The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 12/16/2010 GMPccpc REGULAR MEETING AGENDA r. GMP PETITION CPSP- 2010 -2 DECEMBER 16, 2010 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2010, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - November 18, 2010 6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS — 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, providing for the establishment of a Conditional Use to allow a golf driving ranee within an Agricultural (A) Zoning District pursuant to subsection 2.03.01. A. l .c.17 of the Collier County Land Development Code for 29.6 acres of property located at 6500 Airport Road North in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner] 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PUDA- PL2009 -742 Barefoot Beach Property Owners Association, Inc., represented by R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire of Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., is requesting an amendment to the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD, adopted in Ordinance No. 85 -83, to relocate approved unbuilt dwelling units from area DC -1 "The Cottages at Barefoot Beach" to Lely Barefoot Beach Unit One, Blocks A -K. The subject site is located on the south side of Bonita Beach Road in Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner] B. PUDZ - 2007 -AR -11381 Marsilea Villas, LLC, represented by Tim Hancock of Davidson Engineering, is requesting a rezone from an Agricultural zoning district (A) and an Agricultural zoning district with a Special Treatment Overlay to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district with removal of the Special Treatment Overlay for a project known as Marsilea Villas RPUD to allow development of up to 27 Single- Family dwelling units. The subject property, consisting of 10.25 acres, is located west of Livingston Road surrounded by Royal Palm International Academy just north of Imperial Golf Estates, Unit 5 in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner] C. Note: This item is being Continued to the January 20, 2011 CCPC meeting per staffs request CP- 2010 -1, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, to modify the language of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict to allow a grocery/supermarket, physical fitness facility, craft/hobby store, home furniture /furnishing store and department store use to exceed the 20,000 square feet limitation for a single commercial use, up to a maximum of 50,000 square feet, for Parcel 1 (9.2+ acres, zoned Bradford Square MPUD) only, and with the overall maximum development limitation of 100,000 square feet of commercial land uses on Parcel 1 to remain; the subject portion of the Subdistrict is located at the northeast corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] D. CPSP- 2010 -2, staff petition requesting amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series (FLUE/FLUM), to: modify the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay (B /GTRO); modify FLUE Policy 5.1; modify applicability of the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict; update the Wellhead Protection Map; update the FLUM and Map Series to reflect annexations, etc.; make FLUM boundary corrections in rural areas; and, add clarity, correct date errors, and make other non - substantive text revisions. [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager] 10. OLD BUSINESS A. Presentation of Watershed Management Plan update [Coordinator: Mac Hatcher] B. Note: This Item is being Continued to the January 6, 2011 meeting per staff s request. Continuation of Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance review and recommendation for approval [Coordinator: Robert Wiley, Project Manager] 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 14. ADJOURN 12/8/2010 CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows /jmp GMPA PETITION CPSP- 2010 -2 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS 2010 CYCLE including petition CP- 2008 -1, BCC hearing only (TRANSMITTAL HEARINGS) I E 111 E I E EE E 1 E 27 E 1 E EE E E Y! E E EE E E E1 E 1 I EE E I E= E 1 E M E 1 re�x. mr„ 5� M Collier County - Florida + - C. a 1 1 W � CP307B -i I xr�t eu+n � Petitions: CP- 2010 -1, CPSP- 2010 -2, CP- 2008 -1(BCC only) CCPC: December 16, 2010 BCC: February 22, 2011 0 • TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC - Transmittal of 2010 Cycle GMP Amendments 1) TAB: CCPC Advertisements. 2) TAB: EAC Advertisement 3) TAB: CPSP- 2010 -2 CCPC Staff Report. 4) TAB: CPSP- 2010 -2 EAC Staff Report. 5) TAB: CPSP- 2010 -2 Wellfield Report. 6) TAB: Resolution CPSP- 2010 -2. Tj TAB: CPSP- 2010 -2 Exlu'bit W. DOCUMENT: Transmittal Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: Transmittal Legal Advertisement DOCUMENT: CPSP- 2010 -2 CCPC Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CPSP- 2010 -2 EAC Transmittal Staff Report; Existing Wellhead Protection Areas Mao DOCUMENT: CPSP - 2010 -2 Wellfield Model Report DOCUMENT; CPSP - 2010 -2 Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENT: CPSP- 2010 -2 Exlnbit A text & maps 1� u • • PUBLIC N0110E YU15MU 14 V111.2 rUDJL.L;, kvvi��,�. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the Collier Courdy Planning Conxnissian will hold a public meeting on Thursday, December 16, 2010 at 8:30 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners chamber, third floor, County Govemment Center, 32% East Tamiami Trail, Naples. The purpose of the hearing is to consider recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs the Transmittal of the 2010 Cycle Growth Management Plan amendments to the Future Land Use Element and the Future land Use Map and Map Series The resolution title is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COL- LIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMEND- ING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, AND FUR- THERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. O Petition CP- 2010 -1, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, to modify the language of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict to allow a grocery/srr pertnerlet, physical fitness facility, craft/hobby store, horse fumiture/fumishing store and department store use to exceed the 20,000 square feet limitation for a single commercial use, up to a maximum of 50,000 square feet, for Parcel 1 (92+ acres zoned Bradford Square MPUD) only, and with the overall maximum development limitation of 100,000 square feet of commercial land uses on Parcel 1 to remain; the subject portion of the Subdistrict is located at the northeast comer of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East (TRANSMITTAL HEARING] [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AM Principal Plartner9 ❑ Pebb n CPSP 2010 -2, staff petition requesting amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land U� to: modify the Baystara Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay (B/GTRO); modify FLUE Policy 5.1; modify applicability of the Office and hAl Commercial Subdistrict; update the Wellhead Protection Map; update the FLUM and Map Series to reflect annexations, eta; make FLUM boundary corrections in rural areas; and, add clarity, correct date errors, and make other non - substantive text revisions. (TRANSMITTAL HEAR/W [Coordinator Devid Weeks, A" QMP Manager] u.w Collier County uw Florida fa d CI[ N CPZWI IalaaY IVI,h ' GG tW � Lu era an ar�a S L AN iniarested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment will be made available for inspection at the Land Development Services Dept, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. FloMWM Dr., Naples, between the hours of B-00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, suite 401, Collier County Govemmern Center, East Tarniami Trail, Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents amid be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday, December 16, W10, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at surds meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceadirg, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a parson with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Departrtuhrht, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 -5356, (239) 252-8.'180, at least two days prior to the meeting Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission No. 678178413 Noyembar 3Q 2010 • • U N U'1 IUE Y U BLIU N U'l IUE Y U BLIU N U,Yluh NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on Thursday, December 16, 2010, at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners cham- ber, third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, to consider the Transmittal of the following County Resolution, for Transmittal amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan . The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation on an amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map Series of the Growth Management Plan. The Resolu- tion title is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ORDINANCE 89 -05, AS AMENDED, BY PROVIDING FOR: AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE EL- EMENT'S FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES FOR THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AR- EAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASR'S) MAP, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. D CPSP- 2010 -2, Petition requesting various amendments to the Future Land Collier County Wellhead Protection COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, p� PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRS ONVIF 9K Map. i [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] [Coordinator i _P a•a David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment will be made available for inspection at the Land Development Services Dept., Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Mon- day through Friday. Any questions per- taining to the documents should be di- rected to the Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thurs- day, December 16, 2010, will be read and considered at the public hearing. ' FIB -wT I P I _ ' 1 * o Fca rs� Y any a m /9G E.D .MF.af 2121 If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceed- ings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Com- missioners Office. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission No. 678186778 November 30. 2010 • NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Kim Pokarnev, who on oath says that she serves as the Accounting Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising, being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 1 time in the issue on November 15, 2010 Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication ip the saisLpewspaper. ( Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This 18th day of November, 2010 __� 0JJ f V� an��o (Signature of notary public) ;?ate "Y °Ue`s KAROL E KANGAS . ? Notary Public - State of Florida y o�; My Comm. Expires Jul 29, 2013 .1i, OF W�P�,` Commission # DD 912237 running, the hotel's • dso working. per to the restaurant," n ap.. MEETING gas vac I said November 15.2010 Council will hold a public meeting on )n her record. It just reco.Nth Management Division Conference mater ongful arrest wasn't ce. The Naples man ecutt tion on an amendment to the Future N� )wth Management Plan. The ResolU- Uier Sheriffs Office Fa. ;hts by jailing him The use someone used wori;_ , ;. They didn't erase lic9MMISSIONERS PROPOSING ne, jailed him again scrtFOWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN he lost his job. Day R COUNTY, FLORIDA, ORDI- i his federal lawsuit vide fl: AN AMENDMENT TO THE without admitting the z USE MAP SERIES FOR THE A further litigation menWELLFIELDS AND AQUIFER D4rTHERMORE RECOMMEND - Japles, it took a year stole_ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ce and, by then, he'd agav ing jobs. state with pulling a fire Bi4ments to the Future Land Use . tclub during a Hal- wortncr"uding the map titled Collier ir, dressed as Pamela douilds and ASRs Map. [Coordi -. itch." Defense attor- got S fined alarm company they All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the loon, patrons were Mproposed Growth Management Plan !Amendment will be made available her and the fact that Fifth Avenue South and an hfor inspection at the Land Develop- Services Dept., Comprehensive :tchens. If Planning Section, 2800 N: Horse- ; Irish Pub and Grill, peoFshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours eg and Tracy Wenk 'McCof 8 :00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday uner of fish and chips a bigthrough Friday - Any questions per- . (Shill tzu Yorkie Hctaining to the documents should be Emma sat patiently fronldirected to the Comprehensive Plan - the thing Section. Written comments filed ley weren't affected "Ywith the Clerk to the Board's Office -ause they have their umeprior to Wednesday, December 1, ae, but they did skip Nt2010, will be read and considered at night traditions this adaphe public hearing. torn, f a person decides to appeal any [ay nights we eat out d we did not come Soutdecision recommended by the Envi- it, because we knew hmental Advisory Committee with said respect to any matter considered at oblem and we knew d to eat," said Tracy FlI uch meeting or hearing, he will need' `V3 record of that proceeding, and for wer'uch purpose he may need to ensure ras a way to make up Houhat a verbatim record of the proceed - 'riday, she said. a nitngs is made, which record. includes :, owner of the Inn no phe testimony and evidence upon ibe's Irish Pub and EmGvhich the appeal is to be based. !ve came late Satur- a wt Pumodation in order to participate in this got running was the and vision of certain assistance. Please showers at McCabes' Anent, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail t crisis," said McCabe mert least two days prior to the meeting. hea?liable in the Board of County Com- ;d some pretty happy .akes a difference." Witt on after the water N- gas vac I said November 15.2010 • 0 • UN C NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Advisory Council will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, December 1, 2010, at 9:00 A.M. in the Growth Management Division Conference Rooms 609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation on an amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map Series of the Growth Management Plan. The Resolu- tion title is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ORDI- NANCE 89 -05, AS AMENDED, BY PROVIDING FOR: AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT'S FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES FOR THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASR'S) MAP, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMEND- ING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. ❑ CPSP- 2010 -2, Petition requesting various amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map series including the map titled Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Mao. [Coordi- nator. David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager] COWER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRs pR w� urz on .n'✓x� z— auirru \ C? bte " ase wrz� "r��wc i ',E x ,. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment will be made available for inspection at the Land Develop- ment Services Dept., Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horse- shoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions per- taining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Plan- ning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Wednesday, December 1, 2010, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision recommended by the Envi- ronmental Advisory Committee with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceed- ings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Com- missioners Office. Judith Hushon, Chairman Collier County Environmental Advisory Council No.678188461 November l5 2010 Agenda Item 9.D. • CO 6Y CQVr�t�y STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION /PLANNING AND REGULATION, LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2010 RE: PETITION NO. CPSP- 2010 -2, STAFF PETITION REQUESTING AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager REQUESTED ACTION and STAFF ANALYSIS: This petition consists of several individual staff - initiated text and map amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series. These • amendments were specifically, or generally, authorized by the Board of County Commissioners on September 14, 2010. Most, but not all, of the amendments seek only to add clarity, correct text and map errors and omissions, and provide harmony and internal consistency. However, there are exceptions, including: 1) changes to Policy 5.1 to allow redistribution of use density and intensity; 2) modification of the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict pertaining to its applicability; 3) changes to the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay (B /GTRO) to delete a development standard, add a use, and add clarity regarding applicability of FLUE Policies; and, 4) update the Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Welifields and ASRs Map. Each amendment is identified below with brief explanation /analysis. [Within the proposed amended text, words underlined are added, and words dough are deleted.] Future Land Use Element Text 1. Revise FLUE Policy 5.1 so as to allow, through rezoning, re- distribution of zoning and uses for sites with "non- conforming" zoning districts, including adjacent sites without "non- conforming" zoning, so long as acreages remain the same. This amendment will provide greater development flexibility but will still allow the County to determine appropriateness of allowing that flexibility through the rezone review and hearing processes. There should be no impact upon infrastructure but there will be the potential to result in a better development pattern. Policy 5.1: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been • determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: Agenda Item 9.D. text break d. For property deemed to be consistent with this Element pursuant to one or more of policies 5.9 40 through 5.13, said property may, through a zoning change, be combined and developed with other property, whether such other property is deemed consistent via those same policies or is deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section. Such combination of properties may include re- distribution of zoning districts so long as the acreage for each existing zoning district that is deemed consistent via the referenced policies does not increase. For residential and mixed use developments only, the accumulated density between these properties may be distributed throughout the project, as provided for in the Density Rating System or the Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, as applicable. 2. Revise the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict to allow for its applicability when a proposed rezone site is abutting commercial -zoned property within an Infill Subdistrict if the site also abuts commercial zoning not within an Infill Subdistrict Not doing so results in either that site not qualifying at all for rezone to commercial or that site being limited to (transitional) low intensity commercial zoning - even though that site may abut high intensity commercial zoning within the Infill Subdistrict. There is at least one such instance - a parcel on the south side of Pine Ridge Road abuts commercial zoning within an Activity Center on one side and abuts commercial zoning within an Infill Subdistrict on the other side. Office and In -fill Commercial Subdistrict text break *++++++++++#+++ + *++ + + + + + * + + + * *++ + +++ + +++ + * ++++ The criteria listed below must be met for any project utilizing this Subdistrict. ****+*+++++++++ + + + +++ + + + + + + + +++ +++ + +*+ * * * + ++++ text break 1. For properties zoned commercial pursuant to any of the Infill Subdistricts in the Urban Mixed Use • District or in the Urban Commercial District, said commercial zoning shall not qualify to cause the abutting property(s) to become eligible for commercial zoning under this Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict if said commercial zoning is the only commercial zoning abutting the site for which rezoning is 's sought. 3. Correct a date in the Davis Boulevard /County Barn Road Mixed -Use Subdistrict Davis Boulevard/County Barn Road Mixed -Use Subdistrict ###++++*++*++** + + + + * * + + * + + * * + * * * + * * *+* + + + + * * #+ text break +++*++++*+*+*++ + + + +++++ + * * + ++* + + + +*+ + ++*+ * + * ++ Projects within this Subdistrict shall comply with the following standards and criteria: Commercial Component *******++++++++ + ++*++ + + + + + * + *** + + + + + * * * * + # *##+ text break +++++*++*++*+++ + * * ++++* * + + + + + + + + +++ + + +++* + + * ++ 5. Allowable commercial uses in the commercial component shall be limited to those uses permitted in the C -1, C -2, and C -3 zoning districts as contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended, in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict (Ordinance No. 2005 -25 adopted on 3une 27 June 7, 2005) 4. Modify the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Sending Lands provisions for essential services for proper organization, to specifically list water pumping stations and raw water wells, and to re- letter subparagraphs as necessary. RFMUD Sending Lands ##+*++++******* + + + * * * *** * * * * # * # + + +*##* # + + + + +++ text break*******+*+*** *+ * * + * * + * + *++++ * + +++* * * * * * + * + *+ 7. Permitted Uses: f) Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified in Section 5-aj Ta) through 5-e) Te) such as the fellewing- private wells and septic tanks; nL' ;F sewer- 1: „e, and 1:C s..t:... ,:t,:, . . ADD Co.a:.. T ...om and ,.1, :4• Agenda Item 9.D. • . g) Essential Services as follows, necessary to serve Urban areas or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District: utility lines, except sewer lines; sewer lines and lift stations, only if located within non -NRPA Sending Lands, and only if located within already cleared portions of existing rights -of -way or easements; and, water pumping stations and raw water wells. g) h) Essential Services necessary to ensure public safety. h) �i) Oil and gas exploration. Where practicable, directional - drilling techniques and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native habitats. 5. Modify the Conservation designation provision for essential services for proper organization, to specifically list water pumping stations and raw water wells, to add reference to Urban areas, to re -letter subparagraphs as necessary, and to re- letter the paragraph reference under the conditional uses provision as necessary. Conservation Designation * * * * * * * ** text break�� t.,�.�., * * *� * # * * *, * * * * * * *, « *. The following uses are authorized in this Designation. text break *************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** h. Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified in Section a through g above such as the€eliowinge private wells and septic tanks; utility lines, ept sewer- lines; sewer- 1i"°" And lift ..t, tie fts .,h. if l t° 1 . .;th;., non NRPA !`,-,.atien hands, and „h, if lee t °.1 ith;,, publiely eA%ed ef priva4ely owned eentfal sewef system pfevidi..' te urban areas an&e , , i. Essential Services as follows, necessary to serve Urban areas or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District: utility lines, except sewer lines; sewer lines and lift stations, only if located within non -NRPA Conservation Lands, and only if located within already cleared portions of existing rights -of -way or easements, and if necessary to serve a publicly owned or privately owned central sewer system providing service to urban areas and/or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District; and, water pumping stations and raw water wells necessary to serve a publicly owned or privately owned central watersystem providing service to urban areas and/or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District. i-.j. Essential Services necessary to ensure public safety. t k. Oil extraction and related processing. Where practicable, directional- drilling techniques and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native habitats. The following uses may be permitted as Conditional Uses: a) The following uses are conditionally permitted subject to approval through a public hearing process: (1) Essential services not identified above in Paragraph h.— Li. and �. j_ Within one ... *************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * ** text break *************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * *** * * * ** 6. Make five changes to the B /GTRO, Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. In part, these amendments will aid the Community Redevelopment Agency in their efforts to promote development and redevelopment within the Bays hore/G ateway Triangle area. a. Correct a date. 49 b. Add performing arts center type uses. The proposed use is not listed in the C -1 thru C -3 zoning districts though some theater use(s) is allowed in C -3 by conditional use. Agenda Item 9.D. The BCC has designated the B /GTRO area as a "cultural district" and this use is • appropriate, perhaps necessary, for such a district. The CCPC and BCC should be aware that there is, or may be, a difference in the community theater presently allowed in B /GTRO by C -1 thru C -3 zoning districts vs. that proposed — larger size (visual/bulk impact), greater attendance possible (thus greater traffic impact). Nonetheless, staff supports the use addition. c. Clarify that uses are allowed as provided by FLUE Policies. d. Delete the development standard of feet per story. This is a unique development standard in the FLUE. Deleting it leaves such a determination to the Land Development Code (LDC), or possibly building codes. It may not be appropriate to even have such a standard in the LDC — within the Bayshore Mixed Use District (BMUD) — but if it is in the LDC, then it would be subject to deviation and variance processes such that a case -by- case evaluation would be possible; if the BCC determined it was warrantedfJustified, then they could approve a development order exceeding that standard. One intent of the B /GTRO is to develop at a human scale. The limitation on the number of stories combined with a story height limit serves to cap the total building height. A different way to accomplish this would have been to simply impose a maximum building height in the FLUE, e.g. 50 feet. The same principal as above applies — such a development standard is best located in the LDC where a case -by -case review could allow for an appropriately justified deviation or variance. e. Re -letter subparagraphs as needed to correlate with deletion of the development standard entry. Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay The Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay, depicted on the Future Land Use Map, is within the boundaries of the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Board • of County Commissioners on march 14, 2nnn June 13, 2000. text break 1. Mixed -Use Development: Mix of residential and commercial uses are permitted. For such development, commercial uses are limited to C -1 through C -3 zoning district uses; plats hoteUmotel use; theatrical producers (except motion picture), bands, orchestras, and entertainers; and, uses as may be allowed by applicable FLUE Policies. Mixed -use projects will be pedestrian oriented and are encouraged to provide access (vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle) to nearby residential areas. The intent is to encourage pedestrian use of the commercial area and to provide opportunity for nearby residents to access these commercial uses without traveling onto major roadways. Parking facilities are encouraged to be located in the rear of the buildings with the buildings oriented closer to the major roadway to promote traditional urban development. ** * * * * * * text break 8. To qualify for 12 dwelling units per acre, as provided for in paragraphs #4 and #5 above, mixed use projects within the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay must comply with the following standards: a. Buildings containing only commercial uses are limited to a maximum height of three stories. b. Buildings containing only residential uses are limited to a maximum height of three stories except such buildings are allowed a maximum height of four stories if said residential buildings are located in close proximity to US-41. c. Buildings containing mixed use (residential uses over commercial uses) are limited to a maximum height of four stories. d. Hotels /motels will be limited to a maximum height of four stories. For- this Over-lay, building be to 14 feet in e. pufpeses ef eaeh stei-J, ma�, tip . e. For mixed -use buildings, commercial uses are permitted on the first two stories only. • 4 Agenda Item 9.D. g. f. Each building containing commercial uses only is limited to a maximum building footprint • of 20,000 square feet gross floor area. h: g. One or more zoning overlays may be adopted which may include more restrictive standards than listed above in Paragraphs a--g as =f. 7. Correct an omission by adding the missing FLUE Policy reference. The hard copy FLUE text already includes this Policy reference - and others; however, the policy reference was not adopted, and the other policy references were not adopted and they do not correlate with the Properties Consistent By Policy Map. FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES text break Properties Consistent By Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12) Future Land Use Map and Map Series 1. Future Land Use Map (countywide). a. Expand Incorporated Areas to reflect City of Naples annexations of the Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road and north of the Naples Airport (35 -49- 25); a portion of the Wilderness Country Club PUD commercial tract, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road and north of Freedom Park (27- 49 -25); and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway opposite Freedom Park and on the west side of the Gordon River (27- 49 -25). b. Correct South Golden Gate Estates NRPA (Natural Resource Protection Area) boundary at US41, Port of the Islands and at 1 -75: shift boundary north so it follows 1 -75, follows • US41, and follows the south line of Sections 33, 34, 35, Township 51 South, Range 28 East (so is no longer over Port of the Islands Urban area). c. Correct Agricultural /Rural boundary near US41 /CR29 /Everglades City: shift boundary to west to run along CR29, to follow ACSC (Area of Critical State Concern) boundary, and to follow west Section line of Sections 28 & 33, Township 52 South, Range 29 East; and, shift boundary to south to follow US41. d. Correct Agricultural /Rural -Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay- Conservation boundary along CR850, northwest of Immokalee: remove jog along common line for Sections 8 & 9, Township 46 South, Range 28 East - from near southeast corner of Section 7 — so that boundary runs along CR850 to the northeast. e. In map legend, add Interchange symbol under Overlays and Special Features and label: "Interchange." 2. Activity Center Index Map. Revise Activity Center #18 boundary to match the boundary on Activity Center #18 Map, to reflect prior expansion in southeast quadrant. Revise Activity Center #14 boundary to reflect City of Naples annexation of the Bridges at Gordon River project, in southeast quadrant. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road and north of Wilderness Country Club PUD (22- 49 -25); and, Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road (35- 49 -25). 3. All Activity Center Maps. Revise to update underlying map features — zoning, lot/parcel creation, street names, etc. — and to reflect parcel development and generalized building footprints. • 4. Activity Center #12 Map. 5 Agenda Item 9.D. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Moorings Park, on • east side of Goodlette -Frank Road and north of Solana Road /Burning Tree Drive (15- 49 -25); and, a church zoned RSF-4, on south side of Seagate Drive and west of Seagate Elementary School (16- 49 -25). 5. Activity Center #14 Map. Revise Activity Center #14 boundary to reflect City of Naples annexation of the Bridges at Gordon River project, in southeast quadrant. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexation of a portion of Wilderness Country Club PUD commercial tract, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road. 6. Map FLUE -10, Consistent by Policy Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway; a church zoned RSF-4, on south side of Seagate Drive; Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; and, Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road. 7. Rivers and Floodplains Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. 8. Estuarine Bays Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of • Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. 9. Soils Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. 10. Existing Commercial Mineral Extraction Sites Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. 11. Stewardship Overlay Map. Amend to add additional approved Stewardship Sending Areas (SSAs 10 -15), as required by Policy 1.6 of the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, and to correct the boundaries of SSA 7. 12. Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map Replace existing map with proposed map based upon the latest hydrologic modeling report (prepared by the Collier County Pollution Control and Prevention Department), as required by Objective 1 of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element and subsequent policies, and Objective 3.3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and subsequent policies. More explanation is provided in the attached Staff Report to the • EAC for their December 1, 2010 meeting. The hydrologic modeling report is also attached. 2 0 As required by CCME Policy 3.3.2, public notice specific to this map was provided prior to the EAC and CCPC meetings, and will be provided prior to the BCC meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: Only the proposed amendment to the Wellhead Protection Map is germane to the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). The EAC heard that amendment at their December 1, 2010 meeting. Their recommendation will be presented at the CCPC hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP- 2010 -2 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. j� 3- Prepared By: � `' ✓tom -- Date: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager Comprehensive Planning Section, Land Development Services Department Reviewed By: �i�' Date: Michael Bosi, AI P, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Section, Land Development Services Department Reviewed By: Date: / Z - v * lam D. Loren Jr., P.E , Director Land Development Services Department Approved By Date: Nick Casa languida, eputy Administrator Growth Management Division /Planning & Regulation Petition Number. CPSP - 2010 -2 Staff Report for December 16, 2010 CPCC meeting NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the February 22, 2011 BCC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, CHAIRMAN CPSP- 2010 -2 CCPC Transmittal Staff Report dw 11 -30-10 G:IComprehensivelCOMP PLANNING GMP DATA1Comp Plan Arrendments12009 -2010 Combined Cydes petibons12010 Cyde PetttionsICPSP- 2010 -2 batehICCPC Transmittal dw /11 -30-10 • 7 • ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Item VII.B. STAFF REPORT MEETING OF December 1, 2010 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: CPSP- 2010 -2 Petition Name: Various Amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Maps in the GMP - Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map ONLY (Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment initiated by the Collier County Pollution Control and Prevention Department) [Transmittal hearing] Applicant: Collier County II. LOCATION: This petition does not pertain to a specific property. • M. BACKGROUND and PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), Objective 1 of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element (NGWAR) and subsequent policies, and Objective 3.3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and subsequent policies, requires the County to maintain maps of potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to contamination from nearby development activities and other activities and conditions. Every two years, the County is to revise and update its three- dimensional computer models, based upon a variety of data, and revise wellfield maps, as necessary. In the GMP, there is a single map in the Future Land Use Element known as the Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map that is part of the Future Land Use Map series. Section 3.06.00 of the Land Development Code (LDC) contains "wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone maps," maps that are similar to, but with greater detail than, the map in the Future Land Use Element. Similar to the GMP, the LDC requires review of the wellfield maps, but on an annual basis. The biennial process in the GMP consists of updating the computer model, then, if warranted, revising the map in the Future Land Use Element. Subsequently, any affected map(s) in the LDC would need to be amended. Since the LDC includes regulatory provisions, it is important to amend the LDC map(s) as soon as possible • after the GMP map has been amended. • EAC Meeting 12/1/10 The attached 33 -page report provides the technical basis for the proposed map amendment; a similar report was used to support such map amendments in 2007, and in other prior years. The proposed Wellfields map itself is located on page 6; the summary of map changes (affected wellfields) is identified on pages 4 and 5. Also, attached is the existing Wellfields map. The proposed amendment is technical in nature and is based upon the sound science of the computer modeling; it has no impact upon public infrastructure or surrounding properties (though properties newly added to a protection zone would be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny). Consideration of this proposed amendment at this EAC meeting was duly advertised in the Naples Daily News as required by CCME Policy 3.3.2. IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: This is a proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map series. It is required to be periodically revised, as necessary, pursuant to Objective 1 of the NGWAR and subsequent policies, and Objective 3.3 of the CCME and subsequent policies. V. RECOMMENDATION: That the EAC recommend approval of petition CPSP -20l 0 -2, proposed amendment • to the Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map. PREPARED BY: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager Comprehensive Planning Section, Land Development Services Dept. REVIEWED BY: William D. Lorenz.-Jr., P.E., Director Land Development Services Department W /Nick Casalanglfi'da, Duty Administrator Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation Date Date ;/_ it- _ /C Date EAC Staff Report Transmittal CPSP - 2010 -2 batch petition - FLU Wellhead Map only G:1ComprehensivelCOMP PLANNING GMP DATA1Comp Plan Amendments12009 -2010 Combined Cycles petitions2010 Cycle PetitionslCPSP- 2010-2 batchlEAC Transmittal dw /11 -15-10 U • Co Ter County Public Utilities Division Pollution Control GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT - 2010 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT MAP OF COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS, AND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY WELLS NOVEMBER, 2010 GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfleld Protection Report V5 11- 15- 10.docx Page 1 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE SUMMARY............................................................................ ............................... 3 1. AMENDMENT REQUEST .................................................. ............................... 4 2. HISTORICAL WELLFIELD PROTECTION MODELING IN COLLIER COUNTY......... 7 2.1 INITIATION OF MODELING IN 1989 ............................ ............................... 7 2.2 MODELING OF 2003 .................................................... ............................... 9 2.3 MODELING OF 2004 .................................................. ............................... 13 2.4 MODELING OF 2007 ................................................. ............................... 13 3. MODELING OF 2010 LEADING TO 2010 LDC AMENDMENT REQUEST ................. 15 3.1 STAKEHOLDERS .................................................... ............................... 15 3.2 METHODS ............................................................. ............................... 15 3.3 RESULTS ................................................................ ............................... 15 4. REFERENCES ................................................................ ............................... 16 APPENDIX A. TABLE OF OWNERS AND STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE 2010 WELLFIELD PROTECTION ZONE MODELING ....................................... ............................... 19 B. 2010 WELLFIELD MODELING DATA .................................. ............................... 21 1. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP IN THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN...... 6 GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfleld Protection Report P75 11-15-10.docx Pagge 2 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper • • • SUMMARY The Collier County Pollution Control and Prevention Department (PCD) is responsible for protecting the potable groundwater resources of Collier County under the Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.06.00, titled "Groundwater Protection." This Section of the LDC relates to public water supply wellfields permitted to withdraw a minimum of 100,000 gallons per day of groundwater from the topmost "surficial" and next lower "intermediate" freshwater aquifer systems of the county. In addition, the PCD is responsible under Section 9J -5.006 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC), relating to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, to update and make input to the county's future land use maps when appropriate. A recent review and modeling of the municipal water supply wellfields within Collier County indicated that the existing 2007 approved "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields, and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells (ASR's) Map" (Map) requires updating. This proposed amendment to the 2007 version will update the Map so it reflects more closely what presently exists in Collier County. • In summary, there are eight major municipal wellfields currently falling under LDC Section 3.06.00. Due to recent modifications, either to the number of wells in a field or to the permitted well pumpage rates, very minor changes are required to the computer generated shapes of the wellfield protection zones for all eight wellfields. The latest shapes of these wellfield risk management special treatment protection zones are shown on Map 1. In addition the installation three new shallow water supply wells at Port of the Islands, has resulted in this wellfield being added to the Map. is Map 1 also shows the currently approved potential future wellfield areas and the permitted ASR wells within the county, as required by FAC Section 9J- 5.006. The purpose of this Paper is to present and describe the current conditions found within the proposed Future Land Use Map as pertaining to freshwater wellfields and ASR's, and to request the appropriate committees and bodies accept and approve inclusion of the revisions into the future Land Use Map for use in the Growth Management Plan for Collier County. GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfield Protection Report V5 11-15-10. docx Page 3 of 33 Grotirth Management Plan Paper • 1. AMENDMENT REQUEST The PCD is pursuing an amendment to the "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields, and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells (ASR's) Map" (Map) located within the Collier County Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element. This proposed amendment will update this Map so it more closely reflects what presently exists in Collier County. Through this process the public will be informed by Public Notices, and will have an opportunity to share their opinions and thoughts during public hearings held by the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and, finally, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC), where the proposed amendment will be considered for adoption. If this amendment is approved, it will then be forwarded to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review to determine compliance with Florida Statutes. Following this process the PCD will then pursue the amendment of Collier County's LDC Section 3.06.00 "Groundwater Protection" to ensure the outdated wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones are revised to reflect what presently exists. The purpose and intent of LDC Section 3.06.00 is to protect future and existing public water supply wellfields, protect natural aquifer system recharge areas, protect countywide ground water resources, and protect the public and resources from potential pollutant point sources. This regulation requires that the public water supply wellfields within the county are protected by means of "wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones" commonly known as Wellfield Protection Zones. These zones are derived from a three- dimensional computer - modeled analysis of ground water and solute transport in the • county's freshwater aquifer system. This modeling has been done by the PCD since 1989. Following the initial setup of the model by a consultant in 1989, the model was run in 1991, 2003, 2004, 2007 and, most recently, in 2010. Each run of the model produced changes to the previous run results because of the input of new data and revised, increasingly stringent, wellfield permit conditions imposed by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) (i.e., wellfield changes that occurred since the previous run of the model). The proposed map, "Map 1," reflects the results of the 2010 modeling. The reference statutory Geographic Information System (GIS) map of the Wellfield Protection Zones for each wellfield resides in the county's GIS map library. Shown below is a summary of the historic wellfield updates and hence modeling changes between 2004, 2007, and 2010. Wellfield 2004 Modeling 2007 Modeling 2010 Modeling Immokalee 13 wells 13 wells - no change 16 wells — 3 new wells Orangetree 2 wells 4 wells — 2 new wells 4 wells — changed pumping Ave Maria Utility Co. 0 wells 6 new wells 6 wells — changed pumping Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) Golden Gate City 8 wells 8 wells - greater pumping 8 wells — changed pumping Everglades City 3 wells 3 wells — no change 3wells — changed pumping GMPpaper 2010 - Weloeld Protection Report Y511- 15- 10.docx Page 4 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper • Wellfield 2004 Modeling 2007 Modeling 2010 Modeling Collier County Utilities (Golden Gate) 32 wells 34 wells - 2 new wells & greater pumping 36 wells — 2 new wells City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) 26 wells 26 wells — no change 31 wells — 5 new wells City of Naples (East Golden Gate) 23 wells 23 wells — no change 23 wells — changed pumping Port of the Islands Not modeled Not modeled 3 new shallow wells The impact of these changes, in either the number of wells or the pumping rate of the wells in a particular wellfield, typically reflects in a change to the Wellfield Protection Zone shapes. Some of the shape changes, especially in large wellfields with many wells, are essentially very minor — and this is the case for the Immokalee, Everglades City, Collier County (Golden Gate), City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) and City of Naples (East Golden Gate) wellfields. However, for the small Ave Maria, Orangetree, and FGUA (Golden Gate) wellfields, the changed permitted pumping rates applied in the 2010 model have, in each case, resulted in a noticeable change to the Wellfield Protection Zone shapes. Map 1 presents and the PCD requests adoption of the actual results of the 2010 modeling — whether the Wellfield Protection Zone shape change was small or large. As required by Section 9J -5.006 of the FAC relating to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth • Management Plan, also shown in Map 1 are the locations of approved potential future wellfield areas, planned surficial aquifer supply wells, and the SFWMD - permitted ASR wells in the county. �J The potential future wellfield areas and the planned surficial aquifer supply wells shown on Map 1 are extracted from Figure 5 -lof the 10 -Year Water Supply Work Plan. The original approval of this potential future wellfield area resulted when the BCC approved a comprehensive plan amendment to adopt the 10 -Year Water Supply Work Plan on February 24, 2009, by Ordinance No. 09 -04 (DCA 09- RWSPI). The ASR's shown on Map 1 are those documented as having received SFWMD ASR Permits within the county. The Map shows four sites at which ASR well permits have been issued to county wellfield stakeholders: Marco Island (9 Wells), City of Naples (4 Wells), Manatee Road (1 Well), and Livingston Road (1 Irrigation Quality Well). The Carica Road ASR shown in the 2007 Map is withdrawn because following completion of a test well at the site no ASR was installed. The following Sections and Appendices provide supplementary details of the proposed and historic amendments, an explanation and intent of the model, the stakeholders who were contacted, and the wellfield data collected during this consultative process. The PCD requests the adoption of Map 1 as the Future Land Use Map relating to the wellfield protection areas, proposed surficial aquifer wells, and current ASR's for incorporation into the Growth Management Plan of Collier County. GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfield Protection Report 1311- 15- 10.docx Page 5 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper MAP 1. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP IN THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PE7MON GF = =S'tit COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED VVELLFIELDS AND ASRs os QTY OF t.AyLES rt COASTAL -rE YdiLFlELD i aTY uF LA. LEs Asp A AELL �E2M1 u ^CS -mt. rl t ! ! js C CR FAE 1 1 L) PINE • • CCLL� �E uTI rnu COU S. �F Y AY I I (" QLFlELC SR 84 y ELCfIcA :;.:'.�E�v►AENTAL LTILITY AUTHCR Y SOLCEN . GATE TTY NELIFIELD AMSDAM - 90-lEMBUt Yd. Na =3 A uEQED _ .iAf4I.,3RV 25„ 1W7 Ord %e 2-X7 -18 AMER7Eb - DE rHEw 4, 7001 Ord. Nn 2.M. -n U �°rMEi eT. �rx ea4'PIr6 �."R:t 9:+1rn1 M"AWMEYT 7114" I °LAW44C AND RC2.LA71rl :$MLLE+ (11DIw Y o!U.IO m OTlR4OL NQ PKW 710. AFT "IE- 91231C nLE tFr, -,t<= :,im 1 _ IMIdptALEE � �L;1 MTILFlELD I � r CR X46 I� /'/ AVE kAR A ' �Fdi4GETFEE / WELIFIELD IN4 L -CTENTIAL F_TL;E j! /1A�1 COLLIER CO-NTY *ELLFlELA AREA i t 1 ! CJTY OF i.A:'1LES EtiT mLREN GATE AELLF1ELD 10 J m Ln W b V i� 7 W 'ZtT OF TILE ISLA4C£ WEL.FIELD i Its i :IL"'yD WATER Su=='Llr WELLS yj AcR - AOJIFER STORAGE AN:) REC- -l.0 y SITE ®PCTE4TIAL riT_IRE +EL.LFEL• 1.3E1 *ULFlEL3 AREA. i DdE9MkXS dTY WELLFIELD ! GMPpaper 2010 - 9 ellfield Protection Report T75 11-15- 10. docx Page 6 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper 0 � 0 � • i t 1 ! CJTY OF i.A:'1LES EtiT mLREN GATE AELLF1ELD 10 J m Ln W b V i� 7 W 'ZtT OF TILE ISLA4C£ WEL.FIELD i Its i :IL"'yD WATER Su=='Llr WELLS yj AcR - AOJIFER STORAGE AN:) REC- -l.0 y SITE ®PCTE4TIAL riT_IRE +EL.LFEL• 1.3E1 *ULFlEL3 AREA. i DdE9MkXS dTY WELLFIELD ! GMPpaper 2010 - 9 ellfield Protection Report T75 11-15- 10. docx Page 6 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper 0 � 0 � • i DdE9MkXS dTY WELLFIELD ! GMPpaper 2010 - 9 ellfield Protection Report T75 11-15- 10. docx Page 6 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper 0 � 0 � • 2. HISTORICAL WELLFIELD PROTECTION MODELING IN COLLIER COUNTY • 2.1 INITIATION OF MODELING IN 1989 The following are extracted portions from the 1989 and 1991 reports that described the initial motives, directives, setup and running of a wellfield protection zone model in Collier County. Some of the concepts and opinions expressed at that time may not be valid now or may have been overtaken by events; they are provided to record the development of this modeling within the county. Chapter 163.3203, FS, mandates the adoption of Land Development Regulations that "...provide for protection of potable water wellfields ". The Collier County Growth Management Plan translates this mandate into a series of Goals, Objectives, and Policies for implementation of ground water quality protection in Collier County. The goals state that the County shall: (1) identify and protect natural ground water aquifer recharge areas from activities that could degrade and/or contaminate the quality of ground water; (2) protect natural ground water aquifer recharge areas from activities that unacceptably alter the ground water recharge; (3) protect the County's groundwater resources to ensure the highest water quality practical; and (4) conserve, protect, and appropriately manage the County's fresh water resources. Objectives and Policies included in these goals are: (1) to develop and maintain a 3- dimensional computer ground water flow model for existing and planned wellfields; (2) to amend the Comprehensive Plan to include modeled areas as "environmentally sensitive areas "; (3) to develop • an ordinance to provide for an appropriate level of protection for all Collier County ground water; (4) to develop an ordinance(s) that will address well construction, rock mining and excavation, blasting, and confining units; (5) to develop an- ordinance that will address both existing and future land use and surface activities relative to petroleum storage tanks, stormwater, regulated substances, industrial and domestic wastes; (6) to develop a ground water protection ordinance to protect existing and future wellfields; and (7) to develop technical criteria for determining what areas are critical to the County's long -term ground water needs, e.g., Natural Aquifer Recharge areas. The citizens of Collier County derive their potable water largely from the Surficial Aquifer System via either the permitted public water supply wellfields or the private and household water wells. Rater consumption from these sources are divided into three main use areas; potable water, agricultural use, and recreational uses. The Surficial Aquifer System in Collier County is composed of the unconfined water table aquifer and the underlying, semi - confined Lower Tamiami Aquifer, both of which are recharged by direct infiltration ofprecipitation that accumulates on the surface. The water table of this aquifer system lies at or within a very few feet of the ground surface, being visible in such situations as canals, ponds and lakes, wetland areas, and wet retention stormwater areas. The unsaturated soil or rock above the water table is commonly only a few inches to a few feet thick and provides little attenuation of most contaminants or pollutants passing from the surface downward to the water table. Thus, the Surficial Aquifer System is very susceptible to contamination resulting from land • use activities. The sedimentary rock units underlying Collier County represent several millions of years of mixed carbonate and siliciclastic marine shelf and coastal deposition under subtropical to tropical GMPpaper 2010 - Weloeld Protection Report ti511- 15- 10.docx Page 7 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper climatic conditions. These rock units exhibit generally unpredictable vertical and lateral • microlithologic as well as permeability and porosity variations with some generally recognized laterally extensive zones of relatively low permeability separating other zones of relatively high permeability. These latter zones or aquifers contain producible water and are separated by zones of lower permeability, i.e., aquitards. Nearly all of the potable water in Collier County is obtained from two permeable zones of the Surficial Aquifer System. This System is unconfined and is recharged directly from the surface. Hence, accurate knowledge of ground water flow directions and recharge characteristics is extremely important when attempting to predict ground water movement. Potential ground water contaminants from land use activities are introduced into aquifer systems via moving water. This movement may be in vertical and/or lateral directions. The conventional wisdom is that with increasing distance traveled in heterogeneous soils /rocks, the more attenuated or "diluted" a pollutant will become. However, even extremely minute amounts of some contaminants have high toxicity levels. Natural attenuation processes include filtration, sorption, chemical processes, dilution, and microbiological decomposition. The thin, sandy soils of Collier County are less capable of providing extensive natural attenuation of many pollutants generated by land use activities as compared to thicker, more heterogeneous soils. Hence, contaminant- generating land use activities should be regulated in order to reduce the potential for introduction of pollutants into the ground water system. Potential ground water contaminants are as numerous and as varied as the land use activities that produce them. In addition, each contaminant (e.g., bacteria, dissolved solids, petroleum products, ispesticides, fertilizers, septic or sewage waste) behaves differently in the water system in terms of its residence time, movement with other pore fluids, reactivity with or to pore fluids and soil /rock, and reactivity to /with other chemicals within the aquifer system. Because of the lack of a complete understanding of contaminant behavior in the aquifer system, combined with only a very general knowledge of local soil /rock characteristics affecting this behavior, it is difficult to predict with a high degree of certainty exactly how far or in what direction a particular contaminant will travel in a given time. Numerous studies have been conducted in attempts to estimate travel characteristics, travel times, and residence times of commonly introduced contaminants in aquifer systems. Because of the inhomogeneity of the soil /rock and aquifer systems, most of these estimates provide either ranges of values for velocity, distance, and residence time for the contaminants or present some minimum setback distances based on risk potential to human health and welfare. Hence, rate, distance and longevity of contaminant data for an aquifer system should be recognized as a range of values when considered in the light of risk analysis. In order to develop an effective ground water protection program, an effort must be made to establish a minimum County—wide water quality baseline applicable to all potable water wells and against which to compare suspected contaminated areas. In addition, areas around public water supply wellfields should be provided protection in the form of land use restrictions and prohibitions. The extent of such areas should be predicated on geologic and hydrogeologic data as well as knowledge of the behavior of contaminants in these systems. Wellfield protection zones are in reality risk management zones. Such zones must be based on the • best available regional and local geologic and hydrogeologic information; historic and projected water demands; evaluation of contaminant behavior in the ground water systems; natural attenuation processes; remediation time and technology; and establishment of specific contaminant targets and thresholds. Computer models can evaluate data and generate projections of ground GMPpaper 2010 - Weloeld Protection Report i3 11- 15- 10.docx Page 8 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper water flow, contaminant travel, and drawdown characteristics within some confidence limits, but it • still remains a policy decision of "how much risk is too much risk ". The three - dimensional ground water flow model for wellfields employed as a predictor in this study was programmed with a 20 year planning horizon. Input such as that mentioned above was then used to define a 20 year risk management zone around each public water supply wellfield. All ground water within this zone has the potential to reach the wellhead within 20 years, and numerous pathways were modeled to illustrate this. Within this zone, three additional zones were established. Zone 1 is defined as that area closest to the wellhead which contains five percent of the total ground water within the 20 year planning zone that will generally reach the wellhead within one year. The rationale for this zone is one of sanitary hazard versus natural attenuation and risk limits for most contaminants related to sanitary systems. Zone 2 is defined as that area closest to the wellhead, but outside of Zone 1, that contains ten percent of the total ground water within the 20 year planning zone. The model indicates that water in this zone will generally reach the wellhead within 2 years. The establishment of zones 2 and 3 is predicated on travel times, natural attenuation, and remediation time concerns for contaminants in the regulated or hazardous products and wastes categories. Zone -3 is defined as that area within the 20 year planning horizon in which 25 percent of the ground water will reach the wellhead within approximately jive years. Zone 4 is defined as the remainder of the 20 year planning zone and is the immediate Zone of Contribution for these wellfields within the planning horizon time frame. Significant contamination of ground water has occurred in every state of this nation, and is being detected with increasing frequency in urban and rural areas; in industrial as well as in agricultural • regions, and is adversely effecting development and quality of life in many regions of the world (e.g., Love Canal). In Collier County, the water table is generally within six feet of the surface and the main potable water aquifers are recharged from infiltration through thin soils and semi - consolidated rock units. Natural attenuation of contaminants is not as effective as in other areas where there are thick soil horizons and the where the water table lies deeper beneath the surface. In addition, development in Collier County exposes the water table directly to land use pollutants via quarries, landscaping, stormwater retention/detention systems, accidental /incidental surficial pollution and poorly constructed and maintained wells. The only long term approach to maintaining an acceptable level of ground water quality is to reduce the possibilities for ground water contamination rather than to depend on remediation. This approach must be based on the acquisition and analysis of accurate hydrologic and geologic data, understanding of the nature and reactions of contaminants in the ground water system, knowledge of background water quality levels, and realistic projections offuture demands. From this data can be developed a comprehensive ground water protection program that addresses overall water quality across the County as well as that in the zones of contribution for public water supply wellfields. 2.2 MODELING OF 2003 The purpose of the 2003 modeling and reporting by the PCD's consultant, Dr. M.L. Voorhees, was to update the methodologies and results of the initial Collier County regional three- dimensional • ground water flow model, and the subsequent wellfield submodel transport simulations performed by Voorhees et al, August 1989. The 2003 report describes an updated computer model of the aquifer system in Collier County, Florida, with a concentration on the simulation of wellfield GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfleld Protection Report V5 11- 15- IO.docx Page 9 of 33 Grox th Management Plan Paper protection areas and efforts in the determination of wellfield protection regions. The following is largely extracted from the Voorhees 2003 report. • The purpose of the 2003 Voorhees investigation in Collier County was as follows: (1) To update a wellfield protection computer model of the aquifer system in Collier County; (2) To describe the effects of future ground water withdrawals on ground water flow in the vicinity of each study wellfields; (3) To describe the one (1), two (2), five (5), and twenty (20) -year diversion area (i.e., protection zones or travel times) associated with the annual permitted allocation rate for each study wellfleld; and (4) Provide extensive software development and training on this software to enable County staff the ability to update wellfield protection zones frequently. The diversion area is defined as the area, in plan view, through which ground water moves within the aquifer system to a production well in a prescribed number of years. All analyses were performed assuming steady -state conditions. The term "Study Area," as it was used in this 2003 report, refers to a 2,220 square -mile area included in the model and enclosed by the regional model grid. In addition, seven separate study wellfields were investigated as follows: City of Naples (East Golden Gate) — SFWMD Permit No. 1100018W; City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) — SFWMD Permit No. 1100017W; Collier County Utilities — SFWMD Permit No. I I00249W; hnmokalee — SFWMD Permit No. 1100013W; • Florida Cities Utilities (now Florida Governmental Utility Authority) — SFWMD Permit No. 1100148W; Everglades City — SFWMD Permit No. 1100160W; and Orangetree — SFWMD Permit No. I I00419W. The extent of the 2,220 square -mile study area encompasses approximately the western two thirds of Collier County, the southern third of Lee County, and a small part of southern Hendry County in south Florida. The north boundary divides the topographic high about 7 miles north of Lake Trafford. The south boundary is south of the major portion of Lower Tamiami Canal. The east boundary is located far east in Big Cypress Swamp to minimize boundary effects on regional flow. The west boundary is the Gulf of Mexico. An extensive general description of the study area hydrogeology is provided by Knapp et al, 1986, Bennett, 1992, and Voorhees et al, 1989. The reader should review Voorhees et al, 1989, Section 3, and Bennett, 1992 for details associated with hydrogeologic data for the study area. The rock units from which most potable water is withdrawn in Collier County are grouped according to previously defined stratigraphic units and by their hydraulic properties. The sources of geologic and hydrologic data for Collier County, Florida as used in the model to the present are as follows: • GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfield Protection Report V5 Page 10 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper Information Source • Canal system Collier County U.S. Geological Survey Bennett, 1992 Geologic structure Knapp et al, 1986 Lee County study (Voorhees et al, 1988) Bennett, 1992 Hydraulic aquifer Knapp et al, 1986 characteristics Lee County study (Voorhees et al, 1988) Collier County County utilities Bennett, 1992 Canal topology U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps Municipal pumping well Collier County topology South Florida Water Management District Burns and Shih, 1984 Knapp et al, 1986 County utilities is Municipal wellfeld South Florida Water Management District pumpages Collier County Knapp et al, 1986 County utilities Agricultural pumpage Knapp et al, 1986 Collier County Collier County Agricultural Extension South Florida Water Management District Hydrologic investigations Knapp et al, 1986 Burns and Shih, 1984 Jacob, 1983 Gee & Jensen, 1980 Swayze and McPherson, 1977 Bennett et al, 1992 Voorhees et al, August 1989 Calibration of the ground water model is critically important to modeling studies such as being described. For the 2003 modeling work the regional model calibration was performed by combining the calibration results from reports from Voorhees et al, 1989 and Bennett, April 1992 (SFWMD). Voorhees et al, 1989 calibrated a regional model to a course grid and used the regional model to • establish boundary conditions for several wellfield submodels. The technique of computerized optimization was used to achieve calibration. Bennett, April 1992 used a coarse grid in manually calibrating a regional model, which extended in depth vertically to the Hawthorn aquifer. By GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfield Protection Report T5 11-15-10. docx Page 11 of 33 Groff th .Management Plan Paper combining the calibrated parameters from these two studies and performing detailed grid optimization to place model nodes as close as possible near wells in a single regional model, the • original Voorhees et al, 1989 study with wellfield submodels has now been replaced with a single regional model. This provided a unified, streamlined, and easier wellfield protection modeling update procedure for Collier County staff. The deeper Hawthorn aquifer is now included in this model, which is an update as it was not part of the 1989 study, and as in the SFWMD model, the Hawthorn aquifer is configured as a fixed head boundary condition. Due to artesian conditions and extensive confining units above the Hawthorn aquifer, pumpage in the Hawthorn is assumed to not require wellfield protection analysis. The theory associated with the delineation of wellfield protection zones is presented by Voorhees et al, 1989; Section 5 p29, and Section 11 p85. The reader is referred to that discussion for details of the procedure. The only departure in 2003 from that documented procedure is the initial placement of travel time particles at a production well over the entire producing aquifer, vertically. In the prior study by Voorhees et al, 1989 particles were placed at the vertical midpoint of the producing aquifer. The result of this procedural enhancement has been made possible by the availability of more accurate travel time delineation and more powerful computing resources. Running of the model and hence delineation of the wellfield protection zones can be determined very easily by data entry of a few values that include the following: (1) an exactly two character wellfield identifier for the well -- user selected; (2) an exactly three character well identifier -- user selected; (3) the SFWMD permitted wellfield average annual allocation in MGD for the well -- obtained from • utilities with confirmation from SFWMD; (4) the NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar well coordinates in feet for the well -- based on GPS measurement by County or utility staff, (5) the aquifer from which the well pumps -- obtained from utilities; (6) the well pump capacity in GPM -- obtained from utilities with confirmation from SFWMD; and (7) comment regarding the well -- user selected. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The wellfield protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where: Qi = Qwa(Qci/EiQci) /1440 (Eq 1) Qi is the wellfield protection pumpage for well in gallons per minute (GPM); Qwa is the SFWMD permitted wellfield average annual allocation in Millions of Gallons per Day (MGD); Qci is the pump capacity of well in the wellfield, gallons per minute (GPM); and EiQci is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. • GMPpaper 2010 - k'ellfield Protection Report 1511- 15- 10.docz Page 12 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper For this study these data were obtained from the various utilities by County staff and are presented • in Appendix `B" with cross - references to the numbered items (1) through (7) listed above. For all wellfield protection simulations a conservative transport porosity of 0.15 was used to generate all ground water flow path lines. The methodologies used in the 2003 study are consistent with those previously applied by Voorhees et al, 1989 and the guidelines published for determination of wellhead protection areas (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1987). The use of wellfield protection zones provides a consistent planning tool for the County and the extensive software development performed for the project provides a user - friendly system for County staff to update and change wellfield protection areas. Significant improvement of computational resources since the Voorhees et al, 1989 study provided improved accuracy for the determination of wellfield protection areas based on three dimensional ground water flow and the development of an integrated system which is more accessible by County staff. 23 MODELING OF 2004 The wellfield protection modeling undertaken in 2004 was carried out by Collier County staff, primarily Mr. Michael Lucas, Environmental Specialist. This modeling followed the methods described above and set up at that time on the county computers by the PCD's consultant, Dr. M.L.Voorhees. The data collection phase of the work took place between approximately May and September 2004, and the computer modeling was completed by November 2004. • As described above the specially designed program suite comprises two linked computer codes: - a hydrogeological model, and - a freeware CAD program called IntelliCAD (a clone of AutoCAD). The wellfields covered in the 2004 modeling exercise included: Immokalee Wellfield Orangetree Wellfield Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City Wellfield Everglades City Wellfield Collier County Utilities Wellfield - Golden Gate Wellfield City of Naples - East Golden Gate Wellfield City of Naples - Coastal Ridge Wellfield The results of the modeling provided the LDC required W -1, W -2, W -3, and W -4 protection zones for each wellfield. These zones were included in Collier County Ordinance No. 05 -27 as Sub Section 3.0. Amendments to Section 3.06.06 Regulated Wellfields. 2.4 MODELING OF 2007 The necessary raw data for the 2007 modeling exercise was gathered from the public water supply • wellfield owners and stakeholders in October and November 2006. The wellfield protection modeling undertaken in 2007 was carried out by PCD staff member Dr. Alister Burnett, Environmental Specialist. GMPpaper 2010 - Well6eld Protection Report V511- 15- 10.docx Page 13 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper The wellfields modeled in 2007 included: Immokalee Wellfield Orangetree Wellfield Ave Maria Utility Co. Wellfield City of Naples - Coastal Ridge Wellfield Everglades City Wellfield Collier County Utilities Wellfield City of Naples - East Golden Gate Wellfield Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City Wellfield For the Everglades City Wellfield where there was no change in the input data from that used in 2004, the 2007 modeling resulted in exactly the same time path flowlines and, hence, the same one, two, five, and twenty year special treatment overlay Wellfield Protection Zones as the 2004 model. For the extensive City of Naples Coastal Ridge and East Golden Gate Wellfields, and the Immokalee Wellfield, although minor model input changes were applied because of minor well or pumping changes, the resulting Wellfield Protection Zones are unchanged from the 2004 modeling. For wellfields with new or significantly altered input data, new timeline flow path shapes files were generated resulting in new one, two, five, and twenty year Wellfield Protection Zones. This was the case for the Orangetree Wellfield, FGUA (Golden Gate) Wellfield, and Collier County Golden Gate Wellfield. • The entirely new Ave Maria Wellfield input data was compiled and applied to the model, which then generated new one, two, five, and twenty year timelines; i.e., special treatment overlay • Wellfield Protection Zones ST /W -1, ST/W -2, ST/W -3, and ST/W -4. A summary of the changes between the 2004 and 2007 modeling, which gave rise to the previous request for Amendments to the "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map" located within the Collier County Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element, are listed below. Wellfield 2004 Modeling 2007 Modeling Immokalee 13 wells 13 wells -no change Orangetree 2 wells 4 wells — 2 new wells Ave Maria Utility Co. 0 wells 6 new wells Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City 8 wells 8 wells - greater pumping Everglades City 3 wells 3 wells — no change Collier County Utilities (Golden Gate) 32 wells 34 wells - 2 new wells & greater pumping City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) 26 wells 26 wells — no change GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfield Protection Report V5 11-15-10. docx Page 14 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper • • Wellfield 2004 Modeling 2007 Modeling City of Naples (East Golden Gate) 23 wells 23 wells — no change Port of the Islands Not modeled Not modeled 3. MODELING OF 2010 LEADING TO 2010 LDC AMENDMENT REQUEST 3.1 STAKEHOLDERS The necessary raw data for the 2010 modeling was gathered from the public water supply wellfield owners and stakeholders in November 2009 and the wellfield protection modeling was carried out in early 2010 by PCD staff member Dr. Alister Burnett, Environmental Specialist. The wellfields modeled in 2010 included: Immokalee Wellfield Orangetree Wellfield Ave Maria Utility Co,Wellfield Port of the Islands Wellfield Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City Wellfield Everglades City Wellfield Collier County Utilities Wellfield City of Naples - East Golden Gate Wellfield City of Naples - Coastal Ridge Wellfield The full listing of organizations and personnel that were the primary contacts for the 2010 modeling is provided as Appendix A. K* ul rll 11. The purpose of the 2010 modeling was, as before, to establish areas of increasing vulnerability surrounding each public wellfield that needed special protection from pollution. The methods used were exactly as described and used previously: collecting the relatively limited amount of input data; keying this data into the software; running the modeling software; generating the one, two, five, and twenty year particle flow path lines; drawing the shapes /polygons that surround each of these flow path shapes; and, copying and superimposing these zone shapes onto a base map of the county. These Wellfield Protection Zone maps then form the basis of the LDC content. 3.3 RESULTS An important issue that became clear with this modeling was that every wellfield experienced some change since the 2007 modeling. Many of the changes were relatively minor; e.g., one or two wells abandoned or new wells drilled, new pumps with changed capacities installed, SFWMD annual withdrawal allocation changes, revisions to provided well coordinates, etc. There was no wellfield with exactly the same Wellfield Protection Zone as for the 2007 modeling. • Since 2007 the new shallow Port of the Islands Wellfield input data was compiled and applied to the model which then generated new one, two, five, and twenty year timelines; i.e., special treatment ovelay Wellfield Protection Zones ST /W -1, ST/W -2, ST/W -3, and ST/W -4. This new wellfield is included in Map 1 for the first time. GMPpaper 2010 - biellfteld Protection Report 6511- 15- 10.docx Page 15 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper A summary of the changes between the 2004, 2007, and 2010 modeling, which gives rise to this • request for Amendments to the "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map" located within the Collier County Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element, is listed below. Wellfield 2004 Modeling 2007 Modeling 2010 Modeling Immokalee 13 wells 13 wells - no change 16 wells — 3 new wells Orangetree 2 wells 4 wells — 2 new wells 4 wells — changed pumping Ave Maria Utility Co. 0 wells 6 new wells 6 wells — changed pumping Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City 8 wells 8 wells - greater pumping 8 wells — changed pumping Everglades City 3 wells 3 wells — no change 3wells — changed pumping Collier County Utilities (Golden Gate) 32 wells 34 wells - 2 new wells & greater pumping 36 wells — 2 new wells City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) 26 wells 26 wells — no change 31 wells — 5 new wells City of Naples (East Golden Gate) 23 wells 23 wells — no change 23 wells — changed pumping Port of the Islands Not modeled Not modeled 3 new shallow wells Detailed model input data for each wellfield is attached in Appendix B. 4. REFERENCES Bennett, M.W., April 1992, A Three- Dimensional Finite Difference Ground Water Flow Model of Western Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 92 -04, DRE 312, 358p. Burns, W.S., and Shih, George, 1984, Preliminary evaluation of ground water monitoring network in Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water Management District Technical Memorandum, 46 p. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., 1987, Final Report, Wellfield Protection Zone Modeling, Lee County Florida, Prepared for Department of Community Development Division of Environmental Services, Fort Myers, Florida: Page 4 -8. is Pollution Control Department, 1991, Collier County Environmental Services Division, Ground Water Protection Ordinance Technical Report, PC- OFR- 91 -05, 247p. is de Marsily, Ghislain, 1986, Quantitative Hydrogeology: Academic Press, London, 440 p. GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfleld Protection Report Y511- 15- 10.docx Page 16 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper Gee and Jenson, 1980, Big Cypress Basin water resources study No. 2201: contract report 77- 186, isGee and Jenson Engineers, Architects, and Planners, Inc., West Palm Beach, 118p. Gethar, L.W., 1986, Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications: Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, No. 9, p. 135S -145S. Hunter/HydroSoft, Inc., April 1989, Appendix Report - Collier County Three - Dimensional Ground water Modeling Study: Hunter/HydroSoft. HydroSoft, Inc., 1988, Three - dimensional model of ground water flow in Collier County, Florida: Data assimilation, model conceptualization, and parameters: Contract Letter Report 1, Hunter/HydroSoft, Inc., Sarasota, Florida, 47p. Jacob, P.G., 1983, Hydrogeology of the shallow aquifer south of Naples, Collier County: South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 83 -3, 52p. Journel, A.G., and Huijbregts, Ch.J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600p. Knapp, M.S., Bums, W.S., and Sharp, T.S., 1986, Preliminary assessment of the ground -water resources of western Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 86 -1, Parts 1 and 2, 142p. Prickett, T. A., 1967, Designing Pumped Well Characteristics into Electric Analog Models: isGround Water v. 5(4), National Water Well Association. Prickett, T.A., T.G. Naymik, and C. G. Lomiquist, 1981, A Random -Walk Solute Transport Model for Selected Groundwater Quality Evaluations: Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin 65p. Swayze, L.J., and McPherson, B.F., The effect of the Faka Union Canal system on water levels in the Fakahatchee Strand, Collier County, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water - Resources Investigations 77 -61, 19p. Hunter/HydroSoft, Inc., 1988, Interim InterTrans Users Guide: Hunter/HydroSoft, Inc. Voorhees, M.L., 1981, Advanced methods for the selection of urban runoff design storms: Doctoral thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign, 207p. Voorhees, M.L., and Kirkner, R.A., 1987, Users guide for applied ground water flow with InterSat: HydroSoft, Inc., Sarasota, Florida, 132p. Voorhees, M.L., and Mades, D.M., August 1989, Three- Dimensional Simulation of Wellfeld Protection Areas in Collier County, Florida, 120p. Voorhees, M.L., Mades, D.M., and Ruskauff, Greg, 1988, Report on Lee County kriging analysis, water -level network optimization, and water budget: contract report, HydroSoft, Inc., Sarasota, 38p. is Voorhees, M.L. March 2003, Update of Three- Dimensional Simulation of Wellfield Protection Areas in Collier County, Florida, 80p. GMPpaper 2010 - Tflel field Protection Report 6511- 15- 10.docx Page 17 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper Walton, W.C., 1985, Groundwater supply and contamination: National Water Well Association. Walton, W.C., 1970, Groundwater resource evaluation: McGraw -Hill. GMPpaper 2010 - Weltfleld Protection Report YS 11- I5- IO.docx Page 18 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper U • GMP- FLUE Amendment Request • APPENDIX A: TABLE OF OWNERS AND STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE 2010 WELLFIELD PROTECTION ZONE MODELING F_ L 4 Organization Role — Contact Person (s) Address of Contact Contact Telephone # Contact Email Dr. Alister 3301 Tamiami Trail East Al isterBumettacolliergov.net Collier County Project Burnett Health & Comm. Bldg. 239 732 -2502 ext 5087 !a�collier ov.net RobWard g Pollution Control Coordinator Rob Ward 3rd Floor 239 732 -2502 ext 5388 & Prevention Dept Supervisor Naples, FL 34113 Independent Wellfield Model Dr. Michael C/o Hazlett- Kincaid Inc Consultant Program Voorhees 15 Rockhill Drive, 610 325 -2174 mvoorcamichaellvoorhees.com Designer Broomall, PA 19008 Dottie Joiner City Clerk Everglades Everglades City Scott City 239 695 -3781 dsmallwoodacityofeverglades.c Everglades City Wellfield 102 Broadway Avenue 239 253 -9714 om Owner /Operator E., Everglades City FL Tim Stevens 34139 Florida Golden Gate City Robert Dick FL Government Utilities Government Wellfield (Severn Authority 2394554704 rdickastes.com Utility Authority Owner /Operator Trent) 4300 Golden Gate Pkwy 2397074275 Naples, FL 34116 Immokalee Immokalee Water & Immokalee City Wellfield Jerry Sewer District 239 658 -3630 jer ywarden a IW- SD.com Owner /Operator Warden 1020 Sanitation Road Immokalee, FL 34142 Orange Tree Kimberly Orange Tree Utility Co Orange Tree Wellfield Retallic Inc., 4500 2395964088 wmurchie agmail.com Utility Co. Owner /Operator William Executive Drive # 110, Murchie Naples FL 34119 Principal Environmental Golden Gate Specialist Collier County Wellfield Steve Lang Collier County, Water 239 252 -6113 stevelangacolliergov.net Utilities Owner /Operator Administration 4370 Mercantile Ave. Naples, FL 34104 East Golden Gate Dept of Public Works, City of Naples Wellfield Owner /Operator Bobb Reeder Utilities 380 Riverside Circle, 239 213 -3005 239 213 -3001 Fax breederanaplesgov.com Naples, FL 34102 Ave Maria Water David Utilities Genson 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy, Dgensonabarroncollier.com Barron Collier Ave Maria Naples, FL 34142 Companies Water Wellfield David Johnson Engineering, 239 262 -2600 dhoffmanajohnsonengineering tilities Owner /Operator Hoffman 2122 Johnson Street, Ft. 813 874 -0777 Myers, FL 34105 GMPpaper 2010 - Wellfield Protection Report V5 11- 15- 10.docx Page 19 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request Organization Role Contact Address of Contact Contact Telephone # Contact Email — Person (s) Jennifer Drozd Water Use Regulation South Florida Water Use (Water Use Dept Jdrozd@sfwmd.gov Water Permitting Regulation) SFWMD, Gun Club 561682-2055 Management Authority ty Donna Road 561682 -2729 drickabuCsfwmd.gov Rickabus West Palm Beach, FL (Water Use) Robert Dick (Severn Trent) 5726 Corporation Circle, 2397074275 rdick(�stes.com Port of the Islands Port of the Islands Ft. Myers, FL 33905 " Wellfield Ronald Hole Montes, 950 Encore Benson Way, Naples, FL 34110 239 254 -2000 RonBenson`nahmeng.com (Hole Montes) Water Utilities City of Marco Marco Lakes Department bweinsteingcityofmarcoisland.c Island Water Rater Utility Weinstein 50 Bald Eagle Drive, City 239 389 -5182 om Owner /Operator of Marco Island, FL 34145 GMPpaper 2010 - 9 ellfleld Protection Report Y511- 15- 10.docx Page 20 of 33 Growth Management Plan Paper 0 • • h m a a d b Z d Q j V • d d A z a w O A a w w a a w 3 0 0 N M x F�1 A • a a d u (Y) M M M l0 M o Z l0 l0 1-0 N O r1 0 v V O O O O O O O O O O Ln A, o Ln n Ln Ln O In Ln In o o N 3 u► M M M N N M M M a' N N U C L S4 5 i-I r4 S-I 5 i4 E� i4 S4 r S4 r i4 �-I S4 is un O ro 3 O ro 3 •,-1 O ro 3 -� O ro 3 0 ro 3 O ro 3 •H O ro 3 -A 0 ro 3 m ro a� ro a� ro O r O r O r4 0 o f O r O r 0 O 0 r4 0 L Q a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a F H H H El H H N H H H M d' Ol m OD M r-i m co O lfl 07 i' 00 H H In co 07 v' N Ol r N N Q = j= � � r- al Ln l0 O N Ol M r .< i `-' O O Ol M Ln Z p lfl �10 Ln lfl Q0 Q0 Q0 lfl Lf) Lf� Ln M is CD M M 6l M N r N 0) M r 00 L_ M to m lfl lfl O Ln H N M Q w c.�'. N l0 Ol l0 O C Ln In N v' 110 N rA N N H 07 01 6l 00 OD l0 Ln CQ N N N O O O o O H r--I 'A z W n n Ln Un Ln u-) Ln Ln Lrn Ln Lrn w� V 0^ M M M M Cl) M M M M M M Q +� Q V lfl lfl lfl l0 to M lfl M l0 M 10 M l0 M l0 M l0 M ai U M w p M M M M . M M M M M M M M In l0 r co m N O O O o O O O O O O O w 3 N N N H r-i H H H O O O ,Q ED 2) a a 6> 3 a) G) Q) a H H H r1 H H H o ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro a a� a� a o o O o 0 0 0 0 r+ O o O Q %. z z z H H H H H H H H H H H C H N M r M Q' Ln l0 U] Cn co 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 N N N r-I '--i r1 H H r co Ol a a a� 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N m d 0 0 U d 0 O 0 N y z U v 1 d 3 Z d Z Q L t N d lQ 3 0 0 w m 0 w E 0 0 U c -v 3 L U cz u U O 3 21 cz X U w b U 3 L U Cc cz s U U 0 T co X U _ a w U .y Ca c E LISbA c co 3 'O O w 7 0 U H T- N M 3 ° L .0 3 a� t U_ t 3 0 LL' L w O LC OA _ U .1 0 U ►' 0. v U LIZ U a. 8 LL 3 U 3 c LO aD U L _ 0 U v w w ti O n a W a 3 a A C' W • d 0 0 G, m z v CIO z 7. Z 0 U O N m a 3 0 h i O N a sz U 0 C .3. O U M 110 M Cl) M cO y f �1 W G Q �\�/ u O O O O O o V Ln M Ln N U-) M a-) M Ln M C L �w �4ro �4 0ro Oro Oro ro ro a ro a ro a ro a ro ,0 yLQ H E H F M L' Ln O m 00 O w l0 N 11 O m M rn O r M Ln Ln to Ln Ln z ° LC) r Ln r Ln r Ln r Ln r Z M a, M r p0 L l0 O M Ln M U w r r O7 N N a.i Ln Ln Ln Z W H H -i r-I H Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln W = V °^ M M M Cl) Cl) en M M M M Q f11 H N M � N O H H H H U 3 H O H H H u.i U H H H H H 3 r �. x ro ro ro ro L o x x x x u H H H H H w U) W G7 W W co U) U) U] r-I r-I H H H U 3 3 3 3 3 N d lQ 3 0 0 w m 0 w E 0 0 U c -v 3 L U cz u U O 3 21 cz X U w b U 3 L U Cc cz s U U 0 T co X U _ a w U .y Ca c E LISbA c co 3 'O O w 7 0 U H T- N M 3 ° L .0 3 a� t U_ t 3 0 LL' L w O LC OA _ U .1 0 U ►' 0. v U LIZ U a. 8 LL 3 U 3 c LO aD U L _ 0 U v w w ti O n a W a 3 a A C' W • d 0 0 G, m z v CIO z 7. Z 0 U O N m a 3 0 h i O N a sz U 0 C .3. O U y m a 0 E� Z N Q j V 1� u T cl a • L s 3 3 U w U U 3 W C s rl i. d 0 Q C v v a S 3 0 U M O M N V oD c7 Cl. � c^ "" rn rn rn rn U O O O O O O (D O � u► M M M M U Q) 0 Q) ro a) ro ro b � b a ro ro Lo„ < a oo L o 00 .^� 't l0 N (-i cT O rl l0 L v M (Y) N rl Z z M >, co m oo L. M Ln O N Q v O Ol O I'D Ln C CC zw l0 l0 110 l0 W = en co CC) m w 0 - o o O o ■ N H H H E- 3 0 O O O D Q H H H H L: '~ O O O O 3 r N M ^ H H H E- 0 O O 0 LL �' rl r-I rl rl •rLj E rl r-i y o a) 3 a) 3 a) 3 a) 3 C) �4 �4 �4 4-) 41 4-J +-) a) (D a) Q) ro ro ro ro �4 �4 �4 �4 0 0 0 0 d 0 Q C v v a S 3 0 U M O M N V oD c7 Cl. d a d C j d N C' M l0 O o \C 3 a CD Ln 03 N N U " 00 = L ^ S4 a) '� o, ro ro ro ro o O o O o O Iz o O o 0 0 0 z is O U 00 L [� v IT �o M a M Q h LQ zw N N N N tA = L w= V o ^ w A •V �= �4 S4 S4 S4 S4 S4 O (13 3 -� (1) ro 3 a) ro 3 -H a) ro 3 Q) ro 3 •rt a) ro 3 -� C p O O O E O O E O L Q a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro p H H H H H H QN N 000 w M [� d D O N M Q L M N N .—I O m Z p N N N N N rl U � � w w M Cn Cn m O l0 00 M M M Ql Q7 m N N co Q' W N N M M zr 1 ri ri r-, r W W l9 Q0 l0 l0 M N N N N N N 0 N M N N O O O O O O < 3 0 3 o41 J-) J-) J-) 1-) J-) v a Q r N M (a i ro i ro ro ro �4 3 �l 3 �A 3 �4 �4 p (1) (1) (1) r-i (1) r-i a) V > a) > a) > a) > m > > a� 3 < < 3 < 3 00 rl O O a d Q �.r G� LD ^ N C' M l0 O o \C 3 a CD Ln 03 N N U " 00 = L S4 a) S4 a) '� o, ro ro ro ro i Q 3 H 3 H 0, M 000 z is O I 00 L [� v IT �o M a M Q h LQ zw N N N N w= V o ^ w A •V M M 0!. V M Ol Ql w p Q N V 3 O h O h w �w 3 0 w 'L v d D u c 3 3 U � � w w • 0 N as w y i x d a i S 0 U h d O� PI Z d G j V �J a w cc) N C O O .-1 M l0 l0 M M p U .--1 rl N N CQ V N N N U " 'u 0 0 0 0 0 0 a, �o w O Ln Ln n n 3o3 E M M a C O 00 000 y Q N M N M N i O v w i4 0 F4 N i4 W i4 4J i-I N i4 N N rl N rl N rl (1) ri N rl N r-A fl ro ro (0 co (0 (0 ro ro ro (a (a ro yO, Q 3 P 3 E 3 E, 3 H 3 E 3 E+ w Ln w a .0 co co O V M N N N 000 y Ln Ln "r lO m r- is s« O O r m m m Q L N N U U U 3 zz a I U U en i. M [ M OD M O 00 L r- L` O Q l0 LO l0 l0 d' to y Q 07 07 N OD cc N f3 N N N N N N r l) Ca w= +1 +-) -1-) U U en w O m rn rn rn rn rn O U t:7) " Q) �4 ai �-A Q) W W W M Ln N O rl N O O O O —i r-I 3 � � h A 0 0 0 "" GUa CUs CUB 3 O 0 d 'L u v D C) ,-1 M Ln OD rl -I r-i r-I rl rl r-i r-I C 4J 0) 4J N d 3 3 3 3 3 3 U w w w w w w a w M 0 O N u i 0 v C 0 u m O S O_ O N a a y U CQ V N N N U " an E 3 E 3 E a C O (n 000 y Q N M N M N i O O O Z O 0') Ln M Ln M L' z M is Ol 07 M 00 L A v 1-i O C7) M N a R Z w M M M Ln Ln Ln w a .0 co co co V M N N N w O . Q CD CD CD Q N U U U 3 a U U U 6� 3 r N M = W W W d r l) Ca +1 +-) -1-) U U U O U t:7) " Q) �4 ai �-A Q) W W W M 0 O N u i 0 v C 0 u m O S O_ O N a a y U a C r o, 3 z d Q V J w 3 w F d V z w A a O V w • O A 0. `a O d O J s 0 J y A 00 co co cc w co ao m m m m 00 00 ^ v o O o O o o O o O O O O O w O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U " L i-1 i-1 FA SA S4 1,4 3-I S4 i4 F4 S-1 �4 S-I p 'p vi 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 C p O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O Ez O E ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a co a ro a ro a ro a ro .a ro a ro a ro +L E E H E Ei H E E-+ E F F E E Ln co O Ol M -4 N [- O 00 Op ^ N l0 N Ln .-i r- rl O Ln l0 Ln Ln �] M 61 O co co O O O O M M v' M Cl) C' M M Ln l0 N 61 O r-1 N M p co co OD 00 00 00 m co OD m Ol ON m Z Z l0 lO lO l0 19 l9 l0 �.o kD lO lO to lO M lO N N .-1 O N l0 Q1 O l0 O N d' 00 L al dl r-I l0 N [- Ln M M N .--I O O m M l0 O N N N N N N N N Q h N M Ln l0 00 [ r r r- 1` 1` 1` 1` Z Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln U-) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln W c c v c v c c NT c c NT c W .. Q v O O O O O O O O (D O O O O v M7 Ln Ln U-) Ln u-) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N N N f-1 N M cl Ln l0 1` Ol O N M v N O O O O O O O O -1 '--A IMA -A 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O a 3 c� U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 3 O rl N Cl) -i N M d' Ln Ol r-I .--1 -A -A '--I 4J Q) Q) (2) C) C •� 3 3 3 3^ 3n 3n 3^ 3^ 3^ 3^ 3^ 3: 3n •u V V rVr^^ V rVr^^ V rVr^^ V rVr^^ V � � IVInn V rVr^^ V rVr^^ V IVI^^ V ''V^^ V rVr^^ V IVI^^ V U U U U U U U U U U U U U ^+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O = U U U U U U U U U U U U U l4 14 la �-4 is s4 S4 SA S4 s4 l4 O N N N O (1) N N N N O O p •r -I-i -11 H -H I -H U 1 r1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U I U U U U U U U I U U U I U • O A 0. `a O d O J s 0 J h d r d r Q j V l� u • m W 0 r N m d. a 4 y U ^ 07 OD 07 OD CO OO co co OJ 07 OD O7 OD W • a ri m 0) rn rn m rn rn C) m rn rn m rn p u W c u) Ln Ln Ln Ln rn T) -) rn rn rn Jn rn M .. 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O p,a ° o 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 U " C L "u w is 14 i4 F-1 i4 r is r is i4 i4 i4 i4 i4 i-i i1 ro ro a) ro a) ro a) ro w ro a) ro Q) ro 3 -r1 0 ro 3 -r-1 Q) ro 3 -H a) ro 3 -r{ Q) ro 3 -ri a) ro 3 -H W ro 3 -r1 C O O O E O E; Or� O E~ O Ei Or� O OF� O Er OE� O r O 5 a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro py E� Ei E� E E+ E-� Ei E- El H E- El El E-1 r— O7 m l0 l0 OZ) N N M N N r— �T O pop y ^ N N a' 1-0 to to O OD Ol -IT M 61 v' r- Q M [ r r— r— N N —A Ln N O O r-1 Q L S C M M M C' N r-1 O Cl co co co Ln p m 6l 00 co OD 07 CO OZ) co h r— r r— O7 Z Z l0 lfl lfl 110 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 M is In co ui N N —A .--I C to v' l0 -ZT In pp L N h C Ln OD a N N N N M M l0 co 6W y^ w+ �""' —A �--1 a% N rn r— OD N co OJ co ri C' l0 a.i r— r— m � N N r— r— r— r— r— Ol O N Lr) ul rn l0 110 l0 Lf� rn In Ln Lf� U-) l0 Ln 'Z W = Q� y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O "' rn rn rn rn Ln Ln In Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln In LTa G �" lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl Q0 lfl fl fl fl N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln l0 r— N dl O —1 N M �v Ln l0 r— OJ ' N f-1 —1 r-1 1--1 r-i N N N N N N N N N w 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O U 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U d 3 r Ln l0 r— co Ol O r-I N M 'T Ln lD r— OO N N N N N N (N N --1 C a) a) a) a) (1) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 'L U C9 C7 U' C7 Ci C7 U U u u u U U' u �) U U U U U U U U U U U U U 6> A >1 >1 >1 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 7 C C C .+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E i1 34 S4 �4 �4 S4 �4 N i4 S4 S-1 S-1 S4 S4 E a) a) a) a) Q) Q) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) Q) -r1 •ri •rl -rl -rl -rl -ri -rl -rl -rf -ri •rl -rl V-H � r-I r-I r� rl r-i r-I r-I rl rl r-I rl r-I rl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U ju U U ju U ju ju U U ju ju U m W 0 r N m d. a 4 y U h D• C r d Z d j Y. U rl rl z W O N O co N O) N N U N O N ' Ol 6l 61 Ol 61 Ql 61 6l Ol Q y I A Ui Lfi J-) LO Ln Ui In Ln Ln a ro 000 — O O O o o rn o O O „ O O o o O rn O o O 3 a-• o O O O o rn O O O U " GL� u V M L W o co w F4 i1 S4 S4 i4 it E i4 E 14 E S4 r.., �n 3 + 3 + 3 3 •� 3 3 3 3 w ro 3 -,A O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E i Q a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro p„ F E-1 H El E- E- E-+ El E- 0) O M N I oe y t- O Ol O M N N ro N M U) ro O rl O O M Ln l0 r- Q' Ln Ln Ln Z p N m 61 dl 07 O O1 m O z Q 00 L 07 d' l.0 Ln O l0 'r C- O 0 Q ", Ol l0 m .--I Ln Q0 Ln co r-i = M N l0 f- -A lO a' M r- C7 z l0 Ln Ln Ln Ln M M Ln W v c c v v c v v c Qr. O O O O O O O O O Iwo r v M Ln Ln lt-) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln W e Q0 Q Ln a N N N N N N N N N n^ m O rf N M G' Ln l0 [- N N M M M M M M M M 3 U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 L: U U U U U U U U U v 3 Ol O N M Lo l0 I N M M M M M M M M 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 C. U U U U U U U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C 7 C C C C = U U ;J U U U U U U v (1) Q) a) 0) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U rl rl z W O • L M 0 O 00 N ODD S i O d O U 0 Y Y S 3 0 Zy U N O U O � V � •^'• L i4 E 7 tn 3 a ro 000 N l0 _ Q L Z p z 1° M 00 L ^ Ln CQ a.i Ol z W M W� GL� u V M W o co 0 r 3 c v 3 � O r-I O M h G 3 8 ro U U) ro `. ro 0 U • L M 0 O 00 N ODD S i O d O U 0 Y Y S 3 0 Zy U h d o> Z Ol Z Q v • �J w a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p u V Lzi V1 v c c yr c v v c c c c c v c U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a �� Lr) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln � Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 3 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M r' L •V S4 S4 �4 1-I S-I S-1 i4 �d i4 %4 f4 i4 i4 to a) ro 3 a) m 3 Q) m 3 --1 m m 3 •H O ro 3 O ro 3 a) ro 3 Q) m 3 (D ro 3 a) ro 3 ro ro 3 a) ro 3 O m 3 Q) m 3 C O E O E: 0�i O E~ O E O E~ 0 r4 O E O E O E 0 0 0 O E a a ro a ro a ro a ro a (0 a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro p E• E- E, H E- E- E- Ei Ei E- E-i E- E- E- O C— O m Ln M O Lr) 0o0 y^ M N O t` N rl M m m co 07 M O N M M Ln Ln to O co l9 N N N M U l0 Q L O O O r-1 N C Q' Ln [— OD m O N p I` r- I` I` I` I` I` I` I` I` I` N oO co %.0 �.o Q0 Q0 110 �.o �.o I M is m m I— N N m r-I —i m OD m M rl M 00 L _ co O I` I` �.o O m (n Ln 'IT N a' Ln 0 +U+ F 7 —1 r-I Ln Ln Ln l0 Ln Ln to 1-1 r-1 f-1 0) Ol Q y I` N l0 lfl l0 lO to l0 lfl I` I� l0 Qo z W M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W N N N N N N N N N N N Q w Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M yr yr yr yr �' a' yr yr yr c W m OD OD OD N W N co* co* co* co* 07 co, N Q�..i r-I r-i f-i rl ri rl r-I rl r-i rl rl r-i r-I r-I 0 r..l N y N M c Ln to [� dl O r-i N M Ln 3 a �U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 3 r N M yr Ln tlo I` O m O r-I N M v' Ln O O O O O O O O p M M M M M M M M M M M M M M w y a) (1) Q) Q) Q) a) (1) a) Q) a) a) Q) Q) Q) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 A m (3) (1) a) 0 a) a) (1) a) a) (1) Q) (1) Q) is Z7) 0) Z-7) tr m ZD) CD 0� 0) 0) 0� d a a a a a a a a a rz a a a a 0 ro ro m � m � ro � ro ro ro � ro � ro 4J ro � ro +j ro +� ro +) m �--) m m m co +j m +-) m m m m m m m m ro ro ro ro ro m ro ro ro m ro ro ro ro O O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O U ju U U ju ju ju ju ju U ju lu ju ju C) 0 o` N A i O d C O rj 0 C S a 0 0 N a y z v or, C =:7 J ej Ur d ^ N N N N N N N N N N N .a p. O O O O O O O O O O O r- r- O Q .. c -IT v' Ln u-) v' U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 3 y �o n n n n n n n n n O O Ln Cl) M M M M M M M M M M to 1.f) M U " L' w i-1 E; i4 >4 i4 i-1 it i-1 14 SA i4 i4 i-1 S4 S4 �n a) (13 3 (1) ro 3 (1) m 3 + a) ro 3 Q) m 3 -r1 a) ro 3 -1 a) (0 3 •r1 (1) ro 3 •r1 (1) ro 3 (1) m 3 -H a) ro 3 -r1 a) m 3 -,A a) ro 3 -H a) ro 3 •H O Ei O Ei O 0 0 0 0 E3 0 0 O E: O E O E 0 0 i Q a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro E, E• H E-+ H H E- E, E, E- E- E- 00 Ln N OO C to Lf) co O m M 000 S^ O r 1 O l0 I— r- 00 N 1` _q O Cl co O m 01 0) m c0 07 co N m al —1 r- ...i Ln l0 h co m O M -IT M lD [� 0 00 07 00 m m m co co m m m r— to z Z l0 l0 Q0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 110 en i. 1` r— 07 l0 O c0 M 1b 110 C C' 1-4 Ql m M 1— O 1-1 tf) 00 f— O to 0) (- `/� to r— 07 m r1 N M Q' 00 O a-) l0 Q R as �D �.o Q0 r- 1` r— r— 1` 07 Q' Z Ol O\ G) Ol m m m m m m m Ql Ol 01 GTi M M M M M M M M M M M M M M w= V p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q Q N N N N N N N N N N N (N (N N Lz7 O CZ) OJ 00 CC) OD 00 OJ o7 00 m m co co 1b Q 0 N Q0 I 00 Ol O r-1 [- 07 �, m y M 3 0 v rz cz rz cz cz cz a c� a a a x rz rz L. u u u u u u c-) c-) u u u u u 3 1 Q0 1— 00 m O rl N (n C [— 00 1..0 0) N N N N N N N N O O M v. M M M M M M M M M M M M (n M •L rl r-I r--I rl r-I r-I r-i r-I rl ri � r-I r-I r-I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 C (D a) a) a) a) a) C) a) 0 a) a) a) a) a) < 0) �D) 0� 0) tr 0� ZDI 0) tT 0) 0) _q -r-1 -r-I -rl -rl -r-I -r-I -.� -.i -r1 -r1 •rl •rl •r-I -r-1 �, a rz a a a a a a a a cz rx rz a� a� m ro ro m m ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro m 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m D U It ro m ro m ro ro ro ro ro m ro m m a) O O o O O O O O O o O O O 0 �4 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u na • f �I J M cn O 0 M c U N 3 0> j U • • 6� O (D o O 3 �a �z Lr) Ln U " i4 S4 'u a) ro a) ro o E o f a. Q a ro a ro E E- >1 L O N OC U O 'U `0 O z p z O Q0 M >' m M 00 L 00 N w 'T Ln R z W d M Ln M W = N ii u V M v a W ..i co co Q 0 -- �o 0 N U M M "T M 3 S-I rE S4 E� A f-1 E� S-I E: � 4 r S4 r S-I E C a) ro 0 ro 3 (D ro 3 a) ro 3 a) ro 3 3 a) ro 3 a) ro 3 + Q' 0 F, 0 r p I l0 M I O IV C i.+ M M L Q a ro a ro T { a ro y a) Q) G 3 3 E E E E+ CT N O» Ln O O 1' M °� N lO v) m E ro o (a 0 0 w N m L ro Q) ro a Ln 0 s 0 s4 U Q4 I U S: H W H d 'U O O O O O O O O 003 a O O O O O O O O U L = w S-I rE S4 E� S-1 F� f-1 E� S-I E: � 4 r S4 r S-I E ci a) ro 0 ro 3 (D ro 3 a) ro 3 a) ro 3 a) ro 3 a) ro 3 a) ro 3 + Q' 0 F, 0 r 0 0 0 E 0 r 0 r 0 L Q a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro p, E+ E-+ E E E E+ E H Ln O O 1' M O N lO 0 w N m L 6l Ln N Cn Ln M N rl m co I` Ln m m m m m CC) co co z M >7 rl .--I N lfl l0 61 l0 00 L O O m Ln M 'T Q' Ln _ W M 6l 61 61 � Ol 61 M A iY C� M w co co co m m co CC) u W co co co co m m m m Q Or-I N M Q' LO l0 f� 07 N O O O O O O O O w 3 (7 C7 U CD CD u C7 0 Q .p z~ w w w w w w w w 3 r� —I N M Q' ui l0 [— co O O O O O O O O 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q) a) a) 0 a) a) a) 0 4-1 11 J-) 4--1 1-1 .0 O C7 C.7 C7 C7 C9 C7 C7 C� w () a) 0 A O O O O O O O 0 m m m m m m m U) (1) (1) (1) (1) a) a) a) a) C rl rl r-I rl r-I r-I r--I � W Oa Q4 LL O4 Q, CL 04 Q. ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro CL 2 Z Z 2 2 2 2 Z O VW W W W W W W L�4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 11 11 11 J-1 aJ 1-1 11 J-1 U I U I U I U I U JU I U I U Ob 0. : O d 0 U O S 3 0 0 N U of z r v Q L i • • O N u OA i O v o: 0 U d O y d S 3 0 cy U .-. OD OD N M co CO � C' C' C CV CO C' l0 N Ln (14 N N U-) Lf� U') Ln d') N Ln l0 Q H C7 wU-) Ln 'T u-) Ln Ln r r r r r 1-n r Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 3 m 14 o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 ° C) Ln Q0 r r r L u �= 1-I E S4 E i-I E i-I S4 E i4 E S4 E SA E $-1 E-, i4 E �4 E S4 E i4 E i4 E 'S to O ro 3 --1 0) ro 3 --1 N ro 3 -H 0) ro 3 -11 N ro 3 -� N ro 3 -14 N ro 3 •4 w ro 3 -1 O ro 3 -�1 O ro 3 —1 O ro 3 .,� O ro 3 - -1 O ro 3 •r-1 O ro 3 .,� C p- O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E y„ Q a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a ro a CO a ro H F H H H F H H H H N F K1 i' O OD ri co l0 N O d' N N 00 00 y �--1 O co r G' N O r d' ri CO M Q' �--1 ^ w 110 M M �10 M O C)1 N Tn CO ri 'T CO M O 61 CO r 61 O rl M Q' Ln .--I OJ Co � Co lo Co I r r Ol 110 61 Q0 O r O r O r O r O r Ol Z en zT Ln r-1 M r Ql M .--I Ln oo L. 0 r co rn O O r Ln Ln M rn r Ln _ r r m m �10 -10 �o �10 21 c r Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N r w 00 m m m m m OD m m m co co r Lz7 v' v c v v c c c c v v' v v v W V p O1 (n a O) 01 0) 0) 0) 0) m (n 0) m of Q: Q (n M 11) M M M M M M M M M M M M co co m Co Co co Co CO Co OD OD m m OO w G co OO 00 co CO Co Co CO CO 07 07 OD O7 co Q M O —1 N M C' l0 r co m O 1-1 Ln M N O .A .-i —1 r-A N N N N 3 '7 3 C) O r-1 N M IT l0 r Co m O —i to M O N (,A N (N —I ri ri ri rl r-I r-i rl r-I r-i ri r-I rl rl rl rl -� rl r-I r-i .—I rl r-I ri ri r-i ri r-I O O N O N O O Q) Q) O O N O N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 J-1 j 41 11 J-) -W J-) lW 31 .0 -P J-) -W -W ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro Q C7 C7 C7 C7 C� C7 C7 C� C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 L O O O O O 0) N O O N N O 0) TI 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O co cn U) m co m U) m (n co m U) m m N (1) O N O O (1) 0 O O N O N N a4 a4 n. a Q4 a a a a n, a 04 n, a ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro = z z z z z z z z z z z z z z v E w w w w w w w w w w w w w w E O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q >1 71 rte, >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >, ', >, >, U lu lu lu lu lu lu lu lu lu lu lu lu lu • • O N u OA i O v o: 0 U d O y d S 3 0 cy U v 3 r d i r r Q j • oU �. ^ N a o Q N N N u o �o O L' L "u w H ai ro .v 0 Q 0 C64 H 00 i, 0 w N Q L zzv Q) (1) Ln 00 L r Q ai zw r Z ro w M a owl en Gz1 0 C� H 00 Q �-A �4 sa N 6a N C7 3 N 0 l) � 41 JJ �.. ro ro W 3 >' N O r-I r-I 3 d L a� O J-� O C� w R6 .L h � � � 0 r-I 0 is CD c1' U) a� Q 1. H a = ro z „ 8 44 o 0 U � L(-) r zw U CID G i O d C c 0 U d O Cl- d S �S v v N N N .v 0 0 0 3 a �10 o 0 0 U " Q) (1) —i r H Z ro ro ro 44.1 0 H H H 0 � �-A �4 sa L Q N l) � 41 JJ ro ro ro >' H O Ln OZ) d L O O Co z p Ln Ln is N c1' r Q 1. O r O Q •� �•• OD L(-) r zw w w G OD CC) co p; o V M w O Ln u-) Ln > Q O O O 3 w a w F«i Q H H H _., a a a 3 r N rl r-I w a w H H O O - C. 3 3 3 ci co q ro ro ro U) m co H H H ow w w U 0 0 0 s� �4 �4 0 0 0 a a a CID G i O d C c 0 U d O Cl- d S �S v v 1• I• 11 -] s)IAI& COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRs PROPOSED NORTHEAST REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT PHASE 1A WELLFIELD AREA CARICA ROAD AREAS OF INTEREST ASR CR 846 d 1n Of G. BLVD on PINE COLLIER RIDGE COUNTY UTILITIES WELLFIELD CITY OF NAPLES SR 84 COASTAL RIDGE WELLFIELD O SCALE 0 5M1. AMENDED — Ord. SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 No. 2003 -44 AMENDED Ord. — JANUARY 25, 2007 No. 2007 -18 AMENDED Ord. — DECEMBER 4, 2007 No. 2007 —B2 CR 846 ORANGETREE WELLFIELD CR 858 DO cn w a J C� CC w Li AVE MARIA WELLFIELD CITY OF NAPLES EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD 1 75 EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELD /N rn U ®RELIABILITY WELLS JS CJ (BRACKISH OR FRESH WATER) WELLFIELD AREA ASR = ACUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DINSION SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY POLLUTION CONTROL AND PREVENTION DEPT. DATE: 12/2007 FILE: WFPZR12- 2007 -1.DWG IMMOKALEE WELLFIELD N 46 — IN OPERATION FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT —�'X PLANT WELLFIELD m u SOUTH HAWTHORN WELLFIELD EXTENSION (UNDER CONSTRUCTION, FALL 08 COMPLETION) �S _ MANATEE 4/ ROAD ASR Of cn CR 846 ORANGETREE WELLFIELD CR 858 DO cn w a J C� CC w Li AVE MARIA WELLFIELD CITY OF NAPLES EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD 1 75 EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELD /N rn U ®RELIABILITY WELLS JS CJ (BRACKISH OR FRESH WATER) WELLFIELD AREA ASR = ACUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DINSION SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY POLLUTION CONTROL AND PREVENTION DEPT. DATE: 12/2007 FILE: WFPZR12- 2007 -1.DWG IMMOKALEE WELLFIELD N 46 • C7 • RESOLUTION NO. 1I- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89 -05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT O THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNIT AIRS. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Ahb- Act, was required to prepare and a WHEREAS, the Collier Cou B Collier County 19 163. et. seq., Florida nd Development Regulation ; and sioners adopted the 10; 'N89; and Comprehensive Planning and Land for local governments to amend ive co ensi ans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted ve plans pur t to tions 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and �&S' Co County has prepared plan amendment to the following elements of its and Plan: Future Land Use Element, including the Future Land Use Map and Map Series, WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission has considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted Words underlined are additions; Words stFuGk thFaygl4 are deletions 1 to it by Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) have ninety (90) days to review the proposed amendment and DCA must transmit, in writing, to Collier County, its comments along recommendations for modification, within said 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt amendment, within sixty (60) Statutes; and WHEREAS, adopted Growth Policy Florida objections and any pursuant to Section from DCA Growth Management Plan to Section 163.3184, Florida receipt of Collier County's must review and determine if the Plan Comprehensive Planning and State Comprehensive Plan; the appropriate Regional ve Code, pursuant to Section 163.3184, BE IT RESOLVED by THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs Words underlined are additions; Words StFUGk thFeugh are deletions 2 r� • • thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan amendment, prior to final adoption and State determination of compliance with the Local • • Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Rule 9J5, Florida Administrative Code, Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance. Approved as to Heidi and CPSP- 2010 -2 GMP Transmittal Resolution Attorney, F:/ Comprehensive /GMP Amendments/Transmittal Words underlined are additions; Words st#uGk thFaug14 are deletions 3 • EXIIIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT • • CPSP- 2010 -2 Policy 5.1: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: a. For such commercially -zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the new zoning district is the same or a lower intensity commercial zoning district as the existing zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of commercial land use allowed by the existing zoning district, except as allowed by Policy 5.11, is not exceeded in the new zoning district. The foregoing notwithstanding, such commercial properties may be approved for the addition of residential uses, in accordance with the Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, though an increase in overall intensity may result. A zoning change of such commercial -zoned properties to a residential zoning district is allowed as provided for in the Density Rating System of this Future Land Use Element. b. For such industrially -zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the new zoning district is the same or a lower intensity industrial, or commercial, zoning district as the existing zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of industrial land use allowed by the existing zoning district is not exceeded in the new zoning district. c. For such residentially -zoned properties, zoning changes will be allowed provided the authorized number of dwelling units in the new zoning district does not exceed that authorized by the existing zoning district, and provided the overall intensity of development allowed by the new zoning district does not exceed that allowed by the existing zoning district. d. For property deemed to be consistent with this Element pursuant to one or more of policies 5.9 through 5.13, said property may, through a zoning chance, be combined and developed with other property, whether such other property is deemed consistent via those same policies or is deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section. Such combination of properties may include re- distribution of zoning districts so long as the acreage for each existing zoning district that is deemed consistent via the referenced policies does not increase. For residential and mixed use developments only, the accumulated density between these properties may be distributed throughout the project, as provided for in the Density Rating System or the Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, as applicable. e. Overall intensity of development shall be determined based upon a comparison of public facility impacts as allowed by the existing zoning district and the proposed zoning district. Words underlined are added; words s_i —dek `_' i-eidg � are deleted. Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 I. URBAN DESIGNATION • A. Urban Mixed Use District 5. Office and In -fill Commercial Subdistrict The intent of this Subdistrict is to allow low intensity office commercial or infill commercial development on small parcels within the Urban Mixed Use District located along arterial and collector roadways where residential development, as allowed by the Density Rating System, may not be compatible or appropriate. Lower intensity office commercial development attracts low traffic volumes on the abutting roadway(s) and is generally compatible with nearby residential and commercial development. The criteria listed below must be met for any project utilizing this Subdistrict. For purposes of this Subdistrict, "abuts" and "abutting" excludes intervening public street, easement (other than utilities) or right -of -way, except for an intervening local street; and "commercial" refers to C -1 through C -5 zoning districts and commercial components of PUDs. a. The subject site is in the Urban -Mixed Use District. b. The subject site abuts a road classified as an arterial or collector on the Collier County Functional Class Map, as adopted in the Transportation Element. c. A rezone to commercial zoning is requested for the subject property in its entirety, up to a maximum of 12 acres. For a property greater than 12 acres in size, the balance of the property in excess of 12 acres is limited to an environmental conservation easement or open space. Under this provision, "open space" shall not include water management facilities unless said • facilities are incorporated into a conservation or preservation area for the purpose of enhancement of the conservation or preservation area. d. The site abuts commercial zoning: (i) On one side and non - commercial zoning on the other side; or, (ii) On both sides. e. The abutting commercial zoning may be in the unincorporated portion of Collier County or in a neighboring jurisdiction. f. The depth of the subject property in its entirety, or up to 12 acres for parcels greater than 12 acres in size, for which commercial zoning is being requested, does not exceed the depth of the commercially zoned area on the abutting parcel(s). Where the subject site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, and the depth of the commercially zoned area is not the same on both abutting parcels, the Board of County Commissioners shall have discretion in determining how to interpret the depth of the commercially zoned area which cannot be exceeded, but in no case shall the depth exceed that on the abutting property with the greatest depth of commercial area. This discretion shall be applied on a case -by -case basis. g. Project uses are limited to office or low intensity commercial uses if the subject property abuts commercial zoning on one side only. For property abutting commercial zoning on both sides, the project uses may include those of the highest intensity abutting commercial zoning district. • Words underlined are added; words =_ thr_tigb are deleted. 2 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 • h. The subject property in its entirety was not created to take advantage of this provision, evidenced by its creation prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management Plan on October 28, 1997. i. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting one side only: (i) commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met; and, (ii) uses shall be limited so as to serve as a transitional use between the commercial zoning on one side and non - commercial zoning on the other side. j. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting both sides, commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met. k. Lands zoned for support medical uses pursuant to the "1/4 mile support medical uses" provision in the Urban designation shall not be deemed "commercial zoning" for purposes of this Subdistrict. 1. For properties zoned commercial pursuant to any of the Infill Subdistricts in the Urban Mixed Use District or in the Urban Commercial District, said commercial zoning shall not qualify to cause the abutting property(s) to become eligible for commercial zoning under this Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict if said commercial zoning is the only commercial zoning abutting the site for which rezoning .g s sought. • m. Land adjacent to areas zoned C -1/T on the zoning atlas maps, or other commercial zoning obtained via the former Commercial Under Criteria provision in the FLUE, shall not be eligible for a rezone under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, except through aggregation as provided in Paragraphs i. and j. above. n. For purposes of this Subdistrict, property abutting land zoned Industrial or Industrial PUD, or abutting lands zoned for Business Park uses pursuant to the Business Park Subdistrict, or abutting lands zoned for Research and Technology Park uses pursuant to the Research and Technology Park Subdistrict, shall also qualify for commercial zoning so long as all other criteria under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict are met. o. At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer. • p. The project will be compatible with existing land uses and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties. q. The maximum acreage eligible to be utilized for the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict within the Urban Mixed Use District is 250 acres. Words underlined are added; words sti -aek thiaeaE� are deleted. 3 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 14. Davis Boulevard/County Barn Road Mixed -Use Subdistrict • Projects within this Subdistrict shall comply with the following standards and criteria: a. Commercial Component 5. Allowable commercial uses in the commercial component shall be limited to those uses permitted in the C -1, C -2, and C -3 zoning districts as contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended, in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict (Ordinance No. 2005 -25 adopted on 3uxe -27 June 7, 2005) words underlined are added; words st- -`e'_- ti.._.`u_h are deleted. 4 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations C) Sending Lands • 7. Permitted Uses: f) Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified in Section 5,.-o 7.a) through 5-e) 7.e) such as the fellewiii private wells and septic tanks; ; sewer- lines and 14# stations only if 1ee to . ,;thi non NRPA Sending Lands, rights way if te the Rur-a4 of or- easements, and neeessar-y sefve g� Essential Services as follows, necessary to serve Urban areas or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District: utility lines, exceQt sewer lines; sewer lines and lift stations, only if located within non -NRPA Sending Lands, and only if located within already cleared portions of existing rights -of -way or easements; and, water pumping stations and raw water wells. g) lri Essential Services necessary to ensure public safety. h) �ij Oil and gas exploration. Where practicable, directional - drilling techniques and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native habitats. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** • words underlined are added; words st- -`e'_- ti.._.`u_h are deleted. 4 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 • H. CONSERVATION DESIGNATION The following uses are authorized in this Designation. h. Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified in Section a through g above such as the followingi. private wells and septic tanks 11tility lines ° ..t s ° 1I.°J, sewer lines and lift stations , only if 1,e t °a within „ n NRRA !..,nef- ,dtien easements, and if necessaryy to efye n .,ubliely owned e r p } 1 dl } 1 ,t sewer- s ci-i-icc- rv-iirvmr areas and/er- the Rural cmri- Water- -and Sewer- Vl L1JL31V L, and, owned ° ntf.l water- system p „ ing n ° to urban areas and/or- the Rural T-Fansition Water- and Sewer- Di&L-ic4. i. Essential Services as follows, necessary to serve Urban areas or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District: utility lines, except sewer lines; sewer lines and lift stations, only if located within non -NRPA Conservation Lands, and only if located within already cleared portions of existing rights -of -way or easements, and if necessary to serve a publicly owned or privately owned central sewersystem providing service to urban areas and/or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District; and, water pumping stations and raw water wells necessary to serve a publicly owned or privately owned central waters system providing service to urban areas and/or the • Rural Transition Water and Sewer District. J. Essential Services necessary to ensure public safety. j, k. Oil extraction and related processing. Where practicable, directional- drilling techniques and/or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native habitats. The following uses may be permitted as Conditional Uses: a) The following uses are conditionally permitted subject to approval through a public hearing process: (1) Essential services not identified above in Paragraph h., i. and i. i Within one year, Collier County will review essential services currently allowed in the Land Development Code and will define those uses intended to be conditionally permitted in Conservation designated lands. During this one -year period or if necessary until a comprehensive plan amendment identifying conditionally permitted essential services, no conditional uses for essential services within Conservation designated lands shall be approved. F. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay The Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay, depicted on the Future Land Use Map, is within the boundaries of the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment • Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Mar-eh 14, ''nnn June 13. 2000. Words underlined are added; words sti- ek tir&agh are deleted Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 The intent of the redevelopment program is to encourage the revitalization of the • Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area by providing incentives that will encourage the private sector to invest in this urban area. This Overlay allows for additional neighborhood commercial uses and higher residential densities that will promote the assembly of commercial uses and higher residential densities that will promote the assembly of property, or joint ventures between property owners, while providing interconnections between properties and neighborhoods. The intent of this Overlay is to allow for more intense development in an urban area where urban services are available. One or more zoning overlays will be adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code to aid in the implementation of this Overlay. The following provisions and restrictions apply to this Overlay: 1. Mixed -Use Development: Mix of residential and commercial uses are permitted. For such development, commercial uses are limited to CA through C -3 zoning district uses; plu-s hotel/motel usei theatrical producers (except motion picture), bands, orchestras, and entertainers; and, uses as may be allowed by pplicable FLUE Policies. Mixed -use projects will be pedestrian oriented and are encouraged to provide access (vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle) to nearby residential areas. The intent is to encourage pedestrian use of the commercial area and to provide opportunity for nearby residents to access these commercial uses without traveling onto major roadways. Parking facilities are encouraged to be located in the rear of the buildings with the buildings oriented closer to the major roadway to promote traditional urban development. 2. Residential uses are allowed within this Overlay. Permitted density shall be as determined through application of the Density Rating System, and applicable FLUE • Policies, except as provided below and except as may be limited by a zoning overlay. 3. Non - residential/non - commercial uses allowed within this Overlay include essential services; parks, recreation and open space uses; water - dependent and water - related uses; child care centers; community facility uses; safety service facilities; and utility and communication facilities. 4. Properties with access to US-41 East are allowed a maximum density of 12 residential units per acre. In order to be eligible for this higher density, the project must be integrated into a mixed -use development with access to existing neighborhoods and adjoining commercial properties and comply with the standards identified in Paragraph #8, below, except for mixed use projects developed within the "mini triangle" catalyst project site as identified on the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Map. The "mini triangle" project site is eligible for the maximum density of 12 units per acre, with development standards as contained in the Gateway Triangle Mixed Use District zoning overlay, adopted February 28, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06 -08), and amended December 14, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06 -63). For projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase, their density is limited to that allowed by the Density Rating System and applicable FLUE Policies, except as may be limited by a future zoning overlay. 5. Properties with access to Bayshore Drive, are allowed a maximum density of 12 residential units per acre. In order to be eligible for this higher density, the project must be integrated into a mixed -use development with access to existing neighborhoods and adjoining commercial and must comply with the • properties Words underlined are added; words sti—aek through are deleted. 6 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 • standards identified in Paragraph #8, below. For projects that do not comply with the requirements for this density increase, their density is limited to that allowed by the Density Rating System and applicable FLUE Policies, except as may be limited by a future zoning overlay. 6. For parcels currently within the boundaries of Mixed Use Activity Center #16, land uses will continue to be governed by the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict. A zoning overlay may be developed for these properties within the Mixed Use Activity Center to provide specific development standards. 7. Existing zoning districts for some properties within the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay allow uses, densities and development standards that are inconsistent with the uses, densities and development standards allowed within this Overlay. These properties are allowed to develop and redevelop in accordance with their existing zoning until such time as a zoning overlay is adopted which may limit such uses, densities and development standards. 8. To qualify for 12 dwelling units per acre, as provided for in paragraphs #4 and #5 above, mixed use projects within the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay must comply with the following standards: a. Buildings containing only commercial uses are limited to a maximum height of three stories. b. Buildings containing only residential uses are limited to a maximum height of three stories except such buildings are allowed a maximum height of four stories if said residential buildings are located in close proximity to US-41. c. Buildings containing mixed use (residential uses over commercial uses) are • limited to a maximum height of four stories. d. Hotels /motels will be limited to a maximum height of four stories. V. FoLoo- ,.,,.poses of this 0.,0.41 , o eh building story may be tip to 14 foot in height. r- purposes Vl {.illJ , e. For mixed -use buildings, commercial uses are permitted on the first two stories only g f. Each building containing commercial uses only is limited to a maximum building footprint of 20,000 square feet gross floor area. hr. g_ One or more zoning overlays may be adopted which may include more restrictive standards than listed above in Paragraphs a--g as =f. 9. For all properties outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area, any eligible density bonuses, as provided in the Density Rating System, are in addition to the eligible density provided herein. However, for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), only the affordable- workforce housing density bonus, as provided in the Density Rating System, is allowed in addition to the eligible density provided herein. For all properties, the maximum density allowed is that specified under Density Conditions in the Density Rating System. 10. A maximum of 388 dwelling units are permitted to be utilized in this Overlay for density bonuses, as provided in paragraphs #4 and #5 above, for that portion of the Overlay lying within the CHHA only. This 388 dwelling unit density bonus pool corresponds with the number of dwelling units previously entitled to the botanical gardens sites prior to their rezone in 2003 to establish the Naples Botanical Gardens PUD. The "mini triangle" catalyst project is not subject to this density bonus pool. • Words underlined are added; words s`_--d k `_hre;� '� are deleted. 7 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 11. The Botanical Garden, Inc. properties located in Section 23, Township 50 South, • Range 25 East, and shown on the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Map, shall be limited to non - residential uses except for caretaker, dormitory, and other housing integrally related to the Botanical Garden or other institutional and/or recreational open space uses. FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Future Land Use Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Center Maps Properties Consistent By Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12) [no further changes] FUTURE LAND USE MAP (countywide) • Expand Incorporated Areas to reflect City of Naples annexations of the Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; a portion of the Wilderness Country Club PUD commercial tract, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. • Correct South Golden Gate Estates NRPA boundary at US41, Port of the Islands and • at I -75: shift boundary north so it follows I -75, follows US41, and follows the south line of Sections 33, 34, 35, Township 51 South, Range 28 East (so is no longer over Port of the Islands Urban area). • Correct Agricultural/Rural boundary near US41 /CR29/Everglades City: shift boundary to west to run along CR29, to follow ACSC boundary, and to follow west Section line of Sections 28 & 33, Township 52 South, Range 29 East; and, shift boundary to south to follow US41. • Correct Ag/Rural -RLSA- Conservation boundary along CR850: remove jog along common line for Sections 8 & 9, Township 46 South, Range 28 East - from near southeast corner of Section 7, boundary should run along CR850 to the northeast. • In map legend, add Interchange symbol under Overlays and Special Features and label: "Interchange." FUTURE LAND USE MAP — MAP SERIES Activity Center Index Map. Revise Activity Center #18 boundary to match the boundary on Activity Center #18 Map, to reflect prior expansion in southeast quadrant. Revise Activity Center #14 boundary to reflect City of Naples annexation of the Bridges at Gordon River project, in southeast quadrant. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole - in -the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; and, Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road. • Words underlined are added; words sti -aek threuth are deleted. $ Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 • All Activity Center Maps. Revise to update underlying map features — zoning, lot/parcel creation, street names, etc. — and to reflect parcel development and generalized building footprints. Activity Center #12 Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Moorings Park, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; and, a church zoned RSF-4, on south side of Seagate Drive. Activity Center #14 Map. Revise Activity Center #14 boundary to reflect City of Naples annexation of the Bridges at Gordon River project, in southeast quadrant. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexation of a portion of Wilderness Country Club PUD commercial tract, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road. Map FLUE -10, Consistent by Policy Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway; a church zoned RSF -4, on south side of Seagate Drive; Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; and, Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road. Rivers and Floodplains Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in -the -Wall • Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. is Estuarine Bays Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. Soils Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in -the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. Existing Commercial Mineral Extraction Sites Map. Revise City of Naples boundary to reflect City of Naples annexations of Hole -in- the -Wall Golf Club, on east side of Goodlette -Frank Road; Collier Park of Commerce, on west side of Airport- Pulling Road; and, the Bridges at Gordon River project, on south side of Golden Gate Parkway. Words underlined are added; words are deleted. 9 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. CPSP- 2010 -2 Stewardship Overlay Map. • Amend to add additional approved Stewardship Sending Areas (SSAs 10 -15), as required by Policy 1.6 of the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, and to correct the boundaries of SSA 7. Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map Replace existing map with proposed map that reflects the latest hydrologic modeling, as required by Objective 1 of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element and subsequent policies, and Objective 3.3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and subsequent policies. • CPSP - 2010 -2 Exhibit A to CAO 11 -12 -10 G: \Comprehensive \COMP PLANNING GMP DATA \Comp Plan Amendments\2009 -2010 Combined Cycles petitions\2010 Cycle Petitions \CPSP - 2010-2 batch\Exhibit A Transmittal CPSP - 2010.2 dw/7 -26-10 8 9 -24 -10 8 11 -6 -10 8 11 -9-10 • Words underlined are added; words ^t=i —de_- `_hi—eiag are deleted. 10 Row of asterisks ( * ** * ** * * *) denotes break in text. N ( T 46 S I T 47 S I T 48 S I T 48 8 _o � z 3 a cn o a n s T 50 8 1 T 51 3 1 T 52 8 1 T 53 3 s - 7 7 W O �a G So j3 ui LL W Lim ■❑oW❑,:I El ®I- M � b s Ktl0 ¢» 99 <<P 3 ■ *■ 0 E ■ ❑■ ❑ ■ 1 ®■®3 Nil_ a J 3 W W � O W a � 2 J 0 3 x �1 65t w N yuN <�F �i 0a s MV3i ,x aJ LU 'A g °Y'o N N ' Z 7 O g Y W o w Yl .anwc °o Swop rv► F U N Q N O LU LLiwm U o cc 00' OJ ....... ,...... Sg F U Q u � � c» rm � Q 8 9i 1 S Li 1 S 64 1 S 64 1 c W N M W mza. � c 'ate- e M 4iy 1 O _• i.. x ' I I - 1 I d -_� tmnaYge SlmrxLi�3 -- -_. -. ____. •-� m�7 O� 2 N l o �aG NjextiCo Gulf of 8 09 1 8 t9 1 ( 3 Z9 1 S E9 1 EXHIBIT "A" CPSP- 2010 -2 R 25 E R 26 E LE CO I OR% C a 5 � X01 I P C� LEE CO COLLIER 8 9 1 11 111 C.R. 888 /20 17 1 7 8 9 10 ,t 12 15 n 14 iJ N a 2 m 4 i C.R. 846 C.R. 846 f za z6 5 u 29 xe z2 za ss 11 C -R. 862 J3 33 J5 0 � Ji 32 Sl b ]8 b C.R. 862 _ Y 1 n M 1 J 2 . p ]� Z N 0 s 13 10 12 9 , / 2 ] C.R. 896 C.R. 896 15 ,a ,J N O p r m }� •..Y] 2 n Z I9 r ?D 15 2, 22 2] 24 U 8 s �- I 26 xs C.R. 886 29 n zs 21 x` 33 l4 35 b Jt 32 33 b C.R. 856 I -75 S.R. 84 OR 4 a s 4 ] 9 , S.R. 84 ✓18 - 1a „ 12 ) 6 .6 1. b 12 6 0 O /17,6 i 1) 6 u a 3 C.R. 864 O 111 w 24 21 22 2J 9 2p 11 2z 2J 24 �. MIXED USE 6 INTERCHANGE ACTIVITY CENTER _ z INDEX MAP v za ss b zs 29 22 M 2 J5 0 1 MI. 2 MI. 3 MI. U b 31 32 SCALE - - -- 18 -- AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2005 (Ord. No. 2005 -03) AMENDED — JUNE 7, 2005 in (Ord. No. 2005 -25) u z e la I, GS ,2 'n *� N AMENDED OCTOBER 14, 2008 m f 13 18 vi 16 15 PREPARED BY: CIS /CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION DATE: 11/2010 FILE: ACCESS- INDEX- 2010.DWG R 25 E R 26 E — Ord. No. 2008 -59 a i 2 3 f u tt F � S ' —s F g 4 P-1 3nwrr arurt3 ' 4 1, �T /1 � � w vp Y pC N o B gi J W a U U 1, G (A C Q LL W U ;ll=LL (If 'tl'�) UtlOa �N(Tald/laOaaN 0110 O = I N a o � 31Po0 aMWO � ~� �V � 4 �T /1 � � w vp Y pC N o B N 0 W a U U m Q ° z upi F H F oil ¢ G (A C Q LL W U ;ll=LL (If 'tl'�) UtlOa �N(Tald/laOaaN 0110 O = I N a o � 31Po0 aMWO � ~� �V � 4 �T /1 � � w vp Y pC N o B c 0 W a � Q m Q ° z F H F oil ¢ a w o w gig c e G (A C Q LL W U ;ll=LL (If 'tl'�) UtlOa �N(Tald/laOaaN 0110 O = I N a o � 31Po0 aMWO � ~� �V � 4 a I' I 1` �p � f1 IIII�1111 1111111111 �_ fez __ __ __ fez �e7 WE __ __ __ __ In �e7 7A7 �A7 __ __ __ __ __ __ -� Z- F� H � v Q ■ E U C lowa ° a a� � zl P Ln 9 -- - 2 Lo --rte r w U W o m z d z z F R F� F pe F c .Fi J O y � mm Q SIMONE o� o v �C ■ 4 Y:'y C i U a Uy g ° 7 n a� LL� a LL� U aeermw veraw vuNA F F F x �l1 sp $ A � p � G a 3� mmavex revewe riA.e UC d C5 pJ k of a� y w 1I/1 K j�}"; f W � 0 Z a f" iii4 f .1 a u F w u 8 < W Im 4 U a Uy g ° 7 n a� LL� a LL� U aeermw veraw vuNA F F F x �l1 sp $ A � p � G a 3� mmavex revewe riA.e UC d C5 pJ k of a� y w 1I/1 �\ ) � k ! /� , ■ -. §)! )} ) ¥ , ! 2 (]! ,{ � §ne; �2 " §/ �§ § !. «§ /® \2§ < J j | �� | ( .. : A� | � °| — � — - --a \| :| �| ■ | | § � ° ------ -- — - [ � /� � H ^ as wtio�i P 6 V S F F 0 , mag a ---- -- - - - - -� i ° '-----------� P � H 8 da �1Li � � o U 3 W 01 '� i� ZEE IWj V Q W o N <e z o z 1 w ag > y u F� sill < TTI i� la � - plNi�i4Ui ` o• A oil 1�� 0 i ►' 111 M■ ■ , � C All I !■Ic]n■u■u■i � ` �ir ■rUt ■r0 �� : k 9 � 11►t11111111411 10 ililllll �jl ll 11 m■��nu _= = 3 E �' t rinnr� uu �mr■�■ nnn'iui -.■�■n ■u■lau■ C:: �� - iT■i�ii�nm ► f ��w•� � 1�■rtr■n -:� . arms :2 -- �, � w � /111111111111 ON 1 WA FOR 1 HIS �1111�,1�1 11111111111 ��1 /111111111111111111 - 1111111: �J11111111, a' F g Z z W a u r � o t 4 Q a d If 5 W ft 1 �naa Noaneu a�° a �a NNYa cm 'a']) atlas aNMI -I—aw ^ avow wne vaavavovr oll azra aam+vno �• ? � � " � T � avoa �oiae oavanmd h 3 IL llC NNY'J (tt 'a'o) atlas 'JNTM-laadaN i CL sM o CL a m � 3 r N � s Ln t W O W ° S�e ^ avow wne vaavavovr oll azra aam+vno �• ? � � " � T � avoa �oiae oavanmd h 3 IL llC NNY'J (tt 'a'o) atlas 'JNTM-laadaN i CL sM o CL a m I MON r, 1811■ • �� t �� 101 IF I mm M ME 0 ME mm ME �� ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■■ � � i 11 is . ■ ii iN i■ ■■ ■■ % jQ i ii . . '� ■ ■■ ■IF ■■ ■■ ■ .� .�i'.. 1 1�1 ■ t E�_� 9 � IIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIi� �� WOMEN m Olson How VS LIM cs an emm ,�� h � _ �� ■iii ■ t w/, W] LA ;: �. SIC Q ►•�•• ;� �11 IN ILi1ttN� .�,�, � �� ci LA ;: �. SIC Q ►•�•• ;� �11 IN ILi1ttN� .�,�, � �� u `- f— Q I� I Q: I � B e UL 1p b7 QIOM MM'Y. - 3LL3g000 Ke h � PIOtl fNYM! iLLf1UJC! 13b1f lllfl 1 pq� 3LLL6 M I' L� k o� W ° 2 � V = � > < a 0. F 4 c g e INN ■■ Ii ■ ■l� ■ go mill go IBM I INN 1 I 1 ■ ■ goolloo 1-- ■- -moll oil ■ ERA v �� 1 j j ■■��'� VSO ■ - - a Y s° o �s oa° maR no lie N M p C H aO Z N Z W m V z z Q O �Z W J v Z r o ■ ERA v �� 1 j j ■■��'� VSO ■ - - a Y s° o �s oa° maR no r' 1 i o. 0 o mom M1 ccI ■■0 ■ ac mn INK °7NI N1111 HIM Ma1M111C °�INIiIN �' �� 111111111111 � �i�� MINI MII ICI s`.: 1111 � � � • ■� MMII �IIINM�I�i� =� M ■li � � '�� N - r w W a � z 'o MYi � c � o a �ngc a � a - �:: =::: ... i■ No ME . ■■■. C■ UN !off Lroll MINE No ■ .. .■ .. E no �.. ON -.0 —� ii ii ii on o� aj \ � § z!: _ ��- _ ,§§■ . � z Z ! � | ®| < *� - » |� 14� � | , � � m ■� \ ¥ , / Q ��r q � | ■ - �| ! � / w _ Rig ) i ♦ ��Vp1111r1� ,� ��pllllll _II.IrI P ■•�■ ■ ■■ unnm nuuw, � / ,� �� • 11 11 111 1�1 unnuuuuum � �♦ / ► � � ■ JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII ° . � � � �� •../ IInm1- ununnnuuunu C � " �' � � � � � � �U G � � uuuu III moon —= p � I /111 ►� ' � � s,• ♦ ► �� / � .. noon t I nom WIN, - ■11�� ♦ nom nuunn = � � C► �� Q d= 111111�11� � � muu li unuun 3: �! � G �■ � �1 � G �n �� • • uunnuuuu uw =� GI � � , �i�a!�, ; G G G� °nom _ _ =■ � _ ♦�r'�.� t111� VA��1I w•L p� tiu i•� =: ��i � ♦I.►� 11 �� 1111: / / /Iil „Iilll \\ z � �. M 1 BE pp• 1 11� =z� 1 111, C GE E M 111 1 =E alr�lll == == 11 �mmu��1 � = Ilitu 5 6b 1 =131 I - -- - -- - — -_ — - P IU 1 Jf -1 T N II g "s W N @ t l0 N Ln tt 1_{ a a J N� y d� L� C N o P o W LL W - -- - - - -� V P . a z lz s L— U. a toai - a 3 "� �Wa -- \ Ll H o zi 3 g un o s J Z L Z g — s a Z '• !� W N @ —13 v ,/ •mss g N Ln l7 3 LL_ ate. 4 ` m W Z N m K — d W fol h F R T495 Q F CD x w i BROWARD COUNTY DADE COUNTY i COWER COUNTY COWER COUNTY iE Qz Q J 3K O Z Q N N Z Q K awoaH °a u°�i3..i Q -O OYNK�K�2' w •L � Olw w « a�3wwawMm M O O a J Q L-E- Z W w 4 7 z ++ c U U � Q J :5 W J Y < v� O U w ow- W O w Y U K?> L •� w Z�xKW 1 E- OwKZO�L) - n/ O LL U Q¢ZOYO��Qa3W W Z xU S J3 j 000<,ZOUU cc =i m Li �N17Q�t0 Is m Ern i ^ - r r Z Z O O U U W O - KKZ O O U � 0 w y N w o 0 o sz "a's o < a x U Z 'Z' O U = WWrc r WV r a 0 = O = OD m DQ� a U r �Va�2 o 00 m <o * O < N ? TO o W Q 61 0 J' ^ CO 40 o c0� SL -I w z Uoa< < 4 F z 3 o X Z \o oa U < n ao w two Z m o 0 0 0 oZ a. 0 w 0 N N nm ^m «m p o5= p J (7 = UZJ O Q N <0 m0 ZN �t�V NZw o I U Z v z oz 8w ,<- V j m < N �U.10 WQO Oi\ Z K < < W o Fw- I,< LL O .00 a m W j BROWARD COUNTY DADE COUNTY I COWER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY a- C/) rr }¢ } mm Q mm} ¢ m m o< Z m r r m m O m O U Z m m a }g. LLI z z,o zw m am3Zm oanzw Jop � 2 MM w >1 z �oa�>jaama�� uo'Lmma"Wm 0 7 C LLI n'N�tl mOf O.-NMO N z L ::3 /^ NNNNN J Q J y r r} < <y} N m m«mm <mmmm mm m k � ° �m�NdWW ZZ O_W co U YQO(�R�O =�JYOW¢ vI U 1 O a 0 0 0 a z 0¢ W SO2 °� F-�Oam U LL h4 610h 666 �N 10 r i F Fr- Z 2 O U U W O J z U aw M N N N o w 0 Z Z sa 'a 'S ° o a U U r K W W (Z. K W_ z J S U a O N D N o ptj Qn � gad a � � o .0 a co m r Q Q OD ^�O vi J o z m � � N r � O � U co � O � Z w W n ¢ J O O o CD 0 Z O V 'A ova Fz3 U¢° U.S 41 in u> U �J ° uJ o U' \N a O N N W X N N ¢NI W r O W Ua 2 O 0 I K I ¢ w J J < o m o w W U O Q u7 z N O N O W O WO N z z Q °_ v 1 9 m Q 0 p °a ¢ a� �K¢ DR pF LEGEND SOILS OF THE MANMADE AREAS /❑. UREANOM — UDDRR,ENTS — WINGER ASSOCMnON SODS OF THE TIDAL AREAS 2 DURBIN — WULFERr — CAfUVERAL ASSOCIATION 3. IO:SSON — ANCLOTE — PECKISH ASSOCIATION SOILS OF THE SWAMPS, PRAIRIES AND FRESHWATER MARSHES 4. OCHOPEE — PppIST1CO ASSOCIA710N 5. RMFAA — BOG — COPELAND ASSOCIATION B. WINDEat — RMERA — CNDBEE ASSOCIATION SOILS OF THE FLATWOOOS. SLOUGHS AND HAMMOCKS 7. PINEDA — BDCA — HAUMDALE ASSOCIATON 8 MMOKNIX EXHIBIT "A" CPSP -201 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SOILS Western Collier County, Florida HENDRY COUNTY 10 SR 8Z 8 10 6 8 10 v 6 8 N 10 10 8 10 10 6 INMOKALEE 6 10 cAKC 1 i CR 84 9 6 10 0 6 6 8 10 10 — WINGER — OLDSMAR ASSOCIATION 5 8 6 6 9. HOLOPAW — WINGER — MMOKALEE ASSOCIATION CR 846 5 tO. WASASSO - WINDER - HOLOPAW ASSOCIATION 10 10 10 10 PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS LEGEND AND ATTACHED GENERAL SOILS AMP ARE PRELIMINARY ORAFIS. MNOR AOA61T�N15 6 5 ARE LIKELY BEFORE PUBLICATgN. 1 5 8 8 2 LEE COUNTY 8 8 6 8 m 8 7 5 5 v 9 CR 858 0 8 1 g 8 CR 846 7 6 8 9 7 7 8 7 6 1 9 7 9 5 7 5 7 r — - - - 5 s — TS s I 9 I 7 y B 1 9 7 6 71 7 BIG 1 9 5 61 7 1 5 CYPRESS 7 q I 9 I SWAMP 7 1 Ts 4 CITY OF SR 84 9 I NAPLES 7 r 9 7 1 5 7 4 ¢avLl7v 7 I O gars 9 5 4 I (n O 5 7 it 2 g 5 s 4 j C STRAW < 7 5 7 S 9 9 7 I A4ilrGPY 41 9 4 5 I Y 5 I m 2 rn 3 5 7 I H 4 1 n � 9 5 5 4 4 4J ° 4 5 4 I I CITY 1 3 4 I OF 3 I MARCO ISLAND �+r 1 2 3 4 4 4 1 O i I 3 I SCALE 2 r- - - - - -� f� 0 5M1. I I r —i IEVERC s i r_� 1 ADOPTED — JANUARY 25, 2007 2 CITY 2 I Ord. No. 2007 -18 I I AMENDED — OCTOBER 14, 2008 Ord. No. 2008 -59 I L� I ` SOURCE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE, JUNE 1988 EACH AREA OUTLINED ON THIS MAP CONSISTS OF PREPARED BY: GIS /CAD MAPPING SECTION MORE THAN ONE KIND OF SOIL. THE MAP IS THUS GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION MEANT FOR GENERAL PLANNING RATHER THAN A BASIS DATE: 11/2010 FILE: LU- 94- 2010.DWG FOR DECISIONS ON THE USE OF SPECIFIC TRACTS. O N i W Q W z — cn Q �W a Lli J� V) Q 0' Q 4' z W- i U co � U U .Q) O CD X LL. W v z_ V / X W )I- 1�: >> O U � W p J Z J W O 2 U • N co • U `t • O Y O 4 N F • t0 M • • ID d U • t` i 00 N BROWARD COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY sz 'a's • • U.S. 4-f C too vA f " w c O Z W o 0 0 v DADE COUNTY COWER Y z z U U W O J � O O U � W W Y N O O W o Q U U W V oD4 p 4Q� ° � o oQ� I�Q Q IJO D j v v ZO w Li Ir p Q 7 o O of U W Q O 02 w3 C) X z z zoo l QZ--Q W o c�i� co Lo Ix U Q \ O c� z VI O a r a En U ww~ cn W U Y p a rn W W rz- Q'Z<W-� o J of < Z J W Q U N _ :2 W O U Z Q F- (nmCSrn Q W r V M a u� O z • N co • U `t • O Y O 4 N F • t0 M • • ID d U • t` i 00 N BROWARD COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY sz 'a's • • U.S. 4-f C too vA f " w c O Z W o 0 0 v DADE COUNTY COWER Y z z U U W O J � O O U � W W Y N O O W o Q U U W V oD4 p 4Q� ° � o oQ� I�Q Q IJO D j v v o F O w Ud z Q U Z Z 020 Fz3 0 O W J p /� o n. O \N �, L)z O O dZ N7 UOgV_JI N N QV)� Z5::) N a N p 0 O U W } I I W m Q N W Q N j N o� N (� Z N W O (n <Z OZ } Q O j I I m N O o Q p Q O\ Q z W ix Q °a a wtoa o ac�p Ell EXHIBIT "A" PETITION CPSP - 2010 -2 IDS COLLIER COUNTY RURAL & AGRICULTURAL AREA ASSESSMENT STEWARDSHIP OVERLAY MAP legend AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 20D7 bd. No. 2007 -18 op. - 5008 R.MM Z.- AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 Q' d. No, 2008 -59 WMM Retembn Arne (WRA) 8p Cy, w NWm W Forest FI / y SW Mdetep Nee (FSA) Am of Cftwl Slate Cenpem O- - HW *tM Sie —dot p Aq (H8JU Slewardahip Rewi w Area (SRA) PREPARED BY: OS /CAD MAPPMC SECIM Mo. MANAGEMENT OIMSION / PLANNNG AND REWLARIXI "� ® %- .IBhip Sending A— (SW DAM: _10 /2010 FILE: CCRAAASOM- 2010 -2.OWC COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRs ID LI'VINGSTON ROAD ASR (IRRIGATION DUALITY) CITY OF NAPLES ASR (4 WELL PERMITS) 0 SCALE 0 5M1. AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 200 Ord. No. 2003 -44 AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007 -18 AMENDED — DECEMBER 4, 2007 Ord. No. 2007 -82 L x rn FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL Elf < UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN L? ,; GATE CITY WELLFIELD SOUTH HAWTHORN WELLFIELD EXTENSION LMARCO ISLAND UTILITIES ASR (G WELL PERMITS) L0 MANATEE �> ROAD ASP. 6? L� PREPARED BY: GIS /CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY POLLUTION CONTROL AND PP,EVEI%JnON DEPT. DATE: 9/2010 FILE: WFP7Rl2- 2010.D`NG PETITION CPSP -2010 N IMMOKALEE WELLFIELD CR 846 CR 546 AVE MARIA f WELLFIELD CR 858 POTENTIAL FUTURE COLLIER COUNTY WELLFIELD AREA \\CITY OF NAPLES EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD I -;5 G LEGEND PLANNED WATER CR 846F/-7/,, ; a II ASR = AQUIFER STORAGE i AND RECOVERY SITE G POTENTIAL FUTURE J CV WELLFIELD AREA cc NTY W ' G. BEV N APLES ES Li EC Ir • COASTAL v l( RIDGE i I ? PINE \ � COLLIER ((`� VELLFIELD OUNTY RIDGE UTILITIES GOLDEN GATE PI VY WELLFIELD CITY OF NAPLES ASR (4 WELL PERMITS) 0 SCALE 0 5M1. AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 200 Ord. No. 2003 -44 AMENDED — JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. No. 2007 -18 AMENDED — DECEMBER 4, 2007 Ord. No. 2007 -82 L x rn FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL Elf < UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN L? ,; GATE CITY WELLFIELD SOUTH HAWTHORN WELLFIELD EXTENSION LMARCO ISLAND UTILITIES ASR (G WELL PERMITS) L0 MANATEE �> ROAD ASP. 6? L� PREPARED BY: GIS /CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY POLLUTION CONTROL AND PP,EVEI%JnON DEPT. DATE: 9/2010 FILE: WFP7Rl2- 2010.D`NG PETITION CPSP -2010 N IMMOKALEE WELLFIELD CR 846 CR 546 AVE MARIA f WELLFIELD CR 858 POTENTIAL FUTURE COLLIER COUNTY WELLFIELD AREA \\CITY OF NAPLES EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD I -;5 G LEGEND PLANNED WATER DO SUPPLY WELLS V) ASR = AQUIFER STORAGE w AND RECOVERY SITE G POTENTIAL FUTURE WELLFIELD AREA CV WELLFIELD AREA cc W Li PORT OF THE ISLANDS �i WELLFIELD i i bS �t EVERGLADES CITY" WELLFIELD c; :n LEGEND PLANNED WATER SUPPLY WELLS ASR = AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY SITE POTENTIAL FUTURE WELLFIELD AREA WELLFIELD AREA EVERGLADES CITY" WELLFIELD c; :n