Ordinance 94-22 ORDINANCE NO. 94- 22
AN 'ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE
NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED' FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR
.~- ~AMENDMENTS TO: POLICIES, UPDATE FOR COSTS AND
? .~REVENUE AND SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS OF
~c: ~THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; TEXT AND TABLES
.~. ~OF THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT; TEXT OF
;-~ -= laTHE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION AND DENSITY
_3 -- ~RATING SYSTEM SECTIONS OF THE FUTURE LAND USE
.... ~ELEMENT.; THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES; TEXT,
Il_ ~-- ~,~TABLES, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND EXISTING AND
~ ~FUTURE CONDITION MAPS OF THE TRAFFIC
~ ~ELEMENT; TEXT OF THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA
MASTER PLAN; THE GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND US
MAP; AND TEXT OF THE IMMOKALEE MASTER PLAN; BY
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier
County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 19S9; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has held public hearings to provide for
and encourage public participation throughout the 1993 plan amendment
process; and
WHEREAS, Collier County did submit the 1993 Growth Management
Plan Amendments to the State,and Planning Agency for preliminary
review on November 3, 1993; and :
WHEREAS, the State Land Planning Agency did review and make
written objections to certain sections of the proposed Plan and
transmitted the same in writing to Collier County within the time
provided by law; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has sixty days from receipt of the
written objections from the State Land Planning Agency to adopt,
adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth
Management Plan; and
W~EREAS, the Collier County Plan-~ng Commission in a manner
prescribed by law did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of
the amendments to the Growth Management Plan on March 17, 1994 and
recommended their adoption by the Board of County Commissioners; and
W~EREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did
take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public
hearings concerning the adoption of the amendments to the Growth
Management Plan on April 12, 1994, and
WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements
of law have been met; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
~J~[_~: ADOPTION OF 1993 GRO~fHMANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS
This Ordinance as described herein, shall be known as the 1993
Growth Management Plan Amendment for Collier County, Florida. The
Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, consists of amendments
to the follOWing~ Policies, Update for Costs and Revenues, and
.. Schedule of Capital Improvements, of the Capital Improvement Element;
Text and Tables of the Recreation and Open Space Element; Text,
Tables, Objectives, Policies, and Existing and Future Condition Maps
of the Traffic Circulation Element; Text of the Land Use Designation
Description and Density Rating System Sections of the Future Land Use
Element; the Future Land UeeMap Series; Text of Land Use Designation
Description Section of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan; the Golden
Gate Area Future Land Use Map; and Text of the Immokalee Area Master
Plan Policies.
~~ Severab.ility.
If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or
unconstitutional by any court of competent Jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and
such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion.
~: Effective Date.
The effective date of this plan amendment shall be the date a
final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or
Administration Com~ission finding the amendment in compliance in
accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs
,oo 065P,G 3'72
earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses
dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has
become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the
Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be. made
effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status,
a copy of which resolutions shall be sent to the Department of
Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2740 Centerview Drive,
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
1994 0~~F COUNT
Collier County. this 12 day of April, .
~. ,~ ~ '-,1~
A~TEST: J/' BO Y COMMISSIONERS
· ~, ,.- / ..'",~.\ / , _ , By.'
,- .. ~ / ...., ~, ~ ~CO~%~ANTINE
· ,/,) ',.., ·
Ap~o99,~'A~' to form and ..
legal sufficiency:
Marjo~ie M. StUdent
Assistant County Attorney Thls ~e ¢11~4 with m.
....~. cr~c, ry of_Stat,'~ Office_ ~e.
and ocknow;e4~gernent_q~ thai,
,,7 / ,
- 3 -
EXHIBIT A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Fifth Annual Update & ~mendment
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
~ROWT~ MANAGEMENT PLAN
Prepared by
~rowth Management Section
Long Range Planning Department
1993
Updated by Ordinance No. 93-78
October 26, 1993
Amendment Transmitted to DCA by Resolution No. 93-493
October 26, 1993
065 375
INTRODUCTION
II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CIE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
III. IMPLEMENTATION CIE
SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS=
Roads Projects CIE - 19
Drainage Projects CIE - 28
~24S Projects CIE - 30
Jail Projects CIE - 31
Library Buildings Projects CIE - 32
Government Buildings Projects CIE - 34
Parks Projects CIE - 3S
Water Projects CIE - 38
Sewer Projects CIE - 44
Landfill Projects CIE - 48
IT. COST AND RETENUES CIE - 49
V. PRO~RAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION CIE - 52
VI. AN]LLYSIS (Support Documents)
Public Facility Requirements Appendix
Capital Improvements Projects Appendix
Capital Improvement Financing Appendix
Capacity
Collier County School Board Appendix
Capital Improvement Program
Timing & Location of Capital Appendix
Improvements:
Current Local Practices
Financing'Plan Appendix
Collier County Fourth Annual Update Appendix
& Inventory Report (AUIR) on
Public Facilities
Indicates portions to be adopted by Ordinance
A6 County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities:
** A6.1 1.39 tons of Solid Waste per capita per year
A6.2 Two years of landfill lined cell disposal capacity at present
fill rates
A6.] Ten years of landfill raw land capacity at present fill rates
'A7 County Parks and Recreation Facilities:
A7.1 Regional Park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000/9o9.
A7.2 Community Park land - 1.2882 acres per 1,000/9o9.
A7.3 Recreation facilities - $168.00 capital investment per
capita (at current cost)
Category B Public Facilities:
County Library Buildings : 0.33 square feet per capita
B2 ~* County Library Collection ~ 1.05 books per capita
B3 County Jail : 0.0024 beds per capita
B4 County Emergency Medical : 0.00006 EMS units per capita
Service
B$ County other Government : 2.58 square feet per capita
Buildings .
B6 County dependent fire
districts:
B6.1 Isle of Capri District - 0.00097 apparatus and stations
~ per capita
B6.20chopee District - 0.00057 apparatus and stations
per capita
Category C Public Facilitiesz
Cl Municipal Streets~
C1.1 city of Naples - not to exceed annual average
capacity of "C" for all streets
Cl.2 Everglades City - annual average of "A" for all
collectors
C2 Federal and State Lands Surface Water Management:
C2.1 Federal Lands Surface Water Management - to protect Natural
Resources, development allowed will be designed so drainage
will have no adverse impact on resources. (No measurable
standard)
C2.2 State Lands Surface Water Management - leased lands for
agriculture to have best management practices per clean water
act. (No measurable standard)
** Amended July 27, 1993
CIE - 6
Doc. Ref: 6995
,oo ,G5
for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the five
year capital improvements plan or for excess capacity. ,
Policy 1.2.5=
The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept
the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable
to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of
the facility.
Polic~ 1.2.6=
Prior to fiscal year 1989-90, the County shall adopt a revised Road
Impact Fee Ordinance requiring the same level of service standard as
adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new
development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance
transportation improvements necessitated by such development.
~olicy 1.2.7:
The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and
Recreation and Library facilities requiring the same level of service
standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess
new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance
Parks and Recreation and Library improvements necessitated by such
development.
Poli~ 1.2.S: $ **
The primary source of funding for CIE Project $400, County Jail,'will
be a General Obligation Bond referendum for approval of a bond issue
to be financed by a new ad valorem tax.
Polia~ 1.2.9I $
If, for any reason, the County cannot adopt one or more of the revenue
sources identified in Policies 1.2.6 through 1.2.8 of this Element and
said revenue sources are identified as needed funding for specific
projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the
Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the
following actions:
A. Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new
facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements
that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth
during the nex~ five (5) fiscal years;
B. .Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements
through a plan amendment facility improvements or new
facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a
service or facility but do not provide additional facility
capacity;'
Amended Ma~ 19, 1992
Amended July 27, 1993
C. Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non-Capital
Improvement £1ement capital project in order to fund an
identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public
facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the
required annual update.
D. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan
amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be
obtained.
E. Do not issue develoDment orders that would continue to cause
a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service
standard.
Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general
governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of
13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application
of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent
fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint.
Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State-shared
revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The
Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the
financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy.
# Amended May 19, 1992
** Amended July 27, 1993
CIE- 11
Ooc.Ref: 6995
,oo 085
REOUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION
SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will
eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out
facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth.
Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the
next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The
month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month
and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated.
Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service
standards as identified within this element and the appropriate
individual element of this Growth Management Plan.
Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service
standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were
not developed for Category B facilities.
CIE - KS
DoG.Reft 6995
CATEGORY A
ROAD PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY S-YEAR CAPITAL IMl~ROVZ34Eh~S
Construction Fiscal Tear StOOO~
Pro4ec~ ~ _Co~oletion 93-94
I Illth Avenue North Future 360 410 770
US 41 - Vanderbllt Dr£ve z
replace 2 lanes; add 2
lanes "
2 Airport Pulling Road (eR-31)
Radio Road - Golden Gate
Parkway = add 2 lanes
3 Ai~pox~c-Pulling ~oad (COMPLETED)
US 41 - Radio Road = add "
~ 2 lanes
4 Davis Boulevard (SR-8%) (COH~LETED)
~ ~ San~a Barbara Boulevard -
~ ~ County Barn Road ~ add
I 2 lanes
· ~ 3555
C.~. ~ $ Golden Gate Parkway (aR-sss) 08/94 12/95 115 3440
OD CR-B$1 - CR-31 z add 2 lanes
6 I~unoka~ee Road (CR-846)
us 41 - ~-?$ ~ replace 2
lanes; add 2 lanes
8 Immokalea Road (CR-Bt6) Future
1-75 - CR-951 z replace 2
lanes; add 2 lanes
CATEGORY A
ROAD PROJECTSZ COLLXU COUNTY S-YEAR CAPITAL IMPrOVeMENTS
10 Xslea of ~p~L ~d (~-~1) 10/94 02/9~ 571V 571~
US 41 - ~cle~na~e
Road = ~eplace 2 lanes~ add
2 lanes
11 Isles of ~pri ~d'(~-gSl) 10/95 12/96 1~ · 5464 5564
SR-84 - Rattlesnake H~k
Road : replace 2 lanes~ add
2 lanes
12 Isles of ~pri ~ad (S~-9~l) (~~)e
US 41 - ~ar~ 8ridge
R-o-W Ac~ls~lo~
13 Xsles of ~pri ~o,d (~-951) (~~)
23rd Ave. S.W. - ~lden
Boulev,rd ~ replace 2
add 2 lanes
iA Pine RAd~e ~ad (~-ag~) (~~)* 1~ 100
US ~1 - ~-31 ~ add 2 lanes~
& Interchange a~ Alit= Road
15 Radio ~ad (~~)
CR-31 - San~a Barba=* Blvd. ~
replace 2 lan~s~ ,dd 2 lanes
1~ ~adAo Road .~tu~
San~, Barber, Bi~. - SR-84 ~
replace 2 lanes~ ~dd 2
~c. Ref8 6994
CATEGORY A
ROAD PROJECTSt COLLIKIK ~ S-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS KLEM23fT
~UB~CtiOU ~Cal Year 8COOOI
17 Rattlasnake I~k ~ad iO/gS 12/96 ~ 3904 3964
US 41 - ~1~ Avenue z
replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes
carlca Road - ~-846
build 2 lanes
20 Gulf Sho~ Dr~ve (D~)
Avenue
Conn. I build 2
22 Santa Barbara Blvd./~an 12/93 10/94 2185 2185
Green Canal -
(CR-896)
23 Vandlrb~lt
US 41 - ~-31 z ~lld 2 lanes
2& Vanderb~lt ba~ hd (~~)
Oaks Boul~va~
CA.GORY A
RoAD FRO$£CTS ~ COL~IgR
~ ~iUCil Year 8(000~
P~ec~
R5 Vanderb~lt Dr~ve (~-~01) ~ture 410 410
lllth- Bon~ta Beach ~d
replace 2 lanes;
add 2 lanem
· 85
~6 ~estclox Road (~) 85
Carson Road - SR-29
2 lanes
27 Najor Reconlt~ct~on N/~ N/A 2~ 515 530 546 563 2354
In-house ~jor
reconstruct[on it
locations
H/~ H/~ 3~ 309 424 437 563 2033
28 Traffic
HaJor ~nstallat~on at var~s
555~
10/94 12/96 2~ 5356
31 Bon~ta Beach
Vande:b~l~ D~ve to ~un~
l~ne ~ add 1 lane
County)
32 Santa Barbara ~uleva~
B~ck ~oad ~ build 4 lantl
33 ~unty Ba~ aoad 09/9~ 12/9~ 3~5 4043 4358
Davis Blvd. to
H~ck ~oad ~ build 4 lanes
3& Advanced RoN Acquis~t~on N/A N/A. S~ SIS 530 546 563 2654
CATEGORY A
ROAD PROJ~C~S~ COLLIER COURTY S-YEAR CAPZTA~ Z~PROVERENT~ t~q~IT~
~onstructlon ~lsc&l Year S(000~
Pro,act ~ ~
35 Carson Road Future
Lake Trafford Road to
lmmokalee Drive z add 2 lanes
36 New North-Sout~ l~.ad
c~-858 ~o C~-84& ~ 2 lanes
37 Xsles of Capri Ro~d (CR-951) Future
Golden Ga~a Blvd. ~o CR-846 ~
add 2 lanes
38Pedestrian Overpass on $R-29 (CONPLETED)
at Farm~orke~e~£11age
39 &lr~ort-Fullia~ Road 09/94 10/95 2550 1030 3550
Golden Ga~e ParkwaM to Pine
Ridge Road ~ 6 laning
~0 ~oodlette-Frank Road Future
Golden Ga~e Parkwa2 to Solana
Road t & laning
A1 P~ne Ridge F~ad Future 50
A~r~o~t Road ~o l-?S ~
6 lanlng
¢2 Vaaderbllt Beach Road 05/94 08/95 ~250
~$ 41 to Gulfahore Dr£v~ ~
4 lanin~
Doc. ~e£~
CATEGORY A
ROAD PROJEC~SI CO~LIEIt COt~q~ 5-YEAR CAPZT. AL IMPROV~M~T~S
52 LLvin~S~ou Road ~0/97 12/98 380 4558 4938
P~ne R~dge ~o Golden Oa~e "
Par~way : 2 lanes
53 Livingston Road 06/97 08/~8 350 427~ 462~
Golden Ga~e Parkay ~ Radio
Road : 2 lanes
5A Bald Eagle Drive ~turo 567 567
l:orth and South of US 41 :
4 lanes
55 Airart-Pulling Ro~ 10/97 10/98 412 2504 2916
Vanderbll= Beach ~o
56 San~a Barbara Blvd. ~ure 300 398 ~98
co~den Ga~e Park~a~ ~o Radio
Road : 6 lanes
57 Livingston Road ~ture 386
I~.=okalee Road to Vanderb~Xt
Beach Road : 2 lines
58 L~v~ags~on ~oad ~ur* 386
Vanderbil~ Beach R~d ~o
~idge Road t 2
~AT£GORY A
coustruction Fiscal Year ~¢000~
Pro~ect ~emence.ent ~oletion 93-9& ~ ~$-96 ~6-~ ~
North ll~h Street (I~kalee) ~0/95 02/96 159 159
Ro~'ta ~vc~uo to SR-29 ~
2 lan~s
C~rc~al Pa~r/Int~relt N/A N/A 6~ 600 600 600 600
Enviro~ental ~l~a~lon N/A N/A 250 1030 265 2~3 281 2099
Isle o~ ~pri ~ad (~-~51) ~ture ~06 ~0~
Golden Gate Par~ay to Davis
Boulevard ~ Add 2 lanes
~lden Gate ~ule~a~ ~ure 618
CR-951 to Wilson ~ulevard z
Add 2 lanes
Vanderbilt Beach R~d ~ture 338 338
Airart Road to I-TS t
2 lanes
~ RO~S S~ 12850 2088X 122~4 ~265 IA~53 68023
Notes ~
Completed is defined as eitherz (1) in service or (2) unde= construction, at the t~me of the adoption of this"Fif=h
Annual CIE Update & Amendment by the BCC.
CAT£~OR¥ A
ROAD PRO~ECTSI C~L.T~ZKR
~nst~tlou ~lsc~l Year Sf0001
43 ~am~Am~ ~ri~l bs~ (US 41) 06/95 06/9? 4~ 1803 5803
Dav~s ~uleva~d ~o A~:~
Road (~PZ~ ~114137)
44 ~am~am~ ~ra~l ~ (US
Grade se~ra~on a~ P~ne
R~d~e Road
45 ~am~am~ ~ra~l ~h (US 41) 06/95 06/97 3202 3202
Rettlesnake-H~k ~ad to
47 ~amiam~ Tra~l ~st (US 41) (D~-~)
A~r~r~ Road to RattlesnaLe-
Ha~ck Road
** 3022
a8 DavLs ~uleva~ (SR-84) 06/95 06/9T 620 2402
& Alr~rt Road to County Barn
49 Road (WPI$ 111412~)
50 Tam~a~i Tra~l No~h (US 41) (D~-~)
I~kalee Road to
Pas~
51 Sa-95~ (O~)
riew York Drive to Narco
Bridge
CO~ a S~A:E ~O~S ~T~ 206~2 2~086 ~22~4 ~265 ~4~53 80050
Fundod ~n ~h~ &dop~ed FDOT S-ye&~ ~ork pro, rim
due
~o
ldvlnCl
thLi
**** F~T his 4p~ved I ~ck1~9~ I~itus ~S ~o ~b~lLt~ pro]ec~
~c. Xefz 699&
CAtEgORY A
~l~/on Fiscal Y~ar 8(000~ '-
290 Sto~ter ~st~r Pl~ ..(~~) ,. -,
291 District No. 6 (~ly)
Basin Plan and series of
canals ~nd/or
lmprove~nts "
292 ~rdon liver ~t~nslo~ (D~)
Basin Plan and s~rles of
canals and/or s=~c~ure
improve~nts
~93 Cocohatchee River Systeu
Aerial Happing and Basin Plan
294 Hain ~lden Gate S~st~ (D~)
Aerial ~apping and Basin Plan
29~ Henderson ~eek ~a~ (D~)
Oe~ail~ engin~ring/
enviro~n~al ~asin Plan
296 Fake-Union ~a~ (D~)
Aerial Happen9 ~d Basin Plan
297 Southen ~astal ~8h (D~)
Aerial ~apping and Basin Plan
Aerial ~applng
299 Naples Park DraYage (D~) ,.
~ O 0 0 0 O ,0
CATEGORY A
DRAINAGE PROJECT~:t (:X~.,LIEP. ~ 5-YF.~ CA~I'e--AZ~ XM~KOVEME~T~ ~-~
~lt~ct~on Fiscal Year SfO00~
Notes:
Cc~.pletod Xs de~Xned &8 e~ther: (1) Xn eervXca or (2) under conatruct£on &~ the ~l~na of the adoption o~ thia Fl~h
Annual Cl£ Uf~ate & Az~ndment b~ tho BCC.
CAT£~OR¥ B
EMS pROJECTSz COLLIF.~ COUNTY
301 ~l~/~s~ ~mX~X ~ (~D)
S~a~on and VehXc~e :
Lely/East T~I~I Trail area
302 ~lden ~te Par~ay. ~0/93 09/94 36~ 366
~S Station
Golden Ga~e Par~ay.- Air~r~
Road
303 S~ste~ Status Float Unl~ Unde~e~n~ 366 36~
304 ~S St.~on a~ Vehicle ~ Unde~e~n~
366
366
Location to ~ d~te~ln~
Lcca=ion to
based
306 ~S S~ation and Voh~cle z Undete~n~
Location
based on need
~ 36~ 366 366 366 366 1830
400 Ja~l ' Ex~s~on 06/94 04/96 26242 26242
Increase of 256 ~IL1 ~s a~'
~a~les ~aL1 Center lnclud~n~
A~n~Bt~a~on a~ ~up~rt
FacllltlOs
Doc. Reft
~nst~c~lon Fiscal Year
~ ~ ~ ~2-94 94-~S ~5-~ ~6-~7 Y7-98 ~tal
~00 Hoad~a~ers~d~lon - (~~)*
~6,57S sq. ft. addLtLon "
501 Bast Naples Bran~
Cons~ruc~o~ Of 6,600 ~.f~.
branch l[brar~
502 Collier No~h Branch " (~~)*
3,000 sq.f~, addition
503 Harco Island Bran~ 09/94 04/95 40 409 449
3,~00 sq.f~, addition
504 L~bra~H9 Re,vat,on (D~)
~eflova~e/r~el
comple~on of
505 I~okalee Brach 09/96 05/97 30 288 35 353
3,~00 sq.f~, add~ofl
506 ~lden Gate Bran~ (~~),
3,000 sq.f~, addition
507 Estates Branch 04/94 02/95 82S 826
11,000 sq. f~. Branch
Llbrar~
~ 866 439 288 35
Notes=
Completed is defined as e~ther~ (1) in service or (2) under construction at the tiJ~e of the adoption of this
An~u61 CIE Ut~d&te & Amend~en~ by the BCC
CA~£GORY ~t
COV£~NT BUILDINGS
600 Ne~ CoU~houSe
~3,000 sq.ft, to ~ c~pleted
a~ a future
~01 ~c~ Bealth ~ld~n9 (~~)
~0,000 sq.f~, f~n[sh~.+
in FY91/92 ~o house health
rela~ed activities,
Services, Veterans Services
and PublEc ServEces
A~Enlstra~on
~04 Building W Ex.helen (D~)
~ 1S,O00 sq.f~, ex.helen of
~ warehouBe + day care facility
12,000 sq. ft.
for agricultural
emergenc~ o~ra=ln
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notes:
* Completed is defined es either: (1} in service or (2) under construction at the time of the adoption o~
Annual CIE Update & Amenchaent by the BCC
C~T£GORY ~
~astn~/o~ ~iscal Yesr S~O001
701 Bicycle ~alls ~nt~flu~s
Paved trails ll~klng to
sch~ls or existing trails ;'
~02 6th ~itI Park - ~ase I 10/93 06/98 1~ 250 1000 lO00 1000 4250
Land G Phase l
(32 acres)
~03 Conunlty Park Phase II
Facilities for ~r~
Naples, Golden Gate G
~orch
~ 1200
· ~01 Co~unit~ P~I 06/93 ~2/94 ~2~
~ ~ 25 me,er ~1 In l~kalee
I ~05 Recreation Faclllt~ - 06/93 ~2/94
~existing fac~licies and
u~rade
70~ Regional Parks 500 500 500 500 2000
CATEGORY A
~ ~/scal Y~ar 8(000~
Ga~e Park
~0~ ~rack and Field (~-~)
710 Boat Ramps - ~t~lde ~ntinuous 5~ 500
Boat launch,
ba~h-house
7~1 ~th Co~it~ Park.. Phase I , 0~/~3 10/94 2824 ~824
& IX ~ V/neMa~s (32 acres)
?12 8~h ~u=Lty ~ark - ~hase I 09/93 09/95 ~343 3~00 2843
(~5 acres)
713 naref~ bach (~XonaX 10/93 09/94
Park) S~or~a~er
CAT£GORY A
PARKS PROJEC"/~t COLLXF.~CO~IN'/~ 5-YEARCAPZTALXMI~JtO~M~~
714 Regional Park - Or~get~e 10/93 09/94 ~0 200
~15 Vanderbllt Beach Phnse Ill 10/93 09/94 210 210
Bath House and Dune ~k-
716 Athletic F~elds and ~s 12/93 09/94 1924 1~24
Ease ~aples C~nI~y Park
and South
71~ T~gerta~l Beach Park 10/93 09/94 261 261
Parking
718 ~llXer ~unty ~et C1~ (D~)
TeflnXs Courts and
Ball Courts
495
~19 Clam Pass 10/93 09/94 495
U~Xl[tXe8 and Boardwalk
11583 2250* 1500 1500 1500 18333
Includes $750,000 In ¢_~_ un£ty Pa~k Impact Fees carried forward fro~ FY93/94
Doc. Reft 699&
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJgCTS~ COl..t.lE~.
~ Fiscll year 9(000~
P~ec~
801~ttlesnake H~ ~ad 20' (~~)
L.F. of 20' Wateg
802 ~unty h~ ~ad 16' (~~)
5900 L.F. of 16' Mateg
803 Dav~s ~uleva~ Ii' (~~)
11070 L.F. Of 16' Ma~eg ~Xn
804 Dav~s ~uleva~ 20' (~~)
2640 L.F. cf 20' Ma~er
80591s~ Avenue 12" Intern. (~~)
200 L,F. of ~2" Wa~oF
806 ~th S~e~ 12" Intern. (~~)
808 Aud~on ~untI C1~ 15' (~~)
5230 L,F. of 16' Wate~ Hain
809 Caries Road ~p~
810 CaFica Road =ask (~~) *
Wa~er S~o~ige Ta~ a~ ~nd
replaceMn~ coati ~o Naples
811 ~nd for No~h R~. (~~)
~rea~men~ ~ Land A~a~on
812 Coral Raef wellfiold Stud~ (~~)
813 ~d~o Road ~2' (~~)
2430 L.F. of 12' Wa~e~
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJEC-~S ~ COLLIER
als PAne Ridge ~ad 16' (~~) ..
5~80 L.F. of
816 ~lette ~ad ~tension 16' (~~)
10560 L.F. of
817 Seagate Drive 12' (~~)
2640 L.F. or 12' ~a~er ~ain
818 Al~ ~ad 16' (~~)
10,560 L.F.
819 l~kalee ~ad'20" (~~)*
2000 E.F.
~20 ]~kalee ~d 20' (~O~)
3500 ~.F. o~ 16' Ma~eF Hain
5840 E.F. or
823 ~-9~X ~2' (~~)
23?00 L.r.
82A ~-9~2 ~2' (~~)
5500 ~.~. o~
825Ra~lesaake-~k ~a~ 20' (~~)*
7920 E.F. o~ 20" M&~e~
826 6t~ S~reet X2' (~~)
6600 ~.r.
82~ Gui fshore
1258S L.F. of 16' Water Ha~n "
~c. Reft 699A
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJECTSt COLLIER COUNTY .~-YEAR CAPITAL IJ4PROV~MZ3~
828CoFal Reef Wellfield Phase ! (DELETE)
Phase I of Xaster Plan PrJJect
829 North ~uuty R~, T~a~nt (~~)
Plant I Cons~c~l~n o~ ~or~h
Coun=y R~onal
830 ~okaleo Road ~6' (D~}
105~0 L.F. of 36' Wa=er
83~ CR-9~1 36' (~P~)
~0560 L,F. of 36' Ma~er ~ain
833 I~okaloo ~id 20" (~~)
5280 L,F, of 20" Ma~er
83& ~ua~l Creek P~ l&" (~~)*
7920 L.F, o~ 16" Ma~e~
835 luokalee ~ad ~6" (~~)
2640 L,F, o~ 16" ~a~er
836 ~uokalee R~d 12" (~~)
5280 L.F. of ~2- ~acer
8~7 L~v~ngs~ou Road Ext, 16" (~~)
23600 L.F. of 16" water ~a~n
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJECTS~ COY~F~ CO~ 5-YEAR CAPXTA~
.. ~ r~.c~l Y~ar S(O00~
839 Old US 41 16' (~~)*
1800 L.F. of 16' Wa~er
840 PAne Ridge ~ad 16'
7920 L.F. of 16= Wat~ ~in
64~0 L.F. of 16' Wa~e~'
842 5 MG Gro~d Ta~ (D~)
S~orage Tank &
~ 843 12' Ha~n a~ P~e ~dge ~ad (~~)*
~ fl000 L.F. o~ 12' Wi~er
84412' Nain at Plno lldg* ~ad (~~)
2800 L.F. of 12' Water
~ 8~& 12' Water ~ at US 41 (D~)
~ 6000 L.F. of 12' Water ~n
847 12' Ha~er ~ a~ X~klloe
Road "
~280 L.F. of 12' Water
848 12' Wa~e~ ~ a~ US 41 (D~)
8~00 L.F. of 12' Wa~er
849 North Co~ty Wellf~eld - (D~)
Phase XX
Expansion
~T~-GOR~ &
WATF2t PROJ~C~~J' COLLIEX CO~Jh'~Y 5-YEAR CA~XT~J~ l~~
Extension ~ 10,560 L.F. of
20'
S5316' ~p ~ on Pal~ Drive
11,450 L.F. of 16'
8,000 L.F. o~ 20' Hain fr~
Past
855 12' ~ on hdio l~d (~~)*
21,120 L.F. of 12'
~t~n ~rcia~ D~lve and
Davil ~levard
to ~ue~ ~ 8,000 L.F. of
16' ~ain fr~ Pine ~d~e
~00
857 16' ~h ~ ~ta hrbara : 01/94 06/94 600
5,280 L.F. of 16' Ha~n f~
Dav~s BI~. to ~d~o hd
858 30' ~i~ on ~-951 t 11/93 07/94 2200 2200
15,800 L.F, o~ 30' ~n
Davis Blvd. to Rattlein~e
859 North ~t~ ~atment Plant 09/95 09~96 800 6000 6800
Expansio~ : ~d 4 HGD of
capacity & Se~nd T~k (6.0)
Doc. Refl 699%
CATEGORY A ~ ~ ~ .~,
WATF. R PROJECTS: COLLXER CO~ S-t~.Alt ~XT~ X~O~ ~
~n.~ct Xon Fiscal Year. 8~000~
P~ec~ ~ ~ c~let ion ~3-94 94-95 ?~-96 ~6-97 97-9~'
860 ~u~f~ S~og~ge & Re~ ~ 08/90 09/98 4~ 400 ~00
Up ~o 4 ~GD s~ogage fo~
861 16- ~n - ~ 41 Sout~ (D~)
31,600 L.F. o~ 16' Rain
862 16' ~n - ~ 41 ~uth it (D~)
CR-951 : 15~000 ~.F. of 16'
~& in
86330" ~ln Though Pine Ridge (D~)
6,000 L.F., Of 30'
10~0
864 Plna Ridge ~d, Phase ~ 01/94 09/94
15,000 L.F. of 16'
865 No~h ~t~ T~a~nt PXant *. 09/98 09/99 ~ 6000
Add 4.0 P~D o~ ca~c~=y
~ ' 4600 6400 400 800 6000 18200
* Completed la defined as either: (1} ~n service or (2) under construction &c the tL~e of cho adop=~on of th~s Filch
Annual CIE U~ate G ~n~n~ by the ~.
CAT~GOR¥ ~
~ riscll Yelr 5(000~
P~4ect . ~ ~Dletion 93-J4 94-J3
Design & Conzk~ct~on of
~aste~a~er Facility and
Ef fluen~ Dls~sal
502 Eas~ and South Wapl%s (~~)
Collection
Construction of ~he Facility
904 South County R~, ~a~ent (C~)
906 Utility A~inistratlon (DE~)
Construction
I
907 South ~unty P~p, ~s & (~~)*
~08 8' Force ~n ~ ~p S~a~lon 11/93 07/94 (~ CIE
15 to P~p ~tation 20
10,800 L.F. Of 8' FO;Ce
~0) 12' Force ~L= t ~p StatLon ~1/93 0~/94 1100 1100
19 to P~p Station 20
11,300 L.F. of 12u For~ Hain
~10 10' Force ~n - ~v~ Blvd. (~~)
Pump S~a~on 11 to Santa
Barbara Bouleva~ I 2,400
L.F. of 10" Force ~n
CA'~'ZCOR"Z' &
~ F~scal Year 8fO~
911Dav~s Blvd. ~p Station 11
Design and
912 10' Force ~n ~v~a BI~. (~~) ''
Pump ~ta~on 14 to ~p
10' Force
913 Davis Blvd. : ~p S~a~on 06/93 05/94
3.~0 Design a~ Conz~c~lo~
914 20° Forca ~ln ~-951/US 41 (~~)
S~ation 1 z 11,400 L.F. or
Force
~15 P~p Station 18 (~~)
Design and Constructio~
11800
916 south Co~t~ R~. ~ea~nt 01/95 08/96 18~ 10000
~es~ga and Cons~c~oa of
917 Ho~h ~ty R~. ~a~ent 09/93 09/95
3 ~D Fac~l~t7
918 20' Force ~a~n
Rattlesnake-H~k hd -
CR-951 to PolI~ Avenue
11,400 L.F. of 20' Fo~
SE~r.R pROJEC'£St COLLX~lt COU~T~Y
Pump S~lon 3.RO -
and Construction
Construction
921 1~~ Force N~n (~D)
CR-~51 - ~mp Station 16
922 North cowry R~p Station (D~)
Telemet~ Sy~te~ - ~dio
923 North ~ty Wastewater (~)
TFeatmon~ PXan~
~as~er Pump S~a~lon 1.10
92S Pelican ~y Xmp~vo~n~ (~~)
Dia~ric~ ~ 47,520 L.F. of
Force ~ain and 2 ~p
S=a=lons
926 I~okalee Road Se~r/ (~~)
Effluent S2stem ~ Force
& Effluen~ l~ne fr~ N. Plan=
to Quail Creek
CAT~GORY A
$~w~R FRO4£CTS ~ COLLI ~1
1.07 : 2 p~p s~a=lonu on
~ka~ee
928 2~~ Force ~ln
1.07 : 20,000 L.F. o~ Force
~ain fr~ Alr~r~ R~d ~o
Orange Bloss~ Drive
929 Pump station 3.17 12/93 08/94 7~ ~0~
US 41 South - ~sign and "
Co~s~ruc~ lo~
930 12' Fo~e ~ln t US 41 Sou~h 12/93 08~94 11~
Pump S~ation ~o Station 3.20
20.000 L.F.
Force Hain
931 Force
I~.=okale. Road - ~all Cr~k
~o CR-951
932 North Count~ Waste~at.r 09/95 06/96 200 1000 ~200
Treat~n~ Plar~
Conversion
6150 10200 1000 1V350
Not~s~
Annual CIE U~a~e & ~n~n= by ~he BCC.
CATL~ORY A
1000 Napl~s~ndfLll ~s~ 01/90 11/95 2~ 200
~nd Ac~lsitlon~
300 acres (when
1001 ~achate ~rea~ent Plent 01/95 08/96 ~50 ~00 1450
Rub-off mna~n~ sad
processing
1002 Naples ~ndf~ll (~~)
Cell ~6, Phase II
1003 Haoles ~ndflll (~~)
1004 Naples ~nd~&ll 10/93 01/95
Cells 3 ~ 4 Closure
1005 Naples ~ndfill 10/94' 10/95 1258 1258
cell 6 Closure
1006 Naples ~ndf111 11/95 12/97 1223 1~ 1435 1600 6312 I06~0
Develop 300 acres
1007 l~kalee 11/95 10/97 100 2180 2280
Cell Cons~ction
1008 I~kalee 10[93 01/95
Closure, ~ndflll Cell 1
~ '3531 2980 1435 1600 6312 15858
* C~pleted ~s def~n~ as e~the~z (1) ~a se~Lc~ og (2) unde~ conut~c~on
Annual CIE u~ate G~n~nC by the
COSTS & REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY
In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public
facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the
5-year (FY94-98) amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is
a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All
deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is
the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to
pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of
service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5.
COUNTY ~RTERI~Ja .& COLLECTOR RO~DS $ 68,023,000
LESS Available Revenues:
Gas Taxes $40,J36,000
~. Road Impact Feee 21,237,000
~ .... Carry Forvard 6,200,000
:'~" Developer Contr~bution 250,000 68,023.000
~ Balance 0 '
:.- . ST]~TB ROADS NL"I~ORK i2,02'~,000
.LESS State~Federal Gas Taxes 12.027.000 .'*
? ' Balance O
,: ,"." DRAIFAGB PL/~NS ~ PROJECTS Balance '0
~ATER & SEWER SYSTEMS '. 35,550,000
LESS System Development Fees/User Fees
':' Balance 0
;
geLID ~ASTE/L~FILL 15,858 ~ 000 '
LESS Solid Waste User Fees 15.8§8.000
'~ ' Balance 0 "
~.. CIE - 49
~?' Doc. Ref: 6995
P~ItKS & RECREi~TION 18,333,000
LESS Available Revenues:
Park Impact Fees 16,438,700
Boating Improvement Funds 850,000 17. 288.700
Deficit (1,044,300)
EKE~G~C~MEDIC~ SERVICE 1,830,000
LESS E~tS Impact Fees ~
Balance 0
J~IL 26,242~000
LESS G.O.B. Referendum 26. 242.000
Balanoe 0
LIBRARY
Bulld£nga 1,628,000
Collection : 2,255,000
Total Library Costs 3.883.000
LESS Library Impact Fees 2,773,900
Defio~t ( 1,109,100}
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS Balance 0
:
FIR~ DISTRICT
': .Isle of Capri 0
...i,!' Ochopee ~
,* Balance 0
Subtotal Deficit of Restricted Revenue vs. Costs (2,153,400)
CIE - 5O
Doc. Ref: 6995
ADD Unrestricted Revenues:
Ad Valorem Taxes
(capital Revenue Fund) 2.153.400
]]alance $ o
COLLZ~COUIIT~ '
;'repared B2
Collier county
and Recreation
Janua~ 6, 1989
· Februa~, I991
' ~ay 19, 1992
April 12; 1994
RE-lr~ZNT~D FEBRU~,~Y, 1991
RE-PRZ~TED 8 RE-FOP~t~TTED ~%Y, 1992
GOAL 1; PROVIDE SUFFTCTENT PARKS~, RECRFJ%T'rON F~CTL'rTTES ~ oPEN
SPACE AREAS TO HEET THE NEEDS OF RES'rDENTS ~%ND VISITOR5 OF
COLLIER COUNTY.
OBJECTI?E 1.1= ·
Ensure that a comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities
is available from among facilities provided by the County, other
governmental bodies and the private sector by September 30, 1994.
The following level of service standards for facilities and land
owned by the County or available to the general public are adopted=
BTI~NDI%RD OF SERVICE= ~
A. 1.2882 acres of community park land/1000 population -"..
B. 2.9412 acres of regional park land/1000 population
c. Recreation facilities. Facilities in place which have a value (as
defined) of at least $168.00 per capita of population. A
Construction Cos= Index (CCI) adjustment will be used t6 det~rmine
the construction cost of fac£1ities planned. The CCI that will be
used will be the prior year of the County's fiscal year budget.
1. Value will be arrived at using the per unit values for each
facility type available in the County as set forth in Table A
applying the values to the number of each facility type,
adding up all values and dividing the total by the County
population.
2. Where recreation facilities provided by other governmental
bodies or the private sector are available through arrange-
ments with the County to the public on a convenient basis,
they shall be considered in measuring in place facility
value.
Policy 1,1.2=
Encourage the continuation and expanded use of public school and other .
public and private facilities Dy the general public to maximize the
benefit from available facilities.
Policy 1.1.3,
Ensure that economically disadvantaged individuals will not be
re~ricted from any participation due to financial hardships.
Acquire suitable lands for new park sites in areas where major
population growth is expected.
RO-I-5
*# TABLE A -.
TYPE OF FACILITY VALUE PER UNIT
Amphitheater 100,000
Baseball Fields 550,000
Basketball/Volleyball 25,000
Bicycle Trails : Miles 28,900
Boat Ramps : Freshwater 250,000
Boat Ramps : Saltwater 250,000
Children's Playground 50,000
Community Centers 1,000,000
Community Pool 1,500,000
Competitive Swimming Pool 1,500,000
Fitness Station Trails 76,000
Football~Soccer Fields 350,000
.Gymnasiums 1,450,000
Jogging Trails : Miles 50,000
P~'cnic
Pavilions 50,000
Racquetball Courts 25,000
Recreation Center 2,000,000
Shuffleboard Courts 25,000
Softball.Fields 350,000
Tennis Courts 25,000
Track & Field 0
* Amended February 5, 1991
/ Amended May 19, 1992
RO-I-12
LEVEL OF SERVICE STJtNDARD: $168.00 of recreation facilities inventory value per capita
(at current cost)*
(~) (~) (~) (4) (5)
" REQUIRED
STAND~RD FOR 9/30/98
" PER 1000 POPULATION OF VALUE
TYPE OF FACILITY PERSONS 241.050 HR UNIT
Amphitheater 0.0118 3 100,000 300 000
Baseball Fields 0.03§3 8 550,000 4,400 000
Basketball/Volleyball 0.1765 40 25,000 1,000 000
Bicycle Trails: Hi'les 0.0553 13 28,900 375 700
Children's' Playgrounds 0.1059 24 50,000 1,200 000
Conmunity Centers 0.0353 8 1,000,000 8,000000
Community Pool 0.0059 I 1,500,000 1,500 000
Fitness Statior Trails 0.0353 8 76,000 608 000
Football/Soccer Fields 0.0353 8 350,000 2,800 000
4,000 000
Recreation Center 0.0059 2 2,000,000
Jogging Trails: Miles 0.0353 8 50,000 400.000
Competition Pool 0.0059 1 1,500,000 1,500 000
Picnic Pavilions 0.0706 16 50,000 800 000
Racquetball Courts 0.1412 32 25,000 800 000
Shuffleboard Courts 0.0706 16 25,000 400000
Softball Fields 0.0706 16 350,000 5,600 000
Tennis Courts 0.0706 32 25,000 800.000
Boat Ramps 0.1059 24 250,000 6,000,000
Track and Field 0.0059 0 0 0
TOTAL 40,483~700
Value per cap~t~ (Value~241~%$0 population) $ 168.00
NOTE: * A Construction Cost Index (CCI) adjustment will-be used to determine the value per uni~.
The CCI adjustment used will be equal to the prior year of the County's fiscal year budget.
COLLIER COU~'~
(~) ~enGe~ Dec~e~ XTr ~ggX ~o ~en~e~t~ ~e to
(~) ~e~e4 ~y ~, xsg2 O=~ce ~o. 92-34
(~Z) ~e~4e4 ~u~l~ 4~ xgg2 O=4i~e ~o. 92-50
(~XXX) ~e=4e4 ~eM~ X6, X~93 O=4i~oe ~o. 93-08
(ZX) ~e~de4 ~ 25~ Xg93 O=~A~oe ~o. 93-24
!. ., T~BLE OF CONTENTS .
· ' Page
'"'~'~ T~BLE OF CONTENTS i
Z · Ov~.,KVI EW
¥' ~.. PURPOSE 1
B. BASIS I
~,. C. UNDERLYING CONCEPTS 2
"' Protection of Natural Resource Systems
" Coordination of Land Use & Public Facilities
Hanagsment of Coastal Devslopment
Provision of Adequate & Affordable Housing
Attainment of High Quality Urban Design
Improved Efficiency and Effectiveness in the
Land Use Regulatory Process
Protection of Private Property Rights
D. SPECI~J~ ISSUES- 5
Coordination of Land Use and Public Facility
Planning
Level of Service Standards
Vested Rights
* II. IHPLEHENTXTION STRATEG~
~OALg~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 10
FUTURE L~NDUBE DESIGNATIONS DES~IPTION 8E~ION
Urban Designation
Density~ing System
Agri~ltural/Rural Designat~on
Estates Oesignat~on
Conservation Designation
F~E ~ USE ~P S~IE~ In P~ast~o Pocket
(IX) F~E ~ USE ~P BERIEB 46
ZONING RE-~UATION PROG~ - CO~CIAL ~D~
~IT~IA - ~P B~IES
III. SUPPORT DOCUMENT ~ L~ND USE DATa.ND ANJtLYSIS
(Separate Table of Contents)
* Indicates adopted portions of Element
i: ,. LU-I-i
065 lJ.9
3. Affordable Housing (VI}
Affordable Housing Density Rating System - FLUE : To encourage the
provision of affordable housing within the Urban Designated Area~ a
maximum of 8 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base
density if the project meets the definitions and requirements of the
Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Ordinance $91-102, adopted
October 30, 1991).
a. Residential In-fill
To encourage residential in-fill, 3 residential dwelling units per
gross acre may be added if the project is 10 acres or less in size
located within an area with central public water and sewer service.
The following conditions must be met: the project must be compatible
with surrounding land uses; the property in question has no common
site development.plan with adjoining property; there is no common
ow~ership with any adjacent parcels; and the parcel tn question was
not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density.
$. Roadwa~ Access (IV)
If the project has direct access to 2 or more arterial or collector
roads as identified in the Traffic Circulation Element, I residential
dwelling unit per gross acre maybe added. Density credits based on
future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to construct
a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County Transportation
Department) or the road is scheduled for completion during'the first
five years of the CIP.
Cor~istency with the following characteristic would subtrac~ density:
1. If the project is within the area identified as subject to
long range traffic congestion which consists of the western
coastal Urban Designated Area seaward of a boundary marked by
Airport Road (including an imaginary extension north to the
Lee County boundary), Davis Boulevard, County Barn Road and
Rattlesnake Hammock Road consistent with the Activity
Center's residential density band located at the southwest
quadrant of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and
County Road 951 (including an imaginary extension to the
east), I dwelling unit per gross acre would be subtracted;
and
2. If the project fails to interconnect with all existing
projects when physically possible and fails to provide inter-
connection with all future adjacent projects, up to I dwell-
ing unit per gross acre may be subtracted as deemed
appropriate by the BCC.
Cond~tionsl
1. The maximum permitted density shall not exceed 16 residential
dwelling units p~rgross acre,except when utilizing the
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) section 2.2.4.10 of the
Land Development Cods. The TDR Section allows for the
maximum number of residential units permitted under the
zoning district to be exceeded by a minimum of twenty percent
LU-I-24
~.(20%) and shall otherwise be consistent wLth the Density
Rating System.
2. The maximum permitted density shall not exceed 4 residential
dwelling units per gross acre within the Traffic Congestion
Area which includes the Coastal Management Area, unless it is
increased through conversion of commercial zoning, provision
of affordable housing, use of the provision for residential
ln-fill,~use of the Transfer of Development Rights Section of
the Land Development Code, or for density awarded within the
boundaries of an Activity Center. Properties adjacent to the
Traffic Congestion Area shall be considered part of the
Traffic. Congestion Area if their principal access is to a
road forming the boundary of the Area. In the Coastal
Management Area, TDR's shall only be transferred from "ST"
parcels located within the Coastal Management Area to
receiving areas within the Coastal Management Area and shall
otherwise be consistent with the Density Rating System.
(1~)3. The maximum permitted density shall not exceed 4 residential
(VII) dwelling units per gross acre within a portion of the Coastal
Management Area which is bounded by the City of Naples to the
west, US 41 to the north and the Area of Critical.State
Concern to the east, excepting Marco Island, which shall be
allowed up to 6 dwelling units per gross acre for projects
that qualify for a commercial zoning conversion bonus as set
forth in the Density Rating System. Any project qualifying
for such a bonus shall prepare and implement a hurricane
evacuation plan for the project, which shall be subject to
review by the Collier County Emergency Management Director.
A second exception to this density standard shall be made to
allow a maximum of 12 dwelling units per gross acre (maximum
8 dwelling units per gross acre on Marco Island) for afford-
able housing not to exceed a maximum of 600 affordable
housing units in the Urban Coastal Fringe Area provided
appropriate mitigation is provided consistent with Policy
13.1.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element.
The 600 affordable housing units to be allowed in the Urban
Coastal Fringe Area and eligibility therefore will be
determined by uking the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development income definitions, bedrooms per unit and
additional guidelines outlined in the Affordable Housing
Density Bonus (ARDB) Ordinance 90-89 adopted on November 27,
1990 and shall be distributed throughout the Urban Coastal
Fringe. Area based on hurricane evacuation routes as defined
by the Emergency Management Director. All units (including
market rate) awarded by the ARDB Ordinance above the
permitted base density of 4 dwelling units per gross acre,
plus any other density bonus available minus any density
reduction for traffic congestion or coastal management area
shall be counted toward the 600 dwelling unit cap.
A third exception to the density standard would be the ,
provision to increase density through the Transfer of
Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code
provided appropriate mitigation is required consistent with
Policy 13.1.2. of the Conse~vation and Coastal Management
Element and shall otherwise be consistent with the Density
Rating System.
4. Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Parks shall be allowed to
develop at a density consistent with the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Industrial Under
The Industrial Land Use Designation provides for the full array of
industrial land uses as described in the Zoning Ordinance for
Industrial and Light Industrial Zoning Districts. The Plan also
allows for limited expansion adjacent to those Industrial Designations
pro~ided certain conditions are met regarding access, traffic
circulation and infrastructure provision. In addition, certain
Industrial land uses may be permitted within Urban Designated Areas
under criteria.
The follOWing criteria must be met:
The proposed project must be in the form of an Industrial Planned
Unit Development. Intensities of use shall be limited to:
technological research, design, and product development; light
manufacturing, processing and packaging in fully enclosed
building; corporate headquarters~ medical laboratories, clinics,
treatment facilities and research and rehabilitative centers~
printing~ lithographing and publishing; and laboratories.
The boundaries of the proposed project must be transitional,
therefore, the uses along the perimeters must be compatible with
non-industrial uses. The project must have direct access to an
arterial and an internal circulation network which prohibits
industrial traffic from traveling through predominantly
residential areas. The proJec=must have central water and sewer
and shall not generate noise or odor so as to be incompatible with
surrounding land uses.
As a part of the County'~ Land Development Regulations, an Industrial
Planned U~it Development Zoning District shall be established and
include standards for the follOWing=
Standards fpr an overall Hastor Development Plan for the entire
parco1 of land and requ%re Site Development Plan approval for each
lot or building area;
List of permitted uses;
Minimum tract size and lot area;
Buffering, landscaping and open space requirements;
Regulations regarding s~g~g~, l~ght~ng, outdoor storage, parking
and loading;
LU-I-26
Doe. Ref~ 18301NA/GH
Setback requirements and maximum building height.
4. Commercial Under Criteri& (IV) (VI) {VIZ) (IX)
Within the Urban-Mixed Use District certain tn-fill commercial
development may be permitted. This shall only apply in areas already
substantially zoned or developed for such uses. The following
standards which limit the intensity of uses must be met:
a. The subject parcel must be bouDded on both sides by improved
commercial property or commercial zoning consistent with the
Future Land Use Element or commercial property granted an
exemption or compatibility exception as provided for in the
Zoning Re-evaluation Program and should not exceed 200 feet
in width, although the width may be greater at the discretion
of the Board of County Commissioners. Uses that meet the
intent of the C1/T Commercial Professional/Transitional
District are only required to be bounded on one side by
improved commercial property or consistent commercial zoning
or commercial property granted an exemption or compatibility
exception as provided in the Zoning Re-evaluation Program.
For purposes of this commercial under criteria provision,
"bounded on both sides" may include an intervening public
right-of-way that is not adjacent to creeks or water bodies,
provided that the property has frontage abutting an arterial
roadway, is located in an area generally retail commercial in
character or in proximity to zoning that permits retail
commercial uses and the depth of commercial zoning along the
arterial, roadway will not be permitted to a depth any greater
than that of adjoining commercially zoned properties;
b. The proposed use must not generate in excess of five percent
of level of service C design capacity on abutting streets
that provide access to the project; and
c. The proposed use must not exceed a floor area of 25,000
square feet.
Cl/T zoning used pursuant to this subsection shall only be applied one
time to serve as a transitional use and will not be permitted to
expand adjacent to other C1/T zoning. The only exception is the
expansion of Cl/T zoning that was approved pursuant to the Zoning Re-
evaluation Program. The;County shall regularly amend the Future Land
Use Map series to incorporate and be consistent with changes in the
Cl/T zoning within the Urban-Mixed Use District.
B. Urban - Commercial District (I} .
Through the use of mixed use Activity Centers and neighborhood
centers within large PUDs, this District is intended to accommodate
virtuglly all new commercial zoning within Urban Designated Areas.
1. Activity Center Subdistriot (I)[III)(VI}[VIII)(IX)
Mixed Use Activity Centers have been designated on the Future Land Use
Map. The locations are based on inter-sections of major roads and on
spacing criteria. The mixed use Activity Center concept is designed
to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where
,oo 065 423'
LU-I-27
change permitted in the type of land use would allow no more
than 25% variation from the land use mix and intensity
identified for each Interchange Activity Center.
The Planned Unit Development and/or rezoning ordinance document shall
contain specific language regarding the permitted Industrial land
uses, compatibility requirements, and development standards
consistency with the above guidelines, site specific development
details will be reviewed during the Site Development Plan review
(IX) There shall be no minimum acreage limitation for such Planned
unit Developments except all requests for rezoning must be at least
forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone
is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the
Future Land Use Element. All new residential zoning shall be
consistent with the Density Rating System. Hotels and motels that
locate within an Activity Center will be allowed to develop at a
density consistent with the Zoning Ordinance.
Existing commercially zoned and developed areal which are not within
an Activity Center or do not meet other commercial siting criteria
will be allowed to expand only to the extent permitted under the
zoning classification for that property. Expansion involving
aggregation of additional property occurring after adoption of this
Plan shall be subject to the policies of this Plan.
From time to time new Activity Centers may be proposed. The minimum
level of intersection which maybe'eligible for other new Activity
Centers is one with an arterial-collector Junction. Also, no two
centers may be closer than two miles from each other base on center
points. New Activity Centers would require market Justification and
must meet size, spacing and usa limitations expressed earlier.
The intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road is
designated as a Future Activity Center because of the status of
Vanderbilt Beach Road, which is completed from C.R. 951 to Airport-
Pulling Road (east segment) but not from Airport-Pulling Road to U.S.
41 (west segment). The completion of the eastern two-lane segment of
Vanderbilt Beach Road (from Airport-Pulling Road to C.R. 951) now
enables the planning of Activity Center uses in all quadrants. Upon
construction and completion of two-lanes of Vanderbilt Beach Road from
U.S. 41 to Airport-Pulling Road, all quadrants shall be eligible for
Activity Center development in an amount sustainable by available
infrastructure capacity. Until that time, planning and rezoning of
properties within all quadrants of the Activity Center quadrants may
be requested and approved, however, zoning of properties within the
quadrants shall be conditioned so that no final local development
orders (building Dermitl) will be granted for activity center uses
until the completion of two lanes of Vanderbilt Beach Road from U.S.
41 to Airport-Pulling Road. Final Subdivision Plat applications and
Final Site Development Plan applications may be submitted and approved
for activity center uses within the quadrants after commencement of
construction of Vanderbilt Beach Road from Airport-Pulling Road to
,oo 065 424
L~-I-35
U.S. 41. Zoning approval of activity center uses within the quadrants
of this Activity Center shall be subject to re-evaluatiom pursuant to
the procedures set forth in the Collier County Land Development gods
in the event that Board of County Commissioners determines that a
two-lane segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road from U.S. 41 to
Airport-Pulling Road cannot be constructed due to physical or
permitting constraints, and eliminates this road segment from the
Traffic Circulation Element. The activity center use limitations set
forth herein do not apply to, and shall not limit the development of,
uses which are otherwise consistent with the Urban-Mixed Use District
of the Future Land Use Element.
(IX) Access from the roadway network into the Activity Centers shall
be carefully managed. Policy 4.4 of this Element makes a commitment
to develop access management plans for each Activity Center by August
1993. During the interim to the extent possible access points shall
be kept to a minimum and individual projects shall be encouraged to
combine points of access. Coordination of access with existing and
future projects shall be required as appropriate at time of zoning and
site plan approval.
It is recognized that new development within the Traffic Congestion
Area as identified on the Future Land Use Hap will be difficult to
accommodate on the existing and planned road network. Therefore,
proposals for commercial development within the area shallbe subject
to thorough transportation review and appropriate requirements shall
be imposed to coordinate and minimize access points onto the. road
network and to ensure mitigation of all impacts on road capacity.
2. PUD Neighborhood Commerolal
For PUD's of 300 acres or more or with 1,000 dwelling units or more, a
.neighborhood commercial center maybe allowed subJec~ to the following
'standards=
a. Commercial zoning shall be no closer than two miles to the
nearest Activity Center and no closer than two miles from the
nearest PUD commercial zoning of ten acres or greater in
size.
b.The configuration of the commercial parcel shall allow no
more frontage than depth;
c. The commercial parcel shall be no greater than 15 acres in
~lze; and
d. No construction in the commercial designated area shall be
· allowed until 50% of the building permits for the development
are issued unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County
Commissioners.
C. Urban- Industrial Distriot (IV)
The Industrial Land Use District is intended to be reserved for
industrial type uses. Intensities of use shall be those related to
light manufacturing, processing, storage and warehousing, wholesaling,
LU-I-3 6
DO0. Refz 1830/MA/GM
distribution, high technology, laboratories, assembly, storage,
com~/ter and data processing, business services, limited commercial
such as child care centers and restaurants and other basic industrial
uses but not including retail, as described in the Land Oevelopm&nt
Code for Industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts.
Business Parks are intended to include a mix of industrial uses and
offices designed in an attractive park-like environment with'low
structural density where building coverage ranges between 25% to 45%
and large landscaped areas for both the functional use of buffering
and enjoyment by the employees of the park. However, to reserve land
within the industrially designated areas for the intended industrial
uses and to ensure compatibility, Business Parks shall be permitted to
develop with a maximum of 40% commercial uses. Access to arterial
road systems shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access
Management Policy and consistent with Objective 7 and Policy 7.1 of
the Traffic Circulation Element. Commercial uses shall include uses
such as offices, financial institutions, cultural facilities and
fitness centers/facilities, and shall only be permitted within those
areas zoned Business Park or Planned Unit Development within the Urban
Industrial District Land Uss Designation. Business Parks must bm a
minimum of 35 acres in size. The Planned Unit Development and/or
rezoning ordinance document for Business Park Projects shall contain
specific language regarding the permitted non-industrial usgs and
development characteristic guidelines consistent with those'stated
above. Business Parks shall also be required to meet the
compatibility standards as stated under the Interstate Activity Center
Designation for commercial and industrial land uses.
The boundaries of the Urban - Industrial District are transitional~
therefore, the uses along their perimeters must be compatible with
non-industrial uses. All industrial areas should have direct access
to an arterial or collector. In addition access ~ay be provided via a
local road that does not service a predominately residential area.
It is possible that due to changing conditions within the County,
there may be a need for additional industrial land. These condition~
may include build-out or lack of future seL-vices and facilities for
current sites. New industrial land use may be approved outside of the
Industrial District, however, the following criteria must be met: the
rezone shall be in the form of a Planned Unit Development; the
proposed site must not be "spot industrial" and therefore must be
adjacent to existing land designated or zoned industrial;'the proposed
land use ~ust be compatible with adjacent land uses;.and, necessary
infrastructure including an internal road network and central water
and sewer must be provided or in place. In addition, non-contiguous
industrial use ~ay .be permitted in the Urban Designated Area under
the criteria cited earlier.
AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION (VI)
The Agricultural/Rural Land Use Designation is for those areas that
are remote from the existing development pattern, lack public
facilities and services, are environmentally sensitive or are in
agric~ltural production. Urbanization is not promoted, therefore
LU-I-37
· Doss Ref: 1830/MA/OH ~':
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
MAP 3
NATURAL RESOURCES
( WATERWELLS, CONES OF INFLUENCE, RIVERS,
~AYS, LAKES, FLOODPLAINS, HARBORS AND MINERALS
· 8 AME~ED
LEGEND
I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lAY
· / COLLIER
~ ~ O~d~nance No ....
(2) ).mende~ ~a~z~-y, 1990 ~o ~en~ ~de ~o' ~h~s El~en~
(~) ~ended ~e~ ~990 ~o ~en~en~ ~de to ~h~s E~emen~
(~) ~ende~ ~eb~ S~ ~99~ ~d~ce ~o. 9~--X5
( (V) ~ende~ ~c~ XggL ~o ~en~en~ ~da ~o ~hi~ ~leman~
The purpose of the Traffic Circulation Element is to plan for future
needs of both the motorized and non-motorized traveling public. '~he
major highway network in Collier County is the principle circulation
system that permits the delivery of goods and services as well as
providing access to places of employment, schools, and recreation for
the residents and visitors of Collier:County. Since Collier County
does not have any ports, rail lines or high speed rail facilities, no
discussions of these modes appear in this element.
The traffic circulation system is truly the "supply" side of the
"demand versus supply" equation (with land uses being the demand
side). As land uses continue to increase, they place a heavier demand
on the existing s~pply of roadway miles. The roadway system's effect-
iveness is therefore linked to the Future Land Use Element.
In Collier County, one of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in
the Country, both elements must be developed simultaneously. Growth
cannot be projected without knowing where the future road system will
be, and the future road system must be planned with the potential
growth in mind. To that end, land use modeling is an integral part of
the future traffic projection process.
The following steps were taken by Collier County in the devplopment of
the Traffic Circulation Element:
First, the existing system conditions were documented and the future
needs were examined. Later in this Element, the land use forecasting
methodology will be discussed. Secondly, a level of se~lce (LOS)
standard was needed to #measure" the volume versus capacity of the
existing and future systems. Having such a method of measuring the
service standard permits the identification of deficiencies. Lastly,
the future highway needs were examined for four horizon periods:
five (5) years - 1998,
ten (10) years - 2003, and
for the years 2010 and 2015.
The first period is to maintain consistency with the Capital Improve-
ment Element (CIE). The second period is to provide a ten year plan
"window" in which the last five years show the advancement of needed
projects towards the end of the 5 year CIE "window".
The year ~010 and 2015 horizons are included to permit consistency
with the local Hetropolitan Planning Organization efforts. Unlike the
first two periods, which cover the entire county, the 2010 and 2015
periods have a much. more limited study area, generally recognized as
the Naples Urbawized Area.
The remaining portion of the Traffic Circulation Element will take up
a discussion of non-motorized travel demands, the various perspectives
surrounding the Future Traffic Circulation System, and a presentation
of the Element's Goals, Objectives, and Policies.
Collier county is the largest County in the State and spans an area of
over 1,994 square miles (1,276,160 acres). The major central city
area is the City of Naples which covers 11.5 square miles and has a
per~:anent population of 19,881 (April 1, 1993).
The greater Naples Urban Area, loosely defined as the lands west of
CR/SR-951 (including all of Marco Island) covers 129 square miles with
< an estimated permanent population of 126,700. Seasonal ~opul.ation
increases in the Urban Area have been estimated as high as 32% during
the winter months.
Approximately 20 miles northeast of the Naples Urban Area lies the
urban center of Immokalae (an unincorporated community). Immokalee
has a permanent po~ulation of ap~roximately 18,313 but witnesses
substantial seasonal increases associated with the agricultural
industry.
Within the Naples Urban Area, a grid system of prsdominatsly county
roads makes up the major highway network. Major north/south routes
include North Tamiami Trail (US 41), Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851)
Airport-Pulling Road (CR-31), Interstate-75, and CR-951 and SR-951.
The east/west links completing the grid are Immokalee Road (CR-846),
Pine Ridge Road (C~-896), Golden Gate Parkway (CR-886), Davis
Boulevard (eR-84), Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR-864), and East Tamiami
Trail (US 41).
In addition to these major roads, other roads such as Radio Road
(CR-856), Santa Barbara Boulevard, and Vanderbilt Beach Road
interconnect to provide the level of continuity needed to ensure an
adequate network configuration.
Linking the Naples Urban Area and the Immokalee urban center is the
Immokalee Road (CR-846). Within Immokalee, $R-29 passes through to
the south on its way to intersect with Interstate-75, then to US 41,
and finally to Everglades City. The northerly route of eR-29 out of'
Immokalse leads to LaBelle in Hendry County.
In the past fifteen years, the County has made tremendous strides in
keeping up with the ever increasing travel demands associated with
urban growth. This Element describes the continuation of the County's
efforts to provide the means to move people, goods, and services
throughout the County.
Dar
As part of a system-wide approach to mon£toring [uve~ o~ uurvtce
deficiencies, the County maintains two programs that assist in
determining where improvements are warranted.
The State and County Traffic Count programs regularly monitor vehicle
movement activities at more than 100 locations throughout the County.
Historical data from as far back as 1973 provide thc basis for
assisting with the projecting of futura demands upon the system. The
annual average traffic volumes are provided in the Traffic Circulation
Element Support Document.
In addition to traffic volumes, accident frequency data is the next
most important factor considered by the County when determining the
nsed for improvement in the system. Traffic accident statistics, by
intersections, are compiled annually by the County and are reported in
the Support Document.
A capacity analysis of the axisting major highway network was
performed using the methodologies identified above with the results
shown in Table 3 and on Map TR-2 (W & E).
Level of Service "D" has been established in this plan as the minimum
acceptable level of service standard for all County roads except the
following:
Airporl: Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway
Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road Santa Barbara Blvd
Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway
Goodlette-Frank Road US 41 Golden Gate Parkway
Pine Ridge Road Airport Road 1-75
The County has established LOS "E" as the minimum acceptable level of
service on these roads.
The existing LOS cf each segment was compared to the adopted
standard. The County Roads with unacceptable conditions are
identified tn Table 2.
In all cases, two additi6nal lanes are required to return the existing
system to an acceptable level of service. Since the County is
responsible for maintaining the adopted level of service in a manner
consistent with adopted policies, the additional lanes necessary to
return the County roads identified above to an acceptable LOS are '.
programmed in the Capital Improvement Element.
EXISTIN~ UNaCCEPTaBLE CONDITIONS ON COUNTY RO~DS
1992
CIE Daily 1992
f Roadway ge=aent ~ Volume LOS
31 Bonita Beach West of Vanderbilt 1.6 19,503 F
Road Drive
39 Airport Road Pine Ridge Road to 2.6 34,~75 F
Golden Gate Parkway
22 Logan Blvd. Pine Ridge Road to 1.0 13,419 E
Green Boulevard
Souroal Collier County Planning Department
S. Unacoeotable Conditions - 8ta~e Roads
For those portions of the S~ate highway system located outside the
City of Naples, this plan incorporates the level of service standards
found in the Florida Transportation Plan.
These standards applied to State roadways tn the unincorporated areas of
Collier County and are as follows:
Ex£st~nq Trans~tion£ng
Rural ~rea Urbanized area
I- 75 B c C
US- 41 C D C
~i? SR- 84 C D C
' SR-951 - D Ce .~.
· SR- 82 C - -
* This segment of roadway has been designated as a "backlogged
roadway" by the Florida Department of Transportation, April
1993. Reconstruction along this segment will be expedited by
FDOT.
The Existing Urbanized Areas and Transitioning Established Areas are
identified in Hap TR-IAWi The Statewide Minimum Acceptable Opera~ing
Level of Service S=andards for the S~ate Highway Systum are more
thoroughly explained in the Statewida Minimum Level of Service
Standards (Chapter 163.339,
Based upon the methodologies outlined above, the County has determined
that the State roads shown in Table 4 and on Map TR-2 (W & E) are
operating at or below the acceptable level of service.
TRA X-19
TABLE: 3
07-S4~93
Colfier County Transportation Planning Database Capacity Analysis
(Proposed 1994-98 CIE)
' 1992 Ex~Cm6
C~ed Ro~d L 1~
~x~t S~ ~ O~y LOS SE~ O ~td
III
1 CR31 Ai~ ~. ~dEq ~. Io VK~,~h. Rd. 40 A O ;1863fflA ~41t~ A 0,4S I
2 [5S C~31 Aif~ Rd. Vi~E~I ~h.Rd. Ext. 10 ~ fl~ge 40 8 O ~7733 lA 38~2~ 8 0.73
/
3 39 CR31 Aif~ ~. ~ ~ Rd. to G~efl G~ce P~fkw 40 .,A ~ i~,GTS 18 32r3~ F 1.07
4 CR31 Ai~o~ ~d. G~En G~e ~l~w~ ~ R~io Rd. 60 D O ~458S I A S5t3~ C 0.79
S ~3 CR31 A~ ~. -,,, R~G R~, Io O~s ~. 60 O ~ 31949 1A SGt3~ C 0.S7
6 3 C~31 Ai~ Rd. O~s ~. t0 US41 60 , 8 O Z5888 IA 57t4~ ~ A 0.45
7 54 I C~3 ~ E~90f~ ~ of SRSSI 2U L ~ SSg,~ 10 13,~ ~ 0.72
I 54 CRS~3 8~E~EO~. S, of Sfl~S1.. 2U . ~ ~ g594 IO 13,~ C~ 0.72
TO 3'1 ~tl ~h ~. Welt of Ve~e~t ~, 2U O O lt~3 18 I 17,~ F 1,15 [xielm~
12 33 C~fl~Ad. ,~I~.IoCRpH 2U L 0 '1021S IO 13~ C O.Te
I~ C~ ~n~ Ro~ 2t US41 lq C~ke9 I~ 2R ~ 0 0 IO 15,,8~ A 0.~
14 S~A4 D~ ~, US41 to AJ~ ~. 60 C O ~0533 1C 53r3~ 8 0.39
IS 48 SR84 D~e ~, AIr~ ~. ~,0 ~4w~ ~ 2U 8 O i8418 IC 20f~ C o.go
16~ et SR84 ~l~. ~dw~.toC~n~Bp~flfld. 2uI8 D 18418 1C 20,~ C 0.90 1994
17 SR84 O~li~, C~n~fnAd. loS~l~l~l~v 40 8 O 172SO IC 41r1~ B O.42~
18~ SRI4 O~s ~. Sm~ 6~9 ~. to CRgS1 2U ,.,A C 7068 IC 16r1~ 6 0.~
1~ 62 G~en G4t4 ~. C~9SI Io ~4~ ~. 2R K O 9454 ID 14~2~ I C 0.67 1~
20 CP~8~ G~en Ga~e ~ us41 fo Go~e~,~. 6D [ O T8520 lA ; S2~8~ C 0.35
21 S CR886 G~enG4tl ~.. G~lett~Ff~ ~.~A~. 4D A O 3S744 lA , 41r~ O 0.87 lggS
22 CRBSE G~ Glte ~_ ~ ~. to ~75 4D I A ~ 21910 1A 43~1~ A
23 CR8~6 G~efl G~I ~ ~75 lo ~ ~! ~- 40;A E 20694 1A 43:1~ A 0.48
24 C~ee G~G~e~ ,S~!~MiB~.~)SI 40 B O 12323 lA 38t2~ A 0.32
2~ CRISI Oo~et/~Fra~ ~. ~fl Ga~e P~w~ lo ~41 60 0 E 9979 lA ~,1~ C 0.~
~ Green ~. Senti ~lfl ~. Ie ~ ~ 2U L O O 10 13~4~ A
3J G~ls~e~. TllthA~:toV~e~l~hRd 2~[, L O 4863 IO 13;~ C 0.36
32 37 CRSSI ~de4 ~. to G~en G4Ce ~. 2R R O ~617 1D 15~8~ B 0,42
33; CR951 ~denG=;e~.toK~9eRd. 4R R ~ t~420 1D 40~?~ B 0.33
34 CR3SI ~ R~ge ~4.to G~en G~e Ps.wa 4R R O 15301 1D , ~7~ B 0.3~
.,35;61 CR951 G~nGsfeP~w~loO~s~. 4R R D 24532 10 4047~I ~
37 10 CR)S1 ~4Ifles~,.H~:IoUSel 2R ~ g ;53l 10 16~8~ OI 0.79
,,.~112 SRam1 I~eofCeP~Rd, uselIoMa~teE~. 40 e o 2~gez Ic 4a,~ 81
3~ ~2I SRgSI IsleofC~. Me~4tee~.loNewY~Ov. 40 O C 2~,992 1C 42f2~ B 0.S;
~ 51 S~S51 r.feorC~d~d. 'NewYo~kOr. toM~col~8(~ 2U AI ~, ~19e~ 1C 17,7~ D 1.24
41 SR951 IsleofC~Rd~ Md~ol~O~geloCRg53 4OO~ C 1~607 1C=43r2~ 8 O.41
.42 SRSS1 INe of C~ Rd. Cfi ~53 fo CR SZ, 4D A C 14~76 lC 43,2~ 8 0.34
.43 CRa46 I t ~[h Ay.N. GMfl~rp O;f to V~e~l O;~ 2U ~ 0 ~,230 ID 13~ C 0.54
44 I CR846 I I I Ih ~v,.N:, VaME¢~I 0¢. lo ~ 41 2U ~ ~ O 7363 TO 13,~ C O.SS
4S S cRa~e ~ee Rd. US41 Is ~fp~ ~. , 40 B O ~3030 IA 38~2~ A
4~ e c~a4e ~M~ ~. , ,, ~po~ ~. 1~7~ 40 B O I~S2~ IA 38,2~ A O.4~
47 I C~14e ~fe~. F?StoC,~e~I 2U ,,~ O 1~O78 lA I~,~ A 0.57
4a C~14~ ~64 ~. CK ~1 lo SR 2~ 2R ..R O , 6TM lO IS.S~ B O.4~ I
49 5R93 IntErState 76 8rowotd C~flty ~,1o SR 29 4F I B O 1C 33,~ A 0.~
51 SR93 Intefslo;o 75 CA 951 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4F H ,~_16615 1~ ,,47~?~ .~ ~.35
52 SR93 In(etsitle 76 ~,~M~ Rd. lo ~dee ~. 4P H ~ C 26955 IC I 47/7~ 0 0.57
S4J L~irraffo.dRd. w.s~ers~2s '"~u 'ti ~ 3724' t~' 13.~ C O.2~.1 .-
,o. 065--434 "
GT.Sq~93 (cont £nued)
Collier County Transportation Planning Database Capacity Analysis
(Proposed 1994-98 CIE)
.. C4x.mt e4 Reed t. 1~)~2 Yam'
~J~Je~ S~ ~T'~t D~'ly LOS ~ 0 V~SId ~e~ted
anl ~ P, oed · Uf~ Fre~/Te Reed lid V~Tib~ VMu~ · Rel~ Defter
I
S7 21 ~t~ h~ ~d St. to ~d~ ~. O L O O ' I0 O N NA
S8 S7 ~l~ Ro~ ~dfl ~. to V~eM ~h. ~. O L D 0 10 O N NA
41 S3 ~t~ Re~ G~efl G~e P~w~ ~,e R~ ~l 0 L D O 10 0 N NA
~ 2t C~8~ E~t~R~ ~4199N~t~, O L O O 10 O M NA
~3 H~ tfl Sl;ee~ Mdn St, le New M~ ~, 2U L 0 77~0 10 13,~ C 0.58
SS C~ Keds C~ I~ 19 ~dee ~ O R D O 1D O N NA
ee New ~-w Ro~ V~e~l ~f le ~ 41 O ~ O O 10 O N NA
~ CR8~ ~ge~. We~oIUS41 40 L O St08 10 2gr~ C O.31
70 14 ~196 ~. O~r~.te~St. 60 O D 37669: lA 56~3~ C 0.67
'7~ 94 CRa}6 ~. S~$Lle~. ED B D 34895 lA 57~ A O.61
72 14 ~6 ~. Gt~eS~N~Rd. HA NA NA HA NA NA N NA
73 41 ~96 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. to ~75 40 A E 10670 lA 43r1~, A O.71
74 CRIS6 ~ ~99 ~. ~75 1o ~51 40 A O 8685 lA I41r~ A 0.21
75 15 CR856 R~. ~.;o~W~ 40 L D ~4115 10 2~r~ C 0.48
76 15 CR856 R~. ~W~S~e~. 40 L O 10225 10 2~,~ C 0.35
77 16 CR~56 R~. S~e~.~SRI4 2U L D 6969 10 13~ C O.52
7~ 17 ~8~ R~fl~e~ ~~.~n~ 2U L O 9891 lO 13~ C 0.74 1999
It CRa~ R~e~e~. P~A~.toGRg51 2U L D 37~ ID 13~ C 0.28
12 $~e~e~. Gre~G~G~eP~w~ 4D ~ D 13757 1D 29~ C 0.47
~4 Se~e~eB~, R~o~,toSR84 40 L O 10353~ 10 29~ C' 0.35
IS 32 $~ ~e ~, SR84 to ~a~e~e ~ ~. O L D 0 10 O H NA
16 C~92 S~co~. E. of~ff~. 2UI L O 5~37 10 13~ C 0.3~
17 SR2I Stye ~o~ 2~ US41 to ~75 2R R C 0 1C ~7~ A 0.~
II SR2S S;Ke ~o~ 2~ ~75 t= CR ~A $~ 2R R C O IC ~7~ C O.~
8~ SR2~ S~ete Ro~ 2~ ' CR 2gA S~th to E~ of F~ I~ 40 C C 0 1C 29~9~ B O.~
~ SR2~ Stile Ro~ 2~ E~ of F~ liM 10 ~ 2SA No~h 2U A C 0 lC 131~ A 0.~
ll SR2~ Slsce Ro~ 2~ ~ 2SA N~ te SR 12 2R R C 0 1C 10,~ B 0.~
12 SR2~ I Stale Ro~ 2~ SR 12 lo He~ C~ ~ 2R R C 547g lC 9r~ B O.S8
~3 SR82 Slate Ro~ 12 SR 2~ to Lee C~n~ U~ 2R a C 0 lC ,,7~ B O.~
$7 47 ~41 T~T~[~ ~n~TtqR~e~T~. 40 C D 30772 IC 33~g~ D 0.~1 lees
ti 4E ~41 T~TrdE~ Ra~e~k.M. le~f~W 40 A 0 30439 1C S4~~ e O.SS
S9 US41 T~ Tr~ East ~ef~t W~ Rdr lo Ida el C~d 40 A O 19211 lC 54~4~ A O.3S
1~1 ~41 T~TrdE~I IdeotC~IoCR~ 2R R C 4~33 lC ~ 81 0.52
101 ~ ~4t T~ Ttd [a~ CR 12 lo SR 2t 2R R C 0 1C 9~ A 0.~
102 U~41 T~ T~ Eqql SR 29 qe D~e C~y ~ 2R R C O 1C ~4~ e O.~ ,
103 US41 Te~ Te~ N~h Lie Ce. ~ Ia ~ P~I ~. 40 IA D ~332S IC 40~9~ A 0.57
lOS 4S US41 T~ Ttd No~h ~dee ~.(o V~t ~h, Rd. 40 A ~ 128~S 1C 40~9~ A O.80 1
lOS 45 IUS41 T~ Tr~ North Ve~e~t ~h. ~. le G~ PMk Of. 40 A O 16435 1C 4Or9~ O 0,89 1
107 US41 T~ Tr~ floKh Gdf PI~ ~. Ia K~ ~ ~. 60 O O 11361 1C ' 58.~ C 0.71
IO8 44 US41 T~ T;~ No.h Gf~e S~fIf~ ~ ~ ~ ~. NA ,N~, NA NA NA N~ [~_ __N~__
110 ~541 T~ T~ No~h S~a~ Rd. lQ Cteech Rd. GO C O DiSC 1C 47,7~ D O.~
~ (continued)
Collier County Transportation Plann{ng Database Capacity Analysis
(Proposed 1994-98 CIE)
l~gZ
Cow.ed Road L 1~2 Y~
~.1 ~4~ T~TrM~ 4thAwtN. le'F~' 60 F O 312221 lC ~.1~ O'
~14~ 4~ C~I~ V~e~t~h~t GMf~te~41 2UI I D 11230 lB ~2.~ O 0.94
Ill ~3 C~t~ V~M~, ~411e~M. O L D O IO 0 N NA
'11S 43 GRill V~bq~T N~rle~?$ 2U ~ O 752~ 10 13,~ C O.$& 2~1
117 ~lez v~h~, k7~leCnpft ;~ L O 21et 1D 13.~ C
111 2~ CA~I V~WIDM ~e~h~.~Pe~lq 2U ~ O 61g2 ID 13(~ C 0.46
11{ 2~ ~1 V~~ ~p~e~.~tllthAw. 2U L O 57~1 10 13.~ C 0.43
120 26 W~. C~,~3~29 0 ~ O 0 I0 0 H 0.~
127 ~11 ~ P~ M. V~M~Ie~41 2U L O 3~1 ID 13~ C 0.30
122 31 IR~ $~ ~ ~l P~ ~e NA NA NANA NA NA N NA
123 27 ~ ~ NA NA NANA NA NA N ' NA
124~ ~ T(~e NA NA NANA NA NA N NA
~ 34 ~ ~ Ae~ NA' NA ~A NA NA NA N NA
[ 124~ ~ ~ NA NA NA HA NA ~ NA ~ N NA
1~ ~ ~ p~ NA NA NA NA NA NA N NA
I I I
(VI} (IX) T~BLE 4
EXISTING UI~ACCEPT~BLE CONDITIONS ON STATE ROADS
1992
CIE ' Length Daily 1992
~_ Roadway Segment Mi19~ ~olume LOS
51 Isle of Capri New York Drive =o 3.2' 21,992 D*
· Road Harco Island Bridge
4~ US 41 Airport Road to 1.7 38,500 F ..
Rattlesnake Hammock
Determined to be a backlogged, roadway
Souroes Collier County Planning Department
In the State's adopted 1994-98 Work Program~ construction funds are
programmed for portions of these segments, and several have funds
programmed for desig~ and r~ght-of-way acquisition. A copy of the
S~a=e's proposed 1994-98 Wor~ program ~s included i~ the Support
Docu~ento
D. ~ SYSTEM Nt-'~DS
1. Land Use Pro4eotions
The development of the Future Traffic Circulation Hap Series is based
upon estimated travel demand generated by projected ~a~d uses.
Increases in existing travel demands will occur wherever increased
growth occurs. Projecting where this land use activity will take
place ~s a process called land use forecasting or allocation.
.Land usa forecasting is based upon the premise that a certain amount
of development w~11 occur during the period under study. In Collier
cowry, this amount of development is based upon the University of
Florida population projections, and the resultant demand for housing,
employment, shopping, etc.
Given that a certain number of dwelling units will be constructed and
a certain amount of commercial development will take place to suppor~
"' ~t, the only th~ng left to determine ~s where those dwellings and
commercial areas will be located.
To that end, a computer model was developed to allocate growth
· (dwelling'units and employment) ~o the Naples Urban Area. Because
? lands outside the urban area were not permitted to exceed the I unit
';~ . per 5 acre maximum allowed under the WA" zoning d~sCrict, the computer
~:.' model was only qsed to allocate growth
addition, because of the relative size of the Immokalee Urban Area,
and the absence of readily ~vailable employment data, the computer
model was not used in the Immokalee Urban Area. Instead, manual
project,on techniques were used to predict the growth in various land
use categories in Immokalee.
In the Naples Urban Area, the results of the S~mplified Land Use
· Allocation Hods1 (SLAM) forecasts were used in two different studies
~ to produce travel demand estimates and projected corridor needs.
' TRA I-2S
" ,o. 065,, t437
2. Travel Demand Patterns
It can be expected that travel demand patterns may shift in years to
come as development takes place in the future. As an example, two
studies conducted for the Naples Metropolitan Planning Organization
concluded that traffic zones in the North Naples community would
experience the greatest increases in travel demand based upon
historical and current land development patterns. This can also be
seen by examining the land use records that show the North Naples
Community having 9,960 acres zoned in approved PUDs resulting in
29,790 dwelling units. In addition, over 689 acres of approved
co=mercia1 land is found within these PUDs, resulting .in a potential
for 5.5 million square feet of commercial area.
Utilizing land use information like this has permitted the County to
project the travel demand generated by future dwelling units (the
productions) and by the employment centers (the attractions). Travel
estimation techniques, both manual and computerized, reveal travel
movement patterns between traffic analysis zones on both the existing
and future highway networks.
Travel estimation techniques such as Ndistribution# and "assignment"
result in volumes of traffic on each link in the network. By testing
different alternatives, e.g., adding two new lanes to a specific
segment or by adding a new road, future traffic circulation patterns
can be developed.
The 1995 Naples Area Transportation Study (NATS) was adopted by the
Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in
March of 1985. This document and its supporting information are the
basis for the 1998 and 2003 Future Traffic Circulation Haps. Because
-the study horizon year did not match'the Future Traffic Circulation
Hap horizon years, further analysis was performed in order to
interpolate (or extend) the etudy results to the horizon years. This
was done manually utilizing the staff resources of the Planning and
Transportation Departments.
The 2015 Future Traffic-ways Map is intended to approximate the
Traffic-ways Plan adopted by the MPO. The 2010 Naples Area
Transportation Study (NATS) provides the technical support for the
2015 Future Traffic-ways Map and is included tn the Traffic
Circulation Element Support Document.
The 1998 Future Traffic Circulation Hap is based upon the Capital
Improvement Element and supporting data and analysis is included in
'the supporting data for that element.
3. Traffi~ Circulation Constraints
In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements
are constrained by the r,~tural features of the landscape such as the
Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the man-made
variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many
· . 5 ~lden O~te P~a~ ~lett~ ~, to ~ ~, 1,6 -. 4 ~,4 2 9,$ Add 2 ~m
,. 20 ~gS1 h~lem~ H~k ~ ~ U8 41 3,4 2 6,8 2 ~3,6 Add 2
. iX ~gsi ~avim ~ieva~ to ht~lem~ 3 2 6 2 12 Add 2
- 14 Pine RL~e ~d US 41 to ~ hd 2 4 I 2 ~2 Add 2
17 h~em~ ~k ~, VS 41 to ~lly A~nue 2 2 4 2 8 Add 2
22 ~ ~~ Pine ~dge hd to G~n BI~, I 2 2 2 4 Add 2
31 ~nita ka~ ~ V~erbLlt Dri~ to HLc~ ml~, 1,6 ~ 3,2 2 6,4 Add 2
~ 8 ~d 2
~ 33 ~unty B~ ~ Davis ~lev~ to ~ttlem~ 2 2 4 2
H~k ~d
~ 43 T~L ~ILX hit gavin BX~, to A~ hd 2,3 4 S,2 2 7,8 Add 2 ~el (3)
~ 4S T~l~i Trai~ ~h l~h~ hd to S. of ~flll ~ad 2.9 4 ll.S 2 17,4 ~d 2
S2 ntvt~mton ~d P~ Xid~ to ~~ 1,4 2 - 2 - Add 2 ~nel
S3 Livingston ~ ~lden Gate P~ay to ~dio ~d l,S 0 0 2 0 Ne~ 2 L~om
54 Bald Eagle Oriu go~h ~ ~th o~ Sa 9Sl 2,7 2 S,4 2 10,8 Add 2
to P~no ~d9e ~,
' ~', 60 Znviro~ntal ~tt~g - ..
Source~ ~lier ~nty Tr~s~rtatL~ ~r~n~
. Notes ~ Ch~ges ~ll~l~
(2) ~nn"~ct Los
(~) State ~J~tu Tha~ ~ Mo~ R~i~ To ~la In T~ CIE ~ ~~
E. NON-MOTORIZED
Today in Collier County, there exists the potential for an integrated
network of bicycle paths and sidewalks that would provide a safe,
clean, healthy, and efficient opportunity for travel throughout the
urban area.
Many of the major highways have bikeways and sidewalks incorporated
into their design. It is a polic~ of this plan that all future
capacity improvements described in this plan shall include provisions
for bikeways and/or sidewalks. In addition, the Subdivision Regulat-
ions of Collier County provide for the placement of sidewalks/
bikepathe either adjacent to the thoroughfare or as an integral part
of a pathway system throughout a development.
An ~nventory of existing bikeway/pedestr~an facilities has been
completed and an analysis is being conducted to determine the
condition of the system.
It is also a policy of this plan that requires the County to develop
and implement a 5 year Comprehensive Pathway Plan in cooperation with
the City of Naples, Everglades City and the Pathways Advisory
Committee.
Such a plan shall document the extent of the ex~stfng syste~, noting
network deficiencies such as missing segments or substandard design/
construction and conditions. The Plan shall also provide for the'
systematic completion of the network as well as documenting the need
for an on-going maintenance program.
The Plan should also include provisions to encourage the use and
promote safe bicycle and pedestrian practices of the Pathway System.
The Florida Department of Transportation will assist the County in
this phase of the Plan byprovidingtechnical assistance and in some
cases funds where available.
0nly by installing an adequate network coupled with an on-going
promotional program can the County provide an effective Pathway
program.
,o. 65 , 440
TRA 1-44
GOX.~ ~ ~ PT. ul~' ~OR# D~Y~LOP ~ OP~R~L~ X B~ ~F~ZCZE~ ~ COS~
~I~ ~R~TION BY~H ~T PROVIDES FOR BO~
MOTORIZE~ ~ NON-MO~ZE~ ~~ OF PEOPLE ~ G~DS
~e C~nty Will maintain the major roadway system (excluding State
highvay~) a~ an accep~ble ~el of Se~ce by ~mplemenC~ng
~mpr~ementi to the foll~ng roadvay~ that have bee~ ~den=~f~ed as
operating bel~ 1~el of
31 ~ni~ ~ach Road W. of Vanderb~lt Dr~ve
~9 Al~o~ Road P~ne R~dge Road Golden Ga~e Par~ay
22 ~an Boulevard P~me R~dge Road Green Boulevard
~e C~ty w~11 annually adopt a Seconda~ Road Impr~ement ~o~am
c~er~ng a per~ ,o less ~an f~ve CS} years, vhich shall ~nclude
~ole proJe~s needed to ~in~ ~e ne~ork at the adopted ~vel of
Se~ice
Pol~ ~.2~
~e County shall a~ua11y appropriate the funds ~n the ensuing f~scal
year to acc~odate those phases of proJe~s l~sted ~n the annual
el~en~ (first year) of the Seconda~ Road
Pol~ 1.3~
C~ty a~er~al and col~e~or roads shall be maintained aC ~vel of
Se~ce "D" or better on the bas~s of the peak season peak hour
~raff~c vol~e.
~el of Se~ice "E" or better shall be ~ntained on the foll~ing
desi~a~ed roadways.
Roa~av From
Ai~o~ Road ~ Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Par~ay
Golden Gate Par~ay Ai~o~ Road Santa Barbara Blvd
Go~letta-Frank Road Pine Ridge ~ad Golde~ Gate Par~ay
G~lette-Frank Road US 41 Golden Gate Par~ay
Pl~e Ridge Road Ai~o~ Road 1-75 ·
~vel of Se~ice "D" or better shall be maintained on all other
a~erial and oollec~or roads, h~er~ any se~ion of road may operate
at ~vel of Se~tce ~E" for a perl~ no~ to exceed two (2} fxscal
years fo11~ing ~e dete~inatio~ of ~el of Semite "E" tn order to
pr~ide ~e County wl~h time to restore ~vel of Se~ice ~D" by making
appropriate improvements.
To ensure that these adopted standards are maintained, a monitoring
pr~ram and ~mplementat~on strategy have been ide~tified in the
Implementation Strategy section of the Traffic Circulation Element and
are hereby referenced by this policy.
~ I-~1
OBJECTIVE 4 ~
The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of
pedestrians, motorized, and non-'motorized vehicles.
Crv} (v~} (~x} Policy 4.1:
The County shall prepare and adopt a S Year ComprehenSive 'Pathway
Plan in cooperation with the City of Naples, Everglades City and the
Pathway Advisory Committee by June 30, 1994.
Polic'y 4.2,
The County shall to the greatest e~cent possible, provide funds for
~he ~mplsmen~ation of the C~mprshenstve Pathway Plan.
PolicT 4.3t
The.County shall Include the Installation of sidewalks and/or bike
paths as paz~c of all roadway improvement projects Identified on the
Traffio Circulation ~ap.
The County shall provide for the safe movement of motorized vehicles
thrcugh i~plementation of its Subdivision Regulations and highway
design standards ordinances. "
TR~ Z-SS
i
" [)(IS'lINC TRAF"RC CIRCULATION MAP
~! UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS :
· . M~4P T~r-4W
· :; 5 Y~AR CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN'r
ELEMENT MAP
~C.~rt' CO.
' FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION M^P
. YEAR 1998
~"~ FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP - YEAR 1998
FACIUTY TYPE
, ' r'-'3_~7:.'~ ..... '1'-'-~,:~'~'~ .....
~'~" i"' '"1~
~:,~ .' '- ............ 1 f \
i.
"' ' F"UTURE: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP '/
YEAR 2003
GOLDEN GATE ~ K~STER PLaN
" Prepared for
~ '~ COLLIE~ COURT~
;;. eo, .D o, corm coxx:se om,J
:~ Adopted Y~bruar~ S, 1991
I~LboL ~ate ~e~ ~d~oe ~o.
,..
{~) ~t~ Y~ S, X~tX ~d~ce ~O. ~1-15
(V) , ~ended Deo~er~ 19~1 No ~en~entl ~de to thil El~ent
'(~) ~en~e~ ~ 19, 1992 ~~e No. 92-24
(~I) ~ende~ Xu~s~ 4, 1,,2 ~di~noe No. 92-50
(~IX) ~ended Feb~ l&, 1993 No ~en~ents ~de to this EXtent
(IX) ~end~ ~ 25, 19~3 OrdL~ce No. 92-24
T]%BLE OP CONTENTS
~' ~ Page
"e II. ~EHVZEN
A. Count~-Wl~e PlaRR~Rg
B. Golden Ca~ Planning
IIX. ~~TI~ B~I~
.~ A.' Coals, Ob~e~ives and Policies
B. ~nd U~e Desi~ation Des~tptton
1. Ur~n
2, E~tates
3. ~ral Settlenent
~ (IX} C. Conditional Uees
~p Page
1 ~lden ~a~e ~star Plan S~ud~ ~eas
2 ~lden Ca2e Par~y ~ofessional.~ffice 18
C~erctal
3 ~ban ~tx~ Use A~ivlty Center 21
~ 4 ~-951 C~ercial In-fill Designation 23
5 Golden Gate Estates Neigh~rho~ Cen~ers 25
6 ~ndall Boulevard Co~erctal District 27
"~ *'. ~opted Portions
.... 065
The ~olloving section describes the three land use designations sho¶e'n
on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. These designat[ons~
generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be
requested. However, these land uss designations do not guarantee that
a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the
Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Zoning
Ordinance or in special studies completed for the County.
URBAN DEBI~TION
Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general
portions of.Collier County: areas with the greatest residential
densities and areas in close proximity which have or are projected to
receive, future ~rban support facilities and services. It is intended
that Urban Designated areas accommodate the majority of population
growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them.
The boundaries of the Urban Designated areas have been established
based on several factors lncluding$ patterns of existing development,
patterns of approved but unbuilt development, natural resources, water
management, hurricane risk, existing and proposed public facilities as
well as population projections and the land melded to accommodate the
· The Urban Designation will also accommodate future non-residential
uses tmcluding ellential lervices as defined by the moat recently
adopted Collier County Land Development Code. Other permitted
non-residential land uses may include: parks, open space and
recreational use; water-depsndenC and water-related uses (see
Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Objective 11.1 and
.including the policies for siting criteria); .child care centers;
community facilities such as churches, cemeteries, schools, fire and
police stations; utility and communication facilities$ Support medical
facilities such as physician's offices, medical clinics, treatment,
research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies (as long as the
d~mtnant use Al medical related) may also be permitted provided they'
are located within 1/4 mile of existing or approved hospitals or
medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all
types of injuries and traumas (such as, but mot limited to, Marco
: Urgent Care and Golden Gate Urgent Care). Approval of such support
r' medical facilities may be granted concurrent with the approval of new
hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care
treatment~ for all types of injuries and traumas (such as, but not
limited to Marco Urgent Care and Golden Gate Urgent Care).
Stipulations to ensure that the construction of such support medical
~ facilities ars concurrent with hospitals or such medical centers shall
be determined a~ th~ time of zoning approval. In addition, certain
land uses are permitted unddr criteria.
This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and
commercial land uses including single-family, multi-family, duplex,
and mixed use (Planned Unit Development). Commercial land uses are
also permitted in this district.
,, 3. ~orl~gage Brokers;
!~;, 4. Profesaional Offices;
,~; 5. Financial institutions; .'
fi' 6. Sit down restaurants; and
7. Any other professional or commercial usa vhich is
comparable in nature vith the foregoing uses and vhich
the Community Development Administrator or his designee
determines to be compatible in this district.
B. Hlnimum project area shall be tvo (2) acres.
(IZ}C. Projects shall be encouraged in the form of a PUD (there
shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones
except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning
~ust be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area
unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing
zoning district consistent vith the Golden Gate Area Haster
Plan).
: D. Access points shall be limited to 1 per 450 feet commencing
at center line of Santa Barbara Boulevard.
:' E. Access to projects shall be provided exclusively via Golden
'~ Gate Parkway.
F. Projects sba1! ~ake provisions for shared parking arrange-
ments vith adjoining developments.
G. Projects shall provide deceleration and acceleration lanes.
Projects shall encourage pedestrian traffic by providing
sidsvalks. Adjacent projects shall coordinate location of
sidewalks.
., I. Buildings shall be aet back from Golden Gate Parkvay a
~... mtni~m of 40 feet.
~" J. Buildings shall:be set back from rear lot line a minimum of
25 feet.
Buildings shall have a~aximumhetght of tventy five
feet plus tan (10) feet for under building parking.
L. Each project shall be limited to one sign not to exceed 20
square fee~ and six (6) feet in height, No flashing or
mechanical signs shall be allowed. Signs shall be located at
a minimum of 15 feet from the right-of-way.
Project shall provide a 10 foot buffer between vehicular
right-of-way and required sidewalk.
"'(IX)A. Commercial uses shall be limited to uses including low
'~': intensity transitional commercial uses that are compati~le
," with both residential and commercial, convenience commercial
to provide for small scale shoppinq and personal needs, and
'- intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of
goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of
automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C-1, C-2,
or C-3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land
Development Code (Ordinance 91-~02), adopted October 30,
(IX)B. Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit
Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement
for PUD'rezones except for the requirement that all requests
for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square
feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an
existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Cate Area
Master Plan);
C. Projects within the in-fill area shall make provisions for
shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial
developments when applicable~
D. Driveways and c~rb clots for projects within the Commercial
In-fill area shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial
developments; and
E. Access to projects shall not be permitted from CR-951.
3. Co~uereial under C~iteria
~Within ~he Urban-Mixed Use Dis~ric~ certain in-fill commercial
development may be permitted. This shall only apply in areas already
substantially zcne~ or developed for such uses. The following
s~andards which limit the intensity of uses must be met:
(XX)a. The subject parcel must be bounded on Doth sides hy improved
commercial property or commercial zoning consistent with the
Colden Cate A~ea Future L~nd Use Element or commercial
property granted am exempt(om or compatibility exception as
provided for in the Zoning Re-evaluatiom Ordinance and should
not exceed 200 feeC im width, although the width may be
greater at the discretion of the Board of
Commissioners. Uses that meet the intent of the ¢-I/T
Commercial Professional/Transitional District are
required to be ~.unded on one side by improved commercial
property or consistent commercial zoning or commercial
property granted an exemption or compatibility exception as
provided in the ~oning Re-evaluation Ordinance.
(VX)b. The proposed u~e ~sC not generate in excess of five percent
o£ level o£ service C design capacity on abutting streets
that provide access to the project; and
c. The proposed use must not exceed a floor area of 25,000
square feet.
Doc. Ref~ 48IS/MA/GM
4. Xnterstate ~tivit~ Center
On the fringes of the Golden Gate Haster Plan boundaries there are
several percale that are located within the Interstate Activity Center
at 1-75 and Pine Ridge Road as detailed in the County-Wide Future Land
Use Element (FLUE). Parcels within this Activity Center are subject
to the County-Wide FLUE and not this Haster Plan. Appendix 9 of the
support document provides a detailed map of the Activity Center
boundaries.
2 · F~T~TEfl DESIGN~TIO]I
This designation is characterized by low density semi-rural
residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses.
Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal
non-conforming lots as small as 1.25 acres. Intensifying residential
density shall not be
The Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses
including~ essential eeL-vices aa defined in the Land Development
Code, and parks~ open ~pace and recreational usaa. These uses shall
be consistent with all of the noels, Objectives and Policies of the
Golden Gate Area Halter Plan including Objective 2.1 and Policies
a. Zst~tee-XJ~ed Use Deeig~ttion ..
X. Residential Zstates Subdietriot - single-family
reeidential development~aybe allowed within the Estates Hixed Use
Subdistrict at a ~aximum density of one unit per 2 1/4 gros~ acres
unless the lot is considered legally non-conforming.
2. Estatee ~eiqhborhood Centers - recognizing the need to
.provide basic goods and services to Estates residents, Neighborhood
.Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use
Map.
The locations are based on intersections oE ma~or roads and spacing
criteria (See Hap 5). The centers are designed to concentrate all new
commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can be readily
accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of
commercial development.
' ' With the exception of the node at CR-951 and Pine Ridge, all nodes are
20 acree in size. The node at CR-951 and Pine Ridge Road is 10 acres
and is located only on the west side o~ the intersection due to the
presence ~f a 50 foot canal and subsequent expansion of CR-951 which
will significantly reduce the amount of developable property directly
east of CR-951.
The develop~ent'cr[teria for the nodes are aa follows=
(IX)A. Commercial land uses shall be limited to uses including
intensity transitional co~mercial uses that are compatible with both
residential and commercial, convenience commercial to provide for
small scale shopping and personal needs, and intermediate commercial
to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that
have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be
'{ZX)3. ~andall Boulevar4 C~erciel Dietrich - recogniz~nq the
unite develo~en~ patte~ and chara~er~stics og su~oundinq
Uses~ ~e ~ndall ~ulevard Cmercial District has ~en designated on
~t ~lden Gate ~ea ~ture ~nd Use ~p. Also see ~ap 6.
~e d~el~ent ~ter[a for ~e d~str~ are as follows=
A. ~oJec= shall ~ enc~raged ~n the fo~ of a P~.
B. C~erc~al uses shall ~ l~m~t~ to the fo11~ng:
Aut~ob~le Se~cI
2.Ba~r and ~auty ~op~.
~ild Car~ Cent,rs.
4.Con~,nienc, S~orez.
5.~g S~or,s.
9. POSt Off~ces and profession1 off,cee.
10. Repair ~s- ~dlo, ~, ~11 appliances, ~oes~ and
Res~an~ ~nclud~ng fast f~ res~an~ ~=
~ve-~n
12. Veter~na~ Cl~cs - no ~ts[de kenneling.
C. ~oJects shall ~de ad,ate ~ffer~g fr~
areas.
D.~oJe~s shall ~e ~sions for shared parking
.a~ang~ents w~ adjoining develo~ents.
X. 8ettl~ent ~ea DAstriot
Consists of Se~ons ~3, 14~ 23 and 24, T~shtp 4$ South, ~nge 27
~st (the fo~e~ N0~ Co1~9n Gate Su~v~sion), which was zoned and
platted ~tween 1967 a~ 1970. In settlement of a lawsuit
to ~e ~tted uses of ~[s pro~y, ~ ~o~e~y has
"ve~ted" for ~e usel ~pec~ft~ In that ce~ain "~" ~ Settlement
zoning ~anted ~ the Co~ty as referenced ~n that certain S~~T
~D ZONING AG~ dated ~e 27th day of Janua~,
By designation ~ the Gr~h ~a~agement Plan and the Golden Cate Area
Master Plan as Settlemen~ ~ea, the Plan rec~nized the property as an
arsa which is outside of the Urban Designation and which is currqntly
far removed from supportive services and facilities, Expansion of the
Settlement Area in terms of additional lands or dwelling units, shall
be discouraged. Its existence will have no precedential value or
effect so far as Justifying simila= uses on surrounding or adjacent
property. The Settlement Area Land Use District is limited to the
area described above and shall not be available a~ e land use district
for any other property in the County.
The uses per~itted lncludet
1. Agricultural uses and related
and a maximu~ numbs= of 2,I00 dwelling
3. Neighborhood commercial uses and hotel, motel and transient
i' lodg~n~ facilities, no= to exceed 22 acres in
4. Golf courses, parks, playgrounds, and other similar
recreation and open space uses;
5. Community facilities, ~ruch as a fairgrounds site,"
agricultural extension station, fare and police stations;
6. Educational facil~t~es, religious facilities, gover~ental
act£vit~ee and child care center,
7. Earth~ining; and
8. E~sential services al defined by the most recent Collier
COUnty Zoning Ordinance.
All An accordance with the ZONING AND DEVELOPHENT DOCUMENT for the
property as approved by the County.
~, CO]IDITI0]O~ USES (~X)
Various types.of conditio~al uses are permitted in residential zoning
districts within the study area. In order to control tho location and
spacing of new conditional uses, the follo~i~g shall apply to requests
for condit~onal uses;
{IX)z. Essential Services Conditional Uses which are defined as
electros or gas generating plants, effluent tanks, major
re-pump stations, sewage treatment plants,
percolatio~ponde, hospitals, hospices, water aeration or
treatment pla~te, governmental facil~ties ~n residential
areas, public water supply acquisition withdrawal, or
extractioq fac£11tiee, safety service fa¢llit~es, and other
similar facilities shall be allowed anywhere within the
Estates Zoning Distr~c~. Except that Essential Services
provided w~thin the Southern Golden Gate Estates shall be
consistent with Goal 2,
GOLDEN GA~
FUTURE :LAND
COLLIER COU~Y,...
AMENDED JULY
CO~L~ER COUNTY
P.O. ~X 3~4
B~T; ~DA 3499S
S~ Date ~ended O~d~n~oe
(I1 ~ended
(~l) ~ende~ ~ '~990 ~o ~en~ent~ ~de to th~s
.:~, (XXX) ~ended
(~) ~ed F~ S, XgOX O=d~n~ce ~o. oX-XS "
(V) ~ended
(~) ~ended ~y ~9, ~002 Ord~n~ce No. 92-34
(~) ~ended Au~s~ 4; ~992 O=d~n~ce No. 92-50
'. · '(~X) Wnded ~ 2S; 3993 Ord~n~ce ~o. 93-24
Doc. Re~: 4799/~/~
so. 065,, 457
There ts one Future Neighborhood Center identified along Carson Road
(the east, west alignment). If and when the area begins to contain
the uses intended for the district (school~, parks, churches, etc.),
it shall aUtomatically become a Neighborhood Center and at that time
become eligible for commercia! zoning requests. The I~aster Plan will
be amended to incorporate the new neighborhood center. The s~acing
requirement for commercial zoning in relation to schools is % mile.
3. Commerce Center - Mixed Use District
The purpose'of this designation is to create a major activity center
that services the entire Immokalee Urban Designated Area and surround-
ing agricultural area. The Mixed-Use District shall function as an
employment center and shall encourage commercial and institutional
center, governmental institutions, middle or high school, community
park and other employment generating uses. Other permitted commercial
uses shall include transient lodging facilities.
In considering new commercial zoning, priority shall be given to
protecting existing residential uses.
Residential development is permitted within the mixed-use
at a maximum density of twelve (12} units per gross acre. Residential
dwellings shall be limited to multi-family structures and less
intensive units such as single-family and duplexes provided they are
compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be
permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as
defined in the County's Zoning Ordinance.
The mixed-use district will be contr01~ed via s series of performance
standards that address issues of buffering, noise, signage, lighting,
architectural compatibility, lot size, parking and landscaping.
Non-commeroial Uses
In addition to those mixed-uses permitted within this subdistrict uses
such as parks, open space and ~ublicly-ow~ed recreational uses,
churches, libraries, cemeteries, ~ubllc and private schools, day-care
centers and those essential services as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance are permitted.
This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of industrial
land uses such as Commerce Center - Industrial and Industrial.
(IX) 1. Z~duetrial
The purpose of this designation is to provide industrial type uses
including those uses related to light manufacturing, processing,
storage and warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, packing houses,
recycling, high technology, laboratories, assembly, storage, computer
and data processing, business services, limited commercial such as
child care centers, and restaurants and other b~sic tndustri~! uses
but not. including retail, as described l~ the La~d Oevelopmen= Code
for the Industrial and Business Park Zoning Oistrict~. Accessory uses
and structures customarily associated with the usus permitted in this
- 37 -
Doo. Ref$ 4799/HA/GH
district, including offices, retail sales, and structures which are
customarily accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to
permitted principal uses and structures are also permitted. Business
Parks are intended to include a mix of industrial uses and offices
designed in an attractive park-like environment with low structural
density where building coverage ranges between 25% to 45%, and large
landscaped areas for both the functional use of buffering and
enjoyment by the employees of the park. Mowever, to reserve land
within the industrially designated areas for the intended industrial
uses, and to ensure compatibility, Business Parks shall be permitted
to develop with a maximum of 40% commercial uses. Access to arterial
road systems shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access
Management Policy and consistent with Objective 7 and Policy 7.1 of
the Traffic Circulation Element. Commercial uses shall include uses
such as offices,'financial institutions, cultural facilities and
fitness centers/facilities, and shall only be permitted within those
areas zoned Business Park or Planned UniC Development within the Urban
Industrial District Land Use Designation, Business Parks must De a
minimum of 35 acres in size. No residential facilities shall be
permitted in the district except for housing of security guards,
watchmen or caretakers whose work requires residence on the premises.
The Planned Unit Development and/or rezoning ordinance document for
Business Park projects shall contain specific language regarding the
permitted non-industrial uses and development characteristic
guidelines consistent with those stated above. Business P~rks shall
also be required to meet the compatibility standards as stated under
the Interstate Activity Center Designation for commercial and
industrial land uses.
2. Commerce Canter - Industrial District
The purpose of this desig~ation is to c~eate a major Activity Center
.that se~es the entire Immokalee Urban Designated A~ea and surrounding
ag~icultural area. The Industrial District shall function as an
employment center and shall encourage industrial and com~ercial uses
ae deac~ibed in the Land Development Cods for the Commercial,
Industrial and Business Park Zoning Districts. Higher intensity
commercial uses including packing houses, industrial fabrication
operation and warehouses shal! be permitted within this District.
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses
permitted in this district, including offices, retail sales, and
structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental and
subordinate to permitted principal uses and structures ars also
permitted. Business Parks are intended to include a mix of industrial
uses and'offices designed in an attractive park-like environment with
lo~ structural density where building coverage rang~ between 25% to
45%, and large landscaped areas for both functional use for buffering
and enjoyment by the employees of the park. However, to reserve land
within the industrially designated areas for the intended industrial
uses and to ensure co~patibllity, Business Parks shall be permitted to
develop with a maximum of 40% co~u~ercial uses. Access to arterial
road systems shall be in accordance with the ¢olliei County Access
Management Policy and consistent with Objective 7 and Policy ?.1 of
the T~affic Circulation Element. Co~ercial uses shall include uses
such as offices, financial institutions, cultural facilities and ·
,= 065,, 459
~itness centers/facilities, and shall only be permitted within those
~,~,. areas toned Business Park or Planned Unit Development within the Urban
Industrial District Land Use Designation. Business Parks must be a
minimum of 35 acres in size. No residential facilities shall be'
permitted in the district except for housing of security guards,
watchmen or caretakers whose work requires residence on the premises.
The Planned Unit Development documen~ and/or rezoning ordinance for
Business Park projects shall contain specific language regarding the
permitted non-industrial uses and development characteristic
guidelines consistent with those stated above. Business Parks shall
also be required to meet the compatibility standards as stated under
the Future Land Use Element Interstate Activity Center Designation for
commercial and industrial land uses.
Non-Industrial Uses
In addition to thole industrial uses permitted within this district,
uses such as those essential services as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance are permitted.
Special Provisions
T e. Proximit~ to Neighborhood Center and Commerce
., center - ~L~ed Use
If 50% or more of a proJec~c is within a Neighborhood Center and/or
Commerce Center-Mixed Use, then the maximum density allowed within the
Neighborhood Center or Commerce Center-Mixed Use of twelve (12) units
per acre can be averaged in with the density of the portion ~f the
project outside of the Neighborhood Center for the entire p[oJect~
however, appropriate buffering to adjacent lower intensity uses must
achieved.
b. ~ffor~able Housing
'Provision of Affordable Housing as defined in the Housing Element
would add eight (8) dwelling units per q ross acre above the maximum
density of the district~ however, no density may exceed sixteen (16)
units per acre. This bonus maybe applied to an entire project or
portions of a project provided that the project is located within
Neighborhood Center (NC), Commerce Center (CC-MU), and all residential
districts.
o. Residential In-fill
To encourage residential in-fill, three (3} residential dwelling units
er gross acre may be added if the project Il ten (I0) acres or less
n size. : The following conditions must be met= the. project must be
compatible with surroundi~g land uses~ the property in question has no
common site development plan with adjoining property$ there is no
common ownership with any adjacent parcels~ and the parcel ~n question
was not created, to'take advantage of the in-fill residential density.
If the project has direct access to two (2) or ~ore arterial or
collector roads or if there is project com~itm~nt for provision of
interconnection of roads ~ith existing or future adjacent projects,
one (1) residential d~ellinq unit per gross acre ~ay be.added above
the maximu~ density of the district.
STATE O1~ I~ORIDA ~ .
COUNT~ O~ COLLIER )
Z, D~ZGHT E. BRO~, Clerk o~ Courts in and fo~ the
~'f ~ent~e~h 3udtc.lal Clr~lt, Col~le~ County,
here~ ce=tJfy that the foregoing
~:~ Ordinance No. 94-22
' the 12th day of Aprt2, 2994, during Re~2ar Session.
;. Co~ Co~ls. lonere of Collie=
~'~.~ ~ ...
C2e~k of C~rtn and C2e=~-~.~ . .. ' .
Ex-o~fXcto to Boa=d of ~'.
*;':.'~ ~ Deputy Clerk ~' /*~ "
'- * ~0~