Loading...
CCPC Backup 01/15/2009 R CCPC REGULAR MEETING BACKUP DOCUMENTS JANUARY 15, 2009 AGENDA COURT REPORTER COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, JANUARY 15,2009, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE A V AILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBA TIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH TIlE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPRO V AL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 20, 2008, REGULAR MEETING; DECEMBER 4, 2008, REGULAR MEETING; DECEMBER 9, 2008, HORIZON STUDY MEETING 6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS - DECEMBER 2, 2008, REGULAR MEETING 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. Petition: VA-2008-AR-I3601, Okeechobee Inn, LTD, represented by Gina Green, p.E. of Green Engineering, Inc., is requesting a Variance ITom LDC Subsection 4.02.27, Specific Design Standards for the Immokalee-State Road 29A Commercial Overlay Subdistrict, to permit access to State Road 29 for a parcel having less than the minimum 440-foot street /Tontage width. The 9.04-acre subject property is located on the west side of State Road 29, just north of tbe Lake Trafford Road intersection, in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Immokalee. Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss, AICp) B. Petition: CU-2008-AR-13639, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, represented by Alan Brewer of Reynolds, Smith and Hills, is requesting a Conditional Use for a church in the Residential Single-Family (RSF-3) Zoning District, as specified in Section 2.03.02.A.l.c.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 4.63-acre subject property is located at 4935 23rd Court SW in Section 21, Township 49 South, Range 26 East of Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss, Aiel') 1 C. Petition: RZ-2008-AR-12930, Collier County Coastal Zone Management represented by Laura DeJohn of Johnson Engineering, Inc., requesting a Rezone from the RMF-6 (Residential Multi-family) and C-3 (Commercial Intermediate) zoning districts to the CF (Community Facility) zoning district to provide overflow parking for the Bayview Park boat launch. The + 2.13-acre subject property is located in Section 23, Township 50 South and Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss, AICP) D. Petition: PUDZ-2007-AR- I 2026, Stephen J. Lockwood, Trustee for SJL Realty II Trust. represented by Heidi Williams, AICP. of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., and Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esq., of Goodlette, Coleman, .Iohnson, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.. requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Savannah Place RPlJD. to aJJaw development of a maximum of 20 townhouse, single-family attached or single-family detached dwelling units. The subject 6.8H acre property is located on the south side of Orange Blossom Drive approximately l;2 mile west of Airport Road (CR 31), in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. CoIlier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem, AICp) 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PUDZ-2007-AR-12097, The Covenant Presbyterian Church of Naples, Inc. and Florida Community Bank, Inc., represented by Richard Yovanovich of Goodlette, Coleman, Johnson, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., are requesting a rezone from the Residential Single-family (RSF-l) Zoning District to the Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFpUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as Heavenly CFPUD, which would memorialize the existing church uses and would permit redevelopment consistent with a master site plan to a maximum of 100,000 square feet of houses of worship, children and adult day cares, a Pre-K through 3rd grade schoo], and various accessory uses; and an additional 20,000 square feet of children and adult day cares, Pre-K through 3rd grade schoo] and accessory uses contingent upon Conditional Use approval. The ]5.93-acre subject property is located at 6926 Trail Boulevard, and comprises the entire block hounded by Ridge Drive. West Street, Myrtle Road and Trail Boulevard in Section 3, Township 49 South, Range 25 East of eoIlier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss. AICP) READVERTlSED FROM I 1/06/08 B. Petition: VA-2008-AR-13756, Lee Wyatt, represented by Lauren Barber of Turrell and Associates, is requesting a front yard setback Variance for principal structures in the Mobile Home (MH) Zoning District from 25 feet to 16 feet. as required by Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.02.0 I, Selbacks ji,r Base Zoning D;str;cfs, to pennit a nine-foot setback; and a site alteration Variance to impact mangroves, pursuant to LDC Sob section 9.04.02.B.1. The approximately O. I 4-acre subject property is located on Lot 77, Otter Avenue, in Plantation Island, of Section 24, Tovmship 53 South, Range 29 East Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: John-David Moss, AICp) C. Petition: pUDZ-2007-AR-I 1320, Sembler Family Partnership #42, represented by Robert MuIhere, AICp of RW A, Inc and R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire. of Roctze] and Andress, requesting a rezoning from Rural Agriculture (A) zoning to Mixed-Use Planned Unit DevcIopment (MPUD) to be known as McMullen MPUD. The 19.32 acres Rural Agricultural zoned site is proposed to permit a mixed-use development. The rezoning petition allO\vs for a maximum of 122,000 square feet of medical office and medical support facilities, and up to 48 multi-family dwelling units, with allowances for modifications of commercial activates and residential uses for additional pennitted commercial uses. In no case shall the commercial square footage exceed 185,000 square feet. The subject property is generally located onc- half mile cast of Collier Boulevard (eR 951) on Rattlesnake-Hammock Road Extension, the south one-half of the Southeast one- quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 14, To\'vnship 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (eoordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Aiel') eONTINUTED TO 2/5/09 10. OLD BUSINESS II. NEW BUSINESS A. Distribution of the Collier County Sign Code draft revision to remove the elements declared unconstitutional by the Eleventh Circuit Court. The presentation will include an 8-10 minute explanation of the basic constitution law concepts that protect free speech in signage and which guided the revisions. (Coordinator: Catherine Fabacher, AICp) TO BE HEARD IMMEDIA TELY FOLLOWING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 2 12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 14. ADJOURN 1/15/08 cepe AgendaIRB/!ip :3 AGENDA ITEM 8-A RESOLUTION NO. 09- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA-2008-AR-13601, FOR A VARIANCE FROM SUBSECTION 4.02.27.A. OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, TO ALLOW ACCESS TO STATE ROAD 29 FOR A P ARCEL HAVING LESS THAN THE MINIMUM 440 FEET STREET FRONTAGE WIDTH, ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STATE ROAD 29 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance to Subsection 4.02.27.A. of the LDC to allow access to State Road 29 for a parcel having less than the minimum 440-foot street frontage width, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the Commercial Intermediate (C-3) Zoning District within the Immokalee-State Road 29 Commercial Overlay Subdistrict for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the LDC for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered alJ matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: I __ _ _~__"_"_ ,._._._____._..._._. "",'u._ .," , --.._-_.,--_.._~--,---_._-"--- The Petition Number V A-2008-AR-13601 tiled by Green Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Okeechobee Inn, Ltd., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: The Southerly 322.6 feet of the Northerly 645.1 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE II.) of the Northeast Quarter (NE \-4) of Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. Excepting therefrom the right of way for State Road No. 29 over and across the Easterly 100 feet thereof. be and the same hereby is approved for a variance to Subsection 4.02.27.A. of the LDC to allow access to State Road 29 for a parcel having less than the minimum 440-foot street frontage width, as shown on the plan attached as Exhibit "A", in the zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the conditions attached as Exhibit "B". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution does not waive any state or county requirements for owner to obtain a right-of-way permit for construction of a driveway connection. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of ,2009. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: , Deputy Clerk By: . DONNA FIALA, Chairman Approved as to fOlm and legal sufficiency: I'r-G ,o'i, 0' ;v1-- 'V \ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney 08-CPS-00884/15HFAC 12.22-0:5 2 \ . L-. 1\ -- , ~ o " . / o , - / - - o ~ J ~ i , o o ~ J i i ~ ~ '< m . - ~" -~..~~ - - - ------~--- -------~--- - , o w ~ ~ GINA R GREEN, -" - " 'w- . . ... -" - ~ " .... _"-_d>- '" M> .....UTA"'ll... Exhibit A -, ~ . IWIa "''*'';.,.f'" -.. - ~_r..( -.-. ~~ , . . . .--..-.---- - " " o ~ . . , i ~ " ~ " . " o " , ~ - - - 'II ~ ' -- . '0 , , J "'15 w III z ~~ 0 III - ~~ ~ . n > ',' n 0 0 - " I" ~ 0 - II " . 0 P n ~ " " n " n 0 , 0 < 5 < " , " " " q " . . w LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD ,'~----,'--'-"""~' . ,.-'._,',..'m.. LEE STREET CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL V A-200S-AR-13601 DECEMBER 18, 2008 1. All access to State Road 29 from the 9.04-acre tract shall be through the access location approved as part of this Variance, even if portions of the property are subsequently sold to another owner. 2. The slope easement depicted on the site plan adjacent to the access drive shall be modified, if needed, to include public and/or private utilities. 3, The site plan attached as Exhibit A, entitled "Conceptual Site Plan" is conceptual in nature, with the final location of the access point to State Road 29 to be detennined at the time of permitting by the by the Florida Department of Transportation. EXHIBIT B I"G \'Q'i ,^~!' '].\ '. \']. \'V II i I i , I , I I , , AGENDA ITEM 8-B RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF A CHURCH AND PLACE OF WORSHIP WITHIN AN RSF-3 ZONING DISTRICT AT 4935 23RD CT. S.W., IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for the expansion of a Church and Place of Worship to include 2,588 square feet in building additions in the Residential Single Family - Three Zoning District (RSF-3), on the property described in Exhibit "B", and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit nAn) that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 10.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Page 1 of3 __ ___, _~__.__._ ___.__"..'._",.,._,,_. ."_'~_'.~. "';_.' H Petition CU-2008-AR-13639, filed by Alan Brewer of Reynolds Smith and Hills, Inc., representing The Church of the Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, with respect to the property described in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to the Collier County Land Development Code in the Residential Single Family - Three Zoning District (RSF-3), for the expansion of a Church and Place of Worship to include 2,588 square feet in building additions in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "D," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this day of ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: , Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: s(...J Steven T. Williams Assistant County Attorney Page 2 of3 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.04.03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with t~and Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes /' No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes /NO C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~ affect or _ Affect mitigated by _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent roperties and other property in the district: Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. DATE: (L/nl/ol I I COMMISSIONER: f EXHIBIT A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: I. Section 2.04,03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use, 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency wit the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B, Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes ~ No ___ C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use ithin district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. DATE: /cJ.-//ljaf COMMISSIONER: EXHIBIT A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.04.03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes / No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: .../ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes ,./ No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. . DATE: /.7-/.#-6% COMMISSIONER: EXHIBIT A ..._____m."...~__..__~._"__,,_~"..=___....~_~_......__.~,_.~ _ FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2,04.03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2, Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with e Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes / No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: / No affect or Affect rnitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes vi No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, th stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appea DATE: IZ-jl1ls COMMISSIONER: ~11W Si'\M\2\~ EXHIBIT A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.04,03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes /' No B, Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes / No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: / ./ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes / No Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. DATE: I~ (Ill/Of' COMMISSIONER: //c? /, . . , / /// ,,' " L-.---" EXHIBIT A n_ __"'~__"_'^_._',_,_".___"","'. __,____"" _ ___~.."._'"' n....._n_..'_. ...__. FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.04,03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use, 2, Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A, Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes vi No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes / No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: V No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes I No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. DATE: :.L / f {)f COMMISSIONER~I1d., ~/d (ldJ~ EXHIBIT A FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: I. Section 2.04,03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use, 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with !he Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes / No B, Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yesd No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~o affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above [mdings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. DATE:JZ,' 1,3' Cil> COMMISSIONER: ~p ~ EXHIBIT A -, .. _..._~-..~.,_.'" '-_.."--"-,."........~_.__._,..,....__.. ~- ... FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2,04,03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2, Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with t Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & e Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~o affect or __ Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes~ No DATE: ):2 ~/f/c?' COMMISSIONER' attached) be Based on the above fmdings, this conditional use should, with sti recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals. EXHIBIT A ;:?c ,6. ,/ Va /'cfY C. U FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PETITION CU-2008-AR-13639 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.04,03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2, Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes I No B, Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes / No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ---/No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes /' , No DATE: 'L 18 08 COMMISSIONER: 'th stipulations, (copy attached) be Is. Based on the above findings, this conditional use shoul recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning App EXHIBIT A "._.,--~-- .--....-- --,,--~------- .---.-.'" ~~" .., -,-,..._-_....,---,~- LEGAL DESCRIPTION GOLDEN GATE CITY UNIT 4, BLOCK 119, LOT 1IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGES 107- 116, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA N (Back) N 89d29'53"E 450.00 MEASURED N 90dOO'00"E 450.00 PLAT S (Front) CB=N82d08' ll"W 450.00MEAS. CD=447.57 D=16d43'51" R=1538.17 L=449.l6 T=226.l9 CB-N8ld38'04"W PLAT CE=447,57 E (Side) SOOd30'07"E 397.65 MEASURED SOOdOO'OO"E 397,65 PLAT W (Side) NOOd30'07"W 331.48 MEASURED NOOdOO'OO"W 331.48 PLAT Exhibit B . ~~ , 1-< 0 , , 0 . ,< ~;H ~ . E li :It -. 0 . "' ~ ii~IU o~ il ~ "" .. io~ ~ tE~...t jiim II 00 u , ~........ ~; to 0 ....ol!:' II . 0 ..t..-. ~! Ie 0 I~!, "l!" 00 0 '" .- ~:3~ 11 . l:l.. . ~ r:!: :! 0" ~ ",;..., 00 ., . .- ~ - . o~ . " " - . "". ! . "0 - - ~ ,",0 , - - . ! ..... 'I,i .! I " !I',' ! I" I' I ' ! ',' I! 'i,l! .: HI !~, !ili; ! l'l'I'IIII'I!1 i Iii'; hllll " . !l ,~! .!. ; illl,I,lllllilli:I"IIII!~ III " ," J ,~I d 0'11 "I "I . " l!!i3 1,1~1I1 kill U 1';~ ~ ~~I ~I I I I I I I Ill! II i~!lIH;lI!h, Initl ijll! !i : ,!l111i i Ii i lili 'lli,:I: I!I-lill 1!1~!!!HI II , , , , 1.1 1I1l! 1111 ~CDOc* I! I I: 'In ~i Ii :Hn 11 'Ii I 001900-0'" . .! I 'II , . 1, !l I I !! Il I ,. II , " i I " hili!. , !, ' II' Ii 11!!.I! I!!dll 'I r=III!i! Ii lUll " I. "' .....,; . , , ill I , , ill , , I , , 'II . , , I I , I ,I: I __.I , I 'I' . I I I , il i il J , . - I , , , , , , \ ,~ e ~I* i . "':':0 n , ~ ,. . i" , C .. . . .0 ~ 1 , I! " ; 0 " ::> ,-, . i 0 Do II! , < < < ,~ I ' o-z .' llIC ,0 ~~ , , , .. j/:/: u~ , 0 ,0 j' " ~ j" ! , , I! z'" . .. . , . .! 0 , . .. ! I ," . ~ 11 ; . I u I 0 , , 0 . I . i 0 . . . I . , i . '.,n - Ii . , , " ; . . - l .. 0 I . ; ; ,~ '::' , , II,", ' ~,~, " I j'lllll' : ~f~ : i:: I~ I..!;'",.. , ~"'" , I.....t',;" , '''-l. I, "\1 ! Ii!:;] i ~~, ": : ~;: :;1 , tr' :d: J , , , , , " .' " ., w, ", z, ~, <' c' "' n' N' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I , , , , , . 1'- . I l , '11 ~~ " " ,j '''' C ,:11"1 i;""b ,i "H ,;ll~ ,,\ - , I "" " " , 'M'S3::lVl:ll:f31.H.L6t- .. -- - - - -- -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - --- - - - - - -- --- - -- ---- . -~-----.. ""'ii....~_ ~... -- -...........- - -- - --------------------------------------------- ---- - - - - - - -- - - -- --- - - - -- --- - - -- ~ - --- ::: =_:::, ~"~" =' 0 O'~_: 0 0 0 0;=: :::::: =': = ~ 0 0:0: 0.-: :''''''::0_:,: 0 :: ::=: = "'0'''': :_0':'.0,0 '::"'_O:.:.::.'O.:~ - - - -- ---- --- -- - - --- - -- -- - - - --- -- --- .,.. " .' -~.. -- -...~.....---....-..". -- --..... -- ---------=--.....,...---.... 'i- ,....:.-~----..:. - ________-1r:L-__ --."..,,"..-..-u."......r""'.....-~~----...,',..-..-...-.----" '-- - - - -" ~--~-..':~--------"- ~ - I ~:j I ,~,~:,~~.::,:,."-::..;~;oi,:'!:;,:..F~o.~:..;.,; :~:;: m"o&" =="22ii)F==' =" ["b I, liUW~I ~iir~t if ::,':, II - i111~ IJC,;U,:O; ijlt::! III 1;< i'I' \~.? {lID I. : I, I ~( ,', :: : .. 4 '",J " l 11 ! I{'-~:' : 1, . \ ' !, I ,1 , --~.. I , ',,..-, I" ",' , ",~i't t'! I, ,-'......-~.-:.:l. ,," ~ '_::y-. "' ,U. ,j .,11._ .' ~" ,_ I J r ,-. I '1. '.,-.1(,' .-,'., ,'-- 'lii;:~~"q": r: i,f.l" c :~ ~. -~(:\ .'t"l,. '" ',1- --I-tLc..\ .- ""--'~1" 1 ,,::r': =--_.-\~--- 'i :: ,"; " .1 . _ ." ~ ' , ~ ~ ) L- " . , ' , _ ~ _ _ _ __ __..J '-_ _.._ I _ ! y. ,J' : t 1"'- _.-.--._~-,~-",----,-.--, ",.., " '". ",,;~ ",--'"",..\..J ,'~r_.. '- '. '1"" -.. ': -' '.....,- ',,, ..."'-...... """'" ," -'.'. ................~........... .' . . "~~'~;:~'__ ______m__ _.,.:____"H --.--~: .. -- ~;i;~~=~.::-::..::-::.=-.::-..::.=:-=~ --- .~..._... .,-.-.. - - ., -..,........ 'lIi~.......i'" ,1. _:~...~~ _OJ.; _I L 1__.1_ i ..L " " tl' , , ;..,' ~ , ' " " 'I " " " " -', \ l " ." . =iw. . - - . .. . - ~i~ a ;; II '" .. " ,,' --- ---------~' " , , 'M-S.133,HS~.LOS .. , , , , I ~S - - ----'------ -- - -- --,-- -- - - ---,--- ---,..--- ---,---- ~:::; -- " ,. .., '" 1~),....1l't<J"1 I .. l.ll'H' ~." I """ll'-.I1 " il - " ,,' il il il il -I . l , . . - - , ----- , , , , , , , , , , , , I , i , I , r.," I , , il I , , I Iii , , 1,1 I , , Iii Exhibit C - ----,._....--~,_._-_._'"'"~'"....".,.._--- -",..__..~ '...,".,-..-.......".-..,....."".... CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CU-2008-AR-13639 December 18, 2008 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, identified as "Naples Meetinghouse Conceptual Plan," prepared by Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc" and dated December 8, 2008, The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for Conditional Use approval only, The final design must be compliance with all applicable federal, state, and county laws and regulations. 2. Day care operations shall be limited to those provided during church services only, 3. The number of paved parking spaces on the site shall be limited to 177 spaces. Exhibit D AGENDA ITEM 8-C CCPC Consent Agenda, 1/15/09 Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), findings from the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) December 4, 2008 hearing on RZ-2008- AR-12930, Bayview Park. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their December 4, 2008 meeting, and voted 6-2 to forward it to the BCC with a recommendation of denial for its failure to comply with the following provisions of the GMP: · The proposal is not consistent with Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 12.2,7, as determined by Comprehensive Planning staff, since that provision applies only to undeveloped properties and some of the parcels proposed with the subject petition are already developed with single- family homes, · The proposal is not necessarily consistent with the Recreational and Open Space (ROSE) Policy 1.1.5 since the provision of off-site boat trailer parking is not the only alternative to achieving improved Level of Service (LOS) standards. · The proposal is not consistent with ROSE Policy 1.3.1, as determined by Comprehensive Planning staff, since it limits automobile and pedestrian access to where the location is appropriate. (The CCPC considered the proposed parking lot to be inappropriate for the location.) · The proposal is not consistent with ROSE Policy 1.4,2, as determined by Comprehensive Planning staff, since the Parks and Recreation Department failed to coordinate the provision of 15 boat trailer parking spaces at Hamilton Harbor PUD with the City of Naples (which was authorized by Collier County to review and approve the portion of the PUD within its jurisdictional boundaries). · The proposal is not consistent with Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4, as determined by Zoning and Land Development Review staff, which requires new developments to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding uses. The CCPC also noted the proposal's failure to comply with the following provisions of Subsection 10.03,05,1.2 of the Land Development Code, as noted in the Staff Report: 1, 2,3,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15, and 18. Staff has received 18 letters of objection and two petitions opposing the project from the surrounding neighbors, - ,--.---.- ~, - ~--,_.~ --.-.. - -,...", _._-,.__..,-----,~---_. .. " '-------- AGENDA ITEM 8-D ORDINANCE NO. 2009 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSNE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 6.8H-ACRE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A MAXIMUM OF 20 DWELLING UNITS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE APPROXIMATELY Y2 MILE WEST OF AIRPORT ROAD (CR 31), IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Heidi Williams, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, PA, and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of GoodJette, Coleman, and Johnson, et aI, representing Stephen J. Lockwood, Trustee of the SJL Realty Trust II dated October 28, 2005, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Savannah Place RPUD, to allow development of a maximum of20 dwelling units in accordance with the Savannah Place RPUD Exhibits, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as CP\07 -CP S-00703 \Ordinance Rev. 12129/08 - HFAC Page 1 of2 described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by supermajority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2009. ATTEST: DWIGHT E BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: ---- DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN , Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency v /1;1'\ /~'?o ,'> Heidi Ashton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: List of Permitted Uses Development Standards Master Plan and Water Management Plan Legal Description Development Commitments Specific to the Project CP\07 -CP S-007 0 3 IOrdinance Rev, 12/29/08 - HFAC Page 2 of2 EXHIBIT A SA V ANNAH PLACE RPUD PERMITTED USES 1. Residential Tract: The residential tract of the Savannah Place RPUD is approximately 6.66"' acres, which are to be developed with up to 20 dwelling units and related accessory uses. A. Permitted Uses No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Principal Uses a. Single-family, detached dwelling units; b. Single-family, attached dwelling units; c. Townhouses, no greater than 140 feet in width; d. Any other use that is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) according to the process described in the Land Development Code (LDC); e. All dwelling units must be of the same type; i.e. a mixture of townhouses and single-family detached units would not be allowed. 2. Accessory Uses a. Garages; b. Carports; c. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; d. Guardhouses, gatehouses and access control structures; e. Community clubhouse (must be located east of the internal roadway, if provided); f. Recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, playground equipment or other amenities (must be located east of the internal roadway, if provided, except those serving one dwelling unit); g. Essential services, including but not limited to, water, sewer, cable, electric and other utilities to serve the principal uses; h. Any other use that is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses, as determined by the BZA according to the process described in the LDC. B. Development Standards Table I, contained in Exhibit B, sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Residential Tract of the Savannah Place RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth PUD Exhibits revised 12-30-08 per CCPC,doc Page 1 of 7 '''-.-".--.--.----..''----...-----. -'--, --...,._.._,..~"..----~_.~...,_._.._. - herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. II. Preserve Tract The Preserve Tract of the Savannah Place RPUD is approximately 0.15010 acres, which shall meet native vegetation retention requirements, A. Permitted Uses No building or structure, or part thereof, shal1 be erected, altered or used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Principal Uses a. Native vegetation preserve. B. Development Standards The Preserve Tract of the Savannah Place RPUD shal1 comply with standards contained in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat PUD Exhibits revised 12-30-08 per CCPC, doc Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT B SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Tables 1 and 1.1 below set forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in the applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. Table 1 Residential Tract Development Standards Minimum Lot Area 5,000 s.f. 3,500 s.f. nla Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 35 feet nla Minimum Floor Area 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. nla Minimum Setbacks: PUD Boundaries, except 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet east side .--- . PUD Boundary - east side 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Front (see note 1 20 feet 20 feet nla Side 7.5 feet 6 feet or 0 feet nla Rear 15 feet 15 feet nla --.. Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Distance Between 15 feet 12 feet 15 feet Structures Maximum Zoned Hei 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Maximum Actual Hei 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Note 1: Driveways shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk to the face of the garage door or building fayade in order to prevent parking across pedestrian ways. PUD Exhibits revised 12-30-08 per CCPC.doc Page 3 of 7 '-__~'~_______'''__''''_'._e' ...~~._._..__"~_..,, , _"'---'''--''_''''''_'''_'-'''-'--~'-''''''''''- Table 1.1 Residential Tract Development Standards Minimum Lot Area n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum Lot Width n/a n/a n/a n/a Mirrimum Setbacks: PUD Boundary, except adjacent to Orange 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 20 feet Blossom Drive PUD Boundary, adjacent to 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Orange Blossom Drive Front see note 1 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 7.5 feet Rear 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 15 feet --- I ---..-.-- Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 25 feet I . ... ------ Minimum Distance Between o feet o feet o feet o feet i\ccessory Structures I , 1__~_lQfeet Maximum Zoned Height_.__ I 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet ".---- Maximum i\ctual Height __~ 40 feet 40 feet : 40 feet 40 feet , Note 1: Driveways shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk to the face of the garage door or building fayade in order to prevent parking across pedestrian ways. Table 2 Preserve Tract Development Standards No development standards are required since no structures are anticipated to be located within the Preserve Tract. Development shall be in accordance with LDC standards. PUO Exhibits reVised 12-30-08 per CCpedac Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT ST AN[)ARDS Tables I and 1.1 below set forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in the applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. Table I Residential Tract Development Standards ~.---~--'" ",-- -.---..- ~ - ~ - SINGLE- SINGLE- , FAMILY, FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE DETACHED ATTACHED PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES --..-.'. Minimum Lot Area ___ 5,000 s~f_~__ 3,500 s.f n/a Minimum Lot Width ,""~H'" . '"' -.-- -- Minimum Floor Area --'000,"- '"'":=r:~ Minimum Setbacks: --~.~----- PU D Boundaries, except 25 feet , 25 feet 25 feet east side , PU D Boundary - east side 15 feet 15 feet I 15 feet Front (~ee note 1) 20 feet 20 feet __ 20 feet , Side (see note 2L 7.5 feet 6 feet or 0 feet o feet or 7.5 feet , - I Rear 15 leet 15 feet 15 teet ~ -~ , >--_ .Preserv~__"~_____ 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet ------ --~ - ----- -- --------- ~- ; 1-" -, S =1 ~ --I I Mll1l111Um Dlstdllce BetVll:cn liS feet I 17 feet I I S fee~1 I Structures - -, - ~ I Ma,-illllllll 7:oll~ZI_Height ~. -----:1fl~~t_ · ~ I~e~ ; ~1O fe~:~:== Maximum Actl1~llleighl , 40 _t~~_~=r 401~~~_~~2.!t:~_~ Note t: Driveways shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk to the t~lce of the garage door or building fac;ade in order to prevent parking across pedestrian ways. Note 2: Zero foot minimum side setback on one side of building as long as a minillllllll 15 foot separation between principal structures is maintained. Note 3: Principal ancl accessory uses shall not be permitted to encroach into any required PUD perimeter sethack. I PUD Exhibits revised 1-15-09 per CCPC (2) Page 3 of 7 Formatted Table '1 Table I.J Residential T,'act Development Standards SINGLE- FAMILY, DETACHED A 'CESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Setbacks: PUD Boundary, except adjacent to Orange Blossom Drive PUD Boundary, adjacent to Orange Blossom Drive Front (see note 1) 20 feet l ~~~r_-=-----! --~~:: I Preserve i 10 feet ._~..."-_. .__...._~-r---------- MinimulTl Distance Between i 0 feet Accessory Structllre~ Ma~imUIl1 Zoned He,'ight" ~~O fee,t Ma.ximlllll Actllall--I~tgh~ __~~Q fect_ n/a -------- n/a 10 feet 25 feet SINGLE- FAMILY, ATTACHED n/a nia 10 feet 25 feet 20 feet ..--.---.... 5 feet __,_..u________. 5 feet --'.-------... 10 fect o ICct 10 feet 40 feet CLUBHOUSEI TOWNHOUSES RECREATION BUILDINGS n/a __n____________..__ n/a n/a ------ n/a 15 feet 20 feel 25 fect 25 ICet 10 feet ----.,- I 5 feet I 5 feet 10 feet 20 feet 7.5 feet --------;---- . --T:.; fC~-1 ---! 25 feel ;:/;ee~t -~ 40 feet -- - o feet 30 feet 40 feet Note I: Driveways shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk to the face of the garage door or building f3(;:ade in order to prevent parking across pedestrian ways. Table 2 Preserve Tract Development Standards No development standards are required since no structures are allowed to be located within the Preserve Tract. Development shalt he in accordance with LDC standards. I PUD Exhibits revised 1-15-09 per ccpe (2) Page 4 of7 Formatted Table 11 lj '" ii .. o Ii ! 1! !! I! Ii ., I. ., , I' I i I I !. i( I, " ii Ii " ::" Ii )' . .' . ! ! o .. , I' ,! I' ,I ii ii !] !! ii II " 'I I " 1"",-- 11_._:';- II t~ :i ~t; I, ~~ Ijfl' " 0 " . , ! .. .. ii' " , 'i I, , I' . . , I I. r' I.,. ,,, ._J)I __..m_, I , ill i" .mJJj , , ' , ' t-..--....---i , ' , ' - ' , ' , ' 1-.,- I , ____m__j , ' I ..--- i . , 1. r jI 51 , , , , . , . - . , , . ... " "' .. o .. " . , . l' ~~ II .. " " ,- . ., ,. . - II I << . H: w,; .. . , i . . l . , j I! 'I I. " , l' .; ;.;-~ Hi . ., . .' ! .! C ~:! ! I~ :: 3.; g IS"; ; ;!I : !- -- .. . . , , . 11 .. . >' .' ~:! ,: 11 o. . , , I' , II, I ! !'!~ ~ .. .. .. c; of- ::J- __~.~_"_._'w"._ ... , , , ---~"-_.( , "",",.,w,""""L..... """_...,-. ....,_.,,-f'<>oOI\., . .. l' -;; ~ I ! g jl: ... ~ l! ~ _ ~ i'" i E 8 ; ~ :; I . I ~ , I z "- < '" ~ ~ tj ~ w u" ~ ~ ..< ffi~ '" "~ x< ~ We' " ~ w ;;: U Z ;;j 0 u ! ! o - " i " ; ., 0 ll' . , " l " . l' !' ~I l'!~ " I! I; 11 ..0 .!S IPI , .' !!\j ~o 18 jl . .! ~ 11 1, . I , ! I j i ~~ ~~ ," , -, ;~ .. ~I ~~il tjjh o. . ~!;l ! i ",.il i , o. Ie ~~. l ~Ji. I "I" . ;:i Ii! to ' cA I , i, ll,---'-...--'-...--'---"-' ,---- -.--.---- . _ "'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ..<~-;~c-;,-;~-;~c:,---"c---...----...----...-'-- : I' I' . - - -~:::,:::::,: .:, ~} ~ ~ r!5""~ '" i' i ".' I~ . ~ .~~~ ~.1, I,"v-~ ~ ~I"L, >;",,' ..' , O'!' .,' "i-L- t .~ ~~ . ,'I I .-"'.-- .--. ~ "~ g ~;,:; ____ . ~ fr',' -. ~ I!. g", !,; ,_(:.o,:"c'_~_::~"': -~~ 0 ~ !!!i i ~, ',' '''~'-:::.,c:/'' ot'i,! ~,,' ~~ '.' . ~ I;! ! ~ !.'.' ~ L i 'I . I ~"I ,I ~., ~u -'l..J:' .,.,',,: i! l'~"'--------_._--" ..s:. ,- '. ,i .., \ ~ ." I pO ~ . ',' ~~ ," \ >'" ~L" . 1 f- .,;::' '" ' (i;1- 0::: 0 I,; .. ~ "I W ~:5 ;j! H! i:\! i 0::: ~f':", ij: I 'I ~ i,. ~.. ! ,,~ . I ~ i ~ ~ I ,~' . .'. i ~ '" ~ ',.' ------ ' . ..,.:.....'... ;" ' IJ................... I i ,:.c"'yi~r-'''.:'''-c'''c:'',''',''c,iF'::::)'::.; ~-~" ~.~. [',' ,ll; i~l~ ;~n. , ' 1--.--- " , --- , ' I ' ,---- ! , g~ -, i . , ! , . . '- . - " , . . , , . 1 . l @l~ . I .-..--- EXHIBIT D SA V ANNAH PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE SOUTHERLY 796.70 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 470.61 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHERLY 398.35 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 796.7 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 470.61 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "B" OF THE CROSSINGS, MILL RUN, PLAT BOOK 15, PAGES 39 THROUGH 41, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ON THE RlGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RlGHT OF WAY NORTH 89042'58" EAST 265.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 01033'49" EAST 295.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89042'58" WEST 265.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF THE CROSSINGS, MILL RUN; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH 01033'49" WEST 295.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED. PUD Exhibits revised 12-30-08 per CCPCdac Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT E SAVANNAHPLACERPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. Regulations for development of the Savannah Place RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. 2. Transportation: A. If the entrance is to be gated, the face of said gate shall be located so as to maintain no less than a 100- foot throat length to the southerly edge of pavement at the entrance intersection with Orange Blossom Drive. B. The developer shall contribute his fair share of the future intersection improvements at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. Fair share is required to be quantified and paid prior to approval of the first development order on this project. 3. Water Management: A. Prior to submittal of the application for final development order, the developer will coordinate the design and construction of a single three-inch (maximum) bleeder into the Orange Blossom Road storm drain system. The coordination and approval will be with the Collier County Storrnwater Management and Road Maintenance departments of the Transportation Division and the Engineering Department of the Community Developrnent and Environmental Services Division. 4. Landscaping: A. If the developer builds single-family, attached or single-family, detached dwelling units, the developer will provide Type B landscape buffer vegetation within the ten foot width. If multi-family dwelling units are built then LDC-required Type B landscape buffers will be provided in the standard 15 foot width. PUO Exhibits revised 12-30-08 per CCPC.doc Page 7 of 7 -_._--,,-, - ,.---.~._._._.."._' ....... ,,-",'- ".---..-..-,.,-. - AGENDA ITEM 9-A c. 4J my County ~,~ .....~-~p- -..I SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2008 RE: PETITION: PUDZ-2007-AR-12097, HEA VENL Y COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) This item was most recently scheduled for the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) December 4, 2008 public hearing; however, due to an advertising error, it was continued to the CCPC's January 15,2009 public hearing date. It was the applicants' intention to utilize the additional six weeks gained from the continuance to resolve outstanding issues with the surrounding community. However, as of the writing of this supplemental staff report, staff has not yet received a revised version of the CFPUD document reflecting any changes. Nevertheless, the applicant's newly appointed agent, Richard Y ovanavich, has assured staff that all of the proposed changes will result in a reduclion of impacts on the surrounding properties. According to Mr. Y ovanavich, the maximum permitted heights proposed in the most recent iteration of the CFPUD document (submitted to staff for review on October 14, 2008) would be further reduced; one access point to the site would have its hours of operation limited; an elevation depicting the massing of the church proposed for construction on Tract A would be submitted; and other such modifications will be proposed. Because all of the changes would be reductions in terms of their impact, another Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was not required of the applicants; and Mr. Y ovanovich was granted permission from the CCPC Chairman to present the proposed revisions to the CFPUD document on the floor at the public hearing. Because Zoning and Land Development Review staff was preparing this supplemental staff report, Environmental Services staff requested that a revised summary of their review be submitted to the CCPC. It is Environmental Services staffs hope that the following summary more clearly characterizes their position on the subject petition: The retained vegetation retention requirement was evaluated separately for the developed and undeveloped portions. The developed portion of the site has only retained trees. To meet native vegetation retention requirements on the developed portion of the site, a minimum of 44 native canopy trees shall be planted to replace 1 -"'''---.--....- the eXlstzng native trees that will be removed Fom this portion of the PUD. Regarding the undeveloped portion of the site, 0.8 acres of native vegetation existed on the site. A minimum of 0,12 acres of native vegetation (0,8 acres X required 15 percent = O. ] 2 acres) is required in addition to the 44 native canopy trees, The applicants have proposed to incorporate the 44 native trees into the perimeter buffers adjacent to West Street and Mvrtle Road to .fi,rther enhance the vegetation within these areas. They are also proposing to recreate the 0.12 acres of native vegetation in a dry storm water management area in the western portion of the site (labeled on the Master Plan as CPfor "created preserve "). However, South Florida Water Management District allows only minimal plantings with maintenance requirements including mowing within drv stormwater management areas, These plantings are not consistent with either recreated preserve planting or preserve management plan requirements in the LDC 771e 0,12 acre of preserve for this site must be recreated due to a violation of the Exotic Vegetation Removal Permit issued for the undeveloped lot. Native understory was mechanically removed from this parcel and this removal further damaged the root ~ones of the slash pines on site which contributed to the destruction of the canopv. Furthermore, section 10.02.06 E of the LDC requires that mirigation for permit violations recreate the vegetative community that was lost. This section requires the mitigation to restore the habitat that previously existed on the site, which was an upland habitat (i.e, pine flatwoods) rather than a wetland. Finally, GMP CCME Ii. I. J (5) allows onlv for receipt of treated stormwater and the site plan as currently shown would result in untreated storm water being discharged into the created preserve. The applicant contends that there is no prohibition in the LDC for the proposal and therefore has shown the recreated preserve within the (by storm water management area on the Master Plan; and that such re-created preserves have been previously approved for St. Agnes Catholic Church, St. John the Evangelist, and private commercial projects like Capital Center. However, the construction plans for the two churches referenced above have required County preserves separate from water management areas. The Capital Center plan was permilled as part of a Settlement Agreement and is not a valid comparison to this project. As such, in order for the PUD to be consistent with GMl' and LDC requirements for retained natIve vegetation, several conditions of approval relative to the proposed required preserve have been incorporated (see "Exhibit G, Conditions of Approval "fi)r a list of these stipulations, which have also been included in the "Staff Recommendation" portion ofthis report). Assuming the proposed changes presented at the hearing do result in a reduction of impacts on the surrounding properties as purported, the Department of Zoning and Land Development Review staffs recommendation remains the same, as noted in the previous staffreport dated November 6, 2008, As such, staff recommends that the CCPC forward PUDZ-2007-AR-12097 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to stipulations contained in the Exhibit H, dated October 7, 2008, which are attached to the ordinance. PUDZ-2007-AR-/2097, HFA VENLY CFPUD PREPARED BY: .. JO -DAVID MOSS, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: {21L-L-lo~ DATE H I I ASHTON-CICKO ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY j RA YM D BELLO S, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW /2. 11 - D<;;: DATE xL ~ \...()J , \7 /19 /.J2B S\oJ'SAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR 'DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: I~Pa/o~ PH K. SCHMITT, ADM ISTRATOR ( D~TE MUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN DATE Tentatively scheduled for the February 10,2009 Board of County Commissioners Meeting PUDZ-2007-AR-J2097, HEA VENLY CFPUD . -"- ^-.-.....,"- ~-"---_.. --, '"~..,,-."'._,-.~._..- ORDINANCE NO. 08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A SINGLE- FAMILY (RSF-I) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE HEAVENLY CFPUD, LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 15.93+ ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Michael R. Fernandez of Planning Development, Inc., representing The Covenant Presbyterian Church of Naples, Inc, and Florida Community Bank, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 3, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the RSF-l Zoning District to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District, known as The Heavenly CFPUD, in accordance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly, Page 1 of2 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: , Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: &tJ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F - List of Developer Commitments Exhibit G - Graphic Depiction & Guide of Vertical Building Height Exhibit H - Conditions of Approval CP\08-CP$-00840\Ordinance- HF AC Page 2 of2 "_'_'"_'_,M_'.~_'_.__ w,_".."_~'._.,__",..,_..,~....., "--~--'--'~""'''''-~'.._''-~''-' -- HEAVENLY COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) EXHIBIT A GENERAL: Development of the Heavenly CFPUD shall he in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections and parts of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. (TRACT A) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than thc following: A. Principal Uses: I. House(s) of worship with a maximum seating capacity of I ,000 individuals. B. Accessory Uses: I. Religious Educational Classrooms and Chorus Rehearsal Room 2. Social/Meeting and Activity Center 3. Administrative Offices 4. Child/Adult Day Care / Pre-KJKindergarten / School, limited to I s( through 3rd; with no more than a combined cumulative total of 220 students/individuals enrolled/attending for the entire CFPUD. The allocation to Tract A shall be 170, but may be reallocated by mutual agreement of the Tract A and B owners [if in diflerent ownership] provided the total number of students/individuals for the entire CFPUD does not exceed 220. 5. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures; except that parking garages are prohibited. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Child/Adult Day Care t Pre-KJKindergarten / School, limited to 1st through 3rd; for enrollrnentlserving more than a cumulativc total of 220 students/individuals for the entire CFPUD, The square footage of any approved conditional use shall be included within the maximum accessory use square footage of 72,000 square feet within Tract A, and in no event shall the square footage of all the structures within the entire CFPUD exceed 100,000 square feet; except as may be approved in item C.2 below. 2. Up to an additional 20,000 square feet of accessory use(s). Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page2of21 D, Temporary Uses: 1. Temporary building structures may be utilized to accommodate existing uses in the initial redevelopment construction transition period. The maximum period of use of such temporary building(s) shall be 30 months, but in no event shall be utilized beyond 90 days after receipt of the certificate of occupancy for the first new permanent building. Any such building(s) shall meet CFPUD setbacks requirements for new structures. Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 3 0[21 _"-_.~...__.._-._.~._- _,.,.. _.,_","_'.'..'''.' '_'<"_"_.~_.>_"."'_M"'__'_ (TRACT B) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof; shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: I, House(s) of worship with a maximum seating capacity of 200 individuals. B. Accessory Uses: I, Religious Educational Classrooms and Chorus Rehearsal Room 2. SociaIJMeeting and Activity Center 3. Administrative Offices 4. Child/Adult Day Care / Pre-KlKindergarten / School, limited to 1st through 3rd; with no more than a combined cumulative total of 220 students/individuals enrolled for the entire CFPUD. The allocation to Tract B shall be 50, but may be reallocated by mutual agreement of the Tract A and B owners [if under different ownership] provided the total number of students/individuals for the entire CFPUD does not exceed 220. 5. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures; except that parking garages are prohibited. C. Conditional Uses: 1. Child/Adult Day Care / Pre-K1Kindergarten / School, limited to 1st through 3'd; for enrollment/serving more than a cumulative total of 220 students/individuals for the entire CFPUD. The square footage of any approved conditional use shall be included within the maximum accessory use square footage of 14,400 square feet within Tract B, and in no event shall the square footage of all the structures within the entire CFPUD exceed 100,000 square feet; except as may be approved as a Conditional Use for Tract A. 2. An increase in maxirnum seating capacity, maximum parking spaces and/or maximum square footage allocation for the house(s) of worship. Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 4 of21 EXHIBIT B TABLE I (for Tract A) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (for Tract A) Table I, together with the text which follows below, sets forth the development standards for land uses within Tract A of this CFPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP). The redevelopment program of this CFPUD is based on a 25 year build-out. PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY AND CONDITIONAL USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 14010 acres N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 538 ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS (from right-of- way) Existing The greater of 30 f1, or the zoned height of SPS structure Expanded buildings(S) 50 ft. for expanded portion SPS New structures 200 ft.; except, 50 ft. from Trail Boulevard SPS MINIMUM YARDS (between tracts) Side The greater of 15 ft. or Y, the zoned SPS building height MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN The greater of 15 ft. or Y, the sum of the SPS STRUCTURES zoned building heights MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 ft. 35 ft. 70 ft.(l)(2) ~ MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 55 ft. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES New 2(3) 2 Existin 1 SPS MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 2,500 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE House ofWorship(6) 28,000 sq. ft. Accessory U ses(7) 40,000 sq. ft. Conditional U se(7), if approved 20,000 sq. ft. Circulati on/Maintenance/Storage 12,000 sq, ft. . PRESERVE SETBACKS 25 ft. 25 ft. See referenced notes (1) through (8) next page. Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 5 0[21 (I) (6) (7) (8) Includes the vertical distance between the finished floor elevation and the average center line elevation of abutting roads, which is estimated to be between 4 feet and 5 feet. Maximum actual height may be exceeded by up to 20 feet by non habitable building elements, singularly or in combination, such as a steeple, cupola, religious symbol or other excluded height permitted by LDC Subsection 4.02.0 I.D, 1, as may be amended. See Exhibit G for Graphic Depiction. Exclusive of mezzanines, loft areas and attic or attic storage areas. Should both Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted intensity shall be aggregated. Expansions which add square footage to any existing individual building are limited to a cumulative maximum of20% of the building's square footage as of the date ofPUD approval. A signed and sealed survey of the existing building(s) proposed for expansion and an additional exhibit prepared by and signed and sealed by a professional engineer which depicts the proposed and all prior expansions since the date of PUD approval, shall be submitted with the associated SDP A and building pcrmit applications. House of worship square footage not utilized shall be available for accessory uses, The maximum area of an individual room shall be 12,000 square feet. Listed setback is for habitable principal, conditional use and accessory structures. Setback provisions, relative to preserves, for parking lots, sidewalks and other site improvements shall be governed by applicable LDC provisions in effect at the time of SDP A application. (2) (3) (4) (5) Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 6 of21 A. Buffers 1. Perimeter landscape buffers shall be installed with the first SDP for a new permanent building or with the SDP that provides for the relocation of the lake, 2. All required buffer trees along Myrtle Road, Ridge Drive and West Street shall be shade trees. 3. The maximum water management area within the combined frontage buffers of Tracts A and B shall be 50%; and the maximum width of the water management use shall not exceed 70% of the buffer's depth. 4. The hedge component of the continuous perimeter LDC Type D landscape buffer abutting West Street, commencing south of the existing buildings depicted on the Master Plan and extending to the driveway on Myrtle Road, shall be installed with a minimum height of 5 feet, spaced 4 feet on center and grown and maintained to a height of 12 feet above grade of any adjacent berm; and a 6-foot black or green clad chain link fence shall be hidden within this double hedge row. 5. Hedges within the perimeter landscape buffer along West Street not described above shall be grown and maintained at a minimum height of 6 feet. B. Parking Lot Lighting Pole lights shall be restricted to a maximum of 16 feet in height, measured to the top of the emitting fixture, and their use shall be further restricted to interior parking lots and at ingress-egress drives. Campus lighting shall be limited to bollards, landscape and building lighting fixtures. Bollards shall have a maximum height of 48 inches. C. Existing Ingress - Egress Driveways Existing driveways will be eliminated or reconfigured, as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan, as the tracts are redeveloped. D. Open Space The project will provide and maintain a minimum of 30% of gross project area [i.e. not less than 4.8"=acres] as open space. Open space includes but is not limited to landscape buffers, interior landscaping, building foundation landscaping, dry water management areas and lakes. At the time of build-out, and thereafter, the project shall provide and maintain a minimum of 40% of the gross project area [i.e. not less than 6.3", acres] as open space. Build-out, relative to this provision, shall be the time when 80,000 square feet of structures exist within Tract A. Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 7 0[21 ,_ ,_". . _'~",._~,."_".._,,~_ e' ..~._,.~,.._",..~..,..' - E. Water Management The existing 3.3," acre borrow pit lake, which does not meet County development standards for lake cross sections, associated slopes and littoral zones, shall be reconfigured and relocated as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. The project shall provide the greater of the capacity required by water managemcnt design standards for a 3 day, 25 year storm event, or the capacity of the existing lake. Capacity may be met, in part, with dry water rnanagement areas. A no-discharge design shall be evaluated for the storm water management system which meets commercial land use standards and shall be implemented if not more costly than a conventional design and provided it does not require modification of the site plan design. Water management areas required for the existing facilities that are to remain, including those within Tract B, may be met by the facilities and capacity in Tract A. These areas of existing facilities may be located outside of the Tract ^ management containment berm provided that compensating water management areas for the acreage have been provided, Tract B shall be integrated into the master water management system if and when Tract B is redeveloped. The minimum lake setback from the CFPUD boundary, as measured at control elevation, shall be 25 feet. See fencing and associated landscape installation standards within this Ordinance. Subject to final jurisdictional agency permitting, the designed capacity of the proposed storm water management system shall at a minimum provide for the following noncumulative development standards: pretreatment of not less than the first half inch of rainfall over the project's entire impervious area, and the greater of 150% of water quality base requirement (not less than 2.5 inches over the entire project's impervious area) within dry water management areas and not less than 1.5 inches over the entire project. The balance of the project's storm water management capacity shall provide for acccptance of drainage from onc or more ahutting roadside swales via connections to the wet detention or retention system, in addition to serving as the outfall for the project's dry water management areas. Parking spaces fronting buffcr and landscape areas shall utilize the Land Development Code development standard that permits vehicular overhang to lessen the amount of pavement and therefore reduce impervious area. The plaza area located between the central campus buildings and the campus perimeter sidewalk and/or curb shall be a minimum of 50% pervious. F. Flat roof prohibition. Flat roofs may not be utilized as a primary or principal roof component. Flat roofs may be utilized for secondary roof areas when hidden from view by the use of articulated architectural elements which create and provide for an articulated roof line. G. Project Phasing. The attached Master Plan depicts the redevelopment of Tract A. It is understood that the redevelopment is likely to be realized over a nurnber of phases which will likely include the retention of one or more existing buildings and their associated improvements between phases, Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 8 of2l H. Preserve. The minimum required native vegetation for this site is 44 native trees for the previously developed portion of this site and a minimum of an additional 0.12 acres of created preserve (15% of the existing 0.8 acres of native vegetation). The location of the 44 trees is proposed to be within the perimeter landscape buffer along West Street and Myrtle Road. The site location for the created preserve is a dry water management area identified on the CFPUD Master Plan. This location is subject to jurisdictional agency review and approval. 1. Parking Space Requirements and Restrictions. The minimum parking spaces provided shall be 3 for each 7 seats within the house of worship. There shall be no additional parking requirements for the additional uses. The maximum number of vehicular parking spaces, exclusive of loading and drop-off parking areas shall be 500. Should Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted parking intensity for the combined Tracts shall be aggregated. J. Hours of Operation Restrictions: I. Child care and School: between 6:30 am and 6:30 pm, Monday through Friday; for operational hours. Normal operational hours may be exceeded up to 4 times per month for accommodation of special functions. 2. Adult care: between 6:30 am and 8:30 pm. 3, Non worship use of the facilities: between 7:30 am and 10:30 pm. Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 9 of21 '''" '",'-<"-.~~"~'~"'-'~',"'<-"',~"'..~'~""'-" .'. - TABLE 1 (for Tract B) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (for Tract B) Table I, together with the text which follows below, sets forth the development standards for land uses within Tract B of this CFPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP). The redevelopment program of this CFPUD is based on a 25 year build-out. MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM YARDS I i-cr PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY AND CONDITIONAL USES -~-_._-- . 1 .9ct acres N/A -,-"- -.. --....- .-.- 236 ft. N/A _.._-----~-_._.- he greater of30 It. or the zoned height SPS of structure -.,,--.-- u. .. .. - .'.-.---- -- The greater of 15 ft. or Y, the zoned SPS building height ,___.__. __________m. hc greater of 15ft. or Y, the sum of the SPS zoned building heights .- . - ... 35 ft.(J)(2) ... 35 ft. - --." --55 ft(ITO), .-- ,. 55 ftO) 2(3) 2 .. '._.'..- ..'. 2,500 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. ---~ ---' ----- -.-.. 5,600 sq. ft. 12,400 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft. -.-.---... " ,....... (from right of way) - MINIMUM YARDS (between tracts) Side MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN T STRUCTURES MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES MINIMUM FLOOR AREA MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOT AGE House of Worship(5) Accessory Uses and any approved Conditional Use (6) Circulati on/Maintenance/Storage See referenced notes (1) through (6) next page. Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 10 of21 (1) (6) Includes the vertical distance between the finished floor elevation and the average center line elevation of abutting roads, which is estimated to be between 4 feet and 5 feet. Maximum actual height may be exceeded by up to 20 feet by non habitable building elements, singularly or in combination, such as a steeple, cupola, religious symbol or other excluded height permitted by LDC Subsection 4.02.01.D.l, as may be amended. Exclusive of mezzanines, loft areas and attic or attic storage areas, Should both Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted intensity shall be aggregated. House of worship square footage not utilized shall be available for accessory uses. An increase in the allocated house of worship square footage shall require approval ofa Conditional Use petition. The maximum square footage of any individual room shall be less than the square footage of the house of worship. (2) (3) (4) (5) Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 11 of21 ....,.......~,.__._---,~<., - .. '~,...,..-..,..~.,~~~.;.,--~~~ " ". '-, ""....~._, .. A. Buffers 1. Except as otherwise required or provided herein, perimeter buffers shall be installed concurrently with the redevelopment improvements in their proximity. 2. All required buffer trees along Ridge Drive and West Street shall be shade trees. 3. Hedges within perimeter landscapc buffers along West Street and Ridge Drive shall be grown and maintained to a minimum height of 4 feet; and, to a height of 5 fect when not abutting a vehicular parking lot. 4. There shall be no surfacc water management use within the perimeter buffers. B. Parking Lot Lighting Pole lights are restricted to a maximum height of 16 feet, measured to the top of the emitting fixture, and their use is further restricted to interior parking lots and to rneeting arterial level requirements at ingress- egress drives. Bollards shall havc a maximum height of 48 inches. C. Existing Ingress .- Egress Driveways Existing driveways shall be eliminatcd or reconfigured, as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan, as the site is redeveloped. The two restricted one-way access driveways serving Tract B shall be removed with the displacement of the existing buildings. Thereafter, the ingress-egress to the Tract will be via shared driveways located within Tract A. D. Open Space The project shall provide and maintain a minimum of 30% of gross project area [i.e. not less than 4,8ctacres] as open space. Open space includes but is not limited to landscape buffers, interior landscaping, building foundation landscaping, dry water management areas and lakes. At the time of build-out, and thereafter, the project shall provide and maintain a minimum of 40% of the gross project area [i.e. not less than 6.H acres] as open space. Build-out, relative to this provision, shall be the time when 80,000 square feet of structurcs cxist within Tract A. Tract B shall include butTers that meet the LDC landscape requirements for buffers, interior landscaping and building foundation planting areas. These and any other landscaped and open space areas shall contribute to the overall open space requirement of the CFPUD. The minimum open space requirement for Tract B and its associated contribution toward meeting the gross CFPUD minimum open space requirement shall be 20% ofthe gross area of Tract B. Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 12 of21 E. Water Management The existing 3.Jt acre borrow pit lake, which does not meet County development standards for lake cross sections, associated slopes and littoral zones, shall be reconfigured and relocated as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. The project shall provide the greater of the capacity required by water management design standards for a 3 day, 25 year storm event, or the capacity of the existing lake. Capacity may be met, in part, with dry water management areas, A no-discharge design shall be evaluated for the storm water management system which meets commercial land use standards and shall be implemented if not more costly than a conventional design and provided it does not require modification of the site plan design. Water management areas required for the existing facilities that are to remain, including those within Tract B, may be met by the facilities and capacity in Tract A. These areas of existing facilities may be located outside of the Tract A management containment berm provided that compensating water management areas for the acreage have been provided. Tract B shall be integrated into the master water management system if and when Tract B is redeveloped. Subject to final jurisdictional agency permitting, the designed capacity of the proposed storm water management system shall at a minimum provide for the following noncumulative development standards: pretreatment of not less than the first half inch of rainfall over the project's entire impervious , area, and the greater of 150% of water quality base requirement (not less than 2.5 inches over the entire project's impervious area) within dry water management areas and not less than 1.5 inches over the entire project. The balance of the project's stormwater management capacity shall provide for acceptance of drainage from one or more abutting roadside swales via connections to the wet detention or retention system, in addition to serving as the outfall for the project's dry water management areas. Parking spaces fronting buffer and landscape areas shall utilize the Land Development Code development standard that permits vehicular overhang to lessen the amount of pavement and therefore reduce impervious area. F. Flat roof prohibition. Flat roofs may not be utilized as a primary or principal roof component. Flat roofs may be utilized for secondary roof areas when hidden from view by the use of articulated architectural elements which create and provide for an articulated roofline. G. Project Phasing. It is understood that the redevelopment may be realized over a number of phases and may include the retention of the existing buildings and associated improvements between phases, H. Parking Space Requirements and Restrictions. The minimum parking spaces provided shall be 3 for each 7 seats within the house of worship. There shall be no additional parking requirements for the additional uses. The maximum number of vehicular parking spaces, exclusive of loading and drop-off parking areas shall be 100. Should both Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted parking intensity of the combined Tracts shall be aggregated. Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 13 of21 - --""'-'-'~._'~~-'--'-~-'-- . ,,' ,,"_, _'.n.",_',"~_.""~,.___.,"",,,~~,... .,~_, --^,--,._-- 1. Hours of Operation Restrictions: I. Child care and School: between 6:30 am and 6:30 pm, Monday through Friday; for operational hours. Normal operational hours may be cxcceded up to 4 times per month for accomrnodation of special functions. 2. Adult care: between 6:30 am and 8:30 pm, 3, Non worship use of the facilities: between 7:30 am and 10:30 pm. Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 140[21 ~I _:=J =.1I (f:1 , ' 8111 >-8, . ' ~~ i II I . " w,..., . . ...J<D f~ ~ III N. '~II , , , ' I 1:1 , "- 'ro' I I~I ,~, )- 811~1 -' o. ,-. --. "0 I "'- ""m a:",,~ t~:I' II :s ,. z '- " 0 "1 ~I . .L..' _J PII -"oiiidJ I' "''''':\ 5 -ll.i '" , '41' oll~1 o )- 0, . . ~:O! '" ~~ ~ III . , d41111 '"0 ",.-' . .- '~ 111I , ,- 111I ,- , II . . <- > 81 I Vi~ ' ~=::' o' . . ~"t:l III I;:;'" III ~~~IIII~~ "" . ..-'t-. - iii r~: I I I~ eo; z ~ " ~ c. . . ~ 1111 .~ ~I;:'I' -~ I I Exhibit C IllOoooevazLS:ONClfOJ jf:OOOt-lllrlllL9"'NO"CJI <;OOOllllVIlZLs:oNOnOJLJ J"lII"lVJ 3~NIS:8sn J.11~'9'J 3~Nls:nn ),111"1'0'; ]1:)Nls;un .' I-JS/J ;f",!,-",z . l-jSIJ :!lU!'"'' ' I-JSIJ :6u!uoz . 1 L_,_ .--.I___I___.--.J "-- . - . - , - , - . --. -.=JIl;o.rell:!FuJ .. I u 'r-.-'-'., ,,-, j ["tlc . . I I,g E I I m III 1u..!,I;;0) l~ di ~ m IN 1-0 E 1II IN j Ql ; l.n \ 0. ~ I I ~ iG L.~.~ '" ,. ~."t:l ;> c.... l::(:' ~,!I:I"O ..J - <( 0:: I- g- <( :;: <( - - ~ I- :;: c ~ ~ <( , () . ,- ~ I- ro - - 0 ~ <( , 0 , o 0 :I: e ~ . 0:: l- I- 0:: 0 Z ~ g .,. (/) ::J , ro _ , o ~ o > 0 i::'~ ro , E 0 " ~o ~ C ~ , . ~ r - . m I- o BU!~Jed ~] I- 1-1_1_1 I_I ~....n.a'.'L'U" .. "- . -, -, - '~a7iIJ 'Gllp, ~0;"""~90'O".' 1 ;000";'''9'' 0',., I,o~oo",:,r., .;,.;,11 (1 ),111"l'9'J ]l~N1s:un .l,lIW....; ]l~MS;~sn ),,111"111'.> ]~NIS'3sn l-~S~ :5u!uoz l-JSlJ :!'>U!UOZ l~JS~ :!'>"!UOZ ~i:' .~ ~~ , ro 0 . 00- o c ro ~.. C~ . C - . - C . E. . . ~, . ro c . E iill -"'-'--' ~-._~-. ,-.. --~'--~'-'~"-~---""-""'-;""",-<._",,-,,,...~."~,,-- llli::j! II ,'I'l/"!i II I i !,P 1,1 I 'I I Ii' ;~,J@llI '~I lil ~i "."'il ' '" , . ,""' llUi'il! h ,I ! " i i I '."! I. <I" . ! ,.' , i'I"' I! Ii ' , "-H!.h!l '!'i I ! g I' 1!l,.Il! i! ' , !!!~ ,: II iIlilm!! Ii i ~"I; i ;,.,.1I' l' I ~ i~~~i~~~ ~i ~~~!o~~I€E~ _ ~~ ~~i ~ Ho >-l/ ~a " ~ S~"M ::;u ,., ! ~~;~i~!~ ~~ ~~~~~"~i~1 ~~ !~ ~ ~~~~~hl!~Ut~ ~ _~~~~~d ~~ ~l;~ ~ , . . I . , , ., . i . . . . , , . ij ~, " " '. " _J~ - S i:'~ ! -, ," I e'j 0 I, . . . . ", , . , . .' , , 0'. , " . , , 0 i! t;~ , i , ! . , -'1 , . . . '. , . . - ,. . , , 1<J<J t1l ". " '. , . ~ '.a.", 0 t~"" , ... ,.- -." 0 ~.'!!.,; E """'0 . " " "1 ., a. ~ _ u ".,Ii "- !' I! 0 ~ ~ ",..r;> () a. ~;:l; ~ ,. ! z ~ - - ., . ,.. u:)c ' < 0 I I '" ';20; '. , I-o..~ <( ;:.. '"'" . g~-" - - o,g,g> -w. I I ~~ "'c J:I-I .. .. ~ ~ '-- .. - ~ xU)o ..""'- w"'. z ,,~_ a. :<M . - - s-=! " (:lJ ., u&.... ~ . . . > .. .. . ~ ~ . .s 0 ~ .. _ <> L ~ ~ , ,,""" c - . .._0.. 0 """'10 ~ ....s " . . ,., E , . . -. . "1:", . e ,- . . ~ .- . , b . " . . - , 0 . . 0 , , . 2 " N . , > . ~ . " ~ . ~ 0 0 , 0 , , , " .1 ,. - . !ii~,,~ . , "' ". "- , , , . : ~~~ ~ !t:~ ill ;';11 !Ii ,5' 1" H! III ;i~~ ~ f~~ i ~ n ~1~ ..<~ t~ ~[~ ;~~ ~~ p~ i,l '! ,II ~n i~ ~~~ ~r/; !I,.. d;r ~~! E~ ~H h~ ~~ i;1 ~~~ ~~ ih ~~~ ~~ ~~g li' " "I ..w:i;,a ," H~ ~~ 5~ .,. . . . . .. --. . .. . ., , e . . ,l ! iii! P ~ ~: ah2 i~ u':1 8" ~d~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I;i~~ii ~ " i! ,.!,,~l , .. lll,,- ':e'I"!'1 n ~~~~jt. ~~ ~~5i" l' (~:: ~~ ~:u~~.. i >-1 '"- EXHIBITD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (TRACT A) FOLIO NUMBERS: 67285160009,67285280002,67285360003,67285320001 LOTS 1-7 AND 10-13, BLOCK "0", PINE RIDGE EXTENSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 51, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (TRACT B) -----, ._----,-- ._-----. FOLIO 67285400002 LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 0, PINE RIDGE EXTENSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 16 of21 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC (TRACT A) I. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02,A. Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements which requires sidewalks within road right-of-way; except that sidewalks shall be provided along Trail Boulevard and along that portion of Myrtle Road between Trail Boulevard and the project ingress-egress driveway to Myrtle Road. In lieu of providing the sidewalks along the balance of the abutting right-of- way, the property owner shall install a parallel row of royal palms on the west side of Trail Boulevard to match the proposed royal palms within the required landscape buffer fronting Trail Boulevard. The developer shall also construct one sidewalk extension fi'om the central building campus across Trail Boulevard to the pavement along US 4] to provide access to an existing bus stop, as conceptually depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan, 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.05.N. which requires naturalization of man made lakes and water management areas through the use of curvilinear edges; to permit accomplishment of the intent through the use of a curvilinear landscape installation instead of a curvilinear physical contour. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06,05,D,2.a. which provides that no more than 30% of the canopy trees may be substituted by palms within an individual Type D Buffer to permit up to lOO% utilization of palms along Trail Boulevard provided that the percentage of palms does not exceed 30% of the required perimeter buffer trees for Tracts A and B; and, that the palms utilized are Royal Palms; and, that all required buffer trees along Myrtle Road, West Street and Ridge Drive shall be canopy/ shade trees, 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 5,05.08.E.2,c. Minimum ratios. Pedestrian pathway connections must be provided frorn the building to adjacent road pathways at a ratio of one for each vehicular entrance to a project. Drive aisles leading to main entrances must have at least a walkway on one side of the drive isle; to permit a reduction to a maximum of five: two (2) to Trail Boulevard, one (I) to Myrtle Road, one (I) to Ridge Drive and one (I) to West Street; all as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan, 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.A to eliminate the required buffer between Tracts A and B; provided that the equivalent square footage of the 10 foot wide buffer, for that length not provided, and the associated tree requirement of 1 tree per 30 linear feet, is located elsewhere within the Tract. Should the entire CFPUD acreage be submitted for permitting as a single SDP, the buffer would not be required and therefore this dcviation request would not be applicable. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Subsections 5.03.02.E,2, and 5.03.02.E.4. to eliminate the requirement for a nonresidential development located opposite a residentially zoned district to provide a four (4') foot masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall located a rninimum of three (3) feet from the rear of the right-of-way landscape buffer line. Document Date: October 14,2008 Pagel7of2! ",,~--"~--'._..~~._~_.- (TRACT B) 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A. Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements which require sidewalks within abutting rights-of-way. The property owner shall make a payrnent in-lieu of providing sidewalk segments which would otherwise be required. 2, Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4,06,02.A to eliminate the required buffer between Tracts A and B; provided that the equivalent square footage of the 10 foot wide buffer, for that length not provided, and the associated tree requirement of 1 tree per 30 linear feet, is located elsewhere within the Tract. Should the entire CFPUD acreage be subrnitted for permitting as a single SDP, the buffer would not be required and therefore this deviation request would not be applicable. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Subsections 5,03.02.E,2. and 5.03,02.E.4. to eliminate the requirement for a nonresidential development located opposite a residentially zoned district to provide a four (4') foot masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall located a minimum of three (3) feet from the rear of the right-of-way landscape buffer line. Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 18 of2l EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS (TRACT A) 1. The initial redevelopment SDP for Tract A shall include: a. the replacement of the existing lake with a new lake(s) and associated dry water management areas; b. the redevelopment of landscape buffers abutting the lake( s) and associated dry water management areas; c. the re-grading of the right-of-way green space between the CFPUD boundary and edge of pavement of the four adjacent roadways to enhance storm water management for these roadway areas , 2. The minimum throat length as measured from the roadway edge of payment to the internal parking area shall be 50 feet for driveways from Myrtle Road, West Street and Ridge Drive; and, 75 feet for driveways from Trail Boulevard. 3. The Church shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider for services and other periods and cvents of significant traffic generation, at location(s) to be determined and to be based on need; subject to the approval of the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. 4, The Ridge Drive primary egress driveway will be restricted to a "no right turn" condition. The Myrtle Road egress driveway will be restrictcd and signed to a "no left turn" condition. 5. A south bound turn lane on Ridge Drive, extending from the egress driveway to US 41, shall be constructed concurrently by the property owner with the initial redevelopment phase of development. 6. The seating capacity of the House of Worship shall be limited to 780 seats (980 for the entire CFPUD), and the total number of students/individuals eillolled in Child/Adult Day Care / Pre- KlKindergarten / School, limited to 1st through 3rd, within Tract A shall be limited to 60 persons (110 for the entire CFPUD), until US 41 turn lanes serving the site are extended to meet design standards; or a traffic study, based in part on actual traffic counts, is provided to and confirmed by the County, demonstrating that the existing turn lanes are adequate. The traffic counts for this traffic study will be taken during the first quarter of a calendar year to more accurately portray peak season loading. At the time of the study, supplemental traffic counts will be taken to determine the trips originating or leaving the CFPUD through the neighborhood. This supplemental data will be utilized by the County to determine if additional improvements to minimize impact to the neighborhood are appropriate and should be required as a condition of approval for the additional seating capacity of 220 and/or the additional 110 students/individuals. Document Date: October 14, 2008 Page 19 of21 ,"H ,,','''.'' _"",_~~,,''''''_,.__',' ,._<.,",.' " . (TRACT B) 1. The Church shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider for services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, at location(s) to be determined and to be based on need; subject to the approval of the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. 2. A payment-in-Jieu-of contribution shall be made by the property owner to the County for otherwise required sidewalks within abutting right-of-way to Tract B prior to issuance of the first Site Development Plan or Site Development Plan Amendment, as may be applicable, subsequent to the approval of this CFPUD. J Document Date: October 14,2008 Page 20 0[21 ROOF LINE Exhibit G 1 '" ADDITIONAL HEIGHT '" - MID POINT OF ROOF ~l 0(}1 I'" 2J ADJACENT AVERAGE CENTERLINE ROAD ELEVA llON &:\ ~ 0' "_,h".O>"_'__~.'__k_.'_'~' ' GRAPHIC EXAMPLE OF TRACT A - MAXIMUMS DEPICTED document date: october 1, 20081 site graphic prepared by: planning development incorporated: engineers, planners and landscape architects 5133 castello drive suite 21 naples, f10rida 34103/239.263.6934 mfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com , ',-" .,-.~-,._.._,,-", P" ..._~.>~ - .--,..,<..-.' " o -1 C ...." or . I r'l G) I -1 EXHIBIT H CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL October 7, 2008 1, Any plan subrnitted pursuant to this CFPUD shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Master Plan entitled "Exhibit C Master Plan," prepared by Planning Development Incorporated, consisting of one sheet, dated August 27, 2008, except as conditioned. 2. Any submitted site development plan (SDP) proposing the expansion of an existing building shall be accompanied by a survcy depicting the actual square footage of the building and shall demonstrate that the proposed expansion will not exceed a 20 percent increase in the building's size. 3. The access points located on West Street and Ridge Drive, depicted on Tract B of the Master Plan, shall close when this tract redevelops. 4. The submitted SDP shall identify the preserve area setback rcquirements. 5, At the time of SDP, the applicant shalIprovide a FLUCFCS map for the vegetated areas and shall provide a tree count for thc other vegetated areas, such as the pines around the existing lake. 6. The required re-created preserve shall meet County preserve requirements and shall recreate the habitat that previously existed on-site (pine flatwoods) and re-create all three strata; shall not be located in an area requiring ongoing understory clearance or periodic maintenance for water management; and shall not be located within water management areas that are being used for watcr qual ity treatment. 7, The folJowing last two sentences of the Preserve Note on the Master Plan shall be deleted: "The created preserve shall be located north of the proposed lake in the general area identified on the CFPUD master plan. The (CP) may be located within a dry water management area provided no water quality is provided within the created preserve." In addition, in Section II of the CFPUD document, the following language shall be deleted: "The site location for thc created preserve is a dry water management area identified on the CFPUD master plan. This location is subject to jurisdictional agency review and approval." 8. The planting plan shall not be part of the rezone packagc and will bc reviewed at the time ofSDP. 9. The property owners shall providc, or shall pay the County to provide, a bus shelter at the existing Collier Area Transit stop locatcd adjacent to US 41, which is located at the stub-out in the median separating Trail Boulevard and US 41 as depicted on the Master Plan, If the property owners choose to build the bus shelter, then this shelter shall be constructed as part of the first development order. 10. In lieu of providing sidewalks around the perimeter of the site, the property owners shall provide a sidewalk link frorn Ridge Drive northward to Sand Pine Drive, to connect the site to the existing commercial uses located north of it. If the BCC determines that this request is not in the best interest of the community, then by default the property owners shall be required to comply with the LDC by providing payment in lieu for all sidewalks along the site's multiple frontages. u'. "_~__~'M._,__~_" ..." .-,___..'"._"_H',__.~."'~.._,_'_ CRAJ~ R. WOODWARD MARK J. WCX)DWAKD ANTHONY P. PIRES. JR. J. CHRISTOPHER loMBARDO STEVEN V BlOUNT CARRIE E. L\OEM....N CARLO F. ZAMI'OGNA JENNIFER L. DEVRIES JENNIFER M. TENNEY (80ardurtific:dRc:alE:i[ale Attorney) (Boan! Cenifie<d City. Counly :rnd Loc.al Government Attorney) 3200 Tamiami Trail N. Suire 200 Naples, FL 34103 TEL (239)649,6555 FAX (239)649-7342 www.wpi-legal.com .ll.. '-";'-'-:~r ~ -::j.1~Af- ~);~; .. -- t' WOODWARD, PIRES & LOMBARDO, FA. Attorneys-At-Law January 12, 2009 TO: Collier County Planning Commissioners RE: Heavenly CFPUD; AR-12097 This law firm represents the Pine Ridge Civic Association, Inc. ["Pine Ridge Association"] with regards to the current Application/Petition and the proposed PUD document associated with AR-10297, scheduled to be considered by the Planning Commission at its January 15, 2009 meeting. The Pine Ridge Association has attempted to work with the Applicant(s) in order to try to accommodate the Applicant(s) redevelopment desires while at the same time protecting the integrity of the character of the Pine Ridge community. The Pine Ridge community is a well established [over 50 years], primarily low density, single family community. While it is correct that the subject property has been used for religious purposes and associated community purposes for quite a while, the Application proposes to substantially increase the intensity and scope of the uses and structures. The Pine Ridge Association is concerned as to whether this proposed increase and change will be incompatible with the Pine Ridge community and not be complementary to the surrounding land uses in the Pine Ridge community, as required by Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. The Applicant(s) have apparently decided to utilize the PUD process as opposed to the Conditional Use process in order to provide greater flexibility to the Applicant in the future as to the placement of structures and uses. This flexibility for the Applicant creates uncertainty for the Pine Ridge Association and the Pine Ridge community. Thus, at the outset, the Pine Ridge Association, consistent with its previous correspondence and position has a fundamental objection to the process by which the Applicant(s) propose to obtain the "base approval" to begin intensifying the uses on their property. The Pine Ridge Association objects to rezoning the property to a PUD as opposed to the Applicant(s) requesting incremental, as needed, Conditional Use approval( s) for various individual new uses and expansion of existing uses. Such Conditional Use applications should be made closer to the time that the Applicant(s) will actually be capable of beginning expansion or redevelopment, and have detailed plans therefor. - 1 - While maintaining the foregoing core objection to the pending PUD rezoning application, if the CCPC is inclined to believe that the proposed CFPUD is the proper land use regulation "vehicle", the Pine Ridge Association has a number of other reasons why this Petition should be recommended for denial, in its current iteration, and if not denied, suggests the following changes: 1. at page 4 of 22, Tract B Permitted Uses, should be "House" not "Houses" of worship. 2. in the list of uses for both Tracts the Petitioner should detail the proposed "accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses" in order to provide the Pine Ridge Community with a level of comfort as to the certainty of uses in order to fully comprehend and gauge the PUD's impacts. The Pine Ridge Association appreciates the prohibition against "Business and Trade activities", but believes that does not afford adequate protection against currently unarticulated uses that may be attempted in the future to be characterized as "accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses". 3. at page 6 of 22, in Note (2), the maximum height should be 20 feet and not 30 feet. 4. at page 7 of 22, in Paragraph 4: (a.) the first three lines should read: "The hedge component of the continuous perimeter LDC Type 0 landscape buffer abutting West Street and Myrtle Road (ex1ending to the driveway on Myrtle Road) shall be...". (b.) the word "at" at the beginning of (b), (c) and (d) should be deleted and replaced with "Along". (c.) the word "minimum" should be inserted before each of the listed heights. 5. at page 8 of 22 in 8b. [should be (b) for consistency], the words "Covenant Church" should be deleted and the words "The developer/owner" should be inserted in the second line; and the word "Church's" should be deleted in the fourth line. 6. at page 8 of 22 the last sentence of the first full paragraph in "E" should read as follows [as opposed to what is in the proposed PUD]: The project shall provide the greater of: 1. the capacity required by water management design standards for a 3 day, 25 year storm event; 2., or the capacity of the existing lake; or 3. the capacity required by water management design standards at the time that development order approval is sought.. Capacity may be met, in part, with dry water management areas. This same change should also occur to the last sentence of the first full paragraph in "E" at page 14 of 22. Additionally, any application for any activity associated with the "relocation" of the existing lake should be accompanied by a detailed study assessing the impacts of such proposed activities on the potable drinking wells in Pine Ridge within a 2,000 foot radius. 7. at page 8 of 22 the word "Estates" should be deleted in the phrase "Pine Ridge Estates" 8. at page 20 of 22, the following should be added: The property owner(s), will take annual traffic counts at Carica Road and Goodlette-Frank Road, and at Center Street and Goodlette-Frank Road, during the first quarter of each calendar year. This data will be utilized by the County to determine if additional measures to minimize impact to the residential Pine Ridge neighborhood are appropriate and should be required to address the uses within the CFPUD. After reviewing such data, the County has the right, power and authority to require the property owner(s) within the CFPUD to implement measures to minimize impact to the residential Pine Ridge community. 9 in the Tract "B" regulations, there should be language prohibiting outdoor music; requiring that when there is music associated with any activities, that the music cannot ex1end past 9:00 p.m.; and, that music only be performed and confined to a fully enclosed building with all of the windows and doors closed, so that it cannot be heard from outside the building. 10. the documents should clearly state that only those proposed structures depicted on the Master Plan can be constructed, and that an amendment to the PUD and the Master Plan will be required if any other structures are desired to be constructed. There may also be additional issues and possibly materials raised or presented at the hearing not only by the Pine Ridge Association, but other residents within the Pine Ridge community, We appreciate your consideration of my clients' concerns and issues with this pending rezoning petition. Enclosure(s) - 3- -----_._~,....._,-- - l ~"- :11 .Il. ,j': .' !'~;;~. iZj " ,t;;~.~~~D;-II"?: .:C:;'7"h~~'~rXII if. >"/, ,-,,,.-17 "f"'t:~+"f',o.ool. 1- "'~ ",4!\.J! ~ \.~rbttt ~r.I'1'Rd" I, " j,.'~' i"".""'~:>--'''- Ce,' ;::""'Jl~"'" ), ",~t;' ,_ J ~ i.L _!.!}.~il:\ M'UJC ~~:.~_. Ii' -~~~;:. T# ,; -$"""y.-$'~~: C~;~V, ' I' I ,-~:.~. '" il $ ') , :'Ji -1r" ....' HEAVENLY COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) EXHmITS A through G I Document Date: 98to1l8. 11, J.nuarv 9. 2009 Page 1 of22 HEAVENLY COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) EXHIBIT A GENERAL: Development of the Heavenly CFPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections and parts of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. (TRACT A) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure. or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used. in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: I. HeHseA hous~ of worship with a maximum seating capacity of 1,000 individuals. B. Accessory Uses: I. Religious Educational Classrooms and Chorus Rehearsal Room 2. SociallMeeting and Activity Center 3. Administrative Offices 4. Child! Adult Day Care I Pre- K1Kindergarten / School, limited to I st through 3rd; with no more than a combined cumulative total of 220 students/individuals enrolled/attending for the entire CFPUD. The allocation to Tract A shall be 170, but may be realleeated increased by mutual agreement of the Tract A and B owners [if in different ownership] provided the total number of students/individuals for the entire CFPUD does not exceed 220. 5. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures; except that parking garages are prohibited. Business and Trade activities. includine but not limited to. a "Market". "Communi tv Market". direct marketine outlet or "Farmers Market". are not accessory uses associated with the oermitted orincioal uses and structures. C.CeRditisRaI Uses: I.ChilElMdelt Day Cllfe ! Pre K!J(,iRlIergarteR I Selleel, limited te 1" tllf8l1gR 3"'t-fef eflfellfReattserdeg fReTe t-Hae a eyfffttla~i~/e total af 229 5t1:uieRtsli88b'iElullls fer tRe entire CfPUD. The SflHaFe feetags af aay 8fJIJrs.,e8. eSRaitiasal use BRei] Be iRehuilea -;:ithi9 me fRaKiRU1Rl aeeesse~' Iise s€j1::lafe feetage af 72J)OO SEJ1:Ulfe feet ~.vitBi8 TF8et }., and 1ft ae 8';SRt sRall the SEJlIllfe festage af all tRe streetllFeS ';;itRiR the eARre CFPUD eneeetll00,QOO SEJIIIlFe Feet; eKeeflt BS "FAa:,' 88 QfJ]3rs\'eEl ill item C.2 bel()"l/. Docwnent Date: 001011..11, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 2 of 22 2. Uj:) 188ft Qaai1isaal 2Q,QQQ St}HaFe feet sf aeeess8F)" HSe( 6 ). IM:. Temporary Uses: 1. Temporary building structures may be utilized to accommodate existing uses in the initial redevelopment construction transition period. Such uses shall not begin until after the orooertv owner aoolies for a buildine oermic for the first new oermanent building and +!he maximum period of use of such temporary building(s) shall be for a oeriod of ~ 27 months, BY1 iR Be 6":eR1 SHall Be li1ilie8Ei BeyeaEl 9Q days after r:eeei1l1 sf the eeftifisat0 elf eeeY~aRe~' after the buildine oermit is issued for the first new permanent building. Any such building(s) shall meet CFPUD setbacks requirements for new structures. I Document Date: Dntall.. 11, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 3 of 22 (TRACT B) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used. in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. House(s) of worship with a maximum seating capacity of 200 individuals. B. Accessory Uses: I. Religious Educational Classrooms and Chorus Rehearsal Room 2. SociallMeeting and Activity Center 3. Administrative Offices 4. Child! Adult Day Care / Pre-K1Kindergarten / School, limited to 1 Sl through 3rd; with no more than a combined cumulative total of 220 students/individuals enrolled for the entire CFPUD. The allocation to Tract B shall be 50, but may be reallocated to Tract A by mutual agreement of the Tract A and B owners [if under different ownership] provided the total number of students/individuals for the entire CFPUD does not exceed 220. 5. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures; excepl that parking garages are prohibited. Business and Trade activities, includine but not limited to. a "Market". "Communitv Market". direct marketine outlet or "Farmers Market", are not accessorv uses associated with the permitted orincioal uses and structures. C.CeHsitiaRal Uses: l.Ckih:ll:\Ehdt Day Cafe I Pf8 KlKiHderg9.fteA .' Sekael, limited to 151 through 3F4t-fef eRfel1fft8Rttsef\'iflg mor.e theft a SHAUlls!i,,@! t8~1 ef 229 styaeRtslieai\'itIHals ~r tile 8Rtif8 CFPUD. The sf:}Hare t'eatage sf aay 9fJIU8\'ea seRelitie8al tiEe SHall Be iaslueleel '!::ithia ~e fflaximHFll aeeessary liSt!! BflH8Fe restage Elf 11.400 sEfl:1are feet widlie Traet R, aaa in He evest shall tRe sElHar>€! resta.ge of all Ute structtlres witkia the 8atir=e CFPUD 0KseeE.l IOO,9QG 6f:}HBfe feet; eX88fJt 8S may 138 a}3~re\'eEl as a CSRditi0f1al Use fer Tfaet }... 2.L^,,8 iRerease i8 maniHltJRl seatiag 6BfJRe4ty. Ffl&Kiffll::UB fJ8F1dHg 6fJaees &RS/ef maniFRwm B~l:Iare f~etage alloeatieR far the keyse(s) of w8FSl=lip. I Document Date: 081011..11, January 9. 2009 Page 4 of 22 EXHffiIT B TABLE I (for Tract A) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (for Tract A) Table I, together with the text which follows below, sets forth the development standards for land uses within Tract A of this CFPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP). +!Ie redevelef)fReHt J'lfegram ef tRia CfPUD is Baaed eR a 2S year "mild ellt. PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY AND CONDITIONAl. YSES MINIMUM LOT AREA 14:1: acres N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 538 ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS (from right-of- way line abuttinl!" the nrooertv) Existing The greater of 30 ft. or the zoned height SPS of structure Expanded buildings(5) 50 ft. for expanded portion SPS New structures 200 ft.; except, 50 ft. from Trail Boulevard SPS MINIMUM YARDS (between tracts) I Side TIle greater ef IS ft. 30 ft. er !" !he zeHed SPS . . "_L MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN The greater of 15 ft. or Y2 the sum of the SPS STRUCTURES zoned buildine heights MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT ~35 ft. 35 ft. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT ~ 50 ft.(l)(2) 5QS-ftYJ MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES New 2'3) 2 I Existin"'Exnan,lpij 1 SPS MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 2,500 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE"T House ofWorship(6) 28,000 sq. ft. Accessory U ses(7)l2.l 40,000 sq. ft. C€lR~itioRal Use~, if Rf'flflr:eel 2Q,QQQ slI. ft. CirculationIMaintenancelStorage 12,000 sq. ft. PRESERVESETBACKS~ 25 ft. 25 ft. See referenced notes (1) through (2S) next page. Document Date: OeteBer 11, Januarv 9.2009 Page 5 of 22 (1) Includes the vertical distance between the finished floor elevation and the average center line elevation of abutting roads, which is estimated to be between 4 feet and 5 feet. Maximum actual height may be exceeded by up to ~J.O feet by non habitable building elements, singularly or in combination, such as a steeple, cupola, religious symbol or other excluded height permitted by LDC Subsection 4.02.01.D.l, as may be amended. The maximum combined square footal!e of such buildine elements shall be 4.000 so. See Exhibit G for Graohic Depiction of vertical elevation measurement.~ Exclusive of mezzanines, loft areas and attic or attic storage areas. Should both Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted intensity shall be aggregated. orovided that in no event shall the square footaee of all structures within the boundaries of the CFPUD exceed 100.000 square feet. Expansions which add square footage to any existing individual building are limited to a cumulative maximum of 20% of the building's square footage as of the date of PUD approval. A signed and sealed survey of the existing building(s) proposed for expansion and an additional exhibit prepared by and signed and sealed by a professional engineer which depicts the proposed and all prior expansions since the date of PUD approval, shall be submitted with the associated . SDPA and building permit applications. House of worship square footage not utilized shall be available for accessory uses. The maximum area of an individual room shall be 12,000 square feet. Listed setback is for all 1l1l11itllllle principal. eeRditisRal IiS8 and accessory structures. Selback provisions, relative to preserves, for parking lots, sidewalks and other site improvements shall be governed by applicable LDC provisions in effect at the time of SDPA application. The Child!Adult Day CarelPre-K1Kinderl!artenlSchool use shall be located a minimum of 200 feet from West Street. Ridl!e Drive and MYrtle Road. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) rn (8) (9) I Document Date: OOlobe. 11, Januarv 9.2009 Page 6 of 22 A. Buffers I. PeRlReler All oerimeter landscape buffers shall be installed with the first SDP for a new permanent building or with the SDP that provides for the relocation of the lake. 2. All required buffer trees along Myrtle Road, Ridge Drive and West Street shall be sRalia tf811S. Quercus virlliniana. orovided in 65 Gallon containers 14' heieht and are to be Florida #1 or Florida Fancy. Street trees are to be olanted on 30' center. Quercus virlliniana is to be olanted a minimum of 10' from the center line of the reauired olantinll bed towards the adiacent ROWand is soecificallv not to be planted within the reouired 6' wide shrub olantinl! bed soecified below. Trail Blvd. buffer trees shall be Rovstonia rellia (Rova1 Palms) as provided for in deviation #3. 3. The maximum water management area within the combined frontage buffers of Tracts A and B shall be 50%; and the maximum width of the water management use shall not exceed 70% of the buffer's depth. 4U!1The hedge component of the continuous perimeter LDC Type D landscape buffer abutting West Street, eefRHl8aeiFIg seatA sf t1=l8 e1dstiRg hyileiags Eleflietea 08 me ~4a&ter Plaa and extending to the driveway on Myrtle Road, shall be installed with a minimum height of 5 feet, spaced 4 feet on center and grown and maintained to a height of 12 feet above grade of any adjacent berm; and a 6 foot black or green clad chain link fence shall be hidden within this double hedge row. The hedge row shall be one of the followine soecies: Clusia lIuttifera. Ficus beniamina 'Winterllreen '. Podocarvus SOD. 'Maid', Dr. With the approval of the Pine Ridee Architectural Review Board, a suitable s~cies with the abilitv to remain uniform in a chaneine insolation environment mav be substituted. (b). At West Street the hedee shall be maintained at 12' exceot that oortion abuttine Tract B which shall be maintained at 6' . (c). At Ridee Drive and Mvn1e Road the hedl!e shall be maintained at 6' heil!ht exceot for that oortion adiacent to MYrtle Road described above which shall be maintained at 12' in heieht. Cd). At Trail Blvd. the hedlles shall be 2' heillht at time of olantinll and maintained at 3' heillht. 4.Wec4ges "..;imiR tHe JleflfReter laRGtse8~e l3aFfer aleag \1.1861 EtF8& Rat eleserieeEl RBS"@! skalll3e gf~V::H and ffllHRtaiaeEl at a miRiauJFfl Height of ~ feet. 5. Perimeter sod from reauired hedl!e rows to adiacent edlle of oavement is to be St. Augustine 'Savannah' or 'Floratam'. 6. Maintenance of Perimeter Plantinl!s: hedees are to be maintained so thai thev are uniform and ooaaue. Hedees must be maintained so that thev are uniforrnlv ooaClue from the eround to the reouired heieht. 7. Maintenance: Perimeter hedees, trees, and sod. are to be professionallv maintained free of weeds. and be edeed weeklv. Perimeter beds visible from off-site are to be free of weeds and trash. 8. Irril!ation: a. Irrieation flood bubblers shall be utilized at the base of everv Ouercus vinziniana 12 reauired] and Saba! oalmetto f1 reQuiredl. Flood bubblers are to be seoarate1y zoned from adiacent sorav systems. Document Date: Q8~Bl:ler Ii, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 7 of 22 b. Perimeter hedges and adiacent sod are to be irrigated with sorav irrigation heads. Rotarv bodies and heads are soecificallv not allowed in oecimeter areas. Covenant Church shall orovide five sets of landscaoe and irrigation olans to the Pine Ridee Architectural Review Board for review and aODroval Drior to Church's SDP submittal to Collier Countv. It is understood that the Pine Ridge Civic Association may. at its own exoense, retain a orofessional Landscaoe Architect for the ourooses of ensurinll: soecifications comoliance. c. Water aualitv: Water used for irrieation of reauired olantines visible from off site must incoroorate aoorooriate technololl:ies to orevent stainine of Davement or reauired olant materials. B. Parking Lot Lighting Pole lights shall be restricted to a maximum of 16 feet in height, measured to the top of the emitting fixture, and their use shall be further restricted to interior parking lots and at ingress-egress drives. Campus lighting shall be limited to bollards, landscape and building lighting fixtures. Bollards shall have a maximum height of 48 inches. C. Existing Ingress - Egress Driveways Existing driveways will be eliminated or reconfigured, as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan, as the tracts are redeveloped. D. Open Space The project will provide and maintain a minimum of 30% of gross project area [Le. not less than 4.8:1:acres] as open space. Open space includes but is not limited to landscape buffers, interior landscaping, building foundation landscaping, dry water management areas and lakes. At the time of build-out, and thereafter, the project shall provide and maintain a minimum of 40% of the gross project area [Le. not less than 6.3:1: acres] as open space. Build-out, relative to this provision, shall be the time when 80.000 square feet of structures exist within Tract A. E. Water Management The existing 3.3:1: acre borrow pit lake, wilieR dellS BElt /Beet CSIIBty develeJ'l/BElBt slltBdllfGG fer lake efOSS seetisRs, assseiated slspes aRd lillerlli l1!eBBS, shall be reconfigured and relocated as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. The project shall provide the greater of the capacity required by water management design standards for a 3 day, 25 year storm event, or the capacity of the existing lake. Capacity may be met, in part. with dry water management areas. A 88 Elis9Rarge de~dgR saall ee 6Y.talY&ted fer the steFfR ~::ater fRRRagefR6at system .:AliSA meets eeffifH8reial 188ft yes sta888f86 ana skall he impleffi6ateEl if Hat RtB"Fe 8estly lR&A Ii eeaventiaaal aesiga and pf€)\'ieeEl it 8885 Hat feEIYiFe HlsdifieatieR ef tHe sHe }318.8 aeaigH.The surface water manaeement svstem shall be deshmed such that no surface water runoff or discharee is directed towards or into the Pine Ridge Estates surface water management svstem including adiacent roadside swales to the north, east and south. The surface water manaeement svstem shall be a zero discharee svstem or the discharee shall be routed to the west through existiDl! or new drainaee facilities in Trail Boulevard, Tamiami Trail North (SR-45) and then ultimatelv to the Gulf of Mexico. Document Date: 081011.. t 1, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 8 of 22 Water management areas required for the existing facilities that are to remain. including those within Tract B, may be met by the facilities and capacity in Tract A. These areas of existing facilities may be located outside of the Tract A management containment berm provided that compensating water management areas for the acreage have been provided. Tract B shall be integrated into the master water management system if and when Tract B is redeveloped. The minimum lake setback from the CFPUD boundary, as measured at control elevation, shall be 25 feet. See fencing and associated landscape installation standards within this Ordinance. Subject to final jurisdictional agency permitting, the designed capacity of the proposed storm water management system shall at a minimum provide for the following noncumulative development standards: pretreatment of not less than the first half inch of rainfall over the project's entire impervious area, and the greater of 150% of water quality base requirement (not less than 2.5 inches over the entire project's impervious area) within dry water management areas and not less than 1.5 inches over the entire project. The balance of the project's stormwater management capacity shall provide fef 8.ee~taReel of 8f8.iRage from aRe Sf more ahutaRg feac:tsiae swales -;ia eOAfleetieAS 18 the \"/et EleleatieR 0r r.eteatieR system, iR aaaitiaa Ie serviag as the sytiall fer the I3fajeet's af)' \\'8ter ffiQRageJ1=ReHt areas. comoensatorv water qualitv for the oortion of West Street adiacent to the oroiect. The West Street roadside swale and one or more abuttinl! roadside swales shall be redesiened to allow run off from the existine roads adiacent to the oroiect to flow to the outfall route. The outfall route shall be desiened to acceot these additional flows. The Pine Ridee Civic Association. Inc.. [its successors and assiens 1 shall be notified in writinl! bv the apolicant. not less than thirty (30) days l'rior to the submittal of anv aoolication to the Countv or South Florida Water Manaeement Districl ["SFWMD"] relatinl! to or involvinl! anv of the orooertv within the CFPUD. of anv orooosed submittal of an aoolication to the Countv or SFWMD. tOl!ether with a coov of all of the materials prooosed to be submitted to the Countv or SFWMD. Proof of such prior written notification to the Pine Ridee Civic Association. Inc. shall be orovided to Collier County. Parking spaces fronting buffer and landscape areas shall utilize the Land Development Code development standard that permits vehicular overhang to lessen the amount of pavement and therefore reduce impervious area. The plaza area located between the central campus buildings and the campus perimeter sidewalk and/or curb shall be a minimum of 50% pervious. F. Flat roof prohibition. Flat roofs may not be utilized as a primary or principal roof component. Flat roofs may be utilized for secondary roof areas when hidden from view by the use of articulated architectural elements which create and provide for an articulated roof line. G. Project Phasing. The attached Master Plan depicts the redevelopment of Tract A. It is understood that the redevelopment is likely to be realized over a number of phases which will likely include the retention of one or more existing buildings and their associated improvements between phases. H. Preserve. Document Date: DstaBIF 1~. Januarv 9. 2009 Page 9 of 22 The minimum required native vegetation for this site is 44 native trees for the previously developed portion of this site and a minimum of an additional 0.12 acres of created preserve (15% of the existing 0.8 acres of native vegetation). The location of the 44 trees is proposed to be within the perimeter landscape buffer along West Street and Myrtle Road. The site location for the created preserve is a dry water management area identified on the CFPUD Master Plan. This location is subject to jurisdictional agency review and approval. I. Parking Space Requirements and Restrictions. The minimum parking spaces provided shall be 3 for each 7 seats within the house of worship. There shall be no additional parking requirements for the additional uses. The maximum number of vehicular parking spaces, exclusive of loading and drop-off parking areas shall be 500. Should Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted parking intensity for the combined Tracts shall be aggregated. J. Hours of Operation Restrictions: 1. Child care and School: between 6:30 am and 6:30 pm, Monday through Friday; for operational hours. Normal operational hours may be exceeded up to 4 times per month for accommodation of special functions. 2. Adult care: between 6:30 am and 8:30 pm. 3. Non worship use of the facilities: between 7:30 am and 10:30 pm. I Document Date: 0.1000.11, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 10 of 22 TABLE 1 (for Tract B) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (for Tract B) Table I, together with the text which follows below, sets forth the development standards for land uses within Tract B of this CFPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP). ""- ~. .<.L' .. L ~ ~" . L ~1'" PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY MlD CONDITIONf.L yggs MINIMUM LOT AREA 1. 9:t acres N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 236 ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS ~ The greater af 3Q (1. Br {Be zaRed heigHt SPS (fF8IIl right af way) af s tmstHre MINIMUM Y.YmS (lletweeR h'BetIl) Front Existine The erei!ter of 30 ft. or the zoned hei2ht SPS of structure Exoanded buildinlZs(7) 50 ft. for exoanded oortion SPS New structures 50ft. SPS Side The gRlater sf 15 ft. SPS ExistinlZ 20 ft. Be 1/1 tHe ~eAeEl hHildiRg keigkt New structures 30ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN The greater of 15 ft. or \12 the sum of the SPS STRUCTURES zoned building heights MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 35 ft.'-'-' 35 ft. MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 45M ftY~'" 45M ftY) MAXIMUM NUMBER OF z<3) 2 STORmS MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 2,500 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE (4' House ofWorship(5) 5,600 sq. ft. Accessory Uses aRd !lilY lIflJlre..'ed CeRc:fitis8s1 UBe~ 12,400 sq. ft. CirculationIMaintenancelStorage 2,000 sq. ft. I Document Date: Qalall.r 11, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 11 of 22 See referenced notes (1) through (aID next page. (1) Includes the vertical distance between the finished floor elevation and the average center line eleyation of abutting roads, which is estimated to be between 4 feet and 5 feet. Maximum actual height may be exceeded by up to ;!G-7 feet by one non habitable building elements, singularly er iR eemBiRatisR, such as a steeple, cupola, or religious symbol~ er etller ellelulled Ileight lleFffiitted by 10C SlIBseetieR 4 .(;)2.(;)I.D.I, liS may Be IIffieReed. The maximum combined SQuare footaQ:e of such buildine elements shall be 2.000 sf. Exclusive of mezzanines, loft areas and attic or attic storage areas. Should both Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted intensity shall be aggregated. House of worship square footage not utilized shall be available for accessory uses. AR iRereaGe iR tRe alleeated Rellse €If '....sFSRill sqear-e restllge sRall re"luire Il!lflFEl\'1I1 ef II CeRditieRaI Use lletitieR. The maximum square footage of any individual room shall be less than the square footage of the house of worship. Exoansions which add SQuare footaee to anv existinQ: individua1.buildine are limited to cumulative maximum of 20% of the buildinQ:'s SQuare footaQ:e as of the date of PUD aoprovaL A siQ:ned and sealed survev of the existine buildine(s) orooosed for exoans)on and an additional exhibit oreoared bv and siQ:ned and sealed by a orofessional eni!:ineer who deoicts the oroDOsed and all orior exoansions since the date of PUD aooroval. shall be submitted with the associated SDPA and buildine oermit aoolications. If Tract B and Tract A are owned or controlled or develooed bv the same oerson or entity, then the "Table I (for Tract A) "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS" shall be utilized for all orooertv within the CFPUD , includine Tract B. If Tract B and Tract A are owned or controlled or deve100ed bv the same oerson or entitv. there will be no direct access to or from West Street. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) l2) I Document Date: Oetebe. 11, JanuaTV 9. 2009 Page 12 of 22 A. Buffers 1. Except as otherwise required or provided herein, perimeter buffers shall be installed concurrently with the redevelopment improvements in their proximity. All rieht-of-wav oerimeter 1andscaoe buffers shall be installed with the first SDP for a new oermanent bui1dine on Tract B. 2. All required buffer trees along Ridge Drive and West Street shall be shade trees. 3. Hedges within perimeter landscape buffers along West Street and Ridge Drive shall be grown and maintained to a minimum height of 4-6 feet,~ and, Is a ReigRt sf 5 feet wileR net aIlllltiRg a vel1ielllar JlllfieRglel. 4. There shall be no surface water management use within the perimeter buffers. B. Parking Lot Lighting Pole lights are restricted to a maximum height of 16 feet, measured to the top of the emitting fixture, and their use is further restricted to interior parking lots and to meeting arterial level requirements at ingress- egress drives. Bollards shall have a maximum height of 48 inches. C. Existing Ingress - Egress Driveways Existing driveways shall be eliminated or reconfigured, as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. as the site is redeveloped. The two restricted one-way access driveways serving Tract B shall be removed with the dislllaeement reconstruction. reolacement or demolition of the existing buildings. Thereafter, the ingress-egress to the Tract will be via shared driveways located within Tract A. D. Open Space The project shall provide and maintain a minimum of 30% of gross project area [i.e. not less than 4.8:tacres] as open space. Open space includes but is not limited to landscape buffers, interior landscaping, building foundation landscaping, dry water management areas and lakes. At the time of build-out, and thereafter, the project shall provide and maintain a minimum of 40% of the gross project area [Le. not less than 6.3:t acres] as open space. Build-out, relative to this provision, shall be the time when 80,000 square feet of structures exist within Tract A. Tract B shall include buffers that meet the LDC landscape requirements for buffers, interior landscaping and building foundation planting areas. These and any other landscaped and open space areas shall contribute to the overall open space requirement of the CFPUD. The minimum open space requirement for Tract B and its associated contribution toward meeting the gross CFPUD minimum open space requirement shall be 20% of the gross area of Tract B. I Document Date: QstBIHJf 11. Januarv 9. 2009 Page 13 of 22 E. Water Management The existing 3.3:t acre borrow pit lake, "I:Riell dees oet meet COlloty de':elellmeot slWldaFEis fer lake eress seetieos, Ilsseeiated slelles aod Ihteral :woes, shall be reconfigured and relocated as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. The project shall provide the greater of the capacity required by water management design standards for a 3 day, 25 year storm event, or the capacity of the existing lake. Capacity may be met, in part, with dry water management areas. .A. Be diseharge ElesigR saall I;)e evahtatea for the stefffi OJ/mer mtlRageffi6Rt system wkieh meets eeFRfHereiallaH8 tlse staRaards aRe shall he ilRflemeatea jf Bet fRer-e eastly tRan a eas"/8ntieH81 desigR aRa IUS"..idea it sees HBt FeflHiFe fflsElifisatieR of the site 131M aesiga. The surface water manal!ement svstem shall be designed such that no surface water runoff or discharee is directed towards or into the Pine Ridl!e Estates surface water manaeement system includine adiacent roadside swales to the north. east and south. The surface water manal!ement svstem shall be a zero discharee svs1em or the discharl!e shall be routed to the west throueh existinl! or new drainage facilities in Trail Boulevard. Tamiami Trail North (SR-45) and then Pelican Bay ultimately to the Gulf of Mexico. Water management areas required for the existing facilities that are to remain, including those within Tract B, may be met by the facilities and capacity in Tract A. These areas of existing facilities may be located outside of the Tract A management containment berm provided that compensating water management areas for the acreage have been provided. Tract B shall be integrated into the master water management system if and wi!en Tract B is redeveloped. Subject to final jurisdictional agency permitting, the designed capacity of the proposed storm water management system shall at a minimum provide for the following noncumulative development standards: pretreatment of not less than the first half inch of rainfall over the project's entire impervious area, and the greater of 150% of water quality base requirement (not less than 2.5 inches over the entire project's impervious area) within dry water management areas and not less than 1.5 inches over the entire project. The balance of the project's stormwater management capacity shall provide fef aceeptanee af elraiAage ffefR eRe er male oouttiRg f08.8Siae s",,-/ales via eORReetisas is the ":let deteRtiofl at FeteRtieR system, ia aatiitiea 18 S6fYiRg as tMB SHiraH f<lr the prejeet's Sty "xater ffiaaagemeRt 8fe8S. comoensatory water auality for the oortion of West Street adiacent to the oroiect. The West Street roadside swale and one or more abutting roadside swales shall be redesi2ned to allow run off from the existine roads adiacent to the oroiect to flow to the outfall route. The outfall route shall be desi2ned to acceot these additional slows. The Pine Ridee Civic Association. Inc.. fits successors and assi2ns] shall be notified in writin~ bv the aoolicant. not less than thirty (30) davs prior to the submittal of any aoolication to the South Aorida Water Manaeement Distric1 r"SFWMD"] relatine to or involvine anv of the orooerty within the CFPUD. of anv orooosed submittal of an aoolication to SFWMD, toeether with a CODY of all of the materials orooosed to be submitted to SFWMD. Proof of such orior written notification to the Pine Ridl!e Civic Association. Inc. shall be orovided to Collier Countv. Parking spaces fronting buffer and landscape areas shall utilize the Land Development Code development standard that permits vehicular overhang to lessen the amount of pavement and therefore reduce impervious area. Document Date: Oetee9t 11, January 9. 2009 Page 14 of 22 F. FIat roof prohibition. Flat roofs may not be utilized as a primary or principal roof component. FIat roofs may be utilized for secondary roof areas when hidden from view by the use of articulated architectural elements which create and provide for an articulated roof line. G. Project Phasing. It is understood that the redevelopment may be realized over a number of phases and may include the retention of the existing buildings and associated improvements between phases. H. Parking Space Requirements and Restrictions. The minimum parking spaces provided shall be 3 for each 7 seats within the house of worship. There shall be no additional parking requirements for the additional uses. The maximum number of vehicular parking spaces, exclusive of loading and drop-off parking areas shall be 100. Should both Tract B and Tract A be in the same ownership, then the permitted parldng intensity of the combined Tracts shall be aggregated. I. Hours of Operation Restrictions: ), Child care and School: between 6:30 am and 6:30 pm, Monday through Friday; for operational hours. Normal operational hours may exceed up to 4 times per month for accommodation of special functions. 2. Adult care: between 6:30 am and 8:30 pm. 3. Non worship use of the facilities: between 7:30 am and 10:30 pm. 4. Worshio between 6:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. Normal operational hours mav be exceeded UD to 2 times Der month for accommodation of sDecial functions. I Document Date: get9Bsr 11, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 15 of 22 ,i~ ~'. ;a. i~! !If! ., , i i 1 i ----' i 1 i i , ~~ ! ~!il .ri.: i ~ ..j i 1'1' " , , , -.---j I I~OOOOllUlLll:'''M'''IO''l~Zlll:'CNOI'''jIWOOllll1olllLll;otrj''''''j I i I! A111W.:lnruls",.n A-'''''JJ1~:...n AllMi'.:lJ~-I"" ---j J l__~-~:_=_____~:~~__i1 ---~-~':_~"~--j U -.--.-., , i _ I _! I >~, - ,~~! I ~,_! - 013.., 'ii., I ti _.~ i !~ i i , - , i I I ----< Ii - i I I I I - I I ~Il L 7~ t ,. I ~"' 'i[5~: I ,i, ' '.! - '1 I i _ , i ~._._._J ----ll r::~~~:':-':::~:-r=;:;:::;::~~"""~:;~'-::-;.= 1 i I J.'~~~:"'~"" J.ll~~W~"''' 11I~-'~~J~~~:"" i llli~il I I i I 111'lill il I . i. j lillllll ~ I ~,I ~III ~ i 1IIIIIi!II!lilll ill . .11 I ill Iii nil i : ~ 4 II I .' ~ :,.', . 5 I , ()~f ,- - Ii d,~ <( ~ ~I ql, ~ ~ sl:1i ~ ' , ~:- ~ I I~i ~ I o~ ,., . l! ;~ !:! 8~ 01 2 lli ":1 I .. . ~1I11 ~iil ! I it IE ~Ilq c:Y~ I , I . , II II II!, ... I III, ii, 1'11111 " 'ii, ,I Iii I I ',. 'i IIi I ill;1I1 illil ;11 I I~ I"~ III I EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPI'ION (TRACT A) FOLIO NUMBERS: 67285160009,67285280002,67285360003,67285320001 LOTS 1-7 AND 10-13, BLOCK "0", PINE RIDGE EXTENSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 51, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (TRACT B) FOLIO 67285400002 LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 0, PINE RIDGE EXTENSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. I Document Date: gBt9B8f 11, Januarv 9.2009 Page 17 of 22 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC (TRACT A) 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A. Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements which requires sidewalks within road right-of-way; except that sidewalks shall be provided along Trail Boulevard and along that portion of Myrtle Road between Trail Boulevard and the project ingress-egress driveway to Myrtle Road. In lieu of providing the sidewalks along the balance of the abutting right-of- way, the property owner shall install a parallel row of royal palms on the west side of Trail Bouleyard to match the proposed royal palms within the required landscape buffer fronting Trail Boulevard. The developer shall also construct one sidewalk extension from the central building campus across Trail Boulevard to the pavement along US 41 to provide access to an existing bus stop. as conceptually depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4Jl6.05.N. which requires naturalization of man made lakes and water management areas through the use of curvilinear edges; to permit accomplishment of the intent through the use of a curvilinear landscape installation instead of a curvilinear physical contour. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.05.D.2.a. which provides that no more than 30% of the canopy trees may be substituted by palms within an individual Type D Buffer to permit up to 100% utilization of palms along Trail Boulevard provided that the percentage of palms does not exceed 30% of the required perimeter buffer trees for Tracts A and B; and. that the palms utilized are Royal Palms; and, that all required buffer trees along Myrtle Road, West Street and Ridge Drive shall be canopy/ shade trees. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 5.05.08.E.2.c. Minimum ratios. Pedestrian pathway connections must be provided from the building to adjacent road pathways at a ratio of one for each vehicular entrance to a project. Drive aisles leading to main entrances must have at least a walkway on one side of the drive isle; to permit a reduction to a maximum of five: two (2) to Trail Boulevard, one (I) to Myrtle Road, one (I) to Ridge Drive and one (I) to West Street; all as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.01.A 10 eliminate the required buffer between Tracts A and B; provided that the equivalent square footage of the 10 foot wide buffer, for that length not provided, and the associated tree requirement of I tree per 30 linear feet, is located elsewhere within the Tract. Should the entire CFPUD acreage be submitted for permitting as a single SDP, the buffer would not be required and therefore this deviation request would not be applicable. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Subsections 5.03.02.E.2. and 5.03.02.E.4. to eliminate the requirement for a nonresidential development located opposite a residentially zoned district to provide a four (4') foot masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wal110caled a minimum of three (3) feet from the rear of the right-of-way landscape buffer line. I Document Date: Oet.lIe. 11, Januarv 9.2009 Page 18 of 22 (TRACT B) 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A. Sidewalk and Bike Lane Requirements which require sidewalks within abutting rights-of-way. The property owner shall make a payment in-lieu of providing sidewalk segments which would otherwise be required orior to the issuance of the first SDP for a new oermanent buildine. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.0I.A to eliminate the required buffer between Tracts A and B; provided that the equivalent square footage of the 10 foot wide buffer, for thaI length not provided, and the associated tree requirement of I tree per 30 linear feet, is located elsewhere wi1hin the Tract. Should the entire CFPUD acreage be submitted for permitting as a single SDP, the buffer would not be required and therefore this deyiation request would not be applicable. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Subsections 5.03.02.E.2. and 5.03.02.E.4. to eliminate the requirement for a nonresidential development located opposite a residentially zoned district to provide a four (4') foot masonry wall or prefabricated concrete waUlocated a minimum of three (3) feet from the rear of the right-of-way landscape buffer line. I Document Date: Qeta\:rBr 11, Januarv 9. 2009 Page 19 of 22 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS (TRACT A) 1. The initial redevelopment SDP for Tract A shall include: a. the replacement of the existing lake with a new 1ake(s) and associated dry water management. areas ; b. the redevelopment of landscape buffers abutting the lake(s) and associated dry water management areas; c. the re-grading of the right-of-way green space between the CFPUO boundary and edge of pavement of the four adj acent roadways to enhance storm water management for these roadway areas. 2. The minimum throat length as measured from the roadway edge of payment to the internal parking area shall be 50 feet for driveways from Myrtle Road, Wes1 Street and Ridge Drive; and, 75 feet for driveways from Trail Boulevard. 3.The Cl:uusl:t skall 13r.e\'ide watNe seRifel BY la':: eRFer-eemeAt €If a ]8":1 0R~feefHeRt ~fJf8veEl S8FViee I'Fe-;ieler fer S8R'iees BRa ether fleriaEls QRc! e-/8Rls ef eigRifieaflt traffie g8R8f8tisR, at leeetisa(s) ts ee deteADiaed BRei 10 ~e eased OR fleed; Sl:ll3jeet tEl tke 8lifJFevsl €If the Callier CSt:lBty Tfft85fJl3FtatioA :\afRiRistraler af his t1esigHee. 3. For services and other oeriods and events of sienificant traffic eeneration. as determined bv Collier Countv staff. traffic control bv law enforcement or a law enforcement aooroved service orovider shall be as directed bv Collier County staff. with staffine and at location( s) as directed bv the Collier Countv Transoortation Administrator or his desif!nee. 4. The Ridge Drive primary egress driveway will be restricted to a "no right turn" condition. The Myrtle Road egress driveway will be restricted and signed to a "no left turn" condition. A violation of these turn restrictions constitutes a violation of County Ordinances for which the Sheriff's Office mav issue citations. The Myrtle Road access shall be closed at dusk. 5. A south bound turn lane on Ridge Drive, extending from the egress driveway to US 41, shall be constructed concurrently by the property owner with the initial redevelopment phase of development. 6. The seating capacity of the House of Worship shall be limited to 780 seats (980 for the entire CFPUD). and the total number of students/individuals enrolled in Child!Adu1t Day Care / Pre- K1Kindergarten / School, limited to 1" through 3'd, within Tract A shall be limited to 60 persons unless the Tract B owner aerees to reallocate all or a portion of its allocation to Tract A (110 for the entire CFPUD), until US 41 turo lanes serving the site are extended to meet design standards; or a traffic study, based in part on actual traffic counts, is provided to and confirmed by the County, demonstrating that the existing turn lanes are adequate. The traffic counts for this traffic study will be taken during the first quarter of a calendar year to more accurately portray peak season loading measures and will include traffic counts at Myrtle Road and West Street and Ridee Drive and West Document Date: getel'ler 14, Januarv 9.2009 Page 20 of 22 Street. One vear after the seatinl! caoacitv of 980 for the entire CFPUD and the 110 oerson Child!Adult Dav CarelPre-KlKinderearten/Schoollimited to I Sl throueh 3rd for the entire CFPUD is reached, a At tRe time sf tile 6lHdy, supplemental traffic eSlIRts studv will be ~one to determine the trips originating or leaving the CFPUD through the neighborhood. The traffic counts for this suoolemental traffic studv will be taken durin!! the first quarter of a calendar vear to more accuratelv oortrav oeak season loadinl! and will include traffic counts at Ridee Drive and West Street and MYrtle Road and West Street. This supplemental data will be utilized by the County to determine if additional improvements to minimize impact to the neighborhood are appropriate and should be required to address the existine uses and as a condition of approval for the additional seating capacity of 220 and!or the additional 110 students/individuals. (TRACT B) l.Tke Cluuek shall ~fe~/iae tf8ffis seRtrel by law:: oo.fofeemeat Bf a l&\~: eAf{Jfooment RfJpnT:ed ser';iee fJfeaJider far ssr-,jees BAd ether (3eAe8S aRa e-;eats sf sigaifieaRt trat:f.ie gea8f8aeR, at leeatieR(s) te 1ge EletemliRed af.u:l 18 I;te eRsee eN ReeEl; 6aBjeet 18 tAB RfJI'reyal sf tlte Callier CeliRi)' TFBR8~8FlBtieR .~.dFRiHi6tfater Sf kis 8esigRse. I. For services and other oeriods and events of sienificaJ)t traffic !!eneration. as determined bv Collier Countv staff. traffic control bv law enforcement or a law enforcement aooroved service orovider shall be as directed bv Collier Countv staff, with staffine and at location! s) as directed bv the Collier County Transoortation administrator or his desienee 2. A payment-in-lieu-of contribution shall be made by the property owner to the County for otherwise required sidewalks within abutting right-of-way to Tract B prior to issuance of the first Site Development Plan for a new oermanent buildin!! on Tract B..ar Site De','ele!llfleRt PI8R .^,meR9fl1eRt, as !Ray ee a13!llieaIl1e, sllllsetJlIeRt 18 tile lljl!lf8'/a1 sf this CFPUD. I Document Dale: Oeteb.. 11, Januarv 9.2009 Page 21 of22 EXHIBIT G JOB CODE: HCFPUD SCALE: \.-30' ! 9 1! y .:1 f ~ ~ ., ~ l -< " ~ Adjacent AVCfIllC Centerline Road Elcvlllion Front Elevation 1 ~ ] y . '" !I' '6 = ] ., ~ Permitted ExclUliona Limited. to 4,000 s.f. Maximum :i! ] Adjacent Average Centerline RD&d Elevation Rear Elevation DATE; 12.2.01 FILENAME: exbibit 0 Roof Line MW Po;.! .fRoof 1 ] J M;d Poiot of Roof 1 ;; ] J Q. GRAOY MINOR & ASSOCtA lES, P.A. avLl!M\lNllEllII_I"UIDSUlYlMll& o1'l.ANlill!Mot.\ND9C\l'!A1Cfllla.,.,. _.._ . _UII.. ~..... .......,..... --- -- .._-,,~~.._" --..-".....- ............."''''''...- .""..".cJIlAtJYI,I~.oo'" AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Ij~ p~V PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 9 A O~CE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. NAME: /~eYf- AJler;~~ ADDRESS: Cj2LJO k~t4S/pt"k/] I/~tf. sf. M-1J!12( A J U ~0 OTHER: REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No. 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUI~DING, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ,A AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ~t/ LJZ - 2a:> 7 /l/?- 120'17 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Lbl/E/VA/VT ;fi{3/S'17D?/,4 N &t-,//;'C~ PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEr HEARD. _. NAME: /'L.?,ctllZtJ /1 [:..I/Ad;7~F7Z ADDRESS: 23 L . '/R-v A1l~L&3 // :$'/10:;; REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: OTHER: M ~'1_ /? c! #1 /Gl.'72a~.( oN712v L t/J'r1.n-?/ T71~Z:. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No. 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL lOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY lOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUilDING, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAil, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: ~ /1JD . AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ~ 91) PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. N.." Gt?oR4E B~ddAJte AD....,,, /~. &UU ~ ~ 3I(bY / ~-~~ REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: OTHER: I ~ . COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No. 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUilDING, 3301 EAST T AMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. r AGENDA ITEM TITLE: pvpz. -'p(ov1-1Jr1... -/...('o<j7 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: cr -A PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. NAME: ," ;6,E/-l )C/,A/& ADDRESS: ub /11 Y;f. 7i~ I OTHER: d.tJ /f/ /J/& ~ J' / REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No, 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 EAST T AMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: M l/e.JoJ<"_ /1 7t/'P AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ell! PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. NAME: ;1 //; .. - J '" VI""5 ADDRESS: {, g (, 0 /01/ ,;] I./d REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: ~'C> J ,) OTHER: llNtf 7?'d'l"" ('oJiC,fJ':"C'C COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No, 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. AGENDA ITEM TITLE: C~IIG/IIANT erA P;2i;" S.F~Y7~/fJjCJd I~~MNUMBER: !'u/) 2:.- 200? PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY It e - J;J." 0 ? 7 PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. NAME: -:J~iL~ h SIfE K ADDRESS: 6;;1 {- R I fJ G E f} t2 REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: OTHER: ") E:.LF ; /\jlf~LE5/~L , 3tf,tJJ' COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No, 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. 1'---'--- --.----. ----.. . --. - AGENDAITEMTITlE:--h~I1\Vl.,'I\ I~ P u l) AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: q- A- PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE lEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. ~AME: :)r;)~ ]U XU REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: 1 ADDRESS: Ill! WL-:,t ~ ~'t" ;V"'P/-l5, Pi- 37'/Og / . COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No. 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, W. HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE To ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. L AGENDA ITEM TITLE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE LEFT OF THE DIAS IN THE BOARD ROOM PROR TO THE SUBJECT BEING HEARD. NAME: pnL !t9iJR ADDRESS: 'Jh'/o J 1)(~C;+'l)il.-& LDIYC5-6? bl.-vt? REPRESENTING: PETITIONER: OTHER: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE No. 07-24 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES ~~~~g~~~' ~~:U~~~ ~~~T~~~g~~~~~Ep~S~~~;~~ ~~~~~g~ CWOUHNTY COMTMISSIONERS, REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT , ,. ARMON URNER BUILDING, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL. You ARE LIMITED To THREE (3) MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR. AGENDA ITEM 9-B Co~r County ~ ~~ _ Ad STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION HEARING DATE: JANUARY 15,2009 SUBJECT: VA-2008-AR-13756, PLANTATION ISLAND VARIANCE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Lee Wyatt 2370 Snook Drive Naples, FL 34102 Agent: Lauren Barber Turrell, Hall and Associates 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B Naples, FL 34104 REOUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a nine-foot front yard setback Variance for a principal structure in the Mobile Home (MH) Zoning District, from 25 feet as required by Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.02.01, Setbacks for Base Zoning Districts, to 16 feet; and a site alteration Variance to impact mangroves, pursuant to LDC Subsection 9.04.02.B.1, Variances for Site Alterations within the Plantation Island... Subdivisions. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The approximately 0.14-acre subject property is located east of Everglades City, south of Plantation Drive, on Lot 77, Otter Avenue, in Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Plantation Island, Florida (see location map on the following page). PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF REOUEST: The applicant is requesting two proposed Variances to permit the construction of an approximately 1,832 square-foot, stilt mobile home. Although the subject parcel was largely cleared in 1971, approximately 1,721 square feet of mangroves exist along its eastern and northeastern boundaries. In order to erect the prefabricated structure on the site, as depicted in the Master Plan entitled, "Wyatt Property Site Map" by Turrell, Hall and Associates, Inc., dated February 27, 2007 as revised through September 19, 2007, approximately 139 square-feet of these mangroves would need to be removed from the northeastern portion of the property; and to lessen the structure's v A-2008-AR-13756 Page1of7 N '" ~ " ~ C/) ;5 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -J Nil o W 1100 ...J a: cZ c(:::::! ...JO U tJ !!!;:: ~ ill~iIi ti~";;"~~ <!';;"ffi~~ ~~c:~~ ~~~2~ iii~J:h:~ ~Oa::~WO "- un.. W CO ;0 o o "- W 0: :3 o '" ~ Ii! " P:10711 Wy8ttProperty'lDrawi ngalVVYATTPROPERlY 14.dwg w z ::l_ cu. ~~ w., 3::<: ...JCIl ~l:! Q~ ....'" ~'" cC! CIlO ii ::> ..., Z W W '" ~o ;;!W u::J ii:U:: 00 f-Z ~< IO ",W J!O: w~ t:u "'>- f-"" l;j;g ~f- "'0: ::>< "'''- OJ o ..... M .-< ..... .-< .-< NW .. u >2 we! LU 0: ;;: <>: ::> o >... 00 <<>20 ~5~ mV)OOO ...-1-000 '20........ ~O~~ 00 i= ........... oc:(I-O o....U...-l NZ~Uj '<tOI- c:( ...J c:: <( > c.. c.. Cl !!;il ~I ~I ;tl ~I ail ~I f.o--15 N -I I I '" o T ,~ ~ ~}~ Iw 15 I~ I~ Q.. Iii ,~ 1& <>: ;-~ :1' ..- o ~ '" ~ .. ~ ~ . 0 " c X 0 W 0 m < N " W ~ ~ " G p~ Z o 0 ~ :Z .... ~ ~ <( ~ ~ z ~ W M ~ ~ Ii I w z ~ ~ , t-= ;! ~.,". ....: ~ N ,... {'II o 0 Z o ~ o w w fij iiii c ~ ~ ~ d iiidz c c u Q >- I- ~ W a. o ~ a. l- I- ~ a.. <( ~ W I- en c..:i bON N ..s.1l ~ ~ -= t ~ '" ~ _::1; <1.)O~- ~ ~o.. __U ....:l~ u-t...;- of! If ~ c;n;u -.... c;nl=lg.< <r:: 8 Z cldOoi$ :::::=.~.~ <:? e..su.:! ~:Z ::r::~~S' :::::=~o~a. <1.)~ ~.. ~:=E ~J E-< .ll ~ ~~ , ~ B I J SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: East: South: West: Vacant land; zoned MH-ACSC/ST Canal, then vacant land; zoned MH-ACSC/ST Vacant land; zoned MH-ACSC/ST Otter Avenue, then vacant land; zoned MH-ACSC/ST GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): As noted, the subject property is in Plantation Island, which is designated Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but focuses on the larger issue of the actual use. As residential uses are an authorized use in this land use designation, the proposed mobile home use on the site is consistent with the Subdistrict and, therefore, deemed consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Section 9.04.01 of the LDC gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the authority to grant Variances. The CCPC is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Subsection 9.04.03 A. through H., in bold font below, as general guidelines to assist in making a recommendation of approval or denial. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions, and offers the following: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes. The subject property is located in a platted mobile home subdivision in Plantation Island, which is an area characterized by mangrove forests. As previously noted, the proposed mobile home is a prefabricated structure, and as such, cannot have its 64 x 28-foot dimensions simply altered as a non-prefabricated home could. Consequently, the applicant is restricted by both the dimensions of his lot and the dimensions of his mobile home unit. Therefore, he is requesting that a portion of the site containing mangroves be altered, and that the front yard setback requirement be reduced in order to accommodate the structure. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject ofthe Variance request? Yes. Although a plat has never been recorded, according to a Property Appraiser's records, the parcels in the neighborhood were created in 1970. Nevertheless, the creation of the subject parcel, and its purchase by the applicant in 1987, predate the adoption of the County's Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area design standards, which prevent the applicant from removing the 139 square-feet of mangrove trees necessary to accommodate his mobile home on the site. Therefore, the conditions requiring this Variance request are pre-existing. VA-2008-AR-13756 Page 3 of 7 it without a Variance. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to impact only a small, 139 square- foot area which, as noted on the site plan, would be replaced by a 140 square- foot re- planted area in the southeastern portion of the site, as required by the Department of Environmental Protection. Finally, as depicted in Appendix 1, the requested 16-foot front yard setback would be consistent with existing front yard setbacks in the neighborhood. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes, according to the applicant's environmental consultant, the quality of the mangroves existing on the site is degraded. Rear of the site, looking west, where the elevated walkway to the proposed dock would be located.. View of the property from Otter Avenue, looking west. Mangroves are shown in the background.. Australian pine and Brazilian pepper are visible in the foreground.. V A-2008-AR-13756 Page 5of7 PREPARED BY: JO~D ~CIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: /1 >,r.) RA YM D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ~'--rh.~ SDSAN MURRAY -ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR DEP ARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW kVl HEI I A HTON-CICKO \, ASS ~NT COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: 1~/(-dO? DATE /2..-!f:,O'6 DATE JCJ. -/q-o~ DATE 1'2-/Z;.(U'r 'DATE /.2/.2<!J~ r K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRA TOR ATE UNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN DATE Tentatively scheduled for the February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Meeting. V A-2008-AR-13756 Page 7 of7 RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V A-2008-AR-13756, GRANTING TWO VARIANCES FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, THE FIRST BEING A VARIANCE FROM SUBSECTION 4.02.01.A, TABLE 2.1 (FRONT YARD SETBACKS), AND THE SECOND BEING FROM SUBSECTION 4.02.14.C.4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (MANGROVE TREES), ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to estab !ish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested a front yard setback variance from subsection 4.02.01.A, Table 2.1, of the LDC, from 25 feet to 16 feet (i.e., a 9-foot variance), pursuant to LDC Section 9.04.00, for construction of a single-family stilt home; and WHEREAS, Petitioner has also requested a variance from subsection 4.02.14.C.4 of the LDC, pursuant to subsection 9.04.02.B.1 thereof, to allow dredging and filling of, and related impacts to, 139.4 square feet of mangroves, on a single lot within Unit Three of the Plantation Island Subdivision (umecorded), utilizing the procedure set forth in section 9.04.03 of the LDC; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing with due notice made, and has considered the advisability of granting these variances; and Page 1 of3 This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this ,2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk By: , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ JeffE. Wright Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A (attached): Site Plan BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN Page30f3 day of tf). f- . .j ..:u: ci t 0 \s- o:: n:ui <l: (f)<(~ w (I", WOo... :I: _en..: Cl !::wz 02 z ..., 2: I . <i: ii:i f-f-....J I 0:: l uO< III '- 0 w I- ~ ":f-n: III , <.')"f- w ::5 () " 2n:- :I: :;) w -W:2 I- -, '---, >-....J": Z III ..... ffiu~ >- ::5 :;) ..J (Il OW": Z w w " ....JIf- Q 1:: :I: cS: >-f-f- CIl <l: .... 2ICIl ":f-": CIl 0 0 ~~W w Z .... j 0:: w 0:: 00:::0 0 Cl 0 ZW(') 0 <( 0:: :) (3t;)M <( Q. CO < - - 0 ::5 ( <.')<.')<.') I- ZW2 0 WO::O W 0 '- W ......J 0:: ~ 0:: -<. ii a:::U)S <l: ~ 0 ~/ W Omen 0 >- 0:: ----- :I: ""Zn: z 'Y- ..J <l: .... wOW <( "-.\ 0:: 0 r-0 Q m(j)Z <l: aJ _r CI) cr CIl I w W ....J-::) .... ..J 0v ..::2f- z t:- o :I: I:22 W f- f- ~ CIlOO ::5 ~ z ~ C/lu:2 ::5 ii1 CIl ~ 0~n: 0 a. <l: >'Z<( 0 w 15 CIl <Xl::)I 0:: ~ CIl w CIl <Xl 0 . :;) <l: :I: w guS: 0 (~ W f- 0:: ....J u.. 0::- >- (~ ..J "" 0 ....JOo 0:: a. 0 0 ":00 0 ~ f- <( ....n:....J l.L u. ":<"" (/) w Iox ..J }-Ill~ w f- C/l :;) W ~ W W - ..J n:If- z ~ aJ _f-2 :E ---.\ ::) W i5 0<.'):2 "-.. wZf- ~ w n:ii5n: M ~ ';:- :I: 'Y vC/l<( w f- ........... <'JwG.. W " Z ,n:w 0:: " 0 r--oO :I: J- ::5 OOC/l I- --.j . <( 0 0:: o .. n: 0 .(. 0 ii z20 I- u. ....... w w U 0 ~'v 0 I uOw .~ zwa:: w "- w ----.\ <!::o .... I- :5 w w '.j ~::;gz ..J ..J 0..J< ..J .... Q. <::t:: n:....C/l ~ ::5 w oow 0:: ::5 0 >-Z.... <l: () Cl f-f-=> w w z z:::)~ :;) 1:: s~ ~ ::)<Xl~ 0 <l: z 060 >- 0 w uzn: z a. -. CIl w w n:-< w ::5 0:: woo <.') ::::i=>oo <l: <l: Q. ....J ....J Z W ouw It: UZI c.f-