The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Backup 12/02/2010 Rccpc REGULAR MEETING BACKUP DOCUMENTS DECEMBER 12010 AGENDA *REVISED* COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2010, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - November 4, 2010 6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS — 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- PL2010 -1194 FOR AN 8 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 -FOOT LIMIT IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 28 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE TWO VESSELS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 28 AND 29, BAYFRONT GARDENS SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner) B. RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- PL2010 -1297 FOR A 26 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 -FOOT LIMIT IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 46 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE TWO BOAT LIFTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 10 AND 11 IN THE REPLAT OF UNIT 3, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES SUBDIVISION IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner) C. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A GOLF DRIVING RANGE WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.03.01. A.l.c.17 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR 29.6 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6500 AIRPORT ROAD NORTH IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner] D. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 05 -235 (DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 05 -01), AS AMENDED, FOR THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ( "DRI ") LOCATED IN SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER BY REVISING EXHIBIT C: SRA MASTER PLAN TO DIVIDE TOWN CENTER 2 INTO TOWN CENTER 2a AND TOWN CENTER 2b, TO RELOCATE TOWN CENTER 2b TO OIL WELL ROAD AND TO RELOCATE AN ACCESS POINT ON OIL WELL ROAD; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDERS, TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. CONTINUED FROM THE NOVEMBER 4, 2010 CCPC MEETING (PETITION DOA- PL2010 -1751) COMPANION ITEM TO SRAA- PL2010 -1988 [COORDINATOR: KAY DESELEM. PRINCIPAL PLANNER] E. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBERS 2004 -89 AND 2005 -234A FOR THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA STEWARDSHIP RECEIVING AREA TO REVISE THE SRA MASTER PLAN TO DIVIDE TOWN CENTER 2 INTO TOWN CENTER 2A AND TOWN CENTER 2B; TO RELOCATE TOWN CENTER 2B TO OIL WELL ROAD AND TO RELOCATE AN ACCESS POINT ON OIL WELL ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF OIL WELL ROAD AND WEST OF CAMP KEAIS ROAD IN SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PETITION SRAA- PL2010- 1988) ) COMPANION ITEM TO DOA- PL2010 -1751 [Coordinator: Kay Deselem, Principal Planner] 10. OLD BUSINESS A. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO THE DECEMBER 16, 2010 MEETING PER STAFF'S REQUEST. PRESENTATION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE [Coordinator: Mac Hatcher] 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 14. ADJOURN 11/16/2010 CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows /jmp Cam] ;U 8A • Friday, November 12, 2010 • Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held ment Review prior to December 2, 2010, in order to be by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at considered at the public hearing. All materials used in 8:30 A.M.. Thursday, December 2 2010 in the Board presentation before the CCPC will become a permanent of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Ad- part of the record and will be available for presentation to ministration Building, Collier Government Center, 3301 the Board of County Commissioners, if applicable. East Tamiami Trail, Naples Florida to consider: RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- PL2010 -1194 FOR AN 8 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTEN- SION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 -FOOT LIMIT IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOP- MENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 28 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE TWO VESSELS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 28 AND 29, IN THE BAYFRONT GARDENS SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner). All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Expert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes each. Persons who have been authorized to represent a group or organization should limit their presentation to ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Department of Zoning and Land Develop- TT £ LEE COUNTY "'cRY C.R. BBB) BONITA BEACH R a"REOOT PROJECT BEA1I coNOO LOCATION LELY � NRITA BAREFOOT 6 5 ES _ BEACH AUDUBON CA CWNTRY _ t� mu" LEE COUNTY _ `+f �� AUDUBON. NAPM COUNTRY DES BAY",- 'K LARBOR—CE OANS s AK o THE L ES RETREAT PLAZA MEADOW BROOR ESTATE NIA. PLACE Js Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which includes all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Planning Commission Collier County, Florida Mark P. Strain, Chairman No. 231188457 November 12 2010 AGENDA ITEM 9 -A Co e-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2010 SUBJECT: BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Maryann Kriger Agent: Quin Kurth 205 Bayfront Drive Kurth Consulting, LLC Naples, FL 34134 4470 5h Avenue NW Naples, FL 34119 REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting an 8 -foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which will allow expansion of an existing boat dock facility. The completed facility will protrude a total of 28 feet into a waterway that is 153 feet wide. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 205 Bayfront Drive, in the Bayfront'Gardens subdivision, further described as Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject site currently has an existing boat dock facility that accommodates 1 vessel and protrudes 28 feet into the waterway. The purpose of the project is to remove a portion of the existing dock which consists of a 20 -foot x 5 -foot floating dock and replace it with a fixed 40 -foot x 5 -foot fixed dock. This will expand the dock northward by 20 feet and will also accommodate a boat lift. The proposed boat dock will have the same 28 -foot protrusion that the existing dock has into the 153 -foot waterway. The existing dock was allowed pursuant to a boat dock extension (BD- 94 -22, Resolution number: 95 -5). The BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 1 of 8 November 10, 2010 l \� LELY or BAREFOOT eEACx Rkj k LOCATION MAP 93 78 9 80 91 51 94 BD 77 BD 52 45 BS 78 53 44 BD BD 96 75 PUD BD 54 BD 43 BD BD 31 BD BD 74 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH 55 42 PB BD 30 B 35 BD4 33 32 7J BD 72 y SB JB BD 29 71 57 37 BD BD 58 28 X0.0 70 y 38 59 2] B p D BD 100 S2C9 69 g 41 0 'w 3B V' 26 TRACT 8 101 OPT 68 81 SAN MATE W 25 D COMMUNITY 67 el 65 64 63 62 1e o BD RECREATION 102 t1 BD BD 19 v 24 CENTER 10J JE 0 Bo COtS 1w 16 SOUTHPORT Q z3 11 12 ,3 14 BD 105 g 10 106 BB BID BD BD BD 22 BD , CO e p 20 2 s01/THP�� 7 D 21 3 8 BD BD 4 5 30 31 D7 9¢1 BD „- . 8D 32 LITTLE HICKORY 4 5 F ®, v 33 BAY .... ] A� BD 27 k:� • 9 8 Yy BD 26 p 25 [Y tPo 1 24 3 4 5 C G�1L 2 23 34 O�h1 SITE 7 r BD BD 22 LOCATION 8 3 BO 21 1 0 N\O`P �• Boa LITTLE BD 20 12 H�— HICKORY 8D 1 1 2 3 4 5 8 BAY y ] BD 18 O e B V 09 5 0 $ 1217 �PNE e D 17 tJ 1NPCUP 7 BD to o1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BD 15 e 14 BID D B 1 11 72 BD 12 1 13 B P 17 ENIC CPV t,N n tt 1 2 3 4 5 8 O7 � B TRACT g A TRACT 10 P 12 1t 13, K2 3P %- 5 3 9 5 8 ZONING MAP PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -1194 PROJECT RC PELICAN VA" OER9ILT BEACN LOCATION MAR B (DRI) 32 ROAD 35 33 WALGREENS BONITA —ER WE VRLAs VEKW AN 5 sNOxES /LEE LEIIURIA AUDUBON oCOUNTRY NOiT1 NAPLES PINE CLUB RESEAPCH ! IT NDLOGY PAAOUNTY (D4 RIDGE e MONTEREV2 1\ 4 3 S EMERALD �I AUDUBON NA- N ASt ARBOAt LAKES BAY COUNTE L. OUB SIERONG WE UB CLUB NEOITEPM 8 FOREST OAKS 9 � 10 11 WO WATEROADES RETREAT PLAZA M6ROOK ON�Nl11EBAY ARBOR TRACE NLLAGE PLACE ESTATES - -- _ VETERANS MEMORIAL SLVO, C ATCKE AY COCOMAICXEE TARPON IAWKMA RWERIAL 1 ex KU BAY 18 COVE PLAZA us -41/"1 S LINES C.R. BBB PASS ROAD 14 7 WICGMS g C I l/ LINE KPEN AT T IMPERIAL .—L WroONS IMPEPoµ INDUS MIES BAY GERMAN nvE WEST T COCO ATCHEE w R COCOHATCNDE PoVER TRUST TAMIA41 PROFESSOIAL CENTER VANDERBILT 27 I NCRTM 23 TO NLLAS COLLIER 22 e"LLER MEDICAL 111E > TRACT 21 COLLI ER CENIEP DUNES MA A 21 TRACT ?2 SW PROF. EA (DTI) NEALIN FLAK NEIERAN's NAPLE54N1MOKALEE RCI PARK COMMONS NORTI- COVENTRY ORANA A CREEKSIDE SNORE SOUARE ST. JgiN SMOPP 5 CD4MEPCE / PARK SiRn v 29 NLLAS THE EVANGELIST CATNL. C-11 NAPLES VE IRAN'S NNV�ALFBCOR NORTMAOE DALY ME P TFq MEDICAL (S) :RBI LT 48A'. 28 27 26 STATES NAPLES 9 .- sTONEBRIDOE PARK < H, PELCAN LOCATION MAP 93 78 9 80 91 51 94 BD 77 BD 52 45 BS 78 53 44 BD BD 96 75 PUD BD 54 BD 43 BD BD 31 BD BD 74 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH 55 42 PB BD 30 B 35 BD4 33 32 7J BD 72 y SB JB BD 29 71 57 37 BD BD 58 28 X0.0 70 y 38 59 2] B p D BD 100 S2C9 69 g 41 0 'w 3B V' 26 TRACT 8 101 OPT 68 81 SAN MATE W 25 D COMMUNITY 67 el 65 64 63 62 1e o BD RECREATION 102 t1 BD BD 19 v 24 CENTER 10J JE 0 Bo COtS 1w 16 SOUTHPORT Q z3 11 12 ,3 14 BD 105 g 10 106 BB BID BD BD BD 22 BD , CO e p 20 2 s01/THP�� 7 D 21 3 8 BD BD 4 5 30 31 D7 9¢1 BD „- . 8D 32 LITTLE HICKORY 4 5 F ®, v 33 BAY .... ] A� BD 27 k:� • 9 8 Yy BD 26 p 25 [Y tPo 1 24 3 4 5 C G�1L 2 23 34 O�h1 SITE 7 r BD BD 22 LOCATION 8 3 BO 21 1 0 N\O`P �• Boa LITTLE BD 20 12 H�— HICKORY 8D 1 1 2 3 4 5 8 BAY y ] BD 18 O e B V 09 5 0 $ 1217 �PNE e D 17 tJ 1NPCUP 7 BD to o1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BD 15 e 14 BID D B 1 11 72 BD 12 1 13 B P 17 ENIC CPV t,N n tt 1 2 3 4 5 8 O7 � B TRACT g A TRACT 10 P 12 1t 13, K2 3P %- 5 3 9 5 8 ZONING MAP PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -1194 PAMON RC PELICAN VA" OER9ILT BEACN MAR B (DRI) 32 ROAD 35 33 WALGREENS —ER WE VRLAs VEKW AN PLAZA LEIIURIA PELICAN BAY PINE g (D4 RIDGE e MONTEREV2 4 3 S EMERALD HEAVENLY Q � LAKES LOCATION MAP 93 78 9 80 91 51 94 BD 77 BD 52 45 BS 78 53 44 BD BD 96 75 PUD BD 54 BD 43 BD BD 31 BD BD 74 LELY BAREFOOT BEACH 55 42 PB BD 30 B 35 BD4 33 32 7J BD 72 y SB JB BD 29 71 57 37 BD BD 58 28 X0.0 70 y 38 59 2] B p D BD 100 S2C9 69 g 41 0 'w 3B V' 26 TRACT 8 101 OPT 68 81 SAN MATE W 25 D COMMUNITY 67 el 65 64 63 62 1e o BD RECREATION 102 t1 BD BD 19 v 24 CENTER 10J JE 0 Bo COtS 1w 16 SOUTHPORT Q z3 11 12 ,3 14 BD 105 g 10 106 BB BID BD BD BD 22 BD , CO e p 20 2 s01/THP�� 7 D 21 3 8 BD BD 4 5 30 31 D7 9¢1 BD „- . 8D 32 LITTLE HICKORY 4 5 F ®, v 33 BAY .... ] A� BD 27 k:� • 9 8 Yy BD 26 p 25 [Y tPo 1 24 3 4 5 C G�1L 2 23 34 O�h1 SITE 7 r BD BD 22 LOCATION 8 3 BO 21 1 0 N\O`P �• Boa LITTLE BD 20 12 H�— HICKORY 8D 1 1 2 3 4 5 8 BAY y ] BD 18 O e B V 09 5 0 $ 1217 �PNE e D 17 tJ 1NPCUP 7 BD to o1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BD 15 e 14 BID D B 1 11 72 BD 12 1 13 B P 17 ENIC CPV t,N n tt 1 2 3 4 5 8 O7 � B TRACT g A TRACT 10 P 12 1t 13, K2 3P %- 5 3 9 5 8 ZONING MAP PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -1194 petitioner is requesting this boat dock extension in order to allow the proposed dock configuration. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: The site currently has a single - family home with a single boat dock, zoned PUD SURROUNDING: North: Waterway, then a single - family homes with docks, zoned PUD East: Waterway, then a single - family home with a dock, zoned PUD South: Bayfront Drive right -of -way, then preserve, zoned PUD West: single - family home, zoned PUD Aerial photo taken from Collier County Property Appraiser website. BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 3 of 8 November 9, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Services staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 5.03.06(E)(11) (Manatee Protection) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) is applicable to all multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) or more slips. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria. In order for the CCPC to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 and finds the following: Primary Criteria Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single - family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi- family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed facility will consist of two boat slips, which is appropriate in relation to the 300 -foot waterfront length of the property. The subject property is zoned PUD, and there is an existing single - family home. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion not met. According to the application submitted by the petitioner, the water depth at the site is not an issue. (An extension is needed to minimize impacts to existing mangroves.) The water depth is sufficient to launch and moor a vessel. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) BD- PI,2010 -1 194. KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 4 of 8 November 9. 2010 Criterion met. According to the application submitted by the petitioner, there will be no impact on any navigable channel. The proposed dock is not located within a navigable channel. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. According to the survey provided by the petitioner, the waterway is 153 feet wide at the site. The proposed facility will occupy about 18 percent of the waterway width, leaving more than 50 percent of the waterway width for navigation. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the proposed facility will not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. According to the application, the property is situated along a natural mangrove shoreline. The extension is necessary in order to minimize impacts to existing mangroves that extend approximately 20 feet into the waterway. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loadinglunloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. As shown on the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the deck area is not excessive. The applicant has requested a 5 -foot x 40 -foot walkway extension to an existing 7 -foot x 25 -foot dock. 3. For single - family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 5 of 8 November 9, 2010 Criterion met. The subject property contains 300 feet of water - frontage, and the vessels listed in the application are 35 and 21 feet, or 56 feet in combination, consisting of approximately 19 percent of the waterfront footage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock facility will not impact the view of the neighboring property owners. The subject property and neighboring properties have a mangrove shoreline that provides buffering between the uplands development and visibility of the waterway. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. A site inspection by an environmental specialist has determined that no seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(I1) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(I1) must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. Staff analysis indicates that the request meets four of the five primary criteria and six of the six secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the CCPC takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Administrator within 30 days of the action by the CCPC. In the event that the petition has been approved by the CCPC, the applicant shall be advised that he /she proceeds with construction at his /her own risk during this 30 -day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BD- PL2010 -1194 revised on 11/8/10. —SW BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 6 of 8 November 10, 2010 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition BD- PL2009 -1194. Attachment: A. Pictures from site visit BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 7 of 8 November 10, 2010 �l w S I 20[,D NANCY 4 LA H, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DA DEPART LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: RAYMOtID V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES V, & _,,,. (1- !o ZLw )OJLIAM D. LO NZ J ., P.E., DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY NICK CASALANG II)A,'OiKU ADMINISTRATOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN BD- PL2010 -1194, KRIGER BOAT DOCK EXT. Page 8 Of 8 November 8. 2010 DATE Standing on existing subject dock and looking east to bome and boat dock approximately 150 feet away. Existing Boat Lift and portion of the dock. ATTACHMENT A CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 10- RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- PL2010- 1194 FOR AN 8 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 -FOOT LIMIT IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 28 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE TWO VESSELS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 28 AND 29 IN THE BAYFRONT GARDENS SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance 04-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held a properly noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of an 8 -foot extension over the maximum 20 -foot limit provided in LDC Section 5.03.06 to allow for a 28 -foot boat dock facility in the Lely Barefoot Beach PUD for property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 5.03.06; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Commission at a public hearing, and the Commission has considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition Number BD- PL2010 -1194, filed on behalf of Maryann Kriger by Quin Kurth of Kurth Consulting, LLC, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lots 28 and 29, Bayfront Gardens, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 114 through 117 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida Kriger Boat Dock / BD- PL2010 -1 194 Page 1 of 2 10/19/10 .- be and the same is hereby approved for an 8 -foot extension of a boat dock over the maximum 20- foot limit to allow for a 28 -foot boat dock facility as shown on the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A ", in the zoning district wherein said property is located. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this ATTEST: day of Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator Growth Managcment/Planning & Regulation Division Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Steven T.Williams �0 Assistant County Attorney 4 .- Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Site Plan CP \10- CPS - 01053 \1 l 2010. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Mark P. Strain, Chairman Kriger Boat Dock / BD- PL2010 -1194 Page 2 of 2 10/19/10 M x a' rt I3 SITE LOCATION STATE QF FLOMM COLLIER COUNTY Kurth Consulting; LLC Marine Design and Permitting Tclepboat .3399 4470 Rh.Aveaw NW Email: qka. .,ail.com Naples F1. 34119 2 . � �lce -. —._ ...._,.�,__Bonita Be t; 1 I T_ T �tJ ` t r. r,P q� Kriger LOTS 28 `9 Water Depths 205 BAYFRONT Dk c, BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA Aerial map Nrrt rn y�� B/IREFO07' ' usBEpCH 0. $i Bm 4 V is in it� map Kriger LOTS 28 `9 Water Depths 205 BAYFRONT Dk c, BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA Aerial map Nrrt rn y�� EXISTING 300 Linear Feet of shoreline Approx. 310 square feet of overwater structure Total Protrusion 28' From MHW Line X •8.5 X -9a X .6.9 X -9.4 X-5,2 X .7A X A.9 X as X -2 -� z1 X•6.6 X .7 .0 X , X X �.a .6 Existing 20'x5' Floating dock, -2.9 X-3.6 X-6.9 X-7.8 X .9.6 .8 X -,.0 X -,2 X• 2 X •7.6 _ X -1.2 .1 X-8.6 X X •7 X'9.7 X 3 X-6.3 X 7 X g -9.6 -2j Xa.s Up to 21' Vessel ,.z / ' \ •1.8 .,.7 X•k2 -6.0 X 7 X -2.6 X -es Aprox. MLW Line \ \ \ ` \ -,. X •7.9 X•9.9 Existing (25'x7') / Approx. MHW Line 'A � 9 X-5-9 Fixed wood dock XX / \ X.6.9 rA \ 7' X 3.,X 3.7 X -6.9X 4.2 J X 3.6 y OA Property Line , X X -3.8 z. \ ,.a X, s , -,_, 2 . 2� Edge of Mangroves '� X �.X��\ k o 3.9 � Platted Control Line MHW Line By P I Kurth Consulting, LLC Manne Design and Permitting Telephone: 239.450.3599 4470 RhAmuc N W Email g4,wth.a_amail.com Naples, Fl, 34119 Kriger 1 i LOTS 28 & 24 Water Depths 205 BAYFRONT DRIVE, BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA Bottom of Rip Rap FIRC 5/8" (No ID #) SENCHMAI SET PKNA Top Rip Rap EL. = 5.1: i H f 2 Scale I " -30' Approx. Edge of Mangrove Bottom of Ripe <FIR 518" O ID #) a Control Line � Top Of Rip Rap Approx. MHW — LOT 27 40'x5' Fixed Dock Addition Metal 13'x13' Boat Lift PROPOSED Approx. 410 Sq. FT. Overwater Structure 300 Linear Ft of Shoreline Total Protrusion: 28' From MHW Line 211 Vessel Existing 25'x7' Dock MHW Line by Plat Approx.edge of mangrove Approx. MLW \ \� Bottom of Rip Kurth Consulting, LLC Marine Design and Permitting 4470 S&Aetw NW Teter, kl 450.3 99 p vles. Ff. 14119 Xom Email. , gmaiI5 aP FIRC 518" (NO ID #) �— PLATTED CONTROL LINE Property Boundry Kriger LOTS 28 & 29 205 BA. _,ONT DRIVE, BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA Top Of Rip Rap ;BENCHMARK SET PKNAIL EL. 5.13' ryV, Q� h ,e-ve4 PROF05n V0a DATE: CREATED: DE8.01MED sr: SCALE DES1ar4EDer: 1 "a3A^ A - i/L..[vV 0 L-W VM-L vamI aV0\ %I L,q.v ly PROPOSED with WATER DEPTHS i X-9.5 j X -0.3 X .6.9 X -4b X -0.4 X-6.2 X 7.2 X -9.6 X -9.9 I X-2A X-6.3 X -7.4 X 40.0 X -2.6 X45.6 X -7.6 X .7.0 X Ab � X1.7 X -ta X-6.9 X"7.3 X3 X -7b X .9.7 X-2.2 X'1.0 4.2 X -7.3 X-9.6 X�.3 X -7.e / Cross Section A 7X 6 4 -6.0 X-7.9 X.7.8 X -9.5 X -915 1.2 \ 1.7 X X .7.9 .8 X X.7.9 X4 -m X a., •1 X s.9 X.4., X .5.9 Ir. FIR 518" ,. X -3., X 45.9 X a.r X -6-2 FIRC 518" r� (NO ID #) X x•a (NO ID #) 1.7 X4.7 �c -2.2 X -&6 X_� � X -2.0 X•2A X .3.8 X2.2 X-2.0 I. Q X \ X2.0 �\\ 26 25X X 51 �^'V BENCHMAI PLATTED SET PKNA CONTROL LINE EL. - -- --- -- � � Furth Consulting, LLC Kriger wAr�r; � MM Marine Design and Permitting Telephone: 239.450.3599 4470 5t LOTS 28 & 29 Water Depths h- Aem ueNW DESpNWBY: � Email: 4kurffi,&mai, -coax Naples. Fl. 34119 I 205 BAYFRONT DRIVE ! f BONITA SPRINGS FLORIDA I + SCALE E3IDNED 8Y: CROSS SECTION A j Kurth Consulting, LLC Krlger I DA To `''.��ppe: i Marine Design and Permitting 239.450.3599 447051h_Avenue l4R' :9-450.3 99 Neptcs.Ft.3 NW j LOTS 28 8� 29 Cross Section i I 205 B/1 7NT DRIVE, BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA OREAMU: DESIGNED BY: scale DESIONEDBY: REVISION: 18A • Friday, November 12, 2010 • Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held ment Review prior to December 2, 2010, in order to be by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at considered at the public hearing. All materials used in 8.30 A.M., Thursday, December 2. 2010 in the Board presentation before the CCPC will become a permanent of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Ad- part of the record and will be available for presentation to ministration Building, Collier Government Center, 3301 the Rnard of Countv Commissioners, if applicable. East Tamiami Trail, Naples Florida, to consider: RESOLUTION OF THE,COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- PL2010 -1297 FOR A 26 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 -FOOT LIMIT IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOP- MENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 46 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE TWO BOAT LIFTS FOR THE BEN- EFIT OF LOTS 10 AND 11 IN THE REPLAT OF UNIT 3, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES SUBDIVISION IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner). All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Expert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes each. Persons who have been authorized to represent a group or organization should limit their presentation to ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. Written comments must be f Z ' and Land Develop- Any person who decides to appeal a aecision vi Me CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verba- tim record of the proceedings is made, which includes all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Planning Commission Collier County, Florida Mark P. Strain, Chairman filed with the Department o on November 12 2010 No.231188459 — AGENDA ITEM 9 -13 Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2010 SUBJECT: BD- PL2010 -1297, MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Mike McKee 16210 Old US 41 North Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Jeff Rogers Turrell, Hall & Associates 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 The petitioner is requesting a 26 -foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which will allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 46 feet into a waterway that is 420 feet wide. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject "boat dock lot' is located at 267 3rd Street West, further described as Lots 10 and 11, Block "G" in the replat of Unit 3, Little Hickory Shores Subdivision in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is to construct a dock facility on a boat dock lot located in Bonita Shores. The boat dock lots consist of two lots totaling .02 acres that are too small to accommodate a single family residence. Please note that the boat dock lots are allowed without a residential dwelling unit pursuant to PU- 87 -17C (Resolution 87 -260) which is included in the Staff Report back -up materials. The proposed 479 square -foot U- shaped BD- PL2010 -1297, Page l of 8 MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXT. November 8, 2010 I L£LY BAREP Bm t OOT LEE COUNTY PROJECT BONITA BEACH ROAD (c.R.ws LOCATION LELY —1. BAREFOOT 5 SHORES BEACH S dS AUDIIBOIJ " NORTH NAPLES CWNTRT REBEMCN k TECHNOLOGY CLUB - P_ LEE COUNTY LITTLE 1 1 D HICKORY \ za z3 AUDUBON NAPCLI MLUCE ARBOUP 21 zo 1B CON7 LAKE BAY \ BAY CtL,WB CLUB STERLING MEDITERRA BD 6 FOREST OANB 9 � 11 SECOND STREET 10 — HE LAKES \ WAIERGLADES REIREAL PLAZA O CI-EN EDEN ON THE BAY MEADOW BRWK \ ARBOR TRACE NLUGE PLACE ESTATES 1 _ ____ __ _ ETERANB MEMORIAL BOLLEVARD ATCHEE BAY CO— ATCHEE TARPON LAW MA BAY COK PLAZA IMPERIAL SANDAlW00D LAKES COLONILLA 18 US /N1GGIN5 74 C.R. BBB PASS ROAD 14 17 5 MIGCINS DAATSIMPERIAL 18 UNE NRE C WGGMS IMPERIN INDUS IES COCOHATCHEE BAY GERMAN NEST `p�TDUA�onvE BAY CDCgIATCHFE g' TAMIAMI PROTESSIONAL id a o RIPEN TRUST CE N IFR THIRD STREET � \BD BD _�., D ,654321 25" 24 RMF- FC`N VANDERBILT I Q No- 23Pg '*1 20 O 21 NLLAS WWER 22 _.Au.M NAPLEB BLVD. MEDICAL MEDICAL 1111 TRACT 21 PLAZA 21 COLDER CENTER TRACT ZZ SW PROF. BRB DEVEI.DFMENL 8 7 (DRI) HEALTX PARK VETERANS NE � WNES NAPLESI IA•_._� CO 1BID ROAD (C.R. BIB) C.R. B) MDNS NORTN- COVENTRY GRAN A CREEKBIDE Gjp_ ST. —N SDUARE SHDPP B COMMERCE PARK v Y CENTER LSE NLLAB TIE EVANCEUST ME CONVALESCENT RK S 29 CATHUC CHURCH APLES DAILY NENS C IXtT1510E x VANDERBILT 26 $ 27 7ER MEDIC. (S) 26 p BEACH NAPLES < F Q STDNEBRIDGE ESTATES PARN Z N O K 7 BD SIXTH STREET WEST PELICAN BSH D 7 BD 0 (DRI) 6 K PANuw MIRAUA LANE W [D all gPAVB.ION BD MERCAro PE!NSN[ 32 VANpERORT B EACH ROAD 39 MARBH O (DM) °¢ 35 - 2 V 33 BD WALGREENS 21 22 23 MARKER LAKE 25 26 27 VLLAS VENETIAN I B 9 PIAZA PELICAN BAY (DRI) IEMARIA FWNTAM HEAVENLY PARK 6 1 MON EREY 5 4 PD 3 2 EMERALD x RIDGE LAES m LOCATION MAP x I 1 HICKORY BAY C- �� /A7 WEST 1.2 1.1 2 2.2 A�4 R IIY/8 F BD L__.__.�—ew— ._. ..._—__....�_.__ 25 RM V I FIRST STREET BD I O PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -1297 ZONING MAP PUD I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 LITTLE HICKORY BAY LITTLE 1 1 D HICKORY \ za z3 zz 21 zo 1B BAY \ O BD 71' \ SECOND STREET \ O \ C 1 \ 1 2 3 4 5 74 RSF -4 22 21 20 18 16 �{ RSF O -4� 15 id 13 12 BD BD r. THIRD STREET 9 \BD BD _�., D ,654321 25" 24 RMF- PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -1297 ZONING MAP 7 V H D LITTLE HICKORY BAY I 1 D 71' BD 15 I 74 I 48D W 13 �{ RSF A -4� 15 id 13 12 i t 10 9 5 BD Q 12 8 7 6 1BID E 6 BD tt BD I 7 BD SIXTH STREET WEST 7 BD 0 BD BD BD BD E O I V 18 BD 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 I B 9 I g 8 7 6 1 BD D SD m cu PV® 10 BD r- U ® 6AREFOOT ARE I BEACH AUDUBON COUNTRY LUB I PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -1297 ZONING MAP dock will consist of a 6 -foot wide access walkway and two 4 -foot wide terminal platforms with two boatlifts. The facility will protrude a total of 46.0 feet into a waterway that is approximately 420 feet wide MHWL (Mean High Water Line) to MHWL. There is no dredging proposed for this project. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Two Vacant Lots, with a zoning designation of RSF -4 SURROUNDING: North: Little Hickory Bay, with a zoning designation of RSF -4 East: Boat Dock Lots, with a zoning designation of RSF -4 South: 3rd Street West, then Boat Dock Lots, with a zoning designation of RSF -4 West: Boat Dock Lots, with a zoning designation of RSF -4 Aerial photo taken from Collier County Property Appraiser website. BD- PL2010 -1297, Page 3 of 8 MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXT. November 8, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Services Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 5.03.06(E)(11) (Manatee Protection) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) is applicable to all multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) or more slips. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria. In order for the CCPC to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 and finds the following: Primary Criteria 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single - family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi - family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips on two boat dock lots (i.e. one dock per boat dock lot), which is less than the typical 2 -slips per boat dock lot. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MET). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. According to the petitioner's application, there are existing mangroves along the shoreline and the water depth at the site is not adequate to accommodate the 25 -foot and 30 -foot vessels without an extension. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 13D- PL2010 -1297, Page 4 of 8 MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXT. November 8, 2010 Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, there will be no impact on the navigable waterway because of its 220 -wide width. Neighboring existing docks protrude similar distances and therefore this dock will not protrude into or have any adverse impact on navigation within the waterway. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. According to the information provided by the petitioner, the waterway is 420 feet wide from MHW to MHW. The proposed facility will occupy about 21 percent or 46 feet of the 220 -foot navigable waterway width. Approximately 79 percent of the width will be maintained for navigability. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the proposed facility will not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The property is situated along a natural mangrove shoreline. The extension is necessary in order to minimize impacts to existing mangroves which protrude approximately 15 feet into the water. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. As shown on the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the deck area is not excessive and it allows safe access to the two vessels for loading /unloading and routine maintenance. 3. For single - family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject BD- PL2010-1297, Page 5 of 8 MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXT. November 8, 2010 property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not applicable as this is a boat dock lot. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility will not impact the view of the neighboring property owners. The lots in the area are all boat dock lots, and as such, there are no single family homes associated with the lots. In addition, the property and neighboring properties have a mangrove shoreline that provides a visual buffer between the top of the lot and the waterway. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, no seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility or within this portion of Little Hickory Bay. Therefore, there will he no impact to seagrass beds. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. Staff analysis indicates that the request meets all of the primary criteria and all of the secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the CCPC takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner. may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall he filed with the Growth Management Division Administrator within 30 days of the action by the CCPC. In the event that the petition has been approved by the CCPC, the applicant shall be advised that he /she proceeds with construction at his /her own risk during this 30 -day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BD- PL2010 -1297 revised on November 8. 2011. -HFAC BD- PL2010 -1297. Page 6 of 8 MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXT. November 8. 2010 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition BD- PL2010 -1297. Attachments: A. Picture from site visit BD- PL2010 -1297, Page 7 of 8 MCKEE BOAT DOCK EXT. November 8, 2010 PREPARED BY: NANCY T� CH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPART N F LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: red V RAYMO V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JAM D. LO Z JR., .E.. DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: � / K ( / i NICK CASALANGUIDA, DEPUTI A I STRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN BD- PL2010 -1297, Page S of S MCKEE BOAT DOCK ENT. November 4, 20 ]0 1nlyt2GG DA I(. E-- to DATE it . e9 .- z'0/& DATE DATE DATE View of proposed boat dock site. Mangroves are along shoreline, and existing docks are to the east and west. ATTACHMENT A CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 10- RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- PL2010- 1297 FOR A 26 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 -FOOT LIMIT IN SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 46 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE TWO BOAT LIFTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 10 AND 11 IN THE REPLAT OF UNIT 3, LITTLE HICKORY SHORES SUBDIVISION IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held a properly noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of a 26 -foot extension over the maximum 20 -foot limit provided in LDC Section 5.03.06 to allow for a 46 -foot boat dock facility in a residential single family (RSF -4) zoning district for property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 5.03.06; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Commission at a public hearing, and the Commission has considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition Number BD- PL2010 -1297, filed on behalf of Michael McKee by Jeff Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lots 10 and 11, Block G, Replat of Unit No. 3, Little Hickory Shores according to the map thereof in Plat Book 6, Page 2 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida Mike McKee / BD- PL2010 -1297 Page 1 of 2 09/23/10 be and the same is hereby approved for a 26 -foot extension of a boat dock over the maximum 20- foot limit to allow for a 46 -foot boat dock facility as shown on the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A ", in the zoning district wherein said property is located. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this ATTEST: day of 12010. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator Mark P. Strain, Chairman Growth Management /Planning & Regulation Division Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachment: Exhibit "A" — Proposed Site Plan CP \10- CPS - 01054 \3 Mike McKee / BD- PL2010 -1297 Page 2 of 2 09/23/10 g m X Cr a LITTLE HICKORY BAY McKEE DOCK 267 3RD ST W LOTS 10 811 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 Email; ADJACENT DOCKS Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. ZMarine & Environmental Consulting 584Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104 -3732 �iates.com Phone: (239) 643 -0166 Fax: (239) 643 -6632 BOAT TYP. 25' BOAT LIFT TYP. 11' WITH CANOPY BOAT q �9y TYP. 30' A� F `'1 (� s o ro 20 40 SCALT 9N7'Fi7 \ APPROX EDGE OF MANGROVES 7%2 APPROX BOTTOM i\ I OF BANK APPROX TOP OF BANK / MLWL -0.5' MHWL 0.0' 0 <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW. <> APPLICANT OWNS 48 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPROX 479 SQ FT. <> PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURE: APPROX 527 SQ FT. <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: 420' (MHW TO MHW) <> TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 46 FT. <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW = -0.5', MHW = 0.0'. <> SURVEY PROVIDED BY: "COURT GREGORY SURVEYING" —SURVEY DATED: 4/3012010 MI K E V O C r\ PROPr`'�D DOCK DESIGNED: T.T.T. REVISION: TAB NAME: I PROP LINE DRAWN BV: VJZ VJ2 -7 -1- 2010 -DEP SHEET: 5 CREATED: 532010 NIA SCALE: JOB 1018 N/A SECTION -5 TOWNSHIP -48S kNGE -25E qo 13A • Friday, November 12, 2010 • Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held be considered at the public hearing. All materials used in by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at presentation before the CCPC will become a permanent 8:30 A.M.. Thursday, December 2, 2010 in the Board part of the record and will be available for presentation to of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Ad- the Board of County Commissioners, if applicable. ministration Building, Collier Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples Florida, to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A GOLF DRIVING RANGE WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.03.01. A.1.c.17 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR 29.6 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6500 AIRPORT ROAD NORTH IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner, AICP) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. p�T.., XoEBB,ET B�,�X Bow item. Expert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining 5 w«�TEBEr �X tim record of the proceedings is made, which includes ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to w `? "XE.a„�os 5 spective public hearing. Written comments must be filed °s with the Zoning Section of Land Development Services Collier County, Florida =1 Mark Strain, Chairman No. 231188458 Xaiow �^^ °°' "' PROJECT H P �XEa VF1. LOCATION _ IOPo)IB B ate, RIDGE Boo Sg1.AF51EB 1�CWXE55 B a o� - TTEVESTA,ES BPoD(£ «agX `0 XEXS X� snxFqux E 14 es1E5wS HOYES � pppK T _ 51B , as (5'11 TES All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the item. Expert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining each. Persons who have been authorized to represent thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verba- a group or organization should limit their presentation to tim record of the proceedings is made, which includes ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must be based. submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the re- spective public hearing. Written comments must be filed Collier County Planning Commission with the Zoning Section of Land Development Services Collier County, Florida Dept. prior to Thursday, December 2, 2010, in order to Mark Strain, Chairman No. 231188458 November 12 2010 AGENDA ITEM 9 -C Co e-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION — PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2010 SUBJECT: CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Mr. John A. Pulling Jr., Trustee 5610 Yahl Street # 6 Naples, FL 34109 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: Karen Bishop PMS, Inc. of Naples 2335 Tamiami Trail North Suite 408 Naples, FL 34103 To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for a Conditional Use in the Agricultural (A) Zoning District for a Golf Driving Range pursuant to Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 2.03.01 A. Le. 17. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 29.6± acre property is located on the east side of Airport Road (CR -31) and north of Laguna Bay Condominium at Temple Citrus Grove, and further described as 6500 Airport Road North, in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on the following page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks a Conditional Use approval to allow for a Golf Driving Range on 14.9+ acres of an existing 29.61 acre Temple Citrus grove and market site. The Golf Driving Range is proposed to be located immediately to the east of the existing Temple Citrus retail building and will use a portion of the building (approximately 400 square feet) and a portion of the parking (19 parking spaces) for operations of the Golf Driving Range. The proposed driving range site is currently utilized as a citrus grove and portions of the site will continue to be utilized as a CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 1 of 11 Revised: 11 -8 -10 LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION # CU - PL - 2009 - 1497 GRAN CREEKMGE NAPLE94MAtO(ALEE 9H S CgAN l C[NfER IMNOKAIEE PEQNT �({ ttt£ OPAL 3 F Y ROAD (CA, 8M) CDNVAIFSCExT 5 ppAO PARK ORq, a66 L DALYWS P C RK Np11HBDE 1ER LIEDICAL(5) CENTER UMN6TO! DIES I�Jain�� 28 27 26 MAU. 29 �I STORM= 25 LAKE 9a9ENUC TE B09tr 97 PELICAN PELICAN OSESC T BREEZEWOOO MARSH (ORI) LAID: HANK. (3) ESTA GREENS ANLI STANDING OAKS LAKE NERCATO PELICAN 3 PAN! PELICAN -- MARSH 74 -{ Pyyi 3� n 32 3J JS KI) Z 3WILSWRE _NS MARKER LAKE V O pfLDAM LAKES CODFN WlE ESTATES UNIT NT VILLAS L b MARSH • • PLAZA a (oRl) VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD ""'• LEL1111R ^ —N IN VNEYARDS BScum VANTOREALT it BRIGHTDN (DPI) OWENS ^NEAAWHLY MONTEREY ATRUS GARDENS s Z I o PINE �I ELANE I NNEYAPDS () r LP < (lull R RIDGE � 2 m OAK (6) SROVE NN(DRI) sAV Rj 3 i PAY— I L. 1 5 m O SLEEPY / LOICVIEW FlRST 5 - HOLLOW TER BAPTIST RAM LONE OIURCM OAK PROJECT WILLOW PARK W LOCATION KEYSTONE p Pf PLACE GALE ESTATES N.N. UNITED ME P) PNE AIR MANCHESTER UNIT UNIT 35 7 NNEYAP09 9 GHUROI 10 11 LAKES (TIN) EN (81) COA ROTS AADGER NOR TILSUIYERWNOCGIEN� CCAMj A"' RADACNEORE %S�S (5) CC (C.R.8%) B RIDGE NAPUES GATEWAY GLESEN PINE RIDGE ROAD THE MIXED RIDGE USSEE DPORNSS PALLS WIRIEST NEADOWBR001( G5pM0 s WE AS. PLAZA EST. (S) j HOES WHRPOORWILL 16 16 I5 1 14 NAPLES B.T.C. 13 _SSE R LAKES 17 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES MOONNGS KENSINGTON RILING PRIES WILL UNIT 33 PORN UMBER OD PARK MACS LAKES S < WORLD EVANS TENNIS T WHIPPOORWILL CENTER BALMORAI I WOWS HAWKS MDGE I UVNSSTOi VILLAGE n 21 22 23 y 24 1 O 19 p e3 I BAKEY WLSOI LANE KOFF. �' WYNDEYERE GODEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 31 o CENTER S d GREY OAKS ] (DPQ 3i GREY OAKS NAPLES AT (DR) CLUING SANTA BAR SANTA BARBARA 28 27 26 (C.R.BBB) 25 J0 29 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES CODEN GALE ESTATES GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY GREY OAKS UNIT JD UNrt To (TIN) LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION # CU - PL - 2009 - 1497 .�. V�IIIIIIIIIIuunI11111111unummp -__ L E■ - I�Jain�� 1llllp ►,��1111111D��, ,! �I / `.ter • • ""'• it �I CPUD - - mi LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION # CU - PL - 2009 - 1497 N W Q E. S 0 a0 rro Too SG11£.• 1' + IQD' {II 1I J PROJECT ENTRANCE ill iii WILLOW PARK DRIVE 1 ll l ❑ 1` ' I �° - Li J 1, I QL Q tt t r~� (�� , ,e, OFFICE AREA o ��* Q .. M .. .. .. .. .. .. 'Y U - - -- - - -� -- = r. — - -_� -- I� I PIWPOSED i Q PARKING (10) aaDwE' A 1 ' PRO OSED RIVING RANGE I 200 I YD 1 V I D 250 YDS 4 I TEE #2 sm ov � 100 YDS 200 YDS S 1 DD YDS Q RAwr m A+w. ua R� NeRea7.a'w .. .. M&M .. .. .. �ro.*c roaw..• w.. � �.� LIMITS OF DRA 16' RANG 0 14.9Aci D, BLw l `p' I PARPONG suwium:• I II II I 1. IXIS IG MILMG: /f I rtcouam.' WAIL, aa's xr. a rffjjJJO0 - �T m.10[s cnc Aere• �m BUFFER DATA � w / I I IM �1 / � 1 OE506YPMW � m �O:ES �pE al/fFR REIIWR4fM5 FpP CAfNNL RAKE: !o N jl I PROW= 49 PM71gLD NR DvAm in SMC4S � i tL35 YAC6 Ibm l2W RNl.F (ITJ SIAC6 BLYICIIT• 0 AC OH AO O.H AO mom .1 OYbI£ 110. ro P.L RMF p l IET fIO FIST AO W. ro P.E Nabr O $b �� ?. PROPOSED ORMNC RANCE.• "�^ o.ES A^ zea Ac xxr Ac scum A0/0aoa• rm. ro Ac /ORO 1n l 1 I >9 rtES a vT - m sPAas OrTIrE xoo sr. a 1 w r sv ces rorv. r�.a0 Ac raTa Ae Tn.sa Ac l 200 PAp1pFD.' FAST PAIIXNC ARG (NEW): 10 SPACES 11FSf P.IIIOA4' ARG I[xlmw).' rT SPACES roTAL FW I 1 S h �•^Y I l \ LOT 5/ citrus grove after the proposed driving range is developed. (See the Conceptual Site Plan on the following page.) The site currently has one southbound left- in/right- in/right -out access at the existing access on Airport Road for the Temple Citrus Grove and Market. The Conceptual Site Plan, dated September 2010, depicts the limits of the 14.9± acre Golf Driving Range, the existing Temple Citrus Grove Shipping Store that will provide a 400 square foot office area, and the remaining citrus grove /agricultural area. It also shows the existing 19 and proposed 10 parking spaces that will be applied towards the required 21 parking spaces for the Golf Driving Range. There is no site lighting proposed for the Golf Driving Range. The Golf Driving Range will operate from sunrise to sunset. Portions of the existing citrus grove and agricultural uses that surround the driving range will contribute towards buffering. There are portions of the existing Type D Airport Road right -of -way landscape buffer in front of the Temple Citrus retail building that are currently missing. There are also portions of the northern buffer that will be missing when the exotics are removed. The replacement of the Type D Landscape Buffer along Airport Road and installation of a Type B buffer along the northern property line within the Conditional Use area (as described in the Legal Description) have been made conditions of approval of this Conditional Ilse. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: The site is currently developed, in the A (Agricultural) zoning district SURROUNDING: North: commercial office buildings in Willow Park PUD, and multi- family and single - family residential in Lone Oak PUD East: continuation of the 143± acre Temple Citrus Grove in the A (Agricultural) zoning district South: continuation of the 143± acre Temple Citrus Grove in the A (Agricultural) zoning district West: Airport Pulling Road, then developed businesses in the I (Industrial) zoning district CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 4 of 11 Revised: 11 -8 -10 Aerial GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated as Urban — Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Urban Designated area is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non - residential land uses. Relevant to this petition, the designation permits non - residential uses including parks, open space and recreational uses. The site is zoned Agricultural. Golf Driving Range is permissible as a conditional use in the Agricultural zoning district per Land Development Code (LDC) Section 2.03.01. The following policies of the FLUE are relevant to this conditional use application. Staff comments and analysis is shown in bold italic. CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 5 of 11 Revised: 11 -8 -10 Objective 7: "In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable." Policy 7.1 "The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code." As depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan, this project has one existing ingress /egress direct access onto Airport Pulling Road, an arterial road, which is the only vehicular access to the property and may be found consistent with this policy. Policy 7.2 "The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals." No internal roads are proposed as the nature of this project makes a loop road not feasible. This project may be found consistent with this policy. Policy 7.3 "All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection point with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type." The Conceptual Site Plan does not show access to the adjoining Willow Park PUD, Wellington at Lone Oak PUD, or Huntington Condominium, which directly abuts the subject property to the north. The subject property has no local streets, having just internal private driveways and parking. There are no local streets proposed as part of this project. Due to the nature of this project, the absence of local streets, and the nature of abutting property, this project may be found consistent with this policy. Policy 7.4 "The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types." As this is a non- residential use, this policy is not applicable and this project may be found consistent with this policy. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (T1S) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five year planning period. Therefore, the subject application is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Mitigation is not required. CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 6 of 11 Revised: 11 -8-10 Airport-Pulling Road Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 2.2, Airport- Pulling Road (CR- 31) between Orange Blossom Drive and Pine Ridge Road (CR -896). The project generates 14 net new p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 0.30 percent impact. This segment of Airport- Pulling Road (CR -31) currently has a remaining capacity of 1,789 trips, and is currently at LOS "C" (Level of Service "C ") as reflected by the 2009 AUIR (Annual Urban Inventory Report). No subsequent links beyond this segment of Airport- Pulling Road (CR -31) are significantly impacted by this project. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed conditional use may be deemed consistent with the applicable elements of the GMP. ANALYSIS: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property of uses in the same district of the neighborhood; and 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable: 1. Section 2.03.01 A.l.c.17., of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Agricultural (A) zoning district. The requested use for a Golf Driving Range is permitted as a conditional use in the Agricultural (A) zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, Conditional Uses Procedures, of the LDC. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and this project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC). 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As previously stated, the site will have one southbound left - in/right - in/right -out access at the existing access on Airport Road. The existing Temple Citrus Grove Shipping Store parking area will provide 19 of the required 21 parking spaces along the west side of the Golf Driving Range. Another 10 parking spaces are proposed in a separate parking area along the east side of the Golf Driving Range. CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 7 of 11 Revised: 11 -8-10 The Fire Code official's office has no objection to the ingress /egress, and will review the Site Development Plan (SDP) upon its submission to ensure compliance with applicable fire codes. 4. The affect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. If approved, the proposed Golf Driving Range will be located in an existing citrus grove that has been in existence for nearly 20 years. The proposed Golf Driving Range will also be set back 115± feet from the nearest property line to the north and 160± feet from the property to the south. Staff is of the opinion that along with the conditions of approval, the proposed use of a Golf Driving Range should have a minimal adverse impact on the adjacent properties in relation to noise, glare, or economic effects. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The proposed addition of a Golf Driving Range into a nearly 20 year old citrus grove should have minimal impact on adjacent properties. The Golf Driving Range is of similar intensity to the citrus grove that previously existed on the site. It does not measurably increase the level of impact on the adjacent properties and retains the same amount of open space. The Golf Driving Range will use 14.9± acres of an existing 29± acre citrus grove. The existing citrus grove will provide buffering to the south and the east. The Staff recommended Conditions of Approval for landscape buffering along the west and north property lines will make the proposed Golf Driving Range compatible with the surrounding residential and office land uses. Based on the above findings, Staff is recommending approval of this Conditional Use subject to the conditions of approval outlined at the end of this Staff Report. In addition, one letter of support and one letter of objection regarding this petition have been received from neighboring property owners and they are attached to the end of this Staff Report. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This site has been in a bonafrde agricultural use for decades and was cleared prior to 1975. This property meets the Environmental Impact Statement exemption criteria. Therefore, no EAC hearing was required. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM). Synopsis provided by Nancy Gundlach, Collier County Principal Planner: The meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on January 28, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at the Italian American Club, Naples, Florida. Twelve property owners attended, along with applicant's team of Karen Bishop of PMS, Inc., Pam Mac'Kie, Reed Jarvey and Jay Westendorf of Omega Consulting, along with county staff. CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 8 of 11 Revised: 11 -10 -10 Ms. Mac'Kie presented an overview of the project. She explained that the only change from the current 150 -acre orange grove use is that a portion of the existing orange grove is proposed to be a 15 -acre driving range. The driving range will be located along the western side of the property and towards the middle of the site (i.e. the north and south portions of the property are not part of the proposed driving range). There will be one tee at each end of the driving range (i.e. on the east and west side of the driving range). Parking will be located near each of the tees. In addition, nets will be provided along the north and south side of the driving range to keep errant golf balls from straying off of the property. The existing ingress and egress from Airport Road to the property will remain the same. The existing retail store will be used to sell buckets of balls for use on the driving range. The driving range will not be lighted. The neighboring property owners asked the following questions of Ms. Mac'Kie and Ms. Bishop (the petitioner's response is italicized): - How will this affect the traffic on Airport Road? Mr. Reed responded that Airport Road is currently below its service level and can accommodate the driving range traffic. - What are the hours of operation? The hours of operation are from sunrise to sunset. - Will the existing citrus store remain? Yes, the existing citrus store will remain. - Will the existing exotic vegetation buffer between the orange grove and the homes to the north be removed? No, the existing buffer will not be removed at this time, as it is not within the boundaries of the proposed Conditional Use. However, if and when the entire property is rezoned at a later date, the existing vegetation will be removed and replaced with the required landscape buffer. - Will there be a chain link fence? There is no prohibition for a chain link fence. When the property is rezoned at a later date, there will be a Type B Landscape Buffer. The agent reminded the questioner that there will be no changes to the northern portion of the property at this time. Ms. Mac'Kie stated that a net would be required by Collier County in order to receive approval. Ms. Bishop offered to create a perspective drawing to show the residents the view of the net. One of the neighbors, Mr. Jim Boughton stated that he supported the Conditional Use for a golf driving range. The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for CU- PL2009 -1497 revised on November 2, 2010. CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 9 of 11 Revised: 11 -10 -10 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition CU- PL2009 -1497 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, identified as "Pulling Driving Range Conceptual Site Plan" prepared by Omega Consulting Group, dated September 2010. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Land Development Services Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. Prohibited exotic vegetation must be removed from the subject site (as described in the legal description) at the time of development of the Golf Driving Range. 3. A Type B Landscape Buffer shall be installed along the northern property line. 4. The missing portions of the Type D right -of way landscape buffer along Airport Road shall be replaced at the time of development of the Golf Driving Range. CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 10 of 11 Revised: 11 -8 -10 PREPARED BY: NANCY G DLA H, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPART T OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: RAYMON.0 V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 9�s. . I AM D. LORE Jr. P.E. EL- WfI4 CTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: NICK CASALANGUIDA, DE 11' INISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Collier County Planning Commission: f�lo l DATE /0 - Z8 L /6 DATE DATE //- �'-/ o DATE MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN DATE Attachments: Attachment A: Letter of Support/ Letter of Objection Attachment B: Resolution Tentatively scheduled for the January 25, 2011, Board of County Commissioners Meeting CU- PL2009 -1497, PULLING DRIVING RANGE Page 11 of 11 Revised: 10 -28 -10 JBMB of Naples Inc Michele M Boughton 29 January 2010 Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP Principal Planner Department of Zoning and Land Development Review 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Gold Driving Range John A. Pulling, Jr. Trustee Dear Ms. Gundlach: 760 Clarendon Court Naples, Florida 34109 239.592.1787 I am writing to express my support for the development of property east of the Temple Citrus store on Airport- Pulling Road for the purpose of a golf driving range. I believe that this improvement will have minimal affect on Airport Road traffic and adjoining property owners. I also support the Owner's right to develop their own property in any reasonable manner that meets current zoning regulations without undue interference of government and special interest groups. Sincerely, — mmb Michele M Boughton as President for JBMB of Naples, Inc. MMB /jeb xc: file C. \Documents and Settings \n a ncyg a nd lach\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Fdes\Content. Outlook\OZ1 HAOB1\CCPlan 012910 Letter (2). doc Attachment A RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A GOLF DRIVING RANGE WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.03.01. A.Lc,17 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6500 AIRPORT ROAD NORTH IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004 -41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a golf driving range within an Agricultural (A) Zoning District pursuant to Subsection 2.03.01. A.l.c.17 of the Collier County Land Development Code on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and the specific requirements governing the Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that: Petition Number CU- PL2009 -1497 filed by Karen Bishop of PMS Inc., representing John A. Pulling, Jr., Trustee, with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A ", be and the same is hereby approved for a Conditional Use for a golf driving range within an Agricultural (A) Zoning District pursuant to Subsection 2.03.0l.A.l.c.17 of the Collier County Land Development Code, in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit "B" and Pulling Driving Range \CU- PL2009 -1497 Revised 4/23/10 1 of 2 Attachment B subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "C ". Exhibits `A ", `B" and "C" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super - majority vote, this day of 12010. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton -Cicko Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit C - Conditions 09- CPS - 00984/12 Puiling Driving RangelM- PL2009 -1 497 Revised 4/23/10 2 of 2 FRED W. COYLE, Chairman LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NORTH % OF THE NORTH h OF THE NORTH 36 OF THE NORTHWEST 'k LESS WEST 100' FOR R.O.W. SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING 19.768 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AND THE NORTH OF THE SOUTH % OF THE NORTH % OF THE NORTH % OF THE NORTHWEST '/a, SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF, CONTAINING 9.896 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT A N W Q 0 F. S o Do loo loo Sour..• I' - 100' u� 1I PROJECT ENTRANCE III WE,L,NG,�, , LANE DAK iii999 v, ('ONEO AUO — LUNE OAK) WILLOW P�AIRIK� DRIVE I I I LL(�K6 I I I u — ula ti O I �I OFFICE AREA o A --L- ; _� * Q _ .. , Mr / Ot — ASH — - -- -- .- — - - -� -- I AS A I I I I PA�RKINGE(10) �. _ ¢.�R PRO OSED RIVING RANGE 8 SAS. 0 RA X oEAjZ b : f o u No A. (� I I I °Y _ TEE 1 T #2 ._ nunlA I 250 YDS I Llll1.L• 100 I YDS 200 I YDS I 200 I YDS E 100 I YDS ' o N II.. .. .., a .. .. .. .. .. y�y} K'•�T,NC- TREE r / <.: ?U VEDIax• ( i I �6nx+p Apiton.n� vx� ^` 'i ZONELi: nl G) r LIMITS OF DRIVING RANG II- _�— y A, 14.9Act � LA GU IUM A 611 CONDO MIN (ZUNEO. RMF —a2) •�O BLI&'D�- I I PMKM Sf/AIAI�RY. I I 1 1. EXIS 0 8W MI;- SIZE dITA ® AUFFER d/TA wl MGIA%D: FFAC: 0.716 SR 0 I Jl SPARS anor . r•sbb SF i r �Aan• 44CAIPPRI oAmAV m ./uus .1OArµ SIA4Elt A[049flRNlS rtSP OAA9R Ie3'RIE) n I N MIAIA PROKOEO � D.• 4903 5 EUSANG IID SPwa T- N I 6L9pN0 0 AC 0.H AC 0.H AC IIJRM Af� /491£ I IW' R) IJ. NQN: O I Ip 'II 1A1S SPARS 1@p /p� IWIC[ (19) SAAR3 AID as Ae xev A JI c reo. 600+t•W PL aw Aq� Aalwom 2. PROPoSED MME. N Iror+E e I 1 = PEOIRR4: JD IRS 1 I/1 N SPACES DEST CRRUS / AO -A.= IAYn£ b O/iICG J66 SF. 1 1/Y66 I SMRS 200• i55! PAONCFD: FAST FARIIMC MFA 10 SPARS I 11ESf PARttP/C AREI (NSTACJ: ID SIAf6 �)FOY1�E3S ACS I 1 I 4h� •...— ...,+�..I ter. ��\ LOT 5 EXP'�IT B CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU- PL2009 -1497 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the site plan, identified as "Pulling Driving Range Conceptual Site Plan" dated September, 2010. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this Conditional Use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. Prohibited exotic vegetation must be removed from the subject site (as described in the legal description) at the time of development of the Golf Driving Range. 3. A Type B Landscape Buffer shall be installed along the northern property line. 4. The missing portions of the Type D right -of -way landscape buffer along Airport Road shall be replaced at the time of development of the Golf Driving Range EXHIBIT C (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE u — �- " I o Agenda Item # �-,,`` (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE fj� \U I' j 'Oc NAME C-)�—o f- L V, 4kRo ADDRESS Representing/ Petitioner: w I V(( C)U) K)�� Other: hil'�j I COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE j)� c- AGENDA ITEM TITLE �Y NAME J'-/0 Ky J f f"" a S -e Agenda Item # y- (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget ADDRESS C -2-S --F/-e �, e"-'1-< 3 y/0 Representing/ Petitioner: bvc /, -/e � k- S Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD 12A • Sunday, October 17, 2010 • Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 8:30 A.M.. Thursday, November 4 2010, in the Board of County Commis- sioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Col- lier Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples Florida, to consider: Petition: DOA- PL2010 -1751 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 05 -235 (DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 05 -01), AS AMENDED, FOR THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ( "DRI ") LOCATED IN SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST IN COLLIER COUN- TY, FLORIDA; BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMEND- MENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER BY REVISING EXHIBIT C: SRA MASTER PLAN TO DIVIDE TOWN CENTER 2 INTO TOWN CENTER 2a AND TOWN CENTER 2b, TO RELOCATE TOWN CENTER 2b TO OIL WELL ROAD AND TO RELOCATE AN ACCESS POINT ON OIL WELL ROAD; SECTION TWO, FIND- INGS OF FACT, SECTION THREE, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DE- VELOPMENT ORDERS, TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Indi- vidual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Ex- pert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes each. Persons who have been authorized to represent a group or organization should limit their presentation to ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Department of Zoning and Land Development Re- view prior to November 4, 2010, in order to be considered at the public hearing. All materials used in presentation before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commission- ers, if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and there- fore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the.proceed- ings is made, which includes all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Planning Commission Collier County, Florida Mark P. Strain, Chairman No.231188445 October 17 2010 AGENDA ITEM 9 -D CAT County ,mom REVISED STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES - -LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION -- PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2010 SUBJECT: DOA- PL2010 -1751, THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA DRI (COMPANION ITEM: SRAA- PL2010 -1988) PROPERTY OWNER &APPLICANT /AGENTS: Owner /Applicant Agents: David Genson, P.E. George Vamadoe, Esq. Alan D. Reynolds, AICP Ave Maria Development, LLLP Cheffy Passidomo WilsonNEller Stantec 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy. 821 Fifth Ave S., Suite 201 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Naples, FL 34102 Naples, FL 34105 REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Town of Ave Maria Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO) to revise Exhibit C so the DRI DO to divide Town Center 2 and relocate one access point. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The DRI subject property, consisting of 5,027 acres, is located on the north side of Oil Well Road, the west side of Camp Keais Road and approximately 6,000 feet south of Immokalee Road (CR- 846). The property lies within Sections 4 -9 & 16 -18, Township 48 South, Range 29 East and Sections 31 -33 Township 47 South, Range 29 East. (See the location map on following page) PURPOSEMESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is proposing to amend Exhibit C to DRI Development Order #05 -10, the Master Plan to divide Town Center 2 into Town Center 2a and 2b, moving Town Center 2b, approximately 50 acres in size, from Camp Keais Road to a site along Oil Well Road as depicted on the attached SRA Master Plan. In addition, the petitioner is relocating one access point along Oil Well Road. The westemmost access point is being moved to accommodate the Town Center 2b relocation. The petitioners are seeking this DRI (DRI) Development Order (DO) Amendment (DOA) in response to correspondence from the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Toxin of Ave Maria DRI, DOA- PL2010 -1751 Page 1 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev: 11/19/10 who has opined that since the SRA Master Plan is included as Exhibit C in the original DRI DO, the DRI DO must be amended to match the SRA Master Plan (See attached letter from DCA). In the DCA letter, the state has determined that the DRI DO can be amended without submitting an official Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC). Excerpt from original SRA Master Plan Town of Ave Maria DR[, DOA- PL2010 -1751 Page 2 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev: 11/19/10 ■ S N=1 G LMAL t 4 r ! NEiGi WAI { 1 �M■�.Hi G -tit t� Excerpt from Revised SRA Master Plan Excerpt from Revised SRA Master Plan Town of Ave Maria DRI, DOA- PL2010 -1751 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev: 11/19/10" b Area of change Area of change Page 3 of 7 development order. In accordance with the local government's procedures, including requirements for notice to the applicant and the public, the local government shall either deny the application for amendment or adopt an amendment to the development order which approves the application with or without conditions. This method of a DOA is different from the norm, where the applicant files a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) with the County and Regional Planning Council. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (RPC): Copies of the submittal documents were provided to the RPC for review. RPC staff has determined that no formal review by the RPC is required and a hearing before the RPC is not required (See attached August 5, 2010 letter from Daniel L. Trescott, RPC. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA): DCA provided a letter dated September 21, 2010, that indicated a DRI DO amendment would be required to make the changes proposed by the applicant. However, DCA determined that the DRI DO amendment would not require the filing of a formal Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC). Copies of the application submittal documents were provided to DCA for review. No comments have been received from that agency regarding the DRI DO amendment application itself: STAFF REVIEW Zoning Review: Development parameters contained in DRI Development Orders are prerequisite to zoning actions that implement DRI approved land use authorizations. DRI Development Orders are structured to contain regulations that respond to relationships dictated by State Administrative rules. Specifically, those relationships and questions that an applicant is required to analyze and report on as part of their Application for Development Approval (ADA) are included in the DRI DO. The proposed amendment does not change the overall approved uses, increase the overall approved density or overall use intensity, nor changes the perimeter boundaries of the SRA (or DRI), but it does change the location of permitted uses. The relocated Town Center 2b will intensify the uses in that area since that area is currently designated Neighborhood General. Neighborhood General is a residential area whereas the Town Center area allows for more intense commercial uses. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the Ave Maria Development Order Amendment and has determined that the proposed amendments do not present an additional impact on the adjacent roadway network. As such, the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 -year planning period, and staff recommends that this project be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). A letter from the applicants traffic engineer has been submitted in lieu of a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) included as back -up material. In the opinion of Staff, this letter addresses this project's existing traffic impacts and recognizes that there are minimal changes to the distribution characteristics of the DRI; though nothing is indicated that would impact the project's consistency with GMP Transportation Element Policy 5.1. Town of Ave Maria DRI, DOA- P12010 -1751 Page 5 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC bit Rev: 11/19110 Those policies require the review of all rezone requests with consideration of their impact on the overall transportation system, and specifically note that the County should not approve any request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) within the five -year planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. Mitigation requirements have been previously addressed and satisfied in prior approvals. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition revised on November 10, 2010. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition DOA -PL- 2010 -1751 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval as described by the amending DRI Development Order resolution. Town of Ave Maria DRI, DOA- PL2010 -1751 Page 6 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev: 11/19/10 KA SELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER bATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: // - /o. I A RAYMO EL OWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE DEPAR MENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �kz' � 1 1( Io Lcio LIAM D. LO NZ, J , P.E., DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: NICK CASALAN UID , D T ADMINISTRATOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN DATE Tentatively scheduled for the December 14, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Town of Ave Maria DRI, DOA- PL2010 -1751 Page 7 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev: 11/9/10 CAMP KEAIS ROAD u TOWN CENTER 7a NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL Q COMMUNTY PARK WRA �r COMMUNITY PARK l � ° UNNERSTTY DISTRICT o P UNNERSITY Ik �nIC DISTRICT u ED Q� �� C GORE �.. FE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL � TOWN CEMER3 J SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY - -.. PARK NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL I 0� WRA } UNIVERSITY DISTRICT 0 NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL Land Use Summary ----- --- -- -- ------ 300' FSA Buffer University District 956 Acres I -- Town Core 24 Acres Town Centers 265 Acres Neighborhood General 3495 Acres ® Services District 39 Acres Community Parks 74 Acres Other 174 Acres Total 5027 Acres NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL GOLF COURSE WRA I NEIGHBOBHOODGENERAL I C GOLF COURSE WRA r ` � v TOWN CENTER 1b GOLF COURSE\ � {�NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL GOLF COURSE Q J J W • HSA - \ Figure FSA l 0 875' 1750' 3500' NORTH SCALE HSA ; ' HSA �� _ '_' HSA SRA Master Plan FSA �f (Revised November 29, 2010) -- Town Plan The Town of Ave Maria Page 6 (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE l ZIz Agenda Item # (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA IITTE�M TITLE � NAME !7 ��S ��On i ADDRESS'// l 13 X/i !d 13,-) Representing/ Petitioner: Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR n1 nr C rnMDt CTDn CnDM n1U TuC TART C 1 CCT nF T41F nTAC TN T41F RnAPn RnnM DRTnR Tn THE CI IRiprT RFTNr. HFARr) (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # MEETING DATE 2Z),f0 (Circle Meeting Type) egular, , Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE /9.v,57 19,IXIA /2g ey'fAJ 1- i Mpf3e-T NAME /� I Z /3 Cdr Tl�- %�_ I�i4lrlc'a �r� ADDRESS 44/�1-:4 ST�ir✓,C3�c� 1�i4 Y, l�l�� i421f� . TL Representing/ Petitioner: /lCsinCNT :yysy5t� Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # q� MEETING DATE (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TIT�LEj NAME f/� /V Q� ,%_c cs Representing/ Petitioner: ADDRESS Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE t -Z- AGENDA ITEM TITLE N A M E O j ef,A A C L- L� A -kAOIJD I LL + Representing/ Petitioner: A u E)jj?_ r Agenda Item # (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget ADDRESS��-"I 0 `� Other: v1�-- "fl)e r 1- COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item ##%b iD MEETING DATE /� (Circle Meeting Type) (Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE Gt! /� d�Il o� r rpm /� NAME ADDRESS % 9 7'7j q7' Representing/ Petitioner: _65 Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE C} --?- 10e C. Z® 1 C> AGENDA ITEM TITLE '4v NAME Agenda Item # M G �- y�. (Circle Meeting Type Regular Special Workshop Budget ADDRESS 15--1 Representing/ Petitioner: __9: '�3"lkc Z- Other: NJL �-U.f 1 A. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THR E (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item #`Y MEETING DATE / �,? i 2 — / &1 (Circle Meeting Type) Re ula Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE NAME R I ('� /4,�j (R )) DON jV IF ADDRESS MT U C Representing/ Petitioner: 6 `i/ /v r g Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # + MEETING DATE f . �r, �j , I C; (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE A ve- D" la v) rti NAME M N N' H 0 rV I rc� �� _ ( A ADDRESS �} 1� L "— N C; 'T O N S i v y M A P ► � � - 3w � �— Representing/ Petitioner: (ejys i�c / 146 me Oo. 11e'`'- Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # q-D okwf v,EETING DATE �� &OIL) (Circle Meeting Type) AGENDA ITEM TITLE NAME ADDRESS /6 Representing/ Petitioner: 1 w " E Other: Regular Special Workshop Budget L �g C.f ` 9(l r d �.s c COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPI FTFn FnDM nKI -rue -rAnl � I --... __. _.._ __ _ __ _ _ _ . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # MEETING DATE (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE NAME ADDRESS i Representing/ Petitioner: Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) r METING DATE De& c m 64 r , )Ole) AGENDA ITEM TITLE ?C+ t d n Doi U/a / �s Agenda Item # (Circle Meeting Type) Regulap Special Workshop 11A get on SPi� A- P"0/G - i 9�4r- NAME �A f �Te it 5e v� ADDRESS S Representing /Petitioner: �p5 -'r% �� Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR ni AI^C t-nMDI F:TFn FnRM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE /Z `' Z`° e' AGENDA ITEM TITL Agenda Item # (Circle Meet' Type) NAME '1 z T 5 ADDRESS S A Representing/ Petitioner: "d �,�,� /d lA Regular.' Special Workshop Budget �cr S;R0 LZo IO - 1484 Other: rI COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT MEETING DATE 2 CLEARLY) Agenda Item # —%6&IF 1-0/0 AGENDA ITEM TITLE D /� ��%� Jfl Kip �J NAME J- 6(, L) IqA 0 M A Representing/ Petitioner: (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget Z- 4-4 C ADDRESS 5—?16 Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # % y� MEETING DATE "' �/ �, (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget �� g AGENDA ITEM TITLE 41 NAME Representing ADDRESS y7', Other: '0(x Y- COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE I � — '�N /0 Agenda Item # 4vc VA4'o- (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Bu get AGENDA ITEM TITLE A 4 ' 6461dqz hg4' -1ah r NAME ` C ADDRESS 1-00 SrC11V0CQC �/� '�1 tL Representing/ Petitioner: Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # C% �I, ` MEETING DATE (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE �''y � 'vim /'y? '� NAME71:�>O-"j Representing /Petitioner: ADDRESS Sr ,qs �' � / S -' ' ``- ' i � S' 6. Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD 4DI41F tPulte November 30, 2010 Mr. Nick Casalanguida, Administrator Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: The Town of Ave Maria Development Order and SRA Amendment Dear Mr. Casalanguida: We understand that Ave Maria Development, LLLP, the developer of the Town of Ave Maria, has filed applications to amend the Town of Ave Maria DRI and SRA to reposition approximately 50 acres from the Town Center located on Camp Keais Road to a Town Center on Oil Well Road, and to relocate the western -most access point further east near the relocated Town Center 2b. Pulte Home Corporation owns the property north of Anthem Parkway and north of the proposed relocated 150 acre Town Center. As the adjacent property owner, Pulte Homes Corporation supports the application and consequently, has no objection to the repositioning of approximately 50 acres of Town Center from Camp Keais Road to Oil Well Road nor to the relocation of the access point along Oil Well Road. Sincerely, Pulte Home Corporation r,q C6.� Richard McCormick Vice President, Land South Florida Division cc: David Genson, PE Alan Reynolds, ACIP 9240 Estero Park Commons Blvd., Suite 1 Estero, Florida 33928 239.495.4800 239.495.4898 (Fax) pultegroupinc.com 1075.2010. 220524- Vec1- MPERRY 07213 - 000.003 • PPHS - 33360 7 f 4014F November 30, 2010 Mr. Nick Casalanguida, Administrator Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: The Town of Ave Maria Development Order and SRA Amendment Dear Mr. Casalanguida: We understand that Ave Maria Development, LLLP, the developer of -the Town of Ave Maria, has filed applications to amend the Town of Ave Maria DRI and SRA to reposition approximately 50 acres from the Town Center located on Camp Keais Road to a' Town Center on Oil Well Road, and to relocate the western -most access point further east near the relocated Town Center 2b. Del Webb Naples Community Association, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Del Webb Golf Course and the representative of the residents of the Del Webb Naples community. As an adjacent property owner, Del Webb Naples Community Association has no objection to the repositioning of approximately 50 acres of Town Center from Camp Keais Road to Oil Well Road nor to the relocation of the access point along Oil Well Road. Sincerely, Del Webb Naples Community Association, Inc. Scott Brooks President cc: David Genson, PE Alan Reynolds, ACIP 9240 Estero Park Commons Blvd. Estero, FL 33928 Phone: 239.495.4800 Fax: 239.495.4898 10/Yl010- 220521- Ver. I - fAPERRV 07213000-M -PM-n M Municode Page oe 50 Update the RLSA Overlay Map and Official Zoning Atlas. The Official Zoning Atlas aE0 updat ed to reflect the designation of the SSA. Sufficient information shall be included o the updated zoning maps so as to direct interested parties to the appropriate public records associated with the designation, including but not limited to Resolution number and SSA Designation Application number. The RLSA Overlay Map shall be updated to reflect the SSA designation during a regular growth management cycle no later that twelve months from the effective date of the SSA Agreement. F. SSA Amendments. Collier County shall consider an amendment to an approved SSA in the same manner described in this Section for the designation of an SSA. Amendment(s) to approved SSAs shall only be considered if the application removes one or more additional Land Use Layers from the existing SSA. Under no circumstances shall Land Use Layers, once removed as part of an SSA designation, be added back to the SSA. The application to amend the SSA may be submitted as part of an application to designate a new SSA provided such lands are contiguous to the previously approved SSA and are under the same ownership. (Ord. No. 05 -27, § 32) 4.08.07 - SRA Designation SRA designation is intended to encourage and facilitate uses that enable economic prosperity and diversification of the economic base of the RLSA District, and encourage development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques and facilitates a compact form of development to accommodate population growth by the establishment of SRAs. Stewardship Credits generated from SSAs are exchanged for additional residential or non - residential entitlements in an SRA on a per acre basis as set forth herein. Density and intensity within the RLSA District shall not be increased beyond the Baseline Standards except through the provisions of the Stewardship Credit System, the affordable housing density Bonus as referenced in the density Rating System of the FLUE, and the density and intensity blending provision of the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The procedures for the establishment and transfer of Credits and SRA designation are set forth herein. Credits can be transferred only to lands within the RLSA District that meet the defined suitability criteria and standards set forth herein. Land becomes designated as an SRA on the date that the SRA Credit Agreement becomes effective pursuant to Section 4.08.07 D.11. Any change in the residential density or non residential intensity of land use on a parcel of land located within an SRA shall be specified in the resolution, which shall reflect the total number of transferable Credits assigned to the parcel of land. A. Lands Within the RLSA District that can be Designated as SRAs. All privately owned lands within the RLSA District that meet the suitability criteria contained herein may be designated as SRA, except lands delineated on the RLSA Overlay Map as FSA, HSA, or WRA, or lands already designated as an SSA. WRAs may be located within the boundaries of an SRA and may be incorporated into an SRA Master Plan to provide water management functions for properties within such SRA, subject to all necessary permitting requirements. 1. Suitability Criteria. The following suitability criteria are established to ensure consistency with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the RLSA Overlay. a. An SRA must contain sufficient suitable land to accommodate the planned development. b. Residential, commercial, manufacturing /light industrial, group housing, and transient housing, institutional, civic and community service uses within an SRA shall not be sited on lands that receive a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2. C. Conditional use essential services and governmental essential services, with the exception of those necessary to serve permitted uses and for public safety, shall not be sited on land that receives a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2, regardless of the size of the land or parcel. d. Lands or parcels that are greater than one acre and have an Index Value greater than 1.2 shall be retained as open space and maintained in a predominantly natural vegetated state. e. Open space shall also comprise a minimum of thirty -five percent of the gross acreage of an individual SRA Town, Village, or those CRDs exceeding 100 acres. Gross acreage includes only that area of development within the SRA that requires the consumption of Stewardship Credits. f. As an incentive to encourage open space, open space on lands within an SRA located outside of the ACSC that exceeds the required thirty -five percent retained open space shall not be required to consume Stewardship Credits. g. An SRA may be contiguous to an FSA or HSA, but shall not encroach into such areas, and shall buffer such areas as described in Section 4.08.07 J.6. An SRA may be contiguous to, or encompass a WRA. h. http:// library. municode .com /print.aspx ?clientID =13 992& HTMRequest= http %3a %2f%2fl... 11/19/2010 Municode Page 22 of 50 The SRA must have either direct access to a County collector or arterial road or indirect access via a road provided by the developer that has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development in accordance with accepted transportation planning standards. 2. SRAs Within the ACSC. SRAs are permitted within the ACSC subject to limitations on the number, size, location, and form of SRA described herein. Nothing within this Section shall be construed as an exemption of an SRA from any and all limitations and regulations applicable to lands within the ACSC. Lands within the ACSC that meet all SRA suitability criteria shall also be restricted such that credits used to entitle an SRA in the ACSC must be generated exclusively from SSAs within the ACSC. No early entry bonus credits can be used to entitle an SRA within the ACSC. a. The only forms of SRA allowed in the ACSC east of the Okaloacoochee Slough shall be Hamlets and CRDs of 100 acres or less and the only forms of SRA allowed in the ACSC west of the Okaloacoochee Slough shall be Villages and CRDs of not more than 300 acres and Hamlets. Provided, however, two SRAs, consisting of any combination of Villages or CRDs of not more than 500 acres each, exclusive of any lakes created prior to the effective date of this amendment as a result of mining operations, shall be allowed in areas that have a frontage on State Road 29 and that, as of the effective date of the RLSA Overlay, had been predominantly cleared as a result of Ag Group I (Layer 5) or Earth Mining or Processing Uses (Layer 3). b. The Town form of an SRA shall not be located within the ACSC. B. Establishment and Transfer of Stewardship Credits. The procedures for the establishment and transfer of Credits and SRA designation are set forth herein. Stewardship Credits will be exchanged for additional residential or non - residential entitlements in an SRA on a per acre basis, as described in Section 4.08.07 B.2. Stewardship density and intensity will thereafter differ from the Baseline Standards. 1. Transfer of Credits. The transfer or use of Stewardship Credits shall only be in a manner as provided for herein. a. Stewardship Credits generated from any SSA may be transferred to entitle any SRA, except where the SRA is within the ACSC, in which case only Stewardship Credits that have been generated from an SSA within the ACSC can be used to entitle such SRA. No early entry bonus credits can be used to entitle an SRA within the ACSC. b. Credits can be transferred only to lands within the RLSA that meet the defined suitability criteria and standards set forth herein. C. Stewardship Credits may be transferred between different parcels or within a single parcel, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of these policies. Residential clustering shall only occur within the RLSA District through the use of the Stewardship Credit System, and other forms of residential clustering shall not be permitted. d. Stewardship Credits may be acquired from any credit holder and transferred to an SRA subject to the limitations contained in this Section. e. Stewardship Credits may be acquired from a Stewardship Credit Trust established pursuant to Section 4.08.04 B., and transferred to an SRA subject to the limitations contained in this Section. 2. Stewardship Credit Exchange. Stewardship Credits shall be exchanged for additional residential or non - residential entitlements in an SRA on a per acre basis at a rate of eight (8) Stewardship Credits per gross acre. Lands within an SRA greater than one acre, with Index Values of greater than 1.2, shall be retained as open space and maintained in a predominantly natural, vegetated state. Any such lands within an SRA located outside of the ACSC exceeding the required thirty - five (35) percent shall not be required to consume Stewardship Credits. 3. Public Benefit Uses. The acreage within an SRA devoted to a public benefit use shall not be required to consume Stewardship Credits and shall not count toward the maximum acreage limits of an SRA. For the purpose of this Section, public benefit uses are limited to public schools (preK- 12) and public or private post secondary institutions, Post Secondary Institution Ancillary Uses, community parks exceeding the minimum requirement of 200 square feet per dwelling unit, municipal golf courses, regional parks, and governmental facilities excluding essential services as defined in the LDC. 4. Mixed Land Use Entitlements. In order to promote compact, mixed use development and provide the necessary support facilities and services to residents of rural areas, the SRA designation and the transfer of the Stewardship Credits allows for a full range of uses, accessory uses and associated uses that provide a mix of services to and are supportive to the residential population of an SRA and the RLSA District. SRAs are intended to be mixed use and shall be allowed the full range of uses permitted by the Urban Designation of the FLUE, as modified by Policies 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.7.3, 4.7.4 and RLSA Overlay Attachment C. Depending on the size, scale, and character of an SRA, it shall be designed to include an appropriate mix of retail, office, recreational, civic, governmental, and institutional uses, in addition to residential uses. http:// library. municode. com / print. aspx? clientID = 13992 &HTMRequest= http %3a %2f%2fl... 11/19/2010 Municode o �ry e Page 26 of 50 E. The SRA master plan depicting the land uses and identifying the number of residential dwelling units, gross leaseable area of retail and office square footage and other land uses depicted on the master plan; (4) A description of the SSA credits that are needed to entitle the SRA land and the anticipated source of said credits; (5) The applicant's acknowledgement that development of SRA land may not commence until the applicant has recorded an SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum with the Collier County Clerk of Courts; and (6) The applicant's commitments, if any, regarding conservation, or any other restriction on development on any lands, including wetlands, within the SRA, as may be depicted on the SRA Master Plan for special treatment. C. The SRA Credit Agreement shall be effective on the latest of the following dates: (1) The date that the County approves the SRA Application; (2) The date that documentation of the applicant's acquisition of the Stewardship Credits to be utilized for the SRA is found by the County to be sufficient; or (3) Five (5) working days after the date on which the applicant submits documentation of the acquisition of the Stewardship Credits to be utilized, if the County fails to make a sufficiency determination prior to that date. d. Following approval of the SRA Application, the applicant shall record a SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum, which shall include the following: (1) A cross reference to the recorded SSA Credit Agreement Memorandum or Memoranda for the SSA lands from which the credits being utilized are generated and identification of the number of credits derived from each SSA; and (2) a legal description of the SRA lands. e. If the development provided for within an SRA constitutes, or will constitute, a development of regional impact ( "DRI ") pursuant to § 380.06 and 380.0651, F.S., and if the applicant has obtained a preliminary development agreement ( "PDA ") from the Florida Department of Community Affairs for a portion of the SRA land, the applicant may request the County to enter into a Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement for those Stewardship Credits needed in order to develop the PDA authorized development. Commencement of the PDA authorized development may not proceed until the applicant has recorded a Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum. The Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement and Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement shall include the same information and documentation as is required for an SRA Credit Agreement and an SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum. SRA Application Review Process. 1. Pre - Application Conference with County Staff. Prior to the submission of a formal application for SRA designation, the applicant shall attend a pre - application conference with the County Manager or his designee and other county staff, agencies, and officials involved in the review and processing of such applications and related materials. If an SRA designation application will be filed concurrent with an SSA application, only one pre - application conference shall be required. This pre - application conference should address, but not be limited to, such matters as: a. Conformity of the proposed SRA with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP; b. Consideration of suitability criteria described in Section 4.08.07 A.1. and other standards of this Section; C. SRA master plan compliance with all applicable policies of the RLSA District Regulations, and demonstration that incompatible land uses are directed away from FSAs, HSAs, WRAs, and Conservation Lands; d. Assurance that applicant has acquired or will acquire sufficient Stewardship Credits to implement the SRA uses, and; e. Consideration of impacts, including environmental and public infrastructure impacts. 2. Application Package Submittal and Processing Fees. The required number of SRA Applications and the associated processing fee shall be submitted to the County Manager or his designee. The contents of said application package shall be in accordance with Section 4.08.07 D. 3. Application Deemed Sufficient for Review. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the SRA Application, the County manager or his designee shall notify the applicant in writing that the application is deemed sufficient for agency review or advise what additional information is needed to find the application sufficient. If required, the applicant shall submit additional information. Within twenty (20) days of receipt of the additional information, the County Manager or his designee shall notify the applicant in writing that the application is deemed sufficient, or, what additional or revised information is required. If necessary, the County Manager shall again inform the applicant in writing of information needed, and the timeframe outlined herein shall occur until the application is found sufficient for review. 4. httD: / /Iibrarv.municode. com/t )rint. asDx ?clientID =13 992 &HTMRe a uest= httD %3 a %2f%2fl... 11/19/2010 QE 20A • Friday, November 12, 2010 • Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the be filed with the Department of Zoning and Land Development Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 8:30 A.M., Review prior to December 2, 2010, in order to be considered at Thursday, December 2, 2010, in the Board of County Com- the public hearing. All materials used in presentation before the missioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be Collier Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples available for presentation to the Board of County Commission - Florida, to consider: ers, if applicable. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBERS 2004- 89 AND 2005 -234A FOR THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA STEW- ARDSHIP RECEIVING AREA TO REVISE THE SRA MASTER PLAN TO DIVIDE TOWN CENTER 2 INTO TOWN CENTER 2A AND TOWN CENTER 26; TO RELOCATE TOWN CENTER 2B TO OIL WELL ROAD AND TO RELOCATE AN ACCESS POINT ON OIL WELL ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF OIL WELL ROAD AND WEST OF CAMP KEAIS ROAD IN SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem, AICP Principal Planner) PROJECT C.R. 846 LOCATION u n 6 -l5 S.R. 64 Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Indi- need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and there - vidual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Ex- fore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceed - pert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes each. Persons ings is made, which includes all testimony and evidence upon who have been authorized to represent a group or organization which the appeal is to be based. should limit their presentation to ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agen- Collier County Planning Commission da packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days Collier County, Florida prior to the respective public hearing. Written comments must Mark P. Strain, Chairman No. 231188460 November 12. 2010 AGENDA ITEM 9 -E n Co e_r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES - -LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION -- PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2010 SUBJECT: SRAA- PL2010 -1988, THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA STEWARDSHIP RECEIVING AREA (SRA) [COMPANION TO PETITION NUMBER DOA - PL2010 -17511 PROPERTY OWNER &APPLICANT /AGENTS: Owner /Applicant Agents: David Genson, P.E. George Varnadoe, Esq. Alan D. Reynolds, AICP Ave Maria Development, LLLP Cheffy Passidomo WilsonMiller Stantec 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy. 821 Fifth Ave S., Suite 201 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Naples, FL 34102 Naples, FL 34105 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Town of Ave Maria SRA to revise the Master Plan to divide the Town Center 2 tract into Town Center 2a and 2b, and to relocate the roadway connections on Oil Well Road. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 5,027 acres, is located on the north side of Oil Well Road, the west side of Camp Keais Road and approximately 6,000 feet south of Ixmnokalee Road (CR -846). The property lies within Sections 4 -9 & 16 -18, Township 48 South, Range 29 East and Sections 31 -33 Township 47 South, Range 29 Easy. (See the location map on following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition is amending the SRA resolution (Resolutions No. 2004 -89 and 2005-234A) pursuant to Section 4.08.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code. That amendment requests approval of a Master Plan amendment to divide Town Center 2 into Town Center 2a and 2b, moving Town Center 2b, approximately 50 acres in size, from Camp Keais Road to a site along Oil Well Road as depicted on the attached SRA Master Plan. In addition, the petitioner is relocating access points along Oil Well Road. The westernmost access point is being moved to accommodate the Town Center 2b relocation. Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 Page 1 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev 3:11/19110 HENDRY COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY C.R. 846 l LEE COUNTY PROJECT COLLIER COUNTY LOCATION N C.R. 858 I N m d Ci 1 -75 S.R. 84 CITY OF NAPLES N v�f rn Gy, v R/ IN 01 1, CI t0 EVERGLADES � aq � /cm U U D vQo�Tb °�o 4 cy COLLIER COUNTY MONROE COUNTY A- MHO- RLSAO- CLH AND CDC- AMHO- SBA -15 MAO A#140 -RLSA0. BCI /RCP -SBA -2 RL- BAID i Q A- SC A-MNO• RLSAO A- MHO-RLSAO- BOBCP -SSA.S A-MN0. RLSAO RLBAOO RLSAO I RLSAO A -MHO- RLBAO A4M- A -MHO- RLSAO RLBAO SITE LOCATION 1a 1a 21 22 ►.MHO- A -MHO. RLSAO RLSAO LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION #SRAA -PL- 2010 -1988 5 R E C A M P K E A I S R O A D O WRA Land Use Summary -- °— ° °• ° °° 300' FSA Buffer University District 956Acres Town Core 24 Acres 0 Town Centers 265Acres 0 Neighborhood General 3495Acres ® Services District 39 Acres .::.v.:-.... Community Parks 74 Acres Other 174 Acres Total 5027Acres . �� r ■i fs` �! ��,I `` iNW ifffift. Uil IMMI sp e�� s a I► � a '�� ---- � -�� -- ` 00 NORTH SGAIE 1 r This petition is a companion petition to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO) amendment to make the same changes to the DRI DO. The DRI petition is identified as PROPOSED TOWN CENTER 2 CHANGES Camp Keais Road -- - �- rp�n+[EkrE62 MW" ee;wn2 1 NE GENHt�6 -- M I�IGHBLRHC47r_.EHEW.1 M;IG+iFORtt3CAC€FiEMI Excerpt from original SRA Master Plan showing Town Center 2 Area of change W s • Area of change • • 0 Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 Page 2 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev 3: 11/19/10 C Excerpt from original SRA Master Plan showing original designation of area along Oil Well Road ■ I s N93MBORHOODGENERAL !!k lFJWDG75NE AL Tr Excerpt from proposed SRA Master Plan Area of change showing the re- designation of Town Center 2a Area of change For Town Center 2 Excerpt from proposed SRA Master Plan showing the relocation area for Town Center 2b Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 Page 3 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev 3: 11/19/10 PROPOSED ACCESS POINT DIFFERENCES - -..•� Approved access point ! 0 J W Approved access point to remain d Er J J W 7 Proposed access point relocation J i Excerpt from original SRA Master Plan Excerpt from proposed SRA Master Plan GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated on the Future Land Use Map and Map Series as Agriculture/Rural, Agriculture/Rural Mixed Use District and is within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA). The Town of Ave Maria is an approved and partially developed Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) and Development of Regional Impact (DRI), both of which were deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element at time of approval in 2005. This petition seeps to amend the SRA Master Plan (through a public hearing process) to divide the Town Center 2 Tract into two parts, Town Center 2a and 2b, and relocate Town Center 2b from along Camp Keais Road to along Oil Well Road (CR 858). The SRA document and Master Plan is incorporated by reference into the DRI Development Order. A companion petition (DOA- PL2010 -1751) is seeking the same amendment. Based upon the above analysis, staff finds that the proposed amendment to the Town of Ave Maria SRA may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 Page 4 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev 3: 11/19/10 STAFF REVIEW: Zoning Review: The proposed amendment changes comply with the requirements of the SRA procedures set forth in LDC Section 4.08.07. In compliance with LDC Section 4.08.07.E, the proposed changes are not in conflict with any SRA suitability criteria, RLSA District regulations. The proposed changes continue to direct incompatible land uses away from FSAs, HSAs, WRAs, and Conservation Lands. The petitioner has already demonstrated that he has acquired or will acquire sufficient Stewardship Credits to implement the SRA uses. The proposed changes should not have negative including environmental and public infrastructure impacts. The proposed amendment does not change the overall approved uses, increase the overall approved density or overall use intensity, nor changes the perimeter boundaries of the SRA (or DRI), but it does change the location of permitted uses. The relocated Town Center 2b will intensify the uses in that area since that area is currently designated Neighborhood General. Neighborhood General is a residential area whereas the Town Center area allows for more intense commercial uses. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the Ave Maria SRA Amendment and has determined that the proposed amendments do not present an additional impact on the adjacent roadway network. Transportation Planning Staff provided the following comments: [Transportation Planning staff] has no objection to [the] relocation of 465, 000 square feet of approved commercial [area] within the site. The traffic analysis looks at a 2012 buildout of this square footage, and includes a 5-year analysis. [There is] no change to net external [approved] trip generation. As such, the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5- year planning period, and staff recommends that this project be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). A letter from the applicant's traffic engineer was submitted with the companion DRI DO amendment application in lieu of a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS). Since the issues are identical, staff did not require additional information to be submitted for this SRA amendment. In the opinion of Staff, that letter addresses this project's existing traffic impacts and recognizes that there are minimal changes to the distribution characteristics of the overall project; though nothing is indicated that would impact the project's consistency with GMP Transportation Element Policy 5. 1, Mitigation requirements have been previously addressed and satisfied in prior approvals. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition revised on November 10, 2010. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 Page 5 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev 3: 11/19/10 Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition SRAA- PL2010 -1988 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval as described by the accompanying resolution. Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 Page 6 of 7 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev 3: 11/19/10 PREPARED BY: KAY D SELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: RAYAOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — V/cv�-'z JITYLIAM D. LO- RE , JR., P- Y, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: NICK CASALANG A, EP Y' IS TOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: I & :. : • 1► . • 1: u 1119 �o DATE //•/D•/0 NEW l- I0 -2.vr® DATE I / -1v -/() DATE DATE Tentatively scheduled for the December 14, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Town of Ave Maria SRA, SRAA- PL2010 -1988 December 2, 2010 CCPC Rev: 11/9/10 RESOLUTION NO. 10 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBERS 2004 -89 AND 2005 -234A FOR THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA STEWARDSHIP RECEIVING AREA TO REVISE THE SRA MASTER PLAN TO DIVIDE TOWN CENTER 2 INTO TOWN CENTER 2a AND TOWN CENTER 2b; TO RELOCATE TOWN CENTER 2b TO OIL WELL ROAD AND TO RELOCATE AN ACCESS POINT ON OIL WELL ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF OIL WELL ROAD AND WEST OF CAMP KEAIS ROAD IN SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PETITION SRAA- PL2010 -1988) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Town of Ave Maria Stewardship Sending Area (SRA) by Resolution No. 2004 -89 on March 23, 2004 and Resolution No. 2005 -234A on June 14, 2005; and WHEREAS, as part of the approval of the SRA, the Board approved the Ave Maria Town Plan and Master Plan; and WHEREAS, Ave Maria Development LLLP has applied for an amendment to the Ave Maria Master Plan in accordance with Section 4.08.07.F.4. of the LDC and Appendix D of the Ave Maria Town Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. The Master Plan is hereby amended and replaced with the Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution. 2. Except as set forth herein, the Ave Maria Town Plan shall remain in full force and effect. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted this day of , 2010, after motion, second, and favorable vote. (_ - Ave Maria Town Center / SRAA- PL2010 -1988 11/08/10 1 of 2 IR ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A - SRA Master Plan CP\ 10- CPS - 01071 \3 Ave Maria Town Center / SRAA- PL2010 -1988 11/08/10 2 of 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FRED W. COYLE, Chairman 0 o n C A M P K E A I S R O A D 0 WRA TUTI CORE / 1 OOMMUNItt ,,l �1 I WRA NE Land Use Summary - --- ----' °------ 300' FSA Buffer University District 956Acres Town Core 24 Acres Town Centers 265Acres Neighborhood General 3495Acres Services District 39 Acres "! »'4 Community Parks 74 Acres Other 174 Acres Total 5027Acres GW —nE Q Q O J Q W 3 t x wMivxm .. f ..,. 6Y ,,,y 1. I , _:,�_ i I @ i' �1' — EAAN .1 ,S, uWVEasnO�STRCt s''4.. °. -wtbL NEgIIOIyIOOp 1• -.'\•/ `- I -� W �'` aEHEnu —� l! xEwneowaoo cEnE¢u n �_—y � •- v �� ;_ _ � fir; _ - lid � / _ j J /,`l__ -`� TOWN CENfFA ]b ��1 O ° °a UNIVERSITY DISTRICT •; -. i�Y��.�'� cawEE sa WRA W RA t �r ��1�� NEGlGRgODOFNEp/! W ME OXIGNI000\6F\`i1ERifll WRA E / WRA i F 0 875' 1750' 3500' HSA 1 ) ` r / ' I HSA i r' FSA © u ig re HSA SCALE HSA'I FSA l SRA Master Plan P ,._ . -- - (Revised October 20, 2010) Town Plan The Town of Ave Maria Page 6 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # q-D okwf v,EETING DATE �� &OIL) (Circle Meeting Type) AGENDA ITEM TITLE NAME ADDRESS /6 Representing/ Petitioner: 1 w " E Other: Regular Special Workshop Budget L �g C.f ` 9(l r d �.s c COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPI FTFn FnDM nKI -rue -rAnl � I --... __. _.._ __ _ __ _ _ _ . (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # MEETING DATE (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE NAME ADDRESS i Representing/ Petitioner: Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) r METING DATE De& c m 64 r , )Ole) AGENDA ITEM TITLE ?C+ t d n Doi U/a / �s Agenda Item # (Circle Meeting Type) Regulap Special Workshop 11A get on SPi� A- P"0/G - i 9�4r- NAME �A f �Te it 5e v� ADDRESS S Representing /Petitioner: �p5 -'r% �� Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR ni AI^C t-nMDI F:TFn FnRM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE /Z `' Z`° e' AGENDA ITEM TITL Agenda Item # (Circle Meet' Type) NAME '1 z T 5 ADDRESS S A Representing/ Petitioner: "d �,�,� /d lA Regular.' Special Workshop Budget �cr S;R0 LZo IO - 1484 Other: rI COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT MEETING DATE 2 CLEARLY) Agenda Item # —%6&IF 1-0/0 AGENDA ITEM TITLE D /� ��%� Jfl Kip �J NAME J- 6(, L) IqA 0 M A Representing/ Petitioner: (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget Z- 4-4 C ADDRESS 5—?16 Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # % y� MEETING DATE "' �/ �, (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget �� g AGENDA ITEM TITLE 41 NAME Representing ADDRESS y7', Other: '0(x Y- COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) MEETING DATE I � — '�N /0 Agenda Item # 4vc VA4'o- (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Bu get AGENDA ITEM TITLE A 4 ' 6461dqz hg4' -1ah r NAME ` C ADDRESS 1-00 SrC11V0CQC �/� '�1 tL Representing/ Petitioner: Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) Agenda Item # C% �I, ` MEETING DATE (Circle Meeting Type) Regular Special Workshop Budget AGENDA ITEM TITLE �''y � 'vim /'y? '� NAME71:�>O-"j Representing /Petitioner: ADDRESS Sr ,qs �' � / S -' ' ``- ' i � S' 6. Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004 -05 AND 2007 -24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOU COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PRIOR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD 4DI41F tPulte November 30, 2010 Mr. Nick Casalanguida, Administrator Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: The Town of Ave Maria Development Order and SRA Amendment Dear Mr. Casalanguida: We understand that Ave Maria Development, LLLP, the developer of the Town of Ave Maria, has filed applications to amend the Town of Ave Maria DRI and SRA to reposition approximately 50 acres from the Town Center located on Camp Keais Road to a Town Center on Oil Well Road, and to relocate the western -most access point further east near the relocated Town Center 2b. Pulte Home Corporation owns the property north of Anthem Parkway and north of the proposed relocated 150 acre Town Center. As the adjacent property owner, Pulte Homes Corporation supports the application and consequently, has no objection to the repositioning of approximately 50 acres of Town Center from Camp Keais Road to Oil Well Road nor to the relocation of the access point along Oil Well Road. Sincerely, Pulte Home Corporation r,q C6.� Richard McCormick Vice President, Land South Florida Division cc: David Genson, PE Alan Reynolds, ACIP 9240 Estero Park Commons Blvd., Suite 1 Estero, Florida 33928 239.495.4800 239.495.4898 (Fax) pultegroupinc.com 1075.2010. 220524- Vec1- MPERRY 07213 - 000.003 • PPHS - 33360 7 f 4014F November 30, 2010 Mr. Nick Casalanguida, Administrator Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: The Town of Ave Maria Development Order and SRA Amendment Dear Mr. Casalanguida: We understand that Ave Maria Development, LLLP, the developer of -the Town of Ave Maria, has filed applications to amend the Town of Ave Maria DRI and SRA to reposition approximately 50 acres from the Town Center located on Camp Keais Road to a' Town Center on Oil Well Road, and to relocate the western -most access point further east near the relocated Town Center 2b. Del Webb Naples Community Association, Inc. is the owner and operator of the Del Webb Golf Course and the representative of the residents of the Del Webb Naples community. As an adjacent property owner, Del Webb Naples Community Association has no objection to the repositioning of approximately 50 acres of Town Center from Camp Keais Road to Oil Well Road nor to the relocation of the access point along Oil Well Road. Sincerely, Del Webb Naples Community Association, Inc. Scott Brooks President cc: David Genson, PE Alan Reynolds, ACIP 9240 Estero Park Commons Blvd. Estero, FL 33928 Phone: 239.495.4800 Fax: 239.495.4898 10/Yl010- 220521- Ver. I - fAPERRV 07213000-M -PM-n M Municode Page of 50 Update the RLSA Overlay Ma and Official Zoning Atlas. The Official Zoning Atlas al e E0 P Y P 9 9 updated to reflect the designation of the SSA. Sufficient information shall be included o the updated zoning maps so as to direct interested parties to the appropriate public records associated with the designation, including but not limited to Resolution number and SSA Designation Application number. The RLSA Overlay Map shall be updated to reflect the SSA designation during a regular growth management cycle no later that twelve months from the effective date of the SSA Agreement. F. SSA Amendments. Collier County shall consider an amendment to an approved SSA in the same manner described in this Section for the designation of an SSA. Amendment(s) to approved SSAs shall only be considered if the application removes one or more additional Land Use Layers from the existing SSA. Under no circumstances shall Land Use Layers, once removed as part of an SSA designation, be added back to the SSA. The application to amend the SSA may be submitted as part of an application to designate a new SSA provided such lands are contiguous to the previously approved SSA and are under the same ownership. (Ord. No. 05 -27, § 32) 4.08.07 - SRA Designation SRA designation is intended to encourage and facilitate uses that enable economic prosperity and diversification of the economic base of the RLSA District, and encourage development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques and facilitates a compact form of development to accommodate population growth by the establishment of SRAs. Stewardship Credits generated from SSAs are exchanged for additional residential or non - residential entitlements in an SRA on a per acre basis as set forth herein. Density and intensity within the RLSA District shall not be increased beyond the Baseline Standards except through the provisions of the Stewardship Credit System, the affordable housing density Bonus as referenced in the density Rating System of the FLUE, and the density and intensity blending provision of the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The procedures for the establishment and transfer of Credits and SRA designation are set forth herein. Credits can be transferred only to lands within the RLSA District that meet the defined suitability criteria and standards set forth herein. Land becomes designated as an SRA on the date that the SRA Credit Agreement becomes effective pursuant to Section 4.08.07 DA 1. Any change in the residential density or non residential intensity of land use on a parcel of land located within an SRA shall be specified in the resolution, which shall reflect the total number of transferable Credits assigned to the parcel of land. A. Lands Within the RLSA District that can be Designated as SRAs. All privately owned lands within the RLSA District that meet the suitability criteria contained herein may be designated as SRA, except lands delineated on the RLSA Overlay Map as FSA, HSA, or WRA, or lands already designated as an SSA. WRAs may be located within the boundaries of an SRA and may be incorporated into an SRA Master Plan to provide water management functions for properties within such SRA, subject to all necessary permitting requirements. 1. Suitability Criteria. The following suitability criteria are established to ensure consistency with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the RLSA Overlay. a. An SRA must contain sufficient suitable land to accommodate the planned development. b. Residential, commercial, manufacturing /light industrial, group housing, and transient housing, institutional, civic and community service uses within an SRA shall not be sited on lands that receive a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2. C. Conditional use essential services and governmental essential services, with the exception of those necessary to serve permitted uses and for public safety, shall not be sited on land that receives a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2, regardless of the size of the land or parcel. d. Lands or parcels that are greater than one acre and have an Index Value greater than 1.2 shall be retained as open space and maintained in a predominantly natural vegetated state. e. Open space shall also comprise a minimum of thirty -five percent of the gross acreage of an individual SRA Town, Village, or those CRDs exceeding 100 acres. Gross acreage includes only that area of development within the SRA that requires the consumption of Stewardship Credits. f. As an incentive to encourage open space, open space on lands within an SRA located outside of the ACSC that exceeds the required thirty -five percent retained open space shall not be required to consume Stewardship Credits. g. An SRA may be contiguous to an FSA or HSA, but shall not encroach into such areas, and shall buffer such areas as described in Section 4.08.07 J.6. An SRA may be contiguous to, or encompass a WRA. h. http: // library. municode .com / print. aspx? clientID = 13992 &HTMRequest= http %3 a %2f%2fl... 11/19/2010 Municode Page 22 of 50 The SRA must have either direct access to a County collector or arterial road or indirect access via a road provided by the developer that has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development in accordance with accepted transportation planning standards. 2. SRAs Within the ACSC. SRAs are permitted within the ACSC subject to limitations on the number, size, location, and form of SRA described herein. Nothing within this Section shall be construed as an exemption of an SRA from any and all limitations and regulations applicable to lands within the ACSC. Lands within the ACSC that meet all SRA suitability criteria shall also be restricted such that credits used to entitle an SRA in the ACSC must be generated exclusively from SSAs within the ACSC. No early entry bonus credits can be used to entitle an SRA within the ACSC. a. The only forms of SRA allowed in the ACSC east of the Okaloacoochee Slough shall be Hamlets and CRDs of 100 acres or less and the only forms of SRA allowed in the ACSC west of the Okaloacoochee Slough shall be Villages and CRDs of not more than 300 acres and Hamlets. Provided, however, two SRAs, consisting of any combination of Villages or CRDs of not more than 500 acres each, exclusive of any lakes created prior to the effective date of this amendment as a result of mining operations, shall be allowed in areas that have a frontage on State Road 29 and that, as of the effective date of the RLSA Overlay, had been predominantly cleared as a result of Ag Group I (Layer 5) or Earth Mining or Processing Uses (Layer 3). b. The Town form of an SRA shall not be located within the ACSC. B. Establishment and Transfer of Stewardship Credits. The procedures for the establishment and transfer of Credits and SRA designation are set forth herein. Stewardship Credits will be exchanged for additional residential or non - residential entitlements in an SRA on a per acre basis, as described in Section 4.08.07 B.2. Stewardship density and intensity will thereafter differ from the Baseline Standards. 1. Transfer of Credits. The transfer or use of Stewardship Credits shall only be in a manner as provided for herein. a. Stewardship Credits generated from any SSA may be transferred to entitle any SRA, except where the SRA is within the ACSC, in which case only Stewardship Credits that have been generated from an SSA within the ACSC can be used to entitle such SRA. No early entry bonus credits can be used to entitle an SRA within the ACSC. b. Credits can be transferred only to lands within the RLSA that meet the defined suitability criteria and standards set forth herein. C. Stewardship Credits may be transferred between different parcels or within a single parcel, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of these policies. Residential clustering shall only occur within the RLSA District through the use of the Stewardship Credit System, and other forms of residential clustering shall not be permitted. d. Stewardship Credits may be acquired from any credit holder and transferred to an SRA subject to the limitations contained in this Section. e. Stewardship Credits may be acquired from a Stewardship Credit Trust established pursuant to Section 4.08.04 B., and transferred to an SRA subject to the limitations contained in this Section. 2. Stewardship Credit Exchange. Stewardship Credits shall be exchanged for additional residential or non - residential entitlements in an SRA on a per acre basis at a rate of eight (8) Stewardship Credits per gross acre. Lands within an SRA greater than one acre, with Index Values of greater than 1.2, shall be retained as open space and maintained in a predominantly natural, vegetated state. Any such lands within an SRA located outside of the ACSC exceeding the required thirty - five (35) percent shall not be required to consume Stewardship Credits. 3. Public Benefit Uses. The acreage within an SRA devoted to a public benefit use shall not be required to consume Stewardship Credits and shall not count toward the maximum acreage limits of an SRA. For the purpose of this Section, public benefit uses are limited to public schools (preK- 12) and public or private post secondary institutions, Post Secondary Institution Ancillary Uses, community parks exceeding the minimum requirement of 200 square feet per dwelling unit, municipal golf courses, regional parks, and governmental facilities excluding essential services as defined in the LDC. 4. Mixed Land Use Entitlements. In order to promote compact, mixed use development and provide the necessary support facilities and services to residents of rural areas, the SRA designation and the transfer of the Stewardship Credits allows for a full range of uses, accessory uses and associated uses that provide a mix of services to and are supportive to the residential population of an SRA and the RLSA District. SRAs are intended to be mixed use and shall be allowed the full range of uses permitted by the Urban Designation of the FLUE, as modified by Policies 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.7.3, 4.7.4 and RLSA Overlay Attachment C. Depending on the size, scale, and character of an SRA, it shall be designed to include an appropriate mix of retail, office, recreational, civic, governmental, and institutional uses, in addition to residential uses. http: // library. municode .com /print.aspx ?clientID =13 992& HTMRequest= http %3a %2f%2fl... 11/19/2010 Municode D�N �� Page 26 of 50 �s E. The SRA master plan depicting the land uses and identifying the number of residential dwelling units, gross leaseable area of retail and office square footage and other land uses depicted on the master plan; (4) A description of the SSA credits that are needed to entitle the SRA land and the anticipated source of said credits; (5) The applicant's acknowledgement that development of SRA land may not commence until the applicant has recorded an SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum with the Collier County Clerk of Courts; and (6) The applicant's commitments, if any, regarding conservation, or any other restriction on development on any lands, including wetlands, within the SRA, as may be depicted on the SRA Master Plan for special treatment. C. The SRA Credit Agreement shall be effective on the latest of the following dates: (1) The date that the County approves the SRA Application; (2) The date that documentation of the applicant's acquisition of the Stewardship Credits to be utilized for the SRA is found by the County to be sufficient; or (3) Five (5) working days after the date on which the applicant submits documentation of the acquisition of the Stewardship Credits to be utilized, if the County fails to make a sufficiency determination prior to that date. d. Following approval of the SRA Application, the applicant shall record a SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum, which shall include the following: (1) A cross reference to the recorded SSA Credit Agreement Memorandum or Memoranda for the SSA lands from which the credits being utilized are generated and identification of the number of credits derived from each SSA; and (2) a legal description of the SRA lands. e. If the development provided for within an SRA constitutes, or will constitute, a development of regional impact ( "DRI ") pursuant to § 380.06 and 380.0651, F.S., and if the applicant has obtained a preliminary development agreement ( "PDA ") from the Florida Department of Community Affairs for a portion of the SRA land, the applicant may request the County to enter into a Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement for those Stewardship Credits needed in order to develop the PDA authorized development. Commencement of the PDA authorized development may not proceed until the applicant has recorded a Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum. The Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement and Preliminary SRA Credit Agreement shall include the same information and documentation as is required for an SRA Credit Agreement and an SRA Credit Agreement Memorandum. SRA Application Review Process. 1. Pre - Application Conference with County Staff: Prior to the submission of a formal application for SRA designation, the applicant shall attend a pre - application conference with the County Manager or his designee and other county staff, agencies, and officials involved in the review and processing of such applications and related materials. If an SRA designation application will be filed concurrent with an SSA application, only one pre - application conference shall be required. This pre - application conference should address, but not be limited to, such matters as: a. Conformity of the proposed SRA with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP; b. Consideration of suitability criteria described in Section 4.08.07 A.1. and other standards of this Section; C. SRA master plan compliance with all applicable policies of the RLSA District Regulations, and demonstration that incompatible land uses are directed away from FSAs, HSAs, WRAs, and Conservation Lands; d. Assurance that applicant has acquired or will acquire sufficient Stewardship Credits to implement the SRA uses, and; e. Consideration of impacts, including environmental and public infrastructure impacts. 2. Application Package Submittal and Processing Fees. The required number of SRA Applications and the associated processing fee shall be submitted to the County Manager or his designee. The contents of said application package shall be in accordance with Section 4.08.07 D. 3. Application Deemed Sufficient for Review. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the SRA Application, the County manager or his designee shall notify the applicant in writing that the application is deemed sufficient for agency review or advise what additional information is needed to find the application sufficient. If required, the applicant shall submit additional information. Within twenty (20) days of receipt of the additional information, the County Manager or his designee shall notify the applicant in writing that the application is deemed sufficient, or, what additional or revised information is required. If necessary, the County Manager shall again inform the applicant in writing of information needed, and the timeframe outlined herein shall occur until the application is found sufficient for review. 4. httD: / /Iibrarv.municode. com/i)rint.asi)x ?clientID =13 992 &HTMReci uest= http %3 a %2P /`2fl... 11/19/2010