Ordinance 92-022III IIII IIIIII II II II _ I ........ · ~-
ORDINANCE NO. 92-22 "
TX~LB OF CONTENTS
ARTXCLB !
GENERAL
Section 1.01. Definitions .............. . 2
Section 1.02. Rules of Construction , *
Section 1,03o Findings ...... 9
Section 1.04. Adoption o~ im~a~t'Fee'S[u&¥' : 12
Section 1.05. Supercedes Ordinances 85-55, 85-60 and 90-
14 ................... 13
. ARTXCL~ XI
RO~D XKPACT PEE8
Section 2.01. Imposition ............... 14
Section 2.02. Payment ...... 18
Section 2.03. Alternative Ro;d'lmp&c& ~eA .....
Calculation ............... 19
Section 2.04. Use of Monies .............. 22
ARTXCLB Ill
MZBCZLLANEOUS PRO~XBXONS
Section 3.01. Exemptions
Section 3.02. Changes in Us; &e;e;a~i~g~r'ea%Jr ~x~s;n~l' 28
Trips ............... -.- 28
s ion 3.03. v,,ted Right' ..............
Section 3.04. Affordable Houein9 ......... 31
Section 3.05. A~ternative Collecti~n'Me~ho~ ...... 36
Section 3.06. Developer Contribution Credits ..... 4O
Section 3.07. Review Hearings ........... 5O
Section 3.08. Review Requirement '
Section 3.09. Declaration of Exclusion from
Ad~inistrative Procedures Act ...... 53
Section 3.10. Individua! Calculation of Imgact Fees . . 54
Section 3.1L Severabil~ty .............. 55
Section 3.12. Effective Date ............. 55
ROAD IHPA~ FEE ORDINANCE~ PROVIDING
DEFINITIONS, R~ES OF CONSTRU~ION ~D
FINDINGS ~ A~ING ~ I~A~ FEE STUDY ~
S~CEDING PR~IOUS ORDIN~CES 85-55, 85-60
~D 9~-14~ PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF
ROAD I~A~ ~ES O~ ALL ROAD IHPA~
CON~TRUCTION OCCURRING WITHIN THE
~IH~O~TED ~EA ~D ~E ~ICIPAL
BO~D~IES WITHIN CO~I~ CO~TY~ DEFINING ~E
T~ ROAD IHPA~ CONS~U~ION~ P~I~ING ~
~TE~ATIVE ~TIOH OF ROAD I~A~ FEES~
PROVIDING FOR ~E USE OF ROAD I~A~ FEES
~E~ED~ DEFINING ~D FIXING ~E BO~D~IES
OF ~O~ DIS~I~S~ PROVIDING FOR EX~IONS
~ VESTED RIG.S IN CO~E~ION WI~ ROAD
I~A~ FEES~ PROVIDING FOR THE PAYH~ ~D
~E~ION OF ROAD IHPA~ FEES~ PROVIDING FOR
~ AFFORDABLE HOUSING EX--ION; PROVIDING FOR
~ AFFO~ABLE HOUSING REIHB~S~ PROVIDING
~R ~ ~T~ATIVE CO~E~ION PROC~E ~
PROVIDING ~R ~E I~SITION OF LI~S AGAINST
ROAD I~A~ CONS~U~ION ~E IHPA~ FEES ~E
N~ PAID~ A~HORIZING ~E ~Y ~ ~REC~SE
SU~ LI~S~ PROVIDING FOR ~REC~S~E
PROC~S~ ~WING C~AIN ~EDITS AGAINST
RO~ I~A~ FEES~ PROVIDING FOR R~I~
H~NGS~ REQUIRING ~ R~I~ EX~ING
PROCE~INGS ~OM ~E ADMINIST~TIVE PROCED~E
A~, ~ 120, F~RIDA STA~ES~ PROVIDING
~R S~ILITY~ PROVIDING ~ EFFE~IVE DATE~
~ING A S~ED~E OF RO~ IMPA~ FEES;
DEFINING ~D C~SSI~ING USES OF PROP~TY
S~E~ ~ SU~ I~A~ FEES~ A~ING A
S~ED~ FOR AFFO~ABLE HOUSING.
B~ Z.~ ORDAINED BY THS BOARD OF COUNT¥~COI~IZSSZONER8 OF COLLZ~
~ ~RIDA ~
~T~B X
G~
Section 1.01. DefXnitiono. ~en used in this Ordinance, the
follovinq te~s ahall have the Eollo~nq mean~nqs, unlesa
con~e~ o~e~le clearly re~ires:
"Ao~ess ~prov~ents" shall mean improvements designed and
const~cted to provide safe and ade~ate ingress and egress from
a Road Impact Const~ction, which include, but are not l~mited to,
r~ghts-of-way, easements, pav~ng of adjacent or connec21ng
roadways, ~n lanes, deceleration and acceleration lanes, traffic
con~ol devices, signage and markings, and drainage and
"Aooesso~ Bu~l~ing" shall mean a de2ached, subordinate
Building, ~e use of which ~s clearly ~ndicated and related to the
use of the principal Build~ng or use of ~e land and which
l~ated on ~he same lo2 as the principal Building or use.
"Affor~le Nous~ng" shall mean a ~ell[ng Unit which
off~ for sale or ten2 for an amount w[~n ~e s2andards set
fo~ and es2ablished ~n Appendix C of ~s Ordinance.
"Alte~a~ive Road lmpa~t Fee" shall mean any alternative fee
cal~lat~ by an Applicant and approved by ~e Board pursuant to
Se~on 2.03 or Section 3.07.
"Applioant" shall mean ~e person who applies for a Building
i!~, -~verage ~seeseable Trip Length" shall mean the average
&
" lengths of New Net Trips generated by a development on the
Collector and Arterial road system.
"~oard" shall mean the ~oard of County Commissioners of
.~.=~ Collier County, Florida.
':'~'. "Building~ shall mean any structure, either temporary or
.~: permanent, built for the support, shelter, or enclosure of persons,
chattels, or property of any kind. This term shall include tents,
trailers, mobile homes, or any vehicles serving in any way the
function of a building. This term shall not include temporary
construction sheds or trailers erected to assist in construction
and maintained during the term of a Building Permit.
#Building Permit" shall mean an official document or
,:, certificate issued by ~he City or the County, under the authority
· "'~ of ordinance or law, authorizing the construction or siting of any
Building. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the term "Building
Permit" shall also include tie down permits for thoso structures
or Buildings such as Mobile Homes that do not require a Building
Permit in order to be occupiedt
"CAt2 Street SFs~em" shall mean the road system of a c~ty as
defined in Section 334.03(3), Florida Statutes (1991), or its
statutory successor in function.
#Commercial Xapact Fee Lane Use C&tegory" shall mean the
.. Impact Fee Land Use Categories listed under the commercial heading
..'. in the schedule incorporated in Section 2.01 for Road Impact Fees.
"Comprahaasivs }lan" shall maan the ~omprahansiva Plan of the
County adoptad and amandad pursuant to the Local Govarnmant
Comprehensive Planning and ~nd Development ~e~la~lon ~c~ a~
contain~ in Par~ II, Chapter 163, Florida Sta~u~e~, or
n~atu~o~ nuooe~ao~ in ~uac~ion.
"Co~t~ shall mean Collier County, a political au~lvinion
o~ ~e State of Florida.
"Co~t2 Atto~e2" shall mean ~e Person appointed by ~e Boa~
to se~e as its counsel, or ~e desi~ee of such Person.
~Co~t~ Manaqe~" shall mean ~e ~iaff administrative
of ~e Co~ty, appointed b7 the Board or the designee of such
wCo~ Road Byst~" shall mean ~l road syltem of ~he County
al defined in Section 334.03(7), Florida S~atu~es (1991),
~tatuto~ successor in function.
"~lll~.ng ~it" shall mean a Building, or portion ~ereof,
desired an~ whose prima~ pu~ose la for residential oc~pan~,
conaiak~nq of one or more rooms which are arranged, designed or
u~ aa liv~ng ~a~era for one or more Per.on~.
a~ere~- shall mean monies co~i~ted b2 con~ac~ or
p~a~e order in a manner ~at obligates ~e CountM 2o e~end
encored amount for the delive~ of goods, the rendering of
a~icea or ~e conveyance cE real propertM b2 a vendor, supplier,
~ra~o~ or ~er.
"Xxterm~% Trip" shall mean any Tr.~p which either ham its
~ origins from or its destination to the Road Impact Construction
..... and which impacts the Transportation Network.
"Florida ~ooal ~overnmsnt Development Agreement Aaa" mhall
mean the provisions of S~ction 163.3220 through 163.3243~ Florida
Statutes, aa amended, or its successor in function.
"Impost Fee Rate" shall mean an Impact Fee imposed for a
particular Road Impact Construction under the applicable Impact
:~ Fee Land Use Category established in the schedules incorporated in
~'~]~ Section 2.01.
':~ "Impost Fee Study" shall mean the studies adopted pursuant to
Section 1.04, as amended and supplemented pursuant to Section 3.08.
"Mixed Use Road Impost Construction" shall mean a Road Impact
Construction in which more than one Impact Fee Land Use Category
~s contemplated with each Category constituting a separate end
~dsntifiable enterprise not subordinate to or dependent on other
enterprises within the Road Impact Construction.
"New Net Trip" shall mean the average dally External Trips,
· as adjusted by ~he Impact Fee Study.
':~ "Off-Site Improvements" shall mean road improvements l~catad
-:]: outside of the boundaries of a Road Impact Construction which ars
required by the County in order to serve External Trips, but not
.~ including Access Improvements.
,z, "Owner" shall mean the Person holding legal title to the real
'~ property upon which Road Impact Construction is to occur.
-?srsoa" shall msan an indivi~uel, a co.oration, a
pa~tnsrship~ an incorporated association, or any othsr similar
entity.
"Rssid~mtiel" shall m~a~ ~lti-r~mil~ ~.lling ~i~s,
Con~ominl~s/To~hous~, Mobil~ Bombs, Singl~-~amtl7
House~ o~ Retir~ent Homes.
~oad Zmpa~t Conot~otion" shall mean land cons~c~lon
desired or lntend~ to pe~it a use o~ ~e land which will contain
more ~ell[nq Units, Buildings or ~loor space than the.exist[hq use
o~ land, or to othe~[se change the use of ~he land ~n a manner
~a~ ~ncrease. ~e generation of veh[~lar ~aff~c or ~e n~r
~o~d ~plot Fei" shall mean the fee ~mposed by ~e County
pursuant to Section 2.01 or, [~ applicable, the Alternative Road
Inpact
~o~d ~paot Fee District" shall mean one o~ the eigh~ (8)
dis~icts located wi~in ~e County whi~ are described in Appendix
B to ~io Ordinance.
"S~e Footage~ shall mean ~e ~oss area measured i~ fee~
fr~ ~e e~erior faces of e~erior walls or o~er e~erior
~undaries o~ ~e Building, excluding areas within the interior of
~e Building which are utilized for parking.
"S~te Higher Stst~" shall mean ~ose facilities in ~e
Co~ty am defA~ed by Sectio~ 334.03(21), Florida Statutes (1991),
or itl Ita~uto~ successor in func~ion.
oo,
,,Tr&~sportatfon X~ministrator" shall mean the Person appointed
by the Board or the County Manager to supervise the administration,
operations, and acquisitions of the Transportation Network or the
;' designee of such Person.
-Transpertatio~ Network" shall include, for the purposes of
:l-:: (1) The County Road System, exoluding all local roade~
<,h' (2) All facilities on the State Highway System located within
the County, excluding roads on the interstate eystem~ and
(3) All collector roads within the City Street System,
provided that the improvement of such roads (a) will directly
., . benefit arterial or collector roads within the County, and (b) is
first subject to approval by the County.
"Trip" shall mean a one-way movement of vehicular travel from
an origin (one trip end) to a destination (the other trip end).
The word "Trip" shall have the meaning which it has in commonly
accepted traffic engineering practice.
"Trip Generation or Trip Generator Rate" shall mean the
average daily trip generation rates for the applicable Trip
GenerationLand Use Category, as adjusted by the impact Fee Study.
"Trip Garter&ties Land Uss Category" shall mean the trip
generation land use categories established in the Trip Generation
Report published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in
the current edition on the effective date of this Ordinance or the
most current e~ition on the e~fectlvs da~ of any revisions to the
Z~pact Fee Study.
"Zip Length~ Ihall mean the average daily trip length for the
applicable ~rip Ceneration Land Use Category, as adjusted by the
impact Fee Study.
~ehiole Miles of Travel" or "~" shall mean the average nQw
~avel added to ~he road system by a development, computed by
multiplying ~he New Net ~ips 9enerated by a development by the
Average Assessable ~ip ~ngth.
eeo:ion X.02. Rules o~ Const~otion. For the pu~oses of
a~inistration and enforcemen~ o~ ~his Ordinance, unless o~e~ise
s~ated in~is 0rdinance~ ~e ~ollowinq~les o~ cons~c~lon shall
apply:
A. Xn case of any difference o~ meaning or implication
between ~e ~e~ o2 ~ts Ordinance and any cap~ion, ~llus~a~ton~
s~a~ ~able, or illus~ra~ive ~able, ~he ~ex~ shall con~rol.
B. ~e word ~shall~ is always manda~o~ and no~
discre~lona~ ~e word ~ma2~ ia pe~issive.
C. ~ords used in ~he presen~ ~ense shall include ~he fu~ure~
and wo~a used in~e similar n~r shall include ~he plural and
~e plural ~e similar, unless ~he con~ex~ clearly indicates ~e
con~ra~.
D. ~e p~ase ~used for" includes "arranged for,~ ~des~qned
for~~ ~in~ained for~~ or ~oc~pied for.~
E. ~lems~e con~ex~ clearly indica~es ~he con~rarM, where
a re~la~ion involves ~wo or more ~ems, conditions, provlsions~
o~ events connected by the conjunction "and," "or" or "either . .
· o~,w the conjunction shell be interpreted as follows=
(1) "And" indicates tha{ all the connected terms,
condition,, provisions or events shall apply.
(2) "Or" in~icates that the connected items, uonditione,
proviei~ne or events may apply singly or in any combination.
(3) "Either . or" indicates that the connected
items, conditions, provisions or events shell apply singly
but not in combination.
F. The word "includes" shall not limit a term to the
specific example but ia intended to extend its meaning to all other
instances or circumstances of like kind or character.
G. Where a road right-of-way is used to define Road Impact
Fee District boundaries, that portion of the road right-of-way
demarcating the boundary may be considered ae part of either
district it bounds.
Section 1.03. Plndinge. It is hereby ascertained, determined
and declared~
A. Both existing development and development necessitated
by the growth contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan will require
improvements and additions to the Transportation Network to
accommodate and maintain traffic at the level of service adopted
by the County.
B. Fur=Ts growth, as represented by Road Impact
Construction, should contribute to the cost of improvements and
additions to the Transportation Network required to accommodate
9
traffic generated by such growth ae contemplated in the
Comprehensivs Plan.
C. The required improvements and additions to the
Transportation Network needed to accommodate existing traffic at
~he live1 of service adopted by the County shall be financed by
revenue sources of the County other than Road Impact Face.
--, D. Implementation of a Road Impact Faa structure to require
future Road Impact Construction to contribute the cost of required
transportation capital improvements and additions is an integral
and vital element of the regulatory plan of growth management
l~orporated in the Comprehensive Plan of the County.
E. Future growth as represented by Road Impact Construction
requiring capacity additions to roads within the State Highway
System, the County Road System and the City Street System. The
p~oviding of these growth necessitated capacity additions to the
s~a~J"iShway system and certain portions of the City Street System
directly benefits all residents of the County and is interrelated
with the providing of growth necessitated improvements to the
County Road System. In recognition of these findings and the
interrelation between the various road systems, it is the fntent
of the Board to impose the Road Impact Fee on all Road Impact
Constr~ction occurring within the County and to utilize the
proceeds to construct or acquire contemplated improvements and
capacity additions to the Transportation Network.
F. The Board expressly finds that improvements and additions
to the Transportation Network provide a benefit to all Road Impact
Construction within the County in excess of thy Road Impact Fee.
G. In recognition that transportation planning is an
evolving process, tt is the intent of the Board that improvement~
and additions to the Transportation Hatwork be rsviewld and
adjusted periodically to insure that Road I~pact Fees acs imposed
e~uitably an~! lawfully and ars utilized effectively based upon
actual and anticipated growth needs at the time of t/~eir
H. The C~unty has a responsibility to provide and maintain
all roads on the County Road System in Collier County in both the
unincorporated areas as well as the incorporated areas. Road
l~pact Construction occurring within incorporated areas impacts
upon the County Road System and State Highway System within Collier
County. Placing a fair share of the burden of the cost of
providing the improvements and additions to the Transportation
Network required by Road Impact Construction within incorporated
areas constitutes a county purpose. In recognition of these
findings, it ia the intent of the Board to impose the Road Impact
Fee on all Road Impact Construction occurring within the County,
including areas within municipal boundaries.
I. The purpose of this Ordinance is to require the Road
Impact Construction within the County to provide for capital
~provemsnte and additions to the Transportation Network which are
necessitated by such Road Impact Construction. This Ordinance
11
,oo, 052,, 13'
shall not be construed to permi~ the co11~ction of Impact Fees from
Road Impact Construction in excess of the amount reasonably
anticipated to offset the demand on the Transportation Network
generated by such Ro~d Impact Construction.
J. This Ordinance sha) l not be con~trued to permit the
expending or encumbering of any monies collected through Road
Impact Fees for the construction of improvements or additions to
roads which are not contained within the Transportation Network.
Section 1.04. Adoption of Impact Fee Study.
A. The Board hereby adopts and incorporates by reference,
the study entitled "Collier County Transportation Impact Fee - 1991
Update Study," prepared by Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc. and
dated April 1992, particularly the assumptions, conclusions and
findings in ~uch study as to the impact upon the County Road System
and allocation of anticipated costs of capital improvements and
additions to the Transportation Network between those costs
required to accommodate existing traffic and those costs required
to accommodate traffic generated by growth contemplated in the
Comprehensive Plan.
B. In adopting the Impact Fee Study identified in Subsection
A of this Section, the Board has made the public policy decision
to require that growth or new development, as represented by Road
Impact Construction, fund improvements necessary to maintain the
systemwide level of service on ~he Transportation Network.
8sGtion 1o05. 8upsroedss Ordinanos~ 85-55, 85-60 and 90-14o
The te~ms and provisions of th£s O~d~nance shall supercede the
provisions of Ordinances 85-55, 85-60 and 90-14, aL amended. In
the event of a conflict between the provisions of Ordinances 85-
55, 85-60 and 90-14, aL amended, and this Ordinance, the provisions
of this Ordinance shall control.
13
ARTICLE II
ROAD IMPACT FEES
Ssotion 2.01. Imposition. The Applicant for any Road Impact
Construution occurring within Collier Count}., both w~thin the
unincorporated area and within the municipal boundaries, shall pay
the Road Impact Fees established in this Ordinance.
A. Road Impact Fee District Number 1 is hereby created to
include the boundaries set forth and established as described and
depicted in Appendix B, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Road Impact Fee District Number I shall include all
areas previously included within District Numbers 1 and 2 created
by Ordinance 85-5!5, as amended. The Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule
incorporated in Appendix A is hereby adopted and the Road Impact
Fees established in the Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule are h~reby
imposed on all Road Impact Construction located within Road Impact
Fee District Number i at a rate established under the applicable
Impact Fee Land Use Categories.
B. Road Impact Fee District Number 2 is hereby created to
include the boundaries set forth and established as described and
depicted in Appendix B, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Road Impact Fee District Number 2 shall include all
areas previously included within District Numbers 3 and 5 created
by Ordinance 85-55, as amended. The Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule
incorporated in Appendix A is hereby adopted and the Road Impact
Fees established in such Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule are h~reby
imposed on all Road Impact Construction located within Road Impact
Fee District Number 2 at a rate establisi%ed under the applicable
impact Fee Land Use Categories.
C. Road Impact Fee District Number 3 is hereby craated to
include the boundarius set forth and established as demcribed and
depicted in Appendix B, attached h.reto and incorpoLat-d by
reference. Rcad Impact Fee District Number 3 shall include all
areas previous, ly included within District Number 4 created by
Ordinance 85-55, as amended. The Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule
incorporated in Appendix A is hereby adopted and the Road Impact
Fees established in such Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule are hereby
imposed on all Road Impact Construction located within Road Impact
Fee District Number 3 at a rate established under the applicable
Impact Fee Land Use Categories.
D. Road Impact Fee District Number 4 is hereby created to
include th(~ boundaries set forth and established as described and
depicted in Appendix B, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Read Impact Fee District Number 4 shall include all
areas previously included within District Number 6 created by
Ordinance 85-55, as amended. The Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule
incorporated in Appendix A is hereby adopted and the Road Impact
Fees established in such Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule are hereby
imposed on all Road Impact Construction located within Road Impact
Fee District Number 4 at a rate established under the applicable
Impact Fee Land Use Categories.
E. Road Impact Fee District Number 5 is hereby created to
include the boundaries set forth and established as described and
15
depicted in Appendix B, attached hersao and incorporated by
reference. Road Impact Fee District ~, ~ber 5 shall include all
arua~ previously included within Dist~-.ut Number 9 created by
Ordinance 85-55, a~ amel~ded. The Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule
incorporated in Appondix A is he£eby a=uptcd end the Road Impact
Fees established in such Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule are hereby
imposed on all Road Impact Construction located within Road Impact
Fee District Number 5 at a rate established under the applicable
Impact Fee Land Use Categories.
F. Road Impact Fee District Number 6 is hereby created to
include the boundaries set forth and established as described and
depicted in Appendix B, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Road Impact Fee District Number 6 shall include all
areas previously included within District Number 8 created by
Ordinance 85-55, as amended. The Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule
incorporated in Appendix A is hereby adopted and the Road Impact
Fees established in such Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule are hereby
imposed on all Road Impact Construction located within Road Impact
Fee District Number 6 at a rate established under the applicable
Impact Fee Land Use Categories.
G. Road Impact Fee District Number 7 is hereby created to
include the boundaries set forth and established as described and
depicted in Appendix B, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Road Impact Fee District Number 7 shall include all
areas previously included within District Number 11 created by
Ordinance 85-55, as amended. No Road Impact Fee shall be initially
16
imposed upon Road Impact Construction lo~ated within Road Impact
Fee District Number 7.
H. Road Impact Fee District Number 8 iN hereby created to
include the boundaries set forth and established as described and
depicted in Appendix D, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Road Impact Fee District Number 8 shall include all
areas previously included within District Numbers 7 and 10 created
by Ordinance 85-55, as amended. No Road Impact Fee shall be
initially imposed upon Road Impact Construction located within Read
Impact Fee District Number 8.
I. The Road Impact Fee shall provide funds only for Off-
Site Improvements to roads within the Transportation Network within
the Road Impact Fee District where the Road Impact Construction is
located. Except that where a growth necessitated improvement or
addition is to be constructed to a portion of an arterial road
within a single Road Impact Fee District and that the arterial road
to be improved extends into other Road Impact Fee Districts, Road
Impact Fees from either Road Impact Fee District may be us~ld,
provided:
(1) that the improvement to be made will directly
benefit Road Impact Construction in any Road Impact Fee
District from which Road Impact Fees will be utilized; and
(2) that the expenditure of Road Impact Fees from the
respective Road Impact Fee Districts is proportional to the
benefit derived by Road Impact Construction within the
District.
17
~' Prior to the expenditure of Road Impact Fees for a capital
improvement or addition located in a Road Impact Fee District other
than where the Impact Fees were derived, a professional engineer
shall provide a specific determination of benefit and demonutrats
:.. compliance with thc r~quJremento of this Seution for the proposed
.? expenditure. The Board shall approvc the expenditure of Road
Impact Fees in a Road Impact Fee District other than from where the
Impact Fees were derived and shall support the approval by a
specific inding of benefit.
J. Access Improvements, including required right-of-way
dedications, shall be provided by the Applicant in accordance with
all other applicable ordinances of the County.
Section 2.02. Payment.
A. Except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance, the Road
~:. Impact Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit
~.,~ for any Road Impact Construction occurring within the
>~.-. unincorporated area or within the municipal boundaries of Collier
~r~: county
~'; (1) In the event the Road Impact Construction is located
~: within the unincorporated area of the County, the Road Impact
~' Fee shall be paid to the County prior to the issuance of the
Building Permit by the County.
?,' (2) In the event the Road Impact construction is located
within the boundaries of a municipality, the Road Impact Fee
' ,' shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of a Building
.. Permit by the City.
B. In the event the County or the City issues separate
Building P(~rmits for a Building or part o~ a Building within a Road
Impact Construction which by design contemplates phased occupancy,
the Board and the Applicant may enter into an agreement for the
phased pa~ent of the Impact Fee applicable to that portion of the
Road Impac~ Construction rcpre~ontud by such Building, pro¥ided,
however, that all Impact Fees due shall be paid in full prior to
issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy for final occupancy
of any portion of the Building. In the event no agreement is
executed for such phased occupancy, the Impact Fees applicable to
that portion of the Road Impact Construction represented by such
Building shall be paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit
resulting in the generation of External Trips under the intended
building use.
C. The payment of the Road Impact Fee shall be in addition
to any other fees, charges or assessments of the County or th~ City
due for the issuance of a Building Permit.
D. The obligation for payment of the Road Impact Fee shall
run with the land.
seot~on Z.0~. Alternative Road Impaot Fee Calcul&tion.
A. In the event Applicant believes that the impact to
an
the Transportation Network necessitated by its Road Impact
Construction is less than the fee established in Section 2.01 or
that the Road Impact Construction produces less External Trips than
assumed under the applicable Impact Fee Land Use Category specified
in the applicable Impact Fee Study, such Applicant may, prior to
issuance of a Building Permit for such Road Impact Construction,
submit the calculation of the Alternative Road Impact Fee to the
County Manager. Upon receipt of a request for an Alternative Road
Impact Fee, the County Manager shall schedule a hearing before the
Board at a regularly scheduled meeting or a ~puc[al meeting called
for the purpose o~ reviewing the proposed Alternative Road Impact
Fee and sh~ll provide the Applicant written notice of the tine and
place of the hearing. Such hearing shall be held within thirty
(30) days of the date the Alternative Road Impact Feu reque~t was
submitted.
B. Fo~' purposes of any Alternative Road Impact Fee
calculation, the Road Impact Construction shall be presumed to have
the maximum impact on the Transportation Network for the Trip
Generation Land Use Category contemplated under the Impact Fe(~ Rate
Schedule.
C. The Alternative Road Impact Fee calculations shall be
based on data, information, assumptions and the methodology
contained in this Ordinance and ~he Impact Fee Study, or an
independent source, provided that:
(1) The independent source is a generally accepted
standard source of transportation engineering or planning or
information.
(2) The independent source is a local study supported
by a data base adequate for the conclusions contained in such
study performed by a professional engineer pursuant to the
methodology contained within th,a Impact Fee Study.
(3) If' a previously approved Road Impact Construction
!'~ project submitted, during it~ approval process, a traffic
impact study substantially c~nsistent with the criteria
~ . required by this Section, and if such study is determined by
.~,~ .' the Board to be current, the traffic impacts of such
~',. previously approved Road Impact Construction shall be presumed
'~ to be as described in the prior study. 'n such circumstances,
an.Alternative Road Impact Fee shall be established reflecting
the traffic impact described in the prior study. There shall
b. a rebuttable presumption that a traffic impact study
conducted more than two years earlier is invalid.
(4) It is acknowledged that the Impact Fee Rates are
ii based upon the applicable Vehicle Miles of Travel for the Trip
Generation Land Use Categories corresponding to the Impact Fee
~ Land Use Categories set forth in Appendix A. In recognition
!i! of such acknowledgement, the Vehicle Miles of Travel for the
Trip Generation Land Use Categories shall be considered an
~'~ independent source for the purposes of the calculation of an
~ Alternative Road Impact Fee calculation without the necessity
~:~ of a study as required by Subsection C(2) of this Section.
i> D. If the Board determines that the data, information and
~, assumptions utilized by th~ Applicant complies with the
'~ requirements of this Section and that the calculation of the
Alternative Road Impact Fee was in conformance with the methodology
23'
contained within the Impact Fee Study, then the Altornative Road
Impact Fee shall be paid in lieu of the fee set forth in Section
2.01.
~. If the Board determines that the data, tn£ormatiun and
assumptions utilized by the Applicant do not comply with the
requirements of this Section or that the calculation of the
Alternative Road Impact Fee was not by the methodology contained
within the Impact Fee Study, then the Board shall provide to the
Applicant by certified mail, return receipt requested, written
notification of the rejection of the Alternative Road Impact Fee
and the reason th(]refor. The decision of the Board shall be
writing and issu,d within ten (10) working days of the review.
F. Any Applicant or Owner who has submitted a propo~ed
Alternative Road Impact Fee pursuant to this Section and desires
the immediate issuance of a Building Permit shall pay prior to or
at the time the proposed Alternative Road Impact Fee is submitted
the applicable Road Impact Fee pursuant to Section 2.02. Said
payment shall be deemed paid under "Protest" and shall not be
construed as a waiver of any right of review. Any difference
between the amount paid and the amount due, as determined by the
Board, shall be refunded to the Applicant or Owner.
Section 2.04. Use of Monies.
A. The Board of County Commissioners hereby establishes
eight (8) separate trust accounts for the Road Impact Fees, to be
designated as the "District Number 1 Road Impact Fee Trust
Account," "District Number 2 Road Impact Fee Trust Account,"
22
.District Number 3 Road Impact Fee Trust Account," "District Number
4 Road Impact Fee Trust Account," "District Number 5 Road Impact
Fee Trust Account," "District Number $ Road Impact Fee Trust
Account," "District Number 7 Road Impact F~e Trust Account," and
"District Number 8 Road Impact Fee Trust Account," which accounts
shall be maintained separate and apart from all other accounts of
the County. Ail Road Impact Fees shall be deposited into the
appropriate trust account immediately upon receipt.
B. Impact Fees collected under the provisions of Ordinance
85-55, as amended, and which have not been expended prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance shall be allocated as follows:
(1) Impact Fees collected within District Numbers I and
2 under Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be deposited in the
District Number 1 Road Impact Fee Trust Account.
(2) Impact Fees collected within District Numbers 3 and
5 under Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be deposited in the
District Number 2 Road Impact Fee Trust Account.
(3) Impact Fees collected within District Number 4 under
Ordinance $5-55, as amended, shall be deposited i~ the
District Number 3 Road Impact Fee Trust Account.
(4) Impact Fees collected within District Number 6 under
Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be deposited in the
District Number 4 Road Impact Fes Trust Account.
(5) Impact Fees collected within District Number 9 under
Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be deposited in the
District Number 5 Road Impact Fee Trust Account.
23
25
(6) ImDact Fees collected within District Number 8 under
Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be deposited in the
District Number 6 Road Impact Faa Trust Account.
(7) Impact Fees collect{~d within District Number 11
under Ordinance $5-55, as amended, shall be deposited in the
District Number ? Road I~pact Fee Trust Account.
{8) Impact Fees collected within District Numbers 7 and
10 under Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be deposited in
the District Number 8 Road Impact Fee Trust Account.
C. The monies deposited into the respective Road Impact Fee
Trust Accounts shall be used solely for the purpose of constructing
or improving roads within the Transportation Network and, except
as otherwise provided, shall bo expended within that Road District
where the Road Impact Construction is located. Road Impact Fees
may be used for the following purposes, including, but not limited
to:
(1) design and construction plan preparation;
(2) permitting;
(3) right-of-way acquisition, including costs of
acquisition or condemnation;
(4) construction of new through lanes;
(5) construction of new turn lanes;
(6) construction of new bridges;
(7) construction Of new drainage facilities in
conjunction with new roadway construction;
(8) purchase and installation of new traffic
signalization;
(9) construction of new curbs, medians and shoulders;
(10) relocating utilities to accommodate new roadway
construction;
(11) construction management and inspection;
(12) surveying and soils and material testing;
(13) to the extent allowable by law, reimbursement or
refund of costs incurred by the County in preparation of this
Ordinance, including any amendments or supplements, and the
Impact Fee Study adopted pursuant to Section 1.04 and any
amendments or supplements adopted pursuant to Section 3 08;
(14) repaymen% of monies transferred or borrowed from
any budgetary fund of the County which were used to fund any
growth impacted construction or improvements as herein
defined; and
(15) payment of principal and interest, necessary
reserves and costs of issuance under any bonds or other
indebtedness issued by the County to provide funds to
construct or acquire growth impacted capital transportation
improvements on the Transportation Network.
Funds on deposit in the respective Road Impact Fee Trust Accounts
shall not be used for any expenditure that would be classified as
25
,oo 052, , 27
a maintenance or repair expense, nor shall they be u=ed on local
roads or on interstate highways.
D. Th~ monies deposited into the resp,ctive Road Impact Fee
Trust Accounts shall be used solely to provide additions and
improvements to the Transportation Network r,quired to accommodate
traffic generated by growth.
E. Any monies on deposit which are not immediately necessary
for expenditure shall be invested by the County. All income
derived from such investments shall be deposited in the respective
Road Impact Fee Trust Accounts and used as provided herein.
F. The Road Impact Fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance
may be returned to the then current Owner of the property on behalf
of which such fee was paid if such fees have not been expended or
Encumbered prior to the end of the fiscal year immediately
following the sixth (6th) anniversary of the date upon which such
fees were paid. Refunds shall be made only in accordance with the
following procedure:
(1) The then current Owner shall petition the Board for
the refund prior to the end of the fiscal year following the
end of the fiscal year in which occurs the date of the sixth
(6th) anniversary of the payment of the Road Impact Fee.
(2) The petition for refund shall be submitted to the
County Manager and shall contain:
(a) A notarized sworn statement that the petitioner
is the then current Owner of the property on behalf of
which the Road Impact Fee was paid;
26
(b) A copy of the dated receipt issued for payment
of such fee, or such other record as would indicate
payment of such fee;
(c) A certified cnpy of the latezt recorded d~ed;
and;
(d} A copy of the most recent ed valorem tax bill.
(3) Within three (3) months from the date of receipt of
a petition for refund, the County Manager will advise the
petitioner of the status of the Road Impact Fee requested for
refund, and if such Road Impact Fee has not been spent or
Encumbered within the applicable time period, then it shall
be returned to the Petitioner. For the purposes of this
Section, fees collected ~hall be deemed to be spent or
Encumbered on the basis of the first fee in shall be the first
fee out.
ARTICLE III
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 3.01. Exemptions. The following shall bo exempted
from payment of the Road Impact F~es:
A. Alterations, expansion or replacement of un mwisting
Dwelling Unit which does not increase the number of ~amllies which
such Dwelling Unit is arranged, designed or intended to accommodate
for the purpose of providing living quarters.
B. The alteration or expansion of a Building if the Building
use upon completion does not generate greater External Trips under
the applicable Impact Fee Rate.
C. The replacement of a Building or the construction of an
Accessory Building if the replacement Building or Accessory
Building does not result in a ].and use genorating greater External
Trips under the applicable Impact Fee Rate.
D. Mobile home lots or spaces upon which the applicable Road
Impact Fee has previously been paid.
Se¢~tion 3.0Z. Changes in Use ~snerating ~reatar External
Impact Fees shall be imposed and calculated for the
~.. alteration, expansion or replacement of a Building or Dwelling Unit
i~! . or the construction of an Accessory Building if the alteration,
expansion or replacement of the Building or Dwelling Unit or the
construction of an Accessory Building results in a land use
determined to generate greater External Trips than the present use
under the applicable Impact Fe~ Rate. The Impact Fee imposed under
the applicable Impact Fee Rate shall be calculated as follows:
~ 28
A. If the Impact Fees are calculated on land use and not
mquare footage, the Impact Fe.3s imposed shall be the Impact Fees
due und(Jr the applicable Impact Fe(~ Rate for the Impact Fee Land
Use Category resulting from the alteration, exDansion or
replacement less the Impact Fee that would be imposed undQr the
applicable Impact Fee Rate for the Impact Fee Land U~e Category
prior to the alteration, expansion or replacement.
B. In the event the square footage of an Office Building or
Retail Building as defined in Appendix A is increased, the Impact
Fee Rate for the increased square footage represented by the Road
Impact Construction shall be at the Impact Fee Rate applicable to
Road Impact Construction with square footage equal to the existing
square footage plus the contemplated increased square footage.
C. The Impact Fee imposed for any Accessory Buildings shall
be that applicable under the Impact Fee Rate for the land use for
the primary Building.
Seo~ion 3.03. Vested Rights.
A. Any Owner of a Road Impact Construction which was the
subject of a development order, of the County prior to October 1,
1985, may petition for a vest~d rights determination which 'would
exempt the Owner from the provisions of this Ordinance. Such
petition shall be filed with the County Manager and a copy filed
with the County Attorney. The County Attorney shall review the
petition and shall make a written determination as to whether such
vested right should exempt the Owner from the provisions of this
29
31
Ordinance. The determination of the Country Attorney shall be based
on the following criteria:
(1) The existence of a valid, unexpired governmental act
of the County authorizing the specific development ~or which
a determination is sought;
(2) Expenditure~ or obligations made or incurred in
reliance upon the authorizing governmental act that are
reasonably equivalent to offsetting the impact on the
Transportation N~twork by the development as required by this
Ordinance;
(3) Other factors that demonstrate it is inequitable to
deny the Owner the opportunity to complete the previously
approved development under the conditions of approva~ by
requiring the Owner to comply with the requirements of this
Ordinance. For the purposes of this paragraph, the following
factors shall be considered in determining whether it is
inequitable to deny the Owner the opportunity to complete the
previously approved deveXopment:
(a) Whether the injury suffered by the Owner
outweighs the public cost of allowing the development to
go forward without payment of the Road Impact Fee
requi£ed by this Ordinance; and
(b) Whether the expenses or obligations to offset
the road impact for the development were made or incurred
subsequent or prior to October 1, 1985.
30
B. The County Attorney ~hall make a written determination
on the petition for vested rights, a copy of which shall be
provided to the Owner by cQrtified mail, return receipt requested.
:. A copy of the written determination shall also be provided to the
County Manager. An Owner shall have thirty (30) calenda~ days from
the receipt of the writtcn decision on vestod rights to request a
hearing pursuant to Section 3.07.
~"' Section 3.04. Affordable ~ousing.
~ ~' A. The County shall exempt from the payment of the Road
~(. Impact Fee any Residential Road Impact Construction which qualifies
as Affordable Housing and which the construction of such Road
~9' Impact Construction is funded in whole or in part by money received
i pursuant to a direct grant or subsidy from the United States,
~ Department of Housing and Urban Development, or from any direct
i~' grant or subsidy ~,rogram of the State or County created to assist
'~ in the construction of Affordable Housing.
? (1) Any Person seeking an Affordable Housing Exemption
%: for a propos~d Road Impact Construction shall file with the
"~': County Manager an Applicat~on for Exemption prior to receiving
~:.. a Building Permit for the proposed Road Impact Constru6tion.
The Application for Exemption shall contain the following:
~ (a) The name and address of the Owner;
(b) The legal description of the Residential
.' Property upon which the Road Impa~t Construction shall
~. be constructed;
(c) The nature of the' governmental grant or
~3ubsidy, including any terms, restrictions or conditions
as to i~s use;
(d) Documentation evidencing finalization of
approval for the governmental gr,nt ur ~ubsidy;
(e) Proposed use of the governmental grant or
(f) The proposed selling price if the Road Impact
Construction will be offered for sale or the proposed
rental price if the Road Impact Construction will be
offered for rent; and
(g) The number of bedrooms which the Road Impact
Construction will contain.
(2) If the proposed Road Impact Construction meets the
requirements for an Affordable Housing Exemption, then the
County Manager shall issue an Impact Fee Exemption. The
Impact Fee Exemption shall b(i presented in lieu of payment of
the Road Impact Fee.
B. The County shall reimburse to the Applicant the Road
Impact Fee paid for any Road Impac~ Construction which will be sold
or rented for an amount which qualifies as Affordable Housing.
(1) Any Applicant seeking a reimbursement of the Road
Impact Fee for a proposed Road Impact Construction shall file
with the County Manager an Ap])lication for Reimbursement prior
to receiving a Building Permit for the proposed Road Impact
Construction. The Application for Reimbursement shall contain
the following:
(a) Th~ name and address of the Owner;
(b) The legal description of the Residential
P£opurty upon which the Road Impact Construction shall
be constructed;
(c) The proposed selling price if the Road Impact
Construction will be offered for sale or the proposed
rental price if the Road Impact Construction will be
offered for rent; and
(d) The number of bedrooms which the Road Impact
Construction will contain.
(2) If the proposed Road Impact Construction meets the
preliminary requirements for an Affordable Housing
Reimbursement, then the County Manager shall issue an
Authorization for Reimbursement to the Applicant for the
proposed Road Impact Construction.
(3) The Applicant for the Road Impact Construction who
has received an Authorization for Reimbursement shall pay the
Road Impact Fee due pursuant to Section 2.02 of this
Ordinance.
(4) If the Road Impact Construction is being offered for
sale, the Applicant may obtain a reimbursement of thu Road
Impact Fee by presenting the Authorization for Reimbursement
and documentation indicating the actual selling price of the
Road Impact Construction to the County Manager. Such
33
documentation shall be submitted wi.thin ninety (90) days of
the sale of the Road Impact Construction. Failure to submit
such documentation within the time rsquired shall be deemed
a waiver of the right to reimbursement. After revi,wing the
documentation provid,d and dutermining that the requirements
fo:' an Affordable Housing Reimbursement have been satisfied,
the County shall reimburse the Road Impact Fee to the
Applicant.
(5) If the Road Impact Construction will be offered for
rent, the Applicant may obtain a reimbursement of the Road
Impact Fee by presenting to the County Manager the
Authorization for Reimbursement and documentation indicating
the total monthly rental received for the immediate past
calendar year, or for that portion of the initial calendar
year for which the Road Impact Construction is rented. Such
.~.~documentation shall be submitted within ninety (90) days of
.... the' ~nd of the calendar year. Failure to submit such
'*'documentation within the time required shall be deemed a
~waiver of the right to reimbursement. After reviewing the
~documentation and determining that the requirements for an
Affordable Housing Reimbursement have been satisfied, the
County to the Applicant an amount equal to
shall
reimburse
one-seventh (1/7) of the ~oad Impact Fee paid.
(6) Such annual reimbursements may be received for seven
.consecutive years. Failure to timely apply for reimbursement
in any year or the failure to provide documentation that the
34
total monthly rental received per Dwelling Unit for the entire
calendar year was within the limits established shall waive
the Applicant's right to reimbursement for that Dwelling Unit
in that and any subsequent year.
(7) The reimbursement of thQ Road Impact F-s shall be
paid by the County within thirty (30) days of submission of
the Authorization for Reimbursement and proper documentation
indicating the sales price or the total monthly rental for the
immediate past calendar year. The County shall pay such
reimbursement from the accumulated Road Impact Fees collected
pursuant to Section 2.02.
(8) The right to reimbursement shall be only available
to the Applicant as stated on the Application for
Reimbursement and may not be transferred, sold or assigned to
any other Person.
C. For a Road Impact Construction to receive an Affordable
Housing Exemption or Affordable Housing Reimbursement, the amount
for which the Road Impact Construction may be sold or rented must
be restricted to an amount within the standards contained on
Appendix C and that such restriction must continue for a period of
at least seven years from the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy. Such restrictions must be contained within the deed for
the Road Impact Construction, within the provisions of a contract
entered into between the County and both the Applicant and the
Owner of the Road Impact Construction, or by the terms of a
Development Agreement entered into pursuant to the Florida Local
35
Government Development Agreement Act. No Affordable Housing
Exemption nor Affordable Housing Reimburs~ment shall be granted for
a Road Impact Construction which consists of a Mobile Home.
D. In determining the total monthly rental charge for the
purpose of determining eligibility for an Impact Fen Excmption or
Authorization for Reimbursement, all pa~ents which are requirod
to be made by a tenant as a condition of residing at such Dwelling
Unit shall be included.
.E. For each Road Impact Construction which receives an
Impact Fee Exemption or Authorization for Reimbursement, the County
shall pay into the respective Road Impact Fee Trust Account, from
sources other than Impact Fees, the amount of the Road Impact Fee
which was exempted.
F. An Applicant who has been denied an Impact Fee Exemption
or Authorization for Reimbursement may request a review hearing on
such decision pursuant to Section 3.07.
Seetion 3.05. Alternative Collection Method.
In the event the appropriate Road Impact Fee is not paid prior
to the issuance of a Building Permit, the County shall proceed to
collect the appropriate Road Impact Fee as follows:
A. If the Road Impact Construction has not received a
Certificate of Occupancy, it shall pay the requisite Road Impact
Fee prior to the issuance of the Certificate.
~. If a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, the County
shall serve by certified mail, return receipt requested, a Notice
of Impact Fee Statement upon the Applicant at the address set forth
'~'~ in the ap]31ication for Building PermiJ, ~nd the Owner at the
· ' addrmss appearing on the most recent records maintained by the
~: Property Appraiser of the County. Service of the Notice of Impact
Fee 'Statem~nt ~hal] bo notice of the Impact Fees due and service
shall be deemed effective on the date t~ return receipt indicate,
the notice was received by either the Applicant or the Owner,
whichever occurs first. The Notice of Impact Fee Statement ~hall
contain the legal description of the property and shall advise the
;7-:: Applicant and the Owner as follows:
~'. (1) The amount due and the general purpose for which
?~ the Road Impact Fee was imposed;
~ (2) That a hearing pursuant to Section 3.07 may be
requested within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of
.~ service of the Notice of Impact Fee Statement, by making
~' ' application to the County Manager.
(3) That the Road Impact Fee shall be delinquent if not
:~' paid and received by the County within thirty (30) calendar
'" days of the date the Notice of Impact Fee Statement is
received, excluding the date of receipt or if a hearing ~s not
requested pursuant to Section 3.07, and, upon becoming
delinquent, shall be subject to the imposition of a delinquent
i fee and interest on the unpaid amount until paid;
(4) That in the event the Road Impact Fee becomes
delinquent, a lien against the property for which the Building
Permit was secured shall be recorded in the Official Records
Book of the County.
37
C. The Road Impact Fee shall be delinquent if, within thirty
(30) calendar days from the date of the receipt of the Notice of
Impact Fee Statement by either the Applicant or the Owner, ne:Lther
the Impact Fees have been paid and rcceived by the county, nor a
hearing requested pursuant to Sec=Ion 3.07. In the event a hearing
is requested pursuant to Section 3.07, the Impact Fees shall b~come
delinquent if not paid within thirty (30) calendar days from the
date the Board determines the amount of Impact Fees due upon the
conclusion of such hearing. Said time periods shall be calculated
on a calendar day basis, including Sundays and legal holidays, but
excluding the date of the earliest receipt of said Notice of Impact
Fee Statement or the date of the determination by the Board in the
event of an appeal. In the event: the last day falls on a Sunday
or legal holiday, the last due d~te prior to becoming delinquent
shall be the next business day. Upon becoming delinquent, a
delinquency fee equal to 10% of the total Impact Fees imposed shall
be assessed. Such total Impact Fees, p)us delinquency fee, shall
bear interest at the statutory rate for final Judgments calculated
on a calendar day basis, until paid.
D. Should the Road Impact Fee become delinquent as set forth
in Subsection B, the County shall serve by certified mail return
receipt requested, a "Notice of Lien" upon the delinquent Applicant
at the address indicated in the application for the Building
Permit, and upon the delinquent Owner at the address appearing on
th~ most recent records maintained by the Property Appraiser of the
County. The Notice of Lien shall notify the delinquent Applicant
38
and Owner that due to their failure to p~y the Road Impact Fees,
the County shall file a Claim of Lien with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court.
E. Upon mailing o~ the Notice of Lien, the County Attorney
shall file a Claim o~ Lien with the Cl.:rk of tho Circuit Court for
recording in the Official Records of the County. The Claim of Lien
shall contain the legal description of the property, the amount of
the delinquent Impact Fees and the date of their imposition. Once
recorded, the Claim of Lien shall constitute a lien against the
property described therein. The County shall proceed expeditiously
to collect:, foreclose or otherwise enforce said lien.
~F. After the expiration of one year from the date of
recording of the Claim of Lien, as provided herein, a suit may be
filed to foreclose said lien. Such foreclosure proceedings shall
be instituted, conducted and enforced in conformity with the
procedure~ for the foreclosure of municipal special assessment
lien~, as set forth in Chapter 173, Florida Statutes, which
prov~sion~ are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety to the
same extent as if such provisions were set forth herein verbatim.
G. The liens for delinquent Impact Fees imposed hereunder
shall remain liens, coequal with the lien of all state, county,
district and municipal taxes, superior in dignity to all other
subsequently filed liens and claims, until paid as provided herein.
H. The collection and enforcement procedures set forth in
this Section shall be cumulative with, supplemental to and in
addition to, any applicable procedures provided in any other
39
ordinances or administrative regulations of the County or any
applicable law or administrative regulation of the State of
Florida. Failure of the County to follow the procedure set forth
in this Section shall not constitute a waiver of its rights to
proceed under any other ordinances or administrative regulations
of the County or any applicable law nr administrative regulation
of the State of Florida.
8eotion 3.06. Developer Contribution Credits.
A. A credit shall be granted against the Road Impact Fee
imposed by Section 2.01 for certain donations of land or for the
contribution of Off-Site Improvements to the Transportation Network
required to be made pursuant to a development order by the County
or voluntarily made in connection with Road Impact Construction.
SUch donations or contributions shall be subject to the following
standards:
(1) The donated land shall be an integral part of and
a necessary accommodation of contemplated Off-Site
Improvements to the Transportation Network;
(2) The Off-Site Improvements to be contributed shall
be an integral part of and a necessary accommodation to the
iTransportation Network and shall exclude Access Improvements;
(3) Except as provided in Subsection A(1) and (2) of
this Section, no other donations of land or contributions of
Off-Site Improvements shall be entitled to developer
· contribution credit from the Road Impact Fee.
40
(4) All donated land, Off-Sit~ Improvements, together
.~With appurtenant right-of-way or easements required by the
{County shall be conveyed to the County pursuant to ordinances,
iresolutions or regulations then in ~ffect and in a form
~acceptable te the County Attorney.
~B. Mandatory Dedications. A credit shall be granted for the
donation of land or contribution of any Off-Site Improvement
required by any deuelopment order of the County, provided that such
donation or contribution complies with the requirements of
Subsection A(1) and A(2).
(1) The credit granted for such mandatory donation or
contribution shall be valued in accordance with Subsection E
of this Section.
(2) To the extent that Road Impact Construction has been
completed at a development which was required to donate land
or contribute Off-Site Improvements pursuant to a development
order, the amount of such credit shall be reduced in
proportion to the extent that the development has been
completed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
(3) Any Road Impact Construction which is entitled to
~a credit under this Section based upon the requirement~ of a
~development order issued prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance, shall request the determination of a credit within
one (1) year from the effective date of this Ordinance. Such
request shall be filed with the Transportation Administrator.
41
1 ~ '
,oo, (JSL, 43'
Failure to apply for the ,~stablishm~t of a credit within this
period shall be deemed a waiver of the credit.
(4) In the event the amount of developer contribution
credit determined to be applicable by the Transportation
Administrator pursuant to a mandstory donation of land or
contribution of an Off-Site Improvement exceeds the total
amount of Road Impact Fees due by the Applicant for the
identified Road Impact Construction, the County shall
reimburse to the Applicant the excess credit. Such
reimbursement shall be from collected Road Impact Fees, but
shall not be paid until such time as all development at the
location which was subject to the credit has been completed
and accepted by the County.
C. Voluntary Dedications. An Applicant who desires to make
a voluntary donation of land or contribution of an Off-Site
Improvement for a Road Impact Construction shall, prior to issuance
of a Building Permit, submit to the Transportation Administrator
a proposed plan for the donation of land or for the contribution
of Off-Site Improvements to the Transportation Network. The
proposed plan of construction, dedication or donation shall
(1) a designation and legal description of the Road
Impact Construction for which the plan is being submitted;
(2) a list of the contemplated Off-Site Improvements;
42
(3) a legal description of any land proposed to be
dedicated or donated and a written appraisal prepared in
conformity with Subsection E(1) of this Section;
(4) an e.timate of proposed =cnstruction costs certified
by a professional engineer; and
(5) a proposed time schedule for completion of the
proposed plan of construction, dedication or donation.
D. Upon submission of a complete plan, the Transportation
Administrator shall schedule a presentation before the Board at a
regularly scheduled meeting or a special meeting called for the
purpose of reviewing the proposed plan and shall provide the
Applicant or Owner written notice of the time and place of the
presentation. The Board shall authorize the County Attorney to
prepare a contribution agreement with the Owner only if:
(1) Such proposed plan is in conformity with
contemplated improvements and additions to the Transportation
Network; and
(2) Such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with,other
existing or proposed plans, will not adversely impact the cash
· flow or liquidity of any Road Impact Fee Trust Account in such
a way as to frustrate or interfere with other planned or
ongoing growth necessitated capital improvements and additions
to the Transportation Network; and
(3) Such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with other
existing or proposed plans, will not create a detrimental
imbalance between the arterial and collector roadways; and
(4) The proposed plain is consistent with the public
iht,rest.
Upon approval of a proposed plan of donation or contribution,
the Transportation Administrator shall determine th, amount of
developer contribution credit basod upon the following standards
of valuation and ~hall approve the timetablu for completion of
construction.
ii?," E. The amount of developer contribution credit to bs applied
~,. shall be determined according to th~ following standards of
valuation:
(1) The value of donated land shall be based upon a
~ written appraisal of fair market value by a qualified and
: professional appraiser acceptable to the County and based upon
:~ comparable sales of similar property between unrelated parties
~. in a bargaining transaction; and
· ? (2) The actual cost of construction of Off-Sits
~;,~ Improvements contributed to the Transportation Network based
~'. upon costs certified by a profes~iional engineer. However, ~n
no event shall any credit be granted for the construction of
Off-sits Improvements in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the
' initial estimate of costs for contributions to the
· Transportation Network provided by the professional engineer
as par~ of the proposed plan.
,. F. All construction cost ~stimates shall be based upon, and
all construction plans and specifications shall be in conformity
with the road construction standards and procedures of the State,
44
County or City, as applicable. All plans, and specifications shall
be approved by the appropriate gov¢~rnmental entity prior to
commencement of construction.
G. Upon approval of a plan for the voluntary donation cf
land or the contribution of Off-Stte Improvements, a contribution
agreement mhall be entored into between the County and the Owner.
A non-refundable processing, review and audit fee of $2,500 shall
be due once the voluntary plan has been approved and prior to the
preparation of a contribution agreement by the County Attorney.
The contribution agreement shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) Identification of the parties including a
reprt~sentation from the Owner that he is the sole record owner
of the real property described in the contribution agreement.
If requested by the County Attorney, the Applicant or Owner
shall provide to the County Attorney, at no cost to the
County, an attorney's opinion identifying the record owner,
his authority to enter into the contribution agreement and
identify any lienholders having a lien or encumbrance on the
real property which is the subject of the agreement. Said
opinion shall specifically describe each of the recorded
instruments under which the record owner holds title, each
lien or encumbrance, and cite appropriate recording
infol~ation and incorporate by reference a copy of all such
referenced instruments.
(2) A finding that the donations or contributions
contemplated by the agreement are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
(3) A lmgal description of the Road Impact Construction
lands subject to the agreement.
(4) The duration of the agreement, which shall not be
for a period in excess of five years from the date of
substantial completion of the approved contribution or from
the actual date of donation, but in no event shall the
duration exceed seven years, exclusive of any moratoria, from
the date of recording in the Official Records.
(5) A description of the donations or contributions to
the Transportation Network to be made pursuant to the
agreement.
(6) An acknowledgement that the donations or
contributions contemplated under the agreement shall be
construed and characterized as work done and property rights
acquired by a highway or road agency for the improvement of
a road within the boundaries of a right-of-way.
(7) An acknowledgement that the contribution agreement
shall not be construed or characterized as a development
~agreement under the Florida Local Government Development
Agreement Act.
(8) Adoption of the approved time schedule for
completion of the plan.
(9) Determination of the amount of credit to be granted.
(10) A requirement that the Oyner keep or provide for
retention of adequate records and supporting documentation
Which concern or reflect total project cost of the Off-Site
Improvements to be contributed. Thi~ information shall be
available to the County, or its duly authorized agent or
representativ,, for audit, inspection or copying, for a
minimum of five years from the term[nation of the contribution
agreement.
(11) A requirement that the credit for Road Impact Fees
identified in the contribution agreement shall run with the
subject Road Impact Construction lands and shall be reduced
by the entire amount of the Road Impact Fee due for each
Building Permit issued thereon until the development project
is either completed or the credits are exhausted or no longer
available.
(12) That the burdens of the contribution agreement shall
be binding upon, and the benefits of the agreement shall inure
to, all successors in interest to the parties to the
contribution agreement.
(13) An acknowledgement that the failure of the
contribution agreement to address any permit, condition, term,
or restriction shall not relieve either the Applicant or
Own,~r, or their successors, of the necessity of complying with
any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said
permitting requirements conditions, terms or restrictions.
(14) Compliance with the risk management guidelines which
may be established by the County's R~sk Management Department
from time to time, including but not limited to insurance and
indemnification language acceptable to the County.
(15) Annual review and audit of performance under the
contribution% aqreement to determine whether or not there has
been demonstrated good faith compliance with the termA of the
contribution agreement and to report the credit applied toward
paymLent of Road Impact Fees and the balance of available and
unused credit. If the Board finds, on the basis of
substantial competent evidence, that there has been a failure
re, comply with the terms of the contribution agreement, the
agreement may be revoked or modified by the County.
(16) To allow for modification or revocation of the
contribution agreement as is necessary to comply with relevant
State or Federal laws, if State or Federal laws are enacted
after the execution of the contribution agreement which are
a~.plicable to and preclude the parties' compliance with the
terms of the contribution agreement.
(17) To allow amendment or cance~lation by mutual consent
of the parties to the contribution agreement or by their
successors in interest.
(18) Recording of the contribution agreement in the
Official Records within fourteen (14) days after the County
enters into the contribution agreement.
48
50
(19) The ability to file an action for lmJunctive relief
in the Circuit Court of Collier County to enforce the terms
of the contribution agreement, said remedy being cumulative
with any and all other remedies available to the parties for
enforcement of the agreement.
(20) The future reimbursement to the Owne~ of the excess
of such contribution credit from future receipts by the County
of Road Impact Fees. However, no reimbursement shall be paid
until such time as all development at the location which was
subject to the credit has been completed. Such agreement for
reimbursement shall be made over a period of five (5) years
from the completion of the development.
H. Any Applicant or Owner who submits a proposed plan
pursuant to this Section and desires the immediate issuance of a
Building Permit shall pay prior to or at the time the proposed plan
is submitted the applicable Road Impact Fee pursuant to Section
2.01. Said payment shall be deemed paid under "Protest" and shall
not be construed as a waiver of any review rights. Any difference
between the amount paid and the amount due, as determined by the
Transportation Administrator or the Board, shall be refunded to the
Applicant or Owner.
I. Any developer contribution credit granted from the Road
Impact Fee shall only be for those mandatory or voluntary donations
or contributions made to the Transportation Network to accommodate
growth and within the respective Road Impact Fee District where the
Road Impact Construction is located. Credits granted under ~hiS
49
Section shall run with the land. Any o~edit granted under the
provisions of Ordinance 85-55, as amended, shall be recognized.
J. Any Applicant, pursuant to Section 3.07, who has made a
mandatory donation of land or contribution of an Off-Site
ImprQvement shall hay, a r~ght of review of the valuation of the
donation or contribution by the Transportation Administrator for
the purposes of developer contribution credit. Mowever, there
shall be no right of review as to any voluntary donation or
contribution.
-iSection 3.07. Review Hearings.
A. An Applicant or Owner who i~ required to pay a Road
Impact Fee pursuant to Section 2.01 shall have the right to request
a review hearing.
~. Such hearing shall ~e limited to the review of the
following:
~ (1) The application or calculation of the appropriate
~iRoad Impact Fee pursuant to Section 2.01.
(2) The determination as to whether a Road Impact
~Construction is entitled to vested rights exemption under
~Section~ 3.03.
(3) The denial of an Affordable Mousing Exemption
ureuant to Section 3.04.
~ (4) The valuation of developer contribution credit for
mandatory donation or dedication of land or construction of
'iOff~ Site Improvements pursuant to section 3 06
Except as otherwise provide~ in this Ordinance, such
hearing ~hall be requested by the Appli¢:a~t or Owner within thirty
(30)~!calmndar days, including Sundays and legal holidays of the
date~iof: (1) receipt of the Notice of Impact Fee Statement; (2)
the receipt of a determination on a vested rights petition; (3)
the receipt of a determination on an Af£orddbl. Housing Exemption;
or (~) the notification of a decision on the amount of credit ~or
donation of land or construction of improvements is received.
Fail're to request a hearing within the time provided shall be
deemed a waiver of such right.
D. The request for hearing shall be filed with the County
Manager an¢! shall contain the following:
~! (1) The name and address of the Applicant or Owner;
(2) The legal description of the property in question;
(3) If issued, the date the Iluilding Permit was issued;
~ (4) A brief deacription of the nature of the
~construction being undertaken pursuant tot_he Building Permit;
~. '
~ [5) If paid, the date the Road Impact Fee was paid; and
(6) A statement of the reasons why the Applicant or
Owner is requesting the h~aring.
E. Upon receipt of such request, the County Manager shall
schedule a hearing before the Board at a regularly scheduled
meeting ¢,r a special meeting called for the purpose of conducting
the hearing and shall provide the Applicant and Owner written
notice of the time and place of the hearing. Such hearing shall
51
hale within forty-five (45) calendar,days of the date the
for hearing was filed.
F~ Such hearing shall be before the Board and shall be
conducted in a mannez designed to obtain all information and
evidence c~,levant to tho requested hearing. Formal rules of civil
procedure and evidence ,hall not be applicable; however, the
hearing shall be conducted in a fair and impartial manner with each
party having an opportunity to be heard and to present information
and evidence.
G. Any Applicant or Owner who requests a hearing purfluant
to this S~ction and desires the immediate issuance of a Building
Permit, or if a Building Permit has been issued without the payment
of the Road Impact Fee, shall pay the applicable Road Impact Fee.
The payment shall be made prior to or at the time the reques~ for
hearing i~ filed. Said payment shall be deemed paid under
"Protest" and shall not be construed as a waiver of any r,~view
rights.
'~. ~n Applicant or owner may request a hearing under tht~
Section without paying the applicable Road Impact Fee but no
Building Permit shall be issued until such Impact Fees are paid in
the amount initially calculated or the amount approved upon
completion of the review provided in this Section.
~ection 3.08. Review Requirement.
. This Ordinance and the Impact Fee Study shall be reviewed
at least every three (3) years. Each review shall consider new
estimates of population and other socioeconomic data; changes in
construction, right-of-way acquisition ~nd related costs; and
changes in Trip Generation rates, External Trip lengths and traffic
volume counts. The purpose of this review is to ensure that the
Road Impact Fees do not exceed the reasonably anticipated costm
associated with the improvnments necessary to offset the demand
generated by the Road Impact Cc, nstruction on the Transportation
Network. In the event the review of the Ordinance required by this
Section alters or changes the assumptions, conclusions and findings
of thm studies adopted by reference in Section 1.04, alters or
changes the amount or classification of Impact Fees or the
boundariee of the Districts, the studies adopted by reference in
SectiOn 1.04 shall be amended and updated to reflect the
assumptions, conclusions and findings of such reviews and Section
1.04 shall be amended to adopt by reference such updated studies.
B. Simultaneous with the review of the Impact Fee Study
required In Subsection A of this Section, the Board shall review
its respective capital improvement element of its Comprehensive
Plan,to confirm that the assumptions in such elements on the
availability and adequacy of revenue sources to construct
improvements and additions to the County Road System determined in
the Impact Fee Study required to accommodate existing development
are accurate.
?Se~3tion 3.09. Deolarat~on of Exolusion from Adminietrat~ve
Prooe4ures Aot.
Nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be construed or
interpreted to include the County in the definition of Agency as
contain,~d in Section 120.52, Florida Statutes, or to otherwise
53
subject the County to the application of the Administrative
Procedure Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statu~es. This declaration of
intent and exclusion shall apply to all proceedings taken as a
result of or pursuant to this Ordinance including specifically, but
not limited to, determination of Alternative Fee Calculation
pursuant to Sections 2.02 or 3.02, consid~ration ~f a petition for
vested rights determination under Section 3.03, determination of
entitlement to an Affordable Housing Exemption pursuant to Section
3.04, determination of Developer Contribution Credit pursuant to
Section 3.06, and review hearings under Section 3.07.
S~ction 3.10. Individual Calculation of Impact Fees.
"A. In the event a Road Impact Construction involves a land
use not contemplated under the Impact Fee Land Use Categories set
forth in Appendix A, the County Manager shall calculate the
appropriate Impact Fees utilizing the methodology contained in the
Impact Fee Study adopted by Section 1.04. The County Manager shall
utilize as a standard in his determination the Vehicle Miles of
Travel in the most similar Trip Generation Land Use Category or
any other generally accepted standard ~ource of transportation
engineering or planning.
!~B. In the event a Road Impact Construction involves a Mixed
Use Road Impact Construction, the County Manager shall calculate
. the ~Impact Fees based upon each separate Impact Fee Land Uss
i"~' Category included in the proposed Mixed Use Road Impact
leotio~ 3.1X. Severabilit¥.
The provisions of this Ordinance are ~everable, and it is the
intention to confer the whole or any part of the powers herein
provided for. If any clause, section or provision of this
Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid fnr any
reason or cause, the remaining portion of said ordinance shall be
in full f~rce and effect and be valid as if such. invalid portion
~r
thereof had not been incorporated herein. It is hereby declared
to b~ ~e legislative intent that this Ordinance would have been
adopted had such an unconstitutional provision not been included
herein.
i eerttf d copy of this Ordinance shall be filed in the
!~'~! Florida Department of State by the Clerk of the Board within ten
· (10) days after enactment by the Board and shall take effect on
:/~· August 14, 1992.
DULY ADOPTED in regular session, this 16th day of April, A.D.,
1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COM/~ISBIONERS OF
co,. co Y F .O, TDA
.~ rk --, /
: : .','' 55
~Is o~lna~e flied wlth ~e
Se~r~ta~ ofSrate's ~( flc~ ~ ~
o~ ~k~l~gement o) thot
APPENDIX A
ROAD IHPACT FEE ~TE SCHEDULE
For the purposes of calculating the amount of Impact Fs~ to
be imposed under S.ction 2.01 of the Ordinance on all Road Impact
Construction tho following definitions shall be utilized:
DEFINITIONS
~"Bank/Savingsz drive-in" means a financial institution with
facilities for motorists as well as walk-in customers.
~"Bank/Savingsz· walk-in" means a financial institution in a
free standing building with its own parking lot, and no drive-in
windows.
"Church" means a structure used primarily by a group of
individuals for the practice of religion or the profession of
faith.
& "Condominium" means a single-family or time-sharing ownership
uni~ that has at least one other similar unit within the same
building structure. The term Condominium includes all fee-simple
or titled multi-unit structures, including townhouses and duplexes.
The term Condominium includes single-family detached houses on lots
less than 50 feet wide, such as zero-lot line homes.
~"Convenienoe Narket" means a facility typically open from 15
to 24 hours daily selling primarily a limited assortment of food,
food preparation and wrapping materials and household cleaning and
servicing items. Convenience markets may also sell fuel for motor
vehicles.
~"Day Care Center" means a facility that cares for pre-school
age!'children during the daytime hours. The facility generally
includes classrooms, offices, eating areas and a playground.
~:"~olf Course" means an area designed for playing the game of
golf~ including any clubhouse, with or without bar and banquet
facilities.
~"Hospital" means any institution where medical or surgical
care.is given to nonambulatory and ambulatory patients. Hospitals
do not include facilities that provide diagnoses and are only for
outpatients (See Medical Office) nor do they include facilities
the=~ are devoted to the care of person unable to care for
themselves (See Nursing Home).
58
."Hotel" means a place of lodging providing sleeping
acco~nmodations, restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet
rooms, and other retail and service shops.
~,~unior/Communit¥ College" means all two or four-year post
high~ school educational institutions which utilize the name
"college" in their titles.
i~t'Manufaaturing''~ means places where raw materials or parts are
converted into finished products.
~ "Marina" means a facility for berthing boats, including any
ancillary social or club facilities.
"Msdtosl Office" means a facility for individual or small
groups of physicians, that provide diagnoses and outpatient care,
but~not prolonged in-house medical or s,urgical care.
"Mini-Warehouse" means a building in which a storage unit or
vault is rented for the storage of goods.
:' "Mobile Home" means trailers and manufactured homes.
Rec~'eational vehicles and campers which have been affixed to a site
or which have received an RP land use classification by the
Property Appraiser shall be consider¢~d a mobile home for the
purpose of this Ordinance.
';~ "Motel" means a place of lodging offering only sleeping
accommodations and possibly a restaurant.
"Multi-Family Dwelling Unit" means a rental dwelling unit
located within the same building as other dwelling units and
includes apartments.
~"N~/rsing Home" means a facility whose primary function is to
care for persons unable to care for themselves, including rest
homes (which are primarily for the aged) and chronic and
convalescent homes.
"Offios" means a building housing one or more tenants where
the~affairs of a business, commercial or industrial organization,
professional person or firm are conducted.
~"Raoqllet Clubs" means tennis, han~ball, squash, racquetball
end,other court sport facilities, including ancillary swimming
pools, and exercise facilities.
"Recreational Vehicle Park" means a facility for the temporary
siti~ of recreational vehicles and may have community facilities
such ~S recreational rooms, swimming pools and laundry facilities.
~'Restaurant~ drive-in" means an eating establishment with
limited or no slt-down facilities, where food is frequently ordered
end taken out to be consumed outside tbs restaurant building.
I'Resteurantz high turnover" means an eating eutsblishment
with indoor service and places for customers to sit while consuming
their meals, with turnover being less than one hour.
"Restaurant: low turnover" means an eating establishing with
indoor service and places for customers to sit while consuming
their meals, with turnover being of at least one hour or more.
"Retail" means one or more establishments devoted to selling
merchandise goods and products to consumers.
."Retirement Home" means one or more dwelling units consisting
of apartments, condominiums or a self-contained village which is
restricted to adults or senior citizens who are self-sufficient.
'School" means facilities which provide educational training
between kindergarten and high school.
"Service Station" means a facility primarily designed for
dispensing fuel to motor vehicles, including maintenance and repair
services.
n ,
~ Single-Family Detached House means a home on an individual
lot,~except detached homes on lots less than 50 feet wide, such as
zero21ot line homes.
~"Supermarket" means a retail store selling an assortment of
foods~ food preparation and wrapping materials and household
cleaning and servicing items. Supermarkets are usually open less
than,14 hours per day.
~"University" means all four-year post high school educational
institutions which utilize the name "university" in their title.
'~"Wl~olesale Warehousing" means facilities that are devoted
primarily to storage of materiel and goods and distribution areas
for receiving and shipping of materials and goods.
~ ' ~?' A-3
~PPENDIX ~
For the Durpose of calculating the Road Impact Fee to be
impoa,d under Section 2.01 of tha Ordinance, the following sch~dul,
shall be utilized:
IMPACT FEE I2~ND USE C~TEGORY IH~CT FEE RATE
RESIDENTIAL
1. Single Family Detached House $ 1,379/dwelling unit
2. Multi-Family (1-2 stories) 952/dwelling unit
3. ~Hulti-Family (3-9 stories) 935/dwelling unit
4. 'iMulti-Family (10 stories & above) 607/dwelling unit
5...~Condominium/Townhouse 846/dwelling unit
6. ~Mobile Home 526/dwelling unit
7. ~Retirement Home 455/dwelling unit
Lodaina
9. .~-tel 1,327/room
lO.~Recrsational Vehicle Park 10,744/acre
COM~IERC I]~L
~Reor®at~onal
11. !)~arina $ 457/boat berth
12. iGolf Course 1,066/acre
13. :~acquet Club~ 2,063/1,000 sq.ft.
~Institutional
14. ~:~ospital $ 2,589/1,000 sq.ft.
15. ~Nursing Home 187/bed
16. Church 1,303/1,000 sq.ft.
17. :~$chool 150/student
18. ~'Junior/Community College 183/student
19. ~niversity 327/student
20. ~Day Care 60/student
21.. ~ Office - 50,000 SF or less $ 2,453/1 000 sq.ft.
22. i:Office - 50,001 - 100,000 SF 2,076/1 000 sq.ft.
23. ~Office - 100,001 - 200,000 SF 1,753/1 000 sq.ft.
24. Office - 200,001 - 400,000 SF 1,474/1 000 sq.ft.
25. Office - greatar than 400,000 SF 1,252/1 000 sq.ft.
26. ~edical Office 3,638/1 000 sq.ft.
A-4
27. ~Retail - 50,000 SF or leaa $ 1,755/1,000 Iq.~t.
28. Retail - 50,001 - 100,000 SF 1,99§/1,000 eq.ft.
29. Retail - 100,001 - 150,000 SF 2,046/1,000 sq.ft.
30. Rutail - 150,001 - 200,000 SF 2,130/1,000 sq.ft.
31. Rmtail - 200,001 - 400,000 SF 2,366/1,000 ~q.~t.
32. Retail - 400,001 - 600,000 SF 2,508/1,000 sq.ft.
33. Retail - 600,001 - 1,000,000 SF 2,785/1,000 sq.ft.
34. Retail - greater than 1,000,000 SF 2,706/1,000 sq.ft.
35. Restaurant: high turnover 8,388/1,000 sq.ft.
36..Restaurant: low turnover 7,081/1,000 sq.ft.
37. ~Restaurant: drive-in 16,618/1,000 sq.ft.
38 ')Service Station 989/pump
39. ~Supermarket 2,825/1,000 sq.ft.
40. ~Convenience Market:
~ less than 3,000 SF 22,569/store
41..~Convenience Market:
.~ greater than 3,000 SF 9,502/1,000 sq.ft.
42, '~u~o Repair/~od¥ Shop $ 1.338/1.000
44. ~ank/Savings: drive-in 7,468/1,O00
45. :Car Wash 7,205/1,000 sq.ft.
~ndustrial and ~orioultural
46. ~L~ght-Industry $ 1,218/1,000 sq.ft.
47. .~anufacturing 678/1,000 sq.ft.
48. i~Warehousing 852/1,000 sq.ft.
49. .~ini-Warehouse 239/1,000 sq.ft.
APPENDIX B
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRIaT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
.' .B~gin ~ ~h~ intersection of Coun~ Ro~d 9~1 and ~lne Rid~
" Roadl thence along Pine Ridge Road and Seagate Drive, ~e~terly to
Gulf of Mexico; thence along the Gulf of Mexico, northerly to the
Lee County linel thence along the Collier County - Lee County
line,~i~easterly, southerly and easterly to the northerly extension
of C6unty Road 951; thence along County Road 951 and its
northerly extension, southerly to the I:~I~T OF BEGINNING.
Page 1 of 9
APPENDIX B
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRI~T 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Begin at the intersection of County Road 951 and Pine Ridge
Road;~ thence along County Road 951, sou'therly to th~ northeast
corner of Sectl¢,n 22, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier
county, Florida; thence along the north line of Sections 22,21,20
and 19 of said township and range to the northwest corner of said
Section 19; thence along the west line of Sections 19, 30 and 31
of said township and range, southerly to the southwest corner of
said'~Section 31; thence along the south line of Section 36
Township 50 South, Range 25 East, westerly to the southwest
corner of said Section 36; thence along the west line of said
Section 36, northerly to the northwest corner of said Section 36;
thence along the north line of Sections 35 and 34 of maid
township and range, westerly to the Gulf of Mexico; thence along
the Gulf of Mexico, northerly to Seaga'~e Drive; thence along
Seagate Drive and Pine Ridge' Road, easterly to the POINT OF
BEGINNING, less those lands lying within 'the Municipal Boundaries
of the City of Naples.
Page 2 of 9
m I mm
. ~ APPENDIX B
. ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRICT 3
~? LEGAL DESCRIPTION
~All of that land within the Municipal BoundarlmA of the
Naples, Florida.
Page 3 of 9
APPENDIX B
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRICT 4
LEGAL DESCRII:~ION
~egin at thu lntersscbton of the northerly line of Section
34, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida and
the waters of the Gulf of Mexico; thenco along the north line of
Sections 34 and 35 of said township and range, easterly to the
northeast corner of said Section 35; thence along the east line
of said Section 35, southmrly to thm southeast corner of said
Section 35; thence along the south line of Section 36 of said
:.-i
township and range, easterly to the southeast corner of said
Section 36; thence along the east line of Sections 36,2§ and 24
of said township and range, northerly to the northeast corner of
said Section 24; thence along the north line of Sections 19, 20,
21 and 22, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, easterly to County
Road i~;951; thence along County Road 951, southerly to State Road
90 (U.S.41); thence along State Road 90, southeasterly to State
Road '~ 92; thence along State Road 92, southwesterly to the center
of Big Marco River; thence along the center of Big Marco River,
southerly to Cape Romano; thence along the waters of the Gulf of
Mexico, northwesterly to the I~INT OF BEGINNING.
Page 4 of 9
APPENDIX B
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRICT 5
~GAL DESCRIPTION
Be~in at the intersection of County Road 558 (Oil Well Road)
and the we~t line of Hendry County; thence along County Road 858,
westerly to Oil Well Grade Roa~; thence along Oil Well Grade
Road, ~orthe'rly to County Road 84~ (Immokalee Road)~ thence along
County Road 846, westerly and southerly to the southeast corner
of Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County,
Florida; thence along the south line of Sectione 34,3~,32 and ~1,
said ~township and range, westerly to the Lee County line~ thence
along'~, the Collier County - Lee County line, northerly, easterly
and northerly to the Hendry County line~ thence along the Collier
County - Hendry County line, easterly and southerly to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Page 5 of 9
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRIC~ 6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
B~ln at the Lntersection o~ County Road 9~1 and Intermtate
Hlghway~ 7S~ thencu along County Road 9el and itc northerly
extension, northerly to the Lee County line~ thence along the
Collier, County - Lee County line, easterly and northerly to the
southwemt corner of Section 31, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida~ thence along the south line of Sections
31, ~2, 33 and 34 to County Road 846 (Immokalee Road) l thence
along ~County Road 846 northerly and easterly to Oil Well Grade
Road% thence along Oil Well Grade Road, southerly to County Road
asa (Oil Well Road)~ thence along County Road 858, easterly to
the ea~st line of Range 28 East~ thence along said east line,
southerly to state Road 84 (Alligator Alley)~ thence along State
Road :~84 and Interstate Highway 75, westerly to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Page 6 of 9
APPENDIX B
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRICT 7
,~. LEGA~ DESCRIPTION
All of that land within the Municipal Bou~darima of
Everglades City, Florida.
Page 7 of 9
~o:, 05,..;: 69
APPE)IDI X B
ROAD IMPACT FEE DISTRICT 8
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Begin nt th~ intmrsection of County Road 858 (Oil Well
and the west line of Hendry Count)'; thence along the Colliur
County - Hendry County line, southerly and easterly to the
Broward County line; thence along the Collier County - Broward
County and Collier County - Dade County lines, southerly to the
Monrom County line; thence along the Collier County - Monroe
County line, westerly to Cape Romano; thence along the center of
Big Marco River, northerly to State Road 92; thence along State
Road 92, northeasterly to State Road 90 (U.S.41); thence along
State Road 90, northwesterly to County Road 951; thence along
County Road 951, northerly to Interstate Highway 75; thence along
Interstate Highway 75 and State Road 84 (Alligator Alley),
easterly to the east line of Range 2~, East, Colkier Count~,
Florida; thence along said east line, northerly to County Road
858 (Oil Well Road); thence aiong County Road 858, easterly to
the POINT OF BEGINNING, less those ].ands lying within the
Municipal Boundaries of Everglades City.
Page 8 of 9
Original Impact
District Boundary
ExlstlngRoad
Proposed l~neFtt
District Boundary
Proposcd BoneFlt
District
Proposed Impact Fee ..... Flgurm ?-I
BeneFit DIstricts
APPENDIX C ·
AFFORDABLE BOUSI~ ST~%I~DARDS
The following shall qualify as Affordable Housing for the
purposes of receiving an Affordable Housing Exemption=
A. A Dwelling Unit which is offer,d for sale for a total
amount not greater tha~:
1. $28,000 for a on~ bedroom Dwelling Unit.
2. $35,000 for a two bedroom Dwelling Unit.
3. $41,000 for a three bedroom Dwelling Unit.
4. $46,750 for a four bedroom Dwelling Unit.
B. The Dwelling Unit which is offered for rent for a total
monthly rental amount not greater than:
1. $250 for a one bedroom Dwelling Unit.
2. $310 for a two bedroom Dwelling Unit.
3. $360 for a three bedroom Dwelling Unit.
4. $410 for a four bedroom Dwelling Unit.
STATE OF FLORIDA
~COUNT¥ OF COLLIER
I, JAMES C. GILES, Clerk of Courts in and for the
=went~eth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certAfy that the foregoing is a true copy of:
Ordinance No. 92-22
which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on
the 16th day of April, 1992, durln~ Special Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official se~a! of ~he Board of
Cowry Co~tsstoners of Collier County, Florida, th~s 23rd
day of April, 1992.
glerk of Cou~ts and
Ex-officio to Board of ..~.." . "
County Comm~ ssloners ~'..'
~
~: /s/Maure,~nvon ;~', .. · ..~.
~ De-ut- Clerk ' '~'
~ ~ /~ . ~ .~
,? ~ 1" '"~
COLLIER. COUNTY'
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE
1~1 UPDATE STUDY
Prepared for.
Collier County
Prepe~d by:
Tindale-Oliver and Associa~cs, Inc.
April, 1992
COPR
07307.91
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE 1991 UPDATE STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Collier County's tran.~portation impact fee ordinance was originally enacted in 19,~$, It requires that
the fee schedule L~ reviewed and, if appropriate, updated every two years. This impact fee update study
was undertaken by T'mdale-Oliver and Associates, Inc., to meet the requirements of the ordinance.
This study reviews the input parameters to the iml~lCt fee equation, incorporates data fi.om field studies
not avifilable when the current fee schedule was adopted, reflects the impact of r~_..cofly enacted state
· transportation funding programs, adds new land use categories to the fee schedule, and considers
~': ;i current road construction costs, Two preliminary impact fee schedules are presented for consideration
' by the County. Thc preliminary fee schedules p,zopose increases from 170 to 2110 percent over the
currrmt fee for single-family homes. Finally, r~vised benefit district boundaries are proposed and
exemption of the eastern district of the County from impact fee assessment is recommended.
Road improv~'nent funding needs through 199t~ and 2000 arc compared with gasoline tax and impact
fee revenue estimates. The estimates indicate that Collier County can meet the transportation
concurrency requirements of its Comprehensive Plan with the combined rcvr. nues of the impact fee,
gasoline taxes, and other existing road l'mancing programs.
soo, I)52-,,: 75
?
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE
TABL~ OF CONTENTS
~I. I~troductlon l
H. Tr~nspozt~tion Demand 3
.Trip Rat~ 3
. Trip l~altth 6
Field Surveys 7
=' Urban Ar~a Transpor~tion Model l 1
Pereent New Trlp~ 14
~ Recommended Travel Ch~rac~erlstlcs 16
HI. Unlt Cost o1' Fncilltlcs 18
Exeeption Stand.ds and Aw. ra~ System Performance
" Computagon of Cost per Lane-Mile 24
.'.. ~': Gasoline Tax and License Tag Fee Credits 29
¥. Impact F~ $cb~dul~ 32
~'VI. Rcveau~ Projection 37
:c' Impact Fee Red, flue Estimates 37
· Gasoline Tax Revenue E~tlmate 40
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FE~- UPDATI!
, ! TABLlt OI~ CONTEITrs
,.~ VIL Bcncl~t Di~trlcts 47
Natu~! ~md/or Maa-Mad,~ Boundaric~ 47
Ho,~o~,cneity of Existing and Proposed Lane Use 48
:, Bibliopmphy
C'.' App~dlx
;' B, Or~-D~ttnatlon Survey Studies B-I
! ';i"C, . Computation o£ Unit Construciion Cost UshI Alieraatlve Growth Rates C-I
~md pIsnnlng Horizons
! D. Alternative Study Gttldelln~ D-I
COLLIEK ~OU~TY
TRAN$?ORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDAT~
LIST OF TABLF,~
2-1 Recommended Trip Rates 4
2-2 ~:ecommended Trip Lengths 8
2-3 Model-Based Typical Trip Length Estimates 13
2-4 Recommended Percent New Trips 15
3-1 Estimated Future Needs 23
3-2 Summary of Li~ Improvements 25
5-1 Collier Count), Transportation Impact Fee Schedule 33
(Adopted Fee Schedule)
5-2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee schedule 35
(,all:mate Fee Schedule)
,'i, 6-1 Impact Fee Revenue Estimate 39
Adopted Fee Schedule, Comp Plan Growth
6-2 b:npact Fee Revenue Estimate 39
Adopted Fee Schedule, 85% Comp Plan Growth
· 6-3 Impact Fee Revenue Estimate 40
Adopted Fee schedule, ?0% of Comp Plan Growth
6-4 Gasoline Tax Revenue Estimates
Comprehensive Plan Growth Rale
6-$ Gasoline Tax Revenue Estimates 42
85% of Comp Plan Growth Rates
~,~ 6-~ Gasoline Tax Revenue Estimates 43
?0% of Comp Plan Growth Rates
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATIt
LIST OF TABLES
i; ?able ~
6-7 Summa~ of Needs, System Performance, & R~venues 44
· 6-8 Estimate Revenue Needs Based on VMT Added 44
6-9 Comparison of Other Jurisdiction Fees 46
LIST OF FIGURES
2-1 R~t~il Trip Length versus Center Size 10
=! 2-2 Percent New Tr~ps versus Center Size 17
3-1 1980 Urban Non-lnt~rstate Conditions 20
3-2 19~ Urban Non-Interstate Conditions 20
3-3 Futur~ System Performance Estkn~t~s 22
7-I Proposed Impact Fee Iknefit Districts 51
COLI.IER COUNT~'
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE 19~ I UPDATE STUDY
CHAPTER ONE
~ .... INTR. ODUC*TION
Collier County's Transporlatlon Impact Fee Ordinaz~ce was originally adopted in January, 1985, and
~,,ded in February, 1990. The fee was adopted to as:tist the County to provide ad~iuato
transportation facillti~s for ~pec~d growih. Section G of the crdlnance requires the rte to be reviewed
and, il'spproprlale, updated every two year~. The County retained Tindale-Oliver and A~sociates, Inc.
to undertake the r~vlew, whlcb is documented in this report. In addition, alternative rte schedules are
presented for consideration by the County for adoption.
The gem:ral equation used to compute the transportation imp;lc! fee for a given land use is:
Demand x Cost - Credits = Fee
The demand ['or travel placed on the transportation system Ls usually expressed in units ol'vehklc-miles
or lane-n:files ofroadway capacity consumed, the cost in units ofdollar~ per vehicle-mile or lane-mile
of roadway capacity, and the credits are an estimate of thc r~:vcnues generated by the development
which a~: allocated to roadway construction or transportation system capacity expansion. Thus, the
lee represents an "up front" payment for a portion of the cost to replace the transportation fa,:ilities
consumed by a development.
Since Collier County's original transportation impact fee was prepared and adopted, several changes
in local policle~ have occurred, and additional or new information relevant to tr:msportatlon impact
lees has becom,: available. Some of the more significant of the:lc issues which have been incorporated
into this update study include:
.T_Jad~ I Co/I/ct CounO.
'~ / ' Oilier aad Associates, Inc. Transportation l~7:~act Fee Lllxtate Stud.3'
· Changes in the proportion o['gasollne taxes thai the County will dir~t to ~ oad netwofl~
·. cxpansion versus maintenance and operation, °
· Increased Stare level gasoline lax and implementation of other transporlafion revenue
programs,
· Inclusion of more land uses for which the fee ~:hedule has been prepared,
· ' · Additionnl surveys of typical travel characteristics for various categories of land uses,
': · Consideration of the need for un impact £~ in the Llrban and Rural areas or Colller
County,
· Ulxiatcd roadway improvement cost estknates, and
:'~ .i · Alternative study guidelines.
These |tem.~ are all discussed in this report.
This report is organized similarly to the general Lmpact fee equation outlined above. The demano
component or the equation is reviewed in Chapter Two, the cost component in Chapter Three, and
creflits in Chapter Four. Chapter Five presents altematlve lee schedules. ~ estimate ofiml:SCt fee and
other r~venues is compared with road improvement costs in Chapter SLx, and benefit disLricts are
discussed in Chapxer Seven. Certain terms relating to the impact fee are defined, and guidance rega rdin8
la~d use categories is provided in Appendix a.
'~.
CHAPTER TWO *
TRANSPORTATION DEMAFID
. The transportatlon demand component of the impact fee equation provldes an tndtcation of the amount
of ttansportatlon faculty that h required to s~rve n unit of development. This quantity is frequently
:. expressed tn vehicle-roUes or travel or lunc-rrdlcs or travel, where thc convcraion rate between vehicle-
' mi]cs and lane-miles is ass~rncd (such as 8,685 vchlclcs pet day per Jane). Generally, the greater the
L. d~mand for transportation, the g~ater the transportation impact Fcc w~ll be.
,. For puxpose~ ora transportation impact lee, travel demand is estimated by multiplying three variables,
the t~4p generation rate (the number of vehicle-trlps generated per trait of development), the assessable
trip length, and the percentage of trips generated by thc devclopmc:rq adding travel to the road system.
· , Each of thc sections below presents the sources and/or prooed~ea by which each travel characteristic
": -' was estimated for each land use included tn Collier County's proposed impact fee ~chedule.
Trip Rate
The lxip rate represents the average number of trips generated by each land development activity on a
daily I:~. The trip rate is typically expressed in terms of the number of trips generated per thousand
squar~ feet o,rgross building area, ~'oss leasable area, dwelling unit, room, student, or other appropriate
independent variable. The most commonly accepted source of trip generation rates is the Institute of
Transportation Engineers'(ITE) Trip Generation report. The Fourth and Fifth editions of this
reference served as the primary source of trip generation rates for the updated transportation impact
fcc. However, the ITE reference does not provide trip generation rate information for all land uses
". included in Collier Coullty's impact fee schedule. Thus, trip generation studies conducted tn Pinellas
County as part of thc Pinella~ Counly Impact Fee Study (Ttndal,.--Oliver and Associates, February,
1~90), and other central Florida studies submitted to central I"'lorida government agencies were
consulted to compile the recommended trip rates for Collier County's transportation impact lee. The
recommended r;~tcs are summarized tn Table 2-1, Recommended Trip Rules,
TJnd.~l~ $ Collier County
· , , Ol/rerttndA$$ociates, Inc. Tr;tn.¢t~ortation lin?oct Fca LtpcL'tte Study
Recommended Trip Rates
Trip Fee Pe~er4 T~p Fee Percenl
~ Use Unll P.~e Source Ute DiffMenc, e ~ U~ Un~ Rate ~
Re~ential: ~[ice:
~F~~ ~u 9.6 ~210 10.0 ~ ~.~sf ~ ~ 1.~ 1~ ~710 1Z3
1-2 M~ du 6.6 ~ ~1 5.4 ~ ~,~1 - 1~.~ ~ 1,~ ~ 14.0 ~ 710 IZ3 14.0~
~9 ~ du 6.5 ~ ~ 5.4 19.81~ 1 ~.~1 -~.~ si 1,~ ~ 11.9 ~ 710 1
~ ~ ~ du 4.2 ~ ~ 5.4 -~ ~,~1-4~,~ sf I,~ $f 10.0 ~ 710 1Z3 -tg.0~
du 4.8 ~ 2~ 5.4 -I0~ ~t~ than 4~.~ ~ 1 .~ ~ 8-5 ~ 710 1
~ du 3.3 ~ ~ ~a
~~h~ du 5.9 ~ ~ ~a ~ Retail:
1~.~1-1~.~ ~ 1,~ ~ ~.7 ~ ~ ~.4 O~
r~ 8.7 ~ 310 10~ -17.14~ ~,~-~,~ ~a 1,~ ~ ~5 ~ ~
r~ 10.2 ~ ~ 10~ -Z~ ~.~l ~,~ ~a t.~ ~ 4ZO ~ ~ ~.4 -~.4~
~re 74.4 ~ 416 ~a Ma ~.~l ~,~ ~a 1,~ ~ ~4 ~ ~ ~.4
~h 3.0 ~ 4~ ~a Na ~le ~,~ ~ [ 7 ~ ~
~re 8.3 ~ 4~ ~a ~ ~y ~auraM 1,~ ~ ~.5 ~ ~
1,~ si 17.1 ~ 492 Ea ~a H~-tur~ ~am~ 1,~ d ~.4 ~ ~
1,~ ~ 16.8 ~ 610 ~a ~ ~ l,~ ~ 1~.5 ~ ~
~ ~ 1.1 ~ 5~ ~a ~ ~e > 3.~ ~ 1,~ ~ ~0 ~ ~! n'a
~~ ~ 1.1 ~5~ ~a ~ ~o ~ B~y~ t.~d ~9 ~
~~~ ~ 1.3 ~0 ~a ~a ~Wa~ 1,~d 1~6 ~9~1
~ Z4 ~ 5~ ~a ~a ~~ ~ 1,~ d ~ ~ 912
1~. 9.3 ~ .a
~ 4.7 ~ ~ ~a ~a
'~a' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l~y was ~ ~J~ in lhe ~ ~ ~i~ 1,~ 7.0 ~110 5.4 ~.~
~ T~ ~m~ ~ ~R~, 1~7, ~ ~h ~, 1~1~ M~ud~ I,~ 19 ~1~ 5.4 -~.1~
- ~~, ~ 1~1 W~ 1,~ 4.9 ~1~ S.0.
~-~ ~-W~ I,~ M Z6 ~ 151 S 0 ~7.~
;' ~e,~veral orthe rate,:'ttcummended ~n'Tablc 2-I bear discussion; 1='m ~me land us~..~ notably general
o~ce and ~tag, variable ~ip rat~ ;re provided by the ITE ~re~nce. ~at h, as the s~ orthe facility
~ kc~as~ ~e n~kr of trips generated ~r thousand square feet d~l~.. In the r~ ~hed~e, whe~
. a ~gc o~s~ h ~dicatcd (e.g. ~ta~ land u~ from 50,~I m.f.g.l.a, lo 100,~ s.f.g.l.a.), thc rate
co~s~nding to ~e lar~ ~ wi~ l~e rnnge has ~n entered, ~ w~l produce a ~ rate ~at
~ conse~adve Oow) [or dcvdopments wlth~ 0~e s~ range. ~e County s~ould ~ nwn~ or t~ls
' it d~, s~ould ~e ~c fight to ~c the ~es s~iRc Io the
It ~o~d aho ~ nord ~at ~p genera~on ~ ~ot ~ land ~ ~go~d by s~ ~n~s (e,~
S~opp~g ~nt~n- ~E ~nd U~ Code ~20) ~ ~o~ leasable a~a ~s ~c ~dc~ndcnt ratable,
,~ ': ~ ~ floo~ a~a or gto~ b~d~g a~a. De,raiSons of ~ese te~ a~ provided ~ T~ ~e~era~on.
THp g~era~on rate s~d]es ~de~ken ~ ~e P~ellas Co~ly Impact F~ Study ~di~ted ~at all
conven[en~ sto~ of3,~ sq~ f~t and I~ generaled a s~ar n~r or.ps, ~gardl~ ofs~.
.', ~
. ~ as was ~o~ended ~ that study, a ~ed n~r of ~ was ident~ed for each sto~,
I~ds to a fiat fi: for any convenience store o~3,~ s.f. or le~, For convenien~ sto~s o~r 3,~
a ~le ~t 1,~ s.f. has ~n ideated from the ~E ~e~n~.
~e ~o~ended ~p genera~on rat~ a~ d~fferent ~ tomy ~stanc~ from the rat~ ~ed
~nt f~ s~ed~. AddiSon of land ~e categoric, addi~onal st~ca~on ~ s~ ~ng~ o~some
': l~d ~ and ~e of ~e newer Trip Gene~tinn ~fe~n~ has ~sult~ ~ ~creases ~ ~p genera~on
.... .: ta~ for some land ~e classi~cafions and ~ducfions ~or othen. For example, ~gher ~p ta~ have
~n r~o~end~d for o~ b~ld~gs of 1~,~ s.f.g.b.a, or less ~an were ~ed ~ the orig~al f~
~. ~hed~e ~a~ ~e additional d~m ~cluded ~ ~e Fif~ Edition Trip Generation ~fc~nce ~d~cates
h~er rat~ n~ appropriate. Rat~ for all s~s over 1~,~ s.f.g.b.a, a~ lower than ~ ~e original f~.
Trip rates for reta~ land ~ have ~n s~latly ~Fmed, For shopping cente~ 150,~ s.f.g.l.a, and
~ ': smaller, ~e ~co~ended ra~es a~ hlg~er than tho~ o~ t~e cur~nt ~ee, whereas for those g~ater than
150,000 s.f.g.l.a., the rates are lower. Rates have ~en idenfiHed for many "new" land use calegori~,
for which no fees have ~en ]den~ed ~ the current fee schedule. DEcu~ions with County slnffhave
Yiad:~le S Collier Co~ty
~: Oliter and A.esociates, lac. Trantportation lmlx'trt Fee Ulxhtte Stud).
hadicale~l that have the, sc land uses would have been charged a fee,based on she.specific consldaradons,
~d ~rom no general comparison of the f~s was ~ssible.
~e ~p nrc ~ only one of the ~r~ variables used to est~ate tra~l demand, and ~e cffx~ on the
ofchang~ from ~c old rates can ~ offgt by ~e adjus~ents to trip length and ~c ~r~n~ new
factor.
~v~ I~d ~. R~sonab~e ~at~ of ~e lypic~ len~h of ~ps to and [rom a development
n~ to ~b~h eq~ ~'~n ~e ~ c~argtd for va~ous land uses. For ~ple. ~
~t ~ o~dcvelopmc~t gtncrate ~e s~ n~t o[ trips, but ~ [tom ~e ~m dtwlopmcnt
~ mo~ o~i~ capacity, and s~o~d ~ charged a g~er ~ ~ ~e ~e~st ofequltably
~o~ ~s o[ dtvclo preens.
~e ~h o[~ps ~ed to compute an ~pact f~ has ~n d~c~d M the 'as~able" ~p length.
~e "a~ab]t" t~p ]cn~h m~ ~e ~on o[lhe tot~ ~p length ~at ~ new ~a~l on ~e
and collator road s~em. for w~ch ~ent s~o~d ~ made. ~o a~ent ~ made ~ot ~
~ "cap.ed", ~d o~y ~e len~b o[diver~on ~ a~t~d ~or "diverted" ~. Local st~t ~!
~cluded f~om ~e a~ble ~p lcn~h ~a~t ~e Co~ty do~ not b~d 1~ st~ts w~th
t~onadon fi~ds. ~ob ~ ~lly ItR to the dcvelo~n orsubdiv~sions. ~ add,don, ~e
of~ ~g the ~ ~e~te ~lem ~ f~quently excluded ~a~e the Fede~l forewent admin~l~
expansion of~e Interstate sys~m on a na~onal bas~ with a ~r~on of the Fede~lly levied ga~l~e
~x. In ~is u~a~e study, tra~l on I~al sl~ts xvas excluded from the a~es~ble trip length.
Ink,tale ~rtion of travel was also removed from the re~rted "as~able~ trip length by di~ounting
it by an est~a~ed Interstate mReage reduction factor prior lo computing the Total Impact Cosl ~
fee ~hedule.
Thc best sou"ce o£ trlp lehigh informatin.n i~ lo survey existi:,~g develol~menU. Ufilike trip generation
rate int'ormation, however, relatively few surveys have been co~ducted ol'indlvldual dcvelopmenls to
tsttma~e the average trip length as such surveys are labor Intensive and costly. The I'requency ol'such
sunrcy~s has incre~lsed lately in Central Florida as communltie~ have adopted impact Ices, and this report
ha.,~ dnsxrn upon such surveys where they were available. In addition, Collier County staff conducted
trip-length and percent new ~p surveys at thirteen sites (five land uses) withL'~ Collier County to
incorporate into this impact fee update study.
A second so~,u'ce oftrlp length data is the u~ban area transponatlon planning process. This process uses
surveys or trip-malting characteristics to estimate ~rban area,,wide travel demands. For some types o1'
d=velopment, the urban area transponatlon planning proofs can provide reasonable estimat~ or
17plcal trip lengths.
Recommended trip lengths for the land uses included in the transportation impact lee schedule were
obtained £rom the sources described above. Recommended typical trip lengths £or Coillet County's
updated impact fee are presented Ln Table 2-2, Recommended Trip Lenglhs.
· The land uses £or which dil'cct survey data was used to ldenti£y trip length are denoted by the 'SUR"
code in the 'Source" column of Table 2-2. Urban area model.based trip lengths (which are discussed
below) are iclenti~ed by "MBTL". The sections below describe the procedures used to estlm~.te the
typical trip lengths recommended £or Collier Counly's transportation impact fee.
He. ld surve~ of selected land uses have been conducled in Central Florida by and under the direction
o£ Tindale-Olivet and Assoclat~ staff'. These surveys hax= l'ocuscd on land uses which are not
rea.sona bly represented in urban area transporlatlon models--prlmarily telall and service la nd uses. For
example, a transportation model will not make a distinction between lea convenience slore employees
and ten groce~ store employees because bolh tyl~s are considered retail employees. In fact, these land
uses will exhibit cliff.cron t trip characteristics in lerms oflrlp ger,eration, lengths of trips, and proportion
.Zindnlc
Oils ~r a'nd A.~.~oc/at~.¢, Inc,
- ..... Table2-2
'-.~ ~ Recommended Trip Lengths
~ Tr~ Fee Pemem T~ Fee
M~ H~e du 3.6 ~R 4~ -~ great~ than 4~.~ ~ I.~ ~ 5.2 M~ 5.0
~~~ du 4.7 M~ ~ ~ Reran7:
of I~pa captured from tr~ps already uslnl~ the adjacent street.
Sources oflicld s~,rvcys include studies conducted lbr transponatlon impact fee ordinance preparation
in v~rlous communities in Central Florida and stud~cs submhled by developen to justif~
lo fee~. ri'he som~s used in this report are listed h~ the Bibliography. In addition, thirteen slice (five
land uses) were survcy~ in Collier County to supplement the data available from publLshcd sourcet
The land us~s su.weyed were:
~ :z~ · Bauks · Fast Food Stores
',.'~ · Shopping Centers · Gasoline Stations
., · Convenience Stores
Thc surv~s conducied in Collier County are docu:nented in Appendix B of this reporl.
Some o£these surveys were designed to identLry not only the typlc~,! lengths of Wlps to the development,
but also the amo~mt of travel they tFplcally add to the road ~tem (e.~. per~nt offfil~ captured from
traffic al.r~dy u.,;ing the adjacent street and proportion o£ trips attracted to the development as a
s~onda~ stop diverted from a trip between an origin and the prknar7 destination). Th~ L~ues were
consid~'ed with the intention to equitably a.~s development~.
Retail trip characterlstics reporled in the surveys were closely revle,~,td. A general relationship between
lrip rate and the lenglh oftrlps has begun to emerge. That is, small developments with higher trip rates
(c.g. convenience stores, fast food restaurants, service stations, etc.) have exhibited relatively shorl trip
lengths, while large developmen~a with lower trip~ rates have exhibited lonl~r trip lengths. A
iljustrating this ~latlondaip was developed and applied in the Pinella$ County impact Fee Study, and
was updated in this study to take i~to consideration addhlonal st udles. This cu.n,e, shown ia ir~gu~e 2. !,
~ras ~ Io ~ a ~o~ati'mo~ ~-qa6on~hip l~'~m lh~ trip k'ng~h and bm'l~m~ si2~ for ~ r~tail
land uses Included In the fee schedule. Recommended trip lengths in Table 2-2 from this curve nm
denoted by "RC" (regression curve) in the "Source" column.
O/htr and A$$ot'i'~tes. lnt: Tr.,n.~pt~rt.,t/on Imlx~ct F~ Upd. tte Studr
Figure 2-1
?Retail.~T/fp Length Versus Center Size
4.0
~ .3.0
-
~ 2.0
o.o ' ' ' , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Shoppin~ Center Size (1;000 sf~lo)
Source: ~ndole-Oliver ond ~s~oc[ote~, Inc. 1~92
IIrt,sn ;Area T'rsns?ortntinn
~mo land ~ ~ ~ener~lly ~gnrded to not ~ptu~ su~tanti~ vol~m~ or~ ~rom ~e adjacent
I~nd ~ generally act as the ortg~ or des~atlon oF p~ tfl~ and
~d~, o~, ~d~t~al, and ~s~tutlonal had u~. In ~e a~n~ o~eld s~y data, ~o data
~11~ ~or ~nd apptted to ~e ~n ~n ~anspon~tlon p~ann~g models de~lo~d fo~ Collier
Coun~ e~n provide re~on~ble ~p Icn~h es~nntes.
~ oF ~e ~ ~ for an ~b~ a~ ~o~nt]on pla~ m~el u~ate s~dy. ~oto~ts
~h ~o~on h ~ to iden~y ~p l~n~h fr~u~ dhm~utio~, Io ~l~te ~p hte~h~ge
~fion hcto~ and ~ate ~p generation charac~sti~ for ea~ of ~n ~p p~s~ ~
~da~ m~,d network ~ ~o~afion, ~e' av~ge lcngt~ of ~ps h m~ can ~ ~a~d for
~p ~;ths by land ~o t~ ~om ur~n a~a t~nsponatlon study dsta
~ "" · sv~;e non-l~ ~ l~;ths for ~ch or~n standard ~p p~s~ w~ ~ated
':. by appl~g ~a~ a~ig~ent pro~es of ~e urban a~a model to t~ ~ene~ted
· ~c pro~on of~kl~i~ gcn~t~ by pu~ for ~do~ land ~ was
.e~, ~g ~e ~n-~ip generation pr~u~ and ~hlcle ~upan~ facto~ of the ~ban
· .=~ a~a mod~, and prof~onal judgement, and
~.'. '.~ · ~e n~ve ~fo~a~on was combined to ~at~ ~e avenge length of vehicle tri~
· . ~e p~o~on of~hicle ~ by ~ip p~se ~r se~ral lyes oflnnd ~s was ~t~at~ ~g 19~0
~io-~ono~ da~ and ~e ~ip ge aeration rat~ ofthe Collier County ~anspo~alion plann~g mo~el,
By ~ola~ng appropriate ~put land ~e va~abl~l ~ their own franc analysis zones, the pro~ion
,~ p~r~on-tdps by purpose generated by a ~iven land use was es~Lmaz~l. The.moOd lnpuLland u~
' ~riables u~l were:
· SLngle family re~dencem
· Multi-l'arrdly r~tdences
· lndtmtrial employment
· Service employment
a School enrollmc~t
' Table 2-3, Modal Based Typical Trip Le. ngth Estimates, sumrnarbzs the results ofthese analyses and
the land u~es 1o which the urban area study trip length e~lL, nales were applied. In addition, the input
land use variable on which the proportion o£ trips by purpose was based is indicated.
'= In thc case o£office and recreational land uses, service emplo)ment scrod as thc basis for csfirnagng
the proporgo,~ of trlps generated in each of the seven trip purl~ses. In the urban ar~a transportation
model, the t~rvlce employment category includ'es all non-industrial, non.retail employment in the
!'.' :~' county- a wide range of activities with widely varying trip generation characteristics. Oll'~ce land uses
!i! '- are one ofthe many tyl~-.s of land uses included in the service category. A review of the proportions of
trips by purpose indicated that a "sarvice" emplo~ ce in the transportation model generates more home-
based socio-recreational trips and home-based miscellaneous trips than we fecl is appropriate for o. flice
i' l~od ~$. Thu~ the proportioa ol'tril~ in them two purpose~ wer~ reduced ~o provld¢ ~ mixtm'~ or
!.i" trips by pm'pose that we judged reportable l'or typkal olllce land ~ For recreational land ~ the
home-b~ed worl~ and home-based m~ellaneou.,~ trips were reallocated to the home-ba~d soclal and
recreational purpose to reflect the residentially oriented nature of the land use.
~: '~. ShnJlaliy. l'or the retirement home land use category, home-based work trips were re-allocated to the
' ', o~her home-based production purpose~ to retlect that retirees do not travel to work on a regular basis.
For educational land uses, thc school enrollment and service employment trip gcnernllon proportions
wcrc mbied, using a relationship o£one employee pst 12 students.
O//,'~r at~dA.~soc~te~: [nc. Tr,~.~port,?t/on In~A~c't Fee Update Studj,
,, ,o,, 91
Table 2 - 3
Model. Based Typical Trip Length Estimates
'rr~ I~'po~ [1): Hew
N~. ~-~tM ~ale Trip LeflOth: 6,40 4.~ 4,S3 4.~ 367 4,14 ~0,~
RESIDENTIAL
~Flm~ ~U 24,1~ 12.3~ 17.0~ 22.1~
~ MOU 1&.2~ 13.6~ 10.~ 2O.l~
LODGING
RECR~ ~ON
~ s~ ~,0~ o.o~ ~.0~
~ s~ ~.0~
~h k~ ENK SE ~ 3.3~
G~ERAL OFRCE
INDUSmI~L
N~II: I. HBW-P (-N ~ H~
NHB · N~e ~
~ ~ic~ ~p l~ ~g from ~ pr~cd~ a~ gcnc~lly compambl~ to or ~oncr ~an
· o~ ~ in ~Eicr Co~ty's original transportation ~pact f~ ex,pt ~or ~e su~y-bascd lengths
of hoWl and motel land us~ ~ adjus~cn~ lo this demand wHablc generally do not contribute
si~ntl)' to ~crcascs ~ f~ for vaHo~ land uses. In Fact. substanfinl reductions ~ retail trip
lcn~h~ arc x~ommcndcd, contdbutlng to lo~z fcc ~t~ ~or these land uses.
i~,As · p~rl o£est'~nating average trip lengths, the propo:tions of' the Irip !en~l~s that occur on I~al
'~ s~ and I ater~tnte h~ghways w~re ulso estimated, Local s~rett ~a~l is est~nted ~nuse ~pact
a~ ~ually not used to construct Ioc~ s~r~ts, and ~herefore il h ~appropdale Io a~ess I~al
· ~ ~vel. By ~licy d~islon, ~I on Interstate highways ~ not ~esscd ~a~e they a~ funded through
:' ' fede~l f~d~g on a national level. ~en est~at~g gasol~e tax c~di~, howc~r, these com~nen~
:: or a ~p m~st ~ ~cluded ~a~e gasoline ~axes a~ generated whenever gasol~e h cons~ed,
~ g~rdl~ ol'~e ty~ of road ~ave~ed on. Local smut lra~:l and Interstate ~a~l for trips generated
~ Colli~ Co~ty were also ~aled ~g the urban a~a ~ansponadon plann~g model. ~e non-
~ Io~, non-b~te avenge ~p lenffihs (i.e. ~e ass~able ~p lenffihs) a~ ~po~d ~ Table 2-2,
~ In~te ~1 was ~a~ at 3.8 ~ent of ~e a=~ble ~p length, and lhe a~ge l~fl
~ ~"' Pem~t New T~ps
,' ~e ~t ~ew ~ factor ~og~ ~at some ~F~ gong to a new land de~lopmenl activity do not
' ;~ ln~du~ additional ~a~l, bul a~ either captu~d from ~ips a~ady on ~e adja~nt roadway ot
~' di~d lo fl~e site ~ a m~ner ~at does not ~Iroduce additional lra~:l on the road s~lem. ~
~nt new ~ps factor ~ed ia ~e ~pact fee equation rep~sen~ the ~r~nt by which ~e trip rate
m~p~efl to est~ate Iht pro~nion or.ps generated by ~e new de~lopment ~at add new ~a~l
to lhe roadway network. ~ faclor was not considet~ ~ Collier Co~ty's orig~al ~, and
~:' it ~ a new co~demfion for Co~ier Co~ty's Tm~s~flon ~pact F~. It ~ ~nant ~ equably
a~ng l~d dev~opmenL ~ factor can o~t ~c~ases in ~ip generaOon ral~ and ~p ldn~
I~omlion on ~e ~nt oraew trips a~ociated wi~ va~o~ land ~es was obtained from ~e studies
. '~e ~o~endtd ~nt ~ew ~ps for Collier Cl~ly's u~ated lransponation ~pact
smaH~d inTable 2~. In some ca~s, prof~slonaljudgement was applled to ~t~ale lhe ~ntage
'~.' or new Irips. h~en judgemenl was applied, ~e ~rccnl new lrlps faclor from land uses judged
.~. s~ar ~ nature were ~l~ted. ~ was done rot retail Irip lengths, a regression cu~e w~s develo~d
~ ~ ~ 14 Coil/er Couno'
~ * ! Recommended Percent New Trips I
~F~~ ~ 1~ N~ I~ 0.~ ~.~~ 1.~ ~ ~ I~
~F~ ~9 M~ ~ I~ ~ 1~ ~ 1~,~1-~.~ sf 1 ,~ ~ ~ ~ 1~
A~ du ~ ~R 1~ -~ ~ ~e 1,~ 81~ ~ I~ -19.~
F~F~~T 1,~ ~ ~ 1~ ~
N~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ -1~ ~<3.~M ~e ~ ~ 1~ ~1~
I
~:: £or the percent of new t~p,t fur ttta~ land uses. This cu~e is i:justtated in ~gu~ 2-2; Pe~ent New
T~p~ ven~ Cen~er S~e. ~e r~o~cnded ~rcent new trips for all ~tail s~ ~tego~ we~ based
on ~ cm'e to ensue a cons~lenl relationship ~ ~e r~ as ~e s~ o[~la~ facilifl~
R~nmmended Tra~I
~. ~e r~o~cnd~ ~avel charac~fistim for ~e d~and com~nent of ~e T~fion ~pact F~
' ~fion a~ pm~nt~ ~ Tables 2-1, 2-2, and 24. ~ey ~m cn~red ~to ~c ~ct f~ ~h~e
spma~h~t ~d ~ ~ reed to calc~am ~c coms~nd~g ~ct f~ for ~e l~d ~ ~dica~.
The recommended travel ch aracteristics represent the best compilation o£sour;~s and studies available
to the consultant at thc time this r~port was prepared. It ia recognized that studies ortypical trip Icngll~
· =d p~rcemt new Mp$ are relatively unavailable, or that some land uses proposed for development may
not Ix: readily associated with one of the land dasstlicattons provided in the impact fee schedule.
TherrJ'ore, we recommend that thc County be receptive to studies of land uses. Proposed Ahematlve
Study Guidelines have been developed for usc of such studies and are presented in Appendb[ D.
Percent New Trips VersUs Center Size' ~'~
I ~ 80.%
~..
· ' 75%
~ ~ ~ 65~
~ ~ 60~
55~
~ 45~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I
Shoppin~ Center Si~e (1,000
Source: ~ndole-Ol~er end ~sociote~. Inc. 1992
The cost component of ~e ~mpact fee cq~,afion rep~sents Se unit cost to replace the ~'ansponatlon
~'~tem ~p~chy co~ by new de~lopmenl. ~ new de~lopmen[ cons~ ~d
h ~ n~saty to ~nt~ually ~pln~ capacity ~ order ~o p~e adopted ~r fo~an~ ,ta~dards. ~e
b~ or~e ~mlt cost ~ Collier Co~ty's Comprehe~ivc Plan Tragic C~culatlon ~ement for 1996 and
2~. ~ ~ghway plan ~ ~e approp~ate basis ~a~ it s~es ~e m~ a~ptable level of
~ for ~ozds and ~a~ it iden~ ~e comb~afion of road ~provemen~ n~ded to supra
~d ~wth ~ a~ordan~ ~ ~e ~delb~ adopted ~ Co~ier Co~ty's Comp~hensi~ Plan.
~ chap~r d~c~ ~e d~e~n~ ~ an"cx~pOon" le~l of~n~ slanda~ t~icgly adopted
~ a ~mp~he~i~ plan and an "a~ragc" level oFsc~ conditlo:n n~ to mana~ and mgn~
'~e '~pfion" standard. ~ d~er~ bas ~plicatlons for ~e cost ~r lan~e ~ to ~mpute
· e ~pact f~. ~e d~c~slon ~ Bl~ted ~1t ~Iorical, cu~nt, and proj~ted ~way condlgo~
to ~di~te lhe ~nds ~at ~ave ~ and a~ proj~ted Io ~ur rela~g to ~e overgl ~rro~ance
of~e ne~'ark. ~ analysis ~ done for ~e l~e ~od from lpg(} to ~e projecled ~rfo~an~ or~e
~r 2~. Finally, ~e computation of ~e cost ~r lane-~le h d~umenled and ~c oF an avenge
~ ~rfo~an~ conslde~gon ~ ~e ~pact f~ equation ~ I,re~nted.
Exception Stsndnrds and Average Syslem PerFo~nn~
In de~op~g ~phal ~prov~ent prog~ms and comprehensive plans, co~[t[~ adopted
'~cepfion" standards to ensue severe conditions did not ~cur. ~e~ adopted slnndnrds were ~ually
ie~ of~ D, and ~met~ ~ for arterial roadway. ~ ex~pOon standa~s a~ appropriate
lo ~la~ grow~ (concu~cn~ ~su~), and lo dete~e when and which roads lo ~prove.
s~ply put, a road on which traffic vol~ ex~ the ex~ption standard will ~qui~ fund~g and must
~ ~pro~d lo maintain ~e ~qu~men~ of the Comprehensive Plan. However, ex~plion standa~s
do not'adequately addrc~ system-wide Fmnncbg nod monnge~enl
System conditions give :tn indication oF thc tute o[' Funds needed to maintain Iht exception standard
adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. The average system performance relates to the percentage of
roadways ot percentage o[' vehicle-miles ol' travel at various levels of service, or levels o1' roadway
saturation. 'rd get a better understanding of ay:rage system p.'tl'om~ance, this study documented the
average syst~:m performance for four time periods on non-Interstate arlcrial roads within the "urban"
designated area of Cotlier County. The example below tliscusses degrees o['roadwny saturation rather
then levels orservice. Roads at or over 100 percent saturation are estimated to be operating at or over
the adopted performance standard and are considered in need or'improvement.
1980 road s~tem operating conditions were estimated by comparing 1980 volumes with the highway
configuration as it relates to the number ot'lanes for each link within Coll~er County in 1980. Figure
3-I iljustrates the d~tribution oftraYel by degree of toad satu~tion for 1980. In reviewing the Figu~,
it can be seen that the majority of travel occurred on roads at saturation levels below 50 percent, and
no travel occurred on roads operating at saturation levels exceeding the exception perl'otmance
standard. The average weighted saturation level was 39.5 perceive. This Figure indicates that the overall
condition ol'the network in 1980 was very good.
1990 conditions were similarly analyzed. The systems evaluation produced Figure .1-2. In tev~ewin~
Figure 3-2, the overall conditions of the network are still reasonably good; a substantial number o£
roads were still operating at levels o£satutallon below the exception standard and the magnitude of
travel on toads exceeding thc exception standard was small. Only 13 percent of vehlcle-miles of travel
we. tn on toads operating beyond the standards adopted in thc Comprehensive Plan. The "exception"
performance standard would have indicated that, in addition to improvements constructed between
1980 and 1990, only 15.8 additional miles ol'toad should have b.'en improved. However, by comparing
the 1990 cc,nditions with the 1980 conditions graph, it can be seen that the toad system has been
consumed ~t a faster rate than capacity was being added. The weighted system salutation increased
from 39.5 percent in 1980 to 73.0 percent in 19~..'0, and congestion increased. Il can also be seen that
more ltavel occurs at higher levels of saturation, which indicates roads will e~'entually need to be
impro;~:d as volumes meet and exceed the exception standard on specLqc toads.
~'it~tt:~A, I Jt Co/1/et Count.,
Olit~r,soct.4s~oe/a/es, Inc. ?rr~n.cpott.~t/on l/~p.'l~'t £t'e UlXt~t¢ $tu~tr
,oo, 98' '
Figure 3-1
1980 Ut'Dan Non-lnterstat~ Conditions
I~
o.o o.1 0.2 0.3 o,& o.5 o.I o.? 0.8 0.t) t.o 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.& 1.5 1.1
SeCurer|on Level
Weighted $oturatlon Level -- 0.595
Source: l'ir~dole--Ollver end Asaoctotel, It~c. 1991 COLSOA,WK3
Figuro 3-2
I990 Urban Non-Interstate Conditions
40~
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0,4 0.$ 0.6 0.70,a 0.9 t.0 1.1 !.2 1.3 1.4 1.*,
Saturation Level
Weighted Soturotlon Level m 0,7,30
Source; Tindole--Oliver and Associates, Inc. 1991 COLg0A,WK3
The above at, ab'sis demonstrates that :he use o£nn exception :~tandard l'ocu~es :~ttcntion on roads thai
exceed the adopted peri'nrta·ncc limit. The exception standard perspective would Indicate relatively few
needs were unadd res·ed between 1980 and 1990. In contrast, tee average ~y~tem performance approach
establishes an overall perspective of the mr, that the highway ~;ystem is being consumed versus the/ate
capacity is being constructed in the overall network. It points out that growlh has been cnnsuming the
road s~tem at a faster rate than Its capacity has been replenished~a trend that must be addressed if
?- .' concurrency standards are to be met.
Afltt completing the tevlew of the historical conditions of 1980 and existing conditions of 1990, ·
~trlety of futtat year conditions for 1996 and 2000 were estimated. Again, tl~ was done by taki~8
various future year road network volume estimates and comp!eting a systems analysis. Three growth
rate scenarios were tested. The first alternative made use oft,he tramc growth projections that served
as the basis for Collier County's Comprehensive Plan (6.0 pe~:ent per year linear growth), the second
assumed the rate of growth slowed to 85 percent ortho rate used in Collier County's Comprehensive
Plan ($~ percent per year linear), and the third alternative assumed the rate of growth slowed fitrthcr
to ?0 percent oft~c rate used In the Comprehensive Plan (4.5 percent per year linear). 7hetzrincilale
sddL~$ zfie~e an~ly$'es was ~at only toads e~rceed/n% ~e exc~po'on per£onnance standards ~uld Im
,kn/~rored. This is a very positive statement because as long as roads do not exceed the exception
standaMs there are no Comprehensive Plan concurrcn~ issues. The results of the analyses ofthes~ time
periods are illu.stratcd in Figttre 3-3, and are summarized in Table 3-I,
The 1996 and year 2000 system condition graphic (Fig, ure 3-3), iljustrates that the amount of travel on
roads operating at saturation levels between 50 to 100 percent will be concentrated when compared to
1980 or 1990 conditions. The weighted average system saturation remains stable, however, at
'approximately 70 percent, as indicated in Table 3-1. This Indicates road congestion is being maintaIned
"in equlh'brium" ss Collier County grows.
T/hd.'dC 21 Collier Coun O'
Offwr and AssocL?te.¢, Inc. T.;~n¢porralion Iml~'~ct Fee Update Study
':'" ' Figure 3-3
?. Future System Performanc'e Est/mates
~ ~ Coll~
.~ ~ . OIh~r and A.~soc/;~l~; /n(~ Tt, l~rt,~t/o~ ImD~ct F~ U~lt Study
Estimated Future Needs
Ttaffi~ Improw)m~ot Cost I~¥ Weighted
Or~h C~ Lane-Mile
1996 Estimata~'
~ Gr~h S.~ S M, 074 ~8,M7
~ Estimate~'
N~ 1. ~nual ~tlei gr~h rat&
~ AUIRdata~ June 19, 1~1
Because the 1990 saturation Eve[ was observ~l at 73 percent, and an average saturation level o1'73.6
pcrccat seems to co nsistcntly occur when different grbwth rates evaluated through 2000, it appears !hat
at this point in the development of Collier County's major road network that maintenance of an
saturation level o£73.6 percent will allow the County to maintain its exception standards. In other
words, an average saturation level ot'73.6 percent appears to be the natural result of maintaining the
~ standar~ that prohibits any road segment from exceeding 100 percent saturation between
1990 and 2000. Given that the average saturation of the existing system is current;y 73.0 percent, and
that impact fees can be used to maintala existing conditions, the use or this factor in the impact fee
equation is d¢i'ensible. Table 3-1 also indicates the total funding needs declined as the rate of growth
declined, which Ls ;m expected trend.
The improvement implementation cost estimat~.'s include costs for right-of.way, construction, facility
design, and construction administration. Costs for the Improvements listed in Table 3-2 ~re obtained
~om the Florida DOT's Six-Year Work Program (Adopted July I, 1991), and Collier County's Capital
Projects Status Report Third Quarter, Fiscal Year 1991. ~s~ ~z~ts do nol/~c/ude dama~ ~wae~s
J'a~ultln8 fram/andacqui~it/on, ,'l~'h il'added, ,~uJd increase ~he unit cost to add capacit),.
Table 3-2 is an example oftht computation of the unit roadway construction cost. It contalns a llstiag
ofa~ the road improvements planned wlth~n the County l~Is through 1~96, describes the type of
impr~,n=nent planned, the amount of capacity Io be added by the Improvement, and gencrali:t.~!
planning estimates of' the Improvement costs.
The amount of'capacity added to the road system by each Improvement ~nis estimated by multiplying
the length of the improvement by the difference between the service capacity of'the Improved facility
and the service capacity o£the existiag facility. Generalized daily planning servL-e volumes developed
by CoIlic. r County that cor~spond to the adopted per£ormance stt~ndard were used for these estimates.
These service volumes are documented ia a separate report entitled "Collier County Highway Capacity
Analysis Generalized I. cvel of Service Table" prepared by David ;Plummet and Associates, lac., dated
June 30, 1990.
The road improvcments cited tn Table 3-2 represent an estimate of'roads that will be improved over the
next six to ten ytars based on c~t estimates ofgro~'th. Upon £ta'ther study, the Countymay choose
to improve ~arallcl facilities, or may f'md that future groMh patterns may be di~Terent from today's
estimates, leading to a difI'erer~t set of' road Improvements. The roads ia Table 3-2 serve as the most
reasonable "representative sample" o£roads upc.n which to base an estimat~ of'the cost to expand the
r~ad network's capacity. Actual roads constructed may vary from the lists provided herein.
[~:.L : : 77~c1.? 1~, .~4 Coil~er Court
! ~.i.-'. Ollv~r andAs, voclates,/nc. Tran$1~ort.~t~n imix'tct l~ee IJixtate Stud).
52,, 103
Summary of Link Improvements 1990-1996
ROAD ~ ~lJ~lecl Di~
NO. ~ FRigO ~ ~ ~.) V~ V~e ~ ~.~
~1 ~ ~. P~e ~ ~. to ~ Gate P~ 4D ~ ZS
~! ~ ~. D~ B~. to U~I ~ ~ 0.8
~ ~ ~. N~ ~. to ~n~ ~ke B~. ~ ~ 1.4 10~ ~ ~,7~ ~14
~ D~ B~. ~s ~ke B~. to ~ ~n R ~ 4D 1.0 18.~ ~ ~ $~
~ D~ B~. ~ty Barn ~. 10 ~a B~a ~ 4D 1.4 17,1~ ~,4~ ~,0~
~ ~ Gale ~ G~te-Frank ~. lo ~ ~. 4D ~ 1.6 41
~51 G~e-Frank ~. ~ana ~. to G~ G~I ~. 4D ~ 1.6 ~.~
~1 ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ake Ham~ ~. to U~ ~ 4R ~4 15,~ ~,~ 78,~ S2~
~1 I~e M ~ ~. U~I !o Manat~ ~. ~ 4D 1.1 16,1~ ~,~
~1 I~ ~ ~ ~. Manat~ ~. to P~-Au-~e ~ ~D 1.5 19,7~ 41,~ 31.~0 ~7~
19,~
41
111~ Av.N. Va~E ~. to US 41 ~ 4D 1.0 11,~ 24~ 1~ ~
~ ~a~ ~. U~I to A~ ~. ~ 4D Z0 19,4~ 41,~ 43~
~6 ~~. ~.t01-75 ~ 4D 15 19,~ 41~ ~4~ ~14
L~n ~, P~ ~ ~. lo Gr~ ~. ~ 4D !.0 11,~ 24~ 12,~ ~53
~ ~ I~ial ~ to ~ ~. 0 ~ 4~ 0
~ ~ G~ ~te ~ ~o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~.4 0 lg,~ ~,1~ S~
~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ to ~'~. ~ ~ ~ ~ 5z,~ 15.~ s;52
~ ~~. ~ ~. to 1-75 ~ ~ Zo ~.1~ ~.G 43.~ S~
~ ~. ~ ~. to ~way ~ ~ 1.4 11.~ 24~ 17.~
~ ~. ~s way lO ~a ~a B~. ~ ~ 1~ 11,~ 24~ ~ ~
~ ~. hMa Bi.ri B~. lo ~ ~ 4D 1~ 11.~ 24.~ lg,~ S~
Table 3-2 (continued)
~ ~ ' Summary of l. ink Improvements 1990-1996
~ E:d::t Ho'~ V~..~.~o- ROW ~ ~ ~ T~
~' ~E~ FR~O ~ ~ ~.) V~ V~ ~ ~1.~ ~1.~ ~1.~ ~I.~ ~1.~
~ ~ ~tl~ake H~k ~ U~I lo ~ B~ ~ 4D 0.8 11.~ 24~ 10.1~ ~ S1.~ S1~ ~ ~.1~
~ ~ ~,~ke H~k ~ ~~ B~. I0 ~ Barn ~ 4D 0.S 11.~ 24.~ 6.~ S375 ~ S124 ~ S1~z4
~ ~ake H~k ~ ~ B~n ~. to ~ A~ ~ 4D 0.7 11.~ 24~ 8.8~ ~ S1~ $1~ ~ S1~
~a B~a B~. ~ to ~t~e ~ ~. 0 ~ Z2 0 24.~ 53.4~ S~0 ~ ~ ~ ~.1~
~1 T~ Tr~I ~ D~ 8~ to ~ ~ 4D ~ 1.3 ~.~ ~.~ 27.4~ S6.7~ ~ ~ ~ S10.~
U~I Ta~ Tr~l ~ N~ ~ to ~ ~ R ~ ~ 1.7 45.1~ ~.~ 19.~ ~ ~19 S~ ~ ~A19
U~I T&~ Tr~l N~h ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 4D ~ 1~ ~.~ ~.~ ~ ~S~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U~I T~ Tr~l N~ V~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ 4D ~ ~2 37~ 61.~ 5~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ~
· ~ U~I T~Tr~N~ ~dO~.~~ ~ ~ 0.4 ~ 78.1~ .8.~ ~ ~ ~ S5.~ ~.~
~ ~ ~ V~ B~h ~. O~e ~. lo ~1 ~ 4D 1.4 1~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ V~ ~h ~. U~I to ~ ~. 0 ~ Z2 0 19.4~ 42.~ S2.1~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~
~ 19-Mar-92
~ ~ ~ V~ ~ ~ S101.40
-
· , lmm
listed tn Table 3-2 correspond to road ~npro~'ements identified in the County's
current Comprehensive Plan Annual Update and Inventory Rt:pon. They have been estimated to add
!' I,$89,$20 vehicle-miles per da)' of service capacity to the road system. At a cost of $161,181,000, the
cost to construct each vehicle.mile of capacity is $101.40. Using an assumption of 8,685 vehicles per
lane pet day (consistent with the current Inlpact l'~t), this amounts to S8g0,677 pet lane-mile of servlce
.'capacity.
Considcrafio n was g~vcn to the im plJcafions of different tra~c g row~ rates and dUTcrent build-out time
. pcfiodsonthcurdtcost. ThcsevarhblescanalTccttheunhcosti/thenced for high-cost items that y~cld
relatively small capacity Increases appear in the higher growth rate or longer, term planning horizon.
These hsues were considered because recent tra~c count data has indicated growth may have slowed
:: during the past ),cat. This observation seems conshtent ~th recent econondc Indications, but has not
been confirmed by reviewing building pcrrrdt issuance.
. The cost per lane-mile of road improvements needed through 1996 and through 2000 were evaluaged
using the s~tme procedures Lljustrated in Table 3-2. In addMon to considering the cost pet lane-mile
~i based on tra~c growth estimates incorporated into the tra~c cLreulafion clement of Collier County's
' Comprehensive Plan (6.0 percent per year through 2000), the cost per lane.rrdle was considered using
~rowth rates of 85 pcrcc,q and ?0 percent o£ those Incorporated into the County's Tra~c CLrculation
F_Jcrncnt (eg., 5.2 percent and 4.5 percent pet year, respectively). The cost pet lane.mile varied from
$833,921 to $990,852. Assoch~d with these estlmatcs is an average saturation level of 73.6 percent.
Worksheets s~lat to Table 3-2, documenting these computations, are provided in Appendix C.
~ Du~in8 the public discussion of the impact fcc schedule, a draft report containing a cost pet lane-mile
o fS854,170 was distn'buted wtdch formed the basis for discussions. This cost is within the range ofcosts
~ per lane-mile cst~natcd for vadous growth scenarios, and a fcc schedule based on this unit cost was
... adopted by thc Board of County Commissioners. Thus, all subsequent analyses and tables In this report
· arc based on Sg$4,170 cost per lane-halle.
.~Tin cl.,de 27 Collier County
~,Oli~r and A~¢oc~ale~ /nc. Tran. V~rtatlon lmlx'tcl Fee UlxJam StudJ'
The adopted cost pcr Inne mile ts 82.9 percent greater than the S467.~ incorporated ~to Ihe cur~nl
f~. ~e Mgm.er cost b mo~ ~=lbt~, ~t~g the costs orurban road construction. ~e Mgher cost
wUI ha~ a subs~nt~l eff~t on ~e u~n~ed ~ct f~ rat~.
CHAPTER FOUR
REVENUE CREDIT
The credit component of the impact fa equation r~cognizes the contribution towards road system
expansion a de'~elopment will make through Its payment ofoth ~r transportation funding mechanisms,
For ex,,topic, t~ips to and from the new development will consume gasoline and therefore ~enerate
gasoline tax revenues. A portion of the gasoline tax revenue is usually used to construct new roads or
expand existing roads. Thus, new development will generate some amount o f avenue to build the roads
its associated t~avel consumes. Failure to recognize th,'*e cred)ts will resuh in the new development
paying twice for the roads - once in the impact fee and again when a portion of its taxe~ ar= direct~l
to construct n~v roads.
The agencies that normally fund road construction ar= the four levels of government: Federal, State,
County, s. nd Ci~. Revenues that these agencies will allocate to road construction in Collier County
ar~ traditionally d,rived prima.,ily from gasoline taxes and to a minor degree from vehicle license tag
fees. Recently, however, additional taxes and fees have been adopted by the Florida legislatu~whlch
w~l provide cuba,ced revent~ to maintain and improve the transportation system. These sources
include Increased gasolhe tax~ swcharges on mnlal automobiles, and impact fees on the introduction
of nc'w automohil,:s to Florida.
In the sections tha~ follow, the procedures and asst,nptlons ~ed to estimate these credits am discu.,~sed.
Gnsollne Tax and L~cense Tag Fee. Credits
The portion of gasoline taxes that government agencies u.se to construct roads is credited to land
.dew. lopments in proportion Io the amount of travel they generate. The annual value ofgasollne tax
revenues for non-lnler~tate road construction was estimated using the following equation:
' _l~r~p r'a~el rl'oln! trlp len_t, lh) (Percen! new Irl.r)s_l ~Dn_vs~_.enr) (Capitsl pennle~ l~r _~nllon) 2 (lvliles per gallon)
Trip tart: = number ol'dail)' trips $cnerat~:d per unit ol'de¥clopmcnt.
Totzd trip length = total trip length, inclu,Jinl~ local and Ir~terstate components,
Day,year = elTective days per year or op.'radon,
Capit:d pennies per gallon = number ot'pe~,nles ol'gasoline tax per,allon or'gasoline consunted
that are used £or transportation system e~:pansion,
Miles per gallon = fuel el'~ciency o£the motor vehicle fleet usln8 the publ;c road system.
The trip rate and percent new trips variables t'or each land use are the sa~e variables used to estimate
the travel d,=)and. Thc trip length, however, includes the Inter. flare and local street component
travel because gasoline is consumed and gasoline taxes are paid regardless ot' the type o£ toad being
driven on. The local strut trip length was estimated as 0.96 mile, as documented in Chapter Three.
Travel Demand Charactcristlcs.
~For all land us~ an elT~cdve 365 days per year 01'operation was a~sttmcd. This will not be I~e case £ot
~II land uses, as some uses operate only on weelcda).s (e.g. ot'fice buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g.
schools). Use o£365 days per year provides a "con.qervadve" element, ensuring that gasoline tales am
adequately credited against the lee.
The ~u=~bet ol'pennles pet gallon that return to the communlty £or non. Interstate capital improvements
lmm l:'ederal ~n cl State sources was estimated by consulting the Florida DOT Six-Year Work Program
adopted .luly 1, 1991. This Wotlc Program indicated $$1.2 million o££acility expansion Funds would
be available over a six year period (~iseal year 1991 through fiscal )'tar 1996), £or an average o1'S8.$
million per year. This level oF Fund[ns includes revenues expected l'rom all sources (including "per
gallon" based laxes, thc license l'ee, rental car surcharge, and new a',,to impact Fees) that are planned l'or
system capacity enhancement. Using in£ormatlon From the ]9~0 St;tee Revenue ~timating Conl'erence,
one cent o£gamlinc tax in Collier County is estimated to gcneratc an average o£S824,863 ol'revenue
over the sane time period. Using these averages, an equivalent o£ ]0.3 cents per gnilon ol'gasollne will
be allocated to transporlatlon system capacity expansion over the next five years.
The County is considering a pollcy dctcrmt~ation that it will all'cate all of its gasoline tax rc~cnu¢ to
o~rndon o~]ts road s)~tem, except ~or th~ "Sth and 6th cents~, which t~ statutorJly
to capit~ ~ac~ily construction. A ~vlew oC the City o~ Napl~ Capital Improvement
~cment ~dicnlcd no facility expansion ~pro~menu a~ contemplated, and ~e~Fo~ no munkipal
~m~ncn~ o~gMol~c tax credi~ was a~ed.. ~ uL the total ~fi~lcnt ga~llne tax ~it ~r gallon
e~g~ol~e applied Io ~e u~ed ~pact ice ~ 12.3 cents.
A ~a~ prolcon o~vchicle ~ccn~ tag ~ ~ also allocated ~or ~ns~nation capital ~nditu~.
~ Co~icr Co~ty's ~nt ~o~a~on ~pact f~, and ~ o~ct ~pact [~ ~oughoul ~e stnt~
~e credit for ~cense ~g [~ ~ eUocated to land ~ on ~e bas~ o[~c ~1 d~ a~ia~ with
~e land ~e. ~e vehicle ~n~ tag [~ ~nues a~ ~cludcd ~ t~c state work ptog~m, and thcre~o~
a~ ~cluded ~ ~e 12.3 ~nt cq~valcnt gesol~e tax credit cst~atcd a~vc. ~u~ ~ey a~ not
~ as a sc~te com~ncnt nfc~dit ~ t~s u~ate study.
:: The ~el e~clcncy o£03e fleet ofvehicles ~ing the publlc htghway system has been e~timated by several
agcncies~ with values ranging from 18 miles pc/gallon (Tren~.r, or~nfion Research Record // ! 1 ,~
"Ttansl:.ortation Energy", TRB, 1987) to 20 mi]es pet gallon (Florida Transportation Estimating
Conference, October 31,1989). In the interest ofassurlng an adequate gasoline tax credit, the lower fuel
efficiency valu~ o£ 18 miles per gallon is recommended.. This value will provide larger gasoline tax
credits than if higher values are applied.
~::: The present value o£the annually recurring credits for a 25 year period were computed, assuming an
f~?" · annual interest rate of seven percent to compute the total amount of the credit. A 25 year period was
selected becau.,~e it/s thc commonly accepted life of a roadway and it corresponds to the time period £or
which road improvement bonds are frequently issued.
:~'~.~,: Il'the County implements additional revenue programs to fund needed roads, these sources should be
recognized and the impact fee credits should be updated.
CllAPTER FIVt~.
IMPACT FEIZ SCIlF:.DUL'ES
Usini the information developed in the previous three chapters ol'this report, two lml~u:t fee schedules
sere developed for consideration by the Board o1' County Commissioners. The first lee sched~de,
provided in Table 5-1, is the I'ec schedule adopted by Collie~ Count),. Il is based on an average system
performance factor o£ 1.00. The second tee schedule, presented in Table 5-2, consld~rs the average
system performance factor o1'0.736. This second tee schedule was not adopted. Both preliminary tee
schedules indicate increases in the fees rot most land uses. For example, the lee l'or a single-family home
would be I.? to 2.8 limes the current lee rot a single.family home. Generally, increases are proposed
£or m~my land uses; however, reductions in the tee charged are proposed I'or some land uses. Because
the curr~nt transportation impact tee lacks specific lees for a variety or non. r~sidenlial land uses, a
quantitative ;ener~liz~tion about the degree of increase is nol possible.
The substantial increases are not surprising, and are similar to findinSs ormore recent im pact fee studies
in other central Florida communities. The princij~al reasons rot these increases are round in the Ion;er
trip lengths and higher unit construction costs. In some cases, updated trip rate data also contributed
lo ~c~'e.~,ed ~pact tee mt~
:, :~dthough for some land uses the adopted lee schedule is significantly greater than the current fee
schedule, the £e~s charged to each land use represent a more equitable allocation o£costs and credits
than the current adopted lee schedule. Improved equity has been achieved as a result orstudies that
have bee~ conducted since lhe current lee was adopted.
COLLIER TRANSPORTATiON IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
Adopted lee $chedulo
Fee Schedule Au,mptlona:
Re~ential:
~ ~ ~ 3,3 4.6 6.2 I~ ~ $21 S247 $4S5 nli
/ R~ear/on:
~ ~ Collar Count).
i:" Table 5-1 (Continued)
COLLIER TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
~'~ ~ Adopted Fee Schedulo
Reta8 (~ntinueO)
~: ~s~
I
COLLIER TRANSPORTATiON IMPA CT FEE SCHEDULE
Alternate Fee $.chedul(~
~ ~ du 4J 38 4,3 1C~
L~;'
II I
Table 5-2 (Continue(I)
COLLIER TRANSPORTATION IMPA CT FEE SCHEDULE
Alternate Fee Schedule
Trip Trip THp New
~ I.G,G l~l 1.~0 If ~l.I 30 4.8 10~ ~.73~
~ ~ufi~ I,~Q II~S.4 2.0 2.7 73~ Sl0.271 I407 ~,~S Sl3.478 ~,244
1.KO d 12S.I 2.1 I.I ~
~ ( ~ d ~ I~.l 1.3 2.0 ~ ~,la I1.~1
M~M~ 1.~0~ ~.l 2.4 ~t ~ ~.m
l~d 161~ 2.4 ~I ~
~ ~ I.~0 d ~.f 1.8 2,l ~ S17.4M
W~NING: lhll be KhKu~ WlI NOT Id~,
CIIAPTER SIX
~: :. REVENUE PROJ E~'TIO~I
To enable Collier County to address £uture capital needs funding, an estimate of the revenues that may
be ~'nerated bg' the proposed Impact fee scheduk's a.ld from traditional gasoline tax was pref~red, By
'. comparinL', expected revenues with expected road needs, the appropriate magnitude o£ the
transportation impact f~e rates and/or the need to pursue other rc~nue sources can be identli'~-d. The
costs of road improvements nece~ary to meet Comprehensive Plan performance standards was
estimated and identilled for s~veral growth rates and planning horizons in C'napter Three. In this
chapter, those needs are compared with revenue estimates of the two preliminary fee schedules presented
in Chapter Five.
The methodology to estimate impact fee revenues was to review historical housing development trends
and the fees a~cs.sed to the homes and relate {hem to the total impact lee revenues collect,ed. A
j ~.lationshlp was established and £uture fee revenues were estim,,ted by applying the relationship to
pro.~ecdons ot'£ut ~re housing development under the assumption that thc relationship will remain valid.
' The housing trend in_rormatlon was ebtained from "Demographic and Economic Pro£de of Collier
! ' C~unty, FloHda" revised November, 1990, bytheCollierCountyGrowthPlanningDepartment. Table
18 of thls report summarizes the number o£Certiflcates of Occupancy (CO's) issued for single-family,
rnulti-£arnily, duplex, and mobile home dwellings annually since 1 ?,~0. 'l'hts data suggests a trend that
the proportion orsingle-£amily CO's has increased slightly over the past ten years, with some degree o1'
oscillation.
~.. ,.Table 19 of this report sun,,mari~es spproved Planned Unit Dex~lopment (PUD's) in Collier Counly
and the numbers ofsingle-versus muld.£amily unlts approved. It indicates that only 1 g pereent o£ the
approi,'ed units nrc single-Family. This information would suggest the proportion o£single.£amily CO's
would decrease in the future; however, Growth Planning Department slaffhave indicated that several
~/~/~. $7 Collier Court
Ol.;,~r and A.t¢oc~tt~, /nc. 7'r,?n,'port:~/.~n ,tn~.~c.t F~ l l/xfJte Stud.}'
PUD developers ha~ recently requested chang¢~ from muhl.to s~ngle, family ~lwellings. In lighq of the
inf<~rmation, single-family d~:llings were assigned to be 31 percent or the total dwelling
· unt~ that will pay impact lets through 2000.
,:i'. :~ Estimatm ol'the dwellings to be constructed were provided in Table 15 ot the above reference. T~ese
~.~ estimates were prep·md by the Collier County Growth Planning Department. For the revenua
projection, dwelling construction o£ the Royal Fakapalm and Big Cypress planning districts w~re
,-' .. excluded bec·eLse no road improvement needs huve been estimated in the;oe districts through 2000.
A ttwiew ol'the impact lee revenues generated by single and multi-family units venus total impact tees
collected tor 1987 through '! 991 has indicated residential development has generated 70 percent o1' the
total £ees collected - non-residential development accounting £or the balance. In the past, several
develope~ have dedicated right.of-way or offered road construction in lieu of payin8 impact tees, or
hav~ negotiated unique tees because no land use category existed in the current lee schedule that was
applicable to the development, Taus, no cash was received by the County £or these developments and
i the total impact Ice revenues recorded by the Cot~hty are less than the total value ol'£ees collected plus
.. other impact mitigation arrangements in lieu o£fee payment.
· " ~ Through discu.t.sions with County staff, a rate of 45 percent o1' the residential lee was agreed upon as
· reasonable means ol'estlmating non-residential impact lee revert ues. The im pact lee revenue estimates
are repo ,r}ed in Tables 6-I through 6-3. These revenue estimat~ correspond to the lee schedule adopted
by the County Commission in Tobit $-1, and the three growth rates evaluated £or toad improvement
needs are discu-,~d in Cb·peet Three. The net present value o£ revenues £rom i 991 through 1996 and
through 2000 are reported. As should be expected, the estimates bas.-d on lower growth rates and lower
tee schedules are lower than those based on higher growth rates and higher lee schedules. The impact
tee revenue estimates are S27.2 million between 1991 and 1996, and I;39.8 million between 1991 and
2000. Thus, significant revenues can be generated by impact tees for road construction.
Collier Coun c~.
Impact Foe Revenue Estimate
Adopted Fee. Schedule, Comp Pl~]'n Growth
SDU MDU SOU M~ E~,M~ ~lmat~1)
1~2 1~ 3745 SI.379 S9~ S2.~ ~3.501 ~.~I
1~ 1~2 3745 S1.379 S9~ S2.3~ ~3.501 ~.~t ~.,1
.~ 1~ I~2 3745 S1.379 S9~ S2.~ ~].501 ~.~I
' 19~5 1~ 3745 S1.379 $9~ ;2.~ ~3.~01 ~.821
~ 1~ 1587 ~32 S1.379 S9~ S2.188 S3.3Q2 ~.4~ S7.9~
I~7 1587 ~ $1,379 S9~ S2,1~ S:).302 ~,4~ S7,960
1~ 1587 ~ $I,379 $9~ S2,1M ~,~2 ~.4~ $7,9~
1~ 1~7 ~ 51.379 $9~ $2,1M ~,302 ~,4~
~ 1587 ~32 $I .379 $9~ $2.1M ~1,~2 ~.4~ S7,~
1991-1996 NPV: S24,879 ~,792
~,, 1991-~ N~: ~7,2~ ~.759
1, B~ ~ 1.45 tlm~ t~lntially-generat~
· ?.:: ~ . ~tl~ ~nty Offal of Or~h ~nnJng
~':~ ~alo-~ a~ ~lat~ I~ 1991
~1.~1
Table 6-2
Impact Foe Revenue Est[mate
T~al
R~nue
. ~ MDU SDU MI~ ~,M~ ~tlmat~l)
. Y~r SDU M~ F~ Fei R~nue R~)nue R~ ~1.~
1~1 14~ 31~ ~19 ~30 $1,171 S1,~9 ~,~0 ~,101
' 1~ 1~ 31~ Sl ,3~ $9~ Sl ,972 S2',976 ~.~8 S7,175
1~ 1~ 31~ Sl,379 S9~ SI,972 S2,976 ~,~8 S7,175
1~ 14~ 31M Sl,379 $9~ Sl,972 S2,976 ~,~8 S7,175
1~5 14~ 3183 S1,379 S9~ S1,972 $2,976 ~,~8 S7,175
19~ I ~9 ~ S 1,3~ $9~ Sl ,860 S2,807
1~7 I~9 ~2 $1,3~ $9~ Sl,660 $2.807 ~,666 $6,766
1998 1349 ~2 SI,379 $9~ Sl,860 $2,807 ~,~6 $6,766
1999 1349 3~2 $1,379 S9~ S~,860 $2,~7 ~,666 ~6,76~
~ 1~9 ~2 $1,379 S9~ S1,860 S2.607 ~,~
~:: 1991-1996 NPV: $21,147 ~1.98~
1991-2~ NP~
~' H~ 1. B~ ~ 1.45 IIm~ r~entlally-genaral~
~ Z I~t r~ue ~ actual Ir~ W 19~-199t.
~IiM C~nty elliot of GroMh ~annlng
~all-~et l~ ~lalel. I~. 1991
3 ~ CEI~r Co un t~'
~ Table 6-3 ,
,~, Impact Fee Revenue Estimate
~, , Adopted Fee Schedule. 7'O~b of Comp Plan Growth
SDU MDU SDtJ MDLI BOU,MOU
Year SDU MOU Fee Fee Revenue Revt.~ue Fleveflua
;~" ?. 1991 117a 2621 ~19 $430 sgE,~ s1.127 s2.092 ~,101 (2)
~ 1992 1178 [~21 S1,379 $:135 SI,624 S2.451 ~,075 ~,~
..~ 1993 1178 2621 S1,379 t6~ S1,624 $2.451 ~.0?S
1~ 1178 ~2t $1,379 S9~ S1,~4 $2.451 ~,075 ~,~
1~ 1178 ~21 $1.=~ $9~ S1,624 $2.451 ~,075 ~,~
1~ 1111 2472 $1,379 S~ t15~ $2.311 $3.~3
1~7 1111 2472 Sl,3~ S9~ tl~ $2,311 ~.~3 ~.572
1~ 1111 24~ $1.379 $9~ &1~32 $2.311 ~,~3 ~,572
~ 1111 2472 $1,3~ S9~ $1,532 $2,311 $3,~3 ~.572
1~1-1996 NP~ $17.415
1991-~ N~: $26,~9 $39.761
1. Ba~ ~ 1.~ tlm~ rM~eNialt~generat~ t~nu~
~ ~n~ ~t of Gr~h
~af~ a~ ~lat~ I~. 1991
~12'~: OgolBe ~i Rx~u~ for road cons~cdon wffi not ~ as dk~dy afl. ted by growth as ~ct
' ~n~ a~. ~L~ ~ ~a~ ~e majo~Jt~ ofgasol~e tax re.hues a~ gen~ated by ~o~ ~ady
~ } ~g ~ CoUi~ Co~ty. Us~8 ~e ~e n~r 0feq~lent ~nni~ ~r gallon ofgasol~e
to ~ d~md ~to road cons~cdon tdtn~ed ~ ~aplet Four (12.3 ~n~).
}, proj~io~ pre.md by Co~ier County, and fleet htl efficiency and hcl sales slathd~ provid~ ~ ~e
'-; ~odda Department of Transpo~tlon, gasol~e tax m~nues that may ~ available for road
"' ' cons~cgon ~:m ~ated. ~e ~a~ am re.ned ~ Table 6~ through 6-5.
Table ~? com~ms ~e cos~ orroad ~provement n~ds with the re~:nues that would ~ ex.ted from
· e vagous gro~ah ~cnafios t~tcd. ~ the ~ ofgro~xh slows, the funding n~ds also dow. but the
~n~ n~a~ from ~pact f~ d~l~e mo~ dramatically, For example, the Compmhen~i~ Plan
[~h rates will mquke S 127 m~lion oF road construction through 1996, S60 million o~ ~is amount
. ~le 46'
:' Olh~r and A~/at~. Inc. Tran.~rtatlon Im~ct F~ ~ate Stud),
Gasoline Tax Revenue Estimates
Comprehensive Plan Growth Rates
Elfectlve Ne~vo~ Fuel VI, ZT from Tax I~om V~T I~m Tax Imm VI4T from Tax Item
Year Efficiency Estimate Facloe' Flate Tr'~ Trav~ ~ Deve~:~:xne~ Dev~opmenl Deve, lol~tent Tala~
1~1 15.46 4.~9~,405 0.999 0.123 ~$9.S~9 S310 3.T~l .T20 5~0.152 ~07.I~6 ~
1992 15,824.514.801 0.999 . 0.123 171,562 $342S326 3.726.1743'728'947 59,91359.719 921,438614'292 51,633S2A(~ 512ASS$tI'BT2
1993 16.134,831,198 0.998 0.123 183,586
1994 1&35 .~. 147.5.~4 O.~JT 0.123 1 ~.~0C) 53G0 3.723.462 S(J,578 1,223,583 S3.1G0 S13.ocJ~
1995 16.505,463.990 0.996 0.123 207,632 S378 3,720,629 S9,484 1.53S.72~ S3.915 S13.7T7
1996 16.61 5,780.386 0.996 0.~123 219,655 $396 3,717,856 59.413 1,642,87S S4,EE~ 514,477
1997 16.746,066,037 0.995 0.123 230.SG9 S414 3,71S,093 $9,~ 2.120,44S ~,~.0
1998 16.886,351,689 0.994 0.123 241,364 S430 3,712.310 $9,252 2,398,014 S5,977 $1S,ESg
1 (jgcj 17.036,637,340 0.994 0.123 252.219 $445 3.709,537 59.162 2.675,684 S6,604 S16,215'
2GOG 17.186,922.992 0.993 0.123 263.074 $461 3.706.764 Sg,0TT 2,953.154 S7.231
NM P~esent VMu~ 19cj1-1996c $1,E64 $46,421 $12,480
NM P~M~nt Va/u~ 1991o2~00: ~ S~7,219 S26,548 S96.416
C4M County Transp~ SMYiCeS Divisk)n
~. T~ble 6-5
~ Gasoline Tax Revenue Estimates
· .~ 8595 of Comp Plan Growth Rates
F. flecth~ Netwo~ Fuel VMT bom Tax Item VMT from Tax I~om vMT from Tax Item
Calendar Fuel TAS VMT VMT Tax Ext-Ext Extor~t ~ Ex!~tng New Ne~
~ Yea~ Efficiency Estimate Facto~ Rate Tra~l Tra~l ~ Dev~X~ct~ Devek~omem ~ To~als
~ (ming) (~al) (~)3.e~,) (sl.0(q (SI.000) (Sl.O(xT) (si.000)
1990 15.183.~**.009 1.GOO 0.123 147.516 S292 3.734.,493 $10.349 0
'~:~:) 1991 15.464.150.946 0.999 0.12:3 157.736 S307 3.731.720 $10.152 261.490 $711 SI 1.17'3
~ 1992 15.824.419.B83 0.999. 0.123 167.956 S319 3,726.1743'728'947 $9.91359.719 522.9e07'o4.470 $1.390S2~.46 $11.623512.097
~ 1993 16.13 4,6~,8,619 0.996 0.123 '1~'17~
S12.615
~. 1994 1G.,3S 4,957,756 0.997 0.123 188,395 S347 3,723,402
S9,S78
~ 199~ 1G.50 S,,22G,6~2 0.996 0.123 196,614 S3G2 3'720.~29 S9,484 1,307,449 S3,333 S13,178
~ 1996 1G.61 S,495,E29 0.996 0.123 208,834 3378 3'717,~G S9,413 1,.568~39 S3,973 S 13.764
~ ~] 1997 1G. 74 5,738,433 0.995 0.123 218,,0G0 S392 3,715,063 S9,3."~
.:= 'lg~J ! ~. o.,~,-S,.~,,~, O.~r~4 0.123 227,2~7 $405 3,712,310 $9,252 2,041,640 SS,C)O8 SI4.74G
'~ 17.03 6,224,041 0.994 0.123 2'36,514 S418 3,709,537 S9,162 2,277.,,990 S5,,E2~ S1S,206
1999
I .~ ~ 17.18 6.466.845 0.993 0.123 24S.740 S430
2~,14,340
S6.1S7
S15.~S4
3.706.764
S9.077
.~ $10.62~
~ Ne( Presen~ V~ue 1991-1996: S1.~11 S46.421
.~-
~ Ngl P~4nl Yalue 1991-2Q00: S2,537 S67.219
~ C(xJmy Transi:)c)rh~lJcw~ ~ ~
.~-~,
Gasoline Tax Revenue Estimates
70~ of Comp Plan Growth Rates
Elfecth~ Ne4wo~ Fuel VMT from T~ frem Vi. IT from Tax from Vt.4T from Tax Item
Ca~ Fuel TAS ~ VMT Tax E~-Ext F. xt-Ext ExisU~ F. xlstl~g
y~ Efltr. J~ Esth~ate Fact~ Rate Travel Tra~ Dev~lot:)~nt Devek::~m~nl Develol~ ($1.000) ($1000)
$10.349 0
19~J0 1,5.16 3,882,009 1.000 0.12.3 147..516 ~2 3,734.493 $11,0~3 I
1991 15.46 4.103.487 0.999 0.12~ 155.9~2 ~ 3./~j1.720 $10.152
1992 15.82 4 .124 .,q~4 0.99~ 0.12~ 164.149 3,312 3.72B,947 $9.913 431,~ $1,14B $11.173
181.181 ~ 3.~.~ S9~78 ~ ~ S1~1~
1~ 16.~ 4~ 0.~ ~1~ 1~ ~ 3.~,~ $9.4M 1.0~.I~
1~ 1~61 5~10J~ 0~ [1~ 1~13 ~ 3.717~ ~.413
1~ I1.M 5,610,7~1 0,~ ~I~ ~ ~ 3.~ $9,1~ 1~ ~ ~1~,1~
S!4~5g
~ 1~.18 ~.010.~ 0.~ ~1~ ~.~ ~ ~.~.7~ ~.~ 2.0~ ~'~
N~ ~ V~ 1~1-1~ ~1~9 ~6.421
~ ~ale_~~l~.~ 1~1
Summary of Needs, System Performance, and Revenues
Ois Tax Impac!
~990-1996 Estimates:
PM AUI~IE [1) S1~,~t 0,~7 ~ ~2 S97,~7
1990-~0 Est/mates:
Table 6-8
Estimated Revenue Needs
Based on VMT Added
Re~nue
VMT VMC N~ded
Added Needed ($1,000's)
Comp Plan Gro~h 856,974 1,164,367 $114.515
85~ of Comp Plan Growth 741,880 1,007,989 $99,136
70~ of C~p Plan Growth 608.540 826.821 $81,31 B
199~2000:
Comp Plan Growth 1,388.048 1,685.935 $185.482
' 85~ ol Comp Plan Growth 1,177,784 1,600,250 $157,385
70~ of C~ Plan Growth 967,519 1,314,564 $129,287,
Source: ~ndale-Oliver and A~o~ates. In¢ 1992
Rlename: TAB6-ERN.wkl ~2-AW-92
Trans~rtat~n lm~ct F~ U~at~ Stud)'
Baseline taxes and other committed establi~h~ revenue sources. To meet thc revenue
.... nec. ds, impact fees and other rc~'enuc sources must generate the r~snalntng $67 million. However, il'the
~rowth rates decline to'/0 percent et'the ComprchensNe Plan rate~, construction needs amount to only
$~ mtll~on, and impact Ices and other revenue sources need to only lcnerate $31 m~ltion. Based on
these estimttes, it appears a det'~ns~ble transportation impact lees, g~soline taxes, and other committed
revenue se~zrc~ can provide the majority of' rcvcn.es nec~s~ry to m::intain the road network in
accordance vdth the standards ofthe adopted Comprehensive Plan,
;' ,', A second approach to ctuent~yin$ arterial and c~llector road Funding needs through 199~ and through
·: 2000 was s~so considered. This apprc~ach was to quantR'y the increase in vehicle-mi~es el'travel from
~94~0 to 199~ end to 2000 and then additional cnpaclty needed to m~nta~n the current overall quality
o£ the current sTstem performance. For ever7 vehlcle-mile oF ~ra¥cl added to the non-local, non-
Interstate read sTstcm within the urban -,rca, it is necessary to add 1.3~ (i/0.736) vehicle-miles of'service
czpachy to mtin~atn the existing condition. Usin~ an average cost or $~.35 per vehicle-nUJe of
, c~p~dty, 03e needed cx~nditurecan bc estimated. The results of`these estimates are provided in Table
6-~, and co.tm the revenue needs est~ated through ~996 in Chepter Three based on estimated
d~dcnc~cs.
i' Through 2000, however, the estimates based on YMT added exce.-d the estimates based on est[mated
deficiencies. An overall worsening of`congestion (from an average saturation level of`'/3 percent in 1~0
to 75 and 76 percent by 2000 is the reset of'the lowe~ funding levels. These dLrrcrences occur in the
latter~l:all' o£ the current planning period, and should be revle~cd with each Comprehensive Plan
Upda~ma~ing usc of more current planning projections and techniques available at that time.
'.-,-~';.... ~ a final issue in the consideration of'an appropriate imp.~ct lee schedule, the fees charl~ed by other
nearby jurlsdictions for representative land uses were surveyed. The results ol. the survey are presente~l
in Table 6.9. The adopted lees are comparable to those ol'jurisdktions which have recently updated
their fee schedules, but are higher than those whose lees have been in place longer,
~'~!~ ~ 45 Collier Cou.O.
,O/i~l:r a~d As~oc~tc~. /nc.
0,52
Table 6--9
Comparison of Other Jurisdiction Fees
CHAPTER 7
BENEFIT DISTRICTS
e~tablished by prior legal cases in Florida, impact f~e~ must benefit those who ~y. Impact
dg~cu am ~quently created by the core,unities enacting ~ct f~ oral,nags. ~e
o~an~ ~u~ that f~ coll~t~ with~ a dht~t ~ used to fund capital ~pro~mcn~ within a
~1 p~cedents ~ ca~ l~w d~ not mandate ~e ~e of th~ district, but d~c~ a~ an
~atlon fac~ifi~ For ~ple. unl~ tolls a~ coll~t~ for ~ ofs~c fa~ifi~ dfix~
~cted a~s to ag public roads ~ Co~ier Co~ty. Some land ~ have shorter ~Wlea~s than
and the geog~phical extent to which l~al st~tg coll~ton, m~ot anefialg ot p~cipal
~ m us~ w~! va~ due to d~erenc~ ~ ~e avenge t~length and I~adon ofvafio~ land
· e ~c~xy of ma~c~g pa~eat o~ ~pagt f~ to ~e ~nefit of const~cfion of roadway
~g a ge~e~l~ed ~a~oa~iP m~z ~ ~d ~o'approx~ate fl~t conn~tioa of~e ~ent.Xo the
it d~o~ tu ~i~ ~cz f~ ord~ancg Collier Co~t~ adopted ele~n (! 1) ~nefi~
of~ ~a~na~on ~pact f~ u~a~e study, ~e orlg~al ~nefit dh~ic~ ~ evalual~
~nsiderafion of mod~g ~e e~g ~aefit dhtrict ~undafi~ In evalua6ng ~e ~nt
~cu. ~e folZo~g vafiabg~ weg anti,ed: natu~l or man-~de ~dafi~
homog~ei~ of~e ~h~g and pro~d land ~, and ~e adm~trative s~pliclty. ~e following
~g~p~ disc~s ~e c~te~a.
l~atural and/or Man-Made Bnundarle~
The land use map for Collier County indicates that areas ol'envltonmental concern are one of the most
sJgnil~cant natural designations within the County. Conservation areas and lands that have been
I'~lul~d for conservation make up a significant portion o£ the Co unly. The majority or the ~outheast
~ 47 Coil~er County
section o£Colller County has be~n designated as areas orenvironmcntni concern, and land that h.~s been
'?acqulred for conservation makes up a major portion of the southeast part ol'the County,
A second ~ct of boundaries desi~lnated on the land use map is the City of Naples and Everglades City.
These are raan.nmdc boundaries, showing the incorporated city ILmlts.
Homogeneity or ~ti~tln_e ned ~ropo~ed l-nnd
Revicwlng the future land use map, as adopted on January 10, 1989, indicates the County's land use is
broken into fairly homogeneous areas. Four predominant categories of land use are indicated. First,
~c most significant designation is areas ofenviroamental concern. The east and southeast sections of
thc County are designated as areas of environmental concern. Second, is the urban residential
designation, including the western portion of Collier County, excluding Naples and.the Rookery Bay
Natural Estuary reserve. The County's urban residential area h shown to be reasonably compact in the
western sections of the County, excluding the small, urban, residential area of Immokalee, which is
located in the northeast portion ortho County. The third predominant land use designation is
City
of Naples, whk:h is predominantly urban in use. The fourth area that is designated are the commercial
Itrtivity centers. These commercial activity centers are located at major highway nodes, principatly
along US 41, AL-pon Road, Interstate 75 and County Road 951. All of these activity centers are
located ~dthin the western, urban portion of the County which has an urban-residential designntion.
2qone of the activity centers are located within agricultural-designations of the County.
Given that the more intense land us~ designations are concentra!ed in the western portion of the County
and the less intense agricultural and conservation uses are concentrated in the eastern portion of the
County, it is apparent that fewer and larger districts should be contained in the eastern portion of the
County, and that smaller districts should be contained within the western, urbanized area of the
County. Larger, less compact, benefit districts are appropriate in the en.~t portion of the County, and
smaller, more compact benefit are appropriate to the urban development trend~ in the x~tern part of
the County.
' "Ol~ and.4&~ociJt~ /nc. ..... Tr~n.cportatlon /mix?ct Fe~ U~te Sru~.
The County currently has eleven impact fee benefit disu'icts, Thh number of benefit districts has not
been burdensome to the County as far a~ administrative functions and accounting requi~ts are
concerned. However, any reduction tn the numbe~ of benefit distric~ if done properly, could reduce
the administrative effort to maintain the accounts for each benefit district.
· :' Anothc~ consideration in the .number of districts that are cur~ntly adopted by the County is the
· reduced fe~u'bility In admlnls~rlng a trsnsportationimpact fee construction program. With the number
of impact tee ~istricts curro~dy adopted, the flexibility to fund road improvements within various
Jeographlc areal of the County h somewhat Umiled, A reduction In the number of benefit dhtrlcts
would not only reduce thc admi~strative costs, but would also increase the fexibllit~ to adn~aister a '
transportation impact fee cons~'uction progrtm.
:: i After ~-wlewtng the above tssucs, elght benefit districts are proposed for Collier County. Fi~'~tre %!
:i~ Iljustrates the c~iht proposed districts, as well as ~e boundaries ofthe existing districts for comp,~ratlve
purpose~, Thc changes that are being recommended are the combining of exlsting distflcu one and two
into a new disu~ct, district three and five into a new district, and districts seven and ten into a new
.district. Propos~ district cisht (the combination o£exlstin~ districts seven and ten) could be considered
an exemption district. It is proposed that no im~ct fee would be collected in this district because il is
lar$cly ~mdcvelopable and no road improvemenr.s were e~t~matcd In this area through 2000. By
c~nbin~g three pairs of existing districts and m~ing a total of eight disu'icts for Collier County, the
admlnislration of the collection and accounting s~s~em should be less burdensome, and more flexibility
· in the admlnlst~stion of the transporlation capital improvement program will be achieved. Thc
followin$ table s~ramarlzes the relationship of the existing and proposed benefit distrlcls:
' ' To summarlzc our recommendation, the conserv~gon trea to the ~utheast, maklns up approxlmatcly
'~ ~0 pe~,;~.ht of the total Cottllly's land mass area, is proposed lo be an exemption distrlcL Tw~ large
~ ate recommended In the north sections of thc County. The urbanized wcstcm portion otthe
County, which ma.kcs up approx~atcly 20 percent o£the County land area, is recommended to have
· three tran~or~ation [mpac~ fcc dL~trk~. ~nally, thc two ~ncorporated portions o£thc County would
remain as districr~ (Naplcs and Ever~ladcs City) with the corporate boundarics beIng the benefit district
'i[-~ boundari~
~. Hawns the non-urbanized areas w~th large benefit dmncis and the urbanized area with smaller bmcfit
distrlct~ will allow proo£ o£1:~n¢fit to b~ monilored ~ly, csl~'~ially h~ ar~as whcr~ the majodty
' l~nd dc~lopmenl will o~mr and whcr~ the majofily of thc tran~ponalion impro~n~na
YtnttM~ $0 Coll~'r Cotm t3'
and Assoc~ate~ Inc. Tran.cpo~'tatlon Impact Fee Update Stu~.
Legend
.... OrJ~lnml Impmc!
- ~tsttflg
~osed ~ftt
District ~Y
~o~scd ~FJt
1 Dts~rJct
Proposed Impact Fee Ftgur~
BeneFi~ Distclcts
~ALE
O~ER ~ * ......
BIBLIOGRAPHY
~.. · IIIlILIOGRAI'II¥
Alternative Impact Ice Study ~or the ~stom Hous~ Impact F~ Ap~el ~!~ Orlando,
~ ~, ~orida, P~lonnl En~n~rin~ ~nsultant~ In~, N~r
~tcm~ti~ Impact ~cc Study Ji~ Lu~ ~ ~nter, OranRc ~unty, ~o~dn, Tra~c Plannin~
and ~icn, ln~ June 1~
: ' O~ of ~clnnd Impact ~ Study, ~keland, Horlda, ~ml~Hom and ~lat~ In~ Ju~,
1987.
O~ of Tampa ~p ~n~e~stio Su~ ~ml~-Hom and ~iat~ In=. unpubl~b~, 1~.
~mfo~ Inn: Trans~r~ation Impact F~ ~tcrnat~ ~aly~i~ Venue Hancen B~tli~ ln~
Orland~ ~o~a, ~ptcm~r 1~
Impact F~ ~c ~-~7, ~tone ~tcmnti~ Study, Orange ~unty, ~orida, Orelncr, ln~ July
Int~natlonal T~c ~ntcr Tra~c Impact Fc~ Orland~ ~orida, ~a~rtntion ~nsulting Omup,
JulZ 1~7.
~ini-~'a~ho~c Tra~rtatlon Impact F~ Study, ~ oF Pincll~ Park, Pincllns ~un~,
Tampa Bey ~in~ng, N~m~r 1~.
" Pincll~ ~)onty Trnns~rtatlon Impact Fcc Study, Pincllas ~unty, ~orldn, ~ndalc-Oii~r and
~i~t~ Tampa, ~orlda and JHK end ~iat~ Orlando, ~orldn, Pinell~'~un~,
~o~da, N~m~r, I~.
'~:' ~ .' Polk ~un~ Urban ~a Tra~at~n Study, Hnancinl E~ou~ ~a~is for 2010 U~at~ Polk
SC Jc~me ~tholic ~u~h: Inde~ndent Trans~rtatlon Impe~ F~ ~al~ ~rC~ ~ortdn,
, ,' Bm~ Mc~ughlin Planning, Indian E~ Beach, ]~orlda, ~ptcm~r 1987.
,~ Tra~p~alion ~cr~, Trans~rtntion R~ca~h Re,rd ~ 1155, TranSlation R~ca~h
,. :. National E~rch ~uncil, W~hlngton, D.~, 1~.
oo,
~'h'~,nspori~tion Impact Fcc S~udy for ~ Se~ S~n~io~ ~mk ~nducled in Hnell~
~t~n~tce ~umlcs. ~rid,. ~ml~Horn ~nd ~s~lat~ ~n~. May
~ip Oencratlo~. 4lb ~itlon. Instltuto of ~a~rtatlo~ Engin~ Washington. D.~ 1~9.
~p Ocnc~tton Ratm for Budgct~tyle Motcl~ Sandra M. W~ ~ Journal, Dccem~r 1~.
' ~p ~ngth Stu~' for Shopping ~ntcr ~nductcd in ~lanat~ ~unty, Manat~ ~umy, ~orlda,
~' .. ~ ~ml~Hom and ~iat~ ln~, ~m~r,
133
APPENDIX A
DEFINITIONS
API'ENDIX A
DEFINITION!;
~ ions of moat land usc categories can be found in the ln~lhule of Transportation
(Fifth Edition) which has bccn used cxlcnslvely in thts Impact fee update
However, some terms have not been clearly dcAncd, and the intent or this chapter is to
~ {uidnnce to dcvclopcn and Count)' staff lo select the appropriate land use category and fee
rate ~rtaln developments. Thc intent of Ihts chnptcr b to prm. tde guidance, bul it ~ not
i= to replace thc professional judgcmen! of County staff·
etly care industry is an cvolvlng industry in Florida. The range of services provided at some
makes them di~cult to cl~.~i~ and, as the industry contlnu=` to ~,olve, d~velopmems may
lncl~"~ mixtur=` of thc Ihree land use classifications pr~'idcd in the standard impact fee rate
ach~i'~le, Ncw types or elderly care faciHti=` may also be offered. The di~usaions below are
Jntc{~tcd to auist dcvelopen and County staff to sclcct the appropriate impact fee rates.
: Thc nursing home land use in this stud), rcfcn to Ihe land uses described in the
]nstf~tc'of Ttansportatlon Eaginccrs Land Use Code 620, and are a~ociatcd ~qth thc 'care for
pe~.~n~ unable to care for thcmsclvta'. Th=`e fac~itlns contain multiple suites for
residents
or
fn ~ne or. more dormitory, style buildings. Trip gcneratlor~ charactc~tlca of thee facilities tend to
be ~:~her than those of Adult Congregate Living Facilhles (scc below), presumably because of a nccd
for ]dditlonal employees and acrv~cea to provide the necessary care. Incidentally, no restrictions to
cid reaident~ are noted by the ITE reference for nursing homes.
A ncregate LMn~ Fac~dv (ACLI~: This land use comaponda to ITE Land Use Code 252.
Alt _~_ ?gh the lypo of bu~dlng may be almilar to a nurslr.~g home, the primary characteristlc that
dist.~blah=` ACLF's from hurting homes ts the ab~ity of the residents to care for thcmsclves.
Re~nts of a~ ACLF may have vehicles available for transportation, whereas nursing home residents
.or. Tr p rat=, reported i. the ( er,tion rereren ind cate lo,,:r
rat'~l~r unil than for nunlng homes, pr=,umably a result of the r=,idcnts' ab~ity to care for
A-I
A retirement oommunlty ~rresl~'~nds to ~E Land Use Code 2~0. The~e
d,,~'e~s are ty~lcall)' frec.standlng, dbplcx, or townhouses, Irnd oricntcd tc~.ard retirees who are scl[.
suffi~t. AJthoui~h the residents or retirement communit~'.s are usually active, trip generation rates
per '~x:iling are Io~cr than non-retirement dwellinl~s. This presumahl), occur~ because social
activ~le~ and programs are sometimes offered whhin the developm=n! and tho dwellings on the
nvcr~l~ have fewer people living in them than non.retirement homes.
Dil~r~nces between a gasoline station whh minor sundry sales and convenience store~ witl~ ~asollne
pum.~must be clarified. In recent year~ gasoline reta~ers have been expanding service stations into
"he,convenience stores", and convenience retailers are providing gasoline pumps as n part of their
storeq~; Ahhough exceptions can occur, the following luid¢lines arc based on trip generation rate
sut~. conducted by or under the direction of Tindale-Oliver staff, and provide distinguishing
cha~er~sttcs:
~: Service stations ar~ traditional service stalions, offcrin~ the sale of gasoline, minor
m '~ec~nlcal repair'., routine vehicle maintenance, and on-site car washes {t)~ically one w~h bay),
~: Gasoline stations nrc d[st[n;uishcd from Service Stations in that they do not offer
veh~¢ repalr~ or tout[ne maintenance service. A one-bay car wash may be pr~ent, but the enclosed
bu~ area~ or 'k~osks", typically do not exceed 1,000 square f~t. Minor sundrie~ may be sold at
the~o~k, such as he, rages and snack~, but the s[t~ are developed primar~¥ for the sale of ~.asoline,
withe sale o[' sundry items play~n~ a seconda~ tole. 'f~/plcally no parkinl~ spaces are delineated
a~_?.eveloped with the sale o£ convenlence ~oods as the prima~ focus. Gasoline pumps may or may
no_~_' present, and gasoline sales may comprise a significant part of the economic act~ty. Bu~din~s
category typically exceed 1,000 square feet, and arc fr~ucntly on the ordcr of 2,500 square
One fcalurc which indicates a ;rcalcr emphasis on Ibc sale of convenience ;oods
~soltne is thc dellncation of p,~r~in~ spaces for customer~ ~shln~ to p~rcha~
thc dcfinit~n of a ~sollne pump b n~. In t~h study, a ~olinc pum~ b a
d~ cnpnblo of ~cin~ ~ ~hlcl~ at n time, whether Ilmit~ ~ tho numar of
d~l[~ hos~ or by the I~ation of other pum~ Ind~r site feitu~ to p~nt additional
from ~n~ se~iced. ~gu~e A-I fljustrnt~ s~rnl ~s~ollne pump ~land ~nflgurntlons and
t~c appropriate numar o~ pum~
: Aura ~pair facBili~ include s~clali~d auto repair land m~ auch ~ muffler
~m~ion ~palr, auto a~r ~nditlonin~ ~pair, ~ ~11 as zeneral auto repatr sho~ prodding
137
A-3
Example 1: One Pump
(One mechanical device, two hotel,
accessible to two vehicles slmull.~neoust~.)
Example 2: Two Pumps
('Two mechanical devices, four hoses,
accessible to four vehicles slmultaneously)
Examplo 8: Two Pump~
(Two mechanical devices, twelve hoses,
accessible to four vehicles slmullaneously)
Example 4': Two Pumps
(Three mechanical devices, slx hoses,
accessible lo four vehicles simultaneously)
FIGURE A-I
EXAMPLE GASOLINE PUMP CONFIGURATIONS
TINDA [ E
OLIV[R "~
A-4
APPENDIX B
ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY STUDIES
OT~01 .gl
I~IJRNETT BANI< - ~2B5 TAMIAMI ~IL
1) N~ ~ tr~s
~ ~ x n~
~.:~ ;' ~A~-S~ ~-END T~AL OR~INUSE ~PE DIVE~
; ~ r~ ~75 '0,TS ~50 R C
~ ~ ~50 0 C
~ E,~ 5,75 11,50 W C
;~ .: :~: 0.~ ~ ~ H C
-.. ':." 0.~ 0.~ 0.50 W C
~ 2.75 ~ W C
~ '.. 1.~ 1.50 2.50 O C
~75 0.~ 1 .~ H C
[50 ~ ~75 O C
1.~ ~ 1.50 H
~ 0.~ 0.50 O C
~ 0.25 ~50 W C
5.~ ~ ~.~ H C
1.~ 2.~ ~ O C
' 1.75 0.~ ~ H C
' · ' 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ H C
~ .~, 0.~ ~.50 ~.75 R C
0.~ I.~ 1,50 W C
" ~ 0.~ 0.50 O C
~75 ~ 1~50 H C
· ~ ~75 I.~ W C
· ~ 0.~ 4.~ H C
J :. 1.~ ~ ~75 W C
, ~75 ~ 1.~ W C
..~ ' 1.~ ~ 1.~ H C
0.50 I0.~ 11.~ H - C
· 50 0.~ ~75 W C
0.~ 0.~ ~ W C
~ I.~ 7.~ H D
~75 1.~ ~ W D 1
0.~ ~.75 ~ H D 0.~
3.50 5.75 ~.25 W D 7.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.50 W D 0.75
1.~ 5,75 7.~ W O 1
1.~ 1.75 ~ H D
4~ 2.75 0.~ ~ W O 0, S0
1,~ ~ I,~ H D 0,50
1,~ ~ 7,~ W D 0.75
S,75 0.~ 8,50 H D 1,50
' 1.7S 3,~ S.~ W D 1
Z.00 4.7S S~7S vt, .O 1.~5
1.00 0.75 1.TS W n 0.7S
1.TS 0.S0 2.25 H D 1.00
~.25 1.25 4.S0 H D
0.?$ ~.00 ~.75 H D 1.00
~.1~ 1,7~ $,$0 H D
1.~ ~.$0 ~,?$ H D I.~S
0,~ 0,25 0,$0 W p
1.~ 1.25 ~.S0 W ' p
0.~ 0.~ 0.$0 W P
~,00 ~,00 1~.00 0 P
~.~S ~-~ ~,$0 W p
I.~S 1.~ ~$0 H P
0.25 0.~S 0.$0 W p
1.00 . I.C~) ~ H P
1.25 1.2S 2.S0 ' H p
&25 8.2S 12.S0 W p
2.50 ~..S0 S.00 H p
0.50 0.S0 1.00 W p
0.7S 0.75 1 .SO W P
~.25 ~ 4.S0 W p
1.7S 1.7S &S0 H P
2.75 ~..75 S. S0 W P
0.25 0.~S 0.S0 W p
0.7S O. TS 1.S0 W p
2.2S 2..7S S. O0 W 8
&?S 3.?S ?.SO 0 8
;'.SO ~.25 8.75 W 8
9.SO &TS 11.~S H 8
BAr"-INE~ BANI< - 7'95 F~F'TH AVENUE SOUTH
1) Numb~ o! tr~-e~s 116
~ A~ble T~ L~fth 1.66
4} ~ x ~ ~74
~.~ 0.50 ~,75 H C
. 0.25 1,25 1,50 R C
7,~ 0.50 7,50 H C
. 0.75 ~ 4,~ W C
~ ~ ~ W C
7,~ ~ 7,~ H C
~50 ~ ~75 H C
· ~ 7,~ &~ W C
· ~ 0.~ 0.50 W C
~75 0.25 1,~ R C
&50 3.50 10.~ W C
0,50 1,~ 1,50 H C
0,25 0,25 0.50 W C
0.~ ~25 ~50 H C
~ 0,~ 0.50 R C
~ 1,75 2,~ W C
4,~ 0.~ 4,60 H C
~ ~ 0,50 W C
2,75 0,25 ~ W C
7,75 0.25 &~ H C
~ :~ ~ 1.~ ~ 1.~ H C
'" 1,~ ~ I,~ H C
'L': 11,50 0,~ I 1,75 H C
2,~ 0,~ 2. S0 H C
~S0 0.50 4,~ H C
0,~ ~ ~S0 H ' C
~ ~ ~ W C
0,~ 0,50 ~ R C '
~ 0,~ ~ H C
1,~ 1,50 2.60 W C
0.~ 0.~ 0.50 W C
~75 0,75 4,50 H D 0.~
1,75 0,~ ~ H D 0.50
&~ ~ &~ H D 0'S0
7,~ 0,~ 7,~ H D 0-S0
19,~ ~ 19,50 H D 0-S0
~ ~ 4,~ W D OS0
0.50 ~50 4.~ W D ~50
I,~ 0,~ 2.~ H D GS0
1.50 0.S0 ~ W D 1.~
~., 7.~ 7.~ 14.~ H P
0.~ 0.~ 0, S0 fl P
0,~ 0.25 ~60 W P
0,~ 0.~ ~50 W P
1.75 1.75 ~50 H P
. ~75 ~75 1.50 H P
1.50 1.50 3,~ H p
O,~'S 0,25 ' O.SO W P
0.~ 0 ~ G$O W P
B, S0 8, S:0 17.00 ' H
0,~S 0.~ Q, S0 W P
~ 0,~S 0,2S 0,S0 W P
tl.~S 7.OO 3E'8.25 H 8
~. 1.00 0,S0 1.S0 R 8
~ 8.S0 2.00 10,S0 H 8
1.7~ 1.25 3.00 H $
· ~,~ BANK ,: ~1 O100LDEN GAT~ PARKWAY
7.~ 0.50 7.75 0 C
· ~ 5.25 [~ H C
· 50 ~S0 7.~ O C
7.75 1.50 g,~ H C
· 50 7.75 ~ W C
4,50 7.~ 11.SO H C
· 50 ~TS 4.~ 0 C
0.50 7.50 ~,~ W C
7.S0 ~SO ~ W C
14.S0 ~S0 1S.~ W C"
0.S0 ~ ~75 fl C
0.~ 0.7S 1.~ W C
~7S ~S0 1.~ W C
0.S0 0,~ ~75 H C
1.S0 S.~ ~S0 H C
0.S0 S.~ S.75 H C
~S0 S.~ S.~ H C
0.~ IS0 g.~ H C
~50 4.~ 4J0' H C
~7S 7.~ 8.~ W D
4.S0 ~ 4.7S H D
2.25 S.~ 7.50 H D 1.50
B-$
1.00 S. 75 7.7=. rq ~ ....,v
0,.?S &2S &00 H D I.S0
1.50 18.?S 18.2S W D ~00
0. S0 O~2S 0.?S H D O. S0
1.$0 1.S0 3,00 W P
0,S0 0,$0 1.00 H P
0,7S 0,?S I,S0 H P
0,75 0,75 1.S0 H P
0.25 0.25 0.S0 W P
0.$0 O. SO 1.00 I P
~,$0 ~,SO ?.00 H P
0,$0 0.50 1.00 R P
o, so o,5o 1.oo w P
2.50 2.S0 S,00 H P
4,S0 4.50 ~.00 H P
6.2S S,2S 11.00 W P
~,SO 3.50 7.00 H P
0,75 0.75 I.S0 H P
0,S0 0.S0 1.00 W P
0,2S 0.25 0.S0 W P
&TS 4.2S 8.0O W 8
~ . GREEN TREE SHOPPING CENTER - AIRPORT & IMMOKAIIEE ROADS
~ ~ ~nt N~ Tr~ ~.1
:~' ~ ~-END TOTAL ~INUS ~PE
~ :~ -.:~ ~ 0.~ 7.50 7.75 O C
' ~ ZSO 5.50 H C
:: I0,~ 10.~ ~,~ H P
~;~' ~50 ~50 1.~ H P
~'~:.~ ~50 ~S0 I.~ H P
~ ~ 2.5~ ~S0 5.~ H P
5.~ 5.~ I0.~ H P
Z~ 2.~ 4.~ H P
~"~ ~ 0.~ 0.50 H P
0.~ ~7S 1.50 H P
~7S ~7S S, BO H
~ 1.~ 1.~ 2.~ H P
'~ 1.~ 1.~ ~ H P
2.~ 2.~ 4.~ H P
: 2.75 2.75 5.50 H P
2,~ 2.~ 4.~ H P
'~' 4.~ 4,~ &~ H
~,: ~ ~ 4.~ H P
,,~-: t ~S0 ~S0 1.~ H P
':~.'t 7.50 750 1[~ H P
'~, g,SO [SO I~ H P
/~ &~ &~ I~50 H P
~. [~ [7S 7~0 H P
'~' [~ [7S 7.S0 H P
,/~, S.SO S.SO 11 .~ H P
0.~ 0.25 ~50 H P
,~ 2.~ ~ 4,50 H P
,' 1~0 ~ ~SO W 8
:~ 4.~ ~.~ 1 ~ W S
" ¢ fl52 146
RAINBOW FOOO MART - ~4~ FL&*rI1.E~N&I~ HAMMOCK
~ 1)~ ~s 14~
J;': ~ ~ ~-~O ~TAL ORIGIN ~PE
~ ~ ~ &~ R C
~ .> ~.~ 1.~ &~ W C
,¢, ~ ~ 1.~ R C
~ ~ ~75 R C
:~ 4,~ 1.~ 6,~ R C
~ 4.~ ~ 4,50 W C
,; :~, ~ ~ 1.~ H C
,~,:~ ; ~75 ~S0 &~ R C
( ~.50 1.~0 7.~ R C
:' ~' 0.50 ~ 0.75 W C -
~;;;~ 1.~ ~75 1.~ H C
:~' ~ ~ ~75 W C
..~' 1.~ ~.~ &~ H C
'3~ &~ 1.~ 7.~ O C
4.~ &~ 7.~ W C
4.75 0.~ ~.~ W C
~ ~S0 0.~ &~ W C
~" 0.50 ~ &~ W
~ '~ ~' ~75 0.50 1.~ W C
O.~ ~7S ~ W . G
~ ~ ~ 7.~ W C
E7S S.7S ~0 W C
S.~ ' ~ ~ W D 1.50
. ¥~ , 4.~ ~ 4.~ R D 1.50
. 11.~ ~S0 ~.50 W O 1.~
,, g.~ ~ g.~ W D. I.S0
: 4.~ ~ 1~ W D I.~
S.75 1.~ ?.~ H D 2.50
:;*' 2. S0 I.~ &TS H D 1.~
4.~ 0.75 S.~ W D 1.50
12.~ ~75 12.7S H D 1.50
0,S0 3.~ 3. S0 W D
0. S0 2.25 ~.7S H D 1
0.53 3,~ ~S0 W D 1
:147
0,50 0,50 1.00 W P
0.2S C),~5 0,S0 W P
0.75 0,75 1,S0 H P
o,so ~o ~.~o N p
~S0 0,S0 1.GQ H P
0,~S 0.25 0.S0 H P
0,$0 Q.S0 1,~0 H P
1.S0 1.S0 3.00 H P
0.25 0,2S 0.S0 H P
1.2S 1.2S P-SO H P
0,S0 O. SO 1.00 H P
· S0 0.SO 1.00 H
0.25 0,25 0.50 H
3,00 3.00 &O0 H
0.50 0.50 1.00 H P
0,$0 0.$0 1.00 H P
S, 00 10.00 15.00 W 8
5.75 ~,S0 $.25 W 8
0.2S 3.S0 &TS H V
3.0O &25 ~.2S H V
B-9
'~ MCDONALDS - ~ NORTH COLLIER BLVO- MARCO ISLAND
8TART SITE ~[TE-END TOTAL ORIGIN TYPK DIVER.
0.25 2.25 2.50 W C
0.75 0.25 1.00 R C
0.25 0.25 0.50 H C
7.75 2.25 10.00 W C
7.75 2.25 10.00 W C
1.50 0.25 1.75 H C
0.25 2.00 2.25 R C
1.25 3.50 4.75 H C
0.25 1.25 1.50 R C
1 1.00 1,25 12.25 H C
::. 0,75 0.25 1.00 H C
.., 0`25 0.25 0.50 W P
0,75 0.75 1.50 W P
1.75 1.75 3.50 O P
0,25 0.25 0.50 W
~'~ 1.50 1.50 $6.00 H P
0.25 0.25 0.50 H P
· 1.75 1.75 3.50 O P
1.75 1.75 &S0 O P
· ,: 0.25 0.25 ~SO W P
1.T5 1.75 3.S0 0 P
: 1.00 1.00 2.00 H P
: 1.75 1.75 &50 0 P
0.75 0.75 1.50 0 P
1.25 1.25 2.50 H P
0.7S 0.75 1.S0 H P
2.00 2.00 4.00 O P
1.25 2.25 &50 H S
;i;'~ 2.50 2.25 4.75 W
D-lO
EAST T~AII. SI4L%L ~TATION - 2891 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIt.
';; ........
AIl#.lable Ti~ Length 1.1g
4) FlOWT'~ x I~m~J) 0.47
SiTE ~TE-END TOTAL OPJGfl4 TYPE
6.~ 11.75 17.~ O C
0.~ ~50 ~7S O C
17.~ 1,75 1~ H C
0.~ 17.75 ~.~ H C
0.~ 1.~ ~ W C
18.~ 1.50 19.50 W C
· ~ ~50 ~75 0 C
~ ~ 1.~ W C
· ~ 1.~ 1.~ 0 C
~ ~ ~50 , W C
l&~ I.~ 19.75 W C
1,~ 1~ 11,~ W C
· ~ 1.~ ~.~ H
· ~ 1~ 1.50 H C
~ 1.~ 6.~ H C
1~ ~ 1.~ W C
0.~ 0.~ ~50 H C
&~ l&~ 1&50 W C
1.~ 1Z~ 1~ H C
&~ 1.~ 4,~ H C
~ ~ L~ O C
1.~ 1~ 3.~ H C
~ ~ &~ H D
~ 1.~ 4.~ W D 1.~
~ ~ ~ W D
L~ ~ &~ H D 0.50
· ~ 1.~ 4.~ H D
~ ~ ~ W D
~ ~ 0.50 H P
~ ~ 1.50 W p
~ ~ ~ H p
1~0 1~ ~ H p
· ~ ~ 1~ H P
~75 ~ 1 ,~ H p
· ~ ~50 11,50 W 8
~50 I.~ 4.50 H 8
B-II
,oo, 052,, 150
B & 8 -TEX~b'"O - 1865 ~rH STREET Hol~n-I
~ ,~JSeMlblt Tdp LenGth 1
3.?S 0.$0 4.25 W C
1.25 S,25 8.50 W C
· -' 1.50 5,25 3.75
L 1,25 2.25 3.S0 H C
0,25 &~S &S0 H C
2.50 0.25 2.75 H C
0.75 $.75 6,$0 O C
? 3.75 1.25 S.00 H C
?~., 0.75 0.50 1.25 O C
· .~;~':~ S.75 0.25 &00 W C
-,: 0~S0 &2S 8.75 H C
2.50 0.25 2.75 H C
' ~25 zoo 2.25 n c
!;i,-. 0.25 zso 2.7~ o c
~.?s ~.25 3.0o o c
. 3.00 1.S0 4.S0 H C
· '~' 2.25 1.25 3.S0 H C
.:.?,:, S.75 0.25 &00 H C
3.25 0.50 3.75 W C
2.25 3.S0 S.75 W C
~ ~... 0,7S &S0 4.2S H C
?.00 0.25 7.25 *H C
~' 8.25 1.7S 11.00 W C
0.50 1.25 1.7S H C
S.25 0.25 $.S0 H C
7.00 2.25 tTS H C
~:,' 0.50 2.00 2.50 O D 1.00
B.(X) 1.S0 10.50 H D 1.00
1.25 1.25 2.50 H P
2.S0 2.S0 S.00 O P
~i~~ 0.50 0.50 1.00 O P
~'.r~~ 0.75 0,75 1.50 H P
.!u 1.00 1.S0 2. S0 H S
*** ~ 2.00 0.50 2.50 R 8
PiCK KWII< - 23?5 C~ 591
I) I~r~em New Trlpl 25.7~
· ~, ~) AlItlllble Trip Length 1
" 4) Row(2) x Rc~v(3) 0`~a
START $r1~ SITE-END TOTAl. ORIGIN TYF£ DIVER,
6.75 4.00 10.75 O C
0.25 8.50 8.75 H C
7.00 0.25 7.25 H C
: 0.25 5.00 5.25 W C
0.25 0.25 0.50 O C
4.00 7.25 11.25 H C
0.25 &75 9.00 H C
2.25 100 5.25 0 C
3`00 2.25 5,25 W C
1.00 4.00 5.00 H C
0.25 7.00 7.25 H C
0.25 &00 9,25 W C
~' &25 3.00 11.25 0 C
~'~ 0,25 1.00 1.25 O C
" 0.25 &25 &$0 W C
0.25 0.25 0.50 O C
1.00 0.2.5 1.25 R C
1.00 3.00 4.00 W C
3.00 5.00 &00 W C
2.25 3.00 5.25 W C
0.25 1.00 1.50 W C
4.00 0.25 4.25 H C
· ' 0.25 4.C0 4.2~ H C
&00 ?.00 15.00 R C
,4 7.00 &2S 1S.25 . W C
0.25 0.25 0.S0 H C
'. 4.00 2.25 &25 H C
· 3`00 2.00 $.00 R C
0.25 1.IX) 1.25 H C
5.25 4.00 9.25 W C
&75 3.00 1 1.75 W C
-' 1.00 2.00 3.00 H C
','!; 0.25 15.50 15.75 H C
:'~/ &75 3.50 12.25 W C
~ 0.25 15.00 15,75 H C
~:' 0.25 7.50 ?.75 H C
0.25 1S.SO 15.75 H C
1.75 1.00 2.7S W C
0.25 &75 7.00 H C
." 0.25 2.25 2.50 O C
~: 4.00 2.00 &00 H C
, 0`2S 4.00 4.25 H C
' *'* 0.25 0,25 0. S0 H C
0.25 1.03 1.2S H
=' 52,, t 153'
4.OO ~.?$ 7.?S
0,25 2.OO ~.~.5
'~ 0.25 4.O0 4.25
%':, ' 6.7S 0.~S ?.00
,. '~:~' o.u ~.eo ~.25 o c
0.25 1.co 1.25 w c
0.25 0.1'5 0.50 O C
0,~5 6.75 0.00 H C
1.00 7.25 6.25 W D 2.00
1.00 6.25 7.25 H D 2.00
0.25 0,25 0.50 W P
:~'.. 0.25 0.25 0.50 H P
· ' 0.25 0,25 0.50 H P
0.~ O.25 0.~0 H P
0.~ 0.~ 0.$0 H P
?i 1.00 1.00 2.00 W
0.25 0.~S 0.S0 H P
0.25 0.25 0.50 H P
O.25 0.~ 0.S0 W P
0.25 0.~ 0.S0 O P
0.~ 0.~ 0.50 H P
a. TS 2.25 6.00 H 8 .
' S.25 ~.25 7,S0 ' W
10.00 ?.rS 10,7S H 8
; ~, K)NQ$ lAKE SQUARE - 4~00 DAVIS BLVD.
~ ~ ..... ) Numb
,~; ~P~entN~
~.- ~l~l~Tr~ Len~h ~.~ ,,
4) ~ x R~
,~,.. ~A~'~ S~-END TOTAL ORIGIN ~E ~E~
'" Z7S 4.~ 7.~ R C
· ~ 1.~ 4.~ R C
4.~ 1~ ~ W C
· ~ 9.~ 17~ O C
~ 5.75 9.~ W C
'* ~,'~: 4.~ o~ s.~ o c
,,, ~75 14.~ 1~ W C
' 1.~ 0.~ 1.50 R C
I.~ 4.~ ~.50 O C
0.~ 0~ 0,50 W C
1.~ &~ 4.~ R C
." , ~ 17.~ ~75 17.75 W C
~" ~ 1.~ 4.7~ O C
4.~ 1.~ ~.50 W C
~,~ ~ 4.50 ~ R C
:. ~ ~ ~50 ' O C
I.S0 ~75 S.~ W C
, I.~ 1.~ ~ O C
Z~ 0.~ Z~ 0 C
-~., 1.~
4.75 1.~
' ,' ~ 4.~ · ~ O C
7~ ~ 7.~ W C
' 4.~ 1.~
' 7~ ~7~ 10.~ W O
' 1~ 1.~
L~ ' ~ ~ ~ H P
~ ~ ~ 0.S0 H P
~ ~ 1.50 H P
S.S0 9.S0 19.~ H P
4.S0 4.~ 9.~ H p
~, 0.~ 0.75 1.50 H P
· " 0.~ 0.25 0.S0 H P
'i/ 1.75 1.75 ~S0 H p
'* 1.50 1.S0
B-1K
~.OO 1.00 2.00 H P
1.50 1.50 3.00 H P
1.~ I.~ Z.~ H P
0,75 ~7S 1.~0 H P ~
~7~ ~?S 1.50 H P
1,75 1.75 ~S0 H P
I.~ 1.~ ~.~ H P
~75 0.TS I.S0 H P
8.~ 8.~ 18.~ H P
2.25 2.25 4.S0 H P
0.~ 0.25 0,S0 H P
1.~ 1.~ ' ~S0 W P
0.~ ~75 1.S0 H P
~S0 ~S0 7.~ H P
~ ~ &~ H P
2.~ 2.25 4.50 W P
~75 ~75 S.S0 H P
0.~ 0.~ 0.S0 H P
1.~ 1.~ ~ H P
1.50 1.60 ~ H P
1.~ 1.~ 2.50 W P
2.~ 2.~ 4,~ W P
~.~ ~.~ 4.50 H P
~ ~ ~0 H P
~ ~ ~ W P
~75 ~75 S.S0 W P
2.75 ~.75 ~ S.S0' H P
1.~ 1.7S ~S0 H P
4.~ 4.~ ~50 H P
0.~ 0.~ 0.S0 H P
~ ~ ~ H P
~.~ g.~ 18.~ · H P
1.~ 1.~ ~ H P
~ ~ ~ H P
~ ~ 4.50 H P
~ ~ 4.S0 H P
1.~ 1.~ ~ H P
4.~ 4.~ 8.50 H P
~ ~ S.S0 H P
1.~ 1.~ ~ H P
~75 ~75 1~0 H P
~ 1.~ ~.S0 H S
g.~ ~ 1S.S0 H 8
S. S0 2.S0 ~ W 8
· 75 3.S0 7.~ H 8
Z. TS 4.~ 7.~ R S
Numb~ of tr~-e~a 146
~.~ 4.50 ~5.~ H C
~ ~7' 6.' H C
S.~ 0,75 5.75 H C
&S0 ~50 g.~ H C
0.~ 2.50 [~ H C
· 50 [50 ~.~ H C
· ~ 0.S0 7.~ H C
· 75 [?S 7.50 H C
· ~ ~75 I0.~ H C
4.50 1.75 ~ H C
4.50 1.~ S. S0 H C
14,75 2.75 17.50 H C
· ~ ~ 6.~ H C
4.~ 0.~ 4.~ H C
10.~ [~ 1[~ H C
4.50 0.50 ~.~ N C
~75 ~ 7.75 H C
· ~ O.~ L~ H C
~.~ ~75 4.~ H
10.50 , 0.50 11.~ H C
21~ ~ ~ H C
I .~ 1 ~ ~ H C
~ 1.50 1.75 H O
~ ~50 ~ H C
4.50 1.75 S.~ H C
3,~ 1.50 4.75 H C
~-1~
-. 52,,, 157
!~" 8,S0 1.S0 10.g0 H C
0,?S ~.2S 3.00 H
:!~; $.75 1,00 8,?S H C
~\ ,.y-! 11.?S 1.50 13.25 H
~. i 4.~ 0.S0 4.75 H
4.00 2.75 6.?$
1.75 2.00 3`?S H C
,: 6.?$ 3,2S S.00 H C
~:.~= 9.~S 1.S0 I0.7S H C) 3`00
· ' 0,?S 0.S0 1.25 H D 1
$.2S 1.S0 6,7S H D 3,00
7.2S 1.50 B,?S H D 1,00
0.?S 2.00 :'.IS H D 1.00
~';' S.75 1.00 6.75 H D 1.50
. ! . 4.S0 4.S0 9.00 H P
· · ~ 4.2S 1.S0 S.75 H $
~ i*, 7.75 2.0O ~.7S H S ...
~::,, 8.75 1.S0 8.2S "
8.?'S 2.75 O.S0 H S
~ *' 8,.S0 2.00 8.S0 H S
4.2~ 1.S0 5.75 H S
, ~..00 3`00 B.00 H S
""'~ 7.00 ,3`00 10.00 H 8
~, ': 4.75 1.50 6.2S H
',,-~...r &~ 1.S0 &2S H 8
~'. Tr. 1,f)
: ~, I) Nu~ M Ir~8 118
' ~ ~blt Tr~
~ 4} R~ x R~ 0,40
~ART ~ ~-END TOTAL ORIGIN ~PE DIVE~
0.~ 4.'/5 5.~ H C
5,~ 1,~ ~50 0 G
0.50 1.~ 1~0 H C
· ~ I.~ 4,75 H C
· ~ 2.~ ~ ' W C
', ~ 4.~ 1~ H C
4.50 4.~ g.~ H C
4.50 ~ ~ H C
I.~ 4.~ 5.~ W C
~. ~75 1.~ 4,7S W C
:' 1.~ ~75 ~75 W C
1.~ 5.~0 ~50 H C
· ~ 0.~ 4.~ H C
0,75 0,25 1.~ H C
~ 4.75 5.~ 9.75 H C
'. 4,75 4.~
4,50 ~75 ~ H C
~- ~50 2.75 ~ W -C
'~. ~, 1~ ~ 10.~ H C
· ~ ~75 I.~ H C
~ - 1,~ ~,~ ~50 H C
~.~., ~ 4.50 4~
1~7~ 1,~ 1~75 H C
· . 1,75 4.~ ~50 H C
Z~ 4.75 7,~ H C
5,~ 4.~ 9,~ H C
~; &~ ~,~ 7,~ H C
· ~ 4.~ ~ H C
430 1.~ ~ H C
&~ &~ ~ H C
I.~ ~ ~ H C
4.~ S.S0 9.7S H C
· 0.~ 9.~ 1~ R C
· ~ ~ ~50 H C
~ 4.~ ~ H C
1.50
5.~ 1.~
1 .~ 1
5.50 1.50
~75
0.50
0~ 0.25 0,S0 H P
0,TS 0,?S 1.S0 H P
3,2S 3,2S &S0 W P
1.~S 4.S0 S,?S H 8
4.?$ 1.75 S. S0 W 8
%00 4.60 S. S0 O $ ·
~,0O 4.1'5 7.'7~ H 8
1.2S 4.60 S.?S H 8
1.6.0 4,25 5,?$ H 8
1.7~ 4,75 6,6O H 8
1.60 $,25 6,75 H 8
2.25 4,TS 7.00 H 8
HE~$ ~TATION - 697 ~TH ~'REET NORTH
:.. ~ I)MClnl NIwTrlpl ~)3.a"4
4) FIO~2} x Rov,~[3) 0.24 1.15
~I'ART SiTE SITE-END TOTAL ORI~IN TYPE DIVER,
:, 1.{30 7..~0 5.50 W C
4.75 1.60 5.25 H C
0.25 1.00 1.25 W C
3.50 0.25 3.75 W C
1.00 $.50 6.50 W C
,; 3.50 1.00 4.50 H C
~ 7.75 0.25 5.00 H C
..~.: ~ 3.50 0.25 3.75 ~V C
i,~. ": 0.25 10.75 11.00 H C
:~' ' '" 2.00 1.00 3.00 H
~.!..
4.00 1.50 5.50 H C
7.00 3.$0 10.50 H C
.,. 5.00 0.50 5.so H
it 0.50 1.75 2.25 H C
~). ~ 7.50 0.25 7.75 W C
? 2.75 0.75 3.50 H C
0.75 2.75 5.50 W C
0.25 5.50 5.75 W C
~-7'.. 0.25 3.50 3.75 H C
0.25 1.50 1.75 W
0.25 0.50 0.75 H C
1.00 0.25 1.25 W C
~:' 1.50 1.00 2.50 W
'~: 4.S0 0.50 5.00 H C
0.25 2.75 3.0O W O
1.00 3.50 4.50 W O
1.00 &75 7.75 W c
0.75 1.25 2.00 w C
0.2.5 0.25 0.50 H C
0.25 0.25 0.S0 W C
1.75 1.75 3.50 H C
0.25 0.2~ 0.S0 H C
4.25 1.00 S.2S H C
2.25 0.75 3.00 H C
2.25 0.75 3.00 H C
0.0O 0.75 ~.75 H C
4.00 0.25 4.25 H C
300 0.25 0.25 H C
~:: 0.25 1.00 1.25 H C
4.00 1.00 5.00 H O
::.: :. 2.00 1.00 3.00 H C
7.00 1.00 0.00 H C
:~' 2.75 0.50 3.~ H C
4.75 1.00 5.75 H C
2.50 2.25 4.75 H C
8. S0 1.00 7.S0 H C
· ?S 3,~5 12.00 H C
1,S0 1.00 2. S0 H C
0`$0 1.00 1.50 H C
0`2s 0.?S ~.00 H C
0`50 1.00 1.S(~ H C
1.25 2.$0 3`75 H C
0`~ 2.2S 2.50 H C
3,75 0,S0 4.~ H C
1,75 0,~5 2.00 H C
0,75 0.25 1.00 H C
0,25 2.25 2.50 H C
1.00 1.00 2.00 H C
1.00 2.50 3,50 H C
10,00 0`$0 10.50 H C
7.75 0`25 ..00 H C
2.~ 2.00 4.25 H C
1.00 1.00 2.OO H C
9.00 1.75 10.75 W D 2.00
1.00 1.00 2.00 H P
1.75 1.75 3,50 H P
0.25 0.25 0.50 W P
0.50 0,50 1.00 H P
0.2~ 0,25 0.50 W P
1.50 1,50 3.OO H P
0.75 0.75 1.50 H P
0.75 0,?5 1.50 W P
0.S0 0.50 1.00 H P
1J0 130 &00 H P
0.~ 0,25 0,5O H P
3,75 1.00 4.75 H
2.00 S.S0 ?.S0 H 8
0.75 1.00 1.75 H 8
2.75 7.~0 I0.2S W
1.00 3`00 4.0O W 8
1.00 1.25 2.25 W 8
0.50 1.00 4.50 0 8
0.50 4.75 &2S W 8
COMPUTATION OF UNIT CONSTP. UCTION COST
USINO ALTER/qATIVE GROWTH RATES
AND PLANNINO HORIZONS
I
I
V~~U~I~~ 'j 0 ~ ~ 0 19,~ 4~ ~1~ ~ ~ ~
I
Link lmprovca~.,s
i
4.~ 19~ 41~ ~ ~ ~,712 ~ ~ ~12
0
0 15~ ~,~
~Hmcl[RCounfy<nFIcLIoPoeyAw. 2U 4D 0.70 11,~00 ~(,300 8.OO0 8~)25 $1,22~ $173 $0 $1,923
SamaBm'MraB~.S~a41o~Hmc~P~L 0 2u 2.2o 0 11,~30 ~5.52~ $a30 $1,37~ ~234
Tam~mlTrMF. a~ GoodlM~fld.~DIMsBh~J. 60 ~(3 0.80 ~O,100 lO.g~0 12..4~ IO ~O ~0 M.O00 M.O00 I
TamlamlTralEa~ Dav~Bk,~.tOAlrJx~tFl~ ,ID 60 1~0 37,300 T~,IO0 53.D40 $6.700 8,3,500 $4'70 S5,000 $15,670
I
TamlamiTrailE~M AkpMlFId. lo~Hmc~Rd. 40 6D 1.70 37,300 5~I00 32..300 SO S2,f~9 SaO0 SO S3,41g
TamlamiTrMEazt P,.~t~k~Hmck. Fl~toBazfootWm~.4D 60 3.00 41.000 5g.g00 5~.700 $0 $4,191 $1,132 ~0 ~S.323
TMMimlTitlN(xth I.JiCo. inl to 'Wl~o~ Pill Rd. 40 60 1.60 ~ 58,400 31,360 84) ~ ~
TlmlalndTrmllNodh VVl0oinlPia4Fid..loWFId. 40 60 1.50 37,300 5~,300 28.~ ~ S2.,000 S.540
Taml~TITINonh Wfld. toVM~Bch. Fid. 4D 60 1...,~ 41,,000 61,~00 30,900 S750 81,534 $I,62
Tafl~TrllNMth VaJ~Och. Rd. toLmugwlC)iklDr. 40 60 2.20 41,,000 61,60~ 45,320 1250 82,250 ~
~ TMMMMTtMINoilh CreechFid. to(~)ldenOateP-'~4~ 60 60 0.60 47,600 78,100 18.300 l:0 S0 SO
'~ T,Im~TfMINoeth (~)k:~enOitePadcya. yto4thkv~.N. 60 60 1..50 ~ ?'8.10Q 32.700 80 $0 S0
VaAdef'oltBeachR U,141t~.AJrp0dFid. 0 2U 2.20 0 17,400 38.280 12,100 f,3,800 S460
.
(~ 0 TMaI: 1.6,780 TOlM:
I
~ ~W~9~ ~ ~ 1.~ 18.~ ~ ~ M14 $1.~ $117
I
~~ ~-~-~M~. ~ 4D 4.~ lg.~ 41~ ~.~ ~ ~.712 ~
I~R~~~R~ ~ ~ I1~ ~ I~ ~ ~ 1124 ~ 11~4
I
~~~':'~** ' ~ ... mow c.,.~,,.c~,.~,ff- T,,,d
~ '-~:',:i~~ :~ . ' - OflSTR~T Imoe,~ro P. nd m..a (~) Vd,.N Voh,m ~ CSt.mo) (St,ooo)
~E-W~ ~~41 0 ~ ~ o 1B~ ~.~ 8161 S1~
~~RU~Io~~ ~ ~ 0.~ ~ ~ I0.1~ ~ $1,~ Sl~ ~ ~1~
~~R~~~R~ ~ 0.~ 11~ ~ 6~ ~ ~ $124 ~ ~I~4
~~~tO~~ 0 ~ ~ 0 11~ ~ ~ S1~
'
APPEI%IDIX D
ALTER..N'ATIV~ STUDY GUIDI1LINES
COLLIER, COUNTY TR. AHSPOR. TATION IMPACT FEE
Collkr County Transportation Impact Fee
TAItI_~ OI~ COUNTS
! ln~nt ~f thls d~ent 1
2 Purix~e ol'the tlt~rnate stt~dy I
~ '. Pr~applicatlon conl'e.r~ce 1
:
4 ! C~ntents and format of th~ sl~dy r~pon 3
u CcIl~cting trip lenk, th and ~i capt~n~ darn 4
Nt~mber of interviews to conduct . 6
I0 Connty review of the study r~pon 6
EXHIBIT - Blank Forms
Altcmnte Study Outdcltn,~
Collier County Transportation Impact Fcc
I ~',~ent o£thh doctuncnt
~'hc intent of this documcnt is to pro~de sppl{~ ~ ~dc~ for p~g ~e option of
a'a ~de~dcnt ~l~agon of~e ~o~ation ~ct ~ for a ~ ~ ~ option
prodded for h ~c ~ Co~ty ~ F~ ~dh~ ~h d~t ~nts~ ~e
::~~, pr~ ~d mc~odolo~ for p~pamfion, ~fo~ and ~;~;on of
a;a al~a~ ~c ~ct f~ study.
l'.:~osc of thc alternate traffic tmpact fce study
The put.sc o£thc alternativc traffic Impoct fcc study h to:
o ldcntKy the i~tcutial Impact of new dcvclopmcnt on thc Collier County t~msportatlon
systcm
o provide infonnatton wl~h will form thc bash of an Individual Ice ~ent' to be
made by Ge County.
The pre~ppUcatlon co~cre~co
^ applicant contemplating Sub~nltgng a alternate traffic study should arrange a mcctin~ with
',he County's Transportation Scrvlccs stall' before proc~edins with the study.
At this meeting thc County stalT will cover thc basic r~qu~rcmcnts efsuch a study and review
thc applicsnt's proposed approach to the study.
'~c pre-application co~crencc will normally covcr the £ollowing topics:
a) SCOpo of the study
The County staffwlll sl~"cff~ the clements Io ~ includcd in the study.
b) Proposed previous studies
I£ the applicant proposes rclyInS on the results o£any previous studie%, such as studies
c:~l~Lnnlly submhted as part o1' the zoning approval process, he should provide a copy
c ~' thc other report(s), '*
q'h¢ County will x'eview previous studies lot sxttTlckncy and applleabaity 1o the
1~roposed new developmenL
! f* an applicant proposes reducing his ~pact lee through use ora prior credit, th.ls Lsaue
s,~,Xl be review~ at the pre-application cc~rd'erenee.
¢) ?~'oposc-d study sites and study duration
The appLicant v,,Rl iden~y the siteCs) to be studied, a m~n~um of three sites. The site
· d~"r~ption should include the specLqc location, the character o£ the location (CBD,
~t~an, suburban, or rural), and the land u~(s) at the location (ITE code and
classLrlcatlon).
The appLicant should include an explanation ofwhy the proposed sites are similar to the
rroposcd new development. The explanation shoxdd address pertinent characteristics,
such as land usc, adjacent area, and dcznogrraphics.
The apptlcant should Include a map showing the location of the proposed new
d~vdopm~xt and tho proposed study sites.
The County stalTwill review the proposed study sites for applicability to the proposed
new development.
d) Proposed data elements
The C~ounty sXa~Tw:dl review the proposed data Items to be collecled in the study. These
would normally be data items to permit dete~nination of all of the Following eJen:ents
or the impact tee formula:
aO Trip gene. ration tare
The trip generation rate is normally determined by machine counts. The
applicant should provide documentation depk:ting the proposed machIne
counter sites and locations within the site. The County stalT w~l review the
proposed sites for counters, their hose configurations, and the dates o£
counting. The County staffwill specLl'y the level ol'detail to be ~ncluded In the
study report.
bb} Trip len~h, and % new trips
These two data Items are normally determined by au origin/destination survey,
consisting ol'motorist Interviews. The County staff will review the proposed
2
location of Interviewers, interview forms, dates and times of day for conducting
Interviews.
Thc applicant should identify any lx)r~ns of trips to be excluded from trip
lcnglk% s~ch as travel on the interstate ~stcm.
cc) Other data itcnm
'l'be County starl'u,~l] s]x'cl~y ~ny other d~i:~ items the applicant will be required
to collcct for the proposed study.
d) l~'oposed data collection methodolo~,
The Coun~ surf w~l review thc applicant's pteposcd methodology for analyztnz the
dam collec~d in the study.
The County staff.will discuss the r~quired formal for submitting the study report This
format ~ould be in general conformance with Format identified in section 4 of these
~ddelines.
Subsequent to this mecti~, 8, the applican! should/ubmh fluee copies of the propascd approach
to thc study lo the Collier County Omce'ofTranspor~doa Services.
The County staff' has $ working days to respond in -~ritimg to the proposed approach. If
County staff'concurs with the proposed approach, the applicant will be notified lo proceed with
the study. Il'County staff.dLsagrees with the proposed approach, County stalTwfll Identify the
problem areas for the applicant. The applicant should receive concurrence from County staff
before proceeding with the s~dy.
Contents and format of the study report
The applicant should compile the study l'mdinss into a report structured as follows:
o Table of contents
o Lctlcr of trnn~Jttal
o F'mdin~s o£the report: Trip generation rate
Trip Icog~h and % new trips
o lmpacl fie calculations
3
,oo, P.,52,',. 178'
Appondiccs:
Trip generation rate summary
T~ip length work~h~t
New trlp~ worksh~t
~p g~ncr~fion d~ta
In.ow ro~
Collecting trip generation data ·
The applicant will b~ required to place the machine counters at project driveways, for a
minimum o£ seven consecutive days of 24-hour machine counting, on days representative of
typi:al traffic patterns at that sit~ (not during a holiday, for example).
The data to be collected includes:
o Date and timc~ o£counts,
o A summary o£counts by 15 minute increments (ct~tering, exiting and total),
o Average daily volume., and
o Volume during the am and pm peak hours of the adjacent strut.
The applicant must verily the correct olxration of the machine counters by manually observing
their proper data logging for at least fifteen minut~ on at least four occasions. Two of the four
occasions can be verillcatlons performed' at the start and finish of the counting period, This
manual verification must be documented in the study report.
The applicant will include the machine count data in the study report. All data is subject Io
review and acceptance by County staff, based on currently accepted traffic engineering practice.
County staffmay visit the study site to observe the p[acernent and operation of the machine
Il'the applicant is unable Io obtain machine counts according to the above requirements, he may
repeat the entire count or may elect to submit an explanation in writing to the County staff.
The County staff will review the explanation and then may accept the data as is, approve a
partial recount, or require an entire recount. The County staff will provide this response
verbally within five days and in writing within ten da)~.
Collecting trip length and ~ capture data
The origin/dtitinatlon survey will collect the I'ollowing information:
o Date of the interview,
o Location or the interview,
o Name of the interviewer,
4
,oo, 179
o Time of da)' of the tnlervlew,
o Origin o£1h¢ intervlewee's trip, ·
o Destination ol'the interviewee's trip, and
o Trip purpose,
The plac~ of origin or d~tlnation can be uscMly express.ed in a variety of wa~ depending
upon how thc inte~','icw~c chooses to describe them. The origin and d~stination should be
determined with on.~ of thc following methods:
o T'ne specific name of the place (mall, tow~, bank, su pe rmarket, subdivision, school,etc.)
o The address or the place
o The i~tersection nearest to the place
o The major iaters~ctlon near~st to the place
The most preferred method to the least pre£erred method is indicated by the order listed above.
The applican t will find it helpM for i,~lervle~rs to have a good prior knowledge or the places
and major intersectlous in the community that ar~ most likely to be named by interview.s so
the interviewers can q~ckly r~cogniz~ a_nd record thel,;e respo ~ses when interviewees give them.
Usually som~ places named by inlerviewees cannot la ter be pinpointed when the in tervicw l'orms
are tabulated, disqu-.lLCying those interviews as observations. For that reason the applic~t is
prudent Io conduct a quantity ol'interviews well in excess o['the min [rnlJ.rn required s~mple alz~'.
The applicant will use an interview form to r~cord the interview respop__~_, An acceptable
format for this form is shown in the Exhibit - Blank Form section. This suggested fol:m has
fields to record all the data items specified above, as well as fields for the trip lenglh tabulated
later, and fields for quality control. The applicant should include copies of the completed
interview forms in the study reporl.
It is not acceptable to collect trip length as estimated and reported by the interviewee, as this
practice has been shown to produce erroneous results. The proper method to determine a trip
length is u.~ a scaled map to measur~ the shonesi route between the r~poned plaees ol:oHgin
and destination, or to measure the distance directly ttsing a vehicle odometer.
For each diiTerent response, the applicant will plot the location ofeach origin and destination
on a map. Identical responses (same places of origin and des~afion) need be plotu:d only once.
To determine whether the trip is to be classified as a new trip, the appllcan~ drax~$ a rectangle
on the map with the origin in one comer and the destination in the opposite comer. Ir thc
interview site is outside this rectangle, the trip is considered a new trip; otherwise, it is not.
The percent new trips is calculated by dividing the number o£new trips by the total number of
u'ips generated at the site.
The applicant should also include in the study report:
o Thc number or observations (useable interview r~sponscs),
o The mean trip length, rounded off to 0.1 mile, and
o The percent new trips.
' 7 Nmnb~r of interviews to conduct
In determining a rta.sonable estimate of the trip length and percent new trips the applicant will
~,'-' IX:florin sur~eys at three sites for three days. These survt:ys will be conducted for nine hours
>L ' each day. Thc specific time period to be covered will l:c governed by the type of land is l~ing
~?~ :. surveyed and the typical daily operations ofthe spccilic ]au d u.~. Thc total surv:y hours should
,'. be approximately eighty-one hours (81) (3x3xg=81).
it Calculation of thc alternative impact fcc
": :' The applicant will use the information derived from th,.' alternate traffic study to calc,date an
;~,<, alternative impact fcc. The applicant should £fll out the Alternate Impact Fee Worksheet and
· include it in the study reporL
" In lite Exhibit - Blank Form section there is a blank AJtetuate Impact Fee Worksheet.
Submitting the study report
~' The applicant should dclivcr live copies of the study r~l:~rt to thc Collier Cou. uty office of
Transportation Scrvke. This study must be certified by an Professional F. uglneer registered in
" thc Un~ted States.
'7.' '~, '
,,.~ 10 County review of thc study report
,~.~:.. :..' If the study is dccmed insufficient to warrant further review, the County olTke or
..'::'. Tra~portation Services will request the applicant to provide further information. This request
,';. w~l be provided in writing within one week.
Irtho study report is deemed sufficient, County staff will make a determination of agreement
~" or disagreement with the accuracy and findings and notify the applicant in writing within 30
;.,' ~' ' wor{'.ing days.
BLANK FORMS
H - Home, W -, Wod(. R - Retail, O., Other Tindale-Oliver and Associates Initials: QC scan . , T-L calcu, ation$ . T-L QC __
of ~y Na~ ~ Ne~e~ ~n ~rp.' 1-757
am H W Y
: ~ R O _N
Y
~ H W
: ~ R O N
: ~ R O N
~ H W
~ : ~ R O N
: ~ R O N
~ H W
,~ R 0
~ m H W
~m H W Y
~ H W Y
~m H ~ Y
~l R O N
~ H W Y
H - Horn. W - W~. R - Re~il, O - ~her ~ndale-Ol~er ~d ~tes Initials: ~ ~n _, T-L ~t~s , T-L ~
Origin/Destination Study
H W ~ ~ W -Y
H W H W Y
R 0 fl 0 N
Y
H W H W
~ 0 R 0 N
~ H W H W Y
H W H W Y
H W H W Y
R 0 R 0 N
H W Y
H W H W Y
R O R O N
H W H W Y
R O R ~ N
H W H W Y
R O R O N
H W H W
R 0 R 0 N
H W H WI Y
R O .... R O
Origin/Destination Study l,.,~we~. !
~i~,~ I~-I o. I~ I'~-
iat~ N~ I ~r~t intGr~ I~'ILT~?I r~ I state
~ R Y
O 'R y
G R Y
O R Y
G R Y
O R Y
B H
· G = Gas, R - Retail. B -, Both Tlndale-Oliver and Associates Initials: QC ~c~n ~, T-L catcula, tions .. T-L QC
'": · TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET
I. E,~t~ b. tlsh
A. D..x ed_Q _d~.e~ia
~ l. Lane Capacity g,635 trJpx per day Project Name
2. Construction Cost $__ Type Development
3. Fuel Tax $0.122 per gallon Submitted by
4. Fuel Efl3clency 18 mil~ per gallon Date.
5. Pr~ent Worth Factor 10.5940 (20 year (~ 7%)
6. Number ol'work day~ per year
I. Trip Generation Rate Trip Ends Per
2. Size of Facility (i.e. ~l.lL, acres, ~eats)
~ 3. Average One-Way Trip Length ('20 year build-out)
~ Il. COrn p u I ¢._T.t ip_ En.d ~t.~_cj._])_,-W
C.J'I Generation Rate ( ) x Size ( ) = TE',qDay
~ ;~ III. Qem~ute_Lane_LM_il_m per 12)a_gv
· ' .~.~L'.._'d.ay ( ~ x Ave. Tr;r, ~h ( ~ = :.~ne .......
..~ Lane Capacity (8,685) x 2 (One-way trip)
Iv.
Lane miler/day ( ) x Cost/lane mile (S ) = $
V. .Q)mpute Fuel Tax Credit
w---o--[k-D--a .~.~_fYr ( ) x TE's/'I~¥ ( '1 x Trio I~.n~lh f
Milex/gal (20) x 2 (one-way
X'r. .C.O _mr, uJv_b2_e.L[m, na c t Fee
(.';ro~, Fee (~ )- Tax Credi, (S ):S riel Jmpac[ fee
T;'~t4,~l¢-Ollvf'r ~nd A.'~.~oclatc.% Inc.