Ordinance 97-62 ORDINANCE NO. 97- 6._~2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 89-05, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROVVTH MANAGEMENT
PLAN. FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY.~
" FLORIDA; BY AMENDING AND INCORPORATING THE EXISTING
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION. MASS TRANSIT. AND AVIATION "'
ELEMENTS INTO A NEW ELEMENT TO BE KNOWN AS THE
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; BY PROVIDING FOR z, ~-' F"'
SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth
Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has held public headngs to provide for and encourage Ix.'bi:
participation throughout the 1996-97 plan amendment process; and
WHEREAS, Collier County did submit the 1996-97 Growth Management Plan Amendmerits
to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on Apdl 29. 1997; and
WHEREAS. the Department of Community Affairs did review and make wallten objections to
Transportation Element/Traffic Circu~'~tion Sub-Element Amendments to the Growlh Management
Plan and transmitted the same in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has 120 days from receipt of the wdtten objections from the
Department of Community Affairs to adopt. adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed
Transportation Element Amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and
WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the
manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the
Transportation Element Amendments to the Growth Management Plan on October 28, 1997; and
WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requiremerits of law have been met;
and
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that:
.,S. EC_T. LQbLOJ::f.: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN.
This Ordinance as described herein, shall be known as the Transportation Element
Amendments to the Growth Management Plan for Collier County, Flodda. The Collier County
Growth Management Plan Transportation Element Amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
~[C_~Oj:{J3~LQ: SEVERABILITY.
If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion.
1
~7,~Oj:LTJ:JJ~EE: EFFECTIVE DATE.
The effective date of this Amendmenl to the Transportation Element shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the
Element in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, DD/~la~l~tte~, whichever occurs
eadier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this Element
may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is
issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by
adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status. a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to
the Department of Community Affairs. Bureau of Local Planning. 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3~
Floor, Tallahassee. Florida 32399-2100.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County
hI ,:,2~'r~
t's day of October, 1997.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK 2: ~/:::~UNTY. FLORIDA
/ '
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED'ASTO FORMAND T~,s ordir'.nnt:.e F;!:~' with
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 5ecrefo~.' ~ SI:.I'~:'s: ,'!~-.'
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY ~~.~~
1997 Transportation Element
2
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth
Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the
foregoing is a true copy of:
uRDINANCE NO. 97-62
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 28th day
of October, 1997, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 5th day of November,
1997.
Clerk of Courts and C
By: /S/S san Bar~e~i' -,' ..'~
Deputy Cle~ ' ~' ..",~'
COLLIER COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
TRAN SPO RTATI O N ELEMENT
COLLIER COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TP~F,c!C C!RCUL~,TIO,~,~ SUB-E~EME4~
Prepared for
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
October, 1997
AMENDMENT~ TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
TP~.cF!C C!RCUL~T!O.~,* ELEMEN-T-TRAN SPORTATION ELEMENT
Symbol Date Amended Ordinance No.
*INDICATES ADOPTED PORTIONS
NOTE: THE SUPPORT DOCUMENT WILL BE UPDATED AS CURRENT INFORMATION BECOMES
AVAILABLE.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
A. PURPOSE TRAN-6
B, SYSTEM OVERVIEW TRAN-7
C, EXISTING SYSTEM (198-796) TRAN-8 1. Road Inventory
2. Levels of Service
3, Traffic Count & Accident Frequency Data
4. Unacceptable Conditions - County Roads
5. Unacceptable Conditions - State Roads
D. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS* TRAN-43
1. Land Use Projections *
2. Travel Demand Pattems*
3. Traffic Circulation Constraints*
4. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2000*
5. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2010'
6. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2020*
E, NON MOTOR2ED TP, AVFL INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION* TRAN-76
1. Non-motodzed Travel*
2. Aviation*
3. Transit*
F. PERSPECTIVES* TRAN-83
1. Land Use Issues*
2. Marco Island Airport Impacts*
3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation*
4. Funding of Roadway Improvements *
G. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY * TRAN-85
H, GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES* TRAN-88
*INDICATES ADOPTED PORTION
LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES
TABLE PAGE
1A Collier County Generalized Service Volumes Two-Way TRAN-25
Annual Average Daily Service Volumes for Urban
Two-Way Artedals
1B Collier County Route-Specific Service Volumes TRAN-27
Two-Way Annual Average Daily Service Volumes for
Urbanized Artedes Operating under Special
Conditions
1C Daily Service Volumes for State Roads in Collier TRAN-28
County prepared by FDOT, July 28, 1992
1D FDOT's Annual Average Da:'5' Volumes for Non-State TRAN-30
Roadways, Multiple and Two Lane Uninterrupted
Artedals
2 Existing Unacceptable Conditions on County Roads TRAN-34
3 Existing Unacceptable Conditions on State Roads TRAN-35
4 Collier County Transportation Planning Database TRAN-36
Capacity Analysis
5 Collier County Major Highway Network Future * TRAN-47
Traffic Circulation Improvements - 1997-2001
LIST OF MAPS
MAP
TR-1AW Existing Facility Type- Western Collier County · TRAN-9
TR-1AE Existing Facility Type- Eastern Collier County * TRAN-10
TR-1BW Existing Number of Lanes- Western Collier County * TRA- 11
TR-1BE Existing Number of Lanes- Eastern Collier County * TRAN-12
TR-1CW Existing Adopted Level of Sen/ice Standards - Western Collier County * TRAN-13
TR-1CE Exjsting Adopted Level of Se~ce Standards - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-14
TR-1DW Existinq Levels of Service - Western Collier County* TRAN-15
LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES
(continued)
MAP PAGE
TR-1DE Existinq Levels of Service - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-16
TR-1E Existinq Evacuation Routes* TRAN-17
4~iTR-1F-1 Existin.q Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Naples Urban Area* TRAN-18
TR-1F-2 Existin.q Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Ever.qlades City Area* TRAN-19
TR-1F-3 Existing Bicycle and Pedestnan Facilities - Immokalee Area* TRAN-2n
TR-1F-4 Existin.q Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Marco Island Area* TRAN-21
TR-1F-5 Existinq Bicycle and Pedestnan Facilities - Rural Area* TRAN-22
TR-2W Existing Unacceptable Conditions - Western Collier County * TRAN-41
TR-2E Existing Unacceptable Conditions - Eastern Collier County' TRAN--42
TR-3 Traffic Circulation Constraints - Western Collier County' TRAN-45
TR-4W 5 Year Capital Improvement Element Map Western Collier County * TRAN-48
TR-4E 5 Year Capital Improvement Element Map Eastern Collier County * TRAN-49
TR-5AW Number of Lanes- Year 2000 Western Collier County * TRAN-50
TR.-SAE Number of Lanes - Year 2000 Eastern Collier County * TRAN-51
TR-SBW Facility Type - Year 2000 -Westem Collier County* TRAN-,52
TR-5BE Facility Type - Year 2000 - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-53
TR-5CW Levels of Service - Year 2000 - Western Collier County* TRAN-54
TR-.5CE Levels of Service - Year 2000 - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-55
TR-5D Evacuation Routes - Year 2000' TRAN-56
TR-.6AW Number of Lanes - Year 2010 Western Collier County * TRAN-57
LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES
(continued)
MAP PAGE
TR-6AE Number of Lanes - Year 2010' TRAN-58
Eastern Collier County
TR-6BW Facility Type - Year 2010 Western Collier County* TRAN-59
eTR-6BE Facility Type - Year 2010 - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-60
TR-6CW Levels of Service - Year 2010 Western Collier County* TRAN-61
TR-6CE Levels of Service - Year 2010 Eastern Collier County* TRAN-62
TR-6D Evacuation Routes* TRAN-63
TR-7AW Number of Lanes - Year 2020 - Western Collier County* TRAN-64
TR-7AE Number of Lanes - Year 2020 - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-65
TR-7BW Facility Type - Year 2020 - Western Collier County* TRAN-66
TR-7BE Facility Type - Year 2020 - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-67
TR-7CW Levels of Service - Year 2020 - Western Collier County* TRAN--68
TR-7CE Levels of Service - Year 2020 - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-69
TR-7D Evacuation Routes* TRAN-70
TR- 7E-1 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Naples Urban Area* TRAN- 71
TR-7E-2 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Everglades City Area* TRAN-72
TR- 7E-3 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Fadlities - Immokalee Area* TRAN-73
TR- 7E-4 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Marco Island Area* TRAN-74
TR- 7E-5 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Rural Area* TRAN-75
TR-8W Future Transit Demand Centers &Transit Corridors - TRAN-81
Western Collier County Future Mass Transit Map*
TR-BE Transit Demand Centers & Transit Corridors - Eastern Collier County* TRAN-82
D. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS
1. Land Use Projections
The development of the Future Traffic Circulation Map Series is based upon estimated travel demand
generated by projected land uses. Increases in existing travel demands will occur wherever increased
growth occurs. Projecting where this land use activity will take place ~s a process called land use
forecasting or allocation.
Future land use projections began with future population projections. The Long Range Planning
Department relies on the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) for estimates of
population growth rates into the future.
i~having chosen the appropriate growth rate for use in population forecasting. land use data sets for
tee horizon years were prepared that were consistent with the population totals predicted to exist in
those horizon years. using the aforementioned growth rate. These data sets were prepared using a
collection of assumptions about how much of the development still possible within each traffic analysis
zone will have occurred by the horizon year. The method of distributing the countywide population total
predicted to exist (and the resultant amount of commercial activity) among the traffic analysis zones
was approved by the MPO at their Januar,/26, 1996 meeting. A full description of the method is
included in the support document.
2. Travel Demand Patterns
The land use data sets referred to above are the chief inputs into the transportation model used to
predict future traffic volumes. The model used by the Collier County MPO. and its consultant, is the
Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS). This incorporates Urban Analysis
Group's TRANPLAN model with a user interface. FSUTMS is supported by the Florida Department of
Transportation.
The MPO's general services consultant. David Plummer and Associates, prepared the most recent
Long Range Plan Update, which was adopted by the MPO in December, 1995. Subsequent to the
adoption of that Plan, the projected population in the year 2020 was revised downward. The
Financially Feasible network for that year was re-examined with the new population projection, and
was not altered. Interim year networks were also produced, for the years 2000 and 2010.
The land use data sets that produced the trips involved were created with the method mentioned
above. The number of trips on the network varies only with the number of dwelling units predicted to
be on the ground in the horizon year. Trips originate from residential land uses. and are destined for
commercial land uses. The routes chosen by the simulated trip makers are those that minimize travel
times. When different network configurations are tested, improving a facility. or adding a new facility,
can shift trips onto those facilities, because the new or improved facility has become part of the
quickest route for some trip makers.
The networks produced for each of the three horizon years were judged to be the best solutions
purchasable with the revenues projected to be available, and are thus called financially feasible
networks. The network plots published in the final report of the Long Range Plan Update (June. 1996)
are included in this element unaltered, and are used as the Number of Lanes maps for the western part
of the county.
3. Traffic Circulation Constraints
In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural
features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the
TRAN -43
man-made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport, In many instances approved
developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of logical extensions of urban collector
and arterial roads.
Map TR-3 depicts many of the traffic circulation constraints identified during the alternatives
development phase of this plan.
The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay northward
under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41) to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system.
The characteristics of the highway network at this location resembles an "hour-glass", On the western
lextreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge, while
to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result is the typical "bottleneck" effect when
too much volume is forced through a constructed area.
The other contributing factor to current and future congestion problems is associated with the
northwest/southeast configuration of the East Trail (US 41). Because this roadway converges with the
east/west and north/south roadways at a ', angle it has the impact of forcing or "squeezing" the travel
demand into the confined area of the Gordon River corridor. This one roadway serves both the
north/south and the east/west travel demand in the East Naples area.
Travelers at the southeastern corner of the Urban Area have only one route into the central City of
Naples, i.e., the East Trail, whereas travelers in the northeast reaches of the Urban Area have a
multitude of choices along the roadway grid for a route to downtown Naples.
In developing plans for new and expanded roadways that make up the long range network. the County
has kept in view these natural and man-made traffic circulation constraints. Even though
environmental concerns are usually addressed through the permitting process. it is important to
consider various highway alternatives in light of the sometimes fragile ecological features.
TRAN -44
MAP TR-3
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION CONSTRAINTS
WESTERN COLLIER COUNTY
CCXJ,/EZR ~NTY. FL0i~IDA
[] .........
[] -,--,-----,,-,---..- -:.:-:.:-:.:-:-:: ~
4. Future Traffic Circulation Map - Year 2000
The roadways included in Table 5 are funded in the proposed 1997-2001 Capital Improvement
Element.
Map TR-4 (W & E) identifies the projects included in the CIE. Map Series TR-5 is similar to the
Existing Traffic Circulation Map Series as it depicts the lane requirements and facility type and
evacuation routes in the year 2000. Map TR-5AW, the Number of Lanes map for the year 2000, is
reproduced unaltered from the Long Range Plan Update, and is the financially feasible network for that
year.
5. Future Traffic Circulation Map - Year 2010
OThe second of three planning horizons found in this Element is the year 2010. Map Series TR-6
depicts the lane requirements, 9,,"~d facility type and evacuation routes in the year 2010. Map TR-6AW,
the Number of Lanes map for the year 2010, is reproduced unaltered from the Long Range Plan
Update, and is the financially feasible network for that year..
Map TR-6 (W and E) depicts the roadway needs in the year 2010 based upon the travel demand
modeling done during the preparation of the Long Range Plan Update.
It is the purpose of this map to provide the basis for adding projects to the 5 Year Capital Improvement
Element (CIE) during the annual update process. Each year, as time advances, projects will move
closer to the annual element (first year) of the 5 year CIE.
6. Future Traffic Circulation Map - Year 2020
The third of the three planning horizons found in this Element is the year 2020. Map Series TR-7
depicts the lane requirements, 3rid facility type, evacuation routes, and pathway facilities in the year
2020. Map 'I'R-7AW, the Number of Lanes map for the year 2020, is reproduced unaltered from the
Long Range Plan Update, and is the financially feasible network for that year.
The Future Traffic Circulation Maps (2000, 2010, and 2020) depict the number of lanes for each
facility, and facility type. Since the State's Functional Classification System is based upon a series of
actual data tests, it is inappropriate to speculate as to how a facility may be functionally classified in
five or ten years. Therefore, this Element presumes that the roadways shown on the Future Traffic
Circulation Maps (2000, 2010. 2020) are of the same facility type as exist currently (Map 1A). Any new
facilities added during these time frames are to be construed as collectors unless otherwise noted in
this element.
TRAN -46
(TABLE V)
Apprt,vrd by Iht. Be ;(': Novt.mbrr i 2. 1996
Collier County Transportation Planning Database
Tentative FY 97 to FY 0l Capital hnprovement Plan
55 62031 Airport Rd. Vandcrbil! Bch. Rd Ext to Pine Rifl,ue Convcrl 4 laflc to 6 lane
54 62041 Bald Ea~,le Dr. S. of SR951 Convert 2 lane to 3 lane
31 60021 Bonita Beach Rd. West of Vandcrbilt Dr. Convert 2 lane to 4 lane
33 {~0101 County Barn Rd. Davis Blvd. lo CR 864 :Convert 4 lane to 6 lane
.62 63041 Golden Gate Blvd. CR951 to Wilson BIvd Convcrl 2 lane lo 4 lane
: 65 60134 Goodlette-Frank Rd. Carica Rd. lo Pine Ridge Rd. Convert 2 lane to 4 lane
8 69101 immokalec Rd. 1-75 to CR 951 Convert 2 lane Io 4 lane
:. t 57 62061 Livin6ston Road Immokalee Rd. to Vandcrbilt Bch. Rd. Construct ;i new 4 lane road.
. , 58 62071 Livinl~slon .R.oad Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. lo Pine Rid~.c Rd. Construcl a new 4._l?nc road.
52 : 60071 L.ivinF, ston Road Pine Ridge Rd lo Wyndcmcrc Constn,cl a nc,.,,' 4 lane road
' 53 60061 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway lo Radio Rd. Constn,ct a new 4 lane road.
41 60111 ~PineRid[leRd. :Airport Rd lo l-75 Convcrt41aneto61anc
56 62081 Sanla Ba~oara Blvd. Golden Gate Parkv.'av to Radio Rd. Convert 4 lane to 6 lane
'- .. 23 67021 Vanderbilt Bca_ch Rd. US41 to Airport Rd. ]Construct a new 4 lane road. ~..
Backup calculations CIP insert Page 1 12/19/96 11 :.50 AM
MAP 11~-4W
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT MAP
WESTERN COLUER COUNTY
LEE CO. :~
COLL:E~' CO. '~'
S.R. 84 - 75
': :,:: .: :'.
'~7..
~ --,_,"". .:; '...;;: ..... . .
+ . ,-~ -,., :-~ ....~ · . .
C~UE~ COUN~. rLO~OA ' , -' " ".'~j;' :'.' ':'~' '' ' · '~"
~ ~ ' . .&'~,..'~::~:..'~' .. -
~ :::' " :,'J ' ' :;' "F ':;~,~';~2-~,..~"" .;' .:"
,, e .,-::-~..:--.;:.::::~:.;:.~..-..-
~.. : , ~ "~,~ . ;':'.~.;:. ~-' ':~',~L .-- ....~~,
~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~- ", %,- 5' F ,-~' ~ i..'.. ~
.. .. :~:., ~-~'. -;. ,. ,
HENORY CO. MAP TR-4E
ccx.u~.co 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT MAP
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY .,
C, OLLI[R CO~,N,'~t. ;LOq'
!~ ::::::;:
HENDRY CO. ,t~
COLLIER CO. ~
'; :' ' ' MONROE CO.
MAP TR-bAW ::~
Number of Lanes ~
Year 2000 "'..,y ~o.
Western Collier County ~""~, , :<~
'~'~l ~.~~L ......... ,=~ ........ =i..._ ............ ,=,~ ..... ~._~
F~RIDA DOT - D[~[~ ONE CO~ER COUN~ {NTERIM Y~R-Z060 la)
NAPES {COWER CO~) ~PO ~NG-~NGE P~N UPDATE FINANCIA~Y-FfAS{B~ P~N
-E",IDRY CO
3OLLIER CO. I~AP TR-SAE
NUMBER OF LANES
YEAR 2000
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
COLUER COUNTY.
~ENORY CO.
COLLIER CO.
CCXJJER CO.
MAP TR-SBW
FACILITY TYPE - YEAR 2000
W!~ST~RN COLLIER COUNTY
HENDRY CO, -.
r '- -=-,':, ,-~ ...... '~oTUc;'c'0.' "'
|
.......... J
C~UER CO.
3---i
/
~--...~ ~
' " ' ' .V,.:'t~ ' "" '
~, . -,: . .o,'; ~ ,-
.
-- ~ -.~ ..; ·
. - . ;- ..r ,,.j. ' - · .
~ ~ , ~ -:' -,,
HENDRY
COLLIER CO. MAP TR-,SBE
FACILITY TYPE- YEAR 2000
EASTERN COLUER COUNTY
COUJER COUNTY. F"LOR~DA
HENDRY CO.
COUJER CO.
'.' COLLI.-----------------D~ CO,
· MONROE CO. !i,C~
O~lt: ft/N hug: mtt~.e~m~
-:
MAP T~-SCW:
YEAR 2000 LEVELS OF SERVICE :,:~
WESTERN COLLIER COUNT')'
HENDRY CO. "
COLLIER CO.
LEE CO.
~ C~. ~A
CU(r C~
HENDRY CO.
....... MAP TR-SCE
COLLIER CO.
YEAR 2000 LEVELS OF SERVICE
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
cOuJ[R COUN'P,$. rtO~lOA
~_ .................. 72",~,c,o,_ .................
,~ ......................................... _c._~.F',,._Co_.._._~
~" ~ , UONROI~ CO. "
MAP TR-5D
Evacuation Routes
Year 2000
i
I
I
MAP TR-6AW
Number of Lanes
Year 2010 .........
Western Collier County ~,,~'~'
+ ']
'~'~'.'.,~ ~~""~ ...... ':~~ ........ ~'--~.--~ .......... .~ ..... *,"
FLORtDA DOT - DI~Rt~ ONE
COLLIER COUNTY iNTERIk{ YEAR.20X0'
LONG-RANGE P~N UPDATE FINANCZA~Y-F~SZB~
NAPES (CO~ER COUP) MPO
~ENDRY CO. MAP 'TnR-BAE
cou,,ER co. NUMBER OF LANES - YEAR 2010
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
COLUF. R COUNTY, FLORIDA
!
HENDRY CO.
COLLIER CO.
:" COUJER CO,
· " MONROE CO.
MAP TR-6BW
t FACILITY TYPE - YEAR 2010
WESTERN COLLIER COUNTY
HENDRY
F' ""-'~... I C(:X.LJER
'1
F ...........
,, ',
,, ',,,
',
r" ..................... c_%._.y ......... '
LEE CO, ,
COLLIER CO
,,,
'~'~ i:,,,'-'--~
/
, ,.: /..
' */'-:.-.: ., ;, .
· -.~ . ~
COLI. JER COUNTY. lrt,OR10A ~ ~ · '
-- ~-- .
,, . ~.,: .;. :,:.. .. . . . :...
,I:=a.U:C 4 "~' m ' ' .
~, '< .-,...~., ~ ' ,.- ....
........ ' '.
HENDRY CO MAP TR-6BE
COLLrER CC
FACILITY TYPE - YEAR 2010
EASTERN COLUER COUNTY
CO~LJER COUNt're'. r'm. ORtO,m,
-ENDRY CO.
COLUE~R C0
MAP TR-6CW
YEAR 2010 LEVELS OF SERVICE
WEST[RN COLLIER COUNTY
HENDRY CO,"
.............. ~oCu~ <~o7 .....
J
................... ~,.~,.~,,~
~E CO.
. :: ,, ......
o
HENDRY CO, MAP TR-6CE
COUJER CO,
YEAR 2010 LEVELS OF SERVICE
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LID) ~
HENDRY CO.
L .......................................
C~ER CO.
-,~.~-
MAP TR-6D ~"':
Evacuation Routes
Year 2010
cousin
~C)O!~ldi:l(O(l) TR,/dcTiC C, OIIl'ltOI.
;
bIAP TR-7AW
Number of Lanes
Year 2020
Western Collier County ........... ' ......
...... FR
~ '1
"Z~Z:~,'--i ~ ~ ~ '.M~-- ........ ~ ........ ~ .............. ~.;._ ....
BIll , ~
fLORIDA DOT - Di~I~ ON[ -
COLDER COUNt' EXHIBIT
NAPES (CO~ER COUNt) ~PO LONG-RANGE PUN UPDATE 20ZO FINANCIA~-F~ASIB~ P~N
H~HWAY N~WORX
HENDRY CO. MAP TR-7AE
COLUER CO. !
NUMBER OF LANES - YEAR 2020
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
c, ,,, __ COLU'F'R COUNTY. FLORIDA
HENDRY CO.
COLLJER
· *-'- COLLIER CO.
MONRO~ CO.
MAP TR-7BW
FACILITY TYPE - YEAR 2020
W~S'ITRN COLUFR COUNTY
~ENDRY CO. ·
F ~-'--.. ', COLUER CO.
I i
I "' "'
'1
LEE CO. ', · '
., i ~ .,
,,~,~ .,, ..,
,
~ENDRY CO. MAP I'~-7BE
co~L,E~ cO FACILITY TYPE - YEAR 2020
EASTERN COllJER COUNT)'
-,. ,., COLUER' COUNTY, FLORTOA
COLUER CO.
COLLIER CO.
MONROE CO.
MAP T~-7CW
YEAR 2020 LEVELS OF SERVICE
WESTERN COLLIER COUNTY
MENDRY CO.
i' ' ~" ' ' ~O[UER CO.
..,~.,~
X,~ LEE
~ ~u.~ _;___~ .......
HENDRY CO.
........ MAP ll~-TC[
COLIJER CO.
"'EAR 2020 LEVELS OF SERVICE
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
COJJER COUNTY.
MAP TR-7D
Evacuation Routes
Year 2020
TR-7E- l
'-,' 2020 NAPLES URBAN ARFA
· -' SIGNIFICANT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
~ ! _..
H ...... ·
~ . ,, $.,. ~, ,
. . ~ .. ~ .--
~ ~ --.
..1
2020 SIGNIFICANT MARCO ISLAND
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
~O:~O SIgNiFICANT RURAL AR~A
t'
BICYCLE FACILITIES :',~.. ~j.-.
Collier Countg
, '~ .~ ....
....
I '"" ~-~
' ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ '~;' -%' ·
E. NON MOTOR!ZED TRAVEL INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION
1. Non-Motorized Travel
Today in Collier County. there exists the potential for an integrated network of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities that would provide a safe, clean, healthy, and efficient opportunity for travel throughout the
urban area. To help create a more balanced and livable transportation system. one that provides for
bicycling and walking, Collier County has undedaken new roles and responsibilities not previously
performed.
The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. developed by the Naples (Collier County)
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the MPO in December. 1994. The
purpose of the Pathway Plan is to plan for the future needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and other non-
l~e:~torized travel modes, The Plan is a tool to guide the MPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Program within six
sential areas: (1) establishment: (2) engineering: (3) education: (4) enforcement: (5) encouragement:
and (6) economics. These interrelated areas address Collier County's non-motorized issues,
constrains, needs and opportunities The Pathway Plan is currently being implemented in Collier
County.
The Pathway Plan documents the extent "'f the existing pathway system. Many of the major highways
have sidewalks incorporated into their design. It is a policy of this plan that all future capacity
improvements described in this plan shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. In
addition, the Subdivision Regulations of Collier County provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities
throughout a development+
The Pathway Plan also provides for Ihe systematic completion of an integrated system by the year
2020. It is a policy of this Plan that Collier County will annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program
that establishes pathway priorities. The County. to the greatest extent possible. will identify state and
federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program.
In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, the County will encourage their use, and
promote safe bicycle and pedestrian practices through the continued support and implementation of
the Comprehensive Pathway Plan.
2. Aviation
In Auqust of 1996, by the direction of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and under
the direction of the Collier County Airport Authority, Coffman Associates, Inc. and Dufresne-Henry, Inc.
were retained as consultants to complete separate Airport Master Plans for the Immokalee Reqional
Airport, Ever.qlades Airpark, and the Marco Island Executive Airport. These plans provide insiqht as to
existinq facilities and conditions and make recommendations reqardinq potential opportunities and
necessary future facilities at the three airports.
a. Existing Facilities
The development of separate master plans for Immokalee Reqional Airport, Ever.qlades Airpark, a.n.d.
Marco Island Executive Airport required the collection and evaluation of information relative to each of
the airports and surroundinq areas includinq the followinq:
· Physical inventories and descriptions of facilities and serwces currently provided _.by each of the
al_Eports
· Backqround information pertainin.q to aircraft fleet m~x and historical activity levels
· Reqional plans and studies potentially affectin.q future airport development activity
TRAN -76
Immokalee Reqional Airport: The airpod is located on a 1,100 acre site in the north-central part of
the County, approximately 40 miles northeast of Naples. Located on the northeast side of Immokalee,
the airport is only one mile from the Central Business District. Primary access to the airport is via State
Route 29 to County Route 846, which intersects with Airpark Boulevard to the south of the airport. Little
development has occurred at the airport since its transfer of ownership in 1960 from the United States
Government.
Both landside and airside facilities are located at the airport. Landside facilities include the aircraft
storage han.qars, fueling facilities, etc. Airside facilities included at Immoka~ee are three runways, each
5,000 feet long and 150 feet wide. Taxiways are available as well. The airside facilities presently
available provide for opportunities that are not available at other fieneral aviation airports within the
County. The three 5,000 foot runways and pavement strenqth provide operational capability exceeded
only by Naples Municipal Airport. Additionally, only a portion of the 1,100 acres at the Immokalee
RegiOnal Airport is currently being used for airfield purposes. Lar.qe tracts of land remain available for
future development of additional landside facilities and future economic development activity.
Everglades Airpark: Everglades Airpark was initially purchased and developed by Collier County in
1968. The airport purchase was funded throuqh monetary assistance provided by the Federal Aviation
Administration, a National Park Grant, a~ :j Collier County. Little development has taken place since its
openin.q, other than the required maintenance projects. Situated outside the boundaries of Everqlades
National Park and the Biq Cypress National Preserve. the airport is surrounded on three sides by
water. The airport is immediately surrounded by lands zoned as areas of environmental concern.
Facilities at Everqlades Airpark include a sinqle runway that is 50 feet wide and 2,400 feet Ionq, a
taxiway, and runway li.qhtin.q. Parking facilities, fueling and hanqar facilities are also available. A
terminal buildinq/pilots Iounqe has been recently constructed, which provides a number of services.
Marco Island Executive Airport: In the late 1960's, plans for a resort oriented area south of Naples
were conceived. Deltona, the developer of the Marco Shores project, determined that along with the
upscale resort area, an airport was needed capable of accommodatinq small air carrier and general
aviation aircraft. Construction of the airport began in 1972, and was completed in 1976. Throuqh a land
swap with the State of Florida, the County recently acquired the airport property in exchanqe for
property within the Fakahatchee Strand.
Existing airfield facilities include one runway which is 5,000 feet lonq and 100 feet wide, a taxiway,
various naviqational aids as well as airfield li.qhtin.q. Automobile parkin.q facilities are available adjacent
to the terminal buildinq.
b. Future Potential Opportunities
Immokalee Reqional Airport: Accordin.q to the Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan, a number of
factors support the notion that this airpod could become a reqional airline / aircraft maintenance base
in the future, The lenqth, width, and pavement strenqth of the existin.q airfield is capable of
accommodatinq nearly all of the aircraft in the national reqional airline fleet. There is ample open land
available for future development of additional hanqar space.
The establishment of the airport in coniunction with the Southwest Florida International Airport as a
Foreiqn Trade Zone (FTZ) could provide some opportunities for expanded air carqo operations, The
Immokalee Reqional Airport can offer space for industrial development and warehousinq takinfi
advantaqe of the FTZ Such services could involve turbo-prop, business jet, or even smaller
commercial jet activity.
TRAN -77
Additionally, the shippin.q of fresh produce from the airport may be a possibility. Considerinq the larqe
agricultural base in the lmmokalee area, specialty produce opportunities could be developed for
movement by air to restaurants and retailers within the reqion, or nationally.
The reqional climate may offer an incentive as well for future fiiqht traininq facilities. The weather in
Southwest Florida is ideal for traininq operations. The airport has the land area available on site to
support this type of operation and development of the necessary hangar and terminal facilities,
Everglades Airpark: Land and environmental constraints at the Everfilades Airpark provide little in
the way of increased operations. The general intent of the Everfilades Airpark Master Plan is demand-
based rather than time-based. This means that reasonable levels of activity potential that are derived
'rom this forecasting. effort will be related to ~ levels rather than dates in time. The demand
eveIs, combined with airfield limitations suqgest that the Airpark will continue to serve primarily sinqle
engine and twin-enqine piston aircraft.
The waters surroundinq Everglades Airpark are currently utilized by seaplanes. The waters
surroundinq the Airpark provide a unique oppodunity to increase seaplane operations. by providing
daily sight-seeing flights and overniqht excursions to coastal areas with campg. round facilities.
Marco Island Executive Airpod: Accordinq to the Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plan,
Collier County Airport Authority should continue its efforts on operatinfi the airpod as an attractive,
efficient, and safe facility. It was recommended that the Airport Authority continue to market and
develop the airport as a facility to serve primarily corporate type aircraft indicative of the visitor and
resident clientele of the Marco Island Area, and attract and maintain scheduled commuter service for
the community.
c. Estimated Development Timelines And Costs
The development timelines and costs are included in the Master Plans for each of the airports. These
Master Plans will be incorporated into the new Transportation Element to be adopted in January 1998.
The short term planninq horizon covers items of hiqhest priority as well as items that should be
developed as the airport approaches the short term activity milestones. Priority items include
improvements to safety and pavement maintenance. Also included, are improvements to facilities that
are inadequate for present demand, Because of their priority, those items will need to be incorporated
into County, State, and FAA programming.
VVhen short term horizon activity levels are reached. it will then be time to program for the intermediate
term based upon the next activity milestones. Similarly, when the intermediate term milestones are
reached, it will then be time to program for the Ionq range. The cost estimates within each of the airport
master plans were increased by 30% in order to allow for engineerinq and other continqencies that
may be experienced by the project.
3. Mass Transit
a. Purpose
Collier County currently has no publicly sponsored fixed route bus system,
Private services offered in the County are fixed route "trolleys" which operate durinq the winter season
in Naples and on Marco Island, and a network of para-transit providers that offer transportation
services to the disadvantaged. Also, a scheduled airport shuttle service is offered between Marco and
Naples and between Naples and the Southwest Florida Reqional Airport~
TRAN -78
The Transportation Disadvantaqed (TD) pro.qram is coordinated by Tri-County Senior Services which
has been desiqnated as the Coordinated Provider by the Naples Metropolitan Planninq Organization
(MPO). The TD services are provided by various social service agencies and offer home pick-up and
deliven¢ transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaqed in the County.
The "trolley" systems mentioned above are run primarily for the tourist seqment of the population and
have fixed routes that visit the maior shopping, beach and hotel interest points.
No data exists as to the demand for mass transit services. Further, no analysis of existinq mass transit
levels of service and systems needs can be provided. Only an overview of projected mass transit
'stems needs is.provided here based u.g_pon the future land use map.
Neither the Florida Department of Transportation's 5 Year Work Proqram nor the MPO's adopted plan
identify the capability for a mass transit system, air. hough it is recoqnized that certain State and Federal
grant funds are available and are typically proqrammed in the State's 5 Year Work Proqram and the
MPO's 5 Year Transportation Improvement Proqram (TIP).
Althouqh there can probably be demonstr,..,ed a need for an urban mass transit system in a County of
this size, historically and even present day, the trend towards the ever increasinq need for local
subsidy of a transit system has kept Collier County away from implementinq a system.
b. Future System Needs
The development of an urban mass transit system in the future will depend on the increase in demand
and the ability of local qovernment to assume some of the financial responsibility of operatin.q an
effective system.
Even in the event that a private transit company desires to beqin service in this area, it is almost
certain that in order to obtain the Federal and State .qrants, a local match would be required.
Further complicatinq the start-up of a system is the dependency issue which immediately places a
burden on the County to continue to operate the system (even at a loss) because people will become
dependent on the availability of the system. It would be increasinqly more difficult to cut back on
certain routes after the population of a service area has bequn to rely on the service.
In the event that the County decides to embark on a publicly owned transit system. a transit
development plan will be developed. Such a plan will outline the proposed system, equipment needs.
routes to be followed, and the costs associated with both lhe start-up and the continued operation and
maintenance of the system. This plan will provide an analysis of future mass transit levels of service
and system needs and will be based upon the future land use map, future population and
socioeconomic characteristics.
Such a plan will have a complete review before the public and shall be found consistent with the
Naples (Collier County} MPO's plans. This plan will. at the time of public hearinq and input. determine
the appropriate level of service standard that will then be adopted as part of this element.
As a prelude to such a plan. the County has developed a map that depicts the maior transit influence
areas both from a production and attraction viewpoint. This is only a basis examination of the areas
that mi.qht be served by a transit system in the future.
TRAN -79 '.~
No attempt has been made to develop or show on the Future Transit Map any mass transit service
areas, terminals or transit rights-of-ways. What has been depicted on Maps TR-8W and TR-8E are
what could be major transit corridors serving current and future production and attraction areas.
TRAN -.80
u ~ r
f'LI I'IJI?E MASS rP, AIxlSIT MAP
;[-:,',,~',SII' DELtAI'.JD CENTERS &: T~..-'.r,lSl] CORRIDORS
'.",'ESlr. Rtl COLL;ER COUMT¢ ~ENDR'r CO.
'~j~/,.~_..~.~,4 C~L*[~ CO,
,
/
, I~--~
F. PERSPECTIVES
i. Land Use Issues
The Tr3ffic Circu!3ticn E!emcnt Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use
Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and
expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied. in fact, that changes or
shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for
this reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g.. DRI, rezone, and
provisional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is
prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities.
As an alternative to this pattern of demand driving the transportation system improvements. the County
das begun to explore ways to have the roadway system guide the patterns and densities of
evelopment. The County can determine the type of roadway system it wishes to maintain at the
adopted level of service and then take steps to permit the type of land uses that will be consistent with
that system. In this way, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for transpodation
services from outstripping the supply of the roadway system.
The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a projects ingress
and egress from the major roadway syste, .',. Inadequate control of access points, median openings
and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just
as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control
the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the
Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No. 92-42), and existing road and land use
conditions. An access management plan map exists for each mixed-use activity center. The purpose
of the access management plans is to minimize the adverse impacts to safety. capacity and operating
conditions of the roadways, while providing adequate access to those properties. Access points on
state controlled roads are subject to approval by the Florida Department of Transportation.
2. Marco Island Airport Impacts
The Marco Island Airport, located east of SR-951 approximately 4.5 miles south of US 41 is a facility
having a runway length of approximately 5.000 feet. Access to the facility is from SR-951 via Mainsail
Drive. The facility currently provides only general aviation services to the southern urban area.
Adjacent to the air strip is the Marco Shores Golf Club Community consisting of a golf course and a
phase one residential area of 240 condominium units. All other lands surrounding the facility are under
State ownership and are environmentally sensitive.
Peak season-peak hour traffic counts taken in 1988 at the intersection of Mainsail Drive at SR-951
reveal 120 vehicles using Mainsail Drive during the period of 8:00a.m. and 10:00a.m. This count would
include both residential and airport generated traffic.
A 1985 analysis of Marco Island Airport operation is part of the Continuing Florida Aviation System
Plan indicates the following current conditions:
In 1994, Marco Island Airport had approximately 30 based aircraft with 15,000 annual general aviation
operations. By 2005. the facility is expected to have 35 based aircraft and 21,000 annual operations.
The airport has been served by regional airlines in the past. If commercial commuter service was ever
resumed it could be expected to generate an additional 8,000 operations per year by 2005. The
current limited use of this publicly owned facility places no significant impact on SR-951.
TRAN -.83
3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation
In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different
agencies. Long-range planning is the primary charge of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO is made up of local elected officials and is charged by
Federal and State laws to coordinate the transportation planning activities for Collier County. The
Collier County Planning Department provides staff services to the MPO. The MPO coordinates its
planning activities with the City, County, and State Department of Transportation.
The programming and construction activities are handled by the City of Napies, Collier County. and the
Florida Department of Transportation. Each agency's construction programs are monitored by the
MPO to ensure inter-agency consistency.
4. Funding of Roadway Improvements
In Collier County the pursuit of additional funding for roadway improvements has led to the
implementation of numerous funding alternatives. The County has adopted a five cent local option gas
tax in addition to a one cent voted gas tax.
Impact fees for roadway construction were initiated in 1985 and up-dated in 1992. Municipal Service
Taxing Units have been used to implemer,, area specific projects.
On the State level, local governments through the Metropolitan Planning Organization have directed
their attention to the under-funded State roads in Collier County. One of the MPO's roles is to ensure
that local governments in its jurisdiction receive equitable treatment within the FDOT District.
TRAN -84
G. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
As part of the Tm~c Circ'JL'..tien E!ement Transportation Element, the County established minimum
acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For most County facilities, the
level of service standard to be maintained is "D" as measured on a peak season peak hour basis.
Several County and State facilities have been given a minimum LOS "E" standard. In addition, those
roads for which LOS "D" is to be maintained are permitted to operate at LOS "E" for a period not to
exceed 2 years. The reasons for adopting a "time frame" standard were to:
1. Adopt the highest level of service realistically possible and
2. To provide the practical methodology for implementing the standard,
l ln general, it is the County's intention to have future roadway improvement projects "production ready"
when they fall below LOS "D". That is. the design and R.O.W. acquisition steps of the road improve-
ment process will be substantially complete by the time a roadway improvement is needed. This
procedure then gives the County the two year period (during which time the road operates at LOS "E")
to actually do the construction of the improvement. Without this two year LOS "E" period, the County
would be forced to adopt a moratorium v".~ile the construction takes place or, as the alternative,
construct the improvement while the road is still operating at an acceptable level of service.
In addition to providing a construction period, the two years affords the oppodunity for another facility
to come on line that has a positive effect (as in the case of a new parallel facility) on the level of service
of the road operating at LOS "E". In this case, no improvement to the LOS "E" road was even needed
since a new road increased the corridor capacity and took some of the burden off of the LOS "E'"
roadway.
On State maintained facilities, the County and the State have agreed to the level of service standards
described in the element.
It is the purpose of this section to set out the strategy for implementing the level of service standards
policy of the Tr3~c C!rcu!3ticn E!ement Transportation Element.
It is this plan's intent to improve all roadways operating under unacceptable conditions within the first
three years of the 5 Year CIE and State Work Program, as per Policy 1.5.3 of the Capital Improvement
Element.
1. Monitoring
Section 3.15 of the Land Development Code is also known as the Collier County Adequate Public
Facilities Ordinance (APFO). It describes the annual count program done on County roads to
determine their annual average daily traffic (AADT). It describes how the relationship between that
AADT and the segment's adopted level of service (LOS) standard determines the road segment's level
of service.
The current levels of service at which road segments are operating are reported annually in the Annual
Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This report indicates which segments are operating at levels of
service worse than their adopted standard LOS. It also contains predictions of when certain segments
will reach levels of service that exceed their adopted standard LOS. Although traffic volumes are
expressed as AADT, LOS calculations are done to ensure adequate levels of service during peak
season, peak hour traffic conditions.
TRAN -85
The APFO includes the definition of deficient and potentially deficient road segments. and the definition
of an area or significant influence (ASI). The APFO describes the implications to the issuance of
development orders within an area of significant influence that contains a deficient road segment.
2. LOS Determination And BCC Findings
The current level of service determination (for County roads) are made as soon as the previous years
traffic count data is examined and verified by the Transpodation Depadment,
The annual average daily volumes will be calculated and the peak hour volume interpreted based upon
the available data, The Transportation Department shall prepare a list of all roadway segments, for
which a level of service standard has been adopted, that shows the current LOS (as determined
!hove) as well as the adopted LOS standard found in this plan. This list is part of the AUIR.
Following the preparation of the roadway list, if the volume of traffic of any segments are found to
exceed their adopted LOS, a report of the Depadment's findings concerning all of the County's
roads will be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners. The APFO describes the
consequences of a road segment operating at a LOS that exceeds its adopted LOS standard.
Building permits issued prior to the action oy the Board to enact a moratorium shall be held vested so
long as they remain otherwise valid.
3. Areas Of Significant Influence
The APFO describes the process of delineating areas of significant influence. The purpose in
delineating areas of significant influence is to clearly define which areas are impacting a roadway found
to have a substandard level of service and further, are subject to moratorium.
While it is probably true that a specific land use in one part of the County has some potential for
impacting a road fifteen miles away in another part of the County, it is more reasonable to expect that
most of the significant impacts on any given roadway segment will come from the land uses located
closer to it.
The County will therefore develop a network of "envelopes" that surround major road segments. It
should be noted that in some cases, several links (part of the network between two intersections) can
be added together to form a continuous segment. This is done because in some cases. any impact on
one link in the segment would generally affect all links in the segment.
Some influence areas may be found to overlap other influence areas. This is to be expected since in
many cases a given land use affects more than one roadway,
Another factor in determining the scope of an influence area will be the roadway facility type or
functional classification. Basically, the four types of facilities are freeways/expressways, principle
arterials, minor arterials and collectors. A fifth type of roadway, local streets, are not part of the major
highway network and therefore not included in this element.
Based upon a facilities function, it can be assumed that a principle arterial exerts a greater scope of
service than a minor arterial or a collector. And likewise, a minor arterial exerts a greater scope than a
collector. As such, the arterials will generally have a greater area of significant influence than the
collectors. The APFO contains guidelines on determining the scope of the ASI by facility type.
The size and patterns of the influence areas will be developed following an examination of traffic
movement patterns and the relative attractiveness of one facility versus another. It can be generally
TRAN -86
assumed that the majority of the impact from adjacent land uses would affect the nearest link, although
where two links are near equidistant from the land use area, an overlapping of influence areas may
occur, The Transportation Department will identify these influence areas on a map and transmit them
to the Board of County Commissioners for review,
T~N~7
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND
NON-MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER
COUNTY.
OBJECTIVE 1:
The County will maintain the major roadway system (excluding State highways) at an acceptable Level
of Service by implementing improvements to the following roadways that have been identified as
eoperating below level of service "D".
CIE
fie Roadway From T_.9o
31 Bonita Beach Road W. of Vanderbilt Drive
Policy 1.1:
The County will annually adopt an Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR)~
, D ...... COvering a period no less than five (5) years, which shall include those projects
,,,,p,,w,v,,,~,,, · ,w~,~',,
needed to maintain the network at the adopted Level of Service standard.
Policy 1.2:
The County shall annually appropriate the funds in the ensuing fiscal year to accommodate those
phases of projects listed in the first year of the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). All
programming decisions are based on the AUIR, and annually incorporated in the Schedule of Capital
Improvements in the CIE.
Policy 1.3:
County arterial and collector roads shall be maintained at Level of Service "D" or better on the basis of
the peak season peak hour traffic volume.
Level of Service "E" or better shall be maintained on the following designated roadways.
Roadway From T_.9o
Airport-Pulling Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway
Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road Santa Barbara Blvd.
Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway
Goodlette-Frank Road US 41 Golden Gate Parkway
Pine Ridge Road Airport-Pulling Road 1-75
The County has declared as "constrained" the following segments:
Roadway From !9o
Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Gulfshere Dr. U.S. 41
Level of Service "D" or better shall be maintained on all other arterial and collector roads, however, any
section of road may operate at Level of Service "E" for a period not to exceed two (2) fiscal years
TRAN -88
following the determination of Level of Service "E" in order to provide the County with time to restore
Level of Service "D" by making appropriate improvements.
,v ~,,~,~ ..,~..,.~v~ .~p,,.,v~ ~,~.,~..~ .,~ .,.~,,....,.~, ~ ...v~,,.~ .... :::1
r:,~rate"" h .... ~,^^,, ;,~,,,.,,;r,,,~ !n ,h^ ~.~.~ .... ~"';"" Sirate"" coolion -'~
~! .,~-~ ~ ....... ,..,~ .,.~ ....H,~.,.~,.,~, .... ~! ..... ~ ......~ ~,,~..,,~ ........ ~,..
"""' +" "' .... ~';"" oh3r3~orictic~
I'r,'~Ffi..- th ,riP, t,, P,n,~b n~.riArl~, l*h,,'~n Ai*k~,r~, Tt-.,;r. if, ,~, ,A i~ H~, · i,~ .....
p ....
.... t..,~ ....~ .~..~.,v~ .....~, ~1...~,~ ,~.~.~ ~, ~ ..... ~ ...... r..~,. ~ .....,~,,~, . ........
.... ~' ~" '~--"~.7 ."~ ~'~'~" .'~"-'. ~,.~.,~ .... ~,--~',, -. .....~ .~
ics,Jes.
· ,,,~,,,~, ,~v~ ,~ ~ ~,,~ ...... ~ ~2 ""~ ~'~l ""' ~ "'~' ~' ~f~"~"'~ '~ '~ ~' "~ ~"'~"~'
i-n,/threu'-h ....... ;"'~"' "!s """* UROC.'T',.,,,"R, OP. {"" ,r,'p,d cc,,"'fi,,',',",,,,',J'nit!oc ,,t.,;~.....+;,.,,.,
"'~,~--~ ,~ "-~ -',," .~1'~,~' '~'~'~ ~' ~"~"~ .... '~"'~'~ ~"'~'~""~ "'"7 ~ t'''~'~'" "' ~"~"'
This will be done by more accurately identifyinfi the traffic volumes that correspond to the different LOS
thresholds on county roads, and more accurately quantifying the peaking characteristics of traffic on
county roads. The first component of this is to update the LOS tables in the Transportation Element to
best reflect current conditions on county roads. The second component is to beqin installing, as funds
permit, permanent traffic count stations, to better identify the peaking characteristics of traffic on county
roads. The third component will be to amend the Capital Improvements Element to implement
findinqs.
Policy 1.4:
For the purpose of regulating development orders, Collier County has adopted the following level of
service standards for state maintained roads:
Existing Transitioning
Rural Area Urbanized Area Urbanized Area
I- 75 B C _C
US- 41 C D* D
SR- 84 C D D
SR-951 - D D* ~
SR- 29 C - ~
SR- 82 C -
TRAN -89
It should be noted that FDOT has different LOS standards for state roads, The Naples (Collier County)
Metropolitan Planning Organization shall conduct a study to research the implications of these different
LOS Standards that FDOT has established for state roads by area type. Establishing unreasonably
high LOS standards in the fringe "transitioning urban area" may require the diversion of revenues from
more congested areas with lower levels of service standards, in order to maintain the high standards
established in the outlying areas.
OBJECTIVE 2:
The County will maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making
the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Future Traffic Circulation Map.
Capital Improvement Element those projects necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service on
the roads identified on the Five (5) Year Future Traffic Circulation Map.
Policy 2.2:
The County shall annually appropriate the funds necessary to implement those projects show in the
annual element (first year) of the Second~,,y Road Program.
OBJECTIVE 3:
The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right-of-ways.
Policy 3.1:
The County has implemented an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program.
Policy 3.2:
The County ch3!,~ includes in its annual Capital Improvement Element no less than $200,000 per year
specifically earmarked for use in an advanced Right-of-Way Acquisition Program. By December 1997
a study shall be conducted to identify the long range right-of way needs of the transpodation system
based on buildout. Following the completion of this study, the funding set-aside may be amended to
more accurately reflect the County's annual need.
Policy 3.3:
By June 1998, Collier County's Transportation Department, Office of Capital Projects Management and
the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization will develop standards, criteria and
implementation guidelines for right-of-way acquisition. Provision for landscaping shall be consistent
with Collier County corridor management planning policies (see Future Land Use Element Policy 4.2
and Tra~c C!rcu!at!cn E!=ment Transportation Element Policy 7.4), The County shall acquire
sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate no less than a cross section of (6) traffic lanes, appropriate
turn lanes, medians, bicycle ~ nd pedestrian features, drainage canals, and shoulder sufficient for pull
offs and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way standard may be considered when it can
be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out
will be less than the standard.
OBJECTIVE 4:
The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, and motorizedT and
non-motorized vehicles throuqh the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway
Policy 4.I:
TRAN -90
The County shall, incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan by reference and
update the Plan as needed. tc '~ ..... ~,,,.~ ^~,~., .... ;h~.. !mp!ement '~ r,,,,;... r, .... t,,
.... u .............. t' ......................... ·
Policy 4,2:
The County shall provide for suppod seaices, resources and staff within the Naples (Collier County)
Metropolitan Planning Organization to coordinate the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program.
Policy 4.3:
The County shall provide an interconnected and continuos bicycle and pedestrian system by making
the improvements identified on the 2020 Pathway Facilities Map series.
Policy 4.4:
The County shall annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program which establishes pathway priorities
to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians.
Policy 4.5:
The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local
funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program.
Policy 4.6:
The County shall provide for the safe movement of motorized vehicles through implementation of its
Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate both bike
lanes and sidewalks in new construction and reconstruction of roadways.
The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resu~acing projects
Policy 4.8:
The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction
standards developed by the Florida Depadment of Transpodation.
PcHcy ~.!!:
,,,~,,~,,,~ ...... ,.,,,,~ ~,~,,,, ......
~~hbcrhccd Trs~c Man:gsmcnt Prcgr~m:
TRAN -91
· .,,~,, ~,vT~,~ ~,.~ .~
.,,~ ~.,.7 ~,,~,, ~,..,~.,,7 ~.~,~_.~ .,,~ .... ~,~,,,~.,..~,~., ~, .,,~.., ~ ..~ ......~,~.~ ~... ..... ,~...
, ~ y,~ ....,~ ~'~7~,,,,~ ", ~,',~' ~,',]s ,,,~ ~"'7 ~ ..... ~ ~"~' ~" ~ .... ~' ~'~7v'~ '~"'~"
The County will coordinate the Tr3~c C~rcu~ationTranspo~ation System development process with the
Future Land Use Map.
Policy 5.1:
The County Commission will review all r~ ':.one requests with consideration of their impact on the overall
system, and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already
operating and/or projected to operate within one year at an unacceptable Level of Se~ice unless
specific mitigating stipulations are approved.
Policy 5.2:
Significant Impact is hereby defined as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 5% of the
Level of Se~ice C peak hour volume of an impacted roadway.
OBJECTIVE 6:
The County shall coordinate the Tr=f~c C~rcu~=t~en E~emcnt Transpo~ation Element with the plans and
programs of the State, Region, and other local jurisdictions.
Policy 6.1:
The T..~. CSr:ul:t~cn E~cment Transpo~ation Element shall incorporate to the greatest
degree possible, the long range plans of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning
Organization.
Policy 6.2:
The Tr=~: C~r:~=tScn E~cment Transpodation Element shall consider any and all applicable roadway
plans of the City of Naples, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Lee County.
Policy 6.3:
~e Tr=~= C~r:u~:t~cn E~cment Transpo~ation Element shall be consistent in its interace into the
a~e~allcollector system within the City of Naples.
The Tr=~c C~rc'~=t~en E~cment Transpo~ation Element shall consider the State's adopted Five (5)
Year Work Program. the Florida Transpo~ation Plan, and the State Land Development Plan.
Policy 6.5
The Naples MPO 1995 & 2010 plans have identified a need for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden
Gate Parkway, An Interchange Justification Report shall be prepared by the Florida Department of
Transportation and submitted to the Federal Highway Administration by October 1, 1998.
OBJECTIVE 7:
The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining
properties, as well as encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation.
Policy 7.1:
On August 18, 1992 the County adopted an Access Management Resolution that ensures the
protection of the aderial and collector system's capacity.
I Policy 7.2:
The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all
rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on
surrounding neighborhood streets.
Policy 7.3:
The County shall implement, through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of safe and convenient
on-site traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a
primary objective in review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other
appropriate stages of review in the land development applications process.
Policy 7.4:
The County shall develop corridor management plans (see the Future Land Use Element) that take into
consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along
the major arterial entrances to the urban area,
Policy 7.5
The Collier County Streetscape Master Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners shall
provide for a comprehensive plan to address the design, implementation, and maintenance standards
for landscaping enhancements along major road corridors. This Plan also identifies a sequence for
roadway enhancements and potential funding sources.
OBJECTIVE 8:
The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management System" for the scheduling,
funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities.
Policy 8.1
Each year, the county will use short term projections of previous years' traffic volume growth to
estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies will occur on county roads. This information will be used
to prepare the annual update of the county's Capital Improvement Element for roads, in a manner that
ensures the maintenance of concurrency on road facilities.
Policy 8.2
Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public
Facilities Ordinance ~'Land Development Code Section 3.15), development proposals shall be required
to submit traffic impact analyses, the level of detail of which shall be determined by the total number of
new tdps generated by the development.
OBJECTIVE 9:
TRAN -93
The County shall encourage nei.qhborhood involvement, and safe and pleasant conditions for the
residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, through the implementation
the Collier County Nei.qhborhood Traffic Manaqement Pro~ram(NTMP).
The County shall,-~-~:~e-Or~cxtent .... ;~q,, ;,,,,,,~ ....~ ,~, r,,,,;^, County Ne!ghbcrhccd Tr3~c
~ g ~ prcpnred .... ap.~. ~ .............~, .......,. .......
~ incorporate the Neifihborhood Traffic Manaqement Pro.qram by reference and update as
needed.
I Policy 9.2
The County shall provide for support services, resources and staff to coordinate the Program.
Policy 9.3
The County shall encourage the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate the
convenient movement throughout the Ioc ~ road network unless such action will promote through
traffic.
Policy 9.4
The County shall define on a project by project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a
result of a traffic management project
Policy 9.5
The County shall route through traffic to the major roadways designated in the Tr3~c C~rc',J'!at~cn
E-4eme~ Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan,
Policy 9.6
The County shall, *"' ~-, Gro:tect ""~""+ .... =~-~'- ~nc','re ~"'~ _.- ~,,,m ..........~ prc~oct w~ "^*
im~ review impacts on emergency vehicle access or response time to neighborhoods.
Policy 9.7
Roadways listed in Appendix A under "Roadways in Collier County not Considered Local Facilities" are
not eligible for the NTMP.
Policy 9.8
The County shall employ a variety of traffic calming devices to achieve the NTMP'S objectives for a
project. Such traffic calming devices shall be planned and designed in conformance with sound
engineering and planning practices.
Policy 9.9
To implement the NTMP, certain procedures shall be followed in processing neighborhood traffic
management requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the limits
available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for:
- submittal of project proposals;
- evaluation of proposals by staff;
- citizen participation in plan development and evaluation;
- methods of temporarily testing traffic management plans when needed;
- communication of any test results and specific findings to area residents and
T~N~4
affected neighborhood organizations before installation of permanent traffic calm~'~J
devices; and
appropriate County Commission review.
OBJECTIVE 10
The County shall encourage, tc the gre3tect extent .... ;~ safe and efficient mobility for the rural
public.
Policy 10.1
The County shall develop a program to examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural
roadway system. This program will address the mobility needs of the rural resident to include the
availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, as well as for hurricane evacuatio~ purposes.
Policy 10.2
The County shall continue to improve transit services for the Transportation Disadvantaqed in the rural
areas throuqh the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC).
Objective 11
The County s.hc!! dsvs!cp = Tr~nspc."t~:;';n E!e,ment tc ,.~, .................................. ·
~ The County shall maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe,
and environmentally compatible facilities
Policy 11.1
The County shall incorporate by reference the Immokalee Re.qional Airpod, Ever.qlades Airpark, and
Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plans.
Policy 11.2
The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for
implementinq future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans.
Objective 12:
The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future.
Policy 12.1:
The Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planninq Or.qanization, throu.qh the Transportation
Disadvantaqed Proqram shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the
implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transpodation
disadvantaged.
Policy 12.2:
The County shall coordinate the development of any future transit development plans with the Naples.
('Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Florida Department of Transportation.
Policy 12.3
The Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Plannin~ Orqanization shall monitor the need and desirability
of implementinq a transit system and will coordinate the development of any transit development plans.
Policy 12.4:
The County shall, in reco~.nition that the potential.for public transit service between Bonita Spdn.qs in
Lee County and Naples exists, consider any inter.qovernmental efforts necessary,
TRAN -95
Policy 12.5:
The County shall participate in the MPO planning process through an interlocal agreement with the City
of Naples and in a Joint Participation A.qreement with the FDOT.
Policy '12.6:
The County will participate in the MPO planning process by maintaining a votincl presence on the
Technical Advisory Committee to the MPO.
Policy 12.7:
Followinq the adoption of any transit development plan, the County shall initiate the development of
transit right-of-way and corridor protection strategies, including ordinances and policy additions.
Policy 12.8:
Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of service standard for transit
facilities.
Policy 12.9
The County shall include capital expendi*.Vres for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital
Improvement Element.
TRAN -96
COLL!ER COUNTY GRO.WT, H ,,u.A,m',;AGE,u,.ENT PLAN
TRANSPORTAT)ON ELEMENT
Av!ctien S'Jb - E!~men~.
AM, ENDM, ENTE TO COLL!ER COUNTY GRO,WTH MANAGE)!ENT PLAN,
AV - 1
In Au"uet ''~ ~ n~ k,, iF,^ ,.e;.^..;,,,, ^f iF,^ r,,,,;.. r,,.. ,,,i,, D,,.,.,~ ,,4: Count" Ccmm~::,ioncr:,
~,,~v,,. ...... 7, "'~' ""'~ '~'" ..... ~ ~""~"~ .... '~ ..... P"~'~ ~t'~'~' .....
E×ecutivc ,~,!rpod. T.hccc p!~n: prey!tic !nc!ght c= tc cx!-,,!!.",g...~cc!!StSc= -"-nd ccnd!ticnc c.".d
c:X!ST!NG F.~.C!L!T!c_.$
..
: c~.,,-t, ...... ,4 ;.,4: ....i;,,,, ~- ..........g tC
e O^,.,;,-,n.-d p~.r:.~., .'~r, rl e.I,,rl;,.,,- r,,',~.r,;h-dl,, .',r~,..(,;r,,'. f,,I .....-,;.r,,.,rf rl.~,,.-.I,-,r,r~.r,I .-.,-;;,,;I,,:"
lm. rn,,ck:!cc Re~icn~ .~.!rpc'."t :
· "~ ~"t'~'' '~ '~'~ .... ~ '. '~ ~'~ ~"~ "' "'~ "~ ..... ~""~' P"~" .....
.... th ,,4: Ih,~ ,...~,..~,'..r~ I ;+tl~ ,/,.,,,,~h..,,.,r,.,,-~r,I h.~,. ..-..-.,-, ,,.,,-I ,-.I IF,. ~;,r.,..,,.+ e;r,r-, ;~,. h.-,.-,r,t^, ^t ~:~
'.
-~; ..... ol ..... ~, ...... 4:' "'""'" f:Cil!t!C: .........................................
r~r-ep, glh ..... ;,.4 ...... i;,,,,.-a ,..,,,,..,b;i;+ ....... a,~ ,,,,i,, ~,, M,~,-.h~e- &X, ,,;,..;,....s!
........................................................... a-. .............. 7.
tD?3ce ";""'~ ;+'' opc~!ng, ct,.~r 'F,""' 'F, ...... :.^,~ .-.-,;.t ......... :^,-i. e;t, ,.t^,~ .,,
AV - 2
,~,, ~,~, ~,, ~,,~v,~ ,,vv ,,~v~ ~.~ ~, ~,,,,..vv~,,,~ v,,,~,, ~.. ~,,,~, ~,.v
Through 3 :~-~ cwep "';~ ;h~ e,.~. ~ :l~.;~ +~. p .... , ......., .......;,~A +~. 3~rp~
,~,,~ ,,,,,, ,,,~ ~,~,~ ~, , ,~,,~ ,,,~ ~,,,~ ,vv~,,,,7 ~H,,,,~ ,~,v
~..,~.,,,~ ~,,,,v,~ ........~ "'~'~ ~"~ '"""~1 ...,,~,. ,~ ~.~ ,~, ,~..~ ~.,~ .~ ,v~. -..~
~E POTENTIAL OPPORTUNETSES
lmmok:~:c Re~!on:~ A~rpc~
.......... ~ ....................... ~ ..........~ ........~ ...... , ..................... ff~ .......
,,~.,~., .,,~, .,,.~ ~,,H~.. ~ .... ~..,~ .~,~,,~, ~ ......~ , ~.,~.~ .....~.,..~.,~.,~ .~ ... ~,.~
.~.~,~ .... ~ , ..,~,.,. .. ,~ ~.v,,,v.,~ vH~,.~... ~, ., ,v ~.,~,...~ ~,,,,~,~ ~,~
~.~,,v,,,,.~,,. ~, .,,~ ~,,~.~ .,. ~,,j~.,~.,~ ........... ~ v~.. .... ~, , .~,,~ .,..~,..~.,~ ....
.... H .......... ~ ............ ~' '--I ..... ~ ............. ~ ................ ~ .........
~,~ ~ ............................... ~ ..........~ ............. ~ .................
' '~ ......~"7, "'~ ....~F"'~ .... ~" ~'~ ...... ' ......H~" "'~7 ~ ~ ~'~""~' ~""'~"""~
· ,.v .v~,~,,~, ~ .....~.~ ....l ~,,~, ~ .....~,,.,.~ .~ ..v., .~. .~.~,~ ,,,~,,..,.., ....~ .~,,,..v .......
.................... ff~ ......... ;~ .... H .................. ~ ...................... 7 .....
, ....v~ ~,~,.~,,~ .... ~ ~,,~,~, ,,,~,,, ~, ,,.~ ~,~,~.~,v~, ,,, p~,,, ,-,~,~, , ,~., ~,,,~,,~
....
.......
AV - 3
ESTIMATED DF.V_LOP..u. ENT TLV. ELLu. ES AND COSTS
AND POL!CY
A;...^.t. -.n,~ u.,...A ,..i,,...~ Exo:utSv: A;.,.^.+ ..,.,~.. Dt,,,,~ ~.,^ lh .......
AV - 4
COLL!ER COUMTY
GRO,~-r'T'.H MANAGEMENT PLAN
I
T-RANn,"JJ~RTAT!ON ELEMENT
MASS-TRANS!T SUS-ELEMENT
D,,,,.,-,,.,.,,..I
SOAR_n OF COUNTY CO..u,M!SS)ONERS
AMENDMENTS TO COLUER COUNTY GRO..tY~r.H MANAGEMENT PLAN
MASS TRANS!T S'J9 ELE.u.,ENT
~umk,,'d I'"'l~.l'^ A mAR,.l^,-I t'~,.,.4:,-,...,,-.A kin
TA-c>LE OF CONTENTS
Section
A. PURPOSE MT--3 ~
I 9. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS MT4 ~
P ~n^lc O~JECT!VES AND POL!C!ES MT-4
.MT !W c,,. ....~,-~o,- T .... ;. u-,,. MT ~
Tr3nc!t Dem3nd Centers 3nd Cerridcrc
~!estern r-,,,,;~.. r, ....~,,
.............
Tr3nsit Dem:nd Centers 3nd Ccrfidcrc
F;3gtorn r...,;~. r- ....
............. ·
MASS TRANS!T E-L-E-MEN~
v~,,,~, ~v~,,,] ~,,~,,,,7 ,,~ ,,~ ~ .... ~'7 ~F~''~'~ ....
Pdvat9 ccnT~ccc ~"~'~ ~n *~ n .... *" arc ~:~
..... ~y~,,~, .....v, ~,~,,~, .,~,,~,~
· ,,~ ,.~,,v7 ~7~,~,,,~ ,,,~ ........~ ~ .... ~,~ ,,,~
.~,~,~ ~. v~ ..... ~"~ ~7~'~'''~ "~ ~" ~ Y'~"~'
~,~;,h~, ,~ F~orid3 Oc~a~mcnt ~ Trans~c~afien's
~'~"'7 "'~ ~""~ ....... ~ "~"~" ~7~'~"" ...... ~ ...... ~ ..... ~ "'~' ~"~"' ~'~'~ ~"~ ' ~'~'
..... 7~,~,,7 F,~,~, .... ,~ ,,,~ ~,~ ,~ ......... ~ .... ,~,,~,,~
~'~7 ~' ~ ..... ~,, ~7~,~ .....~ ,,~, ~,.,v, ~"'I ~'"~7 "~ .......Y .....~"""~ ~ ~7~'~ ....
MT- 2
B. FUTUR; SYSTEM ,NE~EDS
~ ...... company ~;~'
......... ~,,,~,,~,,,,~ ,,,~ ~, .... ff ~, ~1~,~,,, ,,,~ ...............
,,,~,,,,~,,~,,~ ~, ,,,~ ~]~,~ ........ ~ ~,~,, · .... ~ .....
soc~ccccncm~c characteristics.
......... ~ ......~, ,~ ~] · .......~ ...........~ ,~,~,~
...................... u ...... Ways ..................
MT- 3
MT- 4
Tr,?.-ns!t D~m~nd C:nter-,, & Tr:n-,,!t Cordtier,",
E,?.-stcrn r-,,m,-- r, ....,.
MT- 5
MASS TRANS)T ELEMENT
GOAL !: TO PROV!D-':: THE OPPORT'JN)TY FOR A F'JT'JRE MASS TRANS!T SYSTEM.
~ Nap~ec Mctrcpolitcn O~..;.. Or"an~at~cn thrcu-h the ~'~'~ Cccrd~nat~
, ,~ .......~~ ~ ~ ~,~,~ , ,~,,~, , ,~,~,,, ~,,~,,
PcYcy 2, !:
.... ~ ~,,~ ..........~, ,,,~ ,,~ ~ ..... ~,,.~,,,,y ~ .....y,v,,,~,,,,,,~,,~,,~,, ~y~,~,,, -- ........~,~,,,~,~
MT- 6