DSAC Backup 01/09/2008 R
Teresa L. Polaski
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
puigj [JudyPuig@colliergov.net]
Monday, March 22, 2010 8:17 AM
Teresa L. Polaski
RE: DSAC Backup
Nov 2007 Summary of Fire Plan Review Activity.xls; DSAC apps.pdf; Memo Sheet trade-out
FINAL 17 Dec.doc; NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC_Amendment_Request_122007.DOC; Nov
2007 Fire Time Frame Summary.xls
Sure see attached; I will send them separately due to the volume. Here is January 2008.
Judy Puig
Judy Puig, Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Division
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 252-2370
(239) 252-6348 Fax
From: Teresa L. Polaski [mailto:Teresa.Polaski@collierclerk.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:43 PM
To: puigj
Subject: DSAC Backup
Hi Judy,
Can we get a copy of any DSAC meeting backup documents you might have? We only have the abbreviated minutes and
have had requests for backup documents. If you do have this info could I get it for 2008 to current. Thanks
Teresa L. Polaski, BMR Clerk III
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
Minutes and Records Department
239-252-8411
239-252-8408 fax
(T eresa.Po las ki@collierclerk.com)
Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.col11
This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not
be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or
take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message.
Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailinghelodesk@collierclerk.com
quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility
for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to
a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
Office of the Fire Code Official
Summary of Plan Review Activity
November-O?
Architectural Reviews
Sprinkler Reviews
Underground Reviews
Fuel & LP Gas Reviews
Hoods & FSUP Reviews
Alarm Reviews
61 G Sprinkler Reviews
61 G Fire Alarm Reviews
SOP Reviews
Total # of Plans Reviewed
649
92
39
12
14
112
105
126
56
1205
Number of Work Days
Average # of Plans Reviewed per Day
19
63
ASAP Reviews per Building Department:
10 Architectural Fast Track
18 Tents
2 Fire Sprinkler
1 Fire Alarm Fast Track
1 61G Fire Alarm Fast Track
Total # of ASAP Reviews":
Total ASAP Reviews per Day
32
2
"Overtime Reviews are not included in this figure
# of Scheduled Meetings:
Ed:
Bob:
Jackie:
Ricco:
Ken:
Maggie:
Jeremy:
11
10
16
13
19
1
1
Total Overtime Hours for the Fire Code Office
*Overtime Hours Reimbursed by Contractors
130
143 (70 Reviews)
Classes taught by the Fire Code Office:
11/1/07 - Fire Alarm Checklist
11/7/07 - 61 G Fire Sprinkler
11/13/07 - 61G Fire Alarm
Instructor
Ricco Longo
Jackie de la Osa
Ricco Longo
# of participants
23
41
27
In addition to the above-mentioned tasks, The Fire Code Official's Office fields
numerous phone calls, walk-ins, field inspections and impromptu meetings.
Office of the Fire Code Official
2800 N, Horseshoe Dr
Naples. Fl 34104
Community Development & Environmental Services Division
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
To: Zoning, Engineering, & Environmental Services Staff
Thru: Bill Lorenz, Director, Engineering & Environmental Services
From: Susan Istenes, AlCP, Zoning Director
Date: December 17, 2007
Subject: SDP/SDPAlSIP Minor Resubmittal Fee and Procedures (Sheet Trade-
outs)
The Board has approved a new fee of$35 per sheet [or document] for "Site Development
Plan Sheet [or document] Change-out (per CDES policy guidelines)." The new fee is
intended to apply not only to plan sheet trade-outs, but to the resubmittal of any required
documentation not requiring significant review time, and always in the context of a
formal project resubmittal, including cover letter. This documentation would include,
but not be limited to, SFWMD permits, Army Corps & DEP permits, Utility Letters of
Availability, and legal documents such as conservation casement agrcements pending
review by the County Attorney after the project is under review. Application of the new
fee will be at the discretion of the project planner and/or review staff, based on the
criteria below.
The new fee will supersede the established review fee for the applicable resubmittal and
will be applied only when no more than two reviewers have rejected the suhmittal and
only then under one or more of the following circumstances:
When a revision of the applicable plans ~ site, landscape or architectural - is
required to correct staff error or oversight
When a minor revision to the applicable plans - site, landscape or architectural--
not requiring significant review time (that is, more than 15 minutes) is necessary
to correct an omission, error or oversight on the part of the applicant as
determined by the project planner
In order to provide necessary outside agency documents other than plans that do
not require significant review time (no more than 15 minutes), as determined by
the applicable reviewer. Examples include Utility Letters of Availability and
outside agency permits, unless there is significant review time to ensure
consistency with the agency permit and the plans.
For Conservation Easement documents that have their own fee, Environmental
staff will coordinate with the County Attorney's Office to ensure that there will
not be a significant review time if the document needs to be resubmitted (e.g.,
would be an updated title opinion).
There is no limit to the number of pages that may be resubmitted, so long as the above
guidelines are adhered to. The fee also applies to so-called "nominal resubmittals"
provided by the applicant to keep projects alive when the 270-day review period is about
to expire, but only when the sole outstanding requirement is an outside agency permit.
A single document, or, in the case of nominal resubmittals, the resubmittalletter, will be
treated as one plan sheet, since the fee is based on the number of plan sheets.
Projects reviewed as minor resubmittals (sheet trade-outs) will be distributed only to the
reviewer(s) rejecting the previous submittal and the project planner. If the resubmittal
involves individual plan sheets rather than a complete plan set, the sheets may be traded
out by the applicant when the submittal has been approved by the reviewer(s) and project
planner. The Intake Team will oversee the trade-out and an appointment will be
necessary.
Cc: Jim Seabasty, Permitting Supervisor, Zoning Department
Glenda Smith, Operations Manager, Zoning Department
Fire Plan Review
Time Frame Summary
November 2007
Page 1
Fire Plan Review - Time Frame Summary
November-07
Number
of
Reviews
Number of
Days
Average
Time in
Days
# of 1st
Reviews
Approved
"loaf 1st
Reviews
Approved
Percentages
Within Time
Frames
Architectural Reviews
Total 649 6208 9.57
1 st Review 444 4690 1056 333 75% 37/10 Days 27 Day Max
2nd Review 117 861 7.36 20/3 Days
3rd Review 74 576 7_78 24/3 Days
4th Review 9 62 6.89 11/3 Days
5th Review 5 19 380 60/3 Days
Total 2.5 Reviews 20S 1S18 7.40 22/3 Days 17 Day Max
Fire SDrinkler Reviews
Total 92 598 6.50
1 st Review 79 563 7.13 63 80% 96/10 Days 11 Day Max
2nd Review 9 29 3.22 67/3 Days
3rd Review 3 5 1_67 100/3 Days
4th Review 1 1 1.00 100/3 Days
Total 2-4 Reviews 13 35 2.69 77/3 Days 9 Day Max
Underaround Reviews
Total 39 304 7.79
1 st Review 34 278 8.18 32 94% 100/10 Days 9 Day Max
2nd Review 4 26 6.50 0/3 Days
3rd Review 1 0 0.00 100/3 Days
Total 2.3 Reviews 5 26 520 20/3 Days 7 Day Max
Fuel & LP Gas Reviews
Total 12 35 2.92
1 st Review 4 18 4.50 4 100% 100/10 Days 9 Day Max
2nd Review 3 7 2.33 100/3 Days
3rd Review 1 6 6.00 0/3 Days
5th Review 2 2 1.00 100/3 Days
6th Review 2 2 1.00 100/3 Days
Total 2-6 Reviews 8 17 2_13 88/3 Days 6 Day Max
Hood & FSUP Reviews
Total 14 55 3.93
1st Review 9 42 4.67 6 67% 89/10 Days 15 Day Max
2nd Review 4 10 2.50 75/3 Days
3rd Review 1 3 300 100/3 Days
Total 2-3 Reviews 5 13 2.60 80/3 Days 4 Day Max
Fire Alarm Reviews
Total 112 382 3.41
1 st Review 74 332 4.49 41 55% 100/10 Days 8 Day Max
2nd Review 29 43 1.48 100/3 Days
3rd Review 9 7 078 100/3 Days
Total 2-3 Reviews 38 50 1.32 100/3 Days 3 Day Max
Office of the Fire Code Official
2800N. Horseshoe Dr
Naples, FL 34104
Fire Plan Review
Time Frame Summary
November 2007
Page 2
Number
of
Reviews
Number of
Days
Average
Time in
Days
# of 1st
Reviews
Approved
% of 1st
Reviews
Approved
Percentages
Within Time
Frames
61 G Fire SDrinkler
Total 105 138 1.31
N/A 48 28 0.58
1st Review 6 27 4.50 2 33% 100/10 Days 8 Day Max
2nd Review 20 30 1.50 100/3 Days
3rd Review 29 50 1.72 97/3 Days
4th Review 1 1 100 100/3 Days
5th Review 1 2 2.00 100/3 Days
Total 2-5 Reviews 51 83 1.63 98/3 Days 4 Day Max
61G Fire Alarm
Total 126 228 1.81
N/A 46 20 043
1 st Review 17 80 4.71 4 24% 100/10 Days 5 Day Max
2nd Review 32 71 222 100/3 Days
3rd Review 29 47 1.62 93/3 Days
4th Review 1 8 800 0/3 Days
5th Review 1 2 2.00 100/3 Days
Total 2.5 Reviews 63 128 2.03 95/3 Days 8 Day Max
Summary
N/A Reviews 94 48 0.51
1st Review 667 6030 9.04 485 73% 57/10 Days
Corrections 388 1870 4.82 55/3 Days
Overall Totals 1149 7948 6.92
Off;ce of the Fire Code Official
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr
Naples, FL 34104
Advisory Board Application
Page I of2
filson_s
From:
Idejohn@johnsoneng.com
Friday, November 30,200711:05 AM
filson_s
6t:
~:
Subject: New On-line Advisory Board Application Submitted
Advisory Board,AppJication Form
Collier Coun~ Government
3301 E. Tamiaml Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239)774-8999
Application was received on: 1113012007 11 :04:58 AM.
Name: ILaura Spurl!eon DeJohnj Home Phone: !:P9-403-40351
Home Address: /173 Saba! Lake Driv~
City: ~ Zip Code: /341041
Phone Numbers
Fax: ~39-434-932~ Business: ~39-434-03331
. e-Mail Address:~deiohn(ti)johnsoneng.coml
Work Place: ~ohnson Enltineering, Inc~
How long have you lived in Collier County: [:!]
Have you ever been convlded of any offense aglllinst the law? ~
Are you a registered voter in Collier County? ~
Board / Committee Applied for: !Development SclrVices Advisory Committe~
Category: !Land Planneq
Do you currently hdld public oflfice? ~
Do you currently or ever served on a Collier Coanty Board or Committee? ~
. Please list your community activities:
I .
Education:
!Master of Urban Planning. University of Virginia Bachelor of City Plannin!!. University ofVindnial
11/30/2007
Advisory Board Application
Page 2 of2
-.
.
Ex erienee:
ork history includes five years with the City of I'faples Planning Department and over three years a
Senior Planner witlt Johnson Engineering in NaPles. Previous experience includes administering
DC requirements, preparing LDC amendments far new zoning districts and development standards,
reviewing and recommending zoning and development applications for City Council hearings. In
y current capacity I represent residential, comm~ial, and public sector zoning and development
lications thro local Coun and Ci devel ment review channels,
.
.
llf30/2007
Advisory Board Application
Page I of2
filson_s
..._,-_...._---..__.~
From: pwhite@porterwrigt1t.ccm
Sent: Friday, December 1!1, 2007 11 :42 AM
To: filsan_s
Subject: New On-line Advisoiy Board Application Submitted
Advisory Board Application Form
Collier County. Government
3301 E. TallUami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
(239)77.-8999
Application was received ou: 12/1412007 11:41:5$ AM.
Name: !patrick G. whitel Home Phone: ~39-821416531
Home Address: 1473~ West Blvd.1
City: ~ Zip Code: 1341031
Phone Numbers
Fax: 1239-593-29~ ' Business: 1239-593-29631
e-Mail Address:pwhite@Jporterwright.coml
Work Place: !porter, Wright, Morris, & Arthur LLej
How lonf,l have you lived in Collier County: [:ill
Have you ever been ,convicted of any offense af,lalnst the law? ~
Are you a registcred voter in Collier County? ~
Board / Committee Applied for: Ioevelopment Services Advisory Committee/
Category: !Attorne~
Do you currently b~d public offtiee? ~
Do you currently or'ever served on a Collier CO.lnty Board or Committee? ~
Please list our com uni activities:
erican Red Cross! Relay for Life-Team Captain; abitat for Humanity - volunteer construction
orker former Contr tor Licensin Board membe Ci of C Coral
Education:
12/14/2007
'i
Advisory Board Application Page 2 of 2
.A., Biology and Environmental Design, SUNY at Buffalo, NY J.D., Stetson College of Law, St.
etersbur FL
Ex erience:
ver 17 years of experience in the areas of drafting,lmplementing, and applying local and state
overnmental regulatiions in the areas of growth m~gement, zoning, site development and planning
well as building construction, including ensuring compliance with such regulations; extensive
xperience in assuring those regulations may be aptlied in a predictable and consistent manner to
ose the re Ie,
12/14/2007
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text Etril~ethrol;l€Jh is Sl::Jrrent text to be EleleteEl.
Bold text indicates a defined term
LDC Amendment Request
ORIGIN: Florida Rock Industries, Inc. Private Petition
AUTHOR: Doug Lewis and Bruce Anderson in Consultation with County Staff.
DEPARTMENT:
Transportation Division.
AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2008 Special Cycle la
LDC PAGE: LDCl:5-6
LDC SECTlON(S): 1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements
CHANGE: Add that reduction of minimum size, dimension or area of existing yards, lots or parcels is
prohibited except where a portion thereof is being acquired for a present or planned public use and/or
purpose by the County or another governmental entity or by a private party under an agreement with the
County or other governmental entity. This exception already exists in LDC for acquisitions and
condemnation by government or dedication to government. The amendment merely adds that the
exception also applies where a private party is acting on behalf of government. The amendment also
provides that such reduction shall not effect the eligibility of the lot or parcel to sever Transfer of
Development Rights (TOR) Credits where the reduction occurs as a result of acquisition for a present or
planned public use and/or purpose by the County or another governmental entity or by a private party
under an agreement with the County or another governmental entity.
REASON: To encourage property owners to sell for purposes of public right of way, their lands for
the southern and western portions of the Wilson Boulevard Extension depicted in the North Belle Meade
Overlay of the Growth Management Plan. The purpose is to leave owners of Rural Fringe Sending
Lands in the same legal position after an acquisition, of their lot or parcel for a public use and/or purpose,
as the lands were prior to the acquisition.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: This will significantly reduce the costs of acquisition of
rights of way for a public use and/or purpose within Rural Fringe Sending Lands, because the County
will only be paying for the land not for severance damages for TORs that could no longer be severed
from such lots or parcels because of the reduction in size as a result of the acquisition by or on behalf of
the County.
RELATED CODES OR REGULATlONS: Subsection 2.03.07 D. 4. Transfer of Development
Rights (TDR).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: None.
OTHER NOTES/VERSION DATE:
December 20, 2007
Amend the LDC as follows:
1.04.04 Reduction of Required Site Design Requirements
1
C:\T emporary Internet Files\Content. Outlook\M2XOPTYF\NAPLES-#543514-v1-LDC _ Amendment_ Request_ 122007. DOC
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text strikethrou€lh is GUrr-eRt text to be fleleteQ.
Bold text indicates a defined term
A. No part of a required yard, required open space, required off-street parking
space, or required off-street loading space, provided in connection with one
building, structure, or use shall be included as meeting the requirements for any
other, structure, or use, except where specific provision is made in this LDC.
B. Minimum standards; nonconformities created by public acquisition.
1. All lots or yards created after the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14,
2006] must comply with the requirements then established by this Code.
2. No lot, even though it may consist of one or more abutting lots of record,
or yard, existing at the effective date of this Code [Feb. 14, 2006] or
lawfully existing on the effective date [Feb. 14, 2006] of applicable
amendments to this Code shall thereafter be reduced in its degree of
compliance, including its size, dimension, or area, below the minimum
requirements then set forth in this Code, except by reason of a portion
thereof being acquired for present or planned public use and/or purpose
by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party
under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity in
any manner, including dedication, condemnation, purchase, and the like.
a. Required yards on improved lots , lot area, lot coverage on
improved lots, and lot dimensions rendered nonconforming
or more legally nonconforming as a result of being acquired fef
public usa, by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by
a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another
qovernmental entity may be reduced by the same dimension,
area, or amount involved in the dedication, condemnation,
purchase, or similar method of acquisition for public use, but shall
not result in a front yard of less than ten feet (10') in depth.
Accordingly, the resulting degree of nonconformity of the area
and dimensions of a lot and the required yards with this Code's
then current requirements will be deemed lawful unless or until the
remaining lot or yard is recreated, typically by re-development,
re-plat or lot re-combination, at which time such lots and
yards must comply with the requirements then established by
this Code. Further, no conforming lot otherwise qualifying for a
lot split or lot line adjustment pursuant to Section 10.02.02.
B.8; 10.02.02, B.12, 1.04.04 or 9.03.03.A 5 may be denied such
approval solely on the grounds that the resulting lot or lots
would be less than the required minimum area for such lot(s) in
the applicable zoning district as a result of acquisition, from Feb.
14,2006.
b. Other existing site related legal nonconformities, including those
rendered more nonconforming as a result of acquisition-fef
public usa by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by
a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another
qovernmental entity and which pertain to this Code's or other
county code requirements, such as, but not limited to, stormwater
2
C:\T emporary Internet Files\Content. Outlook\M2XOPTYF\NAPLES-#543514.v1-LDC _ Amendment_ Request_ 122007. DOC
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text strikethrol:JgR is G'.Irrent text to Be EleleteEl.
Bold text indicates a defined term
management, landscaping or buffers, preserves, on- or off-site
parking, architectural design standards, etc., will be deemed
legally nonconforming ,and all such resulting nonconformities
may be allowed to remain so nonconforming , unless or until
the remaining lot or yard is subsequently re-created or re-
developed, at which time such site related nonconformities and
development must comply with the then existing requirements of
this Code.
c. In those circumstances where acquisition for publio usa by Collier
County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under
an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity
of a portion of a lot or yard would result in one or more
nonconformities that would require approval of a development
order or permit in order to implement the terms of the acquisition,
i.e., in order to cure or remedy the effect of an aoquisition, (e.g.,
an SOP or building permit required to relocate a prior existing
building ), the County manager, or designee, is authorized to
approve such development order or permit so long as any prior
existing legal nonconformity of the type set forth in b. above
would not be increased.
d. A leqal non-conforminq lot or parcel of less than fiye (5) acres
that was in existence as of June 22, 1999 which is reduced in size
or rendered more non-conforminq as a result of a portion thereof
beinq acquired by Collier County or another qovernmental entity
or by a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or
another qovernmental entity, may be leqally reduced by the same
dimension, area, or amount involved in the dedication,
condemnation, purchase or similar method of acquisition by
Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party
under an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental
entity and the resultinq lot(s) or parcel(s) not acquired by Collier
County or another qovernmental entity or by a private party under
an aqreement with Collier County or another qovernmental entity
shall be deemed a leqally non-confirminq lot or parcel of less than
five (5) acres entitled to severance of base and bonus TOR
credits at a rate of 1 TOR credit per leqal non-conforminq lot or
parcel pursuant to Section 2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC. A lot or
parcel five (5) acres or larqer which is reduced in size as a result
of a portion thereof beinq acquired by Collier County or another
qovernmental entity or by a private party under an aqreement with
Collier County or another qovernmental entity, may be leqally
reduced by the same dimension, area, or amount involved in the
dedication, condemnation, purchase or similar method of
acquisition by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by
a private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another
qovernmental entity and the number of base and bonus TOR
credits qenerated from such resultinq lot(s) or parcel(s) not
acquired by Collier County or another qovernmental entity or by a
private party under an aqreement with Collier County or another
3
C:\ Temporary Internet Files\Content. Outlook\M2XOPTYF\NAPLES-#543514~v1-LDC _Amendment_ RequesC 122007 .DOC
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text Etril~()thr-el:lgR is cf.lrrent text te S8 deletes.
Bold text indicates a defined term
QOVernmental entity shall be calculated pursuant to Section
2.03.07 O. 4. of the LOC based on the lot or parcel acreaQe which
existed prior to the dedication. condemnation. purchase or similar
method of acquisition.
3. This section may be applied to those acquisitions occurring prior to the
adoption of this ordinance so long as the purchase or dedication of the
property has not closed, or the condemnation proceeding relating to the
property acquired has not reached final disposition.
C. Other than provided for immediately above, required off-street parking shall not
be reduced in area or changed to any other use unless the permitted or
permissible use that it serves is discontinued or modified, or equivalent required
off-street parking is provided meeting the requirements of this LOC.
4
C:\ Temporary Internet Files\Content. Outlook\M2XOPTYF\NAPLES-#543514-v1 ~LDC _ Amendment_ RequesC 122007 .DOC