Ordinance 90-0111 o~O~NANCE 9o-~
· . ,-.~, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE
~ ~ .~:- NO. 89-05, THE "COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
· I ~_ :* !* MANAGEMENT PLAN", FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA
:* : - OF COLLIER COUNTY BY AMENDING THE FUTURE ~%ND '~'~
,. -- ': * USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS;'/BY
~i ~ AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP LEGEND; BY
u_ ":-L AMENDING THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT, "
'] '* ' EXISTING CONDITIONS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS . .
: ~' MAPS, AND TABLES, BY AMENDING RECREATION AND'
OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, EXISTING AND FUTURE "~ "
CONDITIONS MAPS FROM PLANNING COMMUNITIES T0."
IMPACT FEE DISTRICTS; BY PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County adopted the Collier County Growth Managemen't*Plan on
WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Section 163.3184 also
known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and .Land
Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Chapter 9J-11, Procedure
Rule for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and
Amendments provides for a process to amend a Comprehensive Plan
(Growth Management Plan) adopted pursuant to Chapter 163, .~art II,
Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has held public hearings to
provide for and encourage public participation throughout th~*.
· amendment process; and
~' ': WHEREAS, Collier County did submit the Growth Management
i. Plan Amendments to the State Land Planning Agency for preliminary
~ review on August 18, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the State Land Planning Agency did review and
: make written objections to certain sections of the proposed
~: Amendments and transmitted the same in writing to Collier County
within the time provided by law; and
,~ WHEREAS, Collier County has sixty days from receipt of
the'~ritten objections from the State Land Planning Agency to
adopt or adopt with changes the prop6~ed amendments to the Growth
i Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission in a
manner prescribed by law did hold a public hearing concerning the
adoption of the amendments to the Growth Management Plan on
January 18, 1990 and recommended their adoption by the Board of
County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did take
action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public
hearing on January 30, 1990; and
WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural
requirements of law have been met; and
WHEREAS, the State Land Planning..Agency, within
forty-five days of receipt of Collier County's Amendments to its
Growth Management Plan, must review and determine if the plan is
in compliance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
Land Development Regulation Act of 1985.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BO;tRD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
$~CTION ONE:
This Ordinance as described herein, shall_be known as
the 1989 Growth Management Plan'Amendments for Collier County, 'o
Florida. The Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment-~
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference consist of
amendments to Future Land Use Designations, the Future Land Use
Map Legend Designations and their depiction on the Map; Traffic
Circulation Existing Conditions and Future Conditions Maps, and
Tables; and Recreation and Open Space Element Maps depicting
Existing and Future Conditions on Impact Fee District Maps.
If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
Jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct
and independent provision and such h'~lding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion.
notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been
filed with the Secretary of State.
DATED: O
;~TTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION, ERS
l~gal sufficiency:
Marjor~e M. Student
~ 1. URBAN R£SIDE~XAL SUBDISTRICT
The purpose o£ chis subdistrict is Co provide for higher
densities ~n an area with relatEvely few natural resource
constreints and where existing and planned public
are concentrated.
Subdistrict shall be determined through a Density Rating
System. Water-dependent and water-related'land uses shall be
encouraged w£chin the coastal region of th£s. subdistricC.
2. 1JI~AN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE SUBDIS~~
~e purpose o[ thi~ ~ubdtsttic: la ~o provide :ran~itional
densities be:ween the U~ban Deal&hated Area and :he
Agricultural~ural Area. Re~tdant~al lend u~a~ may ~e
a~ a eaxim~ density of 1.5 unita per gro~a acre aub~ec~ to the
followin& condi:lons:
a. All rezones muaC be in the fo~ of a ~lanne~ Unl~ Develop-
memo; and
': b. Proposed development in the area shall be fully respo~i-
~'. ble for all necessa~vaCe: ~na~emenc improvements,
.{ including the routing o~ all on-site and appropriate o~-
" site water through the project's water management system,
,~ and a fair share cost of necessa~ improgemencs to
~' 951 canal/outfall system made necessa~ by ~ev development
in the area.
: ~ ~B~ COASTAL
~ ~e pu~ose of t~is'subdtstrtct is to orovtde transitional
';~ densities beCveen the Conse~acion Desienaced Area and the
Urban Designated Area. 1: includes that area south
be~een the City of Naoles and Collier-Seminole State Park.
includin~ Marco Island.
In order :o facilitate hurricane evacuation and co oro:ec: the
adjacent enviro~encallv sensitive Conse~acton Desi~ated
Area. residential densities ~n this area yell be limited
· axim~ of four d~ellin~ units oer acre. Rezones are
reco~ended Co be in the fo~ of a Planned Unit Devel0~{{~C=
Janus., 1989
FUTURE LAND USE £LEHL:~T
List of per~itted uses;
Minimum crsc~ size and loc area;
Buffering, landscaping and open space
Re~ulations regarding signage, lighting, outdoor storage,
parking and loading; and
Setback requirements and maximun bulldl~ height.
&. CONHERCIAL UNDER CRITERIA -'. '.
Within the Urban-Mixed Use District certain lnflll commercial
development may be permitted. Th£s shall only apply in areas
already subs~antially zoned or developed for such uses. The
following s~anderds which limit the intensit7 o£ uses must ba
a) The proposed usa nust be bounded by existinj commercial
zoning on both sides with the exception of uses thac meet
the intent of the C-& Zoning District and the parcel
should no= exceed 100 feet In width, although the width
may be greater ac cbs discretion of the Board of County
Commissioners;
b) The proposed use must not generate in axc~sa of ten
percent of the average daily traffic on abutting
and - ~
c) The proposed use must not exceed a ffloor area off 25:~00
square feet.
B. URBAN - C0~]~ERCIAL DISTRICT
Through the use of mixed use Activity Centers and neighborhood
centers within large PUts, this District ia intended to acco~odate
virtually all new commercial zoning within Urban Designated Areas.
1. ACTIVITY CENTER gU~DISTRICT
Mixed use ~ennereiat Activity Centers have been designated on
the Future Land Use Map. The locations ara based on
intersections of major roads and on spacing criteria. The
mixed use Activity Center concept is designed
almost all new commercial zonin~ in locations where traffic
impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid scrip and
disorganized pa=terns of commercial development and to create
focal points within the community.
January, 1989 LU-I-32
Port of the Islands is a unique development which ia located
within the Urban Designated Aras, bu~ ia also to~ally
the BiS ¢}'press Area of Critical Scats Concern. Hovever~ a
portion of the development vas determined ~vested' by the State
of Florida, thus exempting lc from the requirements og Chapter
380, Florida Statutes. Further, there is an existing Develop-
menc Agreement between Port of the Islands, lac. and Cbs
of Florida Department of Community Affairs dated July 2,
vhich regulates land uses ac Port of cbs Islands. Given
unique and isolated location, and the ex,sting Development
Agreement, developaent w£thin Port of the Islands shall
reiulaced by the Developmen~ Agreement and chi overall
cial density end commercial shall hoc ~xc~d '~h~
under zon[n~ ~C ~lms et. ~dopclon of ~his Plan.
~ OF I~IRO~AL CO~EH oVeRlY
Areas of enviro~en~al conc~m ~r~ Identified on ch~ Futura ~nd Us~
Primar~ly, ches~ r~pr~s~n~ coastal beaches, m~rs~es, h~rg~ood s~ps and
c~ress ~orescs; ve~ prairies and lo~ pin~landsl ~nd, brackish
~esa are included as general representations for lnfo~l~lonll pu~os~s.
~ls overlay does hoc constitute ne~ development standards. Standards
for development are found In ~he ~onse~Cion ~nd Co~sc~l Han~gemen~
Eleman~ and ~he ~nd Development R~jul~lons.
January, 1989
:;' :~;~' LIST OF TABLES & HAPS
~ABLE
lA-! ~ Cenaralized Re~ty Datlv ~vel o~ Se~ica
~x~m~ Vol~e
2. Ex~c~nS System De~cienc~e~ on Coun~ Roads T~ I-2~
3. Co~er County HaJo~ H~ghway Ne~o~h ExisK~n$ T~
Roadway Inven~o~ & Capacity Analysis
~. Existing System Def~ciencies on S~ate Roads :- ~ 1-32
· .
5. Col[tar County ~aJor Htghw~y Ne~ork Fueu~e Trafftc." T~ 1-37
C~rculacion Improvemencs -199~
.~.~ ~-~. Existing Traffic Clrcula=lon ~ap Facill=y T~e T~
~'~ ~-IB. Exiscing Traffic Circulation Map N~ber of ~nes T~ I-8
~-IC Ex~scfnS Traffic CErculacEon Map Adopted
~vel o~ Sentra Standards
TR-2. Existing System Deficiencies Map ~ 1-26
, ~-3. Tree,lc Circulation Constraints ' '
~-~. 5 Year Cap~cal Improvement ElemenK Rap
~-5. Future Traffic C~rculac~on Nap Series- Year 199~
~-6. Future Traffic Cl~culac~on Hap Se~ea- Yea~ 1999 ~-~-65
~-7. Future Trafftc~ays Hap - Year 2015 ~-1-~9
Janus,, 1989 T~ 1-2
SYSTEM OVERVI E%;
Collier County is the larsest county in the state and spans an
area o£ over 1,994 square miles (1,276,160 acres). The major
central city area is the City of Naples which covers 11.5 square
miles and has a permanent population of 19TD64 19.515 (April 1,
The Ereater Naples urban area, loosely defined as the lands west
of CR/SR 951 (lncludinS all of Marco Island) covers 129 square
miles with an estimated permanent population of 110,000. Seasonal
population increases in the Urban area have been estimated as high
as 32% durin& the winter months.
Approximately 20 miles northeast of the Naples urban a~ee lies the
urban center of Immokalee (an unincorporated
Immokalee has a permanent population of approximately 12,800 bu=
witnesses substantial seasonal increases associated with the
asriculcural indus=ry.
Ulthin the Naples Urban Area, a grid system of predominately ''
county roads makes up the major highway network. Major
north/south routes include N. Tamiami Trail (US 41), Airport-
Pullin§ Road (CR 31), Interstate - 75, and Isle of Capri Road (¢~
951 end SR 951).
The east/west links completinS the srid are Immokalee Road
846), Pine Rldse Road (CR 896), Golden Cate Parkway (CR 886),
Davis Boulevard (SR 84), Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR 864~, and
East Tamiami Trail (US &l).
In addition to =hess major roa~, other roads such as Radio Road °o
(CR 856), Santa Barbara Boulevard, and Vanderbllt Beach Road '.
interconnect to provide the level of continuity needed to ensure
an adequate ne~ork conflsuration.
LlnkinS the Naples Urban Area and the Immokalee urban center is
the Immokalee Road (CR 846). ~lth~n Immokalee, $~ 29 passes
throush to the south on ~ts way to intersect with Alligator Alley
(SR 84), then to US 41, and finally to Everglades C~ty. The
northerly route of SR 29 out of Immokalee leads to LaBelle in
Hendry County.
In the past fifteen years, the County has made tremendous strides
in keepin& up with the ever increaain~ =ravel demands associated
'with urban growth. This Element describes the continuation of the
County's efforts co provide the means to move people, Soods, and
services throushout the County.
EXISTING SYSTEM (1957 ~)
1.) Roadway Invento~7
The existing highva7 rieL'york Inventory (Table 2) describes
the ma]or links throughout the County, lncludin& those within
Janus., 1989 TP.A ~-&
the CLoy of Naples. This inventory includes all major roads
regardless oE the ~urLsdlction havln8 oparaclons!
respo~iblll~.
~e lnvenco~ data vas provided by cbs Cl~y o~ ~aples
~n~lneerint Department, Collier County Transportation
Department, and the Flo~l~ Depa~enc o~ T~anspogCac~on.
~e Existing Traffic Clt'cull~lon Eaps (~ ~-~V through ~-
1CE) re,lace operational characteristics as of.October 1,
19871. ~e arterials and collectors have been ~lass~ed
acco=din8 co the State's F~ccional Cllss~fica~i~n System.
037 505
MAP
EXISTING TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP
NUMBER OF LANES
V,~ST'~RN COLU£R C~NTY, ~OR~D~ H~ Co.
L~ CO.
C~ C~
I~ ordez to quan~£fy, and thus measure ~ha levs~ o~
standards, this element adopts the Cenetalized ~aazty Dally
Level of Service Haxtmua Volumes tables (Tables ~A
and lB) as prepared by the Florida Department of
Transportation. These tables have been prepared ~or various
facility and area t~pe~ and-~and configurations, ns primal7
variable the: "controls" the lave1 o~ se~tce capacity ts
n~bar of si~alized tn:etsec:ions per mile. As can be seen
from the cable~, as the n~ber of at~altzea intersections
increases, the ~S capacities decrease.
~ Generalized Dally ~vel of Semite Maxim~'Vol~es
are derived from Desk hour. Desk dtrec:ion condt:tons. More
Specifically. all ~he wolves are based uoon t~e hi,heat
%~-minu~e-oeriod of the 30ch hi&hes~ ~ol~e hour of the wear
for the ht~her ~irec~ionaL flow of ~rafftc. ~e dally
vol~es in the ~able include directional, subhourlv, hourly.
dally, monthly, and seasonal oeaRin~ c~aracterts:ics of
traffic.
A detailed description o~ the preparation and use of che~e
tables t~ provided tn ~he Support
To data.the ~he level o~ ~e~tce o~ each ht&hway
on cbe major h~gbway network yarc estimated by nutttptylag
t.-eases-w~ewe-Peak-~easeaal-t~aggte-~ta-was-~et-ava~a~e~
a~auat-average-data-was-faetered-by-~si~g-the-~OT-m~ttplte~
ef-t,23-te-~ietd-a-~eak-Seaaee-~eekaay-Tza~ie-(~S~)-~et~er.
~is-fae~er-vas-derived-by-~g~-fFee-researeh-ef-a~auat-aed
seasesa~-eeuat-data various tec~ntoues and then coasted :o
the ~eneraH:ed tables.
gaee-the-PS~-ve~e-has-beeR-estieatedv-a-~eek-.p-tabte
previded-~y-~gT-~s-.sed-te-previde-a-peak-hear-faeter-Zha~
~raffie~--~e-dest&R-hear-trafgie-is-zhe-peak-heur-traffie ,.
vet~e-used-ss-~he-eeasare-ef-the-~evet-ef-se~lees-staadard~
gsee-the-peak-hear-vet~e-has-~eea-dete~iRed~-~he
~eRe~ali~ed-tables-a~e-ased-~e-p~evide-the-~eve~-ef-se~iee
January, 1989 TRA 1-13
'i ,oo, 507 "
!
TABLE IA
LEVEL OF SErViCE ]~AXIMTJM VOL~S
~ A B' C D
8
Ill 2 A-- ~ C O Z
TRA l- l&
/
TABL~ lB
GENERALIZED DA]ILY LEVEL OF SERVICE MAXIIVIU~// VOLLrMES
FOR FLORIDA'S RURAL (<5,000) AREAS
{~al~d for use from January 1989 through December 1990)
A~ ~ C D
A B C D E
A~ ~ C D
TRA I- IS
TABLE
EXISTIN~
SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES
ON COUNTY ROADS:
" Daily
LENGT~ PK,-HR,
ROADVAY SEGMEN~ (MILES) VOLU~E
Airpert-Rd,-(CR-31) ........... Radio-Rd,-(gR-8$&J-to.gavis..~..t,0 ..... '-29t! .....
................................
Airport Rd. (CR 31) Golden Gate Pkwy. 1.5 ~
to Radio Rd. (CR 856)
A[~rt-R~a~-(~R-]t) .......... Davis-~utevar~-(SR.~4) .......... ~ ...... 24~1 .....
................................ ~'Taaia~i-Trait. E-(~S.4t).
Oat~e~-~ate-P~:-{~R.~) .... G~tet~e-Fra~k-R~r-({R.~t) .... t~ ...... ~04 .....
I~kale~-R~-(GR.~4~) ........ ~S'41-t~-Alrp~rt-R~-({R.]t} .... ~0 ...... t~]f .....
................................
................................ (~R-~I)
Pin~ Ridge Road (CR 896) Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851) tr~ ~ R?~t
to Airp~rt-R~a~-(~R.]l) Shirley S~.
Source: Collier County Planning Department
January, ].989 TRA 1-25
510
~,P m-2w
EXISTING SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES MAP
... ~ ..... ~ ~.~
[ ~ ....... ~ .~ ......
-:
.....
'i'AA
,oo~ 037-",: 511."
TABLE 3
INV~88DPC COLLIER COUNTY MAJOR HIGHV/AY NETWORK (INCLUDING STATE ROADS)
EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY & CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Le~r, th 1988 i 988 Capaclt~ 0 VISed
ROADWAY NAME RD.# SEGMENT (Mi.)ffl..aLn. MI Count LOS AADT LOS Ratio
AirportRd. CR31 Irru-nokzlozRd. toVa,~dcrbiltBch. Rd. 2.0 4 8.0 !1859 A 34900 D 34%
Airport Rd. CR31 Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. to Pine Rktge Rd. 2.0 4 8.0'.18092 A 34900 D 52%
Airport Rd. CR31 Pine Ridge Rd. to Golden G~te Parkway 2.5 4 10.0 28743 A 34900 D 82
ALrport Rd. CR31 Golden Gat~ Parkway 1o Radio Rd. I.$ 4 6.0 3~956 F 31700 D 123%
Airport Rd. CR31 Radio Rd. to Davis Blvd. 1.0 '4 4.0 28~145 C 31700 D 90%
Airport Rd. CR31 Davis Blvd. to US 41 0.8 4 3.0 23566 C 31700 D 74%
Bsysbor¢ (l~tly) Rd. US 41 Io Thompson Dr. 1.5 4 6.0 13580 C 24300 D 56
Botxlta Be. ach Rd. We~t of V~.ndcrbih Dr. 1.0 2 2.0 15476 F I 1600 D 133
County Barn Rd. Davia Blvd. to CR 864 2.0 2 d.O 6673 C ! 1600 D 58
County Road 29 CR29 US41 to Chokolskee Island 7.8 2 15.6 1472 A 15000 D 10%
Davis Blvd. $R84 US 41 to Airport Rd. 1.0 6 6.0 19208 B 47900 D 40%
Davis Blvd. $R84 Airport Rd. to Kings Lake= Blvd. 1.3 2 2.5 15422 E 15300 D 101%
Davis Blvd. $R84 Kings Lake Blvd. to County Barn Rd. 1.0 2 2.0 12229 B 15300 D 80%
Davis Blvd. $R84 County Barn Rd. to Santa Barbara Blvd. 1.4 2 2.8 12229 B 14500 C 84%
Davis Blvd. SR84 Santa Barbara Blvd. to CR-951 2.5 2 5.0 6,.180~ A 14500 C 45~
Golden Gate Parkway CR886 US 41 to Goodlctte-Frank Rd: 0.5 6 3.0 16224 A 39500 D
Golden Gate Parkway CRSg6Goodlette-Frank Rd. lo Airport Rd. 1.6 4 6.4 31892 B 34900 D 91
Golden Gate Parkway CR886Airport RD. to 1-75 2.0 4 8.0 19902 A 3490~3-. D 57%
Golden G~t,- Parkway CR8861-75 to Santa Barbara Blvd. 1.0 4 4.0 18451 A 34900 . D 53%
Golden Gate Parkway CRS$6Santa Barbara Blvd. to Isle of Capri Rd. 2.4 4 9.6 12965 A 34900 D
Goodlct,-'-Frank Rd. CR851 Carles RD. Io Pin~ Ridge Rd. 1.5 2 3.0 NA ? 11600 D 0
GooJlctu:oFrankRd. CR851PincRidgeRd. toSol~r, aDr. 1.0 4 4.0 20167 B 32500 D 62%
Goodlctu:-FrankRd. CR8515olanaRdtoGoldcnCratePaxkway 1.6 4 6.4 26007 B 32500 D 80%
Goodle. tte-Frank Rd. CR851Goldcn Gag Parkway to US 41 2.0 6 12.0 28377 C 46300 D 61
Gulfshor~ Dr. I I I t~ Ave N. to Va~derbih l~ach Rd. 1.3 2 2.6 NA 7 11500 D
Isl~ of Capri Rd. CR951 lmmokzl~ Rd. to Golden Gate Blvd. 3.0 2 6.0 4391 B 15000 D 29
Isle of Capri Rd. CR95Z Golden Gat~ Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 1.0 2 2.0 9983 D 15000 D 67%
hl¢ of Capri Rd. CR951 Pine Ridge Rd.to Golden GnU: Parkway 2.0 2 4,0 12649 D 15000 D 84%
hie of Capri Rd. CR951Goldzn Gate Parkway to Davis Blvd: 2.0 4 8.0 10850 C 27400 D
hl~; of Capri Rd. CR951 Davis Blvd. to Rattlesna~ Hax'm'nock Rd. 3.0 2 6.0 I0850 D 15000 D 72%
Isle: of Capri Rd. CR951Ratt.lesn~,k,: Hammock Rd. to US 41 3.4 2 6.8 10850 D 15000 D 72%
Isle of Capri. Rd. $R951 US 41 to Marmt~ Rd. 1.0 2 2.0 16158 D 17400 E 93%
lsle of Capri Pal. $R951Manat~ Rd. to Mar~ Bridge 5.3 2 10.6 16158 D 17400 E 93~
Isle of Capri Rd. 5R951 Marco Bridge to CR 953 0.8 4 3.2 14037 C 26400 E 53
I~le of Capri Rd. $R951 CR 953 to CR92 1.4 4 5.6 14725 C 26400 E
TRA-I-2 8
SOURCE: Collier County Planning Department, May 1989
\
TABLE 3
FNV'8~DPC COLLIER COUNTY MAJOR IflGHWAY NETWORK (INCLUDING STATE ROADS)
EXISTING ROADWAY INVENTORY & CAPACITY
~th 1988 1988 Cap~c~ ~) VI$~
ROADWAYNAJk'IE RD.// SEGMF'ZNT (Mi.)ffLnL,.~.Mi Count LOS A.ADT LOS P,.~io
IIIthAvN CRi46GulfshorcDr. toUS41 1.5 2 3.0 .,4960 C 11600 D 43~
Immok~loe Rd. CRi46U$ 41 to AL-port Ed. 2.0 2 4.0 ' 12638 A 15.~00 D
lmmolu, lee Rd. CR846Airport Rd. to 1-75 1.5" 2 3.0 .i769 A 15500 D $3~
Lmmok,lee Rd. CR$461-75 to CR951 3.4 2 5.8 7317 A 16500 D '
lrn,'nol~oe Rd. CR846CR~)51 to SR 29 25.5 2 51.0 2885 A 15000 D 19~
Intcr~s~a.u: 75 SR93 Brow'ard County Line to $R29 29.2 2 .~8.4 4467 B 9400 C
lnu:rstat-' 75 $R93 $R2c) to CR951 20.9 2 41.8 4038 B' 9400 C 43
In~rstate?.S $R93 CR951 toPLneRidr, cRd. 5.9 4 23.5 86<28 A 5Il(X) C
Inu=rstatc 75 SR93 Piz~ Ridge Rd. to Immok~lee Rd. 4.2 4 16.8 15832 A 61100 C
ln~r~t~t~75 SR93 lrm:nokaleeRd, to Loc County L[=~ 3.1 4 12.4 21804 A 61100 C 36%
Logan Blvd. P~nc Ridge Ed. to Gree~ Blvd. 1.0 2 2.0 NA ? Il600 13
Logan Blvd. VanderbUt Bch. Rd. to Pino Ridge Rd. 2.0 2 4.0 NA 7 11600 D
N. Itt Street (IM) Main St. to New Market Rd. 0.6 2 1.2 NA 7 11600 D
Old "41' CR88~ U$`11 to Lee County Lin,' 1.6 2 3.2 66'50 C 11600 D
Piz~ Rkl~e RD. CR896Wc~t of US -11 0.5 4 2.0 7812: B 31700 D
Pine R~ge RD. CR896 US 41to Go<xilctte-Fran,k Rd. 0.5 4 2.0 27155 C 317Q~), D
Piz~RkI&oED. CR896Goocllct~-Fr~kRd. toSl~i'lcyS~. 1.0 4 4.0 33276 E 31700 D 105~
Pin,= Ri, d&c RD. CR8965hL'Icy St. to Airport Rd. 0.5 4 2.0 28508 C 31700 D
PL,~ Ridge RD. CR896AL"'port RD. to 1-75 2.0 4 8.0 24.1107 A 34900 D
Ph:~ Ri<igc RD. CR8961-75 to Isle of Capri Rd. 3.0 4 12.0 6677 A 34900 D 19
P,--"Ho Rd. CR856 AL-port Rd. to Kings Way ! .3 2 2.5 9498 D 11600 D 82
P,~io Rd. CR856Kings Way to S~ta Barbar~ Blvd. 1.8 2 3.5 '/352 C 11600 D
~Radlo Rd. CR856$ant~ Barbara Blvd. to $R-84 1.5 2 3.0 NA 7 11600 D
R~ttl~n. aJ~ Hmck Rd. CRE64U$ 41 to C-'harlcmar~c Blvd. 0.4 2 0.8 10135 D 11600 D
R,~tLlcsnak', Hmck Rd. CR854Ch~trlc-mag. n¢ Bird to County Barn Rd. 0.9 2 1.7 7334 C 11600 Et
Ratd~nnl',~ Hmck Rd. CR864County Barn Rd. to PoUy Ave. 0.8 2 1.5 ?380 C 11600 D ~4,~
R~td~md~ Hmck Rd. CR854 Polly Avc. to Islc of Cnpri Rd. 2.0 2 4.0 3045 C 11600 D 26
San~ B~rab~tra Blvd. Green Blvd. to Golden Crate Parkwa~ 1.5 4 6.(~ 10946 C 24300 D
StnLa Barabara Blvd. Golden G~t~ Parkway to P,.~lio Ed. 1.5 4 6.0 13431 C 24300 D
Sant~ Bar~bara Blvd. R~[o Rd. to D~v[s Blvd. l.O 4 4.0 7438 C 24300 D 31
$t.a~ Road 29. $R.29 U$41 to 1-75 15.9 2 33.8 1343 A 9400 C 14~
Star, Road29 $R2,~ 1-75 to CR29A$outh 19.8 2 39.6 734 ^ ¢400 C
Stat~ Road 29 $R.?.9 CR.29AaouthtoEn,:iot'Fou. rlaz~ 1.0 4 4.0 12023 A 32500 C 37~
SU~U~ Road 29 SR29 ~ of Four l~ne to CR29A north 2.1 2 4.2 7089 A 15300 C 46
Stay Road 29 SR29 CR29A North to SR82 2.9 2 5.8 6,157 C 9400 C 69
Smu: Road 29 SR29 SR82 to [{enclry County LL~,' 2.1 2 4.2 330{~ B 9400 C
TRA-'r- 29
SOUl:ICI:: Collier Gounty Planning Department, May 1989
"
TABLE 3
INVg8DPC COLLIER COUNTY MAJOR IIIGIt3VAY NE'I'9/ORK (INCLUDING fi'rATE ROADS)
[:'.~STING ROADWAY INVF, NTORY & CAPACITY ANALYSI,S
Lt:~r, th 1988 1988 Caps,,-;90 V/SM
ROADW'AYNAME RD.// SEGMENT (Mi.)~,..aLn. Mi. Couat LOS AAD'r LOS P,~lo
Stata Road 82 $R82 SR291oLoeCountyLin¢ 7.1 2 14.2 · 3573 B 9400 C 38n
TamlamiTrall East US,i[ 'Four Corr~rs' to Goodlct',' Rd. 0.3. 6 1.8 '32331 D 46300
T.rniamiTrail Ea,~t US41 Goodleuc Rd. ~o Davis Blvd. 0.6 ' 6 3.6 490'33 E 46300 D 106n
Tarniam[Trail East US,II Davis Blvd. lo Airport Rd. 1.5 a 6.0 27~42 C 31700 D
Taraiarn[ Trail Ea. st US41 A{rport Rd. {o Rattle,,snak¢ Hmck. Rd. 1.7 4 6.8 31992 E 31700 D 101
TamlamiTrail Eas{ US-II Rattlenna.ka Hmck. Rd. Io Barefoot Wins. I 3.0 4 12.0 29902 B 34900 D 864
TamlamiTrail East US,II Barefoot Wt"ns. Rd. toSR951 1.5 4 6.0 16533 A' 34900 D 47,~
TamlamlTrmil East US`11 SR951 {oCR92 8.1 2 16.2 `11'/1 B 9400 C 4,14
TamismlTrail East U$41 CR 92 {o SR 29 15.7 2 31.4 3,15,1 B 9,100 C 374
Tamla~ Trail East US,11 SR 29 to Dado County Lin~ 32.3 2 6-1.6 3779 B 9`100 C 40
TamiamlTrmilNorth US`11 Lo~Co. lincmW[gr, insPasaRd. 1.5 4 6.0 18311 B 31000 C 59n
Tam{axnl Trail North U$,41 Wiggh'~s Pass Rd. to In'anokale~ Rd. 1.5 `1 6.0 25130 B 32500 D
TamlamlTrmilNorth US`11 Irrurlokalex:Rd. toVanderbiltBch. Rd. 1.5 ,1 6.0 3[336 D 32500 D
TamlarniTrall North U541 Vanderbill Bch. Rd. Io l_aural Oak Dr. 2.3 4 9.2 31366 D 32500 D 97n
TamiamiTrail North US`1[ [,aural Oak Dr. to Pint: Ridge Rd. 0.2 4 0.8 39568 F 32500 D 1224
Tamla. mi Tr,il North U$41 Pia~:Rid&cRd, to Sola.aa Rd. 1.0 4 `1.0 30852. E 30200 D
TamiamiTrail North U$41 Solana Rd. Io Ctw,,,ch Rd. 1.0 6 6.0 30852 D `1630~3_ D 67n'
TaralamiTrail North U541 Crw,,ch Rd. to Golden Gate Parkway 0.6 6 3.6 26264 C ,16300' D $74
Tan'tlami Trail North U$41 Golden Gag Parkway to 4th Ave N. 1.5 6 9.0 22226 C 46300 D ,18n
Tamlaml Trail Nor~ U$41 ,1th Ave N. to 'Four Corne:ra' 0.6 6 3,6 20337 (2 46300 D
Vsaderbilt Be, ach Rd. CR862Gulfshore Dr. to US 41 1.4 2 2.8 9368 D 11600 D 81
Vandcrbilt Be, ach Rd. CR862Airport Rd. to 1-75 2.0 2 4.0 NA 7 15000 D
Vaad~rbilt Be, ach Rd. CR862 [-75 lo hl¢ of (2apri Rd. 3.0 2 6.0 NA IEW 15000 D
Vanderbilt Drlva cRg01 Bonita Be, ach Rd. to Wiggins Pass Rd. 2.5 2 5.0 4172 C 11600 D 36e,~'
Vandcrbilt Drive CRg01 Wiggins Pasa Rd. to 111 th Ave. N. 1 .,5 2 3.0 NA 7 11600 D
Wiggins Pass Rd. CR$88Va. nderbih Dr. to US 41 1.0 2 2.0 NA ? 11600 D on
TRA-I- 30
SOURCE: Collier County Planning Deparlment, May 1989
~.) System De£1ciencies . $~te ~o~ds
For ~hose ~ortions of ge the State highway system~ loca~
outside the Ct~¥ of Naole~ th£s plan incorporates the level
of service standards found in the Florida Transportation
Plan.
These standards applied to State roadways in
~nincorDora;ed areas of Collier County are as follows:
1-75 C O
US &l C D '.
SR 84 C D
SR 951 E
SR 29 C
SR 82 C
January, 1959 TRA I-]l
,oo 037 515 '.
The Exis~lnz Urbanized Areas and Transitionfn~ Established
Areas are identified in Hah TR-I-AU. The Statevide Hintmu~
Acceptable Opera,inS Level of Sat'vice Standardi for the S~ata
Highway System are more thoroughly explained In the Support
Document.
Based upon the methodologies outlined above, the County has
determined that the State roads sho~rn in Table 4 and on
Map TR-2 (W & £) aro operating at or below the acceptable
level of service.
TABLE ~
EXISTINO '. '.
.. SYSTFR~ DEFICIENCIES
ON STATE ROADS:
1987 1987
Detl~
LENOTH PK,RR, Pk,~,
ROADWAY SEGMENT CMILES) VOLUME LOS
Tamiami ~rail E, Airport Rd. to Rattlesnake 1,7 2~0
Hammock Road 31.992
Isle of Capri Rd, US &l to Marco Island ~,3 1~00 E-
Tamlamf-Tzait-E~ .... ;-~er~ers-~e-~avis-Blv~: ..... 0:$ ......... ~9~0 ........ E-
-o
Tamlaml Treil N, P£ne Ridge Rd. To Solana Rd, 1.1 ~970 E
B0.8~2
Tamtami Tr~ll ~. Pine ~td~e Rd. To L~urel .1 39.568 F
Oak Dr.
Source: Collier County Planning Department.
January, 1989 TRA 1-32
' ,oo 037 516
\
TABLE
CIE CDLLIER COUNTY MAJOR HIGHWAY NETWOR~
FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEIflENTS -
Existing Added Total
CIE! RDA~AY NAME SEGMENT Length #Lns.Ln.Mi.#Lns. Ln. Mi Improvement
I Illth Ay N Vanderbtlt Dr. to US ql 1.5 2 3 2 & add 2 lanes
2 Airport Rd. Golden Gate Parkway to US qt 3.25 q 13 2 19.5 add 2 lanes
q Davis Blvd. County Barn Rd. to Santa Barbara Blvd. 0.75 2 1.5 2 3 add 2 lanes
3 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Rd. to Airport Rd. 1.6 4 6.4 2 ?,6 add 2 lanes
6 Immokalee Rd. Airport Rd. to [-75 1.5 2 3 2 & add ~ lanes
7 Immokalee Rd. US 41 to Airport Rd. ~ 2 ~ ~ O add ~ lanes
B Immokalee Rd. I-r§ to Isle of Capri Rd. 3.q 2 6.8 2 13.6 add ~ lanes
10 Isle of Capri Rd. Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. to US 4i 3.5 2 7 ~ lq add ~ lanes
Il Isle of Capri Rd. Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 3 2 6 2 12 add 2 lanes
12 I~le of Capri Rd. US 41 to Marco Island 6.3 2 12.& 2 25.2 add 2 lanes
13 Isle of Capri Rd. Golden Gate Blvd. to ~Jrd Ave. S~ 3 2 6 2 12 add 2 lanes
14 Pine Ridge RD. US 41 to Airport Rd.. 2 4 B 2 1~ add 2 lanes
15 Radio Rd. Airport Rd. to Santa Barb~ra Blvd. ~ 2 & 2 12 add 2 lanes
16 Radio Rd. Santa Barbara Blvd. to SR-B~ 1.6 2 3.2 2 6.4 add 2 lanes
17 Rattlesnake Hmck Rd. US 41 to Polly Ave. 2 q 2 B add 2 lanes
19 GqOdlette-Frank Rd. Immokalee Rd to Carica Rd. 2.5 0 0 2 5 new 2 lane road
20 Gulfshore Dr. Illth Ave N. to Vanderbitt Beach Rd. 1.3 2 E.6 I 3.9 add third lane
21 Livingston Rd. Imperial ST. to Immokalue Rd. 6.2 0 0 ~ l~.q ne~ 2 lane road
E2 Logan Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. to Green BlYd. [ 2 2 2 q add 2 lanes
23 Vanderbl!t Beach Rd. US 41 to Airport Rd. 2.2 0 '0 ~ q.4 new 2 lane road
24 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Oaks Blvd. to Isle of Capri Rd. 3 0 0 2 & ne~ 2 lane road
25 Vanderbllt Drive Bonita Beach Rd. to tilth Ave 3.~ 2 7.B 2 15.6 add 2 lanes
26 Wes[clock Rd. Carson Rd. to ~r 2~ I 0 0 2 2 ne~ 2 lane road
27 Major Road Reconstruction Projects .....
2B Traffic Signalization Installation Pro~ects .' ..........
31 Bonita Beach Rd. Uest of Vanderbilt Dr. .- I q 4 2 & add 2 lanes
32 Santa Barabara Blvd. Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hmck. Rd. 2 0 0 ~ B new 4 lane road
33 County Barn Rd. Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 2 2 q 2 B add 2 lanes
34 Advanced R.O.W Acquisition
35 Carson Rd. Lake Trafford Rd. to Immokalee Dr. 0.6 0 0 2 1.2 ne~ 2 lane road
3& New N/S Rd. CR 858 to CR Bq6 ,I 5.7 0 0 2 11.~ ne~ 2 lane road
37 Isle of C~pri Rd. Immc~alee Rd. to Golden Gate Blvd. 3 2 & 2 12 add 2 lanes
3B Pedestrlan Overpass SR 29 ~ Far,workers Village 0 0 0 0 0 pad.overpass
Source: C~llte? County Transportation Department"
YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT MAP
Y~STE:,qN C~LLIER CCUNi'Y
~[mDRY CO.
C~U[R CO.
~oo~ 037~:'.~ 518
cou.:[.,~ co. 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVE:,,IENT
ELEMENT MAP
EASTERN CCLL~ER CCUNTY
CCI,
}
/
!
FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP
YEA~ lggg
'/~:STERN CO[.LI£R COUNTY
~ C~U[E CO,
,
~0.
.
520
FUTURE T~AFFICWAY$ MAP
YEA~ 2015
;'~STERN COLLIER COUNTY
~ LEE O.
CO.
COLLIER COUNt, ~ORIOA
FREEwAy LANE RETIREMENTS
. ~., ..................
E'~ ~N TERCH~NCE ~ %'":
J [XIS~NC IN T[RCHANC[ O
~. .~ ..... ;.~ ,,~/,~' /..0
TRA 1-49
RECREATION AND OPEN :;PACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(SECTION I)
CHAPTER ' PAGE
I. THE DEVELOPMENT OF STA3~DARDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY RO-i-1
II. CALCULATION OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY
REQUIREMENT RO-1-3
III. ~ARKS PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT RO-I-4
IV. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES RO-I-5
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CSECTION II1
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION RO-II-1
II~ RECREATION PLANNING PRINCIPLES RO-II-3
III. PARKS AND RECREATION TRENDS AND ISSUES '~ RO-II-4
IV. INVENTORY: EXISTING RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ROJII-5
A. E×istinq Recreation Facilities
1. Resource-Based and Activity-Based sites
and Facilities RO-II-5
2. Passive and Active Recreation RO-II-5
3. Recreation for All Ages RO-II-6
4. Recreation in the Private Sector RO-II-6
5. Recreation for Visitors RO-II-6
6. A Spectrum of Leisure RO-II-6 ~
B. Existing 0o~O Soace RO-II~7
1. Open Space RO-II-7
2. Multi-Use Open Space RO-II-8
V. ANALYSIS: DEMAND AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT RO-II-8
A. ~oDulation Growth an~ Future Residents RO-II-8
B. The Recreation Needs Suwey RO-II-9
1. Resident Recreation Demand RO-II-10
2. Visitor and Tourist Recreation De~3and RO-II-10
3. Recreation Needs for Special Population Groups RO-II-10
C. ~ecreatioD add Open Space Standards and Provisions RO-II-11
1. Recreation Standards . RO-II-11
2. The Provision of Open Space RO-II-12
3. Proximity and Access to Recreation Facilities RO-II-13
D. Future Recreation Demand RO-II-13
VI. THE PLAN FOR RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE RO-II-14
A. The Plan ~0~ Parks and Recreation Ea__cilitie$ RO-II-14
B. ~ncreas~c Recreational o~ortunit~es .'~ RO-II-15
Provided bv the Private Sector ..
C. The SEE ProGram RO-II-15
· D. FiDancinq the Pla~ R6-II-16'
,,oo,~ 037~,~. 524
APPENDICES
(SECTION II)
PAGE
A- cOll.!er County user's Surveys RO-II-17
B. Col~ier County Be~ch Suwey ' RO-II-22
C. Population Project~ons by Se~ecte~.year .by
Pla~ninq..c~mmunitie$: . permanen~ and seasonal RO-II-25
D. The Develooment of Recreation Standards for
COld,er County RO-II-2B
E. parks and Recreation Sub-Committee Reoort RO-II-31
F. Glossary of Terms RO-11-29
G. $ibliocraohv RO-II-34
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1: INVE~ITORY OF EXISTING PARK~'AND RECREATION SITES ~
AND FACILITIES IN COLLIER COUNTY, OPEN TO THE PUBLIC,
BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, 1987 RO-II-35
TABLE 2: RECREATION STANDARDS ~4D FACILITIES RO-II-37
TABLE 3: ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR PARK ~D RECREATION
FACILITIES RO-11-38
TABLE 4: REGIONAL/URBAN DESIGN ASSISTANCE TEAM (RUDAT)
.TECHNICAL REPORT RO-II-39
LIST OF MAPS
INVENTORY OF EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION SITES AND
FACILITIES IN COLLIER COUNTY: 1987 RO-II-47
I'9,P
EXISTING PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
NORTH HA,PL,~.~ I~,IPACT ~ DISTRICT
:o- 037m526
}iAi' PB-IA
PLANNED PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
NORTH NA.m,.E$ I~CPACT ~ DISTWI,'T
/
I
H
'--' " '{I-
,~ V -. '
1
"
:~ .................... ~ ................. R0-II~48 ............................
03'7 ,,~'- 527
EXISTING PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
I.~ARCO ISL.~,I~ID I~aPAf.*T /'~£ DISTRICT
HAP PB-2A '
PLANNED PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
1,4ARCO ISt.AND 1~4PACT ~ DISTT~ICT
C~lr Co~t~ F~ar'ld~l
EXISTING PLIBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
IMI~OKAL~ II~PACT F"E~ OISTRICT
5C^Lg
0 l~l. 2~41.
, .mm. /
MAP PB-3A
PLANNED PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
IUUOKAL~-[ I~PACT ~ DI$TR!CT
0 1)al. 2~L
EXISTING PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
NOT IH ANY I~PACT ~ DISTRICT
_
,o~ 037,:,,, 532
NAP PB-~A
PLANNED PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
NOT IN ~,~Y I~P~.CT ~ D~T~ICT.
~,O-ZT-54
037, 533
PLANNED PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
¢OLD~:..N C.,.TE luP^CT FL'[ DISi"RIC?
~ C~nty. ~o~de
MAP PB-6A
PLANNED PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AND BOAT RAMPS
NOT 1~'! ANY' P,~K ~JPACT ~ DIS'~'~ICT
I]37,,~: 535 "
'7----
EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
NORTH tlA,e!,~.~ IMPACT F'~E
/
~oo,: C~,.-.: 536
P-IA
PLANNED PARKS AND RECREATION. FACILITIES
NORTH NAPL.~ I~PACT Jt'E~ DISTEICT
037,,~,* 53'7 "
~P ?-2
EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
~.AST NAPLES I~PACT ~ DIS~ICT
SCA~
,oo~ 037m 538
EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
MARCO ~..M~O I~P,J.CT ~"[[ DISTRICT
,oo~ 037m 539 "
EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
,oo, 037,-,: 540
PLANNED PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
I~C~,At r~ IMPACT ~ DISTR~CT
/
...
SCALE
EXISTING' PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
COU)m~ GAI~ lUPXCT F'~£ DISTRICT
542 '
EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
· ' NOT IN AHY IMPACT ~ DISTRICT
543'
EXISTING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
NOT IN ANY 1~4PAC'T ~"~£ DISTRICT
PLANNED PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
$O~JTH NAF)!.E$ I~PACT F'["E OISTR~CT
C~t,. C4,~,,. rl,~M4 Ir'
i I 2
~
,
544 "
IiAP p-IOA
PLANNED PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
NOT IN ANY PARK I~PACT
PLANNED PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
URSA~ [STATES ~,IPA(:T F~ DIS"f~CT
. , ~ ~ ~ " I
*- SCA~
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
AS AMENDED, JANUARY01990
URBAN CONSERVATION OVERLAYS AND
MIXED USE ~] SPECIAL FEATURES
[ LANDS ACQUIRED FOR CONSERVATION
UR.qAN RESIDENTIAL INCORPOI~ATE'.D AREAS
URBAN COASTAL AGRICULTURAL / RURAL
~ URBAN R£S, DENT1AL MIXED USE
FRINCE
] ------ COASTAL MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY
AGRICULI~.~RAt' / RESIDENTIAL
PUD NEICHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL [~J
UNDER CRI11~RIA SETTLEMENT AREA
COMMERC--IAL
UNJ)E~R CRITERIA INDUSTRIAL ~AIRPORT NOISE AREA
INDUSTRIAL
I UNDER CRITERIA COMMERCIAL O
MIXED USE ACTIVlTy CENTER UNDER CRITERIA RESlDE~qTIAL DENSITY BANDS
~ ACTIVITY CENTER GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
] MIXED USE
FUTURE ACTI~ITY CENTER
~-~ RESIDENTIAL
~NTERST~TE ^C~TY CENTER COUU£ROAL UNDER CmT£mA
NOTE :
(t) THIS MAP CAN NOT [~IE INTerPRETED WITHOUT THE GOALS, OBJ~CTIV~s AND POLICIES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANACEM£NT PLAN.
(~) £XACT BOUND^R,ES OF INTERSTATE ^CTI~ITY CENTERS AR[ IDENTIFIED IN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT.
i) TH£ AREAS OF ENViROnMENTAL CONCERN OVERLAY IS A CENERAL REPRESENTATION OF WETLANDS. ' ·
) THE CONSE~VATION DESIC, NA~ION IS SUBJECT TO CHANCE AS AREAS ARE ACQUIRED AND MAY INCt~ULi~. OUTPARC£LS. THE FUIUR£
LAt~D USE MAP SERIES IDENTIFIES AREAS PROPOSED FOR PUBUC ACQUISITION.
(5) THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES INCLUDES THE FOCLOWINC: t'UTUR£ LAND USE; PUBLIC FAClUTI£$, NATURAL RESOURCES; NATURAL
RESOURCES (Y~TLAND$); 50~LS; AND INTERSTATE ACTIVITY CENTERS.,
H£NDEY COUNTY
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUI.tTY OF COLLIER
I, JAMES C, GILES, Clerk of Courts in and for the'
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that th~ foregoing is a true copy of:
Ordinance No. 90-11
which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on
the 30th day of January, 1990, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Boar~ of ..
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 2nd
day of February, 1990.
JAMES C. G~'LES ~.,;2t''''-
Clerk of Courts and Clerl~'\J":~ a ~,~.
Ex-officio to Board of .-'.-. ...... ',. *~ , *~ '
County Commissfoner~ ,~].' '< ".**~ ". ~.',
:,~.',- 2 - ,' ~
~y: /s/Mau~'een ~yon ,,, .... .
Deputy Clerk '* .'% · * ..."<."
· ~,.) ~- . . ~ ~
r