CAC Agenda 08/12/2010 R
August 12, 2010
MEETING AGENDA &. NOTICE
MEETING AGENDA & NOTICE
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
THURSDAY, AUGUST 12, 2010 - 1:00 P.M.
TURNER BUILDING (Administrative Building F, 3rd Floor Collier County Government Center, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail,
Naples)
Sunshine Law on Aaenda Ouestions
PUBLIC NOTICE
I. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance
III. Roll Call
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
V. Public Comments
VI. Approval of CAC Minutes
1. ADril 29, 2010
2. June 10. 2010
VII. Staff Reports
1. Exoanded Revenue ReDort - Gary McAloin
a. TDC Revenue Analvsis
2. Proiect Cost ReDort - Garv McAIDin
VIII. New Business
1. Use of Fund 183 - Beach Park Facilities Monies for Emeraencv Advertisina
a. TDC MarketinG Presentation - Jack Wert
2. Peer Review Status and Discussion
3. FDEP Cost Share Grant ADolications
IX. Old Business
X. Announcements
XI. Committee Member Discussion
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
September 9, 2010 - Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
XIII. Adjournment
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board
prior to the meeting if applicable.
For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at (239) 252-2966.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no
cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at
3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380.
Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time.
Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not
limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards,
register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department.
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Anthony P. Pires, Jr., Esq., Chairman
Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee
Colleen M. Greene, Assistant County Attorne~0
March 18,2010
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Sunshine Law and Agenda question
The issue presented is whether the Sunshine Law requires that an agenda be made available prior
to board meetings. In summary, the answer is no.
The Sunshine Law Manual (2009 Ed. Vol. 31) provides the following:
The Attorney General's Office recommends publication of an agenda, if available, in the notice
of the meeting; if an agenda is not available, subject matter summations might be used.
However, the courts have held that the Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency provide
notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda. Sueh a specific requirement has been
rejected because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the general
public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body. See Hough v. Stembridge,
278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st
DCA 1985) (posted agenda unnecessary; public body not required to postpone meeting due to
inaccurate press report which was not part of the public body's official notice efforts). Thus, the
Sunshine Law has been interpreted to require notice of meetings, not of the individual items
which may be considered at that meeting. However, other statutes, codes or ordinances may
impose such a requirement and agencies subject to those provisions must follow them.
Accordingly, the Sunshine Law does not require boards to consider only those matters on a
published agenda. "[W]hether to impose a requirement that restricts every relevant commission
or board from considering matters not on an agenda is a policy decision to be made by the
legislature." Law and Information Services, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So. 2d 1014, 1016
(Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Today's Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee was properly noticed in
compliance with the Sunshine Law on or about February I, 2010. Further, the agenda for
today's meeting was also publically noticed on the County's website on Monday, March IS,
2010. The related back-up materials for the agenda were supplemented and available on the
County's website on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. In addition, a number of these materials also
appeared on the agenda for the Coastal Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday, March II,
2010.
In my opinion, there is no violation of the Sunshine Law and no legal issue regarding the date the
agenda was published.
cc: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management
CAC August 12, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
10f6
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, April 29, 2010
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory
Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business
Herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in SPECIAL SESSION at
Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government
Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, III
VICE CHAIRMAN: Anthony Pires
Murray Hendel
Jim Burke
Victor Rios
Robert Raymond
Joseph A. Moreland (Excused)
John Arceri
Wayne Waldack
ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney
Gail Hambright, Accountant
Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples
III.
VII.
VIII.
CAe August 12, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAG Minutes
2 af6
I.
Call to Order
Chairman Sorey called the meeting to order at I :00 P.M.
II.
Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
RollCall
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
IV.
Changes and Approval of Agenda
Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following addition:
Item VIII - New Business - Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Update - Dan Summers
Second by Mr. ArcerL Carried unanimously 8-0.
V.
Public Comments
None
VI.
Approval of Minutes
None
Staff Reports
None
New Business
Dan Summers, Director, Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services presented
a Slideshow on the funetions of the Bureau of Emergency Services and an update on
the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The County is monitoring the situation closely
and prepared to implement any necessary actions immediately, if required. Collier
County does not stock the necessary amounts of dispersants or other materials that
may be required to deal with an oil slick of this potential magnitude and will rely on
outside Agencies to provide assistance.
1. Naples Beach Emergency Renourishment
Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management presented the Executive
Summary "Recommendation to approve the Doctors Pass and North Park Shore
Emergency Beach Renourishment Resolution, make a finding that these beaches
are critically eroded and TDC funds can be usedfor renourishment, authorize the
expedited handling of a truck haul/inland sand source pennit modification, waive
the formal competitive thresholds in the Purchasing Policy based on a valid
public emergency, and authorize the expenditure of up to $1.5M Category A
Tourist Development Funds and authorize necessary budget Amendments" dated
April 29, 2010 for review. He noted:
. At the previous CAC meeting, the Committee recommended an
expenditure of $375,000 for placement of 10,000 CY of sand to address
eroded beach hot spots in areas south (in front of Gulf View and Indies
West condominiums) and north of Doctors Pass (Park Shore Beach).
CAC August 12, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
30fB
. It is now estimated approximately 40,000 CY of sand will be required to
stabilize the area for a 3-year period as it is eroding.
. The Biological Opinion issued under the existing permits re-nourishment
template requires work to be completed by a May I deadline.
. Staff is in the process of obtaining a permit amendment and new
Biological Opinion.
. Staff is recommending (as an emergeney measure before the permit
amendment is granted) placing approximately 2000 - 3000 CY of sand be
placed in an area just South of Doctors Pass, on the dune landward of the
current Mean High Water in front of Gulf View and Indies West
condominiums.
. The remaining 37,000 CY of sand will be placed on the beach at both
locations (on the seaward and landward side of the MHW) after new
Biologieal Opinion and permit modifications are issued.
Mr. Hendel expressed concern the area just south of Doctors Pass should be
deemed a greater emergency than the Park Shore Beach area and requested
clarification on why the necessity to address the Park Shore Beach area at this
time.
Gary McAlpin noted both areas are in need of repair and should be deemed an
"emergency." The area south of Doe tors Pass is more eroded, but the intent is to
combine the projects for an overall cost saving basis and attempt to prevent a
possible re-mobilization to re-nourish the Park Shore area over the next year or
two, before the next re-nourishment Cycle. The sand placed in these areas should
remain until the next re-nourishment Cycle and possibly reduce the amount of re-
nourishment required at that time.
Mr. Pires expressed concern public funds are being utilized to stabilize beaches
on private properties. Florida Statutes require public monies to be spent for
public purposes. He expressed concern private property is being re-nourished in
areas where the public does not have access.
Gary McAlpin noted County Policy has allowed re-nourishment in the past, via
private property easements to allow placement of sand and access of construction
vehicles.
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney noted the Committee should make
a finding that the activity primarily serves a public purpose. Past Attorney
General Opinions provide for the expenditure based on that finding.
Gary McAlpin will check which areas under consideration for re-nourishment
have been deemed "critically eroded beaches."
Colleen Greene noted the County will need to review the requirements for
waiving purchasing policies under Collier County Purchasing Policies and the
State of Florida Statutes.
CAC August 12, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
4of6
Sneakers
Michael Fields noted the area continues to erode at a rapid rate and expressed
concern over the position being taken by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) with regard to the protection of sea turtle
nesting areas. The areas in question lacks suitable nesting habitat due to the
beach erosion. He noted FDEP's refusal on the County's request to place dredged
sand on the beach outside of Indies West and Gulf view last year has hindered the
situation. The areas should be repaired before structural damage occurs creating a
more expensive repair.
Hans Gruenberg, Gulf Shore Property Owners Assoc. noted the property
owners in the area support the effort to repair the beaches and the situation should
be deemed an "emergency." On a related note the property owners in the area are
against using any beach funds allocated to beaches for other purposes.
Sarah Wu, Seagate Resident noted at high tide, there is no beach available.
Public beach access should be prohibited as their attempts to access the beach
may cause environmental damage along the dune area.
Mr. Hendel moved to recommend approval of the emergency resolution to
stabilize the beach by placing 2000 - 3000 CY of sand proposed for the frontage
of Gulf View and Indies West condominiums.
Without a second the motion was not considered.
Chairman Sorey recommended the Committee review the 6 recommendations
provided on page 2 of the Executive Summary and take action.
Recommendation #1
Mr. Burke moved to recommend an Emergency Resolution be approved
authorizing the use of emergency measures and funds to address this severe
beach erosion and that action must be taken immediately. Second by Mr.
Raymond. Carried unanimously 8-0.
Recommendation #2
Mr. Arceri moved to find that both the Doctor's Pass Beach and the North
Park Shore Beach are "critically eroded." Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried
unanimously 8-0.
Recommendation #3
Mr. Rios moved the emergency re-nourishment is eligible for TDC Category
"A" Funding. Second by Mr. Burke.
Mr. Pires expressed concern on the possible lack of public access to the private
properties where the sand is being placed. The current easements from property
CAC August 12, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
50f6
owners only allow construction activities (ingress and egress of equipment and
sand being placed).
Chairman Sorey noted the activity is consistent with established County Policy.
Mr. Pires reeommended that as the County moves forward, they obtain public
access easements from private property owner's whose properties are re-
nourished with the expenditure of public funds.
Colleen Greene recommended the motion include a finding there is a public
purpose and benefits for the activity.
Mr. Rios amended the motion to "the emergency re-nourishment is eligible for
TDC Category "A" Funding, and serves a public purpose." Second by Mr.
Burke. Motion carried 7 'yes" - 1 "no." Mr. Pires voted "no."
Mr. Pires voted "no" due to his concerns outlined regarding public access.
Recommendation #4
Mr. Pires moved the formal competitive threshold in the Purchasing Policy and
any other applicable State Statutes be waived based on a valid public
emergency. Second by Mr. Rios. Carried unanimously 8-0.
Recommendation #5
Chairman Sorey noted the expenditure is for approximately 38,000 CY of sand
to fill the template landward and seaward of the Erosion Control Line.
Mr. Hendel recommended the expenditure be "$1.5M" as opposed to "up to
$1.5M."
Mr. Rios moved to recommend an expenditure of $1. 5M in TDC Category "A"
Funding to accomplish this project. Second by Mr. Raymond.
Motion carried 7 'yes" - 1 "no." Mr. Pires voted "no."
Mr. Pires voted "no" due to his concerns outlined regarding public access.
Recommendation #6
Mr. Arceri moved to recommend authorization of the necessary budget
amendments. Second by Mr. Rios. Motion carried 7 'yes" - 1 "no."
Mr. Pires voted "no."
Gary McAlpin noted "public purposes" include concern over possible damage to
structures and public infrastructure (buildings, roadways, sewers, utilities, etc.)
a. Declare an Emergency Renourishment Situation
See item VIlLI
GAG August 12, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAG Minutes
6of6
b. Resolution for Emergency Renourishment
Gary McAlpin presented a proposed Resolution (no. 10-_) entitled "A
Resolution oJthe Board of County Commissioners oJCollier County, Florida
declaring critically eroded beaches in the City oj Naples to require emergency
renourishment and making findings to support the public purpose oj
renourishment for review.
Mr. Rios moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve
the proposed Resolution. Second by Mr. Raymond. Motion carried 7 'yes"
- 1 "no." Mr. Pires voted "no. "
IX. Old Business
None
X. Announcements
None
XI. Committee Member Discussion
Mr. Hendel thanked Gary and Staff for executing the plantings in front ofLe Parc,
Park Plaza, etc. and addressing the signs and rope in disrepair in front of the Park
Shore condominiums.
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
May 13, 2010 - Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
There being no further business for the good ofthe County, the meeting was
adjourned by order ofthe chair at 2:27 P.M.
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
John Sorey, III, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on
as presented or as amended
GAG August 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of GAG Minutes
10f9
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, June 10,2010
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory
Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business
Herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at
Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government
Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, III
VICE CHAIRMAN: Anthony Pires
Murray Hendel (Excused)
Jim Burke
Victor Rios
Robert Raymond
Joseph A. Moreland
John Arceri
Wayne Waldack (Excused)
ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney
Gail Hambright, Accountant
Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples
CAC August 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of CAC Minutes
20f9
I. Call to Order
Chairman Sorey called the meeting to order at I :00 P.M.
II. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following addition:
Item VII.6 - Update on redirection of Beach Reserve Funds to Advertising
Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 7-0.
V. Pnblic Comments
None
VI. Approval of CAC Minntes
1. April 8, 2010
Mr. Burke moved to approve the minutes of the April 8, 2010 meeting subject to
the following additions:
Page 4 -. Paragraph 8 .- Under Mr. Pires comments "Mr. Pires expressed
concern on expending public funds on any private property landward of
the erosion control line without public access to those portions of the
beach. "
Second by Mr. Rios. Carried unanimously 7-0.
VII. Staff Reports
1. Expanded Revenue Report - Gary McAlpin
The Committee reviewed the "Tourist Tax Revenue Report- FY 2009 - 2010"
updated through May 20 I O. He noted revenue collections are below projections
for the F iscal Year.
Chairman Sorey requested Staff provide an analysis at the next meeting on the
impact of the Department's expenditures based on the revenue shortfall
projections.
2. Project Cost Report - Gary McAlpin
The Committee reviewed the "FY 2009/2010 TDC Category "A: Beach
Maintenance Projects" updated through June 2, 2010.
3. Emergency Beaeh Renourishment Approach
Gary McAlpin presented the document "Emergency Renourishment
Approach/Discussion" dated 6/1 0/20 I 0 for review. He noted:
. It is not anticipated the new FDEP permit for the Emergency Re-
nourishment will be issued prior to the onset of "Hurricane Season."
CAC August 12, 2010
VI+2 Approval of CAC Minutes
30f9
. Based on this, the BCC directed Staff to conduct a "two pronged"
approach for renourishing the area south of Doctors Pass.
. The approach includes "Phase I" - placing 2 - 3K CY of sand on the
existing vegetated areas (not in the vicinity of Sea Turtles nesting)
adjacent to Indies West.
. "Phase II" - placement of the remaining 37K - 40 CY of sand after the
neeessary permit is reeeived from the FDEP.
· The new FDEP permit requires a revised Biological Opinion from the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, which is currently
under review.
. If the FDEP permit is obtained before "Phase I" is initiated, Staff will
undertake the original proposal of completing a major re-nourishment in
the area.
. There will be a site visit on Friday, June 11, with Staff, the public,
affected property owners, engineer of record, etc. to be in attendance.
Chairman Sorey noted if more than one CAC member is present at the site visit,
no communications will be permitted.
Mr. Pires questioned the status of obtaining public use easements from any
property owners where the sand will be placed on private property.
Gary McAlpin noted Staff has not had a chance to address the issue; however it
will during the next major (Countywide) beach re-nourishment cycle.
Speaker
Margaret Grant, Indies West provided recent photographs of the area and
requested clarification on the areas the sand would be placed and if any vegetation
will be covered with the sand.
Gary McAlpin noted the purpose of the site visit was to visually show
individuals where the sand will be placed. Not all of the vegetation will be
covered, only that neeessary to stabilize the area.
4. Oil Spill - Update
Gary McAlpin presented a letter from Dan Summers, Director of the Collier
County Bureau of Emergency Services to Nancy Richy, City of Marco Island-
"Re: Deepwater Horizon Response - Council Update" dated June 7, 2010 and a
letter to Kevin Rambosk, Collier County Sherriff from Dan Summers. An update
on the oil spill was provided noting:
. The County has not been physically affeeted by the Oil Spill at this point.
. The County is expecting the negative effects of the Oil Spill to be in the
form of tar balls or a very light sheen as opposed to floating oil slicks.
. The loop current moves to the west of the Collier County beaches which
will assist in minimizing possible impacts to the area.
. The Unified Command (UC) is in control of operations in the region and
is loeated in St. Petersburg. The County is in contact daily.
CACAugust 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of CAC Minutes
4of9
. For expenditures related to the spill, the County must follow the proper
chains of command through the UC to ensure reimbursement of any work
completed.
. The County is in a "wait and see" mode on the spill and will react
immediately when neeessary.
Under Committee discussion, the following was noted:
. The contingency Plan for protecting the inlets and estuaries for the state
of Florida will be uploaded to the Coastal Advisory Committee and
Bureau of Emergency Services for public view.
. Staff will email members the information on the two advertising grants
awarded (due to the Oil Spill) to Visit Florida who is advertising for
tourism at the statewide level.
Mr. Rios expressed concern and lack of confidence in the Uc. It is his
observation that the various agencies are hesitant to take initiatives to correct
emergency situations as funds expended will not be reimbursed from BP without
advance authorization. This is hindering immediate responses to crisis situations.
Gary McAlpin noted the UC has been responsive to the County. The UC is the
required party for the County to process any proposed expenditures to ensure
reimbursement of funds.
In addition the following was noted:
. Any volunteering should be conducted through various organizations as
opposed to individual efforts.
· The County should consider having consultants on "stand-by" should
emergency permits be required to address any environmental issues.
Speaker
Linda Roth noted the FDEP and the City of Naples have completed advance
water quality testing to establish baseline water quality data before any effects
from the oil spill are seen in the City. She asked if the FDEP and the County are
collecting similar data.
5. Outfall Pipes - Update
Gary McAlpin provided a letter from A. William Moss, Naples City Manager to
Mr. John Iglehart, Director, FDEP, South District Office, Subject: "Permit File
No. 0222355-001-JC, City of Naples Beach Storm water Outfalls" dated June 6,
2010. He noted the following:
. A FDEP permit condition for the last major beach re-nourishment permit
required the City of Naples develop a plan to address the City's
storm water outfall pipes.
· The plan was to be in place before issuanee of the next major beach re-
nourishment project (slated for 2012/l3).
. At this point, the City has determined the outfalls have not had a negative
impact on water quality.
VIII.
CACAugust12,2010
VI-2 Approval of CAG Minutes
50f9
· The City continues to address the issue and is requesting the FDEP
remove the permit condition from the existing permit.
6. Update on redirection of Beach Reserve Funds to Advertising
Gary McAlpin noted at a recent BCC meeting, a decision on the proposal by the
Tourist Development Council for re-directing the "2,d million" from the
Emergency Beach Reserves to a Marketing and Advertising Program has been
postponed until the fall of 20 10.
New Business
1. Election of Chair and Vice Chair
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Election of Chairman and
Vice Chairman" dated June 10,2010.
Mr. Burke moved to nominate John Sorey, III as Chairman of the Coastal
Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Moreland. Carried unanimously 7-0.
Mr. Burke moved to nominate Anthony Pires as Vice Chairman of the Coastal
Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Arceri. Carried unanimously 7-0.
2. Summer Schedule
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Determine summer schedule
for CAC meetings" dated June 10,2010.
The Committee determined to continue to hold monthly meetings. If the
Chairman determines it is not necessary to hold the regularly scheduled
meeting, it will be cancelled.
3. Marco South Renourishment Plan
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve
the attached engineering proposal dated 6/7/2010 from Coastal Engineering
Consultants to renourish the Marco South Beaches and investigate if additional
or modified erosion control structures would lengthen the renourishment cycle for
this beach" dated June 10, 20 I 0 for consideration.
Under Committee discussion the following was noted:
. Staff is attempting to develop a long-term solution to the "beach hot spot"
and lengthen the renourishment eycle.
. Any proposed modifications to erosion control structures should take into
account the impacts on navigation.
. The engineering study should take approximately 6 months to complete
and will be subject to Peer Review.
· Staffwill continue to monitor the beaches and ifrenourishment is
required before 2013, it may be completed as necessary.
. There are six tasks proposed in the Contract however there is an option to
complete the Contract in Phases.
. Phase I, (Task I, II and !II) through the preliminary design phase could be
completed at an expense of $200,000, with the remaining tasks (IV, V
CACAugust 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of CAC Minutes
6of9
and VI) returned to the Coastal Advisory Committee for the authorization
after completion of Phase I.
Mr. Pires questioned if the County utilized the 4 step process required in the
Competitive Consultants Negations Act (CCNA) for proposing the contract?
Colleen Greene noted the eontract has been prepared in accordance with the
CCNA process.
Mr. Arceri moved to recommend approval of Tasks I, II and III at a cost of
$200,000 with the understanding the Study will include an evaluation for the
impacts on navigation. Second by Mr. Rios.
Mr. Pires noted an Attorney General's Opinion issued June 7, 2010 (2010-20)
indicated this particular Contract proposal was not completed in accordance with
the CCNA. He recommended the County re-evaluate the Contract and return it
through the CCNA process.
Colleen Greene re-iterated it is the County's opinion the proposed Contract is in
compliance with the CCNA process for a "fixed term contract."
Motion carried 6 'yes" -] "no." Mr. Pires voted "no."
Mr. Pires voted "no" because, in his opinion, the proposed Contract has not been
completed in conformance with the requirements of the CCNA.
4. Yearly Physical Beach Monitoring Contract
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve
Yearly PhYSical Beach and Inlet Monitoring Contract as proposed by PBS&J
dated June 10,2010 for review.
Mr. Rios moved to recommend approval of the Contract. Second by Mr.
Moreland. Motion carried 6 'yes" -] "no." Mr. Pires voted "no."
Mr. Pires voted "no" because, in his opinion, the proposed contract has not been
completed in conformance with the requirements ofthe CCNA.
5. Wiggins Pass FY 11 Dredging Engineering
Gary McAlpin presented the Exeeutive Summary "Recommendation to approve
Wiggins Pass FY 11 Dredging Engineering as proposed by CP&E" dated June
10, 20 10 for review.
Mr. Rios moved to recommend approval of the Contract. Second by Mr. Arceri.
Motion carried 6 'yes" - 1 "no." Mr. Pires voted "no."
Mr. Pires voted "no" because, in his opinion, the proposed contract has not been
completed in conformance with the requirements of the CCNA.
CAC August 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of CAC Minutes
7of9
6. Change Order No.3 PBS&J for Clam Pass/Bay
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve
the attached Change Order to PBS&J's contract for Clam Pass/Bay required to
address additional information requested by FDEP and the USACEjiJr the Clam
Pass maintenance dredging permit" dated June 1 0, 20 I 0 for review.
Mr. Arceri noted the purpose of the dredging is to ensure the Clam Bay Estuary
System (CBES) is allowed to properly flush itself. He requested Staff provide the
following information should legal action ensue preventing issuance of the
dredging permit:
. At what point in time does the lack of dredging impair the systems ability
to flush itself causing damage to the CBES?
. How does the pending litigation affect the County's ability to obtain
emergency permission to open the Pass should it become impaired due to
a Storm Event?
Gary McAlpin noted Staff would provide the information to the Committee.
Mr. Arceri moved to recommend approval of the Contract. Second by Mr.
Burke. Motion carried 6 'yes" - 1 "no." Mr. Pires voted "no. "
Mr. Pires voted "no" because, in his opinion, the proposed contract has not been
completed in conformance with the requirements of the CCNA.
7. Change Order No.1 CP&E to Wiggins Pass Engineering
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approval
the attached Change Order to Coastal Planning and Engineering's scope of work
for additional Wiggins Pass permit engineering required to obtain a new permit
for Navigational Improvementsfor Wiggins Pass" dated June 10,2010 for
reView.
Mr. Moreland moved to recommend approval of the Contract (at a cost of
$49,671). Second by Mr. Raymond. Motion carried 6 'yes" -1 "no." Mr.
Pires voted "no. "
Mr. Pires voted "no" because, in his opinion, the proposed contraet has not been
completed in conformance with the requirements of the CCNA.
IX. Old Business
I. Final Version Proposal to PBSD Peer Review
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Peer Review direction as
approved by the Clam Bay Subcommittee of the Coastal Advisory Committee at
the May 20,2010 meeting -June 1,2010" dated June 10,2010.
GAG August 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of GAG Minutes
80f9
A letter was provided for review from Keith Dallas, Chairman of the PBSD to
Gary McAlpin - Re: "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review Scope of Work" dated
June 8, 2010 outlining the Division's position on the Peer Review.
The item was submitted to the Committee for informational purposes and will be
reviewed by the Clam Bay Subcommittee at their next meeting.
2. Clam Bay Informational Marker Permit
Gary McAlpin provided a letter from Ryan Moreau, Planner, Boater and
Waterway Section of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to
Pamela Keys, Environmental Specialist, Collier County, "Re: Information
Markers Clam Pass/Bay Permit 09-02I - Collier County" dated May 21, 2010.
The FFWCC has approved the informational markers proposed for Clam Bay
which will allow Staff to respond to the request for additional information issued
by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the Letter of Consent
request for Navigational Markers proposed in the CBES.
Speaker
Keith Dallas, Chairman, Pelican Bay Services Division noted the original
permit required "Canoe Markers" which should be maintained and/or replaced as
necessary. Recently the Division ordered new markers and the County had
previously requested they not be installed. He requested clarification if they
should now be installed.
Gary McAlpin noted it is Staffs position, until closure is reached on the
Navigational Markers, the "Canoe Markers" should not be installed.
X. Announcements
None
XI. Committee Member Discussion
Mr. Pires recommended, as indicated by Linda Roth, Staff engage in baseline water
quality testing to assist in determining possible negative impacts on County beaches
and inlets from the oil spill in the Gulf of Me xi eo.
Gary McAlpin noted the County is undertaking testing of this nature.
Chairman Sorey noted the Board of County Commissioners directed the Committee
to move forward with a "Public Easement Form." The purpose would be to ensure
public access on private lands where funds are being utilized landward of the erosion
control line for beach re-nourishment.
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
July 8, 2010 - Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 3: 11 P.M.
GAG August 12, 2010
VI-2 Approval of GAG Minutes
90f9
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
John Sorey, III, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on
as presented or as amended
o
o
N ~
."
~&
~&
rn",
32
<:U)ro
U ::
<: _ 0
0>_
o
-
o
"i
en
o
o
N
>
U.
t:
o
Q.
Q)
a::
Q)
"
l:
Q)
>
Q)
a::
x
..
f--
;;
."
"
o
f--
o
o
"
.
...
0:
"'..........."'''''........0
..,...,............0.........
co......._""............_...
~-::l-:;i;;!;;-~ ~-tJ;.~.
00..."''''...............
::!-~-:i~:!:!:!~-:!~.
................................
B
o
.
~
>
In!
- - - - _li'''lm!
---._co.......'"
"'::::"''''<1>''''0
~......... ..._.._.._~"'t. '
~~ri~'~~~~$
....e!:!.!:!.!:!.!:!.!:!.!:!.!:!.
1id!
}~!1
~
~
..
,
o
o
<
.~
.li
,
,
,
,
u
.......;::;:: ~ g ~:2 ::..:;;
~ ~~.:;- ~-;-::;:} ~'~
;::::!.~. !;;.5l.;;_~S'!
.......:;;~;t~:.:;;:;;;
..
.
.
,
.
..
,
o
o
<
~
-
s
,
,
,
,
o
g~~~~g~~~~~~
:~=::!-~-:~f:f:~*5~
: a~ ai g~~-::-~~':i
...................
B
,
,
>
",c:rwoN"m...;:);;;;
~;;~:;::~~~::;;:!:
<&i:g-~f-:'-~rJ-c~~g
:::ee!:!.!:!.!:!.~e!:!.e
..
~
<
..
~
.
o
.
"'oo...g::~~:;:"'N
:;:::: "'.........C>.":l:::;
:i;:;~5a~E=:a~
:::;t;:;;:;d'd':;;:;~
.
.
.
,
.
~
~
.
o
.
ooogggggOOOQ
~~ ~:-~ :;-~ ;.~~-~. ~
........................."............
:~~~~;:;;;~-a==~
.................
'&
.
,
.
..
,
o
o
<
~
::;::::~:::~~~:;~N~
..;....oci~=:!~..;..;......
~
S
"'::Q~ 0::
~i~~~~~~~~:j
.gE~!!~;:~!~&E
ti:r:li-i:;::::t.il';3!
o~~"'1I. .....,;j
t
Q
"
.
.,;
R
~
~
.-
~
::
M
Q
g
~.
,.;
M
.
~.
Ii
:f
::
Q
.
Q
g
.
a
g
c
~
.
~
~
~ '" '" ~ ~ '" 0
0 ~ '" 0 " ~ ~ '"
'" ~ ~ ~ ",,,<
<; . ~. ~. ,,' 0' o' "
N " > ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~
. " ~ ~ ~ ~...
.t: M' ..; M' ..; N~ ~
NO ~
~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
- ill
~'"
"'"' I 0 0 ~
" ro a " ~
U_ . . ~
<((f)'" , ,
U'"7"= a g a E: 3'
<:{=o ~
U>N ~
0 . . "
~ ~
^ ~ ~ a ~
,
g S M a ~'
'"
~
~
0 N '"
~. . ~
~I , ^ . 8, LI!.
.
~ & a . ~
N ~
~ ~~
~
, . . ~
~I 0 ~ ~ ~ ^ 0
. ;::;- ~~
E & & 9: ~ 0
~ .
~
~
~
0 . a ~
il . , . ~ ~ ~
. 0 ..., .....~
a ! ! ~ ~ ~
~ '
~
x ~
<(
l-
I- "
"' m ^ , ~ . ~
"' ~I . . a ^ "
. 0 .,;
::> g ! :t ~ a '"
0 ;;: ~
I- ~I ",'
,. ~
I-
Z M
::> , . a a ~
0 il . N "
, ^ a ~ ~ ~'
u ! a * ~ a ~
0: '"
~ ",'
::l ~
~
0
U M
~ . 0 , 0 '"
~ a ~ . ~ "':.
. , . ;:';- ~
a a ! 0"
" ~~
~
~
II a , , . ~
^ , , . ~
N , ",'
a ~ ~ g t ~
~ '"
~ ~'
~
I , ~ ~ '"
0 0 " ~
. , NM
N g ! ",' I/l~
2 ~
~~
I a 0 ^ 0 M
ON
g . ~ . g, C7'l,
, N
^ a ~ ' ~
:"< :::::
~~
~ . M
. ^ ~ " ~
. . . ~
. ~ ~ N. '"
t a ~
~ ~~
~ 0 , . 0 S:: .:.i
a a a
a 0 a " '"
N N
a 0 , . gr15
a a 0
a 0 a 0 " I-
, N
o
o
N _
."
~8..
;;; ~
"'"
~'"
i32
o:woo
Or-::
<( == 0
O>M
x
0:
....
....
~
ii'
::>
o
....
>
....
z
::>
o
u
'"
~
"
~
o
u
"
z
5
"
o
u
'"
'"
:;;
i
II
II
~
~
~I
~I
il
I
~
I
I
~
~
"
"
~
'"
"
"
m-
~
.
o
~-
'"
m
oo.
~
o
a
m
~
o
o
o
a
o
-
'"
~
.
.
.
~
.
,
o
!
o
o
a
,
~
.
.
a
.
,
.
o
o
o
o
"
'"
o
"-
..
"
M
~
o
o
.
.
m
a
.
'"
.
a
.
.
g
-
,
.
a
m
.
.
~
m
;\
a
.
m
.
-
~
.
,
o
g
'"
m
rl
~
,
'"
*
m
5
,
o
o
~
o
~
~
N'
'"
~
m-
~
.
g-
,
&
,
8
a
.
.
o
g
o
.
~
~
*
'"
,
'"
~
m
,
o
~.
~
~
~
m
.
m
,
m
-
!
~
g
.
I
"
..
m
~-
..
"
M
~
~~
~::i
'" -
,,0
~~
.'"
N -
~~
"
~
o
,
a
m
'"
..
~.
'"
~
~
.
a
N
N
"
~-
m
"
~
.
'"
.
g
.
~ "
~~
o
"
".
~
.
.
,
!
o "
0..
:;;' 'lt~
v:.~
o
".
~
.
'"
~
o
~- ~
~m
~ ,..,~
..
'"
"-
~
m
N
&
~- ~
~~
.~
"
N'
~
o
~.
~
~ ~
1 :'
~
..
N
~
~
a
,
~ "
~ :~
N
"
"-
~
.
.
o.
E!
.
~
fl-~
"
N
"-
~
.
.
m
a
:- ~
~ 0
.,,;
m
~
~
m
N
~
"'"
. m
" 0
~ ..-
'"
~
~
.
'"
e:
,
-
. "
"~- :c
-..,;
m
~
~
m
o
o
.
o
o
s ~
~ ::;
-....
~
I
0 ~ M ~ ~ ~ '" N
:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~"!
N w ~ '" ~- M- ~- <,D- m
." . M M M ~
NO ~ ~ ~ ~~
~o. >
- .
~o:
~'" !
o ro . '"
U_ , 0 . N
"'(J)~ " . ~
u..-.: ;;; . ;J; ..;
~ ~
<;(=0 ~
U>"
I , ~
0 . . , ..
. , . ~
;;; . . ..;
~ ~
~
. ~
~ , . 0 , . M
, i!\ . ~
. , .
;;; ~ ..-
~
. N
~ 0 . , . . M
. '. . . ..
. . '"
~ ;;( ~
~
. ~
jj . . 0 . . M
, . w . . ~
;;; ;;; ~ w ~-
~
X
'"
l-
I-
~ . 0
i< ~I ~ . 0 , . ~
:J 0 . . . M
W d ;;; d ~ ~.
0 W ~
I- :i
> "
I- 0
Z :;
:J ~ ~ ~
0 , , , , :z
u . . , .
;;; . ;;; ~-
0: ~
w ~
::;
~
0
U ~
, 0
. 0 . . " ~
. . ~ M
d , . ~.
~ ~
~
II 0 . . , . g
. . . . K'''''!.
. .
;;; ~ ~ ~ ~
~
II . , M
0 " . . . ~
m . , . . M
;;; , ;j\ ~ ~.
~
~
II . N
. . . . M
1> . . M
;;; ~ ~ ..-
~
~ ~
. 0 0 . ~
" , . , '"
;;( ~ ~ ..;
~
! 0 , 0 . ~
0 ! 0 ~
, I
.
0 ~ 0 i:?
0 0 ~
0> ~ " ., ~ ~ ., ~
" ~ ~ " ~ m
:; ~ ~ " ~ ~ ,,"l
N w > '" ,,' ., m' "'~
., 0 0 " .,"
.t ~ ~ ~
NO ~ ~ ~"
~ ~ ~
~~ >
- .
3",
0>", I ~
~ m
U_ , . , m
<<U)ro m , . "
. . . m'
0'";"":: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<(=0 ~
U>~
~ .,
0 . . N
" ~
i j; j; ~.
~
~
N ~
~I . ~ . ^ N
, m 0 0 .,
m , 00
~ ~ j; ~ ~ ~
~
m N ~
~I 0 . . .,
, ^ . . N
. 0'
:;; ~ ~ ;;i :;(
~ "
~
" ^ , ;;\
il . N m ~ ~
Er ~ ,7: a' a'l~
~ v:.~
X
"
....
.... N
'" . ~ 0 .
" ~ ~I 0 0 ~
. N . 0
:> 0 ~ ~ :a a ~'
0 ~ .,
.... ~ ~
w
> C
.... :3
2
:> " .,
~ ~ . , .
0 w . m ^ 0
u > , 0 . .,
'" w a 1 .7: :a ^ ~'
w v:.~
::;
~
0
u II
. ~ ~
. . s ~
. . a
3i a ~ N'r.O
v:.~
II , ~
. ~ ~ "
. . N
. . ,,'
:;( 3i 3i ~ ~ "
~
I m ^ . . "
~ ~
. 0 , 0 N
, . , o'
j; ;;i :;( :;; ;;i m
~
I ~
, 0 . , ~ "
. . . . . m
~ ;;i ;;i j; j; ;l'
~
~ . . . m m ~
. . 0 . . ~
N . , .,'
d 3,. j; ",. ~ ~
~
~I . , . . 0
I 0 ~ 0 0 ~
0 0
N N
. . .
0 0 0 0
0 ~ 0 0 0-
N
. " 0 N 0 ~ ~
0 ~ ~ " ~ N ~ 0
~ N ~ .. .. ~.
;; ~ "' ~- ~. ~. 'N
~~
N . , .. 0 ~ 0 " ~
~ " N ~ ~ .
." ~ .,; ~- ~. ~. - M
~~ ~M
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
"@&
~'" ~ M
GEl N , 0 " M
. . N 0 0
<<",00 " e .,;
U.,....::: ~ ! n a '"
0
<=0 ~-
u>'" ~
~
; N , 0 0 '"
, N
N , 0 "'
m a a g ~
N
~.
~
~
0 " , 0 ~
~I , N . N ~ M
. 0 " ~ 8~
~ * ill N ~ '"
....
~
~
N 0 . . " ~
~ N " 0 " , ..
" 0 0 ~.
1 * ~ * g '"
~
N'
~
'"
" . N ~
~I 0 . 0 , 0 "
" 0 0 ~-
t 0 E * * ~
, "
..;
x ~
<<
>-
>- 0 . 0 N
'" 0 ~
~ 0 e ~
0: ~I 0 0
~ ~ ~' ~' ~. o. N
::> . ~
0 2 ~, "'!.
>- " ;;; ;;; ;;; .'"
> 0 ~
>- u
Z '" ~
w
::> " > , ~
0 i5 II N . . N M
m
U ~: ~. s' , ,,-
u g N ~
0: ~, o:t~
W ;;; ;;; .~
::; ~
~
0
u '"
i . " > ~
0 0 e 0 . N
" , ,,'
* * * g R M
M
,,-
~
0
II ~ " N '"
~ g " N ~
, 0 ,,-
~ ~ ~ a a ~
~
N'
~
M
!I > ~ . , ~
N " ~ 2, ~,
~. *' * ~ ' '"
;J. ~ ~
. N-
~
~ 0 ~ ~, ~
0 0 ~
. " o. ..;
a * ..
a N "-
~
~
~ , 0 . ~
0 M
" N 0 . N ~
* &' g ~ g ::1
~
~
; 0 0 . > 0 ;,;
0 ~ 0
0 0 0 ;!
N
~ . >
0 0 ~
0 2 0 0
N
o
o
N ~
.t
NO
~~
- .
~<r
~'"
~ m
U_
<:",ro
U..-:
<:0
u>c-
x
'"
....
....
V>
"
::>
o
....
~
z
::>
o
u
"
w
::;
~
o
u
~
Z
"
o
u
~
w
::;
o
u
>
~
U
~
w
o
:l
..,
~I ~
;0 W
~~
~
o
::E
~
o
z
:l
'"
o
u
~
.,
::E
~
W
~
~
.,
Z
.
<
"
o
"
>
o!
~
>
II
;1
~I
~I
~I
(I
il
II
II
II
II
~
~I
'"
~
c-
...
M
~
"'
M
~
.
m
m
..
.;';
,
.
~
m
.
,
~
.
~
*
.
m
.
~
m
,
.
.
rt
.
~-
rt
m
,
~
,
~-
;;;
m
m
,
a
.
.
,
,
~
,
a
.
o
o
,
o
o
,
N
~
~
~.
N
N
...
M
~
.
*
.
E
o
o
5:
o
m
~
m
~
;;;
.
R
~-
rt
o
.
m
rt
m
m
m
~:
;;;
o
,
~
o
~.
'l\
.
.
*
.
!
,
o
o
.
o
o
M
~
'"
~
'"
c-
...
M
~
,
.
*
N
.
o
g
m
~
N
o
N
:fi
'l\
m
~
,
~
,
~-
rt
o
~'
;;;
.
.
~-
;;;
N
~
*
.
,
i
.
.
a
.
~
2
~
M
M
~-
~
M
N-
M
~
O~
M ~
MV>
oo~ N~
"'0
~ ~
QU'l'
M ~
~~
,
o
,
!
~
M'
N
M
N-
~
~
*
~
M
'"
M'
M
~.
N
~
o
g
'"
~ ~
m. '"
~ ;~
~M
~
,
.
.
g
o
~
.0
::(l ~
.. ~
.[;:;l.II,
M
~
.
.
.
~:
~
, N
. ~
~~
v[;:,
~
,
m
m
o
rt
N
~ :;
o. ...t
. '"
~ M
,...; N~
~M
~
m
m
~-
;;;
'"
'"
, M
~- gf
~ ~
'" 0
~M
~
,
~
M
m :fi
~- ~'
~llCi
~
,
m
,
:::-
;;;
~
0'"
~-!.
~- ~
,. .
~ ~
~
.
.
.
!
~, ~~
~g
.....
~
m
~
*
'"
i3 :g
~- ;i
~ ~}
~
.
.
a
M
~ ~
. ~
U
~ N'
~
m
I
o ..
~
.,
-~
~O
2 ~
0 i ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~
0 0 :! ~ ~ N
C; " N N ~q
N N- ~. ~- ~- -m
" mm
." m N N N N ~
~& ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~&
"'"' II
a~ . " N
<<I)", . ~
, N " ~
U..-:: ~ ~ ~ ~
<(=0
U>"'
~ , ~
. " , . ~
, ". . ~
;;; ~ ~ ~-
~
~ ~
~ . ~, . ~ N
;; . !!: ' "!.
~ ~"
~
. ~
~ ~ " , 0 ~ ~
. , . ~
:j, ~ ....' r-.~
~~
~ , 0 ~
~I 0 ~ m
. . , . ~
;; j <'I'a>
~~
X
<
l-
I- ~
~ . . .
i< II . . " 0
" , . . o "!.
. "
" >- ~ '" :;( '" .. ~
0 Z ~ m
I- w ~
~ :;
>-
Z ~
" " ~
0 ~ ~ . . ~ N . ~
" , ~ ~
U 0 " , m'
~ ;;( :j, :j, :j, "
~ N
W ~
::;
~
0
u
II ~
" , g S 0
" " . m.
::i ::i ;;( ::i .. ~
~ N
~
I N
, . ~ 0 . ~
. 0 , ~
;;; j j ;;; j ~-
~
~
II " , N "
. " m
, . . "g,f'I'!.
~ . ;;; ~ ~
~
II ~
. 0 . ~
. , ~
j ~ ~ .;
~
~ . ~
. 0 . . 0
" " * !i\ N
j ~ ~-
~
~I . 0 . . .:;
0 I ! 0
0 0 ;;
. .
0 0 ~ 0 0
0 0 0 >-
N
o
0;
N ~
."
NO
~~
~&
0>",
i32
<{",,,,
0....::
<:( == 0
u>o>
x
<{
....
....
V>
0:
::J
o
....
~
Z
::J
o
u
'"
w
::l
~
o
u
:;;
"
z
:i
o
o
z
o
u
~~
~
"
,
~
>
II
I
~
~I
~I
~I
if
m
~
II
~
~
;1
..
'"
o
~.
..
~
~
o
,
.
&
,
o
~
o
.
9:
,
~
3:
.
*
~
.
a
.
,
,
g
.
,
*
,
.
,
'!.
,
.
.
a
.
.
,
zi
&
.
o
o
o
~
~
N
O'
..
'"
~
.
.
a
.
.;:
.
.
.
f!
.
~
Ji
,
,
~
o
.
s:
,
.
.
a
~
!
.
.
o
~
^
,
~
,
.
Et
.
o
9:
,
o
o
.
o
o
,
M
'"
~
..;
~
'"
~
.
,
o
a
.
.
.
o
.
.
&
.
5
o
.
*'
.
.
*
.
^
~
.
~
a-
,
*
,
.
&
~
.
~
,
,
~
.
~
~
M
M
N
~.
~
'"
~
.
,
&
~
El
.
.
t
,
.
a
,
.
a
o
.
i
.
o
.
*
.
,
L1
.
.
a
.
.
.
&
o
o
,
.
o
o
N
~M
~..
~ .
...
:!~
","!
~..
~
.
.
&
N
N
~
~.
~
~
.
a
~
..
~
'"
~
~
M
, ~
. ~
a ~~
~
'"
~ ;~
~- ;;::
- ~
~
M
. ~
~ '"
'" f"oo~
~~
~
o
~ ~
0, \D~
~ ~
~ .
~
~
~
~ ~
~- "".
,';t~
~
~
. M
:s ~
[ri' ~
~..
~
~
~- ~
. ~.
N
~
~
M
. N
'"
m N
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
. ~
~. ~
~~
f::; ~
. N
gf gf
~~
:.J
~ <{
~ 15
-....
~
o
o
N ~
."
~g,
~&
g't
U~OO
<{VJ~
U""''O
<(:;:!;O
u>~
x
'"
....
....
"'
0:
::l
o
....
>
....
Z
::l
o
U
'"
w
::;
~
o
u
"
'"
"
~
:>
'"
"
z
::>
o
'"
"
~
:IE
oS
~:
,
~
>
I
~I
~I
~I
~I
II
~I
~
i
I
II
~
~
o
~
..
"
M
~
~
;;(
;;(
.
,
.
;;(
m
,;:
,
a
.
~
.
a
a
3:
.
.
E[
.
E<:
N
.
::(
N
.
.
ct
8
ct
a
a
a
a
"'
..
..
N'
..
~
~
,
.
ct
.
,
.
ct
N
"
.
ct
"
.
,;:
m
~
sf
N
,
a
.
11
.
~
a
~
a
.
.
a
.
~
j,
,
;;(
,
e
~
!l
~
N'
M
~
~
.
,
ct
.
a
;;(
a
~
;;(
~
.
E:
~
E{
.
,
5
a
a
3:
.
a
~
.
.
"
z:
ct
a
a
,
,
a
a
N
..
o
"'
00
..
~
~
~ ~
~ M
~ ..
o~ .:l
M~
~ ~
~~
.
~
~
:!
0'
~
~
.
.
~
~
~
~
o'
~
~
a
.
ct
~
..
s:: ..~
eM
~ ~
~
.
"
z:
~
..
~ ::'
tf",
~
.
::(
~
~ 3;
~g
~
.
N
~
m ~
';;"; "1.
~. ~
. ..
~ ~
~
*
.
.
"
~
~
, N
N ~,
a~
~
m
a
ffi
~
, ..
::: "'!.
~. ..
N N
~ ~
~
.
.
".
N ..
, :;:
~:i
~
.
"
.
j,
o
..
. "'
;i ~.
~
N
;;(
.~
. "'
. ,
N~
~ ~
~
~
ct
M
" ..
~ ~
.:i.-1
~
.
a
a
.
a
a
N
~ .:..i
~~
o
o
N w
.t:
NO
~O
"@&
'5''''
u2ro
"'U)~
, -
U~O
<(=.,--
u>~
x
'"
....
....
~
"'
:>
o
....
~
z
:>
o
u
'"
w
::;
~
o
u
~
w
>-
o
~
w
....
o
I
;~
~
~
>
!
~
~I
~I
~l
~I
il
II
~
I
~
II
;~
5
"
'"
'"
~
,.:
..
..
o'
~
~
o
o
a
!
o
.
*
:i
,.
~
,
o
,
*
,
,
.
!l
~-
;;(
.
~
~
;;(
,
~'
;;(
^
.
.
.
,
,
&
o
.
.
*
,
^
o
g
o
o
,
o
o
N
'"
o
M'
o
~
o'
~
~
,
m
a
.
o
R
o
,.
~
R
a
.
^
.
;;(
.
~-
;;(
.
.
~
;;(
o
,
.
m.
~
;;(
^
o
l
o
,
~
o
.
~
.
;\
a
"
~
o
~
..
.;
'"
~
..;
~
~
.
,
~
.
,
~
,
.
g
,
g
,
,
~'
;;(
~
~-
;;(
o
~-
;;(
.
o
~
.
a
.
!
.
*
o
,
.
*
.
o
9:
.
o
o
o
o
w
~
~
",-
;j!;
~-
~
",'"
"'w
o"l
..o~
OM
~ .
-~
~..
~~
.
.
.
;i
J,
o
o
~
~-
8
N-
~
.
ffi
N
M
W
.;
N
..
N-
~
.
^
^
!
o
. M
,M
~ C'l'
& ~,
N
~
,
*
~
..
M
~.
~...
~ ~,
~
~
~-
;;(
'"
~ :::
.-<'ai
~
;;-01
~..
~
o
^
.
2
~
. ~
~ M
"~: ~
..<D
~
.
o
..
~
;;(
'"
~ [;l
",' ...~
. '"
~ 00,
~ w
~
.
.
:>i
2\
o ;!
, ~
, .
o. M
, ~
;;'''',
~..
~
;\
o
~
M
, N
a ~
;:;-~
" N
~..;
~
,
*
M
~ O!i
. N
@ ~
~ N'
~
.
m
,
i:\
~
::i i
'<t.vi
~ ~
~N
~
.
g
o
~
, N
ON'
. :;!
~ ~-
~
o
I
~ .:..i
, ~
~ 0
a ....
o
o
N w
."
~8.
~~
'J''''
uE!oo
O:(f)~
U..--O
<(=N
u>~
x
0:
....
....
~
<<
:>
o
....
>
....
z
:>
o
u
'"
w
::;
~
o
u
;;'
>
~
W
...
.,
;
m
~
~
~I
~I
~I
il
I
II
I
~
~
~
g
'"
~.
~
~
a
a
;i
.
ti
a
,
;J;
"
,':(
^
.
,
*
~
a
.
.
.
",;
.
.
a
ti
,
a
:J:
,
.
of
~
:;(
.
.
~
.
o
a
,
^
a
a
..
M
..
.,;
..
~
~
~
~
,
a
a
.
,
~
.
a
*
.
Ei
~
l1
,
3:
a
m
~
a
.
a
~
.
.
*
.
.
of
.
o
:;(
,
o
a
,
.
a
a
~
~
'"
~.
M
~
~
m
m
~
,
.
ti
,
ti
~
ti
.
s:
~
&
.
a
;;:
.
.
B:
.
,
~'
&
^
.
,
ti
,
.
~
.
~
2
~
~
o
00
..
~
~
,
a
a
.
^
a
.
~
E:
a
.
a
&
.
.
,
~
.
.
.
&
a
.
9:
.
a
.
.;:
~
;;:
,
.
ti
.
;i
,
.
.
;J;
.
o
a
,
.
a
a
~ ~
~ ~
.. N
,.: ,..~
,"0
~ ~
~~
'"
M
..
0'
M
~
o
~
..
o'
..
~
. M
g; ~
a-.- O'l~
z::~
~ ~
~ 0
~- !;t'
~~
~ ~
m ..
....'..;
~~
..
~ m,
;;!;' ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
. ..
",,-'<It'
~~
..
. M
.0
~ ~
~~
M
. ..
. N
a'U'i
~~
~
. M
, '"
- ;'
~~
N
~~
m' 00
~ N
~
~ ;:
- ~
:::-::s'
~~
a ..
- ~
20:
-...
~ 0
2 ...
0 ~ ~ ~ " N ~ ~
" " ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ " ~ ~ N
~
N w ,,- N ,,' .; ~. ..;
.t: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NO ~ ~ ~ ~~
~O
~&
go", II
u2co 0 0 a ~
"'U)~ '" , ~
U..-a ~ s. "
4.:=M ~
u>~
II " 0 . m ~
. Ei il ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~I m m . . . N
. S. . "
~ ~ ~ ...
~
0
~ . . N ~
N ~ ~ m ~
~ . N N-
~
~
il 0 , , ~ ~
" 0 .
~ , . ~~
~ ~
x
'"
~
~
'" ~ m , m N , 3
.. ~ !I m 0 " ~ r;; .'t
::l '" 0
~ :;( :;( :f, :f, .. "
0 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
> "
~ 0
Z :r
::l ~ il ~
0 a; m . m . ~
. ~
u 0 , . m 0 <$
0: " ~ :;( ;;: ::i :;( ~
W ~
:l
~
0
u I
2 N N
m m . ~ ~
N . m " ~
::i ;;: ",'0;
~~
~ . m "
* : N ~ ~
. ;;: ....-LIi
~~
m , N
. 0 . . ~ "
. . 0 m "l
~ ~ ~ ;;: ~ N
~
~ 0
N N . N . g:
m . . . i?
. N ~ ~.
~ ~ ~ ~
~ N
. m N . ~
0 s. . ~
::i ~ ~ ..;
~
~ . , . m 0 ~
I ~ I I 0
N
I m
0 0
0 ...
N
o
o
N _
.t:
~8.
~&
'l'"'
O~o:)
"'U)~
0"-'0
<i:=V
u>~
x
~
....
V>
ii:
::>
o
....
~
z
::>
o
u
'"
w
:0
~
o
u
::
~
:'t
w
G
z
v;
;
~
"
~
~
>
~
I
~I
~
~I
~
~
~
~
II
I
~I
;
~
~
~
.,;
~
~
~
m
~
m
N
:;(
m
2i
^
.
m
,;i
~.
N
.
o
9:
,
o
o
5
,
,
a
!l
a
m
o
.
:t
m
m
.
;:[
o
2i
o
I
~
m
.;
o
N
~
.
2i
o
m
ti
o
m
.
~
"
:;(
,
^
a
,
o
~
^
.
~
o
o
o
z:
.
a
m
.
o
:;(
~
:t
m
a
,
~
~
~
m
m
~.
~
N
~
~
~
,
,
2i
o
&
N
~
,
,
^
a
.
~
m
,
&:
,
N
o
~
m
.
~
N
.
.
~
o
m
ti
,
o
a
.
I
..
N
~
'"
'"
N
~
~ffi
m~ rIS
m N
ON
m .
~~
~
,
.
^
2i
~
~
N
N'
m
~
,
E!
8
'"
m
~
^
,
~
~ g
m '"
",' ...,~
~~
,
.
~
~
, N
~ m~
~::J
~
~
&
:; ~
^ 0
600
~~
o
,
Ei
~
a g;:
m' ,.;
N ~
~~
,
m
~
~
. m
;::': O'!.
N. ~
. ..
~ ~
~
o
.
~
~
~- ~
o ~
~~
o
N
5
o :!
::il""!.
m. m
mm
~ ~
~
.
~
&
~ ro
m m
N- Ltl~
~~
,
~
a
~
~ ~~
,. '"
~ N
~
o
a
~ ;:;:
N ..
",- N~
,j;~
m
I
;:: .:.;
~ ..
-....
~ 0
~ ....
~ ~ ~ M 0 " 0
D " ~ ~ ~ ~ M
~ ~ ~ M ~ '"
;; ~' ..; M' g ~. 0;
N W M ~ 0 ~ "
0 0 M '" .. '"
oj t N' ..; N' M' M' '"
0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
"@&
go", I i 0 a:
u2co ~ N , '"
<<U)~ . N 1i
u..-'O a ^ ,. ^
<(:::: In ~ ~ ~ M
u>~ ~
~
~ , . , . '"
~ ~ g ^ 0
0 ~'
* ~ E[ a ~
N
~
~
. . . . N
~I . . N t;:; ,."
.
s: ~ 5 ri .. '"
. M
~ N
~
~
0 , . . ~ ~
~I . , ^
. 0 . .
~ a a 1 r;.;- ~
~N
~
~ ~ . ^ ~ :!
~l N .
0
~ a * ~ ",' r-.~
~ ..
X ~~
"
l-
I- ~
'" ^ . . ~
. ..
ii: ~I . ^ 0 . ~ ~~
:::J a a * ~
0 ~ ~
~I ~ .
?- M
~
~ :;
Z <t M
W
:::J ~ , . ^ . "
0 il N . . 0 ~ M
. 0 ';:;- :f
u ~ ~ ~ *
0: ~ M
~ ~..;
::; ~
~
0 ~
u
II . ~. N ~
, . 0 ~
N . ~ ..;
a . ~ ~ a ~
~
~ ..;
~
N
II ~ . , . ~
. ~ , . ~
. . N .;
~ ~ & g a ~
0
M'
~
~I ~
^ . R ~ . '"
. , . ~
0 . 0 N'
~ ~ 0 * 1?:
,:J< ~
M
~
~ '"
^ ^ M
. ~ , M
0 . ",'
a ! 0: a s. M
N
~
~I M
^ ^ . . :!;
. . . .
. ~'
11 N a ~ & M
M
~
;1 0 0 . . 0 "
i I ~
0 0 :!
~ N
^ .
0 0 0
0 ~ >-
~ '" N ~ '" 0 '"
a . ~ '" '" M M ~
" ... '" '" ~ M N
;; 0 ., ",- .,; .,; ",- ..-
N " M N '" .. 0 0
- ~ M N ... M '" ...
N " M- ..- ..- N ~. ..-
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"
~
~& > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'5'''' ~ '"
00 00 , , 0
u~o:) . m . 0 '"
<((I)~ ~ . , 00 , M-
O.-A .. R '" * N
" ~ E!. M
<(=(0 ~ N-
u>~ ~
'"
'" ~I , , ~ M
g ~ . '"
0 0 ~-
... g & R M
;;' '"
w N-
'" ~
~ ...
;;: M " , ~
. ~ , M ~
~ ~I N 0 0 M ~-
w 2 & 0" .. '"
~ ~ E!. E!. '"
" N-
Z
;;; ~
'" '"
'" . , , , M
<( ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ..
.. 00 ",'
w ~. ,. ~. & m. ...
:> 0 i5. ..
0 S\ S\ ::\ M-
:l: ~
w
~ . m M , ~
;;; . '"
m , . 00 ..
0 . ^ . M
:> ~I ~' ~- ~' s' ",-
~ 0
'"
x ~ vi vi vi vi vi ~-
<(
"" > ~
.... '"
.... w '"
on ... . . , N 8 0
0: ~ 0 , m ..
~I , m.
;j ~- ~- 00. ",-
OJ ~ N ~ '"
0 w . 0 ...
>- :of :of :of :of :of '"
.... ~I 0
~ ;: :> ~
z 0 ~ '"
OJ >- w . M " M N
>- il ~ g , m , M
0 0 M .
:l: ~ ~' ~' ~. .,;
u , '"
'" m 0 '"
'" :of :of :of :of '"
w '" ~
::; <( ~
~ ..
0 > m m ^ , . ~
u '" II 0
, m 0 , m M
^ m , ^ ^
" ~' ~ ~ ~ ~- '"
::> N
0 v: v: ~
'" ...-
" ~
..
:> M , , ~
5 II 00 0 ~
, ~ . , ffi ~
:> ::: ~. 0" ~- :;; ..
2 '"
::> D. D. vi 0, ..
z ;;; ;;; ;;; ..-
~
~
0 II ..
" M , ::\ . '"
z ~ ~ m 0
0 00 D. ~-
0 R * 0" oo. '"
U ~ :; i!. N
'" M'
>- ~
z
w ~
:> II ~ . 00 M . '"
>- 00 . . . ..
'" 00 , , . ....
<( ~ '" '" ~ 00. M
.. ~ * ~ ..
<( N-
~
N
~I M ~ m m M
, ^ 00 ~ ~
. . 0-
~ * * 1 0
..
..;
~
. 00 ~ ~ ~ 0
~ 0 '"
> ~ ~ ;:
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >-
a
a
N ~
."
~~
~~
'5''''
u!9oo
<<:<J)~
U"-'o
<.(::::r--
u>~
rl
co
"
ii'
"
'"
a.
,.
b
:;~
R
u
"
:>. z
'" a
eo
H
rC
o
'"
'"
" ,.
c.:H ~
b<
,.
H
'"
"'
>: Z cr;
~E-<(l,
E-<P:;<
"
,~ '"
[jlA;
H
r:Y.-l<
t)-l< P:;
o 4:
t--< z:
'"
~
co
'0
U
"
C1
H
..1
.1
o
U
a
rl
a
N
,
N
o
-.
ill
o
co
"
c
("~
,n
o
'"
'"
U1
H
"
r.
o
b
"-
'"
r~
"
a
"
,_1
~
"'
a1
W
'"
'"
"
~o
()
"'
'"
;>
o
z
b
U
o
,--j
m
'"
M
N
m
m
~
o
en
"'
rl
~
o
'"
'""
rl
~
o
co
m
N
~
~
o
H
m
M
'"
~
,-
N
e.
~
m
en
'"
rl
,-
'0
M
<J)
;i!
H
o
b
'"
W
<J)
C!J
"
"
H
"
"'
z
g
< ;0<
< "
'"
'"
"
H
Z
H
ZIZ"
0,"
0"
Z
o
()
'"
:i!
'"
'"
'.,
z
:'5
()
'"
o
;>
o
z
H
"
o
en
H
,-
~
'"
0'
N
~
o
M
N
~
M
N
'"
N
~.
~
'"
en
'"
ill
N
o
N
rl
~,
~
ill
~
o
~
N
m
'"
'"
~
'"
m
ill
'"
e'
'"
N
ill
H
N
~
~
'"
~
~
H
,-
~
~,
'"
H
"
"
"
H
"
"'
Z
-l< P
, r,
"
'"
"
'"
,;0<
~:i!
,
a
z
a
o
"''''
19c...
'"'"
:il
u
,
, '"
:i!
Pl
'"
'"
:z
'"
r,
en
U N
'" ill
a en
m
;> rn
o rn
:z N
~
H m
U "<l'
o N
<J)
H
"
0'
o
H
"
W
0)
H
o
,n
H
m
rl
~
o
M
H
H
en
en
M
o
'"
N
e-
M
~
rn
H
~
,-
N
N
o
M
~
H
rl
rl
N
N
~
~
C1
rl
0)
;i!
H
o
H
'"
'"
<J)
C!J
"
'"
._1
"
,.,
:z
"
;:J
< ;0<
, :i!
'"
'"
H
o
>;
,'"
"''"
"'''
H
o
"
,
. '"
'"
'"
a1
W
'"
z
"
r,
m
U en
'" ~
co rl
H
m
en
;> M
o ~
:z rn
m
~
m
H ~
U 0'.
o ~
m
M
ill
rn
m
H
en
N
H
ill
o
H
m
m
rn
'"
"
~
H
rl
~,
o
~
~
N
rl
o
H
rl
o
H
o
rl
N
o
H
N
H
~
m
'"
o
'"
o
rl
ill
'"
~
en
~
,-
'"
H
N
0)
'"
'"
H
o
H
'"
'"
Ul
C!J
"
'"
'"
c:
z
"
r,
,..
'"
>:
<
.
'"
'"
;>'"
"''''
"''''
H
Z
H
,
. "
~
'"
W
'"
z
:'5
u
'"
'"
;>
o
z
H
U
o
"
rl
,.<
N
-<
M
ill
M
rl
M
o
ill
rn
~
"'
.;
o
ill
ill
N
N
'"
~
~
rl
ill
rn
H
o
N
~
e-
N
M
rl
rn
o
en
rn
'"
,"'
H
o
rl
~
~
ill
<-
m
rn
rn
m
m
~.
Ul
H
"
H
o
H
'"
'"
Ul
C!J
"
'"
.~
"
,.,
:z
"
r,
.
.
'"
~,.,
"'''
>:
'"
>::
o
::r:
"''''
,__~ fl.,
H"
'"
o
>:
,
-l< ;z:
'"
>:
ro
'"
'"
z
'"
r,
~
() ~
W rn
a
'"
;> ~
o <-
:z
ill
H M
U ~
o
en
,--I
e,
<-
rl
'"
H
,n
rl
H
m
o
~
rl
N
,.
N
M
en
'"
'"
o
N
rn
<-
'"
N
ill
ill
'"
rl
Ul 0
'" ,.
" "'
H M
o 0
H M
'"
'"
u,
"'
"
:3
r,
z
"
'"
.
.
,.,
,.,'"
e1>:
H
z"
;;:
",
'" '"
,1'"
(!Jo<:C
Z
H
Vi
,
,'"
~
'"
!;;
;,0
r,
rn
U ~
'" M
co N
rl
M
:> M
o m
Z ~
~
H '"
U N
o ~
N
'"
'"
m
M
'"
~
M
~
m
~
m
en
o
N
H
H
H
M
H
rn
~
<-
rl
~
m
~
~
'"
rl
'"
o
0'
M
"'
Ul
e1
'"
H
o
H
'"
'"
Ul
"'
co
'"
'"
f:)
z
"
'"
,.,
'"
>:
'"
0'"
H,"
"''''
'"
01
'"
.
, ~
>:
'"
"'
'"
z
:'5
~
U ill
'" 0
co ill
W
ill
:> M
o <-
Z rl
~,
'"
H rl
U ill
o rn
."
'"
o
ill
,.
M
ill
'"
~
N
rl
H
o
~
en
<-
en
M
H
~
e"
H
~
~
N
o
rl
m
M
~
m
~
N
o
r<
'"
M
<-
m
'"
M
,
< "
;ii
~
~
en
en
'"
ill
rl
,
.
'"
"''"
"''''
'"
H
o
Ul
H
'"
H
o
I~j
'"
'"
rn
"
CO
'"
'"
c:
z
CO
"
'"
~
'"
r~
"'
z
:'5
()
'"
a
:>
o
Z
H
U
o
Ul
'"
'"
H
o
H
C
M
M
rn
o
m
d
"
w
en
"
"
'"
H
"
r,
N
M
M
~
ill
~
Z
"
r,
~
N
'"
m
ill
OH
'"
'"
<-
'0
H
M
N
~,
d
.,
.
0)'"
"'''
F-t:~
H
o
H
'"
'"
o
'0
o
~
c"
.
, '"
'"
'"
~
ill
N
M
o
N
en
'"
'"
ill
m
en
ill
<-
'"
H
z
:'5
o
ill
'"
[-
en
o
H
~
U rn
'" 0
o ~
~
<-
m
:> ill
o m
Z ~
~
en
rn
H .'
U m
o "
~
~
0
;;
N W
."
~~
~~
'J'''
u2<Xl
<<UJ~
, -
u~o
<.(::!:oo
u>~
CD '" '" CD '" 0
~ ~ "' ~ ,- 00
m CD m 0; ro 00
u, 0 UJ '" ,n '" UJ m UJ '" UJ u, m
..~ CO ~ CD -l H CD H ~ "' -l 0
<< m ~ ., '" '" c- '" '" '"
~ ~ 0' ~ N H ~ ~ <n ~ ~ ,_oj
0 0 " 0 0 0 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ [I ~ ~
01
C9 ~, 0. 0. 0. p, 0. 0.
.< 01 01 01 "' 01 01 '"
"' UJ UJ UJ UJ u, UJ UJ
C9 C9 C9 C9 C9 C9 C9
to to to to to to to
'" '" '" '" '" '" '"
;~
" m '" <n <n c- N
H H 0 H m H '0 ,~ 0 H '" H H "'
() to 0 to C- ~ '" to ~ to CD ~ to "'
C> m C> ~ C> "' C> N '0 ~
'" N '" ro ro
'" c, ~ '" <n
H
'" '" ,n ." m ~ ,n
0 Z ., Z 0 Z ~ Z ~, Z c- Z Z N
'" to '" to 0 to <n CO '" to '" to ~ '"
01 C, N C, ,- C> C> '" C> C0 C> ,~
'" m '" m m
~ ~ " "' ~
Q . ,
Co .
'" N , 0 '" '" ~ N ~
~ m . ~ N ~ m ~ ~ '" >. ~ m ~ ~ '0
:1i ~ ~ "1 ~ <n H :1i ~, H '" 0 '" >'i ~
~ Q rl . U 0 Z '" '" '" M
:;; ~ ;'l '" . rl CO CO N
M M ,n 0 '" M
H . H OJ '" () . ~
. UJ 01 0 . .
'" '" H '" H 0 ot N '" '" . '"
CO CO '" <n '" CO :2 '" m ~ '" <n 01 "' '" '" UJ '" N
H ~ Po '" 0 r~ '" Po <n " Po w H Po m '" ", -l Po 0
~ .< w u '" 0 0 '" '" w H '" '" '" '" :.c '" CO
Po ,- '" ,n '" '" ~ H <n " H 0
(5 ~ '0 ~ In '" ~ 0 N '" 0 ~
'" H W U ~ 0 H N
" 0 . w , N . '" <n rl
f" '" ~ , '" <n " '" " , '" '0 '" CO , '" '" c-
Z '" M >'1 c- ~ m >'1 CO '" '" >'1 >'i co
to '" '" co <n '" 0' '"
0 M '" rl ~ CO
() "' ~ 0 0
c, N
'"
01 '" ~ M CO '" W
H CO 0 CO ~ CO CO CO N '" w CO CO '"
H 01 ~ OJ M 01 '" 01 ~ 01 ~ 01 01 on
-l ", "' "' ~ "' "' N "' ~ "' "' 00
0 ,- co ~ N ,-
I) ~ "' co '"
~
,. co ~ ~ N 0
Z w Z ~ Z on ;'l 0 ~ N Z ~ co
'" '" '" "' '" c- c- co ~ co
'1 ~ '0 '" '1 C> W ~ ~
0 N ~ ",
,., N on 0
rl
-, co w '" "' ~
() ~ I) " I) on I) 0 I) ~ () I) m
0 '" N OJ 00 OJ <n OJ ~ 01 ~ 01 01 0
rl Q N 0 w Q Q on 0 ~ Q Q on
0 0 '" '" ~
N N ~ CO ~
,
N
0 '" '" ~ CO M 00
, :> 0 :> '" :> '" :> c- > '" > :> w
w 0 ~ 0 on 0 '" 0 ~ 0 '" 0 0 '"
0 Z c- Z co Z Z ~ Z on Z Z 'D
~ on CO ~
~ ~ N on
0
'" on ~ '" CO 00 m
" '" N '" "' '" c. [~ co '" N '" '" ~
('J I) ~ U 00 U '" I) ~. U N U I) m
'" 0 '" 0 ~ 0 0 M 0 CO 0 0 ~
0 0 N ~ ~
OJ ~ N ~
m
Toe Revenue Analysis
TDC 10 Months thru July 2010
August-lO
September-lO
Beaches/Inlets portion
Beach Park Facilities portion
TDC Budget .
10 months TDC Actual .
thru July 10 months
2010 thru July 2010 % Difference
$11,952,500 $11,609,330 0.971
Budgeted Projected
$679,900 $660,379
$417,600 $405,610
Total $12,675,320
$4,246,232
$2,091,428
Total $6,337,660
CAC August 12, 2010
VII-1-a Staff Reports
1 of 1
--
o
o
N1"
NO
~~
1ii~
'",
~2
<t:UJ
ON~
<C == 0
u>~
III
-
(.)
CIl
......
o
...
a.
CIl
(.)
r::::
III
r::::
CIl
-
o r::::
.... III
~:!!:
-
cn~
o (.)
o III
N CIl
)olD
LL :
~
~
o
Cl
CIl
-
III
()
()
o
I-
<>
~
;;;
iO
'C
~
1;
'C
C.
:>
~ F:'
~ @~
.c
0 0
~ -0
. ~ 0_
~ '" 0 M..!.
on 0 ~~
Z 0 ~..,.
0 ci ..,.-
80 '0
. "N >-~
. ~'" u. '
ii: ,....
::;; ~ ~
u UJo
"''''
UJ "-~
U ;;;
~ 0 0 0 ..,.
. 0 0 0
. ci ci ci ~
'e- o 0 0 "'
0. ~ 0 0 0 ;;
'0 . ci ci ci
a 0 ~ '" 0
. " .... N
,s
. '"
w
0
0
,50 ci
~ 0
. . 0
. "' ci
c'O
. , ~
olD ....
lD
'"
.
~
- ,
~:t::!
~'O
. c
< .
..
.
w '"
.5O
t: ~o
c-o.
lIJ .: 0
;;~;:
.
0: '"
~ 0
0 c 0
. ci
" E 0
. '0 .. '"
u: c "' 0
c ~-g ~
~ <lD ....
, ~
" ;! '"
0
u 0
. 0
'e-~ 0
0
0.1:, ci
-'0 0
. , ....
.= aJ
.!!'
0 '"
""
~ ~
" j!J m
. ~E
'e-
0. i&~
~
'"
i . '"
0
,_ 0 0
ez 0
0. ....
'0 '"
C
, ~
~
.II
c
.
E
E
o
"
:I
C
0 .
0 E
N ~ E
t 0
N. 0 "
~
U;~
0",
~2
<{(/)
, M "
~~O C
U>N . ;:0
E N "
~ '" "
"
. :=O~
.
" l.U 0."";'.-
z ~.E ~~
.. Q.~ -
U U"'I'-O
. ~-O
;;: a.. 1"-.0
(1,1 N o.
C"_
'g:;;;;~
:,;
" '"
. a;
'0
.l: on
'0 .. ~
:I 0 N
. "
~
.
W ...
ro
.E "
. .. ~
u '" N
C '0
. ,
.. "'
"'
...
. '"
0
f ~
.. il on
il <; ~
u C
" .
0
.
w
...
.E 0
g .~fr ~
..;
.!!.: a
~ e 3:
.
"'
...
0 '"
.. . a;
u E
. '0 . on
;;: C ~
0 . '" N
E]
~ "a>
, ~
u .
> ...
"
.
'2'...
a. il.
- '0
.~ ~
.2'
c5
~
~
" ~ '"
Q. .E
. ~ '"
'0 c""
.l: 'OJ a
"':::;
:,;
" N
. . M
'e~ 0
0
a. '"
'0 ~
C '"
,
~
o
~-@
oio
~~
ti~
"",
rnrn
"-
<fU)C")
~~o
U>M
o
.
.~
..-
'0 .
. 0
."
E
-
.
w
.S
. .
o '"
0'0
. "
.."
"
.
~
liE
.'l'O
o 0
" 1:.
.
w
.E
~ g'o
c .- C.
1lI.50
~E:t
.
'"
o
.. .
~~....
u: ~ ~
~~~
, .
" .
>
:l
o
.
E
E
o
"
.
.
o
z
..
o
.
;;:
..
o
.
.0'....
. .
.. '"
-'0
. ,
.E CD
...
o
o
.
'e-
o.
u
. .
'Q~
Ii.
'0
o
"
~
1!
.- rn
~.~
~ .
a..!l
>-"2
'" 0
~::;
~
_ rn
'2Q;'.!:;~
o ~g..g~
g .2 ~ ~ ~
o::gOJ "7:::iE '7
~a:t~~ci~
E Uil;'1-'- '-'
Oco colD CO
.!!!"";"oloOodC"':l
~~J;~i::
(; ""'~a..;n
>- ~~Wlt"i
a.......odl.O
()tI)-~tI)-
rn.
o
o
N
~
~
M
"'
....
'"
~
~
....
m
N.
"'
on
..
o
"'
o
m
o
N
~
.
. rn
Q. 0
llIJ:'l;:
~:tl.B
-E ~.~
~ ::;
U
'"
'"
on
o
m
on
m
....
..
"t
l!!
o
...
..
"'
....
"t
;0
...
of
..
~
M
..
of
N
"'
..
::l
....
...
..
on
..
..
..
"t
...
"'
..
..;
..
o
o
..
..
M
M
..;
..
<I)
-'
~
o
....
CAC August 12, 2010
VIIl-1 New Business
10f3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Consideration to Redirect Beach Park Facility Funds as outlined below.
OBJECTIVE: The BCC has requested that the CAC review, discuss and make a
recommendation as to whether:
1. The Beach Park Facility - TDC Fund 183 should be used to provide $1,000,000
from the Beach Park Facility fund to the Tourism Department for emergency
advertizing.
2. Whether the Beach Park Facility Fund 183 and the Museum TDC fund should be
permanently reallocated to provide for annual destination marketing. It is
anticipated that an additional $2,000,000 is required for annual destination
marketing.
3. If funds are recommended to be reallocated, what reallocation should be
considered from each of these funds?
CONSIDERATIONS: The CAC is committed to tourism as a vital industry within Collier
County. It is also supportive of identifying and securing the necessary funding to
provide an effective tourism marketing program.
The CAC also recognizes that our beaches and the visitor "beach" experience is the
single most important tourist draw to Collier County. Keeping our beaches and the
beach experience our visitors enjoy healthy and attractive to tourists should be the
single most important objective of the TDC and The CAC advisory committees.
Beach park facilities are critical to the successful beach experience and memory our
visitors take away from Collier County. To have a successful beach experience;
1. The beaches must be clean, attractive and environmentally healthy with
adequate parking access.
2. An attractive beach park facility must exist that provides water; clean, well
maintained and attractive bathrooms; a concession and the ability to provide for
personnel protection from lighting, storm and sun.
3. With these facilities/amenities, visitors generally do not spread out more that 100
yards on either side of a facility.
4. These facilities are critical to inland hoteliers and visitors that do not have direct
access to the beach.
Beach Park Facilities, Fund 183 receives approximately $2,000,000 per year to
construct, refurbish and perform major maintenance activities for beach park facilities
throughout the County. Funds normally accumulate in reserve until sufficient funds are
available to complete a significant project. Approximately $4,000,000 is currently in
reserves to fund major bathroom refurbishments and parking enhancements in the
future. A copy of the five year capital program for beach park facilities is attached.
CAC August 12. 2010
VIII-1 New Business
2 of 3
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Coastal Advisory Committee
should consider the following issues:
1. The CAC support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park
Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort.
2. That the CAC not support any reallocation of funds that would have a
detrimental effect on any existing county program or operation.
3. That the CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the
existing allocation.
4. That the CAC support a comprehensive long term program that provides for
sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is
consistent with other destinations that we are competing against.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax
fund 183.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has not been reviewed or approved by the
County Attorney's Office.
RECOMMENDATION: The following are offered for consideration:
1. The CAC support a onetime re-allocation of $1,000,000 from the Beach Park
Facilities Fund 183 to tourism to support the emergency marketing effort.
2. That the CAC not support any reallocation of funds that would have a
detrimental effect on any existing county program or operation.
3. That the CAC not support any permanent reallocation of TDC funds from the
existing allocation.
4. That the CAC support a comprehensive long term program that provides for
sufficient funding to perform year round marketing of this destination that is
consistent with other destinations that we are competing against.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
TOC Category" A "-183 FUND PROJECTIONS
EXPENSES FY 2010/11 FY 2011112 FY 201Zl13 FY 2013114 FY 2014/15 TOTALS
Project Expenses
Bluebill Restrooms, Access and Turnaround (80058) 230,000 230,000
DWSP Entrance Road and Parking Improvements (80143) 950,000 950,000
Vanderbilt Beach Pedestrian Access #3 (90045) 0
Vanderbilt Accesses 2-6 (80141) 0
Vanderbilt Beach Restroom Expansion (90046) 376,000 376,000
New Clam Pass Facility (90091) 582,660 582,660
New Clam Bay Facility Turnaround and Parking Lot rework 500,000 500,000
Tigertail Restroom & Walkovers (90093) 7,300 7,300
Parking Improvements Cocohatchee -Aqua contribution 1,000,000 1,000,000
Barefoot Back Bay Pier - Aqua Contribution 1,000,000 1,000,000
Gulf Shore Property Purchase 0 ~
Gulf Shore Property Improvements 0 0
Gulf Shore Trollys Purchase (2) 125,000 125,000 250,000
Marco Beach Bathroom & Access Improvements 100,000 900,000 1,000,000
Conner Park Shelter and Bathroom 1,000,000 1,000,000
Bathroom Rebuilds 500,000 500,000 1,000,000
Back Bay P,er and Boat Pickups to feed Barefoot Beach 750,000 750,000
Barefoot Beach Parking Improvements 150.000 150,000
Seagate Bathroom Study 50,000 950,000 1,000,000
Suh-Total 838,300 3,257,660 2,950,000 2,250,000 500,000 9,795,960
Administration Fees
1. Tax Collector 1 Misc. 53,800 53,600 53,600 53,600 53,600 268,200
2. Parking Garage Financing/Debt 0 0 0 0 0 ~
3. Redirection of$lM for year round advertizing 1,000,000 1,000,000
Sub-Total 1,053,800 53,600 53,600 53,600 53,600 1,268,200
TOTAL EXPENSES 1,892,100 3,311,260 3,003,600 2,303,600 553,600 11,064,160
REVENUE FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 TOTALS
Tourist Taxes - Gross (113 Category A) 2,000,000 2,145,000 2,145,000 2,145,000 2,145,000 10,580,000
Revenue Reserve. 58ft. (100,000) (107,300) (107,300) (107,300) (107,300) (529,200)
Category D (Piers) Reserve
Capital Financing 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reimbursement - 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 2,000,000
Carryforward Reserves in FY09/10 3,150,800
194/4th cent impact - Total to 195 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUE 5,050,800 4,037,700 2,037,700 2,037,700 2,037,700 15,201,600
REVENUE LESS EXPENSES 3,158,700 726,440 -965,900 -265,900 1,484,100 4,137,440
Carryforward Revenue 0 3,158,700 3,885,140 2,919,240 2,653,340 4,137,440
Fund Balance 3,158,700 3,885,140 2,919,240 2,653,340 4,137,440 8,274,880
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-1 New Business
30f3
~ ~
g ~
......n
~. rD
= ><
=~
rD ~
Q..o
~ ~
~ Q..
~ r/)
I rD
a ~
= ~
= ~
Q..~
Q..~
rD ......
r/) rD
...... ~
s. ~
~ ......
...... ~ .
~. <
o rD
= r/)
a s.
~=
~~
............
~. 0
= r/)
~ =
~
~
o
~
......
· :t = 8 ~ ~ ~
~=t~~a~.~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 0 a ~
1"\ ~ , 11II 0 0-' ~ ~. 0
=~::;~ =~ ~=
= = rD ...... ...... ~. ~ =
~ I-j Q..O rD = S Q..
~ = =............
=:;. 0 ~ ~ 0 ,... ~ 0......
~:= 0 Vi. ~ l:; ,,-
0\ jooO. a a = F ~ s.
!=l ~ t::= jooO · S C/j r.l C/j
5~ rD~ =~ ~a
:= ,.;. ~ ~ ~. ~ ; a
;'~::r~ ~~ ~ ~
(I) s ~ ~ ~ S. ~ *"
~s~ ~~e-a.
~ =~ o~=rD=
~ ~ "" ~. ~ ~
0\ ~. ...... ~ rD rD ~
VI ~e:a"1 ~=
s. a g. ~ g" < ~
= ~ = ...... r/) ~. ~
,11II ~. r/) ~
rD a ~ ~ = ~. 0
~ ~fA ~ ~ 0 a
'-l ~ I......l ,... r" ~ 0
;. rD r- ~ r6 r/) ......
~. ~ = ~ r/) ~.
o ,11II ~. r/) ", 0
I-j ~ ~.,., =
~ = =
r/) 0 Q.. tii ·
=
V"
-.
r+
c:
OJ
r+
-.
o
::J
)>
::J
OJ
<
f.n
-.
f.n
. . . .. .
< ~ ~
1-'. to.; =
~- Q =-
,..p = ~
Q Q =
to.; ,..p ~
n 1-'- rD
rD Q Q.
a ~ ~
rD I-IIl I-' _
I-J ~ =
n ~ ,..p
Q = rD
Q ... ,:;
to.; .~ ~
Q. I-'.~
1-'- ~ to.;
= = 1-'-
~ fit =
g oo~
to.; N ~
~~=
Q 0 Q.
t;I'J 0 ~
~- 0 =
0- =
~ =
rD
to.;
>
~
rD
I-J
,..p
1-'.
t;I'J
1-'.
=
~
~
=
Q.
~~~&:
~o-z~
= ~. rD :t.
~ ,..p ~ Q
rD rD =
Q.rD o<~
to.; = I-J I-IIl
rD =- ~ ~
t;I'J ~ n ,.......
re = 1-'- a:
to.; ~ r-t ...
~ rD "'< t;I'J
=- = ~ V3
.. rD ~ ~
fit = Q.Q
N ,..p 1-'. =
~ ~ ~ t;I'J
Oflt~~
o VI < t;I'J
o 0 rD =-
..... = 1-'-
o ,..p ~
o I-' - t;I'J
0="
~ fit
rD N
o-~
2 g ~
~ 0 ~
o
o
..
fit
N
VI
.....
o
o
o
~
'Jj
rD
'Jj
o
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
~
,...;.
rD
~
fA
t-l
.
o
~
~.
~
~
~.
o
=
~.
=
~
~
t-l
o
. . . .
a: n a: ~
rD ~ ~ rD ~
Q. = 1-'-
I-J t;I'J
1-'. ~ ~ =
~
. . ~ rD I-J
~ 1-'. ~ Z ,..p rD =
~ t;I'J
~ 0 . . ,..p
= rD to.; ,...;.
0 ~ = ~ ~ rD
,..p
~ 1-'. rD 0< rD ~
= = = I-IIl
rD
Q. 1-'. ~ I-J I-J Z
= ,..p ~
~ ~ 1-'. ........... ~
~ .. 0 z 0
0- = ~
'---4 rD = 0 ~
I-IIl ~ ~ ~
rD I-IIl t;I'J ,...;.
,..p = 1-'- '---4 rD rE t:r'
rD = = rD Q.
I-IIl ~ ,..p I-J ~ ~ rD
~ ~ rD t;I'J
I-J rD ~ 1-'. ~
1-'. ~ = ~ = ~ =
t;I'J
1-'- rD n ~ ~
0 ,... ,..p
=- ~
= I rD =- 1-'. ~
..... ~ 1-'. ~
0 a: ~ = .
~ 'J'j
= ~ 0 ~
I-IIl I-J t;I'J 0 .
1-'- =
= ~ ~ n
=- I-J
rD rD =
..... ~ Q. ~
rD ~
I ,... ~ a
= =-
N =r
~ 0 1-'.
I-IIl ~
1-'- ~ ~
I-IIl 0
..... Q. ~
~ rD
I-J I-IIl ~.
1-'- ~ ~
= =- =
,..p 1-'-
~
~
=
,...;.
rD
~
Z
o
~
,...;.
t:r'
~rD
~~
~. =
~. ~
o .
~ 'J'j
.
n
~
a
~
~
~.
~
=
~
=
,...;.
rD
~
Z
o
~
,...;.
~t:r'
~_ rD
~ ~
r-t =
~
.
'J'j
.
n
~
a
~
~
~.
~
=
RO C/l *
nO~
o ~ ><
- (j (j
:=:' (t) 0
(t) .. _
~~rr
n ..... (j
o rr~.
t:: en 0
=' ~ ='
~ (t) ~
':""3 0.. (t)
III ..... "'d
>< III 0
nC")::+
o ~ (t)
_00..
rr t:: .....
(j '3=' ='
M
O~~
~ ::r (t)
III 0""
en ~
(t) t::
<Ill
0'1
~~
o ~
t:: ~
M N
::rO
~ 0
en\{)
M"-
~N
_0
o ....
~ 0
..... -...
o..~
III (t)
~ "'d
~r6
en en
(t) (t)
III a
~ .....
(j ='
::rcrq
0....
III ~
5!~
C/lt::
(t) III
~ ::+
..... (t)
(j ~
(t) '-'
en
V':I
(JI
Ql r... 0'1
w......w I'~
h.J n r.....:J [ &.J h.J u:-..
:t:. -;.., :t:. t&.J ;..... h
~IO...:JWI'"""U"1~
En 1!""'lIt""':l ooE.) t....
.u::..
U"I
...
I ·
.......
......,
...
~
V1
""""""
..J:a
0;:.
y-,
.0
I'.JI
a
-j.:L
..n
IJ'1
....
........
I!""'lI
W
U"I
'-1
r....
,
U"I
t"'J-.
f.-:I
...-fIi-
..p..
[&.J
w
f...J
~
"'"
"1.01
..J:a
I.J.J
r"-' t... f'\eJ
..p.. a ~ ce w
-a. -i...., ..~ -..~ -a.
OJ..o..:lO.OO
oat'.,,) 0 ..,f:L
".", 'J"
c:= UI
0, ~
S. 'S
+ +
." (.0,) ~
c:.t'1 c::.J t.:I
~ i- w
S. 'S S.
I I
~
1'"....
...
Y"1
..n
ILl
~
~.
=
,...;.
rD
~ ~
~ Z
~
~ 0
~ ~
~ ,...;.
~ t:r'
~ rD
3 ~
~ =
~
n ~
~
~ .
~ 'J'j
0.. .
I-' -
n n
~
r-t ~
0 a
~
r.J"J
~
~
~.
~
=
+
t-..)
c::.J
::0
i- fD
C/.l
o
t::
~
(j
(t)
~
en
(t)
III
~
(j
::r
o
III
M
III
C/.l
(t)
~
-<
.....
(j
(t)
en
-
='
(j
RO
-
S
"'d
-
III
='
~
*
~
\0
...
00
~
00
...
~
..
...
*
\0
UI
!IJ
UI
\0
W
*
W
...
.
...
~
*
~
.P
g
JII
UI
~
~
*
\0
UI
!IJ
UI
\0
W
*
~
o
.
00
'-I
*
W
...
~
'-I
~
~
UI
*
~
en
...~
en
00
00
*
...
..
.
o
\0
*
!1'
UI
'-I
...
...
~
en
UI
*
~
00
...
...
'-I
~
UI
*
~
W
.
W
W
*
\0
...
~
...
...
o
'-I
'-I
*
..
o
Y'
...
00
o
*
~
W
.
G\
...
3:
II
..
;:
(I)
m...
i~
:1-
a.<
"'0_-
2' !e,
.,t't'
mO
..,
;n
<DI~
II :I -I
t't' i ::I
:I _, i
tDO"
:1::1
t't'
c
0"
=a
~:I~
....0....
:I,.......
< _, V
tDOtD
.::1"
&r!!.
a.
:E)>
-. c.
~ <
itD
-I ...
n ,...
OJ -.
3 ~.
-c::s
!.OQ
OQ
~~
OJ
...
OQ
tD
,...
s:
OJ
...
~
tD
,...
~
o
-
n ~
~ ('D
~ QJ
o 0
3 ~
~. ('D
N ~
('D V'J
0-
~
~.
r-t'
r-t'
('D
~
~
QJ
~
~
~
~QJuu~
IwJ ~ ~. ~
QJ ~ ~ ceo rD
~ ~ V'J r-t' ~
~ ~ 0 !:lJ 0
~. 0 ~ ~ ~
V'J ~ r"- Cf) ~
('D ~ ..., .J ~ .
~t~ ~!
~. ~ ('D ~ =
CIl 0-; 'Tj a
~ ~ 5 ~
i:j i:j () )oj
~ .....,::
~.
0-
('D
i I
fl
~.i
:~,
~.l
~ ..J;1
r i
: ~
, I
.
~
=
I
'Jj
,...;.
~
,...;.
rD
'J'j
=
~a
~ a
~ rD
~ ~
n
~
a
) w~
~ >-i "t)
; as.. [
) ~
" 0..
~~
~ -<
,..p t;I'J
=-~
~ 0
,..p ,..p
~ I...
~ :...
· ... t;I'J
... ,..p
1-'-
I-IIl
I-IIl
~
I-IIl
rD
~
I-J
~
=
Q.
Z
~
~
I-J
rD
~
~
t;I'J
,..p
rD
to.;
t;I'J
t;I'J
~
1-'-
,..p
~-
I-IIl
I-IIl
= ~
rD ~
t;I'J rD
~ =
~ C
rD~
..... ~
~~
1-'- =
=:-t;I'J
'III ,..p
t;I'J rD
:t- Q.
1-IIl,..;.
l-IIlo
~ to.;
o rD
~ ~
rD rD
~ ~
1-'- ,..;.
= 0
~ =.:
t;I'J I
= ~
= rD
:3 ~
rD ~
to.; I-J
~ ~
I-IIl I-' -
= t;I'J
rD rD
~
to.;
o
=
1-'-
t;I'J
rD
.
~
=
I
'Jj
,...;.
~
rD
~
~
z
o
o
~.
~
~
~
('lIjz
) <: ~
~n"O
".~ -
~1f~ I
~ ~~
· ~~ t
~
=
I
'Jj
,...;.
~
,...;.
rD
'J'j
=
~a
~ a
~ rD
~ ~
n
~
a
~
~
~.
~
~z
>> (I) $l.\
~ ""t "0
; os.. ~
!..
il~ f
;~~i
~
. =
N ~ I
C/.l 0 'Jj
0 w w ~ ~ 0'1 0'1 0') 0 rD ,...;.
t:: 0 0'1 0 0'1 0 0'1 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \0 ~ ~
(j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... ~
~ t;I'J ,...;.
1-'- t;I'J rD
en =
ro 1-'-
III ~ ,..p
~ 'J'j
(j :t> rD ~
::r ""0 ,..p
t:l ;:0 ~ 1-'- ~
III r ~ 0
M = = ~
III
C/.l ~.
(t) ~ ~
~ =
..... ~ 0
(j 1-'-
(t) = ~
en ~
- =
=' s: ~ ...............
(j
:t> I-IIl I-IIl 'J'j
-< ~ 0
= I-J =
= 1-'.
~ Q. a
=r ~
. ~ a
0
c.... =
C
Z t;I'J rD
m ~-
t;I'J ~
,..p
rD n
=
,..p
I I ~ ~
=- a
N N
0 0 ~-
...lo. 0 ~
0 co ~
rD ~ t'1'jz
to.;
~ ~. ~~
~ ca-
~~
rD = :(1
to.;
w.-.-....,.~. ';1}';.;;;i-X';; ~l ~
o i:l..
f
:r
:I
g,
z
t
(II
..
C'l
i!-
I
~
!L
~ ::t
Q 0
o ~.
=- ,;.,t-;
r ~
!t !r
~ fl
i ~
i 3 :
i !I:.Z
~ :t ~.
i ::::l :
Q. \0 "
:z V)
~t f
~t - ."..".
0::<'. :::J
. <0
f
'^
i
,....
\l-;i
~
I
~
rc
~
VJ
~
rc
(j
..,. .
~
I--'
VJ
no
~~
rc VJ
~ 0
c:L~
~ Cf)
""1 C
~ S
c:LS
nrc
o ""1
e tTj
a ~
c:L~
o f""t
~
~
g~
· '" =:r
... ..,..
... (j
~. =:r
..,. .
~ CJ
rc rc
""1 f""t
~ ~
~. ~
~~
~
""1
rc
~
'Jj
~
~
~
rD
~
~
~,...;.
~::t
gJrD
~~
rD
n
~
a
~
~
~.
~
=
~z
:In!>>
:l""i~
If
o ({ i
C/.l
o
t::
~
(j
(t)
. .
~
......
-
(t)
en
~
(t)
0..
......
III
C")
~
o
t::
'"0
.
~
~
.~
t;I'J
~ ~
~ ~
t:=~
o rD
o
~~
z~
~ rot
~::c
o-rD
= to.;
,-t rD ...
,.,p ...
o t;I'J
=~
rD
~ o.
t;I'J ~
,.,pQ.
=-rD
rD ~
,.,p I-IIl
=rt;I'J
~- ~
a~
=-~
1-'-
~
rD
t;I'J
,-t
~
I-IIl
1-'-
~
~
~
to.;
=
.
o~
~ ~.
1-'- ,.,p
= 1-'-
~ 0
to.; =
rD ,-t
~ 0
~ ~
Q.~
N ~
We Q.
~ ~-
e t;I'J
o rD
~ n
to.; 0
N ~
o ~
o ·
\0 8
~=
'=
= ~
rD 0
~ =
,... ,.,p
,.,p=-
o rD
~~
~.
t;I'J a:
,.,p~
\0,... I-J
::rt;I'J
'-" ...........
Z
~
~
I-IIl
rD
t;I'J
~
~.
=
~z
n~
~-
h..~
~
'l~ f
~...~.. 8 ...
) ~ I
Q.. I
!
.
.
.
.
~o~o>~.
"..- ~~~
O=~~e:
= I-' - ,....
~ ::!- Io'd :t- 1-'-
a,~~gg
fA ,.... = ~ ~
N~~~~
? r6 = ~ ~
0\ < Io'd OQ ~
Io1l t'J 00 Vi g
8" ::; w.. a <:
I-i = ~ 1-'- 1-'-
t"D.... ~~
~ 1-'- Io'd =: ~-
~ = t"D 0 0
~~~=~
t:r r6 ~ 1-'- ~
~ ~ ~ = g
a.~~e:~
I-'" ~ ,.... r6 t"D
~fA~~ ~
I-i 0\ a ,.... I-' _
=- Jj 1-'- t"D =
~.... ,.... ~ ~
~ 0\ =r Io'd :t-
,.., N .......J t"D 0
rI'J ~ ~= =
~c~~
Q.. ~ 16 ~-
"""- = ~ =
=~~r6
~=~~
~ =.... t"D
rI'J ~ ~
:t- 0 rs
=n=-
~ 0 ~
""" - I-'" t"D
o I-'" Io'd
= ~ ~
= :t-,....
~ 0
*~
~ '-'
f""'Io
"""-
=
~
.
.~
tD
Q3 In
,.... C
~ -
Io!'j~,...
~ < fA
o 1-'- VI
~ ~- 0
I-' - ,....
~ ~ ....
~ :t-
:S- 0 -4A-
~. = ~
,.... 1-'-
~ = .,
:t- ~ ~
o ~ ::
= ~ =
= ~ 0
~ ~ ::s
?O VlQ
VlQ ~ ....
~ 0 ::s
~ <
~ tD
N In
o ,...
~ 3
tD
::::J
,...
~~
~O
~~
~ ~
~rD
3~
~ ::4-
n
~ N
So
o..t-l
1-'- 0
n
~n
o ~
E..a
-. ? ~
I ~.
~~
~ =
~ 'Jj
::s
~
AI
...
=--
tD
,...
-.
::::J
~
..
~. z
; tt> Q)
11 ""l"E!..
} qg. t'b
J~.~...... '" n f ~
>> .~
Q.
~~.. ~~ . o~~~~~
~ ~ ~ "C O. 0" e. ~ ~ ~ ::I ~ S. 0"
rD Oa = 0 ~ ~ I-'" ~- to.; = rD = t;I'J ~
"1 ~ =::,.,p ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Q. ~ ~
,.. ~ _ I-' _,.,p ~,.. ,.,p #fII. #fII. ,.,p
to.; ~ rD 'J rD rD ~ ~ 1-'-' II' 0' II' rD
I ~ = ~ t;I'J ~ I-'" O,.,p 0,.-..
a rD ~;. ~ rD ~ = =r to.; I-J ~ ~
= = 0'"' ~ ~ Q.&rD t;I'J rD 0 rD =~
= Q. ~ 0 = 0 g ~ 1-'- ~ ~ ~ = 0
Q.~ ~ ~ = ~ = = I-J = Q.~
Q. = ~ : Q. 0- e S- n 0 ~ 1-'. ~ 0-
rD 1-'. rD ~ ~ = ~ Q ~ = rD = ~ =
t;I'J ~ ~. e w ~ rD rD = Q. ~ ~
:t- to.; rIJ ~_ ~ 0 rD QJ ~ ,.,p ~ rD ~ 0
~ ~ ~ s; ~~ g.~ 0 ~ ~ I"t- ~ ~
,.,p t;I'J ~ 0 I-J 9 ~ Q.. ~ ,.,p ; r ~ =-
0- rD fit = 0 =:; 0 QJ nOrD ~ rD
~ =- VI ~ = 1-'- ~ e 1 = = ~ ~ co
~ ~ e 0- rD ~ ~ 0 ~ ~- = ~ ~ rD
~ go == ~ ~ ~ ;g ~~ ~ g ~ ~
I-J rD ~- ~ ~ >< e ~ ,.,p;i = sr =-
~,.,p g o. I-J ~ = ~ ~ ~ =,.,p ~ ~
~o = ~rIJ~rD~,.,p~~=
1-'- ~ ~ ~ = ~::r to.; I-IIl t;I'J = = Q.
= 1-'- ~ rD Q. ~ rD ~ 0" 0 I-J 1--1
~~~~ t;I'J~~:t.~ ~...=
1T ~ " 1 rIJ rD ~ ~ . \wi I-IIl
Q.~~ =--~~~ ,.,pOrD
rD = QJ I-IIl ~ ~ ~ rD t;I'J ,.,p
< ~ ~ g ~. rD Q. Q. ~ a:
~ ~ g ~ e- ~,.,p g. ~
oa~ ~ =rDO =
~ .......::r "'" . ~ = n = ~
~ rD rD ~ ~t;I'J 0 ~
~ ~ rIJ ,.,p ~ rD9 = rD
rD f1rD 0 = t;I'J~ 1 =
e ~ co ~ = 8 rD
I"t- ~ ~ 0'" ~ = ::I
~ ~ ~ rD ~ = ,.,p
~ ~ =- ~~ r6
o rD ~ t;I'J t;I'J
rIJ " 1 rD rD
VI ,.. ~ to.;
~ to.; ~ <
Q ~ = rD
-I
C
n
c
-.
f.n
n
c:
f.n
f.n
-.
o
::J
~
-c
-.
n
f.n
g po. s S'~ ~ ~~ ~.~ (il ~ ~!lJ '!.J ~
~ ~ 0 =~ eo ~O~O & a= ~ ~ ~ n a=-t
:! ~ = ~~ ~ ro ro ~ ~ M' ~ ~.."
ro e rp S.~: ~ p. p. ~o- ro 0 ~ ~ 0 = ~
0- ~ f""l"CIQ f""l" =- ro n ~ ...en ~ ~ r.I'J ~ ~ ~
1-'0 ~- =- ~~. 0- ~ ~ ~ ~ en f""l" "-! ~ OJ
:! = =:;....... 0 ~ M' ~ "'0 r6 ~ n fA a ~ ~ ....
&5r ~oe-~ ~ ~ ~ = V1 ~?~ ~ ~ "-'-0
roCIQ 0 ~ r.I'J ~ M' ~ 0 ~~V1 =- ~"'<
"'0 S' ~~ =-~ ~~~ = ~~ ~~ ~ ~ -t
9... = ;. o. ~ ~ : 1-'0 ~ ~- ~ a ~ r6 ~ = <
I-' 0 ...... ~. ro:! r.I'J I-' o~ \J r.I'J =
~ ~ ~ = O"$: ~"'O ~=- =::r~ ~ =)>
eT 3 d =- I'D ;;. S' SJ!!; ~ 8 ~ re ~ ~-
~~ n~ S'r.I'J ~ S M' = :! ro ~ ~ 0"'-
o '< r') = = ~ ~ ..... ~... g..g & ~ I:: 0
~ U "'I 0" ~ = I-'o:! ~ ~ 1-'0 ro::r r~ n
(t) loW ~ rD ~ o-~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .......
~ r; ~~...... ro ~ 0 ~ ~ :!O(t) = ~ OJ
r6~-9:~s.2"'~.g~ O~~eT l:l r+
0- ~ = ~ S. s.. "'0 ro ~ ~::r ~ ~ 0::::= 0--
O~ ~ r.I'J = fflItt.. en ro M' r.I'J ro ,-... n
___ f""l""""" ~ 1-'0 en en ro ~ n ~
~ ~ rD ~ 0" so a 0 ::r ~ >< "'0 ~ Q::S
...- ... ~ < ~ I-' o:! ~ ~ "'0 a f"I;o
~o r6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 = en ~ 8" ~ o. '"
~ < == ~ Q. u SO;:;u s.:o-~"'- = -c
...- ~ ""'" CIQ ""'" l- ~ ~ ro ro I-' 0 a ~ 0
ro = = ~ ~ 0,-...;0 ~ 0 M' tt ~
~ =~o~ ~~an ~~o- ~ 0
~ ~ ...... ~ ~ '-' en n ro ~o 1-'0 ~..-
~ ~"'<fl!rr.I'J 0 o~o~a oa:! =--
M' ~. N r.I'J ~ 0 ~ M' Q.. n
~ =~~ z~~ ~~a::r ~ <
"'0 ~~~ o~SJ = ro Q
"'0 =~o ~~tt oou =
:=:' ~ rD~ a 0 0- ~ ~~ Q.. --~--
g = ~ ~ eT e;..... ~;!t &:- :3 0
1-'0 0 ~ ~ ro I-'o:! ~ 0 ro Q '--
o =~ ~~M' M'~M' .... N
~ =:-; N atoJ::r 0 ~ ~ =.
en f""l" ~ 0 ro ~ ':-' 1-'. f"I;. U1
~ ~=- 03(t)u &~& ~ '--
~ ~. ... 0 a ~ ro ~ fA Q 0
= r.I'J ~ ~ &~ = U1
~ ro ro ~ ~............
...... M' ~ ~
I-' 0
:!
'\ "
\
0:1\
tD\
~\
:::s:- \\
20
0:1
tD
OJ
n
:::s:-
-c
OJ
-t
~
.."
OJ
n
--
-
-.
,...
--
tD
'"
o:J
(1)
OJ
n
:r
-c
OJ
...
~
."
OJ
n
jooO . . . >.t:... ~ t::= -
=. =t!j t!j t!j e- \oN rD ~"'W 0
_ :=:=_~=C/jO =
~ ::r ::r ::r ~. 0 0 rD ~
5.~ =~ = ~ o~. ~ = ~ ~ ~ rD
:= N "1 0 0 rD ""<
~ ~ ~ n = 0 ~. = = ~ re
5. ~ ~ 2.. ~ ~::r rD jooO. "1
(I) (I) ~ ~!:l N C/j = ~.
~"d "d ~ ~ 5" ~ s 0 ~ g
~ ~ ~. ~ 0 C/j ~ 0 = ~. fD
n ,.;. := ,.;. = rD ~ ~. rD 0 C/j
:;c: ~ a ~~~ ~ = r-t'
~ ~ := ~ ~. = rD rD rD = ~
~g ~(I) 0 ""~~ = ~=
~ j;l /1) = - '''' !:l ~ ~
~ 0 (I) n C/j "1 ~ ~. ~ I r-t'
~ ,.;. a 0 ~ S' ~ rD = rD 0
O. o' j;l ~ g. C/j = ~ t:'. ~ -.
=:::= a _ -~" ~ ~ = ;i
e./1) /1)..0= ~ ~~~ ~~ 0
/1)~~ C/j ~oo ~ t'D
(l)cr~ ~ ~ ~_!:l ~ ==
::a. ~ft =: ~ ~ ~ ::r=:
(I) /1) ~ - ~. t::= 0 ~ =-
,.;. ~ ~ ~ = rD _. = 0 ·
o e. ~ C/j "1 ~ rD r.l = 0
(I) (I) -< C/j rD r.l r.l t'D
=jooO =' /1)~' ~::r ~ !:l ~
"d ~ C/j = C/j ~ 0 1:J
"d Gel e. rt "1 S ~ "1 r+
o ~. = 'Tj ~ -.
::a. ~ ~ ~ 0
o ~ ...
= N .J
......
-.
r+
-.
(1)
f.n
. .~..~...~
II"." ~.... ~*'~t'I'j= ~t=~'"1
~::!::!1~::!::![~~:a~5 ~ ~ g.
'9 ~ 0 ......... ~ 0 Q. ~ ~ .-..I""" ... ~ ~ n
~ 0 \0 rI} t 0 \0 = ~. 0'" ~ ~. =' ~ :.; Q
'11"1'0 no ~0 rI}::::O ~~~O"':..=
g ~ ~ 9 1"1' ~ ~ ~ :t. ~ rr t:= e ~ ~ rD.
~t8J 5 at ~ rD ~ Q.~ rD ~ -:-' Q '"1
s:: S ... c. ~ sort' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
~ ~ ~~~ rD rD =-~=-(JQ =-rI}~
~ 0 '"1 ~ 0 rI} < ~ ~ 0 rD !D 1-'.
~ =: rD ~ 0'\ '"1 rD ~ .~ 0 '"1 rI} Q
~ I~ 0'" ~ v-. rD = ~ ~ =' ~. 0 =
_ ~ ~ 0 ~ =~. *' ~ =' ~ ~
ij- V1 rD 1"1' 0 =' rD 0 = Q.......- I-'
ID 8 ~ = ~~ ~g g""t:j
~ =' ~ rD Q e: g '"1 = ~
~ ......~ =~ ~ rD ~
~ ~.~ rI} rD ~
(I) O"'~ ~ ~ ='
= rD ......
e. = rI}
o ro+
=' en
rI}
"
OJ
~
"
-n
OJ
n
-.
-.
r+
-.
tD
f.n
C:J
tD
::J
tD
--h
-.
r+
f.n
~~~~
e: ~ ~ n
...... ~ . 0
o' r.l e ~
= ::c e ~.
~ rD rD r.l
~ ~ I-t =
'Tj "1 ~ C/j
,... ~. Q.. r/)
~ = ~ ~.
= ~ ~ 0
~ C/j 1-" =
r/) 0 0 ~
~ = ~ =
~ ...... Q..
~ fD 0 ~
~ < rD
~ 1-" t::= r.l
rD C/j nO
~ rD n e
Q.. ~. ~
$ 0 = ~
z a ~ ~
o 1-" ~ ~
<: = ~ ~
~ ~ rD ......
S ~ e o'
0'" rD 0'" =
rD 0 rD C/j
~ ~ ~
~ ~
o
~
~.
~
-4
::r
tD
Z
tD
><
r+
<<.n
r+
tD
-c
f.n
t:J
c:
tD
f.n
r+
-.
o
::J
f.n
RO
c
-.
f.n
n
c:
f.n
f.n
-.
o
::J
\1
> > > ~. ~ ~ ~
~~~~~ ~rD
Q.. Q.. Q.. , .., I-' ~ ~
~. ~. ~. ~ rD ~ =
...... ...... ...... = Iooool ~ " ,
~. ~.~. ~' .., ,.,
o 0 0 ~...... e. =
===~rD=rD
~ ~ ~ ~r/)~=
---~l?I2P~
l?l?l?~=~l?
= 6.6.rD~"1=
~ r/) r/) e. r/) 0 e:
.....~=O~==
~~O~~O~
~ ~ ~ ~ e. r/)
e ~~ 8:gg.
~ ft 0 ~. e
~ ~ ~ e. O'
...... = r/) 0 =
~. Q.. = =
= ~ ~ ~ S
~ a ~ ~ ~
~ ...... ~ Q.. rD
~ = ~ < ~
~ ~ 1-'=. ~ ~
...... ' .., fWIt.. ~ ~
r/) ~ ,,-. ~. 0
~ r/),...
o ~. ~
~ = =
~ ~ Q..
o ~
...... ~
~. ~
o ~
=
U1
,......
::r
-c
ro
.,
n
ro
::J
,......
o
-h
c;i
C
.,
-.
V)
,......
~
x
~
Vl == ;:r ~ z rdr
O ~. "lOrD =- ~
~ ,.. rJj ~ ~.~.
= """ ,.... ,.... ~ ~ ,....
~ = =- 0 ~ ~ ~.
~~!D?0~0~
.. ~ 1-;...,....
Zo~~~~=-
CJ~~ ~~~
~ ~- rr
~. rJj ~.
o ... a
~ ~ ~
~z 0
t:= rJj
= rD
r./'J ,....
~. =-
~ rD
r./'J =-
r./'J ~ _
=;3 ~
~ rD
rD rJj
~ ,....
,....
o
,....
~
~
,....
~
><
rD
rJj
o
=
,....
I-;
~
rD
~
rD
I-;
rJj
~
I-;
rD
>
r./'J
r./'J
o
~
~
Z
t:=
~
---
~
o
=
=
Q.
CJ
~
~.
o
=
...
N
o
~
o
- -
c
.
=~~~~CJQ~
OrDO~orD~
= ,.... I-; ,.... I-; = ~ .
o I-; =- ,.... rD ::t.
~ s- ~ ~ ~ ;i rD
= ,.... """ ~ ~ ~rJj
=;... Q.. rD = rJj ~
... ~...o ~ Q.. ~ =-
I-poI ~ '- ~ rD rD
=== ~ Z Q.. rJj I-;
~ ~ ,.... rD
~ ~ ~ ,....
~rD ><:1
, III'" rD'"
~ ~rJj~
::J~~rD
L . Q..~
Q.. ~.
~-=
rJj~
Q=
~.I-;
a,....
~- =-
=rD
~~
""'0
~~
,....rJj
1-;"'"
~s
rD"'"
~~
~
,....,....
~~
~ ><
rJjc:r
... =
~I-;
;6Q..
.. rD
=
~-
=
o
C
-c
;I
)(
::tJ
OJ
r+
tD
tn
OJ
-c
tD
:t>
3
o
::J
(JQ
r-
o
=e
tD
tn
r+
~n'"
rc 0 ~
~ = ~
e- a s:
~ ~ ~
s.SJ~
~
~ e: ~
re = \J'j
ifili. ~ ......
f..l = ~
t:r ~ ......
~ rD =
~ \0 ......
~ ~ rD
~ I ~
.... 0\ ~
~J 9 \.[1
~ 0
~. ~ ~
= r/) 0
:!. ~ ~
rc =
r/) rD
~ =
o Q..
= rD
~ Q..
~
~
o
...........
~
VI
...........
~
o
o
VI
""'--"
~.-....
c
o
n
c:
3
tD
::J
r+
f.n
~
o
...
;a
tD
~
tD
...
tD
::J
n
tD
o 0 (I} ~ N
~~rD=.
~~.~Q.~
=:r (I} ","". ","". 0
rD=~=~
~ rD ~ _
~ .... rD .---..
~ ~. ~ ~ g
=t = ,~ = ~
","". ~ = ~ 0
~===-.~
.... ~!DOrD
~~~~~
-< (I} rD =Q.
","". rD -< ~ ~
~ (I} rD ..... Q.
!D ~= =:r-<
-<g'~9~
rD ~ -e:; ~
= ~ =:r rD ","".
~arD~~
.... ~~:;~
o ~ ~ ","". 0
~ ","". ","". ~ =
o -< ~ ~
~ = ","". ~ ;).
~o~~=
~ ~ (I} rD ","".
~ S' ~ ~ =
0=-< ~
~ ~ ","". 9 =:r
o ;). ~ ~ rD
=~.... (I} V'J
~. (I} -< ~ ~
~~~~i
..... rD = rD 0
~. !D ~ ~
Q.OrDl"!'j
rD~=Q
= rD ,.., ~
~ -< .. ","".
rD rD rD Q.
Q.= Q.~
0"" ~ ~ ~
"'< (I} 0 =
~=:r~Q.
=:r~==
rD """'" ~
~ =:r ~ =-.
a ~ =-. 0
~ rD -< =
~ ","". ~
o ~ .I""t """'"
~(I}~~
","". 0
o =
= rD
~ ~. ;. ~ s ~ ;. 5 e ~ ~ :-
=:;'~rDg.~~7;;a~Q3
~. """'" rD ;1 0 = 0 ~ rD rD ~ ~
","". rD ~ ~ CJQ = = ~ = ~ ~ ~
~ ~ = ~ ;:;. rD = I = ~ !D ~
..... rD ~ .. ~ (I} I""t ~ (I} (I} 0 =
rD ~ 0"" """'" ~ "< 0 ~ ~ ~ ","".
(I} o"'<~ ~ 0 ~=:rO~ ~
~ ~ = ~ rD ~ ~. ~ :4 ~ ....
;J. (I} 0 ~:t (I} 0 ~ (I} 0 ~
;.~ 7(1} rD 6-~ ~ ~= g
(I} ~ ~~ Q.~CJQ rD ~ 0 (I}
= ~ ~ =:r~ 0 ~ ~ Q. ~ ~
~ I ~ ,.. ,.. = ,.. ","". rD ~
~ 0"" ~ ~ ~ ~ ","". ~ = =
","". rD ~ ~ ~ = ~ 0"" ~ g ~
o. ","". 0 ~ d ~ =-. t::: ~ rD ~
a~;'gaig~~~a
rD rD ~ O""~~ (I} ~ 0 = rD
~ = ~ t::: 0 Cj. ~ d :4 0 S-
rD rD = 0..;' """'" Q. rD (I} ~ ....
:4 = N. ~ ","". ~ 0 Q. ~ ... rD
","". ~ ~ 0 (I} ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ =
~ Q. =-. ~ ~ ","". rD = = 6-;j
o ~ 0 ~ ~Jg = Q.~ t:::da
~ =:r = ,..,. ","". Q. ~o 0.... ~ rD
~ ~ (I} .. 0 ","". ~ ~ ~....
","". 0 ~ ~ = (I} ~ rD 0 ~ ~
= = = = ~ =:r~ """,,,0 rD
~ CJQ Q. Q. = ~. rD ~ ;). ~ =
~=:roo~~~~rD=o
","". (I} ~ ~ ~ ","". = Q. = rD Q.
~~ rD rD ~= 52:0 = Q.rD
~ -< = ;1 (I} ~ ","". ~ (I} ~ ~
~ ;:;. ~ ~ 0 =:r ~ 0.... = ~
~ rD 0 rD 0"" ","". ~ ~ ~ Q. ~
~ ~ ;. Q. rD a- ","". = ~ 0 ~
","". S rD 0 = ;. rD = ~ ","".
t::: ~ ~ (I} ;. ","". Q. Q. rD :;
~ :;- ~ 0 rD rD = ~ ~.;1 ","".
~=~Q.~~=o~=
S' ~ 52: d ~ ~ =:r Q. ~. rD ~
o (I} ;:;. rD ~ ~ rD 0 = Q. ~
~ ~ · Q. ~ ;). 0"" ~ = 8 ~
~&.g:~a;"8~J'~~
~ rD ~ Q. = ~. = ~ 0 rD =
rD~rD OrD~~~=~
~ (I} ~ =-. Q. ~.. =-. =.
~ rD ,~ O. ","". 0"" 0 ~
~ (I}:; = ~rD",< = ~
=:r 0 ~ (I} ","".
_ 0 =
.---r:l ~ ....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1""'1" ~ ~ ~ 0 1-'. ~ ~ VJ
~Q. ~g=rs~ag~:s..g=.
O I'D CJ,S 0 Q. (IJ :s..:t 0 0"::"J =:r 1-'. ~ Q. o~
1""'1" ~ ,~= (IJ I'D =. ~ = I'D rs = = ~
=:r ~... O"'~. 1-'. ~ ~ 1""'1" ~ ~ ~ ~ I'D ,~ ~
I'D ~ 0 = (IJ ~ ~ =:r 1-'. ~. = ~ 1""'1" ~ ~ =
~ ~ a-&' sag. ;. ~ s ~ a ~ ~ ;. ~
~ Q:. = ~ I'D =;; = ~ I'D I'D ~ 9. ~. ~ ~ 0
~ ., ,.., ~ = =. 0 I'D = = __ rT r- =
o ~ tt' =- ~ Q.. ~ 1-'. =:r ~ ~ o. =. =~. ~ <
(IJ 1-'. ~ 1""'1" (IJ ~ ~ ~ (IJ = I'D
I'D ~ ~ = ~ 0"' =:r ~ = ~ ~ ., 1""'1" 1-'. (IJ =
· ~ g 0 ~ ~ I'D = ~ ~ =:r~ ~ ~ ~ :t.
f""'to ~ g ~ 0"' 0"' ~ g ~ I'D :t. ~ (IJ 0
~~ Q:.~ ~o ~ =~ ~ ~ = < ~ ~ =
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'D ~ ~ ~ I'D CI) 0 0"'
_ 1""'1"= :t. = ""'"' ~ = ~. ~ ~ ~ (lJo = ".
'4 (IJ ~., - 1""'1" r- .... 0 ~ jI.-
I'D ~ f""'to 0 .~... H'" 0 ~ 0 ~., ~
~ ~ ~ = '< (IJ I'D ~ = ~ ~ ; ~. ~ ~
_ ~ 1""'1" ... ""'"',... ~... 1-'. 'lfJ'" ,.,
'4 ~ I'D 0 ~ ., 'lfJ I'D fI\I ~ 1""'1" ~ =
9. 0 (IJ - ~ (IJ 9 CI) ~ :;~. ~ 1-'. ~
rT 1""'1" '4 ~ ~ ., 0 0 I'D ~
~ g: ~ I'D =:r C2.. (IJ = Q.;;. ~ = = 1""'1"
1""'1" 1-'. I'D a I'D 1-'. 1""'1" ~ I'D CI) (IJ (IJ ~ 0
o. ~ ~ (IJ ~ = =:r... ~ 0 ~ 5. 1-'. =
~ ~ ~ 1-'. 0 I'D 0 0 0 ~ <.-. ~ ~.
., :t ., 0 ~... (IJ ~ (IJ 0"' 1-'. rT (IJ
~ Q.. ~ = ~ ~ I'D ~ o. I'D ~ =:r 0 f""'to
a 0"' ~ ~ ~ 1-'.; ~ = ~ ~ ~ ;. g'
....... ~ = g ~ = I'D 1""'1" ~ g. ~ 0 ~ =:;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 1-'. I'D = ~ I'D
I""'I"~I'DO~"I'D~I""'I"= ~=o~
=o=~e-:Q.~Q'.a~ ~~e;
~5I'D~=~l""'I"g~a =~~~
~ ~ e]. ~oCll ~ g 0 5' ~ 2.. e: ~ g
o 1-'. ""d I'D 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1""'1" = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5. =- ; ~ =:r ~. ~.
~ ~ ~ ~. Q 3. I'D ~ Q. = Q:. = =:r 1-'.
I'D'" ~ ' ~ "t ~ ~ 1-'. 1""'1" ., ~ ~
= ~ ~ ~I'D =:r" =... I'D~ ~~
~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ 1-'. I'D 0
,~ = ~ = ~ CI) ~ CI) ~ 0 ~ ~
Q. ~ (IJ Q. 0"' ~ 1-'. ~ =:r ~. = ~ g. =
0=~I'D~9~I'Doe =~~~
~ ~ Q. ~ <; ~ (IJ ~ I'D"" = ~ f""'to
0- E e 5. =:r ~ ~ ~ = 6 ~ 6- o.
~ ~ 1""'1" I'D., = ~ "I - =
==- 0 ~ ~ Q. I'D = = 5 ~ ~
~ ~ '{J I'D ~ ~. ~ 0"' ~ (IJ I'D
., ~ ~ < ... I'D 0=
~~ 0 ~ ~ g- ~~
~~ = (IJ ~ "'1
~ ~ ~ ~
o
...
--
Ni\
tDl
a.
,
i
ro ~ ro S' -p. 8 ~:> ~ 0 '-!J ~ (;5 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ (;5 (;5
;g M' ;g M' 00 (;"- ~ 0'"' ~ ~. ~ ~. '1:j 0 I-' n ~ ~
a~a~~~~n'1:jro~go~g~~gg~~
M' M' -. ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ M' ~ ~ M' ~. 00 n 00 llJ ----
o o~' M' ~ a ~....... ~ llJ 00 M' 0 M' M' 0 =:'~. ~ 0' M' M'
::r ~. llJ ~ ~ ()q' ::r M' o' ::r M' M' 0 '..~. ::r
g ~ ro S ~ n ~ .r-r ~ 0 ro ::r ~ ro ::r~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ro
~OllJ~roo ~~~oro Q..roM'llJ~M'~Q..
~ ~ n ~ llJ =:J N M' v ==- '1:j ~. 0 ro ~. 0 ....... ~ ~. 0 ro
00' g o. ~ ~ <: 8 ::r::r ~ ro ~ ~ 0'"' 00 0 00 ro 0 ~ 0'"'
M' t:: :5. -.. Q.. ro 0 ~ ~ on@t::llJ M' ~ '1:j '1:j Q....? llJ M'
~ ~ ~ ::r llJ ~ -. ('D M' llJ n 00 llJ ~ Q llJ 0 '1:j 00
~. -. 0 Q.. o. a ....... a t:: ~. ~ 0 ro ~ llJ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~
~ 00 ~ -< 0 ro llJ ~ 0 n =:J ~ n M' Q..~ ~
00 ro (6 ro ~ llJ n ~ O. ~ ro ;g ~. ro ro ~ 0 ro ~~.
llJ~<~n~~~~llJO~@~~llJ'1:j~o~@
00 ~. ro ~. ro ~ M' 00 ~ ~M' I-' ~ ro ~. 0
~ F6 --:. r6 a r6 ~ ~ g:. Q.. ~ o' g ~ g.. g.. @ & g ~
~. -. ~ M' ro M' ro """""' llJ a n ~ ~ n _~. M' ~. ". ~
~;g M' 0 ~ ::r -< n; M' llJ ::r n '-I ::r i:li" r6 ro 0 ::::.. 0
~ ~ llJ e; ~ ro ~ M' ~ S' 0'"' ro g 0'"' Q. 0 p... ~ 00 ~
n ~ >< ~. ~ '1:j c.. llJ <: M' 0 ~ Q.. 0 =:' ~ 0 0 ] Q..
ro ro ~ OOa M'~ ~ >< ro ro ~ 8'00 ~~o ~ ~~ 00
Q.. -. ~ ::r g ro ~ ro ~ Q.. -.~ ~ . Q.. -. M' '1:j llJ M' 00'
0'"' 0 '1/ ~. ro ro 6! ~ (t) llJ ~ llJ ~ ~ llJ ::r ~ ~ 00 00
~~~~=:,ro><M'n~ ~~ ~~O'"'~~~
M'ro~M'~Q..~::rM'ro Q..ro Q.. =:'llJllJro
::r;g ro::r 00 0 ro ro Q.. M' (t) n ~ . ~ Q..
ro~oorooO~'1:jQ..on oM'M' ooo~~nM'
~llJ~~~M' M' 0 '1:joo----ro::ro
~ M' ~ M' M' M' ::r e; 0 ~ '1:j llJ ro 0 Q.. 00' ~
o 0- ~ llJ ::r::r ro '1:j ....... 00 llJ::ti ~ ro ~ 00 ro ~ ;
a llJ '1/ 8' ro ro '1:j 0 ro 0 ~ ~ M' ~ ~ '1:j ~ ~
o :::: ~ 0 ~ 6! ~ r6 ~;:: g:. ~ ::r ~. ~ ~. ~ ~
M' ::r ro ~ ~ >< ~ 00 M' - ro n ro::r l-oIoo' ~ ~. n
o' llJ ~ ~ Q.. M' 0 ro ::r 8 '1:j ro '1:j 00 llJ ()q =:' ro
~<:Q..oooooo~ro~ .......M' ~~~~~c..
ro ro ~ . '1:j ro ~ M' -< llJ::r ~ =< l-oIoo' llJ -. ~
o llJ Q..~. llJ 00 a llJ ro ~ ro ~ ~I'o ~. 0 ro
~ 00 ~ Q.. ~ llJ >< ~ ~ n ~. Q. ~ ~ ~ n
M' 0 0 llJ M' ~ ro ~ ~ ~. 0 ~ ro v ~. M' 0
::r ~ ~ llJ ::r M' ~ o~. ~ ~ ()q ~ ~ Jg ::r ~
ro ro llJ ~ ro::r ~ ~ 0 ()q 00 llJ M' llJ ro 00
~0~Q.. ogrog:.~ ~~ ~ro(;"~llJ~
O. ~ ~ ~ '1:j N' ~ ro F6 Q.. t:: Q.. ~ Q.. ~ B ~
-< ~. M' llJ ro ro ~ '1:j ~ ~ Q.. ro 0'"' n ~ M'
~. 00 =t 00.@Q..M't:: (;" ~ o' ro ~ ~ ::r 00' o'
~ a ~. o. ~. ::r ~ ~ 00 ~ ~. 00' M' 00' ~. ~
00 llJ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~. '1:jo ~ ~. -. ()q ro ::r ro ~.-'
ro ~.-' llJ ~ 00 00 0 V~ ~ ~ ro 0 ~
~ ~ 00:::: llJ ~ ~ r6 ~ ~ ro n 0 0 ~ ~ ro
:5'1:j ~~ ~ 0'"'1-' 00 llJ n n 0 ~ ~ n -. n
n' ~ ~. llJ Q..'1:j g llJ '1:j ~ s ~::ti ~ s-; 8 g
-.ro ~ n ~ a ~ llJ t:: ro M' en 00 ~ ro .r-t ~ 00
-< '-I ro l-oIoo' llJ ~ M' ~ 00 M' ~ - ~ ~ 00 M'
('D 0 -. llJ CJ'Q llJ ::r o' ~. ~ ~. ~ 0 ro M' ~
~ 00 -< ~. ~ ()q 0 Q.. ~ t:: n Q ~~. a ~
~ ~ 0 a ~ @ ~. 0 8 B-. e; ~ llJ g:. n O.
-. M' t:: ro ::r '1:j ro ~ ::i 0 ~ ro O. 0
o g--.ro ~ N ~Q..~ ro..? ~ ~ o..?
~ ~.~. '1:j Q.. ~ 0
o n ~M' 0 -. ~
~ ro 0 ~
::s
CAC August 12, 2010
VIlI-2 New Business
1 of 11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation for the CAC to recommend approval to the BCC the changes as
outlined below to the Clam Bay Peer review process with the PBSD.
OBJECTIVE: Recommendation for the CAC to recommend approval to the BCC the
changes as outlined below to the Clam Bay Peer review process with the PBSD.
CONSIDERATION: At the 12/15/2009 BCC meeting the Board approved the following
objective for Clam Bay:
"To obtain approval of activities that are required to complete the development of a
comprehensive, long term management plan for the Clam Bay estuary including ratification of
the Clam Bay Advisory Committee update report dated September 25, 2009; extension of the
term of the Clam Bay Advisory Committee to June 30, 2010; approval of the proposed FY
2010 budget of $234,917; approval of the Clam Bay System Data Collection and Analysis
Report recommendations and approval of a peer review of this report conducted by an
independent expert jointly selected by Coastal Zone Management and the Pelican Bay
Services Division."
Also during the considerations portion of the executive summary, the following was
discussed and approved concerning Peer Review:
"It is also recommended that an independent peer review, of the Clam Bay Water
Circulation/Flushing Modeling Program and the Clam Bay System Data Collection Analysis
Report recently completed by PBS&J be performed by a recognized expert. This expert,
jointly selected by Pelican Bay Services Division and Coastal Zone Management, will be from
an academic/university background and not directly involved with any consulting firm. The
review of the Clam Bay Data Collection and Analysis Report is proposed to be conducted
early in the development of the flushing/circulation model. It is also recommended that the
cost of this effort and any future phased peer review be split between the Pelican Bay
Services Division and Coastal Zone Management."
The following budget was approved at that time:
Fund 111 - Unincorporated Collier County
Court Recording and Documentation Costs
Water Quality Monitoring in Clam Bay System
Chemicals and YSI probes
lab Fees (9 locations for 12 months)
Consulting and Analysis Support
Public Outreach and Communication
Peer Review
Sediment toxicology
Installation of Beach and Inlet Safety signs and Permitting
Permitting and Installation of Navigational Markers in Clam Bay
Estuary Wildlife and Habitat Preliminary Analysis
$3,400
Fund 111 Subtotal
$1,000
$18,000
$4,000
$1,000
$5,000
$30,000
$5,000
$15,000
$20,000
$102,400
CAC August 12, 2010
VIll-2 New Business
2 of 11
Although the PBSD was identified as the organization to jointly participate with CZM in
the peer review, the PBSD has focused only on the peer review of the Data Collection
and Analysis Report from PBS&J not committed to the Peer review of the modeling
program. PBSD has sought to limit their commitment/participation to this portion of the
project. Additionally, it has proven hard to reach agreement with on the scope of this
peer review with the PBSD.
The modeling program is the heart of the program and the area needed to concentrate
our technical expertise on. The Pelican Bay Foundation has approached the County
staff with a request to participate in the technical development and review of the
modeling program with two independent qualified consultants. This proposal is
acceptable to the County because:
1. It establishes a working relationship and framework with the Pelican Bay
Community to discuss and address technical issues.
2. It is proposed in a collaborative working relationship as opposed to a critique
format of a peer review.
3. It provides additional technical expertise to confirm our focus, approach and
conclusions.
4. The PB Foundation will pay for their own consultants with the only cost incurred
by the County being to bring these consultants up to speed with the background
and results to date.
5. It allows us to begin discussion and work of the modeling process.
6. While we are working on the technical issues of the modeling program with the
PB Foundation, it allows us to continue to try to reach closure with the PBSD on
the Peer Review of the PBS&J Data Collection and Analysis report.
Staff has reevaluated the existing budget and is recommending that the budget be
reprogrammed to provide money for PBSD peer review and the collaborative model
development with the PB Foundation. Funding and approach should be reallocated into
two phases:
1. One portion of the Peer Review would be the peer review of the PBS&J Data
Collection and Analysis report. This can be completed anytime when and if
agreement is reached with the PBSD on the scope of this work. If agreement is
not reached then FDEP has expressed a willingness to evaluate the report and
comment on it accuracy and credibility. $4,500 has been set aside for the County
portion of this work.
2. The second portion of this work is the technical participation and review of the
modeling program. $25,000 has been set aside for this work which would involve
bringing the Foundations consultants up to speed and more group/discussion
meetings to discuss scope, review results and formulate next steps and findings.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIlI-2 New Business
3 of 11
Our revised budget projections are as follows:
Fund 111-Unincorporated Collier Budl!et Revised Spent Available ToGo
Court Recording and Documentation Costs $3,400 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $500
Water Quality Monitoring in Clam Bay
System
Chemicals and YSI probes $1,000 $800 $800 $0 $0
lab Fees (9 locations for 12 months) $18,000 $15,000 $12,500 $2,500 $2,500
Consulting and Analysis Support $4,000 $4,000 $0 $4,000 $0
Public Outreach and Communication $1,000 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0
Peer Review of the PBS&J Report - PBSD $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $4,500
Technical Development Modeling - PB
Foundation $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Sediment toxicology $30,000 $30,000 $31,831 -$1,831 -$1,831
Beach/lnlet Safety signs and Permitting $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0
Permit/Install Nav Markers in Clam Bay $15,000 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $0
Wildlife and Habitat Preliminary Analysis $20,000 $20,000 $0 $20,000 $20,000
Total $102,400 $97,800 $47,131 $50,669 $50,669
Recommendations are sought as follows:
1. Recommend to the BCC that the peer review process as authorized by the BCC
on 12/15/2009 be modified to include a peer review of the October 2009 PBS&J
technical report and a technical collaboration of the modeling program with the
PB Foundation.
2. Reallocate funding from what was originally approved to provide for $4,500 for
the PBSD Peer review and $25,000 for the technical collaboration of the
modeling program with the PB Foundation.
3. Approve Revision 9 of the Peer Review scope of work with the PBSD.
The latest revision to the PBSD peer review program is attached.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS:
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds has previously been approved from the general
revenue Fund 111 on 12/15/2009 and reallocated as discussed within the existing
funding.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has not been reviewed or approved by the
County Attorney's Office.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIlI-2 New Business
4 of 11
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation for the CAC to recommend approval to the
BCC the following changes to the Clam Bay Peer review process with the PBSD.
1. Recommend to the BCC that the peer review process as authorized by the BCC
on 12/15/2009 be modified to include a peer review of the October 2009 PBS&J
technical report and a technical collaboration of the modeling program with the
PB Foundation
2. Reallocate funding from what was originally approved to provide for $4,500 for
the PBSD Peer review and $25,000 for the technical collaboration of the
modeling program with the PB Foundation.
3. Approve Revision 9 of the Peer Review scope of work with the PBSD
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
..( ;" .
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-2 New Business
5 of 11
~inGary
. From:
Sent:
To:
)
Feldhaus, Stephen [sf@feldhauslaw.com]
Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:05 AM
Bill Carpenter; Bob Naegele; Bob Uek; Doug Esson; Jim Hoppensteadt; Mike Coyne; Robert
Pendergrass; Ronnie Bellone; Feldhaus, Stephen
ochsJ; John Sorey; McAlpinGary; ramsey-m; Cora Obley; hprice@price-Iaw.com; Mary
Johnson; Doug Durbin; Erik J. Olsen (eolsen@olsen-associates.com); Geoffrey Scott Gibson;
Hunter Hansen; John Baron; John Chandler; John Domenie; John laizzo; Keith Dallas; Mary
Anne Womble; Mike Levy; Theodore Raia; Tom Cravens; Joanne Hobin; Joesph Chicurel ;
Lee Canning; Merlin Lickhalter; Pat Bush; Philip St. Germain; Stanley Farb ; Susan Boland;
W. Terry Upson; William Klauber
A Clam Bay Update
Cc:
Subject:
Dear Foundation Board Members,
Yesterday Jim Hoppensteadt and I had a potentially historic meeting with Marla Ramsey, Administrator of Collier County
Public Services, and Gary McAlpin, Director of Collier County Coastal Zone Management. The meeting would not have
been possible without the leadership and support of Leo Ochs, Collier County Manager, and John Sorey, Naples City
Councilman and Chairman of the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee.
The purpose of the meeting was to determine whether the Foundation and Collier County could find a way to work
together on Clam Bay and particularly on the ten year permit and management plan for Clam Bay. I am pleased to be
able to report that we reached a preliminary and tentative agreement, although there is a ton of work that remains to
be done to flesh out the particulars and to ensure that the key players on both sides are on board. And while nothing
will be final until an agreement is reduced to writing and formally agreed by both the Board of County Commissioners
e and the Pelican Bay Foundation Board, which will take months to put together assuming that there is support for this
endeavor at the Board levels of the County and the Foundation, we have agreed to begin immediately to work together
on the scientific issues underlying the permit and management plan. Our coastal engineering and environmental
consultants will engage with the coastal engineering and environmental consultants of the county in an attempt jointly
to determine what studies of Clam Bay are required, how they should be conducted, etc.
This is a ground breaking endeavor. On our part, the Foundation is recognizing the legitimate role of the County to be
involved in the management of a key County resource. We are also recognizing the legitimate role ofthe other
stakeholders in Clam Bay and in the larger coastal estuary system, including the residents of Seagate and the City of
Naples. On its part, the County is recognizing the legitimate role of the Foundation as the party entrusted by the 1982
Declarations to protect and preserve Clam Bay, both for the benefit of our members and for the residents of all of Collier
County. The proposed resolution will not, however, be based upon the 1982 Declarations nor will it involve an
acknowledgement by the County that the 1982 Declarations apply to the submerged lands of Clam Bay, a main point of
contention between us. Instead, we propose to agree, in a binding document, to joint management of Clam Bay under
the permit and the ten year management plan, with a provision for binding arbitration in the event we are unable to
reach agreement on scientific or policy issues with respect to that management.
Our proposed resolution does not resolve the red and green lateral navigational marker issue, but I would note that it
may well be a harbinger of the possibility of a resolution yet to come. For now, we are going to continue to disagree on
that issue, and each party will retain all their full legal rights with respect to that issue.
While the "contracting party" with the County will be the Foundation, we will want to ensure that Pelican Bay speaks
with one voice on this endeavor. Accordingly, I am copying both the PBSD Board and the PBPOA Board on this emall,
e with a request that they vet this proposal and provide the Foundation with their comments. I would also expect that the
Foundation would seek additional community input on this proposed resolution, and to begin that process I am copying
the Pelican Bay Mangrove Action Group President on this email.
1
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-2 New Business
6 of 11
As always, the devil will be in the details, and there is much work yet to be done. And yet however this endeavor turns
out, the step we took yesterday is emblematic of a reality that we cannot escape and that will be part of any ultimate
resolution of our "dispute" with the County over the governance of Clam Bay-both the Foundation and the County
. have a legitimate seat at the table on Clam Bay matters. What we have tentatively and preliminarily agreed is one way
to recognize that joint interest. We are both hopeful that we can implement our desired resolution, which is why we
have agreed to begin working together on the science of Clam Bay immediately, but if for some reason we fail to reach
final agreement, we are still going to wind up working together in Clam Bay. To me, it makes more sense to do that
voluntarily than to battle this out for years before the DEP, the Corps, the FFWCC, the USCG, the NOAA, etc., and,
potentially, the courts.
Best,
Steve Feldhaus
e
e
2
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-2 New Business
7 of 11
~inGary
_ From:
. Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Feldhaus, Stephen [sf@feldhauslaw.com}
Wednesday, July 07,20103:54 PM
McAlpinGary
ochsJ; ramsey-m; James Hoppensteadt; Erik J. Olsen (eolsen@olsen-associates.com);
Doug Durbin
Clam Bay
Gary,
I had a very productive conference call today with Erik Olsen and Doug Durbin, whom, as I indicated last week, have
been out of pocket. We are ready to rock and roll on Clam Bay, and would appreciate your authorizing PBS&J and
Coastal Engineering to release their work product to Erik and Doug and to cooperate with them so that we can begin to
catch up with you and with your consultants.
It would be helpful as we start this process if you and your team would copy Erik and Doug and Jim and myself on just
about everything. That will cut down our need for coordination among ourselves
I will be glad to have Erik and Doug make the first contact if you just let me know whom they should call.
We are enthusiastic about this opportunity to work on a collegial basis with the county on Clam Bay matters, and look
forward to establishing a solid, long term working relationship. I can tell you that we have received overwhelming
support within our community for this endeavor. Now it is up to us to make it work, and to create a structure that the
leadership on both sides will buy into.
e Please feel free to call me at any time if you have any questions or comments about the best way we should get this off
the ground. I know that there will be a learning curve on everyone's part, but with good will and hard work I expect that
we are going to make a lot of progress quickly.
The contact info for Erik, Doug, Jim, and me follows.
Best,
Steve
Erik J. Olsen
Olsen Associates, Inc.
4438 Herschel Street
Jacksonville, Fl32210
Phone: 904-387-6114
Fax: 904-384-7368
Email: eolsen@olsen-associates.com
Douglas J. Durbin
Entrix, Inc.
3905 Crescent Park Drive
e Riverview, FL 33578
Phone: 813-664-0440
Fax: 813-625-5033
Email: ddurbin@entrix.com
1
. .
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-2 New Business
8 of 11
James F. Hoppensteadt
_ Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc.
. 6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
Phone: 239-596-6180, extension 223
Fax: 239-597-6927
Cell: 239-398-7074
Emall: Jimh@pelicanbav.org
Stephen M. Feldhaus
Feldhaus Law Group, P.C.
3901 52nd Street NW
Washington, DC 20016
Phone: 202-237-0511
Fax: 202-207-1027
Cell: 202-531-2211
Email: sf@feldhauslaw.com
e
--
2
Clam Bay Estuary
Peer Review Scope of Work
March 15,2010
March 19, 2010 - Rev. 1
June 25,2010 - Rev. 2
June 30, 2010 - Rev. 3
July 1, 2010 - Rev. 4
July 1,2010 - Rev. 5
July 1, 2010 - Rev. 6
July 23,2010 - Rev. 7
July 29, 2010- Rev 8
Auaust 5.2010- Rev. 9
This is a guideline document developed by the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD)
and the Coastal Zone Management/Coastal Advisory Committee (CZM/CAC) with the
intent of providing guidance to aid the PBSD and CZM/CAC in jointly selecting a peer
reviewer for the October 2009 PBS&J report described below.
Backaround
During their regular December 15, 2009 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners
approved an independent peer review of the October 2009 PBS&J report and the work
required to complete the development of a comprehensive management plan for the
Clam Bay Estuary.
Specifically, the BCC authorized that a recognized expert perform an independent
review of the Final October 2009 Clam Bay System Data Collection and Analysis Report
completed by PBS&J. rhereinafter the "October 2009 PBS&J Report"] To complete this
analysis, a thorough review of all available historicallwater quality data including the
Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) historical water quality data is required. This
expert, jointly selected by PBSD and Coastal Zone Management (CZM), will be from an
academic, university, research institute or national estuary program and not directly
involved with any consulting firm. Additionally, this individual will be independent without
any material relationship with the PBSD, the Pelican Bay Foundation or Collier County
govemment.
The review of the October 2009 PBS&J Reoort Clam 8ay Data Collection ami ,I\nalysis
Repeft-is proposed to be conducted early in the development of the water
flushing/circulation model. It is also recommended that the cost of this effort be split
between the PBSD and CZM. The current financial commitment from the PBSD is only
for the October 2009 PBS&J Report PBS&J report evaluation. After the peer review of
the October 2009 PBS&J Report Final P8S&J r~port is completed and distributed, the
PBSD will consider participating in the peer review of other studies or reports that
includes the Clam Bay NRPA.
Consideration
J I
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-2 New Business
9 of 11
A thorough review of the October 2009 PBS&J Reoort PBS&J report should involve a
number of critical sciences. Among others, these disciplines would involve water
quality, marine biology, modeling/hydrology, geology, natural estuary/ecosystems and
knowledge of Florida water quality standards/guidelines along with modeling, modeling
data and collection methodologies.
The '.vater quality expertise that is r-equirea for the PBS&J report is not just the r-eview
anE! analysis ta state stanE!arE!s aut als9 expertise .....ittl respect to the praactive
E!e'lelapment af Sl;lr spesiRe water EllJality stanE!arEls for the Clam Bay estl;lary system
anE! the establishment af aur awn ml:llti year estuary management J3r-egram that will
aE!E!ress critiEl31 water ql:lality issues as apposea to having FoEP estaelisR soll:ltions.
While ather skill sets ar-e important, the '.last majority of the reviewer expei'tise neeas to
be feel:lsed in these aiseipline areas.
4.Actlvitles to be performed durina this Peer Review of the October 2009 PBS&J .
Report
.t.Review, analysis and critique of the October 2009 PBS&J Reoort.Clam Bay System
Data CalleGtion ana .'\nalysis report aatea October 2gg9 perfermee BY P8S&J to
include:
.Analysis of all availa13le historical Elata inellJding the Services Di'/ision's
histeriGal aata.'informatisR.
.AcGioIFacy ana sl:.Iffieieney af the aata collection efforts unaertaken in the
ae\'elapmeRt of the PBS&J Clam 8ay System Data Callection aRa
Analysis repart given the fragile natur-e af the Clam Bay NRPA. the
sORtracting sonstraints anEl ability ta al:lgment Elata with fl;ltl:lre Galle6tiaFl
and the applicability of using the colleates Elata in the proposeEl water
circulation{flushing meael progr-am.
./\seurasy of methoaolagies l;lsea in the Clam Bay System Data Colleetion
ana Analysis Report perfermed by PBS&J.
· Appropriateness of Rnsings. sanslusiens, r-eeemmenaatiens. aREI
sl:lmmary af the report.
Evaluation of Proposals
Already pre-identified candidates by the PBSD and CMZlCAC will be solicited to submit
credentials and proposals to perform a Peer Review of the October 2009 PBS&J
~PBS&J Data Callestion and Analysis report. Only pre-identified candidates will
be allowed to submit proposals for evaluation. The Collier County purchasing
department would confirm with the PBSD Chairman and the CAC Chairman the
proposed list of candidates to be approached and then initiate this solicitation.
Solicitations for RFP to each candidate will be recorded onto a log and the log provided
to PBSD and CZM/CAC. All proposals will be jointly evaluated and must be acceptable
to both Collier County Coastal Zone Management ICAe and the Pelican Bay Services
Division.
The Evaluation and Selection process is outlined as follows:
2 I
CAC August 12. 2010
VIII-2 New Business
10 of 11
i Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
, I'ornatted: Font: Bold
1. Candidates will submit their qualifications, experiences, related work history and
schedule for consideration. This summary should not be more that 4 pages in total
length and focus on water quality, marine biology, hydrology, geology, and natural
estuary/ecosystems.
+.L-Selection will be based on a total composite score. This score will be based on .
knowledge, experience, work history and background in similar ecosystems as per
the criteria listed in item one above. Schedule will also be considered in this
evaluation.
+.~ The Pelican Bay Services Division will perform their own independent evaluation
and submit their three top candidates for discussion. Coastal Zone
Management/CAC will do the same. The six potential candidates will be jointly
evaluated by a committee consisting of The Chairman of the Pelican Bay Services
Division, the Vice Chair of the Pelican Bay Services Division, and the
director/Manager of the Pelican Bay Services Division, the Chairman of the CAC, the
Vice Chair of the CAC and the Director of the CZM. This group will select and
recommend the final candidate.
+.4-:-- The final selection must be approved by both the Pelican Bay Services Division
board and the CZM/CAC. which aoorovals will not be unreasonablv withheld. The
final sanEliElate selection will al&Erbe appFEl'.'eEl made by the BCC.
31
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-2 New Business
11 of 11
{ Formatted: e;:,Uets and Numbering
~
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
1 of 36
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
To share recently submitted Grant applications to FDEP for cost share funding
with the State.
OBJECTIVE: To share recently submitted Grant applications to FDEP for cost share
funding with the State.
CONSIDERATIONS: This is for information only no action is required.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS:
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: This is for information only no action is required.
PREPARED BY: Gail Hambright, CZM Accountant
CAC August 12, 2010
VlIl-3 New Business
2of36
FY 2011-12 Local Government Funding Request
Project Name: Collier Countv Beach Nourishment Proiect
Project Description: This project includes the yearly physical beach monitoring, biological
monitoring for the artificial reef and nearshore hardbottom, and design will lead to
renourishment in 2012/13.
The 2005/06 re-nourishment project consisted of the restoration, using approximately 665,000
cubic yards of hydraulic fill, and maintenance of up to eight miles of Gulf of Mexico shoreline
along unincorporated Collier County and the City of Naples. This project was completed in May
2006 with the main goal to avoid environmental impacts such as hard-bottom coverage and a
design project life of six to eight years. The borrow area was located just over 33 miles north-
northwest of Vanderbilt Beach and was chosen due to the coarser sand availability which will
generally avoid near-shore hard-bottom coverage. A one acre artificial reef was constructed to
satisfy mitigation permit requirements.
In 1995/1996 much of the same project area was hydraulically re-nourished. Approximately
240,000 cubic yards of upland sand was placed for maintenance and another 160,000 cubic yards
of sand was bypassed since this major re-nourishment project.
The renourishment in 2012-2013 will be approximately 500,000 cubic yards and will include a
new area, Clam Bay Park within the Park Shore Segment. The project will reach its six year
design life in 2012113 and hot spot nourishment in required.
Project Location: The City of Naples/Collier County Beach Renourishment Project is located
on the southwest Florida coastline in Collier County between Florida Department of
Environmental Protection monuments R-22 and R-79. The project consists of approximately 5
miles of critically eroded Gulf shoreline.
Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FYll1l2 will be used for annual
physical monitoring, biological monitoring, and turtle monitoring activities associated with the
2006 construction and design and permitting tasks in preparation of the upcoming renourishment
in FY 121l3. The renourishment in FY 12113 will be approximately 500,000 cubic yards.
GAG August 12, 2010
VIII.3 New Business
30f36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
Local Government SUDDort
Does this sponsor have dedicated support staff whose sole priority is to manage beach erosion
control activities? Yes
Name Title Email Percent
Commitment
Gary McAlpin Director, Coastal Zone GaryMcAlpin@coIliergov. 100%
Mana"ement net
Address 1: 3301 East Tamiami Trail Phone: 239-252-2966
W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite
103
Address 2: Naoles, Ftorida 341t2 Fax: 239-252-2950
Quarterly Report Compliance:
Com liant
N
N
N
N
How will revenue for the local funding cost share be established?
Local funding for the project will be obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development
Tax. This provides a dedicated long term funding source through a 'bed tax'. Collier County
levies a four (4%) percent Tourist Development Tax on all rental income received from
accommodations rented for six months or less.
Is the funding from a dedicated long term source for this project? Yes
Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Taxes to beach maintenance, including
funding projects within the City of Naples. Collier County has a dedicated staff.
In order to acquire funding, a resolution from the local governmental entity must be
provided by the application deadline which declares:
. Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project
. Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor
. Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share
. Funding Source
Has the local sponsor resolution heen attached to the application fulfilling all of these
requirements? Yes. it will be provided.
The Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted resolution dated September 2005
and again in 2006 is on file at FDEP offices.
This project is detailed in Collier County's lO-year Capital Plan for Beach Projects which has
been approved by Collier County Board of County Commissioners.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIIl-3 New Business
4of36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY IlIl2 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
Has the State cost-shared in a feasibility or design phase of this project?
Yes
Previous State Cost Share percentage
32.2%
10-Year Proiect Schedule and 5-Year Estimated Budl!et
Does this project have Congressional Authorization?
Yes
Does this project have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement?
No
What is the end date of the Federal Authorization?
n/a
Federal cost share available for this erosion eontrol project: 75%
Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and Naples have FEMA Category G funds due to damage as a result of
Tropical Storm Fay. This has been included within the 5-year estimated budget under the
Federal Cost Share column at 75% of eligible cost. It is essential that construction be funded by
the State, so that Federal (FEMA) funds will be available.
Schedule and Budget (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for
5 years.):
Year
Proposed
Method
Design
oOllormg
Monitorin
Design
onstructlon
omtormg
omtonng
omtormg
oOltormg
oOltanng
omlonng
omtonng
onltonng
Description
Total
Estimated Cost
Federal Cost
Share
State Cost
Share
Local Cost
Share
$589,857
$200,000
1,00,
$258,750
o
$131,632
$150,000
7,741,883
$31,188
10 ,
$165,694
$18,080
5, 1
$55,062
, 3
2012/2013
Renourishment
P ys, urt es
Phys, Biological
Renourishment
Renouns ment
$345,000
2011/2012
Length of Project Boundary in Feet:
40.620 ft
Length of commercial or recreational property fronting the project shoreline:
29375 ft
Percentage of project shoreline designated as commercial or recreational property
36.16%
CAC August 12, 2010
VIIl-3 New Business
50f36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
Eligibility:
Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments:
Cost Sharing Summary
Reach
Length (ft) Eligible Length (ft)
Vanderbilt Beach
Park Shore/Clam Pass Park
Naples Beach
8,480
12,765
19,375
7,230
3,735
18,410
Total
40,620
29,375
Eligible Shoreline %
State Cost Share %
72.32%
36.16%
See Attachment 1 for detailed listing and maps.
The Collier County occupational licenses and the Florida Department of Businesses and
Professional Regulation licenses for the following hotels are on file and can be provided if
required.
Additional Rankin!! Criteria
Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously- constructed project?
Yes
Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline?
Yes
Rate of Erosion as determined by the Bureau based on long term data (ftlyr)
4.5 ftlvr
Severity of Erosion:
A majority of the project area has been designated by FDEP as critically eroded. The Naples
Beach area is currently experiencing the most severe erosion rate in the project area, losing an
average of 6.4 ft/yr since June 2006. The Vanderbilt Beach and Pelican Bay project areas have
been eroding at a rate of 5.0 feet per year since construction of the 2006 project. The Park Shore
project area has eroded 5.4 feet since June 2006. Erosion within the total project area has
averaged 4.5 ft/yr since 1996.
Threat to Upland Structures:
Based upon a similar modeling study within the region, 4 I structures are threatened due to
recession from the 25-year storm.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII.3 New Business
6 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
Project Benefits:
Shoreline development within the project area consists of over 29,000 linear feet of publicly
accessible beach. 7,230 linear feet (85%) of the Vanderbilt Beach property is commercial or
recreational. This includes four hotels, Delnor-Wiggins State Park and Collier County's
Vanderbilt Beach Road Park. 3,725 linear feet (29.26%) of the Park Shore property is zoned
commercial or recreational and eligible. Another 2,300 feet is Clam Pass Park, but although this
area is erosional, it is not designated as critically eroded. This includes three public access streets
(City of Naples). 18,410 linear feet (95.02%) of the Naples Beach property is zoned commercial
or recreational. This includes the City of Naples' Lowdermilk Park, two hotels and numerous
public access streets and walkways. The attached maps identify public beach access points,
hotels, and other commercial facilities within the project area. Threatened and endangered
marine turtles utilize the entire project area for nesting purposes although none of the areas
within the project area have been designated as a seaturtle refuge.
Periodic dredging and bypassing has taken place at Wiggins Pass, Clam Pass, Doctors Pass and
Gordon Pass in recent decades. The total volume of sand bypassed to adjacent beaches from the
four inlets since completion of the 1996 project is estimated at approximately 600,000 cubic
yards.
Use ofInnovative Applications of Existing Technologies:
Current technologies in practice will be used for the upcoming renourishment project and
subsequent monitorings. In addition, an investigation to improve hot spot performance and tune
structures using modeling is planned. Sand performance has met expectations, and beach
widening is feasible without significant threat to nearshore hardbottom.
Nourishment Interval (vears):
6-8
Project Performance:
The project was built between January 23, 2006 to May 23, 2006, with dredging starting on
February 21, 2006. Collier County's 8.5 miles of renourished shorelines include Vanderbilt
Beach, Pelican Bay, North Park Shore, Park Shore, and Naples Beach. These beaches were
renourished with an as-built sand volume of approximately 667,562 cubic yards of sand during
construction. The project was constructed by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (GLDD)
with two hopper dredges, the Sugar Island and the Manhattan Island. Dredge and fill operations
lasted a total of 92 days. All of the project areas were renourished with sand from the Borrow
Area T-l, which is located approximately 33 miles northwest of Delnor- Wiggins State Park.
Volumetric changes measured from the pre-construction November 2005 survey to the three year
post-construction July 2009 survey measured 529,278 cubic yards remaining in the project area
or 80% of the design volume. It appears that the shorelines are still recovering from the active
2004-5 and 2008 storm season where Tropical Storm Fay affected the project area.
The next full nourishment is scheduled for FY 2012/2013 at the planned 6-year renourishment
interval.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
70f36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
Is tbis project being planned or constructed in cooperation witb another local government?
Explain? Yes
Collier County and the City of Naples are jointly sponsoring this project, and monitoring for all
of Collier County projects is combined for economy.
CAG August 12, 2010
VIIl-3 New Business
8of36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY t 1112 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
ATTACHMENT 1
FUNDING ELIGIBILITY
COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT
VanderbiIt Beach Sel!ment
Project Boundary: 350' south ofR22 to 500' south of R30
Approximate Shoreline Length: 8,480'
Public Access
Delnor Wiggins State Recreation Area"
Vanderbilt Beach Road"
On-site
SDaces
340
149
Adjacent
SDaces
o
18
Total
SDaces
340
167
Oualifvinl! Hotels
La Playa
Ritz Carltont
Oualifvinl! Shoreline
360'
750'
Area determined to be Dubliclv accessible
350' south ofR22to 150' nortb ofT25
30' soutb of R26 to R31 t
Total Lenl!th
2,640'
4,590'
Area determined to be criticallv eroded
R22.3 to R30.5
Total eligible shoreline length: 7,230'
Total project shoreline length: 8,480'
Percent elil!ible for State fundinl!: 85.26%.
State eligibility incorporates the total project length (critical and non-critical) and eligibility only recognizes publicly
accessible critically eroded shoreline.
"Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms.
tOverlap
CAC August 12, 2010
Vlll.3 New Business
9of36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
FUNDING ELIGIBILITY
COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURlSHMENT PROJECT
Park Shore & Clam Bay Park Sel!ment
Project Boundary: 200' south of R42 to 390' south of R54
Approximate Shoreline Length: 12,765'
On-site Parking Spaces
Metered Permit*
24 14
27 10
o 0
o 180
Adjacent
Spaces
15
o
50
o
Total
Spaces
53
37
50
180
Public Access
Horizon Way
Vedado Way
Seagate Drive
Clam Pass Park
Area determined to be publicly accessible
870' south of R50 to 290' south of R54
Total Lenl!th
3,735'
Area determined to be critically eroded
R50.5 to 390' south of R54
Total eligible shoreline length: 3,735'
Total project shoreline length: 12,765'
Percent elil!ible for State fundinl!: 29.26%
State eligibility incorporates the total project length (critical and non-critical) and eligibility only recognizes publicly
accessible critically eroded shoreline,
'Permit spaces are available to residents and the general public for the same price.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
10of36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
FUNDING ELIGIBILITY
COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT
NaDles Sel!ment
Project Boundary: 1,050' north of R58 to R 79
Approximate Shoreline Length: 19,375'
On-site Spaces Adjacent Spaces Total
Pnblic Access Public Permit" Public Permit** SDaces
Lowdermilk Park' 52 162 0 0 214
8th A venue North 21 0 0 0 21
7th A venue North 10 2 0 0 12
North Lake A venue 19 19 0 o. 38
6th A venue North 6 4 0 0 10
5th Avenue North 0 0 0 0 0
4th A venue North II 4 0 0 15
3rd A venue North 10 4 0 0 14
2nd A venue North 12 4 0 0 16
1" A venue North 11 6 0 0 17
Central Drive 8 4 0 0 12
1 ,t A venue South 5 11 0 0 16
2nd A venue South 7 4 0 0 11
3rd A venue South 8 6 0 0 14
4th A venue South 10 5 0 0 15
5th A venue South 21 0 20 15 56
6th A venue South 4 8 0 0 12
7'h A venue South 10 6 0 0 16
8th Avenue South 6 5 0 0 11
9th A venue South 11 4 0 0 15
10th Avenue South 15 6 0 0 21
11th A venue South 8 5 0 0 13
Broad A venue 20 0 28 0 48
12th Avenue South' 4 0 103 0 107
]3th A venue South 22 0 9 0 31
14th Avenue South 16 14 0 0 30
15th A venue South 10 8 0 0 18
16th A venue South 16 14 0 0 30
1 7'h A ven ue South 7 3 0 0 10
18th A venue South 12 13 14 0 39
19th A ven ue South 0 0 0 0 0
21" Avenue South 0 0 0 20 20
'Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms
"Permit spaces are available to residents and the general public for the same price
CAC August 12, 2010
VIIl.3 New Business
11 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Collier County Beach Renourishment
Oualifvinl! Hotels
Edgewater Hotel
Oualifvinl! Shoreline
265'
Area determined to be Dubliclv accessible
85' north ofR58 to R79
Total Lenl!th
18,410'
Area determined to be criticallv eroded
R57.8 to R79
Total eligible shoreline length: 18,410'
Total project shoreline length: 19,375'
Percent elil!ible for State funding: 95.02%
State eligibility incorpomtes the total project length (critical and non.critical) and eligibility only recognizes publicly
accessible critically eroded shoreline.
'Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms.
-
lfiill!o"'twM
CAe August 12, 2010
VIII.3 New Business
12 of 36
t
~~.......
.....---
.......... ...........
..
':J;J
.....
-
__ 1.211I
-
l_~t_,."
CAe August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
13of36
t
-""""'-
tMIII....... ....
fIlwIr... ......
-
-
M-MIIl
....
I !
Doctors Pass
...
..,
,...
....
Gulf of
Mexico
....
...,
~
'"
,.~
,~
l...h~I.500_
CAG August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
14 of 36
-
"'PnljecIBound,f\B,
8kad1 HoleI, and R....OfI Condos
_ Publidy-OwlledProp"rty (BeKhA.....IS)
/'v'Crtlielll ElOllll'ln A'"
A FOEP Ml'InumelU
Collier County BNch
I..ong R.ng. Buch Plan
Nip". Segment
i
;;
.
mOM
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
150136
FY 2011-12 Local Government Funding Request
Project Name: South Marco Island Beach Renourishment
Project Description: This project includes the yearly physical beach monitoring, beach tilling,
and turtle/shorebird monitoring leading to beach nourishment and improved structures in
2012/2013. All the monitoring activities are required by the FDEP permit.
Marco Beach was restored in early winter 2007 using approximately 180,000 cubic yards of
hydraulic fill along with the maintenance of 4,500 feet ofOulf of Mexico shoreline along the
City of Marco Island. The project area was previously renourished in 1997. The same borrow
area from the 1997 project was used for the 2007 project, which was completed in March 2007.
The design project life for the recent nourishment is between six to eight years.
Project Location: The South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project is located on the
southwest Florida coastline of Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental
Protection monuments R-142 and beyond R-148to the terminal groin. The project is being
designed for the next nourishment with consideration for improving the existing structures.
Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FYI 1/12 will be used for annual
physical monitoring and turtle monitoring activities associated with the 2007 construction, and
design for the next nourishment.
Local Government Support
Does this sponsor have dedicated support staff whose sole priority is to manage beach erosion
control activities? Yes
Name Title Email Percent
Commitment
Gary McAlpin Director, Coastal Zone GaryMcAlpin@colliergov. 100%
Mana"ement net
Address 1: 330 t East Tamiami Trail Phone: 239-252-2966
W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite
103
Address 2: Naoles, Florida 34112 Fax: 239-252-2950
Quarterly Report Compliance:
Com Iiant
N
N
N
N
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII.3 New Business
160136
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - South Marco Island Beach Renourishment
How will revenue for the local funding cost share be established?
Local funding for the project will be obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development
Tax. This provides a dedicated long term funding source through a 'bed tax'. Collier County
levies a four (4%) percent Tourist Development Tax on all rental income received from
accommodations rented for six months or less.
Is the funding from a dedicated long term source for this project? Yes
Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Taxes to beach maintenance, including
funding projects within Marco Island. Collier County has a dedicated staff.
In order to acquire funding, a resolution from the local governmental entity must be
provided by the application deadline which declares:
. Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project
. Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor
. Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share
. Funding Source
Has the local sponsor resolution been attached to the application fulfilling all of these
requirements? Yes. it will be provided.
This project is detailed in Collier County's IO-year Capital Plan for Beach Projects which has
been approved by Collier County Board of County Commissioners.
A County Commission resolution specifically in support of this individual project is on file at
DEP offices.
Has the State cost-shared in a feasibility or design phase of this project?
Yes
Previous State Cost Share percentage
41.76%
to-Year Proiect Schedule and 5-Year Estimated Budl!et
Does this project have Congressional Authorization?
No
Does this project have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement?
No
What is the end date ofthe Federal Authorization?
n/a
Federal cost share available for this erosion control project: 75%
Marco Island Beach has FEMA Category G funds due to damage as a result of Tropical Storm
Fay. This has been included within the 5-year estimated budget under the Federal Cost Share
column at 75% of eligible cost.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIlI-3 New Business
17of36
Collier County
Long Range Budgel Plan
FY 11/12 - South Marco Island Beach Renourishmenl
Schedule and Budget (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for
5 years.):
Year
Proposed Description Total Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost
Method Estimated Cost Share Share Share
Monitoring $76,555 $57,416 $3,996 $15,142
Design $100,000 $75,000 $5,220 $19,780
$350,000 $0 $73,080 $276,920
Monitoring $77,386 $58,039 $4,040 $15,307
$2,700,000 $1,832,843 $181,062 $686,095
1,5 O. 00 0 13, 00 , 00
2011/2012
2012/2013
1
2014/2015
201 1201
2016/201
1
Length of Project Boundary in Feet:
6,560 It
Length of commercial or recreational property fronting the project shoreline:
2,740 It
Percentage of project shoreline designated as commercial or recreational property
41.76%
Eligibility:
Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments:
Project Boundary: 330' south ofRI42to 6()()' south ofRI48
Approximate Shoreline Length: 6,560'
Pu blic Access
Swallow Avenue
Parkin!! Suaces
70 (on site)
Oualifvin!! Hotels
Hilton Hotel
Radisson Hotel
OualilVin!! Shoreline
510'
350'
Area determined to be uubliclv accessible
330' north ofRI44 to 500' north ofRl45
20' north of Rl46to RI48
Total Len!!th
860'
1,880'
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
180136
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY I t/12 - South Marco Island Beach Renourishment
Area determined to be criticallv eroded
RI42+330toRI48+600
Total eligible shoreline length: 2,740'
Total project shoreline length: 6,560'
Percent eligible for State funding: 41.76%
State eligibility incorporales the total project length (critical and non-critical) and eligibility only recognizes pubticty
accessible critically eroded shoreline.
See attached map of eligible shorelines.
The Collier County occupational licenses and the Florida Department of Businesses and
Professional Regulation licenses for the following hotels are on file and can be provided if
required.
Additional Rankin!! Criteria
Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously- constructed project?
Yes
Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline? Yes
Rate of Erosion as determined by the Bureau based on long term data (ft/yr) 3.t ft/yr
Severity of Erosion:
A majority of the project area has been designated by FDEP as critically eroded. Marco Beach is
currently eroding at a rate of -II. 7 feet per year since January 2007.
Project Benefits:
2,740 linear feet (41.76%) of the Marco Island Beach property is zoned commercial or
recreational. This includes two hotels/resort condos and a public access point with parking
across the street.
Periodic dredging has taken place at Caxambas Pass. The total volume of sand dredged and
hydraulically pumped to the adjacent beach from Caxambas Pass since 1990 is estimated at
800,000 cubic yards.
Though Collier County has no federally designated sea turtle refuges, loggerhead sea turtles nest
throughout the county, and this project will enhance those opportunities. Beach tilling will
directly support turtle nesting by decreasing beach sand compaction.
GAG August 12, 2010
VlII.3 New Business
19 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY t 1/12 - South Marco Island Beach Renourishment
Use oflnnovative Applications of Existing Technologies:
Improvements to the combined breakwater and groin system at the south end of the project area
is being investigated for improvements to control sand being lost off the south end of the island.
Nourishment Interval (vears):
6-8
Project Performance:
Beach fill material was dredged from Caxambas Pass and placed between FDEP R-monuments
R-145 to R-148. Overall, approximately 176,000 cubic yards of sand were placed onto the
beaches of South Marco Island.
The project area has about 109 feet, or 75%, of beach width remaining since construction. Since
construction, the shoreline has lost approximately 36 feet of shoreline, which is equivalent to a
rate of -11.9 feet per year. The project area has retained its construction volume; however, the
profiles at the southern end of the project area have eroded while the profiles in the northern
section of the project area have accreted.
Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government'!
Explain? Yes
Collier County and the City of Marco Island are jointly sponsoring this project. The project
combines beach nourishment with inlet dredging. All county monitoring, including the two
cities, is combined for economy.
-
CAG August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
20 of 36
t
---
----
.......--~.
'ffl
.
1...~1Ii!ItI_
-
-
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
21 of 36
FY 2011-12 Local Government Funding Request
Proiect Name: Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Imolementation
Proiect Description: The project goal is to improve inlet navigation conditions without the use
of structures, and reduce erosion on adjacent beaches at Wiggins Pass, Collier County, FL. This
will be accomplished by straightening the inlet channel layout and modifYing bypassing. The
designated dredge disposal locations and quantities will be modified and relocated to increase
management flexibility, reduce sediment loss to the system and impacts to Barefoot Beach
shoreline. A dynamic design will be incorporated into the maintenance plan for the inlet so that
long-term dredging can be reduced. Impacts to natural resources will be avoided or minimized.
The goals for the Wiggins Pass navigation improvement study as developed by Collier County
and the Wiggins Pass Modeling Evaluation Work Group are:
I. To provide a safe channel for boating
2. To address erosion at Barefoot Beach
3. To lengthen the dredge cycle and accomplish it with the least effect on the
environment
4. To provide a solution that is economically effective
The project will be implemented in four phases. The phases include initial construction (Figure
I), major maintenance dredging, intermediate ebb channel dredging and monitoring, mitigation
and contingency plans. A Barefoot Beach restoration project is separate and will not be included
in this request. 11 will supplement bypassing proposed in this project.
Figure 1. Phase 1 of Construction
CAC August 12. 2010
VIII-3 New Business
22 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Implementation
There are five game changing facts recognized since the current plan for Wiggins Pass was
formulated in the 1990's that will be connected by the new plan:
I. The flood channel is migrating north significantly
2. Net alongshore transport is to the north
3. Insufficient bypassing is occurring to the north
4. The inlet and flood shoal are infilling from the south by a reoccurring sand wave
5. The rock ledge/ hard substrate extends to both sides ofthe channel
These facts are the basis for the new design proposed in Wiggins Pass Engineering Reports (Feb
2010), submitted as Attachment 33a of the JCP permit. An inlet management plan with
modeling and permit application is currently in progress.
The modeling studies (CPE 2009) indicate that improved navigation conditions and mitigation of
erosion on adjacent beaches can be achieved by redesigning the navigation channel and
modifying the placement location and quantity of the dredged material. The total initial cuI
volume estimate is 80,000 CY (Figure 1) and it will provide a prolonged maintenance interval.
The maintenance will include major maintenance dredging of approximately 45,000 CY each 4
years along with intermediate ebb (surgical) channel dredging of approximately 6,000 CY as
needed. This restoration will provide additional sand for bypassing to Barefoot Beach,
mitigating the historic erosion problem in this area. Periodic bypassing to Delnor Wiggins State
Park will be part of the plan.
A nourishment of Barefoot Beach is being considered as a separate project to restore the
shoreline and adjacent ebb shoal with a one time nourishment of 250,000 CY, supplementing this
plan. This project will help restore the sediment deficit to the north.
Project Location: The Wiggins Pass Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline in
Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments RI6 and
R17 and the project is adjacent to approximately 2300 feet of critically eroded Gulf shoreline.
Use of Reauested Prol!ram Funds: Funds requested for FYI I/]2 will be used for final design
and initial construction of the project.
Local Government Support
Does this sponsor have dedicated support staff whose sole priority is to manage beach erosion
control activities? Yes
Name Title Email Percent
Commitment
Gary McAlpin Director, Coastal Zone Gary MeA I pin@eolliergov. 100%
Management net
Address 1: 3301 East Tamiami Trail Phone: 239-252-2966
W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite
103
Address 2: Naoles, Florida 34112 Fax: 239-252-2950
CAC August 12. 2010
VIII-3 New Business
23 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Implementation
Quarterly Report Compliance:
None, this is an initial request.
Revenue for the local cost share will be Drovided bv: Local funding for the project will be
obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development Tax. This provides a dedicated long
term funding source through a 'bed tax'. Collier County levies a four (4%) percent Tourist
Development Tax on all rental income received from accommodations rented for six months or
less.
Is the funding from a dedicated long term source for this project? Yes
Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Taxes to beach maintenance, including
funding projects for inlet dredging that benefits adjacent shorelines. Collier County has a
dedicated staff.
In order to acquire funding, a resolution from the local governmental entity must be
provided by the application deadline which declares:
. Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project
. Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor
. Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share
. Funding Source
Has the local sponsor resolution been attached to the application fulfilling all of these
requirements? Yes. it will be Drovided
Previous State cost-share for a feasibility or desil!n/Dermittinl! Dhase of this Droiect:
The 1995 Inlet Management Plan was cost shared 50%. 50%
IO-Year Proiect Schedule and 5-Year Estimated Budl!et
Does this project have Congressional Authorization? No
Does this project have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement? No
What is the end date ofthe Federal Authorization? NA
Federal cost share available for this maintenance dredging project: NA
CAC August 12, 2010
Vlll~3 New Business
24 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11112 - Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Implementation
Schedule and Budget (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for
5 years.):
Year Proposed Description Total Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost
Method Estimated Cost Share Share Share
2011/2012 Design Model/Plan $250,000 $62,500
onstructton re gmg ,400,000 0,00
201212013 Design PI ans/Specs $100,000 $25,000
omtonng Phys 9,500
2013/2014 Construction Dredgin $300,000 $200,000 $100,000
Monitoring Phys $38,000 $28,500 $9,500
2014/2015 Design Plans/Specs $100,000 $75,000 $25,000
Momtonng ys 3 ,000 28,500 9,500
201512016 Construction Dredging $1,200.000 $0 $900,000 $300,000
Momtonng ys 3 , 0 ,500 ,500
omtonng ys
201 / omtonng ys
omtonng ys
omtonog ys
MaDDinl!- Mans are Drovided as attachments alon!! with ownershiD.
Length of Project Boundary in Feet: This is an Inlet Management Project, but public parks
stretch over a mile in either direction.
Length of commercial or recreational property fronting the project shoreline:
All adjacent shoreline is public park.
Percentage of project shoreline designated as commercial or recreational property
100%
Eligibility: Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments:
Adjacent beaches are Parks
Inlet/Additional Rankin!! Criteria
Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously- constructed project?
Yes
Beach Quality Sand
An estimate of the annual quantity of beach-quality sand reaching the updrift boundary of the
improved inlet channel. Estimated volume receiving I point per 10,000 CY with maximum of
10 points.
20,000 CY based on dredging records 2 Points
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII.3 New Business
25 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Implementation
Severity of Erosion
The severity of the erosion to the adjacent beaches caused by the inlet and the extent to which the
proposed project mitigates the erosive effects of the inlet. Severity of erosion for down drift area
of erosion calculated on average rate of erosion since 1972 at 2 points per foot with maximum of
10 points.
Down drift (RI4-RI6) erosion has averaged 6.1 ft/yr since 1978. 10 Points
Overall Significance and Anticipated Success
The overall significance and anticipated success of the proposed project in balancing the
sediment budget of the inlet and adjacent beaches and addressing the sand deficit along the inlet-
affected shoreline. Balancing the sediment budget: Divide the average shoreline recession since
1972 of adversely impacted beach by the average design width to be restored and maintained
multiplied by 10, for a maximum of 10 points.
Average shoreline recession of 6. I feet and an average design width to be restored of
15.6 feet. 3.9 Points
Bypassing Activities
The extent to which existing bypassing activities at an inlet would benefit from modest, cost-
effective improvements when considering the volumetric increases from the proposed project,
the availability of beach-quality sand currently not being bypassed to adjacent eroding beaches,
and the ease with which such beach-quality sand may be obtained. Cost effective alternatives:
Cost per CY to bypass before project improvements divided by cost per CY after multiplied by 5
for maximum of 10 points.
Increase 4,400 cy/yr 5 Points
Interest and Commitment of Local Governments
The interest and commitment of local governments as demonstrated by their willingness to
coordinate the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of an inlet management project
and their financial plan for funding the local cost-share for initial construction, ongoing sand
bypassing, channel dredging, and maintenance. Dedicated long term funding source for inlet
management: 5 points. Dedicated staff for beach and inlet management: 2 points. 75% or better
compliance and correct billings: 3 points.
8.5 Points
Previous Completion or Approval
The previous completion or approval of a state-sponsored inlet management plan or local-
government-sponsored inlet study concerning the inlet addressed by the proposed project, the
ease of updating and revising any such or study, and the adequacy and specificity of the plan's or
study's recommendations concerning the mitigation of an inlet's erosive effects on adjacent
beaches. The 1995 and Strategic Management Plan are the basis for current practices.
A new plan is in progress.
5 Points
CAC August 12, 2010
VIlI-3 New Business
26 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Implementation
Performance Enbancement
The degree to which the proposed project will enhance the performance and longevity of
proximate beach nourishment projects, thereby reducing the frequency of such periodic
nourishment projects. Increased nourishment interval estimated for down drift beach: 1 point per
year with maximum of 5 points.
2.0 Points
Proiect Benefits:
The project will attempt to reestablish the historic shoreline and the ebb shoal size. Also, Gopher
tortoises utilize Barefoot Beach for nesting purposes although none of the areas within the
project area have been designated as a turtle refuge.
Periodic dredging and bypassing has taken place at Wiggins Pass in recent decades. The total
volume of sand bypassed to adjacent beaches from maintenance dredging has been 498,650
cubic yards since 1984. Approximately 260,937 cubic yards of that fill has been placed to the
north, with the remaining 237,713 cubic yards being placed to the south of the inlet. The ratio
needs to be shifted to approximately 2.6: 1 in favor of the north.
Use of Innovative Aoolications of existinl! tecbnolol!ies:
Maintain natural alignment after implementation and use of intermediate (surgical) dredge events
to delay major dredge events.
Dredl!inl! Interval (vears):
1
Project Performance:
Wiggins Pass was designed to be dredged at regular intervals of approximately 3 to 4 years but is
currently dredged at regular intervals of approximately 2 years or less to maintain navigable
depths for recreational boaters. The dredge channel extends from the inlet throat to about 1,200
feet offshore. Periodic dredging has occurred at the intersection of the interior channels. The
inlet has been dredged since 1984 under two previous permits, secured by the County with a
local consultant.
Since maintenance dredging began in 1984, the overall erosion has increased along with the
magnitude of erosion experienced at beaches to the north. Intially, the beaches to the south were
erosional through the early 1990s. Since 1992, the shoreline north of the inlet at Barefoot Beach
has retreated on average approximately 87 feet. The worst area of erosion is occurring at R 16,
where, since 1992, it has lost approximately 437 feet of shoreline.
Overall, it appears that the current maintenance dredging practices are not properly addressing
the northern losses at Barefoot Beach nor the stability of the dredged channel. Historic reports
indicated that sediment transport was from north to south, and erosion was higher south of the
inlet between 1957 and 1979. However, the recent volumetric data contrasts with that belief.
From 1979 to 2009, the area north of Wiggins Pass (R11 to R 16) eroded 252,926 cubic yards,
while the area south of the inlet has accreted 49,603 cubic yards. Prior to 1979, before
maintenance dredging, the erosion accretion pattern was reversed, with the north accretional.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
27 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Wiggins Pass Intet Management Plan Implementation
Using these values along with the historic shoreline changes, it appears that more sand needs to
be disposed of at the north during maintenance dredging to reduce erosion on Barefoot Beach.
The amount of dredge disposal north and south of the inlet has been nearly equal since dredging
began in 1984. Lately, the trend is towards north disposal since 2001. An analysis was made to
calculate the disposal balance needed to make each area have an equal erosion rate. As an
example, the areas south of the inlet (R 17 to R21) showed a gain of almost 50,000 CY since
1979, while the area north of the inlet (R11to R16) lost 253,000 CY. To equalize the rate of
volumetric change in these areas since 1979, disposal volumes should have been 2.7 times
greater to the north (Barefoot Beach Park) than the south (Delnor Wiggins Park). This is a major
shift over past practices. Ultimately, this bypassing ratio should equalize stability of the
shoreline north and south ofthe inlet.
Navigation will be improved by straightening the channel through the flood and ebb shoal,
reducing the need for dredging. Boaters have difficulty finding the channel in the S-shape
natural alignment. The S-shape is caused by a long term natural process. Human engineering
factors are needed for improved channel design.
Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government?
Explain? No
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan Implementation
ATTACHMENT A
FUNDING ELIGIBILITY
Wi!!!!ins Pass Inlet Mana!!ement Plan ImDlementation
2009 Project Boundaries:
Project Boundary: R 16 south of R I 7
Public Access
Oelnor Wiggins State Recreation Area'
Barefoot Beach
On-site
SDaces
340
100+
Area determined to be Dubliclv accessible
Both adjacent shorelines
Area determined to be criticallv eroded
RI4 to R16,3
Fundin!! Rate:
75% for 1MI'
Adjacent
Snaces
o
CAe August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
28 of 36
Total
Spaces
340
100+
. .
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
29 of 36
.....
~~
~"-'----:-_.'~'\iI[~~~i'
1IilIIOL*'"
~~;""""..
~MH
"""'0WiWli I!:'MioiI~,""""
It, PtaP........
-
Ite--.aiMF_lNINNim."~
...1i'IlII6t~~lONI:ZMl>;
HuI\I.~J:MIiloM1Il!'~'_~
1.D.-Iiil'.MiWP'!IM;IiIltllllllfllj: _ttN
t.iI"aHiip~;"'I~IiMItMIf,tmN
"'NIINI~~~II'"
CdiiW~;_~_
\
c.n..-~IIMGI!I
lMI=-=PIIiIII
UMIi.' .. - .flWI~IlId111l,1
... "M
,-
11111l.1l.-1__
~
-
-
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
30 of 36
FY 2011-12 Local Government Fnnding Request
Project Name: Barefoot Beach Restoration Proiect
Project Description:
The Barefoot Beach project area, which is located between Rl4 and RI6.3, will be restored using
sand from an offshore borrow area, Tl. The level of restoration will be determined during final
design and compliment sand bypassed from the Wiggins Pass dredging project. The restoration
project will used approximately 250,000 cubic yards to restore the shoreline and the adjacent ebb
shoal. Based on modeling, beach placement closer to the inlet will have the greatest impact
toward restoring Barefoot Beach. The disposal shape will be determined by modeling and
complimentary engineering and design studies. Past disposal practices placed dredged material
where it creates a sediment deficit within a Yo mile north of the inlet's vicinity.
Project Location: The Barefoot Beach Restoration Project is located on the southwest Florida
coastline in Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection
monuments R-14 and R-16.3, downdrift and adjacent to Wiggins Pass. The project consists of
approximately 0.45 miles of critically eroded Gulf shoreline.
Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FYI 1/12 will be used for final design
and construction.
Local Government Support
Does this sponsor have dedicated support staff whose sole priority is to manage beach erosion
control activities? Yes
Name Title Email Percent
Commitment
Gary McAlpin Director, Coastal Zone GaryMcAlpin@colliergov. 100%
Management net
Address 1: 330 I East Tamiarni Trail Phone: 239-252-2966
W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite
103
Address 2: Nanles, Florida 34112 Fax: 239-252-2950
Quarterly Report Compliance:
This is an initial funding request for this project.
CAC August 12, 2010
Vlll~3 New Business
31 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11112 - Barefoot Beach Restoration Project
Revenue for the local cost share will be provided by: Local funding for the project will be
obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development Tax. This provides a dedicated long
term funding source through a 'bed tax'. Collier County levies a four (4%) percent Tourist
Development Tax on all rental income received from accommodations rented for six months or
less.
Is the funding from a dedicated long term source for this project? Yes
Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Taxes to coastal projects, including
funding inlet projects that benefit adjacent beaches. Collier County has a dedicated staff.
In order to acquire funding, a resolution from the local governmental entity must be
provided by the application deadline which declares:
. Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project
. Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor
. Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share
. Funding Source
Has the local sponsor resolution been attached to the application fulfilling all of these
requirements? Yes. it will be provided
This project is detailed in Collier County's 10-year Capital Plan for Beach Projects which has
been approved by Collier County Board of County Commissioners.
Previous State cost-share for a feasibility or design/permitting phase ofthis project:
Initial request
Previous State Cost Share percentage
Initial request
to-Year Proiect Schedule and S-Year Estimated Budl!et
Does this project have Congressional Authorization?
No
Does this project have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement?
No
What is the end date of the Federal Authorization?
n/a
Federal cost share available for this erosion control project:
0%
CAC August 12, 2010
VIIl.3 New Business
32 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Barefoot Beach Restoration Project
Schedule and Budget (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for
5 years.):
Year Proposed Method Description Total Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost
Estimated Cost Share Share Share
11 easl I tty ouns ment
2012/2013 Desi n & Pennittin Nourishment $100,000 $0
onstructlOn ouns menL 10,000, 0 0
14
14 oOltormg YSIC
I 01 oOltormg YSlca
1
Length of Project Boundary in Feet:
2.363 ft
Length of commercial or recreational property fronting the project shoreline:
Barefoot Beach Park 2.363 ft
Percentage of project shoreline designated as commercial or recreational property
100%
Eligibility: Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments:
See Attachment] for detailed listing and attached maps.
No occupational licenses or Florida Department of Businesses and Professional Regulation
licenses are included since the project area is a state and county owned, county operated
recreational area.
Additional Rankin!! Criteria
Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously- constructed project?
Yes
No
6.1 ft/vr
Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline?
Rate of Erosion as determined by the Bureau based on long term data (ftlyr)
Severity of erosion:
The entire portion of the project area has been designated by FDEP as critically eroded. The area
near R16 is currently experiencing the most severe erosion rate in the project area, losing an
average of 13.9 ft/yr or 418 feet since 1978. The second largest erosion within the project area
occurred directly north at R15. This area has lost 143 feet of shoreline at a rate of -4.8 feet per
year since 1978. The erosion rate for the total project area is approximately 6.1 feet per year
CAC August 12,2010
VIII-3 New Business
33 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY I t/12 - Barefoot Beach Restoration Project
over a 30 year time period. The stable condition of RI4 to the north has helped to reduce the
shoreline erosion rate within the project area.
Project Benefits:
Shoreline development within the project area consists of approximately 2,360 linear feet of
publicly accessible beach. The entire portion of the project area is recreational and habitat. The
attached maps identify public beach access points with associated parking spaces within the
project area.
Gopher tortoises utilize the entire project area for nesting purposes although none of the areas
within the project area have been designated as a turtle refuge. The nourishment will initiate
restoration of lost habitat.
Periodic dredging and bypassing has taken place at Wiggins Pass in recent decades. The total
volume of sand bypassed to adjacent beaches from maintenance dredging has been 498,650
cubic yards since 1984. Approximately 260,937 cubic yards of that fill has been placed to the
north, with the remaining 237,713 cubic yards being placed to the south of the inlet. This project
will fill the gap where sand is not spreading naturally and supplement the bypassing operations
and will replace deficits started in the 1980s, which will mitigate for past inlet impacts.
Use ofInnovative Applications of existing technologies:
Geographic computer modeling will be utilized to identify the most beneficial region to place the
restoration fill. A multi-stage recovery will be implemented in order to restore the eroding
shoreline along with restoring the ebb shoal in order to alleviate erosion at Barefoot Beach,
without severe impacts to navigation.
Nourishment Interval (vears):
Q
Project Performance:
The shorelines near Wiggins Pass have been eroding at an accelerated rate since the I 990s,
which directly affects the amount of recreational area available to the public. During the period
from 1992 to 2009, the largest shoreline retreat was observed at R-16 with over 400 feet of
shoreline lost. Approximately 10 acres has been lost from the Gulf beaches since 1992. The
shoreline recession on South Barefoot Beach has caused vegetation to be lost, and it has also
created a dangerous scarp along the shoreline that is hazardous to park users. Along with the
loss of vegetation, walking paths that were present in 1973 at Barefoot Beach have been eroded
away and are no longer present in several areas to the west and south.
In comparison to the shoreline changes, the volumetric changes also indicate that the shoreline
north of Wiggins Pass is trending to become highly erosional. From 1885 to 1979, the shoreline
north of Wiggins Pass was overall accreational for approximately 100 years. After 1979 to
present, the shoreline shifted and is now in a state of erosion. The worst of the erosion is seen at
R-16 where approximately 201,000 cubic yards have been lost. This erosion has caused the
southern tip of South Barefoot Beach to nearly shear off, which in return has lost valuable
recreational area and habitat within the park.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIJl-3 New Business
34 of 36
Collier County
Long Range Budget Pt,n
FY 11/12 - Barefoot Beach Restoration Project
The restoration is scheduled for FY 2012/2013, but may need to be flexible to agency desires and
the schedule for Wiggins Pass. As such, it is not tied to one of these projects.
Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government?
Explain? Yes
This project will be built to compliment the Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan and the Collier
County Nourishment Project, where feasible. Monitoring of all Collier County Coastal projects
is consolidated for economy - including both physical and biological monitoring and the sea
turtle nesting program. The two coastal cities and county share this effort.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIlI.3 New Business
35 of 36
CoHier County
Long Range Budget Plan
FY 11/12 - Barefoot Beach Restoration Project
ATTACHMENT!
FUNDING ELIGIBILITY
COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT
Project Boundary: RI4 to 300' south ofRI6
Approximate Shoreline Length: 2,360'
Public Access
Barefoot Beach Preserve-
Delnor Wiggins State Recreation Area.
On-site
SDaces
100+
340
Adjacent
Spaces
100+
o
Total
Spaces
200+
340
Area determined to be publiclv accessible
Rl4to 300' south ofRI6
Total Lenl!th
2,360'
Area determined to be criticallv eroded
RI4 to R16.3
Total eligible shoreline length: 2,360'
Total project shoreline length: 2,360'
State owned shoreline length:
County owned shoreline length:
2,260'
100'
Percent elillible for State funding: 100.0%
State eligibility incorporates the total project length (critical and non-critical) and eligibility only recognizes publicly
accessible critically eroded shoreline.
.Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms.
CAC August 12, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
36 of 36
.-
"'1IH'l'~~
8: ."~DwII<<I~~-'-M.'
....I'JMIi.Mt
Nt;Mtli&!lD~""""",
.. R!D'~I
-
l,~d,~'ll@ii!!ll'liMl;Ifl.l!--
_1PliN~:~~~
__~tHUII.~'iiI#_~
~,~~i\DaI~::Ii(,""
*'N;iIII:ItOW!fllll~Rl~lo!IIMH
.... 1lIurd:C:,",** J;."::M
~~- ....
t
CINIII!'~"""
--~;. --
......................
.., -
:-:-~,-
'M<l'~"'"
~
--