DSAC Backup 07/21/2010DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
MEETING
BACKUP
DOCUMENTS
JULY 21, 2010
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
* *REVISED **
July 21, 2010
3:00 p.m.
Conference Room 610
NOTICE:
Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts
the time. Speakers are required to fill out a "Speaker Request Form," list the topic they wish to address, and
hand it to the Staff member seated at the table before the meeting begins. Please wait to be recognized by the
Chairman, and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation before commenting. During
discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker.
Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please leave the room
to conduct any personal business. All parties participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules
of Order, and wait to be recognized by the Chairman. Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the
Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made.
I. Call to Order - Chairman
Approval of Agenda
III. Approval of Minutes from June 2, 2010 Meeting
IV. Public Speakers
V. Staff Announcements /Updates
A. Public Utilities Division Update — Nathan Beals
B. Fire Review Update — Ed Riley
C. Growth Management Division/Transportation Planning — Mike Greene
D. Growth Management Division /Planning & Regulation Update — Nick Casalanguida — (to discuss drawings
accompanying permit applications must be done by a surveyor or other professional)
VI. Old Business
A. Impact Fee update & Indexing — [Amy Patterson]
B. Fire Service RPZs and Line -Size water meters requirement review — [Nathan Beals]
VII. New Business
A. None
VIII. Committee Member Comments — Mileage reimbursement for Board members
IX. Adjourn
Next Meetinq Dates
August 4, 2010 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm
September 1, 2010 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm
October 6, 2010 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm
November 3, 2010 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm
December 1, 2010 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm
June 2, 2010
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, June 2, 2010
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Development Services
Advisory Committee, having conducted business herein, met on this date at
3:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room #610, Collier County
Growth Management Division/Planning & Regulation, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive,
Naples, Florida, with the following Members present:
CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Vice Chair: David Dunnavant
Ray Allain
James Boughton
Clay Brooker (Excused)
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn
Dalas Disney
Marco Espinar
Blair Foley
Regan Henry
George Hermanson
David Hurst
Reed Jarvi
Robert Mulhere
Mario Valle
ALSO PRESENT: Judy Puig, Operations Analyst — Staff Liaison
Phil Gramatges, Interim Director, Public Utilities
Jamie French, Director, Operations
Bill Lorenz, Director, Land Development Services
Susan Istenes, AICP, Manager, Special Projects
Diane Flagg, Director, Code Enforcement
Gary Harrison, Building Official
Robert Wiley, Principal Project Mgr., Watershed Study Project /FEMA
June 2, 2010
I. Call to Order:
Chairman William Varian called the meeting to order at 3:04 PM and read the
procedures to be followed during the meeting.
II. Approval of Agenda:
Marco Espinar moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Robert Mulhere.
Carried unanimously, 12 -0.
III. Approval of Minutes — May 5, 2010 Meeting:
Dalas Disney moved to approve the Minutes of the May S, 2010 meeting as submitted.
Second by Reed Jarvi. Carried unanimously, 12 -0.
(Laura Spurgeon DeJohn arrived at 3:07 PM.)
IV. Public Speakers:
(None)
V. Growth Management Division Staff Announcements/Updates:
A. Public Utilities Division Update — Phil Gramatges, Interim Director
• A number of projects have been delayed over the past two years
o $29M will be requested for New Projects in the Capital Budget for
Fiscal Year 2011
o Carryover from F/Y 2010 is anticipated ($60 - $70M)
• There is a staff shortage in Planning & Project Management — initially two
Principal Project Managers and two Senior Project Managers were needed
o One Senior Project Manager and one Principal Project Manager have
been hired
• Recruiting for the position of Director — Mr. Gramatges is retiring (July 15)
B. Fire Review Update — Ed Riley, Fire Code Official
• Monthly Report was submitted — Committee's information packet
• Percentage of First Reviews Approved — 35%
Chairman Varian stated the percentage appeared to be very low.
C. Transportation Planning Section Update — Michael Greene, Transportation
Planning Manager
• No report
D. Planning and Regulation Update — Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator
• No report
VI. Old Business:
(None)
June 2, 2010
VII. New Business:
B. Growth Management Fee Schedule Updates — Bill Lorenz, Director - Land
Development Services and Diane Flagg, Director — Code Enforcement
(A copy of the Memorandum dated May 26, 2010 was distributed to the Committee.)
• Proposed changes: Inspection Fees and Code Enforcement Fees
• Current policy: 100% of Inspection Fees are collected at application
o Proposed change: collect 50% at application and balance at the Pre -
Construction Meeting
• Fees are non - refundable
(George Hermanson arrived at 3:13 PM)
• The Fee Schedule will be reviewed on a quarterly basis to determine if changes
should be made
The Fee Schedule Resolution will be presented to the Board of County
Commissioners on June 22, 2010
Questions:
(1) "Why collect Inspection Fees before the project comes to fruition ?"
• Inspectors must be on staff (trained) before projects begin and fees help to
maintain staff
(2) "Why not collect balance at another point in the process?
(3) "Why not collect 50% at Pre - Construction Meeting and balance at turnover or at
acceptance of preliminary utilities ?"
(4) "Have you considered collecting a smaller percentage? Why 50 % ?"
(5) "What was the origin of the 2.25% -- why was that figure chosen ?"
Concern was expressed if the fees are paid and the project stalls, there is no opportunity
for a refund.
Suggestion: The policy should be re- examined to provide some recourse for a refund.
It was noted fees are currently refundable on a case -by -case basis.
Mr. Lorenz stated a request can be made for a refund and it is presented to the Board
of County Commissioners for approval. He further stated if a project changes, the
probable estimated costs will be revised.
Diane Flagg presented revisions to "EE) Failure to Obtain a Permit"
Background: The Board of County Commissioners is seeking compliance with Code
Enforcement regulations rather than strict assessment of fines. When a violation is
abated, fines have been waived after the hard costs (i.e., operational or abatement costs
incurred by the County) are paid. The Waiver Request is presented to the BCC on
behalf of the individual and the BCC determines whether or not to approve it.
Revisions:
• In Section 1, when work is started without obtaining a permit, the fee is 2x the
regular fee which is consistent with the Building Code.
June 2, 2010
• In Sections 2, 3, and 4, if the property owner obtains compliance, the fee will
be assessed at the regular rate. However, a contractor will be charged 2x the
regular fee since the contractor should have knowledge of the regulations.
• In Section 5, the date was changed from April 30, 1997 to April 1, 1997.
Section 5 is based upon an existing Ordinance that was largely ignored in the
past. If a property owner can provide a "preponderance of evidence" that the
structure in question was built prior to April 1, 1997 and in compliance with the
Codes existing at that time, then a permit will be issued without a fee.
There was a discussion concerning the County's responsibility regarding record
keeping. It was noted Record Department moved several times and there was a flood
that contributed to the County's inability to locate documentation prior to April 1,
1997.
• A series of flow charts have been drafted to assist Staff to determine an
Affirmative Defense may be applied to the case. Other processes include
Permit by Affidavit and After- the -Fact Permit.
• Code Enforcement Investigators are required to walk property owners through
the process and assist them with research to obtain a resolution.
Gary Harrison, Building Official, explained the process, i.e., an Inspector will be
sent to the property and the homeowner will remove whatever is necessary (dry wall or
receptacles, etc.) to determine the age of construction.
Jamie French stated the goal was to obtain consistency in the language based on
directions from the BCC and management. Currently a homeowner will pay 4 times
the fee to obtain an After- the -Fact Permit while a contractor will be only 2 times the
fee. If a homeowner is voluntarily complying, they would not be charged a fee.
Further revisions may be necessary to specify that the homeowner must make the
property easily accessible. lie noted Florida Building Codes will be observed.
There was an objection to the term "preponderance" as a qualifier and it was suggested
to strike the word.
Mr. French stated the language was taken directly from the Ordinance.
[Definition: Preponderance of the Evidence: A standard of proof that must be met by
a Plaintiff if he /she is to win a civil action.
• The greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non - criminal) lawsuit for
the Trier of'Fact (jury or Judge without a jury) to decide in favor of'one side or
the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and
its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence.
Preponderance of the evidence is required in a civil case while -beyond a reasonable
doubt" is the more severe test of evidence required to convict in a criminal trial.]
June 2, 2010
Jamie French answered the questions posed earlier:
• Regarding the 2.25 percentage, he will order a Fee Study to see if this is the
correct number and return with the results.
Regarding the 50% Fee Split, the split was proposed to assist the developer
who would benefit from having less cash to produce at the beginning of the
project. The 50% that is retained enables the County to retain licensed
professionals on staff.
Regarding the non - refundable payments, the County Attorney's Office has
concurred it is implied all fees within the Fee Schedule are non - refundable.
Contractors have the right to appeal to the Board of County Commissioners for
a refund and the Board can grant refunds on a case -by -case basis.
He stated if a fee is collected in error, a refund will be provided. If the scope of the
project changes, the fees can be adjusted. Staff does not have the ability to make any
changes to the Fee Schedule or to authorize a refund without BCC approval.
Robert Mulhere moved to recommend approving the changes to the Fee Schedule
while requesting Staff clarify the process by which a refund, in general, might be
obtained. Second by Mario Valle.
A suggestion was made to amend the Motion to add inserting the phrase "unless
otherwise granted by the Board of County Commissioners" at the end of each
paragraph under "EE — Failure to Obtain a Permit. "
Robert Mulhere amended the Motion to include the suggested language. Second by
Mario Valle. Carried unanimously, 14 -0.
A. Presentation: Administrative Code — Susan Istenes, AICP, Manager - Special
Projects
(Copies of the Table of Contents /Introductory Chapter and the Conditional Uses
Procedures were distributed to the Members.)
Ms. Istenes stated a draft of the Administrative Code has been completed and is in
review. She explained the "Administrative Code" is, in essence, an Administrative
Procedures Manual.
• Currently, all administrative procedures are part of the Land Development
Code along with Development Regulations.
• The majority of the procedures and processes are located in Chapter 10 of
the LDC and the language from the Chapter has been inserted into the
Administrative Code, re- organized and reformatted.
• The consultant reviewed the LDC and made suggestions regarding moving
items within the LDC (for better organization) and moving portions of the LDC
into the Code of Laws and Ordinances. For example, the Conditional Uses
Procedures has been moved to the Administrative Code.
• The approval process will include amending the LDC, the Administrative Code
and the Code of Laws and Ordinances.
June 2, 2010
• The full document, including revisions, will be provided to DSAC and other
Advisory Committees prior to presenting to the Board of County
Commissioners for approval.
Errors /Typos noted:
• The abbreviation for Development Services Advisory Committee is DSAC, not
DRAC
• Historic /Archaeological Preservation Board is the correct name for the
Committee, not "Historical"
A suggestion was made to cross - reference the criteria and factual data used to make
decisions regarding a Conditional Use in the LDC.
Ms. Istenes suggested dividing the adoption process into phases: the first phase was
drafting the Administrative Code. The second phase will be to review of the contents,
processes and procedures.
Consensus: To go forward with the work and the suggested adoption process.
VIII. Committee Member Comments:
(1) David Hurst
Topic: Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
• Questioned who may become a member of the Floodplain Management
Planning Committee
Robert Wiley stated membership consists of citizens (50 %), Staff (50 %) in addition to
a position for one representative from the City of Marco Island, the City of Naples and
Everglades City, if the municipalities chose to participate. There is currently one
vacancy. The meetings are noticed and open to the public.
Chairman Varian noted the Ordinance prohibits anyone from the Industry from
applying for membership.
Mr. Wiley stated the next meeting for the Floodplain Management Planning
Committee is July 121n
Mr. Hurst stated there are consultants who would like to voice their concerns and
suggested scheduling a meeting with Mr. Wiley. It was noted only Mr. Hurst could
attend as a representative of DSAC in order to avoid a conflict with the Sunshine
Laws.
Mr. Wiley asked the Committee members to send their comments regarding the draft
of the Ordinance distributed at the last DSAC meeting. He noted FEMA considers the
entire County as a "Coastal Community" within the flood insurance program.
(4: 40 PM — George Hermanson left)
Chairman Varian reminded the members to send their comments to Judy who will
forward them to Mr. Wiley.
(2) David Hurst requested an Update to the Road Impact Fees and asked to add that topic
to the next Agenda and for Amy Patterson to appear and explain.
June 2, 2010
Next Meeting Dates:
July 7, 2010 — 3:00 PM
August 4, 2010 — 3:00 PM
September 1, 2010 — 3:00 PM
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned
by order of the Chairman at 4:50 PM.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
William Varian, Chairman
The Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee on
as presented , or as amended
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS MANUAL
TABLE OF REVISIONS
SINCE SEPTEMBER 2009 UPDATE
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES PLANNING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
AS OF 06/30/10
The following pages are a summary of changes to the Collier County
Utilities Standards Manual since the September 29, 2009 Board of
County Commissioners (BCC) approval of Resolution 2009 -224. The
changes will be taken to the BCC for approval by Resolution in
September 2010.
Page 1 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS MANUAL
TABLE OF REVISIONS TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
SINCE SEPTEMBER 2009 UPDATE
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES PLANNING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
AS OF 06/30/10
CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS — SECTION 2
Additions to text from Section 2 are shown in bold print, and deletions are shown with strike - through.
Section
Sub-
Location
Revision
Date
Section
2
331200
Water Valves
2.3.F. Tapping Valves and Sleeves
06/15/10
and
Appurtenances
1. All tapping sleeve and valve assemblies shall meet
the requirements of AWWA Standard C500, latest revision.
Cast iron tapping sleeves or stainless steel wrap- around
sleeves, and cast iron valves shall be used to make live taps
into the existing water mains where shown on the drawings.
Sleeve bodies must be of stainless steel. The Flanges must
conform to AWWA C207 Class D ANSI 150# drilling.
Mechanical Joint (MJ) tapping sleeves are also
acceptable. All bolts and nuts shall be as specified.
Page 2 of 4
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS MANUAL
TABLE OF REVISIONS TO STANDARDS DETAILS
SINCE SEPTEMBER 2009 UPDATE
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES PLANNING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
AS OF 06/30/10
CHANGES TO UTILITIES DETAIL DRAWINGS - SECTION 3
Section
Detail #
Revision
Date of Approval
3
W -3
Clarify water main and service line pipe diameter as 6" minimum
las required by the LDC.
06/15/10
Page 3 of 4
PROVIDE A 3" DIAMETER BRASS DISC ANCHORED
IN CONCRETE COLLAR. DISC SHOULD PROVIDE
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: SIZE OF MAIN;
NUMBER OF TURNS TO OPEN; DIRECTION TO
TURN TO OPEN; VALVE MANUFACTURER AND
YEAR VALVE INSTALLED
CURB, GUTTER, 7' -6
CONTRACTOR
SHALL CONTACT
° BREAKAWAY
PAVEMENT SEE
LOCAL FIRE
DISTRICT
FOR PAINT
18"
x 18" x 6" CONCRETE COLLAR
COLOR AND
HYDRANT
2' -0"
(2)
#4 BARS CONTINUOUS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
CONCRETE BREAK
MINIMUM
/
(4)
#4 BARS DIAGONAL
' "
MAXIMUM
RADIUS
/-RIGHT—OF—WAY
LINE OR
REQUIRED
OR PIPE SHALL NOT BEAR ON
, ll
I SIDEWALK
CURB, GUTTER, 7' -6
TRAFFIC
OR EDGE OF MINIMUM
° BREAKAWAY
PAVEMENT SEE
00
FLANGE
PLANS
` co
6" THICK x
TWO PIECE CAST IRON VALVE
�fi 24" SQUARE
BOX WITH DR 18 PVC PIPE
j o
CONCRETE BREAK
EXTENSION IF NEEDED
/
SLAB WITH
(C -900 DR 14 PVC PIPE
#4 BARS AS
IN PAVED AREAS). VALVE BOX
REQUIRED
OR PIPE SHALL NOT BEAR ON
VALVE OR WATER MAIN
SUPPLY WITHOUT
DRAIN OR PLUG
6" MINIMUM WATER MAIN
6" MINIMUM
DRAIN OPENING
HY DRANT
HYDRANT TEE
DIAMETER DR 18
PVC PIPE (C -900
BEFORE
OR TAP
DR 14 PVC PIPE
INSTALLATION
NOTES:
IN PAVED AREAS)
MJ RETAINER GLANDS (TYP)
1. HYDRANT MUST BE CURRENT YEAR MANUFACTURE AND YEAR OF MANUFACTURE MUST BE
CAST ON BARREL.
2. ALL EXISTING MAINS WHERE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED SHALL BE HOT TAPPED.
3. TAPPING SADDLES MAY BE EITHER STAINLESS STEEL OR DUCTILE IRON. ALL TAPPING
SADDLES FOR ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL.
4. ALL FIRE HYDRANT BARRELS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 5 -1/4" IN DIAMETER.
5. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS INSTALLED SHALL BE OF THE BREAK AWAY FLANGE TYPE AND SHALL
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT.
6. HYDRANT SHALL CONFORM WITH AWWA C -502.
7. THRUST RESTRAINT SHALL BE BY MJ RETAINER GLANDS.
8. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO
NSF STANDARD 61.
FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL W -3
NTS REVISED: JUNE 2010
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS MANUAL
TABLE OF REVISIONS TO APPENDICES
SINCE SEPTEMBER 2009 UPDATE
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES PLANNING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
AS OF 06/30/10
CHANGES
TO APPENDICES
— SECTION 4
Section
Sub - Section
Location
Revision
Date
4
Appendix A
All
Combine Water and Wastewater Deviation Forms into one.
11/17/09
4
Appendix G
Pagel
Update list.
03/16/10
Page 4 of 4
DEVIATION INFORMATION SHEET
Any request for a deviation from an established Wastewater or Water Department procedure
must be submitted on the Utility Deviation Form and include all the required information for a
faster and more efficient process. Please deliver your request to the Planning and Project
Management Department Offices listed above, business hours are 8:00 am — 5:00 pm, M -F.
Please maintain one deviation per form and select the appropriate type of deviation
(Wastewater, Water, or IQ Water). Ensure to select whether the deviation is on a Privately
Owned or County Owned system. Multiple forms may be attached to the two sets of required
blue print or drawing that has the area(s) of interest highlighted for quick referencing.
Provide as much information as possible along with the required Site Development Plan
Number (obtained from the Engineer of the Developer). Please include any and all equipment
specification information, pressures and velocities of flows, or other pertinent documentation
and a cover letter to give additional information that may not be addressed on the form.
For Grease Trap Deviations, please include a cover letter giving any relevant information
regarding the kitchen and its use, a copy of the Menu of what is to be cooked and served and a
blue print of the floor plan for the kitchen and seating area.
Upon receipt of you deviation request the processing procedure begins with a date stamp and
routing form. The first review is with the Locates Department for verification that the deviation
request is located within the Collier County Water or Wastewater Service Areas. Next,
depending on the topic of your request, the routing will either be to the Wastewater
Pretreatment Inspector, Wastewater Collection Staff, or Water Distribution Staff and Public
Utilities Planning and Project Management Staff for review. At any time there may be a site visit.
The director of the Water or Wastewater Department performs the final review and you will
thereafter be notified by email or phone of the outcome of your deviation request. If the
deviation is denied, a meeting may be requested with the appropriate Director and staff to
discuss.
If you have any question regarding this procedure, please call (239) 252 -2583.
11/2009
UTILITY DEVIATION FORM
Petitioners Request
Date: ❑ Wastewater
REQUIRED - Site Development Plan # (SDP #)
Project Name:
Project Address:
Petitioners Name & Business Name:
Business Address:
Phone # Fax # E m
Reason for request?
How does this request differ from Ordinance?
Impact of this request on affected area?
❑ Water ❑ IQ Water
- or- Subdivision Improvement #(PPL #)
ail
Impact of this request on the maintenance of the system?
❑ Privately Owned [] County Owned
REQUIRED FORMS
For all Deviation Request
unless specified
El Blue Prints / Site Drawings
El Detail Specifications
11 Menu & Seating only for
Grease Trap Deviations
❑ Cover Letter
w/ Pertinent Information
Explain benefits this request will have to the operation /maintenance of the Collier County Utility system:
Additional Comments:
Copy to: Engineering Review 11/2009
Public Utilities Administrator
COUNTY STAFF ONLY
Routing for Review:
(initials) Staff Comments:
Stake & Locates
Approve:
Disapprove:
WW Pretreatment Inspector
Approve:
Disapprove:
WW Laboratory Supervisor
Approve:
Disapprove:
WW Collections Manager
Approve:
Disapprove:
Water Distribution Manager
Approve:
Disapprove:
IQ Water Manager
Approve:
Disapprove:
Planning & Project Mgmt. Dept.
Approve:
Disapprove:
W or WW Department Director
Approve:
Disapprove:
Authorizing Signature:
Date:
Collier County Utility Director
Copy to: Engineering Review 11/2009
Public Utilities Administrator
Fire Plan Review - Time Frame Summary
May -10
Number Number Average # of 1st % of tat Percentages
of of Time in Reviews Reviews Within Time
Reviews Days Days Approved Approved Frames
Architectural Reviews
Total
624
789
1.51
1st Review
367
639
1.74
279
76%
100/10 Days
6 Day Max
2nd Review
125
116
0.93
100/3 Days
3rd Review
26
27
1.04
100/3 Days
4th Review
4
6
1.50
100/3 Days
6th Review
2
1
0.50
100/3 Days
Total 2 -6 Reviews
157
150
0.96
100/3 Days
3 Day Max
Fire Sprinkler Reviews
64
71
1.11
Total
let Review
38
49
1.29
19
60%
100/10 Days
6 Day Max
2nd Review
22
19
0.86
100/3 Days
3rd Review
4
3
0.75
100/3 Days
Total 2 -3 Reviews
26
22
0.85
100/3 Days
2 Day Max
Underground Reviews
11
16
1.36
Total
1st Review
8
13
1.63
6
75%
100110 Days
3 Day Max
2nd Review
3
2
0.67
100/3 Days
Total 2nd Review
3
2
0.67
100/3 Days
1 Day Max
Fuel & LP Gas Reviews
13
16
1.23
Total
1st Review
9
11
1.22
9
100%
100/10 Days
2 Day Max
2nd Review
4
5
1.25
100/3 Days
Total 2nd Review
4
5
1.25
100/3 Days
3 Day Max
Hood & FSUP Reviews
13
17
1.31
Total
1st Review
12
16
1.33
7
68%
100/10 Days
3 Day Max
2nd Review
1
1
1.00
100/3 Days
Total 2nd Review
1
1
1.00
100/3 Days
1 Day Max
Fire Alarm Reviews
Total
118
128
1.08
1st Review
79
98
1.24
54
68%
100/10 Days
3 Day Max
2nd Review
31
25
0.81
100/3 Days
3rd Review
4
3
0.75
100/3 Days
4th Review
3
1
0.33
100/3 Days
5th Review
1
1
1.00
100/3 Days
Total 2 -6 Reviews
39
30
0.77
100/3 Days
2 Day Max
Summary
1st Review
613
826
1.61
374
73%
100/10 Days
Corrections
230
210
0.91
10013 Days
Overall Totals
743
1036
1.39
Office of the Fire Code Official
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
Office of the Fire Code Official
Summary of Plan Review Activity
May -10
Architectural Reviews
524
Sprinkler Reviews
54
Underground Reviews
11
Fuel & LP Gas Reviews
13
Hoods & FSUP Reviews
13
Alarm Reviews
118
SDP Reviews
30
Total # of Plans Reviewed
773
Number of Work Days
20
Average # of Plans Reviewed per Day
39
ASAP Reviews per Building Department:
4 Architectural Fast Track
8 Low Voltage
2 Tents
Total # of ASAP Reviews *:
14
Total ASAP Reviews per Day
1
*Overtime Reviews are not included in this figure
Scheduled Meetings/Hours:
Ed:
49.25 Hrs.
Bob:
16.50 Hrs.
Jackie:
1.91 Hrs.
Ricco:
53.25 Hrs.
Maggie:
7.00 Hrs.
Classes and Seminars attended by FCO:
Participant
5/4 Hood Webinar from Captive Aire -1.25 hrs
Jackie de la Osa
5/5 -5/6 Firefighter Olympics, Tampa
Ricco Longo
5/11 Emergency Lighting & Exit Sign -2 hrs, Ft. Myers
Jackie de la Osa
5/19 Disaster Planning Seminar, Ft. Myers
Ed Riley & Linda Rutkoski
5/20 CPR Class -4 hrs., ENFD Station 20
Robert Salvaggio
Total Overtime Hours for the Fire Code Office
*Overtime Hours Reimbursed by Contractors
In addition to the above - mentioned tasks, The Fire Code Official's Office fields
numerous phone calls, walk -ins, field inspections and impromptu meetings.
Office of the Fire Code Official
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104