Resolution 1994-677
SEP r 3 ..
RESOLUTION NO. 94--61]
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY
DETERMINING THAT REVISIONS TO THE
BERKSHIRE LAKES DEVELOPMENT ORDER 83-1,
AS AMENDED, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION REQUIRING FURTHER
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida approved Development Order 83-1 (the
Development Order) on August 16, 1983, which approved a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as Berkshire
LAKES; AND
WHEREAS, Section 380.06(19) (f)2, Florida Statutes.
requires that proposed changes to a previously approved
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) be submitted by the
developer to the local government, the regional planning
council and the state land planning agency; and
WHEREAS, submittal of the proposed changes was made to
the appropriate public authorities; and
WHEREAS, section 380.06(19)(f)5, Florida statutes,
requires that the local government shall determine whether or
not the proposed change to the previously approved DRI
development order constitutes a substantial deviation
requiring further Development-of-Regional-Impact review; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County has reviewed and considered the report and
recommendations of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council (SWFRPC) and held on September: 13" 199. public
hearing on the petition; and
WHEREAS, by separate action the Board of County
Commissioners will cause Berkshire Lakes PUD Development
lOOK OOOn'it 78
-1-
SEP r 3 ..
Order to be amended to reflect the proposed revisions which
do not constitute a substantial deviation requiring further
Development-of-Regional-Impact review;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier county, Florida that:
The proposed revisions to the Berkshire Lakes
Development Order Number 83-1, as amended, as
described in Petition DOA-94-3, the Notification of a
Proposed Change to a previously Approved Development
of Regional Impact (DRI), noted as Exhibit "A" and
hereto made a part of this Resolution do not
constitute a substantial deviation requiring further
Development of Regional Impact review.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded
in the minutes of this Board.
Saunders
Commissioner
offered the
foregoing Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by
Matthews
Commissioner
and upon roll call, the
vote was:
AYES: Commissioner Saunders~ Commissioner: Matthews~ Commissioner:
Norris, Commissioner Volpe and Commissioner Constantine
NAYS:
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
l3th
Done this
day of
September
, 1994.
ATTEST: ..',: .;
DWIGHT E. ,~ROC}(, CLERK
~:~:~&~ ~AL
SUFFICIENCY:
-Y1i~~~ . ?n .1.Jw.u~
MARJoRfi~. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
PUD-83-1 (7) /DOA-94-3/11602aODK OOO'A'i( 79
-2-
SEP 1 3 ..
..
j
FORM RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGB-l
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DMSION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
904-488-4925
NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSFD CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
DEVELOPMmIT OF REGIONAL IMPACt' (DRl)
SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUrES
Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal ilf-a proposed change to
a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and
the state land planning agency according to this form.
1.
I,
Barbara H. Cawlev. AICP
, the undersigned owner/authorized
representative or WillIam T. Hlr2S , herehy give notice or a proposed change to
a previously approved Development or Regional Impact In accordance with
Subsection 380.06(19), florida Statutes. In supportthereor,l submIt the'rollowing
lntormatlon concem1n~ the Berkshire Lakes development, which lnCormation Is
true and coITed to the best of my knowledge. I have submItted today, under
separate cover, copies of this completed noMatton to Collier County , to the
Soufhwest Florida
Regional Planning Councll, and to the Bureau of State
Planning, Department of Community Affairs.
r ;/
-<<..J;.e.
(Signature)
aOOK ogp n';( BO
1 ~lC..L 111~
(Date)
l/OU904.4llllOOl9._
. REVISED 5/31/94
Exhibit "A"
'".,...01111001.,..,
aODK 000 P4'. 81
11..1..4 'n!'"
SEP 1 3 ..
2. AppUcsnt (name, address, phone).
William T. Higgs
2666 Airport Road South
Naples, FL 33962
(813) 775-2230
3. Authorized Agent (name, address, phone).
Barbara H. Cawley, AICP
Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc.
Wilson Professional Center
Suite 200
3200 Bailey Lane
Naples, FL 33942
(813) 649-4040
4. Locatlon (City, County, Townshlp/Range/Sectlon) or approved DR! and proposed
change.
The property is located in Section 32 and 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East; and
Section 5, Township 50 South, Range 26 East; Collier County, Florida.
5. Provide a complete description or the proposed change. Include any proposed
changes to the plan of development; phasing, additlonallands, commencement date,
bund-out date, development order conditlons and requirements, or to the
representatlonscontained In eitber tbe development order or the Application ror
Development Approval.
The applicant is requesting 10 amend Map H to reconfigure the residential unit design and
add one additional access point and to amend the Land Use Schedule 10 rencet a change
to the unit count for the Berkshire Lakes DRI. The amendment will modify the use of
Parcel E by allowing additional single family units to be placed on it. Concurrently, the
multi-family unit count will be reduced. No changes are being made to the other parcels
in Berkshire I..alces since the project is substantially built out. The revised unit count
merely reflects the market conditions for Collier County.
The Substantial Deviation Chart, Table I, shows that Berkshire Lakes is approved for
4,200 units (950 single family and 3,250 multi-family). This is also renected on Maps
H, H-l and H-2. The proposed amendment will modify the unit count to convert 306
multi-family units to 306 single family units. The proposed total unit count, therefore,
/
,
i
.I
,
.'
,
/
,
,"SEP1 3 t9M
:'
.'
is 1,156 single family units and 2,944 multi-family units. The total unit count remains
4,200 units. Please see Map H-3 and the revised Land Use Schedule, attached as Table
2.
Map H-3 also shows the one additional access road proposed on the southern boundary
of Parcel E (Radio Road). This entrance road complies with Collier County's access
management standards and lines up with the entrance to the Plantation PUD south of the
project.
As required by Chapter 380.06, the following analysis of the impacts of the proposed
change was made:
Wastewater: Berkshire Lakes is serviced by Collier County sewage treatment facilities.
The conversion of 306 multi-family units to 306 single family units will have no
appreciable impact on thc.amounl of wastewater treatment required.
Water SuW1y: Berkshire Lakes water supply is served by Collier County Utilities. The
conversion of the 306 units will have minimal impact in terms of water use. The original
ADA estimated each unit will consume 100 gallons per capita per day. The number of
people estimated per dwelling-unit was estimated at 2.5 for multi-family and 3.0 for
single family. The change will require an additional 15,300 gallons per day of potable
water based on this formula. The change in unit mix will not have a significant impact
in terms of water demand.
Solid Waste:' In the ADA, solid waste was estimated by residential units at 10 pounds
per unit per day. A conversion of 306 units will not change the amount of solid waste
generated by the project.
Education: The change in unit mix will have no impact on the number of students
generated by Berkshire Lakes.
Health Care: The proposed amendment docs not change the health care impact generated
by the development.
Environmental: No area that was specifically set aside for endangered or threatened
species is being changed. The proposed change to modify the residential unit type mix
and redesign Parcel E win have no environmental impact.
Tran$pOrtation: Please see the attached Traffic Impact Statement.
BOOK (lJ(),~~ B2
SI) 1/94.0111\001 '_
-3-
...... smIM
\
',\
"\
i
I
\
SEP 1 3 ,.
(
Indicate such chanles on the project master site plan, supplementing with other
detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional InConnatlon may be requested by the
Department or any revlewlnl agency to clariCy the nature oC the change or the
resulting Impacts.
Please see revised Master Plan for Parcel E (Map H-3). Maps H-l and H-2 remain
unchanged. A revised Land Use Schedule is attached as Table 2.
6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Detennlnatlon Chart Cor all land use
types approved In the development. It no change Is proposed or has occurred,
Indlcate no cbange.
See the attached Substantial Deviation Chart (fable I).
7. List aU the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate Identification
numbers) oC an modifications or amendments to the originally approved DR!
development order that have been adopted by the local &overnment, and provide a
brleC description oC. the previous changes (I.e., any inConoatlon not already
addressed in the Substantial Deviation Detennlnatlon Chart). lIas there been a
change In local government jurisdiction Cor any portion oC the development since the
last approval or development order was Issued? Ir so, has the annexing local
government adopted a new DR! development order Cor the project?
The original Development Order #83-1 was adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County on August 16, 1983. Resolution Number 85-165 was
adopted by the Board on August 6, 1985. This amendment changed the Hurricane
Evacuation stipulations by modifying the minimum floor elevation from 12.8 n. m.s.1.
to 11.2 ft. N.G.V.D. . The Development Order was amended again on June 17, 1986,
by Resolution Number 86-110. This Resolution amended the Hurricane Evacuation
stipulations contained in the Development Order. Resolution Number 87-275 was
adopted on November 17, 1987. This Resolution stated that the amendments to the PUr>
fur Ilcrkshlre 1...1kes did not cun,litute a lubSI.1ntial deviatlun tu the Develupment Order.
On June 11,1991, the Board adopted Resolution Number 91-448, which again stated that
the changes to the Berkshire Lakes PUD did not constitute a substantial deviation to the
Development Order. Development Order 92-5, Resolution Number 92-676 was adopted
on December 22, 1992. This amendment changed the name of the developer of the
property and added language stating that all amendments to the PUD document are
included by reference to the Development Order.
There has been. no change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the
development since the development order was adopt~ in 1983.
St31~IIIIOlI"._
,ooK OOOW.! B3
a..... Snll94
,r
SEP 1 3 '9~
8. Describe any lands purcbased or optioned wltbln 1/4 mUe of the original DRI site
subsequent to the original approval or Issuance of the DRI development ordcr.
Identify such land, Its size, Intended use, and adjacent non-project Innd uses within
1/2 mile on a project master site plan or other map.
No lands within 1/4 mile of the original DRI have been purchased or optioned by the
developer.
9. Indicate It the proposed change Ls less than 40% (cumulatlvcly wltb other prcvlous
changes) of any of the criteria lIsted In Paragrapb 380.06(19)(b), F10rlda Statutes.
All of the previous changes to Berkshire Lalces have been adjustments to the unit count
and minor adjustments to the land use schedule. None of the previous changes resulted
in a substantial deviation.
The proposed amendment, cumulatively with previous changes, generates an eight point
six (8.6%) percent additional impact in terms of traffic generation, using the traffic
generation number from the original ADA. This 8.6% is S7" of the IS" threshold in
subparagraph 380.06(19)(b)IS but does not exceed the threshold. Therefore, the change
is presumed not to create a substantial deviation subject to further DRI review. The
attached TIS shows that a substantial deviation has not occurred since no facility will be
impacted at S" and have its level of service lowered below the adopted level of service.
No other substantial deviation thresholds are involved in this Notice of Change.
Do you belleve thLs notification of cbange proposes a cbange wblcb meets tbe criteria
of Subparagrapb 380.06(19)(e)2., florida Statutes?
YES
NO
x
10. Does the proposed cbange result In a cbange to tbe bulldout dnte or any phasing
dnte of the project? If so, Indicate the proposed new buUdout or phasing dates.
No change in the build out date or the phasing date is proposed.
11. Will the proposed cbange require an amendment to tbe local government
comprebenslve plan?
No change to the Collier County Growth Management Plan will be required.
Sl3119f.01l11OO1 '_
... CllOf"t:! B4
-5-
In'" 'nIlM
~
SEP 1 3 .
Provide the 10Uowln& lor Incorporation Into such an amended development order, pursuant
to Subsections 380.06(15), florida Statutes, and 9J-1.025, florida Administrative Code:
11. An updated master site plan or other map or the development portraying and
dlstlnplshlng the proposed changes to the previously approved DR! or development
order conditions.
Please see Map H-3.
13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(1), florida Statutes, Include the precise language
that Is be1n& proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development
order. This languale should address and quantiry:
a. AU proposed specific chanles to the nature, phasing, and build-out date or
the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to
commitments and representations In the AppUcatlon ror Development
Approval; to the acreale attributable to each described proposed change or
land use, open space, areas ror preservation, green belts; to structures or to
other Improvements Including locations, square rootage, number or units; and
other major characteristics or components or the proposed change;
Please see revised Development Order.
b. An updated legal description or the property, It any project acreage Islhas
been added or deleted to the previously approved plan 01 development;
No acreage has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of
development.
c. A proposed amended development order deadline ror commencing physical
development or the proposed changes, It applicable;
N/A
d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably
reflects the time required to complete the development;
N/A
BOOK OCOf'A~ B5
SlJI/M.OllllOOl'_
-6-
........ SlJIIM
Sl3I/M..O\1I1l101'_
-7-
....... Sl3ltM
\,
'.
',~.../ .'..
:,SEP 1 3 ..
e. A proposed amended development order date untO which the local
covernment .crees that the chances to the DRI shaD not be subject to down-
zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, If appUcable; and
N/A
f. Proposed amended denJopment order specifications for tbe annual report,
Indudlnl the date of submission, contents, and parties to wbom the report
Is submitted as specified In Subsection 9J-2.025(7), Florida Administrative
Code.
N/A
,. OOOPr.! m
. \
"",
SEP 1 3 1990\
T-26-E
R-40-S
\ . . .~L. .
~ GOLDEN GATE I : CANAL
PARCEL B .[ PARCEL C J-
c
~I PARCEL 0 l._
INTERSTATE 75
PARCEL A
RADIO ROAD
N
PARCEL F
aDOK (lJ() f'~~ 1il
DAVIS BLVD~_
T-26-E
R-50-S
Berkshire Lakes
PARCEL LOCATION MAP
,SEP r 3 lit
"
....,,-
.',. ..
", '._.~
'. , ----'--.- r _...~. I
.. '. - -"..- :... I L ....- ---.lI
"Ul1LT~ ", R ~~. _'~
CJc: .- ~~ ~~~~ ~i).. r- -::.:.:.-= -JJ
[3\= /1 J~ ........"'~"---'. IL~~
El.... \\ ~~...",.... "'_~
~ v \\ ...".'-" "....... ..... ~~~ '-===::-;""~ 1
~ ' -- .-- - I
. \\ - ~ -- , - ..~--
. " .... ~ ., .."...~. - ,
'" = \ --. ~ "':- -::::- ~..".. .... (,?:j \ I '- ~ ___i / I
'=1 I " .\ \\=r:.... ~-qf '.
a I ..- \\ . , ...~-.11
'3 ...'''', \\ I : I -:::;1.: J
~!0 \v L_~~/~... /"I)[;::-j .f. ....,:::.,\\:;:,...".. .
.1 -----.::; 0 / - ~/! !!l~"=:::::~:JJ
I · ~~/ _...... :~... l ) '--
· --- .... c._.. _ 'l c. -^- ......"
... , .- D; .--::::. ('," ".., ....
. ~=~;.u_'_
I~.~ ~ \\.
1~~I(, ."". III
!:~:~;J~I.!, /;(]) ".". I P
~. ..'.' '- I' ~I'
". . :.;." , 4' ...... . ...........1 /~ I
'. "''(' // ~ ~
)".'-"';/ .... /~.
_. ~ V ..../ .
'~~jr.( 1;, !ij'
:'-:'.: 'I'>.:::::.~./~ ~ i
H.-" '\: \~.
",! I ...... ,..., \\ ...... "
-', 1 II
,~:"\ '. .~, ........... II ) 'I
~""'l_ "., ~ // ".n, I
~-~~~'" \- /1 r... 11
::"\~~~~1f .....~lJl
"''''..-.:r-:1b c=- \I
-'... r-~'""\ (-:;<, '/7.::'; ~"_"''''II
' ----:'\ ......"-J:.J \.::____ \ ,....
\'::: 0) .......:1 l.............
.:::~.~.
~I{ OOO,..~! as. _ .. _ '"
.....:0,.. ;,., "
Berkshire
11 akes
~ LAN
MASTER DEVELOPMENT P
E.hlbil H
II
I
--------
-I
"':1'
;-
./
lOOK
000 mt 89
SEP 1 3 ..
PROJECT SUMMARY
R-'
2'.' Ac
R-2
Co,
77,4 Ac
'6 Ac
Lak... Conservalion
Wal.r Mgl 73.6 Ac
R/W
2'.8 Ac
Goll Cour..
& Bufl.,.
115.' Ac
Tolal A,..
333 Ac,es
.R .cr..... .,. ""0114'''.'.
e"41 ......c:1 t. c,,~.
t: '"II Ace...
! Ill..... Tv,.. Ace... 01"1',
<). Iu" A.... 1ft
<.> """I h,.. 0"., Oul
l'
. '..200'
It:.
i
,1..' '" If ...._ .._..... .. ........ ... ..... ....... ....
-.................... ................
PARCEL 'F' .
U.S. HOME
BERKSHIRE LAKES
MASTER PLAN
CORPORATION
P.U.D. EXHIBIT H-1
pr....... by: ............. ,..rt... . I" , ".... 1iftC.
Oue....., l'.S
WO# 23'2. ,....,. uP."
t>l\nrp.1. ,.' M""
11.- 1
1
j
I
f
I
I
SEP 1 3 .
~
S-
.- U'C
~~
ut-u;:
--#: ~
:-. ~ \J)
~~,
-~
.
t
~ ~ ~ ~~~n ~ i
~ ~ , .~';a i'l!
P .. II . I ~
t t t 1
. ! ! ~
~ J! jfqj if
i Ii ~i 1',t}l J J I f
JIll u3&IJ
! j
iiI! f
Hi JIi
III t
. 111111
II J I'
. HI jJ
~. Jl1111
I ~ fIll
· i ·
.. t
zEB
I
.
,.i .3
r .. C j!
c~~
i i: d
~ ~ 2 ~~
... ... I:l ~.
I'
jl
"-'
o
.
5;
1]
f
~
PARer.:" AI M^,' 11-;1
( C , lIP
. ':1: i .
J ll: I "Ill
· J.,
i II t
=! JIlli
~ Jill
I iii
i Iq
I I
.
:g
. ,
I]
u
~I
I
I
!
I
L "
I .
I
~
~~
:
itl: I H III II iE
.~ 'I r (I I~
"Ii I I"
ih I l Iii
f: I: ; :
.r ~ ~
il
&)1
HII:
~L__
ljlf
i J lli
'1,,0
I'
I ,
I i
Ji\
f:
), :.
-1--' ,
I ,
II '
I, .
, ,
, I
I \
ill
I _~
..nt. S...b.... Blvd.
SEP 1 3 _
0 iJ iJ III D 0 ~ D r-
, .. .. ll! i . . !:l
a !. !. .. :J
. D .. 'D . D Q.
. C . i . . , .
D , ~ .
1 , !. " i: c:
! .. . .
. D ~ i . .
. , ,
. . . .. II
;; . . . II !:
.. . c , . UI
, 3
c II C
. .. . 3
. ~
0 .. 3
. ,.
. !:l
" ,
.
. 0(
..
A .. A " III ..
.. .. ... " " A
c D ill ia 0 0 ill ill
.. D
. . . . . . .
0 0 0 0 0 a
-f I
&=
j! , ,
,
f I , ~
L
--
'_ _b-~~.j
~I ~ ~~\..
=- ,~ '1
:D' f '
j . j 1
~ 'VI '-.--#, "
, .":, ,if :D 1
a ~, :
:.~~
:D
11 - ~
.
i
f
I
&
aODlt 000 P.~t 91
! 'II~! i{ ,I" 'lllt',1 II I~
I .;; ",' ":i
"" I, 11:1 I I' 'I'
. I ': I I'
~l IiI: il.1 , I!I!II
_I :,.I~I:. z
BERKSHIRE LAKES
PARCEL E . PUD/DRI MASTER PLAN
MAP H-3
prepared for: William T. HIQQs
~
.
,
.
..
.
..
.
...
Cl
r
I
\
,
\1 :
\ .
\
,
j
I
I ! II n'"1 " I
IUI f H 1 i:: : '''''S;'::!::;: ./
/lIt f . II J ! 1. r I I l~i;1!3!EI!;.,:,~
I lilt} I f If.. ;' l~!~:!:1!~ ; .ff.}
.. ."
".'
.
SEP f 3 ..
TABLE I
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION CHART
BERKSIDRE LAKES
ATTACHMENT TO FORM NO. RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-I
Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI Sub-
Section 380.06) (19) Florida Statutes, Question 6.
LAND USE
PROPOSED
PLAN
CURRENT PLAN
(per DeYelopment Order, CHANGE
as amended) + 1-
OFFICE
N/A
N/A
INDUSTRIAL
N/A
N/A
are feet
"
tOOK 000 fAt;! 92 .
JO_II_.-
...... JOIIM
I
. j
I
:'
it'
"
I
f
.'
!
\
,
\
\
,\
"\
SEP 131M
TABLE I ... Page 2
CURRENT PLAN
PROPOSED (PtJ' Denlopment OrdtJ', CHANGE
LAND USE PLAN u amended) +/-
RESIDENTIAL
Total Units No Chan~e 4200 Units -
Dwellln~ Unit TYPe 1,256 units 950 units + 306 units
inftlc Family
Mu II-FamilY' 2 944 units 3 250 units -306 units
Residential Acreage 553 acres 567 acres - 14 acres
Sile Location Changes See Exhibit See Exhibit
ExtemaJ Vehicle Trips Se6 Traffic. See Traffic Infonnallon
Infonnation
D.O. Condillons No Chanlre No Change
ADA Rl!nrcsentalions No Chan~e No Change
RETAIL
Acrea2c No Chan2c 42.S
Floor Soacc {Gross S.F.\ No Chan2c 375 000
Parkin! Snaces No Chan2c Not Detennlned
Emnlovees {estimated' No Chan~c Not Detennined
Sile Locatlonal Chan~cs No Chanl!c No Chanpe
External Vehicle Trlns No Chanl!e No Chanpe
D.O. Conditions - -
ADA RmresentatJons - -
I. WOn? 93
",_u-...,
...... ",IJN
'j
'l
1
j
~j
'"o:i
:J
!
,
1
.
~
j
j
j
1
1
l
l
1
J
:'1
j
,
1
~
1
:1
y
\,
TABLE 1 ... Page 3
LAND USE
HOTELIMOTEL
External Vehicle Trl s
D.O. Conditions
ADA R resentatlons
RECREATION/OPEN SPACE
Total Acrea e
Incudea the CollowlnJ.tecreatkm '
and open apace facUltlea:
- LUes
Parb/Open Space/Green
Belts
Golf Course
Slt& Location Chan es
e of
D.O. Conditions
ADA R resentatlons
""_11_.-
PROPOSID
PLAN
N/A
No Chan e
See uses above
No Om e
No Chan e
(
SEP 1 3 ..
CURRENT PLAN
(per Development Order, CHANGE
u amended) + /-
N/A
439.2
179.8
176.9
82.5
See uses above
No Chan
No Chan e
lOOK {J()O~ 91.
....... ",tlN