Ordinance 92-050C}{ORDINANCE NO. 92-
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED,
"COLLIER CO~TY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN", FOR
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORFNDA;
AMENDMENT ADDRESSING AND RELATING TO THE ~
PUI2%TED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPART~ NT
COM}4UNITY AFFAIRS DATED MAY 14, 1992; BY ~
AMENDING THE FUTURE I~%ND USE ELEMENT, POLICIES, ~
FUTURE LA34D USE MAP SERIES AND, FUTURE LAND USE~
DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION; BY AMENDING TH~
IMMOKALEE MASTER PLAN, POLICIES; BY AMENDING THE~
GOLDEN GATE MASTER PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE MAP
SERIES, AND GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES; BY
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
W~EREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan by Ordinance Number
89-5 on January 10, 1989, as required by Section 163.3184, Florida
~; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County
adopted certain amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan
on February 15, 1991, by ordinance Number 91-15; and
WHEREAS, Collier County received a "Notice and Statement of Intent
to Find the Collier County Comprehensive Plan Amendments Not in
Compliance" (Docket No. 91-1-NOI-1101-(A)-(N) on March 29 1991,
pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs filed its Petition
with the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) requesting an
Administrative Hearing on the issue of compliance of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan with Chapter 163, Florida $~atute~ and Rule
9J-5, Florida Administrative Code; and
WHEREAS, Intervenors Mathias L. Tari, Donald Segreto, and Southwest
Florida Regional Planning Council were given leave to intervene in the
DOA}{ proceeding on May 21, 1991, October 31, 1991, and January 7, 1992,
respectively; and
WHEREAS, Collier County and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council have entered into a Stipulated Settlement Agreement with-the
Department of Community Affairs requiring that certain remedial plan
amendments be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners; and
- 1 -
WHEREAS, the Stipulated Settlement Agreement requires that the
following Elements and Future Land Use Map series of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan be amended:
Future Land Use; and
Future I~ne Use Map Series; and
Immokalee Master Plan; and
Golden Gate Master Plan; and
Golden Gate Master Plan Future Land Use Map Series; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs, within forty-five
(45) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted remedial Growth
Management Plan Amendments, shall review and determine if these
Amendments are in compliance with the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985; the State
Comprehensive Plan; the appropriate Regional Policy Plan; and Rule
9J-5, Florida Administrative Code pursuant to Subsection
163.3184(8) (a), Florida ~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE: REMEDIAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
This Ordinance, as described herein, shall be known as the 1992
Remedial Plan Amendments for Collier County, Florida. The Collier
County 1992 Remedial Plan Amendments consist of amendments to certain
policies, the Future Land Use Map Series, and the future land use
designation description section of the Future Land Use Element; certain
policies of the Immokalee Master Plan; and certain goals, objectives,
policies and the Future Land Use Map Series of the Golden Gate Master
Plan, more particularly set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION TWQ~ BEVERABZLITY
If any phrase of portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or
unconstitutional by any court of competent Jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such
holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion.
- 2 -
~t EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from
the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the
Secretary of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County this ~day o~, 1992.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JAMES C. GILES, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Approved as to form and ~a~ o..~_ % m.,~,
legal sufficiency: ~
o
MarJorie M. Student
Assistant County Attorney
- 3 -
AMENDED
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 5~
In order to promote sound planning, ensure compatibility of land uses
and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element, the
following general land use policies shall be implemented upon the
adoption of the Growth Management Plan.
*~** *R Policy 5.1:
New residential zoning shall only be permitted at a density equal to
or less than that defined by the Density Rating System. However, any
change to an existing Development Order, whether residential,
commercial or industrial, which meets all of the following criteria
shall be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Any
rezone will be subject to zoning re-evaluation as described in Policy
~v3.1K.
1. The property which is the subject of the existing development
order has ~e=e½ved-e½~her-a-eempat½b&~ty-eMeeD~em-p~s~am~
~e-See~½em-~e-e~-~he-~em½n~-Re-eva½ua~en-e~d~manee
~e~d~nanee-98-~B~-ede~e~-Ma~eh-e~-~99e~-e~-am-exem~en
p~rs~en~-~o-See~o~-~4-e~-~he-Bem~n~-Re-eva~a~en-e~nenee
which been reviewg~ under the Zoninc Re-evaluation Procram
~stablished mursuant to Policy 3.1K and does not require that
the authorized construction commence and continue in good
faith; and
2. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the change to
that development order is consistent with all other elements
of the Growth Management Plan; and
3. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the change
constitutes a significant reduction in the density or
intensity permitted by that development order or results in
other significant benefits to the County. For purposes of
this provision, "significant reduction" shall mean a
reduction in density or intensity equal to or greater than
20%.
S~nanee-wh~eh AD~roved ~3eloDment orders which have b99n reviewed
under the Zoninc Re-evaluation Procram established pursuant to Policy
3.1K and ~e require that authorized construction commence and continue
in good faith may also be found consistent with the Future Land Use
Element provided criteria 2 and 3 are met and the reduction in density
or intensity permitted by that development order is equal to or
greater than 40%.
Changes to approved planned unit developments that have been
determined to be "improved" under the zoning re-evaluation program
**** Amended February,
Amended August 4, ~Z, Remedial Plan Amendment (Ordinance
~Z-50).
LU-I-18
that do not represent an increase to the approved density or intensity
of use shall also be deemed consistent under this policy subject to
the requirements of Chapter 380, F.S. for Development of Regional
Impact which are also PUD's.
The County shall revise this policy to delete the references to the
~in~ Re-evaluation ProGram, when such references are no lonaer
needed and, in addition, to delete the Policy when it is no lonaer
needed~
Policy 5.2~
All proposed development shall be reviewed for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and those found incompatible shall not be
permitted.
Policy $.3t
Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize
the cost of community facilities by confining urban intensity develop-
ment to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map and by
requiring that any changes =o the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous
to an existing Urban Area boundary.
Policy S.4t
New developments shall be compatible with and complimentary to the
surrounding land uses.
Policy 5.5:
Encourage the use of existing land zoned for urban intensity usee
before permitting development of other areas. This shall occur by
planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public
facilities and services to existing zoned land before servicing other
areas.
Policy
Permit the use of cjuster housing, Planned Unit Development techniques
and other innovative approaches to conserve open space and environ-
mentally sensitive areas. Amend the zoning and subdivision
r~gulations as necessary to allow innovative land development
techniques.
~olXoy 5.7t
Encourage recognition of identifiable communities within the urbanized
area of western Collier County. Presentation of economic and demo-
graphic data shall be based on Planning Communities and
recognized neighborhoods.
~ Policy 5.8:
Group Housing which may inulude the following: Family Care Facility,
Group Care Facility, Care Units, Adult Congregate Living Facility and
Nursing Homes, shall be permitted within the Urban Designated Area
~ Amended May 19, 1992
LU-I-19
subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier
County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102, adopted October 30,
1991) and consistent with the locational requirements in Florida
Statutes (Chapter 419.001 F.S.). Family Care Facilities which are
residential facilities occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall
be permitted in residential areas.
**** Policy 5.9:
Properties which do not conform to the Future Land Use Element but are
improved or are found to have vested zoning rights through the Zoning
Re-evaluation Program described in Policy 3.1K shall be deemed
consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
** *R Policy 5.10~
Exemptions based on vested rights or compatibility determinations that
are granted as provided for in the
e=d~nam=e Zonin~ Re-evaluation Pro,ram established pursuant to Policy
3.1k and identified in APPendix 1 shall be considered consistent with
the Future Land Use Element. These properties shall be considered
consistent with the Future Land Use Element only to the extent of the
exemption granted and in accordance with all other limitations and
timelines that are provided for ~n the Zoning Re-evaluation e=~manee
Pro,ram. Nothing contained in this section (policy) shall exempt any
development from having to comply with any provision of the Growth
Management Plan other than the zoning re-evaluation program.
~ Policy 5.11~
Compatibility exceptions granted as provided for in the Zoning Re-
evaluation Program established pursuant to Policy 3.1K shall be
considered consistent with the Future Land Use Element. These
properties shall be considered consistent with the Future Land Use
Element only to the extent of the compatibility exception granted and
in accordance with all other limitations provided for in the Zoning
Re-evaluation Program. Nothing contained in this policy shall exempt
any development from having to comply with any provision of the Growth
Management Plan other than the Zoning Re-evaluation Program.
Compatibility exceptions which receive a positive determination shall
be identified on the Future Land Use Map series. The mapping of
compatibility exceptions shall be completed by January, 1993 and may
be amended as necessary to include any remaining compatibility
exceptions granted pursuant to the Program.
The County shall review this policy to delete the references to the
Zoning Re-evaluation Program when such references are no longer needed
and, in addition, to delete the policy when it is no longer needed.
** Adopted May, 1990
**** Amended February, 1991
$ Amended May 19, 1992
*R Amended August 4, 1992, Remedial Plan Amendment (Ordinance No.
92-50).
LU-I-20
coastal Urban Designated Area seaward of a boundary marked by
Airport Road (in=luding an imaginary extension north to the
Lee County boundary), Davis Boulevard, County Barn Road and
Rattlesnake Hammock Road consistent with the Activity
Center's residential density band located at the southwest
quadrant of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and
County Road 951 (including an imaginary extension to the
east), 1 dwelling unit per gross acre would be subtracted;
and
2. If the project fails to interconnect with all existing
projects when physically possible and fails to provide inter-
connection with all future adjacent projects, up to 1
dwelling unit per gross acre may be subtracted as deemed
appropriate by the BCC.
Conditions~
1. In no case shall maximum permitted density exceed 16
residential dwelling units per gross acre.
2. The maximum permitted density shall not exceed 4 residential
dwelling units per gross acre within the Traffic Congestion
Area which includes the Coastal Management Area, unless it is
increased through conversion of commercial zoning, provision
of affordable housing, use of the provision for residential
tn-fill, or for density awarded within the boundaries of an
Activity Center. Properties adjacent to the Traffic
Congestion Area shall be considered part of the Traffic
Congestion Area if their principal access is to a road
forming the boundary of the Area.
****3. The maximum permitted density shall not exceed 4 residential
* R dwelling units per gross acre within a portion of the Coastal
Management Area which is bounded by the City of Naples to the
west, US 41 to the north and the Area of Critical State
Concern to the east, excepting Marco Island, which shall be
allowed up to 6 dwelling units per gross acre for projects
that qualify for a commercial zoning conversion bonus as set
forth in the Density Rating System. Any project qualifying
for such a bonus shall prepare and implement a hurricane
evacuation plan for the project, which shall be subject to
review by the Collier County Emergency Management Director.
A second exception to this density standard shall be made to
allow a maximum of 12 dwelling units per gross acre (maximum
8 dwelling units per gross acre on Marco Island) for afford-
able housing not to exceed a maximum of 600 affordable
housing units in the Urban Coastal Fringe Area provided
**** A~ended February, 1991
*R Amended August 4, 1992, Remedial Plan Amen4ment (Ordinance No.
92-50.
LU-I-26
appropriate mitigation is provided consistent with Policy
13.1.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
The 600 affordable housing units to be allowed in the Urban
Coastal Fringe Area and elioibilitv therefore will be
determined by using the U.S. Department of Housin~ and Urban
Development income definitions, bedrooms Der unit and
additional guidelines outlined in the Affordable Housing
Density Bonus (AHDB) Ordinance 90-89 adopted on November 27,
1990 and shall be distributed throughout the Urban Coastal
Fringe Area based on hurricane evacuation routes as defined
by the Housing and Urban Improvement Director. All units
(including market rate) awarded by the AHDB Ordinance above
the permitted base density of 4 dwelling units per gross
acre, plus any other density bonus available minus any
density reduction for traffic congestion or coastal
management area shall be counted toward the 600 dwelling unit
cap.
4. Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Parks shall be allowed to
develop at a density consistent with the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Industrial Unde~ Criteria
The Industrial Land Use Designation provides for the full array of
industrial land uses as described in the Zoning Ordinance for
Industrial and Light Industrial Zoning Districts. The Plan also
allows for limited expansion adjacent to those Industrial Designations
provided certain conditions are met regarding access, traffic
circulation and infrastructure provision. In addition, certain
Industrial land uses may be permitted within Urban Designated Areas
under criteria.
The following criteria must be met:
The proposed project must be in the form of an Industrial Planned
Unit Development. Intensities of use shall be limited to:
technological research, design, and product development; light
manufacturing, processing and packaging in fully enclosed
building; corporate headquarters; medical laboratories, clinics,
treatment facilities and research and rehabilitative centers;
printing; lithographing and publishing; and laboratories.
The boundaries of the proposed project must be transitional,
therefore, the uses along the perimeters must be compatible with
non-industrial uses. The project must have direct access to an
arterial and an internal circulation network which prohibits
industrial traffic from traveling through predominantly
residential areas. The project must have central water and sewer
and shall not generate noise or odor so as to be incompatible with
surrounding land uses.
LU-I-27
As a part of the County*s Land Development Regulations, an Industrial
Planned unit Development Zoning District shall be established and
include standards for the following=
Standards for an overall Master Development Plan for the entire
parcel of land and require Site Development Plan approval for each
lot or building area;
List of permitted uses;
Minimum tract size and lot area;
Bufforing, landscaping and open space requirements;
Regulations regarding signage, lighting, outdoor storage, parking
and loading; and
Setback requirements and maximum building height.
**** *R 4. Commercial Under C~er~
Within the Urban-Mixed Use District certain in-fill commercial
development may be permitted. This shall only apply in areas already
substantially zoned or developed for such uses. The following
standards which limit the intensity of uses must be met:
a. The subject parcel must be bounded on both sides by improved
commercial property or commercial zoning consistent with the
Future Land Use Element or commercial property granted an
exemption or compatibility exception as provided for in the
Zoning Re-evaluation e~d&~amee ProGram and should not exceed
200 feet in width, although the width may be greater at the
discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. Uses that
meet the intent of the e-6 C1/T district are only required to
be bounded on one side by improved commercial property or
consistent commercial zoning or commercial property granted
an exemption or compatibility exception as provided in the
Zoning Re-evaluation e~d~na~=e ProGram.
b. The proposed use must not generate in excess of five percent
of level of service C design capacity on abutting streets
that provide access to the project; and
c. The proposed use must not exceed a floor area of 25,000
square feet.
C1/T zoning used pursuant to this subsection shall only be
aDDlied one time to serve as a transitional use and will Dot
**** Amended February, 1991
# Amended May 19, 1992
~R Amended August 4, 1992, Remedial Plan ~unsndment (Ordinance No.
92-50).
LU-I-28
be Der~itted to expand adgacent to other C1;T zonina. The
QDi¥ exception is ~he e×Dansion of C1/T zoning tha~
~pDroved pursuant tO the zoninq Re-evaluation Program. The
CouDty shal~ ~equla~¥ amend the Future Land Use MaD series
~0 ~D~orporate and be consistent with changes in the
zoninq within the Urban-Mixed Use D~strict,
* ~, U~ban - commercia~ District
Through the use of mixed use Activity Centers and neighborhood
centers within large PUDs, this District is intended to accommodate
virtually all new commercial zoning within Urban Designated Areas.
* A. Activity Center Subdistrict
Mixed use Activity Centers have been defignated on the Future Land Use
Map. The locations are based on inter-sections of major roads and on
spacing criteria. The mixed use Activity Center concept is designed
to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where
traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and
disorganized patterns of commercial development and to create focal
points within the community.
With the exception of the three Interchange Activity Centers, the
Activity Centers are all of the same configuration and size - square,
~ mile on a side, measured from the center point of the intersection,
totaling 160 acres. Activity Centers at the 1-75 interchanges have
been specifically defined on the following maps.
*** Existing Mixed Use Activity Centers may be re-designated as
Master Planned Mixed Use Activity Centers. Master Planned Activity
Centers are those which have a unified plan of development in the form
of a Planned Unit Development, Development of Regional Impact or an
area-wide Development of Regional Impact which must encompass at least
one or more full quadrants of a designated Activity the public road
network, Master Planned Activity Centers are Center. In recognition
of the benefit resulting from the coordination of planned land uses
and coordinated access points to encouraged through the allowance of
flexibility in the boundaries, mix, and location of uses permitted
within a designated Activity Center and may be permitted to modify the
square configuration. Consistent with other Activity Centers, Master
Planning Activity Centers are intended to be mixed use in character.
Permitted land uses include commercial, residential, and
institutional. The full array of commercial land uses may be allowed.
The actual mix of land uses shall be determined using the criteria for
other activity centers outlined below. Interchange Activity Centers
are not eligible for the Master Planned Activity Center Designation.
Ail of the following criteria must be met for a project to qualify as
a Master Planned Mixed Use Activity Center:
Amended January, 1990
Amended June, 1990
LU-I-29
AMENDED P~GE8
IHMOKALEE MASTER PLAN
residential area located in the Industrial Designation bounded by New
Market Road and lOth Court South. These efforts to encourage re-
development shall include but shall not be limited to, the upgrading
of substandard structures; reviewing land use patterns; rezoning
inconsistent land uses; and the provision of sidewalks, street
lighting and community beautification.
*R Policy II.1.9:
Those unimproved properties granted
~o-have-ves~ed-=&gh~s-es-p=ov&ded-~n-~he-eo}}&er-eeun~y-Gom½n~-Re-
determination through tho -
pursuant to Policy 3.1K , ' e
in Exhibit 1~ shall be considered consistent with this Master Plan.
This shall also pertain to unimproved properties for which
applications were submitted prior to the ~RO
Pro~ram's application deadline and Master Plan adoption, but were
reviewed after adoption of this Master Plan. Those properties shall
be considered consistent with this Master Plan only to the extent
%he-exemp~&emy-exeep~&enr-er-ves%e&-r~gh~s e e
granted and in accordance with all other limitations and timelines
provided. &n-%he-0on&mg-Re-eva}ua~½en-era~nanee= Nothing contained in
this section (policy) shall exempt any development from having to
comply with any other provision of the Growth Management Plan.
The County shall revise ti ' et
Zonin~ Re-evaluation P s c e
t e o w '
Policy II.1.10~
Upon adoption of the Immokalee Master Plan, no development orders
shall be issued for those properties that are inconsistent with the
Land Use Designations identified in the Immokalee Master Plan.
Properties which do not conform to the Immokalee Master Plan shall be
rezoned by the County to a Zoning District consistent with the Master
Plan. Collier County's Growth Planning Department shall initiate the
rezones for those properties found to be inconsistent with this Master
Plan within six (6) months of Master Plan adoption. These meetings
will be held in Immokalee, whenever possible. Property owners will
have the option of rezoning to a zoning district consistent with the
Master Plan prior to the County initiated rezone. (This objective
shall supersede Objective 1 in the County-wide Future Land Use Element
of the Growth Management Plan.)
~olioy II.1.11~
The County shall evaluate downtown Immokalee and designate a Central
Business District in which the County's off-street parking require-
ments shall be modified to reflect the needed parking for businesses
located in the defined area.
eR A~ended August 4, 1992, Remedial Plan Amendment (Ordinance No.
92-50).
- 13 -
AHENDED P~GES
GOLDEN GATE MASTER PLi~N
Standards and permitted uses for each Future Land Use District and
Subdistrict are identified in the Land Use Designation Description
Section.
Policy 1.1.3=
The AGRICULTURAL/RURAL Future Land Use Designation shall include the
following Future Land Use District:
A, ~ETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT
Standards and permitted uses for each Future Land Use District and
Subdistrict are identified in the Designation Description Section.
Policy 1.1.42
Provisional Use requests shall adhere to the guidelines outlined in
the Provisional Use Description Section.
Policy 1.1.$=
Provisional Use requests shall be approved by the Board of Count~
Commissioners by a Super Majority (4/§) vote.
*R Policy 1.1.6=
Those unimproved properties granted am-e~emp~nT-ex~ep~½en?-e~-~eHn~
eva~a~on-e~fla~ee-~98-~-a~o~e~-Ma~eh-~T-~998~ a Dositive
determination through the Zonin~ Re-evaluation Pro~ram established
pursuant to Policy 3.1K of the Future Land Use Element and identified
~ shall be considered consistent with this Master Plan.
Those properties shall be considered consistent with this Master Plan
only to the extent ~f-~he-exemp~nT-ex~ep~½~n?-~-wes~e~-~h~s of
the determination granted and in accordance with all other limitations
and timelines provided.
Nothing contained in this policy shall exempt any development from
having to comply with any other provision of the Growth Management
Plan.
The County shall revise this policy to delete the references to the
Zonin~ Re-evaluation Program. when such references are no longer
needed and. in addition, to delete the Dolicv when it is nO 1on.er
needed.
Policy 1.1.?=
To encourage higher density residential and promote mixed uses in
close proximity to Activity Centers, those residential zoned
properties permitting up to 12 dwelling units per acre which were
located within and consistent with the Activity Center designation at
Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Parkway (see Appendix 8 of the
Support Document for map) established by the 1989 Collier County
Growth Management Plan and subsequently removed by the creation of a
new Activity Center via the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master
Plan are recognized as being consistent with this Master Plan.
*R Amended August 4, 1992, Remedial Plan Amendment (Ordinance No.
92-50).
II
GOAL 2:
The County recognizes that Southern Golden Gate Estates
(SGGE). that area which lies south of State Road 84 to U.S.
41, is an area of special environmental sensitivity and
hvdroloGic importance and that restriction of development and
strict regulation of uses is necessary to prevent ~reat harm
to the public health, safetv and welfare. The County shall
develop an interim strategy for Drotectinq its resources.
promotin~ the restoration of SGGE. and assistin~ in the
State's land acquisitio~ and panther recovery e~forts.
Immediately upon adoption of this objective, implement a system
restrictin~ public infrastructure in SgGE.
P~licY 2.1,1:
ExcePt for minimal road maintenance to include traffic signals, riaht-
of-wav mowina and road surface Datchina/~radin~ the County shall limi~
road improvements in the SGGE to placement of an interim surface on
Portions of Berson Boulevard.
Policy 2,~,2:
Consistent with the Public Facilities Element. public s~wer and wat~
facilities shall not be expanded into SGGE.
Policy 2.1.3~
~pectal taxin~ districts associated with infrastructure i~provcment~
shall not be created for or expanded into SGGE.
Amended August 4, 1992, Remedial Plan Amendment (Ordinance No.
92-50). Added new Goal, Objectives and Policies
- 11 -
OBJECTIYE 2.2~
In order to further its uoal, of protecting this area of special
environmental sensitivity, the County will coordinate with DNR in a~
effort to assist the State's acGuisition of privately owned property
within SGGE, to the extent coDsistent with recognition of existing
private property riqhts.
Policy 2.2.1:
The County shall direct inauiries reaardina options for the sale or
donation of land to the state, or other inguiries regardin~
acquisition, to the Florida Department of Natural Resources' fDNR)
Dureau of Land Ac~uisition's desiqnee, as provided bY DNR.
Policy 2.2.2:
The County will support the Florida Department of Community Affairs i~
Bnv effort to include tho SGGE in the Biq Cypress Area of Critical
~te Concern.
Immediately upon adoption of this policy, implement a system for
reviewin~ applicatiQn~ fQr development in SGGE which will include the
followin~ two step procedure:
Step I.: Pre-application Procedure:
A. Notice to DNR, Bureau of Land Acguisition, of th,
application within 5 days of receipt:
B. Notice tO the applicant of DNR's ac~uisitigB pro~ram.
the lack of public infrastructure and the proposed
restoration program for SGGE:
C. Within the notice of DNR's ac~uisition program, th,
applicant shall be encouraged to contact DNRo Bureau of
Land Acquisition to determine and neaotiate whether DNR
intends to Purchase applicant's property at fair market
value:
D. Prior to the processin~ of an application for develop-
ment approval [Step II) the applicant shall mrovide to
the County proof of coordination with DNR. Upon
execution of a contract for sale, the pre-application
shall be placed in abeyance pendin~ completion of the
purchase by DNR:
Step II: Application Review Procedure:
E. The County shall review the environmental impacts of th-
application in order to minimize said impaq~;
- X2 -
e v d - d~
ss A e a State o " w ve:~
s s · a
Attachment
FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES
ZONING REEVALUATION PROGRAM
COMKERCIAL UNDER CRITERIA
NOTE: These maps represent those properties that have been
found consistent with thm Future Land Use Element
through the Zoning Reevaluation Program and through
application of the Commercial Under Criteria provision
of the Future Land Use Element.
R 25 E R 26 E
R 25 E R '26 E I R 27 E
r- :COLLIER' COUNTY, FLORI~
·... .'--~-I- ~ I
,~,.~.~,,I~ r~ MARCO ISLAND INDEX
,'"~M -- I ~ ~.__'~ ~ 'q '
..-- . ~- ~ -, ~.~,~ . -
' ~ '
"~'-- ~25 -' ....z f :~.
/ '4,~:
~ , 2 '~ ~' .' ' .. /%.
222 - '
~ 10 F ........... '
I J r~'~---~,', "' "-"' I~~
I, . t,:~z-~,_~! '"'"L_- ...... I J
C.4; URBAN RESIO~NTIAL
CEX-O25-NH, 2.1 ACREB
C-4; URBAN RESIDENTIAL
EXM--003--NN, 0~44 ACRE~
l c.4; URRAN EX~-OaB-N.. 0.20 ACRES
CUC, 0.3~ ACRE~
0 C-~ ~BAN RES~N~
~ URBAN RE$~N~AL C~, 0.55 ACRES
EXM-OO4-~ 0.1BACRES C-~ ~lAN RE$1~NTIAL
~ ~ s~T ~ CEX-~&N~ [3 ACRES
~ C-4; URBAN RES~NTIAL
~ CEX-O27-N~ 0.3~ ACRE~
C~ 0~0 ACRE~
IC-4; URRAN
CEX-O26-NN. 0.~2 ACREE
[C-~ ~IAH REG~ENTIAL
URIAH RESI~NTIAL j
~43 ACRESJ
· rrrrrrrrr~rr~:l:?'~'~'~'r r'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~l I ~ ¢
:. I. LLLLLLLLI.LLLLLLLLI. I,I.I.I./.~,LLL~.LL!.I.Ft~L/ / ~?
..................................................
URBAN R~SR~NTIAL
CUG, O.OS ACRES
~.~!.'J.I. JJJ.IJ-;q4.LL!JJJ..~ .... ~.1.44-21 -I-I.LLLLIJ:.L1Z1
I~ ~Tt"'il]J?J rl'l'l~ lTrrrrm'rrl'F~rrl'l'rl'lTiTl'l F?~?Y~ .. .
~LU JJJJ.l JJ~-lJ-IJJJ J J-IJ.l~ ~.LLLI..LLIJ.IJ-J.I.¢ISLI.J,.,L.I:I.I}L.~I~j~T3_~~
~ i111'H'Ii.'l_~j~TI TITITI:J'ITFrITI'I'FFI'I'I~'~I'rlTrI'I l'l I l'./-i-rrrrrrrrrrbi"
C-3; LISS&H RESII~HTIAL L
--~-~'~,Li.!,LLL.U.~LLLUJJ.I.~£1 IJ.IJJJJJJJJJJ.L. IJJJJJJJJJJ.
~ ~?~'i~F"'i~i~'~'''':' 'iTl' 'I' 'BI'H'P"'H ---t $-'.v,i.i,i .... ~ -t~.:~~~
~ ~-j-t. LIJJJJ&LU~IJ.IJJJJJJ,~J [$]L-T-LLISLI.I$~LL LLLLLLLLL I
~,, ~'r!'rlTi~'l'riTrriTrrl .... I-rrrl-rrrrrrrl-~rrl'i'l'rl.l:l'l.l.1 -- .... "- ~ ,.,-o-.,,,,
~ .._,,:.-_:~::_,~..~.:,~. ,, ,, _ ............. .' .c,~~~-.,~'.., '....,,,~,.'.,.~
i.LLLLLLi.LL~:~ ,,, lIT .
~'~'FFITI'Fi~ITiT rrtTI '1
1~ *~4~,.~ .1~ C',~ URBAN I~SIO~NTIAL
C:-3; URSAN II~Sll)~NTIAL
EXId-OGIi-HH, 0.1~ ACRES
CEX-O23-HH, 0.1,9 ACRES
U~SAN RE IIO[NTI AL
IKXId*O4II-NN. 0.77 ACRES
°
~ ~ I,~BAN RIr$ID~NTIAL
~ I~xM-OI~-NN, 33,12 ACIIE~
I
d
0.2o
URBAN RESIOENTIAL URBAN RESIOf#TIA~.I
CEX*O17-GG. 0.14 ACRES EXId-OS4-C~ 0.14 ACRESI
~8AN
RES~NT1AL
EX~G~ 0.21 ACR~
C-~ ~BAN R~S~NTIAL , ,
E~2-C~ 0.28 ACRES
i
CEX-Ot2-G~ ~ ACRES
URIAN ~S~NTIAL :-~ ~BAN RES~NTIAL *lin ,.- - I
C~.0.2I AC~ ~X~9-~ 0,~ ACCel
I
CEX~O~ .~ ACRES EX~O41-G~ 0.07 AC~S
C-~ ~BAN RES~HTIA~ ~BAN RE$~HTIAL
C-3; URBAN RES~NTIAL CEX~G~ .~ ACRES C~, 0.21 ACRES . - ...... ?-'~;
CUC. ~37 ACAE~
~BAN RES~NTIAL EXM-O34-G~ 0.14 ACRE~
........ ~ . -~~.'~ I ~=,,'~ ~ ~,~ ,, .,= ,
I
C-S; )J4~IAN R~R:~NTTAL
~,~ I CUC, O.~S ACRER
C-~ ~BAN ~NTI&L
CU~ 0.~ ACRES
~ ~ C-~ ~BAN
;
C~ ~ ACRES
~ ~ C-~ ~BAN RES~NTIAL
EXM-024*G~ 0.23 ACRES
EX~02~G~ ~23 ACRES
~ ~ C-~ ~BAN RE~NTIAL
CEX-0Sg-G~ 0.23 ACRES
/ C-4; ~BAH RES~NTIAL I C-~ ~8AN ~S~NTIAL
CEX-033-G~ 0. T2 ACRES CEX-O~-G~ 0.23 ACRES
C-4;)~BAH RE~NTIAL t~- C-4; ~BAH
EX~hG~ 0.23 ACR[~~ CEX-~I-G~ O.23 ACRES
E Xkl-O34-Ea. 4.89
EXMoOO3-EN. 3,10 ACRI:$
C-4~ U~RAN RESIDENTIAL
EXM-OO?.EN, S.72 ACRES
I
C-4; URBAN RESI~HTIAL EXM-O~-E~ ~3 ACRES C~, LE~ ACRES C~. O.E1 ACRE~
CEX*OI4-E~ O,IT ACRES C~; URBAN RESI~NTIAL
URBAN COASTAL FR~
CEX-OI6-EN. O.17 ACREB
UABAN COASTAL FR~GE
CEX-0~e-E~ 0,e3 ACNE~
I
I
~ ~AN ~N~AL ~$
~ ~ EX~ ~ AC~
C~ ~B~ ~AL
~ ~SAN RE~NTIAL ~
I '
. . .~ .... ~-.
1
~ URBAN COASTAL FlaNGE I
t~ EXM-O4S-EN. 0.17
* C.~.~ URBAN COABTAL FRING~
~._ Gl. lC. 0. S1 ACNE,
/
* C-3~ UNB&N COAilTAL FNING~
·" EXJ4-O44-EN. 0.17 ACI~IE~ /
*i C-3; UNBAN COABTAL FlaNGE
I
CUG. 0J$ ACRES
C-~ UNBAN I~DENTIAL
*Mu ~ M EXM-OO2-EN.
{ l~J~ UIIIBAN C0A~TAL FRINGE
IEXJ4-OI~-EH, 4.00 ACRE~
C-3; IJIIBAN IIESIDEHTIAL
EXM-OO~*EK, 3.73 ACRES
C-3; U~RAN RESiO~NTIAL
'; ~ ' URSAN RESIO,ENTIAL
CL)C, 2.R2 ACAES
C-4; URBAN COASTAl. FBINGS
ExM.O~3olrN. 0.25 ACRE~
~ CEX~E~ 0.47 ACRE~
C-4: ~BAN COASTAL FR~
~ C-~~BAN COASTAL FR~
~ ~ ~BAN COASTAL
~ ~ U~BANCOASTAL FR~GE
C~, 0.30 ACREB
· - IL
RMFi-~ URBAN RIKSIO~HTIAL
EXM*O3G-BH~ O.91 ACREB
~ ~BAN
E~027-~ O.29 ACRES
.x~-o~.-~. o.u. ~Cnl. ~_~-'~
R~-8; ~BAN RES~NTIAL ~-~ ~BAN AES~HTIALIR~-~ ~BAN RESIDENTIAL
CXM-03~ L~ AC~ES CEX~8-~. OB2 ACRES ] EX~O12-SN. O.48 ACRES
___ -- . . ........ / ~ F~----.T.~--~ ..... .
E.MI-OO3~-SH. ',4.S4 ACIII$ ~
RM~-~ ~BAN REI~OENTIAL J
~N~AL
iX~ L74 AC~I I l~ ~83 ACRES
I
; m
C,-4; UIIRAN REISXN11AL
IrXM-041-BN, 1.~ ACI~S
COASTAL FI~I4~ EXM-011-~I4. 0. S7 ACRES
irXI4-02~.~14, 0.72 ACIIE~L C.4~ USBAN I~SO[NTIAL
C'4;~ ~/'1'~ B_~LI~RAN COASTAL FI~ING~-- CEX-OI~-~ 0.Sa' ACI~R
CC 0,~2 Ar..AIEI C.4; ~NIIA#
CLX-0'I~-,~ l. fl ACREI C-4; Ud~IAN
~ ~ ~BAN BES~NTIAL CEX~21~a4. ~S7 ACRES
~ [~M-OOB*8~. 0.2S ACRES C-4; ~IAN RE$10~NTIAL
/I Il¢.4; UdIR&N COASTAL FSmGE CEX~22-~14. O.$7 ACRi$
I J I I I IC;-4; ~BAN COASTAL FRING~ EX~I-020-SN. 1.O, ACRES
h~ · JI'l-q ' 'l'l' J' J lc~ .$A. COASTAL, C~. 0..1
IJ I I I I I I .~lc-,; ~BAN COASTAl. FBN~OE CEX-02S-SN. O.70 ACRES
/-~ J__~__~L~_Lu~L-~ I C~. 1.45 Ar. RED C-~ URBAN COASTAL FRI~IGE
EXM-03S-SN, 0.70 ACRiS
EXI4*OSS*Sl4, 3.73 ACRES
CO~S?JL IrNWiG~ I ~
qUI~IIcIL~ 0,74 ACI~S
AT: ~AN COASTAL FIIINGaE
C-3; U~qBAN COAITAL FRINGE
EXId-00~-~4. 20i~ AG~E~
C-~ UI~AN ¢OABTA~
C~X-OlT-lN, 1.17
C-~ URBAN CO&ITA~. FRING~
C-3~ U~rBAN COAITAL
CEX-OO2-~d. &Ii
EXu.0SB,-&N, SLIB ACIIE8
(:;OAST A~ FI~IH~I
423 ACIIE~ I
G-,,'~ UIIIA#
~ UIIA# COAITAL FRIIC~
~ ~SAH ~OASTAL ~
C~ ~BAH COASTAL
C-41 ~BAH COASTAL
CEX-03~ 2~3~ AC~EI
E~. t30 AC~ES
G-~ URBAN COASTAL
COLLI[R
L~IIS,LN COASTAL RImG~
C~
[ C-~ ~BAN COAST~ F~
C~X-~ ~ AC~ ~BAN COASTAL
~X~2~ ~2S AC~ES
C ~m~ ~ASTAk
CfX~ ~6 ACREI C-3: } I
URBAN COASTA~
C~X-02~
~ =~'~ C-S~ UNIAN COASTAL FRINGE I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~C-~ URBAN COA~TAk F~ I ACRE~
C-~ ~BAN COASTAL FRIN~ ~ =*
LUDED CEX.~7-~ 2.23 ACRE~
C~ ~IAH COASTAL F~ CEX~2I~ o.03 ACNES
C-~ ~IAN COASTAL F~
~ EXM-020-~ 0.~2 ACNES
I
~-~ U~BAN COASTAL
C~. 0.~ ACRE~
I,J~IBAN COASTAL C-~; URBAN COASTAL
CDC, t.~t ACRES EXM-OO1-MI, t. 71 ACRES
I C-~ ~AN COASTAL FRINGE
E~*O47-~ 0. S7 ACRE~
........ I~ ~ [-~' ~ - ~' ~ 7~
I C.4; U~,MI CO-tSTA.L F'I3NG~
EX~7~ O. S7
~ ~BAN COAIT~
l~S~ ~3l A~I ~ ~B~C~ ~COASTALAcRE~FR~GE
~BAN COASTAL
C~
C~ ~lAN COABTAL FR~ CEX-~B~ ~S2 A~l
r. I ,I,~.1,1.1 '1
C-4; URBAN COASTAL
EXM-O~ ~ ACRES
m
URBAN COASTAl,. FRING~
G-~ ~A~ COA~TA~ FRm~ I C.~ U~BAH COASTAL FR~GE
EXM~ ~31 ACRE~ C~, 0.45 ACRE~
[C,,~ U~IAN COASTAL ~ ~RBA# COASTAL
EXu-018-MI, ~37
~AN GOAST~
E~ ~ AC~S
C-~ ~A~ COASTAL ~ ~BAN COASTAL
IC~ ~BAN COASTAL C*~ ~SAN COASTAL
EXM~S~ ~ ACRES
. ~ C-~ ~BAN COASTAL
COABTAL
CEX~ ~41 ACKES
URBAN COASTAL FRH4G~
IrxM.0S4-/d~. '..41, ACRE,S
lC-4; UIIBAN COASTAL FRINGE
Attachment 2
GOLDEN GATE MASTER PLAN
FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES
ZONING REEVALUATION PROGRAM
COM1TERCIAL UNDER CRITERIA
NOTE: These maps represent.those properties that have
found consistent with the Golden Gate Master Pla
through the Zoning Reevaluation Program and thrc
application of the Commercial Under Criteria pro~
of the Master Plan.
EXM-023-GG. 0.14 ACRES
C-2;, URBAN RE$1~NTIAL
~ ~ EXM.041-GG. 0.14 ACRES
~ cuc, o. 43
EXM-OIO-GG. 0.14 ACRES
"
',
~ ~ [ , ~ ~X~-O24-G~ 0.~ ACRES
~ ~ ....... ~ ..... : ....
I
..~ ..~-. ,,.-, .[ ~t ==--
' [[1~~'""" .... ,,.-~ ...... i '--"'" ~'"~" '~0" '~ /='~P~"= :'~ l ~-' ~ =~'~,':~; ~'~;~' ~; ~ ~:~--~ ., ~, .... ~
C-4; URBAN RESIDENTIAL
CEX-O52'GG. 3. Ag ACRES
C.4; URBAH RESIDENTIAL
URBAN RE S~HTIA[
EXM.O4~GG. O.OO ACRES
EX~-O37-GG. 0.38 ACRES
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER )
I, JAMES C. GILES, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentisth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of:
Ordinance No. 92-50
which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on
the 4th day of August, 1992, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commlsstoners of Collier County, Florida, this 7th
day of August, 1992.
JAMES C. GILES ','~%%"~ /9,
Clerk of Courts and (~lel.'k
Ex-offic~o to Board of ' '
County Commission_ers ,.~ "
Deputy Clerk .,',