CCPC Backup 03/04/2010 IAMPCCPC
SPECIAL
MEETING
CP- 2008 -5
IMMOKALEE AREA
MASTER PLAN
BACKUP DOCUMENTS
MARCH 4, 2010
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2010,
IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA:
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM.
INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR
GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON
AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE
WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS
MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE
RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED
TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE
PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC
WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE
AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
IF APPLICABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED
A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE
MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS
MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY
3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 28, 2010 (CIE /LDC MEETING) and FEBRUARY 4, 2010
6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS —FEBRUARY 23, 2010
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CP- 2008 -5, Petition requesting an amendment to the Immokalee Area Master Plan and Immokalee
Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map, to make revisions to the entire Master Plan to include:
increases to commercial acreage, industrial acreage, and allowable residential density; elimination of some
existing designations; creation of a new designation for the Immokalee Regional Airport site; and, addition
of approximately 103 acres presently designated Agricultural/Rural within the Rural Lands Stewardship
Area as identified on the countywide Future Land Use Map. [Coordinator: Carolina Valera] Continued
from the 2/16/2010 and the 2/18/2010 CCPC meetings.
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM
13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
14. ADJOURN
2/19/10 CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows /jmp
1 LDC Amendment Request
2
3 Revised 03/03/2010 After Consultation with Staff (Susan Istenes). Changes are
4 struck through or underlined and highlighted in Yellow.
5
6
7
8 ORIGIN: Immokalee CRA (through contract with RWA, Inc.)
9
10 AUTHOR: Robert J. Mulhere; AICP, RWA, Inc.
11
12 DEPARTMENT: Immokalee CRA
13
14 AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2009 -1 Cycle
15
16 LDC PAGE: LDC 2:40.3
17
18 LDC SECTION(S): Section 2.03.07 G Immokalee Overlay
19
20 CHANGE: The proposed Amendment creates an interim process allowing for
21 deviations from various existing LDC provisions for properties located within the
22 Immokalee Urban Area. The purpose of Section 2.03.07 G, Immokalee Overlay is "To
23 create the Immokalee Overlay District with distinct subdistricts for the purpose of
24 establishing development criteria, suitable for the unique land use needs of the
25 Immokalee Community. "
26
27 Presently, substantial amendments to the IAMP are being developed with specific Goals,
28 Objectives and Polices to fulfill this purpose. Once such amendments have been adopted
29 by the Board of County Commissioners, comprehensive Immokalee- centered and TAMP-
30 based LDC amendments will be developed for inclusion in this Section of the LDC. It is
31 anticipated that this process will take approximately 24 months from Oeteber of 2009
32 adoption of the IAMP to complete. Therefore, it has been determined that it is
33 appropriate to establish an interim process to allow for deviations from various LDC
34 provisions for properties being improved within the Immokalee Overlay District. This
35 Section is interim in nature in that it will be in effect for 24 months from the date of
36 adoption of this amendment and will be eliminated once the comprehensive Immokalee
37 Overlay LDC amendments have been adopted. A further extension of this interim
38 deviation process may be granted by the BCC if such extension is warranted. This
39 Section addresses the specific permissible deviations, limitations thereon, and the review
40 and approval process. This interim amendment will establish a process that will allow for
41 deviations from the various LDC provisions within the existing Immokalee Urban
42 Designated Area. The deviations will be administratively reviewed and approved if they
43 fall under certain thresholds, or otherwise will require a public hearing before the CCPC.
44 The deviations are limited to specific LDC provisions, and specific evaluative criteria
45 have been established. Ultimately, in conjunction with the forthcoming ]AMP
1
Text underlined is new text to be added.
t,.A .,, be ae PA89
46 Amendments, it is anticipated that the deviation process will either be refined or specific
47 land development regulations (LDRs) for Immokalee will be adopted to reduce or
48 eliminate the need for the deviation process.
49
50 REASON: The Immokalee CRA Advisory Board and the IMPVC advocates the creation
51 of Immokalee- specific LDRs, which will be different from those applicable in Coastal
52 Collier County. They will be consistent with and further the Goals, Objectives and
53 Policies of the IAMP and the CRA Redevelopment Plan. The primary Goal is expressed
54 in the current draft IAMP as follows:
55
56 Encourage future growth in Immokalee that will promote economic diversity and
57 prosperity, while providing adequate infrastructure and services, protecting important
58 natural resources, and promoting the creation of safe, affordable housing. The design
59 of new development and the compatibility of land uses will be important considerations
60 in protecting and enhancing quality of 1i(e in the community.
61
62 Given that this Goal recognizes the importance of design as it relates to new development
63 and compatibility of land uses as essential considerations in protecting and enhancing the
64 quality of life in Immokalee, this interim deviation process has been developed to be
65 limited in its applicability and to require full consideration of the compatibility issue
66 associated with any deviation request.
67
68 FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS:
69
70 This LDC amendment will have a fiscal impact on the County in that Community
71 Development and Environmental Services (CDES) staff time and resources are required
72 to review and process deviation requests. Given the narrow focus of the proposed interim
73 deviation process, impacts to other County departments or independent districts should be
74 minimal. Since CDES is, in large part, funded through user fees, it is anticipated that an
75 appropriate fee will be established for the deviation process.
76
77 It is anticipated that deviations will be requested on average 10 to 15 times per year.
78 Deviation requests should be simple and straightforward in nature. Given that the
79 deviation request(s) will be submitted in conjunction with an SIP, SDP, SDP
80 Amendment, Insubstantial Change to an SDP or SIP, or Final Subdivision Plat, it is
81 anticipated that:
82
83 * No additional processing time (including file set up, assignment, distribution,
84 correspondence, and advertising) should be necessary.
85 * Another maximum of 10 hours for actual staff review at an average hourly rate of
86 $36.00 plus a 40% factor for overhead (and other non -salary expenses) equals an
87 hourly cost estimate of $50.40 for a total estimate of $504.00; and
88
89 Certainly CDES staff can conduct a more exact time analysis and make a final
90 recommendation for an appropriate fee; however, based upon this preliminary estimate,
91 the time commitment and cost to handle such a petition would total 10 hours and a cost of
Page 2 of 10
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Tv1
about $500 (per application). Conservatively, assuming that 15 such petitions are
submitted per year, the time impact on staff would be minimal (0.07 FTE).
RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: This LDC amendment is consistent
with the Collier County GMP (including the IAMP).
OTHER NOTESNERSION DATE:
Amend the LDC as follows:
2.03.07
G. Immokalee Urban Overlay District. To create the Immokalee Urban Overlay District
with distinct subdistricts for the purpose of establishing development criteria suitable
for the unique land use needs of the Immokalee Community. The boundaries of the
Immokalee Urban Overlay District are delineated on the Maps 4- below.
[Replace Existing Immokalee Overlay Map with the following two maps:]
Page 3 of 10
115
116
Text underlined is new text to be added.
IMMOKALEE URBAN AREA OVERLAY
WEST HALF
2
U
Q
rc
F
A -MHO
I
VR __�
wMmLox 51
PUO
;
a
I
! 1 d
g�r�1N RSF3
�e
--
CF
I �A
��-.:
H
RSE- G3
! L KE iPU'F
C
A -MHO
R6F k
HI
PQ
LAKE
TRAFFO D
A -MHO
PUp�
I
RMIF -6
VR
A -MH
R
OR
J
i
�
E
eu
R:::--
lk
w
Z
J
U
Q
Page 4 of 10
Text underlined is new text to be added.
w IMMOKALEE URBAN AREA OVERLAY
EAST HALF
x
U
Q
� I
7
PUD IMMOKALEE REGIONAL
AIRPORT
R RG .FM:- (^
P A -MHO
O
SF -3
P
' R GS
_ OS
R
R F4(1
st A -MHO
7R7— OH 9a:�
vR �y
Erl
U
x� I
,A -MHO
w
z
F�
Q
117
118
119 1. Interim Deviations' This section addresses the specific permissible deviations.
120 limitations thereon and the review and approval process. This interim deviation
121 process is not intended to replace the current established process of requesting
122 deviations from various LDC site design and development standards through the
123 PUD or PUD amendment rezoning process but rather it applies to individual
Page 5 of 10
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text
124 properties in the Immokalee Urban Overlay District seeking a deviation or
125 deviations from the following LDC Sections and Subsections:
126
127 - 3.05.07.B.1 Preservation Standards Specific Standards Applicable
128 Outside the RFMU and RLSA districts Required Preservation Percentages
129 (Table Inset) consistent with Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal
130 Management Element.
131 - 4.02.01.A Dimensional Standards for Principal Uses in Base Zoning
132 Districts:
133 • Table 1 Lot Design Requirements for Principle Uses in Base
134 Zoning Districts;
135 • Table 2 Building Dimension Standards for Principle Uses in Base
136 Zoning Districts excluding building height and in the case of
137 commercial parcels located in the Nei aborhood Center Subdistrict
138 as depicted on the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) Future
139 Land Use Map (FLUM) no deviation shall be granted from the
140 required 50 -foot building setback when abutting residentially
141 zoned properties and the minimum 10 -foot wide landscaped strip
142 between the abutting roght -of -way and the off - street parking area;
143 and
144 Table 2.1 Table Of Minimum Yard Requirements (Setbacks) for
145 Base Zoning Districts.
146 - 4.02.01.B. 1 Usable open space (residential)
147 - 4 .02.013.2 Usable open space (commercial industrial, mixed -use)
148 - 4 02 02 Dimensional Standards for Conditional Uses and Accessory Uses
149 in Base Zoning Districts limited to the following subsections:
150 • B.l.a.447axd(ii);
151 • E (Table Inset) except building height;
152 --4-i
153 G L(f) limited to a maximum of three stories, (g), and (h);
154 a i�
155 J.4; and
156 K 1 (b) limited to minimum lot area.
157 - 4.02.03.A Specific Standards for Location of Accessory Buildings and
158 Structures Dimensional Standards (Tables 3 and 4)
159 - 4.02.03.B Accessory Building Lot Coverage
160 - 4.02.27.0 Specific Design Standards for the Immokalee- -State Road 29A
161 Commercial Overlay Subdistrict Building Design Standards
162 - 4 02 28 A Same -- Jefferson Avenue Commercial Overlay Subdistrict,
163 Building Design Standards
164 - 4.02.29.A Same - -Farm Market Overlay Subdistrict, Dimensional
165 Standards
166 - 4.02.32. Same - -Main Street Overlay Subdistrict limited to the following
167 subsections: A; C 1 • D.3 and D.4; and E.1, E.2, and E.3.
Page 6 of 10
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text striketWaugh q Ai ent tpxt tG tip, deleted
168
- 4.05.04.G Table 17: Parking Space Requirements utilizing the existing
169
administrative deviation process set forth in LDC Section 4.05.04.F.2.,
170
recognizing that the reduced need for off - street parking in Immokalee may
171
be offered as a viable basis for such administrative deviation.
172
- 4.05.06.13 Loading Space Requirements (Number Required)
173
- 4.06.02.0 Buffer Requirements (Limited to required width at�d recx�ired
174
W41s)
175
- 4.06.03.13 Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas and Rights -
176
of -Way, Standards for Landscaping in Vehicular Use Areas
177
- 4.06.05.13 General Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements
178
for industrial and commercial development limited to subsection B.3
179
- 4.06.05.0 General Landscaping Requirements Building Foundation
180
Planting Requirements (including Table Inset)
m n a n r
181
5 Oa F Vl
D n b11 (T hl C..:t. , - 0
182
5 05 05 PF PFF3FPvtfltifk s
c c c n n «t..
Set—ice
183
Offlabile r'
184
- 5.05.08.0 Architectural and Site Design Standards Building Design
185
Standards
186
- 5.05.08.1) Design Standards for Specific Uses
187
- 5.05.08.E Architectural and Site Design Standards Site Design Standards
188
limited to subsections 1 b� 2; 3; 4; 5 and 7.
189
c nA (p p a g' gp,, ,:. qed t > a w.
190
- 5 06.04 Sign Standards for Specific Situations limited to subsection C
191
192
a. Duration: This Section is interim in nature in that it will be in effect for 24
193
months from the effective date of the Ordinance date of adprijetj of this
194
amendment and will be eliminated once the comprehensive Immokalee
195
Overlay LDC amendments have been adopted A further extension of this
196
interim deviation process may be granted by the BCC is such extension is
197
warranted.
198
199
b. Insubstantial Deviations: Requested deviations shall be considered
200
insubstantial and shall be approved by staff in conjunction with the associated
201
application for Final Local Development Order �
202
subject to the following:
203
204
i. The requested deviations do not exceed a difference of neater than
205
-210% from the required dimension amount size or other applicable
206
standard with the exception of required number of parking spaces
207
which may exceed a difference up to effe a.:_a 20 percent of the LDC
208
requirement not to exceed a deviation of more than 10 spaces.
209
ii. Deviations from the limitations on exterior building colors a
210
° e.bit° ^t "r°' `'°"'gffi style as set forth in Subsection 5.05.08,
211
Architectural and Site Design Standards may be granted.
Page 7 of 10
Text underlined is new text to be added.
212 iii. Concurrent Deviation Application Insubstantial Deviations shall be
213 requested concurrent with the an application for an SDP, SDP
214
Amendment SIP SIP Amendment Final Subdivision Plat._
215
l r gggj n OrdF, -_ pr-eqe�. tThe applicant shall list all
216
approved deviations on the required site
217
plan(s) of gppjj ''° ° °" and shall also, where aigmen=
218
if requested by staff, depict the deviation(s) graphically on streh the
219
plan(s) or- ' Additional araphie information including scaled
220
detailed drawings or aerial photos may also be required by staff, on a
221
case -by case basis The need for this additional infonnation shall be
222
determined at the pre - application meeting.
223
iv. c° ..t° n, 844 Appliga4ion. - -
°A
224
-- _,l _ Z, Z,,µ`1 Dl.,«^
t ., SQP SIP
225
Final )-N-gj IBPVelei3FAeR tt,° f 11 .....:.... ...t 1,°
226
sub a r rrreview a approya, l•
227
228
n arm /gf aey:ctim
229
, lrwry .L
U). &flj.,°,1,..jgflgtiR4g ftl, °g,.t,:,,Pf
231
(3) All existimtifn!MT EflWflt�, god
232
(n) Tt Fxap,4 natofe afld dim r requested
233
dev+at;ons
234
(b) n rfatiye deser tion of the a y (s) . eatie,,t,, .,,1
x»
2 3 5
hew the reguested ) l A tl
236
el:tter-ia se4 € r -a ,
237
MAR! l .,; °t: °steel s-em a:.,,,.. sie. —„ «, - ---- --
238
€or ejjjsfjfl sIp!gj�ffiEn-reqjjifeasi
239
bettrrdafy ar speepi.1 jma'93ese s} fn�e
240
l' a l Stait of Clefida to aseei4ain or
241
a ditiefks.
242
The fflost reeent available n t tir« °. ..a
243
(e) The R riate fee as establ:shM by tht D,...,..7 °r !`...... «..
244
Gas
245
246 c. Substantial Deviations' Requested deviations exceeding the limitations set
247 forth above in paragraphs b i and b. ii shall' a a ta be substantial'"
248 and l be considered and approved approved with conditions or
249 denied by the CCPC subject to the following s4mittal regiiireffients,
250 considerations and public notice provisions:
251
252 i. Cetleuffent Deviatien n ..1: ,.t' In «he Of ..ti,4aPAi..l
253
254 cnn n.., °.,,1.,, °.,t cro cro Amei9dment Final
255 Subdtr�isiefi�IZ1a�9 Eii�3P - - - __i_i_ r___1 x _eal
256 the lieai3t Sbgll proN,ide all of the infefmatieii re aired in b ::'
Page 8 of 10
Text underlined is new text to be added.
rN tpxt h he A,. p4Pd
257
abeve –mid shall also
258
f dpljntig addi:essing the ide ati f a
259
F > : below.
260
ji c ate De „«: kovNeation. in the ease r a stibstaiitial deviation
261
feeiiested eittside -6r «t.2- S.DRcnn cro
262
birlel— sr}bdiv Plat pif Bther F t r ,.,...t n....,.t,.,.r , ent n.-dei
263
the applieejit ,.he!! :so the saffie ..F „«: o a
264
t a Hddfp-sq all a «:1 list a
265
bekw-
266
iii. Considerations for Review and Approval: The CCPC shall consider
267
the following, as may be applicable in making a recommendation for
268
denial approval or approval with conditions:
269
270
(a) Whether or not the proposed deviation is compatible with
271
adjacent land uses and achieves the requirements and /or intent
272
of the regulations as closely practicable.
273
(b) Whether the proposed deviation is the minimum amount
274
necessary to allow for reasonable use of the property and /or
275
address the issue necessitating the deviation request.
276
(c) Whether the reduced or increased standard requested by the
277
deviation is mitigated for either on the subject site or by
278
providing a public benefit within one - quarter (1/4) mile of the
279
subject site and within the Immokalee Urban Area. Examples
280
of such on -site or off -site mitigation include but are not
281
limited to: increasing setbacks from the adjacent right -of -way
282
when proposing to deviate form sign size limitations;
283
increasing plantings or planting sizes or installing a fence or
284
wall where a reduced buffer width is proposed; accepting
285
stonnwater from a public right-of-way: providing public
286
pedestrian and /or bicycle pathway easements or other similar
287
mobility improvements including transit enhancements;
288
providing public parking, beautification in the public realm,
289
including street trees street furniture, lighting and other
290
similar public benefits.
291
(d) Whether- the deviq�iefi is f-4uFqfpJ in slliwaft-��
292
vrovidin t- a ..«:r.ed haasipj� „va. .
293
em3anded business in indxrtrieg targeted by ,he Feenepaie
294
n « ratified of Collier r,..,,,.., of 4he T,..,,.ekalee
295
C-m ^ ° a� n l O.
296
r "t
297
stfuetures in the r ' ' °
298
299
iv. Public Notice In the case of a substantial deviation, public notice for
300
the CCPC hearing will comply with the applicable portions of Section
301
10.03.053, specifically noting the location of the property and the
Page 9 of 10
Text underlined is new text to be added.
302
requested substantial deviation(s) The notice required in Section
303
10.03.05.13.8 shall include:
304
(a) a list of the requested substantial deviations;
305
(b) a brief narrative justification for such deviation(s); and
306
(c) a copy of the site plan or exhibit (in 11 by 17 inch or 8.5 by 11
307
inch format) listing and depicting the location of said
308
deviation(s).
309
310
d Appeals Within thirty days of the issuance of the decision of staff or of the
311
CCPC the owner or his authorized attorney or agent may appeal the decision
312
to the Board of County Commissioners A fee for the application and
313
processing of an owner- initiated appeal shall be established at a rate set by the
314
Board of County Commissioners from time to time and shall be charged to
315
and paid by the owner or his authorized agent. The Board of County
316
Commissioners shall approve the deviation request with or without
317
conditions or deny the deviation request.
Page 10 of 10
IMMOKALEE AREA
MASTER PLAN
PETITION CP- 2008 -5
THE DVD TITLED "CCPC ADDITIONAL REVIEW MATERIALS"
SUBMITTED FOR THIS ITEM IS ON FILE AND CAN BE FOUND IN
THE BOARD MINUTES & RECORDS DEPARTMENT
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING "F"
FOURTH FLOOR
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
MEMO
TO: Collier County Planning Commission
FROM: Nicole Ryan, Government Relations Manager
Kate Crosley, Conservation Associate
DATE: March 4 2010
RE: GIS Analysis for IAMP Natural Resources and Potential Mitigation Areas
In response to the Immokalee Area Master Plan (LAMP) Policy 2.1.3 Mitigation Banking
and /or Targeted Acquisition Lands, the Conservancy of Southwest Florida would like to
submit our data and analysis for consideration. The following document outlines the
specific GIS data layers we feel are important to include in this process as well as the GIS
analysis procedures we utilized to create a natural resources overlay for the Immokalee
Area (Immokalee Area Environmentally Significant Lands with Mitigation Potential).
This overlay depicts the most environmentally sensitive areas based on a combination of
the 13 data layers selected.
We have included our data and analysis on CDs, containing 3 folders labeled as PDF
Maps, Raw Natural Resource Layers, and Modified Natural Resource Layers. The Maps
folder contains the final visual products of our analysis. The Raw Natural Resource
Layers folder contains all the original, unaltered data layers we utilized which correspond
to the table in Section 1. of the GIS procedures attached to this cover letter. The Modified
Natural Resource Layers folder contains the altered (clipped, re- classed, etc.) files used
for analysis with subfolders that correspond to the sections in the GIS procedures.
The natural resources overlay for the Immokalee area highlights the most
environmentally significant lands and thus areas that have potential for mitigation
banking or targeted acquisition. However, it is important to note that these maps do not
capture all possible critical habitats and that any GIS analysis should be ground - truthed.
What this process does provide is a solid foundation for where to direct general efforts
and investigations for the suitability of certain areas to meet IAMP Policy 2.1.3. We hope
that you take our analysis into serious consideration for this process. We view these
natural resource elements as paramount to good land use planning, and their
consideration will be crucial to ensuring the successful creation of a
mitigation /acquisition strategy for the IAMP.
Immokalee Area Environmentally Significant Lands with Mitigation Potential
Natural Resources Overlay Values
o N I- 3
Least Environmentally
Significant
R h ro 1 0
0 0 NN 0
Most Environmentally
Significant
e] Immokalee footprint
County Boundary
Lake Trafford CONSERVANCY
�,, Collier County Major Roads Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Environmentally Significant Lands with Mitigation Potential
Natural Resources Overlay Values (with Aerial)
CJ N ti lb a h ro 00 Cb No ^N
Least Environmentally Most Environmentally
Significant Significant
0 Immokalee footprint
d County Boundary
Lake Trafford
Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer
Native Vegetation, incl. wetlands (using FLUCCS)
Immokalee footprint
County Boundary
Collier County Major Roads
'"swo.
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer - Landscape Connectivity (FWC)
o 1l 'to h A 0
No linkage Moderate Critical
Priority Linkage Priority Linkage
Immokalee footprint
�] County Boundary
ti Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
t ',; r;, , i.� = rr,
loft
e
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
Individual Data Layer - FNAI (FWQ
o Co h a ti
Increasing
Priority Habitats
W
W
JQ
Y
O
_.. "*1 ,PP
N
0 Immokalee footprint ;14,
ff] County Boundary
ti Collier County ' Maor Roads CONSERVANCY
� Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer - Roadless Habitat Patch (FWQ
O P% ti 1b A h 0 1 0 q NO
Increasing roadless No
habitat patch size
Immokalee footprint
County Boundary
Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
dom-
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer
Distance to Managed Lands 3.3km Buffer
0
0 Immokalee footprint
ff] County Boundary
'ti Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer
Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas (FWC)
j2 Immokalee footprint
d County Boundary
--\, Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer - Spatial Heterogeneity
ti lb tK
Increasing spatial heterogeneity
(measure of habitat diversity)
1b CO 1% lb Ch
0 Immokalee footprint
ff] County Boundary
--,, Collier County Major Roads
-44
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer - Listed Species Ranks(FWC)
O N rL 0.) tk h 6 1 0 No
No listed Threatened Endangered
species present species present species present
0 Immokalee footprint
d County Boundary
—, Collier County Major Roads
-�4�
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer - Species Richness (FWQ
ti 1) b, h ro WNo
IN
Number of species with potential habitat in the area
Immokalee footprint
County Boundary
ti Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer - Panther Zones (USFWS)
Dispersal
J Primary
Secondary
0 Immokalee footprint
ff] County Boundary '
Collier County Major Roads M Rds CONSERVANCY
� Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer
Scrub Jay Habitat (FWC)
0 Immokalee footprint
ED County Boundary
Collier County Major Roads
- *0
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer
Caracara Habitat (using FLUCCS)
4 "2.
Immokalee footprint
C] County Boundary
Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
Immokalee Area Natural Resource Layers
Individual Data Layer
Florida Forever Unacquired Boundaries (FWC)
0 Immokalee footprint
d County Boundary
--,, Collier County Major Roads
CONSERVANCY
Of Southwest Florida
RT
,mokA1EE•CRA
• MAS I LIZ PLAN UPDA I L
Map 5 -1
Immokalee Proposed
LR LR Future Land Use Map
HR
-• � �L / !tea /j � `�•P•
SR
1�1 C MU a !.J ' v
LR
LR 1
LR
APO
IN
CMU
MR
Legend
OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES
QImmokalee Urban Area Boundary
Collier County Arterial and Collector Roads
Collier County Local Roads
QWetlands Connected to Lake Trafford/
Camp Keais Strand System Overlay
SR - Seminole Reservation
Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area
Immokalee Future Land Use
URBAN DESIGNATION
URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT
RT - Recreational Tourist Subdistrict
LR - Low Residential Subdistrict
MR - Medium Residential Subdistrict
HR - High Residential Subdistrict
CMU - Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict
1 URBAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
IMU - Industrial Mixed Use Subdistrict
IN - Industrial Subdistrict
APO - Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000
Feet
a
N
7?A'CTAINC.
CONSULT`1NG
1 \ T Tl 1
M! Uk,.AkE cR-^
I, ,;tV� IvE t
Commu- .ya- I -- calpr,'- -'c yency
TI PI I I F I
Z
1
,mokA1EE•CRA
• MAS I LIZ PLAN UPDA I L
Map 5 -1
Immokalee Proposed
LR LR Future Land Use Map
HR
-• � �L / !tea /j � `�•P•
SR
1�1 C MU a !.J ' v
LR
LR 1
LR
APO
IN
CMU
MR
Legend
OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES
QImmokalee Urban Area Boundary
Collier County Arterial and Collector Roads
Collier County Local Roads
QWetlands Connected to Lake Trafford/
Camp Keais Strand System Overlay
SR - Seminole Reservation
Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area
Immokalee Future Land Use
URBAN DESIGNATION
URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT
RT - Recreational Tourist Subdistrict
LR - Low Residential Subdistrict
MR - Medium Residential Subdistrict
HR - High Residential Subdistrict
CMU - Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict
1 URBAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
IMU - Industrial Mixed Use Subdistrict
IN - Industrial Subdistrict
APO - Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000
Feet
a
N
7?A'CTAINC.
CONSULT`1NG
1 \ T Tl 1
M! Uk,.AkE cR-^
I, ,;tV� IvE t
Commu- .ya- I -- calpr,'- -'c yency
TI PI I I F I
BASE DENSITY COMPARISON
EXISTING Future Land Use
Low Residential
Mixed Residential
High Residential
Mixed Use
Recreational /Tourist
Abbrev.
LR
MR
HR
CC -MU + NC
RT
Acres
10405.6
463.9
1603.1
861.8
251.2
Base DU /AC
4
6
8
12
4
Max. # DUs
41,622.4
2,783.4
12,824.8
10,341.6
11004.8
PROPOSED Future Land Use
Low Residential
Medium Residential
High Residential
Commercial Mixed Use
Recreational /Tourist
Abbrev.
LR _
MR
HR
CMU
RT
Acres
7,746.0
1,165.0
1,597.0
1,137.0
442.0
Base DU /AC
4
6
8
16
4
Max. # DUs
30984.0
6990.0
12776.0
18192.0
1768.0
Change
- 10,638.4
4,206.6
-48.8
7,850.4
763.2
% Change
Max. DUs
(4 du /ac)
Totall
13585.6
LR
68,577.0
4,713.1
Totall
12,087.0
9,426.2
70710.0
2,133.0
3.11%
MR Y
Less LT /CKSSO Density* -692.5
MAXIMUM DENSITY COMPARISON (INCLUDES ALL BONUSES)
Total 1,440.5 2.10%
EXISTING Future Land Use
Low Residential
Mixed Residential
High Residential
Mixed Use
Recreational /Tourist
Abbrev.
LR
MR
HR
CC -MU + NC
RT
Acres
10405.6
463.9
1603.1
861.8
251.2
Max DU /AC
12
14
16
12
4
Max. # DUs
124,867.2
6,494.6
25,649.6
10,341.6
1,004.8
PROPOSED Future Land Use
Low Residential
Medium Residential
High Residential
Commercial Mixed Use
Recreational /Tourist
Abbrev.
LR
MR
HR
It','Aall
Acres
7,746.0
1,165.0
1,597.0
1,137.0
442.0
Max DU /AC
8
14
16
20
4
Max. # DUs
61968.0
16310.0
25552.0
22740.0
1768.0
Change
- 62,899.2
9,815.4
-97.6
12,398.4
763.2
% Change
-631.9
Total
13585.6
33.4
168,357.8
133.6
-400.8
12,087.0
133.6
128338.0
40,019.8
- 23.77%
*RT allowance for transient lodging density has been increased from 10 du /ac to 26 du /ac.
Less LT /CKSSO Density*
-
- 6,284.7
0.0
Total
- 6,304.5
- 27.50%
*LT /CKSSO Density Reductions
BASE
DENSITY
BONUS DENSITY
LT /CKSSO Future Land Use
Abbrev.
Acres
Max. DUs
(Standard)
Max. DUs
(4 du /ac)
Change
Max. DUs
(Standard)
Max. DUs
(4 du /ac)
Change
Low Residential
LR
1,178.3
4,713.1
4,713.1
0.0
9,426.2
4,713.1
- 41713.1
Medium Residential
MR Y
40.5
243.2
162.1
-81.1
567.4
162.1
-405.3
High Residential
HR
52.7
421.3
210.6
-210.6
842.6
210.6
-631.9
Commercial Mixed Use
CMU
33.4
534.4
133.6
-400.8
668.0
133.6
-534.4
Recreational /Tourist
RT
10.2
40.8
40.8
0.0
40.8
40.8
0.0
Total
1,315.11
5,952.7
5,260.2
-692.5
11,545.0
5,260.2
- 6,284.7