CAC Agenda 06/10/2010 R
Collier County: June 10,2010
June 10, 2010
MEETING AGENDA & NOTICE
MEETING AGENDA &. NOTICE
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAe)
THURSDAY, JUNE 10, 2010 - 1:00 P.M.
TURNER BUILDING (Administrative Building F, 3rd Floor Collier County Government Center,
3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples)
SlIJ:I$hine ..Law -.2.n..A9t:JJ<1i.. Q..uestion$
PUBLlC_N.ontE
t. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance
III. Roll Call
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
V. Public Comments
VI. Approval of CAe Minutes
1. Ap.rH 8, 21110
vn. Staff Reports
1. E_~~JJded.Rey:e.n.u..e...Repgrt~_~ McA.J..Rln
2. ProiettCo-.StBep.ort. - GBry-M,AJpln
3. t:_merge.ngb"c;h_~enQJ.!.rJl:hrneo~_~-RIlf_QI(;h
4. O!!J;J>ill- JJPdl!te
5. Qytf~JI PiPM__c_URditte
VIII. New Business
1. E~J;:tiQn Qf_Chair_~_nc:l V-.lce ChjlJr
2. S\lmmer.Sd1ed.l.de
3. M.iI.J!;oSQ!.I.thJlen2UJilbme.ntl~lim
4. YearJ..yPhY.~lljJ.ildLM2nitOI.ID-9-~jtc;;t
5. W.imJi.", Pi_ssf'f_l.-1__Dred9~En9in.uring
6. Ch_i.nge Otderl'Hl.. J. PB.SJY_foxClilmPjllliB.~Y
7. Ch.o"nge QrM:rNo,l CPR.lQ.WiggLIl~III;;"gil1e.erlng
IX. Old Business
1. final \'.er.l.i2r1Pr.QRQ.utN.P.P.S.O_P.eerReyi,ew
2. Clam_.B.~Y InfQtmni2ni!I,"'~Permit_
X. Announcements
XI. Committee Member Discussion
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
TBD - Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
XIII. Adjournment
All Interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any,
in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable.
For more informatIOn, please contact Gail D. Hambright at (239) 252-2966.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this
proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the
http://www.colliergov.net/i ndex. aspx?page=2 9 5 3
Page I of2
6/25/20 I 0
Collier County: June 10, 2010
Page 2 01'2
Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Fl 34112,
(239) 252-8380.
Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time.
Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board
of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board
Minutes and Records Department.
http://www.colliergov.netlindex.aspx?page=295 3
6/25/20 I 0
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Anthony P. Pires, Jr., Esq., Chairman
Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee
Colleen M. Greene, Assistant County Attorne~0
March 18,2010
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Sunshine Law and Agenda question
The issue presented is whether the Sunshine Law requires that an agenda be made available prior
to board meetings. In summary, the answer is no.
The Sunshine Law Manual (2009 Ed. Vol. 3 I) provides the following:
The Attorney General's Office recommends publication of an agenda, if available, in the notice
of the meeting; if an agenda is not available, subject matter summations might be used.
However, the courts have held that the Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency provide
notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda. Such a specific requirement has been
rejected because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the general
public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body. See Hough v. Stembridge,
278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st
DCA 1985) (posted agenda unnecessary; public body not required to postpone meeting due to
inaccurate press report which was not part of the public body's official notice efforts). Thus, the
Sunshine Law has been interpreted to require notice of meetings, not of the individual items
which may be considered at that meeting. However, other statutes, codes or ordinances may
impose such a requirement and agencies subject to those provisions must follow them.
Accordingly, the Sunshine Law does not require boards to consider only those matters on a
published agenda. "[W]hether to impose a requirement that restricts every relevant commission
or board from considering matters not on an agenda is a policy decision to be made by the
legislature." Law and Information Services, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So. 2d 1014,1016
(Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Today's Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee was properly noticed in
compliance with the Sunshine Law on or about February I, 2010. Further, the agenda for
today's meeting was also publically noticed on the County's website on Monday, March 15,
2010. The related back-up materials for the agenda were supplemented and available on the
County's website on Wednesday, March 17,2010. In addition, a number of these materials also
appeared on the agenda for the Coastal Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday, March 11,
2010.
In my opinion, there is no violation of the Sunshine Law and no legal issue regarding the date the
agenda was published.
cc: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management
Collier County Government
Communication &
Customer Relations Department
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Contact: (239) 252-8848
www.collicr!!ov.nct
www.twittcr.com/Collier!.1 0
www.facebllok.com/CollierGllv
www.vontnbe.com/CollierGov
May 13,2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE OF !'UBLIC MEETING
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
THURSDA Y, JUNE 10,2010
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Government Coastal Advisory Committee will hold a public
meeting on Thursday, June 10 at 1 p.m. at the Board of County Commissioners chambers, located on
the third floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 E.
Tamiami Trail, Naples.
* The following websites will provide information on this subcommittee:
htto:!!www.collierllov.lletllndex.llsox?oulle=18 httll:/ /www.collier!!ov.net/lndex.aSIlX'!llal!e=1263
Two or more members of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board may be present and may
participate at the meeting. The subject matter of this meeting may be a future item for discussion
and action at a Pelican Bay Services Division Board meeting.
Two or more members of the Tourist Development Council may be present and may participate at
the meeting. The subject matter of this meeting may be a future item for discussion and action at a
Tourist Development Council meeting.
In regard to the public meeting:
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing, to the board/committee prior to the meeting if applicable. All registered public speakers will be
limited to three minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the chairman.
Collier County Ordinance No. 2004-05 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners, an advisory board
or quasi-judicial board), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
Facilities Management Department, located at 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380, at
least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the
Board of County Commissioners Office.
For more information, call Gail Hambright (239) 252-2966.
-End-
CAC June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
1 of 10
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, April 8,2010
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory
Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business
herein, met on this date at I :00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at
Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government
Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, 1lI
VICE CHAIRMAN: Anthony Pires
Murray Hendel
Jim Burke
Victor Rios
Robert Raymond
Joseph A. Moreland
John Areeri (Excused)
(Vacancy)
ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney
Gail Hambright, Accountant
Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples
CAe June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAe Minutes
2 of 10
I. Call to Order
Chairman Sorey called the meeting to order at I :02 PM
II. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge or Allegiance was recited.
III. Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried
unanimously 7-0.
V. Public Comments
None.
VI. Approval ofCAC Minutes
1. March 11,2010
Mr. Rios moved to approve the minutes subject to the fOllowing addition:
Page 2, item III -- Roll Call- Before motion, addition or the statement Chairman
Sorey recommended the Agenda be modified for the Committee to hear item
V/J./- "Appointment of Marco Representative to CAC before approval of the
Agenda. "
Second by Mr. Moreland. Carried unanimously 7-0.
VII. Staff Reports
1. Expanded Revenue Report - Gary McAlpin
The Committee reviewed the "Tourist Tax Revenue Report - FY 2009- 20fO ,.
updated through March 20 I o.
2. Project Cost Report - Gary McAlpin
The Committee reviewed the "FY 2009/20fO TDC Cate?,ory "A,' Beach
Maintenance Projects" updated through April 1,20 I O.
The Committee requested:
. Starr provide an update on the Clam Bay Aids to Navigation "Letter or
Consent" at the next meeting.
. A monthly update on the dollar amount of contracts awarded to
consultants listed in the Project Cost Report.
VIll. New Business
1. Emergency Truck Haul Project - Doctors Pass and Park Shore
a. Engineering StatusfPermit
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to
approve an after the fact authorization ofen?,ineeringfundl' requiredjor the
emer?,ency truck haul project fiJr Doc/ors Pass and Park Shore with CP&E
CAC June 10, 2010
Vt-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
3 of 10
jor time and material not to exceed $41.075 and any necessary Budget
Amendments'. dated April 8, 20]0.
lie noted:
. The project will be funded through the 195 Fund, not directly Irom
emergency funds.
. The project will address eroded beach hot spots south of Doctors Pass.
. The length of construction schedule cited in Phase I and III of the
document (30 or 60 days) will be revised to provide consistency.
. The Competitive Consultants Negotiation Act (CCNA), does not apply
as the total amount of the contract is less $50,000.
Mr. Hendel moved to approve the recommendation provided in the
Executive Summary (approve an after the fact authorization of engineering
funds required for the emergency truck haul project for Doctors Pass and
Park Shore with CP&EjiJr time and material not to exceed $41,075 and any
necessary Budget Amendments''). Second by Mr. Rios. Carried
unanimously 7-0.
b. Conceptual Constrnction Plan
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to
approve contract expenditure for up to $375,000 as per the attached
conceptual plan jor emergency truck haul re-nourishment at Doctors Pass
and Park Shore beaches and any necessary Budget Amendments" dated April
8,2010.
lie noted the current estimate to obtain the permits for the work is 5- 6
months, which is too long given the urgency of the situation. There are 3
options to expedite the permit process:
1. Obtain an emergency dredge declaration.
2. Obtain a CCCL (Coastal Construction Control Line) permit from
FDEP for the project.
3. Amend the existing permit -- would require amending the sand
source, requesting truck hauling for the sand, and for the work to
be completed in the summer (during turtle nesting season).
Option 3 is the most feasible and Staff proposes to meet with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection before the application is submitted in
attempt to answer all questions, reducing multiple Requests for Additional
Information. This could reduce the permit process to approximately 60 - 90
days. The intent is to obtain bids for the work during the permit process, and
begin the work immediatcly after the permit is issued. Turtle nesting should
not be an issue, as there is no beach available for nesting.
Mr. McAlpin also provided an overview of the construction process which
will include hauling sand by truck and delivering it to the beach via
conveyors. The solution is expected to last approximately 3 years at which
CAC June 10, 2010
VI-l Approval of CAC Minutes
4 of 10
time there will be a major beach re-nourishment. Then a longer-term solution
to the problem will be implemented.
Speakers
Doug Finlay noted a large volume of the sand placed during the last
Countywide beach re-nourishment appears to have dissipated. He expressed
concern over 10 years Beach Re-nourishment Cycle. He recommended
consideration be given to reducing it to approximately 7 years.
Margaret Grant, Indies West noted since the March 8, 2010 meeting the
beach in the area has eroded approximately 2 more feet. She requested
immediate assistance to address the problem. She provided photographs
which identified the extent of the erosion.
Linda Penniman, Moorings property owner, expressed concern on the
length of the permit process noting addressing the erosion is an emergency.
Mike Field, Gulfview Beaeh Club noted the area should be deemed an
"emergency situation."
Gary MeAlpin noted another option is for Collier County and the City of
Naples to declare an emergency and sand be placed to the ""mean high water"
line on the landward side. He expressed concern the sand will migrate to the
near shore creating a permit violation. The option could be implemented
quickly, but should remain a ""safety valve."
Mr. Hendel expressed concern on the urgency of the situation and based on
the time estimates for receiving the permits, recommended the Board of
County Commissioners and Naples City Council deem the problem an
.'emergency. "
Gary McAlpin recommended delaying this action temporarily until Staff
meets with FDEP Staff to discuss the aspects involved in amending the
permit.
Mr. Pires recommended the BCC declare the situation an ""emergency" at
their next meeting, and adopt a resolution requesting assistance in addressing
the issue from the Governor and Cabinet.
In addition, on page 4 of8 ofthe proposal, under ""Permit Application and
Processing" - Staff should clarify the extent of the berm construction and the
work is intended to be completed during turtle nesting season.
Mr. Rios moved to approve the recommendation as outlined in the Executive
Summary (approve contract expenditure for up to$375,000 as per the
aI/ached conceptual plan for emergency truck haul re-nourishment at
Doctors Pass and Park Shore beaches and any necessary Budget
Amendments). To recommend Staffal/emptto have an item placed on the
CAe June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
5 of 10
next available Board of County Commissioner's and Naples City Council
Agenda to pass a resolution declaring the situation an "emergency." The
BCC also make a determination the emergency ~.ituation may require a
deviation from normal Purchasing Policies. Second by Mr. Raymond.
Carried unanimously 7-0.
2. Fiscal Year 10/11 Budget Discussion
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary Recommendation to Approve
the FYlO/II-I95 Fund Budget and Analysis; Fund 195 -10 Year Fund
Projections: FY 09110 Grant Applications and the FYI 0/1 1 Grant Applications"
dated April 8,2010.
a. Fiscal Year 10/11 Budget Analysis
Gary McAlpin presented the document "FYI 0/1 1-195 Fund Budget and
Analysis" dated April 8, 20 I 0 for review.
It was recommended item 8 Projected Expenses, - '.Category Pier Reserves"
be amended to reflect the item isjiJr the .'Naples Pier."
b. Fund 195 10 Year Plan
Gary McAlpin presented the document 'TDC Category "A:" 195 Fund
Projections" dated April 8,2010 for review. The document provides
projected expenses for the Department through 2018 including a FY2012113
major beach re-nourishment project. He noted without funding from FEMA
(or other Federal or State Funds, etc.), the Department will not have enough
revenue to implement its required programs.
Break: 3:00pm
Reconvened: 3:07pm
Mr. Pires did not return
c. Fiscal Year 09/10 Grant Applications with Grant Guidelines
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary Share TDC Category "A "
Grant Applications not budgeted in FY 09/10 dated April 8, 2010.
Mr. Burke moved recommend (the Board of County Commissioners)
approve the FY 09/l0 Grant Applications. Second by Mr. Moreland.
Carried unanimously 6-0.
Mr. Pires returned at 3: I2pm
d. Fiscal Year 10/11 Grant Applications with Grant Guidelines
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Share TDC Category "A"
Grant Applications from the City of Naples, The City of Marco Island and
Collier Countyfor FY-IO/ll" dated April 8, 2010.
CAC June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
6 of 10
Mr. Rios moved to recommend (the Board of County Commissioners)
approval of the Grant Applications. Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried
unanimously 7-0.
3. Wiggins Pass Inlet Permit Application Update
a. RAI Comments - FDEP
Gary McAlpin provided a Memorandum from JetT Raley, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) - Bureau of Natural and
Cultural Resources to Dr. Merrie Beth Neely - FDEP - Bureau of Beaches
and Coastal Systems. Subject "Collier County's JCP application, File No.
012538 Wiggins Pass" dated March 24, 2010 for review.
The Memorandum will be addressed in detail at the April 19, 2010 Wiggins
Pass Subcommittee meeting.
b. Inlet Management Plan and Environmental Impact Study
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary Recommendation approval
Work Order under Contract 06-3902 for additional tasks for the Wiggins Pass
projectfor time and material not to exceed $125, 178 dated April 8, 2010.
Mr. Moreland moved to recommend the Board of County Commi~.sioners
approve Work Order under Contract IJ6-3902 for additional tasks for the
Wiggins Pass project.for time and material not to exceed $125,178. Second
by Mr. Burke. Motion carried 6 'yes" - 1 "no." Mr. Pires voted "no."
4. Uncompleted Work Awarded on BVO Contracts
a. North Country Passes - CP&E
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to
approve Work Order under Contract 09-5262 with Coastal Planning &
Engineeringfor North County Passes Survey and Engineering Report.for time
and material not to exceed $79,935. This is the unfinished work under the
B VO contract for Physical Monitoring and a contracting method change to
satisft the Clerk '.I concerns jor the County's contracting method dated April
8,2010. He noted the policy has been prepared at the direction of the
Purchasing Department.
It was recommended the line 5 - 6 of the title of the Executive Summary be
amended from"... contracting method change to satisft the Clerk's concerns
jor the County's... "to"... contracting method change in an attempt to satisft
the Clerk's concerns for the County's...
Speaker
Marcia Cravens, Mangrove Action Group requested clarification if the
work has been noticed for competitive bidding? In the past, qualifying firms
have been rotated through the CCNA process. Public records indicate the
original sand bypassing project approved in AprillMay 2008 for Clam Bay
was developed by the "Estuary Improvement Discussion Group." The Group
CAC June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
7 of 10
did not operate under the Sunshine Law and, in her opinion, had no authority
to make the recommendation for the work. The project has been subject to
numerous change orders and questions how any work orders may proceed
given the fact they were derived from this original recommendation.
Chairman Sorey stated these concerns should be directed to the Board of
County Commissioners.
Mr, Burke moved recommend the Board of County Commissioners to
approve Work Order under Contract 09-5262 with Coastal Planning &
Engineering for North County Passes Survey and Engineering Report for
time and material not to exceed $79,935, This is the unfinished work under
the BVO contractfor Physical Monitoring and a contracting method
change in an attemot to satisfy the Clerk's concerns for the County's
contracting method, Second by Mr, Moreland, Motion carried 6 "yes" - I
"no." Mr. Pires voted "no. "
5. Dune Restoration Grant Program Policy Proposal
Gary McAlpin presented the document "The Collier County {June Restoration
Program" dated April 8,20 I O.
It was recommended Page 3, Section "Dune Restoration Grants Program" - line
3 be amended from".. .15,000 will be allocated for private dune restoration" to
".. .15,000 will be allocated for private dune restoration on private property for
primarily public purpose and benefit" or similar language.
Gary McAlpin noted he would work with the Assistant County Attorney to
clarify the language.
Mr. Hendel moved to recommend approval of the Dune Restoration Program.
Second by Mr. Raymond. Carried unanimously 7-0.
a. Grant Application from Park Shore
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to
approve the installation and planting of native vegetation in the Common
Areas within Collier County by Earth Balance ji,r time and material not to
exceed $R,060" dated April 8, 2010.
Mr. Rios moved to recommend approval for the installation and planting of
native vegetation in the Common Areas within Collier County by Earth
BalancejiJr time and material not to exceed $8,060. Second by Mr. Hendel.
Carried unanimously 7-0.
IX. Old Business
I. Clam Bay Subcommittee - Update
Gary McAlpin
GAG June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
8 of 10
a. Anthony Pires e-mails dated 3/27/10 and 3/19/10 to Steve Feldhaus
Regarding Workshop
b. Additional e-mails dated 4/7/10
Mr. Pires noted he had met with Steve Feldhaus to discuss the concept of a
public workshop and understands his position for preferring a "private
meeting." The Foundation will meet with Gary McAlpin and Leo Ochs
(County Manager) to address the issues involved in Clam Bay (Clam Pass
Park Expansion. bathrooms at Vanderbilt Beach. Clam Bay, etc.)
Gary McAlpin requested direction on the status of holding a public meeting
to discuss any issues associated with Clam Bay.
Mr. Pires noted following the private meeting, a public meeting with the
Pelican Bay Services Division will be considered.
Mr. Pires noted there was a Subcommittee meeting where the improvements
to Clam Pass Park were discussed.
Gary McAlpin noted the FDEP has issued a second RAI for the Clam Pass
maintenance dredging JCP (Joint Coastal Permit) application.
c. Final Version Proposal to PDSD Peer Review
Gary McAlpin presented the document "Clam Bay Estuary Peer Review
Scope of Work " last revised March 19.2010 - Rev.1
The item was discussed at the previous Clam Bay Subcommittee meeting and
modified as requested. The intent is to identify Peer Reviewers based on a list
of qualified individuals/organizations provided by both the County and by
Pelican Bay Services Division. Once a list has been formulated by the parties,
a reviewer would be selected by joint agreement. The document was
submitted to the PBSD on April 7, 20 I 0 and was rejected by a vote of 11-0.
Speakers
Marcia Cravens, Mangrove Action Group submitted an email from David
Tomasko (PBS&J) to Gary McAlpin dated November 16,2009, which
provided a list of qualified individuals to review his work. She expressed
concern the entities would approve his work and the effort will not be
considered an "independent review." Dr. Harold Wanless completed a Peer
Review which is critical of the original study and no County Committee has
reviewed the Report to date. The public has a right to be infonned of any
reviews of the work completed by PBS&J and requested the review be
discussed on the record by the Coastal Advisory Committee.
John Domenie, Pelican Bay Services Division stated the Pelican Bay
Services Division unanimously passed a resolution to schedule a workshop to
discuss the Peer Review Process and will provide names for consideration.
They are concerned the Peer Review document does not reflect the resolution
approved by the BCC on December 15.2009 which did not rule out "stand
alone academics." The PBSD did not have an opportunity to review the
credentials of the individuals/organizations proposed in the "Scope of Work"
and expressed concern over a possible ethics violations with Mr. Tomasko
CAC June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
9 of 10
recommending the Peer Reviewers. The reviewers identified work in
waterways incomparable to the Clam Bay Estuary System. He requested Gary
McAlpin meet with the PBSD and prepare a scope of work consistent with
BCC direction.
Mary Johnson, Mangrove Action Gronp agreed with the Mr. Domenie's
request, which in attempt to reach a consensus, PBSD review the Scope of
Work before referral to the Clam Bay Subcommittee.
Mr. Morcland requested clarification on the status ofthe Mangrove Action
Group.
Marcia Cravens noted it is a non-profit, State of Florida organization with
approximately 60 members.
Gary McAlpin re-iterated the proposal is for the County and PBSD to submit
names of Peer Reviewers be jointly evaluated, and the reviewer be chosen by
consensus of both parties.
Keith Dallas, Chairman, PBSD addressed the Committee noting the PBSD
Board did not have sufficient time to review the document provided on the
Peer Review. This was a basis for rejection of the document at the PBSD
Board meeting.
Gary McAlpin requested Committee direction on how to proceed to resolve
the issue.
Chairman Sorey directed Staff to attempt to work uut the issue through the
pruposed meetings (the meeting with Pelicun Bay Services Division and the
meeting between Mr. Feldhaus, Mr. McAlpin and Mr. Ochs). Return the item
10 the Coastal Advisory Committee at the May meeting. Ifresulution cannot
he reached, the Board of Co unty Commissioners shuuld appoint a Peer
Reviewer.
The Committee agreed
X. Announcements
None
XI. Committee Member Discussion
Mr. Moreland noted there will be an Estuary Conservation Association meeting on
April 12, 2010 6:30pm at Sl. Johns Evangelist Church to discuss the Wiggins Pass
Proj ecl.
Mr. Pires noted Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney provided a memorandum
indicating the Sunshine Law does not require an Agenda and/or related documents for
a meeting be posted 48 hours in advance. The question arose at the previous Clam
Bay Subcommittee meeting where members ofthe public objected to the meeting
CAC June 10, 2010
VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes
10 of 10
based on the allegation the Agenda and backup material require a 48 hours advance
posting.
He continued to express his concern over the Purchasing Policy as indicated by his
negative votes under item VIII.3.b and VIJI.4.b.
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
May 13,2010 - Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
*****
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 4:20 P.M.
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
John Sorey, III, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on __
as presented or as amended
0
c; "
N 0
C- o ~.~~~.g.~.~~ ~
0.
~'" 0 ~
.", ~ ~~i~~:5! !
c . e
.:;iJ5oo ~ ~:i~~'~~~~ ~
0......:: ........................
<(==0
u> ~
. "';;;;;;;~~ii
0
.~ ;!: ~~:8 cn...._..._~
~"'-Nri... N-I
NN<Ilr--....~...
> .... ~~~;~;.^
..
,
.
<
.. ~
, ::~aE~~~~.
0 ~
0
< "'en. _ _ --Ill I'f
. !~~:;::!~~:::: "
> f:;a~i~~~- ~
~
. ~
E
E
0 ,
~ u
0
"I
0> 8-
0
0 ~
'" ,
.
~ .. Q!!g~8~~~~_~~ ~.
u. ,
0
0 ~ . . . . - -~... N N Cl
1: < riNg:::![;:~: ::'=:3~
. .
0 .. 3~a~i~~~-~~~:i .;
Q. :; ............... :;
" ,
<>: E
E
" ,
::l u
"
"
>
"
<>:
)( ! ",NUiSN"g;u.M l:l
.~ ;!;_ON<:INN'" .
.. "'.........00...111
I- ~:~f::f:e!:~-::;-
- > ....~~~_~....e
"'
.;:
::l
0 ..
I- , i ~ ~ :"~~-~-~- ~
. ,
< ~
..
> i!~~~~._a- aaaa ~
.
. ....__NN... ~
0 ..................
.
8- g
~ g~~g~~!~gg~g
,
. 0
> In. _ ...00<1>-"'-"""''':. ,III. ~
...N.......__....\lIN..........
. i~:::o_...._..._...-...-at;~i .
. ........::;;;:::t::;; ........ .;
0 "
.
>;
.
~ .
. ;::;:;:f:::::~~~~~~N2 .
.. 0
, ...;.;.,;oo~~::!~yj..;...;,..j ~
0
0
<
,
.
cc . j;
"'OCl",C co-
~ ':jj~~~:;!~;!~.i ~
~ ~ i ~ 2 e'ai~';6.E
t 't > ~ ;:.g i 0( ","';3 t
o~ ..,~ <~
o
,,<:
NO
,C-
O ~
-c<
~'"
c ~
~<i5o;:,
0....::
<{ == 0
U>N
, ".,. , CD "
"J '"~ '0
"J , i"" ,
"I '1', C..) '0 If' .. "i , U'; en
,...., " ,~ C.' .j rt; .,', r.:1 CD , ,,'~ ....j "
,1:; J ,I; f'( c.... 4. ,:1: N
'.l. '.
~d ., 1-, [. i'-' I..' ", , f:'" f.;
~) 0 0 0 ',' ~~; ;:)
H f.~ !"i H [,
:.:i
(') 1>, '" ". p, (I, i\. 0"
-'( j,] I.d ,,1 I,] ::d Ld t~;
(:1., U) UJ U} V) 'n Ul 'f)
v ('; "j
::J .. ;;1; , :'.:1
.!: '1: ,-.1' 'l. d.:
'd ,,'I ,..;j : ,
, ")
"",
in
: . .. " ~J
" ,
,
'..: :
f....'
. , , ,
., >-, >. <:n 1:"" .M 0 , ..'1', >., '-I.)
,.... :~! ;:( ,,', ;:': " , ~~ ~li ~.~ ,
.. , , >: :>: , k ,(\ ..... ('1
:) or. '0 , () .q '"
, 0 .'v')
, ,.d [".1 U
, .1 Ii
,r, , v, ., ,,1' J. ~ ,
'Ii (i) ;L , [1:, ',;; <1; Il., co " (r, ,I"~ C'i i, ,e> rY, ", u, ,
" ~..; ,1. " , (-J '" m ~, i"\, ," CO ", "J) , c" m fr', ", 'I Ii,
n.; ()~ -',: , , () "J: (.') ,',j ..t; f~ (( :l} .1: \~) j.,~ r,(: .'. d: .,
,.:' , ., ,c, ~::I h.t , i;''\ , :r: , ,
0 r:.: ,,'l , ~ 'I') ^" :> " , ., , 1-..' C! .,
I:"" :Z ~:, ,., 1;1 (;. 0 l .
.' . ,,,', (''; 'jJ en
~-; ,~J; . (.r, ,n O~ ,..., 0.', d\ ,:r; ~, rx; ~~ ,
4' ,.~' " 4' C', 4; " ~ C'i ~~ ,.
~,. '.
>; ...(', ., \G >~ ,I', C, :;!i, C,'
;"1 ,.,.. \,;, .. ,
., , ,
, ,"'J
(,., ,
" ',~' ,") .;" , G'i
;::j (1, '''I' il, ".) iJJ ,; ~u '1.' , III III
'L.J ~r 1,1 , ,,] \c; ILl q' :,J , 1,1 [.1
"., ,,, ;.., "'; :,.., , I'~I \'.' y,
" (\; ,
\1'; v
'<'1' ,
:1: ~ , ~tl ~ :t , " z
("j :' ,., ,F". ::t 'j) d, ~i:
'''J ." '-,
C) n...J ''''i ,..)
,..'1 (-J .. , ,-,
\0 '1 \i,) '" "I'
0 C U d l~ In U C) U " U U 's,
hi ~: '.:0 " w , W r"l 1.:1 (')
.., '-'J GJ (" ,~, ,r\ (1 C, () In
,''', ":) u ~<;:J
:.~ , '1')
c:\ '" " <;1' ,q , ,~
- "" '::' :> , , ~ :.(~ > ',0 :> > ,l)
w 0 0 '" u ~ Z "' ',-' 0 '::1',
0.:.;' Z [" Z ,r ,. '1' " Z Z 'D
'" ,-"" co ~
, (-,) ~,
C d,
;:;(. " , \jj /) ':'j
C) H N t ," ,. r I" 0:-, ^' F-' l''''' "
';', U ~ w U W U ,- ('," 0 U c'
.,'. 0 " G ,. 0 () ("I r ". 0 0 .,~
c, 0 ('.~ . 4'
>-ii rl "'1 "'
~'C
o
0"
NO
~
O.
~o::
.'"
c ro
~U3co
0";'"::
<l: = 0
u>co
, ,
, ,
, ,
'il , , Ul , "/j (/~ , vi if"; 01 (F.
,..:1 , "'.' ".; , ,~ w , i " , ,.T- ._l ,...,
., " .-t' I ,< .,; I " I ;1: 'T> ,,( rJ\ ,',J: ,:t <
I 1:3 [, " , r" " , "
I () ., , , '\' I
i. , t, I " I ,
"r; iI,
,., ,,: .., '..., r.r:, -",; I,..: ~i~ i.'
'f) " ( . ~
() I,') 1:-' "
::' :...., "'J ;;1: ,
.. i'",: <1: "L ,:; r:: ,
,~'i I ,..:1
:') ;J i ,
lO') ,
i .
'.; "',
;.:
, ;~ I,
.1: ,., >: ~) ,. ;:: I
I .. ,-J
I ..! ,
I ..,1
I I
I 0>1
(Xl I '. ,{: , " ,
.' rt; ,l.: (I , rY. , ,-:1; 0::' 10.: iT, " I I'r., , (1, , , I. (I) Cl.
n., I ,.1. ~~: " :<: I.:", .~ ,.1 (-l., I iI, ., I f-' n, I :r; (L, 1 l.l.
'. 01: ,~ -I: :,j r", " q' I ..1: I " " <") I ': I I' I ..:: ;( ,:( "
:1: ;'-r: 'T ,''') ,0 n; I I I., I :J: t~
>~ ",' ,:.., s: H ".j , I" ,'" I f.4 0
'o'j f,) (j , P. I ['..., C,
I ,
I. e c- , 'L' (1\ I
,,; ~ "'j :~~ (1', ,') ,.I., '1') irJ ., 1:( (Y; n'.
,-l: '1 :? 1 ~: ,f. " , , n, .t ~:: l' .
,'o- n :" ~ ,'" Ii >: >: ,
.. "
" "'-J ,
(1:: ,ii III In ,-i ,('J in I' :i .1; ,.'.,
., Iii [,J ., cd " ,,: ,,;
il,; I" c.,,; (:", ,"J ~ c)'.
,
C"
;;: ',.' ;-~~ - C)", ;'It n 'y ,") ~...
(C, ,';J :,1; ., I " ,,{ (,- >., " "
. I c.
~, 'e I (,',
I
" "j'
,,-', '.) C..! -.1' w.~ ';1
.,. :,,j ,.~! s. ,. ;,'-1 1"1
I U ;.1 i."J
:. ''I'
, .,..
... ~G \.Q r;c
;x;
<::0 " .;;.' ['0" .' [-... ~5 ,," [,.... e,
n U I~ C ~ .i ~ t./ ~, C ~ c,
~, <r :. () " G 'cr S
C::. i() "',1 ." ~
~: ", "1'
. N .. .. .. M '"
0 < .. 0 " .. '" '"
2 N ~ ~ M '" ",
;; " M' ~' ,,' 0- , M
~ ~
N 0 > '" '" M m '" '"
0; 0 . " '" ~ M .. .
~ ~ M- M' ..; M- N~ ~
~o: > '" '" '" '" "'",
~'"
c .
0- ..
~<Jl II . . ~
u...:= 0 . ~ . M
<(:::!: 0 . , , ..
u> " a ::; a g :i
'"
'"
w . . "
II 0 ~
, M M M
, . 0
g a ~ ~ M'
..
..
'"
~ . M
, ..
~I . . '"
~ a' g a' :1'
'"
'"
. ~ 0
~I w ~ . ;!
a N a "'
M
. ..
'"
~
. . 0 M
. . . ..
~I . . . ~'
R 0' N' a a ::!
a M'
~ '"
I- ::\
'" . 0 0 ~ "
0: ~I . . "'
::> a ~ ! , g N
0 0 ~
I- ~I ..;
~ '"
Z M
::> . 1; 0 ..
0 il , . "
M M.
U ~. a ~ a '"
'" . ..
w . N-
::; '"
~
0
U M
II . . , w ..
M R ~, . ~ ~
. ;;,- ~~
a ffi ~ * ~ '"
. N-
'"
'"
II 0 , , ~ M
, , ^ ~
, . ..;
a' g w' ~ o. M
iJ. iJ. N
..;
'"
II 0 ..
~ . 0 ~
, . , , M
E' n ~. " ",'
. ~ gj
.",
II 0 . ", . w M
N
. ~, 0 0 ~
.
g ~ ~ ,. ~'
::; ~
. ~
'"
~I . . , M
'"
~ . . ^ . M
0
~ a a & N ai
a M
~~
;1 . 0 . . 0 ~
~ 0 0 0
0 0 0
, ,
~ , ~ ~
0 0
2 0 ~
_. h~_ _..'_.'~_''', _ ._..,....___....,~_.._.~,..'~=~_"...,,_....._,,~___..___~."~...._,""'
. ~ ~ 0 :! ~ ~
00 !l ~ 00
" ... ... M ~
0 <to
0,," 0 g:' ..; N' .... ~ ",'
" .. '" .. N '"
N 0 , ~ ~ '" ~ ". ~
0- M' M' m M'
ci. . N ~.
~'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
." ~
c . g , 0
0- 00 g ~
~(J) II M
u..-:: ~ g a 5: '"
..
<(=0 '"
u> '" '"
'"
~
. " "
, N
II & ~ & ~ N
00
~.
M
00
~
. .
2 . 0 .
. N
a a a a M
~I ...
0;
..
'"
~
. 0 . .
. . 0
0 , M
~ & g g ~ :I
N'
M
00
~
8 , ~. . 0
" , M
. ~
a a 0 a t\ M
~I " ....
~ ;/,
:;! ~.
~
.... 0 . 0 N $
!;; " 0 0 . ..
o. N .
~. :8 ~. * 0
i2 (I . 00
~ " ~ :;; N'
'" C ~ '"
0 z 00
.... 5 N
~ '" ~
c . '! " .
z u 0 " 0 " ~
'" '" 0 , '"
0 " il ~ g ~ * ~. '"
u ::; :;; ",'
'"
'" ..
W N'
::; ~
~
0 0 . . ~ 0
u 0 . , 00
II . 0 M N
! g * a * '"
...
N
00
~.
~
0 . ~, ~. "
M , ~
0 0 M
II a ~ 0 fi
. ..
m ~ ",'
~
N
~.
~
e . ~ 0
II . . . . ;!
~ ~ * ". ~
;;: 0
00'
M
...
~
0 ~ "
0 N .
II 00
a ~. ~ oo. ~ M
~ ~ 0
..'
'"
'"
~
M , " 0 ,
. . 0
, , . 00
!I 5 8: . ~ ~ ~
N.
~
,M
I~
~
;1 . 0 . .:;
0 i 0
~ 0 0 0 "
~ ~ 0 ~
N C
" ~
0
0
o
a"
NO
ci2"
~'"
."
c ro
~U:;.o
U.....:
<(=0
U>'"
s
....
'"
0:
::>
o
....
~
z
::>
o
u
0:
w
::;
~
o
u
w
w
~
o
:0
;!
~
5
"
~
~
>
II
II
~I
~I
~I
~I
il
II
II
II
II
II
~I
~
~
"
m
~
~
,;
~
~
,
"
~,
~
.
;;;
~
;;;
2
a
-
a
0(
,
"
.
-
"
.
o
;;;
o
-
;
o
a
e
;;;
.
.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~'
~
~
.
~
;;;
o
.
,
o
.
~
o
o
~
;;;
.
.
;;;
.
.
;;;
"
.
,
o
0(
s
~
.
;;;
.
;;;
o
~
e'
o
o
o
"
~
'"
~
~
~'
~
~
a
!
o
:R
.
.
o
o
-
;;;
o
~
0(
.
,
::>.
.
::;
o
o
.
o
~
o
::;
.
o
i
~
~
~
,;
~
m ~
m ~
mq
'...
~~
~~
.
o
S.
'"
...
~
.;
~
,
:R
~
"
~
m'
~
N
,
o
~
~
~
.;
~
*
~
~
'"
,,'
~
!
'"
o ~
~ l.f!,
o ~
~
N
.
o
o
o ~
. m
~ ClQ~
~
,
M
;;;
~
, :$
. ",'
~
.
o
::>.
o
'"
" ~
~.D
~
,
.
:R
. g
~ 1'I'l~
0~
~
o
.
o
m
. ~
~
- ~'
~
-
o
...
~ ~
,.,,'
~
~
~
o '"
~ ~~
'"
.
o
o
~
"
~ ~
00
~ ....
~
-
0 ~ '" w ~ ~ ::l ~
.o ~ w
" '" ~ "
0 " ~ ~ 00,
N 0 , 1i g' g '" ' N
ci ~ . ~ ~ '" li ~
0 ~ ~ ~"
~'" ~ ~ ~ ~
0"
c .
~iJ)oo il .o
u,.-: " " m
'"
<(::0 m . " " '"
U>,... ~ '" '" '" ~' ~
~
II ~ . . w
. N
0 m , ~
~ ~ .o'
j; j; j; '" ~
~
. ~
2 ~ ~ N
~I m ~
'" j; ~'
~ ~
~
.o
~I 0 . m
. . " . ~
:;i z( a" " -:;:
~
m N , ~ , :li
~I N - N ~ .o
" m
a ~ & d O'\~
~ :;:~
~
l- N
'" " ~ 0 ~
ii: ~ ~I ~ - ~
m . 0
:::J ;' ~ ~ & ~'
0 " w
I- ~ ~
w
~ 0
z :3
:::J '" w
"' il . N .
0 W N . m m - li
u > , 0 .
w Ei ~ ~ a - .o'
"' ~ ~
w ~~
::l
~
0
u II .o
. ~ , .
~ N g;
~ . ",
si a ~ ~ N ,;
m ~
~~
II ~
N . ~ , ;; '"
. N
. . . :i
;;( si si si si
~
!I . '"
m - . . ~
. R . . 0 N
, , ,,;
j; " ;;( :;i " m
~
II .o
Si . , m '"
. N , m
. . ,,'
si ~ " j; j; N
~
II 2 ~ . ~, m ill
0 . ~
, ,;
:t :t ~ '" ~
~
~I ! , . . ~ ~
0 0 0
i 0
~ ~ ~ ~ 0
~ ~
"
o
C'"
NO
"0.
o ~
~'"
~'"
C ~
.:;U5oo
U....::
o::t::::ho
U>"'
~
0-
V>
0:
::>
o
0-
~
Z
::>
o
u
'"
w
:3
o
u
~
z
::>
o
"
'"
w
::;
~
o
"
.
.
b
-
>
.
~
>
II
~I
.
~I
~I
il
~I
il
II
II
II
II
II
;1
;/;
~
~'
..
~
,,;
~
N
.
"
&
N
g
~
*
N
,
N
."
*
"
.
"
~
~"
,
;;;
.
~'
;;;
.
.
"
*
o
.
.
a
.
!
o
.
~
.
,
"
""
;:(
~
~
~
N
~'
o
..
~'
~
,
.
g
~
a
~
~
o
N
""
*
.
0"
.
,
~
N
o
~-
;;;
.
~'
;;;
~
*
.
.
~
.
.
~"
:!.
~
*
,
g
o
o
~
N
~
~
~'
~
N
~'
~
3
<>
rl
~
o
ffi'
.
a
.
o
"
~
.
.
o
~
o
~
~.
;;;
,
N
S'
;;;
,
*
:!
8"
:J:
"
.
*
~
"
a
o
o
g
.
o
o
o
2
o
N
..
gf
~
~'
~
"
o
M
a
o
,
g
.
"
a
g
*
.
,
."
i!!,
.
~
.
,
,
.
N
o
."
i!,
"
,
E
.
o
*
~
.
N
.
.
.
~
.
o
o
~
i(:l:$
... ~,
U'I~ ~
~ ..,
vi~
~~
...
...
o
,,;
~
..;
~
~
~
N
~'
~
N
~'
'"
o
~
..
~'
~
...
..;
~
~
..
~
.;
~
~
~.
~
~
N ~
. ..
o ~'
*' r-.
~ ;:;~
'"
N
* ~~
." N
. ~
:;rtt
. ~
~
~
~
M ...
~- ~~
j~
~
~
. ~
. N
, ..'
...
. ...
~;i.
o
~
N ~
,~- ~~
.. N'
'"
...
~
" 0
'"
~. ~
. N'
~
o
..
. ~
. .,;
11~
~
~
~
~ ~
a ~~
'"
~ ~
...
~ g
o
ot
NO
C-
o.
~cr
.'"
c ~
..:;U5co
()~:
<(=0
U>m
~
....
....
V>
a:
::>
o
....
~
z
::>
o
u
'"
'"
::;
~
o
u
~
z
::>
o
u
..
w
::;
~
o
u
~
o
~
w
o
:l
"
..
~I~
o ~
~ ;l
o
:!i
~
o
z
:l
'"
o
u
..
"
:!i
~
~
0-
"
Z
~
~
.
>
~
II
11
~I
~I
~I
~I
il
II
~I ~.
~
!I
II
II
~I
m
~
...
..'
M
~
M'
~
~
.
.
!
,
.
,
g
.
E
~
*
~
a
o
~.
:;(
.
.
.
~.
:;(
.
~.
"
M
.
,
a
S
E\
M
~
.
o
a
~
N
18
.s
N
N
.;
~
~
~
*
.
~
o
a
&
~
~
.
.
,.
~.
~
.
o
5f
:;(
o
.
~'
:;(
.
.
.
~.
.
"
,
"
;;f
o
~.
~
~
*
.
~.
:I,
o
o
.
o
o
~
~'
m
...
..'
~
~
.
~
,
.
o
~
,
.
,
~.
~
o
cd
*
.
~.
"
,
~
,
~
,
~
:;(
o
~.
"
.
.
o
.
.
o
*
.
.
*
.
~
.
o
o
~
~
M
~
~'
;l;
N'
~
~
M ~
... M
M~
Lri' O\~
MM
N ~
o Ill'
~~
~~
,
o
,
~.
~
5l
'"
N
M
N'
~
.
~
*
~
M
m
~'
M
~
N
~
o
~
...
~
~
"'
~
~
N'
~
~
g
~
M
..
.,;
...
..
M'
~
~
~
"
~
, N
. ~
S' ~
,i ~,
~
,
.
.
N
~ ::
o ~'
~. ~
~. ~
~
o
~
.
~.
~
m
m
, ~
. '
",' ~
~ ~
,-j 0'
. ~
~
~.
;;f
M
~ g
~. g
~ r;o'
~
,
S
~
am
~. :1
a :1;
vtlfl'
~
.
.
~
~
. ~
. ~
~. ~
,. .;
~
M
.
,
a
m
. ~
~ ..
<DO t
;~
~
.
.
a
~
~
(,\, ~~
H
~ N'
~
.
o
o
.
o
o
o .:...;
g"
~b
e ~
0 ~ ~ I!! ~ m N '"
~ :I, ~ . ~
" " ., N N "'''!.
0 ~' ~' , C
N > N '" ~ m
0 0. . m N N N N~
W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
'"
W'l= >
5 $9 co
,VJ~ il
u......'O ~ N
<C=o 3l i( ~
~ '"
()>~ ~ ~
II '"
0 " . ~ ~
" . '"
:;( ~ ~'
~
2 ~
~I 0 a N
0 '"
~ :;( m'
~
. ~
~I " , ~ ~
~ , " m
:f. . ~'
~ ~
" , 0 ~
~I 0 0 . N 8 m
- ., "', f"o~
:;( ~ c( :;( N ~
~~
~
....
l;; '"
ii! ~I . ~ 0 ~, " c
" ~ '"
::> ~ 0 0 ~.
0 .... :;; ~ t; ~ m
Z ~
.... ~
~ ::;
....
z ..
::> " ~
0 0. II . . . 0 ~
" , , 0 . N '"
U 0 " :f. :f. m'
0: ~ :f. "
~ N
"' ~
::;
~
8 II '"
s 0 ~ , 0 c
, 0 0 m
" m ~'
j j ~ j j N
~
II N
" 0 0 0 . '"
0 , ~
0 , , .;
~ c( :;;' c c( ~
~
~I , .
" " " . , m
2\ " m
" 0
~ :;( :;( - ",'
~
II , ~
" 0 ~
. N , ;;; '"
~ ~ c( ~ "'
~
!I . ~, ~
. . - , c
" 0 , . N
. ~ ",'
~ :x ~ ~ ~ ~
;1 . 0 " . 0 ~
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N , N
. " ~
0 0 0 ~ 0
0 0 0 ...
o
a"
NO
ciar
~'"
~'I=
~BS~
U..-o
<r::::.....
u>~
~
l-
V>
"'
::>
o
I-
~
Z
::>
o
u
0:
w
::J
~
o
u
::;
"
~ il
z
o
u
.
~
o
"
~
~
>
il
I;:
.
~I
~
~I
~I
~I
~I
II
II
II
II
II
;1
:!
o
'"
..
~
~
o
.
*
N
^
o
a
~
~
~
.1
.
.
.
*
~
.
~
.
a
,
^
~
,
.
*
N
.
.
~.
~
.
.
3i
.
.
~
.
o
o
"
~
~
~
N
0'
:!
~
-
.
.
&
.
^
;:
'i
*
.
rl
a
^
,
,
9:
~
g
N
.
.
a
o
~
E:
.
.
o
*
,
R
.
~
.
o
a
,
~
:g
~
M
..
~
'"
'"
'"
~
~
o
3:
~
::i
o
.
.
E:
.
&
o
.
*
.
-
.
g
~
o
&
.
.
rl
a
,
.
"
:Ji
.
.
~
.
~
~
N
'&
.
o
i
M
M
N
'"
~
..
~
",il(
M~
.. '
,'"
"'N
~ M
'" '
~..
~
.
.
~
N
N
~
~'
'"
~
.
.
f!
'"
..
'"
",'
'"
~
.
N
,
&
~
N
~
~'
~
~
.
.
N
~
:!
~
.;
o
~
~
.
~
Ej'
M
s_ ~
. ~'
. '"
~N
~
,
.
a
o
~ ~
0'"
~. ~
....;
~
.
~
~
~ ~
6 r-.~
~g:
~
^
~
*
~
. M
. '"
. .;
9:;
~
~
.
E{
'"
. N
. ~
* ~~
~
.
.
,
5
~
N M
. N
rl '"
a~
~
.
.
~
~
. ~
. '"
~ :i
~
rl
~
~
, '"
. N
~fg
~~
.
o
o
~
o ~
~ 0
~~
"
o ~
NO
6g-
~'"
"'"
Si!!oo
-,(/):
U ~ 0
<l:=N
U>~
~
t;
i2
::>
o
I-
~
Z
::>
o
u
a:
w
::;
~
o
u
"
'"
<:
~
:>
'"
"
Z
"
o
'"
'"
~
:;;
~
~
o
"
~
~
>
II
II
~I
~I
~I
~I
il
II
II
II
II
~I
;1
o
~
00
'"
M
~
~
::\
"
"
::\
~
;
:i
~
~
.
N
o
E
.
,
~
"
.
-
,
~
~
N
o
;:(
~,
:;:
8
;;(
~
~
~
~
N'
'"
~
~
,
.
::i
.
,
o
::i
N
~
::i
.
0,
"
~
Zi
"
&
-
Ei
.
.
B:
~
~
~
~
o
~
:j,
.
,
::\
,
a
o
,
o
o
o
"
o
"
N
M
~
~
o
"
-
;;(
.
,
::i
.
o
::\
.
::\
-
N
o
~
o
~
.
~
o
o
~
o
;:
"
.
-
~
a
"
"
;;(
~
~
00
o
~
.;
'"
~
~
~ "
:g:;;
1Il~ cri
N 00
~ ~
~~
.
-
.
;;(
:I
o'
~
~
.
.
;;;
~
~
~
o'
~
~
o
.
::i
~
ill
~.
~
~
.
.
::\
~
"
~
00'
~
~
.
;:(
~
~ $
~g
~
.
N
"
S ~
:;;' ~
~~
~
*
.
.
.
rt
~
, N
~
N ~'
~~
~
a
~
~ i
",'
, N
~ ~
~
-
.
.
a
~ 8
o
~:;;
.
~
:j,
o
- ':!.
. ",'
:il"l'l
~
::\
~ :il
. ~,
'"'~
~ ~
~
.
.
.
;;(
~ ~
;~
~
.
o
i
o .:.;
o "
. '"'
~ ~
~ ~ N 0 ~ N ~
~ :!l ~ '" N ~
0 5 ~ N M ~
0 " N' .,; ",' '#' .0 ~'
" :! i ~ ~
N 0 ~ ~ M
Co ~ ~ M,
oW . 0' 0' ~' ",' ~i
~'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
w",
S~a:l 0
,(f)~ II . . . 0
u......o . . N . ~
0 " N'
<(:::::('<) ~- g m * 8
U>_ :;. j\
N'
~
N
II . , N M
. " ~
. . N . 00
* a ~ a N
"
N'
~
0
~ N N ~ M
M
~I . " ai
,- ~ g l ~
~ N
~
~
, " "
~I 0 R . m M
, N'
* a g . N
.
. 0
. M'
~
~
~ ~ ~
. . N ~
~I ~- ~. ~' of ~.
N ~
d ~
~ ;of ;of ;of ".
~
0 . ~
~. ~ N
S . . . M
~I . . ~'
. ~' ~ ~-
, . "
" ~
l;; . ;of ;of ~- ;of ~'
i< ~
::> ~
0 w ~
>- . . . " M
I- 0 ~I ~- , 0 . g ~
~ ~ " N'
N- ~' ~ .-
~ ~ a ~
z w ;of ;of ;of '"
::> >- ;;; vi
0 0 ~
u :x:
0: :!
w II . . . . "
:J N N
, "- . .
~ j' ~' 6 M'
0 . . ~
u ;of . i "
. ;;; . ,,'
~
M
II . . :\ N
. 0 0 '"
N 0 . . ~'
g g i * g 0
N
.,;
~
M
II " 0 " . "
, . m N " ~
, . N'
~ ~- .- * ~ 0
* ~ '"
N'
~
II N
~- ~- . . 0
N . "
. N " ~'
~ ~ .- "
* * ~
. N.
~
0
!I '! . . N
0 . :\ , N
. N
! a 0- a * M
3, "
.-1
~
;1 . 0 . . 0 ~
0 0 ~ 0
f! i 0
~ N
.
~ ~ 0 0
2 >-
o
0"
NO
ci:fr
~'"
."
Si:!tO
,<fl~
0.....'0
<(~'<t
u>~
s
t;;
0:
:>
o
....
~
z
:>
o
u
'"
~
:::l
~
o
u
~
'"
W
,.
~
.
~
~
~
~
>
il
I;:
.
!I
~I
~I
;1
"I
~
il
II
II
1\
II
II
~I
;I
.,
",.
~
~
o
o
:;i
"
:;;
o
~
:j,
.
::(
^
^
,
:j,
o
.
.
a
.
~
::(
.
.
o
:;;
o
:j,
^
;;(
~
:;(
^
^
~
^
o
o
~
"
'"
"
",'
"
~
~
.
.
o
::(
N
a
o
~
::(
"
g
:j,
,
.
9:
*
t!
N
5:
~
~
N
.
o
;1
^
.
.
:j,
~
.
^
~
.
o
:;(
o
o
~
~
~
.,
'"'
'"
~
~
::(
,
^
,
:;;
^
:;;
.
^
:;;
^
a
o
^
.
5
~
&
~
~
.
~
I{
^
.
N
:;;
,
^
::(
I
~
~
o
':i
~
~
'" ~
'" ~
~ ~
l.Il~ li'I'
'" ~
~ '"
~~
o
M
~
.,
'"
"
o'
'"
~
~
a
:.
"
o
"
~
.
.
.
a
~
'"
.,'
N
~
~
o
*
.,
~
.,
;i
~
.
^
s:
~ ~
r< !'Ii
~~
.
^
B:
o i:l
~ '"
If ~'
~
o
~
a
~
o ~
. "
"i ~'
~~
.
~
~
"
" '"
..0
~ ~'
~
.
.
;1
'"
. "
~ N
6 tI'I'
N '"
~~
,
~
:;;
~
. '"
~ .,
:; ::f
~~
M
N
".
"
N
~ ~
2i ~'
~
.
.
:j,
'"
~ :II
::l' ~'
^~
.
o
i
o .:.;
~ "
C';t;
~ ,.
o
0,"
NO
cig.
~'"
$0=
519'-0
,<Jl~
l)";'"o
55~
~
l-
I;;
0:
::>
o
I-
~
Z
::>
o
u
a:
w
::;
~
o
u
"
'"
"
0-
W
:0
o
:J:
w
~
;;;
o
:0
~
b
"
>
~
>
II
II
~I
~I
~I
gl
il
II
II
II
II
II
;1
~
~
~
...
~
~
0\
m
:)\
.
~
m
m
~'
m
,
,
~
~
.
~
~
,
~
~
~
~
..,
M
..;
~
~
o
,
~
o
0:
.
.
o
o
~
,
o
~'
~
"
.
:;i
3
;;:
o
.
"
iX
*
"
o
~
,
o
~
;;,
~
::i
.."
..,
~
~
~
;),
.
.
.
;),
,
~
~
;j,
"
m
;;i
m
.
.'
~
~
;
.
.
,
~
.
~
,
~
.
o
o
o
o
N
~
~
..,'
~
~
::i ::::
"'"'
vi M~
~ ~
~~
.
m
~
~
~
"'
~
m
"
~
~
~
~
~
.
~
~
~
~
~
o
,
~
~
~
~
...1
~
.
,
;;i
~ i
:;:[;i
,
o
:f.
..,
, 0
~
~- ~'
~
m
~
~
. "'
~ ,...~
N' 0
~ ~
~
,
~
;;i
g: ~
" ~
",' CI'l~
~~
m
;;i
. "'
. ~
~ ~,
~
,
o
;;i
N
. "'
m "'
~ N'
~
.
~
o
~ g:
-. ~'
~
;),
N
. ~
. ~
:J..rri
~
~
~
o
~g
~ ...
o
0<0
NO
~
O.
~'"
. 'to
5~a:>
,<n~
o "6
<(=r.o
o>~
~
!;;
a:
::>
o
I-
~
Z
::>
o
u
0:
w
::l
~
o
u
::
:ii
"
~
W
~
..,
z
in
~
b
"
~
~
>
II
il
~I
~I
~I
~I
il
II
II
II
~I
II
~I
"
"
"
0;
~
~
~
o
:;i
~
^
^
o
:Ii
~
:i
o
o
"
~
"
o
^
~
~
&
"
,
~
o
s
&
o
~
:f,
o
"
",
~
o
,
:Ii
.
o
i
~
~.
o
N
~
^
"
ti
o
"
:;;
o
o
.1:
"
~
,
^
~
o
*
^
^
o
E!
$
o
~
.
"
.
ff
o
"
o
~
o
"
~
o
^
s:
,
o
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
.;
'"
N
~
o
"
^
~:
^
,
ti
o
^
&
N
~
1
.
.
~
o
a
o
a:
^
o
.
&:
~,
o
e
:;;
"
.
~
.
o
o
~
~
N
~
.;
'"
N
~
~ ~
~ ~~
.",
"''''
"'~
N .
~~
~
~
:Ii
"
"
N
N'
~
~
"
E{
8
o
",'
~
~
,
"
v:
"
'"
~
0<
'"
~
o
"
a'
a:
~
~.
~
~
."
o
o
~'
; ~
~ gf
~
o
,
a
~
'"
e "
..
e ~
~
~
e
,
a
'"
o ~
~ '"
g:~
~
o
"
~
~
oN
~ N
",," .-l~
~~
o
a
~
o ~
g N~
"' ~
." ~
~~
~
~
&
o ~
~. ~
~~
~
,
"
~
~
~ ;
" ~
_N
~
I
I
m
o
,
~ ;;;:
, ~
.i"';
ih~
o
o
i
I
01
Ol~
N"
~b
~ ...
o
at
NO
"~
00
~'"
0",
SlSo:o
,<f)~
U..-'O
(]:;;::
~
....
....
V>
a:
'"
o
....
~
Z
'"
o
<.J
0:
w
::;
~
o
<.J
~I
~
b
"
~
S
>
II
~
II
~I
~I
il
~I
"I
~
.
II
II
II
~I
II
~I
"
.,
~
.,;
n
o
N
~
.
~
t
,
~
~
.
,
.
oo.
;;,
~
~
.
~
~
~
.
a
,
,
.
*
o
,
a
~
oo"
1i
~
o
&
.
a
~
,
o
S
.
o
~
~
~
~
~
M'
~
o
N
~
a
~
*
~
~
,
o
5
.
~
a
~
g
~
f
~
a
~
~
o
.
^
~
^
.
m
oo"
;;,
.
~
s:
o
o
.
o
o
M
'"
"
...
o
n
N'
~
,
;;,
g
"
E:
m
~
~
o
,
~
m
o
~
^
m
~
;;,
^
,
.
~
.
.
,
~
o
o
&
,
^
o
;:
.
.
8:
~
"
o
~
M
~
...
'"
~ n
~ M
~ n
af :8
~ "
.-t~ en
"'~
o
,
,
2f
o
~
~
~'
n
'"
o
*
'"
i!i
~'
~
N
'"
.
.
&:
N
~
M
N
"
n
~
o
.
..
;;,
~
M
"
~'
~
n
~
o
o
,.
~
ffi ;
~, ro..~
::::~
~~
.
o
~
~
o :g
...
.~. ~
-. n'
~
.
o
o
,
.
n
.,
, n
, .,'
~ ~
-. N
~
,
.
~
a
~
, '"
~ ~~
~- :a
-. N'
~
m
0"
1i
N
o '"
~ ~,
B' ~
.. n'
~
,
m
*
~
. ~
~. ~
*~
'"
a
~
~ ~:t
~" ~
. n
~N
~
.
Ei
~ ~
~- ~
~ n
'"
.
o
i
o ..:.i
0"
o ~
~ g
~ N ~ '" M 00
0 ~ ~ 00 00 M ... ~
... '" '" ~ M N
0; t: .i 00' '" ~. '" i
N 0 ~ M N ~ .. M
"- M N ... M N ...
0 . . M' ..' ..' N' 0 ..'
~"' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.'" > '" '" '" '" "''''
3~a:l 00
,<J)~ ffi . , , $
u.....'O . ~ ~ w R
<(=00 ~ 0 M'
. * ~ o' N
C)>~ " ~ ~ M
.
~ 0 N'
'"
'"
'" ; , 3 0 M
0 ~ W ~
0 0 ...;
!:; g ~ , ~. M
,
~ , W 00
~ ~ N'
'" '"
~ ...
<i . 8 ~
~ "- ~ , ~
~I 0 0 ~.
~ ~ oo' ,. " '"
~ :;. el ~ 00
'" N-
Z
in '"
" ~
'" 0 , :;; M
" ~I ~ ~ R ..
.. w ",'
~ * " w. oo' ...
!\ 5( 0
::; :;; ..
0 M'
:J: '"
~
~ 0 . ~
iii 0 ~ , '"
. ~ ~ ..
0 ~I . .
::; " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-
~ 0
~ :;:t v: vi 00
X " :;; ~ '"
" > '"
~ '"
~ ~ '"
'" ... 0 . , , ~ 0
ii: ~ R , 0 ..
~I , o. 0
::> ~ rl' ~ ~: ~-
0 , 00
0 ~ . . , 0 ...
~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ::i ~ '"
~ " ::; '"
...
Z o ~ 0 00
::> ... ... 0 0 , N
~I w ~ M
0 0 o. 00 . ~.
~ ~- ~ ",-
U :J: . '"
0: , 0 00
" ~ ~ ~ .;
"' '"
::; " '"
~ ..
0 it: 0 , , ~
u II ~ . 0
0 ~' , ~ M
0 ,
0 ~: ~. o' ~. '"
::> . N
0 oo. w. w ~
'" ~ :;; vi :;; ~ ...-
if '"
:l; ~
:3 ~ w , 0 ~
, R . ~ ~
. ,
::; e( ~- " ~ ~. M-
~ 00
::> o. vi vi o. ..
Z :;; :;; ..'
'"
~
0 II ..
c . , ~ 0 ~
Z 0 , 0 0 0
0 , w 0 ~.
0 ~ ~. " 00 ,. ~
u ::\ el :; :;. N
~ ~ M'
... '"
Z
~ ~
:l; ~ 0 ~ . . . 11
... . ~ ~ .
'" , 0 ....
~ ~ 11 g ~. oo. M
" ::\ ::\ ::\ ~ ..
N-
'"
N
!I . . ~ 0 M
^ . 0 ~
o. . . 0 o-
w . g o' . 0
1i'. 0 ..
~ . 3,
~ ~-
'"
~ w , . ~ ~
0 0 8 .;;
i' i' R "
~ ~ ~ " 0 ...
~ ~ 0
...
o ~
0"
NO
cig-
e<
w"'
o .
0-
~"'M
~~O
U>_
l/I
.....
to)
(I)
......
o
...
a.
(I)
to)
s::
CV
s::
(I)
.....
o .5:
.... CV
~:iE
-
cn~
o to)
o CV
N (I)
>lXl
u.. :
~
~
o
C'l
(I)
.....
CV
()
()
C
I-
<>
i::i
<D
."
.!I
~
."
C.
::l
II E
C ~
S . w
II 0 rn~
0
. ~
0 Ow g>Z
. o e
E ~~ o 0
8 .
~~ w,,"
" E Gu
0 ~ w
'" U~
" . -
W
'"
;:c M
@~ ;:r;
0 M
g>. -0 0
. 9-
w " ~ M-'- .n
<0 ",,,, ""
z g- -...
. &(3 "'f- ~
f-g w
U 0.<' Q.
. u. .
il: UJ 0 ," .
0)- ~ ~- z
-
"'''' 0
a.;: ""
~ i3
~ <> 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 ;:\ 0
0 ci 0 ci 0 ci '"
'e- o 0 <> 0 0 0 "'. "
0 00 0 0 0 0 0 ..
o.~ ci ci ci
II ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ - "
'" '" N ;:! -
." " - -
E
'i: ~ w ~ w ~ ~
UJ w ~
0 0 0 0 0 00 ...
0 0 <> 0 0 N 0
0 0 ci 0 ci 0 N M '"
.- . 0 0 0 0 0 ;r "'. '"
8 '" 0 00 0 0 0 0 -
ci ci ..
0"0 0 ~ 0 0 0 N -
. , '" ~ N ;:!
.'" " -
'"
~ " ~ " ~ w ~ ~
M '"
~ 0
. <D '" ..
e i8 N "
. , oj '"
." M
B "0 '"
U 0
" .
0.
.
UJ ~ " ~ " ~
" ~ ~
, , :e' '"
.E 0
N "'
. ~:t ~ N ..
U 00 M
0 ;\ "
l'Il .5 0
Jj~3
" ~ " ~ " ~ " ~
~
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;;; 0
. . 0 ci 0 ci 0 6 0 '"
u E 0 0 0 "
.~ 'C . 0 00 0 0 <> 0 0 ..
0 ci 0 ci 0 ci ;!:
u. 0 '" 0 0 0 "
~ . ~ 0 ~ -
0 E "0 '" '" N 0
e , " - - -
" '"
5 ii
" ~ ~ ~ ~
,. " " " ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 6 ci 0 ci 0 0
. 0 0 0 0 0 0
'0'_ 0 00 0 0 0 0 .; .;
. . 0 ci 0 ci 0 ci N
a. '" 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ - "
-"0 0 '" w. ;:!
. , " - -
.5 rtl
'"
'0
0 ~ " ~ w ~ " ~
~
0 a. . fJ~
"" 0 "" rn
. "5 ~ .
~ . " 0 wB ~
. . 0 Ii! ~ ~'" U '"
~ '* .!!:! 0. 0; w UJ ~ . 0
~ ~ ~.~ .'!l 0 rn ~~ w c
'e' .!~ ~ . . . a.~ '" .
81" ~~ ~ ,,~ . ,,"2
"- .~ IDO E'"
~ ~ 0 . . GO
. Q. . w
'" U ~ ~ . O~
I '" z
~ . '" M :g " M ~ 0 N
0 m m N N "'
.- . 0 0 0 0 0 ;; 0 0
ez 0 0 0 0 0 0
"- " 00 '" 00 '" 00 '" '"
"0 '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ '" '"
0
, '" :e' '" :e' ~ :e' ~ '"
u. - - -
o
5~
NO
. ~
o ~
~Cl:
~'"
5~
,<f)
UNM
<C::o
U>N
~
~
Ii
"
.
~
Z
o
u
.
u:
~
[
o.~
~U
E
~
w
.S
...
U '"
C"O
. ,
olD
lD
.
e
1i2
.a:s
u C
'" ~
W
.S
g .W~
. C_
~.~ ~
'"
~
C
o .
~ E
ii:-g1
~~J
, .
" .
>-
~
"ell
0. '"
-"0
. ,
.5 to
'"
..
o
~
'0
ll:
1:5
. .
'e~
0.
"0
.
,
~
.
"
~~;:-
~g:r::
00....
w 0..";" ~
~E~J,
?t:-;;:;-~
u~~g
a... "'"_0
~ ~ ci
.- .- .-
~tI)-tFJ
;:
'"
0;
a;
'"
N
~
N
....
"'
.0
M
-
~
'"
o
-i
N
~
"'
....
.0
'"
~
'"
'"
a;
'"
N
~
.
.
00>
a.. .S
.-;;
c'O
'g~
;:
N
'"
o
o
0>
B
~ g
'51~O_ 00
.E'C ~ w
~ ,.g ~~
>-5g>~
~ ~"c ....
~ 2
~
Cl:
~ ~~ c ~
w ~ f'.,. NO" <l! '" ~
'i'o'1'8L.LJwE!l:!"E
\0,...."".... 0) c>-o..<<I
'i' J, 9 <h '5'c.Q a.I
2:I~8~c~ar~~
m<nmo~.....O",<:(
M N M <n ~ '" ~ Q) Q)
uJ..ouJu:i<(~~g.c
~~.~!;t.~ ~U5~
N ~ 13 () 5
lI)....1/) U)
'"
;;:
as
N
N
~
'"
N
~
'"
'"
....
N
-
~
....
....
'"
a;
'"
~
o
'"
N
'"
~
~
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
@E<<l'Q)
o 0 OJ Q)
.c:g.~ ~
~.o.8rJ
m ~"g!E
ZI~~
'"
'"
o
o
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
~
@o;-
-'"
.'"
ON
"0
<.9_
~~
~-
00
zo
_0
00
~'"
._ N
U~
iii
....
'"
~'"
C
oJ.,
~:!-
€~
0'"
W~
-i
....
~
o
o
o
o
'"
N
~
o
o
o
o
'"
N
~
o
o
o
o
'"
N
~
~:S2
a::E
~&
tt'
o ~
0,
"
g~70
:g~6
Q) Ie E
g"~ &
>fr
Cl:
;;:
o
o
'"
'"
'"
~
~
"
o
~
o
o
o
.0
....
~
@
"
~
<.96
.0
~o
c...n
0'"
z~
-
o
.j;'
U
'"
....
as
'"
~
o
~
'"
'"
'"
N
'"
~
o
~
.0
~
'"
....
~
as
'"
~
o
o
o
.0
....
~
n
0.. ~.~
. 0 ~
.91 , ~
~c'"
J!~
....
....
o
o
'"
'"
'"
"
o
C;
.
.91
0-
m
Z
-
o
~
(j
@;:"
....'"
ON
,0
",0
9'7
N'"
0....
",-
"''''
, ~
f- .
"-....
,'"
WN
es~
o
o
o
.0
'"
;:::
'"
-
~
~
;:::
....
N
~
~
o
o
o
.0
'"
'"
'"
'"
~
~
o
o
o
.0
'"
o
~
,;
~
~
o
o
o
.0
'"
~
.
.
o 0>
0.. C
l/l"t:>>
'5,~
0>0
;:
ill
o
o
'"
N
N
'"
o
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
Ow
0<:
NO
~
O.
~o::
.'"
c ro
0-
,Vl",
:i~o
O>M
II
c
~
~
"
~
Z
~
.
u:
1l
.
e
0..-
II ~
."
E
tl
w
.5
..
o '"
c"
. 0
"IXl
IXl
~
~~
t)~
'" ~
w
.5
~ g'O
~ 'c ~
';'~ ~
OJ .
0::
"
~ .
. E
u:-g~
_Ci)~
c: E 5
~~lD
o .
" .
>-
1l
.
'0'_
. .
0.. '"
-"
. 0
.5 lD
'"
'c
o
~
e
0..
~ .
'e-:i
0..
"
c
o
~
{i~
ro c
. 0
., 0
.0
o .
- .~
~=a
.0
'" 0>
>..!:
" C
ro ro
. .
>-1J
~ 0 cu 25
o ~ g VI If"i ~ E ~~
o 0 ~ ~ ~. :I:<Ii-g1l7
~~m~A-C:oR~~~~.~t02@
"<t.......:L!)w!;;t~o..-~\COoIc: >.
II7NMN ~Ol E(<')[(;w~U Q),<}!""!P
@8;:,8 c~ ONO co 1Il 0"''' q; 5
::;:.~~:':i:~ ,();;~.!2l'7'G<(.$t:{/)
......, W'" .... ~..c r.:l\U'l (f) tl) (!) Q) 1.1I (tI >.
.s "<t c: 'V aJ _VlWV - "<t ().S ~ IJ) ltI
..c--.....-..c ~ -~- iJ::>,-=CO
~~~>:Q s:gg~
-.J UJ c: en 0 Cl'"
~ 5:<(~
~
'"
'"
05
'"
~
~
05
..
~
~
N
~
,.;
0>
~
~
N
~.
;1;
~
'"
"
..
05
0>
~
"
"
"
,.;
'"
~
~
0>
C
E w
ro c
(]) g E2'
U~oI:l
~.o..
u ~-
~o
to
'"
'"
~
"
0>
~
0>
ij
.- 0>
g:,.s
'" .
0...9
>.'c
~ 0
ro::;
~
-........ ~,-.
5 ~'5 ~
o ::2M.'!:..-
g .2 ~ 5 ~
ci:glD'";"~'7
~c:08~ci~
E~&5;;iXi;;
.!!!J;Oll'>otlc<':l
U'ltJ;lci >......:
~-"<t;;:!;fi:::
o . ~
>- ~~~lti
o..~o..'"
uCltoEh
0;
0;
"
N
~
~
'"
"'
....
'"
"
~
~
0>
N
05
~
~
"
"'
"
"'
"
N
~
w
-! ~
III -5'C
~(tI.9
~ Q)'c
c to 0
5 ::;
o
'"
'"
~
o
0>
"'
0>
....
...
..
.,;
0;
..;
~
...
..
'"
.,;
...
'"
N
~
~
'"
"'.
~
~
..
~
<1\
"'
'"
...
...
...
'"
..
"'
.,;
..
..
..;
...
"
"
..
.,;
M
M
..;
...
'"
....
'"
I-
o
I-
CAC June 10. 2010
VIl*3 Staff Reports
1 of 1
6/10/2010
Emergencv Renourishment Aooroach/Discussion
1. FWS in consultation with FWC must issue the revised Biological Opinion (BO) prior to FDEP and
the USACE issuing a revised permit. FWS has been responsive to our requests but the timing of
the process will not give us any assurance that a single renourishment project will take place on
a timely basis to protect the upland structures just south of Doctors Pass.
2. Our fallback position as identified in our previously approved Emergency Renourishment Plan
was to renourish the dune area with 2,000 to 3,000 Cy's of sand in front of Indies West and Gulf
view Condo's south of Doctors Pass only. This would protect the immediate property during
hUrricane season and be followed up by a renourishment of approximately 35,000-37,000 CV's
as soon as the BO/permits can be secured.
3. Detailed planning will begin on the 2,000-3,000 CV renourishment now.
a. Friday morning meeting with condo owners to make sure everyone is aware of sand
placement location on the dunes and the destruction of the vegetation. Walk the
Dunes.
b. Earth Tech and Steward Mining both local contractor/supplier to discuss approach,
timing, proposal, price and scope.
c. AOmm Sand
4. Reconnect with FWS on Wednesday 6/16/10 to determine if anything has changed with respect
to the permit modifications and BO issuance on a more expedited basis.
5. If not, Notify FDEP that we are proceeding with an Emergency Renourishment and we will be
seeking an "after the fact" permit for this work.
6. Develop a contract to repair the vegetation once the 35-37,000 renourishment is complete.
7. Meeting attendees:
a. McAlpin, Keehn, Kraus
b. Earth Tech - Contractor
c. Stewart Mining - Sand Supplier
d. Indies West representatives
e. Gulf View representatives
8. Decision by 6/16. Price and Schedule by 6/18. Finish by 7/157????
CAC June 10, 2010
VIl~4 Staff Reports
1 of 13
June 7, 2010
Ms. Nancy Richy
City of Marco Island
50 Bald Eagle Drive
Marco Island, Fl 34145
RE: Deepwater Horizon Response - Council Update
Dear Ms. Richy,
I regret that I am not able to attend the Marco City Council meeting this evening, as I have a prior
commitment to the Naples Chamber of Commerce
Please allow this brief written summary of actions and strategies to be shared with the Council, and let
them know that I will be happy to meet with them at any mutually convenient time in the future.
The Oil Pollution Act and the Area Contingency Plan require that the
responsible party, (BP) manage and resourcE" the recovery, dean-up,
mitigation, financial impact and long.term remediation for the life of
the spill. All efforts must be coordinated via the United States Coast
Guard Area Command and its local State and Emergency
Management partners. All efforts must he employed that allow BP to
be accountable from "cradle to grave" regarding this incident. Collier
County and its municipalities should follow this chain of command.
Collier County's Bureau of Emergency Services and Emergency Management will continue its hourly
monitOring of the Deepwater Horizon Spill event. Noted below is a brief list of actions and strategies
currently underway.
The State Division of Emergency Management remains the State's lead agency, in close coordination
with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the FlOrida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
Governor Crist is extremely active In his personal oversight and marshalling of resources to assist the
State and local governments.
-~v~.,.,.~-~::t",,=:-'-W-';"'~---~-'-i\
!8!:SI
l - nl
_.______~M"'V".
/~/ /J,
CAC June 10, 2010
VII-4 Staff Reports
2 of 13
Letter to Nancy Richy
June 7, 2010
Page 2
The State Division of Emergency Management has critical State staff embedded in all operations with
BP, the United States Coast Guard, and the States of LOUIsiana, Mississippi, and Alabama.
The Governor has implemented a State of Emergency for all coastal counties from the Panhandle to
Palm Beach, to allow for a rapid State response as needed. No "states" of emergency have been
implemented nor recommended by any of the counties south of Sarasota County at the present time.
Collier County is under the unified command of United States Coast Guard, St. Petersburg and the
associated Area Contingency Plan. I have personally met with these representatives in St. Petersburg,
along with a number of State environmental organizations, to review booming and containment
strategies.
City of Marco, City of Naples, and Collier County have compiled an extensive Geographical Information
System atlas file, to be used as a primary response coordination tool for the deployment of supplies,
materials, and staging areas.
Collier County continues to participate in daily conference calls with the Florida Division of Emergency
Management, DEP Secretary Mike Soles, as well as other cabinet and congressional members, BP and
the United States Coast Guard to continue the coordination, planning, and response efforts.
Collier County Emergency Management has prepared two incident action plans to have as supplemental
coordination planning documents to augment or escalate operations, should it be needed within Collier
County and the municipalities. Collier County has identified key personnel and agencies, which will be
summonsed to the County Emergency Operations Center for any "all-hands" briefings, training, or
operations, all of which will be managed from this central location.
Coliier County has issued a number of press releases and established important phone numbers,
resources and web links on the County home page addressed at
Collier County, in coordination with local fife districts and Sheriff Kevin Rambosk, have established
protocol to respond to any reports of "tar~ballsn or tar patties associated with potentially weathered
product, should those sightings occur. That tar-patty protocol is attached.
Collier County has identified a number of resources, including clean-up contractors and scientific
support personnel to assist the County and the County EOC, if such efforts are needed. Presently, two
clean-up contractors and one scientific support contractor are readily available to complement the
existing State contractors and BP contractors, should they be needed. Collier County's primary
contractor, Ash-Britt Environmental, is currently embedded in the Panhandle region, becoming keenly
aware of operations and providing us additional "local orientation" to response issues as needed.
Collier County continues to provide periodic email updates to local fire chiefs and established a
dedicated conference call line for time-sensitive communications, should it become needed.
Wildlife rescue and recovery efforts are well-coordinated and resourced by BP and its duly authorized
partners, including Tri-State Bird, Federal US Fish and Game, and Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
-;)cl;-S
CAC June 10, 2010
Vl1-4 Staff Reports
3 of 13
Letter to Nancy Rlchy
June 7,2010
Page 3
Florida DEP is working with Rookery Bay and other local organizations to establish pre-landfall soil,
water, and sediment sample data in conjunction with the Natural Resources Damage Assessment Act.
Other Discussions
Collier County, along with the surrounding counties, continues to work hard to address a number of
variables associated with the spill and its potential affects, should it make landfall in our region. Those
variables include
Assisting tourism and local economic interest;
Reminding all that our beaches are open and we are in no immediate threat of the spill so
come to our community and "enjoy";
The effect and variables of the "loop current" currently keeping the product at least 125
miles offshore of Collier County;
How the reSidual product will "weather", i.e., tar-balls, tar patties, light sheen or medium
viscosity, "oil mousse" and what Will be the best clean-up strategy from a range of products
and services. Those include, but are not limited to:
Use of ocean and river boom
Use of manual hand clean-up efforts
Use of snare booming techniques and near shore skimming vessels
Use of chemical or biological agents
Use of mechanical beach rakes
Use of "pillow" type absorbent materials
Trigger Points
Collier County Emergency Management and its State and Federal partners have an untold number of
resources monitoring the plume's travel, both at the response and academic level. Should Collier
County anticipate the arrival of any product, regardless of form, the current response strategy is as
follows:
+-96 hours -Before landfall evaluate product type and atmospheric trends
+_ 72 hours- Resource order for deployment supplies, materials, equipment, and personnel
+. 48 hours- Stage all equipment, personnel, and resources noted above and partial activation of
the Emergency Operations Center
+. 24 hours- Deploy necessary oft or near shore equipment and partial activation of the
Ernergency Operations Center
+ 12 hours- Indefinite clean-up efforts and around or near. around the clock operations of the
Emergency Operation Center
+_() hours- Coordination of short and long-term claims, operations and mitigation efforts for the
life of the event
3,~11 S
CAC June 10, 2010
VII~4 Staff Reports
4 of 13
Letter to Nancy Richy
June 7, 2010
Page 4
In closing, I regret that I am unable to be of service to you this evening, but I hope this general
information is helpful. If you have other questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
/., . /1
~" ~/
, .j:./ --,-'---
~a~ ;su~~;rs-----
Director
cc: Mr Leo Qchs, County Manager
Mr John Torre, Director of Communication and Customer Relations
Mr, Lee Mayfield, Region 6 Coordinator, ' Florida Division of Emergency Management
Chief Mike Murphy, Marco City Fire Department.
Attachments: Tar-Patty Protocol
Deepwater Horizon Situation Report # 39
/;./ I,;;
CAG June 10, 2010
VII-4 Staff Reports
5 of 13
Co~e.,. Coun"ty
,. ...........-
- -
Bureau of Emergency Services
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sheriff Kevin Rambosk, Collier County Sheriff's Office
FROM:
Dan E. Summers, Director
Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services
DATE:
May 21,2010
RE:
Deepwater Horizon - Suggested "Tar-Ball" reporting
The Florida Division of Emergency Management, Department of Environmental Management, and
United States Coast Guard- Unified Command St. Petersburg, have offered the following for the
management of any "tar-ball" or "tar-patty" reports.
Discussion
It is assumed that any reports by any source of a tar ball or tar patty sighting will likely come from any
source, including, but not limited to, civilian, local government, public safety, marine interest, and the
like. The intake of that report or sighting may go to a number of agencies, such as local 911 centers,
State Watch Office, DEP Oil Spill hotline, or the National Response Center. All non-local agencies with
the call centers noted above have been advised by unified command to ensure that local governments
are notified concurrently of any reports. This may also be the case for any "light sheen" or light to
moderate product. A description of these "sightings" is attached.
The intended central "clearinghouse" for those sightings is the State Watch Office in Tallahassee. I
would suggest that the Sheriff's 911 staff be made aware and periodically make contact with the State
Watch Office during each shift, to ensure communication and the routine notification of sightings that
may originate as local calls to 911, as well as calls received by the State, for possible sightings in Collier
County.
Additionally, we would respectfully request that during business hours any local sightings further
include the notification of the sighting to the Emergency Management office. Weekend sightings are
requested to page Emergency Management on-call representative, who will call back to the 911 center
for additional information and coordination as needed.
K;f I~S
. I'I,} (::ul;'_lr JI Parkw:'!' . ~'L!pl!"~ ;::1;)' c:U :~4 ~ n . ?3g.?'i2.3fi,)i) . F';;< . :t"h;:j ;:(::: . W"Wi;()ti:el'en'1'if~;
CAG June 10, 2010
VlI-4 Staff Reports
6 of 13
Memorandum to Sheriff Rambosk
May 21, 2010
Page 2
Actions that will be taken
Should a report of a tar ball or tar patty be received by the Sheriff's 911 center, the 911 center is
requested to notify the State Watch Office with as much information as possible, such as time of day, a
confirmed geographical location, latitude and longitude if available, caller information, and the name of
any local public safety agency and/or personnel who would likely be dispatched for onsite confirmation
should any follow-up information be needed.
Following the notification to the State Watch Office, the State Watch Office in coordination with USCG-
St. Petersburg will immediately dispatch representatives from either or both the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection or Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission for onsite reconnaissance. The
DEP/FWC personnel have formed Shoreline Cleanup and Assessment Technique teams (SCAT) for
immediate dispatch.
The Unified Command has directed local governments and response agencies not to pick up, remove or
disturb the tar patties or tar balls, as they are likely to capture the on-sight information for evidentiary
purposes. Should the sightings increase, Unified Command will escalate response and recovery efforts
accordingly. DEP/FWC are prepared to respond and scout both on the shore and in the water.
It should be noted that the public is extremely sensitive at this point in the response, and tar balls and
other "biological" materials that are typically common appearances on our shoreline may in fact NOT be
related to the Deepwater Horizon incident. Care should be exercised not to place any findings
immediately upon the Deepwater incident until confirmation is done by the State teams noted above.
At least for this first operational period it is my opinion that should any sightings be made along our
shores, especially after hours, such sightings do not require any local responder to man a post at that
location for any extended period of time. Responder's judgment may be exercised with respect to
securing the scene or gathering additional geographical Information to aid the State team personnel. It
should also be noted that we are in turtle nesting season, so any traffic along the beaches should be
handled with extreme care, and activity around marked nesting sites kept to an absolute minimum.
Response to these calls in all cases should be a non-emergency low priority response, unless some
immediate risk to life and limb is noted.
In the unlikely event that call levels for these sightings escalate to the extent that it becomes a
hindrance to the Sheriffs 911 Center, Emergency Management will activate its call center and advertise
a number to the public to call, rather than tax the 911 system.
/,../ I s
CAC June 10, 2010
VII-4 Staff Reports
7 of 13
Memorandum to Sheriff Rambosk
May 21, 2010
Page 3
I fully expect that this reporting effort may have a few challenges or "course corrections" in the days to
come. We will do our best to help ensure a streamlined process. Should you or your staff see or
recommend changes that are needed, please let us know and we will respond quickly to these and brief
the Unified Command accordingly.
Thank you.
Attachments: Tar Patty, Tar Ball, and Oil Sheen examples.
cc: Chief Jim Bloom, CCSO
Commander Bill Rule, CCSO
Director Stephanie Spell, CCSO
Mike Jones, CCSO-Special Services
Municipal Police and Fire Chiefs
Collier County Fire Chiefs Association
Mr. Leo Ochs, County Manager
Mr. Lee Mayfield, FDEM- Region 6 Coordinator
Mr. Richard Zyvoloski, Planning Cell- Collier County EOC
7,,-.1/..s~
v
CAC June 10, 2010
eports
CHARLIE CRIST
Governor
SECRETARY MICHAEL W. SOLE
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
DAVID HALSTEAD
State Coordinating Officer
WHAT FLORIDIANS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT REPORTING OIL
Report evidence of oil by calling the State Warning Point at 1-877-2-SAVE-FL
(1-877-272-8335), or by dialing #DEP from a cell phone.
. Impacts reported to the State Waming Point will be investigated by reconnaissance teams of
trained individuals for verification. When verified, a Shoreline Cleanup and Assessment Technique
(SCAT) team will be deployed.
. Oil on Florida.s coastline will most likely be in the form of tar balls, oil sheen, tar patches or mats.
. The following photos' are meant to help people when calling the State Warning Point.
Tar Balls: Pliable, globules of weathered oil, ranging
from mostly oil to highly emulsified with varying amount
of debris and/or sediment. Tar balls may vary in size
from millimeters to 20-30 centimeters across.
Tar Patches: An oil configuration or "structure" that
reflects a broad range of shapes and dimensions
Numerous tar balls could combine to form a patch; oil
of various colors and consistency could form a patch or
single layer 10s of cm to 10s (or even 1 ODs) of meters
in diameter. Patches of oily debris, barely able to float
with sediment/plants in them, might be called "tar
mats."
Oil Sheen: When fresh oil spreads out on the water
surface, it eventually becomes sheen, a very thin layer
of oil floating on the water surface. Sheens can vary
greatly in color In regards to the Deepwater Horizon
incident, the thinnest sheens are nearly transparent,
and the thickest are dull brown in color
.Photos proVIded by the Unified Command Joint Information Center
';),/1-3
D)r;:irSi[-;;f'r.V1fO\'~ If.r::; ...-'
L ,._,..,,'I,.hnl,l ,lr.\ ~
r:/ f~-' f ~ [!r-- (~)l" ,(1 '1r
\IU0l)IJ\' ]/t.,1 r\, ,""
";~;;y-,~ '( "V: """'l' -L<:' , i"'-': ,
1Wl~~)_ X"l 'JJ\:J:~)! '::) ,:::::-,,1 .:t.t
"
CAe June 10, 2010
VII-4 Staff Reports
9 of 13
Charlie Crist
Governor
Situation Report # 40
Monday, June 7, 2010 at 1200 hrs EDT
David Halstead
State Coordinating Officer
Weather Summary:
h,~1 'I; 'dIp ";",\ 'Nf;~;; "A"id',", jVVI iii"" w"'''','~'"'lj 18\;l;:\f,j "'IClr!i1pii';lw;'i',j
vi' "","1 i,l eUI1 ,nd td.:ba':s !C'..v,':r:.1 t(iC' w~:~5ttJ" 1'.'.';(l!VJnij'e
\ ;:,rr;, ,:l,'i" i":ici t,cwt ',,,,:1 .','VC' Si()w:'i 'I'i:)l;y)" \!>j . It)'" ,un:. G:~'! C0HSt lOd'J,!
Vi'l: ;;r'.' JlrH1(1;:; 1t, M'stc'r1y ,:HCc;li;)JI \VJay L\f'(orro ShilT"'l t'J 1'18 ml't!l
t:YHJII~,. ': ".'~; (f" 'i,.<fdr';'i ,J!):;tc ; IOri") ii.'Jrd'I-'-".:Jllw,q ,'J1 (YJ~(-Jr
,'j, ("('I,; ~'d\' liUS'; ,:nrT'f:' ';I;ri~,_);, UI ~:l; SutiK': \:,1 1('I!-Ji'Hds
"..,'11$ ,',1;1 Ie f'~;tcnl,;:; ac G55 tilt' : ue"day tll ,Y';l]'1 Hl':,
eC'U!)' v,'<,'(" C"i'ln,;<=~, ',1,11 iW,(' SUi!' ;:if;,~ ,:,a9))'I\~' th" neAt
,. ~ ~I"F" :~,'n'I"(;"1q i-l ,n" ,fer r"C')'iC:-/ u' 'I':
Curr~nt Situation:
Florida be3ches are open.
Unif'ed Arei1 Command estmlates reledse rate ot oi: from Deepwater Hor'10n (It
12000 \019000 b<lnels per day
rh,s event hCl'" b{,en deSignated a Spill of National Slgnltk€loce
Unified An'<l (>:H'1mand con,.nues wlth!l co'nplehensive 011 well 'nterverltlon ;lnd
spill 'esponse pla'l'ling follQWll1g the April 22 "inKing 01 the Transocean
Deepwa1er HOllLQll drilll11g fiR 130 rr<i1es sQl;\heast ef New Orleans
/\o;O((H.'"
More \ilan 20,000 personnel are wDrklng the on Clnd oNshore f0spOl1se
Oil-water mix recovered: approxlr'r1fltety 1548 million gallor':;
Response vessels ill use Marc Ul<l11 2700
Disper5ant (in gallol1s1 approximatety 1,082,000 deployed.l 240,000 available
There is /TO planned (lse of dispersants ill Florida waters.
Florida Soeciflc:
f~epcr"" Of ".,,1) :.; dwl:ur (,J:(~dS (11 :1(1111 ,;l1e('n l'I;'l\ie bee' ;:o:lflrmcd 'rom
c";c,n [Iiil C",'n:, :0 \,"MII\ln CCl.lrlt'i 'G,~:i I,A,~<,)r'!1Pi dre ;:v:tively Clr~;I'I,r;q tlll~
1.1'.:'2,' '''","~,
Oil Contafnment Boorn (If> leet) total 4::\-j D!~) d{,pi()yed ;'1 fIO:-i~d
fier 11..1{: ",'t" ;T,e:;J ?IQC()C
1'1 accordance w'th established plans. protectlvt: booming and boom
rnainter':3nce i~ being conducted II' the coastal (lreas 01 Bay, Escambia
Flarkli" OJo.aioosa Santa !{OS<l and WatlO'1 CO~If'lties
Accordil19 to the NOAA 011 p,ume rr>odcl the prImary od piJme 1$ iesc;' tire!'
rn If~C' from Pcns"co,a ~);) fY""",', frorn Gulf COUllty, and '2GO n'ile' from St
PeterstJlllg with "'on sheens and scattered tarballs cloi:>er NOI\I\
"';:"'.',,"tc' (,~, 'I"t!!l,;.' !;.:;rbaii', ,.)1'[1 <'ired'" nf 1:91'1 ~IH)tm T,ay "lpild t.he
U(',\CI~(-':C :'1'" 'CJh:.) i ~.\J'ild,-,:I;(; Ul"{)d:.;ll V',ed '."'5,j';j w"11 (j""ct IT,p;JCS rl\",;1
i.".ey '''-'''ni': "i'\] 'd(", n' C'1()~:I,_,',v'1.'JtC!'i"'f' I.l;;y
llt-' IS O'(l'vloing a $10U 00C; grant thrOllg:: a Memorandum cf UnderstamJm9 w,th
Volu:,'teeJ Flol ,d<J llJ'Tldlllldln <J oatatldSE' to' tne registration Of volunteers
h1lp ,/Lti'!!:!'LJ___8 QQ :.'{.QJlIi1!eel~,2r gi ~lj{::{I\LQL.,....2Ll!,(11fgrilQ!i 03iY~\'.,_~',!;!D.lR.sn9.ii,~"QQ1.
~ll!!1"31601
HP It:;sued <3 :!i25 m1!li0" blocl< grar'\ to FIOllda Ilrst prlOflty I~ boommg
HI--' ha:; Iss',jed "secund $25 '0'1111011 ;jriJ,pllo FIUld<'l for d n<lt,C)nal tourism
<,ldVer;I$,nq Cdl1'Pdlgl1 ESF 18 - BU'>ITlf'!sS InC!,,;!W) and Fconoffi'c Developm8nt
l1a~ Wunr:ilf~r:! a Ilatl-J;lillracflo and print aUveltlSlng ccHT1palqn lor Florida tOU!lsm
?5'~ ,(':<'"0'" "l;C,'/O' '.'1.""1' ,.l,,';','C';I,'G ,"1 :::Iu:u '('~, !tH,~ \I,",,;-;(,Ib uf ':)I:..,,,)'till'i~'i
"';'cq'"
3 staqmg ,,'cas ar" In pidCe to protect scnsll've shorelines in Flonda
/\t the request of GO\i8f11Dr Crist the US SecretalY of COlmflcrce expanded
the fishery fan,jre dec;arCltlon lor t!1e GUlf uf MeXICO to 'PGlude Flanna on
0..-;>/10 This lieclilratlon prOVides ,mpacted aOld eligible commerCial fisheries
1I1e opportul11!y tor federal support It does no/ Glose li;;~leries
-eP'"CTalms in FlorTcfa
-...---- .(~':':;~,;y 1:li'~-
w8geLoss
Loss of Income
.-- -----Yotitf
-- --r~ ----
f!~~~:_ __,,-,~EPro.~,' P!!~.__,.
, ,'.V
4 ; $2,1\::14,83020
J,4(~,,$2,48f),06!2_S
._"""'7::5"(;:1"" L~--- $4]?:O,8974b
Florida Information Unes
The FlOrida Oi; SpilllnforrTldtioll Line (FOSIL) is av<uable from 8am.6pm EDT
Liflilyat(88813373"69
FOI genera; health/exposures information Questions relalec to tne cil spiil,
q)ntac' tht; FIO!lda f'0'50n Information Center.3t 1-800.222-1222
Mobile Unilled Cummand ilas f:,stilbiisl1ed two publiC hat line numbers for 011
~l pll n v es tl Y ,1110n and ct ear"j P
IIrpacteo Wildlife (e6G) 557 14a~
Olt"O S'wreline (865) 448-[)816
. fhe FiOf!Wl Depilllrnent 01 State has e~tabhshed d hotllne for nrcheologlc<ll,
11islor,'_;;11 pleservCI\lorl, ill1d tribal landS lhat may be impacted by tI.e Deepwater
HOrl!(Hl'r\clde!lt -Jl:JO) 245.65JO
State A.ctions:
State Emergency Operat,ollS Center (SEOe) is at a Leyel I (Fuii) opcr3l!llg
I(H' \l10U to 15(){) FUT, With Florida Department cf E.nwonmen\al
f)rolectlon :F\.)LP\ as ~he lead agency
C';overnor's Executive Orders 1099, 10-100, ano 10-106 dectared a state 01
emergencyfuJ
EsccHTlbia, SantCI Rosa Okaloosa, Walton, Bay, ana Gulf (to-99)
Fronklin, Wakulia, Jefferson Taylor, Dlx,e, Levy, Citrus
Her,'l$ndo. Pasco, Pinell"s, Hillsborough Ma:ratee, ano Sarasota
(10-100)
Chanolle, l.ee, Cotlier, Monroe, Miarw-Dade, Broward C1nd Palm
Beoch (10'106)
Governor's Executive O'der 10-11:' autllQf;ZeS :r.e 1'1011(1<1 Fish and Wildlife
Conservation CommiSSion to deSignate Free Saitw31cr Hshlllg D<<ys to
pncouragl~ rHHH;Omme'cl8l fishing in Florida
Governor's Executive Order 10-101 establigiled the Gulf 01: Spill fc.Dr1Omlc
Recovery Task FOf~~e wllidl will faCII,tate efforts by Ilonda bUSinesses and
Industries 10 rC(:ove' from \1m '055 oj commerce and revenues due 10 the eil
Spill
Conducting dildy corlfelt;;IICe calis witrl county and emergency management
partners, the ~ederal On-Scerl(' Coordinator and ~<lrious U'lffied
Commands
--..---. ..--Locatl<)n
--". .--~bile Ullif1ed Command,
For:ward-State Emergency Rf;J~Eonse Team
Flor!da Peni~)sula Command Mian11
...--,.- -=~:::"~!..._Petersb~;--"--
Perso;:mer'-
2t-"
L. S[f~T Ii,~is!w,) n,w[; [)i?e1l depioved to (:i',jll Wi:) [;;Cdrr'lna COW'll['~ today
[SF 13 ___ 33 I';Cf'(,i] N"ltl(!!ld! G:id1(j (H"j\JCj p~rso'lnd O'llluty 3 aircraft are
providing air support on-scene in LOUisiana througrl EMAC
ESF 16 conducting daily reconnaissance flights and 25 (i person) ATVs
patlolling HOi'idaS shoreline Irom Escarnbi3 County (0 Gull COl,JT1ty tor impact
ESF 15 H,2:n reg:.stcr(~d VOll,mti'('fS, 2,676 volunteers i1a~e completed
11,564 hours 101 pre-impacl beacil clean ups In response to Deepwater
HOlizon Volunteers and Donations IS providll1g CDnsistent messaging tc
I iorld:'l vOlunteors, "All oil.contaminated materials will be handled by
trained, paid workers and not by volunteers."
[SF' ie. . ~: Y' rl'-fiITH' 'Ow (:"!,m~;(1 ",;' ~.,li.:t,V( ""I';'IDI (.:(;ljn',.cf.\ r' t~'.(-'.
F';)'lhiJ"1dl': '''''C; '<:('r ,,',';; !c.'r p.:\t:flt;,'JI \I~:a:ti, '-,!to'C
The 600111 Coordination C811 co",tlnues to ~:oordlllate addlt'QOl,,1 bDom
req<.es!s
An tnnovatlve Tec~lno'ogy Ceil is ass'>ssl'1g altePlatlve ctean-clp tecr1flologles
S:Jggested by Ule public and stakeN;lders
[SF 10 Ai! Stilte sampling dati-J be,ng coltected along !t18 Gull CQastllne IS at
'!Y:KN.llld:Jta.o[g
The Small R~slne~s AdrTllnist'3tlOn h;1s Issued (In L:conomic Inlury D:saster
1.03n Declaration tor trle State o' Florida
Disaster loan OL.ltrcacl1 C8~'te(S have been opened In the folloVV1ng
co,mtles Bay [scan,[)ia Gulf, Frankl,n, OKaloosa Sama Rosa,
Wakulladl1dWal\on
~l L"an Appllcatfons
I',;su<>-' l\JU !\,:A;C{)tCCl .14 Dccl'(',c(j Appr()I!p.Ci.2
'_c"r In'('.' rlt 'lp:YCV(:'.l S:'S: ')Or) (j(J
local States of Emenlencv
Bay: Expires on G110!10
DiXie Expires on 6110/10
Escambia Expires on 6111/10
Franklin Expires on Hi8/10
Gulf Expires on 6/10/10
Ol<aloosa, Concurrent With State
Santa Rosa Exp.l'es on 6/11/10
Sarasot<l Expire;;, on 6/7/1 0
WakuljaE.xplreson617110
N,iton f'x,nesl1l16:"1;1il
County EOC Activations
Bay. Level? (Partial)
F.scarnbla, Level 2 (Pania;)
(iu'! {evc~! L :f'..,niali
Qkalooss, Level;> (Partial)
Santa HOSil. Leve 2 (Partial)
Wakulla, Level 7 (Part;al)
(c.-1/3
CAC June 10, 2010
VIl-4 Staff Reports
10 of 13
CHARLIE CRIST
Governor
SECRETARY MICHAEL W SOLE
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
DAVIO HALSTEAO
State Coordinating Officer
MEDIA ADVISORY: MONDAY, JUNE 7,2010
CONTACT: PUBLIC INFORMATION (ESF 14) (850) 921-0217
FLORIDA DEEPWATER HORIZON RESPONSE JUNE 7, 2010
TALLAHASSEE - Under the leadership of Governor Charlie Crist, the State
Emergency Response Team and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP) are actively coordinating and responding to the Deepwater Horizon Incident
The following is a summary of state and BP response actions to date, as well as tips for
residents and visitors to take precautions both pre and post-landfall
Landfall Reports and Predictions:
. June 6, dime to Silver dollar-Sized tar balls and tar patties continue to be found in
Widely scattered areas from the Alabama state line east to Laguna Beach in Bay
County. Clean up teams have been dispatched
. According to NOAA projections. additional Impacts are expected throughout
northwest Florida within the next 72 hours due to onshore winds
. Multiple skimmers have been dispatched to collect tar mats and sheen.
. Potential impacts to Florida's shoreline will likely be highly weathered, in the form of
tar balls, 011 sheen, tar mats or mousse - a pudding-like Oil/water mixture that could
be brown, rust or orange In color
. Observations by NOAA continue to Indicate that a small portion of the 011 slick, in the
form of light sheens, has reached the Loop Current Ring, a circular current which
was formerly part of the Loop Current but has pinched off at the Florida Straits
. FlOrida continues to monitor the location of the Loop Current Ring for potential
reattachment to the Florida straits.
() There have been no reports of Deepwater Horizon 011 Spill-related 011
products reaching the shore beyond the Panhandle region There is no
indication that the rest of the state will have impacts from weathered oil
products Within the next 72 hours.
. Learn more at the NOAA webslte. If oil is sighted on Florida's coastline report it to
the State Warning Point at 1-877-2-SAVE-FL (1-877-272-8335) or by dialing #DEP
from most cell phones
On Site Actions:
. Current projections estimate Deepwater Horizon's discharge at 12,000 to 19,000
barrels per day. Learn more.
11:"<1 Is
CAC June 10, 2010
VII-4 Staff Reports
11 of 13
. BP has placed Lower Manne Riser Packa-9!" (LMRP) Cap Containment System In an
attempt to contain the leak and capture a substantial amount of the leaking 011 BP
has begun pumping gas and oil to the surface There is hope that a significant
portion of the flow will be captured, but this IS only a temporary and partial fix Learn
more.
. Meanwhile, BP IS continuing efforts to drill relief wells
. To discuss spill related damage With BP representatives, please call the BP Claims
Reporting Line at 1-800-440-0858
State Actions:
. The State Emergency Operations Center IS activated at Level 1
. June 5, DEP began operating a mobile command post at Henderson Beach State
Park In Destln for reconnaissance missions A team of staff on 25 all-terrain vehicles
will monitor the coastline from Escambla County east to Gulf County for potential
impacts. Each all-terrain vehicle Will mOllltor five miles of shoreline.
. June 4, Governor Charlie Cnst announced that his request for a Fishery Failure
Determination for Florida has been granted by the United States Department of
Commerce Impacted fisherman and affected businesses can now qualify for
economic injury loans through the US. Small Business Admlnistralion
. BP has opened claims offices in Flonda. ViSit the BP Claims Paqe to learn more.
. On June 3, Governor CIISt sent a letter to Mr Lamar McKay, President, BP Amenca
requesting BP to commit $100 million to enhance monltonng, evaluating and
responding to the constantly changing conditions related to the Deepwater Horizon
InCident
. Governor Charlie Cnst has issued three Executive Orders since April 30, 2010
declaring a state of emergency in 26 coastal counties that may see Impacts
. DEP issued an Emerqencv Final Order to accelerate preparedness and restoration
In the counties under the Governor's state-of-emergency Executive Orders.
. On May 18 2010 the Small Business Administration (SBA) opened eight offices and
a mobile unit In the Panhandle To date, these offices have Issued a total of 190
applications Find an office here
. DEP conducted water and sediment sampling to use as a baseline and is monitoring
air quality data. Statewide air quality monitoring is conducted in coordination with the
US EnVlronrnental Proteclion Agency Learn more at httpllwww.airnowqov/ or
httpllwwweNqOv/bpsPIII/
o Air quality reports for June 6 revealed that air quality was considered good for
ozone and particulate matter in the Panhandle "Good" means the air quality IS
satisfactory and all pollution poses little or no risk
Boom Placement
. Approximately 261,750 feet of boom has been placed In Flollda along the most
sensitive areas of the Panhandle and 9,200 feet is staged. Addilionally, counties in
the region are moving forward with supplemental booming plans
. Placement of boom is based on where the oil is threatening, as well as each region'S
area contingency plan.
2
/ /"f I J
CAC June 10, 2010
VII-4 Staff Reports
12 of 13
. The Unified Command Operations Group is asking boaters to avoid damaging
boom. Boom cut or broken due to boater traffic jeopardizes coastal protection.
. Stolen or misplaced boom should be reported to local authorities.
Health Effects:
. At this time, there are no indications of any health risks due to the Deepwater
HOrizon mciden! The Florida Department of Health and DEP are closely monitOring
health and enVIronmental Impacts to Florida and county health departments will
Issue an advisory if conditions become unsafe
. If residents or visitors see tar or oiled debriS on the beach, DO NOT PICK IT UP.
Report it to the Florida State Warning Point line at 1-877-272-8335. For most
people, an occasional brief contact with a small amount of oil will do no harm, yet
stili It IS not recommended Learn more
. In addition, volunteers helping with response efforts are not to engage in direct
contact with 011 and 011 contaminated products such as tar balls, tar patty, tar mats,
and 011 sheen
. Only qualified community responders should handle 011 products and 011-
contaminated materials
. For general health mformatlon questions regardmg the oll-spili and exposure to oil
spill products contact the Florida Poison Information Centers at 1-800-222-1222.
Fisheries & Seafood:
. June 5. NOAA adjusted the boundaries of the closed fishing area, adding 565
square miles at the northeast edge. On June 4. NOAA revised the fishery closure
zone to open the Florida Keys and the Dry Tortugas to commercial and recreational
fishing All commercial and recreational fishing including catch and release is
prohibited m the closed area in the federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico Closing
fishing in these areas IS a precautionary measure to ensure that seafood from the
Gulf Will remam safe for consumers ~earn_more.
. At this time, Flonda's state waters remain open to recreational fishing
. Fishermen who wish to contact BP about a claim should call 1-800-440-0858
. To report oiled wildlife, please call 1-866-557-1401 and leave a message. Messages
will be checked hourly
. For the safety of the public as well as the safety of animals. rescues should be
conducted by tramed responders Learn more
Tourism:
. Through wW~'v'ISITFLORIDAcQm vacationers are able to view live TWitter feeds
and read up-to-the-minute Information on the status of any city or region In Florida
Learn more at httpllwwwviSltfloridacom/flonda travel advisorvl
. The Florida State Parks webslte, http/lwww.floridastateparks orq. is updated daily
and will list any Impacts. Learn more by callmg 1-850-245-2157
Tips for Homeowners:
. While the state appreciates the concern expressed by Flondians and the ingenuity of
those seeking alternative measures to help protect the state's shoreline, the
3
/ ;2,,//5
CAC June 10, 2010
VIl~4 Staff Reports
13 of 13
follOWing tips are offered to ensure that these measures are helpful and not harmful
to Flonda's coasts, wildlife and water resources Tips for homeowners
Tips for Businesses and Consumers:
. The Attorney General's fraud hotline IS open to receive any reports of fraud or pnce
gouging The hotllne IS 1-866-966-7226
. The Flonda Agriculture and Consumer Services Commissioner gas price-gouging
hotline is also operational. The toll-free hotline number is 1-800-HELP-FLA (1-800-
435-7352)
. Coastal businesses should make loss of earnings claims for damages incurred as a
result of the 011 spill Businesses should file a claim with BP by calling 1-800-440-
0858 l,earn more at httpllwwwmyflondacfo,com/ or by calling 1-850-413-3089 or
toll-free at 1,877 -MY,FL-CFO (1-877 -693-5236)
Volunteer Opportunities:
. The Governor's Commission on Volunteensm and Community Service is
encouraging Floridians and visitors to become a Coast Watch volunteer Learn more
at wwwvolunteerfIQflda,disastefJ2,rg
. Report a change In Air Quality to httpllwww epaqov/bpspilll.
. For Information on scheduled beach cleanups and other volunteer opportunities, VISit
ilJ1PA",LWw.vpJunteerflongggisastgr prgl
. To request volunteer information. please call the BP hotllne at 1-866-448-5816
Learn More About Florida's Response:
. DEP launched a Twitter account, ~Jwitter.com/FLDEPalert dedicated to
providing updates on Florida's response to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
. DEP in coordmation With the state Emergency Operations Center established an
emall Sign-up and a comprehensive website at
http Ilwwwdeepwaterhorizonflorida com
. For a list of Unified Command, BP and Florida phone numbers, viSit
till2J/wwwdepstate fl usldeepwaterhorizon/default htm#flumbers
. The 011 Spill Information line is available at 1-888-337-3569 from 800 am to 600
p.m seven days a week Additional phone numbers have also been established for
persons With disabilities (800) 955-8771 (TOO) or (800) 955-8770 (voice)
###
4
) Sei IJ
CAC June 10, 2010
VII~5 Staff Reports
1of2
,1,;:'''rL''~''"
..i-.";:~'''.'.{.~";,,
!;t ~l:~ \b\
~\-"\. GULf r::o:
\(0-"';::'-"1.:...&.'
".......;:.~,,;.';
(~c/!/ 7' I~;;.)
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
TELEPHONE (239) 213-1030 . FACSIMILE (239) 213-1033
735 EIGHTH STREET SOUTH. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102-6796
Date: June, 6, 2010
To: Mr. John Iglehart, Director
FDEP, South District Office
2295 Victoria Avenue #364
Ft. Myers, FI 33901
Subject:
Permit File No. 0222355-001-JC
City of Naples Beach Stormwater Outfalls
Dear Mr. Iglehart:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with our staff and Gary McAlpin,
representing Collier County, to discuss the FDEP Bureau of Beaches and Coastal
Systems' response to the City's February 19, 2010 Report titled "City of Naples
Outfall System Coastal Impact Assessment & Management" on stonnwater beach
outfalls within the City of Naples.
The purpose of this letter is to reaffirm the City Council's commitment to
implement the City's Stormwater Master Plan, which includes management of
stormwater discharged through the beach outfall pipes, and to request removal of
the existing Beach Renourishment Permit Condition requiring removal of the
stormwater outfalls.
Both policy-makers and staff of the City of Naples are committed to improve the
quality of stormwater prior to discharge into Naples Bay and the Gulf of Mexico.
As summarized in the City's report to FDEP, substantial resources have been
committed to reach this worthy goal. Furthermore, it is recognized that water is a
limited resource and that supplemental water sources, such as stormwater, are
becoming so much more important. As technology advances and economies
improve, even more viable approaches can be considered for this difficult task.
However, this is expected to take time and even more resources.
As you are aware, any modification to a stormwater system requires regulatory
approval. For modifications to the drainage systems that include the beach outfall
pipes, the City intends to continue to work through the South Florida Water
Management District for regulatory approval and issuance of an Environmental
Resource Permit. It is therefore requested that FDEP allow the City to continue to
follow this existing regulatory process rather than supersede it by regulating
stormwater management through the County's beach nourishment permit.
, ( .
(- ///r.) ,/,//,/ n- ,/,///,//i,- .. . ';;/II/~''/ /t. (//,//.) '/0/( ,)<:/< <. /6//"-/(/ //,/ ""'// //;(/ //'/ I,{,
CAC June 10, 2010
VII~5 Staff Reports
20f2
Mr. John Iglehart
June 8, 2010
Page 2
In its report, the City has provided convincing evidence that the beach outfall
pipes do not contribute to erosion. They do not negatively affect turtle nesting,
nor do they impede lateral public access. There is no recent documented
evidence demonstrating adverse impacts from the existing beach outfall pipes
within the City of Naples. Over the past 14-years, Collier County records show no
negative trends or adverse impacts to turtle nesting from the buried outfall pipes.
Public beach access and ample public parking is provided, and there are no
documented complaints of lateral access issues.
Water quality testing as performed by Collier County has continuously shown
acceptable levels for all public recreational uses. As detailed in the City's report,
this can primarily be attributed to the upstream water quality initiatives continuing
to be implemented by the City.
The City of Naples looks forward to continuing its partnership with the FDEP as it
implements planned stormwater projects and programs. As demonstrated by the
successful Basin III and Basin V stormwater construction projects, financial
grants allocated by FDEP, along with local funds, can make a world of difference.
We look forward to your continued support in our 319 Grant Applications
(currently in for review).
In summary and based upon the above outlined commitments and the February
19, 2010 Report, the City respectfully requests removal of the existing Beach
Renourishment Permit Condition requiring removal of the stormwater outfalls. It
is still the intent of the City to explore all practical and feasible options for
eventual removal to the best extent possible. Stormwater runoff impacts will
eventually be addressed by regulatory agencies and permit requirements as new
water quality discharge criteria is determined.
Thank you, again, for your assistance and involvement.
Sincerely,
fl. hJJf-- r1~
A. William Moss
City Manager
Cc: Gary McAplin, Collier County Director of Coastal Zone Management
,
(//:/>;;"///"/,, ,/11,/,.".
/:-///>,. /- ,/,i:;-) /0';-" .v:/,'" <////1:/7' /~/ nll//i~// dY ,/.
CAC June 10, 2010
Vlllv1 New Business
1 of 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman
OBJECTIVE: Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman.
CONSIDERATIONS: Councilman Sorey has completed the one-year term as chairman. In
accordance with Ordinance No. 200] -03 at its earliest opportunity, the membership of the
Committee shall elect a chairman and vice-chairman from among the members. Officers' terms
shall be for a period of one (I) year, with eligibility for reelection.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A.
COUNTY ATTORNEY FINDING: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan
related to this action.
RECOMMENDATION: N/A
PREPARED BY: Gail Hambright, Accountant
CAC June 10, 2010
VIIl-2 New Business
1 of 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Determine summer schedule for CAC meetings
OBJECTIVE: To determine summer schedule for CAC Meetings.
CONSIDERATIONS: In the past the CAC took into account the summer schedule of
County and City boards. The following schedules are listed to provide information to
help determine scheduling for the CAC:
1. The Board of County Commissioners will have only one meeting in July
scheduled for July 27, 2010 and will not reconvene until September 14, 2010.
2 The City of Naples will meet in June scheduled for June 16, 2010 and will not
reconvene until August 18, 2010.
3. The City of Marco will only have one meeting in July scheduled for July 19, 2010
and will not reconvene until August 2,2010.
4. The TOC are currently meeting every month and is planning to take August off.
Per last year's scheduling of the above mentioned boards, the CAC did not meet in July
of 2008 and 2009. However, staff is recommending that August be considered this year
for vacation for consistency with the BCC and TOC.
COUNTY ATTORNEY FINDING: A finding by the County Attorney is not required for
this item.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action
RECOMMENDATION: Discuss and make summer schedule
PREPARED BY: Gail Hambright, Tourist Tax Coordinator
CAC June 10, 2010
VIII~3 New Business
1 of 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the attached engineering proposal dated 6/7/2010
from Coastal Engineering Consultants to renourish the Marco South Beaches and
investigate if additional or modified erosion control structures would lengthen the
renourishment cycle for this beach.
OBJECTIVE: Approve the engineering proposal dated 6/7/2010 from Coastal
Engineering Consultants to renourish the Marco South Beaches and investigate if
additional or modified erosion control structures would lengthen the renourishment cycle
for this beach. Anticipated construction will be FY 12/13 or FY 13/14
CONSIDERATIONS: It will take several years to secure the permits to modify or install
additional erosion control structures at the Marco South Beach. This study needs to be
undertaken to determine if:
1. If additional erosion control structures would lengthen the renourishment cycle
and if so what would the most likely cost, savings and cycle be Preliminary
modeling and historical analysis.
2 Can any of the existing structures be modified to achieve the same result?
Preliminary modeling and historical analysis.
3. At a minimum obtain a permit to repair the existing structures.
4. Investigate the Sand sources of Capri Pass, Caxambas Pass and Cape Romano
Shoals for beach renourishment sand.
5. Model the Beach renourishment to determine the optimum renourishment scope.
6. Can this project be combined with the major mainland renourishment project for
savings?
7. Prepare report and present.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of
this proposal.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax
fund 195
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the engineering proposal dated 6/7/2010 from Coastal
Engineering Consultants to renourish the Marco South Beaches and investigate if
additional or modified erosion control structures would lengthen the renourishment cycle
for this beach.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
CAC June 10, 2010
Vlll-3 New Business
2 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishment & Structural tnhancements
CEC Contract No. 09.5262
Scope oj Work
SCHEDULE "A"
WORK ORDER NO.1
TASK 1: PLAN FORMULATION & PROJECT UPDA TE
Phase A: Beach Fill Volume Update
Utilizing COUNTY provided controlled digital photography and 2009 annual monitoring
surveys (beach profiles. inlet. shoals. etc.); CEC shall apply the permitted beach fill template and
update the volume requirements for the 2012-13 Beach Renourishment Ptoject following the
description in the FEMA Project Worksheet, Declaration No. l785DRFL.
Phase B: Borrow Area Screening
Utilizing COUNTY provided borrow area surveys and data, CEC shall conduct an alternatives
analysis of the existing permitted borrow areas including Caxambas Pass (South Marco prior
source), Capri Pass (Hideaway Beach prior source), Tom's Hill (Collier County prior source)
and Cape Romano Shoal (new source). Parameters to be evaluated include quality, quantity
(compared to the fill volume needs defined in Phase 1), location, environmental impacts,
navigation interests, cost, and synergy with Collier County's other beach nourishment project
needs. A compatibility analysis shall be performed using ex isting sediment data for both the
native beach and the permitted borrow areas. Based on the analysis, CEC shall rank the borrow
areas and recommend the optimal source(s) for inclusion in the Project.
Phase C: Project Description Update
Based upon the results of Phases I and 2, CEC shall update the Project Description and
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the 2012-13 Beach Renourishment
Project.
Phase D: Structural Alternatives Screening
Building upon the project performance to date, and relying upon our historical perspective of the
South Marco project goals, objectives, permit issues, and design standards, as well as the
COUNTY.s other consultants' reporting and analyses, CEC shall conduct an evaluation offiscal,
environmental, and institutional parameters to screen the following structural alternatives, or
combination of alternatives, for inc Ius ion in the Project.
. Repair existing breakwaters: restore existing structures to their original design templates,
. Repair existing terminal groins: restore existing structures to their original design templates,
. Modify existing breakwaters: relocate. resize, and / or realign existing structures,
. Modify existing terminal groins: relocate, resize, and / or realign existing structures, and
. Enhance existing breakwaters: add new structure(s) to enhance existing structures.
Based upon the analysis, CEC shall rank the structural alternatives and recommend the two most
favorable alternatives for the Modeling Task. The recommendation shall include the justification
for carrying the selected alternatives forward along with the rationale for eliminating the other
alternatives. The purpose of the structural assessment is to complement the beach fill for
enhancing Project performance, extending Project life, and increasing the interval between
renourishment events.
Page I of7
June 7, 20](]
CAC June 10,2010
VHI.3 New Business
3 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishment & Structural Enhancements
CEC Contract No, 09.5262
Scope oj Work
Phase E: Plan Formulation Report
CEC shall prepare and submit to the COUNTY a draft Report to present the results of Plan
Pormulation including beach fill volume update, borrow area recommendations, updated Project
Description and Preliminary Opinion of Cost, and structural alternative recommendations. CEC
shall meet with the County to review the results and obtain comments. CEC shall revise and
submit the final Plan Formulation Report to the County.
TASK 2: MODELING
Phase A: Data Collection and Analysis
CEC shall review COUNTY provided data, as well as, request and obtain existing data that may
be available from other governmental agency sources, for example, Rookery Bay, FDEP,
US ACE, City of and Marco Island. It is assumed that additional hydrodynamic infonnation will
need to be obtained in order to calibrate the numerical models proposed for use in subsequent
analysis. At this time, the following field data collection program is proposed:
. CEC shall install tide gages and current meters (or combination units) to measure water
levels and velocities at two prescribed locations (offshore and within Caxambas Pass) for a
total period of 30 days. The instrumentation will be recovered mid-month and again at the
end of the month.
. Water level and current velocity data will be down loaded, reviewed and processed to provide
a record of conditions during the 30 day deployment. CEC will then integrate the new
information with similar data obtained from historical sources, noting any trends apparent in
comparison to the historical information.
After completing Plan Formulation and reviewing the existing literature, CEC will recommend
any changes to the COUNTY prior to initiating the field work.
Phase B: Regional Wave and Storm Statistics
Using the existing literature and data related to the general wind, wave and sediment transport
processes affecting the project area, CEC shall develop a general understanding of the wave
energy shaping the area's shorelines and characterize the geomorphic and littoral processes in the
project area. CEC shall prepare tables summarizing the matrix of wave height, period, and
direction conditions to be used in the modeling.
Using the historical storm data available in the literature, CEC shall compile report storm
statistics with respect to wave height, period, direction and return interval and recommend the
design storm parameters for use in the mode ling.
Phase C: Model Calibration and Validation
CEC shall perform a detailed modeling analyses of selected alternatives. CEC shall calibrate and
validate the models using historical records such as bathymetric surveys, dredge and fill records,
aerial photography, and collected field data. In concert with model formulation and application,
CEC shall:
. perform a desktop analyses of available wave, tide, sediment, morphology and dredging data
to formulate the appropriate model domain and boundary forcing information:
Page 2 of7
JullC 7, 2010
CAC June 10, 2010
VIIl-3 New Business
4 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishrnent & Structured Enhancements
CEC Contract No. 09-5262
Scope oj Work
. conduct an analytic assessment of sediment transport and morphological behavior of the
inlet-beach system to formulate appropriate parameters for model application and to identify
a range of reasonable model results:
. apply an integrated 20 numerical model, (such as MIKE 21 or equivalent) including dynamic
coupling of wave, hydrodynamic and morphological modules: and
· validate the model via qualitative comparisons with measured changes and dredge records
and via sensitivity analysis.
The modeling program shall be performed following the guidelines established by FDEP.
Deviations from the guidelines shall be reported to the COUNTY as appropriate.
Phase D: Sediment Budget
Using historical data, CEC shall compute shoreline and volumetric changes. Combined with the
results of the modeling, CEC shall develop the sediment budget for the project area. The
sediment budget shall including estimates of the potential longshore transport rates along Marco
Island central and south beach reaches as well as Kice Island, shoaling rate at Caxambas Pass,
and order of magnitude of gross and net alongshore sediment transport into and out of the Project
area.
Phase E: Alternatives Analysis
Once the model has been calibrated and validated, CEC shall model the beach fill only
alternative and beach fill with the two structural alternatives determined in Plan Formu lation. For
each alternative, CEC shall predict sediment transport magnitude and directions, bathymetric
changes, beach fill diffusion, shoal development and channel sedimentation rates. Based upon
the model results, for each alternative, CEC shall:
. depict predicted changes in coastal processes;
· prepare a table and plan-view depiction of the expected sediment budget;
. qualitatively assess the expected performance, advantages and disadvantages;
. assess the likely issues or concerns of permitting agencies, permit requirements, and
feasibility of obtaining permits;
. prepare a conceptual opinion of probable costs including initial costs, maintenance costs, and
annualized costs for a 30 year project life; and
. summarize the evaluation parameters in matrix format.
Phase F: Modeling Report
CEC shall prepare and submit to the County a draft Report describing the data collection and
analysis, calibration and validation of the model, alternative analysis and results, and
recommendation for the preferred structural alternative to advance to Preliminary Design. CEC
shall meet with the County to review the results and obtain comments. CEC shall revise and
submit the final Modeling Report to the County.
TASK III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Phase A: Pre-Application Conferences
CEC shall update the Project Description and prepare a Project Justification Document that
identifies and describes the necessity and justification including consideration of the public
Page3of7
June 7, 2010
CAC June 10, 2010
VIII-3 New Business
5 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishment & Structural Enhancements
CEC Contract No. 09-5262
Scope oj Work
interest in shore protection and restoration and potential impacts of the Project. with particular
attention to potential impacts to the Caxambas Pass shoals and historical shorebird nesting areas.
The report shall address compliance with Section 404(b)(l) of the Guidelines of the Clean Water
Act and the "Public Interest Assessment" criteria cited in Section 373.414, Horida Statutes. The
Document will be (a) reviewed and approved by the COUNTY prior to distribution, (b)
distributed to USACE and FDEP staff in advance of the pre-application conferences, and (c)
serve as a foundation for the "Project Purpose and Need" section of the Joint Coastal Permit
(JCP) Application.
CEC will arrange, attend, and chair two pre-application conferences including COUNTY staff
with (I) FDEP regulatory and project management staff along with state commenting agency
staff (FFWCC), and (2) USACE regulatory staff and federal commenting agencies (NMFS,
USFWS, EPA). In general, the purpose of the pre-application conferences shall be to present the
Project including the results of Plan Formulation and Modeling, solicit agency input on
regulatory matters, identify if the current Project shall be processed as a new application or a
major modification to the existing permit, define requirements for obtainment of permit
approvals, and discuss requirements for mitigation. CEC shall prepare and submit to the
COUNTY a written summary of each conference.
Phase B: Preliminary Design
Utilizing the annual monitoring surveys (beach profiles, inlet, shoals, etc.) to be performed by
the COUNTY's other consultants, CEC shall prepare preliminary design drawings in the form of
8 Vi' x 11" permit drawings. Utilizing the existing borrow area data, marine surveys, and
environmental surveys, CEC shall determine the design borrow area cuts to yield the fill volume
requirements and identify potential pipeline corridors and marine vessel transport corridors from
the selected borrow areas to the beach fill. CEC shall prepare the preliminary design of the
preferred structural alternative.
The preliminary plans shall include location map; vicinity map; plan views depicting beach fill,
borrow areas, coastal structures, construction access and staging areas, potential pipeline
corridors and transport corridors: cross sections depicting dredge templates and beach fill
templates; coastal structure sections and details; survey control: dune plantings; and
environmcntal protection measures. The preliminary plans shall serve as the permit drawings for
the JCP Application. Based on the preliminary design documents, CEC shall update the
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. CEC will meet with the COUNTY to
review the preliminary design. CEC shall finalize the preliminary design documents based on the
COUNTY review and comments.
Phase C: Environmental Assessment
CEC shall calculate potential mitigation requirements based on FDEP UMAM procedures (or
other approved functional assessment methods as may be prescribed by the USACE, FFWCC,
NMFS or USFWS) and identify potential mitigation methods and mitigation areas. CEC shall
prepare for COUNTY review and approval an Environmental Assessment (EA) documenting the
location, quantity, and quality (including functions and values) of environmental resources in the
Project area and borrow areas; summarize probable environmental and historic resource impacts;
address potential pipeline and transport corridor impacts to resources within the corridors: and
Page 4 of7
June 7, 2010
CAe June 10, 2010
Vlfl-3 New Business
6 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishment & Structural Enhancements
CEC Contract No. 09-5262
Scope oj Work
incorporate the potential mitigation quantities, site locations, mitigation techniques, and
associated mitigation costs.
TASK IV. .fCP APPLICA nON
Phase A: Supporting Documents: CEC shall prepare for COUNTY review and approval the
following permit Supporting Documents:
o physical monitoring plan.
o sediment QNQC plan,
o endangered species protection plans,
o biological monitoring plan,
o turbidity monitoring plan, and
o mitigation and monitoring plan.
Phase B: Permit Application
CEC shall prepare for COUNTY review and approval, a draft JCP application for the FDEP and
USACE permits and casements required for the Project including an "Application for Joint
Coastal Permitting. Authorization to Use Sovereign Submerged Lands. and Federal Dredge and
Fill Permit" and a Public Easement or Consent (1. Use for each pipeline corridor. The application
shall include the following:
o COUNTY provided documents (e.g. local consistency letter with comprehensive plan,
existing borrow area permits and MMS leases for the two offshore areas, agent authorization
letter)
o permit sketches (preliminary plans completed in Task Ill),
o sketch and legal description for each pipeline corridor,
o EA (prepared in Task 1II),
o alternatives analysis and modeling results (prepared in Task II), and
o existing geotechnical data formatted for inclusion in the ROSS database.
In the application, CEC will request:
o final design plans be a condition for issuance of a "Notice to Proceed' following agency
review and acceptance and/or modification of the preliminary design,
o mixing zone within the fill area, and
o waiver of dredge fees for use of borrow material obtained from sovereign lands.
CEC shall incorporate COUNTY review comments and submit the JCP Application and
Supporting Documents to FDEP and USACE.
TASK V: PERMIT PROCESSING
Phase A: FDEP and USACE Permit Processing: Subsequent to submittal of the permit
application, CEC will serve as the COUNTY's agent for the permit process. CEC will
proactively contact FDEP and USACE staff to informally monitor the process, address staff
questions, and facilitate agency consideration of the application. CEC will verify the JCP
Page 5 017
June 7, 2010
CAC June 10.2010
VIII~3 New Business
7 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishment & Structural Enhancements
CEC Contract No. 09-5262
Scope of Work
Application processing fee amount and notify the COUNTY when payment is due to FOEP. As
needed, CEC will compile, clarify, and provide existing information as may be requested by
FOEP and USACE staff. CEC will seek to negotiate permit condition(s) for the project that are
acceptable to the COUNTY.
Phase B: RAI Response: For the purposes of this Scope, it is expected that FOEP and USACE
will make two (2) requests for additional information (RAIl each, and that one (I) meeting will
be required with FOEP staff in Tallahassee to favorably conclude the permit application. It is
assumed that existing information (including design details/analysis) will be sufficient to meet
permit application requirements with minor adjustments, clarifications, or analysis. If FOEP
mandates additional surveys, reports, modeling analysis or and studies beyond those identified
herein, CEC will undertake these additional tasks under separate authorization as approved by
the COUNTY.
TASK VI: FINAL DESIGN
Phase A: Construction Plans and Technical Specifications
Based on the permit processing results including comments received from the agencies, accepted
preliminary design documents, and the 2011 annual monitoring surveys (beach profiles, inlet,
shoals, etc.) to be performed by the COUNTY's other consultants, CEC will prepare for review
and approval by the County, construction plans and technical specifications to show the general
scope, character and extent of the work to be furnished and performed by the contractor. CEC
shall design the final beach fill, borrow area, and coastal structure plans including horizontal and
vertical control, survey baseline, construction access and staging areas, beach fill limits, design
fill templates, dune construction limits, vegetation details, pipeline corridors, marine vessel
transport corridors, borrow area dredge templates, coastal structure design sections and details,
and construction quantities. CEC shall prepare a Final Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.
CEC shall review the COUNTY's standard general conditions. instructions to bidders, etc... and
prepare for review and approval by the COUNTY, supplemental conditions and bid forms for
inclusion in the Bid Documents.
ASSUMPTIONS
Based on multiple discussions with Coastal Zone Management, CEC understands the following.
I. Annual Monitoring Surveys
The COUNTY shall provide the following surveys for 2009, 2010, and 2011 for use in the
Project design, thus no beach, inlet and shoal, and borrow area bathymetric surveys are included
in the scope:
. controlled (scale rectified) digital photography,
. beach profile, inlet, and shoal survey data as xyz files in Excel or similar file format, and
. monitoring reports.
Page 60r7
June 7, 2010
CAC June 10.2010
VIII-3 New Business
8 of 8
Collier County
South Marco Beach Renourishment & Structural Enhancements
CEC Contract No. 09-5262
Scope oj Work
II. Borrow Areas
The COUNTY shall provide the following data for the existing borrow areas (Caxambas Pass,
Capri Pass, Tom's Hill, and Cape Romano Shoal). thus no borrow area surveys are included in
the scope:
. "post-dredging" surveys of the three borrow arcas associated with prior nourishment events,
. geophysical survey data in appropriate digital format,
. geotechnical survey data such as jet probes, vibracore logs and photos, gradation curves, and
related sediment tests in appropriate digital format,
· magnetometer survey reports and/or results in appropriate digital format,
. Cultural Resourccs survey reports and/or archeological reports,
. existing permits, and
. MMS Leases for the two offshore sources.
III. Miscellaneous
The COUNTY shall provide the following:
· Environmental Assessments, Permit Documents, and Related Reports,
. Funding related tasks (FEMA coordination, public access requirements, etc.),
· Permit Fees,
. Public Noticing,
· Local Consistency Letter with Comprehensive Plan, and
· Agent Authorization Letter.
Further, because this is the next maintenance cycle of the existing permitted Project, CEC bases
this scope on the following:
. The Project has an established Erosion Control Line for the entire shoreline to be
renourished,
· The COUNTY has its own property or has obtained construction easements from private
upland property owners for construction access and staging and to allow for placement and
maintenance of beach fill and coastal structures upland of the ECL, and
. Because the COUNTY has permitted the four (4) borrow areas (noted above), wave
refraction analyses to verify that no adverse impacts to adjacent shorelines will occur from
borrow area excavation will not be required.
BUDGET
TASK DESCRIPTION FEE
I Plan Formulation Update $ 25,000
11 Modeling $ 80,000
III Preliminary Design $ 95.000
IV JCP Application $ 35,000
V Permit Processing $ 85,000
VI Final Design $ 30,000
Contingencies (10%) $ 35,000
Page 7 of7
June 7, 2010
GAG June 10, 2010
VIII-4 New Business
10f6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approval Yearly Physical Beach and Inlet Monitoring
Contract as proposed by PBS&J.
OBJECTIVE: Approve the Yearly Physical Beach and Inlet Monitoring Contract as
approved by PBS&J.
CONSIDERATIONS: Yearly physical monitoring of the beaches and inlets is required
by FDEP permit.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of
the attached proposal by PBS&J.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax
fund 195.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: To approve Yearly Physical Beach and Inlet Monitoring
Contract.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
CAC June 10, 2010
VlIl-4 New Business
2of6
Professional Engineering Services
for
Fixed Term Physical Monitoring Services for Coastal Management
PBS&J is pleased to provide a scope of work for Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department.
The intention of this Work Assignment is to provide professional guidance, preparation of project
documentation (monitoring reports) and expert review of project information for the Physical Monitoring
of the Collier County coastline. In accordance with Col]icr County Contract Number 08-5]24 the
following scope of work is presented herein.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
This monitoring will take place on various beaches and inlets of Collier County as indicated below. The
following is a list of expected monitoring locations. These locations are inclusive but may vary from year
to year depending on permit conditions. Please refer to previous monitoring reports for exact boundaries,
survey locations, ranges and control monuments. Consistency with previous surveys is extremely critical
and significant to Collier County. Contractors/consultants will have the responsibility to complete
monitoring for the respective beach segment during the times indicated for each segment. Locations and
monitoring timing is as follows
. Vanderbilt Beach physical beach monitoring and report perfonned in May - June each year.
. Park Shore Beach physical beach monitoring and report performed in May - June each year.
. Naples Beach physical monitoring and report performed in May - June each year.
. South Marco Beach physical monitoring and report performed in December - January each year.
. Delnor-Wiggins State Park Beach physical monitoring and report performed in April - May each
year.
. Clam Pass Beach physical monitoring and report performed in April - May each year.
. Wiggins Pass Inlet/interior channel/borrow area and report performed in April- May each year.
. Clam Pass inlet and interior channel performed in April - May each year.
. Doctors Pass inlet and interior channel performed in May - June each year.
. Caxambas Pass inlet/borrow area performed in December -- January each year.
. Hideaway beach borrow area performed in December - January each year.
Beach and Nearshore Hydrographic Survey
All work shall be conducted in accordance to Section 01000 (Beach Profile Topographic Surveying) and
0] 100 (Offshore Profile Surveying) of the March 2004 Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects including field methodology and final
del iverab les. hltp:/ /www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/publ i cations/pdf/standard. pdf
Prior to the start of the survey a reconnaissance of FDEP second order monuments is required to confinn
that survey control is in place and undisturbed using Real Time Kinematic Global Positioning System
(RTK GPS). ]n order to achieve required accuracy, the survey shall be controlled using FDEP 2nd order
monuments. All assessable 2nd and 3rd order FDEP control monuments in the project area shall be
located using RTK GPS.
Topographic and Hydrographic profile surveys will be collected. All data seaward of the dune shall be
collected using RTK GPS technology. Upland areas inaccessible to RTK GPS shall be collected using
CAC June 10,2010
VIH-4 New Business
3016
standard difTerentialleveling techniques. Upland topography shall extend approximately 150 feet
landward of the vegetation line or until an obstacle is encountered.
An ACSM Certified Hydrographer shall oversee all hydrographic surveys for nearshore, offshore and
inlet surveys. Hydrographic portions of the profile line shall be collected from a survey vessel equipped
with RTK GPS technology and a dynamic motion sensor to provided instantaneous tide and motion
corrections. Standard hydrographic procedures shall be followed including all necessary quality control
checks. Horizontal and vertical positioning checks will be conducted at the beginning and end of each day
using second order FDEP monuments located in the project area. The fathometer will be calibrated via
bar-checks and a sound velocity probe at the beginning and end of each day. The DIGIBAR PRO sound
velocity meter or equivalent which provides a fast additional calibration for sound velocity as compared
to the traditional bar check shall be used. More specifically, bar checks will be performed from a depth of
five feet to a maximum depth of twenty-five feet. Analog data showing the results of the bar check
calibration will be displayed on the fathometer charts at five foot increments during descent and ascent of
the bar.
In order to maintain the vessel navigation along the prolile lines HYP ACK navigation software or
equivalent shall be used. This software shall provided horizontal position to the sounding data allowing
real-time review of the profile data in plan view or cross section format. The navigation software shall
also provided navigation to the helm to control the deviation from the online azimuth. The landward
limits of the hydrographic survey shall be based on a minimum of fifty feet beyond the seaward extent of
the beach profile. Profiles shall extend seaward beyond the depth of closure, or 2,500 feet offshore,
whichever is further.
A Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) shall signed and sealed the required DEP survey reports
which shall included field survey notes, profile plots, GIS plan view maps, photographs in both directions
along the beach and towards the dune also a close-up of the monument when found as well as all other
required deliverables included in Section 0100 and 01100 of the FDEP Monitoring Standards for Beach
Erosion control Projects http://www.dep.state.flus/beaches/publications/pdtlstandard.pdf. Four copies of
the report along with a CD version will be provided to the County.
Navigafion Channel and Interior Inlet Hydrographic Survey
Nearshore cross-sections will be surveyed as per the previous post-construction survey events. An ACSM
Certified Hydrographer shall oversee the hydrographic survey. All work will be conducted in accordance
to Section 01200 (Borrow Site, Shoal and Other Bathymetric Surveying) of the March 2004 Bureau of
Beaches and Coastal Systems Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects.
Cross-sections will be collected from a survey vessel equipped with RTK GPS technology and a dynamic
motion sensor to provided instantaneous tide and motion corrections. Standard hydrographic procedures
shall be followed including all necessary quality control checks. Horizontal and vertical positioning
checks will be conducted at the beginning and end of each day. The fathometer will be calibrated via bar-
checks and a sound velocity probe at the beginning and end of each day. The DIGIBAR PRO sound
velocity meter or equivalent which provides a fast additional calibration for sound velocity as compared
to the traditional bar check shall be used. More specifically, bar checks will be performed from a depth of
five feet to a maximum depth of twenty-five feet or a depth representing the maximum potential depth of
CAe June 10,2010
VIII~4 New Business
4of6
the survey area. Analog data showing the results of the bar check calibration will be displayed on the
fathometer charts at five foot increments during descent and ascent of the bar. [n order to maintain the
vessel navigation along the profile lines HYPACK navigation software or equivalent shall be used. This
software provided horizontal position to the sounding data allowing real-time review of the profile data in
plan view or cross section format. The navigation software will also provided navigation to the helm to
control the deviation from the online azimuth.
Controlled Aerial Photography Using FDEP Environmental Standards
Color aerial photography shall be obtained for the Collier County Beaches. Surveyors shall coordinate
ground control and GPS logging from HARN and/or CaRS with the designated sub-contractor. A
representative from Collier County will conduct the pre-flight sea condition monitoring and coordinate
with the surveyor and the sub-contractor about the flight timing. Flight must occur during a 24 hour
period of calm sea conditions, low tide levels, and [ow sun/water surface angle to ensure good water
clarity. The flight window will be established by the sub-contractor. The sub-contractor shall provide
9"x9" photographs and CD-ROM controlled raster imagery files. The photography will be collected
following FDEP's standards for:
Environmental Aerial Photography Acquisition for Beach Erosion Control Projects
http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/pu b I i cations/ pd f/standard. pdf (secti on 02000: M arch2004).
Preparation of Post-Project Monitoring Reports
In accordance with FDEP permit protocol; PBS&J shall prepare the second year monitoring reports ror
submission to the Florida Department or Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and
Coastal Systems (BBCS) on behalf of Collier County.
Data collected for the monitoring of the project shall include beach profile surveys, borrow area surveys
and aerial photography. These data will be collected by Morgan & Eklund, Inc for the topographic &
bathymetric survey information and Aerial Cartographics of America, Inc for the aerial photography. The
purpose of the monitoring reports is to summarize and discuss the data, the performance of the beach fill
project, and identify erosion and accretion patterns within the monitored area. In addition, the report shall
include a comparative review of adverse impacts attributable to the project(s). Based on the scope of
work requested by Collier County, PBS&J will only address Range Monuments R-IO through R-89 and
R-140 through R-148. PBS&J will review the data and use the information to create a database to identify
and characterize trends and current conditions of these reaches of Collier County's coastline. The
database will be created to enable visualization and completion of a comparative analysis.
Specific quantities and parameters that will be analyzed, if data are available, include the following:
. Shoreline and volume change rates
. Beach profile evolution
. Post-storm beach profile change (if applicable)
. Bathymetry changes within Wiggins Pass, Doctors Pass, Capri Pass and Caxambas Pass
. Identifying and quantifying areas of acute erosion
. Bathymetry changes across the borrow areas
. Aerial photography assessment
CAC June 10, 2010
Vlll-4 New Business
5of6
The above analyses will provide a qualitative understanding of the project and/or storm-induced
topography and bathymetry changes to the beach and borrow area.
All monitoring reports will include a transmittal referring to applicable FDEP permits, the permit
condition requiring the report and the period in which the monitoring was conducted. The reports will be
submitted as a bound printed report and on a disk in electronic .pdfformat.
PBS&J will prepare for, travel to and attend three (3) meetings. The meetings will be held to coordinate
the project, meet with County staft~ and to provide project updates to the County Project Manager and
other stakeholder representatives as deemed necessary and appropriate. One PBS&J senior engineer will
attend each of these meetings, again as deemed appropriate.
PBS&J will complete monthly updates to County staff on the schedule, task and present budget of the
project. In addition, quarterly progress reports will be prepared that outline project expenses to date and
review the budget and schedule.
Budget Estimate
Work for this assignment will be performed for the lump sum amount of $196,195,13. Work will be
billed to the County on a monthly basis based on the percentage of work completed for the preceding
month.
Schedule Estimate
The following schedule of completion is anticipated.
I. Submit draft monitoring reports within 120 calendar days following the Notice-to-Proceed and
receipt of all required data (surveys and aerial photography) to complete analysis.
Assumptions
I. All existing information/documentation including, but not limited to, survey data, project permits,
environmental information, aerial photography, previous studies, etc. will be provided to the PBS&J
by the County.
2. This quote is based upon project scope outlined in BVO 08-5124 and conversations with County Staff
on June 4'" and June 7'", 20]0.
3. No biological monitoring of artificial reels or hard bottom are included in this scope of work.
4. No side-scan sonar or diver verification of seagrasses, artificial reels or hardbol1om are included in
this scope of work.
5. Aerial photography will be Ilown to FDEP SBCS 02000 Specifications per County direction.
J!!.' ~ ~ v>
'" .... '" .... '" .... ro .... N
0 0 0 0
.:: 0 .:: 0 .:: 0 .:: 0 .-<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.:.
.0 OJ .0 OJ .0 Q) .0 OJ
.0 .0 .0 .0 ~
a ~ .0 E .0 E .0 E .0 E ""
~ OJ OJ OJ OJ ~
0; ~
c " " " " '"
N- "" c: "" c: "" c: "" c: t--
~ c: c: c: c:
g~ '" OJ) '" OJ) '" OJ) '" OJ) .s
. "" c: "" c: "" c: "" c: ~
~ '>- '>- '>- >- N
c ~ 0 0 0 0 '" .-<
oz 0 a. 0 a. 0 a. 0 a. ~ ,.:.
~"t~ -= c. -= c. -= c. -= c. '"
~- " v> " ". " ~' " .... ~
<(::::0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ""
0>", ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" >- '" >- '" >- '" >- ~ '"
c. ~ c. ~ c. ~ c. ~ 'v; t--
c: c: c: c:
.... " .... " .... " .... " 2- c:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '"
OJ U OJ U Q) U Q) U c: ~
OJ) OJ) OJ) OJ) '" '"
'" c: ~ c: ~ c: '" c: ~
~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 OJ)
OJ Q) Q) OJ c: '"
> "" > "" > "" > "" .~ ....
>- 0 OJ >- 0 OJ 0 Q) 0 OJ >- >- >- 0
OJ v ~ OJ v ~ v ~ v ~ Q) Q) Q) Q)
>- 00 1: '" cO > '" cO '" cO '" cO 1: 1: 1: J!!.
OJ ... c: .0 ~ c: .0 c: .0 c: .0 c: '"
> '" " N ... 0 " " 0 " 0 :: 0 " " " " ';;;, ."
'" '" .-< ~ Q) ~ ~ OJ ~ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ N en 00 >'- N ... "" OJ) "" OJ) "" OJ) "" OJ) c: OJ
" Q: >'- , .;<l Q: Q: OJ c: OJ .;<l OJ c: OJ OJ c: OJ OJ c: OJ .;<l .;<l .;<l OJ '"
~ a; 0 .c ~ '" .0 .:: ~ '" .0 ~ '" .0 ~ '" .0 .c .c .c ~ ~
.... 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 '" .c 0 ~ '" .:: 0 '" .c 0 '" .:: 0 ~ ~ ~ OJ Q)
0 ~ ~ ~ 0 c: ~ ~ .0 v ~ c: .0 v ~ .0 v ~ .0 v ~ c: .S .S "" ""
'" CO en 00 ... ~ 0 0 ~ >- ~ ~ >- ~ ~ >- ~ ~ >- ~ ~ ~ " "
OJ N ... en .-< .-< CO ~ '" Q) ~ ~ '" OJ ~ '" OJ ~ '" Q) ~ u u
~ Q: Q: >'- Q: 0 Q: Q: 0 E .s 0 0 E c: 0 E c: 0 E ~ 0 0 0
<( Z U Z U U U Z Z z E E
0 0 0 0 0 0 CO '"
0 0 0 0 0 .-<
0 0 0 '< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-< ui
1;; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD ai
0 0 <l: 0 <l: 0 0 0 <l: <l: <l: ... ... a>
0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 -- -- -- -- .-<
U N 00 N ... Z 00 0 0 Z 0 0 0 Z Z Z ... CO ",-
...' ",' ai" en' ",' ai" en' '" '" '" ...' 0:5 a>
'" '" .-< '" '" '" .-< .-< .-< .-< '" .-< .-<
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
.....
<(
t--
0
t--
OJ)
c:
."
0
~
.C'
0
OJ) E
c: .::
.~ v
'"
..: OJ
c: .0
0 OJ) ~
~ c: 0
....
'" .~ .... ~
OJ OJ v OJ)
'"' OJ) OJ) ..: ~ OJ c:
c: c: OJ) c: OJ) c. ."
." .~ c: 0 c: ro ~ 0
~ 0 ." ~ .~ 'u 0 ~
2 ..: ..: 0 ;;: 0 OJ) C'
c: c: '" ..: 0 c: 0
0 ..: E .c 'g
0 0 c: OJ c: v t:: N E c:
E ~ '"' 0 '" '" ~
'" 0 0 Q. ..: OJ) OJ 0
~ ~ .... OJ W '" c: ~
:::,. V V ~ 0 '" c. 0 c: v ." ~ '"
Q) ro OJ 0 '" '"
c: c: c: '" 2 OJ >- a; 0 E ;;;, 0 ~ v
.c c: c: c: OJ v ~ '" ~ 0 ..: OJ) ;;:
v '" ~ ~ .;;;, V ~ OJ)
'" '" 0 '" ~ ] c: '" ."
'" .:: .:: .:: <l: 0 '" c: "" 0 0 OJ Q)
OJ v U ~ '" 0 OJ OJ ." OJ ." .0 E ~ >
~ '" U ~ .c c: 0 ~ ....
c: ~ 0 0 g v iiJ 0 :E ~ ..!i OJ E 0 ~
OJ) "" ~ ro OJ
c '0 ~ 0 ." ." '" c: I 'C' c. .S 0 v OJ) >
.;: ~ '" .;: OJ Q) 0 OJ E 0 ~ 0 E ~ ';;;, c: 'OJ
<.!) Q. OJ ~ '" '" 0 '" ~ "" ~
0 ~ c: ~ OJ) 0 c: 0 0 .~ ~
>'- Q) c: -- >- ~ v
- c: ~ ~ c: OJ) '" .0 ~ 0
~ '- '"
.C' .c '" '- "" OJ 0 .;: c: OJ) >- "" ..: ~
v o<l ~ ~ c: ~ c: ~ .0 .;: c: .c ~ ~ .0 c:
0 .c ..!i 0 ..!i '"
.c '" V1 .:: ..!i '" '" 0 .~ c. '" 0 c:
:!: v v Q) .:: 1: ~ c: .:: ....
'" v ~ v c: ~ c: ~ Q) C' ..: '" Q) E 0
'" '" '" c: '" ..!i ~ :E '" c: OJ ~ OJ Q) ~
iij Q) OJ .:: ~ 0 c: OJ) ~
0 OJ ';;;, OJ ~ '" .c 0 ~ ~ ro
v '" 00 v '" ~ c: ~ Q. I ~ ;;;, 0 ~ 0 c:
.;;; OJ '" i: 00 .9il '" '" -- Q) E " '" .c '" v '"
"" 0 Q) '" >- ~ ~ Q. ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ ro c: Q. ~ 'u ;;;, v
>- :c ~ ~ '" ~ 0 ~ w .c ~
.:: '" ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ .0 '" v ~ E ~ ;;: 0
Q. ~ .:: ~ ~ ~ Q. c: Q. -~ E Q. .c ';;;, '" ro c. '" E ] Q)
OJ V1 OJ .c '" 0 ';;;, 0 ~ ~ ~ '" OJ -0
>- "" -t a. ~ OJ c: E E ~ '" .;: ~ 0 OJ) ~ '" U c: '" .0 'v;
- c: " :E V '" OJ) v x C. '" 0 '" '" .;: ~
c '" '" '" 0 3 '" 0 '" '" Q) OJ 0 Q) c: 0 0 0 0 0
:l > Q. Z V1 I 0 U U 0 u u z iiJ V1 u <l: 0 z z z z z
0 .'" .-< N CO ... en
U 0 .-< N CO ... en '" '" c.
~ .-< N CO ... en '" '" 00 '" .-< .-< .-< .-< .-< .-< .-< .-< E
~ "" "" -" -" -" -" -" "" -" "" -" -" -" -" -" -" "" "
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~
U t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- t-- <l:
CAC June 10, 2010
VllI-5 New Business
1of5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Wiggins Pass FY 11 Dredging Engineering as
proposed by CP&E.
OBJECTIVE: To approve Wiggins Pass FY Dredging Engineering as proposed by
CP&E.
CONSIDERATIONS: Wiggins Pass will require another maintenance dredging or two
before the permanent solution is implemented Currently at low tide, less than three
foot draft vessels are grounding at the mouth of the pass.
Prepare engineering required to obtain a permit and NTP to complete this maintenance
dredging after turtle season at 11/1/2010 but before 5/1/2011.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of
this proposal.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax
fund 195.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: To approve Wiggins Pass FY Dredging Engineering as
proposed by CP&E
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
CAC June 10, 2010
VIII-S New Business
2 of 5
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
e
2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431
561-391-8102 PHONE 561-391-9116 FACSIMILE
Websi1e: www.coastalolannina.net
E-mail: Wail@coaslaIDlgnnina.net
June 7, 2009
Gary McAlpin
Director
Collier County Coastal Zone Management
W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite ]03
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 341]2
Re: Interim Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging Project
Permit Application with Plans (Contract No. 09-5262)
Dear Gary:
This letter is in response to your request for a proposal for coastal engineering and ecological
services for the permitting maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass. The State and Federal
permits have lapsed, and a new comprehensive permit for Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging
and Navigation Improvements will take a long time to be processed. The following services are
proposed to prepare a permit application and develop dredging plans for an interim project:
I. Wiggins Pass Permit and Design ($20,000 T&M Not to Exceed)
Wiggins Pass Penn it Plans: The pennit sketch and plans will include plan views and cross-
sections sufficient for the permitting and construction of the ebb channel maintenance dredging
project and disposal in the near shore of Barefoot Beach. The plan will exclude the flood shoal
and Delnor- Wiggins Park, which would be more difficult to permit. The plan will be modeled
after the previous 2009 plans prepared by CPE. The spoil site and channel dredge template will
be delineated with the same cross sections allowed by previous FDEP and USACE permit
conditions. The plans will be based on a new survey developed under a different contract. The
permit sketches and construction plans will share similar pages. The dredge volume will be
calculated.
Wiggins Pass Construction Specifications: None
Prepare Permit Application: A JCP permit application will be prepared, with heavy reliance on
the existing Comprehensive Permit Application for Maintenance Dredging and Navigation
Improvements. Consultation will be conducted with FDEP and the Corps of Engineers to see if
the process can be expedited and streamlined based on the prior permit and the comprehensive
permit applications currently under review. Responses to Request for Additional Information
','> '~'H'''_'''._''~''~~,~_",~~_,
CAC June 10, 2010
VIII-5 New Business
3of5
Interim Wiggins Pass Permit Application
June 7, 2010
Page 2
will be prepared and provided to the extent budgeted. Sufficient copies of the permit application
will be created for submittals to the FDEP and the Corps of Engineers along with a copy for
Collier Counry with copies on CD.
Compensation
The estimated cost for our services is $20,000 and detail is provided in the attached cost
breakdown. It is our understanding that the County will pay us on a time and material basis and
cover all permit fees.
Very truly yours,
cc: Sheri Dindial, CPE
enclosures
F:\marketing\]roposals\Collier\2010/WP Interim Permit/wiggin;; rass interim permit letter and sow
. I
0' g~ I
~ .~ . 81 0
.0 ! ~I ~~~
~- ~ 5u
n
,.
u"
-0::="
u>. ~~~ 80
-0::10 w, aJ~*
<>:<(!.
~~W 00
",0.'"
..0 -~~
Ulg~
SQ~~ 88
~. .0.
o .0 NO'
oI ;;:;:;
w~
~~ 8
." o~::;:
00
E~
~~~ a 8g
.2 " 000
~ 8 ~ . "~~
~ ow~
~
>' ~]~l? g~
~
Z ~ ~ .~ g ~ ~ON
" ~E~!- ;;,;;;
0 w
"'u
ZO: e'
:l!!! .' ~ ~ ~ a
0.; a
~~ u o;?:::;:
~ . j Ii:f
00
zu g o>~ "
~'" S
~w
~~ ~~~ 0
00
wo: " 00 o~...
~w .,~!.
,,'"
z~
-~
:S~N I~ ~ ~ 'f 8 ~
~8~ 10::"'''5 O;?~ 0
o~, 'ft 8 ~!. ;;; ~
wo~
~ :rl 0 ~
c(~~ ~~llJ~ 088 W
z Z u 00 .
~ a:: ~ ... o..U" .' w~~ ~
</lg !
zw . 0
~wo .
zU "
~~ <> ~:t: ~ 80 1
ij ~ .~~ "'u-i~
~~ uw~ N~S 0
~~
-~
"0 ~~; 80 il
~U
~o: Eg>:f ~:g~ '"
~o "W~ ;;;" ~
~~
w~
~~
z'"
-0 w
~
0 ~
0: Z
~ .
w .
w e
~
'"
z
:l
~
0
:i w
< z z
. S
. Q "
~ ~
~ ,o.z
U !~i~
:J ,I.
~ Uu
~ II-::J
~ W"
~ :"'0-
iUJ<l:
;; I~ t:
0: :::E::E ,
w <<
~ ww 0 ~
w "" I
0: ww g~~ 0
~ << u
~ .. 0<0 "
W "" " ~ ~ .
ww ~~.& e
0: << 000 0
~ "" e~~ e
~ ,< .
CAC June 10, 2010
V11I-5 New Business
5 of 5
Schedule B
Contract No: 09-5262 "County Wide Engineering Services"
Standard Hourly Rate Schedule for all disciplines
Personnel Cateqorv
Stmdard Hourly Rate
Principal
$195
$165
$148
$155
$119
$85
$65
$140
$110
$115
Senior PrOject Manager
Project Manager
Senior Engineer
Engineer
Senior Inspector
Inspector
Senior Planner
Planner
Senior Designer
Designer
$100
Environmental Specialist
$115
Senior GIS Specialist
$145
GIS Specialist
$100
Clerical
$60
Surveyor and Mapper
$130
CADD Technician
$85
$130
$160
$180
Survey Crew ~ 2 man
Survey Crew ~ 3 mall
Survey Crew ~ 4 man
This list IS not mtended to be all-II ,elusive Hourly rate fees for other categories of profeSSional, support
and other services shall be mutui'lly negotiated by the County and firm on a project by project basis as
needed,
CAC June 10.2010
VIII-6 New Business
1 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the attached Change Order to PBS&J's contract for
Clam Pass/Bay required to address additional information requested by FDEP
and the USACE for the Clam Pass maintenance dredging permit.
OBJECTIVE: Approve the attached Change Order to PBS&J's contract for Clam
Pass/Bay required to address additional information requested by FDEP and the
USACE for the Clam Pass maintenance dredging permit.
CONSIDERATIONS: The USACE and FDEP are requesting additional information not
in included PBS&J's current scope of work. This is required to secure the Maintenance
dredging permit for Clam Bay and expected to cost $69,050 Contract will be on a T&M
not to exceed basis.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of
this item.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax
fund 195.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: To approve Change Order No. with PBS&J for Clam Pass/Bay
for time and material not to exceed $69,050.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
Contract 07-4153
June 4. 2010
CAG June 10, 2010
VIIl-6 New Business
2 of 5
SCOPE-Of-WORK
Additional Work Request
Change Order #3
WO#45-100227
Contract # 07-4153
May 18,2010
CLAM PASSIBAY ESTUARY
PBS&J is pleased to provide a scope of work for Clam Pass/Bay Estuary. The intention of this
Work Assignment is to provide professional guidance, preparation of project documentation,
respond to peer review comments and expert review of project information for Clam Pass and
Bay Estuary. In accordance with Collier County Contract Number 07-4153 "Professional
Engineering Services for Coastal Zone Management Projects" the following scope of work is
presented herein.
Current Understanding - On March 24, 20 I 0, PBS&J received comments (request for
additional information (RAI)) back from FDEP concerning the Clam Pass JCP plans and
design. After thorough analysis of the request for information, meetings were held on May 4
and 7, 2010 with Merrie Beth Neely, Jennifer Koch and other staff members at the Department
to discuss clarification and potential relief on specific questions and additional requirements
listed in the letter. Specifically questions 23, 25, 27, 31, 33 and 39 were discussed to clarify the
level of analysis and information required to respond. Results of the meeting indicate the need
to complete further analyses in order to respond to the RAI. Based on the outcome of the
FDEP meetings the following scope of services is listed below.
In addition, the USACE provided a package to PBS&J on June 2, 2010 that included
approximately 100 public comments/questions regarding the permit application. As part of the
permit process these questions will have to be addressed.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 3 - Clam Pass Application for .Joint Coastal Permit
It iUiI {il Pertuits'
Material and documentation required for to respond to the RAI will be prepared and submitted
to the regulatory agency; Florida Department of Environmental Protection. A total of four (4)
meetings will be held with the regulatory agencies to review the RAls, public comments, and
prepare necessary response(s), etc. Appropriate changes to the design documents will be made
following review and approval by County staff.
This scope of services does not include for any type of detailed environmental documentation
such as a mitigation plan, Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement
PBS&J
Contract 07-4153
June 4, 2010
CAe June 10, 2010
VIII-6 New Business
3 of 5
SCOPE-Of-WORK
(EIS). Any items out-of-scope will be discussed with the County and a scope of services will
be provided.
FDEP Response: Based on the comments received from FDEP (dated March 24, 2010) the
following areas will be addressed:
. Revised drawings and plan sets to include items requested in RAI comment No. 23.
. Address comments with regards to the proposed mixing zone limits, edge of nearshore
edge of hardbottom, minimize any impacts to natural resources, etc., RAI comments
No. 25 and 33.
. Respond to comments regarding the geotechnical data, hammer cores, sediment
sampling and beach compatibility analysis, RAI comment No. 27.
. Provide clarification of proposed impacts to natural resources (seagrass, Thalassia
testudimun), RAI comment No. 33.
. Analysis the cross-section area of the proposed dredge template, within the proposed
impacted area, to determine if minimum flow requirements can be maintained, RAI
comment 33.
. Calculate the required application fee based on the above application revisions, RAI
comment No. 39. All application fees will be paid by the County.
USACE Response: Based on the comments received from USACE (dated June], 2010) the
following areas will be addressed (respond to item No.3):
. Provide description of the criteria and/or thresholds that will be used to determine the need
for periodic dredging activities in the proposed work area: please identify the responsible
party associated with such determination(s);
. Provide description of the water quality parameters that are anticipated to improve as a
result of the proposed work - include data that describe past/current "impaired" conditions
and describe the anticipated quantitative improvements to water quality;
. Provide confirmation that the proposed work area is consistent with the previous dredge
template/footprint; please provide a mapping/ground-truth reference for any such
statement (e.g., use of coordinate datalGPS, etc.) that supports adherence to the historical
footprint during project activities:
. Provide a narrative that addresses public interest review factors; the narrative should
demonstrate that the project is clearly in the public interest (typical public interest review
factors include: conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, land use, navigation, shore
erosion and accretion, recreation, water quality, safety, and consideration of property
ownership ).
. Perform a site visit with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) of the project site
to review resources within the area to be dredged.
Due to the magnitude of comments/questions received (100 plus), the substantive issues raised
in the comment letters will be addressed; and responses will be grouped by topic. The
comments are generally much the same, such that there is no need to respond to each individual
comment letter, but PBS&J will capture the essence of the concerns in the responses and will
look at the individual comments in order to prepare an adequate response. Also, please note that
the responses will be prepared to and for the USACE, and are not to the commenting parties;
~S~ 2
Contract 07-4153
June 4. 2010
CAe June 10, 2010
VIII-6 New Business
4 of 5
SCOPE-Of-WORK
however, a future request could prompt release of the documents subject to coordination with
the USACE Office of Counsel.
Note: this task does not include services for responding to legal objections, preparing for expert
testimony or preparing for litigation to the project. These services will be provided under
separate scope and fee to the County. In addition, it is anticipated that additional comments
will be received from National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the preparation of the federal biological opinion (BO).
This scope/fee does not include responding to, meeting with or addressing comments received
From NMFS and USFWS other than those described above.
SCHEDULE
The above scope is based on an estimated twelve (12) month schedule of participation. The
work assignment may be amended if the schedule is extended beyond the eighteen months.
PBS&J will complete weekly updates to County staff on the schedule, task and present budget
of the project. In addition, quarterly progress reports will be prepared that outline project
expenses to date and rcview the budget and schedule.
BUDGET
In accordance with Collier County Contract Number 07-4153 "Professional Engineering
Services for Coastal Zone Management Projects" compensation for the above scope of work
will be based on a Time & Materials charge not to exceed the amount listed below without
authorization from the County.
Task 3 - Respond to FDEP & USACE RAIs
$69,050.00 (Time&Materials)
Total
$69,050.00
0'
~ ,-
- /;//
~ '
....~ / -,
~/_V.4 ---~.
/ Ii
June 4, 2010
JeftYey/R. Tabar
Pi. / .
rOJect DIrector
PBS&J
Date
PBS&J
3
Contract 07AI53
June 4. 2010
CAe June 10.2010
VIII-6 New Business
5of5
SCOPE-OF-WORK
PBSJ
cLLLiU I M F ~L.!~ -S l.!t k'lH'lIl of \c\ '.!.rkJ.lh!.~L:;,'J.1 "in.~iliJ
Client: Collier COlmly
Project: Clam Pass JCP
Project No: TBO
Prepared By: JRT
Labor rates will be billed at or below rates established per the agreerrent number contract # 07-4153
Note: tm may vary depending upon the task assignment and labor rate assigned
Task 3
lep Total Labor
Prcp<lfutioll HolU"s Cost
Sf. Project Manager (JT) 'fi17UlKl 50 $8.5IX)
Principle Ecologist (OT) i>JhlI.OIl 50 $8,(J(X)
Engineer III (BF) q,11:"m t30 $t4.950
Coastal Modeler (ID) i>IIOlX! ]20 $13.200
Junior HydrogeologLst (MS) 'l,lll(l()lJ 130 $]].OO()
Semor Technician (NW) ~,Ih.!IO ]20 $] 1,400
Total Hours 600 6tXJ
Labor Cost $69.050
Reimbursable Costs
Task No. J
Reimbursable
Costs
Sub-Contractors
Total Reimbursables
$0
$0
$0
Total Project Budget
$69,050
$69,050
PBS&J
4
CAe June 10, 2010
VIlI-7 New Business
1 of 10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approval the attached Change Order to Coastal Planning and
Engineering's scope of work for additional Wiggins Pass permit engineering
required to obtain a new permit for Navigational Improvements for Wiggins Pass.
OBJECTIVE: To approve the attached Change Order to Coastal Planning and
Engineering's scope of work for additional Wiggins Pass permit engineering required to
obtain a new permit for Navigational Improvements for Wiggins Pass.
CONSIDERATIONS: FDEP as part of the RAI process has requested additional
vibacore borings at the mouth of Wiggins Pass along with additional engineering
information. This is not included in CP&E's current scope of work and expected to cost
$49,671 on a Time and Material not to exceed basis.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of
this item.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Source of funds is from Category "A" Tourist Development Tax
fund 195.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to this action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Change Order to Coastal Planning and
Engineering scope of work for additional Wiggins Pass permit engineering required to
obtain a new permit for navigational improvements for Wiggins Pass.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, CZM Director
CAC June 10, 2010
VIlI-7 New Business
2 of 10
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
fit
2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARO, BOCA RATON, FL 33431
727-565-4660 PHONE 727-565-4659 FAX
INTERNET: hltp:llwww.coastalplannino.net
e-mail rnail@coastalolannlnq.net
May 26, 2010
Gary McAlpin, Director
Collier County Government
W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite 103
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 341 ] 2
Re: Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project:
Geotechnical Investigation (Contract No. 09-5262)
Dear Gary:
The following scope of work and associated cost proposal for the "Wiggins Pass Maintenance
Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project: Geotechnical Investigation (Contract No. 09-
5262)" is enclosed for review and approval by Collier County.
As part of a 2009 field investigation conducted in support of the Wiggins Pass Improvement
Project, previously compiled geotechnical data as well as newly collected vibracore and jetprobe
data was compiled and analyzed to support navigation improvements. During a recent meeting,
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requested that additional
geotechnical data be collected to determine whether geology is the key factor controlling the
position of the channel within Wiggins Pass and to better characterize material within the Pass.
This scope of services includes the collection and analysis of additional vibracores. The locations
of the twelve (12) new vibracores were selected in consultation with FDEP representatives. A
map showing the locations of these vibracores is enclosed.
The investigation will be conducted to the geotechnical standards currently acceptable to the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc.
(CPE) will work closely with Collier County and FDEP during the field and design phases ofthe
invcstigation.
I f you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
Steph n ehn, P.E.
Senior oastal Engineer
CAe June 10, 2010
VIlI-7 New Business
3 of 10
cc: Tom Campbell, P.E., CPE
Jeff Andrews, PSM, CH, CPE
Melany Larenas, P.G., CPE
Sheri Dindial, CPE
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC
CAC June 10, 2010
VIII-7 New Business
4 of 10
SCOPE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR
WIGGINS PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT: ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
(CONTRACT NO. 09-5262)
May 26, 2010
SCOPE OF SERVICES
As part of a 2009 field investigation conducted in support of the Wiggins Pass Improvement
Project. previously compiled geotechnical data as well as newly collected vibracore and jetprobe
data was compiled and analyzed. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
requested that additional geotechnical data be collected to determine whether geology is the key
factor controlling the position of the channel within Wiggins Pass. This scope of services
includes the collection and analysis of these additional cores. Twelve (12) vibracores will bc
collected and analyzed. This scope also includes the analysis of surface grab samples to
characterize surficial sediment on the adjacent shoreline and shoals. This new data, along with
the previously assessed data, will be used to develop a geologic description of Wiggins Pass.
The fee to provide the services detailed in this proposal is not to exceed (NTE) $49,671 which
will be invoiced as time and material (T&M) as shown by thc tasks below:
Task I
Task 2
Task 3
$2,200
$40,369
$7,102
TASK I: ADMINISTRA TION/ PLANNING ($2,200)
Previously compiled geotechnical data will be re-evaluated and analyzed in a GIS (Geographical
Information System) framework in order to provide background information in addition to the
recent findings of the 2009 vibracore and jetprobe investigations. The information gathered
during Task 1 will be used to refine the vibracore plan. ePE will coordinate with the FDEP as
necessary.
Prior to conducting the tield operations a permit/de minimus exemption must be obtained. In
order to do this, a Joint Environmental Resource Permit Application (ERP) application must be
submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for review. This application
requires a general project description and a map outlining the area of deployment. The Agency
has ninety (90) days to review the permit application. The application is also forwarded to the
Bureau of Survey and Mapping, Division of State Lands for title determination. Existing
easements must be avoided during deployment or title holders must be notified of the proposed
activity. The ERP application is also forwarded to the United States Army eorps of Engineers
(USACE), Florida Division of Historical Resources (SHPO) and to Fish and Wildlife Services
(FWS) for review and comment. ePE will apply for the necessary permits. ePE will complete
and submit the required forms, as well as coordinate with the regulatory agencies.
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
CAC June 10,2010
VIII.? New Business
5 of 10
TASK 2: GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY ($40,369)
The geotechnical survey includes vibracoring to investigate potential geologic controls on the
position of the Wiggins Pass channel and to better define the sediments to be dredged. Twelve
(12) vibracores will be collected using the equipment and methods described below. A
preliminary vibracore plan is attached.
Geotechnical Survey Equipment
Vibracoring
A Rossfelder P3 Vibracore, or equivalent, configured to collect undisturbed sediment
cores up to 20 feet in length, will be used for this project. This self-contained,
freestanding electronic vibracore unit contains a vibratory hammer assembly, an
aluminum beam which acts as the vertical beam upright on the sealloor, an aluminum
coring pipe, and a cutting edge. If recovery is less than 80% of the expected total
penetration, the sampled portion of the pipe will be removed, a new core pipe attached,
and a jet pump hose will be attached just below the vibracore head. After lowering the
rig to the bottom and jetting to one (I) or two (2) feet above the refusal depth, the jet will
be turned off and the vibrator turned on in order to attempt to collect the remaining core.
At each core location a vibracore will be taken. If field measurements indicate that less
than 80% recovery has been achieved, then up to two additional cores will be taken, or a
hydraulic jetting technique will be used to facilitate sampling below previously retained
material. In the event a jet is used, the recovery of the original vibracore and additional
vibracore sections will be combined to determine total recovery. Should the above
procedures not result in 80% or more recovery, then this drilling effort will be considered
a completed core for purposes of payment under this contract.
Geotechnical Data Analysis
Sediment Sample Analysis
Upon completion of field operations, all vibracores will be transported to CPE's office in
Boca Raton, Florida. There, the vibracores will be logged by describing sedimentary
properties by layer in terms of layer thickness, color, texture (grain size), composition
and presence of clay, silt, gravel, or shells and any other identifying features. The
vibracores will be photographed in 2.0 ft intervals. Sediment samples will be extracted
from the vibracores at irregular intervals based on distinct stratigraphic layers in the
sediment sequence. The vibracores will then be wrapped and archived. Cores will be
stored for a period of up to one (1) year. After this time, cores will either be relinquished
to the client or stored for an additional annual cost of $25 per core.
Mechanical Sieve Analysis
The sediment samples (vibracore samples and grab samples) will be analyzed to
determine color and grain size distribution. During sieve analysis, any obvious
uncharacteristically large fragments (such as whole shell or large shell fragments) will be
removed and the description (weight and size) of the material will be noted. The wet, dry
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
CAC June 10,2010
VIlI-7 New Business
6 of 10
and washed Munsell colors will be noted. Sieve analysis of the sediment samples will be
performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Standard Methods Designation D 422-63 for particle size analysis of soils. This method
covers the quantitative determination of the distribution of sand size particles. For
sediment finer than the No. 230 sieve (4.0 phi) the ASTM Standard Test Method,
Designation D 1140-00 will be followed. The sieve stack used for mechanical analysis
will conform to the BBCS guidelines provided in Table I.
Table I. Mesh sizes to be used jar granularmelric analysis.
Sieve No.
3/4
5/8
7/16
5116
3'2
4
5
7
10
14
18
25
35
45
60
80
120
170
200
230
Size (phi)
-4.25
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.25
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.75
4.0
Size (mm)
19.00
16.00
11.20
8.00
5.60
4.75
4.00
2.80
2.00
1.40
1.00
0.71
0.50
0.36
0.25
0.18
0.13
0.09
0.08
0.06
Weights retained on each sieve will be recorded cumulatively. Grain size results will be
entered into the gINT@ software program, which computes the mean and median grain
size, sorting, silt/clay percentages for each sample using the moment method.
Carbonate Testing
Approximately half of the samples extracted from the vibracores will be tested for
carbonate content. Carbonate content will be determined by percent weight using the acid
leaching methodology described in Twenhofel, W.H. and Tyler, S.A., 1941. Methods of
Study of Sediments. New York: McGraw-Hili, 183p. Samples representing material
above the proposed channel cut depth will also be extracted from the cores previously
collected by CPE in 2009. These samples will also be tested for carbonate content.
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
CAG June 10,2010
VIlI-7 New Business
7 of 10
TASK 3: PRODUCT AND REPORT DEVELOPMENT ($7,102)
A tinal report summarizing the results of this vibracore investigation and discussing the geology
of Wiggins Pass will be prepared and submitted to the FDEP and Collier County. This report will
include project results, including vibracore logs, vibracore photographs, granularmetric reports
and grain size distribution curves. The report will address FDEP's RAI questions from their
March24, 2010 letter and the May 4, 2010 meeting. The report will also include tigures showing
the estimated distribution of sand, organics, clay, rock substrate and silty material suitable to
address FDEP questions and develop a dredging plan.
CPE will provide geotechnical information in an electronic format suitable for input to the FDEP
Reconnaissance Offshore Sand Search (ROSS) database as required by the FDEP. The data will
be submitted in Access or glNT tiles.
CAVEATS
CPE proposes to perform the Wiggins Pass Geotechnical Investigation to the industry standard
of care and will coordinate the investigations with FDEP as required.
In the case that a core (Section 2) does not have 80% retention, FDEP may not approve its use
for design purposes.
The client herein recognizes the above referenced risks and agrees to work with CPE to complete
the work.
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING. INC.
~ ~
l'il ~
0"
_ro
n
~~~
:;!~O
u>.
u
'Irlllrlll i ~ w
~ ~ ~ <5 ~
I ~lnlg~1 '" ~
, , , z U
~~~ Z ~ ~
J ]lll]1 ~l J 0 w
:&~ ;: w
&I,li'-!&'&, !:!. z
~:~;ilt~ 'H < 5
~ ~ '" 0" z ~
_0 w
0.... ~ci
NW 0
"'0: U' <
"'0 z. ,
<" ~ ~~ ,
::;i:i j ~i", 8
Zal 0.. ..: -~ "1
uz"1_
<;;> ;J, :ileE ~ ~
"'0 In ~!ii
;j;w .
'" ~~~;~ 0
0 u "''''''-...
..
0 e ~
0: ~
..
~
c ~
o c
;i .
.
0
- . -
-
I
~
B ~
"'
. c
r 0 .
, 0 , r
~ ~ ~ ,
"' 0 0
0 0 0 "
Z " 0 0
rl 0 0 ~
. " "
" 0
<
z
o
o
o
iii
~
o
o
o
"
o
o
,;
o
"'
z
0
~
0
3
0
"
0
U "' ~
0 "'
" 0 0 "
~ ro " 0
0 0
0 0 0 c
~ " di
" 0 ~
"
c ro ,
~ 0 " " 0
z
0 0 0 , 0
[ " . . ,
0 u r "
0 ~ 0 ~ 0
0 ~
~I rl
0 <J U . ~
0
0 ," Z
~ "0 r.:
<0
0 00 ~
z "' 0 Q;'"
~~ , ~~ 0<
wO
~[5 0 ~~ g
,> <
0, S ~~ E~
Zo Z
"'w ~. 0, 0
.0 g 00 ~
~t3 h 00
~ w". "'w 0
"
i~ 0 <l:) ;':~ 0
I ~~ ,. Z
O~ 0 _0 au "
Jg ~g 0"' 0
0 "-9; 0
:;;ii , 0' ,
~g; ~ffi o'
OX ~~ ~
00
00 X, .' ~~ ~
i;;:! ~~ Z
'X XO 0
~~ O~ ww ~
cO 0'
~~ "'" << Z
<> 0, " ~
",0 z<
3~ "> ~t:J
0, <r
0, UN Ie 0
g~~ ""
~0 ",0 ;:;:.~ j
o > ,~ .' " "6 .
'" " "' <0 ~~
"'~'; X' IZ Z
,X riX 3:C;; 0
Qcr>- <0 gtJj ~
~8~ Ow I 0
0' ZUrl 00
Gi 1- ~ ~~ "''' ", 0,
0> II
uJ'L w, <w <0
'l"~ '0 .> wC Z
~ ~ ~~ ,0 ,0 ><
, c ,0 ~~ l
o Qffi~ '0 ~::;
<l2 I
Z C?<<O 0< 00 0
N 0 , 0
-
PM """'-.""..""a'....-..,O,"S-..-'N~'". JOO..O-'~N~N31N,......W" "NIDDLM-'-'.O'OOO -."",",,,,.,,,~, ~
CAe June 10. 2010
VIII-7 New Business
9 of 10
Schedule B
Contract No: 09-5262 "County Wide Engineering Services"
Standard Hourly Rate Schedule for all disciplines
Personnel Cateqory
Principal
Standard Hourlv Rate
Senior Project Manager
$195
$165
$148
$155
$119
$85
PrOject Manager
Senior Engineer
Engineer
Senior Inspector
Inspector
$65
$140
$110
$115
Senior Planner
Planner
Senior Designer
Designer
$100
Environmental Specialist
$115
Senior GIS Specialist
$145
$100
$60
$130
$85
$130
$160
$180
GIS Specialist
Clerical
Surveyor and Mapper
CADD Technician
Survey Crew - 2 man
Survey Crew - 3 man
Survey Crew - 4 man
This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. Hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support
and other services shall be mutually negotiated by the County and firm on a project by project basis as
needed.
CAC June 10, 2010
VIlI-7 New Business
10 of 10
ASK 1: Administration/Planning
20.0
2,20
i.,;lllor
r'!dnner
?OC
110UC
22nuo(
TASK 2: Geotechnical Survey
40,36
Lallo;
SenlQr Inspector
80
80
2500
8S.00
119
6800\
PE Mob/DeMobiT ravel
Expense
Expensa
Mileage
Meals
04b
1112:
30
1080
~:~:~::__________~w____________:~~~~~__________~~_______________~_~~__________________~~:___________________-~::~~
CPE Field Work
420
3,51
1.81)01 Senlorlnspeclol 420 8500 3 570 [)
.____________~~_____________~~w______________w________________~w___________________~_____________________~__.------
ibraconng Subconsullant
18,50
Consl~lt::ln1
Consullant
10
I 8 ~)()O 0
,------------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------------------------------
Grab Sample AnalysIs
100
1,60
t,,[XlI
SerlH)f IlIspec(()r
100
8'.iOO
8500
[xoensc ~)i!jVC Anaiys,s 10 [) 7500 1500
.______________~______________________________________________________________w__________________w_________________
l.aD(J,
~)el1iol Inspector
114.0 13,66
40 0 8:)00 3.40;]()
4U U B ~j [) 0 3400()(
),1 I) 65,;0 2 }1U ()
4(\0 i500 ,CQOO
Sediment Sample Analysis
L.dUor
~>'i'li()1 rnS08ctur
Li-l()()r
!lspector
SreveAnalysls
t:::)\pon5,,'
~:~:~::___.___.____.___________:~~~~~~~~~~:~~~:____.____________________________.____~~_:__________._._____~~~~:3~
2009 Carbonate Analysis
40
1,84
Labor
Senior Inspector
Carbonate Analysis
40
200
B5.0D
3400
15000
Expense
TASK 3: Product and Report Development
66,0
7,10
L,lbor
PrOject Manager
40
1480()
LJbor
SenlOI Englnecl
20
15500
5920
3100
,2000(
40000(
L.aFJor
Lallor
I.!i:.lnqer
Designer
200
400
rlOOO
100lJ()
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-1 Old Business
1016
6/1/2010
Peer Review direction as approved by the Clam Bay Subcommittee of the Coastal
Advisory Committee at the May 20,2010 meeting.
The Coastal Advisory Committee is committed to find a workable solution with PBSD on
Peer review for the Clam Bay Estuary. Listed below are key discussion points from this
meeting.
1. PBSD refocused the scope of the effort to address only the PBS&J report dealing
primarily with data review, water quality program recommendations and data
collection issues. This is acceptable to the Clam Bay Subcommittee but should
not be the primary focus of the peer review effort The circulation modeling and
development of a master management plan for Clam Bay are the critical activities
that should be addressed. The Coastal Advisory Committee invites PBSD and
the entire community to become involved in this more critical activity when it
begins.
2. Since the scope of this peer review is focused now on Water quality and related
issues, the key criteria in selecting a review resource should be someone with
intimate knowledge of state water quality standards, the Impaired Water Rule,
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL's) and the impacts/standards for Dissolved
Oxygen and Chlorophyll. This is the basis for all the conclusions and
recommendations associated with Water Quality and the Water Sampling
program. This criterion was omitted from the PBSD selection criteria and should
be used as the primary qualifications in selecting a reviewer.
3. FDEP is the agency that is tasked with the Water quality management of the
estuaries within the state. FDEP could evaluate this report and determine if the
conclusions are valid and if the report was prepared in a professional manner.
The Clam Bay Subcommittee of the CAC was not supportive of this option at this
time.
4. Resources that the CAC believe are qualified to perform the Peer Review were
left off of the list proposed by PBSD. In speaking with Keith Dallas, PBSD
Chairman, it was not their intention to sensor or eliminate any CAC
recommendations at this time.
The key focus of our peer review should be the circulation modeling, analysis and
recommendations moving forward. Care should be taken that the peer review of the
water quality study performed by PBS&J does not sap the strength out of this future
effort. With that in mind, The Clam Bay subcommittee of the CAC approved:
1. The list of consultants proposed by PBS&J. CZM staff will add to them our list
(previously identified and others) and forward them to purchasing for proposal
solicitation.
2. The modified PBSD scope of work as identified in the "Explanation of Changes
from the 3/19/10 Draft" document Added back in will be the stipulation that
water quality expertise will be the primary qualification in selecting a peer review
professional for this portion of work. Peer review for other portions of work will
be evaluated and selected separately.
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-1 Old Business
20f6
3. Keith Dallas and Gary McAlpin to work together to develop the request for
proposal document with purchasing Once the consultant list is prepared it will
be the only individuals that can submit proposals.
4. Keith Dallas and Gary McAlpin collaborate on a proposal evaluation document
that can be brought back and reviewed by our respective boards by next
meeting.
5. Agree to target to have this activity complete and a proposal on the street by
6/15
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-1 Old Business
3 of 6
Clam Bay Estuary
Peer Review Scope of Work
March 15, 2010
March 19,2010 - Rev. 1
Backaround
During their regular December 15,2009 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners
approved an independent peer review of the work required to complete the
development of a comprehensive management plan for the Clam Bay Estuary.
Specifically, that an independent peer review, of the Clam Bay Water
Circulation/Flushing Modeling Program and the Clam Bay System Data Collection
Analysis Report recently completed by PBS&J be performed by a recognized expert.
This expert, jointly selected by Pelican Bay Services Division and Coastal Zone
Management, will be from an academic/university background and not directly involved
with any consulting firm The review of the Clam Bay Data Collection and Analysis
Report is proposed to be conducted early in the development of the flushing/circulation
model. It is also recommended that the cost of this effort and any future phased peer
review be split between the Pelican Bay Services Division and Coastal Zone
Management
Consideration
Development of a management plan for Clam Bay will involve a number of critical
sciences not usually resident in one individual expert. Among others, these disciplines
would involve water quality, coastal engineering, marine biology, modeling, geology and
coastal management to name just a few. In addition, they must be knowledgeable with
state rules and regulations to be successful. This must include involvement in issues
related to FDEP's existing state water quality standards, the use of the Impaired Waters
Rule (IWR), and experience with the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) program.
These three issues - state water quality standards, the IWR, and the TMDL program -
are absolutely critical. Familiarity with all three and the implications of such are the
most important issue here If they don't know about those three programs - then
they're probably not right for the peer review process. Also critical to the success of this
review would be a track record in managing estuaries of a similar nature in Southwest
Florida and no prior history of involvement with our community.
Consultants have been ruled out due to the competitive nature of the consulting
business.
Stand alone academics although initially recommended, lack the array of technical
expertise required along with the practical track record of managing estuaries in SW
Florida. For these reasons, we have reconsidered this requirement
CAC June 10, 2010
IX~1 Old Business
40f6
There are three national estuary programs in SW Florida that have the technical and
practical expertise to evaluate our program, guide us and make recommendations.
These programs are
. Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program run by Judy Ott
. Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program run by Dr Jay Leverone
. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Run by Ed Sherwood
Each of these programs is separate and distinct from each other. They are EPA
sponsored and have developed the science necessary to develop their estuary
programs. They are not associated with Collier County and are usually funded by a
combination of USEPA, FDEP, local Government and the WMD. Each of these
programs has also developed biological, water and overall estuary health diagnostic
studies in the management of their estuary.
The added benefit of working with one of these programs is that only expenses, no fees
or certainly reduced fees might be possible.
In researching this topic two other individuals were highly recommended. They are:
. Dr Ernie Estevez a Estuarine Ecologists with Mott Marine and
. Dr. Loren Coen, the Executive Director of Sanibel-Captiva Conservation
Foundation
Both this individuals do not run estuaries but have extensive experience in conservation
issues within the SW Florida environment. Unfortunately, Dr. Estevez has elected not to
participate with us because of the political dynamics involved.
Considerable concern was expressed at the last Clam Bay subcommittee meeting held
on 3/17/2010 by the Pelican Bay community if these programs and individuals have had
an acquaintance and working relationship with Dr. Dave Tomasko and/or PBS&J. The
Pelican Bay community is concerned that as a result of any relationship, objectively
would be compromised. I can only indicate that since these are all nationally
recognized programs and Dr. Tomasko is a nationally recognized expert, both are
known to each other. Since we want the highest degree of expertise available, I can
assure you that this will probably be the case with any experts that are selected. Since
the PBSD will jointly select the peer review resources, I would expect that this would be
discussed and resolved during the interview process.
Activities to be performed durin!! the Peer Review Process
Two items were specifically identified to be performed during peer review. They are:
1. Review, analysis and critique of the Data Collection and Analysis report dated
October 2009 performed by PBS&J.
2. Review, analysis and critique of the water circulation/flushing modeling program
to be performed by PBS&J.
Additionally, the selected is peer review individual/firm may be used to review and
critique the development of the management plan f jointly agreed to by all parties
concerned.
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-1 Old Business
50f6
Recommendation
Staff and the Clam Bay subcommittee of the CAC are recommending that these
individual along with those presented by the Pelican Bay Services Division be given the
opportunity to submit credentials in response to a solicitation by the Collier County
purchasing department. Only pre-identified candidates will be allowed to submit
proposals for evaluation. Proposals will be jointly evaluated and must be acceptable to
Collier County Coastal Zone Management ICAC and the Pelican Bay Services Division.
CAC June 10, 2010
IX~1 Old Business
60f6
e.~~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Pelican Ba) Services DivisiOIl
so 1 L;llIrl'1 (),1"- I hi \l' . 'ulll' ()l!'i . ~dple". I'll )J](lii ."\.j I us . i ~y); :;tJ"' \ ';~q . f';i\ ; 2,Q) )')7 '.+-"lI2
June 8, 2010
Gary McAlpin, Director
Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
I< E: Clam Bay Estuary Peer ReView Scope oj Work
Dear Mr McAlpm
This letter is in response to your email regardmg the Clam Bay Estuary Peer I<eview Scope of Work, dated
June 2, 2010. The Pelican Bay Servire Division appreciates the work the Coastal Advisory Committee has
done to date and is also committed to find a workable solution with CAC on the Peer Review of the Clam Bay
System Data Collection aod Analysis Final Report completed October 2009 by PBS&J and its associated
historical data
This response is formatted to respond to the live speone items delineated in your June 2 response:
1, We agree that PBSD and CZM will each individually recommend lists of potential consultants to be
forwarded to Purchasing tiJr proposal solicitation. It IS agreed that only Individuals on such
consultant list produced by Purchasing can submit proposals,
2 The PBSD suggests that to properly review the final PBS&1 report and associated hlStoncal data in its
entirety; the reviewer must have hroader knowledge than just water quality expertise. Therefore, we
recommend our earlier language of "water quality, marine biology, modeling/hydrology. geology,
and natural estuary/ecosystems'. remain in the Scope of Work.
3. In an effort to maximize the coordination between the PBS!) and CAC and to move this project along
as quickly as is feasible, we propose that a joint committee of the chairmen of the PBS!) and Clam Bay
Subcommittee of the CAC along with our respective administrators (Messrs Pires, McAlpin, Dallas
and Dorrill) work together with Purchasing to develop the request for proposal document.
4. We also recommend that the 4 individuals above collaborate on a proposal evalnation method that
can he brought back and reviewed by 0111' I.espeerive boards at the earliest possible date.
5. Unfortunately because the response from CZM was only receIVed the day before our last PBS!)
meeting (and due to County email problems, first seen by some Board members at the actual
meehng), the June 15th deadline is not feasible, However. we do wish to see this process wrapped up
as quickly as is practical.
I wish to thank CAC anel you for your efforts, We look forward to slIccessflllly completing thIS project aod
diSCUSSing future projects.
1
t<,{'lth i D~lll;:ls, Lhairmdil
Pelican Bay Services Division Board
~.
c:::.: " f.. f . ~
_..~~0.~_....__0_-. ......-...."'._...,
C',
Florida Fish
and Wildlife
Conservation
Commission
Commissioners
Rodney Barreto
Cnair
Miami
Richard A. Corbett
Vice Chair
Tampa
Kathy Barco
Jacksonville
Ronald M. Bergeron
Fort Lauderdale
Dwight Stephenson
De/ray Beach
Kenneth W. Wright
Winter Park
Brian S. Yablonski
Tallahassee
EkEtCutlve Staff
Nick Wiley
Executive Director
Greg Holder
Assistant Executive Director
Karen Ventimiglia
Deputy Chief of Staff
Division of
Law Enforcement
Colonel Jim Brown
Director
(850)481>6251
(850)921-6453 FAX
Managing fish and wildlife
resources for their long.term
well.being and the benefit
of people.
620 South Meridian Street
Tallahassee, Florida
32399-1600
Voice: (850) 488-4676
Hearin~speech impaired:
(800) 955-8771 (T)
(800)955-8770 (V)
MyFWC.com
CAe June 10, 2010
IX-2 Old Business
1 of 8
May 21, 2010
Pamela Keyes, Environmental Specialist
Collier County
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34113
RE: Infonnation Markers Clam PasslBay - Pennit 09-021 - CoUier County
Dear Ms. Keyes:
We are in receipt of your Florida Uniform Waterway Application requesting permission
to install nine (9) information markers within Clam Pass. Your application was received
by the Boating and Waterway Management Section on April 26, 2010. Based upon the
information provided, your request for nine (9) information markers to be posted in Clam
Pass is approved and subject to the following conditions:
1. Permit number 09-021 is contingent upon the consent of, and if necessary, the
issuance of appropriate permits from the United States Coast Guard (USCG) and the
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) authorizing the placement of structures for support
of the uniform waterway markers.
2. This permit requires Collier County to place nine (9) Uniform Waterway markers
exactly as indicated on the attached marker list. Each marker(s) shall be consistent with
the Florida Uniform Waterway Marking System format. Permit number 09-021 must be
displayed on the marker in black block characters measuring at least one (I") inch in
height. (Graphic Included)
3. Placement of markers associated with permit number 09-021 must be as requested in
the application submitted to our office by Collier County. Any deviation in the
placement of markers will require Collier County to apply to have the permit amended to
reflect any change in the placement of markers. Collier County must adhere to all of the
conditions specified in rule 68D-23.106, Florida Administrative Code, a copy of which is
enclosed with this permit letter.
4. All uniform waterway markers authorized under this permit must be maintained in
proper condition at all times. Collier County must immediately report and correct any
discrepancies of any marker to this office by calling (850) 488-5600 or by facsimile at
(850) 488-9284.
5. Permit number 09-021 does not authorize the invasion of private rights, nor grant any
exclusive privileges. nor does it obviate the necessity of complying with any other state.
federal, or local laws and regulations
6. By accepting permit number 09-021 and placement of the uniform waterway markers,
Collier County does hereby, to the extent authorized by law, agree and promise to hold
harmless the State of Florida, its employees, agents or successors, from fault with respect
to any claim or claims arising from alleged negligence in the placement, maintenance,
operation, and removal of any and all markers placed by Collier County pursuant to this
permit. Collier County agrees to indemnify the State of Florida for all legal fees and
costs incurred in defense of any suit brought against the State because of alleged
Ms. Keyes
Page 2
May 21, 2010
CAe June 10, 2010
IX-2 Old Business
2 of 8
negligence by Collier County in the placement, maintenance, operation, or removal of the
uniform waterway markers. (nongovernmental applicants only)
7. Violation of any provision of this permit shall result in the revocation of the
authorization to place uniform waterway markers in, on, or above waters of this state.
8. Pursuant to Section 68D-23.IIO, Florida Administrative Code, (Inspections and
Certifications); Collier County is required to inspect all markers triennially and maintain
inspection documentation. Failure to inspect and maintain documentation of the results
of a marker inspection is grounds for rescinding this permit. FWC mav reQuest a copy of
the inspection documentation in May 2013.
If you have any questions. please call at 850-410-0656, extension 17376 or
rvan.moreau @mvfwC' .c~)tn.
Sincerely,
~~
Mr. Ryan Moreau, Planner
Boating and Waterways Section
Division of Law Enforcement
Inn
Enclosures:
cc:
68D-23.IIO, FAC
68D-23.106, FAC
Graphic
Marker List
Robert Diffenderfer, P.A.
Lucy Blair, DEP
Tim Rach, DEP
Joe Embres, USCG
R Y AN201 O/COLLIERJCLAMPASS2.DOC
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-2 Old Business
3 of 8
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-2 Old Business
4 of 8
RULE NO: RULE TITLE
680-23.106: Permit Conditions
(1) All markers must comply with the following requirements and all permits issued pursuant to this
chapter are subject to the following conditions:
(a) Placement of these markers must be as requested in the application. Any deviation will require that the
applicant apply to have the pennit amended.
(b) The applicant must display the permit number (except as provided below) on each marker and the
ordinance number, code section number, statute number, regulation or rule number (etc.) on each
regulatory marker. These numbers must be displayed in black, block characters approximately one inch in
height.
I. On all regulatory markers, the permit number must be displayed in the lower left corner on the face of
eacb regulaton' .mark.er. The ordinance number, code section number, statute number, regulation or rule
number (etc.) must be displayed in the lower right comer on the face of each regulatory marker.
2. On all markers other than regulatory markers, the permit number must be displayed on the marker at any
location on the marker where it can easily be read, including the reverse side of a sign, provided that it does
not interfere with the message of the marker.
3. Informational markers placed by counties, municipalities, or other governmental entities on inland lakes
and their associated canals are exempt from permitting under this rule. Such markers, if not permitted. must
display in lieu ofa permit number, the name of the county, municipality, or other governmental entity that
placed the marker.
(c) Upon completion of the installation of markers, the applicant must notify the Boating and Waterways
Section in Miting within 30 days. If the latitude and longitude oreach marker, as installed, is different from
that listed in the application, this notification must include the correct latitude and longitude in degrees and
decimal minutes as installed and the datum in which the coordinates are expressed.
(d) All markers must be maintained in proper condition at all times. A discrepancy exists whenever a
marker is not exactly as described in the approved application or is destroyed, damaged, moved, or is
othenvise unserviceable or not watching properly. The applicant must immediately report any discrepancy
in the marker to the Boating and Waterways Section by telephone, telefacsimile or other similarly rapid
means of communication. Unless the applicant's permit expressly provides for a longer period, the
applicant must correct any discrepancy within not more than 30 days and must notify the Boating and
Waterways Section when the correction is accomplished.
(e) Authorization by the division for the placement ofa marker does not authorize any invasion of private
rights, nor grant any exclusive privileges, nor does it obviate the necessity of complying with any other
federal, state or local laws or regulations.
(f) All permits issued pursuant to this chapter are contingent upon the consent of and, if necessary, the
issuance of appropriate permits by the United States Anny Corps of Engineers authorizing the placement of
structures for the support of the proposed markers. Consent may be by nationwide permit, regional permit,
letter permit, authorization letter, statement of no objection, or other similar means.
(g) All permits issued pursuant to this chapter are contingent upon the consent of and, if necessary, the
issuance of appropriate permits by the United States Coast Guard authorizing the establishment of private
aids to navigation pursuant to Part 66 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(h) It is unlawful to place markers, buoys, or signs on submerged lands, or other property or structure not
CAC June 10. 2010
IX-2 Old Business
5 of 8
owned by the person or governmental entity placing them without first receiving the written consent of the
owner of the submerged lands, other property, or structure to the placement of said markers, buoys, or
signs. For markers, buoys, or signs placed pursuant to a permit issued under this rule, the permit is
contingent upon the applicant providing a copy of such consent to the Boating and Waterways Section.
(i) By accepting any permit and placing the markers authorized therein, the applicant other than a
governmental entity, to the extent authorized by law, agrees and promises to hold harmless the State of
Florida and its agencies, employees, agents, or successors from fault with respect to any claim or claims
arising from alleged negligence in the placement, maintenance, operation and removal ofaoy and all
markers placed by applicants pursuant to such permits. The applicant other than a governmental entity
further agrees to indemnify the State of Florida for any and all legal fees and costs incurred in defense of
any suit brought against the State as a result of alleged negligence by applicant in the placement,
maintenance, operation or removal of the markers.
(j) Applicants for permits to place regulatory markers or the governmental entities establishing the rules,
ordinances, or other actions imposing the regulations must provide for the enforcement of operating
restrictions noticed by said markers.
(2) Additional conditions for regulatory markers.
(a) All regulatory markers must be supported by a statute, special act, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, or
other similar regulatory instrument which imposes the restriction displayed on the marker.
(b) If the regulatory instrument supporting a regulatory marker is amended or ifit is repealed, rescinded,
revoked, or otherwise becomes a nullity, the permit holder must within 30 days notify the Boating and
Waterways Section of the change and must also:
1. In the case of an amendment to the regulatory instrument, the file and amended permit application
showing the markers that will be removed, replaced, modified, or added in order to implement the
amendment to the regulatory instrument.
2. In the case of the repeal, rescission, revocation, or other nullification of the regulatory instrument,
remove from the waters of this state and the shores thereof all regulatory markers implementing that
regulatory instrument.
(3) The division and its officers and all other law enforcement officers charged with the
enforcement of Chapter 327, F.S., have the authority to remove or cause the removal of
any marker found in violation ofthe conditions imposed under this section or otherwise
imposed in the permit authorizing the placement of the marker if the violation is not
corrected within 30 days following notification of the permittee of the violation.
History Notes: Specific Authority 327.04,327.40,327.41 FS. Law Implemented 327.40, 327.41 FS.
llistory-New 12-23-01, Amended 10-5-06.
CAC June 10, 2010
IX-2 Old Business
6 of 8
68D-23.110 In.pedlon. and Certillcation.
(1) Each person holding a permit to place and maintain one or more markers must inspect all markers for which the permit was
issued triennially.
(2) The required inspection must be documented in writing and must include the following:
(a) The name ofthe permit holder and pennit number of the markers heing inspected;
(b) The name of the person or persons currently responsible for the placement and maintenance of the markers; and
(c) A photograph of each marker taken in close enough proximity to legibly show all symbols, borders, and letters and numbers,
including the text of any message, the permit number, and the ordinance number, code section number, statute number, regulation or
rule number, (etc.). For marker installations with two or more signs, a sufficient number of photographs must be taken to legibly
show the information on each sign. Digital photography is acceptable for this purpose. Photographs must be labeled with the
location of the marker depicted and the date the photograph was taken.
(d) A statement certifying that the markers placed pursuant to the permit have been inspected during the ninety days preceding
the statement and that:
1. The markers are properly maintained and in serviceable condition;
2. The markers cd'nfonn to the requirements of this chapter;
3. The markers are still properly on station; and
4. The date or dates on which the markers were inspected.
(3) The permit holder must maintain the inspection documentation until it is replaced by a subsequent inspection and
documentation. Failure to inspect a marker and to maintain documentation of the results of the inspection during the specified time
period is grounds for rescinding the pennit authorizing placement of the marker and for removing or ordering the removal of the
marker.
(4) Dayboard and buoy surfaces and dayboard backing materials will deteriorate because of the effects of weathering. Wind,
rain, freezing temperatures, and sunlight cause delamination (separation), cracking, peeling, and fading. Attention must be given to
these conditions during inspections.
(a) Markers will be considered discrepant under the following guidelines:
1. Backing materials. Delamination of the plies on a plywood dayboard backing must not effect mOTe than 25 percent of the
surface area. Any warpage must not visibly detract from the signal or message presented to the mariner. The backing must not be
softened or otherwise deteriorated around the mounting points to a degree that the board could come loose in a storm typical for the
area in which the marker is placed.
2. Elastomeric films, numerals, letters, symbols, and borders, Delamination of films and retroreflective markings on dayboards
and buoys must not affect more than 10 percent of the surface of the material. Films and retroreflective markings must not be
cracked, checked, weathered, or abraded so as to have a dull or roughened surface. Peeling of the film or markings from the
dayboard or buoy must not affect more than 10 percent of the surface area. Letters, numerals, symbols, and borders must not be
faded or weathered so as to visibly detract from the signal or message presented to the mariner.
(b) A dayboard or buoy must be replaced if any of the deteriorations noted above is observed or, if for any reason, it cannot
function as intended (including significant fading or other discoloration) until the next regularly scheduled inspection, Onsite repairs
are permitted if they do not interfere with or detract from the intended signal function of the marker.
(5) All discrepancies documented during an inspection must be reported to the Boating and WatelWays Section and corrected
within 30 days. as provided in paragraph 680-23.106(1 led). P.A.C.
Specific Authority 327.04,327.40,327.41 FS. Law Implemented 327.40,327.41,370.12 FS Histury-New 12-23-01, Amended 10-5-06.
'"
4-<
o
0-
~t
o~
~ ,
WOJ
532
-0",
()N_
<( '0
O~r--
c;,
"E
o
~
~
t)
0)
'0'
il::
....
.@
"
:;
>>
"
~
OJ
~
c
o
.-
VI
.! c
o
EOl
E3
O!E...
.. c:
n" 0)
-> E:
C:J~
0""
._ Q r:::
.... tl ~
Ill"",
~._.,
QI,n
VI .. J!l
C ,,~
Oto1l
V:Ec
CU >~
.... ",.,
= E V)
~ ,,01
_....5:
._ raw
~ ~S
_"" ~ 'a
uu .e Q.l
..c ';: iE
VI:lo
.- ..
u.'I:l
III '~
~it
.-
...
o
ii:
o
....
o
N
.....
....
N
U1
Cl
w
>
o
""
0.
0.
<
o in
~ i!
2 a
....
o
z
;;
"
l;:
'i
>
~
"
i!
..
z
~
w w
=> '"
Z '"
W ....N
::> 10M
< V'l.O
W OMl.O
l/') .-I"l:t,
w~ v;2.M
>-<( M.....-l~
W:r: -IV_
::W:::u u..~?""I..
<[X"'vi..~E
....JUJwwtJ_o
w... f- ....I c: .. ..
~CQ_a.OllCC
<(LI"l::;)<CC,,=
a.M(/)ZD.U.(I)
;;
"
S::
'E
...
"
I/)
"
..
..
c
fJ)
fJ)
<
0.
):'
<
'"
::;:
s
u
;;
E
..
z
i~
'_X >-
Ow Z l-
et ~ ::... z
IL- ~ =>
.-10 ftI -I 0
~u. !~U
~~ s9ffi
.: ..fJ)j~3
o-;~_~o
Z_o."ou
cu >-.....u....
1G>-1Il ...
~EO'i~iS~ti
v,,::;:l:!Ui:l;!J!
v..<["..~c:
;t1l.J..raa.o
Ii:~u.svocv
~
W W
=> '"
Z '"
W ....N
> 10M
<( V'\D
W 0('1")""
.......,
~ v~M
><~c:( M.-I:2;
W<:I: -lV_
V'lt-U u..~~..
lJ'l:...JxaJl/l""O"lE
w::>www"_o
W~VI:;...Jc..fJ
gO~:J~fO=s
UUMVlZ u..U)
z
3=
o
z
'"
Z
:::J
2i
c:
..
c:
!
c:
.;
z
..
~
"
25
'Vi
c:
o
~
..
&
c:
~
l
!
..
c
.
"
~
Ai
..
c
*
III
..
,
III
Cl\
'*
"
..
c:
..
c:
'6
..
o
z
W
J:
3=
Cl
W
Cl
Cl
<
fJ)
<
:;:
z
o
~
::;:
""
o
IL-
is
i:n
fJ)
<
0.
):'
<
'"
::;:
s
,.,
.. w
f ~
oc vi
'I:l ""
tl ~
'1: ""
~ ~
"z W
c; C ~
~.~ z<5
tV ..0:::
o'E ~o
III E lli IL-
'" 0 C fJ)
~ ~>->-;~
~ 0.::..,::..0.....
i.:.:I~8...:e~ ,
......1/)0,,""'"
:lJe i:llt~i\!8
1Il-='" N
g c"f.....O'<iz
:e<8 ~ ~EiS""_
<J!l.!IlJ"~~c:i
ffiE'~E''6~'&E~~
::Ic:is;~c:liwJ:
...JGI ~Uu.ll;:r:l-
OE ....-f->-
we .IO~*a:a
.. ~ e: '5 .... VI W .. 0
Ui''' ~"'.- J! e-...o J!l W
~o Uol/)O c:t:;
t'1lJ "'S!va~<
n~,i.t! U ES.
00 ",c:.._oo
V.J ...:lOCU.VU
fJ)
fJ)
<
>of!:.
..~
EIO
!::;:
..s
~u
fJ)
'"
I.lJ
::;:
::;:
~
fJ)
Cl
z
<
fJ)
""
W
!;;:
o
'"
""
~
f-
=>
o
'"
o
g
a.
W
W
'"
Cl
W
""
5
CY
w
""
W
\.9
Cl
W
....I
3=
o
z
'"
3=V\;;!
"'wu
,,"0.
"OgJ~g
". Z
:t!~::lo
'" <....
c:.... f-
O"',=>
.Jo~L5
Z>= ;;
""'<01
....::;:..>
'ON~,_;:>
i!..-io-f....l
:iJT""iU.II~
.."'z>....
.IN....
..C:t:
" '" 5:
Vt... :fin UJ
..." ,- - Cl
cu> -e"w
~:g-Lt')" ~\.9
...... ~>.- <
.. ..... '" c::t! '"
." 1..-10)" UJ
.... ......_"0 >
. 1""'4 U'pC <(
:&
EO
>oIL-
I/)~
c:
i~
.- Q)
C:;:
"w
'I:l....l
0-
vo.
..W
c:....I
,,\.9
OZ
zti'i
c:
o
;i,-
~~
fJ)
fJ)
<(
0.
.....
"tli
......I
.- z
1/)....
o
-
o
'"
-
-
C:!
If'\
""
c;,
~
-
~
i
~
"
00
8
1J
~
e
~
~
0)
OJ
~
Ul
"
C
oj
~
;3
c;,
u
,f
oJ
"
~
~
.c
'" 0
4-< -
00 0
0<'&1 ~
~. -
~
wil'l V)
S:2
-0", fJ) fJ) fJ) fJ) fJ) fJ) fJ) fJ)
()N- Vl fJ) Vl fJ) ~ fJ) ~ fJ)
<( '0 < < < < rf. rf.
U~c:o 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
..... Vl ):' fJ) ..... fJ) ~ fJ) ..... ~ ~ .....
:;: a: a: >- a: ~ :;: :;:
w < w < w UJ
10 ~ lO ::;: lO ~ '" ~ lO '" '" lO
::;: ::;: ~ ~ ~ ::;: ::;: ::;: ::;: ::;: ::;: ::;:
:5 .... :5 .... :5 .... :5 3: :5 :5 :5 :5
3= :;: 3=
U Vl U fJ) U Vl U fJ) U U U U
Cl 0 Cl Cl
Z Z Z z
12 < 0 < 0 < 0 < 12 12 0 0
fJ) ... fJ) ... ~ ... fJ) ... ...
is a: is a: is is a: is is z is
w w w w ....
~ ~ ~ ~ , 1;1 ~ 1;1 ~
ill 0 0 0 V> V>
'" 10 '" 0) '" '" "
~ " " ~
a: a: ID a: .c: a: .c: .c: .c: .c:
1;1 0 ~ 12 0 ~ 0 ~ 1: 1: 1:
V> ;:J ;:J
'" ... .. ... 0 ... 0 0 0 0
UJ f- w f- 3= f- fJ) f- fJ) fJ) Z Z Z
w :> ~ :> w :> w :> ~ a: w UJ w
..... 0 0 ..... 0 ..... 0 UJ ...J ..... ...J
.... '" EL '" .... '" .... '" EL ::;: ! EL EL EL
0. 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 ::;:
~ 9 ~ 9 ~ 0 ~ 9 w 3: UJ w w
..... ..... ..... ..... .....
<.:l <.:l <.:l <.:l <.:l <.:l <.:l <.:l
z 0. Z 0. Z 0. Z 0. Z Vl Z Vl Z Vl Z fJ)
Vi UJ .... W .... UJ Vi UJ Vi 0 Vi a: Vi a: Vi a:
UJ Vl w Vl UJ , W W W W ,
'" '" '" '" z ::;: ::;: ::;: ..
< ::;: ::;: ::;: ..
Cl Cl Cl Cl "
w w W UJ V) .... .... 3: ,-
~ a: ~ r:< ~ r:< ~ r:< r:< 3= :;: 0
~ .... " s ~ .... " s ~ w ~ Vl ~ Vl ~ fJ) ...
:::J ~ :> ~ 0 ~ 0 Cl 0 0 0 Cl ~
'" CY '" CY '" CY '" CY .c: .c: .c: .c:
3= w :;: w 3= w :;: w Vl 0 fJ) z fJ) z fJ) z ..
a: a: a: a: lO < < < :c
fJ) w fJ) UJ fJ) W Vl W fJ) ~ fJ) fJ) fJ) Vl fJ) fJ) f-
~ <.:l fJ) <.:l fJ) (,!) fJ) (,!) ~ 0 fJ) a: fJ) a: ~ a: Co
w w w
Cl rf. Cl rf. Cl rf. Cl ... rf. ~ < ~ ~ " 0-
0. W W ~ W f- 0. 0. :E c;,
@ ..... 8 ..... ... 8 ..... 8 :> 8 @ @ ~
3= 3= ti:i 3= 3= I 0 0
0 lO lO lO -
0 ..... 0 ..... 0 ..... 0 ..... '" ..... , 1::
~ z is z z z is z z 0 is a: I ~ a: is r:< 8-
'" '" .... '" '" .... 9 0 0 0
... ... ... "
3=fJ);;! 3=Vl;;! 3=Vl;;! 3=fJ)6 , :;:fJ)0. :;:fJ)f- 3=Vlf- :;:Vlf- E
"'UJU "'UJU "'wu "'w "'WUJ "'w:> ....w:> ....w:>
"0.0 "'0.0 "'0.0 "0.0 Lflo.UJ Lflo.o "'0.0 "'''-0 ~
g;~..... g:~..... g:~..... ~~..... :g~", Lfl~", I "~'" ~~'"
~ 0 ~ 0
a\-1Z OO..JZ OO....JZ cO-IZ a\-1Z "''''''0 "''''''0 a\..Jo 00
",.....0 ........0 ........0 ........0 ........0 ............. ",.......... V....Jg 8
"""'<~ ....-4<i== ~<(~ i """'c%;~ _o:(~ ....<0. , ....<0. ....<0. '"
'" , :> '" ,:> '" , :> "":> '" , :> ""w O)'w ""w ....
oi5<5 Oz< oz<5 oi5<5 Oz< ozw Ozw Ozw "
zOU z9.. OU 0'" 0'" 0'" ~
z........ """'f:iai z_.. z_.. z_.. z""" z"'" ..
oot;{" ....f-" Nf-" ~!;(GJ I.O~IU N!;(W N!;;(I>> 8
....~ '" 0< '" 0< '" " < '" ,,~: r-..~ ~ ....~ : ....::;: '" ~
"'::;:"3= "'::;:"3= ::;:"3=
-E N r:<'!! 3= N 0::.'- N 0::.'- \0 ex: .- .-l CX:'- ..-4 eX:'- N 0::.'- NIX'!!
MOJ)....J MOJ:t...J rriO-e~ NO,c...J MOi! MO-e MO-e MO-e ~
0 ....LL..~~ .-lu..i~ ......." .-lu..~~ ........ ........ ......." ........ .':l
~ \.02>;'" 1.02>;'" 1.02>;'" \.02>;'" ",Z> ",Z> "'Z> "'Z> ..
~ N.... N.... N.... N.... "'.... "'.... N.... "'- ~
lOCI .. C I .. C I ..C::r: .. c: .. c: .. c: .. c:
- " "'Ii: " "'f- . "'>- " "'Ii: .'" .'" .'" "'"
U ",.- 11:I'- a.. en'- Q. ",.- ",.- ",.- ",.- ",.- c;,
0) "IIlW "lIlw "lIlw ..lIlw "Ill "Ill I "Ill ..Ill '"
'5' .- - Cl .- - 0 --0 :EiiO :Eii :eii :eii ! :iiii I;::
-e" -e"UJ -e"W
il:: I.DlUa~ "GJg~ ",.g(,!) O\ig~ oig ...-IlUg NilS Mig ~
~ '" >.- ~ '" >.- ~ '" >.- ~ "'>.- ~ I tt>:e:; ~>:ti ~>;; r;t>.. ~
" .. " .. " .. b;c:t:: c;,
O'IC=6w 0'1 C'- 0'1 C'- 0\ C'- Ol C'- 0\ C .- 0'\ C'-
.... en "g UJ .....cn"UJ ...-l ca"O w .... ",'1:1 .... ",'1:1 .... ",'1:1 .... ",'1:1 U
.... "''1:1 -.-" > -.-" > _._"a> -'- " .....i7i'l:l _._~ ....._'1:1 .t
-'- oC >
:; NIIl < Mv.oC< vcnC< LncnC<c "'Ill 0( " 0( "'Ill ",Ill 0(
>> ~
"
~
" :::::
1'J ~
~ .t::