Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance 89-065
ORDINANCE NO. 89 5 _ -.. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE 69-05, AN ORDINANCE ENACTING AND ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNTY?R ,;� FLORIDA PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVEWKENTIP r COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELb_PRENTS rn REGULATION ACT OF 1985 AND CHAPTER I.RJ�5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, MINIMUM CR3�&IA ' UJI "t ��•n FOR REVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE tin s PLANS AND DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCEV',_•BY CORRECTING, UPDATING, AND MODIFYING CERTAIN -' ""• t COSTS, REVENUE SOURCES, SUPPORTING POLICIES, AND THE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES Co ' ENUMERATED IN THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEARS 1989/90 THROUGH 1993/94; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes also known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, also known no the Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance r: requires that Collier County correct, update, and modify costs, y. i revenue sources, or the date of construction of facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared an Annual Update to the x.,. Capital Improvement Element of its Growth Management Plan (Ordinance No. 85-5) that takes into consideration the plans and financial resources of the County and of the Agencies of the State of Florida: and WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, Sections 163.3177(3)(',; and 163.3187(2) provide for annual updates of local government Capital Improvement Elements that consider corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; p acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are �J consistent with the plan; or the date of construction of any facility enumerated in the capital improvements element; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission in a manner prescribed by law did hold a public hearing concerning the Soo. Q3F,'222- correcting, updating, and modifying of certain costs, revenue sources, and the date of construction of facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element for capital projects in Fiscal Years 1989/90 through 1993194 on September 21, 1989 and recommended that it be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners as prepared noting certain considerations and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public hearing on September 26, 1989; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: Update of Costs, Revenue Sources and Construction Dates of Facilities Enumerated in Capital Improve- ment Element of Growth Management Plan. This Ordinance, as described herein, shall be known and cited as the 1989 Capital Improvement Element Anrlial Update for Collier County, Florida. The Collier County 1989 Capital Improvement Element Annual Update, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, consisting of goals, objectives, and policies; requirements for capital improvements implementation; costs and revenues; and implementation programs, shall be the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element Annual Update of 1989 and shall supersede any and all previous Capital Improvement Elements applicable to the unincorporated area of Collier County. SECTION TWO: Severability. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. - 2 - BOOK 0"M w! 223 9 �r Y ,ry,sYffgN--' SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATED: September 26, 1989 ATTEST: JAMES C. GILES, Clerk it L71J . ;gy; 4 Virecinia, Magri (;Deputy Clerk 401 jtppzoved as to form and legal sufficiency: - MarjqVie M. Student Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: URT L. SAUNDERS, Chairman Th4 orfinawco filed wHh the bry of at&'$ offk: e and cy ° °C!°'o++' t o thot ft! � a (� - 3 - sm 036 PArt 224 CAPITAL ELEMENT First Update COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA GROWTH MANAGEKERT PLAN Prepared by Office of Growth Management Spring, 1989 BOOK 036 PA,,E 225 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First Update COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by Office of Growth Management Spring, 1989 BOOK 0-3f; 226 f _Z_ INTRODUCTION .II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMM GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES k: ' * III. IMPLEMENTATION Schedules of Improvements Roads f Drainage .v� Government Buildings Recreation t Open Space Potable Water Sanitary Sewer ';- Solid Waste * IV. COST AND REVENUES ,w •,, * V. IMPLM=ATION PRfJGIt = ". VI. ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Capital Improvements Projects i} Capital Improvements Financing Capacity Public Education & Health Facilities County Infrastructure Timing L Location of Capital Improvements: { Current Local Practices r; Financing Plan ,x * -Indicates portions to be adopted CIE - 2 BOOK 036 227 h;. Dc:CIE CIE - 3 r. - CIE - 4 CIE - 25 CIE - 26 CI$ -- 31.:, • CIE 32 CIE - 34 CIE - 35 CIE - 38, CIE - 40 - CIE - 41 CIE - 43 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Do ef:CIE In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strength- ened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the new provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulttion Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a capital improvement element to . consider the need for and location of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177 (3), Florida Statutes). The capital improvement element (CIE) is supposed to identify public facilities that will be required during the next five or more years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statues defines the phrase "level of service" as "...an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by... a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J-5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). CIE - 3 dooK Q3(� C CI �'�'�•. eurssw �/ Doc.Ref:CIE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL is To provide adequate public facilities concurrent with new development in order to achieve and maintain or exceed adopted standards for levels of service. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PUBLIC FACILITY TYPES. STANDARDS AND NEEDS OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for three categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this comprehensive plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this comprehensive plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, emergency medical service, other government build- ings, and dependent fire districts. The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. Category C includes those facilities operated by Federal, State, and municipal governments, independent districts, and private organizations. The standards for levels of service of Category C facilities shall be advisory only, and shall not apply to to the development orders issued by the County or the County's annual budget. CIE - 4 BOOR 0 3 OW `r.: 229 Doc.R of :CIE C 4.. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the county's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q = (S x D) - I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. A. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies: The calculat- ion will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. B. There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: 1. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. 2. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Manager. 3. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: CIE - 5 BOOK 036 P1 1i 230 cr Doc.Ref:CIE a. the facility does not make financially infeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and b. the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the three factors listed in Section 8 of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvements Element. All capital improvements projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this Policy. Policy 1.1.7: The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the county's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other C governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Policy 1.1.4 Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the capital improvements element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: CIE - 6 BOOK 036 231 Doc.Ref:CIE ,1 1. previously approved orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved orders permitting new development, 3. new orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new orders permitting new developments. D. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. Policy 1.1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: Category A Public Facilities Al County Roads A1.1 County arterial and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated " below on the basis of peak hour, peak season traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads 40M - To A—Trport Road Pine R dge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road to Santa Barbara Blvd Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway to U.S. 41 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road to I-75 CIE - 7 Doc.Ref:CIE A1.2 Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season on all other County arterial and collector roads, however any section of road may operate at Level of Service "E" for a period not to exceed two fiscal years following the determin- ation of Level of Service "E" in order to provide the County with time to restore Level of Service "D" by making appropriate improvements. Development orders may be issued during the two year period to the extent their issuance is consistent with policies 1.5.3. and 1.5.4. of this Element. A2 State and Federal Roads RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA I-75 C D US 41 C D SR 84 D D SR 951 - E SR 29 C SR 82 C A.3 County surface water management systems: A3.1 Future "private" developments - Applicable South Florida Water Management District requirements (present require- ments are a 25-year, 3-day storm event except where exempted by Chapter 40E-4.053, F.A.C.) A3.2 Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service to be identified (by design storm return frequency event) by April 30, 1989 utilizing the findings of the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan. A4 County potable water systems: A4.1 County systems 135 gallons per day per capita plus 21% for non-residential A4.2 City of Naples = 150 gallons per capita per day A4.3 Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in policy 1.3.1. of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. CIE - 8 BOOK 036FJ5'23 Doc.Ref:CIE AS County sanitary sewer systems: A5.1 County systems 100 gallons per day per capita plus 21% for non-residential A5.2 City of Naples = 150 gallons per capita per day A5.3 Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in policy 1.2.1. of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. A6 County solid waste disposal facilities: A6.1 1.55 tons of solid waste per capita per year A6.2 Two years of landfill lined cell disposal capacity at present fill rates A6.3 Ten years of landfill raw land capacity at present fill rates A7 County parks and recreation facilities: A7.1 Regional park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop. A7.2 Community park land = 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop. A7.3 Recreation facilities = $122.00 capital investment per capita (at current cost) Category B Public Facilities B1 County library buildings : 0.33 square feet per capita B2 County library collection : 1.0 books per capita B3 County Jail : 0.0033 beds per capita B4 County emergency medical : 0.00006 EMS units per capita service B5 County other government : 2.58 square feet per capita buildings B6 County dependent fire districts: B6.1 isle of Capri District = 0.00097 apparatus and stations per capita B6.2 Ochopee District = 0.00057 apparatus and stations per capita CIE - 9 eou 036 Pair ?34 Doc.Ref:CIE Qt�z7 C Public Facilities Q Municipal streets: C1.1 City of Naples = not to exceed annual average Capacity of "C" for all streets C1.2 Everglades City = Annual average of "A" for all Collectors C2 Federal and State lands surface water management: C2.1 Federal Lands Surface Water Management = To protect Natural Resources, development allowed will be designed so drainage will have no adverse impact on resources. (No measurable standard) C2.2 State Lands Surface Water Management = Leased lands for agriculture to have best management practices per clean water act. (No measurable standard) C3 Municipal surface water management: C3.1 City'of Naples = maintain existing level of service. New development to con!orm with County surface water. C3.2 Everglades City = 10 year - 24 hour storm event C4 Municipal potable water systems: C4.1 Everglades City = 135 gallons per capita per day, plus 21% for non-residential C5 Municipal sanitary sewer systems: C5.1 Evergladez City = 100 gallons per capita per day plus 21% for non-residential. C6 Private solid waste disposal facilities: C6.1 City of Naples = 1.55 tons per capita. C6.2 Everglades City = 1.55 tons per capita C7 Federal sad State Parks: C7.1 Federal Parks: Everglades National Park, Big Cypress Preserve - to protect environmentally sensitive lands. Boundaries set by legislation. (No measurable standard) C7.2 State Park: Policy is not to develop more than 20%. (no measurable standard) CIE - 10 s00K 036 PAA435 77 C7.3 C7.4 C7.5 C7.6 Doc.Ref:CIE State Recreation Area: standard is of no particular - size, Physical Development limited to no more than 50% of land area. State Preserves: to maintain exceptional objects or conditions. Physical development limited to no more than 5% of land area. (No measurable standard) State Museum: no standard for size State Ornamental Garden: no standard for size. C8 Municipal Parks and Recreation Facilities: C8.1 City, of Naples: a. Community Parks = 2 acres/1,000 population b. Neighborhood Parks = 1 acre /1,000 population C. Beaches 1 mile /25,000 population d. Recreation Facilities Level of Service Standards: _ 1. Basketball Courts = 1/ 5,000 population .F 2. Baseball Fields = 1/ 5;000 population 3. Beach Access Points 1/ 1,000 population 4. Boat Ramps = 1/ 6,000 population 5. Bike Trails 1/ 1,500 population C 6. Community Centers 1/ 8,000 population 7. Football Fields = 1/10,000 population. 8. Horseshoe Pits 1/ 2,500 population 9. Meeting Rooms = 1/ 6,000 population 10. Pavilions = 1/ 5,000 population 11. Picnic: Arex.s = 1/ 5,000 population 12. Play Areas = 1/ 6,000 population. 13. Racquetball Courts ■ 1/ 2,500 population 14. Shuffleboard Courts = 1/ 2,500 population 15. Swimming Pools = 1/25,000 population 16. Tennis Courts 1/ 2,000 population 17. Volleyball Courts = l/ 4,000 population C8.2 Everglades City: a. Community Parks = 1.25 acres/534 population b. Recreation Facilities: 1. Basketball Courts 1/534 population 2. Baseball Fields = 1/534 population 3. Bike Trails ■ 1/534 population 4. Community Centers ■ 1/534 population �. 5. Football Fields = 1/534 population 6. Pavilions 1/534 population 7. Picnic Areas = 1/534 population 8. Play Areas = 1/534 population 9. Tennis Courts = 1/534 population ' F CIE - 11 BOOK 036 w,06 I 0 Dom:CIE C9 Private recreation facilities: a. No standard in industry. b. Collier County Usable Open Space Requirement Ordinance 482-2 Sec. 7.27 1. Planned Residential Developments = 60% of gross area shall be devoted to usable open space. 2. Commercial, Industrial, and Mixed Purpose Development = At least 30% of gross area shall be devoted to open space. 3. Dedication of usable open space = Maximum of 8% of gross project site. QO Public schools: a. K - 5 Elementary School = 832 students/Building b. 6 - 8 Middle School a 1100 students/Building c. 9 -12 High School — 2200 students/Building Cil Public health facilities: County govermoent'buildings standard of 2.58 sq. ft. per capita includes the County's public health facilities. CIE - 12 BOOK 036E;�E237 Doc.Ref:CIE 2. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of rovenuo. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non -enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, jail, other government buildings, and dependent fire districts) shall be financed from current assets (pay-as-you-go financing) except as otherwise provided in this policy. Public facilities financed by non -enterprise funds shall not be financed by debt unless such borrowing is the only financing technique available that will enable the County to provide facility capacity CIE - 13 t061C U;J ?J:t ,JO { Doc.Ref:CIE sufficient to meet standards for levels of service concurrent with new development. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non -enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the five year capital improvement plan or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County Is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and mainten- ance costs of the facility. Policy 1.2.6. Prior to fiscal year 1989-90 the County shall adopt a revised Road Impact Fee Ordinance requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. policy 1.2.7 The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: Prior to fiscal year 1989-90 the County shall adopt a Stormwater Runoff Utility Fee system in order to fund drainage facility improvements. Policy 1.2.9: The County shall place a referendum before the voters to institute a general obligation Wdi bond for dtA1A d 41AAd10Aflt 14000¢. iAtil the purchase of Regional Park Land. CIE - 14 nox 036Qi5:239 1Wef:CIE Policy 1.2.1811: (� If, for any reason, the County cannot adopt one or more of the revenue sources identified in policies 1.2.6 through 11219 1.2.10 of this Element and said revenue sources are identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: A. Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; B. Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; C.. where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non -Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual updates. D. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. E. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.ZZ12• Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues of 13%. whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self imposed level of constraint. This policy will provide bonding capacity sufficient to meet the needs identified in the Capital Improvement Element Financing Plan. Bondable revenues are defined as ad valorem taxes and State shared revenues, specifically, gas taxes and the half -cent sales tax. The Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge (7th Cent) would also be included if it should be adopted by the Collier electorate to fund Rl&nned or future idUti dAl projects WVU01 to maintain adopted Level of Service Standards. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE - 15 y= .y,. eooK 036 wE 240 �• iio••, .jy Doin._IE PUBLIC EXPEMDITUEtES s COASTAL SIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities .-needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future land use Element. In addition public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; t` B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high ,,.. -hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future grc+wth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element C limits new residential development (thus obligations for infra- structure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. In addition, existing zoning not vested shall be re-evaluated within three years and may change to a density level consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and by December 31, 1992 develop a program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition. f, CIE - 16 600K W6► 4')41 - oD CIRef:CIE OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by.provid- ing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the "Requirements for Capital Improvements Implementation" section of this Capital Improvements Element. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. C. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1.4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.4.3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditure during the appropriate fiscal year. The County may also include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 B (3) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E). CIE - 17 BOOK 036 Plc 242 _ D W:CIE Policy 1.4.4: %f The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of building \\ permits, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No building permit shall be issued by the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1.5, Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. CIE - 18 led I Doc.Ref:CIE CONCURRENCY NAXA+GEKERT -�� . OB.TP.CT1VE 1.5: .In order to coordinate land use decisions and facility planning by the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, the County shall adopt a "Concurrency Management System" Ordinance for the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to development in order to achieve and maintain adopted standards for levels of service, and to exceed the adopted standards when possible. Policy 1.5.1. Beginning with the effective date of Plan Implementation through September 30, 1994, the coneurreney requirement for the Potable Plater, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards, of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impact of the development occurs. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of those facilities at the time a building permit is issued. D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the County's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction. E. The construction of required facilities is scheduled in the County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October 1, 1994. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be based on a realistic, financially feasible program of funding from existing revenue sources and shall be adopted as a part of this Growth Management Plan. CIE - 19 10o� till t 4AU . Doc.Ref:CIE 1. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any Category A facility in the Schedule of Capital Improvements which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any development order issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under this section is expressly conditional so that the permit shall be suspended and no further development shall be carried out in the event any of the following occur without a corresponding plan amendment: a. The required facilities are removed from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements. b. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the Schedule of Capital Improvements. C. Construction of the required facility or facilities is not undertaken in accordance with the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements. F. In any event the capacity required to accommodate the unit of demand required to meet the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water level of service standards shall be ` available at time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy. , -s Policy 1.5.2. Effective October 1, 1994 the concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management Systems are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time the building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place and operational when the impacts of the development occur. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued.-z C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of these facilities at the time a building permit is issued. CIE - 20 Doc.R of:CIE D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the County's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction. E. In any event the capacity required to accommodate the unit of demand to meet the Sanitary Sewer and Potable water level of service standards shall be available at time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Policy 1.5.3. Beginning with the effective date of Plan Implementation through September 30, 1994, the concurrency requirement of the Traffic Circulation Level of Service Standard of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of these facilities at the time a building permit is issued. D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the State or local Government's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction, provided that the level of service (LOS) of any road does not fall beyond the next lower LOS below the adopted standard (i.e. LOS standard is "D" peak hour, peak season and service does not fall below "E" peak hour, peak season). E. The construction of the required facility is included in the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the County's current five (5) year Capital Improvement Schedule adopted as a part of this Growth Management Plan prior to October 01, 1994. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project in the Schedule of Capital Improvements which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any development order issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under this section is expressly CIE - 21 Oe WOK 1f\ pA�i Ow V j�_ M DCM:CIE conditional so that the permit shall be suspended and no further development shall be carried out in the event any of the following occur without a corresponding plan amendment: 1. The required facility is removed from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements. 2. A=ual funding is insufficient to maintain the Schedule of Capital Improvements. 3. Construction of the required facility or facilities is not undertaken in accordance with the County's adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements or the state's Five (5) Year Work Program. -policy 1.5.4. Effective October 01, 1994, the concurrency requirements of the Traffic Circulation Level of Service Standard of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of these facilities at the time a building permit is issued. D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the State or local Government's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction, provided that the level of service (LOS) of any road does not fall beyond the next lower LOS below the adopted standard (i.e. LOS standard is "D" peak hour, peak season and service does not fall below "E" peak hour, peak season). E. The construction of the required facility is included in the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the County's current five (5) year Capital Improvement Schedule adopted as a part of this Growth Management Plan and: CIE - 22 Boo( 03F PA�r27 Doc.Ref:CIE 1. The Board of County Commissioners have made an express finding, after a public hearing, that the current five (5) year capital improvement schedule is based on a realistic, financially feasible program of funding from existing revenue sources; and 2. The level of service (LOS) on all roads serving the development will not, at any time, operate below peak hour, peak season LOS "E"; and 3. The level of service (LOS) on any road serving the development will not operate at peak hour, peak season LOS "E" for a period of more than two (2) years; and 4. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project in the Schedule of Capital Improvements which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any development permit issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under this section is expressly conditioned so that the permit shall be suspended and no further development shall be carried out in the event of any of the following occur without a corresponding plan amendment: a. The required facility is removed from the five (5) year capital improvement schedule or the State's five (5) year work program: b. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the five (5) year capital improvement schedule or the State's five (5) year program C. The level of service on any road serving the development operates below peak hour, peak season LOS "E"; d. The level of service on any road serving the development operates at peak hour, peak season LOS "E" for a period of more than two (2) years; and e. Construction of the required facility or facilities is not undertaken in accordance with the five (5) year capital improvement schedule or the State's five (5) year work program. CIE - 23 tool( 036 PA,,, 248 DOW:CIE Policy 1. 5 - 5 on or before the time mandated for the adoption of land develop- ment regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, the county shall implement, through the adoption of an ordinance, a Concurrency Management System and a monitoring program. C. CIE - 24 BOOK C36 P1,2 WAA f_ 1 4wef:CIE y REQUIF22UMTS FOR cApiTALmPROVEMENTS IMPLEKENTATION SCBBDULE OF CAPITAL "a The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. y�. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. CIE - 25 eoo� Q�F, P"`'`-250 .Y S W 03 0 In 0 N -0 qr NO r_4 rq r- Ln %0 P4 %D r4 %0 _f LM co r- Ln 0 C14 C14 r4 qT r4 Ln W-4 CN I cn vq t Ln 94 1 cn I V4 co LM to co en cr% Ncal a% %D N 4 m t lZ4 ch 1 1 N N r-4 Do Ln N Im 1 N r.1 IV In co I A-i %a co Go I'A H > 41 0 A A in wqq -H V r. — Ind tm 0 lu cm u 0 M mV %a r4 %D B rd c r. 1 9 9,00 N MF r_4 4J a Id 4),q 110 1 rd .0 rl 10 H m F-4 ON N H (4 " rd > (44 N —6 u —4 A 4) 1-4 0 N P-4 t7i 0 Ol 94 00 M rod H Is id 2 0 94 0 11 U V 4 10 � r-1 10 rq C6 V4 0 P, •14 "q v id 41 10 Iri 0 v 4 v N en 4") a 4 pu r4 V. 0. 'd to— � 1 id 0 Ln W r, t4 Ln k A 41 W (n wav rk V " 0 v 0 0 rd 4) d) 'a J24 a 0 (d W 0 11 > w r. 0 N C44 to i M(a r QI 14 1 0 4) 1 a) H IV 0 0 0 rd 4) L) 0 IV 44 0 44 ed 11 Jj I H m cQ H r-4 F-4 1 -1 r4 pq r 4 r4 0 1 H ri 0 1 M H v N 4 w _H M -14 di 41 1 14 r-4 t4 -W 4 0 S —1 r4 E rd I-W 41 L, co mn jE NM i g Ln v c4 W -w r4 r4 co A co.,4 %a �A F r.4 m cn ..0 W ix pa 2 r4 :3 -4 .4 #dH:Dcn rcHulcn ld I 7-4 N en -0 in %a to 0 1-4 r4 I H rl CIE — 26 gooK MwE251 Qi I N " ►" ` N I Q1 1 ri i •�; C1 rM. j CN I I 1 1 in I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I .• I � I I I Q 1J 1 CO3)I 1 t� rCL�ii a L In N t� O C1 M N %t0 r1 r-f r t. � r• 1 I I t- t � I - w I t , IA p ri N Ln co eD •• N Ln N Ln co Ln Ln r � r•I rl i 17 � y► .. 1 PJ I�I rl to •T M Ln M V G a b .. .� a c>: �ro I* a v 1 en NCO q� a. 1 N -1 N N cc N 0 N «<rrr 14 .bt Rf7� b V 9 0/ U U H �U � V *i N � N �LI 1 v Q . I N to #a }N� o lJ rl j{ 1 � � 'd H � U b H N PCii M TI Ho. N �d ~ N 1) G 1q f>~I 'C� A 4 A r1 I � •G bUUt��� �a'C7�H0 aA••O1 41 ��QQ 1Qq nRf 1g9�d) �iJl H14 03 °a�^�' 1 �tn �rlRtroA►�1r1 oA.�.d1 FIA� 4lrlW Ci CJ BN 07v»Iww0�r1N �� NrirlrIN 0 fd () E "0 4J00 N In to rn a: bU V1 rq a �. d �cn 'O r0 �! .Hi D p� N HNN tpWaNC.UrI ra wr1 aaaN (aUN9'JLn r1 Ci10 rNi rM1 H H H rn-1 rp•1 N N CIE — 27 DOOK 036 PA�t 252 "town 0 `,- r._ I Ai I ' I k O N N Vl tCl C0 C1 In .-1 Y1 10 O r-1 cm CIO to Ch CO O I N N M 0-4 In to O P1 I On I ri ' O Y1 N Ch O I N I Ln CA n N O N Chtn I QN1 N IV �, 1D 07 co w %D C1 I N N 00 O 00 N 1n N O 10 V1 O %0 00 �a N i:In O I O N Ch IV at In p N O N L1 � C O O !` C7 N IA �, O A" m coQ1 ( r/ GoV In N N 00 1 ^ iq I I A a A O A Igv ., n nibm V. .14 a ro .H a4 W I \ r•1 O O �� uN m R O'O u of.4 01 m� 1 a! roA r~+� N .0 T1 .0 'C7 v� rd Ix u YOi .�d r�i .-1 r-1 �P '0 x Q, n 8 I °i u ro�I � fa+1 1.I i0 W 'L7 N 11 i0 Jam+ .0 Q1 'C1 b1� Wu�iAA�1N1.b1�.�.�1 �ctro bx�.1� •• u o c� w b 0 4JC4 ..41 ..4J p .• q) ro � o E ro•.�V rq u •• ��xA � rn o a 1 Li C la r-1 U y r i L1S N r-I f: h C. iuu! O A > �7 YIN Q+ M J e �d y I U••toAI�AUr-4AI��Oa.. huV-HOC74Jr�1:3 mM v(A I w 0) ►d •-1 w 1 -4 w 4 rl ro --1 O w dl t� w U (jj���{j t7✓, I o r-I w •-+ E w E ��tz wjy7 ,� E N u 0 r-1 IN o 4 N .[►SV.1i v a E u 15 M r1 1-4� r-1 o 1 ar-1N> > cod>-r41f4 ro� UH� -OH '4'J)E-1 Er_j m 01%N O iN 141 1 N r1 •p 00 N r1 tr GL 1 N N N N N N N r�i CIZ - 28 .. ' BOOK 036 o, :_ 253 i4• m m P"4 i0 N el 0 r• cn qr Aj I rA C% co (14 r4 to Ln Ln r4 C4 rn In V-4 a% N r- 00 r- en to tn rn rl Or Ln N Ln r4 V co rl rI Ln 0 gn fl; co N 0 0% at N w m Ln in r4 7 D PA 'n rp rat co a 1 m 131 010 v rd E Ln 1% id r4 -4 N w a > H c% u cm 0 0 0 --Mo 0 r: to 4 V) V 1 r, 0 0 tft 41 m w En ra V 10 w Z $4 v Pt 0 r. (d 10 0 Oav H to 4 w m p — 0 41 (a 94 4 rd >,• q 4) rd 0 r- 4.) 0 0 a% &� 41 co Or4 H > 44 m v V. 14 r_4 0 �4 1"1, N 48) 10 V 4 V I" V H V W 41 W a4) a(a ,4 o 0 -4 , V) u 8 m4 o M k a0 9 109 'o 'fad -1 IS 1 4, r-4, 0 0-4 0 .0 my I OWEQ od r- 01 C4 0 H M H > H 0. fd 01c �-f %0 W Ul 0 H $4 W. r. 4) 41 V 4JQ V r-4 M 14 14 00 a AJ a 4 v 0 m m i Ln oil bi to 01 w H 0 0 a lu 0 w.100 0 d F, IOU a V 10 w .54 4 H 4 0 r_q (a r. > a Z H a rn 04 tv 0 1-4 ko (A 0 W Ad 04 5 Ln > :3 r4 1-4 0 F4 0 � 0 w 00 n m rl N -0 I I I" m en m -7 lw qw Rr , CIE — 29 SOOK 0 6 pz! -254 r- Ln en t-1 fri T-4 cl 0 c% tn en 0 (n I r4 N I V r4 In r-4 N r4 Ln w c,% 1 c%l 0 r-4 %0 -4 LA qv r4 -W c"I I r4 O co co LM C4 cc I %n > 0 v 4) H (d V rl v V royal00 r so V 9044 o ;g Nv v 1 r-4 rd r-4 M 41 - .4 1 0 �4 1 C4 ld V 0 . 0 M rd to w 0 .0 'd -0 0 0 > ld0> 0 4J r4 P-4 rd -4 f9 —1 in 0 I �4 I 00 14 V W() w m V m 0 in 14 M p H 44 0 M V4 to Cr w C% CIE 30 lOOK 036PAE 255 41 r14 co r4 0% -W in qw 0 (A C4 40 kn r4 Ln 1-4 40 tp 4 to en N r% co O co 0% 1 r- I I en en fm I N to 430 0 N 14 1 0 0 co %o co o W) C4 co —4 qw LM Go en %a 0 V to c*4 Ln 0 In 0 0% 1 0 qw Ln tn -4 14 cc I 4J &n 1 (4 00 co V 0 0 (1 41 $4 —4 w —4 $4 -4 -H 0 44 :1 AJ :3 41 V 41 $4 w 0 V U 41 UV U V -4 E UO E) :3 UV 94 10 r. 0 7 1i :1 $4 V w —1 c 0 > w 41 $4 4.) W V H --ri W 8 0 41 94 V ul V 0 41 0 14 ma FA r. to r. Ul 0 00 14 C E r-f 0 10 $4 u 0 to 0 r. 4j w U-4 q 4:,j I P-1 r-4 0 0-14 9: 0 0 0 0 C 2 �, U--,A z At P4 'o 4j r. u 'a 0 $4 0 w V. .0 0 ou V 0 0 v �4 8 11 $44) r- ou 0 1-1 0 a -� q 44 A 4.) -r-4 to U -H ru a *0 Id 10 41 V) 14 r-1 1w u r-4 rd F-4 od 04 9 r-4 r. 144 14 I %a M -4 v $4 od ld -H c� gam (d 0 ff4 0'0 to 0 V to r 94 am W go a w to to %: ta ta �l 10 > w 0 0 0 () E (4 0 U 0 4.) rj 0 V r. U 0 AJ 44 4J 00 V z a 0-r4 0 V —4 a .14 -4 r. r- 00 m —f 44 4) 0 oo 44 V I 0 V 44 V 4) Id 044 V 4) 14 10 a 1 1 A4 3: 1 4J 0 W U u 0 rd V 0 4) 0 la E u 4) 0 #0 r:: - Q u 0 Ln W >o -r4 U) V $4 us -4 > r. m -4 > ul -H > 10 #d w fu 0 Ai NOUO .2 4U 44 0 0 V 164 0 W IU 44 0 Ic -4 r. v g v -H V --, 1 0 14 �4 w w 10 04 -1-4 —f w WE 04 -4 �4 14 m Ma u & -.4 9 1 W :3 M 0 0 -,4 4) V C 8 d? 0 E 4) IE V 04 00 E �4 ed IQO014 x al x u A V) w m u En 19 —4 W E -14 0 U) E --i P4 34 'U 0 1 N -0 Ln N I' CIE - 31 BOOK 036 256 IMM r4 f %0 ,W f " N (4 r� ell en m 0 rn to (n 110, cri %a %0 tn CM C14 0% ► %0 10 %0 ch I Ln 0% Ln at I •m ri 4c C4 'n fn m in cn C4 Ln -W el el An 01 1 N r% r*l 0 r4 (4 co ca cc I r- Ln 4) In 41 to V 41 4j 44 41 -4 ,tn. V Od 0 9: V 4, 4j 41 0 o 0 to -q 0 a IV k c 1 , 0 0 41 -4 V " to 41 %0 00 0 -4 U -H 41rj > 9: 0 1 v 0 44 In M Ad > al i'C7 _4 k ma 0 u PC laa $4 *9 0 0 00 m .0 a g k g A tNT lim v v iq r. -V 44 -f H 00 4j 144 r-j U r 0--f #a 43 0 4.; 0 0 k w 0 k AJ 0 4) 0 --1 A 0 44 '144 14 C 14 -1 k a k F4 04 ed r-4 V -4 z 44 JJ 44 = go 0 4 10 P") 0) H V, 0 A in• " u -4 to 0 0 -H 1 .7004 to 0 w 41 41 Of > -4 0-4 Z 0 ci 1444J 0 "q P4 k H 0 > H C) Aj k V V M g H 0 01 u 4) v :00140 m ri _,I 0 0 a en 04 U m C4 47 C4 0 m qr M m 0 0 0 tA Ln Ln 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln CIE - 32 bOOK 036PAE2-V 7-7 co Id 1 C14 C4 V CIA m rn O co 91, 1-4 �-W q Ln Ln Im C4 at co Cr% I • m I In In co -. I C4 (4 a% I 49 in LA 14 r- Ln Ln a C4 r4 it fn en &n n C> o r4 r4 0% co co C4 0% to Ch -k 0 1 .q r1 O co O to (n t- 11 %D t0 V r4 O r.) a 0% . 01% C14 r4 0 w co %0 10 Go I Ln w 4j $4 0 40 V .10 14 t; tr ji so v '01 �V 4) 14 0 04414 Id :3 0 0 k 0 44 A: V) V 0 > tj 0 rq 0 -W 0 (1 ul 0 P4 0 4)0 0 4J - -M W V 9 :3 0 ly Ol r_ m V 0 0 64 A 41 0 0 14 W v 0 rl N r4 -4 C6 4 U Q W -H 0 Wz L) A-) u -14 C4 0 14 we 0 Ai 1-4 0 C, c cC), r-4 -H -4 0 U4 V U., C, ra > .0 1 44 4) 0 1 0 V 0 $4 V 0u 0 44 W C U V -4 0 —44 .0 V rQ 0 cl v 0 0 gn 0 0: 1 A w 4) OJ — 0 U E 0 u .0 :3 0% C� 0 -4 g 0 E Ln 0 Aj 0 k Q 0 OC4 0 40J 0 -4 u I C: w V a 0 v 1 >, - - a ta 0 r4 :1 0 00 c 0,4 m Aj .0 m -4 :t :0-14 93 -,1 0 V > 0 41 In 0 (W l4 % -4 0 v m m V 0 0 4) 0 :)4 u 4 .14 tT41 �j -4 It -H -V be w I cn 0 %0 '0 0 0 --f 0 0 > :1 4J 0 44 V H 0 V P r. 0 V 10 0 0 z u 0 4-A 0 C4 w (D 14.0 0 0-14 -'4 'r- a ,, S -4 -04 Pq 0 00 1 a M U Od M 4J -4 "4 V 0 k V 0 14 Q *I V v Ma 0 4 Im r. --Q4 H V 0 :1 0 w > -4 0 -4 r. -4 m 10 41 $4 Z 0 0 9 gn r4 a 0. -4 to 0-4 :3 0 - Q go -f H; to 0 V oq V A a � vAd Ic 14 ul Ww v w a 030 o u W-.4 al l UO 0 a 0 >N v 0 -14 ji 0 0 0 r. H -4 4 "4 M 14 t7w Aj O• Cm W.H r. V >4 a ul C 4j U ov-,4 c t7l rq 10 :s gn 0 a -4 U 0 1; 2. 94 4 1 U W W > M 44 > W -H v 10 fd � - >4 1 14 P, ,q .q 4) >A m r-4 k 0 O.0 -.4 0 o > %4j 4; >4 A $4 V >,W 41 C 0 V 00 0 " a � CZ W b4 Z 44 Z 44 :1 to > U01 0 Mo 44 VM Z OV4060g 1 41 to 44 C4 to "0 11 .0 0 M IV Ln co I Ln 0 0 0 0 PI I Ln to %0 %D %D CIE - 33 IDOX FAIE2% 0 rol to to C) 0 Lr) a IV rf fn to 14 -4 to to o ri r r- to Im to to n -W r� to at r 1 to m r4 W M eq 00 ai Go to N qr 0 (4 r, O V. on rn I r-1 pq en Im I % I V N In Ot %0 to'!' 4t C4 co %D in N r-1 co N in tn to rn In N 40 f, co V LM 0 to w co 49 14 N 0 a V co %0 a M .0% M I r4 1 0 N co %D O 0 co %D Im 1 0 (4 (IN 1-4 Go C4 1 10 -cr Ln en tN 1-4 C4 ID C) I M co 0 co N co Go to 14 (D v 44 4) P4 H 4) 0 4) 4 -14 'A ro 0 4J 90 V > V V V -14 00 m -4 ra Ln 0 0 8 4) r-1 04 4) % r-4 4) 04 ar 1-4 tv z -4 0 14 H -4 0 000 0 u 0 td N 41 :1 a u 0 H 9 4 ld to to to m $4 V 0.14 V #d 1-4 in m94 H W - $4 .444 - R44 -H 4 14 H u Ad -1 A 4) 4 0 4) 9 0 .0 -H ma 0 V 4) V to 0 94 0 tit $4 >1 V of V 94 14 od 0 r4 A4 tv V C-4 -H 00 >1 id 0 a 0 0 -AL) 0 r-1 r 4 144 -4 - ty, I rq 4 V x 0 $4 $4 :1 a . I A -4 N -f 9: —4 cn W u - c; 0 110 to C4 1-1 *4 $4 M 44 w ?A H A4 :3 zo 144 04 4 1 , 0 Ti 1 a 4) 1 - 0 A 'M4 00 00 z I H S m 00 FA +i 94 V (V � li 40, . f-4 9 m sd Oc I rl W 4 4 1 0 1-4 H 4) r-4 -H -4 V 1 44 41 -4 0.01 V) Ad 4 H r: (a 11:4) W IV, W iv 00 A, 0 .04 9 'S m'* S. >1 01-4 go 14 1 P, 41 H 0, >1 41 >, 6 w -�4-i .0 I .11 c V) —4 z 41 (a -,4 H V rd -4 r: -4 iV t)% ed I= u 41 t; P4 a4 10 go W $4 PC -1 0 9 -r z 0 q --I Mc g a 0-.4 m 04 r. u p L) U od c 4j (u v I fa al.H v 0 u R 0 41 x v .0 4j 1 �4 > Ic r. '0 0 0 0 -4 m w 41 ed c 4 40 �z " 1 0 0 ty, 0 -4 fd IA 0 9 r-4 $4 4 k 14 1* a 0 Id 0 10 r4 fn .1 m a 0 %a 0 L) Ot 164 W Z , r-4 0 a% Ai 04 rq f� 0- 0 1 .4 N fn V Ln to r- Go of P4 w 1 0 0 a 0 0 00 0 a rq r4 CIE — 34 BOOK V36PI'-Z9 O N " r- o in r4 a rq N to N w allfu c4l, tip: T 0 1 co 0 C4 Rr r- co c� Ln c%j c, a Ln Go I Ai Ai (i r-4 th od � i -4 M , �4 . Id -d 10 1-4 4J rd rd fj rd I E V6 WU r. fd fd M WH W 0 E a E u 4) r. 0. .14 z z 8 0 COL IU t I r4 #d 00 CU Ll 4j P — W 10 11 tj) w u 0 Z W 14 -4 ul w w .1, 10, 0) v r-4 (d H (D W W U $4 H z 4) 4) 'd 0) 'd 41 g u V 39 oG 4J 9 V 93, 941 a Q w a 41 0 .4 o 11 Ag rd W (d fo V 4-1 04) rots r. V H (d 9 Cd 4) (d 3: rota ed 9 x -4 ed a %D u 3: pq 4 cu 4 .4 of C4 ul P4 -f N 2 x 'A 4-) 44 3 G _4 N,o . r-4 N %D C' C-4 2 rl 17,-4 4 0 r-f N 44 N 1044 -f H 44 ix %o o o .4 14 C4 '1 4) U AJ -4 N to 0 c) 0 44 '44 1 C4 44 9-4 44 Ad 0 p r-4 44 9144 0 > 44V 4) 0 j 0 0 044 &W 1 0'0 r. V id V 0 — 0 OP4 .r4 0 FO V :1 0 4j 0 0 (d $4 r- Z � 44 0 t� ;W A a 0 4) U V 0 0 C) Z . a W di 4L) w0 0 41 li H 4:,o w 41 .4 t. MA Q 4j ,1, 144 H H 0 ci 0 V w 0 r 0W r- W U fd U $4 M A F-4 04 0 H w to %D >4 -W -H (D -4 0 41 -4 w -4 4) 'A tv -40 a 0 � to 0 40 to 41 1 V kD 0 a > - > v 940.00 m w 0 w V 112 8 w 8 10 cn r. Go fd -W � . 0 N rd 4j m Id UEOU Woww-�o %o U Ln a 1-4 N r- H oc Ln U 0 V X $4 U—gr4p4Ln f-4 Ln N 14 C4 en qr in %a co m 0 rq r4 m Ln - %o r� co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r.4 r4 H H H H pq H 04 I Go co Co co co w w w w w w w w w w w CIE - 35 BOOK 036 m! 260 v 'n 00 f1l co ri tn C4 C4 0 m en %D fn -W r-4 H en ch 0-4 V-4 N 1 a% I a% I cm I cn 0% 0 m 0 m v M M W J M IW �3 r4 P4 at I IC O I r4 m 9-4 V o tn a% -v in co 0 N co 0 (n V qw in co at co N In N %o 0 go 41 -4 4) A4 fd --4 -A -H ty N 4 9 'o -4 1: X -4 -4 m -g 3: X 0.0 04 0 w -4 -1 w 9 9 -.4 X: -4 .11 $4 N Ir 4) CS 0 v 0 ar lu a 0 $4 it 41 A4 4) B u B $4 B a9 3C 3r4 3: 3: 39 3: $4 X 4) 1 2 t 3t 3: It 3: W 3: It I lt4 "4 0 %o +4 14 z 101, 1 -4 � B 1'. V M M to W a rq M N a N t V cow %a 9 4 t -4 w r-4 14 4 44 �4 0 OV" 44'0 " C4 �4 10 .4 14 1,041 44 0 44 1"r4442)' od oggr%3�4� 44 '44 A 144 44 0 0 4j NON r. 0 0 jj p 0 Q 0 004 94 044 44 g -4 t c� 0 �4 -4 wo 94, 0 �q 4tij 4rj: u ran 0 f", �84 rX4 cz 0 3 w 1 -4 41 In c, Ntn a in N p N co *,0 �r-49M>LnON oloomr-mo"0,044Ln r-1 OVN r-4 O� V 0 w ow rd ul 44 idgw1chingog A 0 COO logogo 0 in co r4 6 ,n A ch Ln r- w w r� 8 0 w %0 u P i 0 oc; r� in r� c4 Ln rC 0 1 14 1 Cm 4 (14 •4 m N N -w N Ln %o N N r- co c7j a N N N M r4 Mm (4 M V'Ln M en m w m w w w w w w w w w co Go co Go co Go CIE — 36 r . , ioo( 036PA,!261 I 4 ~ o m cl$ ri r'1 co %o a %0 %V r4 0 0 1 14 fV 0% O rf t` r• w N 0% N M 'r V1 N r1 •P (n -W N r-1 N rq r♦ O% �y Go N O% 1 f•1 1 I!1 O t0 r-1 O N 01 I O co N in a CD N H H in m 1 0 01 ( IA N 1 C1 I .,t N I m "4 r'/ « C1 1 O ri r• ~ r1 1 r1 ��j ~ N 01 I N 01 I tn co %0 01 1 N r• %0 Ln co 1 1 - N r/ 02 1 .1 p W I N HO Ln 1 L� to la bl A 11 Q1 k • f $4 1 � ro to to to q >r d tr m v 3 .+{ 4J u V -4 d 'Cl V 'G a.) v7 V d r"1 AJ H ro ro s to to LL • 1 ro ro 5 ro H ro Lo ro •►1 N V1 a KK 3�2 3 r♦33 3 3 3 -4 ►7 I� Rl H .-I tl aV �•ri� b.N1 brN.1 10N r4 Q7 ix ° AO44144.�'I114� aiawa rr t�ty 1 J- 0 OO l 'a 04 V O T O S O IOW4) i I aporo 41 410woko44P-4 4N.114aU:w�Va44Ww�VawQp� �d M M 2d1L•H 41.41 4.Uxaa acOEn t I •rl a 0 0 0.1 0 M .i o 0 0 0 0 Lf •J Lm.0O ON >V1 O Ut of Ot Ot tot 0 ri Z Sl ; +Iri •r4CO-4C% ' 4J tdN0N00NONNNr1 vv I r7 r� .-1 A p .i Cr r- %o In tow .i co r-1 N H to .-1 Ln .-j co z t9 Gti O I Co ON O ri N f•1 ,P %0 I- Co 0% O r4 w 1 r1 r1 t7 Q Nr qr ,! w •7 v •P 1A V1 .Z a I 0 w= 0 0 Co 0 co tp co co co pp co CIE - 37 6001( 03t1 POSE 262 qm N O r� `P m N t0'to GO 'mN tD r- co t0 '�? a: - O lw (n to O 1- N H N r-1 to V' O .i ri N+ N 1� :L co m Ot %0 N lw to N co 0% O a% r4 ri --: to in ST' , Ln r- to in r- O't t0 t0 to o ri r^I V' P1 r"1 �Y^ N O N t0 to O N _ O V Wop, a� v 3 A In � to •r ' o H 41 O 1r4 +1 1.1 v 0 O A -1 r�l -4 0 m 1-4-4 0r-4 1d A O 0 F' O -4 H • ..� 11 Ti q rtool 1G +I ri O O +11.1 �p C. op 0H iv 1� &H41 w wu 44 Id V 0�OOT1i O d '.rN 8 voln�o a D ow N a�� cuiA 0 r1v9CNacmi 0 C .10 A.) O OSri--1m N U H0001+I ND Id0l00C� H O O 0 -0 V 0 Id 0 +-1 _q ji H a O +1 rd U s�+ CS L► U ..1 0 %% O H -1 O O d MI L x Od La O w y> t4 H O 0 N H iA� a� r1 w a� +1 r. 4) Id0 •�W0 wPOi L AOWInV>awylUto o. �Go U v G 0J A.+ 1-4 U OJH U 11 H 0 s N V U A N fxV0 4 0 0 04:3 pf 1+ ij Go I H 1 N • V H r-1 Id H 01 to vl 1 O O ', o H o a N co gin 7+� OwJ.0 C >, U �+ y 0 O»OI O�rp Cw a�rp vw C014p /± O a U vo vo v-- v•-o>r o !' 0 7C001�•09 o1� m0 0 war u1>� :810 V10 3 a.-4)V rowr>Ila �Wr>110�aaJa N �8 Igo • N � IV • W M C.' • W O i1 41014 �J AJ O 0�4LAjH-4 rO'IVO�r01jIAwW00W0r0�00 0000 aOw00C t3l 14 d1 .-1 A a -1 v 1C a N 0 0 o w o w 0 D+ w- 4 M a w o to v ,-1 •A V v --1 V$ :4 - 4 y l C a N a Go a rn a o -H Tt v O� .i a�110 --I Hto UTANl U08.4V77 RIN +! +L U>NL NO>ta! M 0 07 (d ro >4 ro 0 U v v 0 U H --1 L o N :.-1 0 : J -r rq 4) 0 V 00 1� W o . i0) ZAwN0w0—AAW—vvWN.-IHN.-1rlaN810rlOrAVN041-1 r 4 N "r %a N 00 O1 O HN M• •r► in O O O O O O 9-4 r-1 rl rd H rl 01 01 01 0 a% 01 a% O1 O1 a% OI 01 01 1 CIE - 36 l! e 500K 036 PA,,E 263 al R, 10P en -W co Go -W co Ln a 41 lw W Ln an %D co In ch cn 01 1 fn C4 710% A 1 '00 M I 41 00 a% t, CD I I co OGo tn 'T, H I co Ln C, M m r4 a% a, Ln in M 4 N "r -W 1-4 Ly L8 V A co in Aj a, or: 00 u 10 010 Q 44 0-4 -H v a "0 4'a V Ci 1 V so-9. M 4j :J 44 rq &', 0 iv o Ln to AJ -H of 0 cq -4 04 HN 91414 10 41 E 0 14 0 V H to 9 0 IX C 0 >144 V 44 M -f 0 m 4.) >I >1 41 44 0 0 x o 41 In - 4j 0 Z vo 0 0 OC U) En 4j 41 q 4' 414 9 W -q 'W a- r- -W 0 .' -H 0 W rL4 a 0 >1 0 �4 V f - :1 W 0 9009 0 g La 4 0 11,4 u 4J :3 L) 4.j':i W 94 V ��g 0 0 OIC w —4 14 M C 0 Aj R c Uvv 4.) 1-4 4J H r-4 V A. g 0.40 0 o w 0 co 0 4J Ln -w 41 V In 4C 4J C% .Ai q V 00 Oro 0 0 M 0 X 0 ix 41 0 ya tv • 0 11 �HO41 o 41 N V (3 0) Z 44 U 0 C4 U r4 0 1 Coqz E-4 k I r% co rq H rq rn Rp Im ch N rq ai CA ch ar4i ON CIE — 39 o-, 19 o (n N rq 4W N 1 Ln V C14 0 1 LA 00 1 Ln Ln O co w r. %0 co 04 1-4 N r-4 rq Q %0 Ln C4 ko in r4 -0 49 in 0 co do to ta 10 I V cn #44 � 4 rq ri 0 14 04 -f r-f H r V () w L) 1$.4 0 r. IU & r.4 V 0) `4 M r-1 H rl 4) H 4) U 8 tj p0 H 1� 0-1 u 0 0 ri 4) 14 u c u ci Q H V #0 14 H IZ V 5 rl 10 0 -4 r-f H V r4 V F-4 10 P-4 C4 -1444 A (1 V -4 -4 CA IV W4 to 0 -eq 4) ..-q 44 44 M4 r.0 rM 044 PEI u w co $4 V 14 La a 0 � 1 0 -H 0 r. Ua u 4 40 r-,j a0 1 Aj 44 r-i 444 4.) #4 .14 r. A V 0 '0 OV W 0 A -4 4) 4) u > (d 1-4 f-I 0 00 0 0) P. 04 w > �4 w to m z N 4v 04 41 z z Ck N v 0 " H 44 1 H H La �4 E -If H lu H -00 4) 0 0 M 91 & W 0 U $4 tO 4) Ol id 0 0 fV 41 94 U -4 4) V to -f P. F-4 14-14 M r-i F-4 IV r-1 to q 4) od 010 4) 040-4 9 04 w w Mi2m w re 0) c 0 fa -.4 Pd z P4 z u -1 k z 44 0 124 i -4 rq P-1 CIE — 40 SOU& ollbPrA265 M M w Doc.Ref:CIE COSTS G REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY category A Public Facilities In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5. COUNTY'ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS ; 73,503,000 LESS Available Revenues: Constitutional Gas Tax $ 2,178,000 County Gas Tax 6,206,000 Local Option Gas Tax 18,415,000 Road Impact Fees 20,854,000 `•u' Gas Tax Revenue Bonds 9,000,000 56653,000 Deficit STATE ROADS NETWORK LESS Available Revenues: FDOT 5-year Work Plan Developer Contributions DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS LESS Stormwater Utility Fee Bonds WATER i SEWER SYSTEMS LESS Available Revenues: System Development Fees Grants Uncommitted Carry Forward Revenue Bonds - New Issues SOLID WASTE LESS Solid Waste User Fees 4,865,000 1,000,000 Deficit Balance 22,200,000 "4,900,000 1,823,000 39,788,000 Balance Balance PARKS 6 RECREATION LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees ; 12,501,000 Boating Improvement Program 843,000 Deficit CIE - 41 600R 036 m! 2-U6 ;(16,850,000) ;;: 43;,577,000 5865,000 ;(370,712,000) ,'26;629,000 �-26'629,000 0 - ; 68,711,000 68,`711,000 0 10;185,000 10185,000 ; - 0 27,672,000 13,344,000 ;(14,328,000) ki M M M Doc.Ref:CIE 44. Category B Public Facilities EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Deficit $( 978,000) JAIL Deficit 9,636,000) LIBRARY Buildings $ 4,266;000 Collection 1,323,000 Reserve for Future Projects 488;000 -,Total Library costs 6,077,000 LESS Available Revenues: Library Impact Fee = 5,498,000 State Aid for Libraries 400,000 -Trust Fund 179,000 6,077,000 Net $ - 0 - GOVER1000" BUILDINGS $ 8,949,000 LESS Available Revenues: State Grant for Health Bldg. $ 250,000 State Funds for Agriculture 135,000 Building Uncommitted Carry Forward 3,131,000 3,516,000 5,433,000) FM DISTRICTS J 'Isle of Capri $ 0 Ocbopee 0 Balance $ 0 AD VALOREM TAXES: Capital Revenue Fund $ 13,739,000 1: . (20% of 1.0000 mill) Subtotal Deficit of Restricted Revenue vs. Costs $(71,198,000) Proposed Revenues A. 7th Cent Sales Tax $128,000,000 B. General Obligation Bond for Regional Park 7,000,000 Surplus for Other Projects $ 63,802,000 b- OA CIE 42 r. BOOK C36 PAGE 267. Wkef:CIE PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLE MiTATION By the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulat- ions pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, appropriate land development regulations will be adopted and the following programs will be implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvements Element will be achieved or exceeded. 1. Building Permit Review As part of the review of all applications for building permits, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. 2. Development Order Review As part of the review of requests for all development orders having negative impacts on Category A Public Facilities other than building permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities is planned for completion concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development during the next five fiscal years. 3. Impact Fees impact faa ordinances will require tho same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy ZIA I.I.S. 4. Annual Budget The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. S. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvements Element. 6. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustments to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in April of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the county's budget process and the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections. The update will include: CIE - $3 BOOK C36 PaSr C DoJ1 :CIE 1. Revision of population projections 2. Updates of facility inventory 3. Update of unit costs 4. Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the service standards. 6. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. 7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis. In addition to the annual update, the County will perform an assessment of the status of the Capital Improvement Element in November of each year in conjunction with the release of the pre- liminary BEBR population estimates and projections. This analysis will include an assessment of the status of capital projects funded during the prior fiscal year along with an assessment of existing and projected service levels versus the adopted standards. 7. Con anrrency Management System The County shall establish by Ordinance and maintain a Concurrency Management System. The System shall consist of the following components: A. Annual monitoring report on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5. of this Element. The report shall summarize the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity will also be done. These forecasts will be based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. This annual report will constitute the evidence of the capacity and levels of service of public facilities for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following completion of the annual report. B. Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation programs 1 and 2 to enforce the requirements of Policy X13;%l 1.5.1. and 1.5.3 of this Element. CIE - 44 1004 GM- ►AIL 2 9 W r W.kef:CIE 1C) N, C. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. D. Concurrency Management implementation strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management implementation strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvements Element: 1. Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for county -wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. 2. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. 3. Levels of service are compared to adopted Standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case -by -case monitoring, for the following reasons: a. annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the County's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. 8. 5-Year Evaluation The required 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5-year evaluation include: A. Review of Annual Reports of the Concurrency Management System. b. Review of Semiannual Reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. C. Review of Annual Updates of this Capital Improve- ments Element, including updated supporting documents. CIE - 45 10K 036 PA,T 270 e i APPENDIX A PUBLIC FACILITIES MWIREMENTS First Update 1989/90 - 1993/94 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA CAPITAL IMP ELEMENT Prepared by office of Growth Management Spring, 1989 BOOK 036PA.E271 APPENDIX A PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS First Update 1989/90 - 1993/94 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Prepared by Office of Growth Management Spring, 1989 WYj _a I S .. 9�111• T� •f BOOK 036►vE272 Doc.Ref:RR- A.CIE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES i 3 1. INTRODUCTION I 4 c Purpose of This Study ` 4 Study Methodology ,.. 4 Data Collection and Analyses 5 Format of the Report 8 Compliance with State Regulations 13 2. CALCULATION OF PUBLIC FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 15 Arterial and Collector Roads- 16 Water Treatment Plants 21 Sewer Treatment Plants 25 Landfill 30 Emergency Medical Service 36 Fire Station 40 Jail 45 Library Buildings + 49 Library Collection 53 Government Buildings 56 Drainage i 60 Park and Recreational Facilities f 63 3. REVENUE FORECASTS 89 4. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS 92 S. COLLIER COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS 97 6. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMUNITIES 99 Spring, 1989 11h., -f - 2 - BOOK UIJ A _ Dcc.Ref: A. =IE APPENDIX A LIST OF TABLES .I. LEVEL OF SERVICE; ANALYSIS OF NEED Arterial and Collector Roads Water Treatment Plants Sewer Treatment Plant: Central County Sewer Treatment Plant: North County Sewer Treatment Plant: South County Solid Waste Solid Waste: Two Year Lined Cell Capacity Solid Waste: Ten Years of Raw Land Emergency Medical Services Isle of Capri Fire District Ochopee Fire District Jail Library Buildings Library Collection Government Buildings Drainage Parks &,-Recreation: II FACILITY INVENTORY Arterial and Collector Roads Water Treatment Plant Sewer Treatment Plant .Landfill Emergency Medical Services Fire Station and Apparatus Jail Library Buildings Library Collection Government Buildings •Drainage Park & Recreation Facilities III. COST COKPONENTS AND AVERAGE COST Arterial and Collector Roads Water Treatment Plant Sewer Treatment Plant Landfill Emergency Medical Services Fire Station and Apparatus Jail Library Buildings Library Collection Government Buildings Drainage Canal Parks & Recreation Spring, 1989 - 3 - BOOK 036 FACE 274 18 22 26 27 28 31 32 33 37 41 42 46 50 54 57 61 65 - 88 19 24 29 35 38 43 47 51 55 58 62 88 20 24 29 35 39 44 48 52 55 59 62 63 0 Doc.Ref:APP- A.CIE 1. INTRODUCTION I. PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY The purpose of this report is to use standards of service levels identified in the other elements of this plan to forecast the amount of public facilities that will be required in Collier County by 1993/94, including the costs of, and revenues for, the required facilities. In addition to the Public Facilities ntandards defined in the Growth Management Plan Elements this report includes objective, measurable standards for other facilities such -as Emergency Medical Services, Fire Stations, Jail, Library Buildings, Library Collection and Government Buildings. The intent of including these additional "Facility" standards in the analysis of need was to develop a comprehensive Capital Improvement Program for Collier County. This study is the foundation of the CIE. The study provides financially feasible standards of service which are used to calculate the type and amount of public facilities that are required during the next six years. In the second phase of developing the CIE, specific capital improvement projects are identified that provide the amount of public facilities that are specified in this study. The final phase of the CIE development consists of documenting the goals, objectives and policies that insure the adoption and implementation of public facilities concurrent with development. II. STUDY METHODOLOGY Given the statutory and regulatory requirement that the CIE be based on financially feasible, measurable standards of service levels for a period of at least five years, this study was developed in order to answer two questions: 1. What is the quantity of public facilities that will be required in 1993/947 2. Is it financially feasible to provide the quantity of facilities that are required in 1993/94? The answer to each question can be calculated by using objective data'and two formulas. Question 1. What is the quantity of public facilities that will be required in 1993/947 Formula 1.1: Demand X Standard = Requirement Spring, 1989 ft - 4 - aou 036 -_ ,t 275„ 0 Doc.Ref: M ZIE Where Demand is the estimated 1993/94 population (or other appropriate measure of need), and Standard is the amount of facility or service per unit of demand. Formula 1.2: Requirement - Inventory = Surplus/(Deficiency) Where Requirement is the result of Formula 1.1, and Inventory is the quantity of facility available as of September 30, 1989., Question 2. is it financially feasible to Provide the quantity of facilities that are required in 1993/94? Formula 2.1: Deficiency X Average Cost/Unit = $Deficiency Where Deficiency is the Result of Formula 1.2, and Average Cost/Unit is the usual cost of one unit of facility. Formula 2.2: $Deficiency - Revenue = $Surplus/(Deficiency) Where $Deficiency is the result of Formula 2.1, and Revenue is the money available for public facilities. The result of Formula 2.2 is the test of financial feasibility of the standards of service. A surplus of revenue over cost means the standard of service is affordable with money left over (the surplus), therefore the standard is financially feasible. A deficiency of revenue compared to cost means that there is not enough money to build the facilities, therefore is not financially feasible. III. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSES The calculations in this study provide answers to the questions and formulas described above. In order to perform the calculat- ions, six separate areas of data collection and analysis were investigated: (A) types of public facilities, (b) population and other demand factors, (C) standards for levels of service, (D) inventory of existing facilities, (E) average costs of new facilities, and (F) revenue sources. Spring, 1989 - 5 - �� cis►`�z�s r M M TYAes of Facilities. M Doc.Ref: APP-A.CIE Florida Statutes require the CIE to include " ... transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational, parks and recreational, and health systems and facilities." This study includes all of these facilities except education and health facilities that are not provided by the County. The regulations also require the CIE to include all the public facilities for which the County is financially responsible. The following types of public facilities are included in this study as a result of this regulation: jail, emergency medical service, dependent fire district stations and apparatus, libraries and other government buildings. If a type of public facility is not included in the CIE, the County is still permitted to expend money on such facilities, but such discretionary expenditures will have to compete with all the "mandatory" expenditures that maintain the standards of sorvice lcvols. B. Population and other Demand Factors The Collier County Planning Department prepared the population and housing data that are the basis for the demand factors contained in this study. The Planning Department started with the high - range forecasts by the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEER). High -range data was selected instead of mid -range projections because an analysis by the Planning Department shows that the County's actual growth rate corresponds to the high -range forecasts more than to the mid- range. The BEBR data is provided on a County -wide basis as of April 1st in five year increments (i.e., 1985, 1990, 1995 etc.). The County -wide forecasts were extrapolated from April 1st to October lat in order to coincide with the County's fiscal year. Linear extrapolations were used to estimate the population during intermediate years 1989 through 1994 in order to accommodate the time period of the CIE. The adjusted high -range forecasts were expanded for peak seasonal population for use with public facilities that are sensitive to seasonal population variations. Finally, the adjusted County -wide permanent population total was allocated three ways: urban vs. rural, incorporated vs. unincorporated, and among thirteen planning areas. (To date, there is no satisfactory methodology for allocating the peak seasonal population among urban/rural, incorporated/unincorpor- ated, or planning areas.) Appendix A summarizes the most significant population projections. Spring, 1989 M. - 6 - Vctf c 7 . 600K 0 H Doc.Ref: APP-A.CIE C. Standards for Levels of Service. A reference list of standards of service that are used or recommended by national and state agencies and professional associations, other Florida counties, and Collier County source documents were reviewed by Staff and the Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC) to the Collier County Planning Commission. In general, the standards selected by the CAC are from one of the following sources. 1. A standard adopted by Collier County in the existing comprehensive plan, or other official County study or publication (i.e., land development code, ordinance, engineering study, etc.). 2. A standard of a state agency or professional association, if recommended (with or without adjustment) by the appropriate department of Collier County government. 3. A "standard" developed from sorvice or the present ratio demand in Collier County. the existing level of facilities to The standard that is recommended for a public the "cover sheet" for the facility, and other be used as reference points are listed below standards. D. Inventory of Existing Facilities. facility appears on standards that can the recommended All Public facilities operated by Collier County were located and counted, and the inventories are summarized in this study. The inventory of existing facilities was extended through the and of the current fiscal year by adding any facilities that are planned, budgeted, under construction, and scheduled for completion by September 30, 1989. Facilities that will be completed after September 30, 1989 but before September 30, 1994, were also added to the inventory if the facilities are under construction pursuant to contracts authorized by the County. E. Average Costs of New Facilities. In order to test the probable financial feasibility of the standards of service prior to their adoption, and average cost per new facility is used in Formula 2.1, described above. The average costs were developed by the County department which is responsible for the facility. The results appear in a separate table of "Cost Components and Average Costs" that accompanies the calculation of Spring, 1989 - '7 - 600K - Doc.Ref:APP- A.CIE M each public facility's requirements. After standards of service are reviewed by the Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission, and they are adopted by the Board of County Comxaissionars, the County prepares specific capital improvement projects to fulfill the standards, and each project includes" detailed cost estimates which will replace the average costs,used in this study. F. Raygaue SouLces. Most counties have a few revenue sources that are regularly used for capital improvements, and others that are used for operating costs. Chapter 3, Revenue Forecasts, lists the revenue sources that Collier County can rely upon to pay for public facility capital improvements. Each revenue source is listed and an estimate of receipts is forecast for the period 1989/90 - 1993/94. rv. FORMAT OF THE REPORT This document represents the work in progress of an important phase in the development of the capital improvement element of Collier County's comprehensive plan. the report contains an analysis of public facilities that are provided by the County, including: recommendations for standards of service, forecasts of population and other indicators of demand for service, calculations of present and future requirements for additional facilities, summaries of inventories of existing public facilities, identification of surpluses and deficiencies of existing facilities compared to present and future requirements calculation of the costs of eliminating deficiencies, forecasts of revenue to pay for the facilities, and determination of the financial feasibility of the recommended standards of service. The report is primarily statistical in nature because of the use of objective, quantifiable standards of service that indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. The following narrative describes the format of the report. Spring, 1989 - 8 - 600K- 036 pprZ79 11 Doc.Ref: P.M.CIE The report is presented in four parts: (A) introduction,.(B) calculation of public facility requirements, (C) forecasts of revenue, and (D) analysis of the financial feasibility of the recommendations. ` A. "Introduction This introduction has presented the purpose, methodology, and data collection and analyses that produced the study. Following this description of the format of the report, the introduction will conclude with a list of state regulatory requirements that are fulfilled by this study. B. Calculation of Public Facility Requirements The calculation of requirements in Chapter 2 uses a standardized four-part format for each type of public facility: (1) population and standards, (2) calculations, (3) inventory, and (4) cost components and average costs. 1. Population and Standards The population and standards page begins with the "title" which identifies the name of the type of public facility that is analyzed. The "Population to be Served" identifies the "service recipient," the "service area," and the "service period." Usually all residents of the county receive the service in all areas of the county, but some facilities are provided to only part of the population and part of the geographical area of the county (i.e., utilities and fire stations). The service period indicates whether service is targeted for the permanent population, the peak seasonal population, or a weighted average of the two (8 months permanent, 4 months peak). The recommended standard of service for the facility is a numerical amount of service capacity per person (or other unit of demand, like a utility account). The standard indicates how much service each person is entitled to, or is likely to use, and it is the "Standard" in Formula 1.1, described above. The source of each standard is also listed. Immediately following the recommended standard is a list of standards from other sources that can be used for reference purposes. 2. Level of Service Standard:�ooaoovc�o� The second section of analysis provides calculations according to type of recipient and/or time period. The data at the bottom of the page is presented in seven columns, as follows: Spring, 1989 - 9 '- BOOK 036 PA,E 280 (1) (2) (3) (4) AMOUNT REQUIRED AMOUNT TIME POP- AT PLANNED PERIOD ULATION STANDARD IN CIP Dcc.Ref: APP-A.CIE SURPLUS OR VALVE AMOUNT DEFICIENCY.OR COST AVAILABLE AMOUNT $X.XXX/UNIT Column 1 is used to create a separate line of data and calculations for three time periods: (1) from now through the end of fiscal year (9/30/89), (2) the five fiscal years from October 1989 through September 1994, and (3) the second five year time frame from October 1994 through September 1999. These three time periods distinguish between the needs of current residents and those for future growth. Under column 1, the first line of data is for current residents as of the end of fiscal year 1988-89. This line establishes whether or not there is a deficiency of existing service compared to the recommended standard. The second line of data shows the additional facility requirements for growth that will occur during the next five years (October 1989 - September 1994). The total of the two groups (current residents + growth) is displayed on the next line of data. The fourth line of data shows the additional facility requirements for growth that will occur during the second five year period (October 1994-September, 1999) The total for all three groups is displayed on the last line. Column 2 shows the number of people or other demand factor (i.e., utility customer accounts). This number is the "Demand" in Formula 1.1, described above. The population or other demand factor will be allocated between present population and new growth, as described above. Column 3 shows the quantity of the facility that is needed to provide the standard of service to the populations. This "require- ment" is calculated by using Formula 1.1: multiply the Demand (i.e., population) times the Standard (i.e., service units per capita). The standard that appears in the heading for column 3 is the "Standard of Service" that was recommended on the population and standards page. Column 4 displays inventory anticipated to be added during 1987-88. Column 5 lists the amount of the public facility that is available for the present population (i.e., current facilities plus any planned for completion by 9/30/89, or contracted for completion before 9/30/94). This inventory of facilities is always attributed to the existing population, and is never shown on any data line for future growth. The data in column 4 is the "Inventory" in Formula 1.2, described above, and a full summary of the inventory is presented on the page following the calculations. Spring, 1989 10 - ijAT r. C c MM Doc.Ref: , M CIE Column 6 shows the surplus or deficiency of current facilities (column 5) compared to required facilities (column 3). The amount in column 6 is the "Surplus/(Deficiency)" calculated using Formula 1.2, and any deficiency is also the "Deficiency" in Formula 2.1, described above. If the requirement for a facility is less than its inventory, the County has more than enough facilities to meet the standard, and the extra facilities are counted as "Surplus." If the requirement is greater than the inventory, the shortage is listed in parentheses ( ) as a "(Deficiency)". The surplus/ deficiency for 9/30/89 is combined with the deficiency for 10/89 - 9/94 in order to arrive at the total surplus or deficiency as of September 30, 1994. In other words, a surplus of existing facilities will reduce or offset the deficiency caused by growth and any deficiency of existing facilities will be added to the deficiency caused by growth. Column 7 shows the cost to eliminate each deficiency (or the value of surplus public facilities). The average cost of one unit of facility (i.e., mile, gallon, ton, etc.) is listed in the column heading, and is itemized on the Cost Components and Average Cost page. The cost is the "Average Cost/Unit" in Formula 2.1, described above. The estimated cost of eliminating the deficiency is determined by Formula 2.1: multiply the Deficiency times the Average Cost/Unit. Any cost surplus/deficiency for 9/30/89 is combined with the deficiency for 10/89 - 9/94 in the same manner as column 6. The difference is that column 6 shows the quantity of the facilities, and column 7 shows the dollar cost. 3. Inventory The third section of the requirements analysis presents a summary of the inventory of existing public facilities. The "title" names the type of facility, and the "subtitle" indicates the unit of measurement (i.e., miles, gallons, tons, etc.) that is used to report the inventory. The data is presented in six columns, as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) IN PLACE & USABLE ADD I:I ADD IN AREA NAME & NO 9 30 88 1988-89 1989-90 TOTAL Column 1 lists the planning area or other service area names. Column 2 lists the planning area number. Column 3 counts the number of facilities that were in place and either in use or usable "as is" as of September 30, 1988. Spring, 1989 BOOK U36 ME 27sz ® Doc. Ref AWA. CIE �`,Column 4 counts the additional facilities that are included in ' the current fiscal year budget (1988-89) and which will be �t completed by September 30, 1989. Where appropriate, facilities that are contracted for completion after October 1, 1988, but 7, before September 30, 1994, are also included. These facilities r: are counted "in inventory" because their costs are already financed from existing revenues, therefore such facilities will not constitute and additional "cost" as shown on the calculations page. k' Column 5 counts the additional facilities that will be included If. in the 1989-90 budget and will be completed by September 30, 1990. Column 6 is the total usable facilities, the sum of columns 3 s^ through 5. The usable facilities in column 6 appear in the calculations of facility requirements as the inventory of j facilities that are presently available to meet the requirements of the standard of service (see column 5 on the level of service page). 4. Cost Components and Average Costs The final section of the analysis of each public facility is an itemized list of cost components and average costs. This page details the component parts of a "prototype" or "average" facility, and estimates the cost of each component. The data is presented in four columns, as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) # COST COST PER COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT COMPONENTS COMPONENT (2),X (3) Column 1 lists each component of the facility (i.e., land, "., construction, equipment, etc.). a":facility � Column 2 lists the number of components in the "avera -.. g (i.e., the number of acres of land at a water treatment plant). Column 3 gives the unit cost for components (i.e., the average cost of one acre of land). w Column 4 is used to display the results of calculations (i.e., the result of multiplying "X" acres of land by "SY" per acre). At the bottom of column 4 the total cost of the prototype facility is converted to a cost per unit. For example, the cost of a 4 million gallon per day (MGD) water treatment plan is divided by 4 MGD in order to estimate the cost per MGD. The cost per unit is the figure that is used in the calculations of facility require - Spring, 1989 -•. - 12 - mu BOOK 036 PA,,! 283 A , , 1119 M Doc.Ref: AM CIE ments to estimate the cost of eliminating any deficiency of public facilities compared to the requirement (see heading of column 7, 'level of service page). C- Revenue Forecasts The forecasts of revenue in Chapter 3 present the sources of revenue that Collier County can rely upon to finance its public facility capital improvements. Each source of revenue is described, and the basis for each forecast is given. D. Financial Feasibility Analysis The analysis of the financial feasibility of the recommendations appears in Chapter 4 as a comparison of the costs of required facilities (presented in Chapter 2), to the available revenue (forecast in Chapter 3). The calculation is performed using Formula 2.2, described above. If the revenue is greater than the cost, the recommended standards of service are financially feasible. If the cost exceeds the revenue, the standards of service are not financially feasible. In the event that a standard of service is not financially feasible, there -are four options available to the County: 1. Reduce the standard of service, which will reduce the cost, 2. Increase revenues to pay for the proposed standard of service (higher rates for existing revenues, and/or new sources of revenue), 3. Reduce the average cost (and possibly the quality) of the public facility, thus reducing the total cost, or 4. Any combination of options 1 - 3. V. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE REGULATIONS As part of the research conducted for this study, data was collected and analyses were performed that are required by Chapter 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code as part of the preparation of the CIE. This report contains summaries of data and analyses required by the following sections of Section 9J-5.016, FAC: Section (1) (c) requires an inventory of revenue sources and funding mechanisms available for capital improvements: see Chapter 3, Revenue Forecasts. Spring, 1989 6 - 13 - AWWA C�PA;;� M Doc.Ref:IMA.CIE Section (2) (b) requires an analysis of the general fiscal .'implications of existing deficiencies and future needs for each type of public facility: see the net value of surplus assets and net cost of required facilities for present populations, five years of growth and total population in column 7, "Value or (Cost)," of the table of calculations for each type of public facility. Section (2) (c) requires estimates of the costs of needed capital improvements and an explanation of the basis of the cost estimates: see the Cost Component and Average Costs table for each public facility. Parts of Section (3) require various objectives and policies dealing with adopted level of service standards: see the specific standards of service on each population and standards page and in the table of calculations for each public facility. Parts of Section (3) also require various objectives and policies dealing with the financial feasibility of the CIE, and the ability to make facilities available concurrent with development: see Chapter 4, Financial Feasibility Analysis. VI. CONCLUSION The Collier County Board of Commissioners formally adopted the original CIE of the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989. Chapter 163 Florida Statutes, requires that the CIE be updated annually. Rule 9-J5 of the Florida Administrative Code requires that the CIE cover a period of at least five fiscal years. As a result, the First CIE Update covers the period 1989/90 - 1993/94. �1 Spring, 1989 - 14 - SOCK 036 WE 85 m Doc.Ref: MR.CIE 2. CALCULATION OF PUBLIC FACILITY REQUIRMUNTS 0 Spring, 1989 604K - 15 - .1k Doc.Ref:- —A.CIE COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROARS POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPT MDER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: County -wide Other: 3. Service Period: Permanent Population = 186,348 Peak Period Population = 255,964 X Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,322 STANDARD OF SERVICE: County arterial and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated " " below on the basis of peak hour, peak season traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roadways: Road From - To Airport Road Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road to Santa Barbara Blvd. x� Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway to U.S. 41 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road to I-75 Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season shall be maintained on all other County arterial and collector roads, however, any section of road may operate at Level of Service "Ell for a period not to exceed two fiscal years following the determination of Level of Service "E" in order to provide the County with time to restore Level of Service "D" by making appropriate improvements. Rule of Thumb: mileage equivalent of LOS = 0.00424 lane miles per capita (1) Source of Standard: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Spring, 1989 - � S - 16 - aooK 036 P►��� 287 Doc. Ref : .,. CIE Other Standards for Refence -Standard Source 0.004 lane mi/capita Current Level of Collier County Service (1) LOS C Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2) LOS D Collier County Impact Fee Ordinance (3) LOS C rural, LOS D urban Florida DOT Transportation Plan (4) Expressways 80% or more E LOS Non -expressways 70% or more 8 LOS LOS D Seminole County (5) LOS C off-season/ Lee County CIP (6) LOS D season wY (1) 676 lane miles/148,722 weighted average population 0 9/30/87 (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan, p.29. Arterial LOS benchmark for land use point rating system. (3) Ordinance 85- , Collier County. (4) Florida DOT: Appendix A. Florida Transportation Plan, 1986, pp. -8, 0-1, 74. (5) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986. (6) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.9, based on local data. i T_ Spring, 1989 1C 194Knq PAII 17 - ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 0.00424 LANE RILES/CAPITA POPULATION LANE MILES LANE MILES LANE MILES SURPLUS! VALUE OR FISCAL CO -WIDE REQUIRED PLARKEEO AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) ICOSTI AT .+ YEAR MEI8NTE1 AVG. 0.00421 IN CIP 1461,000 81-18 156143 662 _ 764.4 102.4 47,820,600 08-11 166162 704.5 5.8 770.2 65.7 - 30,611,100 B4-90 17529t 743.3 $0.2 830.4 87.1 40,673,700 ' 90-11 1831"m 779.3 17.2 847.6 69.3 37,363,100 91-12 191811 813.3 It.6 85t.2 45.1 21,435,300 l2-43 201061 BS2.S 5.2 864.4 11.9 5,557,300 93-94 201322 881.5 864.4 (23.1) (10,787,700) 94-95 216008 924.4 164.4 (60.0) (28,020,000) 45-16 - 227122• •963 • 864.4 (48.6) (46,046,200) 16-t1 236231 1001.6 864.4 (137.2) (64,012,400) t7-tt 245SSS 1040.3 164.4 I11S.t1 ' I82,115,3401 j 254476 1071 864.4 1214.6) 1100,211,200)• 19-00 26.;702 1118.1 864.4 (253.7) ►118,411,900) , ' LANE MILES LANE RILES LANE MILES SURPLUS/ - VALUE OR POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) ""' (COST) AT TIME PERIOD (WEIGHTED 06.) 0.00424 IN CIP 5467,000tLANE MI. r PRESENT TO V "�`"��•1 1130114 175244 743.3 66.0 130.4 17.1 40,673,700 x• S YEAR GROWTH 10190-1/93 42709 161.1 34.0 34 1147.1) (68,695,700) 5-YEAA $U1T0TAl 219001 124.4 100.0 164.4 00.01 (21,020,000) „ 2" S-TR GROWTH 45694 193.7 0.0 0.0 (193.1) (90,457,900) 10 YEAR TOTAL r 101W1100 263702 1118.1 100.0 664.4 1253.7) (110,477,9001 NOTES The unit cost was determined by dividing the sus of the total estimated costs of the individual projects - by the sus of the total lane miles of the projects. - 18 - WOOK 289 Doc.Ref: -.,.CIE SUM4ARY OF ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD INVENTORY (Lane Miles) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE 0 ADD BY ADD BY USABLE PLAN AREA NAME & NO. 9 30 88 9 30 89 9 30 90 TOTAL r:. '- North Naples 1 76.8 5.8 24.4• 107.0 Central Naples 2 72.8 8.8 . 81'.6 Golden Gate 3 81.2 5.6 86.8 "'East Naples 4 32.4 32.4 .-South Naples 5 19.8 6.8 26.6 Marco 6 55.8 • 55".8 Royal Faka-Palm 7 64.8 64.8 Creek 3 :_ Rural Estates 8 31.4 31.4 Urban Estates 9 99.2 99.2 `�►� Corkscrew 10 138.6 11.4 150.0 Imuokalee it 29.4 3.2 32.6 Big Cypress 12 62.2 _ 62.2 Countywide Total 764.4 5.8 60.2 830.4 * Includes County arterials and collectors, excludes State and Federal roads. Spring, 1989 - 19 - a SOCK 036 ?zt'490 - Doc.Ref: MY CIE COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD COST CODTONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS AVERAGE URBAN RURAL COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT SECTION SECTION (2) + (3) A. Design 34,000 27,000 $ 30,000 B. Right of Way 53,000 75,000 65,000 C. Construction (1) 340,000 272,000 303,000 -F. Other (2) 72,000 66,000 69,000 AVERAGE COST PER LANE MILE "467 000 (1) Includes culverts and bridges - also applies to both arterial and collector costs. (2) Includes lighting, sidewalks, bikepaths and administrative/overhead costs. Spring, 1989 20 Dom 036291 '4 I 0 Doc. Ref : XW CIE WATER SERVICE AREA TREATMENT PLANTS * POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEP'1Z0!BER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: 2. Service Area: 3. Service Period: All County Residents X Other: Water Customers Countywide X Other: Water System Permanent Population X Peak Period Population _ Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 85,575** STANDARD OF SERVICE: 135 gal/day/capita plus 21% for non-residential Source of Standard: Utilities Division, based on Water Master Plan (1) and on historical ratios of residential and non-residential water consumption Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 100 gdpc*** Lee County CIP (2) 125 gdpc 6 County region (S.W. Fla) (3) 100 gdpc Seminole County (4) fire flow**** Seminole County (4) 144 gdpc Florida Governor's Office (5) 125 gdpc Sipe and Starnes (5) * Includes wells and storage tanks ** Peak seasonal population based on U of F upper range projections. Includes County Water/Sewer District and proposed expansions. Excludes Marco Water/Sewer District and Goodland Water District. *** gdpc = gallons per day per capita **** fire flow = 500 qpm residential Z 1250 gpm commercial, institutional or industrial. (1) Phase I Water Master Plan for Western Collier Count October 1985, p.41. (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.200, (based on local engineering standard). (3) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Commission, "Economic Views," v.10, n.2, February 1986. (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986. (5) Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Needs: 1990 and 2000. Chapter 3. Spring, 1989 - 21 - 100K 036""t 292 PIP WATER TREATKENT PLANTS LEVEL OF SERVICE STAROARD: 135/6MCAPIT9 PLUS 211 )ON -RESIDENTIAL POPULATION mso mso MSD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE IDEFICIENCY) (COST) AT Tag SERVICE AREA 0.00024500 IN CIP S1,633,930 17-18 64082 15.70 17.75 2.05 3,739,537 88-89 67664 16.60 14.23) 13.50 13.10) (5,685,183) 89-" 71246 17.50 13.50 (4.001 (7,335,720) 90-91 74828 19.30 9.00 21.50 3.20 5,868,576 9142 78411 11.70 21.50 2.30- 4,218,039 92-93 11992 20.10 21.30 1.40 2,547,302 II_ It 85575 71.00 21.50 0.50' 9161965 94-95 09773 72.00 21.50 (0.501 (916,961) 13-96, 93973 23.00 21.50 11.50) (2,730,093) 91-97 98175 24.10 21.30 (2.601 14,769,2181 9748 102375 25.10 21.50 13.60) 16,602,1401 9849 106M 26.10 '21.50 (4.601 18143610701_ '1 99-00 110775 27.10 21.50 (5.60) 116,270 1 '008 POPULATION mso ASD 8611 SURPLUS/ VALUE DR. COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) _(COST) AT TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA 245/CAPITA IN CIP PRESENT TO 9130190 71246 17.50 (4) 13.50 (4.00) (7,335,7201 MWR 10/90-9ns 18521 4.50 8 0.00 3.50 -61418,733 4 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 09775 22.00 1 21.50 mw (914,y651. 5_TR GROWTH 21000 5.10 0 0.00 15.16 '(9,333,043) 10 YEAR TOTAL 10190-9/00 110773 27.10 4 21.30 (5.601 110,270,9001 - 22 tooK 036 p'99 - ris Z 3 � s Doc.Ref: ".:IE FURTHER NOTES REGARDING WATER TREATMENT PLANT REQUIRMIENTS >taadard of service = 135 gdpc + 21% for non-residential, which :otals 163.485 gdpc. The standard is multiplied times 1.5 to .ncorporate peak design factor of 50%: 163.485 x 1.5 - 245 gdpc. )oes not include water purchased from the City of Naples, available until January 1, 1990, which will be replaced by the expansion of the South County Regional Plant. '.xisting "deficiency" is met by private utilities which may be phased ot�t by future County capacity increases. Deficiencies and :oats are the exact amount required as of 9/30/94. Utility planning requires the development of larger scale facilities in order to provide for needs beyond 1994-. A Spring, 1989 - 23 - 500K 036 PA ,! 294 a Doc.R=PP-A.CIE C SUKKARY OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT INVENTORY (millions of gallons per day) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE ADD BY ADD BY USABLE AREA NAME 6 NO. P 9 30 89 9 30 89 9 30 90 TOTAL Water Service Area 17.75 (4.25) 13.50 WATER TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (1) (2) (3) (4) 0 COST COST PER COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT COMPONENTS COMPONENT (2) x (3) 10 MGD Treatment Plant A. Treatment Plant (MOD) 10 $ 10,156,590 B. Design (i of plant) 10,156,590 17% 1,726,620 C. Land (acre) 14 22,326 312,564 (5) TOTAL COST 12,195,774 ( 6 ) MGD IN PLANT (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD �.,I 111,219,577 .} '. (5)/(6) 15 MGD Wellfield A. Equipment (well) 15 4,460,985 B. Design (% of wall) 4,460,985 17% 758,36T (5) C. Land (acre) 0.215 36,000 TOTAL COST 7.740 '.,227,092 (6) MGD IN WELLFIELD 15 (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD 348,473 (5)/(6) 10 MGD Storage Tank A. Structure (tank) 1 2,177,066 B. Design (t of tank) 2,177,066 17% 370,101 ( 5 ) C. Land (acre) 5 22,326 TOTAL COST 111,630 '-1, (6) MGD IN STORAGE TANK 658-, 797 10'`° (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD 265,880 TOTAL FACILITY COST PER MGD Treatment Plant 1,219,577 Well 348,473 Storage Tank Cost MGD 265,880 1,833,9300 per z Spring, 1989 s• - 24 - e00K 036 P►cf '11-95 Doc.Ref: APP-A.CIE SEWER SERVICE AREA TREATPCSNT PLANTS * POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTMMER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: 2. Service Area: 3. Service Period: All County Residents X Other: Sewer Customers Countywide X Other: Sewer System Permanent Population X Peak Period Population __.. Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = North 31,121 South 62,948 STANDAM OF SERVICE: 100 gal/day/capita plus 21♦ for non-residential Source of Standard: Utilities Division, based on Sewer Master Plan (1) and historical ratios of residential vs.non-residential water consumption. Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 100 gdpc** Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2) 180 gdpc Lee County CIP (3) 34 gdpc Union County (lowest in Fla) (4) 510 gdpc Nassau County (highest in Fla) (4) 122.5 gdpc Governor's Office: state average (4) 100 gdpc 6 county region (S.W. Fla) (5) 100 gdpc Seminole County (6) * Includes effluent disposal facilities ** gdpc = gallons per day per capita (1) South County Sewer Master Plan. May 1986, p. VIII-6. (2) Co or County Com rehans va Plan. p.215. Reference to benchmark used in 1120111 plan. (3) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91. p.208 (based on local engineering standard). (4) Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Needs: 1990 and 2000. Chapter 4, (based on 85% of Fla average water consumption of 144 gdpc). (5) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Council, "Economic Views," v.10,n.2, February 1986. (6) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986. Sprinq, 1989 - 25 - 600K 036 P� �� 296 r: Ll OUR TREATMENT PLANTS CENTRAL COUNTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STAND M 100/SPD/CAPITA PLUS 21.1% NON-RESIDENTIAL POPULATION AGO Ago Ago SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) AT YEAR SERVICE AREA 121 IN CIP .(COST) 17-88 1619 0.2 0.0 (0.21 (598,6711 68-09 1701 012 0.0 (0.21 (629,203) 89-" 1763 0.2 0.0 (659,5331 W91 1965 0.2 0.0 (0.2) (697166n "ASK S fo.,�91 1941 0.2 r *0-0 4JQ-2J. ArlV,,i?20iS61) 12-13 2030 0.2 0.0 (0.2) (750,901) - RI 93e-94: 2112 0.3 0.0 (0.3) (781,2331 "i819,702) Yra 94-13 2216 0.3 0.0 mm 2320 0.3 0.0 (0.3) QU, 172) Ae 96-97 2424 0.3 -0.0 (0.3) (896,642) 97-91 :2521 0.3 0.0 (0.31 (933,112) 98-" 2632 0.3 0.0 10.3) (973,582) 99-00 27U 0.3 0.0 (0.3). -(1,012,0511 POPULATION COUNTY No REQUIRED ROD PLANNED No AVAILABLE SURPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) VALUE OR (COSTf AT TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA 121/CAPITA IN CIP PRESENT TO 9130/90 1763 0.2 0.0 0.0 (0.2) (659,533) 5 YEAR SROM 0190-9/75 433 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.11 (160,1671 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 2216 0.3 0.0 0.0 291 5-YR SROVTX 520 0.1 0.0 0.0 (0,11 (192,3471 40 YEAR TOTAL 10190-9/00 2736 0.3 0.0 0.0 (0.3) (11012,0511 74� - 26 S M 297 OOK Lrj SEWER TREATMENT PLANTS NORTH COUNTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1001GPD/CAPITA PLUS 21% NON-RESIDENTIAL POPULATION NO HGO AGO SURPLUS/ VALUE OR Tv9A COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (MST) AT YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000121 IN CIP $3,057,040 67-68 22131 2.7 2.5 (0.20) (611,408) 88-99 23629 2.9 2.5 10.401 (1,222,8161 89-90. 25127 3.0 2.0 4.5 1.50 4,585,560 W91 26626 3.2 4.5 1.30 3,974,132:-' 91-92 18124 3.4 -1.5 1.10 3,3b2,744 92-93 29623 3.6 2.0 6.5 2.90 1,065,414 93�44 31121 3.8 6.5 2.70 1,254,008 9 4-" 32680 4.0 6.5 1.50 7,642,600,11:1 34254 4.1 63 2.44 7,336,876", 16-97 35621 4.3 .6.5 2.20 61775,480 97-" 37387 4.5 6.5 2.00 6,1I4,080 98-" 38954 4.7 6.5 1.90 5,502,672 99-00 40521 4.9 6.5 1.60 4,691,264 POPULATION AGO AGO Nil SURPLUS/ t VALUE OR COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT IINE PERIOD SERVICE AREA 121/CAPITA IN CIP $3,057,040 PRESENT TO 25127 3.0 2.0 4.5 1.5 4,583,56f, 5 YEAR GROWTH 0 7561 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3,037,040 YEAR SUBTOTAL 32669 4.0 4.0 6.5 2.5 0 7,642,60,.' 0 2XI 5-YR GROWTH 7833 0.9 0.0 0.0 (0.91 (2,731,3361 'YW TOTAL, 001W9100 40571 4.1 4 7 1.60 4,811,264 27 !j too( G3,6pAfr.z9g kl I SEVER TREATMENT PMs SOUTH COUNTY LEVEL OF SERVICE S7AXDARDi 100/6PD/CAPITA PLUS 21% NON-RESIDENTIAL POPULATION No mso MGD SURPLUS/ VALUE CR FISCAL, COUNTY REQUIRED FLAWED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000121 IN CIP $3,037,040 67-8e 48883 5.4 3.3 (2.0 (71948,304) 80-99 51227 6.2 3.1 (2.11 (8,665,416). 17-10 53571 6.5 3.3 712,529): wit 55115 6.8 4.7 1.0 50256 7.0 -1.0 1.0 3,057,040 ?2-13 60602 7.3 4.0 12.0 4.7 14,368,088- 13-14 62946 7.6 12.0 4.4 13,450,176,, 65906 8.0 12.0 4.0 ;. 12 221,160 12.0 3.7 11:311 048 96-", 71625 8.7 .12.4 3.3 to oes z3f, 97-" 74784 9.0 12.0 3.0 9,171,120 98-" 77744 9.4 12.0 2.6 7,948,304.' 94-00 80704 7.0 12.0 2.2. 6,725,488- PWULAIION A60 mso Ego SURPLUS/ -VALUE OR COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) '.(COST) AT TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA 1211CAPITA IN CIP $3,057,040 PWIXT TO 53571 5 YEAR 69M 12333 SWTOTAL 65906 2KO 5-YR 60M 14798 10 YEAR TOTAL 10190-9/00 807H 6.5 0.0 3.3 (f, 722, $28) 1.5 8.7 8.7 7.2 22,010,688 0.0 8.7 12.0 4.0 12,728,160 1.8 0.0 (0.01 11.61 (5,502,672) 1.0 1.7 12.0 28 - BOOK 03 . 6PA,,!299 2.2 1,723,490 �z - Doc -Ref: -= CIE SUMdARY OF SEWER TREATMENT PLANT INVENTORY f;s (million gallons per day) r (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE ADD BY ADD BY USABLE AREA NAME & NO. Q 9 30 88 9 30 89 9 30 90 TOTAL North 2.5 2.5 South 3.3* p ! Existing interim facilities to be phased out by 1992 upon completion of South County Regional Treatment Plant. ' S15MR TREATMENT PLANT CPST C011PONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS �• (2) (3) (4) A COST COST PER COST/FACILITY a" COST COMPONENT COMPC;NENTS COMPONENT (2) x (3) r 10.5 MGD Treatment Plant A.Treatment Plant(MGD) 10.5 $1,750,000 $ 18,375,000 B.Design (1 of plant) 18,375,000 17% 3,123,750 N: C.Land (acre) 60 12,799 767,940 (5) TOTAL COST 22,265,690 ' fw� (6) MGD IN TREATMENT PLANT 10.5 . (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD 2,120,637 (5)/(6) 11 MGD System Effluent Disposal m• A.Percolation Pond Land 2 294,667 589,334 ( MGD ) B.Effluent Distribution 9 912,717 8,214,453 (MGD), C.Design (% of above) 8,803,787 17% 1,'4d96,644 .TOTAL COST 10 300 431 (6) MGD SYSTEM EFFLUENT 11 DISPOSAL (7) . AVERAGE COST PER MGD 9.3 6 , 403 ` ". :,t-TOTAL -FACILITY COST PER MGD Treatment Plant 2,120,637 Effluent Disposal 936,403 ti Total Cost per MGD 3,057,040 Spring, 1989 , 29 - 600K 036 PA'[ 300 �_'' ;# I A Doc.Ref:MA.CIE LANDFILL - POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: X Countywide Other: 3. Service Period: _ Permanent Population = 186,348 Peak Period Population = 255,964 X Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,32.2 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 1.55 tons of solid waste/capita/year, and 2 years capacity of lined cells, and 10 years capacity of raw land Source of Standard: Mid -range of 5 year forecast by Solid Waste Dept. CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee Standard 1.40 tons/capita/year 1.14 tons/capita/year 1.095 tons/capita/year 1.00 tons/capita/year Other Standards for Reference Source Current Level of County Service (1) Lee County CIP (2) 6 county region (S.W. Fla) (3) Seminole County (4) (1) 200,000 tons/year/142,498 weighted average pop.~! 9/30/86 (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91. p.220, (based on 1986 service level). (3) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Council, "Economic,Views," v.10, n.2, February 1986. (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986. U r.s a.. f H", D✓ ' Spring, 1989 wr - 30 - EOOK O3fi 1 F, I Will HASTE LEVEL OF UAVICE STANWh 1.35 TOWCAPITA PONUT I ON KIIIMI96 CAPACITY CAPACITY musl ym CAPACITY KM Flim M-WIK CAPACITY AmItEl "in OEFICIEXM MST AT Actomy go LOS YEAR K16CEP AK. AVAILAKE 1.3304 11 OF 0.00 twillo 17-11 154143 3,400,117 242,022 3,151,153 ll,1S3,712 137'm 0.1 -57,Ml 3,00'"3 11,01i'357 274,117 1.7 H-tf In?" 2,117,214 li,303,511 1.0 I13554 2,711,264 214,5" 2,432,753 14,31i,521 1.0 fl-n 113111 2,432,755 217"307 2,113,441 12,112,111 0.0 12-f3 201"1 2,135,441 311,44: 1'123,103 10,142,111 0.0 13-" 201322 324,441 1,4",rA 1,114,124 0.0 94-15 21601 1,411,,-54 337,112 1,161,442 6,96i'm 9.0 "6 227122 1,111,442 357,031 101,403 4,156,413 0.0 236231 601,403 U6, 161 40,234 2,1!1,402 0.0 17-f1 20315 443,234 310,300 12,933 377,i40 6.0 fl-" 254476 62,933 314,438 13:1,3441 (1,111,027) 1.0 261702 (331,504) 401,738 9744,2431 14,441,4541 0.1 `i. "PULATIOX XIIWIN6 CAPACITY CAPACITY $Ifitnus/ VALUE/ i 1 M-91K CAPACITY REIVItEl PLANNEI IKFItIE)IM cost Al 111K PLAIN Klairl Avg. AVAILAKI 1.5500 IN CIP 20 YEAR Lm 14.01104 "IS10 is 1732" 2, M, 177 271,714 2,717,264 16,303,511 I nu $10171 ft,5:3,1221 (1,334,1111 5-na "MAP 21"" 1,4",354 337,912 1,161,442 1,961,131 20 3-12 OWN 45494 10,121 11,901,6141 111,410,1051 aTK 10 YEAR TITAL lo10•fIm sm II3I,5041 401,734 (744,243) 14,411,04) - 31 - o OOOK %jnu6pAr 3mo vf.l Ball TASTE LM V RATICt StUSAU? 1.33 TM/CAPITA 110 YEARS LIKI CELL CAPACITY POPULATION MINIMS CAPACITY 2" YEAR CAPACITY swtusl VXVE/ CAPACITY ACTUAL FISCAL. cc-liff CAPACITY REQUIRED CAPACITY PLANNED ISEFICIENCY) COST AT ACMALLT USES LOS YEAR 1116all Am AVAILAKI 1.11500 p(guitEl IN Cl/ 291 YEAR LOSS 11.09 PROVIDE) 17-01 IUM 11M2,11l 242,022 412,141 4,013,141 0.1 Wilt 116112 1,014'1" 211,114 1,031'331 1,332,146 tosil't" 274,4i1 1.7 1712" 1,101.714 211,714 214'5" 11250,542 1,543,251 1.0 IS= 1,535,m 211,501 217,301 1,112,211 2,133,440 12,112,484 0.1 IfIllI 2,431.,155 217,307 311,643 1,123,103 10,1142,117 0.0 17_13 201041 2,113,441 311,643 324,441 1,491,334 1'1f6,124 4.0 13-14 201122 1,123'sol 324,441 337.112 1'111,442 6.141,654 6.4 f4 2110" 352,0" 101,403 4,t31,413 0.0 15-91 min 1,111,442 117,411 344,111 443,234 2j4V,412 1.0 34i'lli 300, us li'm sli'm ("I'sou (I't11,0271 0.4 Tl-" ZA 171 0X2 314,434 401,731 (740,2431 (4,441,4561 0.0 PmAtION K610116 CAPACITY 214 YEAR CAPACITY rimml VALIKI WNIK CAPACITY 1119110 CAPACITY PLANES rOUICIENCY) COST AT TIRE MIN VEIMTEI AVS. MILAM 1.350 AtIVIKII Is CIP M TtAA LOSS 14.011011 WOM 115211 1,101.764 211,714 nu 11071 17,531 1441,1311 12,441,1341 1-1m 10TVAL 2100 mjv 101'03 41956,415 24 5-1,11 SAWN 45694 II.)30,m) 70,126 ",?o 11,110,6431 III'vi'm tl nAR TITIL li'lty'an 32 BOOK 036 w!3033 F-1 :; , .j 7 .3\`• 1 r' 1 yrr`F, "i. Y� " 5�3N,y IS-Ap-l1 sau 1Asrl LEVEL Or SMICE lIWUh Ln T0161CA/ITA TEN TEARS V AM LMI, AMS /1MITIOR ►04NLA1111 Kul LM LARI RAN LAWS AM OW1.111 VIEW rIKX Cl-11K TEN TEM KOOIM KNIS Am KANG (Krlcimn COST AT TEAR K1PrTE1 M. TOTAL AMRMIIT MORE REWIAEI 11 OF 11/-IEARs lW1 t21,IN 17.81 134141 1164720 22.1 286.3 1 M-n RM2 milli 24.2 320.0 211.3 3" 20.3 4",043 n-14 1732" 2I4no 2m 113.1 312.4 M.3 . 3,►4►,111 1M1 TOM 2211441 26.1 170.2 323.3 11•12 111111 2321131 21.1 $41.4 331.4 Sq.l 4,111,211 »-13 211061 24114tt 21.3 s11.3 331.4 143.1 3,217,3n 11.14 201322 M340 scs 414.1 N4.1 121.3 2,426,711 t4-13 7110" n1w 31.0 4333 371.2 77.4 1,344,601 13-16 227122 2NST01 33.1 421.1 311.7 na 641,111 1"7 Mill 2771114 34.3 310.7 113.1 I14.71 1214,4130 .. 17-11 24sm .173024 33.1 334.2 411.7 1►3.11 I1,24t,I3A 11-11 234471 2171211 37.1 320.1 433.3 1112.11 12,237,7123 1111-7000 263742 3041121 31.3 213.3 441.3 1114.2) 13,214,1SA 0"1 213434 11-41 712372 02-43 ti1111 03-41 30111A 3ION1 IS 04 321147 IH7 33t341 p N 341630 N M 3511" M 11 341167 ► MATION 1MNLAII101 AM 10111 LAN LAM L11R1 ACRES pRlmw Chan TEN Tull RE1111RE1 SAM RLTIES KAMV wICI1lR1'1 WST K TIRE ►ERIOI E11NTE1 IVS. TOTAL SOMALI AIAILAILE REWiREI 11 CII Ill TTM1 LAD 121,110/ACNE MEAT Tt r31n/ 171211 2142244 23.1 313.1 SIM W.3 3,4SI,711 . TEAR 010111 1/11-1m 42701 430122 6.2 I140.21 AM 1203.» t4,121,tm -TEAR OIMTOTAL 211001 2313M 31.1 433.4 2T1.2 71.4 I^ip ■ 3-TN WIN 43N4 47un 6.7 117.2.31 41.4 wim 14,p2,74rd� 1 TEAR TOTAL /1/ 1701 243112 106" 31.3 203.3 447.3 (114.21 0,214.= lk i 33 soox 0361.304 Doc.Ref: AFP-A.CIE 1. 2. 3. LANDFILL ASSUMPTIONS Total acreage of the Naples Landfill is 320 acres. For surplus/deficiency calculations; all the solid waste collected throughout the County was placed in the Naples landfill. The existing operation permit is based on a Cell 6 capacity of 3.4 million tons and reflects the true present permitted capacity remaining on the site. If the assumption is going to be made that the mining program is a certainty then, it can alto be assumed that all non -degraded residues and surplus earthen materials will be recycled, allowing the existing site to serve perpetually. Therefore, the available capacity reflects the existing permitted capacity of 3.4 million tons. Projection which indicated true present capacity: Gross tons per acre is based on a design of 90' cell height using one square foot of lined area to contain one ton of waste; Cells constructed with 3:1 side slopes. Cell 6 - Phase I 1,182,213 Tons Capacity Phase II 1,036,551 Tons Capacity Phase III 1,182,213 Tons Capacity Spring, 1989 - 34 - toR �36 Pa =305 0 Doc.Ref: Sm.:IE SUMMARY OF LANDFILL 2NVENTORY (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE ADD BY ADD'BY' `USABLE' MM NAME i NO. ! 9/30/88 9 30 89 9 30 90 TOTAL Countywide 1,044,880 1,036,551 2,081,431 (lined cell/tons) Countywide 320 300 620 (raw land acres) LANDFILL COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (1) (2) COST COST COMPONENT COMPONENTS �. One Acre Cell A. Design . B. Equipment r C, V, , . fir' C. Cell base liner D. Closure .Ei - -Post Closure F. Leachate treatment ...,�-(5) 'TOTAL COST (6) TONS IN ONE ACRE CELL (7) AVERAGE COST PER ton (5)/(6) G. Land: 20,000/acre divided by 43,560 tons/acre f TOTAL AVERAGE COST PER TON Spring, 1989 - 35 - BOOK 036 Pa'S 3•Q6 (3) (4) COST PER COST/FACILITY COMPONENT (2) X (3) $ 2,000 45�000 •114300 20,000 ;b00 5.000 `-�241•300} t�•�ts>-s1 43,560 �. 5.54 0.46 6.00 41 11 IVA �:., . {$ EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE -#POPULATION TO BZ SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2Service Area: X Countywide " Other: 3. Service Period: X Permanent Population Peak Period Population Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak STANDARD OF SERVICE: Rule of thumb: Source of Standard: = 186,348 = 255,964 = 209,322 6 minute or less mean average response time between call for service and arrival at scene for emergency responses to or in major population centers of Collier County 0.00006 EMS units/capita (1) Director of Emergency Medical Services Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 0.00005 EMS stations/capita Current Collier County Service Average (2) 0.00003 EMS stn/capita Lee County current ratio (3) 0.0650 EMS calls/capita Lee County current call load (4) ,714.:198 response time in the City of Naples was approximately the standard of service (actually 5.72 minutes), therefore the ratio of ,EMS units to Naples population is presumed to provide the level of service of 6 minute response time. Naples service units in 1986 = 1.19 units (365 calls in Naples/307 average calls per unit Countywide). Naples population in 1986 = 18,343. Therefore, 1.19 units/18,343 population = 0.00006 units/capita. (2) 6 stations/132,084 population @ 9/30/87 (3) Ration of Lee County 1986 peak population to EMS stations. (4) M.G. Lewis Econometrics memorandum re Lee County development project "The Parklands," 10/17/85. �A. 40.6 piing, 1989 J , - 36 BOOR OJII hJ L I EMS LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 0. 00006 UNITSICAFITA EMS UNITS EMS UNITS EMS UNITS SURPLUS! VALUE OR nmmoi REWIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) 1COST)'AT (CO -WIDE FEAR) 0.00006 IN CIP y. 11-68 ~y 1389W N 8.0 1.0 8.0 0.0 0 H-P 140050 9.0 0.0 (1.01 (325,9001 it 154348 9.0 1.0 9.0 0.0 -4 9 041 163845 10.0 1.0 10.0 0.0 0 11-92 171345 10.0 10.0 0.0 0 12-11 178846 11.0 10.0 (1.0) (323,9001 13-14 186348 11.0 1.0 11.0 0.0 0 14-73 194231 12.0 11.0 (1.0) (323,1001 15-11* 202515 12.0 11.0 (1-01 (321,1001 1" 210794 13.0 111.0 (2.0) 431,600) 17-" 219075 13.0 11.0 (2.0) (631,600) 9" 727358 11.0 11.0 (3.01 (917,700) 99-00 230738 14.0 11.0 (3.0) (977,7001 EMS UNITS ENS UNITS EMS UNITS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT TIME PERIOD ICO-VIDE PERM) 0.00006 11 CIP 1325,900 PROM TO Pr 9/30190 156341 9.0 2.0 9.0 0.0 0 5 YEAR WITH 378" 3.0 M 2.0 (1.01 (323,900) 3 TEM ANTOTAL 174238 12.0 4.0 11.0 (1.01 (525,"Q) 2 -YR L W 5 X 41500 2.0 0.0 0.0 (2.01 (631'e001 If YEAR TOTAL f '10110-1/00 235738 14.0 4.0 11.0 (3.01 (977,700) NOTES The unit east includes the cost of the station, EMS units, Lid asoCilted station equ)plent. - 37 - BOOK 036 w-308* SUMMARY OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVI, -.+ (units) . (1) +ff (2) (3) (4) l4..' {' PLAN AREA NAME & NO. USABLE @ 9 30/88 ADD BY 9 30 89 t North Naples 1 2 ;.:,.Central Naples 2 1 9. Golden Gate 3 1 y East .Naples 4 1 S4uth'Naples 5 :Marco 6 `Royal Faka-Palm iy Creek 7 'Rural Estates 8 �tUrban Estates 9 I� . 7 5) (6) D BY USABLE 0 90 TOTAL 2 I 1 2 1 iiwuvnaiecs 1t l 2 ` Q•. . Big Cypress 12 Countywide Total 8 9 1 '' 06 } ie rr ,Spring, 1989` :w' - •38 - <s - ,j• i' 1 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (1) (2) (3) (4) COST COST PER COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT COMPONENT/SECTION SECTION (2) x (3) A. Vehicle 1 65,000 $ 65,000 r;e_B. Building (square feet) 2,750 55 151,300 Design (% of building) 151,300 1.05% 1,600 D. Furniture (rooms) 3 25,003 7,500 E.---Equipment 1 24,000 .24,000- _T; Land (1/2'ac're) 1 75,000- '1�15,000 G. Appraisal Fee 1 1,500 11500 I'. AVERXGE COST PER EMS UNIT 325,900 0,}Spring, 1989 - 39 - 500K 036 PArr Ao., " DEPEZIDENT FIRE DISTRICT STATIONS AND APPARATUS r;-`"t: ,POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: _l.-Service Recipients: All County Residents X other: Fire District Residents t:2.,Service Area: Countywide • X Other: Fire Districts 3. Service Period: X Permanent Population Isle of Capri = 1,005 Ochopee = 2,789 Peak Period Population �- Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak jSTANDARD OF SERVICE: x.xxxx apparatus and fire station per capita Y 0.00097 Isle of Capri 0.00057 Ochopee ,. Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee 2.3 of present ratio of apparatus to population (1) Other Standards for Reference Standard Source Level of Service 7 or less, Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2) within 3 miles of a fire station 0.0001641 fire stn/capita Lee County current ratio (3) 0.0356 fire calls/capita Lee County current call load (4) ,". 5 minute Countywide average '-,A . response time from receipt ..,'.',of alarm to arrival = 3,251 ERU's per apparatus + 0.5 station *s* r.:,. % 1 Isle of Capri = 1 apparatus/685 population x 2/3 = 0.00097 ` Ochopee = 2 apparatus/2,351 population x 2/3 = 0.00057. (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan. p. 29. Service benchmarks for land use point rating system. (3) Ratio of Lee County 1986 unincorporated peak population to unincorporated stations. r i4) M.G. Lewis Econometrics memorandum re Lee County development project "The Parklands," 10/17/85. (5) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986. Note: 1 ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit) = 1 dwelling unit with 2.82 persons. :4 . Spring, 1989 n<: F. �r - 40 - WK _ell ISLE OF CAPRI FIRE DISTRICT LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD:.00097 APPARATUS/CAPITA K POPULATION APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARATUS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL DISTRICT REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) ICOSTI AT s K` YEAS SERVICE AREA 0.00097 IN CIP 1301,643 87-88 771 0.7 1.0 0.3 92,594 88-89 810 0.8 1.0 0.2 61,729 89-40 849 0.9 1.0 0.2 61,729 90•il-; D88 0.9 1.0 0.1 30,064 .:, 71-12 927 0.9 1 2.0 1.1 339,510 "= 92-93 966 0.9 2.0 1.1 339,510 �= 93-94 f00S 1.0 2.0 1.0 308,643 "s 94-45 ; 1005 1.0 2.0 '1:0 301;d43 xr 1S-16 1 1003 1.0 2.0 " 1 0 301�643 ;a4 r'n11h91;t <1005 1.0 ,:''2.0 1�0 301'64!_t 1005 1.0 `' 2.0 1005 1.0 2.0 1.0 3" 645 99-00 1005 1.0 2.0 1.0 301,645 .I MPULATION APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARATUS SURPLUSf2: :- .VALUE OR � .1. DISTRICT REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) ` (COST) AT TI1E PERIOD . SERVICE AREA .00097/CAPITA IN CIP 1300,645MIT +�MlESE1R •TO , �•.;-fl30/!0 849 0.8 0 1 6.2 5 TEAR BROWTH 0.2 1 1 0.8 3-YEAA MTOTAL 1045 1.0 1 2 2ND 5-YR' iRMH 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 t^ s.v.10 YEAR TOTAL 10/ t100 1003 1.0 1 2 "�1.0 f• NOTE: The unit cost includes the cost of the station, apparatus, and associated station epeipaat. - 41 - 246,116 301443 v l!-* 0 MIMS, w BOOK rw` OCHOPEE FIRE DISTRICT LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD:.00057 APPARATUS/CAPITA POPULATION APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARATUS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR . FISCAL DISTRICT REQUIRED PLAINED AVAILABLE IDEFICIENCYI (COST) AT », TEAK SERVICE AREA 0.00011 IN CIP tll,145 rr•-'." 17-1/ 2143 1.2 -r` 3 -~ywy 1.1 160,16! - H-11 2250 1.3 3 1.7 131,547 • ti �, 1!-!0 ; 2357 1.3 3 1.7 131,541 "-I1 2464 1.4 3 1.6 142,632 1142 - 2571 1.5 3 f.5 133�711i T2-13 2678 1.5 3 1.5 133;711 >" 0-44 2783 1.6 3 1.4 124,103 !4-l5 2157 1.6 3 1:4 124,803 rm• ; 2130 1.7 3 1.3 115,11! ' 16•!i1 t $002 1.7 .• 3 f.i 11'�,141 Y `' !7•!1 r 3075 1.1 3 1.2 106,t74 11-1! 3147 1.1 3 1.2 106,l74 t 3241 1. t 3 1.2 106,174 POPULATION APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARATUS SUMUS/ VALUE OR DISTRICT REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIERCYI (CMT1 AT TIME PERIOD . SERVICE AREA .00057/CAPITA IN CIP 184,14SAMIT !`MIpEAt TD; 1/30!!4 •: 2357 1.3 0 3 1.7 151,541 1{a�, 5 TEAR 6RMN 10/90-!!i"5 Y 500 0.3 0 0 (0.3) MOM -" = it; PATOTAL 2657 1.6 0 3 1.1 124,103 211 5-1'R 6RONTH 384 0.2 0 0 10.21 (17,824) `. 10 YEAR TOTAL ��' '' 10!!0-!/00 • 3241 1.1 0 3 1.2 106:174 •'�1:°,, NOTES Tle suit cost includes the cost of the station, apparatus, and associated station egaipsent. Y: - 42 - -R' DOOM(' G36 Ps'! 3•3 P Y Tv SUMMARY OF FIRE STATION AND APPARATUS INVENTORY (apparatus) (2) (3) (4) USABLE ADD BY ADD BY M-AW'AREA 'W NAME & NO. 9/30/88 9 30/89 9/30/90 North Naples 1 ,Central Naples 2 Go den Gate 3 Eas't'Naples 4 •.:goUjt)f Naples 5 arco 6 Faka-Palm ,�,.Royal Creek 7 q t t I tstates Rural 8* Urban Estates 9 .-.Corkscrew 10 6i6kalee 11 gig'Cypress 12 gountywide Total �.Spring, 1989 1� , I 2 3 - 43 (6) USABLE TOTAL 2 3 � 711 14 '14 FIRE STATION AND APPARATUS COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAG$ COSTS (2) (3) .x # COST COMPONENT COST COMPONENT COST PER COST/FACILITY r .. SECTION SECTION (2) x (3) Rrt . L le of Capri A.' Apparatus 1 q $135,000 '"8. Structure (square feet) " 1,816 35.00 63,560 J .�/ C. Design (% of building) 63,560 8% 5,085+ y D. Furniture (rooms) 1,145 E. Land (square feet) 70,000 3.25 135,000 `'AVERAGE COST PER APPARATUS + STATION 432,290 � .� OChopee; Apparatus 2 $202,790 B. Structure (square feet) 3,650 21 76,650 -Design (% of building) x 76,650 2% 1,533 4 D. Furniture ;•.; 3,464 '11-- E. Land (acres) 15) TOTAL COST 249,437 APPARATUS - 2 r(7) AVERAGE COST PER APPARATUS + STATION r. K (5)/(6) 147,219 4 .. Spring, 1989 t; 44 - i 600K PA ;E Qvf; 315 JAIL ;er.. W: A }'. POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: Y,r.l. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: X Countywide Other: 3. Service Period: Permanent Population = 186,348 X Peak Period Population = 255,964 Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,322 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 0.0033 beds per capita (1) Source of Standard: Collier County Sheriffs Office Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 0.0031 beds/capita Current Level of Collier County Service (2) 0.0010 beds/capita Lee County (3) 0.0029 beds/capita Seminole County (4) (1) Based on increase in average daily jail population through September .1992 at same rate as past 21 months (August 1985 - January 1987). (2) 565 beds.182,501 peak population 8 9/30/87. (3) Lee County CIP: 1986 -7 -- 1990-1. P. 156, (based on 1986 service f`. level) . (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards, "October 17, 1986. Spring, 1989 - 45 - boor 011 p o, .r AI F JAIL LEVEL OF SEPVICE STAKDPLRD: .0033 BEDS PER CAPITA POPULATION BEDS BEDS BEDS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL CC -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT YEAR PEAK 0.00330 11 CIP C23, oo 87-09 191M 631 641 It 241,500 88-89 202936 670 641 129) (660,1001 89-" 213776 706 210 831 141 3,346,500 Wit 223569 738 851 113 2,603,600 91-12 233365 770 .851 It i,160,700:13Z,C!;: ,'A 246143 112 831 39 9344 255964 645 131 6 144,"0 94-95 266270 879 151 (281 (637,100) 95-14. 277081 914 631 (531 (1,458,200) 96-97 287816 950 851 (911 ':(2,779,30) 97-18 298713 926 Bst (135), (31100,4011' 70-" 307332 1,022 851 ,U (1711- T21501; 1" 320478 1,051 851 (207) (41751,8001 'PER'101 BEDS BEDS BEDS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT iIME IFEAKI .00331CAPITA IN CIP .$23,000/UNIT PRESENT TO 9/34/90 213776 106 210 851 146 3,34,500 10t90.9M 52494 173 0 0 1173) (3,"3,600) 5-nm SUBTOTAL 266270 879 210 931 1281 (637,1001 :W S-YR 6WO $4208 179 0 0 (179) (4,114,700) "tot 1 TOM 320478 1,051 210 131 (207) (4,731,800) — 46- — BOOK C36 Wr 317 14 SUMMARY OF JAIL INVENTORY (Beds) PLAN AREA NAME (2 ) NO. -,-Korth Naples 1 Central -;Naples 2 'Olden Gate 3 4 uth, xA�lez 5 Marco 6 2 7E 1oyal:Faka=Palm Creek 7 ,'Rural Estates 8 rban..Estates 9 10 ,-,rkscrew 2minokalee 11 Lg;,Cyprexx 12 Countywide Total 1989 st (3) (4) (5) USABLE I ADD BY ADD BY ''',".USABLE 9/30/88 9/30189 9/30/90 TOTAL .0 469 210 :,679 172 172 641 210 851 - 47 - 100K Q36 p,�i 318' JAIL COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (2) (3) # COST COMPONENT COST PER COST COMPONENT SECTION SECTION A. Structure (modular 1 S 23,000 cell) 83-*. Equipment & Furniture per cell) C. Land (per cell) (7),"AVERAGE COST PER BED (1 Bed/Cell) i-D. Cost of Additional Beds in existing cell 0'. . „Spring, 1989 $ 375 - 48 - (4) COST/FACILITY (2) 'X' (3) $ 23,.000 NA $1:2 Tf; 0 0 O,u o,! 375 Il 600K 036 pir,,E '444a 1 t. LIBRARY BUILDINGS POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: 16'`Sarvice Recipients: X All County Residents - Other: 2. Service Area: X Countywide Other: 3. Service Period: Permanent Population = 186,348 Peak Period Population = 255,964 " X Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,322 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 0.33 square feet per capita FJ . Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee (1) Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 0.19 sq ft/capita Current Level of Collier County Service (2) �i," . 0.31 sq f t/capita Lee County CIP (3 ) 0.60 sq ft/capita Florida Library Association (4) 0.4 - 0.5 sq ft/capita wheeler-Goldhor formula (5) (1) Based on 50% increase over present level of service (2) 28,500 sq ft/148,722 population as of 9/30/86 (3) Lee County CIP: 1986-7 -- 1990-1 P. 159, (based on 1986 service level). (4) Standards and Guidelines for Florida Public Library Services May 1985, p.14. (5) Wheeler and Goldhor's Practical Administration of Public Libraries. 1981, p. 405. i S. ; R � �¢s �'$pring, 1989 - 49 - (�-�• • yet. 0 U3�FA,f��r 600K r? jet -It LIBRARY BUILDINGS LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 0.33 SQUARE FEET/CAPITA POPULATION SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL CO -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT YEAR WEISIM AVG. 0.33000 IN CIP $114.67 87-68 156143 51,527 27,400 124,1271 (2,766,666) 08-99 166162 54,834 6,600 34,000 (20,634) 12,368,177) 89-10 175299 57,149 34,000 (23,249) (2,734,730) 90-11 183554 60,573 26,575 0,575 2 232 11.12 111811 13,298 1,500 62' ' 075 (1,2231 (140,1961 12-13 201061. 66,350 3,300 63,375 (111,615) 93-14 209322 69,076 4,000 69,375 291 34,232 14-" 218006 71,943 69,375 (2,541 (294,427) "& 227122 74,950 69,375 (5,575) (639,3201 96-17 236238 77,?59 0,375 (9,5M :(98412701 17-n 245353 80,467 0,375 111,5121 (1,329,271) 98-" 254476 63,977 69,375 (14,602) (1,674,423) 9t-00 263702 67,022 61,373 417'641) (2,023,5471 SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET musl VALUE OR POMATID1 REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT PERIOD MEWED AVG.) 0 IN CIP 1114.67 - - - - - --- ---------------- ---------- -- - - - - ------- - --- - ------ - - - - - -------- - "M TO 175299 57,849 6,600 34,000 (23,649i (2,734j* 5 YEAR WN 10110-1/95 42709 14,014 35,375 35,373 21,221 2,440,304 r.S•iEAR FATOTAL 218001 71,943 41,175 69,375 (2,56B) (214,4271 20 541 6RWH 4%94 15,079 0 0 (15,0791 (1,729,1201 wle "10 YEAR TOTAL 20702 07,022 41,175 61o375 (17,6471 (21023,147) - 50 - SOOK 036 pAst 321 SUrOL RY OF LIBRARY BUILDINGS INVENTORY (Square feet) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE @ ADD BY ADD . BY USABLE ±l'y.PLAN AREA NAME & NO. 9 30 88 9 30 89 9 30 90 TOTAL a' North -Naples 1 4,000 4,,000 Centbai,Naples 2 9,800 9,800 ':.Golden Gate 3 4,000 4,000 " Ease- Naples 4 � Soutlf- Naples 5 (11100) * 6,600 ,Marco 6 5,600 5,600 Roy]f�Faki-palm Creek 7 "Rural Estates 8 f O e ':,Urban Estates 9 ;.,Corkscrew 10 `Immokalee it 4,000 4,000 B 4,Cypress 12 � _.,-:',..;,Countywide Total 27,400 6,600 34,000 R, .Not counted in totals because this library will be replaced by the ....;.; new facility in the same planning area. This is a leased facility. x z; 'Spring, 1989 - 51 - tom U36 pv,� 322 LIBRARY BUILDING COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS "'► A COST ''COST PER , COST/FACILITY w4..+rgy,�z6ST COMPONENT COMPONENT COMPONENT (2) + (3) A. Structure (sq. ft) 6,000 90.51 $ 543,060 Ngign (% of structure) 543,060 8% n43,444�;��>. z C.. Un"d ( acres) 1 - 2 donated 0 ter D.:;Parking (spaces) 40 300 120000.,;;;.; A::` . STtelving ( sections) 180 275 49, 500,„ , SFr. Equipment (items) 50 800 40,000 ,. (.�5)�TOTAL COST �:F.'; 68$�_00.4•yr. i t`'f6)',SQUARE FEET IN AVERAGE LIBRARY 61000 "? (7) AVERAGE COST PER SQUARE FOOT (5)/(6) 114.6714) t Yr ,a ~nS s a' c } r 416 `, 1 .' : Spring, 1989 ' 52 - BOOK 036 PAr,, � 323' �, LIBRARY COLLECTION NOTE: The CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee recommends excluding the library collection from the Capital Improvements Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan. POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: X Countywide Other: 3. Service Period: Permanent Population Peak Period Population X Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 186,348 255,964 = 209,322 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 1.0 books per capita Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee Standard 0.99 volumes/capita 1.23 volumes/capita 1.50 volumes/capita 1.15 volumes/capita 1.00 volumes/capita 1.00 volumes/capita 1.50 volumes/capita Other Standards for Reference Source Current Level of Collier County Service (1) Lee County CIP (2) Lee County Comp Plan (3) 1986 average of 7 systems (Brevard, Pasco, Sarasota, Seminole, Volusia, Central Fla Regional, & West Fla Regional) Seminole County (4) Florida Library Association (5) Level B for libraries serving 100,000-600,000 population Level C for libraries serving 100,000-600,000 population (1) 148,000 volumes/148,722 population 8 9/30/87 (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-7 -- 1990-1. P. 159, (based on 1986 statewide average service level). (3) Lee County (Comprehensive Plan._ p. 28. (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986. (5) Standards and Guidelines for Florida Public Library Services. May 1985. k L4/ i tiL � .Spring, 1989 s� r •�; ti - 53 - BOOK 036PA 324 LIBRARY COLLECTION P LEVEL Of SERVICE Si POPULATION Rnw: I-v ME PER CAPITA COLLECTION COLLECTION COLLECTION SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL YEAR CO -WIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT -87-8-8- WE16HHD AYS. 1.00000 -www- IN CIP $36.20 08-69 166162 166,162 6,823 167,664 - - - - - 11,321 417,060 89-" 175299 175,299 7,200 174,497 181,687 0,323 6,388 301,365 231,246 90-41 163554 103,554 5,893 197,570 4,016 145,379 92-73 201061 201,061 7,608 193,453 201,061 1,M2 59,440 9"4 209322 209,322 0,261 209,322 0 0 0 0 94-73 -94 218008 227122 219,008 227,122 207,322 (0,6861 (314,433) 236238 236,238 209,322 209,322 (17,800) 126,916) (974,339) v. 97-" _98." 245333 254476 245,355 254,476 209,322 209,322 136,033) (1,304,3951 99-00 263702 263,702 207,322 (45,1541 (54,3801 (1,634,5751 (1,968,5361 COLLECTION COLLECTION COLLECTION SURPLUS/ VALUE OR TIME PERIOD POPULATION (WEIGHTED AYS.) REQUIRED I.0/CAPITA PLANNER IN CIP AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT S36.201UNIT - ----- - ---- ------ ?WEKT TO - 1752" 175,299 14,023 101,607 6,388 231,246' 5 YEAR GROWTH I'. 42709 42,709 27,635 27,635 115,0741 M. 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 218006 212,008 41,658 209,322 (8,6861 1314,4331 511 2XI 5-YR GROWTH 45694 45,694 0 0 (45,6941 to YEAR TOTAL 263702 263,702 41,658 209,322 NOTE: The unit cost of 136.20 represents the cost to expand the library collection while periodically replacing Existing volusts due to weir, loss, etc. NC I v ! WW_ 54 160K SUMMARY OF LIBRARY COLLECTION INVENTORY (books) (2) (3) (4) (6) CLAN AREA NAME 6 NO. USABLE f 9/30/88 , ADD BY 9/30/89 ADD BY 9/30/90 USABLE TOTAL North Naples 1 18,399 931 1000 20,330 b:-Central Naples 2 88,655 2767 3000 94,422 Golden Gate 3 17,454 957 1000 19 All East_ Naples 4 South Naples 5 T. .Marco 6 ,4 Royal Faka-Palm Creek 7 Rural Estates 8 Urban Estates 9 W.jCorkscrew , 10 W h I �J f, - -'Immokalee 11 "}Big Cypress 12 - '':Countywide Total I 8,924 1154 1500 11,578 18,692 555 1000 20,247 2,711 200 200 12,829 259 Soo -130588 167,664 6,823 7,200 181,687 LIBRARY COLLECTION COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (2) (3) (4) # COST COM- COST PER COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT PONENT COMPONENT (2) + (3) A. Book $ 36.20 Spring, 1989 55 BOOK C36Art ; , 3216 I GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ,¢.POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: Lf'":... -1 -Service Recipients: X All County Residents �:. Other: Service Area: X Countywide QE_ , Other c: 3:,:Service Period: X Permanent Population = 186,348 Peak Period Population = 255,964 Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,322 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 2.58 square feet per capita Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee (based on County's master plan) Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 2.46 sq ft/capita Collier County present level of service (1) * Includes offices, courts, customer/public service areas, other county employee work space, all elected officials and the Health Department. ` Excludes temporary or leased space and facilities that are presented in ti C 6Eother parts of this study: EMS stations, fire stations, libraries, recreation facilities, water and sewer treatment plants, and the jail. (1) 325,240 sq ft/132,084 iO'Y r piing, 1989 s., - 56 BOOK Q36 PA, 32'7 z fA rt 6 -Jul -19 SOVERKKEXT WILDINGS. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 2.58 SQUARE FEET PER CAPITA POPULATION SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL CC -WIDE REQUIRED PUNNED AVAILABLE IDEFICIENCY) ICIDST) AT YEAR PUMNEXT mam IN Cip $11.00 87-B8 138950 358,491 165,017) 273,394 88-99 148050 381,961 27,354 322,748 (51,2211 (5,063 6581, 11-90 19,048 403,378 119,000 441,749 38,370 3,760,290 90-11 163845 422,7210 27,000 468,748 46,021 4,510,734 91-12 171345 442,070 469,748 26,67E 2,614,434 92-13 178846 461,413 1 468,748 7,325 717,071' 73-94 186341 480,778 468,748 (12,0301 (1,178,M) 94-73 194238 501,134 468,748 132,3661 (3,173,6211' 15-16 202515 5122,489 468,748 153,7411. 13 a 96-17 210794 543,949 468,748 (75,1011 -.17,359,1491 1IMI 219073 565,214 468,748 619) 98-f? 2273508 581,584 461,748 .-H I 547 1ell. 11.00 235738 408,204 460,741 (131,4561 : : SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SURPLUS! VALUE OR POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE IDEFICIERCT) ICOST),AT TINE PERIOD (CMIDEE PERM 2,581CAPITA IN CIP . $92.00/UMIT ............... ................ ............... . . . . ........ . . ... PRESENT TO M0190 156348 403,378 140,354 441,741 38,370 3,70,280 YEAR 6ROWTH 37070 97,756 27.000 27,000 170,7361 (6,134,108) 5-I'M SUBTOTAL 194230 501,134 175,354 468,746 132,3661 (5,173,828) 211 5-YR 610VIN MOO 107,070 0 0 1107,0701 2 I "PEAR TOTAL .,0 235738 608,204 175,354 461,748 (139,4561 I13,6b6,6881 - 57 cde . DOOK aG P4tv' SUMMARY OF GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS INVENTORY (square feet) (2) (3) (4) USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY USABLE LAN AREA NAME & NO TOT 9/30/88 9/30/89 9/30/90 AL A—iNorth Naples 1 2,247 .21,247 Naples entral 2 400000 b"000 Golaini,'Gate 3 7,000 7,000 East Naples 4 220,833 (10,646) 119,000 329,187 OUt plex 5 17,210 17,210 Marco, 6 3,710 3,710 Roya-Taka-palm A$ 'Criek 7 6,288 61288 tates 8 Urban Xztatez 9 Vo rkscre 10 Imm6kilee 11 36,106 36,106 Biq Cypress 12 Countywide Total 293,394 29,354 119,000 .441,748 *Includes offices, courts, customer/public service areas, other cbttnty employee work space, all elected officials and the Health Department. Excludes temporary or leased space and facilities that are presented in other parts of this study: EMS stations, fire stations, libraries, recreation facilities, water and sewer treatment plants, and the jail. 1989 — 58 — bOOK 0 pin[229 W Doc -Ref: APP-A.CIE p. GOVERNMENT BUILDING COST COMPONENTS AND AVKRAGZ COSTS (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) N COST COST PER COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT COMPONENT COMPONENT 2 X 3 A. Structure (sq. ft) $ 68.00 * (1 B. Furniture (open office 20.00 * (2) system) .. C. Desigr. (% of structure and furniture) 70 10% 7.00 D. Land,(provided by Real 3.50 . ,+ Property) ' E. Parking (1 per 250 sq. 0.004 1125 4.50 ft. of structure) r-rxAVERAGE COST PER SQUARE FOOT t 98.00(3)(4)(6) *(1) Includes minimal landscaping, carpet tile and window covering. Does not include energy management systems, phones, or computers. *(2) Furniture costs are based on open office furniture systems, in accordance with County policy, excludes interior demountable partitions. (3) Includes meeting or exceeding fire code, and meeting or exceeding all handicapped codes (handicap "friendly"). (Does not include sprinklers.) (4) This is a square footage cost estimate and is subject to the type of occupant programmed into the structure. (Standard office space). (5) These figures are based on the following: A. Recently completed construction projects at the Govern- ment Complex. B. Estimations on projects currently being designed by multiple architectural firms on contract with the Board. C. Reviewed by prominent Naples Architectural firms. D. Reviewed by the largest architectural firm in the State of Florida. E. Compared to major projects completed nationally. F. Are compatible with government construction in other counties in close proximity to Collier County by our Growth Management Consultant. (6) This figure does not include interior demountable partitions estimated at $150/per l.f. Spring, 1989 - 59 - i 500K 03(i PA 4 33o DRAINAGE POPVLATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: 1#� Set-Aca Recipiantst X, All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: x Countywide Other: 3. Service Period: X Permanent Population =.186,348 Peak Period Population = 255,964 Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,322 STANDARD OF SERVICE: A. Future "private" developments - Applicable South Florida Water Management District requirements (present requirements are a 25 -year, 3-day storm event except where exempted by Chapter 40E-4.053, F.A.C.) B. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service to be identified (by design storm return frequency event) pursuant to the completion of the proposed Water Management Master Plan. Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 0.0025 miles/capita Current Collier County miles/capita (1) 0.0006 miles/capita Lee County CIP (2) (1) 311 miles/123,893 population as of October 1, 1986. (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-7 -- 1990-1. p. 231 (based on 1986 'ijUrban unincorporated service level). 1b L.1 - f,7 r , . ,%Spring, 1989 - 60 - 036 pl,,! 331 ;,411*L, (6) CALCULATION OF DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS ;� 1989-90 - 1993-94 1._`210 standard has boon identified for drainage canals and structures that "... indicate(s) the capacity per unit of demand..." as required by State regulations. Drainage flows are traditionally measured by hydrologists in terms of "design storms" (i.e., 25-year or 100-year storms). Collier County lacks the drainage basin master plan studies that indicate what facilities are required for a particular design storm. In lieu of such studies, the Citizen's Advisory Committee to the Collier County Planning Commission has worked with staff from County Water Management to identify priority studies and projects for improving water management. These projects are listed below (in lieu of the usual "Calculation of Requirements"). k PROJECT COST Master Plan Study, Basin Planning and Design, Permitting $(1,040,000) oV`,;-Disl�trict No. 6 (8,552,000) yam. 4.'.:..: - Coco-iatchee River Canal (3, 248,000) ,,`;:Gordon River Extension (2,592,000) '"Other Projects (7 197 `000 Lana acquisition and Environmental Costs (4,000;000), 0v :°Countywide Total (26,629000) {;;Spring, 1989 61 - l BOOK 6PAGE 332 SUMMARY OF DRAINAGE INVENTORY (miles) 0, (2) (3) CANAL STRUCTURES 4:7 7 (miles) (number) TYPE OF 9/30/89 9/30/89 PriigAry 228 51 iM�ecoridary 83 11 ountyw Countywide Total 311 6 2 DRAINAGE CANAL COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) PRIMARY SECONDARY PRIMARY SECONDARY CANAL CANAL STRUCTURE STRUCTURE COST COMPONENT COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS A..Design S 27,000 $ 10,800 $ 21,600 $ 8,600 B.,Land 27,000 10,800 21,600 8,600 r. C.Jacility 270,000 108,000 216,000 86,400 ,AVERAGE COST PER MILE 324,000 129,600 259,200 103,600 "Spring, 1989 - 62 - 104K 036.PAf1t 3*33, PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents 2. Service Area: other: X Countywide Other: Service Period: STANDARD OF SERVICE: Source of standard: (1) TYPE OF FACILITY Persons. Boats X. Permanent Population = 186,348 -' 29,562 Peak Period Population = 255,964 Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 209,322 1.2882 acres of community park land/1000 population 2.9412 acres of regional park land/1000 population $122.00 of recreation facilities inventory value per capita* CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee (2) (3) (4) (5) REQUIRED FOR STANDARD 9/30/94 PER 1000 POPULATION VALUE TOTAL PERSONS (186,348) PER UNIT VALUE Amphitheater ' Baseball fields Basketball/volleyball Bicycle trails: miles ,,Children' playgrounds ;Community Centers 56 Community pool .f.fX tness station trails ;,°l �.Football/Soccer fields : ,• 'Gymnasiums . Jogging trails: miles ;Olyymmppic pool ;.picnic pavilions I Racquetball courts Shuffleboard courts Softball fields Tennis courts Track,and field Boat ramps TOTAL 0.0118 2.2 100,000 220,000 0.0353 6.6 420,000 2,772,000 0.1765 32.9 17,500 575,750 0.0553 10.3 42,240 435,072 0.1059 19.7 22,550 444,235 0.0353 6.6 610,000 4,026,000 0.0059 1.1 600,000 660,000 0.0353 6.6 50,000 330,000 0.0353 6.6 225,500 1,488,300 0.0059 1.1 910,000 1,001,000 0.0353 6.6 26,400 . 174,240 0.0059 1.1 1,564,000, 1,720,400 0.0706 13.2 28,000 369,600 0.1412 26.3 20,000 526,000 0.0706 13.2 10,500 138,600 0.0706 13.2 192,500 2,541,000 0.0706 13.2 18,750 247,500 0.0059 1.1 191,520 210,672 0.1646 30.7 180,262 5,534.043 *,,,..Value per capita (Value/186,348 population) Spring, 1989 - 63 - BOOK 036 Pa �E 334 23,414,412 $ 125.65 '! L-] noc.ReffiWAXIE FACILITIES PER 1,000 PERSONS STAZIMARDS COUNTY FRPA* OTHER TYPE OF FACILITY STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD Amphitheater 0.0118 -0.04 Baseball fields 0.0353 0.17 0.17 (2) 0. 2 (4) Basketball/volleyball 0.1765 0. 2 0. 4 (2) courts 0. 2 (4)- Bicycle trails: miles 0.0553 1 Children's playgrounds 0.1059 1 (5) Community centers 0.0353 0.067 (6) Community park: ac 1.2882 2 (2) Community pool 0.0059 r. f Fitness station trails 0.0353 0. 1 0.13 (5) _Football fields 0.0353 0.25 0.25 (2) 0.05 (4) Gymnasiums 0.0059 Jogging trails: miles 0.0353 0. 5 Olympic pool 0.0059 0.04 0.04 (2) 0.05 (4) Picnic Pavilions 0.0706 0. 5 (5) Racquetball courts 0.1412 0. 1 0. 1 (2) 0.05 -,:,!,Regional park: acres 2.9412 20 20 (2) 5 (3) 0,,(` Shuffleboard courts 0.0706 0.2 0 '2 "(2) 0 c Soccer fields 0.0353 0.25 0.25 (2) 0. 1 er' Softball fields 0.0706 0. 3 ' 0.17 (2) 'Te'nnis courts 0.0706 0. 5 oi� 2 0"'51 _,.('2F .: 2505 0' 2 (7) Track Field 0.0059 0: (4) Boat ramps -freshwater 0.0529 25 3. 3 (8) Boat ramps -saltwater 0.1118 25 3. 3 (8) FRPA = Florida Recreation and Parks Association Standards are per 1,000 registered boats (2) Collier County comprehensive Plan quoting outdoor Recreation in Florida, 1981 as a guideline. (3) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91 (based on Co. Comp Plan). (4) National Recreation and Parks Association (5) Kansas City, Missouri (6) Jackson, Tennessee (7) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," 10/17/86 (8) Florida Department of Natural Resources: 1 lane/300 boats. Spring, 1989 - 64 - 100K 036FA! 33.5 iq,: yY '� ►AAR AA RICRUT10RiA►111ITREA1E73 , ' WN J ' REVEL V SERVICE STA1@ARIr .111//1000 Pr /OMAT1011 A1t11IT►K._;.TEAS ArnITKATE13 A;"ITNEATDS SURPLUS! RERVIRE1 CII TOTAL SURILOSr •rim. CO-911E REOOIA£I ►LAIR.! MFICIDM i VILUE AT Kum A17111RriE t1EFiCIE11t11 YEAR rERAAlw 1.04001is It CIr AVAILAM 100,100 VALUE MUE 17-12 131150 1.6 1.0 10.11 1N,000 001 ,001 (N,0001 IgOA 1.7 1.0 (0.7) 110,100 1 100,100 (11,0001 151341 1.1 1 2.0 0.2 110,100 1/0,000 200,o01 20,000 �> 90-f1 I[;/;. 1.1 2.1 1.1 1"'04 1 200 001 10 000 11-t2 1113;5 2 2.1 C.0 200,o01 1 204,000 0 0.111i. 17-r 171146 2.1 2.0 (o.11 211'"1 1 2"'0" p0,0001 pq A„ 13•14 {usll 7.2 2.0 11.21 220,1/1 1 201,001 (21,000) 11.13 111241 2.3 2.0 11.31 230,00/ 1 201 m " (30 000) ti-11 20231S 2.4 2.0 11.11 241,000 1 204.001 ((0,1001 1:?S,Lf:f thr 21071; 2.3 2.1 10.31 250,101 1 200,o01 t:1,0001 17-n 211075 2.1 2.1 11.11 260,101 1 204,100 (64,0"1 ,rip. ,):i; 71-11 22.:.1 2.7 2.1 (0.7) 270,001 1 214,014 (70 0001 t4t4�asy ri oo 133rd 2.1 2.0 (0.11 210,001 1 20,e04 . IIO,o00) IOIULATIal 1I071AI1 tit TOTAL SUPLUS7 Co-1110E / vA:ot AT PLUM AVAILAIIE IWICIERCT) 119 ►EA1110 rEAIAKV 1100,000/I191T VALUE VALUE trul" I5t,341 110.000 Io0,A00 2".0" 20,000 fI//% - tits 37.m S(-,000 1 1 of,000) F s i YEAR SUSTIlk 194,231 ix'm 1"'"o 200,001 (30,000) A1lki`+f' b11 S•tR dOfTR (I,SOI St,101 0 0 (31,0001 r't 10 TECH MAL r.I 'a15,000 IDo, 001 200."l 110.0001 N: .r r, 'y. 'YS71_ - 65 - } 1 BOOK OW Wit' Q. r ) I PA213 All RECKATION:11AMALL FIELIS LIM OF lEAViCE STAMM PW "MATICK WaALL FIELD lASEJXL FIELI MEW-1. MUSI MUM Ell, TOTAL smusl FIrA co-wiff RLIVIAEJ PLAAM FIELDS (WICIMY) I VALUE AT ftme MILAM IIEFICIENCT) YEAR PEllu" I oo:u 19 tit RVAILW.t 420,00 VALUE TALK lum 4.9 3.0 q.il ."oso'coo 11-19 141031 5.2 1 1.0 11.2) 2,114,000 420,000 I'm,o01 1504,0N) 11-" IU341 11.5 1 11.0 10.11) 2'310,0" 420,0" 2,IN,000 1210,001 wfl W141. 3.1 2 7.6 1.2 2.434,0" lic'"s 2,140'0" SH's" 1)-tz 171343 6 7.0 1.1 2,510 101 0 2110,040 420,1004 11410 0 7.1 1.1 2,60,101 1 2,114.m 214,0" I3-14 Itwe LA 7.0 0.4 2,771,00 2,144,0" 1"'0" 2,lfl,000 0 2,144,0" 42,0" 7.1 7.6 19.11 ?'qu,"a I 2,144,M 142,0"1 211714 7.4 7.0 10.41 3,1N,001 0 1 w, 001 17-11 211075 7.7 1.6 10.7) 3,234,000 1 2,944,000 1214,0"1 7.4 11.01 3,3",000 1 2,941'001 1420,M) mwf J 11.31 3,qu'loo 1 2,10'101 t3o'101) POMATION LE991F.El CIP TOTAL SURKVSI CO-1 M I VALUE. At PLual AVAILME (DEFICIECY) % TIME PERID PEAPJjCFT 1420,MIUNIT VALUE. VALUE "Mit to 2,316,009 420,001 2,10,00 4210,10) 3 TEAK $1011 INT11 1193 37j" al'too 140,0" 040.0" W,00 20 5-it $AMR 41,3" 511 VA # 1 mn,000l 10 TEAS. TOTAL 211317:4 3, Nt,400 1.764.0" 2,140'"s 1348,0N) Py r - 66 - BOOK 03fu�,,t337, ^ PAII13 M ItMT101111CME TRAILS uvM 9 K"M ITANIARST .035311090 Fr. PINFUTICIff 13MU TIAILS BICTCLE HAILS PICTMt TIAIL SWUW Rmto tip IOTPL sumus/ KNIXES FLAME) ATAILAXE IKFtCID" I MR At PlAso AVAIUM (PUICIDICTI' PIDN" 4. IOW.33 11 tip 80,244 MVE WK V-" IRT50 7.7 311.9 41.2 3:3".41 2,6n,148 11-" 14101-1 1.7 0.1 St.l 41.6 341,:" 34,016 2,M,164 P." 1543411 1.6 t.1 43.5 54.1 U3,114 213,001 2'An'240 2,311,411 "I IV44: 1.1 11 71.5 64.4 422,40 3,104,641 2,720,=A 171345 13 10 13.5 74.0 401,2" 422.400 3,517,040 31125170 171146 1.1 1 113 ILA 411,116 3t0,111 3'"7'201 1,411,424 V3-94 194341 10.$ 1.1 141.1 11.1 4331172 405,504 4,31'.-,704 3,177,k32 0 94-" 11c..t 11.7 142.1 91.4 451,111 1 4,312,704 3,M4,71i 13-11 2MIS 11.2 4,317,704 3's"'m qj-Ij 216714 11.7 102.1 ".4 414,2 4,317,704 3,111,411 2199711 12.1 511,104 1 4,312,7" 3,161,000 4,1111,704 3,7110,4111 13 142.1 MI 141J21 1 4,312,704 3,743,514 tvv.tt:og Floyllis tip TOTAL SWFLISI N-1191 I:ALU( At PLAMNO AVAILAM WICIECTI • 11MI PUID9 ptx%WKI 14 ..2461URIT VALUE VALUE 11.704 I,M.4k4 1,630,464 1,541.70 1.111,472 20 5-11 vvm 4:1500 4"I3. I it na TiTA, r. 1. -,A U1.111110 MI1,472 4,312.704 ' ,7V.,314 6Fn 338 NO AQ WItATIORMAT LA171 a Ltru M SuVICE STAXIMS .164+ LAKI/1001 ION. rMATIOI IOAT VANS PAT &UPS HAT 1AR1 SS1 ISI ItOOTAEI C1P TOTAL SWLIS1 FIVA a•I►tt AEe11Au KUKI AVAILAKE cltrtttEACTI I VKV( AT KANO MIIAIU• 11EFTCIDVI a nu �. 1ER U" y •`� 1.100I146 11 CIr M~_~M_• ~ 1N,2A2 VALUE SNUB ' 07•N 1N1S1 72.1 7.6 113.11 I,i2f,001 1 I,lU,IN (I,IAA,IIII II-H 1414ne 21.4 7.0 117.41 1,:f1,71S 1 t,2A1.R4 13,13A,35f1 tl-f0 ISi341 25.7 : 10.1 IIS.J) 4,632,733 540,JIA 1,102'sa 12,130,1131 "I 1►:N: 2•' 2 12.0 (SS.01 4,167,174 :4),3I4 2,la,m (2,703,1301 �J' ; fl•tI 1:134: 21.2 2 143 114.2) S,Or,311 3►S,524 2,323,141 I2,1:1,7I0) ' • 12.15 171141 21.4 2 14.0 U3.4) 5,2",703 SAO,:24 2,104,112 II,4t5,S1U SS-1t 11A341 30.7 33 114.71 5,134,043 1 2,114,112 (2,141,1311 14.15 114231 :1 16.1 (1A.01 3,761,314 1 2,114,112 0,N4,1121 !S•11 201,513 :3.3 11.1 (IM) 6,002,723 1 2,114,112 13,111,5131 1r11 211114 :4.7 1A.f 111.J1 /,I ,111 1 2,IN,112 13,r70,11f1 71 .� n•n 21n1s 3►.1 u.1 rn.0 ►soT,+sl 1 2,n4,t12 u,►t3,xu dY 44.:;' ri•n 2775•,1 31.4 11.1 I21.0 ►,T41,11t 1 2,IN,It2 1I,t31,►n1 {L'` • ^' ': f4-f0 I=731 :1.A tA.O (22.11 A,ff4,164 I 2,104,112 14,101,1741 r01V.ATta IIIu1A11 CI1 1010L S(A4 M ' a-1101 4 VALVE AT ILu3111 AVAILAILt (KFICI=l i k = 1111 MIDI 11►1 UC TT 11N,201011 VUE VALVE F "101 Ts 1/31lfI 15+,N1 4,a ,7:3 310,7tA 1.4102,►20 12,Q1,11:1 s.. �- 5 TEAT. MIN .: • 11111 - 11ti 37,f10 I,I•,S,A51 1,N1,S12 1,N1,'ii2 I34,11f1 `�- 5 TEAR SgE10TAL 1f4.2:t 3,7/1,N4 1.122 ::1 2 ,NS,rn 92,11+,1m }„ 20 5-ft 0 XIS 41,500 1,.:.,11/ 1 1 11,I25,7t21 rt= - ;,>: 11 TIM IOTAL 2 :,730 4,114,166 132:11-11 2,114,1" 14,101,1741 40 �SR�y Y I *III i 68 A 6 [i l• 6�, BOOK C361'ArIl tars 0; U:UATj0%tCWMtTY CEPITEIS UVEL F SESTICE SILWA03 .4314311"0 ?W- FWILAIICI (97-311111% (MMIMS "MITI MVII 11191991 list% cl-vitt RNIREI PILUT.) MXIEAI WICIM) I MK It nAA nArA" COMM 11 tip ATAILAILE 610,000 117-01 131 M 4.1 2.1 92.91 2,111,000 U-M 14M4 5.2 2.0 13.21 3,172.00 11-110 1:4341 14.5 2 4.1 11.51 10145 S.1 I 6.0 1.2 :,531.m 11.12 17134S 1 6.1 0.0 3,110-000 9219-11 1711t1 A.3 4.9 IM) 3,141,000 1;-94 11048 6A 1 7.6 0.4 4,071,04 14." 1142,11 6.9 7.9 0.1 4,709,004 1$-96 MIMS 7.1 7.0 WD 4,331,000 116711 7.4 7.0 10.41 4,514,00 21117 5 7.7 7.1 10.71 4,117,00 247*11 1 7.3 11.01 4,110,000 Wo 2:Ua 1.3 1.1 11.31 5,413'0oo CA-11H I MIA it nw.) AVAIMU (VEFICIENCY) PEARM111 1110.100/VNIT VKQE YOLK Ar ru z T4 MAI" IU.:41 rLm $0," r,4.06 s na micur. 114,no 4.20il0" 3,M,004 4,274,"0 61,00 24 I -TA SMIN 4.50 n,(.#(* 0 0 11•.4,0091 N TEAL TDIAL M. "0 I.M.000 4.270.0" Im,001 E 44. - 69 - eooK Un36',`,1,',340- CIP TOM mot LOW AYAfLA1LI twitimn FILK VICK 11,749'"01 .4,271,004 1427,0041 4,271,00 1110's00I I 4t270,0011 rm,om hus Ati R=11003COMITT PARK AM - LE1TL OF SERVICE f1A10AA1t 1.211211000 ►01. ID'V.At101 COM it ACRES COM K Ml COM t[ ACUS iORIIOS/ AE011IAE1 Cll TOTAL ilAnasr 11 VA CO-f]K AE0011E1 1LAR1K1 AVAILASU 11EiICIERCTI 0 COST A3 nun AVAMAM WINE= '• t ' TLAi 1ClLA1T1T 0.0012112 11 p! 11,011 ta? MAlgi �.1t74.=e;, i7-!t 13!!`A 111 11l.0 !.0 4,2fi3OtO 0 4,3(2,000 21i,000 WIT 1420A 1f0., 111.1 I2.11 4,376,140 0 4,512,00 (64,100) Y,c �.- I1-10 151747 203.4 11l.0 (1..41 4,133,i(0 0 4,312,0(A (.21,4001 113:. 211.1 .2 220.1 1.9 3,0ii,410 761,000 3,210,0(A 21.,i00 ti42 171343 220.7 220.1 10.7) 3,21i,It0 1 3,210,04A (11,1001 171146 2A.4 32 232.0 21.6 $21 110 :,, 761,00 f,041,Ko 311 400 l3.14 114341 240.1 �2.1 11.9 37i24N 0 f041001 213:i00 .., 14-13 1144-11 1-50.2 M.1 1.1 6,004,110 0 6,041,000 43,11" t.. 1•r16 202313 24.0.9 M2.0 (1.1) i,2il,it0 0 1,041,000 (213,A001 1i-17 210714 271.3 232.0 111.31 6,314,010 0 6,041,000 (41,000) 17-11 211073 212.2 232.0 930.21 6,772,1t0 1 6,041,000 9724,1001 ' tt-11 m351 212.! 232.0 140.11 7,021,iM 1 6,041,001 (111,400I "-410 2337:4 301.7 232.1 (31.1) 7,211,Its / 6,04i'm (1,240,1001 t ►01111ATIOA COM K Kn$ CON. K RnS COM K K111 MUSr CO-1IIE AE091RF1 ILMIK) ATAILASU IKFICIEDCTI ti 111E ?U..10: ►EAPA E11 0.0012112 11 Cl/ �. NMI To MOMS M.341 201 0 111 (131 j. G s nu wmm ,. long • 103 i7,110 49 64 04 13 S TEAR suiTO7AL m.na ISO 44 232 2 a• JJ `. `. , 2ATi 3•TR 6WR 41.501 54 0 0 f341 10 TEAR Tom 1.3,;.1 304 N 232 (32) k' a+. 70 -- 600K �3 PA�,�4 1 f4:6 I I� 9 12-A0r-" HC'.. r� e'•r* .'1 PAW A" REWATIOWR I ITT rW ubEL OF SERIICE STAOUh .Mill#" F0/ } ro/UUT1a COx ►OOLS cm.r001S COMM Status! RMIRE) CIr 701AL St[,rlus/ FIVJL CO -gilts REIVIRES FLAPKI MOO (IEFICIEIICTI 01Q11E RT ttAWJ ATA1LAOU (IEFIVEAl:T) TEAR r'txwdlfT 0.0" 051 IR Cl/ AVAIIAILE SWIM TXK VXUE INN I M`A 0.1 4.0 10.11 410,000 1 I 1410,000) U-n 141050 0.1 0.0 to.?) 540,001 4 1 (344,1"1 It-IP 15041 0.1 1.1 10.1) 540,000 4 1 134011001 1e-11 10145 1 1.1 (1.01 100,000 1 1 ri00,m) 11-T2 111:45 1 9.1 0.0 i00,000 I 1 lioo,0o01 12-43 171146 1.1 I 1.1 it. 1) ii0,m 601,00/ 1o0,400 (64,11M) 13-14 11041 1.1 1.1 10.1) ii0,00/ 1 100,000 164,10M) 14-15 114231 1.1 1.1 N.11 110,o01 1 100,00/ Ii0,mi 5-1 1A 20"d5 1.2 1.1 10.23 720,0N 1 wit" 1111,1011 14-17 210114 1.2 1.1 11.21 noo" I 1"'m 112/,1111 17-11 219on 1.5 1.0 10.3) 7"'m 1 10/,m 1110'em 1t-11 227351 1.3 LI 11.3) ?"'0" 1 600,o00 r110,1001 , 11-00 227:1 1.4 1.0 10.41 140,000 I i00,001 (20,0N) r MATIOI UNIREI Cl/ TOTAL ft>Rrtuv Co-111E 11'AIUE AT rLAAIEi AWLAU (KFICIIRC71 7111 ►EA10 rEAAACUT 1400,o0019911 VALUE WOE Mno To 1130r11 :S1,341 sto,000 e 1 r�o,000) 5 TEAR PSTI 16f10 - fits :7,110 120,000 400,000 601,100 4"'0" 5 TEAR SIATOU1 1!4,:-A 149,00 4"'m i01,N0 Ii0,0011 11 YEAR TOM ::5.1:6 140,000 101,000 no, MO 120,1011 - 71 - 1OOK .36 P;C,f 342 PAW Ass TRAM LEVEL OF SEMCE STAAWk:.f3SIIII0 /OF. POWIJQK F17161 TUILS FITKU TEATU FITIGS TRAIL SM&W IEVVIIEI 63' .. TOTAL swam FIM M-41H LEZ;IRJ PLAMIGI CEVERS WIMEIM I VALUE AT FUND mnmu (DEFICTEXT) TEEM FEFRW.91 1.0004:1.4 Is tip AVAILULE 50, no VALUE VALUE 17-u 131154 4.9 0.1 14.11 245110 4 IHM 141cw S.2 IM IJ (3.2) 2N.Oa 1 1 (20,001 11-99 15041 #J F3.51 273.090 0 0 (2r.'11m • "-it 14.141 1 2 2.0 04.11) ?"A" 10,0" loo,ow Itto'em) 11-12 1713;5 6 2 4.0 12.01 30,00 100,06 200.090 (100,001 fy'", 14: 12-13 171144 6.3 2 1.0 (0.11 :15,00 l"'m 3"'Re (13,9"1 r-14 1"1 &.4 7 1.0 3.4 334,00 79,0" 94-" 114-.A 6.9 1.0 1.1 u."m 4011.006 35,101 214114 7.1 1.4 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.1 =,ON 371,0" O.. 400'101 31, M 97-92 21147S 7.7 0.3 3a's" 4"'o" LIM6 1 1.0 0.4 406,006 1 4a,/')1 2.5731 1.3 9.0 11.3) 415'm 1 400'r* 113,0001 pamunox EMIKE) tip TOTAL SWAM M-TIK I VALUE AT t1mril MILAILE (SUICIECT) IM (0.1011 n vjj W- fulvArmil VALUE VALVE MMW T; MOM M13411 vz'wo a I an,m) C, s nu. m,,v lot" - 111$ 37,110 70'01 400,0011 400,M rA'O" S TEAR SMICAL 114,Zi 345,W 406'1s 40'm 53'1a it TM WAL 2:0XII 41..M 4"'"o 400,0" 113'"o) - 72 - 900( QqkPA'E 3, 5 'A t ►AKS AXS tMEAT10RtiirlRtSIURS LEM OF SEIVICZ STA1(OAROs .W4111M ►OF. /O►OLATI01 iYOUIUMS 6YWSlud STIOIASIIAS SURPLUS/ REPORT! CI► TOTAL RVUS1 FISCA CO-RIF UIVIRES PLUM AVAIL.RILE (IEFICtENCT) 1 VALUE AT ► am AVAILAlLE MUICIEX TI TEAR /ERr+.K;1T 0.00M59 IN C1r 110,000 VALUE TxUE it -III 131TS0 0.1 1.0 10.11 721,000 4 1 1772,6001 96-11 1110•A /.1 1.0 10.11 ut,000 0 0 (111,0001 WIS 15+311 0.t 1 1.0 0.1 U1,/oo tT/,000 710,000 II'm n-1t 11343 1 1.1 1.0 111,101 0 910'"1 0 11-12 MKS 1 1.0 0.1 VI/,00/ 0 111,101 1 n-13 17II44 1.1 1.0 (o.1, - 1'"1'"0 1 11/,000 (11,0001 13-11 Iswo 1.1 1.0 10.11 1,00t,000 1 110,001 mt,0001 n-n 11tz31 1.1 1.1 10.11 1'"1'"0 1 111,001 111,0"1 "i 21w1S 1.2 1.0 10.2) I,m,Ooo 0 110,0" 11112,6") 11-1T 210714 1.2 t.1 1/.21 1,112,001 0 111,001 11121o011 n-1s 21107S 1.3 1.1 10.31 1,ta,000 0 110,001 1273,1301 11-11 221no 1.$ 1.0 10.31 t,fa,000 1 111,000 12n,0011 9" M731 1.4 1.0 10.41 1,274,001 1 1I0,000 1311,0001 ►MT101I RERVIAE1 CIr TOTAL sm"I CO -MITE 1 VALUE AT ►uma AVAILAILE (IEFICIENM TIME MI00 ►EM41W -1111,000IIA(IT VALUE - TILDE ►HWT Is 9/3Uf0 ►U,311 111.000 110,001 /11,000 91,000 S TE1M OWN 101" - 1/1S 37.110 Ir,o" 0 1 1312,0001 % nm MTvAL 1 .ns 1,001,000 111,$" 111.$" 111,0ool 2111 S-TE 6WX 41,S00 r,1.0o0 1 1 (273,00o) 10 TEAR TOTAL 22.731 1,:74,00/ 110,001 110,100 IIA4,/0/) - 73 - EOOK 038PAFEm4, VA :. fuz . { FISCAL TEAR •- n-u Wit FARLS Af0 AECREA1101410436 TRAILS 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE STAADAU: .055311000 POP. PWVLA11o1 Joi11Ri TRAIL J0661118 TAAII MINI TIIM tx11F W REWIND CIr ' TOTAL SII PLOSI C1-/IDE (RILES) AEI FLA111E1 RUES (WlclERCTI f VALUE At rLAND AVAILAIU IMICIECTI IEAaAW COMM IN CIF AVAILAILE » 21,400 TILDE TALK 1311so 4.1 1.3 141M 3 1 1 S (:.41 13 1) 121,:Ao 031 'So 1 s1,A00 (fl,1101 Is-t0 11i34S 5.5 1.5 14.0 ,. I1s,.00 1 s1,Aoo 31,00 a1,iDo1 1103,D00) A" 10-t1 Ii:14S 5.1 1.S N.:1 lS:,:20 1 3t,A4q II13,S201 11-t2 171345 1 1 2.5 13.5) 151,400 U,400 1i,101 (12,4001 6 12-l: 11114 6.3 1 :.S I2.11 1i1,:20 lA,400 t2,400 (13,1201 13-44 114341 6.6 I 4.5 1.1.11 174,741 2A,401 111,/00 (!3,4401 t4-t3 I142:1 6.1 4.3 (2.4) 112,160 1 111,10/ 16:,3A01 7.1 4.3 (2.11 111,440 1 111,100 {i1,640) 14-57 210714 7.4 4.3 12.71 1is, 3A0 0 11/,101 ql,:W) W4s1�� 11.11 211015 1.7 4.5 (3.21 207 21/ 1 II1,101 fly"1 11•fl 22TIS1 1 1,3 q.Sl lit,201 1 111,1g1 I11,1001 11-0/ 23WIS 1.3 43 0.11 219,120 1 111,10/ 1100,7201 FCMATIC[ 0F071F.3 CO-111DE f YALIA AT - T11:E FERTH FEAMEAT M,00/111I1 .• � � FIESM TO �` 1fii/t6 TSi,s<I N3,200 r' r' S TEAR PWR let" - tits 37,110 :4,111 S TEAR PAIDIAL 114,2:1 112,110 y 213 5-n Owl 414a SA,%4 11 TEAL TDTA: 2:s,-,A 2:9,120 r;r1 ry.• _ 1. CV TOTAL SIRr(.OS1 (LA1111ED AVAILAP.E 1DE11CIEICTI YALUE ».. TILOE ..»_ 1 31,000 (105,1001 71,200 11,200 $2.240 71,200 111,10/ IJ:,a01 0 1 M,Ywl 11,201 111,101 11/0.320) 74 - tou My-E .345 UVIEL W 10VICI PANIARli .443111M PW. MATION OLYNIC MIS OLYSPIC roml Kyulc ms unlit IMMIS UP TOTAL Fxnw FISM CS-11H ALOUIR11 KOM MILQU 111FICIECY) I VKK A- Rua AVAILAnt IWICIDCT) nAt Kv." Cooml it tip VXK VXPE lul" 141MA W 41 e,t 0.0 10I1) 1,407,0" 1 1 11,401,4001 MIAS 11,564,001 IO314,000 loullf" 9243 17041 1.1 1.4 11, t1 1,720,4" a 1,114,101 1131,4"1 4 lewt i.l 1.0 11.9 I,rA,Ioo 1 1,544,06 1136,400 MrA Lf 1.1 (4.11 1,120,100 1 1,w,o0l 117A,400) 202sts 1.2 1.1 10.21 1'171,100 1112,9001 216711 1. 1.0 1:12,1001 rVO 2110015 1.; 1.6 1,544,M 1461,2"1 IMI 221M 1.3 1.6 2'1'.3,20 l,u4,001 loy"I "-01 213rA 1.4 1.1 10.41 1123,401 cit 101K kwurs/ WITH I VALF. AT rjjKl MILAM !DEFICIENT) TIRE PIR111 ptojmll . .. . .. . . 11,544.09mll ............. . ..... ME . . .. VALUE KnrKT To YlAA 6mwll lot" • fM 371M 31:11" 1,114,101 1,w,1o1 1,131,3/I 12f, 10 I'SiA,w 29f '-rl IWF so 0 1449,20f1 I$ rLa TOTAL 2: 1.. r4 2.111.60 1.u4,00o 1,U4.0" t123160ol — 75 — tou UNW1146 rt -I-,,I FARES AO RMICATtONsPICSIC PAVILIONS LIM OF SERVICE Stmv.Il .070411001 P0. MMAIJOK PICNIC ?AV PICNIC PAT PICNIC PAV MUSI REQUI Mll CIP TOTAL SUWLOSI FISM cl-fill "WRES PLANNED AVAILRU WICID" I "LlE AT nme ATATLAILI (nFICI= TM nk&wxl 0. "011 104 it tip X'HQ mot "At w 17-H JIMA 1.1 1.0 11.11 274,4" 1 v'o" (246,400) 1.9 11.51 214'001 1 n'"Q 11 1.0 MM 301'000 4 :1,0" an'sov wit 1011111 11.6 1.0 116.61 :24'm 0 21'000 121i'lool 1142 171345 12.1 1.9 ItI.tl 3a'I" 0 :1,0" (314 no) 1.1 ul,a MM I 101 1l1311 13.2 It IWO) 111-013 1142:4 1317 12.0 11.11 :its,m 6 334,0" ("'M0) Il-li 2;21.15 1413 12.0 112.31 94014041 0 ni'm 164,400) 11-17 210711 1419 17.0 Q. f) 617.2" 4 31i'00o 111,2901 17-91 211073 151.1 12.0 13.51 44,001 0 334'00o (%to0) 12.9 14.11 450'1" a :U,I" 1114's") 235731 16.6 12.0 14.11 A14j" 0 :36,001 1121,100s MPMATION UQUIP0 CIP TOTAL musl C11-11H I VAUE At PI.A.110 ATAILAILE IIMEFICIENCT) ME MID PERIIAMENT 1211,00019111 VALVE VALUE I VIAF 6ANT11 Wit ?-.,m M."s 30'"1 23.114" 5 IlAp 1441111N. 194'2a M'M 3r4l100 147,6"1 !I -I'll 10ONIm 41.*t 1i,A_911 1 0 11112001 It TEA TOM :217:1 464,000 301,000 rAl"ll 11211111001 - 76 - BOOK 10136 pi t. 111.7, (AW APO UMATIM:IK7t1 MU HITS LEVEL OF mct STAXWh .1412110" /0►. �t.,'`F•t' ►WILITION 0 CIAAITf Al CONITS U MATS S0 LVL' I[mta CI► TOTAL mull itSf71L CO-11SE IEtOIIEt tlA11icl AVAJWLE (SUIC1EIIC" t WALK AT Wale MULE t0EF1CIDf:TI nu IETAt 0.001412 Ul Cr IO 01 ►111t VALUE L ,'' .� •- - WN 13M 11.1 12.0 17.11 312,001 / 240,000 Im"o001 �''. lo-t1 I41050 20.1 12.1 f1.11 41i,000 1 240,001 Il1l,0001 `. f _ n-11 I54341 :2.1 12.0 110.11 447.000 1 241,100 1202,0001 11:145 :Z l 12.1 (11.1) 412,000 1 241,000 1 :2,0001 11-12 17045 24.2 10 22.0 (12) 414,000 200,100 440,001 (44,000) r243 . I71141 25.5 22.1 13.1), SOA 000 + 1 i40 14/ , - f1l OOOI + 13-14. 111341 26.3 72.0 11.31 521,000 1 14e,001 111,/001 14-15 I1422 27.4 22.1 ISM 541,000 1 440,001 Ila,0oo1 Mr11 21 :IS 21.1 :2.0 IM) 372,o00 1 440,/10 1132,0001 210714 7111 22.1 (7.1) su'm 1 440,0" 1151,0001 '�� % r+'. !7-q 21117s 30.1 Za.l 11.1► I11,000 1 440,000 11)1,0001 221351 32.1 22./ (16.1) 14I,00/ 1 440,000 1202,0001 22.0 (11.1) 1"'m 1 440,001 I221,o00) ►OPWATI01 IEVOIAEO Clr TOTAL SWItLOS/ CO-111E I VALUE AT ►LAARD AYMAM (KFICIEICTI THEE /EAIOS ►EATAIEIT 120,MIIXIT VALUE WALK �� A• PRMT To Inv" IU,341 442,00/ 1 240,000 (202,000) �•r ; (- r S TEAA it011Tt lot" • 1m 37,1" 101,000 2","0 200,00/ 14'"t S 111E MOTOTA: 11c,2u $41,00 2001111 441,101 Ila,eool 210 s-Tt SUM 41,500 S1t,000 1 0 gii,000l f 11 TEAI TOTAL I :,1it 111,006 2".MO 440,000 fi1,0001 f fv - 77 G 1 11 I SOCK nn ��ii v-,,E ,)'i ��A � f FARES ARt ASCATA)104iAE AUK PARK ACRES ?' LEM of SERYICI STA"Uh 1,441:11000 101. F 10P91ATION lit PARK A_RES AES N-M A:RES US FARE A!M SMIS/ REOCIKES CI► TQ1Al - SORFLOS/ fi r;.� ' •:.._ - - riii.11 C0411£ AENME1 Itkpa AYAI WLE (IEFICIERCT) - 0 COST AT 1lA)I8 .'•ATAILAKE '' 11EFICIM-TI na FE1tlMENT /.00:1412 Is OF 10,000 COST TAtOE I1•N I1130 tot.J 25:.4 115l.11 4,Mt,000 1 1,53/,000 11,35J,0001 fE-t1 14146 4:..4 «1.4 (112.41 4,:54,600 1 2,531,10/ 11.124,Og1 n-N W41 451.1 2;2.1 (204.1) 49211,N/ 1 2,S30,1o1 (2,011,0001 :i�' 17;,.• M•u Ilan 411.1 704 153.1 471.1 4,111,000 1,"o,Oa 1,334,001 4,111,Oa %^ 11.12 111345 Sot 153.1 44f.1 , 5,040,000 1 I,331,a1 ' yto,1o0 ►:.' ! 12.13 111144 521 153.1 427.0 5,2►o,000 1 1,510,001 1,2fl,000 rM4 IU341 V1.1 ML0 404.1 3,411,001 0 1,530,000 ' 4,041,00/ 44-13 1142:1 51i.3 153.1 31L1 5,113,00/ 1 9,534,000 3,117,000 U-96 20:s15 5l5.1 1A.1 3S1.1 3,ru,100 1 1,53/,001 3,574,001 210114 121 ISM :31.1 /,200,001 / 1,5:0,00/ 3,330,Oc/ IT-" 11144 144.3 ISM 301.7 1,443,001 1 1,l30,eN 3,IIT,ea 11-11 W.51 111.1 M.0 214.2 f,HJ,101 1 1,SSO,Oa ' 2,143,101 i^ 11-00 235J31 113.4 153.1 ir1.6 6.134,000 1 1,531,001 2.51f,001 .,z )V0LAJ104 1.£f /AM, A:A£S RES PAPJ: AM Ul FLU AM S0Mt0S1 e . CO-111E RETJ1AEi PLAN(£/ AYA'LULE (WICK) TIM[ FERID PERIIAKNT 4.002T412 IR Cil FILICAT it A. i //31r14 MINI 411 1 2;/ 1267) k' a: ' S nAI IXUIRR }�T:'a to/n • 1riS 31,110 111 100 in TEAR 3OITOTA• 111,u[ 2)1 101 i2. 22 f` > 2"'_TR 1n". 41.500 1:2 0 0 1122J To TEAR toTA: 235.1:1 t43 7D0 12: i►/ y Y ✓t . r. M #$ - 78 1�Y -. .If1, ' " BOOK 03f F � , It'solo r-"] ?AN3 AG RMT101:SWIFUIMS CUTS LM OF SERVICE STARDOM .07041100 POP. RMATION CMIS MATS COURTS SUMOSI Anglin tit TOTAL mts/ Flr.X CI-111E noulka ?LAAK1 AVAILALE (KFICIENM I VALVE AT m AWJ A"ILA" (KFICIDM.) YEAR nVAIM COMM is elf $10,507 WALK VALIK 11.0 1.2 112.107 0 113,50 12 400 141050 113 itJ 0.5 110,253 1 113's" 3,250 It -it 1%;41 it I1.0 0.0 Its'so) 1 113.50 1 %-vt U3845 11.6 11.0 10.61 lZ1,100 1 lls'm 11,;001 9142 17134s 12.1 11.0 (1.0 12-7,05) 1 113,50 111,m) r,-I; 17114 12.1 2 13.1 0.4 132,300 21,000 lu'50 4,204 U-94 I14341 13.2 13.1 10.21 131,602 1 lu's" 12,1001 114131 13.7 0. 1 143'154 1 lu's" 17'ZO1 241315 11.3 11.0 11.31 150,156 1 lu'5" Injul firvi 216714 14.9 11.0 211075 111.3 13.0 22733 16.1 11.0 111,4:0 71s131 11.6 174,300 I Iu,500 137,1001 wt "PULAUCK ItIVIA9 elf TOTAL most CHIH I VALVE. AT KAWEI RVAILACE (IEFICIENM TME Fill" MAMW SIM40tWIT VALVE VALE PIDW, TI MGM 156,341 1:5,w 1 115.5" 3 TEAR WONTI lot" - qRs 17'1" 2t'35/ 2I,000 21'101 (?,rA) 5 T111A fRIGIAL 194, rA W, M I1,000 lu's" 17,201 in 3-TA Wm 41W 34450 to TEAL TOTAL no .73 174,30 6*1.000 12.50 137.2141 - 79 - SGDKW.7.350 6 Pit, FAKI A" IECAEATIOl:F00TIALL/SOCCER FIELDS " 4 i LEVEL IF SEATICE STAMM: .0=1000 ►Or. rOroLAT101 F/S FIELDS ►!s F1ELIs Fri IIAVLIS/ A11YlOf1 Cl/ TOTAL SURPLUS/ n1:fJ:: FISCAL q-IIIE REQUIRED RAAtTI FIADt 10EfICIElo:T1 1 VALUE AT FLAIM ATAILAALE IOuICIEIKI'1 r nm P Al UWI C m"23 II CIr mILAW 25,500 VALUE VALUE V-01 lurA {.1 4.1 11.11 1,101,1•A 1 102,000 1202,0501 11-11 l{00So S.2 1./ I1.21 1,172,100 1 102,/1/ I271,001 # 11-90 11.11 lum :.: I :.0 11.:1 1,11e,rw 222,:01 1,171,501 1112,ro1 U343 s.1 1 1.1 0.2 I,I1r,100 221,3" 1,3s3,oa 43,10/ ?S 71 11-V2 171:45 1 1 7.0 1.1 I,: '"s 22s,s01 IsnsN 2n'sw 12-n 17110 1.: 7.0 0.7 1,420,AS0 1 I,ST1,301 1S7,IS0 ;; _' '` tf-11 111341 1.4 7.1 1.1 1,1p,300 1 I,S71,300 f0,200 ,�.� ~ i{-fi I14T� {.1 7.1 L1 I,SSS,15e 1 1 S71 Sal L' •A 15-11 202513 7.1 7.0 I0.11 1,01,eso I l,Sn,S01 122,:A1 '•ITffj.1 11-17 211714 7.1 7.0 10.41 1,111,700 1 1,m,30 110,2001 "Ar,_:; 17-11 211175 7.7 7.0 11.71 1,73i,1,'i0 1 1,3n,s01 It9,IS01 ll-fi 22r.51 1 7.1 11.e1 l,ta{,oa a I,m,s/o t22s,SDoi 11-01 =7:1 1.3 7.1 ILS1 1,111,150 1 1,571,501 1213,1501 t * POPULATION Af0011a CIt TOTAL stmosl CD-IIOE t VALVE AT PLANNED ATAIIADLE 11EFICIEl1:T1 TER IEA101 r[AMNi1fi 1223,5anull VOLE M E � cl�l 1lie/11 151.141 1,240.:50 ,500 1,121,50/ I1l:,7A1 S YEAR sA0M 11190 - tns i,,l» 31s,1a IS1,000 I;l,001 IIS,.roO 3 S TEAR SIA1T➢TAL lu,T:1 1.S:S,1•A i76,500 1,371,5o1 22,5.0 20 S-T, OWN II,Soo loo 0 1 al.-joal 11 fm TOTA, =,rA I,Il1.130 171,%o I,m,sa T21:,IS11 7 r: 8o aoo "36FA�351 r.-tw-n PAW AND AMEATIMSOFTIAII FIELDS .` LEVEL IF SERVICE ITAa AN: .670411000 FW. ►MATI01 SOFT1AU FIEII SOFTIAU FIELD S07Tixi SIA usi REDUTAED CI1 TOTAL StMt1l05/ f='• FISCAL CI-B1IE U291F1-0 PLANNED FIELDS IDEFICIEACYI 1 VALUE AT rime AVAILABLE (DEFICIERCTI • '. YEAR tE7tRA11ErT I.Io00Jot 11 UP ATAILAP-E tn,So0 ME VALUE i,.0 13" 1.1 13.1 3.2 1,111,500 0 1,502,500 LIi,o00 11.0 2.5 1 2,502,50 411,:50 . i1-f0 Isu41 (( 13.0 2.0 2,117,50 1 2,:02,:00 315,000 1.4 2,233,000 1 2,502,501 u1,500 11-r. 171345 12.1 13.0 0.1 2,,-n,r4 4 2'"2'"1 173,=O z r, •.`,,,,, ti-13 171141 12.1 13.0 1.4 2,427,90 1 2,502,S01 77,000 13-14 I SL341 13.2 13.0 10.2) 2,541,000 1 2,502,501 - (31,S00) 114M 11.7 11.0 10.7) 2,IA,-.A 1 2,502,501 1134,7:01 T'rtl 20=13 14.3 13.0 11.31 2,72, 756 0 2,502,501 9250,2501 " 11-i7 211714 14.9 13.0 11.1) 2,141,250 0 2,582,501 (U3,7501 ll-10 211o73 15.5 13.1 (2.5) 2,1t3,7•A 1 2,502,501 t4lt,r4l 22TM 11.1 13.0 (3.11 3,Itt,2S1 1 2,Ul,uo : (31t,nm 235131 I1.1 13.1 13.61 3,lnsa 1 2,542,501, tin,1141 /KY.Ailyn Rzn&r.:y "r IWIN6 W"6uz/ R 010E 1 Mr. AT I"W-) AVAILABLE (KFICIEWs) TIIP Min ►E1I:, l 111:,:0011AIt VANE VALIE ►F.E$AT it Imlo I:6,346 2,1[T,we 0 2,:02,910-,n,o00 S TEAK 9=1 III% - lF1S 31,itc 5lt,1:0 : TEAR SIFITITAL 114,nt 23:11,:A 24 S-TI IADUTB 41,Wc .!I..A It YEAR TOTAL 1::,rA 1 1 9311,7•Al 1 2,502,:00 11:4,7:01 1 1 (3:t,2'AI 1 2,502,501 1/1i,0001 - 81 - 600K 036 PASS 35Z- - Ar wr`` 12-A1rd1 `alr FWS AO UCAEATIDN:TEUIS CUTS LEM IF SERVICE STANOAFr11 .07/N1000 FW. ►OMAIIOM TEX91S CIS TEAIUS CIS 1Eu111S MILCSI AEOOISE) Cl/ TVAL : SORFLOi/ FISCAL ' CIFYI1E OM AEPlAAAe tLAILE/ CUTSIo£FICIECT) i VALUE AT ►L xto MILQU 4SEFICIEKY) TEAM T 1.0000701 IA Cit AVAILAI:E 11,n) VALUE VALUE � • - n-a 131T5/ +.e 24.0 ._ 14.2 w. ii3,754 1 450,eoo 21A,w0 1440•A 10.5 2(,1 13.5 111,173 0 450'"o 233,T: P-11 151:41 11 24.0 114.0 201,29 1 450,000 243,750 I"M ILA 24.0 12.4 217,S40 1 4 '"o ='500 s'•- 11-U 171345 I'm 24.0 11.1 22A,VS / 45/,000 223,121 12-13 171144 12.4 24.0 11.4 23i'no 1 450,000 213,750 13-14 IU341 13.2 24.0 10.1 747,500 1 450,000 202,500 14-1s 1442U 13.7 24.0 10.3 21,073 1 450,10/ 113,123 rr1A 202515 14.3 24.1 1.7 2a.123 1 4s4,000 111,173 1/-17 210114 14.1 24.0 1.1 271,373 1 430,00/ 1T/,12s 15.5 24.0 1.5 2n,1is 1 4S0,o1/ Is1,3Ts ` w`, 11-1f 22TIA 11.1 24.1 7.1 301,113 0 45/,10/ ' 141,12s 11-00 2237It 1A.1 21.0 7.4 311,2•A 1 450,000 in 751 ' t /9rAAT10K a -WIFE AEQUIR'sl 4 VALVE AT CIt ILAM) TOTAL ATAILAr-E san is/ NUICIEICT) i Tin num Puma; 111,75 fUKIT VALUE VALUE G 15A,341 bi.:f0 0 450,006 24:,750 5 YEA. 6101 37,111 5.,125 0 1 150,Au) s TEA& 2470TAL 114.rA :Si.i : 1 450,100 1"'125 r c 20 :-1'L PJM 4:,56/ 54,: , I 1 I54,3151 I/ TEA. TOTAL 2:1..rA ::,w0 1 45! 101 131 7w < .�, V 4~ :r Y. r s{ y, a • r. Y.o: .:.. s - 82 - 4�F ,•y4 rwy . Boo K - Qo� 1- PA r'E Jij �r�'r,ii! 10•kf-11 FAAu AMS AECAEAI1014tTIT lots r�f11 LEVEL W SEAYI:E ITAAI mh .1059/1000 W. ! ' "'' • • `�' t0/411ATlOK 101 LCTS 707 LOTS TOT LOTS S4IAILUSt 1f0UMED CIt TOTAL IUM99/ FI1J. C"IOE AEOUiF£D 1LRAX1 AVAILAILE (0EFICIEXCT) S "VA Ai MADIE1 ATAILADLE (1EfIC1E1ULTl TNA nRT;" 0.00010Sf IO CII a 'no VALUE VALUE ;Ys ;;ii?�• ' i7•1e 131f31 14.7 13.0 11.7) :31,415 1 2f1,1'o I31,333) I"? 1410•.0 13J 11.1 12.7) :54,0z 1 2f3,130 IW,IOh P-10 (si:47 14.6 1:.0 13.0 374,:30 1 213,30 (ll,iro) 19-it 14143 11.4 13.0 14.4) Sr,370 1 21-"m (ff,=) y= f1-12 1713AS 11.1 I:.O 15.11 • 401,153 1 2%1% 1115,m) ;. 12-f3 171141 11.9 s 11.$ TOM 421,115 112,71A 403,90/ (2 'Ml R?v - 11-14 1K341 11.7 11.0 11.71 444,23s 1 403,901 131,=) 14•111 11419 20.6 11.0 12.0 414,M 1 403,101 CI,A30) . 11-11 2015 21.4 I1.0 (3.4) 412,S70 0 403,V01 (71,4701 , 1" 210714 22.3 11.0 14.31 $02,143 1 405,f00 tu'li ) 17-11 211073 23.2 11.0 0.21 s23,164 1 403,900 1117,2111 9-11 2273U 24.1 16.4 I6.11 543,4:3 0 403,fo1 TIP,= ff-oe �s1:1 23 11.0 17.11 SR,rA 1 403,"o c1S7,131) FWVLAiIas RICculta CIt TOTAL SUMUJLUS/ CO-U1OE A VALVE AT 1LAMIES AVAILAi_E (oJICIEXCT) Tirt FERICS tE><tl.M4T 4:2 •54MI VALUE VALE. fluito 131,141 :74,',',1 a 2fS,lsO 111,1ro1 9 �: 10/f1 - f/fS ST,fi► fUi,201 112.TA 112,731 1'2,S'A t. ` r S 1E4 13TOTAL 1f4,rii1 444,3:1 112.730 103,f00 (s1,A30) ,~ M S-» idyl 41,304 fi,-:1 1 1 111,2201 'vv 10 TEa TOTAL -",I:& K:,750 W.15O 40s.101 1137,1N) At: 83 ,; :. GOOK 03*6PAfE354 '=' ►W3 At/ ItCAE1110101ACt A" FIN ":� • ' . �•_ Ura of itATiCt 11140AAM - .0011110 Fa, �� + ` /OPIA.AT1011 F. T=IFIEU TAA:NFIEU TAACC AQ WLVSr AEDO 90 CIP 111AL IWLIl/ t1i:AL CO-IIIE KRIM Ptwo FIEU WFICIER:T1 a VALUE AT PWOIE/ AIAILAILE IOEFICIEmcn TEAM ?MAW /.0mo;1 11 W AVAIU'UFLE 111,520 VALUE TAX ,? 11-H 131131 /.1 0.4 11.11 {53,21/ 1 1 11r3,2141 sE-tt I114Si Lt 0.1 10.11 11:,a1 1 1 I1n,:Ni tF-re W41 01 0./ 10.11 172"al e 1 it72,:1t1 10113 1 1 Lf 1.1 11./1 1I.11 1T1,521 i11,5l/ 1 1 1 1 1111,5101 1111,5201 11.12 �. 12-q I'13tS lmll 1.1 1.6 I1.11 IIO,In 1 1 1211,1121 13-14 IU341 L 1 I 1.1 10.0 210,1n 111,sn iti,521 13/,IS21 11-t3 1112;1 1.1 t.e 10.11 210,it2 1 Itt,S2e (11,1571 15 11 20251S 1.2 1.0 1/.2) 2",121 a 111,521 131,3041 r: 11-17 210714 t.2 1./ 10.11 rn,121 1 I1t,S2o 131,3011 17-11 211f1s 1.3 1.1 10.31 241,116 0 111,520 137,4U) ihlt " '>•• 227;31 i.S 1.1 t/.S1 241,171 1 11t,S21 "- I37,1511 (71,1011 " -' t1-91 ISS131 1.1 1.1 0.41 211,121 1 111,521 • ', ►Ik7_AT10A IECOII,EI cif MAL SUAtLPil C0-r11E 0 VALISE Al rLANCI MILAt.E 10EFICIEKD) .; r ;1 • � T11Ii MIN PWA CIT 1I1I,s20/0tii VALUE VALVE Eli •.s :/AEls-R1 n Ituf" Is/,3<I 172,Ul 1 0 IIr:,Siil ' Mf r • s nm mull ,3 i`�'ti Jlrtl • /rt5 3T,n1 ;1,M1 11t,S21 t1t,m 1S3,2I/ S TEAR INT1111L 114,22 211,172 I11,S20 it1,SM t11,1i21 ft } 2115 5-12 9t,71R! 11,500 51,151 I 1 I:7,S•dl :. to TEAL TOGAL 2:S,rA 21t,12f 11I,s20 1111•»e (74,6011 — 84 — BOOK lS�t) PAFI[ 3.55 • '4 Y run all uW10411filall"Imilm COATS, LEVEL W mytel Mawl .045110" • PIP POPULATION: IN CIATI Iry CUT$ 1/1 coots Sulnull umia cir tot AL sumps/ FMA C"M &MME) raiwi (SUICICAM I VALUE AT KA130 AVIMAJLE (SUICIE)Cn TIM nVAIW 0.000171s 11 CIP AWARALS 17,50 MVE TALK, it, i•n 13MA 243 I:./11131 421,134 0 U1,30 1211,.-Al I Will 141451 21.1 IM 11M) 456,750 1 227's" mq'rw :7.6 Ml 114.61 4n,409 6 227,50 cms'swl :1.1 11S.11 sn'7u 1 227.500 1211,2501 171143 U. 1* Ill.?) S2I,sa 1 277,50 1:41,0w) 12-ro 17110 111.6 11 21.0 Mil u-3,C00 211,101 :47,50 143,3041 sly,w . lia'm It A $4.1 21.0 11.31 m7A ' W'30 IT2,7sol vvil 2m. Is 3. 1 :1.0 11.7) ily-A 1117'2s0) "7 216714 21.1 11.2) '51,00 1 507,501 110,544) 17-1S 21"n N.? .11.0 11.11 '77,Ml 0 U7,5" 1119,7-41 I" InIze 44.1 21.1 111.11 701,751 1 347's" liti'm mot, ti '1" 215131 41.6 21.1 112.61 721,006 4 307,50 I220'sool nwim uovan tip 1111L 61IrL9w I MA At PLA00" AVAILAM flultimy) f114 Mfg! PDMKFT W11411131 VALUE VALUE vt 10, s rLm MICTIL *1 347'5" 1 r., rA) m -it fsOV71 AI'm :214156 1127,M) jV16A MAL 7:4 m.00 no'00 im".001 - 85 - BOOK 036 P" A" r,*E PARKS AND RECREATION: LOSS • 1122.00 INVENTORY VALUE/CAPITA " ACTUAL VALUE PLANNED IN THE CIP 13 FACILITY 1917-11 I911-11 19 MO 1190.11 1191-12 1992.13 1913-94 TYPE INVENTORY INVENTORY INMTORY INVENTOPY INVENTORY ' INVENTORY INVENTORY VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE i POPULATiONICO-WIDE PERMI 138,150 148,050 116,349 163,843 171,343 178,864 w�186,341 r AMPITHEATEPS $100,000 $100,000 1200,000 1200,000 1200,000 1200,000 • 1200,000 BASEBALL FIELDS 1,260,000 1,660,000 2,100,000 2,940,000 2,140,000 2,940,000 2,940,000 BASY.ETSALL/VOLLEYBALL 227,NO 227,500 227,500 227,500 277,500 507,500 307,500 BICYCLE TRAILS 2,361,216 2,399,232 2,682,240 3,104,640 3,527,040 3,907,200 4,312,704 CHILDRENS PLAY6AMS 293,150 293,150 293,110 293,IN 293,150 405,900 405'"0 COIDIIAIITY CENTERS 1,270,000 1,220,000 2,440,000 3,660,000 3,660,000 3,660,000 4,270,000 COMMINIITY POOLS 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 600,000 FITNESS TRAILS 0 0 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 FOOTBAWSOCCER FIELDS 902,000 902,000 1,127,500 1,353,000 1,570,500 1,579,300 1,578,500 6YNNASIU 0 0 910,000 910,000 110,D00 110,000 910,000 ' J081IN1 TRAILS 39 ,b00 31,600 39,600 39,600 16,000 42,400 118,100 OLYNPIC POOLS 0 0 0 0 1,564,000 1,564,000 1,544,000 PICNIC PAVILIONS 28,000 29,000 20,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 336,000 RACQIF_TBALL COURTS 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 440,000 440,000 440,000 �.. SHI]•rFLEBOARD COURTS 115,`AO 115,500 115,500 115,500 115,500 136,500 136,500 " SOFTBALL FIELDS 2,502,500 2,302,500 2,502,500 2,502,500 2,502,500 2,502,500 2,502,500 ` TENNIS COURTS 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 TRACK b FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 191,520 BOAT RAr1PS 1,261,634 1,261,B34 1,802,620 2,163,144 2,523,669 2,884,192 2,804,192 TOTAL 111,001,500 S11,451,316 $15,151,110 $18,327,034 121,225,858 S23,106,02 $24,741,116 VY� PER CAPITA VALUE $79 $77 $97 $112 $124 $129 $133 a'ry. - 86 - B0011 036PASE 357 ' ►ARKS AND P,ECHATIOki LOSS a 1122.00 INVENTORY VALUE/CAPITA ACTUAL VALUE REQUIRED IN THE CIP WED ON INDIVIDUAL FACILITY STANDARDS FACILITY 1187.11 1f11.11 Illt-l0 1990.11 1111.12 1112.11 11f3•f4 TYPE INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE POPULATIONICO-VIDE PERM) 138,950 149,050 136,343 163,843. 171,345 -''118,14b 126,349 AMPITHEATERS $160,000 $170,000 S180,000 1190,000 4200,000 : $210,400 1220,000 BASEBALL FIELDS 2,058,000 2,164,000 2,310,000 2,436,000 2,520,000 2,646,000 2,772,000 9ASK£TPALL/VOLLEYBALL 420,750 456,750 483,000 503,750 521,500 553,000 575,750 BICYCLE TRAILS 325,243 346,368 363,264 384,384 401,220 .418,176 435,072 CRILDRENS PLAYGROUNDS 331,485 354,035 374,330 312,370• 408,155.."::.42b,I15 444,235 CONIAAIITY CENTERS 2,969,000 3,172,000 3,355,000 . 3,538,000 : _ S,660,000 13,013,000 4,026,000 COMITY POOLS 480,000 540,000 540,000 600,000 600,000, : - 660,000 660,000 FITNESS TRAILS 243,000 260,000 273,000 290,000 300,000 . 313,000 330,000 FDOT/ALL/SOCCER FIELDS 1,104,950 1,t72,600 1,240,250 1,307,900 1,353j000 :- 1,420,650 1,468,300 8Y10IASIORS. 728,000 819,000 819,000 910,000 910,000 :'.1,001,000 1,001,000 J0881N8 TRAILS 121,360 137,280 145,200 .153,121 , :: 151,400 r 166,320 174,240 OLYMPIC POOLS 1;251,200 1,407,b00 1,407,600 1,564,000 1,564,000 : 1,720,400 1,720,400 PICNIC PAVILIONS 274,400 294,000 309,000 324,900 339,800 352,800 369,600 RACQUETBALL COURTS 392,000 411,000 442,000 462,000 • 484,000 .506,000 $26,000 SHUFFLEBOARD COURTS 102,900 110,250 115,500 121,600 127,050 ..:_' 132,300 131,600 SOFTIALL FIELDS 1,866,500 2,021,250 2,117,500 2,233,000 2,321,250,.: 4,423,5O4 21541,000 TENNIS COURTS 183,750 113,875 206,250 217,500 :•226,673 :'•- 236,250 247,500 TRACK 6 FIELD 153,216 172,361 172,368 111,520 191,520 210,672 210,672 10AT RAMPS 41128,000 4,398,393 4,632,733 4,167,074 5,083,381 5,219,703 5,534,041 TOTAL 1`17,351,759 111,621,769 f19,486,995 120,189,211 121,384,211 $22,342,966 1I3,414,412 PER CAPITA VALUE wi.4 1, 1125 1126 - 87 - C-6 c� e0oK 036 PA;E 3�8 $125 1126 1125 1126 1124 x� Arr Doc.Ref: APP-A.CIE SUMMARY OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES INVENTORY (number of facilities, unless otherwise indicated) COLLIER #iat+'FI COUNTY OTHER fiST7_�1; -TYPE OF FACILITY 9 30 89 GOVERNME2;T PRIVATE w..---•-- •-Amphitheater 1 1 o8aseball. fields 4 5 1.5 E. ;-,'Basketball/volleyball cts 21 44 3 ?.Bicycle trails: miles 56.8 25.3 10 ;,;.7k ::Children's playgrounds 15 24 9 Ct t�Commu.nity=centers 2 3 30 e.Community �park: ac. 188 Vcommunity pool 0,,' 4Fitriess :station trails m,la N Football/Soccer fields ll.G:z ''Gymnasiums %M00 «.Togging• trails: miles Iqi `tOn�1': volympict ipaol k,,01 tr�Picnic4pavilions [3,W, i •; Racquetball courts li'lar "'Regional park: acres %Shuffleboard courts OJE1 , ';Softball -fields U Tetulis•- courts "'Track &'field Boat ramps f • ^y�t1 s; Spring, 1989 5' 1 2.6 i. 16 253 23 14 32 7 - 88 - 2 9 10 1 2 8 6,842 13 28 51 8 16 "16' .11 79 1.5 188 34 TOTAL 2 10.5 68 92.1 48 35 188 57 18 14 11 4.2 16 35 6,842 115 43.5 271, 8t; 57' no, )DO. m Spring, 1989 - 89 - tOOK U36 WE 360 Doc. Ref .- ;k"". CIE M M M Doc -Ref: APP-A.CIE 3. REVENUE FORECASTS There are 24 sources of revenue that Collier County will use to pay for its capital improvements for public facilities. Twenty- two of the revenue sources are "restricted" in that they can be used only for specific types of public facilities. The twenty- third and twenty-fourth sources of revenue, Ad Valorem Taxes (Capital Revenue Fund) and 7th Cent Sales Tax can be used for any type of public facility. The revenue sources are presented in the same sequence as the facility requirement calculations in order to relate the "restricted" revenues to the appropriate costs. In the forecasts listed below, each source of revenue is listed with the amount that is estimated to be received by the County from October 1, 1989 through September 30, 1994. As a general rule, revenue forecasts are based on recent actual collections, statistical trend analysis and a 6% growth factor to conform to the projected population increase that appears in the requirements analysis (see Chapter 2). There is no inflation factor in the revenue forecasts, just as there was no cost inflator in the requirements analysis. ROAD REVENUES 1. Constitutional Gas Tax 2. County Gas Tax 3. Local Option Gas Tax 4. Road Impact Fees 5. Developer Contribution 6. Gas Tax Revenue Bonds 7. FDOT Road Funds WATER AND SEWER REVENUES 8. System Development Fees 9. Grants 10. Uncommitted Carry Forward 11. Revenue Bonds - New Issue SOLID WASTE REVENUES 12. Landfill User Fees LIBRARY REVENUES 13. State Aid to Libraries 14. Trust Fund and Donations 15. Library Impact Fees Spring, 1989 - 90 - BOOR 036PA,E9'61 $ 2,178,000 6,206,000 18,415,000 20,854,000 1,000,000 9,000,000 4,865,000 22,200,000 4,900,000 1,823,000 39,788,000 10,185,000 400,000 179,000 5,498,000 F771 Doc.Ref: F= CIE GOVERNMENT BUILDING REVENUES 16. State Grant for Health Building 250,000 17. State Funds for Agriculture Building 135,000 18. Uncommitted Carry Forward 3,131,000 DRAINAGE REVENUES 19. Stormwater Utility Fee Bonds 26,629,000 PARKS AND RECREATION REVENUES 20. Florida Boating Improvement Program 843,000 21. Parks Impact Fees 12,501,000 22. General Obligation Bond - Regional 7,000,000 Park Land UNRESTRICTED 23. REVENUE Ad Valorem Taxes: Capital Improvement 13,739,000 Element (45% of 1.000 mill) 24._ 7th Cent Sales Tax (portion allocated 64,198,000 to Capital Improvement Element) TOTAL $275,917,000 Spring, 1989 0 — 91 — BOOK 036 PA ,E 362 L� Doc -Ref: APP-A.CIE t•: I. ssY y 1•Yr 4t� f I- Ynq .i t f Phi Spring. 1989 E„ 4. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS - 92 - BOOK 03116PA,-t! 363 Doc.Ref: APP-A.CIE 4. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS One of the most important requirements of the capital improvement element of the comprehensive plan is that it must be financially feasible. In accordance with Chapter 9J-5.016, F.A.C., the County must be able to afford the standards of service that it adopts. The preliminary test of the financial feasibility of the County's standards of service is presented below. It compares the estimated cost of required public facilities (from Chapter 2) to the revenue forecasts from Chapter 3. The relative priority of need among facility types is based on two variables. First of all those facilities which are linked to the issuance of development orders (e.g. roads, water, sewer, drainage, solid waste and parks) as a group will have a higher priority than other facility types (Category B) in order to assure that concurrency requirements are met. The second variable is the type of revenue used to support each facility type. There are revenue restrictions among the above mentioned six facility types which prevent the County from using surplus funds from one facility type to fund another facility type. Water, sewer and solid waste facilities are each financed through enterprise funds. This means that like a private business, the costs of providing goods and services are financed primarily by user fees. Any surplus revenues cannot be utilized to finance other types of facilities. Road projects are funded with gas tax and impact fee revenues. Again, these revenues are levied/charged for a special purpose and cannot be used to fund revenue deficits relating to other facility types. Drainage projects are also funded with special revenue funds levied fer a special/specific purpose. One of the six facility types, Parks, is the only type funded primarily with general revenues which are not levied for a specific purpose. Because of the restrictiveness of revenues by facility type prioritization of need among them will not help in eliminating deficiencies caused by a lack of revenue or capacity since surplus revenues for one facility type cannot be used to fund deficiencies in other facility types. Appendix B of the Capital Improvement Element includes a Capital Improvement Schedule of Projects (Table 2). Within each facility type all projects are identified as either providing required capacity for existing deficiencies (as of 09-30-89) for future growth or both. Within each facility type the schedule of projects prioritizes projects in order to first eliminate existing deficiencies. Spring, 1989 - 93 - i� BOOK L C P,tA64 Doc.Ref:"RA.CIE In the following table of costs and revenues each restricted revenue source is first compared to the cost of the facilities to which the revenue is restricted. If the revenue is greater than the cost, the "surplus" of revenue is available for other needs in the same restricted area (such as repair, remodeling, and renovat- ion, or expansion of capacity for growth after the five-year horizon of the plan). If, however, the restricted revenue is less than the cost, the "deficit" for that type of public facility will be added to the deficits from other types of public facilities in order to determine the county -wide deficit of costs after credit- ing all restricted revenues. The county -wide deficit is then compared to unrestricted revenue, and a final surplus or deficit is calculated. If the bottom line is a surplus (or zero), the plan is financially feasible; if the bottom line is a deficit, the plan is not financially feasible and will need to be adjusted by (1) reducing the standards of service, (2) increasing revenues, (3) reducing the cost and quality of facilities, or (4) any combination of the first three. In the -able below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5. COUNTY ARTERIAL rx COLLECTOR ROADS LZSS Available Revenues: Constitutional Gas Tax $ County Gas Tax Local Option Gas Tax Road Impact Fees �;, - Gas Tax Revenue Bonds STATE ROADS NrrWORK 1_ LESS Available Revenues: Y:; 1:.; - ; F'DOT 5-year Work Plan a; 7_e :,Developer Contributions in Spring, 1989 2,178,000 6,206,000 18,415,000 20,854,000 9,000,000 Deficit $ 4,865,000 �110001000, Deficit - 94 - 600K 036 $ 73,503,000 $(16j450,000) i 43,577,000 -1 ,5s,865, 000 $07,712,000) 7777 Doc.Ref: Aar -„.CIE DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS -,-26i629400 LESS Stormwater Utility Fee Bonds .26 629,1000 Balance 0 - - 1 1 LsA o 1. n6nXi 0.1h.12 w�NliT ;,SEWER SYSTEMS $ 68,711,000 LESS Available Revenues: -System Development Fees Grants Uncommitted Carry Forward Revenue Bonds New Issues $ 22,200,000 4P900,000vr)Vrra1(3 1914 1,823,000, ir ""v.'l 39,788,000 $,.§6,711,000 Balance $ - 0 - :?_;YAT 14,2310.4AV ()A SOLID WASTE $)40,185,000 LESS Solid Waste User Fees 10,185,000 Balance $ 1 0 X, PARKS & RECREATION $.,27,672iOOO o0o LESS Available Revenues: V A Fees Park Impact. - I I : , _° , I, $,12, 501, 0.09 Boating improvement Program 843,000 13,344,000' ' Deficit $(14,328,000) :-, 1:'11el.cl JAIL LIBRARY Buildings Collection Reserve for Future Projects Total Library Costs LESS Available Revenues: Library Impact Fee State Aid for Libraries Trust Fund Spring, 1989 0 Deficit Deficit $ 5,498,000 • 400,000 179,000 Net - 95 - t " f I 100K $ ( 978,000) $( 9,636,000) $ 4,266,000 1,323,000 488 000 C077"Oot 6,077400 $ - 0 - Q84?L I AR Doc.Ref: APP-A.CIE ��00 0OVEMN&M sulunnas 1194f, 000 Available Revenues: State Grant for Health Bldg. IV. State Funds for Agriculture $ 250,000 135,000 , Building Uncommitted Carry Forward 3,131,000 30516.000 0 00) 7; TV S -rM DISTRICTS Isle of Capri 0 -,.Ochopee 0 Balance 0 • AD VALOREM TAXES: Capital Revenue Fund $ 13,739,000 (20% of 1.0000 mill) t Subtotal Deficit of Restricted Revenue vs. Costs $(71,198t000) 00%';'Pro' sed' Revenues Po' 't $ `64 308! 000 A. 7th Cent Sales Tax (Allocated to CIE)' ' -1 -1:000:0 B.-. Obligation- Bond for Regional Piik"'I w General 0 Balance' r I)l I Lid 00j;L,[ 00. 14A' 91A.18 1989 96 - 10DK 036PA6. r-367* Doc -Ref: APP-A.CIE Ib�i �� '?r%.:'..'. 'r ,•gip"a ire ;^r!_q 5. COLLIER COUK'I'3C POPULATION PPWECT 0Kt Ft ' S p. d9�Cjrii: 1S7L'C1iw r ~ 7,6 .yy,- '1+`• GYi 1 M .. i �v a 11 a Dom/ IAr.: j 7' ;9b 4t~ 3i• At tiYy:.r V 4: ;. SPring. 1989 X .97 6001E yU�c Doc -Ref: APP-A.CIE PERMANENT POPULA=cn Plan Area Name - No North Naples 1 Central Naples 2 ,-S, -,Golden Gate 3 " East Naples 4 South Naples 5 y: Marco 6 Royal Faka-Palm 7 :k Creek • * Rural Estates 8 s-' Urban Estates 9 ..Corkscrew 10 Immokalee 11 ~ Big Cypress 12 City of Naples 13 .'; Everglades City 14 County Total (Permanent) Peak Seasonal Totals ,144 - ; ��. Weighted Aver Wei g age Totals October 1, 1989 September 30. 1994 21,441 27,882 14,443 17,967 17,545 24,813 19,285 24,214 11,748 14,621 10,509 13,571' 5• 6,349 8,720 4 4,847 3,938 3,615 14,029 335 19,412 544 148,050 202,936 166,162 7,352 5,719 4,485 15,675 t y 346 r, r4. 20,40 r. 583 186,348 255,964 209,322 a. Based on 8 months permanent population and 4 months peak seasonal. Source: Collier County Planning Department, March 20, 1989. ,,'Spring, 1989 �1t - 98 - fi c r 8L't , cutl�z�B `''•i'J� 1 $7•' y N� f, it e ivt �. , i r spring, 1989 i d0 iW* 6 Doc.Ref: 6. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMUNITIES SOCK Q36 PArpc Vo Pik sou 03GPA,,t371 APPMMZX CAPITAL IMP 'OVE14M" PROJECTS -- 1989/90-'-1993/94 9 :41 Spring, 1989 Y-4 Table 1 t� Doi".: APP-B.CIE a APPENDIX 8 LIST OF TABLES i Title Collier County Capital ImprovementsCosta;'' Collier County Capital Improvement Schedule of Projects `3 Net Operating Cost Impact F i 1 1 Spring, 1989 r^� i BOOK UMPAGE3'73, ,s t Doc -Ref Appi-q.,t:IE Table I COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMpROVMqEM Fy 89/90 - 93/94 TYPE OF FACILITY ROADS 'DRAINAGE JAIL i�BUILDIkS) 4k LIBRARY,(COLLECTION) GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PARKS ."WATER' SEWER SOLID WASTE L4. L& Spring, 1989 ti (costs in thousands) PROJECTS COSTS $117,080 26,620 970 4' 1 $ 9,636 71 C-i C', Aff cm $ 1,323 $ 8,949 $ 27,672 i - r 930 ,$'39;76i 4 TOTAL $215,917 4, 800K M6,pAq 374,,.... C." C� m r- A 0 0 oo In -F to LA rt- o 03 " oo �4 = 1`4 M VI- (n H V4 40 f- r- rIj C) C% r, tn -w "r 00 er ko N W) ko %0 Ln CNI -W C4 in rs! -W r4 Ln N ®r. cm L'I j qy, 17 co Ln to co cm A !,'I Ln 0 f Ln C% C% a% V-4 C4 co ri C1 1, -010 . . � I AT. K.4k %0 0 0 0 o N%a Ln Lm C4 4C4 H co Ln co to a% Ln co IPI IT4 Ln C% .. 1. f4 In 0 0 co tp to r- to a H C4 0% tn Ntn N co N NP4 NA, CQ m (i tj tj co in "I P4 rd -W CO 7- A C) r: Ln co o in 44 C, V Go U Ln In co 111 0— r4 4w-.T-. V 4J Id H a v-4 T m 44 044 41 �q co m w V) C 14 0 " -,4 0 -4 L4 M C4 M tO 11 H 14 r-4 k a W k 14 1 4 0, to a w 0 Ln a Ln 41 -1 At en v k 0 #d -4 0 of La :A> "ud > 41 41 0 0 wig so M 0 0 -4 fl (3 1 OJ 0 U 44 IW 44 WU %W 0 10 cd 41 1 -4 -4 4j 9 M M 0 1 1 1 1 to 0 1 V w w 1:1,-4 0 0 0 fd o > " I m rd C) in 94 rq x f< = a 0 94 IC*I 0 61 1 M �4 0 0 Id H rq U'. -1 V 0 V co 4) �? 41 41 rq A 'a :� en V V qw > C: w H H co lu H " w (d Its 8 114 H H qw 0 W U) H 0 H C4 04 0 r4 N Lm co 0 Nfn -w Ln %a r% c% 14 1 ri r4 rq r4 r4 r4 H 4 100K 7 P4 1 3 ci r- r4 a rl1 %- -44 r•4 ori m -T 0 4A r- to C4 O Ln W r- 0 1R. Ch 0% rq Ln w sr co C) cli 0 i w &n 6 H m All r4 -4 N m Nto .4 a% r- m m in r- CA in r4 ul qp C4 in -W m m f-f m vi M LM C30 Of I in q 0 b. -i Ln C4 Ln h0 C) 0 a v LM in Am r- 0 H -W fn CIA C4 In LM fli rl 0 t- 143. 0 Q1 CI H Woo -V w 0 In -7%0 co C"d C4 if P4 to 0 N %a 0 vi m 0 In 0 co co OOW 0 0 0 co N .4 -7 IRr cl Go N N eq C4 ri is 0 0 N N V-4 0 0 N m LM co in V4 C4 r- 0 fq LM Ql 00 t0 N r4 &n r r4 r4 Ol ri 40 in h 01 to .-q c) in Yl CO v M M %D in %o m CO N j. C, 00 L) 4) of go 14 Ix 41 C) lu Aj —1 - %D N 9 > V. Ch to, Id �4 0 rA co in 0 n Ag > -r4 to to to ON A (d go r4 OE -H og Ln U 1 0 as E4 j V u r.to 0 r: 9: 0 to 10 tv r4 --A .0 .0 C) m C4 u ej 0 q :c H 4 ? 'ru 14 Vi 'd 4j V I , 9 0 ? u 0 -W4 CQ N u u > in 0 > to 14 0 .40* g m Ln —1 44 44 41 u 0 1 V4 P, 0 V 41 C: H' 10 V 1% V W 14 14 ?44 41 w V 0 w 0 H u rA 9 P-4 gn x -0 V] I a 00 044 rd 4) m al > 1 -4 8 P� Cl—f 0-4 41 v fu -.4 -4 L) R IA u � 1 .2 A I t) Q m 41 ul w 440 14 N W 14 t7l %D I W -4 0 N V >1 0 9 E-4 0 C3 0 C: V 4J V M CO .4 a w ra 9 V q a 04 U 0 $4 4-4 V 0 OV iVAJH g OZLn q 0 1 (4 m :j cn v Go �l -r4 41 H 41 0� �4 4 40 P 41 P. �4 10 -4 § M g g 0 ►8 V �, C4 2 tn .0 j 8 zw .0 >-4 uwu>0>0>�4 u > It 11 it rq 14 m w Ill %D t- m r f N m V Ll W r% M la o N M m 'Ift BOOK PAST 0, w +} rl %0 IA Go r. O rV N to m 1- en M N r-1 •r O O r In Pl I'1 f'1 rl tS P) rl H rl Ch S k" s-4 fr1 N t0 tr1 Ln I ►. s1q / Ln •r 1 h o o m � v � t`"ti a► 1 o C1 0 o C► r� 1 sr N o to P1 N1 N O to O rcr` j f .. a% 1 m N N O N r/ 1 I en Ln to v O 'r,'•r N 1 r'1 cq '? !n O h O to O C N .i t11 'IS O H 't7 O G tr•1 �T m t0 rl N %0 �....PI 1 O In O O O to 0% . a% 1 O r-i 0% N n C1 O N t %0 � r 1 1 C% v V4 to a IV ._U; O 1 t.. 01 1 w Ln N 41 CC; <' (co I !� M tF f _ , iry Ill I lyLA f" n, CO I U co 4J � A' V V V V /► m �• . m (�4J -tf to O m O ACT'O ^'C7 rl Hx � o ro ., (d •r .r ro P4 r4 x -} a+ v) 4 0 0 If o m o v b •r ro a a+ m yyro yya x o 1 Id b 41 3+1R7 N"Jli �W a�iDa i7 u a .. I >1 tL >. 'I o o 1�., 1J x 4j M ia3lyt�'daS;t H,a0 0C: oa°� oIV 0 41 PC va�a G°.0i00I. 1 0+ w b a ,f( tt 41 .0 o .0 t .< z o z 1 t a s to ro m R ro ro I ro 1!1 +i I V] V7 7 •U1 +O1 �. 1 iL w Ai 1100 W o 4J q� w r•1 I H 4J rl 1i.• • ri �+ 1 —.-1 w w 1 at ro N L: •[f ro Ri •4 -4 -4 to •.i 10 ••1 •.1 •0 •t! m W hHroroatdk1s a1 V.01u 0OC410b7�RIoolovlo4) H � t 41 tv Z 0 -C4 to Haa>a>x1 t3l Ol to I U•1 ll v 0 v -I H O -4 L O Gl C 41 H ro to C C I �+ 3 ,o ++ -4 4J 4J A V• w• 4 rn a .i too v x m v m ►a 0 -44 m a+ } NC r+mC alt tow ro mO NU N a 4.)4J$4 CO cm�ooto �' �rom oE;x�4 w o ptai of I� 4vf cb & -4 -H•141 Hb av °awaah0a iA�a� wa a %a t co Q1 — 1� ri N r el IODK 77, if • <y y� ' 1 iiw�' •p'8! �" b Ln co fn &n CV r- r- 0 o Go coco an co N co a I a% r. cn fn 1 N 0% N Ln C4 1 at aO F, w co C, eT .14 1 CA co (D -W 0 0% 1 -1 1-4 Ln %n ch co %Dn 0o 490 C4 to Ln rl (4 0 en ON I N Ln 1-4 -W 0 Ln -W Ln Ln Ln A 0% r, %0 49 4,).Ar, Ln 0 ko 0 N rye A IQ C 41 rl N 0 -H 0 4) 0 4J 14 0 u 0 01 4j $4 -H 41 ou P 4)14 AJ 14 41 4 0 0 .0 $4 1114 i U) -4 $4 41 41 0 0 rn to N 4 C4 BOOK Oil) PAsE378' J co 44 L; a, .,I I 0 tpi 0% 14 14: co 44 Itz Yj b, $4 14 I NNN O '"'1 OOtOt'1r"1tOt0 Q' O al en C1 t` 1` N W N M M N N N tf1 N Ln 0 1 en r1 N N t +X t0 t0 M en 1e N N C .-1 .-4 0% 01In I •�:� 11 c+1 r1 N N N - t�}af<f• Q1 1 � ,t £ ^ z. r1 t M 1 to to N N I t I �' �`• N N I ri ,. Qt I n � � • �•` I tL1 Gi to to at rn to rA en en N m M v y a 01 I N N O O U1 1'1 Nl -W - 1D - t-1 1•1 I `•' ..+'i 1 I rl m eV N t0 m e•1 en 01 I N N -• - e� .. t i n t u C N N eV N co • W => -4 1 C 1 1 eh r1 cc I U1 to to 0 to r N .-4 t0 ' co N ti. ,. .CUU Ca WRUUUUU. 1 t% $4 )b 1 •� 1 ! o Cl) 0� r*- ,�` �" W C C. R7 � ' J� � • :.I p to I � � 4 ' O .COO 1^i3-+Uro.Iro u o vn 1x a r e-1 - ro mM V •O a w H . to m 10�i .�1 w w, a fn iJ $4 to $4 i i t V 1+ 9 O d a O roOt 4J O o I N I tl ro b O ro 41 v 1-4 z 1-'1 U V I tr U) r; ': W C7 i cL 1 ►+ C. to O a Iq 1 ro (4 K to to N H >+I-1 I Ch WC W In oza) 11roR N VV$4 co cj is i \ O O v) tT +1 O 40 ae d) 10 ro a Y) m :1 0% >1 V U ri H 10 V .-4 U P 0O 'O $4 H N .7e1 •�.e1 ya► ei U0rd (a Ito xwc°�to aHc°� a a I )ti• - _ �0H1 ( 14 N en O O .-1 N m V tt'1 t0 O +r. i4 f i W i cnco40 t v oOoO000 tom : to to to to to to to 01CMU N to 600K PA 0 Ln %D Im in Ln w 01 Ln %n C4 o 4 o en -w w en en Ln en 40 1 %4 co co co f-W 49 41 H 41 .4 in V I In W-1 C) "N 1.4 0 Ln 49 in in C% co co 0% N Lo 1 ry I 49 ez) 0 co a tn 49 m CV ch I -w 11 C4 co 0 %D cn -1 0 %0 0% 0 %D CP 1 1. N O o in r- C) 1 'o e, %0 C, Ln 4 w lw 'n %0 1 4 1- 4 .1 ri 4n qr NN to N �4 co 101, 0 a o r: 4) -4 10 > a > a 0.1 -1-1, 4 I0 H *31 0 g od 0 w p 4) 10 0 -4 A 1 t ' 1 :3 0 m lu 99 94 :1 V F-4 to V I 44 44 4J m 3: 0 u c u 0 0 0% -4 0 DWI 0 -14 CO H to 44 Aj 0% 3 ,4 -4 ,1 0 > '1 r4 Z: m m z 0 14 en "r Ln r- co 14 C) C) C� a a a 0 to %D w w w w w BOOK 036PAI"E.380 w 41 u, r., en fn .4 q 1 o Ln %o w o -4 r r t %D W C+ N M Go • � I.r + i tit , f f •" . N r r4 a, I b �'' ` •,w 01 1 O co N r4 N1 -W In 1 rr O r,.f 1 f r 1n 01 1t) t!! N ' '�r•+; 01 c0 %o to N ri CO N 1A 1 /D r ' I I r1 In in f•1 V M 1 N O r4 qr N O qr co %o ri �} 1 /Q « ^r 0, N co fo 0 0 00 to a -. i �, r•? ,�; i- M 1 O N (A r-1 r♦ r 14 CO N .. i 1 H qr Q fn QS r4 N fh N 1 t rf 1. ! A ItN rr•�.r.��'f'1 O1 1 � �+ O 1 fh co o co Ch ° 1 1 try co co to w s.• t ra a Y ent ta1L a" PI N y' J fG R1 U W R1 fA Ra W U to U 14.1 cq t ` 1 N ,k .9 H a) .1 AC ' -.1 +•CSC w o .1 x m 14 w 44 4� I A a a a° ro w a o s: 1 +1 U 0 7 0 0 - 4 0 a x a N to� OS a o H W u a l 4-, nqn � 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o r4 .-1 fG c4 U M W I r r r r r r r r r r r r N . 4 3�}i f. rho S � ; ✓ Y� �s r r .. 1 r 600K 036 PAGE 381 - owl OONOhQt�! OOOOON �PlMtnm-f �TOtt1C1CV1 �fI = IH III 1 QO Lnw rN.40 v tr1 V1NOG. QNOO 010ftfOM"r WU1CA a% V'Pltn-4 NOM! NNGoNinNw"o in "J ri C4 cm r1 17 41 r• �'7 , +thy "• .,L, ° W � 1 Ny I• a r,• fT at " M I fry 94 1 � r 1T I I r� O �.. f•. r, H f•r W f?'4 1 �p �c r O GO .. O N Vn.J GONM rl VOtofTVto O N! N:. O co O Ct tf! CO AN.10j:� cocoVI 'VI Ln N ;to inN10NO ! '� N N at N0P, ION +T0 000 IA NoO r1 to O to w N .-4 O Lt t!1 N V 1-1 Ot Q1 W M to rf U 14 — — — — — — — — — 7— — — — �' AAAARIRIAAAUUAAAAAAAAAAUA� -- U ^� I' t 1 O 9-4 14 to ... 4 N rV a 14 94a 4 W4 i >> t q 0 r4 t0 �j 0 U p 1 10 t t N J� !". r 1 t rd Id •I 1 t pfi 'C7 +1 .i t. �4No N Hs H N H Ham �Id A .-1>3s wgIwJ V. N I[7 Id O •11 ro O ". •• I .'pa' W Id 10 H t O M pro z w 00 0 LI 0 i� s t t J� W Lf 1 1 R:Ar>1P401-4 aai$4 b Alxd��rNl.N•1q�401 �p GU',t<T'.C7 U I N m A> f.. O C. V Q1 ri ri A N 14 O U rl •.1 .1 Q1 at ro ro w GI J1 ro 11 ri r♦ 0,11 .0 1 r-f JJ N 6! f/! A U IJ 0 0 Ln H 0 N rl � � 0 V 14 00 � fA UI y at I ,I.I •4 • 4 V7 •.� •� Id ro d a+ It7 0, c, w illa+ •.4 ..-1 w r, 1 auaac+I�.cuuAuaa >VVI�i1AC URN 0 W V 1 IS 0 (d . f y q ri ri O Id•.d tD � 0 0 W I+1 N I 11 II Itr. r1NM�IPu110o0C\Or1NMtfltDhOtTOrIMr'1�tzh000► O ^^^ H OO000000 4r•lwlrlrfrlrlrlrlNNNNNNNNN m PCtou Q I OO t0 00 00 q OO A CO q CO OJ q CO A 00 q 00 CO CO 00 00 0� 00 Ct! 00 00 00 •• •• •.• VI " m ! BOOK 036 PAGE 382 -rmwmlaaor`IaMm.rJWw at in in o m moMov•4NM0Mf-JJMNM or r- in w M �aMQ rl rINM-rm-C'Mrf"H in in la %T %a rl .i I-J r-1 rl tl' M. It R^ M of N N f cJ w'i s co -f M 10 r iY j N M in rJ , rl C`J 4 f In O" 1 C1 1a in 1 rf e 1 M .4 «. 11 Y �Q110m1pOn M 10% w 01 O r'1 O M V ri C1 in/10MvHrlN-1in {y Y 1 1- .A ►7 N r to in 00 1 !C1 -64 Ntnm (� I--ice,--�-r--AI�i-I--I1 11 '•^N' V+ f: m IJ O (y im rl�Cgi�� M OgR � 'O'la IV O rl 10 N rl LI Jj 41 W 11 0 N A O ai I N H .-1 0 a Id Id �-f U U �W -T.4 0C, 1 rl �pp etl rR�( D I ro ra ro q ro V V /a 00 rl JC G. Imo. 'J N '�I .'1< ,� J� d O) .'1< N Nl U m f Ca1 in -4 ? " '* I rl N m Vs in 1a r- q 01 O r4 N m qP {0 Ih Jb 01 0 "4 — w I M in r1 M M M M M en qr VI qP -W owqr v Re In in 04 4 I 00 CO OD q0 00 07 00 as 00 co cow 40 w 0 co 0040 00 Go v Wr — (/1 r v m q 1 C+ m o v r co %a �D N ►A 1-4 r r N i� If1 N N .-1 0 r-1 N 1 N .-0 9.4 Cr I P1 v a C1 , A in ,go 1 N 1A co O r> V' 'w O O V fn OD a} lA V %a w a1 N co 0% Ch M1 N co H H fn r 1n m r %a o r♦ + 7 •i i H ' 010 Qi M1 P1 CO ".> 1C t^I CO >: N E '7 f :7 Q1 tC V . CO n, N 1 d ti it Ifl r f70 O O� Q''. i6 i 01 r% IA .-t r Ii IA H N C% �••'+���� ww w �w u u ca aaw ww uu u CD V I I 1� ; ..>tA • 1 u ° V > ab o x a a s v N °' '�° 41 a 04 •° a a' b r ro Jr. -4 In yr rou �� ISSy, r; t o a -4 ro o aE o .f to 1� 11 ro r♦ a a a! ul rl EN rT a N 7 N b N N GOu �i CNi Ia .1 rarAo a 1r o o F� 1 7CT t ai -f .14 o VO4)ulWa 5 1 v v .4ao w o U ! N +i >r -4 to ro w R R 1 r. r� w rqF!/ t1 r•,rr .. i r a a az a � 'tf •-4Hb�+Ui -H���'+�j o o� ra � to a ,� > v .4 > a V H V "+ N i t O1n� O >r O a U 5 U ro r-1r-1 A H U to r0 O I •� r. r..� I u a�U.u>1V Uati4A4kV CDA+�rA►+�r�V�tJL I w U -4 ai Ca H O O N $4 h O 00 Ow V V 14 CO '., a. •, .. 1 C a �C ri � A w O O w O w ro al to -4 171 w •.f ,C N H a► f ( u v .-f u .t . f > a w a> i+ a A +I +i a +� a t1 a 41 +i 41 +i •.a -4 V .-1 A �NZ U0W=)0AGWZW pt': O 1 r" 1 N V' tD r CU OA O r 4 N M V' on W r +1 o0 0 00 0 o r♦ .f.a Hrq .r,1 CCU Ar t m a+ m C► m m C% rn rn Ch C% 0% C1 ai N lypjy yFay,.. v n s tivRPA'eii A " 600K,�� to coo In a cm %o In In 47A �4 4 en 'm in CN r- co X1, 0 CO in 4 co in at 1 qr ch H N O in 0 In C% all C% V cil go 13 co co 1— (31 at u L rj e:t al 0 $4 _92 a 8 13 V) tA fa 101' 0 41 4J 64 v P4 fd 4) N "1 14 V Z 0 0 N 00 r) otl �4 "4 P4 -4 C3 41 41 V ef OCC..r0i0I Id 0 00 a 4 0 All 4J 14 V 41 41 0 U 4LJ Z u u 41 u 4) pq in 0 4) In AJ 0% P. V Ai 4) W 41 go V CrI 41 V fie'0 w 0 1% 04 N V,17 Zw _E4, ZW E04 z. 14 rU fa 0 W V4 C% 0 ch CA Ch a% BOOK 'k'L'•'t. A; u+ r+ 0 0 0 _ %0 - o �n 40 co AA N {O 00 N Ln J' N CO 00 fn C1 1 toIwo 49 . 01 1 ti ti, av; fi „h r4 1 %0 gn ri 01 1 it N Lnn -W N �+ N 3� 0-1 Io 0 0 0 0 10 O� :1 v vl in o 00 N .. ILI w t` 0o N 0% I .-1 cc I y cm in U rU U U U U {3 •,,• � � L M-1 � • C �Y,. S ? 1 O IJ (oCh PC 1 N : ld y H ad W W 'd 1" M 11 �T i1 'Ci •O '. 'Ci � 'C1 it �_ qq1 qq11 �3+� r« QQO. pq pp 1•I ; JJ 14 1.i i Lai ch ►IJ4 d 41 m 0 In 41 0 11 � O, CO u H go r'I H H Yf 1 Pt: A a d a ro a �-1 :' a pt ,�,I , . c x zA.:zw zu"za1 -- .m I o N env In rQT�jj �Q1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 @Yt r s , :,4 Na�� fi 1 r fi..,.. 600K 036PA6f s r v C, 1 O N o O H v 10 N o O M a i-1 •00 o In 10 o ('14 M H N m t o "a N I w • • ' • • 1 .. N YI Sc3� .1 t0 -W i-1 N O- w w r1 4 ro O V b ... $4 •4 1 r.") PI rn O O b O O n N 1 r3 N -4 * N N ID wT O 't:- r-1 r O t r rn N w O qr O 1D O f!1 C1 1 O O O t0 %0 N O M r 4 00 O er t0 r +O'1 W P'0 r ti r-I N I w . w, w 1 1 an w M Nu 0 'C! R: 1. ° p4 - 0l e! ri N \O to O q) H N tD ri 'V' r rr M tli 1, v b J Y) M 0 0 -4 r4 41 :t p4 � O (� 'd A Iroi 0 cn 1� ION O� N O t0 O H O C► M n V 00 10 N O N 00 H M lot 3A �CrCiV t Q O e-I 1 w w w w w I w N � u • a �:: ci �1 _ ►mi 41 - _ 'm H m o r k � .0 1 t►r •a' O ' ro I tll •:'. b Hq O co O O , t a t0 , t0 co ly . «1i' 01 . I 1 . I w w 1 r. 1 f w O IDr-1 N 1 Y� -� m +: a. 00 H N rl 00 FFF++ N'. l) ti c, to too f-4 t .. lot ro +1 O, a W[� Vu D ,1.1, t JET 0 kr : ro r± 1� *'O C t Ol id +1 e• S] :: f~ r 1 :� i< ..) r 1 ro O t N 11. iJ _„,. y- Ir' Q1 •rl ro P4 :•r 0 0 00 0 ►, ro m ro m �q7 1 c INLM 0 1 0l w, U H y H 14 m X + 1 r 1 H %4 ro gg 10 •,1 o to o 4J In ro y. BOOK C36>y PAS``E387, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update.(Spring) % RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY 6EP1►RT--ME,-N,T TRANSPORTATION DIVIS,ION.:..TRANSP,ORTATION"qERVICiS TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS :10 3,4-4 T v�,� L' SERVICE VA a County -wide X or Planning District or Speci iFr (X) 1989-94DEFICIENCY: 123.1 LANE -MILE (quantity), (unit of measuremunt) 'Eroject, n Size of Cumulative. umber Proiect Name ,.This ':x ota Fro ect >[ 111th Ave (US 41 to Vanderbilt Dr.) Airport -Pulling Rd. (Phase 1) (Radio Rd.,,-. r.to Golden.Gate Parkway) jj,.tt-Airport-Pulling Rd. (Phase 11) (US 41 3*6 bn-1a1qmo06*1_ to Radio Rd.) Davis Blvd. (Santa Barbara Blvd.' to 2. 8!, County Barn Rd.) 9 Golden Gate Pkwy. (CR 851 to Ci'31) jj& q;,Rd. (US 41, to 1-75) 6-4-1=okal 16 6, 10 li'lwt-L, w(wo, "If;-T-CR 846 (1-75 to CR 951) *Zr- ? -4A till, 0 Rd s CR.)51 (US 41 to Rattlesnake Hammmock a 23.;4 leCR 951 (CR 864 to SR 84) DEFER 0 .0, ,1,2 3. �j',Isles of Capri Rd. (SR 951) (US 41;to,,,�.! 3 ,4� ,e Marco Bridge) CR 951 (23rd Ave.,S.W. to Golden Gate- ;2 9. 0 P Blvd Pine Ridge Rd. (US 41 to CR 3 1) _4.0 '33.0 ,'0'15q;Radio Rd. (CR 31 to Santa Barbara Blvd.) 6 '0 4-_;39.0 uld Radio Rd.'(Santa Barbara Blvd,.,to Davis, PEFIIt 39A* A4 Blvd.) t17o,Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (US 41 to Pol 4.0 .43.0 Ave.) .6190,Goodlette-Frank Rd. (Carica Rd. -to CR 846) �..0S. 0 � , 00 7Gulf Shor-i'Dr. (Vanderbilt Beach ' filth Avenue) IMOR 21 -Livingstone Rd. (CR 846 to imperial. and 12.4 60, E -W Route)' 22 Santa Barbara/Logan (CR 896 to South of DEFER -. 2._0' Green Canal) 023-,,Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (US 41 to CR 31), -,;' 6014 �.24 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. (Oaks Blvd.to CR' 0 '6?5Vanderbilt Dr. (filth Ave.to Bonita Beach DEFER 7.8 BOOK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT :.:.. First CIE Update (Spring, 1989) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY DEPARZmNTz`TRANSPORTATION TYPS"OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS DIVISION:•* TRANSPORTAti6li "SERVICES F.. iJsi: ' SERVICE a1REAi' County -wide X or Planning District or Special Area' j( (X) t i) lX) 1988,94'-DEFICIENCY: 123.1 tLANE�y��MILE''`C!� 5 *;nea,:': (quantity) (unit of measurement) j zb ict' - Size of 'di-AhkAVa Number <�Proiect Name ::.sty✓. 4.z-This i4ota .116 Westclock Rd. (Carson Rd. to SR•29) 2.0 72.6 2,70Ma jor Road Reconstruction " !� S i 172.E 264ftjor Traffic Signal Installations - J j ='`;` ='= = 72.6 29&Completed r: , ter. _ r.^BSc u r 72.6 30 � Completed :• . - r , , 72. 6 31",Bonita Beach Rd. (Vanderbilt Dr. to 1.6 74.2 County Line) 3r2''`Santa Barbara Blvd. (Davis Blvd. to • ` ' 8:0 y -u<>O 82 2 '. Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.) 3 ` County Barn Rd. ( Davis Blvd. to DELtEIt • P . Q uir'`ca IT Si.2 �T Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.) 34.Advanced R.O.W. Acquisition �" ; 81.2 35.,Sarson Rd._ (Lake Trafford Rd. to 1.2 ( •t'H 83.4 <' mmokalee Dr'.)8 i3a) ize SL 3,r6 New N-S Rd'.•`(CR 858 to CR`846) (: ,, .d"; .i:I 1,11:41a' 89111I 9V:8'' ' 37,'••4;sles of Capri Rd. (CR 951)(Golden DEFER (`'6.Ozg ao_tt, 94•a 3 �i) Gate Blvd. to CR 846) - { i :'. '38 -Pedestrian Overpass on SR 29 at Farm 94.8 Workers Village) 9eAirport-Pulling Road (Golden Gate Parkway. 5.2 rt1000 4*e}to Pine Ridge Road including grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway 'y W 'Goodlette-Frank Road (Golden Gate Parkway DEFER 3.4 100.0 to Solana Road) k �1vtPine Ridge Road (Airport Road to I-75 DEFER 4.0 including grade separation of Airport Road gypp## �2 Vanderbilt Beach Road (US 41 to Gulf DEFER 2 8 = 100 c 0 3 `TamiamirTrail East (US 41) (Davis Blvd. Oc0* w100;0 "w to Airport,Road) .: 40-`iamiami Trail North (US 41) (Grade 0 Oa 100';0 separation at Pine Ridge Road) 450'Tamiami Trail North (US 41) (Immokalee 0i0* =;'�' 106.0 (� Road to Laurel Oak Drive -- * � r �•M e00K UUG'pAGEW ��,� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring, 1989) P,--- RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY wa. DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TYPE..AF-PUBLIC_FACILITY: ROADS SERVICE ; \AREA °•,County -wide X or Planning District or Special Area, y (X) (N) X) 1994 DEFICIENCY: ►J �?! `'\, (quantity (unit of measurement Y ro eC Size of Cumula�ve er ,r, Protect Name— rq ota .46^+Tamiami Trail East (US 41) (Rattlesnake 0.0* 100.6 '�. Hammock Road to Barefoot WMS. Road) �,'4?', Tainiami Trail East (US 41) (Airport Road 0 0* 100.0 "cr ` t0_Rattlesnake Hammock Road ryF 48., Davis Blvd.. (SR 84) (Airport Road to100.0 Kings.Lake-Blvd.) ' 49 Davis Blvd. (SR'84) (Kings Lake Blvd. to 0.0* i00.0 -;County, Barn Road rt� i 01. i a. t � � ..... +... ..-»....•..ter.».. '�N {{ Stite-Roads do not add to County inventory e�*: Right'of Way acquisition does not add to County inveiitdtty, , 4 � BOOK 036 FACE 390 V. 77 O CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT rT—rat CIE _vPd&ta (spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 1 k6JiCfNVM: 111th AVENUE DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO VANDERBILT DRIVE (4 LANING) 1.0 MILE PROJECT'LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (T) (Planning District Nami), RESPONSIBLE AGENCY Cy IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DEFI 'C CTM Y DMSION:-TRANSPORTATION 0 a sureme s Unit of Measureme s LA/E MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94-Total` fide D /Pr6 _y ,ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Pr6je t 'i Size of Thi t: 1.d� FINANCIAL SUMMARY V, Pre - 'Total Year Construction Land /onstrzution Other Prior 1988-89 Forecast 1989 -90 Budget Year 1990-91 IOX4 1991-92 1091m93- 1991-94 Future 2 2 220 0 0 400 1500 227 2497 Total'"'y 2 ?6 400 1500 227, r 2497 IMPA7/10N OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE -OF- act First RaU,,of,I pact "TACIHTv_ Cost U� nit� $ )Z Numb of Un s Gro a Cost S 20 .r v 5 User evenue Z (years) A t Impa $ BOOK tiLlowe391 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT A 2 PROJECT NAME: AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD (PHASE I) DESCRIPTION: RADIO ROAD TO GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (6 LANING)f'1.4 MILES' PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES' (N) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DZPARTMENT::1.TRANSPORTATION ; 1988-94 Tota3.'Defici'encytll-"123*41'+1 ORGANIZATION:' -SECONDARY ROADS - - Size -of This Project:-'-`'=•'•2:8' i ' 'FINANCI)X'SUMMARY'(V IN THOUSANDS) 1 Pro - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total! Prior ' 1988-89 140 100 24 264': Forecast' 1989-90 �. {- 60 200 C0 1800 206 V 2266z i Budget Yaar. y , 1ir Y.J, Ito OVA r. o 991=9Z S¢�=I,¢l1L r: r�j7.�9492-93 c_fnn, 1p.9�93-94 Future Total 0 200 i 300'0^1 1 1800 230 j2530`1 :U iZMPACT,ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS : ESTIMATED: USEFUL LIFE OF r First',Year 'of Impact 89/90 r .-FACILITY 1w', } 4� Cost per Unit $ 172. r Number of Units 2.8 Gross Cost $ 4830 20 LesskVser Revenue - 0 (Years) �., Net Impact $ 4830 Vlr 9 } jF24'o� " Ct 11 ,92 t , r rf4 'SyY i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 3 ' PROJECT NAME= AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD, (PHASE IX) DESCRIPTION:. US 41 TO RADIO ROAD (6 LANING)j 1.8 MILES ' PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES ( Ik } ( Planning District Name) .M1 -sj s RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION ; Unit of Meamirement:,PrLANS'MILE:+1 DEPARTMENT:,,TRANSPORTATION 2988-94'Total Deficiency: r''123�1^` „r _ ! r ORGANIZATION:,'- SECONDARY ROADS Size; of i This: Project:;' ")TTI !l CR014 } FINANCIAL"SUMMARY' (S: IN THOUSANDS) 1 + Pre- ` Year. construction Land Construction ; : Other Tota1M . Y Prior 1980-89 + 260 10 270 � �w Forecast' 198990 1000.:` a 200 OF-1200: Budget Year 1990 9I ; 130 _ le -(1 X 9 =92 1288 ir992-93 4, 1993, 94 ! iQiBx y t. inure 1012 Total 260 1000 2300 3�40 :3900 Y wIMPACT.,ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS USErm 'P ZO w . LIFE OF First',Year of Impact 92493 :,FACILITY-!- x Cost per Unit $ 1725 Number of Units ; 3.6 3a zadawy Gross Cost S 6210 s .. "•20� :tava7 teas user Revenue - 0 n , �� ( years) eza.� y Not Impact S 6210 .z .f A y v „- r � y, •3•. 600K ; 036 P115t h � 1 v _.t � �"' "+sl 4 rye . 0 MENT FCAirst CIE Update (Sprinq�g 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 4 PROJECT NAME: DAVIS BLVD. (SR 84) '. A 80/20 PROJECT),, DESCRIPTION: SANTA BARBARA TO COUNTY BARN ROAD (4 LANING) f 1.4 MILES - PROJECT LOCATION: 4.5 EAST NAPLES - SOUTH NAPLES ', -, ;••.,�, ;-u, ' (0) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY• DMtj0N`1 _TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement;:; D1&ARTMENT:`TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:123.1 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This. ;Project;;,r^-,i_;; FINANCIAL SUMMARY,.($ IN THOUSANDS) ' ��'�' Pre- Construction Y/ar Construction. Land Other Tota.- t Prior j 36 4 V,40 *� 140 10 1500,.., 08-8J,5 Forecas t ( . is 1 19-90! � � ! � 10 �,� r •Sib Budget Year �~ 1991-92 1992-93 F9r Future 46 0 � I i 1500 154 xsr1700 Total , TUIMPACT'ON-FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ^','.": -j --- ESTIMATED USEF(tL LIFE ' OF First'Year of Impact NONE (STATE ROUTE) FACILITY Cost per Unit S Number of Units :. Gross"Cost. _ S Less"User-Revenue - 26 (years) Net Impact err 500K 636 PAGE 394 , �m M AL 1Kp&QL2= F CIE update (springEL2= 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM jTYPS OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 5 PROJECT NMM* GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (CR '886),.! DESCRIPTION: CR 851 To CR 31 (6 LAXING); 1.6 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY a. DMSIONt-TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement:., LANE MILE DEPAkTMEXT.-' TRANSPORTATION 1988-94, Total -Deficiency..--,--zj123 A - ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This,Project:., -,--.-3.;2,: FINANCIAL SUMMARY'($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- ar. Construction Land Construction- other Total Prior '891 200 5 Forecast 1989-901 Soo so $80 Budget Year 1990s-91i 1 1540 55 1992-93; 1993-94 eel Future ictal 200 800 1540 !240 :2780 WtIMPA,7r -ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATM, USEFUL LIFE OF First,'Year of Impact 91/92 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 1725 Number; of units 3.2 Gross. Cost - 3 5520 ION** Lesx-Usek'Revenue - 0 (years �yINet Impact $ 5520 BOOK 03 1 6?Afj! 395 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARYFORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 5 PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (CR 886)`' DESCRIPTION:" CR 851 TO CR 31 (6 LANING)f 1.6 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES --- --- (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement:''. LANE MILE' DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94" Total DefcienCyi'-" i23:2 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS i Size of'This' Pro! ect3 .2iv1uR0 a ' .' ,- _•..- FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($'IN THOUSANDS) i.s:Oi Pre- - Year----: --_`. Construction Land Construction other Total' Prior 1988-89 ! 200 - Forecast 5 ...-:205 :! 1989-90 8001'' �80 Budget ear • �•�,� � i55 1990 91 `i 1540 9 ffffff `Q1695 991-92 se-•,:ept 199293 1993 94 I ! i Tota7.-:.)__...� ._.: 200 1540 J '240 -ExM ''IMPACT,.ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS` 'f , .,'•� .. ; ESTED' IMATUSEFUL First Year of Impact _ 91/92 LIFE OF FACILITY:' Cost per Unit $ 1725 ; •,-�. ,Number. -.of Units 3.2 I Gross:Cost S 5520 Less User Revenue - 0 (years) •. Net -Impact ._ $ 5520 p_ 4�jl !-. 3c(�V��++ •�� n01C 'C'n C36 396 .1 PA,. 600K E CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM *r TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 6 �« PROJECT NAME: IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) _._..i DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO I-75 (4 LANING)i 3.5 MILES _•_} PROJECT LOCATION: 1&9 NORTH NAPLES URBAN ESTATES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY - DIVISION: TRAISPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT:.,TRANSPORTATION 1988-94•Total Deficiency: 123.1 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size.of This Project: 7.0 ` FZNANCZAL..SUMMARY`(.= IN THOUSANDS)~ --- {' Pre- f, Year Construction Land Construction Other Total y Prior 65 1988-89 243 '75 p." 500 818 Forecast ?,'';�� { { •ire.^�.>-..': ; 1989-90f 0? 210 700 3500 I50 456 ;w Budget pear i �F-DES"I 290 I990-91 `{�s 29 '92 - ttt� 1991 sJA 1993=94 Future i Total e, : 518 1200 3500-,-" 1522--- ----5740 'UP_!.IMPACT,_ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS, ESTIMATED -USEFUL :<< .-`LIFEr, OF First -Year of Impact 90/91 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 1725 Number of Units 7.0 Grosv.Cost $ 12075 :=FAT 1t,20.>dT , :! Less..!Viet,Revenue - 0 (years),j— Net Impact $ 12075 n.." ! 600K 036 PAGE .397' �A { p:If pm� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Updato (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM w TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT A 8 PROJECT NAME: CR 846 _ . _� _ , DESCRIPTION: Z-75 TO CR 951 (4 LANING)s 3.4 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 9 URBAN ESTATES M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON/_asureme DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION I Unit of MMILE DEPARTMENT: ,TFANSPORTATION 1988-94,.T:,;, 123.1 ORGANIZATION:: -,SECONDARY ROADS Size of.T6.8 I FINANCIAL SUMMARY,, (; IN THOU Pre- Year Construction Land /onstr'uc/ion Other Total Prior 1988-89 Forecast / ✓' i r Budget Year /, i rr-e �85 1991-921 340 10 i 935, >` 1992-93 f \ 340 257 .' _ ,�1.59,71 1993-94 230 Future f 4525 7.452r5. E Total OPERATING E IMPZI BUDGETS .. r., ESTIMATED, •USEFUL ..LIFE"'OF f �,� 'jr First, ; FACILZT'l'Cost• s ___.....saa:.,:.r Gr s.0 'i"Vset Imp_ ON ,,,,der '038 BOOK C36 PArc 3.98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ., TYPE'OF-PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 10 PROJECT NAMES CR 951 i �' Si:1 ,.it;T,I; 'i�: T'oRtj� ' e� DESCRIPTION:_ US 41 TO RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD (4 LANING):-3,A MILES ;.; PROJECT LOCATION: 50 SOUTH NAPLES - ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEX = r•s {t�) (Plann ng Distr ct Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: ... LANE.MILE DEPARTMENT:`'TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Tota1 Deficiency's ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project:'-'-=i�6�:8��*' FINANCIAL SUMMARY'(SYIN THOUSANDS) y i Pre - a ear �_ Construction Land Construction 'Other Total Prior 64 16 = •?0' 1988-89 ; 191 200 39 - A30: Forecast; 1984-90 32 80 ` 4900 202 IS-5214 Budget Year 4 •Z r 1990 91 300 OQ ` xr ,iv t 44J .Q-CA 1993-94 x .44 • 287 280 4900' 7 160141 •�` "r� IMPACT.'ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED'USEFUL OF Firm"Year'of Impact 90/91 `�'FACSLITY '� Cost per Unit $ 1725- Number+of Units 6.8 Grossr.Cost.•- t 11730 -`20 4 r, Less' User Revenue - 0 ( years) Net -Impact,_. ; $ 11730 * ',S4M z,, I~ r i Y�a"�, � ;�`:.,x� �•.,, ;'� why s SOCK C36PAGE399 ,�• R � r. . t rl '. Cv"e ,F 'T I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT A 11 PROJECT NAME: CR 951 eliL RIPTZON:' CR 864 TO SR 84 (4 LANING)t 3.0 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 3,5&7 GOLDEN GATE; SOUTH NAPLES• ROYAL FAXAAALM M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY /LE DIVISZONs TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measureme s LANE DSPARTMENT't' TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Tctah D iciencpi''r_ . ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of Thi Projects 6.0 FINANCIALSUMMARY (S . N THOUS. y ..►......_..._ _ S) . - Pre - Construction Land onstruct n Other Total Prior i " f988-89 180 l AS 196"1 Forecast 1989-901 37 50 .54., Budget Year ! ;i 1990-91 197 197.t 1991-921 276 276'' 1992-93 j n r;4k1 1993-94! j___4730 217 SOOT°' " _.. 4730 ` _. } ....o.L ,, ..".�fi _ 2IMPA ON OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE .,Op,, Firstly ar'of Im ct . FACILITY., (y; Cost- r Unit ; N ~, ^�! .:, .1Da 14_j a7 Hof Uni .. �• Or s-Cost.- S -r h .� s'User venue - years , et Impac $ P,r BOOK IiJU �oo PAG. „T e r K i r,� 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMA#(Y FORM ' TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT V 12 PROJECT NAME: ISLES OF CAPRI ROAD (SR 951) 3 DESCRIPTION:- MARCO BRIDGE TO US 41 (R/W ACQUISITION'ONLY)f.6.5 MILESi PROJECT LOCATION: 5,60 SOUTH NAPLES -' MARCO -ROYAL FARA-PALM' - M (Planning District Name) RBSPONSIBLE"AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ."" DIVISION:,TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement:.:- 1 DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94.,Total•Deficiencys,, .-- OR'GAuNI_ZATION:.. SECONDARY ROADS Size of This. project,.,,,.,........._ FINAPJCIAL, SUMMARY r(� -lti THOUSANDS��' Pre- Year Construction U. Land Construction Other Total , _ Prior - 33 345 7"116 t 1988-89 Forecast 2100 210 2310! Nd4it° E ' eat �.p`c] w 2 : f 00 ; fir .r. ze-ceei 1993-94I t j Future • 33 ME&IMPACT ION FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED .USEFUL First.Year;of Impact LIFE` (iF one Cost'ptvUnit 1 $ - 4 FACILITY I` 3a �. YE3 , , Number of Units Gross Cost $ 20 LessUser:Revenue - Hotsiinpact, s :} nsva. e 100K L NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT F rst CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE or PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 1 13 PROJECT NAMES CR 951 DESCRIPTION: 23rd AVENUE S.W. TO GOLDEN GATE BLVD.�(4,'LANING)j2:8 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 368 GOLDEN GATE - RURAL' STATES 5) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Mdasuremefits'—LANEIMILE I DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94'Total Dificiencry;C!"123.1'! Rd)aaZATION:; SECONDARY ROADS Sizi:bfiThis;Pio, FINANCIAL IN THOUSANDS) Year i Pre - construction Land 6onstrUctibn: Other Totimf f� Prior j 142 14 15 d i so 3900 .74 :4054 1 Forecast 1989- 325 rP 325 Budget Year .1490-91 991-92 1992-931 1993.;94 222 0 3900 13 -f4535 ftEal = 1?TR2jMPXC1ff'*OX'FU`r= OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED"USEFUt LIFE OF FiiA_-Yeai-of impact 89/90 -:FACILITY- Cost per Unit S 1725 NumberofUnits, 11.2 Grons,Coxt— $ 19320 20 Less( User: Revenue 0 years). A Not Impact $ 19320 7, f 4 150K 036 wr'402 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE.OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 4 14 PROJECT NAME: PINE RIDGE ROAD ; •. :XrA;i DESCRIPTION:. US 41 TO CR 31 (6 LANING) 2.0 MILES - -� PROJECT LOCATION: NOR NAPLES -CENTRAL NAPLES.C,;, 0(Planning D str ct, Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIM-TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurements-.,- LANE- MILE- DEPARTMENT:.;TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total;Deficiency ORGANIZATION;• . SECONDARY ROADS. Size .,of . This -Project,-.,,-,:- -- r 4.0 . _ i FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year. ; ;r. : Construction Land :-, - Construction,, ; Other Total Prior 1988-89 j 220 { 6 n tl 22j A` Forecas t' ;sfa ; a? 989Y 90" ' :' j 400 56 q45 Budget ear :f0tjhUR 199C-91� { 165065 ZA t,131 <, 9992 f r d 1992-93 1993 94 � re e'1it3`3 220 400 1650. 27 jk2�9 Total SMPACT •ON..FUTURE OPERATING BVDGETS ',,+,'^;,s�?r,-, ,;;?:T $ST'IMATEI jJSEFU}. � LIFE ` OF ! v First Year"•of Impact 90/91 ;FACILITY-1 Cost per Unit $ 1725 `. Number cf Units 4.0 " Gross Cost $ 6900 ��� ieisiUse=?Revenue 0 n.9vOs(YNirONaO'l Net Impact S or bw 036 nri 403 q,. 1�% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 15 PROJECT NAME: RADIO ROAD DESCRIPTION: CR 31 TO SANTA BARBARA BLVD. '(4LANING).;_ 3.0 MILES'!7 PROJECT LOCATION: 2,3&4 CENTRAL -NAPLES; GOLDEN GATE,-' EASfNAk;9S'�;'7,.j M (Planning District Nama) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Meaiuretient':'wd4tkite DOf. ARTMENTTRANSPORTATION l988-94':Total -_beiftcFferic5Vr$ it sj ORGANIZATION:: SECONDARY ROADS Project:Sizefci This` FINANCIAIs'tVMMARYT$ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - try Ydai Construction Land'�Construction` Otb Prior 1988-89: 209 600 j 81 Forecast 1989-90 1 �O0, 3700 n o ear Btidget 1 USs japbvil 1990-91, 20 19 - Cf9d log" 92 1992-93 ii-94 rdiaie 320 900,i 3700 _T 7 '- F-54111 M-'TMPACT'ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDdETS EFUL LIFE OF rieit"Year'of impact 90/91 FACILITY. Cost per Unit $ 1725 ac� Number of Units 6.0 C 7p Gross Cost $ 10350 Less; Uxeri'iti'enue - 0 Not Impact $ 10350 J;20 M cpal 1, - VIM, n eift BOOK UJb1.A(,g 404 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 16 PROJECT NAME: RADIO ROAD DESCRIPTIgN:,.SANTA BARBARA BLVD..TO DAVIS BLVD..(4 LANING)j;;1.5 LES PROJECZ,,LOCATION: 3 GOLDEN GATE (1) (Planning Di strict Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ATVISIONi TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measuremen z-/MILF. DEPARTMENT:,,TRANSPORTATION ::➢"" 1988-94.Total icien-`^123rI ! ORG}�IIIZATIOPi:••..SECONDARY ROADS Size ,o9 Thi ;Projec FINANCIAL -SUMMARY(; N THOU S) ! Pre- Xear f ...._;Construction Land • cnstruc on:; Other Total 1 Prior 1988-89� Forecas = Budget Year ` 1991-92 1 ,•1.�9r'92-93 1993-94/245/ i 6 r S` D� EeSt Ptl ure' 500 1815 57 a�281? T-- 24 500-2- 1815r y_J 57. .. `ZMP?►CT -_N,_ OPERATING BUDGETS r. �„ :.::.',' : ;I^ a, ESTIMATED;VSEFVt r Fizs£-Y rlof I act LIFE OF i Cost p r Unit ; Numb of Uni s ::-FACILITX:;� Gros Cost ; s'Vser� venue - t m a ; — .20 :» c•.•;(Years ._.-j INN 1 e IN . � 1 8 x ^7 � �•Y'� i too-< 036 rxsE 405 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update(Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 17 PROJECT NAME: RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO POLLY AVENUE (4 LAMING) -2.0 MILES -- PROJECT LOCATION: 4&5 EAST NAPLES, SOUTH NAPLES (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY— DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE EPKATMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total Deficiencyt 1230 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 4.0 FINANCIAL SUDMIARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other Total 76 8 1988,-89 160 �16 176 rorecast 1989-90 4 259 900 116 •1275 year-. F"t -91 3100 310 3410 1992-93 (,-Seel -94 Future ,i. Total— 495 90 3100------ --450—,1----4945 MPA'CT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESZMTEI)--USM74 Ell First'�Year of Impact 90/91 FACILITY Cost'�per Unit $ 1725 Number of Units 4.0 Gross Cost $ 6900 Less User Revenue - 0 years .z� $ 6900 Ile 10WITNP 4406's z CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spr nq 1989) _. .... PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r TYPE. OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 19 ( PROTECT NAME. GOODLETTE-FRANK ROAD t r DESCRIPTION: •CARICO ROAD TO CR 846 (FIRST 2 OF 4 LANES)1-2.5 MILES---i: ' PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES , ( Planning District Name) _ .. _. .. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE t DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 123.1 ri ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size -of This Project: 5.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY (i -IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Year--- - Construction Land Construction-Ot}:er -- -Tota .� r Prior r.'•�+.` 1988-89 200 �10 210; r Forecast 1489-90 , 1300 651A, Y *1365 JBudgetear ; Jet`:, . � 1 y r- 0 �S a r • ., 1990-91 �5 75 1991 92 +. 1992-93 1993 94 i .4. Total— • -- `- 200 1300 ---450--------�-165d }^ IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUI1.. s�• First Year of Impact 90191 'FACILITY = ` ,. Cost per Unit $ 1725 7 F^ Number of Units 5.0 Gross<Costs $ 8625 :20 1 a Less User Revenue - 0 (years). t '. Net -impact $ 8625 f �� 60DK 03)6 �407•,, 3 i^ 4�I it f�. ���"`�*_k✓� 'i 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 20 PPWECT N ME: GULF SHORE DRIVE. DESCRIPTION: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD TO 111th AVENUE (3 LANES); 1AMZ PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES M (Planning District- Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DMSION:.TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurem s._., E.MILE DEPARTMENT: , TRANSPORTATION .. 1988-94. Total D facie :,:..123.1. ORGANIZATION: -SECONDARY ROADS Size of. Th Proje t:,....... 1.3 FINANCIAL , SUMMARY' . (S IN THO ANDS -- Pre- - - - Year Construction Land /onstru/J-9n Other Total Piior 50 1988-891 Forecast 1989-90 / Budget Year 1990-91, 1991-921 1992-93j 93-94( ure : 80 100 ,.: �. ;. 725 93 as,99, A^ OPERATING BUDGETS ,.,- , .... ESTIMATED, USEFUL First;Y a=Yof I act ,:LIFE' 'OF f Cost- r'Unit ; ;,.,FACILITY., N of Un s' ...... .,,... ..... Gro s Cost $ s- Ltser • avenue - - t imp a (Years ` ; .., L, ♦ .' a% BOOK PA�� r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update. (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPZ'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 21 PROJECT NAME: LIVINGSTONE ROAD (NORTH NAPLES MSTU) DESCRIPTION: CR 846 TO IMPERIAL STREET PLUS AN E-W ROUTE CONNECTING TO OLD 41; 2 LANES; 6.2 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: I NORTH NAPLES (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DMSIONt-TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: MILE} DEPUTMENT i TRANSPORTATION 1988-94`io*t` sl: ii fLiie ORGX'aZATION& 'SECONDARY ROADS Size, �o'f' This Projecti FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other Total Prior 1 64 16 1'988-89 561 :56 Forecast 244 .500, 250 75 !at Year I VZO , 9 1 1991-92 :W-Lec, 992-9 �,e vei -94' 'A All 869 _T1 __Ti$0j .1 Y'$4�_jMPACT.CN FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL F r t;ir, aa'k'lcf Impact 90491 Cost per Unit S 1725 Number. of Units 12.4 1 Gross Cost $ 21390 2 0. Less' User' Revenue - !Lpt Impact $ 0- 21390 AO k If 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT F rat CIE Update (Spring 19 9) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT ; 22 PROJECT NAMES SANTA BARBARA/LOGAN '. •' •:' :'; DESCRIPTIONS CR 896 TO SOUTH OF GREEN CANALS 4 LANES= 1.0 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 3&9 GOLDEN GATE & URBAN ESTATES I ,:..�-.-._...... lN) (Planning District Name) Z1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measureme s L E MILEt UVATKbdI 'TRM32ORTATION 1988-WiEii'L�` 06 t ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size''of Thi Pr oj +.:..: .:.., ._ ... FINANCIAL SUMMP►RY :(S IN TH SANDS ) r Pre- Year_._._.__ Construction Land oust tion Other Total Prior 20 '-2- s 221 188-89 15 2 Forecast r ( '19:89-90 Budget Year i9-9i :e LVcir 1992-93 ! �p•se 1593 94 Er;I' 'Sr - t _.145 4S0 1730 235 :.r! ,. �ota1..1__ t i 450 1730 ;239 "2�599 ONOPERATING BUDGETS' ESTIMATED USEFUL of pact - LIFE„ OF '' FACILITY `'nit ; _..:,Un ZNumbo! s20' eVenue(year$.-_.._:_ ; y , ;It ; �4 1 f. BOOK [aPMEW Rhm CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ' TYPE or PUBLIC FACTLITIt ROADS PROJECT 0 23 PROJECT HMMt VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD "XirW4 6ESfCiij?TtON:- US 41 TO CR 31; (FIRST 2 OF 4'LANES); '2"2l41LES-- PR=CT LOCATION: I NORTH NAPLES A, (0) (Planning District Name) RESkNSiBr.t. AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:,,TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement; L -MILE! DEPARTMENT-t.TPLAkSPORTATION 1988-94..Total Deficiency:; 123.11 ORGANIZATION:,.,, SECONDARY ROADS Size.of This Project: 4.4 FINANCIAL _SUl*lARY- Pre- Construction Land_, Constru ction Other Tota Prior I so 7 1988-894 rbrecas 180 198 94 �30 V il,74 Budget Year .1300 1430 1990-9'.1 800 1210 76. �2S .e-0 1991-921 25 1992-93 C, 1993 C Totafl 230 2100, 1210, 3 3877 ON FUTURE OPERATING SLMGEtS.7 fi_�J Firs�_.Xeirof Impact 91/92 -LIFE'''ZF FACILITY Coit per Unit $ 1725 Number of Units 4.4 ` Gross -Cost $ 7590 _..-.. "- -02 ;...,;,�; ILess-fiser',Revenue - Net' Impact $ 0 7590 (years); - BOOK 036P A EfJ 7 T -1 CAPITAL IMPROV2= ELEMENT First CIE Update Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ' TYPE -OF PTJ=c FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT. # _24 PROJECT NAME! VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD DESCRIPTION:, OAKS BLVD. TO CR 951 (FIRST 2 OF 4 LANES); 2.9__MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (Planning District Name) °i.., RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY PIVZSIONt TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measuramaa i`r'` LA E`M2LEL; `rf DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Tota1 Deficien .ORGANIZATIONi,,,, SECONDARY ROADS Size o! Thix1?r6ject! S.S" t yj FINANCIAL SUMMARY.(S.IN.THOUSANDS),__._.___ •_ r Pre- Construction 1 Land__ Construction_ Other total Prior 172 439 1 61°'672 1988-89 23 400 1203 j163 u�`tf89 Forecast 191 Budget Year 1992-9 °-Seer 93-9 + Total ` 195 400 _ 1642 _ _ t,2 24 2461 yam• .:, .....,.. #' '! IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS' ESTIMATED USEFUL .^ _ . _ LIFE OF . ,, t First Year of Impact 89190 FACILITY,' I Cost per Unit ; 1725 ; Numbnr.of_Units 5.8 Oross�Cost :a�� Less User Rev6nue $ D 0 V years �,. �.,,. Net- Impact _ _. $ 10000 j F 100K Q36PA 4i2 4:r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY - FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 25 PROJECT -NAME' VANDERBILT DRIVE `ti:;(s,`a.Q � i'....4nr�«i�{;�,�! .�.�iH:J.7 ♦,'.la « ;F ." �E3CRIPTION:"'"lllth AVENUE TO BONITA BEACH ROAD (4 LAMING)j..3.9_ LES.i Y- 4 PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (II) (Planning D str ct .Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ._.. DIVISION:. TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measureme MILEi DEPARTMENT• TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total D icieacy i13. is ORGANIZATION:. SECONDARY ROADS Size of Thi Project 7.8 ,,:._...;aL41OR <Y.> FINANCIAL- SUMMARY (S N THOU 4suri Pre- _ Year J Construction Land onstruc on ^Other _ Total Prior r)r 1988-89 Forecast " 1989-90 500 80 S�0 r, Budget`Year 1990-91 80 90 /,1100 1991-92 3151992-93 _lee I45 � i51993 94tan �' 4600 50 -1100- r- 4600- 620.-... OPERATING BUDGETS � � 0 —,- , . , •-•.•..:., 8TIMATBD-BEFUL .�+� ,.... : f)..;lt ,F, "., . :20 LIFE•.r, OF � :.. First,Y ar of,I act FACILITY Cost'* r Unit $; Numb of Uni Gr s,Cost $ venue _ I r v;- .c K' yr 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 19891 PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 1 26_'.: PROJECT NAME: WESTCLOCK ROAD DESCRIPTION: CARSON ROAD TO SR 29 (2 LANES); 1.0 MILE i PROJECT LOCATION: 10 IMMOKALEE M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 7 :t._-;IQ;;_'.: DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of MeasurementuZ LAN1,_MLE1 DEPARTMENT::TRANSPORTATION 1988-94.Total-,Deficiencys;,^^a123:1 ORGANIZATION:- SECONDARY ROADS Size of This: Project: 7 2t_0-:;_� FINANCIAL SUMMARY.($ IN THOUSANDS) ? Year Pre - Construction Land.. Construction Other Total Prior S i988-89� 46 t 5 Forecast 1989-90, 365 500. 87 0t�t�g 95� Budget Year { 1 7c9: lap—E vE M, 1991-92 1 :e-feel 2992-93 1993-94 Future Total' 1 46 365 ; 500 � i92 r,:!10. 3 g-1-2rZ':VWACT.ON.FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS--. ESTIMATED -USEFUL LIFE OF First. .Year of Impact 90191 ; ;: FACILITY _ •. ! Cost per Unit $ 1725 Number of Units 2.0 GrossLCost $ 3450 20 Lessz.User;Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 3450 BOOK UJUP214f 0 -CV h CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT z First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r: TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 4 27 PROJECT NAME: MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION (ROAD &. BRIDGE .SECTION)"r': t".t DESCRIPTION: AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS PER BCC APPROVED ROAD PROGRAM-- -- �f -" (FY 87/88 THRU 93/94) PROJECT LOCATION: (fit) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DZVZSIONi-TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement! "' DEPARTMENT:=TRANSPORTATION 1988-94.Total'.Deficiency!.^:�.'::c, . ORGANIZATION! -- SECONDARY ROADS Size .. of This•' Pro j ecb!')?TA. �'VA; l;.^" , i - FINANCIAL'SUMMARY.(;IN THOUSANDS) Pre- I r� Year Construction Land Construction Other Tatal Prior 1100 io.1100 • 1988-89 1 � 660 i -F_9(661 , Forecast s I*t89 90 � ' 2 Budget �Cear _ _ 810 + E xsa� 38t�i u9 ` ' '" ' 91 j 2 400 1e'-cec 2}, 1y991192{t 2 t 460 :£-Zf r462 1992-91 2 ; 455 ; _ ��C45? 3 S , I 9� 3 1150 �uure 7 4200 - 9ri4207 ` Ifota1 . 19 9235 _zt:924, 'UaIMPACT-ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS'.' ESTIMATED=USEFUL LIFE OF �e,. First Year of Impact FACILITY:"'; r Cost per Unit s _... Number of Units :3� t. Grosz Cost _ $ LesssUser'Revenue - 'aa20c:, c' , ° • a ,kt Net Impact •z(years)4=a' W1. s e00K a �i4, 415T au •t : i 3. r J • �� r~— CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT i 28 PROJECT NAME: MAJOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION _ DESCRIPTION: AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS PER BCC APPROVED 5 YEAR PLAN PROJECT`LOCATION: _ (N) (Planning D str ct Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY - DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: i • .:.;:' .ice,':-;�.�.s'�' :ti,�=��.�G� +Deficiency: DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total 7 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY - ($ - IN THOUSANDS) -------. -- _1 ..... _...._ Pre - k Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior_ R - _ __.. + _._w 455 _ �; 1988-84 4 433 437 Forecast K 1989-90 6 615 i~ 621 BudgetYear - i 1990-9i 6 450 4�6 991-92 7 660 ! f �•Ieet 3992-9l 5 385 390 j 1 993-94. 5 500 Sb5 E { e c ee , Future 30 u 3500 . � ..... , - _. 7061 " ..mot . 63 ____ _.�.! 6998 ,, __. w_. MPACT`ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED -USEFUL _ I First Year of Impact 89/90 FACILITY "= Cost- ,per• Unit $ 4500 Number of. Units 10 ;V71, Gross Cost1 $ 45000 'r, 20-• I + y Less.=User Revenue - (years)_-.!:, ., Net'Impact $ 45000 r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT CIE Update (Spring 1 89) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 31, PROJECT NAME: BONITA BEACH ROAD DESCRIPTION: VANDERBILT DRIVE To COUNTY LINE (4 LANING); IA MILES`- --'-- (HALF IN LEE COUNTY) PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (Planning Distr1ct —Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE Mir ny Dffikk MEt TRANSPORTATION 1988-94' TAAiefic- l ORGANIZATION:' SECONDARY ROADS size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY ,($ IN THOUSANDS) Year Prior 19 0-90 Budget 'Yi 1019 0, 9 1 to", , , I 1992--91 Pre - Construction I Land 150 100 700 Construction. 1-.Other.-j--_Tota1 s- 8c, C I 25 re 1155 105, 7 M, so 19! dr Total .150 Boo- 1155- -210-1 23 '.'IMPACT.ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED' USEFUL LIFE OF• _,, ; - First Year' of Impact 91/92 L:.-FAC.ILITY Cost per Unit $ 1T25 -- 111 Number -of Units 1.6 Gross.'Cost $ 2760 20 - Less User Revenue 0 Net --Impact-$ 2760 'A a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT A 32 PROJECT NAME: SANTA BARBARA BLVD. DESCRIPTION: _DAVIS BLVD. (SR 84)..TO RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK.ROAD.. (4.NEW LANES)i 2.0 MILES _J PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (M) (Planning Distr ct.,NZe) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION �, .... 1988 94 Tota1 Deficiencyi_'!i3_J ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 8.0 i FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($_IN. THQgSAp )�,�y Pre- Yeai Construction Land Construction Other-�TotaZ 1988-89 Forecast + 1989-90 Budget ,Year yi v'z' 230 550 78 { r 1991 9Z. �" 1 250`1 , # 2420 " j177 ? f. 992 93 90 i993-94-�?Q� ` Future } I -e-wn Total 230 800. 2420 ._ ...._i345___ IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS �... _ . _ _ _ _ _ ESTIMATED `USEFUL Pirs�Year�of" Impact 92/93`" ...,LIFE., OF j "FACILITY COSZ%er Unit S 1725 Number -of Units 8.0 Gross Cost 20 Less User Revenue - - - - Net IBcpact $ 13800 (years . y " 79a•! i )J 9 e00K 036 FAr, 419 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fir3t CIE Update (Spring 1989) ` PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OP PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 0.33 PROJECT NAMES COU7= BARN ROAD yr DESCRIPTION: DAVIS BLVD. (SR 84) TO RATTLESNAKE RAMMOCK ROAD (4 LAMING); 2.0 MILES PROJECT LOCATIONS 5 SOUTH NAPLES �.__>.. .�. (N) (Planning District Name) x.. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIEN j DDMSIONs TRANSPORTATION Unit of.Me_a_7eAe ti DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total ficien s 2I 3.1 i ` ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of Th Projec s 4.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY _(• I QU Y., IPre- Year Construction Land orotrd6 on Other "'Total_' Prior 1988-89 a7x Forecast )p -Qfi.p t Budget ,Year ;4 1990-91 2 00 1 22 C2 52 1991-92 64 4� Y::.. � 1992-93 1270 C..rf27.0 1993 94. r t� r. To`E'ai",' ; _ ..: 230 620 :,..._ :2665 5 «• 3$'}1 VAON OPERATING BUDGETSc ESTIMATED.USEFL�L. of Im ct FACItITY,xanit,Unit t ; R enue �i $tt SOCK %� ,i ` 1. }.Y �vi.•�'T.1���aQ�.' - 'V I}r �Y'�'''k€ M l._ � ! i � V`9i+�. w , 4�:; 'I •f 1. i d.My�yy/..1 Tf� �i y: �' CAPITAL IMPR�--,4NT ELEMENT Frr—st CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARYFORM F-T] TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 0 34 PROJECT NAME: ADVANCED R.O.W. ACQUISITION DESCRIPTION:.,, PROJECT.LOCATION: N/A (i) (Planning District - t .1 Name) -A�-�%! =13LC", V�Lll� -1: RESPONSIBLE. AGENCY IMPACT ON DW-ICIENCY-- DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT! TRANSPORTATION a 1988-94 Tioit'ad'' Diei-c"fincy: ORGANIZATION% SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2CAOR FINANCIAL. SVMMY-($-IN-.TEOUSANDS)-- Pre - Year Construction Construction Land Other Total P, 1988 891, Forecast 200 ow gat Yeark, 1990-91� 200 199,1-92 200Qi 4 992 3 - 200 1993-94 200 r tj T rt2I 0 � Future 1500 2500 2t 6 6 7--IMPACT. ON. FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS- ES' IMATED_tfftFUL r rxl� Y� ar; NIX pr ) Cost perAfriit $ . Number of Units Gross Cost $ H/A Less User Revenue - $ ears '14W -ISIWAC-0,4—as " 100K C39 PAGE F1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 35.' PROJECT NAME: CARSON ROAD fi DESCRIPTION: LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD TO IMMOKALEE. DRIVE (2 NEw--tAitgf- MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 10 - V01OKALEX--xr M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILEi- TRANSPORTATION 1988-94'Total Deficiency: 123.1 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Projectt.. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($'IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Construction 'Land 'Construction" "b1her— —Total Prior 27 3 3 Torecast 215 250 47&-4 filttj Budget Year jqqp-91 All 0142 f,992-931 e Doe, 2157- 250 Total--:— 27 f ID PACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS USEFUL First Year of Impact 89/90 Cost per Unit $ 1725 Number.of.-Units Gross - Cost $ 1.2 2070 1- Less User Revenue (years) Ndt-IMpatt' 2070 wt BOOK m4ZI CAPITAL IMPk • %MF.NT ELEMENT F rst CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs ROADS PROJECT 1 36 PROJECT NAME: NEW N-S ROAD T6 ^. DESCRIPTION: CR 858 TO CR 846 (2 NEW LANES) s . 5.7 MILES t• PROJECT LOCATION: CoRKSCR ► �Y , (PPlanning. District Name) 1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY . DMSION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:;'123*1� ORGANIZATION: —SECONDARY .. SECONDARY ROADS Size of This, Project:?;; , 11-,_,4nl 70 , . FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year .,.r Construction Land,,,,, Construction., Other Tota. 1988 89' S Forecast 1989-90j .193 - - ? e193 Sudget 'Year 1991-92 ' 1992-93: 'C"� ` .� -i: r• . sa Future '193;t:, s 9 txMPACT:ON�FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS, ESTIMATZD,,_VSEFL�L LIFE OF First Year. of Impact 89/90 ,FACILITYw'; Cost per'Unit ; 1725'` 1l1�%"J. K w Per .l.I Number of Units . 4 t :1sU 4d sa in aross',Cost ! $ - 1 6 + Less -.User Revenue - 0 • ,,'..(Years) :NY.. � Net 'Impact $ 19670 -- ` Y � M fig.. ,y�, ��•` BOOK kGE 422 CAPITAL IaE2y2= ELVKWT First CIE Update (spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT- # 37.. PROJECT NAM: ISLES OF CAPRI ROAD (CR 951)t'" C DESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE BLVD. To CR 846 (4 LANING); MILES i r"': -/-i, PROJECT LOCATION: 8&9 RURAL ESTATES - URBAN ESTATES M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:. TRANSPORTATION Unit bf Meainiriiieh - 1A DEPARTMENT: ,.�TRANSPORTATION 1988-04- Tot-af--'"is en ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS 4 - Yeah Prior 1988-89, Forecast 1989-90' Budget Year `,-h 1990-91" 1991-92 1992-93 , ,, , 1 1993-94 muriTotal l FINANCIAL SUMMARY Pre - Construction I Land - 130 19 ,fN THOUS S) Other 85 15 f. 54 4 3410 0 130 3410 484 'FUTURE AERATING BUDGETS" ST` 'I M"A,-T, 6 1, USEFUL LIFE OF First y r of I Cost P r Unit N of Units Gro Xost— ai Vser Rev Se t ZWmpact ks! ,y " Lov ,)FACILITY $ $ "Z _ (yearq �.rr 'A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 0 39 PROJECT NAME: AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD ,.-..- . .... DESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO PINE RIDGE ROAD (6 LANING)j 2.6 MILES (including grade separation",at Golderi:Gatd.Pk,4y). PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES ... (i{) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ... DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of Measurement:,LANE MILE..! DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94, Total,_Deficiency:2� 123.1{ ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This,Project:,.,,5.2 ..f FINANCIAL SUMMARY_ ($ .IN Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Pf or 19888 V Forecast 1989-90f { Budget Year OQ�I�Ld3 19 0 91� y 1 1000 00 . i�_ .w 91 ' 921' { ; 4000 420 - ,. , 92 93� ( 3000 390 ,420 ' *��, i E w �� 1993 94' 2000 { :(07 40 PQ•F .L Future { 3000 fl0�p0 1000 4000-" .-� 8000 _._..._ " ACT' -ON -FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS-, ESTf TED ISEFL�L "OF .. .. _ LIFE'* First Year" of Impact 91/92 -FACILITY, . Cost per Unit $ 2000 .. _ Number of Units 1 �# Gross .Cast s 2000 - ._ ='�' - 20•-�" S Less-L'ser_ Revenue - Net Impact S - 0 -- 2000 - -- - - -years 0V9.1 n't t79.7 ��saa�2 1eK BOOK 06 PAI E 425 fsl,as.� r rr r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT W :``` F rat CIE Update (spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT ! 40 w PROJECT NAME: GOODLETi'E-FRANK ROAD DESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO SOLANA ROAD (6 LANING)f"1:7 � ..PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES y (S) (Planning District Name) y'. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVZSIONi`,TRANSPORTATION SERVICES -Unit- of Meaauremen : 4 bEPXRTMENTt TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Totaf,b , icleiG i JW-h t . ORGANIZATIONt-'SECONDARY ROADS Si a of Thi Project �:3:ArJ'W o4 ( FINANCIAL:STHOUS S) { Pre- ! x<• Year s Construction .Land'-- /on/struct- Other total Prior ` 1 N* 1988-89 yn! • Forecast ([ f Budget Year t ~� 1990-91, �, 4 ;` 15 1991=921 r:: j �``� 15 1992-93' 30 e, Abe: \2210 TOtkl } •� 30 i 2210 '253 2763� ;• 3a1MPACT N OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUb 3. _ , LIFE OF j Firet• •Y- t' of I ct = °FACILITY 1 Cost p r Unit ; Numb of Uni fro -Cost"". $ t�Usert venue pars t�Xwac t '= s4T d � � a K t f � SOCK �jPAGE � 426 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT.# 41 c ss PROJECT NAME: PINE RIDGE ROAD; D$SCRIPTIM ,I -AIRPORT ROAD TO I-75 (6 LAMING) s !. 2.0 .MILES '(including grade separation at Airport Road)5` PROJECT LOCATION: 9 URBAN ESTATES " (A) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON /EFE11�tT-;T'f77 ; 1 DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of MLE, DEPARTMENT:!TRANSPORTATION 1988-94,:T .F,,2123:1per ORGANIZATION:. SECONDARY ROADS Size of T- �.'ra•� ' ,> FINANCIAL •6UMMARYA'0 N THOV S) ... Pre- { r. r Year Construction Land onstruc 'on Other Tota Prior X' 1988-89 i Forecast f: - ++r . / 1989-90, k,3 Budget Year 5;,L_,C 1990-91} 900'`�"'� 90 :E;-E 990 1991-92; 35 0 i �50 3850 .09 1922793i �S �� w 24 , F.e 199�94 ' ! `'•� 90 D429Q Future ��6010 90 �s,5300 90 3500T 6010.: b!4t �Y,2.1l54 ngB IMPA N OPERATING BUDGETS - . nr ESTIMATM,' USEEX& LIFE OF Fira�x Y _ rT of Imp ct I FAC LI=1 Coat, p r Unit t $ z3..L. 1 .1 Esc: of unitx is a a Gros Cost $ 20 fir L s7 Vser + R enue - ( years ,77,7 i -n t Impact $ •'r ' y p n t ;, .. BOOK UJ64E,4 7.'•t�' • « CAPITAL IMPRO� ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) h, PROJECT SUMMARY FORM WP8 OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 42 n' PROJECT NAME: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD s btSCR.IPTION: US 41 TO GULFSHORE DRIVE (4 LANING)t-,1:4;MILESZ'yz a`..7. ,c PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (N) (Planning District..Nama)._.._.__ RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ``' DIVISION: 'TRAYSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of Measurement: LANE- DE"PARTMENTV TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total D`+icienCp 123.1 . - ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of Thi Project 2.8 FINANCIAL SUMMARY-(S ._THOU S)-------..- Pre- /ons ... ar Construction Land true on Other Total Prior 1988-89 .•r;-,.,mot•, , Forecast i ' 1989-90: 400 `20, 9 :ov420 Budget Year r; 20 201 ' 991=92i 147 _1347# 1992493j i � ��• sees r AE Eeei e * 1993-941 j 'Y Future I - ___...... . 3400______--,._ •.— 2400 %iai .,....... ..1. 4 �w ..L__ 340018? r�3 IMPA7Uni OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED VSFirst`Y _,FACIL7� aoU y, Coat= ___,_Y ,;oro s--Cozao^ ss��s'Vse(years ; . r . Y } 3 •'S�i` - r 4 °: 5 600K r 030K last CAPITAL 114PROVEMENT ELEMENT F rat CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 0 43 ?ROJECT NAME TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US 41)," DiSCRIPTIONC!"DAVIS BLVD. TO AIRPORT R:Ohb`-� PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (i) (Planning District Name) W&SPONSItLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY` I ,.,7 DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE 1988-94Tot!!1.Deficiency: wli '77 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size,of This Projects FINANCIAL Pre - Year Construction Land construction Other Total Prior—, Forecas- BWget Yeak-_ IN 470 (150) -��470(r 50) 1991-92 1 6700(2620) 101A igi-931 fi 3500 1993-94 kt'ure VC- C-OV . �r �4 , ij:ZbM To 470 IMPACT ON -FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS'-_J y ESTIMATEI3.USEFUL Uuzu C-11 Firxt0Yeii*1'df Impact N/A $ 6C Number of Units Gross Cost Less- Llter,_Revenue U zl'�i Net Impact) 1 $ STATE FUNDS .46 0 * CAPITAL rst CIE Update i ate (Spring LEMM f9) !��• PROJECT SUMMARY FORM t TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 1 44 PROJECT NAME: TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH' DESCRIPTION: GRADE SEPARATION AT PINE RIDGE ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: 1&2 NORTH NAPLES`& CENTRAL NAPLES ION: ( 0 ) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY . - ... . , , DMSION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of, Measurement: DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:. P' ORGANIZATION:_ SECONDARY ,[ ROADS, ,SifZeois Pro j ect 1 FINANCIAL SUMMARY �($ IN 'THOUSANDS) + u, Pre- � Year Construction Land Construction her ota r Prior 1988-89+ Forecas Budget Year •+ --,;j n r 1990=91j 1991-92 i CQ S`eu a � 1993-94 �10000 Fu O !c + —110000 ;MPACT=ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS- ...- -.. } , ES�ft T-6 jj�S' ,.' First Year of Impact N A LIFE OF" 'FACILITY Cost.-p-ar - Unit $ r ., Numb' erof'Units ' Gross Cost' { $ _ . , 'Ibi 1 °7 to twss-user Revenue - _ Nat Impact $ " N Years „ A ., �r'. 60D VJII PA,i ims CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN ET LEMENT F rst CIE Update Sppr ng,1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS r r PROJECT # 45 PROJECT NAME: TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH (US 41) DESCRIPTION: IMMOxALEE ROAD TO LAUREL OAK DRIVE PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES M (Planning District Name). RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT, ON DEFICIENCY DMSION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of Measurement:' LANE MILE' �. DEPARTMENTt TRANSPORTATION I988=94 a ' iflvfi �ofl` i�eftcletuyi a . ORGANIZATION! SECONDARY ROADS Size of^This'Projectz pAr?!'Gf . FINANCIAL SUMMARY" (! M THOOSANDS y ` +" , P..•'L ' __.._.._.. Pre- Year„,_•„,-- Construction Land- Construction Other._. __Total Prior FMT Forecast + �� P>.. wgat:" ear, } . 1990 91+ 1991 92 1515 (504) 04 �1515�� 1992 93 4 ! ;np " 1993 941 5609 {loco} 609{1 001 Total Isis 5609 � ipo IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED US _ 4.' F rst ,Year, of Impact -� - FACILITY _. _-. wi;e' peg. Unit $ .Rs Number- of•.Units r .- - Gross' Cost- ; 20 Less User Revenu© - •_ __._ _ ai'.+ years)~fir Net Impact +STATE FUNDS { S } - DEVELOPER FUNDS mow. P, raw y; may' rt --.f. MLA: s•. �,k r D: `�. n ♦ (y t y. CAPI ALIEIUMPR=iELngEMZ1NT CaOteMSp0) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF, PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT.,NAmz'. TAMIAMI TRAIL EMT DESCRIPTION: RATTLEsmAKE HAMMOCK ROAD TO BAREFOOT WMS. ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: 4&5 EAST NAPLE-q LjqnTrm "IDLES w (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:'TRANSPORTATION SERVICES unit of keastirament: DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total Def iciency:• ORGANIZATION,' SECONDARY ROADS Siii-6f This P-6j' r ec FINANCIAL -SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS).--_ Pre- Construction 7 ;Land 1 Construction .-Other-. Zoota Prior i 9 Forecasi tuft"', 9-901 no n�P,r Budget Year 90-91 i 1196 i !e 199i-92 e 19927793 =99 42� 4428 94 1196, -1.-4428`-- ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS iS2'1MATb"*SEFUL First*Yea'r of Impact N/A t WItITY, 7. 4; Cost per Unit $ Number,of Units 1.0 Gross, -Cost---- 1 $ LestUter Revenue .15 Net Impact $ _ Years g00% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FARM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 47 PROJECT NAME: TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US 41). ' DESCRIPTION: AIRPORT ROAD TO RATTLESNAKE .RAM?= ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES -+ (t) (Planning District Name) ` RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY- DMSION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE t DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1988-94,Total-Deficien cys- "'T�� _ - .. ' ..- .. ,.. . 1. rr"J. .. i 1 .+�.�•� ✓ • .... u ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size .,Of This.Praject:„__ FINANCIAL SUMMARY.($ IN THOUSANDS)_.___ r t _._ Pre- Year Construction Land Construction Other Total -- ., _ 1988-891 t Forecas_tn E 1989-90:.:; 1 678 � Oil � Budget Year a 6 8 91 2509. :sg' 1g91=92 to + < r 1 j-93; (501) fif ' r p i Ito'! `1993 Future � ' 3 _ 678. __-,T.._.._.,_250977__._ 1 eYuru� ACT ON: FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS - ESZ'IMAT'�g P�rst;Year„of Impact N/A Cost per , Unit ; - — y r o FACILIY...t y E Number of Units Gross Cost s _ _ _. Less -User _. " _ _.. aa�• , "Revenue Net Impact ; - ears)- 19,194y o3T 1 f ,e BOOK S. C91 CAPITAL IMPRUviMEXT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARYFORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT 48.., PROJECT NAME: DAVIS BLVD. (SR 84) DESCRIPTION: AIRPORT ROAD TO KING. S LAKE BLVD. PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES T M (Planning Drstrict Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: .,TRANSPORTATION SERVICES -Unit-of Measurement:.,LANE MITE DEPARTMENTs-TRANSPORTATION 1988-94.Total. Deficiency: ORGANIZATION t....-..SECONDARY ROADS. Size. of This.ProJect: FINANCIAL 'SUMMARY ,($. IN THOUSANDSY Pre- Year Construction Land Construction Other Total rs Prior 1988-89 Forecast 1089-96 786 i 2912 ?698 BudgetlYear 3 ire (300) (790) 1992-93 Future. Total 1 786 - ---- i050) ---2192 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS., ESTIMATED -USEFUL 10 L-,OF-,-,OF First- Ye'ar of Impact N/A FACILITY Cost per unit, $ Number of Units Gross ;Cost $ re4jV-,User-Revinue 10 20dr,_-,"1 ears) Net Impict 1 $ s) = STATE iuns y A� CAPITAL IMPROvEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE—OF.PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS PROJECT # 49L '- . PROJECT -..NAMES DAMS BLVD. SR 84 ' DESCRIPTION: RINGS LAKE BLVD. TO COUNTY BARN ROAD PROJECT LOCATIONS 3,465 CENTRAL NAPLES ` ` q,. __.._ M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY - a,-,• " DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Unit of Measurementi�t.ANE-MILE-`41 #+' DEPARTMENT. -'TRANSPORTATION 1988-94 Total DeficieriCys' ORGANIZATIONe•l`• SECONDARY ROADS Size --of This Virolect}.,=TR t✓" FINANCIAL SUMMARY'(S IN THOUSANDS) ' _... .__._. _ atpT ,;r Pre- i 1 j Steam .�_ `Construction Land '- �` Construction ' Other 'Total Prior � i 1988-8� .. � 3-d69t Forecasit i coc�xo'1 49-90 ! 605 ... Budget Year xGgY ��+tuH i �0-91 i 429 f-ttie42 1 2240 # P 1992-93 Futur* . _ t 605 429 ` ; i 2240 `j��32y4 _. .____...._... _._.. _ .___...:_ . IMPACT, Ofi FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS': :TED USEFUL LIFE OF First Year of:Inpact N/A FACILITY"' ^Cost per Unit, ; y . Number of Units Gross-- $ _. ...._ aC,:rz0.50: 4 Less Uidi Revenue - _._..._ years) Net..IrApact .__'_ -"I ZTATZ a ; f:'rrc� r 44 x, �5 too K R3 �`• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMMIT First CIE UpdatA (Spr ng, 1a89) t ram. RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISIONt ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ' 4'F , TYPE_OF PUBLIC.FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES..._..._....._ sERvxcE _AREA:.._. County -wide or Planning District or Special.Area..X 1988„�4-DEFICIENCY: 28.689. ; t quant t��) (un t „of . m.asurement), u' ro ect ;;,, _ Size of Or-Cumu at vie! " Prolect Name Th s Pro ect Total 200-A - Water,,Managem*nt Master Plan.; ,; 404 404 200 D Individual Basin Planning 1 1,040 1,444 . �. T;'7i`..';; � ,• � LYGP Z L7GS:.`_;,r' .it; ;.; ;Zbfl'!' f Q?r'L �t 6 rc,rr7�S .. n tY y �J y tf7 »P ;P i • ,i i `-�� i l{.�U •.HOC' SOCK Q36 FAFE 4J6 + g4 4,0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE CF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS S DRAINAGE PROJECT A 200 STRUCTURES tRb&CT NAMES° MASTER PLAN STUDY, BASIN PLANNING,, DRS109*4 PE22MITTwo E DESCRIPTION: MASTER PLANNING FOR BASIN IDENTIFICATION V FUTURE " 114PROVEMENTS ; PROJECT LOCATION: N.A. (N) (Planning District Name) I RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY } DIYISIOH ',ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES _. ".'Unit cf MeasureAi E:=�'TfttfftV ANDS +'1988-94 DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT Total Deficiency:' 28.68� -'- ! GANIZATION: Size of This Projects. �1 444. i P FINANCIAL: SUMMARY , ($ IN THOUSANDS) • "' �'� • Pre- Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 404 404 `' ,✓ " 1988-89 Forecast 5989-90=' S00 S00 "r Budget Year 1990 91 270 270 270 270 ITO�42_93 Future"" •` %. rr Total 1444 1444 `4 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE- OF. First Year of Impact FACILITY Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ Le"ss User:Revonuo - Net'°impact ; t (YEARS), , �, �, •� r, 10ax.- 03f ►-A3.7. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring, 1989) .w RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISIONt�ENVIRO R w CES ' TYPE.OF PUBLIC FACILITY: _DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES SERVICE 1 , , j• A AREAr .-County-wide _y11 or Planning District--- or Spec2al.AjW-& Xi 'y.. �Al . .. ij•.. a.J . �•X I•`.. Y if � /� 4 1988-94 DEFICIENCY: 28,689 $ IN THO" USJ11' D y `�" ` F, (quant ty-j_'-' N f lun too1. most uz?JTs ec} ro ect ���Si�z��e� o_fT�� F Cuinulat vs project Name ��a�..ass.S� ct , r. , ..... _...:+ . 01-H Lelyk Canal with Spreader JA_. W.tivx 5 3,240 �` Y__ 918 01-C �Lel ' 'Canal Branches �i j ;1-D � Lelyj.Canal Structures ------� --'270` LelylCanal Extension 540 C_}; 6,41 202 F Lely i Manor Canal 594 •0 'Loly Manor Extension "t' 4 "216 20 H Rock.Creek Canal 324 • i '7i,S4 5 1 I Naples Manor Outlet; { 540 S U48 p a xt"Y j � AGJ. �•, . w .�•I�y i-J US 41 Harrow Canal 432 01-KLake,lKelly Outlet 324 i u :ti 8,.842 201 L US 41 Storm Sewer 540 9 3� 3 ��KM tching. Post- Outlet- Canal- --- -216 "'"'""`' J;59. -'' ._..lialdiman_ Creek Dredging ------------- �432 �, . ": zzcu3 s'i 3ITE,s::i'i�J c>74'"� i!O .OAT :"POD 4zo�ze sue:;trr +i -,.f1..;V:Wq"leaf. a4aoi a. A.. 4} � r•yw""s i � �e'f� ? Y• 4 �>. tJ ••ill' goof ; !`. . I a• -sir , � �,�. ��,, °MJ 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT rl-rstCIE Update (Spring 1959) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS & DRAINAGE PROJECT # 201. STRUCTURES ?R?JEC�;NAME9 DISTRICT No. 61- DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION: 4&5�ARLZSt SOUrd NAPLES (Planning District blame) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DMSION:,.EMRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of MeasliidKift�Pj )k AND 4 DEP TMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 28, 89 pe OPGANIZATION: ,size of This Pro: FINANCIAL SUMMARY IS IN THOUSANDS) Pre - 'Other .�,,'To air Construction Land Construction a.�� i6e'-89 For cast 34 3..4 089-96 '145 S I Bdd.4et Year 311 524 4760 -92,- 155 154 1531 j$4 0 9 3 67 57 848 72, 712 735 7139.1 Tdta'il IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF First Year of Impact FACILITY Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ Lost User Revenue (YEARS) Net. Impact $ AliA CAPITAL IMP QVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring, 19889) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT '•Ci "DIVISIONs ENVIRONMEN'PA►T:'•SERVICES' TYPE -OF -PUBLIC -FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES-- K iC SERVICE AREA:--.County-wide or Planning District or Special Area'-X ` 1'188 9d..;DEF2CIENCY: 28.689 2$-IN,-THOUSANDS",-r (quantity) (unit of measurement) ,Size of Pro ect Name 202-13 Cocohatchee Canal Structure .A.Z ;f .;' 'l ^ 216 10,246 Cocohatchee Canal with Structurdrs— .2;430 y,, 12,676,y � F AT ':'rd,o �:.^.@i1 ! 110 e::L tV,,Db ".�l "`' 202-D- --951- Canal -- -' — 648- — - 137324- 02 E 4 Pala River Structure j 0* 13,324 Project to be funded by the Big;Cypress Basin 2: i is �,ti.i r 77. ?: .' s':1�'L'CT�3^'3*0,.Qfit.1., y t li.i�. .vt � ..�..._ _ _.•_ �.ila �G� '���yY ,."i-Y"II.� _�,,m .. F71.Il K'iV iw�.4131Y rMkt• �fi ...___•--_ ...��.-r...__.-. .. __...� _ fir. ;> jon r r t 600K UJ�PAGE - -7" ti' CAPITAL IAIPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS VOR STRUCTURES PROJECT A 202 PROJECT. NAME s : COCOHATCHEE RIVER CANAL ^ . : • ; ,,:t., : T�•r,,;';'.ggri DESCRIPTION: . CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS.. PROJECT LOCATION: 10 NORTH NAPLESS URBAN ESTATES - W (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:.ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurementr;S IN THOUSANDS DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 28,689� Size of This Projects 3,294 FORGOAXIZATION: S,t,' FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS)),_. TEA, S i Pre- Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior .._ _ ... R'uF.4 H-�G 1988-89 41 5 4 Forecast-';. 1989-90 ~� Budget Year 1�990, 91 167 162 1839 2168 1991 92 87 54 939 1080 1992 93 1993-94 Future - 295 216 2778 5 3294 Total "IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL . '; .. First Year of Impact LIFE OF FACILITY: Cost" per Unit t r°4r t, >< Mimber- of Units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue - (YEp,RS) Net Impact $ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring, 1989) ' RECONCILIATI(ti OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY WATER ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT DIVISION: �WlR CES TYPE_OF_PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR _STRVCTURES.._.__...... — SERVZCE County -wide j or Planninq. District or-,Special..Area- X " (X) (*) �:_xE:Fi 1�aT,'.Hc3�?2� -X) f988 94:MFICIENCY: 28 689- •- -•<.;u SN-THOUSANDSl�+ �-- (quant ty ( unit of measurement ro ect .:��,�_ ... Size of !0#' , Ciiintll iv ', '' umber' Proiect Name This Proieci Tota River Extenson 2,592 203 Gordi 15,9 6 .on l - t?�..�i,r;L...... .. _ . .. _ 7,iz f r a. rLy y i .. "��I• �V�(YM.M 'fit �T'r +� p'R:• 4 i 4'it [t•j��y,� M i A-1Zz�__. KIT„F._ •: '•� _ ., _ O 41 T. W. ..N Y Y r T .. .. � y ����. .. ✓Nt. ����n �:J'Pw Sir G$ii1W �� �C ''1 yhype/` r � :•. �' -pte ���/'j�c EGOK 036 PA5E4 r . '✓.a `y r Al r ,N i-'•. .< r Y1. � v CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM `! TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS &/OR STRUCTURES PROCT # 203: _._ JE - z PhdJECT NAME: GORDON RIVER EXTENSION - '. `. •�.1 • ; :;.'ri ::: :: a_+ DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS._ - - 4, PROJECT LOCATION: 10 NORTH NAPLESS CENTRAL NAPLES M (Planning District Name) '. } RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY c., �r DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES' Unitof MeagUremen2'HOUS ANDS* DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT .�--- -•.__ _ 1988-94 Total Deficiency:..28 689 x, ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project:592 ,s FINANCIAL' SUMMARY ' (; IN THOUSANDS) t Pre- - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total; Prior 1988-89 r Forecast Budget Year t 1990-91 1991-92 66 130 220.; 5 : 1992-93 r� 44 86 2046 r21? �f-7 w. 1993-94 Total 110 216 2266 2592 •',y IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS t ESTIMATED USEFUL. First Year of Impact LIFE- OF ;. " a, Cost per Unit $ FACILITY Number of Units Gross Cost S Less User Revenue - _., ' Net Impact ; (YEARS) ry Y��• ;CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'ELEMENT ,First CIE. Update-(Spr nq,:.,1989) -RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCX �- DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES' ' 2�Y 1.6t PUHLIC.FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES ' SERVICE- _ AREA: County -wide or Planninq�District or Specitl•Area? 7C' (X) t) (X) yl-VITUDOPICIENCY: 28,689 IN THOUSANDS j~ . (quantity • " -' (unit, cf, measurement Size -of letiv a " t �cProlect Name- ;'c; :a.^.m .�A2 � .f�Th s Fro�ec Total Land Acquisition 5,a00T 28,689 srar!j0 �ay bnzj fQl:t-l'SfAifov /+7 f i J2L4'J$Yb� r rX xs�Y lepbug r4 , eel ail ie;-wovet s- 811 a 40 :ill.? j p Y;r.r �,�.: :-:nT la xnet ju _... _ 4+ 5. •.. � _ _ � . _ '. � � f1 U 3 0 7.HrittusMl , . xeeu 4 ]IT r Q! t t ew OO&A-E CAPITAL:IMPLOVEMENT First CIE Update (Spring:1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS VOR STRUCTURES PROJECT # 204 PROJECT NAME: OTHER PROJECTS DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION: 1.3 5 7 8 NORTH NAPLES; GOLDEN GATES SOUTH NAPLES; ROYAL FAKA-PALMI RURAL ESTATES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $ IN THOUSANDS WATER MANAGEMENT -'" 198 B-94 Total Deficiency:': 28,689 ORGANIZATION: SiZO Of This Project:- -7� FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($_:IN THOUSANDS) Pre- year Construction Land I.Construction ;A b:-, J*. Other Total pior ?9 "fai - 8 9 268 19 275 14,.' 576,�_ Forecast', 9E 9 6 t y Year 150 ISO #9 '9 1 186 4 619 198 270 21 771 1991-92 78 lie 822 lx 1018 1992-93 32 31 315 378';':0' 32 31 315 Tofate_, I/ 1 275 121 3989 2 8 4':;, 7 7 3 ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED'USEFUL ,%JMPACT •LIFE IP tat 'Year of Impact FACILITY"r Cos 1per Unit $ Numbir of Units Gross Cost $ '.Lexs:User Revenue JNet,'Impact (Fears) rA1�4r'V' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMF�IT s , � _....._...._...:w,,.... j" First CIE Update (Spring 1989) "` �` '�� _. PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS &/OR STRUCTURES PROJECT 9 205 PROJECT NAME: LAND ACQUISITION &ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS "y V DESCRIPTION: INDIRECT LAND PURCHASE REQUIREMENTS G ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PROJECT, LOCATION: "t l N (Planning District Name fi RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of'Measurezaeati`S' THOUSANDS "max DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 28 A89 ORGANIZATION: Size of This Projects, 5.000 4 FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) ,M1 ' ` Pre- #: Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Y Prior 100 900 1000 .ar i988-89 Forecast 4 ,b - Budget Year �091 200 800 1 9 921z 100 900 1992-93 100 900 1000' 1993-94~ 100 900 1000 . i re Q r _ Total 600 4400 5000 *21F PACT ONFUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL-',LIFEYear ^of Impact FACILITY "' Cost.per Unit ; Number of Units Gross Cost $ LessUser Revenue - ! YEARS. Net) -Impact $ r6 S PAGE �. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring, 1989) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY � P DEPARTMENT: Emergency Medical Services DIVISION: Emorgency•Services A-": TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMSMr Substation` �`. tt:)3r 1 • S f {sad County -wide X or Planning Dis`tr" icy" � or Specia"r rhea ,: 198$ 94 DEFICIENCY: 3.0 ATS V it quant ty �sEx un t'a (measurement ro ect Size of :: ��-Cuimilatfw� c,z x Protect Name c,Y Th s� Pra�ect� , ota ' Sout-Tam3ami A• 3y : � -- .. ..- YO',z•�i4 .�1QT3' �+9`2.:R�t "H`� Zf Golden Gate ;Parkway i Airport 1 r Road 3; _L.=,W� . r;,Ji.xv.sd .r.0I4.XV1u s. '(2nd Unit) THIM ow Y.': x'J.'Ra I �LFiCtAC1 Iy/.►+-.�........ • .......... ... ._. - y ,�♦�y y`+rp.:...�.r.1wtrw.�y+.....y.•.. �'!y"`�.�,�yy,"�yW +;1 3I /!!1i"4:1U4 alAi�4+ii.i. 7`. t`MnoZ 'y 'M ,. r • '.sK. r Ww.•rk . S?1UTUA MO BOOK 036 ry t 447 jj11 tva I • . i L - .l Am W M11' - % ')V'1qNT VtT, 1A.) CAPITAL -IMPRMM= ;&E % First CIE Update '(Spring,1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORS PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS Substation- PROJECTV"i01'_' rDESCTYPN'Or _C OJF PROJECT NAME: South Tamiami. Trail-(Lely) E RIPTION:. EMS Substation and Vehicle - PROJECT LOCATION: 2 Urban M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY SMSION: Emergency Services i Unit of Measurement: ALS Unit" DEPARTMENT: Emergency Medical j 1988-94 Total Deficiencys 3— Services ORGANIZATION: i Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY, IN THOUSANDS) r*dOT yoar—__l Pro- .,-,construction iAnd_ _Construction Other - ____Tota C' Prior forecas 1989-90 3.1 75 151.3 96 5 325,9: Budget Year - 1990-91yr 19§1" 92 93-94 9 993 Total-- 3.1 75 - _1 3'2h5 IMPACT. -ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED V_SEFU1 L First Year of Impact 89/90 ZLITY �,FAC o Cost per Unit $ 203 , 300 1 -7 $ - to 'wjm'. v. 'J' V;m�pr. -of Units 1 Gross':Cosi') $ 203 30 is Less User Revenue - 141,200 _ (years) S 62.100 $ W-2 goof U36PA6Cf4 I�►: W. .. ... i � Y f i,� � zh♦ fH ����^iC l." CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE U ate•.(Spring 1989) PROJECT -SUMMARY FORM*.-, ! ;+ TYPE-4F'PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS Substation ~------ - -- PROJ£CT-9-302 p, PROJECT NAME: Golden Gate Parkway/Airport- Road.-.--- DESCRIPTION:EMS ' Substation and Vehicle---- ,* -- - - --- -- -, 3'. ' PROJECT'LOCATION: 3 Community Commercial Node - - -- - K ( #) (Planning District - Name) " . ••, _ _ r „? ~ IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY -- -- —�� "` RESPONSIBLE AGENCY `�•'" 1 DIVISION: Emergency Services Unit of Measurements ALS Unit' ..:,{ •�a.i•.YFS 'L_:r!'itr7ry� :�SU.1.x�itl DEPARTMENTS Emergency Medical 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 3 'Services la�ib�it tansPx-:ra3 Zt.3r�.�iASi �t zor 1v:oa ORGANIZATION: Size of This Projects 1 �+-------- w ~ - FINANCIAL, SUMMARY --($ IN• TFi3USANDS) -_.r _, _ Pre- s�� Construction Land 'Construction Other, Total Prior • .. ;. _ . _ I 1988-89 Forecast # .. r r".�i'1�3G►9:i' 989 90 B! d6et Year i r, - "{ 1 t) .r of r, 1 0'91 3.1 175 151.3 9 i.5 325.9 ,' s x r e z a;.• s Ur Tctel"-"� _.�. 3.1 75 151 3 -96wS--„-�326 �. , ' ACT -ON -FUTURE, OPERATING BUDGETS-~ ES*MATED-iTS CiTAMi? .w "itJ, ; '6LIF8fPi'DE ' rt +, ti '";7• FACILITY V FirsEr�iear =of Impact 90/91 � Cos�%'per:Unit i $ 293.700 $ 3a za'' �aiI1i Number of Units _1` C liRU ;x% oagp Gross Cost. • $ 293,700 _$ AFsdtiYtt 3Q ' r Less_User_Revenue - 4-1.200 .L' ,ta:. (years :aoxc7 i- Net impact > t 152,500 S 40oK-t13ur�c���9 F�'�IRF"�Yf ¢ r."`�r r,,• `�:�i"^ ". ,rya s`A''� .+ _ _ - , ___.__ Jd i. eeepee. lk, - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'ELEMENT F rst CIS Updatex(Spr ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE -OF -PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS Substation---------- _ PROJECT"#-103' �r PROJECT NAMES Marco (2nd Unit) «3i�- DESCRIPTION: EMS Substation and Vehicle- PROJECT LOCATION: 6 Marco "%'Lf "''� `' -%'' " 'it) :i:YT v. AA1. y� ' ~Y (#) (Planning District Name) ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY -IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 1 4, DIVISION: Emergency Services Unit of Measurement: ALS Unit 1bEPXRTMENTz Emergency Medical 11988-94 Total Deficiency: 3 Services • ORGANIZATION: Size of This Projects 1 ' FINANCIAL SUMMARY (; IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior "ram 1988-89 Forecast 89=90 Budget Year 1990=91 a. 99 92 of 1 92-93 ; 993 94 3.1 75 151.3 96.5 325:9'.�; Total : 3.1 75 151.3 96.5' " 325.9 ;. ���r�,',IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF First Year of Impact 93/94 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 293.700 6 Number of Units 1 Gross Cost $ 293,700 t 30 tlx: Less User Revenue - 141,200 - (years) Net Impact $ 152,500 t ,. i 60 636 pmx 45a • a -s. a y CAPITAL';IMPROVEMENT.,ELEMENT First CIE..Update.(Spr ng, 1989) " RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS -'TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY VP DEPARTMENT: SHERIFF'S OFFICE DIVISIONt ',Atf 7 ?C,2'? �TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY JAIL-.-•t: " : 1r,i'rF, )OI 7TD3LOSiq� SERVICE_____.. AREA: County -wide X : or Planning District ar',S dCi411l1�e� . `.. W M X ' 1988-94 DEFICIENCY: 20 BEDS of,measurement) ! 4 ro ect Size of Cumin tive, x Number.__ Protect Name This Protect 00 _._Collier County-Jail/Administration --210-Beds 2 0 7t,sY y �g1Y4' 5 k S� I.I F 7A� W, b r tr AlY6J}( � 1 at� � Q lC �et. rr <` ,Yp i LL^E2�i 'Y'3A4Idx TJr'p i�CUB .E�iQi:fir: , r _ _:s:a7U.� i?O �`F�•f7Z Q i59Y `-4 it 4 doo+i' WC) 451 . t �s Fit -' � .+. ��, '. g 7717 . G �•tY!.:i a'f. � • E � ry `nF", i w ,e CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -ELEMENT First CIE.Up a_tor Spr nq 1989) ' PROJECT SUMMARY'FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: JAIL, ADMIN.-SPACE PROJECT 400 PROJECT -NAMES COLLIER.COUNTY JAIL DESCRIPTION: 210 ADDITIONAL BEDS#,.2_1000 SQ.FT. ADMINISTRATIV$,SPACEu� PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES T s' a:,:=, 1 (Planning D., strict. Name) L!" RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY + 4 DIjIISZON ia.COUNTY MANAGER ,: Unit..of Measurement: BEDS " _, D P�►RTMENT:�OFFICE OF CAPITAL 1988-94 Total Def3c oncyi PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGAPIZATION' '� Size of This Project: 210 a +""`r' �, :� FINANCIAL SUMMARY (; IN THOUSANDS) �x rat, t t Pre- Y Year Construction Land Construction Othei Total Mit89 . 125 "Forecast 125 989,-90 L 199 ,i 6668; 5560 7427 z Bad�get Year . , °;.� J n.... �.�c. ns .b eye q 1 '1 190 1979 40" {2209 1Olt 991-92: 1992 93 F�iture r Total• 514 8647 600`":.97617 1=z y `;;IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL.:,*; ' w _ LIFE OF •.• First Year of Impact _ 90/91 FACILITY' t" Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 100 Less User Revenue - (years) Net Impact $ y � t no BOOK:4VVP�4t��N"r r � T 4 ° <' ' CAPITAL IMPR'ELEMENT +k First CIE, Update ; (spring, 1989) .... . ..... 7. RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO. 1988-94 DEFICIENCY —•ram•---- .. _--- ... - - 4: fP. ci DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY DIVISION: PUBLIC SECE�x':�r �:. TM 'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY^ SERVICE AREA: Count, -wide x or Planning'District or Special Area xr $ 1988-94 DEFICIENCY: 41 676' SO. FT (quantity), " ( unit -of -measurements= i' cct - ; s3iaa�g!ciile�ve umber Protect Name T'4v.-`'`.r� ` '� T�� Tota Pro ect X�'RS?�Si 0510- QO`: headquarters Addition___ ; 26-,575 zr ,,Branch!ar iuiJw i,I�Y'.fttl? 6~600 3' ° '33 17 East Naples C llier North Branch. arco T`sland branch_-`j_ ._._.�._-3 30Q." jK Headquarters Library Renovation 05,'' Immokalee Branch Library Addition Q63 Goiden Gate Branch Library Addition i k6ts n. A OOa r• J��R'1' toot U36 453 s1 r Hy , ��.`• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -ELEMENT ` First CIE.0 ate.:(Spr ng 1989) PROJECT -SUMMARY FORM ►� TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARY PROJECT 1 500 i PROJECT NAME:_HEADQUARTERS LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: 26,575 SQ.FT. ADDITION AT 650 CENTRAL AVENUE,'NAPLES, ! FLORIDA 33940 PROJECT LOCATION: 13 NAPLES lN) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY I 4, DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements'"- SO' FT. � y DI AR'TMENTILIBRARY 11988-94 Total Deficitincyt``'41'`676 ORGANIZATION:,HQ AND ADMIN. Size-,of.This.,Project:.,,.,- 26,575,, FINANCIAL.SVMMARY, (;. IN THOUSANDSj' `�.�.`.._._.__� . _. .... Pre- r' Year.. Construction Land Construction Other Total! Prior - t 199E-89 115 . roiecasti $eILt 1989-90 125 i 2335 Bt)dQet }ear 9 lot 91 30 i 625 jeA'6, i 1991=92 i993-94 ► turs', r` 270 _..... �. _ 2335 7 "" t25 ''' 25 ji;""'";MPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMAUS ,„ Ffrst,,,Year'of impact 91/92 F MFTY, ni cost -,Per' Vt ; _ J4 Sh Number of Units' Gross. Cost $ 191,300 50 } hiss.:Vser Revenue - 40,000 (years)` S Niejmpact $ 151,300 Ni boob PAGi ' K r ::: -. -•"` , ,n .r�¢, t�}.R` .fit. ,f. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r TYPE'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: BRANCH LIBRARY.„ PROJECT_301 r ,.. PROJECT NAME: EAST NAPLES BRANCH LIBRARY __._... . DESCRIPTION: 6,000 SQ.FT. BRANCH LIBRARY TO BE CONSTRUCTED ,UPON,;, 0 ' ` PROPERTY HELD BY COLLIER COUNTY , FOR THAT. PURPOSE' ' ;' ,.:"' PR63ECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (T) (Planning District Name) 1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY hlPACT ON DEFICIENCY. ., DMSION: PUBLIC SERVICES j Unit ofMeasurement: SO.FT... 1 DE ARTMENT:-LIBRARY 1988-94 Total Dcficiency=" 6 ! &06-;rl ZATIONsV"'EAST NAPLES BRANCH S128 oeThA PASA it .MqO• t $Y• s.m . FINANCIAL-SUMMARY-fs,IN THOUSANDS 94F j `�� _Construction Pre- Land'—v f ' Construction" 'got or Tory% 1! Prior 45 DONATED 290'`33S' 1988-89 3 Forecast} 270 82 1E572355 WE 0 Budget Year i �a f, iPihti � 199� 91 `� to •ti�Qt �_ 1=92` 1992 k_ _ 56082 fg'0 olYMPACT. ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS' ESMA'I'W'S ZIFE, OE + F rst Year of Impact 89/90 Cost. per Unit ; Number;of Units ! 1snU _20 :•,dmuY2 Gross :Cost; ; 11,000- Less. user revenue 252BRARY;.'F� rs) Net-2mpact $ 11,000--- = - - ^F ,,� 1URPbSES Y R r 6 F 00K "Wes �h 3 t4lY 1^ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENZ ELEMENT a First CIE Update -,:(Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ,l TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT A 502 PROJECT NAME: COLLIER NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION f,'•; ;,t , "".::; '1 DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO BRANCH LIBRARY a PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (9) (Plann nq Distr ct,Name s) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY• DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurementuyv-1 S :FT:Y DP TMENTt:LIBRARY �,:: " 1988-94 Total •Deficiency 4 " 6 ORGANIZATION: COLLIER NORTH BRANCH . Size of,.This Projects: '.1,:500, E '" FINANCIAL,'SUMMARY:A VIN THOUSANDS) Pre- ! f Year Construction Land— Construction. Other Tot& y, �988�89 y fFt Bun! Forecasi ` xs rvxa 1489-90 CC Buddit': ear 91 I1 t�ai'i 9 -92 C ; 170 C<. S�9 =93 t�tset 1993-94 An-{Cd urly re- gtai 11 I ! 170 5 `1206,'T f `�. rIPACT ;ON. FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ". ESTZMATEIIiUSE t, { LIFE OF,<'� UZ F r"it ypariof Impact 92/93 ;T 1FACILZTY'3`'s �k , Cost`eper Unit ' ......_.... _ ai;��; xryc 'cti r; ; Number of Units' •, �,; ' Gross:Cost $ 2,000 50 ,. La ZX-7Uaer)Revenue - ,r.(YEARS).7o'; tt(e�t, �iipact ' j $ 2,000 1 &gral �9q SOCK 036 Phu 456 g :: ..�: � �+� ,� ;•�z ,: .,.stir, First Ci Up at• Spr nQ 9) PROJECT'SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT # 503 PROJECT NAMEt MARCO ISLAND BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 6 MARCO (N) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY.,- b1VISIONi-PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measttzemeata "= S 'T:� G MARTKENT21LIBRARY ' 1988-94 Total'befieAnd# • i$i�`67 *' ` t ORGANIZATION: MARCO ISLAND BRANCH 0O i FINANCIAL SUMMARY'`WIN THOUSANDS) Pre- ! I Year;I Construction Land 'j Construction • %.Other Toti Prior 1988-89 F recas 9.90 Butdget ear r; 92 1 23 f 290 0 99 23 ' 290 40 T�tdi'- z 531 #' FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED�VSEFUt, ; *ZIMPACT:ON iU s?7.r: LIFE OF FirstWear:of Impact 92/93 'FACILITY°"J` Cost per Unit $ Number . of Units Q 5CCo3t'° ; S Lese <Vser 3,000 . evenue k Net Impact 3 3,000 7 r r: }� r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT F rst CIE UpdateASprinq .1989 ) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT 504 r: PROJECT NAME HQ LIBRARY RENOVATION +- DESCRIPTION: 1 .. PRAJECr-LOCATIONt APLES (Planning District Naae x RESPONSIBLE AGENCYIMPACT ON DEFICIENCY _ DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements, DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY 1988-94 Total Deficyiency ORGANIZATION: HQ AND ADMIN. i Size of This Projectk ��. ,,.., S 7'rt, (' W [a 4 rr,:�.-' ,;::i�t h41r «rY` 11 . ,i 1i{; .r, a ; ,.+♦ Y � +'X!."y�, `y.. FINANCIAL— SUrQ4ARY"f;_;IN- THOUSANDS) """""�) ,._ _... Pre- _ __ _ �. �• t _ _: "x Yoar- Construction Land Constriction Other Tota Prior Forecas 9 l0 Budget Year _81' 1990 9i. 343 Y 1 92 93 1 fi77 ff n Total---�-•---- __ r. � 343 - -� * �t �3 : . .a MP71CT-ON-FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS."'' " `•C�'i�aS c� 1 t,^�' .�," ..�t: .'S?�'3^ a-rir� 'LYFE` L�' `'� FirstrYeaf-of Impact N/A FACILITY r Cost:par Unit Number of Units i Gross Cost i $ Z=.xcCtxiui4 Less User Revenue �* Net tImpact $ fY �j, 7 � •W 'I Y eeoc _Q36 WR5 r r lfr CAPITAL IMPR ,OVIIKENT' ELEMENT -, First CIE Update (Spr ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE_OF. PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY __.., _ PROJECT $-505 y. PROJECT -NAME: IMMOKALEE BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: • PROJECT LOCATIONt 10 IMMOKALEZ-r,; -(Planning ..D str ct.Name) w, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 11 �►��' ,,•, - • -, „•.._ . . _ ci'J � c;.:)7.VSi:i2 3IJQUq-`sP,QLBxV'�tt : � D2YZsI0tfi� PUBLIC SERVICES , Unit of Measurementt �ARTMENT LIBRARY ' Ci r 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 41 64 ORGANZZATIO _ $i :•vrJ':ih5i'NJ�aFtb •"� Ni"ZMMOKALEE BRANCH Size of�This Profect: 000 .._ ,_-.. ....__a__...._...._.._.....__.....-�..-w"•r". +r+...—»ter .—_._..r._. •�i FINANCIAL SUMMARY.. ( $ IN THOUSANDS) _.. • -. __ __ _._j 9' ..Pro - Prior Construction Land . Construction- �4 ' a ,Fyot�recas I i r" ,'° tS�' , 1989-90 r,c-FB�i Budget Year i i xb` ' s;►Pk�uA '7' • 91 d� i . 1 • � 1 m � �� , 'af 92 •93 13 99J-94 3 170 1 � r 0 203. e � _ • . � _ _ _ ' � ,yes ,x'�`riMPA'CT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFiJJ 'L .. .. Firat"Yeat of Impact _ 94/95 Cost per Unit i $ .. .FACILITY;aQA Numbar,,of Units Gross:Cost-- $ 31.400 Less•User` Revenue (YEARS) ay 4h. aook� {U3610 t 4591 1'ks : yet F CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT' ELEMENT F rst CIEU ate. Spr ng,1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT # 506 r PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION j DESCRIPTION: %? f; PAOJECT_LOCATION: 3 GOLDEN GATE"; 70 ZWT_' . M (Planning District Name RESPONSIBLE AGENCY -IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY;•.r.c DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements SO.FT. t MENT:.LIBRARY .:-1988-94 Total Deficiency: 41 676! ZATION: GOLDEN GATE BRANCH Size of.This Projects 2.000 .)* w FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) �# Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior I8$•=89 Forecast 989 `90 Bridget ;Year z �11r.,,f rat x,. .m .•t Y. f ; t 7i 73 13 13 x� 3 170 ; 30 203 `x Tcta16 170 30 �0216 �V,, ,IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL M� LIFB OF First Year of Impact 95/96 FACILITY, Cos . per Unit $ , Number of Units ` Gross ".Cost $ 31.400 50 Less User Revenue - (yg)', Net Impact $ 31,400 } a loot CAPITAL TMROVEMENT'ELEMMT First CIE Update (Springi..1989) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY v 'd DEPXRTMENTs LIBRARY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES ----I TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARY BOOKS-, 'AREA: County -wide or Planning District or Special, Area MX T-2 M#--,0469kfCIENCY: 41.658 BOOKS (quantity) (unit','Of1meas COX size of cumulative Name 12ta -Library.-Book Collection 68- 175 , or .3say AL,rb 10 Ee» Pe -tees fb1UT7%'� `iJT1JfT i.0 TD ..Agril - •�°5p a 10 :Xissy le'l J � ? 3 :r n S r: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update , (Spr ng, 1989) . }a'+. PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r RPE_OF PUo'GIC FACILITY: LIBRARY BOOK STOCK PROJECT # 550 PROJECT NAME: LIBRARY BOOKS `. DESCRIPTION: BUDGET FOR LIBRARY BOOKS *ROJECT LOCATION: COUNTY -WIDE #) (Planning District Name) ` &ES 6kIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 1 sIONs PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of,'Measurementi• BOOK"' " I EPARTMENT: LIBRARY 1988-94_Total Deficiency::_ 41,658 41, OR13XN1LATION: HQ AND ADMIN. Size of This Project: 41 U • C i' FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) ''' x '5 Pre - Yea Construction Land Construction Other. Total,,; varies `rf} i9 .29 r Par.13f7 s+ ,H 247U8 J 261C0 . D 8vd t;.Yearpirlibl! 'a so. 91. 213 213 f �92 `:: ,: ' 213 275 99 93 ... _ , n , :,x y�75`° G 275 194.1 .. 299 299 yA. { TOb l s I570 ' h".'J570 �lSPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF lioear of Impact FACILITY Cot`•par'Unit` $ Ntmtber; of Units Goss,. Cost ;.. $ varies misk.User Revenue - (YEARS) NetImpact $ t, °- aaox 036 462 f � _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Updata . Spr nq,_ 9989) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY r 6, . DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION: COUNT7ffFSANAGEEt' MANAGEMENT i TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS E {� SERVICE AREA: County -wide X or Planning District or Special.Area (X, annng (i' -iX .-. 988-94 ,DEFICIENCY: 183zz 8 s .�S�U�J�FF... (quantity tunit of measurement u "f3iA+WIJ :TV 'T'RAgr- "R ro ct; Size.af.t`� 9N +Cumulativea0 umber=-�ZG Protect Name_ This Pro ect Total �" ew�Courthouse 69,000 69,000 ew HialEh Building Sxcxr Building B Renovation _ r. n-6..3��_I*�' ?' •; B ilding`W Expansion 15,000 1340�8 4« S N� Agriculture center 12,000 146 701 Development Services Building � 40,000 1867p00��X .08 Building C-2 Expansion 2,300 i88, 00' UE �i. "e-iieei P "+► Does.not add new Square Footage i �s, ! s•e—Eeef oxy� 1I ',! JTUI HO 'Jf4 iMI ' 100K UJU PAGE J_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT -Tng 1989) First CIE Update (Spr rnr�_-FTYPE PROJECT SUMMARY FORM i OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT I �Flr I 600 PROJECT NAME: NEW COURTHOUSE -�7-DESCRIPTION: mt A W r COURTROOMS AND RELATED FACILITIES .:, PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (Planning District Na -4- RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY, DIVISIONt COUNTY MANAGER Unit of .Measurement:, S FT. DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL 1988-94 Total Deficiency 187,384 �24 01" PROJECTS MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project:.,,,_,. 69 001* Additional 69,000 iqefinished f sift j. a . included in project FINANCIAL SUMKARY,($'IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year construction Land Construction Other Total Prior - 1988-89l 281 11179r, k0geast Jn no'. , -Jol 4040 4040 bUaget Year 0E- to y Jo, 5,9i-92 1992-93 19ii-'94 Nitur, a 281 I15219--7- IMPACT -ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Firxt:Yeak.of Impact 90/91 FACILITY Cost'per-Unit 2.32 Number of Units 69 ' 000. j, Gross Cost $ 160,080 Less User. Revenue Not :Impact',, $ 160,080 -AtA B00% 036PA,fir 464 5 is,�, I ' "' " ;,� , : , � 4 ,4 , 1pe P. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (SprIng 1989) PROJECT SUMAR-y FORM f TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT # 601 PROJECT NAME: NEW HEALTH DEPARTMENT BUILDING DESCRIPTION: CLINIC AND OFFICE SPACE FOR HRS, PSD PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST ITAPLES (Planning District Na RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ;I,Vr,sroN: COUNTY MANAGER Unit of Measureme'ntt SOFT. DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL 1988-94 Total Difi6iiniijiAi 164 PROJECTS MANAGEMENT 1Ir' 01ftZATION 0 fit Size of This Projecti 0 0 N e Wtf� Additional 25,000 sq.ft.unf n s ed included in.project--,..-.--.., FINANCIAL THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land construction Other- --26tal, Prior i9W89 128 8899 4 5 90. 321 Forecast -90 "at, 828 , it' i io add Yi W9 ar 0�-- 9 1 , #0 2 9 , F 0i 9 4 128 9727 5 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL' First ear of impact 90/91" LIFE, FAC%t;IT?,- Cost per Unit $ 2.32 Number of Units 50,000 Gross Cost-.", $ 116,000 Less User Revenue Nqt_lmpact_...,-. $ 116,000 100K 036PAGE 465 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT � First CIE, Update (Spring:1989) PRWECx SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT # 602 PROJECT NAMEt BUILDING A RENOVATIONS DESCRIPTIONt REMODEL AND REFURBISH BUILDING A FOLLOWING COURT Inpe PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (i) (Planning District.Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY "C"C' DIVISION: COUNTY MANAGER Unit of Measurement DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL 1988-94 Total De De ciency: PROJECTS MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATION: Size of This roject: FINANCIAL stwm (.$,/Zfi THOUSOS) Pre - Year Construction Land n3o%)ict n other TotaL Forecast, ti 1989-90 1174 906 2160, Budget Year 1991-92 eel �7!93 199 of -Units 6PERATING BUDGETS ESTIkATED -USZrM- LT =:)Or.,-, 3 N/A FACILITY $ $ so (years): $ .0 toot I 11-w Am., rwra' ; ,F.4°9i,�(f1`t;7 µ+ _1 . •�vv !l I CAPITAL IMPR E�EIKENT "First CIE ate. Spr ng 19a9) s PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF.PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS .._ PROJECT 1, ,603, + PROJECT NAME: BUILDING B RENOVATION' DESCRIPTION: THIS RENOVATED STRUCTURE TO HOUSE BOARDROOM AND MINUTES RECORDS i PROJECT•LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES• I _ _ (tI (Plane ng D strict Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY D2VIS�2GNi COUNTY MANAGER D�.P�R�i'MENT: OFFICE Unitiof Measuremeriti) :TV12rVAA1iaQ1 OF CAPITAL I988=$4 Total Deficiency: y` PROJECTS MANAGEMENT. �.._ t y. GAFTZATION:y size.. Of- -This - Proj a ,.... sr. �y= FINANCIAL SUMMARY (f IN THOUSANDS) r'. ils�ai Pre— Construction hand Construction Oter ' '1'o't'a •�, Prior 1988-89 forecast Budget YBar 90-91 91' 92 { 30 �; + ' I 15 526 to i 1992-93 f 94 f` Future + _ .. _ . .._.. .�.• ...... 45 .'�IMPACT,OW FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMA i ? ..�. YT .. t T:WvS First Year of Impact it/A LIFER bid; Cost per Unit ; ._. _ FaCILITt JZC) J `SCi" FJ Number ofcUnits __. _...._ j CTO-1 .Cosh. s �.:r.� Ies� half Less User Revenue' _ ._.._. v___- �0 , Net -Impact--• ; _..(years .. ��h. ' bOOlf eta" `Yi ; - { :. �t. i 1. �•.C` .f-44 I S iY.II I r . i # •� •.�+... .►+MwV ,.q.... n, rt:-.wpg p.:,L�• 'I'^�„„!•'�� `k, :'b l .. •'T. 7 CAPITAL IMPRMR= CEMENT wx '(1 t CIE Update Spring 989) PROJECT 'SUMMARY FORM 4_OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT # 604 PROJECT NAMEt BUILDING W EXPANSION DESCRIPTION::. 15',000 S9.FT WAREHOUSE ADDITION INCLUDING"DAY CAkh"'' FACILITY PROJECT 'LOCATION s 4 EAST NAPLES ... . .... (Planning.District Name) RESPONSIBLE_ AGENCY -IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ,DIVISION: COUNTY.MANAGER !Unit of Measurement; so l�R. ,�,OFFXCE OF CAPITAL 1988-514J,,F(:�al. Deficiency$ 187384 PROJECTS MANAGEMENT ffi IZATION:. Size of This Projects 5 000 T FINAN w- 77 7., CrAV.-SUMMARYAV,IN THOUSANDS)— Pre - Construction Land, Construction Other -Total Y -1 -1'4 (A 1988-89 Forecast �89-90 �1 30 570 t..Y4 ar -41: 1970 F, 1�2.93 L 30 2540, ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS, )111TAq "U eal-54 Impact 91/92 FACILITY unit $ 2.32 Number of Units 15.000 Gross Cost $ 34,800- Lsss,Revenue to I=r ears)"- Net $ 34,800 0 V I b JL soot topiltG0,468 F CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM .._ TYPE.OF.PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT 1.605 PROJECT NAMES AGRICULTURE CENTER DESCRIPTIONS NEW STRUCTURE TO HOUSE AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND TO BE USED AS AN EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER IN TIME OF POTENTIAL DISASTER PROJECT LOCATION: TO BE DETERMINED _.._ k . (#) (Planning District Name) ;`•';� RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISibN*2- COUNTY MANAGER Unit of Measurements''' ft"PMM4ENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL 1988794 .Total Defi'ciency:' -`187`:384' PROJECTS MANAGEMENT t f j :JI^lS.. , ORGANhLATIONs . ;Size of This Pro ects T FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) + {.� Pre- Construction Land ; Construction- "Other. Prior 60 Forecast f 9-90 BudQet.Year �99Q 91 i 1991-92 } it -Ad 51% 135 C e.. effi 805 1992-93: i 4e�sees 94� ! 'AE�Ehiti , 1 �..d -._.._ 60. _..�. .. ._._.940 _ K,s.l1PACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED`USEFUL �Y :.:.'; st FirYear of Impact 91192 _ LIFE„ OF " :�FAC2�,ITj[�'yi' Cost per Unit : 2.32 7- Number of Units 12,000 Gross -Cost: $ -27,80 ; Less User Revenue Net_Smpact_..__ _ i 27,800 _ , ..1 ,r , I 1 • . 000K f���r�4s�69 >�r,a �r4 . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fist CIE Update Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT 1,605 } PROJECT NAME: AGRICULTURE CENTER DESCRIPTIONs NEW STRUCTURE TO HOUSE AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND TO BE, USED AS AN EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER IN TIME OF POTENTIAL DISASTER PROJECT LOCATION-. TO BE DETERMINED (Planning District Name) �s RESPONSIBLE AGENCY ; IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY .. DIVISION: COUNTY MANAGER Unit of Measurement: SO.FT.. DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL j 1988-94 Total Deficiency: - 187,364 • d t+.. _ PROJECTS MANAGEMENT : ? I 'A!, Z I i;l, O:IO k ORGANIZATION: I Size of This Project.:_ 12.000 G FINANCIAL `.UNII�AR)t~! I IN THOVSANDSj Year Pre - Construction Land Construction other Totals Prior 60 601 -s i S9W_89 i Z �� j:.. 8orecast i QEt��?8R t -90. 320 :a Y 3e� r,a E(tdgat�'Y4ar i E ae fleet .� 9 =1 j 620 I C 92 ! e-went 1=93 r 93 94 `' .• G77T 60 'i ACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED -us .��►,..Jis LIFt :bir First Year of impact 91/92 FACILITY[ RC. Cost per, Unit iS 2.32 Number-of•Units 12,000 Gross Bost,-' ; 27,800 Less , User Revenue IfBL'TtIIp$ 27,800 =` IOU 036 rns 470 ' f 0 at? �'�'«��• ��.��' ++�.•,1ik,Y�LtpdyA� �txj$F.�A fir'-15tjd�'',�.�1 �.1•r�ai., ri `i j. �����•'��'' F J � ct CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EL F rat CIE Update- Spr nq-1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ' TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT 9 607 PROJECT NAME: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING. DESCRIPTION: NEW STRUCTURE TO HOUSE DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES t AND OTHER COUNTY OFFICES PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES M (Planning District Name) '�L A `.: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY _ DIVISION: PUBLIC WORKS Unit of Measurement:' "SO. FT. DEPART?Mn: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total•,beficieacyi 187.384 ORGANIZATION: } Site of This Projdcti 40,000 t' FINANCIAL S UM"4ARX_ (;. IN.,THOUSANDS) � • �' .:,; .. Pre - ear -`_—i Construction Land Construction other —Total. 89 _..I 3500�" Forecast' i Audget Year � Oe•-�7�t 07791 { �► I!9 1 92 3 S e-pee-i 19 2-93 3500 asob IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS._... _.._ ESTIMATED Utt. ,gfrn LIFERp ,OFr irSE,Year;of'Impact 89/90 ` FACZ�ITY "s Cost per.Unit S 2.32 Number'of Units ' 40,000 - Gross.Cost S 92,800 - " 40 -; Less User Revenue - - (years uLvxD ' NeL•--Impact,; -' $ 92,800- BOOK 036 pr t 471 J *� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FIrst CIE Update (Spr1Rq 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT # 608 Ott 11 PROJECT NAME: BUILDING C-2 ADDITION DESCRIPTION: PROPERTY APPRAISER, COMPUTER AND ADMIN. SPACE PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Unit of Measurement: SO.FT. 15E�')iTxniTz, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficitin" 187,384 64ikZATION: Size of This Project: j,' 2,300 OF t FINANCIAD:S IN THOUSXXb. T Year,, Pre - Construction Land Construction other Total 89 24 %: 366 3S' 425 rbricast�47 f9'89-90 1992-93 1993-94 Future 24 366 -35 425 %C 4�*";�.'IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL irsitYear o' f Impact 89/90 LIFE OF,, FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 2.32 .NUmber of Units 2,300 Gross Cost $ 5,336 40 Less User Revenue (years) Net Impact $ 5.336 14 PASE472 101K Ud C.}rTR'.• r .,. .. Jam" �i'E�( W R� fr.� s RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS 20 1988-94 DEFICIENCY r _ " . PARKS AND RECF,EATIOR:LDSS 1122.DO INVENTORY VALUE/CAPITA_ - ACTUAL VALUE MIREII IN THE CIP IASEB OM INDIVIDUAL FACILITY STANDARDS Y FACILITY 1987-88 1988-89 '1984-70 1940-41 1991-12 ,. L942-43 ! 1!l3=14 TYPE INVcKTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY - INVENTORT - -INVENTORY VALUE - VALUE, YALUE VALUE VALUE. _VALLUE . VALUE POPULATI0NICO-RIDE PERRI 131,150 141,030 154,341 1b3,B4S 111,345 111,146 186,341 AKPETHEATERS $160,000 $170,000 S160,000 $170,000 $200,000 f220,000 Y q IASEIALL FIELDS 2,051,000 2,184,000 2,310,000 2,436,000 2,520,001' 21646,000'� 2,772,000. - IA5KEIBALL/VOLLEYSALL 42B,TSO 4Sb,150 .- 493,000 .. 505,750..,;.521,500 . 553,000.E 573,150 BICYCLE TRAILS SI5,241 346,Sb1 Sb3,264 384,304'�' '401,780 ` 411,176- 1 435,072 CHILDRENS PLAY6RWkDS 331,465 354,035 374,330 312,370 408,133 ,....426,143.E 444,235 ..___.. Y . COHiA1NliY CENTERS 2,489,000 3,172,000 3,355,000 3,538,000 3,460,000 " 3,143,000, 4,026,000 COMITY POOLS 480,000 540,000 540,000 600,000 600,00/ 660,000 { 660,000 FITNESS TRAILS 245,000 260,000 275,000 290,000 .300,000 .. T 3151000, 330,000 FOOTkWSOCCER FIELDS 1,104,150 1,172,400 1,240,250 1,307,90 If-W,000 �`;1�420�fiSd` 1,41/,300 +-ITMIDNI 728,000 111,000 819,000 - 910,000. 110,001 _ 1,04E,000 a 1,001,000 i0681116 TRAILS 129,360 137,280 145,200 153,120 158,400 166,320 174,240 DLTRPIC POOLS 1,251,200 1,407,600 1,401,600 1,564,000 _ _1,564,000 _1,720,400 1,720,400 PICNIC PAVILIONS 274,400 214,000 $",Do .324,100 x1,100 4800 i 36l,600 "SS RACDUEitALL CDIMTS 392,000 411,000 442,000 412,000 J414,000 501,000 i 526,006 SN9FFLEBOARO COURTS 102,l00 110,254 115,500 121,100- !127,050_.•_- 132,300 , 131,60C SOFTBALL FIELDS 1,886,500 2,021,250 2,117,500 2,233,000 2,327,250 2,423,500 i 2,541,000 TENNIS COURTS 183,750 1T5,175 206,250 217,504 226,M 2u'rA 247,504 �A7, TRACK b FIELD 10,216 172,361 172,361 111,S20 111,520 +,,;_ 210,672 f10,61: HAT RA11PS 4,128,000 4,391,3T3 4,6n,M 4,167,074 5,0113,381Ja 5,2"1703 f,5S4,04. TOTAL 117,331,759 $11,629,769 fil,486,l4S $20,681,211 121,384,21/ f22,'50196A 'f230414041: `+•; i to-0+> i PER CAPITA VALUE lJ25 1126 _ 1123 1126 1125 N E.Q.-gees h•.;e" .a .. i_ .-%�.�JJ �:::',:.,�i-z•: :TL "',!'3 iiU ;`O:.�iMi. ;:,. ' 601K' iJJU� �73 - RECONCILIATION OF. PROJECT3.1T_0♦A,,--.198_8.-94 DEFICIENCY s_ �+r.►Y.:.. FPAS An RECREATION: 'LOSS MIA( INVENTORY VALUEICAPITA ACTUAL VALUE PLANNED IN 111E CIP FACILITT I111-11 .. _ 1111-1!_._�. m-10_ _rll10-�1 ' N!i-fi "'� ltll=l3''' `}l11f3-1{ .�- TTPE INVENTORY INVENTORY .__ - INVENTORY- 1VEN1OAV .71MVEII W- .I1fVENTDRT _ �>�NVENTORY VALUE - VALUE VALUE VALUE , VALUE"'' i ' VALUE' "- r� VALUE __... -. ._..--•----•-- - sue..-.. POPULATIONICO-HIDE PERM~ 1S1,1S0 141,OS0 , .156,341 163,045 171,343'` 178,164' 196,342 ,• AMPITNEATERS S100,000 f100,000 f200,000" ` 1200,000 .,��200,000�;'f100;000' 1200000 ` r r., BASEBALL FIELDS 1,260,000 1,600,000 2,100,000 2,1401000 '' 2,140,000 [ :1,140,000 " 2,141:001:'. A i'BASKETMUIVOLLEYIALL 227,' O 227,500 227,%0 227,500 227,500 307,500 307,500 ` IICTCLF TRAILS 2,361,216 2,311,232 2,682,240 3,104,641 3,527,040 3,907,200 - 4,312,704, CKILORENS PLATSAOUNDS 213,150. 213,130 ,. 213,130 213,150. 213,131 405,900 403'"1 COMMUNIT/ CENTERS 1,220,000 1,T20,000 " 2,440,000 `'3,660,000 "`T3,660,000 '�"f{ii0_w" 4,270,00/ ri C0IDAAIITY POOLS 0, - ! 0 0 1 1 r +00,o01 M10", FITNESS TRAILS 0 " / / 100,000 2od,'0o0 '� f00,000 400,000, FOOTIALLISOCCEN FIELDS . 102,000 _.•__102,000- _ 1,121,500 1,353,000 1,571,500 1,571,500 1,5711500 r+r ti; iTI11ASIIW yr' 't t Jr lI0,000 !l01000--110,ro01" i10,004t V10,/00: - JONIN1 TRAM 3l1600 - ,boo-__ -, v in 31,601 66,000 12,400 " .111,10 ` bLYMPIC Pal 0 � 1 �" 1. _• i"'"1;�4,od0"` "t;S64;eoo f,Si4,00� y` h ftsT PICNIC PRVILJONS 28,000; 21000 21,000 2sOoo . 121,00 21,000 336,100 - RACOUETIALL COURTS 240,000' �240:000 240,000 240:000 440,000 •440,100''' 440,00 'SfA!rFL.ES W COURTS 115,500 113,500 113,500 113,500 - J15,500--136,300 ` 136,504 SOFTIAII FIELDS 2,502,500 2,502,500 2,502,500 2,302,300 2`5021500 2,502,504 2,502,504 TEI011S COURTS 410,000, 450,000 � 450,000 450,000 1450,001 450,000 150,OK [ TRACK 6 FIELD 0. 0 i" 1 1 1 8 rt+t` t+�� ill,S2' !BOAT RAMPS 1,261,034 1,261,034 1,802,620 2,163,144 2151I,661 2,A1II12` 2,111111. ` 1 TOTAL $11 001/ 300 1111 451/ 316 1151 1311 610 1111 3271 034 121 22SI $SO ` S211 `Tb6I 6l2 124,741,11 r � � ". LP-()r, PEA CAPITA VALUE 17! $77 117 1112 1124 1121 11: A E' cal .I V?T. C yrvn 2. c, Sfi �: :3:4'IEl 3RTT:'t.i I10''1,9N;2 �''x'" _.....�_ _�__ � J�7{i T9^y ttii7t4'.•1 ,t$,,,';G- rn 474 'G1i1 n 100K �36 P1,�E CAPITAL'.IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 15 First CIE Update (Spr—fn—g1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: AMPHITHEATER PROJECT 0 700 ;PROJECT NAMZt,. AMPHITHEATER DESCRIPTION: STAGE, WIRED ELECTRICAL, STORAGE PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (Planning District Name) R10�09SXBLZ AGENCY 'IMPACT'ON DEFICIENCY� i DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement:" AMPHITHEATER DEPART?2= PARKS AND RECREATION 1988-94 Total Deficien*cyt 1 I ORGANIZATION: Size of This Projedti I r ;TVX!,� FINANCIAL SUMMARY_($ IN THOUSANDS),.'-A"j. Pro- tv-4 Yeart Construction Land Construction Other, Total 89 Forecast �., i9sq-90 at 4year-, 10 80 10 100. 92 1992;,93 4. f IPuture 20 o s IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF rirst Year of Impact 90/91 FACILITY Cost.,per Unit $ Nwpk4r,'-of Units Gibas"Cost , $ —rl —00 0 20 Less User Revenue - 11000 (years) Net Impact $ 51000 500K , '036 PAQ 475 0,1 � : �� n .; CAPITAL I R EngE z First CIE ate•(Spr 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: BICYCLE TRAILS PROJECT # 701 PROJECT NAME: BICYCLE TRAILS DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT PATHS TO SCHOOLS t PARKS WHERE APPROPRIATE CONNECT BIKE TRAILS: 46.2 MILES (Funded in Roads Construction Budget) 315 PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (t) (Planning District Name) ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONt PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: MILES DE?ARTMENTs PARKS &RECREATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: _ 0 ORGANIZATION: •ADMIN. Size of; This.Projectj;- 4642 FINANCIAL SUMMARY(;:IN THOUSANDS)` Pre- t Construction Land .;se, Construction: ,Other Total. Prior 1988-89 i 3 a. Forecast! 35 38 , ,1. 9 9030�., SudQetear 0� 911-11 42 380;pF 0yat42« '� t 7 � � . 1. � _'�• �' , • 42 y�92 0; 380 's0 1A2 F 92-93 38 ! 342 9 94 40 366 k i 1 the �x:•it+d Vital` 195 1756. j ir953� A�ON';FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED iUSEFUt �} LIFE C_ 1 F rst Yedr,;of Impact N/A FACILITY - ; ! Cost, per. Unit ; - Number of Unitsa> Grosst"Cost.': r, ' c� Z.1ss'''Vser��Revenue - Net'fmpact ; r �+ Y' 600K O�U PA�c t�� • t��l ��:. ♦w ti far �Zt ". CAPITAL' IMPRbVEMEN'1'= ELEMENT 4r f First CIE U ate, Spr nQ 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT # 702 , PROJECT NAMES COMMUNITY PARK #6 DESCRIPTION: INCLUDES BALLFIELDS, COURTS, PARKING LOTS, LANDSCAPING;•+ RESTROOMS, PLAY AREAS PROJECT LOCATIONS 9 URBAN -ESTATES #) (Planning D strict Name)` "- RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurementt COMMUNITY PARK DEPARTMENT: PARKS rx RECREATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: _ 3__J QROMIZATION:'ADMINISTRATION Size of This Pro ectt r FINANCIAL'SUMMARY'(#`IN THOUSANDS) i -. Pre- Y�irT 'c Construction Land.rar. ConStruction' rOt�er Tot-4 Prior YOi�g� i '88-89 Forecast 89-40 100 768 Budget Year , p 100 9r.92 ; =y ?1 0 2,93 '3L�ah 200 768 1398 ACT'ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTfM9i16`tfS ,LIFE OF First-Yeaf• of Impact 91/92 Cost. per Unit $ �rU 10 Y9dmu% . Number of Units i _ .._.- � - 3e Rr4.=sSCost— f $ _ 131,600 Lesa4User Revenue - 12,000 _- YEARS Net Impact $ _ 119,600 .zr�L „4'� x t J�t1t J r i4f t,,. ;.y•, F� r <s CAPITAL IMPRQM= ELEMENT #t' First CIE Update Spri g1989) 4 PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PHASE II PROJECT i 703 PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY PARK PHASE II DESCRIPTION: 64 FACILITIES IN PHASE II COMMUNITY PARKS, COMMUNITY CENTERS, BASKETBALL, BASEBALL, FITNESS TRACKS ETC, PROJECT LOCATION: 11.2_ 6_4,3 IMMOKALEE. NORTH NAPLES, MARCO. O EAST NAPLES GOLDEN GATE (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIV28ZONi PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: FACILITIES '. DEPARTMENT:: PARKS AND RECREATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:� 64' 6RGANI2ATION::ADMINISTRATION ._ Size of,,This,Project: FINANCIAL -SUMMARY::($ IN THOUSANDS) 1 ' - Pre- F Xaar v Construction LandsConstruction; ther Total � Prior ; 313 j ,313; 1988-89 S00 ast 398 Forec# �898 • . , � �a a�e�ti� 70 ! 1740 60 8udget,Y ar rF ; zF -91 70:,238E , {: 60 r'i$ /� ',�'• 1 :. J`�„0 �y t'F.c � is �r� 91.92 30 ° r. 667 l 93 30 s5.4 � 514, 20 .taw .� •g4y�' ' ° 30 1018 400,$8 ,. j ;xa1 7036 730 200 sBACT;,•ON: ..FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS- .�:• ESTIMATEAcUSEFUL r. z 5.: ' LIFE' OF .. Y rst�()rpar-of Impact 90191 A. wFACILITY Cost.Per Unit ; �t Nutaber.'. of - Units I( _ .... i:.i: c q ..•.c��, G>=os's Cost 1 t 64 .800 i.64ti�1 slFiReVenu� - 60.000 020 Nat Impact' t 589.800 : - w urev_X _ I *aei t IOOKO 479 Fist . ) ,; d av • J < JT. 4 �✓. .� 1PP-c7 -' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -ELEMENT First CIE Update (spring-1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL.': PROJECT # 704" PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL j DESCRIPTION: 25 METER POOL, CHANGING ROOMS: BIDDY POOL i PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMORALEE (N) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY --- -- ~- bIVISIONs PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: COMMUNITY POOL r DEPAitTMENT: PARKS Z RECREATION 1988-94 Total Deficien • 1 ' CHf3... r:.htqa ZAT m _ADMINISTRATION Size bf-ThisT-1koj'6ctIV-Otll.S=d.A 'FINANCIAL1SUMMAAY','(9T;IN THOUSANDS) Pre- i f dais- Construction Land Construction -Other Totall Prior i t j zo i s �x °. 1 I Forecast tzg;�oxo�1 gO OG v c q-j28QX! St{dget Y ar f Y Y AL 92, 0i 48 �� t $ 2 93 OS i } 525E 2 94, b`I2; i OC 40 j l 525=w 7 :Ia80'a IMPA ' ON' FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS!' r ESTIFSA�F..i)§EFUL� y ai� LIFE OF __,F ; . "1 is-sil irsf=Year�of impact 93/94 ___ _ FACIL2tiI'Y Cost per Unit ; _ _.. JinV x4•q , rod Number of Units re j inu 3G 7edmuN Gross Cost., t 169,000 r:f_� ja,2b sao7D $a Less ir= _.ttevenue - 10.250 r Net Impact t 153,750 J-mgml -514 x _ 036 �� �� • } a i4t1,z CAPITAL rmpRovEmzNT ELEMENT First CIE Update: (sprf_nq1989) PROJECT SUMMARY*FORM -ITYPE-OF PUBLIC FACILITY: MULTI PURPOSE FACILITY PROJECT # 705-r PROJECT NAME: MULTI PURPOSE FACILITY DESCRIPTION: GYMNASIUM TYPE FACILITY, WOOD FLOOR, BASKETBALL, BACKBOARDS, BLEACHERS, OFFICES, LOCKER ROOKS PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES M Planning Drstrict Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 61VISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of-Measurement:.MULTI-PURPOSE FACILITY i DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1988-94 Total Deff-c"ien*cy: 1 c. ORGANIZATION:— ADMINISTRATION size of This, iro, ect: -1 FINANCIAL __ Pre Construction Land-*- Construction_ -Other __4ofl�tfal Prior 8 9 Yppecas )ear -ego. 90 Biidg"et AMC- P-11.9 1 96 807 7 910 92 w 94, 96 iKPAC'Tr-,ON, FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS' ESTIMATEDU r&ZW0_tt_-VeMF,bf Imact 91/92 FACILZTY:�-3o� Cost: per unit $ i - - .. I Number. of Units IV giross.160st $ 55,000 20, . Less ,Vs'ek:Revenue - 6,000 );,:" (YEARS Net !-,-act $ 49,000 900K 036 PA'11E 480 'T 71- mmmmm.WW� 1. i s t ""t',, { CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, ` '• F rst CIE Update.. (Sprixig 1989 ) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM. :...... __.. _ .. _, a' TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: JOGGING TRAILS PROJECT._ -706; PROJECT NAME: JOGGING TRAILS DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 3 MILES OF JOGGING TRAILS - UNPAVED PROJECT LOCATION: 3,1,11 GOLDEN GATE NORTH NAPLES IMMOKALEE M (Planning Dstrict_Name).�,_.....f_____..�_._... RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ZS' 910NI- PUBLIC SERVICES - Unit of Measurement: MILES bbARTMENTs PARKS i y 1988;,9�,,Totalpf ciess �' ` sQtas aRECREATION ANIZATION• ADMINISTRATION Size YRi,This FINANCIAL. -bvftU Y ($ IN THOUSANDS ) Year Pre- Construction _ Land _..;- Construction.. Other Total" r a .T• Prior-- 7— forecast 9-90 BtClgat�Y 3 i 22 VIA Y 3 f 22Q 93-94 i 3 + 22 yro IMPACT{{ -ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS. Y., ,0 ..itu 4+u VW V1k 4�//..♦!'.Ji �•,A .�1{ •! " �'"� f1W�i y .,, ra ea'r"Io Impact N/A Cost ill Number: Units $t of Gross Cost'. Ui", er_Revenue - -- - — - me v17: Y S 0�1 Nat ipaat} $ 7oac�hrl? : eH Q— S? i Writ • i jt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FUrst CIE Updatet(Spring,1569) PROJECT SUMMARY -FORM' TYPE"OF PUBLIC FACILITY: REGIONAL PARK LAND PROJECT # 707- PROJECT NAME REGIONAL PARK LAND DESCRIPTIONS ACRES OF REGIONAL PARK- LAND PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES,'. M (Planning DistriFt-Name)-- RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements ACRES DZPARTMExTi,- -PARKS AND RECREATION 1988-94 Total,Defidjdndyt-,,4 :�:.,700 ORIIGWZATTONIADMINISTRATION Siz*',6f'.ThitProjddt'j FINANCIAL SUMMARY Pre - Year. ---Construction Land' -Construction Other Totali PAor -1988 Forecastl 149 9 0 Budget Year ?9% woi-, 0 91 t 20 150 0§"047' 92 7000 —.7000: 9f 93 94 20 7150 1398 :.700 4110WIX"MPAM ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ifist4ear-of-lmpact ESTIMATED -US LIFE OXx:.OT N/A ----FACILITY- NumbdC, of: Units :1 dr6iWCoZtW! $ Lexx User Revenue Not impact Gears) SOW IMPAGE H . .. ' '..'1;r7 •♦jSc<-1• *dry, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Rt First CIE Update . (Spr ng 1989 ) PROJECT SUMMARY.FORM- �- TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: OLYMPIC SWIMMING POOL PROJECT # 708 PROJECT NAME: OLYMPIC SWIMMING POOL ice• DESCRZPTZOKs 50 METER POOL, DECK, -DIVING AREA, LOCKER ROOM, GRANDSTANDS r RESTROOMS, PLAY AREAS ,► PROJECT LOCATION: 3 GOLDEN GATE O (Planning District Name):. Y ;� y-. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY :✓.<:�I , w }DIVISIONs.PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements OLYMPIC;POOL� xDEPARTMENT: PARKS i•RECREATION i 1988-94_Tota1.DeficiencVA ^� ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size'of.This Projects i r FINANCIAL SUMMARY'j ($ IN.T&OUSANDS) Pro- Yeir Construction Land Construction Other Total 1988-89' Forecast► l r l 9�90 91 " 218 21 1991� 92 1246 ; 1 0 t ii134� TO'af r�T 218 1246 100 156 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS..... ESTIMATED,, tISEM � .. zJ.LIFit4OF�rrttci� ; ,�� Fret .Yar of Impact 92/93 a • FACILITXY�t"axb M _ �rs�v�R`. ei3ti 'aagG�; Cost`�perl_Vnit ; ?t Nusbber of Units ? J'sgmh jh4i Gross -Cost--- $ 351,500-_---- . _.......... ...._.._. . �_ 20- Less°User Revenue - 60,000 (YEARS) Net; 2zupact, $ 291,500 J J 4 1 , �i• .-KS a u�'19 } 4 r. t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT F rst CIE Updates(Spr nQ 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TRACK AND FIELD FACILITY PROJECT 4 709 PROJECT NAME: TRACK AND FIELD FACILITY + DESCRIPTION: FULL SIZE TRACK WITH INFIELD AND BASIC TRACK*AND FIELD EQUIPMENT PROJECT LOCATION: 3 GOLDEN GATE ( � )) Plann na District Name ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY i DMSIONs,PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: -TRACK a FIELD . fiiPARTMENT:::PARKS G RECREATION' 1988-94 Total Deficient e'°"= �7 ORGANIZATION:,ADMINISTRATION Size'bf This Projects y FINANCIAL"SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) ? M; - u Pre - .Year _. Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1088-89 Forecas �46 92 _Yco � b 17, •93 19 t 93 94 j 157 !-' z'atai 19 '; - 157 15 .191 ! x azSMPACT ON.FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTTMATEAAUSE •' LIFE OF !'ffst7Year:of Impact 94/95 aY1'q Cost. per Unit i $ _ . , t, Number of units, , : �•. _ Grossr,Costt 81000 es�,Vsez Revenue NaCmpact $ 8.00 ':.F. �600K Q36PSG` y '•�1p.'.y } .r if V.t* 1 .. _ �,�"•���_ft iy .. C• E+r•J•F't / P�•I�Y �M= • Sm,• CAPITAL IMPR t F r� at C11 p ate.i Spring RROJECT SUMMARY,FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: BOAT RAMP.: PROJECT 4'710' PROJECT NAME: BOAT LANES ';' i r;'� !, n :i : irl✓; :. i i., r:1 DESCRIPTIONz.•; BOAT RAMP LANES,: PARIaNG'40. SPACES, FISH CLEWING "TABLE, rl , ':. RESTROOMS, PICNIC AREA, LANDSCAPING,:TOT.LOT PROJECT LOCATION: (N) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY PIYISZONz:-.PUBLIC.SERVICES Unit of Measurements S-! CIV t DEP + ZTIENTt� PARKS i RECREATION i 1988-94.:Total •D�fi+�ien':Z1'!Z OR�iAN�ZATION1, ADMINISTRATION Size;cf ".This Proj act ;12-ZACj FINANCIAL SUM KARY • (9 ' IN THOUSANDS) t Pre - Construction Land f: Construction Other Totai , Prior �ois4 t! Forecas 9-9Q 59 113 435 11 Qf�Q6r p B-d-dqet• ear 1 I I, • q t,u i990-91 32 1 113 f 235 j 6 �taE:3g a 19 mi 92 j4_ 32 ; 113 235 6 �8 . 93 32 113 235 `? 6 94 321. _ 113 236 6�8 .� ,�•a 7"v yd r r 187 565 I 1376 135 -U2164 jKP�,CT :ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS /� : • . `'. ESTIMATED I VS LIFE OF ' L�Mear: of Irtipact 90/91penit $ er of Units Gross,Cost $ 2,000 j��,,20 ' Zi4di�','�UBerr"Revenue Net •Impact i $ 2.000 7ait tii 1185 rY & ~ELEMENT.' First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT #,711 PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY PARK #7 DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY PARK WITH BALLFIELDS, TOT LOTS, COURTS, LANDSCAPING, FOOTBALL/SOCCER,FIELDS PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES M (" Plane ing-District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY kON: D PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: �C''6MKUNITY PARK DEARTMENT3, PARKS & RECREATION 1988-94 Total Defici!'ncy: 2 10, ZAT;O,: ADMINISTRATION 6 of ThfS1roject':P'tp 66 FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN,THOUSANDS ) Pro - as Construction Land Total kiarp Z 00 768 "86 9 3:-_i '100 s 132V' T r-1. 41 -94 1471 1471 0MV 061 768 .IIOACT� ON. FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS &Zlear' ESTIMATED USEFUL;f.l. 1 of Impact 94/95 CC�tt�er: Unit ; LIFE -;OF FACILITY. ,, H $ Units Gfbss. cost $ 131;600 Liss.User Revenue - 12,000 ' 20 (YEARS: N*l' mpact $ 119'6TO- -Ok 4,1 RECONCILIATION -bit- PkbaiCTA.;td:;Wd- -DEFICIENCY LO) 4 1 AAM V4 �J. LDU OF SERVICE IT=AAh" l3SfPllWtTA'PM 21% MWIMSIDMIAL nPULATION rap 4. F I VM COUNTY REQUIRED PtAIME1 AVAILABLE IWICIEWM (MT) AT YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.00024Jo0 if CIP 11,133,930 17-111 r 64082 13.70 17.75 A s-l" 0614 U.0 44.251 —.13.30 ... (S'as'llm W" 71246 17.50 1 13.50 Wit 74828 11.30- 1 "Do 21 so -3:20- 5,161,57 " ll'�78411 11.20 21:50 1311, i211,03f s k'l, 92-U Ilm 20.10 21.34 •1.41 215471502 t1o""2110% 10.16 WAS n --on 21 so 4 ft, 22.00 PM 23.00 21:50 11.501 (2,730,PSI _,18173t, to'. 24 21 96 yz If 107375 2t:4" 21.50 (3.601 (1,02,1411 106575 -2t. 7 6TIT-00. 110M 27.10 so nml 111,27yoll Ole POPULATION KID 116d In i COUNTY REQUIRED MAKI PAIUKE IDEFICIM) (CM) AT TIlt PER101 SERVICE ARU 2431CAPITA M CIP P,5734 Tj 7124& 17.50 (41 13.50 14MP - fUh Vill 18321 4 PATOTAL 11773 22i01 14 21.50 (i Tat Wil 21000 5.110 0 0. to Isall jcwl It YEAR TOTAL 21.50 15.601 J ;lr) TIA47MY q m z Ic 740y;'l. pen J4 1 m4t r. 100K Gas PA% .. * � y r•`' Sid �. ,'j',. rvJ �. "•w� r ,r�s.'jt j !irtia a�t'tda 'f_ � � •, c � ., a N 4" CAPITAL-IMPROVEMENT"ELEMENT First CIE.0 ate Spr ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF.PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT #800 / 3, PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN -MANATEE ROAD TANK TO US41 - MANATEE.ROAD%TO WESTWIND DR. MEP (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NES. 465,,PART F 516) i DESCRIPTION: 740 L.F. OF 16' ,WATER MAIN - r . PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA PALM CREEK O (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIE97/.: f DMSIONs UTILITIES. Unit of Measurements; ? DEPARTMENT:,,ADMINISTRATION i 1988-94;Total_ ficien a,f � t _ �11 y. ORGANIZATION:; WATER 2 3 Size of Th a Projgct f,-^���u.na� FINANCIAL;SUMjtr,�( ; ZN TSOUS S) "r I Construction Land Pre- Construct- n: Other Total _ r Prior ' i y 41, 1988-89 0* 2001 Forecast 1489-90 Budget ear ! ;, • } 991-92 9 93 I ce= kRr f 94 A !,qf JUTURE ERATING BUDGETS $STIMATEt?I•VSEFU �°`a'j 3?2., ► LIFE OF Fits Y _ ar.1of Imps 88/89;1 1rFACTDITYx_•3 Cosa er Unit 1 $ 439 .t1nV,1eq ln07 ,. r:of Units! 7400 -� �i,L IQ �� 4 ar s Cost $ _ 3648 20^ T�f a, car -Rev ue - 3648 et .IpAW $ — �►''aCONTRIBUTION IN AID COST ONLY, I.E. DEVELOPER TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ,, COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN COST. AE pPAGE 4O� r; BOOK .r y s .E . ' w a f � : '. l •,y r 1. s i $ ;,'c :'L :Z'+p +^+�.'+`, Avt lt` F �r + + i. ? CAPITALIMPR&EMF.NT'ELEI►IEN'' First CIE U atej• Spr nq 19891 PROJECT''SUMMARY FORM ' r TYPE -OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 1 1 PROJECT NAME: 20" WATER MAIN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD — COUNTY BARN ! ,. ROAD TO US 41 A s> DESCRIPTION: 6560 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 4&5 SOUTH/EAST NAPLES• • i M (Planning District Name) '- RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 4 Y- DZYISION:_.UTILITIES Unit of MeasuremeiitFTl :t!01P-1 ►X DEPARTMENTS ADMINISTRATION 1 1988-94:Tota]. DefiEiencyit� .ORGANIZATIONS' WATER - G Size of This Pr63e6t:001TAZIYACna FINANCIWSVMMARY`,(9' tN THOUSANDS) r • Pre- f7te#t Construction' sand "A Construction, ' Oler Td_ta_ Prior � • ,xo.taa +� � 6-89 ! ' w�', ee�8a�t •� ,; 56 392 µfit> Sttdget Year a�j; 8 "ft�! . i r �•. ' ;� . +jar_ � = ' 92 •92 93 � I � , f „y,•� � g� s��',� Wt 94 e ,•�ti a7rJ�iu'� �. ai 56 ' • w 392 _ _ %.•�i �: "'2MPACT•' 8N FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS + Ffr`s£IYeir•'of Impact 89/90 _ �'-FAC2.ITYx1 Cost'.per Unit .493 :io! ,t Numbereof •Units : ; 6560 *' 1d '' t1 Gross_.. Cost__.__ $ 3234 Less(User',.Revenue - 3234 .{ ac(years) Net -Impact ; . � ..:i kt\f 1'}j.i, J •�' iA� .. D ^. • C;.A v hi y ton C E.r��,rt�,$9 ,. .DY C 3•i.{TY 9'. {° - .' ,� a x ', pad { 4p .".'� • �A 71 "' CAPITAL'IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; #. { First CIE UpdateASpr ng _1989) R PROJECT'•SUMMARY' FORM rw. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 4 862 t' PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN COUNTY BARN ROAD - DAVIS BLVD.' SOUTH TO EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 427) DESCRIPTION: 5900 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN - - PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES EAST NAPLES O (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISZONk_UTILITIES Unit of Measurement':- 0, •,,A To �1TMENTr,ADMINISTRATION 1988-94'=fA, f ANiZATZONr WATER Size of This Pro�etct:i%Ot ' SxhACRa ? FINANCIAL'• SUMMARY ($ -IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Construction ;Lands ConsCrttction� 'Other Totill Pg!or i 48 254 E30� ForeCas I rs,gp�zo'K 89 90 tf F +e -4b d it car, xa RIiG�9 uH to03 IAf y: 9$ 94 �, r w. ff7l al 48 254 1 '• : 101 N ACT!ON_,FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS `;;; S'�IMF►$"`�S ^. Trfrk�gi LIFE OFt:Yeariof Impact 87/88 t i4FACILITY7 Cost, per Unit ; $ .493 1,, v i:yj :14 � Number of Units} 5900 Gross Cost $ 2909 �.__. �200'anolD A" esstbser,Revenue '' r.. years Net' -Impact . 8 ` 'tell ' ti tt i?�a llL�.. XCC�I :'•. f,r"a 600K i:U� POSE 490 X CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT z F rst CIE U atei(Spr ng 1989) PROJECT • SUMMARY FORM TYPE. OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM 'PROJECT # 803. PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN DAVIS BLVD. - WILDWOOD ESTATES TO FOXFIRE (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NOS.•411, 413, 414) X DESCRIPTION: 11,070 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN ct : PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES EAST NAPLES _. F (ti (Plann ng D str ct,Name .. . RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurementy, ` DEPARTMENT:, ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 .Total DefiCiencg►!:,^�X-', �" I ORGANIZATIONk-NATER _ Size of This, Projects::TT�"jgh:F-^ 'K."72 77 »« FINANCIAD SUMMARY. $,)IN THOUSANDS) Pre— .. . , «r,• ::' t Construction !Land Construction Other Total x ` or, 47 503 -X0550 Forecas b '' Sud�etl ear Iti trt , ' f a 1�CT;;QN _ F UTURE OPERATING BUDGETS i" ESTIMATWIUSEFU z3 3.. ; LIFE aF p ;t gear ;of Impact 87/88 s.:. t 3;�FAC=ITYs t COst!.per Unit ( t .492 Number.,of Units 11070 ~' o `ldfiiA Gross; Cost 8 5458 20D zs:n CP L8?3f" ser=-•Revenue - 5458 FZ:, (years azaJ " Nets=mpact ; xr� J . 100K \itl�'E4 ��, I� if � "",•. 4, CAPITAL ' IMPRM1. TELbdit2'"' i. F r� st CIE Xp ate Spr nq 1989) PROJECT •SVMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT i 804 PROJECT NAME: 20" WATER MAIN - DAVIS SLVD.'-- C.R. 951' TO RADIO ROAD •''' } (MASTER PLAN PROJECT N0: -457) DESCRIPTION: 2640 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL rAKA PALU CREEKr y (Planning District Name) RESPbNSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY pIVZSZON:,.•._UTILITIES Unit of Measuremeati ' ! D JRTMENT:t`. ADMINISTRATION 1988-94=fio�ar �e£�� ieneyr ;., ZATION:s WATER Size of This Bro�6 tfiiOlT iSlY,hOSU A, r FINANCIAV'SV10M0,RY1,-($=1N THOUSANDS) ' Pre- ,. j Year'= 4 = Construction Land Construction -,Other Totai Prior 27 I 140 Forecast x�eos�IcsB Stud 't^;Y f t ot 'tea~ M r„•� , 27 140 14TI 11CT..01L.FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS = - -tSTtkAlWftEFUL Yearfof Impact 87/88 mr IrAt L`tT x2 sV ' Cost' "per Unit t ; 493 _tru x�q sab Nctaber of Units 1 2640 Gross- Cost ._ _ $ 1302 Less �Tser:•evenue - 1302 _. __ �+� -(Years ? R NO;mpact $ - 4 A. vr A - t00% UP--A-sr 492 y CAPITAL -IMPROVEMENT ' ELEMENT First CIE-,Update,(Spring 1989) PROJECT -SUMMARY FORM 8 TYPE -OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 4 805 6L PROJECT NAME: 12" INTERCONNECT -WEST SIDE TO EAST SIDE OF US 41.AT 91 AVE. (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 195) DESCRIPTIONt 200 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (i) (Planning.District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY. DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement:,7* DxyAra MENT NISTRATION 1988-94.,,lota1-Deficiencytai ZATIONs-WATER: ORGANZ Size of This Proj acts FINANCIAL.=MKARYrA$_:'IN THOUSANDS) Pre -_Construction Land ,,s, Construction, :-Other Total 981.- 3 26 -1,2 91 F8 8 9 rotecaxt Z Ana- T ol fts 9! 9.0. i tar 2192", 4 ASIA. 3 26 FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS : ESTIMATED• USEFUL I �oprj LIFB Of cf .Impact 87/88 Xtil -, Unit $ .493 Nkdab-ot of Units 200 Gross Cost $ 99 201 tow'ss" User 1. Revenue - — 99 7::(years) —7 7j Neliapact' 1 $ fog OX ?A acy let S ,J a �f. 2i �,rr,I�+lrc grF-. �M,�'!Y 4C: •�E *; N '�G*^ +�y!r9+���5?`R" . [ x r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT'., F rat CIE Update; spring 1501 FROJECT�SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 806 PROJECT NAME: 12" INTERCONNECT - NORTHSIDE TO SOUTHSIDE OF 111 AVE AT =k 7ST. (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 162) DESCRIPTION: 100 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (t) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY wIMPACT ON DEFICIENCY S�ONs _UTILITIES i Unit of Measurements`" VI' XDMINISTRATION 1988-94''Totaf-bef nt V;' ._._. ORGANIZATIONc WATER Size of This Projects' ! FINANCIA `L'.9UyfiM-j (#' IN 'THOUSANDS) Pre— _......_ _��..� Year Construction Land ' Construction Ot�er Total 13 1988--89 .!f I Forecast, (F s c 4 4r � HtfdyattiY ar" ts` f4 �90-91 92,MY ' 93 94 i LQ�j il i 1 13M E1Y ACTVON: OPERATING BUDGETS: ESTIMATED�ia-li � vah+'af Impact 87/88 ' �° ._. LIFEOF Cost*per Unit ; .493•,.a^ Number of Units 00 • ! , .i 3:> Ai` i Cost.._ _ . _ ; 0s;.UseraRevenue - 50 Y ars 4Zmpact ; _=± z e36Pr«E4s4 '4 C P TA • 112 ZgYR=r a" First CIE p ate.,., Spr PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE. OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, ;PROJECT # 808 7 RR=CT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN - AUDUBON COUNTRY, CLUB - VANDERBILT DRIVE TO US 41 (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 250) DESCRIPTION: 5230 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (T) (Planning District Name) REMPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY: DIVISIONS UTILITIESN ;;s j Unit of MeasuremontlT'.� .i�70 DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94-,Tctal-Defteiencyt:ll P4 c 3 . ,.t ... � ZATIONi .WATER Size of This Projectm vrn' o FINANCIAL?SUMMARY.-.(f;.IN THOUSANDS) 4 7 7 r Pre- Year" ..Construction Land ,.�., Construction. DOt er Totall',` . r.r.rvs Y' Dior 1 ` 200 Ntid st' Y ar ? i 8 et x,a: t: 7e�Pbug a $ 1 t ACT�AN FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS y.. �� ESTIMATM.VSEFUL Lirst;�3tLIFE or saf,of Impact 87/88 r 3FACIL2TY_V`" Cost` der' Unit $ .493 taU ..7�q lap:;;.7 K z Number of. Units 5280 2j1,.'i '10 x.eMr�urR Gross Cost . $ 2602 20•.') s.ir",;) Less-fJSe='Revenue - 2602 z:ve1 Net, Iiupact`' $ - BOOK 036►�ct�5 14 'a < r;. r' 1 ' .. 1 i �y w .0 r !V :X ��Iilr CAPITAL IMP First CIE Update Spring 989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF_PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER STORAGE TANK PROJECT #-810 M WCT„NAME:, CARICA ROAD STORAOR TANK(NOTIN MASTER PLAN) - DESCRIPTIONS_ WATER STORAGE TANK AND -LAND REPLACEMENT COSTS -TO CITY - OF NAPLES (A! i 078CT LOC?►TION s 1 ORTH NAPLES Ii) (Pla�District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY: bmsr0NS,,UTILITIES Unit of -Measurements; « ; .1.T ' DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION �11988-9,4 Total Deficiency, >, 3' "Aw 3 Ht7 1* 114ADA i ,Ti V.L:. RATER. ize_ot_..This- Projects---- =r .'t FINANCIAL SUMMARY(# IN THOUSANDS Pre- air -Construction Land Construction uOther �r Total! '? a Prior 1350 E8-1350 R M: 18b:JbXO� ast 9-90 BttdQet. Year : Q_,Ott; 3IT' t!?13.50 Ay9[M 350 J ;. 2NPACT'ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED••USZM . ,�«., .. •:.. , LIFE AM �aaa �S4 _ r rst;,Year of Impact 87/88 - ai cFACILITIGtWwN ' COst}per,�Unit e = ,Zoo SEd3o r f NttmbeF;,of~Units ,.,, -st , «; •..1 cross .Cost ° ` $ Lesa User Revenue - 8737 _ __. lyears ---� ' Ns� Zmpact S ^V I )} DOOK03 6 PALL 496 y Y J 0 CI S h;�. rr $y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; First CIE. U to :(Sprng :1 89). PROJECT SUMMARY,'FORM'''- ` TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 809 PROJECT -NAME: CARICA ROAD STORAGE TANKS AND PUMP ,STATION DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION OF EXISTING 5 MG TANK AND CONSTRUCTION OF 1 NEW 5 MGD TANK AND REPUMP STATION PROTECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES I (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY l DMSION: UTILITIES r S Unit of Measureniet7FA S,7e12Ko:iR , �DEPARTMENTs._ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total ciencyr ;Oias Y` ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) i Year-=------� Pre— ---Construction --Construction " ' " """" Land" bt2 i wea :Flax -lotIq Forecast e, 90; 340 1700 gas 04� BttdQet Y4, ar -91;� 0k $8tt �Y 'y' 9 1-92` y i 92 93i 3-94 ILQ� dF _i E8•0 10 r Future - j � Ate- e � es 340 , _ .1700:. ESTIMATED USA A�TroN FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS i .,. ' ifii tytiv f Impact 90/91 •z;�3-LIFE FACIi2R�5C i thisatilrf 7c! plaits , s:, �: 7�Y. _ ...__.... _ .. lr✓ 3Flw4 ,T'J -ii�. • Gross Cost' i ; 114377 -. •.--..--- '• �d' ect'1erY3 �� Leas User Revenue - aEt 114377 (years)- J �ooK 036 ►A, 497 M. i F• 3 Mgt v �♦ r ! � a .liy<ti�n 1 � ,� , Mkt '? •. n _ "� .} :•?"". 1 CAPITAL IMPS VEMENT•' E First CIS Update,,(Spr nq 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TREATMENT PLANT .'PROJECT # 811 PROJECT NAIVE: LAND ACQUISITION FOR NORTH'COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT (PART OF MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. NWTP-1) ti DESCRIPTION: LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES '^;.;'• (�) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY s IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY' D SIONjUTILITIES r:' i Unit of Measureinentil, sm-ADMINISTRATION'f1988 94 'To�n�: De fn1enLyi ' `- G I VIF IG ANIZATION:icWATER `; size of This Vro�'acti�orasxt2rlAL? ^� FINANCIAL 'SUMMARY =•(ZsIN THOUSANDS) ff ' u Year" t cti ` k� x„ Pre- ! -c ="•� , �� 6nstruction Land.rc:. Constru on ' •�OtLr 20"ta1 r Pribr 088 •89 i 50 @ F.orecas r fasnexol 90 fiber' y �i9`Q�i 1 ; Btidyettar,. TOtii 50 *ft dMPACT.:ONFUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS' ESTIMASEFUL M LIFE OF F first Yem'of Impact N/A `•` =t:: 3 it FACILITY Costs -per -Unit $ _. #tnli �s�q;_ Number* bf. Units - _ti_. P 1 i flu . �o t+rimui3 r* } years Netylmpact, $ w J,v, K. •d✓raj �:,. ,_ ":�,:.�`i'�k -. q1 L Y r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT, ELEMENT x First CIE-Updatw,,Spr nq 1989) PROJECT • SUMMARY � FORM TYPE,OF PUBLIC. FACILITY: WELLFIELD r : ; ...:.>; , . :. ,.e : PROJECT 8812: Fib IIROJBCT NAME: CORAL REEF WELLFIELD -STUDY (PART OF MASTER PLAN,,PROJECV , :NO. NRW-1) l DESCRIPTIONS �, ;•, ;._ .. '_i+!'+ :r'' , t]I�r3�i PROJECT LOCATIONS 8+9 RURAL ESTATES '-CORKSCREW ;C:( ";.�;•. +`?� (1) (Plane nq•D str ct Name) t •_:'' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY:.... DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement n: ,? DEPARTMENT:,,ADMINISTRATION i 1988.94.:Tota1'DefiaiencylaMT ilt?YII s, 2ATiONs_i; WATER :• Size of This Project:v.c TTR^Iw,LSit3 FINANCIAL SUrIIKARY;. (; 'IN THOUSANDS) Pre- } �d r tear, -r:, <-.: Construction r:, Construction-. :Other Tota prior." 220Q20, �8-89 7 } 1 ,8r#388t a E'Orecast Budget Ylar :93 4 220 {{ w 1TIMATMIUS ��ONryXUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS.! '" < . '; i�: ES 4 r. : LIFE • OF x Y x Yeaz -of Impact N/A =. FACILITY ! Cost per Unit ' Number of Units ,... ,. _ _ _; : !►s ^ ttd CrCss cost LT;tsTserr•Revenue - ,•:7 years a Net+Zmpact` 8 �„a` lOOK ,�rr• '..M �JV6!'AGE4� '��/'iJV .� .is 4�1. �•`' f• r l� ^���V�, �' 7*f * 4r� t� ,�, ..:, Y ! 'i ✓ ,r lea }'.'% v�.�F•�Ctic C{'IY+' r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT ^ First CIE Update I(Spr ng _1 989 ) -PROJECT-SUMMARY-FORM `. r TYPS OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 813 PROJECT NAME:. 12" WATER MAIN - RADIO ROAD.- COUNTRYSIDE TO FOXFIRE DESCRIPTION:_ 2430 L.F. OF 12" WATER -MAIN.. - PROJECT -LOCATION: 3 GOLDEN GATE (i) (Planning D strict.Name)., RESPONSIBLB.AGENCY _ .__IMPACT.ON-DEFICIENCY— DIVISION: UTILITIES j Unit of Measurements DLPARTMENTt-'ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 TotallDeficiency: » . }.t A. t n ♦ T 1 ..;YV1�i`�i _." .1 R: Sri.. '� 9:✓1 it}14 ti.4 i� 'MCA MVLAAlLM ORGA=ZATION: WATER Size of This Project:41. FINANCIAL_SUMMARY--(E--IN -THOUSANDS)- .- ....... J; Pre- Year I Construction Land Construction Other Total �9 90i1i y.b`Year i 17 - 85 ; 102 �. i 0 E h� a.. x f %'C__P.SV_,FU,TURE _ OPERATING BUDGETS a -- - ESTIMATED LISMip ; �-ear;, o Impact 89j9� FACILITY Cos'�'�s.:Zlnit $ .493 Numbefldf Vnits ; 2430 zrrtl a �r4O Gross Cost ! ; 1198 . 20. Leas'Xser Revenue - 1198 Net`•Impacttj ; �• toot 036 PA,c 5 iid10 py ti CAPITAL TMP9-MOTELEMENT . First CIE Update-(Spr nq 1989) `e PROJECT SUI*My FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEtM i`;FROJECT'815�' r PROJECT NAMEt 16" WATER MAIN - PINE RIDGE ROAD TO AIRPORT r .. .. ,. _..w. _.: LIVINGSTONE ROAD DESCRIPTION:--- 5280 L.F. OF 16" WATER- MAIN'.._...,_.._.._. PROJECT LOCATION: 1&2 NORTH/CENTRAL'NAPLES M ( Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: rl.�l'riUA DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:qjTAW ;* ORGMZATIONt WATER Size of This Projects y r 4 y ti -..-.--_ FINANCIALS UMMARY "(;' IN THOUSANDS ) .. Pre ± h Construction- ---Land-"- -Constructim _0 air- """ } 'ro"a� . Prior ` 1I88-8945�seoa�{S Forecas - /� � y' r °'rye-'•' t `"' C 1 c �S�j ,a +Ay't�y� ..}7 i.1, y'2S4 •$'� I�.-Sd Wyiio#T- i ' q .. •=, F, �" .. 4}at err � '�7„��'r. A�e qt IMPACT S OH FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS F„STZMATED USEM,M ..Year of Impact 88/89V ,.S:1 FACILITY'` Cost per Unit $ 493 Frt r df-units I 5280. Grexixost ). " $ 2603 JrsQvesi �syJ xat'1 , IAssVser Reverse - 2603.._ " Neimpact- ._ s w .. - years)s y�U f r ����7 rj� ��.1` S. � ..•�, s x, t 4 Trsr,,d�: r tq, ,t�: Caa` ea F' + r �... r iss i, CAPITAL Ik�ROVENlENT ELEMf: m 'First, CIE U ate•, (Spz nq 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM Jr. TYPE OF'PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 816 PROJECT NAMEt 20" WATER MAIN - GOODLETTE ROAD EXTENSION -PINE RIDGE ROAD TO CARICA ROAD STORAGE TANK DESCRIPTION: 10,500 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIM PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES 1 (D (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Fi DIVISIONs:UTILITIES Unit of Measuretaentt - — .. -._., 7 ,1111,bAsa A DEPARTMEpTs•=ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Tota1'Defic3e`ncyt �� OMANIZATIONv,'iWATER Size of This'";Project: y t k FINANCIAL�� SUI�7AR_Y^'( $IN TSOUSANDS j . ;• Pre- i I Year I Y w' Construction Land . � Construction OLer_. _ To" 99888.89 112 pP.,gi12 ' Forecas 8990 627 36ftit ear,41 i r92 1 R i F'► ir.�v' � tea � 112 -j_ _627� ACT1'ONR "FOTURLt ` OPEAT RING BUDGETSEMtray : iJ ZIFE�, OF._ � , 3_ st yd"7of Impact 89/90 ` ° -' ` - ___ _. i1 � FACILITt� 00 4 Cost -`Per xmit 44 ; 493 _.. -y, Number of ,,Units f 10560 Gross Cost ; 206 .ess (Vser"..Reven4e - 5206 (years Net Impact i $ a BOOK14 PAGi ' `�' "�f �`f ., yap .. 1 �• . 7 -CAPITAL-IMP ELEMENT rim ate;, TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # sl,71 PROJECT NAME: t, 12" WATER MAIN .`SEAGATE DRIVE%rn- VS, 41..TO.-PELICAN.,B AY DESCRIPTIONs 2640 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN, PROJECT LOCATION: 1&2 NORTH/CENTRAL NAPLES (rJ-AnnlnV,.plstrlct Nam;), 45- RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit Of Measurafmantiru lv0l2lv;C DIPARTWSADMIN IS efi %.1 w..W nr 6iaikiATION: WATER Site of This. -Project ITAtTyu;046 71 7 7 IN THOUSANDS) T, Pre- YO Construction !;Land:,, Construction, Other Toth 9 fecas90 sir e 9 4 i 01 lit 90 �99T OPERATING BU WZYTS '1-0;1 ITXW� 11 agUT XSTIMATZb,�ts Llrg:* Cr. rMpact •88/89 Ir" d6 $ 49 'IrFACI=TY' Number of Units' •640 J:fl,u 'Inn • GrosX.Cost $ L4A84Uxer'_Revenue v20, azo-xcr 130 v d*!-,: $ emrx ------------- K4W part rs 1A r a4 .'.jS ♦ .�• ! •'fix. ,��bY � �� � •rr r.T.'Mr��4 L j•, a• y,' �:. .�• Y♦ I+'ri,.y' r1.1117' .� '�� ''i R s'a OAl?ITAL' IMPRt�BMENT' E�� < First CIE . V ate, .(Spr n9 1989 ) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYP& OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT,#,818 PROJECT NAML Ad" WATER MAIN - AIRPORT ROAD - VANDERBILT ROAD TO ,. IMHOKALEE ROAD rt=+ ` DESCRIPTION: 10,560 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES ': (A) (Planning District Name) ?., RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY' Rµ, r DVISION:W"ILITIES unit of MeasuremOnti , L DL�PAliT�rAbMINISTRATION 1988-94'Total'Deicienci�R�3� ±`n 4 fix? i •� _. ZATION:'11"TER 'Lt; Size of This Fsojictf "'z"�"z''''�'v:'G FINANCIAL BVPIl�SARY' (� , IN THOUSANDS) ` Pra- 'Construction Lan4P Con"siiiicticn•' '}otter, Tdua . Prior Forecast -90; ? ' 0e & nl s. 0 BtidQet� ear 508 13 Y ja$8 ; Stu -92 rf„el r3 t s rb, z 91 'iJT(JRE ETS OPERATING BUDG: ESTYIATRD`U5EFUL d + . L.IFR,,.OI, ! tiB�rYear of Impact 89/90 - FActft Ya , Coale, per .Unit - . $ .493_._ ��4� w Number- of Units 10 60-- _. _ ?11nJ to .^cac:�ruvt dross L�ost� $ 5206__ .: _�Q..C»i•, A tTser''Revenue - 5206 - years Net Impact i t �ic . n. DOOR (AZS �3�d J ID If CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - ELEMENT. tk:i F rst CIE Update (Spring 19 9) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPff„OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM :. PROJECT •819,•r} PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN - IMMOKALEE ROAD TO WILLOUGHBY ACRES i 1 j f DESCRIPTION: 2000 L.F. OF 12"- WATER. MAIN PR=CT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (ik) (Planning Distr ct Name) > MPWSI$LE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY `. DIVISION: UTILITIES 1 Unit of Measurement: 1 's. DEPARTMENT:- ADMINISTRATION 1988-94•,;gtal, Deficiency,:. �n ORGANIZATION: . WATER Size of This Proj,ects.,.-•'«••,>~ R`' r _ FINANCIAL SUMMARY (Z-IN THOUSANDS) 1 # Pro - Yea Construction Land Construction. -,Olor Total .y ED— ir ldint ` r SOY 13 69 pis' �� 5� �qk I r ''w"{ '� :•iiY.AY', Y 1.Y ^ 'i: 9=92-dltl •+, r a.. r �j 3- .> •i�x!� i% to �. y ACTION FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATEDiiUSE :•�� rw LIFE OF F •ieA?;f, Impact 89/90 ;;, ,r j,FAC ZRiTY:xi Cal tzpGrinit $ 493 J n.I -I j-4 laoo r Number of Units 2000 Gross Cost ; 986 v 0 . Less -User Revenue 986 , _ years - Net Impact• $ q s-k ti Y . .r ,ems • �,�t �±� I � �v. � •,4.x s`- .� �.: .". First CIE U ate °(Spr nq 989 ) " PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ..PROJECT # 820 PROJECT NAMES 16" WATER MAIN - iMMOKALEE ROAD - WILLOUGHBY ACRES TO LMNGSTONE ROAD EXTENSION ' DESCRIPTION: 3500 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (D (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION_:, _ vTILITIES Unit of Measurera*dts"I"' :1 0;Ll l Vl(l j DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:'M"�'` ' ,ZATIONrWATER Size of This PiijacC�.t?] i'ASYDtAt13G► ak,t' x.; FINANCIAL SUMMARY (; IN THOUSANDS) ;.. i Pre- 4 Yiar _: Construction Land Construction` Other Total Prior Y . a�s91", Oka fid y 89-90 34 dget ear 169 E203 0@^�s@L� F sr. G�- N i':i� �f' j.h' 4i 1 YI 4 t,:. i• .I d'f��' 'R" ip �a' � 1*u ure , a7L• �u'3 Tbtal 34 169 }4203� =a ZMPACVOKZrVTURE OPERATING BUDGETS % ' S IM�►T$3'�tTS �� ' First:Yeat'`of Impact LIFE O_F 89/90 " FAC a 3 4' Cost .per Unit j ; rSU , ��� apq � t ^ TY •O N=ber. of Units; — 350 �:; ^ ;:� tr:w► 1o> Yo�dmm 6ross�Cost - ... t `p Less(User:Revenue - _ 1725 years) Net, Impact S 4 w• , t f 'js 60oK PACE 1 � k , 1 *r :` CAPITAL• IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT F rst CIE Update Spr nq 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM CTYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 821'.:I r PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN - VANDERBILT DRIVE - AUDUBON:COUNTY.CLUB TO BONITA BEACH ROAD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 259, 260)' .... DESCRIPTION: 5840 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATIONS 1 NORTH NAPLES ; :~ (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES — Unit of Measurement---,, ^* ! ,r... DEPARTMENT;i:ADMINISTRATION 1988-94.- ta1,'Deficiencys;:� A t^ ZJ1Z'IONs�:1WATER °- Size of This;Projectl+ t� i FINANCIAZo.SUMKARY,•_•(8'aN THOUSANDS) Pre- { f Construction ;Land :c.,Construction:. oiher Total Prior . 988=89 o ( 265 zr265 Forecas j e8-882t ear -its , ? 92[„ I yM ply j., 9� Z01 3 1 awc , r . •, f. I t . • B'�tii�t,,Jli x�Y ..,u((�� 265 9XMPAC7,;QN,;•FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS :., ESTIMATEII:USEFUL` Y �*L• i3..�i.� F earlof Impact - 88/89 ,; ILIAC OF - �FACILITY7.. Cosh'per Unit i Nianber' of Units _.-. __ S 493 j r:tt zs 7ao� 5 40 _ ...._ Gross Cost a 1rt' t 2879 20 (. sei: RRevenue Net Zsnpact + - 28 99 _ `•,,�., BOOKUPAA7 ' ... .. ,� G ' . r . Vfj ice% Yi.' . ii pI fii ,ji - s e:"!' a fi � v! ✓�i"� ' CAPITAL' IMPROVEMFn ELt F rat CIE U ate:(Spr nq 1989) +?.. PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT i 823 PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN - ON CR 951 FROM MANATEE ROAD'.TO:CR 952 ;, DESCRIPTIONS 23,700 L.F. OF 12"'WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 6 _ MARCO (A) (Planning D str ct Name) , RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY, DIYZSION: UTILITIES. Unit of Measurementil,°i ":, ..- .: DEPAZtTMF�tT1�.ADMINISTRATION 1988-94:.Tota1 Deficiencyr- wm ORGANIZATION: twTATER Size of This Project%V1,�7 TAj' - FINANCIAL. SUMMARY-,($ -.IN THOUSANDS) Pre- ? } Yeah Construction Landr;t` Construction ;Other Total 8riof jjjj t$ 4 �} t N Fdrecasi JIWWMLr` ' 'z;uoaxa3 . 7§0 73 ' '.. N f. 808 0e 8udyet ear, r. ,ce81 .iEn e6ve „ 1 91=92 re 992-93 i €e�fiaet x, 1993 94 ,: j{j1 }y t 73 808 _. tt882 Q'IMPACTrON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS :..: '.... :' ESTIMATED:•,USEFU4 .,y,:j? -=.' Firmxearjef Impact LIFE OF 89/90 I 3 FACILITYx? Cost -per Unit t .493 Number of Unitst a 23700 - ( }� a Y0c 1jj �•� Gross. Cost ; 11684 ,, i i 20 •. N`s; IIser: Revenue - 11684 ()- years) Net Impact ; I I fN;w�F�rs"la1C'K i t ` +es �if,fN tie r • ' 3.. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT' First CIE Update -(Spring 1989) <_ PROJECT SUMMARY FORM Cy TYPE''OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 824 r PROJECT NAMEt 12" WATER MAIN - CR 951 TO CAPRI STORAGETANK'.• r DESCRIPTION1 5500 L.F. OF 12 WATER MAIN— PROJECT LOCATION: 6 MARCO ,f O (Planning D str ct Name) ,R 1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY. =� D7YZSIONs_UTZLiTIES Unit of Measurement: .: ct MARTMEN'Pr• ADMINISTRATION 1988-94" T6taZ Defidiencti' q3U ZATION z 1 VATERZQ Of Si Thisft pr'oi$cti%al'3'/;S:is,4ab x ti. s, FINANCIAL•'SUMMARV(;•-IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction , Land Construction Other Total Prior ; 1988-$9 i 'P Orecas i C3-8espt `90 Oe�C ftdQet ear 17 187 244 •91 93 r } lrtitire 187 204 '$f�►i17 Y XMMPxCv0 =FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMA'rE1S'+CS EW FirstiYaamp r'of Iact _ 89/90 LIFE OF a'� FACI'�ITYsy 7 ^ Coat=•per Unit ;_.86 per L.F. ` Ntm ber of Units _ 5500 a� ins 1c� 7dd,au7; S#rASS;.CQst f 4730 s -. 'a L1�aa(User5tWroue - 4730 - 20 aao:D Nat' Impact 8 "' .„ years) .,., woK �36re5 ar t ti+ y _ �..'. "'K 1 <. , �, �4•i%,'0i Syr `l,� e'4 :'l� - •Aiy fi 1 'i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -ELEMENT F rat CIE; Update. ,(Spr nq 989 ) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 4 825 PROJECT NAME: 20" WATER MAIN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD - LELY RESORT TO COUNTY BARN ROAD DESCRIPTION: 7920 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN } PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH MAPLES..• (1) (Planning D str ct Name) i RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY, DIVISIONS UTILITIES Unit of Measurements DEPARTMENTs..ADMINISTRATION 1988-94•Total Deficiencys_; ORGANIZATION:,.WATER Size of This Projects,. -•. FINANCIAL,•SUMMM!) . (=a-IN�THOUSANDS) Pre- j Sear: 1 -, Construction Land,..;,,',- Construction , Other Tota Prior ••988-89 rarocas u. . f1+t0 ear 49 541 ire Jert+l�u$ , VL 92 fix, .� � •, �� .,. s ' -77 CT,ON-FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS -- ES us Fir; Yeer:of Impact 89/90 LIFE i-TF Y, Cosei4r Unit t. + $.947 per L.F. Number. of Units; 7920 = i�1'1 sgzr, Gross Cost $ 7500 Less'•Usbr,.Revenue - 7500 F;(years Net. impact t } .'k ...jAam . _. __... ..... _...... .. _._.... ... .,-......�.�..���.. k' v 141 A .1 x i � - .R•r, [`M •�/, p "7" �" yS`w r � ��i� Q .�i refire CAPSTAL�IMPR ELEMENT _ First CIE Update;(Spr nq 1989) a, PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 826 i a PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN 6th STREET 91st AVENUE lllth'AVENUE ! DESCRIPTION: 6600 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES ( Plane nq D strict Name) Z' r RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY "I y • J. DIVISION: --UTILITIES i Unit of MeasuremaAt's" :ti"x�xVlc Wl�!f7�►b�I�fIBTRATICN l 1988-94``�otat`��f`nc�jit�`�� ORamZATION9, iiATER Size of This Pr6'fdcCj110XTA5Tt�,�;:.rt0 FINANCIAL `SUMMARY` ($ IN THOUSANDS) t - - r (. ,,' Pre- �fLana"-"I , r i� s" Construction Construction Other Tdta]; ior xv�x� , FoteCas °� • (j r,, taa;�a,:ccs� k �} �'vtr 20 . i"` 2251-91 �i92 93 f $ �204 XC1'r''ON7FtJTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ES2ikk EI $S -at, s.... } LIFE , Off' wa El"Flat of Impact 89/90ACIL7�TS�z « Cost per Unit i $ .493 �. Number of Units; 6600 - yeauo:u 4^' Less k tyiif IlZevenue ° $ 3254 30 GrossaWst �_- 3254 --.. _ , ., .. (YSa; .. :z Net,, Impact t ; ..Ny a 160K t?�6 rAsc 511 , Y: y i r sk 6 if l CAPITAL IMPROVEMEl.• ELEMENT' r First CIE -.Update ate (Spring 19891 PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ' TYPZ'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 8 827 At PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN GULFSHORE DRIVE - VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD DRIVE - 91st AVENUE IN NAPLES PARK DESCRIPTION: 12,585 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (D (Planning District Name) - RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DMSION:_.UTILITIES Unit of Measurements"' t�aDM't1tI6TRATZON '. ``;�,(, � 1988-94'�1'ort'a1Dit�fr�'�lanc�Sli�i�A�tSci ram., , 08GANIZATION:" WATER -! Size of This" Project': ' " •'''' t�liv',�^,; , 'FINANCf1�it.'� UMM7�1t '(f'JN THOUSANDS) Pre- ate '-Construction Land Construction O�er Total prior , � � � - Yc.::�a • 1988-09 Torecast; 54 595 „ • ,y'` r ff ram: <{ +i r �.�#�� �; r ro,�"�r a •nr,rr` 3�'y ' ' 'a"1' { 54 j ` 595 zsc:�€49► MPXdT*ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMAT '!i%SE (r. .i?,I'i LIFE ! ea ="af Impact :FE F xk'i CO#t _ _._ _.__ per Unit ! i .493 _tn x -7ao0C Number of Units : 12585 .Gross_Cost.,__- i i 6204 Les s.fuddr'Revenue - 6204 years ,. Nit.tmpact i ; _ ._ �orac�Ir •c. luj toot y.. y ♦rbr%�T b.r.i `LA"R, +Mew "�' > kr P.� s+ � w } '+;,' d 1*0 ' First CIE Update (Spring 9): ! t PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TY88�OF PUBLIC FACILITY: RAW WATER WELLFIELD PROJECT # 828 ' PROJECT _ NAME: CORAL REEF WELLFIELD - PRUE ; I .:. ; i ;, ._ •; `, 10 Tq: PROJECT LOCATION: 8&9 RURAL ESTATES CORRSG'REFI ){: O (Planning D str ct,Name IftfORSIBLZ AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY. DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement:;,,,,_ n DEPARTMENT:,,,,ADMINISTRATION.. 1988 94;Tota1. Defictenoy rt 2ATION: WATER Size of This Projects,, ,wP r,-r • FINANCIJIL;SUMMI1RYLjAj,;N THOUSUDS) n:i-•_.. Construction Land Constructon ,Other Tot 7^ or r c ©xxq 49, !'breCas i 7�a` �•90, 188 2066 , 5 Ali .E OPERATING BUDGETS _ +.. ,. s' ESTIMATEATuS r } LIFE , OF.-" wactt of Iip!! 9 0 /91 r .,r _, K tx.,c'A}�G T�I �' �x��'iM� �it. ;'i ._ •_ F tr. ��....e.MY^ f `����I,��%, ' �� . tY1. fib•' 'i".J,d�lttti: '- { e dross` Cost z . ' $ 114 74 _-- . Less-Vser Revenue - 114,747 rt9v Years a4sa ;r , et i: !..�..... . ....... {<�F77..1!rarh°k4i"lri��;�vfk ... .,. . b} Jif6'JP,""•..h.�iPt.__. CAPITAL r RROVEMENT ELEMENT First, CIR'VpdateL 'PR ECT'SLMKARY FORM KXF OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT # 829 PROJECT 'NAME:' -.-_NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT DESCRIPTIONt 8 MGD WATER PLANT PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES A -1 (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT_0N DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS UTILITIES Unit of Measurements Md/bjV'11 at mew bbAkb= i -- ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total D'dc"1eiicj' 11 a f ...... Size o This'Projectv 3.j!F0M"17',1 ORGl�EATION: WATER Net increase after adjust for loss of 3.0 MGD from City,of Naples and 1.25 MGD from the Glades FINANCIAL' SUMMARY'; ;IN THOUSANDS) - Yw Pre- —Construction Land Conitruction Othet Tota K !!89.,-: Cast'. 757 8328 90 hat lbpsa 7- -7r--9? r r m "OPERATING 'BUD GET S W. I" , act .90/91 U y au LIFE FACI; 4,j3 f,VnLts X,1 $ Ulu 732.900_____ 732.900 - .1odnWEI r BOOK 086PA"E514 t. i R .;• @ iir x, YT� , itt6ti .rr�+tz rr a�4� i JtA CAPITAL`IMOP R r F rst CIE U ate•, Spr ng.,1989)t" PROJECT SUMMARY FORM T)i?z.oF.PVBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM 0._830..., } ;; PROJECT -.NAME: 36" WATER MAIN - VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD TO..IMMOK&Uz ROAD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 216) DESCRIPTIONS 10,560 L.F. OF 36" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES ' (j) (Planning District Name) Sf ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY_, lip UTILITIES �.- 6nit at Measurementi;r; fflft%7dXZNTp ADMINISTRATION t, 1988-94 Total Deiiciencys -'Gast, ,;3:JpT/+N :GSAO O r r r ,•i.►tJ+ .i�ATER y'ize of This Projects, {'^ .. . , FINANCIAL�,SUMMARY..(= .ZN. THOUSANDS) i Pre- _-Construction Land. . Ca"tru'ctioti_. Prior 398=89 j eta-a$e -�0 cC OR-k8�3 o asY :20 +biiH It 116 .>A 1278 1� 92 Kxris b�'�' uTURE OPERATINGBuDGETSryt LIFE OFF t. .Yaar o!"Impact 90/91 F71CIiTX; CcstA per, unit $ .493 - : s tau 33 7 dmtty! Nuatiber, oi��Tnits _ 10 66 �t _csaO `ataxp G31'!7s='`COij ; 5 Z06� �: ! Lass tfserRe�venue r Years; .t6. Ir ' Q3f ►Alid 15 { GOOK � M �•: CAPITAL IMPRCrVL+'MENT'•.ELEME�JT� .� � First CIE Update (Spring 989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT A 831 r fr " PROJECT NAME: 36" WATER MAIN - IMMOKALEE ROAD- NORTH CO. ' REG. WATER TREAT PLANT TO CR 951 (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 215) DESCRIPTION: 10,560 L.F. OF 36" WATER MAIN t PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES j (t) (Planning. D str ct Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DMSIONs--UTILITIES i Unit of Measurement '� DEPARTMENTil )bMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total'Deficiencyi3�� =Asxuo ,Size of This Pro f �tiu qq e FINANCIAL!SUD61kR '''(;SIN THOUSANDS) <" Pre- .r ' ' 'xi►r `� C'onstiiiction' Lnd'na. Co astrucficn ` ?'O other Tot` Prior 9 I ! 00-Qlei ptidget, ear a apba3 , X •YY €;' 116 1 , :� 1278 2 t 9•92 92 93 j i E2 1278 ,i,f"139 t A`rdN`FvTURE OPERATING BUDGETS "r` q ' ;'.' LSTIk1lT `VsErm 1 �'"-of Impact 9Q/91- _ 13LIFE OF Tip F ` l��a i ° + ° arc; rFAC:ft* Cds ,Ver,Unit I S .493. _ _... lit Numbet, of .Units' 10,560_ a�xc'tf .3t9ilirwY: - 5.206 LeWNW-revenue - _ 5.206 yea Net`Impact i $ rs) v ry ^ ' i00K PAGE SL ,�y,, „ a ljsx,�;.:✓�r/ s,n« R r�f� CAPITAL •IMPROVEMENT -ELEMENT•, r e " r•"��? kA""` First CIE Update,(Sprinq 989) ; ` PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r4lW Of PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM -,--PROJECT #,832..pi F PROJECT NAME: 24" WATER MAIN - IMMOKALEE ROAD - CR 951 •:� i •, . , . TO WOODLANDS PUD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 214) DESCRIPTION: 7920 L.F. OF 24" WATER.MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES (A) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 4.. DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement:-• DEPARTMENTsr:. ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 . Total . Deiiciencysa• --,y ZATION:.WATER • I size of This Projects;;-.-'•� . , _ FINANCIAL SUMMARY $ IN THOUSANDS) •w R Pre- Ye}t Construction Land Construction -Other Total Prior. Z98$ 89 ForaCas n q BuQQAf . ar 1 Iry „� pbltiH •91 558 9 �93y =� TQtai. i 51 558 1b609 -` ; FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESi"IMASEFU . ter.. st.�feas :ef Impact 90 / 91 r f'ACZLITY ► ; Cos'Vdit _ 493 Number of Units 7920 Gross Cost ; 3905 .10 fxss'19s4r�Revenue - 3905 -_ __ :1,..,(yeass Fy ' �; (IIG CAPITAL IMPR ELEMENT r: = First CIR,U ate;(Spz nU-1989) J,f PROJECT SUMMARY'FORM' , ` TYPE.OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 833 PROJECT NAME: 20" WATER MAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD - WOODLANDS PUD TO QUAIL. CREEK PUD (MASTER PLAN.PROJECT NO. 212) DESCRIPTION: 5280 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN #9=CT LOCATIONS 8 RURAL ESTATES (D (Planning District Name) MPWSIBLL► AGENCY IMPACT'ON DEFICIENCY. DIVISIONS UTILITIES Unit of Measurements. DBPa1tTMENT ADMINISTRATION :'T 1988-94 Total Deficiency;.. I..J,(. MI YIVw. .. ...• - . . L.. .. 1. Ii�,AP� [...u. � ti iORGANIZATION&_WATER Size of This Projects..l � iR � ,.. --.. __• FINANCIALSUMMARY;�I#;:YN•fif�OUS'ANDS) -,r, r i Pre- Construction Land Construction Total ,T, , er = r or Forecas i 4 -�,- t - CAB -Heat 989-90l ar I ' 28 j 308 .3.. ft 93 IL 28 __ _ 308 c V ,FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS EST�MXTED'VSEFU oa�of Impact COWier-Unit ' $ 90/91 .493 r , FACILITY_ ° . n Number of Units; 5280 Gross Cost ; 603 Less User, Revenue - Not act'. _ 2603 _. _ _ .._ __ �. (years) z . a S,1 k<, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT - Frr—st CIE Update (Spr-rn-g 1-989) PROJECT'SUMMARY FORM TYPZ'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 834 PROJECT NAMES 16" WATER MAIN QUAIL CREEK PUD - IMMOKALEE ROAD TO WATER, TANK (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO.' 211) DESCRIPTIONS 7920 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES (D (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION v UTILITIES Unit of Measurement:' "iDMINISTRATION j 1988-9 'Total'Defidiencyr ft-WATER ZATION's Size of This Pro I �4 FINANCIAt"SUMMARYJIN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Lana' Construction Other Tot lor ea -am j 34 375 71111 Wei. 2 SOT 3 4 Mviie"aPof IMP Cost Tier unit ilikd6er of UnitS Gros;�-63i:__i Less, Gek'Reven6 90-Impact—_ i A 34 IE OPERATING BUDGETS U A. fbqimi4 M.!*'*SEM 11" 90/91 .493— 7920- - - 3905- 3905 r,--, (ye .!!rs -1v �J -,• f, r'+f r�Gi+t�..l�i��,. �6R ,x[ b o „t�xli d , t p�arP "� ; �� w F rst,CIE Update, -(Spring 1989� PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 835 PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD - QUAIL CREEK PUD TO OAKS BLVD. (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 202) DESCRIPTION: 2640 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 899 RURAL ESTATES CORKSCREW M (Planning District Name RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY _ ` DIVISION:..UTILITIES Unit of Measuriment:- tC 2I , DEPARTMENTi ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 04, ` ORGMIZATIONi'WATER Size of This Prof CtzvUlx�' DSO FINANCIAL•SUMkMd f IN THOUSANDS) 1 Pre - Cal i '1�"• ,7 I r Construction `Land`'' Conatriictfoa _ ' Other T'cLa Prior. -a i988-89 Fb-iinQ r ForecastE ; + xsoaxc! Bridget ear .4 r ` 1 11 125, . 'A At h� l �'oai 11 125 ,b !►L`T ON -'FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTiMAT£D USEFUi LIFE -OF Firs''£_•i ie i of Ii pact 90/91 Il Cost per Unit + t .493 _.__.._ = ilea z�4 zeo:) Number of Units 2640 . __-_._.__... al iZU .�o :ndm Jil . Gloss. ost :: f $ 1302 fu2'6 a1:01D toad, - 1302 • - -• year Net Ampact ' _ .1fig J (; j 10� 520 k gV'n 1.14 ir w; ' CAPITAL -IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT t First CIE Updata : Spr nq 9. 9) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM C. TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 836 PFOJECT,NAME:.12" WATER MAIN IMMORALEE ROAD.- OARS BLVD. TO.,LIVIHGSTONE ROAD EXT. (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO.•184) ; DESCRIPTION: 5280 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN ; PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES r # Of (Planning District Name) y, -RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES , Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMErtT ADMINISTRATION _. 1988-94.Total;Deficiencyr ,16 ORG7�ifIZATION= .fiATER Size of This Projects .�»w::► k. FINANCIALs, SUMMARY,,($ -IN THOUSANDS) r Coastruction iLand ,,: Con:truction� ; O her Tota .. _ t F9 sssils;� or�cas } rA'dl ad a3 -9t' 43+ 12 136 12 4 136 a U rURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIM?►Tl.Dq pSEFUL n LIFE OF tt Tear7of Impact �os'per= Veit I ; 90/91 . 1 ICA FACIL17Y.1.t'3 493 IQU�ber'ofs: Unit 5280 Growcost S 2603 (`[peer'.. evenue - 2603 Net µImpact . t 4 �# 036PAISE CAPITAL IMPROVEKENT-ELEMENT. First CIE Update Spr nq 1989)! "PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 837 }« PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN LIVINGSTONE ROAD EXT. - IMMOKALEE ROAD.TO OLD 41 (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 169,170,171,255) DESCRIPTION: 23,600 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES a=; (D (Planning District Name) i RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY UTILITIES- Unit of Measurements MPADMINISTRATION I 1 1988-94,1otal Defiai.encpi:,, ZATIONr. WATER Size of This Projects-.,!---,,- (ROK! ,'FINANCIAL-SUMMARY?.(t,IN THOUSANDS) k Pre- YeaY_ � se, i-:Xonstructicn Land;,,, Construction .Other Total FOrecas ti• �.i+d7. a kr. .un -91 101 ` 1116 t 1999-94 �R ,• �y 101. ! " ! 1116.r 7'- 11CT: f FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS zii; i F ism aL 5 j'1 IFS TZMATgLl ytjS ~~ !ar"abf 3pact 90/91 Cost :per _ Unit t 49 �- �� y ►� �.:.. NLmber of Units 23600� cross Cost $ 11635 Less Uxer,Reven e - 11635 _ b Ne acts;� t � k _ r� w , �� !, - BOOK � PAGE •� -.sal+ i.n.. ? y •$ Yy1 xx i �J11 � •H CAPITAL RMLOVEME -ELEMENT, First CIE,Update:> Spr nq 939) PROJECT SUMMARY FORD r.: TYPE%OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT #-839.'; ?; �•- PROJECT NAMEt,16" WATER MAIN OLD-41 - LIVINGSTONE ROAD TO US 41/OLD 411 TANK (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 167) i ":ELEVATED STORAGE DESCRIPTION: 1800 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN r PROJECT LOCATION: I NORTH NAPLES (0) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY t IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY, DSION;.,_.UTILITIES ! Unit of Measurementsx '�T.' PIPARTMENTrir- ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Defieiencyt ZATION:! WATER: :=- Size of This Projectfr T ate Ian r FINANCIAL SUMMARY. (_ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- i s YX� { ,) �onstruction Land :: Construction : + Oter : 'rot ; prior f .:ot: n cis tr Bttdgst ear '�• 1t3 ' q l> �` + M MiL r.+ S+r 4 Cost per :Vnit - f b*UWAr of Unitsf Gross cost i E OPERATING BUDGETS C; : ; ;', '.::::' U . ESTIMATED ,i US ;; LIFE OF t 90/91rI iG- FACILITY: 11 .71_ 9 per L.F.,,I �lnfac'� 1800 S 9 Lisst'fthser�Revenue - (years) =- Net Impact ; aC p r �lf.Y �f,�. m :...r��:t, .ti.�f, S"e11�1i'.� r?6,.P' � +• i•. +i� , k . i 14, 14 11• 'f ..'� � }•.p�, ^i yid TKP +' First CIE Update -:(Spring 89) ' PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ,�. TYPE'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION" SYSTEM '.'.-PROJECT #',840,"'� �- PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN PINE RIDGE ROAD - LIVINGSTONE ROAD TO VINEYARDS PUD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NOS. 302,303) {"�.. DESCRIPTION: 7920 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN y _ !.' PROJECT LOCATION: 2L8 CENTRAL NAP LES/RURAL ESTATES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY. p,SIONt ,, UTILITIES ; Unit of Measurea►ent"sr1i DZ�14RT�!IENTr ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total' DeficiencytT=_gA1 3C ZATi0N:t;iiATER' ... °�� Size"Lof This Projecti:a i r FINANCIAL SUMMARY:: $ IN THOUSANDS) } � Pre- i ' i = Construction Landr.e._ Conatructioa j Ole ther Tota Prior . i .vtY4 �98Q-89, a PIZ BtidQet ear f + bP-eSnt, 34 375 III±S409 92 93 t ' £:• 34 i 375 , t' XZdN:F6TURB OPERATING BUDGETS P'Tjli_'.q`Ms;!"!' E STz MPLTRVIIUSEFU<< LIFE or ri Yiar"of impact 91/92' :-FACILITY I`1 Cost per Unit t 493-. .� xwq.4zc Ncimber. of; Units; 7920 a�irtti'.>la<ior.uM $ 3905 sew.Revenue - 3905 -.:: �:, a c (years )w� 9.► NlE Impact � s - � »ngr.7l ya•.�� • #OAK ro �r r s �, I ., ,• �3 � ti � x+ �,, +la Yr � 4 r i + µ Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM — _ TYPE'OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT-8 841 PROJECT NAMES 16" WATER MAIN DAVIS SLVD. FOXFIRE PUD TO GLADES WATER t TREATMENT PLAN (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 417)' ' DESCRIPTIONS 6450 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN - - PROJECT"LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES ._.. (t) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DMSIONs UTILITIES Unit of Measurements DEFARTMENTe ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: . ,.. r + .-. ���. 1. Y.`lr ,i .I.J t •: 1 . i{'t4+J1 i .. iri,,,'.+ j,M z4, �EATIONs WATER � Size of This Project: .1.7t%w :"r:v_.. nJr►1Js¢i :V FINANCIAL summ .ty. (;-IN-THOUSANDS r-- --- - ----� �tear� �_�..- Pre- Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 988-f89 I Yc+�.S Budget Y ar I fl�•eBL r` . � � 1 •ipyfJ4QI ,+ 9 =92 27 j 304 331 ' r ACT ON'FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS--: SEFUZ AA F rs �Yearof Impact 91/92 FACILITY. Cows'=Utfit } $ .493 -" __._._:_. _ :i '3e- 7sflX. Jit•:1 Number of Units 6450 :rat! t9q, C Gross Cost ! S 3180 c+ 20 -•;r ", Less_Usar.Revenue - 3180 (years) r v fi •., ,-._,. shy t,. 5§ ����'{ r 4 r CAPITAL iMPROVEMENT'EEI�ENT"', First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM . -OF-PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ..PROJECT..#_.842_..-...__...i PROJECT NAME: 5 MG GROUND STORAGE TAM -AND PUMPING FACILITIES AT COLLIER DRI (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. GTS-4,.PS-5) DESCRIPTION: . PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (#) ( Planning .D str ct. Name) { -y RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements _Al DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION ; 1988-94eTotal Dekiciency: fax . bRCANiZATION! WATER i '? b; N(7ITeziillrUfid Size of This pro�Recti FINANCIAL,SUMMARY,..($-IN_THOUSANDS) J jwjwdl',. � xr. Pre- j ;. , { =� ..Construction ._Land _.Coastruct.oa_ { prior. � mow. 89 I �s-888 ,..4. Fo"recast 8td 'Y ar j. 1 92j 123 r F t 1348 x% r 123 %ITrSPACT,ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED )SEItI ' •{.1 II 3LIFSg;O?v-1 F rat Year of Impact 91/92 j;,�'ACILITYzn� Cost: per Unit r t _ - , - Number of, Units: 1. fi r. u ao z9d�sw s G'ross�Cos£} t 873 9�P� z�o sue' Less ' Vier 'Revenue - 87377 IrM6s ' 600K M r, i'� Y ;iP '• w 1 �+ N i'I{�1 P Pd 7 CAPITAL YMF�td�TEP3EN1`':LtT First CIE,Update-(Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMARY FORM TYPE'0? PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT 8 843,°; PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN AT PINE RIDGE ROAD - J & C INDUSTRIAL PARK DESCRIPTION: 8000 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN - PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES,' c :J3t.ty:. O (Planning District Name) i RESPONSIBLE AGENCY = J IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY' :,Iei12v!t :Sri DIVISION: -UTILITIES ( Unit of Measuiiii fiis tic3T^1' G '=TMENt 4iiMlkSTRAT1ON' `'� 1988-94 26tal,bif18ienC4PMTV,VTG „r 1wv1.,ZATI&6:f'-'> "TER Size of This #=SjectlNOTTAS U,'-).q0 ' FINANCIAL • SUMkM& _ ($ IN THOUSANDS) I Pro - 'Construction f t mnd.rs16. Construction' Other Total Prior, i xoiYq �88 89 f 50 j C C a a, -a u FOrecas fia�saYo3 ;' �4- 0• 278 , �O,Q4(278: �etti I mar. ,�t•''J i�btc r . A a; .:'01 278 AC''s2 OPERATING BUDCiETs �;::iTi>? y0 3?UIS'��5�1.SSEFU1;k x. r?i�I3 LIF$ OF Fir ,filiPof' =1act 89/90. ``" "=` _ 1cFACZtITYA'� COst:per Unit $ .493 _: __ __ 7ir.U,xaq,..7ac0 Number Qf Xnitai a000 _ . _ . a71nu a xedmtl y dross -Coat ! $ 3944_�% _ 22T)jabiv Lesst ft6k., kevente - 3944 (years Net; Impact $ sosgm. BOOK Q36PAGE5rwu ` t y yj rS�%.Yt.!4.�s'•,�.ilylr. 1• �?�1h..,.aX, j5 i r ., �'�L�t,:r i' CAPITAL IMP ROVFTTENT- ELEMENT First CIE Update, S r n �'• p q; 1989)- " PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE.OT PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ;.PROJECT #,844 ,+c PROJECT NAME:•20" WATER MAIN AT PINE RIDGE ROAD US 41 TO J i C INDUSTRIAL PARR "e DESCRIPTION: 2800 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN > ! PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES. n' y, "` y= (4) (Pi anninq:District'Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES._i Unit of MeasurementsA�.,< • T&rAZ)KINISTRATION_ + 1988-94 Total Aefi ire " X��� = ,' ..' •.-. ." ft,4 � h -.9 L Z< svy..lf •(a� A, f Z1lTIONi1r,WATER airiT ?o ziB Size of This�Prp Oct, ` �' • < +gq, ;,FINANCIAL..*SVMM]�RY,� (;, IN THOUSANDS)�� a Pre- %'yConstruction, ,� __� T.and, Cononatruct�on ; yOt er, TO Uta Prior t 8-89_ 30 Forecas y c ..• may. �4< � ' 30 8r . 166 9c s waf �!g4Qlj2FdTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ..�i?iAisO �nV1 ESIMA "�: VIJ . { Lift dF F F t1$WZof Impact 89/90 ru 7rS " tisU , Numbs Cost nits l 2800 r _-_`---•_ 77 > '► ���`�$�'''� wr. Gros ; $ 1380 -- � s1 :rntrpJ , M1 , cevenue - 1380 ` Hi a ,, _ __ _ _ _ - �c►va� Year�a ae;i x ._. +pal �: •74 f.'�� t R � 6 toot - aT t,,u ! .'t i ELEMENT w. first CIE�UpdateASprinq 1989) PROJECT -SUMMARY-FORM TYPE ?OF PUBLIC:FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION..SYSTEM --PROJECT 9 846:- sj PROJECT_NAMEt 12" WATER MAIN AT -US 41:-•YANDERBILT BEACH ROAD TO;.- PELICAN BAY ENTRANCE (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 161) +' DESCRIPTION: 6000 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN 4. PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (i) (Plana n4 D str ct Name) t ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY•. •J D ONN: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements; DVA1Fi s�j ADMINISTRATION`: fy i t 1988-94; Tota1; Deiiciancp:s �A K ILZATIONtI.WATER Size of This Projects;()* r ; .: t21tiL•' FINANCIAL-.BVMMARZ (: IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Yeajrt;_ xar o Construction (Land:ns: Construction;. Other Total 1 L 1988-89 ! ►a�abct Cost�per Unit *caber of Uni Gross ,Cost Not'Impa •& w*OL zas ' 4 n. g,y�y y7 ��i ^'"ff ��� �•�1 r Z�r f1j�7lF �� 205 ! i �t 0, 19 205 in 5 8 OPERATING BUDGETS $STIMIITMIM S LIFE ° OF.;.. t 93/94 t, Eq: Y 3F1►C=�I?tzi _ .493 6000 - 29 8 , ,, (years), S 4'•1'� ... ror �,A '��? .!R, , r f ;c .;� �i��.P,� :.�i?4•�+ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Updator(Spr ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM y _TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT { 847 *• PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN AT IMMOKALEE ROAD - AIRPORT ROAD TO WWIP ENTRANCE ROAD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT No.-175) DESCRIPTION: 5280 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES ,k (N) (Planning District Name) y, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:. UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENTi `ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION:'WATER Size of This Projecti= ''•` FINANCIAL SUMMARY'(: IN THOUSANDS) Pre- s: ,. Ydai Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior i#.I` 1988-89 I Forecast Sudget 40ar 9 0-91� M911-92 I =r93 16 9=94 *tal 1 1 16 1 1 UIZ"' IMPAtVON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Firitt2$ear'of Impact 93/94 Cost per Unit $ 493 Number of Units 5280 Gross. Cost. . $ 2603 Lesi Usek:Revenue - _ 2603 Not Impact I S 180 180 1 se -tee. EP=sisr e ~ 1801 ♦� } i 196 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF j FACILITY:: . a 20 r years) ;. CAP:TAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spr ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM 2 OF PUBLIC FACILITY* WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 848 PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER V�61N AT US 41 - PELICAN BAY ENTRANCE, TO PINE RIDGE ROAD ,WATER MASTER PLAN NO. 191) DESCRIPTION: 8300 L.F. Cr 12" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (i) (�Zlanning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONs UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Def iqiency:.z%, ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Project: FINANCIAL :, SUMMARY; ($.-1N THOUSANDS) Pre- Year.-, Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 9 8-89 Forecast 'ye a t 9 2 26 283 26 283 ejlr MPACT-0K7UTURE OPERATING BUDGETS- ESTIMATED USZFUL LIFE OF rlrst*As A' Impa t c 94195 $ .493 1COW,'psr'Vnit ftr. of Units 8300 Gross Cost $ 20 4092 (years) Net'Impact $ tl SOCK WAGE _ CAPITAL -IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (SpriiTg 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: RAW WATER WELLFIELD PROJECT 4 849 PROJECT NAME: NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WELLFIELD PHASE II (MASTER PLAN I PROJECT NO. NRW-2) all= DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY D M SION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements- DIPARTHWTVADMINISTRATION Vt: 1988-94 Total NfJbJ!&hcyrT?1f,^,"Al0 ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Projects' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year, Construction Land Construction Other TotaV"! PrIor 198 8-89 Forecast vwget Yeat pit 7JD6us froo-91 t42 ; 092 9 ADD L94 k. vlr� 344 3441-ILIS I T66LY 31 344 375 "SlVbWACT ON' FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS fiist'Wain-of impact LIFE OF FACILITY Cost per unit $ Number of Units Gross -Cost._ $ 20 rl Less - User,'Revenue (years) - t $ v3t! 533, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (SprTnigI989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPZ OF PUBLIC FACILITY: RAW WATER WELLFIELD PROJECT t 850 1PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD EXPANSION (MASTER PLAN PROJECT No. SRW-2) DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES (D (Planning District Nam;) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: - DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: X ORGANIZATION:. WATER Size of This Project:. FINANCIAL SU11MARY. (S IN THbUtARbtV__'_ Pro - Year Construction Land Construction other Total Prior 1988-89 Forecast 1189-90 Bu'dast ear 9 0-9 I 1901-92.' ii9i-93 ti } N 140 i ;140 Future 1535 535 dotal t 140 1535 ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED,.USEM LIFE '07 Y r I -ear; of Impact FACILITY, Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ L699'V-ser-,Revenue .--Iyears) Net ,impact $ BOOK PACE 2 64 . ; A, g .;, C PITAL IMPR ELEMENT First CIE Update Spr ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPB_OF PUBLIC FACILITY: RAW WATER BOOSTER STATION PROJECT 851 Adr—PROJECT STATION NAME-. RAW WATER BOOSTER �&SCRIPTION s _ . Y,. PROJECT LOCATION: COUNTY -WIDE (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY bIVISIONs -UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENTS ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiencys 4 OROANIZATION3 WATER Size of This Projecti' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- i4ar Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior ( t Forecast� 1989-90 90 360 -4501 :� Budget Year V i 90-91 i f. I 1 91-92I 3-94 90T7 360 ' }' %MpACT.ON FUTURE OESTIMATED USEFUL OPERATING BUDGETS LIFE OF Fir t'Year'of Impact 90/91 FACILITY' Cost per Unit t ' Number. of Units Gross; Cost $ _ 77052 _ 20 -_ A Less User Revenue - 77052 (Years) �«r Net Xmpact. $ - _ ;yam nq y BOOK V36 PArc 535 r e��t Ei:xRili~bRCIGYATIOIQ OF QROJBCTS(TO 1989 44 "09rldi9fty �ati-ol . . • no 1REgT1w ftws NORTH MINTY Aj rI •.. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANOAItDs; 10018lO1CAFIIA PLUS 212 NON-RESIDENTIAL c�.. FMTIQlt 0 N60 w stNt1 m ; VALUE OR •„ FISCAL MINTY REQUIRES PLANKED AVAILAILE (OEFICIENCV) (COST) At sTEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000121 IN CIP 43,057,040 ss. 11,tei,"17-11 22131 2.7 2.5 (0.201 ;- fi11,4011 23621 2.1 2.5 (0.40) : jI,222 lI0 25127 3.0 2.1 4.5 1.50 :.4583,5i0 "-t1 f 26626 3.2 4.5 1.30 ,0 3,174,152 28124 3.4 4.5 : 1.10 „ 3,362,744 -? d1 0.i t 1i-1/ 21i23 Siitl 3.6 3.{ 2.0' 1.3 . ..: � • ` i.3 ;; . ; � . ml t 06S 411 '''•P ' ' 2.7t }P., � 1,2SI,OOt • - i 12„t l4-1S� t U681 . 4.0 i.i 2.50.,,.}p 71642,601 ,Cl VS iN, ►1tt t 34rA 4.1 - 4.5 2.40 ,•, 7,336,A96 qw- } P,t 35121; 4.3 97-tt' = my 4.5 i.S', i, 2.01• O,1U,010 �. ` "'t'� tl-1!•- 3E954 4.T i.S ' :• l.N�,;� St302,6T2 "-00 40321 4.1 nNLAT10N NS1 K60 ROD IURPLUs! VALUE OR MISTY REDUIRED PLAma AVAILAILE QUIC1EW) (C051) AT - wr;. UK P3101 SERVICE AREA 111/CAPITA ix Cl► -., ;f;,O57,040 t 4 1I ♦. G: •�rlor» .; •. asn , J law 1•� m �.f 1EAR IWTOIAL 21110 5-1R SOM VEAR TOTAL t4l ..' 25127 3.0 2.0 4.5 7361 1.0 2.4 2.0 326H 4.0 4.0 7835 0.1 0.0 0.0 40321 4J 4 1 =536 f O 0 y 1 (0.V1 12,751,336) '4'"1,214 L'• • Ri .1• f :x s Y48CONCILIATION OS PROJECT3,TO 1988-94:DE1'ICIENCX ' 1 �0•APr•lt , ^: .�,:j,"�• ' SEMER 1REATIT�lf1 PLAKTt SOUiN CO{A(11' �j7- LEVEL OF SERVICE STAN1AROt 106/SPO/CAPI7A PLUS 211 NON-RESIDENTIAL ' POPULATION NSI 0 NO SURPLUS/ VALUE OR r' F: COUNTY REQUIRED PLANMED AVAILABLE (DEf1CIENCYI IMS71 AT Y-AR SERVICE AILA 0.000121 IN CIP f3,051,040 d'' It1 '� ,.p-p i 48083 S.t 3.1 •I2.61_._"_17,t4l,3041 3v , fWff 51227 6.2 1.3 :: 12.11 53311 6.5 3.3 (3.21 s: 0,712,5281 ; 913411 4.1 4.7 1.1 1.2 ^.:; 3,W,441 ,,iA = '8 !1•f2 "m 7.0 1.0 1.6 ;.. , 31057,040 t ��',0r8 V2-l3 C 60602 7.3 4.0 12.0 4.1 ,o_ yU,361,011 r t c M1irSbe,[ VS•tl o 12f46 7.6 12.04.4 ;q_;f13,450,t76 ' :" if1,d i, i Vi-tS J 6mi 1.0 12.0 1.0 fq__? 12,221,160 1S-t6 60865 1.3 s 12.011,111,041 tq r,011,232 toe* ; 17-t )- 7471 1 1.0 r'3 12.0• 3.0:p.g tr171, 29 t �t49,1 1114 ' 71744 f.1 12.0 7.141,301 t "� tt4'10704 9.1 12.0 ' 2.2:_,a ' 6,725,401 • 4 ' IA POPULATION me N61 m SURPLUS/ VALUE ON COIAttY REQUIRED KANO AVAILABLE I1EF1C1ENCY1 (COST) AT !+ Ilk itAlOI SERVICE AREA 121/CAPITA 11 CIP 13,037,049 , MIX R, TO 4 , 'ti130'1t0 SSS71 6.S 0.0 3.3 I3.21 at,7fi2,S2/1 r` � ,tE11R iRC1TN .. `10/10• m 1233S 1.5 1.7 1.1 TERN MiTAL L5106 1.0 .1.7 12.0 4.0 W,il.l60 }S•TI 147" 1.1 .0.1 ..�SOI,i721 I001 9111 �:: •. �:�.. r'tR?+ii F.1- ':."fir y r YEAR �At - 1 .16 �a" 10704 1.1 0.7 12.0 2.2.7 o it 6P12S,41/ { : v •.. Gu •.>..aF141 f tr b a; . • aoOK 036 Pqr � 7 RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS -TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY r SEVER TREAT1W PLANTt CEKTRAL COUKTI LE OF S8(V10E STANDARDt fOOIGPDItAPITA PLUS 21.11 NON-RESiO£KTIAL POPULATIDK in No Its SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL CDUNTI REQUIRED PLANNED AVAIUKE IDEFIC)ENCT) ICOST) AT YEAR URVICE AREA 121 19 tip f3,031,010 "-11 till 0.2 0.0 (0.21 (518,9711 N-11 1701 0.2 0.0 6.2) . (0,2031 I9-11 _; 1703 0.2 0.0 (0.2) (159,5351 �u%;. to-1I 1163 0.2i � 11-12 1141 0.2 0.0 (0.21 (720,561) 12-13, 2030 0.2 0.0 (0.21 (750,9011 ° 13-14 2112 0.3 0.1 (o.sl': 1 t "gn;I311 � _.14-0_ 2211 0.3 0.0 (0.31 • (t11,7021 2320 0.3 • -•-+ •�.•-..- (-VH7. _._ 2421. 0.3 0.0 (0.31 096,6421 17-11 2521 0.3 1.0"' _- _ 0.31 - c13S,u:1- tls T 11-1! : 2in 0.2 f 0.0, 10.3) 1l73sB21 2736 _ 0.3 4.0 0.3) (1,012,0311) •:. POP)RJITIOK N o NDO w SURPLUS/ VALUE OR: y � Cie COUKTT REQUIRED PUNNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT 1UE. PERIDS SERVICE AREA N 121/CAPITA IN CIP w ^Y� - 01,057,04o': fa ,� PNEIEII, T1 f: r .•' 1 - r 7<,: tint" 1713 o.2 0.0 0.0 .(0.2) (631,5351 5 VEAi WIN lon"m 433 0.1 0.0 1.0 :10.11 (161,111) S-YEAO SINTOTAL 2216 0.3 0.0 0.0 ' (0.3) (111,1021j r 20 511 iR m 520 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.11 (112,3401, ". ; 10� i0illl __., ^7u:11:Z �•3r 1I > �;; R�� fond-lroo nx o.s 0.0 t i fir. r: • 14 V 1. CAPITAL jmwomrrmrN" rrrururp First CIE Update Spr nq 1ff9) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT # 901 PROJECT NAME: EXPANSION OF NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER FACILITY AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES O (Planning Dist RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DZVISIONs UTILITIES Unit of Measurements :.'-.MGD DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiehct: 1.3 ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This,Projectt',"-�? 2 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year.— Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 500 Soo 1988:-89-. 5195 5195 -4 Forecast- All ILY39-90 Budget Year tt ^T 199041 1991?!92 Ayn of t VP 17, I 1 ,1992!-93 HOP`, lr94 fttttre To , tai 500 5195 5695 ,-'IMACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL, "• LIFE OF rst Year of Impact 89/90 FACILITY - Cost per Unit $ 643/MG Number of Units Groxx Cost $ 916635 20 L Lexx User Revenue 916635 (years) 4 Not Impact rloL A,.E53 . Pvt w 4a• .�' p� X 'r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT A 902 .""- PROJECT NAME: EAST AND SOUTH NAPLES SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM —DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 2 4 5 CENTRAL/EAST/SOUTH NAPLES M (Planning District Name) t 4 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY _ IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: *w DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:, ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project:. ------ FINANCIAL (=.IN THOUSANDS) -SUMMARY Pre- ? Year Construction Land Construction Other Total.` 1764 1988-89 Forecast) 1989=90 1 20522 .20522* Budget Year •1990-91 jj � :, 1 9Ai 92 Sly-tE'!'i H is 3=94 °� Future * Does not include expected grant of ;4,927,00 } Total----•t-- _ _ 1764 20522 sit ✓-~IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED,U9EFULi LIFE " `OF" 1 " First'Year of Impact 90/91 FACILITY.. Cost--&t,Unit $ 1.68 L.F. j s y� Number of Units 369000 Gross Cost t 620650 20 Less..Usbr Revenue - 620650 (years Net impact i � r IT :0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT 904 M PROJECT NAME: SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (Planning District Name) i.RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: LTILITIES Unit of Measurement: MGD DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION .1988-94 Total Deficiency: 4.3 ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: 4.7 FINANCIAL SUMMARY .($.IN. THOUS�MS), Pre- - ; Construction Land Construction other. Total;! iftok 1002 Soo 11006 1988-89 Forecast i budget Year 1991-92 111Z Aii-93 i En sect 9 -94 93 Mu f —re 1002 500 11006 - T i Ti 12S08_ 1I 4' J I'tMPACT 'ON. FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL] A First 'YeAr of Impact 90/91 Cost per Unit $ 426/MG LIFE -, OF FACILITY 1g, Number of -Units $ 1244100 20 Less User Revenue - 1244100 (years) Net _.;m I pact_.. $ - BOOK PAGE 541' I CAPITAL IELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989)_ x PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PROJECT # 906 PROJECT NAM: UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: UNKNOWN AT PRESENT _.._ (i) (Planning District Name) r RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY '. DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: , 14 ..._. .__._.-_ . _. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- ; f ear j Construction Land Construction Other Total' !Par 1988-89 ( 100 100 YorecastM. A�pp�r? 3'i�9:90 1060 1060 Qet Y ar 4e_nRi': 0=91 t7, 8 iw rh�� r k 2-93 3-94 Total -- . -_.... ioo 1060 1160 ACT'ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Fes- iear'of Impact 90/91 ESTIMATED USEFUL FACILITY } a .-1 Cos t°per Unit $ dumber of units Gross Cost ; 46225 ' 20 '• ' Less -User -Revenue 46225 Net tiapact t - (years):. EUX BOOK PAST 542 _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spr n9. 989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER TREATMENT PLANT AND PROJECT A 907 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT NAME: SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER PUMP STATION, j TRANSMISSION MAINS AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 2/4/5 CENTRAL EAST, SOUTH NAPLES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ` Y a r)III OR MUTION: WASTEWATER Size of This Projects 1 FINANCIAL SUNaSARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) ' Pro - Construction Land. Construction. Other..-..--Toa� Y Prior 1133 500 18116 ; I574911988-89 t . Yorecast1989-90 Budget Year S 196-91 r . �1 02 ! to-5821 92-93 y' ! ra I vJi)^i Total- -=----_. __ .1133 500 _ . .18116 ...._. I__ __.19141 �{ IMPACT -ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEF" f �•; t •. LIFE .•.Op . . First Year of Impact 90 91 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 1.68 FT PIPE „ Number 'of Units 89040 . rr. Grow -Conti $ 150000 .20 ,c... Less User Revenue - 150000 years - -- Net- Impact $ _ BOOK 036 PASE 3 Ji First CIE Update (Spring 19891 ` PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT # 908 xy j PROJECT NAME: 8" FORCE MAIN - PUMP STATION NO. 15 TO PUMP STATION NO. 20 DESCRIPTION: 10,800 L.F. OF 8" FORCE MAIN t 's. PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (i) (Planning District Name) ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY a' DIVISION: --UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: #�y DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ll-F 6MMIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: "''"' " ` FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- "' �t`• „, ' Construction Land Construction Other- _Total Prior 1988-89i r -90) r '` Budget Year' i 1991-92 �' tip, i. ,� C , I99rr2-93 it 94� i { 712 ? f p_r�i1� r • t Future otal ..�...__ . _ . 65 _ .712 _ L_._ . _.A7T , ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATRD`'�1SEFU� Or lirst~Year.of Impact 93/94 LFACILITY.- Cost per Unit $ 1.68 Per L.F. Number. of Units 10800 ' ! .: Gross,-tbst__._... $ 18159 7 20 ,r Lost'Veer Revenue - 18159 years) Net -Impact $ seat � U36 5 44, a CAPITAL IMPRgYR= ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1939) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT # 909 PROJECT NAME: 12" FORCE MAIN PUMP STATION NO. 19 TO PUMP STATION I NO. 20 DESCRIPTION: 11,300 L.F. OF FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES" (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements, DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:,, 11!7 ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of,This Project:_ FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other Tota P_3: , 1988-89i 1989-90, i Budget Year 4 FG 107 e'oe 091-921 A2-93 -94 1177 tur 107 I 1177 I ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS tftie;W 1. ESTIMATM_:U1trft '.,�CT.* tirsk.Year of Impact 93/94 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 1.68 per L.F. Number of units 11300 Gross Cost $ 19002 Loss -User Revenue - 19002 (years) Net Impact $ 5,45! 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT 910 i PROJECT NAME: 10" FORCE MAIN DAVIS BLVD. - PUMP STATION NO. 11 TO f SANTA BARBARA BLVD. f. .. DESCRIPTION: 2,400 L.F. OF FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (k) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: ?, DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: •y • FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) "+ Pre- ;" Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-W Forecast 1989-90 Budget Year 090-91 " 5 U§1-92 58 58 1992-93i ) 1993-94i ► , i ,, j l uture Wtal # 5 58 , , _ : 63 38P:YMPACT"ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL �t ., ` LIFE OF Tii-A Year of Impact 91/92 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 1.68 per L.F. - t Number of Units 2400 { Gross Cost_. $ 4035 Lesi User Revenue - 4035 Net Impact $ t�4,;BOCK 039Pa o, 546 20 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT 1 911 PROJECT NAME: DAVIS BLVD. PUMP STATION NO. 11 DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES M (Planning District Nam .1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement:, DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER size of This Project-., FINANCIAL SU?XARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Yeaf Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-89 Forecast 1989-90: Budget Year 1990-911� 13 J991-92; j 129 rl29 i992-93! Future 129 142 J Total 13 IMIMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS rijif. Yeakof Impact 91/92 Cost per Unit $ 7721 Number, of Units 1 Gross -'.Cost $ 7721 Less -Uset'Revenue 7721 Net Impact 100K 036 547 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT # 912 PROJECT NAME: 10" FORCE MAIN, DAVIS BLVD. PUMP STATION NO. 14 TO PUMP STATION NO. 11 DESCRIPTION: 7800 L.P. OF 10" FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY D IVI SION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: 11111 FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-89- Forecast 1989-90 4ear Budget W90-91 17 17 1991-92 189 189 1992-93; i993-941 17 189 -206 IMPACT OX'FdTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL Y-: LIFE 'OF., First Year of Impact 91/92 -:FACILITY Cost per Unit 1.68 per L.F. Number of units $ 3116 20 Less User*Revenue - 3116 (years) -INet.Impact $ K 36ph,-E 58 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT # 913 PROJECT NAME: DAVID BLVD. PUMP STATION NO. 14 DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (i) (Planning District NEW) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior.- - i988-89; Forecast 1989-90; Budget Year i§90-91' 9 9 1991-92: 96 i 96 1992-93; .1993-94i Future Total-- 9 96 --IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE., bF FirstYearof Impact 91/92 FACILITY Cost.'pA-r Unit $ 7721 Number of Units I Gross Cost $ 7721 20 Less -User Revenue - 7721 years Net Impact $ '50000Urz-6. 9. WA:-z-4 Ale—, ' ' r - - ` - ' ' - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT # 914 PROJECT NAME: 2011 FORCE MAIN, CR 951JUS 41 PUMP STATION No. 18 TO PUMP STATION NO. 1 DESCRIPTION: 11,400 L.F. OF FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:' ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER size of This' Pr'o"j'ect FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other Total Prior 1988-89, Forecast 1989-901 Budget Year U96-91; 46 V� k6 '19*il-92, q. 502 1992-93 1993 941 Future orb 1 46 502 481 iMPACT*ON-FuTuRE OPERATING BUDGETS listIMA TiSEFut First'Year-of Impact 91/92 -LIFE-OF. FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 1.68 per L.F. Number,of Units 11400 (hoax -Cost $ 19168 20 Less'User'Revenue - 19168 (years) Net_Impact Im act $ -t� 4'A 500K 036 1.4 rAlt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update Ispring 1989) PV PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ! TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION f' PROJECT NAME: DAVIS BLVD. PUMP STATION NO. 18 PROJECT 1 915 { DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES M (Planning District Name) :. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY �^ DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94, Total..Deficiency:..,+�, ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY.($ IN TSOUSANDS). I Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior r 1988-89 Forecast 1989-90 j Budget Year .. ' v,' 1'1 90-91 E 36 1991-92 1992-93i I 1993-94' Future woUr 36 -'IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS *so First -Year :of Impact 91/92 Cost -per Unit $ 7721 Number of Units 1 Gross Cost S 7721 Less User Revenue - 7721 Net Impact $ lam 03 k - ,j t 394 S4�i4 axuiuY 394 . _ i — -- r430, ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE -Or ,. FACILITY, years] CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM Les 660K 036 ko.t 552'�' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE.Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT 0 917 PROJECT NAME:, NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION (2 MGD) DESCRIPTION: DESIGN SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION (COSTS FROM 201 FACILITIES PLAN) 'PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (j) (Planning District Na RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement:,._. MOD DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 1.3 ORGANIZATION:. WASTEWATER Size of This -Project;t-7--.--2.Q- FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year, Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-891 Forecast 1989-90� Budget Year 237 �991-92 2607 c 1260 1992-93, 1993-94i Future Tstal 237 2607 j,2844 tri -IJMPidf ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL First Year of Impact 93/94 -per LIFE OF FACILITY Cost Unit $ Number of Units: Gross Cost $ 11025 10 Less7User Revenue - 11025 (years), Net impact $ 1009, .55 �• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update(Sp r ng 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION LINE PROJECT # 918 C PROJECT NAME: 20" FORCE MAIN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD - CR 951 TO POLLY AVENUE DESCRIPTION: 11,400 L.F. OF 20" FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (N) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: i� DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: .k I G ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of Year Prior 1988-89=: Forecasi ra + 1 ;rA 1989-901 Fdget Year 90-91� 1991-921 1992-93, 1993-941 Future.l FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction I Land Construction I Other 46 Total 146 lh-*UIMPACT'ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First. Year of Impact 92/93 ' Cost per Unit $ 1.68 per L.F. Number of Units 11400 Gross Cost $ 9168 Less User Revenue _ 9168 Net Impact $ tV" 03fip�G'*554x 502 502 Total 3 1 rr' .502i 1. 4� ESTIMATED'JSEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 1 20 (years) . � I yy] 4 r� 11 �APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM I TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT # 919 PROJECT NAME: RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD PUMP STATION NO. 20 DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION- 5 SOUTH NAPLES (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:, ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of -This Projectr_-i.:f' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-W Forecast I 1989-90i Budget Year • 1990-91i 16 1921-92i 180 i :180 1992- 931 1993-94' Future Total 16 7- 180 yr1961 .;-j-:-.IMPACT t ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS -t ZSTIMATED 'USEFU , LIFE OF First -Year of impact 92/93 FACILITY.1 Cost per Unit $ 7721 Number of Units 1 Gross Cost $ 7721 A 20 rAss(User-Revenue - 7721 (years)_ A! Net Impact $ A- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT # 920 PROJECT NAME: PUMP STATION NO. 16 - CR 951 DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements' DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Projects' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - .Year.... Construction Land.. Construction Other ..Total Prior 1988-89 Forecast 1989-901 Budget Year 1996-911 14 14. Ml-921 154 1541 19i2-93 1993-94 *=64 14 154 _7T __l 6 i 1i IMPAMON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL First �Year '�of Impact 92/93 LIFE . OF - FACILITY, Cost per unit $ 7721 Number of Units I Gross. -Cost, '$ 7721 .20 Less tys'er-Revenue - 7721 (years) Net -.Impact.-. , $ V - so#,.V36t*Z56,-! . I f I 4�f CAr.L.Lt%1j IMPROVEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION LINE PROJECT # 921 PROJECT NAME: 12" FORCE MAIN CR 951 - PUMP STATION NO. 16 To PUMP STATION NO. 18 DESCRIPTION: 10,800 L.F. OF 1211 FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (4) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements_. DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:, ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: FINANCIAL,,SUMMARY,($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior - i988-89; I. Forecast 1989-90 Y, X Budget ear 1990-91 41. 29 i 29 1991-92 j 321 re 1321 1992-93 19 3- 994 e -cc Future To 29 321 3501 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS 'bp 'LIFE First -Year of Impact 92/93 FACILITY Cost-perrUnit $ 1.68 per L.F. Number of Units 10800 Gross Cost $ 18159 20 .,Less -User Revenue - 18159 years) Net Impact' $ M1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT # 922 PROJECT NAME: NORTH COUNTY PUMP STATION TELEMETRY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: RADIO TELEMETRY SYSTEM PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES —A M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: 1988-94 Total D fic ncy DEPARTMENT.; ADMINISTRATION e Ae ORGANIZATION:"' WASTEWATER Size of Thi9 Pro e FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-894 rorecas f09-90 Lar 5 50 o Budget 1990-91 1991-921 i992-931 1 9 93-94 Future 1 V Ual 5 50 T"Ailm"69'FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS 12sirilki6 SE FiAiVYi0if':of Impact 89/90 Cost per Unit $ 1500 - Number of Units o I Gross. -Cost- $ 1500 0 Les3tUser,.'Revenue - 1500 (years) Net Impact $ 4f BOOK Q36 PA,-658 M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM n TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: OPERATIONS BUILDING PROJECT # 923, PROJECT NAME: NORTH COUNTY WWTP - OPERATIONS BUILDING DESCRIPTION: OFFICE AND LABORATORY FOR THE FACILITY PERSONNEL PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (j) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurements—,i DEPARTMENT:.ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency:;TM -; 1 ORGANIZATION:. WASTEWATER Size of This Projects,+� r FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) Pre- I j Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior .,� • . ; 1988-89 j Q8.3Ht Forecast' aa:).) I r 1989-90 250 40 pe-L29Q Budget ear ss.• ' f�,,;;; 1990-91 i tp_rJe�t 1991-92 se-aeet 993-94 Future { I � 9'1Uyv'3 TCt=a 250 40 tc.299 i ]1CT..ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS - ESTZMa►TM.1VSEFUt 'af LIFE' OF + First:,Year Impact 89/90 :; FACILITY: I ; f Cost'per Unit $ i Number of Units Gross Cost $ 41052 Less1-User Revenue - • 41052 (years)�:;;.,•r • Net Zflipact $ , nox G3*6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT # 924 PROJECT NAME: NORTH COUNTY MASTER PUMP STATION NO. 1.10 DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (i) (Planning District e) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT CH DEFICIENCY .DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: �DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-89 Forecaxt'' 589-90. 98 392 490 Budget Year 1990-91'' i991_92 1992-93 1993-94". r ui&e �4 Total 98 392 490 n7, IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USETUL, LIFE Or First Year of Impact 89/90 FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 7721 Number of Units 1 Groan Cost $ 7721 20 Less User Revenue - 7721 (yearn) Net Impact $ 08k600K 560 RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY axe $all UiTt LVIM 9 SEITICI STANtm 1.1*. TMfCWTIA too TEARS LINEI au cvA*I1Y nMA 108 put in CAP6:111 m CAPA CITY ACITY vpm wm jt CNPXITT K%K I I rm 0-2 CAP!, 11, Rioultif CAPACITY PUME1 IIEFICIM" CHI At KfDKLV vo tm YEAR Klixili AVG. AV41LAKE 1.204 RE2111mv IN Cip 2XI TIM LM It." is p-H IWO 242,022 2s7..51 612,140 1.9 WIt 1"162 1.044,1" 271,714 1,13i'm 1,=,IU 9,312."l V4,661 1.7 ff-" I —I'm I,IOi,1i1 211,714 2114.3" 1.234,542 7,s13.2$1 Lc 9"1 1 r-4 I.sr.,osl 104.5" 2T7,397 1.1t2'21s 2,us,441 i 12,213,06 113111 2.4,2,713 211,307 311,443 I'm.903 10,942,11f 112-13 III"$ I'lujil 31i'm :24,441 1,4",334 1,"6,124 0.1 13-14 Z"sn 1.12mo; :24.419 =ju, -4.961j0- W" 2110" 1.4",3/4 337.111 32,139 1",443 4 0.1 I"i MINI 1,161,41: 32.439 jujo U3,234 1XII.- -A:;i 1" 4 3441161 311'300 62,rs 3"'60 1. Ii.m.1m 1. WXI 401,734 1:41,2431 14,141'sul 1. :43702 421,9" 11,161,2431 U.961,4511 0. FMATIM milmill CAPICITY 20 TIM CAPACITY Firm/ "LWJ CI-NIH CAPA:ITT RiguILD CAPACITY ?LAND WIVE= I COST H TIRE MIDII C-19TU AV%ILAr.E 1.2n rL;UIKI 11 CIP 2" YEFA Las usenn MU= to Gf'-Cbr 'Ituf" Ir.2" I.Ni.764 2111714 211,501 Is nu ram tul,414) ",I" i7,n1 I"I'm Ilms AF .11 win 41114 11,131,nn If.th Ic Ytm Tom 16,111,671 , JIDA im t In u-111 -'Intl 20 'I odul:j BOOK 036p�g!!4 WC uij t' ` • ` =r :RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94'.DEPICIEHCY IS-IK-n W.11 1AITt �r Im N It141ct slawn 1.11111111WIT1 1t1 ttltl 11 All 41011 1:111 c roroLAna ro!11 At1a W-El 1M tmQ km I" It1tt1 IWt11f ww 1 III:k C11•111t tic lilt 1lOatril A EI on hum0IfICImn tali 11 S na n111011 Ayt, talk &WJkL1 WAtIAP.t 111111113 !0 CIO Ill-ttcRl tun rn,N1 1 -- l7-n 154u1 nA477e MI M-5 / �' p n liAll2 :131ti7 34.I :20.1 m.S :00 ��•,.. lc.s IIn,14s «A 515.1 313.4 li3 3 S,Ili,11t t tYti fi« ::10*41 :AA 570.2 :w.3 144.1 LII7./M .'�Jf"' I1-42 t1tt11 ::2117i 71.0 543.4 :2.4 lest I,In,ttl i2•13 NMI 241W1I n.1 sts.s :31.6 1A7.1 3,1J7sil 1344 2M12 :AI340 U.: 416.1 3A4.1 173.3 3,11/,7l1 ISf•]➢5 _ 14-IS :114q/ ^J'13aN ;..1 43s./ 171.1 77.4 1,541,/M 727172 U1111M 33.1 423.1 :11.7 n 1,. • 111,117 11-" 2MI11 777t111 34.3 310.7 WA t1677'' '� 1114,At51 " 17-11 245:3 :17,44 r;.1 35A.2 411.3 It3.i1'•;'''II,lIt.2I71 111-11 :34471 21712" :7.1 1111.11 -- 0.2.7.7111 1311.20 0 20702 3446721 11.5 213.3 447.5 110.13 0.214,13:1 /1 /1•= 111r3A 11-12.; y 212312 f r ISM :01451 oil" 33134 N 0134101 t y` ot-":, Mir" Iarp[1ta npmAtla 0C1n U0t111 AActm AM$ WWI 1111RJ � ' CHIN TC1 na UNIM1 I= =1 n.A11Q1 1n71VIXTt cm At }r`` Im MIR 1£1ma :It. 10Tk rlaktT t1AtlA1Lt. 1n1a1tI1 11 C17 I11 ttlrlt VIM rn,11/1K1L . /�'' 1" mtut 1/31lM 1732" 114=0 :S.A sr 1 :12.4 313.3 :' 1,111,71t y 1 IiAt Rom t;701 ISOfi. I.i 114C.:1 I5.1 110s.?I 14,111,1731 1•IE111111t1tk 7t1001 3311/A1 :Lt 61.1 371.! 11,1 141411/M :c 5.11 Pam 43N4 4R4:2 L7 fii..31 At.l IlIl.11 t1,131,711� ' 4'? !1 VIAL talk . 4` it11F-170t 2ti70i 341770 :1.5 .2C.3 417.5 Itlt.l! 0.214.1331 Jtrot 4 ' n �1 *' 600K Pu1 .RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1988-94 DEFICIENCY h i wx SOLID BASTE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1.55 TONSICAPIIA li s �� J�IIlAT1DN IE11NN1M6 CAPACITY CAPACITY 1(N1PLlli/ VALUE/ +MKITTi ACTYIIL a fISCAt -:., CO-1tDE CAPACITY REWIRED KAXIED (DEFICIENCY) COST Al �' J"VKLV Vo U$ 4. nAR VEIM(TED AVG. AVAILABLE 1.5500 IN CIP fb.00 PROV10® 156143 3,400,917 I42,022 � 3,158,935 18,153,732 137,333 1.1 - 11-I1 16bt62 3,263,644 257,551 3,006,013 18,036,531 274,667 1.1 175291 2,999,977 271,714 2,717,264 16,303,381 •' 1./ 113534 2,717,264 284,509 2,432,755 14,398,329 1.0 • 11-92 111111 2,43I,153 297,307 2,135,441 12,112,681 1.0 ` 12-95 201011 2,135,448 311,645 1,123,103 10,942,111, 1.0 13-11 209311 1,123,103 324,449 1,491,354 1,914,124 e: lVI-1i - 211001 1,411,354 337,112 1,161,442 A,lN,rtS01t LC rA1 227122 1,161,442 332,031 801,403 4,156,415,° 1.! 236731 609,403 366,169 443,234 2,6S1,402 , LC 245353 11.11.ww,.;;t 443,234 17,933 380,300 374,438 62,933 1331,504) 377,601 I1,iB9,027) 1.f ;254416 . , 1.( 243702. 1331,504) 408,731 (740,2431 14,44114UI I,l POPULATION 1EBINNING CAPACITY CAPACITY SURPLUS/ VALUE/ CO -VIDE CAPACITY REDUIRED PLANNED (DEFICIENCY) COST AT HE MI01 VEIGNTED AVG. AVAILABLE 1.5500 IN CIP 2N0 YEAR LOSS 16.00/TIN KSM TI, 130/11:'.; 1732" 2,188,177 271,714 2,717,264 16,303,58I 0190-l/1S 42701 11,499,623) 66,199 (1,355,822) 11,334,931) r f011DiAt,, , 211001 1,491,354 337,112 1,181,442 6,161,630 , 111 mom{5611 11,130,1541 70,821 11,101,114) 1II,411,1031 '+ 89403 (331,504) 400,738 (740,243) 14,441,4U) - DODK Q36 pia 563 }` CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 4, First CIE Update (Spring 1989) f- PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL FACILITY PROJECT 1000 i PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL LAND ACQUISITION DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE LAND ADJACENT TO NAPLES LANDFILL { PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK (I) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement:'ACRES', DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1988-94 Total Deficiency:'178.1 { ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Projectr`�"' 0y1 t tt FINANCIAL SUMMARY (s IN THOUSANDS) Pre - tear Construction Land Prior 1988-89, 446 Forecast 1989-90 ; 446 r' Budget Year �0-91i 446 i991-92� 446 1992-93; 446 1993-94` 446 Future 1784 fal 4460 V IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact h"-- A. Cost per Unit $ Number, of Units. ,'• GrossCost$ Loss User Revenue - " Net Impact $ Construction I Other Total' 446 i"446 ;4 4, 17 i j j"�1�•d ESTIMATBD`USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY - .r yearss ) ` soon636 PvE 564 I t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT F rst CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL PROJECT # 1001 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL LEACHATE TREATMENT DESCRIPTION: TREATMENT FACILITY INCLUDING PLANT AND RETENTION POND PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK (T) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSAND$) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Fri -or is-ag 9, 11 "i orecas I ; 989-90 50 5d tidget Year 1990-91 1000 425 1425 �991-921 2-93 + f Eg-�.@Rt 4.9,9 3 - 9 4 50 1000 425 1 r,W JMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL _d? LIFE rirxtrYea:i-,of Impact F�LPXLIT4r: cost per Uriit Number of Units Gross Cost $ 10- Less,jUser-Revenue (years);,,. Net Impact $ BOOK, 036 PAGE565, k� a, r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL PROJECT # 1002 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELL SIX, PHASE II DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTED LINED CELL AREA PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK (N) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: TONS DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1988-94 Total Deficiency: 1:057,322 I ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project:' '1:036551; FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-W 2153 .' 215� Forecast 24 1989-901 750"`'7S� Budget Year nvi;�:• 1q-0QQ1 1991-92j 1992-93; 1993-94 1 iKiture '1'$tal i71- 2903 ZMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATEVTS :T .. 'of ,LIFE OF FirI Year.,.. Impact FACitITY'`. Cost per Unit S Number, of Unity 1 Gross Cost. - $ Less'User Revenue - (years) ;,� / 1 100K 036 PA,,! 566 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update,(Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL PROJECT 11003 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELL 6, PHASE III DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT LINED CELL AREA PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measuremen.t:.TONS.. DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficiency:.1.057.,J22 6iWANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of 'This Project:,,,.-. 1.1.8213 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total 1988-8911 r6tecast 1?89-90i. Budget Year 9 0 911 so 2600 19,9,i-921 i992-93! 1993-941 ruture 3 u;j I I!, I Total._...._..- 50 2600 FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUT. .ZIMPACT-ON LIFE' Or First Year. .Yea r of Impact FACILITY Cost -per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 2.5 Lesx-Xsek Revenue (years) Net Impact $ 500K 567 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT , pr First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL PROJECT # 1004 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELL 3&4 CLOSURE I DESCRIPTION: CLOSE FILLED CELL PER FDER PERMIT PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK _ (!) (Planning District Name) i RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficiency: ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) . Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total i Prior { 1988-89 r Forecast _ 1999-90 25 1410 365.,:_ ;7 Budget Year ` ar:> 1990-91: 1991-92 1 :Y 1992-93: ! _ 1993-94; %6_1 o_ 25 1410 i'"IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE • -OF First'Year of Impact FACILITY Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 20 Less User Revenue — years Net Impact $ y syg CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT First CIE Update (Spring 1989) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL PROJECT # 1005 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELL 6; PHASE 1, FIRST LIFT 8.26 ACRES DESCRIPTION: PHASED IN CLOSURE PER FDER PERMIT PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1988-94 Total Deficiency:.. ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) " Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1988-89i .: <` ` Forecast i 1989-901 1280 i _1280 i $fidget Year > 1991-92! 1992-93� 1993-94' ; ��-E Future tL; :! 1280 ,; i280 ;MPACT;ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED•USEFUL LIFE OF ' Firs'.,'Yea-i of Impact FACILITY ! Cost` per Unit $ Number of Units, Gross Cost $ 20 .'...... Less --User, Revenue - (years), Net impact ; 6011�+ �i1�'• rile.°' ljTxf�' 1 i APPENDIX C COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCING CAPACITY FIRST CIE UPDATE (Spring, 1989) FY 90-94 Prepared by office of Growth Management Y~A f ,a 41 is 5 1 x:. Doc. Refs APP-C.CIB w e , r List of Tables ` Table # Title Pa a 1 General Governmental Revenues by Source General Governmental Expenditures by Function F 3 Bond Issuance, Debt Service i Direct 11 Capital outlay Capacity { A. 4 Ratio of General Bonded Debt to Assessed 12 Values and General Bonded Debt Per Capita $ 5 Schedule of Water Sewer Funds Revenue 13 :. Bond Coverage I'• 4 f" 6 Forecast Models Statistical Measures 14 y �4 � �,• ,rya. r - - 2Oki Fi v: ?«=' Doc.Refs APP-C.CIE ' COLLIER COUNTY Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Y FY 90-94 Introduction This forecast of Collier County's capacity to finance growth related capital improvement through 1994 has been prepared as a ' component of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Collier " County Growth Management Plan in compliance with Rule 9J-5 of the } Florida Administrative Code. -The forecasts, projections and estimates presented in this section have been prepared as tools to aid County officials and staff in planning for the period 1990-1994. None of the figures appearing in this report are to be construed as absolute in terms of reliability or as reflecting the intent of Collier County elected or appointed officials. These projections present some possible alternatives given a set of assumptions and variables. The .;v variables are subject to change by action of the Board of County ., i�Commissioners or their appointed County Manager or in some cases maybe affected by changes in the level of economic activity. The forecasts and analyses presented in this section are based on established and tested statistical methods which predict future trends based on past economic and demographic records. Significant changes in these trends, i.e., the economic climate, the propensity of people to migrate to Collier County, and the willingness of the electorate to finance government initiatives would impact the viability of the forecasts presented in this section. Summary of Findings n- {`: The narrative, analysis and tables in this report establish that " Collier County should have the financial capacity during the period 1990-1994 to provide the infrastructure and capital improvements needed by its citizens. Applying a set of conservative assumptions and variables, the County through prudent management of its resources could comfortably assume additional general obligation debt and "pay as you go" capital improvements. The goals and levels of service standards in the Capital Improve- ment Element of the Growth Management Plan appear to be attainable within the financing capacity of Collier County through 1994. ing, 1989 - 3 600K 72 y.. W 00 Doc Ref t APP-C.CIZ $85,000,000 in additional general obligation debt capacity Capital Revenue millage levy at a stable 1.0 mill through 1994 will generate $68,046,000 An!additional $67,000,000 available for "pay as,you,go" capital projects from undedicated revenues Maintenance of a maximum bonded debt to taxable value ratio of less than 0.56% $127,000,000 in additional utility revenue bonding capacity with no significant rate increase after 1989td - >D to T, Id4r,l L�,-` Spring, 1989 - 4 - 5dT I Doc.Refs APP-C.CIB: ~- h COLLIER COUNTY Capital Improvement Financing Capacity a jr, Demographic L Fiscal Forecasts ?' r FY 90-94 I. Population and Taxable Property Base Collier County population grew at an exponential rate during the period 1976-89 for a total increase of 128%. This pattern of rapid growth is forecast to continue at the same or a slightly higher periodic rate to 186,300 in 1994, an increase of 26% over 1989 (Table 4, Column 2). �•, As population has grown, so has the taxable property base. , This .is due to the combined impact of a rapid increase in the County real property inventory due to new construction and the appreciat- ion of existing real property which is a reflection of demand for housing by the influx of new residents. #> Since the 1981 revaluation, taxable property values have increased by 178%. Taxable property values are forecast to increase to $16,703,000,000 by 1994 (Table 4, Column 3). This will provide an ,ample ad valorem tax base to fund both "pay as you go" and bond financing of infrastructure expansion and capital improvements in the CIE to meet the needs of the rapidly growing population in Collier County. II. General Governmental Revenues jE,'Tax collections and intergovernmental transfers, consisting - predominantly of ad valorem, sales and gas taxes, are the primary �. source of revenue for government operations. These revenues are also the most bondable revenues available to the County, resulting in favorable terms and interest rates from lenders. These revenues will continue to grow from 83% of total revenues in 1989 to 85% in 1994 (Table 1, Columns 2 and 4). Due to the constitutional prohibition against a state income tax and the improbability of a change in the political climate • opposing this revenue source for the forecast period, 1990-1994, the major portion of the burden for infrastructure and capital improvements will fall on the property owner. Rapidly growing revenues from gas and sales taxes will help to mitigate the reliance on the ad valorem tax as long as the County economy ,continues to expand rapidly. C Other potential sources of revenue are available to the County during the forecast period 1990-1994. Most notable of these would be the local option one cent sales tax which would raise in excess of $100,000,000 during the period 1990-1994. This revenue has not been factored into this analysis since it must be approved by the voters at a special election before it can be levied. Spring, 1989 ` , 4 - 5 - 100K UJI)`PAEJ`fL",, .41" .x Doc.Ref i APP C.CIB� 9'w Collier County has more latitude to'levy additional ad valorem taxes to finance CIE infrastructure capital projects than numerous Florida counties which are currently at or approaching the 10 mill cap. The Collier county -wide millage for FY 88/89 is 4.6157 which -" includes a newly instituted 1.0 mill levy for a Capital Revenue Fund for both CIE and non -CIE capital projects. The projections in this report are based on the conservative assumption that the Capital Revenue Fund millage levy will remain constant at 1.0 mill for the forecast period 1990-1994. 'III. General Governmental Expenses As revenues are forecast to grow at exponential rates through 1994, expenses of daily governmental operations will grow at a `slightly slower rate. of particular note and importance will be a significant increases in General Government, Public Safety, Human "-Services, and Culture and Recreation costs (Table 2, Columns 2, 3, 7 and 8). This positive gap between revenues and expenses, augmented by the Capital Revenue Fund, will provide capacity to f" finance -the infrastructure and facilities capital improvements necessary to provide environmental quality of life for Collier County residents during this period of exponential population Jo' growth. With a prudent balancing of bond issues and "pay as you go" capital improvement projects, the County should have the financial ability to meet the demands of its citizens in the 1950's. IV. General Bonded Debt Capacity ; The ability to finance additional bond issues will be of critical ' ''importance if Collier County is to adequately meet the needs of } its citizens in the 1990's. Table 3 presents an estimate of maximum additional general obligation bond issues and "pay as you ,.•go" capital improvement funds available to the County based on forecast revenues and expenses for general governmental operations. Maximum comfortable debt service as a percentage of bondable revenues is assumed to be 13%. This is in keeping with recent decisions by the electorate and the Board of County Commissioners. For example, Debt Service Expenses in 1986 were ?_ 13.2% of bondable revenues. Under this assumption, the County could incrementally assume an additional $85,000,000 in general obligation bonds through 1994 (Table 3, Column 7). An additional $123,000,000 would be available from undedicated net revenues and the Capital Revenue Fund for "pay as you go" capital improvements, 'T- contingencies, and as a buffer against forecast variances (Table 3, _ Columns 8 and 9). la a: Spring, 1999 -:,•, 6 i. C, t�. Doc.Ref2 APP-C.CIE :. 1' The projections on additional debt 'capacity are carried forward and added to existing general bonded debt to produce the forecasts on table 4, Columns 4-6 for 1990-1994. Under the previously w described assumption of a 13% comfort zone, Table 4, Column 4, shows the resulting total general bonded debt if all additional capacity were used for general obligation bonds. The maximum ratio of general bonded debt to taxable value would still be less than 0.56% in 1994. V. Water i Sewer Funds Bonded Debt Cavacity Net revenue available to fund new bond issues in the utility funds and to maintain the required 1.0 coverage ratio will allow the issuance of an additional $127,000,000 in utility bonds through 1994. Gross revenue (Table 5, Column 2) is projected to grow at an annual rate of 8% based on demand. �Y a r• + �.. _ i... 3I f spring, 1989 7 - ' 606r 036 P1►476 .IN.? Doc.Ref: APP-C.CIE f Forecasting Methodology The projections and estimates appearing in Tables 1-5.for`thi'` forecast fiscal years 1990-1994 were prepared using standairdiied time series forecasting and analysis techniques. Historical financial data for the thirteen year period 1976-1988 (1981-1989 for Taxable Value) appearing in "Collier County, Florida p Comprehensive Annual Financial Report," for the year ended September 30, 1988 were used to prepare estimates for the fiscal years 1990-1994. r Statistical measurement models of various types were tested for a`'all:time series on Tables 1-5 and various other relevant -series not appearing in the final report. A five step process was y applied to each series to select the model and resulting forecast `which produced the most realistic estimates as follows: Analvtical Steps 1. Basic statistical tests of all time series data for random- ness and autocorrelation to determine the most suitable analytical model. 2. Prepare regression trend models and forecasts types: linear trend, exponential trend, and polynomial trend for all time ►'z "' series. ram; rrr3. Compare statistical measures generated for each model and 1►-'; resulting forecast to select the model which best fits each time series. 4. Prepare Box -Jenkins models for historical series that did not r fit well into regression trend analysis. see note below. 5. Consolidate historical time series models and forecasts into projections of Collier County financial strength through 1994. h Note: Box-Jenkins Modellin '�. Ca culat on Method - Logged Models Automatic Identification Marquard non -linear least squares with background stepwise elimination of non- significant coefficients. Automatically selected for time series when appropriate. Differencing, autoregressive and moving average conversions applied via auto - correlation function when appropriate. - 8 60'41 036 & 577,,E kh ^: r. r-4 g fl. co at Qt r4 ri Nr'O'M.-1N000OO aN o00000000 00 ri Mt0 M r tD N riN O N 0000 00 00 0 10NN►TV'aT.-IWOOaTr1000000000 Oo-4NVoinmNor 'v4ONmwtn w in �irNwMOt000rlr4v.gOt0r'0'wMv c-4wrA w " w A w w w wr- ovr-iwoLnm . . . . • . • . . • • . ► . . • . . 1ArNfAviAOtw.rotnr-4tDo.4acno" n r1 r 4 N ri N N N M wT d' to to r O mmr4NM r4 ri ri N N NOttAr-4rOOwltAtOM000000000 f` 701NONwTNOt4TrM000OOOOOO L Oriwi'r-INNOtr-Iri010000000000 m �Owr tD tDMMOMoo V'fOMtnONtn OtMtD it AtOMeANNtDrtAMP`wr r1 ri 01 Mt0 OtM t0 m.iwrritnNOtc-1MOwlMtn%D0%01.-1NMtn%D ♦J rl • ♦ . • • w • • ♦ • • • • ♦ w R Qlririri.-i.-INNNNNNNNNr'1MMe'1r1 H NM w NritOrra=otAwrrwr000000000 ' tD aIOODtD4700r�t70N000D000000000 � �tAODr-IOttAtntDOtON000000000 " G M Ot r r tO tO M O rh to N O a r4 to N M co en .. .r4 -r4 N Ln 1D 1A N M tD r 01 M m to ri to v O m 4 %D %t mMMtnr%0rc0rfbrMco-w-wcomco-w 4 W • ♦ . . . . . . . . O1NN Nenm -qLn WN N .d li NOtOr-4NrMNr00M000000000 4A 0 mMwrno,rooao.-Irn000000000 � ' 41i Uv110NN.-IM01Mt00000000000 N?V1tOtOt!'1tDNm r- 14 C,.ANt00-W 0r4tn U m iltnortn�OrnMNtnvtnraoNr.-+tnowr ..4 dr'�7'NOO.^�rriNtAe"1s1'CONtA0�Nt00t � 14 r4140-1 N N N Maw a} to to to t0 t0 t0 1 N N - r101NNMONa0r1.°iN000000000 � � 1 � 1a IOCOtOfTOrNOOri(9tTO00000Q00 _• AJ C.-Iwr01w/'O�1't/fOM0000000000 :.?COMw?OtaOr'at0001UfOtflOU10.-1r td H �tTGOCOtOMeI'f+f0lriwi'rriOtOrtOrirN O10rar4r-Vf, 4Nr-W 4mmm-TM01 m mMwrtDMlOtDtoOr•ir-1.-iNtnrQtNwOwr (,. r1 ri ri ri ri e-1 r1 r•i N N M en tl1 � N a N Nt'tOotDOOt.-Ir4AMw7'000000000 b M di1O-4 M 0 VLMN'-4M0000000000 rl w.04m 1Nvm0'Pr1AN0000a00a0 U C.J NritAOIrNM(41l1m f"'triODtDMr4 U Q1rOrcor-,wrNN-'.-4coc4 itA00Nto0 V) aLL M to Ot M 0 01 M to O A N co N wT to co c 4 M t0 f.i ri ri ri ri r•4 N N N N s/ M M f'=1 'tf' wr v N � � i N NtAtDNNNt7DOttp000000 000 41�,1 a N NI.-r IOfT.NN iC4co-W-400ao00000 C7 k1tnrtn.-4rga%cotArvaQoaoao00 ra . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . ♦ . E-4 cn-4Nri-W01-0intoOMO%or•4N0%ri N m tOrlrr Oic- IVtowC4mP.cotA%Or110.i.T A r4 co 0\ M sl v M to O M In v v O O N Ln N to . . . . . • . . • . ♦ . . . . . . . . ri .d Ot Ot O r-4 N M r r N to O N to O to o tO M 0 U R .-4 r4 rl Hrlr-4 N NM M wr N to t0 tD r410 C. O N H Qi ri HtOrco0t0riNMw}tnt0re7001OriNMwo� r-4 A ttlrrrroo4Amf0Oc0Oa0Of70OtOtQ7/TOt N %4 ri r-1 r 1 ri r 4 N r-1 ri ri ri e-1 r 4 ri ri r-/ ri ri r♦ r-i r-/ 4t 4 O x ;, SOOK ' 036 -,,!' 18 . c ,t L Y. I IJ rrvrl Vr.'W •r Wr•I Vr V r✓ V V V•✓V tJ t.J hoNovEnmmMnoaoo000O0 N N M w r7 N w W m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O rowr^tCr• va 4NVMhwriN0w01- "r0 ri ym0Mhn wa 09-4m mH Ori w In OMW �nnMOl'i-10 -, 1-1N10t0Nv 00M W ww N-wwmm LnOv r-NOOhw wNh.iwri ri-1 rAri NN M M M'4 v N w w h n W 0m N C7n.-INO V'O W C1.-IOOOOOOOaOO UwtON W W OlnwNnOOOOOOOOO O M mN O OO O 0 0 0 O O C1 NIH>PC�Oir,ilrir� kco co OMmcoon.rmMmmw0MNN m'YNhri W OhMmMOm0N�rww WmHmMNntominvr-o-Irihmm r-i ri N MIn In V1: 10 nhhw 101; C N ti 0 •r4nr4ClMMN0V0%00000000000 0 4Jm%otn000wvlvnwooa000000 co -W0N%0.4VOOOOOOOOOO O � �vn + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 kt0rihcAhn0mmcotnerDomW e'oNm r•i U r-1 r h'C'.i h n w O Ln W N to n O to n lnM v In l0 h m ri N LnLn h co N W&n r-i mnnmM a ........... .-i H .-i ri r-1 r•C N t`I M y •r 1C1 w n m .. N y r+ �•�' •Tnn.-inlov0000000ao UO 'Wrn OInwMOOaaOOOOa +4.4r,'T1.1wmNMrimN0O00O0O00 �O410tOr4wrmmr-!'1nNOnIC1N0hln f•1 6Ui i". W co MM1001MLnOr-IOOam%0O-WCIO .gLO (� Q101N W OMCOOON1nNCAOMtnnON r-1 r-I r-i ri N N N N M M •Q' er V' 'P U7 lf1 N V � �+ t0M0U-1MNr.NhM0000000O0 von.-�NloolnNr�00000OOOO ICE) Ti O OCornulvu9C`•.-i01Mn000000000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • krihln0r-IlnwNwO/MLnr-InWNCOCTM ri14r-Vr4q'mN00%Mr4mn.in-W0r- Ln > wcio -IOnnnoMn'71000r4c4m t vLn RQ71 W N N ri r-1 N r-1 ri ri r-1 ri ri rl �40J j +�i�1 W WW F3( iJ) hWnr-It0C0M1'�tP10OOOOOOOOO � k r-IV'nOn�l'10r101OOOOOOOOOO W 10OMOOOOOOOOO pW9 to� 1�{� tn 0000OVDG1ln 0O1 p N•r1nM0101t0afhOOnMMNl0OMhr-Itn C.VtnWn-,r,4-1wNNhrilnar-1mwmr4co rai i0 y ro An Ntn q V1N nH r-i M whN wmcn r- q V' I �1 . . + • wt- C'r r�N Nr1 `tT4 V tolCl tll lfl In 1D l010nhCO CO 01m �~ r.4M 8 C�.-Ivtn0rnLnC'�1l0art00000a000 H qR@?10Nr4 V1.-IMNLnO%LnOOOOOOOOa nQM 6MOr-IInLn#.oN000aoOOOO • ► . . • . . . . . ► . . . . . . . . V-4 0-wN%0C•0910n0Inr-40MN0 vNu1NM N Pr- a co0tninnhmwm.immhlnMNH �•14tolnrimMMtoWmNNMO@'Inl0noom . . . . . . . . . . . . W Cri ri ri riH ri H N N N riH ri 1-1 riH WN NomriwMmto LnnOoOoOOOoO tneTeren01ncONOlNOOOOOOOOO 0 cohmmninawwhoa000a000-H• A.1 . . r-1 CJmorirr:r.: o r-I1.; vv1nLnLn1. 1; m WLnN.-4MN.r4O00ma'WV*WN%D0 rCO NNO V'NMM4' W Ili rivriIli ri000ri MV'410 h co o o N to co N In h m o N w%0 eir-4ririHC*4NNNmmmfn N i1mN-WLMV.ilnnh0000OOOOaO Ommwwmingi-in.iOOOOOOOoo CI CO CO rimOlnlnNlnOOOOOOOOO k MririMtll'V'mwMtnwtiwaOONMtnh N@ nV'CnMsrr-IhNririerOMCnCOONq�w f~ �MtnO.Tr•imtC1MN1^+iC)NtOwtOnnnn OMMulv�rl�nncacool.irninwn000+ori C� ririririr-1rir1NN N e-1 ro kwnWm OriNMV In w n w m a rl Mqr U ronnhncoWaoo�c000cococ000mmmmm ri N rymmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm �'+ D+ ri ri ri r♦ r+ .♦ H .i ri r4 ri ri r•1 ri ri r•1 ri ri ri W. An, UJti ►As! J79 i,C @ Z r4 1 N O H z Ot:�r•13oo000 0 0 to O • •�1 y H r'f N r O S v' N N iQ 41 i.AJ M Oi qi� . • r • ♦ } ♦ r•1 e4 r-t .q 14 to .r4 s{..41 V N _ � W to '.L 0 .. u' 0 0 d 00000 rH0000o o tor. OOD a G '400 E aJ { to o a r4 p M W a,- v .•a pp W �.v to AJ • r-I 0 pKOOvONr� to oaIS A .'t. W .-1 r-I N N .-I N i J 14 > C3 10 . +1 Ottn N rn to to r4 w . to to $4.-1' 0 gn 41 �y 0 4A N 1� ((J • w �'1 W N e0 u1 �ero0 .. W .•1 �! gab rr to to rN !G u �0000047c,i IA Is U ' ai 0�100000 W 1/ 0 01 J ri a r t Ow 00000 • 1 to rd Q! H 0 3 N p 0 0 ;- c Q ..infir-1r��O�ry ✓ .dy le au _ .Ar"c of 4 N �4 . ri •-, .-I N > 1 %� � i^ � �: •: (� •'y �1J .-I ..j�{ O O O O O j� OOo00 to t� C'. � ♦ A J ISM HpHp o C��am.•'' � � :'� _ tD h N to to ,-, U N w U kt . • 'S• r� _� a r '• J.� N i�HNW OaT 77 � U 0 . go O J 'r N00000 H'VH 0 C .4 vI w sn o 0 0 0 0 . k 0 'i j fa 0 b� N' to Got0 O v +� 0 .N aJ H 6-4 a" iA A N kY!? -. iF'•: to a 0► O N r1 v1 V 47 H . 1 ri e I • +1 41 r'i 4) Q + P P44 all OW U N 1 r, -4 ✓ ,: -�0p00000 O O tD .UJ0.1OOO1Q4 41 i0 IS 8 W H tl•I - •' H�ootvoa%Ln r AA 41 N 0 > �Qr-Wa%0 p JJ D 4 NR0 d01N a .-I H 41 H 4j 0 1 0 ,.. rt� .00atO re. M EIN oA -f( r t.4 M N r ,. • r♦ U M .-4 N M V 41 0 4io010tom v ...� .. .► BOOK 036wr5 J • . f . n { •g 4: LNLnN1,Nr-IM%OMONEOr-IMN7\OC1/r FJt M � 4 -I COh1ANtAhN-ThNNr•IM!'+M\oNO*ID iytL {1 5� 1JNt> w4m' O.-1 a Ci N N r•1 •-i e-1 .-1 tw 0 h h 10 w �n N fV M 4 IA 7,�.•. - V Id IN aOQI � s } o\CO.Otl1MNlo4NOC►4rIhNtO (� w-, If1W m.- 1000000.-1Hrr4l.-Ir+HoM•rvrn%n � �0000000000000C;C 0 a IJ SIAall _ q F Ch nV • • ,. �' �� j'� � 4 It R C�O.1tAMhr-1C1IA1f�"OOOOOOOOO ', 11,; .�:, }w {) Qr••INOrir•IIA�!'I�OOM�A000000000 14 •7 ' u1MLr1tD0 -WC4r- Ia0000000000 a N � '. •• p. nvllo.oOOv.-Io1vNu'fMMoo+•r1oa1 >, - Vr r'4VN0m &n001NLnY 4MM0+ONcnm 1 !:i r T1 a tp 1A M N .-1 O o1 u1 h IA M 01 1D to O W rl o► V' 41 r. t� G] r-1 r 1 .-1 .•1 ri ei CD 0 C 0 00 00 0; P 00 N to r C-1 Pj N M V %0 at (1 - • • 1 400 041 • O 1 Yt.'t 0101 Yd 3 := e! 0 t f_ 001 c, 10 w t• c 0%01 �'•� S. i C -• r � Gin.o�000vt000�a+hre�n�noMMMa•r•► •T1W4 _• . ' +ir- &n mU1NO"V'o-rmMco.4MNh0 T! r�%ohcoImr401•••IIV, coV0-4r--WN010QC1h q1 _ C�">' r�l Y1 •-1 e-1 •i •'/ N M V 1A lf1 10 Ir h 00 01 O N 1.1 V' 10 I 1 `" A .T�"i rl rl rl r'1 rl j •+• Q 9r ;w r4 PPPiii H ;.� a =�'; �000000oo0000o0o000o ' !v0000400000000000000o H a:,-.', aooal�000.•-1.-lo+vo,ol000MaoMooM V'CO4Nt0�0001COt0O01Ot0Mi-1O10 O10 ,•. � OtOh0000C10100•-INMMV�IAt01�1'+CO .N r1 V4 94 H r/ rl rl rl 1-4 r/ V4 9-1 . • O �-• '. a$4%0h000%0•♦NMV'1n%0hOC1O.414MV• U nhhhcoaom000000c00000aoo,a+a1a1a1 0 15'• .� w � o� a a1 a► a1 01 a1010� 01 m o+ o� a+ 010+ a10+ 01 a� t r: w ?I .4 r-1 •4 -0 •4 �4 r 4 .4 .-4 •-1 r/ .4 rl rl .-1 r-1 . / •-1 .4 Z • 1 Art j!.� 581. r Q Ch m 0% Ch rnr a 0 0 Lnr4r4OCh(h $4 .14' 1 , aazzzzzzzzzzz%ncnr�rqmL(n u in 4J 4) u 1; -7 C; 1; 14 1; tq krd V) 14 N C4 rq N W 14 02.. H 41 4) 41 w vi -w o Ln c4 r- 14 V 44 �> u 0 0 w 0 N -Z7,zzzzzzzzzzoococ4rli t-4 lu a fd AAJA to %0 r- 0 �4 to 4IC 1 M -IJ IV 14 -4 t4 a 0 - A. Id of id ol• in r4 -T r4 V4 Ln CO M CT In ch 0 Ch N V N �z A 4 9.4.4 4 4 4,4 4 4 4 4,4 9 -4 0- 4.30 Ln tj fn N 9vat en en m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of JOG 0 M COO C?% M m 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 O 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'd w LM 0 4J .4j i. 04) X V 0 ' LM C44 4 4 r; Lr;,r; u;,,; Ln Ln PA P 44 m NAV 0 fd W 0 V 'n 41 -410 4) 0 > 0 '4 m w u 9n 0% C4 0 co a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 t7l -4 o-f-qWNWMWWQOOOOOOOOO 40 14 94 'C M' 4 1111 (h Ln 41 H 00 :1 aai > Id u A �4) 0 V N w r- 0 r- r- r� N v m r� r-m_fmOOwOr-OmLnwvrlrl 03: x 0 Aj U'l 10 10 M, 1; v;.; CC; 1; 7, H, id -4 rjll- It li ll� ll� v I:i O C� C� 0 p Ct rl: Ct Ct lc� cl 41 1 A N $4 AJ w w mw H r4 o vw v r- r- Ln v m 0 0 41 0 41 0 A'4 >4 4j 932 A Ok -we 0 Li Y{1: 14 r4 U19 > > 00 NV N m r- Ln v Ln v N wm 01 0 a 0 >1 H -44 > Z 4J --4 41 44iA fn�. r-4 . 40 do do so 00 0 00. do oodoodo P. r� t- -w m Go H 4 V P4 .0 CO, :, j, t,.:kn z z 4.;g4 w m C4 �q %a 41 1z, P4 0 4) 44 too'do .0 4w as co do op to ep dp dp > 044 rd C41 c N 0% en 09 H oc (A co a co -Q F4 th co %o rl N in z co z %D rn 0 m �e,4 C4: %0 H 44 0 tq 13 �r 0 4t 4) 0 WOMOMMN in Aj Ai :v% N N C4 %a F-4 fu CA o 40 Ch -W en cn en -W 0% M C4 ch $4 0 N 10 to c% an in 4 Ln rQ "W m q.0 C4 40 O z Oo 4,0 4) 0 0 r- Ch %0 V ch a% Ln Ch %D 9-1 04 co re .0 m %o F4 %a A (4 0 06 3 u 93. 0 om ilk= dy-,4 .0 > "q 44 •H .0 4 41 � H 0 —N 0 fn co m 0-4 0 in �4 -W 03 $4, CO! en Ch V M 0 a 0 04 W oc V M m Ln 1� 11% P4 14 o 4) F-4 q -A C44 4,� z C4 z 4 L4,�,4 U j 4 41 W $4 #a 0 060 44 V:0 -14 0 W In r1l vi LA r>1-I kfd w 01Id 0 r4 r-4 rd ri 4.•rN1H 4) 4) 0 u A-, ZZZZZZZZ > v >1 Z Z y Id 4) lu a in cm MO C ol 0 9: W 0 00 ;4 44 14 0 do W:g 4) r-I u oto Q %0 0 $4 4 ou 44 0 w 44 Q 14 0 44 'o u Al �-44 -1 0 13 ri 13 04) H 4) A) 0 qq�fIN 3t rl r. r-I 9,13 13 0 V4 41 N 9: 4d 0 tv —44 $4 0 C: J� $4 94 u 0 4 �4 -4 $4 "4 0 4) a LA .4 EA 4) M V E-4 V $4 > I— , ffl�.C: j 4J 0 W 9: 0-4 od t.-00000 14 00040 44 44 Ict 9 44 '15 �r- '0 z 2 " id A19010 04 x x 0 V P.mao 8 4 u 14 ' 10 14, Id4J tT tn w r, m $10 4 4) .14 0 V 14 H 4) u 4; u H 4J 14 14 V id JJ od V 0 L) 90 en m 14 0 Q-' J� rx. i w niq an A h, %on ftzl' l W112, :14111 ft". APPENDIX.E, TIMING AND LOCATION OF CAPI'M CURRENT LOCAL PRACTICES First CIE Update C." vl 11 r j z rs rmiq IMli.7 "vno Prepared Office of Grawth'Kamagment Spring, 1989 soot 036PAGr584' as ;.q v„ , 1 p f . ' Z. APPENDIX E � f TIMING AND LOCATION of CAPITAL II�ROYEMENTS t 9J-5.016(2)(a) requires an analysis of the current local practices that guide the timing and location of construction, extension or. increases in capacity of each public facility. 9J-5.016(2)(e) I requires an analysis of the use of timing and location of capital - improvements to public facilities to support efficient land I development and goals, objectives and policies in the future land ( use element. This analysis must take into consideration plans of {! state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction. By definition, public facilities includes transportation, sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational, parks and recreational, and public health systems or facilities. TRANSPORTATION SYS ETS OR FACILITIES -The Collier County Transportation Services Division and the Naples/Collier County MPO work in a coordinated manner to provide the planning and design of transportation systems and facilities within the County. The primary system of transportation within Collier County is the extensive network of roadways, including 1 1 federal, state, and county roads. This network must be considered as a single working unit when any type of analysis is performed to { evaluate current or projected needs and proposed improvements. The { initial planning processes rely on the projected land use types and time of development along with any ongoing federal, state, or county roadway improvement projects or programs. Using these projections, anticipated traffic volumes and patterns are developed and analyzed 1 for their effects on the existing roadway network, and improvements I or new roadway corridors are proposed to adequately handle the I anticipated traffic. The planning window for this process is f currently held to 5-year and 10-year time frames. For the general municipal area, some very long range planning is also done using a 25-year time frame window. once the long range planning identifies a need within the 10-year window, a design and construction timeline is prepared. This i timeline includes the various phases of engineering design, right-of-way identification and acquisition, permitting, and construction. Due to the numerous variables that must be considered for each roadway, each timeline will be different, but most highway construction projects can typically be completed within a three to four year period. In addition to the long range planning process, monitoring programs iare utilized to determine the actual traffic patterns and volumes. Data from these programs are analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the planning process and identify specific problem areas. By dooK I C�6,►.. ;)C J :r 1 1 " S T t comparing the data collected through'the years,-prof"ectibh%W U'- =«''mechanisms can be amended to reflect the measured situation. " Monitoring programs are also used to provide an indication:cf when a section of roadway is operating insufficiently or is approaching this condition. Both the long range planning and monitoring procedures are utilized to prepare a prioritized transportation capital improvement projects list. This list is annually updated to reflect the most up-to-date needs,.show the anticipated project timelines, and determine when - funding must be incorporated into the County budget to undertake .these projects. While sudden growth spurts in individual areas can create localized problems, the general procedures described above are usually adequate to handle the transportation needs in a timely manner. SEWER SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Utility Services Division hired a consultant to prepare a sanitary sewer facilities development master plan in 1978. This master plan was updated in 1986 in a report entitled "Coastal ;Collier County 201 Facilities Plan Update". This updated 201 Plan was approved as a planning guide by the Board of County Commissioners and provides the Utilities Division with the current ;and projected facilities and populations within the identified sewer 11service area and a schedule of facility expansions necessary to meet the service needs. The Utility Services Division is currently using.the recommended capital improvement program in the 201 Facilities Plan Update to schedule the design and construction of sanitary sewer facilities. !!Since both the existing and proposed sanitary sewer treatment plants and collection systems have been analyzed for projected demands based on population projections within the various planning communities of the Future Land Use Element, the corresponding schedule of necessary capital improvements can be followed as long as the observed development remains consistent with the projections. The 201 Facilities Plan Update identifies when an improvement is needed to be put into service, but does not include any scheduling for design, permitting, or construction. Based on the size and type of facility and the need to obtain state and/or federal funding assistance, the lead time can vary from one year for a small collection pipeline project to five years for a treatment plant or major collection system project. As projects are completed and the development and expansion of the County sanitary sewer system continues, the Utility Services Division will continue to monitor actual growth patterns and, if necessary, adjust the facilities scheduling so that the sanitary sewer facility capacity will be available concurrent with future development. rll `; too( T�3fi v�,� 586 t iA�i •ti`SOLID WAS= SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES r. y The.•Collier County Solid Waste Department is responsible for -the .,4 `design and operational supervision of the solid wastesyateat and facilities within the County. These facilities include -a'==,.,: county -operated sanitary landfill and a contract hauler collection f ' sys tem. eThe present method of facility sizing utilizes the extensive records keeping that has been developed by the Solid Waste Department. The relationship between observed population growth and :solid waste disposal requirements allows this department to project the anticipated solid waste disposal needs for projected populations. Incorporating this information into a long range facility site plan allows the department to design, locate, and construct environmentally sound disposal.facilities, with the capacity for several years of disposal, at an economical savings. Due to the extensive permitting process and time necessary to construct the larger facility sites, a lead time of approximately two years is necessary for landfill disposal sites. At this time, the Solid Waste Department is also preparing a -master plan which will identify and evaluate other methods of solid waste disposal. These methods will vary from recycling to resource 1-jrecovery through thermal reduction. The timing of construction and :;,,implementation of these various methods of solid waste disposal will _ C', be a part of the master plan. DRAIIIAGB SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Water Management Department is responsible for rjthe;scheduling of construction and maintenance projects and programs for the public drainage systems and facilities throughout the : unincorporated portions of the County. Past practice has generally been to coordinate the construction of any new canals with the Collier County Transportation Department's road construction .program. At_the present time, the Water Management Department has contracted •:•with a consultant to prepare a Water Management Master Plan for the entire County. This plan will identify and officially establish the boundaries for the various watersheds or basins, analyze the condition and capacity of the existing drainage/water management facilities within each basin, identify the needed improvements to the various facilities to achieve the desired level of service standards, and develop a program for the phased improvement of the entire County's water management system to produce an environmentally sound network of facilities that can be achieved through an established capital improvement program. The Master Plan will be based on the various land use types identified on the Future Land Use map and will provide for the necessary water management facilities assuming maximum allowed development for each land use type. eooK 03fi►,��,587 M to the completion of the Water Management Master. Plaii,- a "series of individual basin plans will be completed to specifically analyze and design the facilities or improvements needed for each basin where necessary major improvements have been identified by the ,.Master Plan. These basin plans will incorporate any proposed improvements by other state or local agencies and the South Florida ,Water Management District. Current regulatory and fiscal implication practices for constructing or modifying drainage/water management facilities require a lead time of approximately one year for design and permitting and six months to two years for construction. POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES In- .The Collier County Utility Services Division hired a consultant to prepare a potable water facilities development master plan in 1985 and 1986. This document is contained in two volumes entitled "Phase I Water Master Plan for Western Collier County" and "Phase II Water Master Plan for Western Collier County". This Water Master Plan was approved as a planning guide by the Board of County Commissioners and provides the Utility Services Division with the projected growth within the identified water service area and a schedule of facility expansions necessary to meet the service needs. The Utility Services Division is currently using the scheduled capital improvement program in the Water Master Plan. Since both the existing and proposed water treatment and distribution system have been analyzed for projected demands based on population projections within the various planning communities of the Future Land Use Element, the corresponding schedule of necessary capital improvements can be followed as long as the observed development remains consistent with the projections. The Water Master Plan lists when an improvement is needed to be put into service, but does not include any scheduling for design, permitting, or construction. Based on the size and type of facility, the lead time can vary from one year for a small pipeline project to five years for a treatment plant or wellfield construction project. As projects are completed and the development and expansion of the County potable water system continues, the Utility Services Division will continue to monitor actual growth patterns and, if necessary, adjust the facilities scheduling so that the potable water supply will be available concurrent with future development. EDUCATICUAI. SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The District School Board of Collier County of the Collier County Public School System is responsible for the planning, operation, and expansion of the educational systems -and facilities. This Board utilizes a five-year Comprehensive Educational Plan which is updated annually to identify the projected needs and anticipated funding requirements. In addition to providing adequate school facilities, this plan also includes the necessary support facilities such as transportation, administration, warehouse, and maintenance. Yr. ^.1 t ' -'The process for developing this five-year Comprehensive Educational � Flan incorporates several continual planning and evaluation, programs. The Florida Department of Education has established some c,iidelines for determining when hew or expanded facilities are needed. These include a five-year survey of existing facilities to evaluate their adequacy. If a rapid increase in student -loading creates an overcrowded condition and projections indicate that there Ls not enough time to institute a five-year survey, there are provisions for conducting a spot survey. Proper planning is essential in this phase of development since a school facility design and construction program requires a lead time ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 years, depending on the type of facility needed. in addition to examining the condition of the facilities, the School Board conducts a continual land evaluation and acquisition program. This program uses the population projections for the County to determine which areas will develop a sufficient student base to justify the construction of schools. once the projected need is identified, potential land sites are identified and procedures implemented to obtain title to the land either by purchase, trade agreements, or receipt of contributions. Potential sites are usually identified and obtained a minimum of three years before the construction of facilities is proposed. PARKS AND RECREATIONAL SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department of the Public services Division is responsible for the planning, operation, and expansion of the County's recreational needs. A broad based recreation plan has been prepared whereby the County can provide for many of the recreational needs of the citizens through the development of community parks located near the various population centers. At the present, there is no formal method for evaluating capital improvements. Projects are suggested by staff, the general public, the Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Board, the County Manager, or even the individual Commissioners of the Board of County Commissioners. This informal method of recommendation has proven to be very useful in providing the desired recreational facilities within the overall guidelines of the County's recreational plan. 'PUBLIC MALTH SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Health Department is responsible for the public health facilities operated by the County. The planning and development of the facilities and programs is generally conducted in response to legislated requirements and directions from the State Health Department. Planning projections are used to predict potential health problem areas, but the department is usually not able to obtain funding assistance until the problems actually develop. While this method of operation is reactive rather than proactive, the usually rapid response for funding assistance allows the department to operate effectively in meeting the health needs of the County. eou 1 P��!589 APPENDIX D ;.; sPVBLIC EDUCATION EZALTH i COUNTY 72MLASTRUCTURE1 V.1 ri "n Prepared by Growth Management Department First CIE Update SpringR 1989 590 It i lltl* Xv i APPENDIX D r � Revised Spring, 1989 v l frS APPENDIX D kY; COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA. FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 TO 1993-94 INTRODUCTION The Collier County School Board provides for public education within the County including incorporated and unincorporated areas. The School Board has no regulatory authority over land' use, however, it does influence land use and public facility decisions through the siting of schools. The responsibility of Collier County under the Growth Management Act is to review the School Board's Capital Improvement program to determine consistency with the comprehensive plan and the impact on the ' County's level of Service Standards. In addition, this is pursuant to Rule 9J-5.016(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.) which reads "The geographic service area and location of major system components for the public education and public health systems within the local government's jurisdiction shall ba identified." Also, 9J-5.016(2)(d) requires the County to determine "The impact of new or improved public educational and public health care systems and facilities on the provision of infrastructure." The purpose of this appendix is to analyze the School Board's Capital Improvement's impact upon the County's infrastructure. j PROCEDURE Data Collection r �.: The following steps were used to accumulate the data for this + section: a a. Existing schools were inventoried; school sites and service areas were located on maps. b. School Board land holdings were inventoried and proposed acquisitions were noted. C. The School Board Capital Improvement Program was reviewed to determine impacts on the infrastructure of the County. j----------------------------------------------------------------- Note: This analysis only includes public education facilities. There are no local public health facilities within t .i Collier County. i �. Adr Page 2 soo>< 036PAGE59 x APPENDIX D Revised Spring, 1989, k x e 3 laor IFS ANALYSIS -,The location of existing schools, future schools, and capital'; improvements were reviewed to determine the impact on the level of service standards established by Collier County Government for the following facilities: Roads Sanitary Sewers Potable Water Solid Waste, Drainage, and Parks and Recreation. Existing School Inventory and Service Area: Collier County is divided into four (4) service districts: Naples, Immokalee, Non -Transportable, and Everglades City. There are fourteen (14) elementary schools, five (5) middle schools, and four (4) high schools, and a K-12 facility. Refer to Maps LU-83, LU-84, and LU-85 found on pages LU-II-128 through LU-II-130 of the Future Land Use Element for the service areas: and location of these facilities. NAPLES SERVICE AREA: Elementary Schools: Middle Schools: High Schools: EVERGLADES CITY SERVICE AREA: Everglades City School: IMMOKALEE SERVICE AREA: Early Child School: Elementary Schools: Middle Schools: Avalon, Big Cypress, Golden Gato, Golden Terrace, Lake Park, Naples Park, Poinciana, Seagate, Shadcwlawn and Tommie Barfield. East Naples, Golden Gate,!:,.i Gulfview and Pine Ridge. Barron Collier, Lely and Naples. K-12 Bethune Education Center Highlands, Lake Trafford, Pinecrest, Village Oaks-. Immokalee Middle High Schools: Immokalee High NON -TRANSPORTABLE The student may:attend the: SERVICE AREA: school of their choice. Each individual school service area boundary changes as additional schools are constructed or as a facility is expanded. The four (4) service districts will remain the same for the five (5) and ten (10) year time frame. BOOK 036ParE592 APPENDIX D Revised Spring, 1989 . k r ? { + School Board's Land Holdings and site Acquisitions: All schools are within the designated Urban areas. The Urban areas were used as the data base for the level of service standards that were set. The schools impact is reflected in the standard. The School Board owns nine (9) additional sites. Every section 16 of each township was given to the School Board. only two (2) section 16 parcels remain. They are 16 and #7. Their location in the County is such that environmental constraints will now allow them to be developed. Parcels #2 and #3 are an acre or less and, therefore, could not be developed for a school. Parcels #1 and #5 will not be developed because of their remote locations. Parcels #4, #8, #9 and #10 have a possibility of being developed. Presently, parcel 14, 18 and #10 cannot be developed because of inadequate infrastructure. There are no plans in the five (5) year period to develop these three (3) parcels. Should plans to develop the three (3) sites be made, the County would have to review them carefully for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. A new Elementary School is under construction on parcel #10. This is merely a review of the School Board's land holdings. An in-depth analysis of each parcel's impact will not be done until a parcel is identified in the School Board's Capital Improvement Program for development. The analysis and conclusions will be handled under the appropriate capital improvement program review. Collier County School Board Capital Improvement Program Tho School Board's Capital Improvoment Program reflects tho assessment of need to provide for the school population. The program's main objectives are to accommodate growth through expansion of existing facilities or building schools. It also plans for the maintenance and preservation of existing facilities. Collier County is estimating an enrollment increase of approximately 700 to 1,000 school children per year over the next five (5) years. The largest increase is occurring within the elementary school age population. The capital Improvement Program reflects a response to the need, by planning for four (4) elementary schools to be constructed within the five (5) year time frame. The middle schools are adequate but will need some improvements and expansion to accommodate the elementary children as they move into the middle school category. The existing four (4) high schools will meet the needs of the high school population within the five (5) year time frame. Additions may be needed in the 1995/96 fiscal year and another high school may need to be built within the ten (10) year planning window. Page 4 BOOK 03t1 PA6E 593 1� byy APPENDIX D Revised Spring, 1989 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY FOR IMMOKALEE/EVERGLADES AREA; Elementary Schools Pinecrest Elementary is scheduled for an addition in FY91/92. This addition will increase the student population by forty (40) students. It was determined that it will not impact the County's level of service standards. Highland Elementary is scheduled to expand its facility in FY91/92. Lake Trafford Elementary is scheduled to expand in FY 89/90. Each of the School's capacity will.be increased by 300 students. It was determined that these capital improvements will have no impact on the County's level of service standards. A new elementary school is planned for 1993/94. The site has not been identified, therefore, impact cannot be determined. Middle Schools A new Im.-nokalee Middle School will be constructed in FY 89/90 to replace the current facility. The new facility will be adjacent to the old one and will therefore have no additional impact on level of service standards. High Schools Renovations and improvements are scheduled for the Bethune Education Center, Immokaleo High School and Evergladas City. These improvements will not impact the County's level of service standards for any of the above references County provided 41 facilities. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY FOR NAPLES AREA Elementary Schools Renovations and improvements are scheduled for Avalon, Golden Gate, Poinciana, Seagate, and Shadowlawn. Expansion of media is scheduled at Avalon. These improvements will have no impact on level of uervice standards. Tommie Barfield, on Marco Island, will have four (4) classrooms added. To accommodate growth, three (3) future schools are planned and one (1) is under construction. Golden Terrace Elementary school will open on Parcel 010 of tho School Board's Land Holdings in August, 1989. The construction of the school at this site was reviewed for level of service compliance. Isle of Capri Road is a major arterial and Golden Gate Parkway is a minor arterial. These segments are most likely to be used to service the school. A trip generating study by the County staff indicated that traffic generated by the school will not reduce the level of service. The School will be provided water and newer service by Florida Cities. The system will be designed to meet County Engineering Standards. Florida Cities will have enough treatment capacit• to serve the school. The County Landfill projections indicate that there is sufficient capacity to handle the solid waste generated by the school. Page 5 600x 036 wE 594 ', W. i 4 APPENDIX D E Revised Spring, 1989 The elementary school is designed to provide limited amounts of recreational facilities and open space. The school will not generate any extra demand on the County Park system. Drainage is not a problem in the area, however, the design will -be -reviewed by the County Water Management Department. From this review, it was determined that the elementary school can be constructed on Parcel #10 without any negative impact on the level of service standards set by Collier County. The sites for the other three (3) schools, to be constructed in FY 89/90, 91/92 and 93/94, have not been identified, therefore, impact cannot be determined. Middle Schools Renovations and additions are scheduled for East Naples and Gulf - view. These improvements will increase the student population by approximately 30 students. It was determined that the level of service standard will not be affected.. Pine Ridge Middle School is scheduled to expand in FY90/91 which will increase its capacity by 400 students. An analysis of the expansion on the County's level of service standard was done. It was determined it will not lower the County's level of service standards. A new middle school is planned for construction in FY93/94. The site for the school has not been identified, therefore, no impact can yet be determined. High Schools Barron Collier, Naples and Lely have renovations and classroom F- additions scheduled. These capital improvements will not significantly increase the student population. it was determined that there will be no impact on the County's level of service standards. Exceptional Student Education Programs The State has mandated that the School Board provide classrooms for the exceptional child (mentally or physically handicapped). Additional classrooms will be provided at existing schools. Specific schools have not been determined. However, the number of students will be small and should have no impact on the level of service. Page 6 ROOK c 36 PAcE 595 1- 1 APPENDIX F COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCING PLAN First CIE Update (Spring, 1989) Prepared by Office of Growth. -Management,:-:: Finance Committee )rTionfinil .11 elrfT h!q:frr'ib at "L,-InuoD a 596 DA Ru M M COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Financing Plan First Update (Spring 1989) I. Objectives Doc.Ref: APP-F.CIE Between January, 1987 and August 1988 the citizens of Collier County joined the County staff and Board of County Commissioners in 197 public meetings, workshops, and hearings. As a result of this community effort, standards of service were set for thirteen (13) types of public facilities. These Level of Service Standards identified in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvement Element define the quality of life and environment that the citizens of Collier County want to maintain as the Growth Management Plan is implemented through the coming years. in order to maintain the Level of Service Standards, eliminate! deficiencies and provide new facilities for future growth, the' County will need to improve or construct $275,917,000 of infra' - structure during the period FY89/90 - FY93/94. In order to make this Capital Improvement Program viable and realistic, the Board of County Commissioners must approve a balanced funding plan from existing and available revenue sources. The existing situation at the outset of this financing plan if;all available capital revenues were committed to the CIE during the period covered by the CIE can be summarized as follows: Recommended CIE Projects FY90-94 $275,9171,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: FDOT 5-year work program $ 4,865,000 1 Uncommitted Carry Forward :4,954,000 Projected Restricted Revenues 105,744,000 FY90-94 Utility Revenue Bonds - New 39,788,000 .Issues Capital Revenue Fund 1.0000 mill 68,046,000 FY90-94 Stormwater Utility Fee Bonds 26,629,000 Gas Tax Revenue Bonds 9,000,000 259,026 Min. Additional Revenues Needed $ 16,8911 II. Financinq Plan Policies ,00 This financing plan for generating the additional needed revenues is predicated on the adoption by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners of several policies. The policies reflec� the spirit and intent of the 1985 Growth Management Act, equitable distribution of costs among taxpayers, and sound fiscal policy'. Spring, 1989 - 1 - 600K C'3F PA,4 597 trx Doc.Ref: APP-F.CIE Policy #1 - Existing facility deficiencies measured'againsCrthle established Level of Service Standards for the current population will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. A Policy 42 - Where the need for a new facility is identified with the projected influx of new residents during the planning period FY90-94, the revenues to build that facility will be generated by impact fees to the extent practical. These impact fees will be set based on precedents and rates existing in other Florida counties with similar demographics and growth patterns, but not at a level which would have an adverse impact on business activity in the County. Policy 43 - The County's existing 1.000 mill levy for Capiiil' Projects Revenue will be maintained at a minimun of the current level through FY94 for support of both CIE and non -CIE projects. Surplus funds from the 1.000 mill.levy not needed for CIE projects will be applied towards other capital projects. Additional capital project needs which are not in the CIE may require additional ad valorem tax or debt funding during the period covered by this plan. Policy #4 - Certain large scale projects of significant County- wide impact and cost would, if funded with current ad valorem taxes in the year of construction, result in an unacceptable millage rate. These projects will be proposed for General obligation Bonding. The electorate will be asked through referendum to approve the borrowing of funds for the projects and the levy of ad valorem taxes to pay the resulting debt service. The defeat of a referendum on any or all of the projects will result in a lowering of the Level of Service Standard for related facilities. Policy #5 - The Enterprise Funds, i.e. Water, Sewer and Solid waste are operated on the "service business" concept that the user pays for the service. Therefore, no general or intergovernmental tax revenues will be used for capital projects within these funds. CIE Projects within these funds will be financed by water and sewer impact fees and user fees, Clean Water Act grants and/or' loans, landfill fees, and revenue bonds supported by the appropriate levels of user fees. Policy #6 - During the implementation period of the CIE of the Growth Management Plan, the assessment ratio for property valuation for the levy of ad valorem taxes will remain at 100% of "Just value" in accordance with Chapter 193.011 F.S. Policy #7 - Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues of 13%. whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self imposed Spring, 1989 2 - C 598 Doc. Ref : APP-F. GIE level of restraint. This policy will provide bonding capacity ..sufficient to meet the needs identified in the CIE Financing•Plan. y _'. Bondable revenues are defined as ad valorem taxes and State shared revenues, specifically, gas taxes and the half -cent sales -taxi" The Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge (7th Cent) would also be included if it should be adopted by the Collier electorate to fund planned or future projects to maintain adopted levels of service. The Enterprise Funds operate under utility revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. Policy 18 - Collier County will place a referendum before the voters in the Spring of 1990 to approve the levy of the Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge (7th Cent). If approved by the electorate, revenues generated will be used to construct facilities identified in the CIE through a combination'of.bonding and cash flow. Any bonds issued based on the pledge of this revenue will be governed by Policy #7 of this Financing Plan. Revenue generated in excess of identified needs in the CIE -will be used to provide non -CIE facilities and improvements as provided for in Chapter 212.055(3)F.S. III. Financing Plan Detail County Arterial & Collector Roads Planned Road Construction Projects FY90-94 $ 73,503;000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: Gas Tax Revenue Bonds $ 9,000,000 Gas Taxes 26,799,000 Impact Fees 20,854,000 56',653,000 Additional Revenues Needed 16,850-,000 Recommended Additional Revenue Source -'. 7th Cent Sales Tax Revenue ''`= 1`6,850'•,000 Net $ - 0 rr, Comments._ Gas tax and impact fee revenues will not be adequate in the short term (5 years) to fund necessary improvements during the period FY90-94 needed to maintain the service standards as measured by traffic volumes adopted in the Traffic Circulation Element. State Roads Network Needed State Road Improvements FY90-94 ; 431577,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: FDOT Funding (5-year work plan) $ 4,865,000 Developer Contributions 1,000,000 51865,000 Additional Revenue Needed 37,712,000 Recommended Additional Revenue Source: ^ 7th Cent Sales Tax Revenue 37;712,000 .: Net Spring, 1989 - 3 - :__. 600K 036 PASS 599 , � ]i✓' .jd - Doc.Ref: APP-F.CIE Comments +. The continued uninterrupted development of Collier County,is••,.'. dependent upon the maintenance of LOS standards for state.roads adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of the CIE. Current state funding contained in the FDOT 5-year work plan does not provide the minimum improve- ents necessary to maintain concurrency. Water and Sewer System Planned Water and Sewer Projects FY90-94 ; 68,711,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: System Development Fees ; 22,200,000 Grants 4,900,000 Uncommitted Carry Forwafd 1,823,000 Revenue Bonds - New Issues 39,788,000 68,711,000 Net ;: - 0 - Comments New Utility Revenue Bonds are fundable with projected.revenue increases averaging 13% annually through FY94 as a result of the phase -in of the East and South County collection systems accompanied by annual increases in the customer base. Solid Waste Planned Landfill Projects FY90-94 LESS Existing Revenue Source: Landfill Tipping Fees ; 10,185,000 10 185,000 Net ; 0 - Emergency Medical Service_ Planned EMS Unit Construction Projects FY90-94 ; 978,000 LESS Existing Revenue Source: Ad Valorem Taxes 978,000 Net ; 0 - Jail Planned Jail Expansion Projects FY90-94 ; 9,636,000 LESS Existing Revenue Source: None Identified 0' - Additional Revenue Needed 9,636,000 Recommended Revenue Source ._._." 7th Cent Sales Tax Revenue 9,636,000 Net ; 0 - 0, Comments r. i; V, 'Due to.the impact of this project in the budget year.*89-90, dash flow from the pay-as-you-go 1.000 mill Capital Revenue Fund is not sufficient to fund this project without depleting the Fund entirely. Spring, 1989 - 4 - 600Kr �WaAFIE Doc.Ref: APP-F.CIE , Libraries , '._ Planned Library Construction and Book ; 5,589,000 Collection FY90-94 Reserve for Future Protects �•488'000 "='LESS Existing Revenue Source: 6,0 Library Impact Fee ;"5,498,000:- a ;�- State Aid for Libraries 400,000 ` t 00"Net Trust Fund 179,000 6,077,000 Government Buildings Planned Construction of Facilities FY90-94 ; .8,949,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: State Grant/Health Building ; 250,000 State Funds/Agriculture Building 135,000 Uncommitted Carry Forward 3,131,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 5,433,000 .8;949;000 KC Net- �' Parks and Recreation Planned Parks Const. & Land Acquisition FY90-94 $ 27,672,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: Parks Impact Fee $12,501,000 1 Boating Improvement Program 843,000• Ad Valorem Taxes 7,328,000 20,672,000 '+ Additional Revenue Needed 7,000,000 Recommended Additional Revenue Source General Obligation Bond/Regional Park Land 7,000;000 Net ; - 0 - Comments GG.; ; A general obligation bond issue is proposed for referendum." -:Funds Fr. raised by the Bond issue would be used to purchase'700'acres'-df land for a Regional Park. Disapproval by the electorate would result in a lowering of the Level of Service Standard for this facility. Drainage Planned Drainage & Water Mgmt. Projects FY90-94 ; 26,629,000 LESS Existing Revenue Source Stormwater Utility Fee Bonds 26,629;000 Net ; - :0: ,..AA a t y Spring, 1989 tXt�.T :.! - 5 - IV; - Financino Plan Surmary 9k CI8 Pro ects FY90-94 county Arterial& Collector Roads State Roads Network water & Sewer System Solid waste Emergency Medical Service Jail Expansion Libraries Government Buildings Parks and Recreation Drainage and Water Mgmt. Totals Revenue Sources FY90-94 Gas Taxes FDOT Funding Gas Tax Revenue Bonds Uncommitted Carry Forward State/Federal Grants User Fees Ad Valorem Taxes General Obligation Bonds Stormwater Utility Fee Bonds Utility Revenue Bonds Impact Fees 7th Cent Sales Tax Miscellaneous Totals Projects Funded f 56,6�,000 5,865,000 68,711,000 10,185,000 978,000 0 6,077,000 8,949,000 20,672,000 26,629,000 $2 4, 19,000 DOC.Refr APP-F.CIE ~!% t �r } ►rjr Projects.-'._,,,,, jTotal Unfunded . ,,,,, . o acts 163�Sbb,4..73, 37,712,000 43,577,000 0 68,711,000 0 10,185,000 0 978,000 9,636,000 9,636,000 0 6,077,000 0 8,949,000 7,000,000 27,672,000 0 $r8,o 26 629 000 Existing $ 26,799,000 $ 4,865,000 9,000,000 4,954,000 6,528,000 10,185,000 13,739,000 0 26,629,000 39,788,000 61,053,000 0 1,179.000 $204,719,000 Summary Propose 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,000,000 0 0 0 64,198,000 0 $ 71,198,000 Revenues $ 26,799,000 4,865,000 9,000,000 4,954,000 6,528,000 10,185,000 13,739,000 .7,000,000 26,629,000 39,78$,000 61,053,000 64,198,000 1,179.000 $275,917,000 This proposed financing plan for the FY90-94 CIE of the Growth Management Plan is based on the application of revenues from thirteen (13) current and proposed sources to accomplish the $276M plan within the eight (8) policies outlined. The first priority of the Collier County Capital Improvement Program over the next five (5) years must be to complete projects in the Capital Improvement Element. Additionally, there are numerous capital projects of vital importance to the maintenance of high standards of service to Collier citizens which are under construction, pinnned, or yet to be developed that will need to be funded. Spring, 1989 6 - dooK ` ME A'! k i; M Doc. Ref: APP-F.CIE. This CIE Financing Plan represents a p prudent, achievable;'andt Sr equitable approach to obtaining the revenues needed for both CIE and non -CIE projects. Policy 03 of this plan iterates a ^` commitment to maintaining the existing 1.0000 mill Capital -Revenue `..` fir✓' Fund levy through FY94. This plan, if adopted, would provide a 20/80 split of this revenue between CIE and non -CIE projects. Projected Capital Revenue @ 1.000 mill FY90-94 $ 68,046,000 LESS CIE Capital Projects Funding 13,739,000 Available for Non -CIE, CIE Additions and $ 54,307,000 Contingencies It is important not to commit all projected revenue from the ' '1.0000 mill Capital Revenue Fund to CIE projects. The proposed ratio allows for an average of $10.8M annually for all capital demands not included in the CIE. To commit more of this particular revenue source to the CIE would severely hamper the County'S flexibility to respond to other capital needs as they arise without the possible need for a tax increase. A key component of this CIE Financing Plan, as iterated in Policy N2, is the imposition of impact fees when applicable to the attainment of growth related Level of Service Standards. Impact Fees currently in place will provide 22.1% of the funds to complete the projects in this plan. The single most critical feature of this CIE Financing Plan is the "';-reliance on the revenue anticipated from the Seventh Cent. Sales ' Tax to make it viable. Without this new revenue source the choices open to the Board of County Commissioners under CIE policy 1.2.11 and other policies adopted in the Growth Management Plan include the following actions: 1. Eliminate projects and lower LOSS's through a plan amendment. 2. Cancel or delay Category B and non -CIE projects. 3. Levy additional property taxes. 4. Delay the issuance of development orders in areas of the County with insufficient capacity in Category A facilities to allow a "catch-up" period. Spring, 1989 - 7 - dooK , 036 racE 603 ..4i r� •N� , �. b : • . .:Lam i