CCPC Backup 02/26/2009 RLSA
CCPC
SPECIAL
MEETING
RLSA
PHASE II
FIVE YEAR REVIEW
BACKUP
DOCUMENTS
FEBRUARY 26, 2009
AGENDA
COLUER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 1:00 P.M. FRIDAY FEBRUARY 20, 2009
[CARRYOVER DATE OF FEBRUARY 26, 2009] AT COLUER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CENTER, CONFERENCE ROOMS 609/610, LOCATED AT 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES,
FLORIDA:
~ INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE UMITED TO 5 MINUTES
ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF
AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE
ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED
BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR
GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS
MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO
THE RESPECTIVE PUBUC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN
MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHAll.
BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM
OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBUC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL
USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A
PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR
PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, IF
APPUCABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE ccpe
WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING
THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CAll. BY SECRETARY
3. FIVE YEAR REVIEW OF THE RURAL LANDS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM PHASE II REPORT
PREPARED BY THE RURAL LANDS STEWARDSHIP AREA REVIEW COMMmEE, DATED
JANUARY, 2009.
4. ADJOURN
,
2120109 CCPe AgendafTG!mk
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
GENERAL COMMENTS
&
GENERAL COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED
SPECIFIC LANGUAGE RECOMMENDATIONS TO RLSA REVIEW
February 2009
1) Reference the need for a proportionate fair sn
improvements can then be addressed in these do
2) Policy 4.9:
a. Define the meaning of "infra
3) Modify the new Ove
previously shown
shown in the soutli
verla areas where restoration was
open lands were previously
4)
to reinstate the Recreational Uses layer with its
b. REDIT KSHEET to reinstate the Agricultural- Support Uses
layer e of 0.1
c. Correct t ARDSHIP CREDIT WORKSHEET to remove the new line for
Restoration esources Uses with a value of 0.0.
d. Correct STEWA CREDIT WORKSHEET to correct land use layer values to those
matching original program. Residential should be 0.2 not 0.4; Earth Mining and Processing
Uses should be 0.1 not 0.2; Agricultural Group 1 Uses should be 0.2 not 0.1.
e. Review methodology to include a conversion of the STEWARDSHIP CREDIT WORKSHEET into
the text of the GMP to avoid errors which the RLSA committee did not sponsor, as described
in #3, #4, #S, #6 and #7 above.
5) Modify Attachment C, STEWARDSHIP RECEIVING AREA CHARACTERISTICS, as follows:
a. Clarify by double underlining the new and proposed language. (Single underline already is
used in this table to denote required uses.)
b. Change Village acres to "greater than 100 -1500".
c. Change Town acres to "greater than 1500 -5000"
d. Add "County Transit Access" to CRD's
e. Move Transient Lodging in all categories from "Maximum Floor Area Ratio" to "Residential
Housing Styles"
f. In.. footnote, change reference to policy 4.22 to 4.21.
g. Review "Minimum Floor Area Ratio or Intensity" refere
6) Determine who is paying for the processing of the GMP
Policy 1.. ing adopted but have not changed ownership in
the SSA and have not transferred, sold or utilized credits
e prop wner may withdraw the SSA designation provided such
ithin 6 months of the adoption of this Policy 1.6.1."
7) Seminole land development, including casinos an
they will have a significant impact on LOS.
1)
b) r introductory paragraph and move to LDC.
2) Policy 1.7:
a) Retain multiple agen
3) Policy 2.2:
a) Remove from the middle of the paragraph the sentence "Open Lands are those lands described
in Policy 4.2." Open Lands are actually described in the sentence immediately prior to this one.
b) Consider variable Ag land base credits to reflect primary panther areas. Suggest adding
language to the end of the sentence referring to (2.6) Credits per acre within the ACSC: "...or
Open Lands determined to be primary panther habitat."
4) Policy 2.3:
a) Reinstate policy.
5) Policy 2.4:
a) Reinstate policy.
6) Policy 3.11:
a) (2): Clarify last sentence requirement that the 8 additional credits are contingent on acquisition
of all of the land needed for a viable corridor, not just restoration of individual pieces. Suggest
changing last sentence to read: "Once an entire corridor meeting the minimum criteria
established for such corridor, is dedicated as SSA's and restoration of the entire corridor is
completed by the land Owner(s), this shall be rewarded with 8 additional credits per acre."
b) (3): remove last sentence from this section and move into f standing paragraph.
7) Policy 3.13:
a) Remove the word "exclusively" in second to last line.
"...used as water management for the SRA...".
8) Policy 4.2:
a) Use maximum credits of existing program
development in lieu of establishing maxi
of credits and possibly reprioritization of cr
remain within the 315,000 credi s established
provides for the maximum pr of existin a
the initial program. Suggest cha dded sen
"Total SRA designation shall be a 'on of 3
9) Policy 4.5:
a) Remove "To th
b) Replace "be c
c) Insert after Coun
10) Policy 4.7 .
a)
11) Po
a)
b)
c)
d)
'ew the recalculation
enerated to
at re
o inclu onvenience retail uses".
suppo services when residential uses are included.
d quantity of contiguous CRD's allowed. Suggest the following to
aintain a proportion of CRDs of 100 acres or less to Villages and
s of 100 acres or les may be approved as SRAs prior to the approval
of a Village or Town, thereafter not more than 5 additional CRDs of 100 acres or less may
be approved for each subsequent Village or Town. There shall be no more than 5 CRDs of more
than 100 acres in size."
12) Policy 4.7.4:
a) Add the following after "economic": "sustainabilityand"
b) Remove balance of this policy after the first sentence.
13) Policy 4.10:
a) Add to end of last sentence to note that all open space is included within SRA maximum
acreage: "...but shall be counted as part of the SRA acreage."
14) Policy 4.14:
a) In first sentence of second paragraph, replace "primary town or community" with "SRA" in both
places where this occurs.
b) Drop from last line of last paragraph and replace with a period: "that are anticipated to be
expanded or constructed".
15) Policy 4.15.1:
a) Add new language at end of 3'd sentence to clarify that SRA's cannot be dependent upon
facilities in other SRA's unless capacity is proven to exist in the other SRA. Suggested: "...,
provided the capacity of those adjoining area's facilities as cribed in Attachment C to be
utilized by the newly created SRA can demonstrate suffi pacity exists for their desired
uses per the standards of Attachment c."
16) Policy 4.16:
a) Add at the end of third line after "The capacit
b) Add language in 5th line after the word "in
c) Remove language in middle of paragrap
in size". (redundant language)
17) Policy 4.17:
a) Add to second line after refer
18) Policy 4.18:
a) Replace beginning words in secon " with: "In the event that a" and
remove "in the RL /I
b)
c)
lace ith a semi-colon.
nty costs to the SRA are to be
e surplus revenues. Suggested language: "In the
lated impacts to Collier County outside of
19) Po
a)
b) Re
20) Policy 4.21:
a) Clarify 5th It
the word "Pro
form of Villages 0
21) Policy 4.23: SUGGESTED
"The acreage of open space and public benefiL"
um development acres in ACSC. Modify sentence beginning with
s: "Provided not more than 500 acres of SRA development in the
II not exceed 500 acres, exclusive of any lake...."
"Within I-year of approval of this policy LDC regulations shall be implemented for outdoor
lighting using standards modeled from the Dark Sky program to protect the nighttime
environment, conserve energy, and enhance safety and security."
22) Policy 5.1:
a) After the reference to FSA's at the end of the third sentence, sixth line, add language from policy
4.9 that reads: "Infrastructure necessary to serve permitted uses may be exempt from this
restriction, provided that designs seek to minimize the extent of impacts to any such areas."
23) Policy 5.3:
a) Replace the words in the fourth line "..., the following regulations are applicable,..." with the
following: "these Group 5 Policies shall apply and"
24) Policy 5.4:
a) Modify the added language in the third line that states "used in evaluating" and replace with:
"shall be incorporated into".
25) Policy 5.5:
a) (1) Replace added language "protected species "with
This occurs many times within this policy. Begin t
definition of the species of specialloca' conce
policy.
b) (1) Replace in third line the word "obse
c) (2) (a) (ii) Replace the words "directly obse
d) (2) (a) (ii) (a) remove the refere ce to "parks" i
26) Policy 5.6:
a) (3)(f)(iv) End sentence after the
27) Policy 5.7:
a) Strengthen outdo
regulations sh
Sky (www.da
c species of special local concern.
n language of this policy with a
t acronym throughout the
approval of this policy LDC
rds modeled from the Dark
~.....2
AL~ ~.9l"MlTIliiJ!!1:: ,,'..'~ . ~SIONS
TO IMPROVE THE RtJItAl; 1'I . sfil! ~MW~'.AREA OVERLAY
Preface
Section 2 of this Report includes the full RLSA Overlay Program as evaluated. The Review
Committee determined that most of the policies in the RLSA Overlay did not require an
amendment so often took action to "leave policy unchanged." Those policies that were amended,
including those set forth in Section 1, and those with minor tal age corrections, are shown
below with stFib tkreugh and underlines.
In addition to all RLSA text, the following are attached wi
)- Stewardship Overlay Map
>> Attachment A - Stewardship Credit Worksh
>> Attachment B - Land Use Layers MatTi
};> Attachment C - Stewardship Receiving
s
of residents and property
ry the Collier County Rural
goal is to pF64eet retain land
compatible uses away from wetlands and
itat connectivity, to enable the conversion
cations, to discourage urban sprawl, and
ent t emDlovs creative land use planning
the use of established incentives.
dment)
.bed aD , Collier County's objective is to create an incentive based land
ein referred to as the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area
inciples of rural land stewardship as defined in Chapter 163.3177(11),
ill implement this Goal and Objective are set forth below in groups
fthe Goal. Group I policies describe the structure and organization of the
I Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. Group 2 policies relate to agriculture.
Group 3 policl elate to natural resource protection; fffiEt Group 4 policies relate to conversion
of land to other uses and economic diversification. Group 5 are regulatory policies that ensure
that land that is not voluntarily included in the Overlay by its owners shall nonetheless meet the
minimum requirements of the Final Order pertaining to natural resource protection.
Group 1 - General purpose and structure of the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship
Area Overlay
Policy 1.1
To promote a dynamic balance of land uses in the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area
(RLSA) that collectively contribute~ to a viable agricultural industry, protect~ natural resources,
11 P age
and enhance~ economic prosperity and diversification, Collier County hereby establishes the
Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (Overlay). The Overlay was created through a
collaborative community::based planning process involving county residents, area property
owners, and representatives of community and governmental organizations under the direction of
a citizen oversight committee.
Policy 1.2
The Overlay protects natural resources and retains viable agriculture by promoting compact rural
mixed-use development as an alternative to low-density single use development, and provides a
system of compensation to private property owners for the eli ion of certain land uses in
order to protect natural resources and viable agriculture in e., e for transferable credits that
can be used to entitle such compact development. The str' herein are based in part on the
principles of Florida's Rural Lands Stewardship Act, . 3177(11) F.S, The Overlay
includes innovative and incentive based tools, techni ue d stra that are not dependent on
a regulatory approach, but will complement exist" cal, regional, and federal regulatory
programs.
Policy].3
all be no change to the underlying density and
SA, as set forth in the Baseline Standards, as
less and until a operty owner elects to utilize the provisions of the
It is the intent of the Overlay that a property owner will be
stewardship and protection of important agricultural and natural
'on to property owner shall occur through one of the following
d trans r of Stewardship Credits, acquisition of conservation easements,
e interest in the land, or through other acquisition of land or interest in
ler program.
As referred to in these Overlay policies, Baseline Standards are the permitted uses, density,
intensity and other land development regulations assigned to land in the RLSA by the GMP
Growth Manal!ement Plan (GMP), Collier County land Development Regulations and Collier
County Zoning Regulations in effect prior to the adoption of Interim Amendments and Interim
Development Provisions referenced in Final Order AC-99-002. The Baseline Standards will
remain in effect for a111and not subject to the transfer or receipt of Stewardship Credits, except as
provided for in Group 5 Policies. No part of the Stewardship Credit System shall be imposed
upon a property owner without that &WflefS owner's consent.
2lPage
Policy 1.6 (recommended amendment)
Stewardship Credits (Credits) are created from any lands within the RLSA that are to be kept in
permanent agriculture, open space or conservation uses. These lands will be identified as
Stewardship Sending Areas or SSAs. All privately owned lands within the RLSA are a candidate
for designation as a SSA. Land becomes designated as a SSA upon petition by the property owner
seeking such designation and the adoption of a resolution by the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners (BCC), which acknowledges the property owner's request for such designation
and assigns Stewardship Credits or other compensation to the owner for such designation. Collier
County will update the Overlay Map to delineate the bounda "es of each approved SSA.
Designation as an SSA shall be administrative and shall not req amendment to the Growth
Management Plan, but shall be retroactively incorporated in dopted Overlay Map during
the EAR based amendment process when it periodically Stewardship Sendine- Area
Credit Agreement shall be developed that identifies thos esidential densities and other
land uses which remain. Once land is designated as or other compensation is
granted to the owner, no increase in density or ed in the Stewardship
Sendim! Area Credit Agreement shall be allow SSA is terminated
as orovided elsewhere herein.
I.
en assilmed to entitle an aooroved Stewardshio
as received all necessarY final and non-aooealable
other discretion a rovals necess to commence
divi ion lat and site evelo ment Ian a roval but not buildin
from the SSA have been as i ed to more than one SRA then the
o . nental final and non-aooealable develooment orders oennits. or
ovals necess to commence construction of any SRA shan automatically
Stewardshi Easement to become a PeJmanent Stewardshi Easement.
2.
A lands has sold or transferred an Stewardshi Credits to another erson or
Stewardshio Credit Trust as described in Policy 1.20. the cJosinl! has occurred.
as received the consideration due from such sale or transfer. but not exoresslv
(a) a sale or transfer of the Stewardshio Credits ancillary to the sale or transfer of the underlvim~
fee title to the land. or
(b) instances where a landowner establishes an SSA for a soecific SRA. whether the SRA is
owned or develoned by a seoarate or related entity, and the Stewardshio Credits are
transferred as reauired by the Growth Mana~ernent Plan or Land Develooment Code for SRA
aooroval' or
3lPage
3. The owner of the SSA lands has received in exchanlle. for the creation of the Stewardshi[l
Easement AJ!feement other comoensation from local state. federal or novate revenues
(collectivelv the "Events").
The LDC shall snecifv how. assuminll a Notice of Termination (as hereafter described) has not
been recorded the Conditional Stewardshio Easement shall automaticallv convert to a Permanent
Stewardshio Easement unon the earliest to occur of (a) anv of the foree:oinll Events durim' the
Conditional Period or (h) 180 davs after the last dav of the Conditional Period. as and to the
extent extended hereunder. In the event that none of the forelloine: events has occurred durinll the
Conditional Period then the owner fthe SSA I ds ma withi da s after the last da of the
Conditional Period terminate the Conditional Stewardshi nt b recordin a Notice of
Termination. In addition if a challen e and/or a eal of sa develo ment order ermit
or other discretion a rav is filed the owner 0 la ds ma elect to extend the
Conditional Period until the challenl!e or anneal is fi J the challen e or a eal is
not resolved su h that the construction ma co 'e table to the owner ofthe
SSA lands the owner of the SSA lands ma.1l IDal dis osition of the
chaIlen e or a eal record a Notice of T 'on. U n the ree of such Notice of
Termination, the Slewardshi E ement ent and corres ondin Ste i Sendin Area
Credit A reet ent shall ex ire d termi e Steward Credits mera the SSA shall
cease to exist the ri hts and obli ations shin ward hi Eas en shall no Ion er
constitute an encumbrance on the ro ert SA Memorandum shall be revised
accordin I . The owner of the A lands shall co of the Notice of Tennination to the
County.
used to obtain one or more SRA
the Conditional Period then the
an SRAs that have been assi ed
sufficient Stewardshi Credits from
have b a lied to the SRA. In th event that a
the owner of lhe SRA lands shall 'oin in the Notice
asement is terminated all benefits ri ts rivile es
i ns associated th the SSA shall be null and void and the land hall
zonin c sification free and clear of an encumbrance from the
'e.ment and SSA Credit Ae:reement. If reauested bv the owner of the
Coun the other rantees under the Stewardshio Easement Allfeement
1 releas and termination of easement and credit al!Teements for recordinll in
hin 15 da s of r uest from the owner of the SSA lands. Collier County
ma to reflect the termination of anv SSA or SRA.
im lemented in the LDC within 12 m:mths after ado tion hereof.
For SSA's a roved rior to this Polic 1.6.1 bein ado ted but have not chan ed"
ownershic in whole or cart since the creation of the SSA and have not transferred. sold
or utilized credits aenerated from the SSA the orocertv owner mav withdraw the SSA
desianation orovided such withdrawal is imclemented within 6 months of the adootion of
this Policv 1.6.1.
4lPage
r.-~-"---'---~
l!ormatted: Inden~:. Left: 0.5", First Ij~
Policy 1.7 (recommended amendment)
The range of Stewardship Credit Values is hereby established using the specific methodology set
forth on the Stewardship Credit Worksheet (Worksheet), incorporated_herein as Attachment A.
This methodology and related procedures for SSA designation will also be adopted as part of the
Stewardship Overlay District in the Collier County Land 0 ment Code (LDC). Such
procedures shaH include but fie not be limited to the followi! II Credit transfers shall be
recorded with the Collier County Clerk of Courts; (2) a cov perpetual restrictive easement
shall also be recorded for each SSA, shall run WIth t shall be in favor of Collier
County and the Florida Fish and Wildlife C n ission, DeJ'laftmeHt sf
Protection D artment of A culture and C
District. or a reco2:nized statewide land t
Area Credit Agreement will identify the
undertaken and the party responsible for such m
Policy 1.8
nt of Environmental
ter Mana2:ement
dship Sending
that will be
asured by the Stewardship Natural
established the relative natural
hara sties of land and assigning an
ix factors is the index value for the
ors assign hereto were established after review
natural resource attributes of land within the RLSA
y from important natural resources, The six
ay Designation, Sending Area Proximity, Listed
Potential, and Land Use/Land Cover.
ap Series (Index Map Series) indicates the Natural Resource
land within the RLSA. Credits from any lands designated as
n the ral Resource Index values in effect at the time of designation.
cteristics of land due to alteration of the land prior to the establishment
eases or decreases any Index Factor will result in an adjustment of the
sponding adjustment in the credit value. The Index and the Index Map
art of the RLSA Overlay
Policy 1.10
In SSAs, the greater the number of uses eliminated from the property, and the higher the natural
resource value of the land, the higher the priority for protection, the greater the level of Credits
that are generated from such lands, and therefore the greater the incentive to participate in the
Stewardship Credit System and protect the natural resources of the land.
Policy 1.11
The Land Use Matrix, Attachment B, lists uses and activities allowed under the A, Rural
Agricultural Zoning District within the Overlay. These uses are grouped together in one of eight
separate layers in the Matrix. Each layer is discrete and shall be removed sequentially and
5lPage
nFOrmatted: Font: (Default) Times New --I
.~man,.NotStrikethro~~___.~
cumulatively in the order presented in the Matrix, starting with the residential layer (layer one)
and ending with the conservation layer (layer eight). If a layer is removed, all uses and activities
in that layer are eliminated and are no longer available. Each layer is assigned a percentage of a
base credit in the Worksheet. The assigned percentage for each layer to be removed is added
together and then multiplied by the Index value on a per acre basis to arrive at a total Stewardship
Credit Value of the land being designated as a SSA.
Policy 1.12
Credits can be transferred nnly to lands withm the RLSA that ffi#eet the defined suitability_criteria
and standards set forth in Group 4 Policies. Such lands shall be ..' as Stewardship Receivmg
Areas or SRAs. "jr,:.""'''' .
',..1;,.
Policy 1.13
The procedures for the establislunent and
herein and will also be adopted as a part of a
creating the District will be adopted within on
amendment.
are set forth
r non-residential entitlements in
wardship density and intensity
ent or use of Stewardship Credits
adoption of a resolution by the Collier County
ving the petition by the property owner seeking
ge in the reSl 131 density or non-residential intensity of land use on
'thin a SRA shall be specified in the resolution reflecting the total
. assigned to the parcel of land. Density and intensity within the
be increased beyond the Baseline Standards except through the
dship ~dit System, the Affordable-workforce Housing Density Bonus
. ity Rating System of the FLUE, and the density and intensity blending
ee Area Master Plan.
Policy I.
Stewardshi Areas will accommodate uses that utilize creative land use planning
techniques an edits shall be used to facilitate the implementation of innovative and flexible
development strategies described in Chapter 163.3177 (II), F.S. and 91-5.006(5)(1).
Policy 1.17
Stewardship Credits may be transferred between different parcels or within a single parcel,
subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of these policies. Residential clustering shall
only occur within the RLSA through the use of the Stewardship Credit System, and other forms
of residential clustering shall not be permitted.
Policy L18
6lPage
A blend of Local, State, Federal and private revenues, such as but not limited to Florida Forever,
Federal and State conservation and stewardship programs, foundation grants, private conservation
organizations, local option taxes, general county revenues, and other monies can augment the
Stewardship program through the acquisition of conservation easements, Credits, or land that is
identified as the highest priority for natural resource protection, including, but is not limited to,
areas identified on the Overlay Map as Flow way Stewardship Areas (FSAs), Habitat Stewardship
Areas (HSAs), Water Retention Areas (WRAs) and land within the Big Cypress Area of Critical
State Concern (ACSC).
Policy 1.19
All local land or easement acquisition programs that are i
Overlay shall be based upon a willing participant/seller a
County to use eminent domain acquisition within this s~
to work within the RLSA
It is not the intent of Collier
Policy 1.20
The County may elect to acquire Credit
identified in Policy 1.18. Should the Count
Credit Trust to receive and hold Credits until s
used to implement uses within St rdship Receiv
using sources
.ected demand for Credits As!lli
flowways, habitats and water
k of significant demand for Credits
recognizes at a public benefit would be realized
this issue and to promote the protection of natural
ill include an early entry bonus to encourage the
LSA. The bonus shall be in the fonn of an
o and designated as a HSA located outside of the
rdship Cre acre of land designated as HSA located inside the
nus shall be available for five years from the effective date of the
Credit System in the LDC. The early designation of SSAs, and
s, habitats, and Water retention areas does not require the
r othe e require the early use of Credits, and Credits generated under
ay be used after the tennination of the bonus period. The maximum
n be generated under the bonus is 27,000 Credits, and such Credits shall
used within the ACSC.
ended amendment)
The RLSA Ov ay was designed to be a long-tenn strategic plan with a planning horizon Year of
2025. Many of the tools, techniques and strategies of the Overlay are new, Innovative, incentive
based, and have yet to be tested in actual implementation. A comprehensive review of the
Overlay shall be prepared for and reviewed by Collier County and the Department of Community
Affairs HfJ0n the H. e :-, ear B.ani, ersaF/ €If the aasJ3tisn €If the Ste (. anlskip Distriet in the LDC. ~
Dart of the Evaluation and Aooraisal Reoort orocess. The purpose of the review shall be to assess
the participation in and effectiveness of the Overlay implementation in meeting the Goal,
Objective and Policies set forth herein. The specific measures of review shall be as follows:
I. The amount and location of land designated as FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and other SSAs.
2. The amount and location of land designated as SRAs.
7lPage
3. The number of Stewardship Credits generated, assigned or held for future use.
4. A comparison of the amount, location and type of Agriculture that existed at the time
ofa Study and time of review.
5. The amount, location and type of land converted to non-agricultural use with and
without participation in the Stewardship Credit System since its adoption.
6. The extent and use of funding provided by Collier County and other sources Local,
State, Federal and private revenues described in Policy 1.18.
7. The amount, location and type of restoration through participation in the Stewardship
Credit System since its adoption.
8. The potential for use of Credits in urban areas.
Group 2 - Policies to
&lid retain land for a riculturaJ activities t rou h
12 continue the viability of agricultural productio
Stewardship Area Overlay. (Recommended am
f Stewardship Credits shall be designated as
ed in Policy 1.6. The protection measures for SSAs
I. 7, .LlQ, and 1.17. In addition to Drotectim~ al!riculture activities in
WRA as further described in Policies 3.1 3.2 and 3.3 additional
'culture within 0 en Lands as an alternative to conversion of
e Sta ds as described in Polic 1.5. en Lands are those lands not
A HSA FSA or ublic lands on the Rural Lands Stewardshi Area
4-b- Therefore in lieu ofusinll the
on land desil!nated Ooen these lands shall be assilltled two (2.0)
r acre outside of the Area of Critical State Concern ( ACSC). and two and
redits er acr within the ACSC or n Lands detennined to be orimarv
Danlher habitat. II non-allriculture uses shall be removed and the remaininl1' uses are limited to
al!r:iculture Land Use Levels 5. 6 and 7 on the Land Use Matrix. Each laver is discreet and shall
be removed seauentiallv and cumulativelv in the order oresented in the Matrix. If a laver is
removed _all uses and activities in that laver are eliminated and no IOnizer available. Followim~
anoroval of an Al!r:icultural SSA Collier County shall uodate the RLSA ZOni"ll Overlav District
MaD to delineate the boundaries of the Alrricultural SSA.
palie) 2.3 (ruammended deletiaH)policv 2.3
8lPage
=---~--~
l ~~rmatted: Not Strikethrough
WithiH SAe (1) ) ear Hem. the effeeti. e €late Elf these amenameAts, Callier Cal:lAtl '," il]
estaelish aft Agfis\:tlRire :\a,ise~ CSI:IReil eSH1flflsea sf Het less th8H fi,e Her mere thaH ruBe
aflflsiAted reJ3FeseHtati es sf the agriel:llt\:lre iHaustf), te aeLise the BCC eR matters relatiRg ts
,\gFieI:lIRtf.e. The :\.grie\:lltl:lre :\.d.is8r.} CSl:lneil (.\,\C) ..ill SA;: ta iElelltif) Sflfl8FNHities 1ffi.8
prej'l8re stFategies ta eRRaRee ana pFsmste tRe eSRtiH\:IBRSe, eJLflBRSiaR BHa lOti .ersifieatiaH sf
agflE\:Ilrure iR Callier CSI:IRf). The :\/.C ..ill alse ideRtif) samel's te the ESRtiR\:Iaase, 8JtflBRsieR
aRlOt lOti.efsifieatisn sf the agFieultl:lfal iRlOt\:lstF/ aRa ",ill )'lf8JlBre reeemmendBtisBS ts elimiRate sr
miRiaH:le SI:lSfl bafflers ia Callier CSI:lRt). The :\,'\C "ill a]ss assess het1.er eHsefltisRs ff6m
)'lefRlit )'lrasess aHa ma}(e reeemmefllOtatisfls ta the BCe.
With(n one ( I) ve~r fr m the effective d te of th
establish an Amculture Advisorv Council com rised
a ointed re resent tiv s of the a 'c Iture i dust
Amculture. The A riculture Advi Cou cil
re are strate . es to enhance and romote t
a2riculture in Collier County. The AAC wil
and diversification of the alrricultural indu
minimize such barriers in Collier Count .
standards for business uses related to a ricu
vennit process and make recom ations to the_
ments Colli r Count will
an five nor more than nine
on m Uers relatin to
tif 0 ortunities and
diversification of
uance ex ansion
o eliminate or
ceotions from
administrative
aati,ities.
of the AAC and facilitate the im lementation of
ACC that are determined to be a ro riate. The
at implement policies that SUDPort alZriculture
ndment)
ant as of Collier County's quality of life and economic well-being.
all be protected from duplicative regulation as provided by the Florida
ended amendment)
special provisions of Policies 3.9 and 3.lO, nothing herein or in the
implementing Rs, shall restrict lawful agricultural activities on lands within the RLSA that
have not been placed into the Stewardship program.
Group 3 - Policies to protect water quality and quantity and maintain the natural water
regime, as well as listed animal and plant species and their hahitats by directing
incompatible uses away from wetlands and uplaDd habitat through the establishment of
Flow way Stewardship Areas, Habitat Stewardship Areas, and Water Retention Areas,
where lands are voluntarily included in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area program,
9lPage
I Formatted: Not Striketh~r~~~~~~
r----".-----.--- -- ---.------.
formatted:_ Not?~~jketh~~U9h,,_._______=J
Policy 3.1
Protection of water quality and quantity, and the maintenance of the natural water regime shall
occur through the establishment of Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs), as SSAs within the
RLSA Overlay. FSAs are delineated on the Overlay Map and contain approximately 31,100
acres. FSAs are primarily privately owned wetlands that are located within the Camp Keais
Strand and Okaloacoochee Slough. These lands fonn the primal)' wetland flowway systems in
the RLSA. The Overlay provides an incentive to pennanently protect FSAs by the creation and
transfer of Credits, elimination of incompatible uses, and establishment of protection measures
described in Group I Policies. Not all lands within the delineated SAs are comparable in terms
of their natural resource value; therefore the index shall be used erentiate higher value from
lower value lands for the purpose of Overlay implementation sis of the Index Map Series
shows that FSA lands score within a range of 0.7 to 2.4; . tely 96% score greater than
1.2 while 4% score 1.2 or less. The average Index score" - 's 1.8.
ter quality and quantity shall be through the establishment of
WRAs, s SSAs within the RLSA Overlay. WRAs are delineated on the
approximately 18,200 acres. WRAs are privately owned lands that have
uth Florida Water Management District to function as agricultural water
instances, these WRAs consist of native wetland or upland vegetation; in
excavated water bodies or may contain exotic vegetation. The Overlay
lve to permanently protect WRAs by the creation and transfer of Credits,
elimination of i compatible uses, and establishment of protection measures described in Group I
Policies. Not all lands within the delineated WRAs are comparable in terms of their natural
resource value; therefore the index shall be used to differentiate higher value from lower value
lands for the purpose of Overlay implementation. Analysis of the Index Map Series shows that
WRA lands score within a range of 0.6 to 2.4; approximately 74% score greater than 1.2 while
26% score 1.2 or less. The average Index score ofWRA land is 1.5.
Policy 3.4
10 I P age
Public and private conservation areas exist in the RLSA and serve to protect natural resources.
Corkscrew Marsh and Okaloacoochee Slough State Forest include approximately 13,500 acres.
Analysis shows that they score within an Index range of 0.0 to 2.2; with an average Index score of
1.5. Because these existing public areas, and any private conservation areas, are already
protected, they are not delineated as SSAs and are not eligible to generate Credits, but do serve an
important role in meeting the Goal of the RLSA.
Policy 3.5
Residential uses, General Conditional uses, Earth Mining and Proc
Uses (layers 1-4) as listed in the Matrix shall be ehmin
compensation to the property owner as described in Policy 3.
and governmental essential services, other than those ne
public safety, shall only be allowed in FSAs with a Na
1.2 or less. Where practicable, directional-drillin
disturbed areas shall be utilized for oil and gas ext
native habitats. Other layers may also be eli
exchange for compensation. The eliminati
excavation of lakes or other water bodi
mitigation program within a FSA.
ssing Uses, and Recreational
.n FSAs in exchange for
ditiona1 use essential services
to serve permitted uses or for
Stewardship Index value of
or previously cleared or
to mi nimize impacts to
property owner in
not preclude the
restoration or
Policy 3.6
Residential Land Uses listed in
Areas in exchange for compens
layers may also be eliminated at th
ated in Habitat Stewardship Sending
as described in Policy 3.8. Other
r in exchange for compensation.
rocessing ses, and Recreational Uses shall be
Resource Stewardship Index value of 1.2 or less.
ental essential services, other than those necessary
hall only be allowed in HSAs with a Natural
. Asphaltic and concrete batch making plants are
here prac directional-drilling techniques and/or previously
shall be utilized for oil and gas Extraction in HSAs in order to
abitats. In addition to the requirements imposed in the LDC for
such uses will only be approved upon submittal of an :H&
EIS which demonstrates that clearing of native vegetation has
will not significantly and adversely impact listed species and their
ot significantly and adversely impact aquifers. As an alternative to the
may demonstrate that such use is an integral part of an approved
n program. Golf Course design, construction, and operation in any HSA
shall compl e best management practices of Audubon International's Gold Program and
the Florida De timent of Environmental Protection. Compliance with the following standards
shall be considered by Collier County as meeting the requirement for minimization of impact:
. Clearing of native vegetation shaH not exceed 15% of the native vegetation on
the parcel.
. Areas previously cleared shall be used preferentially to native vegetated areas.
. Buffering to Conservation Land shall comply with Policy 4.13.
Policy 3.7 (recom
General Condit"
allowed anI
Conditiona
to serve pe
Resource Stewa
Policy 3.8
Compensation to the property owner may occur through one or more of the following
mechanisms: creation and transfer of Stewardship Credits, acquisition of conservation easements,
11lPage
acquisition of less than fee interest in the land, or t!trough other acquisition of land or interest in
land through a willing seller program.
Policy 3.9 (recommended amendment)
1. Agriculture will continue to be a permitted use and its supporting activities will continue
to be permitted as conditional uses within FSAs and HSAs, pursuant to the Agriculture
Group classifications described in the Matrix. The Ag I group includes row crops, citrus,
specialty farms, horticulture, plant nurseries, improved pastures for grazing and ranching,
aquaculture flimited to Onen Land desil:!nation onlvl an similar activities, including
related agricultural support uses. In existing Ag I areas n FSAs and HSAs, all such
activities are permitted to continue, and may con one type of Agriculture to
another and expand to the limits allowed by app ermits. Once the Stewardship
Credit System is utilized and an owner receives. as previously described, no
further expansion of Ag I will be allowe SAs beyond existing or
pennitted limits within property subject t for incidental clearing
as set forth in Paragraph 2 below.
2.
. i ty to convert
g Ag 1 areas,
ve p res for grazing and ranching, forestry and similar activities,
ural support uses. In existing Ag 2 areas within FSAs and HSAs, such
continue, and may convert from one type of Agriculture to another and
owed by applicable permits. Once the Stewardship Credit System is
eceives compensation as previously described, no further expansion of Ag
g 2 to Ag I will be allowed in FSAs or HSAs beyond existing or permitted
erty subject to a credit transfer.
Policy 3.11 (recommended amendment)
L In certain locations there may be the opportunity for flow-way or habitat restoration. Examples
include, but are not limited to, locations where flow-ways have been constricted or otherwise
impeded by past activities, or where additional land is needed to enhance wildlife corridors.
PrieR1=) shall Be gi', eft ta Festeratiaft .. iiliiR the CafHJ3 Keais StFaRa PSI. sr 68fttigue1:is 1IS.~.s.
Should a property owner be willing to dedicate land for restoration activities within a FSA or
HSA tlie Caffi)3 Keais Stfantt FSf. sr eSftti,g;lJ8H3 HS.~.s, fellT two additional Stewardship Credits
shall be assigned for each acre ofland so dedicated. .^.A aaftitieHBI tus Ste\.Br63h.i)3 ereaitrl shall
12 I P age
be assigned fer eaeh aere sf hmd deaieatea ror resteratien aeti. ities ..Hhin ether FS.~.!3 8n€llIS,A,s.
The actual implementation of restoration improvements is not required for the owner to receive
such credits and the costs of restoration shall be borne by the governmental agency or private
entity undertaking the restoration. Should an owner also complete restoration improvements, this
shall be rewarded with fettt= additional Credits for each acre of restored land upon demonstration
that the restoration met applicable success criteria as detennined by the permit agency authorizing
said restoration. The additional Credits shall be rewarded for either caracara ,restoration at 2
Credits oer acre. or for exotic controllburnin~ at 4 Credits oer acre or for flow wav restoration at
4 Credits ner acre or for native habitat restoration at 6 Credits er ere. Within the area ro osed
for restoration. Land Use Lavers 1-6 must be removed. The s rocess for assi ent of
additional restoration Credits shall be included in the Stew trict of the LDC.
2. In certain locations as ~enerally illustrated
oODortunities to create restore and enhance a n
southern anther corridor cOlUlection. Should a
u ose of establishin and maintainin the n
Stewardshin Credits shall be assilmed for e
ma be
corridor is
b the land
f seasonal shallow wetland wadin
be incentivized in t e RLSAO.
sonal w tland restoration shall
_ the restoration. and additional 6 Credits oer acre
with these Credits for each acre desi ated for
e other forms of compensation for restoration which may be
e partnership agreement such as a developer contribution
agre nt between the parties involved. Also not orecluded are various
ded restoration TO rams such as the federal Farm Bill conservation
rocess for assignment of additional restoration credits shall be included
ct of the LOC.
Policy 3.12
Based on the a and analysis of the Study, FSAs, HSAs, WRAs, and existing public/private
conservation land include the land appropriate and necessary to accomplish the Goal pertaining to
natural resource protection. To further direct other uses away from and to provide additional
incentive for the protection, enhancement and restoration of the Okaloacoochee Slough and Camp
Keais Strand, all land within 500 feet of the delineated FSAs that comprise the Slough or Strand
that is not otherwise included in a HSA or WRA shall receive the same natural index score (0.6)
that a HSA receives if such property is designated as a SSA and retains only agricultural,
recreational and/or conservation layers within the matrix.
Policy 3.13 (recommended amendment)
13 I P age
[R;~atted: Indent: Left: O.75:_,__~
Water Retention Areas (WRAs) as generally depicted on the Overlay Map have been permitted
for this purpose and will continue to function for surface water retention, detention, treatment
and/or conveyance, in accordance with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
permits applicable to each WRA. WRAs can also be permitted to provide such functions for new
uses of land allowed within the Overlay. WRAs may be incorporated into a SRA master plan to
provide water management functions for properties within such SRA, but are not required to be
designated as a SRA in such instances. However. if the WRA orovides water treatment and
retention enellfsi. el. for a SM. the acrea!!e of the WRA used as water manaeement for the SRA
shall be included in the SRA. WRA boundaries are understood 1.0. ~. i approximate and are subject
to refinement in accordance With SFWMD pennitting. ..:"'/;!?
Policy 3.14
er uses in appropriate locations,
ent that utilizes creative land
eceiving Areas.
ate uses that enable economic prosperity and
RLSA. Collier County will also encourage
'ng techniques and facilitates a compact fonn of
te popu th by the establisrunent of Stewardship Receiving
to encourage an support the diversification and vitality of the rural
velopment regulations, expedited permitting review, and targeted
porporated into the LDC Stewardship District.
"lj'~<
d amendment)
nds within the RLSA which meet the criteria set forth herein are eligible
for designat SRA, except land delineated as a FSA, HSA, WRA or land that has been
designated as a tewardship Sending Area. Land proposed for SRA designation shall meet the
suitability criteria and other standards described in Group 4 Policies. Due to the long-tenn vision
of the RLSA Overlay, extending to a horizon year of 2025, and in accordance with the guidelines
established in Chapter 163 .3177( II) F.S., the specific location, size and composition of each SRA
carolOt and need not be predetermined in the GMP. 10 the RLSA Overlay, lands that are eligible
to be designated as SRAs generally have similar physical attributes as they consist predominately
of agriculture lands which have been cleared or otherwise altered for this pwpose. Lands shown
on the Overlay Map as eligible for SRA designatIOn include approximately ~ 72 000 acres
outside of the ACSC and aDDroximatelv .J..8.,3-OO 15.000 acres within the ACSC. Total SRA
desimation shall be a maximum creation of 315.000 stewardshio credits ef 15099 aefes.
14lPage
,'\pflHmimslely 2~-:' sflkese 18fl.~s aeRie.s an Inde" seere greater than 1.2. Because the Overlay
requires SRAs to be compact, mixed-use and self sufficient in the provision of services, facilities
and infrastructure, traditional locational standards normally applied to determine development
suitability are not relevant or applicable to SRAs. Therefore the process for designating a SRA
follows the flA8eiflles sf the Rliral LIlfl~s Ste..afElskip :\et as further EleseFiee~ orocedures set
forth herein and the adoDted RLSA Zoninll Overlav District.
Policy 4.3 (recommended amendment)
Land becomes designated as a SRA upon petition by a property ow
such designation and the adoption of a resolution by the Be
petition shall include a SRA master plan as described in Polt
be a finding of consistency with the policies of the Overla .'
set forth herein, compliance with the LDe Stewardship
has acquired or will acquire sufficient Stewardship -or
er to Collier County seeking
fiting the designation. The
. The basis for approval shall
ing required suitability criteria
assurance that the applicant
ot the SRA uses. Witfltn:
IUS, isiens fsr eS85iEleratisn af iffiflsets,
. 'iJ3atisn in aHY
Policy 4.4
Collier County will update the
Such updates shall not require
retroactively incorporated into th
process when it periodically occurs.
er plan of each SRA will be prepared and submitted
or designation as a SRA. The master plan will
plicable policies of the Overlay and the LDC
a compatible land uses are directed away from
at identi Ie :As and HSAs on the Overlay Map. Te tke 81;te8t
er Plan shall Be 6s8sistentcom Iv with the County's then-adooted
LRTP the Count Build Out Vision Plan_!!,~ may be amended
Jhe Future TransDortation Element. and Access Manal!ement
all include a Mana ement Plan with rovisions for minimizin human
,os. UlW intensit land uses e. arks assive recreation areas oIf
tion reservation re uirements indudin a 'culture shall be used to
establish buf~ reas between wil life habitat re s and area dominate b human activities.
Consideration shall be !liven to the most current ruidelines and rerulations on techniaues to
reduce human wildlife conflict. The manallement oJans shall also reauire the dissemination of
information to local residents. businesses and Q:overnmental services about the Dfesence of
wildlife and oractices(such as aoorooriate waste disoosal methods) that enable resoonsible
coexistence with wildlife while minimizinl! oODortunities for nellative interaction.
15lPage
Policy 4.6
SRA characteristics shall be based upon innovative planning and development strategies
referenced in Chapter 163.3177 (11), F.S. and 9J-5.006(5)(I). These planning strategies and
techniques include urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based allocations,
clustering and open space provisions, and mixed-use development that allow the conversion of
rural and agricultural lands to other uses while protecting environmentally sensitive areas,
maintaining the economic viability of agricultural and other predominantly rural land uses, and
providing for the cost-efficient delivery of public facilities and services. The SRA shall also
include a mobility ulan that includes consideration of vehicular b. lei edestrian ublic transit
internal circulators and other modes of travel/movement with. etween SRAs and areas of
outside develooment and land uses. The mobili Ian shal Ide mobilitv strate~es such as
bus subsidies route soonsorshio or other incentives w ra e the use of mass transit
services. The develonment of SRAs shall also conside. tified in the Count Build
Out Vision Plan and olan land uses to accommodat .ncrease internal caoture
and reduce tri len h and Ion distance travel. "es are recognized as
methods of discouraging urban sprawb-----> of transoortation
increasin internal ca ture and reducin ve
,thin the Overlay. These are Towns,
eRn). The Characteristics of Towns,
t C and are generally described in
.s.pecific
District te guide the design and
ev opment strategies as set forth in
base density of each fonn shall be
chInent C. The maximum base residential density
eeded through the density blending process as set
of the Immokalee Area Master Plan or through
as referenced in the Density Rating System of
ential density is calculated by dividing the total
in a SRA by t 1 verall area therein. The base residential density does
.sity of parcels within a SRA. The location, size and density of each
individual basis during the SRA designation review and approval
~'.
ded amendment)
most diverse form of SRA, with a full range of housing types and mix
ban level services and infrastructure that support development that is
uman scale, and provides a balance of land uses to reduce automobile trips
and increase ity. Towns shall be not less than -H1OO 1.500 acres or more than 4;00(} 5.000
acres and are comprised of several villages and/or neighborhoods that have individual identity
and character. Towns shall have a mixed-use town center that will serve as a focal point for
community facilities and support services. Towns shall be designed to encourage pedestrian and
bicycle circulation by mcluding an interconnected sidewalk and pathway system serving all
residential neighborhoods. Towns and villalZes llreater than ~OO acres shall include an internal
mobility Dlan which shall include a transfer station or Dark ;lnd ride area that is aDoronriatelv
located within the town to serve the connection Doint for internal and external oubhc
transDortation. Towns shall have at least one community park with a minimum size of 200 square
feet per dwelling unit in the Town.
16 I P age
Towns shall also have parks or public green spaces within neighborhoods. Towns shall include
both community and neighborhood scaled retail and office uses, ifl.-.a.-.t:ati as ~ described
in Policy 4:H 4.15.1. Towns may also include those compatible corporate office. research.
develooment comnanies and light industrial uses such as those pennitted in the Business Park
and Research and Technology Park Subdistricts of the FLUE~and those included in Policy 4.7.4.
Towns shall be the preferred location for the full range of schools, and to the extent possible,
schools and parks shall be located abutting each other to allow for the sharing of recreational
facilities and as orovicted in Policies 4.15.2 and 4.15.3. Design criteria for Towns are ~
included in the LDC Stewardship District. Towns shaH not be 10C.~~.t..,~ within the ACSC.
Policy 4.7.2 (recommended amendment) -j~~'
ci;~"j
Villages are primarily residential communities with a dive.:'.-H.( housing types and mix of uses
appropriate to the scale and character of the particular v. es shall be not less than 100
acres or more than 1,000 acres inside the Area of Cri .c and not more than 1 500
acres outside the Area of Critical State Cone prised of residential
neighborhoods and shall include a mixed-use focal point for the
community's support services and facilities. urage pedestrian
and bicycle circulation by including an in em serving all
residential neighborhoods. Villages shall public green spaces within
neighborhoods. Villages shall include neighbo retail and office uses, in a ratio as
provided in Policy 4.15. AJm( .atel scaled scribed in Policv 4.7.4 shall also be
nermitted in VillalIes. Villages~ propriate I n for a full range of schools. To the
extent possible, schools and park ted adjac each other to allow for the sharing
of recreational facilities. Design c s shal eluded in the LDC Stewardship
District.
aeres Br less, ma) ae al9pffl. ed fer
Policy 4.1.4 -l...- (recommended amendment)
Compact Rural Development (CRD) is a fonn ofSRA that "ill flre.ill!! f.lemisiliPJ ..itk reSfleet
t8 the min sf uses aHa aesign stliHaanis, But shall ether' is!! s8FRfll) .. ith the staRaafEis sf a
Wamlet sr Village. shall SUDDort and further Collier Countv's valued attributes of alZTiculture
natural resources and economic diversity. CRDs shall demonstrate a uniQue set of uses and
SUDoort services necessary to further these attributes within the RLSA. Primarv CRD uses shall
be those associated with and needed to SUDDort research. education convenience re1ID.l.... tourism or
recreation. ,\BBfflBRatel. seal eel eSR..eatible uses aeseFiBfla iR P8~ 1.:.1 ffl8, a1s8 be BfFffiittea
~. A CRD may include, but is not required to have pennanent residential housing" &flt'i-tfle
17 I P age
SBR iees aReI faeiliaes that SH)3pSFl: peHBanent resiaeHts. ...and the se~v_ice~ ~nd factlities thatsuDDort
Dennanent residents. The number of residential units shall be eauivalent with the demand
lZenerated bv the orimarv CRD use but shall not exceed the maximum of two units oer !HOSS acre.
A CRD shall be a maximum size of 100 acres. Afl enaR.J3le sf a CRn is a:FI eestsHRsffi . illage tRat
., sMId he e e HflilJ.He set sf Hsas an.d SHppSFt SElF. iees differsRt frem e tmsitisRel resideRtial
,illaga. It .,eHla esDtain trensisHt leagifl.g faeilities and saLieas apIH8pl'iate t8 eae tSHRStS, BHt
ma) nat pre .ide fer the ran.ga sf sSF.iess that ~ ReeeSS8f) ta 3tipp8f1: peHB8e8nt rasiseHts.
En8eJ'1t as elessRlIea al'ls . e, a eRn .. ill 8SflroHB ts the 8Raraetel'isties sf a YiIlage sr Bamlet as
wns not more
of a VillalZe or
cation for business and industr
and develo ment diversification
SA or HSA, but shall not encroach into such areas, and shall
cribed Policy 4.13. A SRA may be contiguous to and served by a
'he WRA to be designated as a SRA in accordance with Policy 3.12 and
A SRA must contain sufficient suitable land to accommodate the planned development in an
environmentally acceptable manner. The primary means of directing development away from
wetlands and critical habitat is the prohibition of locating SRAs in FSAs, and HSAs, aHa ')/R, '\s.
To further direct development away from wetlands and critical habitat, residential, commercial,
manufacturing/light industrial, group housing, and transient housing, institutional, civic and
community service uses within a SRA shall not be sited on lands that receive a Natural Resource
Index value of greater than 1.2. In addition, conditional use essential services and governmental
essential services, with the exception of those necessary to serve permitted uses and for public
safety, shall not be sited on lands that receive a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2.
18 I P age
r F~;;;'~ltect: Font: Times Ne~-Roman,N~t"-- ~ -1
~iketh~u~h.__ _
--~-_._.- -----~----". ]
Formatted: FQflt: TImes New Roman, Not
Strikethrough
Formatted: Font: TImes New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not
Strikethrough
Formatted: Font: TImes New Roman
Formatted: FQflt: TImes New Roman
Formatted: Font: TImes New Roman, Not
_~~~~~!~.2.h ~~ - -----. ----
Infrastructure necessarv to serve oennitted uses mav be exemnt from this restriction. nrovided
that desi~s seek to minimize the extent of imnacts to anv such areas. The Index value of greater
than 1.2 represents those areas that have a high natural resource value as measured pursuant to
Policy 1.8. Less than 2% of potential SRA land achieves an Index score of greater than 1.2.
Policy 4.10 (recommended amendment)
Within the RLSA Overlay, open space, which by definition shall include public and private
conservation lands, underdeveloped areas of designated SSAs, agriculture, water retention and
management areas and recreation uses, will continue to be the domi ant land use. Therefore, open
space adequate to serve the forecasted population and uses withi 8RA is provided. To ensure
that SRA residents have such areas proximate to their home space shall also comprise a
minimum of thirty-five percent of the gross acreage of an . ual SRA Town, QI Village.,-ef
these CRDs 6JlseefliHg I gg aeres. Lands within a SRA ne acre with Index values of
greater than 1.2 shall be retained as open space: e?: e r t nee of uses escribed in
Policv 4.9. As an incentive to encourage open sp ch uses withl RA, Iseated sutsicle ef
the .~~CSC, exceeding the required thirty-fi rcent shall not uired to consume
Stewardship Creditsj;llJLshaU,~ cOU!J!!t.ciilli. the SRA acrea e.
transition from higher density and
nsity uses on adjoining property. The
be compatible with the character of
setbacks, landscape buffers, and
se. Where existing agricultural
is a ity into account to allow for the
y conflict between agriculture and
r existing public or private conservation land
ent and planning practices shall be applied to
to such Ian design shall demonstrate that ground water table
. 1 not adversely impact the adjacent FSA, HSA, WRA or conservation
levations shall be established to protect such natural areas and be
;md project control elevations and water tables.
~/../\
tiguous to a SRA shall be used to provide a buffer between the SRA and
A, or existing public or private conservation land delineated on the
ace contiguous to or within 300 feet of the boundary of a FSA, HSA, or
rivate conservation land may include: natural preserves, lakes, golf courses
provided no fal ays or other turf areas are allowed within the first 200 feet, passive recreational
areas and parks, required yard and set-back areas, and other natural or man-made open space.
Along the west boundary of the FSAs and HSAs that comprise Camp Keais Strand, i.e., the area
south of Immokalee Road, this open space buffer shall be 500 feet wide and shall preclude golf
course fairways and other turf areas within the first 300 feet.
Policy 4.14 (recommended amendment)
The SRA must have either direct access to a County collector or arterial road or indirect access
via a road provided by the developer that has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed
19 I P age
development in accordance with accepted transportation planning standards. At the time of SRA
anoroval an SRA Dronosed to adioin land desil!nated as an SRA or lands desilffiated as ODen
shall Drovide for the onnortunitv to orovide direct vehicular and nedestrian connections from said
areas to the County's arterial/collector roadwav network as shown on the Countv Build Out
Vision Plan so as to reduce travel time and travel exnenses. imnrove interconnectivity increase
internal canture and keen the use of county arterial roads to a minimum when travelim! between
develonments in the RLSA.
Public and nrivate roads within an SRA shall be maintained bv the aAfRftF. teVlH ar
eSfRHUuHf. SRA it serves. Silffialized intersections within or ad' t to an SRA that serves the
SRA shall be maintained b the It serves. No SRA shall be
approved unless the capacity of County collector or road(s) serving the 8RA is
demonstrated to be adequate in accordance with the Co ty Concurrency Management
System in effect at the time of SRA designation. A tra act assessment meeting the
requirements of Section 2.7.3 of the LDC, or its s s r regulatl all be prepared for each
proposed SRA to provide the necessary data an sis. To the exl uired to miti ate an
SRA's traffic imnacts. actions may be taken t de but shall not be to rovisions for
the construction and/or oermittinl! of wildli sin s environmental rniti credits. ril!ht of
way dedication{s) water manaQ"ement an I mate ia h ma be nee 0 ex and the
existin or ro osed roadwa network. An a to offset traffic imoacts shall be
memorialized in a develo er contribution a eem actions shall be considered within the
area of si 'ficant influence 0 roiect traffic osed .roadwavs~
e allowed full range of uses permitted by the
d by Policies 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.7.2, and 4.7.3.,.4'7-:4 and
iI, office, recreational, civic, governmental, and
e daily needs and community wide needs of
cale, and character of a SRA, such uses may be
_ other SRAs in the RLSA or within the Immokalee
of those ad'oinin area's facilities as described in
b the newlv created SRA can demonstrate sufficient
uses er the standards of Attachment C. By example, each
rovide neighborhood retail/office uses to serve its population as well
'nstitutional uses, however, the combined population of several Villages
, ired to support community scaled retail or office uses in a nearby Town.
urn amount of non~resldential uses in each category are set forth in
I be also included in the Stewardship LDC District.
The Board of County Commissioners (Bee) may, as a condition of approval and adoption of an
SRA development, require that suitable areas for parks, schools, and other public facilities be set
aside, improved, and/or dedicated for public use. When the Bec requires such a set aside for one
or more public facilities, the set aside shall be subject to the same provisions of the LDC as are
applicable to public facility dedications required as a condition for PUD rezoning.
Policy 4.15.3
20lPage
Applicants for SRA designation shall coordinate with Collier County School Board staff to allow
planning to occur to accommodate any impacts to the public schools as a result of the SRA. As a
part of the SRA application, the following infonnation shall be provided:
I. Number of residential units by type;
2. An estimate of the number of school-aged children for each type of school
impacted (elementary, middle, high school); and
3. The potential for locating a public educational facility or fac'lities within the SRA,
and the size of any sites that may be dedicated, or othe ade available
for a public educational facility.
Policy 4.16 (recommended amendment)
velopment, or such
f infrastructure
d civil engine practices, and
rastructure necess ry to serve the
Ignation process. Infrastructure to be
ble water, wastewater, irrigation water,
infrastructure is discussed in Policy
stewater utilities are required in
I gO) Beres in size, and may be
, depending upon the permitted
ecen community water and wastewater
and maintained by a private utility service, the
'ct, the Immokalee Water Sewer Service District,
Innovative alternative water and wastewater
ity treatment systems shall not be prohibited by
Ie regulatory criteria. Individual potable water
stems, limite a maximum of 100 acres of any Town, Village or
ed on an interim basis until services from a centralized/decentralized
e. Individual potable water supply wells and septic systems are
ermitted in CRDs of 100 acres or less in size.
and approve SRA designation applications in accordance with the
of the Capital Improvement Element of the GMP for Category A and
tlities. Final local development orders will be approved within a SRA
C in accordance with the Concurrency Management System of the GMP and
e time affinal local development order approval.
Policy 4.18 (recommended amendment)
The SRA will be planned and designed to be fiscally neutral or positive to Collier County at the
horizon year based on a cost/benefit fiscal impact analysis model acceptable to or as may be
adopted by the County. The BCC may grant exceptions to this policy to accommodate affordable-
workforce housing, as it deems appropriate, Techniques that may promote fiscal neutrality such
as Community Development Districts, and other special districts, shall be encouraged. At a
minimum, the analysis shall consider the following public facilities and services: transportation,
potable water, wastewater, inigation water, stonnwater management, solid waste, parks, law
21 I P age
enforcement, and schools. Development phasing, developer contributions and mitigation, and
other public/private partnerships shall address any potential adverse impacts to adopted levels of
service standards.
It is reesBlizealn the event that a SRA develoDment iH tha RLS/. , includina any related
imoacts to Collier County outside of those directlv aenerated bv the 8RA fl'lftY 2:enerates
surnlus revenues to Collier Countv'-l!flEI Collier Countv mav choose to allocate a Dortion of such
surnlus revenues to ensure that sufficient resources are available to allow Collier Countv to
res and ex editiousl to economic 0 ortunities and to com e e effectivel for hi h-value
research develo ment and commercialization innovation and tive and renewable ener
business proiects. ,,;1.1 .
ere such Credits were
it ratio. Ten Credits
ch Credits were
excess of the
It use shall flat count toward the maximum acreage
t toward the consum tion of Stewardshi Credits.
include: public schools (preK-12) and public or
ncillary uses; community parks exceeding the
nt C, municipal golf courses; regional parks; and
as defined in the LDC. The location of public
with the Collier County School Board, based on the interlocal
a manner consistent with 235.193 F.S. Schools and related
coura to locate in or proximate to Towns, and Villages, ana IIsfI.lets
;ng and permitting requirements.
ed amendment)
that meet all SRA criteria shall also be restricted such that credits used to
ACSC must be generated exclusively from SSAs within the ACSC. Further,
the only form RA allowed in the ACSC east of the OkaJoacoochee Slough shall be Hamlets
-Ili'K4 CRDs of 100 acres or less and the only form of SRA allowed in the ACSC west of the
Okaloacoochee Slough shall be CRDs and Villages sad CRDs of not more than 300 acres -Ili'K4
Hamlets. Provided, not more than 500 acres of SRA develooment in the form of VillaL!es
or CRDs shall not exceed 500 acres As..e.er, that eROs. ar La Villages sr CRDs sf Rat
ffi8fe tAaH 509 aefes eaeh, exclusive of any lakes created prior to tHe effeeti.e aate sf thi:;
ameHelmeHt June 30. 2002 as a result of mining operations, shall be allowed in areas that have a
frontage on State Road 29 and that, as ef tAe effeeti.e elate sf these ameRsmeHts, had been
predominantly cleared as a result of Ag Group lor Earth Mining or Processing Uses. This policy
is intended to assure that the RLSA Overlay is not used to increase the development potential
22lPage
within the ACSC but instead is used to promote a more compact fonn of development as an
alternative to the Baseline Standards already allowed within the ACSC. No policy of the RLSA
Overlay shall take precedence over the Big Cypress ACSC regulations and all regulations therein
shall apply.
Policy 4.22 (recommended new policy)
When historic or cultural resources are identified within the RLSA throull:h the 8M desill:nation
orocess the applicant in coniunction with the Florida Division of State and Historic Resources
will assess the historic or cultural sill:nificance and exnlore the educational and nublic awareness
onDortunities rel2:ardinll: silmificant resources.
Policv 4.23 (recommended new Dolicv)
Wi hin 1- r of r v I hi Ii LDC r I ti
Ii htin sin stand rds m eled from the Dark
environment conserve ener and enhance s
lem n for outdoor
rotect the ni httim
Group 5 M Policies that protect water qu
natural water regime and protect listed
that is not voluntarily included in the Ru
of the natural water regime in areas
verJay Map prior to the time that they
m ~ , Residential Uses, General
ional Uses (layers I M4) as listed
es ential services and governmental
uses or for public safety, shall eflJ.y
rve rmitted uses ma xem t
ek to minimize the extent of im acts to an
. Where practicable,
leared or disturbed areas shall be utilized for oil
Impacts to native habitats. Asphaltic and concrete
be prohibited in eas mapped as HSAs. The opportunity to voluntarily
Credit Program, as well as the fight to sell conservation easements
land, shall constitute compensation for the loss of these rights.
nd quantity and maintenance of the natural water regime and to protect
ecies and their habitats in areas mapped as FSAs, HSAs, and WRAs on
e within the ACSC, all ACSC regulatory standards shall apply, including
t non-agricultural clearing.
Policy 5.3
To protect water quality and quantity and maintenance of the natural water regime and to protect
listed animal and plant species and their habitats in areas mapped as FSAs, HSAs, and WRAs on
the Overlay Map that are not within the ACSC, if a property owner proposes to utilize such land
for a non-agricultural purpose under the Baseline Standards referenced in Policy 1.5 and does not
elect to use the Overlay, these GrouD 5 policies. fallf)\,iflg regula.iaRs are aI'plieaele, shall be
incorporated into the LDC, and shall supercede any comparable existing County regulations that
would otherwise apply. These regulations shall only apply to non-agricultural use ofland prior to
its inclusion in the Overlay system.
23lPage
Policy 5.4 (recommended amendment)
Collier County will coordinate with appropriate State and Federal agencies concerning the
provision of wildlife crossings at locations detennined to be appropriate. A man of these
potential crossinu locations will be develoned within 12 months of the effective date of the
Growth Manauement Plan Amendment and shall be incornorated into ~sea in e, al~8tim:
community cultural and historical and transoortation olanninll for the RLSA includinll all SRAs
described in Grouo 4 Policies.
Stewardship program, non-
ences, shall be directed away
(to be defined in LOe
by complying with the
2.
J>rovisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be
to rni 'mize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and
e wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings,
ses and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife conidors.
on for irnnactinQ: lis~d sneci~.Qr~S1.c:.habitat shall be considered in the
ernent lans as a ro riate.
n!EJ.~ired maAagelflest plaRs:
1. SaHtB fler-iela HHlti Speeies REise .el) PlaR, USPWS, 1"99.
2. IIaeitat HaRagem8Rt G\:!ieleliRes fer the Bald Eagle iR the Selitheast
RegisR, USP'NS, I '}&;.
J. Eeelsg) aRs lIallitat pfstestiss t;eea3 sf Gopher TeFteise (CspHeflis
Jl8IypHem\:!s) P8p1:ilatieRS feliAS SA LaRBs glated fer Large Seale
De,elepmeRt iR FleriEla, Teehnieal ReJ:1sFt ne. 1, Fleries Came 8mi
FresH ',Vater Fish CeffiJRtSSieR, 1 <;'8;.
24lPage
1. Eeslsg; aHa De els}3msRt RelateEl HaBitat ReEluiremeRts sf the Vls196a
Sefli19 JS) V.psleEBma eeefUIssesRs), Teehnieal RepeR ~ls. g, Ple1968
Game ana Fresh "'sterfish CemmissisH, 1091.
5. Eeslsg) BRa lIaBitat PfsteetisR ~reeEls sf the Selitheastem Affie1geaR
Kestrel (Paise Sflaf\ eri1:ls Pa\:lhts) en Large seale De, elsflR.eRt Sites iR
FIs1gea, ~Jengaffie Teehnieal Reran ~la, lJ, Pleriee Came lffi6 Fresh
',Vater Fish CammissisR, 199;.
L it:- The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the
USFWS and FFWCC, subject to the provision paragraph 3 of this policy.
iL ti+.- When listed species or SSLC~are utiliz' site or
indicated by evidence, such as denning, ging, or other indications, a
minimum of 40% of native vegetati' .te shall be retained, with the
exception of clearing for agricul es. The County shall also
consider the recommendation ofot bject to the provisions of
paragraph 3 oftms policy.
b.Mana ement lans shall incl
interactions. Low intensi
courses and ve etation
be used to establish buf
dominated bv human activi
current lruidel. and re lati
conflict. Tht: ent olans
information to busin
resence of wi
m t that ena
s for n
ro ram for develo ments
preS8f\ e BREI the "sea ts fHai"ffiiR the SeNe , eg.etatisR. These reCJl:Iir8mBI.ts
shall be eSR3i3teFlt '" ith the UF'VS SSl:Ith Pls19ss t.1l:1lti Sfleeisi'l Reea. sf) PlaR,
MBj 1999, s1:l19jeet ta the J3f6 .isiefls afparBb'Tarfl (3) eftkis flelis),
a.Fer the Bald eagle (Haliaeetl:ls leuseeephall:ls), the H!<J.l:Iiree HaBitat maRagemsRt
fllaRs SHall establish J3roteeti\ e zaAes RrsuflB tHe eagle Rest restrieting eeFtaifl
aeti, ities. THe flieRS shall alse aesress rest'rieting eeFteiFl types sf aeti\ ities
e1l:1AHg the Rest seaseR. TAese retjl:lirefHents shall ae esnsistent itA tHe UFWS
Sal:lth Fleries Hl:Ilti Speeies Reee\'eT Plan, Ma) IS"()~, s1:lbjeet t8 tHe I3re ,isisns
sf flaragr8j3H (3) eftAis J3slie).
25lPage
e.Fer the rea eeelcaded v.8eaJ3eel~er Iflieeiaes barealis), tke re'luirea hasitat
flFateetisR fllaR shall 81:1tliRe meaS\::Ires ta 8\eia ael" erae ifRfJasts ta aSH\e
shlsteFs aael ta minimize iFRflaeta ta feFagiag habitat. HThere aa. erae effeets
eRR Rst be a.siaea, meaSl:lfeS shall Be tallen ts miaimir:e sa site Elistl:lFl:lBase
aRa esmpeRsate Sf mitigate fer iR<flaets that remaiR. These F8Ej,l:IifemeRts skall
be eeasisteRt ,. ith the UFWS $81:1t8 FleRea ~hilti Speeiea Reea, eF) PlRR, Ma)
1999, sHhjeet t8 tHe )9re .isisR efflafBgfflflh~) sfthi,') petie).
f. 1ft areas v. here the Flerilla blaele eear (Ul'Slii5i BmefleaRI:I3 tleReaRl::Is) ma) ee
198 fllaeea iR bear
'He maRagemeRt fllan shall
')
). Gela 66\::1f3e3
lsistent with applicable policies of this Overlay, consider and utilize
tters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
nd recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in
t orde n property 8entainiRg utilized bv listed species or SSLC's. It is
se agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may eiHtftge
ements contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such
emed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. However no
ildlife orotection Dolicies of Policv 5.5will be considered as these shall
urn standards for wildlife nrotection.
Policy 5.6 (recommended amendment)
For those lands that are not voluntarily included in the Rural Lands Stewardship program,
Collier County shall direct non-agricultural land uses away from high functioning wetlands by
limiting direct impacts within wetlands. A direct impact is hereby defined as the dredging or
filling of a wetland or adversely changing the hydroperiod of a wetland. This policy shall be
implemented as follows:
26lPage
I. There are two (2) major wetlands systems within the RLSA, Camp Keais, Strand and the
Okaloacoochee Slough. These two systems have been mapped and are designated as
FSA's. Policy 5.1 prohibits certain uses within the FSA's, thus preserving and protecting
the wetlands functions within those wetland systems.
2. The other significant wetlands within the RLSA are WRA's as described in Policy
3.3.These areas are protected by existing SFWMD wetlands permits for each area.
3. FSAs, HSAs and WRAs, as provided in Policy 5.3, and the ACSC have stringent site
clearing and alteration limitations, nonpermeable surface limitations, and requirements
addressing surface water flows which protect wetland fu tions within the wetlands in
those areas. Other wetlands within the RLSA are isol seasonal wetlands. These
wetlands will be protected based upon the wetland. onality assessment described
below, and the final pennitting requirements of th Florida Water Management
District. ~ llt
a. The County shall apply the vegetation ce and site preservation
requirements specified within this ppropriate amount of
native vegetation on site. Wetla of this vegetation
requirement according to the fol
i. The acreage requireme
preserving wetlands with
functionality assessment scar
pohcy. The ve ative preservat
5.5 shall first' hrough pres
assessment sco Uniform
score of 0.7, 0
Amendment, the
e those
ore ofO.
greater
nd buffers that are utilized by listed species, or
e ovement of listed species, shall be preserved on
and flowwa ions through the project shall be maintained.
development shall demonstrate that ground water table drawdowns or
ill not adversely change the hydoperiod of preserved wetlands on
ntion and control elevations shall be set to protect surrounding
ds an consistent with surrounding land and project control elevations
ater tables. In order to meet these requirements, projects shall be
d in accordance with Sections 4.2.2.4.6.11 and 6.12 ofSFWMD's Basis
iew, January 2001. Upland vegetative communities may be utilized to
the vegetative, open space and site preservation requirements of this
verlay when the wetland functional assessment score is less than 0.65.
b. In oer to assess the values and functions of wetlands at the time of project review,
applicants shall rate functionality of wetlands using the South Florida Water
Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), as described
in Technical Publication Reg-OOl, dated September 1997, and updated August 1999,
or the Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method, identified as F.A.C.
Chapter 62-345. The applicant shall submit to County staff agency-accepted WRAP
scores, or Uniform Wetlands Mitigation Assessment scores. County staff shall
review this functionality assessment as part of the County's EIS provisions and shall
use the results to direct incompatible land uses away from the highest functioning
wetlands according to the requirements found in paragraph 3 above.
27lPage
c. All direct impacts shall be mitigated for pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (f)
of this policy.
d. Single family residences shall follow the requirements contained within Policy 6.2.7
of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
e. The County shall separate preserved wetlands from other land uses with appropriate
buffering requirements. The County shall require a minimum 50-foot vegetated
upland buffer abutting a natural water body, and for other wetlands a minimum 25-
foot vegetated upland buffer abutting the wetland. A structural buffer may be used in
conjunction with a vegetative buffer that would reduce e vegetative buffer width by
50%. A structural buffer shall be required abutting s where direct impacts are
allows~. Wetland buffers shall conform to the t g standards:
i. The buffer shall be measured landward from. edjurisdictionalline.
ii. The buffer zone shall consist of pre vegetation. Where native
vegetation does not exist, native vege at ith the existing soils and
expected hydrologic conditions sh .
iii. The buffer shall be maintain exotic plants, as
defined by the Florida Exotic
iv. The following land uses a and functions
and are allowed within the bu
(1) Passive recreational areas, I:j
(2) Pervious natur ils;
(3) Water managl:
(4) Mitigation ar
(5) Any other co which is
arable in n
v. buffer m
f.
" shall mean that the wetland functional score of
ed mitigatlO s or exceeds the wetland functional score of the
etlands. Priority shall be given to mitigation within FSA's and HSA's.
e or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands
~ted for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance
on sit d within or abutting the impacted wetland.
shall be provided for preserved or created wetland or upland vegetative
ties offered as mitigation by placing a conservation easement over the
erpetuity, providing for initial exotic plant removal (Class I invasive
plants defined by the Florida Exotic Plan Council) and continuing exotic
t maintenance, or by appropriate ownership transfer to a state or federal
gency along with sufficient funding for perpetual management activities.
IV. Exotics removal or maintenance mav be considered acceotable mitil!ation.--fflt:-the
lass sf .. etlftfuls sr listecl sBeeies haeitat if tRese laRas if these lRflcls Itff: Blaeea
l:lHaer 8 eeFfJetl:ial eSflser. atlsfI eaSem8f1t _ ./\ ith eemetl:lal ffiaiflteaafll;:e
resl:liremeflts.
--f.>v y. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration,
the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (f) i, ii, and iii of this
policy and SFWMD standards. If agency permits have not provided mitigation
consistent with this policy, Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that
of the jurisdictional agencies.
28lPage
g. Wetland preservation, buffer areas, and mitigation areas shall be identified or platted
as separate tracts. In the case of a Planned Unit Development (POO), these areas
shall also be depicted on the pun Master Plan. These areas shall be maintained free
from trash and debris and from Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the
Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Land uses allowed in these areas shall be limited
to those listed above (3.e.iv.) and shall not include any other activities that are
detrimental to drainage, flood, control, water conservation, erosion control or fish
and wildlife habitat conservation and preservation.
4. All landowners shall be encoura ed to consider artici atin
incentives fundin2: or other assistance in facilitatiml w
orivate lands includinll but not limited to federal
nTOQTamS Drivate or public lp"ants tax incentives
conservation orOlITams.
in any nrOlITams that nrovide
'and habitat restoration on
. I a 'cultural conservation
fee or less than fee sale to
Policy 5.7 (recommended new Policy)
An develo ment on lands not artici atin
surroundin land uses. Within 1- ear of
im lemented for 0 tdoor Ii htin
www.darksk .or r ram
nillhttime environment conserve enenlV
e com atible with
lations shall be
Dark Sk
rotect the
LSA the a licant in con' unction
. I assess the historic or cultural
rtuni i re ardin si nificant
resources.
29lPage
30lPage
-.....-..
! ""Ii. COl'.\rJ
()i .~ ,0" II
U'
~. . .
',]
!A,!:'
~
\"
nf.lfOK.-I.LEE
\~.-
......
,
',"
',I
,
c~ t
';
I~
'''1.
I'
u,
,"
O~_~f"LlI
_I.
r
I',
':1,
W/.D~~-!rt UI!.__"
I
II
311 p,
; _'",""H."""~..,"""";~A.-..~,,,,,
I, ~."'C<JIo:ol5<11tConcom
r8-:IOO'fot>lRo~"''''
,:e.,,,,,,,,,..--...;pAro.
1._fOo_~"'..
i C>;>o~_p""
p<'<I1'iIl>O<lV.__",,_
RLSA OVL'RI AY
MAP 1
N
I,,"
COLLIER RL'S.'\
tlYF IF,\H REVIE\'\
m:::1~TINC A1T AUL'\tt:NT A...m'l,' UDSIUP (RJ:o;I..'( ","'OlkSErn
CUIltoc-.,"_I.....~~
It--"~C'-~
-"
_r__
~~,::"~
~~--._=-,-~--~ .-:
...__ _ __.:::e
;.:.~~-
t:;---.::::J.
--
:===':::~:==:!:..-==~=-=::':"=:'-"'----'"
",
-~--._~
-'..-'
32lPage
!!iI.Jll
.---
---
. =--
, =s.-
--~
~_.
:.-- -1-___
l..aJ
"-'JeIJ.:"(~~=~.r,~~~~~~~~!;.I<;l~~.t':~I~dIfd(ll'1
1 '..~. JI,;JIIr~_5~---!!L~l) _ ;'!.!l'~9"~_
~..._ ~'I E....~.....lC~_,,.~-..'.... - =-"- I~ i:;""'_1o"II
1..- -"'-S'" . I"n.q~.,
......~-t.....riOIo "--~ ....."'.:-...'....i -s......_.__~ _-.........
-..h:t. _., __ _.... l-~ .... ~ ........._
......- -..,'04 e f- .=.... --.......
. :;.~. : m. _ ~~ ~_'" 1---~ J
'--~..... ,....-..... '___ ~__......,,_'_..-,_"'ro_.....t,.,._' _..~,__.....
~"l_ ._.......Iar:~_. ..........~ ,__ u_ ....."', ..............,_..
~l.....~ i~_ ...I....ol_<~, ....._ _.,.,
____... Inn _,-" _ ._
~, 'S:", ::=:;--
:::.- ....., "~I' --1' ~~;I~:'.I"""~
........ --~"
---
. --.-.--
~....._--"'"",'........_.
," I
. ~_-.-l I
f$.~ ==.:::,-
::.:'
...-
=="' I ==~'.
-~-
- .....---'"
f= L I I~-::
l.~ :-~,; '-.... . -~::. :
i -~-~ ..--,- __ _
I ~~ =- n I~'~
'. --~r~:;.., -t---+-- -= -j:-::---
1___ _..1____ _ _~
V
33lPage
,,_..
!U1.C-.....1I.I B!
l'tw ntWt_~ IIIf
land.."" b.}l!'rt
,......
St_anhhip
C"""liho
..111....U.~
o..pell'~
,-,~.
AU:ac:hmN't C.Stewardahlp RKeivln; ~ Chara.;;tGrl5tlca
Iii nal8"d lIppr'OWdJ
_~C"
..-..~-~
--------
::-;;:. ._;j:-.=-~:+=:i~~~.,=:;::.f~~~;2;; ~:-.:.-:J
=-=='-~~I; '2i:.:"~'~2~2":~::7r' "'~~~-.l.::. ~..~~;-.1'~.-~=~1
...:::-.:~-=-=- ~'-~--!-'=:::::J:::':-:,:,,~ ~.i
..t~i~t::~~~-t :=~~~~~-f-='.~~~~:E~?t"
_-::.:~.:'':'-:.'-,':;:' ":'-;;'~'=-I ..... -;'~.";:::-~--"
. -'.:....::-- I -"- i --:--
-J- ;::;:::-:: -=:--.-__. __1_ 1 -:':--'-1
____4_ --.-- ,;-~ ~--~..t -- 1 -.._ ,........_/t:--l
, .--:t= .-.- ~..._~ '-'--' _._~.
r=., -- -.:':- -:::.. c::.:-=::;..::;:.::. ;'I-=- -----=:l-..;-:: .:....._._,=.:;:::::.~
--- - ---- -- -- --.....-
,..........-- ~..., --- -,-,p I ,....:;r.,.. I
"-0.__ i , _,_
,.=, =---,="" -.. ~
--'--
-"'--~"'-''''- ...'.- ....'-....-
:::. :::--::::::':;';:':.::=~::::':'='::::~=-~:::-:=:v-":;.":,~~.-"""'4
':.::::'::.:"':="--:': --~.~--_.. --->". -...-._-
"ili,;,
'~.
34lPage
M.c"~ C-ltew...d....lp R~N"1iI At.. Ch.nlcttti..t1~
1_"'_ Amond_"'I
""apOlMd1
...:. ~.-::l
'...~, -,-~ - ,~,...:........_- ,
"'yooO:~-=-.....-
" ':""--r::::::::':"1 ~:~~'::::'::4~~_~ =_ ',' --..-;::==-_
"""''''''''-'. - .....__........"'_ ,_..._._"".... _ c-....fI____"_~
- --1,,0...."".. ---...-r_.....----- --~---:--.
J:.______.to .H__....... I ~___,.
_._....fl_........., _\I'i1I,......~.. 0.....,_ . ....!io>o_..
_-.... MI t._~ l'._ "_.1....<",__
;__a_...
. -
-......-..-..-....,
_...........~----. - .._........._..._..... _.-=......_J~._...
...-..::-----
...".,~-,.._., ,."'.~_.._._."l>. "..._.-.,...._l.o,
__ _ ~W1.___. ~__~._,,__..._..._ _
.-.......-...._...._... ~..-..."';~~"_~.-..r_..' ~:~"'-::;.:~.
.-..........- ...............- u..a.t.illW
,<D::L.........._
---
''''"'',"''"-'......
G.....__~..
.. ::11I4.--""""
..-.~... ,..",....'" ...,
..........""'..-.""....-
_"_...c, '~_'~" ~~....
,...-..-....-.....--
-...--.....;0_.._.
........"".....L_.'_...
'_1..._ .._..........~
-.,..,,,.-....
.J'''''--'IL'_~.........
~IQ"~'
'..
.-...,.......,.","'..........
'.----""...........
- -
'.-
;-oc.~................._...",.......
......-..,..'....-- -""".....", ""......-~;.~
~::~-:::=-1 ::~:! - -:::-:::-.
~~.l.....""'--' ~Lao. ~--*"
_.l_. -- ~~:'"-~=-.~ _. _ d
---
.--~.....---...""...- ...~~,.............';."....- .......--.
~l_"" r...-o-,.......,-....-.._~.,.."""_..~_.__ ~4'.........._,... ......,." ~""''''_''''';~_,.." ...:
-..--....-..--..-.....-.,..""""............... ......-.""...,...._ .......4'. ...._... .'_'_"~"", _---.. .
- "- '-"___''7' .,.......__._..... ....~_,...__..-._~.~..,....
...-............-......-
35lPage
U:O:lMMEP4D€D A.MVY\M~N1 TOA1-r AOlllotliNT A..5T1:W.AllD<<UII' C"[J)n'WOR~ltEIIT
-----.........--..~~.....,.......~........
=''':.'':..i.. ~J - C~4-J - J
~~:--=~
-
-.-~. _.~ --
-,.....---.--....----
-....------..--....-
-,.....--'----.-
--
=~==-_:.:=.:=---
--
-.---
- -....-
~~~~~~J?_
,.1
::iii I
._~
--:.....==-.:J
:~,-"""--
I___~~ _'_"'__'-l.IIIIII.lIIl_
.......~~_If__.iblo.....-'_ -c...
---..-...--.-.... ___ ~.;.:l
---!J
_"'r....!
.... ",,"--...io-.i.....M<-._ ____..
----.....------
-...--------.-..---
v
36lPage
Rural Lands Stewardship Areas
~ 82 P
"
Hendry County
, ,
-, ".
..\:\~
, '"
SR8;...... .,
~ '.." ~~
~ ,',-
, I
,
."
~
z
LAKE TRAFFORD RD l-
I
~
~...
if>
in
~
if>
..
.
-II>
Go enGate
Est les
.J
~-r
"f~.
,- r ,
o
~
~
if>
'"
:i'
~
"
~
'"
'"
GOLDEN TE BLVD W
caffier County
~
W+E
S
I
o
I
1,5 3
I
6 Miles
j
CR846
Legend
DACSC
. Public Lands
Stewardship Areas
TYPE
Flowway Buffer
. Flowway
Habitat
III Water Retention
175
/'/D75 :
~/C2cen->~
P0-3e 70,
.
2"
E
if>
.
U
~
o
"'
.
"
2i
~
U
-
o
,~
~ E
, ,
" c
> .
. 5
, E E
~g*
.2(1)"0
~ -g.2
. . .
=-0"5
E 2 E
~~.E
"O"E .'!::
lij'ij5~
o ~ ()
~=~
Qi'u.. 3:: <I)
a~~~
3-0 ~ 3::
::::EllliV
t;l..c::...J(j5
ff1ll~~
~Q):=l.....
~.E-g 5
a.Q)lll~
.a:::J...Jo:::
~~~rn
,\l1i'~~
iZ~~
- Q).- Q)
-l5E.c::
~....Q5-;
Uv-
lltQ>Cl:=J
&!~~.l!
-e;;;
.as!.!
<<s(/)U)CI)
~
al
-
,
-
c
o
;
u
2
iii"'1ii
E ::; <Ii
"'C rn.~
l:: Z.2
I'll (1)0
"' "' 0,
.!!! -:<(
:::J.;B(/)
E:o ,,""'
<3 ~
I.L.U2
llf.g..g
.2 -55~
." 0,
> " 0,
_ ~ I'll
~2~
~~;E
u.. roo?::
Q)'3OJ
=~~
l!! ("llll
(tI z'-c
~ .... w
,g ~ ~
e .
.9 Q..o
al~~
-g <Ii E
Al.~ Qi
.S ~-g
.~ t.) E
li~~
~IIl<l)
~'E"E
o ctl <tI
;;:n
~ U5ii5
~ l!!-g
'" .
~~S-
~~~
"
~
u
15
"
.
,0
E
,
c
.
c
a .~
::= d)
.-
g~
cE
o .
""
3l E
E:.e
Q):':
-"
, ~
~.2U
:a ~ .~
3rnro
0- > c:
"5.em
i.a ~
;t:aa:
~.l:: Q)
fSg>s
;c..c"3
H~
~.<(
"a'S:~
~E;
... . "'
e8~
~N~
~H
OIcnU)
..
1
~
"
..
~
-
'6
e
u
a.
:E
"
"
~
..
~
'"
c(
'"
..J
'"
~
c
~
o
u
~
~
'0
u
c(
C
"
E
~
u
~
S
c
o
"iii
"S:
..
'"
"
"
"
c
"
E
E
o
u
"
'"
~
"
>
ffi
~
~
.
~
~
.
'5
E
,
u
x
.
,
"
>
"'
z
.~
0;
~
u
x
"'
"
'I
.
.
2i
"
.
o
15
!l N N N ."
~ d d d 0 d 0 0 ~
> c
E
i
!i
"
>
=
~
~
j
"0
.
~
~
;;
,
e
,
u
~
E
,
c
.
c
E
.
0;
"
.9
.
"
;,-E
,_ 0
>-
'ii'5t5~
-;.al
i l'l ~ ~
I"l'- 0 u
~al:;::c
Q:"C ~.Q
tac:.9iii
o "' "
~~&~
;: S (I) ".
b (/) C
... (I) 0 w
~O::t)€
UU-S:Q)
~"*~:S
o en . .
0:: . ft!~
_Mr')f")
'0.0,0,
~ cu cu Gl
l/J---
cuU)U)U)
ll:
.
,
"
>
~
~
<{
c
o
~
&!
x
c
,0
0;
u
~
"
c
o
0;
~
.
oc
x
"'
"
'I
.
,
'i!
o
.0
0;
<
ffi
.
d::
"
.2
'5
u
~
x
"'
"
'I
"
"
c
o
'"
u
S
"
.5
"
o
'"
..
'3
u
ii
(,)
-
'6
e
(,)
a.
:c
"
"l!
..
~
s
Ul
"
'"
'3
e
o
IL
-
'6
"
~
u
a.
:c
"
"l!
..
~
s
Ul
"
'6
.
i3
~
~
"
.
.
'"
'"
"'
.
2
,
g
.
oc
l'
.2
.
z
*
~
"
'6
.
i3
o
g
~
~
"
~
~
~
:J:
&; ~
:G ~ ~
(II c: e
::J .0 Il.. '"
i ~ ~ -g ~
~ ~ 8 ~ ::J
:: ~ o,!l .~
;) ffi ~ ~
1 ~ ~ €
:i ~ ~ ~
. . .
3: 3l:ll
~ ~ ~
- t N
g-I &. g-
e ~ e
"~,,
"
'6
.
i3
o
,0
0;
~
.
oc
~ a> ." l!?
8 E .a .2
~ B B a
& ~I~ ~
.
~
.
in
.
N ~ ,;
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
" "
.
.
. ~ N Q 1 !Jill: ~ ! Q ! 0000
.. .. .. .. "NN " N" N..;.;<<i
> > > >
;;:
z
"0
~
~
;;
,
~
u
~
.
in
I i I
I
. ~ ~ ~ . Q . ~ N Q
, .. .. .. Q .. .. .. .. ..
"
>
00 on.... c
c:i c:i 0 c:i
... M t'\l 0
c:i ci ci ci
.... on... M 0
o ci d 0 0
"'
.
~
~
~
~
"
H
; ~
SB
~ ~ .
~ 5i :5
</I ~ ~ ~
8 ~ ~ <Il
~ . " ~
.E c.~ ~
I ,m.~ al
. ilil12
~ ~ -
:r -g -g] ?;
:= -- c. c: ..8
- H ~ .
!. 0 0 G ~
i lii lii .g '0
... ~ ~ Iii ~
.!! (ll III :5 0
.... a. a. 0 z
.
.
~
c
2
::: iii
Ql.9 '"
~ ~ ~
8~!~g
]~2~~
iiI 0 ~ :5 ~
~ ~ {l ~ :G
~~~.s'~~
II,. <I! II) ~ III .g
.~€~~"2~
'lI ~ 13 OJ ~ '0
l5 III ~ .!i ... OJ
il ~ 8<= -g 1? c:
a:: j :s: 5 ~
~
"
~
.
~
*
~ ~.
~ U) is.
I 0
o .!:!
~ :s
~ ,
u.. ~ Q)
~ ~.8
$ ~ .
g 8 ~
~~~
" ~ c
~ ~ ~
.
~
c
o
.
. ~
~ a
'6 III
,Eo III
.. ti ~ .~
~:! 51 m
~ -g :5 c '"
~ <\I III ~ ~
~}J "i c: !:!
~~6E.~
l g -g -l!l "%
;g8"8l~~
u
i · ~ 15
i~~ <l;
IS; u. (IJ c:
~I'ii -;~ ~ ~
)1 ~ I! m ~
" '1: <II :2 .t: Iii <I)>
P f "E .jg c: (IJ 0
~I ~ ~ ~ ,g B -0
:"'IL.~jj~:
It: >.(1) Gl u:6
~ i~~~]
~S~~~4:~
"
if>
"
u~
~ .
~U"
~ .
- N M . .~
~ ~15 ~ ~" ~ c
, , o ' 0 c
e " 0 " ,_ 0 ~~ E
" ~ ~ " . . .
. . . . f -g -g ~~ ~g-,5
~ ~ ~ ~ .. . . ~ c ~g.~~
0 j~@ c
" " " " ,g .~ :8 ~ 8 ~ ~
~ ~ i:l ~ :::.E E e - .
" " " H ~,g ~:6
u " " .1!J a B s
, ~ ~ ~ I~-- ~ o:c c:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . . lIIXlIIlII
~ ~ ~ ~ 1l.:!.<(LS, ~~ UWZD..
.
.
o
~
~
~
o
U
~
.
~
o
<i
~
I
t! <i
'S~
~~
"'~
:il ~
~I~
~ w
=
~
~
j
70
RLSA LESS THAN 20 ACRES PARCELS
Iii
n
~
z
~
Jo-_ ~,
!'>
I
1"l:
'," ~
..
,~
I
.
I':'
'l<t~],.
( [f1"i
~ -kJ.
.(~1
l
L
J
o
2
4
Miles
.
;s:.....
.
W+E
S
Legend
CRLSA Boundary
_RLSAParcel
less than 20 aCfe!l
_ ConSllMltlon
D Lee County
_ Hendry County
c=J Collier County
FI",Z:m.llY...GI~~.....
RLSA Ownership by Acreage Range
Ownership Size Number Acreage
Ranoe In acres of Owners Reoresented
1000+ 15 168,313
500-999.9 8 4,804
100-499,9 17 3,137
40-99.9 21 1,280
10-39.9 29 498
1-9.9 143 620
less than 1 25 13
Totals 258 178,665
Data Source: Collier County Property Appraiser
71212OOl1.2042lJ.V""I.AJ...Jriu
'^'"
OJJI2-l1{lO..OOJ-!'WU:.321&4
~ <;:ounty
-
MAJOR PROPERTY OWNERS
IN THE RLSA
HENDRY COUNTY
.
>
0-
Z
:::J
o
o
w
w
""'
z .>,
FJ ~ .
.
" ~<lI!~~
,. r" "
,",
"'--'<'
CORKSCREW RD
t....
.--
,
D
3
'm
o
LEGEND
CRlSA
"SOO-FoctResto,alionArea
'.
Arlll of Critical Slale COI'lCSrrl
"FIOWWaYSlewa,dshipArea.
"
Habt~at Stewardship Arllll
~permiltlKlWatllfRetel\1I0nArea
i, i
,
cpe LAND
i'J INVT.
E LVO
PUBLIC LANDS
Q
.
"
W
D
~
o
ffi
~
~
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
~ - -
Preserving Southwest r7orida's natural
environment and quality ofhfe .. now
andforever
TO:
Collier County Planning Commission
FROM:
Conservancy of Southwest Florida
DATE:
February 26, 2009
RE:
Conservancy Recommendations for the Rural Lands Stewardship
Area (RLSA) 5-Year Review Phase Two Report
The Conservancy appreciates the opportunity to submit the following
recommendations for consideration during your RLSA Phase Two Report
deliberations. Our organization has been actively involved in the RLSA 5-year
review, submitting comments and participating in all relevant public hearings,
We appreciate the time that you have spent in discussing the Phase Two Report
and your generous allowance for extensive public comment during the process,
In November 2007, the Conservancy submitted a list of 20 issues that we
believed should be part of the RLSA review, Based on the evolution of that
review process during the past 16 months, we have focused our comments and
submit the following recommendations for your consideration.
Primary Recommendations
Policy 4.2
Provide for a specific cap on the creation of stewardship credits at a maximum of
315,000 credits, which has been acknowledged by the RLSA committee as the
approximate number of credits currently available.
Allow for a redistribution of the current 315,000 credits in order to provide
flexibility in incentivizing meaningful restoration, and the protection of agricultural
lands, habitat areas and corridors,
Policy 2.2
Allow for increased credits, not to exceed the maximum 315,000 credits currently
built into the program, for protection of agricultural lands both within and outside
of the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) that are also designated as primary
zone panther habitat Primary zone panther habitat should be defined based on
promote sustainable and self-sufficient project design, Increasing the minimum
density of SRAs should be part of such a review.
Policy 4.7.2
Keep the maximum size of villages at 999 acres and do not allow villages of any
size within the AGSG,
Policy 4.10
All Open Space, even Open Space acreage that exceeds the required 35%,
should be included in the total SRA acreage,
Policy 4.20
All public benefit uses, including essential services, should be included in the
SRA acreage.
Policy 4,21
Remove SRAs from the AGSG.
Policy 4.23
A new policy should be included requiring a Dark Skies program - with
provisions applicable to both RLSA participants and non-participants - to be
implemented through LDG regulations within one year of the approval of any
RLSA GMP amendments.
Policy 5.7
A new policy should be included to require a Dark Skies program - with
provisions applicable to both RLSA participants and non-participants - to be
implemented through LDG regulations within one year of the approval of any
RLSA GMP amendments.
Panther Zones in RLSA Boundary
N "
\~
. Lj ,cl
, r-
>.<j
)
,-,"-'-",-'l
I
I
I
,._J
D RLSA Boundary
D Immokalee Footprint
_ Lake Trafford
Panther Habitat Zones
Primary
C.,] Secondary
-...s~ PJ ~
\OPJ -~ '"1
\0 ~ ~ ~.(JQ
0\ PJ ~ ::; (D
'-' (JQ (D ::1": ~
(D '"1 (D 0
S S \/l S
(D C (/;. (D
a~PJ '"1
O(JQ ~ PJ
0-+; '"1 ~
(D PJ ~~
~ ~ L::.. \/l
t"'"!- ~ (D
~. - n
'"1 (D t"'"!-
(D ~.
- ~ -<
PJ ~. (D
~ t"'"!- ~
o..~t"'"!-
\/l t"'"!- ~
n ~ (D
PJ (D ~
~ 0.. t"'"!-
(D (D ~
~ \/l (D
~ cJO. n
~~O
Z PJ ~
o ~ (D
~ 0.. ~
PJ
t"'"!-
~.
o
~
(D
t"'"!-
PJ
I---""
.
tj \/l n -< ~
~ ~ 0 ~. -3
=. ~ ~ PJ ~
a 55' ~ [ (D
PJ - ~ ~. 0
S' \/l PJ "< -<
~. n t"'"!- \/l (D
~ :?- o. 8' ~
-<~~o..~
~. PJ ~ (D' ~
PJ :::s I---"" \/l tj
g: 0.. ~ 0 8.
(D tj ~ HJ~
PJ ~ ~ S' p;-- (JQ
5.$ \/l (JQ ~ S
PJ C ~ a Vro ~
'"1-0 C n \/l
(D a :::s \/l PJ PJ
-< o. \/l t"'"!- '"1 (JQ
S ~ ~ u 8. (D
~ \/l (D (D -< ~
(D 0 '"1 coo
@HJn~@s
U \/l 0 0.. \/l
I---"" ~ ~ (D ~. ~
(D (D :::s :4 \/l 0
t"'"!-n (D PJ t"'"!-~
o ~. n ~ ~ C
(D t"'"!-(D PJ-
~ \/l ~. ~ t"'"!- PJ
C t"'"!- ~. t"'"!-
tj ~ t"'"!- PJ ~.
P PJ"< t"'"!- 0
PJ t"'"!-' --"" ~
~ . ~
::r-. ....-
PJ \/l
-< - t"'"!-
(D 0-+;
o
o
~
(j')
(tI
~
(j')
~
(j')
I
U
PJ
(j')
(tI
0...
'""i
(tI
(j')
(tI
'""i
-<
(tI
0...
(tI
(j')
..... .
(JQ
~
~
'""i
o
o
(tI
(j')
(j')
~ ~ ~
~ '""i 0...
o (tI
-< ~
..... . l"""'t-
0... ......
(tI~
PJ PJ
o...'""i
o...(tI
...... PJ
o. (j')
o l"""'t-
~ ::r'
PJ PJ
I--' l"""'t-
I--'
I--'
o
--+:.
l"""'t-
::r'
..... .
(j')
~
o
'""i
~
0...
o
~
(tI
..... .
~
PJ
u
(tI
(j')
l"""'t-
(j')
o
..... .
(tI
~
o
(tI
"
::r'O
PJ 0
uS:::
I--'
0...
u
(tI
'""i
(tI
(j')
l"""'t-
o
'""i
(tI
0...
l"""'t-
o
..... .
l"""'t-
PJ
l"""'t-
~
'""i
~
PJ
~
l"""'t-
::r'
(tI
'""i
(j')
.
?go:
l"""'t- ;:4. (tI
~ ::r' a
(tI ......
2:~~
n~
PJ ~
1--'0...
o (j')
o 0
(j') PJ
PJ~
~(tI
l"""'t- I--'
o ......
::r'~
(tI ~
(tI PJ
~~
......~
-< (j')
(tI"-'
'""i l"""'t-
l"""'t- 0
o ::r'
(tI PJ
~ u
(j') ......
~ S
'""i l"""'t-
(tI (j')
(j')
~
(tI
'""i
(j')
PJ
I--'
.
(j') ~
~ 0...
'""i (tI
-< ~
...... l"""'t-
-< ......
~~
o PJ
--+:.'""i
l"""'t- (tI
::r'PJ
(tI (j')
~~
I--' (j')
o (tI
::l. ~
0... O.
PJ PJ
I--'
~ l"""'t-
15 0
l"""'t- l"""'t-
::r'::r'
(tI (tI
'""i I--'
...... 0
~ ~
l"""'t-(JQ
::r'1
(tI CD
~ '""i
...... S
I--'
0...
.
u n 0 ~ n
(D 0 (D 0 0
<:; ::s - ~
-. 0...
(D 0... ::s (D 0...
- C (D C
0 -
"'d n p:l "'d n
,...;. ,...;. ,...;.
n "'d (D 0 n
,...;.
0 0 ::r- (D 0
~ "'d p:l ~ a
rJJ c U ,...;.
(D -. ..... . "'d
- p:l
"'i p:l ,...;. 0
p:l -
<:; ,...;. rJJ
..... . ,...;. ~
p:l ..... .
0 n ,...;.
,...;. p:l ..... .
..... . ~ 0 cr 0
0 <:; ::s ..... . ~
~ ,...;.
..... . C,/') p:l p:l
"'i p:l (D ,...;. -
(D cr "'i "'d p:l
n ..... . <:;
0 - p:l p:l ~
..... . ,...;. ,...;. p:l
a ,...;. n
"< _. -
0 ~ "<
a
p:l ::s (D C,/')
(D ~ N rJJ (D
::s p:l 0 rJJ
0... -
"< ::s
p:l rJJ (D
,...;. ..... . C,/')
-. rJJ
0
::s
C,/')
... ;:uo
~ -"ll)
Z "TI <-
0 0 CD 0
ll) -'0
~ :J -.
CD I CD VI
-. c: VI ll)
-. ~ :J"
0- ""0 ll)
ll) ll) ~
:J ~ 0
0 0 :J"
:J" CD
~ CD CD
CD VI
-. V
~ I'J
'<
""0 :J"
CD ll)
VI
^
I'J
0
0
3
.
r- 0
r- I I
n ~
::::s ........ "0 (D
PJ :::;) --+; ~ ~
0 PJ 0 0 (D > ::n
~ ::::s (D :::;)
>< C "0 C >-: ........ ::::s
" 0..- :::;) ::::s (D S ........
>-: (/J C _.
PJ PJ 0..- n ........ ~
........ n ........ PJ _.
'-D ........ PJ cr PJ PJ C < 0
" ::::s
'-D "0 _. ~ ~ >-: _. ::::s
PJ ~ _. _. PJ 0..-
V1 (D PJ 0 0 >-: . .
::::s (D cr (/J
~ ::::s
'" . 0..- n ::::s ::::s _.
0 (/J ........ ~
n 0 0 ~ _.
PJ S --+; ::::s ~ _.
0 aq --+;"0 '-< ~
a ~ (D o 0 :::;)
~. "0 :::;) (D PJ _.
_. n >-: (D 0..- ::::s'U ::::s ::::s
(/J _. (D C
~ C (/J 'Tj (D ........ 0..- ~
........ (D 0..- PJ :::;)
(D ~ ........ 0 (/J
C 0..- 0 ~ _.
'-< ~ --+; _. C (/J
>-: 0 >-: ~ 0 >-:
PJ _. N
(D --+; 0..- >-: ::::r ::::s <
~ ........ 0
PJ ~ (D _.
PJ ........ PJ :::;) _. < ::::s
PJ ::::s
........ S "0 (D (/J PJ (D
. ::::s (D
" PJ ~ ........
0..- ........ :::;) PJ
tv _. ::::s >-: ~ 0
>< (D _. >-:
C ~ n (/J --+; (D
0 :::;) (/J
0 (/J 0 (D 0 C N ~ (D
:::;)
tv (D --+; >-: < (/J 0 (/J
~ (/J ::::s (D ~ ::::s (D (/J
_. PJ
. ~ PJ (/J >-: 'Tj (D
" _. (D
" 3: ~ '-< ~ ::::s
PJ ........
C ::::s 0 _. >-: 0 ~
PJ ~ (D _.
>-: >-: PJ
(D PJ --+;aq "0 _.
(D 0..- ........
:::;) ........ >-:
" >< ~
:::;) (D PJ ~
>-: ~ 0
(/J (D (D (/J
PJ (D (D "0
~ ~
~ a (/J ::::s PJ :::;)
0..- (/J "0 ~ ::::s (D
_. _. (D (/J
I < ~
n :::;) ........
(D ~ 0
_. :::;) (D
(D (D >-: ::::s
(/J . (Jq
I
r::J
r
"4
o
!;l
.
C1j
~.'.'~.
-~
.-
.J
... ;co
<.~
~ z " ~ 8
Q) 0 0 Ul
::> ~
m , CD Q)
~ c !!l. :;;r
iT -0 ~
n
Q) Q) :;;r
::> 0" CD
n :;;r CD
~ CD
Ul
CD V
~
.:z IV
-0 :;;r
CD Q)
Ul
^
IV
0
0
3
{
~
Cj;;I
*
)> ........
0.. . U
C .""
00 '-'
.-+ V G\
(f) ~
10 ~ 0 ^ ~
ill I
:J ...j:::.. ~ I Vl ----
0.. -- -- ---J .-- ~
\~' - 0 ~ r-t
(f) -- 1-'"
C .~ ""
'-'
cr ~
I
ill C/)
0..
C I-" .
.-+ N
(f) rc
- *
cr
C
.-+
:J
0
.-+
^
.-+
.-+
CD 'T'
:J 7 tJj r- "....-1
(f) ........, ,......,
1-'" ~ ......' -.,
'JG "" :r,-' ......'
'-' H ~
::T' c... rc rc a-
rc ---- ----
'"0 ....... ....... .......
H < < ----
rc ~ I-" .
..... r-t r-t
H r-t i "" ......
rc 1-'" '-' <
'J; ~
....... ~ 'JQ
'J: . .-< a-
, ""
r-t ----
rc ..... rc '-'
i
~ ......' rc
~ ~
n a-
rc r-t
---- 1-'"
'"0 rc ~
H n
"" r-t
'-'
a-
~
a-
......'
----
1-'"
r-t
'.....
,
e;-g8~~g~
g. '"d ~ 0.. ~ ~ '"d
'" C _ CJ'J.... ~ s::
~" ......... . n CJ'J f'r ........
~ ~ .-+ ~" v~ ~
~ o'~ '"d ~. :j o'
g:~(D(D~ -_
.-+ CJ'J n '"d ~ -'
~.-+" O.......-l~........
.-+ ~ '"d ~ (D .-+ ~
0" ~ o"""i CJ'J ~ (D
~ _. C;;''""'! ........
CJ'J CJ'J < .-+ CJ'J '-<
(D -'-.<'""'1' .-+
_O"o..~~ 0
ri~(D(JQ~
_ '""'! CJ'J .-+ ~
:j (D.........O.-+ ~
~~s::>--tJ~ -<
_. CJ'J ~ (D (D
~<.-+
CJ'J -. (D a '"0 (JQ
CJ'J~- '""'! (D
0" ~ ~ _. ~
8........oqa (D
O"(DS::-.~ <'""'1'
........ 0..(JQ ><: '""'! _.
~ (D ~o'-< n
;;a~ >--tJN ~
0\,J~0 0
(JQ~~~ 0"
'""'!(Dc(D (D
~ '""'!~ -
'"d'-+~~ ~
~o................ CJ'J
o'CJ'J ~ ~ ~
~s::~'""'! '""'!
........ '"d 0.. (JQ (D
~-g 0.. (D .g
~ '""'! _. ~.
CJ'J .-+ ;4 - .
........~ c ~
o """i (JQ
~ 0"
(JQ 2..
5.~ I I; ~
g.-g Z '"0 Z ~ 0
0="00 -~
s 2. s:: -g ~ ~ ~
CJ'J 0 ~ ........ ~ 0 n
-. - >--tJ ~ 0" 0" 0
(JQ ~ 0 ::t. _. ~ C
~-'""'! 0;::::; 0"........
_. _. ~ ~ :=;. _. 0..
>-+j 7' ,," ........
- (D (D (D ........ _. CJ'J
n_(DvO~C
~ '-< ~ '" CJ'J
~.-+ '"d CJ'J 0 '"d
.-+ 0 n ~ _. >-+ '"d
~ ~ ~ ~ J 0
~ '""'! .-+ CJ'J '"d """i
0" ~ ~ _. '"0 (D .-+
_,~ CJ'J 0 """i '""'! --.)
.-+ ~ q ~ ;.~. <0
~ _. 0 _. ;::::J CJ'J I
_~ '"d ~ ~ (D -0
o ~'-+"""i_../::;:.
CJ'J ;4 (D 0 '-< h '"d
CJ'J ~ CJ'J C/l N (D ~
0" (D ~ ~
;:;:::- n8~.-+
'" 0 ~ CJ'J ~
o ~ (D CJ'J (D
'""'! 0.. C '""'!
0.. ~ a CJ'J
(D '""'! _.
n '-< ~
:::-: N (JQ
~ 0
(D ~
CJ'J (D
-
_.
(JQ
~
.-+
-
'-<
C/J ~::::r':::ju "
(tlCCo)-'O-'
............ Co) 0
.....:. -' rr -,""0
O n ~.- r- ~
I""""'i'--I""""'i'--,....J_.....;
C -, Co) ...... -
C/10........Co)Co)......
-'...... :::r"
I""""'I"-::::S ~ - -.
:::r"Co) <: =,0 (tl
,...... - _. - -
; _.I""""+,....;.....,j ~
(tl ...... :::r"CfG <' Co)
Co)<< -, '_
...... -...... -'.....
C/Jf""""t-~:::::r-~I""""+
......:::r"......(tlrr:::r"
o -.:::r" _. (tl
0(tl3~-'
......c ......
:::r"(JQ """0 EJ<< ;;0
(1) :::J~.-J CD
n ::;Co):::r"n
o::Jl-'<Co)O
::> c.5 ~ Co) rr <
C/) CfQ ~ :::.: ~. ~
(tl ::; N Co) Co) ,...l
--:....J. crl""""+'
< ~ 0 -n """0
Co),..;-(tlO-
............-' Co)
-'Co) (tl Co) ::; _
o ....... ...... C/1 -'
::> 0-' ---l rD (tl
~~--: .-
Co) ::;:::r"J < ~
[Co)(tl..o~O
::> n C 0-.-
--: 0.. 0 C) ~
(D_::::s=:::::S~
n ,~
o ::t,,':1" (tl <
o C/1 _ "'" >-+,."
<r';~J ~~
(tl C Co) 0',..;
-.O(tl::>_........
<< ""+) 0.... 0.... ......;. ""+)
C/1 C/1 C
o -d '0 C/1 C/1 -.
""+) Co) C/1 ""0 :::r" g:..
~......C/1Co)O(tl
.....,J _. f""""'t-
(D PJ 0 _.C --:
-~~--
""0 (tl ~ - 0.... 0
Co) ... -' (tl >-+ C/1
::> ;::;., Co) X 0'C/1
......(tlrr......n
:::r"-_.(tl,....0
,....;l""""t-__~
(tl........Co)-'C/1
'"""":~ l""'""I'-f""""'t-
',-, 0
~ 0 0_
rJ'. ~ --J
(D
...,., ~ ;
0_.....;......,
......-
--: :::J ~
-',.......\...,
0...:=_
Co)........:j
""0 :::r" ~, --:
Co)(D- (';)
.....
::> ...,..,......
...... ....(D
:::r":J.::>
(D ::s Co) _
'"""":.....J::: r3
""0 ~ n ;a
O<<(tl 0
""0 NO 2
C ""+)
t::l2(tl
......,..;x
_.,."
o ,~ -,
_ _.Cf:;.
-.J:r" =.
. -
.~ (D ,....)
C/1(JQ
,:/) _
(tl -'
::> 0
......::>
-'-'
~(tl
......
...... .
o Co)
-
.....
3 (IG
Co) (tl
_.'JJ
::> Co)
...... ......
Co) -'
:::. 0...
-'-
-'-'
::> Co)
(JQrr
-,
Co)......
Co)
< ~
p;' o--r;
rrE:
--'
(D n
......
-,
o
::>
C/J
(';)
n
c
~
-
,..;
0..
~
-
,..;
0..(1,
-
if> ,..;
-,
::;
C/J
(';)
n
o
-
,..;
0..
~
--:
'<
N~
--:
o _.
::;
,..;
PJ
-
<<
-
,..;
(D
~
:::r"
-(tl
_::>
".
...,
cr
..... 3
p;
.....""0
Co)
n
......
C/1
-
n:
if>
.....
o
-
pj
.....
-,
C
::>
Co)
<
o
_.
0....
Co)
rr
.......
(D
<<
o
C
::>
(D
(tl
0....
rr
o
......
:::r"
o
-
,..;
.'"'
"'"
--:
::;-
CJ
-
,..;
n
r_
-
,..;
,..;
(1,
-
,..;
.....
-
,..;
t',,;
'"'
"'"
-
,..;
r~
-,
c
c...
_.
-
,..;
CTC;
.....
--:
~
::;
if>
-0
o
--:
.-+
~
.-+
_.
o
-
,..;
;J>
.-:
o
-,
c...
;J>;J>;J>
.-: .-: .-:
000
_.
c...
-
~ ~
:::i ~
0... CL
if>
C n
if> ~
(D-o
~. (')
~ ~ -:
I"T'. ""1 -
,~ ~
::; elO
if> _
_. :j
::h
(D
n :::s p..;
s:::.:: r-1" ""1
=. Co) (C
o :t. c;
:::s ~
;::l
-
,..;
n
-
::;
::::D
c3
C/J
.-+
--:
C
n
.-+
C
-
o
0..
-
(1)
0..
C
n
.....
........ ........
o
;::l
.....
o
.....
~
-
c.........
o
n
o
::>
C/1
--:
(D
0..
C
n
.-+
o
-
,..;
o
--:
0..
(D
no
-
c5
0..
".
...,
.-+
_.
r-
"'"
::;
o
-+-;
::;-
~
cr
.-+
".
-
.-+
cr
".
-
if>
(D
...,.,
Co)
n
......
o
z
o
-.
C/1
::>
(D
......
-
o
C/1
C/1
o
""+)
-
-,
Co)
......
-'
0....
C/1
n
Co)
""0
(D
0....
(tl
-.
""+)
C
::>
n
......
_.
o
-
-'
o
-.
n
Co)
-.
-.
<<
_.
......
-'
(JQ
n
Co)
""0
CJ
n
-,
......
<<
en "
(f) c
Q)
..... 0 r-+
Q)
(J) c
0 c
.....
~ Q) r-+ ....,
:;;:::: 0 ::T CD
~ CD
(J) ~
('[) 0 r
.....
Q, 0
CD Q)
& G)
Q) en ::::J
~ ~'G) a. ~
CD r-+ c..
::::l ('[) (J)
-' .g -
~c: () I " ...., C
~~ Cl cu- CD
0< :::J ::::l :J 0 r-+
'" (J) a.
~~ S- () -:.< ::T en
~~ ~ ~ ....,
o ~ ~ () -- CD CD
;)>~ C)' ('[) :::r c..
:::J "'" Q)
~ ::l. Q) en
0
.....
Q.. .....
CD ("')
~ - ;0
r CD
~ CD
:::J CD CD ::::J
s. Q)
~ :J to Q)
a.
() -- ....,
0 0 --
-. 0
CD ::::J
.....
en
-l en r I G) 0 () () ()
0 ~ m m r m I 0 0
~ ~ m z ~ en ~ r C
0 0 0 ;:0 r Z
r en ;:0 m -l r m -l
0 -< en 0 0 ;:0 -<
~ -l
-l
m
;:0
VJ ..... (]I --.J (J) """ I\J Ql
::l
;>I""
;::0
Dl
() 0 .....
CD C VJ (]I VJ ..... VJ ..... VJ
C1 (J) """ (]I ..... I\J
Dl --.J <0 <Xl 0 I\J """ --.J 0
::J CD <Xl """ VJ --.J (J) 0 --.J 0
a. (J) """ --.J I\J 0 VJ <Xl (]I
(J) <0 (J) *
I --.J I\J 0 <Xl
en
"'C
Dl
::J
()
0
:::::!,
(Q
::J
0'
...,
0 C
:::::!. Dl
Cl.. ::::!"
Dl 0
Dl ::J
::J
Cl..
I CD
NX
o-
W
o
.
.
-0 _~ ~ ~ --+. ()
::::::!. 0 ::J () Q.. a
30:=;0(1) :J
ill _0 (I) 3:J CJ)
~oill3~ CD
oen l
NOOO(l) <
o Q.. en Q)
:Jill"'Oillill t""'+'
~8:aroCi3 a
-.< -:
r-+ -. r-+ ..J
-. Q.. ::J :J.
~ :J. (I) () )>
ill co -..... l
_ ill (I) CD
ill"'Oc3 ill Q)
() (I) (I) en CJ)
.......... (I)
(I) 3"'0 Q..
enill.....-
-. :J .Q. g.
:J (I) (I) (I)
():J().....
Cr-+r-+(I)
(I)
D.; ~ Q.. en'
:J 0"'0 en
co roO C
ill ()"'O ~
- r-+'- -.
- -...... ()
o 0 ill -.
--+.:Jr-+(I)
r-+ --+. o. :J
::J r-+
(l)o:J-
..... _. ill
-o3:J:J
illOQQ..
:J.....(I)r-+
r-+(I)illO
::Jr-+en
(I) ::J /T\
..... ill \1.1
:J
;00
CD CD
-:J
~CJ)
-- --
at""'+'
:J'<
CJ) I
:::r
-. )>
"'0 -
t""'+'
CD
l
:J
Q)
t""'+'
-.
<
CD
--1
l
Q)
:J
CJ)
"'0
a
;4
Q)
t""'+'
-.
a
:J
.
o
CD
:J
CJ)
t""'+'
'<
I
r
Q)
:J
0..
()
a
:J
CJ)
c
3
"'0
t""'+'
a
:J
;0
CD
Q)
t""'+'
a
:J
CJ)
:::r
-.
"'0
o
a'
00
~
~
<
~
f""'to.
'"""" .
o
=:s
00
To:
Collier County Planning Commission
From:
Thomas Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner
Date:
February 26, 2009
Subject:
Staff follow-up to questions and information requested by the CCPC at the end of the
CCPC February 20, 2009 meeting
[1] Page 62......Policv 4,20. A question was raised concerning the meaning of Policy 4.2 below, in
particular the words, "excluding essential services".
Policy 4,20 (recommended amendment)
The acreage of a public benefit use shall Het count toward the maximum acreage limits described in
Policy 4.7 but shall not count toward the consumption of Stewardship Credits, For the purpose of this
policy, public benefit uses include: public schools (preK-12) and public or private post secondary
institutions, including ancillary uses; community parks exceeding the minimum acreage requirements of
Attaclunent C, municipal golf courses; regional parks; and governmental facilities excluding essential
services as defined in the LDC The location of public schools shall be coordinated with the Collier
County School Board, based on the interlocal agreement 1633177 F.S. and in a manner consistent with
235,193 F,S, Schools and related ancillary uses shall be encouraged to locate in or proximate to Towns,
and Villages, aHa Hamlets subject to applicable zoning and pennitting requirements,
Staff analysis of the existing wording is that the acreages of "essential services" are not included when
calculating the acreage of public benefit uses,
"Essential Services: Those services and facilities, including utilities, safety services, and other
government services, necessary to promote and protect public health, safety and welfare,
including but not limited to the following: police; fire, emergency medical, public park and public
library facilities; and all services designed and operated to provide water, sewer, gas, telephone,
electricity, cable television or communications to the general public by providers that have been
approved and authorized according to laws having appropriate jurisdiction, and governmental
facilities.1I
[2] Page 68......,Overlav MaD.
The Overlay Map on page 68 is distorted through reductions and ;s the same map contained in the
Phase I ReDort [page 15J, A more accurate map [see attachedJ is on file and updated by the Mapping
Department in CDES and, IF RLSA/GMPAs are authorized by the BCC to proceed, the correct Overlay
Map will be used at that time.
[3] Page 70......Recommended amendment to Attachment A rStewardshiD Credit Worksheet!
The proposed amendment to the Stewardship Credit Worksheet on page 70 was stated to be incorrect
during the February 2d" CCPC meeting [a "typo"J. IF RLSA/GMPAs are authorized to proceed, the
correct amendment to Attachment A will be used. [see attachedJ
1lPage
(4) Page 72.......Attachment C [final and approved)
This page is correct [with the exception of the Policy 4.20 reference which should read Policy 4.21) ond
was adopted as port of the approval of the RLSA Overlay, The footnote ot the bottom of the page
states, "underlined uses are not required uses", which exploins why certoin words are underlined.
(5) Page 73......Attachment C [recommended amendment)
This page is correct [with the exception of the Policy 4,22 reference which should read Policy 4.21) and
was recommended by the Committee. The footnote at the bottom of the page stotes, "underlined
uses ore not required uses" which explains the reoson why certain words are underlined, IF
RLSA/GMPAs ore outhorized to proceed, the correct Policy reference in the footnotes will be used.
(6) Land Ownership Characteristics in the RLSA
A Plonning Commissioner requested informotion about lond ownership in the RLSA. Please find [see
ottochments) which were reviewed by the RLSA Review Committee in July, 2008:
(1) a mop showing locations of parcels of less thon 20 acres in size;
(2) RLSA ownership by acreage range
(3) Map showing general locations of mojor lond owners in the RLSA
(7) Where do landfills get placed in the RL5A?
If a landfill can be construed as 0 "essentiol service", then it could be permitted in any zoning district,
including the Ag district. There are no specific provisions for landfills in landfills in a Stewardship
Receiving Area [SRA).
ZIPage
GreenwoodThomas
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
bellows_r
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 2:40 PM
GreenwoodThomas
IstenesSusan; SawyerMichael
FW: Mr. Strain question about where a landfill could fit in the RLSA
Hi Tom,
A sanitary landfill is listed as a conditional use in the "P" Public Use Zoning District in the LDC, Therefore, a rezone to the
"P" zoning district and a CU would be required in order to allow a landfill in the RLSA since there are no properties
currently zoned "P" in this area.
In regards to a landfill being classified as an Essential Service in the RLSA, I have reviewed Section 2.01,03 of the LDC
and do not find that a landfill use listed as a permitted or an CU under the essential service provisions, In addition, Section
2,01.03.G,2 of the LDC (see below) pertaining to the RLSA designated HSA and FSA also has no provision to allow a
landfill in those areas,
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to ask,
Ray
Conditional essential services in RFMU sendina lands, NRPAs. CON districts. and RLSA desianated HSAs and FSAs,
Within RFMU District Sending Lands, NRPAs, CON districts, and the RFLA designated HSAs and FSAs subject to the
limitations set forth in section 4,08.08 C.2., in addition to the essential services identified as allowed conditional uses in
section 2.01.03 G.1. above, the following additional essential services are allowed as conditional uses:
a, Sewer lines and lift stations necessary to serve a publicly owned or privately owned central sewer system providing
service to urban areas; or the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, as delineated on the Urban-Rural Fringe
Transition Zone Overlay Map in the Future Land Use Element of the GMP, when not located within already cleared
portions of existing rights-of-way or easements; and
b. Safety Services limited to law enforcement, fire, and emergency medical services; and
c. Oil and gas field development and production, as defined and regulated in this Code, remains a conditional use on or
beneath Conservation Collier lands established in the CON zoning district subject to section 2,03,05 B.1 ,c,(1) of this
Code,
3. Additional conditional uses in residential, and estate zoned districts, and in RFMU receiving and neutral lands. In
residential, agricultural, and estate zoned districts and in RFMU Receiving and neutral lands, in addition to those essential
services identified as conditional uses in section 2.01,03 G.1. above, the following essential services shall also be allowed
as conditional uses:
a, Regional parks and community parks;
b. Public parks and public library facilities;
c, Safety service facilities;
d, Other similar facilities, except as otherwise specified herein,
Nancy:
Thanks, I will put this in my GMPA/RLSA folder in the event that this moves to GMPAs,
Tom
Thomas Greenwood, AICP
Principal Planner
Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FI. 34104
Direct Phone: 239-252-2323
Fax: 239-213-2946
Email: thomasareenwaod@collieraov.net
From: Nancy Payton [mailto:nancypayton@fwfonline.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:54 AM
To: GreenwoodThomas
Subject: RE: Dark Skies
Hello Tom,
Below is FWF's suggested redraft of the Dark Sky policy, It marries Nicole and
Mark's recommendations, Nancy
Policy 5.7
Any development on lands not participating in the RLS program shall be
compatible with surrounding land uses. Outdoor lighting shall be
managed to protect the nighttime environment, conserve energy, and enhance
safety and security. LDe outdoor lighting regulations using standards modeled
from the Dark Sky (www.darkskv.com) program shall be implemented within 12
months of the effective date of the Growth Management Plan amendments, The
outdoor lighting regulations shall be applicable to Group 3, 4, and 5 Policies,
-__>M~____~_'__..____~__.___,"~.__O____
From: nicole ryan [mailto:nicoler@conservancy,org]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:40 PM
To: Elizabeth Fleming; Laurie Macdonald; Nancy Payton
Subject: PN: Dark Skies
Elizabeth,
Sorry. I though I had copied you on this, which I sent to Mark on Friday,
Nicole
SOURCE: EXCERPT FROM SECTION 4,08.00 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF COLLIlER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
K, SRA Public Facilities Impact Assessments, Impact assessments are intended to identify methods
to be utilized to meet the SRA generated impacts on public facilities and to evaluate the self-sufficiency
of the proposed SRA with respect to these public facilities. Information provided within these
assessments may also indicate the degree to which the SRA is consistent with the fiscal neutrality
requirements of Section 4.08,07 L Impact assessments shall be prepared in the following infrastructure
areas:
L Transportation, A transportation impact assessment meeting the requirements of Chapter 10 of
the LDC or its successor regulation or procedure, shall be prepared by the applicant as component of an
Impact Assessment Report that is submitted as part of an SRA Designation Application package,
a, In addition to the standard requirements of the analyses required above, the transportation
impact assessment shall specifically consider, to the extent applicable, the following issues related to
the highway network:
(1) Impacts to the level of service of impacted roadways and intersections, comparing the proposed
SRA to the impacts of conventional Baseline Standard development;
(2) Effect(s) of new roadway facilities planned as part of the SRA Master Plan on the surrounding
transportation system; and
(3) Impacts to agri,transport issues, especially the farm-to,market movement of agricultural
products,
b, The transportation impact assessment, in addition to considering the impacts on the highway
system, shall also consider public transportation (transit) and bicycle and pedestrian issues to the extent
applicable.
c. No SRA shall be approved unless the transportation impact assessment required by this Section
has demonstrated through data and analysis that the capacity of County/State collector or arterial
road(s) serving the SRA to be adequate to serve the intended SRA uses in accordance with Chapter 6 of
the LDC in effect at the time of SRA designation.
2. Potable Water, A potable water assessment shall be prepared by the applicant as a component
of an Impact Assessment Report that is submitted as part of an SRA Designation Application package.
The assessment shall illustrate how the applicant will conform to either Florida Administrative Code for
private and limited use water systems, or for Public Water Systems, In addition to the standard
requirements of the analyses required above, the potable water assessment shall specifically consider,
to the extent applicable, the disposal of waste products, if any, generated by the proposed treatment
process. The applicant shall identify the sources of water proposed for potable water supply.
1
3. Irrigation Water, An irrigation water assessment shall be prepared by the applicant as a
component of an Impact Assessment Report that is submitted as part of an SRA Designation Application
package, The assessment shall quantify the anticipated irrigation water usage expected at the buildout
of the SRA, The assessment shall identify the sources of water proposed for irrigation use and shall
identify proposed methods of water conservation,
4, Wastewater. A wastewater assessment shall be prepared by the applicant as a component of an
Impact Assessment Report that is submitted as part of an SRA Designation Application package. The
assessment shall illustrate how the applicant will conform to either Standards for Onsite Sewage
Treatment and Disposal Systems, contained in Florida Administrative Code for systems having a capacity
not exceeding 10,000 gallons per day or for wastewater treatment systems having a capacity greater
than 10,000 gallons per day. In addition to the standard requirements of the analyses required above,
the wastewater assessment shall specifically consider, to the extent applicabie, the disposal of waste
products generated by the proposed treatment process,
S, Solid waste. A solid waste assessment shall be prepared by the applicant as a component of an
Impact Assessment Report that is submitted as part of an SRA Designation Application package. The
assessment shall identify the means and methods for handling, transporting and disposal of all solid
waste generated including but not limited to the collection, handling and disposal of recyclables and
horticultural waste products, The applicant shall identify the location and remaining disposal capacity
available at the disposal site,
6, Stormwater Management, A stormwater management impact assessment shall be prepared by
the applicant as a component of an Impact Assessment Report that is submitted as a part of an SRA
Designation Application Package, The stormwater management impact assessment shall, at a minimum,
provide the following information:
a. An exhibit showing the boundary of the proposed SRA including the following information:
(1) The location of any WRA delineated within the SRA;
(2) A generalized representation of the existing stormwater flow patterns across the site including
the location(s) of discharge from the site to the downstream receiving waters;
(3) The land uses of adjoining properties and, if applicable, the locations of stormwater discharge
into the site of the proposed SRA from the adjoining properties.
b, A narrative component to the report including the following information:
(1) The name of the receiving water or, if applicable, FSA or WRA to which the storm water
discharge from the site will ultimately outfall;
(2) The peak allowable discharge rate (in cfs / acre) allowed for the SRA per Collier County
Ordinance 90,10 or its successor regulation;
2
(3) If applicable, a description of the provisions to be made to accept stormwater flows from
surrounding properties into, around, or through the constructed surface water management system of
the proposed development;
(4) The types of stormwater detention areas to be constructed as part of the surface water
management system of the proposed development and water quality treatment to be provided prior to
discharge ofthe runoff from the site; and
(5) If a WRA has been incorporated into the stormwater management system of an SRA, the report
shall demonstrate compliance with provisions of Section 4.08,04 A.4.b,
7, Public Schools. The applicant shall coordinate with the Collier County School Board to provide
information and coordinate planning to accommodate any impacts that the SRA has on public schools,
As part of the SRA application, the following information shall be provided:
a. Number of residential units by type;
b. An estimate of the number of school,aged children for each type of school impacted
(elementary, middle, high school); and
Co The potential for locating a public educational facility or facilities within the SRA, and the sites of
any sites that may be dedicated or otherwise made available for a public educational facility.
L. SRA Economic Assessment. An Economic Assessment meeting the requirements of this Section
shall be prepared and submitted as part of the SRA Designation Application Package. At a minimum, the
analysis shall consider the following public facilities and services: transportation, potable water,
wastewater, irrigation water, storm water management, solid waste, parks, law enforcement,
emergency medical services, fire, and schools, Development phasing and funding mechanisms shall
address any adverse impacts to adopted minimum levels of service pursuant to the Chapter 6 of the
LOC.
L Demonstration of Fiscal Neutrality. Each SRA must demonstrate that its development, as a
whole, will be fiscally neutral or positive to the Collier County tax base, at the end of each phase, or
every five (5) years, whichever occurs first, and in the horizon year (build,out). This demonstration will
be made for each unit of government responsible for the services listed below, using one of the
following methodologies:
a. Collier County Fiscal Impact Model. The fiscal impact model officially adopted and maintained by
Collier County.
b, Alternative Fiscal Impact Model. If Collier County has not adopted a fiscal impact model as
indicated above, the applicant may develop an alternative fiscal impact model using a methodology
approved by Collier County. The BCC may grant exceptions to this policy of fiscal neutrality to
accommodate affordable or workforce housing,
3
2. Monitoring Requirement, To assure fiscal neutrality, the developer of the SRA shall submit to
Collier County a fiscal impact analysis report ("Report") every five (5) years until the SRA is ninety (90)
percent built out. The Report will provide a fiscal impact analysis of the project in accord with the
methodology outlined above.
3, Imposition of Special Assessments. If the Report identifies a negative fiscal impact of the project
to a unit of local government referenced above, the landowner will accede to a special assessment on
his property to offset such a shortfall or in the alternative make a lump sum payment to the unit of local
government equal to the present value of the estimated shortfall for a period covering the previous
phase (or five year interval), The BCC may grant a waiver to accommodate affordable housing.
4. Special Districts Encouraged in SRAs, The use of community development districts (COOs),
Municipal Service Benefit Units (MSBUs), Municipal Service Taxing Units (M5TUs), or other special
districts shall be encouraged in SRAs, When formed, the special districts shall encompass all of the land
designated for development in the SRA. Subsequent to formation, the special district will enter into an
Interlocal agreement with the County to assure fiscal neutrality, As outlined above, if the monitoring
reveals a shortfall of net revenue, the special district will impose the necessary remedial assessment on
lands in the SRA.
M. The BCC may, as a condition of approval and adoption of an SRA development, require that
suitable areas for parks, schools, and other public facilities be set aside, improved, and/or dedicated for
public use. When the BCC requires such a set aside for one or more public facilities, the set aside shall be
subject to section 2,03.06, in the same manner as are public facility dedications required as a condition
of PUD rezoning,
4
Rober! J. Kawula, Ph.D.
2960 Glen lves Drive
Tallahassee. FL 32312
(Home) 850-385-3226
(Work) 850-488-8905
[-mail: rkawula(f.lembarqmail.com
EDUCATION:
Ph.D. Southern Illinois University/Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory
Carbondale, Illinois 6290 I
Major: Zoology
Specialization: Wildlife Habitat Analysis and Evaluation.l Waterfowl Ecology
Secondary Area: Biostatistics
February 1993 - December 1998
M.S Frosthurg State UnivefSlty/UMCES - Appalachian Laboratory
Frostburg, Maryland 21532
Major: Wildlife Management
May 1989 - December 1992
B.S. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481
Majors: Biology and Wildlife Management
Minor: Forestry
September 1983 - May 1988
Ashwaubcnon High School
Green Bay, Wisconsin 54304
September 1979 - June 1983
WORK
EXPERIENCES:
Biological Scientist IV
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Wildlife Research Institute,
2574 Seagate Drive, Suite 250, Tallahassee, FL 32301
Supervisor: Ms. Beth Stys
Phone: (850) 488-0588
September 1997 - Present
Develop statewide species models on Threatened, Endangered, or Special Concern species based
on the life history, population ecology, habitat requirements, and dispersal patlems. Create
spatially accurate distribution maps for listed fish and wildlife species and critical habitats. Obtain
and integrate wildlife species and habitat information into a geographical infomlation system
(GIS). Perform GIS/statistical analyses to identify terrestrial, wetland and aquatic habitats
important to listed species. Contributing member of numerous wildlife research projects that
currently include Florida panther habitat use and movements using GPS and YHF radio telemetry
and analysis of large mammal road crossings. Write progress reports, technical reports, and peer
reviewed manuscripts for publication of project results, conclusions, and management
implications. Provide teclmical assistance to other projects and programs within the agency.
Evaluate, support, and coordinate data acquisition for field biologists as requested. Member of
CURRICULUM VITAE
Thomas Scott Hoctor, Ph.D.
Director of the Center for Landscape and Conservation Planning
College of Design, Construction and Planning
University of Florida
Research Program Director
Department of Landscape Architecture
University of Florida
Research Associate, GeoPlan Center
Department of Urban and Regional Planning
University of Florida
clo Department of Landscape Architecture
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL, 32611
phone: 352-392-5037
e-mail: tomh@geoplan.ufl.edu
EDUCATION
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
2003. Received Ph.D. in Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation. Dissertation title:
Regional landscape analysis and reserve design to conserve Florida's biodiversity.
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
1992. Completed a Master of Forest Resources and Conservation degree specializing in
conservation biology and policy. Major course work included conservation biology, wetland and
aquatic systems conservation, landscape ecology, and resource policy and management. Wrote
technical paper on the application of buffer zone concepts to reserve design.
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
1989. Received a B.A. in History and Science in June 1989. Emphasis was on biology
and American history in course work. Graduated summa cum laude in major with a 3.85 grade
point average and a 3.65 overall. Wrote senior thesis on the history of early American fish
culture and the involvement of anglers. Received a Harvard College Scholarship and a
John Winthrop Scholarship for academic achievement through 1987-1989.
Astronaut High School, Titusville, FL
1985. Class valedictorian. All-state in football and All-district in tennis.
AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AND SKILLS
. Regional landscape ecological analysis and conservation planning
. Ecological reserve network design
. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) spatial analysis using Arc-Info, ArcView, and ArcGlS
. Large carnivore ecology and conservation
. Identification of Florida natural communities
. Identification of North American bird species through sight and song
I
'--.--..-
,-
,--
._0._'__."_'.'
^,"'_.,_.-Mw,..
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Principal Investigator, Regional Gopher Tortoise Habitat Modeling Project, 2009-. Working with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a GIS assessment of potential gopher tortoise habitat in Florida,
Georgia, and part of Alabama. Work includes identification of best potential habitat including areas
that may be suitable for land protection strategies such as mitigation banking.
Principal Investigator, Identification of Connectivity Issues and Strategies for Babcock Ranch Project,
2009-. Working with Reed Noss of the University of Central Florida to develop recommendations for
maintaining and restoring functional ecological connectivity between Babcock Ranch and other
existing conservation areas in the southwest Florida region. Work includes review of existing reports
and data; development of GIS habitat and connectivity models for the Florida black bear, Florida
panther, and Sherman's fox squirrel; identification of issues with road crossings; and the development
ofrecomrnendations to further study and protect regional ecological connectivity.
Principal Investigator, Southwest Florida Water Management District Conservation Land Acquisition Re-
assessment, 2008-. Working with the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Wildlands
Conservation to develop a new GIS methodology for identifYing conservation land acquisition
priorities, Work included the development ofa new GIS model integrating data from the Critical
Lands and Waters Identification Project and various regional data to identify conservation priorities.
Principal Investigator, Cooperative Conservation Blueprint Project, 2008-. Working with the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission and other partners to adapt the Critical Lands and Waters
Identification Project conservation priorities to development ofa state conservation vision. Work
includes development of additional GIS analysis to inform the development of the blueprint including
proposed new conservation incentives programs.
Habitat Modeler, Swallow-tailed Kite Regional Habitat Analysis Project. 2008-. Working with Ken Meyer
from Avian Research and Conservation Institute, Inc. and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to identifY
Swallow-tailed Kite habitat in Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. Work includes the development
of GIS habitat models that identifY potential habitat and habitat quality using land use data and known
kite nesting locations.
Principal Investigator, Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project, 2006-. Working with the Florida
Natural Areas Inventory and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to identifY statewide
biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation priorities for the Florida Century Commission. The
Century Commission is a legislatively created advisory body to asked to identifY strategies to protect
Florida's natural resources despite continued human population continues growth.
Assistant, Development of Species Occurrence Database, 2006-. Working with the GeoPlan Center at the
University of Florida to collect additional occurrence data for various focal species in Florida to use in
the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Model (ETDM) created for the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection. ETDM is an online impact review application that allows relevant agency
staff and the public to review the potential environmental and social impacts of proposed transportation
infrastructure projects.
Greenways Program Coordinator, Conservation Trust for Florida, 2005-. Working with the Conservation
Trust for Florida to implement protection of priority landscape linkages in Florida,
Co-principal Investigator, Impacts Assessment Decision Support Model Project for the Southwest Florida
Water Management District, 2002-. Working with the SWFWMD to develop a GIS-based decision
support model that can be used to assess the potential impacts of proposed activities on SWFWMD-
owned lands.
Co-Principal Investigator, Florida Greenways Modeling Project, 1995-. Working with the University of
Florida Department of Landscape Architecture and the GeoPlan Center to develop and conduct a GIS
model to identify an integrated statewide conservation system for Florida; to prioritize identified areas;
to revise the model results as new infonnation becomes available, and to protect critical landscapes.
Principal Investigator, Development of GIS database of priority conservation areas, vertebrate species
habitat, wildlife corridors, conservation lands buffers, and priority watershed protection areas for the
Lake Wales Ridge, 7007-2008, Worked with The Nature Conservancy and Archbold Biological Station
to identify the most important conservation priority areas and supporting lands and waters needed to
maintain the ecological integrity of conservation lands within the Lake Wales Ridge Region of central
Florida.
2
Principal Investigator, Identification of Corridor Options for the Florida Black Bear in the Wekiva River
Basin, 2007-2008. Worked with The Nature Conservancy to identifY key parcels for completing a
functional bear corridor between the Ocala National Forest and protected lands in the Wekiva River
Basin north of Orlando using GIS habitat analysis, parcel and aerial photography data, and surveys of
road crossings.
Principal Investigator, development of Florida black bear habitat models, 2005-2006. Working with the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to develop statewide rules-based and statistical
habitat models for the Florida black bear. These models will be used to develop habitat conservation
recommendations for the Florida black bear to ensure its viability.
Consultant with Pandion Systems, 2005. Developed GIS habitat models for the Florida black bear and
gopher tortoise for an environmental assessment application in Volusia County, Florida.
Contractor with the University of Central Florida, 2004-2005. Worked with Dr. Reed Noss to develop GIS
habitat models for various focal vertebrate species to identifY priority habitat and wildlife corridors in
the western Florida panhandle.
Contractor with the Florida Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, 2004-2005. Developing GIS ecological
threat indices for the state of Florida as part of Florida's Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation
Strategy planning process.
Co-principal Investigator, development of recommendations and tools to facilitate regional ecological
assessments in all U.S. EPA regions, 2003-2004. Worked with Region 4 EPA and the EPA Office of
Policy, Economics, and Innovation to survey existing regional assessment efforts and develop
guidelines that can be used to conduct regional assessments of areas critical for conserving biodiversity
and ecosystem services.
Co-principal investigator, 2003-2004. Worked with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and U. S.
Department of Defense to identifY listed species and natural resource conservation opportunities on
lands surrounding eleven military bases in the Piedmont ecoregion of Georgia, South Carolina, and
North Carolina.
Consultant with Pandion Systems, 2003-2004. Conducted assessment ofland conservation priorities for the
St. Lucie County land conservation program.
Co-principal Investigator, identification of reserve options for protecting federally listed species in South
Florida, 2002-2003. Worked with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Frank Mazzotti et al. from
the University of Florida to update habitat models for listed species and develop reserve options and
priorities for conserving all federally listed species while maximizing benefits to the region's overall
biodiversity.
Consultant with Pandion Systems, 2001-2002. Developed landscape assessments and potential natural
vegetation information to evaluate the significance of lands for conserving biological diversity within
St. Johns County.
Landscape ecologist, landscape analysis of Florida panther habitat, 2000-2002. Worked with the University
of Kentucky on a GIS spatial analysis of potential habitat and landscape connectivity for the Florida
panther in south and south-central Florida.
Contractor working with the Florida Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, 1999-2002. Conducted an
ecoregional analysis of biological diversity to identifY priority conservation areas in peninsular Florida
using expert workshops and GIS.
Consultant with Pandion Systems, 1999-2002. Advised consulting team on GIS spatial landscape and
species indices modeling for the Wekiva River basin. The goal was to develop a GIS model that
predicts ecological impacts of proposed development in and near the Wekiva River basin.
Co-Principal Investigator, analysis of Florida black bear habitat and landscape management for the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 1999-2000. Worked with the University of Kentucky on
a literature review of black bear ecology and Florida ecosystem dynamics to develop habitat and
landscape management recommendations for the Florida black bear.
Co-Principal Investigator, EPA Southeastern Region Landscape Ecological Analysis Project, University of
Florida, 1998-2002. Conducted a GIS analysis and identification of ecologically significant areas and
connectivity in the southeast region of the United States including Florida, Georgia, Alabama,
Mississippi, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Kentucky.
Landscape ecologist, Chassahowitzka black bear landscape analysis, University of Florida, 1998-200 I.
Worked with the University of Kentucky and the Southwest Florida Water Management District to
3
".~-~-,_._~~~-,_._._" ,
P" ,._ __'_'_."_'___'_'
-~~--" ,...., , -.-...,----
conduct a GIS habitat analysis for the Chassahowitzka population of the Florida black bear to
determine potential habitat availability and connectivity to other bear populations.
Contractor, Indian River County Conservation Priorities Study, Conway Conservation, Inc., 1998-1999.
Conducted a GIS analysis of ecological features in Indian River County, Florida to identify priority
areas for county conservation lands acquisition program.
Field Assistant, Conway Conservation, Inc., 1995- I 996. Conducted land cover groundtruthing for a GIS
Land Use/Cover Mapping for the Suwannee River Water Management District. Member offield team
verifying photo-interpretation for land use/cover mapping.
Research Assistant, University of Florida, 1995. Conducted an ecological contextual analysis for the Camp
Blanding Military Site, Florida Department of Military Affairs. Involved GIS spatial analysis using
ARC-Info to identify priority conservation landscape features in and near Camp Blanding.
Field Assistant, University of Florida, 199?-1995. Surveyed bird populations in research project on impacts
of clear cutting on bird usage of cypress ponds.
Research Assistant, University of Florida, 1993. Restoration Ecology/Sciences program development
research. Worked with the Department of Wildlife Ecology Chair on background research for
development of a restoration ecology/sciences program.
Project Supervisor of the wildlife team for the Cross-Florida Greenway study, University of Florida, 1991-
1992. Developed design criteria for wildlife corridor along 150 miles of barge canal lands through
north central Florida. Coordinated field work, literature reviews, mapping, and report writing. Co-
authored final report on biological issues.
Independent Researcher, 1992. Quantified negative edge effects in several Florida ecosystems. Investigated
negative edge effect intensity by placing artificial ground nests in transects near different ecosystem
edge types on San Felasco State Preserve and the Cross-Florida Greenway.
Research Assistant, University of Florida, 1989-1990. Formulated recommendations for buffering state
parks from outside threats. Also helped develop a comprehensive bibliography on reserve and park
design criteria.
Research Assistant, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 1989. Conducted experiment
on cichlid development and functional feeding morphology that became basis of lab experiment in a
biology course at Harvard,
Assistant to the Curator of the research ornithological collection, Harvard University, 1986-1989.
TEACHING AND ADVISING EXPERIENCE
Co-Course Instructor, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Florida Conservation
Planning Manual, February 2009, Helping FWC staff teach a half day course on conservation planning
as part of the development of their draft Conservation Planning Manual.
Co-Course Instructor, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Spring
2007. Co-taught graduate landscape ecology class including theory, application, and GIS tools.
Co-Course Instructor, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, Spring 2006-2007.
Co-taught graduate GIS and regional conservation planning studio for the Department of Landscape
Architecture and Department of Urban and Regional Planning.
Course Assistant, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, Spring 2006-2007.
Lectured in landscape ecology and conservation biology to a combined undergraduate and graduate
course in landscape management.
Co-Course Instructor, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, Fall 2006. Co-taught
undergraduate GIS analysis studio for the Department of Landscape Architecture.
Teaching Assistant and Lecturer, Departments of Landscape Architecture and Urban and Regional
Planning, University of Florida, 1994-2005. Served as a teaching assistant in various undergraduate
and graduate studio courses on regional landscape design and the use afGIS in regional conservation
planning.
Co-Course Instructor, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, Fall 2001. Co-taught
senior -level undergraduate environmental design studio using GIS to develop regional and local land
use and master plans.
4
Co-Course Developer, National Conservation Training Center, Sheperdstown, WV, 200 I. Helped develop
a course in Green Infrastructure Planning taught at the National Conservation Training Center.
Co-Course Instructor, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation and Department of Landscape
Architecture, University of Florida, 1999-2000. Co-taught two undergraduate courses in landscape
ecology including lectures, GIS labs, and a GIS project.
Co-Course Instructor, National Conservation Training Center, Sheperdstown, WV, 1998. Taught module
on the application oflandscape ecology and conservation biology to regional conservation planning in
a course titled "GIS Design for Regional Conservation Planning". Also presented the Florida
Ecological Greenways Decision Support Model and GIS analyses used in the project.
Teaching Assistant, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 1997.
Supervised and coordinated course project on a regional landscape conservation application in a
graduate landscape ecology course.
Teaching Assistant, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 1990-1994.
Served as a teaching assistant in four semesters of the undergraduate class, Wildlife Issues.
Resident Advisor, Athletic Dormitory, University Athletic Association, University of Florida, 1989-1995.
CONTRACTS AND GRA NTS
Principal Investigator, Regional Gopher Tortoise Habitat Modeling Project, 2008-. Working with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a GIS assessment of potential gopher tortoise habitat in Florida,
Georgia, and part of Alabama. Work includes identification of best potential habitat including areas
that may be suitable for land protection strategies such as mitigation banking. Funding to date:
$50,000.
Principal Investigator, Identification of Connectivity Issues and Strategies for Babcock Ranch Project,
2008-. Working with Reed Noss of the University of Central Florida to develop recommendations for
maintaining and restoring functional ecological connectivity between Babcock Ranch and other
existing conservation areas in the southwest Florida region. Work includes review of existing reports
and data; development of GIS habitat and connectivity models for the Florida black bear, Florida
panther, and Sherman's fox squirrel; identification of issues with road crossings; and the development
of recommendations to further study and protect regional ecological connectivity. Funding to date:
$34,375.
Principal Investigator, Southwest Florida Water Management District Conservation Land Acquisition Re-
assessment, 2008-. Working with the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Wildlands
Conservation to develop a new GIS methodology for identifYing conservation land acquisition
priorities. Work included the development ofa new GIS model integrating data from the Critical
Lands and Waters Identification Project and various regional data to identifY conservation priorities.
Funding to date: $40,000.
Principal Investigator, Cooperative Conservation Blueprint Project, 2008-. Working with the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission and other partners to adapt the Critical Lands and Waters
Identification Project conservation priorities to development of a state conservation vision. Work
includes development of additional GIS analysis to inform the development of the blueprint including
proposed new conservation incentives programs. Funding to date: $24,000.
Habitat Modeler, Swallow-tailed Kite Regional Habitat Analysis Project. 2008-. Working with Ken Meyer
from Avian Research and Conservation Institute, Inc. and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to identifY
Swallow-tailed Kite habitat in Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. Work includes the development
of GIS habitat models that identifY potential habitat and habitat quality using land use data and know
kite nesting locations. Funding to date: $15,000.
Principal Investigator, Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project, 2006-. Working with the Florida
Natural Areas Inventory and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to identifY statewide
biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation priorities for the Florida Century Commission. The
Century Commission is a legislatively created advisory body to identifY strategies to protect Florida's
natural resources while human population continues to grow. Funding to date: $55,000.
Co-principal Investigator, development of an impacts assessment decision support model for the Southwest
Florida Water Management District, 2002-. Working with the SWFWMD to develop a GIS-based
5
'_~._.___~_,..,,_,_ M_ _
- '-'--'~'~___~_"___'_"".'~~"_____'~"__"~~____"_'" ".0_ "___"'M._
decision support model that can be used to assess the potential impacts of proposed activities on
SWFWMD-owned lands. Funding to date: $340,000.
Co-Principal Investigator, Florida Greenways Modeling Project, 1995-. Working with the University of
Florida Department of Landscape Architecture and the GeoPlan Center to develop and conduct a GIS
model to identify an integrated statewide conservation system for Florida; to prioritize identified areas;
to revise the model results as new information becomes available, and to protect critical landscapes.
Funding to date: approximately $2,500,000.
Principal Investigator, Development of GIS database of priority conservation areas, vertebrate species
habitat, wildlife corridors, conservation lands butfers, and priority watershed protection areas for the
Lake Wales Ridge. 2007-2008. Worked with The Nature Conservancy and Archbold Biological Station
to identify the most important conservation priority areas and supporting lands and waters needed to
maintain the ecological integrity of conservation lands within the Lake Wales Ridge Region of central
Florida. Funding: $15,000.
Principal Investigator, Identification of Corridor Options for the Florida Black Bear in the Wekiva River
Basin, 2007-. Working with The Nature Conservancy to identify key parcels for completing a
functional bear corridor between the Ocala National Forest and protected lands in the Wekiva River
Basin north of Orlando using GIS habitat analysis, parcel and aerial photography data, and surveys of
road crossings. Funding: $15.000.
Principal Investigator, development of Florida black bear habitat models, 2005-2006. Working with the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to develop statewide rules-based and statistical
habitat models for the Florida black bear. These models will be used to develop habitat conservation
recommendations for the Florida black bear that will ensure its viability. Funding: $10,000.
Co-principal Investigator, development of recommendations and tools to facilitate regional ecological
assessments in all U.S. EPA regions, 2003-2004. Worked with Region 4 EPA and the EPA Office of
Policy, Economics, and Innovation to survey existing regional assessment efforts and develop
guidelines that can be used to conduct regional assessments of areas critical for conserving biodiversity
and ecosystem services. Funding: $50,000.
Co-principal investigator, 2003-2004. Working with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and U. S.
Department of Defense to identify listed species and natural resource conservation opportunities on
lands surrounding eleven military bases in the Piedmont ecoregion of Georgia, South Carolina, and
North Carolina. Funding: $20,000.
Co-principal Investigator, identification of reserve options for protecting federally listed species in South
Florida, 2002-2003. Worked with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Frank Mazzotti et al. from
the University of Florida to update habitat models for listed species and develop reserve options and
priorities for conserving all federally listed species while maximizing benefits to the region's overall
biodiversity. Funding: $15,000,
Landscape ecologist, landscape analysis of Florida panther habitat, 2000-2002. Worked with the University
of Kentucky on a GIS spatial analysis of potential habitat and landscape connectivity for the Florida
panther in south and south-central Florida. Funding: $3,000,
Co-Principal Investigator, EPA Southeastern Region Landscape Ecological Analysis Project, University of
Florida, 1998-2002. Conducted a GIS analysis and identification of ecologically significant areas and
connectivity in the southeast region of the United States including Florida, Georgia, Alabama,
Mississippi, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Kentucky. Funding: $355,000.
Co-Principal Investigator, analysis of Florida black bear habitat and landscape management for the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 1999-2000. Worked with the University of Kentucky on
a literature review of black bear ecology and Florida ecosystem dynamics to develop habitat and
landscape management recommendations for the Florida black bear. Funding: $5,400.
Landscape ecologist, Chassahowitzka black bear landscape analysis, University of Florida, 1998-200 I.
Worked with the University of Kentucky and the Southwest Florida Water Management District to
conduct a GIS habitat analysis for the Chassahowitzka population of the Florida black bear to
determine potential habitat availability and connectivity to other bear populations. Funding: $5,000.
6
ASSOCIATIONS
. Society for Conservation Biology
. International Association for Landscape Ecology
. Natural Areas Association
. Sigma Xi
. Advisory Board, Florida Defenders of the Environment
BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND PANELS
. Editorial Board, Journal of Conservation Planning
. Editorial Board, Environmental Bioindicators journal
. Vice Chair of the Alachua County Land Conservation Board, which is in charge of selecting conservation
lands to purchase under the Alachua Forever land conservation program.
. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's South Florida Multi-species/Ecosystem Recovery Implementation Team
(MERIT), 2000-2002, Chair of the Landscape Subteam responsible for developing reserve design
strategies for listed species in South Florida.
. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's MERIT sub-team for identifYing essential habitat and conservation
strategies for the Florida panther, 2000-2002.
. Served on an advisory group working with Florida Natural Areas Inventory to develop methods to
prioritize potential conservation land acquisitions for the Florida Forever program, 2000-2002.
. Biodiversity Conservation Goals Panel for the Florida Forever Advisory Council, 2000
. Committee Member, Interstate 4 Ecological Impact Review Team, 1995-1997
. Committee Member, State Road 40 EIS Review Team, 1995- I 996
. Designee for Dr. Larry Harris on the Florida Greenways Commission, 1992- I 995
. Ecological Consultant, Hillsborough County Development Code, 1993
MISCELLANEOUS
. Peer-reviewed proposals for the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in 2005 and 2006.
. Peer-reviewed articles for the journals Conservation Biology, BioScience, Journal of Wildlife
Management, Southeastern Naturalist, Conservation Planning, Landscape Ecology, Landscape and
Urban Planning, Ecological Modeling, Environmental Management, and Environmental
Bioindicators.
. Expert witness for the Sierra Club on the ecological impacts of the proposed changes to the Alachua
County Comprehensive Plan in administrative hearing process in December 2003.
. Served as expert on wildlife corridors for team working to get the San Felasco-Sante Fe Conservation
Corridor project included in the Alachua County, FL conservation land acquisition program, Spring,
2002.
. Expert witness for the St. Johns County Sierra Club on the ecological impacts of the proposed Nocatee
development in St. Johns County, FL in administrative hearing process, October 2001.
. Expert witness on the ecological impacts of a proposed school within the Etoniah Creek CARL Project in
Putnam County, FL in administrative hearing process, Spring 2001.
. Advisor on the ecological impacts of the Suncoast Parkway in west-central Florida to legal team in lawsuit
against the Corps of Engineers.
. Co-sponsored with Richard Hilsenbeck of the Florida Chapter of The Nature Conservancy the addition of
the Lecanto Sandhills and OTOW Sandhi lis to the LongleafPine Ecosystem CARL Project in the
Florida Preservation 2000 land acquisition program.
. Hosted a conservation biology class from Karlstad University in Sweden while they were visiting
Gainesville in November 1998 and 1999, which included lectures on reserve design and field trips to
local reserves.
. Reviewed reserve design lab exercise for a landscape ecology lab manual, Learning Landscape Ecology:
A Practical Guide to Concepts and Techniques, written by Sarah Gergel and Monica Turner at the
University of Wisconsin, spring 1999.
7
--'.'''-_.'.-._..._.~._.."....-.._....-
.~
- . ._~".~~_.-."." -
.. .~. '_".__"__"~'__'_~,_~,.~'.,...,__.__w.~.
. Invited participant for the Endangered Cats of North America Workshop sponsored by the National
Wildlife Federation at White Oak Plantation, FL, February 4-6, 2000.
. Took course in spring 1992 on college teaching methods.
. Travel experience in Costa Rica, southwestern U.S., Alaska. California, Arizona, Colorado, Alberta and
eastern Canada; extensive knowledge of the natural history of Florida, Maine, and southern California
. Recreational interests include fishing, birding, hiking, and camping.
PUBLICATIONS
Journal Articles
Hoctor, T. S., W. L. Allen, III, M. H. Carr, P. D. Zwick, E. Huntley, D. J. Smith, D. S. Maehr, R. Buch, and
R. Hilsenbeck. 2008. Land corridors in the Southeast USA: connectivity to protect biodiversity and
ecosystem services. Journal of Conservation Planning 4:90-122.
Kautz, R., Kawula, R" Hoctor, T., Comiskey, J., Jansen, D., Jennings, D., Kasbohm, J., Mazzotti, F.,
McBride, R., Richardson, L., and Root, K. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation
for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation 130: 118-133.
Maehr, D.S., P. Crowley, J.J. Cox, M.L. Lacki, J.L. Larkin, T.S, Hoctor, L.D. Harris, and P.M. Hall. 2006.
Of cats and Haruspices: genetic intervention in the Florida panther. Animal Conservation 9:127-132.
Maehr, D.S., J.N. Layne, T.S. Hoctor, and M.A. Orlando. 2004. Status of the black bear in south-central
Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 32:85-10 I.
Larkin, 1. L., D. S. Maehr, T. S. Hoctor, M. A. Orlando, and K. Whitney. 2004. Landscape linkages and
conservation planning for the black bear in west-central Florida. Animal Conservation 7:23-34.
Maehr, David S" E, Darrell Land, David B. Shindle, Oron L. Bass. Thomas S. Hoctor. 2002. Florida
panther dispersal and conservation. Biological Conservation 106: 187- I 97.
Hoctor, Thomas S., M. Carr. and P. Zwick. 2000. IdentilYing a linked reserve system using a regional
landscape approach: the Florida ecological network. Conservation Biology 14(4): 984-1000.
Book Chapters
Hoctor, Thomas S., L. D. Harris, R. F. Noss, and K. A. Whitney, 2006. Spatial ecology and restoration of
the longleafpine evosystem. Pages 377-402 In S. Jose, E. Jokela and D. Miller, editors. Longleafpine
ecosystems: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hoctor, Thomas S., M. Carr, P. Zwick, and D. S. Maehr. 2004. Identification and realization of a Florida
Ecological Network: the Florida Statewide Greenways Project and its political context. Pages 222-250
in R. H. G. Jongman and G. Pungetti, editors. Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design,
implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Maehr, D, S., R. C. Lacy, E. D. Land, O. L. Bass, and T. S. Hoctor. 2002. Population viability of the
Florida panther: a multi-perspective approach. Pages 284-3 11 in D. McCullough and S. Beissinger,
editors. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Harris, L. D., Linda C. Duever, Rebecca P. Meegan, Thomas S, Hoctor, James L. Schortemeyer, and David
S. Maehr. 2001. The biotic province as the minimum critical unit for biodiversity conservation. D. S.
Maehr, R.F. Noss, and J.L. Larkin, editors. Large mammal restoration: Ecological and sociological
considerations. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Maehr, David S, Thomas S. Hoctor, and L. D. Harris. 2001. The Florida panther: a flagship for regional
restoration. Pages 293-312 in D. S. Maehr, R. F. Noss, and J. L. Larkin, editors. Large mammal
restoration: ecological and sociological challenges in the 21" century. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Harris, Larry D., Thomas Hoctor, Dave Maehr, and Jim Sanderson. 1996. The role of networks and
corridors in enhancing the value and protection of parks and equivalent areas. Pages 173-198 in R. G.
Wright, editor. National parks and protected areas: their role in environmental areas. Blackwell
Science, Cambridge, MA.
Harris, Larry D., Thomas S. Hoctor, and Sarah E. Gergel. 1996. Landscape processes and their significance
to biodiversity conservation. Pages 319-347 in O.E. Rhodes, R. K. Chesser and M. H. Smith, editors.
Population dynamics in ecological space and time. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Hall, Phil M., Larry D. Harris, and Thomas S. Hoctor. 1994. Integrating outdoor recreation and wildlife
conservation with right-of-way/greenway corridors. Pages 195-229 in Hay, K.G. editor. Greenways,
wildlife and natural pipeline corridors. The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA. 229 pp.
8
Conference Proceedings
Maehr, D. S., T. S. Hoctor, and L. D. Harris. 2000. Remedies for a denatured landscape: restoring
landscapes for native carnivores. Proceedings of the International Congress on Wildlife Management
2.
Carr, Margaret H., Thomas S. Hoctor, and Paul D. Zwick. 1998. Connections at the crossroads: the Florida
greenways experiment. Proceedings of the 4'" Annual Public Interest Environmental Conference,
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Carr, Margaret H., Paul D. Zwick, Thomas S. Hoctor, Wesley Harrell, Andrea Goethals, and Mark A.
Benedict. 1998. Using GIS for identifying the interface between ecological greenways and roadway
systems at the state and sub-state scales. Pp. 68-77 In: Proceedings of The International Conference on
Wildlife Ecology and Transportation. Ft. Myers, FL.
Non Refereed Publications
Zwick, P. D., J. Teisinger, M. Carr, R Steiner and T. Hoctor, "Where will we Grow? Development of a
Florida Growth Potential Model", Florida Engineering Journal, Tallahassee, FL, November, 2002
Technical Reports
Hoctor, T.S., J. Oetting, and S. Beyeler. 2008. Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project: Report on
completion of the CLIP Version 1.0 Database. Report for the Century Commission for a Sustainable
Florida, Tallahassee.
Lozar, R. c., Ehlschlaeger, C., J. Westervelt, H. Balbach, H.R. Akcakaya, T. Hoctor, C. Goodison, W.W.
Hargrove, F.M. Hoffinan, and W. Rose. 2006. Habitat fragmentation handbook for installation
planners: Status and options. U.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development
Center, TR-06-36.
Hoctor, T., M. Carr, and 1. Teisinger. 2005. Reprioritization of the Florida Ecological Greenways Network
based on the New Base Boundaries Adopted in 2004. final Report. Office of Greenways and Trails,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee.
Hoctor, T. 2004. Update of the Florida Ecological Greenways Network. Final Report. Office of Greenways
and Trails, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee.
Hoctor, T. Ginevra Lewis, and Matt Marsik. 2004. Protecting Critical Ecosystems: Current EPA Regional
Activities and Future Agency Opportunities. Final Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Policy and Economic Innovation, Washington, D.C.
Hoctor, T. S., M. H. Carr, C. Goodison, P. D. Zwick, J. Green, P. Hernandez, C. McCain, K. Whitney, and
J. Teisinger. 2002. Final report: Southeastern Ecological Framework. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia.
Hoctor, T. S., J. Teisinger, M. H. Carr, P. D. Zwick. 2002. Identification of Critical Linkages within the
Florida Ecological Greenways Network. Final Report. Office of Greenways and Trails, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection. Tallahassee.
Carr, Margaret H., Thomas S. Hoctor, Paul D. Zwick, Christy McCain, Ryan Morrell and Jason Teisinger.
2002. A Report on Tasks Completed for the Florida Office of Greenways and Trails 200 I - 2002,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee.
Carr, Margaret H., Thomas S. Hoctor, Crystal Goodison, Paul D. Zwick, et al. 2002. Southeastern
Ecological Framework, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta.
Maehr, David S., Thomas S. Hoctor, Luther J. Quinn, and Judy S. Smith. 2001. Black bear habitat
management guidelines for Florida. Technical Report No. 17. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission, Tallahassee, FL.
Hoctor, Thomas S., Jason Teisinger, Margaret H. Carr and Paul D. Zwick. 2001. Ecological Greenways
Network Prioritization for the State of Florida, Florida Department of Environmental Protection,
Tallahassee.
Carr, Margaret H., Paul D. Zwick, Thomas Hoctor and Mark A. Benedict. 1999. Final Report - Phase 11-
Florida Statewide Greenways System Planning Project, Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, Tallahassee.
9
'-'dY_'>_~"...,'_,__W~_"_______."_,....__".,, .....____'_ ___...._,._.~.~._,,__, ..",,,. ..... '~'"_'''__~__'''~"_'~~~_''__ ...___._......._....._.._.,
Margaret H. Carr, Paul D. Zwick, Thomas Hoctor and Mark A. Benedict. 1998. Interim Report - Phase 11 -
Florida Statewide Greenways System Planning Project, Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, Tallahassee.
Carr, Margaret H., Paul D. Zwick, Thomas Hoctor and Mark A. Benedict. 1996. Final Report - Phase I -
Florida Statewide Greenways System Planning Project, Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, Tallahassee.
Hoctor, Thomas S., and Larry D. Harris, primary authors. 1995. Conserving native ecosystems and
landscapes. Pages 53-65 in Florida Greenways Commission. Florida Greenways: Creating a Statewide
Florida Greenway Network, The Florida Greenways Commission, Tallahassee, FL.
Harris, Larry D. and Thomas S. Hoctor. 1992. Cross Florida Greenbelt State Recreation and Conservation
Area Management Plan. Volume IV, Report on biological issues. University of Florida, Gainesville.
Hoctor, Thomas S. 1992. Conservation buffer zones: protecting preserves, biological diversity, and
ecological integrity. M.F.R.C. Technical paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, 59 pages,
Book Reviews
Hoctor, Thomas S., and L. D. Harris. 1998. Panthers in the landscape. Conservation Biology 12(6):1426-
1427.
Harris, L. D. and Thomas S. Hoctor. 1994. Greenway ecology, the prolegomenon. Conservation Biology
8(2):603-605.
CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS AND SEMINARS
Hoctor, T.S. 2009 (Invited). Status of conservation in Florida. Panel Discussion at the Florida Native Plant
Society Conference, May 2009, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Hoctor, T.S., J. Oetting, B. Stys, and M. Endries. 2009 (Invited). Ecosystem service and green
infrastructure assessment in the Florida Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project. U.S. Chapter
of the International Association of Landscape Ecology Symposium, April 2009, Snowbird, UT.
Hoctor, T.S" and J. Oetting. 2008. Existing and future identification of ecosystems services in the Critical
Lands and Waters Identification Project. Florida's Cooperative Conservation Blueprint Workshop at
the ACES Conference on Ecosystem Services: 2008: Using Science for Decision Making in Dynamic
Systems, December 2008, Naples, FL.
Hoctor, T.S., and J. Oetting. 2008. Development and Future of the Florida Critical Lands and Waters
Identification Project. Public Land Acquisition & Management Conference, December 2008,
Jacksonville, FL.
Hoctor, T.S. 2008. Green infrastructure planning in Florida. 2008. Maryland State Development Plan
Workshop, October 2008, Annapolis, MD,
Noss, R., T. Hoctor, M. Volk, S. Beyeler, J. Oetting, J. Weiss, and J. Overpeck. 2008. Characteristics of
terrestrial climate sensitive species and necessity of adaptive land corridors. Florida's Wildlife: On the
Frontline of Climate Change Summit, October 2008, Orlando, FL.
Noss, R., T. Hoctor, M, Volk, S. Beyeler, J. Oetting, 1. Weiss, and J. Overpeck. 2008. Between the devil
and the deep blue sea: determining priorities in highly dynamic land-sea interfaces. Society for
Conservation Biology 2008 Annual Meeting, July 2008, Chattanooga, TN.
Hoctor, T. S. 2008. Protecting Florida and northeast Florida green infrastructure. Northeast Florida
Connectivity Summit, April 2008, Jacksonville, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2008. Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project. Presentation to the Century
Commission for a Sustainable Florida, April 2008, Tallahassee, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Florida conservation planning in a transportation and land use planning context. 1000
Friends of Florida Transportation and Land Use Symposium, December 2007, Sarasota, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Protecting Florida's green infrastructure. Mark Benedict Memorial Symposium,
December 2007, Naples, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project. Presentation to the Century
Commission for a Sustainable Florida, December 2007, Orlando, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Identification of conservation priorities tor the Florida black bear through habitat and
connectivity modeling. Presentation to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Florida
Black Bear Management Plan Working Group, October 2007, Gainesville, FL.
10
-~~-~
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Connectivity and green infrastructure planning in Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission Stakeholders' Fish and Wildlife Forum, June 2007, Orlando, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Florida and Southeastern U.S. Conservation Planning. Presentation to the Wildlands
Project executive staff, May 2007, Orlando, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Regional landscape for conserving Babcock Ranch in Southwest Florida. Presentation
to the Babcock Ranch Steering Committee, April 2007, Punta Gorda, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Connectivity for wildlife in Florida. Florida Native Plant Society 27th Annual
Conference, April 2007, Gainesville, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2007. Connectivity analysis methods in regional conservation assessments. Invited
symposium speaker for symposium at the 22"' Annual Symposium of the U.S. Association of the
International Association for Landscape Ecology, April 2007, Tucson, AZ.
Hoctor, T.S. 2006. The Florida Ecological Greenways Network and protecting a statewide Florida black
bear metapopulation. Defenders of Wildlife Carnivore Conference, November 2006, St. Petersburg,
FL.
Hoctor, T.S. 2006. The Florida Ecological Greenways Network: protecting biodiversity, and
ecosystem services. Florida Native Plant Society seminar, November 2006, Gainesville, FL.
Hoctor, T.S. 2006. The Florida Ecological Greenways Network: protecting bears, biodiversity, and
ecosystem services. Natural Areas Association Conference, September 2006, Flagstaff, AZ.
Hoctor, T. S. 2006. Connectivity considerations. 1000 Friends of Florida Designing for Wildlife
Workshop, September 2006, Gainesville, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2006. The Florida Ecological Greenways Network: prioritization, implementation, and policy
developments. River Fest, February 2006, Pal atka, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2005. Protecting connectivity for the Florida black bear. Florida Black Bear Festival,
October 2005, Umatilla, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2005. What are we trying to protect and how in Florida? Sierra Club workshop, May 2005
Olustee, FL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2004. The Southeastern Ecological Framework and protecting critical ecosystems in EPA
Regions. U.S. EPA Office of Environmental Information Conference, December 2004, Miami, FL.
Hoctor, T.S. 2004. Identifying and protecting ecological networks and critical ecosystems. Invited
symposium speaker, Natural Areas Association Conference, October 2004, Chicago, IL.
Hoctor, T. S. 2004. Regional conservation planning applications for identifying and protecting ecological
networks. 1000 Friends of Florida planning workshop, July 2004, Panama City, FL.
Hoctor, T. S., M. Carr, and P. Zwick. 2004. Delineation, prioritization, and protection ofthe Florida
Ecological Greenways Network. The 19th Annual Symposium of the U.S. Association of the
International Association for Landscape Ecology. March 2004, Las Vegas, NV.
Hoctor, T.S. 2004. Planning information for protecting Florida's biodiversity. Defenders of Wildlife
transportation planning workshop, March 2004, Orlando, FL.
Hoctor, T. S., M. Carr, P. Zwick, C. Goodison, K. Whitney, C. Berish, J. Richardson, R. Durbrow, and D.
Maehr. 2003. Delineation of an ecological network to facilitate conservation planning in the
southeastern U.S.A. 6th International Association for Landscape Ecology World Congress, Darwin,
Australia, July 2003.
Hoctor, T. S. 2003. Defining and protecting Florida's green infrastructure. Ninth Annual Public Interest
Environmental Conference, Gainesville, FL, February 2003.
Hoctor, T. S., Margaret H. Carr, Paul D. Zwick, Crystal Goodison, and Dave S. Maehr. 2002. The
relevance of ecological networks to the conservation and restoration of wide-ranging species and
biodiversity as a whole in Florida and the Southeastern United States. The Wildlife Society
Conference, Bismarck, ND, September 2002.
Hoctor, T. S., C. Goodison, M. Carr, P. Zwick, J. Green, L. McCain, P. Hernandez, R. Durbrow, J.
Richardson, C. Berish, K. Whitney, and W. Robinson Rieth. 2002. Application ofa GIS model to
identify an ecological network for conservation planning in the southeastern United States. Society for
Conservation GIS Conference, Borrego Springs, CA, July 2002.
Hoctor, T. S. 2002. The case for connecting critical ecosystems. EPA RegionlORD Critical Ecosystems
Workshop, Keystone, CO, June 2002.
Hoctor, T S., and C. Goodison. 2002. Targeting priorities through characterization of the Southeastern
Ecological Framework. EPA Region/ORD Critical Ecosystems Workshop, Keystone, CO, June 2002.
I 1
_,~ ..m ,_ n . _"'_'"~_'"'.''''_''''''''__'_"~'~''_____''''_''~".''' ,. '..___._,... "_'_"-~~__""'~_'. _'~".. "_"_'^'~'Vh'.~"""""'_",
-,
,.___.'_..n
Hoctor, T. S. 2002. The ecological character and conservation priorities of north-central Florida. Eighth
Annual Public Interest Environmental Conference, Gainesville, FL, March 2002.
Hoctor, T. S. 2001. Identification of areas of regional ecological significance in the Southeastern
Ecological Framework. Sustainable Forestry and Sustainable Communities Workshop, Consultative
Group on Biological Diversity and the Turner Foundation, Charlotte, NC, December 200 I.
Hoctor, T.S. 200 I. Using GIS in regional conservation planning in Florida and St. Johns County Florida.
Presentation to the St. Johns County Sierra Club, November 2001.
Hoctor, T. S., C. Goodison, M. Carr, P. Zwick, K. Whitney, and W. Robinson Rieth. 200 I. Application of a
GIS model to identifY an ecological network for conservation planning in the southeastern United
States. Natural Areas Association Conference, Cocoa Beach, FL, September 2001.
Hoctor, T.S. 2001. Using GIS in regional conservation planning in Florida. Presentation to the Duval
County Sierra Club, June, 200 I.
Hoctor, T.S. 200 I. Using GIS in regional conservation planning in Florida. Presentation to the Alachua
County Planning Work Group, February 200 I,
Hoctor, T. S. 200 I. Florida's Ecological Network Project. Environmental Law Institute's National
Biodiversity Symposium, Status of the States: Innovative State Strategies for Biodiversity
Conservation, Washington, D.C.
Meegan, R. P., D. S. Maehr, and T, S. Hoctor. 2000. Corridors, Landscape Linkages, and Conservation
Planning tor the Florida Panther (Puma cone%r cory;). Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration
Science Conference, Naples, FL.
Hoctor, T., M. Carr, and P. Zwick. 2000. IdentifYing an ecological reserve network in the southeastern
United States. The Third Conference of the Society of Conservation GIS, Borrego Springs, CA.
Hoctor, T., M. Carr, and P. Zwick. 2000. IdentifYing ecological reserve networks in Florida and the
Southeastern United States. Society tor Conservation Biology Annual Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Hoctor, T., M. Carr, and P. Zwick. 2000. Ecological reserve networks in Florida and the Southeastern
United States: road issues and opportunities. The 15th Annual Symposium of the U.S. Association of
the International Association for Landscape Ecology. Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Invited special session
speaker.
Hoctor, T. 2000. Designing reserve networks and principles for prioritizing land protection efforts.
Presentation to the St. Johns County Land Acquisition and Management Board. St. Augustine, FL,
February 23, 2000.
Hoctor, T. 2000. IdentifYing and designing ecological reserve networks. The Nature Conservancy
International Science and Stewardship Conference. Beyond Our Borders: Conservation at Multiple
Scales. Orlando, Florida. Invited speaker.
Hoctor, T. 2000. Designing reserve networks and principles for prioritizing land protection efforts.
Presentation to the Alachua County Sierra Club. Gainesville, FL, February 6, 1999.
Hoctor, T. 1999. Designing reserve networks and principles for prioritizing land protection efforts.
Presentation to the Alachua County Land Conservation Advisory Committee. Gainesville, FL,
December 6. 1999.
Hoctor, T. 1999. Establishing effective biodiversity conservation: ecological networks and strategic land
management. Public Land Acquisition and Management Annual Partnership Conference. Panama
City, FL. Invited speaker,
Hoctor, T. 1999. Protecting Florida's natural heritage with regional landscape planning and integrated
community design. University of Florida Department of Landscape Architecture 2"d Biennial
Landscape Architecture Symposium. Designing Livable Communities: Techniques for Florida's
Future. Invited speaker.
Hoctor, T., M, Carr, and P. Zwick. 1999, Identification of ecological networks in Florida and the southeast
United States using regional conservation planning and Geographic Information Systems. 26th Annual
Natural Areas Conference. Conservation Planning: From Sites to Systems. Tucson, AZ.
Hoctor, T" M. Carr, and P. Zwick. 1999. IdentifYing and designing a Florida ecological network, The 2nd
Symposium for the Conservation of Florida's Turtles and Tortoises. St. Petersburg, FL. Invited
speaker.
Hoctor, T., M. Carr, and P. Zwick, 1999, Identification and realization ofa Florida ecological network: the
Florida Greenways Project and GIS decision support modeling within a political context. International
12
Association of Landscape Ecology 5'b World Congress, Snowmass, Colorado. Invited special
symposium speaker.
Hoctor, T., M. Carr, P. Zwick, J. Green, K. Whitney, and P. Hernandez. 1999. Application ofaGIS model
to identifY areas of ecological significance and an ecological network in the southeastern United States.
The Second Conference of the Society of Conservation GIS, Idyllwild, CA.
Hoctor, Thomas S., Margaret H. Carr, and Paul D. Zwick. 1999. A GIS-based landscape approach for the
identification of a statewide integrated conservation system in Florida. The Florida Chapter of the
Wildlife Society Conference, Orlando, FL.
Hoctor, Thomas S. 1998. A GIS-based approach for the identification of a statewide ecological
conservation system in Florida. Department of Forestry Seminar, University of Kentucky, Lexington,
KY.
Deuver, L., and Thomas S. Hoctor. 1998. Using mapping charetles to identifY ecological reserve networks.
The First Conference of the Wildlands Project, Estes Park, CO.
Hoctor, Thomas S., Margaret H. Carr, Mark A. Benedict, and Paul D. Zwick. 1998. A GIS-based landscape
approach for the identification of a statewide integrated conservation system in Florida. The First
Conference of the Society of Conservation GIS, Idyllwild, CA.
Hoctor, Thomas S., Margaret H. Carr, Mark A. Benedict, and Paul D. Zwick. 1998. A GIS-based
landscape approach for the identification of a statewide integrated conservation system in Florida.
Linkages in Ecosystem Science, Management, and Restoration, Natural Resources Forum '98,
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Hoctor, Thomas S., Margaret H. Carr, Mark A. Benedict, and Paul D. Zwick. 1998. A GIS-based
landscape approach for the identification of a statewide integrated conservation system in Florida.
United States Regional Association of the International Association for Landscape Ecology, 13'"
Symposium, Lansing, Michigan.
Carr, Margaret. H., Thomas S. Hoctor, and Paul D. Zwick. 1998. Connections at the Crossroads: The
Florida Greenways Experiment. Connections: The 4'" Annual Public Interest Environmental
Conference, Gainesville, FL.
Carr, Margaret H., Paul D. Zwick, and Thomas S. Hoctor. 1998. Using GIS for identifYing greenways and
interfaces with transportation systems. International Conference on Wildlife Ecology and
Transportation. Ft. Myers, FL.
Hoctor, Thomas S. 1997. Application of reserve design principles for balancing agricultural and ecological
management on public lands and in regional conservation systems. Florida Land Acquisition and
Management Conference: Promoting Partnerships in Preservation and Conservation, Sarasota, FL.
Hoctor, Thomas S., Margaret H. Carr, Mark A. Benedict, and Paul D. Zwick. 1997. A GIS-based
landscape approach for the identification of a statewide integrated conservation system in Florida.
Third International Conference on the Science and Management of Protected Areas, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada.
Benedict, Mark, A., Thomas S. Hoctor, Margaret H. Carr, and Paul D. Zwick. 1997. A GIS-based
landscape approach to the conservation of Florida's native ecosystems. United States Regional
Association of the International Association for Landscape Ecology, 12'b Symposium, Durham, North
Carolina.
Hoctor, Thomas S. 1996. The ecological effects of roads. Road Activist's Workshop, Ocala National
Forest, March, 1996.
13
_'.M_""_._._.____,~_^~
-,-"-_.._~--~_. .
. ~_.- ......." . -.--.--. -........-.
-"'-"'-"'--'_'_-~'~~
. .,....,"_..'.__.~M._"~.__.
Robert J. Kawula, Ph.D.
2960 Glen Ives Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32312
(Home) 850-385-3226
(Work) 850-488-8905
E-mail: rkawula(i/:;cmbarqmail.col11
EDUCATION:
Ph.D. Southern Illinois University/Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory
Carbondale, Illinois 6290 I
Major: Zoology
Specialization: Wildlife Habitat Analysis and Evaluation / Waterfowl Ecology
Secondary Area: Biostatistics
February 1993 - December 1998
M.S Frostburg State University/UMCES - Appalachian Laboratory
Frostburg, Maryland 21532
Major: Wildlife Management
May 1989 - December 1992
B.S. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481
Majors: Biology and Wildlife Management
Minor: Forestry
September 1983 - May 1988
Ashwaubenon High School
Green Bay, Wisconsin 54304
September 1979 - June 1983
WORK
EXPERIENCES:
Biological Scientist IV
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation COl1Ul1ission, Florida Wildlife Research Institute,
2574 Seagate Drive, SUIte 250, Tallahassee, FL 3230 I
Supervisor: Ms. Beth Stys
Phone: (850) 488-0588
September 1997 Present
Develop statewide species models on Threatened, Endangered, or Special Concern species based
on the life history, population ecology, habitat requirements, and dispersal patterns. Create
spatially accurate distribution maps for listed fish and wildlife species and critical habitats. Obtain
and integrate wildlife species and habitat information into a geographical infonnation system
(GIS). Perform GIS/statistical analyses to identifY terrestrial, wetland and aquatic habitats
important to listed species. Contributing member of numerous wildlife research projects that
currently include Florida panther habitat use and movements using GPS and VHF radio telemetry
and analysis of large manunal road crossings. Write progress reports, technical reports, and peer
reviewed manuscripts for publication of project results, conclusions, and management
implications. Provide technical assistance to other projects and programs within the agency.
Evaluate, support, and coordinate data acquisition for field biologists as requested. Member of
"_".'_'_"~___~'__'__"_'W'_ __~.w.._,..,,___",..
,",.-.,.,.,,~~--,'~."-' ..,
-..;----
-"'-"-"~"
... -
'.....'
..,__~..v__.____.
Robert J. Kawula, Ph.D.
Page 2
COlID11ission's avian research planning team that identities, plans. and coordinates avian research
throughout the state. Hire, supen'ise, and train records teclmicians who arc responsible for
responding to tec1mical assistance requests (prior to 2005 agency reorganization). Respond to
requests from govemment agencies. stakeholders, and the public for listed species and critical
habitat information on proposed development projects and provide comments regarding potential
effects of project construction on fish and wildlife habitat. Assist Commission biologists and other
federal and state agencies in the development and implementation of GIS technology, database
management and statistical analysis to manage and analyze natural resource data. Represent the
agency and office at intra- and interagency meetings concellling species habitat analysis,
infonllation technology, and the development of policy and standards for the use and dissemination
of spatial data. Serve as the system administrator for the departmental computer network
consisting of Windows and Unix based workstations and servers. Responsible for purchasing IT
related equipment and software. maintenance of peripheral devices, mtegration of computer
platforms, and network and computer hardware and software installation. Provide reports for the
use and implementation of technology and future needs of the department.
Researcher II
Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois Umversity, Carbondale, IL 62901
Supervisor: Dr. Alan Woolf (deceased)
Phone: (618) 536-7766
January - August 1997
Contributing member of research team investigating bobcat movements and habitat use. Specific
duties included habitat assessment and mapping using radio-telemetry locations and digital image
processing of SPOT and Landsat TM satellite imagery to identify and map critical bobcat habitat
in southern Illinois. Provide technical support to field biologists. Other duties include computer
hardware and software maintenance. Advise and assist colleagues in biostatistics and GIS.
Faculty Research Assistant
University of Maryland Center for Enviromnental Science - Appalachian Laboratory. Frostburg,
MD 21532
Supervisor: Dr. Raymond P. Morgan II
Phone: (301) 689-7100
April 1992 - January 1993
Developed and integrated coldwater stream survey data into a GIS. Edited and classified stream
vector coverages. PlalU1ed, constructed, and implemented a user interface linking data base files
with stream reaches and sampling stations. Wrote computer programs to compile and summarize
database infonnation. Developed protocol for database maintenance and integration of newly
collected data. Collected water samples from coldwater streams for chemical analysis under strict
adherence to EP A guidelines. Sampled fish populations using electro-fishing. Assisted colleagues
in other aspects of the study.
Consultant
University of Maryland Center for Envirorunental Science.. Appalachian Laboratory, Frostburg,
MD 21532
Supervisors: Drs. J. Edward Gates and RaynlOnd P. Morgan II
Phone: (301) 689-7100
April - June 1992
Provided technical assistance to faculty members on private consulting project to dctetminc habitat
loss caused by an increase in pool level above a hydroelectric dam using GIS. Performed habitat
evaluation under strict compliance with HEP procedural guidelines. Prepared large-scale habitat
maps as required by the client.
Robert J. KawuIa, Ph.D.
Page 3
GRADUATE EXPERIENCE:
Research
Assistant:
Teaching
Assistant:
Research
Assistant:
Research
Assistant:
Laboratory
Instructor:
Cooperative Wildlife Research l.aboratory, Southern Illinois University,
Carbondale, lL 6290 I
Major advisor/Supervisor: Dr. Robert J. Gates
Current Address: School of Natural Resources, 210 Kottman Hall, The Ohio State
University, 2021 Coffey Road. Columbus, OH 43210-1095
Phone: (614) 292-2265
February 1993 - December 1996
Contributing member of a research team investigating populations and habitat
relationships of wood ducks in the Mississippi River floodplain in southern Illinois.
Developed project work plans and responsible for the maintaining project schedule.
Other responsibilities include coordination and supervision of undergraduate field
assistants and project management. Responsible for sUnll11arizmg data and synthesizing
information using habitat assessment, species movement, and statistical tedmiques.
Classified habitats using aerial photography and Landsat TM satellite imagery.
Additional duties include radio-telemetry, vegetation inventory, data analysis, and
preparation of quarterly and almual progress reports.
Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 6290 I
Supervisor: Dr. Richard Halbrook
Phone: (618) 536-7766
August-December 1993 and 1994
20 hrlweek @! $11 OO/month
Lecturer and laboratory assistant for undergraduate/graduate level course in Wildlife
Teclmiques. Assisted in development of course curriculum with emphasis in GIS/remote
sensing and habitat evaluation and assessment.
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. Appalachian
Laboratory, Frostburg, MD 21532
Supervisor: Dr. Raymond P. Morgan II
Phone: (301) 689-7 I 00
March 1991 - March 1992
Assisted in data acquisition and compilation for a cold water stream database. Entered
historical data and wrote software used in analysis and input into GIS.
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science - Appalachian
Laboratory, Frostburg, MD 2 I 532
Major Advisor/Supervisor: Dr. J. Edward Gates
Phone: (301) 689-7100
May 1989 - February 1991
Collected, entered, and organized data on the final phase of a project studying mammal
behavior and movement at oversized stream culverts along an interstate highway.
Implemented a variety of field sampling techniques to detern1ine the effects of highway
construction and habitat loss on wildlife. Supervised field assistants. Submitted quarterly
progress reports on preliminary analysis of data.
Department of Biology Frostburg Slale University, Frostburg, MD
Supervisor: Dr. William Pegg (retired)
Phone: (301) 687-4343
January- May 1991
21532
Robert J. Kawula, Ph.D.
Page 4
InstlUcted and supervised undergraduate students perfonnlllg weekly laboratory
exercises for an introductory biology course. V.hote, graded, and prepared laboratory'
materials for quizzes and practical exams.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Computer
Operator:
Wildlife
Intern:
Teaching
Assistant:
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point \VI 544H 1
Supervisor: Jane Giese (transferred)
Phone: unknown
September 1983 - May 1988
Work/study student responsible for the processing of daily production information,
maintaining a highly organized management infomlation system, and supervising other
work/study students. Proficient handling of administrative documents and procedures
supported operation efficiency.
Wildlife Intem: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Upper Souris National Wildlife
Refuge, Foxholm, ND 58738
Supervisor: George Maze, Assistant Refuge Manager (transferred from USNWR)
Phone: (701) 468-5467
May - August 1987
Developed and researched a comprehensive study of nesting songbirds and their
relationship to a variety of habitat management practices. Initial analysis, documentation,
and reconunendations set standards for burning, cutting and grazing objectives and
procedures. Contributions established guidelines for follow-up research. Additional
duties include waterfowl nest searching, habitat evaluation for grazing and fire risk, and
Canada goose capture and banding. Assisted refuge personnel in various maintenance
activities. Supervised refuge volunteers.
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI 54481
Supervisor: Dr. Neil Payne (retired)
Phone: unknown
May - July 1985
Full application of educational background provided knowledgeable assistance in the
field study of Wildlife Management Techniques. Prepared program materials, led field
study groups, lectured and tutored individuals; supporting program/student development
Ph.D. Dissertation:
GRADUATE RESEARCH:
M.S. Thesis:
Independent Study:
ADDITIONAL SKILLS:
"Resource selection and movements of breeding female wood ducks in southern Illinois."
"Effects of interstate highway construction and vehicular use on white-tailed deer and
medium-sized mammals."
"Determination of habitat loss along and interstate highway using GIS."
Extensive experience using all popular office application suites including word processing, spreadsheet,
database, and presentation graphic applications. Proficient with many analytical software packages on
Windows and Unix/Linux operating systems. Applied programming experience in SAS, Visual Basic,
Robert J. KawuIa, Ph.D.
Page 5
Python, Fortran, and C programming languages. Working knowledge of web site maintenance and
development using both commercial and open source applications. Extensive experience using GIS
including ArcGlS, Arc/Info \vorkstation. ArcVic\\' 3.x, Erdas Imagine, and Map and Image Processing
System (MIPS) on both Unix and WindO\vs platfoIll1s.
Professional Development Courses Completed:
Team BUIlding (DISC), Tallahassee, fL, June 200R.
Mixed Models Workshop, St. Petersburg, FL, May 2007.
Fundamentals of Project Management/Time Management, Tallahassee, FL, March 2007.
Analysis and Management of Vertebrate Populations, Gainesville, FL, March 2007.
Meetings Management Workshop, Tallahassee, fL, January 2007.
Modelling Pattern and Dynamics of Species Occurrence Workshop, Laurel, MD. August 2006.
Advanced Analysis with ArcGIS, Tallahassee, FL, November 2004
Mastering Microsoft Visual Basic 6 Fundamentals training course, Tallahassee, FL, January 2002.
Microsoft Access training course, Tallahassee, FL, September 1999.
Erdas/ESRI ArcView Image Analysis training course, Tallahassee, FL, April 1999.
ESRI ArcView Spatial Analyst training course, Tallahassee, FL, November 1997.
MIPS training course, Baltimore, MD, May 1992.
Basic Firefighter (S-130) & Introduction to Fire Behavior (S-190) training course, Minot, ND, June In7.
HONORS AND A WARDS:
Award of Recognition for a Team Player, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Conmlission, Office of
Environmental Services, June 2001.
Dissertation Research Award. Graduate School, Southern Illinois University, July - December 1996.
Geography Department Scholarship. Frostburg State University
Completed short-course entitled "NONTIDAL WETLANDS: Ecology, Regulations and Delineation
Procedures", May 1991.
Geography Department Scholarship, Frostburg State University
Completed short-course entitled "WETLANDS DELINEATION: Certification Training Course". August
1991.
Scholastic Achievement Awards, University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point, College of Natural Resources,
fall 1983 and springs 1986 and 1987.
Scholastic Achievement Honors, University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point, spring 1985
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
AND COMMITTEES:
The Wildlife Society, 1993 - 1997,2000 - present.
National Research Council Transportation Research Board, Member, Committee for Environmental
Geospatiallnformation for Transportation: A Peer Exchange on Partnerships. Appointment from April
2003 - March 2004
Seven Hills Regional Users Group, North Florida and southern Georgia GIS Users Group, 2000 - present.
Committee Member, Florida State Employees Charitable Campaign, July - October 2002
Robert J. Kawula, Ph.D.
Page 6
Infon11ation Technology Steering Committee, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, ~OOO-
2002.
Infon113tion Teclmology Council, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Conllilission, 1999 - 2000.
GeographIc Systems Users Group, Southem Illinois University, July 1994 - 1997.
Maryland MIPS Users Group, July 1992 - December 1993.
Local Conullittee, 70lh Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mammalogists, Frostburg State
University. Maryland, November 19~8 - June 1990.
PUBLICATIONS AND MAJOR REPORTS:
Swanson, K.,D. Land. R. Kautz, and R.Kawula. 2008. Use of least-cost pathways to identify key road
segments for Florida panther conservation. Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Technical Report
TR-I3. ii, 44 p.
Land E. D., D. B. Shindle, R. J. Kawula,.I. F. Benson, M. A. Lotz, and D. P. Onorato. 2008. FlOrida
panther habitat selection analysis of concurrent GPS and VHF telemetry data. JournalofWildlifc
Management 72:633-639
Kautz, R., B. Stys, and R. Kawula. 2007. Florida vegetation 2003 and land use change between 1985-89
and 2003. Florida Scientist 70: I 2-23
Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Janson, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti,
R.McBride, l. Richardson, and K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Habitat zones for
conservation of the Florida panther. Biological Conservation 130: 118-133.
Gilbert T., R. Kautz, T. Eason, R. Kawula and C. Morea. 200 I. Prioritization of statewide black bear
roadkill problem areas in Florida. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecology and
Transportation. Keystone, Colorado, USA.
Ryan, D. c., R. J. Kawula, and R. J. Gates. 1998. Breeding biology of wood ducks using natural cavities in
southern Illinois. .Ioumal of Wildlife Management 62:112-123.
Kawula, R. J., J. E. Gates, and W. R. Gates. 1996. Response of deer and medium-sized mammals to
interstate highway construction and operation. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society
112:3-39.
Gates, R. .I., D. C. Ryan, and R. .I. Kawula. 1995. Wood duck population and habitat investigations study
no. 1: Population monitoring and habitat relationships of wood ducks in southern Illinois. Final
Report, Project W-121_R. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Springfield, illinOIS, USA
Pinder, M. 1., R..I. Kawula, and R. P. Morgan 11. 1993. Development ofa coldwater database for Allegany
and Garrett Counties: Phase IV. Final Report, Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
Annapolis, Maryland, USA.
PAPERS PRESENTED AT PROFESSIONAI~ MEETINGS:
Kawula, R. J., and M. Endries. A multivariate black bear habitat model for predicting habitat connections
in the Florida panhandle. Public Land Acquisition and Management Partnership Conference.
Howey-in-the Hills, FL, November 2002.
Robert J. Kawula, Ph.]).
Page 7
Selle. A. T., R. 1. Kawula, and R. J. Gates. Annual variation in productivity ofnalural cavity nesting VI'ood
ducks in southern Illinois. Firsl North American Duck Symposia and \Vorkshop. Baton Rouge,
LA, February 1997 (poster)
Ka\vula, R. J., and R. J. Gates. Movements and habitat use ofnatura\ cavity nesting wood ducks in southern
Illinois. \Vildlife Society yd Annual Conference, Cincinnati, OH, October 1996.
Gates, R. J., and R. 1. Kavvu\a. Population momtoring and habitat relationships of wood ducks in southern
ll1inois. Annual Meeting of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Division of \Vildlife
Resources, Grafton, IL, September 1995
KawuIa, R. J., D. C. Ryan, P. J. Bergmann, and R..I. Gates. Biology of hen wood ducks nesting in natural
cavities in southern Illinois. 561h Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference Indianapolis, IN,
December 1994.
Kawula, R. J. Effects of interstate highway construction on medium-sized mammals. University of
Maryland, Center for Ecological and Estuarine Studies Colloquium. Solomons, MD, September
1993.