 <C c ro ~ f- ...~ "0 Ul.c: Ul_ ..CIl ~ ~ ..... ....c: <C~ ui u.: -Ul <'>c COo ....- - ~<ll ..- -- 0.0 <ll .c: U '-- 2 - .g :; ~ (;j o '0 t: U ~ 0 '5E~ ..0 51::: U "O~ 'Vi e '5 Il.l Il.l f- Vl ~~c;Q ~~-g ::: - E ;2 ~.- .Q":::':=: u " <>: ;;: . <C - Z co o o N . .... o o N '" o Iii "'_'~ Q)"O "'.s:: 0 uoo.......E ID ._-"'0:;:::: (f) '::0'=3 ctI (1)- co~.~..c .- Q) -==..c I C >c .-0::: c:~Q)l1w<{ ocEoQ)w ;:;OCmElD ca '- a. .J::. t::oQ.lEoo....... co > .- - oo.oO):Jo o.E"'ooE", ~ .- rn .,g U') E coQ)o.......o:;:; .....c 0 WO Q) I-........-.......N..c ~jg ~..:--1i5 ~ffi.......~:E>.ro~ o en "'0 E"3 '- en EroSo-'o::; E.9.E~.8~8 :::J-o cv Q) '-0 0 :!: Q) ,-..c: ON '- ~ ctIW"i:: -Q) O'l :J (/) 0) Cl....-- > .~ (/) ....... 0"'0 >. (]) ag~-Q)"S-5 o () Cl.t:; {5 ~:.c 'O",EO=>-> CO ..c'- ::.c..o :> .81Ji~t)!9cc- o :J (/) :J ~ Q) Cl.l cE"E'EooEE a..l-rol-u~"'O ~o -g 0 E '3 ~ 100rooooC"E :='LL(;)u..:.o~m en u.: M co .... ~ ., ~ <ll .c: o o - Ul ~ " <ll .c: U ~ '" ~ '0 " OJ) '0 -" ~ o c -'" I";: , <>: :Z ~ '" Z .... <X) ~ 0') 0') .en ~ c c: .!Q ~ ro " ~ .e (l) :::J :J "5 1? c~"""'Q) ctl >..~ -E ~g~E a.~~ e o ro >,- "O_t15.. ro ro '" E vi II) c: a. ....... ro.Q E ~ a3 ..c: 0'1 a. Q) E ~~O)Q)"'O ro"'OErn~ .g- ~ ~ ~ E .- Q):t:: c: ro 5roCt'lQ.)c: E"t::'(/)Eco ~, C -0 D.. ct'lromffi'+- ~~EEo -- ro -0 co ~ :5 c a3..c: c :;:;QJEo~ gEroJ5rr Ulo.oC .~ ro >-~ ~wa.ro(l) oal'--oz N-o.E3c ~~"OOO CD -0 Q)..c c: Z c ni (1) .Q :: ~ .~ -~ :ffi <X) = E ~.- ...--c:.=QJ.E '--"._ Q) cn..:::: >- -" '" a..~ g '0 Dram >. -O....c:: 00-0 0 mmij -Uccn..cc .8mo 2~c~~ !'l "0 m 0.......... Q) en 0- - ..... o.r;!E (]) ffi:e -g -g (f) -g ~~ ~ &.~ ~ ~(])E~:G ......0 .c.... Cc (])"'c.. _"C('Q~0 >c.o cC:co 00)03 w::::sro.cc ~.~ ~ E .8 (i 0Q) ,Q '... '011..... C ......._ m c.)(f)U ......1>>0>- o Q) - W U _ ...... .- - (/) .- > .- -0 (l) E '000" 01:",00= ~rot- O)I>>-c<v '3 0 0 ro en ~ ctl -E rr~ 0 _g:; 'E ~ E <V -0 LL .... 0::$2. ~.c~Q)e -en ....r::- em c: C'::::S 00......._ ,- c Q. ,2E,2.2-g":cE t) co c. ~ U ro .9:! ~ lV I>>(QOol>>c:ij)3:~ Cl)Oc:NenO......>. u:i I,t)Oo -Il).iii>.t~c ON.-"'--o._ 0 Q) ctl Q) o -fti......o>cc..ooE ~::.2J~~~~ecu :> CD ~ E :>.c co o..Q) ffi ~J:lE E:,!~::I1ii g>,g E -- Q)Q)--Ec'z:::e::cu .. CD ... 0 .. E 00.. -- U ta -- .- Q) ..... c 'H~8~"'~_ E (/) ID e ..~-g:: _.......--.c.. ta.oo....J E E c . '" en Q) ~x (G -0 g, Q) oou<V~ ro~mm woo en ~ g- ID ~ ~ 00 " U a.. ~::::s c Q) U C) ~.ccc: _....... C'Cl._ jgcID~ c lV ...... 0 m-{;.3.c: '0>:::> - -- Q) ~ c: 0l::C ...... Q) c _ -E:.;:;;; o "C.~ ... mC:xo >CDID=:: e E ~ (G_ e. cu ....... (f) c.._ c w ro c: ro 0 -oQ).cC "'E-~ 3: c.V) V) ..Qo~Ec i<( "ii -= a 0 i .. ~ 0 .= ..~_ -:-coo i;::. .. -= .~ E 10- m 00= :::::::: cu ~ tv) .~ ~ g:'! :s -f-. I~ i~ -------L- ~ '" z " ~ c" '" u E 5 0.0 .9u '" .- > E '" 0 '0 c: '" 0 -0 ~ .. 00- .!.<ll -0 ro._ E~ 00 ::; "'- ,s 0 ~ <ll - .. -~ C <ll 0_ .;; f .:;: ::::s o ~ ... C'Cl u:i 0.00", 1,t)Q)= 0>0. 0-0. N~m >coe ~:.:: E zC:':: -"'", .. E ...... -<iuO --CCP 0"'0 ""EN ~mm ~ '" ~ '0.8 ,"'0 f m ~ '" '" '" c;~V)-E 2 ~ ]3 .~ ro -E E 6i .8 ':;: -g .r:: .....-0 Q) 0 ffi g! E c EO ro 0 Uo.CU c c.~ '" ro E '" '" cu .c .~ c >. 00 c <{ m C Q) -E1? E B c: ~ E .Ci) :D E g! .s:gog, 000 Q..ucm 1,t).2 ~ ~ gEE" N 0-- ~ :: 53 I>>UOo- Z I>> "5 Q) 0:: ::~ ~ ^ 0._ II) ~ :::::::: == CLl ~ti-E ~ o ~ <C Z ~ Q) ~ 0') 0') en OJ :0 '" ~ .2 <l) o..~ a.'" <C..c U ~ C II B <C-= ~ '" zif} ,- N '"' 'C III 'C 1Il_ Ill", ZIIl -e "'Ill 1Il_ eW -g&j III e < '" o o~ .r:::-" "N 'Cj'cn:;:- cuogai ::E..QE Cl)G,):JQ.l ......0..- "Ccu_w "OJ:: 0>. <;:c~ '';;' 0'- ._ U ~'" g-u.. -0 <( < Z CJ) u.: - '" <"'>'" CDO ~- - ~'" 1Il_ -- o.U '" .r::: U .8 ......~ C~ Q)~ e Q).S: a>:5 CO W Q)"i:: ",.r::: Q) Q,) 3: ,1:;: oo;Et::=o g1306 N ro Q.:;:; .-cPa.. "'oll::E 00_ Q) O.r:,caX N ~.!! Q) ctiol!m u." = c...s::: .a c.:::: .. :J <( Q) ~ a. Q) 't"'" CO -g E ~oca.9 -2 ~ '" CO'" ca 0)._ CD .c: E ni ~ o Q)::I.., .s ~ "i a ",>" : row..... C ro Q) C . i:o=EN ~.gccs u.s"o; Qj ~ cc>~ '-.- 0 ("') (5 E Olcvj OWmc.o "5Qio..-- (I) -0 ..Q en ~ Q) ro $:= Q)l:'!, :o~ '" C ~Q) o E a. Q) ~w Q) , >.0 .- :0 Ucn Q) :n o 0: -0 C '" o N~ -0 -0 ~ Q)-o "'c al'" ~ o C -" " <( OJ '0 U) C '" :0 Q)'- lG E .~~S:::::t E ~ 0 0 .......- 0.. Qia>'rt;w a;:Q~ll:: "O.S CD Q) ~ 1i)""5~.s= E:o 1ii", 0 - C CJ ~ Q) c: 1:: i'3 "'<( E .!!l ooe co. c.:J:.o . (j) ~ CD (I):J-g> 0 O::com03: -Q)CE"'- ca Q)'- -.::=' cn.D,nmmc.. '-oo_"Ooa. Erou-o.2:J Q...c.!..s Q.l ~ c.-oo..cQ) <( ~ c.'~~ m "C E ~e.2 3: c: c - a..c '- ca '- Q._ 3: co c:lDQ.m (l) oEi~Q)O>- .-rnClJE......o - ~ Q) ca_CI)owr- .= ~_..... rn~ ca 0 ca"'O Q)'- >-;:Q)-o-o wWQ>-gw2 m:5>m.cc:: .r:.'-;:;c......Q) f-Q)lG ->-E ..:-:..:5E=~Q) ;2l?.!:Jaia. ~3:Ci ~:Q.~ -< z ~ Q) ~ '" o 70;:; '" '" . .- 1:: -0 f! 0 Q) c.c.m o."Q) <"'~ '" " 'C~", '" f- '" lG Oi ;: c"C:'!::::: .2 O.c ca E.2 :J;:;..c: 0i'5;: >::;; ~ W .E Q) ~Q) .r:::",'" 1-......& -Q) ~ ",.r::: :0 o ~ a. .- Q) ...r::: Q) .;;: 3::5 OQ)-o ~~Q) a."'> :0 Q) Il)(ii-_ O>.r::: OQ)" "'~'" ;: '" '" 1Il:O '" zE.r::: --~t) ;..:... 0";: ~c.u; -- CD._ l:'!,ll::C ~ Q) ~ Oi .!!! E a. a. <e: 'Co '" ., lG_ e: " o lG ,- a. 1;;e "'.- - ~ lG 0 >- w,., Q) DI .r:::o f-- o -'C '" 0 .2.c:: . .!! a; en > e .!!! e := a. '" ,- '" " ",Q)lG 0"'- o"'e: "''''0 3:00;:; 1Il:O lG zE1:: ~t: [ ~o", .e: Co c: ~",lG ~a::l:i '" " .g> " ~ o "" u -< :< z ~ Q) Z <0 .... N '" '" <0 ~ -- - aio ~E E e: 0 Q) ~ Q) :J~..c 'C~.r::: e ~ c:.,2....._ t >. CI)'-"O E!2..Q e"'Q) ~ u..~ 0" Q)-O ca CO Q) Q.) ~~R.~u:cn CI)>.::i<(.-c~ caUQ)()~ECT .Q_uot::!:::"~ I C c: CD Q) 3: 1:: "'e o.r::: " '" .!Q o ,-- ro - 5: c.."O Xl.8 (/) 0::: ID Q) ='--0 roo S O::Q)~IDt-o~ -Eca::::OCD- ca ca =.- 0. (/) (/) .!! ... o.Q) E CD 0 (/) ca..: .oCDo.ID ... CJ C ::i ,7" 0 C c.. c ,- (/) ........ 0.:::J c...- VJ ID en <(CI)::.oc:O):- "0 ca ~--:ai'E~ = = Q) ~ c: o.l.L lG :c ~ E!2' E <D a=ocm~<? +o:tiJ~-oIDg . ca~VJ-C:C:MC ~ -:.c ID .Q.Q ui ID Ci c.. -- ,~ '0 t) '- E > 0 c VJ CD Q.) CD C W "0.- c: VJ VJ -0 '- Q)caE~3:5:C:~ ~ll;:Q)Q)Q)~g .._a.~zzQ)-= :> ~.g ~ o~'> ~ SErnu~:S~..Q '" "' ~ I.. -< 'C .;: Z o u. - o ., ;: '" ..J co CD '" , CD o o '" .r::: U ",' It) ~ '" , CD o o '" .r::: U "' - -"' '" lGN ~ :; cO , _0 CD - 0 C ~N l.L 0._ '0 N .....c:-J .c ~() "' o 0 (() lO - .N o VJl.L ' ~p!-:~ I ::JM 0 CC-oMN o ai~ Q um..c N e..... u .c o.M U ~M -:Bm ~ E~ '-0'" CD C C o Q)'- o E-o N ro ~ .c c ij:: o ~~ cO 0. VJ ~ m rn CD.r:::" o '" III 0=> ",.0", "'- .c......u oLTIa; ~ CD o .... "' o "' "' '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" " 0lJ '" " ~ o 12 u -< -< -< z z ~ Q) ~ ~ Q) ~~ Q) <0 Z N g -~ ~ '" "';:=:: ~ "'<0 ~ ~t::" ~ <0 ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" M '" '" CD <0 <0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N <0 ~ '" M <0 u.: o ...J E 'C .~ ~ :; VJQ)-- "0- .......uE-- ~Ci c ctI 0 C Q)'" Q) 't: '- Q) "o:::s E ::i -- E .-... c VJ -- "0 ~ ro meo E-&i O..c: l55Q)E ~~ 0);;:; ~ ro .0 c eo m VJ c: .8 .Q u 0:':: ~ CIJ ro ..Q ID C 0. Q)_ 0) '- Q) - ,-::i --EO cuo. .5:0."0>" 0)0 O)oc(J cQ.LL C1JU W c '5 '-Q)O :s rn E Q) "O.8ro5- 'w-rn-J c-cQ) ~~o- Q) = o.t: . '- O)N Q):Z;mLL"O'-<i" cD -a. E Q...c: 0 ID 0 <D > .... m 0..... -J VJ '- 0 CG~--oc Orno CjO)Q)ctlOoo.WN C~c..ccNe~..c:: Q) ctl Q) U 0 <i" Q.lO () -lGa.e~:O::::;<DmN :> m CJ _ Q) . ... :> Q) . -:t::: CJ o..c: ca = Q)C)mEN__--m ~ c ca .- .- () 0) ... ::I (/) = .2 ~..c Q) c CG "-olG-",u::="''' 'i:-oE&.m IDU.: DI<( >.. IDJ: ca CiQ),-VJ~'O'CI) .._VJQ)c__,-"O m N en ::J o..Q en o.:a c~lG~Q)~;:c" ij::~O$!(JooQ):> ID ..-.. U ro'- "0 = ..c .! O~"';:};"'<(;:1Il " :0 ~ '" :..=~ o..~ 0..- -<.2 _u it> II .8 -<2 ~ " zV5 <0 "' ~ ..... "' ~ "C .8 .E G> . '2 "C G>_ "0 Q) G> C c E ZG> Q) ro -E E ~ C G> ro Q) G>_ I<f) E ~~ -0. <f) iQ) .;0 C cm I Q) Q) 0 G> c ~ ~ E w c '" '" < :::; 0 " () " ro () ~ > Q) 1< .:t I , I , I ---L . : ~ ~ Q) Q) z I ~ ~ :0 m m ro 00 r-- r-- ~ ~ M M M M <0 <0 ~ ~ - ~.._-- "Cj '0 '0 " " 0) 0) 0) 0) G> 0 bll bll .;; .;; 1Il.c '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ 0) 0) 0) 1Il_ ,~ > ~ !e " 0 0 "C G> 0 " W W "C.c.Q ..'2 :J :J <!.:,: u -< ....l ....l u.. "- :.: - Z -< Z en u: -Ill MC "'0 ....- - ~ .. G>_ -'- a.0 III .c o ~ -0 C ro ~ '9: N ro r-- ~ M M <0 ~ -'= N ro r-- ~ M M <0 ~ - ~ ~ ~ r-- r-- ~ M M <0 ~ Q) <' Q) f; <f)Q) CD t=' :I: 0> ..c 0 l.{):>. ro: E ~ "iii J: ~ .'~ :J t:'~..c ~.E 8 ~ .g_ ~~o ~::0~C/) 0 ou ~ c U..c C) ca E -.J 0.'- ~ 0 22 u) 5 ~ ~g~ wf ~oroE~~~~~c ~~ -:>._ E~ ~w~8~cQ)rncEQ) ~~ mODe _~ ~~m ~.~K~O _~ OCuQ) c_ ~ OOO~ o-w - ~ ~ ffi .~ E .a 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ .~ 'S .~ ffi ~ ~co ~ ~ ~ g.-.J ~ g>.c. E ~ E c g ~ ~ ~ ~ o~uu ro~~~~Uc~uro~Q)o _Q) NO"O(/) C <DC)t) l-"OCO>uw:: Om .(/)roc roC~-Q}-Q)crocroc_ ~ ~~Q)o~~.QaJ:..c~~cac.E>roQ) ~ u. a..o <f) 0 >.""'" 0 - ........ 0 o>"'iS..::I:"en OJ () (/) > 0> l- u~Nca-E -w"Ew ~o ~Q)E~-.Jcro ~o ~QJJ:.5c:J..c c mEO>..c~QJa..ccacIu.~Orom..c; ca~ ~o'~uID~!UO.QC/)g~~E.~l-QJ Olc ...u ::Ju:,wc....OrnQcuQ)J::>,t:g_ c .g .5: en rJ) 0 E (l) lh Q) > -.J O)..c -..c ::J..c'~ I~'O ~~~~oW5~5~C/).5!E(fJ~~~ i ~ 0 tll eN '5 0>-= - CD lD ~ a. e mE ....... ~ U') ::O::::s ~c~. c'~oQ)..coE- c ........ rou O~0>Q)Bc.~cc5~=o~;::Jroro wca oQJC"O .Q::Joo~Emocac8m5 w> -E'~~ .0000~E> coo~0~.5c c~ 0w~cW'~c~cg~0~mzoco om ~~om~O,-w~~IDmZ_ m~'ffiz ~C ~x~ -um~~oro0~~_m ~m C m Q) ~ -:.::- mOm "'C .5Q (lJ ~ cOo.5 m . (lJ U m= oo.i:~~ >.~ Q)~::a 00::.2 ~ I- m:eLLO <f);: ~ooo~~-~ ~I-ro~c-(lJOEE 3~ OQ)~ oo'-~-ro-(lJ(lJm - ~ID~ .t::! 3: DJo -,:e C rn w ~ c E l:: ID ~ >. m - c .c c coooWmQ)~ CCl-~cro ~ 0) r/}._ . c c:: (.) m _ 00 co m ~ m ro _'- CD m.... on=omo~cmrooo'~u,~uE~~rnc O~~N'~n~ro~ ~~cl-Cl->o~~ (lJe~~ooW~~ ~~~o~~Beo'~o 0::: m"'O (/) c:t: ~.c 0 B:.= c:t: ~ o..c CfJ (/) nN!c:t: 0 ~--i- ,~.__._-- ro CD 0 ..-- ~ i ~ ~ ;e N G' .6 ,:r:: ._ ::l I~ ~ i E , 'li ...... V1 g '1'0 ~ , - .;; ;;. C2 Ii ~r I:.:J .- ....... I......) ;;;.. 0 lu. ~ I I 1 i 0) ~ ~o.. '0;;: ~'-' ~.s ~~ 0) u~ 2 .- o.~ " e<: 0 Cl ~.B 15"-- ~ 0 0.0) c:~ 1l)'5Cl.. Eo;;: "'220 0) '" E ~ "''0 0.. ~ ;;:E '-' 8 ~ ~~ :.=(/) crn:E(/) o c'- m :;Jocu-rs Em Ea.-o ._ 0 m zoO- 5Q- 0 0 'UOO~C -5coo ~'ZroE 'C ~ .~~ t)oomc ~.g1:~ Wrno(/) , '"' i ~ ~ ~ I " ~ N " Q) N N ~ ~ , ~ ro 0 0 r:::- oo , r-- 00 co 00 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N M M M M M M M '" M M <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ - c.- OJ ..cO Imoro -E '0 i Q) ;:E 5 0 (lJ >- I- C o iii m:E~ E.o .Etb 2 = - en c m "0 c a 'c .E rn ::> ~ ..--- .0 Q) .Q ~ ~ o..c: "'0-0>- BE; m. Cl) ;g cs;:J -D- '5U "0 mOO nsQ.)~ Co. Q.) ~"O ..Jc>' mrn Cl). ~ .~ Q.) f m .0 E m 5 -g '0 ;:-'=<f) ~.c::2 fE m(l) _ --:J rno I- mii :lQ.)~ :12 _x rn 5rn LL"ELL C"CI>~ .~m a. c (;j u.: .~ -5 W ... m LL ;;; 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 :5 .~ ~ g m 9 ~ ~ ]3 ~_ cCro"O_o mONc.oE 03 00 "? ffi "E c:t: ... g-l() 0 ~ cst >ojl1ocoEmI :;i5<';Jgw ~~ m E I 0"0 <0 (") E'" ",0 m::io 0 G)t'\ C co, coN -.oN "'-..J ocoom_ ~_.c;;"G> m u_N 00::: (lJ..c .Q~ucc:S ;ID..c;:O ~u >.6) m G) ...... ~ E u ~ Cl) 'U ...... ffi ro ro E E .~ G) m . M ~ ~ cQ) I- r--- g E G) m en Q.) 5 ~~ C E .E~~~~~ ~zrol()~ 2-0 E. ocOLLcaQ)ID~E xc t'),; m ca - 0 :!:: mI 0 ro (l) Q) .8;e:JroE-g~_i~'Orooo 'O~ ooc.ri~o-rnrocnCl>_{")~ W l()C2:.Q!!<t-<!?m(/}cc.riro. (I).5!? ~ .;;; -0 ~ ~ J: ~ :5 .~ E ~ -g ~ ~ ~ o 00 Q.) .~ 0 J: 0 moot m ro w 00 m (lJ.S! ::J 0 0 N :> C C9 C - ~ - <L> 0 C: 0-"0 . ~ 0 ~ co 00 ci ~ ~ m2(l)WcOJ~=>-.(l)..cIDN WE ~.":..Ul, ':..<\>05 U <l: .0 c:.1~ 5 N 0 <f) =_L__~ __; ~ _} I ~ Q.5o :Ot/)~ ._ c_ -O<f) rn ._'_ Q.1O.c:: E-~ o <f) 0 ".0 C t: ID ~.Q .9 t/) _ +-' -::JEco :::J -0 I- C: :ecw~ l::.!Q a. c .~ mE 8 "'0.500 _ uoo-'c 'i:: ~ ai.Q ol-Em ~ ~ C -:> _'UI-I:.... m co ID (l) B.~ Ei ~ ~ :v Ol is ~.b~~ ~(/}.Qu Q) <f) x c~ ~~ .Q;.;:::.- t/) t)-O::J(l) Cl> co CT._ (/)OO~Q 5: ~_ 00- a) ~~5m rnOzu :,;:19:2 ~ca{/)::) ......-.o~ rof/l"'LL Q) .c <f) O~orn r-- <0 ~ N ~ " :0 '" .~ ~ o..gf 0.", ~..c -u i C II .8 ~E ~ '" ZVl 'D CIl 'D CIl_ CIlC ZCIl -E CCll CIl_ EW -g &i . CIl 0.. E ::;; <( (!) '" E VI ~u ~ -5~~ IDeo u 0 e '00 19 0.",.<:: .9'E.g> -"'c c c 0 ~ro:o:; "(f.j.l::o ::J Q...S ~ 2~fj) (!)~'6 'Dj CIl 0 VI.::: co_ CIlCll .. .. ~.CD 'D'::: <(~ ~ a... 2 a... :EE:E 080 I ~ " "O~'fi " u "- 0/)00 '"2 a v ~E~ 0" - c S =' -"''00 u C " -< S :a '" tn V 5 ~ ~-S_OCJ) u ~ ~ s:: c: :2 0 en]-U; ~.g :;0 c g c'V)',;::";;;..r:: gse~~ -6 0 0"0 ~ c: (Ll._ 1..<"'0 ~ a ~ t.8 5 - <Il Il) rJ'J te ('jo:o (]) ('j ~.. ~ "'0 . :E E ~ .;: <2 0<< 0 o Uo a . ~ Z ui u.: -co MC CDo ~ ... .- - '" .. .. CIl_ ~ -- 0.0 (J) .... .. .::: 0 <D 0 '" ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ '" <D '" '" <D ~ Z Z ~ c ~ 0 ,9 0. Vl - :;j ~ .g [i a .;;; ;..:::: t) 2 ~.5 0.. c~ ...c: - 0 - 0._ 0 c:t1..o ~ " ~ ~ OIl ,,8 '0 C ~ ~.g ~ ~'2 ~ iO ~ Vi '0 -- '" (I)~TI OJ en co Q) Q) CD :::J en ~ ~~c~(O- Q) N (ij cnB ~ ,::::1 - := ..... to g cD E~'~ ::::J .0 ..cu ........ ('lJ 0 .......0 ro Q)N m a ...... 1:: CD l- "C C Q) co -- (/) lEe <J 0 ca a. 0 >'-:J Q) "i: ~jjj 0 Q)~ P Q)"i:N aU).- .a~.g (f) Q.uj 0.9 Q)Q)c~o ~~~. om~ ~cu~~Q)c~ .0 . -.Q co N .- CD..c. z- ~ :-: > OJ (; co () ~ Q .... U)......c 'Ern_u 1oI.o......~ "_-"'0_, (1)~~""'C:::u. mOE~o~ mElD _..cC crnroO~~oomo o-moV>O E '0:>" OWeD Q) -mQJutnE...J o~u-m c5W('lJ =~E u~Q)-E~rn~~~ ~l-cQ)l-ui ~:o:;~~. ~rnu ~~~i cao~ "",mjg:5_c >!9=_ coUiai >.=oE(I)Ec...J-o Q -g UJ '- ~ ,Q 0 Q).o 0 ._ W E :t: <{ a. u rn 0 OJ - ~ C";J ~rn..cu~c~ ~~!9~ ~ co 0. c~~~~~~o .00::)(I)Q)00 -Q)oooC >r-....c t:co.9Q.l o..C~Q)O ~~oog.9-Q ~"::Q).2' ONrn Q)N......E~EID,........N ~:.::u._-.^~ ornc.... t:c~ ~eem"""~_EOc' Q) V'v, ->rnQ) t:o cOQ) ~~ 0 ~ M~~~C~O meet: -~~~o~Effio~rnN~O CD ro U'J:.:: Q) _ 0> ~.- :.: t:n 0 c 0 .- 0 c - '"0 c. t . o.E c~ cQ)m.~-..ID~~rn.~m.c~ a..1i ~ 00 .- m ~ c .- (/) ~.o (/) Q) en Q) ...... c u GiEJ9mE"E c~~.2 g:u:.E~gu:~_..ac_.. ~ou(/}-Q)en IDQ)O>- ~ 0 Q)o= ~ CDO>U >~C~ J:oO~E"OO~ciO'E..",Q) m(/}......~oc Q)......._~ ~Q)m~~moE"OG- ,cQ)o?,:o>m Ci.oE'i: Q) ~o::.c ~o~ Cc I O~c'_>~~oo ~5.E_~ umo~~mOa.."""IDQ)~ .., 'V..... ....co~o-co-ocE:J- 0:.:: U'J (1) 0 ~ .Q:!:::"';:':C 0 cD a. ~ t:ncD m u (1) n 0 -..a~~~& uE~_ -oc~coomEmwN .J9......(1)(/}~ ID~O~ ~o.Q~~o......U)u~~.c !OOc:5~..a (/}(1)0>t: ON......:;::~NUQ)CO~_O ~Q)(1)~O(1) a.c~ > .a..~o .Q)~Q)~~ c~EO=a.. ~m'Ec >~om_~~.SEU)......CD- ~cc-mm (1) 0 ~ou -O'Vrr . .co~U).~o c52.- .... mwcu cIDmC-cQ) o :.::; ID Q) C U) rn - ~ = '2 >'''0 C - li' 0 ~ ~ ID 0 or; m ~ :J .Q u U) Cl ID .- :::I ..a ID Q) ~ u. - 0 E C ,.... ~o>uroS ID~Q)E EU~E~uug~"Ogo Q) Q)......_v ......~ _ Q)U~_....IDC._ c~O U)~o~;~m.S';:'~~EroQ)~oro~U)~Q)~N ~oe~co~g~fOoO~~~S~5~~E'~ a..~ 0.(1) m ~ 0 ~ m _ ~ 0 Q)._ _ 0 _ .c. _ rn :.:: co <D ~ (J) <D ~ o ..... ~ '" - '" o ro c_ .Q ~ :gE i.i= 0... '" 0 'Ow '" > .<:: '" ~'O '" '" '0 ~ c>. ro :~ o.c X :J WE -E .c~o o _u ....1-- o o N '" ~ '" - o o.=~ CloQ) -m...... c~..c Q)- Q) .>.0...... >Q)- -(/)>. ~ro~ 'i:: ..o~...... c ~-guoroo.~ omQ)~:5tu ~ c .~ U) C 0 ID ..oom~oa.U) "~c~'U:ie~ >. m.- ~.- a. w :!: t:: m > .- =oEmeQ) :- :9 0.-03 0.:5 ~ =~coQ)~~ cu~mt-Eu..-:; -......""0 ro _ Q) co - ~ Q) a.. c c T""" .!!.E ~ m.Q'(ij- u>..-c:!::::......u ;~f3~:g.~ffi t: :0 m'- co E..- .-.- Q) C N ~~~Q)EQ)T- ..... ID m > ..a0" 0..... (/)Q)-ci......co c~uuQ)g..- g ~ ro.g ~ ~ ,-,-u Q)'_uC"') cOca.~mco i.i:: c m 0 Q) T""" . m co...... Cl rn c . ~ ""O.~ (/) c...... (/) 000 m4- CD'C Ou C...J -E .!Q .2 c c m'~ ~ U'Jc~~~uoo(!; mrnma..rncQ)N (/)Ci.U'JQ.l mOl .- 4- (/)...... Or-.... >Q)o:5"'E(/}~a Q)~-4- rn Q) 0...0 n::...... Q) oU.2 Q)N ..- > c~~ Nm~UrnLm..c ~-E~ffioo~fjjo <l) :0 '" .~ ~ 0.01) 0.;; -<-= ~U ~C II .9 -<3 ~ '" Zci5 ~ ..... ~ '0 Gl '0 Gl_ Glc: z.. -E C:Gl Gl_ EW 'O~ c:m Gl E <( 'O'i Gl 0 lO.c: '"- Gl" ~ ~ '0" 'O.c: <(~ < - z ui u.. M~ <DO ~,- - ;.f! -.- 0.0 I'- ~ I'- o ;;; <<i <D ~ , ~ Q) '" > Q) 4=0:;-' "'e'" O)o~ c.- t- .- 10 0 ~to 110 o~ o-gg.ro ~.s: C Q) I E ctI (/) "'I:I'l.....;:.co OQ) (j ~1iiE-5 "0 Q)._ ~.~~~ u.. >- c . M~.Q.!: L.L.. cg=_+-,O 't"'"~Oai...J G;=~E~ ~Q)ct'lQ)~ ~ - () 0) , ftln; cu cur-- J::._..c co ou-ooo o:;.!: E ~ - t:....... >...c In._ a..uu !!-IDC g.....uQ) c:rnx........-:... ftI=~~~ J:: (/) U= um"8cQ. ~";:: 8 g- ~ Q) ~ 0...0"'0 0"-00 -- ~ -5 .~ ~>-(/)o.. -.--- ~ z .. 0) c: '" ~ . Cl c: .2 '0 c: '" 0- j:::. lOlL. - 0 0-' 0- - ::;,;~ Q)~ ..c' ~I'- 00 ~O eN o . ._ ..c :ffiO 'u Q) c: ..c.!!! ~o. Ul c: :g 0 '5+:0 Q) '" a::t: .0 <Do. -lO ~c: -'" "'~ -- .8 ",,, 2~ ~"'~ e '" Q) Q) 0..0 E ::l E m(/)<vc >"'C U <1.l o Q) Q) E . o..<vOuc E C Q) C Q) -czWE roQ)......E~ .-:: E ~ rn ~ 0... III - W rr 8w~u~ 'O-g Q)'" 3oo~ -g8rn -CN(I)LL u -'CO cn~Q) ~~ -' '" Q) E - Q).D-a""" >-EeO IQJCl.l<;J IDuEt- .?: (J.l roO L.L..OOO Q) >. eN f;..c-o..c::: 0"0 Q)O ~Q)Ul ID;Ecn-a roEE2 -0..0 (/) a... a...::J._ 0 ::JU)Q)"O m<Ll-rnC'O :J..c"'O .~ E.9 (/) OJ tt123f;ro c:c_"O co Q)- 0... (/) E ....: ~ CO Q) Q)...... .~ >~ ~ ::l 0 '" ga.~~ a::EQ)::l . = -E "0 ~!9 >.(1) .0 .- L ~ :::::g.rog ~U ~ ro ~ Z Q) 10 >. .~ :Eniuro 0== Q) ::J Co.!::!:: ..... ftI"(ij C ~CJQ)ct'1 E (])..::.-~ ..cQ)~ C ~ u.~ w.....c<O E Q).~ u troc.rn ~"O EC.u.: Q) g-8~O 0- rn...J Q.) ~.~::: v- :Scoooo .....Cc::JN co co E I ..c '" I'- ......ceca .......rn:JoD c_O.-N Q)'- - co ECcnu..c .Q '-l;::0 ~(/)-:.;::; .- (/) c: 0 . :J.- Q) c- gEEE~",al ~ .. ~ Q) 00 a;:5 g- ..c en ...... "0 .....c_c(t) (/)ocO)....... 2zcPEo ~~E~C Q)OO Q)'5-~ O._>(JQ) ___.~ 0 CLl ........ -2-EQ.L..~ M'U E~ 0.. __<(._........::J <>: Z ~ E " u:i ::: " OIl" " - .- " ~ ~ " .- o " :r:: if 4-< ~ o ~ _08 ....: ~ " >,'0 .~ 'S;: - 0 o ~ 0.0. " " " OJ u:i ~ ~E .- " ~ ~ " .- o " :r::if 4-< ~ o C3 - = ~ - " >,'0 U .- .- > - 0 o ~ 0.0. ~ Q) Z ~ Q) ~ "= G> ~~~ c: ::c 0) -e.f:...J ro.- ro c VI L.......... .00 :J C - E"ca.E~-E (/) c",~;g .! L...........:;: ~ ..... N U>-,CLlc>u c::J. ~ = E Q) C U .- c b .:;:.!! 0 E $! ~ ..c -g ,Q 0 Q) C.) C Q) .~ C :-!:::: mooN ~;Q)~(I)Q.)3:UN.c rnc:EOJcE.........Q~o ._a..cooQ)c ...... C It- 0 OJ U Q) $! .~ ':;: ..!Q,~-cc""'{/)>.Q)co 0.. a.. ~:c .Q g.oo t L.. ~ ~ co Q).f: ro OJ 5 ~ c ctI .- E U .0 Ol c U 0 ;: Q.) g?Q)COL..:-2:CcL...8Sd! Q) (/) C 0 E.c 0 o..c ~ ..c :J .- t5 Q) .is ~ Q) ;: ill Q)u c co L.. m..c 0 en c.cgO-ctI~g;~c E ~ :c .~ ~ ~'E C", c ~ OQ)C_Q) Q)~ U ..... 0 ctI ........ L.. Q) ~ E ::l :J U c: ctI 0 ..... N'\ L.. ctI ........ 0 c: ~ ro \J~ a.. 0 .........2 rn .- 0 (/) ..c LL 52 ...... ctI ___ 0>._ (I) Q) e ..cCU,.-a>"tLL..!..'-::'>Q) -; E ;:: ~ 8..-::.'(ij :::. Q) E Q) 0.0 0 ON-COU 0.. :2::uc c.:S$!:S~52 >CQ)Q) ornOcQ) ellltEgJoocoorn> Q. E 0 0.. (f) ..- .Q ..- ..c III U 0..0 (/)MtM L..U --- c 0..- Q) c0 0 M :J ~ Q) Q) :J Q) L.. <D 0..<D ~ ""E en >u O..-=U (") (/)Ill-o~L.. .CC __ rn __ U co l/) 0.. If) _ ro e ~'(ij ::>-e Ul Q) e u Q) e .8:2 If):-!:::: ci:cQ)Cl E .!: Q) III .= ::s ::l 0 c:r.c: ~ .. ~" e ~ Q) 0 E:l< ~o ;';, ~ . eQ)lL. '00::00 ::l"'-' ~"Ea:l (l)~~ ..c"" ~ I'- (/)00 Q)-O UlUlN "5 Q) . (l)~..c a::UlO . Q) . ~ro~ ..-:J:;::; c cr C ~Q)::l ~ -g 8 0> e .C ro ::l Ul Ul Q) ~:Q ~ > 00 - ~ e a. "'''' c.~LL "'ceO Ci.0...J 00 - ",Nce ro..-:~ .8 >, r.!.. 0030 Q)--'o :0::: >,N S.o.c o ClO (j c: c '0 -ri '(ij::s Q) -e 0 Ul Q).c: .~ u .. E m ~.~ ,s.e 2 rr~ co Q)O'" a:: ~.'!1 .....: Q) -E u::c~ ~~ ~ .co~ <01; g: N I'- " ~ '" :D '" ~ ,~ v o..~ a.'" <>:..c ~u it:- II -2 ......3 .:::: '" :zuo 1:1 Ol 1:1 Ol_ Ole: ZOl -E e:Ol Ol_ EW -g~ Ol E < <l.I '+-0 <I)~ ~ ~~.5 ..c 0 3 S 'C oS ~ a a Z:l .~ .~ - i8 '''::: ;::::: iZl ti 0 -a j ..s ~.9 11) ~ ~ C>>.o"'OoE..sOeo fD.c !.'l3 (l) III l:: E...c:: . coo_.......cuOvu("") G)&o....,tio...a...c\O -c~~Ci>.;:j..cg...... "C.s:: (!) ~ u V).~ 11) < ~ 0 Vl s::.~ - 0 ''::''''0 ~ Q)'d) ~...... o...t.:::l::l-.....Vl ~"E ~ ~ ~ ~ 05}S~~~ u ~ '" < z cri u.: -Ul Me: ~.2 - ... .. Ol_ -- o.u 0 ~ c:o U ;;; <'i co ~ Ol '0 :> U e: .8 '" e: ~.Q 00. .... Ol , 0 ... x o Ol 0>- .... 0 cri e: .~u.: u. :J 0 MO-J CD C _ ... 0 v ... 00 Gte,",:" 1::.2 "- cu......o .c: "'0 05N o a...c - ~ (J '" '" . ~.:-~ t:: U)._ ca"'O:::= .c r::: = u"'u ~:! wt:: e8. -... ::!.'ii OlV .cO -N .9~ ..0 ..0 ",N ;..c ",0 U .~ ~ '" Ol .. ro e: c .. 0 .Q+:; "'0. '" Ol '00 2~ "'>- c 0 ,2> c '" Ol Ol t: '0:> ~g roo o 0 ~c 00 W+:; CL", "'t '" 0 'OCL '0'" <c ~ 0.0- -~ ..caLL :=::-0 ~~-J ~ Ol Z .c i'>EO C aJ cO Ol- '" 0)..... '" >-.. O)CfJ c - " ._ m 0 c "'0'- coa. .!l!E", o.~u "02>< c:E CD "'0'" -._ CJ Ol 0) e: -OlOl "'- ... -"'... C/')b::l Ol CfJ U =cc .coo _ 0 .- .. ;:- '" c~Ol o a..S +:oE..c ~~~ :>0.0 '" C '" cot) 8:.;::; a> en ~.9 u.: Ol'- 0 s-:~ o~ 'S E._...J (JOlo.V- (J)cooo 0:::.- CON "'C._ I Cro~r---. ::::::::0)"08 ~~~N '0 ... on '0 ... ~ o " "" u < ID,c Cl.l >.. '0 "w:';::; :J em (3 Ol '" C .c 0 _ ~::; CJ) Q) Cl.CJQ):::lE.c Ea.:s :: 8E~u~ Q)'---~C :s"i~E::::J c Q.).- >. 150"0-0 ..c'- - co c ..... aO C Q) ......CD.!QOt: Ci-<("o,:::l (1)","" Q) (,) EO. '- C u.: ~1:~o8o 'S cP g C c-J gE:o Q) rnv- .....Q.c:E:.;:;o m.2 0 a.mCjJ .,Cc>>oo t-- .....> CQj 00 (/) QJ'm >:::0 Q)"O 1:: Q.) eN 1V co Q)"C Q) . mQ)U<D50 O.~ 4i':; a. -o~roE"ti ~:S::::J:s82 -'" '" ~ m ~c ~ := --.-......CQ)-(/) 'O"'OlE"" :::l I- Q) 0 ~E:;~:-g:E -.cg'Sm-g ~.!!!og"-o __0...0.....000 '0 ... on '0 ... ~ o " "" u < '0 C '" .... >..............0 .cCON cQ)c~ OE",o ._ 0....-0 -OCN ..- '" tnQ)-..c E ~ ~O EO.8 . Q) >..U U) ~ _ Q) en ftJ~Ul.2 .s:::Jeo"::':: t{JO C ~ .!ro2.c ftJ "'0 a... Ol C 'i:: 0 C 00 :.;:::; .- u:: C m t:: "'c o ~ Ol 'E Q. ~ C ._ 2 c.~ (ii c.EQ)"- >-= E 0 crowOl m C Ci.!: 10 ,Q E g J:: 0).-"'0 ......~Ccv .. '" ~ cv-- "- ;.;:: 0 a.. 0 .-...... ro- m C w cv _w....._ OE",cQ CLo'" :O.Q~ 5 ::=:::Q) U o...~ N [) ~UlO ~"'O(/)~-' C') "- ~ 0.0 ~ '" ... g ~ '" 1E ... ~ '[; '0 '0 '0 .'.:;0 '" ... ... u o'r: "- on on " 0 ~ E '0 '0 '0' ~"" '0 ... ... ... ... '" '5 0 S ~ ~ on"" '" "" ... 0 0 '0 ... ~ u- " ] ~ ~ 0 (/lr.u "" :<'0- .~ u u o ' "" < < ~ .8 ~ :0 "" >>.0 " U _ p.. < " " 0 U ~ Ol ~ ~ o Ol '" :> " "'.- 0'" Olt .oOl o O)~ c.- '0 ~ c c Ol Ol E E EE 00 00 E",u: emo ~--' 'OOl W J:: v~ 'Oto :>OlN u>. OlOl"- ~co CL>-O _",N :EE..c E ,.,0 o.U oC+-' -mOl ~ t: E Ol '" Ol 'OU~ <{,,'" 0", U C v_o -0'- Wo:=: ::=:::.s::"'O ~o5 _"0 ~ Ol ~ vi 0) o :;:0 .0 ,,-'" .S! ai .0 - E .. m Q) m Ol>~ ..0"'0 .e a.-g '" .~ 0 ~ ~ ",,,'0 .s:: ,Q Q) '1O~ .!:: t Ol '" 0 - CL.o .!~.B "''''- c.::. 0 .2uC t:=~.~ 00 C o.Olo 00....- ... Ul 10 o.OlO) Ulo:E ~EEu: ="-J::Q <(00-, Ol :> Cc UlV- --0100 "'OOJ::~ C__I"- co "'0 UlO o2~O -- u .- N co~~..c ~::oou Ol .0 .8 ~ Ol ~ N c:o ~ C') <'i co ~ '" Ol " ~ ... Ol ~ ~~ o 5.~'~ :="'0 ;:; g Ul cc ftJQ)_ 'co rn t:: '00 t - 00.;';:: ai Ol m .. Ol > u;::- c"'O CD .E~ ftJ~:; >.0 l:: Q) Q.) uco m-o~ cM J::"'OO ~ui ,,~m-g ~-Eu..o::o.9 Q.) U.- co J:: C:;:-'U5~""" 0....... . Q.).i: U) U cCO 0"'0 E2~.B.s::Q.) O en . __ - Q.) .- I"- c :J U .l=~OQ.)ftJX lioo E tnQ.) EUNcoQ.) Q.)""O..c :v:;: E xQ)o>o.2 QJ g- 0 ftJ 0 c - . C'l.Q > ro ~ ~ eo >>g en Q.)::: U 0 tt:: ;:"'O;n.QC~ ..Q tnm co f... - -"0 n <(._ . en ::I C en 03: 0:.;:::; r::- ::I ~ .Q C .~ ~~c.ri<:8~ OJ :0 '" .~ ~ o..gf c.", -<-= -u ~ e- II .8 -<.8 ~ '" zVi v "- ~ <D ~ " .. " ..- ..", z.. -E '" .. I ..- EW -g~ i .. E <C " '" ~ ~o.. ,,'i u;;: 20 0- .. 0 ~'" ...<: "'.a ..- "", f! E. ~ ".. '" ~ ".<: '" " " ~ <C~ "'''' -'" '" '" "- ;;: 0 << <( <C ;z - z <Ii ~ Ii ... Ol M", ~ "'0 ~- en - .. '" I ..- ~ -- ~ a.U '" co .<: ~ U '" '" <D ~ c: .Q , ..c ~r-- " ~o '-' x 00 I c.ri '" 0..<'< I Ol -- lIJ. U aJ c..c i en c "0 ~ 0 c: ctl ::J-u "..- W co--c oS2oro ~E - 0 " ~';;5U. ..c:u 1_'_0 l- ~ :?:~...J .~'(3 o .~ co ~ {g .~ N 0 a..~ Q.l ro . f; ~ T"" U t:: ~::J a.......1 (f) Q) co ,- (J) U u.. (ll 0 ~ ~ - Q.l..c a ~...... M..c:_C\l "Ou (O--en. Uc 'f""'- lll..c rn::J '- o.!::: 0 I........ u .. 00" I'" ~ Q:i 0" uj ..c ~ i3:~c ~u J::o-cctl _0) OQ.c:o.. ai~ o Q.l rn 0) E Q) _..c::rno "OQ) .;.~32 CD ~ClJQ)UU wOLL ccrn E- c: --= m..c ro (/)0 came>, c....J J:: 04=: U . ~ Q) _ (.) 'caiU.-E~ "EIDL...OQ. ~ co E :J...J (/).~ ~ "0 Q) 0 ~ 3: ::J 0 c: L... c: ~ 0 0"0 roooo=w [;).~ ON <:(...... N _n '" r-- ~ 0.> :0 '" ~ .:2 Q.) o..~ 0..- <~ ~u o >> 2: ~ II B " ~S 2:Vl L...____ 't:J Gl 't:J CD.... CDC ZGl -I: C Gl Gl_ I:W 1l~ Gl I: ct 15 <: ~ ~o.. 't:J'ig:E CD 0 aO :::EE G,tG)O", ... .. E 0 "CCD"OVl "C.cc(/l ct.!s-13 ",'0 0.. '" :E o 0.. :E o >. .D '0 " ~ ~ " ~ '0 '0 '" 15 Z 15 <: ~ ~o.. U:E eo 0- - >. <:.D e"E ] ~ (l) ~ ~:g '" 0.. :E o < z <( z ~ z ~ z ~ z III u: - III MC "'0 ~- - ... .. Gl_ o.U '" .c o ~ '" ~ 0. ~ '" ~ ;;r ~ ~ '" ~ '" CD .... N M '" CD ~ ~ '" ~ N a;) N 0; M M 6> ;0 O'l o '" o N .... ~ I'- a;) ~ M M CD ~ ~ O'l ~ M M CD ~ O'l N N M '" CD ~ .5 ~ CD C c ~ E ~ CD -g .... ,-.5 E c 0'0 ca 0 """"'c oenoro 02 ~~-... 0 ~UCD -~~~ >-.~ tV 15 0 0 ~"C N CJ) co E ~ ~ (/)_ uCJ)~ EE~~ ...c~ C1]wep CD cO c~~ oe~E ~C1]O U)ro.~ UCDmc IDU~ -~oo -U) "C"C~ e~E.Q ~.~C .5w~~ g~~ ~~g ~Sua co ~_ Q) c..cr--..- C,Qi Q.) a. a.... c..:.:: c 0 o-row ca-oC Xc.. Oloomu OQ)-C'- -00& cn.5E Q,)m~ ~OEm N..c:...... (fJ a.-N E cnn. c... CJ a.> m_ I......_C ...c CD CD 0 "Owe o>.r::o ~cco CDO~ u~- C~CD u~ oomo 0~uf Om~ m~~ C1]~g~ ~cE>. caEa."O~ Q.~Q) >-m::s cCooc 0'00> E c ~.~~ ~Euc w::SCJ)m ~~~~ ~~C1]c ~I~ ~co EEa~ LI..:::E... oaJLi..CU .- -"0 o.Qu uEEC]) Em- Q,cOE ~~ffi ~5c cOQ)~ :=>-: roC'lL..JQ.. "'E- -&:Qo EUXa>LL ~~c>u... CJ)~o Sm~ 'C~; wQ)50 "'Q)C1];Osmm~ ca~.5 CJ)c~ ~5~c~ CD>.mc~~E~> -IIl.~C 280'" m-roOoo 1:: eCD 0>Q)1Q) E C ;~Cl)CJooQ)Eb"Cu.:CDm~ ~..c:Q.. ~Q)Ecm .ca.E~mECl)omo.~.-'- Eg~ uEca2~ Owu ~.--N-~-~~ C~- ~~0>"'2o o c C)r- 0 (!) . 0 _ ca _ <I> .... O'~<I>Co--~c~c-~ 8~~ ~~o'~o ;~E~oEioo~~~m -m~<I>E~._N ~GJ 1? m S ~ EQ) ~ :=' ~ ~ ~ o:S ~ TI ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ u"'" _c~~ <l>o~o _0 ~ro_~ ~O<l> C E en 0 u ~....... ~ 0 C <I> 0 :> -::::J ~ C ..... := >. cg 0..": cm~""Nm:::;;~ oc-IDctI(/)O".....cri O .... '" ~ ....- ..... --- 0 >..O'l ..... '" _ ~ _u ......~ (!) (/)> ~~c.......(/)cc~c U~ooIDEmO'l~~<I>CB ~m (!)(!)o-", -r-mE....--u~o ~Q)tca~~ _ ~cCDO C"1(/) (/)(/)UO~ -o(/)E-~E ~Q~rnc~~~ ~~..... 0000=Uca._~ E~-om-IDccri~o~~~~cN~c>~c (!)O~Num.......<I>~mm:>~ c~ mmO <I> X~~~uocrix~oo~eomm~~ooEg1?E Wro~(/)~U(/)W_W._roN~~caOWm__m CD I'- ~ I'- I'- ~ a;) I'- ~ O'l I'- ~ o a;) ~ ~ a;) ~ , a;) o o N .r:: U I.. '0 .;: o ii: ~ III a. III C III .0 ~ ::l '" rn ~ ::l o U III U W ::J -' LL "-l :::> -' u.. " -5 "'" o " 'b U " E o ~ <D i':' I'- ~ M '" CD ~ N a;) ~ <D i':' I'- ~ M '" CD ~ M a;) W ::J -' LL W I- ~ <D i':' I'- ~ M '" CD ~ .... a;) '" <:0: ',S E 6~ U " o 5 <:.- ~~ o > "0 t; 0.. ~ :E a o U ~ z e <D i':' I'- ~ M '" CD ~ ~ <D i':' I'- ~ M M CD ~ '" a;) ~ CD a;) ~ I'- W ::J -' LL W I '0 C III .r:: ~ <D i':' I'- ~ M '" CD ~ ~ S <D i':' I'- ~ M M CD ~ C o ~ ~ '" <fl C o u >- rn ~ '" C Q) t> '0. '" '0 <fl '" 0. <3 C .<: 0. '0 C III <fl C III 0. <fl '0 ~ III '0 C III 1ii '" '0 ::l U .S 1ii ::l E C '" E '" Qj rn C 'iij ::l o .r:: '" .r:: I- " ::0 '" ~ .~ ll) "E..gp 0.", <t:.c -u ~C II .8 <t:.8 ~ '" ZiJ5 I'- a;) ~ a;) a;) ~ " .. " ..- .. e z.. -E e .. ..- EW -g~ .. E <( W f-- I ro ~ '" ir--.: Ol Ii > f5 Ol B 0- 0 W W W <( <( u u u Z Z <( z ~ z <( z """ ~ >. " " - ...c-;; ~, ~ .- - Ii " :< ;::r3L:.< ;;;.-, "0 "0 "0 " " " " " " ;"::W QIJ QIJ QIJ u~- ~;:J "0 "0 "0 , U " " " "0 " " -' ~ ~ ~ ~ <I: " ClJ- ""2~ Z on:::::e QIJ" " " " " -0 '';:: <I'J " Q) Cl.. (';l "0"" ..i< ..i< ..i< -'< 3.g~ 2~ u u u u :: <I: <I: <I: <I: ;: ('j " I ..i< " -j~ u " <I:~ I ! I , i I --I i "j "0 "0 " " .. 0 QIJ QIJ Ul.c "0 "0 2 " Ul_ ~ .... " ... ... " " ".. " ".c -'< .2 <(~ u u <I: 1<1: < z en u.: - Ul Me <Do ... .- - ... .. ..- -.- a.U .. .c U c o tiu; => Ol ~ ~ 1il=> cO o U) u Ol ... CO'O>. oc", Olll... NcOl ~ .Q> ai g ~i!l N'O.o enOl'" , .c ;: u.-Ol c c CO') ';"~ <D u- "'cO :D.~ Q) ~.~ ~ m ~ Q) .c >..c o e>~ 00)'- -CULL CtJQ)CO ~.!: ~...J :; U c...- .c Q)"en Q) U;: =>~ 00' =..cg5 .E3;o OlOlN .0 <= . o-u.c _0 Ol U) 6 c ra .L:: rn 0 (1) W :B 5:1; me. ...!" Ol u a> ro - Q)' - (.)..c "m en .~ a; LL "' .- () EOlu ~ O:Ec:_ CD O>...J .... CD N .~ -5 .I:.Ol :a r--: 0 en 0<= > CD ..... .~ N u::: c._ ~~ a.E~.....~t5 +-' E q> co 0 .... ID cn(/) OCOI/):JW E .9< u.8 ~ ~ en CD.......... ca mID ......mW-I Q)ro .!9u-:=::: ......... (j)j,.~ menu.. ;;>> ro OOlo1!.Q6 a..u...J......(/)...... ~ .2 ..-:-.!: ~ 0 cgcnQ)-t3LO (0__..- Uu c: .~ .9 coo' "'E m .Q .c -- ............0(1)000 -s: CN.....-'= Q) ;;> Q) Q)-(j) 2E..c;:-:"'Q.) c: Q) U en en OJ Q) Q) ID u.: (I) E c: (I') en - . E.Q6;a~~ ~ rn '00 ..c r- ffi o t .~ 0 '- 0 O)8.E~~,- ro f/J Q).Q m Q) u c: f/) ......c 3= .'3~~~og <I: Z = ~ r-- r-- ~ '" ,..; <D ~ (J) ro ~ o (J) ~ <= .!l! 0- Ol > 'w <= Ol .c Ol a. E o u Ol ro en i 1.0 ~ I ro I:; i ~ I ~ I ~ i1i1[ i1Ji1 1"0 i _ 1:1 Q) <U 'N Q) I N ctl Q) Q) ..-- CflQ) .- Q) Q) ..- ~~ ~~~g ~ ~a~ ~ r ~g (/) 5= oQ)u~ u TIUL[) 0 -c (/)~ Em- ~ c: C") c: Cf) Q) ~. c: 0 CD Ci.~ 0 CD 0 m v '''- <0 ,Q) fJ)'- ....... LL c..OO ll... l.L. N ~ (}5 ~ ~ 5 c; ELL.; c: -0 19 g. .8 0.8 ~ 0.8 _ ~ 0 m w__ NwO~ffim~ c~cgc~cDO ~~ -omu -Q)~-'-"'Ou WIO-W.-..Q,,...-w:::=:::e.... a..(J) ccw ~ - >,...... w E ro E - - ~ E -0 W m - ({) ~2~nO~ri I ~um ~- cu -m wcqw>'~c ~m~Ow'wM~ mO ct nWm"'O~wo WOW0(J)~W~~O~~ mW~ E E 0 I ~ :.a c z c 0 c CI.l ~ 0 C M -- ~ CD n u CD OlOlo~UZOO ONO~ NOM"O _c ~2~ ~ O>NcmzW Z~ZCD"O~ZMm~CW ~ .8 m ~ OJ 0 ~ .- a.. en (() en.& en - W OJ en ,..; Ol"'"' CD E !ll!!! s::: OJ m o~wo = c~c~~~cw ~u ~,~ ~~ ~"""-Em _ '-rn'-c.~~.-o~~ u COlO OJ ~ B.E_lIl~ou~~ E~E~~.croE""",~o~c OJ-~~ CDL-C C ~'OUO w o~~o.-w "Owe. ~mro ~ oo-~OJw'~o 0 o~~Uo~cN~E rouCl.l I OJ ~ 0 .rg UI E > >,N 0 M 0>:' a.. _ u ~ Q) ~ 0 ro _ 0 g Q) 0 0 s::: 0'0.. - ID OJ ~ - - - ~ (J) M - (J) E Q) ::s..... 0 ...... .... o__~ m NroM-.-roo rocroro(J) ro~ ~~~ ccCl.l o~(J) ~ ~ocw~~("") E.QEEw~c~E~s:::~ (J)ro~ N~O :i ~wE~roE~ EQ.)t5Q.)E2g~Q.)~g;~=~ -.::o..~ ~ CI.l wEo~o~~ w o~wE~oU~~ roWCl.l ~~~ ~ ~2~~~~~ ~({)~~~({)~~;~~~~~.~~~ II) ~ CI.l W <D ro (J) ...... > f/J > m ~ . > E 0 c"5 ag ~ cOl u 0 00 ::> :S Co""" c>>1- ~ en - 0 s::: 0 ~ - ~ 0 CD 0 0 u ~ = c ~ g~ '0 ~ R~~~ ~ ~ g ~-E ii ~ e ~ ~ ~ g .~~ i.s. ~ 8 ~~ ot5<D ,C .E~m~=~N c~c......(J);?cm~({)rac~.~~Ee'" '" .- ~ l.L 0 l.L 0 - Q) ....... --.- ~ .- Q) -- m ~ u .- _ III -.. 0 m s::: 0 m x-a o~m~<D~rao <D-W~(J) ID.. . - 0 0Woo E .......~ ~_ M ~f/J~-Q.).~~ ~f/J~'(J)O::So~O ...~ <D~c~r.nc_-roCl.l<l> _ra_>-~..c_8mC::SCOE mo S~-~~~~~ffi~mE~~~~E~~.~~I~c~~~~ro~~~ a. Ol iO ~ -0 ~ 8. ID U .= ro U -, 0 .= ~ .= m Q).e !:: s ~ n; ~ ~ ~<l> 00 "S! Q. ~ C'(I c ~ m 00 0'> ...... ~ s::: ~'C = E...J =>. ~ ~ "0.... ~::::::I s::: ~ -= C 5: ~ 0 u .c en "'0 00 ~ "' CT Q.) ..Q I CT CT C"'O . CT-- ..;::::; ;:: i;::: .= m Q) C co u..c~8"'080~s:::Q.l~::soriQ.).~Q.)mc~Q.l....Q.l~<l>Q)..cgE~..c ....... 0 ro N <( N Q .2;: 0:: 0 ~.t: 00 0:: ra10:: E ro l1.. 0::..E..a ~ 0 E U <( m':= U <7l -- f---f--- --- i --1- - o I o ~ '" o ~ Ol ~ ~ N iO ;S ~ iO r-- 25' r-- ro ~ ~ '" '" '" '" <D <D ~ ~ - '0 Ci) N ~ <D ~ .c ~ r-- r-- ~ '" '" <D ~ .c CD ;::::- r-- ~ '" '" <D ~ '" '" <D Qj 1i III .c U N <= o ~ Ol (f) N '" "" i '" , <D r-- ro (J) '---- _.L -- -- .- ~-_.. " ::0 '" ~ ~ o..gf 0.", <l:..c ~u Z e- II .8 <l:"' ~ '" zVi " " " " " " " " eo eo eo ~ " " " " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 " " " Jj -" -" -" <..) <..) <..) <..) -<: -<: -<: -<: 'iU "C ";: 0 u. ... 0 III :t III ..J "C CIl "C CIl_ CIle ZCIl -s eCll CIl_ sW -g&j CIl S <C ::!; Z <C Z ::!; Z <C Z ",i'g ClIO t)l) tI).c -a &0_..2 CIl CIl ~ ~ ~ 0 "CCIl" "C.c~ <C~< 4-< o .,., .,., >>~ <..) " :.::: ~ o " "" ~ .:g " '" "w ~I- ~ " ~-5 o " -" <..) -<: 4-< o ": >> .~ '0 ""W II- "" " :>0-5 "" " ~ o Jj <..) -<: :.: z en o N , o .... o N "C e III It) o N , o .... o N U) c: u.: -5 I (\I'" ID .......0 c: _Q) OE CD 00 li :;~ _ 0 c Cll.c ...J ~ (/)0 "I""" ('\] Ct::(() :w ~ g....... (0 ::JO 0 Q.l-C: WOO> ns 'S: ->. Q)CCiN .......>U E c. en 1::: :> ~.n I 0 L-. "I""" ro.- o ,.. "'..-o1?O'>Q)criw o..croc.o- ~ ~ g c. :E::" m Q) ..... 0 C ,9- aN....... .... ..- .......taN 0-0= ~~c~Ozro _.Q)~c <0'" C:c.Q RI.~O Q)0l.J:::. .....g-o g~:~ ~~~ 8:g~~~~u~ ~5>~~ Nrororo -000 ~~E~-.~~ OCooo l"OOO.r::. Q):J"CLLQ.Q)==..c>-XC: 'r'~c: .cro" ~__eoCll U...-_Wo 0 . Q('[JQ}\..J .....c::::J CJQ)~\.J=>.:';::; NJBz:U ~ ~ ro -.q- c: m -...J ><.2 >. - CJ..c U .. Q) 0 (IJ aJ--c -CD~m-..:tra Q) 000.0.. ~~.5~ ~aC:~>-Q)~c:~iID ~(I)Q)E .~ro._ Q.lOnltc.>(I)-o.Qc-o. 1..cL-.._ u.~two .......-o-CJ)c:~~-Ow(l) oo~_ Q) co "'0 O"'U.- a. "I"""-CC ~~ow -C1]OofloQ)~Q)._ o.::JQ) ~C:Q) (l)Oc..N"'ID~Wt::~Z N~~E T""Q)........ :5-c.L-.:::J>o OIll'O ..LLcaJ ~CIl -0 ~ = .~ = ~ .m g ~ ~ E Q..~ 3 M - = .= 11l0lCll UlCll ~OWOCll'" 0 Mmw::J ~ .-... ..........Orou..c.__CQ)L-. I ~cr mo~ns cns-..c ""'-0nsOrn o~-oQ) .c c u c: Q) c: :e u 5 a. ~ j; .:: "2 TI C; ~ >. ~ o .~ 0 .2 E 0 .- -q- +:i 0 &. 'tJ Q) m N....... 0 .s _o~:::-c. c:;:::cn ca"O(/)"iiGJ(/)..c ..("')ooc .u _ wI... C. CD C _ ro .... "'C a....!.......... 10....... (/) C ..c ro CD GJ - 0 - _..... CJ 0 ...... I ~-~ (1) ~--u >uca~Oooroo 1(1) OIDQ~ ! ~o..>< g,)(l:; Q c.:J~ E.s!Ciio ~..... Q 0.. ~-IDCD Q)0ID0E -~>ID ocroID cc> rn:>,.cU)c o.sU~'o NO> m ~.- ~ QUO C'a~_ C C'a \- .- c._ ~o~u ~c~ool:;cc-~~wo.. ~om(l)~ OUIDCCIl mm IDID ~ID~wcO (/)etID~EE.2roarn ~(/)ID..c~ m~~ .!1>_-o'- -"OOOCLL":::(/)ooID- OO'-~ -~o..mo..Eta)'ID~.QO -IDoo\-LO :: 0.. u .:J U (/)..c. <Ll <Ll m - c co ~ ~ CD - <Ll 0..0 .QEc~o-ccQQ>o..t!tt= "'0 -.J:~-oE..... ~oo02om:Jxoow_oID~"'OLOOID~oo ........Qu-..Jw...uz(f)Wrn en _mco.......OmON o .... o N Ul cD Ii ~ -co <>IS Me M '" :a COo ~"- :a e: - 0 N ~ .. CIl_ iO iO -.- ~ ~ c.O 0 0 0 0 .. .c 0Cl 0Cl 0Cl 0Cl 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ (") (") (") (") M M M (") <0 <0 <0 <0 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ("OJ (") ~ ~ ::!; Z Ul W Ol c: 11l .c U 00l .S c E 2 -11l ~o.. W w a>.~ Ul Ul Ul c: W w "".c 11l ~ EC. - E 11l 0 "0 U .C Q) ..Q> ~~ _11l Oc Ul w ?:1ii 11l ~ -'Ul N~O o~ "'7Qi o~ ~ 0 o c: ';" 0 w"O 15..-5 11l_ .c .c O?: ::!; Z "0 00 ~ ~ Q) ID 0)2 ]!O)cQ)(f) (llCmQjID "'0 m..c ~ 0) (/) (/) ..co CIDID (llQO)(llmO)O) en 0) c O)..c c c m c .- m Q ro m :J U "E :::::J Q)..c ..c Q)""OOlcUQ co:::.. c.- ~::~~"E:?:? l.... 0 0'-.- 2oc2::"E"E -oID.!:.E-(lll-oO wOE OO?:?: rn (/) .. CIJ C '- I- ID..c .: en..a.E: 0 0 0.. 0 U) . 0 c .!: ~U;u:"-.U;U; E E .. . -~ . .".. enLL::2::=;:LLLLenuj u.:~:::=::o~~~u..: NID.....ID...- CD-t::'t::'t::'CO~""'-N- NCDf'-..f'-..f'-.........-O LO..............-..-LOLON NMM("')MNNM MMMMMMMM <0 co CD <0 CD CD CD co ............-....................-..... C C C C C C C c oo.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q,Q.Q cuuoo't5ooo ID (lJ ID ID ID (l) (lJ ID (l) Eenenenenenenenen w '- . . . . . . . . '5..... N M "'l:t LO ID t'-- co rr w ~ ("OJ 0> ~ ::!; Z Ol .~ "0 ~ o ?: ~ o c:~ .- U E,j!! q rnm2 ~ c: ~oEw en IDc u..: en 0 ~ en~'s ~ w.crr e: ~.S2 Q) "0 .c ~ c: E?:Ol 11l - -.~ . en '" .{genC~LL:? .cu.: ai~~- .Q -~m-Fu "- == 0.(") :?:i - t ~~"'l:tF~ o ctI.- f'-.. f'-.. r:: ~o...~<Ot'--f'-.. ctIM-~MMM -..JCO(l)MMM LO-"- a.CDCOID owE..-.......... 'i'lao555 om 0._._._ "'--..c;moou OO>CVID<U ~CIJ~U)U)(I) 2 ~c . . . o..caJ"-NM ctImcn .c.c~ OUUl <l) ::c '" .~ ~ 0.."" c.;j <c.:: ~u i:c- 11 .8 ..;2 ~ " ze/i (") " I '" , " C> "'- N "'C z'" -E <{ <{ ::'; <{ <{ c'" Z Z Z Z "'- Z I .g~ cm '" E I <C I "j '0 '0 '0 " " " "'0 Ol) Ol) Ol) '0 '0 '0 Ol.c " " ::'; <{ " Ol_ ~ "j; "j; "'''' Z ~ ~ 0 ;2 Z 0 "", " " ".c '" ..;a '" <C~ u u u -< -< -< . <C - Z Ul u: -Ol MC <DO .... ,- - ~ CO "'- -.- a.U CO .c (,) '" o o '" ... o o '" iii u: MUl ~LL ~ '" ~ CO .c U~ 0'" -M OlCD 8~ c c CO 0 .c::U u~ ~ ~ 0) W OJ e ro .cw 0> 0):;:::::; e ro :Ot: '(; .s :!: ~ O~ .~ 0 E,fg roro ~o ro e E Vl Vl We - 0 W ~'OE "c .c Q) o .f:?= i:L .c 5- -:!:w o ~ (/) cri en :!: . e ro LL e ....JM'c .N ro ~ LO a.. 0JC'!Q.l , '" > ~ co '00 o~e NeW ~o.c (1):.0::; Q.) o.~Ci ro Ul E .c 0 10.~ 0 '" ~ ~ e .9 U W Ul -W Vl ::l o .c OJ e .~ .!!1 U Vl '0 o .c o Ul f- 0:: <{ :;; . UlLL o 0 w-' Vl - roO ~I'- .c , ,,-0 w~ .cO _N '0 ~ w2 - "- .!!1ro w.c OU '" ~ M '0 e ro -"!. ~ r::: I'- I'- ~ '" '" CD ~ '" Vl LL e 0 0'0-, :.;:; c: _ .!!!COC'\j rncco 00.9 "";" .S 15 ~ >..!:: 0 mEN ~oiD =0..... E~ ~ ",ro.c 'r"'u 0 w W _ E g-..-- Ci5 >. 5 .-.0 -- ouo -ww :13U) Ul w . u.:1ij2 _ e "'VlW f"--"EE ~ww "?E= gE5- ~ww c E; ~ g O>.Q ~(ijni CI) g.~ Vl- e W'" ::l Vl '" E SuE ; Q) C 0 10::: m 0 i I CD ::'; z <{ z N Ui' I'- ~ '" '" CD ~ ~ iD r::: I'- ~ '" '" CD :a ~ 0' <X) ~ '" M CD I 1m ~ ~ j W OQ.)__ ..coo ..Q:Q en +-' ro ('I') (/) c r.ri ~o <:= C.- c V"owo :;;~u.: aJ01:):.o::; '-~o -E U3 '(j) ~ ~"co ....J +-':::Ic(tj C-M- ~ E 800 co 0 ("') .... _ c: ...c Q) I ~0 ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ll..;:jg 4-0N 0....-::. Q)....... en N . 'E "0 en W .8~~.9 g_~g. cn;;;~-2' (/J go u.:MU)~~ ll.._~..-- .-::.~ t-- .- ....J :0' 2 c co ..- x - i---C 0 ;;.2 ~ ~~ lov 'roE Uw ;:::-u<O(/)~ t-Q)"--Q)O II~w-Ul , CI) c (/)..- '?cO:::lO ,"'?:3uj C"1 '- :;:::::; "0 N ,: MCD t5 .!E <ouoc:"- +-' ....- Q) Q) ro Q) :..-~:..:;:; coocn-li l'c::::J'u o :..:;:; .S '0 ro ,9 fij ~ 1:52-0 >-<3 '13 E'~ Q) c Q).~ Q) en (/)0>-00= - (/)>.c (/)E:..:::QN "O:o~ Q)coom6 IDE:; .~ ID 0 0..:.0::; .~ Q):= 1>>t5Eu >cn..o ! Q) 0 ('\] 0 ID Q) (/) ::J 0::: en_ 0 en 0::: co a... I ..________.,_._.._ __..._ '" :0 '" ~ .~ Il) o.gf 0..", ~..c -u ic II .s ___3 :::, '" zV; , I I'- <X) 2.5 Assessment of Methodology for Concurrency Management Background: Section 163.3191 (2) (P), Florida Statutes, requires the Evaluation & Appraisal Report to provide an assessment of the extent to which changes are needed to develop a common methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing its concurrency management system in coordination with the municipalities and counties, Analysis: The only municipality inside the geographic boundary that comprises Collier County that performs a separate transportation system and concurrency review is the City of Naples, and Marco Island, Naples operates inside of a TCEA. All other jurisdictions within Collier County fall under the County's methodology which is regulated by the adopted TIS Guidelines and consistent with the review performed by the other jurisdictions within the County and FDOT, Continual coordination between the multiple jurisdictions occurs through interaction with the Collier MPO, G P Elements Assessments SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Capital Improvement Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with 'TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, 'The County shall promote...", 'The County shall continue to..." or 'The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Certain Sub-Element references to be renamed, including Sub-Element, Goal and throughout Objectives and Policies Policy 1.4 ~ revision to introduce reducing VMT and GHG emiSSIOns as criterion for further prioritizing projects; revision to provide another option/more options. Policy 1.5 - revisions related to multi-Element revisions in a comprehensive effort to manage redundancy; revision related to 2010 CIE adoption with "Regional Park land" LOSS change from 2.9 to 2,7 acres per I,OOO/population; revisions related to FDOT comments to the DCA. Policy 2,10 reconsider revision recommended that would allow for more-responsive fiscal management, as this Policy remains relevant and should not be changed. Objective 3 - minor revision timeframe reference. Policy 3.1 - minor revisions associated with new terminology. Policy 4.1 - minor revision to provide updated Statutory cite, Policy 4,2 - revision no longer necessary within context of EAR amendments; amendment to provide updated reference cite was made recently as part of2010 CIE adoption (Ordinance No. 10-43), Policy 4.6 - minor revisions associated with new terminology. Policy 4.7 - minor revision to include an additional "best practices" entry. 1 CIE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 5.1 - minor revisions associated with new terminology; may need minor revision to provide updated Statutory cite. 2 CIE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment ofthe Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Capital Improvement Element A. Introduction & Background: The purpose of the Capital Improvement Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. The intent of the Capital Improvement Element is to identify public facilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of such facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund construction or development of the facilities. As such, the Capital Improvement Element is updated annually, including revision of the 5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008 included the initial step toward re-naming of certain Sub-Elements including: from the "Sanitary Sewer" Sub-Element to the "Wastewater Treatment" Sub-Element; from the "Drainage" Sub-Element to the "Stormwater Management" Sub-Element, and; from the "Solid Waste" Sub-Element to the "Solid Waste Disposal" Sub-Element. The new names initially appeared in the Capital Improvement Element as combinations of old and new names as a transition preceding these EAR-based amendments. The new names - no longer in their transitional forms - should be used in all titles, headings and text within this Element, and in all references to these Sub-Elements found throughout the Growth Management Plan. As currently formatted, the Capital Improvement Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting Objectives and Policies. This Goal should be retained as ~Titten, B. Objectives Analysis: OBJECTIVE 1 (PUBLIC FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS): Identify and define types of publiC facilities, establish standards for levels of service for each such publiC facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities is needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policv Relevance: There are five (5) policies within this Objective, Policy 1.4: Public facility improvements are to be considered in the following order or priority: A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of this Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved development orders permitting new development, 3, new development orders pennitting redevelopment, and 4, new development orders pennitting new developments. O. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1, providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. This Policy explains the method for prioritizing public facilities' improvements. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained and revised to add a closing statement associated with the Major Issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, such as, When further considering projects prioritized by this order, the higher priority shaH be assigned to improvements designed to reduce, or not increase, greenhouse gas emissions through shortened vehicular trip lengths, trips taken by another mode of transportation, or by other substantive means, [Public Comment from Februarv 23. 2010 tAR Public MeetiniZ - Suggesting the planning period should be extended beyond ten years.j [PlanniniZ Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUiZust 27. 2010 EAR Worhhov- Suggesting that additional language maybe needed to more clearly provide for the option of not constructing certain improvements at all.] Policy 1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: A. Roadways: 1. Arterials and collector roads: level of Service indicated below on the basis of peak hour, traffic volume: level of Service "E" on all six-lane roads 2. level of Service "0" peak hour on all other County and State arterial and collector roads not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (ClE) B, State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). In Collier County, FOOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: EXISTING RURAL AREA 1-75 B EXISTING URBANIZED AREA C TRANSITIONING URBANIZED AREA C C, County Surface Water Stonnwater Management Systems: 1. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. 2. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage - stormwater management facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design stonn return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, D. County Potable Water Systems: 1. County systems: County Water District = 170 gallons per capita per day 2. Municipal systems: City of Naples = 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area Everglades City = 185 gallons per capita per day in ~he unincorporated service area 3. Private potable water systems I Independent district systems: Water flow design standards as identified in Policy 3.1 of the Potable Water Sub-Element of this Growth Management Plan. Orangetree Utilities = 100 gallons per capita per day Immokalee Water and Sewer District = 105 gallons per capita per day Florida Governmental Utility Authority = 109 gallons per capita per day Ave Maria = 110 gallons per capita per day within service area E. County Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treatment Systems: 1. County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day Southeast Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day Northeast Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day 2. Municipal systems: City of Naples = 145 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area Everglades City = 100 gallons per capita per day 3. Private sanitary sewer - wastewater treatment systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 2,1 of the Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treatment Sub-Element of this Growth Management Plan. 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) Orangetree Utilities = 100 gallons per capita per day Immokalee Water and Sewer District = 100 gallons per capita per day Florida Governmental Utility Authority = 100 gallons per capita per day Ave Maria = 110 gallons per capita per day within service area F. County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: 1. Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three (3) years. 2, Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three (3) years. G. County Parks and Recreation Facilities: 1. Regional Park land 2. Community Park land = 2.9 acres per 1 ,ODD/pop. = 1.2 acres per 1,000/pop, (unincorporated) H. Public School Facilities: 1. Elementary schools 2. Middle schools 3. High schools = 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment / FISH Capacity = 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment I FISH Capacity = 100 percent (1,00) of CSA Enrollment I FISH Capacity This Policy establishes standards for levels of service for each such public facility. This Policy remains essentially relevant and should be retained except for changes discussed below, and those associated with the renaming of certain public facilities and their attendant Sub-Elements. The LOSS for County arterial and collector roads appearing in Policy 1.5, subscction '"A" above is one of two locations within this GMP where th~se standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.3 in the Transportation Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies arc somewhat dissimilar. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. Thc CIE should be considered for this location, with Transportation Policy 1.3 revised to direct the reader to the ClEo If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the ClE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Element entries could elaborate on the figures. The LOSS for State and Federal roads appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection '"B" above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.4 in the Transportation Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are somewhat dissimilar. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Transportation Policy 1.4 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the ClE could be lormatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Element entries could elaborate on the figures. The LOSS for storm water management systems appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection '"C" above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 2.1 in the Stormwater Management Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The ClE should be considered for this location, .J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (ClE) with Stormwater Management Policy 2,1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE, If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures, The LOSS for potable water systems appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "D" above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 3.1 in the Potable Water Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same, These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Potable Water Policy 3.1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures. The LOSS for wastewater treatment systems appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "E" above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 2. I in the Wastewater Treatment Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear, The CIE should be considered for this location, with Wastewater Treatment Policy 2.1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub- Element entries could elaborate on the figures. The LOSS for solid waste disposal facilities appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "F" above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 2.5 in the Solid Waste Sub-Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Solid Waste Sub-Element Policy 2.5 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures. The LOSS for parks and recreation facilities appearing in Policy 1.5, subsection "G" above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1. I in the Recreation and Open Space Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same, These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. The CIE should be considered for this location, with Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 1,1 revised to direct the reader to the CIE. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Element entries could elaborate on the figures. [Public Comments from Februarv 23, 2010 EAR Public Meetinf!- Suggesting that special rural standards should be developedfor land lying east ofCR 951, including development standards, roads, dark skies, etc. Another, suggesting the County has failed to limit growth based on available resources.] [Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetim! - Suggesting minimum Levels of Service Standards should be established for multi-model (and inter-model) needs (inc. public transit, park-n- ride facilities, carpooling, self-propelled modes, and pathways); another, suggesting that the County 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) adopt special rural road section standards, including non-urban standards for right-ofway cross- sections, lighting, landscaping and wata) [Planninf! Commission (CCPC! Comment from AUf!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Supporting staff suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the CIE, with the individual facilities' Elements or Sub-Elements being revised to direct readers to the CIEfor this information.) [Planninf! Commission (CepC) Comment from December 7. 2010 EAR Adoption Hearing _ Recognizing FDOT comments to the DCA and the revisions involved.) OBJECTIVE 2 (FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY): Provide public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, within the County's authority to require others to provide, or as provided by the School District within their financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, formally adopted by the School Board between July 1 and October 1 each year. With the exception of public school facilities, existing public facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and other intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Obiective Achievement Analysis: The purpose of this Objective and its policies is to establish how providing public facilities in accordance with Objective 1 above must be accomplished in a financially feasible manner, This Objective is being achieved and should be retained as written. Policy Relevance: There are ten (10) policies within this Objective. Policy 2.10: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13%, Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. This Policy identifies current bondable revenues and limits the ratio of total debt service to bondable revenues. This limitation may have lost relevance given the economic climate and government's ability to react to market changes in a timely manner. The policy has been in the GMP since its original adoption and based upon the direction given below the policy will not be modified. 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) [{'lannin$! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUJ!Ust 27. 20iO EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting this Policy remains relevant and the County should not consider adjusting its debt service ratio.} OBJECTIVE 3 (PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA): Effective with plan implementation, limit public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area to those facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future land Use Element. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Like all other types of capital improvements, projects located in the Coastal High hazard Area are included in the County's Annual Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, and thus the County's Annual Budget for each fiscal year. The above Objective contains an outdated timeframe reference, but the wording is otherwise acceptable. This Objective should be reworded to remove the timeframe reference and simply refer to the 5- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policv Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective. Policy 3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element including, but not limited to arterial and collector roads, sanitary sewer service - wastewater treatment systems, potable water supply systems, surface water _ stormwater management systems, solid waste -collection and disposal systems, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, and park and recreation facilities. This Policy establishes the County's ability to replace and maintain public facilities in the coastal high hazard area in accordance with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained except for changes associated with the renaming of certain public facilities. OBJECTIVE 4 (PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS): Coordinate County land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements, as described in Policy 1.1 above, by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policv Relevance: There are seven (7) policies within this Objective. Policy 4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually and may also be modified as follows: 7 CAPiTAL iMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CiE) A. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. This Policy provides for modifications to the Schedule of Capital Improvements of the Capital Improvement Element. This Element is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted into law in 2007, as follows: 163.3177(3)(b)l: Requires an annual update to the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to be submitted by December I, 2008 and yearly thereafter. If this date is missed, no comprehensive plan amendments are allowed until the update is adopted. Ch. 2007-204, LOE This Policy remains otherwise relevant and should be retained as revised in accordance with the above Statutory change. Policy 4.6: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Figure PW-1 and Figure PW-1.1 "Collier County Water District Boundaries", and Figure PW-2 and Figure PW-2.1 "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas", in the Potable Water Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, and on Figure SS-1 and Figure SS-1.1, "Collier County Sewer District Boundaries", and Figure SS-2 and Figure SS-2.1, "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas", in the Sanitary Sewer Wastewater Treatment Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. Road and Public School improvements will be provided as designated in their respective Schedule of Capital Improvements appearing in this Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a countywide availability basis. This Policy limits the provision of public facilities to within specific service areas identified in other Elements or Sub-Elements of the GMP or in accordance with the Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained except for changes associated with the renaming of certain public facilities and their attendant Sub-Elements.as written. Policy 4.7: The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re-building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not be limited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; b. Maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation; c. Installation of on-site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; 8 CAPiTAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) d. Beach and dune restoration, re-nourishment, or emergency protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events; e. Emergency road repairs; and, f. Repair andlor replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls. This Policy requires the County to adhere to best practices in providing public facilities. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Plannin$! Commission (CCPC) Comment tram AUl!Ust 27. 20iO EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that an additional best practice entry should be included in the listing, such as "All governing construction codes ".} OBJECTIVE 5 (CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT): Ensure that public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. Policv Relevance: There are six (6) policies within this Objective. Policy 5.1 : The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treatment, Drainage Stormwater Management and Solid Waste Disposal level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if anyone of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System is met: A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur, pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes. This Policy provides criteria for establishing concurrency specific to potable water, wastewater treatment, stormwater management and solid waste disposal facilities and services. This Element may be affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted into law in 2005, as follows: 9 CAPiTAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) 163.31 77(3)(a)5: Required the comprehensive plan to include a 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Outside funding (i.e., from a developer, or other government or funding pursuant to referendwn) of these capital improvements must be guaranteed in the form of a development agrcement or interlocal agreement. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained except for changes associated with the renaming of certain public facilities and their attendant Sub-Elements. Explicitly specifying an "interlocal agreement" as the other source of outside funding for capital improvements mayor may not require revision of this Element to be in compliance with the above Statutory change. [Public Comment from March 15. 2010 E4R Public Meetin$! - Suggested that 'pathways' be added to requirements for concurrency} 10 CAPiTAL iMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EV ALUA nON & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Transportation Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, 'The County shall promote...", 'The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Policy 3.3 Modification to state corridor width evaluated on a case by case basis. Policy 3.4 Modifications to provide more flexibility in policy. Policy 3.5 Revision to eliminate time frame for achieving policy. Policy 4.1 Revision to be consistent with policy 4.3 Policy 4.6 Addition to policy to address HB697. Policy 5.1 Revision to provide clarification and applicability of policy. Policy 5.3 Modifications to provide expanded applicability of policy. Policy 5.4 Revision to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and SB360. Policy 5.5 Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TDM strategies. Policy 5.6 Modifications to provide for monitoring success of TDM strategies and language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and SB360. Policy 5.8 Modification to improve effectiveness of policy. 1 Transportation Element Summary Policy 5.9 Policy 6.3 Policy 6.5 Policy 7.3 Policy 7.4 Policy 7.5 Policy 9.3 Policy 11.2 Policy 12.8 Objective 13. Deletion based upon action accomplished. Revisions to provide clarity to policy. Revisions to update list of projects identified. Modifications to expand applicability of policy. Modifications to recognize the requirement to implement HB697. Revision to recognize on-going efforts of the policy. Revision to provide clarity of policy. Revision to require the BCC review and approve the requested Airport Authority Master Plan Deletion based upon transit systems exempt from concurrency. The County shall evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element in the Growth Management Plan. 2 Transportation Element Summary Brief Assessment of Successes & Shortcomings for the Transportation Element A. Introduction & Backgrouud: The purpose of the Transportation Element, as stated in its Goal, is :To plan for, develop and operate a safe, efficient, and cost effective transportation system that provides for both the motorized and non- motorized movement of people and goods throughout Collier County." In order to accomplish this goal, the Transportation Element incorporates data and recommendations from the following reports, plans and studies: .:. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan 2030 Financially Feasible Plan and 2030 Needs Plan. .:. MPO Urban Area Transportation Study. .:. Collier County Transportation Work Program, FY 2010 - FY 2014. .:. 2030 Traffic Circulation Map. .:. Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. .:. Airport Master Plans for lmmokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport. .:. Public Transportation Development Plan. .:. Collier County Master Mobility Plan. The Transportation Element is closely linked to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The land development pattern, as outlined in the FLUE, necessitates improvements and expansion to the County's transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for this reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DR!, PUD, other rezone, and conditional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the appropriate County review agencies. As an alternative to this scenario of the transportation system reacting to new demands created by changes to land development patterns, the County has begun to explore ways to allow the roadway system to guide the pattems and densities of future land development. The County can determine the type of roadway system it wishes to maintain at some adopted level of service and then can take steps to permit only the types, intensities and location of land uses that will be consistent with that system. Through use of this "checkbook concurrency" process, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for transportation services from outstripping the capacity of the roadway system. As part of the Transportation Element, the County has established minimum acceptable level of service standards for the existing County Road system. For County facilities, the level of service standard 1 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing to be maintained is either "D" or .'E," as measured on a peak hour basis. Several State facilities have been given a minimum LOS "E" standard. In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County has implemented a "real time" "checkbook accounting" concurrency management process. B. Objectives Analysis: As currently formatted, this Element consists entirely of a Goal (Goal I ), Objectives and Policies. As part of the EAR-based amendments, fonnatting changes consisting of the addition of a brief introductory statement for the Element and removal of the "I" from the Goal will transpire, so that it is simply the Goal ofthe Element C. Objectives: Objective 1 - The County will maintain the major roadway system at an acceptable level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective requircs the County to adopt and maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards for the County Roadway System, to annually review and adjust such standards, and to coordinate County road improvements with the road improvement programs operated by neighboring jurisdictions. The tasks includcd within this Objective are ongoing through implementation of projects from the 5-year work program as identified by the projected deficiencies table included in thc AUlR. Therefore, this Objective will be retained as written Objective 2 - The County shall maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified in the Five (5) Year Work Program. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Ibe County demonstrates its success in maintaining adopted Levels of Service through data provided in the AUIR. This Objective also incorporates the County's Five-Year Work Program into the Transportation Element. It has been left without a date reference so as to be able to incorporate the Five-Ycar Work Program current at any time. This Objective will be retained as currently written. Objective 3 - The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program and/or the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted long-Range Transportation Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective calls for the preservation of right-of-way for ongoing and future road improvements. This Objective is sufficiently generic that it allows the County Transportation 2 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing Division to protect and acquire rights-of-way as an ongoing program. This IS pending incorporation into the LDC. This Objective will be retained as currently written. Policy 3.3 - The County shall acquire a sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate arterial and collector roads of no less than a cross section of six (6) traffic lanes, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, a shoulder sufficient for pull offs, and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Through use of the LRTP and 5-year work pro!,'Tam roadway corridors necessary to support the future needs are identified and programmed for funding. Utilization of the LRTP helps to determine if a future ROW width of less than that required to support 6 lanes is an appropriate option. This policy will be retained as written. Since the horizon year used in each update of the LRTP is not the expected build-out of Collier County, staff recommends that this policy be retained and corridor width be reevaluated on a case by case basis and not be based solely on the needs limited by the LRTP. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25,2010 EAR WorksholJ - replace "of no less than a cross section of six (6) traffic lanes" with "as appropriate to meet the needs of the LRTP". Policy 3.4 - Collier County shall acquire rights-of-way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners based upon a recommendation from the Transportation Administrator. PoIicv Achievement Analvsis: This acquisition language doesn't just apply to lands we condenm or purchase, but also needs to better apply to lands granted or gifted to us. The GMP needs to allow for public access easements, rights-of-way, etc. that are granted without forcing these facilities to be obtained in fee simple. Collier County recommends revising "acquire" to "purchase" and recommends deletion of "based upon a recommendation from the Transportation Administrator. " Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUJ!Ust 25, 20iO EAR WorksholJ - remove "based upon a recommendation from the Transportation Administrator" from the end of the existing policy. 3 Transportation Element Updated far January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing Policy 3.5 - Within one year of the effective date of this amendment, the County shall prepare and adopt a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations Policv Achievement Analvsis: The County is working towards adoption of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations. Suggestions include omitting the "within one year" requirement, and simply state that the County is implementing a TCPP. Collier County recommends revisions to this policy. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25. 20JO EAR WorksholJ - The CCPC would like a timeframefor accomplishing the policy and not to leave it open ended. Objective 4 - The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The stated purpose of the County's Comprehensive Pathway Plan is to promote walking and bicycling as integral components of Collicr County's local, regional and state recreation and transportation programs. That having been stated, the Program is responsible for maintaining and cxtending the County's bike lanes, sidewalks, and recreational paths. The program has been active for approximately ten (10) years, and relies on a Pathways Advisory Committee to make recommendations as to potential projects, priorities and even Planned Unit Development Applications. Additionally, the comprehensive pathways plan; which outlines goals, objectives and policies, and prioritizcs pathway projects, has undergone recent updates. This Objective should be retained as written. Policy 4.1 - The County shall incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into this Transportation Element by reference and shall periodically update the Pathways Plan as needed. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains to be modified as suggested by the CCPC below. The County has incorporated the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into this Transportation Element by reference and shall periodically update the Pathways Plan as needed. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25. 20JO EAR WorksholJ - Replace "shall" with "should to be consistent with policy 4.3. 4 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing Policy 4.5 - The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work Program. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text to be modified as suggested by the CCPC below. The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work Program. Collier County Transportation Planning secures millions of dollars in funding every year from agencies as identified in this policy. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Remove "to the greatest extent possible" from the policy. Policy 4.6 - The County shall work to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse Gas Emission bv providinQ for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through implementation of its land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate bike lanes. sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Policy Achievement Analvsis: The County provides for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and incorporates bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in all new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Staff recommends that this policy be modified to include_consideration ofHB697. Objective 5 - The County shall coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future land Use Map. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County Comprehensive Planning staff regularly coordinates with Transportation Planning staff on transportation considerations related to proposed GMP Amendments. The two staffs work together annually with regard to the County's Annual Update & Inventory Reports (AUIRs). During the past three years, the staffs have worked together on the amendments establishing the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE, the update of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the update of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (ongoing), the proposed extension of Wilson Boulevard into the Rural Fringe Area, and the establishment of the County's checkbook concurrency provisions. The County has acted consistent with this Objective. Therefore, the Objective should be retained as written. Policy 5.1 - The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future land 5 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. Policy Achievement Analysis: Additional language that clarifies .'significantly impacted road segment" in regards to the County adopted 2%-2%-3%, and which clarifies "deficient" should be added to this policy. It is also recommend that language cstablishing what "mitigation" is, and specifically how it should be applicd (in measurable terms) be added. It should also detail what happens when mitigation allows a project to be "consistcnt" with this policy. Collier County recommends revisions. Policy 5.3 -In order to determine vesting, where desired, all previously approved projects must go through a vesting review pursuant to Subsection 10.02.07.8.6. of the land Development Code. Policy Achievement Analysis: Policy 5.3 requires the County to conduct a Traffic Impact Vesting Affirmation Rcview to determine which developments arc vested for concurrency, the schedule of when these developments will be built and the magnitude of traffic that will be generated by these developments. This review was completed, and information from the review was used to provide back~,'Tound data and analysis relative to the County's Transportation Concurrency Management Area and Concurrency Exception Arca amendments. Collier County recommends revisions. Consider allowing the County the ability to provide vesting detcrminations on projects that arc under review and that are beyond the build-out date stated in their TIS. Policy 5.4 - Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South US. 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements. so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the set procedures. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, 6 Transportotion Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the set procedures. Staff recommends that this policy be modified to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and SB360. Policy 5.5 - Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification from the Transportation Planning Department that at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions - Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation must provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department that at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized. Monitoring of the use of the TDM strategies must be included in the annual monitoring report and modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Staff recommends that this policy be modified to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with HB697 and SB360. Policy 5.6 - The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (Map TR-5). East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR-6). Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions - Commercial developments within the TCMA must provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department that at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized. Monitoring of the use of the TDM strategies must be included in the annual monitoring report and modifications to the applied TD M strategies may be made within the first three years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Staff recommends that this policy be modified to include language outlining consistency of mitigation with Policy 5.5, HB697, and SB360. 7 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing Policy 5.8 - Should the TIS for a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1 % of the maximum service volume at the adopted lOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a congestion mitigation payment shall be required Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions - these needs to refer to an annually updated map that defines what the County's recognized hurricane evacuation links are, so the failing ones can be identified. That map MUST he directly related to the AUIR to make this effective. Congestion Mitigation Payment needs to he defined much more clearly. (NEW) Policy 5.9 - Local governments shall adopt by December 1, 2006 a method for assessing proportionate fair-share mitigation options. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends deleting this policy - this has been completed and follows the model developed by FDOT as required by December I, 2005. The process is clearly outlined in the County's TIS guidelines. Objective 6 - The County shall coordinate the transportation element with the plans and programs of the state. region. and other local jurisdictions. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective requires the Collier County Transportation Division to coordinate with the transportation programs of other governmental entities. Collier County Transportation staff coordinates with transportation planning and improvement programs implemented by municipalities, neighboring counties, thc Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Transportation, and the Federal Highway Administration, and will continue to do so. This Objectivc will be retained as writtcn. Policy 6.3 - The Transportation Element shall be consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system within the City of Naples. Everglades City and the City of Marco Island. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.3 requires the County to "he consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system within the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island." The Policy has to do with estahlishing and maintaining connections between County and City roads. However, the original intent of this Policy is unclear. For instance, it could apply to the roadway connections themselves, or it could apply to administrative policies or guidelines. The EAR-based amendments should include modification of this policy for clarity. 8 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing Policy 6.5 - The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a grade separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The above projects are now in the MPO Transportation Improvement Program along with the six-Ianing of Golden Gate Parkway. The County shall insure that the three projects mentioned above will be fully coordinated in timing and design. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The projects listed in this policy have been completed and renders this policy obsolete. Collier County recommends revision of the projects listed to include; 1-75/Everglades Interchange; US- 411SR-CR951 grade separated overpass; and RandalllImmokalee grade separated overpass. (NEW)Policy 6.6 - Collier County shall encourage emergency egress be permitted at all temporary access facilities. Objective 7 - The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and shall encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation through the development review process. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective requires the County to develop and adopt standards for onsite and external traffic circulation as part of the development review process. The County has adopted such standards and they are applied to rezoning applications and site development permitting for all proposed development within Collier County. This Objective will be retained as written. Policy 7.3 - The County shall implement. through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for both motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review of Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development application review process. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 7.3 requires the County to implement "the provision of safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development applications process." Such provisions have been adopted through the County's Zoning Code and are periodically reviewed and updated consistent with established transportation planning criteria. This Policy should be revised to include coordination with County Engineering staff where traffic circulation is outside of the limits of the public ROW. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUl!ust 25, 20iO EAR WorksholJ -- Replace the word "shalf" with "may" at the beginning of the policy. 9 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing Policy 7.4 - The County shall develop corridor management plans that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the recommendations of the Community Character Plan, County-sponsored Smart Growth initiatives, and the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County Commissioners may periodically appropriate funding for these plans. Policy Achievement Analysis: Policy 7.4 requires the County to develop Corridor Management Plans for certain roadways. There is a similar requirement within the Future Land Use Element (see Scction ISH of this report). The FLUE provision lists corridors that could be subject to such plans. Collier County recommends amending this to underline the importance of the 'smart growth' portion of the policy (i.e. direct the County to adopt and implement smart growth policies). Also to require that any developments that are approved must meet smart growth objectives. Suggest coming up with a list of them, similar to the TDM strategies above. Policy 7.5 - The County shall develop Corridor Access Management Plans. Such plans shall be designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. The development of such plans shall consider the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs). as may be appropriate. Policy Achievement Analysis: Policy 7.5 requires the development of Corridor Access Management Plans. Such a plan has been implemcnted. An EAR-based amendment should include modification of this Policy by changing the first sentcnce to read "The County has developed and shall continue to cffectively implement a Corridor Access Managcment Policy." Objective 8 - The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management System" for the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Sections 2.2 through 2.4 of this report rcview issues rclated to Transportation Concurrency Management. Prior to 2003, County staff reviewed all PUD and DRl Applications for compliance with transportation concnrrency provisions. As part of the review process, proposed projects were assesscd for their transportation impacts and mitigation requirements were assigned to these projects on a case-by-case basis. This system was adcquate for evaluating individual projects but did not adequately assess the combined impact of all development on the County's road system. 10 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing During 2003, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a "checkbook concurrency system." This system examines the total trip capacity available for new development and includes provisions relative to vested traffic. As part of the process of establishing the checkbook concurrency system, the County has recently adopted amendments to the Transportation Element, Future Land Use Element and Capital Improvement Element that establish two Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) and a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). This Objective will be retained as written. Objective 9 - The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions, the NTMP shall consider the impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems (from a level-of-service and operational standpoint). Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective was adopted in November 2002. It cssentially established a program of neighborhood traffic calming measures that can be implemented by a public petition process (from affected residents to the Board of County Commissioners). It has successfully slowed traffic in certain portions of the County where neighborhood streets were being used as "cut- throughs" between two major roadways. This Objective will be retained as written. Policy 9.3 - The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The Collier County Transportation Division shall develop guidelines, which identify the conditions that would require the interconnection of two neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. Policy Achievement Analysis: This Policy needs to better define the term "feasible". Also, policies in Objective 70fthe GMP, not including the Transportation Element, addresses interconnection and should be defined in relation to Policy 9.3. Objective 10 - The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public. Obiectiye Achievement Analysis: This Objective is a catchall for County transportation programs that operate within Collier County's rural areas. As such the Objective is intended to cover policies that deal with a range of different transportation tasks. Staff recommends that this Objective be revised to read "The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public that remains consistent with the character ofthe rural areas of Collier County". 11 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing Objective 11 - The County shall maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and environmentally compatible facilities, consistent with the approved Airport Master Plan for each Airport. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County owns and operates three (3) airports: Immokalee Regional Airport, in Immokalee; Everglades Airpark, in Everglades City; and Marco Island Executive Airport, located three miles north of the City of Marco Island in southwestern Collier County. Each of the airports is required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to prepare and periodically update an Airport Master Plan that details facility needs and proposed expansions or changes for each airport. The purpose of the above Objective is to incorporate (by reference) these Airport Master Plans into the Transportation Element. This Objective will be retained as written. Policy 11.2 - The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy I 1.2 gives the Collier County Airport Authority responsibility for future facility planning, consistent with the Airport Master Plans. Staff recommends that this policy be revised to require the BOCC review and approve the requested Airport Authority Master Plan. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUlZust 25. 2010 EAR WorkshOlJ - Replace "Collier County Airport Authority" with "Collier County Board of County Commissioners ". The Airport Authority only makes recommendations to the Board. Policy 11.3 - The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has assisted Everglades City in obtaining Federal funds to enable the City to maintain and operate the Everglades Air Park. Given the assistance provided to Everglades City by the MPO, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall coordinate with the Everglades City Council to ensure a safe and orderly transfer of the Everglades Airpark and all related facilities to Everglades City for use as a public airport only. Such transfer shall be in a manner that does not compromise the safety of the Airpark and the future facility plans authorized by the Everglades Airpark Master Plan. In the event the Airpark ceases operation or ceases to operate as a public Airpark, the Airpark property will revert back to Collier County. Conditions of a transfer and reverter provisions will be set forth in a transfer document or the deed for transfer. Policv Achievement Analysis: Collier County recommends text remains due to transfer of Everglades Airpark has not transpired, but discussions between the County and Everglades City is still in-progress. 12 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUl!Ust 25, 20iO EAR WorksholJ - The CCPC would like staff to check on the status of the transfer and the results will dictate how the policy is modified. Objective 12 - The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective is the location for all policies related to planning, operation, coordination and expansion of the Collier Area Transit (CAT) System. The CAT System is administered through the County's Traffic Operations & Alternative Transportation Modes Department with the aid of other Departments within the County's Transportation Administration (see the policies below). The CAT System began operation in February 2001 and in its first twelve months of service, provided over 211,000 passenger trips. Ridership has grown since that time. Therefore, this Objective will be retained as written. Policy 12.8 - Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of service standard for transit facilities. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 12.8 requires the transit development plan to include "an acceptable level of service standard for transit facilities." The adopted plan does include several such levels of service standards, to be used as indicators of the effectiveness and efficiency of the County Transit System. Additionally, staff notes that Section 163.3180 (4) (b), Florida Statutes, was amended in 2001 to exempt transit systems from concurrency. Therefore, staffrecommends that the EAR-based amendments include deletion of this Policy. Obiective 13 - The County shall evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element in the Growth Manaaement Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This proposed new Objective shall evaluate and take into consideration the expansion of multi-modal transportation systems. This objective shall create a set of policies that are consistent with increased use of alternative modes of transportation, appropriate mitigation for development creating significant impacts to the transportation network, and full consistency with the goals and objectives of HB697. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Develop a policy that states the County shall develop a Mobility Element to the GMP based upon the conclusion of the Master Mobility Plan to give alternative means of transportation an equal footing within the GMP. 13 Transportation Element Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption Hearing _____'_%.._._M~...._..__._ SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Public Facilities Element - Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", 'The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. To be renamed, including Sub-Element, Goal and throughout Objectives and Policies Objective I - minor revisions to provide new departmental references; reformatting Policy 1.1 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 1.3 -- consider revision to set new review and reporting requirements. Policy 1.4 - may need an updated Ordinance cite. Policy 1.5 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 1.7 - minor revision to provide updated Ordinance cite. Objective 2 - reformatting. Policy 2.1 - minor revisions to reconcile figures and be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan; part ofrevision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy. Policy 2.4 - minor revision to reference earlier Policy. Objective 3 - reformatting. 1 SANITARY SEWER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 3.1 -- revise/augment to introduce new Policy regarding private wastewater facilities. Objective 4 - reformatting. Policy 4.7 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Objective 5 - consider modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions; reformatting. Policy 5.3 - minor revision to provide new agency reference; may need an updated/clearer Policy cite. Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element - Attached Documents - Numerous changes, with direction to cross- check GMP locations where similar references to maps & figures are found. - Additional changes to Figure SS-I and related Figures to reflect District boundary changes associated with RFMUD Sending Lands boundary adjustments - two main areas; I on south side of Immokalee Road. 2 SANITARY SEWER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Public Facilities Element - Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element A. Introduction & Background: The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows: TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES AND SERVICES. The intent of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element is to assure the provision of efficient and economical services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for wastewater management while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, EA.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The provision of public facilities and services for wastewater treatment is planned in correlation with future land use projections. The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008 included the initial step toward re-naming ofthis Sub-Element from the "Sanitary Sewer" Sub-Element to the "Wastewater Treatment" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all titles, headings and text within this Sub-Element, and in all references to this Sub-Element found throughout the Growth Management Plan. As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting Objectives and Policies. As part of the EAR-based amendments, Comprehensive Planning staff is recommending specific formatting changes for the Sub-Element. In addition, the Sub-Element contains a number of references to the County's Water & Sewer District. The District's official name is the "Collier County Water-Sewer District", and the Sub-Element text needs to reflect this. B. Objectives Analysis: OBJECTIVE 1: The County will implement the following policies to make certain that public and private sector sanitary sewer service utilities provide, repair andlor replace sanitary sewer collection, treatment and disposal facilities to correct existing deficiencies in their respective service areas, as may be required to meet or exceed the Level of Service Standards established in this Plan. In addition, public sector sanitary sewer service utilities will be expanded as necessary to provide for future growth. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective concerns both private and public utilities. Collier County s private water and wastewater utilities are regulated through the Utility/Franchise Regulation Section of the Community Development & Environmental Services (CDES) Operations Department. This agency serves as staff for the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority. The Utility/Franchise Regulation Section is the County entity responsible for monitoring compliance with County regulations by private utilities. 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT In addition to managing the operations o{the Department and Section. the CDES Operations Director is also the Executive Director for the Water and Wastewater Authority. In regulating the operations of the County.v private utilities the Authority. which is appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. exercises considerable power. They may set rates, adjust franchise boundaries, set quality of service standards and intervene in di.\putes between utilities and customers. The publicly owned (as opposed to privately-owned) wastewater collection system is operated by Collier County through the Collier County Water-Sewer District. The District is responsible for developing, operating and maintaining the County s public facilities related to wastewater treatment and collection. Bascd on the abovc, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective" and specific references to County Departments and Sections should reflect CDES' recent reorganization, including the Operations and Regulatory Management Department [and Director], of the Growth Management Division. Policv Relevance: There are seven (7) policies within this Objective. Policy 1.1: Continue the development of the Collier County Water-Sewer District consistent with the Capital Improvements Element to provide for future growth. This Policy calls for the continuing development of the County's Water-Sewer District. This Policy remains relevant and should be rewritten not to be utility .\pecijic, but to mention those jurisdictions, generally, that have a wastewater treatment or sewer district or service to develop consistent with the GMP. Policy 1.3: The Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority (Authority), established by County Ordinance Number 96-6, regulates the operations of private sector wastewater treatment utilities that provide sanitary sewer services to portions of unincorporated Collier County. All such private sector sanitary sewer service providers are required to meet the County's adopted wastewater treatment Level of Service (LOS). All private sector sanitary sewer service providers shall file an annual statement with the Authority that provides current operating information including, but not limited to: a statement of current policies and service criteria, the LOS maintained by the service provider and whether such level of service meets the County's LOS Standard for wastewater treatment. The annual report shall also document any necessary or projected facility expansion andlor replacement projects that are required to correct observed deficiencies. This Policy requires, to the extent of County authority, private wastewatcr treatment utilities to report current operating information and proposed system expansions or modifications to the County, including a statement as to how the proposed activity is consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARYSEWER SUB-ELEMENT {Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that meeting these requirements should come at no cost to the County. The CCPC also suggests considering a combination of I-year reporting, and 5-year reviewing, requirements.} Policy 1.4: For any new structure in which plumbing fixtures are to be installed and which is proposed to be connected to a private sector sanitary sewer service utility, the developer is required to provide a letter of adequate capacity from that private utility to the Collier County Building Review and Permitting Department at the time of application for the first building permit, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance Number 80-112. This Policy requires developers intending to connect to private wastewater treatment or sanitary sewer facilities to demonstrate such facilities will provide them with adequate capacity. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. Policy 1.5: Collier County shall permit development of package sewage treatment plant systems in areas identified in Policy 1.2, on an interim basis until County service is available. The County shall allow individual septic systems within the County only when connection to an existing central system is not within 200 lineal feet of the closest property line. In portions of the County where septic systems are allowed, at such time as County or other central sewer service becomes available within 200 lineal feet of the property line, said septic systems will be required to connect to the appropriate central sanitary sewer system. Within the Rural Lands Stewardship Overlay, consistent with Policy 1.2: septic systems are permitted within Hamlets; septic systems mayor may not be permitted in Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size depending upon the permitted uses in the Compact Rural Development; and, septic systems are not permitted in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size. However, in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size, septic systems are allowed to serve no more than 100 acres, on an interim basis only, until central service is available. This Policy allows development of new or expanded wastewater treatment and sanitary sewer systems in certain portions of unincorporated Collier County on an interim basis. It also allows the use of individual septic systems in areas where County or other central wastewater treatment service is unavailable. This Policy remains relevant but should be revised to replace "until County water service is available" with "until a centralized wastewater treatment system service is available". This includes mapping changes and new map information derivedfrom the private, or smaller. providers or districts. Policy 1.7: Where Community Development Districts, or similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, sewer service shall be connected to the regional system, and all facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water-Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance Number 01- 57, adopted October 23,2001, and District construction and operating policies. This Policy requires Community Development Districts, or other special infrastructure districts, to connect to the County Utility System when they are located within the Collier County Water-Sewer 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT District Service Area, and remains relevant. An Ordinance cite is outdated and this Policy should be revised to replace "Ordinance Number 01-57, adopted October 23, 2001" with "Ordinance Number 04-31, adopted May 11, 200r. OBJECTIVE 2: No development order shall be issued by Collier County without sanitary sewer facility capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum Level of Service Standards established herein is available or will be available to serve the development under the guidelines established for concurrency in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective is the County's concurrency provision for wastewater treatment capacity. The Collier County Water-Sewer District achieves concurrency of its stated LOS standard. The disclosure of this achievement is reported within the periodic updates of the County's Wastewater Master Plan. This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, only if rewritten. This Objective should be reformatted to separate the portion that reads as an "objective" from the portion that reads as a "policy" into the individual "Objective 2" and Policy "2.0.1". Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective. Policy 2.1: The following Level of Service (LOS) standards are hereby adopted and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development: FACILITY SERVICE AREA LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD Collier County Facilities North Sewer Service Area South Sewer Service Area Southeast Sewer Service Area Northeast Sewer Service Area 145 gpcd 100 gpcd 120 gpcd 120 gpcd Marco Island Sewer District Marco Shores 100 gpcd City of Naples Facilities Unincorporated Service Area 145 gpcd Everglades City Facilities Unincorporated Service Area 100 gpcd Independent Districts Orangetree Utilities Immokalee Water and Sewer District Florida Governmental Utility Authority 100 gpcd 100 gpcd 100 gpcd 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMtiVT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT Private Sector Systems. . The standards hereby adopted are the sewage flow design standards in Chapter 64E-6008, Florida Administrative Code, unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners to address economic, social and construction method variations between individual systems. This Policy establishes Level of Service (LOS) standards for various Collier County wastewater treatment facilities, both public and private. This Policy should be revised to update the Level of Service Standards, as the Collier County Facilities North Sewer Service Area LOSS is now 120 gpcd. The Policy should be revised to indicate the LOS standard for Ave Maria Water and Wastewater facilities, which are inside the County. The LOSS for wastewater treatment appearing in Policy 2.1 above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5, subsection "E" in the Capital Improvement Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures. This Policy will remain relevant in its reconciled format. [Planninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!ust 27, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Supporting staff suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the ClE, with this Sub-Element being revised to direct readers to the ClE for this information.] Policy 2.4: The County shall annually review historical sanitary sewer demand records and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 2.1, if so indicated by said annual review. This Policy remains relevant and requires an annual review of wastewater treatment demand records, with adjustment of the LOS Standards, as necessary, based upon the findings of the annual review. This Policy should be revised to replace "County" with "Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority", and add a second sentence, such as, "The Collier County Water-Sewer District shall review historical sanitary sewer demand records during Collier County Wastewater Master Plan updates and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 2.1, if needed." and retained as rewritten. OBJECTIVE 3: The County will continue to ensure utilization of environmentally sound and economically beneficial methods for disposal of treated sludge and septage, and shall also ensure that such practices are followed by private utilities regulated by the County. 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective ensures the County will employ appropriate sludge and septage disposal practices involving both public and private services. This Objective is being achieved and as such, it should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policv Relevance: Policy 3.1: The County shall maintain sludge de-watering and stabilization facilities for use by County wastewater treatment operations to produce sludge de-watered and stabilized to a degree suitable for use as cover material for County landfills or to be used for any suitable manner that is permitted by law. The County shall ensure that private wastewater utilities regulated by the County follow such practices. This Policy remains relevant and rcquires sludge de-watering and stabilization facilities to be included in all County wastewater treatment plants. The facilities are required to produce sludge de-watered and stabilized to a degree suitable to enable its use as cover material for County landfills or to be used for any suitable manner that is permitted by law. The stabilization facilities at the North County Water Reclamation Facility were abandoncd in ] 999 due to odor concerns. The County currently hauls biosolids to a sanitary landfill on an interim basis until biosolid stabilization facilities can be obtained to meet FAC Chapter 62-640 and USEPA 40 CFR Part 503. This Policy should be retained as written. As part of the EAR-based amendments, thc County proposes a new Policy requiring private sludge and septage to be treated prior to its disposal to a degrce equivalent to that employed at the County facilities. OBJECTIVE 4: The County will continue to promote the use of treated wastewater effluent for irrigation purposes in order to provide an environmentally sound disposal method and to conserve potable water and groundwater supplies by developing and implementing an integrated, comprehensive strategy for the following Policies. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective is being achieved and commits the County to promoting the use of reclaimed water as an irrigation source for suitable properties. This language is similar to language contained in Objective 1.4 of the Potable Water Sub-Element (refer to the Potable Water Section of this Report). The County has an active reclaimed water irrigation program. Therefore staff recommends retention of this Objective, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policv Relevance: There are seven (7) policies within this Objective. The Objective and policies are similar to Objective 4 and its policies within the Potable Water Sub-Element (refer to the Potable Water Section of this Report). 6 PUBLIC F:4CJLITlES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT Policy 4.7: The County shall seek to expand the availability of irrigation water from supplemental sources through connection of such sources to the County's reclaimed water system. This Policy remains relevant and requires that dual water systems within Community Development Districts, other special districts, and Planned Unit Developments be connected to the Regional (County) system, at such time as the system is available for such connection. This Policy should be deleted or rewritten to not be utility specific. OBJECTIVE 5: The County will discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector sanitary sewer service suppliers in an effort to maximize the use of existing public facilities through the development order approval process by implementing the following policies. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective is being achieved and seeks to discourage urban sprawl through maximization of existing public wastewater treatment utilities. Further, the Objective states that this action will be achieved through the local development review process. The Public Utilities Engineering Department coordinates with the Zoning & Land Development Review Department in the review of development order applications to ensure that the requirements of this Objective are met. Therefore, this Objective should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697. Policv Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective. The Objective and policies are similar to Objective 5 and its policies within the Potable Water Sub-Element (refer to the Potable Water Section of this Report). Policy 5.3: As provided for in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, and in Policy 1.2, central sewer facilities are permitted in Towns, Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments. Though not anticipated, it is possible that central sanitary sewer collection lines may extend through lands not designated as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development; no properties designated other than as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development are permitted to connect to these collection lines. Under criteria, properties may be eligible for central sanitary sewer service from Collier County Utilities, or a private sector utility or independent district, within the Receiving Areas identified in the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, depicted on the Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas map (Figure SS-2) of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-element, subject to availability. Qualifying criteria shall be limited to the requirements and incentives established in the Future Land Use and Conservation and Coastal Management Elements of this Plan to obtain preservation standards established for environmentally sensitive lands in the Sending Areas of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Criteria for central sanitary sewer service eligibility may include, but are not limited to, plans for development which utilize creative planning techniques such as clustering, density blending, rural villages, and TDRs from identified environmentally sensitive areas. Criteria for 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT eligibility may be amended and additional Sending and Receiving Lands may be designated in the future. Central Sanitary Sewer collection lines, within the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, may extend through Sending Lands; however, no properties designated as Sending Lands may connect to the collection lines. This Policy remains relevant and contains the conditions for connection of development within the RLSA and the Rural Fringe to a central sanitary sewer system. Specifically, the Policy states that "no properties designated other than as a TOWl1, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development" (within the RLSA) are permitted to connect to a central sanitary sewer system. The Policy also states conditions for conncctions within the Rural Transition Water & Sewer District (i.e., the County's Rural Fringe Mixed Use District). This Policy should be revised to replace "Collier County Utilities" in the third sentence with "Collier County Water-Sewer District". CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697. [Public Comment from March 15, 2010 EAR Public Meetinz - Suggesting the County should study ideas to target GHG sources - beside tramportation, to address a lack of energy efficient plans, to address the need to plan for sea level rise.J [Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment {i'om AUi!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop -- Suggesting that the amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policiesfollowingfrom the adoption of HB 697may be misplaced and consideration .fiJr any such change may serve beller if consolidated to address multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location . and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.} C. Attached Documents Analysis: Figure SS-J.J Collier County Sewer District Boundaries This map has the same title as Figure SS-l and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies, should be deleted Figure SS-1.2 Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas This map has the same title as Figure SS-2 and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies, should be deleted. Figure SS-l Collier County Sewer District Boundaries This map is referenced in multiple Policies and is wrong. The references to this map should be changed to reference "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas" since the District Boundaries are included. Additional changes relating to RFMUD Sending Land.~ boundary adjustments. Figure SS-2 Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT This map is referenced in the same Policies as Figure SS-l and should be updated to the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Figure 1-1 (attached). Recommend similar maps be added for other Sewer Systems overseen by the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority. Figure SS-3 North Sewer Service Area This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and should be deleted. Figure SS-4 South Sewer Service Area This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and should be deleted. Table SS-U Capita/Improvement Projects FY 2003-2007 This table is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is specific to the Collier County Water- Sewer District. For those reasons, this table should be deleted. Look for the "Attached Document Analysis" items above to appear in the Capital Improvement Element as cross references, and revise or delete in manners similarly with above instructions The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008 included the initial step toward re-naming of this Sub-Element from the "Sanitary Sewer" Sub-Element to the "Wastewater Treatment" Sub-Element. The new name should be reflected in all figures and tables within this Sub-Element, changing these designations from "SS" to "WT" or "WW" and in all references to these documents found throughout the Growth Management Plan. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from December 7, 2010 EAR Adovtion Hearinf! - Recognizing staff comments regarding further revisions to certain Figures associated with District boundary adjustments.) 9 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT '" "0 __....__.,_,;.~____,__"".,.. Pages 10-12 Blank Public Facilities Element -- Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Updated jiJr January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing FIGURE SS.l I x o , ~ ill. ~:';';';~U-t ~ o C1 z , gC'''0 " Z Q w " " z ~ o z 't:. , :~(,LDEN GAH, 8L,/CN " 4 ~ ~ " ~ :~ o o '" ! , -PINE RIDGE RU EX, !.o' w o ~~. ~ I c . ~ ; o o o o GOlcOEN GATE PKY . 175 Legend Collier County Sewer District Boundaries Entity FGCU Service Area ,-------1 L_~ North Area _ Northeast Area _ Orange Tree lK~~~1 South Area "".ii1IIIIt Southeast Area 1;81l cdtfter County t' ", _",_,;;,,;."'1,-,; ,"~ iF <':,L!J"':~' i v'," COLLIER COUNTY SEWE~DISTRrCfBC1~f 13 ----------~-----------------I .~. FIGURE SS-' 1 i .i -""-, ~ _~"I , j " " ::1 'C-oL _J'I" ";::61 :{ ~; ;i C\ :J ~U2J~ 8 1; o < o GOl'DEN GATE PKY r~ ~t3:"" Z '> ::; --;:;M~ ,~IUGE fm tXi . co y Na Legend Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas Entity FG(;U Service Area __ -J North Area _ NortheastArea _ Orange Tree ~':f,f~~~;;! South Area _ Southeast Area Ccilller County IjS'_1,' ,/~~ '. .; EXISTING AND FUTURE. SER"lel:~~.. !~ Pa~c ur I " ( ., 'I," :~:'::::J-~: y~,.1 , ." l ~~~-:-;r--~" , \#t I \-) ",.., : "" / '.,-:=.-. j r /" , :-.. '::;~~~:L~cr~"'~"'~J-,'f~'<-' -----1 ',\:~:"\iIl 4 .:', i : --'::,.', J' ..' , ... I ~ .....-........." .J.. - :",...~.>\"...':$~,~---' " I-~~---i--' i --_._-'~ .. . ,.. . <, " ....'. I-I ,,' '. [' _~'l~~_;i :'l" l~'- .. , n j' ftj--.: '_ ". II i " .. II ~ _/...... -~-----! , ---.oy---- , ~ ~-~ -~ .J -"j :~ ..' \ . 1. ",., :') --.'.;---"';;--' ~~-+-_.....-..---,- , "r: - 'r"'-"-+""'4 l'~ .=r. i <"",!-,,~ ," .-, It'.._--:;-.+ '. ~..._ . L.'''...;.i: ,-,...'".,.~- l . ~ I' : _j , .' .....,.~~;::'..~~~," ~-- , . , :~:..-.=-c__~,,,. . : ,. _ ~ ..t . c(..\" I '. ............. ~ .. II " . II . :\?=::'::.7;~~~ ". . COlLIERCOUfoffY- : w;... TElt' "I'm -'SEW~ I ,,,olimlCT_.,- .J '1.,-,":- . " " >- " ," . I f::~, I l-.'~ -- -- - =-i~. ~---- , , , '\' -'\-;. .. - '!...~:; 1,. I: '...;' '. ' .~ '--.,~, '.... ';'>'I'~:,.F ,.""\."(" -,." .":~.': -,--,,- ,c'k-C" :/ ....._;-;-'~ ~,i " ~,"" " '.f't:i:-'-:,-,i);~ _' ',-;l...~'~"~-"'~) ~,.. .... '~:~:~-~t:::'_'~~:.l;~t;.'-;"'r:; ,- .,--(,-:j~' ..~, Yo.'.,"" \,,- !/ .4"'i i~':>--~:;,/: :{;::~..r.-;, i{ ""~.."~~\"~''-~'IS1A~~':~'~''''' -~ JV . ''AND s~,~M'\ "~--r--J, \'.' 1C'f-~~::::;: I ~ - ../ ~\ \ ......llJ'~-", '1.<:r~' ,I \ J "1\' -1 ~\ \._'//; \_'-:'-~~ :!~_'~+.V"" f.~~r" --.c"" ii~ -~"'c.- }-~l'"':,t:, i~"" . <':~'0,:;'- :...~"+ ,;>~", 'i"c '/~: ,: ~", )'!~~-' -/ '.'it. .~~ _.n, .} .:~ "i j I, /..1 COI.J.Jt~ COONlY 'A_VO.l' SftOW!'li w,H",~r IV.N , ."'... "'"",~ ".,,,...'~ ,~.....,."" COLLIER COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ....t...y .ND 11.N..1'oI .... ,,,',,,",'1,,,,,,,, \ 5 hlLO:I /W'W\V .coll icr~ov .flct/mudules/Sho'WDucumcnt.aspx "docu fllenlid= I 2(71) 8/2/2010 j , -"':~~ ,>.., .. .~. ~_~4~''''--.-' : I:' : ",...-,1 , . ~. .. .,.. . . ~.- . .." "", ':, J-~, ':\~.'J' .;:~ "'or '.:\1, , J ::'-~~ :i'~ ",1 "-" ~r- ;,r-.r> --, "'"""' 1l<1l': ",-, -- - -.- -- - 'nw. '...r.: j.no.u """"""I,""""'''.'' -"'''''''''''' -~ ......,.."." ~.-:f_J ~ """""""'''''',:1 ."",,',"'-:>_.' - ._~ '1 _;()t~o&'~"I)L;OI.lUl_:N; ;! '~I,~~~.~~...~, ,", <;...... ;~ .. .' :\ ~- NORTH SERVICE: AREA ",\ --, :.\ '~l"'''''''' '. -1: . ~ . :r .... "'" ".-. .... ~.......... ..... .,-. .... '" ~....... ... ~ . - . ,..... j ~ ,J[....; !: ,,'-' . . _or "'lCPOSEl' ,1JR.l.. '.....GE..\R1'.ol "OU'""OAi{'f,'l""; hup)/\-\- ~v vii .L'( II i It'P.!1 l\. []t'L/m(ldu k~/stlU\\-I)\ h.-'lllllt'fll.asp\ '.\hJcu IllL'lllid= J 2h6lJ ,,; , , . . \\ ;-;(.'urH :,ERVICE ^Rf-" ~.~ ~':'~.';: ' ". ;:. , " EXISTING AND FUTURE 16 .'". ',' '~ . ,.r,....,. .'i-. P:L'_'-' r;' } "-.,. , , ',' ",-"",_U - ....l...v .......0 11""'... ... Xl'08f~ .,OQ1 K/2/21) II) .----,---------- I' ',-- I I -<~ ~ r"'l~ . 1 hr~ ': -:-Hf,~.1.,1"rt"1'f!+t~ . + , {. w :cS:2 1-'~ <j" 0::: ,.x ',--,-1 Ow..:a:; Z ill <( - I I' ", ed i I '" . " . ?", ---T'l ;It, , , .:,~~., !.-., -1-:~ 4-_cL~\.~ "'-:-lJl ~,"'S_ .' . , :It ~"Io . ; 8: .~ ~, ,.'; ~~ ',.. .lll>~~. :"', ~ ...'1' .-, ...,IIl .'.~f · l~~ . : L~'!_~ ~ " .;~___.L~ ..! I'. a. , ----',,~-L- ~:Il' . :;; _ ,< ,,'+~ ;.i ,.- ..,~o- . ~ , ",,;11 u . " , .= - / . II III I! Ih. II III I I!ll : I m !l i'o,' .j l' i' I! . i l 1.1'11 1 " II U ;; II Ii h ! ! ; Iii I ! lill http://\\iww.colliergtlv .n('t/nltH.luJe.../Sh\..I\A' 1)\..)CUnlent.~l."pX '~dD(:unlenlid= 126(,x 17 Pa'2\..' ! "if I z . . Z . % " l . > . ~ . . .. e <c' \..Lt et:: <.( '..u U :> 0:: :.w V) D::::1 I-L.J ~I (..IIi Ii ;-! 0:::1 o zl ;z 3~'.i U,J wl.. ~ ~. &;0...1.>.1,:\ ~'-i:j~ 8~~5: .,~"," z~:)'1! 3 ~!,2~ u::E~>- ,.. 8/:2/2(11) p r r--."----..-..-..-----.. t -:'j .,p \ " J l . . z . 1 " l . > . .' . . . , . ( ", < -.:(1 U Ct. <( LLJ ,/ J,_) / '> I er:f l1J " ,~,I , , "~I iL '_.1.J 5:1 Leli en; I' ,~ .=Ji 0; :/)j -. ~ ~"I- ~~ ~ Ii li II I '0' I !! I, ' j j " Illtli" 1" I i.,!!l!ndlqlli H /j : ~ ~ l ~ 'I i l ~!! 'I 1111 II :11 . ,~.. , z , w t:~~ ~,tw ~3~ ':;:::Ii::; ;.. \.oJ r::: .... Q ., . <- ::;:lZU 8~ii! r};: .J: ,? i8 hlW://\V\\ 1,\ .cul!iL'r!2l)\ .n'-.'llll1odulc,,/ShIJ\vLhlcurnc-nt.a:..;f)x :\.hXUl1ll'lllJd= l":':{){) 7 ,~/ 2CU Ii) Page 1 of 1 TABLEB$.l. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY 2003.2001 PROJECT DESCRIPnONS WASTEWATER AND RECLAIMED WATER Greeley and Hansen LLC ~'2002 FundIType Projoct Protect Name Ducriptlon (A) No. WASTEWATER PROJECTS Exlotlng W..-...., 413 (Orowlh Rei.""') ProJocIa Completion of expans!on of the eldsting NCWFlF 101m 8.5 to 13.5 MOO. Add 2 new 4131G0 13031 NCWRF 5 MGD Expansion darllers, one new8eratlon basil. one new efftuentllt&r. a new chlortle con1actbkJO. & tank, a new blclWef bttg. DlshfectiDn fadlly, Sludge dewatering expansion, sludge thiCkener. odor control ROP rehment & sludge pumpi1g station. 4131GD 73066 Wastewater Master Plan Uodates Annual Update of wastBw8t8r master plan. 4131GD TJQT4 Uvinndnn Road FM PRR 10 VBR FM from Pine RidoB Road to Vanderbilt Road 4131GD 73076 North/South Sewer Interconnections West Interconnect between north and south sewer systemS. 4131GD 73071 NCWRF Flow E.uallza1lon Flow Eaualzallon Tanks at NCWRF. 4131GD 73079 Master Pu StatkJn.lmmokalee Road! CR 951 New Ma8f8r Pumplnn Station at Immokal8e Road/951 4131G0 73065 VBR 16- FM.. C.R. 951-10 Loaan Blvd. Stl.ldv, de.1an and construcllon of new 16" force main from C.R. 951 to Looan 8M1.. 4131GD 73Oe6 C.R. 951 16" FM . Immokalee Rd. to VBR Study, design and construction of new 16" force mai"llrom Immokal&e Rd. to V8/ldefb1t Beach Road. 4131G0 73066 Land Acquistion for Blosolids Facility Prepare ~~ Iong..tlmn ~~~ all8mat!\l'es, detBrmne k:K:a1lon for blOSoIids processWlolac '....-;rohaIe ,andim Iementolan. Study, Design and constructIOn ofa 16-inch force mail from proposed molar pumping 413/GO 73131 Immokalee Road East 16" Force Main statiOn near ImmokaJ&e Road and eRg51 to proP08ed Orange Tree WRF. This force m8i'l to be construCIed 'Mlh Immolallee Road w1denflg 8CheduIed to start In FY'03. 4131GD 73132 Ea&t S8'N8r Interconnect Study, design and construction of Santa Barbara Blvd. force main from Manr PlJ'Tlp Station 313.00 10 Vandel'bll8each Ad. 4131GD 73150 East sewer Interconnect Booster Station Design and construction of boo&ler pumping s1ation tor Santa Balbara BIvd./Logna Blvd. force mail. ......13100 7315t Master Pumo Slatlon-Vanderbllt Beach Rd. & Looan Blvd. Design and construction of new Master Pump Station tor East Sewer Interconnect VGD 73152 Master pl""n Slatlon-VanderbUt Beach Rd. & Uvlntt!::.ton Rd, New Master Pumpng Stauon J/GD 73153 Master pumo Station. Immokalee Rd. East Area "B" MPS to SeNe Northeast Service Area. 4131GO 73154 SCWRF InJoction Wells ~:~~ ilstal second deep iljection wel at the SCWRF to provide addIlional 4131GD 73155 New NEWRF - Acauire Site Purchase 1,(7 ec &Ie at Oranae Tree for slle of WRF and WTP. study, design and constructior'l of a new 2.0 mgd WRF by 2006, an expansion 10 4.0 4131G0 73156 New Northeast Water Reclamation Facility mgd by 2010, and an expansion to 6.0 mgd by 2018 (expendable to 12 mgd) on the Orange Tree property to IeJ)lace the existing Orange Tree plant and serve potentkl! new customers In Northeast Service Area. 4131GO 73157 New SEWRF - Land Acquisition Study Study of poSSible slte$ tor location ol up to 10.5 mgd (mmdf) WAF in Southeast Service Area. 4131GO 73158 Upsize Lakewood FM to 18" Study, design and constructlon of a new :~~~ force main from Master P:Pi'lg Station 3.05 to Mealer Punn Station 3.09 u radlna exlstlna 12" force main. 4131GD 73166 Pumping Station Upgrades upgrades to exts1rlg lift stations and pumping stations as needed to keep pace wtth arow1h. 413IGO 73167 Growth Mana ment Plan Unm.te Update 5anllary Sewer Subeement 10 Growth Managemeflt Plan 413100 73190 VBR 16" FM ~ ISlandWalk Reimbursement 413100 73195 MPS 3.14 NanlAs Heritaos) New Master pumpng Station 4131GD 73925 MPS 1.04 New Master Pumplrv. Station OrannA Blossom at Gocdet1&-Frank Improvements to exlsti'lg 11ft stations and pumpilg stations as needed to keep pace wIIh 4131G0 73945 Pumping Station Improvements growth. Specific 11ft stations idIlntllied for upgrades based on system hydraulic model il current update to master plan. 4131GO 73948 NCWRF Deeo Iniectlon Well Deslan and Instal two deeo injection wells and new DIW pumpm station. 413160 73949 SCWRF EYDAnslon 2001 Expansion of SCWAF to 16 mnrt MMDF. Study, dl!lsigfl and construcllon ol a two-phased expansion of the plant. The initial phase wII be e 5.0-mgd MOF (6.5-rngd MMDF) expansion of the WAF. The second 4131GD 73950 NCWRF 30.6 MMADF Expansion (Phase 1 = 24.1 mgdMMDF) phase wllalSO be 5.0 mgd AADF (6.6 mgd MMDF). TIle trst phase expansion wi! result In a capaclly of 24.1 mgd MMDF and wi be on-line by 2005. TIle s&oood phase expansion will re8ut! In a capacity of 30.6 mgd MMDF and will be on-Ine by 2010. NowW_413 Pro""" 4131GD WW7 Land Acquisition Study for East Central WRF Study of possibl8 sites for location otup to 12.1 mgd(mmdf) WAFi'1 East Central Servk:eArea. 4131G0 WW8 East Central WRF Land AcaulslUon purchase 50 ac sle at i'1 East Central area for site of WRF. 4131GD WW10 Southeast WRF Land AcQuisition Purchase 50 ac site at In Eet Central area for.1te of WRF. .-4j3lGD WW12 East Contral WRF Study, desV'l ar:~.::::m of a n:::io mgd WRF by 200e and an expansion to 8_0mOdbv.2014. bleto12m k'lAreaClDseN~-~irHIWCUlltomel1l. Study, design and CCM'lStruCtIon ol a new 3.0 mgd WRF by 2012 and an expansion to I ,31GO WW13 Southeast WRF 5.0 mgd by 2019 (expandable to 10.5 mgd) i'1 Area D to seNe potential new customers. lOGier untI after 2010.] T....9S-j.-2QII1~WWClP~ P_lol3 W1W200:!1 19 Htp:/ /www.colliergov.net/modules/ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid= 12664 8/2/2010 Page 1 of 1 TAIIL.!.SS-14 mdITypo PfOIocI ProJect Nllme "............ (A) No. 413100 WW15 Service to Gotden Gate City It !he County acquJree the Golden Gate CIty utilllly, = be nculT8d to decommlssiM the plan1 and direct flows to a eountv I . 413100 WW19 Replace Ex. 4- Force Main v.flh 6- Study, de. and conatruclion of a new 6-hc;h force makI from Master PlJrTlping station 145.00 to Aimort-pulIha Road luocn.clno exIsIIna.t." torce main), 413100 2002.1 LIvingston Road FM Upsize. Regional Park to 1.R. Study, ~=~ of upsIze oteld8ti1g 12.1nch force mUl to 2O-1nch force main from I Part to I.R. 413100 2002.2 V8R FM - Logan Blvd. To Goodlett. Study, design and conatructtoo of a new 16.800 24tlch force main from Logan et.'d. To GoodI8ttt-Frank Road. 413100 2002.3 Goodlette Rd FM - VBR to NCWRF Study, design and cooWuction of a new 3O-Inctl force main from Vandelbilt Beach Road to NCWRF Exl"lna W......t.r 414lRenowollR ntlP_ 41-liR,R&E 70027 Clean Water Act Rlsk M Stu Clean Wa18r Act Risk Uanaoement Study for WastewatBt. 41-liR,R&E 70078 Sol. Assessment Software 80_.. GoodIette.frank Roe.d Four L.ani'lg Improvements (Jet Pile FUdge Road to Jet. 4141A,R&E 73028 GoocIlette Ad FM Relocation Vanderbilt Beach Road) Relocate 12,.500 IF of 16- FM and 4,400 LF of 24" FM as part of road widening projed 60134- Creetiog a set of system maps for the we1ef and wastewater departments to be utiltr:ed tor location of all faclItIn. lhe mapa wi! be u1Ililed n emergency sibJItIons and as a 41-liR.R&E 73032 Sewer System Mapping reference for local engneers requesting information on our wast8waler system. Addilionaly, !he maps wi! be utIIl:ed by !he PWED Section In plarri1g for future ellp8t1s1on Of our system to keep up with anticipated growth. 41-liR,R&E 73045 FOOT Joint Prlls Conttnaency fund lor the relOcation of sewer mains from various FOOT prolects. 41-liR,R&E 73054 Cnty eam Sewer Una Relocate RatUesnake Hammoctt Rd. to C8vis BlII'd_, Relocate sewer mains lor road widening orolect. Road DrolBct currentlll scheduled for FY 2006. 414/R,R&E 73060 Port Au Prince SeYer Replace SU5-~= jwas18water COllection system serving 4 streets off of Port-au- Pmce Road pen idantilication of a fundn!;l 8Otlrc8. 4141R,R&E 73065 CCOOT UtIHty Aelocetes Relocation of u1IlItie. as may be needed given accelerated County road constructIOn Sd1edules. 4141R.R&E 73071 Energy Efflciency Enhancements Study and implement electrical upgradeS to Imrpove energy efficiency at the treatment Dlanls ancl Iaroer DumoWla stations. Relocate sewer collection crews and equipment depot to a larger facility to 4141R,R&E 73072 Public Utilities Operations Center accommodate gmwlh. Proceeds from the sal8 of the existing tacillty at 6027 Shirley - Street will be realized and wII halp otIaet.... cosl to relocate to a larger facIIIly. -liR,R&E 73078 Henderson Creek Sewer Improvements To provide sewer service connections to propetties (M&E and 8&1) South of Hendsr$on Creek Ad. 4141A,R&E 73082 Pump/ljft Stetions Rehab Design and bid p4Jmpna station rehablltatlon for wastewater col8cllona department. 41-liR,R&E 73083 Sewer Une Rehab Design and bid tnlnchl8as sewer nthablUtatton lor wastewater coIIectIana dBpartment 414m.R&E 73127 Siuda. S1abllizatlon Manaoement Sludge Management Improvements 41-liR,R&E 73160 Rookerv Bav FM and PS ImDrovements Improvemnets to Rookery Bay wastewater transmission system. 41-liR.R&E 73161 T.ke Packege Plants Oft-Uno (4) ThIS project wi! allow \he County to taKe over service to wastewater customers In the County now served bv Dackaae 'b'ealment plants. 4141R,R&E 73162 City Permanentlnter-connect Forcemaln inter-connect will CItv of Naples 4141R,R&E 73163 BSU Inter-connecl Forcemaln Inter-connect wIIt1 Bonita Sprhos Utilities Provide sewer system 1&1 analyals and field investigation as recommended In the South 414/R,R&E 73164 South County 1&1 Anafysis Coller County Regional WRF Design Report (June 2001). Goe.IIs to reduce wet weather fIow$ to the SCWRF. 414/R,R&E 73165 Asset Manaaement Assistance Provide assistance In man808tnent of the Counlv's uttlltv assals. 4141R.R&E 73168 Odor/Corrosion contrr:H Multi-year Ptogra::.w~atlgate and Implemenl odor and conosion controt improvements thro II1I1e wastewater colection svstem. 4141R,R&E 73301 VBR - Airport Rd. to CR951 eft relocate Relocate exlsttla force main for road construCtIon. 4141R,R&E 73302 CR951 . GGe to immok. Rd. retocate Relocate exismg force mall for road construclion. 41-liR,R&E 73306 RatlJeSH Ad. - Pollv to CR951 relocate Relocate existing Icree main for road construction. 4141R,R&E 73916 South Cn1y Reg WWTP Work Includes replacemaent of Parkson SCl'&8n, Flyghl SF? Feed pumps. If'1stnmentat;1on for motor (lfI8raled valves. 4141A,R&E 73922 Telemetry Add telemeby to 530 of 650 remote 11ft stations and 13 master lit stations over five vears startlna FY02. 414/R,R&E 73943 30- Immokalee Road FM Clean eXistila 30- FM and Ntal permanent ploalna station. The purpose of Ihill protect 18 the updating of the bIWlg system software currently 4141A,R&E 73944 Billing System udlZ9d by the Dept of Revenue lor Water and WW accounts. The current soflwate does not have report wrttng or generation capablltles. AddilionaD;.1he eoftwlue is outdated for the number of customers thai Coller County has and will continue to gUl. 4141R,R&E 73949 SCWRF Emansion 2001 Expansion of SCWRF to 18 mod.. 4141R,R&E 73950 NCRWRF Expand to 30.6 m!Jj MMDF Expansion of NCWRF to 30.6 m MMDF ( Phase 1 '" 24. 1 mgcl MMDF). 414IR R&E TBO 2003 FOOT Joint projects Contingency fund for the relocation Of sewer mains from various FOOT projects. 4141R,R&E TBD Sewer Une Rehab Deslon and bk:l benchlBsa sewer rehablllatlon forwastewater coIecl:ions department 414IR R&E TBD PumpJUft Station Rehab Prepare manhole and 11ft station rehablitatlon annual contract bid documents. 414/R,R&E TBO Odor/Corrosion Control Muti-year program to nveatlgate and inplement odor and COl'TOSioo conlrOl improvements throud\out the wastewater COI&ction awtem. , Relocation 01 utUfti8a as may be needed given accelerated County road construction ClA,R&E TBO CCDOT Utility Relocates schedules. New W......ter 414 ProleCta 4141A,R&E WW14 Decommsslonina of Pelican Bav WAF Study. design and decommlsslOnlna of Pelcan Bav WRF. 41-liR,R&E 2002~ NCWAF Oxidation Ditch Imnrovements Studv, Deslon and Construction of Improvements to NCWAF OxIdation 0IIch T....ss..l....20C2Co1l1l"WW()jP~ P~2"'3 .,..... 20 http://www.colliergov.net/modules/ShowDocument.asp.x ',oocumentid= 1 2663 , , . 8/2/201 0 Page 1 of 1 TABLE SS-14 .k.,~ project projoct Nome -.- No. RECLAIMED WATER PROJECTS Exlolh>a Roclolmod WIlllr 413 Prolocll 413/GD 74020 Back Pressure SusbUning Valves Instal baCk presssure s~:~ at 81 reclei"ned wal8r melBr aSSBlTlbleslO create Dre8&Ure on dem8lld m. 413/GD 74021 Golden Gate Canal Supplemental Water System = design and construction of System to extract surface watertor meeting peak . tion demands. 413/GD 74029 Effluent Mana ent Master Plan UnrlAte l)pdatB effluent malUlnAment nnrtion of coun~Waat8W8fBr master DIan. Design, permit and construcI one ASR lBat wel NUlIIy, then COflStruct up 10 seven ASR 413/GD 74030 ABR Reclaimed Water Wells wel8 for the purpose of hjedi'lg surplus teell.in&d water dumg off peaks and retrlevng same duMg peak demand "'8& foJ sales to reuse customers. AI80 Includes monitor weI8 piping pumps and telemetry. Construct 20" reclaimed WOlf mOl aJong VandBlblll Beach Road from Airport Road to 413/GD 74034 Vandortllh Bch Reclaim WM 20" Village Wale CIrCle to racreue flows to \he NIS nterconnect, 1118 i"ljectlon web and customers ea&tof 1.75. Construct 16" recl81med W8ter main along Radio Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. From 413/GD 74035 Radio RdlSanta Barbara Blvd. 16" Reclamed WM Foxflre to Countryside to Incf88sellows to NIS Interconnect. A possble alternate routs Is along !he FPL easement betw8&n Davis Blvd. & Radio Rd. 413/GD 74036 RodoRd20'RdWM Construct 20" l'8c1amed water mail along RadIO Road from Briarwood to Foxfire as part of NIS Int8rconnec:t. 413/GD 74076 Reclaimed Water Booster Purno Station - North New Booster Pumpna Station. 413/GD 740n NCWRF 24- Reclaimed Water Maln-NCWRF to Vanderbilt Beach ~ New Aecledmed Water TransmissiotlllAa.... 413/GD 74078 NCWRF 24- Reclaimed Water MaIn-Alon:t1 U~ ton Rd. VBR New Reclaimed Water Transmle:ston Ma.... 413160 74125 Supplemental Irrigation Water ::;; design and constnJction of supplemental water taclllies 'lor reclamed water m. 41:l1GO TBD 2002 Growth ManAl1ement Plan UndAte Update nmwth manAnAmAnt plan aubelement 8\leNftve years. 413/GD 74037 MIscellaneous Effluent I rovements Mlscelaneous Effluent Improvements New Reclaimed Weier 413 Pro 4131GD RWl Reclaimed Water Booster PS - North SA Study. design, and construction of booster ps recommended... Water Resource PlaMlna Reoort. AUDUst 2001. _4131GD RW2 Interconnect to South SA - 20- Reclaimed WM Study, de~~ ~~:: reclarned water line recommended... Water Resource P . Rs Au ust2001. I3/GD RW3 Interconnect to North SA - 20" Reclaimed WM Study. de&ign,~::~ of reclamed waler IN recommended n Waler Resource PIann rt, A'.....''''t2001. Exlltlnn Reclaimed Wlter 414 P 4141R,A&E 74015 Misc. Effluent Imorovements Allowance tor annualimprovemants to the rec:lamed water transmission systsm, 4141R,A&E 74019 Cnty Barn Rd Eft line Relocate Rattlesnake Hammockt~~~ Davis ~~~ Relocate rectalmed water mains for mod ect Road eel CUIT80 scheduled tor FY06. 4141R.R&E 74021 Golden Gate Canal mental Water---:-Q.ictem Inlllatlon of plBn 10 abta... supplementallrriaaUOn water from the canal. 4141R,R&E 74023 Petlean Ba" Irm Fire Goodlette-Frank Road Four Lanng Improvements (Jet. Pne Ridge Road to Jet. 414/R,R&E 74028 Goodlette Ad Reclaim WM . Relocate Vand8rtlllt Beach Road) Relocate 4,400 IF of 20" effluent man ItS part of road Mdenng project 60134. 414/A,R&E 74030 Reclaimed Water ASR Study, deslan and constTUctiOn of new reclaimed water ABR wells. 4141R,A&E 74031 Rehab SCWRF Reclaimed Wtr Stg Tank ~r& to reclBrnB::. s\of8ge tank ...cIudes repalr$ to wag cracks, coostruction l8andemanslon . 4141R.R&E 74033 Reclamed Water Teklmetry Add te6emBtryto 31 recl8inedwater user ales and 7 rawwatel well sites. TherB arB 19 shes n North Service Arve, 7 raw water web, and 12 sites In the SoU1tlSefVlce area. 414/A,R&E 74039 Pelican Bav Wells Add two new wels wbh vauk. e6ec1ric:al ilstrumentation and controls. 4141R.R&E 74047 Reclaimed Water Automalk: Read Meters Add automatic read meters 10 existrln -s~-to enhence operation. 414/A,R&E 74075 Eacle Lakes Reclaimed Water Pu~ Station Uparad8s to rectarned Water PS Funds are 10 Kientlfy sources and Implement a supplemental water supply 10 augment 414/R.R&E 74125 Supplemental Irrigation Water reclaimed water used for irrigation. Includes Immokalee Ad Wellfield and AeclaiTled Water Lne. 414/A,R&E 74300 lmmok. Rd. . US41 to 175 eft rEOOcat8 Reclaimed water Pl'ellne rebcatlOn for new road construction. 414/A,R&E 74301 VBR - Airnort Rd. to CR951 eft relocate Reclained wahlr plpeli'le rabcatlon for new road construction. 4141R,R&E 74302 CR951 - GGB 10 Immok. Rd. relocate Reclatnad water plpetWla relocation for new road construction. 4141R.R&E 74303 GGP - Ai~rt to SB8 eft re&ocate Reclamed waler nlnAlJne relocation for new road constructIOn. 414/A,R&E 74307 Misc. Effluent I rovements Misc. EffhJent Improvements 4141R,R&E 74306 Pelican Ba" Reclaimed Water PS Cranes Add Cranes at PelCan Bav Reclaimed PS 21 http://www.colliergov.netlmodules/ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid=] 2662 8/212010 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements (hat provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Goal - revisions to reflect all that supplying potable water entails, and its interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements Objective I - minor revisions and reformatting Policy 1.1 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 1.3 - minor revision to provide additional specificity. Policy 1.5 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 1.6 - minor revision to provide additional specificity. Objective 2 - revision to strengthen this Policy language, be more inclusive and provide the desired clarity; reformatting. Policy 2.1 - minor revisions to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan, correctly reference an outside document, and provide additional specifieity. Policy 2.4 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan. Policy 2.5 - minor revision to recognize document updates. Policy 2.6 - minor revision to update Ordinance reference. 1 POTABLE WATER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Objective 3 - reformatting Policy 3.1 - minor revisions to reconcile certain LOS standards; deleting an unnecessary statement; part of revision affccting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; revision to add Ave Maria facility and LOSS information; consider revision to introduce water pressures and water amounts as new measures of Levels of Service. Policy 3.2 minor revision to abbreviate. Policy 3.3 minor revision to abbreviate. Policy 3.4 - minor revisions to abbreviate, and provide additional specificity; additional statement specifying review procedure; verify accuracy of agency names and identifications. Objective 4 - reformatting. Policy 4.5 - provide specificity if deemed necessary. Policy 4.6 - minor revision to eliminate redundant language in dcscribing term used. Objective 5 - minor revision to provide new departmental reference; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; refomlatting. Potable Water Sub-Element - Attached Documents - Numerous changes, with direction to cross- check GMP locations where similar references to maps & figures are found - Additional changes to Figure PW-I and related Figures to reflect District boundary changes associated with RFMUD Sending Lands boundary adjustments - two main areas; 1 on south side ofImmokalee Road. 2 POTABLE WATER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element A. Introduction & Background: The purpose of the Potable Water Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows: TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE POTABLE WATER FACILITIES AND SERVICES. The intent of the Potable Water Sub-Element is to assure the provision of efficient and economical services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for a potable water supply while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The provision of public faeilities and services for potable water supply, stormwater management, floodplain management and flood protection, and aquifer recharge area protection and watershed management are planned in correlation with future land use projections. This Goal should be expanded to fully capture the County's goals in these areas and ensure collaboration in implementing Objectives and applying Policies. These interdepartmental colaborations should also be recognized, and strengthend if necessary, in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) and Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) of this Growth Management Plan. As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting Objectives and Policies. As part of the EAR-based amendments, Comprehensive Planning staff is recommending specific formatting changes for the Sub-Element. In addition, the Sub-Element contains a number ofreferences to the County's Water & Sewer District. The District's official name is the "Collier County Water-Sewer District," and the Sub-Element text needs to reflect this. B. Objectives Analysis: OBJECTIVE 1: The County will locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting - the minimum Level of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be based upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated annually), the Collier County Water-Sewer Master Plan, and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Section 3.2 of this EAR contains an analysis of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, including the Potable Water Sub-Element, relative to compliance with the South Florida Water 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT Management District s (SFWMD s) Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Additionally, the staff of the Collier County Public Utilities Division has prepared a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. This Work Plan is to be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs at the conclusion of the SFWMD :\' update of the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Along with the Work Plan, County staff will be transmitting related amendments to the Potable Water Sub-Element and the Capital Improvement Element. Both the Work Plan and the Sub-Element are based upon the County:~ adopted Water Master Plan Update. The Master Plan utilizes population projections prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department, approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and accepted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). As part of the EAR-based amendments. Objective 1 should be revised to delete the reference to the County Water Master Plan and the word "annually" thai is in parentheses after the Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. This Objective should be rephrascd to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policy Relevance: There are currently seven (7) policies within this Objective. Policy 1.1: The County shall continue to expand the ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recovery) system as a potential emergency and seasonal potable water source. This Poliey calls for the continuing expansion of thc County's Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR) Program. This Policy remains relcvant and should be rewritlen not to he utility specific, but to mention those jurisdictions, generally, that have an ASR Program to expand. [Public Comment fi'om Februarv 23. 2UlU EAR Public Meetinl! ,- Suggesting that there is a concern over the potential waste of re-use water: asking if re-use water can be treated to a standard sati.\factory as a drinking water source, and; observing that water should not be treated to a standard of which there is not a demand.) Policy 1.3: The County shall continue to identify sufficient quantities of water sources to meet the County's estimated growth-related needs. Potential water sources to meet the County's 2025 water demands include raw water from Hawthorn Zone I Aquifer (Intermediate Aquifer System) and Lower Hawthorn Aquifer (Florida Aquifer System), identified within the County's 2005 Water Master Plan. The County shall use these water sources as well as alternative sources, as permitted by the State, to meet the County's needs. This Policy requires the County to identify sufficient water supply sources to address future needs. This Sub-Element may be affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted into law in 2005, as follows: 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT 163.3191(2)(1): The Evaluation and Appraisal Report must determine whether the local government has been successful in identifying alternative water supply projects, including conservation and reuse, needed to meet projected demand. Also, the Report must identifY the degree to which the local government has implemented its lO-year water supply workplan. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. Reporting the County's success in identifying alternative water sources and the degree to whieh the 10-year workplan has been implemented mayor may not require revision of this Sub-Element to be in compliance with the above Statutory change. This Policy should be revised to delete the second sentence referring to water sources only if allowed by Statute and reword the last sentence to "The County shall seek supply from all permissible sources of raw water cited in the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan to meet the County's needs. " [Public Comment trom Februarv 23, 2010 EAR Public Meetinl.! - Suggesting the County should develop new tools to predict future water availability. ] Policy 1.5: The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District in the development of the Water Master Plan Update, which is the primary planning document for the Collier County Water-Sewer District. This Policy requires the County to identify sufficient water supply sources to address future needs. The Water Master Plan document does not cover all areas and jurisdictions in the County and this reference should be changed. This Policy should be revised to replace "Water Master Plan Update" with "Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan" and to replace "the Collier County Water-Sewer District" with "Collier County ". Policy 1.6: The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to produce Plans for water supply as described within the Water Master Plan Updates that ensure the County's ability to maintain its stated level of Service standard. This Policy calls for continuation of a County program for protecting existing and potential water supply sources. Protection of existing and potential water supply sources is under the jurisdiction of the County's Pollution Control Department. This Policy should be revised to replace "Water Master Plan Updates" with "Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan". [Public Comment trom March 15, 2010 EAR Public Meetinl.! - Questioning the status of and responsibility for monitoring and maintaining our water resources.] OBJECTIVE 2: The County shall implement the following policies to make certain that public and private sector potable water service utilities provide, repair and/or replace potable water supply, treatment and distribution facilities to correct existing deficiencies in their respective service areas as may be required to meet or exceed the Level of Service Standards established in this 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT Plan. In addition, public sector potable water service utilities will be expanded as necessary to provide for future growth, as provided for in the following policies. Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County :\' private water and wastewater utilities are regulated through the Utility & Franchise Regulation Section of the Community Development & Environmental Services (CDES) Operations Department. This agency serves as stafffi)r the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority. The Utility & Franchise Regulation Section is the County entity responsible for monitoring compliance with County regulations by the various private utilities located in Collier County. In addition to managing the operations olthe Department and See/ion, the CDES Operations Director is also the Executive Director for the Water and Wastewater Authority. The Authority is the regulatory entity for the four (4) utilityfranchises operating in Collier County. In regulating the operations of the County :\' private utilities the Authority, which is appointed by the Board of County Commissioners, exercises considerable power. They may set rates, adjust franchise boundaries, set quality of service standards and intervene in disputes between utilities and customers. The publicly owned (as opposed to privately owned) water supply system is operated by Collier County as the Collier County Water District. The District is responsible for developing, operating and maintaining all of the County~' public facilities related to potable water treatment and distribution. This Objective is being achieyed and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objcctive". [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting this language be strengthened to befully inclusive and clear about non-County supplies and suppliers.} Policy Relevance: There are six (6) policies within this Objective. Policy 2.1: The Collier County Water-Sewer District shall continue the development of a Collier County Regional Potable Water System consistent with the Capital Improvement Element and the Collier County Water-Sewer Master Plan to correct existing deficiencies and provide for future growth. This Policy calls for the County to continue developmcnt of a Regional Potable Water Utility System. This Policy should be deleted or rewritten to not be utility specific - - - include both Water - Sewer District and the County Water and Wastewater Authority: replace Master Plan with 10-Year Water Supply Plan. Post-EAC Workshop comment: Reference to: County Water-Sewer Master Plan OK to read as: Counfl' 10- Year Water Supplv Plan. and not Lower West Coast Supply Plan. 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT~ POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT Policy 2.4: Collier County shall permit development of potable water supply systems as follows: within the Designated Urban Areas of the Plan, including the outlying urban areas of Immokalee, Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the Islands; within the areas depicted on the Collier County Water District Boundaries map (Figure PW-1); within the Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas map (Figure PW-2), which includes the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District; in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized; in Towns, Villages, Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay; and, in areas where the County has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this Plan. For lands located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, but in which County water service is not currently available, non-County potable water supply systems shall only be allowed on an interim basis until County service is available. Individual potable water supply wells may be permitted within the areas depicted on the Collier County Water District Boundaries map (Figure PW-1) on an interim basis until County water service is available; individual potable water supply wells may be permitted in all Urban designated areas outside of the areas depicted on Figure PW-1 on an interim basis until a centralized potable water supply system is available; individual potable water supply wells may be permitted in the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, depicted on the Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas map (Figure PW-2), on an interim basis until County water service is available; individual potable water supply wells may be permitted in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized, on an interim basis until County water service is available; and, individual potable water supply wells may be permitted on lands outside of the Urban designated areas, outside of areas depicted on Figure PW-1, and outside of Towns, Villages and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay - all areas where potable water supply systems are not anticipated. However, individual potable water supply wells may or may not be permitted within Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size, depending upon the uses permitted within the Compact Rural Development. Also, in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size, potable water supply wells are allowed to serve no more than 100 acres, on an interim basis only, until central service is available. This Policy remains relevant and allows development of new or expanded potable water systems in certain portions of unincorporated Collier County. It also allows the use of individual water supply wells in areas where County or other central water supply service is unavailable. This Policy should be revised to replace "until County water service is available" with a more inclusive statement, such as, "until a centralized potable water supply system service is available". This includes mapping changes and new map information derivedfrom the private, or smaller, providers or districts. Policy 2.5: The County shall continue enforcement of ordinances requiring connection of existing and new development to central potable water systems when they become available. Connections to a central system shall be made pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 01-73, adopted December 11, 2001. This Policy calls for the County to continue enforcing mandatory connection to a central water supply system, when such is available. This Policy should be revised to add "as amended" to the end of the last sentence. 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT Policy 2.6: Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, water service shall be connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water- Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01- 57, adopted October 23, 2001, or its latest revision, and District construction and operating policies. This Policy requires Community Development Districts, or other Special Districts to connect to County water facilities when such are availablc. This Policy should be revised to replace "Ordinance 01-57, adopted October 23,2001" with "Ordinance 04-31, adopted May 11,2004". OBJECTIVE 3: Pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, Collier County has implemented procedures to ensure that at the time a development order is issued, potable water facility capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum Level of Service Standards established herein is available or will be available to serve the development under the guidelines established for concurrency in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective is the County's potable water concurrency provision. The Collier County Water-Sewer District achieves concurrency of its stated LOS standard. The disclosure of this achievement is reported within the periodic updates of the County's Water Master Plan. This Objective is being achieved and it should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective"'. Add the parenthetical "(LOS)" or "(LOSS)" to allow use of acronyms in subsequent Policies. Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective. Policy 3.1: The following Level of Service Standards are hereby adopted and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development: Review of the historical ratio of residential to non-residential demand indicated that approximately 17% of the total water usage is non-residential. Thus, the residential demand is 154 gpcd and the total finished water demand is 185 gpcd. 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT FACILITY CAPACITY FACILlTYISERVICE AREA LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD 185 gpcd Collier County Water-Sewer District Goodland Water District Marco Island Water District Marco Shores CITY OF NAPLES FACILITIES Unincorporated Service Area EVERGLADES CITY FACILITIES Unincorporated Service Area 185 gpcd 185 gpcd 185gpcd 185 gpcd INDEPENDENT DISTRICTS Orangetree Utilities Immokalee Water and Sewer District Florida Governmental Utilities Authority 100gpcd 100gpcd 100gpcd This Policy remains relevant and lists the Level of Service (LOS) Standards for the various Collier County potable water utilities, both public and private. This Policy should be revised to delete the second paragraph and update the Level of Service Standards, as the Collier County Water-Sewer District is now 170 gpcd. The Policy should be revised to indicate the LOS standard for Ave Maria Water and Wastewater facilities, which are inside the County. The LOSS for wastewater treatment appearing in Policy 3.1 above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5; subscction "D" in the Capital Improvement Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures. This Policy will remain relevant in its reconciled format. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshov - Supporting staff suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the ClE, with this Sub-Element being revised to direct readers to the CIE for this information. The CCPC also suggests considering whether water pressures and water amounts could be introduced as LOS standards. Add Ave Maria facilities to this listing.} Policy 3.2: In order to ensure that the Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 are maintained, methodologies for determining available capacity and demand shall incorporate appropriate peak demand coefficients for each facility and for the type of development proposed. This Policy remains relevant and requires that public and private utility methodologies for determining available capacity and demand must incorporate appropriate peak demand coefficients for each facility and for the type of development proposed. This Policy should be retained essentially as writ/en. This Policy may be revised to abbreviate "Level of Service " to "LOS". 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT Policy 3.3: The Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 are the minImum criteria for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water supply facilities. This Policy remains relevant and states that the LOS Standards contained in Policy 1.3.1 "are the minimum criteria for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water supply facilities." This Policy should be retained as writ/en. This Policy may be revised to abbreviate "Level of Service " to "LOS". Policy 3.4: The County will annually review historical potable water demand records and adjust the Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 if so indicated by the annual review. This Policy remains relevant and requires an annual review of potable water dcmand records, with adjustment of the LOS Standards, as necessary, based upon the findings of the annual review. This Policy should be revised to replace "County" with "Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority.., and add a second sentence, such as the fell/owing: "The Collier County Water-Sewer District shall review historical potable water demand records during Collier County Wastewater Master Plan updates and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 3.1, if needed." and retained as rewrit/en. This Policy may be revised to abbreviate "Level of Service .. to "LOS". [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!ust 27. 20!O EAR Worksho[}- Suggesting that changes ensure the proper identification of the re.\ponsible entities.} OBJECTIVE 4: The County shall continue to promote conservation of potable water supplies by developing and implementing an integrated, comprehensive conservation strategy which will identify specific consumption per capita goals. Obiectivc Achievement Analvsis: This Objective commits the County to the implemcntation of an ongoing water conservation program. This Objective is being achieved and as such, it should be retained, cssentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policy Relevance: There are currently seven (7) policies within this Objective. The Objective and policies are similar to Objectivc 4 and its policies within the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element (refer to the Sanitary Sewer Section of this Report). Policy 4.5: Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, and where such districts make provisions for irrigation via dual systems utilizing effluent and/or other irrigation sources, said systems shall be connected to the regional system when available, and all internal irrigation systems shall remain in private ownership and be master metered by the County. 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT This Policy requires Community Development Districts, or other special infrastructure districts, to connect to the County Utility System when they irrigate using dual systems and are located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Service Area. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. SHOULD THIS POLICY PROVIDE A SPECIFIC ORDINANCE CITE? Policy 4.6: The County shall promote the use of xeriscape techniques (landscaping method that emphasizes water conservation in its use of drought resistant landsGalling plants) to minimize potable water use for landscape irrigation. This Policy remains relevant and requires the County to promote xeriscaping as part of its conservation program with regard to irrigation reduction. This Policy should be retained essentially as written. OBJECTIVE 5: The County shall discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector potable water service suppliers in an effort to maximize the use of existing public facilities through the development order approval process by implementing the following policies. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective seeks to discourage urban sprawl through maximization of existing public water supply utilities. Further, the Objective states that this action will be achieved through the local development review process. The Public Utilities Engineering Department coordinates with the Zoning & Land Development Review Department in the review of development order applications to ensure that the requirements of this Objective are met. This Objective is being achieved and his Objective should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing GHG emissions in furtherance of HB 697. CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshoo - Suggesting that the amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies following from the adoption of HB 697may be misplaced and consideration for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location, and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.] 9 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT C. Attached Documents Analysis: PW-I.I Collier County Water District Boundaries This map has the same title as Figure PW-l and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies, should be deleted PW-1.2 Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas This map has the same title as Figure PW-2 and is wrong. This map, and references to it in Policies, should be deleted Table PW-8 Capital Improvement Projects FY 2003-2022 This table is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is .\pecific to the Collier County Water- Sewer District. For those reasons, this table should be deleted. Figure PW-I Collier County Water District Boundaries This map is referenced in multiple Policies and is wrong. The references to this map should be changed to reference "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas" since the District Boundaries are included Additional changes relating to RFMUD Sending Lands boundary adjustments. Figure PW-2 Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas This map is referenced in the same Policies as Figure PW-l and should also be updated to the 2008 Water Master Plan Figure 1-1 (attached). Recommend similar maps be addedfor other Water Systems overseen by the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority. Figure PW-3 Potable Water Treatment and Transmission Facilities This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and should be deleted Look for the "Attached Document Analysis" items above to appear in the Capital Improvement Element as cross references, and revise or delete in manners similarly with above instructions [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment (i'om December 7, 2010 EAR Adoption Hearinf! _ Recognizing staff comments regarding further revisions to certain Figures associated with District boundary adjustments.) 10 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT Pages 11-14 Blank Public Facilities Element - Potable Water Sub-Element Updated/or January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing \ , , ~ IIi-I i, I \1 '\ ! c < z ~ ~ o z ~ o z \. Z .2 --''''.Q iY\ '(1:: "' w ~ ~ , - f! g o ~ -\ '" PINE RIDGE RD EXT SOLL>EN ("ATE BLVD ';';' . Legend Collier County Water District Boundaries Entity "' City of Naples ~ FGCUServiceArea c=J North Area .. Northeast Area .. Orange Tree ~ South Area ~SoutheastArea Cdrr1er County , - F1GURE PW.' ~,:",I' ;L'",~- '" :~ '~ :~ 175 I;S"I ~r\., ,:;;}~~ ;,f:,.,:i~, " 'r ,: ,:,: ",'~~"''::;; "".i ;'.f,' ;;,". ,~. -"',, "{:"" --~---------_._-"._--~~...._-----~----~_._-- -'i FIGURE PW-2.1 'x: ,I .~ ., - '~J -; ::; I~OLDEN ',"ATE 81",[j 'N City "fNapl..." -;:~i 'I1_,d-: "I' . ]"; Legend Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas Entity FGCU Service Ared [~] North Ama _NortheaSlArea -'Oral1g<lTrce lrLiiJ SuuthArell rMsOlJrheastAred '<'"., Callier County ('4.:t, -'< <-;"~~ "-'~ ';""""."':'.-<' EXISTING AND FUTURE POTABLE WATER SERVtg!,t~~i:.,j ;f.. Page 1 of 1 TABLE PW-8 CAPlTA1.IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY 2003-2022 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS WATER TREATMENT, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION GrHlllyand HansIln u.P ~2002 FundlTypo Pro)oct Pro;.ct "'me .......... (AI No. Exlotl W.....411IGrowth FIe.teen proJects Const~ lnIerc:cnnecllDna...1 ollrUructlon of GoodI8hoFrank and Pine Ridge 1II'ld..., of 411IGD 70040 CltylCounty Interconnect ~er:.ectbn ~~ewood Blvd. And DevIl BIlle!. Project will make prwllllons fOf Ih8Intert:onnect1o of and COUn WIlIer lMdlllhl M'ilhl went of an emelO9llCV. 411160 70052 Manatee Station Pump Upgrade UpsID pumps and upgrade InItrumantallOn and t:onIrol oIltle Wal.r StOl8Qe FaclIly on loIan8t&1 Road IOmll8!'''l'OWth. New 8-MGD RO Explll'l8lon at 12.MGO lime &OftenIng SCRWTP, RO system. ~ tank. 12 new 411/GO 70054 SCRWTP 8 fJJGD RO Planl and 12MGD Expansion 'Mller supplyW8lllland pumps, 2 cIMp Ir1ectIon wells, rew waIM pipe In.., new SCAOA 8)'11t8m. O&M manual6,waterblendlng.lem,~cygeneratol'&lII'Idcl'lernlclllatonlgeayslflm. ROPlantwlbe ~102<>-MGD. 411IGO 70075 NCRWTP 3 Additional Brackish Water Su We" Add thre new R.O._II PhaH 1- DesIgn andconstruc:t. 3li waltIrmaln IIong Immokalee RoIIdtrom CA e6110 OrangettM. 411100 70093 Immokalee Road East 36- WTM Phan 1/sIob8constTuctlldwtththltoadcontlnlctlonPn:ltM:l PhaM 21B deslgnMd COI'lItrucllon of a 36" _ter mai'llJom IrmlOkalN ROIId to the onlIIOSlId NE WTP. 0411/GO 70096 Water Master Plan LJodates Annual Update of W_ MlIIt8f PlIn. 411IGD 70097 SCRWTP 12 MGD AO E .woo Deelgn and conslnJtllan of 12-MGD ~ osmoslI upan8lon at SCRWTP 411/GD 70099 G.-. Me entPlsn to Update ....r aub8l8menl of GlO1Wth Man8gBment Plan IMKYtlYe~. 411/GD 70140 East Cen1r8l WTM Design and constnJdlon 01 Eat C8IraI Wllt8r t/'ansmlIIelon main. .11IGD 70150 Vanderblt Beach Road ParaJlel Water Main Design and clnslruCllon of a pag/l81w.t_tnInllmInlon maln from AIrport Road to CR 951 .11100 70151 CR 951 WTM-Oavis Blvd to Rattlesnake Hammock D8signand consllUCllonof 838" watertransml98lon maln along CR 951!rom DavIs BouI8vardto RsttIlIsnake HBmrnOck Road 4111GD 70152 CR 951 WTM-RatUesnake Hammock to US 41 Design and CCl'IlltJ\Jakln of a 2'" _ter~nmalnalong CR 951 from AatIIlt$nake Hammock Road Itl US 41 .111GO 70153 US 41 WTM- South from CR951 Design and construction of a 16" water main along US 4111'01'TlCR 95110 ltIIarwee Road 411IGD 701M Lend u1s1t1on for NERWTP fCrance Tree p hase1478C ... 7 "" of WTP Bnd WAF. 411/GO 70155 Land AcquIsition for SERWTP Purchase addKIonaJ property ~ 10 BDstIng M8nal88 Road Puqllng St8tkln property lor new WTP. 411/GD 70156 VanderlHh Drive Booster PS D8slgnandCoos.lnJdlonlorVenclarblltDrllle8oosterPS 411/GD 70157 Manatee Road Potable Water ASR Wells D8sIgt\ and constn.K:tIon of expe.nIIonof1he ASR ly$Iem at lhe M8I'lIht8 Ro8d slIa. 411/00 70862 US .1 WM. Manatee to Bo- South Constnlctlon ol_lermaln along US4' from Manatee to Boyne South, 411/GO 70888 Livingston Road Water Main from Pine Ridge Road to ConsInJc:la UI' WM alorlg LMngs10n RoBcIlrom Plntl Rldg4I Road 10 V.-.daIbII Beach Road cor1CUlNl1l Vanderbllt Beach Road wtlhFlo8l1p1t1jecl 411/GO 70891 Uvingston Immokalee-Vanderbilt Con81~ ~?::M along LMngaton Road lrom Vanderbilt Beach Rll8d to lmmokaIae Road concun'8fll: wlthRoad ct. 411/GO 70892 SCRWTP 20MGD Exoanslon WeU Easement St FutlJre well atudy and euementacqlb;l:lon 411100 00000 Remote DIsinfection Booster SlulIy, oesignanllconetructlonoll'8lTlOt8diP'llectionboosterlllat1on8. New Wa. 411 Prolllela 411/GO W5 Vanderbitt Drive Water Booster StatIon DesIgn MId conelrucl new_lar boosterpu~statlon. 411/GD W13 NERWTP Sl~;..,,~~ and construction of new 3.0 mgd WTP (expandebIiIlo 1S mgd) to replace exl&1Ing Orange TrIM and serve nntentlBl newCUlltorn&nlln Areas A and B. 411100 W1. SERWTP Study, deBlQn and construction 01 new 3_0 rngd WTP (ellplU'ldablB 10 15 mgd) 10 SBM! pot8'ltlltltwW cuslomtllS In south am end AraB D. 411/00 W17 Rattlesnake Hammock 8'/12" WTM UODr'sde Dasign and CllI'ISInJcI a 24" WM blI'-n CR 95110 US 41 along RatlIMnake Hammock Rd. 411!GO W29 New Weltfield Stud lor Pr NERWTP Evaluate pot&ntlBI"MllIfleld IocatIon5 and adlhBs ..- 411IGD WOO New Wellfl8ld Stu lorPr d SERWTP EvBlu8le potenIIaI.....1d locations and addnlBB pennItllng UU8& 411/GD W31 Land AcouIsltion lor NERWfP Wetlfleld Purchase pltlpertytor NERWTP -Uflekj loIlowlng Mlrlflld Rudy 411/GO W32 Land Acautsltlon lor SERWTP Wellfield Purchase property lor SERWTP 'N8IlIIeId klllowIng we/IfleId study EJdatlna W.ter412 tR.newaland ReoIacementll 412/R,A&E 700'0 Clean water Act RM Study e~~~~~~lorchlorlne and ArnmOnlastorage acciGBntaI air relea&B ImplIcatlons and aa of ram 10 ITlWIIrnlll rlIIkolaccldM1lalalr""'ue. Goodklne-Frank Road lour \anIng il'npr'oVements (Juct. Pins RIdge Ad. Itl Jet. VandBrbI: Beac:t1 Ad) 412/R,R&E 70028 GoodIette Ad Water Main Ael~~L.Fol24'WMpIus;reIocaIBCIyfCountyI.......connectal Pine RIdge Rd. asparlolltle road projed 80134. Crea1t a set 01 S)'8t8m mapa lor the Water"" Wastewater Oapts. To be ldz8d lor Iocallon 01 II 412/R,R&E 70033 Watsr System MappIng lac:ll~'Rm ~lha mllplwtll be ullllud by the PlIED SBctlonIn plrmnlng lorfUlUrtI upanslDnol ourS tok8Bp~Pwilh . ConIIngBncylundlOfl1llocallonofwatermainslorFDOTprojltC1Satvarloullocatlonl. US4t tou. 412/R,A&E 70045 FOOT Joint project county~;:'I Mlo ~ HarMlock Rd.;AattlMnakB Hemmock Rd. Itl CR 95; and any oIhIIrFDOT sr8QlJltngrBloctJtlons. ReIOC8l8watermllinslorFDOTconatJuctIon. Poorf'&COlOdl'8Wlngl8I'ldun~c:oncIIionI~ 4121R,R&E 70047 Relocate 20"/12" Water Main US 41 contrBCtorl.reqlJlmdaddltlonllWllrKbyaddlllonBlCI"lWB. AddIlIonaIln5pBclorlllrequll'lldlorac:k8lnll crews. The portion ollhe COunty deposit thai was prwicM.Iy rM1Jnded by FOOT will be !1Id8poIllact 10 cOYerlhBadcllllonalwork. Relocate WIlIer mains 'Of FOOT consInJcllon. Poor feCQrd orawlngs and ~1WBn contIilIons MllIyed 412/R,R&E 70048 AeI0cat812" W8f8f Main U$41 cont:raclof & requlnid addlUonaI wonc by aoclllKlnal crews. AddlllonBllnspectOr Is ~Ired lor adclllonal CI9WS. The portion olltle County depoait thalwu previously refunded by FOOT will be redepoailed to cover lheadclllonal wort. 412/R,R&E 70053 County Barn Road Water Main Relocate ~:~~ock Rd..lo o.vkI Blvd., ReIoc&llon 0/ watsrmBIr'lllorCouoty Barn Rd. 'NidBrW'l;. Rd. set sctledulad lor FY 2007. 412/R,R&E 70057 FacilitY Rehabilitation RehebMalllt vanous compon.ms of the NCRWTP, SCRWTP, ~ and /'8ITIOlB Btallon8. 17 http://www.colliergov.neUmodules/Show Document.aspx ?documentid= 12634 8/2/201 0 Page I of I TABLfPW,", FuncVrype p- Project Name -- (A) No. loral~nII. AdlI!lonIIr.Itlere..........-......thlDlItrtbuIIonSpl8mwhnad<<JJlleliAl 412/R,R&E 10058 OistriblJllon System Rehabllltatlon 1IoW1s00l avdable duelolhlllta aflht.....~,......... ThIs P<<l)ld wi COfnlCflhoN dIfIcIInc:tn, as we( as......... rurtlerof otder metM In Iht ~em thai hive become R8Iotate the W.. ~ W.......lrom 1...1dInllII neIgt1borhDod. The pr8Mnt site was ~...temporarylacllyto~.ll1ilIXIIntncrl15~. hCUll'lll'ltttafflsl\tlW3B, 4121R,R&E 70059 Public Utilities Operations Center 'IIIlhllfOVlttl~to60~""""rteldflVllyearl. AdlOOonlly,thllwarehounls ir1compldtiewllt1....IUIW'ldIrlg.4II,Jb...1'Aod. Tl1l&f.atyWl'houYltIeW.....OiBtItllJIk)nFICIIlty. W"'14nnlIIralIonMd Pd:lIcWOlb~ 412/R,R&E 70063 NCWTP Noise Abatement Perlonn.nolIeftJdyc:onlllltlgofnailll......lII......, ~ In ctoM Pl'OldrNlylothepllrll8lle alYMoutGDlll'lltR:linod.. '(12JR,R&E 70065 NCWTP Manatee & Carica Chlorine Gas Conversion ~ tIw IIldIIIng ctIIclftrW lJIIII..... atlht NCRWTP Man.tM AOBd T.. and carlcI TanklIlo Li BIMch. IrnpI'llW~oIGGW.....,byai:lr'05b1cblp.....lottwltldd'lg27wel1llanctapptOXlmatet1 4121R,A&E 70066 Golden Gate Welffield Improvement 3,OOOlF of raw...,.trroIrnIIIIonmlln. AIIa.lCnaMlonld......"wll$cem IOthI 'Z711J1i1ttlg W8IIalnthew.m!hl ~_"'tobe~ hI',..... 412!R,R&E 7001f7 Golden Gate Blvd 10' Waler Main FItlIocaN 10" WUlrrnMlcnGoldlno..BMl. FromUldlrPfOPOMd~. 4121R,R&E 70069 Upgrade NeWT? Emergency Power Disrrfbutlon New~dIItIIluIIonlMd...~=~IIIowUplanlopefltlllrltromIwo8Xl&tt1g em .Iht....-ntwo tor 1-*-\1) I . 4121R,R&E 70071 CCDOTUd Relocate. ... 412/R,R&E 70074 Port Au Prkx:e WaterlSeW8r Improvements RepIec.uIIIIng--dIbtIIIon~~wlhllfllfKtlo~place.lb-8tand.rdWll8t.walel' coIectlon....m MfYlMa.(..... GIf 01 PofI au PrInot FIo8d. 412/R,A&E 70075 NCRWTP Brackish S WalerWells o.lgn 8l'lll ConItruclIon of new........ .... for It1e NCFIWTP 412IR R&E 70070 Auto Meter Read Installation tna1eIItIonof~WCl'NIlIc~Ndlg""'. 4121R,R&E 70078 SpeclaI Assessment Software F\lFMCeoutdUdllOftwan!lot~.- ,_II.. 412lR,R&E 70090 Master PS Fuel Stora AdI:l~fot10dlyl;l'uIt .................pwnpllllllon 4121R,R&E 700lM NCRWTP I rov.monts Ifldcorwtrucllonol p~~lCl>~._,__lIhNCRWTP 412/R,R&E 70095 2003 Fadl Rehabll/tatfon ~varIouIcomponlrltlol"NCRWTP, SCRW'TP,........ and r.mot.e:talions. for..CUltIll'Mnl. ~,........,..............,hOlllrllUtlonSystwnwtlcl,.adlJqt..-tof 4121R,R&E 70090 2003 Distribution System Rehabilitation Iklw I8nol....bIedutloltw..otIMmu....tt-...... 'TNI ~ WI COI'IKlIhoM dMlCilJnclls. as well u ,."..... nuntlIr of oIdermec.r.1n ItII S)'Sl8lTithat nave become 4121R,A&E 70100 NCRWTP ABA Conversion NCRWTP.\SA ConveniIon 412/R,R&E 70124 W.ter r>>strtbutlon Teteme -- IOMldtelemllly~. 4121R,R&E 70127 GrystaI Lake FM Relocation --, 412/R,R&E 70128 CountY Utility Standards ~C&.nyutllystandarda 412JR,R&E 70158 Lower Tamiaml Well IllC8ment Program RIIpIIa Of'IlIwlperyearlor.cru...,.aern rWbIIy. 4121R,R&E 70170 Vulnerabll ......ment Perform.~"""""'IIudyIor"""ray.Mm 412/R,R&E 70202 2003UtiI Standards .,., -.. ...- 412/R,R&E 70300 Immok. Rd.-US41-I75 ReloCate DMlgn and OtJI'lItJuctlonfot~oIll11i1ting ....rmMl orllrnrnokalM road from us 4110 115 412/R,R&E 70301 VBA. AirportlCR951 Relocate DeIlgn and CCdtnJctIon for ~ ol.-..ng..... main on V~ 8Hch AC*d from AIrport Aoed to CR 151 412/R,R&E 70302 CR951 - GGP 10 Immok. Rd. Relocate DMIgn and conell\lCllon tor I'ClklclIIon oIl11li1l1ng Wfder mar. on CR 9511rom Golden Gate Pe.rkway to .-..... 412/R,R&E 70303 GoIdef1 Gate Parkway. Airport Rd. to sea relocate DtraljJl and construction fOf reIocIIeion or aI8tIrIg wCll, mUi on Golden Gate Paoowyfrom Airport Ad to 5antaBaril&raBlYd. 412/R,R&E 70300 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. - PoIlvto CR951 relocate 412/R,R&E 70881 BackFlow I Cross-connecllon lwMI. ThlI..llveyear prq.ct, wIltIlhetUkofh'undI; being NplInclMl In IhefltlJtllmle)'8lU8 01.. Updalelh8 Ba1g S)Stem IOftwue GVlWIlIy utIad by \he Dept. of Rev8nue IOf WIIIiIr IlI'ld WDl...m.r 412/A,R&E 70882 BlUing System 8CCCUItI. TheClXl9t1tsoflwantdounolheWtI'ltporlWllllngor~l'lIllor1cap&b1l"les. AOI:ItlonIIIy,\h8 son-. 18 ouIcIlIt8dtorthtl1Ulflbll'oI Q.IStomerslhllte*cO\nry hat 8/'I[jVl'lll oontlnu8 to am. Hew War t12 p 412/R,R&E WO NCRWTP RD Membrane '" RepIaeemenllVqUlffldlN8l'yllx)'NIS. 412/R,R&E W9 NCRWTP NanofJlter A _men! ~nl~awery...)'MrS. 412/R,A&E WIO SCRWTP Membra~~_~oement --- "" 412/R,R&E 2002.1 As needed COl1sl,!L~.serviC8S '"- ..- 412/R,R&E 2002-2 NCWRTP Sattwater FeaslblMtv Studytodetermlnetudlltyollrad'lgNltw8llll'alDlltlng&nclnewplants 412/R,A&E 2002-3 Auto Ranch Road MSBU Auto Ranch Ao.cI MSBU 412/R,R&E 2002" Asset Managemen1 Perform AaMl Managemn S1uav 412/R,R&E 2OO2-S SCAWTP Ume Softening New Fourth ReaetcH' Study, Md COI'lSInJCIIon of ~fOIA1tIlme softerq fMCtor lor I9IIlWIIIly 412/R,R&E W33 NERWTP AD Membrana Re '" Alplacl ,.e.1I11lQl.*'<1 W8fy lIIx ~ 412JR R&E W34 SERWTP RD Membrane ment "- .. "" 1 . 4111GD", Growth Driven (Funded by Impact Fee) 2. 412/R,A&E", Renewal, Replacement & Enhancement (Funded by VSM F&8) 18 http://www.colliergov.net/modules/ShowDocument.aspx "documentid= 12633 812120 I 0 r-----,-- I I I I i I r- I i. ~ L I I r I. I~ I I- I: t '!!!r- ...... -.- \. , '" , --~'-I--'-'-- --'-R25E---~- \n.., .\ "~I ' \,: ~_I;~,~_. . ...--1.....'''....-.............."......... :,~,-: ( j'- l\ f<_ ~ ", ,; I i :' . , , . .... . ~,~ !, ~j ~CRWTP -." _,' C'l i . . , ,.- j I a:u.ER CClMI'Y GOVDlrMMT I ~ lIANAGEMENT PlAN 1I' 2QQ2 PUlLIC IJ1lUTES B8IENT I POTABALE ....D!lJlIELDEHT I ..jr :i ~,..':'.. ... "}~f';::..~-o;,p..;;..-_' '.' i~ . , " '"2E . I 1~ " .1 I. ,- - ..:/ ' -'.:~". ' <01 ! i-'~"-'-"_. ~ ~ ". "". ,F _<_"'H .! SCRWTpl -_.~-':r--'"~":,.....,.~.. Clrt " OF ':'~- NAPlES--<:'lil'-._::... v, \ l '~~/ r ......, IIIllIo:\'lI'.. -~- -_. '"~- all_ '" r- -- -- . . r _..;;.r;';~$?-" , , ! ~~~..l~~'...~"......i .~, , " ~f &-, CJ SS1 .' L-.;:j :.~J . .- ~,~ -~.~.~.~ ~RV~ , "'..,.:.;.;:.:-:....--;....---..- . . . . . . . 10.......... "f . "-.... . i ., ~", : ""-CCWER:COllNTY : WATER .&.He'SEO : DlSlRtCT BCll.JkDARY" , . . . i . .~. t. .... '~.. ....~.. '"~ -,:,~: "':".<>"~ .....,. -,,<:", ~ ., car. -.,..: '. ,-----"="'..; , .".'- . COLLIER COUNTY WATER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES . I, ,,,,, ~ \ . \ . , , ~~ . ~3 '\~ ;-'~:':~i;'('~~~~~ i ~,~ .:~~~;'t2~~~:'~;J/.;:: " i, .~ :--' t' ),' " x'.J ...,...._~.: ',4 \\.~:~1=~ .~.)~ ......, :/i DTRcT MARCO ISLAND --'" ~,r .le;1'~~::~';',,:~'~ ~ NIl ilI!R.'cr------.~ /~. ~,..:...':~ :,r-~:"" '"" :'.~r'"~'~-' ' ~~"'-- ,";:~'-'" ~::'.__\ ~,,~ ~""-"" ~" /9 , " , ;l 21 E '. '. .:-. "'"T... iC--j':";URE P'N- I ~ ~ ~'" s . ;; " ...... . . ........." ...D H...... _ "'"""""'" , .J , v , 1 I I- i: I I , , / ,I 'I~E~T il POTAa..l1M1D:!Il.IE1BlEJrtT ~ 1_ _L _ _____~_5________ I. i= I L , I , i~ 25 ~ 2" ~ ~ 27 ? -t- ! :=-:GGPE: '-:;'/1--: "'~:",,''''''" .~ ,oo. \',""'!". r-;-..... :-.....1 ~.-. I J. ! '" I .. _,-_J ;, L .~ I 1. ... ~ .-------:.::;...... ~ " , ,~'\l , , i:;._ , , t-H"!"4 r', l.: ,"t".J. _....u~~. I :. ' ._-,--_._..---.~i~.:...:-~'--- NCRWTP~ I t I "-fn"n.T&n.n.1- hi' t . . L_,~ C.~ . l ............ . ..a~ . i . ~i \.~..: , , .~..._, '!" ~ ,'" r PROPOSED RUIVd.. FRItGE-~ / BOONO~ (m) , .._...I......1~.....__.t. I '., . ,J i I ;; I, ./ ;. '!'......... 'J .' f-- I. , f_----...JJI '.--"'t ,.....-...., r' r" 1......1 ! l_J . l' i " ;;r ~...... .! !I 2 "-irJl_~-->~ 2 . . . \ . , '. , \ * , " 1-' J '_ -,I -..".. :~ ,'--r .......:. I I( . ,t... 1, ~-). j~"'~_~ or./ , . - . . .~ . , ' : "l,' , ~, ~ ..~ " . * lA' , -' -I , I-! , ! IDlIMl . ~i ,,' ~ I ' .. ":\;" . 'I ..... " ,.,,"" . .- -.- --- -.- :''I1II.Iil'''' .-- -- - ~-:J '---' -.. --- == ','. - \ , II ,.-~ f..:,~-:r',~-" 1 * IIIll'I.IIlI" 1Ill'A,._ r- 2IJ i .".~.y .... M...... _I' ac","",,,,,,, I j{ v ~ ________ ____L_ _~,___J EXISTING AND FUTURE POTABLE WATER SfRVlCE AREAS ~ 211 ~ SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Public Facilities Element - Drainaee Sub-Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and granunatical changes. To be renamed, including Sub-Element, Goal and throughout Objectives and Policies Goal - revisions to reflect all that storm water management entails, and its interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting. Objective 1 - minor revision to reflect GIS use; reformatting. Objective 2 - reformatting. Policy 2.1 - part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy; verify that "as amended" may be used in this eontext. Objective 3 - reformatting. Policy 3.4 - revision to provide the desired clarity. Objective 4 - reformatting, with consideration of minor revision to provide the emphasis suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). Policy 4.1 - revision to update document reference. Objective 5 - reformatting; verify that "as amended" may be used in this context. 1 DRAINAGE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Objective 6 - reformatting, with eonsideration of revisions to provide additional natural drainage feature protections in certain County projects, introducing new detention features and including filter marshes, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). Policy 6.1 - verify that certain Federal and State standards would apply, with the proper agency protocols, whether or not references are included to them. Policy 6.2 - minor revision to update document cite; revision to coincide with the increased water quality treatment requirement found in the CCME. Policy 6.3 - minor revision to update document cite; consideration of revisions to provide additional natural drainage feature protections, as suggested by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). 2 DRAINAGE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGt"S Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Public Facilities Element - Drainage Sub-Element A. Introduction & Background: The purpose of the Drainage Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows: COLLIER COUNTY SHALL PROVIDE DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. The intent of the Drainage Sub-Element is to assure the provision of drainage and flood protection facilities and services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for stormwater management while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008 included the initial step toward re-naming of this Sub-Element from the "Drainage" Sub-Element to the "Stormwater Management" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all titles, headings and text within this Sub-Element, and in all references to this Sub-Element found throughout the Growth Management Plan. Note that, in one respect, there is overlap in the intended purpose of the Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge areas. However, the emphasis of the Drainage Sub-Element is on surface water protection, whereas the emphasis of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is on groundwater protection. For an evaluation of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element, refer to that Section of this Report. In addition to the overlap of policies within the Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Elements, there is also an overlap between the intended purpose of the Drainage Sub-Element and Goal 2 of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (refer to the CCME Section of this Report), including the Watershed Management Plans discussed under Objective 2.1 of the CCME. EAR-based amendments made to those sections should be reflected in this Sub-Element, as necessary. As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting Objectives and Policies. The provision of public facilities and services for stormwater management, floodplain management and flood protection, potable water supply and, aquifer recharge area protection and watershed management are planned in correlation with future land use projections. This Goal should be expanded to fully capture the County's goals in these areas and ensure collaboration in implementing Objectives and applying Policies. These interdepartmental colaborations should also be recognized, and strengthend if necessary, in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) and Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) of this Growth Management Plan. This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal". 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT B. Objectives Analysis: OBJECTIVE 1: The County shall utilize the Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) process to update the Drainage Atlas Maps and ChannellStructure Inventory components of the adopted Water Management Master Plan to verify the existing watershed basin boundaries within Collier County. The County will also verify the design storm capacity of the drainage facilities within each basin, and determine the costs necessary to maintain the facility capacities to selected design storm standards. This information shall be used to program operational funds in the Annual County Budget and to identify necessary capital projects and basin studies in the Annual Capital Improvement Element Update and Amendment. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires drainage projects to be included in the County's Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), and thus the annual Capital Improvement Element and Schedule of Capital Improvements update. The County has been diligent in adhering to this requirement. Each year the County provides its latest AUIR to the Florida Department of Community Affairs along with its submittal of its latest adopted Capital Improvement Element. All mapping for the storm water management system is now done in the GIS, and "Drainage Atlas Maps" are no longer utilized. This reference should be changed to identify the GIS and update its connection with the AUIR process. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, cssentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". [Public Comment from Januarv 25. 2010 EAR Public Meeting -- Suggesting the County should re- evaluate monitoring and maintenance procedures for nutrient loads/pollution/water quality. ] OBJECTIVE 2: The County shall maintain adopted drainage level of service standards for basins and sub- basins identified in the Water Management Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage level of service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of this Growth Management Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The purpose of this Objectivc and its policies is to maintain and implement the County's adopted drainage LOS standards for its established drainage basins. Implementation provisions are based in the CCME. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -- DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT Policv Relevance: There are two (2) policies within this Objective. Policy 2.1: The following levels of service for drainage are hereby adopted for the purpose of issuing development permits. Upon completion of each associated Watershed Management Plan, the level of service will be modified, if warranted. A. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinance Numbers 74-50, 90-10 and 2001-27, and Land Development Code Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended. B. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing Levels of Service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed Water Management Master Plan as follows: LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS BASIN LEVEL OF SERVICE MAIN GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM Main Golden Gate Canal Basin Cypress Canal Basin Harvey Canal Basin 1-75 Canal Basin Green Canal Basin Airport Road Canal South Basin Corkscrew Canal Basin Orange Tree Canal Basin 951 Canal Central Basin DISTRICT NO.6 SYSTEM Rock Creek Basin C-4 Canal Basin Lely Main Canal Basin Lely Canal Branch Basin Lely Manor Canal Basin Haldeman Creek Basin Winter Park Outlet Basin COCOHATCHEE RIVER SYSTEM Cocohatchee River Basin Pine Ridge Canal Basin Palm River Canal Basin West Branch Cocohatchee River Basin East Branch Cocohatchee River Basin Airport Road Canal North Basin 951 Canal North Basin GORDON RIVER EXTENSION Gordon River Extension Basin Goodlette-Frank Road Ditch Basin HENDERSON CREEK BASIN Henderson Creek Basin D D D D C D D D C D C D D D D D D C D C D D D D D D 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS BASIN LEVEL OF SERVICE FAKA-UNION SYSTEM Faka-Union Canal Basin D Miller Canal Basin D Merritt Canal Basin C Prairie Canal Basin C SOUTHERN COASTAL BASIN US-41 Outfall Swale No.1 Basin D US-41 Outfall Swale No.2 Basin D Seminole Park Outlet Basin C BARRON RIVER SYSTEM Okaloacoochee Slough Basin D Barron River Canal North Basin C Urban Immokalee Basin C MISCELLANEOUS INTERIOR WETLAND SYSTEMS Corkscrew Slough Basin D This Policy lists standards for the various identified drainage basins. The LOSS for stormwater management systems appearing in Policy 2.1 above is one of two locations within this GMP whcre these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5; subsection "C" in the Capital Improvement Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Elcment entries could elaborate on the figures. This Policy will remain rclevant in its reconciled format. [!,lanninrz Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUi!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Supporting staff suggestion to locate Level of'Senice Standards in the ClE. with this Sub-Element being revised to direct readers to the ClE.for this information.j [Planninrz Commission (CCPC! Comment fiom AUf!Ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Questioning whether the use of "as amended" in this context makes this Policy self amending.) OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall maintain and annually update a five-year schedule of capital improvements for water management facilities in conformance with the annual review process described within the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Like other types of capital improvements, drainage projects are included in annual updates to the Five- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, and thus the County's Annual Budget for each fiscal year. This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policv Relevance: 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT There are four policies within this Objective. Policy 3.4: County improvements to, and maintenance of, existing drainage facilities shall be a priority over new construction projects in the urban and estates designated areas (exclusive of Southern Golden Gate Estates). This Policy requires that the County give major emphasis to drainage improvements in the Estates and Urban Areas, as opposed to other portions of the County. This emphasis toward these improvements is considered in the County's Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Planninf!. Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!.ust 27. 2010 EAR WorkshofJ - Suggesting that the language in this Policy is ambiguous and needs revision to provide clarity and avoid an interpretation that the improvement and maintenance of existing facilities Countywide are a priority over new projects in the Estates - as this is not the case. SGGE is no longer open to development, so no facilities have priority there. ] OBJECTIVE 4: The County shall develop and maintain policies and programs to correct existing deficiencies and to provide for future facility needs in accordance with the annual work program referenced in the adopted Water Management Master Plan. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective requires the County maintain its drainage work program to correct deficieneies and provide for future need. Based on the above, this Objective is being aehieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective" such as, Develop and maintain policies and programs to correct existing deficiencies and to provide for future facility needs in accordance with the annual work program referenced in the adopted Water Management Master Plan. [fublic Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf!. - Suggesting that watershed management and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.] [Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!.ust 11, 2010 EAR WorkshofJ - Emphasizing the importance of preparing and following an annual work program.] Policy Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective. Policy 4.1: Water management projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. These projects shall be undertaken in coordination with the Big Cypress BasinlSouth Florida Water Management District 5 Year Plan. This Policy requires water management projects to be undertaken in accordance with the procedures outlined within the Capital Improvements Element, and that such projects be coordinated with the Big 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT Cypress Basin Board and the South Florida Water Management District. (It is worth noting here that, in Collier County the Big Cypress Basin Board, an arm of the South Florida Water Management District, maintains the major drainageways while Collier County maintains the tributary systems.) This Policy remains relevant and should be retained if re-written. Post EAC Workshoo comment: The Big Cypress Basin is not going to publish the 5-year plan in this format (County has been doing this since the early 1980s). Beginning this year the new document will be called Big Cypress Basin Strategic Plan 2010-2015. Properly revise reference to the "Strategic Plan" without the date reference. Policy 4.1 County capital stormwater management projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. These projects shall be undertaken in coordination with the Big Cypress Basin Strategic Plan. [Public Comment fi-om March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetin!!. - Suggesting a number of these 'other regulatory agencies' be identified, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), as those among whom water resource management is coordinated - including surface water. stormwater, and water supplies/or municipal services.} OBJECTIVE 5: The County shall continue to regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended). Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective provides for the protection of natural drainage featurcs and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improvc its formatting as an "objective". [Plannin!!. Commission (CCPC) Comment from Au!!.ust 27, 2010 tAR Worksho/J - Questioning whether the use of "as amended" in this context makes this Objective self amending.] OBJECTIVE 6: The County shall protect the functions of natural drainage features through the application of standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stormwater management systems. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the watershed management planning process identified within Goal 2 and Objective 2.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. This objective is made measurable through the following policies: Obiective Achievement Analvsis: 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT Ibis Objective seeks to protect natural drainage features through the imposition of stormwater discharge quantity and quality standards. The Objective relies on its subject policies for the definition of standards. As per Objectives 2 and 5, this Objective should be revised to reference (in general) the objectives and policies contained in Goal 2 of the CCME, and the Watershed Management Plans described under Objective 2.1 of the CCME, and to acknowledge that these portions of the CCME provide guidance for protecting the functions of the County's natural drainage features. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". [Public Comment from January 25. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting that watershed management planning needs to be about more than just water -- planning should take a more holistic approach.} [Public Comment from March 15, 2010 EAR Public Meetini! - Suggesting that watershed management and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.} [Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from AUf!ust 11, 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that this Objective be expanded to address additional protections of natural drainage features in roadway construction and other transportation projects, for introducing or increasing both wet and dry detention features, andfor includingjilter, or trickle, marshes to the system.) Policv Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective. Policy 6.1: Projects shall be designed and operated so that off-site discharges will meet State water quality standards, as set forth in Chapter 62-302.300, F.A.C., as it existed at the date of project approval. This Policy identifies a specific resource to address storm water discharges to natural drainage features and requires the County to meet State water quality standards. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Environmental Advisory Council (EACi Comment (i'om AUi!ust 11, 2010 EAR Workshov - Questioning whether any applicable Federal water quality standurds may not be incorporated into State standards and would still apply, and if so, include proper reference to them.) Policy 6.2: Collier County's retention and detention requirements shall be the same as those provided in the South Florida Water Management District's Basis of Review, as it existed at the time of project approval. This Policy identifies storm water retention/detention requirements of the appropriate Water Management Distriet, with this document referencc appearing to be out of date. This Policy also mirrors other provisions found in another Public Facilities Element Sub-Element. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. This Policy remains relevant and should be revised to replace "Basis for Review, dated January 2004" with "Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume IV, 2009". 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT ~ DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT It is also noted that the County does not adhere to the same retention and detention requirements as those found in the resource identified. The interim watershed management regulations exceed the SFWMD retention and detention requirements by requiring 150% of SFWMD criteria for all developments. The SFWMD typically only requires that for projects discharging into designated Outstanding Florida Water (OFW) sources. This Policy remains relevant and should accordingly be further revised to reflect the increase in water quality treatment. This Policy conflicts with CCME Objective 2.l.a. which requires 150% of the SFWMD water quality treatment requirement. This is part of the Interim Watershed Standards. [Planninf!: Commission (CCPC! Comment from AUl!ust 27 2010 EAR WorkshOfJ - Suggesting that both the CCME and this Policy properly reflect the 150%(igure.) Policy 6.3: Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. The allowable off-site discharge rates are as follows: a. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfslacre (North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) b. Airport Road South Sub-basin 0.06 cfs/acre (South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) c. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfslacre d. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfslacre e. Harvey Basin 0.055 cfslacre f. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfslacre g. All other areas 0.15 cfslacre The County may exempt projects from these allowable off-site discharge rates if any of the following applies: 1. The project is exempt from allowable off-site discharge limitations pursuant to Section 40E-400.315, FAC. 2. The project is part of an existing SFWMD permit, which allows discharge rates different than those listed above. 3. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off-site at a rate higher than those listed above. The documentation required for this purpose shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes the applicable criteria in the "SFWMD Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications". The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and SFWMD staff. The study shall include the following site-specific information: a. Topography b. Soil types and soil storage volume c. Vegetation types 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT d. Antecedent conditions e. Design rainfall hydrograph f. Depression storage capacity g. Receiving water hydrograph, and h. Other relevant hydrologic and hydraulic data. Using the above information, a hydrologic and hydraulic model shall be developed which demonstrates the higher off-site discharge rate. This Policy commits the County to using the 3-day, 25-year storm event as a discharge rate standard. The Policy also contains a list of calculated discharge rates for identified basins and sub-basins. This Policy references discharge requirements of the appropriate Water Management District, with this document reference appearing to be out of date. This Policy also mirrors other provisions found in another Public Facilities Element Sub-Element. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. This Policy remains relevant and should be revised to replace "Basis for Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications" with "Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume IV, 2009". [Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from AUVlst 11. 2UlU EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the County consider setting new limitations, or maximums jor these exempt projects to provide additional protections of natural drainage features.} CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697. [!,lanninz Commission (CCPCi Comment from Auzust 27. 2UlU EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies following from the adoption of HB 697 may be misplaced and consideration .for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location , and should be removed from the/ as a proposed revision.) 9 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Public Facilities Element - Solid Waste Sub-Elemcnt Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. To be renamed, including Sub-Element, Goal and throughout Objectives and Policies Goal - revision to incorporate guiding principles for solid waste management; reformatting Objective 1 - minor revisions including reformatting Policy 1.1 - minorrevision to add explanatory details Policy 1.2 ~ verify that "as amended" may be used in this context Policy 1.4 - minor revision to add explanatory details Objective 2 - reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies, as amended Policy 2.4 - revisions to remove mandate to complete a date-specific task; consider alternate version for minor revision in reference to specific facility Policy 2.5 - part of revision affecting multiple Elements to eliminate redundancy Policy 2.8 - revision to reduce level of specificity Policy 2.14 - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to maintain effective debris clean-up plans Policy 2.18 - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to study improved waste management techniques Policy 2.24 - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to evaluate viability of recycling agricultural plastic films 1 SOLID WASTE SUMMARY OF RECOMMl!-7VDED CHANGES Policy 2.25 - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to explore feasibility of expanding Immokalee transfer facility to provide additional services Policy 2.28 ~ New recommendation to add a Policy directing the County to assist other groups to establish recycling programs Policy 2.30 New recommendation to add a Policy directing the County to encourage the construction of sustainable buildings Objective 3 - minor revision, including reformatting Policy 3.2 - minor revision to delete a parenthetical statement Policy 3.4 - New recommendation to add a Policy committing the County to encourage sustainable landscaping practices Policy 3.5 - New recommendation to add a Policy ensuring the County meets recent, Statutory recycling rate 2 SOLID WASTE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Public Facilities Element - Solid Waste Sub-Element A. Introduction & Background: The purpose ofthe Solid Waste Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows: PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL BALANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SERVICES THAT WILL ENABLE THE PEOPLE OF COLLIER COUNTY TO MEET THE ESTABLISHED REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN A MANNER TO ASSURE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND TO PROTECT THE AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY. The intent of the Solid Waste Sub-Element is to assure the provision of efficient and economical services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for solid waste collection and disposal while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The provision of public facilities and services for solid waste management is planned in correlation with future land use projections. The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008 included the initial step toward re-naming of this Sub-Element from the "Solid Waste" Sub-Element to the "Solid Waste Disposal" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all titles, headings and text within this Sub-Element, and in all references to this Sub-Element found throughout the Growth Management Plan. The original intent of the Solid Waste Sub-Element was to assure the provision of efficient and economical services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for solid waste management while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, FA.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The Goal should be revised to replace "air, water and land" with "environmental resources" and to add another statement, such as the following: "In all aspects of solid waste management, adhere to the following Enduring Guiding Principles approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners at the Integrated Solid Waste Management Strategy Workshop on December 5, 2006: . Environmental and Growth Management Compliance - Environmental Compliance means managing the impacts to the air, soil, water, and wildlife as well as "quality of life" impacts to the community such as aesthetics, odor, noise, and traffic and Growth Management Compliance means satisfying the growth management requirements reported in the Annual Update and Inventory Reportfor both lined and permitted disposal capacity; . Airspace Preservation - Airspace Preservation means managing solid waste upstream from disposal as a means to extend the remaining airspace (disposal) capacity at the Collier County Landfill; 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT . Operational Excellence - Operational Excellence means optimizing the operations of our assets such as the Collier County Landfill and our Recycling Centers as well as the programs administered by the Public Utilities Division; and . Best Value Service - Best Value Service means that the services offered in the County reflect local and regional conditions and that the value of service is appropriately balanced with the cost of service. A component of Best Value Service is that there is a direct correlation between those that receive the benefits and those that pay for the services. .. This Goal should also be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal". B. Objectives Achievement Analysis: OBJECTIVE 1: (COLLECT/ON) Collier County shall continue to maintain a safe, dependable and efficient solid waste collection system. Present facilities meeting - the current Level of Service include two (2) franchise collection areas and three Recycling Centers, as follows: a. Unincorporated County service area; b. Immokalee service area; c. Three (3) Recycling Centers; 1. Naples Recycling Center 2. Marco Recycling Center 3. Carnestown Recycling Center Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, esscntially as written. This Objective should be revised to add the Immokalee Recycling Center as number jiJUr and replace "three Recycling Centers" with 'four Recycling Centers", and rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective: Policy 1.1: The County shall continue to maintain and regulate commercial, multi-family and tax-bill based residential collection costs to ensure efficient and dependable service affordable to all users. This Policy the County to continue to maintain and regulate collection costs to ensure efficient and dependable service that is affordable to all users. This Policy remains relevant and should be revised to add an entry, such as the following: "The primary components of a solid waste collection assessment are: I. Franchisee Contract 2. Tipping Fees 3. Administrative and Capital Program Costs .. 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT Policy 1.2: The County shall retain its mandatory collection Ordinance Number 2005-54, as amended, and the mandatory commercial recycling Ordinance Number 2004-50, as amended. This Policy calls for the maintenance of the County's mandatory collection ordinance. This policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!Ust 27,2010 EAR Worksholl - Questioning whether the use of "as amended" in this context makes this Policy self amending.] Policy 1.4: The County shall ensure public awareness and participation in solid waste collection issues by addressing such issues in duly noticed public meetings. This Policy requires that all solid waste management issues be addressed at advertised public meetings. This Policy should be revised to read, such as, "The County shall ensure public awareness and participation in solid waste recycling, reuse, waste reduction, household hazardous waste collection and disposal by addressing such issues in duly noticed public meetings and by advertising recycling, reuse, collection, and disposal strategies and tips by such media as local newspapers,jTyers, magnets and TVand radio commercials. " [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the amount of specificity introduced with "and tips by such media as local newspapers, flyers, magnets and TV and radio commercials" is unnecessary in a comprehensive plan document and should be removedfrom the proposed revision.] OBJECTIVE 2: (DISPOSAL) Collier County shall continue to utilize safe and efficient methods for environmentally sound disposal of solid waste in accordance with local, State and Federal regulations and shall continue to investigate improved methods and implement practices that meet this objective. Obiective Achievement Analysis: A review of the policies associated with this Objective reveals that it is primarily concerned with the environmental impact of County landfills. However, it also contains a policy that references the County's Solid Waste Level of Service (LOS). The Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policy Relevance: There are eight (8) policies within this Objective: 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT Policy 2.1: The County shall continue to monitor groundwater as required by the regulatory permit conditions for the operation of the landfill and in compliance with State and Federal rules and regulations. This Policy requires that groundwater wells be monitored. This policy remains relevant and should be revised to add entries. such as the following, at the end: "and pursuant to the Section 2.7 of Landfill Operations Agreement with Waste Management Ine. of Florida. Dedicated ground water monitoring wells are located within the County's landfills and are monitored for potential groundwater contamination in accordance with the State of Florida Permit Conditions. " {Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from Auzust 27.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting thaI the staff proposed change is not necessary.] Policy 2.2: The County shall continue to maintain leachate and gas management systems at County landfills in order to comply with permit conditions. This Policy calls for leachate and gas management systems to be installed at County landfills, as needed. Both County landfills currently have such systems in operation. This Policy remains relevant and should be revised to add a statement. such as IhefiJllowing. at the end: "Pursuant to the Landfill Operation Agreement with Waste Management, Inc. of Florida (WMIF), Section 2.9 Gas Management System, WMIF shall maintain, revise and upgrade the system as needed to comply with permit conditions and Standard Levels of Service for the industry. " {f'lanninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from Auzust 27.2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the staff-proposed change is not necessary} Policy 2.4: By fiscal year 2010, the County shall acquire andlor retain the land inventory required for future solid waste operations, based upon selection of, including but not limited to, one or more of the following options in order of priority: 1. Develop the means to partially or completely divert solid waste from the landfill (additional recycling or alternative forms of disposal). 2. Increase the maximum permiSSible elevation of the Naples Landfill so as to gain additional airspace capacity. 3. Explore emerging conversion technologies that would allow for continued solid waste disposal operations within Collier County. 4. Secure and utilize additional capacity at a landfill or landfills. This Policy requires the County to maintain sutTieient land inventory for future landfills. The County's adopted LOS for landfill capacity (as referenced in the Capital Improvement Element) is "10 years of permittable capacity at average disposal rate/previous five (5) years." This Policy should be revised 10 replace "By fiscal year 2010, the County shall acquire and/or retain the" with a statement, such as, 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT -- SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT "The County shall pursue the acquisition of" and replace "Naples Landfill" with "Collier County Landfill to a maximum elevation of 200 feet above grade ". [Planninr! Commission (CCPC) Comment from Au!.!ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshol! - Suggesting that the amount of specificity introduced with "a maximum elevation of 200 feet above grade" is unnecessary and should be replaced in the proposed revision with "a maximum permissible elevation".} Policy 2.5: The Level of Service for Solid Waste Sub-Element shall be: a. Tons of solid waste per capita per year, used to determine landfill disposal capacity, is based on the average of the last three complete fiscal years actual lined cell tonnage activity. b. Two (2) years of constructed lined landfill cell capacity at the disposal rate calculated per 2.5.a. c. Ten (10) years of permittable landfill capacity at the disposal rate calculated per 2.5.a. The LOSS for solid waste disposal appearing in Policy 2.5 above is one of two locations within this GMP where these standards are shown. The other location is Policy 1.5; subsection "F" in the Capital Improvement Element. This dualism may be a simple matter of unnecessary redundancy, except that the two Policies are not the same. These differences should be reconciled and a single location selected for these LOSS to appear. If it is decided to show the LOSS in both locations, then the ClE could be formatted to provide the LOS Standards, while the Sub-Elemcnt entries could elaborate on the figures. This Policy will remain relevant in its reconciled format. [Plannin!.! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUr!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshoo - Supporting staff suggestion to locate Level of Service Standards in the CIE, with this Sub-Element being revised to direct readers to the CIE for this information.) Policy 2.8: The Collier County Solid Waste Department shall continue to operate and maintain a hazardous waste collection facility. The facility shall operate five (5) days per week and will accept household hazardous wastes. Additionally, the Department shall continue to hold its hazardous waste collection day at least twice per year targeting residential households but also allowing small businesses to participate. This Policy eQmmits the County to holding at least one hazardous waste collection day (amnesty day) per year. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written, with consideration given to the suggestion that there is no need for this level of specificity. New Policies, such as retaininr! six (6) of the twent]'-two (22) oreviouslv sUr!!.!ested, should be added under Obiective 2: Policy 2.14: The County shall maintain an effective emergency storm debris cleanup plan, and identify and establish temporary debris storage and reduction sites. Policy 2.18: 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT The County shall pursue State and Federal grants for, and participate in, feasibility projects for the investigation and development of improved techniques for waste collection, recycling, transfer and solid waste management consistent with the Enduring Guiding Principles. Policy 2.24: The County shall evaluate options to beneficially recycle plastic agricultural film. Policy 2.25: The County shall assess the feasibility of expanding the Immokalee Transfer Station, or developing a new facility to serve the Immokalee area, to become a full service recycling and reuse center equipped with such options as household hazardous waste processing, paint reuse, vegetative and yard waste drop-off, processing and composting, white goods drop-off, e-waste drop-off, furniture and construction & demolition debris (C&D), resale store, etc. Policy 2.28: The County will work with local institutions, schools, government buildings, or cllurches, to initiate programs for solid waste reduction, reuse, and recycling for their communities. Policy 2.30: The County will encourage the construction of Green Buildings (or Sustainable Buildings). Relative to solid waste management, this includes: . Recycled Content: Products with identifiable recycled content, including postindustrial content with a preference for post consumer content. . Salvaged, refurbished, or remanufactured: Includes saving a material from disposal and renovating, repairing, restoring, or generally improving the appearance, pezformance, quality,functionality, or value of a product. . Reusable or recyclable: Select materials that can be easily dismantled and reused or recycled at the end of their useful life. . Recycled or recyclable product packaging: Products enclosed in recycled content or recyclable packaging. . Durable: Materials that are longer lasting or are comparable to conventional products with long life expectancies. [Plannil1f!: Commission (CCPC! Comment from A Ul!:usl 27. 2010 EAR Worhhop - Suggesting that only Policies 2.14. 2.18. 2.24, 2.25, 2.28 and 2.30 are irredundant with existing Policies, and that the others should be removedfi'om the proposed re\'ision.l OBJECTIVE 3: (RECYCLE AND RECOVERY) The Collier County Solid Waste Department shall continue to maintain and update the Integrated Solid Waste Management Strategic Plan as directed by the Board of County Commissioners. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The County's Solid Waste Management Department maintains the County's solid waste disposal activities in accordance with an Integrated Solid Waste Management Strategic Plan that includes Short, Intermediate, and Long Term Measures. The County rccommends that this Objective be modified to reflect the "Integrated Solid Waste Management Strategic Plan," instead of the "Solid Waste Master 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT Plan." Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policy Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective. Policy 3.2: The County shall continue investigation and implementation of cost-saving measures for County disposal operations. The County shall evaluate other measures, including landfill mining, as new technologies and practices emerge. (Currently, a methane gas collection program is in operation.) This Policy requires the County to "continue investigation of cost-saving methods for landfills." The policy remains relevant and should be revised to delete "(Currently, a methane gas collection program is in operation.) " Two Policies, such as the followinz, should be added under Obiective 3: Policy 3.4: The County will encourage xeriscape landscaping (or Sustainable Landscaping) to reduce the generation of yard waste and reduce water consumption. In practice, xeriscaping means simply landscaping with slow-growing, drought tolerant plants to conserve water and reduce yard waste. COULD BE MOVED TO UNDER 3.1, ABOVE. Policy 3.5: The County shall develop and implement innovative programs to reduce, re-use and recycle solid waste to meet the 2020 FDEP 75% Recycling Rate pursuant to FS Chapter 403. 7032. This new policy follows the recent adoption of the referenced Statute. CONSIDER INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT POLICY OR POLICIES FOLLOWING FROM THE 2009 ADOPTION OF HB 697. [Public Comment trom March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinl! - Suggesting the County should study ideas to target GHG sources - beside transportation, to address a lack of energy efficient plans, to address the need to plan for sea level rise.} [Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUl!Ust 27, 2010 EAR Worksho/J - Suggesting that the amount of change introduced with Objectives and Policies following from the adoption of HB 697may be misplaced and consideration for any such change may serve better if consolidated to address multiple Elements or Sub-Elements at another location, and should be removedfrom the/as a proposed revision.} 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT.- SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT The following page is from the Solid Waste portion of the 2010 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), approved by the BCC on November 10, 2010. The chart shows the land fill diversion effort of Collier County Solid Waste, a reduction from 1.23 tons per capita in 2000 to .54 tons per capita in 2009. This Forty-Four percent reduction in per capita disposal rate accomplished by the residential and commercial recycling programs stands as one of the most significant County-wide efforts to promote sustainability and directly relates to the major issue if Climate Change. 8 Public Facilities Element - Solid Waste Sub-Element Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing Collier County Govemment Public Utilities Division 2010 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) Table 1: Collier County Landfill Disposal Capacity Level of Service Standard: Ten Years of Permitted Landfill Capacity at Previous Three Years Average Tons Per Capita Disposal Rate July 15, 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Tons Per Next Ten Years Ten Year Fiscal Peak Capita Annual Tons Total Landfill Landfill Permitted Landfill Year Population Disposal Disposed Capacity Capacity Capacity Surplus Rate Balance (tons) Requirement or Deficiency (tons) (tons) 2000 309,511 1.23 381,499 4,537,914 2,851,746 1,686,168 2001 325,159 1.32 430,511 4,107,403 2,649,128 1,458,275 2002 341,954 1.07 366,547 3,740,856 2,514,700 1,226,156 2003 359,191 0.80 288,409 5,820,359 2,462,714 3,357,645 2004 374,364 0.78 291,903 9,130,976 2,411,619 6,719,357 2005 386,668 0.71 274,777 9,695,124 2,382,460 7,312,664 2006 396,310 0.70 278,384 9,920,278 2,354,944 7,565,333 2007 400,027 0.64 254,889 9,594,647 2,356,287 7,238,360 2008 399,532 0.61 241,816 9,282,412 2,376,181 6,906,231 2009 399,979 0.54 215,338 8,831.381 2,428,149 6,403,233 2010 404,032 0.52 209,172 8,622,209 2,491,663 6,130,547 2011 411,524 0.55 227,893 8,394,316 2,541,610 5,852,706 2012 419,155 055 232,119 8,162,197 2,592,584 5,569,613 2013 426,928 0.55 236,423 7,925,774 2,644,604 5,281,170 2014 434,645 0.55 240,808 7,664,966 2,697,693 4,987,273 2015 443,531 0.55 245,618 7,439,349 2,751,116 4,688,232 2016 453,013 0.55 250,869 7,188,480 2,804,115 4,384,365 2017 462,698 0.55 256,232 6,932,248 2,856,653 4,075,595 2018 472,590 0.55 261,710 6,670,538 2,908,696 . 3,761,642 2019 482,694 0.55 267,305 6,403,233 2,960,207 3,443,026 2020 492,410 0.55 272,686 6,130,547 3,011,482 3,119,064 2021 501,718 0.55 277,641 5,852,706 3,062,831 2,789,875 2022 511,202 0.55 283,093 5,569,613 3,114,240 2,455,373 2023 520,866 0.55 288,444 5,281,170 3,165,696 2,115,473 2024 530,711 0.55 293,896 4,987,273 3,217,185 1,770,088 2025 540,002 0.55 299,041 4,688,232 3,269,103 1,419,129 2026 548,716 0.55 303,867 4,384,365 3,321,859 1,062,506 2027 557,571 0.55 308,770 4,075,595 3,375,467 700,128 2028 566,568 0.55 313,753 3,761,842 3,429,940 331,902 2029 575,712 0.55 318,816 3,443,026 3,485,292 (42,266 2030 585,002 0.55 323,961 3,119,064 N/A N/A 2031 594,443 0.55 329,189 2,789,875 N/A N/A 2032 604,036 0.55 334,502 2,455,373 N/A NtA 2033 613,784 0.55 339,900 2,115,473 N/A N/A 2034 623,689 0.55 345,385 1,770,088 NtA N/A 2035 633,754 0.55 350,959 1,419,129 N/A N/A 2036 643,982 0.55 356,623 1,062,506 N/A N/A 2037 654,374 0.55 362,378 700,128 N/A N/A 2038 664,934 0.55 368,226 331,902 N/A N/A 2039 675,665 0.55 374,168 (42,266 N/A N/A 2010 AUIR - Solid Waste Page SW-2 ,_.<.,.,.~_",_,_,~.._..._."e'_"_~_' m w,._.,,__,~, SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Public Facilities Element - Natural Groundwater Aquifer Rechan!e Sub-Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Sub-Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Sub-Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Goal - revisions to reflect all that aquifer recharge area protection entails, and its interdependence with provisions found in other Elements and Sub-Elements; reformatting Objective 1 - revisions to extend time allowcd to complete a periodic task; reformatting Policy 1.1 - minor revision. Policy 1.2 - consider revision to identifY potable water wellfield locations in the greater Immokalee area. Policy 1.5 - consider revision to identifY department involved with preparing and utilizing the referenced publication; minor revision to update document cite; verify that "as amended" may be used in this context. Objective 2 - reformatting. Policy 2.2 - minor revision to update document cite. Objective 3 - reformatting. Policy 3.3 - eonsider revision to reflect coordinated monitoring efforts, and point out monitoring efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area. 1 NGWAR SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 3.5 - consider revision to point out efforts in the greater Golden Gate Estates area. Objective 4 - reformatting. Policy 4.] - minor revision to reference another section in same document. Objective 5 - revisions, including reformatting; removal of undefined term from further use in this Objective and its subsequent Policies. Policy 5.5 - modifY to reduce extent of specificity. NGWAR Sub-Element - Attached Documents - Numerous changes, with direction to cross-check GMP loeations where similar references to maps & figures are found. 2 NGWAR SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Public Facilities Element -Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element A. Introduction & Background: The purpose of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is defined within its single Goal, which reads as follows: THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS FROM ACTIVITIES THAT COULD DEGRADE AND/OR CONTAMINATE THE QUALITY OF GROUNDWATER. The intent of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is to assure the provision of efficient and economical services that would enable the citizens of Collier County to meet their needs for the protection of groundwater recharge areas while also assuring public health and safety in accordance with the criteria set forth in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The annual update and amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, adopted January 28, 2008 included the initial step toward re-naming of the "Drainage" Sub-Element to the "Stormwater Management" Sub-Element. The new name should be used in all references to that Sub-Element found in this Sub-Element and throughout the Growth Management Plan. Note that, in one respect, there is overlap in the intended purpose of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Drainage Sub-Elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge areas. However, the emphasis of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element is on groundwater protection, whereas the emphasis of the Drainage Sub-Element is on surface water protection. For an evaluation of the Drainage Sub-Element, refer to the Drainage Section of this Report. In addition to the overlap of policies within the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Drainage Sub-Elements, there is also an overlap between the intended purpose of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element and Goal 2 of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (refer to the CCME Section of this Report), including the Watershed Management Plans discussed under Objective 2.1 of the CCME. EAR-based amendments made to those sections should be reflected in this Sub-Element, as necessary. As currently formatted, this Sub-Element consists entirely of a single Goal, and its supporting Objectives and Policies. The provision of public facilities and services for aquifer recharge area protection and watershed management, floodplain management and flood protection, potable water supply, and stormwater management are planned in correlation with future land use projections. This Goal should be expanded to fully capture the County's goals in these areas and ensure colaboration in implementing Objectives and applying Policies. These interdepartmental colaborations should also be recognized, and strengthend if necessary, in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME) and Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) of this Growth Management Plan. This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal". 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT [Public Comment kom March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetini! - Questioning the status of and adherence to the Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan and the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan; another, suggesting that watershed management and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.] B. Objectives Analysis: General Analvsis: The Sub-Element Objectives and Policies are implemented primarily by the Collier County Pollution Control & Prevention Department. The Objectives and Policies speak generically about groundwater protection and the identification and protection of aquifer recharge areas. However, virtually all of the Departments work is related to County potable water wellfields (>100,000 GPD design) in accordance with Land Development Code Section 3.06.00 .. Groundwater Protection. OBJECTIVE 1 (MAPPING AND DELINEATION OF RECHARGE AREAS): The County shall continue to review every two years, and revise as necessary, existing map delineations of County potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to contamination from nearby land development and other surface activities. The biennial review and any subsequent map revisions will be based on geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, and updated anthropogenic contaminant data aggregated since the previous revision. Obiective Achievement Analysis: Currently, Collier County~' Pollution Control and Prevention Department uses an advanced 3- dimensional computer model to calculate Wellfield Risk Management Zones around significantly sized existing and planned potable water wellfields (>100,000 GPD design). These Wellfield Risk Management Zones. in the form of maps, are adopted into the County s Land Development Code 3. 06. 00 Groundwater Protection and placed on the County:~ Zoning Maps for County planners to use when regulating land development with the intent of protecting potable water wellfieldsfrom pollution sources. This Objective should be revised to replace "review evelY two years" with "review every tltree years" and "The biennial review" with "Tlte tltree year review". The proposed amendments .for Objective I provides adequate time (3 years) for the development of the proposed Wellfield Risk Management Zones. adoption of the proposed Wellfield Risk Management Zones into Collier County S Growth Management Plan~' Future Land Use Element (Maps), and adoption of the proposed Wellfield Risk Management Zones into Collier County~. Land Development Code, Section 3. 06 "Ground Water Protection." The two years that are presently allotted have been .found to be insufficient to complete this objective. The recommended language amendment will provide sufficient time (3 years) to complete this objective Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as rewritten. This Objective should be rephrased to improvc its formatting as an "objective". 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT [public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinl! - Questioning the status of and responsibility for monitoring and maintaining our water resources.] Policv Relevance: There are five (5) policies within this Objective. Policy 1.1: The County shall revise and update its 3-dimensional computer models of ground water flow around public water supply wellfields, as additional data (e.g., withdrawal rates, numbers and locations of wells within wellfields, and hydrogeologic information) become available. This Policy requires that groundwater flow around wellfield modeling be revised, as pertinent data is made available. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. There is one recommended change. The term "ground water" should be replaced by "groundwater" in this Policy, and throughout the remainder of this Sub-Element and entire GMP wherever informally used [not in title of formal document). This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as revised. Policy 1.2: The County shall identify those County potable water wellfields, or portions of wellfields, which are susceptible to contamination, caused by adjacent or nearby land uses, drainage patterns, geomorphic conditions, soil properties, andlor hydrogeologic factors, including the presence or absence of confining units. This information shall be revised and updated as necessary. This Policy requires that the identification of wellfields susceptible to contamination be revised, as pertinent updates are made available. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. There are no recommended changes. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from AUl!ust 11. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that potable water wellfield identification include locations in the greater lmmokalee area.] Policy 1.3: The County shall maintain and update data on existing land uses and land use activities that possess the greatest potential for ground water contamination. This Policy requires the County to monitor land uses and land use activities to gauge their potential to contaminate groundwater. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. There are no recommended changes. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Public Comment from March 15, 2010 EAR Public Meetinl! - Questioning the status of and responsibility for monitoring and maintaining our water resources.] Policy 1.5: This Sub-Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the Surficial and Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and Hawthorne Aquifers, as described in the South Florida Water Management District's official publications dated April, 2000 (and scheduled to be published in 2006). 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT This Policy requires the County to reference a South Florida Water Management District publication to keep current its computer model. A general reference to a 2006 publication however, potentially limits the County's ability to keep this data current in future years as subsequent editions are published. The Pollution Control Department implemenlS this Policy. The "official publications" incorporated by reference are the District's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plans. A version was first published in 2000 in three parts: a Planning Document, a Support Document and the Appendices Document. There was an update in the 2005-2006 timeframe - also published in multiple parts. There is an update ongoing that may be completed in the 2010-2011 timeframe. This Policy remains otherwise relevant and should be retained and revised to identifY the specific SFWMD publica/ion or publications being incorporated by reference into this Sub-Element, such as, This Sub-Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the Surficial and Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and Hawthorne Aquifers, as described in the South Florida Water Management District's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan, as amended. [Environmental Advisorv Council (t,'AC) Comment kom AUf!.us/ll. 2010 EAR Workshop - Questioning whether the County department involved with preparing and utilizing this publication should be identified by this Policy) [Planninf!. Commission (CCPC) Commenl from A Uf!ust 27. 201 () EAR Workshov - Questioning whether the use of "as amended" in this context would make this Policy self amending.) OBJECTIVE 2 (PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY): Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards. Obiective Achievcment Analvsis: This Objective seeks to protect natural groundwater aquifer recharge features through the imposition of quantity and quality standards. Collier County has implemented numerous proactive programs designed to protect Collier County:s groundwater quality fi'om man-made pollution sources and hence remain compliant with this Objective. In addition, Collier County has also developed programs designed to respond to pollution releases into the environment and to monitor their sati.lfactory cleanup. Finally, the Collier County Pollution Conlrol & Prevention Department has developed strong working relationships with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Collier County Environmental Health and Engineering Department, South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin Board and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services that enhance the County:s ability to effectively coordinate et!i)rts to meet this Ohjective. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective" such as, Protect natural aquifer recharge areas to ensure the highest water quality practical toward meeting applicable Federal and State water quality standards for ground water, or, Protect groundwater -1 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT from pollutant discharges that may cause exceedance of applicable Federal and State water quality standards; followed by a "policy", such as: Policy 2.0.1: The County shall protect groundwater from pollutant discharges that might cause exceedance of applicable Federal and State water quality standards. {Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetinl! - Suggesting a number of these 'other regulatory agencies' be identified, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and the Us. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), as those among whom water resource management is coordinated - including surface water, stormwater, and water supplies for municipal services.] Policy Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective. Policy 2.2: Non-agricultural developments requiring an Environmental Resources Permit from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall preserve groundwater recharge characteristics as required by the SFWMD and as set forth in the SFWMD's Basis for Review, dated January 2004 and as regularly updated. Ground water recharge shall also be protected through the application of the retentionldetention requirements and allowable off-site discharge rates for non-agricultural developments specified in Policies 6.2 and 6.3 in the Drainage Sub-Element. This Policy identifies groundwater protection requirements of the appropriate Water Management District, with this document reference appearing to be out of date. This Policy also refers to other provisions found in another Public Facilities Element Sub-Element. The Pollution Control Department implements this Policy. This Policy should be revised to replace "Basis for Review, dated January 2004" with "Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume IV, 2009 ". OBJECTIVE 3 (GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING): The County shall continue to collect and evaluate ground water quality data, identifying ambient water quality values and trends, comparing analyzed concentrations to Florida Ground Water Guidance Concentrations, and providing information to water resources planning and management entities, and to the general public. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires Collier County to collect and analyze groundwater quality data for comparison to State Standards, and to be able to provide information on analysis results to all interested parties. Presently Collier County s Pollution Control and Prevention Department samples a trend network of groundwater monitoring wells semi-annually, and reports on the data annually. In addition, a Golden Gate Groundwater Baseline Monitoring Report had been completed in 2004, which assessed the groundwater quality data obtained from 84 residential potable water wells. Residents were provided groundwater laboratory results for the well they owned. A follow-up Golden Gate 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT Estates study is presenlly underway, which will compare this most recent groundwater quality data with the historical 2004 reported data to determine water quality trends. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as wrilten. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". [Public Comment from March 15, 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that watershed management and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.] Policv Relevance: There are five (5) policies within this Objective. Policy 3.3: The County will annually assess its groundwater quality monitoring data to determine whether monitoring activities and County Ordinances require expansion, modification or reduction. This Policy requires the County to regularly re-assess its groundwater quality monitoring efforts. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment (i'om Au!!:ust 11, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting the County coordinate with SFWMD staff to monitor our water resourcesfor salt water intrusion and tracking salinity trends.] [Environmental Advisory Council (n'ACi Comment from Au!!:ust 11, 2010 EAR Workshop _ Emphasizing the importance of ongoing monitoring efforts .for both quality and availability in the greater Golden Gate Estates area. Anecdotal evidence showing that the shallower wells run dry in the dry-weather seasons of/he year should no/ be overlooked.} Policy 3.5: Collier County shall continue to conduct water resource planning with appropriate County, City of Naples, and SFWMD staff to provide for ground water resource development, utilization, and conservation. This Policy requires the County to coordinate their water resource planning efforts with other agencies. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. [Public Comment from March 15. 2010 EAR Public Meetin!!: - Suggesting a number of these 'other regulatory agencies' be identified, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). and the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), as those among whom water resource management is coordinated.. including surface wate/; stormwater. and water supplies jiJr municipal senices.j [Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from Au!!:ust 11. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that water resource planning efforts include the greater Golden Gate Estates area, and take into consideration public health factors.] 6 PUBLIC F:4ClLITlES ELEMENT.. NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT OBJECTIVE: 4 (PUBLIC EDUCATION WITH REGARD TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION ISSUES): The County shall continue current activities of providing the public with educational materials concerning ground water protection issues in Collier County. These may include, but shall not be limited to, the preparation of annual technical publications of ground water quality data, an informational website for groundwater quality issues, general information publications, establishment of a speakers' bureau, K-12 classroom presentations, and in-service teacher workshops and seminars. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective requires continuation of County public educational activities with regard to groundwater protection issues. The Pollution Control & Prevention Department maintains a website that identifies all of the programs designed to protect the County:~ groundwater from pollution. The team prepares and distributes an Annual Newsletter designed to educate businesses on the proper method of managing the hazardous wastes they generate. Team members have also spoken before various groups/organizations about what Pollution Control does and the team remains available to answer any questions the public, regulatmy community. and/or policy makers may have. Based on the above, this Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". Policv Relevance: There are two (2) policies within this Objective. Policy 4.1 : The County shall continue to advise the public on the appropriate disposal methods for hazardous wastes, for the purpose of reducing or avoiding the potential for groundwater contamination. In performing this task, the County may utilize the public educational measures listed within Objective 4 of this Sub-Element, or any other measures which may be appropriate. This Policy requires the development of a public awareness program relative to hazardous waste disposal issues. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. The reference to "Objective 4" should be revised to correspond to the reformatting of said Objective, as applicable. 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT- NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 5 (PROTECTION OF CRITICAL RECHARGE AREAS AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES): The County shall implement plans to preserve critical ground water recharge areas and ground water resources, and will review, evaluate, and revise (if warranted) those plans and actions, based on the best available geologic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and anthropogenic contaminant data. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective shares portions of its stated intent with Objectives I, 2 and 3 above. This Objective focuses the County's responsibilities on "critical" recharge areas and resources, whereas the above Objectives identify all rccharge areas and resources related to groundwater protection. Protecting water quality and minimizing flood hazards employ watcrshed-based approaches that balance environmental, economic and engineering considerations to meet these standards. This Objective is being achieved and should be retained, essentially as written. This Objective should be revised to replace "implement" with "continue implementing" and rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". [Public Comment (i-om March 15.2010 EAR Public Meetinl!- Suggesting that watershed management and water resource management should take a more holistic approach.} [PlanninJ! Commission (CCpn Comment from AUl!ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the use of the term "critical" has no clear definition and should be removed from this Objective and where found in its subsequent Policies.l [Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from November 3. 2010 EAR Adootion HearinJ!- Concurring with the CCPC suggestion to remove the term "critical ".from these entries.) Policy Relevance: Thcre are five (5) policics within this Objective. Policy 5.5: Collier County shall continue to operate and maintain a hazardous waste collection facility. The facility shall operate five (5) days per week and will accept household and small business hazardous wastes. Additionally, the County shall continue to hold its hazardous waste collection day at least twice per year targeting residential households but also allowing small businesses to participate. This Policy requires the County to continue operating its hazardous waste collection facility. This Policy remains relevant, but provides a level of specificity regarding days and hours of operation that is not necessary in a comprehensive planning document. This Policy remains relevant nonetheless and should be retained if rewritten to provide a lesser amount of speciticity appropriate for the GMP. 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT ~- Pages 10 and 11 Blank Public Facilities Element -- Drainage Sub-Element Updatedfor January 201/ BCC Adoption Hearing ~ '-< o ~ '-' 0" ,--.-~"._~ ! i ~--T---- I Q) 0> .... ro .... ..c ro ~; ~ Co ~ Co 'o::::.Q);-Q) >- <D >- "";-L()::- ~("),(o :J~(")L() IJ'V~^ <:t: I I - I -i~ 011 I :J (j) I i L o +-' Q) 0> .... .... ro Q) .c '+- U'- L Q):::::l ....IJ' ....<( Q)- ro.ro ~.U ..-- "0 't c :::::l Q..:::::lCl) ro 0 Q) ~(3.c - T-- 1-- Ol :J <{ , ~\ \,~--y",1 J )~~ jJ5)t' (UJr~ I;' '.0_-< ~ y. " L"" /< rf: "- (~"<'~ J~ (~" ) I \ \ '-- I "L; .~ .~A:'~ /5, ',\ '" '~ '~-1 y '7 iI' ;",,/j"-''\'\. irdh"j':~ I l ,7' II, ( -\,~I ~"', ' , ..~_,~.'(_,,) ,r';:"..)~ " .~,,;c.j I ,,/' I .j~ ~' -)=!"{i \ <:' ,\ )_ r'-/ l ~"-J--".J:~ -I \ \ ' '.,' ,/ '-y! _'\ ':;" "'\,_..?-_' ~, .J ; I '\ {'~"^'- \-~~~"":;:". <::;_J5 \ l)-/'~"'~ '- \- 1~----7~'~ ./ - ____ G ~ \ -J \ !/~~~v -~-~~~:r~, , I / 1'\"- Y ,:",J "~I ......,\.:'l &' " i ..)',;'-' 1/ z::::-fu/-[-=~f:-~' -- " \, \ : '. ,I IY ,.,~J ,).,\, '. _, {~,,_', ,,< _; i /.'...., ,~..... ,.', ""j A'" \ ;> I _ .' ,r " i ,,~~ L-~"'- 'y~-1~l ~I ---,-< ~~~;;'~F~ \~-~ G _ \ ~-o:r------L--'x: --, ~ I ----- l "'....... v y' I j- "--";="'f I ~ (' - ';;_ /, ,", \'_ ~ -'-e~_~j'---] . I .I.V"I"'-'" i" I 1,,1o". . .-.1 I ~ _, i . _ I .,,,,,., '. I \ =0- /' <r-~/ "l')U,-')..J! " l ' '''L / A~ II :y;::,i__J--_:~'i/i=~_.L[;:t . )Jl ,,-'v' .,e"" 'I I i ".::)1,-, I - 1,/ r--: N (") '1t c .9 m .S! :0 :J 0.. o :2' ~ LL CfJ " Q) u ~ :J o CfJ ~ o - 'DC? ~ I 0) cu(J)(J) 0..0) N ~I;:: o..a::~ II~ il __n_ ' (/) il -~~77,--~ il CO .:::::: ,I if :1 o _ L ]2 II I I J I I I I -j o ~ o N ~ N ~ ~ '" \D N ~ /I :s ~ e '-' 8 e u o u ". '" 0. co oj " '-' 8 :J u o Q " o ~ CIl ~ co '-' ~ e u o ~ '-' e >- o ~ " " " " :::::: B< ~ ~ ~ '-< o ~ '" ~ 0.. :~I T~-----T---T-l i 0) 0) I.- C1J .c u '- 0) '- ro 0::: '- ro (!) '- L- ro (!) >- ro .......0) (!) >- -. (!) ~ >--. = >- -' - '<"'" O";-~N;- <(1'--'<"'",'<"'" .- I N Eor--.::!^ C1J E C1J I-- :'\~r1~l! '\.J it), /~, ~'I\.'" ! ~---/ ~ ')r!.~1 .~;y --r''''u:,+~~> '1j, )(/!, 'f~_~ 'c, e ;J~ r~ iJ,--1 "'-. !; \i "'~I L.e( o ':Sf I' '" i;',,, ,. ~ r '\'J' ~ ....,~. I, '-~. -"---~ o i' )l-----0~ /" \>-".l~. , ._~..-J k___,--,,(, """"'-",._ / . . \ Ir-,,-y -~ ,_"...;,;."Y_,-1, ..0 'I . ~J \:-.,..r'~.. \ f\ .,1, ' . >-.__~>,~~-:'J t ::J" I./7'../{ J' '\ ,..~..;---\;.! /'''pn \ n.. L-"'-', 1,- . "'-.r-'-' . '''''' ~. ' o -;f'~--"~' \ \' .J" "~".\ !~C\i~ """..'",- ' 'c/'( 2 !. ~ i '~,,)~ \. r~j'--"7'<'~"~ '\~~~.~ . i,<=_~ '~::::;~~~'.\ ) '\ '. !r-..-"-! ,-- -~ -~~~::r----~ I " S:' ~\ ( 't ~ '---~7~, .~-~-- ~ i)~./'+11 I ?c?r, '7;~\~--J/ ~:~:'~~~0~ " . t I )"1..-/'-" \. .-yr7 \."--r'..,_.r.:::-"':-,:_. '\ . \ 1 ~_~__. _>J1 / t r-'~'" .., --'--'-<-'->--:"1:; '''-_c~. \' J Q) r !.__ ~.! ~ c.----';-'~ J~-'" ; ::::"-1<-<"'\\ ,.'0 , ~ ./ '-, ;~~.y.~/ Y ( j\.T /~,). --1,_'"' \ '. ". ::J !-.-.r 'I' \~, \ K ',I ,,--> - ,,' ~--. " . i: -\, ~'" \.r ---'x-~ , '-x?--'" '._".. ....,.., o ,', '____\ . '<.~ '-, ~. ( \ i---------.~~,\, ~._'" " \ U) 'D'--';~-{' ~:- ."-,",~ 1./ i I~-^~': ~-:L.:~ r:"" -.-J <.t I,' '\ \~,>F.,l_-r: l !'-~<-.. r~l '-~:':-:~ \-:,y (' '\ "[1-, \ j;' "[C"\/'i,!c;:fJ:~'J)'C-j~/ -t;i:::==~:;/'-'-c..U ;~,,;c...-yl /. ,~._J- ~ T \y~ ?\":~ ~,~,_ '1 '"",, ; '\ -, - ;:t-t ;' , )' ,/ "'I, 'W J'---__~ I'" \ iJL ' 1..~~7.-' -." ~-<, ( ..JI,r,'~' o:._.....! ..i'>..,,' ~._..-.-'.._~L-D tr-:: ~ I ::,_~L~~:{ _..;,~;':..~/ \ ! (~;:. ~~ _ _ "t,-,-,-,,--",~,jZ/ "~';'-" /F~~(, r >:j 'c- \:~ -~;} '.J,' /~"t :::-~~-N:;~ ~ --~- -L' -71f-~;'~~ --l / .., r' /\ r'-.----4L ) j-':""" ,k-_ J~' ..-' I' _-r- '. --V.l.. ,'/'~' 1r, ,~ I) i d '^-. H r- c I .~,..",,~:' " 7 __L-.J _.A ~' 1 ,--!Ll----'=L---- --------. lIT --1"---....._--' I ~-.--rOI.t.... I H I LJ j Ff-../,::,r"~,_ro(~{l I ',.,-! y_____ :' ~~._..{'\/-_~ ,\.-' I ~~J)r.-_.:::t:"--=-':'~TfTTTTTTlill!l!IJ~llli \~-1~ i r ',,,...... --' IlLL8W." ill II \, -' . r\ ~>I '1-1'~" ,. ;~"- \ j_-=-i,-;-',,!jtll,LilliE J,,,,'~' ,\;:f .l --:?:.- ,[~:-!.L~JKr~'" ii.,! 1_ !lfl'-~ i, II .! WL>-.l,-~~l-~~~ 'ft:tt1 i.! ill. , iT [II ;11 ,;1:"11: ::'i: !!li1i1il!! (? J ::;:i,',;~~3~E8~:4~~' II ; il ~~"---~).If ----, -- I J, -,' ~ ;;/'~ '", ,)- I -{-,s~I- I =-2 /1 '. ~ -I-~~, / r;~:::--1''''r-_~'~.,/ /.~~-,. . J -, i...) l' \-.!'-- " i if): - - -\:-!'.~~~ --__". ..... -v ,,':'C'"~'~~-? / -- V I (".c.. Il ,c- l ,-~~f--~-/--=----:':::.::.._' '';:b:. ('( ( /.f ' ,~_,__t[. '"'-r ,,\:;,,' ,\: ~:.f.;;:~::.\_,-(~J>:-~;C::A.'T'-"","7"r'- ,,.;:::,'-t.~t:.- \\'~: __ +:. .':x~:t I __' (V t "":Y-'- ,-:.'-;:,;;~ . :,... __'.:""_~"'-" ../ '\ ~'~".rJ~-~' ='oIT'd"~ "->, .. Q .1",' .?~, '" ';:0, rl ~.J ~0 ~f~- E m E '- m 21- m '- 5: Q) "'05: C 0 :::l-.J 2 Q) <.9:5 __._....l______.' /. L- 0) :s: o .....J Iii ' . ~ l. o .....:::l Q) 01<( '- m ~ () Q) '- N 0.. co ~ ------, I.() 0> m ~ OJ ::J <( ~I ~ L- a ...... '0'" <J.) , O'l ro(J)~ Q.(J)f::::!- <J.) I ..- I.- 0...0::"- o ..- " ii _~... -~~~_ ~i, .~- .----.--.,...-..~ '-1, t{) """" - -- -- ~- ':::::" " I' o ~_____L .L_~__l.____...___L~ 13 o ..... o N ~ N - 00 '"' 7 'D N ..... II ~ ~ " o.l E ;::l <.) o '0 ",. "" 0.. en oj ....; " o.l E ;::l <.) o o :s o ..c: VJ - en o.l ..... ;::l '0 o E ~ o.l " ;> o '0 c3 o :s= :s :s ::::: B< ~ ..c: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Housing Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below. Goal: General statement that defines what the Element will ultimately achieve. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describcs actions that will help achieve the goal(s). Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s). Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Objective 1: Revise to reflect a new annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate. Policy 1.1: Revise to reflect that the County presently has affordable-housing interlocal agreements with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island; and, add a requirement that the municipalities shall re-evaluate their respective interlocal agreements with the County every thrce years. Policy 1.4 Revise to make consistent with Section 163.3177(f) I.g., Florida Statutes. Objective 2: Modify to reflect the removal of the HDC reference and their stated mission; add the phrase "for- profit and not- for-profit providers of affordable-workforce housing" before the phrase, "shall assist Collier County..."; and, delete the references to "fifteen" percent and "1,000" units and replace with a new annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate. Policy 2.1: Revise to remove agency reference, as it is no longer relevant. Policy 2.9: Revise to reflect new timeline for task completion 1 HOUSING ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 2.10: Policy 2.11: Policy 3.5: Policy 3.7: Objective 4: Policy 4.3: Policy 5.4: Policy 5.6: Policy 5.7: Objective 6: Objective 7: Objective 8: Policy 8.1: Policy 8.2: Policy 8.3: Policy 8.6: Objective 9: Policy 9.1: Policy 9.2: Revise to reflect departmental name change and Program addition Revise to replace a specific departmental reference with a general reference Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task Revise to remove reference to City of Naples conducting survey Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task Revise to include a date for completion of the Policy task Revise date to coincide with the amended survey commission date to be established in Policy 5.6. Revise to delete the term, "group care facilities" and replace with the term, "group housing and Continuing Care Retirement Centers" Revise to delete the term, "Urban Coastal Fringe" and replace with the term, "Coastal High Hazard Area" ModifY the Objcctive to remove the restriction that rehabilitated units must be located only in the lmmokalce Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area. Modify to remove reference to "non-conforming" residences to correlate with the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element Delete, as Policy objcctivc has been completed Modify to reflect completion of survey and provide a reference that activities are ongoing Revise to remove second sentence of Policy Staff recommends creating a new Objective based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption ofHB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies 2 HOUSING ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 9.3 Policy 9.4: Policy 9.5: Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption ofHB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies Staff recommends creating a new Policy based on the 2009 adoption of HB 697, Green House Gas Reduction strategies 3 HOUSING ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of Successes and Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Housing Element A. Introduction and Background The purpose of the Housing Element is to provide guidance to the County in developing appropriate policies and programs which demonstrate the County's commitment to meet any identified and projected deficits in the supply of housing. Further. the stated Goal of the Housing Element is to provide an adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing for all residents of Collier County. In order to accomplish this goal, the County has implemented strategies aimed at the development of new residential units and the rehabilitation or demolition of substandard units. During the planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), the County has successfully administered various State and Federal programs, including but not limited to, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds, HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) entitlement funds, Emergency Shelter Grant funds, State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) funds, and funds authorized by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 _ all of which funded numerous development and redevelopmcnt activities. The range of funded activities includes, but is not limited to, a single family unit rehabilitation program, multi-family affordable rental unit development, park and infrastructurc development, redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes, and homebuycr education programs. In total, during this planning period, the County has assisted individuals and families with down payment and closing costs in the amount of $1] ,571 ,965; funded residential rehabilitation projects in the amount of$3, I 08,884; and, assisted in the development of affordable-workforce housing projects by defcrring impact fees in the amount of $9,723,672.68. The County has been successful in reducing the number of substandard housing units, preserving historical and archeological resources. stabilizing neighborhoods by rehabilitating residential units, and encouraging development of: or commitments to develop, affordable-workforce housing within the County, through the establishment and funding of programs, and adoption of policies and regulations, aimed at achieving the County's housing objectives. However, notwithstanding these successes, the County's objective of creating 1,000 new affordable-workforce housing units each year during the evaluation period for this EAR has not been achieved. The County has approved approximately 4,214 affordable-workforce units to be built, but only 728 of those units have been constructed. Recent cost-burdened household data, from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies (July 2010), indicate that in 2010 approximately 35.942 residents are cost burdened, spending greater than thirty percent of their household income on housing related expenses, and by 2030 that number is expected to grow to 52,737 households. The data in Table]. further indicate that over a 20- year period the average annual demand for affordable units will be approximately 840 units. This figure reveals an approximate 160 unit per ycar decrease in the affordable housing demand over the previous figure of 1,000 units recommended in the 2004 EAR. 1 Housing Element Table 1. Years Average Annual Increase in Cost Burdened Households 2010 - 2015 2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025 2025 - 2030 881 Units/Year 856 Units/Year Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010 The above data suggest that the County can reduce the annual production rate of affordable-workforce housing units. Further supporting this position is an estimated 3,486 affordable-workforce units approved, but not built, and the current availability of unrestricted affordable housing supply in the market as a result ofthe economic downturn across the State. The recent decline in the housing market has increased affordability; however, it's important to note that these units are unrestricted (not subject to regulatory control of rental or sale price, occupant income level, time period to remain affordable, etc.), and are likely to increase in value as market conditions change over time. This in turn would reduce the affordable-workforce housing supply in the County. Regarding the approved, but not yet built units, it is unknown how many of those units will be built and when they would become available. The Housing Element should continue to include a specific requirement for the provision of affordable housing to ensure that its goal, to provide an adequate supply of safe, decent and affordable housing for all residents of Collier County, is achieved. Continuing to secure "restricted" affordable-workforce housing units will reduce the long-tcrm demand and increase the affordable-workforce housing supply in the County. B. Objective Analysis OBJECTIVE 1: The number of new affordable-workforce housing units shall increase by at least fifteen percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than 1,000 units per year averaged over a five-year period in an effort to continue meeting the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low and moderate incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This objective has not been met. During years 2005-2009, the review period for this EAR, there have been approximately 4,214 affordable-workforce units approved to be built and approximately 728 units built in Collier County. Estimates from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies indicate that the increase in cost burdened households does not reach or exceed 1,000 units per year. The following is a summary of the projected increases in cost burdened households in Collier County through year 2030. 2 Housing Element Average Annual Increase Years In Cost-Burdened Households 2010 - 2015 732 units/year 2015-2020 881 units/year 2020 - 2025 890 units/year 2025 - 2030 856 units/year - . Source: Umverslty ofFlonda Shlmberg Center for Housmg StudIes, July 2010 As reflected above, the average annual increase in cost burdened households is not expected to exceed 890 units per year; the projections reveal a 160 unit per year need less than the current 1,000 unit requirement. This suggests that the Housing Element should be amended to reduce the minimum annual unit production of affordable-workforce housing. Further analyses of the above data show an annual avcragc over 20 a year period to be 840 units. A newly revised minimum unit per year production of at least 10 percent of all units approved, but not less than 850 units per year built, may be more appropriate based on the available data. The Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect an annual yearly affordable-workforce unit production rate of at least ten percent of all units approved, but not less than 850 units constructed pcr year. Planninf! Commission (CCPC! Comment (i'om AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop -- Suggesting to reduce the proposed afJordable-workforce housing unit productionfigure of 850 units to 500 units to account for the future supply of affiJrdable-workforce units approved, but not yet built, and the existing affordable-workforce housing supply. resulting from declining home prices caused by the economic downturn. StaffCommenl Post December 7. 201 Ii Planninz Commission (CCPC) Adof}/ion Hearinf! - Suggesting that staff work with the Departmenl of Community Affairs to determine the appropriate number of affordable-workforce housing units to be constructed annually to meet demand within the County. [The BCC directed stafJto include the market rate inventory with the EAR support data on 12/l4/l0.) Policv Relevance: Policy 1.1: Collier County shall pursue interlocal agreements with the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and Everglades City to require that each city provide their proportionate share of affordable-workforce housing units (or the financial equivalent). Each city's proportionate share and financial equivalent will be evaluated and substantiated by the most current data, studies, and methods available to the County. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The County has existing interlocal agreements with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island. These agreements identify the municipalities' affordable-workforce housing obligations, based on current data, such as population and other methods available to the County. 3 Housing Element Through the interlocal agreement between the County and the City of Naples, the City receives CDBG funds and participates in the SHIP program, returning its allocated 7 percent to the County to administer a joint affordable housing program. Through the interlocal agreement between the County and the City of Marco Island, the City provides $50,000 dollars annually or 10 percent of the building permit revenues, whichever is greater, to the County to administer affordable housing programs. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect that the County presently has affordable-housing interlocal agreements with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island; and, add a requirement that the municipalities shall re-evaluate their respective interlocal agreements with the County every three years. Policy 1.4: Collier County shall seek to distribute affordable-workforce housing equitably throughout the county where adequate infrastructure and services are available. Programs and strategies to encourage affordable-workforce housing development may include, but are not limited to, density by right within the Immokalee Urban area and other density bonus provisions, impact fee deferrals, expedited permitting (fast tracking), public-private partnerships, providing technical assistance and intergovernmental coordination. Policy Achievement Analvsis: The equitable distribution of affordable-workforce housing throughout the county has been problematic and the location of the various affordable-workforce housing projects has been generally driven by market forces. The success of this Policy may continue to be based on market forces until affordable-housing incentives are adopted to encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing in targeted areas of the County. Further, the County currently offers expedited permitting, flexible density and technical support to encourage and promote affordable-workforce development within the County. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. Public Comment (Communitv Meetini! on 1/25/10 and 2/23/10): Public stated that the County does not do enough to provide housing opportunities in close proximity to employment centers, and thresholds should be established to minimize saturation of affordable housing in a single geography. Plannini! Commission (CCPC) Comment (rom AUi!ust 25. 2010 EAR Worksho/J - Suggesting the removal of the phrase, "seek to distribute affordable-workforce housing equitably throughout the county" and, insertion of text within the Policy that is consistent with Section l63.3l77(j) l.g., Florida Statutes, which states, "...avoid the concentration of affordable housing units only in ,pecific areas of the jurisdiction. ., Plannini! Commission (CCPC) Comment from December 7. 2010 - Suggesting that staff work with Habitat for Humanity representatives to revise Policy text, consistent with Florida Statutes. [Habitat representative voiced concern about proposed CCPC Policy change at the Hearing.] 4 Housing Element OBJECTIVE 2: The Collier County Board of County Commissioners aided in the establishment of the Collier County Housing Development Corporation in 2003. The mission of the Housing Development Corporation is to serve as a non-profit agency, with an executive board made up of representatives from business, government, housing advocates, and the community at large, which along with other not for profit agencies shall assist Collier County and its municipalities in achieving a goal of increasing the number of affordable-workforce housing units by at least fifteen percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than 1,000 units per year averaged over a five-year period for very-low, low and moderate income residents of Collier County. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The mission of the Housing Dcvelopment Corporation of Southwest Florida (tka The Collier County Housing Development Corporation) has shifted its focus to foreclosure prevention and homebuyer education. The Housing Development Corporation (HDC) is no longer an active participant in vertical construction. The Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be modified to reflect the removal of thc HDC rcference and their stated mission; add the phrase "for- profit and not- for-profit providers of affordable-workforce housing" before the phrase, "shall assist Collier County... "; and, deletc the references to "jjfteen" percent and" I ,000" units and replace with "ten" percent and "850" units, consistent with the changes proposed in Objective I. Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from Au~'Ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting to insert the affordable-workforce housing production figure of 500 units. consistent with changes proposed in Objective I. Policv Relevance: Policy 2.1: Not for profit agencies, such as the Collier County Housing Development Corporation shall assist the County in reaching its annual affordable-workforce housing goal by holding workshops and fairs to raise awareness and understanding of housing issues in the County; working together to purchase and develop parcels; and, contributing funds towards the purchase of land for affordable-workforce housing projects. Policy Achievement Analysis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to relect the removal of the HDC rcference, as their focus has changed to foreclosure prevention and home buyer education. Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf!s held on 1/25/10. 2/23/10 and 3/15/10): Public stated that impact fee waivers are neededfor a.ffordable housing projects, and others stated that impact fees should be eliminated all together fiJr affordable housing projects. Policy 2.9: The County shall review the County's Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance every two years or sooner, as necessary, and revise the Ordinance, as necessary, to reflect changing community needs and market conditions. The purpose of the Affordable-workforce 5 Housing Element Housing Density Bonus Ordinance shall be to encourage the blending of affordable-workforce housing density bonus units into market rate developments as well as to support developments exclusively providing affordable-workforce housing. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Ordinance is currently under review by the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and is expected to be completed by December 2010. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect a new review time line of 3 years rather than 2 years, to make consistent with Section 420.9076 (4) F.S. Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf!: held on 3/15/10): Public stated that density bonus incentives for affordable housing development within mixed use projects should be provided. Policy 2.10: The Collier County Operations Support and Housing Department shall continue to operate affordable-workforce housing programs, in cooperation with public and private sponsors, to provide safe, affordable-workforce housing to residents of the County's urban designated areas and rural areas. Programs operated by the Department will continue to include, but are not limited to: . Impact fee deferrals . Housing rehabilitation and emergency repairs . Down payment and closing cost assistance Policv Achievement Analvsis: The housing programs are working as intended. During the evaluation period for this EAR, the County has funded approximately $9,723,672.68 in impact fee deferrals; $3,108,883.69 in housing and rehabilitation and emergency repairs; and $11,571,964.51 in down payment and closing costs for income qualified persons/families. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect a departmental name change - "Housing and Human Services Department"; and add to the listing of programs operated by the Housing Department, "Acquisition and rehabilitation program." Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf!: held on 1/25/10): Public stated that the County should provide land for affordable housing. Policy 2.11: The Collier County Operations Support and Housing Department will continue to coordinate with local utility providers to ensure that the necessary infrastructure and facilities for new housing developments are in place, consistent with the County's Concurrency Management System. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Housing Department does not currently coordinate with local utility providers. 6 Housing Element This Policy remains relevant and should be retained in some form. The Policy should be revised to reflect the removal of the "Collier County Operations Support and Housing Department" and in its place insert the following, "The County in coordination with for-profit and not-for-profit providers of affordable-workforce housing development..." Public Comment (Community Meetin<z held on 3/15/10) Public stated that public transportation should be provided proximate to affordable housing. OBJECTIVE 3: Collier County shall continue to support and adequately fund housing programs to promote the preservation and protection of existing, stable residential neighborhoods. This will be accomplished through the utilization of State Housing Incentives Partnership (SHIP) and CDBG programs including, but not limited to, down payment/closing cost assistance, rehabilitation and emergency repair, demolition with new construction, and impact fee deferrals. [This Objective is provided.for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: . Policy 3.5: The City of Naples will initiate a study of the Old Naples area to determine architectural and development standards to protect and preserve the existing residential character of the area. Policv Achievement Analvsis: A study has not yet been conducted. However, the City remains interested in incentives to preserve and protect the existing residential character of the Old Naples area. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include a date when the study must be completed so that the Policy is measurable. . Policy 3.7: The City of Naples will implement their housing maintenance code to address the conservation of housing stock and the preservation and protection of residential neighborhoods. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The City considered a Housing Maintcnancc Code, but one has not yet been adopted. The City does however include Neighborhood Action Plans for all recognizcd neighborhoods within the City as an elcment of its Comprehensive Plan. Specific needs and desires of each neighborhood are established, addressed and evaluated in those Plans. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be reviscd to include a date when the study must be completed so that the Policy is measurable. OBJECTIVE 4: Collier County and the City of Naples will conduct a comprehensive housing survey, every three years or sooner, for the purpose of identifying substandard dwelling units. Through continued enforcement of County housing codes, and the provision of housing rehabilitation 7 Housing Element or replacement programs, the number of substandard units (associated with a lack of plumbing andlor kitchen facilities) throughout the County shall be reduced by 5% per year through rehabilitation or demolition. Obieetive Achievement Analysis: [County] A comprehensive housing survey has been completed in certain areas of the County. The surveying of other geographies will occur in the future as funding and staff resources become available. The County, however, will continue its enforcement activities to reduce the number of substandard units within the county. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: [City of Naples] A comprehensiye City-wide survey of Naples has not been completed. Generally, substandard housing units are identified by the City's Building and Code Enforcement Divisions. The City's Building and Code Enforcement Diyisions do not conduct annual surveys of housing conditions to identity substandard units; such assessments occur only as a result of a natural disaster. Further, there have been no units rehabbed, demolished or replaced by the City through rehabilitation or replacement programs during this review period for this EAR. However, many units were rehabilitated by property owners following hurricane Wilma in October of 2005. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to remove the reference to the City of Naples conducting a survey, as the City does not have this activity programmed or funded in their work plan. Policy Relevance: Policy 4.3: Review and amend the existing relocation policy of the City of Naples and the County, and create one uniform relocation housing policy, consistent with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requirements. Policy Achievement Analysis: A uniform relocation housing policy has not yet been created for the County and the City of Naples. Until such a policy is adopted, both the County and City of Naples will continue to abide by the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Act. This policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be updated to include a completion date for the joint County and City uniform relocation housing policy, so that the Policy is measurable. OBJECTIVE 5: Collier County and the City of Naples will annually monitor all identified historically significant homes to determine if these structures are being conserved, maintained, andlor rehabilitated. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] 8 Housing Element Policy Releyance: Policy 5.4: By 2008, Collier County and the City of Naples will study potential incentives to encourage the conservation, maintenance and rehabilitation of historic homes and will make recommendations to the City Council and to the Board of County Commissioners as to which incentives should be adopted. Policy Achievement Analvsis: This Poliey objective has not been achieved. The Board of County Commissioners and the City Council have not yet adopted incentivcs to encourage the conservation, maintenance and rehabilitation of historic homes. However, in December, 2005, City Council and the City's Planning Advisory Board convened a joint meeting for the purpose of discussing a proposed historic preservation ordinance. Thereafter, planning staff was directed to prepare a reviscd draft ordinance that includes stronger incentives for the preservation of historic homes. The ordinance has not been adopted; however, the City remains interested in incentives to preserve historic structures. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be amended to reflect a revised completion date for the joint study between the County and the City of Naples by year 2011. Policy 5.6: By 2008, the Board of County Commissioners shall commission a new Historical Survey for all of unincorporated Collier County. The Survey shall review the current status of all previously identified historical structures and sites within the unincorporated County and shall make recommendations as to which of these sites or structures should be nominated to the National Register. The Survey shall also review and make similar recommendations regarding any previously unidentified historic structures or sites. Policv Achievcment Analysis: This Policy objective has not been achieved due to an inability to fund the Survey. The County continues to rely on the Historical and Archeological Probability Map Series, updated in 1999, to determine if a project is within an area of probability. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the survey commission date should be modified to reflect a future date when funding potentially would be available to the conduct the survey. Policy 5.7: By 2009, the HistoricallArchaeological Preservation Ordinance shall be updated to include the results of the Historical Survey and to include any relevant changes in State or Federal regulations concerning historical properties. 9 Housing Element Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy objective has not been achieved. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the date of the required revisions to the Ordinance should be modified to coincide with the amended survey commission date established for Policy 5.6. OBJECTIVE 6: Collier County shall monitor changes to state and federal regulations pertaining to group care facilities, and, as necessary, amend its Land Development Code to ensure compliance. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The County will continue monitoring all related state and federal regulations as an ongoing activity. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from the Auzust 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting to replace the term "group care facilities" with "group housing and Continuing Care Retirement Centers" to broaden the purpose of the Objective. OBJECTIVE 7: Although mobile home parks currently exist within Collier County, as a result of the coastal community's susceptibility to flooding and storm surges, any new mobile home parks will be restricted to areas outside ofthe Urban Coastal Fringe. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The County currently prohibits new mobile home parks within the Urban Coastal Fringe. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from the Auzust 25. 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting to replace incorrect reference to the Urban Coastal Fringe with the correct reference to the "Coastal High Hazard Area. " OBJECTIVE 8: Collier County shall continue to utilize SHIP, CDBG, or other funding sources and, in partnership with Federal, State and non-profit housing agencies, will seek to provide a minimum of 50 rehabilitated or new residential units per year for very low, low and moderate income residents of the Immokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area. Families benefiting from such housing will include, but not be limited to, farmworkers and other populations with special housing needs. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The County continues to exceed the minimum number of rehabilitation projects required by this Objective. During the latter years of the evaluation period for this EAR, the County assisted with the rehabilitation of 92 residential properties, and funded rehabilitation projects in the amount of $3,108,883.69 during the entire review period for this EAR. Additionally, the County was allocated $7,306,755 to assist with the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes and residential properties. As of June 2009, 35 percent of those funds have been committed for the acquisition and 10 Housing Element rehabilitation of foreclosed properties. Further, the County was awarded funding under the Disaster Recovery Initiative grant which has funded rehabilitation projects throughout the County. It should be noted that the process for awarding funds to rehabilitate residential units must be competitive, not restricted to certain geographies within the County. As a result, the County recommends revising the Objective to remove the restriction that rehabilitated units must be located only in the Immokalee Urban Area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area. Policy Relevance: Policy 8.1: Collier County shall continue to pursue the policy of requiring all non-conforming or sub- standard residences of any type within the Immokalee Urban Area to be either rehabilitated to current housing code standards or demolished. Policy Achievement Analysis: Collier County transmitted the revised Immokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP) Element to the Department of Community Affairs on June 23, 20]0. This Element provides specific objectives to promote the rehabilitation of substandard residences within the Immokalee Urban Arca. This Policy remains relevant and should be rctained. Howcver, thc Policy should be revised to remove the reference to "non-conforming" residenccs, so that it correlatcs with the Master Plan revisions that have no such policies. Policy 8.2: By 2008, Collier County shall complete a review of the residential density caps established within the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element of this Growth Management Plan. Based upon this review, the County shall determine if and where it may be appropriate to increase such caps, so as to encourage the development of new affordable-workforce housing units for farmworkers, very low, low and moderate income residents. Policy Achievement Analvsis: The residential density cap review was completcd as part of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP) Element re-write, transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs on June 23, 2010. The density caps were raised in certain sub-districts to 20 units per acre. This change would allow the development of an additional :!:6,730 dwelling units within the Immokalee Urban Area; presumably promoting affordable-workforce housing dcvelopments. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, as the Policy objective has been fulfilled. Policy 8.3: During 2004, the County completed a housing assessment survey of single family, multi- family, and mobile home units and mobile home parks in the Immokalee Urban Area, in order to determine the number of units that do not meet the County's current health, safety and minimum housing codes. The County shall target affordable-workforce housing and code enforcement programs to correct the conditions. 11 Housing Element Policy Achievement Analvsis: The County has completed a housing assessment survey of the Immokalee Urban Area by the date specified in the Policy. As part of the survey, the County identified units that did not meet the County's minimum housing codes. The County will continue to work with area residents to correct housing conditions, and will continue to implement programs to improve the housing stock in the Immokalee Urban Area. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to reflect the completion of the survey; and, include a reference identifying that activities are ongoing. Policy 8.6: Collier County will continue to utilize CDBG funds to provide farmworker-housing opportunities. In addition to housing units that currently qualify for assistance under SHIP program guidelines, special consideration of CDBG funds will be aimed at units that current SHIP program guidelines prohibit from assistance (i.e., mobile home units). Farmworkers will also be encouraged, through the use of multi-lingual outreach programs, to take advantage of any other CDBG, SHIP, Local, State, Federal and private programs for which they may qualify. Policv Achievement Analysis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be reyised to remove the second sentence, as the process for awarding Federal and State funds is competitive and not intended for set-asides. This Element is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statute, which were adopted into law in 2008, as follows: 163.31 77(6)(f)l.h. and i. Requires that the housing element include standards, plans and principles to be followed in energy efficiency in the design and construction of new housing and in the use of renewable energy resources. Ch. 2008-191, LOF. (HB 697) Staff proposed the below Objective and associated Policies to address these requirements. OBJECTIVE 9: Collier County shall support housing programs that encourage the development of energy efficient and environmentally sensitive housing. Policy 9.1 : The County will encourage the construction of energy efficient housing by exploring innovative regulations that promote energy conserving and environmentally sensitive technologies and design. Policy 9.2: The County shall educate the public about the economic and environmental benefits of resource efficient design and construction. Policy 9.3: The County shall expedite plan review of housing projects that promote energy conservation and design. 12 Housing Element Policy 9.4: The County shall continue to encourage the development of mixed housing types near employment centers in order to reduce Green House Gas emissions and minimize carbon footprints. Policy 9.5: The County shall promote the incorporation of US EPA Energy Star Building and Appliances programs into construction and rehabilitation practices. 13 Housing Element SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote... ", "The County shall continue to..." or "The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the tenns "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction. Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Policy 1.1.1 Policy 1.1.5 Policy 1.1.6 Policy 1.3.1 Policy 1.4.1 Policy 1.4.2 Policy 1.5.1 Goal 2 Objective 2.1 Modification based upon BCC action to adjust level of service from stated level. Deletion based upon rcmoval of facilities value' as a level of service standard by the BCC. Revision for clarification of the policy. Revision to promote alternative transportation routes to County owned parks to promote Green House Gas reductions. Revision for clarification of the policy, Revision to eliminate list of governmental providers of recreational facilities. Revision of policy to include open space. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. 1 Recreation and Open Space Element - Summary Policy 2.1.1 Policy 2.1.2 Policy 2.1.3 Policy 2.1.4 Policy 2.1.5 Goal 3 Objective 3.1 Policy 3.1.1 Policy 3.1.2 Policy 3.1.3 Policy 3.1.4 Policy 3.1.5 Policy 3.1.6 Policy 3.1.7 Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Modification and relocation based upon changes to treatment of neighborhood parks. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Deletion based upon neighborhood parks not provided by County. Revision based upon Goal 2 proposed deletion. Revision to reflect anticipated adoption of the Parks Master Plan. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering and elimination of assumption of automatic cost increases. Revision based on renum bering. Revision based on renumbering. Revision based on renumbering and potentially on outcome of Parks Master Plan. 2 Recreation and Open Space Element - Summary Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Introduction and Background Chapter 163.3177(6)(e), Florida Statutes, requires each local government comprehensive plan to have "A recreation and open space element indicating a comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation, including, but not limited to, natural reservations, parks and playgrounds, parkways, beaches and public access to beaches, open spaces, and other recreational facilities." However, Chapter 9J-5.014, Florida Administrative Code, which formerly contained the Florida Department of .. Community Affairs' "Minimum Standards" for review of local Recreation and Open Space Elements, has been deleted. Thus, while the Recreation and Open Space Element remains a requirement for local comprehensive plans in the State of Florida, the format and contents of such an Element may be tailored to local needs, provided that the intent of the Statute is met. The Recreation and Open Space Element is divided into three sections, each of which is guided by a specific goal. These three sections are: . The general provision of parks, recreation facilities and open space areas for the use and enjoyment of Collier County residents and visitors. . The development of a countywide neighborhood park system. . The development of a countywide regional and community park system. These three primary goals are the aims to which the Element's objectives and policies seek to accomplish. The second of the above goals is being proposed to be deleted as a standalone goal and is being proposed as a policy with revisions and clarification as to the responsibility for providing and maintaining these neighborhood facilities. The reason behind this proposed change sits with the fact that the County does not have a Level of Service Standard for neighborhood parks, as is the case with community and regional parks and does not provide these facilities on a regular or consistent basis, but rather seeks individual developments to provide for localized recreational facilities. Below is the evaluation of the existing Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Rose. GOAL 1: PROVIDE SUFFICIENT PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE AREAS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OF COLLIER COUNTY. Goal I adequately reflects mission statement of the Parks and Recreation Department. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Continue to ensure that a comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities is available from among facilities provided by the County, other governmental bodies and the private sector. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains as written. 1 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE The Objective is designed to specifically further Goal One by providing for recreational opportunities by the County based upon the availability of the various facilities provided by other providers and targeting the servicc gaps. Policy 1.1.1: Collier County hereby adopts the following level of service standards for facilities and land owned by the County or available to the general public: LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: A. 1.2882 acres of community park land/1 ,000 population (unincorporated) B. 2.9412 acres of regional park land/1,OOO population C. Recreation facilities - Facilities in place, which have a value (as (X) defined) of at least $270.00 per capita of population. A Construction Cost Index (CCI) adjustment will be used to determine the construction cost of facilities planned. The CCI that will be used will be the prior year of the County's fiscal year budget. 1. Value will be arrived at using the per unit values for each facility type available in the County, as set forth in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), applying the values to the number of each facility type, adding up all values and dividing the total by the County population. 2. Where recreation facilities provided by other governmental bodies or the private sector are available through arrangement with the County to the publiC on a convenient basis, they shall be considered in measuring in-place facility value. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County rccommends text revisions. The Board of County Commissioners determined during the 2007 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) that recreational facilities are no longer a Level of Servicc to be countcd in the AUIR. The Recreational facilities value was replaced with Recreational facility typc guidelines. Therefore the Recreational facilities LOS no longer is applicable and need to be deleted from the element. It was also directed that Community and Regional Park (LOSS) Level of Service acres per 1,000 be rounded down. Revise to 1.2 acres of community park land/1.000 population (unincorporated) 2.7 acres of regional park land/I ,000 population At the conclusion of the ROSE Objective and Policy analysis, a series of charts, graphs and maps will illustrate the Level of Service analysis for Regional and Community parks. Policy 1.1.5: Continue to correct or improve existing parks and recreation facilities deficiencies which are necessary in order to meet the level of service standards. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text for deletion. 2 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE The Board of County Commissioners determined during the 2007 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) that recreational facilities are no longer a Level of Service to be counted in the AUIR. The Recreational facilities value was replaced with Recreational facility type guidelines. Policy 1.1.6: The County shall continue to establish and implement a program with appropriate criteria to designate or acquire open space areas and natural reservations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. Current policy is confusing recommend clarifying by the following: The County shall continue to establish and implement a program with appropriate criteria to pursue and acquire open space areas and natural reservations. A series of community planning initiatives, begun in the late 1980s, culminated in 2001 with the Community Character and Design visioning process that brought to the forefront of community dialogues the need for a greenspace acquisition program. Currently, 28 other Florida Counties have similar, successful programs. The resulting initiative, "Vote Conservation 2002" placed a referendum question on the November 2002 ballot, asking voters whether they would be willing to tax themselves one quarter mill for I 0 years to buy conservation lands and greenspace and to approve a $75 million limited tax general obligation bond. Nearly sixty percent of Collier County voters approved the measure. As a result, the Conservation Collier Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2002-63) was developed, with citizen input and County Commission approval, to respond to identified conservation needs and make conservation and protection of environmental resources into a real plan for the future. In November 2006 Voters were again asked in a referendum "straw vote" question whether they understood and approved that the Conservation Collier Program would be funded by a quarter mill ad valorum property tax for a period of ten (10) years, until 2013, expected to raise approximately $189 million as opposed to limiting it to a $75 million program. Eighty-two percent (82%) of the respondents indicated that they understood the design of the Conservation Collier Program. Since 2004 the program has acquired 3,901.45 acres. A list of the property acquisitions and a map spatially depicting all property acquired through the program to date follows the ROSE section. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Protect designated recreation sites and open space from incompatible land uses through development of appropriate design criteria and land use regulations. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remain. Objective is adequate to meet current protections for designated recreation sites and open space and the issue of incompatible land uses has not been an issue with the existing inventory of park sites. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Continue to ensure that all public developed recreational facilities, open space and beaches and public water bodies are accessible to the general public. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text remain. 3 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Current objective embodies the need for public accessibility to facilities, open spaces and beaches. This priority has remained high on the agenda of the County since the 2004 EAR. Policy 1.3.1: County-owned or managed parks and recreation facilities shall have automobile, bicycle andlor pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where such access is economically feasible. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends tcxt revisions. With HB697-2008 energy conservation and efficiency requirements, the provision of energy efficient land use patterns, and strategies reducing green house gas, specific consideration should be given to alternative forms of transportation. Recommend amending policy to reflect: County-owned or managed parks and recreation facilities shall have automobile, bicycle and/or pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where such access is economically feasible, with specific consideration given to alternative forms of transportation that would reduce VMT and green house gas. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Continue formal mechanism to improve and coordinate efforts among levels of government and the private sector in order to provide recreational opportunities. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains. The formal mechanisms in place (Interlocal agreement process with the School District, Interlocal agreements with the state and municipal park providers and the land reservation through the public hearing process) is mecting the needs of the County to satisfy thc current level of service requirements. Policy 1.4.1: Through the land development review process, Collier County shall continue to encourage developers to provide recreation sites andlor facilities within residential and mixed use Planned Unit Developments (PUDs). PolicvAchievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions to the text. Recommend policy to reflect the following change: Through the land development review process, Collier County shall continue to encourage developers to provide recreation sites and/or facilities within residential and mixed use Planned Unit Developments (PUDs). where appropriate. The policy revision is a simple reflection that park sites are not appropriate and/or feasible in all PUD request. Policy 1.4.2: Collier County shall continue to coordinate the provision of recreational facilities and activities with other governmental jurisdictions that own or operate such facilities and activities within, or adjacent to, Collier County. Said governmental entities shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: U.S. Department of Commerce, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of the Interior, The National Park Service 4 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry Lee County, Florida Hendry County, Florida Broward County, Florida Miami-Dade County, Florida Monroe County, Florida The South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin Board The Collier County School Board The City of Naples, Florida The City of Marco Island, Florida Everglades City, Florida The City of Bonita Springs, Florida Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions. Deletion of everything in the policy after, "or adjacent to, Collier County." The County does not see the value in listing the specific entity and would not preclude coordination with an entity that was not listed or designated per the Policy. Policy 1.5.1: Collier County shall maintain a current inventory of recreational facility commitments made by developers through the development review process: Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends revisions to the text. Current policy should be amended to include open space commitments as well as recreational facilities to inventory. Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from Auzust 25. 2010 EAR Worhho/J - Add "and usable open space" after "recreational facility" in existing policy. OBJECTIVE 1.6: Whenever possible and practical, utilize County owned property for recreational uses. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remain. Current objective continues to be relevant and allows for land inventory to be dedicated to parks use when deemed appropriate by the Board. 5 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE GOAL 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROMOTE A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SYSTEM TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS WITHIN THE COUNTY. Goal Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recOlmnends Goal be deleted. OBJECTIVE 2.1: By the year 2010, the County Parks and Recreation Department will identify general areas where neighborhoods might request sites for future neighborhood parks. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the Objective be deleted. Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level. Policy 2.1.1: The Parks and Recreation Department will identify those sites or general areas for neighborhood parks with citizen input to determine the types of recreational facilities particular communities would like to see within their neighborhoods. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommcnds the policy be deleted. Neighborhood Parks are not invcntoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service for their provision has becn established by the County. Rccommend policies related to the Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level. Policy 2.1.2: The County shall amend the Land Development Code to require the developer of a residential PUD, or a PUD having a residential component, to provide its residents and guests with a suitable neighborhood park, as determined on a case-by-case basis, which is, as required by Policy 5.4 in the Future Land Use Element, compatible with the surrounding development. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be modified and relocated to current Objective Three. Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level. Additionally, this policy needs to be revised to delete the requirement of a "suitable neighborhood park" with the term recreational facilities and clarify the reference to Policy 5.4 of the FLUE to state, "as required by Policy 5.4 in the Future Land Use Element to be compatible with the surrounding development. Policy 2.1.3 New neighborhood parks will be carefully sited and intentionally integrated into existing residential neighborhoods, and shall be designed according to the principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), where these principles are appropriate and economically feasible. Neighborhood parks may also be co-located with churches, schools, or other recreational facilities. 6 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted. Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level. Policy 2.1.4: The County shall investigate the utilization of tax credits or other incentives for property owners who wish to dedicate land to the County to meet the recreational needs of neighborhood parks. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted. Neighborhood Parks are not inventoried in the Annual Update Inventory Report and no level of service for their provision has been established by the County. Recommend policies related to the Neighborhood Park system be met at the LDC level. Policy 2.1.5: The County shall encourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes from the surrounding residential communities to park sites. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the policy be deleted. With the elimination of the Goal and Objective above related to neighborhood parks, this isolated policy no longer has a larger connection to the ROSE. The policy of encouraging the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes to park sites from surrOlmding residential development is still sound and good policy to better promote individual mobility options and promotes a healthy lifestyle, but the policy is already expressed in Policy 3.1.6 of the existing element GOAL 3: THE COUNTY SHALL DEVELOP A COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS WITIllN THE COMMUNITY. Goal Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends Goal be revised. The Goal needs to be renumbered to reflect the deletion of Goal 2 and expand upon the full integration of mobility options to the County's park system as suggested below. GOAL 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROMOTE A PARK SYSTEM THA T INCLUDES REGIONAL, COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WITH PEDESTRIAN PA THWA YS AND BIKE LANES TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREA T10NAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) CONTAINED IN THE CIE). OBJECTIVE 3.1: By the year 2010, the Parks and Recreation Department will develop a Community and Regional Park Plan to provide larger parks and recreational facilities as well as passive open space within a 15 to 20 minute drive of residents within the coastal Urban Designated Area, the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, and Northern Golden Gate Estates (this excludes Conservation designated areas, Agricultural/Rural designated areas, Southern 7 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Golden Gate Estates, and the outlying Urban Designated Areas of Copeland, Port of the Islands, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee). This plan will include the identification of future community and regional park sites (or general areas), park improvements, cost estimates, and potential funding sources. The principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) will be integrated into the planning and development of the Community and Regional Park sites. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. The County has been unable to complete the Parks Master Plan by 2010, but at the time of the transmission of the EAR to the Department, the majority of thc work on the Master Plan will be in progress with the completion of the effort to occur in 20 II. The policy will be revised to reflect the adoption of the Parks Mastcr Plan by the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 3.1.1: The Parks and Recreation Department will acquire land to meet the needs of the Community and Regional Park Plan, including sufficient land to allow for a portion of these sites to remain in passive open space. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County rccommcnds text revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. The policy still reflects current intent related to meeting the needs of Community and Regional Park Acquisition. Policy 3.1.2: The Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for the design and construction of all new community and regional parks. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County rccommends tcxt revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. The Parks Recreation Department shall continue to be responsible for the design and construction of all new community and regional parks. Their professional knowledge concerning park design is essential in the development of these projects. The construction of all new facilities will be designed to satisfY the currcnt Level of Service Standards contained in the ROSE and the CIE. Policy 3.1.3: The County shall continue to partner with Collier County Public Schools to co- locate parks in conjunction with new school sites as such sites are identified and developed andlor to provide County recreational programs at Collier County Public Schools' facilities. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. This policy meets current need and promotes the concept of co-location expressed within the Public Schools Facilities Element (PSFE) of the GMP. Policy 3.1.4: The County shall continue to update parks and recreation impact fees to keep pace with increased land acquisition and development costs for the establishment of community and regional parks. 8 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. In addition, recommend removing the text increased from the policy due to current economic environment and providing for a predetermination of market value. Policy 3.1.5: The County shall investigate the utilization of tax credits or other incentives to encourage property owners to dedicate land to the County to meet the recreational needs of community and regional parks. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. Current policy meets the needs of the acquisition oflands related to regional and community parks. Policy 3.1.6: The County shall encourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes from the surrounding residential communities to park sites where general public access can be supported. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. Current policy meets the needs of the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes. Policy 3.1.7: By the year 2010, the Parks and Recreation Department and the Transportation Services Division will investigate the utilization of the existing canal and power line easements to create a greenway system within the coastal Urban Designated Area, the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, and Northern Golden Gate Estates (this excludes Conservation designated areas, AgriculturallRural designated areas, Southern Golden Gate Estates, and the outlying Urban designated areas of Copeland, Port of the Islands, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee). Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text revisions. The numbering will need to be changed to reflect deletion of Goal 2. This effort has been initiated and will be integrated as a component of the Parks Master Plan. The policy may be revised further based upon the conclusion of the Master Plan effort. 9 Recreation and Open Space Element - ROSE Pages 10 and 11 Blank Recreation and Open Space Element Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption Hearing J2 " " " c ~ ~ ~ :;; " :;; c ~ . "- " :;; "- .- . "C ~ " . -+-1 "0 :;; "- aJ "'" 0 . ~ ~ c: 0 "- "'" ~ Ql t 0; -c 0 ~~.~ . Cl 0 c ~ ~ - 0- .0 E 0" ~ Ql .c 0 . ~2b '" -0. E "C ..J ~ . 0 c u c . Z '" U ::J W:::::.,^- ... . ~.' -------1 *1 5\ HENDfY COU~~Y__ gslll:l::J ,/ ~ . '" ~ -.- - ~ -..;.' o " j " . " o N ~ efA, S3dli1t)}j3^3'" ..:.'(~ I;j ~ / n 1 " " " ~ o ~ ~ e~ o " o ",~^ N --.I p 0: . -, @ < " o o " u " ~ o o " o " "-_'1- , # I I " " < . ;; ~oc w ~ 0< ~~ ~ ~~~g~ ~~ ~6 ~~~ 5 ~~~~w<i<~<~~~ ~a ~r~~. oc~<~Q~_~C~~<~ ~ W ~ t~.Q~ ~ ~r~~~~~~~~z~~ oc~oc~ r~~~~~~o < rt~~zz~z~zi~o ~~~~~<~~~wg~~ ~ ~~~~JJzJZJ~ZU ~z<~<~r~~~Z<w W z~ZO~~w~~~OJw oc~~o~w~ O<Q~ 0 J~io~~~~~~o~~~o~~zocwz~o~oo~~ ~ ~o~ocoowO~O~~oo~w~~OOCJO~OI~< ~ ~oo,oo~oooOo~O~~w<mo~ocx2~w~~~ OrOWWW wOwJow~<~ocoOCW2WWWI~ZOC 0< w~~~w~wowwo ~o~~~o>~~ wWCW ~m~~~~~~~~:~~~~<~~o~~~~~;~~~~ ~~~I~~~~2~~~~o~~~~g~~~~~~~~go w~><oo~~~~>oowo<oo~O<Oow02Zw~ ~~~x~~OCW~oZ~202mOoOC~ZocZ~2~WWoc ~~>~gg8~a~~~~~~~mg~g~g~~!~~~~ . ~ " OlJdO ~ " z. ,~ ,. O~NM~~~~~~O~NM~~~~~~O~N~~~~~~ ~~~~~MM~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .;: ~ ~ ~~ " 0::0:: "" <( <(<( ,.,: 0:: a. a. a. "..: ~~ >- Co ~<( 0... "" ..... 00 ~..:c..-~c<< z ~o~"o..co::g 0..0.. 6 ,.,: ~~~~gg~~ gg~ u ~ ~ mgcao~oo ~~< ~ ~ 0.. ~ ~ %%OO%oOm o::o::c..wo::~ w ~ <( U ~~o~~m~a oogww~ ~~ ~,.,: a. u ~W~"mao::w ~~o~~c.. <0 00:: o~< zoo~-oz 00%00::0:: c..< 0< ~<C% ~~~~~~~w ww~<o..~ ~w w~ ~o..~ ,.,: o::<oozwow ZZm%%~ <~,.,:o::< O~W,.,:o:: ~jw~w~~<,.,:~~a~~w~~~~ffi~~~~~~~ >-;zN~~c~~~zw~~~o::~~c..3a<>~Uc..>-0 m<~~-uz~c..o<z..........o<C~~w~wc..~ 0::00"':0 %z~~o::~<~ ~~o::oo~c..m~woo::~m=<<ooN o<<~~~~-jooowoo<o::o::o<coz o::<~mww ~uw525~~ww~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~5~ ~~~~<g~~~~~~~~g5~~~~g~5~5~i~ ~o..o::<c...oowo~za.mmou>zozoomo~ooo<z -N~~~~~W~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0' ~ . o " ~ u o ~ ~ < x 12 Recreation & Open Space Element 2009 AUIR REGIONAL PARK SUMMARY FORM Facility Tvpe: Regional Park Land (Category A) Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 29 3CI1.000 countywide Unit Cost: $230,000/ac Using the peak season countywide population, the following is set forth: Available Inventory as of 9/30/09 Required Inventory as of 9/30/14 Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) Acres 112168 1252.90 75300 62178 Value $257.986,400 $288,167,000 $173.190,000 $143,009,400 Expenditures Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14 acquisitions Total Expenditures $173.190.000 $173,190,000 Revenues Proposed added value through commitments. leases and interdepartmental transfers Total Revenues $173,190,000 $173,190,000 Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS none Recommended Action: Staff recommends to the BCC approval of the Regional Park Land "Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14" projects for inclusion in the 2010 CIE. BCC Motion: The BCC motioned for approval of the 2009 Regional Parks A lIlR component as presented. The motion passed 5 to O. 'Note: Unit Cost $230.000/ac is based on 2009 Impact Fee Study. 13 RecreLlfio/l & (Jpen 5/pllce Element ~ .9 ..1;1 ~ "3 " c. <( 0 'Co. '" ~ 0 5~g <(,,~ g~~ Nm~ gO! 'c,C'l " .. "'lll o ...J 315i!~~~~~~ C acDcDcDcDcDcD ~ ~"COOOlt)O",," (nmCDCIOCO.... fi~f8~~~ "'O;c"NNNN....'It .,.-~..,..,.... 000000 Hl~IOOOOOO .... 000000 ... c:OcDcOmN'''': 5~ ~g:;;;:g:~ Oll! C'\I It) """~ N .....~ N~ ai .wCOCO..........COClO NNNNNN .........-.,. -~ !!lz ~~ ~~ ri ~~ I!!~ ... ~ml ~~! ~~ ~8 NNNN1P.CO en 10 cn co '~ "": Moic"':~'\'"" c.~~::'It)~ CIOCOCOCOCOCO c.l:!tDcocotOCO ...uillicilti..r NNNCD......... ..................._~<<t ..... T"'.......... _..... o 0 gggqg~~ . . Lri I,() cD f"') 0: "ItoU)~.,,;e ~2i::;:~io .ouicOccic:iN~ IOfDCIOOf")IO"," "":...._"":.~N~C"<tCb ........................ .... CO"'mcnCDN ~ ~ ...._~t.;j_a f7i,p0>> CD"'" N ~~~:;~~ ~~ u. ~ ~ o N 6 ~ o N ~~~~~~i~ 800000...0 NNNNNNC)N ~ .. GO ~ ~ III ~ oeooo 00000 ...."It"lt ~cD"":cDCO- cn ON '''It.... N....IO....("') ~ T"'-"": ri' ri M("')MCOCD ~;:t~;:t~ ggggg ooooc ~-~iMS U)....C"')~ID Mm.o....:.....~ cncno......... NNMMf"') ...............,. COClO coco co MIOMIt)..... ~~!~5 COClOClOClOCO .....U).....coU) an";cOM<o:t ....""'............... oococooc ...:....-...:NN o 00100 ~~,..:C! 00 M..... ~ 000000 OO.....ClQ-~o~ ~S~;tiailri NMMMC")NN ~ - - - -.... N ................... ..... ;:!:t;~~t! N(hClOcn.... ~-~~;5 '" '" '" ..; '" ;;;~ ~O ON N' J,~ ~O ON N - ;;;~fi 2222C)C: ~ CO .. " ,,>- >-6 J,~ 'C- ~~ o ~ 0'" OM ..'" ~O> N'" "'''' ~.. 1~ u .~ 5 CO a. ~ ~ (J) li .c4>~~..:.:::~m g~t'l](ijrot'O() ctlo.D...a.a..a.g lri:3:3:;::;:::.;::; lri l!? .~ .~ .9:? .~ ..5 Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'C art(Urocuro'E a..a:lCClDCOUlO lllD.....!R..m..m..mU o.ij'a..o.o..a.li) E:B.S.S.~.sg- U5 C)Cf)(I)(/}(I)(ij Q) co Q) <Il l1> Q) > (fg~~~(E~ o.E:ouuuo ro 0 ro ctI <<l ro al ocooaoor--. l.O(J)~lOlOL{)"\t mCri6NNC0~;.jlri<<:)r:..:oococoCri 880000000000000 NNN"';'l~NNNNNNNC'\lNN cba)c.>>~..-Nc>?J,.J..ocDt!.r!..~ob g88000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN " :. 0. ro -1: co <0 0 a.. "g> ~a:: 0"0 ~ "g> ~ ro a::~ a. 'C ~ E fij ~ o ]! ~ ~ ~ -g ~ ~ U ~ '* ~~~ fij 8$<( ~ .Ql ~ C '" -J!l CD ~ <Il "0 cl-.5 ffi fii ~ Q) S"E ~~&~aig ~~~E~U I-m.=oroO o'E:;Uo..~ t~~-5~~ 0_(1) 0 iDu. 't~m-5E~ (Ucn---lCJ)uro :g1ri~~~~ uiN"I,f"McP<O 14 Recreation & Open Space Element a:: o '" '" Q) Ci ~ o 0> ,jj '0 ro > 0. Ci 0. <0 o o al B 13 Q) 15' " en "' '" i" 0. ~ o 0>-1: iDlE :5 ~ ~l 'C tV eal o Q) 0,,- GO E g-U5 Q) ~ 6;LL o Q Q <0 <00 00 '" SaJ3\1 w-) c0 l..() lC) -<, -- "' C, ...; :.oj ~ ~ ~ r- ~ c. 0 T ~:' () "S C', 0J 0 7", 0J -<-, '1(, <9", '" " ' ~ I' '-. cO III -,,~ 0 .~ N ~ "'... co OS'_ ~ ~ r-'- ~ c: Cl N 0 -t/> -.--- ~ ". 0)/.', '1 ~ ','1-r> J f'-- " \9'-- :": ~ j ~,..)c.Oo'/-:'. ~ cD Q. ~ 0 "'-. 'S.", Cl ll.. " -"", -, N ___u__ , 0 " "-1" " 0 ',,- '1(, I <0 :0 0 " 6>- I, ~ J)l .... ~. " ,,-"'''.''' "-", ~,. J, 'n; - 0:;'- ~ J: Ul ',,::$'. " Co Cl . ., C ~ " -""" N '" 'C m \ ~ (,) " "0.';.. ftll:: <( -, - '1(" ()~ ~ co :i ''-. <9",'. ., -! ~ , O'! . ". ..;. t ,\0S'~"'t 00. N "'''' ~ \ 0 , ' ",a. \ N 1Il v ]i 0 \ ~ 1Il 0" \ ..- 0 .,0 ~ ~ 'S ..J 0>'" , ~ '" a. ~ 0:: Ul \ 0 j CD \ ll:: N .... U (,) en '" <( i 0 ~ ., ~ , .x ., N C .... co ~ 0 III \ <0 0 .'" ll.. N .. J!l ~ ns iii , N 0 c: , ~ a. .2 ~ I , , ~ Cl I ~ 0 CD 0 I \ N IX: ., --1--\ IX: co ~ N \ <0 -. ~ ::> , 0 <( I ~ 0 '" N 0 '" 0 " N c: 0 ltl ~ ]1i m '" 0 0 .<:: N f- -'" ... ~ 0 "' a. 0> t E 0 0 , 00 Q. 0 0 u " 0 ltl '" N '" -t--- ~ '" LL 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 co 0 co 0 '" 0 lli '" <0 co co '" ..- ..- '" UOnBlndod N /5 Recreation & ()fJ(;,fl ,\'pan! r.'leml!nl 2009 AlIIR SUMMARY FOR'" Facility Tvpe: Community Park Land (Categmy c\ I Level of Service Standard (LOSS): i.2 ad I J)()O in the uninc\lrporakJ ar~a Unit Cost: $230,000/ac Using the peak season unincorporated population, the following is set forth: Available Inventory as of 9/30/09 Required Inventory as of 9/30/14 Proposed AUIR FY 09/1 0-13/14 5-year Surplus or (Deficit) Acres 54454 457.10 (47.00) 40.44 Value $125,244,200 $105,133,000 $ 10,810,000 $ 9,301,200 Expenditures Proposed loss of value through interdepartmental transfer Total Expenditures $10,810,000' $10,810,000 Revenues Impact fees allocated to fee simple acquisitions Total Revenues $0 $0 Revenues needed to maintain existing LOSS none Recommended Action: Staff recommends to the BCC approval of the Community Park Land "Proposed AUIR FY 09/10-13/14" projects for inclusion in the 2010 CIE.. BCC Motion: The BCC motioned for approval of the 2009 Community Parks AUIR component as presented. The motion passed 5 to O. . Transfer of Community Park Land results in decrease in total value of inventory only. Level of Service Standard is met after reduction. 'Note: Unit Cost $230,000/ac is based on 2009 Impact Fee Study. /6 Recreation & Open Space Element c: 0 "" '" <II :; !! Q. " 0 04: D- e;; "" 0 ~ 0 => '" 0 04: D-~ 0> ~U; 0 "2 e 0 ::l " 00 E 04: E "! 0 ~ 0 rn rn 0 ..J ~W ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 I I ~~l 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 I -:- -:" t .; .; .; .; .; .; ..,~ ~~ I '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" I I ;;f~ 00 00 00 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ..; ..; ..; .; .; .; .; .; .; ottf ..,~ I 15~'" 00 00 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... , C~I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "!. 0 0 0 "!. 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 .; M N <Ii .; 0 ~ Iii - ..; 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 '" ... '" ... '" 0 '" 00 I oi ... '" '" ~ ~ 0 0> 0> 0 0> ~~ll <Ii ...- .,; ~ "," ",- ...- .; 0 M ..; '" 0> 0> 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~~ l ... :x :x ... ... -: ... ... ... iD I .JW 0 "! 0> ~ co '" ... ... 8:g .. 0 '" .0 0 '" ..; .,; 0> I 00 00 ~ ... .,; ~ i ::1"- ~ ~ ~ '" ... ... '" 00 ~ rnj!l I I - WW ! cr:...l ~S ... :x :x :; :x :x ... :x :x :x :x '" '" ~ ~ ~ ... ...: ...: ...: ...: ...: ...: ...: ~~ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I~ CC !Sf fiC!!!; 0' 0' 0' o(~::l C! 0 0 0 :o:~: ... ...: 0 ...: :!. :!. 0 :!. !io..- tc u~g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(-'" II! 0 0 "! '" ~ Ul ... ... 00 "! 0 0> '" ~~! 0" '" 0 .0 ...: ui .,; ..; '" ~ .. ui ..; 0000 '" -: -: '" '" '" ... co 0> 0 ... co ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... '" Q. '" .. .. 0 ... '" ~ ~ ... 0 '" 0 ~ ... '" ~ 0 ... ... 0 '" .... ... 0 "!. "!. .. ... "!. '" 0 C ,.; ..; ,.; '" ... 0 ...- .. ~ .,; ,.; W '" '" '" '" ... .. .. .. 0 0 .... ~~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~f 0> ~ 0 0> 00 00 ... ~ '" ::I~ 0 .,; .,; o..u '" '" '" f!: I z ::l I ~ ;;; r<>r ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 N 00 00 .:, , . 0 '" ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 00 00 00 - 0> '" ... - '" - 1 ~~ 0 ~ 00 1 '" ... co 0> t <;> ~ ~ ";' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .;. .:, N . . . . . .0 co ~ '" ... '" '" ... 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Cl "- 00 00 00 00 00 00 Cl 00 00 00 00 00 Cl ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" .. .. ~ >;- >;- 0 '" "'~ - ... ]j <II i c: ~ 00 0 t' m "- m c o a, OJ oc u c m u; ;< OJ 1:; '" ~ :s o OJ CD ro u c .!'! ~ :u "- m c o a, i" .2 OJ OJ c m .c <..l >< OJ C ~ .2! '" c g ro c OJ E t m "- OJ U Q; C OJ C ::l o ro u c m oc <..l m ~ ~ N ~ o '" o N ReCr~ali()n & ()pen ,)'pace Elemem r saJ~';t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 N 0- N c- N 0- N 0- N ro 0- C- (0 (0 u') lD ..,. ..,. m ~ \ . cO ~ 0 \ N \ CO \ ~ ~ t'- ~ c: 0 0 \ N J ,~ +:: 1 ..!!! 0- ~ :::l J, C. ~ 0 0 ll.. I N 0 t- r-f 0 '" q ~ , .... .. "" ~ OJ - 0 ~ UI N e '" I OJ , U "" ~ or:( ~ , N .. .... i ~ t .... 0 N , Ul ~ ~ Ul .... 0 ~ 'S , .. C') 0- ...J ~ OJ 0 a:: UI j-- N ~ CIl c----------. -'-'-~ --~ ------~-j .. , ~ u , C') or:( .1 ~ "" , , .lO: I N C 1 ~ .. I 0 0 III , N '" I OJ ll.. S ~ N 1;1 ~ c: , , ~ :::l ~- ~ ! I E 0 N I_I E ----..- 0 I ~ () I ~ / <I> , g:; r 0 ~- ~ :JE! 0 ~ , t- o ()c N or:( , -t-1- 16~ ------!------ ------- ------ en 'Ot: 0 0 0 C m ~ 0 t m a. ~ 0, N a::<I>~ 0 , I I o"E tIJ 0 I , N ___-I ~--L-_ -I-+- m<l>C - r----l!! , 'V.~ ..... ! 1 I I m 0 . I , co I I 0 1 0 N , - ---+------- ---------- ----i- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci 0 0 ci 0 0 on 0 on 0 "" 0 on '" '" on "" .... .... C') UOl\elndod 1/1, Recreation & Open Space Element ~.,-,----~.,-- Ow"" N.m,'B"'l"''' Name _ ,_ + P~~;~'~ r 'ota' A""lOat. C"",ct ",""J 1 Oat~~o:::as._to~~act~mo""t ~ C~t pee AC",__ ~;:::-~-'-" --------,------- - -~-,- - - --I - - -- -I _ _1-__ ___ '" ?~~{]~~~e: -- - r- --t --~--__+_--- ---------- ---~----- .-.--- i +--~-- ,--.--- ___+-__-- ,,-' "'<==-- ----t-===t=---' _=1=_==,,_21:"', _[-7,: ,- '=}-- A '3!::__ r---"C7; "'-=- I '"''";::.:'~" "f.t~~ ~ ~~~ ~::.:-:: ~~::::Of::~ GGE u -, ,""d----ta----~,=_=_r-:-,.2'CTi- --iSi:;C-,~ I''] 780 -=--S;; Jce = GGE U 5J 3tewar - I ' T ! :'; _~+_ 1~-270".i --- -,,--,. ,J9.' 17'0.: $~0.70C 59386 GGE U :),1 Zak _ T ~~_~}___~ j7"'27'O.~ _________ 1(/1)1'0.1 S30,000 :510989 GGE U 53 B~ardsl2f _ I )727'0,; ____ ~~.. 'J912410.l 539,000 ~:: 2~~__ GGE U53 BeardsleyT,l:s: ~!l _'____ Ji'!27,(,~ 12/16;0;; $11,90C ),'".:).,l," GGE U 53 Cassidv 1 ' , , ')7'27,'04 10101,0.4 S 10,70'; 5-038f; GGE U 53 H.Jmiltcn 1 tSJ -t-- F'27-0.\ ,. ~ 'J9:170.~ $15,00C SJ4.3~ 6~~ . ~I:; . ~~~~;'::~ 1;~ I - ~~;f~;'~~ H_ -+ ;;;:~~:~~ ~~~,;~~ 5S'9~8~; GGE U 53. ':i!no1c)I' ')~, 1---- ").'12'0" : 1 L'HO.~ $16JOO 510,503 GGE U5J.Pncp I I.. 1')112/0"> l;:11,OJ $12,000 $IIJ326 GGE.'U5J Krll' -- --,-- -t 'i'''; ~Lil,05 +f_ --"'()1'28,G:j SU,OOO :511JO'o12 G<3E ,-,53 8ia:\\' ., 111.0:', ')12.30:; $13,;)00 5; .1(J4 GGE U 5J T8~Jelhuif ____2.;?_~:__,__!---___::..L~.:,i.>:: T ;,~,nC;:S~5,J<JC '5'1 :;;33 I ' ! 3313 i 'JAT" :~nr'o"-' Malt '----. W Head - Senecharles W Head Fallowfield W Head - Lubber,> 'N,ltliIOS! Jones .:'57 W Head Cooke :53 iN Hedd MOrelll) , , GGE U 51 Sill GGE U 51 Goddard '1-.7':1 159 School Board Section 24 "15 McJnt0sh T, 57'S WH Lockwood '. 1,~ GGE U 5) .Graham GGE U 53 Santos GGE U 53 Snay GGE U5J~Sunshtnp. Trust GGE US3 Gonzalez 2 1 1 j 1 1027 5 .U4 4.D.I ~ 1.-.1 Collier Development Corp 47'.93 GGE U 53 Briceno GGE U 53 Ballweg/Horman GGE U 53 Petisco GGE U 53 McBean 456 479 ... i ~ 8rochu :1;;6 Milano GGE LJ 53 Ramirez 1846 5 GGE USJ Howerv/Hutchison 2,n Oettin Karen 2 :.28 0.03 i CALC CONNOLl'f TR PRICE RiVERSlPREDMCI~!: ..1" ,'I -:- 2':, ,"(lNcCI4.'jAII()N" "I 'F!" 'c.'' 1,1 i , t 1---')4r26i05 ---t I 05;10/05 I 06,'1),0':> \J5,~70:: , --,- 06/2."0.:' a8i05,05 , ~:26,r;5 u f':S,2.ti05 --, ~;3 1 ')i)'~ -;- ;'),'24']~- C722,'Cf5 r ! r'GT'J:j _I 03,,-'I:ll05 ~~'03/05 09/23,05 5.i 750,COO 530.JOO $37000 $J7000 $.>:61),1)00 540,000 536,00G $J2,000 530,000 $2,112.500 557105 52ti 3';3 p324!)6 n245t3 38C .'SB' ~25 I:i' 5':: :.'502 $' ',636 '3 '(~ 86.;3 $J2~(JO 10/23/05 $711,983 $105J12 'Contract $830,000 TransportatIOn $118,01'~ ;2;16;05 , --,-- 02.'24/06 03/31106 04/01106 031J1/06 i)5i2,I.'Qj ~6, 1 ~,C 5 06:14,-0<; 09'-13:05 Q'MJ/05 I '7 r 11:01:'05 0../07/06 06/09/06 06/09/06 06123/06 06123/06 $45.000 $370,000 S 193,000 $164.000 $160,000 FO,OOO 52.085,900 $172,000 $175,000 $100,000 5180,000 3J\:lA~4 536G27' $33.360 $38,679 $39604 '}61404 S43520 $36,910 $36534 $36.63C $36.000 Ol:l/25ID6 $440,000 $47,o1f.l : Tvntract $460.000 Public ;Jtilities $20,000 , 07,'28/06 ;)7,114106 10120107 06/11/07 06/13/0:- -' D7'02/G7 10/JO/07 - 'i-- 07i-<;:;/O~ ,. ty' Bec 1;10/06 BGG 1/24/06 BCe 2/28/06 BCC 2/28/06 BCe 2128106 Bce 2/23/06 Bee 4125/06 Bce 4/25/06 Bee 5123/06 Bce 5123/06 a,>,:; 6120106 8 (',~ 6120'-06 Bee 6/20/06 Bee 9/26/05 Bec 3/27'07 Bee 4124/07 ace 5122,'07 BCe 5/22107 sce 5,'22/07 .,( }) .~ I() Necrt!lition {\- ()!!e!1\nil' 'J' J-,,/,,*,,,,..t $4,950,000 '5180,000 $88.500 $50,000 S886,5CO 527Q.GOO $472,500 : l:}~ 'JOG .~" <,,"l,"l 11268 1~7 $36.000 $38,987 $21,930 $1.303,676 $6750 !~ 750 $6750 ';61332 DATE erJi2(}1Q '~JNSLRVAr:ON GOLc.:ER JAHCE'- ST.\TS <.;lEPOi'F :.:yr:u, . 1- No. Olf 'f Total Acres 1 Date Contract signed Date Purchase I r t etA t Cost per Acrf. Owner NameJBusiness Name Parces Closed "on ra moun -~ ~ SCHERER ~ ,~___+_~cc ~:22i07 ".'16'''- I ~54G'I'~ $675~_ J, II;, ! .J ...", RR LAND TRUST 16 55,03 .~_~cc 5'2:1/07 O~122/07 , 10,>550 QDD $1_93,5J~_ -~ -~- -- S ta mes/ Ad kl ns/B ic ke 1 2 367,7 BCe 7.'24/07 12/17/07 $S,:3J2,JOG $14,501 1--- RJS, LLC f------ BCe 3/25/07 11/16/07 \ 202,500C;; $6,750 1 30 W Head - Berman Tr 1 1q BCe 10/23i07 12/17/07 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Armes 1 114 Bce 10/23/07 01i14/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Medina 1 1,1~ Bce 10/23/07 {I 1114/08 $26,220 $23000 W Head. Rickard Tr 1 114 BCe 10/23/07 iJ1114i08 $26,220 $23.000 W Head - Cisko 1 159 Bee 10/23107 02/11/08 36,570 $23.000 W Head - Haschker 1 159 Bee 12/11/07 ()2/19108 $36,570 $23,000 W Head - Medina, Antonia 1 2.27 BCe 12/11/07 02/25/08 $43, no '519 000 W Head - Sanchez 1 227 Bce 12/11/07 03103108 $43.130 $19000 W Head - Foanini 1 114 BGe 12/11/07 03/10108 $26,220 $23.000 W Head - erookall 1 2.73 BCe 12/11107 03/10/08 $51,870 $19,000 W Head. Camero 1 1.14 BCC12/11i07 03/17/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head . Paz I 1 14 BCe 12/11/07 03/17108 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Miaenes 1 114 BCe 1115108 03111/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Torrino/Toro 2 2.73 BCe 1i15/08 03/17/08 $62,790 $23,000 W Head - Reaalado 1 1.14 BGC 12/11107 03/24/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Mohabir 1 1 14 BeC 12!11/07 03/24108 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Frazier 1 1.14 BCe 12/11/07 03/24/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head. Berger Tr. 1 114 BCe ni11!07 03/25/08 $26,220 $23.000 W Head - Hunt 1 1U BCe 12/11f07 03/25/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Lanahart 1 1,14 BGG 12/11/07 04102/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head. Lewis I 114 BCG 12/11/07 04/07/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head. Hitt 1 114 Bce 1/15108 04/07/08 $26,220 $23,000 W Head - Natsch 1 159 BCe 1/15/08 05f05fOa $36,570 $23,000 W Head - Bennett 1 1.14 BCe '1/29/08 05119108 $26,220 $23,000 GGE - U53 - Oevisse Tr. 1 865 BCG 5i27108 06/13/08 $137,033 $15,842 Freedom Park 1 12.5 BCe 5/13/08 G6i19f08 $56,300 $4,504 GGE . U53 - Berman Tr. 1 114 BGe 5/21/08 06/30/08 $18,060 $15,842 Freitas 1 2.21 BCe 5;'27/08 01/14/08 $43,130 $19,000 W Head. O'Rourke 1 114 BCe 5,'27108 07/21/08 $26,220 $23,000 GGE _ U53 . Stiffler Specialties. Inc 1 114 BCe 6:24108 09/22108 $18,060 $15,342 GGE . U53 - GAG Parcel I 7.38 BCe 6:24108 10/08108 $116,914 $t5,842 GGE . U53 - Berman 1 114 BCe 5/21/08 01/26/09 $18,060 $15,842 GG E- U53- Celsnak Tr. 1 1.14 BCe 5i21108 02/23/09 $18,060 $15,842 Kaye Homes. Inc 3 400 Bce 5/27.'08 ~ 2!01iQ8 $3,12,250 $83.063 Van Cleave 4 38.12 Bec 9/23/08 12/15/08 $2,942,800 $76,002 Trinh 1 80 Bce 9123!08 12/15/08 $760,000 $9,500 Gangilosi 1 4.56 Bee 9123/08 12/22108 $346,000 $75,877 Maloney Tr. 1 10 BGC 9/23/08 12/22108 $736,500 $73,650 Stirns 1 97 Bce 9/23f08 11t22108 $703,000 $72,474 GGE - U53 - Beardsley Tt 1 114 Bee 10/28108 e2/09/09 $18,060 $15,842 GGE - U53 - Blake 2 2.73 BCe 10/28/08 02/09/09 $43,249 $15842 GGE - U53 . Ceslank Tr 1 1.59 BCe 10/28/08 01/12/09 $25,189 $15,842 GGE - U53 - Flores 2 4,32 BCe 10/28/08 02/09/09 $68,438 $15,842 GGE . U53 - Jackson 1 159 BCe 10/28/08 02/23/09 $25.189 $15.842 GGE . U53 - Jones 1 2.27 BCG 10/28/08 03/09/09 $35,961 $15,842 GGE - US3 - Kissinger 1 1.59 BCe 10/28/08 02:09/09 $25.189 $15,842 GGE - US3 - Less 1 1.14 BCe 10/28/08 03116/09 $18,060 $15,842 GGE - US3 - Neri 1 4.48 BCC 10/28/08 02t23/09 $10,972 $15,842 GGE - U53 . Rosillo 1 5 BCe 10/28/08 02/09/09 $79,210 $15,842 GGE - U53 - Sheckler 1 2.21 BGC 10/28/08 02/09/09 $35,961 $15,842 GGE + U53 - Shrvock 1 114 BceIO/28/08 02/23/09 $18,060 $15,842 GGE. US3 - T()ldeo 1 349 BCe 10/28108 02/23/09 $55,289 $15,842 W Head - Jones 1 1.59 BCe 10128/08 03/09i09 $26,036 $16.375 Lake Trafford Ranch LLLP IPenper Ranch) 10 2,511.90 BCC11/10/08 C 2/06109 $32,525,080 $12,948 -- Camo Keias . Tucker 1 10 BCe 12/16/08 G4/13109 $25 000 $2,500 Garnn Keias + Bortnick 1 5 Bee 12/16/08 04/13/09 $12,500 $2,500 Camn Keias + Darbv 1 5 BCC 12116/08 04/27/09 $12,500 $2,500 Camp Keias - Griffin I 5 Bee 12/16/08 06/08109 $12,500 $2,500 Camo Keias - Schaab , 2.5 Bce 12/16/08 05/11109 $6,250 $2.500 GGE - U5J - Oepestre Coba 1 4.54 __f}c;C !U1&/q_~__ 03/30!09 $719Z3 $15842 20 Recreation & Open (o)DaCe j.'jpmpnf JA r::; ai"./21'~:; - - ---- -- ~---I i I I f- GGE U5J Rey GGE U5J Tauber Vol Head Ponce W Head Pacheco W Head Calluccio W Head Mueld Trjan~le UcensH1q Corp W Head Fislorek W Head - Stark Ri'''ers Road D(!visse T( Nancv Payton Preserve Kirb Nancl/ Pal/ton Preserve Murnhv W Head Lanakil Total Purchased/Under Contraci ,)!'/ ::;f Nacies 4 :!:} 3cr~s ':i66 , , , '" 2,'1' .- ---Ts-j--'-r I !.:t , I 29 :1:! , 1 1.1 , 1 1.1 .t_B.J I , I 1 1 1 114 192 -tOOO.O: '- !:; -- ..w:" "'tiAT'nN ';;;1 : FR , .. "," .,- ,.\ 1-' "~ '<I' 'c-, Contract Amount Cost per Acre __ $3',;.5;;:: _ $15842__ $39,6053 ! '5 842 I $78,1()" _ $15,842 .~ ___"_. :518,S6a _-L.__~~~J~_ -tn ~~a,,'}130,-.t- 3::3 :'\42 u_ 579,2'1.: 1___ :)':),342 $35,96, _:5 !S342 '526.036 3' 3 --"~ ~18,663 ~ $'6,r5 $.91,875 :5!6J~S )12.500 ~2S,]I' Bee 2/24/09 BCe 2/24109 Bee 2/24/09 ace 2124/09 05111IQ9 ,)5(11/09 ')5/11103 05/1110S 8e L: j;24;09 , 1.1/12/C9 '3CC ]'2410S I 16i08/(!{J I , 8(.(; 6/23109 'J8i1J/r;S 8Ce 12/15/09 ()L08/1O Bee 1/26111) 03/08/10 Dee :::23/10 GJi29i1,:; , BCC 3/23/10 05/17/10 Bee 4/26/10 -- --f -c :;I2GiCf "1i;1 'Ji ---- -~-, -j-- 1=- + f-- -I - I i 'I Recreation & ()pen ;)/Nlei.' Element $43,249 I 535.96! i $18,060 I $89.566 $79210 'S18,663 '537,171 ;Z6,uJ6 $18,668 S289,400 $18,668 $11,400 S1J5,OOO $30,000 $32,500 $11,400 $103,522,453 S:';'::jCI] --f--- -- $1:,34"; 31::; 34:"' 3'5342 3!-5342 3 ~ -5 3..12 $'6r5 $!6rS :S~6 J ~') $!5 T7':, $936~ Jill) Y' $10 JeG Location of Conservation Collier Program Lands - 2010 !c~ra<::araPralriepitll.erve' , - ---- ---- .. II ipepperRanC~Pre"erve; -- '- :L'mp_~I~_~~~h Pre..e~~ ~aTlhead:'_~~b p~~s!rve\~ 1~1!~~?ii:~~~p-P~6~~~~ :~nt-iieT'k~'0'~serve] -~;;;: '~ .. ') II 1w.'WOod, ",..,,;;, ,- - ->r /\\. 1-'J'~~~rese7!J I .'.... - \ J m ~ t--- W1~c-heliierHe~1 1; I. , ~----.. ~~r . ", .!I"r ~~!fllR03dPreser""'i IC-amE: KealsStran-~ Project] I------------~ I /, ~ ~ohatc_hiie-cmk Preserve ." lL.,ga~~Ods:~~e!l8~~~ I,~edom Pal1l:[=--'--=-- =,"",-"-_.j ~ i "-, ,J.;. :Naiicy_ paytofi:"rii$erv~J ~ //: I. i , ~f]' l{ ;~i j--G"OrdOli Rlv~- LG;,!!nWBY~9-.!~ I !. ish~iil~~~nd pre~rv~-f=-=':'~'-~' --'-':~J )~il~~:~Nii-~roject ',p..., // do, - - - - Acquisition Status Conservation Collier ACqll!'~iid",/ Other Agency Conservation ~d'~!;r J",",,,,",,,,p~"N,1 ""'"'~-":I ---,-- ...-,:j.'.". .. "'"" ':',- '_ .......c__'<:{'. Lake Trafford ,'.,'" ' - - '"' ',.,,,....,.. ,,' \ Mitigation I Conservation Easement 'ib "". " .--.J 10 Miles www,CollierGov.nefJConservationGo!lier o Data Source:Parcels - GoRier County Property Appraiser Created By: Facmties Management! Conservation Collierl A. Sulecki G:\Conservation CollierlmapslAcquired properties\ Acquired&Approve(LMap_August2010.mxd and .jpg January 28, 2010. .-, ,I L i \v--.__J ciifie! County .._.._._-"-~~,-" "....,~--_._._,,-_.~ 22 Recreation & Open Space Element :P ~ ~ - 'f) .::'".! ::;;c :: ('j oen ,j) ..,. ;1.; X ~ 0 I:: 0" g~ ~ " E '" ..< o P" ".". ,1 , "." ,~ ".; -. '0 ~ '" ~ " '" ~ Ul ~ " ! U ~<{ !Jl!..D 0" wen W.f - ~ '" " >< o 0 '01 Q. " "- Ir<( ;: " ~ " Ul '" ~ o U " "0 'n 1: ;:j :.) " 4: 2-<.0 ="" -0 "E :< o 0 .t:: 0.. ~ "- f- <i ," '" '" -' f ~ :loci ~ co ~" 0", ~~ ~ ~ ;J) '~ :i~ :>,':::" :...;<:( '" 1] " '" ;; cr ~ a; -' ~ u :?2<e ~~ - 'D '" " "", o \"'1 ;: >< '" ~ Z ~ :; ~ 'E <! " !l. '" "f' lfa .II\" '" ~ '" !l. " -; i/J 'l5 ~ . " ~~ "'''' !l.'" ~ Ul " X 012 "'''- .- ::l. ~<( o ~ Qi o .- <ii ~ ~ o '" :..L.. ~ <ll '~ 1;;<( in ~ '0'" e..... ~ 1'-. ~ - " lfJ x o 'l) ~ ;:: .:l. ...., .:l. >"<( '" 'J Ul " u ~<( ccn o "' "- '" 7Uo Zen >-,( ~ 2 ~.~ "<( '" o o (I: to '" :l. '" ~ ~ (;j u iii<( ~~ o ,;".j e ....." ~ x i) e (f) "- ..;. c. ~<( o u , -, I I I I , I I I ~ '" " ;; a: " := :!:! ~ ~ - ;;; u ,,<( 0.,. ;;"") "0 Z.,.; Ul"" '0 . :: ~ ro t: ~~ -g<l: " '" " o .l: f0- e " fo- SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 20] ] EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Conservation and Coastal Management Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below. Goal: General statement that defines what the Element will ultimately achieve. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s). Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s). Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and 6'Tammatical changes. Objective 1.1: Policy 1.1.3: Policy 1.1.6: Objective 1.2: Policy 1.2.3: Policy 1.2.5: Policy 1.3.1: Policy 1.3.4: Objective 2.1: Revise to reflect Program has been implemented and activities are ongoing Revise per EAC to address financial feasibility Revise to include an effective date Revise per the EAC to address database provisions Modify to require that only watershed dependent data should be organized by watershed and sub-basin units; and revise per CCPC to include specific text Delete per staff as Policy is no longer relevant Revise per EAC to include correct acronyms Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant Modify to reflect completed work and reword first sentence in item (c); and revise per EAC to add requirement that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the same drainage area 1 CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 2.1.3: Policy 2.1.6: Policy 1.3.1: Policy 1.3.4: Objective 2.1: Policy 2.1.3: Policy 2.1.6: Objective 2.2: Policy 2.2.1: Policy 2.2.2: Policy 2.2.5: Objective 2.3: Objective 2.5: Policy 2.5.1: Policy 2.5.2: Revise per EAC to include within the Policy measurement tools for determining improvements to the watersheds over time Revise per EAC to include within the Policy the use of watershed management plans for ongoing data collection guidance Revise to reflect most current acronym references per EAC Delete, as Policy is no longer relevant Revise to rcquirc that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the same drainage area per EAC Revisc to include requirement for measurement tools for determining improvements to the watersheds over time per EAC Revise to require the use of watershed management plans for ongoing data collection guidance per EAC Modify to add qualifier, such as '"to attain the highest water quality practical" per staff; retain Objective text as written per CCPC; and retain Objective text as written per SFWMD Revise to include provision to encourage wastewater re-use for irrigation per EAC Revise to include establishment and implementation of a fertilizer ordinance to limit nitrogen and phosphorus use per EAC Revise to include benchmarks for Policy achievement per EAC Revise to include coordination and Plan development with the FDEP per staff; and retain Objective text as written per CCPC Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC 2 CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 2.53: Objective 3.1: Policy 3.1.1: Objective 3.3: Policy 3.4.1: Policy 3.4.4: Policy 4.1.2: Policy 4.1.3: Policy 6.1.1: Policy 6.1.2: Policy 6.2.1: Delete, as estuarine management program has been implemented per staff; and, revise to reflect initial implementation and ongoing maintenance per CCPC and EAC Revise to reflect establishment of the monitoring network, addition of phrase, "to ensure highest water quality practical," and reference that groundwater monitoring activities are ongoing per staff; and, retain Objective text as written per CCPC Revise to address improvement of groundwater monitoring III order to assess saltwater intrusion per EAC Revise to add provision for staff assessment within a specific Immokalee wellfield extending under the airport and adjoining industrial lands per EAC Revise to add reference to salinity trending within Policy per EAC Revise to add provision for coordination with the SFWMD and Big Cypress Basin per EAC Revise to indicate that the County, in coordination with the SFWMD shall be responsible for devising a method to determine agricultural pumpage Revise to indicate County Department responsible for compiling water use requirements of the native plant and animal community associations within the County Modify to reference the June 2010 Land Development Code amendments that implement specific subsections of this Policy, address scrivener's errors in subsections 6.1.1 (7 & 13) and revise applicable subsections, delete subsection 6.1.1 (7), and add an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation per staff; revise to clearly reflect intent per CCPC; and, revise to clearly reflect intent per EAC Revise to include reference to the June 2010 Land Development Code amendments that implement specific subsections of the Policy, and include an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation purposes per staff; revise to clearly reflect intent per CCPC; and, revise to clearly reflect intent per EAC Revise to correct the Florida Administrative Code reference; and insert reference to the current SFWMD land use and land cover inventory 3 CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Objective 6.2: Policy 6.2.3: Policy 6.2.5: Policy 6.2.7: Policy 6.3.2: Policy 6.3.3: Policy 7.1.2: Policy 7.1.6: Objective 7.2: Policy 7.2.2: Revise to require mitigation within the same drainage area as initial impact per EAC Revise provision (6) to include that watershed management plans contain designated areas to be protected from development so as to preserve habitat, water flows, recharge areas and to prevent future flooding per EAC Delete Section 6.2.5 (6)(5)(b)(3), as the specific criteria to identify mitigation priorities and implement the inccntive program have been adopted into the Land development Code, and address native vegetation retention standards for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System as part of the Immokalee Area Master Plan amendments per staff; and revise to clarify native vegetation requirements for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System per CCPC; and revise to clarify native vegetation requirements for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System and provide cross rcferences to other Elements per EAC Rcvise to require wctland mitigation within impacted watershed per EAC Revise to reflcct maintenance dredging permit requirement and include within the CCME additional policies to protect sea grasses from dredging activities per the EAC Delete, as the new FWC Rule Change prohibits speed zones to be established based on benthic resources per staff; retain Policy as written per CCPC: and, retain Policy as written per EAC Delete references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy, revise to add a general rcferencc to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance, and delete the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such mitigation is required by the FFWCC or USFWS per staff; and revisc to add provision for retention of old growth slash pines for RCW ncsting habitat per EAC Delete, as the Land Development Code amendmcnt to implement this Policy has been completed per staff; and, revise to reflect the continuance of Policy Objective per CCPC Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on manatee deaths in Collier County waters Delcte specific refcrencc to Policy 6.3.3, as reference is no longer relevant pcr staff; and revise Policy to retain reference to Policy 6.3.3 per EAC " CCME SUMMARY OF RECUMMENDED CHANGES Objective 7.3: Policy 7.3.1 Policy 7.4.1 Policy 9.1.6 Policy 9.1. 7 Policy 9.2.3 Policy 9.4.3 Policy 10.1.1: Policy 10.1.5 Policy 10.1.6 Policy 10.2.1 Objective 10.3: Objective 10.4: Policy 10.4.13 Policy 10.6.2 Objective 12.1 Policy 12.1.3 Revise to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on sea turtle disorientation Revise to reflect the correct Policy reference Modif'y Policy to refer to other funding opportunities Revise to reflect the establishment of a training program Revise to reflect current departmental reference Modif'y to reflect the establishment, and maintenance, of a cooperative agreement Modif'y to remove redundant sentence Revise Policy or add policies to include strategies to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts Modif'y to consistently refer to "marine" wetlands per staff; revise to clarify "marine wetlands" per CCPC; and revise to define or clarif'y "marine wetlands" per EAC Modify to require that destruction of any marine wetlands requires a fiscal analysis Modif'y to require beach access sites shown on plans to be at the discretion of the County Revise to include LDC map reference per EAC Revise Objective to read, ".. . continue to be restored and then maintained per EAC Modif'y the Policy to change its focus to educating the public about sea level rise Delete, as existing regulations are adequate to address sea level rise per staff; retain Policy as written per the CCPC; and retain Policy as written per the EAC Modif'y to address legislative changes to hurricane evacuations requirements Modif'y to reflect shelter space figures that are consistent with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study Update 5 CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 12.1.5 Policy 12.1.7: Policy 12.1.9 Policy 12.1.11 Policy 12.1.12 Policy 12.1.13 Policy 12.1.14 Policy 12.1.1 5 Policy 12.1.17 Policy 12.1.21 Policy 12.2.5 Policy 12.3.2 Objective 12.4 ModifY to reflect updated equipment listing requirements for onsite shelters Revise to add requirement to coordinate with the municipalities per CCPC Revise to rcflect correct terminology and coordination activities Revise to reflect latest date of document Revise to reflect latest date of document ModifY to reference funding limitations Delete, as the inclusion of hurricane shelters within the 5-year schedule of Capital Improvements is not supported Modify to make Policy references consistent with State and Federal guidelines; and, revise to reflect latest date of document Revise sentence for clarity Revise to reflect the next due date for the Plan update Modify to provide new CHHA definition Revise for clarification and sentence structure Revise to reflect current terminology and departmental names 6 CCME SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of the Successes and Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Conservation and Coastal Management Element A. Background and Introduction The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growfh Management Plan provides the County the guidance to: manage coastal systems and historic resources, and maintain shoreline lands and infrastructure so as to enhance environmental, recreational, and economic opportunities and protect human life; protect, conserve and manage natural systems, and vegetative and land resources; and, where appropriate, enhance air and water quality. The Conservation and Coastal Management Element includes thirteen (13) Goals and associated objectives and policies. These Goals are summarized as follows: I. Protection of natural resources; 2. Protection of surface and estuarine water resources; 3. Protection of groundwater resources; 4. Protection of freshwater resources; 5. Protection of mineral and soil resources; 6. Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat; 7. Protection of fisheries and wildlife; 8. Maintenance of existing air quality; 9. Management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes; 10. Protection of coastal resources; II. Protection of historic resources; 12. Hurricane evacuation and sheltering; and, 13. Avoiding duplication of regulations During the reporting period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report, the County has been successful in furthering the Element's overall purposes of: protecting and conserving natural resources; protecting human life and property along the coast; and, protecting and managing watersheds and estuarine areas. The County has implemented and maintained various programs and regulatory controls that have been instrumental in protecting and conserving wetlands, listed species habitat and other areas appropriate for protection; these include, but are not limited to: (I) The Stewardship Program in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay; (2) The Transfer of Development Rights Program in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District; (3) The Conservation Collier land acquisition prob'Tam; and (4) Regulatory controls within the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Land Development Code. Additionally, the County continues to maintain timely hurricane evacuation and sheltering practices; constructed the new James V. Mudd Emergency Services Center with state of the art equipment; maintains water quality and monitoring programs; continues the development of watershed management plans; continues periodic beach renourishment and dredging projects; and, continues to monitor sea turtle nesting. I CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Preparation of this Section of the Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR) involved coordination between Comprehensive Planning staff and the following departments/sections: Land Development Services Department - Zoning Services Section, Storm water and Environmental Planning Section, Engineering Services Section; Public Utilities Engineering and Water Departments; Pollution Control Department; Parks and Recreation Department; Coastal Zone Management Department; Facilities Department - Conservation Collier; and the Bureau of Emergency Services. Changes are proposed to the following Objectives and Policics. B. Objective Analysis OBJECTIVE 1.1: Collier County will continue to develop and implement a comprehensive environmental management and conservation program, which will ensure that the natural resources, including State and Federally listed animal species, of Collier County are properly, appropriately, and effectively identified, managed, and protected. Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County continues to opcrate the program described in this Objective. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect that the program is ongoing. Policv Relevance: Policy 1.1.3: Collier County shall continue to support established environmental policies by maintaining an appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of developing, administering, and providing long-term direction for the protection and management of the County's environmental resources. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The County continues to support established environmental policies by maintaining an appropriately administered and professionally staffed governmental unit capable of developing, administering, and providing long-term direction for the protection and management of the County's environmental resources. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment fi-om the AUf!ust 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting that the financial feasibility of achieving the Policy objectives with limited staff resources be evaluated/ {Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s- SlaffComment- No change to this Policy is recommended. Staff believes that current staffing levels are adequate to fulfill the Policy objectives, and adjustments have been made over time in response to changes in workload.} Policy 1.1.6: In those areas of Collier County where oil extraction and related processing is an allowable use, such use is subject to applicable state and federal oil and gas permits and Collier County non-environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional-drilling andlor previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native 2 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C-25 through 62C.30, F.A.C., as those rules exist on the effective date of this amendment to the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C-30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal andlor state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C. even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All access roads to oil and gas uses shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C-30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy I. 1.6 outlines the environmental review criteria for oil extraction and related processing, where oil extraction and related processing is an allowable use in the COlmty. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include the effective date of the amendment. OBJECTIVE 1.2: Maintain the framework for an integrated, computer-based environmental resources data storage, analysis, and graphics system and annually update the databases based on previous year's analytical data in order to monitor the status of the County's natural resources and propose potential protection measures when appropriate. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The Collier County Environmental Planning Section maintains a robust, GIS-based system (ESRI's ArcGIS) that will be updated annually. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Azwust II. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that the Objective address/include provisions for quality of data, analysis of data, and availability of data; and, the Environmental Planning Section maintain copies of, and an index to, analyses performed on these GIS-based data.] {Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and AdOlJiion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to this Policy is recommended. The computer-based environmental resources data is stored with the Division's GIS data. This makes the data most available to other county staff. Data quality details are stored as metadatafiles when they are provided by the data source. Published GIS data are required to include metadata files. Almost all county data are public records and available, there is no need for the environmental planning section to maintain copies. A log of environmental analysis will be started and stored with the environmental GIS data.] 3 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy Relevance Policy 1.2.3: Collected andlor compiled data will be organized by established water-shed and sub-basin units. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Most of this data is in GIS format, so thcre is no need or benefit to organize it by watershed. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to require watershed dependent data only be organized by watcrshed and sub-basin units. (Environmental Advisorv Council (E-"'AC) Comment from the Auzust 11. 2010 Workshop - Suggesting that text be added to the Policy that ensures data quality.) {Planninz Commission Comment from the Auzust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the Policy be revised to read, "Non GIS-based data collected will be organized by established watershed and sub-basin units. "} (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdOiJ/ion Hearinzs - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the CCPC recommendation that the Policy be revised for clarity. However, stall does not concur with the E4C's recommendation. as "data quality" is addressed in preceding Policies.) Policy 1.2.5 Collier County's computerized environmental resources data storage, analysis and graphics system shall share information and resources with other Federal, State, Regional, local and private environmental management agencies and organizations and the general public. The County shall cooperate with these other entities when updating its system in order that the benefits of the updated system may be shared with all appropriate agencies and organizations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Provisions for working cooperatively with other agencies and sharing data with the public are in the preceding policies. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted. OBJECTIVE 1.3: Pursuant to Administration Commission Final Order AC-99-002 dated June 22, 1999, the County has completed the phased delineation, data gathering, management guidelines and implementation of the Natural Resources Protection Area (NRPA) program as part of the required Collier County Rural and Agricultural Assessment. Through this Assessment, the County has determined that the NRPA program is not the only mechanism to protect significant environmental systems. Accordingly, within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay in the Future Land Use Element, the County has delineated Stewardship Sending Areas that will function to protect large environmental systems. Pursuant to the following policies, the County shall protect identified environmental systems through the NRPA and Rural Lands Stewardship programs. ./ CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be rewritten for clarity (i.e. formatting). Policv Relevance: Policy 1.3.1: The purpose of the NRPA program is to direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The program will include the following: a. Identification of the NRPAs in map form as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map; During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area, the County has determined that CREW Trust lands, Belle Meade, a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be identified as NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate Estates is a NPRA. The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the Future land Use Map. b. A process for verifying the existence and boundaries of NRPAs during development permit applications; c. Guidelines and standards for development of NRPAs including conservation guidelines to protect natural resource values, to maintain ecologically functioning systems, and to restore or mitigate NRPAs already degraded. Allowable land uses, vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species protection criteria for the NRPAs are those contained in the NRPA Overlay within the Future Land Use Element. d. A review process, integrated into the normal development application review, to ensure that the guidelines and standards are being met; e. A program to defer development of NRPAs. First consideration should be fee simple purchase (based on public referenda approving and funding purchases). Other options should include, but not be limited to, tax incentives and transfer of development rights; f. A program to pursue Delegation of Authority Agreements with State and Federal Permitting agencies for local regulation of activities that may alter the biological and physical characteristics of NRPAs; g. The County shall seek assistance from and support State (e.g. CARL, SOR) or Federal land acquisition programs for County areas qualifying as NRPAs. Policy Achievement Analysis: The County established Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs) to direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The Policy also provides information regarding the relationship of the NRP As to the Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment. Finally, the Policy requires the County to seek assistive from, and support, state and/or federal land acquisition programs for areas qualifYing as NRP As; Conservation Collier identifies nominated properties within Federal and State acquisition areas and coordinates with the agencies to make them aware of willing sellers within their acquisition areas. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUl?/Jst II, 2010 Workshov - Suggesting to delete the acronym "CARL" and insert "Florida Forever"; and spell-out the acronym, "SOR" _ Save Our Rivers.] 5 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDtion Hearinzs - Staff Comment - Staff generally agrees with the EAC's recommendation, and suggests that the Policy he revised to read, "The County shall seek assistance from, and support, State and/or Federal land acquisition programs for County areas qualifYing as NRP As. 'J Policy 1.3.4: Guided by the Technical Advisory Committee, designate and adopt management guidelines and performance standards for County natural resource protection areas. Implementation shall occur on an annual basis as NRPAs and their implementation criteria are developed. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Policy objectives have been achieved as part of the Growth Management Plan amendments to satisfy the Final Ordcr. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted. OBJECTIVE 2.1: By January 2008, the County shall complete the prioritization and begin the process of preparing Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The process shall consist of (1) an evaluation of areas for which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on current or past watershed management planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available data and information that can be used in the development of Watershed Management Plans, and (3) budget authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed Management Plan by January 2008. A funding schedule shall be established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by 2010. In selecting the order of Plan completion, the County shall give priority to watersheds where the development growth potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of wetland and listed species habitats. The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the Federal and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the following as interim standards for development: a. All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District (February 2006) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable offsite discharge rates required by Drainage Sub-element Policy 6.2 and 6.3, respectively; b. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland. c. Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of November 17, 2005. Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheetflow conditions. d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to determine impacts to natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs. For this particular evaluation, natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified as contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet facultative plant species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the natural wetland, flowway, or slough at least one (1) foot lower than the ground at the edge of the natural 6 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT wetland, f1owway, or slough. The edge of the natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be identified by field determination and based upon vegetation and elevation differences from the adjacent uplands or transitional wetlands. The County shall require the applicant to avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or, when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 2001-27, adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and provided basin delineations where special peak discharge rates have been established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings of the Watershed Management Plans. e. All new development and re-development projects shall ensure surrounding properties will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on stormwater sheet flow. f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all development projects to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental permits. g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future development or re-development projects. Best Management Practices means structural and non- structural facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution either through source control or treatment of stormwater. Figure 1. Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.1.d is Applicable [See Figure 1 following CCME text] Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County is currently involved in the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The County completed the initial delineation and prioritization of the watersheds by the end of November 2007. Dedicated funding for development of the Watershed Management Plans was also obtained and set aside in 2007. The County coordinated with the Florida Department of Emergency Management coastal Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) aerial topographic mapping effort to obtain more detailed and expanded coverage of the County. The County also coordinated with the South Florida Water Management District to utilize their existing two-dimensional regional hydrologic and hydraulic model for southwest Florida as a starting tool in the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The County utilized the various policies undcr CCME Objectivc 2.1 to form the basis for the Scope of Services and then hired a consultant team to prepare the Watershed Management Plans. The work is in progress and is scheduled for completion by the end of 20 10. This Objective remains relevant and should bc retained. However, the Objective should be modified to reflect completed work, and the first sentence in (c) reworded as follows, "Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated Special Flood Hazard Area (flood zones starting with the letter "V" or "A") as depicted on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency." {Public Comment (Community Meetinl! held on 3/15/10): Public stated that the County has not developed a county-wide stormwater plan.] {Public Comment (Community Meetinl! held on 3/15/10): Public stated that all development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated afier each watershed and its characteristics are developed.] 7 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUl!Ust 11. 2010 Work~hov ~ Suggesting to add in section b. of the Objective, a requirement that compensation for all wetland impacts occur within the same drainage area} (Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change is recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will be addressed as part of'the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.) Policv Relevance Policy 2.1.3: The Plans will also evaluate structural and non-structural controls for restoring historical hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where possible and for reducing the impacts of canal and stormwater discharges to estuaries. Policy Achievement Analvsis: The Scopc of Services for development of the Watershed Management Plans includes this policy's featurcs. The Policy remains relevant and should bc retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (t/4C) Comment from the AUf!ust 11. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting that measurement tools be added to the Policy so as to determine improvements to the watersheds over time.) {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment fi-om the November 3. 2010 AdoTJfion Hearinf! ~ Suggesting that the EAC commentfrom August 11. 2010 be revised to read. "measurement tools be added to the PoliLyfor determining improvements to the watersheds over time. 'J {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdOTJfion Hearinzs - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy is recommended at this time. The Watershed Management Plans include performance measures, and the need for future evaluation of improvements will be addressed when Plans are adopted.] Policy 2.1.6: Until the completion and adoption of individual watershed management plans, promote water management permitting on a basin by basin approach. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Water management permitting is regulated by the South Florida Water Management District. The Policy is not relevant and should be deleted, as water management permitting is regulated by the SFWMD. {Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!ust1I, 2010 Workshov - Suggesting that data shortfalls be addressed.] {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment (i'om the November 3. 2010 Adovtion Hearinz ~ Suggesting that EAC comment from August 11. 2010 be revised to read, "use watershed management plans for ongoing data collection guidance. "] Ii CONSERVATJON AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdoPtion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - No change to the Policy is recommended at this time, as the Watershed Management Plans will identifY data needs.] Policy 2.1.7: Collier County shall take the lead and promote intergovernmental coordination between the County and other governmental agencies involved with watershed planning, including, but not necessarily limited to, the municipalities of Marco Island, Naples and Everglades City, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other governmental agencies. The County will take the lead and oversee the preparation of the necessary watershed management plans, and will rely upon the work performed or data collected by other agencies, to the extent that these agencies have data and/or experience, which may be useful within the watershed basin planning and management process. Policy Achievement Analvsis: This Policy describes the Scope of Services for the development of the Watershed Management Plans. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to reflect work completed and that the listed activities are on-going. OBJECTIVE 2.2: All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable Federal, State, or local water quality standards. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective has not been met, because there are several water bodies in Collier County that do not meet Federal or State water quality standards. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency have finalized the list of those water bodies that do not meet water quality standards, and in 2008 FDEP developed Total Maximum Daily Loads for these water bodies. The Watershed Management Plans being developed by Collier County will address these water bodies. Water quality improvement initiatives have been taken within Collier County to address some water quality issues. A new water quality treatment system referred to as Freedom Park has been constructed to treat the water within the Gordon River. In addition the Lake Trafford dredging project, which is currently ongoing, has been removing the muck on the bottom of the lake in order to improve the lake's water quality and prevent future fish kills. Collier County Pollution Control continues to implement numerous proactive programs designed to protect the County's surface water quality from man-made pollution sources. However, due to natural conditions impacting the water quality found in Collier County, some federal and state water quality conditions may not be achievable. Therefore, Collier County will continue to takc all necessary actions to maintain the highest attainable level of surface water quality within its watersheds. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be reworded similar to Goal 3 to read, "to attain the highest water quality practical." {Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!Ust 11, 2010 Workshop - Suggesting staff examine the use of filter ponds to improve water quality of canals.] 9 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (Planninfl Commission Comment from the AUf!.ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting thatthe Objective be retained as written.) [Recommendation from the October 14.2010 South Florida Water Manaflement District Comments to the Devartment of Communi tv Affairs on the Provosed EAR - Suggesting that the Objective be retained as written.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinfls - Staff Comment- Staff concurs with the stated recommendations that the Objective should be retained as written.) Policv Relevance: Policy 2.2.1: Wastewater treatment plants shall not be allowed to discharge directly to rivers, canals or jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 2.2.1 bans wastewater treatment plants from discharging directly into rivers, canals or jurisdictional wctlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives, and Policies of this Element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUflust11, 2010 Workshov - Sugg;sting to insert the phrase, "encourage wastewater re-usefor irrigation" within the Policy.) (Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adoption Hearinfls - Staff Comment - Staff recommends retaining the Policy as written, as the reference to "re-use" is not applicable to this Policy. Further, staff suggests an additional Policy be added within the CCME to address the EAC's recommendation, if Board directed] Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 2.2.2: In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run-off, stormwater systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity and quality of fresh water to the estuarine system. Non-structural methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 2.2.2 limits the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run-off. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to delete the word "in" and with the word "into" in the last sentence. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!UstII. 2010 Workshov - Suggesting staff limit nitrogen and phosphorous use through afertilizer ordinance, so these nutrients become less 10 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT likely to reach waterways (seasonal uses, granular forms, no application near storm drains or water retention/flow areas). Also, limit application of pesticides in a similar fashion.] {Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdODtion HearinfIs - Staff Comment - The adoption of a fertilizer ordinance is required by Chapter 403.9337, Florida Statutes, and will be part of the Watershed Management Plans.] Policy 2.2.3: Chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme caution. The use of appropriate biological and mechanical (use of harvesting equipment to remove vegetation) controls in both the canal system and stormwater detention ponds is encouraged. Manufacturers and EPA guidelines for chemical use in aquatic habitat will be followed. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 2.2.3 requires that chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme caution and encourages the use of biological and mechanical controls. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUfIust 11, 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting staff develop an ordinance or LDC guidelines for the application of weed control.] {Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdODtion HearinfIs - Staff Comment - Aquatic plant control is necessary to keep the canal systems flow capacity adequate to prevent flooding. Maintenance activities are regulated by State licensing and Federal label requirements. Operational policies will be discussed in the Watershed Management Plans.] Policy 2.2.4: Continue and expand when needed the existing water quality monitoring program for sampling canals and rivers and assess the data annually. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 2.2.4 requires the continuation and expansion of the County's water quality sampling program. Collier County Pollution Control Department (CCPCD) continues monitoring a fixed network of surface water stations throughout the county. The network is evaluated every 3 years to determine the relevancy of the sampling sites. If water quality problems are found that may impact public health, a very intensive study area (VISA) is initiated to determine the source of the water quality problems. The surface water quality data were assessed in 2007 by CCPCD; in 2008 by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under the Impaired Waters Rule Assessment; and will be reassessed in 2010 by CCPCD. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUfIust 11. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting staff use analysis of existing data to drive new data collection.} {Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdODtion HearinfIs - Staff Comment - The Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written.] 11 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 2.2.5: By December 31,2008, and no less than every three years, stormwater management systems shall be inspected and certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for compliance with their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected. Policy Achievcment Analvsis: The deadline for Policy 2.2.5 has not been met, and the County has not identified stormwater management systems that are not currently mecting State water quality treatment standards. The County is developing a process for stormwater management systems, which is expected to be completed by December 2015. This Policy remains relevant and should be retaincd. IIowever, the Policy should be revised to reflect an extended deadline to December 2015; and include a rcquirement to coordinate activities with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and FDEP. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the Au!!ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting to add benchmarks within the Policyfor the achievement of the stated objectives by year 2015.) (Post EAC and CCPC WorhholJs and AdOiJ/ion Hearin!!s - StafrComment - No change to the Policy is recommended at this time. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has been working on an update to the statewide stormwater Rule that includes .Iystem inspections. Ihe County is following the development of this Rule and will wait to review the standards in the Rule prior to adopting a local ordinance.) OBJECTIVE 2.3: All estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state and local water quality standards. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective has not been met. Not all estuarics meet Federal or State water quality standards. The Watershed Management Plans developed by the County will address measures to bring these water bodies into compliance with State and ]Oederal water quality standards. Currently, the County monitors its water quality through the collection and evaluation of ground water and surface water samples. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should bc revised to include the devclopment of a plan, in coordination with the FDEP, to meet applicable federal, state and local water quality standards. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment !i'om AUf!ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that staff consider monitoring locations) (Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 27. 2010 tAR WorksholJ -- Suggesting that the Objective be retained as written.) (Post EAC and ccrc WorhholJs and AdolJtion llearinf!s - Staff Comment- Staff recommends retaining the Objective as written.) 12 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Relevance: Policy 2.3.4: Continue to implement and refine a water quality and sediment monitoring program for the estuarine system. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Department implemented a water quality monitoring program in October of 2008. A water quality monitoring plan was written and approved. The Monitoring Plan follows FDEP's Standard Operating Procedures and the Pollution Control Department's Lab Procedures. Water quality sampling has been conducted in Cocohatchee Estuary for over a year; a draft report of the data has been written. Also, water quality sampling started in November of 2009 in Clam Bay. CZM is currently sampling the Cocohatchee and Clam Bay on a monthly basis. Master plans will be developed with stakeholders as data and regulations are developed. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom AUl!ust 11.2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting that staff use the Watershed Management Plan effort to evaluate sampling points. Also, suggesting need for a fertilizer ordinance to reduce discharges of nutrients into waterways.) (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDtion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - Staff recommends retaining the Policy as written. A fertilizer ordinance is required by State statute and will be part of the Watershed Management Plans.) Policy 2.3.6: The County will only allow development activities which will not adversely impact coastal water resources. This is implemented through the following mechanisms: a. Require all applicable Federal and State permits addressing water quality to be submitted to Collier County before Collier County issues a Final Development Order. b. Excluding single family homes, any project impacting 5 acres or more of wetlands must provide a pre and post development water quality analysis to demonstrate no increase in nutrient, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc and copper loading in the post development scenario. c. By January 2008, the County shall undertake an assessment of the current model used to evaluate pre and post development pollutant loadings referenced in (b) of this Policy. At a minimum, the purpose of this assessment will be to verify the accuracy of the model and to provide data evaluating stormwater management structure design. In reviewing the accuracy of the model, the County will include an evaluation of the reduction of lake depths with time and the corresponding loss of retention volume, the impact of lake stratification, and the need for aeration. The assessment will also include the sampling of runoff from undisturbed sites and from permitted stormwater outfalls for the parameters listed in Paragraph (b) of this Policy and pesticides. The results of the assessment and recommendations regarding the pollutant loading analysis, revisions to current model methodology, potential regulatory restrictions, and further monitoring shall be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for further direction. 13 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 2.3.6 requires the County to only allow development activities which will not adversely impact coastal watcr resources. This is to be implemented by 1) requiring applicable Federal and State permits addressing water quality to be submitted to Collier County before Collier County issues a Final Development Order, 2) require projects, excluding single family homes, impacting 5 acres or more of wetlands to provide a pre and post development water quality analysis to demonstrate no increase in nutrient, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc and copper loading in the post development scenario and 3) undertake an assessment of the current model used to evaluate these pre and post development pollutant loadings. Regarding, a pre-development vs. post-dcvelopment analysis for nutrients, BOD, TSS, Pb, Zn, and Cu, LDC section 10.02.02 A.3.a.ii indicates that the analysis shall be performed using "approved methodologies" and only requires the analysis on nutrients. The methodology that has been used by the US Army Corps of Engineers and is being developed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protcction is limited to nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus). The original state storm water regulations were based on a standard of 80 % removal of TSS. Current evaluations of Florida stormwater regulation indicate the design needs to address increasing concentrations of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in surface and ground water. Additionally other significant pollutants are more easily removed than nitrogen or phosphorus (Harpcr, 2007). The draft permitting handbook for the update of the state stormwater rule includes analysis only for nitrogen and phosphorus loadings (FDEP, 2009). In the new model the pre development conditions are now considered to be the conditions reprcsented by the SWFFS Natural Systems Model. (This analysis model is very similar to that proposed in Evaluation of Altemative Stormwater Regulations for Southwest Florida, 2003)." The model proposcd in the new slormwater rule is thc preferred analysis, by staff. The FDEP evaluation of the stormwater rules in preparation of development of the proposed state-wide stormwater rule addressed the issues identificd in section c. Harper (2007) indicates that in wet detention systems, nutrient treatment is primarily through the production of algae. He recommends that only the top 12 feet of un-mixed systems bc considered in the water quality treatment requirement. (Deeper depths are recognized as storage of solids and treatment for other constitucnts.) This is also the recommendation of the "Applicant's Handbook" for the proposed rule. The choice of whether to aerate/mix wet detention systems or not is left to the applicant, but the treatment is only based on the aerated portion. Additionally, the monitoring of solids accumulation to identify when impacts to treatment volume is required annually. FDEP also studied runoff from native vegetative communities (Harper 2009) and reported runoff characteristics for nutrients and metals. Due to the change in emphasis of state regulatory programs limiting the loading analysis to nutrients and the studies that have been produced by FDEP to support the proposed storm water rule, Collier County recommends removing the requirement for TSS, BOD, Pb, Zn, and Cu from the Policy in section b, and deletc section c. Literature: Evaluation of Alternative Stonnwalcr Regulations for Southv.'cst Florida Harvey Harper PhD., P.E., David M. Baker P.E.. Environmental Research & Design. Inc. 20m Evaluation of Curren 1 Stonnwatcr Design Criteria within the State ofFlllrida.llarvey Harper PW)., P.E., David M. Haker P.E.. FDEP 2007 Environmental Resource Permit Stormwatcr Quality. Applicant's Handbook. Draft (July 2009). FOEP" 14 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Runoff Characteristics of Natural Vegetation Communities in Florida Draft Final Report September 2009. Harvey Harper PhD.. P.E. 2009. FDEP OBJECTIVE 2.5: The County will continue with the implementation of its estuarine management program by requiring development to meet its current standards addressing stormwater management, and the protection of seagrass beds, dune and strand, and wetland habitats. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The estuarine management program has been implemented. The development of watershed management plans for the County has been included elsewhere In the CCME. The estuarine management program has been implemented through the following: 1. CCME Policies under Goals 2, 6, 7 and 11 2. LDC Sections 3.03.00 Coastal Zone Management 3.04.00 Protection of Endangered, Threatened, or Listed Species 3.05.01 Vegetation Removal, Protection, and Preservation 5.03.06 Dock Facilities (Protection of seagrass beds) 9.04.06 Variance to the Coastal Construction Setback Line I 0.02.02.A Envirorunental Data Submittal Requirements 10.02.06.1 Vehicle-on-the-Beach Regulations 3. Manatee Protection Plan 4. County water quality monitoring program 5. Artificial reefprograffi 6. Waterways management program The Objective and associated Policies are no longer relevant and should be deleted. {P1annin~ Commission Comment from the Au~ust 27, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the Objective and Policies be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation, and ongoing maintenance of the estuarine management program.] {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the November 3. 2010 Adootion Hearin~- The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC commentfrom the August 27,2010 EAR Workshop.] {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adootion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC and CCPC recommendations that the Objective and Policies should be retained to ensure the continuance of the estuarine management program.] Policv Relevance: Policy 2.5.1: Identify land use activities that have the potential to degrade the estuarine environmental quality. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy is no longer relevant and should be removed (see Objective Achievement Analysis). 15 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT {Planning Commission Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the Policy be retained, but revised to r~flect the initial implementation, and ongoing maintenance, of the estuarine management program.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearings - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the CCPC recommendation.] Policy 2.5.2: This management program shall incorporate information obtained from the various watershed management plans described elsewhere in this Element. Policv Achievement Analysis: Policy is no longer relevant and should be removed (see Objective Achievement Analysis). (Planning Commission Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshov- Suggesting that the Policy be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation. and ongoing maintenance of the estuarine management program.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovrion Hearinl!s -- Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the CCPC recommendation.] Policy 2.5.3: This program shall in part be based on the estuarine data analyses and management recommendations contained in the County's coastal management program's technical reports. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy is no longer relevant and should be removed (see Objective Achievement Analysis). {Planning Commission Comment from the August 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the Policy be retained, but revised to reflect the initial implementation, and ongoing maintenance of the estuarine management program.] / Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion llearinl!s - Staff Comment - Statlconcurs with the CCPC recommendation.] OBJECTIVE 3.1: Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards. Ground water quality shall be monitored in order to determine whether development activities are contributing to the degradation of Collier County's ground water quality. Ground water data and land use activities will be assessed annually to determine long-term trends and whether the County is meeting Federal and State regulatory standards for ground water quality. The County shall require ground water monitoring of land uses in accordance with Chapters 62-520, 62-550 and 62-777 of the Florida Administrative Code. Upon the detection of any ground water degradation determined through the monitoring process, the County will notify the appropriate regulatory agencies. In a coordinated effort with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), or of its own accord, the County shall institute a groundwater monitoring network by 2008, including the comprehensive inventory of monitoring wells, an assessment of monitoring wells previously damaged, and policies to make appropriate well repairs and replacements. 16 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Obiective Achievement Analysis: Collier County continues to implement numerous proactive programs designed to protect the County's ground water quality from man-made pollution sources. However, due to natural conditions impacting the water quality found in Collier County, some federal and state water quality conditions may not be achievable. Suggest Objective be worded similar to goal to "ensure highest water quality practical". A groundwater monitoring network was established by the County's Pollution Control Department in 2006. This monitoring network monitors seventy (70) ground water monitoring wells semiannually; dry and wet season. These wells provide limited monitoring of the following land uses; agriculture, commercial, golf course, park, rural residential, urban residential, utilities and wetland. Groundwater quality is assessed annually and provided to the appropriate regulatory agencies for further investigation of exceedances of State and Federal ground water quality standards. This network of monitoring wells encompasses wells owned by USGS, City of Naples, Collier County Wastewater Department and Collier County Water Department. Any monitoring well repairs or replacements would be done at the owner's discretion. In addition, Section 3.06 of the County's Land Development Code (Ground Water Protection) was developed to protect existing and future wellfields, protect natural aquifer system recharge areas, protect Countywide groundwater resources, and to protect the public health and resources through regulation and establishment of standards for development involving the use, storage, generation, handling, and disposal of quantities of hazardous products and hazardous waste in excess of identified quantities, disposal of sewage and effluent, storm water management, earth mining, petroleum exploration, solid waste, and other related aspects ofland use and development. Since a groundwater monitoring network was established in 2006, suggest Objective 3.1 be revised to replace the second paragraph with "The County shall continue to institute a groundwater monitoring network." This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect the establishment of the monitoring network in 2006; include in first sentence of Objective the phrase, "to ensure highest water quality practical"; and, include a reference that monitoring activities are ongomg. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Au!.!ust II. 2010 WorkshoD - Suggesting that staff follow trends in salinity of various aquifers to determine trending over time.] {Plannin!.! Commission Comment trom the Au!.!ust 27, 2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that the Objective be retained as written, except to include a reference that the monitoring network has been established .} {Post EAC and CCPC WorkshoDs and AdoDtion Hearin!.!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the CCPC recommendation.} Policy Relevance: Policy 3.1.1: Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as follows: 1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones defined as follows: 17 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT a) W-1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield). b) W-2 is the land area between the W-1 boundary line and the ten percent ground water capture zone boundary line (whiCh approximates the two year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). c) W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). d) W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). 2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows: a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones. b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3. c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and hazardous wastes: prohibited in W-1, W-2, W-3. d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary containment in W-1, W-2, W-3. e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W-1. f) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found in 40 CFR part 135. g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use. h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited in W-1 and W-2, conditional use required in W-3 and W-4. i) Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-1 subject to complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low-pressure lateral distribution. j) On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-1, W-2, and W-3 shall meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-10, F.A.C. as the rule existed on August 31,1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring plan. 3. Conditional uses shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and where impacts of the development will be isolated from the Surficial and Intermediate Aquifer. Policv Achievement Analvsis: There is one (I) policy within this Objective. Policy 3.1.1 contains criteria for the identification of wellhead protection areas within thc County's Future Land Use Map Series. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but paragraph 3 should be modified to: clarifY the conditional use reference pertains to those conditional uses required by this policy, as opposed to all conditional uses allowed by the zoning district on a given property within a well field protection area; and, remove or clarify the term "extraordinary circumstances." Additionally, the Policy will be evaluatcd to determinc if it would be more appropriately locatcd in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE). {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment (i'om AUl!ust 11. 2010 Workshov -- Suggest addressing the improvement of ground water monitoring in order to assess saltwater intrusion.) 18 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (Post WorksholJ and AdOlJlion Hearinf!s - Staff Comment - Implementation of the EAC's recommendation will require the monitoring activities to be programmed and funded) OBJECTIVE 3.3: Continue to identify, refine extents of, and map zones of influence and contribution around potable wellfields in order to identify activities that must be regulated to protect ground water quality near wellfields. (Refer to Objective 1.1 in the Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element.) Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy will be evaluated to determine if it would be more appropriately located in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE). (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that staff assess the wellfield in Immokalee that has ala year cone of depression extending under the airport and adjoining industrial zoning.) (Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and AdOlJlion Hearinzs - Staff Comment - Implementation of the EAC's recommendation will require the existing Model be adjusted to accommodate the la-year Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones, as the Model evaluates years 1, 2, 5 and 20 only. (The cost to adjust the Model is unknown at this time.)} OBJECTIVE 3.4 Collect and evaluate data and information designed to monitor the quality of ground water in order to identify the need for additional protection measures. (Refer to Objective 1.3 in the Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element.) Obiective Achievement Analvsis: As noted within Objective 3.1 (above), the County's Pollution Control Department established a groundwater monitoring network that monitors seventy (70) ground water monitoring wells semiannually. These data are assessed annually and submitted to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), where these data are maintained within their DBHYDRO database. The SFWMD DBHYDRO database is located at: http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/pg grp sfwmd era/pg sfwmd era dbhvdrobrowser). Objective 3.4 references Objective 1.3 in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub Element (NGARSE). This statement should reference Objective 3. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect the correct reference in the NGARSE - Objective 3. Policv Relevance: Policy 3.4.1 : Continue the existing water quality monitoring program to provide base-line data, evaluate long-term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effectiveness of the County's ground water protection program. 19 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 3.4.\ requires the County to continue the existing water quality-monitoring program to provide base-line data, evaluate long-term trcnds, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effectiveness of the County's ground water protection program. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUl!ust 11. 2010 WorkshofJ - Suggesting that staff add reference to salinity trending within the Policy.} {Post EAC and CCPC WorkshofJs and Adootion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC '.I' recommendation.} Policy 3.4.4: Gather and use appropriate data to refine and improve the database used in the County's 3-dimensional ground water model. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 3.4.4 recommends that the County gather and use appropriate data to refine and improve the database used in the County's 3-dimensional ground water model. This Policy remains rclevant and should be retained. Howcvcr, the Policy will be evaluated to determine if it should be deleted from the CCME, as it already appears in the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element (NGARSE). {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUl!ust 11. 2010 WorkshofJ - Suggesting that staff add a provision for coordination with the SFWMD and Big Cypress Basin within the Policy.} {Post EAC and CCPC Worhhoos and AdofJ/ion Hearinl!s Staff Comment -- Stajf concurs with the EAC's recommendation.} OBJECTIVE 4.1: Collect and evaluate data and information designed to more accurately determine water use in Collier County such as the County's database tracking all permitted wells and wells having consumptive use permits. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only: no change is proposed] Policv Rclevance: Policy 4.1.2: Work with the agricultural community to devise a method for determining agricultural pumpage. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to indicate that the County, in coordination with the South Florida Water Management District, will devise a method for determining agricultural pumpage. 20 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!ust II. 2010 WorkshotJ - Suggesting that staff insert a date for Policy achievement, assign department and add a requirement to coordinate with SFWMD.) (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshotJs and AdotJtion Hearinrzs -- Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC's recommendation.) OBJECTIVE 5.3: The Collier County Engineering Services Department shall periodically assess the types, quantities and location of minable mineral resources in Collier County. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect the current departmental reference. Policv Relevance: Policy 5.3.1: The Collier County Engineering Services Department shall work with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Geological Survey and local mining industry officials to inventory and assess the existing mineral reserves in Collier County. The inventory and assessment will incorporate use of a GIS-based database of all areas within the County that are permitted, either by right, or through a conditional use permit, to conduct mineral extraction operations as well as the volume of fill that is permitted to be removed for each such active mineral extraction operation. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 5.3.1 recommends that the County work with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Geological Survey and local mining industry officials to inventory and evaluate the existing mineral reserves in Collier County. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect the current departmental reference. OBJECTIVE 6.1: The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measurable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and AgriculturaURural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the 21 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT ACSC requirements, this policy shall apply to all non-agricultural development except for single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. Coastal Hiah Hazard Area Non-Coastal Hiah Hazard Area Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres. 10% Residential and Mixed Equal to or greater Equal to or greater than 5 Use Development than 2.5 acres 25% acres and less than 20 acres. 15% Equal to or greater than 20 ac. 25% - ~- Golf Course 35% 35% Commercial and Less than 5 acres. 10% Less than 5 acres. 10% Industrial Development Equal to or greater Equal to or than 5 acres. 15% greater than 5 acres. 15% Industrial I I Development (Rural- 50%, not to exceed 25% of ~%, not to exceed 25% of the Industrial District only) the project site. project site. - ._~_.._-~. ..-.-.--- - The following standards and criteria shall apply to the vegetation retention requirements referenced above. (1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defined as a vegetative community having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are calculated based on the amount of "native vegetation" that conforms to this definition. (2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under-story and ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection to offsite preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to provide for a core area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the interface between the preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts from other land uses. Criteria for determining the dimensional standards of the preserve are to be set out in the Land Development Code. (3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall be set aside as preserve areas. On-site and off-site preserve areas shall be protected by a permanent conservation mechanism to prohibit further development, consistent with the requirements of this policy. The type of permanent conservation mechanism, including conservation easements, required for a speCific development may vary based on preserve area size, type of development approval, and other factors, as set forth in the County's land development regulations. 11 CONSERVATION AND COAS7~4L M4NAGEMENT ELEMENT (4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following criteria in descending order of priority: a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement through the site, consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 ofthis element b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks. c. Onsite wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM, unless permitted for impact pursuant to Policy 6.2.4 of this Element. WRAP means South Florida Water Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedures as described in Technical Publication Reg 001 (September 1997, as updated August 1999). UMAM means Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method as described in Chapter 62-345, F.A.C. d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area as identified in Paragraph (4)c. above, e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and f. All other native habitats. (5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to: a. Passive recreational uses that do not impact the minimum required vegetation or cause a loss of function to the preserve area. Loss of function to the preserve area includes a reduction or a change in vegetation within the preserve and harming any listed species present in the preserve. More specific standards that implement this policy shall be set forth in the land development regulations and will address various types of construction that are compatible with the function of the preserve. The land development regulations will also provide criteria to define appropriate passive recreational uses. The criteria will be established to allow for passive recreational uses such as trails or boardwalks that provide for access within the preserves, providing the uses do not reduce the minimum required vegetation or cause harm to listed species. b. Receipt of treated stormwater discharge where such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts the naturally occurring, native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and the harm to any listed species according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1, as determined by criteria set forth in land development regulations. Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 62-302. F.A.C. and will conform to the water quality criteria requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District (6) A management plan shall be submitted for preserve areas identified by specific criteria in the land development regulations to identify actions that must be taken to ensure that the preserved areas will maintain natural diversity and will function as proposed. The plan shall include methods to address control and treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, stormwater management (if applicable), and maintenance of permitted facilities. If applicable, a listed species monitoring program shall be submitted pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2) (i). State and federal management plans consistent with the requirements of the LDC will be accepted. (7) Until the land development regulations addressed in Policy 6.1.1 (11) are developed, exceptions, by means of mitigation in the form of increased landscape requirements shall be granted for parcels that cannot reasonably accommodate both the preservation area and the proposed activity. Criteria for allowing these exceptions include: (a) Where site elevations or conditions requires placement of fill thereby harming or reducing the survivability of the native vegetation in its existing locations; 23 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (b) Where the existing vegetation required by this policy is located where proposed site improvements are to be located and such improvements cannot be relocated as to protect the existing native vegetation; (c) Where native preservation requirements are not accommodated, the landscape plan shall re-create a native plant community in all three strata (ground covers, shrubs and trees), utilizing larger plant materials so as to more quickly re-create the lost nature vegetation. (8) Parcels that were legally cleared of native vegetation prior to January 1989 shall be exempt from this requirement. (9) Should the amount of wetland vegetation exceed the minimum vegetation requirements as specified herein, retention of wetland vegetation having significant habitat or hydrologic value is encouraged. Increased preservation shall be fostered thro incentives including, but not limited to: clustered development, reduced developn standards such as open space, setbacks, and landscape buffers, to allow for increased areas of preserved wetland vegetation. Significant habitat or hydrologic value is determined by wetland function, not the size of the wetland. (10) Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property owner may submit a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation retention requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4) than the land being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an acceptable land acquisition program, as required by the land development regulations. The monetary payment shall be used to purchase and manage native vegetative communities off-site. The land development regulations shall provide criteria to detennine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon the following provisions: a. The amount, type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site; b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site; c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency technical assistance; d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing; e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the preserve can remain functional; and f. Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area. The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the monetary value, land donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure that native vegetative communities not preserved on-site will be preserved and appropriately managed off-site. (11) Right of Way acquisitions by any governmental entity for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area, shall be exempt from mitigation requirements. (12) Although the primary intent of this Policy is to retain and protect existing native vegetation, there are situations where the application of the retention requirements of this Policy is not possible. In these cases, creation or restoration of vegetation to satisfy all or a portion of the native vegetation retention requirements may be allowed. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to detennine the circumstances for when creation or restoration is allowed and to specify criteria for creation and restoration. (13) The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of this Policy, except for the Native Vegetation Retention Requirements Table, and provisions in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7. Within one year of the effective date of these 24 CONSERI~4nON AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the process for obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a deviation by the appropriate review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of a deviation administratively. The County shall consider the amount and type of native vegetation and the presence of listed species in determining whether the granting of a deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted administratively. The County may grant a deviation if: a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in areas which result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or b. On or off-site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more provisions of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser quality, or c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of other Plan policies that encourage beneficial land uses. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.1.1 specifies that it is applicable to the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, and that native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of a series of preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Futurc Land Use Element shall apply. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to: reevaluate the scrivener's errors in subsections 6.1.1 (7 & 13); delete subsection 6.1.1 (7), since it is already addressed by Policy 6.1.1 (12); and add an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation. {Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUfZust 11, 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that staff insert within (5) b. the word, "acreage" after the phrase "...Ioss of the minimum required vegetation... "] {PlanninfZ Commission (CCPC) Comment from the AUfZust 27, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that the Policy be revised to clearly express the intent that Federal and State parks, preserves andforests shall comply with native vegetative retention requirements, but are not required to have a separate preserve onsite and a preserve management plan.] {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the November 3. 2010 AdOlJ/ion HearinfZ _ The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC comment from the August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop.] {Post EAC and CCPC WorksholJs and AdolJtion HearinfZs - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC and CCPC recommendations.] Policy 6.1.2: For the County's Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria: Preservation and Native Vegetation Retention Standards: a. Receiving Lands: 25 CONSERVATJON AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT A minimum of 40% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 25% of the total site area shall be preserved. b. Neutral Lands: A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area shall be preserved, except that, for Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, located in the North Belle Meade Overlay, a minimum of 70% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 70% of the total site area, shall be preserved. Additionally, for residential development in Section 24, if the dwelling units are not clustered, a minimum of 90% of the slash pine trees present shall be retained. Further restrictions are identified in the North Belle Meade Overlay in the FLUE. [The preceding 2 sentences in italics were adopted 1/25/07 but will NOT be applied or implemented by Collier County. They relate to text in the Future Land Use Element's North Belle Meade Overlay that was found to be "not in compliance" by the Florida Department of Community Affairs in letter dated 5/1107.] c. Non-NRPA Sending Lands: Calculated at the higher value of 80% of the native vegetation present, or as may otherwise be permitted under the Density Rating provisions of the FLUE; d. NRPA Sending Lands: Calculated at the higher value of 90% of the native vegetation present, or as may otherwise be permitted under the Density Blending provisions of the FLUE. e. Provisions a. through d. above shall also be consistent with the wetland protection policies set forth under CCME Objective 6.2. f. In order to ensure reasonable use and to protect the private property rights of owners of smaller parcels of land within lands designated Rural Fringe Mixed Use District on the Future Land Use Map, including nonconforming lots of record which existed on or before June 22, 1999, for lots, parcels or fractional units of land or water equal to or less than five (5) acres in size, native vegetation clearing shall be allowed, at 20% or 25,000 square feet of the lot or parcel or fractional unit, whichever is greater, exclusive of any clearing necessary to provide for a 15-foot wide access drive up to 660 feet in length. For lots and parcels greater than 5 acres but less than 10 acres, up to 20% of the parcel may be cleared. This allowance shall not be considered a maximum clearing allowance where other provisions of this Plan allow for greater clearing amounts. These clearing limitations shall not prohibit the clearing of brush or under-story vegetation within 200 feet of structures in order to minimize wildfire fuel sources. g. Within Receiving and Neutral lands where schools and other public facilities are co- located on a site, the native vegetation retention requirement shall be 30% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 25% of the site. (1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defined as a vegetative community having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are calculated on the amount of "native vegetation" that conforms to this definition. (2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under-story and ground cover, emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection to offsite preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to provide for a core area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the interface between the preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts from other land uses. Criteria for determining the dimensional standards of the preserve are to be set out in the Land Development Code. (3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall be set aside as preserve areas. On-site and off-site preserve areas shall be protected by a permanent conservation mechanism to prohibit further development, consistent with the requirements of this policy. The type of conservation mechanism, including conservation easements, required for a specific development may vary based on preserve area size, type 26 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT ~ of development approval, and other factors, as set forth in the County's land development regulations. (4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following criteria in descending order of priority: a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement of wildlife through the site. This criterion shall be consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element. b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks. c. Onsite wetlands preserved pursuant to Policy 6.2.5 of this Element; d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area, as identified in (4)c. above. e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and 1. All other native habitats. (5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to: a. Passive recreational uses that do not impact the minimum required vegetation or cause a loss of function to the preserve area. Criteria identifying what constitutes a loss of function shall be set forth in the land development regulations and will address various types of construction that are compatible with the function of the preserve. The land development regulations will also provide criteria to define appropriate passive recreational uses. The criteria will be established to allow for passive recreational uses such as trails or boardwalks that provide for access within the preserves, providing the uses do not reduce the minimum required vegetation or cause harm to listed species. b. Receipt of treated stormwater discharge where such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts on the naturally occurring, native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and the harm to any listed species according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1, as determined by criteria set forth in the land development regulations. Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter, 62-302 F.A.C. and will conform to the water quality criteria requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District. (6) A management plan shall be submitted for all preserve areas identified by specific criteria in the land development regulations to identify actions that must be taken to ensure that the preserved areas will function as proposed. The plan shall include methods to address control and treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, stormwater management (if applicable), and maintenance of permitted facilities. If applicable, a listed species monitoring program shall be submitted pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2)(i). (7) Off-site preservation shall be allowed to provide flexibility in the project design. a. Within Receiving and Neutral Lands, off-site preservation shall be allowed for up to 50% of the vegetation retention requirement. 1. Off-site preservation areas shall be allowed at a ratio of 1:1 if such off-site preservation is located within designated Sending Lands or at a ratio of 1.5:1 anywhere else. 2. Like for like preservation shall be required for Tropical Hardwood and Oak Hammock vegetative communities. b. Within non-NRPA Sending Lands, off-site preservation shall be allowed for up to 25% of the site preservation or vegetative retention requirement, whichever is controlling. 1. Off-site preservation areas shall be contiguous to designated Sending Lands and shall be allowed at a ratio of 3:1. c. Off-site preservation shall not be allowed in NRPA Sending Lands. (8) Density Bonus Incentives shall be granted to encourage preservation amounts greater than that required in this policy, as provided for in the FLUE for Receiving Lands and Rural Villages. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier 27 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT County shall adopt specific land development regulations to implement this incentive program. (9) On-site preservation areas shall also conform to the Open Space requirements as specified in the Future Land Use Element. These preservations shall be part of and counted towards the Open Space requirements. (10) Existing native vegetation that is located contiguous to the natural reservation shall be preserved pursuant to Policy 6.5.2 of this element Natural reservation is defined as that specified in CCME Objective 6.5 of this element; (11) Should the amount of wetland vegetation exceed the minimum vegetation requirements as specified herein, retention of wetland vegetation having significant habitat or hydrologic value is encouraged. Increased preservation shall be fostered through incentives including, but not limited to: clustered development, reduced development standards such as open space, setbacks, and landscape buffers, to allow for increased areas of preserved wetland vegetation. Significant habitat or hydrologic value is determined by wetland function, not the size of the wetland. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.1.2 specifies that within the County's Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of various vegetation retention standards and criteria. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to reflect the June 2010 Land Dcvelopment Code amendments that implement specific subsections of the Policy; and, add an exemption from the native vegetation retention requirements for Federal and State parks, preserves and forests whose purpose is to manage land for conservation purposes. {Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from the AUf!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the Policy be revised to clearly express the intent that Federal and State parks. preserves andforests shall comply with native vegetative retention requirements. but are not required to have a separate preserve onsite and a preserve management plan 1 {Environmental Advisorv Council (A'ACi Comment fi'om the November 3, 2010 Adoption Hearinf! - The EAC is in agreement with the CCPC comment.fi'om the August 27.2010 EAR Workshop.} {Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearin'<!.s -. Staff Comment -- Stat! concurs with the EAC and CCPC recommendations.} Policy 6.1.6: Exemptions from the native vegetation retention requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 - The requirements of Policy 6.1.2 shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses. Existing use shall be defined as: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Conditional Use or Rezone petition was approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application was submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with, or clearly ancillary to, the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe area, and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies for the Rural Fringe Area as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity. On the County owned land located in Section 25, Township 26 E, Range 49 S (+/-360 acres), the 28 CONSERVATION AND COAS7AL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT native vegetation retention and site preservation requirements may be reduced to 50% if the permitted uses are restricted to the portions of the property that are contiguous to the existing land fill operations; exotic removal will be required on the entire +1- 360 acres. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.1.6 makes all existing land uses exempt from the native vegetation retention requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.2 if the effected land uses were issued prior to June 19,2002; or projects for which a Conditional use or Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application has been submitted prior to June 19,2002. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment fi'om the Au~st 11, 2010 Workshop - Suggesting that the last sentence in the Policy be revised to read, "... exotic removal and preserve management will be... ''j (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion HearinlZs - Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as the Policy was adopted as part of the Final Order amendments in 2002 to accommodate the expansion of the landfill. Preserve management is already required pursuant to Policy 6.1.2 (6) of this Element.) OBJECTIVE 6.2: The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment fi'om the Au~st 11, 2010 Workshop - Suggesting staff include within the Objective the requirement for mitigation within the same drainage area as the initial wetland impact.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion HearinlZs - Staff Comment - No change is recommended to this Objective as part of the EAR-based amendments, as wetland impacts will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determined by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.) Policv Relevance: Policy 6.2.1 As required by Florida Administrative Code 9J5-5.006(1)(b), wetlands identified by the 1994-95 SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series. These areas shall be verified by a jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this element, at the time of project permitting to determine the exact location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries. 29 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.2.1 requires that wetlands as identified by the 1994-95 SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series. These areas are to be verified by jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this element, at the time of project permitting to determine the exact location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to include the correct Florida Administrative Code reference - "9J-5.006(1)(b)"; and, include the current SFWMD land use and land cover inventory reference. Policy 6.2.3: Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. This wetland preservation and conservation process shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plan process, as referenced in Objective 2.1 of this Element. However, the process outlined within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away from large interconnected wetland systems. These wetland systems have been identified based on their type, values, functions, sizes, conditions and locations within Collier County. These systems predominantly occur east of the County's Urban boundary, as delineated on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM), within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Many of these wetlands fall within public lands or land targeted for acquisition. High quality wetlands systems located on private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or via the NRPA or Sending designations within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District or landleasement acquisition, or innovative landowner incentives. Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the northeastern portion of Collier County, excluding the community of Immokalee, are contained in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) of the FLUE (and as depicted on the FLUM). Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the Urban and Estates designated areas of the County shall be based upon the jurisdictional determinations made by the applicable state or federal agency. Where permits issued by such state or federal agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within Urban and Estates designated areas and require mitigation for such impacts, the permitting agency's mitigation requirements shall be deemed to preserve and protect wetlands and their functions, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County. shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County shall be protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the remaining allowable land uses. Collier County shall direct incompatible land uses away from these large landscape scale wetland systems through implementation of the following protection and conservation mechanisms: (1) Conservation Designation Best available data indicates that 76% of all wetlands found in Collier County are contained within the boundaries of the Conservation Designation as depicted on the Countywide Future Land Use Map. The overall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural resources of Collier County and their associated environmental, recreational, and economic benefits. The allowed land uses specified in the FLUE's Conservation Designation (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section IV.) will accommodate limited residential development and future non-residential development. These limitations support Collier County'sl 30 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT comprehensive process to direct concentrated population growth and intensive land development away from large connected wetland systems. (2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC) Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay. The land development regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay District, as depicted on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the goal of directing higher intensity land uses away from wetland systems. The development standards for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section V.) specify that site alterations shall be limited to 10% of the total site. The majority of the land contained within the ACSC is also within the Conservation Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of that Land Use Designation. (3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs) Major wetland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to establish the NRPA Overlay District as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and as discussed in FLUE Land Use Designation, Section V.C. These areas include high functioning wetland systems and, although portions of the NRPA Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation, represent approximately 12% of the County's wetlands, which are not located in Conservation Lands. Based on the relatively high concentration of wetlands within NRPA designated lands, incompatible land uses shall be directed away from these areas. Allowable land uses within NRPAs are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 90%. (4) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands Best available data indicates that 16,000+ acres of wetlands are contained within designated Sending Lands and that such wetlands constitute approximately 70% of land cover in these areas. Incompatible land uses are directed away from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands through an incentive-based Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program that allows land owners within these Sending Lands to transfer their residential density out of the Sending Lands to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (and limited Urban) Receiving Lands. A complete description of the TDR Program is contained in the FLUE, Future Land Use Designation Description Section, AgriculturallRural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Incompatible land uses are also directed away from Sending Lands through restrictions on allowable uses. Finally, allowable uses within these lands are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 80% to 90%, as required by Policy 6.7.1 ofthis Element. (5) Flowway Stewardship Areas [re-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and 2002-54] Flowway Stewardship Areas have been designated within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and are shown on the Rural Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Map Series. Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs) are for the most part privately owned wetlands that are located within the Camp Keais Strand and Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands form the principal wetland flowway systems in the RLSA. The Overlay provides an incentive to permanently protect FSAs through the creation and transfer of Stewardship Credits. It also contains provisions that eliminate incompatible uses from the FSAs and, which establish protection measures. (6) Watershed Management Plans Collier County will establish watershed management plans throughout the County, but with particular emphasis on the Urban and Estates designated areas. These watershed management plans shall be established in accordance with Objective 2.1 of this Element and will include the preservation or, where feasible, creation of landscape- scale wetland conservation areas to act as habitat, natural water quality treatment and 31 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT water quantity retentionldetention areas. The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from such large-scale wetlands. Collier County shall allow for more intensive development to occur in Rural Fringe Receiving Lands, North Golden Gate Estates, the Rural-Settlement Area District, and the Urban Designated Areas subject to the land uses identified in the Future Land Use Element, the Immokalee Area Master Plan, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. These areas account for only 6% of Collier County's wetlands. Except for tidal wetlands within the coastal portion of the Urban Designated Area and wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, the County finds that the wetland systems in these areas are more fragmented and altered than those systems located within the Conservation Lands, ACSC and NRPA Overlays, and Rural Fringe Sending Lands. On a project-specific basis, wetlands and wetland functions shall be protected through the following mechanisms: (1) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland permitting; (2) Vegetation preservation policies supporting CCME Objective 6.1; (3) Wetland protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2; (4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE (5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element. (6) Land or easement acquisition. (7) Land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief, or USDA grants for restoration. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.2.3 requires Collier County to implement a comprehensive process to cnsure that wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. The process outlined within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away from large connected wetland systcms. High quality wetlands systems located on private property are primarily protected through native vcgetation preservation requircments, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation eascments, or Stcwardship Scnding Area Designations, or through the Natural Resource Protection Areas or Sending designations in thc Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County are protected through various Land Usc Dcsignations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for thc remaining allowable land uses. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Au!.!ust 11, 2010 Workshop - Suggesting that provision (6) of the Policy be revised to include that the watershed management plans contain designated areas to he protected from development so as to preserve habitat, water flows, recharge areas and to prevent future flooding.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdolJ/ion Nearin!.!s - Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as wellands will he addressed as part o[lhe Watershed Management Plans.] Policy 6.2.5: Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System which is contained within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, Collier County shall direct land uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts within wetlands based upon the vegetation requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element, the 32 CONSERVA110N AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT wetland functionality assessment described in paragraph (2) below, and the final permitting requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. A direct impact is hereby defined as the dredging or filling of a wetland or adversely changing the hydroperiod of a wetland. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (1) The County shall apply the vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall be preserved as part of this vegetation requirement according to the following criteria: a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element shall be met by preserving wetlands with the highest wetland functionality scores. Wetland functionality assessment scores shall be those described in paragraph (2) of this policy. Wetlands having a WRAP score of at least 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of 0.7 shall be preserved on site. This policy is not intended in all cases to require preservation of wetlands exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.1.2 of this element. Within one year, the County shall develop specific criteria to be used to determine when wetlands having a WRAP score greater than 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of greater than 0.7 shall be required to be retained exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.1.2 of this element. (2) In order to assess the values and functions of wetlands at the time of project review, applicants shall rate functionality of wetlands using the South Florida Water Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), as described in Technical Publication Reg-001, dated September 1997, and updated August 1999, or the Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method, F.A.C. Chapter 62-345. The applicant shall submit to County staff, agency accepted WRAP scores or Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method scores. County staff shall review this functionality assessment as part of the County's EIS provisions and shall use the results to direct incompatible land uses away from the highest functioning wetlands according to the requirements found in paragraph (1) above. (3) All direct impacts shall be mitigated for pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (6) of this policy. (4) Single family residences shall follow the requirements contained within Policy 6.2.7 of this element (5) The County shall separate preserved wetlands from other land uses with appropriate buffering requirements. The County shall require a minimum 50-foot vegetated upland buffer adjacent to a natural water body, and for other wetlands a minimum 25-foot vegetated upland buffer adjacent to the wetland. A structural buffer may be used in conjunction with a vegetative buffer that would reduce the vegetative buffer width by 50%. A structural buffer shall be required adjacent to wetlands where direct impacts are allowed. Wetland buffers shall conform to the following standards: a. The buffer shall be measured landward from the approved jurisdictional line. b. The buffer zone shall consist of preserved native vegetation. Where native vegetation does not exist, native vegetation compatible with the existing soils and expected hydrologic conditions shall be planted. c. The buffer shall be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. d. The following land uses are considered to be compatible with wetland functions and are allowed within the buffer: 1. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks and recreational shelters; 2. Pervious nature trails; 3. Water management structures; 4. Mitigation areas; 5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses. e. A structural buffer may consist of a stem-wall, berm, or vegetative hedge with 33 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT suitable fencing. (6) Mitigation shall be required for direct impacts to wetlands in order to result in no net loss of wetland functions. a. Mitigation Requirements: 1. "No net loss of wetland functions" shall mean that the wetland functional score of the proposed mitigation equals or exceeds the wetland functional score of the impacted wetlands. However, in no case shall the acreage proposed for mitigation be less than the acreage being impacted. 2. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland. 3. Protection shall be provided for preserved or created wetland or upland vegetative communities offered as mitigation by placing a conservation easement over the land in perpetuity, providing for initial exotic plant removal (Class I invasive exotic plants defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council) and continuing exotic plant maintenance. 4. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (6)a.1, (6)a.2, and (6)a.3 of this policy. If agency permits have not provided mitigation consistent with this policy, Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that of the jurisdictional agencies. 5. Mitigation requirements for single-family lots shall be determined by the State and Federal agencies during their permitting process, pursuant to the requirements of Policy 6.2.7 of this element. Mitigation Incentives: Collier County shall encourage certain types of mitigation by providing a variety of incentives in the form of density bonuses and credits to open space and vegetation retention requirements. Density bonuses shall be limited to no more than 10% of the allowed density. 2. Preferred mitigation activities that would qualify for these incentives include, but are not limited, to the following: (a) Adding wetland habitat to or restoring wetland functions within Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands, (b) Creating, enhancing or restoring wading bird habitat to be located near wood stork, andlor other wading bird colonies. 3. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier County shall adopt specific criteria in the LDC to implement this incentive program, and to identify other mitigation priorities. b. 1. Policv Achievement Analysis: Policy 6.2.5 requires that within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Collier County is to direct land uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts within wetlands based upon the vegetation requirements of Policy 6.1.2. This policy was adopted as part of the County's Rural Fringe Amendments. Although Policy 6.2.5 states the vegetation requirements for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System which is contained within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, shall be based upon the native vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this Element, the Policy does not specify the percent requirement of retained native vegetation which applies to that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System which is contained within the Immokalce Urban Designated Area. This should be clarified in Policy 6.2.5 and/or in Policy 6.1.2. Section 6.2.5 (6)(5)(b)(3) should be removed as the specific criteria to implement the incentive program and to identify other mitigation priorities have previously been adopted in the Land development Code. 3-1 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT {Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment trom the AUJ!Ust 11, 2010 Workshov - Suggesting that specific native vegetation requirements for Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System be clarified] {Collier Countv Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom the Auzust 27. 2010 Workshov- Suggesting that specific native vegetation requirements for Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System be clarified] {Post Collier Countv Planninz Commission (CCPC) Staff Comment - Native vegetation retention standards for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System will be addressed as part of the 1mmokalee Area Master Plan amendments.] (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the November 3, 2010 Adovtion Hearinz- Suggesting that any necessary cross reference(s) to another Element be provided] {Post EA C and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinzs - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC and CCPC recommendations.] Policy 6.2.7: Within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County shall rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (1) For single-family residences within Southern Golden Gate Estates or within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, the County shall require the appropriate federal and state wetland-related permits before Collier County issues a building permit. (2) Outside of Southern Golden Gate Estates and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, Collier County shall inform applicants for individual single-family building permits that federal and state wetland permits may be required prior to construction unless the proposed residence is within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The County shall also notify the applicable federal and state agencies of single-family building permits applications in these areas. (3) Within North Golden Gate Estates and the Rural Settlement Area, Collier County shall incorporate certain preserved andlor created wetlands and associated uplands into the County's approved watershed management plans, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element. The size and location of wetlands incorporated into the watershed management plans will be based upon the approved requirements for such plans. The County may issue single-family building permits within or adjacent to such wetlands, subject to appropriate mitigation requirements, which preserve the functionality of the wetland within the applicable watershed management plan. For a proposed residence which is to be located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element, the appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. (4) Collier County shall continue to work with federal and state agencies to identify properties that have a high probability of wetlands and animal listed species occurrence. The identification process will be based on hydric soils data and other applicable criteria. Once this identification process is complete, the County will determine if the process is sufficiently accurate to require federal and state wetland approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit within these areas. The County shall use information on wetland andlor listed species occurrence to inform property owners of the potential existence of wetlands andlor listed species on their property. (5) Within one year after Watershed Management Plans are accepted by the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County shall develop and implement additional means to protect wetland systems identified in each Plan for preservation or restoration. Means to consider 35 CONSERVATJON AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT include innovative landowner incentives, transferable development rights, tax relief, land or easement acquisition, state and federal grants, and enhanced regulations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.2.7 stipulates that within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Scttlement Area, the County is to rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable Jurisdictional agency, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council IleAC) Comment (rom the AUl{ust 11. 2010 WorhhoD - Suggesting that wetland mitigation occur within the same watershed) (Post EAC and CCPC WorhhoDs and Adootion Hearinl{s Staff Comment- No change is recommended, as wetlands will be addressed as part of the Watershed Management Plans. Further, mitigation requirements for wetland impacts will be determine by the BCC with the adoption of the Watershed Management Plans.) OBJECTIVE 6.3 The County shall protect and conserve submerged marine habitats. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed) Policv Relevance: Policy 6.3.2 Impacts to sea-grass beds shall be minimized by locating boat docks more than 10 feet from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks shall be sited to impact the smallest areas of sea-grass beds possible, be no lower than 3.5 feet NGVD, have a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no wider than 4 feet. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.3.2 stipulates that impacts to sea-grass beds are to be minimized by locating boat docks more than 10 feet from existing sea-grass beds. Where this is not possible, boat docks are to be sited in such manner as to impact thc smallest arca of sea-grass beds possible, and to be no lower than 3.5 feet NGVD, havc a terminal platform no greater than 160 square feet, and have the access dock be no wider than 4 feet. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment (i'om the AUl{ust 11. 2010 WorhhoD --- Suggesting that a reference to the required maintenance dredging permit be inserted within the Policy; and additional Policies be added, if necessary, to protect sea grasses from dredging activities.) (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adootion Hearinl{s -- Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as dredging is regulated by the State of Florida and Federal government. not the County. Maintenance dredging is generally allowed by these agencies. Mitigation may be required and determined during permitting with the State and Federal agencies. 36 CONS'ERVA TION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Seagrass protection issues are required to be addressed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission pursuant to the Florida Manatee Management Plan adopted by the State in December 2007. The plan calls for implementation of a statewide seagrass management plan, creation of an interagency statewide seagrass monitoring plan, and evaluation of the feasibility of a rule for the protection of the state's seagrass resources.] Policy 6.3.3 The protection of sea-grass beds shall be a factor in establishing new, or revising existing, speed zones to regulate boat traffic. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 6.3.3 states that the protection of sea-grass beds is to be a factor in establishing new, or in revising existing, speed zones to regulate boat traffic. Due to the new FWC Rule Change, FWC does not allow for speed zones to be established based on benthic resources. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted. (Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the AUf!.ust il. 20iO Workshop - Suggesting that the Policy be retained, but revised to reflect protection of manatee habitat.] [Planninf!. Commission (CCPC! Comment from the AUf!.ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that the Policy be retained as writ/en.] (Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Comment from the November 3. 20iO Adoption Hearinf!.- Suggesting that the Policy be retained as written.] (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adovtion Hearinf!.s -- Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC and CCPC that the Policy should be retained as written.] OBJECTIVE 7.1: The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern stafus. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17. [Ihis Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policy Relevance: Policy 7.1.2 Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA Overlay, non- agricultural development, excluding individual single family residences, shall be directed away from listed species and their habitats by complying with the following guidelines and standards: (1) A wildlife survey shall be required for all parcels when listed species are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site or where listed species are directly observed on the site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements 37 CONSERVATiON AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The County shall notify the FFWCC and USFWS of the existence of any listed species that may be discovered. (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated listed species are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. (a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors 1. The following references shall be used, as appropriate, to prepare the required management plans; a. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, USFWS, 1999. b. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region, USFWS, 1987. c. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations found on Lands Slated for Large Scale Development in Florida, Technical Report No.4, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission,1987. d. Ecology and Development-Related Habitat Requirements of the Florida Scrub Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. e. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of the Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco Sparverius Paulus) on Large-scale Development Sites in Florida, Nongame Techincal Report No. 13, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1993. 2. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and the FFWCC, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 3. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as denning, foraging or other indications, priority shall be given to preserving the listed species habitats first, as a part of the retained native vegetation requirement contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 this element. The County shall also consider the recommendations of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. (c) Habitat preservation for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No.8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 38 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nesting season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (e) For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection plan shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus american us floridanus) may be present, the management plans shall require that garbage be placed in bear-proof containers, at one or more central locations. The management plan shall also identify methods to infonn local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. Mitigation for impacting habitat suitable for black bear shall be considered in the management plan. (g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management plan shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be designed and managed using standards found in that district. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved vegetative communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (h)ln order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of Policy 7.1.2(3). (i) The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater than 10 acres. (3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in issuing development orders on property containing listed species. It is recognized that these agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may change the requirements contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such change shall be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 7.1.2 provides guidelines and standards for directing non-agricultural development, except for individual single-family residences, away from listed species and their habitats. This policy does not apply to lands located within the RLSA. 39 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be modified to remove the references to specific wildlife publications and plans listed in the Policy; add a general reference to publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance, since the most current information used by these agencies should be used in protecting listed species; and, delete the reference to mitigation for black bear habitat, as no such mitigation is required by the FFWCC or USFWS. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUl!Ust II. 2010 Worksho/J - Suggesting to add a provision in (e) to encourage the retention of old growth slash pines for RCW nesting habitat.) fPost EAC and CCPC Worksho/Js and AdOTJtion Hearinzs - Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as the Policy requires adverse impacts to active red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) clusters and their foraging habitat be minimized, and where adverse effects cannot be avoided. to compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain Old growth slash pines may not necessarily be located in the best RCWforaging habitat. depending on how impacted the site is. and may be more sensitive to die off with habitat restoration effiJrts.J Policy 7.1.3 For the County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay, as designated on the FLUM, listed species shall protected pursuant to the RLSA policies found in the Future Land Use Element. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 7.1.3 rcquires that, for the County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay, as designated on the FLUM, listed specics are to be protectcd pursuant to the RLSA policies found in the Future Land Use Element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the AUl!Ust 11. 2010 Worksho/J - Suggesting to add the word, "be" before "protected" in the Policy text.) (Post tAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hearinzs - Staff Comment - Starf concurs with the tAC and CCPC recommendations.J Policy 7.1.6: The County shall evaluate the need for the protection of listed plants and within one (1) year of the effective date of this amendment adopt land development regulations addressing the protection of listed plants. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, as the Land Devclopment Code amendment to implement this Policy has been adopted. fPlanninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from the Auzust 27, 2010 EAR Worksho/J - Suggesting that the Policy be retained. but revised to reflect the continuance of the Policy objective.) fPost EAC and CCPC Workshops and Adoption Hem-in!!.\' - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EA C and CCPC recommendations.) .f() CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 7.2 Historical data from 1990-1996 shows that the average number of manatee deaths in Collier County due to incidents with watercraft is approximately 3.2 per year per 10,000 boats. Through Policies 7.2.1 through 7.2.3, the County's objective is to minimize the number of manatee deaths due to boat related incidents. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County's Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01) was adopted within the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC, Section 2.6.22 by adoption of Ordinance No. 95-58) in May of 1995, but was not officially adopted into the County's Growth Management Plan until December 16, 2003, by the adoption of Ordinance 2003-67. The Manatee Protection Plan (MPP) has played a pivotal role in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCC) decision-making process since its adoption. In the years since the MPP was adopted, the FFWCC's Bureau of Protected Species Management's permitting staff has depended primarily upon the MPP to provide consistent direction for the siting of boat facilities within Collier County's jurisdictional waters. Moreover, the MPP lays out regulatory groundwork for the protection of manatee habitat, such as seagrass beds. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on manatee deaths in Collier County waters. Policv Relevance: Policy 7.2.2: Sea-grass beds shall be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this element. Policy Achievement Analvsis: Policy 7.2.2 stipulates that sea-grass beds are to be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect the proposed deletion of Policy 6.3.3, as it is no longer relevant. {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment from the Auzust 11. 2010 WorkshofJ - Suggesting to retain the reference to Policy 6.3.3 within the Policy] (Post EAC and CCPC WorkshofJs and AdofJtion Hearinzs -. Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC recommendation.) OBJECTIVE 7.3: Analysis of historical data from 1996-1999 shows that the average number of sea turtle disorientations in Collier County is approximately equal to 5% of the hatchlings from all nests in the County. Through the following policies, the County's objective is to minimize the number of sea turtle disorientations. Obiective Achievement Analysis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect the most up-to-date, best available data on sea turtle disorientation as follows, "Analysis of historical data from 2005 - 2009 shows that the average number of sea turtle disorientations in Collier County is approximately equal to 4% of all the nests in the County..." 41 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Relevance: Policy 7.3.1: The County shall apply the lighting criteria contained in Policy 7.1.2(2)(i) of this element in order to protect sea turtle hatchlings from adverse lighting conditions. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 7.3.1 requires the County to apply the lighting criteria contained in Policy 7.1.2(2)(i) of this element in order to protect sea turtle hatchlings from adverse lighting conditions. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but the reference to Policy 7.1.2(2)(i) should be revised to read, 7.1.2(2)(h). OBJECTIVE 7.4: The County shall continue to improve marine fisheries productivity by building additional artificial reefs. [This Objective is providedjor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 7.4.1 : The County should continue to apply for reef construction grants and annually place more materials on the existing permitted sites. Policv Achievement Analysis: Policy 7.4.1 states that the County should continue to apply for reef construction grants and annually place more materials on the existing permitted sites. Collier County applies for artificial reef grants through FWC on a yearly basis. Since 2004, the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Department has been awarded three FWC grants for reef monitoring and deployment. Also, CZM staff has applied for other grants through NOAA for marine debris removal. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to refer to "other funding opportunities." OBJECTIVE 9.1: The County shall implement and update biennially a hazardous materials emergency response element as part of its Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only: no change is proposedj Policv Relevance: Policy 9.1.6: A training program shall be developed for emergency response personnel. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 9.1.6 requires a training program to be developed for emergcncy response personnel. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but the Policy should be revised to reflect that a training program has been established. 42 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 9.1.7: The Collier County Emergency Management Department shall be responsible for developing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of the plan, including periodic updates. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 9.1.7 tasks the Collier County Emergency Management Department with developing, implementing and perio~ically updating the hazardous materials emergency response element. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but the Policy should be revised to reflect current departmental reference. OBJECTIVE 9.2: The County shall verify the management and disposal practices of identified businesses that are potential generators of hazardous waste, at a rate of 20% of these businesses per year. [fhis Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 9.2.3: The Collier County Pollution Control and Prevention Department shall work with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to establish a new cooperative agreement between the County and FDEP. The purpose of this agreement shall be to ensure an additional layer of regulatory oversight in enforcing businesses to be compliant with federal, state and local hazardous waste management regulations. Policy Achievement Analysis: Policy 9.2.3 states that, Collier County Pollution Control Department shall work with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to establish a new cooperative agreement between the County and FDEP. The purpose of this agreement shall be to ensure an additional layer of regulatory oversight in enforcing businesses to be compliant with federal, statc and local hazardous waste management regulations. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect that the cooperative agreement has been established and will be maintained; suggest deleting "establish a new" and replace with, "and maintain a." OBJECTIVE 9.4: The County shall continue to implement its local storage tank compliance program. [fhis Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 9.4.3: All storage tank systems in Collier County shall adhere to the provisions of Section 62-761 or 62-762, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) as applicable. Unless otherwise provided for within Section 62-761, F.A.C., individual storage tank systems shall adhere to the provisions of Section 62-761, F.A.C., in effect at the time of approval of the storage tank system. 43 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 9.4.3 states that all tank systems shall adhere to the provisions of Sections 62-761 or 62-762, Florida Administrative Code, as applicable. This Policy remains relcvant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to delete the second sentence, as it is redundant. OBJECTIVE 10.1: Priorities for shoreline land use shall be given to water dependent uses over water related land uses and shall be based on type of water-dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding marine and upland habitat considerations. The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR- SP-93-01) May 1995 restricts the location of marinas and may limit the number of wet slips, the construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan's marina siting criteria. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 10.1.1: Priorities for water-dependent and water-related uses shall be: a. Public recreational facilities over private recreational facilities; b. Public Boat Ramps; c. Marinas 1. Commercial (public) marinas over private marinas; 2. Dry storage over wet storage; d. Commercial fishing facilities; e. Other non-polluting water-dependent industries or utilities; f. Marine supplylrepair facilities; g. Residential development. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 10.1.1 prioritizes water-dependent and water-related uses according to public and private recreational facilities, public boat ramps, marinas, commercial fishing facilities, other non-polluting water-dependent industries or utilities, marine supply/servicc facilities, and residential development. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. This Policy is affected by changes to Chaptcr 163, Florida Statues, which were adopted into law in 2005, as follows: 163.3178 (2)(g): Expands requirement of coastal element to include strategies that will be used to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts, as defined in s. 342.07, F.S. [The CCME already contains marina siting criteria and the FLUE allows water dependent and water related uses in the Urban designated waterfronts. Conservation designated lands do not allow marinas.] {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Au!!ust 11. 2010 WorksholJ - Suggesting that additional strategies to preserve recreational and commercial working waterfronts be included within the CCME.1 44 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 10.1.5: Marinas and all other water-dependent and water-related uses shall conform to all applicable regulations regarding development in marine wetlands. Marinas and water-dependent/water- related uses that propose to destroy wetlands shall provide for general public use. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 10.1.5 requires marinas and all other water-dependent and water-related uses to conform to all applicable regulations regarding development in marine wetlands. Where wetlands are proposed to be destroyed, public access shall be provided. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised for proper sentence structure and to consistently refer to marine wetlands (perhaps modify second sentence to replace "Marinas" with "Development of marinas" and to insert "marine" before "wetlands"). {Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom the AUf!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that the term "marine wetlands" be rewordedfor clarity.} {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the November 3. 2010 Adovtion Hearinf!- Suggesting that clarification or definition of "marine wetland~" is needed.} Policy 10.1.6: All new marinas, water-dependent and water-related uses that propose to destroy viable, naturally functioning marine wetlands shall be required to perform a fiscal analysis in order to demonstrate the public benefit and financial feasibility of the proposed development. Policv Achievement Analysis: Policy 10.1.6 requires all new marinas, water-dependent and water-related uses that propose to destroy viable, naturally functioning marine wetlands to perform a fiscal analysis in order to demonstrate the public benefit and financial feasibility of the proposed development. It is not appropriate to refer only to "viable, naturally functioning marine wctlands" as the proposed destruction of any marine wetlands should be subject to the fiscal analysis requirement. Also, it is not necessary to refer to "public benefit" in this policy since Policy I 0.1.5 requires such uses to be available "for general public use" which is a public benefit. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised for proper sentence structure and to perhaps modify to: replace "All" with "For development of all"; insert ", the applicant" following "wetlands"; and, to delete both "viable, naturally functioning" and "public benefit and.~' OBJECTIVE 10.2: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and continue with its program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policy 10.2.1: Existing access for the public to the beach shall be maintained by new development. New beachfront development shall show on their site-plans existing beach access ways and the 45 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT proposed development shall continue that access way, relocate it on the site, or donate it to the County. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 10.2.1 requires that existing access for the public to the beach is to be maintained by new development. New beachfront development will show on thcir site-plans existing beach access ways and the proposed development will continue that access way, relocate it on the site, or donate it to the County. Further, the County maintains beach access after it has been transferred via deed or easement. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, to make the Policy consistent with Objective 1.1, the Policy should be revised to rcad, "... relocate it on the site as deemed appropriate by Collier County..." OBJECTIVE 10.3: Undeveloped coastal barriers shall be maintained predominantly in their natural state and their natural function shall be protected, maintained and enhanced. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment {i'om {he AUl!ust II, 211.111. Workshop - Suggesting that a reference to maps contained in the Land Development Code he added} (Post EAC and CCPC Workshops and Ado{Jtion Hearinl!s - Staff Comment - The undeveloped coastal harriers identified in the text of the Land Development Code and CCME Policy 111..6.1 are identified by the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System. A reference to the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System maps should he provided in CCME Objective III. 3} OBJECTIVE 10.4: Developed coastal barriers and developed shorelines shall be continued to be restored and then maintained, when appropriate by establishing mechanisms or projects which limit the effects of development and which help in the restoration of the natural functions of coastal barriers and affected beaches and dunes. Obiectivc Achievement Analvsis: This Objective rcmains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised to reflect needed grammatical changes, such as "Developed coastal barriers and developed shorelines shall continue to be restored and maintained. Establish mechanisms or projects which limit the effects of development and restores the natural functions of coastal barriers including beaches and dunes." (Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment {i'om the AUl!ust II. 20111. Workshop - Suggesting that Objective be revised to read, "... continue to be restored and then maintained... H} OBJECTIVE 10.5: For undeveloped shorelines, provide improved opportunities for recreational, educational, scientific, and esthetic enjoyment of coastal resources by protecting beaches and dunes and by utilizing or where necessary establishing construction standards, which will minimize the impact of manmade structures on the beach and dune systems. Obiectivc Achievement Analvsis: This Objcctive remains relevant and should be retained. -16 CONSERVATION AND COAS1AL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the Auzust 11, 2010 Workshov - Suggesting to insert, "mangroves" after "beach and dune systems" or add another Policy to address protection of coastal mangroves.] {Post EAC and CCPC Workshovs and Adovtion Hearinzs -- Staff Comment - No change is recommended, as the undeveloped coastal barriers identified b the County and Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System also include adjacent mangrove systems. Protection is also provided by either conservation easements or Special Treatment overlay within the County. In addition, State and Federal permits require minimizing the impacts to mangroves.] OBJECTIVE 10.6: The County shall conserve the habitats, species, natural shoreline and dune systems contained within the County's coastal zone. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 10.6.2: For shoreline development projects where an EIS is required, an analysis shall demonstrate that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 10.6.2 requires shoreline projects where an EIS is required, to provide an analysis demonstrating that the project, remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. NOAA indicates that at current rates it will take 75 years to reach a 6" increase (2.02mm / year). If the higher rates suggested by the SWFRPC Draft Climate Change report are used (2.3 mm/year) it will still take approximately 66 years to reach a 6 " rise (refer to link below from NOAA). These time frames are well beyond the accepted planning horizon. NOAA Link: httD:/ /tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends station.shtml?stnid=8725 I I 0 The mean sea level trend is 2.02 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.60 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1965 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.66 feet in 100 years. 47 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Mean Sea Level Trend - 8725110 Naples, Florida Naples, FL 2.02 +1.0.60 mmlyr 1].60 045 J.bnIhtY....,Se<lIovtlftllll\t iV~S'i.",,;IIcY~reffl)v.d UflE.trelld UllPer~\"""fid<m(>(:irll!lva' i.JJuf~~'lcPnfldtllc.norv;;d s.o....c.:HOAA OJ) 1),1S ------."-- . . . 4: 000 :; -0.15 -03) -045 .0.60 ?~ '0.. ~ J'<9 ',9 )'.g \0 '$' 7&., .:'0 {Q \9 J',Q., /0... '9 )',9 {Q" ~Q.. .;g., ~o.. 2a., 211.. ~ cv-vs"'o 's ~ ~s \b:)'s 'tI'Vs:; ~s q;,~:S?-o ~ ,,\?"'O's <>t;-tJ.s 't;lJs),o o -0 '0 0 '000 '0 000 '0 '0 -0 '0 '0 '000 '0 '0 "0 '0 2009 SWFRPC Draft Climate Change Report (excerpt below): Potential Climate Futures: This study began by examining three sea level rise "severity" scenarios: best case, worst case, and moderate case are based upon the results of Table 4, below. This table is based on using Tables 9-1 and 9-2 of the USEPA Report "The Probability of Sea Level Rise." Basically, the formula is multiplying the historic sea level rise (2.3 mm/yr) in Southwest Florida (closest point used is St. Petersburg, FL. Table 9-2) by the future number of years from 1990 plus the Normalized Sea Level Projections in Table 9.1. For the study the 90% probability is considered the best case, the 50% probability the moderate case, and the 5% probability the worst case scenario. Staff believes that currcnt building regulations, in combination with the National Flood Insurance Program, provide adequate protection fix all residents within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) (100 year floodplain). Thc building code rcquires all buildings to be built at or above the I % flood elevation set by the FEMA Flood Insurance Ratc Map (FIRM) prol,'ram. FIRM maps use existing sea level and they will be updated every 5 years. The building code requires all facilities within the SFHA be brought into compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention ordinance with any major renovation (improvement of greater than 51 % value of building). All buildings with federally backed mortgages are required to obtain flood insurance. This Policy is not relcvant and should be delcted. However, one or more policies should be added to require the County to monitor and work with federal, state and regional agencies to plan for sea level rise in the future. {Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom the Auzust 27. 2010 EAR Workshoo - Suggesting that the Policy be retained as written to account jiJr life expectancy of buildings of over 75 years.] {Environmental Advisorv Council (EAC) Comment trom the November 3. 2010 Adootion Hearinz _ The EAC is in a),'l'eement with the CCPC commentfrom the August 27, 2010 EAR Workshop.] {Post EAC and CCPC Workshoos and Adootion f1earinzs - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the EAC and CCPC recommendations.] -/8 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 12.1: The County will maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shall be defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e., winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further these objectives, for future mobile home developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development shall include on- site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Emergency Management Department shall seek opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency Management. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: While population growth has stabilized, the county is still considered to have a deficit of shelter space that can be utilized for its population. Seasonal populations, economy and storm surge expected without regard to category supports the need for additional shelter space. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. This Objective is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which were adopted into law in 2006, as follows: [Note: This is not a mandate, rather an option should the County desire to increase residential density within the CHHA through a GMPA.] 163.3 I 78(9)(b) Requires the addition of a new section establishing a level of service for out- of-county hurricane evacuation of no greater than 16 hours for a category 5 storm for any local government that wishes to follow the process in s.163.3178(9)(a) but has not established such a level of service by July 1,2008. Ch. 2006-68, LOF. Policv Relevance: Policy 12.1.1: Collier County will develop and maintain a comprehensive public awareness program. The program will be publicized prior to May 30.h of each year. Evacuation zones, public shelters and evacuation routes shall be printed in each local newspaper, displayed on the Collier County Emergency Management website, and the availability of this information will be discussed on local television newscasts. This information shall also be made readily available to all hotel/motel guests. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 12.1.1 states that a comprehensive awareness program will be developed and publicized prior to May 30th of each year. Evacuation zones and routings will be printed in each local newspaper. This information will be made readily available to all hotel/motel guests and other alternative media forums. The County cannot ensure that this information gets printed in each publication. The Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to remove the phrase, "printed in" and replace with "provided to." Policy 12.1.3: The County shall continue to identify and maintain shelter space for 32,000 persons by 2006 and 45,000 by 2010. Shelter space capacity will be determined at the rate of 20 square feet per person. 49 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 12.1.3 requires that the County continue to identify shelter space that complies with Red Cross standards for 32,000 persons by 2006 and 45,000 persons by 2010. Shelter space will be determined at the rate of 20 square feet per person. Collier County recommends that these dates and numbers be revised based upon the figures computed from the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study Update. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect current shelter space figures of32,000 persons by 2012 and 45,000 persons by 2015. Policy 12.1.5: On-site shelters within mobile home parks or mobile home subdivisions shall be elevated to a minimum height equal to or above the worst case Category 3 hurricane flooding level, based upon the most current National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's storm surge model, known as Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH). The wind load criteria for buildings and structures designated as "essential facilities" in the latest Florida Building Code, shall guide the design and construction of the required shelters. Shelters shall be constructed with emergency electrical power and potable water supplies; shall provide glass protection by shutters or other approved material/device; and shall provide for ventilation, sanitary facilities and first aid equipment. A telephone, automatic external defibrillator (AED) and battery-operated radio are also required within the shelter. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the last sentence should be amended to read, "battery operated radio with NOAA weather S.A.M.E. (Specific Area Message Encoded) capability." Policy 12.1.7: The County shall update the hurricane evacuation portion of the Collier County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan prior to June 1st of each year by integrating all appropriate regional and State emergency plans in the identification of emergency evacuation routes. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. fPlanninz Commission (CCPC! Comment from the AUJ!ust 27. 2010 EAR Workshop- Suggesting to add the requirement to "coordinate with municipalities. 'j fPost EAC and CCPC Workshops and AdOlJ/ion HearinJ!s - Staff Comment - Staff concurs with the CCPC recommendation.) Policy 12.1.9: Collier County shall annually update its approved Hazard Mitigation Plan, formerly known as the "Local Hazard Mitigation Strategy" through the identification of new or ongoing local hazard mitigation projects and appropriate funding sources for such projects. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant, but should be revised to read, "Collier County through its Local Mitigation Working Group shall annually update its approved Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS), 50 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT through the identification and review of new or ongoing local hazard mitigation projects including, appropriate funding sources for such projects." Policy 12.1.11: The County will continue to coordinate with Collier County Public Schools to ensure that all new public schools outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area are designed and constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria, as contained in "State Requirements for Educational Facilities" (1999). Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the referenced date should be revised to reflect the year 2007. Policy 12.1.12: The County will continue to work with the Board of Regents of the State University System to ensure that all new facilities in the State University System that are located outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area are designed and constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria, as contained in "State Requirements for Educational Facilities" (1999) and the Florida Building Code. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the referenced date should be revised to reflect the year 2007. Policy 12.1.13: The County will continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre-disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding, and from funds identified in the State's annual shelter deficit studies. Policy Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, cost-sharing and other requirements sometimes are not acceptable to the County. The Policy should be revised to delete the word "from" after the word "and"; and, add the phrase, ".. .as funding requirements permit." at the end of the paragraph. Policy 12.1.14: Prior to adoption of the 2007 Annual Update and Inventory Report (A.U.I.R.), Collier County shall evaluate whether to include hurricane shelters in the 5-year schedule of Capital Improvements. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, as the Board of County Commissioners does not support the inclusion of hurricane shelters within the 5-year schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 12.1.15: All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed for more than 15 clients will have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that is required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 1999). Additionally this area shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than 48 hours. 51 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to make consistent with current State and Local guidelines: delete the phrase, "...for more than 15 clients"; dclete "48 hours" and replace with "72" hours; and revise the date reference to reflect "2007." Policy 12.1.17: Collier County is currently conducting a hurricane evacuation re-study. If warranted by the results of these studies, further restriction on development may be proposed. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, for clarity and accuracy, the County recommends revising the Policy to read, "Hurricane Evacuation Studies for Collier County are periodically conducted by the State of Florida and Federal Authorities. If warranted by the results of these studies, further restriction on development may be proposed." OBJECTIVE 12.2: The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re-building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not limited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; b. maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation; c. installation of on-site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; d. beach and dune restoration, re-nourishment, or emergency protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events; e. emergency road repairs; f. repair andlor replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls, etc. [This Objective is provided ji)r contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 12.2.5: The County shall consider the Coastal High Hazard Area as a geographical area lying within the Category 1 storm surge zone as presently defined in the 2001 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or evacuation planning studies coordinated by the Collier County Emergency Management Department and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 12.2.5 requires the County to consider the coastal high-hazard area as that area lying within the Category I evacuation zone as defined in the 2001 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Hurricane Evacuation Study. It should be noted that the draft 20 I I Evacuation Study has been completed, but is still under review by staff and the State. 52 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT This Policy is affected by changes to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which were adopted into law in 2006, as follows: 163.3 I 78(2)(h) Requires a change to the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) to be defined as the area below the elevation of the category I storm surge line as established by the SLOSH model. Ch. 2006-68, LOF. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, except that the definition of the CHHA should be revised consistent with 2006 legislative changes. OBJECTIVE 12.3: The County shall develop and maintain a task force that will plan and guide a unified County response to post-hurricane disasters. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 12.3.2: After a hurricane that necessitated an evacuation, the Board of County Commissioners shall meet to hear preliminary damage assessments. This will be done prior to re-entry of the population. At that time, the Commission will activate the recovery task force and consider a temporary moratorium on building activities not necessary for the public health, safety and welfare. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 12.3.2 states that, after a hurricane that necessitated an evacuation, the Board of County Commissioners will meet to hear preliminary damage assessmcnts. This will be done prior to re-entry of the population. At that time, the Commission will activate the recovery task force and consider a temporary moratorium on building activities not neccssary for the public hcalth, safety and welfare. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to remove the second sentence, and change "will" to "may" in the last sentence. Policy 12.3.3: The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff of Collier County, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator, the Comprehensive Planning Director, the Zoning and Land Development Review Director, the Emergency Management Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners. The Board should also include representatives from municipalities within Collier County that have received damage from the storm to become members of the Recovery Task Force. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Policy 12.3.3 recommends that the recovery task force will include local law enforcement authorities, the Community Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning and Zoning Director, Emergency Management Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners. Representatives from municipalities receiving damage from the storm should also be members of the recovery task force. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect current departmental references. 53 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 12.4: The County shall make every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness requirements of people with special needs such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and those requiring transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide emergency, such as a hurricane or other large-scale disaster, the County Emergency Management Department shall open and operate one or more refuges for persons listed on the County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical and support equipment at such refuges will include, but not necessarily be limited to, respirators, oxygen tanks, first aid equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: This Objective remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Objective should be revised as follows: delete, "people with special needs" and replace with "Persons with Special Needs (PSN)" within the first sentence; delcte"... the County Emergency Management Department shall..." and replace with "... the County Emergency Management Dcpartment in coordination with the Collier County Health Department and other officials shall..." 54 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL A1ANAGEMENT ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defmed below. Goal: General statement that defines what the Element will ultimately achieve. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s). Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s). Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Objective 1 Minor revisions to include certain key agencies. Policy 1.2 Policy 1.3 Revision to reflect the Department name change. Revision to reflect the Department name change. Policy 2.1 Inclusion of the word "appropriate" so that agreements are not limited to agencies within Collier County. Policy 2.6 Minor text revisions to update dates. Policy 2.7 Minor text revisions to update dates and requirements. Policy 2.8 Revision to correct SFWMD name. Policy 2.9 Minor text revisions to include a comma and delete specific Florida Statute sub-section. 1 Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE- Summary Intergovernmental Coordination Element - ICE Introduction and Background The Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) is the portion of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) that contains the County's Goal, Objectives and Policies with regard to relations between the County and non-County governmental entities (as well as quasi- governmental entities, including utility companies). The ICE contains a single Goal, which states the primary purpose of this Element. A list of interlocal agreements is provided at the conclusion of the ICE Objective and Policy analysis. Objectives Analysis: The ICE Goal reads as follows: "PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND THE USE OF ANY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION MECHANISMS WITH BROWARD, DADE, HENDRY, LEE AND MONROE COUNTIES, CITIES OF EVERGLADES AND NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, AND ANY OTHER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL AGENCY OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND UTILITY COMPANIES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, SPRINT/UNITED TELEPHONE, IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, PELICAN BAY SERVICE DIVISION (MSTU), FLORIDA WATER SERVICES, FLORIDA CITIES WATER COMPANY, MEDIA ONE, AND CABLEVISION INDUSTRIES THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY COLLIER COUNTY'S LAND, ROAD OR FACILITY PLANNING TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBLE AND COORDINATED PLANS." Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends generalizing names when possible. For example: COLLIER COUNTY WILL MAINTAIN OR ENHANCE THE LEVEL OF COORDINATION AND COOPERATION AMONG THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS, AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES MAKING DECISIONS AFFECTING NATURAL RESOURCES, HOUSING, HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND PUBLIC SERVICES WITHIN AND AROUND COLLIER COUNTY, TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBLE AND COORDINATED PLANS. OBJECTIVE 1: Collier County (County) shall continue to establish and maintain intergovernmental communication and level of service coordination mechanisms to be used by the County, Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, the City of Naples, and the City of Bonita Springs, adjacent Lee County, Hendry County, Broward County, Dade County, Monroe County, the District School Board of Collier County School Board, the State of Florida, and any other entity that provides a service but may not have land use authority. I Intergovernmental Coordination Element Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the insertion of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, and South Florida Water Management District. Including these agencies will ensure coordination of key policies that relate to water supply planning and watershed management plans. Policy 1.2: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shaD be the designated liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan amendments under review by the County, which have the potential to affect any of the entities listed in Objective 1. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends that this Policy be updated to reflect that the former Comprehensive Planning Department is now the Comprehensive Planning Section. Policy 1.2 requires the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department to be the designated liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan amendments by the County which affect any of the entities listed in Objective 1.1. Policy 1.3: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shaD continue to prepare and review the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as an annual level of service monitoring report for the capital facilities included within the Growth Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the necessary information to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The County recommends that this Policy be updated to reflect that the Comprehensive Planning Department recently became the Comprehensive Planning Section. Policy 1.3 requires the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department to prepare and review an annual level of service monitoring report for the facilities included within the Growth Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the information in order to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards. This task is incorporated into the County's Annual Update & Inventory Report (ADIR) for the County's capital facilities. OBJECTIVE 2: The County shaD coordinate its land use planning strategy, including an assessment of proposed development, with that of other governmental and private entities. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text remains as written. With regard to other governmental and non-governmental entities, as well as the general public, the County takes due care that all matters coming before the Board of County Commissioners with regard to land use changes are properly noticed and advertised, and that there is a public opportunity for all interested parties to present comments and recommendations to the Commission. Additionally, Collier County's proposed GMP amendments and Land Development Code (LDC) changes are either available online, in other electronic version, or as 2 Intergovernmental Coordination Element printed documents. In addition, all land use-related documents are available to anyone upon request for a minimal copying fee. Policy 2.1: Collier County will continue to identify, develop, and pursue areas where intergovernmental land use planning and level of service agreements are needed between the County and respective governmental or private entities. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends minor text change. Agreements should not be limited to governments and entities within Collier County. Collier County recommends expanding to "appropriate" governmental or private entities. Policy 2.6: The County shall continue to coordinate with The District School Board of Collier County for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections, the public school site selection for new public educational and ancillary facilities, and the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency, to support existing and proposed public educational facilities in accordance with the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15,2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text be revised to reflect new dates or generalize text so that dates are not specified. Public Comment from 3-15-10 EAR Public Meetinl!: Better coordination between School Board (sitting) and County Government (locate schools where infrastructure is available or planned). Policy 2.6 requires that the County coordinate with the Collier County School Board on the site selection for new public educational plants and ancillary plants and the provision of infrastructure, particularly roads, to support existing and proposed public educational plants and ancillary plants in accordance with the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in accordance with Sections 163.3 I 77(6)(h) and 163.31777, Florida Statutes, on May 15,2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. This policy should be revised to remove dates and or revise dates. As an alternative, text should be revised so that specific dates of agreements are not specified. Policy 2.7: Collier County hereby adopts, as part of this Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Rule 291-7, Florida Administrative Code, dated April 1994, which establishes a voluntary regional dispute process to reconcile differences on planning, growth management, and other issues among local governments, regional agencies and private interests. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text be revised to reflect new dates and requirements. 3 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 2.7 incorporates into the Growth Management Plan, by reference, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's (SWFRPC's) Dispute Resolution, RuIe 291-7, dated April 1994. This policy should be revise to include portions of Rule 291-7 have been updated since 1994 and date will change per new SB360-2009 requirement. Collier County recommends amending references to date or update dates, and to include new requirement for mandatory mediation (SB360-2009, amending ~186.509). Policy 2.8: The County shall coordinate with the South Water Management District and other regulatory agencies in implementing the Growth Management Plan. PolicY Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends correcting SFWMD name. Policy 2.8 requires the County to coordinates with the South Water Management District and other regulatory agencies. This is an on-ongoing task. Collier County recommends including "Florida" to correct the name of the cited agency. Policy 2.9: The County shall continue to coordinate with The District School Board of Collier County for the regulatory review of residential development for school concurrency, in accordance with Section 163.3180(13) Florida Statutes. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends minor text revisions. Policy 2.9 requires the County to coordinates with The District School Board of Collier County in regard to the review of residential development for school concurrency. This is an on-ongoing task. Collier County recommends including a comma that is missing prior to Florida Statutes, and referring to Section 163.3180 only. OBJECTIVE 3: Collier County shall develop procedures to identify and implement joint planning areas for the purposes of municipal annexation, municipal incorporation and joint infrastructure service areas. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends the text remains as written. Section 9J-5.015 (3) (c) 4., Florida Administrative Code, requires the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) to: "Provide procedures to identifY and implement joint planning areas for the purposes of annexation, municipal incorporation and joint infrastructure service areas." This is the only provision within the State's ICE RuIe that is related to annexation. This is an on-going task. The chart on the following pages documents the inter/oca/ agreements entered into by the County since the 2004 EAR. 4 Intergovernmental Coordination Element ... ... c c ... <D 0 CO " N .-< CO Gl Gl Gl '" C1l CO C1l N N CO ... E E ,g N '" '" N CO CO N CO E .-< .-< ..... N " " C1l '" ::J ::J " " " CO ..... .-< N C1l U ... ::J C1l 0 0 ... '" '" ... CO ... CO 0 III Z CO ... ... CO CO CO CO c .E ... Gl ,g E ::J Z ... u "' ... ... c 0 U Gl <D " " ... ... ... ... ... 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't: Gl N 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ... ..... N N N N ..... N N .. " ..... ..... ..... ..... <D ..... ..... Gl C .-< <D ..... ..... CO ..... '" ..... :t: ..... .-< ..... N N ..... N ..... 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... W .-< CO C1l C1l C1l ..... ... '" -0 -0 'C 'C c: c: ... c1S - c: - c: '" '" 0 C 0 '" 0 '" v; >- c1S v; >- c1S c1S ~ ~ ... Gl >- ~ >- ~ >- >- ~ >- >- c: V> >- c: V> ~ V> >- III E ~ u ~ u ~ ~ u ~ ~ 0 :J OJ ~ 0 :J OJ OJ ~ c: ." c: ." c: c: ." c: c: u c: u c: c: Gl :J ~ :J ~ :J :J ~ :J :J ~ 0 a. :J ~ 0 a. :J a. :J 'f Gl 0 V> 0 V> 0 0 V> 0 0 '" u '" 0 '" u '" 0 '" 0 Gl u Ci u Ci u u Ci u u Z :::; ~ z u :::; ~ z u z u .. ... 0 .!!! ~ bD ~ "6 ~ "6 ~ ~ "6 ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ - ~ Q. < ~ 0 ~ 0 .!!! .!!! 0 ~ ~ i= 0 "6 0 .!!! 0 "6 0 ~ 0 ~ "6 .r::: "6 .r::: "6 "6 .r::: "6 "6 < >- U >- "6 >- u >- >- "6 u u u ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ U III U III U U III U U W 0 c1S 0 u 0 c1S 0 u 0 u a:: ... z u - c 0 w 0 Gl a:: E ~ ~ ~ ~ ell ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Gl c: c: c: <ii c: c: c: c: c: E Gl '" OJ <ii OJ <ii OJ OJ '" OJ <ii OJ <ii OJ <ii OJ U u E u E u E <II u E u E u E u E u E .. Gl 0 0 0 :.:: 0 0 0 0 0 Z ... ;:) -.:: OJ -.:: OJ -.:: OJ a:: -.:: OJ -.:: OJ -.:: OJ -.:: OJ -.:: OJ bD C OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ < ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ OJ) ~ OJ) ~ OJ) ~ OJ) ~ OJ) ~ QO ~ OJ) c: c: <t .f <t Q. .f <t .f <t c: <t c <t c: <t 'C c: V> c: >- >- 0 ~ .te ~ OJ '" c: ~ ~ - '" V> c: V> V> '" V> OJ :J V> :J V> ~ >-- OJ) -" "6 ~ OJ OJ '" c: .r::: E 0 OJ OJ ..c 0 c: 0 '" 0 ",' OJ U U U OJ U -0 ~ ~ V> 'S; c: c: E ~ 'C ~ E .., .r::: E '" <t OJ OJ V> ~ OJ ::J ~ '" '" OJ .r::: ir.' -0 ~ c: c: u 0 ~ ~ .te '" u OJ c: OJ OJ III '" ~ c: c: CO U .r::: '" CO 'C '" ~ -0 :::; ~ ~ w OJ OJ u :;::; 0 III OJ 0 c. E 0 c: 0 0 c: ~ ~ OJ V> '" 0 c: ~ - c. ~ E OJ u '" V> C. ~ OJ 'C c: c: .r::: ." OJ bD OJ 'C 0 x 'C > OJ c: 'C E c: '" '" ~ ~ CO Gl ~ OJ OJ c: 0 .r::: 'C E c: OJ '" - 0 - t ~ :::; :::; 0 ... 0 ~ '" c: ~ ~ '" '" ~ OJ Z 0 .. c.~ '" ~ 0 c. ~ > OJ t ~ W <D OJ) "6 ~ 'C 'C OJ c: U .:: OJ c. ..c :;::; E '" OJ OJ OJ OJ >- c: c: c: .r::: 0 ~ '" 0 '" :; > ~ ~ ~ V> V> - <ii u '" '" 'C 'C ~ '" V> '" c: .r::: t V> '" .., OJ .. t ~ OJ u c: c: 0 OJ V> ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" c ~ '" ~ c u :::; 0 0 OJ) CO <: V> u u c: c: c: ~ '" .E ~ .;;; OJ '" 0 '" c. .., OJ '" "" OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ <D :!ij OJ 0 U c. "6 ~ OJ V> '" .;;; .~ OJ "6 ~ c. 'w E E u E u OJ C. QO .~ V> E OJ .r::: c: u V> 'C E 'S; .~ .r::: u 0 c: OJ 0 ~ '" t tE ~ 0 'C OJ OJ .r::: .r::: u 0 c: :;< U OJ 0 0 c. - ~ '" u C V> .r::: ~ - ~ 0 E ~ .r::: '" V> w V> OJ V> OJ OJ ~ '" O/l ~ V> C u OJ) 0 ~ c. E ~ u 0 c: ." III ." III '" ~ '" ::J OJ 0 III '" "6 V> III 0 ",' :J :J CO V> OJ "- '" ~ OJ OJ ~ ~ :::; ... ~ .., c: c: :;::; i:r:: 0 c: 0 c: - .;;; u 'C >- tJ 0 .., 0 '" '" :::; 'C ~ ~ >- '" 0 0 0 V> c: -0 'C '" ~ :;::; c: .r::: ~ ~ c: '" CO ~ c: c .., c: .., - <t '" OJ '" t '" ." u OJ u I- OJ) '" 0 '" OJ t '" '" OJ OJ c: 0 ~ ~ ~ -= ~ III ~ '" '" c: '" ~ 0 c: V> :J ~ III c: c: c: E 0 c: "6 '" '" 0 >- bJl 0 >- '" - .~ .~ ~ c: ~ OJ Qj U C. OJ Ci ~ OJ ~ 'C ~ OJ OJ C. 0 OJ .r::: .r::: .;;; 0 OJ ~ ." V> E ~ c. .r::: c: 'S; 'C E V> E OJ u :0 u :0 .:; 'C ~ c: ~ ~ c: V> :J OJ '" [IJ c t ~ c: 'n; V> '" ~ 'C c: >- ~ 0 ~ ~ '" "'~ .;;; '" '" '" '" 0 OJ c: 'C Ci ~ c: 0 c: o 0 ~ OJ 0 bJl ~ OJ ~ OJ ~ ~ .r::: :J OJ :::; c: ~ w '" u '" ~U c. > '" w <t ~ c.w ~ CO III CO III "- ~ CL U '" > ~ ~ ~ ... U U U 0 V> 0 V> V> .~ ." ." -" U ~ U OJ OJ C ~ ~ ~ ~ c. ~ a. a. w V> V> V> '" '" '" '" '" Ci ~ Ci ~ Ci ~ :::; :::; bD ~ .!!! ~ z z z >- >- >- - - - - - c "6 "6 ~ "6 "6 ~ "6 "6 ~ 0 'C 0 0 'C 0 0 .~ 0 c: 0 c: 0 c: c: c: U :J U :J U :J >- >- >- >- >- III .r::: 0 .r::: 0 .r::: 0 ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::; u - u - u - 0 :!ij 0 0 .!!! 0 0 III 0 U III 0 U III 0 U ... ... Ii c 0 Gl - ci E ... Gl u.i Gl ,g Gl E .... ... .... bD :l 0 < Z N 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" w w w "- "- "- "- "- ... ... c c: ... 1..0 GlGlGl,..; E E ,g '" :l:lE~ u .. ::::J 0 o 1;; Z 'I::t o C .. Gl ,g E :l Z tl III .. ... c o u Gl > t J!l Gl III =0 W ... o c ... Gl ~ E ~ a: III .. C1.~ ... _ c o Gl Gl E E Gl III l!! Z l>Il ct ~ o bIl Gl ... III U 1ii c o :e c :l .... i:' .~ C w bIl C -.;; III ::; t:oli Gl - . E ; ct Gl ,g u.i l!! E .... bIl:l.... ctz~'" 0.. '" ... M ..... '" ,..; ... ..... 8 '" --- ..... '" --- M co o o '" --- '" '" --- ... oa oa VI >- VI >- (l)t:~t: c. ::l a. ::l (Q 0 ro 0 zuzu _ l... _ '- o Q) 0 Q) >= >= .'!: O.'!: 0 uuuu ~ ~ ro ~ co ~ l5 E l5 E 1: Q) ""i:: CU Q) ~ cu OJ ~ OD ~ <(tio e <( e ,S: -c e e o '" ''+: ..0 '" ::> 1:: 0 cu ..... .~ Qj"O .!!! 4= ~ -c ~ I"CI cu e:> ~ cu:> ::l V'l E QJ +-' QJ CI.l.t::. co.t::. f; ~ ~ ::t: bD.- CD QJ <( CLl e co 2:' '0 't; .~ to I Q.!U"g'Q s:::: -c ::J s:: OJ c: 0 0 ~raca..p ""C >- Q) ro Q) 1:: .~ x '" ::> 1: ~ o 0 (IJ c: t-UVlfO ~ cu 0. '" z ..... o >- ~ o ~ cu 0. '" z ..... o >- ~ o '" 0.. cu ~ >- ~ t :.0 Q) ~ c. o 0 8 C- o." ~ ~ <..i ~ e 1: ..c~ ::S'Vi U cu .... ~ '0 0 <..? 'Q; '" u ~ .;: 'u CU e ~ ~ .~ ." e ~ .~ :s ~ c. '3 o '" co '" M '" ... co o o '" --- co ,..; --- ,..; ,..; oa ~ >- cu ~ 0.5 '" 0 zu .... ~ o cu >= .~ 0 uu ~ co ~ l5 E -.::: cu cu cu ~~ .,,1! cu ~ ." ~ .... e ~ 0 ro 0= V'l C. '" cu o >- ~ u .9. ~ '2 ~ ~ ::>." E e o '" ~ cu .... ~ ~ ::> ~ 0 e ~ cu >- ." ~ 'Vi c: cu ::> ~ 0 U ~ cu 0. '" z .... o >- ~ o '" 0.. ..... '" '" M '" '" ... '" o o '" --- ... ,..; ~ ." e '" ~~ o e u ::> ~ 0 '" u :2: O:i '0= >- 0 ~ u ooa ~ e '" cu l5 E -.::: cu cu l'! 1:~ .s:: 0 u u '" ~ cu cu '" ~ .J:l :2: cu cu .s:: -co...... .~ >~ ~ ~ c. 0 :2: o~~tj >..c +-' >- .t: V'l ..c to U :2: .!'! c. Q) N...s:::: 0 :5 u ~ +-' "E~.2~ ....r::. .....- Q) '" ~ ~ ... ""0 ~ bO c: Q) c ra CU QJ ro VI E .... c: ro 1:: ~ Q) ..c ro 1::-0 ~ ~ ro ~ Cl .s:: E .. o u ~ '" :2: .... o ." >- e ~ '" aVi '" 0.. ..... '" ,..; '" '" '" ... '" o o '" --- '" ,..; --- '" >- oa >- c:~c: 5 f.E ::J uo8 ~ ll:: ~ ~ .~ ~ o~o uvou ~ e '" cu l5 E -.::: cu cu l'! ~ OD e <( ~ cu c: .S: cu ~ E '" cu :2: OD ~ ~ 0 '" vo :2: tl cu ." e e ~ '" ." '" cu ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 0- >- cu ~ ~ e ~ ::> e o cu ~ u E .~ ~ 1:: ~ 8 i::cu e u ::>!E 80 ~ ll:: .9:! .~ cu 865 '" 0.. o ~ ~ ~ ::> cu o .~ ll::.... '" cu ~ f; OD- e '" :~ ~ 'C .- :2: ~ N.... U 0 cu OD ". e ~ ':5 o .'!::: ~ e cu 0 l'! E gft) cu ::> '" u 'C a. f.E c ~ 0 8 ." cu cu- ~ ,..; ?tP-'!: o cu '" ..!a S Q.. '" cu ." ~ u e "'lO:~ .s::....'C :2: 0 0 N cu 0 U e <..? . 'c ..... >- '" '" 1:: ~ .e- ::J VI Vi 00-,:; U vo ~ cu U ~ '5 u ~ ~ cu ~ ::> .s:: e o ~ cu .s:: ;:: e ~.Q t'tl e ro E .s:: 0 cu ~ ~ c. M M CO '" o M ... '" o o '" --- en --- '" "' cu 'C '" ~.~ cu_ > 0 Wu o~~ >- >- ::> ~ ~ 0 Ouu ~ e '" cu l5 E 1: ~ ~~ o 'C ~ 0 cu ~ u u ~ :2: t; 0 'Vi +-' "' ~ '" 1: OD cu .5 E '" ""0 QJ.!? C > tii .2 e 0 o c. >- g E ~ 0'" I.....e 1O..E..1Il:: -v>>-~ "C .t: g: ~ U >- o a1 :~ ~ ." e ~ ro ::J roaoE U ~ E u ~ 0 co w U >- ~ o ~ cu ." .... '" 000 >- ~ .~ ~ Uw '" "- .... .... c c .... 00 QI QI QI 00 E E.Q('oJ :J:JE~ u ... :::J o::t o ~ z o:::t o c .... QI ..a E :J Z .... u III .... .... c o u QI > QI :e .... QI III =:0 .... .... o c .... QI ~ E 'f * III .... Q. b.ll <C .... _ c o QI QI E E QI III ~ z:t > .... o b.ll QI .... III U iii c o .... u C :J ... ~ .... c .... b.ll C +l III :::; .... .... . c .E a:: E ~ <i QI.Q"'; ~ E ::: b.ll:Jo <CZNa:: c.. o ..... o ('oJ -.. o ..... -.. M -0 <= '" V;~ o <= U ::I ~ 0 '" u ~~ > 0 ~u uo(j ~ <= '" ., l5 E -.:: ., ., ~ ~ "" <= <l: -0 <= '" ~ ~ u 0 'C ~ <= '" 0 is 'Vi ..!:: "S U 0 '" ~ ., "- CO ~ >2 '" . ~ g ., :!l :!;!<l: I-'" ~ u o :,'j 3: 00 o > "- '" ~ ;: ::I '" "- ., 0:2 u.. I o u ~ '" :2: ~ 0-0 > <= ~!!1 o V1 ~ o <= o +:; u o ., ~ '" ~-'" <= U o '" u ., <= 00 o > 'Vi ro o ;: ~ '" LU ., -0 -0 ; I Ejg o ~ e .S "'C ~ <= '" '" '" & ~ ~ .~ t 8 ::c :::s I,... :::s .;:; ra c.. Vl :2: ... <D C11 Vl 00 ..... M M ~ ..... :;: rl >- c.. ClJ acE g 0::1 '" ~ o"'C c: u~:o QJ '- ro l... ~ .~ :-g 0 '" -0 0 ., <= "," ""C U c: u.. ~ 0 o u Vl o o ('oJ -.. C11 ('oJ -.. ..... ..... '" ., -0 '" ~~ .,- > 0 Wu O~~ U') >- >- :J ;::008 :::i iJ <C ~ ... <= U f3 ClJ :::i 0 E cc i: a:: :J~ao Q. <= <l: '" ., u <= '" '" -0 .S: "-0 -0 ~ ., 0 ~ ., ~~ ~ ~ V1 -0 "- ., <= E :.e '" .- -0 ., U ~ ~ Cf. '" ~ U QJ to:.= "- "- .0 ., ., ::I ~ '" c.. Q) '0 0 g '- +-' '" ., -0 .; D ~ "'C E ~ ~ ::I ., o <= ~ > ~ u '" ., -0 ~ '" 00;, > ~ ~ ., o a:; , I I I I I~ o ... M ..... ... M ... C11 o o ('oJ -.. en ('oJ -.. C11 o(j '" > ., ~ 0.5 '" 0 z u ~ ~ o .~ a::: Z' (5 w (] u I- <C 3: .... ~ ..... - <= ell '" ., <C l5 E ..... "'i: ~ o ~ bo Q. <= <l: ., 0 ,-~'5o o ClJ '+- 0 '+- 10... 0 LI'l ~~ c: N :.c~oV). c: ____ :e '"0 ~ 0 ., ..2 ~ c.. ~ -0 E '" x ., -0" > ~ c: 0 2 U :::J +-' C. 10.. '+- 0 ~..E .8 c: u >- "'C >- >- U "'0 Q) -c '- co.a~.a';:~ ~~?&~~Q1> c: .~ VI .'t: c: u "'C ::J - l'tI ra :::s QJ :::s 8~~~8~t; .... "..... I.... QJ >- .~ ~ is Q:; .~ .~ :!: o -:u QJ ~"O fu ~ u::'53uVlO'" ~ '" ., <= ~ o '" 'Vi ?: '" ., ~-'" o ~ ~ ~ "- ~ ~-o u <= ::I 0 -g U o 0 u ~ '" .9! "- '" z ~ o > ~ u 5: c.. ..... ..... o o ('oJ ..... M M o o ('oJ -.. 00 ('oJ -.. ..... ., ~ ~ a ~ u:: Q1"O '" a:: u ~o(jo(j ~et)Z- +-' ..... 'C c: VI c: ti ::J ~ ~8Ci8 .... ... <C ~ III <= u r3 QJ :::i 0 E en i: a:: ::J ~ be Q. <= <l: > ~ <= ::I o U ~ '0 .~ "'0 3: u o <= e-:.c ::l :!:: "- ;: ~ <= 2 0 .." ~<= 'L: Q) o > -'" 0 ~ ~ ::I "- <l: ~ oti= ., "" '" <= "e 'u ., .:;: x ., W '" ~ of!! .~ ~ '" o ., ::I U '" ., a:: '" 0 .9! ~ g.'E z 8 1;; ~ '" .- LU u.. Vl c.. Vl o <D <D Vl 00 M Vl o o ('oJ -.. M ..... -.. ('oJ ..... -0 <= '" ~ ~ 0(1 .~ Z- ~ <= '" ::I 08 ., ~ a .~ aJo a::u ~ "5 ., ~ ~ <= "- 0 (J'u "" ~ i:i5~ ~ <= '" ., l5 E -.:: ., ., ~ ~ "" <= <l: ~- ., ;: ., o u '" C. :..:;:: 'u >.0 ~ c ::J ~ '" "- ., ~ ClJ ~ 0-",-", Q) ..... .99 '" -'" E 'w u ..... :.c ~ ;: ClJ > ~ ~ c: 'c :2. ~ ClJ '5 :5 '" ~ :l: 0 N ClJ 'c no o .9! '5 ':; :J 'C <l: "- '" '" ClJ ., ~ ~ ,,-u.. o-g ""!!1 i:i5 Vl Vl c.. o(j <= 'w ~ ., -'" -0 ., > o > <= > '" 'iii ., ~ 'u ~ <= '" ., "- "" ClJ '" '" ~ u 'C ~ '" o(jo o ., ~ ::I ~ U <= '" o ClJ u a:: .... .... c c: ... U") QlQlQla E E ,g .,. :J :J E ~ U"':1oo o 1;; Z N') C c ... Ql ,g E :J Z .... U III ... .... c o u Ql > ''8 ~ ~c w .... o c .... Ql :G E 'f g: III ... Q. bll <( .... ... c o Ql Ql E E Ql III l!! Z bll <( > ... o D.l) Ql .... III U iO c o +:i u C :J .... ::- '.. c w D.l) C '.. '" :.:; ~ 0 0: Ql'" . E 1ii <( Ql,gw l!! E ... D.l):J'" <(Z~'" 0.. \D a a N ...... co N ...... N 'tJ '" '" ~~ o '" <.J ::l ~ 0 '" u :E i:; 0= > 0 _ u o oil - '" '" " g E -.: " " ~ - tlll '" <( '" " - - 'i: .J:: ;: - o +-' .~ - '" .~ E :~ " "- +-' ~:c ~ c 'Vi o '" '" ... E ~ > ~ '" t .E ~ ::l - 'tJ o '" '" u " '" " E '" .<:: " - - " '" '" ~ " ~ ?ir E 'C n; ~ o ::l '" .<:: - '" - ::l ~ ~ E ~ o <.J ~ '" :E o'tJ Z- ~ 0: VI "" .,. N en .... co "" "" - .... <.J , '" '{"""'! ~ Co Q) o '= .E ~ a::l '" N o""C c:: :ttu~:.c CJJ ~ to l- g~:EO '" -0 0 " '" ",,, :.c U s:::: LL ~ 0 o u \D a a N ...... Lf1 N ...... .... oil '" > " - 0.5 '" 0 zu - ~ o " >= .~ 0 uu - ro ~ g E -.: " " " ~~ '" " 'tJ ~ ;:v l'tI ro Q) ... +-' '"C C u c: +-' Q):O ':;: Q) P ""C l... L.. E VI ~ 0 ~ QJ ('Cl 10.. cu ~ c Q) ~-n; ~~ g-t)=6 ro 0 VI to Q) E~ ""Ca.~ ~-o ~.~> +-' c ""c Q) g '- ~ ~ rti QJ ..g ..... Q) ttI '- QO v)o~~~:v Q) QJ (l) Q) OJ E :Eg~~~LU ror'Oa:uOO Co ~ "'0 c: Qj .;; :Q 1: c: ~ .0 Q) 5ro5-cE-;G EE~O~~ '" " 0. '" z - o > - o '" 0.. ~ o 'C 0.. " .<:: - ~ -VI - o '" - " 'tJ E ~ " ~ " ..S:! ~ ~ <( >;;; Qj ~ >- .- ~ t;j ~ .!!i '" o~ ~" '" u.. E tj " '" t; 0. 31E: Lf1 \D en .,. g .,. .... a a N ...... \D N ...... \D " ~ ~ a .~ u: :{: 0 '" 0:: U ~oIloll ~~t)~ t:: t .~ 5 ~8Ci8 - '" '" " g E -.: " " ~ - tlll '" <( 'tJ '" o '" - - ~ VI U ~ 2:l '.5 ~ '2: :g '+::i Q) Vl <.J '" W ~(;--' Q) .~ ~ t;]z 8 E t; 'tJ > <( '" <.J W '" '" " _'~ ~ -5 ,,- ~ E 0 >- C'" Q) tJ 1: Q) "'0 c: ~ ""C c: QJ 0 'S; l'tI ~ U o Q) VI .... '- ::::l ~ _.!l! Co ~ IV o QJ..c: '0 t- 10... +-' U - oZl .~ - '" is " ::l <.J '" " 0:: "'0 .!!i ~ 0.- '" '" z8 t; " ItI .: w u.. '" 0.. Lf1 Lf1 Lf1 .... .... a .,. .... a a N ...... .... .... ..... en " ~ ~ a ~ u: ~ "'5 '" 0:: U ~oIloll ~etJZ'" +-' +-' 'c c: VI c: t: ::J ~8lS8 - '" '" " g E -.: " " ~ =:f -'" ~ o ;: .j!! B~ "'tJ ::l " <.J <.J '" '" " '" 0:: > oIl~ g~ '" z o :::> uo ~ u u:: ro '" '" " 0 0.'" '" '" z ):; - oZl .g a:: "0 in i5.Zi5 ro g IV Z U ::l 1:;; Q) t;: '" ~ " wiI:a:: '" 0.. \D Lf1 Lf1 .... .... a .,. .... a a N ...... .... .... ...... en ~ Q) l0- G: a ~ VI ID (5 ~a::u ~oIloll z - ..... >- ..c: e u +-' ~ ...... '.5 c: o 5 VI 5 zuou - '" '" " g E -.: " " ~ - tlll '" <( " ~ <.J 'in '" ..0 - o <.J ..... 'C ~ VI 1;; tj:: ~ :c ~ '1: '" '+::i (lJ ~ <.J '" 0.. ~ ro <( Q) .~ z ~~~ 'tJ >0 '" <.J Z '" '" " >- QJ..c >- .'!: ~ +-'..... ,,- '" ~ E 0 5 C'"Q)~U Q) "'C c: 10- ""C c: QJ ~ 'S; ro :'Q o QJ VI 15 '- ::::l QJ U Co U I... "'C o VI QJ c: t-~-5ro - VI ~.g ~o+-- 0. ~ '" ro 1: 0 z 0 " .<:: U ::l t cu b: o ~ " ZU:c::: Vl 0.. ... ... c: c: ... '" <t U') co ('oj 111 111 111 '" '" 0 U') ('oj E E .Q rl rl ('oj 0\ rl E <t <t <t 0 <t :s :s 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ '" U ... :s rl rl rl 0 U') ... 0 III Z <t <t <t <t '" 0 c: ... 111 .Q E 0\ :s '" Z CO 0 ... U') u 0 III f- ... 0 ... c: 0 U 111 CO CO CO r- U') > 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 .. ... ('oj ('oj ('oj ('oj ('oj U III ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ~ 0 ('oj ('oj ('oj U') rl ('oj ('oj ('oj ('oj rl ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... W r- r- r- 0\ ('oj C ~ "'C ~ tt: ~ Q) Q) Q) :: ::> ~ c <.> 'C ~ ... "'C ClJ Q) U '" 'C Q) Q) ~ '" ~ ~ > 0 c: '0 .!! ~ Q) '0 ~ "' ~ J::: Q) ::> ~ $: :24 ... 111 '" u cr. u <5 c '" ~ u l.!J "' 0 u: "' ~ III E -" -" o1l ::> > Q) '0 '" c: '0 0 "'C U ~ "'C 111 J:::' ~ c ~ '0 0 c "' cr. u Q) u 'f 111 1:: E 0 Q) '" '" ~ U ::0 .!! o1l 'C E 111 U ~ :2: ~ ~ 0 0. o1l 0 o1l ... 0 E bD u: "' c: .!!! u '" '0 ~ u:: Q) ~ III Z ~ > 0 > bD > tlQ C5 u ~ ~ Z <.> ~ u ~ Q. <( Q)' "'C .;: c: 0 u '0 ~ ClJ ~ .;: c J::: '" .;: c ~' c u ~ ~ ~ c "' ~ "'C '" ~ ::> > Q) u <;= "' c ~ ::0 ::> '" ~ ::> '" "' 0 ~ ~ 0 0 "' 0 "' 0 '" c u; <5 - '" <5 0 :2: <5 w l.!J '" U U u: o1l u 0 w U U U') U W ... I- - l: III 0 111 ~ ~ ~ <( ~ 111 E c - c ~ - c: 3: c E n; Q) '" Q) rn c '" Q) '" Q) 111 ClJ 111 u E u E u E <.> E 0 u E III 0 0 0 0 ClJ 0 Q) ... -.:: Q) -.:: Q) ClJ -.:: -.:: Z tlQ Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ClJ ClJ Q) ::; Q) Q) <( ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ bD ~ bD ~ Ol) ~ l>J) ~ l>J) C <( C <( C <( C <( III c <( c ~ c ~ "' "' ~ ~ C ~ U 0 U U >- 0 c: U') <.> Q) '" Q) '" <.> 'c ~ 0. "' 'C ~ 0. C 0. 0 0 ~ ~ '" E Q) "' '" E ~ ClJ '" > "" 0 ~ ~ ClJ "' ClJ l>J) <5 ClJ "0 >- Ol) ~ ~ '" ('oj <5 0. '" 0. c: u ~ '" X ~ E Q) "' ~ ClJ Q) - ::0 C "'C Q) .E '" 0 ~ Q) c 0 ~ '" ClJ E rn c: c: ~ > '" 0 u: 'C ClJ J::: 0 u: c "' Ol) ClJ 'u ::> ~ l>J) ... <.> '" <.> ~ <.> 0 c: ~ 0 c > 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 rn ClJ 0 '" ~ 0 0 "'C 0 "'C "' ClJ 0 "'C 0 "" 0. CO -" C ~ C ClJ .., E ~ ~ C 0- tlQ c 0. c .:! '0. '" ::0 111 c '" c ::> .2: c '" c '0 w ClJ '" 0 0 - 0 0 0 c 0 0 "'C C "' "' <.> 0- .., '" ... "" ~ "" ClJ 0 "" ~ "" "' rn 0 &:: '> ~ u > III "' .0 U "' .;: 0 J::: '" 0 .!!! '0; ::> Q) .!!! '0; ::> <.> u .~ ~ .!!! 'w Q) U .0 "' ~ "'C "'C .0 ::> B cL ClJ ..c E "' ~ ClJ "' "0 0 'w '" 'C u > ClJ 'v '" 'C ~ J::: U') '0 ~ iii "' tj ~ c '" c.", ;:::- "' ClJ c: 0 ~ .;: ~ '" c 0 ~ u '" >- <( n; u "' 0 cr. c: 0 "' ~ C .0 .!! 0 "' .;: "' 0 ClJ <( '" ~ ~ .- "' ~ .- >- <.> "' 0 u >"'C <5 ::> "' u >"'C ~ E u - E ~ 0 '" "' 0 Q) ClJ 0 '0 "' ClJ ',j;; Q) ~ "'C U Q) Q) ~ "'C <5 ~ c ~ -.:: Q) ~ 0 <.> ~ cr. c J! <.> cr. c: OJ "0 0 ClJ ~ ClJ ('oj C >- u ::> c: ..c ~ ::> c ~ Ol) ClJ ~ E Q) c '" c: ClJ '" u ~ "' Q) '" Q) '" ~ ~ ~ ..c :: ClJ ~ ClJ Q) 0 '" ClJ OJ Q) 0 ..c ClJ ~ '" 0 '" E c "' :s u.. u c Q) > J! u.. u c: ~ J::: ~ :: 0 ::> '0; c ... 0 '0 .., 0 ~ 0. ClJ Q) ~ 0: ~ ~ c ~ ~ c: "' ~ u 0.>- ~ "' "" u '" ~ .., J::: ..c Q) <.> ClJ <.> u ~ .~ C ::0 tJ c: > '" c '" u ..c ~ '" <.> J::: .!<2 .!<2 ~ u ~ 0.= .!! > ~ '" .!! OJ') :;:; Q) ~ .!!! ~ .0 "' 0. 0. '0 ~ '" :0 c l>J) E Q) U '" E (3 '3 3 '" rn rn u c '0 ClJ 'c .~ E u '0 "'C '" '" E 'w '" - <.> ~ c ~ J::: <.> <.> >- '0; ClJ ClJ c: ~ ..c "' ClJ 'E ..c <.> "' "' u '0 '0 '> Q) E ..c ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) ClJ ~ ~ ClJ Q) ::> ClJ "0 ~ ~ '" "' ..c "'C ClJ 0 E OJ ClJ ClJ l>J) 0 c: ;:l 3 ..c Q) ..c '3 ..c 0 c 0 u: ~ u.. :: '" ~ u: ~ u.. .0 >- ;: :2: E '" cr. <( U ~ u: <( ~ "'C ~ ~ c: :: <.> o1l <.> ~ ',j;; ClJ' '" 0 .;: >- ';: '" Q) o1l u ~ ~ OJ "'C C c: ..c ~ Q) ~ ~ "' c u "' '0 ~ Q) '" .!! "' .~ w 1:: .!! u ClJ '" ClJ <5 ::0 tE ~ <5 E l.!J "' ~ :2: ~ 0 0. ~ tlQ 0 '" -" u: "' u: u 0 '" c u:: Q) z c -" ~ Q) ~ e 0 Q) l>J) ~ c: ClJ 0 <.> ~ ~ tt: z ~ u 0 "'C ::> .;: 0 "'C ~ U ::0 ..c OJ '" .;: .. ...; "'C E u c u ~ C ~ ';: ~ <.> ~ ~ c ~ III "' '0 l>J) '" "' "' > '" c OJ "' ClJ "' ::> '" '" "' '" E ClJ ~ 0 0 J::: '" ~ ClJ 0 $: :::; w l.!J iii"Vi cr. <5 U v; u u '" w u: cr. U') :2: <5 ... ... a: c: .2 111 <C E ... 111 W I~ 111 ..a 111 E .... , ... .... i tlQ :s 0 i~ $: <( Z N U') V1 0- 0- V1 .. .. c s:: ... N CIl CIl CIl .... E E .J:I '" ::I ::I EM U ... ::s m o 1;; z ~ C .= ... CIl .a E ::I Z ~ III ... .. c o u CIl > ".i:i GI u .. CIl III :t:C LL/ .. o c .. CIl :G E ~ g: III ... 0.. I>ll c( .. _ C o CIl CIl E E CIl III ~ Z I>ll c( ~ o I>ll CIl .. III U III C o :g C ::I ... ~ +:l c LL/ I>ll C '';::; III :::; ~ 0 0:: CIl'" . E ~ c( CIl.aw ~ E ... I>ll::l'" c(z:::l~ VI '" o o N -- '" .... -- .... .... '0 c: '" ~~ o c: u " ~ 0 '" V ~ ~ ..... .~ o = > 0 ~ V Oo1S ~ c: '" CU g E -.::: CU CU ~ ~ 1lO c: <( c: Q.I +-' +-' +-' ro II) IV >- ~ ..c 0 ..... u ..... ~ ~8~~ ~ ...." VI .= >- ro -g 0 "t:-E."'.t:l ,,~ c: o IV _ CLJ u"O.!2 E c: ~ 1lO (l) ro ~ ro Q1 \I) ro '- ;: 0 E ..... tu~:: to ..c :c c: E ~ ~ .~ II) Qj ~ CI.l c: Eo:S~ Q) +-' ._ c: tlO '"C 0 0 c: 10... II) U ro to "0 >- :: bO c:. ro <t ~ "' E o u ~ '" ~ '0'0 z-~ alii '" ~ o > .~~ "C 'u '0 '" c: u- '" .l!:i cu ~ ~ '" ~ ~ 0'0 ....... :g ~VI .- ~ c. -> - ~ u c: -- " ~o ~v c: ~ QJ~ E'O ~ v M .... '" M M ao M CU'C .:: Q) QJ it ~ .c GJ .~ .s .s ~ ~ c ~ '" 0 cu ~ .~ -= c. u " <(~t; " 0 '0 N '" o o N -- '" .... -- .... .... '0 c: '" ~Z; o c: u " ~ 0 '" v ~ ~ ..... .~ 0= > 0 ~u Oo1S ~ c: '" cu g E -.::: cu cu ~ ~ 00 c: <( cu > o ..c '" ~ '" cu E '" VI o u ~ '" ~ .....0 '0 c: ~~ U V) ~ VI M o '" .... "" N "" co o o N -- N -- N .... o1S Z"w >- c: ';:: t: g ,; g vOv Q:; (5 ,_cu_~ = 0 0-515 VVlV ~ ro ~ g E -.::: cu cu ~ ~ 00 c: <( 1lO .!: -c c: c: c: '" '" ~ ~o c. cu ~ > ~ .E 0 ~ U E ~ ~ 10... '" ~ cu ""'c ~ cu..c '" t: cu dJ ",'C~ "" cu- "" ~ c: :'2 +-' c: 15 ~ 0 U') 'i:: :;:; > cu '" - ~ ~ c: ~ cu 8:~ ~ ~ '0 > .5!:! ro 0 '0 -g E u ro ~ ~.~ " ~ 85 ~g 'o~ v~ ~ VI ~ 'C ~ ro <{ -c ~ ~ c.'Cw " cu u- .>: u- .::! Q) ~ c. ~ c: o ~ cu ~ ~ <(00 '0 00 c: :::l ~ ro e c: .........c Q) c: ~ E cu cu cu >:EtlO cu '" '" ~ ~ c: cu ~ '" .sE~ ~ E ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ .!:!! E.D cu ~ cu > '" E 5: -E l.l.J N o '" .... "" N "" co o o N -- N ..... N .... o1S ~ > cu ~ -c.5 '" 0 zv ..... ~ o cu >= .~ 0 vv ~ n; ~ g E -.::: cu cu ~ ~ 00 c: <( '0 c: ~ '" '" ~~-o- ~ c: ~ ~ bO C ">-.... ro ftI L ro c: c.. Q) E n:I .... > .... '" 0 0 cu ~..... u.;t::: Q) Q) ~ ro t) :c VI Q) co 'Vi ';:: :5 ~ c:..c o cu .S :2 c.. "'C C o Q1 CU.2 VI lo... ..c ...... >.!!! ~ ~ ~ c: cu 5 ~ 'i:: c- o Q) CLJ 0 uEtn"Ri .... ~ '2 > .!!:! ro .- 0 c. E E 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c. '" Z ..... o > - o ~ VI ~ 'C ~ ~ <t '0 cu ~ c.'Cw :::l cu u- .>:u-> U cu U '0.. '5 c o ~ cu ~ 00 00 '0 :::l <( c: 0 ~ to lo... ~ ~ ~ E c: ~ cu cu cu > :c b.O cu '" '" ~ ~ c: cu ~ '" .sE~ ~ E ~ ;: .~ ~ ~ .!!! 2-D cu ~ cu [j ~ E ~ ~ w ao ,.... Vl '" Vl N "" ao o o N -- o N -- .... '0 c: '" ~z- c: o :::l :: 0 ",v ~ ~ ..... .5!:! 0= > 0 ~ v Oo1S ~ to ai g E 1:: ~ ~~ ~ ~ '" .E ~ ~ Qj QJ ~ ~ "0 <x: ::c 0 ..... ~ :E 'Vi u 0 LU c:~..r:::~u.. &..~ 10 ..... >- 11).0 E~u ~ ~ Qj :) ~ .!!! b.O.:t:: e b.O .f:lcCO-E:: V'l 'C .: QJ c: ro ClJ c :c cu ~ ~ 0 '" E :2:s'~~~ (5 E Qj ~ co VI "C a. c >- ra a.!!! ra c-Cro~~ :::I s::: > .s=. >- o ra 0 +-' u U~Ew~ _.~.2~z~ s::: ""C ro l1.I (5 ~ c: QJ E U Co ra ~ LJ.J o u ~ '" ~ '0'0 ~~ OVi ~ V) ... ... c c .... r--. CII CII CII N E E.cM ::l ::l E en u .. :::I l.O ot;z~ c.5 ... CII .c E ::l Z t: III ... ... c o u CII > o,i:j QI u ~ :!c w ... o c .... CII :c E ; QI ... CII III ... Q. l>.O <C ... _ C o CII CII E E CII III CII Z to <C ~ o l>.O CII ... III U "iii c o '';:: u C ::l ... ~ '';:: C w l>.O C '';:: III :::; 1:C5ri CII - . E ~ <C Q.I ..c u.i ~ E ::1 l>.O::lo> <CZN> V) en o o N ...... m M ...... N vo OJ '0 '" "Eo .~ OJ _ > 0 WU>- O~'t= >- >-" :t:: ;:: 0 UUU ~ _ CO '" OJ ~ E ;:: OJ OJ OJ c~ ~ ~ .E ~ ~ Q.l ~ ~ J5 0 _ 'Vi u 0 C ~ .J:: o VI 113 5r ~ E OJ OJ ~ ~ '0 OJ .~ QO.t:: OJ co '" t:: .~ .S '" OJ ~ ~ a :!2 '2: .~ a ~ ~ >- '" 0 c -g ru " '" > o tlD 0 U co E .~ '2: ~ co (5 ro -g uc..rc >- ~ iJ vo OJ '0 - '" 00;, ~ >- OJ :~ > Uw '" ~ OJ '0<': .1:2 OJ w ..c: u.. ~ ..c: >- tlD U " co o OJ ~ tlD ..c:<( ~ ~ ~ co ..c OJ '" E vo OJ " tlD OJ '" ~ co .~ ro -:;; 2 ..c: >- ~ U ~ co OJ OJ ..c: tlD ~ ~ '" OJ OJ E ;;: w ,.... ~ N co '" OJ 0 E 0 OJ 0 OJ 0 ~ 0 tlD", <( <:t "" ,.... o o N ...... o M ...... <:t ~ OJ ~ '" s en <:t '" ,.... o o <:t ~ J1 ~co ';:: Q.l U .2 E 011 ~ ~.g ~ '5 ~ t:: ::J a:a2i58 w !;j: ~ t: ::!: 5 OJ a: 0 E o ~ ~ ~~<(~ III': ~ OJ ~ '" ;;: OJ E ..c: ~ ~ 0 o ~ co ~ V) 0 Q) OJ B U "'So :::l co co ~ ~ ro t:: V'l 'C C 'Vi I- 0 vo >- U ~ I'tI or-! '" ;;:..c: 'u OJ a.. co ~ ro re 11)' c l!) C tj:: (; QJ tlD - E .~ ~ ~ o Z 0 c.::J C- o. 0 E <( U '" '0 .~ u: ..c: ~ ~ OJ " ~ o '" V) S 0:: S I-- V) ~ co OJ E OJ tlD1:: co ';:: co ~ '" vo 2 i5 V) m M '" <:t N m m Vl N '" en o vo OJ 0:: m o o N ...... en N ...... M 011 vo >- OJ ~ 0.5 '" 0 z U - ~ o OJ Z >-= o :~ 0 j::UU <C ~ a: o t: Q. '" OJ III U E Z 0 OJ <C ~ ClJ a:: ~ bo ~ co <( '0 co co o '" .., 0. o OJ '0 .2 Q) vi lo... X u..: r3 .8 ~ lD o o""C 0 ~ E ~ ~ ~~E~ ~.Q56 Vi ro U "?- M t:I.O QJ 0 .~ ~:5 c ';:: ~ c .~ o Q) ~ ';;: :5c:oo :::l 8. V) C. <t :::l (U OJ x >< :::l ..c ro ra '+- +-' I-I-Qj~ ~ ~ .~ -g l1.,. l1.,. ""C :::l vo OJ C. ro Z - o >- ~ iJ 0:: I-- ,.... ,.... m Vl .-< '" m .-< o , o .-< o .;., N Vl E ~ o u.. Vl o o N ...... o .-< ...... Vl ~ ~ c' C E 0 iJ '0' -e '';:; Vl' C co t Q) rc c.oc..Vi OJ 0. ro 0 Cl Vl Z u ro c..... l... ""C C'CI 0 ru 'C ~ >- ~ o '+-;~..... U:ouo '0 co ro ~ '0 '0 co Q) Q) ro Q) ""C ~ U E c+-,O Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ ~'~c!;f co ro ~ .~"E~ ~ b.O"O ~ .... c Co '- E ~ c: ~ a e .;:: ~ QJ Q.O '+- CL ~ C +-' o lo...:~ ~ ~~~~E OJ ~ 0 ::J a ..c ~ ~ ~ 0 .:::: e Q.l 5 -c ~4)-E'~2 E 2 B .!:; 2 re >- = ~ E c +-' I::' bO L- eu 5 .2 l... 0 ..c 0...... 0_ ;u.~~"E bO lo... c:: .- I'D c .!!! rc c ""C ~o~~~ U u 0 0::: 1:;; 0:: I-- vo OJ '0 ~ ro OJ "'So: ~ 0 ~ U W '0 _ co >- o rc 'E >- >- " 008 tlD .S >- ~ ~ gu vo OJ OJ ..c:'O _ ~ ro o ~~ c'Vi OJ OJ '" > E OJ W ~ OJ t:~"O ro ._ :::l C. "'0 U OJ co co o ro ro co 0 '0 0 ~ .;:: '';:; a. o n:l 1: u: ~ ~ - 0 OJ o o...c .f:: ~ E ro ~ Q) tj) I- E co o .., ro ~ o 0. vo :> co :~ '+- ~ U 0 I-- 00 00 '" <:t m ,.... m Vl o o N ...... .-< ...... .-< .-< 011 vo >- OJ ~ 0.5 ro 0 Z U - ~ o OJ >= .~ 0 U U ~ co ro OJ ~ E ;:: OJ OJ ~ ~ llll co <( .& ~ .!J _Vl""g '0 >- " o :~ '+- o U tlD l!:I 011 .50 o ..... ~ ~ U > ~.~ 0 c: 12 a OJ 0.. ~ E c ~ ~ 0 '0' o +::0 l... c.~o.. ~ '0 .s 1;;; ~ c: g cr:: .g U rv ro ""C ~ -erol-O o 0 tlD 0 a. a::: c 0 VI ~ '2 0'" c c: l... 0 ~ ~ :J 'C""'l l-u..lXlV'). vo OJ C. ro Z - o >- ~ iJ 0:: I-- .... .... c c .. m .... 0 ClI ClI ClI .... m 0 E E .Q m '" m :s E '" '" '" :s .. .... 0 '" u .... :s '" '" '" 0 III Z .,. .,. .,. c c .. ClI .c E .... :s , .,. z '" .... '" .,. u .... .. .,. .. .. .... c 0 U ClI 00 m m > 0 0 0 .... ClI 0 0 0 .... '" '" U ~ '" --- --- ClI --- '" 0 m :t: --- '" '" m --- --- .... '" .... "0 "0 ~ c:: .... c:: Q) '" >- 0 C '" v; :;1! >- "0 ..... c:: ~ .... ClI ~ '" '" 0 0 c:: III E c:: bo ~ "0 0 ::> 0 :> ~ ';:; ~ '';:; U 0 ClI u 0 ~ c:: '" ~ 1:: ClI ~ Q) 0 Q) '" U ClI '" u > "0 u: E 1: :2: ~ .. .. :E ~ LoU U 0 ~ ~ ,!!! ..... >- 1: 0. ..... Cl. - o1l ~ 0= 0 c: '" ~ 0 "0 >- 0 c:: >- >- ::> 0. '" >- U ~ U ~ ~ 0 Q) ~ 0 o<l 0 0 0 ~ 0 o1l u ..... .... '0 c ClI ~ ~ ClI E ~ c:: c: E ClI n; c:: n; Q) n; Q) Q) u E u E .. ClI u E 0 0 .. 0 Q) -;:: Q) Q) Z Qll ~ Q) -;:: Q) Q) Q) Q) < ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~ :t ~ "" c:: <0: c: c: <( 0 .<: .,; ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ '~ ,~ '" "0 >- ~ Q) ~ u .<: c:: "" '" '" "0 "" c: ~ 0::- Q) ~ '" ,!; c: 0 00 '" "0 0 "" '0 .... c. e ~ 'C u c:: ::5 ~ 0 .<: '0. a:: Q) 1='.0 U 31 0...... c: ~ '" Q) c:: 0- Q) '~ .!< 0 lE ~ "" 0 "" u ~ '" = '" ~ "0 "" c:: ::5 ~ '" 2: ~ :0 '" '" E u c:: c: '';:; "0 ~ "0 ~ Q) - ~ Q) '" '';:; '';:; '" ';:; u Vl V 0 :> .<: 0 ~ B ..c: ~ 1: 00 Q) c: 0. ~ ~ Q) ..c: Q) ,~ '" c: :2: Qll 0 c:: .,; c:: ~ tlO bD.99 'tJ 0"0 0- 0 ClI c:: ~ 0 ~ Q) 0- ro:'=- c:: 0. c: ~ "0 'iij .<: E 0."0 ~ .... >".P !ff >- c:: 'tJ >- ::> ~ '" ~ c: .. 1: ~ '" Q) u '" Q) '" c: _ ~ c: c: '" U Q) c:: li; ~ > c: E 'tJ ;: "0 '" !!!. c: '" Q) u :> Q) '" "0 Q) ~ Q) >- Q) 0. Q) c: ..... 0 E jij - 0 Q) 0. '" N E ~ "" u 0 ~ >- "" ::> ';:; ..... u c: Q) 'tJ 0 ~ "0 '" <( '3: ..... 0 0 ~ Q) 'C C Q) Q) ~ c:: ~ 0 '" ::> > 0 ,9- -5 u '" ;: n; ..?: .<: ~ :2: > 0 0 00 .<: c:: .,; - ..... n; n; ~ c:: 0 U ~ .... ~ '" ~ ~ 0 u 0 c: ::> Q) ~ 0. ..?: u li; E c:: c:: n; 0 0 ~ 0 '" E Q) 0. ~ E "0 Q) Q) ~ --' Q) ..c: E ,!!! C c:: 0 E c:: ~ u. :2 ~ ~ ~ "".<: >- 'tJ 1: ~ ~ :s ;: - c: .!! 0 "0 c: Q) 'Vi tJO ~ "0 "0 c:: '" Q) c: c: ... 0 >- "n; ~ ';:: c: c: "0 0. -"" 0 U 0 Q) ~ '" E '" .,; ::> '" ~ ,~ '" '';:; Q) Q) ~ Q) '" Q) ., ..... .!! ;: OJ) 6'0"0 0 0 1: 0 '" ;: Q) U "0 ~ 0 u "" ~ - c:: ,- '" Q) ~ '" .<: Q) ::> c:: ~ c:: 0,_ "" ~ e ~ '" 'c: ~ ;: '" "0 ~ ';:; Q) '" ~ "0 '" U ~ ~ "0 c:: ~ 0 ,= .0 ~ ~ ::> ;:: lE .<: t' 'E c: 'C ~ t' ~ .<: U 'iij u "0 ~ 0 ::> c: "0 .... 0 .~ ~ ~ " Q) 'tJ 0 0 0 0 c: '" ..... c:: "0 ~ ~ u u '" ~ 0 u: ~ U 0. '" m > >- .... ~ 0 .... 0 0 u C u ~ ~ .... ~ Q) '" '" :2: l>O ::;; "0 '" C - ..... "Eo ..... "0 .... 0 "0 0 0 c:: c: III >- '" >- Q) >- '" ~ ~ ~ :::; 0 v; 0 > 0 v; LoU .... .. Ii c 0 ClI ... ci E .. ClI W ClI .c ClI E ... .. ... l>O :s Q < Z N 0: a:: a:: ..... ..... ..... SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EV ALVA nON & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Future Land Use Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below, Goal: General statement that defines what the Element will ultimately achieve, Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describes actions that will help achieve the goal(s). Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s). Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Policy] .4: Policy 2.1: Policy 2.4: Policy 2.5: Policy 4.5 Policy 4.7: Policy 5.3: Policy 5.14: Revise to allow for, but not mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace "shall" with "may"), Revise to correct the CIE Policy reference. If changes are made to the Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion Area density reduction factor, as proposed, then revise this policy to delete that reference. Revise to reflect the existence of the TCMAs (perhaps replace "shall designate" on first line with "has designated"). Revise to recognize the periodic update (perhaps replace the last sentence with a commitment to periodically update the inventory). Revise to specify that a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless first approved by the Board, to add reference to the lmmokalee Redevelopment Plan, and to correct the date reference. Revise to clarify changes to the Urban designation refers to the new designation of lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the third line with "addition"). Revise as necessary to reflect the changed status and contents of the Inter-local Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the Public School Facilities Element. J FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Objective 6: Revise to reference the establishment of TCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace "are hereby" in the last sentence with "have been"), Policy 6.3: Revise paragraph e) to begin with a verb so as to follow the sentence structure (perhaps add "Providing" before "Vehicular''). Objective 7: Revise to reference reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce greenhouse gas emissions," on the second line after "policies,". Policy 7.3: Revise for proper wording (perhaps replace "and their interconnection points" with "and/or provide intcrconnection(s)." Policy 7.7: Revise to update the Division name, Density Rating System - Residential In-fill: Revise to eliminate TOR requirement. Density Rating System - Traffic Congestion Area: Delete, and replace with a Coastal High Hazard Area density reduction factor; so reflect this on the FLUM; make correlating changes to all GMP references to this provision; revise both the Roadway Access and Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuses to replace reference to this provision with CHHA reference; and, revise the Conversion of Commercial Bonus to prohibit its application within the CHHA. The Atrordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus would continue to apply within the CHl-IA. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict: Revise to reduce allowable density for residential-only projects within the CHHA to a maximum of 4 DU/A; revise the Master Planned Activity Center provision for clarity, and possible substantive change, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District: Revise to clarify the District only applies to A-zoned lands; to correct a miss-numbering in the RFMUD Sending Lands designation; and, revise the Exemption provision to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and to delete unneeded text from the Exemption title, Future Land Use Map: Revise the CHHA boundary to correlate with any CHHA boundary description change made in CCME Policy 12,2,5, Planning Horizon Issue: Revise the various planning horizons in the GMP to be consistent. Designation/District/Subdistrict Relationship: Revise throughout to clarify the relationship between Designations, Districts and Subdistricts, Map FLUE-14 Existing Zoning Consistent with FLUE by Policy, Immokalee Area: Delete; replacement map to be adopted into the Immokalee Area Master Plan to correlate with new Policy 6,1,9 in that Master Plan, EAR Bee - FLUE Summary of Recommended Changes 1-6-11 2 FLUE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES An Assessment of the Success and Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Future Land Use Element A. Introduction and Background The Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) establishes the geographic framework for growth and development in Collier County. As such, the FLUE is the most frequently amended portion of the GMP, Since the adoption of the County's 2004 EAR-based Amendments in January 2007, the FLUE has been amended on six occasions. The FLUE includes three major sections: an Overview, the Implementation Section, and a Support Document containing land use data and analysis. The purpose of the Overview is to provide an introduction as to the purpose, basis and underlying concepts and special issues addressed by the FLUE. The Implementation Strategy is where the Element is brought into legal effect. Included within this section are the Goals, Objectives, Policies and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and correlating Future Land Use Designation Description Section, Collier County's FLUE gives emphasis to the future land use categories (designations) contained in the Future Land Use Designation Description Section of the Implementation Strategy, The Support Document is comprised of land use data and analysis which provides a basis for the Implementation Strategy and serves to meet the requirements of Section 9J-5,006, Florida Administrative Code, minimum requirements for the FLUE, The overall purpose of the FLUE is to guide decision-making with regard to regulatory, financial and programmatic matters pertaining to land use, This Element controls the location, type, intensity and timing of new or revised uses of land, The land use strategy is closely coordinated with the County's strategy for the provision of public facilities, as described in the Capital Improvements and Public Facility Elements (and Sub-elements) of the GMP and with the strategies to protect and conserve natural resources as found in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. HB 697 was enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008, and now, in part, is codified within Ch. 163.3 I 77(6)(a) and (d). It requires the future land use plan to discourage urban sprawl, to be based upon energy-efficient land use patterns and to include greenhouse gas reduction strategies. All of these requirements are addressed in the existing Objectives and Policies within the FLUE, as noted in the assessment below. HB 697 also requires the future land use map to "identify and depict.,. energy conservation," Collier County has no energy conservation features, such as the DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center in DeSoto County, to depict on its future land use map. Instead, energy conservation measures occur at a micro scale, e.g. solar panels on individual single family dwellings. B. Objective Analysis OBJECTIVE 1: Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Future land Use Map. The Future land Use Map and companion Future land Use Designations, Districts and Sub-districts shall be binding on all Development Orders effective with the adoption of this Growth Management Plan. Standards and permitted uses for each Future land Use District and Subdistrict are identified in the Designation Description Section. Through the magnitude, location and 1 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT configuration of its components, the Future land Use Map is designed to coordinate land use with the natural environment including topography, soil and other resources; promote a sound economy; coordinate coastal population densities with the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Plan; and discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl. {This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 1.4: The CONSERVATION Future land Use Designation shall include a Future land Use District. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy has existed in the FLUE since the GMP was adopted in 1989. A District has never been created - or needed - in this Designation, However, the potential remains for a District to be created. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to allow for, but not mandate, the creation of a District (perhaps replace "shall" with "may"), OBJECTIVE 2: The coordination of land uses with the availability of public facilities shall be accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvements Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the land Development Code. (This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policv Relevance: Policy 2.1: The County shall prepare annually the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities which shall include a determination of the existing conditions of capital public facilities, determine the remaining available capacity, forecast future needs in the five year capital improvement schedule and identify needed improvements and funding to maintain the level of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvements Element. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The annual preparation of an AUIR continues to be a valuable tool for Collier County. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to correct the CIE Policy reference. Policy 2.4 Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6){a) 3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element, development located within the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) (See Map TR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element. Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation, pursuant to the certification process described in Transportation Element, Policy 5.5, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00 the Collier County land Development Code, as amended) as part of their plan of development :2 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion Density Reduction requirement as contained in the Density Rating System of this Element Developments within the Northwest and East-Central TCMAs that meet the requirements of FLUE Policies 6.1 through 6.5, and Transportation Policies 5.7 and 5.8, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended) as part of their plan of development shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion Density Reduction requirement as contained in the Density Rating System of this Element. Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The provisions of this Policy remain viable and appropriate, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. However, if changes are made to the Density Rating System to delete the Traffic Congestion Area density reduction factor, as proposed later in this FLUE Assessment, then this policy should be revised to delete that reference, Policy 2.5 The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the Transportation Element. Standards within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and Policies 6.1 through 6.5 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby designated: 1. Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (See Map TR-5). 2. East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (See Map TR-6). Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County has designated both referenced TCMAs, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to reflect the existence of the TCMAs (perhaps replace "shall designate" on first line with "has designated"). OBJECTIVE 4: In order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design, the Future Land Use Element shall be continually refined through detailed planning. Future studies might address specific 3 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT geographic or issue areas. All future studies must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and further its intent. [This Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change is proposed[ Policv Relevance: Policy 4.5: An Industrial Land Use Study has been developed and a summary of the Study has been incorporated into the support document of this Growth Management Plan. The Study includes a detailed inventory of industrial uses, projections of demand for industrial land, and recommendations for future land use allocations and locational criteria. Subsequent to completion of the Economic Element of this Growth Management Plan, adopted in December 2003, staff shall prepare an update to the Industrial Land Use Study. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy provides historical referencc to an Industrial Land Use Study, Collier County has prepared an update to the Study, by updating the Industrial inventory, about every 2-3 years, depending upon staffing and workload, Such updates should continue to bc prepared. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to recognize the periodic update (perhaps replace the last sentence with a commitment to periodically update thc inventory), Policy 4.7: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on March 14, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US 41 East, Davis Boulevard and Airport-Pulling Road. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge Road, between U.S. 41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road; b. U.S. 41 North in Naples Park; and, c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The only redevelopment plans approved by the Board are within the boundaries of a CRA (Bayshore/Gateway Triangle and Immokalcc), Preparation of redevelopment plans in the future, as may be directed by the Board, remains an appropriate planning opportunity, Omitted from this Policy is reference to the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan, Also. the referenced date is incorrect. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to specify that such a redevelopment plan may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless first approved by the Board, to add rcference to the Immokalee Redevelopment Plan, and to correct the date reference. Policy 4.8: Maintain and update, on an annual basis, the following demographic and land use information: existing permanent population, existing seasonal population, projected population, existing 4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT dwelling units, and projected dwelling units. Included with this database shall be a forecast of the geographic distribution of anticipated growth. Population estimates and projections shall be based upon the most recent population bulletin from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR), except where decennial census estimates are available. For the annually updated Capital Improvement Plan, on a continuously rolling basis, population projections shall be calculated for all public facilities using BEBR's medium range growth rate. Population definitions are provided in Policy 1.2 of the Capital Improvement Element. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County prepares the information required by this Policy and should continue to do so. However, the County should evaluate the presently-used geographic distribution areas (Planning Communities) for appropriateness of boundaries. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written. OBJECTIVE 5: In order to promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element, the following general land use policies shall be implemented upon the adoption of the Growth Management Plan. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposedj Policv Relevance: Policy 5.3: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any changes to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County implements this Policy through the provisions of the Urban designation as well as the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to clarify changes to the Urban designation refers to the new designation of lands as Urban (perhaps replace "changes" in the third line with "addition"). Public Comment (Communitv Meetinl! held on 1/25/10).- Public stated, regarding below item at FLUE Policy 5,6 ("encourage "experimental" zoning ... "), change the TDR program to require use of TDR's to obtain additional density (cluster housing, guesthouses). 5 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 5.14: Public educational plants and ancillary plants: a. Existing public educational plants and ancillary plants: The sites containing existing public educational plants (schools and associated on-site facilities, including sports stadiums, gymnasiums and recreation areas) and ancillary plants (support facilities, including administrative offices, transportation facilities, maintenance yards, and bus barns) are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series. This includes four sites where educational plants have been approved but construction either has not commenced or is not completed. More detailed descriptions or depictions of all of the sites containing these existing educational plants and ancillary plants are contained in the FLUE Support Document. Expansion of these educational plants and ancillary plants on these existing sites, as well as expansions to the sites themselves, are subject to the provisions outlined in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. b. Existing sites for future public educational plants: The Collier County School Board has acquired numerous sites for which educational plants are planned for future development; these sites contain no existing educational plants. These sites are consistent with locational criteria established by the SBR Interlocal Agreement and as contained in the FLUE, GGAMP, or lAMP, as applicable, and are allowed within the existing zoning district on the property. These sites are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series. Development of the mapped sites shall be subject to the provisions of the generallnterlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. c. Existing sites for future public ancillary plants: The Collier County School Board has acquired sites for which ancillary plants are planned for future development; these sites contain no existing ancillary plants, These sites are consistent with locational criteria established by the SBR Interlocal Agreement and as contained in the FLUE, GGAMP, or lAMP, as applicable, and are allowed within the existing zoning district on the property. These sites are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series. Development of the mapped sites shall be subject to the provisions of the general Interlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. d. Future sites for public educational plants and ancillary plants: As additional sites for educational plants and ancillary plants are acquired by the Collier County School Board and deemed to be consistent with the FLUE, GGAMP, or lAMP, as applicable, and allowed by existing zoning on the site, these sites will be added to the Future Land Use Map Series 6 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT and Public School Facilities Element Map Series, as provided for in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. Future development of these sites will be subject to the provisions of the aforementioned general Interlocal Agreement and SBR Interlocal Agreement, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. Prior to site acquisition, the Collier County School District will provide notification to property owners as follows: 1) for sites located within the Urban Designated Area of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, notices shall be sent to all owners of property within 500 linear feet of the property lines of the site under consideration for acquisition; 2) for sites not located within the Urban Designated Area of the FLUE of the Growth Management Plan, notices shall be sent to all owners of property within 1,000 linear feet of the property lines of the site under consideration for acquisition. At the public hearing to consider the land acquisition, all public commentary received as a result of these notices will be provided to the Collier County School Board. e. Zoning district provisions for future educational plants: Except to the extent that such would be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District adopted on June 19, 2002, or the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay adopted on October 22, 2002, all future educational plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as follows: (1) Educational plants are prohibited in the Residential Tourist (RT), Golf Course (GC), Conservation (CON), Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC), Business Park (BP), and Industrial (I) zoning districts. (2) Educational plants are permitted by right in all other zoning districts. However, for a high school facility to be located in any residential zoning district, or Estates (E) zoning district, or residential component of a PUD, a formal compatibility review and determination is required, as set forth in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. f. Zoning district provisions for future ancillary plants: Except to the extent that such would be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District adopted on June 19, 2002, or the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay adopted on October 22, 2002, all future ancillary plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as follows: (1) Ancillary plants are prohibited in the Residential Single Family (RSF-1 through RSF-6), Mobile Home (MH), Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC), Golf Course (GC), and Conservation (CON) zoning districts. (2) Ancillary plants are permitted by right in the General Commercial (C-4), Heavy Commercial (C-5), and Industrial (I) zoning districts. (3) Ancillary plants are permitted by conditional use approval in all other zoning districts. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy recognizes and implements the two Inter-local Agreements adopted in 2003 by the BCC and Collier County School Board. Since then, one of the Agreements has been superseded (adopted in 2008 along with the Public School Facilities Element), the other one has expired and its replacement is presently being negotiated. 7 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised as necessary to reflect the changed status and contents of the Agreements as well as any changes necessary to correlate with the Public School Facilities Element. Objective 6 Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) are geographically compact areas designated in local government comprehensive plans where intensive development exists, or such development is planned. New development within a TCMA shall occur in a manner that will ensure an adequate level of mobility (as defined in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals and policies: discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources, protecting historic resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit, bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby established in the specific geographic areas described in Policy 2.5 of this Element. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: TCMAs remain a viable transportation management tool. This Objective is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and direction of HB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008, This Objective remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to reference the establishment of TCMAs in past tense (perhaps replace "are hereby" in the last sentence with "have been"), Public Comment (Communitv Meetinl! held on 1/25/1 (}). Public stated County should reserve right-o~wayfor light rail. Policv Relevance: Policy 6.3: In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management (TOM) strategies, as may be applicable: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to abutting commercial properties. d) Including affordable housing (minimum of 25% of the units) within the development. e) Vehicular access to abutting commercial properties. Policv Achievement Analvsis: This Policy is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and direction of HB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but paragraph e) should be revised to begin with a verb so as to follow the sentence structure (perhaps add "Providing" before "Vehicular"), 8 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 7 In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The direction provided by this Objective is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and direction of HB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008. Comprehensive Planning staff reviews all rezone and conditional use petitions for compliance with the Policies under this Objective. This Objective remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to reference reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (perhaps add "reduce greenhouse gas emissions," on the second line after "policies,". Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf! held on 1/25/10): Public stated encourage smart growth principles -- mixed use, urban infill, walkable communities, alternate transportation modes, and more green space, Policv Relevance: Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Policy Achievement Analvsis: The direction provided by this Policy is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and direction ofHB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised for proper wording as connecting interconnection points is nonsensical (perhaps replace "and their interconnection points" with "and/or provide interconnection(s)," Public Comment (Communitv Meetinf! held on 3/15/10): Public stated stress interconnection and continuity. Policy 7.7 The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will continue to research smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land development regulations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The direction provided by this Policy is still appropriate, all the more so given the requirements and direction of HB 697 enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2008. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but should be revised to update the Division name to reflect 20 I 0 reorganization. 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT C. Future Land Use Designation Description - Assessment of Select Provisions In addition to the above Assessment of FLUE GOPs, staff provides below an Assessment of select portions of the Future Land Use Designation Description Section. Urban Designation, Density Rating System Residential In-fill: To encourage residential in-fill in areas of existing urban development outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area, a maximum of 3 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be added if the following criteria are met: (a) The project is 20 acres or less in size; (b) At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer; (c) The project is compatible with surrounding land uses; (d) The property in question has no common site development plan with adjacent property; (e) There is no common ownership with any adjacent parcels; (f) The parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density bonus and was created before the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; (g) Of the maximum 3 additional units, one (1) dwelling unit per acre shall be transferred from Sending Lands; and, (h) Projects qualifying under this provision may increase the density administratively by a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre by transferring that additional density from Sending Lands. Provision Analvsis: In the FLUE, the system currently contains both density bonuses and a density reduction, Within most parts of the Urban Area, the base (or minimum) eligible residential density (i,e" the number of units allowed per acre) is four units per gross acre and the maximum eligible density is 16 units per acre, with one exception; eligible density is not an entitlement. This system allows a residential project, or the residential portion of a mixed-use project, to request increased residential density above the base density, or to lose density, if the project meets certain criteria, There are seven density bonus provisions and one density reduction provision, A project may, or may not, be eligible for any number or combination of these bonuses. The Residential Infill bonus has existed since the GMP was adopted in 1989 and has been used numerous times. However, as part of the Rural Fringe GMP amendments adopted in 2002, this bonus provision was modified to increase the eligible property size from 10 to 20 acres, and to add the requirement that part of the density bonus be derived from TOR credits obtained from RFMUD Sending Lands. The purpose of requiring TOR credits was to help insure the success of the TOR program. It has not worked; since the 2002 amendment, this bonus provision has rarely been used _ perhaps once or twice, Though the purpose for requiring use of TOR credits remains valid, that requirement has stifled the use of this bonus provision intended to encourage infill development. The County recommends the TOR requirement be eliminated. [Recommendation from October 8,2010 Florida Deoartment o(Transoortation (FDOT) Comments to the DCA on Prooosed EAR (Comment #13): "It is not clear how much additional development could occur should the elimination of the TDR requirement to qualify ji)r the Residential 1njill bonus density 10 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT occur. Should substantial additional development occur from this amendment, the department recommends that an area wide traffic study be conducted and supporting documentation be provided to establish that adequate capacity will be available for new trips that will impact state facilities for the long-term horizon year and short-term year 2015 conditions. " Collier County response: The existing Residential Infill bonus provision allows a density bonus of up to three dwelling units per acre (3 DU/A), as would the provision with the recommended amendment. The recommended amendment itself does not allow for a density increase, rather changes how that same density bonus of up to 3 DU/A is derived. However, Collier County acknowledges that the use of this provision is expected to increase if the recommended amendment is adopted, resulting in more density than would be expected without the amendment. There are approximately 225 parcels of land zoned A, Rural Agricultural that could potentially be rezoned to residential zoning districts utilizing the Residential Infill bonus; this would yield a potential density increase of approximately 2,850 dwelling units. However, it is reasonable to assume that not all of this land will be rezoned to residential zoning districts, rather some may be developed under the "A" zoning district which allows a variety of institutional uses (child care center, church, nursing home, private school, social and fraternal organizations, retail plant nursery, etc.) and essential services (fire/police/emergency medical service stations, public parks, goverrunent offices, etc.), and some may rezone to residential at a density not utilizing this density bonus, Assuming a 75% rezone rate utilizing the "increased" density allowance, the potential density "increase" of the recommended amendment would be approximately 2,140 DUs. Based upon property locations, these DUs could be distributed throughout the affected area, from along US 41 North near the Lee County line to south of Davis Blvd. (SR 84) and east of Santa Barbara Blvd. Extension, Urban Designation, Density Rating System Traffic Congestion Area: If the project lies within the Traffic Congestion Area, an area identified as subject to long range traffic congestion, one dwelling unit per gross acre would be subtracted from the eligible base density of four dwelling units per acre. The Traffic Congestion Boundary is shown on the Future land Use Map and consists of the western coastal Urban Designated Area seaward of a boundary marked by Airport-Pulling Road (including an extension north to the lee County boundary.) Davis Boulevard, County Barn Road, and Rattlesnake Hammock Road consistent with the Mixed Use Activity Center's residential density band located at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and County Road 951 (including an extension to the east, but exclusive of the outlying Urban designated areas of Copeland, Port of the Islands, Plantation Island, and Chokoloskee). Properties adjacent to the Traffic Congestion Area shall be considered part of the Traffic Congestion Area if their only access is to a road forming the boundary of the Area; however, if that property also has an access point to a road not forming the boundary of the Traffic the Traffic Congestion Area it will not be subject to the density reduction. Furthermore, the density reduction shall not apply to developments located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (as identified within Transportation Element, Map TR-4, and Transportation Element Policies 5.5 and 5.6, and FLUE Policy 2.4) that obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation, pursuant to the certification process described in Transportation Element Policy 5.6, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.7.7 of the Collier County land Development Code, as amended) as part of the plan of development This reduction shall likewise not be applied to developments within the Northwest and East-Central TCMAs that meet the requirements of FLUE Policies 6.1 through 6.5, and Transportation Element Policies 5.7 and 5.8, and that II FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT include Affordable Housing (as per Section 2.7.7. of the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended) as part of the plan of development. Provision Analvsis: The Traffic Congestion Area, which is depicted on the FLUM, is the only density reduction provision in the FLUE, If a proposed rezoning project is within the Traffic Congestion Area, defined as "an area identified as subject to long range traffic congestion," one dwelling unit per gross acre is deducted. The Traffic Congestion Area density reduction has existed since the GMP was adopted in ] 989. It was intended as a means of reducing long-range traffic impacts of new development within that portion of the coastal urban area that was considered to be subject to traffic congestion in the long term; due to physical and social constraints in this area, construction of new major roads and significant widening of existing roads would not be possible, However, it has not been successful in limiting density because the Density Rating System includes various density bonuses that are applicable within this area, thereby allowing the 1 DlJ/A density reduction to be counteracted, Also, many projects, especially larger ones, do not build out at their approved density; therefore the desired lower density may result without this regulatory feature. Finally, Transportation staff has since determined this density reduction is not needed. The County has adopted a "checkbook" concurrency system that, in many ways, obviates the need for the Traffic Congestion reduction factor. For these reasons, staff proposes deletion of this provision - as was previously proposed in the 2004 EAR. Also as proposed in the 2004 EAR, stafr recommends a new density reduction factor be added in place of the Traffic Congestion Area - a Coa~tal High Hazard Area (CHHA) density reduction factor for properties lying within the CHHA. The CHHA, depicted on the FLUM, is, as would be expected, more closely related to reduction of hurricane evacuation impacts, a concern for all coastal communities, Also, a C HHA density reduction factor would not be as much of a disincentive to urban infill as it would incorporate a smaller portion of the urban area - the CHHA is smaller than the Trame Congestion Area, The County recommends the Traffic Congestion Area density reduction factor be deleted and replaced with a Coastal High Hazard Area density reduction factor and so reflected on the FLUM; that correlating changes be made to all GMP references to the Traffic Congestion Area; that both the Roadway Access and Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center (residential density bands) bonuses be revised (0 replace reference to Traffic Congestion Area with CHHA reference; and, revise the Conversion of Commercial Bonus to prohibit its application within the CHHA. The Affordable-Workforce Housing Density Bonus would continue to apply within the CHHA. [Recommendation (i'om October 8, 2010 Florida Devartment ofTransvortation (FDOT) Comments to the DCA on Provosed EAR (Comment #14), "Please provide analyses to establish the impact of deleting the Traffic Congestion Area Density reduction factor and replacing it with the Coastal High Hazard Area reductionfactor. Should substantial additional development occurfrom this amendment, the department recommends that an Area Wide Traffic Study be conducted and supporting documentation provided to establish that adequate capacity will be available jCir new trips that will impact state facilities jar the long-term horizon year and short-term year 2015 conditions, " 12 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Collier County response: There are approximately 480 acres of land zoned A, Rural Agricultural that could potentially be rezoned to residential zoning districts within the area presently encompassed by the Traffic Congestion Area that would no longer be if the recommended amendment was adopted; this would yield a potential density increase of 806 dwelling units. However, it is reasonable to assume that not all of this land will be rezoned to residential zoning districts, rather some may be developed under the "A" zoning district which allows a variety of institutional uses (child care center, church, nursing home, private school, social and fraternal organizations, retail plant nursery, etc.) and essential services (fire/police/emergency medical service stations, public parks, goverrunent offices, etc.), and some may rezone to residential at a density not utilizing this amendment. Assuming a 75% rezone rate utilizing the increased density allowance, the potential density increase of the recommended amendment would be 605 DUs. Based upon property locations, these DUs could be distributed throughout the affected area, from along US 41 North near the Lee County line to east of Collier Blvd, along US 41 East. Urban Designation, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (partial excerpt) Mixed Use Activity Centers have been designated on the Future Land Use Map Series identified in the Future Land Use Element. The locations are based on intersections of major roads and on spacing criteria. When this Plan was originally adopted in 1989, there were 21 Activity Centers. There are now 19 Activity Centers, listed below, which comprise approximately 3,000 acres; this includes 3 Interchange Activity Centers (#4, 9, 10) which will be discussed separately under the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict. Two Activity Centers, #19 and 21, have been deleted as they are now within the incorporated City of Marco Island. # 1 Immokalee Road and Airport-Pulling Road # 2 US 41 and Immokalee Road # 3 Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard # 4 1-75 and Immokalee Road (Interchange Activity Center) # 5 US 41 and Vanderbilt Beach Road # 6 Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard # 7 Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard # 8 Airport-Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway # 9 1-75 and Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard (Interchange Activity Center) #101-75 and Pine Ridge Road (Interchange Activity Center) #11 Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road #12 US 41 and Pine Ridge Road #13 Airport-Pulling Road and Pine Ridge Road #14 Goodlette-Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway #15 Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Boulevard #16 US 41 and Airport-Pulling Road #17 US 41 and Rattlesnake-Hammock Road #18 US 41 and Collier Boulevard #20 US 41 and Wiggins Pass Road The Mixed-Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. Further, they are generally intended to be developed at a human-scale, to be pedestrian-oriented, and to be interconnected with abutting projects - whether commercial or residential. Street, 13 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties, where possible and practicable, are encouraged. Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, hotellmotel uses at a maximum density of 26 units per acre, community facilities, and other land uses as generally allowed in the Urban designation. The actual mix of the various land uses shall be determined during the rezoning process based on consideration of the factors listed below. Except as restricted below under the provision for Master Planned Activity Centers, all Mixed Use Activity Centers may be developed with any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict. For residential-only development, if a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict or Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, up to 16 residential units per grow acre may be permitted. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre, except as allows by the density rating system. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, eligible density shall be as allowed by that Subdistrict. For a residential-only project located partially within and partially outside of an Activity Center, the density accumulated from the Activity Center portion of the project may be distributed throughout the project. Mixed-use developments - whether consisting of residential units located above commercial uses, in an attached building, or in a freestanding building - are allowed and encouraged within Mixed Use Activity Centers. Density for such a project is calculated based upon the gross project acreage within the Activity Center. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and is not within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the eligible density is sixteen dwelling units per acre. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center that is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict but is within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, eligible density shall be as allowed by that Subdistrict. For a project located partially within and partially outside of an Activity Center, and the portion within an Activity Center is developed as mixed use, some of the density accumulated from the Activity Center portion of the project may be distributed to that portion of the project located outside of the Activity Center. In order to promote compact and walkable mixed use projects, where the density from a mixed use project is distributed outside the Activity Center boundary: (1) the mixed use component of the project within the Activity Center shall include a minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the Activity Center-accumulated density; (2) the dwelling units distributed outside the Activity Center shall be located within one third (1/3) of a mile of the Activity Center boundary; and, (3) the portion of the project within the Activity Center shall be developed at a human scale, be pedestrian-oriented, and be interconnected with the remaining portion of the project with pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Provision Analvsis: Mixed Use Activity Centers (MUAC) allow almost all land uses (industrial uses are excluded) - the full array of commercial uses, mixed use (residential and commercial), residential uses, agricultural uses, community facility uses, essential services. etc. Most MUACs allow residential-only projects at 14 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT the highest density allowed by the FLUE (16 DOl A), including most of the CHHA; the exception is those portions of MUACs within the Urban Coastal Fringe are capped at 4 DU/ A, However, mixed use projects within the CHHA are capped at 4 DU/A, Further, the allowance for 16 DU/A is in contrast with most density bonus provisions which are not applicable within the CHHA, and the remaining ones that are proposed to be revised so as not to be applicable in the CHHA, Given the longstanding and continuing concern for development, especially residential, within the CHHA, CHHA density should be consistently limited. The County recommends the allowable density for residential-only projects within the CHHA be reduced to a maximum of 4 DU/A, the same as for mixed use projects. Urban Designation, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (partial excerpt) Master Planned Activity Centers Any of the five Mixed Use Activity Centers listed below may be designated as a Master Planned Activity Center. A Master Planned Activity Center is one which has a unified plan of development in the form of a Planned Unit Development, Development of Regional Impact or an area-wide Development of Regional Impact. Property owners within such Mixed Use Activity Centers shall be required to utilize the Master Planned Activity Center process, as provided below. # 2 US 41 and Immokalee Road # 3 Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard # 5 US 41 and Vanderbilt Beach Road # 7 Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard #14 Goodlette-Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway In recognition of the benefit resulting from the coordination of planned land uses and coordinated access points to the public road network, Master Planned Activity Centers are encouraged through the allowance of flexibility in the boundaries, and thus location of uses permitted within a designated Mixed Use Activity Center. The boundaries of Master Planned Activity Centers depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series are understood to be flexible and subject to modification as provided for below. However, the acreagt;! within the reconfigured Activity Center shall not exceed that within the existing Activity Center. The actual mix of land uses shall be determined using the criteria for other Mixed Use Activity Centers. All of the following criteria must be met for a project to qualify as a Master Planned Activity Center: 1. The applicant shall have unified control of the majority of a quadrant in a designated Activity Center. Majority of the quadrant shall be defined as at least 51% of the privately owned land within any Activity Center quadrant. However, if a property owner has less than 51% ownership within a quadrant, that property owner may still request a rezoning under the provisions of a Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict subject to the maximum acreage allowed in Paragraph 2 below. Property owners with less than 51% ownership are encouraged to incorporate vehicular and pedestrian accesses with adjacent properties within the Activity Center. Any publicly owned land within the quadrant will be excluded from acreage calculations to determine unified control. 2. The allowable land uses for a Master Planned Activity Center shall be the same as for other designated Activity Centers; however, a Master Planned Activity Center encompassing the majority of the property in two or more quadrants shall be afforded the flexibility to redistribute a part or all of the allocation from one quadrant to another, to the extent of the unified control. The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #3 15 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant for a total of 160 acres maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the land area shall be limited to non- commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #7 (Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant, except that the northeast quadrant may have a total of 59 acres, for a total of 179 acres maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the land area shall be limited to non-commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. With respect to the +/- 19 acres in the northeast quadrant of Activity Center #7, said acreage lying adjacent to the east of the Hammock Park Commerce Center PUD, commercial development (exclusive of the allowed "114 mile support medical uses") shall be limited to a total of 185,000 square feet of the following uses: personal indoor self- storage facilities - this use shall occupy no greater than 50% of the total (185,000) building square feet; offices for various contractor/builder construction trade specialists inclusive of the offices of related professional disciplines and services that typically serve those construction businesses or otherwise assist in facilitating elements of a building and related infrastructure, including but not limited to architects, engineers, land surveyors and attorneys - these offices of related professional disciplines and services shall occupy no greater than 50% of the total (185,000) building square feet; warehouse space for various contractor/builder construction trades occupants; mortgage and land title companies; related businesses including but not limited to lumber and other building materials dealers, paint, glass, and wallpaper stores, garden supply stores - all as accessory uses only, accessory to offices for various contractor/builder construction trade specialists or accessory to warehouse space for various contractor/builder construction trades occupants; management associations of various types of buildings or provision of services to buildings/properties; and, fitness centers. Activity Center #14 (Goodlette-Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway) shall have a maximum of 45 acres for commercial use, the balance of the land uses shall be limited to non-commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. 3. The location and configuration of all land uses within a Master Planned Activity Center shall be compatible with and related to existing site features, surrounding development, and existing natural and manmade constraints. Commercial uses shall be oriented so as to provide coordinated and functional transportation access to major roadways serving the Activity Center, and functionally related or integrated with surrounding land uses and the planned transportation network. 4. Adjacent properties within the Activity Center that are not under the unified control of the applicant shall be considered and appropriately incorporated (i.e. pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular interconnections) into the applicant's Master Plan. Provision Analvsis: The Master Planned Activity Center provision is an example of "legislation on the fly" (it was mostly written at and during a public hearing) - it is poorly written and confusing, The County recommends this Master Planned Activity Center provision be rewritten for clarity, and possible substantive change, likely to include reorganization/restructuring of the provision, Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (select excerpts) The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is identified on Future Land Use Map. This District consists of approximately 93,600 acres, or 7% of Collier County's total land area. Significant portions of this District are adjacent to the Urban area or to the semi-rural, rapidly developing, large-lot North Golden Gate Estates platted lands. Agricultural land uses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District do not represent a significant portion of the County's active agricultural lands. As of the date of adoption of this Plan Amendment, the Rural Fringe Mixed 16 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Use District consists of more than 5,550 tax parcels, and includes at least 3,835 separate and distinct property owners. Alternative land use strategies have been developed for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in part, to consider these existing conditions. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides a transition between the Urban and Estates Designated lands and between the Urban and Agricultural/Rural and Conservation designated lands farther to the east. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District employs a balanced approach, including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property rights, providing for large areas of open space, and allowing, in designated areas, appropriate types, density and intensity of development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District allows for a mixture of urban and rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and sewer, schools, recreational facilities, commercial uses and essential services deemed necessary to serve the residents of the District. In order to preserve existing natural resources, including habitat for listed species, to retain a rural, pastoral, or park-like appearance from the major public rights-of-way within this area, and to protect private property rights, the following innovative planning and development techniques are required and/or encouraged within the District. ... ... ... ... *.. ... break ... ... ... *.* ... ... Sending Lands: Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. 7. Perroitted Uses: Perroitted uses are limited to the following: a) Agricultural uses consistent with Chapter 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farro Act) b) Detached single-family dwelling units, including mobile homes where the Mobile Home Zoning Overlay exists, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 40 acres or one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of less than 40 acres, which existed on or before June 22, 1999. For the purpose of this provision, a lot or parcel which is deemed to have been in existence on or before June 22, 1999 is 1) a lot or parcel which is part of a subdivision recorded in the public records of Collier County, Florida; or 2) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries, described by metes and bounds or other specific legal description, the description of which has been recorded in the public records of Collier County Florida on or before June 22,1999; or 3) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries, for which an agreement for deed was executed prior to June 22, 1999. c) Habitat preservation and conservation uses. d) Passive parks and other passive recreational uses. e) Sporting and Recreational camps, within which the lodging component shall not exceed 1 unit per 5 gross acres. f) Essential Services necessary to serve perroitted uses identified in Section 5.a) through 5.e) such as the following: private wells and septic tanks; utility lines, except sewer lines; sewer lines and lift stations, only if located within non-NRPA Sending Lands, and only if located within already cleared portions of existing rights-of-way or easements, and if necessary to serve the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District; and, water pumping stations necessary to serve the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District. g) Essential Services necessary to ensure public safety. h) Oil and gas exploration. Where practicable, directional-drilling techniques and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native habitats. 17 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 8. Conditional Uses: a) The following uses are conditionally permitted subject to approval through a public hearing process: (1) Essential services not identified above in 4f). Within one year, Collier County will review essential services currently allowed in the Land Development Code and will define those uses intended to be conditionally permitted in Sending designated lands. During this one-year period or if necessary until a comprehensive plan amendment identifying conditionally permitted essential services, no conditional uses for essential services within Sending designated lands shall be approved. (2) Public facilities, including solid waste and resource recovery facilities, and public vehicle and equipment storage and repair facilities, shall be permitted within Section 25, Township 49S, Range 26E, on lands adjacent to the existing County landfill. This shall not be interpreted to allow for the expansion of the landfill into Section 25 for the purpose of solid waste disposal. (3) Commercial uses accessory to permitted uses 4.a), 4.c) and 4.d), such as retail sales of produce accessory to farming, or a restaurant accessory to a park or preserve, so long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. *** *** *** *** *** *** break *** *** *** *** *** *** Exemptions from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Development Standards _ The requirements of this District shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses. Existing uses shall include: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or projects for which a Conditional use or Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, land use petitions for which a completed application has been submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with or clearly ancillary to the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies and for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity. Provision Analvsis: The RFMUD - its allowance of uses, TOR program, etc. - was created to apply to lands zoned A, Rural Agricultural. However, there are some lands with non-A zoning, including GC, Golf Course; TTRVC, Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle; PUD, Planned Unit Development; VR, Village Residential; MH, Mobile Home; RSF-3, Residential Single Family; C-2, Convenience Commercial; and, C-3, Intermediate Commercial. For some of these non-A zoning districts, to allow or only allow the uses and densities of the RFMUD would be in conflict with the underlying zoning district and would grant additional uses not allowed by underlying zoning or prohibit uses that are allowed by underlying zoning (e,g. RFMUD Neutral Lands would allow residential and agricultural uses whereas C-2 doesn't allow those uses and would not allow commercial uses whereas C-2 allows various commercial uses), To apply the RFMUD regulations to non-A zoning would not only open the County to potential Bert Harris Act claims, it just wouldn't make sense - the uses of the RFMUD do not correlate to the development standards of the non-A zoning districts, Similarly, to apply the TOR program to non-A zoned lands is nonsensical. 18 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The RFMUD Sending Lands originally included only the provision for base TDR credits, However, via a subsequent GMP amendment, various bonus credits were added, However, in doing so, the necessary correlating renumbering of cross-references within subparagraphs 7,f. and 8.a.(I) and (3) did not occur (to change "5" to "7" and "4" to "7," respectively), The "Exemption" provision at the end of the RFMUD is a grandfathering provision for existing uses. Part of that provision allows for the expansion of existing uses ("The continuation of existing uses shall include expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with or clearly ancillary to the existing uses."), This language needs to be revised so as to clearly reflect the intent to allow for on- site expansion, not expansion onto lands not part of the existing use. Also, the title of this provision incorrectly refers to development standards whereas the provision itself applies to the RFMUD in its entirety . The County recommends the RFMUD be revised to clarify that it only applies to A-zoned lands; to correct a miss-numbering from a past amendment to the RFMUD Sending Lands designation; and, to clarify the applicability of "expansion" and delete unneeded text from the Exemption provision title. Overlays and Special Features, Coastal High Hazard Area Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA boundary is depicted on the Future land Use Map; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. New rezones to permit mobile home development shall not be allowed within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA. Provision Analvsis: Certain provisions within the FLUE, e.g, Density Rating System density bonuses and proposed density reduction factor, specifically do/do not apply within the CHHA. Likewise, certain Objectives and Policies of other Elements have specific applicability to the CHHA, This provision remains valid and should be retained as written, [Comment from the Florida Deoartment of Communitv Affairs' October 15, 2010 Letter on the Prooosed EAR (oarai!Jaoh 61: "The proposed EAR does not sufficiently address Section 163,3191 (2)(m), FS Collier County has coastal high hazard area; however, the proposed EAR does not include an evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the coastal high hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs, and include in such an evaluation the identification of strategies to address redevelopment and the rights of affected residents balanced against public safety considerations, The E-"AR should be revised to include the evaluation, " Collier County response: Collier County has not required a density reduction in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) since the last (2004) EAR. Further, FLUE Policies 5.1 and 5,9-5,12, and related Consistent by Policy Maps, allow for development and redevelopment - including within the CHHA - in accordance with zoning on the identified properties. And, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay in the FLUE, and on the FLUM, is almost entirely within the CHHA; that Overlay allows for a density increase on eligible properties therein via reallocation of density. 19 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Objective 3 and Policies in the Capital Improvement Element imposes limitations on the expenditure of public funds within the CHHA, but allows for provision of public infrastructure necessary to serve population density as allowed by the FLUE, Future Land Use Map and Map Series The Future Land Use Map includes a depiction of the CHHA. Provision Analvsis: The CHHA is described in CCME Policy 12.2,5, The definition of the CHHA in Florida Statutes changed in 2006 but that Policy has not been revised, Any necessary change to CHHA boundary description in CCME policy 12,2,5 needs to be reflected on the FLUM. The County recommends any changes to the CHHA boundary made in CCME Policy 12.2,5 be reflected on the FLUM depiction of the CHHA boundary, Future Land Use Map and Map Series The Future Land Use Map Series includes a depiction of properties in the Immokalee Area that are deemed Consistent By Policy. Provision Analvsis: This map depicts properties within the Immokalee Area Master Plan boundary that were previously determined to be consistent with the FLUE pursuant to policies under Goal 5 of the FLUE. The lmmokalee Area Master Plan is being amended (petition CP-2008-5) which is expected to result in fewer future land use nonconforrnities - properties with cxisting zoning that does not conform to the future land use_designation, The lAMP will include a new Policy 6,1.9 that is the replacement of FLUE Policy 5,1 for the Immokalee area; that new policy will make reference to these nonconforming properties. A new map will be prepared for adoption into the lAMP depicting these nonconforming properties that are deemed consistent by policy; this will replace the present Consistent By Policy Map for Immokalec, The County recommends this map be deleted; a replacemcnt map will be adopted into the lAMP, Planning Horizon Issue Provision Analvsis: The FLUM is labeled 2006-2016; future transportation maps are labeled 2025; other planning and/or infrastructure programs have different timelines, There is a need to align the planning horizon within the GMP, The 2007-2008 combined cycles ofGMP amendments, scheduled to be adopted on July 28, 2010, includes an amendment to add a new Policy 4,11 in the FLUE, as follows: In the next Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), due January I, 2011, Collier County will identify as an issue to be addressed, the need to align dates within the various elements of this growth management plan. This will include, but may not be limited to, the planning time frame for the Future Land Use Map, the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, and Transportation Element long range maps. Necessary amendments to achieve the alignment of dates will be included in the EAR-based amendments to the Plan, 20 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The County recommends revising the various planning horizons to be consistent, perhaps 2025. Designation/District/Subdistrict Relationship Provision Analvsis: Both the Urban and Agricultural/Rural Designations contain multiple Districts and Subdistricts. Various uses are allowed under the Designation that mayor may not be allowed under each subsequent District or Subdistrict though this is not always readily discemable, The County recommends clarification of the relationship between Designations, Districts and Subdistricts; this may necessitate restructuring parts of the Designation Description section of the FLUE. EAR Bee. FLUE Assessment of GO?, 1-6-11 21 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 4B S T 49 S T 50 S T 51 S T 52 S T 53 S i'i,i 'j I '~I , I,; ",' I:'. ~; : ~ .,~" ~ ~ ~ ~ i , ~i ~~ <~I o ;; ~i ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~ '.' ~I . I :~r"'" N ~ ~ , 0 I c l' I 0 I ~ !... , <, I: ~I .J:_! '5. N ~ ti ~ i ;;; !~ ~ .; ,..", ./,/""" .' /I... .+_..- t'.:':'. I ,~ IN !c: ll; " ~ N !~ jcn =1 I -,, __~nJ 1/...- m N I~ , ~ ~ Cl. c( :E ! } Uol . ~ III 'C :;:) .~ W < u: < Q '" < ~ 0 < < S , " Z < 0 ~ i5 0 " c( U ~ " , 0 2 2 ..... ~ 2 0 w 0 ~ <3 " Uol u IX: ~ :;:) , < , I- :;:) u. I)I;~ :I\.::,~'(~i" , ~"'-l,,;j~ ~-^". ~~.' /,"'i:~!~C('Xl ,', ;;':Y-(~' ~/, '~p ~ ~ :e co N ~ " I-,~"'" '" co co N , ,~ I 0, I '-'", , S Sf 1 S &t ,'t S H 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 [S 1 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Master Plan will be revised to reflect the proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with "TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE. Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect". Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Master Plan's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote...", "The County shall continue to..." or 'The District shall expand..." or similar phrases. Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction, Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Master Plan should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes, Goal I - reformatting; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Objectives and Policies. Objective 1.1 - reformatting. Policy 1,1.4 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identify a specific land area and treat it differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain as written Policy 1.1.5 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete. Policy 1,1.6 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, relocate or reformat. Policy 1,1.8 - review for accuracy regarding references to maps located elsewhere, Policies found in other GMP Elements, and adoption dates of referenced documents; then, revise as necessary or retain as written, Policy 1,2,2 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to identify another specific activity able to benefit from alternative financing, and re-emphasize balanced transportation planning efforts - in part or entirely. Policy 1.2.4 - reformatting. Objective 1.3 - reformatting, 1 GGAMP SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 1.3.I - minor revisions to provide new departmental references. Objective 1.4 - reformatting, Policy 1.4, I - defer consideration of suggested revisions to expand to ensure comprehensive and uniform application ofLDC. Goal 2 - reformatting Objective 2, I - defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identify a specific land area and treat it differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain as written; reformatting. Policy 2,1,1 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable. Policy 2,],2 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to re-identify a specific land area and treat it differently in these provisions; then, revise as necessary or retain with minor revision to update terminology, Policy 2,].3 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable, Policy 2,1.4 defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable, Objective 2.2 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to show remaining efforts following major project completion; reformatting, Policy 2,2,] defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable. Policy 2,2,2 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete, as no longer applicable; review for accuracy regarding references to LDC or Statutory cites,; then, revise as necessary or retain as written. Goal 3 - reformatting, Objective 3,1 - defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting, Goal 4 - reformatting, Objective 4,] refoffilatting, Policy 4,],1 defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date- specific task. Policy 4,],2 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date- specific task, Policy 4.1.3 - defer consideration of suggested revisions to delete mandate to complete a date- specific task, 2 GGAMP SUMMAR Y OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Goal 5 - reformatting. Objective 5,1 - consider minor revision to show use of existing resource; revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policy; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Policy 5,1,1 - defer consideration of suggested revision to show use of existing resource; revisions to better support its Objective; reformatting, Objective 5,2 - minor revision to be more inclusive of jurisdictions under the Plan; reformatting. Policy 5.2.1 - minor revision for clarity; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Policy 5,2.2 - revisions to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task; consider minor revision to show use of existing MPO resource; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Policy, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely. Policy 5,2.3 - minor revision to show remaining efforts following major project completion. Objective 5.3 reformatting. defer consideration of suggested revision to show use of existing resource; Policy 5.3.2 - minor revision to strengthen preservation efforts, Goal 6 - defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Goal, and its subsequent Objectives and Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting. Objective 6.1 - defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; revisions to illustrate expanded planning efforts for more mobility options; reformatting. Policy 6,1,1 - minor revision to illustrate expanded planning eJforts; reformatting. Policy 6,1,2 - minor revision to reflect continuing efforts between agencies. Objective 6.2 - defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; revisions to this Objective and its subsequent Policies addressing development of route alternatives for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area; reformatting. Policy 6.2.4 - revisions to strengthen the connection with Transportation Policy 7,1 and develop different urban and rural standards and criteria. Objective 6.3 - revisions to this Objective and its subsequent Policies addressing development of route alternatives for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area; reformatting. 3 GGAMP SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Policy 6,3,] - defer consideration of suggested revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task, Policy 6.3.2 - minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Goal 7 - reformatting. Objective 7,1 - reformatting, Policy 7.1.3 - revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task. Objective 7,2 - reformatting. Policy 7,2,1 - minor revision. Policy 7,2.2 - minor revision to eliminate duplication of activities, Objective 7,3 - re-state to capture essence of subsequent Policies; defer consideration of suggested modification to strengthen this Objective and its subsequent Policies, in demonstrating support for reducing VMT and GHG emissions - in part or entirely; reformatting, Policy 7.3,1 - minor revision to illustrate expanded planning efforts, Policy 7.3,2 - review for accuracy regarding references to adoption dates of referenced documents; then, revise as necessary or retain as written, Policy 7,3.4 - minor revision to delete mandate to complete a date-specific task, GGAMP - Assessment of Select Provisions - Estates - Mixed Use District: Conditional Uses Subdistrict - revision to encompass all essential services uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area and expand the referenced zoning district listed to encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates, Estates - Commercial District: Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict - revision to replace the term "shopping center" with reference to C-2 uses, -I GGAMP SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Assessment of the Successes & Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Golden Gate Area Master Plan A. Introduction & Background: The purpose of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan is defilled within its seven Goals (Goal 1 through Goal 7), which read as follows: GOAL 1: TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING WHILE BALANCING THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan is an "optional element" of the Collier County Growth Management Plan under Section 163.3177(7), Florida Statutes. As such, there are no specific criteria to guide the format and purposes of this Element. The Golden Gate Master Plan was originally developed, as mandated by (1988) Policy 4,1 of the Future land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. As currently formatted, this Master Plan Element consists entirely of seven Goals, and their supporting Objectives and Policies. This Goal should be retained, essentially as written. This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS, WHILE BALANCING THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH CONCERNS TO PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES. Revise as necessary capture what follows in Objectives and Policies, B. Objectives Analysis: OBJECTIVE 1.1: Unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. Standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts are identified in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to follow other portions of the Master Plan when considering land use changes and issuing development orders. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", and structurally followed with a Policy or Policies that provide the specific direction. 1 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Policv Relevance: There are eight (8) policies within this Objective, Policy 1.1.4: Overlays and Special Features shall include: A. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Overlay This Policy should be retained as written. {Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25, 2alO EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan Consideration fiH any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 201I).] Policy 1.1.5 Conditional Use requests within Golden Gate Estates shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. This Policy is not relevant and should be deleted, As with other Districts and Subdistricts, the Conditional Uses Subdistrict itself contains the provisions necessary to regulate conditional uses in the Golden Gate Estates area, {Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUi!ust 25, 2alO EAR WorkshoD'- Suggesting that the Master Plan is structured somewhat differently than the FLUE or the lAMP and the preposition that this Policy is irrelevant may not he entire~v accurate, Change to this Policy is untimely and consideration for any such change should he deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision] Policy 1.1.6 To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. This Policy reflects the type of provision usually found in regulatory documents, such as the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), and should be transitioned there. Until such change takes place, this Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but rewritten, This Policy should be restructured to improve its formatting as a provision or regulation, perhaps as part of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict itself {Plannini! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25, 2a1a EAR Workshop. Suggesting that the Master Plan is structured somewhat differently than the FLUE or the 1AMP, Change to this Policy is untimely and consideration fhr any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20] I) and should be removedfrom the! as a proposed revision] 2 GOLDEN GA TE AREA MASTER PLAN Policy 1.1.8: The sites containing existing public educational plants and ancillary plants, and the undeveloped sites owned by the Collier County School Board for future public educational plants and ancillary plants, within the GGAMP area, are depicted on the Future land Use Map Series in the countywide FLUE and on the Public School Facilities Element Map Series, and referenced in FLUE Policy 5.14 and Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.2.6. All of these sites are subject to the generallnterlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. All future educational plants and ancillary plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as set forth in FLUE Policy 5.14. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained as written OBJECTIVE 1.2: Ensure public facilities are provided at an acceptable level of service. Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective. Policy 1.2.2: The Collier County Transportation Department shall continue to explore alternative financing methods to accelerate paving of lime-rock roads in the Estates. This Policy, as presently written, is not entirely relevant. The County's transportation planning for the Estates does not intend to accelerate efforts for improving lime-rock roads, but seeks to find a balance among all transportation improvements. The County continues to meet levels of service ip the Estates in adherence to its improvement schedule and no acceleration of improvement activities is necessary - even if additional financing methods are in place, This Objective should be retained, given the removal of any reference to "accelerate" road-paving activities in the Estates, This Policy should also be expanded to identifY another activity for which alternative financing methods should be explored - that is, for the relocation of public utilities located along the edges of rights-of-way, where widening or other road projects so dictate, At present, such relocation projects are financed by gas tax proceeds that could be better used elsewhere, and be made available for paving lime-rock roads or other purposes, [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!ust 25. 2010 EAR Work~hov - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removedfrom the! as a proposed revision.] Policy 1.2.4: Due to the continued use of individual septic systems and private wells within a densely platted urban area, the Florida Governmental Utilities Authority, or its successor, is 3 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN encouraged to expand their sewer and water service area to include all of that area known as Golden Gate City at the earliest possible time. This Policy encourages a private utility provider to expand their services to serve all of Golden Gate City. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. This Policy should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "policy", OBJECTIVE 1.3: The County shall continue to protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to protect and preserve the natural resources in accordance with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area; followed by a "policy", such as: Policy 1.3.0.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Golden Gate area in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policv Relevance: There is one (I) Policy within this Objective, Policy 1.3.1: The Collier County Environmental Services Department shall coordinate its planning and permitting activities within the Golden Gate Area with all other applicable environmental planning, permitting and regulatory agencies to ensure that all Federal, State and local natural resource protection regulations are being enforced. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. The referenced department title should be revised to be current. OBJECTIVE 1.4: Through the enforcement of the Land Development Code and the housing and building codes, Collier County shall continue to provide a living environment within the Golden Gate Area, which is aesthetically acceptable and enhances quality of life. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to provide an aesthetically acceptable and quality of life enhancing jiving environment within the Golden Gate Area, This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Provide a living 4 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN environment within the Golden Gate area, which is aesthetically acceptable and enhances the quality of life; followed by a "policy", such as: Policy 1.4.0.1: Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and enhances the quality of life through the enforcement of the Land Development Code and the housing and building codes. Policv Relevance: There is one (1) Policy within this Objective, Policy 1.4.1: The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code to control illegal storage of machinery, vehicles, and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Golden Gate Area. This Policy targets a small set of potential violations, thus implying that only the illegal storage of certain items and illegal operation of business ventures affect the Estates aesthetically or diminish the quality oflife. It is more likely, however, that the living environment is effected by other development, uses and activities, This Policy remains relevant nonetheless, and should be expanded to consider other historical and probable enforcement issues. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removedfrom the! as a proposed revision.] GOAL 2: THE COUNTY RECOGNIZES THAT THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES PROJECT (SGGE), AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM, THAT AREA WHICH L:.IES SOUTH OF STATE ROAD 84 TO US 41, IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT. This Goal includes outdated locational and project references, and should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (EAST TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. OBJECTIVE 2.1: Public infrastructure improvements shall be guided by the following policies: Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to follow specific Policies in making public infrastructure improvements. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Provide public infrastructure improvements in the area lying 5 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN south of 1-75 (Alligator Alley) to US 41 (East Trail) in accordance with the guidance provided by the Picayune Strand Restoration Project; followed by a "policy", such as: Policy 2.0.1.: Collier County shall guide public infrastructure improvements in the Southern Golden Gate Estates area by the following policies. ff'lanninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment (rom AUl!ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshoo - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan. Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2(11) and should be removedfrom the/ as a proposed revision.} Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective, Policy 2.1.1: Minimal road maintenance to include traffic signage, right-of-way mowing and road surface patchinglgrading will continue. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted SGGE roads were turned over to SFWMD several years ago by the BCC [Planninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!wit 25. 2010 EAR Workshoo - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan. Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removedfrom the! as a proposed revision] Policy 2.1.2: Consistent with the Public Facilities Element, public water and sewer facilities shall not be expanded into SGGE. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written, The term "sewer" should be replaced with "wastewater" in accordance with similar revisions made to certain Sub-Elements of the Public Facilities Element. [Planninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment from Auzust 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part (If Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan. Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2(11) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.} Policy 2.1.3: Special taxing districts associated with infrastructure improvements shall not be created for or expanded into SGGE. This Objective is no longer relevant and should be deleted All land in SGGE is owned by the State, 6 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN [PlanninfI Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUfIust 25, 2010 EAR WorkshofJ - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removedfrom the/ as a proposed revision] Policy 2.1.4 The County shall apply Chapter 28-25, FAC., "Boundary and Regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern" to those Golden Gate Estates units located within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted SGGE lands have been purchased by the State, [PlanninfI Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUfIust 25, 2010 EAR WorkshofJ - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removedfrom the/ as a proposed revision} OBJECTIVE 2.2: In order to further its goal of protecting this area of special environmental sensitivity, the County will coordinate with DEP in an effort to assist the State's acquisition of privately owned property within SGGE to the extent consistent with the recognition of existing private property rights. Obiective Achievement AnaIvsis: The above Objective requires the County to coordinate with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in State efforts to acquire property. Properties in SGGE have been purchased and this Objective, along with its subsequent Policies, should be revised to reflect what remains of the County s coordination efforts, or involvement. with the Picayune Strand Restoration Project, This Objective should also be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Coordinate with the U.S Army Corps of Engineers to protect the area of special environmental sensitivity within SGGE. [PlanninfI Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUi..'Ust 25, 2010 EAR WorkshofJ - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removedfrom the! as a proposed revision} Policv Relevance: There are two (2) Policies within this Objective 7 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Policy 2.2.1 : The County shall direct inquiries and make information available regarding options for the sale or donation of land to the State, or other inquiries regarding acquisition, to the Florida DEP, Bureau of land Acquisition's designee, as provided by DEP. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted or revised. All land in SGGE has been purchased by the State. [Planninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUl!ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshov ~ Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan Consideration for any such change should be deferred unti/taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20JI) and should be removedfrom the! as a proposed revision] Policy 2.2.2: Collier County shall continue to implement a system for reviewing applications for development in SGGE, which will include the following procedures: A. Notice to the DEP's Bureau of land Acquisition of the application within 5 days of receipt. B. Notice to the applicant of DEP's acquisition program, the lack of public infrastructure and the proposed restoration program for the area. C. Within the notice of DEP's acquisition program, the applicant shall be encouraged to contact DEP's Bureau of land Acquisition to determine and negotiate whether DEP intends to purchase the applicant's property at fair market value. D. Prior to the processing of an application for development approval, the applicant shall provide to the County proof of coordination with DEP. Upon execution of a contract for sale, the application shall be placed in abeyance pending completion of the purchase by DEP. E. The County shall review the environmental impacts of the application in order to minimize said impact. F. The County shall apply Section 4.02.14, Development Standards and Regulations for ACSC-ST of the County's land Development Code or Chapter 28-25, Florida Administrative Code, "Boundary and Regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern". whichever is stricter. G. The County shall provide a maximum review and processing time of 180 days from the date of commencement of the application procedures before any development permits are issued. This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted or revised. All land in SGGE is owned by the State and the restoration project is being implemented by the Us. Army Corps of Engineers. [Planninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!ust 25. 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that Southern Golden Gate Estates is now part of Picayune Strand State Forest and may now be treated differently in this Master Plan Consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up 8 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removedfrom the/ as a proposed revision.] GOAL 3: PROVIDE FOR BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. This GOjll should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO PROVIDE FOR BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: The placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates shall meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates- Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to designate and place Neighborhood Centers in accordance with criteria found in this Master Plan. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Meet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates-Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697. [Public Comment (rom Februarv 23. 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! .- Suggesting that commercial development in the interior of the Estates is not consistent with this Master Plan; Interior commercial activities/uses were intended to be small scale/small magnitude, while peripheral commercial activities/uses were intended to be larger in scale and magnitude.] [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment (rom AUi!.Ust 25. 2010 EAR WorhhotJ - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be def'erred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the/ as a proposed revision. Consideration should be given to clarifY the differences between the use of the term "rural" and the term "rural residential".] GOAL 4: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING EFFORTS WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY SHALL SEEK TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE LOCAL RESIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. 9 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES THAT PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE LOCAL RESIDENTS WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall focus on the provIsion of residential and commercial land uses that meets the needs of the surrounding area. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area in the development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City; followed by a "policy", such as: Policy 4.0.1.: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs ofthe surrounding area. Policv Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective, Policy 4.1.1: By 2006, Collier County shall develop an implementation schedule for the creation of a community-planning program for Golden Gate City. The implementation schedule shall take into consideration the following issues: a) Affordable housing based upon home ownership; b) Commercial re-vitalization, to include: i. Sidewalks ii. Traffic calming measures iii. Improved street lighting; c) Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; d) Crime reduction; e) Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, f) Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. This Policy requires the County to develop a schedule for creating a Golden Gate City community planning program, Although Golden Gate City is part of a decades-old master planned community, this Golden Gate Area Master Plan and of the FLUE, this Policy remains relevant to the extent that it supports a community planning program, The date reference should be deleted This Policy should also be re-writlen to remove the County as the initiating entity mandated with this task. The private sector has a better understanding of the issues identified and, ability to organize and initiate such a task among these stakeholders. 10 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 25. 2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.] Policy 4.1.2: By 2006, Collier County shall begin to examine, by holding community meetings, the feasibility of establishing neighborhood-based planning programs within Golden Gate City that focus on the unique or distinct features of the different portions of the community. While focusing on distinct areas within the community, such neighborhood planning efforts as may be established shall not neglect Golden Gate City as a whole. This Policy requires the County to determine the feasibility of establishing neighborhood-based planning programs in creating a Golden Gate City community planning program. This Policy remains relevant to the extent that it supports examining optional elements of a community planning program. As with the Policy above, the date reference should be deleted. This Policy should also be re-written to remove the County as the initiating entity mandated with this task The private sector has a better understanding of the "neighborhoods" involved and, ability to organize and initiate such a task among these neighborhoods. [flanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25. 2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.] Policy 4.1.3: By 2006, Collier County shall examine the feasibility of crafting land development regulations specific to the Golden Gate City community. Such regulations shall focus on the unique circumstances of this community. This Policy requires the County to determine the feasibility of creating Golden Gate City community- specific development regulations. Although Golden Gate City is part of a decades-old master planned community and platted Subdivision, this Golden Gate Area Master Plan, the FLUE and the LDC, this Policy remains relevant to the extent that it supports examining aspects of County regulations that may recognize the unique circumstances of the community. As with the Policy above, the date reference should be deleted. This Policy should also be re-written to remove the County as the initiating entity mandated with this /ask The private sector has a better understanding of the "development regulations" that may be cause for retaining this Policy and, ability to organize and initiate such a task - perhaps as part of the undertaking described in Policies 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 above. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUf!ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.] GOAL 5: FUTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES WILL BALANCE THE DESIRE BY RESIDENTS FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITH THE PRESERVATION OF THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, LOW-DENSITY JJ GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND liMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO BALANCE THE DESIRE FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITH THE PRESERVATION OF THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. OBJECTIVE 5.1: By 2006, the Collier County land Development Code shall be amended to provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to amend the LDC to allow commercial development in Neighborhood Centers located in Golden Gates Estates. LDC provisions allow for commercial development in these Neighborhood Centers. Any restudy efforts of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan undertaken in the future should pursue specific studies to ensure any new commercial land uses considered are consistent with the Goals and Objectives of this Master Plan to preserve the area's rural character, In determining whether new commercial uses are appropriate or inappropriate and whether the desired rural characteristics may be compromised or diminished, the County should refer to Toward Better Places - The Communitv Character Plan for Collier Countv. Florida. The Community Character Plan provides the County with a policy document featuring the most useful aspects of traditional neighborhood design (TND), smart growth, new urbanism and other contemporary planning practices, Objective 7 and its Policies 7.1 through 7,7, of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) were approved on October 26, 2004 by the Board of County Commissioners in early efforts to incorporate certain "Smart Growth" provisions into the FLUE. The Community Character Plan is a more valuable resource however, and stands to provide the relevant information and useful direction needed to preserve the Golden Gate Estates area's rural character. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697, This Objective should be revised to identifY The Communitv Character Plan as a resource and to consider making full use of it in future planning effiJrls in the Golden Gate Estates area, and rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", [Public Comment from February 23. 2010 EAR Public Meeting - Suggesting that commercial development in the interior of the Estates [outside of this context] is not consistent with this Master Plan; Interior commercial activities/uses were intended to he small scale/small magnitude, while peripheral commercial activities/uses were intended to he larger in scale and magnitude.] [Planning Commission (CCPC) Comment from August 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should he deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should 12 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN be removed from the! as a proposed revision. Consideration should be given to clarifY the differences between the use of the term "rural" and the term "rural residential".] Policv Relevance: There is a single (I) Policy within this Objective. Policy 5.1.1: Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting within Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall apply the following standards: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. 1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. c. This Policy shall not apply to Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12, Golden Gate Estates, located in the southwest quadrant of the Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards Neighborhood Center. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained and should be expanded, This Policy offers LDC- type standards for street, recreational and structure lighting within Golden Gate Estates as the single planning idea for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. As with Objective 5,1 above, this Policy will benefit from incorporating more of the Communitv Character Plan as a resource, Any modifications should not negatively affect the exception provided by subsection "c" above. [PlanninfI Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUfIust 25, 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the/ as a proposed revision.] 13 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN OBJECTIVE 5.2: The provision of public infrastructure shall be balanced with the need to preserve the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to give consideration to the rural character of the Estates in their planning of public infrastructure. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Balance the provision of public infrastructure with the need to preserve the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. Because there are both public and private utilities planned or provided in the rural areas of Golden Gate Estates, this Objective could also be revised to affect the planning and provision of all infrastructures, Policv Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective, Policy 5.2.1: Future road and bridge improvements in Golden Gate Estates shall not only provide for safety and reasonable mobility, but shall also contribute to the rural character of the area. Transportation improvements shall be designed in context with their setting. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. The fundamental meaning of this Policy is intended to be caoital road and bridxe improvements, yet this meaning may be misinterpreted ji-om its present format, Add language to clarifY. {Public Comment from Februarv 23, 20W EAR Public Aleetin!!. Sugxesting that future improvements include more bridges to reduce fuel consumption and improve safety; Bridging waterways, in this context, is preferred over widening roads to -4 or 6 lanes to reduce miles traveled] {Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25. 20IO tAR Workshop Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HE 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2(11) and should be removed ji-om the! as a proposed revision. Consideration should be given to clarifY the differences between the use of the term "rural" and the term "rural residential".} POlicy 5.2.2: The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The first segment of greenway shall be in place by 2006. The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths which allow people to move about the Estates Area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within existing or future public rights-of-way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. 14 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN This Policy requires the County to develop a network of greenways in the Estates. In planning this network of greenway corridors, the County should refer to Toward Better Places - The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida. The Community Character Plan provides the County with a policy document featuring the most useful aspects of traditional neighborhood design (TND), smart growth, new urbanism and other contemporary planning practices. Objective 7 and its Policies 7.1 through 7,7, of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) were approved on October 26, 2004 by the Board of County Commissioners in early efforts to incorporate certain "Smart Growth" provisions into the FLUE. The Community Character Plan is a more valuable resource however, and stands to provide the relevant information and useful direction needed to develop this network of greenways in the Golden Gate Estates area. This Policy should be revised to provide a connection with the MPO in these planning efforts, and to ensure consistency with the MPO s Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance of HB 697. This Policy should be revised to identify The Communitv Character Plan as a resource and to consider makingfull use ofit in future planning efforts in the Golden Gate Estates area, This Policy should also be revised to identifY entirely different, or additional, County entities that may be more suited to carrying out such a program - by another chosen date, [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!Ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the/ as a proposed revision} Policy 5,2.3: Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment This Policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. The "planned" 1-75 interchange is completed and this planning reference should be deleted. OBJECTIVE 5.3: By 2006, the Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended, as necessary, so as to provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. These provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, and the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low-density residential development 15 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective requires the County - as a Policy requirement would - to amend the LDC to allow rural amenities in Golden Gates Estates. LDC provisions do this, Any restudy efforts of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan undertaken in the future should pursue specific studies to ensure any rural-type amenities or land uses considered are consistent with the Goals and Objectives of this Master Plan to preserve the area's rural character, In determining whether uses are appropriate or inappropriate and whether the desired rural characteristics may be compromised or diminished, the County should refer to Toward Better Places _ The Communi tv Character Plan for Collier County. Florida, The Community Character Plan provides the County with a policy document featuring the most useful aspects of traditional neighborhood design (TN D), smart growth, new urbanism and other contemporary planning practices. Objective 7 and its Policies 7.1 through 7.7, of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) were approved on October 26, 2004 by the Board of County Commissioners in early efforts to incorporate certain "Smart Growth" provisions into the FLUE, The Community Character Plan is a more valuable resource however, and stands to provide the relevant information and useful direction needed to preserve the Golden Gate Estates area's rural character, This Objective should be revised to identifY The Communitv Character Plan as a resource and to consider makingfull use ofil infilture planning efforts in the Golden Gate Estates area, and rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective". [Planninl! Commission (CCPC) Comment kom AUl!Ust 25. 2010 EAR WorkshoD - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision. Consideration should be given to clarifY the differences between the use of the term "rural" and the term "rural residential ",] Policy Relevance: There are two (2) policies within this Objective, Policy 5.3.2: The Land Development Code shall continue to allow the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Estates Area. This Policy is irrelevant and should be strengthened to encourage preservation efforts, not just allow them, GOAL 6: FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA SHALL PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES. The above Goal provides for improving the roadway network throughout the Golden Gate area while preserving its rural characteristics in the Estates areas, Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697, 16 GOLDf.N GATE AREA MASTER PLAN This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal", such as, TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA. [Public Comment from Februarv 23, 2010 EAR Public Meetinz - Suggesting that it is preferable, in this context, to divert traffic around the Estates rather than through it} [Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment from Auzust 25, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HE 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removedfrom the/ as a proposed revision} OBJECTIVE 6.1: The Collier County Transportation Division will continue to increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area's rural character. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective provides for the preservation of the rural character of the Estates and the consideration of neighborhood traffic safety in planning for the improvements to the roadway network throughout the Golden Gate area, The number of route alternatives for traffic is limited by physical obstacles, fiscal constraints or other impediments, and increases cannot be continued indefinitely. This Objective should be revised to reflect an understanding that limited opportunities for new corridors will not allow a continuing increase in developing alternative routes, while bridges, interconnections and other improvements to existing corridors will provide for the safe and efficient movement of traffic, This Objective should also be expanded to introduce the planning for and development of mass transit and the full spectrum of mobility options, In doing so, the priorities set forth in the below Policies will be reconsidered to reflect a balance among increasing route alternatives, enhancing roadway interconnection and, introducing and enhancing mobility options - all consistent with the preservation ofthe area's rural character. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Improve existing routes, develop mobility options, and increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both east-west and north-south directions, consistent with traffic safety and efficiency considerations, and consistcnt with the preservatiou of the area's rural character. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697, 17 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN !!,ublic Comment tram Februarv 23, 2010 EAR Public Meetinz.- Suggesting that it is preferable, in this context, to divert traffic around the Estates rather than through it.} !!,lanninz Commission (CCPC) Comment tram Auzust 25, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20Il) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision Consideration should be given to clarify the differences between the use of the term "rural" and the term "rural residential ".} Policv Relevance: There are two (2) policies within this Objective, Policy 6.1.1: In planning to increase the number of route alternatives through the Estates Area, the Collier County Transportation Division will prioritize the following routes over other alternatives: a. The extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road from its current terminus to DeSoto Boulevard. b. The development of a north-south connection from the eastern terminus of White Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. c. The development of a new east-west roadway crossing the Estates Area south of Golden Gate Boulevard. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance of HB 697, Additional route alternatives are planned in Golden Gate Eftates by the East of 951 Bridge Program, The Program should be identijied as a new item "d" on the list above. This Policy may be revised to clarify that the a-b-c order of the items listed does not in itself imply the priority of one listing over another. No prioritization is implied or should be inferredfrom the order of the items listed [Public Comment fi'om Februarv 23,2010 EAR Public Meetinz - Suggesting that future improvements include more bridges to reduce fuel consumption and improve safety; Bridging waterways, in this context, is preferred over widening road~ to -I or 6 lanes /0 reduce miles traveled 1 fPlanninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom Auzust 25, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20Il) and should be removed,trom the! as a proposed revision.} Policy 6.1.2: Collier County shall coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to initiate a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of 1-75 and Everglades Boulevard. Coordination between the County and FDOT are ongoing for these purposes. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, but re-written to reflect the ongoing nature of these coordinated planning efforts, such as, The County shall to continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of 1-75 and Everglades Boulevard. 18 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN [Public Comment from February 23, 2010 EAR Public Meetinf! - Suggesting the 1-75 interchange should not route traffic through the Estates.] OBJECTIVE 6.2: For the purpose of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity, the County will actively work to increase linkages within the local road system. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective provides for increasing the linkages, or route alternatives, for traffic throughout the Golden Gate area, Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697. fflanninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be d~ferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.] This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from December 7, 2010 EAR Adovtion Hearinf! - Recommending this Objective and its subsequent Policies be modified to recognize and develop linlmges through an enhanced grid street pattern and an improved street network with new bridge connections.] Policv Relevance: There are three (3) policies within this Objective. Policy 6.2.2: Planning and right-of-way acquisition for bridges within the Estates Area local road system shall make adequate provision for sidewalks and bike lanes. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance ofreducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!Ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshov - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the/ as a proposed revision.] Policy 6.2.3: Sidewalks and bike lanes shall provide access to government facilities, schools, commercial areas and the planned County greenway network. 19 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN This Policy remains relevant and should be retained, essentially as written. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697. Policy 6.2.4: Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system's capacity and integrity. In addition, this Policy may be modified to indicate whether the greater Golden Gate area needs an Access Management Overlay, giving special considerations to commercial intersections, [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25, 2010 EAR WorksholJ - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 2011) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision] [Planninf! Commission (CCPCi Comment from December 7, 2010 EAR AdolJtion Hearinf! _ Recognizing this PoliCY:5 connection with Tramportation Element Policy 7. 1, and emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between [and developing different) "rural" and "urban" standards for ingress and egress, andfor traffic circulation.] OBJECTIVE 6.3: In planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City, Collier County shall coordinate with local emergency services officials to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective provides for the coordination with emergency services agencies in planning for the improvements to the roadway network throughout the Golden Gate area. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Coordinate with local emergency services officials in planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. [Planninf! Commission (CCPCi Comment (rom December 7, 2010 EAR Adootion Hearinf! _ Recommending this Objective and its subsequent Policies (as with Objective 6.2 above) be modified to recognize and develop linkages through both an enhanced grid street pallern and an improved street network with new bridge connections.] Policv Relevance: There are two (2) policies within this Objective, 20 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Policy 6.3.1: Beginning in 2005, the Collier County Transportation Planning Department shall hold at least one annual public meeting - with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition ot right-ot-way tor design and construction ot road improvements. This Policy requires the County to meet with emergency service providers and local CIVIC association(s) at least once each year to address emergency services' needs. The County has not conducted such meetings unless they took place within the context of coordination efforts during the design of specific projects or when departmental resources allowed. The date stated in this Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, while the remainder of this Policy should be retained if re- written to reflect the limited departmental resources that would allow fewer such meetings, or delete this Policy entirely. [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUl!ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshop - Suggesting that consideration for any such change should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re- study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision.] Policy 6.3.2: Beginning in 2005, the Collier County Transportation Planning Department shall coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. This Policy requires the County to meet with emergency service providers to address emergency services' needs in prioritizing road improvements, The date stated in this Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted, while the remainder of this Policy should be retained if re-written to indicate this as a 'continuing' coordination effort, and to identify the County agencies that are involved with emergency services related to evacuation needs, GOAL 7: THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, WILL BE PROTECTED THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MAN MADE DISASTERS. This Goal should be rephrased to improve its formatting as a "goal" , such as, TO PROTECT THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. OBJECTIVE 7.1: The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate agencies, will continue to maintain and implement public information programs to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, disaster situations. 21 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Objective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective provides for the protection of residents and the environment by operating public information programs covering disaster situations. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate agencies, to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prcvent, prepare for, and cope with, disaster situations. Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective, Policy 7.1.3: By 2005, the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Division shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any requiremenls that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. This Policy requires the County to meet with emergency service providers to address fire prevention standards, The date and Department title stated in this Policy are no longer relevant and should be deleted or revised, while the remainder of this Policy should be retained, essentially as written, OBJECTIVE 7.2: Capital improvement projecls within the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with all applicable emergency services providers to ensure that the needs of these entities are included in the overall public project design. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective provides for the protection of residents and the environment by involving emergency service providers in capital improvement project planning, This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Ensure that the needs of all applicable emergency services providers are included and coordinated in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden Gate Area. Policv Relevance: There are two (2) policies within this Objective, Policy 7.2.1: Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvemenls for projecls within the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with the Fire Districls, public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. 22 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN This Policy remains relevant and should be retained if re-written to identifY the "planners" or "planning staff" within each of these entities, Policy 7.2.2: The Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department shall receive copies of pre- construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and shall be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. This Policy remains relevant and should be retained if re-written to indicate how the planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, ,from these entities are, as a matter of practice, "offered" or "shown" copies of pre-construction plans, instead of requiring that every agency listed must "receive" pre-construction plans. VerifYing their receipt and possession of these plans is not necessary because the same entities are also invited to review and comment on these plans as they do with Utility Coordination Meetings, OBJECTIVE 7.3: While the County Transportation Planning Department is in the process of developing strategies for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area, interim measures to assure interconnection shall be developed. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: The above Objective provides for the protection of residents and the environment by improving emergency services through the development of roadway interconnection enhancement strategies. This Objective should be rephrased to improve its formatting as an "objective", such as, Develop strategies through the County Transportation Planning Section of the Land Development Services Department for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area and assure roadway interconnection in these areas through interim measures. Consideration should be given to revisions that recognize the importance of reducing VMT and GHG emissions in furtherance ofHB 697, Policies 7.3.2, 7,3.3 and 7.3,4 below do not clearly follow from Objective 7,3 above, These Policies should be consideredfor reformatting under a new, more specific Objective, or Objective 7.3 should be expanded to include statements that would logically lead to said Policies, [Planninf! Commission (CCPC) Comment from AUf!ust 25, 2010 EAR WorkshoTJ - Suggesting that consideration for changes related to HB 697 should be deferred until taken up again under a comprehensive re-study of the Master Plan (tentatively scheduled to get underway in 20ll) and should be removed from the! as a proposed revision} Policv Relevance: There are four (4) policies within this Objective. Policy 7.3.1: By 2006, the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, the Collier County Transportation Division, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate Federal, State or 23 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN PClc;rS ex L{ lV'--. d d ~ WQJr:C ()~ffl0 ~,- ---~-- C. Future Land Use Designation Description - Assessment of Select Provisions In addition to the above Assessment of GGAMP Goals, Objectives and Policies, staff provides below an Assessment of select portions of the Land Use Designation Description Section, 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION A Estates - Mixed Use District 3, Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01,03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are defined as: . electric or gas generating plants, . effluent tanks, . major re-pump stations, . sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, . hospitals and hospices, . water aeration or treatment plants, . governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2,01.03 of the Land Development Code), . public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and . public safety service facilities and other similar facilities. Provision Assessment: This provision, in varying iterations, has existed in the GGAMP since its adoption in 199] and remains appropriate, However, the LDC reference and/or list of uses may not encompass all essential services, e,g, communication towers which are listed in LDC See, 2,01,03 G" See, 5,05,09, and in various zoning districts. Additionally, the reference to the Estates zoning district fails to capture all zoning districts found in the Golden Gate Estates area, e.g, P, Public Use zoning at Max Hasse Park, The County recommends revising the LDC reference and/or list of essential services uses to encompass all essential services uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area, and expanding the referenced zoning district listed to encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates and/or adding reference to the Estates Designation, 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION B. Estates - Commercial District 3, Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Recognizing the unique development pattern and characteristics of surrounding land uses, the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map, The Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tract 71, Golden Gate 26 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Estates, Unit 23; and the East 165 feet of Tract 54, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, See Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map, a) The Criteria for the Subdistrict are as follows: . All commercial development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, . Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required, . Shared parking shall be required with adjoining developments whenever possible, b) Limitation of Uses - Uses shall be limited to the following: . Automobile Service Station; . Barber & Beauty Shops; . Convenience Stores; . Drug Stores; . Food Markets; . Hardware Stores; . Laundries - Self Service Only; . Post Offices and Professional Offices; . Repair Shops - Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; . Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive-in restaurants . Shopping Center; . Veterinary Clinics with no outside kenneling, Provision Assessment: The specific list of uses in this subdistrict has existed in the GGAMP since its adoption in 1991 and was taken from a PUD approved prior to 1991. On April 14, 2009, the BCC approved an Appeal of a Zoning Verification Letter (Resolution 2009-99) having the effect of allowing all uses of the C-2 zoning district in the LDC at that time, under the ternl "shopping center." The County recommends replacing the term "shopping center" with reference to C-2 uses (perhaps, "All Permitted Uses of the C-2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended, as of April 14, 2009"), 27 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Immokalee Area Master Plan Element STATEMENT OF ISSUE The lmmokalee Area Master Plan (lAMP) is an "optional element," under Section 163.3 I 77(7), Florida Statutes. As such, there are no specific criteria to guide the format and purposes of this Element. The Immokalee Area Master Plan was originally developed, as mandated by (1988) Policy 6.4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. ISSUE BACKGROUND Work on the original Master Plan began with the appointment of a Technical Advisory Committee in November 1988, An initial public workshop was held in February 1989, and subsequent informational workshops were held periodically, thereafter. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Immokalee Area Master Plan, as an element of the County's Growth Management Plan, on February 5, 1991. The first set of amendments to the plan, involving changes to both the text and the lmmokalee Future Land Use Map, were adopted in 1993. In 1996, based upon recommendations contained in Collier County's adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), staff initiated amendments to the lmmokalee Area Master Plan. Unlike the 1988 - 1991 process, the process initiated in 1996 did not involve an advisory committee specific to the lmmokalee Area, Instead, the proposed lAMP amendments were formulated and reviewed by staff, aided by an Evaluation & Appraisal Report Advisory Committee, which also helped stair formulate and review amendments to other Elements of the Growth Management Plan, The EAR-based amendments affected virtually the entire Immokalee Area Master Plan, including the lmmokalee Area Future Land Use Map. Various subdistrict boundaries were revised and two new subdistricts were created, Based upon the EAR recommendations, in October of 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an Ordinance enacting the revised Master Plan. The BCC adopted the Second EAR for the GMP on July 27, 2004, Such EAR called for revisions to the Immokalee Area Master Plan to be prepared as part of the subsequent County's EAR-based amendments, During 2003, as part of the preparation of the EAR, the BCC authorized Comprehensive Planning stair to prepare recommendations for revising the 1997 lAMP. Subsequently, the Board authorized creation of an advisory committee, the Immokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Committee (Restudy Committee), to work with staff in making proposed revisions to the lAMP, The Restudy Committee, assisted by Comprehensive Planning staff, submitted recommendations to the EAR (for recommended amendments to the lAMP), in November 2003. However, during the performance of its tasks, the Committee determined that a longer, more intense restudy of the lAMP was necessary. Therefore, the lAMP Restudy Committee expressed a desire to extend the life of the Committee so that it could continue to assist the Board with the implementation the lAMP. The re-established Committee was renamed as the Immokalee Area Master Plan and Visioning Committee (IMPVC). The BCC adopted Ordinance 04-62, sunsetting the lmrnokalee Area Master Plan Restudy Committee and creating the IMPVC, on September 28, 2004. 1 1mmokalee Area Master Plan Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption One of the Committee's first official acts was to direct staff to prepare Request For Proposals and Scope of Services to hire a consulting firm that would assist the IMPVC in revising the lAMP. The CRA hired the consulting firm RMPK Group and worked for a period of over four years conducting public meetings, collecting and analyzing data, and drafting revisions to the lAMP, This finn prepared a study entitled "Immokalee Inventory and Analysis Report" in May of 2006, but relinquished their services to the Immokalee CRA in 2008, R W A, Inc. was then hired and is presently the agent in charge of the proposed amendments to lAMP and subsequent Lind Development Code (LDC) regulations, The IMPVC sunsetted on December 31, 2009 by Resolution 2009-306. A series of public meetings and workshops were held in relation to the preparation of the current amendment to the lAMP. Agencies involved included the IAMPVC, and Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board (CRAAB), The Immokalee Area Master Plan Element of the GMP is currently in the process of revising and replacing each existing Goal, Objective and Policy of thc lAMP, as well as revising and replacing all future land use designations on the lAMP and lAMP FLUM, The lAMP is expected to be adopted during the first quarter 01'2011. In general, the amendment to the lAMP element of the GMP proposes eight new goals, each with respective objectives and policics; followed by the revised Land Use Designation Description Section which includes and describes the proposed land use designations that will guide patterns of development within thc Immokalec urban area and further the proposed goals through standards set forth within such land used designations, and the types of allowed land uses that could be requested, The first goal establishes thc prioritization of capital projects and other lAMP actIVItIes to accomplish the proposcd goals, subject to funding as approved by the BCC on an annual basis. The second goal prioritizes economic development in regard to opportunities for business and redevelopment initiatives and incentives that promote social benefits to the Immokalee community; encourages development away from environmentally sensitive lands; and allows for agriculture related business within certain areas of the Immokalee urban area. The third goal deals with housing, as it relates to fann worker and migrant housing needs; conservation and rehabilitation of housing; and the promotion of aft()fdable workforce and gap housing, Provisions for public infrastructure and public facilities are dcalt with in goal four. The fifth goal outlines standards and policies related to natural resources, Goal six describes the revised land use designations in Immokalee, Goal seven relates to development design standards that are specific to the lmmokalee Urban area, Goal eight provides for coordination with certain agencies. The last portion of the revised lAMP specifics the changes among each new land use designation and the density rating system, including density bonuses and the density and intensity blending provision, and the applicable correlating revisions to the FLUM, The proposed lAMP intends to implement the lmmokalee community's vision, as approved by the IMPVC, by promoting economic development and efficient delivery of services through greater density and intensity that encourage dense, clustered development; incorporating smart growth principles; and by providing greater development flexibility through mixed-use Subdistricts, 2 Immokalee Area Master Plan Updatedfor January 2011 Bee Adoption The proposed Plan intends to increase density and intensity as the main mechanism to promote economic development within the lmmokalee Urban Area. Staff acknowledges and supports the desires of the eRA and IMPVC to promote and diversify economic development in Immokalee. Specifically: . Changes in the FLUM proposes the majority of dense, mixed use of commercial and residential development along the main thoroughfares of Immokalee, surrounded by land uses that have the highest allowance for density. These higher density areas transition to lands that are allowed lower density and which are located mainly towards the edge of the urban area. Industrial development remains in the current general location of the lmmokalee airport. . Increase in density bonuses for mixed use development are meant to incentivize higher density along the main thoroughfares, and promote the changes in the land use designations ofthese areas that would further the proposed GOPs. . The proposed FLUM reduces the amount of residentially designated lands by 636 acres. This change allows for the re-designation of current Low Residential Designated lands located around the main thoroughfares of Immokalee. Such existing Low Residential areas are proposed to be re-designated to allow higher density and non-residential uses in order to further the proposed OOPs and create transition towards the low density areas, . In addition, some of the changes, such as the location of the Industrial - Mixed Use Subdistrict (IMU) do not seem to be compatible with the proposed adjacent designations. However, added development standards, such as specific landscaping buffers between the industrially designated lands and the residential areas, are meant to ameliorate compatibility issues between them. The following are some ofthe major changes proposed in the lAMP amendment: . Re-configuration of the wetland boundary that connects to Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay (see attached Map I), This revision was requested by staff. . The re-designation of the lands within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO), . The addition of ,t 103 acres of land that are proposed to be removed from the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA) and be included within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO). (Correlating changes to the countywide Future Land Use Map Series are not proposed at this time, but will be considered during adoption hearings.) . The addition of the "Loop Road," which is proposed to allow access from the lmmokalee Regional Airport and Florida Tradeport areas, to SR82 and SR29. . Revisions to the land use designations in the lAMP FLUM include: 3 1mmokalee Area Master Plan Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption o An increase in the base density allowed within the mixed use designated areas, However, no change in base density (DU/A - dwelling units per acre) is proposed within the Low, Medium, High and RT designated areas: . Low Residential: no change (4 DWA), . Medium Residential: no change (6 DU/A) . High Residential: no change (8 DU/A) . Mixed use: from 12 DlJ/A allowed within the existing Commerce Center: Mixed Use (CC-MU) and Neighborhood Center (NC) to 16 DWA allowed in the proposed Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) desif,'11ated areas. . Recreational Tourist (RT): no change (4 DU/A), o An increase of about 10 percent in the number of potential dwelling units that could be developed through base density: . A reduction in the base number of potential dwelling units within the Low, Medium and High Residential designated areas, from 57,230 dwelling units to 55,829 dwelling units, This change would allow 1,401 less dwelling units, . An increase in the base number of potential dwelling units within the Mixed-Use designation, from 10,341 dwelling units to 17,670 dwelling units, This change would allow 7,299 additional dwelling units. . An increase in the base number of potential dwelling units within the Recreational Tourist designation, /Tom 1,005 dwelling units to 1,805 dwelling units, The 800 additional dwelling units is due to the increase in the amount of acreage proposed to be designated as R T in the revised FLUM. The above noted reductions and additions in the base number of potential dwelling units in the lAMP FLUM, in conjunction with the changes in the amount of acreage of each land use designation, including the increase in acreage of RT designated. lands, yields an increase in the total base number of potential dwelling units, from 68,576 dwelling units to 75,307 dwelling units, This change represents an additional 6,730 dwelling units that would be allowed in the lAMP, o Changes in the maximum density (DlJ/A - dwelling units per acre) allowed within the low residential (reduction) and mixed use designated areas (increase): . Low Residential: from 12 DU/A to 8 DlJ/A . Medium Residential: no change (14 DWA) . High Residential: no change (16 DlJ/A) . Mixed use: from 12 DlJ/A allowed within the Commerce Center Mixed Use (CC-MU) and Neighborhood Center (NC) to 20 DU/A allowed in the proposed Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) designated areas, . Recreational Tourist (RT): no change (4 DU/A) 4 1mmokalee Area Master Plan Updated jar Janumy 20 II BCC Adoption o An 18 percent reduction in the maximum number of potential dwelling units that would be allowed in the lAMP: . A reduction in the maximum number of potential dwelling units within the Low, Medium and High Residential designated areas, from 157,011.4 dwelling units to 113,879.2 dwelling units. This change would allow 43,132,2 less dwelling units, . An increase in the maximum number of potential dwelling units within the Mixed-Use designation, from 10,341.6 dwelling units to 22,088 dwelling units. This change would allow 11,746.4 additional dwelling units, . An increase in the maximum number of potential dwelling units within the Recreational Tourist designation, from 1,005 dwelling units to 1,805 dwelling units. This change would allow 800 additional dwelling units due to the increase in the amount of acreage proposed to be designated as RT in the FLUM. The above reductions and additions in the maximum allowed number of potential dwelling units, in conjunction with the increase in acreage of R T designated lands, yields a reduction in the total maximum number of potential dwelling units in the lAMP FLUM, from 168,357,8 dwelling units to 137,774.4 dwelling units, This change represents a reduction of 30,583.4 dwelling units from what is currently allowed to be developed in the lAMP, o An increase in the amount of Recreational Tourist (RT) designated lands: from ole251.2 acres to ole451.8 acres, an increase of ole201 acres. This change would allow an increase in the potential number of dwelling units, from 1,005 dwelling units to 1,805 dwelling units (see Table 3); as well as an increase in the maximum amount of potential dwelling units that could be developed, o An increase on the cap of allowed density that can be requested within the Immokalee Urban Area, via density bonus, from a maximum of 16 DU/ A to a cap of20 DU/A. o A five percent reduction of residential designated lands. This change of over ole636 acres of residential designated lands are proposed to be re-designated to allow commercial and industrial development, as well as uses that are allowed under the RT designation. o An increase in the amount of commercial designated lands: from ole I 024.4 acres to ole I, 104.4 acres, an increase of ole80 acres of commercial designated lands. An increase in the amount of industrial designated lands: from 2,643.5 acres to 3,105.4 acres, an increase of ole462 acres of industrial designated lands. This increase includes the re-designation from Industrial (ID) to Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict (APO) of 1484,3 acres of land that are part ofthe Immokalee Regional Airport boundary, The proposed Plan includes Objectives and Policies that address HB 697. The Immokalee Area Master Plan has incorporated language within these Immokalee-specific amendments to address the energy efficiency issues. Specifically, the following proposed Goals, Objectives and Policies are designed to comply with HB 697 in the following manner: 5 1mmokalee Area Master Plan Updated/or January 2011 BCC Adoption Reducing the number and length of automobile trips (VMT): Objective 2.2, and its related policies, seeks to diversify the local economy and increase employment opportunities within the Immokalee Urban Area, thereby lowering the need to travel greater distances for work or services, Objective 4.2 addresses vehicular and non- vehicular transportation options and specifically references the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize energy consumption, Policies 4.2.6 and 4.2.7 discuss the need to improve and expand public transit options in Immokalee, Policy 4.2.8 seeks to evaluate whether a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area is appropriate for lmmokalee, Policy 6.1.5 specifically states that compact mixed-use development patterns are encouraged to create walkable communities, reduce vehicle miles traveled and increase energy efficiency. Promoting alternative modes of transportation: Objective 4.2 addresses non-vehicular transportation options and specifically references the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize energy consumption, Policy 4.2.2 references the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and Policy 4.2.5 recognizes the need to improve safety for pedestrians and bicycles, Policies 4.2.6 and 4.2.7 discuss the need to improve and expand public transit options in lmmokalee, Objective 7.1 recognizes the need for Immokalee-specific land development regulations that will encourage pedestrian friendly urban form and promote energy efficiency, Policy 7.1.2 cncourages new community facilities to be within a half-mile of residential and mixed use centers to encourage walking, bicycling and non-vehicular travel. Allowing for compact mixed-use development patterns: Goal 6, and its related Objectives and Policies. pertain to land use and specifically reference allowing and encouraging a mixture of uses. Objective 6.1 references the need to coordinate the Future Land Use Map that encourages desirable growth and energy efficient development patterns, Policy 6.1.5 specifically states that the Immokalee area encourages compact mixed- use development patterns to create walkable communities, reduce vehicle miles traveled and increase energy efficiency. Policy 4.1.2 encourages future parks to be located in the most densely populatcd areas, and recognizes the need for public plazas, greens and urban parks to make Immokalee more pedestrian friendly, Objective 7.1, and its related policies, recognizes the need for lmmokalee-specific land development regulations that will encourage pedestrian friendly urban form and promote energy efficiency, Policy 7.1.2 recognizes that new community facilities should be within walking distance to mixed use and residential centers. Policies 7.1.2, 7.1.3 and 7.1.4 all relate to compact, mixed-use, urban design criteria. The Urban-Mixed Use district allows for commercial development within the Residential Subdistricts, as described in the Land Use Designation Description section. Density bonuses are also allowed for projects that are proximate to Commercial Uses, Allowing for higher densities in appropriate places, which reduces the per capita carbon footprint, supports transit and reduces sprawl. Poliey 7.1.5 also encourages high intensity development in Immokalee through the development of a Central Business District overlay subdistrict in the Land Development Code, The Urban-Mixed Use district and subdistricts, as referenced in the Land Use Designation Description section, allow for higher residential densities, The base residential densities range from four (4) units per acre for Low Residential (LR) subdistrict to ten (10) 6 1mmokalee Area A/aster Plan Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption dwelling units per acre in High Residential (HR) and sixteen (16) in the Commercial-Mixed Use subdistricts. Density bonuses are also allowed for projects that are proximate to Commercial Uses or in infill areas, as well as for providing affordable-workforce housing, The revisions to the lAMP are intended to implement the Immokalee community's vision, as approved by promoting economic development and efficient delivery of services through greater density and intensity that encourage dense, clustered development; incorporating smart growth principles; and by providing greater development flexibility through mixed-use Subdistricts. (Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom Auzust 25, 2010 EAR Workshov - Would like to have the provisions contained in Policy 5.1.4, of the proposed lmmokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP)be resolved during the adoption hearings in regard to this plan. The CCPC also suggested that in the case that the work related to resolving the provisions of the proposed Policy 5.1,4, requires further analysis, then the provisions are to be resolved as part of the adoption hearing of the 2011 EAR.] (Recommendation trom October 14.2010 South Florida Water Manazement District (SFWMD) Comments to the DCA on Proposed EAR - That the County include a policy that provides a requirement for detailed design segments and development of funding mechanisms for the stormwater management improvements identified in the recommended alternatives of the 1mmokalee Stormwater Management Plan.] 7 1mmokalee Area Master Plan Updated for January 20 II BCC Adoption SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) ECONOMIC ELEMENT Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element will be revised to reflect tbe proper formatting for all Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below: Goal: General statement defining what the plan will ultimately achieve, typically beginning with 'TO" followed by a transitive verb, such as, TO PROTECT or TO ENSURE, Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describing actions that will help achieve the goal(s), typically beginning with the active verb providing the general direction, such as, "Implement", "Promote" or "Protect", Objectives use the term "will" and allow Policies to specifically require an activity with "shall". Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goals, typically beginning with phrases like, "The County shall promote,..", "The County shall continue to..," or "The District shall expand..," or similar phrases, Policies use the terms "may" or "shall" to provide specific direction, Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes. Objective 1 Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective. Policy 1.2 Revision to expand focus of policy, Objective 2 Revision to expand focus of objective Objective 3 Revision to objective by making this objective number I, with all policies under this objective reflecting the change. Policy 3,1 Modification based upon expansion of the policy. Policy 3.3 Modification based adding specificity to annual report and eliminating EDC reference. Policy 3,8 Revision based upon need to explain what IS the County's traditional economic base, Policy 3.9 Deletion based upon redundancy with policy 3.3 Policy 3.14 Relocation of text. 1 Economic Element - Summary Objective 4 Policy 4,] Policy 4,2 Policy 4,3 Revision to clarify the purpose of the objective. Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4,1, 4.2 and 4.3 into single policy, Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.1, 4,2 and 4,3 into single policy, Modification based upon proposed combination of policy, 4.], 4.2 and 4,3 into single policy, 2 Economic Element - Summary ECONOMIC ELEMENT Introduction and Backgronnd The purpose of this Element is to serve as a set of guidelines to assess the impacts of gro\'o1h management decisions on the County's economic vitality. The Element also addresses certain requirements of the Southwest Florida Strategic Regional Plan regar.ding economic issues. It must be noted that the Economic Element only encourages, and does not mandate, that the County consider economic matters in relation to its overall planning and growth management strategy, as reflected in the other Elements of this Growth Management Plan (GMP). In considering whether to adopt changes or modifications to the GMP or the Land Development Code, the Board of County Commissioners must weigh the relative importance of many factors, of which economic impacts are not always the most significant. The Economic Element contains a single Goal and six (6) Objective Areas. These Objective Areas are: I. The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural & Social Resources. 2. Expanding and Enhancing the Tourism Industry, 3, New and Existing Industries. 4. Nonprofit and Civic Organizations & Local Groups/Programs. 5. Expansion and Development of Educational Facilities and Programs, 6. Development Regulations, The below evaluation of the Goal, Objectives and Policies of the Economic Element has been a collaborative effort between the Collier County Economic Development Council (EDC) and Comprehensive Planning, GOAL: COLLIER COUNTY WILL ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A DIVERSIFIED AND STABLE ECONOMY BY PROVIDING A POSITIVE BUSINESS CLIMATE THAT ASSURES MAXIMUM EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WHILE MAINTAINING A HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE. OBJECTIVE 1 (The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural and Social Resources): Collier County will encourage the conservation and enhancement of those natural, cultural, and social resources that represent the foundation of the County's existing retirement, recreation, and tourist-oriented economy, in order to place the County in a competitive position to enable the retention and expansion of these and other business opportunities. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be remain. The County still maintains a position of strengthening the attributes which contributes to its competitive advantage regarding a sense of place which attracts new working and retired residents, as well as seasonal residents and short term visitors. The proposed revisions will be to clarify the purpose of the objective, as proposed below. OBJECTIVE 1 (The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural and Social Resources): Collier County will encourage the conservation and enhancement of those natural, cultural, and social resources that are 1 ECONOMIC ELEMENT integral represent tile feHnElatien of to maintaining and expanding that portion of the County's economv the CeHnty's e)listing which largelv relies on seasonal residents and short term visitors and retired residents. retirement, particularlv the recreation, hospitality and tourism industries t orienteEl eeonom)', in order to place the County in a the most advantageous cempetitive position to enallle tile retain effiien and expand 5ie!H;fthese and other similar or related businesses oppo/tunities. Plannini! Commission (CCPC! Comment trom Auzust 25, 2010 EAR Worhhoo - The CCPCfelt the renumbering of the Objectives as suggested by staff was unnecessary, Policy 1.2: Collier County will support the opportunity for development and establishment of hospitals, nursing homes and additional medical related facilities in order to promote a continuum of care to enhance the quality of life throughout the County. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised. As part of the means to make the County more attractive to a growing aging population, the attention and support of medical related facilities is essential. To further provide clarification the inclusion of medical related research and manufacturing facilities, is being proposed to be included within the facilities promoted, OBJECTIVE 2 (Expanding and Enhancing the Tourism Industry): Collier County will support programs that are designed to expand and enhance the tourism industry. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised, A central tenant of the composition of the Collier County economy lies within Tourism, not only for short term economic opportunities that tourist bring to the County, but the continual exposure of the County to potential new full time and seasonal residents who first experience the County through tourist opportunities have long term economic ramifications. The objective is being proposed to be modified by adding the words- "hospitalitv and the tourism industry" OBJECTIVE 3 (New and Existing Industries): Collier County will support programs which are designed to promote and encourage the recruitment of new industry as well as the expansion and retention of existing industries in order to diversify the County's economic base. Objective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains, The economic strategy employed by the County is a two prong approach; job creation through strengthening existing industries as well as active marketing to firms outside of the local market through recruitment eirorts. Policy 3.1: Collier County will support efforts to formulate an economic development plan to assist local organizations in fostering the expansion and diversification of the County's economic base. 2 ECONOMIC ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised, Collier County's financial commitment to the Collier County Economic Development Council is a direct effort to support and enrich the business environment. Additionally, the BCC recently approved the position of Economic Development Director to provide additional attention and resources to this critical effort, Based upon these two factors the policy is being proposed to be expanded as provided below, Policy 3.1: Collier County will support efforts by the Economic Development Council of Collier County to formulate all five-year economic development plan to :Jssist local organiz:Jtions in fostering the to specifically identify the steps to be taken to achieve expansion and diversification of the County's economy ic base. Policy 3.3: Collier County will support the preparation of an annual report on the progress of economic development in the County. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised. The preparation of an annual report detailing the economic progress and specifics of existing programs is an effort which helps provided the business community a wider breadth of understanding of the business envirorunent fostered by the County and potential opportunities within the County, The policy is being proposed as modified below, Policy 3,3: Collier County will support tho :Jtion of prepare an annual report on the progress of economic development and diversification, in tho County. specifically as it relates to achievinq the obiectives set forth in the five-year economic development plan referenced in Policy 3,1 Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUl!usl 25. 2010 EAR Workshov - Remove the reference to the EDC in the proposed policy. Policy 3.8: Collier County, in coordination with appropriate entities, will continue programs. that encourage and assist in the location of new companies that build on the traditional economic base. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised. Attention to the core components of the Collier Economy is a central tenant of the economic platform endorsed by the County and will continue to be as the County moves forward with its economic diversification eirorts, Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment trom AUl!ust 25, 2010 EAR Workshov - Would like to see traditional economic base articulated in policy, Policy 3.9: Collier County will support the preparation of an annual report on the progress of existing industry expansions and traditional industry starts. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be deleted. The policy is redundant, with the annual report provided for in policy 3.3. 3 ECONOMIC ELEMENT Policy 3.14: Collier County has adopted a comprehensive program of economic incentives that are designed to attract new businesses and develop the local workforce for such businesses. These incentives include: a. An impact fee payment assistance program for either new or expanding targeted industries; b. A job creation investment program for the relocation or expansion of targeted industries; c. A property tax stimulus program providing payments to offset the costs associated with the relocation and/or expansion of targeted industries; and, d. An advanced broadband infrastructure investment program, which provides payments to businesses that are either installing or expanding broadband communications systems. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text relocated. The County has identified the above means to reduce locational barriers faced by firms entering into the Collier market and will continue to do so in the future and the development of the Project Innovation initiative is direct evidence of this commitment. Planninz Commission (CCPC) Comment fi'om Auzust 25, 2010 EAR Workshoo - remove this policy and relocate to either the Housing Element or the 1mmokalee Area Master Plan. OBJECTIVE 4 (Nonprofit and Civic Organizations and Local Groups/Programs): Collier County will support the economic development goals, efforts and community involvement of nonprofit organizations, civic associations and local groups and programs. Objective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends be revised. Support to these groups or organizations are part of the overall support for attempts to bring diversity and sustainability to the Collier economic mix, The Objective is proposed to be revised to provide further clarification to it purpose as detailed below, OBJECTIVE 4 (Nonprofit and Civic Organizations and Local Groups/Programs): Recoqnizinq the sionificant economic and social benefits and the overall quality of place attributable in larqe part to the vast array of nonprofit orqanizations, civic and community associations, and other local oroups and proqrams in Collier County and in the southwest Florida region, the County will support the community involvement efforts and economic development goals of such organizations, associations, groups and programs. economic de'/olopment goals, efferts and community 'n'/o/'/emont of nonprofit organizations, ci'/ic ,n:sociations and local groups and programs, Policy 4.1: Collier County will support the economic development initiatives of regional nonprofit organizations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised, as suggested at the conclusion of policy 4.3, Successful economic development strategies must understand the economic landscape on a regional basis to identify and leverage opportunities contained within the region and with that understanding the county will support such regional efforts, 4 ECONOMIC ELEMENT Policy 4.2: Collier County will support the economic development goals and efforts of countywide organizations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text be revised, as suggested at the conclusion of policy 4.3. As with policy 4,1 the County understands the importance of local efforts with economic diversification efforts and will continue to support such organizations, Policy 4.3: Collier County will support the economic development efforts of localized organizations. Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text to be revised. Policy 4,1, 4.2 and 4.3 could be combined within one policy as suggested below Policy 4.1: Collier County will support the economic development; initiatives of regional nonprofit organizations, goals and efforts of countywide organizations and efforts of localized organizations. OBJECTIVE 5 (Expansion and Development of Educational Facilities and Programs): Collier County will encourage the expansion and development of educational facilities and programs that complement economic development and diversification. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains, Successful economic development strategies understand the necessity of linking educational institutions to specific industries to assist within technology transfer and product and process innovation, Additionally, a strong educational linkage to industry ensures a yearly supply of fresh talent and ideas for existing business to draw upon and stands as a required infrastructure for a locality to provide similar to other locational infrastructure requirements. OBJECTIVE 6 (Development Regulations): Collier County will maintain a system of development regulations that will promote the accomplishment of the goals, objectives, and policies of this Element. Obiective Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remains. The level of complexity associated with the development regulations of the County must weigh the protections being sought against the barriers they create for new business starts and existing business expansion, Attention must be paid to both sides of the balance. Policy 6.1 Collier County will periodically review its land development regulations for consistency with the Collier County Growth Management Plan to promote the accomplishment of the goals, objectives and policies of this Element. 5 ECONOMIC ELEMENT Policv Achievement Analvsis: Collier County recommends text remain, Periodic review of development regulations arc required to ensure that unintended negative consequences, contrary to the GMP's Economic Element are not resulting from such development regulation. Planninf!. Commission (CCPC) Comment (i'om AUf..'Ust 25, 2010 EAR Worksho/J - Leave policy as written. 6 ECONOMIC ELEMENT SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) Public School Facilities Element Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect the proper formatting of Goals, Objectives and Policies, as defined below. Goal: General statement that defines what the Element will ultimately achieve, Objective: A more specific statement than the stated Goal; describes actions that will hclp achieve the goal(s). Policies: Specific statements that provide directives on how to achieve the objectives and ultimately the Element's goal(s). Goals, Objective and Policies: The entire Element should be revised to reflect Department name changes, designee changes, renumbering due to objective and/or policy additions and/or deletions, and grammatical changes, Policy 2.3~ Delete the last paragraph within the Policy, as the required school concurrency regulations were adopted within the Land Development Code in June 2010. Policy 2.5: Delete the Policy, as the required school concurrency regulations were adopted within the Land Development Code in June 201 O. Policy 3.6: Revise the Policy to reflect the establishment of the Citizen Advisory Group (CAG); and, add a reference to reflect that the planning and monitoring of school concurrency by the CAG is ongoing. 1 PSFE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES Updated for January 20] 1 Bee Adoption Assessment of the Successes and Shortcomings and Recommendations for the Public School Facilities Element A. Background and Introduction In 2005, the Florida Legislature enacted legislation (Senate Bill 360) amending Sections 163.3177 and 163,3180, F.S., requiring the establishment of concurrency for public school facilities not granted an exception, The implementation of school concurrency requires local governments to establish level of service standards for concurrency for public schools and adopt a Public School Facilities Element into their comprehensive plans. In 2008, in response to this legislative requirement, the Collier County School Board, Collier County and the municipalities within the County, coordinated the adoption of the Public Schools Facilities Element along with amendments to the Intergoverrunental Coordination and Capital Improvements Elements to ensure consistency among the local governments' comprehensive plan elements and the School Board's plans, The Public Schools Facilities Element implements a uniform, district-wide public school concurrency system requiring concurrency for public schools be met before development orders are issued, The Collier County School District has a current enrollment of 42,849 students in grades pre- kindergarten through twelfth grade based on the school enrollment census taken in October 2009, The Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for existing core facilities can serve 48,257 students, The District reports that by year 2019, the projected student enrollment numbers are expected to grow to over 49,800 students, In order to meet the district-wide level of service standard of 100 percent for high schools, and 95 percent for both elementary and middle schools, within the five year planning horizon, an clementary school expansion to add 162 seats is planned and programmed within the District's Five-Year Work Plan, The Collier County School District currently meets the adopted level of service standards for public school facilities, School concurrency capacity projects identified in the School District's Five-Year Work Plan do not require Collier County to provide capital improvements for those projects within the five- year planning period. Based on student enrollment projections and the elementary school expansion plamled and programmed in year 2014/2015, Collier County will continue to meet the adopted level of service standards for public school facilities for the five-year planning period. B. Element Review Less than two years have passed since the Public School Facilities Element was adopted, During that time period the County experienced a decline in residential development and an 1 PUBLIC SCHOOL F AC1LITlES ELEMENT Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption outmigration of its population. As a result, school facility construction lessened and projects planned within the School District's 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan were moved into later planning years. Since the school concurrency program generally remains unchanged since its adoption, the County is proposing minimal changes to PSFE at this time. Proposed changes to the Element include: deleting a paragraph within Policy 2.3 and deleting Policy 2.5 to reflect the adoption of implementing school concurrency provisions within the Land Development Code in June 2010; and, revising Policy 3.6 to reflect the establishment of a Citizen Advisory Group and provide that the planning and monitoring of school concurrency by the CAG is ongoing. C. Objective Analysis OBJECTIVE 2: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The County, in cooperation with the School District, shall ensure a school concurrency evaluation is performed on all non-exempt residential development to verify that new students can be accommodated within the adopted level of service standard established for each school type as measured within a CSA. [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only; no change is proposed] Policy 2.3: The County, through its land development regulations, and in conjunction with the School District, shall establish a school concurrency review process for all residential development projects that are not exempt under Policy 2.2 of this Element. The following are the minimum review process requirements for all non-exempt residential development: A. Submittal of a residential development application including a School Impact Analysis (SIA) to the County for sufficiency review. B. Determination of completeness by the County. If deemed complete, the County shall transmit the application, including the SIA, to the School District for review. C. Review of the application, by the School District, for available capacity, and issuance of a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) within 20 days after receipt of a complete application from the County. The School District shall identify the following in the SCADL: 1. Available capacity within the affected CSA. 2. If capacity is not available within the affected CSA, the available capacity within one or more of the adjacent CSAs. (If the affected CSA does not contain a particular school type (elementary, middle, high), the adjacent CSAs shall be evaluated for available capacity.) 2 PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption 3. If capacity is not available in the adjacent CSAs, the School District shall indicate that the development is not in compliance with the adopted LOSS and offer the applicant the opportunity to negotiate a mitigation plan within a 90 day period. The Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency and this Public School Facilities Element shall provide the process necessary to determine available school capacity for all residential projects that are not exempt under Policy 2.2 of this Element, until such time as land development regulations (LDRs) are adopted. In the event that one of the documents listed above is not in effect prior to LOR adoption, the other document shall provide the process necessary to determine available school capacity for all non-exempt residential projects. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Policy remains relevant and should be retained, However, the last paragraph should be deleted, as this policy objective has been achieved with the adoption of Land Development Code regulations in 20]0, Policy 2.5: Within one (1) year from the effective date of the School Concurrency Growth Management Plan amendments, the County shall adopt school concurrency provisions into its Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to implement school concurrency. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The Policy objective has been achieved with the adoption of Land Development Code regulations in 2010, This Policy is no longer relevant and should be deleted. OBJECTIVE 3: The County and the School District will: coordinate the location of public schools with the Future Land Use Map and map series to ensure that existing and proposed school facilities are located consistent with existing and proposed residential areas they serve and are proximate to appropriate existing and future land uses, and serve as community focal points; coordinate the location of public school facilities relative to the location of other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible; coordinate existing and planned public school facilities with the plans for supporting infrastructure; establish a monitoring group; and address coordination on emergency preparedness issues. Public Comment (Communirv Meetin>! held on 3/15/10): Public stated that there is a need to courdinate school siting andfacility planning with County infrastructure, [This Objective is providedfor contextual purposes only, no change is proposed] 3 PUBLIC SCHOOL FAC1Ll71ES ELtMENT Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption Policy 3.6: The County, in conjunction with the School District, shall establish a Citizen Advisory Group (CAG) to monitor planning and school concurrency in Collier County. Policv Achievement Analvsis: The policy objective has been achieved with the establishment of the CAG in 2009, This Policy remains relevant and should be retained. However, the Policy should be revised to reflect the establishment of the Citizen Advisory Group and that the monitoring and planning of school concurrency, by the CAG, is an ongoing activity. 4 PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption Three . aJor Issues 12/83/2889 16:18 8584883389 COMM F'LAI-NING PAGE: 82/85 '/' . STAT! OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida" better place to cafl homs" CM.....LIE CRIST -- nlOOl.OS G. PELMA" -.... Detember 4, 2009 Mr. R.andal11. Cohen. AlCP Director ofCollqll'ebensive Planning Comprehensive PllMlng Department 2800 North HoneIhoc Driw: Naples. Florida 34\ 04 RE: Collier County Evaluation Appraisal Report Let1l::r of Unck:rstanclillll Dear Mr. Cohen; The Department has m:eived your letter dated November 24, 2009, whir;h outlines the lIU\ior issues tbat Collier County will focus on for the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the COIIIlty', Comprehensive Plan. This letter serves as !be Department's oontinnation that the issues ick:nti.tied in your Jettllr are the lIIlIior i_ on which Collier County will focus. 1 am confident that !be EAR will contain a comprehensive 8S8CSsmentw evaluation of tile ~ of the County', Comprehensive Plan in IIChieving the coals related 10 the major issues, as well as identiIYing the necessary EAR-based amendmentll for achieving those goals. We look forward to continUing to provide tecbnica1 assistance to the County during the EAR pI'OCleQ. If you have BU)' questions reprding this matter or if we may be of further asmtance as you proceed with the EAR. please: COlIl8ct Brenda Winningham, ltegional Planning Administnltor. at ('50) 4874545, or Scott Rogers, Senior Planner. at (850) 922-1758. SiDCa'l:Jy youn, ~~ Charles Gauthier, AIC? Director. Division of Community Planning COlA' Attac:hmelU: Collier letter of November 24. 2009 c:c: 1"he Honorable Ocnna Fiala. Chainnan. Collier County Board of County CommlssionCl'S Z55' IHUMARO OAIC aOULEVARD . TALLAMASIII. FL 222".1100 850..481..8'$8 rtaJ . '~O.'Zt.0781 (f) . Wllb.it.. 'lWwtN ojc-.. lIltf. ff u.. .~lT~ t!Cl~,:~:., ~......:r~l". . ~.MOCCII.uNrn" DlWL.OPMmO' '1150 o\Mo,.1M:lt 4!<:1.~ /IlO~ In , __.._m_.w"'__.____'.~,___,.___".__.~_..'.,.~>O". ,'- Collier County Evaluation and Appraisal Report List of Ma ior Issues 1. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT As part of its growth management program the County has adopted a variety of measures to ensure that infrastructure is available when needed to support new development/redevelopment and that such development pay its fair share. These measures include adopted Level of Service Standards, a concurrency management system, impact fees, perntit and services fees, proportionate-fair share ordinance, direct cost accounting and a Five- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to program the timely construction of needed public facilities, The EAR will include a series of interrelated evaluations of the actions taken by the County and recommendations regarding changes needed to better achieve community-planning objectives, The EAR will evaluate the effectiveness of the concurrency management measures in achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standards and ensuring that infrastructure is available when needed to support development and that development pays for growth related impacts, 2. CLIMATE CHANGE The EAR wi!! evaluate the policies and objectives within the GMP for their effectiveness towards promoting reductions in vehicle miles traveled and corresponding reduction in green house gas emissions. 3. URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERN The EAR will evaluate the objectives and policies of the GMP for their effect upon the pattem and timing of urban development throughout the County, The EAR will evaluate the effectiveness ofthe urban boundary line and policies related to urban areas in lmmokalee, 4. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION Evaluate the County's watershed management planning and floodplain management programs and existing criteria to deterntine the deb'Tce to which related planning objectives have been achieved, 5. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Assess the ongoing coordination between Collier County and surrounding local governments, other governmental agencies, and special districts, and assess the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the plan and determine ifany deficiencies exist or modifications are required, The EAR will evaluate the effectiveness ofthe intergovernmental coordination related to the planning and provision ofpotable water. 6. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The EAR will evaluate how successful the County has been in providing affordable housing during the previous implementation period, the status of available affordable housing in the County and determine if any modifications to the GMP are necessary, 7. RURAL LANDS STEWARDSHIP AREA OVERLAY The EAR will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan in achieving the plan objectives and policies associated with the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. 8. RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT The EAR will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan in achieving the plan objectives and policies associated with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Water Resource Protection STATEMENT OF ISSUE An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the GMP for their effect on managing water resource protection throughout the County by promoting mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems, ISSUE BACKGROUND Subsection 163.3177 (5)(d), Florida Statutes requires all local goverrunents within the State of Florida to have, as part of their respective Local Goverrunent Comprehensive Plans, an Element, dealing with "the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, water wells, estuarine marshes, soils, beaches, shores, flood plains, rivers, bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine habitat, minerals, and other natural and environmental resources." The statute further relates the functions of the Conservation and Coastal Elements so that, in effect, local governments in designated coastal areas, such as Collier County, are required to prepare a Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which fulJills the requirements for both Elements, Accordingly, Collier County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element is divided into thirteen (13) separate goal areas. These may be summarized as follows: I. Protection of natural resources; 2. Protection of surface and estuarine water resources; 3, Protection of groundwater resources; 4, Protection of freshwater resources; 5. Protection of mineral and soil resources; 6, Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat; 7. Protection of fisheries and wildlife; 8, Maintenance of existing air quality; 9. Management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes; 10. Protection of coastal resources: 11. Protection of historic resources: 12. Hurricane evacuation and sheltering; and 13, A voiding duplication of regulations, Collier County is a large land area of approximately 2000 square miles in southwest Florida, The topography is extremely flat ranging from a high elevation of approximately forty (40) feet above sea level in the unincorporated community oflmmokalee in the northeastern portion of the County to the back of a low coastal dune system at approximately four (4) feet at the coastline along the western and southern portions of the County, The typical ground slope is approximately one (I) foot per mile in the western half of the County and less than that in the eastern half of the County, Additionally the area receives an average rainfall of about 53 inches with 37 inches during the wet season (June through October), Due to the lack ofrelief, abundant rainfall, highly permeable soils, and proximity to sea level the ground water table is very close to 1 Water Resource Protection Updatedfor January 2011 BCC Adoption the ground surface, The flat topography results in large areas of sheetflow across natural ground, but canals, road construction. agricultural operations, and urban development have greatly altered this sheetflow in the western portion of the County. Collier County, due to the Immokalee Ridge in the northeast, is basically its own drainage watershed. The shallow topography, with the lmmokalce Ridge located in the northeastern portion of the County near the Lee County and Hcndry County boundaries, creates a series of drainage basins with very little exchange of stormwatcr crossing County lines, Additionally. in some locations agricultural and development activities have constructed earthen berms along their property lines that correspond to the County lines that further define the drainage basin boundaries, The eastern half of the County is predominantly federally owned wetlands that receives sheet flow as a part of the Everglades system, but this remains in the eastern half of the County and continues the flow in a southwesterly direction, Due to the low gradient terrain and wetland hydrologic features, construction of canals along section lines and roads, drainage is not unif(mn and implementation of a unifoml level of service for flood conveyance in all areas of Collier County is not feasible, The County generally considers a 25-year 3-day rainfall event as the design storm f()r area west of Collier Blvd, (CR- 95]) and a 10-year I-day rainfall event as the design stonn for the Golden Gate Estates areas east of Collier Boulevard (CR 95]), Because the soils are so porous the canals drain preserves and shallow aquifers as well as residential developments, The shallow aquifers are utilized by suburban and rural rcsidents Jor potable water. Additionally the largc fresh water discharges, contributed from the development of the county. during the wet season have been found dctrimcntal to the cstuarics, For these reasons there have been many adjustable water levcl controls installed in the canal systems to improve functionality, The development of Watershed Management Plans and interim regulations is specified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Objective 2.1 of the Collier County Gro\'.lh Management Plan, as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on 1-25-07 (Ordinance 2007-16). The Florida Department of Community Affairs reviewed all amendments to the CCME, including the addition of thcsc "intcrim standards" and on 5-2-07 issued their Notice of Intent to find the CCME amendments "in compliance" with Florida Statutes, After the 21-day challenge pcriod ended without a challcnge being liled, the amendments to the CCME became effective on 5-24-07. The interim standards require a new development and rc-devclopment projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 5,2.1 (a) of the Basis of Review Jor Environmental Resource Pemlit Applications (February 2(06) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable ofTsitc discharge ratcs required by Drainage Sub-clement Policy 6,2 and 6,3, respectively, The 150% water quality volumetric rcquircment also applies to the County's minimum rcquirement of one (I) inch under Ordinance 90-10, as amcnded; thus increasing the County's minimum requirement to one and one-half (1.5) inches, 2 Water Resource Protection UpdatedfiJr Januwy 20// Bee' Adoption WMP Watersheds - FDEP Everglades West Coast Watersheds Legend \ \ I \ , DacNP DcocnatclleeB"eCh CCoc(>nalcneeCOrkscrew DF'akaUnJ~n 1-', FDEP Ewe Watersheds 0 Marco Beactl I ' c:::J MartH I$Olml o Naplee _NilIlleSlJe.Ch _ Ok"loacochso-SR29 r---J Hendry County o Rooksl'fBav J r~ -'~'-!~_:J' __ ~_"O -_"iI'.,_ o Fakaha1thee DsoumNa~",sEle.ch ",,'cr ~__ _GOldenGateNaples8ay~TenThoUliandlslands DGUK --_..~_. 'i \ , \ " , ^I, \ '. .......__..~_.._-_.- 1:::' l"lile", 1 .,['. 1 Corher County ~_:""""_.....i.~ 1\),,-; ul stllrag.c or conveyance \o[umc rCSUJilIlg IrOIll Jlrcct nnpacts to wetlands shaH he .J Water Resuurce ProtectlO/J Updaledfiir .1a/Juan ]lIll ECI' ..ldujJrio/J compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland, Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated [or developments within the designated flood zones "A", "AE", and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of November 17, 2005, Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheetJlow conditions, Comprehensive Plan Implementation The Collier County Growth Management Plan addresses the need to complete the prioritization and begin the process of preparing Watershed Management Plans, which is to contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems, The process consist of (1) an evaluation of areas f<lr which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on current or past watershed management planning efforts, (2) an assessment of available data and information that can be used in the development of Watershed Management Plans, and (3) budget authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed Management Plan. A funding schedule is established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by 20 I O. In selecting the order of Plan completion, the County shall give priority to watersheds where the development growth potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of wetland and listed species habitats, The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the Federal and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, The County shall apply the interim standards for development. As described in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, Watershed Management Plans (WMPs) are to serve as a watershed management tool to guide future development - they arc to "protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems." They are to hel p identify areas where state standards arc not currently met and to develop stratcgies to help meet them in thc future, They are also to identify water management strategies appropriate to each drainage basin that can be used to guide development. land use changes, and mitigation within that basin, The County's Watershed Management Plan that is being developed will help protect estuaries and wetland systems to: . Restore historical water quantity and estuarine diseharges, · Improve water quality within watersheds and estuaries, . Address flood eontrol and water supply issues Below are the public comments rcceived related to Water Resource Protection: WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION . County should re-evaluate monitoring and maintenance procedures for nutrient loads/pollution/water quality Objective 1 of the Drainage Sub-Element. -I Water Resource Protection Updated(i,,' January 2011 Bee Adoption . Improve public participation outreach and involvement for watershed management planning ObservationaL The County needs better outreach and education with user-friendly terminology and use illustrations, ObservationaL The County Watershed Management Planning needs to be holistic - more than just water, Observational. With a future unpredictable climate we cannot depend on previous historical levels of water. Observational. Develop new tools to predict future water availability. Policy 1.3 of Potable Water Sub- Element. GMP elements need to consider the ~ffects they have on each other and: Available water supply: Waste Management (Landfills): and Drainage. Observational. If and when sea levels rise, what has the BCB done to keep water in the Eastern Collier area fresh and apartfrom encroaching seas? Observational-Major Issue - Climate Change. The County has let the residents down by acquiescing in the FIRM ObservationaL The County has failed to provide guidance to the people who will need a LOMA, Programmatic. The County has failed to limit growth based on available resources. Objective 2 (Financial Feasibility) Capital Improvement Element. The County has failed to consider the cumulative effect of deep aquifer withdrawal. Observational. The County has failed to develop a County-wide Storm Water Plan. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Canals not cleaned (algae and weeds cover canal along Frangipani Ave.) Algae sheet sunk (causingfuture problemsfhrfish and drainage). Programmatic. C Z connector has better flow due to culverts being installed. Obsen'ational. FEMA elevations too large a burden during severe recession. Observational. Need more efficient water management of rural areas east ofCR951 to prevent flooding and being rezoned to flood area, Observational. The new Flood Insurance is unacceptable. Observational. The County should protest FIRM Observational. [{flooding is a problem, don't allow additional buildings and a.lphalt (which can impact their neighbors). Observational. Ditches and swales are not being cleaned and cleared. and driveways do not have proper culverts, Programmatic. Standing water only 3 times ('95, '06 and '(8) the same time the county took readings. Observational. County Government has failed to implement the Watershed Management Plan into which all other Construction and Coastal Elements, Goals and Objectives were to be involved Observational- Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Water Resource Protection Updated for January 20]] BCC Adoption . Disappointed with County 'sfailure to put the '89 GMOP LDC into place in a timely manner. Observational. County has failed to address sustainability and quality of life Jor all resources, Observational. The '119 GMP required that all aspects will be eraluated. watershed hy watershed. where is that guidance? Observational - Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. A II development in the urban zones and outside should be considered and evaluated after each watershed and its characteristics were developed. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Failed to put into place a Watershed Management Plan. Objective 2.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Dropping water table in C;C; Estates. C;C; Estates water resources are being used by City and other areas without benefit to GC; Estates. Observational. Re-use water- can it be turned into a drinking water source' Potential waste of re-use water is a concern (If there is no demand. ]j'hypayfi)],trcatmene) Policy 1.1 Potable Water Sub-Element. County has no Flood Plain Managemem Plan. Policy 6.3 Drainage Sub-Element. No coordination with Big C)press Basin: SFWMD: FEMA and DEI' (ex: - Picayune Strand Restoration project was completed without consideration of the effect oj'the RLSA on the flood plain). Observational. Where are the Comprehensil'e Watershed Management l'lan and the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan" Policy 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element. When are the effims going to he: Funded: Delivered: and Scheduled. Observational. Where is monitoring and maintenance o(water resource" Potable Water and Drainage Sub- Elements, Watershed/IYater Resource Management needs to he holistic. Observational. Environme nt/ Del'elopme nt/( 'onsel'\'at ion. Recharge:Re<:vcle: ReuselA lternat il'e It'ater Resources Observational. 771C Coumy needs to establish a Storn1l1'Oter Utility fee to address needed improvements and to address EI'A 's implementation o('the NNC (Numeric Nutrient Criteria). Observational & Policy 1.5 Drainage Sub-Element, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The following pages documents is a summary of related GOPs that addresses watershed planning and which serve as the premise of the current County's effort in addressing water resource protection. 6 Water Resource Protection UpdatedJor January 20 11 BCC Adoption Water Resource Protection The following is a partial excerpt of Goals Objectives and Policies from the Collier County Growth Management Plan that address watershed planning issues. Introduction Subsection 163,3177 (5)(d), Florida Statutes requires all local goverrunents within the State of Florida to have, as part of their respective Local Government Comprehensive Plans, an Element, dealing with "the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, water wells, estuarine marshes, soils, beaches, shores, flood plains, rivers, bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine habitat, minerals, and other natural and environmental resources," The statute further relates the functions of the Conservation and Coastal Elements so that, in effect, local governments in designated coastal areas, such as Collier County, are required to prepare a Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which fulfills the requirements for both Elements, Accordingly, Collier County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element is divided into thirteen (13) separate goal areas, These may be summarized as follows: I, Protection of natural resources; 2, Protection of surface and estuarine water resources; 3, Protection of groundwater resources; 4, Protection of freshwater resources; 5, Protection of mineral and soil resources; 6. Protection of native vegetation and wildlife habitat; 7, Protection offishcrics and wildlife: 8, Maintenance of existing air quality; 9, Management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes; 10. Protection of coastal resources: 11. Protection of historic resources; 12, Hurricane evacuation and sheltering; and 13, Avoiding duplication ofregulations, CONSERV A nON AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT ,January 25, 2007 Policy 1.3.5: Where possible, the implementation of the NRPA program shall be coordinated with the preparation and implementation of watershed and sub-basin management plans, GOAL 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROTECT ITS SUR}'ACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. Objective 2.1: By January 2008, the County shall complete the prioritization and begin the process of preparing Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The process shall consist of (1) an evaluation of areas for which Watershed Management Plans are not necessary based on current or past watershed management 7 Water Resource Protection Updated far January 2011 Bee Adoption planning efforts. (2) an assessment of available data and information that can be used in the development of Watershed Management Plans, and (3) budget authorization to begin preparation of the first Watershed Management Plan by January 2008, A funding schedule shall be established to ensure that all Watershed Management Plans will be completed by 2010, In selecting the order of Plan completion. the County shall give priority to watersheds where the development gro'W1h potential is greatest and will impact the greatest amount of wetland and listed species habitats, The schedule and priorities shall also be coordinated with the Federal and State agency plans that address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the following as interim standards for development: a, All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 5.2,I(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District (February 2006) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable offsite discharge rates required by Drainage Sub-element Policy 6,2 and 6,3, respectively; b, Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland, c. Floodplain storage compensation shall be cvaluatcd !(l[ developments within the designated flood zones "A", "AE". and "VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of November] 7. 2005, Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or shectflow conditions, d, All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to determine impacts to natural wetlands. !lowways. or sloughs, For this particular evaluation. natural wetlands, jJowways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified as contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet facultative plant species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the natural wetland, flowway, or slough at least one ( I ) f()ot lower than the ground at the edge of the natural wetland, flO\vway, or slough, The edge of the natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be identified by tield determination and based upon vegetation and elevation differences from the adjacent uplands or transitional wetlands, The County shall require the applicant to avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or. when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact. The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 200]-27, adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and provided basin delineations where special peak discharge rates have been established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings of the Watershed Management Plans, e. All new development and re-dcvelopment projects shall ensure sUlTounding properties will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on stormwatcr sheet flow, f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all development projccts to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental permits,s 8 IValer Resource Prolcelio/1 Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future development or re-development projects, Best Management Practices means structural and nonstructural facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution either through source control or treatment of stormwater, Figure I, Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.I.d is Applicable [See Figure I following CCME text] --'--.-'-.L--.-.-'-'---'-;~~~J-t=-.~=~L.-j ! ! '" ri,J '-- ~~T''''''''\. i I ... / -. ~ r===-==-' j..-.-..,-- ,," ~ "'.".,e-"'~ I - I~. , ~' '. .M I "' . '",'_'_'_'_'_ TJL:L,':"_.~:-c-~-,-,-,-.:::-.-.-=~~~~ , -, 11. ,\,~~:.. ,'f' ,~~ ~ .r,t:f~"Lw-,,;o,t..:t':d ';:;" ~''';-''' 1~ ;, ';;~;^'j^ ;.<" '".tr".~1&~,,~;."~ ;& ~,~-','~._:.'.?,~ti,-,,]l~J ec.. .. ~;-,,~w. l'>~t ~>~ ~ '. .~ W;, ",_..~-"'-""'==== '1"\ '.,,, & \ .......'"" - I II ,,", -:;:.'~ '~'t,~, "';; ",,' )1 .w i - "".. ~ I>C"" i/ .1/ ~i;~,l~~' 1 i ~";"L:....'..f"- "';"2"',,:":5_ r- : ;":' J<' : i.-'~------",,;:-',,--:,-:-.=: u ,,'~' ...." "'J'i j.' ,... '" -: ,,':' ':1 .r""~ . .(<,' I.... ........ ;,-:;~, ccA' "'1/:~:'::", "":).1\"., '_'\.:_~..-:.,.-l "'I: t "<..',.~~~~~__~_~ '(~.~f" c. , r-=':!,~:; ~.' I t_~, ~ 1< -, ,7;. _ ~''''i'iiC''f I -~1 \ -~l.~ ,,:::':2=-.=-=J ",,,::et. ~:"'i ~( '\ ~;~:,:" I~~! "",,: . ~ , ~. ! : , t 1....;...-_._._-.-.-------- \ ..., ~ \ tl' ~ 1\ II t \\! 1\ , ' . ~ " ' \ "''''''''......, , , . , " , , ,. , , '. ~. """'''''''''''"~ ""..,...... """"""<<- " " labels shown are Project ID Numbers ~""'" Duplicate numbers are nol shown ""'... Polygons are shaded by group "\',,<~ Some old prolects could not yet be " assigned to grOllps. and are shaded "" m9~Y \ ::ll ,,\. , ~~'-~-, i ADG SAT Project Changes ! -----.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-----.---.-.- Coverage STEP4 as of 20 July 2006 Modified from the shapefile received from Usa Beever on 7/11106, after she had added back some old projects. Updated project and group names Added Sobczak's areas, resolved al! polygons and names/numbers according to meeting on 7/11106. " " " " " " " 9 Water Resource Protection Updated far January 2011 Bee Adoption Policy 2.1.1: These Plans will evaluate activities in the watersheds that drain into the estuaries in order to evaluate cumulative impacts on the estuarine system as well as impacts within the watersheds themselves, Policy 2.1.2: The Plans will provide for various tasks such as monitoring land-disturbing activities in the watersheds. collecting canal flow and water quality data. storm water quality data, and assessing habitat changes, Policy 2.1.3: The Plans will also evaluate structural and non-structural controls for restoring historical hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where possible and for reducing the impacts of canal and storm water discharges to estuaries, Policy 2.1.4: All Watershed Management Plans shall address the following concepts: a. Appropriate wetlands and uplands serving as a buffer to wetlands are conserved; b, Drainage systems do not degrade wetland and estuary ecosystems; c, Surface water that potentially could recharge ground water is not unduly drained away; d, When feasible the extent and effects of salt-water intrusion arc lessened; e, The timing and flow of fresh water into the estuaries tfom the watcrshed shall, as a minimum. not degrade cstuarine resource value: f. The needs of the watershed's natural resources and human populations are balanced; g. The effccts on natural flood plains, stream channels, native vegetative communities and natural protective barriers which arc involved in the accommodation of flood waters: h, Non-structural rather than structural methods of surface water managcment should be considered first in any proposed new works: i, Wctland and estuarine habitat functions arc conserved and/or enhanced: and j, Wetland and estuarine ecosystems will be conserved and/or enhanced using a variety of innovative tools. including landowner incentives. public acquisition. conservation easements, and/or transferable development rights, Policy 2.1.5: Upon establishmcnt of the various Watershed Management Plans t()r Collier County, all environmental data collection. environmental management and environmental planning a. activities conducted by Collier County shall be conducted using a basin-by-basin approach, Policy 2. 1.6: Until the completion and adoption of individual watershed management plans, promote water management permitting on a basin by basin approach. Policy 2.1. 7: Collier County shall take the lead and promote intergovernmental coordination between the County and other governmental agencies involved with watershed planning, including, but not 10 Water Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoptian necessarily limited to, the municipalities of Marco Island, Naples and Everglades City, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers and other governmental agencies, The County will take the lead and oversee the preparation of the necessary watershed management plans, and will rely upon the work performed or data collected by other agencies, to the extent that these agencies have data and/or experience, which may be useful within the watershed basin planning and management process, OBJECTIVE 2.2: All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable Federal, State, or local water quality standards, Policy 2.2.1: Wastewater treatment plants shall not be allowed to discharge directly to rivers, canals or jurisdictional wetlands unless they meet Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations and are not in violation of other Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element. Policy 2.2.2: In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of storm water run-off, storm water systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity and quality of fresh water to the estuarine system. Non-structural methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged, Policy 2.2.3: Chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme caution, The use of appropriate biological and mechanical (use of harvesting equipment to remove vegetation) controls in both the canal system and storm water detention ponds is encouraged, Manufacturers and EPA guidelines for chemical use in aquatic habitat will be followed, Policy 2.2.4: Continue and expand when needed the existing water quality monitoring program for sampling canals and rivers and assess the data annually, Policy 2.2.5: By December 31,2008, and no less than every three years, stornlwater management systems shall be inspected and certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for compliance with their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected, OBJECTIVE 2.3: All estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state and local water quality standards. Policy 2.3.1: No new untreated point source discharge shall be permitted directly to the estuarine system or rivers or canals that flow into the estuarine system, 11 Water Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption . "-"-" -_._-~-,-~~-.~.~~~__.. ..n. '"~-"._--"----_._.~--_._-~,~._--,-_._-- Policy 2.3.2: Stoffi1water systems discharging directly to estuaries shall be designed to meet the same requirements as stated in Policy 2,2.2, Policy 2.3.3: All watershed basin modification activities shall include appropriate detention and retention criteria, consistent with the rules and regulations of the South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin Board and Collier County, as may be applicable. Policy 2.3.4: Continue to implement and refine a water quality and sediment monitoring program for the estuarine system, Policy 2.3.5: Continue to have staff coordinate with the City of Naples staff regarding coordinated and cooperative planning, management. and funding programs for limiting specific and cumulative impacts on Naples Bay and its watershed, At a minimum. this agreement includes the following: a. Insure adequate sites for water dcpcndent uses, b, Prevent estuarine pollution. c, Control run-off. d, Protect living marine resources, e, Reduce exposure to natural hazards, f. Ensure public access, g. Provide a continuing lTIonitoring progranl. Policy 2.3.6: The County will only allow development activities which will not adversely impact coastal water resources, This is implemented through the following mechanisms: a, Require all applicable Federal and State pennits addressing watcr quality to be submitted to Collier County before Collier County issues a Final Development Order. b, Excluding single family homcs, any project impacting 5 acres or more of wetlands must provide a pre and post developmcnt watcr quality analysis to demonstrate no incrcase in nutrient, biochemical oxygen demand. total suspended solids. lead, zinc and copper loading in the post devclopmcnt scenario, c, By January :Z008. the County shall undcrtake an assessment of the current model used to evaluate pre and post development pollutant loadings referenced in (b) of this Policy, At a minimum, the purpose of this assessment will be to verify the accuracy ofthc model and to provide data evaluating storrnwater management structure design, In reviewing the accuracy of the model. the County will includc an evaluation of the reduction oflake depths with time and the corresponding loss ofretention volume, the impact oflake stratification, and the need for aeration, The assessment will also include the sampling of runoff from undisturbed sites and from permitted storrnwater outfalls for the parameters listed in Paragraph (b) of this Policy and pesticides, The results of the assessment and recommendations regarding the pollutant loading analysis, revisions to current model 12 TYater Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption methodology, potential regulatory restrictions, and further monitoring shall be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for further direction, Objective 2.4: Collier County shall continue taking a coordinated and cooperative approach with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regarding environmental planning, management and monitoring programs for Rookery Bay and Cape Romano - Ten Thousand Islands Aquatic Preserves and their watersheds, As part of this process, the County shall continue to notify FDEP of development projects within the watersheds of these preserve areas, Policy 2.4.1: At a minimum the County shall notify Department of Environmental Protection of proposed land development projects that could affect these preserves. Policy 2.4.2: The County shall request the Department of Environmental Protection staffto participate in the development of future coastal and watershed management plans. Policy 2.4.3: The County will request the cooperation of the Department of Environmental Protection to gather data and information needed for monitoring water quality, habitat changes and land use activities within the watersheds of these preserves. OBJECTIVE 2.5: The County will continue with the implementation of its estuarine management program by requiring development to meet its current standards addressing stomlwater management, and the protection of seagrass beds, dWle and strand, and wetland habitats, Policy 2.5.1: Identify land use activities that have the potential to degrade the estuarine environmental quality. Policy 2.5.2: This management program shall incorporate information obtained tfom the various watershed management plans described elsewhere in this Element. Policy 2.5.3: This program shall in part be based on the estuarine data analyses and management recommendations contained in the County's coastal management progranl's technical reports, Other Pertinent CCME GOPs OBJECTIVE 3.4: 13 Water Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption --'-"--""'-"~-""'~"--'-' - .-_.._.._'---_.-._--~._-_.- -.-.-"..----..-,.=- Collect and evaluate data and information designed to monitor the quality of ground water in order to identify the need for additional protection measures, (Refer to Objective 1,3 in the Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Suh-ElcmenL) Policy 3.4.2: Coordinate data gathering activities with State and Federal agencies to minimize duplication of efforts and enhance the quality of information gathered, GOAL 4: THE COUNTY SHALL CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIA TEL Y MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. OBJECTIVE 4.1: Collect and evaluate data and information designed to more accurately determine water use in Collier County such as the County's database tracking all permitted wells and wells having consumptive use pennits, Policy 4.I.l: Use as much as possible the existing reporting requirements and computer database of the South Florida Water Management District. Policy 4.1.2: Work with the agricultural community to devise a method for determining agricultural pumpage, Policy 4.1.3: Compile from appropriate local. State. Federal and private organizations the water use requirements ofthc native plant and animal community associations within the County, Objective 4.2: The Collier County Water-Sewer District and the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority will continue to promote conservation of Collier County's potable water supply and will continue to develop, implement and refine a comprehensive conservation strategy, which will identify specific goals for reducing pcr capita potable water consumption, Policy 4.2. I: Continue to rely on the South Florida Water Management District to take appropriate measures to conserve water in emergency situations. Policy 4.2.2: The County shall negotiate agreements with area golf courses to accept and use treated wastewater effluent for irrigation when and where such treated effluent is available from existing and future wastewater treatment plants, Policy 4.2.3: Identify existing and future publicly owned lands suitable for irrigation with treated wastewater dIluent. such as government building grounds, parks and highway medians. and incorporate these into future planning for cf1luent disposal. 14 Waler Resource Prolecliol1 Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoptian Policy 4.2.4: Identify existing and future privately owned lands suitable for irrigation with treated wastewater effluent, such as cemeteries, agricultural operations, nurseries and commercial/industrial parks, and incorporate these into future planning for effluent disposal. Policy 4.2.5: Evaluate and make recommendations, where appropriate, for plumbing fixtures and landscapes that are designed for water conservation purposes, GOAL 6: THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE ITS NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. Objective 6.1: The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements, The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measurable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Ovcrlay, Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural- Sett1ement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply, Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this policy shall apply to all non-agricultural dcvelopment except for single-family dwclling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2,1 of this Element. Coastal High Hazard Area Non-Coastal High Hazard Area Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres, 10% Residential and Mixed Equal to or greater Equal to or greater than 5 acres Use Dcvelopment than 2,5 acres 25% and less than 20 acres, 15% Equal to or -- 15 Water Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 Bee Adoption "---'~-----_.,_.._--""""._-----". .-- Golf Course Commercial and Less than Industrial Development . Equal to 0 than 5 acre Industrial Development (Rural- 50%. not t Industrial District only) projcct site , - greater than 20 ac. 25% ------- 350/0 35% .. - I Less than 5 acres. 5 acres. 10% 10% r greater Equal to or s. 15% , greater than 5 acres. ]5% ---_..--" o exceed 25% of the 50%, not to exceed 25% of the > i project site. -----_._--~ The following standards and criteria shall apply to the vegetation rctention requirements referenccd above. (l) For the purposc of this policy. "native vegetation" is defincd as a vegctativc community having 25% or morc canopy coverage or highcst existing vegctative strata of native plant species. Thc vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy arc calculated based on thc amount of "nativc vegctation" that confomls to this definition. (2)The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy. under-story and ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible. which may include connection to offsite preserves. The purpose for idcntifying the largest contiguous arca is to providc for a core area that has the greatest potential f()r wildlifc habitat by reducing the interface between the preserve area and development which decreases the connicts from othcr land uses. Criteria for detennining the dimensional standards of the preserve arc to be set out in the Land Development Code. (3) Areas that fulfill the nativc vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall be set aside as preserve areas. On-sitc and off-site preserve areas shall be protected by a pcrmancnt conservation mcchanism to prohibit f~lrther dcvelopmcnt. consistent with the requirements of this policy. The type ofpennancnt conservation mechanism. including conservation easements. required for a speeitlc developmcnt may vary based on preserve area size, type of development approval. and othcr factors. as set forth in the County' s land developmcnt regulations. (4) Selection of native vegetation to be rctained as prcserve areas shall renect the following criteria in descending order of priority: a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the continued use of the site by listcd species or the movement through thc site. consistent with the requirements ofl'olicy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element. 16 WaleI' Resource i'roleclion Updated far January 2011 BCC Adoption b. Xerie Serub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammoeks. Objective 6.2: The County shall proteet and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.] of this Element. Policy 6.2.1 As required by Florida Administrative Code 9J5-5.006(I)(b), wetlands identified by the] 994-95 SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series. These areas shall be verified by a jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this element, at the time of project pennitting to detennine the exact location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries. Policy 6.2.2 Wetlands shall be defined pursuant to Section 373.019 Florida Statutes. The location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries are further described by the delineation methodology 111 Section 373.42] Florida Statutes. Policy 6.2.3: Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands are protected and conserved. This wetland preservation and conservation process shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plan process, as referenced in Objective 2.1 of this Element. However, the process outlined within this policy is primarily based on directing concentrated population growth and intensive development away from large interconnected wetland systems. These wetland systems have been identified based on their type, values, functions. sizes, conditions and locations within Collier County. These systems predominantly occur east of the County's Urban boundary, as delineated on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM), within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Many of these wetlands fall within public lands or land targeted for acquisition. High quality wetlands systems located on private property are primarily protected through native vegetation preservation requirements, or through existing PUD commitments, conservation easements, or Stewardship Sending Area Designations, or via the NRP A or Sending designations within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District or land/easement acquisition, or innovative landowner incentives. Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the northeastern portion of Collier County, excluding the community of ]mmokalee, are contained in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) of the FLUE (and as depicted on the FLUM). Protection measures for wetlands and wetland systems located within the Urban and Estates designated areas of the County shall be based upon the jurisdictional detenninations made by the applicable state or federal agency. Where permits issued by such state or federal agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within Urban and Estates desib'11ated areas and require mitigation for such impacts, the pennitting agency's mitigation requirements shall be deemed to preserve and protect wetlands and their functions, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. 17 Water Resource l'rolecl;on Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption The large connected wetland systems that exist at the landscape scale in Collier County shall be protected through various Land Use Designations and Overlays that restrict higher intensity land uses and require specific land development standards for the remaining allowable land uses. Collier County shall direct incompatible land uses away from these large landscape scale wetland systems through implementation of the fiJllowing protection and conservation mechanisms: (]) Conservation Designalion Best available data indicatcs that 76% of all wetlands found in Collier County are contained within the boundaries of the Conservation Designation as depictcd on the Countywide Future Land Use Map. The ovcrall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural rcsourccs of Collicr County and their associated environmcntal, recreational. and cconomic benefits. The allowed land uses specified in the FLUE's Conservation Designation (Reference FLUE Land Use Designalion Seclion IV) will accommodate limited residential developmcnt and future non-residential development. Thcse limitations support Collicr County's comprehensive process to direct concentrated population growth and intensive land dcvelopment away from large connected wetland systems. (2) Big Cypress Area of'Crilical ,,'laIc Concern Overlay (AC 'SO Best available data indicates that 74'1'0 of the County's wctlands are within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concem Overlay. The land developmcnt regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay District. as dcpicted on thc Countywide Future Land Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the goal of directing higher intensity land uses away from wctland systems. The development standards for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Seuion Vi spccify that site alterations shall be limited to 10% of the total site. The majority of the land contained within thc ACSC is also within the Conservation Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of that Land Use Designation. (3) Nalural Resource i'roteclion Areas (l\'RPAs) Major wctland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to cstablish the NRP A Overlay District as shown on thc Future Land Use Map. and as discusscd in FLUE Land Use Designation. Section V.C. Thesc areas include high functioning wetland systems and, although portions of the NRP A Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation, represent approximately 12% of the County's wetlands. which are not located in Conservation Lands. Based on thc relatively high concentration of wetlands within NRP A dcsignated lands. incompatible land uscs shall be directed away from thcse areas. Allowablc land uses within NRP As are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 90%. (4) Rural Fringe Mixed Use DistricI Sending Lands Best available data indicates tbat 16.000+ acres of wctlands are contained within designated Sending Lands and that sueh wctlands constitute approximately 70% of land cover in these areas. Incompatible land uses are directed away from thc Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands through an incentive-bascd Transfer of Devclopment Rights (TDR) Program that allows land owncrs within these Sending Lands to transfer their residential density out of the Sending Lands to Rural Fringc Mixed Use District (and limited Urban) Receiving Lands. A complete dcscription of the TDR Program is contained in the FLUE. Futurc Land Use Designation Dcscription Section. Agricultural/Rural Dcsignation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use 18 Water Resource Prolection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption District. Incompatible land uses are also directed away from Sending Lands through restrictions on allowable uses. Finally, allowable uses within these lands are also subject to native vegetation retention and preservation standards of 80% to 90%, as required by Policy 6.7.1 of this Element. (5) Flowway Stewardship Areas Ire-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and 2002-54J Flowway Stewardship Areas have been designated within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and are shown on the Rural Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Map Series. Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs) are for the most part privately owned wetlands that are located within the Camp Keais Strand and Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands fonn the principal wetland flowway systems in the RLSA. The Overlay provides an incentive to pennanently protect FSAs through the creation and transfer of Stewardship Credits. It also contains provisions that eliminate incompatible uses from the FSAs and, which establish protection measures. (6) Walershed Management i'lans Collier County will establish watershed management plans throughout the County, but with particular emphasis on the Urban and Estates designated areas. These watershed management plans shall be established in accordance with Objective 2.] of this Element and will include the preservation or, where feasible, creation of landscape-scale wetland conservation areas to act as habitat, natural water quality treatment and water quantity retention/detention areas. The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from such large-scale wetlands. Collier County shall allow for more intensive development to occur in Rural Fringe Receiving Lands, North Golden Gate Estates, the Rural-Settlement Area District, and the Urban Designated Areas subject to the land uses identified in the Future Land Usc Element, the Immokalee Area Master Plan, and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. These areas account for only 6% of Collier County's wetlands. Except for tidal wetlands within the coastal portion of the Urban Designated Area and wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, the County finds that the wetland systems in these areas arc more fragmented and altered than those systems located within the Conservation Lands, ACSC and NRP A Overlays, and Rural Fringe Sending Lands. On a project-specific basis, wetlands and wctland functions shall be protected through the following mechanisms: (I) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland pennitting; (2) Vegetation prcservation policics supporting CCME Objective 6.]; (3) Wetland protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2; (4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE (5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, as per Objective 2.1 of this Element. (6) Land or easement acquisition. (7) Land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief, or USDA grants for restoration. 19 Waler Resource i'roteclion Updated far January 2011 BCC Adoption ~-----_._--,._-'---,--,-------,---, Policy 6.2.4: Within the Urban Designated arca, the County shall rely on the wetland jurisdictional determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable jurisdictional agcncy, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Managemcnt Plan prcservc area. Thc County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (l) Where pcnnits issued by such jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within this designated area and rcquire mitigation for such impacts, this shall be deemed to meet the objective of protection and conservation of wetlands and thc natural functions of wetlands within this area. except Cor wetlands that are part ofa Watershed Management Plan preserve area. Thc County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. (2) The County shall requirc thc appropriate jurisdictional pennit prior to the issuance of a final local development order pennitling sitc improvements, cxcept in the case of single- family residences, which are not part of an approved development or are not platted, unless the residcnces are within a watcrshed management conservation area identificd in a Watershed Management Plan devclopcd pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2. I of this Element, in which case the appropriate jurisdictional pennit is rcquired prior to the issuance of a final local devclopmcnt order pcrmitting sitc improvements. (3) Collier County will work with thc jurisdictional agencies and applicants to encourage mitigation to occur within targeted arcas of the County including, but not limitcd to: Natural Resourcc Protection Areas (NRPAs): lands targeted for a acquisition by a public or privatc conservation cntity: wctlands that are part of an approved watershed management plan, as per Objective ~.1 of this Element: and other arc as appropriate for mitigation, such as flow ways and arcas containing habitat for animal listed spccics. (4) Within the lmmokalce Urban Designated Area. there may cxist high quality wetland systems connectcd to the Lake Trafford/Camp Kcais Strand system. Thcsc wetlands require greatcr protcction measurcs than wctlands locatcd in other portions of the Urban Dcsignatcd Area, and thcreCorc the wctland protection standards set forth in Policy 6.2.5 shall apply in this area. This arca is gcnerally idcntified as the area designated as Wetlands Connccted To Lakc TralTord/Camp Keais Strand System on the Immokalec Future Land Use Map and is locatcd in the southwest Immokalee Urban designated area, connected to the Lake Trafford/Camp Kcais System. Within one (l) year of the cffective datc of thesc amendments. the County shall adopt land development regulations to determine the proccss and specific circumstances when thc provisions oCPolicy 6.~.5 will apply. Policy 6.2.5: Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and that portion of the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System which is contained within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, Collier County shall direct land uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts within wctlands bascd upon the vegetation requiremcnts of Policy 6.1.2 of this elcment, the wetland functionality assessment described in paragraph (2) below. and the final pennitting requiremcnts of the South Florida Watcr Managcmcnt District. A direct impact is hereby defined 20 Water Resource I'roleclion Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption as the dredging or filling of a wetland or adversely changing the hydroperiod of a wetland. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (l) The County shall apply the vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall be preserved as part of this vegetation requirement according to the following criteria: a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element shall be met be preserving wetlands with the highest wetland functionality scores. Wetland functionality assessment scores shall be those described in paragraph (2) of this policy. Wetlands having a WRAP score of at least 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of 0.7 shall be preserved on site. This policy is not intended in all cases to require preservation of wetlands exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.1.2 of this element. Within one year, the County shall develop specific criteria to be used to determine when wetlands having a WRAP score greater than 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of greater than 0.7 shall be required to be retained exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.].2 of this element. (2) In order to assess the values and functions of wetlands at the time of project review, applicants shall rate functionality of wetlands using the South Florida Water Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), as described in Technical Publication Reg-001, dated September 1997, and updated August] 999, or the Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method, F.A.C. Chapter 62-345. The applicant shall submit to County staff; agency accepted WRAP scores or Unifonn Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method scores. County staff shall review this functionality assessment as part of the County's EIS provisions and shall use the results to direct incompatible land uses away from the highest functioning wetlands according to the requirements found in paragraph (I) above. (3) All direct impacts shall be mitigated for pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (6) of this policy. (4) Single family residences shall follow the requirements contained within Policy 6.2.7 of this element. (5) The County shall separate preserved wetlands from other land uses with appropriate buffering requirements. The County shall require a minimum 50-foot vegetated upland buffer adjacent to a natural water body, and for other wetlands a minimum 25-foot vegetated upland buffer adjacent to the wetland. A structural buffer may be used in conjunction with a vegetative buffer that would reduce the vegetative buffer width by 50%. A structural buffer shall be required adjacent to wetlands where direct impacts are allowed. Wetland buffers shall conform to the following standards: a. The buffer shall be measured landward from the approved jurisdictional line. b. The buffer zone shall consist of preserved native vegetation. Where native vegetation does not exist, native vegetation compatible with the existing soils and expected hydrologic conditions shall be planted. c. The buffer shall be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. 21 Waler Resource i'rotection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption d. The following land uses are considered to be compatible with wetland functions and are allowed within the buffcr: I. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks and recreational shelters; 1. Pervious nature trails; 3. Water management structures; 4. Mitigation areas; 5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with thc foregoing uses. e. A structural buffer may consist of a stcm-wall. bernl, or vcgetative hedge with suitable fencing. (6) J\1itigation shall be required for direct impacts to wetlands in order to result in no net loss of wetland functions. a. Mitigation Requirements: I. "No net loss of wctland functions" shall mean that the wetland functional score of the proposed mitigation cquals or excceds the wetland functional score of the impacted wetlands. Ilowever. in no case shall the acreage proposed for mitigation bc less than the acreage bcing impacted. 2. Loss of storage or conveyance volume rcsulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall bc compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and \\"ithin or adjacent to the impacted v....'etland. 3. Protection shall be provided for prescrvcd or created wctland or upland vegetative communities olfercd as mitigation by placing a conservation easement over the land in pcrpctuity. providing for initial exotic plant removal (Class J invasive exotic plants delincd by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council) and continuing exotic plant maintenance. 4. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration. the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (6)a.1. (6)a.2, and (6)a.3 of this policy. If agency permits havc not provided mitigation consistent with this policy. Collier County will requirc mitigation excecding that of the jurisdictional agencIes. 5. Mitigation requirements for single-family lots shall be dcternlincd by the State and Federal agencies during thcir pemlitling proccss. pursuant to the requiremcnts of Policy 6.2.7 of this clement. h. Mitigation Incentives: 1. Collicr County shall encourage certain types of mitigation by providing a variety of incentivcs in the foml of density bonuses and credits to open spacc and vegetation rctention requiremcnts. Dcnsity bonuses shall be limited to no more than 10% of the allowed density. 2. Prefcrred mitigation activities that would qualify f()r thcse incentivcs include, but are not limited, to thc following: 22 JValer Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption (a) Adding wetland habitat to or restoring wetland functions within Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands, (b) Creating, enhancing or restoring wading bird habitat to be located near wood stork, and/or other wading bird colonies. 3. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier County shall adopt specific criteria in the LDC to implement this incentive program, and to identify other mitigation priorities. Policy 6.2.6: Ire-numbered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002-32 and 2002-541 Within the Urban Designation and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, required wetland preservation areas, buffer areas, and mitigation areas shall be dedicated as conservation and common areas in the fonn of conservation easements and shall be idcntified or platted as separate tracts; and, in the case of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). these areas shall also be depicted on the PUD Master Plan. These areas shall be maintained free from trash and debris and from Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Land uses allowed in these areas shall be limited to those listed in Policy 6.2.5(5)d of this element and shall not inelude any other activities that are detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control or fish and wildlife habitat conservation and preservation. Policy 6.2.7: Within the Estates Designated Area and the Rural Settlement Area, the County shall rely on the wetland jurisdictional detenninations and pennit requircments issued by the applicable jurisdictional agency, exccpt for wetlands that arc part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (1) For single-family residences within Southern Golden Gate Estates or within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. the County shall rcquire the appropriate federal and state wetland-related penn its before Collier County issues a building pem1it. (2) Outside of Southern Golden Gate Estatcs and the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concem, Collier County shall inform applicants for individual single-family building pern1its that federal and state wetland pcnnits may be required prior to construction unless the proposed residence is within a watershed management conscrvation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Elemcnt in which casc the appropriate jurisdictional pennit is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The County shall also notify the applicable federal and state agcncies of single-family building pennits applications in these areas. (3) Within North Golden Gate Estates and the Rural Settlement Area, Collier County shall incorporate certain preserved and/or created wetlands and associatcd uplands into the County's approved watershed management plans, as per Objective 2. I of this Elemcnt. The size and location of wetlands incorporated into the watershed management plans will be based upon the approved requirements for such plans. The County may issue single- family building penn its within or adjacent to such wetlands, subject to appropriate 23 Water Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption mItigation requirements, which preserve the functionality of the wetland within the applicable watershed managcment plan. For a proposed residence which is to be located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan dcveloped pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element, the appropriate jurisdictional pcnnit is rcquired prior to the issuance of a building permit. (4) Collier County shall continue to work with federal and state agencies to identify properties that have a high probability of wetlands and animal listed species occurrence. The identification process will be based on hydric soils data and other applicable criteria. Once this idcntification proccss is complete. thc County will detennine if the process is suflicicntly accurate to require federal and state wctland approvals prior to the issuance of a building pcnnit within Ihesc areas. The County shall usc infonnation on wetland and/or listed species occurrence to infonn property owners of the potential existence of wetlands and/or listcd species on thcir property. (5) Within one ycar after Watershcd Management Plans are accepted by the Board of County Commissioners. Collier County shall develop and implement additional means to protect wetland systcms idcntified in cach Plan for prescrvation or restoration. Mcans to consider include innovative landowner incentives. transferable development rights, tax rclief. land or easement acquisition. state and federal grants. and cnhanccd regulations. Policy 6.2.8 For the County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay, as designated on the FLUM, wetlands shall he prcscrvcd pursuant to thc RLSA Ovcrlay policics found in the Future Land Usc Element. Policy 6.2.9 rre-numbered 10 rejleclmergcr ojOrdinunce No. ]00]-32 und ]OO]-5~J The County shall provide for adequatc staff to implemcnt the policies supporting Objcctive 6.2. GOAL 13: THE COUNTY SHALL A VOID llNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGlJLA TORY PROGRAMS. OB.JECTIVE 13.1: To establish. prior to the adoption of any land development regulation to implcment this Elcment. including hut not limited to NRPA managemcnt guidclines and watershed managemcnt plans. a program to rcview such rcgulations and identify cxisting rcgulatory programs exercised by regional. Statc. or Fedcral agencics with jurisdiction ovcr thc activities sought to be regulated. Policy 13.1.1: There will he no unncccssary duplication of cxisting Regional. State. or Fcderal pennitting programs. Policy 13.1.2: The County may adopt regulations to strcngthen cxisting pcrmitting programs. Policy 13.1.3: 24 Wulcr Resource i'roleclion Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Prior to adopting any new regulations to implement this Element, the following guidelines shall be met: a. The regulation fulfills an important need that is not adequately addressed by existing Regional, State, or Federal regulations. b. The regulation can be effectively and efficiently administered by existing County staff or by an authorized expansion of County staff. c. The cost to the County of implementing thc regulation has been identified and considered. Other Pertinent Section GOPs Some of the following GOPs do not directly address Watershcd Management Plan goals specifically however, they address relevant issues that must be considercd and supported by the plans. PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT DRAINAGE SUB-ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION This portion of the Collier County Growth Management Plan invcntories both the natural conditions and stormwater management activities within unincorporated Collier County. In Collier County, thcre are two (2) primary service providers with regard to the provision of storm water managemcnt services. The County's Transportation Services Division maintains drainage systems associatcd with County and State Roadways as well as the Secondary Drainage System. The Big Cypress Basin Board, an arm of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), maintains the larger, regional surface watcr management systems within Collier County. Thc regional drainage system is also referred to as the Primary Drainage System. Howcver, management of stormwatcr is concerned not only with flood prevention (a quantity issue), but also with the removal of various pollutants picked up by the stormwater as it flows across the County's developed land areas (a quality issue). Such pollutants can include oils, greases, heavy metals, pesticides, fertilizers and other substances, which can have a deleterious impact on the County's natural systems and, above all, its groundwater quality. Note that, in this respect, there is overlap in the intcnded purpose between the Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Rccharge Sub- elements: both seck to protect aquifer rechargc areas. Howcver, the emphasis of the Drainage Sub-element is on surface water protection, whereas the emphasis of the Natural Groundwatcr Aquifer Rccharge Sub-elemcnt is on groundwater protection. The term "stormwater management" refers to a set of comprehensive strategies for dealing with both stormwater quantity and stormwater quality issues. The primary componcnt of these strategies is the need to ensure that the volume, rate, timing and pollutant load of stormwater runoff after development is similar to that which occurred prior to development. To accomplish this task, stormwater managemcnt entities employ a 25 Waler Resource i'rolect;on Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption combination of structural and non-structural techniques. Non-structural techniques emphasize preservation or restoration of natural drainage features to promote infiltration, filtering and slowing of runoff. Structural techniques include the variety of man made channels and control structures maintained within the primary and sccondary drainage systems. Thc objective of stormwater management is to develop a combination of techniqucs which provide for adequate pollutant removal and flood protection in the most economical manner. One of the key principles of current stormwater management techniques is recognition of the need for basin-wide (or watershed basin) planning. Thc stormwater management system has to be designed so as to cnsure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstrcam portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design. Subsequent development upstream must then utilize stormwater management techniques and systems, which will maintain predevelopment run-off conditions so that the capacity of the downstream portion of the watershed is not cxceeded. In this respect, therc is an overlap between thc intendcd purpose of the Drainage Sub- clement and Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, including the Watcrshed Management Plans discussed under Objective 2.1 of the CCME. GOAL: COLLIER COUNTY SHALL PROVIDE DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING "VATERS AND SLJRR()UND1NG NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. OBJECTIVE I (CAPITAL FACILITY PLANNING FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS): The County shall utilize the Allliual Updatc and Invcntory Report on Public Facilities (AUlR) process to update the Drainage Atlas Maps and Channel/Structure Inventory components of the adopted Watcr Management Mastcr Plan and to vcrify the existing watcrshed basin boundarics within Collier County. The County will also verify the design storm capacity of thc drainagc facilities within each basin, and detennine the costs neccssary to maintain thc facility capacities to selected design stonn standards. This inJemnation shall bc used to program opcrational funds in the Annual County Budget and to identify necessary capital projects and basin studies in the Annual Capitallmprovcment Element Updatc and Amcndment. Policy 1.1 : The County shall update and revise stonnwater management maintenance proccdures and capital projects based on continual facilities pcrfom1ancc monitoring activities. Consideration will be given to natural systems as identified in Policy 2.1.4 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, existing developmcnts and proposed developments. Policy 1.2: 26 IVuter Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption County drainage system capital facility planning shall be designed to implement procedures and projects in a manner to ensure that adequate storm water management facility capacity is available at the time a development permit is issued, or that such capacity will be available when needed to serve the development. Policy 1.3: The County shall continue to develop public drainage facilities, which maintain the groundwater table as a source of recharge for the County's potable water aquifers, provide a source of irrigation water for agricultural, horticultural and golf course operations and provide water to native vegetation. Policy 1.4: The County sball continue to evaluate structural and non-structural measures for restoring historical hydroperiods in impacted watersheds where possible and for reducing the impacts of canal and stormwater discharges to estuaries. Selected measures will be implemented through the watershcd management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Managemcnt Element ofthe Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.5: Watershed Management Plans will be undertaken as set forth in Objective 2.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). After each plan is completed, the results will be made available to the property owners located within the basin's boundaries for their use in petitioning the Board of County Commissioners to create a taxing/assessment unit to fund the proposed implementation of the plan"s rccon1mendations. Until the \rVatershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the interim standards for development as contained in CCME Objective 2.1. OBJECTIVE 2: The County shall maintain adopted drainage level of servicc standards for basins and sub- basins identified in the Water Managemcnt Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage level of service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed management planning process idcntified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Managemcnt Element of this Growth Managcment Plan. Policy 2.1: The following levels of service for drainage are hereby adopted for the purpose of issuing development pennits. Upon completion of each associated Watershed Management Plan, the level of service will be modified, if warranted. A. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinance Numbers 74-50, 90-] 0 and 2001 -27, and Land Development Code Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended. 27 Waler Resource i'rotection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption B. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing Levels of Service identified (by design stonn return frequency event) by the completed Water Management Master Plan as follows: LEVELS OF SERVICE A TT AINED BY BASINS BASIN LEVEL OF SERVICE MAIN GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM Main Golden Gate Canal Basin o Cypress Canal Basin D Harvey Canal Basin o Grcen Canal Basin Airport Road Canal South Basin Corkscrew Canal Basin Oranoe Tree Canal Basin b 951 Canal Central Basin C o o D C DISTRICT NO.6 SYSTEM Rock Creek Basin C-4 Canal Basin Lely Main Canal Basin Lely Canal Branch Basin Lely Manor Canal Basin Haldeman Creek Basin Winter Park Outlet Basin o C D o D o D COCOHATCHEE RIVER SYSTEM Cocohatchce River Basin Pinc Ridge Canal Basin Palm River Canal Basin West Branch Cocohatchee Rivcr Basin East Branch Cocohatchee River Basin Airport Road Canal North Basin 951 Canal North Basin o C D C [) D o GORDON RIVER EXTENSION Gordon River Extension Basin Goodlette-Frank Road [)itch Basin D D 28 Woler Resource i'roleclion Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption HENDERSON CREEK BASIN Henderson Creek Basin D OBJECTIVE 5: The County shall continue to regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended). Policy 5.1: Collier County shall periodically review all appropriate Water Management Ordinances and regulations to determine their effectiveness in protecting the functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Policy 5.2: Based upon the periodic review described in Policy 5.1, the County shall develop any appropriate new ordinances and regulations that are necessary to ensure protection of the functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwatcr aquifer recharge areas. OBJECTIVE 6: The County shall protcct the functions of natural drainage fcatures through the application of standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stormwater management systems. Implementation of this Objcctive will be consistent with the watershed managcment planning process identified within Goal 2 and Objective 2. I of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Managemcnt Plan. This objective is made measurable through the following policies: Policy 6.1: Projects shall be designed and operated so that off~site discharges will mect State water quality standards, as set forth in Chapter 62-302.300, F.A.C., as it existed at the date of project approval. Policy 6.2: Collier County's retention and detention requircments shall be the same as those provided in the South Florida Water Management District's Basis of Review, as it existed at the time of project approval. Policy 6.3: Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. The allowable off-site discharge rates are as follows: a. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfs/acre (North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) 29 Water Resource Prolection Updated far January 2011 BCC Adoption ..,-_._'---_._--_._---~..~,-_."'_..,"'--'".....~.._.~-_...."'_....._._~ 0.06 cfs/acre b. Airport Road South Sub-basin (South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) c. Cocohatchee Canal Basin d. Lely Canal Basin e. Harvey Basin f. Wiggins Pass Basin g. All other areas 0.04 cfs/acre 0.06 cfs/acre 0.055 cfs/acrc 0.13 cfs/acre 0.15 cf's/acre The County may exempt projects fTom these allowable off~site discharge rates if any of the following applies: 1. The project is exempt from allowablc on~sitc discharge limitations pursuant to Section 40E-400.31 5. FAC. 2. The project is part of an existing SFWMD permit. which allows discharge rates different than those listcd above. 3. It can be documented that the project currently discharges oft-site at a rate higher than those listed above. The documcntation required for this purposc shall be prepared by a registered profcssional engineer. and will consist of an engineering study which utilizcs the applicable criteria in thc "SFWMD Basis of Rcview for Environmental Resource Permit Applications". The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and SFWMD staff. The study shall include the following site-spccific infi.1fI11ation: a. b. c. d. c. 1". " "'. h. Topography Soil types and soil storage volume Vegetation typcs Antecedent conditions Design rainfall hydrograph Depression storage capacity Receiving water hydro graph, and Other relevant hydrologic and hydraulic data. Using the above jnfiJrmation, a hydrologic and hydraulic model shall be developcd which demonstrates the higher off-site discharge rate. PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 30 J;Vatel' Resource Protection Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption Potable Water Sub-Element I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Potable Water Sub-Element is to provide for the health and safety of the residents of Collier County by ensuring adequate potable water supply and distribution facilities that are cost-effective and environmentally sound. Such facilities may be provided through the Collier County Water-Sewer District, private utilities, other public utilities that operate within portions of the unincorporated County, or (in certain areas) private supply wells. In addition to the supply and distribution of potable water for residential and commercial purposes, the Potable Water Sub-Element also contains provisions related to establishment of new potable water sources, water conservation, and irrigation. Goal, Objectives and Policies Potable Water Sub-Element GOAL: TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENT ALL Y SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE POTABLE WATER FACILITIES AND SERVICES. OBJECTIVE] : The County shall locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable water supply sources and the acquisition ofland necessary for such development shall be based upon the infonnarion, guidelines and proccdures idcmified within the County's Tcn-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated annuafly), the Collier County Water-Sewer Master Plan, and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. Policy 1.1: The County shall continue to expand the ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recovery) system as a potential emergency and seasonal potable water source. Policy 1.2: The County shall continue to implement a program for the protection of existing and potential potable water supply sources. Policy 1.3: The County shall continue to identify sufficient quantities of water sources to meet the County's estimated growth-related needs. Potential water sources to meet the County's 2025 water demands include raw water from Ha",thorn Zone I Aquifer (Intennediate Aquifer System) and Lower Hawthom Aquifer (Florida Aquifer System). identified within the County's 2005 Water Master Plan. The County shall use these water sources as wcll as alternativc sources, as pennitted by the State, to meet the County's needs. Policy] .4: 31 Water Resource Proteclion Updated far January 2011 BCC Adoption _'_"H_~""_"'_'____""'''M'_'~''_''_--,_",~_____-"-,",,-,_,_,,__~~~~._. Thc County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District and other regulatory agencies in implcmenting effcctive linkages between gro'W1h management and water planning. Policy 1.5: The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District in the development of the Watcr Master Plan Update, which is the primary planning document for the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Policy 1.6: The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Managcl1lcnt District to produce future plans for water supply as dcscribed within the Water Master Plan Updates that ensure the County's ability to maintain its staled Level of Service standard. PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Natural Groundwater Aquifer Rechargc Sub-Element I. INTRODUCTION The Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-Elemcnt establishes the manner in which Collicr County will identify and protect the natural groundwater aquifers that serve as thc primary sources of drinking watcr for County rcsidcnts and visitors. This Sub- Element relates only to those aquifer recharge areas located in unincorporated Collicr County that serve as potable watcr welllields. The Implementation Section of this Sub-Element contains a single Goal, divided into five (5) Objectives. Beneath each Objective are the specific County implcmenting policies. The watcr supply protection Objectives in this Sub-Element include: . Mapping and deiincation oCnatural aquifer rccharge areas: . Protcction of ground 'Water quality: . . Groundwatcr quality monitoring: . Public education with regard to groundwater protcction issues; and, . Protection of critical recharge areas and groundwatcr resourccs. GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQlJIFER RECHARGE SUB-ELEMENT GOAL: THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQlJIFER RECHARGE AREAS FROM ACTIVITIES THAT COULD DEGRADE AND/OR CONT AMINA TE THE QUALITY OF GROUNDW A TER. OBJECTIVE 1: (MAPPING AND DELINEATION OF RECHARGE AREAS) Thc County shall continuc to review every t'Wo years, and rcvise as ncccssary. existing map delineations of County potablc water well fields that arc most sensitivc to contamination from nearby land developmcnt and othcr surface activitics. The bielmial review and any subsequent map revisions will be based on geologic. hydrogeologic. hydrologic. and updated anthropogenic contaminant data aggregated sincc the previous reVISIon. 32 Waler Resource Prolecliol1 Updated far January 2011 BCC Adoption Policy 1.1: The County shall revise and update its 3-dimensional computer models of ground water now around public water supply wellfields, as additional data (e.g., withdrawal rates, numbers and locations of wells within wellfields, and hydrogeologic information) become available. Policy 1.2: The County shall identify those County potable water wellfields, or portions of well fields, which are susceptible to contamination, caused by adjacent or nearby land uses, drainage patterns, geomorphic conditions, soil properties, and/or hydrogeologic factors, including the presence or absence of confining units. This infonnation shall be revised and updated as necessary. Policy 1.3: The County shall maintain and update data on existing land uses and land use activities that possess the greatest potential for ground water contamination. Policy 1.4: The County shall maintain and update its maps of sensitive recharge areas as additional anthropogenic and hydrogeologic information becomes available. Policy 1.5: This Sub-Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the Surficial and Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and Hawthome Aquifers, as described in the South Florida Water Management District's official publications dated April, 2000 (and scheduled to be published in 2006). OBJECTIVE 2: (PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY) Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards. Policy 2. i: The County shall prohibit discharges to sinkholes or other karst related features that have direct hydrologic conncctions to the Surficial or Intennediate Aquifer Systems. Policy 2.2: Non-agricultural developments requiring an Environmental Resources Pennit from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall preserve groundwater recharge characteristics as required by the SFWMD and as set forth in the SFWMD's Basis for Review, dated January 2004 and as regularly updated. Ground water recharge shall also be protected through the application of the retention/detention requirements and allowable off-site discharge rates for non-agricultural developments specified in Policies 6.2 and 6.3 in the Drainage Sub-Element. Policy 2.3: The County standards for protecting the quality of ground water recharge within the wellhead protection areas identified in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) shall be those provided in Policy 3.1.1 of the Conscrvation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 2.4: Collier County shall evaluate the necessity for adopting more stringent ground water recharge standards for High or Prime Recharge areas within 2 years of the SFWMD Goveming Board's adoption of such areas. OBJECTIVE 3: (GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING) The County shall continue to collect and evaluate ground water quality data, identifying ambient water quality values and trends, comparing analyzed concentrations to Florida Ground Water Guidance Concentrations, 33 Wafer Resource Proleclion Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption and providing infonnation to water resources planning and management entities, and to the general public. Policy 3.1: The County shall continuc its existing watcr quality monitoring program to provide baseline data, evaluate 10ng-tcrnl trends, idcntify water quality problems. and evaluate the effectiveness of the County's ground water protection program. Policy 3.2: The County shall coordinate data gathering activities with State and Federal agencies to minimize duplication of efforts and enhance the quality of information gathered. Policy 3.3: The County will annually assess its groundwater quality monitoring data to detennine whether monitoring activities and County Ordinances require expansion. modification or reduction. Policy 3.4: The County shall continually gather and evaluate appropriate data for the purpose of rcfining and improving the groundwater quality monitoring database us cd in the County's 3- dimensional ground water model. Policy 3.5: Collier County shall continue to conduct water resource planning with appropriate County, City of Naples, and SFWMD staJfto provide for ground water resource development. utilization. and conservation. OBJECTIVE: 4: (PUBLIC EDUCATION WITH REGARD TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION ISSUES) The County shall continue currcnt activities of providing the public with educational materials concerning ground water protection issues in Collicr County. These may include. hut shall not be limited to. the preparation of annual technical publications of ground water quality data, an informational website for groundwater quality issues. gencral infonnation publications. establishment of a speakcrs' bureau. K - 12 classroom presentations, and in-service teacher workshops and scminars. Policy 4.1: The County shall continuc to advise thc public on the appropriate disposal methods for hazardous wastes, for thc purpose of reducing or avoiding the potcntial for groundwater contamination. In performing this task. the County may utilize the public educational mcasures listed within Objective 4 of this Sub-Element. or an} other mcasurcs which may be appropriatc. Policy 4.2: The County shall continue to provide infomlation in a manner that can be understood by the general public regarding Collicr County's groundwater system. its vulnerability to contamination and measures necded to protcct itlrom contamination. In perfonning this task, thc County may utilize the public educational measures listed within Objective 4 of this Sub- Elemcnt, or any other measures which may bc appropriate. OBJECTIVE 5: (PROTECTION OF CRITICAL RECHARGE AREAS AND GROUNDW A TER RESOURCES) The County shall implement plans to preserve critical ground water recharge areas and ground water resources. and will review, evaluate, and revise (if 34 Waler Resource Prolecliol1 Updated far January 2011 BCC Adoption warranted) those plans and actions, based on the best available geologic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and anthropogenic contaminant data. Policy 5.1: The County shall develop, and continually update, technical criteria for detennining those recharge areas, which are critical to the County's long-tenn ground water needs. Policy 5.2: The County shall continue to identify critical recharge areas and appropriate protective mechanisms. Policy 5.3: The County shall continue to identify costs, funding mechanisms and private property rights issues associated with the protection of critical recharge areas. Policy 5.4: The County shall continue to operate the petroleum storage tank inspection program, especially in identified wellfield protection zones, operating within available State Funding 35 Wafer Resource i'roleclion Updated for January 2011 BCC Adoption ~'"'-"'-~""""---.'~~---'~'--"""'-=-"-'''--'.''-'~--~''-'~-~.-._-~, RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT STATEMENT OF ISSUE The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) is the Future Land Use Element Sub-District which was adopted in 2002 through Ordinance 02-32, as a result of Final Order - ACC-99-002. ISSUE BACKGROUND ACC-99-002 was issued by the State due to the County's GMP being found to lack regulatory protection for environmentally sensitive property, not adequately discouraging urban sprawl and preventing the premature conversion of agricultural land. The Final Order required the following modifications to the GMP to address the issucs within three specified areas: 1. Identify and propose measures to protect prime agricultural areas. 2. Direct incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat in order to protect water quality and quantity and maintain the natural water regime as well as to protect listed animal species and their habitats. 3. Assess the growth potential of the Area by assessing the potential conversion of rural lands to other uses, in appropriate locations, while discouraging urban sprawl, directing incompatible land uses away from critical habitat and encouraging development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques including, but not limited to, public and private schools, urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based allocations, clustering and open space provisions and mixed use development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District was designed to address the above specified areas of concern. The District. as identified on Future Land Use Map, consists of approximately 93,600 acres. Significant portions of the District are adjacent to the urbanized area as well as the semi-rural, rapidly developing; large-lot North Golden Gate Estates platted lands. Agricultural land uses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District do not represent a significant portion of the County's active agricultural lands. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides a transition between the Urban and Estates Designated lands and between the Urban and Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) and Conservation designated lands farther to the east. As of June 2002. the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District consisted of more than 5,550 tax parcels, and included at least 3,835 separate and distinct property owners. Alternative land use strategies were developed for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in part, to consider these existing owncrship patterns. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District employs a balanced approach, including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property rights, providing for large areas of open space, and al!ow'ing, in designated areas, appropriate types, density and intensity of development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District allows for a mixture of urban and rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and sewer, schools, recreational facilities, commercial uses and essential services deemed necessary to serve the residents of the District. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is separated into three specific areas, Sending Lands, Neutral Lands, and Receiving Lands. Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. The permitted uses within the Sending Lands are limited to a narrow list of pennitted and conditional uses and the regulations allow residential density at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 40 acres or one dwelling unit per lot or parcel ofless than 40 acres, which existed on I RIlRA!. 1"RINn1" MTYF'f) 11<;1" nT<;TRTrT (f?1"MTTnI or before June 22, 1999 (lots <5 acres which existed as of October 15, 1974 or January 5, 1982, depending upon location). Neutral Lands have been identified for limitcd semi-rural rcsidcntial development. Available data indicates that Neutral Lands have a higher ratio of native vegetation, and thus higher habitat values, than lands designated as Receiving Lands, but these values do not approach those of Sending Lands. Therefore, these lands are appropriate for limited development, if such development is directed away ti-om existing native vcgetation and habitat. A lower maximum gross density is prescribed for Neutral Lands when compared to Rcceiving Lands. Additionally, certain other uses permitted within Receiving Lands are not authorized in Neutral Lands and the area allows a maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 gross acres (0.2 units per acrc). The density allotted to the area prior to the adoption of the Receiving Lands are those lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District that have been identified as being most appropriate for development and to which residential development units may be transferred from areas designated as Sending La..llds. Based on the evaluation of available data. these lands have a lesser degree of environmental or listed species habitat value than areas designated as Sending and generally have been disturbed through development, or previous or existing agricultural operations. Various incentives are employed to direct development into Receiving Lands and away from Sending Lands. thereby maximizing nativc vegetation and habitat preservation and restoration. Such incentives include. but are not limited to: thc TDR process; clustered development; density bonus incentives; and. provisions for ccntral sewer and water. Within the Receiving Lands the base residential density allowable is one (1) unit per fivc (5) gross acres (0.2 dwelling units per acre). The maximum density achicvable in Rccciving Lands through the TDR process is one (1) dwelling unit per acre, with a minimum project size of 40 contiguous acres. This maximum density is exclusive of the Density Blending provisions. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as noted, has been regulatory constructed to steer development away from environmentally valuable land and to the areas designated Receiving Lands. The areas designated Rcceiving will be the arcas which will require the greatest outlay for infrastructure improvemcnts. Within each of the four Rccciving arcas. the FLUE allows the development of a single Rural Village, which by regulation must be located where public infrastructure exists or is planned, and shall have direct access to a roadway classified by Collier County as an arterial or collector roadway, or access to the Village may be via new collector roadway directly accessing an existing arterial, the cost of which shall be bomc cntirely by the developcr. Additionally. a Rural Village may only be approved after demonstration that the Village will be fiscally neutral or positive to county taxpayers outside of the Village. These provisions of the regulations attempt to ensure that the highest intensity development allowed by the Rural Fringe Mixed Usc District will have in place or identified the means for funding the capital improvcments neccssary in maintaining thc Level of Service (LOS) required by the GMP. The 2005 Residential Build-Out Study anticipated a total of 57.644 people or f 9,433 dwelling units for the RFMUD. The Collier Intcractive Growth Model (CIGM) projects a total of 34,837 people or 1 1.769 dwelling units. The population or either projection will require extensive infrastructure to satisfy the demands of the anticipated population. The regulatory component of within the FLUE provides for a means in which the most intense dcvelopmcnt allowed within this District. Rural Villages, are required to provide the funding f()r the capital improvements necessary to maintain the County required adopted level of service for public facilities and services. Comprehensive Plan Implementation &Program Assessment As noted the RMUD was established based on the principal of preserving environmentally sensitive lands, discouraging urban sprawl, promoting mixed use. protecting listed species and their habitats, , RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) while respecting the property rights inherent to the property owners within the sub-district. The assessment on the following page provides for analysis to better detennine if the goals and objectives of the RFMUD are being met. TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TO DATE - FY2003-201O Processed Pendin/! Process Total Acres Number of Acres enrolled in TOR Program 3.520.00 95.00 3.615.00 Number of Base TOR Credits 722.00 20.00 742.00 Number of Bonus TOR Credits 722.00 20.00 742.00 Number of R&M TOR Credits 290.00 17.00 307.00 Number of Conveyance Credits 220.00 17.00 228.00 Total Credits in Program: 1.954.00 74.00 2.019.00 Total Credits Redeemed: 300.00 TOR CREDIT5 YET TO BE REDEEMED: 1. 719.00 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RlGHTS- POn:NTIAL Unprocessed Potential Number of Acres TOTAL 17.002.00 Potential Number of Base Credits 3,448.00 Potential Number of Bonus Credits 3,448.00 Potential Number of R&M Credits 3,448.00 Potential Number of Conveyance Credits 3,448.00 POTENTIAL CREDITS TOTAL 13.800.00 All of the above have been rounded to the next highest figure There are a total of 20,617 acres which are designated sending that have been designate eligible to sever their development right. It should be noted that this acreage does not include all designated sending lands due to those lands being in public ownership and not eligible for the TDR program. Of the 20,617 acres, 17.5 percent or 3,615 acres have had or are in the process of having their TDR's separated through voluntary participation in the program. Based upon the above estimates there are potentially 15,819 TDR's, of which 12.7 percent or 2,019 TDR's have been generated through participation in the program. Of the 2,019 TDR's which have been generated to date, 300 TDR's or 14.8 percent of the TDR's generated have bcen redeemed. The TDR program became effective, due to Icgal challenges in 2003, so the program has been in existence for less than seven years, with 3 RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) participation in the three mentioned areas all within the 12 to 18 percent participation range. Based upon the information available regarding existing TDR programs, the Collier TDR program can be vicwed as active and achieving the stated purpose. In a November 30, 2004 memorandum from Dr. James Nicholas to Marti Chumbler rcgarding the proposed additional TDR credits being proposed at the time. Dr. Nicholas references two of the more successful prob'Tams in the county, Montgomery County Maryland and New Jersey Pinelands. Both programs are approaching 25 years and for the Montgomery County program 60 percent of possible TDR's have been severed and for Pinelands, just fewer than 50 percent oflands have participated. If the Collier program was extrapolated on a straight line based upon the fact that ]2.7 percent of the total potential TDR's have been created, extending out 25 years or 3.5 times the current length of the Collier program, the participation rate would be 7,210 TDR's generated or 45 percent of the total 15.81 9 potential TDR's. This participation rate would place Collier's program along side of the Pinewoods program, but behind the Montgomery County program, but a successful program based upon the matrix established. The following asscssment attempts to evaluate the RFMlJD regarding the number of TDR's and the acreage designated Receiving. Four ,Receiving Areas TDR eXDenditure characteristics Non Village Maximum density] unit per acre whcn utilizing TDR's Minimum 40 acres need 32 TDR's lOenablc. Villagc 3 Aflowed at maximum 1,500 acrcs @ 3 max DlJ pcr acre I Allowed at maximum 2,500 acres @ 3 max DU per acrc Total 7,000 acrcs iq) 3 DU per acrc - Maximum 21.000 DU 1,400 DU associated with Base Density 7,000 TDRS to enable 14,000 DUs bascd on Rural Villagc Bonus Credit Provision Sub-total 7.000 TDRs used to enable 15,400 DlJ's 5.600 Additional TDRs nccd to enable maximum dcnsitv Estimated that a total of 12,600 TDRs needed to cnable maximum density and size for allowed Rural Villages' 'numbcr ofTDRs need cd will bc deereased slightly by density associated (1 DU per 5 acres) with required greenbelt encompassing village. Total receiving Land - 22.020 acres Potential TDRs -15.809 Less developed land - 5.201 TDRs for Max Village -12,600 Less acres of potential Village - 7.000 Remaining Acres - 9,819 Remaining Potential TDRs -3.209 Rcmaining 3,209 TDRs could enable 4.011 acres of additional recciving land @ I DU per acre. -! RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE JJlSTRICT (RFMUD) Total - 5,808 acres of receiving land could not participate in the prugmmdue to il,ll expenditure Df potential TOR credits. From the above analysis, it can be determined that there are fill adequate number of IDR 's potentiallj in the system to enable the 74% of the eligible receive lands. It should be noted that the program \;[10-; not designed for 100% participation. Additionally, 5,2(J! acres of receiving land is currentl, developed with residential, commercial. industrial and institutional uses (see map on the ti.lIlowing page). With these two additional data sets considered within the evaluation it can be concluded that there is a sufticient number ofTDR's and potential TDR's within the program. ~ eo....~ RURAL FRINGE IMMOKALEE RD MIXED USE DISTRICT ~"F""'I"( C,-=:] ;,l:I"~"'.I': '.,'-j ,':""C:-:l ,'J ~"::'- r"';..,_ .. I,~~'!: \~,",'~F''': i-I ' CR 858 Developed Residential: , 1 797 Acres Developed Commerci<Jt: 2 825 ACl'dS Developed Industrial 532 Acres Developed Institutional: 47 Acres RANDALL BLVD o ::; ro z o if> ~ GOLDEN GATE BLVD ~ o ::; ro o 'u o if> W o o > ~ ro if> W o ::i to 0: W > W : o 1_25 25 lVliIes 5 RURA r FRINGE MIXED lJ.,)E Df.')TRfCT rRFMUDi ---...------.--- The below map shO\\ thc program ~ct;\it).:ls "\ell as the public ,mTlcrship pattern \\ilhin the Rl-';\ll'!). a~". Cour.t.y - ~ - / r; / / , I. J' J p-- I () RURAL FRINGF: MIX1W USE DISTRICT IRFM(JI)) The TDR Program Activity map, particularly for the South Belle Meade area, shows how the program is furthering the state and local effort to protect the designated sending lands, which in the case of the South Belle Meade area forms a natural extension of the Picayune Strand State Forest. The Public owned land is shown in green. The conclusion from the RFMUD analysis is that the program has been effective in accomplishing the specified goals of the sub-district, as well as the Final Order, which promoted the creation of the RFMUD. This assessment does not align with the public comments received at the public participation meetings held in early 2010. Those comments are provided for below. . Adjustment to Transfer of Development Rights (2005) program not producing desired result. Wholesale comment on Overlay . Application process for severances & Iransfers not fair to all receiving agencies. Land Development Code . Need more ~pecifics of Land Management Plan required for TDR credit No.3. Cost associated with severance process prohibited. Land Development Code . The County should develop a unified LMP/or area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay . County should be studying ideas for TDR's to be applied beyond RFMUD. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions . County should be studying ideas to have a TDR education program. Programmatic . TDR 's should be open to be used in Urban Area. Future Land Use Element - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Overlay-Additional TDR Provisions . Look at Marion County TDR Program. Informational . Don't use Golden Gate Eslales as Ihru-wayfor access to Ihe coast. ObservationaL . Don't build roads in advance of development and population. Observational. . TDR program is inefficient. Observational. . TDR program doesn't incent tran~fers sufficiently fFJr developers. Future Land LIse Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . Envisioned markelfor TDR's is non-existent (don't sell) ObservationaL . Further incent transfers into urhan infill (clause is unclear and needs to be expanded). Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . i'rovide further incenlives ji-om sending to receiving. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . Rural villages envisioned within receiving areas don 'I provide sufficient commercial capacity. ObservationaL . Design and criteria for commercial locations within the villages isolale them ji-om major transportation corridors (making Ihem nol viahle) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD. . No new high speed (> 36 mph) road~ buill in RLSA and Rural Fringe Sending Areas (low speed essential for wildlife preservalion) Observational . RLSA and RFMUD need 10 be compatible with Golden Gate Master Plan. Observational. . When RFMUD was crealI'd, land use restriclions eliminatedfunctionalily of Golden Gate Master Plan - Ex: Proposed location for eslates commercial. ObservationaL . Receiving Areas in the RFMUD need to he changed to allow services including husiness, commercial and industrial can he located there 10 supporl not only Ihe RFMUD, hut adjacent Golden Gate Eslales and surrounding Communities. Observational . TDR Program not working. Observational . Not enough TDR's 10 use fiJr densily in Receiving Land~. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD 7 RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) . Allow other uses on Receiving Land~ (Non-residential). Future Land Use Element (FLUE) RFMUD . RFMUD Plan nol compalible with Estates Master Plan. Losl commercial opportunilies fiJr the Estates due 10 RFAIUD Plan. Observational . Allow owners of Receiving Lands to convert a portion of those lands to Sending Lands in order to get more TDRs 10 use on Iheir remaining Receiving Lands. This process should be available Ihrough a rezoning-like process rather than requiring a comprehensive plan amendment. Programmatic . Increase the TDR Credits formula for Base TDRs to more Ihan the current one (I) base TDR per .five (5) acres. In designated Receiving Areas allow a density of grealer than one unit per acre with the use of TDRs and not limit density above one unit per acre to only Rural Villages. Non- villages should be able 10 go up to 2 unils per acre. Like the RLSA, rural villages should be able to go 10 4 units per acre. Programmatic . Remove/modifY Ihe very detailed and unworkahle requirements .thr developmenl of a Rural Village. Increase the TDR Bonus mulliplier in a Rural Village to make it economically viable. At the present lime, Ihe TDR program is 100 expensive fiJr a higher dense village. As density increases, average prices come down. Programmatic . Remove Ihe minimum required purchase amount of S25JJOO fiJr a Base TDR and instead lellhe market work 10 delermine TDR prices. Programmatic . i'rotect existing TDR holders hut drastically revamp the current program such that it is less costly /0 develop in receiving areas. Programmatic . Encourage Ihe eSlablishment of mitigation hanks in the Rural Fringe for listed .\pecies. Programmatic : Another option to consider is to estahli.;;h ."leparale overll;Y5'; Jilr each (~r the four di.s'tinct Rural Fringe development areas, similar to the North Belle Meade Overlay which has its own set of development slandards. Programmatic . The current Rural Fringe provisions of the GMi' already call fiJr the County to consider the feasihilily ofeslablishing a "TDR Bank" to he administered hy the Counly or some olher non~fiJ1'- profit government, or quasi governmental agency with the objective (Jfmakingfunds available to supporllhe TDR program hy offering initial minimal purchase prices ofTDR credits. The Counly should creale a TDR bank. Programmatic . Consider allowing owners o(/arge Iract.\' in the Rural Fringe Ihe oplion of ulilizing Ihe slandards and procedures oflhe RL~"'A program. Programmatic . Allowfbr Ihe ahilily to lransfer a certain percenlage ofdensily creditsFom Ihe RLSA 10 the Rural Fringe. Programmatic . There is a need to have dijferenl more favorable Ireatmentfi.Jr owners of Sending Land parcels of twenly (20) acres or less tofiJcilitate Iheir parlicipation. Programmatic 8 RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DIS1RICT (RFMUD) The majority of the comments are not housed or applicable to the RFMUD as provided for within the Future Land Use Element, but rather could be classified as observational, programmatic or provided for within the Land Development Code. There is an undercurrent or commonality to the comments related to demand, perceived lack of demand and the need to further incentives the program to increase demand. From all factors evaluated, staff can conclude that the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District has been effective in protecting the environmentally sensitive properties within the designated sending areas and to a limited degree allowed for market utilization of available TDR's, but based upon the public comments, there appears to be dissatisfaction with the market response to the program. The reasons behind this perception can be explained by a number of micro and macro conditions, but regardless of the reason, staff believes that a public review process of the RFMUD should be conducted prior to the County's next EAR. 9 RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) .'." ._~'-"""'-~--'---'-~'~-"---~'----""~'"~._---"'~"'~" RURAL LANDS STEWARDSHIP AREA (RLSA) OVERLAY SUB-DISTRICT STATEMENT OF ISSUE The Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay is the Future Land Use Element Sub-District which was adopted in 2002 through Ordinance 02-54, as a result of Final Order - ACC-99-002. ISSUE BACKGROUND ACC-99-002 was issued by the State due to the County's GMP being found to lack regulatory protection for environmentally sensitive property, not adequately discouraging urban sprawl and preventing the premature conversion of agricultural land. The Final Order required the following modifications to the GMP to address the issues within three specified areas: I . IdentitY and propose measures to protect prime agricultural areas 2. Direct incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland hahitat in order to protect water quality and quantity and maintain the natural water regime as well as to protect listed animal species and their habitats. 3. Assess the growth potential of the Area by assessing the potential conversion ofrural lands to other uses, in appropriate locations, while discouraging urban sprawl, directing incompatible land uses away from critical hahitat and encouraging development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques including, but not limited to, public and private schools, urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based allocations, clustering and open space provisions and mixed use development. Comprehensive Plan Implementation & Program Assessment As noted the RLSA was established based on the principal of preserving environmentally sensItIve lands, discouraging urban sprawl, promoting mixed use, protecting listed species and their habitats, while respecting the rights inherent to the property owners within the sub-district. The RLSA as expressed in the Future Land Use Element contains one goal and one objective, which are furthered by 5 policy groups. The goal of the RLSA is: Collier County seeks to address the long-term needl' of residents and property owners within the Immokalee Area Study houndary of the Collier County Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment. Collier County's goal is to protect agricultural activities, 10 prevent the premature conversion of agricultural land to non- agricultural uses, to direct incompatihle uses away from wetlands and upland habitat, to enable the conversion of rural land 10 other uses in appropriate locations, to discourage urhan sprawl, and to encourage development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques. The objective of the RLSA is: To meet the Goal descrihed above. Collier County's ohjective is to create an incentive based land use overlay system, herein referred to as the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, based on the principles of rural land stewardlhip as d~fined in Chapter 163.3177(11), F.s. The Policies that will implement this Goal and Objective are set jiJrth helow in groups relating to each aspect of the Goal. Group I policies describe the structure and organization of the Collier County Rural Lands Slewardlhip Area Overlay. Group 2 policies relate to agriculture, Group 3 policies relate to natural resource protection, and Group 4 policies relate to conversion of land to other uses and economic diversification. Group 5 are regulatory policies that ensure that land that is not voluntarily included in the Overlay by its owners shall nonetheless meet Ihe minimum requirements of Ihe Final Order pertaining to natural resource protection. Of particular relevance to the EAR process is Policy 1.22 of the FLUE which reads: The RLSA Overlay was designed to be a long-term strategic plan with a planning horizon Year of 2025. Many of the tools, techniques and strategies of the Overlay are new, Innovative, incentive based, and have yet to be tested in actual implementation. A Comprehensive review of the Overlay shall he prepared jiJr and reviewed by Collier County and the Department afCommunity Affairs upon thefive-year anniversary of the adoption of the Stewardship District in the LDe. The purpose of the review shall be to assess the participation in and effectiveness of the Overlay 1 Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) implementation in meeting the Goal, Objective and Policies sel forth herein. The specific mea.vures of review shall be as fiJllows: 1. The amount and location of land designated as FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and other SSAs. 2. The amount and location of land designated as SRAs. 3. The number of Stewardship Credits generated, assigned or heldfor future use. 4. A comparison of the amount, location and type of Agriculture that existed at the time of a Study and time of review. 5. The amount, location and type 4 land converted to non-agricul1ural use with and without participation in the Steward,'hip Credit System since its adoption. 6. The extent and use of funding provided by Collier County and other sources Local, State, Federal and private revenues described in Policy 1.18. 7. The amount, location and type of restoration through parlicipation in the Stewardship Credit System since its adoption. 8. The potential for use of Credits in urban areas. The 5-year review was compiled by County Staff and evaluated by the 5-Year Review Committee. A Committee comprised of a diverse stake holder membership. The Technical review or Phase I was conducted according to the below described schedule, with acceptance of the report on May 27, 2008 by the Collier Board of County Commissioners and transmittal of the Phase I Technical Review to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on May 30, 2008. The Phase I report concluded that significant progress has been made in achieving the RLSA goal and since the conclusion of the Phase I report a number of approved SSA's have been processed within the system for a total of 16 SSA's comprising approximately 55. 956 acres. There has been no additional SRA acreage added to the system since the time of the technical review, leaving a total of 5,027 acres designated SRA with 1,027 of that total dedicated to public use benefit. The Phase I Report, which has been included electronically on CD as part of the 2011 EAR, stands as the first prong within the County's RLSA overlay EAR assessment. The two maps on the follo,"'ing pages illustrate the locution oftlle SSA's within the RLSA Overlay, as well as the underlying characteristics [Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSA), Habitat Stewardship Areas (HAS), Water Retention Areas (WRA) and Area ofCritieal State Concern (ACSC)] of the area the SSA's cover. 2 Rllr~11 ;;;anri<: ,tp\AI;Jrrkhin Art:>;;;a /RI c;l\\ RLSA STATUS MAP MARCH 2010 j -,~ RLSA STATUS MAP MARCH 2010 -------- "u~h $lewardshll' Ar"a. EiJ' - r-~~~~ ' .rn'""",'-"'" ."-'''''-''0'''' ___fO__ ,',"'''''".' 4 At the conclusion of the Phase I Report, the County initiated the Phase II process, which was an assessment of the individual five group policies of the RLSA which concluded with the generation ofthe Phase-Two Report. Within the development of the Phase Two report the Committee developed strategies to create incentives to encourage rural landowners to voluntarily agree to: . eliminate their right to convert ab>ricultural land to non agricultural uses in exchange for compensation; . retain agriculture within Open Lands as an alternative to conversion of such lands using Baseline Standards (and thereby reduce the size of the "development footprint" and the threat of urban sprawl in the RLSA Overlay); . create, restore and enhance panther corridor connections; . restore flow ways and habitat through a credit generating system that considers cost, difficulty and benefit value of each restoration type through a newly adopted tiered system; . impose a cap of 45,000 SRA acres in the RLSA Overlay and recalibrate the credit system to ensure the balance essential to the sustainability of a voluntary incentive based program which generates significant public benefits without incurring public expenditures; and . cooperate with Collier County in its creation of a plan for a county transportation network that meets the adopted Level of Service through build out of the county and considers the location of public services needed to accommodate the build out population. The RLSA Committee also engaged the public and various interest groups in a rigorous assessment of each and every RLSA Overlay policy to ensure internal consistency, thoughtful precision and careful scrutiny of the data, analysis and justification for each of the proposed Policy amendments. The work product of the RLSA Committee for its Phase II Report therefore actually consists of proposed GMP Policy amendments. The RLSA Committee's Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Program incorporates two volumes. Volume I incorporates both the earlier Phase I Report and the Phase II Report. Volume I of the Report is organized and respectfully submitted in the following sections: . Phase I Report contains the County's qualitative evaluation of the Overlay and ways to more effectively implement the RLSA Goal and Objectives. Phase 2 Report, Section I contains the RLSA Committee's recommended substantive policy amendments. Phase 2 Report, Section 2 contains all of the RLSA Committee's recommended policy aIll~Il{.lrn~nls, whether substantive or insubstantial. . Phase 2 Report, Section 3 contains the supporting documentation for the amendments. Phase 2 Report, Section 4 provides an account of public participation and comments. committee deliberations, and committee action. Phase 2 Report, Section 5 contains the RLSA Committee's recommended new Policy 3.7 of the Transportation Element of the GMP based on a proposal for a county transportation network initiated by Collier County Transportation Planning. 5 D"...".II .".........e- C...a.."..r4"'hi.... Arc."," 101 C^\ In summary, based upon the adopted RLSA Overlay and the RLSA Committee's recommended policies as contained in Volume I of the Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Program, the RLSA will: I. Achieve a balance of natural resource protection, agriculture and sustainable community development at the planning horizon year and at build-out. 2. Provide new and meaningful economic incentives for agriculture to remain as a viable component of the economy of Collier County. 3. Increase the total arca of lands expected to be placed into Stewardship Sending Areas from 92,000 acres to 134,300 acres. 4. Enable proteetion and restoration of critieal natural resources on private land using ineentives that do not require public dollars for acquisition or management. 5. Align the RLSA program with the Florida Panther Protection Program's objectives. 6. Establish a maximum SRA development footprint of 45.000 acres-less than 1/4 of the total RLSA; or 15% when open space within new communities is accounted for. 7. Reduce the potential for conversion of open lands to non-RLSA baseline development, thereby reducing urban sprawl. 8. Accommodate forecasted population growth in a sustainable manncr and ensure that supporting public facilities, services, and infrastructure are provided. 9. Create new opportunities to site economic development driven new businesses in proximity to places for employees to live. 10. Accommodate a long range interconnected transportation network plan that serves Eastern Collier County. Volume II of the Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Program includes all support information including major documents, presentations, minutes, ctc. considered by the Committee during the course of its twenty three [23] public meetings. Both Volumes ofthe Five Year Review of the Rural Lands Stewardship Prol!ram hav, been provided on CD attached to the EAR adoption workbook and stands as the basis for the Countv's comprehensive EAR evaluation ofthe RLSA Overlav, The following are the maior substantive proposed amendments to the RLSAO advanced for consideration by the Committee during its approximate 9-month review of the RLSAO extending from April through December, 2008. Although there are other recommended amendments to the RLSAO than those listed as follows, the remaining amendments are considered to be minor. corrective in nature. and intended to cause the RLSAO policies to be better harmonized with each other. Policy 1.6.1 (new Policy) The recommended ncw Policy 1.6.1 permits a fivc ycar "Conditional Pcriod" for a Conditional Stewardship Eascment with a possible extension I(Jr onc additional year. Policy i.i (amendment) The recommended amendment to Policy 1.7 provides that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission would be a grantee (along with Collicr County) to future "perpetual rcstrictive easements" (Stewardship Easements) rather than the Florida Department of Ab'Ticulture and Consumer Scrvices which has been the grantee in past BCC- approved RLSA Stewardship Easements. Policy 1.22 (amendment) Currently, Policy 1.22 language provides for RLSAO review, "upon the five year anniversary of the adoption of th, Stewardship District in the L.and Development Code (LDC)". The amendment proposes to have the review completed as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report process as rcquircd by Chapter 163 of the Florida State Statutes. 6 RlIr~11 ;mete;; Stpwrlrrl<;hin Arpt=l lRLSA) Group 2 (amendment) The recommended amendment to the Group 2 language eliminates the language related to protection of agricultural lands from premature conversion to other uses, and replaces this language with new language related to the retention of land for agricultural production. Policy 2.1 (amendment) The recommended amendments to Policy 2.1 eliminate the language related to protection of agricultural lands from premature conversion to other uses. Also included is the elimination of the language comparing acreage needed to accommodate the projected population of the RLSA in the Horizon year of 2025 with the acreage required to accommodate such projected population ifthe RLSAO wcre not utilized. Policy 2.2 (amendment) The recommended amendments to Policy 2.2 provide for additional Stewardship Credits to retain agriculture lands within the RLSA. Policy 3.11 (amendment) The recommended amendments to Policy 3.11: . eliminate the restoration priority language related to restoration work within the Camp Keis Strand Flowway Stcwardship Area (FSA) or contiguous Habitat Stewardship Areas (I ISAs); provide language allowing for two additional Stewardship Credits (rather than the 4 Credits now permitted) for restof(!tion activities within a FSA or HSA, regardless of location in the RLSA; elimination of thc additional two Stewardship Credits for each acre of land dedicated for restoration activities within other FSAs and HSAs; and provide additional Credits for either caracara restoration at 2 Credits per acre, or for exotic control/burning at 4 Credits per acres, or for flow way restoration at 4 Credits pcr acre, or for native habitat restoration at 6 Credits per acre. Within the area proposed for restoration, Land Use Layers 1-6 must be removed. The specific process for assignment of additional restoration Credits shall be included in the Stewardship District ofthe LDC; . provide for Stewardship Credits to incentivize the creation, restoration, and enhancement of a northern panther corridor connection and a southern panther corridor connection by providing for 2 additional Stewardship Credits for cach acre of land so dedicated and, should the owner also effectively complete the corridor restoration, an additional 8 Credits per acre would be awarded; . provide for Stewardship Credit incentives for restoration of shailow wetiand wading bini furaging habitat located in FSA, HSA, or Water Retention Area (WRA) at the rate of 2 additional Credits per acre and, upon successful completion of the restoration, an additional 6 Crcdits per acre shall be awarded; and . limit Credit incentives to only one type of rcstoration for each acre so designated for restoration Policy 3.13 (amendment) The recommended amendment to Policy 3.13 requires the acreage of a WRA, if such acreage provides for water treatment and retention exclusively for a Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA), to be included in the SRA acreage and would require the use of Stewardship Credits to enable the use of such an area for this purpose in a SRA. 7 Dllr:::all :;:H,nc:: ,tQ\AI:::u",..I<::hin .6r,:1~ (RI <;ill Policy 4.2 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 4.2 corrects/updates acreage calculations within the RLSAO which are both outside of and inside the Area of Critical State Concern and limits the amount of lands that can be designated as SRAs to 45,000 acres. The separate Comprehensive Planning Department Staff SRA build-out projection and Wilson Miller build-out projection of the maximum SRA acreage allowable under the existing RLSAO [if 100% of property owners participate using the existing Credit system 1 is 41,040 SRA acres and 43,312 SRA acres, respectively. This SRA acreage does not include any development which may occur under the underlying zoning of Rural Agricultural- A District and which would not be participating in the RLSAO, Policy 4.5 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 4.5 provides for the SRA :Mastcr Plan to be consistent with the County's Long Range Transportation Plan, the County Build Out Vision Plan referenced in recommended new Policy 3.7 of the Transportation Element of the GMP, and Acccss Management procedures. The recommended amend to Policy 4.5 also includes a requirement for the provision of a Management Plan as part of the SRA Master Plan which includes provisions for minimizing human and wildlife interactions between the SRA and surrounding undeveloped properties. Policy 4.6 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 4.6 requires an SRA to include a mobility plan that includes consideration of vehicular, bicycle/pedestrian, public transit, internal circulators, and other modes of travel/movement within and between SRAs and areas of outside development and land uses. Policy 4.7 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 4.7 climinates Hamlets as a specific fonTIS of SRA and reduces the number of specific forms of SRAs from f{1Ur to three in conjunction with thc recommended deletion of Policy 4.7.3 language related to Hamlets. Policy 4.7.1 (amendment....Towns) This recommended amendment to Policy 4.7.1 increases the minimum size of a Town from 1,000 acres to 1,500 acres, increases the maximum size from 4.000 acres to 5.000 acres. and provides for the requirement of an internal mobility plan. Policy 4.7.3 (deletion...Hamlets) Policy 4.7.3 is recommended for deletion. Policy 4.7.4 [now renumbered Policy 4.7.3 (amendment...Compact Rural Development)) The recommended amendment to Policy 4.7.4 keeps the maximum size of a Compact Rural Development (CRO) at 100 acres while providing language supporting thc location of research. education, tourism, recrcation, and housing within eROs. Policy 4.7.4 (new) This new Policy 4.7.4 stresses that Towns and Villages are the preferred locations for business and industry in the RLSA to further promote economic dcvclopment, diversification. and job creation with a list of examples of permitted 8 RIII":a1 I :anrfc:. ,h:::a\AI::lrn'=.hin Arp::l (RI <;A \ uses such as environmental research, agricultural research, aviation and aerospace, health and life sciences, corporate headquarters, computer hardware, software and services, etc. Policy 4.14 (amendment) The recommended amendments to Policy 4.14 provide: . language requiring a proposed new SRA, at the time of SRA approval, to provide for the opportunity to provide direct vehicular and pedestrian connections to an adjoining SRA or adjoining lands designated as Open; . new language requiring that public or private roads and connecting signalized intersections within or adjacent to an SRA be maintained by the primary town or community it serves; and . new language providing for a variety of mitigation credits and offsets. Policy 4.19 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 4.19 provides for: . 8 Credits required for each acre of land included m a SRA where such Credits were created from a Stewardship Credit Sending Area deemed vested under the 8 Credit ratio; and . 10 Credits required for each acre of land included in a SRA where such Credits were created from any other Stewardship Sending Area Policy 4.22 (new) This new Policy 4.22 provides that assessment of historic or cultural resources be done when such are identified in the RLSA through the SRA designation process, including the assessment of such resource's historic or cultural significance and the exploration of educational and public awareness opportunities regarding such significant resources. Policy 5.4 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 5.4 provides language to establish a map of potential wildlife crossing within 12 months of the effective date of the GMP amendments to be used in evaluating community, cultural and historical, and transportation planning for the RLSA, including all SRAs described in Group 4 Policies. Policy 5.5 (amendment) This recommended amendment to Policy 5.5: . deletes certain outdated references relative to the preparation of management plans; . provides requirement for preparation of a management plan for the purpose of minimizing human and wildlife interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural lands uses; and . provides for a monitoring program for developments greater than 10 acres. 9 Rllr::!lll ::anrlc;, <:;'tp\AI;:arrlc:.hin Arp.;:a fRJ <:;'A\ Policy 5.7 (new) This new Policy 5.7 requires that any development on lands not participating in the RLS program be compatible with surrounding land uses and that outdoor lighting shall be reasonably managed to protect the nighttime environment, conserve energy, and enhance safety and security. Policy 5.8 (new) This new Policy 5.8 provides that assessment of historic or cultural resources be done when such are identified in the RLSA, including the assessment of such resource's historic or cultural significance and the exploration of educational and public awareness opportunities regarding such significant resources. The above proposed amendments have not been scheduled by the County for an official amendment cycle of the GMP as of the date of authoring the EAR. Sinee the acccptance of the Phase II report on April 22, 2009, there has been another effort lead by U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the development of a ""Habitat Conservation Plan (Her)" for the RLSA Overlay area. It is anticipated that the outcome of the HCP and the specifics contained within the HCP will have a influence upon the composition and specifics of the RLSA and how development will move forward within the regulatory environment. Based upon that recognition. the County intends to wait to the conclusion of the HCP process before scheduling any amendments to the RLSA Overlay. Below are the Public Comments received related to the RLSA Overlay. . County should be studying impacts (if RLSA potential development and their effect on Estates (ie. ground water, drainage, long-term effects). Policy 3.1 of Future Land Use Element - Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay . LRTP not showing specifics of RLSA. Informational . Increase developer credits during RLSA revisions. RLSA .i-Year review amendments - Observational. . Credits for underground us.\'ets? (Mining) RL\A 5- Year review amendments - Ob~'ervati(}nai, . Panther overpasses and underpasses (do they workP Programmatic. . Define primary and secondary panther habitat. Programmatic. . No new high speed (> 36 mph) roads built in RLSA and Rural Fringe Sending Areas (low speed essential for wildlife preservation) Ob,.ervalional . Proposed RLSA amendments in Collier County did not address any concerns from DCA (7 written concerns from Tom Pelhaml. Observational. . RLS'A and RFMUD need 10 be compatible with Golden Gale Master Plan. Observational. . RLSA has encouraged premature conversion of agriculture by: Only low quality agriculture has been prolected By usinK eminent domain to provide transportation corridors Refusing to address DCA. concerns Using Section 189 Districts to bypass Florida '.\' Growth Management Laws - Observational. 10 Rr'I"::l1 t ::anrlc ,tpIM::l,.-rkhin an::.::. fRl ,11\ Climate Change-. Energy Efficiency STATEMENT OF ISSI'1' Climate Change is focused on lh.~ determination of the best ways to integrate policies related to climate change and energy efticiency to promote strategies to reduce green house ga~ emissions for the Count) . ISSUE BACKGROliND Land use and transportation comprise the majority of contributions to greenhouse gas emissions in Collier County. Carbon emissions from the burning of fossil fuels to power the built environment represent a potential long-tenn hazard to the world. but also, and in particular peninsular Florida. Greater efficiency of power use. reduction in emissions and transition to renewable fonns of energy will have the greatest impact in reducing the County' s carbon f()otprint when tied to land use planning over all other sectors. The idea of a carbon footprint is a relatively new concept and can have a different meaning. depending on what is being measured. The general concept however, is a measure of thc greenhouse ga~ (GHG) cmi"il1ns directly. and sometimes indirectly. caw.ed by a gin'n individual. business. communitv. etc. The idea is that once a carbon footprint can be dctermined. efforts can be taken to reduce the lootprint through mitigation, also called carbon offsets. Thc tcnn is a subsct of a hroader concept known as the l'eological footprint. which is a more comprehensive measure of an individual. business. or community's impact Oil thc Earth's ('Cosvstcms. comparing I'uman demand with the Earth's ability to "cgenerate and accomowdaK such demand. \s noted in th" Introduction sectioll, in 2007, the County went through a process to inventory the GIlG emiSSIOns in County Government and also f<)r the County as a whole. Further detail on this inventory is included in tbe final report prepared byl\\entyFiily. L LC. titled. "Energy Audit and Greenhouse Gas fment()r~ ". Thc helO\\ tank represems the perc:entage hreakdown of total C02 emissions for the ('(,u;11) 1,,;\ SL'\:,tO'f in 2007. Collier Emis$tons per Sedor 2007 W$ * wllesldentlal W Commerdal i!lT~Mivn wW_ l,'j. ,\ c:.' 1)\..-.tl1 f),'iJl -,idllu ih.... ,,\> lLl \. ','[;i'l' \lLiJi/:..d I.J,l"~' l ) ; ,~ l ",l [':(,i,,-" > ,:I'I;! ::.-r [ii, ,-'"uidi,c l:'(I)"";t..'[ t'_.'Jdl',l L\ i",dl.ICC (:()::-b ,ino t.:';j\)i(l'llTi ,/ ,,'mute ,:,i';'onqe 1 ll1iJl:kL Additionally, the inventory provides a baseline against which future energy use and emissions reductions can be measured. The project was funded by Collier County Audubon Society, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida and National Audubon's TogetherGreen grant program and utilized the software and protocol provided by ICLEI, the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. The three primary motivations for the Energy Audit Report were: 1) Understanding patterns of energy use can lead to saving residents/taxpayers money. 2) It is widely accepted that fossil fuel energy use contributes to global climate change, the extent of which will be critical for low lying regions like Collier County. Assessing and reducing emissions demonstrates responsibility to present and future residents. 3) Increasing numbers of state and federal programs (and grant opportunities) require municipalities to address climate change. By following the established ICLEI protocol, Collier County joins twenty four communities in Florida and hundreds nationwide willing to take action and thus demonstrate responsibility and accountability. The report provided specific recommendation recommendations and next steps for County as follows: 1) Establish the following reduction targets: 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050. 2) Collate a summary of the baseline inventory, all energy savings related projects, together with additional programs (including but not limited to those described below) into a comprehensive Collier County Climate Action Plan. Identify within the plan how GHG reduction measures tie into other County and regional efforts (such as the Master Mobility Plan, Coastal Management Plans and Land Development Codes). Include an assessment of the impacts of climate change and energy management in existing plans and codes to ensure the County anticipates and budgets properly for all potential changes in Collier County through at least the next forty years. 3) Pursue the LFGTE project along with other waste management projects. 4) Continue government based work: i) building energy retrofits, ii) street lighting replacements to high efficiency bulbs, iii) alternative fuel vehicles, and iv) promote the commuter services program. 5) Continue the community focused transportation programs such as traffic signal optimization. 6) Establish new community oriented programs to include: i) a community focused "Be Green when Green makes Cents" program, or equivalent and ii) a Green Business Program. (Additional programs could be described within in the planned Master Mobility Plan and potentially be funded through additional grant monies or other sources). 7) Carry out an energy use/greenhouse gas emissions re-inventory in 3-5 years to measure progress. The Energy Audit was presented to and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners in November of 2009. While the Board did not provide wholesale acceptance of all of the recommendations contained in the report, the Board did, based upon the acceptance of the Report, create the Rebuilding Collier's Energy Use Task Force. The purpose of the Task Force is to explore the recommendations contained within the Report and bring suggestions back to the Board on the means to accomplishing the energy efficiencies contained in the Report. Climate Change - 2 The work of the Task Force is on-going at the time of authoring this report. In June of 2010, the Task Force began discussions with the Board regarding the development of a program to green up energy use at homes and businesses throughout the County. The program the Task Force envisions would take advantage of legislation called Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE), signed by Gov. Crist in May, 2010. PACE sets out a financing mechanism for local governments to create a pool of money homeowners and businesses can tap for projects from electric car chargers to energy efficient windows. Other possible uses for the money include insulation upgrades, solar panels, wind turbines and energy efficient air conditioning. The full specifics and applicability of the program were still in the development stage by the Task Force at the time of authoring this report, but the PACE program and other similar efforts to increase energy efficiency within the County are expected based on the Task Force's work within the Energy Audit. The future recommendations of the Task Force, once approved by the Board are expected to intertwine with the regulatory environment of the County. Land use decisions programmed to save energy and protect the Earth's climate have concurrent and reinforcing benefits of enhancing local quality of life and the community's unique sense of place. By enhancing the County's land use policies and regulations to discourage urban sprawl and better recognize the relationship between land use decisions and energy consequences, while preserving agricultural and natural resources, Collier County will proactively take steps to buffer against global warming's potential impact over the next century. It should be noted that between 2003 and 2009 the County's unincorporated population grew at an 11.9 percent rate, while the number of road miles grew at a 16.8 percent rate and the total developed land area grew at a ]9.9 percent rate. Stronger policies interlinking land use and energy efficiency by the GMP and Land Development Code (LDC) may have created a more uniform rate of growth among these three inter-related matrix. Primarily, compact development patterns are as important as promoting greater fuel efficiency in combating climate change. Locating homes in conveniently placed, walkable neighborhoods can significantly reduce the growth in the number of miles the County's citizens' drive, shrink the nation's carbon footprint, and give people more housing choices. Just as compact development can be a major contributor in reducing C02 emissions (residents generally drive a third fewer miles than those in automobile-oriented suburbs), sprawl development, which increases the number of vehicle miles of travel, is a major contributor in increasing C02 emissions. The implications of the disconnect between land use and transportation planning not only manifest in greater amounts of C02 emissions, but greater infrastructure cost to the County. Traditional Neighborhood Design based upon Smart Growth and New Urbanism principles with smaller lot sizes, compact urban form, a variety of multifamily housing types, and a mix of land uses results in infrastructure systems that serve more development in proportion to their cost to construct. In comparison, typical lower density Conventional Suburban Design alternatives require far-reaching infrastructure systems to serve lower-density development, with higher costs to build. Case studies have shown a clear reduction in infrastructure cost for scenarios with higher density. I The city of Tallahassee/Leon County Multimodal Transportation District Plan illustrates the cost of low density, provided on the following page. I. Smart Growth & Conventional Suburban Development: Which Costs More? An infrastructure case study completed for the EP A. Climate Change - 3 Land Needed to Accommodate Leon County's Projected Increase of 104,000 People by 2030 Based on Various Development Scenarios 1 acre lots = 72 square miles - Lane miles to serve: 795 ('ust for majnr ro:uls: SQ,352,t)(lO,OOO; ('ost per household: $208.0..W Future Land Use ,. 1/2 acre lots = 36 square miles - Lane miles to serve: 384 (osi for majur mads: If;-t()O!UIUO.OOO: Cosl !IN' hOUSl'holct: SI00.3(11 FLltL're Lar7c1 Use - 1/8 acre lots = 9 square miles - Lane miles to serve: 84 ((1st for Ilwior r-o:H!S: S1.00S,OOn,ou(I-. (0-:1 pef household: S2!.')5~ FutLlre Laru:~ Use ;"',c ~ c, -.....,,- Climate Change - 4 .. *" . -.. 1~- - -;/<c- The Collier GMP has policies allocated throughout the various elements that address energy efficiency in transportation planning, land use, residential development, and housing. Through the EAR process, the County will identifY opportunities to build on the existing policy framework and/or introduce new policies specifically design to address climate change. Population Projections and Energy Efficiency The most recent build-out projections for the County, as provided by the Collie Inter-Active Growth Model are presented in the below table. What is significant to the issue of Climate Change is the percentage of projected growth that is allocated to Immokalee, the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA). These three Districts of the GMP, with the anticipated adoption of the transmitted Immokalee Are Master Plan changes, have be designed based upon smart growth principles, which promote a range of housing opportunities, encourages the mixing of land uses, provide a variety of transportation choices and encourages the design of walkable neighborhoods. Sub-District Build-Out Population Current Estimated Population Projected Increase Percent of Projected Increase ~rnmokal~t, '::'0..'._:' -'--i.--i:.q ':::'. 5 :'~( RF\!l D :(i '::Ul~)l-; ~.. (n) i'll RL."\ :.:': -'I \~) i,: J~' _ H ,_ ;".n:,- f i;ud :' ".''' ...............,{; fl' Build-out East of CR 951 Build-out west of CR 95] CIGM 20]0 BuildOut Pro' ections 444.220 90,209 354,011 57.25% 507,686 243,391 264,295 42.75% 951.906 333.600 618.306 The principles and concepts upon which these Districts were created are those being required by the State through HB697 to be incorporated within a jurisdictions local comprehensive plan. The Collier County Growth Management Plan has a head start in incorporating the necessary modifications needed to the planning and regulatory environment to address the challenge of Climate Change, with nearly half of the COWlty'S future residents anticipated to live within a built environlnent shaped by planning principals geared to promote sustainability. It should be noted that the concepts of sustainability are spread throughout the GMP's various Elements and will evaluated during the EAR process to identify opportunities to further their effectiveness. House Bill 697 In 2008 the state legislature passed comprehensive energy legislation that includes several elements applicable to land use planning: . Requires that data and analysis for the Future Land Use Element now include information about energy- efficient land use patterns accounting for existing and future electric power generation and transmission systems; and greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Climate Change - 5 . Requires that the Traffic Circulation Element incorporate transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Requires that the Transportation Element for urbanized areas per FS.339. I 75 shall address the incorporation of transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Requires that the Housing Element include standards, plans, and principles relating to energy efficiency in the design and construction of new housing and use of renewable resources. Requires an addition to Future Land Use Map series relating to energy conservation. Requires construction of all local government buildings begun after July 1,2008 to meet one of the nationally recognized green building certification standards (such as the United States Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - LEED) Requires use of ethanol and biodiesel blended fuels in govemment vehicles where available as well as other requirements relating to govemment fleets and facilities. . . . . . The Department of Community Affairs is in the process Df establishing the rule development to implement the requirements of the new legislation. The most recent proposal has been included at the end of this major issue discussion. The GMP objectives and policies related to the issue must establish the rational nexus for the creation of tools which focus on creating development that will result in fewer vehicle miles and trips and more walking, biking, and transit trips. That means compact mixed-use communities with highly connected and pedestrian-oriented street networks where jobs, housing. entertainment. and retail are in close proximity and where transit and other fonns of non-vehicular transportation are a practical solution. In addition to reducing vehicle miles of travel and. therefore, GIIG emissions, such communities promote healthier citizens through cleaner air and the ability to walk to more placcs. cnablc oldcr Floridians to rem~in indenendent ~nd in their homes lonQer. reduce traffic conQestion and time sne11l in cars (and the ~ ......' ...... . ' number of cars needed by a family, which also saves money). and protect natural resources. Comprehensive Plan Implementation The Collier Growth Management Plan addresses the need J()r greater energy efficiency in multiple areas, including new developments. residential construction, and mobility options within transportation systems. Below are the existing and proposed policies (grouped by Element) contained within the various Elements of the GMP. which are designed to address the issue of energy efficiency and green house gas reduction strategies. The effectiveness of each and everyone of thc policies listed below is provided for within the individual element in which they are contained. To avoid wmecessary redundancy each one of those assessments will not be replicated within this section. It should be noted that a number of these Objectives and Policics are being suggested for modification to improve the overall effectiveness of the Objective or Policy. Future Land Use Element Policy 2.4 Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a) 3" Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element, development located within the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) (See Map TR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element. Climate Change - 6 Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation, pursuant to the certification process described in Transportation Element, Policy 5.5, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00 the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended) as part of their plan of development shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion Density Reduction requirement as contained in the Density Rating System of this Element. Developments within the Northwest and East-Central TCMAs that meet the requirements of FLUE Policies 6.1 through 6.5, and Transportation Policies 5.7 and 5.8, and that include affordable housing (as per Section 2.06.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended) as part of their plan of development shall not be subject to the Traffic Congestion Density Reduction requirement as contained in the Density Rating System of this Element. Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network. Policy 2.5 The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the Transportation Element. Standards within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and Policies 6.1 through 6.5 ofthis Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby designated: 1. Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (See Map TR-5). 2. East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pinc Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (See Map TR-6). Policy 2.6 Traffic impacts generated by new development are regulated through the implementation of a 'checkbook' transportation concurrency management system, which incorporates two Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) and a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA). New developments within the TCMAs and the TCEA that commit to certain identified traffic management strategies shall reduce (the TCMAs) the traffic impact mitigation measures that would otherwise be applied to such developments. Policy 4.7: The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage Climate Change - 7 redevelopment. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on March 14,2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US 41 East, Davis Boulevard and Airport-Pulling Road. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge Road, between U.S. 41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road; b. U.S. 41 North in Naples Park; and, c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. Policy 5.3: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to mIDlmlze the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any changes to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging tbe use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. Policy 5.5: Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operatcd public facilities and serviccs to existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, before servicing new areas. Policy 5.6: Permit the use of clustered residential development, Planned lJnit Development techniques, mixed-use development, rural villages, new towns, satellite communities, transfer of development rights, agricultural and conservation easements, and other innovative approaches, in order to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas. Continue to review and amend the zoning and subdivision regulations as necessary to allow and encourage such innovative land development techniques. Within the Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay to date. there has been a total of 16 Stewardship Sending Areas, comprising approximately 55. 956 acres of environmentally sensitive and agriculturally viable lands which have been set aside from development, with a total of 5.027 acres designated SRA with 1,027 acres of that total dedicated to public use benefit. Additionally, the SRA was designed upon smart growth principals and the spatial relationship between dwelling units and supporting land uses. Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Usc District there are a total of 20.6 17 acres designated sending that are eligible to sever their developmcnt right. It should be noted that this acreage does not include all designated sending lands due to those lands being in public ownership and not eligible for the TDR program. Of the 20.617 acres, 17.5 percent or 3.615 acres have had or are in the process of having their TDR's separated through voluntary participation in the program. Based upon the above estimates Climate Change - 8 there are potentially 15,819 TDR's, of which 12.7 percent or 2,019 TDR's have been generated through participation in the program. Of the 2,019 TDR's which have been generated to date, 300 TDR's or 14.8 percent of the TDR's generated have been redeemed. Objective 6 Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) are geographically compact areas designated in local government comprehensive plans where intensive development exists, or such development is planned. New development within a TCMA shall occur in a manner that will ensure an adequate level of mobility (as defined in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals and policies: discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources, protecting historic resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit, bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby established in the specific geographic areas described in Policy 2.5 of this Element. The County through the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) provides for the annual assessment of the County's 167.5 lane miles within a TCMA to ensure that these areas are providing alternatives to traditiona.l road capacity demand solutions. Provided at the conclusion of this major issue is the County's TCMA reports from 2006 to 2010 or Attachment "1". These reports indicate that the volume to capacity ratio for these lane miles has been maintained. While the County has not specifically identified the number of projects that have developed within the TCMAs over the evaluation period, each project was/is required per the GMP to utilize two of the Transportation Demand Management strategies articulated in policy 6.2 to satisfy the Concurrency Management system. This allows for development to move forward in an area in which services and infrastructure are readily available, but due to density and intensity of surrounding uses couldn't move forward on traditional solutions of additional land capacity, which is directly related to the County's mandate to discourage urban sprawl. Policy 6.1 Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl by promoting residential and commercial infill development and by promoting redevelopment of areas wherein current zoning was approved prior to the establishment of this Growth Management Plan (January 10, 1989). Infill development and redevelopment within the TCMAs shall be consistent with Objective 5, and relevant subsequent policies, of this Element. Policy 6.2 In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new commercial development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as may be applicable: a) Preferential parking for carpools and vanpools that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development. b) Parking charge that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. c) Cash subsidy that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. Climate Change - 9 d) Flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the development. e) Compressed workweek that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by thc development. t) Telecommuting that would reduce the vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. g) Transit subsidy that would reduce auto trips generated by the development and increase transit ridership. h) Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. i) Ineluding residential units as a portion of a commercial project that would reduce vehicle miles of travel. j) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). Polil""v h lo- A ......-oJ .....-,. In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as may be applicablc: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to abutting commercial properties. d) Including affordable housing (minimum of 25% of the units) within the development. e) Vehicular access to abutting commercial properties. Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owuers to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collcctor and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Policy 7.3 AI! new and existing developments shall be enconraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other dcvelopments regardless of land use type. Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Policy 7.5: Climate Change - 10 The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. Policy 7.6 The County shall explore the creation of an urban "greenway" network along existing major canal banks and powerline easements. Policy 7.7 The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will continue to research smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land development regulations. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlav Goal Collier County seeks to address the long-term needs of residents and property owners within the Immokalee Area Study boundary of the Collier County Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment. Collier County's goal is to protect agricultural activities, to prevent the premature conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, to direct incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat, to enable the conversion of rural land to other uses in appropriate locations, to discourage urban sprawl, and to encourage development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques. The evaluation of the effectiveness is provided for within the RLSA major issue of this EAR report and the attached Phase One and Phase Two report generated during the County 5-year review of the RLSA Overlay. Policy 1.2 The Overlay protects natural resources and retains viable agriculture by promoting compact rural mixed-use development as an alternative to low-density single use development, and provides a system of compensation to private property owners for the elimination of certain land uses in order to protect natural resources and viable agriculture in exchange for transferable credits that can be used to entitle such compact development. The strategies herein are based in part on the principles of Florida's Rural Lands Stewardship Act, Chapter 163.3177(1]) F.S. The Overlay includes innovative and incentive based tools, techniques and strategies that are not dependent on a regulatory approach, but will complement existing local, regional, state and federal regulatory programs. Group 2 - Policies to protect agricultural lands from premature conversion to other uses and continue the viability of agricultural production through the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. Group 4 - Policies to enable conversion of rural lands to other uses in appropriate locations, while discouraging urban sprawl, and encouraging development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques by the establishment of Stewardship Receiving Areas. Transportation Element Climate Change - 11 Objective 4 - The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Policy 4.] - The County shall incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into this Transportation Element by reference and shall periodically update the Pathways Plan as needed. Policy 4.2 - The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by constructing the improvements identified on the 2030 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. Policy 4.3 - The County's pathways construction program should be consistent with the Comprebensive Pathways Plan to the maximum extent feasible. Policy 4.4 - The County shall annually adopt a Five (5) Year Pathways Work Program, which establishes pathway priorities, including projects to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Policy 4.5 - The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation ofthe 5 Year Pathways Work Program. Policy 4.6 - The County shall provide for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Policy 4.7 - The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safcty or operational problem. Policy 4.8 - The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction standards, as developed by the Florida Department of Transportation. Policv 4.9 - The Countv shall work to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse Gas Emission bv providinl!. for the safe movement of non-motorized vehicles throul!.h implementation of its Land Development Code and hil!.hwav desil!.n standards ordinances and shall incorporate bike lanes, sidewalk~ and pathwavs, as deemed appropriate, in new construction and reconstruction of roadwavs. - Proposed Objective 5 - The County shall coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future Land Use Map. The 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan scheduled to be adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), the basis for how improvements move from the planning spectrum to the construction phase to additions to the transportation system was based upon land use modeling as provided for by the Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM). The CIGM was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners in January of 2009 as an additional planning tool to be utilized by the County. The C1GM projects population in a spatially distributed manner that is based upon the regulatory allowances contained within the GMP and the individual sub districts contained within. Climate Change - 12 This fact further strengthens the tie between the County's long range transportation and land use planning, which in turn is anticipated to reduce inefficient public expenditures regarding needed improvements. Policy 5.4 - Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the set procedures. Policy 5.5 - Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification from the Transportation Planning Department that at least four Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized. Policy 5.6 - The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 ofthis Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: Northwest TCMA - This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (Map TR-5). East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR-6). Policv 7.4 - The County shall develop corridor management plans that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the recommendations of the Community Character Plan, County-sponsored Smart Growth initiatives, and the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County Commissioners may periodically appropriate funding for these plans. Objective 9 - The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions, the NTMP shall consider the impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems (from a level-of-service and operational standpoint). Policy 9.3 - The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The Collier County Transportation Division shall develop guidelines, which identify the conditions that would require the interconnection of two neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. Climate Change - 13 Policy 9.5 - The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut-through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 10.2 - The County shall continue to improve transit services for the transportation disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC). Objective 12 - The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. As part of the 2011 EAR, Collier County has committed to explore the feasibility of developing a separate, stand alone Public Transit Element within the Growth Management Plan (GMP), to provide for transit and transit oriented design appropriate standards and guidelines. Below is a chart documenting the ridership of the Collier A.rea Transit (CAT) system. Fixed Route Ridership 475,820 97,571 . 324,037 I', I,' .. ~. FYOl FY02 FY03 Ridership 1,180,1471,166,358 1,109,710 1,052,536 951,601 . ;' ~ it 627 ,824 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Policy 12.1 - The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantagcd Program shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transportation disadvantaged. The Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall be implemented through the County's regular bus system. FY04 FYOS Policy 12.2 - The County Transportation Division and the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans with the Florida Department of Transportation. Climate Change - 14 Policy 12.4 - The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between Bonita Springs, in Lee County, and Naples, in Collier County, exists, consider any intergovernmental efforts, which are necessary to bring about such service. Policy 12.9 - The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital Improvement Element. Policy 12.10 - The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transit Development Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Conservation & Coastal Management Element Policy 2.4.2: The County shall request the Department of Environmental Protection staff to participate in the development of future coastal and watershed management plans. OBJECTIVE 3.1: Ground water quality shall meet all applicable Federal and State water quality standards. Ground water quality shall be monitored in order to determine whether development activities are contributing to the degradation of Collier County's ground water quality. Ground water data and land use activities will be assessed annually to determine long-term trends and whether the County is meeting Federal and State regulatory standards for ground water quality. The County shall require ground water monitoring of land uses in accordance with Chapters 62-520, 62-550 and 62-777 of the Florida Administrative Code. Upon the detection of any ground water degradation determined through the monitoring process, the County will notify the appropriate regulatory agencies. In a coordinated effort with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), or of its own accord, the County shall institute a groundwater monitoring network by 2008, including the comprehensive inventory of monitoring wells, an assessment of monitoring wells previously damaged, and policies to make appropriate well repairs and replacements. Policy 3.1.1: Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as follows: 1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones defined as follows: a) W-l is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield). b) W-2 is the land area between the W-l boundary line and the ten percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). c) W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). d) W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). Climate Change - 15 2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows: a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones. b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W-l, W-2, W-3. c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and hazardous wastes: prohibited in W-I, W-2, W-3. d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary containment in W-l, W-2, W-3. e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W-l. 1) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found in 40 CFR part 135. g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use. h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited in W-l and W-2, conditional use required in W-3 and W-4. i) Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-l subject to complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low- pressure lateral distribution. j) On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-l, W-2, and W-3 shall meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-to, F.A.C. as the rule existed on August 31,1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring plan. 3. Conditional uses shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and where impacts of the development will be isolated from the Surficial and Intermediate Aquifer. OBJECTIVE 3.2: The County shall implement a well construction compliance program under criteria specified in the Collier County Well Construction Ordinance, which is designed to ensure proper construction of wells and promote aquifer protection. Policy 3.4.1: Continue the existing water quality monitoring program to provide base-line data, evaluate long- term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effcctiveness of the County's ground water protection program. OBJECTIVE 8.!: All activitics in the County shall comply with all applicable federal and State air quality standards. Policy 8. I.I : The County will rely on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Division of Forestry or the local fire departments as appropriate under their ,jurisdiction to permit and visually inspect the permitted air pollutant sources in the County. Policy 8.1.2: Climate Change - 16 The County will receive complaints concerning air pollution problems and refer such complaints to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Division of Forestry, or the local fire departments as appropriate. Policy 8.1.3: Collier County shall act to reduce air pollution from automobile emissions through continuation of the following procedures: 1. The Collier County Sheriff's Office will continue to enforce vehicle exhaust emissions standards. 2. As part of its development review process, Collier County will require the construction of sidewalks, bicycle lanes or bicycle paths in all new subdivisions. 3. The County will construct sidewalks, bicycle lanes or bicycle paths in conjunction with County-funded transportation improvements. Policy 8.1.4: Collier County shall continue to develop and maintain a comprehensive county-wide air quality monitoring program. Policy 10.4.7: Collier County shall prohibit construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line except where such construction would be permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985, where such prohibition would result in no reasonable economic utilization of the property in question, or for safety reasons. In such cases, construction will be as far landward as is practicable and effects on the beach and dune system and the natural functions of the coastal barrier system shall be minimized. Policy 10.4.9: Collier County shall prohibit seawall construction on properties fronting the Gulf of Mexico except in instances where erosion poses an imminent threat to existing buildings. Potable Water Sub- Element Policy 5.1: The County shall discourage urban sprawl by permitting universal availability of central potable water systems only: in the Designated Urban Area, in Receiving and certain Neutral Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in the Designated Urban-Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay, and in the Rural Settlement District, all of which are depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and in Towns, Villages, Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. These areas are further identified as: within the Collier County Water District Boundaries on Figure PW-l ofthe Potable Water Sub-element, except the outlying urban areas of Immokalee, Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the Islands; or within the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District Boundaries on Figure PW-2 of the Potable Water Sub-element; or in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized; within the Rnral Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, as each Town, Village, Hamlet, and Compact Rural Development is designated; and, in areas where the Connty has legal commitments to provide facilities and service outside the Urban Area as of the date of adoption ofthis Plan. Policy 5.2: Climate Change - 17 The County shall discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector and/or package potable water treatment systems through the development order approval process to ensure maximum utilization of the existing and planned public facilities. No existing private sector or potable water treatment systems shall be permitted to add customers unless all Levels of Service Standards are met, and operations are in conformance with all FDEP permits. Housing Element - Proposed Objective and Policies OBJECTIVE 9: Collier County shall support housing programs that encourage the development of energy efficient and environmentally sensitive housing. Policy 9.1: The County will encourage the construction of energy efficient housing by exploring innovative regulations that promote energy conserving and environmentally sensitive technologies and design. Policy 9.2: The County shall educate the public about the economic and environmental benefits of resource efficient design and construction. Policy 9.3: The County shall expedite plan review of bousing projects that promote energy conservation and design. Policy 9.4: The County shall continue to encourage the dcvclopmcnt of mixcd housing types near employment centers in order to reduce Grcen House Gas emissions and minimize carbon footprints. Policy 9.5: The County shall promote the incorporation of lJS EP A F:nergy Star Building and Appliances programs into construction and rehabilitation practices. Recreation & Open Space Element Policy 1.3.1: County-owned or managed parks and recreation facilities shall have automobile, bicycle and/or pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where such access is economically feasible. Policy 2.1.2: The County shall amend the Land Development Code to require the developer of a residential PUD, or a PUD having a residential component, to provide its residents and guests with a suitable neighborhood park, as determined on a case-by-case basis, which is, as required by Policy 5.4 in the Future Land Use Element, compatible with the surrounding development. Policy 3.1.6: The County shall cncourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes from the surrounding residential communities to park sites where general public access can be supported. Climate Change - 18 Conclusion The Collier County GMP is interspersed with Policy and Objectives that have a direct linkage to the issue of climate change, during this EAR review each of Elements were reviewed to identify areas where the Objectives and Policies could be made more effective in attaining their specified goal, which commutatively fonnulate the County's growing response to the issue of Climate Change. Public Comments Received . County should be studying ideas to target Green House Gas sources - besides transportation. Observational . County should be studying ideas to address lack of energy efficiency plans. Observational . County should be studying ideas to address need to plan filr Sea Level Rise. Observational . County should be studying ideas to access & connect State i'arks with County Network. Observalional . Promote and encourage safe bike/walk, including education to improve safety of bike/pedestrians routes to reduce number of miles driven, especially school drop-off. Policy 4.2 Transportation Element. . Reduce gaps between CA T stops. Explore feasibility of bike rentals at CAT stops to minimize gaps in the existing networks of bike/pedestrians pathways. Programmatic . Increase mass transit availability (CA T). Policy 12. IO Transportation Element . Create bike/pedestrians pathways on canal bankv to separale bike routes from vehicle traffic. Programmatic . Do no! use Vehicle .Miles Traveled (V1I4T) reduction as an excuse to build more commercial in neighborhoods where they were nol planned nor veiled Ihrough a local master plan process. Observational . Flooding as a result (~f climate change will affect current population estimates, County needs to revise estimates. Observational . Include more bridges (Golden Gate Estates) to reduce fuel consumption and safety. . Policy 9.3 Transportation Element/ GGAMP Resludy . Create County-wide storm water management to address sea level rise. Policy 2.1.5 Conservation and Coastal Managemenl Element . Standards to address Climate Change need 10 be different for Golden Gate Estates (than urban coastal zones). Observational . Allow low density areas in Golden Gate Estates. Observational . Make CA T cost more afjiJrdable. Observational . Increase Mass Transit instead of road widening. i'olicy 3.3 Transportation Element . Increase bike lanes. i'olicy 4.5 Transportation Element . Need to address sea level rise due to climate change. Observational Climate Change - 19 ~ ~ ~ E .s= u m ~ <>: cq 0 Cl "It CO "It (Y) l() CO 0 N .- CO 0 N N Ii) (() l,{) Co') 0 N ~ <0 00 I.(} u:i CO cD r---: <ri C"') I.() CD 00 ~ oJ N (") ~ CO 0) ~ ~ (() <D '<:t "It "It CD (() V '<t "<t N (() '<t N 'It "<t <q- (() CD "<t '<t <0 ~ ffi 8 ;1; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C; N ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ NON ..-- ..-- .- ..... ..-- .- 0 N .- N .- N ci ci N .- N N N N '<t co I'- 0 I.{) m N '<t 0 N l.{) 0) (() <0 lD en '<t co C0 N V co (() l() (V) co l() M I.{) r-- r-- .- ~ co l() OJ 0 l() "<t (") N m m 6 6 0 6 6 ci ci 0 0 6 .- CI ci 0 ci .- 6 ci CI .- ci 0 -0 -0 ro a: ii) B g I.~I~ ~ '" ..J 0 ..J -0 -0 -0 ro >. m (ij > ro TI > > ~TI~ -oTIrnQ) ..9:! ::J ro ":'<:::ro"- -0 m rn o"S ::J o > rn > > ~ 0 -0 0 caQ.lQ..o~~cCl:lo::aJ j ~ ~ il~I~I~ljl~ j ro .~ c _~ '::';: ,~ c ro 0:: ro wro(j)u..fco::JUJ UJ roO:2o OUUo,E ro C c C ro ~ rn ro if! if! if! -0 -0 ro rn > > ID ID -S-S ~I~ 00 uu -0 -0 "0"0 ro iU D ro in Co "Oii)-o3:; -oro-gj! ii;iD-o -0 rn -S ro ~ -0 ro ~ O::J :; 3 ro ~ &S~Q..gj&>"3~S SSaJ E~~jS~~~~~j~jjS~ ~ ~ ro ~ c rn ~ 0 b ro ro ro ~ <:{ >a:lr~Q)O:::OI~5a:l l1]ll)Q.l ~ rn ~:20 ~ ~ 0 rn rn rn G c roUe cc rn 0 ~ rn rn rn (/) (/) (/)(/) E ~ E ~ Cl ~ ~ ~ :;; ,., u ~ e ~ " U ~ o U ~ o '" ~ 1: o "- .. c: ~ ,:: 1: ?;- o c: "- " ~ 0 a:U <>: ~ :;;= U 0 I- U -0 :u > -0 -0 ID ro ro -S 00-0-00 n:: n:: ~ ~ rn ~ ~ c::: a::: ro "0 -0 0 0 ro &:&:.0-6.0 rn rn rn ~ ~ 0::: a::: a:J 0:: 0:: i!! c ro if! >- "'-0 " :u 0. > ID ~ iU 5 ~I~ .Q fu <3 0 >- ro -0" -0 ro ~ m > ro -g iV Q.l 0... 0 "3 g Q) 0::: 0 tD ro 0 a:J c <.9 ii L... ill c rn 9:! W llJ U::: (5 C5~ u (9 ~I~ I >- ro " '" :u o..(i! "* 0 CJ~ ~ a: ID -0 o (9 >- '" " . o.(i! ID c 1ii 0 (9 1h c g> ~ "> o~ (9 -0 -0 ro ro o 0 a: a: ID ID '" 0> -0 -0 tin:: ID Q) c c ~ 0:: TI TI ro ro > > ~~~~i~ ~ii~~~~i~ a:l co Q) III Q.l ..9J ..Q! ..Q1 ..Q1 c::: a::: Q.l "* 0::: ~~~SSS SSSS~5~g~ ~~~ l/) l/) l/) c c ID~~ ~~~~~~ mmc~~~ww~~~g.5.5.~~~ ~I~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ if! if! i r I I I 2 ~ i2 ;:: i , "I"' ~ ~ I , <0 '" "'I'" ro"' '" ~ ~ >- <U ro " " ~ ~ m m 0.. 0.. Q) Q) m ro '-' (9 1 ~ N ~I~ '<tMOl-.::tl.()ml.()(D ';!. M '<t I.() I.() -.::t ';!. .-- U)t--~ ,..,: ci 0 (Q I/) ci ~ ~ '" Ui U "C -= :> ; i~-g C) Ii .rg :; v en ..J .. Cl Cii .!! .5 '0 i 4) to- ~ ~ ~ .. ...J ~ :;; " c ~ ..J E " u ~ ~ Q. 0> 0 ~ ~ <0 <0 t- "' '" 0 0 ~ 0> N '" <0 "' 0 0 '" '" '" 0 '" '" 0 0 "' ... 0 0; 0; t- <Xi N '" 0; ui M N t- O; ~ M '" ~ N <Xi ~ 0; N M ~ M '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 N ... <0 N N N ... <0 <0 N <0 N N <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ... <0 <0 <0 ;;; t- N ;;; <0 ... ... t- N N 0> "' t- '" t- o N ;;; 0 t- <0 0> N '" 0 t- N <0 "' N ... ~ ~ N "' ... <e 0> "' 0> '" ... <e ... 0> '" 0> ... "' <0 0> 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ ~ M ~ N 0 0 0 N t- N N N ... N N '" '" ::;: '" ... ~ <0 0 ... t- ... '" t- O> 0 N "' t- "' t- t- O> '" t- <0 t- O> ... ... ... <0 "' t- "' '" ... <0 '" '" '" ... "' t- t- "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" is '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 0 '" Q) '" '" 0 '" 0 0 '" '" Q) '" '" -0 0 Q) '" -0 '" '" > -0 '" '" '" '" Qi '" '" '" 0 > 0 'm '" m E 0 'm '" 0 0 .~ '" .c l5 '" '" ~ .c '" .c ~ '" .c '" '" '" u '" ,:: c ,:: u 0 u '" ,:: c '" u '" i" 0 "' '" c "' Q) '" "' '" '" '" f- c Q) '" "' Q) Q) i" c "' c Q) ,t c Q) Q) '" ii5 Q) -l" E > E Q) "' 0 Q) E 0 Q) E 0> '" Q) 0> -8 '" 0 0> Q) 0> ,t t "- '" u. "- <l: '" -;;; '" :0 ~ -;;; '" '" ro '" '" '" ~ if, '" m '" W '" ro '" '" '" >. '" 0 "' '" "- iY .~ 0> "' oS .~ 0> iY .~ 0> '" iY E Q) .e- c $2 :0 c c :0 Q) c :0 '" Q) c 0 :0 '" 'C - :c 11 'm W ~ m Q) ;; "0, ~ W rn "5 W m c U ":::; E W m ro Q) << c Eo '" is ::; '" c ::; Eo ro '" ::; c f- is (f) 0> E '" <.') 0: 0> ~ '" '" '" 0: > 0 E '" 0: 0: s: 0 s: 0 0 c 0 c (; c c 0 '" <.') '" '" <.') ro <.') > > > > '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" is Q) '" '" 0 Q) '" '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 0 '" Q) Q) Q) '" '" Q) Q) '" Qi c 0 '" > c 0 > '" '" > > Qi '" '" '" '" 0 > '" '" 0 '" 0 'm '" 0 E i" ::; '" .c ~ 5 .~ '" ::; 'C .c '" .c 2S (5 '" i" .c '" 'm '" "' u 0 "' 0 '" u 0 '" u ,:: 0 '" u 0 ,:: c 0 -"" '" f- -"" '" '" ii5 '" '" "' ii5 "' Q) w '" w '" "' w w '" w w w '" Q) w '" "' c '" Q) E c '" :0 w w :0 E Q) E ,t 0 >. ~ "- ro '" ro (; t ~ "- ro '" t ro '" (; t ro ro '" c ~ 0 .c '" 0 0 w 0 .c W '" 0 .~ -9 '" '" m II "' '" "- E e- II "' '" e- '" E e- '" >. E :c c 0 ii - ~ c '" 0 :0 0 :0 J'! '" 0- 0 :0 '" '" w w '0, E "S '" ;;: w '0, c E W ;;: E W "S c '" ;;: E W 0 '" W 0> (f) W ~ '" :!!! E is c W 0> E '" <.') <.') f- w 0> > E '" E '" <.') f- E '" f- -' -' 0 '" s: c s: c c c 0 (; I:!!! '" '" '" > > > <.') i I '" '" '" >. '" '" .c .c .c .c .c '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" t t t t t 0 0 0 w w '" ~ 0 0 z '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" '" 0 '" '" z '" '" '" w '" '" 0 z z z z z .~ > '" '" '" ro 0 0 '" '" '" > 0 0 '" -C .c .c 8 w Q) 0 0 0 '" u u u is '" '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" "' 0 0 "- c c 0 .~ 'm .~ .~ 'm '" '" '" "' '" '" c c w w w Q) '" '" w w Q) w w c c c w Q) '" 0> ,:: ,:: '" ,t ,t w w W 0> f- f- f- '" '" '" :0 15 "- t t 1ii > > -9 -9 0 0> t '" ro ro 1ii '" '" iY E E E E E W W "' 0 0 <.') '" '" <l: <l: '" '" "' "' -;;; 0> iY iY 0 ii :0 :0 '" '" c e- e- '" '" oS oS 0 0 0> 0> 0> e- '" '" '" '" ro c c c c '" W W W c c '0, ;;: ;;: w Q) E E w w w ;;: c E E E E E w '" '" w is is ~ .;: ;: .;: c c 0: '" '" '" > > 0> '" ~ ~ E E ::; ::; ::; (f) 0: 0: '" '" '" '" '" c c c s: 0 0 0 ~ ~ f- f- f- f- f- '" '" '" 0 0 > > > <.') <.') <.') <0 '" 0> 0 N 0> N ... ;! "' t- <0 0 '" ... 0> 0 <0 '" N '" '" ... "' t- o 0 0 0 <0 <0 ;::: ;::: ~ ... "' "' "' ;;; ;! <0 0> 0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N '" ... ~ ~ "' "' <0 <0 <0 c w E w '" '" c ro ::0 >. " c w ~ ~ ::I o C o II c o '" ro 1:: o Q. "' c i" f- 1::~ o C Q. ::I W 0 ",0 < W ::!i :; o 0 f-O '" '" ~ <D <- ~ " '"' 0; <ri ~ ~ ~ <D <D " " <D <- <- '" 0 ~ ~ " ": " ~ ~ N ~ N '"' 0 ~ 0 '"' '" <D '" '"' 0 '" 0 0 ~ ~ 0 "0 "0 "0 OJ OJ 0 0 > '" a:: '" a:: iii ~ t ~ t c 0 0 OJ [; .g- 0> q <( <( - "0 -0 a:: a:: "0 -'< "0 -'< "0 a:: c a:: c a:: c OJ c OJ c 0 Li: 0 Li: 0 1ii " 1ii " 1ii 0> '" 0> '" 0> C '" C '" c .;: '0 ;; '0 .;; :::J 0 :::J 0 :::J 0 0 19 19 "0 "0 >- OJ OJ -'< "0 "0 0 0 ;: OJ OJ a:: a:: 0.. 0 0 ~ ~ '" a:: a:: u u '" '" OJ OJ rn '" '" '" '" (9 ro ro en en c -'< -'< .0 .0 '" 0 0 "0 E E ~ ~ (5 E E "0 "0 19 c c OJ OJ > > "' <- m '"' "' '" '" <D <D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N oo:t ~ M u:i M a'l t-..t N N '" ~ (J 1" .S! '> ~ ~ "! "0 c '" 11 ~ c en ~ v ..J ~ '" n; .S! .= ~ ~ ;; 0 >- ~ " ::;; C ~ .. ..J ~ ::;; " C ~ ..J C " u " ~ 0.. E Ql .... III .-.-.;: >- CJ) .) .... E l: .c Ql u E J'l :0: Ql Cl l1:l l: l1:l ::!: >- U l: Ql ... ... :::::s u l: 0::: 0 - u :J l: <( 0 ~ en l1:l .... 0 ... 0 0 c. N III l: t::: l1:l ... I- o >- c..... Cb l: 0::: g <( U ... :e: Ql () - 0 I- u III ~ :i Gl e l'lI ..J III Gl e l'lI ..J 'It ..c .... 01 e Gl ..J ... C 0 0:: .:.: l'lI Or 0:: "'u :1:_ .:.:> a.. 0 l- E 0 ... U. Gl E l'lI Z C 0:: ::::l <t '<t 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 co N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co co 0 L{) M (0 "<I: 0 ~ 0 ~ "<I: (0 '<t 0 0 (0 (0 0 co "<I: (0 (0 "<I: to M M ~ (0 co '<t '<t L{) M 0 L{) co (0 (0 (0 I'- (0 (0 co (0 I'- M ~ ~ '<t '<t N N (0 '<t N '<t '<t '<t '<t (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 '<t '<t '<t (0 (0 '<t '<t ~ L{) L{) L{) 0 0 0 '<t I'- co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I'- I'- I'- I'- (0 ~ ~ 0 0 N I'- (0 (0 "<I: 0 0 ~ Ol L{) I'- "<I: ~ Ol co ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ N N ~ ~ 0 N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Ol '<t '<t CX) Ol Ol 0 ~ L{) '<t (0 N Ol I'- M N (0 Ol 0 L{) Ol N co I'- I'- N N L{) co co Ol Ol 'r'" I'- "<I: '<t co co I'- (0 '<t co L{) M (0 Ol 0 0 'r'" 'r'" 0 0 0 0 0 'r'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'E -0 -0 ~ ~ co ro iU iU co I iU > > > OJ OJ OJ -0 OJ OJ :;: :;: OJ :;: 0 0 -'" -'" 0 -'" co co -0 co -0 -0 ~ -0 ~ -0 co ~ -0 -0 0 ~ ~ ~ co -0 ~ co -0 ~ -0 co -0 ~ ~ c::: co co co 0... ~ co 0... ro co ~ 0... ~ co co co co co co co co ~ > ~ > > > > 0 > ~ > > > > c co OJ co OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ c::: OJ ro OJ ~ ~ ~ ..Q -0 ..Q - OJ - -0 ..Q ~ - -0 OJ co ro OJ OJ OJ co OJ co ro OJ ro co OJ OJ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 (9 OJ 0 (9 c 0 ~ OJ (9 OJ 0 0 co ro 0 co 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 ~ co c::: co co co co co co c::: ~ co co co c::: co co co ~ ~ ~ c c c ~ c co .Q .~ ro .~ .~ OJ l/) c OJ .Q c co l/) OJ .Q l/) .~ c - - -0 .:; OJ -0 C ~ - .:; -0 -:; OJ OJ C -0 C L{) ~ -0 L{) C -0 OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro 0 (5 0 ~- <t! 0 <t! ":; 0 ro m 0 ell m n ~ U cI) 0:: U ,- 0 0 <3 en () () (9 , 0 (9 (9 c::: :.:J , ..J en (9 c::: (9 -0 -0 -0 -0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ro co co iil iU ro iil > > > > -0 OJ ~ OJ OJ ~ :;: :;: :;: ro OJ OJ OJ OJ > 0 0 0 -'" -'" 0 -'" OJ co co co -0 ~ -0 -0 ~ co -0 ~ -0 -0 -0 ~ co ro ro co -0 -0 ~ co ~ co OJ c::: ro co co co 0... 0 0 0... co co co co 0... co 0 0 ~ ~ ~ > c::: c::: 0 0 ~ > > c::: co c co co co OJ OJ OJ -0 c::: c::: co OJ OJ ~ ~ ..Q -0 ..Q ..Q - - co ..Q - -0 -0 co ~ ro ~ ~ OJ co ~ ~ co 0 c c ~ OJ co co OJ ~ 0 co ro 0 co ro 0 (9 (9 c::: 0 0 co 0 (9 0 0 0 z co c::: co co co -0 :'Q ~ ~ co co c::: co -0 :;: C c::: c::: c t c a:: ro .Q ro co c OJ OJ co c OJ .Q c OJ c - - - OJ -0 OJ OJ -0 ~ C C - OJ -0 ~ OJ -'" OJ C -0 L{) C C OJ L{) c c .:; L{) :~ c OJ (5 -0 C co 0 ro co I'- ro co ~ 0 I'- 0 ~ I'- ro ~ co 0 ..J () en c::: , en en (9 (9 , 0... 0... (9 ~ :.:J , ..J en (9 (9 c::: ..J 0... - -0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iU iU co co co > > > OJ OJ OJ :;: :;: OJ OJ OJ -'" -'" 0 0 0 ~ ~ -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 co co co -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 co ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -0 -0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0... 0... co ro co co co co co ro co co ro co -0 -0 -0 ro co co -0 > > > > > > > > > 0 0 c::: c::: c::: ~ ~ ~ c::: > OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ c::: c::: co co co OJ OJ OJ ~ OJ - - co ro OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ ..Q ..Q ..Q ~ OJ OJ OJ :J :J (9 (9 0 0 0 0 0 c c ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 ro ro co co co co co co co co co co ~ ~ -0 -0 -0 c::: c::: co co co -0 co C c ~ ~ ~ c::: c::: c::: a:: ~ l/) l/) l/) l/) OJ OJ c .~ .~ OJ c 0 .Q co co ro .~ .:; .:; .:; .:; -0 -0 OJ ~ c c OJ OJ OJ - - - OJ (5 (5 OJ 0 (5 (5 .:; .:; c c C -0 -0 C C C C 0 ro co co ro ~ co ro ro co co 0 0 0 0 (9 (9 (9 () () () 0 .- :.:J 0:: 0... c::: c::: en 0... () ..J ..J 0... en en 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . '<t In (0 (0 ~ N I'- N N M Ol '<t L{) I'- I'- co 0 ~ (0 I'- co In ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N M M M '<t L{) In (0 (0 (0 I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- N M ~ <( :e: () I- eu .... - r::: Cb () - CJ) eu W u... - c OJ E ..c (J co - - <( c::: :J <( OJ ..c - c c :;: 0 ~ ..c . l/) <0 l/) It) - ....: c ~ w 0> E Cl OJ l/) >- (J C OJ ~ "'C ~ :J ... (J l'lI "'C c 0 e (J l!! OJ CI) ..c CX) <0 - CI) E "<I: It) 0 0 It) t- ..J ~ '<t M 4- 'r'" 'r'" Ol_ e c 0:: OJ ~ Gl OJ Q) ;;: U :2: - -0 > III .!!1 0 Gl III :2: ~ ~ 'r'" co II Q) "D :2: v c e :J Q) III l'lI 0 e ~ ..J ..Q l'lI :2: .... <( ..J e Q) Gl ~ l'lI (.) () .... e ... 0 l'lI Gl l- I- ..J a.. . - c:: ell E ell Cl Cll c:: Cll :2: >- u c:: ell ... ... ::::s u c:: 0::: 0 _U ~ c:: <( 0 - O'lJS 0'" o 0 N g. c:: 't ~ 01- c.~ Q) c:: 0::: g <C~ ::2: ell U 0 I-u E ell - 1/1 >- en Ul ~ ~ Q) r: ClI ...J Ul Q) r: ClI ...J =It ..c: C: r: Q) ...J ... is 0 ~ ~ ll.. ClI . ~ ... U J: ~ - ll.. > ^ - l- E 0 ... u.. Q) E ca z Cl ~ ::l <( <C ::2: u I- - II) Q) 3: ..c: 't o Z 0 <D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co ~ 0 <D <D ~ ~ co U') U') 0 <D 0 <D N 0 0 N '<I: 0 0 0 co 0 <D 0 '<I: 0 co ~ co <D <D C'"l ~ ~ ~ ~ I"- <D C'"l co N C'"l N C'"l ~ U') m m m ?"- m C'"l ~ ~ (C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <D <D <D <D N <D N N <D <D <D <D <D <D <D ~ <D <D <D <D <D <D <D <D N ~ ~ <D 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U') U') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co ~ 0 ~ co ~ ?"- m l"- N 0 <D 0 ~ N U') U') ?"- m U') U') U') C'"l U') co 0 ~ 0 N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 C'"l N N 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U') <D co ~ ~ C'"l l"- I'- I'- 0 C'"l N 0 U') ~ ~ U') ~ m m C'"l C'"l I'- 0 N <D C'"l Il') <D <D U') U') U') <D I"- l{) C'"l ~ <D I'- m M C'"l ~ '<I: l{) co co l"- I'- m co l"- I'- I'- m 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J ro ro ro ro 0 0 ro 0 ro 0 ro 0:: ... 0:: 0 0:: 0 1:J 0:: 0 0 0:: 0:: ro 0:: ..c: E 1:J ..c: 1:J 1:J ..c: 1:J ..>< 0 1:J ..c: 1:J ..>< () ro 1:J () ro Q) ..>< 1:J ro () ro 0:: ro () ro 1:J ro 0 0 ro ro 0 .2: c ro 0 ro 0 c 0 ro Q) 0 c ro Q) C/) 0:: 0 Q) 0:: ... ro 0 0:: Q) 0:: ro - C/) 0:: Q) > 0:: ro 0 CI:l C/) 0:: CI:l 0 ... 1:J 0:: CI:l ... Q) 1:J C/) CI:l .;:: ... 1:J 0:: .Q u.. ro u.. Q) ro ro 0 u.. ro ~ g; , Q) .~ , ... Q) g; , == CI:l c == == Q) 0 c Q) == Q) U5 0 ll.. Q) == ..>< Q) 0 C .0 ~ 0 .0 1:J :.c; - 0:: .Q :.c; ~ - 0:: .0 ... ~ - 0:: 0 - ro - C/) ro - ... g; ~ ... ... Q) ... Q) I ~ ... ro Q) . Q) 0:: Q) 0:: Q) ~ t Q ..>< Q) 0:: ~ t c ..>< Q) 0... 0:: ~ t Is c u 1:J 1:J ~ 1:J g 0 1:J ~ 1:J Ie I:~ 0 "0 ~ 1:J 0 Q) c Q) c E Q) 0 L: E Q) <- U') c c 0 U') c c ~ 0 D. ?:I ro c .:; , m C m (I) 0 ... .;:; m C U) 0 m :J C U) 0 ... ~ 1'- E ..c: E :> 0 ::i ,- :> :> (9 :> (9 ~ 3: :> (9 (9 <i: 0... , 0... ::l <l: ....J , 0... ::l (/) 0... ::l ....J 1:J "0 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J ro ro ro ro 0 L 0 ro 0 ro 0 ro 0:: 0 0:: 0 0:: 0 1:J 0:: 0 0:: 0:: ro 0:: 1:J ..c: E 1:J ..c: ..>< 1:J ..c: ..>< Q) 0 1:J ..c: ..>< ro () 1:J ro () Q) Q) "0 ro () 0:: ro () Q) 0 ro 0 ro 0 ro > > c ro - 0 ro c c 0 ro Q) .2: c 0:: Q) C/) 0 0:: Q) .;:: ... ro 0 Q) 0:: Q) 1:J ro - ....J C/) 0:: Q) > ro "0 ... Q) ro ... Q) .;:: ... ... 1:J CI:l C/) 0:: CI:l 0 0 u.. 0:: CI:l u.. '.2: C/) CI:l 0 u.. 0 ro ... 0 Q) ro 0 ro Q) Q) , - Q) , ... Q) , Q) == CI:l 0 c Q) == Q) == Q) 1:J C (/) Q) == 0:: Q) - c 0... .!!! == ..>< Q) Q) 0 .- .0 0:: 0 .0 ... .0 - 0:: 0 .0 - (/) :J .0 ... ... - 0:: ro ~ ro 0 - - ro c - C/) ro 0 - ... ~ ... ... Q) en ro ... Q) ~ 0 ... ro Q) ..>< Q) t ..>< Q) ..c: Q) ~ t ..>< Q) 0 ~ c ..>< Q) 0... ..c: ~ t 0 0 "0 01 ... 0 ~ 1:J U ] 0 1:J "0 C g 1:J C/) 1:J ~ g ~ "0 ~ 1:J C/) ~ e E c ro c E c ~ c 0 c E c 0 -;:: Q) E c ~ ~ 0 :~ ro E ro ... ... E ro :J ro (/) 0 ... .2: E E ro ... (/) 0 ..c: Q) E ro :J :J (/) 0 > 0 ~ ....J > (9 > ::l (9 <l: ....J > U ::l (9 (/) ....J 3: > (9 (9 ::l (9 ~ in ~ I I 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J "0 I ro ro ro ro ro ro 0 0 0 0 3: 3: 0 0 ..c: ..c: ..c: ..c: ..c: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: ..>< ..>< 0:: 0:: t t t t t ... ... 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 1:J 0 0 0 0 0 ..c: ..c: ..c: ..c: ro ro ..>< ..>< Z z ro ro ro ro 1:J 1:J 1:J ro ro ro Z Z Z Z Z () () () () 0... 0... c c 0 0 0 0 ro ro ro Q) 0 0 0 ro ro ro ro ro ro Q) Q) 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0 0 0 > 0:: 0:: 0:: .- .- Q) Q) Q) Q) 1:J 1:J 1:J Q) Q) ... ... :J :J 0:: 0:: 0:: ro ro ro ro ro CI:l CI:l CI:l CI:l ro ro ro - - u.. u.. c c .;:: ~ ... ... ... ... ro ro , , Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 ~ ~ ~ l- I- l- I- 0 0 0 (9 (9 Q) OJ OJ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) c c c == == == == 0:: 0:: 0:: - - > > 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 - - <l: ro ro ro ro Q) ~ ~ ~ E E E E E c c Q) Q) <l: ~ ~ ~ - ... ... ... ... t t t Q) Q) ..>< ..>< ..>< ..>< ~ 0:: 0:: 0:: .!!l .!!l !!l .!!l ro OJ Q) Q) Q) 18 18 18 1:J 1:J ..c: ..c: 0 0 0 0 1:J 1:J 1:J ~ 1:J 1:J 0 0 - - E E E E c c c ro Q) Q) Q) E E E E E c c c ~ ~ :?: .;;; '> c c c ... ... ... 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ E E E E Q) ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro , ~ ~ ~ (9 (9 (9 (9 ~ ~ ....J ::i ::i (/) 0... 0... 0... l- I- l- I- I- > > > > ~ N 0 0 0 0 ~ N 'T'J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N ~ 0 ~ N 0 ~ N m 0 0 ~ 0 0 C'"l ~ m 0 ~ ~ N . ~ N C'"l C'"l ~ U') <D co m ~ N N ~~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ N N N N C'"l ~ ~ ~ U') U') U') <D <D <D <D m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! , , 'tI- C 0.- ~,.Q) J:: <(u ~ u- I-u 0 0 0 0 0 '<I: CX) 0 N l!) N N ~ (0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 t- '<I: 0 N N ~ ~ CX) l!) (") m '<t l!) '<I: '<t 0 0 0 0 '0 Cll '0 a E ~ IX Cll Q) > (/) <D - <D (/) :J ,~ :J Cll c a D.. <D > (J) eo (/) <l: c - c :~ .s:: ~ t: ~ - '<t Q) ~ (f) S ~ E ..::J ~ :;) ~ III t: III :a: '0 Cll ~ '0 a '0 IX IX <D Cll > t: a .s:: (/) 'C Q) IX '-' (/) 0 ... Cll Cll ... c <D D.. == :J a eo (/) .0 U l~ c ~ Cll <D t: ..", :~ '0 0 C C c '5 a ~ Cll :::i eo > t: 0 - III '0 - Cll ... a g a:: '0 Cll .s:: a Ul '-' <D <D IX t: Cll .::: > III <D ~ 'C (/) ... eo 0 0 (/) Cll - == == D.. ~ .- .- .0 .0 .0 (/) ~ ~ ~ t: <D <D <D c :J '0 '0 '0 :~ 0 c c c Cll Cll Cll ~ > > > ... Q) N 0 0 0 ~ '<t l!) t- O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g:;u ~ <( 0) o o ("II w E ::> 0 > "" w 0 u '" S "'! q, '" <f) '" w c '" , "" 1:> W c !':' "'0 U; ... c III 0 "'0 u c >. III .~ .... 0 (J) c. (J) .2- to to 0 C 0 ~ [g ai ~ ...I ~ ~ Cl ::> N N U C w :.::: oS <ll Gl c u :iE 0 - 1:> > III w ell <f) 0 '" III .0 .E! T'" :iE .<!! :iE II ell w V c :0 Gl III III J1J c ell ...I <f) III :iE .... ;S ...I c ell c III ell U .... C ... U 0 III ell :> ~ ...I D.. . .... t: Ql ..... 1Il >. - en c Q) ..... E t: J:: Ql <.> E 1B ::( Ql Cl n:l t: n:l 2 >. (.) t: Ql ... ... ::l (.) t: 0:: 0 - () :) t: <! 0 ..... co n:l ..... 0 ... 0 0 Co N 1Il t: t: n:l ... I- o >. c...... Q) t: 0:: 5 <C () ... :E Ql U 0 I- () UI ~ :a: CIl r:: Cll ...J UI CIl r:: Cll ...J :at .s:: - OJ r:: CIl ...J ... Cl 0 "" :;:; Cll 0- 0:: . ... J: U '" - 0- > ~ ..= E 0 ... u.. CIl E Cll z Cl 0:: :J <l: <C :E u I- ea ... - l: Q) U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ex:> (D ex:> N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D ex:> l!) C') (D '<I: 0 '<t ~ 0 ~ '<t (D '<I: 0 0 (D (D 0 ex:> '<I: (D (D I'- N C') ~ (D ex:> '<t C') '<t l!) C') 0 l!) ex:> (D (D (D I'- (D (D ex:> (D I'- ~ ~ '<t '<t N N (D '<t N '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t (D (D (D (D (D '<t '<t '<t (D (D '<t 0 0 l!) l!) 0 0 0 I'- '<t I'- ex:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol I'- I'- (D ~ ~ 0 ex:> 0 N I'- (D (D '<t 0 0 ~ Ol l!) I'- '<t ~ Ol ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ N N 0 ~ ~ 0 N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'- I'- CD Ii) I'- '<t 0 ex:> ex:> I'- Ii) (D ~ ~ (D 0 (D (D N 0 (D ~ '<t I'- I'- 0 0 '<t Ol ex:> I'- Ol Ol 0 I'- l!) l!) Ol ~ I'- (D l!) ex:> l!) '<t (D 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ Ctl Ctl ~ I~ Ctl iU > > > (1) (1) (1) '0 ::J ::J 3: 3: ::J 3: 0 0 -"" -"" 0 -"" Ctl ce '0 ce '0 '0 '0 ~ '0 ~ '0 ce ~ '0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Ctl '0 ~ Ctl '0 ~ '0 Ctl '0 ~ 0:: Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl a. ~ Ctl a. Ctl Ctl ~ a. ~ Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl ~ > ~ > > > > > 0 > ~ > > > c Ctl (1) Ctl (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) 0:: (1) Ctl (1) (1) '0 co (1) - '0 (1) - '0 (1) ~ .0 ::J .0 ::J ::J ::J ::J Ctl ::J .0 Ctl ::J Ctl ~ Ctl ~ ::J Ctl C ~ ::J Ctl ::J ce Ctl 0 0 Ctl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ctl 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ce 0:: ce ce ce ce ce cece 0:: ~ ce ce ce 0:: ce ce c c c Q ~ tIl (j) CD C Q.) <f) C (1) .Q C Ctl (1) 0 ~ [ ~I~ .~ .~ <f) .9! - - -1(1)1'01 ;;I~ '0 C ~ - '0 .;; '0 - C --(1) l!) '0 l!) C > '0 - m n Cll () ("'l ~ 0 "'-- <U ~ 0 '" > ~ m <U 0 Cll Cll 0 c31U5 ri c3 Cf) c31c3 0 0 , 0 0 0 0:: .....J ',. ..::J U5 0 0 0:: 0 U '0 '0 '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Ctl Ctl Ctl iU iU Ctl iU > > > > '0 (1) (1) (1) (1) ~ 3: 3: 3: Ctl ::J ::J ::J ::J > 0 0 0 -"" -"" 0 -"" (1) ce ce ce '0 '0 ~ '0 '0 ~ ce '0 ~ '0 '0 Ctl ~ Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl '0 '0 ~ Ctl ~ ::J 0:: Ctl Ctl Ctl 0 Cll a. 0 0 a. Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl a. Ctl 0 ~ ~ ~ 0:: > 0:: 0:: 0 0 ~ > > ce C Ctl Ctl Ctl (1) (1) (1) '0 0:: 0:: Ctl (1) (1) .!!1 ~ .0 '0 - - Ctl .0 - '0 Ctl Ctl .0 .0 E ::J Cll E E Ctl ::J Ctl Ctl ::J '0 ~ ~ ~ 0 C C ~ 0 ce Ctl 0 Ctl Ctl 0 0 0 0:: 0 0 Ctl 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ce 0:: ce ce :-g ce "Q "Q - ~ ce ce 0:: ce 3: 0:: C 0:: 0:: C t en C Ctl 0 Ctl Ctl C (1) (1) OJ Ctl C (1) 0 C C g (1) - - - (1) (1) '0 (1) (1) '0 C C - (1) '0 '0 ~ -"" ::J C '0 l!) C C (1) l!) 0 l!) C (1) Ctl 0 Ctl Ctl I'- Ctl Ctl C ~ 0 I'- C C ~ .2: I'- :2: Ctl ~ 0 Ctl 0 .....J U Cf) 0:: , Cf) Cf) a. 0 0 , a. a. 0 <( .....J , .....J Cf) 0 0 0:: .....J I I '0 '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ iU iU Ctl Ctl Ctl > > > (1) (1) (1) 3: 3: ::J ::J ::J -"" -"" 0 0 0 ~ ~ '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 ce ce ce '0 '0 '0 '0 Ctl Ctl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ a. a. Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl '0 '0 '0 Ctl '0 > > > > > > > > > > 0 0 0:: 0:: 0:: ~ ~ ~ 0:: (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) 0:: 0:: Ctl Ctl Ctl (1) (1) (1) (1) CO CO .0 .0 ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J I ~ (1) ~ .0 IE ::J ::J ::J ::J C ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C OJ '0 '0 Ctl Ctl Ctl 0 0 0 0 ce ce ce ce ce ce 0 0 :-g :-g :-g 0:: 0:: -0 ce ce ce ce - - ce ce ce C C ~ ~ ~ ~ I g I g 0:: 0:: 0:: a: <f) en en en (1) (1) C .9! .Q! Q! Q! C 0 .Q Ctl Ctl Ctl .;; .;; .;; s '0 '0 (1) I ~ C C (1) (1) (1) .- - - - (1) (1) - - - .~ - C C C '0 '0 C C C C Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 > Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl Ctl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U .....J .....J :.:; a. a. a. 0:: 0:: Cf) Cf) Cf) a. 0 0 ~ N OjD O. ~ N 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t l!) (D (D 't~ r-- ~ N N C') Ol '<t l!) r-- I'- CXl 0 ~ (D r-- CXl l!) C') N ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N C') C') C') '<t l!) l!) (D (D (D r-- r-- r-- r-- I'- ~ , ~ - en ea w iJ.. - C (1) E -C () Ctl - - <( 0:: :J <( (1) :::<: r . + I'- .- '<I: C 0 ~ 0') 0 -C en <f) - C (1) E '0 OJ (1) ... en Cll '0 >- r:: () Cll C - (1) l/) ~ ~ '<t N l/) ::J () 0 ..... 0 C CD N ...J 0 <t M () ..... ..... OJ (1) C -C :;:; - !!l E Cll u :a: 0 ~ - - > Ul - 0 Cll C (1) UI ..... :a: ~ Cll (1) :a: II Cll ~ V r:: '0 CIl Ul Cll .~ C ~ ...J Cll :a: - ~ ...J r:: Ctl Cll CIl 1:" Cll () , - r:: ... 0 Cll Cll ~ I- ...J 0- 0 .0 <( :2: u l- . - t: CIl E CIl Cl l'Cl t: l'Cl :2: >- l.) t: CIl .... .... ::::l l.) t: ~ 0 _U :J t: <(g co.l!l 0.... o 0 N ~ t: l'Cl ~.= a.~ (I) t: .k:: g <(~ :E CIl o 0 I-u ,... t: CIl - 1/1 >- CJ) III ~ :z: Gl c: III ..J III Gl c: III ..J =l:I: ..c: OJ c: Gl ..J ... i5 0 .:0: :;::: III D:-o:: ... J:U .:0:- a.> "" t= E 0 ... LI. Gl E III Z 0 0:: ::J oCt 0(0 000 00'<1' 00000 '<1'0(0(0'<1' OO(O(OC'"i'<l' ~ 000 O(ON OONC"l ~~ ~ 00 00 NC"l 000 N'<I'O '<I'I.C)O> 00 00 0> 0> 00 000 t-O> 0000 (00'<1'0 C"l'<l''<I'(O 000000 "':OOI.C)I.C)O(O ~T"""V,......c.oC"") '<I'(O(O(O(ON(ONN(O(O(O(O (0 (0 (0 '<I' (0 (0(0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 N '<I' '<I' (0 0~00000001.C)1.C)000000000000000000 oro~OT"""ro~,......m"""'NO~OT"""N~~~m~~~~~roOT"""O NOT"""T"""T"""T"""NOOOT"""T"""O~NNOOOOT"""T"""T"""T"""T"""T"""T"""T"""T""" ~C"")T"""VVT"""NT"""VT"""VC"")mroT"""vromromN~vrom~M~o (01.C)1.C)C"lC"lOO(oC"l'<l'OOOOO>OOC"l'<l'I.C)'<I'r-oot-OOO>O>t-(OOOO>~1.C) OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~O "0 ell o . 0::0 i3E-g"O ell 0 0 ell <I) '" 0 co ",0::0:: _ 0 ~ c -"co-15o ~ Q) .- .... I~ g~lg ~ ~ c: "S;: :>OO:::i "0 ell o 0:: "0 ell o 0:: "0 "0 "0 ell ell ell o "0 0 0 0:: ell 0:: 0:: .:y:. o-c..c "'0 ~ c 0:: ell <.) <I) ell C "0 _....... oco>o "" CO ~ Q) "'0 ~ 0::: &5 "C a:: ~ 0 L.L.. <I) ell ell", 0", L.L.. -g 0:: I lo... 00... ......... ~ '0 C ~U5a:: <l>15~i5 20:: 0 "' - t c'" ~ ~ ell .- ", - ~.e- ~",,.,,,. ;-Q'" "0 <I) .cr 0 ~ a. u... ~ ~ o ~ 8. a E -g ~ <I) '<I' '8 8...s: o ..r:: I- .- co ~ c U) O.!:::: > <.9(f)<i:s:E><.9Q..:J<.9<(::i "0 ell o 0:: ~-ga> ~ "'0 -g-5-g ell 0 .~ ell ell 0 ell 0 350::0 u:-g~ 0::350:: ==~- dJoc *==~ .o"'C.o :::::0::.8 -ro.o"'O Q)a:IDT"""Q)t~ .:Y:.03a::T""" "0(1)"0'<1'''00<:' 10"0(1)'<1' I.C) c ceO is .- I.C) E ~ c (f) !'-..ro roCf)O~>!'-..~," ">Q..>:J<.9<i:::i', t:>Q..:J "0 "0 "0 "0 ell ro "0 ell "0 ell "0 o . 0 ell 0 ell 0 ell 0::0 0:: ~ 0:: ~ -g 0:: ~ -gi3E "O-gi3(1)<I) .Y. "0 -gi3 .Y. <I)~-gi3 .Y. smi ~sm~~ ~ ~~sm"O ~-S",sm~.~ ~ u...co~-go::~cooo u: o::~u...co~ u:*~~u...co~o u:-g Q)=:-ocQ)~ -+-' l-ocU5Q)==a:: 1I-+-,C1...0):= 10 ~.oma::Bco~~o.o ~a::o ~.o ~U5?3oo~.o~~0 ~a:: ~~~ ~':y:'1- I- ~ ~.~':y:'I-C Q) OC':y:'l-ro~ Q) ~~~i~~~~~~'8i~i~~~~'8~~~~~~i~'8~ Eell~~>Eell~ell(f)0~>~Eell~(f)o.c<l)5Eell~~(f)0~ >O<(::i ><.9>:J<.9<(::i >0:J<.9(f)~> ><.9<.9:J<.9<( __ I "0"0"0"0 roro-g-g ~~~~ ~~~~ . ~~~~~o::o::o::o:: 1-1- "'0"'0"'0"'0 "'0"'0"'0 000 0 o..c..c..c..c ellell.Y..Y.ZZellellellell"O"O"O ellellellZZZZZ<.)<.)<.)<.) Q.. a. ~ ~ <I) <I) 0 0 0 0 ell ell ro <I) 0 0 0 ell ell ell ell "O"O"O<I)<I)~~~~o::o::o::o::ooo>O::O::O::~ellell~~<I)<I)<I)<I) rororo--~~cc a::a::a::.c I-I-I-I-I-mmmm oooellelldJdJ <I)<I)<I)<I)ccco~~~~~~~~======== o::o::o::<.9<.9~~~~<I)~~~SSS<l)"O"O"OEEE E-"-"-"-" ___ccQ)Q)<~~~~~wwm~~._.- E 1-1-1-1- o~~<I)<I)"O"O.c.cOOOOggggu...O::O::ellellellellell<l)<I)<I)<I) ~&8."O"Ooo~~EEEE.c>_cc>_ell<l)<I)<I)~~~E~-g-g-g-g I- I- I- 0 0 0 0 > ~,c .c_ c "" - - - "" "" - "" <i:<i:<i:<.9<.9<.9<.9~~EEEE::i::i::i~Q..Q..a.~~~~~>>~> <( :E o I- - III (I) ~ .c 1::0 O~ Z 000 000>0 0>0>0 ~ 000 ~NO> 000 ~~~ ~ N ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N~NOOOO~N~NOOOOOOO NNoo~~mo~~NN~N~Mv~m NNNNC"l'<l''<I''<I''<I''<I'I.C)I.C)I.C)(O(O(O~ __.__._~.~_^____ '.'_"__"__'_~ ~,...'"'__~__'_,_" _~_,__~._",,,__,,~,.._,_~_ ',_ ..__,_.;....-.,..'--..,h_.'.~~_. e::: - :J <( co c C N 1::1- o c. Q) e::: ~U :e: ()- I-u 0 0 0 0 0 '<t <Xl 0 N It) N N ~ CD N N N 0 0 0 0 0 I'- '<t 0 N N ~ ~ 0 CD N Cll It) It) '<t '<t 0 0 0 0 '0 rn '0 0 E ~ a: rn CIl > en (!) - (!) en :J ~ :J rn c 0 D.. (!) > rJ) Cll en <l: c _ c ~~I~I ~I~ E..::J $:;"":J ~ ctI l::: ctI :2: '0 rn ~ '0 0 '0 a: a: (!) l::: rn .~ 0 .c en ~ CIl a: () en 0 ... rn rn ... c (!) D.. - :J 0 Cll en .0 U - ~ g rn c (!) l::: "" .~ '0 0 C C C U s 0 $: rn :.:J Cll > l::: 0 - ctI '0 1:: rn 0 g a: '0 rn r/) .c 0 () (!) (!) a: l::: rn .~ > ctI (!) ~ .;:: en ... Cll 0 0 en rn - == - D.. ~ .- .- .0 .0 .0 en ~ ~ ~ l::: (!) (!) (!) c :J '0 '0 '0 .~ 0 c c c rn rn rn ~ > > > ... CIl N 0 0 0 - '<t It) I'- ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ E ::> "0 > OJ U .~ OJ <Jl OJ C '" .. '<t '" .8 '0 OJ C ~ Vi c 0 u >- .<'! 0 Q .?- C ~ ::> u '!2 C OJ E en x OJ 0 "' 00 .'!2 ": .c a> f- a> OJ E ::> "0 > OJ u "'C "2: OJ ~ <Jl Cll OJ "'C c C ~ Cll cD - en '0 en OJ '" ~ 0 Q) 0 ~ 0. <1i '" ...J E ~ ~ Cl 0 N N U C OJ ~ 5 Ql Ql c u :i!: 0 - '0 > f/I OJ .!!! <Jl 0 '" f/I ..0 Ql ..... :i!: .'!2 :i!: II Ql OJ V C :0 Ql f/I Cll i'l c .!!! ...J .'!2 Cll :i!: - 5 ...J c Ql Ql s; Cll U U - c ~ 0 Cll Ql :> f-- ...J D.. u c: (Il .... .... ::J U c: e::: 0 _u ::::> c: cd:g <'tl - .... o l"- e e N t:: o 0.- cu c: e::: g cd:~ :E (Il U(5 ....u .... c 0 ".:.::; ClI 0;-0:: ....u :I:_ if> ell .!!! :E CIl C III ..J ell '" C ClI ..J 'It .s:: - Cl C CIl ...l (Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N (.C) "": 0 0 co ~ 0 0 N "": 0 0 0 co 0 to "": "" co 0 0 (.C) "": <X:! co co co M N M "" ~ ~ N O'l co N M N M "" I.CJ O'l O'l O'l r-- O'l M co I.CJ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" co co N to N N to to (Q (Q '" "" (Q (Q co <0 '" <0 to <0 N "" <0 N N N 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N ~ co "": I'-- O'l ~ <0 0 ~ N I.CJ <q I'-- O'l I.CJ I.CJ I.CJ M I.CJ <X:! ~ ~ I'-- "" 0 N N N ~ N 0 0 N ~ M N N 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N M N ~ ~ r-- "" I.CJ ~ N N "" ~ <0 co ~ I.CJ co 0 O'l 0) I'-- M "" ro O'l r.o ro 0 O'l ~ I.CJ <0 I.CJ M ro <0 M "" co O'l M "": I.CJ "": <X:! ro I'-- I'-- 0) O'l I'-- (.C) ro 0) I.CJ "": "" "" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 co co co co 0 0 a co a a:: a:: a:: 0 "0 a:: "0 a:: co co L "0 L "0 "0 L "0 """- 0 "0 li "0 'E 0 '-' co '-' co OJ <1l '-' <1l a:: <1l <1l a:: <1l 0 <1l 0 > 0 <1l 0 e 0 ro OJ 0 <1l W a:: w a:: 'C a:: w a:: <1l a:; (J) a:: w > a:: > (J) w (l) CD 0 "0 CD .... 'D (J) CD .C 'D W (J) ::l I~ ~ <1l W I~ u.. W <1l <1l W 0 ~ ro <1l e := - 0 := , ~ 0 0... a ::l 0... .g w w iii w """- 0 w :.0 "0 :.0 :.0 a:: m :.0 ~ - a:: (J) - ..D ~ "0 a:: (l) > ~ .- ~ n:: ~ ~ a:; ~ ro ~ <1l (J) <l:: wa:: w J2 t:: """- w a:: t:: e """- w n:: t:: e ~ a ~ :~ 0 0... ~ e I:~ ~ "0 "0 ~ "" 18 'D "" "0 ::;; "0 "" g I~ -E "" e w I.CJ e w e I.CJ E e w 0 L: E e ~ w e .SO e 'S ~ ro .~ I'-- <1l <1l (JJ .'= I'-- e <1l (JJ 0 E E <1l e (JJ ~ ~ (JJ > 0.. , > ti: > :::> <( , ~ > 0.. ::::J t.9 (JJ <i s: > t.9 0.. ::::J ~ ..:J s: ~ :::> "0 u "0 '0 <1l <1l <1l "0 <1l a a 0 ro a a:: a:: a:: a '0 a:: '0 a:: ro <1l '0 L "0 .c "0 .c w 0 '0 .c "0 a co '-' ro u w w <1l U -'" a:: ro '-' w a:: a:: w a ro 0 <1l > > a:; 0 ro e e 0 <1l W > > a:: w a:: w .C 'C a:: (j) "0 ro - :::i (J) a:: (j) > 'C .c Ul 'C u 1!: L OJ 'C (l) CD 0 0 CD ro u.. 2: Ul (l) 0 "0 u (J) 0 W ro W iii (j) 0 , w ro (j) 0 ro <1l ro - 0 - - L - - (j) w W '0 .!!1 a:: .$ - c 0.. w """- (j) 0 w 0... m ..D a:: ro :.0 0 ..D a:: :.0 (f) ::l m :.0 L ~ a:: CD :.0 ~ ~ L ro ro L e a:; 5; 0 Ul L ro 0 (J) ~ -'" w t:: -'" w .c w ~ t:: .C -'" w 0 ~ c -'" w 0... L t:: .~ e w U ~ 0 '0 g 0 '0 Ul '0 "" g ~ 0 "0 ~ "" '0 I:~ 0 '0 Ul "" Ie :~ "0 E e E c "= c E e 0 L: W E ~ ~ ~ c e <1l L ro ::l ro (f) L <1l (JJ a (1i ::l 'S (JJ E E E E ro L .c w E 0 <1l > <i > t.9 > ::::J <i > u :::> t.9 (JJ -' s: > t.9 t.9 :::> <i CD s: > 1 i; U '0 U u U <1l <1l ro ro <1l a a 0 :: a 0 L L .c .c .c a:: a:: a:: u -" a:: a:: t:: t:: t t t ro ~ '0 U '0 '0 '0 0 a 0 a 0 .c .c .c 0 ro -'" """- Z Z <1l ro u '0 U <1l <1l ro Z Z Z Z Z '-' '-' '-' w w a:: 0... e c ro m w w 0 0 <1l m <1l w 0 0 a m <1l <1l > > 'D U .$ ~ ~ ::l ::l a:: a:: 0 0 0 > a:: a:: a:: '(1i w w w 'C .C (J) u.. u.. a:: a:: a:: ~ <1l <1l <1l (l) (l) (l) 0 0 (J) <1l ell c e (j) w 'C L ~ L L ro ell , , 0 g ~ I~ f- f- f- I- a a t.9 w w CJ w w w c c c := "" - := := 0... a:: a:: - = > > ro m 0 a 0 :.0 :.0 :.0 :.0 :.0 - <l:: <l:: w u u ~ E E E E E Ul t t:: c .!!! w -'" """- I"@ .~ ~ ~ n:: a: a:: L L L L L C W u is -E -E 0 0 <1l ro ro ro <1l w w W w w I:~ g 18 "0 a 0 E E e c c w CJ w 'E 'E E E E u "0 "0 U "0 ~ ~ <1l C C C e c L L (5 0 a ~ ~ E E 'S; .S; 'S; w c c C <1l ro <1l <1l ro ro ell ro ro <1l ~ <i <i t.9 t.9 t.9 ~ ~ :::i :::; :::i (f) 0:: 0:: 0:: l- I- l- f- I- > > > > > 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 M "" O'l 0 ~ N ~ N M M "" I.CJ c.o ro O'l 0 ~ N 0) 0 ~ "" l!) I'-- ~ N N N N M "" "" "" l!) I.CJ l!) <0 <0 O'l 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0 <0 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .01 .... E o .... LL cd: :E U .... - CIl t/) E CU ~ s: c.s:: o::t:: ::> 0 <l::Z ..'~~------^.~--~-~~"'---- ---'--'--'''~'"'-'''-~-''~----~--'- ,~ Q' g c- o ~ "C L III "C C III - (f) (f) - - 0 '" '" '" ..J ""'i '"' 0> C :;:; CIl III U ::!! - :> '" 0 CIl '" ,... ~ CIl II CIl ::!! v c CIl ell III C .!!! ..J III ::!! ... ..J C Ql Q) III t.l - C ... 0 III CIl f- ..J a. - ::: <l1 E <l1 Cl CIl ::: CIl :E >. () c:: <l1 ... ... ::l () ::: 0:: 0 _u :J ::: ~2 f'-E 0'" o 0 N ;t c:: 't ~ 01- c.z. Q) ::: 0:: g ~C: :: <l1 (.) 0 r-U E <l1 - II) >. C/) VI .9! :E '" c: III ..J VI III c: OJ ..J 'II: .::: Cil c: '" ..J ... Cl 0 :;:; "'" III ":-~ "'u :I:_ ""'> a. 0 l- E 0 ... u. '" ~ c: III Z Cl a:: ;:) <l: - C/l ro W 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ c:o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <0 ~ c:o <0 "<C 0 <<:> 0 ~ "<C <0 ~ ~ <0 <0 0 co ~ <<:> <0 r- N ~ <0 c:o 7 r- en C'i 0 en c:o N <!i r- <0 <0 c:o <0 r- ~ ~ ~ 7 7 N <0 7 N 7 7 7 7 <0 <D <D <0 7 7 7 <D <0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ r- c:o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'> r- 7 ~ ~ 0 0'> N r- <0 <0 7 0 ~ 0'> en r- 7 ~ 0'> ~ 0 N ~ N N ~ ~ 0 N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO c:o '"" c:o en ~ 0'> r- 4') r- ~ ~ L() 7 <0 C') N c:o C') N r- r- 0 "<C 0'> c:o O'l c:o 0 r- en en O'l r- <0 L() c:o en 7 <0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'D 'D 'D ~ ~ ~ ro ro fu fu ro in > > > <ll <ll OJ 'D ::; ::; :;: :;: ::; :;: 0 0 .:<: .:<: 0 .:<: ro CO 'D CO 'D 'D ~ "E ~ 'D CO ~ '2 0 ~ ~ ~ ro 'D ro ~ 'D rn 'D 0:: ro rn rn 0.. ~ ro 0.. ro ~ 0.. ~ ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ~ > ~ > > > > > ~ > > > C C1l <ll C1l (!) (!) (!) OJ OJ OJ C1l OJ OJ ~ .D :; .D :; :; til <ll - 'D .D OJ til 'D .!.!! C1l ::; C1l rn ::; ro ::; ~ 0 ~ 0 0 <..9 ::; 0 <..9 0 ~ ::; <..9 ::; 0 CO C1l ro 0 0 rn 0 0 0 !~ CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0:: CO CO CO ~ a: CO CO ~ ~ ~ C c 1ii ~ ~ E (!) rn CD (!) (!) if) C OJ 9 c E if) .Q if) (1) C 'D S (!) 'D Ifg S; 'D S ::; c - 0 0 0 L() (!) 0 'D en c (5 'D 0 ro o C1l "- C1l ~ ro r- 0 ro ro ro ro 0 10 U) OIU) 0 0 <..9 , 0 <..9 <..9 er:: -' if) 0 <..9 er:: 0 0 'D 'D '2 '2 ~ ~ ro ro ro I iii fu '" fu > > > > 'D (!) (!) .S2 Q) iil ::; ::; ::; :;: :;: 0 :;: > 0 0 0 -'" -'" .:<: OJ CO CO CO 'D ~ 'D 'D ~ CO 'D ~ 'D 'D ro ro ro ro ro 'D ~ ro ~ ::;a: ro 2 ro 0 0.. 0 0 0.. ro ro ro 0.. ro 0 ~ roa: 0:: 0:: 0 ~ > > CO c ro ro OJ (!) 'D 0:: ro .!.!! .S2 Q) ~ .D .D .D ro ro ro .D 'D 'D C1l ~ ~ ~ 1i!5 i!5 i!5 0 c ~ ::; ro ro :J 0 CO ro ro ro <..9 <..9 0:: 0 ro 0 <..9 0 0 0 ~ CO CO aJ :2 'D 'D g CO CO 0:: aJ :;: a: c iY 0:: c t c E .3 .3 Q) OJ E c (!) .9 c OJ C 'D 'D ~ OJ 'D g .:<: :J C L() C C (!) l!) OJ <ll L() C C OJ 'D ro 0 m r- ro m C (5 "- .S:; c 0 "- S m ~ 0 ro 0 -' 0 if) , if) if) a. <..9 , 0.. 0.. CJ <( , :.J if) CJ CJ 0:: -' 'D 'D 'D ~ ~ ~ iU ;;-; '" '" m ,; ;; > ., QJ OJ QJ :;: :;: ::; ::; ::; .:<: .:<: 0 0 0 ~ ~ 'D 'D 'D '2 'D aJ aJ aJ 'D 'D 'D ro C1l ~ ~ ~ ~ 'D 'D ~ ... ~ 0.. 0.. m ro ro ro C1l C1l ro C1l C1l ro > > > > > 'D 'D m m C1l 'D > > > 0 0 0:: 0:: ~ ~ roO:: .E:l .E:l .S2 <ll (!) .S2 <ll 0:: a: ro m <ll <ll <ll :; .0 .0 .0 C1l ro ::; ::; :J ::; ..~ i!) ~ ::; ::; ::J <..9 CJ 0 0 0 0 0 c c l.g ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 'D 'D m ro C1l CO CO aJ CO co 'D 0:: 0:: CO aJ CO 'D aJ CO aJ c c ~ 1il ii iY iY <ll (!) C ~ ... L C 0 0 E ro E if) if) if) (!) (!) <ll (!) !~ g .S; 'S; S 'D 'D QJ C <ll <ll 'is 'is c C c: <ll ro C1l C1l (5 (5 ~ (5 0 0 0 S S c c m ro m m ro c 0 0 0 <..9 CJ <..9 0 0 0 ..J :.J :.J n= n= 0:: 0:: if) if) if) n= 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 l!) <0 ~ N "- NN C') O'l 7 l!) "- c:o 0 ~ (0 "- c:o L() ~ ~ ~ N N N MM C') 7 L() l!) <0 <0 "- "- r- "- r- N I - , ~ :: () r- ro .... - c: Q) (.) ,0 => ...'1 2, 'C ~ III "'C <= '" - rn -,t :'.. rn 0 0 ..~ :0 ..J .. Ol C "'" Q) Q) u :a :> '" 0 '" VI :E .9! .... :E II Q) V <= Q) '" C1l t: Q) ...J III :E - ...J c: iii Q) Q) <.) - t: ~ 0 '" Q) I- ..J a. ~ ~ ;:; - 'I> ~ [f) - ~ ;:; ~ = "' eJJ " = " ::; a:: ~ '" = - "' :) ... ... ~ = " = (0 0 0 u = 0 0 .~ N - " - ... 0 1: Q. 'I> ~ 0 ;; a. ... .... Q) c a:: = = ~ 0 u ::E ... (J ~ l- e u N N '" 0 to 0 to N N '" 0 '" N 0 to N 0 N 0 to Ol I'- I'- to "" 0 "" Ol ~ ...- '" "" I'- to Ol "" N N ...- "" ...- N ...- <0 '" ...- I'- ...- '" '" "" a:i to to I'- "" I'- '" ...- I'- ~ ...- ...- N to ...- N ...- ...- ...- ...- to to to to ...- ...- ...- to ...- ...- '" '" Ol 0 ...- 0 Ol '" '" I'- "" '" N 0 Ol '" 0 I'- 0 Ol N to '" ~ ~ 0 '" N I'- '" "" ...- ~ ~ Ol '" '" '" ~ '" ~ 0 N ~ N N ~ ~ 0 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ol N to 0 '" Ol N ...- 0 Ol 0 I'- '" "" '" N Ol ~ "" '" '" Ol 0 to Ol to 0 Ol '" to "" '" Ol to '" I'- I'- to I'- ...- 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:' '" '" ro ~ ro ro > > >. >. > >. .!!! .!!! ro ro .!!! ro '" ::> ::> " " ::> " 0 0 -'" -'" 0 -1': ro <Xl '" <Xl '" '" ~ '" ro '" <Xl '" 0 ro ~ ~ ro '" ro ro 1:' ro '" ro ro ro 0.. ~ 0.. 0.. ro 0:: ro ro ro ro ro > ~ > > > > > c ro OJ ro .!!! .!!! OJ > OJ OJ .!!! ro > OJ > .!!! ~ .D ::; .D ::> ::> ro .!!! ::; ro '" .D OJ ro '0 .!!! ro ::> ::; ro ::> ro ro 0 ~ 0 0 (9 ::> 0 (9 0 0 ro (9 0 ::> 0 <Xl ro "" 0 0 0 <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl to;- <Xl <Xl 0:: <Xl m <Xl 0:: <Xl <Xl '"' ~ ~ ~ c c: c: JJ c ro ro .!!! .!!! OJ <f) c OJ Q c ro <f) OJ 0 <f) - OJ ro ::> C C - - '" 0 s OJ '" '" "" c s '" ii ;; 0 0 0 0 0 0> 0 0 0 ro ro ro ~ ro to;- o ro ro ro ro 0 (/) 0 (/) 0 0 (9 z 0 (9 (9 0:: -' (/) 0 (9 0:: 0 0 '" 1:' 1:' '" ro ro ro ro > > > >. >. > >. '" .!!! .!!! .!!! ro ro .!!! ro ~ " " " ro '" ::> ::> ::> ::> > 0 0 0 -'" -1': 0 -1" .!!! ro <Xl tIl <Xl '" ~ '" '0 <Xl '" '" 0 ro ro ro ro ro '" ~ ro ~ ::> 0:: ro ro ro 0 n. 0 0 0.. ro [ll ro 0.. ro 0 ro ro ~ 0:: 0:: 0:: 0 > > tIl c ro OJ OJ '" 0:: ro .!!! OJ .!!! ~ .D .D -e OJ ro OJ OJ ro ro -e ::> ro '" ::> '" ro ro ~ 0 c ro 0 <Xl ro ro 0> (9 "" 0> 0> (9 0:: 0 ro 0 (9 0 0 0 tIl <Xl <Xl :Q I'- '" '" 1il <Xl <Xl 0:: <Xl " '"' 0:: c --'- iX' iX' c t c C ro ro ro OJ OJ 0> ro c OJ Q c OJ C C C OJ '" - OJ OJ '" 0 c C OJ '" ro ::> "" 0 e- '0 -'" C 0 C C 0 "" s ~ 0 0> ro 0 ro I'- ro ro to;- ro ro 0 -' 0 (/) , (/) (/) a: (9 z a: 0.. (9 <( ::J (/) (9 (9 0:: -' '" '" 1:' ro ~ ro ro >. >. > > > ro ro .!!! .!!! .!!! " " ::> ::> ::> -'" -'" 0 0 0 1:' '" ro ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" <Xl tIl <Xl '0 '" ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ro '" '" ro ro ro ~ ro 0.. 0.. ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro > > > > > 0 0 0 0 [ll [ll ro 0 > > > OJ OJ .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! .!!! 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: ro ro ro 0:: OJ OJ OJ ro ro '" '" -e .D .D ::; ::; ::; ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> OJ OJ ro ro OJ (9 (9 0 0 0 0 0 c C 0> 0> ro ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro ro 0> <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl tIl '" '" :Q <Xl <Xl <Xl c c 1il 1il iX' iX' 0:: 0:: <Xl <Xl <Xl on <f) <f) OJ OJ c ~ ~ .~ C 0> 0> Q Q ro ro ro 0:: .;; .;; s '" '" OJ ro c c OJ OJ C C C OJ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0> S S c .~ '" '" c ro ro ro 0 ro ro ro ro ro 0 0 0 (9 (9 (9 0 0 0 -' ::J ::J a: 0.. 0:: 0:: (/) (/) (/) a: ...- "" to ~ N I'- N <( '" Ol ...- '" I'- '" 0 ~ to I'- '" to ~ ~ ~ N N N '" N '" ...- "" '" to <D I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- N '" ~ ~ o on "! I'- ., "0 "- l'\l "0 N <0 l: l'\l ": "! .... '" M en I'- N ~ 0 ~ ~ en 0 0 N ..J .~ Cl C l: OJ :;:: '0 III '" OJ III '" t.) :iE OJ Ul E - 0 > III " Ul C! OJ III :iE .D ..... .8 :iE II III V l: ~ '" III Ul l'\l c OJ l: III ..J OJ U 0 OJ l'\l :iE .... 'g 0' ..J l: c'i: III 0 l'\l III <.l .... l: "- '0 OJ 0 l'\l III OJ ::> I- ..J D- o:: ill Affordable Housing ST A TEMENT OF ISSUE An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to detennine the County's success in providing affordable housing during the planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) - years 2004 through 2009; current status of available affordable housing in the County; and, needed modifications to the Housing Element. ISSUE BACKGROUND Chapter 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code (F AC) sets forth the minimum requirements for local govemment comprehensive plans. Specifically, Section 9J-5.010, FAC, sets forth the criteria for the establishment of housing goals, objectives and policies; housing data requirements; and future housing needs analysis to be used by local govemments for the preparation of their required housing elements. Pursuant to Section 163.3177 (6)(f), Florida Statutes, all local governments within the State are required to have a Housing Element as part of their comprehensive plan. This Element must include, "the provision for housing for all current and anticipated future residents of the jurisdiction; elimination of substandard dwclling conditions; the structural and aesthetic improvement of existing housing; the provision of adequate future housing, including housing for low-income, very low-income, and moderate-income families, mobile homes, and group home facilities and foster care facilities, with supporting infrastructure and public facilities; provision for relocation housing and identification of historically significant and other housing for purposes of conservation, rehabilitation, or replaccment; the fonnulation of housing implementation programs; and the creation or prcservation of affordable housing to minimize the need for additional local services and avoid the concentration of affordablc housing units only in specific arcas of the jurisdiction." The Collicr County Housing Element is consistent with the applicable proVISIOns of Florida Statutes. The Element provides the County with the necessary guidance to develop appropriate plans, programs and policies to crcatc an adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for all County residents. The Goal, Objectives and Policies contained within the Element demonstrate the County's commitment to mect identified and projected deficits in the supply of housing. Overview of Affordablc Housing Aetivities During the planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Rcport (EAR), the County successfully administered various State and Federal programs including, but not limited to, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds. HOME lnvestment Partnerships Program (HOME) entitlement funds, Emergency Shclter Grant funds, State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) funds, and funds authorized by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 - all of which funded numerous development and redevelopment activities. The range of funded activitics includes, but is not limited to. a single-family unit rchabilitation program, multi-family affordable rental unit devclopment, community park and infrastructure development, redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes, and homebuyer education programs. In total, the County has assisted individuals and families with down payment and closing costs in the amount of $11.571,965; fundcd residential rehabilitation I AtfiJrdahle Housing Major Issue projects in the amount of $3.1 08,884; and, assisted in the devclopmcnt of affordable-workforce housing projects by deferring impact fccs in the amount of $9.723.672.68. The programs and funding stratcgies identified above (and detailed, in part, in Table I. below), and contained within the Housing Element. enabled public/private partnerships between govemmentaI agcncics and the private, not-j(lr-projjt and for-profit providers of affordable housing within the community, to rcduce substandard housing, stabilize neighborhoods by rehabilitating abandoned and foreclosed homes and rcsidcntial properties. fund infrastructure projects, and fund new a('f()rdabie single-family unit 3nd multi-family unit projccts within the County. Table 1. Programs/Activities (June 2007- June 2009) Strategy/Tasks Down Payment Assistance Results 434 households assisted with a total of approximately $7.4 million Home Buyer Education Monthly home buyer education classes provided, with an estimated average monthly attendance of 35 persons Outreach Participated, hosted and presented at a multitude of housing events Loan Prequalification Over 600 persons pre-qualified for first mortgage financing Loan rnn50rtil)m 80 first mortgages approved and closed with Collier County Loan Consortium member banks Residential Rehabilitation 92 Residential properties rehabilitated Disaster Recovery Initiative Administered 10 DRI funded projects with a total grant award of $3.1 million Federal Grant Administration Administered $6.3 million in federal grants to 23 sub recipients A cq u is I ti 0 n / Rc ha b I Ii ta tl 0 n Two non-profits funded; 28 homes acquired, rehabilitated and sold to income qualified persons/families Neighborhood Stabilization Program Awarded $7.3 million. Properties have been acquired; services have been procured; administrative manual has been prepared and adopted ) Aj/orJuhle Housing MaioI' Issue Current Status of Available Affordable Housing Notwithstanding the successes referenced in the previous section, the County has not achieved its housing objective to create 1,000 new affordable-workforce housing units each year since the last evaluation period ended in 2004. The County, during the planning period for this Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), has approved approximately 4.214 affordable-workforce units, but only 728 of those units have been constructed (refer to Table 2.). Table 2. Collier County Affordable Housing Approvals (2004 -2009) Name Approval BCC District Tenure Units Approved Units Built Bosley PU D 2004 Buckley Mixed Use 2005 2 Owner Occupied 11 0 Arrowhead PUD 2005 5 Rental 186 186 Warm Springs 2005 5 Owner Occupied 72 0 Ave Maria 2005 5 Mixed 1,900 48 Rega I Acres 2005 S Owner Occupied 184 14 Palermo Cove 2005 3 Owner Occupied 52 0 Santa Barbara Landings 2005 3 Owner Occupied 29 0 Bristol Pines 2005 5 Owner Occupied 32 32 Cirrus Pointe 2005 4 Owner Occupied 44 0 Meridian Village PUD 2006 2 Owner Occupied 24 0 Rockedge PUD 2006 5 Owner Occupied 111 0 Liberty Landing 2006 5 Owner Occupied 162 90 Summit Lakes 2006 5 Owner Occupied 303 0 Kaicasa 2007 5 Owner Occupied 400 0 Faith Landing RPUD 2007 5 Owner Occupied 175 0 Tree Farm MPUD 2007 2 Owner Occupied 64 0 Boxwood RPUD '11("\, , OVvner Occupied ^' 0 LUUI J ~" Eden Gardens 2007 5 Rentaf 55 55 Wood crest 2007 S Owner Occupied 66 0 Total 4,214 728 Source: Collier County T cdmology & (jJS Support Section. July 2010 Tables 3. and 4. below reflect the existing and approved affordable-workf~)fce housing units within Collier County, as of July 2010. This information is based on the best available data, and the data sourccs are the Univcrsity of Florida's Shimberg Ccntcr for Housing Studies and the Collicr County Technology and GIS Support Section ofthc Growth Management Division. Table 3. Collier County Affordable Housing Inventory, 2010 Development Street Address General location Total Units (Built) Assisted Housing Inventory Bear Creek - Naples Belvedere Apartments Brittany Bay Brittany Bay II College Park Collier Housing Alternatives Crestview Park 2367 Bear Creek Drive 260 Quail Forest Boulevard 14815 Triangle Bay Drive 14925 Lighthouse Road 6450 College Park Circle 4211 Thomason Drive 2903 Lake Trafford Road Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Immokalee 120 162 184 208 210 10 208 , -, Affordable Housing Major Issue Crestview Park II Cypress Run Eden Gardens Eden Gardens II Eden Gardens Supportive Housing Esperanza Place Rental Farmworker Village Phase VI Garden Lake Apartments George Washington Carver Goodlette Arms Her Villas Immokalee Heritage Heron Park Housing Alternatives Of SW Florida Immokalee Apartments Immokalee Senior Jackson Apartments Jasmine Cay Laurel Ridge Main Street Village Noah's Landing Oakhaven Ospreys Landing Saddle brook Village Apartments Sanders Pines Saxon Manor Isles Apartments Saxon Manor Isles Apartments II So Vil!a$ !mmoka!ee Summer Glen Summer Lakes Apartments Summer Lakes II Timber Ridge of Immokalee Tuscan Isle Villas of Capri Whistler's Cove Whistler's Green Wild Pines of Naples II Willowbrook Place -""'i."~s.c'"-~~I-,,b___ p___ . Total 71S Crestview Drive 550 Hope Circle 1375 Boxwood Lane 1375 Boxwood Lane Marion Lake South of Westclox 2702 W. Immokalee Drive 1800 Farm Worker Way 1022 Garden Lake Circle 350 10th Street North 950 Goodlette Rd N 1109 Hickcock Lane 4250 Jefferson Lane 2155 Great Blue Drive 3401 21st Ave SW 601 W Delaware Ave 612 North 11th Street 326 Third St. 100 Jasmine Circle 5460 Laurel Ridge Lane 104 Anhinga Circle 10555 Noah's Circle 580 Oakhaven Circle 100 Ospreys Landing 8685 Saddle brook Circle 2411-2488 Sanders Pines Circle 105 Manor Blvd. 105 Manor Blvd. 1802 Custer Ave. 1012 Summer Glen Blvd. 5520 Jonquil Lane 5600 Jonquil Circle 2711 Wilton Court 8680 Weir Drive 7725 Tara Circle 11400 Whistler's Cove Blvd. 4700 Whistler's Green Circle 2580 Wild Pines Lane 1836 Ash Lane 1}0~ Wind.s(),,-_g_C~r~l~ Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Naples Naples Immokalee Naples Naples Naples Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Naples Naples Immokalee Naples Immokalee Naples Naples Immokalee Naples Naples 96 40 51 37 4 45 641 66 70 250 41 320 248 12 100 30 10 72 78 79 264 160 176 140 40 128 124 !mmoka!ee 35 Immokalee Naples Naples Immokalee Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Immokalee ____N--"P~_n_ 45 140 276 34 298 235 240 168 104 42 120 6161 Sourc'~' Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, July 2010 -I AffiJ/.dahle HOl/sing Major Issl/e Table 4. Collier County Affordable Housing Inventory, 2010 '<'/,::;",':'C)); <'''''>...:: ."'.'....:...:.........:' Developmen\; . J\ ',"' j;::'):.:;';.'::;::):; ';;;':;;':<>:.<;' ,...;,,1': Tenu.re. Total Units General Location Approvedl . . . " . ", Built Owner & Rental Owner Occupied Owner & Rental Rental Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner or Rental Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied OWller Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Owner Occupied Immokalee Naples Naples/lmm Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Immokalee Naples Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Naples Arrowhead PUD Artesia Point (Habitat) Ave Maria Bosley Apartments Botanical Place Boxwood RPUD Bristol Pines Buckley Mixed Use Carson Lakes Charlee Estates Cirrus Pointe Cypress Glen Faith Landing RPUD (Habitat) Heritage Bay DRI Independence Ka icasa Liberty Landing (Habitat) Meridian Village PUD North Naples Research & Technology Pa lermo Cove Regal Acres (Habitat) Rockedge PUD Santa Barbara Landings Summit Lakes (Vvaterways Villas) Trail Ridge (Habitat) Tree Farm MPUD Victoria Falls Warm Springs Woodcrest (Habitat) Total Source. Collier County Technology and GIS Support Section, July 2010 186/186 280/0 1900/48 303/303 64/64 41/0 32/32 11/0 83/83 122/122 44/0 10/10 175/0 160/66 156/156 400/0 162/90 24/0 4/0 52/0 184/14 111/0 29/0 303/0 204/204 64/0 110/110 72/0 66/0 5,352/1,488 Current and Projected Affordable Housing Demand The University of Florida's Shimberg Center fDr !lousing Studies has been designated by the Florida Legislature as the agency responsible for maintaining data on aftDrdable housing needs and household demographics for all counties in the stale of Florida. The majority of source data for the housing needs assessment comes from the 2000 U.S. Census and is updated \~/ith current information from building permit activity and property appraiser data. Tables 5a.-5e. reflect the Shim berg Center's 2010-2030 projections ofthc number of households in Collier County by income level, including very low-income, low-income and moderate- income personslhouseholds earning less than, or equal to. 50%, 80% and 120% of the County's area median income (AMI), respcctivcly. 5 Atfin'dable Housing Major Issue Tables 5a.-5e. Collier County Household Income and Cost Burdened Household Data for Years 2010 -2030 Table Sa. {Source: Shimberp Center Julv 2010\ 2010 Household Demographic Data Year Tenure Household Income Household Count 2010 Owner 0-30% AMI, 6490 , 2010 Owner 30.1.50% AMI I 7398 - 20101 Owner I 50.1-80% AMI 16942 I 2010 Owner I 80,01-120% AMI 21794 12010 Owner 120+% AMI! 49nS Total Owner Count i 101,862 ! 2010 ----+---- Renter 0-30% AMI i 5940 2010 Renter 30.1-50% A~i~~~~ 2010 Renter I 50.1-80% AMI! 8197 2010 Renter! 80,01-120% AMI i 5023 i 2010 I Renter I ~-. 120---% AMI ! 3393 , Total Renter Count i 32,806 i II Total Household Count: 134,668 i r--. I~-T I! I I II ~---------! 30.1-50% (cost burdened households) 19,97~ j 50+% (cost burdened households) i 15,9661 __L~__~,_____~ < 30% (not cost burdened households) i 98,726 j Table 5c. (Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010) 2020 Household Demographic Data Year Tenure Household Income Household Count I 2020 I Owner 0-30~;' AMI i 3107 I 12020 Owner r -.--~------3;~1~-SO__;~-~--. ..~~-;~ I._~ ~~mer l __.______~__~_~~~?% AMI_l_.____~?~j_~ I 2020 Owner 8001-J20'}S AMI i 271841 ~ 202~~~~~~_~___~_____~_____1~~",_% I'MI! ~~-~_Offi_5 r- __L__~___ Total ow~er_Co~~:~_~_~:. ! TW20 I Renter! __.__~_~% A~~____2~_33 1E_~enter I _ 301-50'};, AMI i_______~_'~~5. ~. 2020.~Rcnter! 50J.80% AMI! 96591 2020, Renter 80,01-120% AM'I-i--~)f)91 ~I 2020 i Renter 120"")'0 ~~~--I--"-~%~ i 1 I Total Renter Count ! 38,87;1 ..,---- , ' --.--------,- LL-I: Total Household Coun~_: 165,987 ! U I", i _ _~0.1-50% (cost burdened households) : I-T-- ~---:- - 50+% (cost b~rdened-.h-~~~~hofdS) ,- ! 24,367 ! 19,639 i =:: 30% (not cost burdened households) i 121,981 i Table Sb. (Source: Shimber" Center Julv 2010\ 2015 Household Demographic Data Year Tenure 2015 i Owner : 2015 i Owner '-1--. --- I 2015 Owner 20151 Owner 2015! Owner I t-t----- i 12015 Renter 2015 Renter I r '0151 , I' r~l. , ! ,2015 i Renter 1 Renter-[ i 1015 I Renter! .~ :__~_I , I - ,'--+- ! I I L-L-.__ Household Income 0-30% AMI 30,1-50% AMI 50.1-80% AMI 1 80,01-120% AMI 120+% AMI Total Owner Count 0-30% AMI 30.1-50% AMI 501.80% AMlj 80.01-120% AMI 120+% AMI Total Renter Count Total Household Count I 30.1-50% (cost burdened households) . :-r~- L 50+% (cost burdened households) .$. 30% (not ccst burdened households) ..~l --~--- Table Sd. (Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010) Household Count 7213 8296 18898 24208 54562 113,177 6490 4626 8880 6517 9123 35,636 148,813 21,971 : 17,631 109,211 2025 Household Demographic Data Year Tenure Household Income : 2025 ! OVllner I I i I ! i 2025 : Owner I '-r;-O-2-~r~~'~~r r j :025 i Ownt'r 1 :I---_-j---. i-- I 120:..:j Owner I I! ! I ~._-----+----------:. I i 2025 i Renter I ~--;-----'___'~'._4.__._________ i i 2025 I Renter I ~I-.._'~_.~- : 2025! Renter I -i~?_~_L~~-~~~- i 20251 Renter I ~--I-'..' -, r----------;- ! I I C--j 30.1-50% (cost burdened households) Household Count 0-30% AMI 9042 30.1-50% AMI 10673] . ---------.-. -~ 50.1-80% AMI 23919 RO,Ol-120% AMI 30303 120+% AMI 67698 Total Owner Count 141,635 0-30% AMI I 7762 -,--- 30.1-50"" AMI I 5465, 50.1--80% Ar~ 10394 j 80.01-120% AMI I 75711 120+% AMI I 107371 Total Re'~t~--;-~~~ntl 41,9291 Total Household Count 183,564 i 50+% (cost burdened households) .____i. S 30% (DQ!; cost burdened households) (j Affimlah/e Housing Major Issue 26,764 21,693 135,107 Table Se. (Source: Shimberg Center, July 2010) 2030 Household Demographic Data Year Tenure Household Income Household . Count 2030 Owner 0.30% AMI 9952 2030 Owner 30.1-50% AMI 11888 2030 Owner 50.1-80% AMI 26452 2030 Owner 80.01-120% AMI 33323 2030 Owner 120+% AMI 74116 Total Owner Count 155,731 2030 Renter 0-30% AMI 8356 2030 Renter 30.1-50% AMI 5848 2030 Renter 50.1-80% AMI 11077 2030 Renter 80.01-120% AMI 8026 2030 Renter 120+% AMI 11459 Total Renter Count 44,766 I Total Household Count 200,497 I 30.1-50% (cost burdened households) 29,068 50+% (cost burdened households) 23,669 ~ 30% (!!.Q! cost burdened households) 147,760 As the tables above show, a total of 77,037 houscholds in the County will earn less than 120% of the AMl in year 2010. This number is projected to grow lo 114,922 households by year 2030. Funher, thc County's projected total household count by ycar 2030 will be approximately 200,497. In addition to the number of households projected to eam less than 120% of the AMI, thc cost burdened household projections indicate that in 2010 approximately 35,942 households (27%) are cost burdened, spending greater than thirty percent of their household income on housing related cxpenses, and that number is projected to increase to 52.737, or 26 percent, of the County's households by year 2030. Comprehensive Plan Implemcntation to Address Affordable Housing The data suggest there is a current deficit of available affordable-workforce housing units; howcvcr, the actual deficit is unknown. The downturn in the housing market over recent years has increased thc number of market rate, unrestricted (not subject to regulatory control of rcntal or sale price, occupant income level, time period to rcmain affordable, etc.), affordable units within the County. In fact, during the seeond quarter of 2009, approximately 68.1 %] of the units sold were affordablc to households eaming the local area median income. However, more reccnt data from the fourth quarter of 2009 rcvcal that only 60.80// of the residential units sold wcre affordable, indicating the trend may be reversing. As a rcsult. maintaining a requirement to provide restricted affordable-workforce housing units within the County is both prudent and necessary. " Source. Collier County Housing and Human Services, April 2010 Source. Ibid 7 Affi}rdable Housing Major Issue In order to keep pace with the demand for affordable-workforce housing within the County, the production of both affordable rental and homeownership units will need to continue. The following is a summary of the projected increase in cost burdened households in Collier County, by year and growth rate. 2010 - 2015 2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025 2025 - 2030 Average Annual Increase in Cost Burdened Households 732 Units/year 881 Units/Year 890 Units/Year 856 Units/Year Years Based on the above data from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies, July 2010, the County will need, on average per year, approximately 840 units over the next twenty years to meet projected affordable-workforce housing demand. This total reflects a 160 unit decrcase in the number of units required per year from the last evaluation period ending in year 2004. This data suggest that Goal 1 of the Housing Element, which requires 1000 affordable-workforce units per year to be constructed, can be decreased to approximately 850 units. It should be noted that as economic conditions eontinue to fluctuate, so will the future need for affordable-workforce housing within the County. However, there is presently, and will continue to be, a need for an additional supply of restricted affordable-workforce housing. In an effort to meet the above referenced affordable-workforce housing demand within the County, the Housing Element providcs thc necessary guidanee for the development of future plans. programs and policies to create the required adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing units for all current and future residents. Additionally, the County will continue to work with not-for-profit and for-profit providers of affordable housing to increase private/public partncrships and financial incentives; address local development regulations and land use issues; continue to eliminate substandard housing; and, continue to increase the number of affordable housing programs and funding opportunities to its residents, in order to meet the projected aff{)rdable-workf"orce housing needs for area residents, including vcry low, low and moderate income households. It should be noted that at the December 16, 20lO Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing, the BCC was presented an in-house affordable housing inventory study in an attempt to estimate the number of units that would qualify under the affordable housing program's various income thresholds. Based upon the BCC direction from that meeting. the results of that study have been provided as support documentation to the 201 I EAR. R Affordable Housing Major Issue Concurrency Management STATEMENT OF ISSUE An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) for their effect on managing concurrency of development throughout the County. ISSUE BACKGROUND The purpose of the Capital Improvement Element is to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities at adopted levels of service (LOS) concurrent with the impacts of development. This is implemented by means of a concurrency management system that measures the potential impact of a development permit application on minimum acceptable level of services, as adopted in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. Concurrency management provisions for the COU11lY include the guidelines and standards set forth by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5. Florida Administrative Code, and describe the administrative procedures pertaining to the application of concurrency and establish guidelines for applying concurrency to each respective type of public facilities. The County manages concurrency to effectively achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards, 10 ensure that infrastructure capacity is available when needed to support development and that development pays its fair share toward thc cost of improvemcnts. Comprehensive Plan Implementation & Program Assessment Over the last five years. the County has ~;ubmitted financially feasible Capital Improvement Element updates to the Florida Department of Community Affairs with sulficient revenues to meet demand at adopted levels of service. The Capital Improvement Element (CIE). along with the Land Development Code (LDC) and Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUlR) are thc implemcnting documents providing thc system of guidelines and standards for managing concurrency. The combination of thesc three documents ensures the County maintains a Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (the Schedule) as a component of the CIE. Levels of service standards (LOSS) for public facilities are established by Policy 1.5 of the CIE. The LOSS for a specific typc of public facility also appears in the corresponding GMP Element or Sub- Elcment. Thirdly, the LOSS are found in the Adequate i'ublic Facilities Requirements section of the LDC. This duplication may be a simple mattcr of unnecessary redundancy, except that the LOSS do not neccssarily appear the samc among them. Any discrepancies should be reconciled and a single location, or less-redundant locations, selccted for these LOSS to appear. The CIE could be formatted to provide the LOS standards, while the Sub-Element entries could elaborate on the figures and the LDC could provide for the administrative procedures - with informational references from one to the others. The County uses the AUIR to consta11lly evaluate levels of service for public facilities. The AUlR incorporates the data and analysis to show the current, committed. and projected demands for wastewater treatmcnt, potablc water supply, transportation, parks and recreation, stormwatcr management and solid waste disposal, along with facilities not subject to concurrency. The AUIR Concurrency Management - 1 summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecasts the capacity of cxisting and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long-range capital facility planning. a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. Improvements needed to enhance or maintain the adoptcd LOS standards arc identificd and tracked in the AUIR. Each AUIR, once approved by the BCC, forms the basis for the preparation of the next annual update and amendment of the CIE Schedule. The County conductcd a Ievcl of scrvice study in early 2007. which included a survey of level of service standards in comparable countics throughout Florida along with an assessment of intemal measures. These findings were used in considering adjustments to LOS standards and ensuring that capacity continues to meet demand. For the purposes of illustration. thc following cxcerpt from 2008 CIE update and amendment IS provided: As adopted in the AUIR, the County has revised certain levels of service standards (LOSS), as follows: . The LOSS for County Regional Park facilities decreased from 2.9412 acres per 1,000 population in FY 07 to 2.9 acres per 1,000 in FY 08; and, the LOSS for County Community Park facilities decreased from 1.2882 acres per 1,000 population in FY 07 to 1.2 acres per 1,000 in FY 08. All Community Park Land and Regional Park Land transactions are being facilitated through interdepartmental transfers exchanging land holdings for park lands, or using another method not involving expenditure of capital funds. One example is the 47 acre Randall Curve interdepartmental transfer in exchange for regional park land at Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park. These transactions represent changes to the value of land holdings only. . The LOSS for County Water facilities decreased from 185 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in FY 07 to 170 gpcd in FY 08 in accordance with the 2008 Water Master Plan, approved by the BCC on June 24, 2008. The LOSS change and projected decrease in population growth reported in the AUIR have led to the existing potable water plants being able to maintain reliability longer without plant expansions or new plant construction. The following changes were made to match the June 11, 2008 population projections and resulting water demands: . NERWTP: Changed new 8.75 MGD plant construction in FY 14 to new 7.5 MGD plant construction in FY 18; Changed 6.0 MGD expansion in FY 23 to FY 26 . SERWTP: Changed new 80 MGD plant construction in FY 17 to new 6.0 MGD plant construction in FY 22 The following changes were made to new potable water plant constructed capacity schedule: . SCRWTP: Changed 8.0 MGD expansion in FY 07 and 4.0 MGD in FY 08 to 12.0 MGD in FY 08 to match new SCRWTP wellfield delivery schedule . NCRWTP: Changed 2.0 MGD high pressure RO expansion in FY 11 to FY 12 to match the 2008 Water Master Plan Concurrency Management - 2 . The LOSS at the North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) decreased from 145 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in FY 07 to 120 gpcd in FY 08 in accordance with the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan, approved by the BCC on June 24, 2008. The LOSS change and projected decrease in population growth reported in the AUIR have led to the existing wastewater treatment plants being able to maintain reliability longer without plant expansions or new plant construction. The following changes were made to match the June 11, 2008 population projections and resulting water demands: * NCWRF: Deleted 6.5 MGD expansion in FY 15 * NEWRF: Changed 4.0 MGD plant construction in FY 15 to FY 18 * SEWRF: Changed 4.0 MGD plant construction in FY 17 to FY 18; Changed 2.0 MGD expansion in FY 22 to FY 24; Deleted 2.0 MGD expansion in FY 26 From the examples above, one can see how adjustments are made to LOSS based on changes in population growth projections, compliance with updated public facility master plans or other factors taken under consideration. Each year the AUIR indicates whether level of service (LOS) deficiencies are projected in the County during the next five-year planning period. Using the example of transportation planning, a Deficiencies Report inventories the roadway links that are currently deficient or are projected to be deficient under the concurrency system within the next five years and the programmed and proposed solutions to solve these deficiencies. The data used to produce the D~ficiencies Report accounts for factors such as background traffic and vested trips. and whether roadways are located in Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) or Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas (TCEA). For purposes of illustration, the Deficiencies Report from each of the three previous years' AUIR [in both table and figure formats] is ineluded with [his evaluation. Projects listed in the AU IR and the CIE Schedule are described in a manner that enables their location in the County to be identified. For purposes of illustration, the CIE Schedule from each of the three previous years' update and amendment is included with this evaluation. The adopted AUIR appears as a Support Document listed by the Capital Improvement Element. The BCC amended the CIE refated to the October 2008 adoption of "Public School Facilities" provisions into the Growth Management Plan. These changes require the County to adopt. by reference, into its Capital Improvement Element, the School District's annually updated financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program in order to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for Public School Facilities. The School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan identifies the financially feasible school facility capacity projects necessary to address existing deficiencies and future needs based on achieving and maintaining adopted LOS standards for schools. The CIE Schedule is supported by a projection of revenues and expenditures to demonstrate that adequate funds arc available. or would be available. in the respective identified funding sources to pay for the improvements - and demonstrating the financial feasibility of the Schedule. The Financial Feasibility section of the Capital Improvement Element states [f]uture development will bear a proportionate ,ost of facility improvements neressitated by growth. Future development's payments mav Take the fimn of but are noT limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility. impaCT fees, dedications of land, provision of public fa,ilities. and future pavments of Concurrency Management - 3 user fees, special assessments and faxes. Based on prior direction from the County Manager's Office and Board of County Commissioncrs' policy, updates to the CIE will be financially feasible documents. In order to maintain financial feasihility the County draws upon revenues derived from numerous sources, including impact fees. grants and reimbursemcnts, developer contributions, gas taxes, revenues carried forward from previous years. revenues transferred from other funds. revenue reserves, bond proceeds. user fces. and CRA and MSTU revenues. It should be noted that Collicr County has provided the DCA with a financially feasihle Capital Improvement Element in each of its annual updates. Departurc from the preparation of a financially feasible CIE could result with major financial ramifications. and potentially place the County in a position where it would have to abandon its five-year financially feasible CIE with the possibility of forcing the County into long-term concurrency management. This would be contrary to existing BCC policy direction. Public participation meetings were held in early 2010 at ditlercnt locations in the County. No public comments were received related to concurrency management. From all factors cvaluated. staff can conclude that the concurrency management system has been etTective in achieving and maintaining the adopted Ievcl of service standards, ensuring that infrastructure capacity is available when needed to support development and that development is paying its fair share toward the cost of improvcments. An assessment regarding the manner preferred to deal with the duplicative appearances of. and discrepancies among. levels of service standards now appearing in multiple County documents should hi" e<,lrri",d nllt \Hltn th,. dl,,(.j..:inn n'''::llltinn in P ^ l!_h'l<':i,d 'IITI,'nd1111'n".: "-.. .....u..,'---''-' ~'.....' .,.u. ""v '-''-''-.....u,' ''''''"U'''''c '" ,_-' .., ,....,"-...... ""''-d.''..'....,.,.... Allachmenfs Concurrency Management - 4 z o in " w > Z o " . o o < o . o o . " Z W . W > o " . ~ ~~ ~~ ~5g , 11..'" "0. 1!j~~ ~>~ wfil;::t "0 ~lfl >" " Z o o o " w o " o ~ 0 w 3 ~ 0 < . 0 0 " ~ - 0 ~ ~ I E ~ u , ! w 00000000 00000000 00000000 ~ ..l8:g8o;;g~gg ::) <OLl"Jr-r-"'~oo o S&~~~ag~* ~ " ~ " z " o 0 o N . > < " ~ 00000000 "'''''ff>8ff>''''8'''' d <5 o 0 w 0 '" g " Z N 5 ~ ~ ~ 00000000 ""W<J>O<llOOlA o 00 ~ ~g ;i ;iDl " z o 0 o N ~ ~ ~ 00000000 "''''''''0'''0''''''' o 0 '" 0 ~ @ a ;i 00000000 I- 8"'...8....8........ z ~ g ~ Ll"J 6~;; ;; ~ ::IE >- '" '" <( II.. '" '" ~ " ~ ~ :Ii ~ ~ 00000000 "'ooooo<no 00000 0 "''''....-00 0 000'00 co "'....0<00 <:> "':''''<-0",-",- '" "" .'HI"I! ;;J; 000000000000000000 ggggg...-.......ggggggggg ~~~~g ~~~~~gg~~ ~~~~N ti~~g~i~g~ ." "'.... "'<n IJl "'....~ 000000000000000000 g<ng"'...."'..."'''''ggggggggg d d dd~dodd~~ o 0 oo~ooO"'r-'" ~ 0 _m~"''''om'''.,. <Xl N ~d~~.,.~drid ~ .... ....~"''''......~~~ 000000000000000000 "''''0.,,''''''''''''....000000000 o 000000000 !;f gg-lli-ggggr!-t OJ Lt>Ol<!l<t><OO",,<OO $; ~~;;;;.:;a~ggg g~g~~~~ggggggggggg o 0 000000000 g ~ ~gg~~g~~~ ~ ~ ~~~;.:;a~gE~ ggggg~ggag~8888~gg O~ 0 ~6~ooo ~~ ~~ g ~$g~gg ~~ o~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~8 1.1> y, "'on 000000000000000000 00~0"'''''''''''''000000l./'>00 00 0 000000 00 ~g g g~~~~g ~~ ~~ ~ M~~~~'" rim WI./'> 1.1> ~"'''''''''' ~~ . z w o " " 0 u Z o w . " " 0 - ~ ~~ go ~ u ~:w ~ ~~~~~~~~~www~ o~~~oc~~oo~~~ou~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~ o - u III g ~ ~ (j 0 '" 0; 3! Q =~*~~~ "'6w ~; g~~~*ffi~ ~I ~~ ~ "o~~~~w~~~x~ ~~uwu c ~ ~ ,0 ~~E~ _~u~~=u_> ' ~~~~uoE_~~O o~ ~ u 2 ~~&5~~~~~~~ ij~~~~~c. ~ ~ ~~~i11!il~~ i;~i;!j81~ ~~~!< ~~~~~~~g~~ 8~~~~~~ ~~~6~~~ ~I~!~ii~~i!j~il~~: ~~~E~~,~ ~~~~~~~~~c~~~ffi~~~w g2e~~~~ ~~5~~~~~rn~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ 8~8~~88o ~&~z~&~E~ 08~~E~~ m~~~m""m,," ;;g85~~g~g ~""""<o~<oii:1<o ocno,""""",_Ln 3;GGJS:6!;E!:g;g;;S 000000<"'><01- <0<0<0<0<000<0'" _0_ := 0 ,_ a 0 ,- woo WID gggg~g~ggg :;;i<.O":"N' ~" 8" <.0<<. ;i <5 e:::e:2 ~, o8;::J b~"~af! ~ ~li~ 1-"'1.1> ~ ggg o g~ g. .0.,..0 >ON g g ~ o o o a " N g"g-~. <:>8g>:e N o"~_"". ~~m'" G:"'~~ ~ '" 8 . 888 6eric 0868 i:::~f:JN o o o '" g ,,; 000 000 ~g~~ ~ o.""-N. iif;;lo;;N o o o ~ ,,; o 8 g ~ 0<:> 0 0 gggg ~ g:gt[,:-f oom~l() [;: ~ ~,:oi~- o o o ci ~ " N ! ~ , ~ , " l < :;~ n u ~~ ~"' ~ ~ C"'E <! E ~ ClI 5 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ag;~ E~~ ~~E," u8-' 3l "'~8!~ ~'-~~ al><_d~~~I-<110 u... '" J'llJ...! ~.Qt 2 i~;;~~~~~E~L.W E(5(!l('l~~~~/p' - ',.,. 0 > lJ..Gffiu~t~dsg ~ ~ Concurrency Management - 5 g ~ ~ u %-g ~~ 00 aiil ~~ , " 70'5 <ll_'!2 ,U c' OC "~ 00 "- o' 2W -;'0 0_ .;;;'" ",iil 00 ~ 0 00 ow o. .0 {i. ~ ~ Co -;2~ ~~~ .EcU -@l~~ 5LE " 0 . - . i 0 .~'~ 0". Z 0" 00 "" o o o ~ ~ o o o ~- ~ o o o o , . w g g o.~ .0 :g 0" e~ r-il IH I I ,,';:: I Inl . - 0 , u" I ,,="' , ~ ~ ~ 1l~~ EoO g~~ 0"0 ~~~ ~ g; r6 ~"" o. . ;;:o~ u" " ~~~ ~~ai ~ ~ ~ o 0 B -g~ _.,,-0 " 0" ~~lij '""'''' ~2~ ,f=~ ~ ~,1! ('l_~~ ~ ~ ~ ':;~.r ~ t~ -5;1il~ ] ~~ w [~ o ~ g Z~ClI " w G ~ ~ o u M. WD :B ~ ~~ .0 . N ~t EE ~ e 0- ~~ u" . 0 1?.2 .:; ~ . ww "~ 055 Zw r--l ~ ~.~ >- ClI_ "" '" '-' >- ~ 0> (j " .Q E ~ a ~ Til g, ~ ~ g ~ {ii ~ -g 8 niB 5 ~ ~ ~ ~~~-5,2 ",.c"j~ >-- rn 0 " ~ 015-58 ~"[~~~ gg~~~ " C\l ClI >- j ~~~s~ g~ ~ ~ 8 ~ $ ~> u ~ 2 ~ K-~ O"'-1:J"''''- ~~~~~ ~l~ ~ ~ ~ ('l ~ ~ ~ m'O:O l:i c HHI,! 8~~~~ ~~Et'E 8~E~~ 0g*~ l~ _._~_~__~.~~E__, o o U z o < Ii , , i ! o ! ~ z o ii5 '" w > z o i= [L o o "" o [L o o U) >- z w '" w > o '" Q. l!i -'M "" >-i:i 0.::0., ""0 ;<. U 0 u.N t:O(/) lOW'" ::::...1<1': ;(5~ ww-' :r"" UO U)'!! >-u. >- z => o u '" w :J -' o u co o '" N m ID n ro >- m C ID E ~ o "- E ]ij "- m o '0 ID -S u ~ " en 0 0 0 >- * * * Z -' => "" 0 >- '" 0 '" >- ~ 0 0 0 * * * >- Z M => 0 0 N '" >- '" u. ~ 0 0 0 if> if> if> >- Z N => ;; 0 N '" >- '" u. ~ 0 0 0 * * * >- Z ~ => ;; 0 N '" >- '" u. ~ 0 0 0 if> if> if> >- Z 0 => ;; 0 N '" >- '" u. ~ 0 0 0 * * if> >- Z m ::> 0 0 0 N '" >- '" u. ~ U) Z W 0 >- i= 0 ~ ~ Z 0 0 U 0 0 ::> w 0 0 De -' " " >- => C C U) 0 0 0 Z W 0 0 0 :r 0 u U) U) >- U w ~ >- 9 " Q: w 2 ~ z 0 ~ 0 De u i= Q. 0 ~ m D '" -' 0 w ~ ro De rn -' u [L ~ w q rn ~ De [L 0 ~ ~'" 0 0 z ~ 25 ?~ "" '" ~b '" " ID De 0 '" ~ '" Q. " ;; N 0 W 0 0 u 0 0 co co ~g~~ -' "" >- o >- ~~~~ M ;; N >- U. 0000 *** N ;; N >- U. ~~~.;; :; N >- U. ~g~~ o o N >- U. ~~~~ rn o o N >- U. ID o 00 o C ~ ID ID E '" ID "" !5 0" o E"'O -l "";;; Q) S <C Wn:::LL I- ID _ 0 LL 00(1) I- t5cww ro <tI c::J Et5~ ~ - , , > "'u. W LL '-'0 cr rn c -X gs Qi ro (I) " ~~ ID ~ >- (0 E . ~ ~{j Q !; S t5:!2'<- ro 0 ~ >. ~ ~ 5- C ~ c ro 0 - (tl":: Ul ~-;'o~ ('0 C (j) is --l 6l ~ 0 ~~:g-c .~ -C C "'0 Q f..) W C x ~ m rn Q.l x- ClIl(])O ~~ ~ ~ &?~~m m 0 > ~ .':;; ~ ~ ~~O~ o ID 0 j E -0 gj -t ~ g g' rn Cl.(l) rn CL~E-5 ~wwC' ~ ~ E 3l E .!.: C ~ E OJ rn Cl- 8 6 ~ ~ E r.f) C 4: -0 :J g OJ 0 U ill ~ vi ~ DO ~~~g ID 2 ~ ~ '" ID o 0 C _ E a; ~ .g1 :J :- c Cl...D 2:' ID ro E ~u w ~ ~ '0 ~ ~ :2 il:l iJ) W >.:::Jc"'" ~ al (l) ro ~ {3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 c .- c Q.) o ~ m ~ U '0:2 :::J ~ ~ CJ' ~ ''i'"'~ C (l) o "'0 ~ E ~ f6 13 ~ CI: ~ is ~ ai20-g~ li ru (I) 7i.i ~ o ill -E u ~f;o-o~ L.{g "" ~ m m til @ (l) 0.-5 i:' >'0 ~ ~ C";;: c 0.2 (!) <D III C ill m:O ~ ~ -0 r.f) Vi-o -,- 5> c :E ru 00 <l) '<- - U c. E ~ ['3 w~~~~ b 11 CL ~ ~ Z Ii: E,~-E o m ;;; > en ~ w (3 ~ t5 ~ ID 90 o il 5 ~ x ~ (f) W m > m ~ ID 0 >0 E ~ D 2: ~o :> (f) E K fi5 fi ~ E > (l) ;: (/) '- (f) >. o ID U Ql OJ C LL m 2: o if! :s ill c ~ !::! Q) 0 mE u 2: ~ E o ID CL~ E 0 - 0 }!j~ ~~ 0.2 o~ o ID 0 -s U ala ~ 0 u 0 "'D E] '0 ~ c: ~ 2) u f " (ei " o o o ro o ~ g o 3- " o 3: ~ i ~ u " '" w ~ w " rn ~ " Q o ~ ro 0' o w o f ~ Go ~ ~ o o , ~ ConClIrrenc) Management - 6 z a '" '" w > z a >= 0- a o 0: o 0- o o 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 o ~ ~ >- 0 0 ~ o~~ Z ~ 0 0 0; 000> => 0 0 ~ o ~ ~ 0: ~ a, ~ ~ ~ m 0 >- ~ 0 1.I;J-~tAoa5 " 0 ;:I; ~ 0: >- ~ 0 0 0 000 >- 8 8 8 o~~ o~o Z ~ 0 0 8. c3,....-r"-." => 0 0 0 0 0 N ;;; ~ N r-.... Cl " " ~tR-U},J', 0: )0 ~ ~ '" ~ 0 0 0 0 m m f- a 0 0 ~~ M 0 0 0 ~~ Z N 0 0 a ~~ => 0 0 0 0 0 ;;; N ~ m;;- " N o;~ )0 ~ 0: '" ~ 0 0 0 om m >- 0 0 0 ~M M 0 0 0 00 z a a a cici => 0 0 0 0 N N 0 ;;; N ~ ~ N " N 0; ~ tfl~- 0: )0 ~ '" ~ 0 0 0 aNN >- 0 0 0 ~ ~ a 0 0 0 01.01. Z ., a a a NN => 0 0 0 a 0 ;;; ~ ~ ~~ " N <D oJ ~o; 0: )0 ~ ~ '" ~ 0 0 0 000 >- 0 0 0 ~o 0 0 0 a ~m Z m a a 0; N..---" => 0 0 0 a ~m a 0 ;:I; ~ M, ~N " N " Wo; 0: )0 W ;;; '" ~ 0 '" Z M 0 "' " '" " 0 " c5 => M <3 0 '" ~ m M <3 '; >- m '" 0 m 0 Z 0 ",. 0 0 " " <3 ~ 0 '" ~ 0: f- a f- f- f- ~o So' w " o ~ Ul ma ~ . '" '" 0 C 0- >- '" 0 f- " 0- Ul Z ~ 0 6. w a :;; '" > E w 0- ci' "' Cl >- c 0: Z 0 " z w l' ~ 0: " 0 E :i Ul SJ, I~ 0 '" " ~ cu; w 0: ;, ~.g: f- Z 0- 0: 0: llll~ * " " E 0 (I: ~::2: :;; '" u <t: 2!> '" Ul ill a >- ill " ." >- 0: "' ~ Clo '" 5: ~ " " ~ ;; ;;; 0 '" Ul 0 a '" w 0 0 on c- f- a 0 '" '" >- z Ul " Ul > o '" "- 0; ~~ f-O ii:~ . c( ~ <cuo = u. N >-0'" mwfY T'...J;<;'; ><5> UlUl~ ",0: ~~ )0'" >- z => a " '" Ul ::; ~ a " ~ '" "' N . ill :0 . c- -i" ill E ill > o 6. E Jij Q. . o '0 ill "" u l' o '" 00 000 o~ ~~w 0 00 ~oO aim 0:11 00 ~ m >-0 roeD a~ M >-~ ~ . 00 000 O~ tAotl3ill 0 M a r-:r-: ;; 0 mm NO. ~~ 1'-"0) ~ - 00 om m O~ ~M M N 0 ~~ a a5a5 ~o gq aiD )oN '"~ ~~ ~ - 00 omm o~ ~M M 0 00 ~g CO N N ~ 0, NN )oN roc '"~ ~~ , 8" aNN ~o a 0 ('!,N. 00 NN ~o ~ 0_ ~~ )oN "':0) '"~ ~ - 00 000 O~ ~a1.~_ 0 gci ~~ 00 NN )oN r--"r.r'; '" ~~ - E CO c X ill f- ill " > ill '" " 6 E 0 :;; - . ill :;: C ill . I~ c ill " E ill ~ > ill " U ill D I~ EE c ~ &' ~ 0: E 0 C- o a - 0 E e >- oo'" ~~ E . w 0 c CO " ill 0 . z Cl" w d:.~ Ii > w ClO 0 '" :e' w o I"~ ~ ~~ w - -- (ll U :>, c;: <\l 0 c OE~-o' '>- 0] ~ !:; ~ g' ~ ~ g :Q c;: <Il "'0 0 ;;. (ll ::J Q) U e ~ :i5 -5 E ~ ~ ~ (/) 2 <ll C '"-- <ll '- ell WL Ol ::l '- > - c Ql:S~o..Q u.. ~ c c m E8~~~ 2 <ll (ll 0)::; ~:E lii 6 ~ ~ ~ 0:5 8 Q) '- Q) >< -0 E ~ [;> iii c:: Q) _ ::J '" 0 g> g g tiJ -0 ffi ~ ~ ~] z ~ ~.2 1'] g~ ~] 8 Q)E'O~- ~ ~ 21) al g 2 _~ a 'e- o CL-o '" Cl ~.s.g;~~ ~ !Ii (II Ql f':' 'i"'~:ElLg; S! ,~ ~..,.j (I) ~15~~~ "O-'!"(ii:J; g: .s.-62~~ .g~~gc (ll 0 rn '" '" ~ ~g ;;; ~ ..c E (ll e E >,- S ::>;;;;; ~ '0 ';'; g ~ 8~~~~ Q.; -g E g: 1'] '5 ~ "5 ~ ~ o :J -0] E .2 E ro g: W ai OJ u 0 b~~'gaE. Z=(J)"'O~ . ~ w U ~ i' c o < o o ill . N I ~ > o o . " @ ~ ! o I I ~ " Concurrency Management - 7 z o iJi " w > z o " ~ o o < o ~ o o - " z w . w > o " ~ ~ "c <- 5:~ ~l38 . ,,-'" "0" 1iiwiY :c::::!i7i ~ffi~ .' UU -" >" " z o o u " w o " o u ~ 0 ~ N ~ - 0 " ~ 0 1 ~ j5, 0 " it ~ " u w " " 0 < j . w " ~ . < " 0 ~ " z o o . < ~ 000000 000000 ci66cicici OOOOLn'<t ...J<Ooooo", <cir-.i"':"':"':m 1--...............- o~ ~ " " z o o . < ~ 0000000 ....0........000 o '" 00 o cicici '" "'<O~ ~ ,7;~~ ~ ~~ ~ C N ~ " z o o . < ~ 0000000 0"''''....000 N ~ 0.0.0. o 000 00 0..-,0> NO <pmm > '" _-M u....... "".... " Z o o . < ~ 0000000 0............00'" o 000 ci cicici 08 ;g;:.r;f5l Net? M"""" 1::.... ....... " Z o o . < ~ 0000000 ""....00000 00000 00000 00000 DomNO> ...;:;;'....ii.... c C N ~ " Z o o . < ~ 0000000 0............000 o 000 aaa .1.~:;; ~ .0 c:li ~ z o " u o " " - z o u - w " o w Zoo ~ NN~~ ::J "" N ," o ~ ~ '" u - " u w " > 0- " ~ 0 " ~ g~ "- DO .:, "'- ~ .5 3i ti rS ~ B 1\1 ~ ~:!'<~6"- ~~&:~TI~ & S : &: e ~ [/J:::;:.c~Ci.-Jg~ ~~~~~&-~ o:o:;:2E-""06U I~:i~&g~ "-CL"-IJ. gEo> ~~~~~gE IX cr:: rr: cr:: '" - '" () w () u "", Q) ZZZUlWa::O o < 6 -~8:;'O ~ 0 "', 0 m 021- 0...0.... o 0 gi ~ m ~ "'1;1 N ~ 000 0....0... o 0 ci ci . W M ~ :;i o 0 ~~o o o w w :i 00000000 ~~~~ ~~~~r'F . ......... m <ci ::i. OOOOOOO'lfll'i 0""0.... .... '" o 0 0 o ci ci. . <0 '" "T ~ ;i a 0000 0 0 0....0...,..........0 o 0 0 o 0 ci ~ ~ ~ . ~ OOOOOOO'lfll'i 0....0...............0 0_ 0 '" o 0 ci - - ~ '" i o " " 1 o ,~ <:: ", 1 0 o : - ~ ] ~ OJ ~ o i?; '" <:( ~~~!~~~~~i (l)g ",0 E_S3':~ ,<8'" "'~ ~~::z~L~ ?:., :U(/J(/!~~~ Ul 0 UJ ~ ",', cJ ~~rr: g::z::z5iIJ> 5:mrr:CC---'UlUl5:cr o N w U ~ II'! ~ ~ ~ <> ~c~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ "'-;:-0'" 1 ': ~ ':: ~j C 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "".;5: ~ .: c;:; " , 3 , ,,::. ~ : :? ~ [ ,0; ~ f' 3 _J) u z e " o < ~ " ~: ;;c- ~ t ~ '~ ~ ~ o , ,. ,. ~ ~ ;j co ?{90 ,- ~ ~, ~ ~ ( ~~ ~!~~ c~ ~ ; ~ ","'0 i,() ~-S " '-,n'/J ~ " t ~ ~' ~ ~ :0 L (f, ~' ffi ;" r ~ ~ 8 , "8 ~ , ( ollcurrenc)' Management - 8 z o OJ '" w > z o " a. o o '" o a. o o 00 000 00 000 >- 00 000 Z -' ..0'; C'J'Nc-? ::> '" ro_ ~ _ N 0 ~ '" ~~'" >- ~'" ""<")"0 ,. 0 '" >- ~ Eftfhr; ~ 000 Ie; ~~ 0 >- 0 Z M N ::> '" ;; 0 N ~ ,. >- '" u. ~ >- ~~~ !:ii z ~ ::> 0 '" N ,. >- '" u. ~ ~~ Oifi' 0 >- z - ::> ~ 0 '" N ,. >- '" u. ~ >- ~~ g~ g Z '" C'\I- N ::> 0 '" ~ ~ N ,. >- '" '" '" u. ~ ~ ~ 00 ~~ g >- 00 00 Z '" ..0"1"" ci ::> '" '" ro~ '" 0 N~'" O. ,. >-tflM' ~ '" u. ~ ~ ~ Z ., w Q >- '" 0 >- Z 0 <.> "'" ::> w OM '" -' '?': M M >- ::> ~N NN ., 0 Z W 0 0 :J: N <.> <.> ., N "" ~ ^ ., m ~ ^ro w ~::: '" >- ~Fai 0 a.- m Z ' 0 0 M '" :!! OJ 0 c c c c .Q .9 .Q Q uti 13 u >- 2 2 2 2 <.> "iil1il "^ w c c c c . o 0 ~~ 0 00 " ww :'l~ a. 00 '5'5 ~~ ., c c c c >- . . . ro -'-' -' <.> ~ ~ ~~ w cc " c . 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 8k3 " 00 a. w >- ., '" " 00 &1~ ;: w """ 0 c:; >->- >- :0 0 ., ., >- z w ,. w > o " a. ;!! -'M ~;; Q:N ",0, ;<. <.> 8 u.N >-ow ii__ w ~ .Jw xi5>- Ww-' [5l5 .,'!2 >-u. >- z => o <.> '" w :0 -' o <.> ro o oJ, N ^ m :0 . >- ^ " m E m > o 1i f " " . o '0 m "'3 TI l' u w 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' '" '" '" N N >- "'. '" 00 0 >-- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N N " ;; ;; N '" '" >- ~ u. 0 0 ~ " 0 N >- U. 0 0 ~ " N >- U. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " N. N N ~. ~ >- M '" U. ~~ - 0 0 0 0 '" a. 0 0 '" ci 0 '" '" N a. o. >- ~ ~ u. ~~ - ^ m m rn c ,,~ Q- - c ro '" o ~ & ~ {l "6 :J W E ;:: u -g :; 2 o(j)w:;-- ~~ g;~~ u 0 ..c ~ g >- E~~~~~ -E1E~8; ~~~5~;= ~~2~~1..L. ~':l::S:~~~ rn2.ELLS,;,: :2 S: 0 ~ ~ [5 %Lt;S:,STI ~ ~ .~~ ,~.~ ..c 2 (J)....J U c ~~m~~.8 4:rn1$l::B"rE 05)8~rn~ 2- -g c 5 [OJ C rn ~ tl _~ c WucroU~ E.!!! co ~ Ll '5 W ::l 0- ceO" ~ 1l ~ 8 m f!! ~{j~>,~o Ol <l) "0 ro <l) C .S .IE ~ <ri ~ .9 ~ _5 Z.2 ~'-g D.. t5 5 OJ ;> 6 HUH 1~O~3$ o~~.2:'l1iiil _"'O"O<;:=w ~ C C :J CD ... C (\) rn 0 u (Il ~=...JO"'O('f) ~ !:!: .2:' Qj ~ ,.... d: ~ g '5 '~.G:.. I . ~uu ,~BJ ;; w c:; li-~ Iii O:JQ}__ Q. g ~.i!S is '" 0 C <ll '" ~ () m e: u; ~~o~8 u:::.:;::: B ;::-ts o ... 0 <l) Eti5-e Q) rn <Il-g 0- ~~ ~ -g ~ U) g g e ~ c (l) ;> 0.. g; OJ Co e '" <I) ~2a:i~g; g g 7ii,~ C cEgl.Lg; ro<ll"'D .$ :2 > Cl.l "0 '- ~~~~~ CErrnQ,l <1)-_(1)_ ~ 2'~ '- ~ <.).- OJ '0 _ [5 g:e ~ 'ill o ~ ~ Q) ~ mo22m <J.) <J.) >,::l rJ) 6~ ~ 53 ~ E ~~~~~lJj ttl U) C Gl ;> G -g ,iE ~ 5i ~>, g.~::;E ~ ~~~~g~ rJ) > C ,", n. u 1~]-g(38 >, C "CI..... c~El?oE ::l::l2~~OJ o 0 rJ) .._ :::i ~ :::J)~a3 ~ ~ ~ c ::; -D..Q ""6 -<: <J.) 0 U) III U ~ ~ ~ l?-5 OJ OJ;:l -_~ ~~~a;o~ ~S~~28 " . ~ w o . ~ z " " o < . o o " o . ~ " o a o o o ~ ~ > o ~ " t . ~ t % ! 1 ~ " Concurrency Management - 9 z o W ~ w > z o ~ ~ o o ~ U ~ U U w ~ z w ~ w > o ~ ~ ~ :ct;'? ~o ii:":l : <tg: ~Uo : ..... N ~OW iiiwO::: ::;::....l:'!; x 5):: l1J w..J r< UU w~ >~ ~ z ~ o u ~ w OJ " o u ~ w ~ ill ~ ~ m ~ W ~ ~ u w 0 <3 j ~ . " ~ w ~ 0 ~ , . u w 'S ~ W ill ~ ~ . " w w . w w ~ z ~ o ~ < ~ 0000000 g 0000000 0 cic:ioocicici ci <i!;;_:g.~~~t;.~ ;;; b;:~~....ih~g ~ 1-....t17 ........ = ~ z ~ o ~ < ~ DDODogg ....000000 DODD . . . . _ .00 gg~~::;:b m 0 NO, . 0N.....~.~~ ~~ ~ M " N > ~ ~ Z ~ o ~ < ~ ~gggggggg DODCO.D.D.D - - . -0000" ODDD"'D~'<I" ::g: ';!. iG ~ N. D. <D. N. ci..........,:Yi-~~~ ~ N " N > ~ ~ Z ~ o ~ < ~ DDDooDoog ggggg8.8.8.o ....OODDDg~gci ~:::~;:;\(l~M",,":;;'~_ N - -....U>....~ '" I{) 1::~:h ....tIt "" ~ Z ~ o ~ < ~ g~~g~gggg ~- ;; ~cici~- O~ ~ w=;ffi~b :;;:'" .... :;i~"";e- >~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ o ~ < ~ DOOOOgggg 8....-8""0.0_0.0 . - '" 0 0 g g:~ ~ ~~_g.<t) ~.--- if> :h:;;~N >~ w ~ z Q " ~ ~ ~ w z o u w w ~ o M ("T) ~) ~~~g~~ ~ 0 ~gDCJ6: W N N N ,'" r u w ~ u w <3 ~ ~ w ~ o ~ tJ tJ ~ ~ ~ aJ W OJ <lJ ~ :5 e 3 g ~jj o~ ~ ~ ~~ ~! ffi <( '" E 0<'\ nl O1i ::t: B(?--t.:lCi:1!~s: :ii~g~E~&;~ <l.l g ~ OJ]j 0<'\ U ~ _g~~~~~]i~s: ~~~~~Q~~a:: o:::a::OJ~a::~OtW ~6~~~:::~ ZZOIfJZWIYOlfJ ~ o o Q if) r-- ~ co .. 0 0 0 0 C) !!:!~~1Il~0> U~~f-i?~ 000000000 000............000 000 000 ~~~~ ~~~ 1-",.0"" 0"""":- ~;1.... a * N N o o o 0; o '" -- w " N ~ 000000000 0....0............000 o 0 000 M ci ci cici ci ~ ~.h ;Z:?;;?; c: ~ g~~ 000000000 0ff>0ff><F.t<h000 o 0 000 "'l ci <5 cicici ~:g * :SiD ~ ,...;: u:i~O ~ c:;;; ff>""-~ -- 000000000 g""-gtf:\""-tf:\gg 80 ci ci cicio ~~ ~ ~r::~ 01 ",""-<nO >- "" !/} ~ ~ ~ 000000000 o <f70 ff><h<hOO 0 o 0 000 ci ci cicici OM m '" (0 r-- o "'l ~ (j] O"J 0 "'l:;i = :;2- ~ ~ ~ -- m ~ > ~ 000000000 ....00<f7ff>.....000 00 000 gg- ~~~ ",-'" '<j- 0 ~ ~ g;;~ ~ -- ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ := Q ~ om_ ~ "" <IJ 0 ~] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~] ~ ~~~~ c. (lJ (lJ (.0 ED c: ~ ~~ ~ lJ.. ~ ~ Q E G :; ~ * ~ ~ "" ~ (lJ ~ (/):;,::J 0- ~8~C~ IHH ~~~~2 ~~~i~ 0<::,.c [f) , Q 0 cr, <:: ~,*~~~ ;~~~~ ~ ]j ]l g) g ~g~~'~ ~~~~~ 2~? b ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ Vi G (/):is i!J 8 ~~~l~'~ {' 0 >-, [ Ql Oi u l:! ~ g ~ ::J ~~l~~ , ~ ~ g ~ .; '" " ~ " , ill Ci ill b Z ill C " " C g -g c. " , ill - ~ c m L 5j ~ ~ Oi ~ ~ '" C <= ~ <IJ"~, ~i@ o '2<1:< c: C( ::; ~ 3 *-o~ulJ..~g (l)5~g_a..U~ m<lJmf,~~~--' ~~C(~~~0l~~ ~~.:~~E~a:2 ~~~~3di~~~ S: ,% 8 (~if' U -,' C( iE ~_C(,")i?g(3~~ {l)rnC(lI!iIJ--,{I)a:::o:: w ill ~ o 8 ''J g, ] 3 ~ Concurrency Management - 10 EXHIBIT "A" COlliER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COST AND REVENUE SUMMARY TABLE FISCAL YEARS 2009-2013 The table below Itemizes me types of public facilities and the sources of revenue_ The "Revenue Amount" column contains the 5-Year amount of facility revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses versus revenues for Bach type of public facility, All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal The subtotal deficit is tI1esource of additional rsvenueutilized by Collier County to fund the deficit in order 10 maintam t!1e levels of service standards as referenced in the Capital Improvement Element. Prelects ROAD PROJECTS RevenueSourclls Expenditure Revenue Amount Total Revenues IF - Impact Fees! COA Revenue GA - Gas Tax Revenue GR - Grants I Reimbursements CF. CarryForward TR. Transfers GF - General Fund DC _ Developer Contribution Agreements I Advanced Reimbursements LOC - Short Term Loan Commercial Paper RR- Revenue Reserve $147,000,000 $104,588,000 $32,757,000 $34.552,000 '0 $119.509.000 $0 $50,000,000 -$3,068,000 $485,338,000 less Expenditures $485,338,000 B3!snce $485,338000 '0 POTABLE WATER PROJECTS O~cr.:Jti~g Rc~cr,lc Rcvc~:;c>:; $19,120,000 '0 $550,000 $0 $0 '0 $0 $21.520,000 M,650,000 $45,840,000 $45,840.000 $45,840,000 Balance '0 $4~,500,000 $5,340,000 orA''',''',,, '0 $0 $0 $30,230,000 $5,820_000 $87,310,000 $87,310,000 $87,310,000 Balance $0 Revenues: WIF - Water System Development Fees/Impact Fees B1 -Series 2006 Bonds RR - Operating Reserve Revenues B3-Series 2010 Bonds LOC - Commercial Paper 1 SRF5-SRFLoan 5 SRF6. SRFLoan 6 W CA. Water Capital Account REV-RaleRevenue Less Expenditures SEWER + WASTEWATER PROJECTS Revenues: SIF Wastewaler System Development Fees/lmpflr.! Fe,,:; B1 -Series 2006 BOrlds B3- Series 2D10 Bonds SRF -State Revolving Fund Loans LOC Commercial Paper, Additionai Ser\ior Lien SeA - Waslewater Capital Account. Transfers REV RaleRevenue Less Expendilures SOUD WASTE PROJECTS RevenlJes: LTF- Landfill Tipping Fees $10,923,000 $10,923,000 $10.923,000 $10,923,000 Bslance '0 $n $0 $0 $0 '" " Bfllance $0 $10,200,000 $0 $0 $38,769,680 $48,969.680 $48,969,680 $48,969,680 Blllallce $0 TOTAL REVENUE $678,380,680 SOURCES $678.380,680 LessE:xpen(htures PARK & RECREATION PROJECTS RewmlJe!> IF-Impact Fees GR. Grants I Reimbursements GF - General Fund Less Ex>,end':ure,; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS Revenues GR Grants! Reimbursements CF CarryForward RR Operatin9 Reserve RewHlues GF- General Fund Less Expenditures TOTAL PROJECTS C-\lnetpub\W\lWIroot\uploadslmarciakAnd:lll@rollo.".gov,net\200901051112%1\16 Dee oe A[)P-I N Ofl.B elE tabfe~ (oJ..-13) CIE-23 Concurrency Management - I 1 z o , " w > z o " " o o < u ~ u ~ - < ! 0 " ! < ~ " . ~ i , , " , ~ U Q . 0 ! @ ~ :i~ o ~- ~ ~~ - ~,,~~ ~ ~g It ~~ " @g"""@ g~ ~ gli .n - - il o ~ ~ "@@@ @@@"@ ~.~O~..'" .: "'.... ol'\ Na> '" """ _ 0>_ ... ::!:l!O'!~;;j;;R '!!" ~~.. ... ... ~ ""@il """il"o g g il"@@@~@H"~ ggg~~&~ ~ 2~~ X ~ - - ~ z . g 2 ~ ~ - " @"il@ "ilil""" g g Zl ~ "@il@@~@@@~" ~ ~~~~;~g " .... ...;;... ... ;; ;;-, ~ z " E ~ ~ t - o . @""" @ ~ ~ z . o 0 o . :! ~ - o . ~~"~ilil @ " "@"@@@@@H"@ g ~Rg~8g~ . a ~~:4 i~i . . @il@" "@ "ilil g @ ~ zi g Zl ,,@,,@@@@@@@,,@ & Ug~g,gg , I ,;;~i ;i"'~ ""- ~ z w . w > o ~ . ". <- ~@ (35 ." ow w" "< ='~ ~~ ~'8 ~" z o 8 . w j o u " z 5 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 08 6 ~~ ~ 1i:~ - ~"@" - ~ :i ;; I t . . z w ,~o g ,... . a: _ ~ ~::!: u. g~ _ou ~~oi~~~ ~ ~ woo (t"ffi lJ (,) tu u ~::: l.L lfJ<::;r;;s~~lE~ g~~;;:t$.n~. ~uc._o__ @@"",,@ g~ g ~~ 'f!- - . ,,@,,@@@@@@@,,@ g 2~~~.ttw.l:<- ~ . .. _ .a~ , ;; ;;~r.l a i! ~ 1 I ! III > , o U ~) ZZ l'5 r::;i:t I- a: ~~~ ooo;:;l",~ ~o~ ~::,:,~3gg a:o~8 ':J~~g:~8 '" a::j, a. a.a.I-~ ' B;5o~1H~~~8;;~ --<a:z_uuuu.._z i I , ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ h~ii ~ ~ "8": j ~ - 0 a> eel <!l _ ~ l; I 'c~ 2' ~ G~i,< ~.~ ~ ~;o:: E ,. ~mj~ uo5~- ~ $~~<g~ f ~f ~~~5~~i~~ ~ ~jij eta>.~: ~lg~ ~Cl~o~Om -n- E tn.tj -c81~2 } o~i~~~g~~~ ~~~~-82~~ ~~ w '" za.~U~~~~m_ Q ;~<Q2~~ ~< E ~~ ~~~~~~m~~~ ~~~~~~~~w ~E ~E~~ ~ffiuEm~IE~j ~~~~t-~~~ e~~~~~m ~~~~~,~fU~ ~~~Ii~N~ E;OO&S~ ~~~;~~~~;~~~~~j:i~~~ ~~~2$2~ rnm ~mwffi=~~= Ern ~ >~m QOB~~~~ 11~~.jl~I~~~IJ ~E~;~ ii~IU:_ ~~8~~B86a~~~~~~~f~~o OB~~E~~ ~@ij":B~~~ <'>",,,,$$~1J;jiB "'O"'01B"'<II-"'Q~C UU~UU~~~ "~;: tlgg @~~~~~~@"~. . ~!i~_ ~.~~ ~_~_ ....F~~.... "'''-'0 ~... '" "...~ "'''' ... ...... ~ 5~n @ ~ @ ~. ~ '" . ~~~!;f ,,- - @~@ @ ~ ~ ~g@~ ~ @ ~ ~';::~ - '" ^ ~@@ ~@@ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~g - - ::?""'''' id @~@ 8~~ @ ~ ~~~ ~~@ '" >- """ ~ , " @@ 8 8@@ ~~ ;;~~ i! .u ~i! NNO , .-0 ::::1li j " , E g ~ , ~ ! ~ < ~ ~ 1 " . , ~ [2 ~ ~ < 1 , ! " i " S III ~ ~ ~" t;~~-e s'll~~ i~~~ ~~!~~ ><" 0 ~ ~ ~a:>-- ~ ~':~~~ ~ ~~B $ f"'~Cl8~~8~'? [J: ~. ,.,' - (,) ~5b;::t1itSz3lf Concurrency Management - 12 @ ~ ~ @ ~. . ~ " '" 8 " N 8 ~ ~I I p ~ :. " E E" o ~ C'.... ~ "5 ; 0; ~ ~ ~ 1 '0 tio; ~ ~ ~ . - - ," ",.co ~, .; ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 0 0 -6~] 00. 25--" ..t;-g '0 =::2 ...-';;0 ~ ~ '" ceo o OE :::; ~ ~ I~H "_0 u '" <= ->0 IH~ oF.2 r ~; u ~'O 5~ j "'''"'''- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1I It > "I j I ~~~~ l ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~~-e ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ .~ ~ ; ~ ~'~ '" -5 ~ .... }'O1'~ ~ t ' co ~ ~ ~ * :. g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f~] ~ i li <= "-"0'" ~ EO ~ e' i l:~ ~ (, J :J: E lo~,!: "''!!'''f' '''' ,,"'0. BiB i~]~ ~ 3;~i~ ~ ~ ~;x ~ l~ 6.3 10: ~]l~i ~ W U ! , j " < , < ii: j 8 g ! ~ , , " " , ! , ~ . < l I ~ ~. co 2 , ~ , l , . , \ Z o Vi II: UJ > Z o e: lL o o '" o o <0 III ... Z W :IE W > o a: lL ~ -'", ~~ <~O :I.L.N "'0'" mwll: Z 5 1"5 Xo>- WW-' 5<3 III'!! >-~ ... Z ::> o o a: w :; -' o o o C o E ~ c . E <i m 8 N W o :0 m ... o C . E . > o a. .s !ii "- m o '5 . "5 '" o ~ o '" 0 0 0 ... '" '" '" Z -' ::> .. 0 ... :IE 0 .. ... '" <il <il <il ... z '" ::> 0; 0 N ~ it '" 0 <il <il '" ... z ::! ::> " 0 N ~ >- ... '" 0 <il 0 '" '" Iii N ::> 0; 0 N :IE >- '" ... '" 0 0 0 '" '" '" Iii ::> " 0 N :; >- .. ... '" 0 0 0 '" '" '" ... Z ;! ::> 0 0 N :i >- ... .. III Z W 0 ... ;: 0 ill 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 ::> w 0 0 a: -' " c ... ::> C "E '" 0 0 0 Z w 0 u 0 r 0 0 III '" ... 0 '" w UJ .., ;::: 0 :J II: "'j lL '" t- 1: w ;: 0 ~ w ::; .., 0 0 0 ~ '" II: '" lL c ill ~~ ... m '" Z ~ c ~ m 0 " -' a:r- ;: lL t 0::' .. .~ m w lL Zr- a: .. g~ 0 S c w E 0 ~' II: E '" ~~ 0 0 0 :1 u II: lLlL III '" .. 0 N II: W 8 .. 0 0- 0 0 0 '" '" o 00 '" "'''' -' ~ .. ~<ill<il~ ~ ~~ u- I ~~ ~IS;~ ~JJ ~ ;~" o;~to 0!1i0f.A- '.0~ ~;'l;, j'.~i :if" qm ~." .,- ~~ O~\o 0 0.'~0 ~ !.jl '~ ~i ~Is;~ '" o N >- ~ N o N >- ~ o N >- ~ o o N >- ~ .J." -;I,-j; ',,!:: -j~~ ",0; :~"t <'c,' :,~\~ + ~'~~ ,-r'- :.-;.,., ,-'-,r ',,," '" ":+i: .;,.., "',~ :~ .{ ;' ; [~... &:'1 > ~;I' !~ ~ LIJ 0-' ..m LU f~;'~ ~ u.." i~ ~ ~ w o .~~ ~ o m 0 -0 Q.~ .-... _ 0 ra- iii 00~ c ~c o c 0 u'6:: ~:g-~~ ~"O g-5 ~ ffi~ ~ no,Oe ffi.~ ~32 -l 0l:::J 0 -""C=J:: _m~ II:IL: c"O a...uall:: . Q. m ~:~15 .Q(fi:?m &rOO":; ..;! oc@o~ "0'::: Em C-..-.c 1'll al.._- -g~g2 <<:IEU~ -IrOOl ~a:l:5c .....Cl.illlJS ~~En >,... .-..... _Q)Wc: ';::"'EE Q) :::J'- 0 Vl E.J::C~ EOlroa. o6g>~ ::5"q ~ <('0 - 0 ..2 C)'!5 w ro ~ (lj I-_~ if) VJ ou1?&j z!!~.:= " " ~ ~ . . ~ w U ~ " N Z ~ ~ o < o o m ~ ~ :i ~ N D u . W " ill " o o N ~ ill " " ~' ~ ru ~ . <. '0 ~ o o ~ " . E ~ ~ < (ll~g U ::J.~ E :; e e -* h~:5~ JJ ~~.~&; c_Effif/)W IDrll->{ij> E6-.6~~~ ~roEg:oE roO ll.!',,:- Q) ffiCi ~~~ a; ~'<'!:!oo(p:Q:: G~ c ~ 5 ~ E c:1? ID c a..(Jl Q) ~QEm(f.l(ij..... 5(f)~'-~E~ g.~~~5,:;;~ 0-5 (lj 2u::"W g ::0:2 6 . ~ ID rllID>'f/)"'Oa:lt:: ~.~gQ)m$a , - lV:::J = c: C ou t:: C a:l Q) 0 !ffia~~~Ll cu55~O>~ -gEO-g ~ K~ g.ftf~~~Eg> ~5o~~!!~ gJ~t:Dfn~.2 .J;: <<l ~ m IDU :;] Z'~o~~o.~ So c: Sc g: ll.! 6 0- ID-!l Q)"3 <..l ~-gm~~~o w:!22 <U OJ.J;: c: ~6ffi2~<7.l.g o o.E~'5 0)_ w~~~~~E 1-52c<1JO$ o o>a.m:5 C 2 zu::J;~~2<..l . ~ n ~ '0 ~ < o ~ ~ '" '" z Z z 5 ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ " 1i ~ 9 " Concurrency Management _ 13 5 iij a: w > ;z o >= "- o " '" u U <D 0 0 8 :;; 0 0 000 - 0 8 ~ '" 000 ... 0 00 N 0 ~o'" % ~ << l:i 88 .c: '" ~~t ::> 0 N ~ .. :Jl ~ -. " "" ~"'M " ... ..... C\I ..,.-64ri ,. 0 M ~~ ~tIt"' '<t .. ... ~ .. :;; 0 0 0 0 0 ggg - ... 0 ~ :;; ~ 8 0 0 N O~~ % ~ 8 g 0 ~ 0 C') 0_- ::> iij 0 N 0 ~~N 0 0 q N o _ ~ ;;; . I>Ittl'l-tltr--- ,. > .1. ;;; ;;; .. ... .. .. 8 0 00 0 0 000 - 0 .... .. :;; 000 ... 0 '" oo~ % M g ~ 0 ;J8'i; ::> Q ~ 0 0 N ;;; N o_~ ,. .; .. ......,.,..: .. > .. .. ... .. :;; 0 0 0 0 0 000 . ... 0 .... .. '" g ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ % N " ,,; '" ~M"': ::> Q 0 ~ ~ NN 0 N ;;; ~ ~ o_~ ,. ~ .. .... . > pi .. ... ~ .. 0 0 00 0 0 8g8 ... 0 0 ~.. .. 0 0 0 0 o"'~ % " << << ri"': ~- ::> '" 0 '" 0 ~ON 0 ;;; N O~ ~ N .; .. ~ . ,. > ~ .. ~ .. ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 ... 0 ;? 0 ~ 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 000 z 0 << Q g " '" <'loa;; ::> Q 0 0 ~ ~ 0_ 0 N ;;; N '" N 0 ON N ,. '" .. 64tflri > ~ ;;; ;;; .. ~ ;;; .. Z '" ~I I~ w 0 ... >= ~ U u :> u "' u => w is " is <r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ::> '" '" '" 0 '" '" Z W - - 0 I U " '" e E 8 " > " <5 Jj w .. E ~ I~ I~ '" i5 g ... c ~ A>- ... "- ~ " u " " " ~ w ~I~ E " 0,0 '" ~~ " " ~ g: E ... "- " ~ ",1-5 "- >- 0 w 1ii e c: 0: z ~ " "- ~ " w 0 -' u " <r " c W "- a: > ~ " >- c ~ I e '" z "- -' ~ z w " ~ '" " "- " " Q . " B w ~ w g a '" a: " " w '" (ij :3 .S'! <D E ~ >- z n.1~ .::: ~ " " '" .. " E " " " ~ ~ -~ ~ . " . " a: g ~ w a: w <J)!~ ~.'E E 0 ... ~ ~ m Qi . >- .. I.J... ....J tJ CD E ~ " w " ~ 0 " " '" Q ;;; ~ 'i a: w ;; 0 0 - 0 u '" 0 ... _0 ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; '" w ... % w " w > o a: "- '!! ~-::. "'0 j[ry ..0 ~~~ ~oU) mwlI 3:..J~ ><5>- ww~ I'" 00 WU> > ~ ... z => o " a: w :; ~ o u . c . E u c " E '" m <5 N . . :c . ... . c ~ ~ "- i j; 5. . " " . -s u ~ u w oo:;;o~o 00 ... 0 00)0 m ....J Ol8g ~t ;:: ~(');; O"t'? o e;;' ~!;? ...~ ~ I I ij c , . >- ~ " " w . u C o " . " ~ E E . E . 0 E 0; ~ <D a; ~ c:~ ~ ~ ~I~rn -' & ~ 6'!1.~ 5 ~ -;;; rf g; E~ 8 <: ~ E lD UJ <tI t: :> C c: => ~J&,-?lDd} '" > OCu..a:a: w <9oa:u a: Clll1Cun.el1cy Management _ 14 ~ w (3 ~---- . . . I .... .c ,_ <'0 - 5- ._~.G I >.:; 11,)0 c 12E~o~ '" Ql ^ .. ::! ~W:~~ I i5 ~ E 1? 0 a. >. ~ eX E <1l 0 Ql <ll <Dc....m- ~ ~ -~:: g U:g~~-; ~8~~5 - <D <>:I Ole:: ~E ~ 5 ~ ~oo~8 ~gw_~o Ea.~"'c ~g @ ~ B .e Q) W ~'5 "0 D :::;: <U <:: 0 '" >-~~;u; g~~~~ ~ ~ II i5_~ ge~a.e 80."'0 '" Q. E <1> ~ '" ....~u:::l::! t~~.r~ ,D-_ ::> ~ 8.~"2:f, .....-~N~ COO.Q;:::C: C)W";:;)<U<!> {i~2 ~ ~ .g~ ~go <uJS_Ei _!!! ~ ~<I) ~ ~ <0 .cE co.... E >._ c: ~"_ .....-::::0;;:; c: 0 <I> <I) <ll is "~~ ~ ~ O""<I)c:<:t\ ~~E~~ 8~E~~ 2E<c~E ~ ci"'s_!:2 2 <D ~~ct~f~ ii . ~ ~ . w 13 > " , ~ . o < u ~ o c , ~ ~ u u ~ Co o ~ ~ " ~ " . " u 8 ~ ! . 1 < . " ~ 8 < :; u " > o o z Z z ~ " > o ~ N , ~ u o 5 00 oc w > 5 ~ ~ o c < o o 00 00 ~ z w ~ w > o ~ ~ ~ "- <- ij:~ , 0( ~ <00 , u..'" ~O" ~~~ .0, W:i:l~ z< 00 00"1 >~ - Z o o o ~ w ~ ~ o o c ~ " ~ < . g N . ~ - . 0 w C " ~ ~ r w 7@ ~ ~ 0 " < . ., ~ " Iii 00 ~ 0 88 8 8 Iz ~UUU; 5: ~ ~;;;"'g ~ 2i oOlt M < ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ M 00 M gggg OOQO 0000 j!;oI'llJ)('} .,.;~~f4 M M ~ Z o o ~ < M llllllUgg ~ gg:2~" N ~.;1~~ l;: ............. ~ Z o o ~ 2000000 ;5........8888 ci 6ci<50 ~8 gg::gg: ~u) 6~ri ... ~........ > M ~ M ~ Z o o ~ < M g~~8g8g Q 000.0 _0 060d g~ 2~~1 >OIJ _........ ~ M ~ Z o o 2 < M 8888888 ~gggg~~~ g Ili..:"'o....<.>> ~ <It........:; M z o ~ o o OC ~ 00 Z o o 00 W ~ ON %0 W NO 0 ...J . ;;;; ::l'0"""" ffi <; ~N I - o L ~ ~ , " n o . o Q ~ ~ ;;;E~ ~j~ ~~ ~.m~ ~% ~~~ ~.~ <II'" "'''' ~ ~ CJ "21) tI).o~ a.2:!i! o E <II i"- ~~Q; ~~() 'fg~~3~~ a.~e:~.~~E ~3:~({) !':?;:p: [1;0:::0::::0"'-" 000., "'., Z2Z0t..Uo::: . i5 .gjMai !!!g<!~ o;::;::::~ ~ oi o o 00 8~_ :li . <5 ~ .. g R 0. gllllll ~ o o o 8 . gl 8~8000~8 g ~ ~ .;; ... o 8 g :" <5 o ". 1 " . E . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ * g ~ a: 1ii 2 ~{'j~-gtf ~.. ii r2 ; ~ OJ oJ"> <D,~ E -8~~~~~~~ ~j~~~~4;a: !"e"'8<=a:a:~~ ~'i '~. {/)L?~~ ~:tC:g~~~~ 0::: ...JUJU) rr ~ w U o 2~~ =6.~ gg ~~.s ~ ,;::;",~1l "E.c"'C: ~'j ~ 8 :; ",!I' ~ ~~i~ ~~1l~ ;~~ : ~~ n_~ 2~~~ alll_~8 "2_'-'-0 ~ ~ -g ~ "-_ N" ~il:.g ~~.':~ "-g;;go E~-~~ *~e'~ J}ii~~ <:0.,::1 '" ~ OJ ~ ~~;~ ","'" ~ '" ~ g~ ~ ~~~~ gg~.:: ~8-c~ 60)J!2! 8~~~ ~",~;j; ~~ g ~ ~~~~ ",_0)0) 3;~~ g.~~~ u E<= ""- ",O)'"E ~ ~J~ ~E ~ g ::im ..0 ~.~~~ ",ue:> 8~~~ "'3~,g ~jlii~~ 0-,;",-<0> 211) ~O ~ ! ~ I . ~ ~ ~ ~ i , ~ 8 ~ " ;; " . . ~ 2 ;; ! I i j . ~ g ~ . , o o . ~ ~ ~ i 9 o Concurrency Management - ] 5 z o i]; 0: w > Z o f" ~ o o << o o <D OOg 00 I- ~q . Z ",0 00 " <<- _N 0 1-'" ..'" rncD :l! O~ ..." 1-" .. I- ~~ ~ Z .. " ;; 0 N " >- < u. .. 00 0 I- ..0 0 Z ~ C> 0 " ;; 6 0 N ;; :l! >- M u. .. .. 00 0 I- .. .. Z N " ;; 0 N :l! >- u. .. ~~ 0 I- .. Z " re 0 " >- < u. .. 8~ 0 I- 0 0 z 00 0 " - ~ 0 0.. .. N . M ~ >-~ u." .. .. "' Z W 0 l- f" 0 " Z " WO~ '" ",-- ,,00 l- NN "' 0 Z W 0 :I: " " "' "'~~ W <<<< if> 1--- -' OwQi i5 ZOO 0 l- I- 0 W 0 0: ~ if> W "' f" I- ;;! " C C 0 W 00 << ~ tin "- 0 I- 00 '" '" " " " << ~ w tilt; "' "' ~ c c 0 W 080 ~ f" <r__ "' ::; Q.Q)Q) is U 00 w .. €'5 '"" u. c c '" -' . . << << -'-' S: "' ;'-0 0 53 ::J ~ "' 00 0 5 00 w w '"" "' ~ "00 !:!:!rom 0 "'""'"" ::; 0 "' "' I- Z W " W > o '" .. .. "''' <- ~~ - < ~ <()o ~ u.. "l I-OW mwa: I~~ ~~:: :I:<< "u "'''' >-"- I- Z " o o '" w ::; -' o " " " . E D C . E << o " " N l.~ . :0 . '"" " . E . > o " E ]j "- . u '0 . o D . " en 88 00 ...Joo <~~ 5~~ I- .. " N >- U. " 0 00 M~~ ~:;:; rMM u." N 0; N >- "- " N >- "- 00 88 OciD o:;;;:'q" N . . [:~~ " . . 0 c "- Q- w c . Z 00 .. .. " 0 .. .. 00 .... c - 0 .~ ~'8~w ~~312 ~ oS 0,..2 oo~ ~ ~~ ~g ~ID~'- c;.c-C ~ m--'" E -"- c . _ 0 <I! ;;. ~ u ~~?;~ <Il~ 1l~ ~?;o~ ~b~~ 3;"&: ai3_.q .f E ~~ iJ ~~ ~:5 ~ ~ ~8-*~ 0::--0<::1::0 c~Q~~ E~~~~ q) ::J 0. C c: g, a: iij 8 ~ ~ tl ~ ID~ z.!:2 iB <Ii-S n:l <.: - Q) >. log c2 (ij 0- ~ ~Lg> ~ ]i~!~ w'iji8=g~ Z;~-,.!L.J 2'5'EE'lQ I :i:~'i.~8 ::1___'-'"0 <l>1..I--~' ~ Q.> ,,:s~ ?i~-'3 1....:;:..000- : ~O() ~ " N W (j . . .- ~ r-~;~QI .,." go; I ."'Q '-' E 2-0 Eig.2!E::::; Ci t: (ij.~.o :::> c '" <Il I ~g<tl~u; ~8 c re 8 u:: (D ~;':-o _5 :i.E'~ ~o g~ 0. i~~"'Q3 (j) a. c ~ ::? E g ~ a~ CD !:lUl<n E~-ol!>Q) lP<IlQ):l:l ~E_~&"~ <ll OV't:) . Q) :E~.g:~-E ge~~~ ~ E'~ ~ ~ 0= w 0::= 5.~:g ~:8 u g-~'~ ~ ;0022<'0 11>- >.::J '" ;t~~g~E E3~~E.ffi m~~~~~ -013:.;:>::: a(l)~ ~ g-g- .g~Ujai=~ (I'J_ :::><d,.!!!::; '" 0 E.o:,? 5. g ~ ~Eia;8 8 ~~ E ~ 0 E i5~*=~.!!! 0.... >'"-U 0> lli2~~1!6 '5 w ~ i5cX ~ o~E"'Ql<1l .. E ~~:5 3 ~~~iiio~ ~ [~ ~ 2 g "____ j w G o ~ " . o < o o m < i B u u ~ o d: ~ . " . ~ o ; Q . < o 1< ~ I I . " ~ 8 <( " < o . > , ~ z Z ~ . ~ ~ ! . , ~ u Concurrenc)- Management - 16 z o in <r w > z Q ~ o o << " " m m 'Z w '" ~ o <r .. 3! ~:! I=@ . ~ s? ,~g 1=000 !e~~ ~5~ ww~ ,,<< ~~ >~ 'Z " o o <r w ~ ~ o " . E . E u c ~ << 8 0 ~ ~ " ;" ~ . 0 " <r . ~ ~ '" . W C ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ "- Z W -" ~ ~ 0; << "- W . i" " <r " w . !< "5 '" u . w ~ ~ ~ 0 ; ~ o ~ ~ ~~~~~$~ ~ ~nU~~g ~ or .. _. . ~~";;:;:l!Ia l:l ~""~ * ;; II "~U.U 08 0 ~~. . . ~ ~~*- 3 'Z " o ~ :! lil > ~ ~ 'Z " o '" << ~ ~~~uu ~:;:~~li!U ~c)~6ii;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ii > ~ 'Z " ~ << ~ "U~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~:;!:;!~~ 2 ,,""'0 c?.,f_"': >- ... -~~"":4 ~ ~ 'Z " o '" << ~ ~n~nu ~~~~~~!l!!:l~ ~;);;if09~m;);~~ > ~ ~ 'Z " o '" << ~ ~ll~~~~@ ~ o~ 8~.~~~~ g* ~o""~"""': >- ;;..,. ~ ~ z o " " " or ~ '" z o o '" w b::~ ~~@" ~ . . 5:g::o wo@ ,,~ " 00 ~ " w ~ o <r .. 00 ~ '" o ~ ~ " w Q; 0 ~ <r o ~ c " Q '" UJ m '0 l- E :p.oP ~ <II III ..c:!;;! U) g ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 22 w '" _ lll~ ~ <{.no!! .....0 <( <pc-a=Cl.-1!<;iW ~5-"'~~&'""~ =<I>~U~a/l()ffi ~"Ca: III a: Em f-- 0~~-~5~~~ ~&~~'~g~~ :;:::~E<ll as(/) ~gc'}J~~~~~ "~~2 ~rn{J)O 0<')<')<') ~~~ ~ll~llllll@~~ ;;'~ ~ U~ b"; ~ .oS; l:l ....... to') miit;;;. N w (; ~ll~lllla~~~ ~~ g ~~~ >-fli'" ~mre ~ ~ ~ ~ll@llllll@@@ ~ g ~ ~U ~lli ~ll~ @ll~llllll~@@ ~ ~ ~ ~U :;i3... "" M~": r'i: to'). ~ * OOOOOOS;?:QO g....8..........,.1:Sc:s:8 -i ~- ~*g ~ ~..., ~~ re ~ ~ ~ ~:>~llll:>8@8 o ~ Iii 88 Iii &... i.:l ~:;; ~ >- en ....~* ~ , . ~ . . . w " ~ z ~ o < u u . . . . ~ g !Ki - - 0 af~ ~ i ~!lg~ EEa>o :g~E:€ .....0 IP_ J;~~~ ~~l! * .~~~ ~ a.wi u> :li'Os ~ ~~ i if~ ': ~ "u' E >-sl ~~g1ii ct~~.~ Eg~()E <pod}_<D ijU.... 0;;:; 0>1 ~~ i;' as-',l;i >- :ii'O En ~ :~:;~oo t: <.> o..ca <P g ~ g:ij-E 0 :;Q>~OO g~~fiiE 3~~~;, m ~: g~ ~~;;>E <II i~~'~3 '" E ~ ",-:EO ~i~!il8 g-'ii'll ~u ~c3~.2g :g~~~.g ~~j~:g g-S <n ~~ O(f);Qe8 ~",,,,;;>- ,~:,s ~ ->2'1Jl l~o:;~e- w~~~ ~ '6-g~*~ Lz.~" > < , , ~ IE " ~ " w " y , i TI is 8 , . , , ~ , . , " , y ~ . o . , o o z z 5 . . , 8 . > , . . J r; -" c :; ~'" 3: n~ u. 'S ~ ~I~~o 00 e '" "'~.:.. ~ ai.gS ~ ~ ~~~ E a:: 3..: Iii Q)",m",u...Ql- ii-gi;-gcll.(1", ~S$d3~]i;;;i..J "'Slro>u!i>;:: i~_@~~~~~ ~"'~"'$~v.;$w :g'~"'~&3f..)~~~ ~UlO(f) . . . . W iUl~ . ' . u. 0 <( > > ~m:fmffi9fA~~ o Concurrency Management - 17 EXHIBIT "A~ COLUER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COST AND REVENUE SlIIlIMARY TABLE FISCAl YEARS 2010-2014 The lable below it8miles the types of public lacililills aoo the sources 01 revenue, Tile 'Revenue Amount' column contains tI1e 5-Year amount 01 facility revenues The right column is a calculation of expanses versus revenues lor each type of public facility. All dellcitG are accumulatDd as a subto1al. The sublatal deFICit is \he source of additional revenue ut1illed b}' Collier County III fund Itle deficit in order to maintain Ih& ieval6 of 6elVie& standards as relerenced in the Capital Improvement Element Projee" RwenIl8 Sour~ ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD PROJECTS Elrpenditure Revenue Amount Tobll Ravllnu&S: IF - Impact Fees I CQA Revenue GA-Gas Tax Aevenue GR - GranlS I Reirntlursllments Cf CarryForward TR-Transfers GF-GeneralFund DC - Dev910per Conhlbution AgrlNlments f Advanced Reimlxlrseml:lnts IN-lnterestRevenu& LOC. Sholl Term Loan Commercial PapElr RR. Revenue Re&eIVlI $67.500.000 $86,898,000 $.5.4,841,000 $27,669,000 $0 $73,495.000 $5.250,000 $10,680,000 $0 -$1,962,000 $324,371,000 LEISS Expenditures $318,407,000 Balance $3111,457,~ $5,914,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS Aevllnues WIF - Waler Systllm D&v81opmanl Fees.llmpacl Fel:ls B1 Series 2006 Bonds RR - Operating ReseNa RElvenu% B3 Serias2010Bonds LOC - Commercial Papar 1 SRF5-SRFLoan5 SRF6-SRF Loan 6 WCA - Water Capital At'''''"ot REV RateRevenulI 59.660.000 $0 $4,140,000 $0 $0 SO $3,000.000 $55.930,000 $41,100,000 5113.830,000 5113,830,000 $113,830.000 Balance $0 $9.660,000 SO $1,2aOooo '0 $0 '0 $91.540.000 $50,a60,00Q 5153,340,000 $153,340.000 $153,340,000 Balance SO Less Expanditufes WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTfM PROJECTS Revenues Slf - Wastewater System Oavelopment Fa(\silmpacl eees B1 Series 2006 Bonds nn-c,:,..fdUll(j R.,;;"'Vtt Rev",,,u,,;; B3-Seri..s2010Bonds SRF Slate Revolv;ngFuodLoans LOC Commercial Paper, Additional 5"l1Ior Llell seA. Wastawater Capital Accounl. 1 ransters REV-Ralerieveru... Lass E~p..ndil.ures SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL fACILITIES PROJECTS Revenues ITF-I_3odlillTipp.ngFaes $(>,820,000 $6,820,000 $6,820,000 $6,820,000 Balar;c8 SO '0 $0 $0 $0 .. - Balance SO $10,000.000 $1,356,900 -$100,000 $32.045.900 $43,304,800 $43.304.800 $43.304,.800 Balance SO TOTAlREVENtllO $635,751,800 SOURCES $641,665,800 Less E.~pl:l"ditures PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES PROJECTS' RevenU8S IF-Impact Faas GR - Grants,l Reimbursements GF Genelal FUnd Less Expenditures STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECTS Revenues GI4 Granls i RSlmbursem"nr" CF -Carryforward RR - Oparating RaseIVe Revenues GF Ganeralfund Less Ooxpl:lnditums TOTAL PROJECTS G.',Corn"'a~"ns,ve\CCiMP PLANNIr>G 8M'" DA1A',COOlP Pia~ Am~nlIlTUln1S120W L"",~ f-'elil,on"\CPSP.2009 ~ r-1E\flCC\23 Ma,er, ,n B;':C .\DPTN 2K9CIE labl... i1n.'4)..<Isx CIE -22 Concurrency/ Management - J 8 ~ o .~ & < o o " , . ~ ,J " u , I ~ z w ~ ~ . ~ " j o w o w z ~ ~ z o o o . w j o o UUPU~ ~ ~~ii~ ~~~ ~ o;t~ ::ig "'l:l . ~ z , 6 ' ~ ' gg~Sggg8g ~g888gggg ~ 1:: 0 ~h . ~ ! ~ I , ggSgSgggg o. ~. gggS:ggggg II ~::~ . " ~ ~ ~ ! gU~.'U' 00.";"'; "'-0 g51l:~ ;8 ;j,~"'cO "'::t g~ "':~ ~L a;o g:_ o "q .g ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~:Jt>~<:Hio_l': "" ",-~.,J<e! i! '" ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~..~.~~......~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ig~g!~ ~ ~~ !g~ggg~~~g ~"'''' ~~"'~'" 5 ~'" ~X"'~~"'~"'~~ ~ .....~........~......~.~~~~~~~~ ~ R 9 g~gg~ggm : ~ :;'~~$~:g:;.~ '" ~ '" "'.. '" ..:S .gg.'~.g...8'.gg.gg.g~.~88~8g~g ~ N ~ 0 0 o_6o~oo~ ~ ~ ~ 8 g ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ",;;;; ~ ~t; ~ ;;~ ;;; s:gg~~g~gggg~g88gggggg8ggggggggg ~~ g ~ ~8 g ~ ~~~~~~ "'~; g g~ g g ~"'g"'~~ 8gggggggggSg888gggggggSg8g8g8g8 8" g ~-g g g8~8.@":;;. ~ a ~.~ 2 ~$g;;;;~i 88~"'.g8.'8.g""'..~g'8gg~8g~ ~~~ ~~ 6 0 6~ ~gg~gig NOlv _0> g 8 ~o ~M~~~"'~ ~~~ i~ g g ~i ~~"'$"'~~ g :3~:3 ~ ,'"'"" ~_ t>_9~co:-~gg ~o::~2I.,,"~c;cici ~.~~~0rt<2~S. 3~~~~~~~~ ~ " g ~ " . ~ ~~ ;i c:-ci . s. s. g:.;;;:;3 '" ~ *~~~~~~g*~~~8 , ~ ~ , " :; ~ <tl ([ ~ ~i~] ~,,~ ~ ~ O~O ~<tl "'" ~~ c E ~ Q ,,~~~ ~~ ~([ ~~ ~ ~ 3~ ~~~~~~ 8] ~,,~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~0 ,,~~~ ,J- wo'" ~~~. rn~ ~~~" ~~Q ~~~]] ~ ~~8 oc~&~ ~o ~ t([ - i~wE~Ej~~~ 6tE~!~E~ l~~ ~& ~~ ~ ~U~E~~U ([ ~~~O~rn~o~([ _~~rn~ 0- ~rn~m 8([- N~!Sc2$ ~_~w E~~I~ 2~~~~~ ~if f~J;~~J ;ii~ J~jlw ~j -~~~"O([([E" "([ m'~ 8 c~ rn"G,~ ~~t .~ 02c,~~~ ~~E~ ~E w. "~0([ ~~~~2~ mu ~rn"_g~rn m~~~0i~~~~~o 0~ ~ n~~ ~t~~~~~~~.~ ~~3~8&o~8~~~,,~~~~ ~~~~~ ,,~. ~,,- ~ ~-" " """".~~-~.-~_. -- ~~0j rnZ~!m ~~2~Z~([([([Z0~([~~06e!]$]] if~ii~rni~i~ili~il~~~i~~~~1~ !~~~!j 88~~m8~>~w~m>8~8~6655~ffi~iG~~~~~~~~ ~ o " <l:",<<l<<>~ o um.... "~"3'.ii~','~o"'c,"~o" ~~~~~~$~~~*~@g~&g~$~~~8g , ! - Il ~ -l'l :3 ~.i] ~~~ '<i!,,<( "E ~ -~ -~ ~ ~il~:;:.r ~ ~9" '" (l: -" ~ ~ "ll ~ .,H~~ j[j1'o.lJ ",wO"" ~Ii~~ "''''",g ~UUU'U o Uiin'~ ~. g ~i,E-~-M-,~l-~ ~f >-- "'~r-'''' ...-~. ""'- '" ':if ~UI ~n;! ~ 6),6";" ~ "y(:{{! (;: .., ,. ~;;; g . e8:U~ ~UH 2 o~w_",-..,:: "'''''i:-<\I..:",-, i;: .. .uu. ~ g~ ~~ 2 ~~;~~' sun ~n!:iE ~ g:~uJ.~ u.uu ~~-:-~;;~-,@ "",<if":"';.., '" .. '" '" ''''-1\l '" .~ I i " w j ~ I ~ ~1 i ~ ~'-':r" u: "i ~ > -. ,h 08' ~ l."ni"'~ 5~~~rhH' rE ~J~lL.)1-' ~~~ > -'.";....' :"" ','" . "",' M! u:.~(1l S ~'~ ~g:i < ~ Concurrency Management _ 19 ~ .. , i! if h ~i I' II I Ih h, >.1 ..1 H! ~p U !'~ !fl h; h! - .: h~ ! j ,. $ iltI)~ ~ ;i!~ i f~ i ph " [;>,,- U~E L.L~_.. ~8~~ 111 "-'_ $~H !i~R "'t=-!il-a ~~i] > >. ~~ :s~ !Iii ~:; ~~ """'E,l'i [J"- i ;15! ~ "..!l!"~ iW "''''15: 1!~'i:g tih .~~ ~ 1!! :in; Imil Z~.o.s . " ."'"'" " 0 iii Jj~ -~ ~ .~] o .,.. '; ~ ] <: ~ l'! ~ ~ ~g~~".3" -i5 ~ L:; <:: r: (Jl-- "7i~&~~~~ u " "(j) Cl 0.. " <{ a:...J--'--'O . " " 1 , ~ ~ " ~ ~ . o ~ ~ ~ I . i < ~ " ~ ~ ! , ~ , ! ! < " < . o l .. ~ o o m ~ rn 0 0 c g. u < 0 " < 0 0 . ~ z w ~ w > o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ t:~ o ~ t3 ~Oo . ....'" I-OW mwIT :i:l:-5 X~r W~;:;! 130 Ul~ ," ~ Z o o o ~ w o ~ o o , o ~ " o . ~ , I o ~ m ~ G a . ~ w 8. 0 g 0 0 8. 0 g 0 0 g g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 8. ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 z o. 0 o. 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 8. ~ 8. 8. >G 0 8 8. 8. ~ g 8. ~ g ~ g ~ g 0 ~ 0 . 0 ~ m ~~ 0 0 0 :;; ~ ~ N ;;; ;;; w ~ cC ;;; W ;;; ~ :;l ~ ;), ., ;j, ~ ill < ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~ 0 "' 0 "' "' 8 ~ ~ "' 0 0 "' " 0 0 " 8 0 8. 8 0 " 8. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8. 8 0 0 0 0 . f;/ 0 f;/ 0 0 cC ;;; ;j, ;;; '" ~ . ;;; ;;; ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 8 0 0 0 8. ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ z g 0 0 g 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 ;;; N 0 "' w ;;; "~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8. 0 0 0 0 0 0 8. 0 ~ g ~ '" ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ g- g- g i2 8 ~ 0 0 8 z 0 ;: 0 0 0 :;i ;;; f;/ ;;; ~ ;;; ,; ~ ~ ~ , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 8 g 0 " 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 g ~ ., g ~ ~ ~ 0 8. ~ 0 0 o. Z 0 0 '" 0 0 g 0 ~ ~ 0 N 'J: ill ij! N 0 0 00 ~ . 0 ~ ;;; ;;; < ~ " 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 :I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 '. 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 '" "' 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 z " g ~ g: g g g ~ 0 N ~ " M 0 ~ '" '" ~ ~ '" . '" tfi < ~ . z " 0 , C> 0 " ~ ,~ " 0 " , , 0 0 , 0 " 8 ,. ~ 0 ,~ 0 0 u 0 0 0 , c 0 U m g; '0 m B g 0 g 0 0 8 m :; 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 oc ~ u . , , z 0 " g , 0 , 0 u , ro , 8 " 0 , " (.~ c' ," , 0 ~ 6 0 " 0 0 6 0 0 co ",", CJ 0 0 0 co , 0 0 a 8 (~ 0 0 0 6 2 2 6 , " 6 0 " " 0 u 0' ,. " "' " 0 "' u ~ "' ill ro " u " I , w ~ "' 2 i " w " ~ " "' :i "' "' . IT , ,y 0 ~ ~ 5 " () , " . 13 0 0 ,;1 " to- - " co ~ 0 ~ "' >: "' ~ IT " f E " j 9 ~ E '" 8 c E ! " " m " , < " " , g "' ~ J , IT ~ C J " .0 ,r ~ "' , ~ "' " " ill " ~ ~') , " " . w ~ 0 ,~ g IT w " ~ " " " " F 1 ~ "' l " 0 "' i D n " !2j . 0 c " 2 j " . "' z "' "' ~ n 01 D " ~ .~ w 8 ~ E ~ TI ~ g I TI i IT }if ~ ~ " 0 IT " is c 0 " m " " w "' " IT ~ , ill W 0 " < ~ " " ill U ~ > > IT IT IT IT I w " '" c~ " " " ill 0 ~ " , cc' x .0 , "J <i ~ 0 u, 2 " x. ~ ~, '" c " ~ " 0 0 ,.J ~ " x ~ ':"1 m D 0 ~ 0 0 8 ~ 00 ~ g g g ~ ~ 0 " c 0 0 0 i? " ~;I '"-> u "' ill W 0 0 0 m C , Concurrency Management. 20 8ggg ~g8gg 00."",:-0_ "-_ f- ~_~:5iO> -@i~@ ~g8gg 2, 'D.'WN_C>. o;:?tSz;~ ~'" " o8~88 ~ g:'; gg" ~ ;2': ~~ 0," ~ c 8800 00 OJ 0,' __0.0, g 8.8 8 g NMU)NO ~ ;i-;t~??-- N~,.' "' " 0000 ~~M88 0.0 0'" "'~. ~~ ~g wa c 0000 _8f1l"gg ~ ~:: 8):'2 J.,<D, C\[CD O<\j .-(") Rl't ~." , " K , ~ d I ];j~o ~ -g-Q~ 0- u'2'-o j~J~~ g,~ ~o ~ ~o ~~ 2. ::;!= Q)(f)L 0 ",5 _ 1JlCL ~1l)jj2~ ~~~;~ 0"''''<.0> c';=;:: '" ~~~m~ ",0.>>-;:-'" ~.E ~ -9 ~ ~~ ~;r,c~ mil! ~~~$~~ gl i ~~t Zl.L E.9 0 (, '" E ~ " w ~ IT " < z ~ w Z " ~ ro ~ c c-;O o o o ?,- ~ x . E!l ",0 ~I 00 u,c Eo ~ -;;;'ii3;:: g;~== 0 ~-~$~ ~g:3 ~ - .. , -.,. 'lrCL W LL(!jC)(I: " ~ , -g '" < u o ~ ~ o o ,~ o o m 13 z " t ~ IT < ill W :L iji ~ E o o ., . ;; .-c; 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ;;; 0 0 ;;; >- 0 0 0 z ci .. ci ci .. ::> . 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ m '" 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ '" ri "":0- " 0 ~ ~ ~~ '" " ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 >- 0 ~ 0 ~ z ~ ci .; ci .; ::> 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 6 ;;; M OM " ~ '" ~- ~- '" ;;; ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 >- 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z ~ ci .; ci .; ::> 0 0 0 0 0 g ;;; 0 ~ ~ " ri ~ri '" . ;;; ;;; .. ~ 0 0 0 00 >- . 0 0 ~ ~O 0 ~ ~ Z ~ ci ci ci ::> 0 m m 0 ;;; '" '" " ~ ci ci '" >- ;;; ;;; .. a 0 0 0 0 0 >- . 0 0 0 ..0 0 '" 0 '" Z g ci '" ci '" ::> . 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ;;; '" " '" " '" ;;; ci '" >- ~ ;;; .. a 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ;;; 0 ~~ >- ~ 0 0 ~ Z ci .; ci .; ::> 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ M 0 M " ~ ,.: N '" '" ~ ~ ~ >- .. a " 0 ~ " w U ~ ~ 0 ~ Z ~ m 0 . 0 ~ 0 ~ ci ci ;:: " 6 " 0 0 ::> 0 0 m <r ~ ~ 0 >- 0 0 '" " 0 0 Z ~ M ID ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 w u z w ~ ~ 0 u ~ u ~ 0 . . " 0. . > E Ci' w c ;; 0 " . 0 ~ E Q " ~ c U5 " . . "- ~ "' E . . . . <r 0 ; '" "' . W . . .. >- . ;; .. '" cL . ;:: ~ (!) <ll " ~ ~ M . ~ 0; 0 ~ 0; w 0; 0 <ll << 0 0 ~ >- e- O- ;;; :;; :;; 0 '" e- v "' 'f '" o "- << " o '" >- Z W " W > o 0; "- " ~ << >-0 irC:J <<~ u8 ~'" 0'" ~~~ ~::;)w UJ~:: :>:"' ~~ >-~ >- z ::> o o 0; w ::; ~ o o ~ o '" '" "' o "' . :0 . e- w 1" . E . > o 0. E .,~ . , "' . ~ u en 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~.... 0 '" ~ ~ ci .;,; .. ~ 0 ~ "' m ~ ~ e- .; -:':0 ~ 0 ;;; ~~ e- 0 0 0 0 '" ci 6 '" '" :; .. '" ~ >- ~ 0 :; '" d> 0 0 '" i:: ~€g ~ oo;c6 0'" O>~ -;,;:~ .. ~ w " ~ o '" d> ~ " ~ "' . . ., . 0; 0.8..0 (:1')-', :0 o ttSoo '" 0 "'~ iI'J~ C')- ~.,.... .. ~gg :oo:r:,~ 00 0> m <OM aSci ."....... ~ ~8g ,N(\J aioi m ~ ~(Y) 0)-0- 'flIt..- ~ Oh I'- fIt........- ~.l() 'fg~ 0:0,0::> ~'.~ E :0 5 E 0 '" m . 0; .< ::> 1" . . . E w 1" . 0 ::> E .. z . > w . . > 5 "' w . 0; D 1? 0: E ~ .. ~ '"', << >- 0: .1' ~ e- &. 0 0 . E l!. e- 1" E ,(I) w . \al 0 c :0 ,;; U cu_ z p w :t' .,. > 0: ~ 0: W (!) 0 " a: E . ~~ I~~l~ 2Ent" as ~i B "'Q~Q)g >rn3u e:2'DE ~~~ Q) ~ ~J5 ~ Q,~Eg l.L~=<tl . 0 0 w ~ () ~:2 ~5~~ <::'0 ~8 g~.co E 0.- C g},o.g-g roc",_ ;ij~<tiE ~~ ~* u coo c (() -- u ~~-gti ::J >:0 <D U 0 :;: 6' gCi-eo. U E u<J) ~- (Il::l r~ ~ ~ , a. 01 > ~8U::ill -_ .::l ro 0 (ll c a;-S>~~ 0. -5 <1l ~ .g~~o ro U C (I) <J)(/) _Q ~ 1E5~ >,- 0..'';:: -g~ KID 8.f;2~ (pun", =5~Elij 06;;;~ ~-;- ~ e ~ o ~..... O-(J) ZEEEin ~ "' z u: w . :0 m e- .. 15 e- " o 0; D E . 15. . en ~ . ~ E D o en "' u o a: "' w ~ o o '" . c Q ;; " is o '" 1" . E "' c . E "' a: "' w 0; > ." c . ~ . 0. E o y (!) Concurrency Management _ 2 J . " o 1 ~ o " < o o 00 ~ z ~ w > o ~ . "- < - !i~ <~g - Ii- <~ "'0(1) ~~~ ~s~ z< UU (J)~ ~" z o o u ~ OJ o u o " . j c . . o f . u " ! "' ~I~ "' 0 ~ g ~I' . .. " . V'i " . ~ <1 c " . . "' ~ "' . " "' ^ ~ " " " " "' . ^ , " " ^ ;;;; . "' "' ,;; :" ~ ~ "' "' " "' "' ~. 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~g , z ;:;i "' ~ ~ ~ ~ is " ~ ~ ~ ;:;i . c " C c, , . c ~ < < c "' 0 .. " ;;;, "' c " " " if. if ;;., "' " "' ./- ;;. if if, ^ , ~. 8 ^ c "' if. "' C if V: ~ ^ g ~ "' c ~ .;, C if if .. "' ,;0 '" ~ " , ~ ,-f;l o ~ < o o . ~ z w . w > o . . . "- <- ~~ 1 g .N ooo !!!~~ ~5~ ww~ 59 OO~ >" ~ z o o u . w o " o u o ~ ;i :ri ~ ~ ~ ,-,,':; " . ~ ~ 8g~8~8888888~8888~~~ao~~~s~~~~~~s~~so~sso~ss~ssssssssssss~ssossso~s ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~ ;;( ~...~"';;; ;;;;;....... .....,... '" . ;;"'~ o o o s..,...;;;; 0 5;:;; ssss......ssso s s;;;;ssss....s... s ;;;:sss ",0 os,;;; ...:;;s::...s;;;sss ooc__c.~__ ........................... Cc 000 c.o ............................ occccocc._ ......"" "'...... S8S;;;;SS;SSS...SSSSSS~;;;S;;;~8S;;;SSSCCOSCSCOSS...C8o...8Sg8S coo C 00 : ~ ~ ~ E~ .. ;; ...s...ssc;;;sssss......sao5;SSScS...SSSOCSSO;;;SOS;O;;;;SgSSgSSS8S ~ " g g "~ ;.;; ",' ... Sg......SSS...SgSS;SSSSOSS;;;~8SSS;;;;SSSS...SS;;;;SS;;;;s8gss;;;aggs ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~. ... ;;;: ...... '" ;;;;gSSSO"'gSg",08;;;;;;;SSOgaS~gsggSSgggagSg"'gSSOgOs...aggg ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~a ~~ o:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~N;;;;;;~;;oooooooo8g~88g88g88gg88ggggg8gg~g8ggg8ggg8gggggg~~gg~g~~g NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNN ~~~~~~CNON~~N~~~~~~~;;8g8gg8ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg88gggg ....,....... ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ~ < . :: ~:::] ;; ~ ~ "C;J C <f~~~~_ ,,":5 f5~.E ~ -;;; -;;;::::>:::! ~ ;;: ~ -5 " :~"~.~a~ \; EO "" ~ '._:"'" '>' ~ ~><: ~ CJ.l;.J.i ~ ~ ~ ::::; ::::; :5 7 :f ~ ~.,., ~ "'" c.::: 0: }j~~ ~ 62 "" ~ ~ 1 :>: ',::: ~ ~ :; li ~~~i ~ ;:; z, 7. Z, et: Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < " j ~ ~ i: 3 ~ ..:J ~,,;: ~j ~ ~ <0-;;; o , --"""" " , ;.J.ic:; /. ""' cg'" V. ~ : ! ~ ii " , " ~ et: ;;; , ~ ~ :€ " ~~:s:o:: E ':.0 f~~~ ?:5 ~ et: o ::21: " --<<:"" ':;:E 1:~ 0.: ~ " .if 2 ~"'l " , , " , . ~ ~ 1: ,,::, - ~ "8 g ':1 ~ ] ~ ? o -, ii ::e::ri; ~ '" ~ ;,. f) - , (-, ~ o " 2. ~ i f,:' C c c . c ~--~ ;;:~~~ ~~~'" :::....: ~ g;" g g :=:~~~ "",,,,:,, cd 8 8 ~ 5, ::f coc3 ~,:::: ::: c ~ 2 " '/'/'/.'/. , J: ~ '" ;<.;<. , ; ~~; !j ~~~~ ~ ~~) ~ :~~ - 11.: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ] I:;; ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ - :;; ~ "'''' 0<:..... "p~~ l~z!_ ;;i~,,:;:;;::;:l::':;: g i '" ,~. .~ ,,~ ,t !; l.i': - .1' ~ ~] ~ ~- ~ ~ ~t ] s .. ~~ - j :* ~" ~ 1-'= ~ ~ --0 - '- oS - HI! hi ~ 1 ~ j " ~] d ~ ~~ HIJ : ~ ~ 1 : : ~ j ~ <>: ~] ~ OJ '" OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ _" ~ = ~ - ~I~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -:; ~ ~iii:c:~!~ :!.~~~i ~~iJl jl~l~ ~~;"~ii~ ";;~~~;J~ ~ "'''/l~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ... ~,.~ ~~~ ~~w ~~E~~g;~~ ~ ~~~~~~;~:~ <~~~1 ~~3~~ ~~~~i ~~j~~~~~5~5z~~/ ~ ~ 0'" 0 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~.' S S 0 0 _ ~ ]I~.' 0 ~ ~.'I g ~ 8 8 ~:~ ~ ~l~ 8 3 5 E ~ 0 _ _. ~.' ~ _ _. ~ooo?-2~?~O~~??-?-oO?~~I~ 0~1 - - :1; :1;--- -,-. :~.-, Concurrency Management - 23 N e , c o " > . , ~ " . > . IT < z C " ~ " ~ . ! 1 " , . ~ ~ w < o U IT ~ o N " " o ~ ~ , I o < IT < " , ! , ! o o . " a o ~ < o " < o o . ~ z w . w > o . . . "- < - li:~ <' ~ug "'-co ....0(1; ~~~ ~~::; 523 <n~ ~" z a o u ~ o 15 u 8 o o ] . i r . u " . ~ '0 ~.", O~ _ ~~ 00 0,_ c,o::> <:0 00 .., .".., ..,"""""".., "''''''''''' ..,"""'''''..,,,., ",,,,,,,,;;;, ;7,;;'';; ..,,,,,,,,.,, ""..,;;;v:,..,;;;, ",..,.;;;..,O,;;;",_..,~C..,3c..,..,,,,..,..,C,,,8_,,,8~ '" '" co", ~ S ~~ g '''''' "'.;;;~~""~""g;~""3",,~,;;.;;;~..,.;;;;;;,g~~~g""C' ;;; ," & ~ ~ """"';;;"'''''';;S5""v:,.;;;..,;;;,Cg..,..,,,,,.;;;Ogv:. .;;;g.;;;..,,,,, ~ 3 ~ "" ~ ,;;.;;;O.;;;gg;;;,g~g.;;;.;;;;;;,.;;; ;;;,"'g~~.;;; gg"" ~ g~ ~~ _ o~ "" 8 :;;,j 0.., .:;;, ,~ ';;0..,,,,,,,,,,,, '" ~ "" ~ '" ~~g,,,..,v:,g~ ~g~ ~:~ ",,~~.~.~~~o~..,;;;s ~53g2 :;, gg ~ .., ggg",g:;;"'g ~~~5; ~ N ~ ~=I, g g g g g 8 g g ~ g g 8 g~~.?:gg g~ggg~ c. "'.-, "" '" '" '" "'.., v..r, 0 .-", '" '" "" ".."""";:;; -~. _ <:> """'...., ",,,,,...., "''''' """""""'''' _ '" 0 ""....,"''''''''''''....,'''.... """"'" ...,5; '" .""",;;;5; ~ ,;;;;;..,,,,S _ ~ _ _ c ,. _' '_ 0 "'''''.....,..,''''''''''''''' "'''''''.... g8ggg8g;g8g8;ggggg8gg;;g;ggggggggg~~;N';N9.~g~;N~N~;~~;;~;~;;;; NN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN"," '.'. '" NNNNNNNNNNNNN " ;;,,.,v:,""o$,,,g;;;g ~g 8 ~ ~~~~~~o~~~~~g~2~~~~~og~~~~~~~~O.~O~O~060~~Oot-?:o~~?o30..oo.ooO<oo~20S0020022002 ~~~g~~~gggggg~ggggggggggR.gggg," ,_~~ '"~ ~,"",,_,","ggggggggggggg ~ " " ;; ~ .~ o .~ , o 1 j' ? !- ;:::;<:'" , ~ ~.s: ..:: " ; " , 1 ~ ~ J ~ 1 r~ i ~ ,,- "'- "" ~o 'f'x ";r. ;;F', ~ ~~ "" / /, E. c ~,: ~ " ~ i ~ ~ co:: of; ~]- ~ i: i: i: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! :<;<::<;;;. - ;;?:;; ~ ~ :~1::H -'- ;$ "':': ~ -'" "'--"" :!";;;;;;;; " c ~ ~ ~ , ,;; o > o' " ;;" SIC Os". 'C ,. c..,. c. ,. cT." 0 c.,. "I." :::~;; - - ~ jj :"'~ ]]] ;<;<~ ~~~ :0; ~ ;'c,)'", II II i I i i ! i ~ o o i ~ c; ~ 3': ::: '" '" L, o 0 :< ,;-: " 7./. ~} ~ II I I I I I I I '3] j; ~ "" ; ~ ^ II II T ~ " I , i I , I , ! I I ~. - ~,: , . I ;; tJ::,:,~ .J. Co ~ ~ < ;;'/' ~ ~ ~ r; Cj '" 1'::;;: - i'l:' ~ ~ ;<: _ 77::1:", cc , -- ~ " ~ , .. ~ E ~ .;Jj~ t ~ , 2:::~ :'5 c:E o 0 ~ r } , o~oc~l~ Concurrency' Management - 24 "';; 1. jjj 0_ -:;:. ,;; ""a '/ "' II , , o ~ "I 0< J 0< . , IT L " Z C . ~ , ,':: :; , I w 0< , c, o o C ~ ~ o < o u ~ , j , ~ ~ , ] , TI ~ , . " o 2 ! o 0< . " ''F ~ " o o ! l , < " ::; o ~ '0 c> ~ ~ E'e~i~!~E~5~1~~E~~~~S~~~S~S ~ ~ ~~~~~sa~ssDs~~~I~~11 _IIII~II~IIIII~ _I~IIS~III ~ ~~~ i3~N~~!e&~;~~~ ~ ~: ~ ~I~ ~ ~ I~ ~! i~~~_I,!"II~~~~~,~~i~3~~~ ~! ~!~i ~ ~.. .. ::l .. ;l;;i .. II - ::/ ;;; ;;; ::l 10 .. ;;; .. .. .. .. 0- _~~!Hi:~!i'd~~!l~~~li;li;li;a.. ~ !,j"'aft ~~~!l ~ :1 ~ ~ f- ;!!':l~~~:.'\~ :nn~" ,...,.. ~ ilO :H;Z._~i~ ;jq-ii !! - -- ..a....ll ...."" . " """""":>;0;10 ...... .. ii.. ,,~~ g~; ~ ~ ~~Iii..a a..;i:i;ai"i ~ :l~~~~~3~ " ~ " .. Oi 10 >i " " " " li; .. " ~ ~ " a g~ "a"";""",, ~ ~ "" g;':;:s:;:..:;:~lit..ll,,1O ;,,0<:> ~Oi ~ a:oOi ili ~ Ii ~ & l!l'WWm!;!:' "":il/iOl:ii; iOOiliOi """a :>;a "'''"' ~ ~ ;;l .., ~. 'I' " ~ ! a " ~ " :; .. ;,. .. , , - , ,Ol"Slilll "lq:<rt"llil..ll~ f! ~ ~ ~ ~ ! .-,~ r-- ~.!i~~,d~~ii:;;;::;~"''' ~J.J.:;J."":; S""" ~"~..,, ~ H g!:in :di!l"'l:i::;i:!;; ;:., S ~ ~ I I r---- ~!ii!!~~~~:l:~S:r;l";,,ji,g.. "iili"~""!i~""~"g::<..,,.. ~ ~-q~;;i<~;;:::~;; ;,;;; ~~ .. ~:. ~ ,I ' - , .;; ;;; ...."ii"Oiii""~";~11 ~;<~li....t..lit..lol;d;: ! ~~! ~ .i: I' . ~l.ll.ll.l~l.llq..l.l~l.lS:~ ~ s- s s ~ it ~ :l ;,; ;> " T- .. ~ ~ ~ iH ~ " ~ ~ J. :>; .. S .. .. S l.l l.l .. S .. .. ~ ~_ ~_ .. ~ loll> ~_ ~ ~_ " ~ ~~1..~ ~~ ~~~ * ~H I : ~ ! .. I ~ fi g fi - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ id ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ H U ~ ~ HI~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ii k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~IH ! i: i I . . I " I, I ! I ! I, H! I II !.! ! I , jj, 1 , I 1 j II " ~ ~d!~ i~~1 ~~i~l, ~ I~ B,~ ii d ^ j ~l'.!_ ~,J:d~ *'"'~ n . .p~ L~I ___, ~,'~_ .1. p, ;_ ~:!~~j.":J Ii ~ ~'':;:]~"I~I ~~~~ !1'j~LI~ r,~i~ ""\"1 ..., ,i" II H '1"1'''u- .t.~~ Le~ !Li~oo"';';~~~""-'I~ii.~:!i ~ ,,~~"'~:. .!d ~i~ U~U~ :~;~nqp~i~~:H-~!1 Hn~ ~~1:8 ~ ~!ij n ,n i J.pqhq~P,,~~,~~,~~lll:~;:;H/iiq~pp~_[ <'it p '~"~~~~~l~ii~ ~~~~q€d~~~i:'i:'nn~d ~I!I~ ~I~ ~'>:l .~!!l;;;j~,~:>:S'~~!j~"i'1 ~-i.;i~;;::;~~e "i~~~I,B.~l1~l! ~I,i\ t.~ nn~I~HnU;H~En~ nlnlnl~ n! II ! " ;:, , ~ ] ;~ ; ~ ".".HiUi . ",HI!!: ] jtd!H;i. ~ !jll~lil;j! liIIIN:lI! ~. ,~!~t;8~,~.:i i: I Illilj .; 1 > ! ~ ~ n ~ c_" j1U ~1f,liI! ~ ~ , , ili ., q~ I L l II "' , llIl ill I , i I I Concurrency Management _ 25 "'!! "" ''I'' II"" ill'" II II!! 1'lii'I' '! "'- "II!" !.I."I'! !H.!I"!" "II ii"! *II.!!!!"! I! !!! i i! i i i! i!! i i i i i! i!!! i i i ~ ! !!~! ~ I !~~~~;!~ ~ i I I ~!II!~! I!I ~~~II!~ ~!!~~~1~~!~~!!!3!!!!~!1~1~1~~ I "- , ""- I -'" - -- ---- -, i ' . , , , i! " ' , " 'r"" ;,'"", 'fl""'" 'I't' ,trio '*t" 'r'1"" 'i"'" 'PI"'" '1'1"1""" "in;: !!'!I I! P I ! i: I I,: III I! : I, i! I II, , rn;> f: f. i i.!""f"" 0;" 0; 'rl'it." ~"" ~! rp ~ ~1~1"" "IT 8 ~I" "U.i"" ';i~!;<!";< ~I""" ~""" f al.~'! "'.. i ~";;; ~ - ~S:..lild.liS: s: s: :i::Li:l. I I ' I Iii 21 ' ; i :! j- ; , : "I ~ l' j'I' i i I Iii 't! I Ii' " "I"" *'.'''''''' "."I'!' i'!! "." i"'''' '."!!' 'I"" i '+."""" i' , ".""" , ~ I ! ! !,~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ , i ~ ~ ~ t l ~ !'l!. U ; J; l [ ~ I i~ Iii i I ~ ~ : i ~ I Ii" i i" j! '" l'i l' I Oil"" ~ s: S So:i: J.1J.(ll.I~ s: ll. s: s: J.!\'l~ ~ liS: ~i "(Ir s: r'" s: J.(i~ ~ '" "I' s: s: 8 T: ~ r T' T~'" ~ i ~ ~ 5 !~I::;;' ~ ;;"::""" <. ,,0: S:S::i1us: s: :;:1" .... I .. I , ;'" '" -' I!i. '" I I'" .. i .. .. I .. ~.. '" ! : i i i : I j , .. ! i ~ : I : ii, I Ii' :! . I' i I i j i 'i i T"':l ~:l:l ~ iol :ll:i!~ ~ ~ iol *.;; ~:l:< ~ll~:I! p:< n P p q TQ:< ~:< ;:;:I!~'r"' ~p p ~:< p p U W- :l:;i. ~_:< ~ ~.;::'::? ~,,~, ~"" ~ loll"'lol :':ol:;;:l s; TO.i:.i: u li1 ~ i !~ ~ ~ [~ : :;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I.~ ~ ~ I ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ I ~. ~ ~ ~ i ::< ~ I ? a! i I .' i I" "i ~ .. .. .. .', :~i" i .. .. ;", [ .. I '" I ! :! I: i i ! i i I ,: : 'i j I I : Illi!llil!~I!!!II'i'!'llli;!ili;;'II?'II'II!;I;'I'II'i;1 j "'I!lli',!!"'!!!!!!II!!'I""""'i"I'!' 'I' 'l'fT' 'iY"ITIT' 'I' 'j'IIT I, "I'!'I'I' '!'II" !' '1'1'1'11 I!' !I'IT11'T!" I '11111' I!'!, '1'1"" ;I~~ I! ,tHi! TII ttjll" -I;' I +; II 'I,ilt- 'I' 1111' j ',! I': 1 ,I, I I I j' i I' I" I I I ' I" ! ' i ,I! i',' " ", I ' . I ' I ,I! . Iii . II Ii ,I!' : I ,:1..:" I.! ,i! j Ii! I'll 1.11'11 " llldl ~l'l iii, ::I.i l ; in' U IJ '1Ill; 1;!II~~!H.!:I' :~~;;; '~H> ~~ i:: '-- ~ "{ ~ ~~j~ ;J~j ~ " ~O~~td8 Ii~; I. I.;)!. 1.'1 H II!), iinl! 1,1" !LII ;;; '.:;1 : JH!:!I,I,~ " !~:{: C:jf (, ;:'- __ ~r _ .~ ,} ~ i j i ! r c,;'.' "1:-- ''LLi a:uo:~1il:;;"i;;:;;""a.i: ~ 1 Concurrency Management _ 26 , ....l ^ &&&&&~&& &&&&g&&& 11!11 !!!!1!!!!li :;;U:igU ~~ ~~ ~~E~~a~aa~;~~&a~ ~~a a (0 ~~~ ~ liIU&U&p; PU!I! i " .... I :. .. a '" " .. l< " ~ ~ ;: ~ E ~ g ~ ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~:;; a fr a~afrfrfrlilfr....~~....~..~~..a.. ;a......~ ~ rt a P * . SOla"..""!!!,,,:;;:;! , . a fr I>. ~ ~ " " " ~ :i;.. Ii;.. >; ji ~ .. " .. - ~ ~ ~ ~~ s frfr.."~"..aaoaa,, "........"""g.... s" 3 ,,~ fralilfrta~..~aalil~~~g~"..3a"gag....gg.. ~ to: a ~~~ (j ~ g ~ iiiiillNiNNiiiilillikliillliiiikii .....1...1.- .--'il""II'I""'I'I'. "1 '" ,"" ","", ,.,., '" "'1''' ".I'''~' I II I II I II :Id n s, ~J ~ ,J I liJ .!l ~ P L ~ ., ~I ~ r ~ hI! @ '" ~I J ! q ~ I.;~ q . ~ d ~ ~ ! ii ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - r'~~~:;:~L ~ l ~ ::!'I. ~ " , i1Hi " '; ~ ~ l~ 1 P ~ "' d~ q" ~ " - ~ ,'~ ~ ~, " n f' ~ fi ~ ~ " ~d " ' H~ ~ '" t ~ J ~~" i n b:d~ ~ ~ j HJ~ .111 ~ ~_'l i i ! I I I i~' ]',i !L~ h ",.';' ~ ='-I"::'3!'. ~.! F! ~'l ~..,",'~~ ~. ~:~ ~~ llJ r~~H. Concurrency Management" 27 ~I I ~~1 H; IU; ::;q '" ~.. I'; - ~. "- .., .b ~n a~ n~ cot; P'" ~u; ~ 0, :>lij m ~g~ ~ ~ . Hi ~q o-~E Hi. ~.o~ . ~ " '~~ 5 ~n EXHIBIT "A" COLLIER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL YEARS 2007.2011 II,,' laNe '"-,In..... [(emW" lilt tYl"" '-,1 I'lJl>l:,' L,dJJ"<' "n~ ,he ",or,'<, "I rncnuo' I'h,. c(''''''r ,:"luIlln ,',""""" 'h,'" Y,..", "'n"",,[ db,jl". "....,,"u..,. '1'1" "i'h[ ""Ium" "" ""kula[]"" d "'r"n,", ""EU., "'''"001''' f,,,..<'I, [VI'" ,',f p"IlI,,' 1;,...1\1\ .-\JI JdKLt, "", ''':,'UJ''ubf<d '''" ,,"b"'~,,1. 'I'll(' ,ul>[o,"1 ,101'<",,, [11< ',"HC<' "J "ddill""r" rt"'''''u<uIllll.edhyC,'llitrC""ntl'[,,'u,,,ILh(',kfl,'jLin(''der"'Ill,,,,'",,,'h,' 'nel,,,(,,'r,,,,,,' i1and",J,", Tefer"nce.1 ",'1",( "pil"II"'l'rnw""ll1Elellll'n' ROAilS 1"',,,'.Il"" 1,'."I-'p('nd,'U[(" I'OTAIIU: WATER 1,,''-'"'''' 1;:"I,xp,.".II1U"" ]'tnj':,l' I{,."",,,,,, ,~."'n'(' Ex,,,'ndilure 1{~H'nUI' ..\"~'''nl :;"i'.'."~IJ"1 S.l4__'4-1,1'" SiP.'"l,'" qL'4-1,l~" S,'! -' .,,(;' J' ~ 1 S:,SW $lc,'ILJil,(K'X1 $0 .~4.<1l q,.l(~i 1,,<I",)(e Yil.::11,.1"J SI'J..'O!,!41 ~.I'J.'W,lX" "',-'."".'" S!'.Ii~.;.5q SI, "i".IH' .,~ii,;~\(I.I" ,1,,"4144' .~'A',;,7".\ H,d.",,',' T(~a] ~1-("tI(04.21JO $657,113,1100 SI4ll.951.2oo $'_-12.2';,\.01(1, $-,41.2'i3,4113 ~(I \\Asn:W,\TEH I,,"l""'" ,hl"".-I"M. S(Jl.JlJ\~,\sn 1(,,,. 1",I,'p"J]',,,", [I Imp"'" I'-~<.." C; ',~ R"" ,\\,. ,\".M"", (;"_1;,."'1',,, R,,,,"o. (;1( (;"LllbiRc,mbuN''-'' ('j (:",.,-\.1",,,,,,,,,,1 J'I( 1',,,,,,1'<-,-, {;) ';""~l": l'u"J 1>( Ikwkr,'r(""\If'~U["" .I\(",cn",,,'" ,\.I\',,,'c:d 1<"l["I"",<",~t'" I(R R,'\'('"u(.Rc,crw y,.",'.lli,'RRJ WII. W"','r,\,,,,,,,',I~'\"'I"I,,,,,,"I',,, n I Sene, 2rK~, Ih,,,J, W' ,,,,,,,.,2IXJIiH,),,,h I" S(',,", ~)r 1]11 1<",><1, 1"('1 (",,,,',,,er.:i,,lh!,,', I 'il<j'o S1<FI",o"o ',1<1", ',1(1-']"""" \ld'."" W""., '--'''I'Ll;dAcc In'.\' I"''''I<'''<'IHH S'-i:..'",Lj"" 'ill W","''',''L"' '"'''''''))'''''].'1''''''''' h.,' III ""rL",~'IV,lblld, IL '''rL<> 21~J~ 1l""J. III ".,,,,,:':IlIJlbl<j, 'd,]'-1 ~II.I IJ"-I] ] ';[(1'.' SRI. I" " I~]-,\ SIO I ",,-, , 'd()'-4 ';Rr 1,,,,,, ~ 'I~] ". sin I sin;; SRI I"",,' ':1(1"., ~RI' j "",,;, "1(1'1 SI,I' lo~" Ii' "1<]'11 '1,1'-1,,,,,,11 .'[<]'1 '1<11",,,1' "11.]'1' ,1~l'i. ,," ';lill.1 \Iii I "('..\ \\'., ,p".r1,\,,,'" kl.\ )C,'K ';"0.""',.1.]' ".11,1';",'-'.'5 ':'''.'''.'.'J' ';'-','''I,IJ'' \~.('>(J,I~~: ,.W!""", ) )",~",.,,'" q ';,I,l'" "_'H.'.Ii'" <o1""lJ"" " "1'1-" ""llIi' I'"'' \,1'''1' \",:,~,; i.1 \ 1("1.",,., ';1' " 1:,.,',1,"" ~.'..',I',-,"" "'I'","'" S" ~" SIJ ~.;<ll!.'/(~"l", )-,(I~,W.(..14) ,<I 1,"1'" '1,"" '"'",rJlu,,J (,1< (,'"''''II"'",,buI'Cfll''''' ,'1 ,'.""']'"rv.',,,.1 ('K.~ ,,,",,,,,,,,,I(ed,,,,,.j,,,,,,,,,,,, ,:1..(:, ".,..-rll." ~'h",L.'" "",."" I ,""'" I , ~.;,Hli,.lH'U $.l.llll,.II00 ", I'AI<KS I"".,."u,' I,." I '~"'hl1'," ~.I<.!'RJ.lU' .'\';,':jr>:<, ~',,;')1 '.'".:<' lI.d'", >"}."'"."'~' >:i'}.71~'.1I!~' Rn"J""" ., SIORM \\XII'~R IJ'"I"'I'""<I"u',,, \""..'<~.';I" , I c.. "",',.1' ~', S,I],,"'I,:'I- B.-L1,"'''' 'in .~,.., ~W,'i:i-l5]7 $/~J.5'i-4.517 '10 $1.5111,,154,2(. n'TAI.PRO.II,rrs SIA32.4tl3,063 soutn:.,s Concurrency Management - 28 G\.GornprehensiveIEAR AmemJmelll Modifications - 2004 EARIDCA Submitlalc, - 1li September U;\ TOlal Tahles j'INAL Hpvised f'ormal g-1~i-07xls " . ~ ,-e ! ~ il ~ H " & ~! ........~,- .~ .~ 2 " o o 5 ~ ~ ~ o a. g . 1: E E . [ ~ ~ c . " ~ . > ~ " ~ ~ ~ . E . ~ . ~ o c ~ ~ 8 . " ;, ~ c o " . ~ . ~ 1l ArrJ\CHiYlENT c . ';.0 '" . ! ., " ~ ~ ~ i :; '" ! ~ i if ! ~ " '~~ II dill tl i1 1'1 U n it <l il. J! I., '" .... .;!ul:::> ID ::~wZf:: >- 0' 2 ,~ '( ~~~ ,'/' :;/ ; >,~ ~f," B II ~ e ~ . . o " ,. o ~ ~ ~ C . e iJ . . j! w ~ & Concurrency Management - 29 ATTACHMENT F ~ -~.... .. 0lL....~ \. , l_ 1- , j . -1 " --..~ ~ .. "1~ ~ ~ U'/. -I I I~ ~, ...-.-.. . ,',v.. c<.:' ,>" '''--, , ; ~ <' .. - I i .< \~ r t I , i , i i I i I i ConclIrrenc: rVlanagemenl ~ 30 ~ 0 ~ ~ . i ~ j .0 :; , "! .0 l~ i1 10 ~ IH ~, IH ~~ %~ iG ~ ~ ~ > 0 c , , 'S; ~ g 0 . ~ , E E , ~ . <; 0 i < . ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ , . c ~ , , E ~ , . l ! , c . 0 , .~ ,,'';' !'" .~ ,~ ~ :4 0 0 . ~ [ . . , ~ ~ f d ~ , ~ ~ 1 '" -l : , , I : i I ! I' 1'1 i; , i , i I , i I '..... II. I, l' l ) ,$ , -+ I I" ~. 'z It I '.....,1 .. !r"" tl 41'1>";'; f1"'" -I Concurrency Management ,- 3 I , , , " . c , . "if . - H I U1~ ~ i'i'S ~ ~ t 8- t~h! 5Uni Ldh ";111 ';1 'III .I~~:rlr~ i1 2 --- QNITA 8EACH RD ! ATTACHMENT H .....,...;_lMpro_to.-......, ~, ~ ',j ':)\ ~ .. ~I , 1" ;'RAD\$ t........ ~. ''7.". .~~. ,. LEE COUNTY UNE ..1$ FOOT........ ~ ~ """"'.,J _ ...C................... err......... ,'_C,",_. iMMOl.AL-- 9<' -~-~~7-----~.-... /ANGtfH3'I_ , I.~ I:sfACH RD E,,~ ,,'.i_0.QQJ~~it 15:-,.:"::,~. 'eel> '-'~' ~ f -',~;: CSTIolou<fy7')1:l 1'C~~~ C".alllMllm.........., ~c.u..,1tIOtI ft;.Ml'.trM,<:iGl4 "',,,--. '~",",1('A't""IJl~ ,: :~ "- l';;liIA,iil_ill!IN FC;j'T~_, ClI,I<'lyCltf~ ~01hltH:t n ,.:(,t,:-r,_ i;.S:'-i,-'<,'<:" !'\..\MMl;r~\(.,-<r ~ -'. I:N'iIJ'Q.......'~"...." ............. ..... l!'DlI!__IIrOJ-l.riy flDOT~OI_. .......ElCA...A-... <.. 'oncurrencv Management ~---------l 34~ OIL NEi.._RJ ...____'~~.w_____,.~--- ._._--,- __. ';..;,,:'" ;L h 3:"'\'~~ ._"~_r'-' i":' '':':: '~ ';t'lllfllilN1o}fl;;9 ....1 .---.- legend ~ ~ " , " , : ,-,~ ;; , ., .. " , ...-.---t-- I I I i _ Et:!otlog Of.!ficJSncy (Tr:rl'fll; C:)tlflt!i fXi:a1ing Dt>fJC1ency JVe.itlld T.-jps\ _.'t010[)(!.fICIer'iC\I 1T.~MA BOUfllja:--y TCEA Boundaf'j ~ . '11; ."1A. "1.."J71 ~~,?~ __-5~ ~ 1::' ,k- I f I I !!' i 'd>. ! i;.: .~ , " ~f -1 " I ''':: ~I ~I~I~ "'1""-' <f'. :lJ;~: ~~!Z ~;;;'i~' "~I" ~j1j; :I~!' ,~l~k 'k(, :.It'l" '~ ~I;- ~Ij, 'In '';.'' , f' "ij ;1 ~ ' .., ....".'. - " .~I~~ 1 tj:~ '~,:'~i:.! ".'1' ~v. ";: :li)i" , 'i~I' 3'''':.;: '':: Ji!~.,I.,. ~ 'ii~'f'" ,g ~~r? <t, " ~, o .~ " " . ,. ,. " !l! . c, " S$I~ !:-if.'8'=i g l ~!~ ~ ,j :;t.,~, - ; f '. . :~ ~, '" ,''!! ~ i Q,?j 1';'.= ,.,.:!! ~ ~ :Jf! .ITI"'""" III :.,: I , , I , i I. ' I i I , j; 'j ~ '} :;Ii, ,~'ii , I::::r~ i I::..~.'..".; ,?! ~ ,"i~l> id'i1!" l~i~IM , ;lil~1 ~ ~lil!l~ Ill' ~.,liL~,1 ;~ :ti~ j:2 0,,,1,,, __cl ~l~P QI~ s J~inl.~ - ~,gl', 7! '~ ~ !:-:.'I.~li~; .". - ,0< S? ~ _'!l ~, ,~- +~.:..l..O:'t '=- -<l ; I,. ~~!~;!:':'!;;~l~ -- rt'i 5 .5~ i ! I c' 1 i , I . i . 1 1 ~" I I .1 a: : i, I i-i ~ I , , ~ '"i"i,;i;j'i~ "I'-("!'-",'- ~ i r ' ' i I j , ," I' '"'. ,~ 02' ~' ~' ,-21; ,., . ",', z ,- 'S ~ i .. . 1., :; f ~t, Concurrency Management ..- 33 [ <' ~ ] ~,~ fi ': ~ ~ ; j}~ ~ ~ , ~ " ".';; " if ~? .1) ~ ~ ",_ci;; 'j,,"-= ~~ ~.)N:TA .~,:~CH f~D ';'\./f'; i..... . .y ~ , ~" . ~~ :~~ :-;; :'.~ 1 ':862 .t' r:. .,; r.J C..f F-~ ~j 896 s ~, ;j. . \:: ~~ " 41 1..1:" " -: i , !I'fl"'111'~ '1~ 1 ~[-"j C':~f6 '. , l ,) F ...._,..."'i--" jl\~"iJ (<.y,~ ",.->. , ., .. '~,.l.. ""."..~,l ',-,' '"", '",Ie:' <.,.. ~ ~"'~'. _."'-<"11'''''''''.'' AT1'! ('/.-1" ~I:':UT H \,,,..]VI_IIi. ., <;4,; .~ ~ ,..~, . ,~. ,..".,,.. "."nl"",'.'-"';fI<~'or'",>-",,,,,_,', ...,'...."JI'~_'''''''''_'"''"'".'''' ,'.".. ~..'" ''''''''''''''v r'y'- ",',\ }S 1 ri: ,lij..t,- ...,-: ""1 \''"".,....,.. '....1 ,::>0 G.n.;.~.l'i .~J 13lVC , .A' " . "~'. ....,..;or ." :_"""'''''''!''''''''''''''''''' 'U"'I:.~T''''~,."" ',,~,.. ..;.. -,< " ~t;:;.-'): :j'-';',-,><",,' Legend ~f_(i,;>;jfji) (';;>11, :,jl'C\" :-taff;:: ::(;L.;lli,-;;' ! :W:,J:ri!,; -":r.~k"; ,;fi'~li' 11'1'.< 4! _:"0'1 [!c:,li(Jen(~'/ .~:~ :'.tlA b(fLli'Car'/ feE/\. Bnura.1al"; l"IJ\.t, '.'11[,11 tp, . "I., I!, I!', " i>1jf,*'lc '., r 0:"- . < ..":".",.... ',' - ~~, '''''"~'''' 7- . :,.) II'" ., : . .' . . , . ii;'11I- _::~, '. . ,..IIi~ . , ' (\H1CllrrenC) Management _1--1- l'."ban DcY<~lo(lmcnll.attcrns ,>T\TF.\IF'\T OF LSS{ l<: \r:.'("j]uati,,',n i.)t'th..,; iXh;Jn .Je., el\ irrn\.:'nj. Lh 1.>_' Ll C '. In<i C'I_:< H_!' I ~ \, 1 !) r::." , i; C',,',,'-., J:'.; ,!~1' _ t:i'.::,' ('~\ut'\ Issn: B.I,CKGROL';]) Ihc (,\1Jier Count;, U:\!P iLL" iH" primdfy d.-.::,igndUUfl.') v,ilh;;' r.fL.: FlILLW-.: ',d,,,;.j 1 '~(: \hp +<.lP ;.::TJ Rural., \gr'icuJtural -\il lanJ \Aiih.in th(' (LHJllt> ~l~\)~raph: \\1 i ['all \\:lhin \n'~ llht':~c- \.dt;~surjc.;Thc Tla,l\iril.v uf C::>i.blal area "'il:~t ur Cuunt) RIJl.l:] 9:; 1 dnD the entll'e ]mrn')ka,!t:-I.: ,jfr:J,)" ieh th...: J,,>;l5"rL.i:,i()(J l..rbun un the Future Land l"I",.: ylap. pn-,mi)lCS a Jl\iersit) Dr urban Jev:':!'Jpmcnl :lnJ ~i \;,~d.: \ari{:t:v 'lctfli..l uses \.yirhin these designated areas. lhe RuraL/Agrii..:uhuraJ designation dues llt:,t rr<2\i.?f11 Jevdopment, hu~~ rath~' limits the array of land uses allo\\ed within th~ JesigmliJn. In addition tu the limited :lrra' c,f land uses outside of the urban designation, the Ol\,-JP Lh)~-; proviJ;;: r:c:;'l" c()n.c~ntrakd p()..:k~ts urhlrlilati~.lr through the development of tm,ns and villages within the Rural Fringe ML,ed Use District and the Rtora! Lands Stewardship Area.T'he tDwns and \<'illag~s are designed to proviJ(' u range of lanJ use:Sv"ith l)ptions within the range of housing lypeS as "ell as mobility options. The tiJtur~ cbelopment of the t""I1' and \ i\lages within both of the districts is a primae) strategy employed by the G~lP to bring g,Jods, sen ices "nd employment opportunities to the eastern ponion of the County and end a reliance up<m the trban area tJ the west IDr these commodities and the vehicles miles trmclcd and corresponding green house gas emissions 'lssociated with the long commutes With the absence of a designated urban service or urban growth boundary, the Collier County Growth Management Plan utilizes two primary controls to shape or influence the pattern of urban development, capital expenditures and land-use controls. The capital expenditures contained with the Capital Improvement Element of the (IMP provides for the expansion and extension of transportation corridors. public facilities and urban services and infrastructures which shape the land market. The Urban designated area has been the location IDr the majority of the County's capital infrastructure expenditures, as evidence by the infrastructure maps provided for at the end of this section. The Land Lse controls established by the GMP and implemented within the Land development Code shapes the arrangement e)f allowahle and prohibited land uses. To evaluate the eflectiveness of these controls, an assessment ,)1' the growth and development within the individual planning communities provides an appropriate barometer. The urban planning communities are North Naples, Central Naples, East Naples, South Na .Ies Go.lden Gate, Marco, Urban Estates and Immokalee. The rural planning communities are - c (.-" I \ If..: . ;. , ,; r" , '. ~'~T~-:~- ~.._=;:~';-~~'._ -~. ',_-, '.._.l.\" . . , I AN r-... ~.J f; ,.i...._..1f'.,IIJf-,. I I It _ ~~~~ '"M~''_''' ~ .-........,,-.....-- 'i_""'n'~__,_,_' . ...-.....-..-.... _, n_.'_~~", ......~,..-......-- ,:: ~ :::::::; ;':.~'.:'~'~"; ... .-.-._...~..- H..'..,...."._.._ ;':-~~:~''.:~';.:.;;-." _.__.....,.:...,~.._.-'_:.c~; I Urhan Development Pi/Item .. i % oHand Planning Developed Undeveloped 1 ,Conservation Alricu Itura I Total land*(Iess land (less -r I Community Ag) Ag) Preservation , land Acres Developed North Naples 13,500 4,381 501 1,123 19,505 69.21% , Central Naples 5,743 702 61 156 6,662 86.21% East Naples 3,853 807 19 1,186 5,865 65.69% I 7,543 ' South Naples 2,530 989 1,517 12,579 59.97% Golden Gate 6,863 1,254 46 137 8,300 82.69% Marco 1,486 4,741 12,472 1,510 20,209 7.35% Urban Estates 14,376 3,474 288 2,904 21,042 68.32% , Immokalee 5,041 789 1,137 10,788 17,755 28.39% SUb-Total 58,405 18,678 15,513 19,321 111,917 Urban "Source: 2009 Property Appraiser Records & Collier County GIS data) "Jncludes developed Residential, Commercial, lndusiriai Instltutlonal Use iand. Government, Golf Courses and q.O-li'i Utility, Outdoor :Rec lal'G etc With the exception of IrnmokaJe~ and the i\tlan::t) rjanf1lng ..:nmmunities. ~ach urban planning (;ommun it} is at or past the sixty percent developed stagc. The urhanized area "ith the existing infrastructure and sen!ces readil) available is "here the County has anticipated the majority of development to locate. As the County transitions into the next decade l)1' gro\Nth a.nd J~veloplllent ~t ~,..;; expeded that thi-:; patkm \hill I.:ontinue as each of th~ urban planning communittes begm to approach build.out. in addition Ii) the expected gmwth "ithmlhe urb.m planning communities. the one rural planning ~nmmunjt)which has e\.perienced considerable grnvdh .,\'ithin the I:AR evaluation period is th\: rural I;;,-;tale,>; The rnral ~.'states \\llhiJl the F,,\R evaluation peri"d has seen a thlrty- six percent increase in developed acres j he magmtwJc of tfu:, gruwth, \rvhili\: not unc,\pected duc tD the pre.. platted nature of the planning COlllHlun i1). ha~ plact.'d pres~urt: upon the transportation 'i}:->tcm due il) the limited land uses allowed I(]r "Ithin the planning communily Whether th,s pattern of development In the rural estates continues over the next seven years " contingent upon the ,upply and demand balance of available units and their pricing points in the Urban area. Whatever the tuture rate of gro"th is mov ing f(ll"\\ard, general accepted planning principals recognizes the need to hring a Jiversit} of land uses to the area. The private marketplace and County government has responded to this pressure "ith the adoption of the Randal Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the Future Land Use Map in July or 20 10. specifically to bring the goods and services required by the estates residents in closer proximity to the communitics dwelling units. Scrvices and employment opportunities continue to develop in neighboring sub-districts to the rural estates, as well as request to bring these opportunities interior to the rllral estates The following maps will illustrate the location c,-isting population, vacant and undeveloped /,md I(lt the Count) as well as the location of the pubk facllitics and infrastructure currently available. [.rhati J)CVC!f)!)fti!.!tl! Palif.!rn j~,.,,,,.,, ~~ ~, ~ ~ C<<islmr '~Miles :.5 10 :i G~~.*THY!W;.)IIT' ~Il!;[,('€ t , _l,oultan I.. .:Jr: ~ 11.1 I ~ , ... .Rq" ,j.\. tl .'t ~t It . ~ \' . . . \.,.L , -.1' . ." 'tt I' , . Royal Fal.pa., / ~':jl -- """"'''' ~.. I I ,,- .'IIiIJc.p.. '1"""_ .1__ i_OIl: 'ElI","" S"'",_ ,)j6\1or> 'A",,_ .~.~- ,- ,... :II...... J , imnoblee ..\!:'\ . ' ,. JIJIERCEHTAGE PER'IJ\HIIHGCIJIJINW 1 ". O;;HI( ___. . J',,'''~ I :' \lIIJ(II(,[iUlE I ~ . ~ II ...J 'i-' ",~!r 3 Urban Development Pattern CO!ERCEHTAGE PfR 'lJ\1IMIIG cOllum 1." '.r..... COoAICIDUs PER PlAIIMIl>COIIMJNIrr cJ!f;rc.mltl\ " . J r "", ~;;.." '. . ".' :" . ,"-..1 ", ....\ """ ::,~) '~1J1I~h i.,. 1'lliI!,...,.1 ,i.1r. .~.'.'I.!'l'. ,: \ ',:'" '"It!!" " , Il~ ' . .j (rh~l!f lh '"'dupmem PuiJern . i'll'nd >>"'~~'A~ : ~......Q1 '~,~ ..:~ fl!...u -..-J~'~' T.'~u i't':I!\.i,~'1l -.J 'I';,' 5~~P,""..:r .is:jlj,;FoI''~ .~l:,:-:,:,~~ .~~l :.D,:......<tt .".'.."",." r----1 IIW~ ':.,) Ii] ":'~~~t\...."" 'i.o ."~:':'~.....1,;:ro:l\I~~'Il""l t 'y '.-' \., "'.J N 11 - l.) !"" ) :~{ j , U 1 l; ."\ i""\ "I S ~, ..1 eDt, CAuuo '-"-'-"'---':" _....,.....~ : I .--"-, (" '',j" ., - i "-'~-'-""I l . J ''\ ~ '\ , \., " "'~ --. '..../ , ! " .' ~,\ j \. " -I ,A, ~ ,') t ,.l.~ ~,\ , logoncl :cft)~_tGb'rTAZ: ..'li~lo ~-j;~. j.~"",~ =.J,'li-,jJJ~ :J~.!J:/ln:ft :J"'.....- ~',.,...._. .'.$1 ",,,,",,, .)i,!Sli,,2;rr~. .~r~.4lti'J~t; .~>;J:'::''''-'I1'no;1o I~Mil€; .J LJ !I] :';~\1lnfI;"~"W 4e\.A~""', ,'.:.Q1:':&l~l'rl<.'~M~", + 5 Urbon Development Pattern \ ~~ I " OI'IJil;t4ll'l'l'.... -1I1MTl ..1l~ > "" "'tIMlT'\.<<r. """... ~I'IT~I. !.cr:t4JI<t. ... 'Al,;nl~,' ... "'ffl'" :m..'....'Ul .... .....a..'. '~- DeE"'!' .... .. M.D .;.u;..1IU:I ,,<i!.! ...; ...; 'M' "';;':',-.:.,: '/l~'. t~ . . . . Jit . u".cr.I~ ...1:-611I' ~::h"~T ,..... I' .J",'),;; E.(lsn~~ ..~,~ F', TY:[ 'V.'i]EWA TER ':E,'"I:'[ A<EA" If. :.dlBo':'}JIT'Ir..E....~r ~1lf.~15'1.~~, .;Jt,U;'~ :'J~..:.~1[lMm ':",f.l ;' 1'/1(1" li,>, i ~. '. . . , . t.... "1'\' I'1io. .....IE.. Cll :.i~'lV': liII,lIIl1lEi 1'IOlCIlT't.WI' :2,T!, '."'C;'Oi' :QMTR1Il .1Tr:r..m .."'~" 'lTf"'I"tf'. ~1:""'" ~~ ;.~ 1NJ:c.. ~1I~,.f[ """. ~~...., -- _,","" 'I'lt'~.T E\I".ThW: .~ii r.JT,Ii"E 'll'~TEG~ERVICE ARE~S ,;UE~ ';.;;;1ffi ;t~{llM:e.r :li1tJ:VIlJIE"l'IJo1IlIIl' ~'" ~.o., IINW,g,DlT !'.IIl 'f.l'fDIIaJ~ A . "! ~ I'll /'u!i(',"fl-. COLLIER COUNTY DEPENDENT AND INDEPENDENT FIRE DISTRICTS WITH FIRE AND EMS STATIONS .l-~!:_-."I""'!'. , 11. ,i" f , .".~ /2, ~5 IJ'Jf.Nl) :"X:).it.: (-,~-~- f'. I . '>---..... ~ it, 1,'- ~ . 4t4P~~: ',qa~ ~ , ~ I i I, ~ ij: I I r+,~ i , I I ~lilt t)$iitlCl!$ \/AoWt. ---1 ;Ig""=' '>l CJ~>,,,,",," .. 8fl"U.J,i' ,:!!.:".lj'''4r."y :~I~~~!:\'I ~~ f_t1~i:~>:~ ~, AI." ~ [:O:<ercwtt'~n.' C~:Z:~Pn: D.,,...,,,,'. . ['o:lo,IP. [Jl"T"Cbt,~"1'l' o 1:t:.1C.!Cfr,'t. n~:1R,~!'l: ~.J:i:M_,~t:'~! ..:...."" '.;f.:.1 LEE COLN- i nl)th'~~rl(e \ I , -, ,~:Al~r CQlJ"~ frl! I:Oll,:r';ounlyf!r~ 7 Urhun Development PUtlenl,\ ~ ...., .J' ;. \,; ., ~ .....] \..~ ",' - ". '- .\ '.. \e -:: '~..:T~. / , 4 I. / 4.. .-.,. I ,-'-' /f . I i/ ~/., '. . i-' '_" ,'';: .w::c -, _.~..- s ....OlI,. .......~ ,,, z~ . '. .',j . r)u:li;;.:' '. '> - CIW )~ljf'HI ~A'IW Ii, /~.~" -- ........--.--.- ;')/ ;'.:1,)'.",,"'-'/ I--:~~.,,- t '( I 118 ., ! !! III . I 'iE! COUNTY ... It;~II'9'':'~)l''I~ \ <1''''.'''''..' ,:j '('lJ,Il _.~~-'" .".'11..';.." 1,,'~ltjutj_l, . ..:!,~ .. lNl;,-!':'t:...,r;; ...' . ~ '-.'" . , ~J'"" .....~lI.cU..' .I, .~~;~:u f :: ..vt.:t..~-'l' 'j ~~ ,.\.. _~U.1Al!...),,:...;. r:~"~.JW.ri.' Ijl ];" ',IU:~~':..-.;n.;' ',., '.-.... ,., '" .t-.... .'!Ml"."jf4JlO1.., .,...,.11" .~) .MtlrlOO":!,b~i \, .:~ ~ ~' (............ 41 ~ , '-",. i ~ 8 rnan Devf:dopmem j',-llIen! \ ""i'1l. . ., ~rCotltll; .....-"......~^...._.. . .l._____.._... legend - M~RoaC.' I E.rist1g B..lill~~ " l~J~~ SIJIMirlJ II......,U.... 0 --=' lIf..t.rlfl'1_ ..... ',. - Ijl '1' ?~~::~.lt "\ '\ " n '-I " \, , ! n \ 0 r \ T -1 " , b r, "' , : 'i , ,. j ~ . j'f '- ., ~ -oJ "'" J a;- L' . ~"~.. .......,---, '-'''..., . -.-.--..--, ~l~~_ ~,~"II I~ \ \ \ Jl<ll*' \ \: \ ,j' "._1\' iJ. I l \ I'i.~ ail ~~'H,.II, I \ <, - , aJIl2JItW II) I f&/ -"- ,.,.- ..-1 , \ I .11 If II ~, [LEE courm \\ i . , I \. ,-. II "'~~~j.' ."""'.~~>:"l~ , . , ; i ; ."i'4mIMMOt<ALEE1 , \ --t -f L ~ '" :;). !.~u ~~!M _Mi1jorR= W:M<..:t'/i! \ \. it. " - " ~! .., 'i -f <; m Ex:~;ling L-D..~fI/ ~ -~' "e:c:.)"':~.tfY'J' 'I~.'" ; .,'(-4. f ,n . ( (A ,. -- -...-- ~._._i..:::~--=-~ _.....~___ .j --..-- ~-=t"""''''"''":-''t.. I i I.. ---_._~ .--+-. , , r---'~'--'- I .._-~"' i ~, ''/ ;tl'\t ~l \. .,;~ ~), ,~. \~I ::~~. :;~,C,] _tf;:(, 1! ~. IJ,y:c :;,)IlC l "I\Y'/ r, "- ."-- ~ " . , "'I .-"-- : ')l E\'~:Jet':, :::i _~"ri if ;l~~7-~~----- ,), "'- J ---'~. i VfRGLADES CITY !!~_I ~ i I." li 'I Urhan Development Put/em ';:~r .IIL .L>L" UL , -' Il v .' , i / ,'/- , "~~ '- \. AUCDlID ":'."-"'~-"--' ;\1 ~-Q,;I; " ,;\,.:.1*~ \--2.\' /" -. ''''._.._ ~.t' "'IIlClII....:a.1IlarrIM -'" ;".:li-';J , 41 If I , i"'~d"lWn 'L' Et- .'('.i 'NT. \ I...,J..I I '\IVl.'A;t: 'I~ """Jktl!olkt<'J,f ., Il'l i.I Iwlt~........;; ~~ ." iJ.lI;'TfIQllllllI~l....o,:lI'JlIlr ,..J_4....I~IU'..J v.:c1i~l.MlWfl1~. CA.r':,... JQI!nIl>lIItmUJ!mll. iltd~tqI(t .P1\at1 ~C~lII!:, nWfl>;t "kl"""._'Ir.~&W.If..1 'f"--=----- - .-.. '."*9llr.'l"AlllUA':ultr '" " , :I .t~$.i "" .. - "'~ . ~ 11 II! frhull Del-'e{opmelll Pallcn' " ~":!!Klli"'_~ I;l'\~ '~MIlIai':o)I'dJo; :! ;i ~ :1 -If I' -' ''"'--- -. , .,. i".if.., ({'l1IJ,:,' -~"\.,,-..- Legend - ~'... Roa& W l.I :lrsling GvvFnment ou'd,"~ G<lVfrm>enl 8uicl..~ Und@4'Cl)~OO ~ - -"-;;."'""7- - -==:;. "":/Xt lIC " '~ HENDRY COU~F' -t:! ...~I;... , ~MiJ?,; ;"' " ;" . -'~~\I!:;u,l , '. ii,i r, i.,i ..:: r- .00.\ r<, f\ \_ \ ~ It ,.... ill ~/ p~p^ - , ,"", ::- " \ \ ..."., \ II ',I, . \ '\ ' \~ .. 1IWi..4i1d " ~.ll'U'I~:tU'lt~lI) J' l1\l/ '---- d,.. ~ ~ I I ; . + I }\ ',EE COUNT' :1. L' \ ~.~~ -."......... : r........,":I , - '".,{ ~. i J1-."[Ef I t- ~ n. \~~I'\ I -< , '\. ,i 8 ,...."1"""_) I!-, II ~ t I .., i -< i '-*"d ~/I .'-< I (1' . I i I .'_Cllf' I .I"I!fIotJ"l"!'!f'O,~~~r I ,..:reltl:ltlJl<: ~~ '-----..-___,__1 I I '../ NetqnDOl'hCOd ~~"t . R~~ ~lIli . '......"',_.. \,,"~'j"fljo"'1 . oiIlI..l . :JMh1!'OO<l!'.... ..,--- ,iJ.. .., .'~fMi. ... jt_it~.mA~i. :4hi.lIDil't\'"ltitM'1/l~i!: '~!'Il<;l , Jtme.':itil8fXii"~. . ,a....IWIIJitMY......'. ., '.1r iJ. W, , :, ..'- !I (Jrhan Development Pattern C"mprehensl' e "'~11 Implcment:lti'JD fh>.: c\ll!it'r (inll,,,th .\Llnal:l'nh.:.-r~l. PiJ'1~I'r1rJI'-!< ,Ch::c.!',-',j :-""i .J,.il':1 : ),-,' ~ t:i i!j ull:r,." I ;U<I r ,~.' l i(.mc'i1r,',vhi,_i nr" 'il'tr: ~k\ :1' 'f1!11 (; (I [ \\ Il;l n In,,' 'irr'i.1jl '1 ";!'.2n;l \. I [' ,!'..l,2;.:'''' :'il"' I'h~!' ~ (r :'J,l.. :, j r-~ Li I r-'I,[ i:.d:v 1,'1:, !,!r',' c' ur' lh-: rn>:~ln, i_I" ii:rll,j'~'!:\.'''' :(1.::,' ( 'U~l dr.:\ ,:.111_1' rUi!\ I_h.,:' .Il_ ;;1,) i " \.. 1 I [{'! 1"\\ Inb p_I';''':; !u,; '~h: udnn d,;:\j~;~'')Dm(:il' an,; i uLu::.: l_~!n:_] i ',t~' \1 '-IC i,~T\J_L(_>J I,':.,' "~< ,'>'I! C'~,'PI,- r !rth..TI".. ,"- ~,:'r':l i;>:'UJnd t-t;-'k'l rh:.r \i :) t" ;;(:'1-:',,-,1:..' ;n,,(! r~" ' 'll.',! I,' :13: .- i\.' ~,' L ';1,' )',Ii , ! j I~\. ",,\1 ;'; d:..',; _-":" \,1 prim~lrih h\ ~iaL:::' I' rh<" ;Jc. 'iT'-' ""'1 j ~!l:;:r~r. ,'> :-';;~L:'i\.l('d t'~'! 'iP ..1('\ ...< :-'1) ,.:(,1_ '~,..: j;',,--< ~'d\i,C\,.'11 ;.(l( .f-(:(i~:rJ! ai'\.1 ~Llt.: ','.' .;:' ~j~I.-.: dLlt_ \n;") l~':c <;.\btL'n~ pi,rt,. i)'1,.: i_',ur:(' Jil\.j ,!d"\:!nili::d:~;\.:';, '(i~' iJlJrl('. Th,~.,,:..~th:Lb<_,t.~I:l<1(~ .,. 11;lr'J'2r~',-:' ~'!'Llil: _ ir.' _ iJ'~ th,.' p(jlr<:r~ righ!.;, (:n\:' !)1i.Ji\,:d!!ili lnJ \\\r,;:'n,l:1r.1 ',.;-r~:,I1",'T\ 'i'the ..;\-.;L:ifl.., \\'h:CilJ..:p~r'Lj '"!r\Jf; H',~' 'Jxea. fh'i;;" Rural f,'ringe \ii\,~Li I,,;: 1 )j..,lrJi...'l :Jilt! the R~lr:l llj::t..l:< 'ltc\'.,ardship \rcd ureh,d, ,;;-\.Jrnple::- land use r~gutatinl1:--; thai I,ven: i..ksign~d ";PoCI,:i :)(al i:-- j,. :.tddr';;Y~-.lrh~~n')pEJ'\! :lnJ 'indlki~~11.1..' 1<':') '.\ irhin the potential paUt:'fn \)fdevelopmcnl \\ith.in the (,-,unt; :1 hc')l..' r)i'~lrlCl.~ u'ihich \v~re irrLPknh.:'nL..:d ;\1,[nc tirnc il!' the Count:, '" iast EAR and h<:l.'y{; rcsulk.J m Jppn ,\imat-el:, ';;~),~71 Jcres t\\ 012 ":>.:l Jsidc t'r;,'Hl devc-k'pmenr. \\iith 5,017 acre.;; dedicated !.1~ ('om pad urn"n de,,':~h]rnh~r~ liased UP(!\1 thi:o: as.'-;c'.;:smenL tne currenl strategy ld jnt1uenc-;; the ur1-l.:ln developmem paUcrn 'i,~ b~illg ddcc;uatdy adJrc'Ssed b) thcCuunt), ... I lilt . II ~ I . , I. , "" UI I Ill. Ill' 1M' --- ...... -.- .---- FUURE ll_ UIE .., 1:--.......... i:;'::,~-~ --......... .,-:-."- 21-.- . I~"''', 'C""" f.". .-......-- 0 -- I 1 ,...,............."'..........-..~.... lJ--,-"~" ::=:::=--. Ial'IoS- . .. ,.. ...........'.e'_..~~.._ .fi.....- .~,......>........_-,'_:........ ="-!-='~ J _ 0-,- -'.-.....".-,...---.....,- :.:- :/'---=.,. ---- ,.;.;==--=., iilr-- 1&;:-'" -~-_.--.- !---- =~"- . .----........., . 1----. --~....... .-.,.. : : _...._~ 0------ --....... . 1-"-- i=~ .........,.. "- 1....--:-- -- __...._'9VI 0__ 0-- ....~.............., 1-- _. .~- . ..- '.~~i'5ioP".:"-."".:-'. I 1 . " i .__'="~~__.:'.=..~-..:.:~.1..~_.__ .. ~Wi~ -1 . . : I . I" --...- \'"J -~-- . ~ ; 1 .... _._- 1 . _._- . " I .. - .... , _. t:. I " . .. . . h' ! . 0 ., L. ..- - - . . . . . 0 , , . . . . . '_.~.,4,. . I' i=!.~-"'''' _t.~..-r-, .. . ., l_----.!.-!!..!-_.J___'---!U__L_ I.' I.' ._~. u, I _~_"~_!___I_____~~_~___L ..., C,'rbufl j)evelopmenl Pattl!rn \.;.; '1,'1ted the j 'r\-lnrl De\,-;-J,'f)mem Pattern InS:i ,1in:(:1 0c.':lrin~ !lr<I:11hc' inff:\~'rl<tun: ;lnd )~~(\,ij,>:.", rr"i\lded h> th,: L'GlInt! and theC-i\':lt nf provid ing that j r1fra:;! rudur~' d_l'l,ciupm~J1t ;j pcr;.:-,:ma:;,: r ',h;., ;','._,' 1_ 'ndt:r'<anJin._~ thi'_~ ",:,-,,;1 (':!:11iti(:.jti(11:~, h-.: f'; I I ;lrrangtmell1. \1r LEld U,,;-,.;" kll,','.:r inr'((t,--lll_k:LIIr;; dc',,,::, :HJ!ilc- l:,;"(i.:;tin<~ urhan:h:si:!-;ndt~d bn,j rtf,_\[:; ,\ tth~ R~;r'1j t:ringt: \l1x..:d [';i: Di'iuiu (R..:"\,\ U Jl~d t have pru'ii:)i-u~, \~ ithin the Dbtf1<.:.'t -) th~H r\:'qLl!n~ I.hlt lf1\. ill Lh\2' DiS1Tl<21 arc n.:q~Jirt:ij tlJ ,.;~Tah1::-;h 1]~C8] lJl.?utLlIji'__ rrnpad l'c.::~-, ~\.:nerah:;d and rrnperI\ LL\ ',:UHdk',_~ cli'i,J _,c~'\i~:f,:-, -\:,; dt:\;,;>loDlT1cnt nliJ\(':; furtI-1d d\\J'-. ((;'''','i ,.~\t2:1ji;'~ ':U'~ fLL~Ir:ld~;r': ':tJ L [~I' \I,!lie !"i\>:i~!:\ " 'Ir:.':i L , " 1 ',: ~ ," ,1:;' [11f:;flf T]' ill'': d':',,:'~I<~,(,1("'- ';;\<(:II;,_!I' I" i R!jF!1 ;:h:" I '_If' 1,1 [;"': (':::-g12IJ;,,-r, il; "<i:~;>:" f?,I_:r:V ! ~l:>L '~:':\,\'l[\j~!]j;:;\r';:'_1 i lZ~ :--; \) [j,;U <'I h lwbn:: il;\;;;,i{:plllcn I :h.:: , chr.: t_ !,~I;,li;::\ III r -'::.tJr'J" lljag;;:'e, :.llld ~,)\\I; ~d]L:'V.t",.! j [:'L ',I,: i -,C)', j ,.',:' '):L.':~! iii {n aJdicioll L-I eJ,,:'onomh': impau a,':ijo\.:iawJ \},-ith In~ (_ Dum> i ..b.Jr, jh;'\,.~iupnl<:ll( P::Hl\,.';()l, ,(h.:ui ,lj!t.i en\-inmmentaJ impacts are r~lakd to the LUUnr) '5 devc;opment pattern. i-\.s nOt.:d abo\c. a::; d;;;\cl(,pnwnt nJ,l\c'i outward anJcunsum~smon: und~\-doped land, the natural ,i;;nvlmnmental ::;>sknh are impacted, tTurn rW.tura: habitat r'of tbted spl',;l:ies to flood plain management, t,') wakr quality, tq 1 number (If natural ,;;yst:r.:'nb" th(' presence of urbanized development has the potential ill disrupt natural S}st8nb, It 1,.\,(1':; hased upur: dlh recognition that the County in 2003 and 2004 adopted the RLS.'\ and the RFMUD to better manHge Ihe development pattC111S within the areas uf the County out'-;idt3 or th.: C:rbanized designated area <lnd"djacem to) federally and state protected conservation lands. Again, it cannot be understated that 67 percent of all land area within Collier County is protected irilm urDan de,clopmenL The RLSA and the RFtvIUD, the areas that huffer these conselVation lands were design to attain the appropriate ~)alance het\.veen environmental protection, agricultural protection and property rights. The programs are both design to preserve a much greater area than lhcy entitle and r,equire the concentration of dC\ielupmcntto OCCUP~I a much reduced t~Jot prlnt of impact I,vithin these Districts and further i~nsure .a greater degree of protectiun to the natural :systems In regard to social impact. Urban Development Patterns have the potentiallo create unintended consequences to a Community and its sense of place. Increa~ed accessibility tends to increase overall economic opportunity and produ~tivit). providing for increased social equity. "Vorkers have a larger pool of potential jobs; employers have a larger pool of potential workers; there are more education options: professionals have more opportunities to share inforumtion; b'lsinesses have more potential customers; and im:reased competition forces businesses to improve service quality, Increased accessibility tends Ic' reduce transportation costs to individual consumers. busi neSSeS and regional economies. prm iding economic development benefits. Figure 2 Urban;izatiol1 Impact On Mode Split (Lawton, 200.') 100% 30% !/l :c. .:c: 60% f- - ,~ a; 40'% u - '0> a. 200/0 .Car 00/0 . Trans! L2JSI Urba!il Mooeralely Urban Urbanlnd,ex Ratin'9 Mos(lJirball The portion oltrips made!Jy n'onSl! and wal.kir!g increase as an area becomes //lore IIrbam:::ed 13 (irhan Development Pattern \. ,:"t'! I ,,'.\ ", '1~jY:\..'n1 < ! .'<''{: :;:r:lph "f~ [""'1\.:' " lOl-1-: :'!:JL\' ,: '''i;) !"ICt,':ll,., .'1 t.". lY: I 1'11<.,:>.' n. '-\',- jir:>\l UUin~ ".'I,:U':!i(~ .;.: i\,~' 1',-., :i:LJmpr ;Uk! {II ilu',,:'l ,. oil :~ : t' ;,~'n\] :'{" :In~'t1t., _'J .:.. i" n:...c 1.1 :ntC'n....liul~ i"'ar:ti('ti!.;~:'i ~ij:l'.ln~ ,.:t:\ :r!~'nr)--:,:t1L;; ~F,:: ,'l :':, "l.oJ: " 1Ul~.a~~i,,~' I;'j i' ,':1 L(:r: ,1 ;, . ~ ; ; ,.,;' Ii', '," -,y', n~'r' 'r '\.' 'i' "Ii,:i in '11(1 '. ~tn ." , '\,"li "'!ill!l: ~~,-' , I , ~ ,: " If)l' L:,j \'.1' 'h.., "" .11i' "',-' ".~' C', ,nil! .', Iii i;1d'Tj, "!i .hl .~r,,-: Jr' J[' ; t'~ 1 ' ,l In aJdiLiun tD th<;; Jdopri,.'Jf! lilfhL' Rl :-;.\ J,]1(i j t{j'\l! j) ()\\:rld:, 1.h-.: ,';.\IP Jj(' ,-hdfJ1/.:j \Lc!, through num;.;fOUS r\)iicje~, pr-orn\,lk"'; tho;? In 1 \, 1l1g l i U,<'.~ ~lill~ hfJ ng; n:; souds 'Jnd ',~~r"v i ("...: -,;.,! tnlL ,:ln~e prO\1iTl'lt:, L,J i',-'~iJ"::'ntiaj LnJ!; rh~' rr-:n1J,t~. !l1~(":d' ll-j,.,' r:c.:: \'\L,...'~1 i ),,~' cli..U\1i} {~,,;'tH':':'"' (map pnn id~J un [ho.::' i()Hov\iing [luge j L~ l,i ;JJn;.:.;;ntnH~ It'k' :llu~[ lnlclJ.;(' j~~nJ US..:'~. ell the -..;unJlu.;n-c;...' m~jo:r rOad\i\'ays afhJ :'Jflng guod" andSer\h':c--; ((I I.:ldser fXO\irn i,i! ~u.rruunLiing ({;sidenliat uniu'-i. .. ~.' ......t~,' . \. ..,......: \~X. '..~\ I ~;.., ;;<(' , ~; '.' . ~ " 'C .. . .- ';"", X 8. .. a ~ __ u_ . ..~at.... ACnYnY C8lI.... .-- .... o .. . _~C; _ '-';."'T~" ;:'~~ :-.I.....~'" ~ - ....I!~..Il'.""- :.7.......~:. ~.-:...__.i .:.1____ ~ :~I \. , ''1, '" '-:. 0;.,. f, ~ .,. ";> ~ _......- ..~ ., ,", .. - . .. - . -_.) - .- , // .-1 ~ ; ':"11 ' .'j " ~ ~~ ..~:-r--;:- t._ ". .... :r:li ,.1.! """ 11 .. ,6/' ~ c.'.... . 11 4 e, 0 . I :"i .. .- . \ i ,f:. L .' , o . L_. . .........., I - . , '.,. . -. -, ,.~ .,,, _. . I --- '~l . -,-{.' ':: '.('a"'.~ I!,,~L._". '~);.:i;.r. .~. * -..~,.... 1~"':'.....1' \.. ~~.. .. ~ '-.. ,~ ..L! "-t" 'It_...:_~ L_ j \~"~""" '. . ..,,-/ ....... ~t: :. . 0, I <,' !-fI: ~~'-, '~-+-'.'-';;/l::: '. ""', -c. 1__ .' <\\ ,.... -"'.J'.', . ~~_--,l.. ,.. "I ~..~___'c.""'" (_n, "~___1 _ _-'-"H _I~ L....."" ~~rE .__ .-c-..cc--..-::-....,........,..., . .. . . - . -~~'----'~'---'-~~~---' 14 r:rhun I)eve!opmenl PdJh'Fl! ~ .. ~ . .-- .-..... ,. r , - , L " , - --1 1-:::0- .". . r , t" . , ;. -- ~ . . ~ .. I "~.~I '.-~ .. .. ~ Additionally, the Activity Centers are designed by policy to promote a mix of residential and commercial uses within the same project. While the private development community has not responded to the regulatory allowances for mixed use or neo-traditional development in the majority of the Activity Centers, Activity Center Number Five in 2005 through Ordinance 05-58 provided for the development of the "Mercato". The development is a true mixed use project on 53 acres with 175 multifamily units and 470,000 square feet of commercial development. The same year the Town of Ave Maria was approved on 5,027 acres with 1,383,500 square feet of commercial and 11,000 residential units, with a portion of each contained within neo-traditional mixed use development. In addition to these traditional mixed use developments, the FLUE contains provisions for Planned Unit Developments to provide for commercial opportunities to service the basic needs of the residential units the PUD provide. Conclusion It should be noted that during this EAR evaluation, the Objectives and Policies to promote infill and redevelopment in the Urban Designated area of the County have been analyzed for their effectiveness in promoting infill and redevelopment, not only to address the issues described within the Urban Development major issue, but also address climate change, green house gas emission and maximization of existing infrastructure, which results in a corresponding maximization of public expenditure. Keith T. Lawton (2001), The Urban Structure and Personal Travel: an Analysis of Portland, Oregon Data and Some National and International Data, E-Vision 2000 Conference (wvV\v.rand.org,iscitechi'stpi,/EvisionlSupplcmcm/lav.'ton.pdt). 15 Urban Development Pattern Intergovernmental Coordination STATEMENT OF ISSUE An evaluation of the objectives and policies of the GMP for their assessment on the coordination between Collier County and the surrounding local governments. Specifically, the assessment of the effectiveness in coordinating the planning and provision of potable water. ISSUE BACKGROUND The lntergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) is the portion of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) that contains the County's Goal, Objectives and Policies with regard to relations between the County and non-County governmental entities (as well as quasi- governmental entities, including utility companies). Coordination between the Collier County; the South Florida Water Management District; and various private utilities in regard to the planning and provision of potable water is of outmost importance in meeting future potable water demands in a sustainable manner. Collier County is served by four Public Sector Water Systems, including the County, the City of Naples, Everglades City, and the City of Marco Island. The County is further subdivided into the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD) and the Goodland Water Sub-District. In addition to the Public Sector Water Systems, Collier County is served by four Non- Public Sector Water Systems including the Immokalee Water and Sewer District (IWSD), the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (Golden Gate) (FGUA), the Orange Tree Utility Company (OTUC), and the Ave Maria Utility Company (AMUC). There are also two Private Sector Water Systems which include the Lee Cypress Water and Sewer Co-Op, Inc. and the Port of the Islands Community Improvement District, along with numerous small capacity water systems that are regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). In anticipation of the rapid population growth and increasing water demands facing the State, and the potential threats to both the economy and natural resources, the Legislature amended the Florida Water Resources Act (Chapter 373, F.S.) in 1997. The amendment required the five water management districts to initiate regional water supply planning in all areas of the State where reasonable anticipated sources of water were deemed inadequate to meet year 2020 projected demands. The purpose of water supply planning is to develop strategies to meet future water demands of urban and agricultural uses, while taking into consideration impacts on natural resources and the environment. This process identifies areas where historically used sources of water potentially will not be adequate to meet future demands, and evaluates several water source options to meet the potential shortfall. As mandated by Florida water law, each regional water supply plan is based on at least a 20-year future planning horizon, and a complete update of each plan is required every five years. ] Intergovernmental Coordination Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has developed a long-term comprehensive regional water supply plan update for its planning area. Collier County is within the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Previous water supply plans for the Lower West Coast were completed in Fehruary 1994 (planning horizon 2010) and April 2000 (planning horizon 2020), which the County utili/ed 10 develop its 2002 Water Master Plan Update. The most recent water supply plan update is the 2005-2006 Lower West Coast Plan Update that has a planning horizon of 2025. In 2002 the Legislature expanded the local government comprehensive plan requirements, known as Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, to strengthen coordination of water supply planning and local land use planning. One of the most significant requirements was a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan in order to project the local government's needs for at least a I O-year period, identify and prioritize the water supply facilities and sources of water that will be needed to meet those needs, and include in the local government's Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements the capital improvements identified as needed for the first five years. Until the adoption of the County's 10.Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the County's Water Master Plan was considered the County's "Ificial plan r"r water capital improvements and the hasis for the 5-year Capital Improvement Schedule contained in the Capital Improvement Element. )~. ...fo> ~. "1"~O: ~'."''''''''''__'_.", ,....w<l..~_~__"" -.----- ._'--'"'-'''-- I L_ ___ '\".l_'1 \\',"-l ( ~:",t f-)!,li-j)\ln~' '\It',) \'bp !n,'( ri.:.;li'('rJiI!lClllOi ( (irirdinUfiol/ I /h/{U('{/jil'- /)n '(,!JIhe'/" ~u fu ( '( p(' .'ldo/)lioll ( UIlSldcrliU(lf! On February 25, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners adopted an update to the County's 2001 Water Master Plan, to provide an integrated approach for meeting the projected water system demands up to the year 2022. The "2002 Water Master Plan Update" provided for comprehensive overview of the entire water system, including emergency systems, water demand projections and demands and proposed conservation and reclaimed water projects, and provided a plan for future water supply and infrastructure needs to meet the requirements of growth, infrastructure renewal, replacement and enhancement over a course of five years. This plan utilized population projections prepared by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department that were approved at that time by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and accepted by the SFWMD. Water demands were provided at five-year increments to be consistent with the 2000 Lower West Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The 2002 Water Master Plan Update formed the foundation for the proposed County's Ten-Year Water Supplies Facilities Work Plan. During the State of Florida's 2005 legislative session, lawmakers revised state water law to include a new statutory provision. Local governments within the Lower West Coast Planning Area are required to prepare a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that identifies water supply projects, and adopt revisions to comprehensive plans within 18 months following the approval of the 2005-2006 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update. On January 25, 2007, as part of the 2004 EAR-based amendments, and in preparation of the anticipated Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, Collier County adopted language to coordinate water supply planning with SFWMD. Modifications of various Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs), as required by these legislative actions, were addressed through the GMP amendment to the Potable Water Sub-Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. The amendments referenced the 2002 Water Master Plan Update and any subsequent updates as the appropriate document [or the County's water supply planning. The SFWMD's Governing Board approved the 2005-2006 Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Update on July 12,2006. Therefore. Collier County had to adopt GMP text amendments that references a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by January 12, 2008 (or 18 months after the District Governing Board approved each regional water supply plan) [so I 63.3177(6)(c), FS.]. Collier County adopted ilS 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan on February 24,2009, by Ordinance No. 09-04 (DCA 09-RWSP). The adopted plan. and any subsequent updates. has become the County's appropriate document for water supply planning. Policy 1.7 of the Potable Water Sub-Element was specifically amended to incorporate by reference the adopted 10- Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. Furthermore, the Potable Water Sub-Element (PWSE) of the Collier County's GMP requires coordination with the SFWMD's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. Specifically, Objective I of the PWSE stales: "The County shall locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of the County owned and operated systems. said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be based upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's Ten-Year Water 3 Intergovernmental Coordination Updatedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updOled annuallv), fhe Collier County Water.Sewer MaSfer Plan, and the Lower West Coast Water Supplv Plan prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. " In addition, Policies 1.4; 1.5; 1.6; and 1.7 of the PWSE specifically require coordination with SFWMD's Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan. In regard to the County's coordination with other public and private utilities, Policy 3.3 of the Potable Water Sub-Element states that "The Level of Service Standards contained in Policy 3.1 are the minimum crileria for replarement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water supply facilities." Further Objective 3 states, "Pursuant 10 Chapter 163.3202, F.S, including any amendments thereto, Collier County has implemellled procedures to ensure thai at the time a developme11l order is issued, potable waterfacilitv capacitv that meets or exceeds the minimum Level of Service Standards estahlished herein is amilahle or will he availahle to serve the development under the guidelines established jor concurrencv in fhe Capital Improvement Element of this Plan." Also, Policy 1.4 of the ICE states that_the County will coordinate its adopted level of service standard within the parameters allowed by the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. In this regard, Collier County coordinated with other utilitics as part of the 10- Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan process. By selecting LOSS greater than the LOSS identified in Policy 3.1, FGUA and IWSD are guaranteeing that they will meet Objective 3 when development orders arc brought forward in their service areas. The 60 gpcd LOSS selected by OTUC renects the fact the utility only provides for the potable water needs of its customers. Irrigation needs are met via individual wells and community irrigation systems that arc supplied by on-site lakes. In the adopted l{)- Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. the LOSS for determining future demand for OTUC was taken as 100 gpcd. An important aspect of the ]()- Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan amendment process is the fact that Collier County strives in coordinating with all pertinent utilities. However, the County does not have the authority to force private and investor owned utilities to adopt the LOSS in Policy 3.1. Rather the LOSS are a guide by which Collier County can determine the concurrency of future development proposed in the service area of each utility. Therefore, no plan amendments that would require private and invesl<lr owned utilities to adopt the LOSS in Policy 3.1 are anticipated as part of the EAR based amendments. Nevertheless, and as stated in the above referenced policies, Collier County intends to continue to maintain coordination with the various private utilities that serve the unincorporated areas of the County to the greatest extent possible while taking into consideration the limitations of the County's regulatory authority allowed with respect to these utilities. The County's ]()-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan includes the list of water supply facilities and all of the alternative water supply projects that it has developed since the early 1990's and plans 10 continue 10 develop over the next 10 years. The 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan contains data that show the sheer volume of water that is generated by alternative water supply projects as compared to traditional freshwater projects. As noted in the 10- Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, the County is capable of delivering up to 68.1 MGD of alternative water supply to its customers compared to only 24 MGD from traditional water supplies. Based on the projects identified in the adopted 10- Year Water Supply Facilities Work 4 Inlergol'ernmcnlal Coordination Updatedftn' December 2010 cepc Adol'tion Consideration Plan, by 2018, Collier County projects to generate a ratio of 84.35 MGD of alternative water supply and only 25.25 MGD from traditional sources. The County' strives to use alternative water sources whenever feasible, and is proud to be one of the leading County public utilities that have adopted alternative water supplies as a way of life and is considered a leader in alternative water supplies in the State of Florida. Comprehensive Plan Implementation The Collier County Growth Management Plan contains policies that require the coordination between the Collier County; the South Florida Water Management District; and all private held or investor owned utilities, as well as the need of a water supply plan that specifies strategies to meet future water demands of urban and agricultural uses, while taking into consideration impacts on natural resources and the environment. In addition the GMP contains policies that require all pertaining utilities to be consistent with the level of service standards (LOSS) that are identified in the County's CIE 5 Intergovernmental Coordination Ul,datedfor December 2010 CCPC Adoption Consideration