The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 03/22/2007 GMP (CP-05-04 thru CP-05-06)Vanasse Daylor Application to Amend Collier County Growth Management Plan Golden Gate Area Master Plan FLUE Element To Establish the Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Final Application Package — Petition CP- 2005 -04 November 21, 2006 revised January 31, 2007 Submitted to: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department Community Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida, 34104 Prepared for: Timothy Ferguson, Esq Ferguson Law Group 4265 Bonita Beach Rd Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Prepared by: Ronald F Nino, AICP Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Blvd., Suite 600 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 Job # 80885.10 Naples Ferguson Law Group, LLC 4265 Bonita Beach Road Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Ft Myers St Petersburg Tampa Office (239) 947 -3600 Ferelaw (i� Earthlink.Net Fax (239) 947 -3610 April 19, 2005 Mr. David Weeks AICP Chief Planner, Comprehensive Planning Community Development Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear David, Please find the enclosed application to amend the relevant parts of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. This application is submitted for the purpose of amending the Future Land Use Element, Golden Gate Master Plan and the related Plan Map from its current - agricultural zoning to a commercial mixed -use sub district. We believe that the application demonstrates a need for commercial zoning where the subject property is located. With the widening of Livingston Road and the construction of the new I -75 interchange, the amount of traffic that impacts this site has and will increase to the point that residential uses are impractical on this site. We project ingress an- egress coming off of Livingston Road so that traffic patterns on Golden Gate Parkway will not be affected. Furthermore, the low intensity nature of the proposed uses can be buffered away from golden Gate Parkway so as to retain much of its residential feel. We thank you for the guidance that you have provided at the pre - application conference and look forward to your review of our application. We would appreciate the opportunity to resolve any problem that staff may have with this application and thank staff in advance for their time and consideration of this application. If you have any questions concerning this or any other matter, pleas feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerelv, IT othy WkFe on , Atto ney at Law APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: (ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (941)403 -2300; Fax: (941)643- 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941 - 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Joseph E & Heather L Townsend Company Mailing Address 11150 Livingston Rd City Naples State FL Zip Code 34105 Phone Number (239) 659 -4235 Fax Number (239) 659 -3359 B. Name of Agent* Timothy W Ferguson, Esquire * THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company /Firm Ferguson Law Group Mailing Address 4265 Bonita Beach Road City Bonita Springs State FL Zip Code 34134 02/2002 Phone Number (239) 947 -3600 Fax Number (239) 947 -3610 Email Address C. Name of OwnE Mailing Address fer2law(i ,earthlink.net of Record Joseph E & Heather L. Townsend 11150 Livingston Rd City Naples State FL Zip Code 34105 Phone Number (239) 659 -4235 Fax Number (239) 659 -3359 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. See Exhibit I.D. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Joseph E & Heather L Townsend 100% 11150 Livingston Rd Naples ❑r 34105 B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired ( ) leased ( ): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 III. DESCRIPTOIN OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description B. Section: 30 C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) Golden Gate Estates Unit 29 Tract 7 Township: 49 Range: 26 38100360007 & 38100400006 D. General Location N.E. Corner of Livingston Road & Golden Gate Parkway E. Planning Community G. Size in Acres Urban Estates F. TAZ 167 5.15± Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) IV. TYPE OF REQUEST I\ f. A L H. Zoning Estates Estates Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: Future Land Use x Golden Gate Area Master Plan _ Immokalee Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Transportation Housing Coastal & Conservation Recreation & Open Space Intergovernmental Coord. Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste Drainage Natural Groundwater Aquifer Pg 5 - Policy 1.1.2 & GGAMP Amend Page(s) Pg. 12 - Policy 5.2.3 of the (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Element As Follows: ( Use Gress thFeagkls to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV B Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, FROM: Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict District, Subdistrict TO: Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict (See Exhibit IV C) District, Subdistrict [if new District and /or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) 4 02/2002 E. Describe additional changes requested: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8'/3 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. V.A.] Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2 V.A.2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. V.A.3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. V.B.1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. V.C.1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AEIRAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2 V.C.2 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). 3. V.C.3 Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. D. GROWTH MANAGMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. N Is the proposed amendment directly related tot a proposed Small 02/2002 Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation tree Exhibit V.D.51 and districVsubdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district/subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). E. PUBLIC FACILITIES V.E. Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) V.E.1A Potable Water b) V.E.1B Sanitary Sewer C) V.E.1C Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS d) V.E- Drainage e) V.F. Solid Waste f) V.E. Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. V.E.2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services). 4. V.E. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. 02/2002 F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. y.F.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). 2. N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps), 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable 4. N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. x ** $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly) 4. x Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). 5. x Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -1/2 x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. ** Fee paid April 22, 2005 - see Exhibit V.G.1 (receipt) 02/2002 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Timothy W. (Name of Agent - typed or to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed: fA F-AT- A-.r-R L. Tow t- /51= rrr7 Date: �Q�o (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF ( trio KiD4 COUNTY OF ( c-& ,a 1 f tR Sworn to and subscribed befor me this _ By 414e&e4 9( Pi (Notary P I lic) CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: ✓ who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath V did not take an Oath CA 0, It 01 V A RUNSIN . I Mini 14pathe- L T�ct�nse Name - Typed or Printed 23 day of MA ( 2000 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: y"4 N.ncy L. m 10 MYc y j• Mr commission DD34 Il wTTwr' mmEx*" Snwm w Y2. as identification NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term." D2/2002 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Timothy W. Ferguson (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed: f ow NSJWD Date: 5 Z3 o G (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best,pi my knowlecjye. n ;J-05fP14 F. ?--dei �Ni1 Name — Typed or Printed STATE OF COUNTY OF Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of lJ�% 20zlk By <( I "-/ W (Notary ublic) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath �- did not take an Oath M `p,rrr��rrrr��' runty L . racrwc 1 My Commmion O03420i7 1a.�I' Ev4m SpMmWr 22,2006 as Identification NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 — False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 02!2002 Rpr 18 05 10:15a Joe Townsend 239- 659 -3359 p.3 This instrument prepared by: Ronnie Evans First Fidelity Title, Inc. 5150 Tamiami Trail, N. #401 Naples, FL 34t03 Property Appraisers Parcel Identificution Number: 38100400006 & prt 3810036007 WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED made this 2 7 day of August, 2003 by Alfred J. Vlggtant, a single man hereinafter called the Grantor(s), to Joseph E. Townsend and Heather L. Townsend, h usband a nd w Ife whose post office address is 11150 L ivingston R oad, Naples, Florida 34105, hereinafter called the Grantee: WTTNESSETH: That the Grantors for and i n consideration of the sum o f $ 10.00 and o ther valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, r elease, convey and confirm unto the Grantee a 11 that certain land situate i n Collier County, State of Florida, viz: The North Half of Tract 7, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof recorded In Plat Book 7, page 57, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER, with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in nnywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any AND the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantee that the Grantors arc lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantors hereby fully warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2002. Rpr 16 05 10:15a Joe Townsend 239 - 659 -3359 p.4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have signed and sealed these presents the day and Witness N2 si �e V Witness k2 print name STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier 'Che foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of August, 2003, by Alfre i��Ia lIr a si ie than who is /are personally lno o me or w ha eve produced (/y'./_�/�.(J3`' as identificefion. pM�* Rtondo evens • <,d MYCOMM6RMI DD11190 EAnRES ! Deremas: t8 raDS wowmunrora19, 00a¢wc N ry Public Printed Nat My Curnptission Expires: (SEAL) Details Current Ownershi Page 1 of 1 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 TR 7 LESS N 112 OF TRACT 7 t aeciwn II i ownsrup II Range 11 Acres li Map No. �� Strap No. 30 49 26 2.4 4630 335200 7 041330 I Sub No. 335200 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 �I ' i Millaae AM Millaae Use Code L-- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 10 1 12.4374 2006 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subject to Change) If all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Land Value $ 234,000.00 Date Book - Page Amount ( +) Improved Value $ 330,313.00 09 / 2003 3389. - ..2882 $ 410,000.00 (_) Market Value $ 564, 13.00 0611998 2429 -2339 $ 0.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 121,752.00 F10/1994 1a9t. -_345 $ 150,000.00 (_) Assessed Value $ 442,561.00 -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 25,000.00 (_) Taxable Value $ 417,561.00 ,; ., - aave cur nomes- exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. http:// www. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetai 1. asp ?FolioID = 000003 8100360007 11/13/2006 This instrument prepared by: Ronnie Evans First Fidelity Title, hre. 5150 Tamiami Trail, N. ,11401 Naples, FL 34103 3293681 OR: 3389 PG; 2882 °ECOADED it OF ?:CIA- REMD& 04 Col @R COMM, 09,10512003 at 01:37PH Dtiia'T E. Bp-ICE, CIEIiE CON' 410010 Er FBI 7C Di11:•, 7;'. ,170 P.et:: FIR57 M111717 "."LE ti'{ I, Property Appraisers Parcel Identification Number: a portion of 38100360007 WARRANTY DEED TATS WARRANTY DEED [Wade d i'} -day of August, 2003 by Alfred J. Viggiani, a single man hereinafter called the Grantor(s), to Joseph E. Townsend and Heather L, Townsend, h usband a ad w ife whose post office address is 11150 L ivingston R oad, Naples, Florida 34105, hereinafter called the Grantee: WITNESSETH: That the Grantors for and in consideration of the sum of$10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby aclotowledged, hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee all that certain land situate in Collier County, State of Florida, viz: The South 1/2 of Tract 7 , Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER, with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. "1-0 HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any AND the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantee that the Grantors are lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantors hereby fully warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2002. *** OR: 3389 PG: 2883 *** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed m t,Me pre3eupe of. '01 i ss #I/ hxtwe 1fred Viggiani —fit. 6 Witnuss #2 print name STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c� Alfred J.'Viggla I 1, . pja pit e man who o is/am Personally known to m or as identjficgfioxn- A� I P� I 14� w MM MY UOMMISSICA 9 M715M MRES Decamleer 19, 2005 of August, 2003, by s/44v'e produced Notady Public Printed Name MY Commission Expires: (SEAL) Details Current Ownersh Page 1 of 1 Owner Name I TOWNSEND, JOSEPH E =& HEATHER L Adtlresses 1495 GORDON RIVER LN City NAPLES Statell FL ZIP11 34104.5296 Legal GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 29 N 112 OF TRACT 7 Section Township I Map No. Strap No. 30 49 11 L 2.34 4B30 335200 7 14630 Sub No. 335200 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 "J Millage Area It Mlllaoe " Use Co 27 IMPROVED COMMERCIAL 10 12.4374 2006 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subject to Change) If all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Land Value $ 304,200.00 Date Book - Page Amount ( +) Improved Value $ 3AIA9 ()Oil 0912003 3390-10, $ 110,000.00 ( =) Market Value $ 338,362.00 O6 / 1998 2429-2339 $ 0.00 (•} SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 10/1994 1991.. -.345 $ 150,000.00 (_) Assessed Value $ 338,362.00 (-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00 (_) Taxable Value $ 338,362.00 - � uvr nonros exempt vame aue to cap on assessment increases. CIM The Information is Updated Weekly. http: / /www.collierappraiser. com/RecordDetail.asp ?FolioID= 000003 8100400006 11/13/2006 GMP Amendment CP- 2005 -04 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Exhibit I.D. (Revised May 2006) AUTHORIZED AGENTS AND CONSULTANTS Authorized Agents Consultants Ronald F. Nino, AICP Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Blvd., Suite 600 Ft. Myers, FL 33919 Telephone: 239-437-4601 Fax: 239-437-4636 Timothy W. Ferguson, Attorney at Law Ferguson Law Group, LLC 4265 Bonita Beach Road Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Traffic E. Randy Spradling, P.E. Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Blvd., Suite 600 Ft. Myers, FL 33919 Telephone: 239-437-4601 Fax: 239-437-4636 Environmental Tim Hall Turrell & Associates 3584 Exchange Ave, Ste B Naples, FL 34104 Telephone: 239-643-0166 Fax: 239 -643 -6632 Apr 01 05 12:08p p,2 fiEETING NOTES COLLIER COUNTY * * ** DEVELOPMEIIT SERVICES DEPARTMENT * * ** DATE }) !i TIME Q -oOa— NOTES BY HI6 D Z'/ TOPIC OF MEETING 6M �}(�tm _ ! �f L'1�1G. •f5 '. )n GO y ATTENDANCE(print name clearly) for NrGf 6d f4 /A. kan Nino c .7a' -r' <« _ Tin, F-&4 �1on Gle u A& xp _ k4T VA, MKGiA �NE ^.Il _ KEY POINTS /UNDERSTANDINGS /CONCLUSIONS q G"0. l /J /[ _ llvgoSG 6w, VLniY.nc2 T' I �ri�l�i �/trr/Y rGl � 'r •rl0/i, P�fZf. 9 i �Gor,Jf GvulmJ Tor Ooh fl - /Y°MBrc )fan R"/h L0'2' 4110t.'W 775 A.f rct-,y-4 �n. Th js, L.hlfan 3�. wlr�.;n i/1 fi^7/w 17 ; nvv� n'ae a Q w�a</ elf c %va6 Ilir cun�l e d�U irrvc fF,/,(R'l &td h� A/W CA nc , it 2Pi oDnb �—e f DF /➢(f /n. G� 4r1i➢ / K �r w. iec .�,X nv7 Ff�'�r /nuA ) (a �;1 i0c <�le�. �'l,e�. -,y �r wlr ✓.,Y sya >r �n v1 -03. _ / I fr.11c174( /lrvf i- GI /r�i�y'+rf t /lyv4�' �n,E fl)fv fr�AGll a.�_f GU. .G'F t%1.LJ -S' ©Pa.Y` L / • 1 �yYh� O'�iCd yf�',��s Vf� w/v /q jt- S�.� /fie. nvf'c.�n -6 ih /t'l�ry DYl'e� 81S !�F/ /DU.`/7�'n caccrn r. i, r,4.nJ Py l,c•, �2.3 �.vi.,'G;�, Gi7h+ h /�`( /BG� /mr /h •i FI /ow.;Q GoM �/ C@ TAI. /�'1�� (,lfi,MT RG;�y Ga •••�•.. a�Po aQ .� nN') YGC Lch l d.f l"i ail )h �"cYl a-7�'• ✓•.. not nud' (Of t/,a any. 46 r5j vDf74 1A 0, �° � I �� v r9 /lIJ�' �n v�� ^. F GJM — Z�nCsQ t 2✓ a��, j T � p.. - w's0,Clq r>� diJ. dG'Ijha�e;Q ��t n.; 'V&f 74,J ep.. / A+p 6L44 ni tL.l rJ it nyl} T�'APP St�d d . c,4 en,A;leJ Y'o }rot jti N�f v:. glR .x gfA,P : Iwu Pw APp. luty, � L Nlasf� propo.aP _'!. or?---Pp. -.V4 h�1cP Sbn f {11 21A. {w v. o ty l (attach additional pages if necessary) LE •Al VESCRIPTInN BEING PACT i, GOLDEN GgIE £STq TES UNIT N6 29, ACEUR➢O TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORD E➢ IN PLAT BO, B( I, 'AGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS Or COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THIS SURVEY SHOWS THE C ROPOVE.) MR .H HALF AND SOUTH HALF OF SAID TRACT >, LLSS THE R74D RIGHT -OF -WAYS. ]� YV a.rrF,l oOET �a RRUmc:: uscxmr 6 IC MLE I IRj II 0 N Ih � V IZ ry N C'j ry � N I I o ql ell Y IN Q N �I I I do r aary 1 a a_� C. W,LN N I s ' N i I s S.B9'4O'SO•E. 359.06' (P) nR x➢ 1d S.D9'J9'1P'E. 339.06' (H) � -- - ---r'A IASCNFNI BpXf d,S P.ILd Sli \ 1 b VLM1 R I cum y, =m o F II _I abN' yY v0 w V' JC m {ate 11' za �a F'I O yl` O H-1 Z -o Q.Fai q5 fN <!H Llnr FENCE Ir P I C 1� i621� j T I MI �wNr. o J�VI V I� [WJN . Afi lFN2 q d<E PIWY L' AfF —IIO t d mlP., cLUa u..,. rrxrr _ — — — — e 9 12 .1 § i f yky'�gtg Sd9'1O'5O'E 339.00• (ID I S.d9'39'12•E. 310.02' (N) g 9 fr ral ad A� E }@ 2u�i y a or trmY .4CrI0 CORK Mm L1VlNGSr6V R➢ �q � 1�" a� �$�5g^ �M� k 7 Cmrc PAD 6 q�R56d�8 0d1Y� ti 05 3 ° @Jill pile, I P � N, 1; �y s4iM e8 30e CONE PA. 1 1 ^F C � Y 9 .3 1 . @d�?a a ?G + i €s@ qtt NCV RZMf -B -VAY I d SH fA 6,rF PA AY IPo'R R FLwr •...y>..tt .. ....... . CA 6MIM GM PAWWAY 16S RIV KV RIV i'A• N09.4O3O'N. 36A54 (P) X Iw L.m 11(,L rrOM iT I(IM IM'19'10'C �'d 69EE- 699 -6EZ PAasumoy aoE d86:60 50 40 JdH p l� W s a r G G S V b" g� Ln 3 L n x c N Y I 2 � O � I O , F45EA A 2 n z x 'z n GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD P x 0 i x Q OO M k y s q �I Vanasse Daylor s- 7;Aft AW E Towsw - --- �. TOIM•M— IIQNYII vxq f%IIINIf CngW I k* flip $e[hon 90. Ionns�r0 19 5, Pange 36 E [Dore. Cj, �Caa GMP Amendment CP- 2005 -04 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict EXHIBIT IV. B (Revised 1125107) Policy 1.1.2: Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located on the east side of Livingston Road and north side the Golden Gate Parkway at the intersection of said two streets both of which are classified as arterial roads. The property is five (5) acres in size having approximately 660 feet of frontage on Livingston Road and 330 feet of frontage on Golden Gate Parkway. The intent of this district is to allow principally office uses with a limited amount of neighborhood retail uses. The development of this Subdistrict will be governed by the following criteria: a. All Conditional Uses permitted in the underlying residential district b. Development is to be implemented through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning process. c. A unified planned development with a common architectural theme with shared access and cross access agreements will be developed d. The maximum gross floor area of office uses shall be limited to 40,000 square feet of office uses as allowed in the C -1 Commercial Professional and General Office District. e. Driveways and curb cuts shall be limited to right- in/right -out turning movements only. f. All Principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of seventy-five (75) feet from the Proiect's northern boundary. g. A twenty -five (25) foot wide landscape strip shall be Provided along the entire frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road h. Building heights shall be limited to two (2) stories and a maximum of thirty-five (33.5_) feet. i. All lighting shall be architecturally designed and limited to a height of twenty (25) feet. Such lighting shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses Policy 5.2.3: Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subsection of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest comer of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, and the northeast corner of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway. .� % Sa IFI:BI GMP %ASC I11,d,, ve ROAD F N 4- G.G. 6PKWY+ SITE GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP \. \VLIi If1.11A.\I. VF ..AL OIL IVELL 2 'CPRO✓ECT SITE .,. R 25 G I Ii LA L 6 20 N INSET Q 0 Scale: 1 "— 6000' S Scale: l "— 4 mi. 80885 088 N0' 12710 Na Brivany Boulevard, Suite 600 raee,wao roa Vanasse FodN FI 33907 +ace mu + 941.931.4601 r 941.417.4636 F 4 eoac aeLC TON^7— A4_ gl_IdY'L-lldlplg�3�f�on.RI�o�ad L B+ Cua,olgl ypr VWI/IYIJIVII DaylO1 1001 T37.46i frail41.43 463 206 462ro sPiL, rt a4u5 FLUM Napk; FI 14103 EXHIBIT IY.0 941.403.0223 r941.263.5096 • vand .mu °TiR'u` wrx -08 -os Sheet No. of 1 G:\ProJe \808 \80885\GoldGateFLUM \80885- FLUM3pg.dwg, 11/13/20%4:12:28 PM, \\VarMav- er\\ \CANON \Print LEGEND ❑ ■ ■ 0 \'n Vl. f'.9 I11110AiLlF. RO♦D rarzs rrarta ] ROAD F N 4- G.G. 6PKWY+ SITE GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP \. \VLIi If1.11A.\I. VF ..AL OIL IVELL 2 'CPRO✓ECT SITE .,. R 25 G I Ii LA L 6 20 N INSET Q 0 Scale: 1 "— 6000' S Scale: l "— 4 mi. 80885 088 N0' 12710 Na Brivany Boulevard, Suite 600 raee,wao roa Vanasse FodN FI 33907 +ace mu + 941.931.4601 r 941.417.4636 F 4 eoac aeLC TON^7— A4_ gl_IdY'L-lldlplg�3�f�on.RI�o�ad L B+ Cua,olgl ypr VWI/IYIJIVII DaylO1 1001 T37.46i frail41.43 463 206 462ro sPiL, rt a4u5 FLUM Napk; FI 14103 EXHIBIT IY.0 941.403.0223 r941.263.5096 • vand .mu °TiR'u` wrx -08 -os Sheet No. of 1 G:\ProJe \808 \80885\GoldGateFLUM \80885- FLUM3pg.dwg, 11/13/20%4:12:28 PM, \\VarMav- er\\ \CANON \Print I PUD (GKE } MKS) ND SUBJECT SITE Legend Zoning Collier County Parcels Townsend Livingston Rd. IN Commerical Subdistrict W+E Location Map Showing Zoning 0 100 2SOO 400 Date: 04 -0505 ® Feet Ferguson Law Group, LLC 4625 Bonita Beach Road Bonita Springs, FL 34135 E Vanasse Urban Planning Landscape Architecture D ay I o r Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering Environmental Science It 366 Sources: Collier County PA It is the end user's responsibility to verity, the data contained hereon. EXHIBIT V.A.1 Project Number: 80885 FILE: \ \vanday_nasl \gis \Projects \800\808W0885\Exhibits \80885- loczone...d EXHIBIT V.A.2 FILE: EXHIBIT V.A.3 Project Number 8088! FILE: \ \vantlay_nasl \gis\ Projects \!Op\BOB\ 80885 \Exhibit s\80885- ELUZON. I UR PROPOSED ESTATES DESIGNATION, ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, TOWNSEND LIVINGSTON ROAD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT UR UR Legend UR = Urban Residential Subdistrict E = Golden Gate Estates Townsend Livingston Rd. Commerical Subdistrict Future Land Use Map 0 100 200 400 Date: 04 -05 -05 ® Feet Ferguson Law Group, LLC Bonita Springs, FL 34135 4625 Bonita Beach Road EXHIBIT V.B.1 LID Va n a s s e Urhan Planning lalduape Architecture ring D ay I o r Traf fic Engineering Environmental Science FL 366 Sources: Collier County PA It is the end user's responsibility to verify the data contained hereon. FILE : \ \vanday_nasl \gis \Projecls \800 "0 0885 \Exhibils\80885- flum.mxd ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway Property SEC 30, TWP 49S, RNG 26E COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA April 2005 Revised May 2006 Prepared By: TURRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC -- 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 EXHIBIT V.C.1 & V.C.2 Livingston Rd/GG Pkwy Property Sec. 30, Twp 49S, Rng26E, Collier County Environmental Assessment Revised May 15 (per Collier County Comments) INTRODUCTION This report documenting site conditions and environmental considerations has been prepared to address environmental submittal requirements for a Collier County Comprehensive Plan amendment application. The included information provides an environmental overview of the subject property, which is being considered for redevelopment. 1. Project Location The subject property is located at the northeast quadrant of the Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway intersection. The property is located in Section 30, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. The area investigated is composed of two parcels with existing residential structures and encompasses approximately 5 acres. The project location is depicted on the Location Map enclosed as Attachment 1. The approximate property boundaries are located on the enclosed aerial with FLUCFCS map overlain. This exhibit is enclosed as Attachment 2. 2. Soils Information According to the USDA Soil Survey of Collier County Florida, the entire site is composed of Oldsmar Fine Sand (Soil Unit 416). This is a non -hydric soil unit. A soils map and description are enclosed as Attachment 3. 3. FLUCCS Information Major vegetative communities were estimated based on photo interpretation of 2004 Collier County aerial photography. Ground truthing of these estimates was conducted in April of 2005 to verify the vegetation and to determine the extent (if any) of jurisdictional wetlands on site. The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) manual was used to classify the vegetation communities occurring within the site boundaries. While the entire site would be classified as low density residential development since the entire properties would be subject to those disturbances associated with the residences, (i.e. lights, mowing and clearing, noise, etc.) the properties have been further broken down to identify the remaining vegetation on the sites that is still present. Attachment 2 provides a FLUCCS map for the site that illustrates the FLUCCS codes and acreage for each community. A general description is provided below for each category along with any site - specific nuances that may be relevant to the assessment. Livingston Rd/GG Pkwy Property Sec. 30, Twp 49S, Rng26E, Collier County Environmental Assessment Revised Mav 1 5 /nor rnllier (`nnnhi (`nmmenrc\ FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACRES POTENTIAL .JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS ill Low-Density Residential 2.04 411 Pine Flatwoods 1.19 411 d Disturbed Pine Flatwoods 0.66 624(d) Disturbed Pine / Cypress 0.17 ROW Road Right of Way 1.09 TOTALS 15.15 Note: Acreage is approximate as no boundary survey was used to determine property extents or vegetative breaks. 111 — Low Density Residential - This category represents residential housing of less than two units per acre. Because the site already has existing structures on it, the vegetation observed is not entirely composed of any single habitat type. Landscape plants and materials are also scattered throughout the property. An existing house is located on one parcel while a storage building and work area is located on the other parcel. Access to both parcels is from driveways off of Livingston Road. The majority of vegetation on this site consists of cypress trees (Taxodium distichum), slash pine (Pious elliottii) and cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto). The understory is composed almost entirely of mown grasses. Little midstory is present but some wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and coco plum (Chrysobalanus icaco) are located around the house. 411 — Pine Flatwoods - This category represents the forested area at the northern end of the property. It is composed of a slash pine and cabbage palm canopy with one small area of earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). Midstory is almost completely Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) in concentrations from 25% to 75% of the strata. Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), grape vine (Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbriar (Smilax spp.) are also present. 411(d) — Disturbed Pine Flatwoods - This category was separated out from the above pine flatwoods because of the mowing that has occurred. Slash pine, cabbage palm, and a few cypress trees are present. Little midstory remains but some wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and coco plum (Chrysobalanus icaco) are present. 624(d) — Disturbed Cypress and Pine - This very small area in the south west corner of the property has also been impacted through the mowing and maintenance activities that have occurred. A few cypress (Taxodium distichum), slash pine ( Pious elliottii) and cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto) make up the canopy. As with the disturbed pine flatwood, little midstory remains. -- ROW — Road Right -of -Way — This area is the strip of land along Livingston Road. It is periodically mowed and has no canopy of midstory vegetation present. Livingston Rd/GG Pkwy Property Sec. 30, Twp 49S, Rng26E, Collier County Environmental Assessment Revised May 15 (per Collier County Comments) 4. Wetlands No formal jurisdictional determination has been verified with any regulatory agency, however, the non -hydric soil, lack of hydrological indicators, and presence of an existing residence would lead to the conclusion that there are no jurisdictional wetland areas on the project site. While the cypress trees are an indication that the site may have been wetter in the past, existing site conditions indicate that this is no longer the case. 5. Historical and /or Archaeological Information No historical or archaeological sites are known to exist on the subject property. Confirmation was been requested from the Division of Historical Resources Master Site file and will be provided to reviewers when it has been received. 6. Protected Species No protected species were observed during the field visits on the sits. Due to its close proximity to two major roadways and the existing residence and maintenance activities on the property, it was not expected that any listed species would be found. However, a preliminary survey was done with special emphasis placed on making observations of potential gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and indigo snake (Drymarchon corals couperi) utilization. The methodology and results of the site visits are presented below. Methodology Aerial photos and a preliminary FLUCCS map were consulted prior to arriving on -site and a system of meandering transects were conducted throughout the subject area. Since this is an already developed site, more time was spent in the forested areas at the north and south ends of the site. The entire site was inspected and observed in a series of field visits that included both walking along the roadway corridors and both walking and still observations within the wooded areas. Fieldwork took place in late March and early April of 2005 and a total of approximately 7.5 hours has been spent on site devoted to wildlife survey. A slow pace along walking transects was maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rootings, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks and scat were looked for and duly noted. All pine trees were examined for RCW cavities and squirrel nests or day beds. No RCW cavities, squirrel daybeds, or tortoise burrows were observed. Site Visits Livingston Rd/GG Pkwy Property Sec. 30, Twp 49S, Rng26E, Collier County Environmental Assessment Revised May 15 (per Collier County Comments) March 14, 2005 7:00 — 9:00 AM March 23, 2005 5:00 — 7:00 PM April 1, 2005 7:00 — 8:30 AM April 6, 2005 11:00 — 1:00 AM -PM Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name Birds Anhinga Snowy egret Cattle Egret White ibis Nighthawk Mourning Dove Red - bellied woodpecker Bluejay Cardinal Grackle* Red - shouldered hawk Black Vulture Mockingbird Unidentified warblers Reptiles & Amphibians Southern toad Green treefrog Brown anole Mammals Grey Squirrel Raccoon (tracks) Feral Cat Anhinga anhinga Egretta Chula Bubulcus ibis Eudocimus albus Chordeiles minor Zenaida macroura Melanerpes carolinus Cyanocitta cristata Cardinalis cardinalis Quiscalus quiscula Buteo lineatus Coragyps atratus Mimus polyglottos Bufo terrestris Hyla cinerea Anolis sagrei Sciurus carolinensis Procyon lotor Felis spp. Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. During the survey period no listed species and no evidence of any listed species was observed on the subject property. Livingston Rd/GG Pkwy Property Sec. 30, Twp 49S, Rng26E, Collier County Environmental Assessment Revised May 15 (per Collier County Comments) A list of species that would be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on -site and contiguous to the site and available background data. Sources include the Fish and Wildlife Service Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern and their Respective Community Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Mesic Slash Pine and Pine / Cypress Flatwoods Appendix C lists the following potential species within the community type Mesic Pine Flatwoods; Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus, *, ST), Sandhill crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Bald eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus, FT, ST), Red cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis, FE, ST), Audubons crested caracam (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo snake (Drymarchon corals couperi, FT, ST), Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus, ST), Eastern Beard grass skipper (Atryone arogos arogos, *). Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows; F = Federal SSC = Florida Species of Special Concern S = State C = Federal Candidate E = Endangered *= FWS Species of Management Concern T = Threatened R = Rare Summary The existing condition of the subject site is affected by its proximity to two heavily impacted, heavily traveled roadway corridors as well as the fact that there are existing buildings and activities occurring on the site. This has limited the area's viability as prime wildlife habitat. Development of the subject site is not expected to result in detrimental impacts to state or federally listed wildlife species, primarily because current use patterns, surrounding activities, and altered hydrology have reduced the sites' ability to support populations of listed species. r � r LO i S Ik ly llM» is 1 V {� r � r LO 1 V {� 1 � ak d:x 4 p I r � r �eetlo)IW�. 44 qp +b0+i ."siwq M0 �5 W99 M515 U09 d IlSL 4- E' k ^NIVmtl -MS 15 Wes( ay i3 _0 ry 0 J LL LL 0 W L� ,L V/ w A- y w ', Z tax,., ►v� sue° a 5Q G _Z U 00 8 w Y mpj O U) U)CO a� Z �O a� OU Z ,D„ �y w0 IL (r w OW W O n O W W Q z o a Z? Z� �O QQ Z W O� j? w Q H— U W O P Z F�a 3° °zv CO 2 W La N N La W �Wai z x f N N N a V 3 3 3 rc N 3 0 tim U W N � � V � � � � W \ ® \ - — , ° ` \ � . . � . § _ . ; ; • . _ -�| , |loll'. � * . . . . �• s ( _ � � V � � � � W MAY -25 -2005 10;03 P.02 0 v "Q F U 5�� • FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Sue M. Cobb Se _retary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES May 25, 2006 Ron Nino Vanasse & Daylor LLP 12730 New Brittany Blvd #600 Ft. Myers, FL 33907 Fax: (239) 437 -4601 Dear Mr. Nino: In response to your inquiry of May 25, 2006, tht! Florida Master Site File list; no previously recorded cultural resources in the following parcels: T49S, R26E, Section 30 In interpreting the results of our search, plea.ie remember the following points: • Areas which have not been completely surveyed, such as yours, may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, unrecorded historically important structures, or both. • As you may know, state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some projects. Record searches by the staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute such a review of cultural resources. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance Review Sectiot of the Bureau of Historic Preservation at 850- 245 -6333 or at this address. If you have any further questions concerning the Florida Master Site File, please contact us as below, Sincerely, Marie Celeste Ivory Archaeological Data Analyst, Florida Master Site File Division of Historical Resources R. A. Gray Building S00 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 Phone: 850.245 -6440, Fax: 850 -245 -6439 State SunCom: 205 -6440 Email: finsfile @dos..4aref.us Web: htip./ /wwll,.dosstate.fl,ra/dhr/rnsf/ 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, F1, 32399 -0250 . http: / /www.flheritage.com 0 r7frectofe Office (850) Dirac 0 a FAX: 245.6435 O Archaeological Research O Historic Preservation (850) 245 -6444 • FAX, 245 -6436 850 245 -6333 a Hlatoricaf Muaeuma O Palm Beach Re onal Office ( ) FAX: 243 437 (650) 245-6400 e FAX 245-733 (561) 279.1475 • FAX: 279.1476 0 51. Auguat:ne Regional Office O Tamp., Regional Office (904) 825.504;; a PAX A95_m,A TOTAL P.02 EXHIBIT V. D. 5 DATA & ANALYSIS TO SUPORT THE SUITABILITY OF THE LAND FOR THE PROPOSED USE Suitability of Land for Proposed Use Location Factors -The subject land lies on the northeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway (GGP) and Livingston Road (LR). Both of these roads are designated as arterials roads in the County's Highway classification System. This fact is pronounced, because residential land uses along such highway corridors, at this time six lanes wide by policy will be henceforth constrained. Vacant land along said constrained corridors when operating at maximum efficiency, are not likely to encourage residential development at densities consistent with one and two - family housing but rather will demand higher densities characteristic of multi - family, multi- storey housing. Certainly, the density limitation as reflected by the Estates land use designation of one dwelling unit for each 2.25 acres bears an unreasonable restriction on the property that invites a legal challenge. One cannot ignore the fact that that this portion of the Estates is no longer valid given the fact that the sections involved are today surrounded with urban designated land, that are moreover serviced with county water and sewer systems. While this does not argue by itself for a land use change to a commercial development it does nevertheless argue for a change that will permit an intensification of use similar to that of commercial. Existing Land Uses- The subject property is further impacted by the following existing land uses that further detract from low - density residential uses of the subject property: Directly west across Livingston Road - -A large FPL substation is located and the Grey Oaks PUD with a planned regional commercial center with an access road to Livingston Road. This will severally impact the quality of any residential development if that be the only alternative there is, and further argues for an intensifi cation of land uses at the N.E corner of LR and GGP. S.W Corner of LR & GGP- This area lies within the Grey Oaks PUD and all of the frontage on LR is specifically authorized for high density housing, either conventional or ALF. We fully expect that there will be constant pressure on the County to amend the Comprehensive Plan to allow non - residential development. S.E Corner of LR &GGP- This comer it should be noted is undeveloped and is characterized by a lake that may be a part of the water management facilities for LR. General Condition- The predominate uses along GGP are conditional uses that for all intent and purposes function like commercial uses. There are twenty (20) conditional use approvals allowing churches, fraternal organizations and health care facilities. This fact .lvmjecU18u15C88ACanp Plan AppWffilcalNn UOaFT V.dw calls Policy 5.2.3 into question as being extremely prejudicial and capricious relative to the remaining lots that do not currently enjoy a conditional use that has far greater economic value than would be conferred on property by an Estates zoning classification. Market Factors Potential Market Area Conditions A potential market area in support of commercial development would include the following subdivisions: Grey Oaks potential 1152 dwelling units (note this is one -half of authorized) Wyndemere potential 591 dwelling units Briarwood potential 800 dwelling units Livingston Village potential 590 dwelling units Estate Home sites (west of I -75) Estimate 250 home sites All of the above referenced PUD'S lie within 1.5 miles of the intersection of LR and GGP. While it is recognized that Grey Oaks could be evenly split between Airport Road and LR nevertheless that advises in excess of 2,900 potential dwelling units lie within 1.5 miles of said intersection. Planning literature dealing with corrunercial development standards advise that 1,500 dwelling units can support a neighborhood shopping center. (DiChiara and Koppleman). The potential market for commercial activity far exceeds the market conditions that support commercial development based simply on roof -tops. One cannot ignore the added market forces created by location at two arterial roads. Existing Commercial Concentrations The subject intersection lies within one mile of the Airport Road intersection with GGP. The N.W and N.E corners are commercially zoned, however the intensity and types of commerce allowed provide for regional serving commercial uses. Additionally, the intersection is extremely congested and would not encourage nearby residents to utilize commercial uses as convenience purchasing trips and should therefore not be counted on as satisfying the demand for neighborhood commercial uses. The only bona fide neigbborhood commercial facilities are located 2 to 3 miles east along the GGP on what is commonly referred to as the City of Golden Gate. This location is not consistent with market area standards for the residential development along LR that is the area most underserved at present for convenience shopping and services provided by professional and general offices. Other Factors In addition to the above considerations is the fact that LR functions as an arterial road and provides the main access to a one square mile area of industrial development, and the many hundreds of jobs located therein with its companion service delivery traffic, one half mile to the south of the intersection of GGP and LR. When added to the immediate and potential number of households that fall with one to two miles of the intersection of _. LR and GGP a market is created for local convenience goods and services, and office functions. fiP?DI0C!Sn80.M088SCanp Plan AppUonficxian E" NIBITV doc Io E IEI I:rs= N <GE P -NI U. T W E I „o�s I, - LOaI„� �.E o e1L s � _PINE RIDGE ROAD ❑ -. I�� m1 SCdfO: ]'- 4,000' LL I PINE RIDGE ROAD PIC PI 1 +i R �—�I r T .. -All _s � g i.wFS Pnt I Jk N'S I 2 Mile j a�llr !l u _ Radius L GREEN BOULEVARD -� it o O N W L F1 JIL�01i III Px E CE GOLDEN I IT�P j -. Z p 1.5 C . I I ¢ I {yam'✓ /�j� ��,P C .R. BBB). I GATE PARKWAY PROJECT T 11 E � d.. GL roil T' Z INTERSTATE -75 - U FElpPN N 1 5 Fl !I 5 CE ITEP P2pGEiIr I CCAVERLE - rdlcF t, Y I PgUc $ 1- NAPLPB °� puapE J RADIO D (C. R. 856) 33 AIRPORT E Tnew Inulcx II, I -cza ISL s I. s16uran00o _ —1I1PGPT "L111 Oa Pca,. <. P'Fr1 SFPING400 f P.Poor,PE 'APH FK 'RI OAVIS BOULEVARD o`T. LLLJJJ (S. R. 84) DAVIS BOULEVARD A (SR 847 IF b 7\ F,ER rN�z1 IP Tee Pnae $ P i� S NOPIP[N I'VEI OF WAPN YI�LACE POn Ao j EST, TI = s esr p I L i w, rEx Law�a Ilw - cu ,` � c u r6 cuNTr scnane n couPLe� I r T 2 II j �rxw¢rr N0' 11730 New Bnnanz Boulevard. Suice 600'1 vuvawn __ 80885 Vanasse ° r vacs nos — fon Myers, 6 1 7 Ferguson Lew 1f,1h LLC Townsend Livinpstw7 Road m un xo: r 941.471.4601 a 941.437.4676 4615 e��ao eoocn a000 Canmercial SUbdlstriot m 80885- Day I O r 3001 Tamiami Trail Nonh, Suia 106 Bm11, SP�I�gs Tf 34135 PUD Q. 1 ^_ Nagle:, Fl 34103 Exhibit V.0.5 na rx ev: r 941.403.0113 a 941.163.5096 Market Area Impact w vanday_mm % a sno.n vote, _, o4 -oe -os Sheet No.1 of E TR -2 COLLIER COUNTY 2025 LONG RANGE NEEDS PLAN 3 Z 1 au Rd LGF, A 0 g N L r 2 - Lanes AN - Lanes 1� / 6 - Lanes 8 - Lanes Interchanges F *Water Bodies V Interstate Highway Roads Q US Highway C-1 County Boundary sEi_"1 2 0 2 4 Miless V5 C of m m >R m a CR 858 m `m .a m n m `m n n w_ COLLIER BLVD n m X W p O > W Z oW a � � z O SANTA BARBARA BLVD i t■ ■ a ¢ LIVINGSTON RD j a p AIRPORT PULLING RD GOODLETTE RD N 3 m Wn a ° L b� 8E S a U Q N y � ~R � ` C d � U � N = W � 7 V C U GMP Amendment Co- 2005 -04 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial subdistrict EXHIBIT V.E. PUBLIC FACILITIES Public Facility Evaluations This evaluation is in response to question V of the application for a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Potable Water: The subject property lies within the Collier County Water Service area. The property will be served by the County's regional water treatments facilities, north and south plants. These treatment facilities currently have the capacity to meet the 7200 -gpd demand from this property. The Level of Service Standard (LOSS) is 185 gallons per capita (peak population) per day from the adopted 2003 Water Master Plan Update and verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) for the 2006 Lower West Water Supply Plan. The 2005 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR), Potable Water System- Treatment Facilities table at page 23 shows the County having in place adequate capacity to the year 2025. Water service is available at the site from a 12" water main located on the east side of Livingston Road. Utility construction will be designed, and constructed, and made subject to County requirements to provide service to the property. Notwithstanding concurrency requirements, it is understood that water transmission lines may be extended from a public source to and into the subject property and LOSS remain the function of government in response to any concurrency issues at the time of any application for final development order. Sewer Service: The subject property lies within the Collier County Sewer Service District. There is currently no public sewer service immediately available adjacent to the property. However, a new pump station and 8" force main system are under construction approximately 400 feet west of Livingston Road. The force main is an interconnect between the District's north and south regional treatment facilities. The north regional treatment facility will serve this property and currently has the capacity to accommodate the 6000 -gpd demand from this property. The Level of Service Standard (LOSS) is 145 gallons per capita (peak population) per day (gpcd) for the north service area based on the adopted 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update and verified by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The 2005 Annual Update Inventory Report, Wastewater System LOSS Assessment table at page 28 shows the County having in place sufficient capacity up to the year 2025. Utility construction will be designed and constructed and made subject to County requirements to provide service to the property. Notwithstanding concurrency requirements, it is understood that sanitary sewer collection lines may be extended from a public source to and into the subject property and LOSS remain the function of government in response to any concurrency issues at the time of any application for a final development order. 1 . IP ft, F,, GMP plp1EVP'B,T V E F,,d i,c GMP Amendment CO- 2005 -04 Toumsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Arterial & Collector Roads: The subject property lies on the northeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road. Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road are classified as Principal Urban Arterial Roads. Both of these arterial roads are six -lane highways and operate at acceptable LOS. Drainage: Drainage will be governed by SFWMD and/or Collier County. Drainage from the property will discharge into the County maintained channel MGG -01. The property is within the main Golden Gate Basin and has a maximum allowable discharge of 0.15 cfs /acre. Project designs will be consistent with SFWMD rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of storm water events by both on -site and off -site improvements. At the scale commensurate with the size of the subject property, site related drainage requirements are invoked at the time of development via the Site Development Approval process. Collier County regulations require on -site retention for a 25 -year 3 -day storm event, which has to be designed into the project master plan. Impervious area will not exceed two acres. This is unlikely to have any impact on adjoining property except under extreme rainfall conditions commensurate with a 100 - year storm event. Solid Waste: Waste Management of Collier County handles solid waste under agreement with Collier County. The County 2005 AUIR, LOSS tables at pages 39 and 41 advise that the County has sufficient landfill capacity up to the year 2027 for the 2 years of Lined Cell Capacity and 2028 for the 10 years of Permissible Landfill. No capacity issues exist at this time and no related LOSS will be abridged by this development under the current concurrency conditions or otherwise at expected buildout in 2008. Parks: Community and Regional: This evaluation is not applicable to non - residential projects. Schools: hiasmuch as the proposed subdistrict does not provide for any residential development, there will be no impact on school facilities. Fire Protection: The subject property lies within the East Naples Fire District. The nearest fire station is located on Airport Road at Poinciana. This location is about 1.5 road miles. Emergency Medical Services: Emergency medical services are provided by the Collier County Emergency Management agency from the station located at Poinciana and Airport Roads. The LOSS is 1 unit per 15,000 Population. The 2005 AUIR at page 93 advises that the County should not incur any deficiency until 2014 -15 without some additional compensating adjustments. There is no indication of a LOS deficiency associated with the County's ability to provide this service at this particular point in time. Additionally, it should be pointed out that the County does levy impact fees and these are supposed to address any potential LOSS condition that may arise from approval of any project. In any event, the application of Concurrency rules is a function of an approval to a final development order and should not be germane at the time of any consideration to amend the Future Land Use Plan Element. 1 P IFRix, "Up /+k,11Y"e1 T V kvsU." GMP Amendment CP- 2005 -04 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict EXHIBIT V. E. 1 (Revised 1125107) 5 -ACRE PARCEL NE CORNER — GOLDEN GATE PARKWAYILIVINGSTON ROAD Water Service: The subject property is located within the Collier County Water District boundary. The property will be served by the County's regional water treatment facilities, North and South Plants. The proposed 40,000 sf of commercial office development is estimated to generate a demand of approximately 6,000 gpd. This is based on 120% of the projected sewer service demand of 0.15 gpd/sf for 40,000 sf of office space. The County's treatment facilities currently have the capacity to meet the estimated 6,000 -gpd demand from this property. Water Service is available at the site from a 12" water main located on the east side of Livingston Road. Utility construction will be designed and constructed and made subject to County requirements to provide service to the property. Sewer Service: There is currently no public sewer service immediately adjacent to the site. However, a new pump station and 8" force main system was recently constructed approximately 400 feet west of Livingston Road. The force main is an interconnect between the District's North and South Regional Treatment Facilities, and has a capacity of approximately 2 million gallons per day to accommodate the interconnect. The North Regional Treatment Facility maximum daily capacity is currently being expanded from 17.6 mgd to 24.1 mgd. There is presently sufficient treatment capacity to serve the anticipated 6,000 -gpd demand from this property. The estimated demand is based on 40,000 sf of office space at 0.15 gpd /s£ Utility construction will be designed and constructed and made subject to County requirements to provide service to the property. Drainage: Drainage will be governed by SFWMD and/or Collier County. The property drainage will discharge into the County maintained channel MGG -01. The property is within the Main Golden Gate Basin and has a maximum allowable discharge of 0.15 -cfs /acre. Project designs will be consistent with SFWMD rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of storm water events by both on -site and off -site improvements. Solid Waste: Waste Management of Collier County handles solid waste as authorized by Collier County. No capacity issues exist at this time and no related LOS will be abridged by this development under the current concurrency condition. II"" 1M".a MP1;df I, S, lr,ltF,1 i...c. <• s 1 .. fr` f \ ♦ I l � .. 1 1 111{ E8O811j��l 13730 Men Id? 9oulmrd, Suite 600 IMM. roei Va n as s e fon Mren, FI 313% Ferguson Law Grom PLC Townsend Livingston Road 94 .431.46D 1941.437.9676 x615 Bmrn Roof Commercial Subdistrict �ay�Or 3001 ,am. Trail Moth, Sit. 306 EXiS( Water Lansrrussion'S Stem asa-R Maples, FI 34103 and Proposed l/narovemeots 1 941903.0273 1941163.5096 i ` - • randar.mm � a: sno.n o<�oe -os Sheet No. 1 of I EXHIBIT VE1 6 bro eets\80a\ 80885 \Plannr pT0885 -0dete0,,.0a9, Onry920p5 OP'.59:59 PM y r _L 1 S ♦ } a , 1s.n �» »Iaw1` S i1 2�� 4e�iwwruur «I «t I T' ere r I ^41 i r' C. L. fk '' A-P�Mij Ali 9 *AA eta r PCT 1 , TE- i INSET F'r;'C':EC Scale: l' -6000' 'd� ; evlir <• s 1 .. fr` f \ ♦ I l � .. 1 1 111{ E8O811j��l 13730 Men Id? 9oulmrd, Suite 600 IMM. roei Va n as s e fon Mren, FI 313% Ferguson Law Grom PLC Townsend Livingston Road 94 .431.46D 1941.437.9676 x615 Bmrn Roof Commercial Subdistrict �ay�Or 3001 ,am. Trail Moth, Sit. 306 EXiS( Water Lansrrussion'S Stem asa-R Maples, FI 34103 and Proposed l/narovemeots 1 941903.0273 1941163.5096 i ` - • randar.mm � a: sno.n o<�oe -os Sheet No. 1 of I EXHIBIT VE1 6 bro eets\80a\ 80885 \Plannr pT0885 -0dete0,,.0a9, Onry920p5 OP'.59:59 PM - 1 I <. 1 X < � � Y s 7 -T Pr-- w -2x Y« ». wiw 14 Pr { NORTH SERVICE rAREA i CT-SA n.,n Jt y ♦ ){ i E;IIRf - �1•I»� iYNiNI SERVICE - r _ AREA ,a Y T .r MwYNwif •iNIN »iTNI ' Y f 1f ! 5 i ✓� a 'OFFr . ;AND.",.... i11f I k P�FR" N0' 80885 Vanasse 12130 Xew BrimsYY Boulevard. Suice 600 fon Myers, FI 33901 ue hR• 80885 — VosfeWoterjp � Da ys 1 + r941.431.4601 r94L431.4636 3001 iamiami frail XortM1, Suite 206 Naples, FI 34103 o ev: RFo MJ r 941.4030223 r94 L263.5096 _— o \wojecls180a1 oss5 \Plenn,n,1ac865 -Waste We�erjig.Mg, M/19200543'.000] FM Ae emrF s 7 -T Pr-- w -2x Y« ». wiw 14 Pr { NORTH SERVICE rAREA i CT-SA n.,n Jt y ♦ ){ i E;IIRf - �1•I»� iYNiNI SERVICE - r _ AREA ,a Y T .r MwYNwif •iNIN »iTNI ' Y f 1f ! 5 i ✓� a 'OFFr . ;AND.",.... i11f I k P�FR" N0' 80885 Vanasse 12130 Xew BrimsYY Boulevard. Suice 600 fon Myers, FI 33901 ue hR• 80885 — VosfeWoterjp � Da ys 1 + r941.431.4601 r94L431.4636 3001 iamiami frail XortM1, Suite 206 Naples, FI 34103 o ev: RFo MJ r 941.4030223 r94 L263.5096 _— o \wojecls180a1 oss5 \Plenn,n,1ac865 -Waste We�erjig.Mg, M/19200543'.000] FM t PRRPARLD FOR: Ferguson Law Group LLC 4625 BOOF, BaacA Raad BonBa S,", FL J4;35 • ,J 1 4' >s Krr (GAt EVSET Scale. 1'— 6000' N W O E 0 S Scale., 1' -2 mi. PICF . — Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Existing Wastewater Tranw asion System and Prop. i Proposed improvements Sheet .No. l of 1 EXHIBIT V.EIB Vanasse Daylor COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LEVEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT TOWNSEND LIVINGSTON ROAD MERCIAL SUBD April 14, 2005 Revised January 29, 2007 Livingston Road & Golden Gate Parkway Collier County, Florida Prepared For: Mr. & Mrs. Joseph E. Townsend C/o Mr. Timothy Ferguson 4265 Bonita Beach Road Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Job # 80885.05 CT Prepared By: Vanasse & Daylor UP 12730 New Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600, Fort Myers, Florida 33907 t 239.431.4601 F 239.431.4636 w vanday.conn STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC IMPACTS TATEMENT has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Ernest R. Spradling P.E. Florida Registration #61235 VanasseDaylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 (239) 437 -4601 Collaborators Reed K. Jarvi, A E. Marc A. Cioffr, E. L ERNEST R. SPRADLING JAN 2 9 2007 P.E. 61235 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Certification Statement Project Number: 80885 FILE: \ \vanday_nasl\Bis�Miect5M01808\ 80885\ ahibits180886aer -Ioc.m d Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Location Map and Study Area and Studied Intersections .............................................................. ............................... SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................... ..............................1 1 PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENT Peak Hour Projected Total Traffic ...................................................................... ............................... EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE 2 ............................................................................. ..............................2 Significance Test AREACONDITIONS Link LOS Results ..................................................................................... ............................... SITEACCESSIBILITY 2 ........................................................................................................... ..............................2 AreaRoadway System ........................................................................................................... ..............................2 Committed Roadway Improvements ...................................................................................... ..............................3 TRIPGENERATION ..................................................................................... ............................... TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT 3 ......................................................................... ..............................3 Projected Background and Total Traffic volumes ................................................................ ..............................4 ANALYSES................................................................................................... ............................... CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE 5 ................................................................................ ..............................5 LinkAnal yses ........................................................................................................................ ............................... SignificanceTest Analyses ................................................................................................... 5 5 ............................... Unsignalized Intersection Analyses ...................................................................................... 6 ............................... TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AREA CONSIDERATIONS ... ..............................8 SITEACCESS ......................................................................................................................... ..............................9 IMPROVEMENTANALYSES ................................................................ ............................... IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE NON SITE - GENERATED TRAFFIC 9 ............... ..............................9 IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE SITE - GENERATED TRAFFIC ....................... .............................10 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Location Map and Study Area and Studied Intersections Exhibit 2 Site - generated Trip Assignments Exhibit 3 Peak Hour Projected Total Traffic List of Tables Table 1 Site - generated Trip Estimates Table 2 Site - generated Trip Distribution Table 3 Link - specific Background Traffic Data Table 3a Projected Directional Peak Hour Volumes Table 4 Significance Test Table 5 Link LOS Results Table 6 Unsignalized Intersection Analysis Results List of Appendices Appendix Traffic Data and Analyses Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict i Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Vanasse & Daylor LLP (VanasseDaylor) is providing this Traffic Impact Statement for the Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development. The purpose of this study is to provide Collier County with sufficient information to assure that traffic- related impacts are anticipated and that effective mitigation measures are identified for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development is located on the northeast corner of the Livingston Road (CR 881) & Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) intersection in northern Collier County (see Exhibit 1). The proposed Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development may consist of up to 40,000 sq ft of commercial (office) uses on a 5 -acre parcel. Two accesses are contemplated for the site, consisting of one Right - in/Right -out (RURO) access on Livingston Road and one RURO access on Golden Gate Parkway. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No roadway or intersection improvements were identified as being needed in order to accommodate the background traffic. No roadway or intersection improvements, other than right turn lanes at the site accesses, were identified as being needed in order to accommodate the site - generated traffic. The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the proposed project. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 1 I:\ Projects\ 808 \80885 \Tlffic\80885CPTIS02.doc PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE The Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development is located on the northeast corner of the Livingston Road (CR 881) & Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) intersection in northern Collier County (see Exhibit 1). The proposed Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development may consist of up to 40,000 sq ft of commercial (office) uses on a 5 -acre parcel. Two single - family residential dwelling units currently occupy the site. Two accesses are contemplated for the site, consisting of one Right- in/Right -out (RI/R0) access on Livingston Road approximately 670 ft north of Golden Gate Parkway, and one RI/RO access on Golden Gate Parkway approximately 340 ft east of Livingston Road. The Livingston Road access will replace the two existing single - family driveways. The development will likely be completed before the 2008 Peak Season. This application is for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval. AREA CONDITIONS SITE ACCESSIBILITY Area Roadway System The description of the existing environment of the site and the surrounding study area, as well as the committed improvements, provides a basis for the analysis of the build -out alternative that provides a determination of the proposed project impacts. The study area for this development was determined to be Livingston Road north and south of the main access. Livingston Road (CR 88 1) Livingston Road in the study area is a north -south arterial under county jurisdiction. CR 881 has a speed limit of 45 mph. It is a recently constructed six -lane divided highway connecting Immokalee Road to Bonita Beach Road in Lee County. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 2 I:\ Projects\ 808 \80885 \TraffiC\80885CPTIS02.doc Golden Gate Parkway CR 886) Golden Gate Parkway in the study area is an east -west arterial under county jurisdiction. CR 886 has a speed limit of 45 mph. It is a four -lane divided highway that connects the City of Naples to Collier Boulevard (CR 951). A six -lane widening project is underway between Airport Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Committed Roadway Improvements No further committed improvements in the study area were found. TRIP GENERATION The potential number of site - generated trips was estimated using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation (7`h Edition) and the previously presented land development program. The trip generation equations shown below were used for this report. Office (LU 710): ADT: T = 1 1.01 (X) AM Peak Hour: T = 1.55 (X) PM Peak Hour: T = 1.49 (X) The above equations were used, with the land use data provided, to generate the estimated trips for the project as shown in Table 1. The Office average rates were used because of the small development size, as recommended by Trip Generation. Table I Site - generated Trip Estimates AM PEAK PM PEAK Land Use ADT Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Office (LU 710) 40,000 SF 440 62 55 7 60 10 50 Total Trips 40,000 SF 440 62 55 7 60 10 SO TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the _ information on the area and as directed by Collier County staff. The site - generated trip distribution is shown in Table 2. Since the site accesses are proposed as RI/RO accesses, all Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 3 I:\ Projects\ 808 \80885 \Traffic \80885CPTIS02.doc exiting trips were assigned to northbound Livingston Road and westbound Golden Gate Parkway to U -turn at the nearest available median openings. Recognizing that insufficient distance is available between the proposed site access and the nearest downstream median openings, the U- turning trips were assigned to the next downstream median opening on Golden Gate approximately 1,600 ft west of Livingston Road on Golden Gate Parkway and 3,200 ft north of Golden Gate on Livingston. Exhibit 2 presents the trip assignment on the roadway network. Table 2 Site - generated Trip Distribution PM Peak Link Percent Total Enter Exit Livingston Rd N of Golden Gate Pkwy 25% 14 2 12 Livingston Rd 5 of Golden Gate Pkwy 25% 16 3 13 Golden Gate Pkwy E of Livingston Rd 25% 14 2 12 Golden Gate Pkwy W of Livingston Rd 25% 16 3 13 Totals 60 10 50 Projected Background and Total Traffic Volumes VanasseDaylor reviewed available data and model projections to estimate background and future traffic volumes for the study area. Background traffic volumes were developed using multiple sources. Specific Link volume data for Immokalee Road were provided by the Collier County Transportation Department. These link volumes consisted of recorded 2006 directional Peak Hour volumes and "banked" trips that were assigned to the links for previously approved developments (see Appendix Collier County Concurrence Segment Table dated 1012512006). This is the methodology that is currently in use by Collier County for tracking the availability of reserve capacity on specific roadway links as part of their concurrency management efforts. Table 3 presents the link- specific background traffic data. Table 3 Link - specific Background Traffic Data Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 4 1:1Projecu\ 808 \80885 \Traffck80885CPTIS02.doc LOS_ P.PK NR TRIP_ Io REm NAME FROM IQ CAPY LANES SM YQL BANK Y41 CAE Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 4,000 6 E 1,370 502 1,872 2,128 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 4,000 6 E 1,260 223 1,483 2,517 Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road 1 -75 4,370 6 E 2,060 270 2,330 2,040 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 4 1:1Projecu\ 808 \80885 \Traffck80885CPTIS02.doc Growth projections were computed using the Collier County 2004 Average Daily Traffic & 2005 Average Daily Traffic reports (see Appendix). Growth rates were computed and applied to the directional peak hour volumes from Table 3 to estimate 2008 projected volumes. Since Livingston Road is a new corridor without sufficient historical count data to derive solid growth projections, a 6 percent growth rate, similar to Airport Road in 2003, was used. The results are shown in Table 3a. Exhibit 3 shows the AM and PM Peak Hour Total traffic counts. Table 3a Projected Directional Peak Hour Volumes NAME FROM TO 2000 2 04 2005 D Growth Rate 22� 2008 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 14,578 33,209 NB 0.55 6.0% 1,872 2,100 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 5,192 29,759 SB 1,532 1,720 0.55 Na 6.0% 1.483 1,670 Golden Gate Parkway Airport: Road 1 -75 28,022 29,836 5B 1,213 1,360 0.72 BB 1.6% 2,330 2,400 WB 906 930 Since Livingston Road was a new corridor in 2003, the growth rates were too high to be considered realistic. A 6 percent growth rate, similar to that recorded at Airport Road was used. ANALYSES CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Link Analyses The directional split of new trips was applied to the site - generated traffic volumes to determine the site - generated vehicle trips assignment. The site - generated vehicle -trip assignments were added to the background traffic volume networks to determine the Buildout traffic volume conditions. Link Levels of Service were evaluated for both Background and Total Traffic conditions. The 10 Month Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volumes (the Maximum Service Flowrates SF„e,,) for Livingston Road were provided by the Collier County Transportation Planning Department with the AUIR dated September 29, 2006 and the Concurrency Segment Data. Copies of these data are contained in Appendix. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 5 I: \Projects\ 808 \80885 \Traffic \80885CPTIS02.doc Significance Test Analyses According to Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.15.6.4.3: "Significance Test: Impact for the impact traffic analysis purposes for a proposed development project will be considered significant: 1. on those roadway segments directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or greater than 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; 2. for those roadway segments immediately adjacent to segments which are directly accessed by the project where project traffic is greater than or equal to 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; or 3. for all other adjacent segments where the project traffic is greater than 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segments using the above standards, the development's impact is not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments." In other words, a project will have a significant and adverse impact on a state or regionally significant roadway only if both of the following criteria are met: (1) the project will utilize 3 percent or more of the maximum peak hour service volume at the adopted level of service standard for the adjacent and next to adjacent link, 5 percent for the other links; and (2) the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted level of service standard. Significance was estimated according to Collier County's 3/3/5 rule, and the links were evaluated to determine whether projected operation would be within County standards. The data resources used for this analysis are shown in Appendix. Table 4 presents the significance test analysis for the PM Peak Hour. The analysis clearly shows that the proposed Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development site - generated trip estimates are less than the 3% on Livingston Road, indicating that the development will not significantly impact the adjacent roadway network. The analyses also clearly show that evaluation of operations at the Livingston Road & Golden Gate Parkway intersection is unnecessary. Table 4 Significance Test Site Site as pct of Link SF MAX TrT iK !F MAX Livingston Rd N of Golden Gate Pkwy 4,000 25 0.6% Livingston Rd S of Golden Gate Pkwy 4,000 3 0.1% Golden Gate Pkwy E of Livingston Rd 4,370 12 0.3% Golden Gate Pkwy W of Livingston Rd 4,370 Is 0,3% Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 6 I: \Proje s\808 \80885 \Traffic\80885CPTIS02.doc Table 5 presents the Link LOS analytical results. The analysis shows the estimated site - generated trips will not adversely impact the adjacent roadway link. All roadway segments are operating within the SF,,�. Table 5 Link LOS Results Win SF,x? Link BKGD Site Total SFm� BKGD Total Livingston Rd N of Golden Gate Pkwy 1,100 25 2,125 4,000 Y Y Livingston Rd S of Golden Gate Pkwy 1,670 3 1,673 4,000 Y Y Golden Gate Pkwy E of Livingston Rd 2,400 12 2,412 4,370 Y Y Golden Gate Pkwy W of Livingston Rd 2,400 IS 2,415 4,370 Y Y Unsignalized Intersection Analyses Vanasse & Daylor analyzed the unsignalized intersection at the R1/R0 accesses to determine the PM Peak Hour LOS for total traffic conditions using SYNCHRO 6.0® computer modeling software. Default Peak Hour and Heavy Vehicle factors were used to adjust the traffic characteristics. See the Appendix for the SYNCHRO 6.0® computer printouts. Table 6 summarizes the unsignalized intersection analysis results. These intersection analyses indicate that acceptable operations can be expected under Buildout Year total traffic conditions at the Livingston Road & Main Access. Table 6 Unsignalized Intersection Analysis Results Intersection Mov't LOS /Delay Livingston Road Access WEIR 0116 Golden Gate Parkway Access SBR B/I I The unsignalized intersection analyses clearly indicated that the right turn movements of the side - street STOP - controlled intersections are projected to operate at acceptable service levels using the proposed lane configuration (Right- in/Right -out). No further action is needed. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 7 I: \Projects\ 808 \80885 \Tra(8c \80885CPTIS02.dcc TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AREA CONSIDERATIONS The Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development is located in the northeast corner of the Livingston Road & Golden Gate Parkway intersection in Collier County. This project is in the East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA -see Appendix). In accordance to the Collier County Land Development Code Section 6.02, "to maintain concurrency, each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its north -south lane miles and 85% of its east - west lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the Growth Management Plan Transportation Element. If any Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for a proposed development indicates that fewer than 85% of the lane miles in a TCMA are achieving the LOS standards indicated above, the proposed development shall not be permitted where such condition occurs unless modification of the development is made sufficient to maintain the LOS standard for the TCMA, or the facilities required to maintain the TCMA LOS standard are committed utilizing the standards for committed improvements in Policy 1.5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element of the GMP. Additionally, in order to be exempt from link- specific concurrency, new or redeveloping commercial developments must utilize at least two of ten possible Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies. The TDM strategies are intended reduce single - occupant vehicle use by such measures as enhancing transit ridership, encourage carpooling, or using revised work schedules. A preliminary discussion with Collier County staff concerning the sufficiency of the north -south and east -west lane miles within the East Central TCMA found that more than 85% of the lane miles meet LOS standards. Also, the Significance and Link LOS analyses clearly indicated that the site - related trips are projected to neither significantly nor adversely impact the adjacent roadway network. The Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict project is not expected to significantly impact roadway segments within the East Central TCMA; further over 85% of the lane miles are maintained at LOS standards. No further action is needed at this time. Further analyses, if necessary, will be conducted at the appropriate site development phase. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 8 I: \Projects\ 808 \808851TraKic\80885CPTIS02.doc SITE ACCESS Site access analyses were completed and projected queue lengths (storage lengths) were determined utilizing SYNCHRO 6.00 computer modeling software, which is based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000). The purpose of these analyses is to evaluate the operational characteristics and needs of the site accesses, and to recommend point locations. The Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Development will use two accesses. One RURO access will connect to Livingston Road approximately 670 ft north of Golden Gate Parkway, and the other RI/RO access will connect to Golden Gate Parkway about 340 ft east of Livingston Road. According to the Collier County turn lane regulations, all accesses on multi- lane highways shall be furnished with right turn lanes. In order to provide a safe and comfortable stop maneuver from highway speeds, deceleration lengths are required. Minimum deceleration lengths including taper must comply with FDOT Index 301. The FDOT Index 301 and Figure 3 -15 of the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards were used for conceptual geometric design (see Appendix). According to the FDOT Index 301, the deceleration lane length for a 45 mph design speed is 185 feet. Since Collier County uses the roadway posted speed as the turn lane design speed, the turn lanes at the site accesses should have 185 -foot deceleration lanes in addition to the applicable storage lanes. The SYNCHRO queuing analyses indicate that a minimal 50 ll storage lane will be adequate for both of the proposed right turn lanes. Right turn lanes at the site accesses should therefore be at least 235 ft long. IMPROVEMENT ANALYSES Because many of the analyses were addressed in a previous section, this improvement analysis section will be limited in scope to a conclusive narrative. IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE NON SITE - GENERATED TRAFFIC No roadway or intersection improvements were identified as being needed in order to accommodate the background traffic. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 9 I:\ Projects\ 808 \80885 \Traffic \80885cPTIS02.doc IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE SITE - GENERATED TRAFFIC No roadway or intersection improvements, other than right turn lanes at the site accesses, were identified as being needed in order to accommodate the site - generated traffic. The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the proposed project. Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict 10 I:\Projects\808 \80885 \Traffic \80885CPTI502.doc N I A RR m. ,0885 ao soeas - ns I Urban Planning t ar E anasse Inndsnpe Arzhiknn Enviranmenl Civil Enginnring D ay I o r 12130 Me. Bnn-I BeW-M S. 600 ion Mieo, Fl 33902 e 239.112,4601 x119.43)4636 G:\proj.M \808 \80885 \Traffic \nS \15t_Sub \80885- TIS.dw , 1/26/2007 4:01:06 PM, HPENG.pcB olps n, Law TOWN&WD LMNWTON RD. F X826 Barth B GmIWA DLO COMMERM &A D1M OT Bards mb BI Fl SRm SITE - BMNERATM TRIP ASSK,v kVM PM PEAK ME N AA I iUrban Planning iraflic Fnginnring IandrnpeArchitMure EavironmentalSderc aw"am Fer�ueanLawc> LLC TOWN3END LMNOSTON RQ [Nil Engineering FL 366 mo g�. mron7 aodmre, s�io- 6W a �� Rid BdIUe 8pf1'Fyq R 941$1K� CDMMERM SUBDISTRICT fon n1en FI 13907 eRaw TOTAL TRAFM r211'37.16U1 r219.41 636 • ra ^6° �mn N.lS 04 —OS -0.5 EXHIBIT G: \projects \808 \80885 \T,.Mn T2S \ISt_Sab \80885- TIS.dwg, 1/26/2007 3:58:03 PM, HPENG.pc3 APPENDIX • Concurrency Segment Tables dated October 25, 2006 Collier County 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report dated September 29, 2006 2004 Average Daily Traffic Tables • 2005 Average Daily Traffic Tables ■ FDOT Standard Index 301 ■ SYNCHROO 6.0 Analyses Townsend Livingston Road Commercial subdistrict Appendix ConcSegments_ 7 0_25_06.xls 1 59 New Market Road 61 Camp Keais Broward S(reel Jl S' 29 010 2fD 430 47, . CR 858 0 3 T '. 333 1 62, Old US 41 e .__ _.__ ee County Line US 4 7 ."10-j- ¢ _.v .4..� c 2 D 780 _ _ �.- ..__ „ 1 63 Seagate Drive 1 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach 2460 4'D 1870 387 2257L 203 6+E 1 64. Pine Ridge Road US 41� . 1 2 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach P ne Ridge Road j 3970 �~ 2340 527 2867+ 11031 � .. __.... Gootlletle Frank ...__,.,.._._. S ay Street + 3A Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate 3830 6iE 2210 523 2733 1097 ._._� A ,,crt Road 3730 6 E 2760 392 4 Airport Road Golden Gate Raflo Road 3230p 6T 2620 269 2889 341 5 Airport Road Radw Road Davis Boulevard _ 4100 6 2370 240 2610 1490 6 Airport Road Davis Boulevard US 47� 2580 &E 1930 211 2141 439 7 Bayshore Dnve US 47 Tnomasson Onve - 7950 '_4_"6—_-- D 740' 55 795 11551 1 1 0 County Barn Road Davis Boulevard Ra lesnake 860 44D 690 234' 9361 v, 11 CR 29 US 41 Cnokoloskee Island; �N) 88751 3� 181 4� 185 690 12 Davis Boulevard 13 Daws Boulevard 1 US 41 I Airport Road .2�_D_�_. Airport Road 342,0_ 6+E 1950+ 1504 2100k 13201 Lakewood 2080 4 D 1930 1071_ 20371 43 14 Davis Boulevard .... ........., Lakewood d Boulevar County Barn Road a.-... ......_ 2430 4 D 1930 235' 2165 265 15 Davis Boulevard 16 Daws Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara ,._ _..�....... 2400r 4 D 1860 514 23744 26 .Santa Barbara Colher Boulevard 1 1530 2 D 1120 508 16 -981 17 Golden Gate Collier Boulevard Wdson Boulevard i 2350 4iD i 1240 278 1518' 8321 1 ° 18 Golden Gate 19 Golden Gate US 47 Gootlletle Frank , Gootlletle -Frank 3180 _61 1200 76 1276 19041 Arport Road j 4350 6'E � 2670 171 - 2841; 1509 20 Golden Gate (Airport Road 1 -75 4370 6'E 2060' 270, 2330 2040 21 Golden Gate 1-75 Santa Barbara 7 373o- 6 2070: 169 2239. 1497 1 22 Golden Gate Santa Barbara Collier Boulevard }E 1980 4{D 1750 182, 1932 461 1 _ 23 Goodlette Frank 24 Goodlette mmokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach „ 90 2 D 630 157 787 4031 6 Frank Vanderbilt Beach Pine Ridge Road 2790h D� 1160, 13371 14531 25 Gootlletle Frank 26 Goodlette Frank Tine Ridge Road Golden Gate Golden Gate —f US 41 - 3420 6�E 1460 280 1740+ 1680 L _ 3500 &E 1850 115 1965 1535 27 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Collier Boulevard 1040 2 D 680 39 7191 29 Gulfshore Drve Th Avenue Vznderbilt Beach # 530 2 0 ( 25U� 16 266 30 Collier Boulevard 31 Collier Boulevard - - IM Immokalee Road Golden Gate Golden Gate t Green Blvd ^ --- 3300 6 E 1010; 932- 1942 1358 - 3300 6 E� 1680 678- 32 Collier Boulevard Green Boulevartl 2358' 942 „22604 D I 170 € 4 147_ 600, 2070 7901 33 Colhe /Boulevard 1-7S 'Davy Dans Boulevard 36906E 3300 598 3898 208 ». 34 CollierBOUlevard Boulevard Rattlesnake 3270 6 E 1850 5551 2405 8651 35 Collier Boulevard 36 SR 951 1Rattlesnake WS 41 US 41 f tanatee Road 33301 6E 1730^ 8144 2544! �m 197 4 D 1850' 352, 2202 232 37 SR 951 'Manatee Road I lz Dr �' �rt 4 ' 38 nsail 2590 D 1510 286` 1796+ ,7941 It SR 951 I Mainsail Dr Marco Island Bri 2480 40 1500 51 1505 975 1 39 111th Avenue N Gulfshore Drive Vartlerbdl Dnve TM7 2TD�A 350 22i 372 388 40 117th Avenue N 41 Immokalee Vanderbilt Drive - US 41 W 1040 2 ED 770t 8588 1821 Road US 41� A port Road 3030 6 E 2000 56 1 469 1 42 Immokalee Road 43 Immokalee Road Airport Road 75 3290( 6 E 2290Y 697 2987 3031 1 75 - Logan Boulevard 4370 2130, 1501 36313 7391 44 Immokalee Road I 45 Immokalee Roatl Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulvar ed - wilson Boulevard 1 O I Well Road 3790, E 1100 697 179T 1993 7 36704 6,E 12801 w 593 1873` 79 46 Immokalee Road OII Well Road Ei rglades 860i 2iD 2204 146 366 494 1 47 Lake Trafford Road 1 48 Logan Boulevard :West of SR 29 Vanderbilt Beach _ SP 29 m P e Ridge Road �. 875§ D 330� 7+ 3374 5381 990 2 D 430' 72 557 4331 49 Logan Boulevartl _. Pine Ridge Road G en Boulevard 1220} 201r 1421 6491 5'1'L ivingston ROad Impenal Street � kalee Road _ 3260 6. D 570 156 726 2534 52 Livingston Roatl Immokalee Road Va derbilt Beach { 3890} 6 E 1000" 61L 1061 28291 1 53 Livingston Road :Vanderbilt Beach Rne Ridge Road ,,, 3890 6 E 1 000 38Y 381 2509 14- 54 Livi,n stop Road Pine Ridge Road G, cen Gate i 4000; 6. E 1370^ 502+ 1872 2128 ivingslon cad 50 1 1 �GOltlen Gate Ratio Road 4000 6.E 1260; 223' 1483 2517 1 59 New Market Road 61 Camp Keais Broward S(reel Jl S' 29 010 2fD 430 47, . CR 858 Icmokalee Road 860 2.D 130 203 333 1 62, Old US 41 e .__ _.__ ee County Line US 4 7 ."10-j- ¢ _.v .4..� c 2 D 780 _ _ �.- ..__ „ 1 63 Seagate Drive _ _. Crayon Road US 7 70 1620 4'D 930 68 850 998 1 64. Pine Ridge Road US 41� . G,rclette Frank 1 2730 6E 2010 229 2239 ._ 1 65 Pine Ridge Road . .. __.... Gootlletle Frank ...__,.,.._._. S ay Street + ,_.,, ....p. .�..._ # 3300 6 E 2760 365 ... 3125 .... 1 66 Pine Ridge Road Shirley, §creel ._._� A ,,crt Road 3730 6 E 2760 392 3152 +m. I: \OHic %DepartmentslTraffc \Collier Couny\Reserve Capacity \20061ConcSegments_10_25_06.xls �y 3 z e a3 5 IIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I� '��IIIIIII7�IIIII�IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIB11101111111111111119111111111111 1111111191911111111111111111119111911111111111111111111111 I I I I I I I I I 1 011111111111111111 I I I I I i l l l l I@ 1 11111111191111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII01111111111111111111111 11111010101 11 1111111 @101 @1@18110 1011 @101110101 @10111 11 11111111911111919111111101111111�I1111111111111110111 �11��1111111101119111110111 UNION 11 Illlllll 111911111119111 M@ �0IUM�I�0��I��I��I�� 111111111191111111111111111111111191111111111111 " 11111/111 10111010109010111 @10909090911�10101090E 10111119010109010119 B BIBIBI01010101011111010181111 BIBIIBIIBI01111101011111 x ?sy ?F9. f21;' s S Collier County Average Dally Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History & Listed Alphabetically) _ I Sta. T` Location 2000 ADT 1 2001 ADT 2002 ADT 2003 ADT 2004 ADT Change 03 04 657 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Lely Cultural Blvd 21,919 25,349 25,016 26,284 29,365 11.72% 6ier Blvd (CR 951) south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 24,247 26,583 27,713 27,928 31,462 12.65% ier Blvd (CR 951) south of US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail) 29,346 33,422 34,286 34,132 35,556 4.17% er Blvd (SR 951) east of Bald Eagle Dr (CR 953) 16,504 19,446 18,995 18,914 20,627 9.06% er Blvd (SR 951) north of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 15,775 16,230 17,721 16,656 18,348 10.16% er Blvd (SR 951) north of Winterberry Dr 9,990 12,271 12,464 12,627 13,056 3.40% er Blvd (SR 951) south of Capri Blvd (CR 952) 22,927 25,399 26,386 26,17 8 27,814 6.25% 556 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Marco Bridge (Jolley Bridge) 22,422 25,689 28,493 26,271 27,743 5.60% 716 S Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 15,951 16,311 17,335 17,951 18,885 5.20% 710 S Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Winterberry Dr 10,655 10,192 10,818 11,160 11,035 -1.12% 623 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) west of Bald Eagle Dr (CR 953) 18,123 19,958 22,664 21,281 23,519 10.52% 520 Q County Barn Rd north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 10,644 10,968 11,266 11,354 11,474 1.05% 641 A County Barn Rd south of CC R &B Facility 16,171 17,106 14,954 15,005 0 •100.00% 519 Q County Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 14,005 13,775 13,863 14,124 13,837 -2.03% 559 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 27,112 30,590 31,084 30,183 30,798 2.04% 558 Q I Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 28,532 33,665 33,104 32,686 33,942 3.841% 601 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 21,058 22,830 22,726 22,920 25,969 13.31% 560 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Radio Rd (CR 856) 11,763 13,747 14,122 14,200 14,965 5.39% 538 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 27,321 31,917 31,000 30,789 32,561 5.76% ,338 A Desoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 929 846 1,180 1,365 1,585 16.12% 639 A Desoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 927 1,854 1,139 1,522 2,039 33.97% 704 S Elkcam Circle east of Bald Eagle Dr (CR 953) 8,173 8,188 8,375 7,756 6,940 - 10.53% 705 S Elkcam Circle west of Bald Eagle Dr (CR 953) 3,701 4,632 4,313 4,346 4,686 7.82% 636 S Everglades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 3,166 3,576 4,448 5,817 6,520 12.08% 635 S Everglades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 1,882 2,585 3,105 3,974 5,328 34.06% 637 S Everglades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 3,242 3,649 4,294 4,946 5,672 14.68% 549 Q First St south (CR 846) south of Main St (SR 29) 11,687 11,943 12,855 12,945 12,866 -0.60% 531 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 17,054 20,156 20,307 25,368 27,606 8.82% 652 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Wilson Blvd 11,067 12,175 12,474 15,801 17,190 8.79% 653 A Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) west of 13 St NW DISC. DISC DISC DISC 678 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) west of Wilson Blvd 13,706 14,566 16,805 20,667 508 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 28,022 30,027 30,335 28,877 +1246.1082-/. 691 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Livingston Road (CR 881) 31,140 28,860 605 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 26,988 29,870 30,785 31,042 507 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 43,062 45,172 44,288 44,592 45,594 2.25% 510 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 16,851 18,377 18,467 18,640 19,145 2.71% 530 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 25,993 22,441 22,112 23,119 21,677 -6.24% 509 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 27,818 39,391 31,604 29,194 0 - 100.00% 505 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of 22nd Ave north 33,444 36,724 35,368 33,093 31,414 .5.08% 595' Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Orange Blossom Dr 19,120 22,349 20,522 0 0 0.00% X81` Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 20,957 25,207 22,055 0 0 0.00% 569 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of First Ave south 24,800 28,989 27,776 28,824 29,084 0.90% Page 3 - 8 of 22 4/612005 Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History & Listed Alphabetically) Page 3 - 8 of 22 4/6/2005 Sta. T' Location 2000 ADT 2001 ADT 2002 ADT 2003 ADT 1 2004 ADT Change 03 04 Ll 690 1 Q lette Rd (CR 851) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 32,554 3 8,707 37,364 37,720 38,243 1.39% 654 Q lette Rd (CR 851) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 14,602 17,368 15,348 12,311 11,806 -4.10% 664 Q CGoodlette ette Rd (CR 851) south of Orange Blossom Dr 20,533 24,426 20,193 13,451 0 0 0.00% 658 A lette Rd (CR 851) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 31,874 35,934 33,746 31,450 29,681 -5.63% 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) Blvd east of Santa Barbara Blvd 10,346 12,153 13,100 13,862 14,261 2.88% Q New Market Rd (SR 29A) east of North 15th St (SR 29) 7,414 Blvd west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 6,135 6,946 7,833 7,893 8,582 8.73% Market Rd (SR 29A) south of Broward St [583A 8,269 Gulfshore Or south of Bayview Or 5,172 6,543 5,961 5,545 5,723 3.21 714 S Heathwood Or north of San Marco Dr (CR 92) 6,920 7,190 8,344 6,918 6,711 1 .2.99% F715 TS Heathwood Or south of San Marco Or (CR 92) 5,366 5,745 6,093 5,459 5,515 1.02% 675 Q Immokalee Rd (846) east of Wilson Blvd 16,208 17,913 21,482 23,577 25,970 10.15% 625 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 34,271 37,278 38,702 40,590 45,385 11.81% 567 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 28,939 30,591 39,031 44,916 46,051 2.53% 593 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 18,361 19,799 22,138 24,231 23,363 -3.59% 568 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of 1 -75 (SR 93) 28,242 33,077 34,565 38,579 42,933 11.29% 566 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of US 41 (SR 45) (Tamiami Trail) 34,082 40,344 37,742 38,985 42,086 7.95% 620 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) north of Stockade Rd 7,870 8,529 8,848 8,685 8,217 -5.38% 586 A Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 11,994 12,504 14,950 16,537 16,485 -0.31% 565 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of US 41 (CR 45) (Tamiami Trail) 15,142 0 17,305 17,481 18,991 8.64% 656 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 15,346 16,083 21,489 25,787 27,431 6.38% 52 Q Immokalee Road (846) 2 miles east of Everglades Blvd. 5,125 4,733 4,806 1.55% 684 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846 East) 3 miles east of 29 South New Count 2003 1,382 1,434 3.73% 679' Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) west of 1 -75 (SR 93) New Count 2003 39,775 45,345 14.00% 674 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) west of Wilson Blvd 16,702 17,900 20,460 21,380 21,277 .0.48% 677 Q Immokalee Road East of Everglades Blvd 5,086 5,224 5,205 -0.37% 671 Q Immokalee Road south of Corkscrew Sanctuary Road 5,492 6,033 5,348 - 11.37% 631 Q J & C Blvd west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 12,033 12,157 12,040 11,946 12,131 1.55% 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 786 902 1,011 998 705 - 29.361% 707 S Kendall Or west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 3,033 3,128 3,135 3,470 3,454 -0.456% 609 Q Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) west of Carson Rd 6,269 6,759 6,547 6,679 6,320 -5.38% 551 Q Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) west of North 15th St (SR 29) 11,482 12,265 12,004 12,280 12,337 0.46% 673' Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Immokalee Road (CR 846) 3,230 2,840 16,344 475.56% 686 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Radio Road (CR 856) 12.136 16.466 19.083 15.89% Page 3 - 8 of 22 4/6/2005 687 1 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 10,6561 11,358 14,578 23,314 27,696 18.79 Ll 690 1 Q Livinston Rd (CR 881) 1.5 m north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 31,065 31,182 5,192 20,9471 29,759 $2.07%1 1 Page 3 - 8 of 22 4/6/2005 5871 Q Logan Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 1 10,6561 11,358 13,147 11,683 10,094 -1: 588 Q Logan Blvd south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 31,065 31,182 34,207 29,278 29,523 654 Q Logan Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Ext.(CR 862) 8,594 9,370 10,984 9,682 8,147 -1! 664 Q Main St (SR 29) west of South 1st St (CR 846) 12,835 13,351 12,944 13,451 13,627 1 658 A Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) DISC DISC DISC DISC 0 C 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 4,255 4,568 4,802 4,310 4,786 11 312 Q New Market Rd (SR 29A) east of North 15th St (SR 29) 7,414 7,875 7,763 8,137 8,633 6 550 Q New Market Rd (SR 29A) south of Broward St 7,835 8,269 7,968 7,576 8,405 10 Page 3 - 8 of 22 4/6/2005 Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History Listed Alphabetically) Ste. A' T• Location 2001 2002 2003 ADT ADT ADT 2004 ADT 2005 Change ADT 04 -05 613 H Q 111th Ave North east of Vanderbilt Dr (cR so1) 8,347 8,493 8,383 9,292 0 585 H Q 111th Ave North west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 5,437 4,593 4,774 5,500 0 665 A 29 SR north of Farm Worker's Villa e 9,704 9,919 9,940 10,131 9,875 591 A 29 SR north of SR 82 7,090 7,601 7,540 8,117 8,335 615 A 29 SR north of 11S 41 (SR 90) (ramiami Trail e.) 3,025 3,072 3,198 2,591 2,620 582 A 29 SR south of US 41 (SR so) 4,116 3,940 3 6791 q 4101 3,177 661 A 82 SR west of SR 29 9,632 11,624 11,144 11,225 11,531 619 Q 846 Devil's Garden Rd east of SR 29 3,502 4,2421 3,317 3,269 2,853 553 H Q Air ort Rd (cR s1) north of Davis Blvd sR e4 47,224 45,883 47,870 50,029 0 501 C Q Air ort Rd (cR a1) north of Golden Gate Pkw . (cR a6s 50,825 50,748 43,412 42,784 0 693 Q Air ort Rd CR 31 north of North Road 52,148 55,416 53,860 54,560 1.30% 599 Q Air ort Rd (cR at) north of Oran a Blossom Dr 48,731 45,664 48,896 46,144 39,444 - 14.52% 503 H Q Air ort Rd (cR s1) north of Pine Rid a Rd (cR e9s) 46,610 44,288 49,634 46,179 0 543 H Q Air ort Rd ( 311 north of US 41 (SR 45) (iamiami Trail) 27,978 27,572 27,919 29,607 0 659 Q Air ort Rd (cR 31) north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (cR as2 36,183 34,986 35,742 36,331 31,088 - 14.43% 552 Q Air ort Rd CR 31 south of Davis Blvd (SR s4) 37,914 36,031 37,000 37,895 36,943 - 2.51% 533 C Q Air ort Rd (cR 31) south of Golden Gate Pk cR eas 58,426 55,412 50,809 53,637 0 554 H Q Air ort Rd (cR 31) south of Immokalee Rd (cR a4s) 32,588 31,899 32,518 33,601 0 502 H Q Air ort Rd (cR s1) south of Pine PH, Rd (cR s9s) 51,231 49,877 46,331 46,970 0 521 Q Ba shore Dr north of Week Ave 16,626 16,352 15,377 14,636 14,271 - 2.49% 626 A Cam Keais Rd south of Immokalee Rd(CR 646) 2,240 3,089 3,267 3,027 3,854 27.32% 660 A Ca ri Blvd west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 4,652 5,135 4,250 4,276 4,780 11.79% 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd CR 890 51 688 5,656 5,703 5,927 5,472 - 7.68% R1A a I .... ....... _.... � - _ Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 2006] Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History Listed Alphabetically) Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 20061 g UO € M e RYi < Y 4 • S a 33 § MR LU I � gar N I 4 gg � Ila pa i 8 yx €W tt hill :a a frx g #sll 2 4 Ea I d1 pp 14 a $$$ 4 d4E d !; I I I I c 0 o 4° ` mg--- 9� u�p£ g n o�� acrs�ge� g UO € M e RYi < Y 4 • S a 33 § MR LU I � gar N I 4 gg � Ila pa i 8 yx €W tt hill :a a frx g #sll 2 4 Ea I d1 pp 14 a $$$ 4 d4E d !; I I I I c 0 o 4° ` mg--- HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: PM PK Total 2: North Access & Livingston Rd 80885 Townsend comp Plan TIS Ir 'I- t ti �raae 0% 0% 0% You Nehi., :O: :112, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 097 n97 100 overage ye�ay 0.0 eC Oh � zrl�llll—`111,� - �:,� �� sl�'. �, �', " , . . ..... .... . .. I —� , -� � 11 1 1 46 ntO ectiOA paWrOt! PM PK Total Synchro 6.0 Report. Page I Vanasse & Daylor, LLP I:kProjectsk808k80885\Traffic\SYNCHROkREV—PM PK Total.sy7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: PM PK Total 8: Golden Gate PKWY & South Access 80885 Townsend Comp Plan TIS Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hour[yft©Cv: rate (vph), ... ' 0. 2622; IOJKU- 41. Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft1s) PePxgF x:8)vgkage ,.. =i•r Pi .. , , jj, i ! I :n a Right turn flare (veh) . , a,� __ p IC�dhnr'}& k'NWHI Median storage veh) P ..}ktttx'? t U#7:1?art�31 pX platoon unblocked ,,,....,' , 83°i,.; N. vC I, stage I conf vol vC2stage,2confivol:;,. INY vCu, unblocked vol 1013 1885 337 tG'single;fs) 6:8 tC 2 stage (s) tlf {s}t;;' i .�... ms. r'.,: :.a.' : �.±. .,,' _s a .,... .'., ,._.. .s�. .,t;. .fix. ,. ...,.ii,aia ,; .v E •:.:) „E ...r -_., p0 queue free % 100 100 94 'eaI .A:C4FONMM s?�:lk .. t"� k pal ! c>< Vtrlutxl'a 'rtltli � t. i 1A13?i . `i3"5t 4i'e e�sld �id (7#'i�fl�, �.+ ^f � F �1�;'R t is N Edoh ,rc HP . ., .,. i' Volume Lek .. o. ,... •, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i!J�O+i'O -.�,t cSH . _... : . 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 659 ,. .: ..'''.. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 .:., CohxrolelaSi�: o:ouo ., "�n.� :on: ?: a,b ?.�;ii:...,.. Average ueiay ... 0.1 Intersection Capacity IJtlflzation ', 4F;4°fo : , : IC—Li, Level 4Uiiil a ;l„ , s, Analysis Period (min) IS Y .. e.: ... .: .: , .. : : •� •. ,. I : +s:.. iii ( C.? PM PK Total Synchro 6.0 Report. Page I Vanasse & Daylor, LLP I: \Projects \808 \80885 \Traffic \SYNCHRO \REV_PM PK Total.sy7 MAP 10 PUBLIC FACILITIES IN COASTAL AND HIGH HAZARD ZONES P4 T ew Western Collier County, Florida J- ■!Gf u TPa'� Da p 11971 A0 D4 P rR EET xRS4 Rj St0 ] O i e� It De -y I I D c 'PUSC'e.TPI n , O "On"' • SMOOS T PMNS `I- NPACNire F nM STATICHS E MMMCY WwcC STAnM3 O OOVEDWVENT eOl1NNo • Mmws STAnws NIO WaSTA11CN5 e JAlls a UMARIES O WAM TI]EANChIT Pt M N O�c mm SYSTEMS AND A WSIINC OR MOOInED = ■ V DS ■SCa DU Fn. t„ S GO.AEN DATE ESTATES v� -l'— oem TS SUB7ECT PROPERTY >2 3 EeE .sc+x n TPax TPv me Drop OWa &D20 Ee 111 T ■ ecea Olt TPaD rrss p Dl EXHIBIT V.E.2 Q WAM RETENTION STRUCMES 0 Sc1D WASTE FAODTIES y , N 4 WASTEWATER tPEAIMENT PtAHR . ' xF S3 C INOICAm HIM 'Trla SR4• ••_ VELOcln zDNE H Tole cCASTK HIM ••�•••• HAZMD ZONE Ne Ca I'm O1Y OF NAPES H4 IN =OL CORPORA]E NMITs 0 IA LD. na jN NOTE: EACH OF THE PUBLIC FAOUTES IS IOEN11FlE0 IN PRENWS TIXi. ro TITF v, °ATP CR MUNIO BY: ELOPME S AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENMRONWENTAL SEANCES COWER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PUNNING SECTION REHENS(W MA ICIN S FKE'. L: FRE: LU- Da.OWG DAIS: 7/90 VPDATED 8 -e7 Olt TPaD rrss p Dl EXHIBIT V.E.2 Q LL m MIN Arno �ffi o o.°i�m III Nczss seESfi � w n � Ryed � O s' ,`' o z' � 3 ti p W `s e s ie �a x k tl tl � g 8 e x mtl nv £m S ;8e ^ �mE B2 r m S lS �1E9 i15 35 VIL PIS - ui am �p woo �_ .enx wa�o SSLS6 55�yB RS3j Yfy$} � ��s[o3c] NSESfi �' LL m MIN m MIN Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt Trans Number I Date I Post Date I Payment Slip Nbr 561583 4/22/2005 1:33:19 PM 1 4/22/2005 1 MS 147809 TIMOTHY W. FERGUSON PA New or Exist: N Payor : TIMOTHY W FERGUSON PA Fee Information Fee Code I Description I GL Account I Amount Waived 19GMPAR GMP AMMEND REGULAR 13113890434125800000 1 $16700.00 Total 1 $16700.001 Payments Payment Code A Account/Check Number A Amount CHECK 1 1056 $ $16700.00 Memo: Timothy W. Ferguson PA/Vanasse Daylor Agents GMP Amendment Application: Townsend Livingston Road Check #1056 SunTrust Bank Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 95 /NT Total Cash Total Non -Cash Total Paid $0.00 $16700.00 $16700.00 Cashier /location: MCCAULEYKATY / 1 User: KENDALL M EXHIBIT V.0.1 Printed:4 /22/2005 1:33:45 PM D, N GATE ESTATES COMMRCIAL MILL SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST PREPARED FOR: Colonnade on Santa Barbara, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 16 Naples, Florida 34103 Athina Kyritsis, Manager Colonnade on Santa Barbara, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 16 Naples, Florida 34103 Phone: 239-649-4805 Fax: 239 - 649 -7709 January 12, 2007 Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Community Development and Environmental Services Department of Comprehensive Planning 2800 Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Petition #CP- 2005 -5, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Dear Ms. Mosca: Attached please find the completed application including the information and / or documentation that you requested to complete the sufficiency portion of the above mentioned petition including: • Legal instrument identifying Mr. Marvin Smith as sole owner of E180ft of Tract 98, Unit 30. • Revised application reflecting the current authorized "agent" • Original Letters of Authorization for all represented parties. • Twenty five copies of complete application on 3 -hole punch, as requested • Neighborhood Information Meeting set for February 1, 2007, 5:30 PM, at Golden Gate Community Center. Thanks for all of your assistance in putting this together. Yours truly, X,-I/` Paul Schwartz N P Development Colonnade Development Group for Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Civil Engineers ■ Land Surveyors ■ Planners ■ Landscape Architects MARK W. MINOR, P.E. NORMAN J. TREBILCOCK, A.I.C.P., P.E. C. DEAN SMITH, P.E. DAVID W. SCHMITT, P.E. MICHAEL J. DELATE, P.E. MICHAEL T. HERRERA, P.E. GARY J. GASPERINI, P.E. WILSON A. GARCIA, P.E. July 27, 2006 Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Community Development and Environmental Services Department of Comprehensive Planning 2800 Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 D. WAYNE ARNOLD, A.I.C.P. STEPHEN V. BURGESS, P.S.M. JUAN A. ARAQUE, P.S.M. KEITH A. STEPHENSON, P.S.M. KENNETH W. PAHUTSKI ALAN V. ROSEMAN JEFFREY S. CURL, ASLA, RLA IVY WYLIE, P.E. RE: Petition #CP- 2005 -5, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Dear Ms. Mosca: Pursuant to Paragraph B.3. of Resolution #97 -431, this letter is to inform you that the referenced Application is deemed insufficient. The following items need to be corrected, addressed, or added: 1. General Information I.A: Add Athina Kyritsis as an applicant. Response: Applicpnt has been changed to Athina Kyritsis. 2. Disclosure of Interest Information II C (Leon R Cirou TR)• Provide a list of beneficiaries with the percentage of interest. Response: The list of beneficiaries for Leon R. Cirou, TR has been provided. 3. Description of Property III F• Provide 2000 TAZ No. (TAZ 193) Response: The 2000 TAZ No. has been provided. 4. Type of Request IV.C: Revise to read, From: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict" To: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict" (239) 947 -1144 ■ FAX (239) 947 -0375 ■ Web Site: www.gradyminor.com 3800 Via Del Rey ■ Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 -7569 EB 0005151 ■ LB 0005151 ■ LC 26000266 o___ • _..• n_n_naon Mr. Michele Mosca, AICP Re: Petition #CP- 2005 -5, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Sufficiency Response July 27, 2006 Page 2 Response: The application has been revised to read, from: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict' To: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict'. 5. Exhibit V.A.1. V.A.2. and V.A.& Map is illegible; relocate the "zoning informational blocks" so that properties are identifiable. (Arrows may be used in combination with these blocks to identify the zoning within the required radius.) Response: The map has been revised to relocate the "zoning information blocks" so that the properties are identifiable. 6. Exhibit V. B: Map must include existing Future Land Use Designations (Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Subdistrict and Estates -Mixed Use District, G.G. Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict) and respective acreages for all properties located within the project boundary as well as Future Land Use designations for surrounding properties. Response: The map has been revised to include Future Land Use Designations and acreages. 7. Exhibits V.C.1 & V.C.2 (Comments provided by Environmental Planning Staff): Provide a listed species survey, which includes: date, time, and etc. of listed species inspection; and, the specific species surveyed on the site. The applicant must also include a list of species that are expected to utilize the site. Response: A listed species report prepared by Boylan Environmental Consultants has been provided. 8. Exhibit V.C.3: Required correspondence from the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, was not provided with submittal; please provide with re- submittal. Response: The required letter from the Florida Division of Historical Resources is attached. 9. Exhibit V.D.5: Request to expand the G.G. E. Commercial Infill Subdistrict to add: 11.6 acres (total 18 acres); 80,000 sq. ft. of C-1, C-2, & C -3 uses (total 115,000 sq. ft.); and residential uses at a maximum density of 15 DU /A. MM60725RL (GGMPA).doc Page 2 of 4 GGMPA Mr. Michele Mosca, AICP Re: Petition #CP- 2005 -5, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Sufficiency Response July 27, 2006 Page 3 Market area: Study Area 1 of the Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand Report, prepared in January 2002, by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Dept. Existing Study Area does not include lands added to the Master Plan in 2002, 2003, and 2004 that allow commercial and /or mixed use development e.g. Santa Barbara Commercial Subdistrict, Downtown Center Commercial Subdistrict, Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, and Collier Boulevard /Pine Ridge Rd. Neighborhood Center; revise inventory and analysis accordingly (requires addition of eligible lands, reduction of residential lands, pop. analysis, and, etc.). Response: A new Market Analysis has been prepared by Fraser & Mohlke Associates Incorporated, which addresses the noted deficiencies. 10. Public Facilities V.E.1. a -f. Exhibit V.E: • Provide project commencement and build -out dates • Provide current information on all public facilities (refer to 2005 AUIR). • Remove "N /A" on the GMPA application for items a. and b. Response: A revised Public Facilities Analysis has been prepared which addresses the 2005 AVIR and establishes project commencement and buildout dates. 11. Public Facilities V.E.3: Required information was not submitted; provide with re- submittal. Response: The Public Facilities Analysis has been revised to address schools, fire and EMS. 12. Supplemental Information V.G.4. Provide a deed that identifies Marvin E. Smith as the sole owner of the E180 ft of Tract 98, Unit 30. Response: The application has been revised to reflect the correct ownership of the E180 ft of Tract 98, Unit 30 as Marvin E. Smith and Eva m. Smith, consistent with the deed previously submitted. 13. Supplemental Information V.G.5. • Provide a Notarized Letter of Authorization for Zannos Grekos. Response: The application has been revised to add Athina Kyritsis and remove Zannos Grekos as the applicant. 14. General Comments: MM60725RL (GGMPA).doc Page 3 of 4 GGMPA Mr. Michele Mosca, AICP Re: Petition #CP- 2005 -5, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Sufficiency Response July 27, 2006 Page 4 • Exhibits reference 10 DU /A and 15 DU /A as the maximum density allowed by the GMPA; revise to reflect the actual density requested. Response: Exhibit V.E. has been revised to reflect the proposed density of 15du /acre. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 947 -1144. cc: Zannos Grekos Richard D. Yovanovich Charles Mohlke MM60725RL (GGMPA).doc Page 4 of 4 GGMPA APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] DATE RECEIVED This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (239) 403 -2300; Fax: (239) 643 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the Ring deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive alarming Section at 239403 -2300. SUBMISSION REOMEMENTS �• GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s): Athina Kvritsis Company: Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC Mailing Address: 2950 Tamiami Trail North Suite 16 City: Naples State: Florida Zip Code: 34103 Phone Number: (239) 649 -4805 Fax Number: (239) 649 -7709 B. Name of Agent: * Athina Kvritsis E -Mail: paul@cdp-nai)les.com *THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION 02/2002 Name of Owner(s) of Record: Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC Mailing Address: 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 16, Naples Florida 34103 Owner's Representative: Paul Schwartz, VP of Development Phone: (239) 649 -4805 Fax: (239) 649 -7709 E -Mail: paulkcdgnaples.com D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. ,OSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock Zannos Grekos 50% Athina L. Kyritsis 50% Colonnade on Santa Barbara, LLC _ 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 16 Naples, Florida 34103 C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (2003) leased ( ): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates:_ , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the ap licant, or agent on his behalf; to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Beverly J. Gatti Mailing Address 5731 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 -7460 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Beverly J. Gatti 100% 5731 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34116 -7460 B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (_) leased ( ): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Leon R. Cirou, TR Mailing Address 2925 Santa Barbara Boulevard City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 -7429 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest Steven W. Cirou 25% Richard Michael Cirou 25% Maria Lynn Robinson 25% Theresa A. Gumpert 25% 2925 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples. Florida 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract.. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (___) leased ( ): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates:_, or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the ap licant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Marvin E. Smith and Eva M. Smith Mailing Address 5715 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116-7460 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Marvin E. Smith & Eva M. Smith 100% 5715 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34116-7460 B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 2 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Naive and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired ( ) leased ( ): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the ap licant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 ` C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Steven W. and Talitha C. E. Cirou Mailing Address 2915 Santa Barbara Boulevard City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 -7429 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Steven and Talita Cirou 100% 2915 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples, Florida 34116 B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired leased O: Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf; to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description Golden Gate Est Unit 30S 150 FT of TR 111. Unit 30N 180 FT of TR 111, Unit 30W 150 FT of TR 98 and Unit 30E 180 FT of TR 98, Unit 30 TR 112 B. Section: Township: Range: 26 C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 38169960008, 38169920006, 38168840006, 38168800004 and D. General Location Northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara E. Planning Community Golden Gate F.TAZ G. Size in Acres 18t H. Zoning E. Estates and CPUD — Colonades at Santa Barbara Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) E, Estates and Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: Future Land Use hnmokalee Area Master Plan Transportation Coastal & Conservation Intergovernmental Coord. Sanitary Sewer Drainage ✓ Golden Gate Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Housing Recreation & Open Space Potable Water Solid Waste Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. Amend Page(s) 44 and 45 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element As Follows: (Use Cress 4r_s to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please see attached Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict text. C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, FROM: Estates Designation, Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict District, Subdistrict TO: Estates Designation, Estates — Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Estates Commercial District, Subdistrict [If new District and/or Sub- district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) Man #5, Golden Gate Area Master Plan 02/2002 E. Describe additional changes requested: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to S'' /: x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. X Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. X Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. X Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. X Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT - FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) 3. Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. NO Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)Ta,F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed 6 02/2002 E. Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- I1.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. NO Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. YES Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district/subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district /subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5)F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). PUBLIC FACIIdTIES Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) X Potable Water b) X Sanitary Sewer c) X Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard d) X Drainage e) X Solid Waste t) N/A Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1. 1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. X Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools, and emergency medical services. 3. X Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. 02/2002 F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. X Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM) (Communih Number 120067, Panel Number 392D and 415D. June 3 1986). 2. N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable. 4. N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable. 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. X $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly. 4. X Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). 5. X Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. X 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -Y2 x 1 I inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 02/2002 EXHIBIT III.A. LEGAL D ESCRIPTION GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT III.A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 112, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 30 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA "Z ill THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF TRACT 111, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 30 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH 180 FEET OF TRACT 111, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 30 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA "all THE WEST 150 FEET OF TRACT 98, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 30 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE EAST 180 FEET OF TRACT 98, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO.30 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTAINING 18 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT + PROPOSED FUTURE LAND, USE ELEMENT TEXT *: /:11:31d\Tw:3 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Amend Text on Pages 44 and 45 of the GOLDEN GATE MASTER PLAN (VI) 7) Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict This subdistrict consists of two infill areas. The two areas are located at the northwest corner of Collier Boulevard and Green Boulevard and at the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the existing zoning and land use pattern in proximity to the Estates Commercial In -fill Subdistrict (see Map 5) and the need to ensure adequate development standards to buffer adjacent land uses, commercial uses shall be permitted under the following criteria: a) Commercial uses shall be limited to: • Low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and • Intermediate commercial to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C -1, C -2, or C -3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102), adopted October 30, 1991. b) Rezones shall be encouraged in the form of a Planned Unit Development (there shall be no minimum acreage requirement for PUD rezones except for the requirement that all requests for rezoning must be at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet in area unless the proposed rezone is an extension of an existing zoning district consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan). C) Projects within this Subdistrict shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining commercial developments when appropriate- d) Driveways and curb cuts for projects within this Subdistrict shall be consolidated with adjoining commercial developments. e) Access to projects shall not be permitted from Collier Boulevard. f) Any project located within this subdistrict at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, less and except an easement for Santa Barbara Boulevard right -of -way, shall be subject to the following additional development restrictions: 1. The site shall be limited to thin «done hundred and fifteen thousand (35115,000) square feet of commercial building area. 2. Land uses shall be restricted to intermediate commercial and offices -Ga , and mixed use residential protects. Residential density shall be limited to 15 units per acre. 3. All principal structures shall be required to have a minimum setback of one hundred4400)fift 50 feet from the project's northern boundary. 4. The northern seve++ty- fivefifty (7550) feet of the western- sixty -(60)-percent -of the- -site shall be a green area (open space area). It shall be utilized for only water management facilities, landscape buffers, and similar uses. 5. The western_sixty(60)- percent - of -the-site shall have an outdoor pedestrian friendly patio(s), that total at least five hundred (500) square feet in area and incorporate a minimum of: benches or seating areas for at least twelve (12) persons, and vegetative shading, and a waterfall or water feature of at least one hundred (100) square feet in area, and brick pavers. 6. A twenty -five (25) foot wide landscaped strip shall be provided along the entire frontage of both Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. 7. A minimum buffer of thirty -five (35) feet in width shall be provided along the project's western and northern boundary and along the eastern forty (40) nom:..Rt of the ..rr GVS RGF4he FR L.. Rda A minimum h f of f'f+ (Fl) feet w "till be- provided -- along- thewesierr}si ty (60) percento #- the-project's nogherR oURdar-y. Where feasible, existing native vegetation shall be retained within these buffers along the project's western and northern boundaries. These buffers shall be supplemented with Oak or Mahogany trees planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet apart in a staggered manner; and a seven (7) foot wall, fence, or hedge that will, within two (2) years of planting, grow to a minimum height of seven (7) feet and be a minimum of ninety -five (95) percent opaque. 8. All buildings shall have tile or metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline, and buildings shall be finished in light subdued colors except for decorative trim. 9. Building heights shall be limited to one three (43) -story and a maximum of thirty -five (35) feet. 10. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and limited to a height of twenty -five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. 44— There - sha4-be ne4ngressor- egr4-ss4D4i-- Santa- t3arbara- 8oulevar-d-. EXHIBITS VA$ 1 1 VA.2, VA,3 AND V E62 LAND USE a z a U" c� a a F> Z 0 x¢, w~ UR Q F- mwaw I ww5 `�3 0 U QwQ OZQ~ an� 4S ��o l H oe w CI me vaveave vines U ►— s� - ivisaaiw X a��wam Omo win � W o z ueoa ouoa�rvn � � Z ovoa oennna - �aoaal nand iaoearo � 3 0 Z n W c m _ a w Hea, Q Q Z Q J O - ase am oa xnva� -au nncm� — ~ V�Ft rD W W VJ Z W Z W W J � J �W W J �'Wn �< IL �f v' 0 < Z Z Q o> , z Z f Z �o mQ O N w ZJ �W Z me WQo�o w DUB ~� Z O W a O o W OJ J O d 5. ea o E2 �gjl e a, ,IC - H 0 oe ev�on me vaveave vines s� - ivisaaiw ueoa ouoa�rvn nc 'any ovoa oennna - �aoaal nand iaoearo n n m _ Hea, - ase am oa xnva� -au nncm� �Y GULF OF MEXICO \0 N � Fa .I vz f sm eda gg�.S S tifi ffi ati ,�,'•,. M ✓ § 'r'Jr'y'2s {z r a}�u Iv tP� Af 2 ✓Y y�y *5 C t+y. dye & d�g }� � � �� t4f � RG�. 6SS....::..4.. 9...a..e i .c +}:. ^.Yd.� ®�.1:J::Si� J•. -�_ :n.- ti..i`�3��`d`ta+}(bn'i•YYYr µmT be t; M; _ r _ * , E e.. �■�� k 5 f �, URI ILI �Y GULF OF MEXICO \0 N � Fa .I vz ar m o F Gf. d � 3 o � C � Z � � b. a- S U S :IE'.le �� "e ag "o �� n a a °s i f;> se$ dgt, ) ;/ § X § \ Lj §R\ ° _�!: \2G !,. � 1�,., •»sue , M| � i ±� {� .2 2 : Ld \ } g & %r:�y:\ ` Cld f0NMn:di:�o:d�Aiv:m � ° �'�� r� :• �\ LLI � - g /\ /IEO /2 E " SID T ". �� 1. FUTURE LAND USA DMWI �� • IrvGCA E C:JIIV CENt� L 11 DERIMIT 1 IE .11 fp RE E S F PLAN Q II Pi C G BE 1'R f C LEASE > - Co POLICIES o D R ATE RFC�IRnou . ; OIL WELT ROAD I ].W R LA IL C l[e l WAY. DL Dr L IN Y'Y IN PAPEES MMDKALEE ROAD C RANDALE BouLEVaeD S 1ERN`E. wL� ".111mim RANDALL BOULEVARD \ COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT AT - -- -_:- - MAP 2 C t 99� I � ME DAL ' LEGEPJU` - DATA e R GwN¢ c- n _ GOLDEN GATE AREA i c eD o B uu rn A AI m e. o 1v1 R A ALI BDI1EV1ATE EL N1.1B AL IL EURN REP FUTURE LAND USE MAP R cEN1Fn= GOD C l ■ aC CC I.. ES C5 0 GOLDEN GATE BOULE �F -sTfl i I/^ , N IA. I� VENS 11 9 w1 it SUEDE NAPE IS IMMf)HA111 E(IAII • IrvGCA E C:JIIV CENt� L 11 DERIMIT 1 IE .11 fp RE E S F PLAN Q II Pi C G BE 1'R f C LEASE > - Co POLICIES o D R ATE RFC�IRnou . ; OIL WELT ROAD I ].W R LA IL C l[e l WAY. DL Dr L IN Y'Y IN PAPEES MMDKALEE ROAD C RANDALE BouLEVaeD S 1ERN`E. wL� ".111mim RANDALL BOULEVARD \ COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT AT [ G C I NA" 'ROE 0 L 0� I. rl L rI11I VANDLRBILT C t 99� I � ME DAL ' - DATA e R GwN¢ c- n A.INO1v N:pl Deia :: i c eD o B uu rn A AI m e. o 1v1 R A ALI BDI1EV1ATE EL N1.1B AL R cEN1Fn= m 0 GOLDEN GATE BOULE �F -sTfl i I/^ , N IA. I� VENS 11 9 w1 it SUEDE • IrvGCA E C:JIIV CENt� L 11 DERIMIT 1 IE .11 fp RE E S F PLAN Q II Pi C G BE 1'R f C LEASE > - Co POLICIES o D R ATE RFC�IRnou . ; OIL WELT ROAD I ].W R LA IL C l[e l WAY. DL Dr L IN Y'Y IN PAPEES MMDKALEE ROAD C RANDALE BouLEVaeD S 1ERN`E. wL� ".111mim RANDALL BOULEVARD \ COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT AT c c c R 28E EXHIBIT V.B PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP INFILL COMMERCIA 18± ACRES n VANDLRBILT C t 99� I BEACH ROAD A.INO1v N:pl Deia :: i R m 0 GOLDEN GATE BOULE �F I' EF-TEMADIT LED UP I'll 11 a..00 0 N 1111AILD A, AND �E'. A. SUPP6RT 1111:111 PIN RIDGE RD CDNNVNITV LL AND 1!.' IRNESI NI Ai CCRVICCS DIVI\IIIM WHI?E BE IDF G6 L "I ,.vI DA E ILIA t. �A R 26 E I R 27 E rL W Q Al Rau %ED 4 Y o sueaswc - -� - - IACODUEa enw. A. > LEE DE n G.G. PKWY. + a C _ ¢ SUBJECT SITE 1N lER STA ED iE D, S.R. -84 GDmL» D.¢ T omw` w DAVIS BOd',EVARD C.R 84 El V LS LET m UP w N � t 9y rP5( Gel DIN :ATE _UTORE LAND USE MAP 1 c c c R 28E EXHIBIT V.B PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP INFILL COMMERCIA 18± ACRES n C t 99� I A.INO1v N:pl Deia :: R �F I' EF-TEMADIT LED UP I'll 11 a..00 N 1111AILD A, AND �E'. A. SUPP6RT 1111:111 CDNNVNITV LL AND 1!.' IRNESI NI Ai CCRVICCS DIVI\IIIM IDF G6 L "I ,.vI DA E ILIA t. �A R 26 E I R 27 E c c c R 28E EXHIBIT V.B PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP INFILL COMMERCIA 18± ACRES MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE GOLDEN GAPE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLLS IMMOKA.EE 1ADAD HE 011 WLLL ROAD I \ RANDALL BOULEVARD PAN i RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LDuo MAP usF ILu I A LEGEND w n -- A � "MBE" S'r AxFxOFO V Y19V C o v C_N'LP LELA T'1 — � 0 � Fa N ERR S: DFFKCF I'D, 111A ` ;.� _ SV BACIP TWEA"L I NERD _ z — ev r AI e.: ar ..,." SINE. m - (m Co B0C FvAa o Vl ] 4ia CoM MF l _BOSrma w ¢ o HINDI FIRM— I Ill Eo C B FBO K suimu THEE B HILL I o r c w I'D sued sale aE D N 1- IMET F� E 15 1111' DINIIII LAND pM n� LI SUP G If I V a F-71 E c GL G INTERiTq r Al u 1DR BED IN rou Mor HAPOITCOBARI LIRA. NB 1113 11 IL SO S R -tl4 e Ee RL E 1 THE m s v J v o C S APL ofsG IaI:M _ MST rL'��ox 1 L aru GA F a vl Ancxnr6 zoc F 1 COMMERCIAL S�SDIATRIACT NAPLES IMMDKALLE ROAD Tre IV� ;,Tx o ICHEIRD I B .. u ,.RTC La, MEATERN ores o,STRm, °> nu x VANDER ,I LI BEACAUDOED m V �S m p m � BL U If1 sir V n PIN RU J YJ19 rE BLVD . MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE GOLDEN GAPE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLLS IMMOKA.EE 1ADAD HE 011 WLLL ROAD I \ RANDALL BOULEVARD PAN i RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT EXHIBIT V.B EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 11.2± ACRES INFILL COMMERCIA 6.8± ACRES LDuo MAP usF ILu I A w p 4 ;NE g, PD >I1 M.,I B BBC A � AxFxOFO V Y19V C o sueo�srRlo — � 0 � Fa � ;.� SANTA BARBARA z _ z — mMMERCIAL SJa0NIIEC m - m Vl G. G. F'KWY. w ¢ o HINDI FIRM— I Ill K F A" c w HE pM N, a SUBJECT SITE INTERiTq LIRA. NB 1113 11 IL SO S R -tl4 CR PAR _ Ancxnr6 zoc 1 COMMERCIAL S�SDIATRIACT a Tre IV� ;,Tx o DAVIS L30'U {EVAEB I B .. u ,.RTC La, 5 R B4 R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E m V �S m p BL U If1 sir EXHIBIT V.B EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 11.2± ACRES INFILL COMMERCIA 6.8± ACRES LDuo MAP usF I A AxFxOFO V Y19V p[ 1] _ — antuB A RR1lFIP. 111 19R, IRBRCR 11 1 TH"i 1111L 14 1916 Vl APANEn SIC 8 YAL_ HINDI FIRM— I Ill A" F pM IA SR LIRA. NB 1113 11 _ BCR ]- `a R n u 2A BE, Nn Ton, 71 _ Ancxnr6 zoc 1 s s o T 1 oxx Tre IV� ;,Tx o I B .. u ,.RTC La, R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E EXHIBIT V.B EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 11.2± ACRES INFILL COMMERCIA 6.8± ACRES atlY MAP 5 GOLDEN GATE URBAN COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT AND GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 17 15 W U QJ< WZ� QaV iKh m ppOFp W VDU V'i F� �s °a o Voa0 °< =oo w ; aQo mo �� a ao� I a O O p =\ W p P Q ROB 0 W C7 J a ¢ U � � m Z W N OW U W z J a� U W N Q E O OOD Z Z W J ODZ0 cep? - at -� - I - I'I��IIII� �- 111,111, 111, 1111� `1 17 15 W U QJ< WZ� QaV iKh m ppOFp W VDU V'i F� �s °a o Voa0 °< =oo w ; aQo mo �� a ao� I a O O p =\ W p P Q ROB 0 W C7 J a ¢ U � � m Z W N OW U W z J a� U W N Q E O OOD Z Z W J ODZ0 cep? Ex HIBlTSVC1, V C .2, AND VC.3- ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT EXHIBIT V.C.1, Vegetation Discussion The subject parcel was inspected and a vegetation map prepared to reflect existing site conditions. The mapping is according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) and is attached. The following is a description of the communities found: FLUCCS 110, Residential This category embraces the areas that include house dwelling on large lots. Typically this includes less than two units per acres. Landscape planting and native Florida Slash Pine are present in these areas. Soils have been disturbed or filled, and replanted with Bahia, St.Augustine or other lawn grasses. FLUCCS 411, Pine Flatwoods Slash pine and occasional cypress in the canopy with scattered saw palmetto in the groundcover dominate this community. Other vegetation includes grapevine, poison ivy, beauty berry, smilax, Caesar weed, love vine, cabbage palm, and penny royal. Vegetation is typical of upland communities and no hydrology or hydrologic indicators were present. FLUCCS 422, Brazilian Pepper This area of the property was previously disturbed and now contains a monoculture of Brazilian Pepper. This exotic species dominates the mid -story with little or no groundcover present in this area. Although this area is underlain by hydric soils, no hydrology was present in this community. FLUCCS 621d, Drained Cypress Wetlands Cypress are common in the canopy of this small community. Midstory was dominated by Brazilian Pepper. Other vegetation consisted of a mix of Dahoon holly, cabbage palm, myrsine, wild coffee, and beauty berry. The groundcover included poison ivy, smilax, grapevine, Caesar weed, swamp fern, and oyster plant. Although some vegetation is associated with wetlands communities, the lack of hydrology has resulted in the successional species that are more common in upland hammocks and disturbed sites. No hydrologic indicators were observed in this area. FLUCCS 740, Disturbed Lands This area of the property was previously cleared for the Santa Barbara Blvd. right of way. It is dominated by turf grasses. It is anticipated neither SFWMD nor ACOE will consider this community as jurisdictional wetlands. FLUCCS 814, Roads This area includes the existing right of way for Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara. Ic rq \ \\ d d, w r 2R, �� }) m �... ci I a a ti a O ` 0 I� 1 a n U LL m itv E o � 3 Q U U U U U U W w w m w w w Q n n00 -0 a c w 3 co 0 oaL�+ p a c� c U a 2 0 w m o a W 0 a C9 v�ymNC 2 o�aan U W U moo• -NOOo LL U.- vvmr�m ti U m co U J 2 J Z i J � Q U W O� U m W w \ \ cq § D / \ \ \ \ \ (L (L } _ 0 ) \ CO § 2 \ & w \ / \ \ F- LU § 3 § % {) § § \j\\ , o = ! - § §ƒ 2/\ z-.dw-s-W-U- ! ! » |1 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Section 29; Township 49 S; Range 26 E Collier County, Florida Protected Species Survey Exhibit V.C.2 Boylan Environments Consultants, Inc. Welland & Wildlife Surveys, Envim & Impact Assessmen 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida, 33966 Phone:(239) 418 -0671 Fax:(239) 418 -0672 June 30, 2006 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict INTRODUCTION Two environmental scientists from Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc conducted a field investigation on the 18.02f acre property on June 27, 2006. The purpose of the field investigation was to identify the potential of listed (endangered, threatened, etc.) species inhabiting the site that are regulated by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission. The site is located in portions of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. Specifically, it is situated at the northwest comer of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard in Naples. V ihuparty lncatloo METHODOLOGY z vi y'} :7TH CT Sn ra•;o �.aliddc ��Qv.Llc Csuzr �` z> ctv x The survey was comprised of a several step process. First, vegetation communities or land -uses on the study area were delineated on an aerial photograph using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS). Secondly, the FLUCFCS codes were cross - referenced with a Potential Protected Species List. This list names the species that have a probability of occurring within a particular FLUCFCS community; the table at end of the report lists the FLUCFCS communities found on the parcel and the corresponding species that have a probability of occurring in them. Lastly, these FLUCFCS communities were searched with parallel, overlapping transects for signs of listed species. Page 2 of 5 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict SURVEY DATE AND WEATHER CONDITIONS Survey Date Survey Time Weather Conditions 6/27/06 Mid morning I Partly cloudy with light winds and temperatures in the 80's Vegetation Vegetation communities were mapped in the field according to the system in use by the agencies, the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Listed below are the vegetation communities or land -uses identified on the site. The following descriptions correspond to the mappings on the attached FLUCFCS map. See Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation 1985) for definitions. FLUCFCS CODES/Description Residential, Low Density (FLUCFCS Code 110) These residential areas are occupied by single - family home sites and account for 7.42± acres of the property. Typically this includes less than two units per acre. Landscape planting and native slash pine is present in these areas. Soils have been disturbed or filled, and replanted with Bahia, St.Augustine, or other lawn grasses. Pine Flatwoods (FLUCFCS Code 411) This upland habitat occupies 7.241 acres of the property. Slash pine and occasional cypress in the canopy with scattered saw palmetto in the groundcover dominate this community. Other vegetation includes grapevine, poison ivy, beauty berry, smilax, Caesar weed, love vine, cabbage palm, and penny royal. Brazilian Pepper (FLUCFCS Code 422) This upland community type occupies 0.25+ acres of the property. This area of the property was previously disturbed and now contains a monoculture of Brazilian Pepper. This exotic species dominates the mid -story with little or no groundcover present in this area. Cypress Drained (FLUCFCS Code 621d) This wetland community type occupies 0.26± acres of the property. Cypress are common in the canopy of this small community. This midstory is dominated by Brazilian Pepper. Other vegetation consists of a mix of Dahoon holly, cabbage palm, myrsine, wild coffee, and beauty berry. The groundcover includes poison ivy, smilax, grapevine, Caesar weed, swamp fern, and oyster plant. Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740) This upland area occupies 1.86+ acres of the property. This area of the property was previously cleared for the Santa Barbara Blvd. right of way. It is dominated by common weeds and turf grasses. Page 3 of 5 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infrll Subdistrict Roads (FLUCFCS Code 814) This area includes portions of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard and occupies 0.99± acres of the property. SPECIES PRESENCE The various listed species that may occur in the FLUCFCS communities have been tabulated on the attached table. During our field survey for protected species on the property, we did not observe any protected species or signs thereof. No nest -like structures or tree cavities were noted. No tortoise burrows were identified. DISCUSSION The lack of tortoise burrows is likely due to the fragmented and isolated nature of the forested portions of the property and the abundance of leaf litter and shading from the canopy. It appears unlikely fox squirrels would utilize the property. In addition, due the lack of corridors or contiguous habitat of the property with off -site areas, it is not anticipated that other listed species would occupy the property. The nearby roads also create a barrier and a hazard to other animals. Because of the disturbed nature of portions of the site and the surrounding land -uses, it is unlikely that this site supports or would provide habitat for protected species. Community locations were estimated and drawn by using a non - rectified aerial with approximate property boundaries, hence their location, aerial extent, and acreage is approximate. Page 4 of 5 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Table. Collier County Protected Species Survey Summary Protected species having the potential to occur in the corresponding FLUCFCS community or land -types with corresponding field survey results. FLUCFCS Code/Area Potential Protected Species % Surveyed Species Present Species Absent Density (Acre) Visibility (Feet) 110 NONE 20 Beautiful Pawpaw 90 X 20 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel 90 X 20 Eastern Indigo Snake 90 X 20 Fakahatchee Burmannia 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 411 Florida Coontie 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 Gopher Frog 90 X 20 Gopher Tortoise 90 X 20 Red - Cockaded Woodpecker 90 X 20 Satinleaf 90 X 20 Southeastern American Kestrel 90 X 20 Twisted Air Plant 90 X 20 422 NONE 20 American Alligator 90 X 20 Everglades Mink 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 Gopher Frog 90 X 20 621 Limpkin 90 X 20 Little Blue Heron 90 X 20 Snowy Egret 90 X 20 Tricolored Heron 90 X 20 Wood Stork 90 X 20 740 Burrowing Owl 90 X 20 Gopher Tortoise 90 X 20 814 NONE I -- Page 5 of 5 W O CO a O L �o — I Q o cc L- - - -- - - - -- w to - - - -� c °m rn -j Z_ LU N Z d _ a cc Cn w cn m — N cn L �� - - - - -� w x _ — I u, w I 0 N CD p N — Wmmmmmm p N O I � N V h�� m C7 U`+NNN W m N K O O �- O O� N N I G d m II 0 f/ e_ h N _ /J Q � �I O � � a - - -� p a:- 2 am�m0 � N W Ua LL.N da o amoo� € N co° y U U w a 8 o O^ N^ O V J O^ ^ F p. n M m 3 e Z ►— m-w-c� -� � o Q93 LLLY F N DIVISIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE O®ceddeF ry Oahe dbdemadom Belafi w Dmd. ac.p.emm DM" dCWNN ASWa D1vYim dln•tplral Rm Dltilm o/ Lawry and ln(omutmn Servl cea Dhh o /ucmwnS Oh W on d Admmbtmave Servim May 4, 1999 r - - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Katherine Harris Secretary Of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA CABINET Smh Boud WEd..d. Tma dax Intr wmtPmmv4ntw Fmd Ad&"fttmCif nOdda Lmd and Wa Aditdbevyoemmiama DlvWmi of Band Daps .(Revmae Department d law Sdotnmm4 Depa�tol mo y Salty aM Mme Vdddn rMpmmmntof Vd=.W ABdm Mr. Jeremy Sterk Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 RE: DHR Project File No. 992457 Cultural Resource Assessment Request USACOE Nationwide Permit Application Golden Gate Parkway / Santa Barbara Parcel Collier County, Florida Dear Mr. Sterk. In accordance with the procedures contained in 36 C.F.R., Part 800 ( "Protection ofMstoric Properties "), we have reviewed the referenced project for possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. The authority for this procedure is the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89 -665), as amended. A review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the project area. Furthermore, because of the project location and/or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project will have no effect on historic properties fisted, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact Scott Edwards, Historic Preservation Planner, at 850487 -2333 or 800 - 847 -7278. Your interest in protecting Florida's historic properties is appreciated. Sinceerrel-y,I George W. Percy, Director Division of Historical Resources and GWP/Ese State Historic Preservation Officer RA Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Flo;JA 32399 -0250 • http: / /www.flheiitage.com O Director's Office ❑ Archaeological Reseatcll B't= llatonc Preservation ❑ Historical Museums (850) 48B -1480 • FAX 4883355 (850) 487 -2299 • FAX, 414-7207 (850) 487 -7333 • FAX 922-0496 (850) 488 -1484 • FAX 921 -7503 ❑ F'Bshaic Pensacola Preservation Boats ❑Palm Beach Re 'onal Office ❑ St AuRUStme Regional Office O 'litmpa Regional Office (8.50) 5955985 •PAX: 595 -5989 (561)279- 1475AX: 279 -1476 (904) 825 -8045 • P X:8755044 (fl131 272 - fl43 PA %: 272 -23411 k� �| ,!!! a£a . \ §. % §.,l. • . �- �- , .� ~� | !■ ! . !| A . . .. . . . . . . d § � ! a • . �- �- , .� IRITS VD-5 L, A NN D, USE D A SS A, T A NiDr: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT V.D.5 Land Use Data and Analysis Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict The proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment will have the effect of expanding the existing Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict to include four additional adjacent properties consisting of 11.6± acres. The subdistrict comprises approximately 6.8± acres and is zoned CPUD, Colonades at Santa Barbara. A maximum of 35,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses are permitted within the subdistrict. The expanded subdistrict will include a total of 18± acres. The properties proposed for inclusion in the subdistrict are Tract 111 and Tract 98, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 30. These two tracts are developed with four single - family residences. The Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, while located in an area designated as Golden Gate Estates on the Golden Gate Master Plan, Future Land Use Map, is adjacent to the unincorporated area known as Golden Gate City. The property is also located at the intersection of two arterial roadways (Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway), which the intersection is being modified to be expanded to accommodate up to 6 -lanes of through traffic movements and dual turning lanes. These intersection improvements document the existing and anticipated increasing population and vehicular trips within this geographic area of Collier County. A new interchange is under construction at Golden Gate Parkway and 1 -75, which will have the potential effect of redistributing vehicular trips in the County and increasing the volume of automobiles at the intersection of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway. The proposed expansion of the subdistrict represents an appropriate land use change. The intersection, and the properties immediately surrounding the intersection have changed in their character since the original inception of the subdistrict. The property will now have frontage on two 6 -lane arterial road segments, designed to accommodate increasing traffic associated with continued population growth and changing vehicular patters due to the opening of the 1 -75 interchange on Golden Gate Parkway. All four quadrants of this major intersection presently are designated or developed with non - residential land uses. The County has recognized that low- density residential development is not compatible in and around this intersection and the land use pattern is reflective of the incompatible relationship of low density single family with heavily traveled roadways. F UOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA)\APPLICATION\EXH VD5 - Data and Analysis.doc The expanded subdistrict boundary will be of a size to appropriately support a mix of retail, personal service, office and mixed -use residential development. In January 2002, Collier County prepared a report titled "Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand ". The report was prepared as part of the update to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. Study areas were created and the existing commercial uses were documented and projections of future demand were made through the year 2010. The Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict was included in Study Area 1, of the Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand report. Table 4., Existing Commercial Acreage and Forecast Requirements, noted that in 2001, approximately 233± acres of commercial zoning existed. The 2010 projected demand for commercial uses in the study area was 242.9± acres, which represents a projected deficit of 9.71 acres in the year 2010. A copy of the Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand report has been included as supporting data and analysis. In further support of the justification for expansion of the boundaries and allowable uses within the subdistrict, Feasinomics, Inc. previously prepared an analysis of available commercial properties by location and size of parcel. This analysis was utilized in support of the designation of the existing subdistrict. A copy of this report by Feasinomics, Inc. has also been attached. The expanded subdistrict to include a total of 18± acres represents an assemblage of land sized appropriately to support a mix of retail, office and mixed use residential land uses. The subdistrict's frontage on each of the two future 6 -lane roadways will be approximately 1,200 feet on Golden Gate Parkway and 650 feet on Santa Barbara Boulevard. Both frontage dimensions will permit safe and efficient ingress and egress to the subdistrict. The proposed maximum amount of commercial square feet within the subdistrict represents approximately 7,000 square feet per acre of gross leasable commercial space. This is a reasonably low intensity of commercial space per acre which will permit appropriate buffers and transition to adjacent Golden Gate Estate properties. F \IOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA)\APPLICATION\EXH VD5 - Data and Analysis.doc ..\\..\\...\.....\.\\.\......\..\ ....\ .......................... Market - Conditions Study ................................. ............................... Colonnades At Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development Submitted For: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -5 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Prepared By: Fraser & Mohlke Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 2312 Naples, Florida 34106 -2312 July 28, 2006 Market - Conditions Study Table of Contents Tab 1. Market Conditions 2. Existing Commercial Land Uses 3. Retail Demand Forecasts 4. Summary of Findings Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -1 I. MARKET CONDITIONS: GOLDEN GATE PLANNING COMMUNITY DISTRICT This analysis commences with an evaluation of population growth and transportation infrastructure development within the Golden Gate Planning Community District, a collection of contiguous neighborhoods within the coastal urban area of Collier County. An analysis of the general Golden Gate area with special emphasis on the Golden Gate Census Desig- nated Place (CDP), also known as "Golden Gate City," will provide an over- all context for assessing the basic goods and services needs of the area's population. Population Growth 1990 -2015 By the year 2015, the permanent population of the Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District (PCD) is projected to grow 64.69 percent from 35,325 persons in 2000 to 58,178 persons in 2015, an increase of 22,853 per- sons according to October 4, 2005, estimates provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. Permanent- population projections for the Golden Gate PCD demonstrate the following growth patterns: Table 1.01 Population Estimates and Growth Projections (As of April 1 of each year) 2000 2005 2010 2015 Golden Gate PCD 35,325 44,179 51,156 58,178 Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County 16.43% 15.74% 14.42% 13.55% % of total Collier County 14.05% 13.81% 12.87% 12.27% Unincorporated Total 215,043 280,671 354,747 429,306 Collier County Total 251,377 319,905 397,434 474,192 Sources: Collier County Permanent Population Estimates and Projections (2000 -2015) Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section (October 4, 2005) In order to estimate the population of Golden Gate City for the period 2000 -2015, the population of the Golden Gate CDP (Golden Gate City) at the time of the decennial census in 2000 was taken as the starting point. As of April 1, 2000, the census- determined population of Golden City was 20,951 persons, or 9.74 percent of the population of Unincorporated Collier County; that translates to 59.31 percent of the 2000 population of the Golden Gate PDC. Extrapolating from the base numbers provided by the 2000 Census, the population of Golden Gate City should increase by 7,598 persons, or 36.27 percent, over 15 years. Table 1.02 below demonstrates CDP population growth for the same IS -year period, 2000 to 201 5. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Table 1.02 Population Estimates and Growth Projections (As of April 1 of each year) Golden Gate City Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County % of Golden Gate PCD Page 1 -2 2000 2005 2010 2015 20,951 25,401 27,422 28,549 9.74% 59.31% 9.05% 57.50% 7.73% 53.60% 6.66% 49.07% Unincorporated Total 215,043 280,671 354,747 429,306 Golden Gate PCD Total 35,325 44,179 51,156 58,178 Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County 16.43% 15.74% 14.42% 13.55% Sources: Collier Count Permanent Population Estimates and Projections (2000 -2015) U. S. Bureau of the Census for the 2000 decennial census. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements Historically, County government's program to complete the roadway network within the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) has established the area as having very significant, long -term growth potential. Experience demonstrates that Collier County's Capital Improvements Pro- gram (CIP) program of new roadway construction and /or capacity improve- ments is a reliable indicator of residential and commercial new construction activities and, consequently, a predictor of future population growth. Development of the Collier County 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA -LU), enacted in 2005, provides the federal man- date by which the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) must update its Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). To ensure continuation of Federal revenues to Collier County, in- cluding non - transportation dollars, the Collier County MPO is required to prepare and adopt an updated LRTP that provides a minimum 20 -year plan by July 1, 2007. The Collier County LRTP must meet the following goals: • Preserve the existing transportation system; • Promote efficient management and operation of the system; • Increase accessibility to the system; FIGURE A DRAFT HICIAWAY NEEDS PUAN Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study • Link the existing system to new, improved roadways; and • Increase the system's safety and security. Page 1 -3 To ensure that the LRTP reflected Collier County's growth in popula- tion and employment, an Urban Land Use Allocation Model (ULAM) was utilized to reflect development patterns and the impact on the transporta- tion system of anticipated growth rates for the period 2010 to 2030. Fore- casted land uses were programmed to account for previously announced de- velopment plans, employment and school - enrollment projections, and esti- mates of traffic growth rates. the ULAM evaluated the existing transportation system in both Lee and Collier counties in 2005 and the commitments both counties have made to finance and construct an improved surface transportation network for both counties were accounted for when developing the allocation model. A map illustrating the overall lane - capacity needs for the Collier County 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan faces page I -3. A model "Existing- Plus- Comrni ated for both counties and matched enrollment, and employment for the dicted for the model E +C network d vehicle -hours of travel and 33- percen tted (E +C)" roadway network was cre- against forecasted population, school - year 2030. The congestion levels pre - emonstrated a 300 - percent increase of t decrease in "congested speed" leading to a commensurate 33- percent increase in travel time. The updated 2030 Needs Plan has multiple components. They are: • Highway; • Transit; • Pathways, bicycle and pedestrian; • Freight; and • Maintenance and operation of the entire Collier County transporta- tion system. The following analysis addresses specifically the Highway Component of the 2030 Needs Plan. The goal of the Highway Component is to identify Collier County's roadway needs for the period ending in 2030 (the "plan year 2030) so that projected 2030 traffic will be carried at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) on the identified 2030 roadway network. A. detailed 2030 Highway Needs Network LOS Evaluation is provided below in Table 1.03 in the form of a 2015 Interim Plan. It identifies each roadway segment in proximity to the Colonnades At Santa Barbara including the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) and the easternmost sections of the Central Naples PCD adjacent to Golden Gate Parkway. VOLUME -TO- CAPACITY RATIO VC <0 75 VC> =0.15 & <1.0 VC> =1.25 IMMOKALEE FIGURE 2 2015 Interim Network Volume- to- Capa.eity Ratio Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market- Conditions Study Page I -4 Table 1.03 identifies each roadway segment by the existing number of lanes, the lanes needed for the plan year 2030, lanes committed to be built by the interim plan year 2015, forecasted traffic volumes for 2015, the 2015 Annual Average Daily'Iraffic (AADT), and a Volume -To- Capacity (V /C) Ratio to indicate whether the desired Level of Service (LOS) is met or not met. Roadways are shown in descending order from the highest V/C Ratio to the lowest. "E +C" Lanes are lanes on existing roads and road improvements under construction or programmed for construction- Numbers (2, 4, 6) are the number of road lanes_ The letter °R" designates a rural road, "L" a local road, °U" an undivided road and °D" a divided road. The "2015 Volumes" repre- sent the total daily traffic that the improved road segment can cant' and still maintain an acceptable LOS. The AADT is calculated from model volumes utilizing a seasonal adjustment factor for Collier County; a ratio of less than 1.00 means that the LOS is maintained; a ratio greater than 1.00 means that the forecasted volumes exceed the adopted LOS standard for that roadway. A map illustrating the Collier County volume -to- capacity Ratio for the plan year 2015 Interim Network faces page 1 -4. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 40,900 0.76 Rattlesnake to Davis Blvd. Table 1.03 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Number Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 44,700 61,700 1.38 Davis Blvd. to 1 -75 CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway. 6D 6D 53,500 54,500 1.02 Livingston Rd. to 1 -75 SR -93 Interstate 75 (1 -75) 6F 8F 6F 85,300 82,200 0.96 CR -886 to Pine Ridge Rd. CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 6D 6D 53,500 48,600 0.91 Airport Rd. to Livingston Rd. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 4R 6D 4R 35,700 30,900 0.87 CR -886 to Pine Ridge Rd. Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 6D 49,200 40,600 0.83 Radio Road to CR -886 CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 43,500 33,800 0.78 Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Boulevard CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 40,900 0.76 Rattlesnake to Davis Blvd. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -5 Table 1.03 (continued) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link. E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Number Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio Logan Boulevard 4D 6D 4D 35,700 26,200 0.73 Green Boulevard to Pine Ridge Road CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 6D 6D 53,500 38,400 0.72 1 -75 to Santa Barbara Blvd. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 4R 6D 4R 35,700 24,200 0.68 1 -75 to CR -886 CR -856 Radio Road 4D 4D 4D 35,700 24,100 0.68 Livingston Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 34,200 0.64 Davis Boulevard (SR -84) to _. Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 6D 4D 32,700 20,700 0.63 CR -886 to Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Extension 4D 6D 4D 35,700 21,600 0.61 CR -864 to SR -84 CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 4D 4D 35,700 20,300 0.57 Santa Barbara Boulevard To CR -951 CR -881 Livingston Road 6D 6D 53,500 29,800 0.56 CR -856 to Cr -886 SR -84 Davis Boulevard 6D 6D 49,200 20,100 0.41 CR -856 to CR -951 Green Boulevard 2U 4D 4D 21,700 5,000 0.23 Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR -951 SR -84 Davis Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 12,200 0.23 Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR -856 CR -864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 4D 6D 6D 46,800 10,700 0.23 Polly Avenue to CR -951 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Table 1.03 (continued) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link Number Sunshine Boulevard CR -886 to Green Blvd. CR -856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard to SR -84 Page 1 -6 E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio NED 4D 4D 21,700 4,400 0.20 4E) 4D 35,700 5,700 Coronado Parkway 4D 4D 21,700 1,700 Santa Barbara Boulevard To CR -886 Analysis of Roadway Capacity in Collier County . MM. The 2015 Interim Plan exhibited in liable 1.03 above has identified needed roadway capacity improvements. The following examination of ac- tual roadway utilization focuses on the Golden Gate PCD and adjacent por- tions of the Central Naples PCD. At the onset of Fiscal Year 2006 (October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006), the Collier County's public facilities Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) dated December 20, 2005 reported traffic volume increases countywide. Documented increases in population, lane miles, vehicle miles, and the percent of system utilization through to plan year 2015 provide the basis for a short -term roadwav construction program in the subject area under study beginning in 2006 and extending to 2011. Collier County's 1'ransportation Services Division and the Florida De- partment of Transportation (FDOT) have programmed pre- construction, road resurfacing, and construction activities in response to needed roadway improvements identified in the 2030 Needs Plan and the 2005 AUIR. After eliminating small -scale projects and landscaping programs, the countywide total of roadway projects for the period FY06 — FYI I is estimated to be $617,742,000. Detailed data applicable to the general are under study and incorpo- rated in the County's approved 5 -Year Work Program for the referenced pe- riod (FY06 — FYI 1) is listed below in Table 1.04: Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -7 Table 1.04 Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadway Projects: Collier County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Fiscal Year 2005/2006 (FY06) to Fiscal Year 2010/2011 (FYI 1) (June 9, 2006) PROJECT NAME COST TYPE START COMPLETE Collier Boulevard (CR -951) $62,480,000 Various FY06 FY09 US -41 to Golden Gate Canal Golden Gate Parkway Overpass $29,503,000 CST FY05 FY07 Santa Barbara Boulevard $51,400,000 Various FY06 FY10 Extension to CR -864 (2 projects) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (CR -864) $28,266,000 CST FY06 FY08 Polly Avenue to CR -951 Santa Barbara Boulevard $3,972,000 ROW FY07 FY08 Copperleaf to Green Boulevard Collier Boulevard (CR -951) $29,800,000 ROW/ FY06 FYI l Golden Gate Boulevard to CST Pine Ridge Road Total Project Costs $205,421,000 CST: Construction Collier County Project Costs $617,742,000 ROW: Right Of Way Percent of Collier County Total 33.25% Traffic volume generated along identified segments of major roadway corridors, particularly those roadways programmed for improvement and listed in the S -Year Work Program remains a reasonable predictor of where future focal points of commercial office and retail growth will be located. Defining a Market - Support Area for Analysis Colonnades At Santa Barbara: This market - conditions study is sub- mitted to document that the Colonnades At Santa Barbara (the "subject site ") is well located to serve the goods and services needs of the surrounding residential communities and local businesses within convenient travel dis- tance to the Center site. A map identifying the location of the subject site is exhibited on the facing page. Methodology Conventionally Employed in Defining a Market - Support Area: To assess the feasibility of commercial uses that are proposed for the subject site, identification of a market - support area is desirable. In 1994, the Naples /Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) devel- oped projections of urban -area dwelling units (both single- family and multi- WE POLDMOATEDOULLIVARD ISIS lam, NE RII RAGGE S) COLDE GP 7 NAP as TN Ll 0 Pft 40 20 -ib 0. 11 RIGA UNIT 15 GO, 19S.1 SALMMAL wows 197 202 UNIr 31 229 Go, N AT 51 UNA 209 231 2a9.1 UNIT " 166 1 UNIT 60 6N, LIP' A OREL 3GQ 3650.1 En ES11 K Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -8 family) by identifying the degree of "saturation" or "development potential" attainable within the urban County's 191 Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) then in place in 1994. The data employed for the saturation analysis includes the quantity of vacant land within each urban -area TAZ and the land's suitabil- ity for residential and commercial uses, including retail, as determined by the density indices and the other policy - driven measures provided for in Collier County's Comprehensive Growth Management Plan. The methodology utilized in projecting new population and resultant job growth within each TAZ employed an inventory of then existing dwell- ing -unit and commercial development in the County's coastal -urban area. The methodology forecasted future development on currently undeveloped parcels by calculating attainable dwelling -unit saturation and related job growth likely to be generated by new- resident demand for basic goods and services. The 1994 "saturation" forecasts for individual Traffic Analysis Zones utilized 1990 U. S. Census data, aerial maps, tax rolls, and planned -unit- development monitoring reports as well as other pertinent data sources. Un- developed, agriculturally zoned parcels were analyzed to determine their de- velopment potential. Unit densities were assigned to these parcels consistent with adopted comprehensive -plan policies then in place. Finally, the satura- tion forecast of yet- to -be- developed dwelling units was totaled and added to existing 1992 units to obtain a potential total of dwelling units and the fu- ture population estimated to reside in these yet- to -be- developed units. The 191 -TAZ construct employed at the time of the 1994 "saturation" analysis has been subjected recently to a major reevaluation by both the Collier MPO and the Lee county MPO to account for urban -area growth in Collier and southern Lee County. In many instances, original TAZ bOUnda- ries were redefined to be more compact geographically and TAZ data sets were disaggregated to better represent emerging transportation - related activ- ity within newly permitted Planned Unit Development (PUD) residential, commercial, and industrial projects. in the process of amending TAZ boundaries, MPO transportation planners instituted a renumbering system beginning with TAZ 73 in north- western Collier County. The MPO has utilized the new renumbered network of smaller, more geographically compact TAZs in its effort to predict the di- mensions of residential -unit growth and employment for the year 2030. Ta- ble 1.05 below employs both renumbered TAZs and estimates of residential units and employment. The MPO has estimated residential -units and em- ployment through the year 2030. A map locating the Traffic Analysis Zones within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara is ex- hibited on the facing page. Colonnades At Sanata Barbara Dwelling Units and Population Primary Trade Area (PTA) 2005 and 2030 TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 0 Dwelling Units Population 0 0 (Persons) 166 73 219 167 155 377 192 49 157 193 110 319 194 249 731 196 0 0 198 11 36 199 537 1980 200 0 0 201 224 714 202 361 1317 210 230 763 211 327 1008 254 17 38 256 49 91 TOTAL 2392 7750 451 3.24 Persons Per Household (PPH) TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 0 Dwelling Units Population 0 0 (Persons) 166 92 275 167 162 393 192 61 194 193 127 369 194 270 792 196 0 0 198 11 36 199 539 1986 200 0 0 201 226 720 202 362 1319 210 231 766 211 331 1019 254 172 385 256 49 91 TOTAL 2633 8345 451 3.17 Persons Per Household (PPH) r Table 1.05 2005 2nd Auto Multi- Familk- Percentage Dwelling Units By Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Multi - Family 2nd Auto Population Percentage (Persons) 86 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 72 6 20 99 0 0 0 0 62 `1 26 31 70 122 265 33 0 472 1,336 60 62 175 515 31 62 199 539 38 73 1)8 145 17 73 86 259 17 50 152 255 37 50 451 627 37 1,730 3,987 2.30 Persons Per Household (PPH) Table 2.02 2030 2nd Auto MuIU- Famils, Percentage Dwelling Units Multi- Family 2nd Auto Population Percentage (Persons) 86 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 72 6 20 99 0 0 0 0 62 9 26 31 70 132 287 33 0 1,384 3,917 60 62 175 51S 31 62 210 570 38 73 62 197 17 73 86 259 17 50 504 846 37 50 451 627 1 3,019 7,264 Z4? Persons Per Household (PPH) Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -9 Geographically compact TAZs were utilized to facilitate the type of small -area analysis required to analyze the growing facility needs of the rap- idly developing neighborhoods in the area under study. The method employed in this analysis will utilize revised estimates based upon the 2000 U. S. Census data. For the area under study, this ap- proach employs development - potential calculations. It represents the best available forecasting of dwelling -unit growth for new development within the proposed Primary "Trade Area (PTA). Market - support - calculations based upon the emerging population within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) will be used further to validate claims as to the viability of uses proposed to be located at the subject Center. The estimated population and job growth along the arterial and col- lector road system providing direct access to the subject site will help define the demographic characteristics of present and future PTA residents. Table 1.05 exhibited on the facing page predicts the likely popu- lation of the Traffic Analysis Zones located within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) for 2005 and 2030. The appended Exhibit 1 summarizes the number of approved dwelling units and permitted commercial development for each Planned Unit Devel- opment within the boundaries of the Primary Trade Area; it includes all Planned Unit Developments within Golden Gate Planning Community Dis- trict (PCD); developments within the PCD are highlighted in light grey. Summary of Findings The principal findings of Section I are listed below: 1. By the year 2015, the permanent population of the Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District (PCD) is projected to grow 64.69 percent from 35,325 persons in 2000 to 58,178 persons in 2015, an increase of 22,853 per- sons according to October 4, 2005, estimates provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. 2. Nearly comparable growth will occur in the Golden Gate City com- munity immediately adjacent to the Colonnades At Santa Barbara, the sub- ject of this market - conditions study. 3. There is a clear demonstration of potential market support from a sub- stantial emerging population within a well- defined Primary Trade Area (PTA) that can validate claims as to the viability of the proposed retail commercial uses on the subject site, a parcel located on the northwest corner of Santa -- Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886). 4. All roadway segments within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) requiring remediation or roadway capacity improvements have been ad- dressed in Collier County's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the current Transportation improvement Program (I'll') for Collier County. Subsequent sections will analyze the dimensions and likely pace of development for the area under analysis as demonstrated below: • Section II will detail the dimensions of present and future commer- cial development for the area under study. • Section III will calculate and evaluate the demand created by the resident population for additional retail commercial uses. • Section IV will provide Study recommendations. • Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ................... ............................... Market - Conditions Study ................................. ............................... Colonnades At Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development Submitted For: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -5 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Prepared By: Fraser & Mohlke Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 2312 Naples, Florida 34106 -2312 July 28, 2006 Market - Conditions Study Table of Contents Tab 1. Market Conditions 2. Existing Commercial Land Uses 3. Retail Demand Forecasts 4. Summary of Findings Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -1 I. MARKET CONDITIONS: GOLDEN GATE PLANNING COMMUNITY DISTRICT This analysis commences with an evaluation of population growth and transportation infrastructure development within the Golden Gate Planning Community District, a collection of contiguous neighborhoods within the coastal urban area of Collier County_ An analysis of the general Golden Gate area with special emphasis on the Golden Gate Census Desig- nated Place (CDP), also known as "Golden Gate City," will provide an over- all context for assessing the basic goods and services needs of the area's population. Population Growth 1990 -2015 By the year 2015, the permanent population of the Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District (PCD) is projected to grow 64.69 percent from 35,325 persons in 2000 to 58,178 persons in 2015, an increase of 22,853 per- sons according to October 4, 2005, estimates provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. Permanent- population projections for the Golden Gate PCD demonstrate the following growth patterns: Table 1.01 Population Estimates and Growth Projections (As of April 1 of each year) 2000 2005 2010 2015 Golden Gate PCD 35,325 44,179 51,156 58,178 Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County 16.43% 15.74% 14.42% 13.55% % of total Collier County 14.05% 13.81% 12.87% 12.27% Unincorporated Total 215,043 280,671 354,747 429,306 Collier County Total 251,377 319,905 397,434 474,192 Sources: Collier Coup Permanent Population Estimates and Projections (2000 -2015) Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section (October 4, 2005) In order to estimate the population of Golden Gate City for the period 2000 -2015, the population of the Golden Gate CDP (Golden Gate City) at the time of the decennial census in 2000 was taken as the starting point. As of April 1, 2000, the census - determined population of Golden City was 20,951 persons, or 9.74 percent of the population of Unincorporated Collier County; that translates to 59.31 percent of the 2000 population of the Golden Gate PDC. Extrapolating from the base numbers provided by the 2000 Census, the population of Golden Gate City should increase by 7,598 persons, or 36.27 percent, over 15 years. Table 1.02 below demonstrates CDP population growth for the same 15 -year period, 2000 to 2015. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Table 1.02 Population Estimates and Growth Projections (As of April 1 of each year) Golden Gate City Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County % of Golden Gate PCD Page 1 -2 2000 2005 _. 2010 2015 20,951 25,401 27,422 28,549 9.74% 59.31% 9.05% 7.73% 6.66% 57.50% 53.60% 49.07% Unincorporated Total 215,043 280,671 354,747 429,306 Golden Gate PCD Total 35,325 44,179 51,156 58,178 Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County 16.43% 15.74% 14.42% 13.55% Sources: Collier Coin Permanent Population Estimates and Projections (2000 -2015) U. S. Bureau of the Census for the 2000 decennial census. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements Historically, County government's program to complete the roadway network within the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) has established the area as having very significant, long -term growth potential. Experience demonstrates that Collier County's Capital Improvements Pro- gram (CIP) program of new roadway construction and /or capacity improve- ments is a reliable indicator of residential and commercial new construction activities and, consequently, a predictor of future population growth. Development of the Collier County 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA -LU), enacted in 2005, provides the federal man- date by which the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) must update its Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). To ensure continuation of Federal revenues to Collier County, in- cluding non - transportation dollars, the Collier County MPO is required to prepare and adopt an updated LRTP that provides a minimum 20 -year plan by July 1, 2007. The Collier County LRTP must meet the following goals: • Preserve the existing transportation system; • Promote efficient management and operation of the system; • Increase accessibility to the system; d, O — '�exsend � F wmher os Lanes by Color -4 s -- fi >lcl 175 Only General Len sh..m AJdfiwn *Lane Speaal r Us¢lfoll OA��on ere Included in plan FIGURE J DRAFT HICHWAY WEEDS PLAN ,... 1 1 11 1, 1 i r Area Gccanc,r 100" Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -3 • -Link the existing system to new, improved roadways; and • Increase the system's safety and security. To ensure that the LRTP reflected Collier County's growth in popula- tion and employment, an Urban Land Use Allocation Model (ULAM) was utilized to reflect development patterns and the impact on the transporta- tion system of anticipated growth rates for the period 2010 to 2030. Fore- casted land uses were programmed to account for previously announced de- velopment plans, employment and school - enrollment projections, and esti- mates of traffic growth rates. The ULAM evaluated the existing transportation system in both Lee and Collier counties in 2005 and the commitments both counties have made to finance and construct an improved surface transportation network for both counties were accounted for when developing the allocation model. A snap illustrating the overall lane- capacity needs for the Collier County 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan faces page I -3. A model "Existing- Plus - Committed (E +C)" roadway network was cre- ated for both counties and matched against forecasted population, school - enrollment, and employment for the year 2030. The congestion levels pre- dicted for the model E +C network demonstrated a 300- percent increase of vehicle -hours of travel and 33- percent decrease in "congested speed" leading to a commensurate 33- percent increase in travel time. The updated 2030 Needs Plan has multiple components. They are: • Highway; • Transit; • Pathways, bicycle and pedestrian; • Freight; and • Maintenance and operation of the entire Collier County transporta- tion system. The following analysis addresses specifically the Highway Component of the 2030 Needs Plan. The goal of the Highway Component is to identify Collier County's roadway needs for the period ending in 2030 (the "plan year 2030 ") so that projected 2030 traffic will be carried at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) on the identified 2030 roadway network. A. detailed 2030 Highway Needs Network LOS Evaluation is provided below in Table 1.03 in the form of a 2015 Interim Plan. It identifies each roadway segment in proximity to the Colonnades At Santa Barbara including the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) and the easternmost sections of the Central Naples PCD adjacent to Golden Gate Parkway. VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO VC <0.75 C > =0 75 8 <LO VC > =1.0 & <1.25 VC> =1.25 IMMOKALEE FIGURE 2 2015 Interim Network vol erne -to-Capacity Ratio Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -4 Table 1.03 identifies each roadway segment by the existing number of lanes, the lanes needed for the plan year 2030, lanes committed to he built by the interim plan year 2015, forecasted traffic volumes for 2015, the 2015 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), and a Volume -To- Capacity (V /C) Ratio to indicate whether the desired Level of Service (LOS) is met or not met. Roadways are shown in descending order from the highest V/C Ratio to the lowest. "E +C" Lanes are lanes on existing roads and road improvements under construction or programmed for construction. Numbers (2, 4, 6) are the number of road lanes. The letter "R" designates a rural road, "L" a local road, "U" an undivided road and "D" a divided road. The "2015 Volumes" repre- sent the total daily traffic that the improved road segment can carry and still maintain an acceptable LOS. The AADT is calculated from model volumes utilizing a seasonal adjustment factor for Collier County; a ratio of less than 1.00 means that the LOS is maintained; a ratio greater than 1.00 means that the forecasted volumes exceed the adopted LOS standard for that roadway. A map illustrating the Collier County volume -to- capacity Ratio for the plan year 2015 Interim Network faces page I -4. Table 1.03 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link E + C Number Lanes CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D Davis Blvd. to 1 -75 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway. 6D 6D Livingston Rd. to 1 -75 54,500 SR -93 Interstate 75 (1 -75) 6F 8F 6D CR -886 to Pine Ridge Rd. 48,600 CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 6D Airport Rd. to Livingston Rd. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 4R 6D CR -886 to Pine Ridge Rd. Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D Radio Road to CR -886 CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Boulevard CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D Rattlesnake to Davis Blvd. 6D 44,700 61,700 6D 53,500 54,500 6F 85,300 82,200 6D 53,500 48,600 4R 35,700 30,900 6D rib] M 49,200 40,600 43,500 33,800 53,500 40,900 1.38 1.02 0.96 0.91 0.87 0.83 0.78 1 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market- Conditions Study Page I -5 _ Table 1.03 (continued) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link . E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Number Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio Logan Boulevard 4D 6D 4D 35,700 26,200 0.73 Green Boulevard to Pine Ridge Road CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 6D 6D 53,500 38,400 0.72 1 -75 to Santa Barbara Blvd. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 4R 6D 4R 35,700 24,200 0.68 1 -75 to CR -886 CR -856 Radio Road 4D 4D 4D 35,700 24,100 0.68 Livingston Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 34,200 0.64 Davis Boulevard (SR -84) to Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 6D 4D 32,700 20,700 0.63 CR -886 to Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Extension 4D 6D 4D 35,700 21,600 0.61 CR -864 to SR -84 CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 4D 4D 35,700 20,300 0.57 Santa Barbara Boulevard To CR -951 CR -881 Livingston Road 6D 6D 53,500 29,800 0.56 CR -856 to Cr -886 SR -84 Davis Boulevard 6D 6D 49,200 20,100 0.41 CR -856 to CR -951 Green Boulevard 271 4D 4D 21,700 5,000 0.23 Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR -951 SR -84 Davis Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 12,200 0.23 Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR -856 CR -864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 4D 6D 6D 46,800 10,700 0.23 Polly Avenue to CR -951 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market- Conditions Study Table 1.03 (continued) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link E + C 2030 Number Lanes Needs Sunshine Boulevard 4D CR -886 to Green Blvd. CR -856 Radio Road 4D 4D Santa Barbara Boulevard to SR -84 Page 1 -6 2015 2015 2015 2015 Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio 4D 4D 21,700 4,400 0.20 35,700 5,700 0.16 Coronado Parkway 4D 4D 21,700 1,700 Santa Barbara Boulevard To CR -886 Analysis of Roadway Capacity in Collier County 0.08 The 2015 Interim Plan exhibited in Table 1.03 above has identified needed roadway capacity improvements. The following examination of ac- tual roadway utilization focuses on the Golden Gate PCD and adjacent por- tions of the Central Naples PCD. At the onset of Fiscal Year 2006 (October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006), the Collier County's public facilities Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) dated December 20, 2005 reported traffic volume increases countywide. Documented increases in population, lane miles, vehicle miles, and the percent of system utilization through to plan year 2015 provide the basis for a short -term roadway construction program in the subject area under study beginning in 2006 and extending to 2011. Collier County's Transportation Services Division and the Florida De- partment of Transportation (FDOT) have programmed pre- construction, road resurfacing, and construction activities in response to needed roadway improvements identified in the 2030 Needs Plan and the 2005 AUIR. After eliminating small -scale projects and landscaping programs, the countywide total of roadway projects for the period FY06 — FYI I is estimated to be $617,742,000. Detailed data applicable to the general are under study and incorpo- rated in the County's approved 5 -Year Work Program for the referenced pe- riod (FY06 — FY 11) is listed below in Table 1.04: Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -7 ^ Table 1.04 Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadway Projects: Collier County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Fiscal Year 2005/2006 (FY06) to Fiscal Year 2010/2011 (FYI 1) (June 9, 2006) PROJECT NAME _ COST TYPE START COMPLETE Collier Boulevard (CR -951) $62,480,000 Various FY06 FY09 US -41 to Golden Gate Canal Golden Gate Parkway Overpass $29,503,000 CST FY05 FY07 Santa Barbara Boulevard $51,400,000 Various FY06 FYI Extension to CR -864 (2 projects) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (CR -864) $28,266,000 CST FY06 FY08 Polly Avenue to CR -951 Santa Barbara Boulevard $3,972,000 ROW FY07 FY08 Copperleaf to Green Boulevard Collier Boulevard (CR -951) $29,800,000 ROW/ FY06 FYI I Golden Gate Boulevard to CST Pine Ridge Road Total Project Costs $205,421,000 CST: Construction Collier County Project Costs $617,742,000 ROW: Right Of Way Percent of Collier County Total 33.25% Traffic volume generated along identified segments of major roadway corridors, particularly those roadways programmed for improvement and listed in the 5 -Year Work Program remains a reasonable predictor of where future focal points of commercial office and retail growth will be located. Defining a Market - Support Area for Analysis Colonnades At Santa Barbara: This market - conditions study is sub- mitted to document that the Colonnades At Santa Barbara (the "subject site ") is well located to serve the goods and services needs of the surrounding residential communities and local businesses within convenient travel dis- tance to the Center site. A map identifying the location of the subject site is exhibited on the facing page. Methodolwzv Conventionally Employed in Defining a Market- SuDDort Area: To assess the feasibility of commercial uses that are proposed for the subject site, identification of a market - support area is desirable. In 1994, the Naples /Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) devel- oped projections of urban -area dwelling units (both single - fancily and multi- 4NIi :8 vmx �Y ommeNMiEDOmawtc, �I G0 OEN GAZE ESTATTS NI:.. M6 oel. 1 -.wap,Gl 81 @i[ NE FI d� ' MOEN Gal ,. AAAllliii FAGGE CIA N[g5' E_Tq 1E5 NAPIiS GPTEWA` "D° (CIA w) 241.1 238. WNW i 4M PLATA - WE 4a.A. T 1 1 11MROGF Wig GALfFlI E] STG55 SS A EAiS UNIT LN. . MLL 11NIT Z1 E TP 5 W §T ]B A O TES 195.1 20CYPIT200.1i UNIT ICY Go, s a� P�,; wwwooFwi eAU.rnu wows M 6§1 205.1 197 u n 202 1 — 207 � 20 �32 229 1 �lI'T "' �Acirry , .:C: O4 unlT ze s� A 209 231 -. G!`{DCN GATE ESTATES GCAIHN GATE ESTATES d 1 (66 �, 19c' PAN 1` Goy EN �, rinTEw G E _ Mr IAxS S4 MA pWA COLOFN CIITT•. MMED U&SE� R n 230 230.1 2 Awwox COMMERCE ass 257 �IEI nE 9EFNSMFL I. pNft ; 9HEFwO iq NCUiiRIAL PART( AFY InRI � 1 -n 255. E •pf a ui PLO AZA (I1M u 1AXM1 RAMMUD l�M�1 I 5 MPNIXt E BIXIIEVARO� TfIL lCll. COWIM40AI CEN PUZ! 9Ety SF�PE - Vk51FMT TFT4 F. v. TOT 4 epos 4YE o 36 360.1 r Lp.'G S M iNMPf E.Tp' M' N!RF5 e uuwa BInP!Pe �.niTS VIA /JIO!%T � k ({.ILM � nAP1E5 nEPnmy �I ', d.ES c A• nnlmv pRp QIEPI.AGE .bl _ •� I UNm, VpRll C 4LNG �1) w.*Fg5 35�.f GKP MT nVPlu � Es E 245.11 '277 �, Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page 1 -8 family) by identifying the degree of "saturation" or "development potential" attainable within the urban County's 191 Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) then in place in 1994. The data employed for the saturation analysis includes the quantity of vacant land within each urban -area TAZ and the land's suitabil- ity for residential and commercial uses, including retail, as determined by the density indices and the other policy - driven measures provided for in Collier County's Comprehensive Growth Management Plan. The methodology utilized in projecting new population and resultant job growth within each TAZ employed an inventory of then existing dwell- ing -unit and commercial development in the County's coastal -urban area. The methodology forecasted future development on currently undeveloped parcels by calculating attainable dwelling -unit saturation and related job growth likely to be generated by new - resident demand for basic goods and services. The 1994 "saturation" forecasts for individual Traffic Analysis Zones utilized 1990 U. S. Census data, aerial maps, tax rolls, and planned -unit- development monitoring reports as well as other pertinent data sources. Un- developed, agriculturally zoned parcels were analyzed to determine their de- velopment potential. Unit densities were assigned to these parcels consistent with adopted comprehensive -plan policies then in place. Finally, the satura- tion forecast of yet- to -be- developed dwelling units was totaled and added to existing 1992 units to obtain a potential total of dwelling units and the fu- ture population estimated to reside in these yet- to -be- developed units. The 191 -TAZ construct employed at the time of the 1994 "saturation" analysis has been subjected recently to a major reevaluation by both the Collier MPO and the Lee county MPO to account for urban -area growth in Collier and southern Lee County. In many instances, original TAZ bounda- ries were redefined to be more compact geographically and TAZ data sets were disaggregated to better represent emerging transportation - related activ- ity within newly permitted Planned Unit Development (PUD) residential, commercial, and industrial projects. In the process of amending TAZ boundaries, MPO transportation planners instituted a renumbering system beginning with TAZ 73 in north- western Collier County. The MPO has utilized the new renumbered network of smaller, more geographically compact TAZs in its effort to predict the di- mensions of residential -unit growth and employment for the year 2030. Ta- ble 1.05 below employs both renumbered TAZs and estimates of residential units and employment. The MPO has estimated residential -units and em- ployment through the year 2030. A map locating the Traffic Analysis Zones within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara is ex- hibited on the facing page. Colonnades At Sanata Barbara Dwelling Units and Population Primary Trade Area (PTA) 2005 and 2030 TAZ Single- Family Single - Family 0 Dwelling Units Population 0 0 (Persons) 166 73 2.19 167 155 377 192 49 157 193 110 319 194 249 /31 196 0 0 198 11 36 199 537 1980 200 0 0 201 224 114 202 361 1317 210 230 763 211 327 1008 254 17 38 256 49 91 TOTAL 2392 7750 451 3.24 Persons Per Household (PPH) TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 0 Dwelling Units Population 0 0 (Persons) 166 92 275 167 162 393 192 61 194 193 127 369 194 270 702 196 0 0 198 11 36 199 539 1986 200 0 0 201 226 720 202 362 1319 210 231 766 211 331 1019 254 172 385 256 49 91 TOTAL 2633 8345 451 3.17 Persons Per Household (PPH) I Table 1.05 2005 2nd Auto Mulli - Family Percentage Dwelling Unitc B( Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Multi - Family 2nd Auto Population Percentage (Persoro) 86 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 12 6 20 99 0 0 0 0 62 9 26 31 70 122 265 33 0 472 1,336 60 62 175 515 31 62 199 539 38 73 58 145 17 73 86 259 17 50 152 255 37 50 451 627 37 1,730 3,987 2.30 Persons Per Household (PPH) Table 2.02 2030 2nd Auto Multi - Family Percentage Dwelling Units Multi - Family 2nd Auto Population Percentage (Persons) 86 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 72 6 20 99 0 0 0 0 62 9 26 31 70 132 287 33 0 1,384 3,917 60 62 175 515 31 62 210 570 38 73 62 197 17 73 86 259 17 50 504 846 37 SO 4S1 627 37 3,019 7,264 141 Persons Per Household (PPH) Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market- Conditions Study Page 1 -9 Geographically compact TAZs were utilized to facilitate the type of small -area analysis required to analyze the growing facility needs of the rap- idly developing neighborhoods in the area under study. The method employed in this analysis will utilize revised estimates based upon the 2000 U. S. Census data. For the area under study, this ap- proach employs development- potential calculations. It represents the best available forecasting of dwelling -unit growth for new development within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA). Market- support - calculations based upon the emerging population within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) will be used further to validate claims as to the viability of uses proposed to be located at the subject Center. The estimated population and job growth along the arterial and col- lector road system providing direct access to the subject site will help define the demographic characteristics of present and future PTA residents. "Table 1.05 exhibited on the facing page predicts the likely popu- lation of the Traffic Analysis Zones located within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) for 2005 and 2030. The appended Exhibit 1 summarizes the number of approved dwelling units and permitted commercial development for each Planned Unit Devel- opment within the boundaries of the Primary Trade Area; it includes all Planned Unit Developments within Golden Gate Planning Community Dis- trict (PCD); developments within the PCD are highlighted in light grey. Summary of Findings The principal findings of Section I are listed below: 1. By the year 2015, the permanent population of the Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District (PCD) is projected to grow 64.69 percent from 35,325 persons in 2000 to 58,178 persons in 2015, an increase of 22,853 per- sons according to October 4, 2005, estimates provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. 2. Nearly comparable growth will occur in the Golden Gate City com- munity immediately adjacent to the Colonnades At Santa Barbara, the sub- ject of this market - conditions study. 3. There is a clear demonstration of potential market support from a sub- stantial emerging population within a well- defined Primary Trade Area (PTA) that can validate claims as to the viability of the proposed retail commercial uses on the subject site, a parcel located on the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886). 4. All roadway segments within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) requiring remediation or roadway capacity improvements have been ad- dressed in Collier County's bong Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Collier County. Subsequent sections will analyze the dimensions and likely pace of development for the area under analysis as demonstrated below: • Section II will detail the dimensions of present and future commer- cial development for the area under study. • Section III will calculate and evaluate the demand created by the resident population for additional retail commercial uses. • Section IV will provide Study recommendations. • Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. Market - Conditions Study Colonnades At Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development Submitted For: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -5 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Prepared By: Fraser & Mohlke Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 2312 Naples, Florida 34106 -2312 July 28, 2006 Market - Conditions Study Table of Contents Tab 1. Market Conditions 2. Existing Commercial Land Uses 3. Retail Demand Forecasts 4. Summary of Findings Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -1 I. MARKET CONDITIONS: GOLDEN GATE PLANNING COMMUNITY DISTRICT This analysis commences with an evaluation of population growth and transportation infrastructure development within the Golden Gate Planning Community District, a collection of contiguous neighborhoods within the coastal urban area of Collier County. An analysis of the general Golden Gate area with special emphasis on the Golden Gate Census Desig- nated Place (CDP), also known as "Golden Gate City," will provide an over- all context for assessing the basic goods and services needs of the area's population. Population Growth 1990 -2015 By the year 2015, the permanent population of the Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District (PCD) is projected to grow 64.69 percent from 35,325 persons in 2000 to 58,178 persons in 2015, an increase of 22,853 per- sons according to October 4, 2005, estimates provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. Permanent - population projections for the Golden Gate PCD demonstrate the following growth patterns: Table 1.01 Population Estimates and Growth Projections (As of April 1 of each year) 2000 2005 2010 2015 Golden Gate PCD 35,325 44,179 51,156 58,178 Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County 16.43% 15.74% 14.42% 13.55% % of total Collier County 14.05% 13.81% 12.87% 12.27% Unincorporated Total 215,043 280,671 354,747 429,306 Collier County Total 251,377 319,905 397,434 474,192 Sources: Collier County Permanent Population Estimates and Proiections (2000 -2015) Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section (October 4, 2005) In order to estimate the population of Golden Gate City for the period 2000 -2015, the population of the Golden Gate CDP (Golden Gate City) at the time of the decennial census in 2000 was taken as the starting point. As of April 1, 2000, the census - determined population of Golden City was 20,951 persons, or 9.74 percent of the population of Unincorporated Collier County; that translates to 59.31 percent of the 2000 population of the Golden Gate PDC. Extrapolating from the base numbers provided by the 2000 Census, the population of Golden Gate City should increase by 7,598 persons, or 36.27 percent, over 15 years. Table 1.02 below demonstrates CDP population growth for the same 15 -year period, 2000 to 2015. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -2 Table 1.02 Population Estimates and Growth Projections (As of April 1 of each year) 2000 2005 2010 2015 Golden Gate City 20,951 25,401 27,422 28,549 Percent (%) share of: Unincorporated County 9.74% 9.05% 7.73% 6.66% of Golden Gate PCD 59.31 % 57.50% 53.60% 49.07% Unincorporated Total 215,043 280,671 354,747 429,306 Golden Gate PCD Total 35,325 44,179 51,156 58,178 Percent ( %) share of: Unincorporated County 16.43% 15.74% 14.42% 13.55% Sources: Collier County Permanent Population Estimates and Projections (2000 -2015) U. S. Bureau of the Census for the 2000 decennial census. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements Historically, County government's program to complete the roadway network within the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) has established the area as having very significant, long -term growth potential. Experience demonstrates that Collier County's Capital Improvements Pro- gram (CIP) program of new roadway construction and /or capacity improve- ments is a reliable indicator of residential and commercial new construction activities and, consequently, a predictor of future population growth. Development of the Collier County 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA -LU), enacted in 2005, provides the federal man- date by which the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) must update its Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). To ensure continuation of Federal revenues to Collier County, in- cluding non - transportation dollars, the Collier County MPO is required to prepare and adopt an updated LRTP that provides a minimum 20 -year plan by July 1, 2007. The Collier County LRTP must meet the following goals: • Preserve the existing transportation system; • Promote efficient management and operation of the system; • Increase accessibility to the system; FIGURE 1 DRAFT HIGHWAY NEEDS PLAN 1 \000M\00026018 00\ DOCURepons�Pub],CCOiilinent\LRTPSuminary doc December 2005 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -3 • Link the existing system to new, improved roadways; and • Increase the system's safety and security. To ensure that the LRTP reflected Collier County's growth in popula- tion and employment, an Urban Land Use Allocation Model (ULAM) was utilized to reflect development patterns and the impact on the transporta- tion system of anticipated growth rates for the period 2010 to 2030. Fore- casted land uses were programmed to account for previously announced de- velopment plans, employment and school - enrollment projections, and esti- mates of traffic growth rates. The ULAM evaluated the existing transportation system in both Lee and Collier counties in 2005 and the commitments both counties have made to finance and construct an improved surface transportation network for both counties were accounted for when developing the allocation model. A map illustrating the overall lane - capacity needs for the Collier County 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan faces page I -3. A model "Existing -Plus- Committed (E +C)" roadway network was cre- ated for both counties and matched against forecasted population, school - enrollment, and employment for the year 2030. The congestion levels pre- dicted for the model E +C network demonstrated a 300 - percent increase of vehicle -hours of travel and 33- percent decrease in "congested speed" leading to a commensurate 33- percent increase in travel time. The updated 2030 Needs Plan has multiple components. They are: • Highway; • Transit; • Pathways, bicycle and pedestrian; • Freight; and • Maintenance and operation of the entire Collier County transporta- tion system. The following analysis addresses specifically the Highway Component of the 2030 Needs Plan. The goal of the Highway Component is to identify Collier County's roadway needs for the period ending in 2030 (the "plan year 2030 ") so that projected 2030 traffic will be carried at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) on the identified 2030 roadway network. A. detailed 2030 Highway Needs Network LOS Evaluation is provided below in Table 1.03 in the form of a 2015 Interim Plan. It identifies each roadway segment in proximity to the Colonnades At Santa Barbara including the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) and the easternmost sections of the Central Naples PCD adjacent to Golden Gate Parkway. sp=. MI VOLUME -TO- CAPACITY RATIO VC <0.75 VC> =0.75 & <1.0 VC > =1.0 & <1.25 VC> =1.25 1 IMMOKALEE FIGURE 2 2015 Interim Network Volume -to- Capacity Ratio Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -4 Table 1.03 identifies each roadway segment by the existing number of lanes, the lanes needed for the plan year 2030, lanes committed to be built by the interim plan year 2015, forecasted traffic volumes for 2015, the 2015 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), and a Volume -To- Capacity (V /C) Ratio to indicate whether the desired Level of Service (LOS) is met or not met. Roadways are shown in descending order from the highest V/C Ratio to the lowest. "E +C" Lanes are lanes on existing roads and road improvements under construction or programmed for construction. Numbers (2, 4, 6) are the number of road lanes. The letter "R" designates a rural road, "L" a local road, "U" an undivided road and "D" a divided road. The "2015 Volumes" repre- sent the total daily traffic that the improved road segment can carry and still maintain an acceptable LOS. The AADT is calculated from model volumes utilizing a seasonal adjustment factor for Collier County; a ratio of less than 1.00 means that the LOS is maintained; a ratio greater than 1.00 means that the forecasted volumes exceed the adopted LOS standard for that roadway. A map illustrating the Collier County volume -to- capacity Ratio for the plan year 2015 Interim Network faces page I -4. Table 1.03 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Number Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 44,700 61,700 1.38 Davis Blvd. to 1 -75 CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway. 6D 6D 53,500 54,500 1.02 Livingston Rd. to 1 -75 SR -93 Interstate 75 (1 -75) 6F 8F 6F 85,300 82,200 0.96 CR -886 to Pine Ridge Rd. CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 6D 6D 53,500 48,600 0.91 Airport Rd. to Livingston Rd. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 411 6D 411 35,700 30,900 0.87 CR -886 to Pine Ridge Rd. Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 6D 49,200 40,600 0.83 Radio Road to CR -886 CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 43,500 33,800 0.78 Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Boulevard CR -951 Collier Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 40,900 0.76 Rattlesnake to Davis Blvd. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -5 Table 1.03 (continued) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link . E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Number Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio Logan Boulevard 4D 6D 4D 35,700 26,200 0.73 Green Boulevard to Pine Ridge Road CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 6D 6D 53,500 38,400 0.72 1 -75 to Santa Barbara Blvd. CR -951 Collier Boulevard 4R 6D 4R 35,700 24,200 0.68 1 -75 to CR -886 CR -856 Radio Road 4D 4D 4D 35,700 24,100 0.68 Livingston Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 34,200 0.64 Davis Boulevard (SR -84) to _ Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 6D 4D 32,700 20,700 0.63 CR -886 to Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Extension 4D 6D 4D 35,700 21,600 0.61 CR -864 to SR -84 CR -886 Golden Gate Parkway 4D 4D 35,700 20,300 0.57 Santa Barbara Boulevard To CR -951 CR -881 Livingston Road 6D 6D 53,500 29,800 0.56 CR -856 to Cr -886 SR -84 Davis Boulevard 6D 6D 49,200 20,100 0.41 CR -856 to CR -951 Green Boulevard 2U 4D 4D 21,700 5,000 0.23 Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR -951 SR -84 Davis Boulevard 6D 6D 53,500 12,200 0.23 Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR -856 CR -864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 4D 6D 6D 46,800 10,700 0.23 Polly Avenue to CR -951 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -6 Table 1.03 (continued) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) LOS Evaluation 2015 Interim Plan: Volume -To- Capacity Analysis Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadways (February 20, 2006) Road Link E + C 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 Number Lanes Needs Lanes Volumes AADT V/C Ratio Sunshine Boulevard 4D 4D 21,700 4,400 0.20 CR -886 to Green Blvd. CR -856 Radio Road 4D 4D 4D 35,700 5,700 0.16 Santa Barbara Boulevard to SR -84 Coronado Parkway 4D 4D 21,700 1,700 0.08 Santa Barbara Boulevard To CR -886 Analysis of Roadway Capacity in Collier County The 2015 Interim Plan exhibited in Table 1.03 above has identified needed roadway capacity improvements. The following examination of ac- tual roadway utilization focuses on the Golden Gate PCD and adjacent por- tions of the Central Naples PCD. At the onset of Fiscal Year 2006 (October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006), the Collier County's public facilities Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) dated December 20, 2005 reported traffic volume increases countywide. Documented increases in population, lane miles, vehicle miles, and the percent of system utilization through to plan year 2015 provide the basis for a short -term roadway construction program in the subject area under study beginning in 2006 and extending to 2011. Collier County's Transportation Services Division and the Florida De- partment of Transportation (FDOT) have programmed pre- construction, road resurfacing, and construction activities in response to needed roadway improvements identified in the 2030 Needs Plan and the 2005 AUIR. After eliminating small -scale projects and landscaping programs, the countywide total of roadway projects for the period FY06 - FY 11 is estimated to be $617,742,000. Detailed data applicable to the general are under study and incorpo- rated in the County's approved 5 -Year Work Program for the referenced pe- riod (FY06 - FYI l) is listed below in Table 1.04: Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -7 Table 1.04 Golden Gate PCD and Related Roadway Projects: Collier County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Fiscal Year 2005/2006 (FY06) to Fiscal Year 2010/2011 (FYI 1) (June 9, 2006) PROTECT NAME COST TYPE START COMPLETE Collier Boulevard (CR -951) $62,480,000 Various FY06 FY09 US -41 to Golden Gate Canal Golden Gate Parkway Overpass $29,503,000 CST FY05 FY07 Santa Barbara Boulevard $51,400,000 Various FY06 FYI Extension to CR -864 (2 projects) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (CR -864) $28,266,000 CST FY06 FY08 Polly Avenue to CR -951 Santa Barbara Boulevard $3,972,000 ROW FY07 FY08 Copperleaf to Green Boulevard Collier Boulevard (CR -951) $29,800,000 ROW/ FY06 FYI I Golden Gate Boulevard to CST Pine Ridge Road Total Project Costs $205,421,000 CST: Construction Collier County Project Costs $617,742,000 ROW: Right Of Way Percent of Collier County Total 33.25% Traffic volume generated along identified segments of major roadway corridors, particularly those roadways programmed for improvement and listed in the 5 -Year Work Program remains a reasonable predictor of where future focal points of commercial office and retail growth will be located. Defining a Market- Support Area for Analysis Colonnades At Santa Barbara: This market - conditions study is sub- mitted to document that the Colonnades At Santa Barbara (the "subject site ") is well located to serve the goods and services needs of the surrounding residential communities and local businesses within convenient travel dis- tance to the Center site. A map identifying the location of the subject site is exhibited on the facing page. Area: To assess the feasibility of commercial uses that are proposed for the subject site, identification of a market - support area is desirable. In 1994, the Naples /Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) devel- oped projections of urban -area dwelling units (both single- family and multi- OULOl9ral UM 33 umt J. 11 31 ME A2 9 ue OGIIGO13 "V40EP61u I — ""°"16 PPCGN CUAPE IPUST ��11 PIAlA 3S, NWGE OF NAliE9 I I 6 _ AS 8 1 UNIT 2 UNT G ALES e Ci / GULDEN GAM CSTAM Y7lGll Gie�0lgNNp m WT OS :.. (DPI) S __ 4 OULOl9ral UM 33 umt J. 11 31 ME A2 9 ue . jjgAxSNNA: LAx6 I1B0 SOL L, !.i — "p 20Afl 40U AR NAPLES NEPRAGE ��1IAPLE5 NnIV C .CiRIT4AF GgNO L XA r G CWS xgPLE HgnalAL coLT ,,FLUB , s ADOw- wcoo 1 UIDT L 231 1 2249°1 ; G�4�72WA nI 2 I W PPCGN CARQJPA ��11 PIAlA 3S, NWGE OF NAliE9 1� yG WAVES UNIT as UNIT 2 UNT G ALES ALES Ci _ Y7lGll Gie�0lgNNp rvl I I GDIp ACE ALES tl fA1F5 GO 5 GOLDEN "m ESTATES uwT 1 I CO. 6 WT OZ Y q �Y�Ig1D OR. K 1=GEOP�p�{gg 0 I6 COLDQ I GlE ESTAE TcT001 Is GOLDEN GTE ESTAIES U"T GB m GOLDEN GATE ESTAI ES R p U ® Maft ��. ) mnar . ,.. ®N� . jjgAxSNNA: LAx6 I1B0 SOL L, !.i — "p 20Afl 40U AR NAPLES NEPRAGE ��1IAPLE5 NnIV C .CiRIT4AF GgNO L XA r G CWS xgPLE HgnalAL coLT ,,FLUB , s ADOw- wcoo 1 UIDT L 231 1 2249°1 ; G�4�72WA nI 2 I W E p waft ��11 PIAlA 3S, 36 ®.1 OF NAliE9 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -8 family) by identifying the degree of "saturation" or "development potential" attainable within the urban County's 191 Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) then in place in 1994. The data employed for the saturation analysis includes the quantity of vacant land within each urban -area TAZ and the land's suitabil- ity for residential and commercial uses, including retail, as determined by the density indices and the other policy- driven measures provided for in Collier County's Comprehensive Growth Management Plan. The methodology utilized in projecting new population and resultant job growth within each TAZ employed an inventory of then existing dwell- ing -unit and commercial development in the County's coastal -urban area. The methodology forecasted future development on currently undeveloped parcels by calculating attainable dwelling -unit saturation and related job growth likely to be generated by new - resident demand for basic goods and services. The 1994 "saturation" forecasts for individual Traffic Analysis Zones utilized 1990 U. S. Census data, aerial maps, tax rolls, and planned -unit- development monitoring reports as well as other pertinent data sources. Un- developed, agriculturally zoned parcels were analyzed to determine their de- velopment potential. Unit densities were assigned to these parcels consistent with adopted comprehensive -plan policies then in place. Finally, the satura- tion forecast of yet- to -be- developed dwelling units was totaled and added to existing 1992 units to obtain a potential total of dwelling units and the fu- ture population estimated to reside in these yet- to -be- developed units. The 191 -TAZ construct employed at the time of the 1994 "saturation" analysis has been subjected recently to a major reevaluation by both the Collier MPO and the Lee county MPO to account for urban -area growth in Collier and southern Lee County. In many instances, original TAZ bounda- ries were redefined to be more compact geographically and TAZ data sets were disaggregated to better represent emerging transportation - related activ- ity within newly permitted Planned Unit Development (PUD) residential, commercial, and industrial projects. In the process of amending TAZ boundaries, MPO transportation planners instituted a renumbering system beginning with TAZ 73 in north- western Collier County. The MPO has utilized the new renumbered network of smaller, more geographically compact TAZs in its effort to predict the di- mensions of residential -unit growth and employment for the year 2030. Ta- ble 1.05 below employs both renumbered TAZs and estimates of residential units and employment. The MPO has estimated residential -units and em- ployment through the year 2030. A map locating the Traffic Analysis Zones within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara is ex. hibited on the facing page. Colonnades At Sanata Barbara Dwelling Units and Population By Traffic Analysis Zone Primary Trade Area (PTA) 2005 and 2030 (TAZ) Table 1.05 2005 TAZ Single- Family Single- Family 2nd Auto Multi - Family Multi - Family 2nd Auto Dwelling Units Population Percentage Dwelling Units Population Percentage (Persons) (Persons) 166 73 219 86 0 0 0 167 155 377 86 0 0 0 192 49 157 72 0 0 0 193 110 319 72 0 0 0 194 249 731 72 6 20 99 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 11 36 62 9 26 31 199 537 1980 70 122 265 33 200 0 0 0 472 1,336 60 201 224 714 62 175 515 31 202 361 1317 62 199 539 38 210 230 763 73 58 145 17 211 327 1008 73 86 259 17 254 17 38 50 152 255 37 256 49 91 50 451 627 37 r�, „� r • a rte. �' °�� 3.24 Persons Per Household PPH ( ) � 2.30 Persons Per Household (PPH) Table 2.02 2030 TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 2nd Auto Multi- Family Multi- Family 2nd Auto Dwelling Units Population Percentage Dwelling Units Population Percentage (Persons) (Persons) 166 92 275 86 0 0 0 167 162 393 86 0 0 0 192 61 194 72 0 0 0 193 127 369 72 0 0 0 194 270 792 72 6 20 99 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 11 36 62 9 26 31 199 539 1986 70 132 287 33 200 0 0 0 1,384 3,917 60 201 226 720 62 175 515 31 202 362 1319 62 210 570 38 210 231 766 73 62 197 17 211 331 1019 73 86 259 17 254 172 385 50 504 846 37 256 49 91 50 451 627 37 I A W11,100 3.17 Persons Per Household (PPH) .11,100z'y 2.41 Persons Per Household (PPH) Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I -9 Geographically compact TAZs were utilized to facilitate the type of small -area analysis required to analyze the growing facility needs of the rap- idly developing neighborhoods in the area under study. The method employed in this analysis will utilize revised estimates based upon the 2000 U. S. Census data. For the area under study, this ap- proach employs development - potential calculations. It represents the best available forecasting of dwelling -unit growth for new development within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA). Market - support - calculations based upon the emerging population within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) will be used further to validate claims as to the viability of uses proposed to be located at the subject Center. The estimated population and job growth along the arterial and col- lector road system providing direct access to the subject site will help define the demographic characteristics of present and future PTA residents. Table 1.05 exhibited on the facing page predicts the likely popu- lation of the Traffic Analysis Zones located within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) for 2005 and 2030. The appended Exhibit 1 summarizes the number of approved dwelling units and permitted commercial development for each Planned Unit Devel- opment within the boundaries of the Primary Trade Area; it includes all Planned Unit Developments within Golden Gate Planning Community Dis- trict (PCD); developments within the PCD are highlighted in light grey. Summary of Findings The principal findings of Section I are listed below: 1. By the year 2015, the permanent population of the Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District (PCD) is projected to grow 64.69 percent from 35,325 persons in 2000 to 58,178 persons in 2015, an increase of 22,853 per- sons according to October 4, 2005, estimates provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. 2. Nearly comparable growth will occur in the Golden Gate City com- munity immediately adjacent to the Colonnades At Santa Barbara, the sub- ject of this market - conditions study. 3. There is a clear demonstration of potential market support from a sub- stantial emerging population within a well- defined Primary Trade Area (PTA) that can validate claims as to the viability of the proposed retail commercial uses on the subject site, a parcel located on the northwest corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886). 4. All roadway segments within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) requiring remediation or roadway capacity improvements have been ad- dressed in Collier County's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Collier County. Subsequent sections will analyze the dimensions and likely pace of development for the area under analysis as demonstrated below: • Section II will detail the dimensions of present and future commer- cial development for the area under study. • Section III will calculate and evaluate the demand created by the resident population for additional retail commercial uses. Section IV will provide Study recommendations. Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. Section 1 - Exhibit 1 Planned Unit Developments: Golden Gate Planning Community District W Q_ N W Q r r N h W a NQ Q a I UZ ZI Z U U T N h P N � � Zi ZI D m U ¢ z o ¢ Z Y O ~ > U m m m tt1 N r r N N WI PI U O Q U � O � S J p tk, O O 6 igKy`F N T m 0 sfra ] N N v N "n F N N W O S �Y Q N F o cfi i it aN O Q j W n N J a r U G ,4 t` Q W W • n 4 O N P m W Q_ N W Q r r N h W a NQ Q a I UZ ZI Z U U T N h P N � � Zi ZI D m U ¢ z o ¢ Z Y O ~ > U m m m tt1 N r r N N WI PI ol rl vi OWZ w z z z z w z z z z z u z z z w 0 X z z c2 < Z 0 0 o . � , � � � Z � � :5 � , W 0 0 0 0 � 0 � I - � � 0 = U U _U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 N 31 it px O O fir` O - - - -- - - - - - - Z z W Z W W 2 z z z z m z - - ❑ - - - - m z w . . . . . . - . - . - . - . . . . . . 0 w Z < < y z < I w , < w z 0 0 w z 0 Z Y , �: �n z W W�i U > o 0 > > z z 0 0 W w 0 3i m (2 C6 'T T 7 ❑ ? CP R CLI px O O is W W Zr 0 mf I > zz e VI i6— li 0 Os; 0 0 O O M 4• 0 m p p O O! p p0 i o nq. p N oV p0 O O Q ¢ (7 w O m p W Z xfts, kdr: n a_ e a ;r d> f Q �•. 4� °' m � o �p . � pry � m i Jrzw N� I f' ry N t 1 1++�fit �r a W 00 �. M - 0 O Om m o Z VI Zy. Z U Z W ll W) Z W Z Z W Z Z Z n D j� O 4� O O 00 O O N� P m N N P N O O O O 5�� p O 00 na O N °- G 5 : #.•' { v K z M r_ W w . r w w i c� Z W y < fi ¢,VV t F U T 4. x j Z W W W T a L N #�y., .3,` 41 Rci t w W rv- tr W 2 Z ❑ Q O W < > � — , w O p z} . p O O j, W i• O ': U O W {v O W y p rcZ d S W" W T . O W y F O < 3 W O Y LL p 0 (� # Z OH Z O' m ¢ rn !!? Z Z ❑W "ry S „. Z F 6 p J eYll K 'm F Q j O U W W W W' W W Q O 2 f w O y W (J Q (9 Q 'U "` W N O Z O Z QQ a K K Z sV3y{ O g j < F rv5 k O Y Y K K O O K K R' O_ Q_ Q_ Q_ W W_ O O[ O (7 2 a N N m (O S � lt) mN �� m � Q v t ka % u � tt{p1 Q m OPi N N O d m m Oi m ❑ ❑ 8 ❑ p r} m 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m ❑ ❑ p p O ❑ � ❑ ❑ O aJ 00 0 vs 0 O 0, z Op > > 0. a ;05 0 Z Z z z z ZZ Z Z 0 7 < z > 4 < < U w z < < o z 0 Z w w u Z < 2 <� 0 < CZ, 0 ff 0 0 z 0, W. �i C < < c , < , w , 0 < y 0 < z o n - 0 M, 0 (D w w 0 m W, 0 w m w I z � b, w 0 > z w w w Z < < - - - - - - z 0 z w w w > O o o o < 0 0 w N c6 w zjo O aJ N � N UOa m I I vC Q< V Oi i xf.� 5.•,: i .�. W W n:. N m .- 0 2 P O Ng� ,Z! N P N N M m N Omi m m N O h F w �K7 r m M � F P n m M�iY; W •/LLl W• N M P m � � P (O m' m O M { f e P AR N t� O m N ❑ w i N � Oa 3y£ f OF ° jj N w U 'qY} { �y •p N a mY n �I� M 9p•: " Z Z Z Z W Z Z Z N R (V N i N W N m N J m J W ❑ O ¢ I W O O g w K w .a" Y K N M U a O Y W ❑ O �_ a � J w a ❑ Q a O J 2 g m j O y m m w O _� O Y 43, .L w !� O O a Y ti N W w N w o o w a= z z z a 0 3 a w w W 4e 3 z m m a o ¢ ¢ p a z z w U ❑ U U Y ❑ O U ❑ J N O O O W 45j Z K 2 Z d K K w 6 a ❑ w w w a a N N m F ¢ F- W w WW W n a Q a a a i a a W W W W W U J O O ) O_ 2 R n �y LL R LL E g g g g z z z z;,.: z z z W N r N Ol n Q N 1`Qy M Q (� Or m V N O (WI 10 m P l0 N M F { N W O Z F", n Q O o O{ m Z N m P m° m N °m °' °n `•' g w ❑ ❑ ❑ o m ❑ ❑ m ❑I ❑ ❑ N ❑ m ❑ m ❑ m ❑ ❑ ❑ ry ❑ ❑ v n m M •°,� m m m wL ¢ a al a a w� j a w wl a al a P-Z ol o 01 ❑ z z I A z = 0 C) < 0 0 Z z z Z z < < < 0 z z LZ Z J a o U p O m b O i ii 'III t0 M 0 p O m m O m m m _ O ^ N O m 1IuI N O m � { � y d O O �.. �I i tp p ' L'1 W- p� n OW 2 N` � d• 7 � `� ti �� H P N W �y LL a T— O LL M O O � m � p pm aJ •. M O N O N N M m y � h p � d• �4i'� M' Sg $Ey}t' se Q m N y -i�yi P O F U � O O 00 0 10 f0 r (O 10 'b• w� p� w i w a =,a .� ?•� O O > d m U m r m m ¢¢ U p w p ¢ z w O f a Q p W U H Z W Q m N U Z U O O fJ O Q W W^ w m a a' m W a¢ 1-`- w x. z z a a O ¢ a K O� o :'}g a a a a O O ¢ tt W O >O O ¢ Z ¢ ¢ m ¢ ¢ ¢ w rc � � � w M V N� � 7 o Wm M C N m N M P m O M N M N O ryl N N P M} ♦ p1 ryN m q: a m¢ a a a¢ 7 O -I J W V I O m w mY n m b 10 O S N O O [4( _T I P W fn O ri N n N M ' m�3 - P r0 b m bOt f N N I F xj O n W O O-11--- vni eL �., m b W I Q Eli N o N U n 55 ry O O G W O N.. S 10 m 0 O O VOI th N b 0 (OO Ot m C' M P n 100 N m O t0 -0� i'�'„y m N O N O O � r m yOj M ry Oni b O N O f: Z Z 2 W Z Z W i Z Z W Z li Z U Z J Z W W Z Z W 2 Z W .- d o VJ .: N N N N ry O (001 O N O f N p O pI 0 2 ^ Y U w O X f M U U U N J �"{ W ¢ W O 2 c W m o 2 x U O K N ¢ > I ¢ Z p m d d' fn d U Q O ¢ ¢ Z r Z m Y O O H W m N oo O O y 0 m a m y w z¢ z o O w's. w O> w> fr QOQ' W z w z > Q o 0 > ¢ 0 W r p m 5 Y g O x O ¢ o p w m rc O rc o O 0 3 ¢ y a :i a w o z O 0 y O U w z m ..N ¢ O .' ¢ rc > x x c� x ? w w w F�= > o z z ¢ a K w Q 0 W ¢ ;., K > w 7 a < w g N h ty W O O O 2i Q m m m N m (n m m 4J 17 (n m N t/J N N Vl: Q w i O O 1n fn m N In f H F F O �} O � f aYe n. M M r N N N '1 P M L7 M N 2 p 0 _ n Op + O m M W K0 0 ¢ 5 a P 4 �P n O U O U O vI n K rc K ¢ 11 m a tt m al O oo" m O W Ito] 0 O N A O 2 O1 N M O N O M i' O V v w W S w m m N C_ ❑ 0 u. b P P ❑ f m O w y#9 a O {p N T p IF 5 m d OW 2 W l0 P H ' gy yp O L ry t O � N I µCv. i^ J N p p N I¢K?FOU ¢ P U O O O O O I~L o .0 O O O 0 O Oi J¢ N = M N N P P p N F F O Oi O W O O O 0 IN m 1 1� O O M O 0 P O P N O O O t0 N O N O O O P P r b O 1- N_ ` O1 17 r t0 t0 N O O m l0 In _ In Z Z W W Z Z z z W z z Z O W J,Y Z Z K Z Z Z 2 J y Z fn Z Z W W Z Z Z z W 2 Z Wt Z S y P 10 O O .. V OI o I� M P O C1 t0 M 10 O1 is - O O m O O O O O o O O O (O m M O P M VI N N W39C N N� N N N N N O N m m ^ Q rti .�.. X N = 10 W a ' 5 U W m c Q f O tt > h m ❑ w m 4j ¢ v� z z p m m w U y m ❑ ¢ z j m z r in W O. m IN w a Q N Q m S U U a d LL' ¢ Q Z w Q w Kc Q 4 J Q Y Y ❑ w F, F Q d W m Ft to Vl I (/1 N N a 2 N J J > > OU a z Q ¢ ¢ U a In w (7 w W O Q '' O ❑ 7n rc w (� a a a a J z N Y z ❑ w U' m m m z N N LL a ¢ p W R m W K O ~ K K K w r z z r j rc m ¢ ¢ f G = w r ¢ w z C7 O tt w O O O U U: o 0 W m W N o O w j m D w K 2 V a> a d w w Q O C F z If w w H F F j w m ZZ z z Z z H Q > Q > Q > W > W W LL O Z z Q Q 6 Q Q Q W W W FF 2 F 2 > to r P N N vt tp ty O m N ,tp tV F P o m oo M m ° m m m n ❑ ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ m P o W m: m m m ❑ N p m ❑ m D❑ o ❑ ❑ O: m a 0 U i o a o O t` m r t o E O rc Z- p � �« W= wz, m m m o Jc tee TO W O. v.," 1- OJ S vO 0 O p a J O a F' y'b l.: F N Q J¢un N F'ryn LL M ry�' ?i N O 0 ii .i A@ E G O v r tir O 0 40 0 ❑ ' r �2 ' - a F^ N 00 a N m m f0 (O r m` O j P ? Q *tt+y' i Z Z Z Z Z W W Z LL Z Z Z Z w %k Z Z Z aµ U Z Z U' Z 2 7 w U R m w w w ❑. U U VJ i a `E < � r E .: � '`] 0 5 m ll w �,{ ve�j' T 5 E T w w w w O,. .. O„ w O • WUIs w w K rz Z eP m Q y � K g D O LL Y Y Y Z W m E m g w t a O m U C7 < ¢ w * Z ¢ > .. . z m Z U m V Z K T n z _ z w ¢ o o N w w " ❑ 2 El C7 7 ❑ o o x E5 W ❑ O o O ❑ % L � � t1 Q r m ] ~ tj` 4, E IN W U' O H F P: m r m C? m m i m m m ❑ ❑O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m Om ❑ N r p 'a E- - > O ! ❑ m ❑ m '3 O U O 2 ° m a 0 U Section 1 - Exhibit 2 Collier County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): Fiscal Year 2006/07 to Fiscal Year 2010/11 r `I C) cYw om v� vv o� n G O c_n n J �. d O N O< V N N O Y N w to n N O `j CL c ro 0O W\ J o d m _ o m z . trr J m i° �- N 'C �0 d m m I o 117 b c m C.. - `C O ? 0 ��✓ '000 7;0d ry�y �y '9 117 w av d'°v Nv oro �� "� m 9� C 7 n r Y ;C d 0 -J 0 -oe YG m l tV 0 e m ro 0 r4710 '1O E a y pk � V � s, Y Y 5 4 111111 1y 4. I Vil V .('jLr�J��li L, I 5 )o' rn1� n a. m v` i M _ n W LW ^d i� �TNn aoa N q a� T � R (9 6�n a O aa� 3av pp O 6 Vii, --------------- c \\ S `.1 .7 Y �7 Vv Z m A d 9 A n N Q P 0 �r,Grs, rw �rk� H DN NN „NOP 40POON OM „i li Y i s'19� a 4 cWjN,qx WtiM �7 v b p w ij Y ^U 1 _ k � I a couYr YAMY I �T r, 1 �J I � Ir• Iry laM(•iJ �11r.r✓ _ < oV auYi iNU � i br N Yu �rk� H DN NN „NOP 40POON OM „i li Y i s'19� a 4 cWjN,qx WtiM �7 v b p w ij Y ^U 1 _ k � I a couYr YAMY I �T r, 1 �J le A s 1. ) L 0 .v o b 2 I- li{ q n v V I 1 V V N N1 m A O N i 4 N WO LL L ;L pL mL ' L, Cj N GI VI VVi ? � n le a o m 4 M -1 4 4 1 p 31 n Z V o . o 0 0 0 0 V O A nl lu o n O m I U o 0 V W W a . N 1/, W w N A Z! m y' gcoamoo i n g o � o� �lao 0000 > o o O o o0 s O O O O °m u $ � O O o o O O O 1 o In o 0 0 0 0 o m o a o o °0 0 0 0 b N p 0 O 0 0 o a o 0 u1pi °o a ag0000000gVO:000 o e qo bo o s ooNOU�o�Nao�,oa� oo`] eo o� m3L I(o i13� pSL n$ S� SIC p£L�. ynlSL Ao� In ✓' J f f C �m .. o I Nvi > n o n n u m l u; v� a vim I o v vta m a 1 z rn m y zm � A TI L n py fl to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 $ o 0 0 0 0 O O o O O U O ,� W O J .• a O p O O U O O O O L � O a a y u V p it C. N> R o 0 0 0 o N 'oo i 0 0 o I a � ti S � O N r m C r , e v � m �w In c i m �L � 4 a A 0 a � v m A � 1 U P of NI 1 O i a O� > 3� L � O ` F Y b c U o U5 y Ir r O i z 0 n cc% L A L o ' �n O z y o `C 2 u u U { 1 I f! o 0 0 p O O S N N 0 IJ i u u n n ml A T n� A N m b_ W CG G) C5 e r ro ni o{ yr v u y OI I b � ,I Z -n n - u � u s > N N U � I - p T 11� w U�o Y O fa O O o � a { i W 8e o04� !) �N u 0 5 O I N G a i TI � ' v f� , 3 i u q u 4 'v` 11 -N q U O1 O) O Q! C J ys u �N u w N G W O tU IJ O O O O ` {t N OI � 4 2D 2 z. -n m ->rl .. -n -i 0 z m -A z oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 3 m C30 N YO 0 0 3 = If <<, 11 Am" 40 cum—)) 0) cao, 2 4 z M> M > col .0, �x 000 0, m > > > S > 0 0 C) M m m 0 00-1 Om 0, 0 U) z T Ozo Z () En x co �mz do m * C,) c0 d > W -i M C: 0 z -A 0 C Om 0 0 ;D DMIS mvirgamor I I cAXxf El EJ Nu ----------------- W it n. --------------- E IIII. I. [OJl JORDON- DM CD CD i I b ° 0 tl. �I y u z z I c < Cl V [l V N N N 0j m N m O ° o 8 O o p OO p� �jo O O o N W o v �D o0 m O I A a n a � D C I N r OI o p j of o o� o� w ° b rn r n o z m i m 1< o u o v N N LI N �J Ol N O O O NO O 0 0 0 0 b � o i WN Of J Iv J a O o T D � IOiI L n p 5 m A o -a ? y - � Y �G O 0 a i' u ti n ' O i U ur. a° 4, L g o 0 Oo 0 0 o G o v O � N+ i O p O O rryyp o p2i o p O O s o � C) c n � r r ° rir ' a m I � y � m y Oa vyL AL FL 1 zL O ] £ O L I .r u I - � 0 b 3 ° I b R m n. r r ` IT o 11 b 1N11 Ill 111 �� 1�1 r m IM O O M O p l y � y 8 O L $D O p O Y yr 0 Y �pa5, o m Q Q o V � � b I 0 0 Oi 0 0 o q OI O O OI o 6 O o D o O o r u o o Y o� o JI ➢ 5 � y LSS� � p 1 y A w z z w U i I b ° 0 tl. �I y u z z I c < Cl V [l V N N N 0j m N m O ° o 8 O o p OO p� �jo O O o N W o v �D o0 m O I A a n a � D C I N r OI o p j of o o� o� w ° b rn r n o z m i m 1< o u o v N N LI N �J Ol N O O O NO O 0 0 0 0 b � o i WN Of J Iv J a O o T D � IOiI L n p 5 m A o -a ? y - � Y �G O 0 a i' u ti n ' O i U ur. a° 4, L g o 0 Oo 0 0 o G o v O � N+ i O p O O rryyp o p2i o p O O s o � C) c n � r r ° rir ' a m I � y � m y NQ ' vyL AL FL L zL O ] £ O I .r u 0 ° I b R m n. o u C 1N11 Ill 111 �� 1�1 I n m IM O O M O p p p NC Q p 0 y 8 O L $D O p O Y yr 0 Y �pa5, o m Q Q o V � � b D o O O o D o O o r L A A r A ➢ 5 � y LSS� � p y A w z z w U u r "m 'v U1 rp Ga - N IIl fl N N V L N Y➢ y U N m�U A D C J V a O o N Y` N 8 ° (YJ N etlO o � b gV Iv O � a pR S �R R S . E N c �N G a FS E 4 r m° N a n� 5 y 5 O sE° r O g n e n N H R f � a W Zary J G 6F W Z < � 2 G U 0 C e �R � � a ye $R L � h �R S J � � R e °g �R m g �s ¢ N �S d $ h ff R 0 s e § i QQ � 8 R $ s $ F o o n V S nR 3 nn5 L N m 3 sg a e a f m °a w n n M $ v P E m m P a o - n `o fi z E z v o OFF V O P O o o e �momNO emu _ Sic ad fig" a Env � ate B u o 0 ?E_ - °�' S a3io A ry V J N Y u a j 0 Vsep�� ° wgp�po3 mOSm vS u°m 9R x0 a o ou v -- P'�Em� o om¢ E "CCCOa°.tc�P3 °Em >ao s o�E or 2 m °cw "'° ,o o� 'a u z 900 ... z' ho a o _ _ _ ° . a c co °o oP� p�o?mmo.- c om a 8 8 V 5 �RRR$Rm��nm $rv�MmnanRd6H ^AnNR$r °m �ryd �np po n`nnR$rn mn�mdm N N S. `ei "'n ua'$dNry 4R mRrvRN„n�� ^Ary °y4e$Smym:�F�R N i�`iNrvV f' R NNN mN�nnN $NRnYON�nNN $a$$aroma��r nRre.Ni� �NResn��K�s m- 125x$4 'a 9R�9 ;3ry "B ask-WE ;RRfo eim dWrvn M' M n N n p N m y m r O {Oym Ny$ OOIQRNp AONNYINNO�O MVnfl VNCNMIVO�1��' flA O�'Im0 O O� ZZ E 22m2dWW LL�_� U Z$byy��v�euo� �((7/jC�K {p V�IU O Em 2NUW'U JK'f 2U�m e �R � � a ye $R L � h �R S J � � R e °g �R m g �s ¢ N �S d $ h ff R 0 s e § i QQ � 8 R $ s $ F o o n V S nR 3 nn5 L N m 3 sg a e a f m °a w n n M $ v P E m m P a o - n `o fi z E z v o OFF V O P O o o e �momNO emu _ Sic ad fig" a Env � ate B u o 0 ?E_ - °�' S a3io A ry V J N Y u a j 0 Vsep�� ° wgp�po3 mOSm vS u°m 9R x0 a o ou v -- P'�Em� o om¢ E "CCCOa°.tc�P3 °Em >ao s o�E or 2 m °cw "'° ,o o� 'a u z 900 ... z' ho a o _ _ _ ° . a c co °o oP� p�o?mmo.- c om a 8 8 V 5 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -1 II. EXISTING COMMERCIAL LAND USES Market conditions analyzed in Section I demonstrated clearly that ac- celerated growth in the permanent population of Golden Gate City and the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) demonstrates potential market support from an emerging population within a defined Primary Trade Area that can document claims as to the viability of proposed com- mercial uses on the subject Colonnades At Santa Barbara. Section II will detail the dimensions of present commercial develop- ment in Golden Gate City and the Golden Gate PCD. The predictable desires of the increased population in the Primary Trade Area (PTA) for basic goods and services forecast a steady, incremental development of currently underutilized commercial parcels along the Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886) and Santa Barbara Boulevard corridors con- sistent with the recent patterns in area growth of new residential units. Additionally, office space; repair and wholesale facilities; hotels and motels; entertainment centers; and institutional uses such as churches, nursing homes, and schools will likely be accommodated as well on available land developed, or being developed, for these purposes. tential in Collier County (Fraser & Mohlke Associates, February 1997) estab- lished that new commercial structures totaling 2,672,034 square feet were completed from 1986 to 1995, constituting a 254.08 percent increase from a total of 1,051,637 square feet developed in 1986 to 3,723,671 square feet of commercial structures developed by 1995 (Reference "Table One: Land Use Inventory for Commercially Zoned Areas of Collier County"). Prospects are that a similar analysis for the 10 -year period from 1995 to the present would demonstrate an even greater increase in commercial square footage. Commercial Land -Use Inventory The 2005 Collier County Commercial Land Use Study, prepared by the Comprehensive Planning Section as Appendix A -1 to the Future Land Use Element Support Document, analyzed commercial zoning including the standard categories of C -1, C -2, C -3, C -4, C -5, and PUD zoning as defined in the County's Land Development Code. A list of applicable 2 -digit codes from the Collier County Property Ap- praiser's-Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) Codes is provided to describe the listed land uses; all other relevant data is reported by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), and by commercial land -use categories now in effect in Collier County. Selected data derived from the most recent available land -use data collected in calendar year 2005 has been incorporated in an analysis reported later in Section II. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page Il -2 Property- appraisal -based analysis presents certain difficulties in match- ing commercially zoned acreage with acreage classified according to Property Appraiser land -use codes. Consequently, this analysis will limit the use of property- appraisal data to site - specific determinations of acreage and the square -foot dimensions of existing structures only. Commercial acreage and buildings reported by the square- footage of a structure's "footprint" com- prise much of the basis for the analysis that follows. Utilization of Community Shopping Centers for Non - Traditional Uses Countywide, data from the 2005 Commercial Land Use Study suggests that some of the area's community shopping centers are performing a role beyond their traditional function as a site for retail shopping anchored tradi- tionally by a supermarket and a drug store. Determining the motivation of older shopping center tenants to lease space, and why their customers sup- port an older center's non - retail business enterprises is well beyond the scope of this analysis. However, an ongoing analysis exploring the evolving community role of older neighborhood and community shopping center sites under 25.00 acres may well be timely in order to evaluate the importance of these centers in providing non - retail services to nearby neighborhood residents. Evolving utilization of neighborhood and community shopping cen- ters for non - traditional purposes is an essentially unaddressed element of land -use planning in Collier County. In recent years, the use of existing centers by non - retail vendors, many of whom might logically locate their activities in traditional office buildings or office parks, is becoming com- monplace. Although evidence as to why non - traditional tenants lease space in community shopping centers, and why customers support these tenants, is largely anecdotal, the reasons listed below indicate reasons why non- traditional users, like those requiring office or storage space only, are re- placing traditional retail tenants. Reasons given to Fraser & Mohlke Associates by non - traditional tenants for locating their business activities in older community shopping centers include the following: • Desirable location, • Availability of vacant storefronts at affordable lease rates, • Security, • Zoning considerations unique to certain businesses or professions, -. Cost of alternative real estate near a vendors preferred location, • Costs related to the construction of free - standing office structures, • Parking requirements specific to certain businesses and professions, Colonnades At Sanata Barbara Dwelling Units and Population By Traffic Analysis Zone Primary Trade Area (PTA) 2005 and 2030 (TAZ) Table 2.01 2005 TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 2nd Auto Multi - Family Multi - Family 2nd Auto Dwelling Units Population Percentage Dwelling Units Population Percentage TAZ Single - Family (Persons) 2nd Auto Multi - Family (Persons) 2nd Auto 166 73 219 86 0 0 0 167 155 377 86 0 0 0 192 49 157 72 0 0 0 193 110 319 72 0 0 0 194 249 731 72 6 20 99 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 11 36 62 9 26 31 199 537 1980 70 122 265 33 200 0 0 0 472 1,336 60 201 224 714 62 175 515 31 202 361 1317 62 199 539 38 210 230 763 73 58 145 17 211 327 1008 73 86 259 17 254 17 38 50 152 255 37 256 49 91 50 451 627 37 3.24 Persons Per Household (PPH) 2.30 Persons Per Household (PPH) r Table 2.02 2030 TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 2nd Auto Multi - Family Multi - Family 2nd Auto Dwelling Units Population Percentage Dwelling Units Population Percentage (Persons) (Persons) 166 92 275 86 0 0 0 167 162 393 86 0 0 0 192 61 194 72 0 0 0 193 127 369 72 0 0 0 194 270 792 72 6 20 99 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 11 36 62 9 26 31 199 539 1986 70 132 287 33 200 0 0 0 1,384 3,917 60 201 226 720 62 175 515 31 202 362 1319 62 210 570 38 210 231 766 73 62 197 17 211 331 1019 73 86 259 17 254 172 385 50 504 846 37 256 49 91 50 451 627 37 3.17 Persons Per Household (PPH) 2.41 Persons Per Household (PPH) r Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -3 • "Walk -in" traffic supplied by adjacent tenants, • Minimum need for store -front visibility to attract customers, and • Availability of on- premises management services and maintenance. Anticipating New Commercial Uses in Collier County Additionally, Golden Gate area growth may soon result in increased pressures for commercial development along the Golden Gate Parkway (CR- 886) and the Santa Barbara Boulevard corridors to accommodate the goods - and- services needs of a growing population within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) analyzed in this market - conditions study. Extension of commercial development along these corridors will likely be driven by considerations such as the spacing requirements of re- tail /wholesale -chain outlets, the emerging needs of surrounding commercial and residential development, and the as yet unannounced plans of develop- ers of an approved and /or a proposed Planned Use Development (PUD) lo- cated in the immediate area that may yet lead to proposals to zone and de- velop new commercial facilities that are not currently under review by county planners at the time of this writing. Characteristics of Commercial Land -Use in the Primary Trade Area To document the need for new commercial facilities Primary Trade Area (PTA) as proposed in Section I, it is necessary to examine the present pattern of commercial development along its principal arterial and collector roads. Specific land use designations are listed later in Section II. These des- ignations are taken from the Collier County Commercial Land Use Inven- tory (2005). Land use designations are derived from appraisal records and Geo- graphic Information Service (GIS) data provided by the County's Property Appraiser Office, the Comprehensive Planning Section's PUD Inventory, and Zoning Maps. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) planning docu- ments provide additional information on each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). Commercial land uses located in the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara will be benefited by an estimated increase of PTA population that is predicted to increase by 3,518 persons be- tween 2005 and 2030 according to estimates provided by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the development of Collier County's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) described in detail in Section I of this market - conditions study (See pages I -7 -I -9). Tables 2.01 and 2.02 exhibited on the facing page document this growth by each TAZ located in the Primary Trade Area (PTA). Yv y E E O U m c c C m a m I C C N c q U UI E E O U h O O N m 9 m m C m d c O O V V N 0 .0 ME OE N 0 V m V N_ 0 C1 C C N R E E U h 0\ O N W No �O � '- ! h 00 VI V M I n V 0, 10 1� O N M �0 b- m N N h V O� M cd N'd 00 Q N N N co r h O N M M N V p N O O O O. O D, O O � C vi O O C h O CO N S ° m S 1, n -e b b O 00 0* n M M 00 N 10 N M M 0, v 00 I Y O 00 C; v °a N � M Q 8 O M M M V M %0 V I 1 N n Q O O M n 00 h 0\ M O m M N,T .- M° N Q�- N � M a b N 100 N S° h M� - a P `O � OND of S° ? ^ o M Nd v Nd �d o N S °. 00 S° O° O °, a s T M N -O C 06 - O O G 06 L Y N N �Mn M do O O rn 0 O M Q N �o N O1 Nd N W M N O. r K cy; ry Go n ^ DD � Q I� O Y1 P 00 n M 1 h 0 h n Q Q N O O N N N O O �O n m W M T O W w- of 00 Q n 1� N D V1 It 00 �- M Q r vt %0 00 -c N N M 1 N^ N Vf ^ Q N V 00 N b O 1l C %00 O N 00 O O O N �p ° ^ h Q N N N� N N N .N- N N r N Q M I Vf \0 1� rg -i cli 4i C4 Q OD M mi Q b o0 « m m _« « aVaV¢VaVaVamvVaV N M q v E V a V a V V i V c La EE ° v° v v v v 6 V °' L a Q Q Q Q u Q O Q Q d I N 0 N F- O°�nN 0� M N V1 O O O O O M O N O Q O O O Q O N N �O W O N O M M M V1 h 1� O 0 0 0 00 M N Q Q O O O V 00 D N N 0\ N Q N M \O v O O` O O M 00 N N D; O 1� W T 00 W �o N O 0 N O PN W W N ry I/1 W Q M 2 - N M Q� v C N V V lJ V V p V Ne V y E O E a O Q U ai C C J C v W a O 01 a u R A N U C d - E > O d V C 01 C -° E V `y O E c E ° O C O a c E c O m 9 0 0 m C d m A W E 1 � O m`� O C 0 O C V U O m u YO U C 0 0 c -0 O D m � ° 'a 0 c N a cv _ m m m ` V y m E m V J E E i V N Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -4 Land uses for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara's Primary Trade Area (PTA), derived from Collier County's 2005 Commercial Land Use Inventory, are exhibited on the following four (4) pages. Each exhibit is accompanied by a facing -page listing of land -use explanations provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser; listed land uses will assist the reader in identify- ing actual commercial activity conducted on the listed parcels or subdivi- sions. As noted above, the list of applicable 2 -digit codes from the Collier County Property Appraiser's—Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) Codes is provided to describe the listed land uses; all other relevant data is reported by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), and by commercial land -use categories now in effect in Collier County. Section 5 of this study includes a definitive listing of commercial land uses for the entirety of the Golden Gate Planning Community District. Commercial zoning district acreage analyzed by planning com- munity population is shown in Table 2.03 exhibited on the facing page. The analysis proves conclusively that the population of the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) is underserved by commercial en- terprises providing needed goods and services to PCD residents. The findings reported in Table 2.03 are persuasive in establishing that a Golden Gate PCD resident, when measured by an acres -p - capita standard. lacks shopping opportunities readily available, for example, to a resident of the North Naples PCD. Assessment of New Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Commercial Land Uses A careful reading of the commercial zoning listings for land -uses for the Primary Trade Area (PTA) is demonstrated on the four (4) pages of ex- hibits that follow. These exhibits will demonstrate clearly that parcels avail- able for commercial uses in the general area likely to be affected by prospec- tive new commercial uses under recently adopted provisions of the GGAMP, namely parcels within TAZ 199, are largely C -2 uses located on parcels of diminumous dimensions. These parcels are largely vacant, particularly those with dimensions of 0.14 acres or less. Parcels in TAZ 200 now devoted to rental properties, not owner - occupied residences, that will eventually become available for commercial use are unlikely to accommodate commercial structures larger than 2,200 to 2,400 square feet in size. Currently, there are no commercially zoned prop- erties listed in TAZ 200. Evaluating the future uses of these commercially - unzoned properties appears problematic and is well beyond the scope of this study. Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio /Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section II. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � L d O � O �� N N N N N W S N N Z. O V O O O Q LL's YmJ t0 f0 r� m� CN9 fp fQ0 f0 Ol O O � N M� Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M M M M M M pp yp gyp{ pp S S S S S S S LL L N N N N Np N Q tm'1 fm�l M f`m') Cmf fm�I LL tea° A O CM ff ti ti ti ti ti U d i ti U U d ti U U d ti d d ti u d ti ti d d U ti ti ti ti N S ti ti Q� � V T N � � � r r Q O ((Cpp �C�pp {C{pp (C(pp �C�pp (C(pp ryCry {C{pp (C(pp �C�pp (C(pp (C(pp (C(pp �C�pp ryCry (C(pp tCtpp �C�pp �C�pp (C(pp (C(pp (C(pp (C(pp ryC {Cp (Cp (Cp �Cp ryC (Cp Q IQ Q1 D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 m U U U m U U % Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue rDOR1 Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools ix Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas ix Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section II. ® N m M N Y1 m W o m m o m r h W W r W o o M W r M O N W m M ... 7 L b mC m r W r �yy m O N °m r m n m 0 0 0 N O Z O$ eW0 aWa uW'i a°D O aD O O N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m O O O m m O m O O O M M M O O O O O M M M M M N N N N M M M M M M M r M M N N N N N N M M M N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M 'o d m m m m m m m m m m m m m W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M e M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL q N N N N N Q N m M Q O Q 7 M CO O m M M M N r O 3a A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M Q Q q o g q Q Q ❑ D e e q 0000O 000 DOOOODMD66 o O O O W O O O N O O r V] W O O O m W M C N m O O m m O O C C C m C C O O O M O O O O m N N W O Q 1t'i Q e N Ol X 0 0 0 �Cp O O O m Cl! W m N N e� m 0 Q Q Q W �� h< d l0 N Q N N N W Q M u d N Q W m R N O N M N M M d N W m m h a' U. > > Q > > � m > > > o W (a 'O C O O^ r m` m m Y'1 N O N r M O ^' m �p q ^'' � .- .- r e r r r r � � N N N r N J � o° a c � O d = C9 U c � 0 a J m O • 7 i s N Z CC U C 2 J2 N N N h W O C7 d O O m _ c C C C ` CO) N Y_ E d O O lO L m C Q M m O m Y O '_ C m N N B O O O O O O O O O O O O O C d d m d O d d N M M m m ..0 r a 0 n U N o 6 0 0 `d W W W W W M M M M W m W m m Q Y d Q C O m N O) m o m O) m Q7 C C m W m W W W ^' ^' W W N d- d- N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y d Y toO Y Y Y O O 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a N Mn O m m m m m U m m m m G 6 m e 6 m m 16 h ui 16 i 16 m m m16 a m— m vi 16 (D ai id �o m so m r 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c =' 'c 'c 'c c c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c c c c c o 7 D > > > 7 7 > > > > > > D = � 7 7 n o n 'c .c .c > > > D > > > > > 7 ti ai ai m 6 m ai ti ai ai ti ti ti ti d ti E ai ai m 6 w si i a; 2 a' 2 s m N N N N 0 A N N N N N F (0 N N N E m N (0 N N A N N d d A d m d d d 0 0 C9 0 0 0 0 (9 0 0 0 0 C9 C9 U' 0 U 0 C9 C9 C9 (D U' 0 (9 (9 0 0 0 0 0 (9 (9 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 9 0 'O O 0 O O s O 'O O O 0 0 O 32 'O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 C O O 0 0 G 0 U (7 U (7 0 (7 (7 (7 0 0 0 0 C9 C9 ED 0 C9 C7 0 () U ED C9 0 U C9 C9 0 C9 oN m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N Q1 0 N N N m m m M m W W W N N N N N N N N N W N V •y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w m rn rn rn m rn m rn m W rn rn m m m m rn m m rn rn w m m rn m m rn m rn m o+ m C= N Q e Q Q e e e e e e e Q e Q Q Q e e e Q Q Q e e Q e Q Q Q e e e Q H CC 7 C N � O U U C7 U U C9 (7 C7 C7 C9 C9 C7 C9 U J U C7 C7 C7 C9 � C7 C9 C7 � C7 C7 C9 C7 U C7 C7 U (9 C7 � C9 d U Q C7 C7 C7 U C7 C9 C9 C9 C7 C9 C7 C9 C9 C9 W C7 (7 U' C7 C9 W C9 C7 C7 m C7 U C7 C9 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 W U' Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Proper Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television * "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section II. � osasoosoo ass 0 MI�� m M m m m m M m M m m LL N . u'. N . p . V N Cam` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Q Rt N C U U U U U U V U U U U v G N O ' n t00 N 0 N O A O m < � N V M N N N SLL W c `w C Cc J � C .0 E_ 7 > m 2 :p � d Cc y N O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eo ai ai of ao a ai ai ai si v a v a s< v a N N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m Ql m m m m m m Ql m QJ r r r Iz r n n 1 r I- 0 � c7 r d d d d d d d d d d d N N d d d N N N N N 0 0 0 c c c c c c c c c c c d d d d d d d d d d d 0 0 0 O a 0 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U' C9 0 0 0 U' C7 C7 C7 0 (7 o' o N a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NN N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 m m w m ro m m m m m m m p N N N N N N N N N y r N N m o m m m m m co m a m N N N N N N N N N N N F- C 7 �2 �2 m m^ p Moe FC_ C O O U Z 00 00 O O O O O O N S S O O Oa N S O t0�1 O O O O _O O O a N O O O M tp (p M M M M m M M m M tD t0 m m f0 M M M f0 N r r r C) r r r M Cp fD C) M M M M M M M M Y N Ol N N 'O N O 'O l7 V N! M p p O p p O p O p p O p p p p p p p 0 tfNpl p! d d A N W W N N S i>> i> > M d N h M N gy M! >> M D O a 0 U m c 0 N N m O Q � a o d U � dp d FL w � d a c m r W 0 LL N N d fp Q Q M m o v N W A N N V N N M V p r C J J p p r0 J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U .J V M co N N N N N N N N N R< [O M M M M M M M M tp r it C N N N N N N N N N N N N 6 d d F N Y Y Y Y Y_ Y Y_ Y Y_ Y Y_ S W _Y 61 m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N Vd m m p d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d N d d d d a m m m m m m m m m m m a as a a m m m C7 C7 0 cJ CD C7 0 CD 0 0 (D U' T T T T T 0 C7 U' a6 v w a1 w aCi w a a a a a a a c a a a a -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 5 c�c7 0 (D 0 cD 0 c7 0 0 cD a a a a a c7 c7 c� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn m m w w w m m m m m ro o m m m m m m w rn N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m o m o m m o m m o m m m m m m m m m cd N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rn m m a rn rn m rn a m rn rn rn w w m o+ m w rn v v v a v a v a v v a a e a c s a v a a N - - N C7 C7 p Cb C7 6 U' U' C7 C7 C7 U' C7 (7 C7 C7 6 6 6 m C7 C7 C7 (7 C7 p C7 U (7 U' C7 U U' N C7 C7 C7 C7 U U C7 H a U N FC_ C O O U Z Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property' Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio /Television * "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section Il. d � °— sEO °ssEo 7 0 y v o a p N Z C 0 LL ry N N W LL W W W W o� in o 0 0 0 r N u'1 O N C C 7 m m a l7 O N Q LL N J � m C ao E MP 7 > Z:5 �a a o O !, O IV O G N H U C O ) V O L H W C � Er d m o . IL 0 r m �n N N ~ `` l0 eN- u7 V1 N U 0 o O 3 W W Z F O O m' N N N 3 m x > > > § (O m W VI N N N t0 0 O N N N N t0 7 0 W W W W m m N O W N N N N N N N N N C C C C C C C O D V 00 O V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �M NtO tO CO O) 01 O) M (O CO tD rn o 0 0 N N N C1 t"J t'1 N N N N N N N N O fD ^y C C 0 0— �p C 0 J X m W C N O "O d J f0 0 N O C Q C y X > C V c N aci m �? n N Q •- T O C m N U H O> c N t g 0 u Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -9 Supportable Commercial Uses and Land Use Recommendations Substantial new residential construction, supported by the area's ex- panding roadway network, will likely accelerate demand for accessible, well - located commercial centers providing for the personal - service needs of future residents. Growing consumer pressures generated by new residents will likely foster additional demand for new commercial space, perhaps even exceeding the demand generated by residents being absorbed within the developing neighborhoods in the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA). The objective of this analysis is to assess the commercial development potential of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara and provide some degree of mar- ket justification. Consistent with this objective, it appears appropriate to de- velop a well - located multi - purpose commercial facility or facilities on the subject Colonnades site near the area's developing neighborhoods. In evaluating the commercial uses presently available to serve the fu- ture needs of area neighborhoods, this analysis has sought to address the following criteria to be employed during any plan- amendment or rezoning process to quantify the actual mix and variety of land uses surrounding the subject site's PTA in order that any proposed uses may be evaluated accord- ing to the following considerations: 1. Adequacy of available infrastructure capacity, particularly roads; 2. Existing patterns of land use in general proximity to the subject site; 3. The amount, type and location of existing zoned and developed commercial uses in general proximity to the subject site; and 4. Other criteria identified in the Land Development Code (LDC). The Colonnades At Santa Barbara site is well situated for use as a mixed -use facility that would allow land uses compatible with adjacent resi- dential areas. Located in proximity to a large platted urban community, it can serve as a transitional facility providing needed convenience services. Listed below are recommended land uses identified with a category number obtained from the Standard Industrial Classification Manuel (1987). Land Use Recommendations Collier County's General Commercial Zoning District lists the fol- lowing Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) groups that can be considered both consistent with the purpose and intent of applicable zoning standards and appropriate uses for development on the Colonnades At Santa Barbara site: • Building construction (SIC groups 1521 - 1542); Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -10 • Business services (SIC groups 7311, 7312,7334,7338,7342 - 7389); • Educational services (SIC groups 82 -8249, 8221, 8331); • Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (SIC groups 8711- 8748); • Depository institutions (SIC group 6021, 6022, 6091); • Eating and drinking places (SIC groups 5812 and 5813); • Health services (SIC groups 8011, 8021, 8082, • Insurance carriers (SIC groups 6311, 6321, 6324, 6321, 6331); • Membership organizations (SIC groups 8611, 8631, 8641, 8699); • Miscellaneous retail (SIC groups 5912, 5921, 5942, 5992, 5993, 5994, 5999); • Personal services (SIC groups7231, 7241, 7291, 7299); • Professional offices (SIC groups 6311 -6399, 6411, 6531, 6540, 6552, 6553, 6712 -6799, 8111); • Real estate (SIC groups 6531, 6541, 6552); • Social services (SIC group 8311); and • Any other commercial use or professional service that is compatible in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as may be determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Note: The Colonnades At Santa Barbara is ideally located to accom- modate the relocation plans of convenience and drug store outlets that would be well served by a highly visible, freestanding facility at a high- traffic location like the subject site. Section III will analyze retail market demand in the area surround- ing a proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA). Section IV will provide Study recommendations. Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. Section 2 - Exhibit 1 Inventory of Existing Commercial Land Uses: Golden Gate Planning Community District Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County PropeM Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio /Television * "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items eo' Q u'o QQ°io$N� �n `°nm m rn�Qm Nm mNgrnN N N$e mrmm NQ� $ O $m ,QN N p ryO� N 53 E jn �j p�j tOp (Np {�p N fp �Np Np �Np �Np tNp (Np �Np {Np tfpV (tp7 imp {Np {Np fNp �mOp Op f0 (mOp (p (p (p (p (p �p (p (Q� •o a LL 8 m om umi, mnri, gi, �.e -mod °� N N O � N �- OO O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (G� W J Q W C ❑ (y T 7 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C dcjU V tOy j V N O N Ur 0 C1 N ti(7 0W 00000 0 00 U U o o 00 Q U 0 Uo U W 0 0 Q 0 ti 0 0 0 U L) o o U L) L) R y a Y ok r C O U yt V 0 U W W W > � > U > W 08 "101>1110891 > > > N > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7 N LL o C y O^ m ($ m N O O O O O O O N^ O O O O O O O f O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m d C E w m s s H O r M Z N m O Cf y ts a W IL �- 'O o `O o o '0 0 0 0 0 'O o o `_o _d z o 6 0 _d 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 'o 6 0 0 `_0 0 6 0 `q S o 0 6 s:r ui� oil of 'n of o5 Cvi of di mh of vi m m m m m m mm� mm mai m rmmmmmmmai N ` H N N �2 A N N'^ N N �2 N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y W 3 [O [0 m m m [0 [O [0 m [O m m m m [O m m m 6] lL m m m m m m GO m [O m m m m m m N N e V N N i H N N NL'i N N N' N Ld N N ul tO 1C m m m m tO m& m f6 m m m m m tO m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C d d (7 (7 C7 C7 C7C7C7V m W a "i o W N m g W m W A W m W m W W d N d N m N d W d m d VW d m W W W N d W d Q1, m W W d d W C7C77CoCDCD07a 0a 0 CD (D a 007(70 CJ 00 a a 000 (D C70 C' C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C W W d W d d d d d W d d d d d W d d d d s 'W ' V a ' O 2 d d O d d d 'd d d 'd 9 d W W O W 2 d d o d o 2 o d 'd o 32 o o o o c o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o d m O m C7 C7 (7 (7 0 0 0 0 C7 0 C7 00 C7 0 C7 (7 0 (7 co C7 (7 0 0 (7 (7 0 0 C7 0 0 (7 0 0 0 (7 C7 00 C7 0 g m$ m rn m m m m m rn m m m rn rn m m rn rn rn m m m m m m m m m m m m m rn �i m m m m � rn a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a m rn rn m m m m m m m m m m m m rn rn rn rn m rn m N0 �2 t2 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Q C CL rn m m rn m rn rn m o+ rn rn m m m rn rn m rn rn rn m m m m m rn rn m m m m m rn m m m m rn m m m " 2 p L H m Q 0 T Z 0 C Ez N q N m N J C W N O C�1 O W O (V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d �dc��m7��777�c�77��777��77�7��77777��c�c7�777 0 ao¢a ma 77ma7��7 7�7777�7777��77777��77777777� R R R d CL CL m C LL m d v 0 Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND-USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [121 3] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio /Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items m m N N d N m m Z2 `O v O 0 o a LL N N N N N V r. O O O O O o o O O O o o W W J � W C N N N N N N N N N N N N N s U(S U L)b QQ0000U .i LL O' LL N D r � C � E—°m 1N6 2 D J2 N m g a m m d `p mm 4m.° -NNm wmmN 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o _o _o mW mm m m N N b N _ _ 0_m _ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m m m m m m m m m m m m m tD m Im m N� m f0 t0 m m C C C C C C C C C C C E m m m ai ti m m m m ti m m (7 U' U' U' c7 C7 U' C7 c7 c7 c7 U' m m m a� aci m m m m m m m o a p a p o v a a a a 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 mis(iCD (D CD 00 acD00 j� m m .. m m m m m m m m G m m rn rn m m m m m m m m N � N SIN N N N N N N N N N N N C 3 O F a C � W E d a c0 mmm m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N e v e c a e e a v a a a N N N N N N N N N N N N U' c7 c7 'U mc7 C7 c7U U' U' (7 $ oo ig5� m w 0 o g QnQ m Y Rmni3m tO�N ei `�i <NN NN� O m m m m m d d d C N UUU()(J8 m UUU N m n � r 7 N m� N m s E do m E Y V n a d Y m d to m _0 Y � m Y m 2 O m m N N m m E m E 0 0 000 c c U c c v v v o 0 0 @ 0 0 mma00 N N O` i a c� T c 0 R- Y m 0 n `o C m N m N N 0 Y Y 6mm m ai m 0 0 0 m m m P a 0 (07 col 0 v v e a e e a a U c7 U' c7GN c7 C7 c7 a ]C S N i+S��m �nnnmmc�i cyi c��rmi m� mm V m N [7 [7 m N N N N N N N N N N N N (NO, . N m d d d e d d d d d d d d g d d q d d d e d e UcSUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUC) C d C CN C C C C C C C C C C m C C m C C C M— m A m m w m m m m i m a imi m m 0 m m w > >>>>>>>9> > > >> i > > O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 7 0 0 0 h N N n W Y m y `c m V � N W O d m N O m Z u¢i v¢i vai E a Y Y Y 0 E r mmm c Z Q> a 000 1-a n o y — 2 2 Z e? s = m E E E w � Nmdmmromi ermine Y Q Q Q d V d d d d d d d d d d d m m6 V N h m n n n n n n n r r n n r n r n p O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mw N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 Ta 0 m 0 .�c7 CD U' c7 c7 c7 C7m U' c7 U' U' 0c7 U' c7 c7 U' U' m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m v a a a 0 a o 0 0 a o a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a a 4 4 a a p N m 0 U' 0 0 c7 0 <i C7 0 CD CD C7 U' 0 c7 0 0 CD 0 f7 n r n n n n n n r n r n r r n n r n r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ... N N N N N N N ... a e c e v a a a v v v a v e v v e e v a a v N m N N N N N IA In m In In m N 1(I YI T m N Vf m m m alI L�, R Gc7 c7 C7 'U U' c7 c7 c7 c7 U' c7 c7 c7 (7 C7 c7 c7 c7 U' Uc7 3 m m R a m C LL d m D O a i v v e a e e a a U c7 U' c7GN c7 C7 c7 a ]C S N i+S��m �nnnmmc�i cyi c��rmi m� mm V m N [7 [7 m N N N N N N N N N N N N (NO, . N m d d d e d d d d d d d d g d d q d d d e d e UcSUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUC) C d C CN C C C C C C C C C C m C C m C C C M— m A m m w m m m m i m a imi m m 0 m m w > >>>>>>>9> > > >> i > > O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 7 0 0 0 h N N n W Y m y `c m V � N W O d m N O m Z u¢i v¢i vai E a Y Y Y 0 E r mmm c Z Q> a 000 1-a n o y — 2 2 Z e? s = m E E E w � Nmdmmromi ermine Y Q Q Q d V d d d d d d d d d d d m m6 V N h m n n n n n n n r r n n r n r n p O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mw N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 Ta 0 m 0 .�c7 CD U' c7 c7 c7 C7m U' c7 U' U' 0c7 U' c7 c7 U' U' m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m v a a a 0 a o 0 0 a o a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a a 4 4 a a p N m 0 U' 0 0 c7 0 <i C7 0 CD CD C7 U' 0 c7 0 0 CD 0 f7 n r n n n n n n r n r n r r n n r n r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ... N N N N N N N ... a e c e v a a a v v v a v e v v e e v a a v N m N N N N N IA In m In In m N 1(I YI T m N Vf m m m alI L�, R Gc7 c7 C7 'U U' c7 c7 c7 c7 U' c7 c7 c7 (7 C7 c7 c7 c7 U' Uc7 3 m m R a m C LL d m D O a Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Properly Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [121 3] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items m m n N e E _ Z C g m(�c�i m`(%i�m(�mme�im m(�+�im`��`�i `�immm�mn�m`ei dim m(�iNmnm(�+ oi� mm mm o a LL �2 tp ((pp e- O (7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 9 Cp W O N Y cr N 9 J C C C 7 2 'C V N a `o O N F U d 0 0 C W Q CL C p L F h C 7 W Ed 'a L) e e e e v e e e e e e e e e e a e e a e e e e e v e e e e e e e v e e e e v e e e e e e UUU(SUIJUUUUUU V UUUUUUUUUUCS (S U(JUUUUUUUU(JUUCSUUUUU �m W 8 W W �i �m we`� -7mci��ti m N m m e (D m$ m m n n m N W? n W N V W W W N W W W W W N e N N m' m N N e O m m I� m� N e N N m e n > > > > > > > > > > > > > O n O O -N O m W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 N m N O& O N N N N N N e O m N N N e r r e- e r r '- � r r r N W W mC? e N rp C C p 2 2 O m N m C d r f m N Y Y y 4i p S `c S m e Y p N U U S m N A V W Z Z O O M V s U 9 U U N N t7 O V y m m n m m N m a A N ?� e _ " 9 � _ C Z Q d 3 3 0 0 0 Q O O O O O O O O O O O 9 m N Q Na W r Q Q Q U a CA m n n Z C Z m N LL�VV O Z Z O W W IL W W li lLL W W W W W W W 2 m S O m Y W W= W m m 25 E o E N 8 c E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1I((NII _O O O O U O O �p O O Q C C U V V C m m i5 ME m iE E5 m m Id m m m m m m m m W N 'yam N m lA N m 6 (7 N N O) N N Ol Cl N M m C6 N f/1 e V e e e e C6,6 m m C6 p e e eo U m a V w n n Y Y Y Y Y e e Y Y Y Y Y A A A A A A A A A W W A W W W d Y Y Y Y Y Y 6 A A A A W Y Y m m 3 m m m m m m 05 m m n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n m m m m m m m a a a a a n a¢ N N N N N N N N N N N lV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N z N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C d d d d d d d d d d d d m m d m m d d m d m W A m d d y m m r rd, mod„ rd N W W N A m W A rA rA m A m m A A N 0 rA W A W m A A A N A A 0 A A A rA A W A A A A A A W �rW 0000 00 C7 (7 07000 C7 (D 00 070000000000 C7 (70000000000000 00 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C d d d d d d d d A d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dd d d d d A d d d A d d N 'O 9 9 9 9 9 C C d d 9 9 9 V O 9 9 j'1 9 9 9 =1 9 9 9 72 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 933 9 9 9 9 gg Q 9 9 g y yW 8 (7 (7 (7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 (7 0 0 0 0 0 Oa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n n n n n n n r p n n n n n n n n r n n n n n n r n np n n n n n p n n n n n n n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a v v v e a a v v a v v e a o e e c a a v a a a c a e v v a v << v v a a v e v a a v v e T m N N T 19 H N L9 N N N N N N N L9 h N m N N O N N N 9 N T N m m T N YJ m Yl N N N N T T N m (7(7(70 (70(7000000000000000000(7( 707 (70(7 CJ (7 (7 (7 i7 (7 (7 (70(70007 (7 m o m m N m N N N 0 0 0 K) m m 0 0 u e > ; N O O N N N N N O S O C6 n Y Y Y F m m tW W W n n n N N N C Y C C C 41 m d (�c7� C C C d d d v 9 9 coo N N N NM4 N N N m m m e e e m (O m (loo y m R IL ca C LL m 0 O Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND-USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System, and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue fDOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [121 3] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous' 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items C7 N U' W 7 w ar u rn a (p LL m m 0 C7 npn m p }${ n N N NM'e�.} N N N � N a N � N g 2O m mN m mN m mcyN m m moi m m m moi m cmi e�i�mmn CL rn W r rn W m 0 rn W [ [h m < < N N N N N N m n LL < O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ F F O ttpp (p �p (p (p tp NN N N Il O N M m Q< t0 f7 CJ V fWO, INS, V f'1 IIR n n pp N N N Q UU 8 OO O O O O O O O O O W O O O O W qp B BU pmU BU U h N b V V N 0 V N t0 m m Vl N N N t C N Q W m 1[I m m IO m m m N m m N O T N N T N m N V<< V ON C U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UQQ U U Ugg U U 0 0 0 U N a g Q mg S g Ik 25 O >; Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System, and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DORI Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -in Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous' 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items E 2 O O C LL J Q O N d cr y a C O W � S Z � v� N a `o O Q N Q f d O N c O H G 8Q g Nqq O N N N O O N S e w m N �irn�mm §mto N m O m C1 N N N n O e — 0 6 0 0 w— o e e e g o 0 o e e dCSUUUad aUU 0 6 0 Y U f pp N OI � nl t� 0 m l > > > O N � m N N 0 0 0 m n a 0 U � 9 2 N Ur e J J N p C6 E D1 O O N N U 3'0305 ,N rn N w N rn rn rn c O Y Y S S Y Y Y Y O O CO m mUmmmm nn m �m roro.e tcro�fO DDDDnlllDD N a ry a a a a a a a wwwwmw'id N d m m 0 0 d m m 0 007 0 0 007 0 a co a C7 C7 m m a m m m m m f0 (LI rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn m m m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m 55ggNg5�� QyV, a }4N{ �qm{ . qXN � QmQ y�QpnS{ q t`Qi m cy'i �i �i N N< N N V N t N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O e e e e e e e e e e e e (>UUCJUUUCJUUUU " n O N O N m O N w a m N N N — — N N N N �- �- �- N N N � m a N N r t ey N w CN m p. n �- O m O O my O O p O O my O tp Op O O N N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m l0 CD � rn m m m fD Cfl (D CD r c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c N a a a a a a a m a N a w 0 m mm w w wwmm C C C C C C C C C C C C v a a a a a m m o o a a 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a 0 C7 a C70 C7 U 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m N m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m rn m rn rn m m rn m rn e e e e e e e e e e e e O C C d ° E C CJ ' C7 C7 C7 C7 CD (7 (7 C7 C7 w N C7 C7 G C7 C7 (7 C7 U U U(7 �C7 0 CC7 J 0 N C7 UU Q N n ti x x 8oIog$$mg� tm0 tN0 m m t l; t? � t0, m O N m O N N O O O O O O O OO N O a a a a a a a a a a a a O O C CO C C C C , CWy, C O O e e O O O O O p O O O O n CQ V N C O N m O e0 R a U id a !q a w id L' vY a a a n L m N N a m .a `o Y S N m e m n m O J J J O O (_�J O O O O O O a c clNNNNMmtti Mao N N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y C C C C C C C C C C C C a d a m d a a a a a a a W W N va m m m m m m w N C C C C C C C C C C C C m m v m m m m m m m m m v m g s o a o 32 a o v 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 65-5-5-6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 C7 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m a m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N a e e a e a a v v a v °� 7 � � r' r' �2 �2 �2 O 77 7 x n n n n n 0 0 0 o m m N N b N O N N a a a a a a a `N t1Oi m 8 2 o m> uNi NN > m O m m N^ O m e N t J J O O O tp O m 0 0 -6 N N U .6 U ;E V Y Y n E n n, Y S2 a a a a a W mn mn ani a° ani t6 tc m id a id m m d a a a a a a m wmwm00a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 C7 C7 (7 (7 C7 C7 (7 U x R d CD a a C LL m v Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County ProperLyAppraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [121 3] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non- professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution ix Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television * "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items E 7 z Q O LL C W Q C N d W Q N 9 C J E z Z v a O N U) C _. 0 O F C O Er A a v e m N W N m m N N N N O O V °N r N S N N Y S N r C1 a< m S ( o pD N ^ S b G 0 o O _ N N `- So " N p r o O S S m O 2j655 8 p p 8 V m S S N m N �fef V V' V d e Ne O W W W N N W W W N N N m W W N N N NO N N m m m m m m m m m m m r r r^ r r r r r r^ N N N h pJ (O Ol W W W m W W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m <O O1 a N yy mm m N O T m O q m N W O m N m N M N O O r Q m fe0, N N tr0 S O OOi O n O N N N O N tq m {y ^ e 0 6 N W O N o o0; CJ N N O O^ � � O O N N ❑ p p p O p O O p p NN e e e C o c o p o m m o O o m m o o 7- W 7 > > > > a a a a a a a a a ai U U U U ti a a a s 7 p a a a a a a a a a a a ti ff t p W ^ p p m C fm0 N y W q Cm Cm CQ Q N O W N N r 1` N O e N-e m mC A qC O' U m 0 �Cp U N { �Cp m e U U U U U tJ U U m m U U CJ O! {'Ty W t0 N R U U f7 N N {tp7 {T� (r'1 i to 1� N i 7 i i %< i i N O O O N N N N O O O! N O m 0 N O O O O O N O O O N O O N N m R Ln Ln a ? ti M O m O O E E = T p p 7 EE p U U O W 0 N m d_ m m m L. L12 � U W W W 0 0 0 0 0 Jj 0m O Q m W ^2 _ 0 0 'm 'm m m a a a m m '0 0 0 _W N W OI W W W= Q a� � � N s °�s a aaaaat6 $aaaaa_ os g ameeaLC a O W � V @@ a @@ p 0 T C Q Q&= Y Y _ L6 16 4 _- m m m o o g o S s R O @ - - MM �a °w' n0000aaaaa a`iommm0`0 0m ` E E E E a U U U U U U U U V [0 V m m = d d m d m m m m m d m CFl Y Y Y Y Y m ( o o U C 32 2 2 2 2 L m m m m m m m m m m m m m W W lia �mO E E E E E E E E E E E n o. C m ` 2m L . 9 9 2 m O $ _ m V U m m m ^ U U U U U U V U E E 12 0 N m 0 0 g W 0 d 0 d O m e e m Ni N N N N N N N N N N N m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N e e O, m m m m N N C (� N N N N N N N (p m m m m m m m m m m N m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m a W mmm W W W W m W e e e e e e e e e e m m e e W W m e e e m W W W e e e e m mmm m W W W W W W e e e e e v e e e e e m m e e W N V cb m N r r m m m m W W W Q O O O O O o O o 0 0 o p N h 0 m m m m m m m m m m yy p m N N N N N N N N N N N r N N R C7N C f7 U(7 C7 C7 (7 (7 (7U C7N V V (7N UC7 (7N U(7 U' V m U UU U(7 C7 (7 (7 (7 V V N (7V x x x x x x x Appendix A-1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Proper Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television " "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items E z Z `e O 1a •o a LL 3a C N d O LL N W d J 0 7 a E 7 Z V a 00 N N Q C N .= C C H C_ 7 •C E C E a a d U C Q�mj m 8N dp om m d m Q��• `�Q�S NQ�j � m Q�Nj d O m n d m O �pn O C3 WI •Q�N•�QdS m N� O f0 O(py mfppp N Qd (`s�� (�pmp {�pmp p��Qmj _p �Qp fpON N N N N R N N� N m e r n n r r n n r n n n r�D� n r n n n n n r m 63 YYS o y m m fm0 [m0 m m m m m m m w (mO m m m m m N N N N N N N N [NO !NO O O V V m m V e e< d 1 N O O N N N T O OI Q O W tq IT M ID W t7 N d e Q tmD Q O< e cc O O It 6 0 0 0 6 0 N 0 0 0 0 OO O m N m 0 m n O O N 0 M 00 N 7 7 7 7 r r 7 7 ❑ = Doom ____ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ _____ _ _= N N U U U U U U O D U U O D U U U U U U O D U U O a a a a a a a a a a a a a C C C Em �mCm C Cm C C CW Cm Cq Cm Cmm Cm Cm Cmm 'E Cm C�pp O C C C m Cm m C W 0 m k 8 N m m W m q m m � U U U U J U U U U U U U U U U m U U U U WCW m U U N m U y n m N d N >>>>>>> % 7 % % % % 7 m Oml > , n N •- m 1� I� X10 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q 0 N m N N m V W O m r N m T T T T T m V u D W W m m m m m m m¢ m m¢ o r a a @ @ r T $ o `o m ❑ ❑❑ ❑� T T T T T ¢ 0 N m 9 O O W .15 m N i0 t0 W ¢ ❑ 0 0 0 6 6 .t E v Om Om o Om m m W n m ` O � O O o O mm m ii ii j"i v w m m m m m m a m m U U U U c c c -- m m o c r m cm gm 0 m n W m m m m A N m m m no y w. N N h ❑_ ❑_ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ____ = Z C4 6 m of v6 vi �j ui vi vi ui ,�; �c m Ld W W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 'x m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U ❑ -e ..... m m m m m m m C m m - ,l. r C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 'C C C C m E$ W m L t _� _m _�_p _m _m _W _p _ _ _ __p _m =p 0,-Mw L L L L L mY$ m m f m m {_p gymm�..]] �NNpp mNN Am�yy �NNpp N ��.pp.]] N N mNN N N N ryWmry my N N N N W W N l0 W l0 m m �[j (� C a m my mmm m m m m m m m ig 41 N W N N 0 0 m N W m W a a a a a S L p m W W wwmrn "ern w... a o+o,.... wrnrn rn ma �a npon m m m m m m m 3 a s 0 0 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 5 c c c c 'C L 'C L W m L L m m (D _a v o a_ g v a_ m T `Z°, nnnnnnnnnnnn n nnnn 3 2 '. ¢ W� m m(D mmm mm w m mm mm (/gym l/J D) Nm N to °g O Q S o0 rE -C -a >>>>> c ' W N o E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E _E E E E S U n a a a a a a a aaaa a aW a a a a a a a N 6 N !' r N 3 0 0 0 U w O zp N tD N N �[l m m m m N N m VI m N m m m N m m O m� (d0 [dD m tm0 O N (O ID m 1O (zpp (D (D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M m M M M Cd M M M M M M M m d d d d m N m m N m N N m m Om'J Cm) m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N m m m m N N N N m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N m m N N rn rn m m m m rn m m m m m rn rn m m a rn m m m d d d d d d d d d d d d d e d e d d e d d o m 0 0 0 0 m m m m 0� om 0 0 0 0 0 m m N m m ID 0 0 m m m O t0 N W O m m m m n r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a m N N m m m m O N N N N N 5. m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N oCD W 0 C57 7c�D d 7 7 7m z o C7 C7 C7 U' C7 C7 C7 U' UC7 C7 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U(7 C7N H C7N N 00 U C7N N (7 U' C7 C7 C7 C7 UC7N S S a7 C7 4 3 k d m rn m 0. R LL m O C7 Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR1 Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio /Television * "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items r � o a Z 0 ca ml N (O V L o a LL N m o O � O '010 r N (C� J Q � C N N N m m m m m m Q L L L L L L nnnnnn � t+)e N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m° ry a a a a a a y G t Y 6 V e e e W W W m m d C 0 N o a o m m d m m m 't'� '� '� c c c c c c N N a m m d O O C O O O 9 WC J C E 2O �a V y a` o N m p m � J m dmc 0 0 n N n o Z m m+ « ^m W W N w w w m m m a aQ o g m m 0 z z z d O N N cm N d C N N N C T CC � •C. E fO °'gi, °oo,a m °mm,uri, L6SmM�g��NO,goNOggmc°'i,o$ °o, °o, ei, N N N O� O N ❑ ❑ 0❑❑❑❑❑ 0 0 0 0 0❑ 0 0❑ w Q Q 0 w w w w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r N N N O N O e N N V OJ U y N h N N N O N p 0 N e V N (O N sI C; ' Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -1 IIl. RETAIL DEMAND FORECASTS The analysis of retail demand in the Primary Trade Area (PTA) begins with population and household -size projections derived from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) high -range es- timates and applied to the County's respective planning - community districts by the Comprehensive Planning Section. BEBR's countywide totals were disaggregated based on the share of growth in the Planning Community District (PCD) area included in a Pri- mary Trade Area (PTA). Per - capita- income (PCI) data is derived from Woods &Poole Eco- nomics, Inc. and PCI forecasts are in "constant" 1996- dollar amounts. Ex- penditure estimates are incorporated into a step -by -step analysis of commer- cial acreage and square footage required to satisfy forecasted demand. Demand calculations are based upon documented sales- per - square- foot (SPF) for commercial space and a density determination, expressed as a floor -area ratio (FAR), to predict the acreage requirement for the area under study. A Commercial Demand Study (October, 2003) conducted by the County's Comprehensive Planning Section reassessed early estimates pro- vided by the Reynolds, Smith & Hills (RSH) Market and Commercial Land Use Study (May 1988). The reassessment improved the rigor and appropri- ateness of this analysis. Analysts examining the retail - demand calculations that follow should be mindful of the important definitions listed below. Sales Per Square Foot (SPF): For 1986, determined to be $175.09 based upon the total measurable sales for the year of $1,008,788,987 divided by 5,761,514 million square feet (sq. ft.) of commercial space according to the 1988 Market and Commercial Land Use Study (page II -40). For 1995, sales per square foot was determined to be $220.87 according to calculations made by the County's Comprehensive Planning Section and based upon 1995 Collier County measurable sales of $3,223,592,288 divided by 14,594,655 sq. ft. of commercial space (Unincorporated County: 10,347,911 sq. ft.; City of Naples: 4,246,744 sq. ft.). The SPF calculation provided in the 2003 Study reflects property - appraiser defined land uses that correspond closely to the Census' definition of retail -sales outlets. The 2003 Study determined SPF to be $223.56 based on projected retail sales of $3,431,270,000 and a countywide commercial square- footage estimate of 15,348,589 square feet. For the purposes of the retail- demand calculations that follow, SPF is rounded up to $225.00 leading to a more conservative demand forecast. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR).: Defined as the percent of lot coverage, or the ratio of retail floor area to overall land area, determined by the 1988 Market and Commercial Land Use Study to be: 17.26 percent in 1986, expressed as a ratio of 0. 1726, and estimated to be 0.1765 in 1990. As an example of a con- tinuing readjustment of the FAR, the County's Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion recalculated the FAR in 1995 to represent 17.85 percent for the Urban Estates Planning Community District (PCD), or a ratio of 0.1785. The 2003 County study has reassessed the previous findings reported above and determined that the FAR for areas selected by the County for study ranged from 18.82 percent to 21.65 percent depending on whether ho- tels /motels and theaters are included or excluded from the analysis. Corre- spondingly, a "rounded -off' FAR of 20.00 percent was utilized in the conver- sion of supportable square feet to supportable acreage. For the purposes of this analysis, a FAR of 0.200 will be utilized for the years 2000 to 2010. Twenty (20) percent of any subject site or parcel will be considered as the floor space of a commercial structure and the remaining 80 percent will, presumably, be devoted to secondary uses, namely landscaping, open space, parking, and stormwater management. -- Dwelling Units (DU): An estimate calculated by dividing projected population by persons - per - household data from the 2000 U.S. Census for the period 2000 to 2010. Dwelling Unit Income (DUII: An estimate calculated by multiplying per capita income by persons - per - household. Total Area Income (TAI): An estimate calculated by multiplying by dwelling -unit household income by the number of dwelling units. Retail Expenditure (RE) Forecast: Determined by the 2003 Study to be 35.00 percent of total personal income. The 35- percent share of personal in- come is applied to TAI to forecast retail expenditures for the study areas for each of the analyzed time periods: 2000, 2005, and 2010. Retail Demand Calculation (RDC): Calculation of the acreage required to satisfy forecasted retail demand according to sales per square foot and FAR is determined by application of the following procedures: 1. Dividing projected sales by sales per square foot to determine support- able square feet; 2. Multiplying supportable square feet by 1.05 for the normal 5 percent vacancy factor; and 3. Dividing the total square feet by 43,560, the square feet in an acre, and _ the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.200 to determine the acreage require- ment for the study area. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -3 The resulting calculation of retail demand depicts the difference be- tween the existing, zoned commercial acreage and the forecasted demand for each year of the analysis. The analysis assumes that any forecasted deficits for later years, 2015 and 2020, are too subject to estimating errors to docu- ment properly any growing deficit of actual acreage and the estimates of likely new retail demand generated by population increases after the year 2010. Planning Considerations and Problem Setting Unique features related to the site of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara deserve special consideration in planning for new commercial retail uses at that location. The Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the subject site established in Section I and Section II of this Study has been determined to be well lo- cated to serve the goods and services needs of the surrounding residential communities, within convenient travel distance to the site, and the traveling public. The site's location on Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886) situates it per- fectly next to a well - traveled arterial road that is used extensively by resi- dents of the Urban Estates commuting from their residence to their work at Naples -area businesses. This "pass -by" traffic will likely create traveler inter- est in using a convenience retail facility on the site. Consequently, this retail- demand analysis will commence with Table 3.01 providing estimates based on growing demand in the Golden Gate Cen- sus Designated Place (CDP), also known as Golden Gate City. A complemen- tary analysis calculating retail demand in the Urban Estates will follow in Table 3.02 Table 3.01 COMMERCIAL LAND -USE DEMAND CALCULATION (2000 -2010) Estimated Supportable Acreage Growth in the Golden Gate CDP Population Projections Per Capita Income (PCI) Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PP Dwelling Units (DU) Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) Total Area Income (TAI) Retail Demand Forecast: 2000 20,951 $15,923 DU) 3.21 6,518 $51,113 $333,154,534 Retail Expenditures (RE) $116,604,087 Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) $225.00 Supportable Square Feet (SSF) 518,240 Supportable Sq. Ft. (5% vacant) 544,152 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.200 Supportable Acreage (SA) 62.46 2005 25,401 $17,296 3.21 7,010 $55,520 $389,195,200 $136,218,320 $244.00 558,272 586,186 0.200 67.28 2010 27,422 $18,713 3.21 7,501 $60,069 $450,577,569 $157,702,149 $264.00 597,357 627,225 0.200 72.00 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -4 Collier County's 2003 Commercial Demand Study concludes that: "In short, these findings suggest that population and income growth can sup- port additional commercial space within the Golden Gate (Urban Estates) area. However, other factors deserve careful consideration when interpreting these results. Namely, availability of real estate immediately adjacent to the study areas is recognized (as a factor) in helping to serve retail needs." Further, the 2003 Study advises that: "The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) defines a Neighborhood Center as possessing a primary trade area of 3 miles or less and a Community Center as one pos- sessing a primary trade area of 3 -6 miles. ICSC also gives a site acreage range of 3 -15 acres for Neighborhood Centers, and 10 -40 acres for Community Centers." The rapid growth of the Urban Estates requires a recalculation of retail demand that will reflect its burgeoning population. Table 3.02 makes that recalculation. Table 3.02 represents Urban Estates demand based on 2005 population estimates provided by Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Section. Table 3.02 COMMERCIAL LAND -USE DEMAND CALCULATION (2000 -2010) - Estimated Supportable Acreage Growth in the Urban Estates In sum, the calculation demonstrates that the Urban Estates will have a deficit of 70.24 acres in zoned commercial acreage by 2010, an increase of 60.53 acres over the 9.71 -acre deficit based on earlier estimates of the Urban Estates population released earlier by Collier County's Comprehensive Plan- ning Section (Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Commercial Demand Study Golden Gate Urban Estates Planning Commu- nity, October, 2003). 2000 2005 2010 Population Projections 16,713 35,606 57,484 Per Capita Income (PCI) $28,117 $30,541 $33,041 Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PPDU) 2.46 2.46 2.46 Dwelling Units (DU) 6,794 14,474 23,367 Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) $69,168 $75,131 $81,281 Total Area Income (TAI) $469,926,169 $1,087,444,068 $1,899,289,856 Retail Demand Forecast: Retail Expenditures (RE) $164,474,159 $380,605,424 $664,751,449 Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) $225.00 $244.00 $264.00 Supportable Square Feet (SSF) 730,996 1,559,858 2,517,998 Supportable Sq. Ft. (5% vacant) 767,546 1,637,851 2,643,898 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.200 0.200 0.200 Supportable Acreage (SA) 88.10 187.99 303.48 Zoned Commercial Acreage +233.24 +45.25 (70.24) In sum, the calculation demonstrates that the Urban Estates will have a deficit of 70.24 acres in zoned commercial acreage by 2010, an increase of 60.53 acres over the 9.71 -acre deficit based on earlier estimates of the Urban Estates population released earlier by Collier County's Comprehensive Plan- ning Section (Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Commercial Demand Study Golden Gate Urban Estates Planning Commu- nity, October, 2003). t3 b C%] o W r: O U � O a � 0 U W W Q Y 0 a m m n I n o I o X X O O m m 0 0 d d I I 0 � va z --�i- N d T d N BR wW f NP COWER (AUNTY n m vi T a d c7 z J� WT O�% d U DME CWNtt (XIWER CWNtt 3 a Go N T d CO Q o° a � o Q� T d O d T ° T O z c p d J T h. J d �co i lS6 115 � o m a N 816 ¢ 0 S4-1 C) s cq d tg O N T o f Hp o Cl) In n 3 tz[C d zo fCl) !1 t7 ° z d T Y� Mm QJ �In C0 C. °Ya d�a �F d i i Cl) oz � v �! i m° of nv� Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page I1I -5 At the time of this writing, the only recent effort to add commercial capacity to the Urban Estates planning community was the Board of County Commissioners approval in 2005 of a plan- amendment petition for the Van- derbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict permitting retail and other uses at the northeast corner of CR -881 and CR -862. As yet, no de- velopment activity has commenced within the new Subdistrict. The next step in the demand analysis is to evaluate retail demand in the Zip Code of the Study's Primary Trade Area (PTA). The population, per- sons per dwelling unit, and per capita income data were derived from the U. S. Census reports for Postal Zip Code Area 34116 (See attached Fact Sheet - American Factfinder - Zip Code Tabulation Area 34116 and Collier County Zip Code map). The following Table 3.03 estimates retail demand in Postal Zip Code Area 34116 only (See map on facing page). The rate of population growth was calculated to reflect the pace of growth in the host Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District of over 22.00 percent for both 5 -year periods in Table 3.03 below: Table 3.03 COMMERCIAL LAND -USE DEMAND CALCULATION (2000 -2010) Estimated Supportable Acreage Growth in Zip Code Area 34116 Population Projections Per Capita Income (PCI) Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PP Dwelling Units (DU) Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) Total Area Income (TAI) Retail Demand Forecast: Retail Expenditures (RE) Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) Supportable Square Feet (SSF) Supportable Sq. Ft. (5% vacant Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Supportable Acreage (SA) 2000 25,170 $17,756 DU) 3.09 8,137 $54,866 $446,444,642 $156,255,625 $225.00 694,469 ) 729,193 0.200 83.70 2005 30,707 $19,287 3.09 9,938 $59,597 $592,274,986 $207,296,245 $244.00 849,575 892,054 0.200 102.39 2010 37,462 $20,867 3.09 12,124 $64,479 $781,743,396 $273,610,189 $264.00 1,036,402 1,088,222 0.200 124.91 At the time of this writing, ascertaining zoned commercial acreage within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) component of Postal Zip Code Area 34116 cannot be calculated easily for 2005 and 2010 until pending EAR - based and other private sector amendments to the Collier County Compre- hensive Growth Management Plan are considered and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -6 For the year 2000, the closest calculation of zoned commercial acreage was based on 1998 data from the Property Appraiser and would not reflect accurately actual conditions at the time of the 2000 U. S. Census, the basis for the well- documented data provided in Table 3.03 for the year 2000. Section IV will provide Study recommendations. Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. Table DP-1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida [For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total population .......................... 20,951 100.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population .......................... 20,951 100.0 SEX AND AGE Hispanic or Latino (of any race) ................ 7,781 37.1 Male ............................... ......... 11.055 52.8 Mexican.............. ..................... 3.529 16.8 Female ............................. ......... 9,896 47.2 Puerto Rican ............................... 765 3.7 Under 5 years ........................ ....... 1.815 8.7 Cuban ..... ............................... Other Hispanic or Latino .................... 1,660 1,827 7.9 8.7 .. 5 to 9 years ..................... ........ 1,818 8.7 Not Hispanic or Latino ....................... 13,170 62.9 s 10 to 14 years ................ .. ......... .... 1,656 7.9 White alone. 10,402 49.6 15 to 19 years ............. ... ........... .. 1.710 8.2 ............................... 20 to 24 years ............................... 1,735 8.3 RELATIONSHIP 25 to 34 years ............................... 3,927 18.7 Total population .......................... 20,951 100.0 35 to 44 years ............................... 3,620 17.3 In households........... ..................... 20,922 99.9 45 to 54 years ...................... ......... 2,112 10.1 Householder ............................... 6,518 31.1 55 to 59 years ...................... ......... 707 3.4 Spouse .... ....... .................. 3,557 17.0 60 to 64 years ............................... 555 2.6 Child................. ........ ............. 6,679 31.9 65 to 74 years .................. ......... .... 733 3.5 Own child under 18 years ................ 5,509 26.3 75 to 84 years ............................ ... 459 2.2 Other relatives ..... ........................ 2,017 9.6 85 years and over ......................... ... 104 0.5 Under 18 years......................... 575 2.7 Median age ( years) ............... .......... ... 29.6 (X) Nonrelatives ............................. .. 2,151 10.3 Unmarried partner.. . . ................... 515 2.5 18 years and over ............... ............. 14,653 69.9 In group Quarters ............................. 29 0.1 Male... ................. . 7,805 37.3 Institutionalized population................... - - Female ..... ............................. .. 6,848 32.7 Noninsthutionalized population............... 29 0.1 21 years and over ..... .............. .......... 13,633 65.1 62 years and over ............................ 1.593 7.6 HOUSEHOLD BY TYPE 65 years and over .......................... . 1,296 6.2 Total households ......................... 6,518 100.0 Male ....... ............................... 577 2.8 Family households (families)................... 5,012 76.9 Female ..... ............................... 719 3.4 With own children under 18 years.......... 2,906 44.6 Married-couple family ....................... 3,557 54.6 RACE With own children under 18 years .......... 2,027 31.1 One race ........... .. ....................... 20,049 95.7 Female householder, no husband present..... 691 13.7 White ...... ............................... 16.132 77.0 With own children under 18 years .......... 594 9.1 Black or African American ................... 2,126 10.1 Nonfamily households ........................ 1,506 23.1 American Indian and Alaska Native........... 80 0.4 Householder living alone .................... 954 14.6 Asian ...... ............................... 149 0.7 Householder 65 years and over............ 243 3.7 Asian Indian ............................. .......... .. ......... Chinese........ .... 50 25 0.2 0.1 Households with individuals under 18 years ..... 3,243 49.8 Filipino ........................... . ...... 22 0.1 Households with individuals 65 years and over .. 949 14.6 Japanese ............................ .... - Average household size....................... 3.21 (X) Korean ..................... ............. Average family size.. . .............. . 3.44 (X) Vietnamese ....... ........ ............... 32 0.2 Other Asian ............................ 13 0.1 HOUSING OCCUPANCY Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander.... 25 0.1 Taal housing units ....................... 7,010 100.0 Native Hawaiian .......................... - - Occupied housing units ....................... 6,518 93.0 Guamanian or Chamono .................. 23 0.1 Vacant housing units.......................... 492 7.0 Samoan .. ............................... 1 - For seasonal, recreational, or 210 30 Other Pacific Islander ....... ..... ....... 1 - occasional use............................ 282 4.0 Some other race ........................... 1,537 7.3 Two or more races ........................... 902 4.3 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) ............. 1.0 (X) Rental vacancy rate (percent) .................. 4.1 (X) Race alone or in combination with one or more other races: ' HOUSING TENURE White ........ ............................... 16,607 79.3 Occupied housing units.................. 6,518 100.0 Black or African American ..................... 2,592 12.4 Owner- occupied housing units ................. 3,744 57.4 American Indian and Alaska Native ............. 138 0.7 Renter - occupied housing units................. 2,774 42.6 Asian ........ ............................... 197 0.9 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific islander...... 46 0.2 Average household size of owner - occupied units. 3.16 (X) Some other race ............................. 2,280 10.9 Average household size of renter-occupied units. 3.28 (X) - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. R Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more of the other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000. V.S. Census Bureau 7.9557% Table DP-2. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000 geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida ,Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text) Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent SCHOOL ENROLLMENT NATIVITY AND PLACE OF BIRTH Population 3 years and over Total population .......................... 21,012 100.0 enrolled in school .................... 5,546 100.0 Native........ ............................... 13,980 66.5 Nursery school, preschool ..................... 360 6.5 Bom in United States .............. _ ........ 13,486 64.2 Kindergarten .................. ............... 487 8.8 State of residence ...... ...- .............. 5,686 27.1 Elementary school (grades 1- 8) ................ 2,755 49.7 Different state ............................ 7,800 37.1 High school (grades 9-12)... .................. 1,398 252 Bom outside United States.................. 494 2.4 College or graduate school .................... 546 9.8 Foreign born ................. _ .............. 7,032 33.5 Entered 1990 to March 2000 .............. 4,949 23.6 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Naturalized citizen ............ . ............. 1,271 6.0 Population 25 years and over.......... 12,401 100.0 Not a citizen ....................... _... ... 5,761 27.4 Less than 9th grade .......................... 1,523 12.3 9th to 12th grade, no diploma .................. 2,497 20.1 REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN High school graduate (includes equivalency) ..... 4,197 33.8 Total (excluding born at sea) .............. 7,032 100.0 Some college, no degree ...................... 2,296 18.5 Europe....... ............................... 221 3.1 Associate degree ............................. 527 4.2 Asia ......... ............................... 203 2.9 Bachelor's degree ................... ......... 977 7.9 Africa ... ....... .......... .... _.. _.._.. .. _.. 8 0.1 Graduate or professional degree ............... 384 3.1 Oceania........... _ ........................ 5 0.1 Latin America ........... ... .. ................ 6,528 92.8 Percent high school graduate or higher ......... 67.6 (X) Northern America. . .... . 67 1.0 Percent bachelors degree or higher............ 11.0 (X) LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME MARITAL STATUS Population 5 years and over .............. 19,291 100.0 Population 15 years and over.......... 15,643 100.0 English only ........................ _ _. _. _ 11,027 57.2 Never married ............................... 5,028 32.1 Language other than English .................. 8,264 42.8 Now married, except separated ................ 8,062 51.5 Speak English less than "very well" _ ...... 5,393 28.0 Separated ....................... _ .......... 368 2.4 Spanish........... ... ... ............. ..... 6,504 33.7 Widowed ................. _ .. 509 3.3 Speak English less than "very well" ........ 4,493 23.3 Female ....... .. .. .. .. ... ... ........ .... ... 478 2.7 Other Indo-European languages ... 1,523 Z9 Divorced ................ .. .................. 1,676 10.7 Speak English less than "very well" ........ 790 4.1 Female ..... ............................... 911 5.8 Asian and Pacific Island languages. _ ......... 180 0.9 Speak English less than "very well" ....... 71 0.4 GRANDPARENTS AS CAREGIVERS ANCESTRY (single multiple) Grandparent living in household with . . Total population ........................ 21,012 100.0 oneea more own grandchildren under Total ancestries reported 19,046 90.6 ..... /8 years............andch 488 100.6 ................... dren Grandparent responsible for grandchildren ...... 720 24.6 Arab.. ........ ........... .. .. ... .......... 41 0.2 Czech'... ...... 79 0.4 VETERAN STATUS Danish . .. . . . . . . ........... . ............... 115 0.5 Civilian population 18 years and over .. 14,646 100.0 Dutch ...................... . ....... . ........ 114 0.5 Civilian veterans ............................. 1,357 9.3 English.......... .... ... _.. -. ....._..... ..... 1,095 5.2 French (except Basque)' ...................... 294 1.4 DISABILITY STATUS OF THE CIVILIAN French Canadian' ................ . . . ..... . .. 172 0.8 NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION German ...... ............................... 1,978 9.4 Population 5 to 20 years ............... 5,637 100.0 Greek. .......... _....................... 65 0.3 y .............................. With a disability 674 12.0 Hungarian .......................... . ........ 87 0.4 Irish' 1.844 7.8 Population 21 to 64 years .............. 12,417 100.0 Italian......... _.... ...... ..... ............. . 825 3.9 With a disability .............................. 4,010 32.3 Lithuanian ......... ..................... 40 02 Percent employed .......................... 71.7 (X) Norwegian...................... _...... ..... 66 0.3 No disability .. ............................... 8,407 67.7 Polish...... .............. .... .. ...... ...... 407 1.9 Percent employed ........ .. ....... .... ..... 75.3 (X) Portuguese... ............................... 54 0.3 Population 65 years and over.......... 1,226 100.0 Russian., . ........ __ .... ................. 69 0.3 With a disability ............ .................. 547 44.6 Scotch - Irish................. _......__........ 154 0.7 Scottish ....... _ ...... _ .................... 240 1.1 RESIDENCE IN 1995 Slovak. . ................... . . ... . ........... 10 - Population 5 years and over........... 19,291 100.0 Subsaharan African. . . . . ..................... 62 0.3 Same house in 1995. ... ..................... 7,814 40.5 Swedish..... _ .... ............ ......_....... 137 0.7 Different house in the U.S. in 1995 ............. 8,455 43.8 Swiss........ . ................. - ... ......... 50 0.2 Same county ............ .............. _ .. 5,459 28.3 Ukrainian ........... . ... ... .......... 8 - Different county ............................ 2,996 15.5 United States or American..................... 1,552 7.4 Same state.._.._... _.._... _ 1,265 6.6 Welsh... ..__ ............ ....... ......... 81 0.4 Different state... ........... ............ 1,731 9.0 West Indian (excluding Hispanic groups) ........ 1,402 6.7 Elsewhere in 1995 ... ......................... 3,022 15.7 Other ancestries ............................. 8,205 39.0 - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. 'The data represent a combination of two ancestries shown separately in Summary File 3. Czech includes Czechoslovakian. French includes Alsa- tian- French Canadian includes Acadian /Cajun. Irish includes Celtic. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. U5 -C,nv 8ureao Table DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000 Seographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida 'Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent EMPLOYMENT STATUS INCOME IN 1999 Population 16 years and over............ 15,349 100.0 Households ............................. 6,462 100.0 In labor force . ............................... 10,590 69.0 Less than $10, 000............................ 308 4.8 Civilian labor force............... .... .... ... 10,579 68.9 $10,000 to $14 ,999........................... 268 4.1 Employed ............................ ... 10,288 67.0 $15,000 to $24 ,999........................... 852 13.2 Unemployed ............................. 291 1.9 $25,000 to $34 ,999........................... 1,160 18.0 Percent of civilian labor force ............ 2.8 (X) $35,000 to $49 ,999 ........................... 1,353 20.9 Armed Forces .............................. 11 0.1 $50,000 to $74 ,999........................... 1,458 22.6 Not in labor force ............................. 4,759 31.0 $75,000 to $99 ,999........................... 617 9.5 Females 16 years and over .............. 7,247 100.0 $100,000 to $ 149 ,999......................... $150,00010 $ 199 328 82 5.1 1.3 In labor tome . ............................... 4,429 61.1 ,999......................... $200.000 or more ............................ 36 0.6 Civilian labor force .......................... 4,429 61.1 Median household income (dollars)............. 42,295 (X) Employed ............................... 4,273 59.0 Own children under 6 years .............. 2,058 100.0 With earnings. ............................... Mean earnings (dollars) .................... 5,856 48,531 90.6 (X) All parents in family in labor force .............. 1,284 62.4 With Social Security income ................... 969 15.0 COMMUTING TO WORK Mean Social Security income (dollars)' ....... 11,871 (X) Workers 16 years and over .............. 10,059 100.0 With Supplemental Security Income ............ 219 3.4 Car, truck, or van - - drove alone............... 7,492 74.5 Mean Supplemental Security Income Car, truck, or van - - carpooled ................. 1,857 18.5 (dollars)' .. ............................... 6,968 (X) Public transportation (including taxicab) . - ....... 34 0.3 With public assistance income ................. 138 2.1 Walked .................... ..... .. ........... 164 1.6 Mean public assistance income (dollars)' ..... 1,911 (X) Other means. . ............. 352 3.5 With retirement income ....................... 745 11.5 Worked at home ............................. 160 1.6 Mean retirement income (dollars)'............ 18,178 (X) Mean travel time to work (minutes)' ............ 23.4 (X) Families . ............................... 4,968 100.0 Employed civilian population Less than $10, 000..... ............ ........... 292 5.9 16 years and over ..................... 10,288 100.0 $10,000 to $14 ,999........................... 262 5.3 OCCUPATION $15,00010 $24,999. . .............. ....... 607 12.2 Management, professional, and related $25,000 to $34,999 ................. . ......... 826 16.6 occupations ............ . .. ................ 1,669 16.2 $35,000 to $49 ,999........................... 1,084 21.8 Service occupations .......................... 2,569 25.0 $50,000 to $74 ,999 ............... ......_..... 1,122 22.6 Sales and office occupations .................. 2,436 23.7 $75,000 to $99 ,999........................... 445 9.0 Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations....... 50 0.5 $100,000 to $149,999. . .............. _ .... 255 5.1 Construction, extraction, and maintenance $150,000 to $ 199 ,999 ......................... 44 0.9 occupations . ............................... 2,277 22.1 $200,000 or more ............................ 31 0.6 Production, transportation, and material moving Median family income (dollars) ................. 41,774 (X) occupations . ............................... 1,287 12.5 Per capita income (dollars) ............ . .. . ... 15,923 (X) INDUSTRY Median earnings (dollars): 28,630 (X)\ Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, Male full -time, year -round workers .............. and mining .. ............................... 88 0.9 Female full -time, year -round workers ........... 22,911 (X)/ Const ruction ........................... ...... 1,915 18.6 Number Percent Manufacturing . ............................... 591 5.7 below below Wholesale trade .............................. 291 2.8 poverty poverty Retail trade.. . ....... ......... .. .......... 1,592 15.5 Subject level level Transportation and warehousing, and utilities .... 503 4.9 Information ............................... .. 108 1.0 Finance, insurance, real estate, and rental and POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 leasing ... ............................... ... 556 5.4 Families . ............................... 566 11.4 Professional, scientific, management, adminis- With related children under 18 years............ 456 14.6 trative, and waste management services....... 1,073 10.4 With related children under 5 years ........... 145 10.3 Educational, health and social services ......... 1,129 11.0 Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation Families with female householder, no and food services ........................... 1,483 14.4 husband present ....................... 220 24.7 Other services (except public administration) .... 643 63 With related children under 18 years ............ 200 30.3 Public administration.. . ............. _ ...... 316 3.1 With related children under 5 years ........... 62 26.5 CLASS OF WORKER Individuals .............................. 2,939 14.1 Private wage and salary workers ............... 8,712 84.7 18 years and over ............................ 1,768 12.1 Government workers ....... ............. 883 8.6 65 years and over.......................... 121 9.9 Self- employed workers in own not incorporated Related children under 18 years ............... 1,093 18.0 business . ............................... ... 674 6.6 Related children 5 to 17 years............... 874 19.9 Unpaid family workers ........................ 19 0.2 Unrelated individuals 15 years and over......... 766 21.4 - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. 'If the denominator of a mean value or per capita value is less than 30, then that value is calculated using a rounded aggregate in the numerator. See text. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. 3 U. S. Census Bureau 5/,5H1 Table DP -4. Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida ,Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text) Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total housing units .................... 7,024 100.0 OCCUPANTS PER ROOM UNITS IN STRUCTURE Occupied housing units ..... I ......... 6,540 100.0 1 -unh, detached .............................. 3,989 56.8 1.00 or less................ .................. 5,389 82.4 1 -unit, attached .............................. 352 5.0 1.01 to 1.50 .. ............................... 595 9.1 2 units ....... ............................... 507 7.2 1.51 or more.. ............................... 556 8.5 3 or 4 units ... ............................... 857 12.2 5 to 9 units ... ............................... 709 10.1 Specified owner-occupied units........ 3,261 100.0 10 to 19 units . ............................... 395 5.6 VALUE 20 or more units ............................. 188 2.7 Less than $50, 000 ..... _. ____ .............. 28 0.9 Mobile home .. ............................... 27 0.4 $50,000 to $99 ,999........................... 1,840 56.4 Boat, RV, van, etc .......................... - $100,000 to $ 149 ,999......................... 1,310 40.2 $150,000 to $ 199 ,999 ......................... 68 2.1 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT $200,000 to $ 299 ,999 ......................... - - 1999 to March 2000 .......................... 178 2.5 $300,000 to $499 ,999......................... 15 0.5 1995 to 1998 . ............................... 472 6.7 $500,000 to $ 999 ,999......................... - - 1990 to 1994 .................... ............ 1,291 18.4 $1,000,000 or more........................... - 1980 to 1989 . ............................... 3,220 45.8 Median ( dollars ).............................. 97,000 (X) 1970 to 1979 ..... ..................... ...... 1,460 20.8 1960 to 1969 . ............................... 370 5.3 MORTGAGE STATUS AND SELECTED 1940 to 1959 . ............................... 16 0.2 MONTHLY OWNER COSTS 1939 or earlier ............................. 0.2 With a mortgage ............................. 2,821 86.5 Less than $300 ................. ......... 9 0.3 ROOMS $300 to $499 ............................ 23 0.7 1 room ............. ....................... .. 97 1.4 $500 to $699 ..... 259 7.9 2 rooms ...... ............................... 608 8.7 $700 to $999 ............ _. . _......... -. 1,505 46.2 3 rooms......... _..__...._.. _.... ...... 886 12.6 $1,000 to $1,499......____ .......... . 913 28.0 4 moms.. . .............. ...... ._ . ..... 1,556 22.2 $1,500 to $1,999__.. ... .................. 95 2.9 5 rooms ...... ............................... 1,578 22.5 $2,000 or more .............. __ ........ 17 0.5 6 rooms ...... ............................... 1,464 20.8 Median (dollars).._................ _ _ ... 909 (X) 7 rooms ...... ............................... 613 8.7 Not mortgaged ............................... 440 13.5 8 rooms ...... ............................... 160 2.3 Median ( dollars ).......................... 278 (X) 9 or more rooms ........ . .................... 62 0.9 Median (rooms) ....... . ...................... 4.7 (X) SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD Occupied housing units ............... 6,540 1 00.0 INCOME IN 1999 YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Less than 15.0 percent.. ............... 922 28.3 1999 to March 2000 .......................... 1,914 29.3 15.0 to 19.9 percent ................... _ ..... 536 16.4 1995 to 1998 . ............................... 2,368 36.2 20.0 to 24.9 percent .......................... 538 16.5 1990 to 1994 ..... ............. 1,147 17.5 25.0 to 29.9 percent.......... ._.. .. .. _..._ 333 10.2 1980 to 1989. .... .._...... ... _._. _ ...... 847 13.0 30.0 to 34.9 percent.. . ... .. ......_ ......... . 299 9.2 1970 to 1979 . ............................... 245 3.7 35.0 percent or more ......................... 590 18.1 1969 or earlier ............................... 19 0.3 Not computed.... ........................... 43 1.3 VEHICLES AVAILABLE Specified renter - occupied units ........ 2,767 100.0 None ........ ............................... 275 4.2 GROSS RENT 1 ............ ............................... 2,441 37.3 Less than $200 .......... .................... 10 0.4 2 ............ ............................... 2,860 43.7 $200 to $299 .... ..._....._............... - - 3 or more .... ............................... 964 14.7 $300 to $499 . ............................... 105 3.8 $500 to $749 ......... ....................... 1,301 47.0 HOUSE HEATING FUEL $750 to $999 ......... . ...................... 1,154 41.7 Utility gas .............................. .... 24 0.4 $1,000 to $1,499...--- .................... ... 154 5.6 Bottled, tank, or LP gas ..... _ ................ 7 0.1 $1,500 or more .............. _ . - ............. - - Electricit y ..... ...................... ........ 6,444 98.5 No cash rent........................ .. ....... 43 1.6 Fuel oil, kerosene, etc ............ . ........ . - - Median (dollars)... _ ................. _ ....... 743 (X) Coal or coke .. ............................... - - Wood ........ ............................... - - GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF Solar energy .. ............................... - - HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999 Other fuel ......... ......... ....... .._ ...._. 4 0.1 Less than 15.0 percent................... -... 581 21.0 No fuel used ............... ................. 61 0.9 15.0 to 19.9 percent .......................... 499 18.0 20.0 to 24.9 percent_. _.. .................. 287 10.4 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS 25 -0 to 29.9 percent ....... . .................. 274 9.9 Lacking complete plumbing facilities ............ - - 30.0 to 34.9 percent .......................... 205 7.4 Lacking complete kitchen facilities.. . ...... .... 17 0.3 35.0 percent or more ......................... 835 30.2 No telephone service .................... ..... 171 2.6 Not computed. ............................... 86 3.1 - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. L4 . Census Bureau 1116 - Fact Sheet - American FactF nder http: / /factfinder. census .gov /servlet/SAFFFacts ?_event= Search &geo_ .. 1 r 2 7/25/06 11:20 PM Zip Code Tabulation Area 34116 View a Fad Sheet for a race, ethnic, or ancestry group Census 2000 Demographic Profile Highlights: General Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. Total population 25,170 map brief Male 13,149 52.2 49.1% map brief Female 12,021 47.8 50.9% map brief W.djaD -aW (years) 30.8 (X) 35.3 map brief Under 5 years 2,048 8.1 6.8% map 18 years and over 17,863 71.0 74.3% 65 years and over 1,835 7.3 12.4% map brief One iaGt3 24,211 96.2 97.6% White 20,063 79.7 75.1% map brief Black or African American 2,239 8.9 12.3% map brief American Indian and Alaska Native 88 0.3 0.9% map brief Asian 207 0.8 3.6% map brief Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 27 0.1 0.1% map brief Some other race 1,587 6.3 5.5% map Two or more races 959 3.8 2.4% map brief Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 8,164 32.4 12.5% map brief Household population 25,119 99.8 972% map brief Group quarters population 51 0.2 2.8% map Average bQUSabold size 3.09 (X) 2.59 map brief Average family size 3.36 (X) 3.14 map Total housing units 8,818 map Occupied housing units 8,137 92.3 91.0% brief Owner - occupied housing units 4,972 61.1 66.2% map Renter - occupied housing units 3,165 38.9 33.8% map brief Vacant housing units 681 7.7 9.0% map Social Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. Population 25 years and over 15,294 High school graduate or higher 10,998 71.9 80.4% map brief Bachelor's degree or higher 2,069 13.5 24.4% map ,,CbWiap, -vELe am(civilian population 18 years and 1,780 10.0 12.7% map brief over) Disability status (population 5 years and over) 5,898 25.5 19.3% map brief Foreign born 7,418 29.5 11.1% map brief Male, Now married, except separated (population 15 5,170 51.9 56.7% brief years and over) Female, Now married, except separated (population 4,888 54.0 52.1% brief 15 years and over) Speak a language other than English at home 8,840 38.2 17.9% map brief (population 5 years and over) Economic Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. In labor force (population 16 years and over) 12,922 69.2 63.9% brief Mean travel time to work in minutes (workers 16 23.2 (X) 25.5 map brief years and older) Median household incotna in 1999 (dollars) 43,805 (X) 41,994 map Median family income in 1999 (dollars) 43,240 (X) 50,046 map Per capita income in 1999 (dollars) 17,756 (X) 21,587 map Families below poverty level 595 9.7 9.2% map brief 1 r 2 7/25/06 11:20 PM 34116 - Fact Sheet - American FactFinder 2of2 Individuals below poverty level http: / /factfi nder. census. gov /servlet/SAFFFacts ?_event= Search &geo_ 3,118 12.5 12.4% map Housing Characteristics -show more >> Number Percent Single - family owner - occupied homes 4,189 Median value (dollars) 104,000 (X) Median of selected monthly owner costs (X) (X) With a ptpltgagg (dollars) 944 (X) Not mortgaged (dollars) 289 (X) (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3) r U.S. brief 119,600 map brief brief 1,088 map 295 7/25/06 11:20 PM Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page IV -1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1. The findings of this market- conditions study demonstrate clearly that it is in the interest of those living within the Primary Trade Area, as defined in Section I, that a convenience center be developed on available acreage within and adjacent to the present site of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development. 2. The Colonnades' site located on Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Bar- bara Boulevard can provide easily expanded convenience shopping opportu- nities for the traveling public. 3. The study further contends that in instances where conventional C -3 and C -4 zoning is permitted within already developed shopping centers within or adjacent to the Primary Trade Area (PTA), it may be appropriate to permit a limited array of C -4 uses outside existing centers that provide op- portunities for certain desired convenience services serving neighboring resi- dential communities and travelers. 4. Expansion of commercialdevelopment to provide needed goods and services to residents of the PTA will likely be driven by the spacing require- ments of supermarket and drug store chains; the impact of other surround- ing commercial and residential development; and the future but unan- nounced plans of land owners to develop parcels now earmarked, but cur- rently undeveloped, for commercial uses. i 1:1KIlulu 11.107111 C11 kW 1. A transitional -area, commercial -use project to accommodate uses pro- vided for in the C -3 and C -4 zoning districts in the Land Development Code (LDC) should be given first consideration when planning for the subject site. 2. The future plans of retail establishments within reasonable proximity of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara should be evaluated to determine if a portion of the site could be developed in a manner to accommodate the re- location plans of convenience and drug store outlets that would be well served by a highly- visible, free - standing facility at a high- traffic location like the subject site. 3. The subject site also recommends itself as an appropriate site for an array of Conditional Uses. 4. A plan should be developed that will, at a minimum, anticipate the response(s) of those living in adjacent neighborhoods to proposed commer- cial development on the subject site, and address neighborhood concerns likely to be expressed at public hearings held to consider a future zoning ap- plication. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -1 II. EXISTING COMMERCIAL LAND USES Market conditions analyzed in Section I demonstrated clearly that ac- celerated growth in the permanent population of Golden Gate City and the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) demonstrates potential market support from an emerging population within a defined Primary Trade Area that can document claims as to the viability of proposed com- mercial uses on the subject Colonnades At Santa Barbara. Section II will detail the dimensions of present commercial develop- ment in Golden Gate City and the Golden Gate PCD. The predictable desires of the increased population in the Primary Trade Area (PTA) for basic goods and services forecast a steady, incremental development of currently underutilized commercial parcels along the Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886) and Santa Barbara Boulevard corridors con- sistent with the recent patterns in area growth of new residential units. Additionally, office space; repair and wholesale facilities; hotels and motels; entertainment centers; and institutional uses such as churches, nursing homes, and schools will likely be accommodated as well on available land developed, or being developed, for these purposes. tential in Collier County (Fraser & Mohlke Associates, February 1997) estab- lished that new commercial structures totaling 2,672,034 square feet were completed from 1986 to 1995, constituting a 254.08 percent increase from a total of 1,051,637 square feet developed in 1986 to 3,723,671 square feet of commercial structures developed by 1995 (Reference "Table One: Land Use Inventory for Commercially Zoned Areas of Collier County"). Prospects are that a similar analysis for the 10 -year period from 1995 to the present would demonstrate an even greater increase in commercial square footage. Commercial Land -Use Inventory The 2005 Collier County Commercial Land Use Study, prepared by the Comprehensive Planning Section as Appendix A -1 to the Future Land Use Element Support Document, analyzed commercial zoning including the standard categories of C -1, C -2, C -3, C -4, C -5, and PUD zoning as defined in the County's Land Development Code. A list of applicable 2 -digit codes from the Collier County Property Ap- praiser's_Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) Codes is provided to describe the listed land uses; all other relevant data is reported by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), and by commercial land -use categories now in effect in Collier County. Selected data derived from the most recent available land -use data collected in calendar year 2005 has been incorporated in an analysis reported later in Section II. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -2 Property- appraisal -based analysis presents certain difficulties in match- ing commercially zoned acreage with acreage classified according to Property Appraiser land -use codes. Consequently, this analysis will limit the use of property- appraisal data to site - specific determinations of acreage and the square -foot dimensions of existing structures only. Commercial acreage and buildings reported by the square- footage of a structure's "footprint" com- prise much of the basis for the analysis that follows. Utilization of Community Shopping Centers for Non - Traditional Uses Countywide, data from the 2005 Commercial Land Use Study suggests that some of the area's community shopping centers are performing a role beyond their traditional function as a site for retail shopping anchored tradi- tionally by a supermarket and a drug store. Determining the motivation of older shopping center tenants to lease space, and why their customers sup- port an older center's non - retail business enterprises is well beyond the scope of this analysis. However, an ongoing analysis exploring the evolving community role of older neighborhood and community shopping center sites under 25.00 acres may well be timely in order to evaluate the importance of these centers in providing non - retail services to nearby neighborhood residents. Evolving utilization of neighborhood and community shopping cen- ters for non - traditional purposes is an essentially unaddressed element of land -use planning in Collier County. In recent years, the use of existing centers by non - retail vendors, many of whom might logically locate their activities in traditional office buildings or office parks, is becoming com- monplace. Although evidence as to why non - traditional tenants lease space in community shopping centers, and why customers support these tenants, is largely anecdotal, the reasons listed below indicate reasons why non- traditional users, like those requiring office or storage space only, are re- placing traditional retail tenants. Reasons given to Fraser & Mohlke Associates by non - traditional tenants for locating their business activities in older community shopping centers include the following: • Desirable location, • Availability of vacant storefronts at affordable lease rates, • Security, • Zoning considerations unique to certain businesses or professions, • Cost of alternative real estate near a vendors preferred location, • Costs related to the construction of free - standing office structures, • Parking requirements specific to certain businesses and professions, Colonnades At Sanata Barbara Dwelling Units and Population By Traffic Analysis Zone Primary Trade Area (PTA) 2005 and 2030 (TAZ) Table 2.01 2005 TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 2nd Auto Multi - Family Multi - Family 2nd Auto Dwelling Units Population Percentage Dwelling Units Population Percentage (Persons) (Persons) 166 73 219 86 0 0 0 167 155 377 86 0 0 0 192 49 157 72 0 0 0 193 110 319 72 0 0 0 194 249 731 72 6 20 99 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 11 36 62 9 26 31 199 537 1980 70 122 265 33 200 0 0 0 472 1,336 60 201 224 714 62 175 515 31 202 361 1317 62 199 539 38 210 230 763 73 58 145 17 211 327 1008 73 86 259 17 254 17 38 50 152 255 37 256 49 91 50 451 627 37 3.24 Persons Per Household (PPH) 2.30 Persons Per Household (PPH) Table 2.02 2030 TAZ Single - Family Single - Family 2nd Auto Multi - Family Multi- Family 2nd Auto Dwelling Units Population Percentage Dwelling Units Population Percentage (Persons) (Persons) 166 92 275 86 0 0 0 167 162 393 86 0 0 0 192 61 194 72 0 0 0 193 127 369 72 0 0 0 194 270 792 72 6 20 99 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 11 36 62 9 26 31 199 539 1986 70 132 287 33 200 0 0 0 1,384 3,917 60 201 226 720 62 175 515 31 202 362 1319 62 210 570 38 210 231 766 73 62 197 17 211 331 1019 73 86 259 17 254 172 385 50 504 846 37 256 49 91 50 451 627 37 3.17 Persons Per Household (PPH) 2.41 Persons Per Household (PPH) - Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -3 • "Walk -in" traffic supplied by adjacent tenants, • Minimum need for store -front visibility to attract customers, and • Availability of on- premises management services and maintenance. Anticipating New Commercial Uses in Collier County Additionally, Golden Gate area growth may soon result in increased pressures for commercial development along the Golden Gate Parkway (CR- 886) and the Santa Barbara Boulevard corridors to accommodate the goods - and- services needs of a growing population within the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) analyzed in this market - conditions study. Extension of commercial development along these corridors will likely be driven by considerations such as the spacing requirements of re- tail /wholesale -chain outlets, the emerging needs of surrounding commercial and residential development, and the as yet unannounced plans of develop- ers of an approved and /or a proposed Planned Use Development (PUD) lo- cated in the immediate area that may yet lead to proposals to zone and de- velop new commercial facilities that are not currently under review by county planners at the time of this writing. Characteristics of Commercial Land -Use in the Primary Trade Area To document the need for new commercial facilities Primary Trade Area (PTA) as proposed in Section I, it is necessary to examine the present pattern of commercial development along its principal arterial and collector roads. Specific land use designations are listed later in Section II. These des- ignations are taken from the Collier County Commercial Land Use Inven- tory (2005). Land use designations are derived from appraisal records and Geo- graphic Information Service (GIS) data provided by the County's Property Appraiser Office, the Comprehensive Planning Section's PUD Inventory, and Zoning Maps. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) planning docu- ments provide additional information on each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). Commercial land uses located in the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara will be benefited by an estimated increase of PTA population that is predicted to increase by 3,518 persons be- tween 2005 and 2030 according to estimates provided by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the development of Collier County's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) described in detail in Section I of this market - conditions study (See pages I -7 -I -9). Tables 2.01 and 2.02 exhibited on the facing page document this growth by each TAZ located in the Primary Trade Area (PTA). U N C E E O U O c 'c A a m O C C N 7 R .R E E 0 U of O O N aR0 R c H Q c C O 0 V M O N d L F h 0 }NO! V O 0 0 Of 7 CL a V v1 O� O 1� DO N O b v1 � t� N aD v1 V7 M n N P O� M Cag N LO V1 ^ N LO W N ^ R O S °S °S °o °S °oNS °S° C C o o o a o 0 n N S ° S° S° n N C v) G G C N C C 00 10 w IZ M N 1 S° V M O° '- M P M�o O '09 N � OD N m M OO � s a$a�o ° N P b N m a �G .�•. �° n N n 00 N O r N O a0 C O C aO N N M IT i m g° o rn g° g° fV � C W C C C M N O MID 1 P P M M v1 N N O O n n N N PT PO v1n'n �O 'q Vm M, N V pp M N ? S v 1 N �O M, �Owv)r Oa0 nN O� OO° Y C� N M M W K N M N f� O "' C O O NO n T W M M O M M 6-1 W V n aD 1i � n OC �!1 N M � 06 N � N ri ^ �... N N O vj a N N N N N N �O O0 N_ 10 M rD M 00 u O �O T N R •` lJ li P M m `O - v ° a0 i vl Y' r V r as �UNUMU V of V V E V E y ViV aVaU U a Od a a a ¢ o_ N d A F r � O O O O O N O O N O O O N O n ° M M � � r ° M co O` O C ` N 00 P of 0 0 0 0 00 M N V Q NO O O PN 10 e�i v vi M 10 of O N O. O O M M N N a; O I aO M a0 W �O N ° O m O N 0 b a0 N N N N N v1 Oct P M n > avvvt,0 R •` lJ i E ° E a V Q O V ai C N C al d C d a V G c a N V C_ d E > O a u C C R E V N` O E cc E ° O � O C E d R a 0 m C N u —y R V M a E R 0 0 c 7 C O 0 N O Y q C O 0 c 0 -0 R h O y R O -n 0 u cC O. Ccn N A v � R E. a V V E a V � N Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -4 Land uses for the Colonnades At Santa Barbara's Primary Trade Area (PTA), derived from Collier County's 2005 Commercial Land Use Inventory, are exhibited on the following four (4) pages. Each exhibit is accompanied by a facing -page listing of land -use explanations provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser; listed land uses will assist the reader in identify- ing actual commercial activity conducted on the listed parcels or subdivi- sions. As noted above, the list of applicable 2 -digit codes from the Collier County Property Appraiser's_Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) Codes is provided to describe the listed land uses; all other relevant data is reported by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), and by commercial land -use categories now in effect in Collier County. Section 5 of this study includes a definitive listing of commercial land uses for the entirety of the Golden Gate Planning Community District. Commercial zoning district acreage analyzed by planning com- munity population is shown in Table 2.03 exhibited on the facing page. The analysis proves conclusively that the population of the Golden Gate Planning Community District (PCD) is underserved by commercial en- terprises providing needed goods and services to PCD residents. The findings reported in Table 2.03 are persuasive in establishing that a Golden Gate PCD resident, when measured by an acres- standard lacks shopping opportunities readily available, for example, to a resident of the North Naples PCD. Assessment of New Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Commercial Land Uses A careful reading of the commercial zoning listings for land -uses for the Primary Trade Area (PTA) is demonstrated on the four (4) pages of ex- hibits that follow. These exhibits will demonstrate clearly that parcels avail- able for commercial uses in the general area likely to be affected by prospec- tive new commercial uses under recently adopted provisions of the GGAMP, namely parcels within TAZ 199, are largely C -2 uses located on parcels of diminumous dimensions. These parcels are largely vacant, particularly those with dimensions of 0.14 acres or less. Parcels in TAZ 200 now devoted to rental properties, not owner - occupied residences, that will eventually become available for commercial use are unlikely to accommodate commercial structures larger than 2,200 to 2,400 square feet in size. Currently, there are no commercially zoned prop- erties listed in TAZ 200. Evaluating the future uses of these commercially - unzoned properties appears problematic and is well beyond the scope of this study. Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to and two-digit numbers refer to CQ& 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 173 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional. Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment and Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van iu Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools lu Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section II. � a o oos o opssSs�pm pppp so "moos°8' pose { s$ S {opmBpBaos6 �spss8po8 O 8 � lC O m rn rn m m m rn m rn a m m a+ rn m m rn rn w m m m rn w m m m rn m a m m w m m w w O L a r a r a r a e r r r r e e r e a e a e r e e r r r r r e e r r a r e r r H W N � N c E �W N 7 — L N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W O m 0 0 Oa Cl C) (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (7 C7 C7 C7 U C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 IL U¢ a U' C7 h a 0 0 0 0 a 0 C9 0 0 0 0 0 C9 0 U' C7 U' 0 0 LD 0 0 0 0 C7 0 a (7 0 a (D (D 0 0 (7 u u A a mm C W N m L W C C O T Appendix A -1 COLLIER IER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida and Iwo -digit numbers refer to Collier Countiv Florida Department of Revenue IDOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -in Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment and Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section IL N Y) O N O$ S m Q S O O O m O O r O S O O O O O S O O O O O -e L m h aD m CO S In I� Q uD A S O N N ( °p 92 m m S O O M N O M N :O tm+l M M M mm N N N N M M { M{pp m Mm Np { Np N N N M M M M M M M t7 C> M f7 t'1 M yy 0 4' th M M M M M M M S S M M M S d M S S M M S em+i S m lm'1 M M M M M tm�I LL C m� N N N N N e N m t7 d O e m V M d � M m 0 f0 M M f7 fV 1t O G G Ci O G O O Ci C C O C O O C OC � C � O N O � C N � G Y �- O O G L �Q u w = cc N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M q q q 0 g q q e 0 0 0 g 4 q ,°5 bti ticicitititipptic titidu ciciti00 o0o avoociaaa�� U S S O ? N f m m d; Cr LL. d1 9 + 7 � a C7 O O � o m Q � a Z-0 ° 16 3: U y m a w m m Y L m E °° � ^' � m °o °o tW' C = N . M c = = a ' ` ` qj m m m .6,,6 N LL E N N N t ai ) 0 Y Y Y Y mmm'm'mMmmmmmMmm m 8'- Am o.mm mm'mC�mmmm $8 m e (o C6 m 16 N vi vi vi 1616 m m 16 vi vi 3 N ui fe m ro m ro m ro m �o m m m r > > 7 d E 6 d m m d m m w m n n ry m m 0 m Yo E m w m m m m w m a a U' g m m 0 m m (7 C7 C7 (7 o o C7 3 (7 a '' 0 C7 C7 0 0 0 U' 0 o 0 0 8 o 08 8 C7 0 32 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0 c 0 o a m m m i c c y m c 0 3 $ m a 9 0 00 0 0 o o 0= 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 (7 (7 (7 C� U' 03,2 ' C7 U' C� C� C� (7 C7 C7 CD 0 C9 C7 C7 U' C� (7 0 U' CD U' 0 U' 0 CD U' m rn rn rn rn m m rn rn rn rn rn m rn m rn rn m M m m rn w w w w w w w w w w 8a W rnrnrn rnrnmmrnrnrnw rnwrn MOf Of M rnmrn MMOOMMOMOM N m 0 m m m m m m m m m m m U) Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d cm C m m m m m m m m m m m W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w W w w W W W w W W W w w W w w W W w w w W w W W W w w W W w w W -.. Q-C e e d d e d d d e d d d e e d e ri d e e d e e e d e e e e d e e d H 07 C C 7 c E $ E� � � o E N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M g m M q q q 6 IL U Q a 0 a 0 U' 0 0 0 U' 0 0 0 0 0 m o U' U' C7 C7 m C7 C7 C7 W C7 C7 C9 C7 C7 C7 U' U' C7 C7 m C7 N m C N r A C Q U m F- in m d Q v N iL- Z^ W E a 0 c m c d D c m J m N E E O U O N N cc m m r C t0 Q m N 'O R C C O T Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to and lino -digit numbers refer to Collie 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -in Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment and Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television * "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section II. 2 Z O o' LL C qw Q G J Q � C N � V LL N WG� J b S b O O S� O M th p ♦O H N P f N < a V b N A W M v r M W N P IQ Cl! P b P N O O O O O O O O O O O M U U U U U U U ti U U U A N N ''' N N N E 7 � � � N r N r � c EM =Z b (o E r W mm CL Q eA- P b N lL b W g w �opssSoosoQo N N N N N N N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m 7 7 7» D j i O) d 0) 6 a- s- 0f 01 01 0 N% N W 0 N N W N W N as $$ a z o 20 a (0J U0 (7 (7 aU a 0 U'0 C9 (07 o� -- - - - - - - - - N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 =0 N N N N N N N N N N N fD f0 N (O tD (O (O b b t0 (O N N N N N N N N N N N IM c 7 c E �2 �2 �2 �2 8 a CD oo0aH m 8 mg }pQ{ p S O p l0 N A A A l0 A A A M M W N M b P N 01 p N' b l0 M M M M ty M M M Y N O N N b b O Y1 M P N N O N N O O O O O O O O N O P te^ aC r t7 N b N N M m c 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a J J J J J J J w a a a a a a a a o U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 {J m b m S m A A 1 00� i 11100 i D WEJ lWiO 1 c'; C4 6 M i Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Propea Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue Fes] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items will assist the reader in identifying land uses not subject to analysis in Section II. m a p E — 3 Z 0 O N o a LL J Q R C p N C 7 UN Q LL t WC « J q spop�opopso 8 0 0' 0 g Og N Oi M M M M M M M M N N n n n by r P � O C N CC M N � C 20 El o > Z 7 a O ~ m O N L 3 N . x x J 7 J J m m M C m J J J w w w W N Yi d _N N m N c�c�3c�c�c�c� N N m 0 a 2 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 (7 0 U' U' U' (D U' w 0) W Nf0 c0 to G Q W OI 0) Of co (O W (D N F � (O (O (D fD fD (D t0 N N N N N N N O 0 Y d O O O F P Im C C A O E' IL 0 Q (gip m ^m G o C N J X y W C J o c CN J o W C X C N y r y c.M CL T Q f0 N .O. C M N U O1 NC U L F- U « . ik Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -9 Supportable Commercial Uses and Land Use Recommendations Substantial new residential construction, supported by the area's ex- panding roadway network, will likely accelerate demand for accessible, well - located commercial centers providing for the personal - service needs of future residents. Growing consumer pressures generated by new residents will likely foster additional demand for new commercial space, perhaps even exceeding the demand generated by residents being absorbed within the developing neighborhoods in the proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA). The objective of this analysis is to assess the commercial development potential of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara and provide some degree of mar- ket justification. Consistent with this objective, it appears appropriate to de- velop a well - located multi- purpose commercial facility or facilities on the subject Colonnades site near the area's developing neighborhoods. In evaluating the commercial uses presently available to serve the fu- ture needs of area neighborhoods, this analysis has sought to address the following criteria to be employed during any plan- amendment or rezoning process to quantify the actual mix and variety of land uses surrounding the subject site's PTA in order that any proposed uses may be evaluated accord- ing to the following considerations: Adequacy of available infrastructure capacity, particularly roads; 2. Existing patterns of land use in general proximity to the subject site; 3. The amount, type and location of existing zoned and developed commercial uses in general proximity to the subject site; and 4. Other criteria identified in the Land Development Code (LDC). The Colonnades At Santa Barbara site is well situated for use as a mixed -use facility that would allow land uses compatible with adjacent resi- dential areas. Located in proximity to a large platted urban community, it can serve as a transitional facility providing needed convenience services. Listed below are recommended land uses identified with a category number obtained from the Standard Industrial Classification Manuel (1987). Land Use Recommendations Collier County's General Commercial Zoning District lists the fol- lowing Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) groups that can be considered both consistent with the purpose and intent of applicable zoning standards and appropriate uses for development on the Colonnades At Santa Barbara - site: • Building construction (SIC groups 1521- 1542); -- Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page II -10 • Business services (SIC groups 7311,7312,7334,7338,7342 - 7389); • Educational services (SIC groups 82 -8249, 8221, 8331); • Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (SIC groups 8711 - 8748); • Depository institutions (SIC group 6021, 6022, 6091); • Eating and drinking places (SIC groups 5812 and 5813); • Health services (SIC groups 8011, 8021, 8082, • Insurance carriers (SIC groups 6311, 6321, 6324, 6321, 6331); • Membership organizations (SIC groups 8611, 8631, 8641, 8699); • Miscellaneous retail (SIC groups 5912, 5921, 5942, 5992, 5993, 5994, 5999); • Personal services (SIC groups7231, 7241, 7291, 7299); • Professional offices (SIC groups 6311 -6399, 6411, 6531, 6540, 6552, 6553, 6712 -6799, 8111); • Real estate (SIC groups 6531, 6541, 6552); • Social services (SIC group 8311); and • Any other commercial use or professional service that is compatible in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as may be determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Note: The Colonnades At Santa Barbara is ideally located to accom- modate the relocation plans of convenience and drug store outlets that would be well served by a highly visible, freestanding facility at a high- traffic location like the subject site. Section III will analyze retail market demand in the area surround- ing a proposed Primary Trade Area (PTA). Section IV will provide Study recommendations. Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. Section 2 - Exhibit 1 Inventory of Existing Commercial Land Uses: Golden Gate Planning Community District - Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Properly Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue rDOR1 Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items -- L Z Z W G J 0 (5 m a R C LL m 0 m 0 a bbbL7 ' 7 Q r N t0 f7 Cl Cl (J l�J C1 f7 l7 l7 l7 C'1 L�J 1 f�l l�l l L�1 0 0 LL w w� tV pp O N b m pp m Crl N. cfVV pp N N .e- N O M m m� muj J V v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U b0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U vi w N N N v > > > > J > > >93> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7 LL y i RE ' O O O O O O O N ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O n O O 7 a e § s E m s 2 Z m y o o S I O' La N m N co m 5 O L O O m Y< Yl N YI N m Wf b N N ,6 Vf Yf m N b N N N w m m m m w w f0 06,6 Qy6 d w w {O f0 d (6 as C C C C .y C C C m C C C C C C C C C C C C C D C C C C C C C C C C C C C== C J J J J m m J J J J J J 7 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 7 J J J J J J J J J J J mm J 0 W mm ai 01 m0 m 0i m 0i 4i mom m�0101m aimmm aimmai aid ai ai m o mmai N 0 01 W ttl m W W 0 W W rN 0 41 0 W 4) m rN et ( at 01 W al t0 m t0 m Of m 00 m0� 0a 0 a) �0a (DO 000000000 �mm m ��mm =mdm$�mm= _ 1m1mmmm $ °sue $a$u$ °a $$$$$ $$$ °a$ woo 00 00 c3 �c 0 CDCD(90C7t7OO 0000000000(D 0 0 000 rnln112 ma N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N cm W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q. C w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m F � C C C C � n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m Q g 4106 a 0 a o U' C1 U' 0c7 G C7a U' 0a(D a a a U' 0 U' as C1 a 0 a C) (700 o a CJ av�a mv00wa000000 � 0)a 0000000000000000000000000000000 m a R C LL m 0 m 0 a Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County PropeU Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOB] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 173 Office and Professional Services 17 .Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items oW _o d NRN�� . O O O G C G O 0 0 0 0 0 a � Cp N N N N N N N N N N N N N C U U U U U U U U U U U U $ N 'RSo N � b d N 7 Q YYY.. N a` r r O M a'3 Ey it `o o� O N F C r 0 r 0 Q C 0 0 C •� � W E ac°�4 0 S �p a,N��RR OJ � O! 0• m 0 �l N mmSmm�s�m�m� §rms m� in m O N 0f N N N= m 0 O m N 0 m W 0 0 0 m 0 0 00 0 00000000 $ mm 00 00 T W N OI W N N m N T Ol Ol IN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a e v v e a a v a a a e N N N N N N N N N N N N F CU7 CU7 (�7 fU'J CUJ [U7 UU' (�7 CU9 UU' fU9 l�J 4 1 -1m O � O 0 C? N [? N 60000 C ' N N N d I r O^ n 0 E e �j V � C N Y Zq 5 Y m 6 a m vi N N - N Im r Z D j -11 o °o m m m m m m w a m m N N N N N N N N N N a v v a a C? c y m n f070 aU co Ua' t�l m d Q Q U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U r N Z 5 n� Y W � a m CL 0 (7Q dNN 1J 1p 1� NN gQg QggI O)N 0 O �FRSRR ,`h$, R Q Q Q 3 A Z E `o m Q f7 d d t7 N t7 t7 t7 ay N N N N N N N N N N N f(G 7 fp m � S c UUU n OXIy d Q Q U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U r N Z 5 n� Y W � a m CL U 0 O e Wp G Q Q Q 3 A Z E `o T Y Y Y � S c UUU n OXIy z z z °_ m A 5 N {Y,� Im 1A 1q h n A n n n h h n r h n n h n Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 m tp 4p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C c C C D 7> 7 7 » > 7 7 » 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c�c�cD 0ac�c� aoc�c�ooc�cc0 mmm mc�oc�c�oo mmm5 m0 0 mmmmmmmmmmm0 �� N N N 1 n n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Np(' Y Y d s (11V N N N N N T N N N H T N fit] T T N T N T 19 T C7 U' C7 � �/ (7 C7 C7 UC7 C7 c7 C7 t7U U' C7 C7 f7 C7 C7 UC7 (7 C7 U' C7 U' C7 C7 N v C7 C7 U' (7 (7 (7 C7 C7 (7 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C7 (7 C7 a s Ry a C LL m c D Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Nate: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System. and Iwo -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue 1DOR1 Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items r- 0 7 a� W O J a 7 i E 2 a. 3 N A C 3 O H F; C 7 C E W a L) g y e e q q e e e e e e q q e e e e e e e e q q e e e e e e e e e e e y e e q e e e e e N e N N m m m N N< O t0 t0 j m; N e N N m e A o A o o m o o m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N o o c91 N b N m m N N N e � � � � � � � � � � � � N N N N N e W W N m � a `s 2 2 aG `OL C'VN'ON CCmq i" '3E o n � Z� g m� W •pc ma UC)Sm N N m m e e 'ggam b m n m m m m Q m N W e S m4 ZZ `os3Sgb o� 0.4�QLYN ttie eixss 88= �6tvnA2 CvNi cy O W W IY W W W IL W W W W W W W S 3 m Q Y� m W LL S LL b E s E `W `W b b b b b b m b b b N b b b b N A �j e m b b b b b Y N N Z ^ m r r n n A A r A A r n n n n n N O A A A A A m 3asW Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y mmmmmmmmmmmm�WSgao�a��as ` °�8cs n r A m f0 K C] t 7 N m 07 N C 7 N e Y 6 e t 7 m m r ^ ^ ^ n ^ l L p O] N N o CJ O r r n^ N r A n n Y Y yiY t W 1c m W W v= 1c0 m= = Y Y g g J G W W m W Y Y G Y Y Yf Y Y Y Y ammSWE I IFLS.OMSm a91FL��mmmmmaaaaa88mmaammmmm mm lJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y a N N N N N N N N N N N N - N N N N N N N N lV N 7 7 7 0oc�aac CDC000000oCDCD0 (50000a CD000�c��m °nmoc�c�c�o(D (D ED C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 W W m W O W W W W 0 W W m W W W W m W W W W'W W W W W W W W 0 0 W N W W $$ $$$ a$$$$$$ $$$$ 3Co aao00000ED C!,8 9CD0N0C9 mm mmmmmma0mmm mmmm A Ap p r A o N N N N o n A A A o NN NN o r p n o n o 0 ON o n o o n o n o r n n n A p A r p A n o ON N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N b b b b b T b b b b b b b b T b b b b b b b b mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm N N N 0 0 0 LP b N 0 0 0 n o 0 N r r N N N r n r Y Y Y m m m a m C 4 n N N N 7 7 7 m m m o (Da m C O 0 CD N N N N N N N N N N N N a a a m b b mmm x m O1 a m C LL m 0 C 32 C7 eCJ Ol grg gNgg tONMb �SR3�E OlmmgOf Cgg) grg rlgg7 grg b N�-�gg grgrg rN N SRE R33� nm� bgn Cl geg �E8 E rN n R�NE$ ��An `eam m cif �m Fm r: m m y� M �mE�'� "� 2 2 iii e`9i'92'ai MM � 9222 2Bi2 'ai 'PiN cg 93 O O a r- 0 7 a� W O J a 7 i E 2 a. 3 N A C 3 O H F; C 7 C E W a L) g y e e q q e e e e e e q q e e e e e e e e q q e e e e e e e e e e e y e e q e e e e e N e N N m m m N N< O t0 t0 j m; N e N N m e A o A o o m o o m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N o o c91 N b N m m N N N e � � � � � � � � � � � � N N N N N e W W N m � a `s 2 2 aG `OL C'VN'ON CCmq i" '3E o n � Z� g m� W •pc ma UC)Sm N N m m e e 'ggam b m n m m m m Q m N W e S m4 ZZ `os3Sgb o� 0.4�QLYN ttie eixss 88= �6tvnA2 CvNi cy O W W IY W W W IL W W W W W W W S 3 m Q Y� m W LL S LL b E s E `W `W b b b b b b m b b b N b b b b N A �j e m b b b b b Y N N Z ^ m r r n n A A r A A r n n n n n N O A A A A A m 3asW Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y mmmmmmmmmmmm�WSgao�a��as ` °�8cs n r A m f0 K C] t 7 N m 07 N C 7 N e Y 6 e t 7 m m r ^ ^ ^ n ^ l L p O] N N o CJ O r r n^ N r A n n Y Y yiY t W 1c m W W v= 1c0 m= = Y Y g g J G W W m W Y Y G Y Y Yf Y Y Y Y ammSWE I IFLS.OMSm a91FL��mmmmmaaaaa88mmaammmmm mm lJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y a N N N N N N N N N N N N - N N N N N N N N lV N 7 7 7 0oc�aac CDC000000oCDCD0 (50000a CD000�c��m °nmoc�c�c�o(D (D ED C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 W W m W O W W W W 0 W W m W W W W m W W W W'W W W W W W W W 0 0 W N W W $$ $$$ a$$$$$$ $$$$ 3Co aao00000ED C!,8 9CD0N0C9 mm mmmmmma0mmm mmmm A Ap p r A o N N N N o n A A A o NN NN o r p n o n o 0 ON o n o o n o n o r n n n A p A r p A n o ON N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N b b b b b T b b b b b b b b T b b b b b b b b mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm N N N 0 0 0 LP b N 0 0 0 n o 0 N r r N N N r n r Y Y Y m m m a m C 4 n N N N 7 7 7 m m m o (Da m C O 0 CD N N N N N N N N N N N N a a a m b b mmm x m O1 a m C LL m 0 C 32 C7 Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 173 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non- professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items pC J o N 7 b Q LL N J 7 m Q E CA Z� CA d O 0 8 C 3 O F C CD e E W aU N N N n N a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 9. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a N m m m m m m m m N m m m m m m m N m JOJJJJJJJJJJJbJJJJJ �sErz §m ��g� molo m E m bj'N NIh �-n vi mica mm mmm W 1 O N O O 7 � � � �2 �� N N N N O O W O< r m ac ac R m m m m m m n o N a m § § § § S S 8 o S o o § § § § § 4 § Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y `�nS$°daaaa�aaaaaaaaaaa N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C c c c C C C C C C C C C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 oo0C5aa0o0 o000 0 000000 c m s m c C C c m c m e o 18 00 0000 oocU$ n n n n n n n r n n n n n r n n n n n n NRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (7 JC7 C7 (7 U' U' C7 C7 U' C7 C7 G C7 U' (7JJ U' � U C7 U' U' [7 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C7 (7 U' (7 C7 [7 C7m E o EEEEEE�� m O a o 0 00.= ce a v pC J o N 7 b Q LL N J 7 m Q E CA Z� CA d O 0 8 C 3 O F C CD e E W aU N N N n N a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 9. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a N m m m m m m m m N m m m m m m m N m JOJJJJJJJJJJJbJJJJJ �sErz §m ��g� molo m E m bj'N NIh �-n vi mica mm mmm W 1 O N O O 7 � � � �2 �� N N N N O O W O< r m ac ac R m m m m m m n o N a m § § § § S S 8 o S o o § § § § § 4 § Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y `�nS$°daaaa�aaaaaaaaaaa N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C c c c C C C C C C C C C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 oo0C5aa0o0 o000 0 000000 c m s m c C C c m c m e o 18 00 0000 oocU$ n n n n n n n r n n n n n r n n n n n n NRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (7 JC7 C7 (7 U' U' C7 C7 U' C7 C7 G C7 U' (7JJ U' � U C7 U' U' [7 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C7 (7 U' (7 C7 [7 C7m N < < Y Y J J J J J A I O o o N `o N S 7 q W m 0 m 0 N [" m 3 E m m m r Y Y Y Y m m m S S 1g'. 7 7 7 7 m ei m m io m a a a a seas c�CDoo �O N N N N N I N N N N a N 1� V 0 v e e a N N m m m m g O a UU 0 C a _ 0 F a � I N R N N a m (7 ewe N ti m O U z `m E U C 7 a c� R N N a o ''m (U7 N W W W W W W W W me�i�mc�e�mm� m N m m m m m o O N N N N N N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 e a g e a a a v e 000000000 f N 0 � N N (O fN'1 N m N N; N N N m o :: � N Q m � � � � � N N m G J W `o z m `o > n C C C C C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ED n( oaooa o o C7 U' 0 (7O (7 C7 CD 0 m m m m m m m m m RRRRRRRRR N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v a a a a a a v a N C7 C7 U C7 (7 (7 C7 C7 U' V 0 a C LL d R W a O C7 m o 0 00.= ce a v N < < Y Y J J J J J A I O o o N `o N S 7 q W m 0 m 0 N [" m 3 E m m m r Y Y Y Y m m m S S 1g'. 7 7 7 7 m ei m m io m a a a a seas c�CDoo �O N N N N N I N N N N a N 1� V 0 v e e a N N m m m m g O a UU 0 C a _ 0 F a � I N R N N a m (7 ewe N ti m O U z `m E U C 7 a c� R N N a o ''m (U7 N W W W W W W W W me�i�mc�e�mm� m N m m m m m o O N N N N N N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 e a g e a a a v e 000000000 f N 0 � N N (O fN'1 N m N N; N N N m o :: � N Q m � � � � � N N m G J W `o z m `o > n C C C C C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ED n( oaooa o o C7 U' 0 (7O (7 C7 CD 0 m m m m m m m m m RRRRRRRRR N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v a a a a a a v a N C7 C7 U C7 (7 (7 C7 C7 U' V 0 a C LL d R W a O C7 g m N N fy w jTjz G O �S �S c+i ahi� ci m dSm m chim'�i `� �i semi �i `dim m �i Z O `m N N N N n d N N [7 O d C1 (mil (? d, w, 1� O t0 R n r N N N O � m W lw�l Pwl e N N N N N N O1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o d d 000000000 9 C O)0m min .n �nm M mm mmin m T L9 N eegd O F e dggeddq d p°� bOmm ddcB8i ppti O BJ �dppdc88iJ 8tib 8d b d88 Sd cpp�ppi ti{� b J�jS dm o dpp�pp a p¢f pp d8 odm o8 om bQ c8iti oyJ m 0 m V N O N N N m O N m N m t'1 IN I �f N m 0 m (O m m m N 0 m N N > > > mm m N N oc Jm pM� a m O a 6 0 T Z Lq Y A (y V Q m m J t2 d '(�gy7 d r Q .-d Z Z; m ttm]] 0 ul m $ U s m N N N N r ffi O mi Z V n g 1n pi m n nC a o� E $ E m�wm_�ymy++yNy Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Z S E S s 's' at 9 A` N 8 -_ y{' mm��mmm - t� ^'-�� 'm m Y m r- m Y C� 0 emmfg M Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N y Ny++ N N C C C C NN N N N N cj ci N ci N N N N N N N m N" m N [O v-' t Cd S ey� w y G 19 19 C 19 '9 C C C C C G m C C C C w C C C C C C J J 7 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J o g ti 9$ S m if i m sf i if g JF !? i 2 ' E m m g m m m 8 m m m m m S m m m m m m m m m m W m m m m m 0 c�oc�c�oac�oa�ac� (�c�c�c�c�ac�c� c� oc�ac� o c�ooac�c�oc�c� mm m mm 8 °`m`m °mm 8m8 m88 °mmm�m o o 0 0 3 D3 39 8 0 m 0 39 3 3 o QSQ C7 C7 0 p00 ppC7 (7 (7 C7 ppO Q30pa p Cpl Cp7O (7 (p7 (yp7 [p7 Cp7 (7 pp�(cocu7 CD (D V N R N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 20 O O O O O O O O O O O M O N F O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C r W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q. C O' 00 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w d d e e d e d e d d d d d e e e F CE m� W(q moo �q .q �q �?<o Wm�?191c 1?T m 19 Fl r N I'D mmmmg wn °S �o� 777�c777c�77��7�7777c7c� d�c�m d�c7c�it7m c�� a d d V Q C700000(7000 U' a 0 0 a a Ja'D J3 of o ? U' 0a 00 C7w d• C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C7 (7 C4 x a x a a 7 m R a LL m m m L Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Proms Appraiser's Land Use Codes and 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous" 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items a D 2 `p 2 o m W 0 is AN �m J O a E if N 0 c N .,= C s O F T C c E 3 C 0 S W 'ac�au' m cng� N amggur fe m m O$� N m N N a e e a y 0 0 0 e y a CS660R a R,6 U 9- 19 N g E R 11: 1 a z i CIF m m> > m i F N �2 O O O m a 0 U d N � m y d L m N N C3 m J J 0� 88 Y m m m m m m m Cp Y Y Y Y Y Y 86 m m Yim ai cemroai Yi 'o Yi 7 J > > > > 7 7 ai m m o m m m gym, ai m Coco pm mmpaamas=@mm 'b 0 3 o b S 000 coo C90 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v< <v «avvv �2 �2 �2 UC7 C7 C7 ('7 (7U C7 C7U C7 (7 C5 UC7 (7 C7 C7 UU r N e m N 6 N e N 000000 O O O O O O e y y e e e e e g e e e 000000000000 N N N N � ; � � - A N N m (y m mpp N eq C m 6^ m CI < N N tb m^y N m g r $ $ $ $ N N N N N N N N N N N N rnnr��n �nnnnr c c c c c c e c c c J J J J J J J J J J J J mmmmmmm�mmmm 000000000000 !m �m m 3c CCD a 00 $C) (900 CD NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N vvvvvvavavvv UC7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 UC7 oC7N a r o m m ur n Q l0 fNO M m m M Curl, t9, [O, t0, O N O O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lV O aaaaaaaaaa�a > >> >�m O e e 0 0 m 0 0 0 m m° pC0 O U a m m o eg m�s g W r W m .tl —o a CA sss -- (p�� N N N N N N N N N N N N c c c c c c c c c c c c J J J J J J J J J J J J m m m m m m m m ( 0�ao00a�o�a m 9 D S -5 c m m S l$ 2 o° 00000 0000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m e e a e e e e e e e e e C�C70007 (7 C7 U' C7007 C7 � U(7 UC7 C7 (7 C7 (7 (7 (7 (7 (7N u N N Lq b 0� N - O 0000000 aa�aaaa RMF 6 N i N m m i m O m m t� n 0 Q Q a m 7 m 5 6 s sa I. R IL litm m m id�g id g m s d Sam m o ma aaaaaoc°� f -mg &821 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N vvvvv a I c 0 a W C LL m m 0 0 Appendix A -1 Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two -digit numbers refer to Collier County Property Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue [DORI Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Off 17 18 19 23 24 124 Ho 39 Ice and Professional Services Office Buildings [Non- professional, one -story] Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] Professional Services Buildings Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] Insurance Company Offices el and Motel Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive-in Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van ix Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items Q o m 1p W OI m W N I(I n N N m w O O N O O O N N O O N O O E m �mQqe� (Qwm(��°w W O°f (W(��(pp(�� NN NNN NNNw nnnnnn nnn�n n n 'j Q� m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fmO tam fG c d m U. p a mm pp pp pp a m m m e g g Ip f0 CO G 0 N V^ ^ N n W t7 f0 O r W h fe0 N h tnO. O O Om 0 I� V 0 N l'� N w m w W N O m fV N - m- N V O O- m N n m 0 0 b m N O r OO n Ol N N O O' 00 m� fV J C Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p C W J J J J J J J J J J U U U U U J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J U U IV a a a a a a a a a a a 4 a a ? ajp a a a a a a a a a a a n n c`v o e W n m m mmq {{ypp m m W cn m O] t9 t7 (O N e r W ; Appendix A -1 • •_il • • Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System . and two-digit numbers refer to Collier County Propedy Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Department of Revenue FDOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 173 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S &L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -In Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution & Trucking Terminals, Van & Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas & Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items N N 'pO pQ O S p O pp dpS�p( I r OQ O e N N N tLLVVV tttVV m N N Iq 1^!) 2 O 0 o a N N O O O O O O r d O G O 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 r d C m Q V J Q v C N Q 9m J r C ESS o 2 9 ul r H 28 o�O N H m O f/1 « C 3 F r C E 7 W a v 7777-77777N77'7777777 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U > > > > > > > > > >> O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d m m ¢ zaaaaaam��m�m � C C t C C mq m mm n n n n U U U V V c m m IZ N m m m tl t7 vi d b N m b'd m Y Y Y Y Y Y 'Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ffimffiffiffiaffim�mmib Ma��m i• r S C 1" r i' .. r t r r ,Y. yy�� y. .- y+ r r Z I Ir!i99i�i ILas9 3 s s s s s s s s s s s f s s s c s nnnnn nnnnn nw.w o nonw w0 mm UJ tllm NmtlJm m m E E.9 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E N O �[I N m N •[1 m m N m N N N N N i(f N N IA N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O m m U w i E U m rF r O O a a ❑ f 2 a m m a n of N em �dpm °m N N N N ^ r N N m m of d e Rey mCq16$ 1�w mN 16 c O m m U w i E U m rF r O O a a ❑ f 2 a m m a n of N em �dpm °m N N N N m a a�aa O m m U w i E U m rF r O O a a ❑ f 2 a m m a n of N em �dpm °m N N N N m e e d d N iY N m 8 Wall 8 N m m N N N N dc��oc� o ❑�c7c� N N 0 0 0 0 O O }aQaN{ N O �p(p N O Q � W � S E d N N N N N N N N N ^ d m N m N N O m m e m m > > 7 7 7 > > a a a a a a a a Q O O m 7 tR m N m U m O a r r r V 'mm N aqC � r m ie m n aQ a t ^O p 5 0 0 0 6 p y+ e y N m N -lei __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 R > 7 7 J > > a aqm amm a a a ym� Yq Ym Y Y Y Yq Yp J J J J J J J PPP PPP �' P AAT IE OT 8 cl m @12 amrmaW�a g 2-- g a y i c �c�3388w3 N N N N N N H m N N O O b � N N N N N N N N S m N N N N N N m N N N N N N N c7c�oc�c�c�c�c�v. u O O [7 N O O N N 66 N r r N m 6 m ro ^ rN �Q m U 2 m sa 4 Z m m m w w mm mm Z 2 N N m f0 pN N N N R� lV N N � 11 m O) cam. C LL m m O 0 Appendix A -1 COLLIER COUNTY COMMERCIAL LAND -USE CATEGORIES Note: Three -digit numbers refer to Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System and Iwo -digit numbers refer to Collier County Propea Appraiser's Land Use Codes and Florida Del2artment of Revenue [DOR] Codes. 121 Retail Sales and Service 10 Vacant Commercial 11 Stores 13 Department Stores 14 Supermarkets 15 Regional Shopping Centers 16 Community Shopping Centers 21 Restaurants, Cafeterias 22 Drive -In Restaurants 25 Repair Service Shops [excluding Automotive] 26 Service Stations 27 Automotive Sales [1213] 33 Nightclubs, Cocktail Lounges, Bars 122 Wholesale Sales and Services 29 Wholesale Outlets, Produce Houses, Manufacturing Outlets 30 Florists, Greenhouses 123 Office and Professional Services 17 Office Buildings [Non - professional, one -story] 18 Office Buildings [Non - professional, multi -story] 19 Professional Services Buildings 23 Financial Institutions [Banks, S&L's, Credit Services] 24 Insurance Company Offices 124 Hotel and Motel 39 Hotels, Motels 125 Cultural and Entertainment 31 Drive -in Theater, Open Stadium 32 Enclosed Theater, Auditorium 34 Bowling Alleys, Skating Rinks, Pool Halls, Enclosed Areas 35 Tourist Attractions, Permanent Exhibits, Other Entertainment Other Miscellaneous* 20 Marine Terminals, Piers, Marinas 42 Manufacturing 38 Golf Courses, Driving Ranges 48 Warehousing, Distribution ix Trucking Terminals, Van ix Storage Warehousing 72 Private Schools & Colleges 86 Counties Other Than Public Schools Including Non - Municipal 88 Federal Government 91 Utility, Gas lx Electricity, Telephone, Water /Sewer Service, Radio/Television "Miscellaneous" items are listed for reader information only. "Other" code items m29 29 mA993 NN n��NNmmrommm O d O LL N 0 0 A ^^ O N p p mm p pp pp 8 p pG 0p N G 0 G 0 G Ci IQ c; - C W 0 0 - N N h C w O O O O W Crl. Ol O O O OO m 9 41 C N c N N N tai ' U U O== O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 No � J J J w¢ 2 0 m w w w w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a �F LL J � N S n N N � L n n n n n n 0 0 0 0 c c" m V < Y O m m A A ��a aaaa m m o m m N S j m m m m m a`o J �m� a$9�@ 29199 a a m m m m m w CD g J A J J J Ym �' U -�i m N a '� b m �U V UUUU A � o_? E m Y i 80 m o °g W RU'm 8 2 2$ m :mmm' m m m w i z a [7 O g ts7 s g` g S t V °m E E E E E E y c w m m a m U U cg w w w w w w Q s c fp �� O! T� m N tp �p {p m 01 W 0 1� OJ N p y N tNp imp N N m N N N (Jy�1 X [[VO Ol Ol m m O Ot t0 t0 t0 m N m N N w� IA tR N N N N N N N N N N V (y m W c O � OD C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m w T c m�� F L� o o m rn w m a m rn m m m a m m a m m rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�� ow N g w w e e a v a a a v a a e a a a e e a w w w w w w win n w �0 m m JIr c a m IM e m S 3 c c E N n n n s m o m m,L N N m a m 0 U co a a� LL m W C7 m a c� Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study III. RETAIL DEMAND FORECASTS Page III -1 The analysis of retail demand in the Primary Trade Area (PTA) begins with population and household -size projections derived from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) high -range es- timates and applied to the County's respective planning - community districts by the Comprehensive Planning Section. BEBR's countywide totals were disaggregated based on the share of growth in the Planning Community District (PCD) area included in a Pri- mary Trade Area (PTA). Per - capita- income (PCI) data is derived from Woods &Poole Eco- nomics, Inc. and PCI forecasts are in "constant" 1996- dollar amounts. Ex- penditure estimates are incorporated into a step -by -step analysis of commer- cial acreage and square footage required to satisfy forecasted demand. Demand calculations are based upon documented sales- per- square- foot (SPF) for commercial space and a density determination, expressed as a floor -area ratio (FAR), to predict the acreage requirement for the area under study. - A Commercial Demand Study (October, 2003) conducted by the County's Comprehensive Planning Section reassessed early estimates pro- vided by the Reynolds, Smith & Hills (RSH) Market and Commercial Land Use Study (May 1988). The reassessment improved the rigor and appropri- ateness of this analysis. Analysts examining the retail- demand calculations that follow should be mindful of the important definitions listed below. Sales Per Square Foot (SPF): For 1986, determined to be $175.09 based upon the total measurable sales for the year of $1,008,788,987 divided by 5,761,514 million square feet (sq. ft.) of commercial space according to the 1988 Market and Commercial Land Use Study (page II -40). For 1995, sales per square foot was determined to be $220.87 according to calculations made by the County's Comprehensive Planning Section and based upon 1995 Collier County measurable sales of $3,223,592,288 divided by 14,594,655 sq. ft. of commercial space (Unincorporated County: 10,347,911 sq. ft.; City of Naples: 4,246,744 sq. ft.). The SPF calculation provided in the 2003 Study reflects property - appraiser defined land uses that correspond closely to the Census' definition of retail -sales outlets. The 2003 Study determined SPF to be $223.56 based on projected retail sales of $3,431,270,000 and a countywide commercial square- footage estimate of 15,348,589 square feet. For the purposes of the retail- demand calculations that follow, SPF is rounded up to $225.00 leading to a more conservative demand forecast. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Defined as the percent of lot coverage, or the ratio of retail floor area to overall land area, determined by the 1988 Market and Commercial Land Use Study to be: 17.26 percent in 1986, expressed as a ratio of 0. 1726, and estimated to be 0.1765 in 1990. As an example of a con- tinuing readjustment of the FAR, the County's Comprehensive Planning Sec- tion recalculated the FAR in 1995 to represent 17.85 percent for the Urban Estates Planning Community District (PCD), or a ratio of 0.1785. The 2003 County study has reassessed the previous findings reported above and determined that the FAR for areas selected by the County for study ranged from 18.82 percent to 21.65 percent depending on whether ho- tels /motels and theaters are included or excluded from the analysis. Corre- spondingly, a "rounded -off' FAR of 20.00 percent was utilized in the conver- sion of supportable square feet to supportable acreage. For the purposes of this analysis, a FAR of 0.200 will be utilized for the years 2000 to 2010. Twenty (20) percent of any subject site or parcel will be considered as the floor space of a commercial structure and the remaining 80 percent will, presumably, be devoted to secondary uses, namely landscaping, open space, parking, and stormwater management. Dwelling Units (DU): An estimate calculated by dividing projected population by persons - per - household data from the 2000 U.S. Census for the period 2000 to 2010. Dwelling Unit Income (DUI): An estimate calculated by multiplying per capita income by persons - per - household. Total Area Income (TAI): An estimate calculated by multiplying by dwelling -unit household income by the number of dwelling units. Retail Expenditure (RE) Forecast: Determined by the 2003 Study to be 35.00 percent of total personal income. The 35- percent share of personal in- come is applied to TAI to forecast retail expenditures for the study areas for each of the analyzed time periods: 2000, 2005, and 2010. Retail Demand Calculation (RDC): Calculation of the acreage required to satisfy forecasted retail demand according to sales per square foot and FAR is determined by application of the following procedures: 1. Dividing projected sales by sales per square foot to determine support- able square feet; 2. Multiplying supportable square feet by 1.05 for the normal 5 percent vacancy factor; and 3. Dividing the total square feet by 43,560, the square feet in an acre, and the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.200 to determine the acreage require- _ ment for the study area. Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -3 The resulting calculation of retail demand depicts the difference be- tween the existing, zoned commercial acreage and the forecasted demand for each year of the analysis. The analysis assumes that any forecasted deficits for later years, 2015 and 2020, are too subject to estimating errors to docu- ment properly any growing deficit of actual acreage and the estimates of likely new retail demand generated by population increases after the year 2010. Planning Considerations and Problem Setting Unique features related to the site of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara deserve special consideration in planning for new commercial retail uses at that location. The Primary Trade Area (PTA) for the subject site established in Section I and Section II of this Study has been determined to be well lo- cated to serve the goods and services needs of the surrounding residential communities, within convenient travel distance to the site, and the traveling public. The site's location on Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886) situates it per- fectly next to a well - traveled arterial road that is used extensively by resi- dents of the Urban Estates commuting from their residence to their work at Naples -area businesses. This "pass -by" traffic will likely create traveler inter- est in using a convenience retail facility on the site. Consequently, this retail- demand analysis will commence with Table 3.01 providing estimates based on growing demand in the Golden Gate Cen- sus Designated Place (CDP), also known as Golden Gate City. A complemen- tary analysis calculating retail demand in the Urban Estates will follow in Table 3.02 Table 3.01 COMMERCIAL LAND -USE DEMAND CALCULATION (2000 -2010) Estimated Supportable Acreage Growth in the Golden Gate CDP Population Projections Per Capita Income (PCI) Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PP Dwelling Units (DU) Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) Total Area Income (TAI) Retail Demand Forecast: Retail Expenditures (RE) Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) Supportable Square Feet (SSF) Supportable Sq. Ft. (5% vacan Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Supportable Acreage (SA) 2000 20,951 $15,923 DU) 3.21 6,518 $51,113 $333,154,534 $116,604,087 $225.00 518,240 t) 544,152 0.200 62.46 2005 25,401 $17,296 3.21 7,010 $55,520 $389,195,200 $136,218,320 $244.00 558,272 586,186 0.200 67.28 2010 27,422 $18,713 3.21 7,501 $60,069 $450,577,569 $ 157,702,149 $264.00 597,357 627,225 0.200 72.00 Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -4 Collier County's 2003 Commercial Demand Study concludes that: "In short, these findings suggest that population and income growth can sup- port additional commercial space within the Golden Gate (Urban Estates) area. However, other factors deserve careful consideration when interpreting these results. Namely, availability of real estate immediately adjacent to the study areas is recognized (as a factor) in helping to serve retail needs." Further, the 2003 Study advises that: "The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) defines a Neighborhood Center as possessing a primary trade area of 3 miles or less and a Community Center as one pos- sessing a primary trade area of 3 -6 miles. ICSC also gives a site acreage range of 3 -15 acres for Neighborhood Centers, and 10 -40 acres for Community Centers." The rapid growth of the Urban Estates requires a recalculation of retail demand that will reflect its burgeoning population. Table 3.02 makes that recalculation. Table 3.02 represents Urban Estates demand based on 2005 population estimates provided by Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Section. Table 3.02 COMMERCIAL LAND -USE DEMAND CALCULATION (2000 -2010) Estimated Supportable Acreage Growth in the Urban Estates 2000 249 2010 Population Projections 16,713 35,606 57,484 Per Capita Income (PCI) $28,117 $30,541 $33,041 Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PPDU) 2.46 2.46 2.46 Dwelling Units (DU) 6,794 14,474 23,367 Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) $69,168 $75,131 $81,281 Total Area Income (TAI) $469,926,169 $1,087,444,068 $1,899,289,856 Retail Demand Forecast: Retail Expenditures (RE) $1 Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) Supportable Square Feet (SSF) Supportable Sq. Ft. (5% vacant) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Supportable Acreage (SA) Zoned Commercial Acreage 64,474,159 $380,605,424 $225.00 $244.00 730,996 767,546 0.200 88.10 +233.24 1,559,858 1,637,851 0.200 187.99 +45.25 $664,751,449 $264.00 2,517,998 2,643,898 0.200 303.48 (70.24) In sum, the calculation demonstrates that the Urban Estates will have a deficit of 70.24 acres in zoned commercial acreage by 2010, an increase of 60.53 acres over the 9.71 -acre deficit based on earlier estimates of the Urban Estates population released earlier by Collier County's Comprehensive Plan- ning Section (Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Commercial Demand Study Golden Gate Urban Estates Planning Commu- nity, October, 2003). bn U)o Ww T d' o� U 0 0 � U 1 F N 0 U W W N It T LYS Q a n a 1 � O I O n OD °m O O 6, d I 1 t0 T 00 0) a M ,W zoo° mN 0 N r C7 a A n �Mn, DADE COUNtt CDUNTY COLLIER COIINW r Q p d V� oa � o r o T 003 O O a� Olt C.) co aHS 0oZ ;t b ¢� a s04 lh [gsg T pbo Ow HI a U Z mjq T d' n + 1 N d vi w f7 T J <JN: �yT V O lh a °m V W I�l r Q p d V� oa � o r o T 003 O O a� Olt C.) co aHS 0oZ ;t b ¢� a s04 lh [gsg T pbo Ow HI a U Z mjq Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market- Conditions Study Page III -5 At the time of this writing, the only recent effort to add commercial capacity to the Urban Estates planning community was the Board of County Commissioners approval in 2005 of a plan- amendment petition for the Van- derbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict permitting retail and other uses at the northeast corner of CR -881 and CR -862. As yet, no de- velopment activity has commenced within the new Subdistrict. The next step in the demand analysis is to evaluate retail demand in the Zip Code of the Study's Primary Trade Area (PTA). The population, per- sons per dwelling unit, and per capita income data were derived from the U. S. Census reports for Postal Zip Code Area 34116 (See attached Fact Sheet — American Factfinder — Zip Code Tabulation Area 34116 and Collier County Zip Code map). The following Table 3.03 estimates retail demand in Postal Zip Code Area 34116 only (See map on facing page). The rate of population growth was calculated to reflect the pace of growth in the host Golden Gate Plan- ning Community District of over 22.00 percent for both 5 -year periods in Table 3.03 below: Table 3.03 COMMERCIAL LAND -USE DEMAND CALCULATION (2000 -2010) Estimated Supportable Acreage Growth In Zip Code Area 34116 Population Projections Per Capita Income (PCI) Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PPD Dwelling Units (DU) Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) Total Area Income (TAI) Retail Demand Forecast: Retail Expenditures (RE) Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) Supportable Square Feet (SSF) Supportable Sq. Ft. (5% vacant Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Supportable Acreage (SA) 2000 25,170 $17,756 U) 3.09 8,137 $54,866 $446,444,642 $156,255,625 $225.00 694,469 ) 729,193 0.200 83.70 2003 30,707 $19,287 3.09 9,938 $59,597 $592,274,986 $207,296,245 $244.00 849,575 892,054 0.200 102.39 2010 37,462 $20,867 3.09 12,124 $64,479 $781,743,396 $273,610,189 $264.00 1,036,402 1,088,222 0.200 124.91 At the time of this writing, ascertaining zoned commercial acreage within the Primary Trade Area (PTA) component of Postal Zip Code Area 34116 cannot be calculated easily for 2005 and 2010 until pending EAR - based and other private sector amendments to the Collier County Compre- hensive Growth Management Plan are considered and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page III -6 For the year 2000, the closest calculation of zoned commercial acreage was based on 1998 data from the Property Appraiser and would not reflect accurately actual conditions at the time of the 2000 U. S. Census, the basis for the well - documented data provided in Table 3.03 for the year 2000. Section IV will provide Study recommendations. Section V is an Appendix providing other documentation. Table DP -1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida °or information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total population .......................... 20,951 100.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population .......................... 20,951 100.0 SEX AND AGE Hispanic or Latino (of any race) ................ 7,781 37.1 Male ......... ............................... 11.055 52.8 Mexican.... ............................... 3,529 16.8 Female ....... ............................... 9,896 47.2 Puerto Rican ............................... 765 3.7 Under 5 years ............................... 1,815 8.7 Cuban ..... ............................... Other Hispanic or Latino .................... 1,660 1,827 7.9 8.7 5 to 9 years .. ............................... 1,818 8.7 Not Hispanic or Latino ........................ 13,170 62.9 10 to 14 years ............................... 1,656 7.9 White alone. 10,402 49.6 15 to 19 years ............................... 1,710 8.2 ............................... 20 to 24 years ............................... 1,735 8.3 RELATIONSHIP 25 to 34 years ............................. .. 3,927 18.7 Total population .......................... 20,951 100.0 35 to 44 years ............................... 3,620 17.3 In households. ............................... 20,922 99.9 45 to 54 years ............................... 2,112 10.1 Householder ............................... 6,518 31.1 55 to 59 years ............................... 707 3.4 Spouse ............................ ....... 3,557 17.0 60 to 64 years ............................... 555 2.6 Child....... ............................... 6,679 31.9 65 to 74 years ............................... 733 3.5 Own child under 18 years ................ 5,509 26.3 75 to 84 years ............................... 459 2.2 Other relatives ............................. 2,017 9.6 85 years and over ............................ 104 0.5 Under 18 years ......................... 575 2.7 Median age ( years) ............................ 29.6 (X) Nonrelatives ............................... 2,151 10.3 Unmarried partner ....................... 515 2.5 18 years and over ............... ............. 14,653 69.9 In group Quarters ............................. 29 0.1 Male ....... ............................... 7,805 37.3 Institutionalized population................... - - Female ..... ............................... 6,848 32.7 Noninstitutionalized population............... 29 0.1 21 years and over ............................ 13,633 65.1 62 years and over ............................ 1,593 7.6 HOUSEHOLD BY TYPE 65 years and over ............................ 1,296 6.2 Total households ......................... 6,518 100.0 Male ....... ............................... 577 2.8 Farnily households (famifies)................... 5,012 76.9 Female ..... ............................... 719 3.4 With own children under 18 years.......... 2,906 44.6 Married - couple family ....................... 3,557 54.6 RACE With own children under 18 years .......... 2,027 31.1 One race ..... ............................... 20,049 95.7 Female householder, no husband present..... 691 13.7 White ...... ............................... 16,132 77.0 With own children under 18 years .......... 594 9.1 Black or African American ................... 2,126 10.1 Nonfamily households ........................ 1,506 23.1 American Indian and Alaska Native........... 80 0.4 Householder living alone .................... 954 14.6 Asian ...... ............................... 149 0.7 Householder 65 years and over............ 243 3.7 Asian Indian ............................. Chinese .. ............................... 50 25 0.2 0.1 Households with individuals under 18 years ..... 3,243 49.8 Fdipirro 22 0.1 Households with individuals 65 years and over .. 949 14.6 Japanese . ............................... - -_ Average household size........ ............... 3.21 (X ) Korean ... .............................. . 7 . Average family size............ .. ............ 3.44 (X) Vietnamese .............................. 32 0.2 Other Asian 1 ............................ 13 0.1 HOUSING OCCUPANCY Native Hawafian and Other Pacific Islander.... 25 0.1 Total housing units ....................... 7,010 100.0 Native Hawaiian .......................... - - Occupied housing units ....................... 6,518 93.0 Guamanian or Chamorro .................. 23 0.1 Vacant housing units.......................... 492 7.0 Samoan .. ............................... 1 - For seasonal, recreational, or 2l0 30 Other Pacific Islander P ................... 1 - occasional use.. . ........... ............. 282 4.0 Some other race ........................... 1,537 7.3 Two or more races ........................... 902 4.3 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent)............. 1.0 (X) Rental vacancy rate (percent) .................. 4.1 (X) Race alone or In combination with one or more other races:' HOUSING TENURE White ........ ............................... 16,607 79.3 Occupied housing units.................. 6,518 100.0 Black or African American ..................... 2,592 12.4 Owner- occupied housing units ................. 3,744 57.4 American Indian and Alaska Native ............. 138 0.7 Renter - occupied housing units.. . .............. 2,774 42.6 Asian ........ ............................... 197 0.9 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander...... 46 0.2 Average household size of owner - occupied units. 3.16 (X) Some other race ............................. 2,280 10.9 Average household size of renter-occupied units. 3.28 (X) - Represents zero or munds to zero. (X) Not applicable. 1 Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. P Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more of the other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000. U.S. Census Bureau ( ?.9 9S 7) Table DP-2. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida 7ata based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent SCHOOL ENROLLMENT NATIVITY AND PLACE OF BIRTH Population 3 years and over Total population .......................... 21,012 100.0 enrolled in school .................... 5,546 100.0 Native........ ............................... 13,980 66.5 Nursery school, preschool ..................... 360 6.5 Bom in United States ....................... 13,486 64.2 Kindergarten ..... ............................ 487 8.8 State of residence ........................ 5,686 27.1 Elementary school (grades 1 -8) ................ 2,755 49.7 Different state ............................ 7,800 37.1 High school (grades 9- 12) ..................... 1,398 25.2 Bom outside United States .................. 494 2.4 College or graduate school .................... 546 9.8 Foreign bom.. ............................... 7,032 33.5 Entered 1990 to March 2000 .............. 4,949 23.6 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Naturalized citizen .......................... 1,271 6.0 Population 25 years and over.......... 12,401 100.0 Not a citizen ............................... 5,761 27.4 Less than 911% grade .......................... gm to 12th grade, no diploma .................. 1,523 2,497 12.3 20.1 REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN High school graduate (includes equivalency) ..... 4,197 33.8 Total (excluding bom at sea) .............. 7,032 100.0 Some college, no degree ...................... 2,296 18.5 Europe.......... ............................ 221 3.1 Associate degree ............................. 527 4.2 Asia ............ ............................ Africa........ 203 8 2.9 0.1 Bachelor's degree ............................ 977 7.9 ............................... Oceania...... 5 0.1 Graduate or professional degree ............... 384 3.1 ............................... Latin America . ............................... 6,528 92.8 Percent high school graduate or higher ......... 67.6 (X) Northern America ............................. 67 1.0 Percent bachelor's degree or higher............ 11.0 (X) LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME MARITAL STATUS Population 5 years and over .............. 19,291 100.0 Population 15 years and over.......... 15,643 100.0 English only .. ............................... 11,027 57.2 Never married ............. ................. 5,028 32.1 Language other man English .................. 8,264 42.8 Now married, except separated ................ 8,062 51.5 Speak English less than "very welt" ........ 5,393 26.0 Separated .... ............................... 368 2.4 Spanish.... ............................... "very 6,504 33.7 Widowed ............................... 509 13 Speak English less than well" ........ 4,493 23.3 ..... Female 418 2.7 Other Indo-European languages ............. 1,523 7.9 ..... ............................... Divorced 1,676 10.7 Speak English less than "very well" ........ 790 4.1 .................................... Female ............................... 911 5.8 Asian and Pacific Island languages........... 180 0.9 ..... Speak English less than "very well" ........ 71 0.4 GRANDPARENTS AS CAREGIVERS ANCESTRY (single or multiple) Grandparent living in household with Total population .......................... 21,012 100.0 one or more own grandchildren under Total ancestries reported ............. ..... 19,046 90.6 18 years . ............................ 488 100.0 Arab. 41 0.2 Grandparent responsible for grandchildren ...... 120 .. 24.6 ... .......................... ...... .... Czech................. ........ . Danish ............................... 115 0.5 VETERAN STATUS ....... Dutch 114 0.5 Civilian population 18 years and over.. 14,646 100.0 ........ ............................... English....... ............................... 1,095 5.2 Civilian veterans ............................. 1,357 9.3 French (except Basque) ...................... 294 1.4 DISABILITY STATUS OF THE CIVILIAN French Canadian' ............................ 172 0.8 NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION German ...... ............................... Greek 1,978 65 9.4 0.3 Population 5 20 years ............... 5,637 100.0 ........ ............................... Hungarian.... ............................... 87 0.4 With a disability .. ... . ........................ 674 12.0 Irish' ......... ............................... 1.644 7.8 Population 21 to 64 years .............. 12,417 100.0 Italian........ ............................... 825 3.9 With a disability .............................. 4,010 32.3 Lithuanian.. ............................... 40 02 Percent employed .......................... 71.7 ' N Norwegian.... ............................... 66 0.3 No disability .. ............................... 8,407 67.7 Polish........... ............................ 407 1.9 Percent employed .......................... 75.3 (X) Portuguese... ............................... 54 0.3 Population 65 years and over.......... 1,226 100.0 Russian ...... ............................... 69 0.3 With a disability .............................. 547 44.6 Scotch-Irish .............. ......... ........... 154 0.7 Scottish...... ............................... 240 1.1 RESIDENCE IN 1995 Slovak ....... ............................... 10 - Population 5 years and over ........... 19,291 100.0 Subsaharan African ........................... 62 0.3 Same house in 1995 .......................... 7,814 40.5 Swedish...... ............................... 137 0.7 Different house in the U.S. in 1995 ............. 8,455 43.8 Swiss........ ............................... 50 0.2 Same county .............................. 5.459 28.3 Ukrainian..... ............................... 8 - Different county ............................ 2,996 15.5 United States or American..................... 1,552 7.4 Same slate .............................. 1.265 6.6 Welsh........ ............................... 81 0.4 Different state ............................ 1,731 9.0 West Indian (excluding Hispanic groups) ........ 1,402 6.7 Elsewhere in 1995 ............................ 3,022 15.7 Omer ancestries ............................. 8,205 39.0 -- - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. 'The data represent a combination of two ancestries shown separately in Summary File 3. Czech includes Czechoslovakian. French includes Alsa- tian. French Canadian includes Acadian/Cajun. Irish includes Celtic. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. U.S. Census Bureau Table DP -3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida ,_:Data based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text) Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent EMPLOYMENT STATUS INCOME IN 1999 Population 16 years and over............ 15,349 100.0 Households ............................. 6,462 100.0 In labor force . ............................... 10,590 69.0 Less than $10, 000 ............................ 308 4.8 Civilian labor force .......................... 10,579 68.9 $10,000 to $14 ,999........................... 268 4.1 Employed ............................... 10,288 67.0 $15,000 to $24 .999........................... 852 13.2 Unemployed ............................. 291 1.9 $25.000 to $34 .999........................... 1,160 18.0 Percent of civilian labor force ............ 2.8 (X) $35,000 to $49 ,999 ........................... 1,353 20.9 Armed Forces .............................. 11 0.1 $50,000 to $74 .999........................... 1,458 22.6 Not in labor force ............................. 4,759 31.0 $75,000 to $99 ,999........................... 617 9.5 Females 16 years and over .............. 7,247 100.0 $100,000 to $149 ,999......................... $150.000 to $ 199 328 82 5.1 1.3 In labor force . ............................... 4,429 61.1 ,999......................... $200,000 or more ............................ 36 0.6 Civilian labor force .......................... 4,429 61.1 Median household income (dollars)............. 42,295 (X) Employed ............................... 4,273 59.0 Own children under 6 years .............. 2,058 100.0 With earnings. ............................... 5,856 90.6 All parents in family in labor force .............. 1,284 62.4 Mean earnings (dollars)' .................... 48,531 (X) With Social Security income ................... 969 15.0 COMMUTING TO WORK Mean Social Security income (dollars)' ....... 11,871 (X) Workers 16 years and over .............. 10,059 100.0 With Supplemental Security Income ............ 219 3.4 Car, truck, or van - - drove alone ............... 7,492 74.5 Mean Supplemental Security Income Car, truck. or van - - carpooled ................. 1,857 18.5 (dollars)' .. ............................... 6,968 (X) Public transportation (including taxicab) ......... 34 0.3 With public assistance income ................. 138 2.1 Walked ....... ............................... 164 1.6 Mean public assistance income (dollars)' ..... 1,911 (X) Other means .................. I.............. 352 3.5 With retirement income ....................... 745 11.5 Worked at home ............................. 160 1.6 Mean retirement income (dollars)'............ 18,178 (X) Mean travel time to work (minutes)' ............ 23.4 (X) Families . ............................... 4.968 100.0 Employed civilian population Less than $10, 000 ............................ 292 5.9 16 years and over ..................... 10,288 100.0 $10,000 to $14 ,999........................... 262 5.3 OCCUPATION $15,00010 $24 ,999 ........................... 607 12.2 Management, professional, and related $25,000 to $34 ,999 ........................... 826 16.6 _. occupations . ............................... 1,669 16.2 $35.000 to S49,999 ............ 1,084 21.8 ervice occupations .......................... 2,569 25.0 $50,000 to $74.999 .............. 1,122 22.6 .;ales and office occupations .................. 2,436 23.7 $75,000 to $99 ,999........................... 445 9.0 Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations....... 50 0.5 $100,000 to $ 149 ,999 ...................... . .. 255 5.1 Construction, extraction, and maintenance $150,000 to $199,999 ........... . ............. 44 0.9 occupations ............................. ... 2,277 22.1 $200,000 or more ............................. . 31 0.6 Production, transportation, and material moving Median family income (dollars) ................. 41,774 (X) occupations ............................. ... 1,287 12.5 Per capita income (dollars)' ................... 15,923 (X) INDUSTRY Median earnings (dollars): Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, Male full -time, year -round workers. ....... ... 28,630 (X)\ and mining .. ............................... 88 0.9 Female full -time, year -round workers ........... 22,911 (X)/ Construction .. ............................... 1,915 18.6 Number Percent Manufacturing . ............................... 591 5.7 below below Wholesale trade .............................. 291 2.8 poverty poverty Retail trade ......................... ......... 1,592 15.5 Subject level level Transportation and warehousing, and utilities .... 503 4.9 Information ... ............................... 108 1.0 Finance, insurance, real estate, and rental and POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 leasing ...... ............................... 556 5.4 Families .... ............................ 566 11.4 Professional, scientific, management, adminis- With related children under 18 years ............ 456 14.6 (native, and waste management services ....... 1,073 10.4 With related children under 5 years ........... 145 10.3 Educational, health and social services ......... 1,129 11.0 Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation Families with female householder, no and food services ........................... 1,483 14.4 husband present....................... 220 24.7 Other services (except public administration) .... 643 6.3 With related children under 18 years ............ 200 30.3 Public administration---- ..................... 316 3.1 With related children under 5 years........... 62 26.5 CLASS OF WORKER Individuals .............................. 2,939 14.1 Private wage and salary workers ............... 8,712 84.7 18 years and over ............................ 1,768 12.1 Government workers........ ................. 883 8.6 65 years and over.......................... 121 9.9 Self - employed workers in own not incorporated Related children under 18 years ............... 1,093 18.0 business . ............................... ... 674 6.6 Related children 5 to 17 years ............... 874 19.9 Unpaid family workers ........................ 19 0.2 Unrelated individuals 15 years and over......... 766 21.4 - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. 'If the denominator of a mean value or per capita value is less than 30, then that value is calculated using a rounded aggregate in the numerator. See text. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. 3 U.S. Census 9ureau 51,541 Table DP-4. Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics: 2000 Geographic area: Golden Gate CDP, Florida - ata based on a sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text) Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total housing units .................... 7,024 100.0 OCCUPANTS PER ROOM UNITS IN STRUCTURE Occupied housing units ............... 6,540 100.0 1 -unit, detached .............................. 3,989 56.8 1.00 or less... ............................... 5,389 82.4 1 -unit, attached ............... I.............. 352 5.0 1.01 to 1.50 .. ............................... 595 9.1 2 units .......... ............................ 507 7.2 1.51 or more .. ............................... 556 8.5 3 or 4 units ... ............................... 857 12.2 5 to 9 units ... ............................... 709 10.1 Specified owner - occupied units........ 3,261 100.0 10 to 19 units . ............................... 395 5.6 VALUE 20 or more units ............... .............. 188 2.7 Less than $50, 000............................ 28 0.9 Mobile tome .. ............................... 27 0.4 $50,000 to $99 ,999........................... 1,840 56.4 Boat, RV, van, etc ............................ - - $100,000 to $ 149 ,999......................... 1,310 40.2 $150,000 to $ 199 ,999 ......................... 68 2.1 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT $2011,000 to $299 ,999 ......................... - - 1999 to March 2000 .......................... 178 2.5 $300,000 to $ 499 ,999......................... 15 0.5 1995 to 1998 . ............................... 472 6.7 $500,000 to $ 999 ,999......................... - - 1990 to 1994 . ............................... 1,291 18.4 $1,000,000 or more ........................... - 1980 to 1989 . ............................... 3,220 45.8 Median ( dollars) .............................. 97,000 (X) 1970 to 1979 . ............................... 1,460 20.8 1960 to 1969 . ............................... 370 5.3 MORTGAGE STATUS AND SELECTED 1940 to 1959 . ............................... 16 0.2 MONTHLY OWNER COSTS 1939 or Sadler ............................... 17 0.2 With a mortgage ....... ...................... 2,821 86.5 Less than $300 .......................... 9 0.3 ROOMS $300 to $499 ............................ 23 0.7 1 room ....... ............................... 97 1.4 $500 to $699 ............................ 259 7.9 2 moms ............. .... ... .. ............ .. 608 8.7 $700 to $999 .............. ... ........... 1,505 46.2 3 rooms ...... ............................... 886 12.6 $1,000 to $1,499......................... 913 28.0 4 rooms .................. ................. .. 1,556 222 $1,500 to $1,999......................... 95 2.9 5 rooms ...... ............................... 1,578 22.5 $2,000 or more .......................... 17 0.5 6 rooms .............. .... .... ............... 1,464 20.8 Median ( dollars) ........... _.............. 909 (X) 7 rooms .... ............................... .. 613 8.7 Not mortgaged... ............................ 440 13.5 • rooms .... ............................... .. 160 2.3 Medan ( dollars ).......................... 278 (X) or ogre rooms ............................. 62 0.9 Median (moms) .............................. 47 (X) SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD Occupied housing units ............... 6,540 100.0 INCOME IN 1999 YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Less than 15.0 percent ........................ 922 28.3 1999 to Mandl 2000 .......................... 1,914 29.3 15.0 to 19.9 percent ........ .................. 536 16.4 1995 to 1998 .......... ...................... 2,368 36.2 20.0 to 24.9 percent .......................... 538 16.5 1990 to 1994 ......... ...................... 1,147 17.5 25.0 to 29.9 percent .......................... 333 10.2 1980 to 1989 . ............................... 847 13.0 30.0 to 34.9 percent.......................... 299 9.2 1970 to 1979 . ............................... 245 3.7 35.0 percent or more ......................... 590 18.1 1969 or earlier ............................... 19 0.3 Not computed. ............................... 43 1.3 VEHICLES AVAILABLE Specified renter - occupied units ........ 2,767 100.0 None ........ ............................... 275 4.2 GROSS RENT 1 ............ ............................... 2,441 37.3 Less than $200 .............................. 10 0.4 2 ............................. .............. 2.860 43.7 $200 to $299 . ............................... - - 3 or more .............................. ..... 964 14.7 $300 to $499 . ............................... 105 3.8 $500 to $749 . ............................... 1,301 47.0 HOUSE HEATING FUEL $750 to $999 . ............................... 1,154 41.7 Utility gas ........................ ........... 24 0.4 $1,000 to $1, 499 ............................. 154 5.6 Bottled, tank, or LP gas ....................... 7 0.1 $1,500 or more .............................. - - Electricity ..... ................ ............... 6.444 98.5 No cash rent .. ............................... 43 1.6 Fuel al, kerosene, etc ........................ - - Median ( dollars) .............................. 743 (X) Coal or coke .. ............................... - - Wood ..................... . . . . . ........... . . - - GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF Solar energy .. ............................... - - HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999 Other fuel .............................. ..... 4 0.1 Less than 15.0 percent ........................ 581 21.0 No fuel used .. ............................... 61 0.9 15.0 to 19.9 percent .......................... 499 18.0 20.0 to 24.9 percent .......................... 287 10.4 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS 25.0 to 29.9 percent .......................... 274 9.9 Lacking complete plumbing facilities ............ - - 30.0 to 34.9 percent .......................... 205 7.4 Lacking complete kitchen facilities .............. 17 0.3 35.0 percent or more ......................... 835 30.2 No telephone service ......................... 171 2.6 Not computed. ............................... 86 3.1 - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000. U.S. Census Bureau 3116 - Fact Sheet - American FactFinder http: / /factfinder. census. gov /servlet/SAFFFacts ?_event= Search &geo_ .. Social Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. Zip Code Tabulation Area 34116 15,294 High school graduate or higher View a Fad Sheet for a race, ethnic, or ancestry group Census 2000 Demographic Profile Highlights: 80.4% map brief Bachelor's degree or higher 2,069 General Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. Ciyti W-v,glgram(civilian population 18 years and 1,780 Total population 25,170 map brief map brief Male 13,149 52.2 49.1% map brief Female 12,021 47.8 50.9% map brief MWjao-agg (years) 30.8 (X) 35.3 map brief Under 5 years 2,048 8.1 6.8% map 18 years and over 17,863 71.0 74.3% Female, Now married, except separated (population 4,888 65 years and over 1,835 7.3 12.4% map brief One race 24,211 96.2 97.6% Speak a language other than English at home 8,840 White 20,063 79.7 75.1% map brief Black or African American 2,239 8.9 12.3% map brief American Indian and Alaska Native 88 0.3 0.9% map brief Asian 207 0.8 3.6% map brief Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 27 0.1 0.1% map brief Some other race 1,587 6.3 5.5% map 43,805 Two or more races 959 3.8 2.4% map brief Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 8,164 32.4 12.5% map brief Household population 25,119 99.8 97.2% map brief Group quarters population 51 0.2 2.8% map Average bQUSebnlli size 3.09 (X) 2.59 map brief Average family size 3.36 (X) 3.14 map Total housing units 8,818 map Occupied housing units 8,137 92.3 91.0% brief Owner - occupied housing units 4,972 61.1 66.2% map Renter - occupied housing units 3,165 38.9 33.8% map brief Vacant housing units 681 7.7 9.0% map Social Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. Population 25 years and over 15,294 High school graduate or higher 10,998 71.9 80.4% map brief Bachelor's degree or higher 2,069 13.5 24.4% map Ciyti W-v,glgram(civilian population 18 years and 1,780 10.0 12.7% map brief over) Disability status (population 5 years and over) 5,898 25.5 19.3% map brief Foreign born 7,418 29.5 11.1% map brief Male, Now married, except separated (population 15 5,170 51.9 56.7% brief years and over) Female, Now married, except separated (population 4,888 54.0 52.1% brief 15 years and over) Speak a language other than English at home 8,840 38.2 17.9% map brief (population 5 years and over) Economic Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent U.S. In labor force (population 16 years and over) 12,922 69.2 63.9% brief Mean travel time to work in minutes (workers 16 23.2 (X) 25.5 map brief years and older) Median household imoaw in 1999 (dollars) 43,805 (X) 41,994 map Median family income in 1999 (dollars) 43,240 (X) 50,046 map Per capita income in 1999 (dollars) 17,756 (X) 21,587 map Families below poverty level 595 9.7 9.2% map brief f 2 7/25/06 11:20 PM 4116 - Fact Sheet - American FactFinder Individuals below poverty level http: / /factfi nder. census .gov /serv]eUSAFFFacts ?_event= Search &geo_ 3,118 12.5 12.4% map Housing Characteristics - show more >> Number Percent -- Single- family owner - occupied homes 4,189 Median value (dollars) 104,000 (X) Median of selected monthly owner costs (X) (X) With a 01oag= (dollars) 944 (X) Not mortgaged (dollars) 289 (X) (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3) U.S. brief 119,600 map brief brief 1,088 map 295 ' of 2 7/25/06 11:20 PM Colonnades At Santa Barbara Market - Conditions Study Page IV -1 Mulor-1-3U1 AWO a a 14,11113Ik"IE ey 1. The findings of this market - conditions study demonstrate clearly that it is in the interest of those living within the Primary Trade Area, as defined in Section I, that a convenience center be developed on available acreage within and adjacent to the present site of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development. 2. The Colonnades' site located on Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Bar- bara Boulevard can provide easily expanded convenience shopping opportu- nities for the traveling public. 3. The study further contends that in instances where conventional C -3 and C -4 zoning is permitted within already developed shopping centers within or adjacent to the Primary Trade Area (PTA), it may be appropriate to permit a limited array of C -4 uses outside existing centers that provide op- portunities for certain desired convenience services serving neighboring resi- dential communities and travelers. 4. Expansion of commercialdevelopment to provide needed goods and services to residents of the PTA will likely be driven by the spacing require- ments of supermarket and drug store chains; the impact of other surround- ing commercial and residential development; and the future but unan- nounced plans of land owners to develop parcels now earmarked, but cur- rently undeveloped, for commercial uses. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. A transitional -area, commercial -use project to accommodate uses pro- vided for in the C -3 and C -4 zoning districts in the Land Development Code (LDC) should be given first consideration when planning for the subject site. 2. The future plans of retail establishments within reasonable proximity of the Colonnades At Santa Barbara should be evaluated to determine if a portion of the site could be developed in a manner to accommodate the re- location plans of convenience and drug store outlets that would be well served by a highly - visible, free - standing facility at a high - traffic location like the subject site. 3. The subject site also recommends itself as an appropriate site for an array of Conditional Uses. 4. A plan should be developed that will, at a minimum, anticipate the response(s) of those living in adjacent neighborhoods to proposed commer- cial development on the subject site, and address neighborhood concerns likely to be expressed at public hearings held to consider a future zoning ap- plication. EMIT V. E.I flU LIC FACILITIES LE XLL O SERVICE ANALYSIS - EXHIBIT V.E. PUBLIC FACILTTIES LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The subject Growth Management Plan Amendment proposes to permit a maximum of 115,000 square feet of commercial development and up to 15 units per acre of residential development on the 18+ acre property that comprises this portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict land use category. It is expected that this project will commence development by 2008 with anticipated buildout in 2010. Potable Water: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Potable Water established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this area is provided by Collier County Water and Sewer District. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Potable Water are as follows: Potable Water _ LOS Standard 185 GPD /Capita Available Inventory as of FY2005 41.0 MGD Required Inventory as of FY2010 52.3 MGD Planned CIE FY 06 -10 32.7 MGD 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 21.4 MGD Minimum standards for Potable Water are being met or exceeded. It is estimated that potable water demand for the project will be as follows. 65,000 sq.ft. retail at: 0.1 GPD /SF = 6,500 GPD 50,000 sq.ft. medical office at: 0.15 GPD /SF = 7,500 GPD 75 DU multi- family residential at: 200 GPD/DU = 15,000 GPD The total combined demand for potable water for the new land use category is approximately 29,000 gallons per day. Based on the available inventory identified in the 2005 AUK this demand will not have a significant impact on the Collier County Regional Water System. TANNING DOGS MEKOS GMPA (GGMPA)WPP1JCATI0N\L0SD0C.dx GGMPA Sanitary Sewer: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Sanitary Sewer are as follows: Sanitary Sewer LOS Standard 145 GPD /Capita Available Inventory as of FY2005 24.1 MGD Required Inventory as of FY2010 23.0 MGD Planned CIE FY 06 -10 6.5 MGD 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 7.6 MGD Standards for Sanitary Sewer are being met or exceeded. It is estimated that wastewater demand for the project will be equal to that identified in the potable water analysis above and is approximately 29,000 gallons per day. This demand is within the available capacity identified in the AUIR, will not have a significant impact on the Regional Wastewater System. Arterial and Collector Roads: Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Drainage established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Drainage are as follows: Drainage LOS Standard Future Development (subsequent to January 1989) — 25 year, 3 day storm Existing Development (prior to January 1989) — current service level Available Inventory as of 10/11/05 311 Canal Miles Required Inventory as of FY2010 347 Canal Miles Planned CIE FY 06 -10 $76,959,750 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) N/A F:\PROJ - PLANNING ROCS \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA)\APPL[CA170NV0SD0C.dm GGMPA The proposed development in the amendment area will be designed to comply with the 25 year, 3 day storm routing requirements. Solid Waste: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary with standards for Solid Waste established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Solid Waste are as follows: Solid Waste LOS Standard Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at average disposalrate/previous 5 years Available Inventory as of FY2005 3,861,672 Site Tons Required Inventory as of FY2010 779,099 Site Tons Planned CIE FY 06 -10 794,814 Site Tons 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 3,877,387 Site Tons No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities are anticipated from this 18- acre commercial project. Parks: Community and Regional The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and hnventory Report (AUIR) for Parks are as follows: Parks LOS Standard 2.9414 acres /1000 population Available Inventory as of 9/30/05 993.9 Acres Required Inventory as of FY2010 1,325.5 Acres Planned CIE FY 06 -10 837.7 Acres 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 457.1 Acres No adverse impacts to the existing parks are anticipated from this 18 -acre commercial project. F:\PRO] - PLANNING DOCS\GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA)UPPLICATIONV..OSDOC.dm GGMPA Emergency Medical Services The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for EMS are as follows: Emergency Medical Services LOS Standard 1 Unit/15,( Available Inventory as of 9/30/05 Required Inventory as of FY2010 Planned CIE FY 06 -10 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 100 population 21.5 Units 30.6 Units 9 Units (0.1) Units No adverse impacts to the existing emergency medical services are anticipated from this 18 -acre commercial project. Schools The 75 proposed residential units for the project are not expected to have a major impact on level of service for school facilities. There is a new elementary school proposed for opening in 2007 near the project site in south Golden Gate City. Fire Control The proposed project lies within the East Naples Fire District. There are two existing fire station within 3.5 miles of the project site. In addition, Golden Gate Fire District has a station that is less than 1 mile from the project site. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. FAPROJ - PLANNING DOCS\GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA)WPPLJCATIONVASDOC.dw GGMPA , EXHIBIT V.E.le T RAFRC MCT! STATE M- T TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT EXHIBIT V.E.1c Prepared for: Colonnade on Santa Barbara, LLC 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 16 Naples, FL 34103 Prepared by: Q. GRADY NUNOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ PLANNERS 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 (239) 947 -1144 APRIL 2005 C. Dean Smith, P.E. FL 44147 F- JOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA) \TIS \GGMPATIS -DOC GGMPA Table of Contents Tableof Contents .................................................................................................... ............................... i Listof Figures and Tables ..................................................................................... ............................... i INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. ............................... l SCOPE.................................................................................................................... ..............................1 TRIPGENERATION ........................................................................................... ............................... 1 TRIPASSIGNMENT ............................................................................................ ............................... 5 EXISTINGTRAFFIC ........................................................................................... ............................... 5 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................ ............................... 5 APPENDIX A, SUPPORTING DATA ........................................... ............................A -1 THRU A -5 List of Figures and Tables FIGURE1 .............................................................................................................. ............................... 2 TABLEI ................................................................................................................ ............................... 3 TABLE2 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 3 TABLE3 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 4 TABLE4 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 4 TABLE5 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 6 TABLE6 ................................................................................................................. ..............................7 TABLE7 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 8 TABLE8 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 8 Page 1 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT INTRODUCTION The proposed Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict is an 18f acre parcel located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The subdistrict proposes a maximum of 115,000 square feet of intermediate commercial and office development, or residential development up to 15 units per acre. This district was previously 6.83 acres in size and permitted a maximum of 35,000 square feet of intermediate commercial and office development. For project location please refer to Figure 1, Location Map, page 2. The parcel is currently accessed from Golden Gate Parkway and may be access from Santa Barbara Boulevard in the future. SCOPE The following analyses are included in this report: 1. Trip Generation Calculations (at buildout) presented for Peak Season Daily Traffic (PSDT) including the respective peak hour volumes. 2. Trip Assignment within the Radius of Development Influence (RDI). 3. Existing Traffic Volumes within the RDI; AADT volumes, PSDT volumes, and Level of Service (LOS). 4. Discussion of impacts to roadways within the RDI. TRIP GENERATION The 7th Edition Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is used for trip generation calculations provided in this report. Please refer to Tables 1 through 4 on pages 3 and 4. The trip generation for the proposed use is estimated to be 6,424 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 585 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). The trip generation for the existing use is estimated to be 1,155 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 113 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). This results in a net trip generation for the proposed growth management plan amendment of 5,269 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 472 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). Please refer to the DISCUSSION section for details concerning the effects of these traffic volumes on the level of service for roadway links within the RDI. F:VOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA) \TIS \GGMPATIS.DOC GGMPA FIGURE I LOCATION MAP NTS. I tl R3i +j� i . • R � � i 78 g s 3ua. o � s4 p 55ggg � t gg e� P d � N" a c $ � �= R' +gig •; s $5 • $ tE EE gGgG r�wP'3 f 8 R� 9e Al pi 2 y i ® eSd� �. � s � € � e €i s Fe + 9R .v •p�`g ii �i � �= + k�� rW !� � 61 so �..... N s� • + � ; o a� p pp�y-y na ow 'z z MEXICO GULF OF LOCATION MAP NTS. Page 3 Table 1 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION PROPOSED USES Lr US ITS;L D DU ( E Mp . USA CDbE SQ.F�. 1 MEDICAL 720 50 T.G.L.A. Ln(T) =.93 Ln(X) + 1.47 165 OFFICE 720 35 T.G.L.A. Ln(T) =.93 Ln(X) + 1.47 119 SHOPPING 820 65 T.G.L.A. Ln(T) =.66 Ln(X) + 3.4 471 CENTER RESIDENTIAL 230 270 DU Ln(T) =.82 Ln(X) +.32 136 CONDOMINIUM EXISTING PERMITTED USES NIET TnTAI. PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION a . r Mp 1 MEDICAL 720 35 T.G.L.A. Ln(T) =.93 Ln(X) + 1.47 119 OFFICE NIET TnTAI. PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Table 2 ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR PROPOSED ENTER/ EXl'1 13REAKLII W IN V IKirb LUKIIN 1y rlvi rEAn "U uK EXISTING ENTER/EXIT OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR VET ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUN g 1] I 2 3Q I }� �°• '4. TOTAL 653 50.5 %/49.5% 330/323 a TOTAL TRIPS N/A N/A N/A 653 Table 2 ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR PROPOSED ENTER/ EXl'1 13REAKLII W IN V IKirb LUKIIN 1y rlvi rEAn "U uK EXISTING ENTER/EXIT OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR VET ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUN g 1] I 2 3Q I }� �°• '4. TOTAL 653 50.5 %/49.5% 330/323 Page 4 Table 3 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR EXIE"AL rKUJhUI 1KIrb PYic'rINC PNI PFAK unITR FYTFRNAT. PRIIJF.CT TRIPS it X AS2 I� .. s t, mo P MEDICAL OFFICE 165 5% 157 SHOPPING CENTER 471 5% 447 RESIDENTIAL 136 5% 129 CONDOMINIUM PYic'rINC PNI PFAK unITR FYTFRNAT. PRIIJF.CT TRIPS it X AS2 t, mo g4 t,. Epr 3 MEDICAL OFFICE 113 U 0% 113 MEDICAL OFFICE 119 5% 113 NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS c �" hwa' i .3: . -'fir:' TOTAL 653 5% 620 Table 4 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON -PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS PROPOSED PM PEAK t1U U K LAI SKIN AL iwiN -rA�a D 1 rKgJJ M_ 1 I kUr3 Pvlcmnvd-_ PwI PF Au UnITR FYTFRNAI. NnN -PASO RV PROJECT TRIPS NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON -PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS ® e 6 me, ��' AS2 t,. Epr 3 MEDICAL OFFICE 113 U 0% 113 NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON -PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS ® e 6 me, ��' Page 5 TRIP ASSIGNMENT The projected directional distribution of traffic to and from Golden Gate Estates Commercial Inftll Subdistrict site was determined using population and surrounding trip attractions. A modified Fratar method calculation was used based on population projections for the area and proportional distribution of existing traffic. The project directional distribution is shown on Table 5, page 6. Table 6, on page 7, provides details regarding the significance test for impacts to road segments on the surrounding roadway network. No roadway segments meet the significance test, therefore only the accessed roadway segments will be included in the balance of the analysis in this report. EXISTING TRAFFIC Table 7, page 8, shows existing AADT traffic volumes, including peak hour volumes for the roadway links accessed by the project. The values were taken from the 2004 traffic counts published in the Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). The traffic count data is presented in Appendix A, Supporting Data. Level of Service (LOS) determinations are made based on Peak Hour, Peak Direction Service Volumes presented in the AUfR. Table 8, page 8, shows peak hour traffic volumes including project traffic. DISCUSSION The impact of project traffic volumes on the roadway network surrounding the prof ect is not significant. The volume of proposed project traffic does not degrade the level of service ofany ofthe roadway links within the project RDI below acceptable standards. All segments will operate at LOS Standard or better. All segments will also have excess peak hour capacity greater than the projected trip generation for the subject property. F:VOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA) \TIS \GGMPATIS.DOC GGMPA Page 6 Table 5 PROJECT DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ROADWAY LINK FROM TO % OF PROJECT VOLUME Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette -Frank Road Airport Road 5% Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road I -75 25% Golden Gate Parkway I -75 Santa Barbara Blvd. 40% Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Blvd. Collier Boulevard 20% Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 20% Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 20% Radio Road Davis Boulevard 10% Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 10% Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. Pine Ridge Road 5% Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Blvd. Collier Boulevard 10% Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 10% Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 10% Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Blvd. Green Boulevard 5% Green Boulevard I -75 10% Pine Ridge Road I -75 Logan Boulevard 5% F:UOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA) \TIS \GGMPATIS.DOC GGMPA rr F� r� d � � H w � G Q H z F z Q Q �IaININI boob ma �m v ° o .° r -0 U � N U O � O w O > p b d W d �IN(�7IN c, t' X 0 0 m �p rn o 0 N m. gym. t i N�7� r � b❑ � b❑ 'pp .� b❑ b❑ ^F 0 0 O O O O r p zsn rn W r°z z � , T l to m b W P4 N ° p Qa � y0 p b O N ,y o y mN > N a .-K AN F, M'g t „� > Y�' 0 0 > > 0 M P4 P4. w ❑ C 7 y v 7 ro y m o a a u U P a b+ yO FI L CC :i G d rA i7 a U U Y`v 7 � U m a o � w O Vi b U A. U o a G O � U by � � � d �y J � o z ww rl n Page 8 Table 7 ROADWAY LINK PEAK HOUR LOS — EXISTING ROADWAY LINK FROM TO AADT PEAK HOUR PEAK DIR. LOS Golden Gate Pkwy. I -75 Santa Barb. Blvd. 49,286 2,070 C Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Blvd. G.G. Parkway 3 2,3 81 1,360 D Table 8 ROADWAY LINK PEAK HOUR LOS — WITH PROJECT ROADWAY LINK FROM TO AADT PEAK HOUR PEAK DIR. LOS Golden Gate Pkwy. I -75 Santa Barb. Blvd. 51,548 2,165 C Santa Barbara Blvd. Green Blvd. G.G. Parkway 33,524 1,408 D F:UOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA)MS \GGMPATIS.DOC GGMPA APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DATA A -I F:UOB \GREKOS GMPA (GGMPA) \TIS \GGMPATISDOC GGMPA S a 5 V $ } i 4 �O `s xEs' F�6t I 1 p S g ` Z F em i y V i � � G m 8 _ Z W N o ax 6V Z F � 8 9 fi 61 6 F4. Yml rSr V > > O _ =Ym r r & R 8 8$ q w o 00o w o 0 0 o w o 0 0 ° o is s $ g s s 3 / \ - ,,,! \|! }r\! \!; §!!._ - ,•!!.,!!! \__ ___ a 8 s Ly } N w . O 6=C 2m" 6 x � i �7 �w da y y r r uV S`3G F w00 Omum Q 6 6 V V U 6 V V V O m E : >y q 95 m m b m m o 000 o m mom owmwm w V � � u � � Em o o $s Z Z Z V O A u - x g V } NC V ze. i L'aa p p O U p p O p p p V p< U V 6 � o 0 o w w p o owpw p o p m 2 [ d 5 r g 5 9 � - a V _ a� E E i d 6z y y y i d MOEN so OEM y y y i d EXHIBIT 'VG PRODF Of QWNERSHfP Details COLONNADE ON Current arty Addres A LLC Page 1 of 1 I Cityll NAPLES II Statell FL il ZipII 34103 - 0000 j Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 TR 112 OR 683 PG 173 Acres 29 11 49 1 26 II 6.83 II 4829 11 335500 112 04829 I Sub No. 335500 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 "` Merge Area I ffiwae l -4" Use Code VACANT RESIDENTIAL 10 13.3115 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History Land Value $ 307,350.00 Date Book - Page Amount (+ Improved Value $ 0.00 0212005 3737-1166 $ 0.00 ( =) Market Value $ 307,350.00 33 09l 2003 92 -4 $ 1,010,000.00 ( -j SOH Exempt Value ( =) Assessed Value $ 307,350.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Taxable Value $ 307,350.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes' exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. http:// www. collierappraiser .coiyvRecordDetail.asp ?FoliolD = 0000038170000009 4/8/2005 O This instrument was prepared without legal opinion by and, after — recording, should be returned to: Goodman Breen & Gibbs 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 239 -403 -3000 QUIT CLAIM DEED 3561840 OR: 3131 PG: 1166 HCOIDID in OPPICIAL "COBS of COLLIII COOITP, it 02/18/2005 at 12:59P1 DWIGHT 8. HIM, CL111 HIC 111 18.50 DOC -,70 .70 1etn: C40DKU Bu1W IT Al 3838 TAWIUI TB W 1300 WAPLIS PL 34103 THIS INDENTURE, made this 2 10 day of February, 2005, between COLoNNADE MEDICAL PARK, LLC, a Florida limite rya ►[arty company, County of Lee, State of Florida, Grantor *, and COLONNADE ON SANTA BARBARA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 16, Naples, Florida 34103, Grantee *. WITNESSETH, That the Grantor or_�d in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS, and other good and vat b i e o said Grantor, in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hejorida, eby remise, in and quit -claim to the said Grantee, and Grantee' assigns forev 1 Ilowing described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Cou to -wit: Tract 112, Unit 30, Plat Book 7, Page i� thereof recorded in V, Florida. SUBJECT TO restricT reservations, and in n obi cord, and taxes for year 2005 and subsequent years. \ t Prior Instrument record �� ok 3392 y , Folio 38170000009. 1 TO HAVE AND TO He with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the Grantee forever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. *11 OR: 3131 PG: 1161 * ** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand the day and year first above written. signed and delivered u to both in our presence: fance F, Fox ��:� � %I�Ir7¢f�1if6+G <r. �ls�WsYJl1L�l iype or pant— � Of fVltness Jiro. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was GaEKos and ATI3JA L. KYRrms as company, on behalf of the limited lii driver's licenses as identification. i ZANNOS U. a ' a tom,„ WA � n -.„ who CIRI of February, 2005, by ZAmos G. LLC , a Florida limited liability known to me or O have produced Nowt' PAk• SIMof Fbft Division of Corporations Page I of 2 Florida Limited Liability COLONNADE ON SANTA BARBARA, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE 16 NAPLES FL 34103 MAILING ADDRESS 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE 16 NAPLES FL 34103 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed L04000005808 NONE 01/21/2004 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE 01/21/2004 Total Contribution 0.00 Reizistered Aaent Name & Address KYRITSIS, ATHINA L 207 MERMAIDS BIGHT NAPLES FL 34103 Manap-er /Member Detail Annual Reports htti)://ccfcorl).dos.state.fl.us/scrii)ts/cordet.exe?aI =D ETFIL &n ]= L04000005808 &n2= NAMFWD &n3 =0... 4/8/2005 Name & Address Title KYRITSIS, ATHINA L 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH MGRM NAPLES FL 34103 GREKOS, G 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH MGRM FL 3410 NAPLES FL 34103 Annual Reports htti)://ccfcorl).dos.state.fl.us/scrii)ts/cordet.exe?aI =D ETFIL &n ]= L04000005808 &n2= NAMFWD &n3 =0... 4/8/2005 Division of Corporations Page 2 of 2 11 Report Year 11 Filed Date 11 No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT httrr / /mfrnm dnq ante fl nskrrinis /rorrlrt exe`> n1= DFTFII. kni— vn40000(15RnRkn ?= N ANA FWnlRnl3 O d /R /'Jf1f15 Electronic Articles of Organization For Florida Limited Liability Company Article I The name of the Limited Liability Company is: COLONNADE ON SANTA BARBARA, LLC L04000005808 FILED 8:00 AM January 21 2004 Sec. Of Stale Article II The street address of the principal office of the Limited Liability Company is: 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE 16 NAPLES, FL. 34103 The mailing address of the Limited Liability Company is: 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE 16 NAPLES, FL. 34103 Article III The purpose for which this Limited Liability Company is organized is: ANY AND ALL LAWFUL, BUSINESS. Article IV The name and Florida street address of the registered agent is: ATHINA L KYRITSIS 207 MERMAIDS BIGHT NAPLES, FL. 34103 Having been named as registered agent and to accept service of process for the above stated limited liability company at the place designated in this certificate, I hereby accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity. I further agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relating to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent. Registered Agent Signature: ATHINA L. KYRITSIS Article V The name and address of managing members /managers are Title: MGRM ATHINA L KYRITSIS 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL. 34103 Title: MGRM ZANNOS G GREKOS 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL. 34103 Article VI The effective date for this Limited Liability Company shall be: 01/21/2004 Signature of member or an authorized representative of a member Signature: LESLIE A. LEHMANN L04000005808 FILED 8:00 AM January 21 2004 Sec. Of State Book 3392 - Page 4 Page 1 of 3255502 OR11 3392 PO,.`, 0001 RICOOR it Oman RBCjIRDR.of,tDliIBR COI�TY, PL: " 49105/2003 at `@9�.39AR D1It @`a .Bfih,'CiBBE , CDIaA F0F4000.b6 THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARS0 BY: Ric FBI 030 jame3b, vogr'L B5q. DDC•.70 7010.00 Fla. But Na 0051373EtD: Vopl`I,aw 00ce. P -A twtORIDA TITLI 98RVICRB Suite R, midww Titie:Rtdg. 2SC00 BPARItiH fiAbbS DLYO 3036 Tamian i Trail *forth BONITA . RRI1109 i5 39135 Naples. Florida 34103 ' ... (239) 262-2211 PREP&RAT[0N, ONLY WITHOUTOPINEO?v 1i" RR— AN'iTY DEED THIS WARRANTY D E15 made Lire .day o€ 2403, by1hiri�on LeadagCbmpany, an Ohio carpora lrbn,,hereirlafter�all�dthe RAbIiY112 , #oG�llaisausdeNl�d�ra1 Park, I:., a ]?laride latnited liability tnpan�, hereinatier c1d#heFTLE,,'= t1'hdse post G office address is `I r? c c 6 n f llA. tytCti bi� JI, t °, Maples l{lorida,. (Wherever used herein the term "grantor" and "grantee" fhelude ll;tize parties to thtsxnstrument attd the'heirs, legal representatives and assigns of the individuals, and tlac successors and assamns of ii Ci7Ipal`iltlC)i14 }, W"ITNBSSETH. That the grantor, for and in coi sideaatio 3 ofihc'swn of $10.0 0 and=atlzcr valt>able.considerations, .receipt wht�reaf is lioreby aeknciwled�ed, lt�reby gents, basins, sells, ali6n9,`,remises, releases, conveys and eanfi as 4MIto the'gearltee..all That oert a 1 Yti srtuaia ire' Cbllier Cqttniy, orida, vfa.� `Tract 112; Unit 30; Golden Gate Estates; saccordingAP t1le at thereof` recorded in " Plat Book T, °gage 58, of the Public Records of 4o11 Cdiinity, i for da Praperty::1.D,: 381' 000000'9 T t}G'THFii with all the teiremdnts, Iereditaaneatts and appurtcnanes thereto belonging or in' anywitie appertaining, j TO 11fTAVl .t4NI) Hti1 t7 tlie'same,?ti fee simple forayer. AND egrantorherebyoovenants withsaa flgraateethatthegra Worisfawflllyseczedbfstid land-in fee simple; that the 'grantor bas good right and lawftal authority to soli nd cvcy said'la �3; ct thatthegrafttorherebyfuilyw ,"t ithelitletosaidrantandwilP3efendt €tesameagainstthei wf { clitims a €all perscins vrbon3soeveT and ilikt sad ]end's free o€'sil esacaut?braaaces;'except taxes. j - accruing subsequent tai Aecetnber 3;1, 402; zatting,�uildmg,cede and,other restrictions vnpased - � by 8ylveammental aeatiioriiy; o�atstandamg oat;,:gaa end minei�l nterest�,pi' record; r£ any; and - restrictions. and'easements afrecard- ` . Division of Corporations Page I of Florida Limited Liability COLONNADE MEDICAL PARK, LLC Document Number LOIOOOO19130 State FL Total Contribution 0.00 PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N., SUITE 16 NAPLES FL 34103 Changed 10/08/2004 MAILING ADDRESS 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N., SUITE 16 NAPLES FL 34103 Changed 10/08/2004 FEI Number 593752902 Status ACTIVE Reizistered Agent Name & Address KYRITSIS, ATHINA 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. STE 16 NAPLES FL 34103 Name Changed: 03/16/2004 Address Chaneed: 03/162004 Manager /Member Detail Date Filed 10/22/2001 Effective Date NONE —Tl I` T0....1 —T A nnnnl 0 14n P —. —TT A AACISITI Q —I —nnn nnQ /'ln! Name & Address Title KYRITSIS, BIG L 207 MERMAIDS BIGHT 07 MERMAIDS IDS MGR NAPLES FL 34103 GREKOS, ZANNOS G 207 MERMAIDS BIGHT MGRM NAPLES FL 34103 —Tl I` T0....1 —T A nnnnl 0 14n P —. —TT A AACISITI Q —I —nnn nnQ /'ln! Division of Corporations Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2003 05/09/2003 2004 03/16/2004 2005 04/I1Y2005 F '�k "R`H1llx�'Y' t'Yt YNtM'# W I Ia iM 9+ifi No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 04/11/2005 -- ANN REP /UNIFO7777 REP 03/16/2004 -- ANN REP /UNIFOREP 05/09/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 08/01/2002--C R - ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 10/22/2001 -- Florida Limited Liabilites Page 2 of n _ 1T o._ 1— Tnln n001411r1R...'7= NTANAPNT7rlR,nI =000 AAPON 2005 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT FILED Apr 11, 2005 8:00 air. Secretary of State DOCUMENT # L01000018130 V 04- 11- 200590105001 * **150.00 1. Entity Name COLONNADE MEDICAL PARK, LLC 30903274 Principal Place of Business Mailing Address 2950 TAMIANU TRAIL N., SUITE 16 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N., SUITE 16 NAPLES,FL 34103 NAPLES, FL 34103 ppp 1 V III I INIIII II III II�IIIIIIIIIIII III III��IIIIIIVIIII 04012005 No Chg -LLC CR2E083 (10103) DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 4. FEI Number Applied FOr r I Applicable 59- 3752902 5. Certificate of Status Desired ❑ $5.00 Additional Fee Required S. Name and Address of Current Registered Agent DO NOT WRITE KYRITSIS,ATHINA 2950 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. STE 16 NAPLES, FL 34103 IN THIS SPACE 8. The above named entity Submits; this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent. a both, in the State of Florida. I am familiar with, and accept the obligations of registered agent. SIGNATURE Jpuw.rypOd vEab nE^4arpsldOU eGVrIaC EtkaelxlraNe. INn1E WDbrdeC Aedy EenPVPrwvM+tdra,sddel DFtE Filing I" is 550.00 Due by May 1, 2005 g, MANAGING MEMBERS /MANAGERS TIM MGR NAME KYRITSIS, ATHINA L STREET ADDRESS 207 MERMAIDS BIGHT cm -sT -hp NAPLES, FL 34103 TITLE MGRM RAW GREKOS. ZANNOS G STREET ADDRESS 207 MERMAIDS BIGHT CITY-ST-01, NAPLES, FL 34103 TIRE WME STREET DO NOT WRITE clrr -st -aP - ST-VP� IN THIS SPACE TITLE - NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY -ST -M TITLE Neff STREET ADDRESS City. ST -ZIP TITLE NAA1E STREET ADDRESS CITY -ST -ZIP 11- I hereby cenily that the information Supplied with des not qualify for the exemption stated in Section 119.07(3)(1). Florida Statutes. I further certify that the information this report is true and accurate an re Shall have the same legal effect as if made under oalh; that I am a managing member or manager of me Ion limited liability company or the receiver or tru acute this report as required by Chapter 608, Florida Statutes. SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE AND TPED DA Pa E E OL SIGNING MANAGING 4EMBEP, OP ANiNDe2Ea PEOPESENisIIVE 0 re Dayvne PndV Details Page 1 of 1 Current Ownership Folio No. 38169960008 Map 11 Property Address 2925 SANTA BARBARA BLVD CIROU TR, LEON R TAD 2126195 DORIS L CIROU FAMILY TRUST 2925 SANTA BARBARA BLVD NAPLES Statell FL Zip 34116 -7429 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 S 15OFT OF TR 111 Section Township Range Acres j Map No. Strap No. 29 49 26 2.93 41329 —� 335500111141329 Sub No. 335500 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 �Millage Area I Millaae Use Code 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I 1-0_ IF 13.3115 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History Land Value $ 138,443.00 Date Book -Page Amount ( +) Improved Value $ 202,800.00 1012001 2908 - 523 $ 0.00 (_) Market Value _ $ 341,243.00 03 / 1995 2Q35 1723 $ 0.00 SOH Exempt Value (_) Assessed Value Homestead and other ( =) Taxable Value I = "Save Our Homes" ex due to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. http:// www. collierappraiser .corn/RecordDetail .asp ?FoliolD = 0000038169960008 4/4/2005 Book 2908 - Page 523 r i TRUSTEE'S DEED THIS TRUSTEE'S DEED, made on the 1.LA day of S&ja""T. 2001, between LEON R. CIROU, Successor Trustee of the DORIS L. CIROU TRUST AGREEMENT dated 2/26/95, with ftdl power and authority to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber, orotherwise to manage and dispose of the real property described herein, whose address is 2925 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34116, patty of the first part, Grantor, and LEON R. CIROU, Trustee of the DORIS L. CIROU FAMILY TRUST, created under the DORIS L. CIROU TRUST dated2/26l95, Grantee with full powtrand authority to protect, conserve, sell, leasc, encumber, or otherwise to manage and dispose of the real property described herein, whose address is 2925 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples. Florida 34116, party of the second part, Grants. WITNESSETH: wHEREAS, ownership in said real property, hereinafter described, passed to LEON R. CIROU, Successor Trustee of the DORIS L. CIROU TRUST AGREEMENT dated 2/26195, by Order Determining Homestead Status of Real Property entered July 23, 2001by the Circuit Court for Collier County, Florida, Probate Division, File No. 01- 1044- CP- 02 -14DH. Page 1 of httn / /www_ cot IieraDDraiser .coin/viewer /Image. asp? 4/18/20, 2871219 OR: 2908 PG: 0923 AHe91919 19 9RI91AL 1119111 of NUM 099144, IL 1411212001 it 97:34111 91121 1. 11011, tan Her" tS.01 than ra: A9e -.I0 .79 suit Edward E. Wotansn, Esq. bete: Wallops. Strauss & Associatrs. P.A. b9LWJ STUOU N U 5129 Castello Drive, Sake t Napies. Florida 34103 3$91 bbA141 by 1190 I7 ium sPAU95 AL 74434 run tmu«,a nos q: Esq.. wmr: EdwanS E. sees, &. Wo9man. P.A. & Auite Tres, 5129 Caxsllo ARive, Suite t 110 Dri Napla. Plorida 34103 —I.. X!'JtC :1i451AXE Pok MiMEU:N4 DATA -- - -^SVM] nBOYE TY5 WC i1131iFL� IXG pAtn TRUSTEE'S DEED THIS TRUSTEE'S DEED, made on the 1.LA day of S&ja""T. 2001, between LEON R. CIROU, Successor Trustee of the DORIS L. CIROU TRUST AGREEMENT dated 2/26/95, with ftdl power and authority to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber, orotherwise to manage and dispose of the real property described herein, whose address is 2925 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34116, patty of the first part, Grantor, and LEON R. CIROU, Trustee of the DORIS L. CIROU FAMILY TRUST, created under the DORIS L. CIROU TRUST dated2/26l95, Grantee with full powtrand authority to protect, conserve, sell, leasc, encumber, or otherwise to manage and dispose of the real property described herein, whose address is 2925 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples. Florida 34116, party of the second part, Grants. WITNESSETH: wHEREAS, ownership in said real property, hereinafter described, passed to LEON R. CIROU, Successor Trustee of the DORIS L. CIROU TRUST AGREEMENT dated 2/26195, by Order Determining Homestead Status of Real Property entered July 23, 2001by the Circuit Court for Collier County, Florida, Probate Division, File No. 01- 1044- CP- 02 -14DH. Page 1 of httn / /www_ cot IieraDDraiser .coin/viewer /Image. asp? 4/18/20, Details Current Ownershil Folio No. 38169920006 Map 11 Property AddressIl 2915 SANTA Owner Name CIROU STEVEN W =& TALITHA C E Addressedi 2915 SANTA BARBARA BLVD City NAPLES 11 State FL Legal GOLDEN GATE ES7 UNIT 30 N 160FT OF TR 111 Page 1 of 1 Section Township Range 11 Acres J1 Map No. j Strap No. 29 49 26 J1 3.52 4629 335500 111 04B29 Sub No. 335500 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 " ! Millage Area "' Mill ge Ila '1 Use Code i SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL �10 �13.3115 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History Land Value $ 158,400.00 Date Book - Page Amount ( +) Improved Value $ 265,705.00 $ 424,105.00 1212000 2757 -3441 $ 50,000.00 0911995 2035 - 1721 IF — (_) Market Value ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value $ 424,105.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Valu,:]l $ 25,000.00 _) Taxable Value 11 $ 399,105.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes' exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. http: // www. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetai 1. asp ?Folio I D= 000003 8169920006 4/4/2005 Book 2757 - Page 3441 im tl w. ftud WOMM E4 RMbm lO y & AnodallsY P.A. Nqk% P10ei1!R 34103.1%3 shtr aor Prr�reily: phaw 8damd & W mrol 24. WaRmW S ms & AMMUM P.A. 3129 i*dit 1 WIM Sine I Kwo. Pladb 34103 -19M Page 1 of p �r {' 'i �" i�31 13f ft b � ■EI■t It � mtr a m go." MM A i 1..0 oft � 4 1111 1 u t1 A a :.Ef t' �. +t. II= A Y`1' li A. , l.:'y`. $1 !it♦ +MI r �i r3 Y el i tl c YIYC.n� i -+ 1� p R' ! Lr ♦s �-'-. el;t it }x ws Y. I Nl w•a!Y'Ir a F91 "" .i tlY9 Y' 9n f of # l 3- .A'n� .+ -L iwX Pw ✓1f M.ov r.. �i 'ln..r 1" 77 ,y ..y a l YiAf R1 lr. a i ,a _! 11 ! S: far: A ''� �' ✓5111 Jk,' fl q Ra:�t kr- i_.Y ! n 91 B'..' Y. �� , . � ..�. ,�, : ! !: • ►, 4 i'�. _ � . it � F. ♦.. ta,l ,. ryM %I A.VV AMn "l(I T-TnT n tho tlarae. ;m Amp Q; mile ff1YM" Details GATE PKWY 1=6MIIJI16111 Current Ownership ertv Addressil 5731 GOLDEN Page 1 of I 34116-7460 Section Township Range Acres Map No. Strap No. 29 49 28 2.34 4B29 335500 98 14B29 Sub No. 335500 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 . Mdlaae Use Code 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 10 ji 13.3115 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History = Assessed Value - Homestead and oth (= ) Taxable Value SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment The Information is Updated Weekly. A in i)nn< Land Value $ 104,423.00 Date Book - Page Amount —, +) Improved Value $ 98,549.00 0212000 r 2839 _,U $115,000.00 = Assessed Value - Homestead and oth (= ) Taxable Value SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment The Information is Updated Weekly. A in i)nn< Book 2639 - Page 65 - Prepared by and return tot 4411• Nasser TROPICAL TITLE Insurance Agency, Inc. 660 6th Street North. Suite 3 Naples, FL 34102 OOIP7760 TAX IO NO. 30168640006 2590022 02: 2639 PG: 0065 nom to attau ncm of calm em, It 0111/2011 at WSW MOO 1. Ina, cult 070 11f0N.11 Be 111 10.50 000-111 105.00 "to: Tl IM T1T11 93 AMM I1C na n WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED Node the 41H- day of FEBRUARY A.D. 2000 by DIANNA LEE FASO A SINGLE PERSON whose postaffiee address Is 3641 150 Avenue SW. Naples, Florida 34117 -6139, hereinafter Called the grantor, to BEVERLY J. GATTI A SINGLE PERSON whose posteffice address is 6731. Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida 34116, hereinafter called the grantee; WITNESSETB; That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sue of ten and 001100 (110.00) Dollars and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases. conveys and confires unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, vies The West ISO feet of Tract 98, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, KNIT NO. 30. according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7 Page 58, of the Public Records of Collier County. Florida TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditamonts and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in FEE SIMPLE AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seised of said load Io fee sinplel that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to sold land and Will defend the state against the lawful Claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all eacumbrances, except taxes - accruing subsequent to December 31, 1505. 19 WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. n Signed, sealed and delivered in our presences / Witness 91 " DIANNA LEE FASO Page 1 of Details Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 E 18OFT OF TR 98 OR 1408 PG 1205 Nv +tr Se.lrch Page 1 of 1 1460 Section Township Range Acres Map No. Strap No. 29 49 2 11 2.81 11 4829 J1 335500 98 04B29 Sub No. 335500 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 `'� Millagg Araa NWlstgf SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 10 13.3115 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History Land Value $ 125,396.00 Date Book - Page Amount (+ Improved Value $ 115,007.00 01/1989 1408-1205 $ 0.00 = Market Value $ 240,403.00 Q SOH Exempt Value $ 115,792.00 = Assessed Value $ 124,611.00 - Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 25,000.00 _) Taxable Value $ 99,611.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. Book 1408 - Page 1205 � c000tdasatioot a 1=00 01237961 X88 KC 19 AN 8 20 � gol '12 lam[ File 9r: 9303 COLLIER COUNTY RECQRQEO } �'CY }a Y7at7altt,Y Deed Made end executed the 13th day of Decomber AM. 1888 by $=; a, Sng. ��p4 8aaartat Rvno ., tu• a owipti ailon exinirr8 ruler the tewe of Florida sod having itt prMtlpat pia" of business at 5715 Ooldaa Gate Parlaway, Maples, Florida 33994 v hereinafter tall the 8ranw. to " Mervin 1. Smith said Iva M. smith, ausbcad and Vife w1 we poxtatrce address is 5715 Golden Gate Parkway, Maples, Florida 33499 Imminufter rail the prmttee: Witaessetbt That the greater. for and inconsideration of the samofpplg.00 atdothervahwbir , ronsidentions. naaipt whfft d to hereby uelmam4dpert by these prrmints d as grunt, hoopla, sell. anon, remise. trkose, trump and eonfbm unto the gunge, an that "min had situate in Collier .. •_^ County. Flaidn, eftx tkdt 30 The Fact 180 feet of Tract 98, OULDES GM 68117112,Aamcordiu8 to the Plot tz • thereof as conceded in Plat book 1, Page 50, of the Public Records of pol Coilior County, Florida. AAi INA J0 I / 01UA 44905 00120 R COUNTY CORDEtI r1 ✓ OR r, „K PAGE Received $ (? /ttrttentary Stamp tax a 0 Received S 4 JAMS' Class "C BNarayTa �Pa ay Tax ikR1 CO O.C. Tage6er with as the tememeetn, here mtwms and econeae th brtotig6ag m' In anywise appertsibbs;, ” To Have and to Hall, the satin is fee simple forever. as Acid tht greater hereby covenants with and granters that it is lawfaily asked of said lend in tea simple F that it has good right and tawhd mothuity, to ad and ecowey said lash that It hereby Adly warrants thedth to " Mid hand and wig Jefend the came against the heard elobns of ON peanns whcwmver; end that said lets) is free from sil ecrombnons except taxes seeaing subsequent to Denutbor 31. 19 t 87. a subject eaeesmatt, restrictions and reservations of raoord. tit ,jte4 a T° ca Brut i a gtk L ✓ ` inomvapol V-str In Witness Whereof the ginasor has emmed there preaenia to be executed In its come, and Us raaante sold to be benuato e0hed, by its proper asnoms theycatgo dub tuthadeed. the do and year Cost above written. a s Saturant Monaco, luc. ` � ATTEST :.............. .................... .............. ............................... tYiTNF$5: " D 4 STATE OF FLORIDA s� `OVNTY OF CAfJ.w The fereO t faarrnmem was ocynowledged boron me this 13th day of pytgthel. .190 by Robert V. $tact, Vicar-hVisiidaak of Seac nest ftrsge, Tt�o k a FlOttd'a mrpa a ioM1 oar hehaR of the cooperation Page 1 of Prepared without examination or opinion of title by and RETURN TO: Kim Charles Hornbach, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 0510696 5455 Jaeger Road, Suite B Naples, Florida 34109 -5805 (239) 592 -9828 3688079 OR: 3878 PG: 0332 noun is oRICIAI !!cods of Co16I11 e00R9, IL 0012912005 at 12:53II HIM 1. Iva, Cull IIC M 18.50 Beta: III CMIS BGIIIACI ISQ 5155 JUGII a Is IAPLIS IL 31109 5805 AFFIDAVIT OF CONTINUOUS MARRIAGE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, the ui ( "Afftant" herein), who, after I have personal 2. I, MARVIN E. SMI' described property located i Golden Gate Parkway, Nap all matters recited in y appeared MARVIN E. SMITH nosed and stated that: nple owner of the following has a street address of 5715 The East 180 feet of%'�O t 98. GOLDEN G X , according to the plat thereof, as recorded in ok 7, page �S, of tcords ofCollier County, Florida, by virtue of that certain Deed dated De 10 1 . given by Seacrest Homes, Inc., a Florida corporation, Grantor, to MARVIN E. SMITH and EVA. M. SMITH, Husband and Wife, Grantees, which is recorded in Official Records Book 1402, at Page 8, and re- recorded in Official Records Book 1408 at page 1205, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 3. 1 certify and warrant that said EVA M. SMITH, also known as EVA MAI SMITH, and I were married to each other continuously without interruption tiom before the time we acquired title to the property described above until and including the date said EVA M. SMITH died, to wit, October 27, 2004. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH N'AL'GHJ. ILA 7-Q- Paec I of 2 *** OR: 3878 PG: 0333 *** MARVIN E. SMITH, Affiant 5715 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34116 SWORN TO (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on ;51s- W, , 2005, by MARVIN E. SMITH, who produced Dt'. as idLent --ification. [seal] PATRICA s. smiTH Y :P COMMISSION # DD 092703 EXPIRES Apn1 6, 2006 lint name]: 151131 ft.c Yft N., q,pk UMeiwNers NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA My Commission expires; OU E C rr- Page 3 of 2 - ollier County Clerk of the Circuit Court :: Document Details Print Page 1 of I htt„ olark rollier fl nc /nr;snuhhcncces.s /view document details print .asox ?DOCID= c22ebede- e59c -... 3/4/2007 ext. e Recorded Date: 8/29/2005 12:53:00 PM Instrument #: 3688080 Book Type: OR Comments: 10/27/04 Book: 3878 Page: 334 Page Count: 1 Doc Type: DC Case Number(s): Amount: 0 Document Confidential Document Contains Redaction From: FLORIDA VITAL STATISTICS To: SMITH EVA MAI Page 1 of I htt„ olark rollier fl nc /nr;snuhhcncces.s /view document details print .asox ?DOCID= c22ebede- e59c -... 3/4/2007 P-1-111-ft INJIG t� / -/� LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Athina Kyritsis, Manager of Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC, to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application numbered CP- 2005 -5. -a Signed: Date: i I W/O') I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FOREGOING APPLICATION, AND THAT THE APPLICATION IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOArw_'o WLEDGE. l �/Ji I — A NAME — D OR PRINTED SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF (�� COUNTY OF ( ) SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE YIE THIS DAY OFAA4!�r_ 2007 BY IV .1 (NOTARY PUBLIC) SIGNATURE Nn' COYLYIISSION EXPIRES: G SEAL. `� �� Nolay WibAc • StMe of Fbdda COM*W nE*=Mm)3i,20M NIY CONaIISSION NUMBER: � Cmak"#DD Bolded By NOMW No" Ann. CHOOSE NE OF THE FOLLOWING: WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ',fE, OR WHO HAS PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, AND / DID TAKE AN OATH ✓ DID NOT TYKE AN OATH NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 837.06 — FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS LAW STATES THAT: "WHOEVER KNOWINGLY MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT IN WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO MISLEAD A PUBLIC SERVANT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTY SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR OF THE SECOND DEGREE, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY A FINE TO A MAXIMUM OF $500.00 AND /OR MAXIMUM OF A SIXTY DAY JAIL TERM. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Athina Kyritsis, Manager of Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC, to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application numbered CP- 2005 -5. Si Date: A 0 ` I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FOREGOING APPLICATION, AND THAT THE APPLICATION IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. (`.pro u NAME — TYPED OR PRINTED SIGNATURE OF -.- STATE OF ( F ) COUNTY OF ( IPI 1 SWORN TO AND /SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS �_ DAY OF x7414 •�, 2007 By ✓ /e (NOTARY PUBLIC) SI NATURE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /VVf9 5/ ( {Q / SEAL: wffiiv; F& MY COMMISSION NUMBER: J ' CHOOS NE OF THE FOLLOWING: �� WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TOME, OR WHO HAS PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, AND DID TAKE AN OATH ✓DID NOT TAKE AN OATH NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 837.06 - FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS LAW STATES THAT: "WHOEVER KNOWINGLY MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT IN WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO MISLEAD A PUBLIC SERVANT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTY SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR OF THE SECOND DEGREE, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY A FINE TO A MAXIMUM OF $500.00 AND /OR MAXIMUM OF A SIXTY DAY JAIL TERM. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Athina Kyritsis, Manager of Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC, to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application numbered CP- 2005 -5. Signed: Y6 Date: I HEREBY CERT FY THAT I HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FOREGOING APPLICATION, AND THAT THE APPLICATION IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Le017WOJotL NAME — TYPED OR PRINTED SIGNA F APPLICANT -- STATE OF ( 0) COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 2007 BY BY 1 ✓ � (NOTARY PUBLIC) SIGNATURE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3Q MY COMMISSION NUMBER: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: d/ WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR � 4 WHO HAS PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, AND DID TAKE AN OATH DID NOT TAKE AN OATH NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 837.06 - FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS LAW STATES THAT: "WHOEVER KNOWINGLY MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT IN WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO MISLEAD A PUBLIC SERVANT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTY SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR OF THE SECOND DEGREE, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY A FINE TO A MAXIMUM OF $500.00 AND /OR MAXIMUM OF A SIXTY DAY JAIL TERM. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Athina Kyritsis, Manager of Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC, to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application numbered CP- 2005 -5. Signed: J r �— Date: _/ 7 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FOREGOING APPLICATION, AND THAT THE APPLICATION IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. S1 u -e— v-� C i'tra « NAME — TYPED OR PRINTED STATE OF COUNTY OF SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS _ DAY OF 2007 BY ; // / " (NOTARYPUBLIC) SIGNATURE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ,�I SEAL: MY COMMISSION NUMBER: Igh CHOO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR 7 WHO HAS PRODUCED AND J)ID TAKE AN OATH ; DID NOT TAKE AN OATH "' PAIXSCHWARTZ NO" R MMo -SWe of Fbft CWMdW $0D 9rtl�d8yN@ WNrryApe. AS IDENTIFICATION, NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 837.06 — FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS LAW STATES THAT: "WHOEVER KNOWINGLY MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT IN WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO MISLEAD A PUBLIC SERVANT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTY SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR OF THE SECOND DEGREE, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY A FINE TO A MAXIMUM OF $500.00 AND /OR MAXIMUM OF A SIXTY DAY JAIL TERM. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Athina Kyritsis, Manager of Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC, to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application numbered CP- 2005 -5. Signed: JJe'+il/v�,� _J��ate: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FOREGOING APPLICATION, AND THAT THE APPLICATION IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. NAME — TYPED OR PRINTED SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF ( F \ i�zll \ 1 "- 1 COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE NEE THIS 10 DAY OF 2007 BY, (NOTARY PUBLIC) SIGNATURE . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IEEANh� GRA ! fl MY CONL\USSION EXPIRES: b O SEAL: Comm ssion ;o # DD022187� (a Ernes 6/1IrAW MY CONalISSION NUMBER: NaAde yip CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TOME, OR WHO HAS PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, AND DID TAKE AN OATH DID NOT TAKE AN OATH NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 837.06 - FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS LAW STATES THAT: "WHOEVER KNOWINGLY MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT IN WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO MISLEAD A PUBLIC SERVANT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTY SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR OF THE SECOND DEGREE, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY A FINE TO A MAXIMUM OF $500.00 AND /OR MAXIMUM OF A SIXTY DAY JAIL TERM. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: I hereby authorize Athina Kyritsis, Manager of Colonnade on Santa Barbara LLC, to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application numbered CP- 2005 -5. Date:'��1�0�� 'HE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE FOREGOING APPLICATION, AND THAT THE APPLICATION IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. n fft i /0 .T /A NAME — tYPED OR PRINTED _,5fGNAiyiWF APPLICANT ._ STATE OF (i(_� COUNTY OF (— tt//'++r� � SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THI DAY OF 2007 By , ' ` (NOTARY PUBLIC) ¢7rN ATT TRF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: lfl� 7-0 MY COMMISSION NUMBER: / CHOO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME, OR w LLSCHWARTZ SEAL: "" NohryPUM -State ofFW& Cwaft ioaEapirnMay31,2009 CorraM e 0 DD 435939 9=W 8I' NdmW Nobly Am. WHO HAS PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, AND / DID TAKE AN OATH DID NOT TAKE AN OATH NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 837.06 — FALSE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS LAW STATES THAT: "WHOEVER KNOWINGLY MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT IN WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO MISLEAD A PUBLIC SERVANT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTY SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR OF THE SECOND DEGREE, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY A FINE TO A MAXIMUM OF $500.00 AND /OR MAXIMUM OF A SIXTY DAY JAIL TERM. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Goodlette Coleman and Johnson r.n ana y. yr (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed: �e` RY[ - �• � /_ =,Ef Date: ��5 �O 5� (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant M4 /2 i%Ln/ r. - rW1-Y1 Name — Typed or Printed STATE OF COUNTY OF( i 1 ) pp�pp Sworn to and subscribe before me this t I h day of Nl � , 2005 By p (Notary Publi MY COMMISSIN EXPIRES: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced Ltd as identification and D did take an Oath ppgryllblC•>NONal�p�i did not take an Oath C�awatMen+! OOQ�NI! NOTICE — BE AWARE THA Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Goodlette Coleman and Johnson Y A ana V vraay rvimor king nssuc., r -e - (Name of Agent - typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend th llier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Applicatt f Signed::,,; Date: ame of OvAe Record) v I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. i Signature of Apfficant 1, IFO AZ Caw Name - Typed or Printed STATE OF ( I t o(t v 9J1 COUNTY OF sj� 1 Sworn t d subscrib before me this i d� day of F �t , 2005 ublic) MY COMMISSIN EXPIRES: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, � —_ who has produced 1-� ce'1 Se as identification and OMO LNGA3 did take an Oath NotaWputfyo.Sk"ofP " lC did not take an Oath BpYmJm9Af 2000 Comm *m * ODN6 M NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: latdad NalontiNOlaryAan Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Goodlette Coleman and Johnson, P.A. al (Name of Agent - typed or to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Applicatio Signed::. . Date: SJ O� (Name of O r of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowled". u Name - Typed or Printed STATE OF COUNTY OF ( Sworn to d subsc 'bed before me this VAI, day of ��l \ 2005 By (htot Public) MY COMMISS[N EXPIRES: CHOOSE ONE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, _ who has produced '1-) r el� & as identification and =-=6SW1= did take an Oath - WOO of PbWa � did not take an Oath n *� NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: lorKNNolaryA9M Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 Y LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Goodlette Coleman and Johnson Y.A. and V. Uraav Minor ana Assoc., F.A. (Name of Agent - typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a reaue , to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting p tom- ^ atIon. ` Date: wners) of Recor I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowled e. ature of Applicant STATE OF( ROf 1 O� ) COUNTY OF CK.P V-r Sworn to d subscribed befo me t ' By (Notary Public CHOOS NE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and Jar AMANDAJ.EGAN did take an Oath !H{ MY COMMISSION# DD045042 did not take an Oath V? a aXPIR�:Semx.07,mos Iaoosrurury aNO�.ys«wmamamu.mo. NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: ) A L s 1'VlA C 6 Cl ao V Name - Typed or Printed day of KV6 L 12005 MY COMMISSIN EXPIRES: 9-3--OS Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize of Agent - typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. � Signed: * 2 Z:� 6,7 > Date: (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF for( ! COUNTY OF Af -J,� Signature of Applicant Srr-yr ;nd IA /_CT- R of Name - Typed or Printed A-(-\ Sworn to�and�subscribed before me this I By I (Notary Public) day of Ae rl , 2005 MY COMMISSIN EXPIRES: -� CH OOS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and �y+ did take an Oath I +� did not take an Oath ,+ eo aararnm NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 as identification AMANDALEGAN MY COMMISSION N DD D15D12 EXPIRES: Sep wmbm U7,2005 R namry SK" S emaq, xw. Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Goodlette Coleman and Johnson P.A. and O. Grady Minor and Assoc., P.A. (Name of Agent - typed or printed) to serve as my Agent ' re pest to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in ion. Signed: Date: April 21, 2005 (Name of ner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. DING iN1QAt NdWhuMbw-OWN&otilalda Signa re of Applicant BpMJa�2l,2D71 C* n nbdon • OD28W72 loncMdev.0 MR STATE OF( r- -oRt Dt 1 COUNTY OF ( Co L4\ E V. 1 Athina k yAitsis managing member Name - Typed or Printed Sworn tg and subscribed before me this By (�) *OPub�fic) CHQOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: X who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath 9 day of A,'P9 t t_ 12005 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: as identification Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 WilsonMiller� New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering Growth Management Plan Amendment Application For Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Prepared for: The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 Prepared by: WilsonMiller, Inc. r— 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 and Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Bldg. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 April 22, 2005 REVISED June 12, 2006 (in response to Collier County staff sufficiency letter dated May 3, 2006) Resubmitted September 12, 2006 (after receipt of finding of sufficient application) Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 wilsonmiller.com Growth Management Plan Amendment Application For Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Prepared for: The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 Prepared by: WilsonMiller, Inc. -- 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 and Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Bldg. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 April 22, 2005 REVISED June 12, 2006 (in response to Collier County staff sufficiency letter dated May 3, 2006) Resubmitted September 12, 2006 (after receipt of finding of sufficient application) Growth Management Plan Amendment Application For Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Cover /Submittal Letter dated April 21, 2005 Sufficiency Review Letter to Richard Yovanovich from Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, dated May 3, 2006 Sufficiency Response Letter to Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, from Richard Yovanovich, dated June 12, 2006 Final Sufficiency Review Letter from Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, to Richard Yovanovich, dated September 5, 2006 Application for a Request to Amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan Corporate Resolution — David Lawrence Foundation Letter from Church of God Regarding Board of Trustees List of Exhibits: Exhibit A Copies of deeds to properties Exhibit B Proposed language amendment Exhibit C Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment Exhibit D General Location Map /FLUE Designation Exhibit E Aerial Exhibit F FLUCCS Map Exhibit G Soils Map Exhibit H Listed Plant and Animal Species Exhibit H1 Listed Species Survey — Log of Time Spent On Site Exhibit H2 Listed Species Survey — Transect Map Exhibit I Letter from Division of Historical Resources Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit O Exhibit P Exhibit Q 9812 151112 Ve[W- MPERRV croU N015S011 -000. PCOP 2929 County's Historical /Archaeological Sites Map Public Facilities Summary Public Facilities Map Utilities Location Exhibit Service Availability Letter to FGUA Service Availability Letter to Waste Management Flood Insurance Rate Map Traffic Impact Statement GOODLETTE COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Kevin G. Coleman Northern Trust Bank Building J. Dudley Goodlette 4001 Tamiami Trail North Kenneth R. Johnson Naples, Florida 34103 Richard D. Yovanovich (239) 435 -3535 Harold J. Webre, III (239) 435 -1218 Facsimile Edmond E. Koester Linda C. Brinkman Craig D. Grider Gregory L. Urbancic Matthew L. Grabinski Matthew R. Galloway Writer's e-mail: rvovanovich(a„ gcilaw.corn April 21, 2005 Via Hand Delivery David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Collier County Comprehensive Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment Dear David: Per our pre - application meeting held on March 28, 2005, we are submitting an application to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Collier County Growth Management Plan on behalf of the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God. One original and five copies are being provided along with a check in the amount of $16,550.00. This application proposes the creation of a new subdistrict to be known as the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict" on approximately 16.3 acres of property located at 1 -75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. As we discussed, the expansion of Golden Gate Parkway inhibits the ability of these properties to expand as planned. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for the continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and Parkway Community Church of God as well as to allow for the planned expansion of these uses. The Subdistrict will allow for these properties to be redeveloped as institutional uses in the future. The uses allowed in the Subdistrict are very limited and are compatible with the surrounding area. David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Collier County Comprehensive Planning April 21, 2005 Page Two If you have any questions about this application or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me or Margaret Perry at Wilson Miller (239 - 649 - 4040). We look forward to working with your staff in the processing of this application. Very truly yours, 0 Richard D. Yovanovich RDY:smc Enclosures SADATAMPDATA \LITIGATE \David Lawrence \4- 20- 05weeks.doc May 3, 2006 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Community Development and Environmental Services Division Comprehensive Planning Department " 2800 North Horseshoe Drive " Naples, Florida 34104 Mr. Richard Yovanovich, Esquire Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Ste. 300 Naples, FL 34103 RE: Sufficiency Review of Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -6, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Dear Mr. Yovanovich: Pursuant to Paragraph 6.3. of Resolution #97 -431, this letter is to inform you that the referenced Application is deemed insufficient. The following items need to be corrected, addressed, or added: 1. Disclosure of Interest Information II.B: Provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify Chair is the authorized representative for the David Lawrence Foundation. 2. Disclosure of Interest Information II.C: Provide documentation to verify Trustees listed in the application are the authorized representatives for the Parkway Community Church of God (e.g. provide meeting minutes, etc., which identifies and authorizes listed individuals to conduct business on behalf of the church); Trustees listed in the application differ from the Trustees listed on the Deed. 3. Exhibit B: Add Policy 1. 1.2 and revise to reflect proposed Subdistrict. 4. Type of Request IV.C: Revise to read, From: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict" ... To: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict" D"--- 11101 4n1 12nn C..., /010A 641 6n6Q ..,..,.., — 11;o.e...,..o, 5 Required Information V.A.2, Exhibit E: Identify source on aerial. 6 Required Information V A.3 Exhibit D: Identify the existing land use on all properties within 500 feet from the boundaries of the subject property, e.g. Estates - Developed, Residential Single Family Home or Estates — Undeveloped tract. 7 Required Information V.C. Exhibits F G. & H (Comments provided by the Environmental Planning Services Staff): (Exhibits F & G)The Soils Map indicates the entire site contains hydric soils, but the FLUCCS map does not indicate any wetland jurisdictional determination; provide a copy of SFWMD Wetland Jurisdictional Line for the site and delineate on the FLUCCS Map. (Exhibit H) Provide a current listed species survey for the site that includes: date, time, and etc. of listed species inspection; and, identify the specific species surveyed on the site. 8. Required Information V.D.5: Request includes: expansion of the existing David Lawrence Facility; expansion of the existing church facility — Community Parkway Church of God; and, specific associated and non - associated uses: Group Care Facilities (Categories I & II), Nursing homes, ALFs, Essential Services, Private Schools, Day Care Centers, Libraries, Government Offices, Medical Offices associated w/ Group Care Facilities, and Civic and Cultural Facilities. • For each Tract, provide the acreage acquired by the County for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion. • Provide the SDP or other plans prepared for the expansion of the David Lawrence Facility prior to this application for a GMPA. • Provide justification /rationale for the proposed uses not generally associated with a church or mental health care and substance abuse treatment facility, i.e. libraries, government offices, and etc. • Address compatibility of new and expanded uses with surrounding properties. 9. Public Facilities V.E.1, Exhibits K, N. & O: Provide responses from FGUA (Exhibits N & O). Provide projected commencement and build -out dates for project. List name of service provider, provide existing LOSS for Solid Waste (refer to 2005 AUI R), and, identify potential impacts from the proposed and expanded uses. 10. Public Facilities V. E.2, Exhibit L: Include the Golden Gate Sheriff's Substation on the map. Please address and /or provide the information as outlined above by June 4, 2006. Please note this letter is only to advise of a sufficiency finding, not to comment or advise on issues or concerns pertaining to the requested text and /or map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (GGAMP) to create the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Additionally, pursuant to Section 10.03.05F1 of the Local Development Code, adopted on June 8, 2005 (Ordinance #05 -27), there is now a requirement that the applicant coordinate, through the Community Planning Coordinator, Linda Bedtelyon, the holding of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. This Neighborhood Information Meeting will be the responsibility of the applicant. You may contact Ms. Bedtelyon at 213 -2948 if you have any questions. However, it is not expected that the first public hearings (transmittal hearings) will be held until early next year and that the timing of the Neighborhood Information Meeting should be such that it occurs just prior to the transmittal hearings which are held before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 403 -2466. Sincerely, is el , Al P Principal ner CC: CP- 2005 -6 File David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Department Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator Kevin G. Coleman J. Dudley Goodlette Kenneth R. Johnson Richard D. Yovanovich Edmond E. Koester GOODLETTE COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North Naples, F1 34103 (239) 435 -3535 (239) 435 -1218 Facsimile June 12, 2006 Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Community Development and Environmental Services Department of Comprehensive Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34105 Linda C. Brinkman Stephen C. Pierce Gregory L. Urbancic William M. Burke Craig D. Grider Matthew L. Grabinski Matthew R. Galloway Matthew M. Jackson Alex R. Figares Jeffrey J. Beihoff Writer's e-mail: ryovanovich&gglaw.com Via Hand Delivery RE: Sufficiency Response for Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -6, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Dear Ms. Mosca: We are in receipt of your letter dated May 3, 2006, indicating that the above- referenced application was deemed insufficient. We offer the following information in response to your request. Our response to each item is indicated in bold. 1. Disclosure of Interest Information II.B: Provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify Chair is the authorized representative for the David Lawrence Foundation. A copy of a Corporate Resolution for the David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. is included with the revised application. 2. Disclosure of Interest Information II.C: Provide documentation to verify Trustees listed in the application are the authorized representatives for the Parkway Community Church of God (e.g. provide meeting minutes, etc., which identifies and authorizes listed individuals to conduct business on behalf of the church); Trustees listed in the application differ from the Trustees listed on the Deed. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 2 of 5 Documentation verifying that the Trustees are authorized representatives is included with the revised application. 3. Exhibit B: Add Policy 1.1.2 and revise to reflect proposed Subdistrict. Exhibit B has been revised to reflect the proposed Subdistrict. 4. Type of Request IV.C: Revise to read, From: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict' ... To: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict' Application has been revised to reflect this language. 5. Required Information V.A.2, Exhibit E: Identify source on aerial. Exhibit E has been revised to indicate the source of the aerial (2005 Collier County Property Appraiser). 6. Required Information V.A.3, Exhibit D: Identify the existing land use on all properties within 500 feet from the boundaries of the subject property, e.g. Estates - Developed, Residential Single Family Home or Estates — Undeveloped tract. Exhibit D has been revised to indicate developed and undeveloped tracts. (Exhibits F & G)The Soils Map indicates the entire site contains hydric soils, but the FLUCCS map does not indicate any wetland jurisdictional determination; provide a copy of SFWMD Wetland Jurisdictional Line for the site and delineate on the FLUCCS Map. A SFWMD wetland determination has not been performed on the subject property. WilsonMiller is in the process of submitting a wetland determination application to SFWMD and will provide a copy of the approved wetland determination to Collier County when it is received. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) mapped the site as containing hydric soils. However, small non - hydric soil inclusions (uplands) were often not mapped on properties by NRCS because of their small size. This becomes obvious when the FLUCCS map shows a section of the property containing pine flatwoods with saw palmetto ground cover, which typically occurs in upland (non - hydric) soils. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 3 of 5 Historically 50 -60 years ago, this property may have exhibited hydric soil conditions. However, the construction of 1 -75 and canal, residential homes, and CR 951 and canal have altered ground water levels and severed wetland sheet flow in this region of Collier County. No signs of standing water, no hydric soil indicators and no living cypress knees indicate that this site no longer exhibits wetland characteristics. WilsonMiller does not anticipate SFWMD or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to assert wetland jurisdiction over any areas of the site. (Exhibit H) Provide a current listed species survey for the site that includes: date, time, and etc. of listed species inspection; and, identify the specific species surveyed on the site. WilsonMiller had previously provided Exhibit H in the original submittal which was a summary table of listed plant and wildlife species that have the potential to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site. The Collier County Comprehensive Plan Amendment application criteria does not require that a listed species survey be performed. However, WilsonMiller performed a listed species survey to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) standards to address staff comments and to alleviate any listed species issues Collier County or the FWC may have regarding the development of this project. WilsonMiller Exhibit H1, includes a table of the name of the ecologist, dates and times performing the listed species survey, site conditions and total hours spent on the property. WilsonMiller Exhibit H2, contains the approximate location of listed species transects performed on the property. The listed species survey concentrated on the species most likely to occur on the site: Big Cypress fox squirrel, gopher tortoise, Florida black bear, and Florida panther. The Florida black bear and Florida panther are wide- ranging animals that have a low probability utilizing the site, primarily due to the property's geographical location. The subject property is surrounded by residential and non - residential development, major and secondary roads and highways, and canals. No signs of Florida panther or Florida black bear inhabiting or utilizing the site were documented during the listed species survey. The property contains a portion of pine flatwoods with a ground cover of saw palmetto. Use of the site by the Big Cypress fox squirrel and gopher tortoise was a possibility. However, gopher tortoise and Big Cypress fox squirrel were not documented utilizing or inhabiting the site. The only listed plant species observed on the site was the common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), twisted air plant (Tillandsia tlexuosa) and giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata). These plants are listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture as endangered and are not listed by the FWC or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 8. Required Information V.D.5: Request includes: expansion of the existing David Lawrence Facility; expansion of the existing church facility — Community Parkway Church of God; and, specific associated and non - associated uses: Group Care Facilities (Categories I & II), Nursing homes, ALFs, Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 4 of 5 Essential Services, Private Schools, Day Care Centers, Libraries, Government Offices, Medical Offices associated w/ Group Care Facilities, and Civic and Cultural Facilities. • For each Tract, provide the acreage acquired by the County for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion. Section V.D.5 of the application has been revised to include this information. • Provide the SDP or other plans prepared for the expansion of the David Lawrence Facility prior to this application for a GMPA. The David Lawrence facility has been operating at the current location since 1969 and has been expanded several times in the subsequent years. The most recent application for expansion was made in February 2002 (SDP -AR- 2072). However, the application was not completed as the significant right -of -way taking for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion and the Golden Gate Parkway /I -75 interchange made the proposed expansion to David Lawrence Center application unable to meet the County's requirements for native vegetation preservation and stormwater management areas. • Provide justification /rationale for the proposed uses not generally associated with a church or mental health care and substance abuse treatment facility, i.e. libraries, government offices, and etc. Section V.D.5 of the application has been revised to address this item. Address compatibility of new and expanded uses with surrounding properties. Section V.D.5 of the application has been revised to address this item. 9. Public Facilities V.E.1, Exhibits K, N. & O: • Provide responses from FGUA (Exhibits N & O). To date, no response has been received from Florida Government Utility Authority to our request for service availability letter dated April 14, 2005. Included in the revised application, Exhibit N, is a follow up request letter to Bill Faust. • Provide projected commencement and build -out dates for project. Exhibit K has been revised to include projected commencement and build -out dates for the project under the paragraph "other." • List name of service provider, provide existing LOSS for Solid Waste (refer to 2005 AUIR), and, identify potential impacts from the proposed and expanded uses. Exhibit K has been revised to include the service provider (Collier County Solid Waste Management). Exhibit K also includes the level of service standard for solid waste per the 2005 AUIR. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 5 of 5 10. Public Facilities V.E.2, Exhibit L: • Include the Golden Gate Sheriff's Substation on the map. Exhibit L, Public Facilities Map, has been revised to include the Golden Gate Sheriff's Substation. I hope that the information contained in this response letter and the revised application and associated exhibits adequately address the items raised in your letter dated May 3, 2006. We will coordinate with you and Linda Bedtelyon regarding scheduling a neighborhood information meeting when advised that it is time to do so. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 435 -3535, or Margaret Perry at WilsonMiller, 649 -4040. in, Richard D. Yovanovich cc: David Schimmel, David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Scott Geltemeyer, David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Margaret Perry, WilsonMiller, Inc. RDY:tlm S: \DATA \WPDATA \LAND USE\DAVID LAWRENCE \SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE 6- 12- 06.DOC September 5, 2006 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERMENT Community Development and Environmental Services Division Comprehensive Planning Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104 Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 I-..4 1. i i.,� t, ' ..�'� -R SEP 9 7 2006 RE: Final Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CP- 2005 -6, proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Dear Mr. Yovanovich: Pursuant to Paragraph B.2 of Resolution #97 -431, please be advised the referenced application is deemed sufficient. Please note this letter is only to advise of a sufficiency finding, not to comment or advise on issues or concerns pertaining to the requested text and /or map amendment to the Growth Management Plan (Golden Gate Area Master Plan). Please submit, to my attention — by October 6. 2006 — the original and twenty-five (25) copies of the complete, assembled (3 -hole punch) GMP amendment application. Though this should be an adequate number of petitions, please know that it is possible that a few additional copies may be needed after the BCC hearing, if approved, to transmit to state agencies. Also, please be advised the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) Transmittal public hearing for this petition, and others in the 2005 cycle of Growth Management Plan amendments, is tentatively scheduled for February 19, 2007, and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Transmittal public hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 2, 2007. The CCPC hearing begins at 8:30 a.m., the BCC hearing begins at 9:00 a.m., and both are held in the BCC Meeting Room on the 3ftl Floor of the W. Harmon Turner Administration Building (Building F), Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, 34112. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2005 -27, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is now required for GMP amendment petitions; the NIM must be held prior to the CCPC Transmittal hearing. Please contact Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator, at 213 -2948, to coordinate the scheduling of the NIM. A second NIM will only be required if substantial changes are made to the petition subsequent to the Transmittal hearings. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerel Mic ele osca, AICP Principal Planner cc: CP- 2005 -6 File VI Margret Perry, Wilson Miller Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator C o f • I '7 e C o u n c y nom--- "v„nm 1 11n L.... 1�101I 111OA(. APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER: DATE RECEIVED: PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: DATE SUFFICIENT: PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (239) 403 -2300; Fax: (239) 643- 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at (239) 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Lisa Merritt Chair Company The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Mailing Address 6075 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239 -455 -1031 Fax Number 239 - 455 -6561 B. Name of Applicant(s) Paul S Dykes Len E. Coley Paul Bellofutto Trustees Company Parkway Community Church of God Mailing Address 5975 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239 -455 -1534 Fax Number 239 - 455 -4637 5n112M-160802 Ver'. OV- MPERRY vq NO15S011 -W0. POOP- 29268 C. Name of Agent* Richard Yovanovich * THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company /Firm Goodlette Coleman and Johnson P.A. Mailing Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239 - 435 -3535 Fax Number 239-435 -1218 Email Address ryovanovich(a)gcilaw com D. Name of Owner(s) of Record Same as applicants. Mailing Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. WilsonMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Margaret Perry, AICP Jared Brown, P.E. Jeff Perry, AICP Tom Trettis, PWS, CE Katherine Chachere DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership 581/299& 159992 Ver Otb MPERRY N01 N915S91 1 990. PCOP 29249 B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. David Lawrence Center is owned by The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc., a Florida Non - Profit Corporation. The Officers of this corporation are listed below. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Carol Ann Mav, Chair Michael H. Morris Immediate Past Chair Jean Ackerman, 1St Vice Chair Lisa Merritt Treasurer John Scot Mueller Secretary C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Q M LT /200& 150802 Var 016 WEPFY NO15S01I OM POOP- 29249 Parkway Community Church of God is owned by the Local Board of Trustees of the Church of God. The Trustees are listed below. Tony Stewart is the pastor of the Church. Name and Address Paul S. Dykes Trustee Len E. Coley Trustee Paul Belafato Trustee Percentage of Interest If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired ® leased ❑ : Terms of lease yrs /mos. Please see copies of deeds, Exhibit A. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description Tracts 43 50 59. and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates B. Section: 29 Township: 49 South Range: 26 East C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 38163640007 38164200006, 38165120004, 38165640005 D. General Location North side of Golden Gate Parkway between 1 -75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard E. Planning Community Golden Gate F. TAZ 193 G. Size in Acres ±16.3 H. Zoning E- Estates Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) Golden Gate Estates IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. 91 12M- 150802 Ve[011- MPERRV N015S011 -O06 POOP- 29240 Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: ❑ Future Land Use ❑ Immokalee Area Master Plan ❑ Transportation ❑ Coastal & Conservation ❑ Intergovernmental Coord. ❑ Sanitary Sewer ❑ Drainage ® Golden Gate Area Master Plan ❑ Capital Improvement ❑ Housing ❑ Recreation & Open Space ❑ Potable Water ❑ Solid Waste ❑ Natural Groundwater Aquifer Amend Page(s) 5. 42 and 45 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element As Follows: (Use Gress thFoug hs to identify language to be deleted; Use 4 Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please see Exhibit B. C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, FROM: Estates Designation Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict District, Subdistrict TO: Estates Designation Estates — Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict District, Subdistrict [If new District and /or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. Please see Exhibit C. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) E. Describe additional changes requested: N/A V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8 % x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE 1. ® Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Please see Exhibit D. 2. ® Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Please see Exhibit E. 3. ® Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. Please see Exhibit D. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. ® Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. Please see Exhibit D. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. ® Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Please see Exhibits F and G. 2. ® Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, 513'IN0& 150802 Var 01L MPERRV CNU 415&011 -000. PLOP- 29249 avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). Please see Exhibits H1 and H2. 3. ® Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological State. Please see Exhibits I and J. D. GROWTH MANAGMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district/subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district/subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). Per staff request in their sufficiency letter dated May 3, 2006, the following information is provided: • For each Tract, provide the acreage acquired by the County for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion: Golden Gate Estates Unit 30 Tract No. FDOT ROW Taking acres Collier County ROW Easement acres Total acres 43 1.02 0 1.02 50 1.18 0 1.18 59 0.21 0.27 0.48 66 0 0.25 0.25 5/]1200&150602 Ver'. 011- MPERRV coa N0155- 011 -00D PLOP- 29249 Provide the SDP or other plans prepared for the expansion of the David Lawrence Facility prior to this application for GMPA. The David Lawrence Facility has been operating at the current location since 1969 and has been expanded several times in the subsequent years. The most recent application for expansion was made in February 2002 (SDP -AR- 2072). However, the application was not completed as the significant right -of -way taking for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion and the Golden Gate Parkway /1 -75 interchange made the proposed expansion to David Lawrence Center application unable to meet the County's requirements for native vegetation preservation and stormwater management areas. • Provide justification /rationale for the proposed uses not generally associated with a church or mental health care and substance abuse treatment facility, i.e., libraries, government offices, and etc. The proposed Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is intended to provide for the continued operation of the existing uses (church and mental health facility) and the potential for development or redevelopment of the property for similar service and institutional, low impact uses, such as day care centers, nursing homes, essential services, libraries, etc. The proposed subdistrict has been designed with a specific level of flexibility for the future, that would permit with the appropriate approvals (conditional use or PUD), some similar (yet different from the existing) uses that might also be found compatible with the surrounding land uses, and be deemed appropriate for the specific location. The fact that the subdistrict is immediately adjacent to a multi -lane arterial -level highway lends the subdistrict's location to uses that might benefit from better roadway access, such as government offices or libraries, uses that are "active" during the day, but are frequently non - intrusive in the evening and at night. The uses proposed for the Subdistrict are very limited, and will require further permitting processes either through the conditional use process or a rezone to PUD process, thereby providing for public input and hearings to ensure that any new proposed use will be compatible and complementary to the surrounding area. • Address compatibility of new and expanded uses with surrounding properties. The uses permitted within the proposed subdistrict are generally considered to be compatible with the permitted uses in the district due to adjacency to the arterial -level highway, large tract sizes and required design and compatibility- related development standards that accompany such development, including buffering and open space requirements. Historically, these types of uses, as evidenced by the existing institutional and church uses (approved as conditional uses) have been able to demonstrate their compatible nature during the required public hearing and site plan approval process. As such compatibility of proposed new uses will be determined through either the conditional use or rezoning to PUD process. The existing uses (church and mental health facility) were previously approved through the conditional use process, and were found to be compatible with the surrounding properties. Expansion of the existing uses on the properties with prior conditional use approval (Tracts 43, 50, and 59) will be allowed through the permitting process (site development plan). Expansion of the existing uses on the property without conditional use approval (Tract 66) will require conditional use approval by the Board of County $ IQ1 150602 Ven Otl- MPEFPY N015S011 -0M PCOP- 29249 Commissioners. Compatibility of any expansion of the existing uses on Tract 66 would have to addressed during the conditional use approval process. E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: x Potable Water x Sanitary Sewer x Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS x Drainage x Solid Waste x Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). x Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. x Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. Please see Exhibits K - Q. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. ® Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Zone X. 2. ® Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). Not applicable. 3. ® Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable. Not applicable. 4. ® Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable. Not applicable. 5. ® High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). Not applicable. G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. ® $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. ❑ $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made 5/]1000&150003 Ver'. 011- MPERRV N0155-011.000. POOP- 29249 payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. ❑ Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly) 4. ® Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). Exhibit A. 5. ® Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. ® 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -1/2 x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 513112C 150902 Ver'. 01 F- MPERRV W N015S01 b000. POOP 29208 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich (Name of Agent – typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Manag ment Plan affecting property Identified in the Application. Signed,: `— Date: A , y25 ,,L-fl ame of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that i have the authority to make the foTgping-application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Lisa Merritt Chair Name – Typed or Printed The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. STATE OF COUNTY OF (� ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of , 2006 BY T� MY COMMISSION (N ary blic) WMPOS-Nod lMlM YMJM2116 CHOO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, w^hc has produced and did take an Oath �F did not take an Oath as identification NOTICE – BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 – False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a Public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of 4be second degrm punishabie as provided by a fine to a rnaxirntrr^ c`a S60C.OG andios - raximuax of a siacty Slav )ail fierrn." �t2vn. eweaz vmac..wEasv T r LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich (Name of Agent - typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed:1�(z� Date: �� i 3 Signed: -444 Date: " Signed: Date:' (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Paul S. Dykes. Trustee Name - Typed or Printed Park Community Church of God x Signature of Applica t Len E. Colev. Trustee Name - Typed or Printed Parkway CommuniV Church of God Signature of App ica !! Paul Belefeto l ?F, f 1 1.4;.1 Tr-b Name - Typed or Printed Parkway Community Church of God 4'1W2005-151W8 Ver 011 - MPERRV N015"11-0 PLOP 29249 STATE OF (' COUNTY OF Sworn to and subscribed before me this By.r✓C�zs1 (� ary Public) CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath 'V day of 20 MY COMMISSION .. f'F.: JANICE P. MIL LARD -v: r MY COMMISSION # DO 188809 EXPIRES: November2o,2008 tqj BoMedTtwu NO yPimudrmn= as identification STATE OF ( ) COUNTYOF z Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of 20_Sl ByL La .& ANotary Public) CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath Q181200S 151088 Ve[ 016 MPERRY N015S011- 000 -PCOP -29249 MY COMMISSIO JANICE P. MILLARD h: r MY COMMISSION 8 DD 166809 a EXPIRES: November 20,2006 kfi,tS eonxdrna Not" Plmmunarok«. as identification LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. igned: 1 cz c� Date: 5 — O ` (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Paul S Dykes, Trustee Name — Typed or Printed Parkway Community Church of God STATE OF (�A k.oi 1 cici_. ) COUNTY OF ( (,O(` t ,;� r ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this �� "Y day of 3, j VI �� - , (Notary Pubic) C� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: X_ who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath as identification NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: 20-Q fl� (J, i� iii C• Cv r' P Kenberly K Mayeu ,f My Commission 00115021 Expkes June 29,2W6 Florida Statute Section 837.06 — False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 411012005 - 151000 Vb 01!- MPERRV UWl N0155-01 b000. PCOP- 29249 FOUNDATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES Carol E Shaw Fxecukve [?;rector Lisa Merritt Chairman Jean Ackerman Beth Shaw - Adelman Clay W. Cone Charles Denny Elynor Hegel William Jensen William Hobgood, Esq. Charles Krause, M.D. Dick Lynch, Esq. Carol Ann May John Mueller Molly Ottina, E.D. Elizabeth Star Jayme Whitcomb 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34116 voice 239- 455 -8500 fax 239 - 455 -6561 www.davidlawrencecenter.org CORPORATE RESOLUTION AND CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY I, the undersigned hereby certify that I am the Chairperson and custodian of the records of David Lawrence Foundation, Mental Health, Inc. (legal name of corporation), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Florida (the "Corporation "); that the following is a true and correct copy of certain resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said Corporation at a meeting duly held on the 6`h day of December, 2005, at which a quorum was present; and that the following resolution is in conformity, and not in conflict, with the charter and by -laws of said Corporation and has not since been rescinded or modified. Authorized Representatives Resolved that Chairman of the Board of Trustees of David Lawrence Foundation be and is hereby granted the right to be the authorized representative of said Foundation. Further resolved, that the Executive Director of this Corporation is also hereby authorized to execute to represent said Foundation. Signatures of Officer and axe ive authorized on behalf oilthe Corporation. EXECUTIVE Lisa Merritt Carol Shaw T CIIUQCK of GOD Fl on as state Executive offices February 27, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE NO. 239.455.4637 AND FIRST -CLASS MAIL The Reverend Tony Stewart Parkway Community Church of God 5975 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 -7456 Dear Brother Stewart: Pursuant to your letter dated February 25, 2004,1 hereby concur with the selection of the following local board of trustees for the Parkway Community Church of God in Naples: Len Coley Paul Bellofatto Paul S. Dykes Pursuant to the General Assembly Minutes, S.46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, I. Selection: Each local church or congregation that owns any property (either real or personal), shall appoint a Local Board of Trustees, to consist of not less than three members, said board to be selected by the local congregation in a business meeting. DWSffh 3736 CRAGMONT DRIVE, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33619 (813) 620 -3366 53 46 w 161 p I I �_ Qj y I 9 t 40'.4 fnn'ou on•t7T in! 2 G-J�z i k tj M fi b ow III iairl ol M tOINIM -6 � ti 49 i2 �f7 J .`7 .Cd �� G ��J C.J •� � �S, sit! to V � gro AJ V �' IR� l U•, /VV /GUV./ 1.>•lo G�]4JJ0�01 ThN Du.w tPrepared By ead secure tar QQvield K. Roes, Jx., Saquire vaan, Deifik, Lanier S Rose, P.A. 1 Golden Gate Parkway, Suite 206 baPles, FL 34105 Psred ID Number•. 38165640005 Gmnrec bl TIN: Grantee q2 TIN: Warranty Deed VLL This indenture, Madethis A- t -dayof � Linda G. Allevo and Michael Allevo, wife * ** 3027578 OR: 3087 PG: 2374x MCOIDID 10 OFFICIAL RIC001 of COLLIII C00ATT, PL ORJop /2002 it 01:23AH DUCAT 1, 1ROCI, CLEM Cogs 220000.00 IBC ME 6.00 Rita: DOC -40 1610.00 UUT PISSIDOIO IT AL 2640 GMDII OATI PM 1305 Uplils FL 34105 s 2002 A.D., Between and husband of the Connry of Collier s Store of Florida , grantors, em The David Lawrence Foundation For Mental Health, Inc., a Florida Non Profit Corporation whose address is 6075 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34116 of she Comm, of Collier s stain of Florida , grantee. Witnesseth that the GRANTORS, fm and m oomidemtim ofthe sum of and ether Bond and valuable eonaidaetlon to DOLLARS ($10) ($d10 ) DOLLARS, pa by GAANTEE, the receipt whereof rs hereby acknowledged, hevc gmmed, barndncd and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRANfEP.'S heim, suxeuara and assigns f rev.,, the Rtllowing do.1,ad land, amain, lyingandbet "g'nthc Caamrof Collier snm n( Florida k, win Tract 66, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, and taxes subsequent to 2002. s i i ea _N a [7 G � � O a< is a o � a 3 z 9 4 and the grs"mry do hereby fully wan tut the tide to said lead, tad will defend the semi against lawful claims of all persom whorneca ar, In Witness Whereof fun Vacant have hencumo set their hands and seek the day sad year firer above write, iig�n%edd,, sealed and delivered in our presence: t � ni r Gah�lrn� _y� %j. e s printed Name: li.y�� L. �,•i .. (Sul) �-f .LG�'sY�'f Linda G. Ailevo N lP,O�Address: 6193 Parken Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34112 Pri ad Name: , Loldse D Emmert Michel evo — (Sol) Ni toasts S P.O. Address: 6193 Perlis" Hammock Read, Naples, M 34112 T.A,TE OF Florida 'OUNW OF collier ( �� The forcg "itg instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,inda G. Allevo and Michael Allevo, wife and husband 2001 by 'tsar callY known to me nr who hay produced their Florida dr v rrs license os;d�enb/r�n.noa ,/ JANEiLNICBEpSON _f Y ! /if A7��1� MYGOwe991oN 900 HSSSS Pr ted Name: aa,warrr/wsmwr eix,s.. to ry apin, My Cnmmission Fxph"s: rma 0va.¢dlyaa.p�„ Syalma, lnc. mm (adh NUt -5533 Pnrm eLWn.l EXHIBIT A 04/06/2005 13:16 2394556561 DLC PAGE 05 (0 Rh.wd lea IaWren' Title G,,...y F,,d. �Odendo, pe,idy �+k Bad WAIVTOn r0w14MlION 689997 1 Q4la Me& Ni 20th ese .1 Agri . GEORGE DLMUTH, TRUSTER and an an individual of Ole Carer d Collier . $n o° Florida TMi ine.amem wn% pre O?W bw. r+e..,e. Robert_. - pO�l s Jr. <nd..,. 20. rifth J&VP -- Sough NaplesF_1a ItAildn IiLRFM KSA1117i FOUNDATION, INC. , a Florida Corporation, wheee oed.9aee edd,ew. 500 Pifth Avenue South. Raples, 33940 at M Ceiiier al C011ior S' d rlorida I0.7 .7pp- ��fetw�ri�t �)pp V 1ID'i filui6 D an.a,'• ..d aftw9a . nC, WW R/anFae• i. n d e oem,M.er M a., v 0 ______________ -- ---- — ---- — -------- — ----- qyF and 00 /100 --------- --------------- bellem alMl aM.1,,,n�.wwed � .d.e►b earwd.. ae ww Wo a w.a ...e be +..a arw... .1.. ,.r p - h.r..l o hemim, Imek 's (erd. wab..ft4. at Wired ..a .w . em « W. e..+ o�...... r+w. w ..r... w»... x. Mls.3 Collier Tract 43, Golden Gate &states. Unit 030, being a S -acre aarcel. wars or less, as recorded in ,le Records or Collier R. .r ti+ IRIS Id UNIN b%MD NON- RONE&TRAD PPOPrp -rT _ qd .Na 9 w m -Aw. b.ehe hear +.ease, d,e e* b .. a e...y a.d r. d.+4..e h .4 .a enanr vhanee..r. �'.Om ^b." ww 'a.e.w• er. .,.. w. ...a.y. ".,.�wn «.w.... +wrr.♦ hl1ANMaafilRi, t,.enle. ha. l.er...nn we ewe• • +r .M rd �e .w war Hw giber. w.1nw.. grad neJM and dea.e..d m ew pewee.: Y/�!/ �y ,i GSOR$!s 0�&. 1`711, Trustee end as an ruell Isedl ._.._____•e:fi. __ ._ ._ Is.eR All of Pron;IA 2 ss P,4 11 )LINTY OF CO"ISR *VM CERTIFY that a ft. day bmfm m., an .Ia,e, duW awln+,d .. nee ...rowdye..rcr, eer.a..a, .ppt.eed GRORGS DSlIDTH, Truate4 and ad an'inOi+.Idual me hne.n b be iM een.n dmeneed in and -oe ..w,.x.d .I.a hwryarn .mn..m,nr aw os1.w..kdpM b,bre m, taw n �eeeeled.dw ,1iH S 1{,}�.mh w. owkiel wet in x.e C.." er.d gi.nr b•, mwvmbrd d d April We M IeN C.wnt., M eaeae.y Y,n• ' C�AY�I�G� f.♦M 04/06/2005 13 :16 2394556561 DLC PAGE 04 lJ DEC i_. ... , 645066 0AusPC"ailfi79 MIS 16amdo Deed at ,rd.. dr,• d.,, rrl April l n In80 1,,. GALEN E HAKES & RLA F. %MS, his wife, As .joint Tenants With T Fulj, Rights of Survivorship lrrrcow(nn rdArf rA. pnry.ror, r.. THE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION, INC. Y•lrw.. t.r,lnlri.'r a,Al.rrn i, 6075 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida 33999 lunry rnfbr raflw7 lfrr rt,wdw', •�r�....r r r u.r.r..r.•' r..t .Ni , '.,f ��/M,, r. 1�,1 rnr•.na „�r�,.r ,M.x. ..I rr...,rr•nl�i 1. '.•ur,l rM n• Mr,re • + M �...��..r:.r.� IVIhlC UI. TA., A.....nl.r.. rut ....! m .nn,ld.'munrr ..r tl..• ur a o/ $ l0. 00 errd oJwr .,olr,aA4 r,nrr ;d..anrn,,. nn.•;nt �r•A.•.Y.rl ;, hrr.rl,v a.d,.nrr•Ir.la,.,/, l..,..I „• rw.,n,. Anro.r:.,,..rrl<. oA.n,, . „. nt.ar, n•Am,r., <.ra .. anef re:I;.,.,r unr.• dr. an.ntm. nfl rLa1 rn.m �n Enid ..aunt„ br Collier Cmnvy, 1= faridn. r'ir'rv. The West 150' of Tract 50, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Rook 7. Page 58 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to restrictions, easements and reservations (including Oil, gas and mineral rights and/or leases) of record applicable thereto, and to taxes for the current year and subsequent years. 7��Ilfi wflh oil drr rrnnrnr..rl.. hondllnn,rrd, nwf nnpnn........ Ibe•n.en Aefo,.ghrg o. !n .w r.rjre an0lrMntry tng, i h�o_J%ve and to NOW rh. ,.,o. 1n 1, „n,na• rnrc.r,.. iLll{ 1hn gvIgI A,"y cwn•nann o,ftA ,old gro..trr dray rAr ar nror :. law(r,tty sefxrd of, aid fe In /aw .latpie; IlMI tho praetor Aa. goad .1PAr and Lrr..ful nwh,oit, eo olj end .on .j aranty Ar.r•A orr Bald food; that IA. y hdly .,Mot. 1ha ptle 10 .14 land and o•!71 d. IwrA A. rarer apatner the raw /u! altlrnr of on twrtaa. u.Aam.er,rer: and tAe1 ,std fond A rr.r el all rnraruhren..a., erroPI east. a fng gtWagaattt to Dettolov 71. Io 80 ,a KIM ht Ubw I tl r raid Oa,nror ho..lgard and rested tA.w Nr,on4 r dot end o. hrd rtAew written. '.trusted in ew Presence: STATE t)r FLORIDA -1 rOt;NTV t,r COLLTER .o1M14t,!aMEthe SStale A(m jd .atl �, thr Cn �n.� Manr,ujd'lo e.Y, adrwtedtorray tamorWlt aparartd GAI.EIi &. HANES and GLORIA F. HANES AIR WOW 0" Iii in'tbe Ca.rFN nrrd 77ib'91EIWaN�` 01Ffit!!A.'s'Pr &�siGritto.. ' Addaro •':i' �'� SOOFiFfR AVENUE SMb •11i LC ttrtaf.t IlIttlAdV all,(.. CY4Ia ' APd EF z 3t1 °141 aaorara a an.+a n�NrrM1 dC et 0011wry, o_ot'M wa.LI” A OR~, Lilt d daft 04/06/2005 13:16 2394556561 DLC PAGE 03 V P41179 111564 >♦i H� 18 MI Ih 16 91t $p% vyR•' �, This instrument prepared b'yP ps N ichael P. .lone,, Esq. JONES G XZL14AN. P.A. 4501 N. Taaiami Trail, /304 Naples, Florida 33940 u 2NIB IBDEETUAE, made this ae/ day of February, 1986, between WILLSAN S. RAIN and VIOLET I. BAIN, his rife, as Joint TenAats With Full Rights of Survivorship, Grantor, and THE FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL BBALTH, 3NC., Whose post office address is C/o Mr- Carl E. Waltman, 1300 3rd atreet south, #303, Naples, Florida 33940, Grantee. =22388320, that Bald Grantor, for and in consideration of the Ann of Tan Dollars (510,00), and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by Bald Grantee, the receipt Whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the fallowing described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: The Beat 180 feet of Tract 50, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the plot thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County. Florida. Subject to 4480"nts, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the currant and subsequent years. and said Orantex does hereby fully warrant the title to said lend, And Will defend the same against the lawful Claims of all persoca Whomsoever. •Grantor` and •Grantee' are used for singular and plural, Aa context requires. the dpi WZTMM X001, Grantor has set Grantor's hand and seal Y al War first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In our prasencal Jim 5C4, BAIN ORIpiAm coo OF BARASOft 1 E$RMY CERTIFY that On this day before me, an officer duly �AAIIaiAnd t* VZO'JW S BAIN, too gas known�toabe the appeared pdescriI ed z. is 'and WZto 6aeoated the foregoing t and (ay described ag ing instrument and aokngWledged ,llaferBlbRk they executed the same. aX Rand Official anal in the County and ! 6'✓Y,'iiiiid Lh� R day of February, 1986. Lam^ LZ •:� .,Ocivmen£Ory Tax .. .4t s 1hh,e�td` F�� YY�l:3:IN D.G ...at 04/13/2005 14:14 2394556561 DLC PAGE 02 1 r,PR-15-2005 12.'38 PM PARKNRY COMMUNITY CHURCH 239 455 4637 P.02 tests at ... .... ......... ...... K?#OW ALL AIM By THM rnmtm, Thal. rot and In een.ldextwn of the mum e r e A." Do .......... .. ..... ..... . coah. -at . . ....... ............. ... ....... . ..... - ... I ... .. .... . ..... . . ... . .. .... I . ............ - --------- - --- ... . ... ............. I .. . ...... 1, Inside being ashnawledged In run, And in hand P%14 to temUn by Olt 41ranlood named In Uda so4rusna4 We . ..... ARIANARGAN, ... ... ..... LEROY HAWKINS AND RAYMOND N. BtNNATT. TRUSTEES --- the SAW �two 00 ORAW. EAR09N. ML and CONVIry Now gnens", ..... . MAN JOHNSON and . ..... ......... ... ........ WARY IRtuk .. .... . ... ..... __ .. . ......... . ..... .. . . No Trage"N4 Met EMS'ItMft use Laval Board of Wnsaw, of the 13110"ll OValod at.,Aq?�!n Gate ... -Call far ........ . .. ... . ...... ..... ..... coanty, , Florida., WIN following dearribel lands lying, being and matumad. in . ...... ... ... .. . county, florida., dawriverk AN folloorat vix: Tract 59, Unit M, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES according to plat thereof recorded In Plat Book 7, page 68, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT to settlements, restrictions and VVISer-yAtIalftl Of record, TO Have A3WT0 RMM onto the BRIAN JOHNSON ....... ..... —. are Tfthta and 9OWW'drififf the 1,4011 90fird 91 TnWAR at the o1wesh of Odd at. ...!-QOJ.dSn Gdts County, —T] AM to their someamm, in treat, And Asaign, And nub. lost alone to Life ronawwor linamwona: The sales Loco amid at Trumm shan bass veto fe, Inagag, and contrpi the sold ", "at, for the 8" AN. =d wndflt Of ins church at Odd, having Its sartorial ImAthimurlim in c ami T"mistarea, 664 ftf the 1*111dular use: and benefit Of the 1=91 CQr4&Wti= Of the tad Charon 1210 0101 poom ... I Florida — was' a ode O"Mm soo" am aaaMa at"Ww"I., a"Ift—A. train NOM = A W." ftwh IN vM Mey.y a M..m difteefli Aaeevlf ON, 011MM'oh 4 ".4 WA .4 d. =a And NIi to, in .. . ... ....... helm fill"OhIto Add adoolni'ttt"M "Want Itb %h. mid Add Trustees, 654 amakibeflier the tow ElMd of Tramose at she Cidedh of ood at -Soldon Gate in County, their succeeding in treat and amjeenj that We Are .- ........... ........ .... ............. ....... hLIF11117 sehardt in goo dedifle of sold prettiest; that they an ima fron, all and that !t - — have a good 919115 " 1111 and Convoy the am' " ata"Nald: that we halt', "Ne"nong and A411111411121LUM 111411 Vft=nt and defend WA "VIA 60 the mid BRIAN JOHNSON .... --- - ------- -, And HARRY Cr S Tyrel"N", And WILStillittlylil teak LOCO RUM of Trustees of the Oburalt of Odd at DATE I A Collier - I.- giadaty' their mate"Nov, in rru4 and the Itwfml someone. Italian forever, agaknst In Vinton Whereof — have harevento at... Oqr,,, hand i and sal ,S... M title the 01q, day of Fe 6 .. is willyma on stratiturar! A R �'MDRGA)f 8ZAL, (lndtMMOro1�—W, dad Newt be gigncd mkdOoje4gtd and repigpteft ialtAL, the pmverty is lasted. I I a in astardanc@ with the IN.& of the seats whom 0 state F1oMdd i . .. ... ...... 1paullaw I a In and .. ......... . —T."TEIS for aw county, in add staw ziervoy actusy that U%M4 5. ligaed to the foreheads Coaveylace. and who ...are...... known to me, RgknoWJokod being rm on thij day. IgS WhV'RfOrmal of Lbs wrAgna, of the cowveyun -.awuw the same Voluntarily " the d" me send Kean d* 01"h mad" my steel And teal, thin the day of .... . .. . ...... . elp- A& IyiO W7 6INE", rotate of .— .... .... . ... ........... . ---- I-- I .. ..... .... . --1-- � Couty a ------- .......... . ....... ... is And r0V MW CO%Mtr, III AM Idatt, do hereby cwtib Mat Ad the day Of L . ........ 19.,. "Me b-fm me the via" owed . ...... . ...... tufted to me (a am* kuQwQ to MCI to be the wift of the wahla. a-, It ---- .. . ........ .. . ...... . . . .... .. ...... ............. who Was asatellowl jepm§4 and apart tram the klushand, t"Ourn het 01platitra to the wtialve -- . I I AdISIDWIffted that She Algand We same Of bet' OSIa Im will gad Accord, and without feu, qgatraint, = thmt, W the part 91 the budhWad. 10 wrlmen whereof. I lion herfusitc, Art my hand Ohio ,..._.__day aff... ....... . .. — ...... 1 .19 ratate ollklax find) 20-d LVSIO nnv 62Z HnanHo A-LINnWWOO AUPTNaUcl Wa 82:zl 5082 —FS -21 dJly 01 At state F1oMdd i . .. ... ...... 1paullaw I a In and .. ......... . —T."TEIS for aw county, in add staw ziervoy actusy that U%M4 5. ligaed to the foreheads Coaveylace. and who ...are...... known to me, RgknoWJokod being rm on thij day. IgS WhV'RfOrmal of Lbs wrAgna, of the cowveyun -.awuw the same Voluntarily " the d" me send Kean d* 01"h mad" my steel And teal, thin the day of .... . .. . ...... . elp- A& IyiO W7 6INE", rotate of .— .... .... . ... ........... . ---- I-- I .. ..... .... . --1-- � Couty a ------- .......... . ....... ... is And r0V MW CO%Mtr, III AM Idatt, do hereby cwtib Mat Ad the day Of L . ........ 19.,. "Me b-fm me the via" owed . ...... . ...... tufted to me (a am* kuQwQ to MCI to be the wift of the wahla. a-, It ---- .. . ........ .. . ...... . . . .... .. ...... ............. who Was asatellowl jepm§4 and apart tram the klushand, t"Ourn het 01platitra to the wtialve -- . I I AdISIDWIffted that She Algand We same Of bet' OSIa Im will gad Accord, and without feu, qgatraint, = thmt, W the part 91 the budhWad. 10 wrlmen whereof. I lion herfusitc, Art my hand Ohio ,..._.__day aff... ....... . .. — ...... 1 .19 ratate ollklax find) 20-d LVSIO nnv 62Z HnanHo A-LINnWWOO AUPTNaUcl Wa 82:zl 5082 —FS -21 dJly 01 F1oMdd i . .. ... ...... 1paullaw I a In and .. ......... . —T."TEIS for aw county, in add staw ziervoy actusy that U%M4 5. ligaed to the foreheads Coaveylace. and who ...are...... known to me, RgknoWJokod being rm on thij day. IgS WhV'RfOrmal of Lbs wrAgna, of the cowveyun -.awuw the same Voluntarily " the d" me send Kean d* 01"h mad" my steel And teal, thin the day of .... . .. . ...... . elp- A& IyiO W7 6INE", rotate of .— .... .... . ... ........... . ---- I-- I .. ..... .... . --1-- � Couty a ------- .......... . ....... ... is And r0V MW CO%Mtr, III AM Idatt, do hereby cwtib Mat Ad the day Of L . ........ 19.,. "Me b-fm me the via" owed . ...... . ...... tufted to me (a am* kuQwQ to MCI to be the wift of the wahla. a-, It ---- .. . ........ .. . ...... . . . .... .. ...... ............. who Was asatellowl jepm§4 and apart tram the klushand, t"Ourn het 01platitra to the wtialve -- . I I AdISIDWIffted that She Algand We same Of bet' OSIa Im will gad Accord, and without feu, qgatraint, = thmt, W the part 91 the budhWad. 10 wrlmen whereof. I lion herfusitc, Art my hand Ohio ,..._.__day aff... ....... . .. — ...... 1 .19 ratate ollklax find) 20-d LVSIO nnv 62Z HnanHo A-LINnWWOO AUPTNaUcl Wa 82:zl 5082 —FS -21 dJly EXHIBIT B Amend page 5 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to add the following: Policy 1.12 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: ESTATES — MIXED USE DISTRICT a. Residential Estates Subdistrict b. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict c. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict d. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict e. Conditional Use Subdistrict f. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay g. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill District h Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Amend page 42 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as follows: Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above- defined segment shall be approved for conditional uses. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. Amend page 45 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to add the following: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: 1. Churches and other places of worship. 2. Group care facilities (Categories I and II). 3. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities. 4. Essential services as set forth in LDC Section 2.01.03. 5. Private Schools. 5I a8 151091 Ver051- MPERRY n N01 5S01 1 006 PLOP -29]10 6. Day care centers. 1. Libraries. 2. Government offices. 3. Medical offices associated with group care facilities. 4. Civic and cultural facilities. 5281200b 151091 Ver: 051- MPERRY N015i011 -WO- PCOP- 29249 PROPOSED AMENDMENT hAmitsIT G -- -Jl LeeeNO � 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA ® XTL„ J u _,, ❑ ,E EI. I ,PE. FUTURE LAND USE MAP E: NAPLES IMMOKAI. BE BO E) LI LII II - AEA;WP, .a P11 11 JCI'iLA' S. R.8A 1C.MMEllionn�ols ami xC A c P ❑ 5 T JESL B ^r NIJy dA�ll _ c O TA C M *nou > OIL WELL ROAD m C ❑ CCMMERC �Ae ABC�S'L+LCi 'OUVEfIWIAi �IgCLST " RARBALL BOLLEVARC o - 9 I ❑ ..PBP.i GESiGErv'iA,_ ■ [GMln�E �f::li, i10.`augGLi�L:E o i DOYLffAGAL 8UB818TIYCT ■ 3.1N9P�y I ",A, E.LLIN GATE PARKWAY ASTI VTIONPL RANDALL BOCLEYARD !9 CCM M� OP'_ SMBpSLP'C' SIIBJISiRIC1 ri L 'PALM ® IC I eoLcex cLTe L ' umRL uro uec MsR v m O GOLDEN OATS ElFE11 L, DAVIS BOULEVARDr COMNPCYL JCI'iLA' S. R.8A xC A c P ❑ 5 T JESL B ^r NIJy dA�ll _ c O '� C M *nou > OIL WELL ROAD m C 1 C W JE 111C111 Cry . ME-. T, : d .L M - I'll ET ER P L P X J Rx:T Vl RARBALL BOLLEVARC o - 9 I S. i NAPLES IMMOKALEE ROAD o i DOYLffAGAL 8UB818TIYCT ,n z RANDALL BOCLEYARD !9 DAVIS BOULEVARDr COMNPCYL S. R.8A WILLRNRCIMTt[8 O '� Rx:T Vl RARBALL BOLLEVARC o m S. i o i DOYLffAGAL 8UB818TIYCT ,n VANDERBILT !9 BEACH ROAD ri Q I eoLcex cLTe L ' umRL uro uec MsR v m O GOLDEN OATS ULEVARD L, t V PIN RIDGE RD. WHITE BLVD. UI -- y 5 L PIX[ RWO[ ROPO I � L � m MIMO YOE � F 6 R AX CORLLIRCIALM ,�• F RMROIRLRWi m L p Q GG.'YKWY. 3 p i DAVIS BOULEVARDr S. R.8A 2 0 Vl �. o m S. m o i m ,n !9 s, Tq Q I eoLcex cLTe L ' umRL uro uec MsR L, EXHIBIT D ZONED: ESTATES I SINGLE FAMILY UNIT 30 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES HOMES 28TH AVENUE S.W. PROJECT LOCATION SINGLE FAMILY 5pp SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPERTY HOMES ZONED: (DEVELOPED) RADIUS (DEVELOPED) ESTATES 29TH AVE S.W. PKWY w . 0 DAVID SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY LAWRENCE COMM. < z VACANT ¢ w SIN LE FAMILY HOMES HOMES CENTER CHURCH w m m HOMES (DEVELOPED) DEVELOPED) OF GOD J = W J J (D VELOPED) U Z Q U) 1z GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (C.R. 886) SINGLE g O w = SINGLE FAMILY U) FAMILY U U z m HOMES ¢ HOMES = Q — S 0 m: (DEVELOPED) ¢ Q (DEVELOPED) w F ¢ U U ZU w(n ~Z Of J= = o Y ZONED: U N Y a ESTATES as v SINGLE FAMILY OLL to HOMES o (DEVELOPED) � u In ZONED: �2 1- F ESTATES 2 o F ¢ 0 W U In FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION = I GOLDEN GATE ESTATES PROJECT: GOLDEN GATE PKWY. INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT GENERAL LOCATION MAP /FLUE DESIGNATION j CLIENT: THE DAVID LAWRENCE FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC. ' ■ ■ athonraxr, mv.. alerKmaraMnolvaiwlau wil*m er Ecn�E 1.. - 50 onre 4/29/05 SEC iWP R '. GE'. REV NO'. Planners •Engineers • Ecologists •Surveyors • Landscape Architects • Trsnaponatbn Consultants PROJECT NO NEMP 55-011 -000 INOE% NO. A-p,55 -pa WilsonMiller,lnc. pRWN BYIEMP NO. KAC/1213 SHEET NO' 1 Or 1 32008sihy/ane, Suih,200• Naples, Floritla34105-6567• Phone 239-649-4646• Fax 239- 263 -6494• WeMS6e wvw.wihoamilercom 3 an a k �� 0 mN X co mn Q 0 vZC� s�o 0� iti c ma m M� mn C n n 3 mv i r 40 cv �m OZ Z Gi as Nm w D a 65 � Xa 1 114 Perods Fine 9sd. m m -NyCrb C� Prow BMW" mpmdnwe) N GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY A INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT NRCS SOILS MAP EXHIBIT G papered by V. PebGmp 04104M X;rNYroorF 10155MRCS Soft h p Ir.DrvNb Project GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT Clierk DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER Project M: N0155,0114)00-ZOPAS Sect. 29, Twp. 49S, Rng. 2SE, Collier Cou ty, _ ( b r ; ■ %E :§ §2B /)7 2 <0 ;2] : - 0 00 mm aww ;\o _.E! <�� -- _,T §:. °« !!%!rezz&M )))wog) \j \\ )!) 00000 f0 §00 §�§ 00 k)))k) �\ CL 0 }B - zz §2 w� :woo z z z ! ! z !2 2§ zzzz2z age ®zz ie r q § t § Z))Zzz www wee \w �� § f) O.L o !l 2�!�)� 0 _ - )§E;O - - �0 2 §) § ;5.9 ) \ j ; ` ({ \7/ )}\ tT G± r ; ■ %E :§ §2B /)7 2 <0 ;2] : - 0 00 mm aww ;\o _.E! <�� -- _,T §:. °« !!%!rezz&M )))wog) \j \\ )!) Exhibit - H1 Listed Species Survey — Log of Time Spent On Site te Hours Conditions 2006 6:45 am — 10:45 am Cloud , 70° F, Calm winds 4:00 m — 8:00 m Cloud , 87° F, Winds 0 - 5 m h R5/2312006 2006 6:30 am — 10:00 am Partl cloud , 72° F, Winds 0 - 5 m h 2006 4:00 m — 8:00 m Part] cloud 88° F, Winds 5 -10 m h 2006 6:35 am — 10:05 am Cloud , 80° F, Calm winds Hours 19.2 WilsonMiller ecologist Curt Schaeffer performed a listed species survey on the subject property from May 22 through May 26, 2006. Prior to field investigations, color aerials were reviewed to identify the various vegetative communities present on the site. Based on the vegetative habitats identified and a literatures search, a preliminary list of state and federally listed flora and fauna that have the potential to occur on the site was determined. Exhibit H contains the preliminary list of listed plants and animals that have the potential to occur on the site. Meandering pedestrian transects were performed throughout the property searching for listed flora and fauna. The field ecologist was equipped with binoculars, compass, aerials, wildlife and plant identification books, and field notebooks for documentary purposes. During transects, the ecologist periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations and sounds. These survey methodologies were consistent with those prescribed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC 1988 Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval. FWC. Tallahassee, FL). FWC's publication Florida's Endangered Species Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern 29 January 2004 was used to determine the current state and federal status of listed wildlife and plant species. 9 W2'0- 170798 Ve[021 -TKING N015S011 -001..0 arty �r Nib Rt I iii . IN ■ iii � , 4 qw, ei! 14 A4 r A. tv FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES April 12, 2005 Toni King WilsoaMiller, [no. 3200 Bailey Lane Naples, FL 34105 FAX #; 239- 643 -5716 EXHIBIT I P.01 Dear Ms. King: In response to your inquiry of April 11, 2005, the Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources within the following parcel: T49S R26E, Section 29. In interpreting the results of our search, please remember the following points: Areas which have not been completely surveyed, such as yours, may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, unrecorded historically important structures, or both. As you may know, state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some projects. Record searches by the staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute such a review of cultural resources. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance Review Section of the Bureau of Historic Preservation at 850- 245 -6333 or at this address. Sincerely, Wm. Gerald L, Brinkley Archaeological Data Analyst, Florida Master Site File Division of Historical Resources R A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 Phone 850- 245 -6440, Fax: $50 -245 -6439 State SunCom: 205 -6440 Email: fmsflle@ dos.state fl.us Web: http : / /Www.dos.statefl.taldhrlmsfl 500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 • http: / /Www.flheritage.com ❑ Director's Office ❑ Archaeoiogieal Research O Historic Fre walion 0 Historkal Museums (950) 2456300 • FAX: 245.6435 (850) 245.64" • FAX: 24564M (850) 74563M • FAX: 245 -64,37 (850) 2456400 • FAX: 2454433 ave,h aegionsl Office O St. Augustine Regional Office 0 Tampa Regional Office 0^c -5nn5 - FAX: 8255044 (813) 2723843 • FAX: 272.2340 EXHIBIT J RNG 261 RNG 27 ® INDICATES AREAS OF HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY INDICATES HISTORIC STRUCTURE (NOT TO SCALE) INDICATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (NOT TO SCALE) L.� INDICATES HISTORIC DISTRICT uoew.o+o a /n /u cowm caxnr fora uxa r�wxwo ourw�unrt PWP 4E PWP 49 1" -4700• FP 49 IP 50 BELLE MEADE NW QUADRANGLE AREAS OF MTOICA /ARCHAEO OGICA PRUABI ITY O r r� ;�r•, EXHIBIT K GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES As this application does not modify the existing zoning of the parcels, there are no additional impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) for potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, or parks associated with this application. Due to the relatively small size of the proposed subdistrict and the fact that a majority of the area is currently developed, any future development or changes to the zoning of the properties are anticipated to have minimal impacts on public facilities. Services The properties are within the Florida Government Utility Authority (FGUA) water and wastewater service area. See copy of request for availability of service letter to FGUA and utility location map. Solid Waste services are provided by Waste Management, Inc. See copy of request for availability of service letter to Waste Management. As this application proposes no increase in residential density, no additional demands for schools or community /regional parks are anticipated. Any future development or changes to the zoning of the properties are anticipated to have minimal impacts on fire protection or emergency medical services. Drainage The proposed subdistrict is in Flood Zone X, see FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map. There are no known drainage problems associated with the property and any future development will comply with the current Collier County ordinances. Other The project is not in the vicinity of any well fields, High Noise Contours, the traffic congestion boundary, or the Coastal Management Boundary. The applicant intends to commence built -out construction immediately upon issuance of the necessary permits. 5/26200& 150992 ve,: 021 JeRG N015S01 I-0 0 Impacts to Level of Service for County provided public facilities Category Existing LOS Impact from this Application Potable Water 185 gal. per capita per day None, not in Collier County Service Area Sanitary Sewer 100 gal. per capita per day None, not in Collier County Service Area Drainage water quantity and quality standards None as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74 -50 and 90 -10. Solid Waste Two years of lined cell capacity None. Service Provider is reflecting the ISWM strategy; Collier County Solid Waste proposed methodology of average Management tons per capita disposal rate of the previous 3 years Ten years of permissible landfill reflecting ISWM strategy; proposed methodology of average tons per capita disposal rate of the previous 3 ears. Regional Parks 2.9412 acres per 1,000 /pop. None, no increase in residential density Community Parks 1.2882 acres per 1,000 /pop. None, no increase in residential density Recreational Facilities $240.00 capital investment per capita None, no increase in residential density County Jail 2.4 beds per 1,000 /pop. None, no increase in residential density County Emergency 1 EMS unit per 15,000 /pop. None, no increase in Medical Service residential density fr! &2000 -150902 Ve[021 -JBRMN N015"II -M- - -9 • ,,,, - w a +� k✓" 41 R4Y Ar low i { e i 1, y et J • 5 t ' x 4 i_ Y z } A , r `y, , rl t4 It 4 J 2 tl Y t Y tltl ~ J t ° j f yy r^ PROJECT: GOLDEN GATE PKWY. INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT UTILITIES LOCATION EXHIBIT _NT: DAVID LAWRENCE FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH, INC. .. �k= EXHIBIT M Wilsmmiller scuE: 1" = 200' on *E'.04/18/05 v SEC'. 1WP: RGE: REV NO. Pk . Eve - Ecobgmb - Srnym - LandecVe Archdecb - Trw*p takn CoINAWO 29 49 26E ERCQECT NO. NDEC NO: WdsorM&r,, N1C. N0155- 011 -000 n- 0155 -09 DRWN B /EMP N6 SHEET NO .'YJM n.aw Ww .9iw N» . NaDM Rvifi.'NIkS -0.5]. PMVw Yi9- eGFIOIO. FBI TN95t -5®C . WM -.qM wwWri'mie!Et1m .... /.. �. . �� Mr. Bill Focht Florida Government Utility Authority 12355 Collier Boulevard Suite C Naples, FL 34116 Subject: David Lawrence Center— Expansion of Existing Facilities Water and Wastewater Service Availability Request Dear Mr. Focht: This letter is to follow up on our conversations earlier in the week regarding our request for a letter of availability for water and wastewater for the proposed project. It is our understanding that you have forwarded our request on to your Orlando office and will forward their response upon receipt. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Inc. Yro6P.E. Manager Enc. C: Scott Geltemeyer, David Lawrence Center, wto enclosures Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 Hapless Oorparafe OlOee 3260 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 • Naples, Florida 34105 • 239.649.4040 - Fax239643.5716 ersvmae Irom v :on -Lwarw wllsaamillercom ewl wwalwoo o W /IsonMlller, Inc. — FL L1C.1 LC- CW0I7a *7180nMiller New Directions In Planning, Design 8 Engineenng EXHIBIT N April 14, 2005 Ms. Lisa Tomasch Florida Government Utility Authority 12355 Collier Boulevard Suite C Naples, FL 34116 Subject: David Lawrence Center— Expansion of Existing Facilities Water and Wastewater Service Availability Request Dear Ms. Tomasch: This is to request a letter of availability for water and wastewater pertaining to the proposed project. One copy of the location map and site map has been enclosed for your review. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, JaredX.. Bfwn, P.E. Project Manager Enc. C: Scott Gettemeyer, David Lawrence Center, w/o enclosures Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 Naples Corporate OOlce 3200 Bailey lane, Suite 200 • Naples, Flonda 34105. 239.649.4D4D • Fax 239 643 5716 aurzaos isoaev vv ou- unaanN wllsonm111er. com NO155- 011 -ce0 - -0 fl wmler New Directions In Planning; Design & Fneinwrinp EXHIBIT O April 14, 2005 Mr. George Yilmaz Collier County Solid Waste Management 3301 Tamiami Trail East Building H Naples, FL 34112 Subject: David Lawrence Center — Expansion of Existing Facilities Service Availability Request Dear Mr. Yilmaz: This is to request a letter of availability pertaining to the proposed project. One copy of the location map and site map has been enclosed for your review. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, �V/� . Brown, P.E. Manager Enc. C: Scott Geltemeyer, David Lawrence Center, w/o enclosures Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 NaplesXaMorate Office 3200 Bailey lane, Suite 200 • Naples, Florida 34105. 239.649.4040 • Fax 239.6435716 4/112 1s 7 V 011 -Marra wlrsonn7111er. cem N015 N0155- 011-000 -0 EXHIBIT Q Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Statement BACKGROUND The intent of the Growth Management Plan Amendment is to permit the future expansion of both the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God, provide flexibility for future use of the property, and at the same time provide compliance with current LDC requirements for the preservation of native vegetation and for the treatment and storage of stormwater on the site(s). Because a substantial portion of the vacant 5 acre site (on the east side of the church site and owned by the David Lawrence Center) will be used for the preservation of native vegetation and stormwater management, the applicant has estimated that the net increase in building area associated with this request will be approximately 20,000 square feet of clinical /office /institutional space, located either on the existing David Lawrence Center site, on the vacant tract, on the church property, or partially on portions of the property. Since this is a Growth Management Plan Amendment to add a "subdistrict" to the existing Plan, specific to these parcels, the change being requested, by itself does not modify the underlying (existing) zoning of the tract(s) and therefore does not create any additional traffic impact. The Plan Amendment will allow for a future rezoning (or conditional use) application to entitle the vacant 5 -acre tract with appropriate uses. At that time, and at subsequent site development application stages of the review process, more detailed traffic impact analysis will be required. As part of this GMP Amendment application, a trip generation comparison of the existing zoning and the proposed land use (increase floor area) is provided below as a measure of the GMP Amendment's impact on the adjacent roadway system. The subject parcels are not within the Traffic Congestion Boundary area as identified on the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Map. LEVEL OF SERVICE The subject site is directly adjacent to the segment of Golden Gate Parkway identified in the 2004 Annual Update and Inventory report (AUIR) from 1 -75 to Santa Barbara, as having an adopted Minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standard of "E ". In 2004, the peak hour capacity of the facility (with a 6- lanes) was rated at 3,730 with a current volume of 2070, yielding an operating LOS of "C ". TRIP GENERATION The existing developed tracts occupied by the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God are established by Conditional Use approval and can expand within the limits of their existing approved zoning. Land taken for the expansion of Golden Gate Parkway and /or the 1 -75 Interchange, have reduced the net usable land area of the parcels and _ have eliminated native vegetation areas previously counted toward the minimum requirements for the site. Establishing a GMP subdistrict for the existing developed parcels plus an additional +/- 5 -acre adjacent parcel will allow for the recovery of native vegetation (lost to the new roadway projects) plus provide for needed stormwater management areas for the site(s). Absent any change in the GMP and zoning on the additional two -acre site, two single - family homes could be constructed on the parcel. Two single - family homes will generate approximately 2 p.m. peak hour trips on the adjacent roadways. Assuming a 20,000 square foot expansion of the David Lawrence Center, the ITE Trip Generation Handbook indicates that approximately 35 p.m. peak hour trips would be generated for a LU #715 Single Use Tenant Office Building. The types of professional services that would generally be in a separate building located on the additional tract would most likely be administrative office or similar institutional use. Assuming a 60/40 split of the trips, by west/east direction, the resulting p.m. peak hour traffic impact of the additional floor area described above would be considered de minimis, and would have no impact on the operational LOS of Golden Gate Parkway. As currently permitted, the Church may expand in the future within the limits of their existing zoning (or as may be modified in a subsequent zoning application), and therefore there is no additional impact being generated by this GMP amendment. ACCESS MANAGEMENT No special access management considerations are being requested as part of this GMP Amendment. This amendment does not preclude the potential for cross - access agreements that would facilitate the sharing of existing or potentially future access points, thus improving access and site circulation, Pursuant to the Land Development Code, access management issues will be dealt with as part of any subsequent SDP application. 2 For: Minutes & Records This packet goes behind CP- 2005 -6 Staff Report tab after the staff report. Ready to insert as is. . . . . Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. T7ownsend cific project(s) objected to are checked below: O David Lawrence Center VColonnade Sincerely, Name Address 2-12-07; 3:03PM;CC TAX COLLECTOR ;2397935595 # 1T t Ms. Michele AKP,' Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive. Naples FL341'!0'4 .-' Please register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5,2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: x"Townsend 0 David Lawrence Center �lonnade Sincerely, Name -9 )O)Yr,A , A) LE Address S�,) February 19, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, A1CP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca@Colliergov.net From: Property Owner across the pkwy: 3115 701i St. SW, Naples, Florida Please register my strong objection and my position as a property owner across the street and that will be directly adversely affected by any change to the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan. l am against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. This pacific NF corner of Golden Gate and Livingston will increase traffic and detract from my view. If, when myself or a family member were to live at the parcel directly across the street from the development my view and tenants views of my house would be an invasion! When 1 choose to build a residence for myself or a family member the value of the atmosphere of the lot and the cash value would he decreased as a result of a commercial development across the street. My property would lose value due to other parcels being sliced off and developed by big dollar developers. This area would be, just another commercial development versus the unique appeal it currently has as close in estate homes with acreage and horse property. The are would not be the jewel it is and it would not fit for residential use. My property would be greatly effected if this parcel and others go commercial on golden gate parkway, which will happen if you let this except get the ball rolling to big money! The specific project objected to is the Townsend project at the NE comer at Golden Gate and Livingston. However, also object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. �. S' ercly, 1 nn E. eT ant Property in Question: 3115 701i Street SW,Naples, Florida Residence: 2910 70'h Street S W,Naples, Florida Coll: 239 - 269 -1950 8£0/£00'd 010# 091 L00310WO £Ob9£696£Z 031IWIlNA SIOVS180H 18VWS:moad rop 10 u/ vi:up uvopl errant Feb 19 07 10239 William M Grant yam'• t' • e al .ce. •:w lc February 19.2007 Ms, h 011410 Mom, AICP Principal Planner Commbaasive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Fl. 34104 Moor 239403 -2400 eat, 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mall, hdicbele MosusecollierrvZot Fromm: Goldeu Gift Pkwyp gnrty owner 6910 Golder Gate Pwky, Naples, Florida LJJ -41 Id -1141 p.l 1,e�s- vur -wvo p" 02/19/2007 13:57 AW1 P.001/001 Plwse rogiater my Objecliom and my position as a property owner that will be directly adversely affecled by any change to the existing policy 5.2.3 of Golden Cratt Master Plan. h am against any changes that would allow new tom atrial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingstonn Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Timis will reduce the aceeraibility to sty lot whom i choose to build a resi&nce due to increased traffic. Any Commercial develmpment will increase and slow trafrmL MY Property would lose value due tc other f outage percela being sticed of and developed by big dollar developers. Tbis sea would be just another menmarcial ship center sod not fit for residential use. The apeeiiic project objwbsd to is the Townsend project at ire NE comer at holden Gate and Livingston. 1 object to say Commercial DevdoptMOt on Golden Gets Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, shemldbe adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects ousrandy being dwsloped an Pine Ridge, Scrota Barbara and Radio Reads to support this community. Sinoeral r r Will. am . Grant Property is Question: 6910 Golden Gab pkWY Naples. Florida Reaiderwa; 102 North Harvard Blvd, Loa wagWM Ca 90004 Cell: 213- 3094000 Rx time:02 /19/2007 14:12 8£0 /h00 -d 010# 091 LOOZIOZ /ZO Rx No.:994 P -001 £OPSC696£Z 031INIINA SIOVO18ON 18VNS:moaj February 13, 2007 5881 Golder Gate Parkway Naples, Fl. 34116 Dear Ms. Moses, I am attaching this letter to the form registering my objection to the Planning Commission Approval to Policy 5.23 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. First, may I preface my remarks with a sense of pessimism and defeat because I am old enough to know and have seer that the commercial interests will prevail regardless of the justice or rightness of the cause. Nevertheless, I shall voice my objections without any doubt as to the outcome; as I would feel that my rights as a citizen were abrogated were I not to express my objections. Second: The character of the Parkway currently has a semblance of tranquility with modest housing on ample lots with many trees, shrubs and typical Florida growth. It gives a sense of openness, space indicating that people five in this area. In the late afternoon the school buses stop along the street and children disembark who resides along the intersecting sweets, from 70+ to 5816_ There are no stores or business establishments competing for customers and increasing the stop and go How of traffic. Third: the present occupants of various establishments along the Parkway are churches and day care canters, and a bridge chub. The David Lawrence Center has the appearance of a residential facility much like facili ties where seniors are cared for. The Center blends in well with the houses, churches and community ambience- Fourth ' I suggest you look at streets like Davis, Radio, Pine Ridge, that have been transformed from settings of quiet neighborhoods on the outskirts of Naples with residential enclaves to contntercialined aver -built stores and offices dominating their sections of the area. Alone particularly attractive and all destroying the simplicity of formerly convenient roadway that was unencumbered with commercial establishments. I hope and pray you and the Commission will listen to my objection as a resident who has loved the environment of this area and the gracious appearance of the Parkway as it is now. Yours truly, Herbert Hoover Herman Feb 09 07 02:03p Karl Ehlers To Michele Mosca From Mr. & Mrs. Karl Ehlers 2695 64® St. Sw Naples Fl 34105 & 2675 6e St SW 239 261 -4921 P1 Dear Michele We have been residents here on 64'" St. SW for 32 years. In that time many attempts to commercialize the real estate along Golden Gate Pkwy. have been proposed and have failed. The reason is still the same! The people who live here don't want it. You people in the planning dept ought to be ashamed at what you are doing to the area The new developments on Livingston Rd are ridiculous. The houses are to close and the density too high for the infrastructure. Pine Ridge Rd is a nightmare already and Golden Gate parkway will be the same in a very short time. Just Say No To the Developers No Commercialization of Golden Gate Pkwy! Thank You I 1 Gail Ehlers Message Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: peter waltbillig [pwaltbillig @swfla.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:19 AM To: MoscaMichele Subject: COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPART - -- GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY REZONING ISSUES Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Ms. Mosca I live at 2901 70th Street; (since 1974). 1 was aware of the "zoning and planning" issues at that time -- basically there were challenges to the residential zoning, but there has been a history of strong indications from your office over the years that the Golden Gate "corridor' would remain a residential area, and would not convert to commercial use. This area was planned for Residential and should continue to be Residential. Please register my objection to Planning Commission Approval of any changes to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd, This was and should continue to be a Residential Community. This area of Collier County has ample Commercial zoned /usable land available. There is no need to have this area converted to commercial usage other than for the personal wealth of some land owners. It is not in the good of the community. Peter and Linda Waltbillig 2901 70th Street 262 -2776 2/26/2007 Page 1 of I MoscaMichele From: Frances B. Stephan [fstephan@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:45 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: rezoning GG parkway Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Michele Mosca, Principal planner Please register our objection to change policy 5.2.3. of the Golden Gate Master plan to allow commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. We are specifically in objection to the Townsend project. The Townsend family was well aware of the local when they bought the property and the master plan should not be changed sorely for their benefit. We are next door to their property and are well aware of the noise problem. We have lived there for 23 years, raised our children, and watched the county grow. Adding more traffic via commercial buildings along the parkway is certainly not going to help, in fact it will only add to the noise and traffic. There is a lot of wildlife in the area mainly because of the large residential yards. Just this month 1 have seen Great Horned Owls, Pileated Woodpeckers, Downy woodpeckers and a Fox Squirrel, among the more common song birds and animals. We all strive to keep our neighborhood pleasant and a wonderful place to raise children. If the Collier County Commission would like to keep fine decent contributing families in Collier County, then our neighborhoods need to be protected. Please, do not change the policy for the benefit of a few while the rest of us strive to maintain an enviable standard of life. Thank you very much, Francie Stephan and Paul Stephan 2955 701h St SW Naples FL 34105 239 - 263 -2813 2/23/2007 Townsend Request.txt To whom It May Concern: Re Townsend Request On Monday, January 22, we attended a meeting hosted by agents of a Mr. Joseph Townsend, who owns a five acre lot on the northeast corner of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway. Mr. Townsend wants to rezone the property to allow for commercial development. The county currently has a policy which prohibits further commercial development on Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The meeting was attended by a smattering of home- owners from the immediate area as well as representatives from Golden Gate Civic Association and wyndemere. A few speculators, who have bought land on the Golden Gate corridor, also attended the meeting. The speculators supported Mr. Townsend's request, claiming that economic forces dictated the inevitability of commercial development along the corridor. The home - owners generally were not in favor of his request, supporting existing policy and citing increased traffic concerns. we were initially sympathetic to the plight of the owner. The land in question lies on a corner of two three -lane feeder roads, and has become less desirable as residential property. If the owner had resided on the property when it was definitely rural, with only a two -lane road abutting, we felt that 'progress' had dealt him a bad hand. However, when we checked the Tax Assessor's web site, we found that Mr. Townsend purchased the property in 2003. At that date he surely was aware of what was in store for Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway. our sympathy for Mr. Townsend's position was modified. Commercialization of the Golden Gate corridor from Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard has implications for more interests than just the home - owners in the immediate area. It is the gateway to the City of Naples when the Golden Gate I -75 interchange is opened. we strongly urge you to preserve the existing non - commercialization policy and reject Mr. Townsend's proposal. Richard and Valerie Hafely 2790 66th st sw Naples, FL 34105 Page 1 Zi Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: joan @kilbournassociates.com Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:11 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Golden Gate Parkway at Livingston Road Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Attn: Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP From: Joan S. Gardner, resident of 70th Street SW Re: Golden Gate Parkway Corridor Plan Dear Ms. Mosca, My husband and I bought our home on 70th Street SW 17 years ago because it was a quiet residential neighborhood with a sizeable lot. Over the years, much has changed - primarily the completion of Livingston Road which abuts our property. We now hear trucks and homs and motorcycles in our back yard - but, still, understand and appreciate that Livingston Road serves some good and improved purposes. We expressed concern when, recently, the left turn lane onto 70th Street SW was eradicated. This forces us to drive to 68th Street SW and make a dangerous U -turn into traffic - just to get back to our "quiet, dead -end street' and home. Cars speed down Golden Gate Parkway, coming off the hill over 1 -75. Very soon, the new 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway will be open - allowing more traffic to speed down Golden Gate Parkway - making our daily drive more dangerous than ever. Truly, this area is "an accident waiting to happen." Since the Comprehensive Planning Department has NOT listened to what we, the citizens of this area, really want, I am hopeful that at least you can stop any commercial development from our residential neighborhood. No development of a 40,000 sq.ft. office building in a residential -zoned area: 5 acres at the NE corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road. (Is this being referred to as the Townsend property?) We do not want/need any more added traffic. For safety and because of the existing policies (restricting any more commercial zoning), do not allow any further commercialization of Golden Gate Parkway. I would be happy to hear back from you, but am doubtful. As I said, the City Planners do not seem to listen /care about what we think. Sincerely, Joan S. Gardner 2639 70th Street SW Naples, FL 34105 2/26/2007 Page 1 of 1 2" MoscaMichele From: chstealth @aol.com Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 8:56 AM To: MoscaMichele Cc: commercialbldg @aim.com I live in Naples on 68th st sw. My neighbors and I OPPOSE the development of commercial property anywhere along Golden gate pkwy between 68th st sw and 70 th st sw. Do we not have enough building going on in our area? When is enough going to be enough? We have a quiet neighbor hood, the last thing we need is a gas station at the end of our road. Crime ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? That will go up most defitnely!!!!!!!! No wonder everyone wants to move away from naples, soon there will be no grass, all concrete!!!!! Thank you Carol & Mark Austin Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high - quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. 1/29/2007 Page l of 1 MoscaMichele From: Diane Ponton [pontondi @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 8:16 PM To: MoscaMichele Cc: pontondi @hotmail.com; PontonRi @collier.k12.fl.us Subject: Golden Gate Parkway changes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Dear Ms. Michele Mosca I would like to share my objection to the Planning Commission Approval of any change to the Ploicy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway Between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara. When this road expansion and new interchange was explained to the residents, we were assured this would area would not be permitted to become a Pine Ridge nightmare. We were informed it would remain a "beautiful gateway to Naples ". We beg you not to allow strip malls, gas stations and such to take over this beautiful residential area. Now the traffic flows smoothly and adding commerical zoning will only create a traffic nightmare like that of Pine Ridge and Immokalee Roads. Sincerely, Diane Ponton 3235 58th ST SW Naples, FL 34116 From predictions to trailers, check out the MSN Entertainment Guide to the Academy Award-s® 2/26/2007 MoscaMichele From: Alice Waggoner [AWaggoner @arclp.com] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:43 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Golden Gate Master Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Please register my objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. I specifically object to the Townsend and the Colonnade projects. I do not want any new commercial uses between Livingston and Santa Barbara. These streets are residential and I hope they remain that way. Sincerely, Alice Waggoner 3089 641i St. SW Naples, Fl., 34105 262 -7341 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 MoscaMichele From: Robin Doyle [rdoyle @doyleresolution.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:19 PM To: MoscaMichele Cc: 'Kris Doyle', 'Tom Collins' Subject: Rezoning Petitions for Golden Gate Parkway Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Ms Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Dear Ms Mosca: I reside on 70th St. SW, south of Golden Gate Parkway. My wife, Kris and I are opposed to the addition of new commercial uses along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. There are a number of reasons we believe the addition of commercial zoning is not good planning for our area or for the County as a whole. The county has grown dramatically since we built our home on 70d' St in 1978. We have seen Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway grow from two -lane roadways to major arteries. The Interstate made its appearance and now Livingston Road has opened. The one constant through all of this has been the residential nature of our neighborhood. We chose not to live in a gated community, believing our part of the Estates would always remain residential. It would be easy to say that growth is inevitable, but to allow commercial to creep into the Golden Gate corridor would spell the end of the quality neighborhood we now enjoy. Commercial retail and office may be compatible with residential in some urban settings, but it is not compatible with our neighborhood where minimum lots are 2.25 acres and many residents have horses or other animals. When the need for an interchange at Golden Gate Parkway and the Interstate became apparent, I was a member of the Board of the Collier County Economic Development Council. The EDC supported construction of the interchange with the stipulation that commercial zoning not be allowed. The thinking then was that the Golden Gate interchange would be the gateway to the heart of Naples, and we should show the quality of life we enjoy here by the lack of commercial properties cluttering this corridor. The EDC has long maintained that people and businesses are drawn to Naples by the quality of life. If we don't protect our quality of life, we will have little to offer companies who would bring high wage, economically diversified jobs to the County. I attended the informational meeting hosted by representatives of the owner of the Livingston Road property. At that meeting, there were many who spoke in opposition to the proposal. The only person who spoke in favor was the owner of a parcel which fronts on Golden Gate Parkway and who expressly stated that he supported the petition because he wanted to have commercial property, too. This shows what will happen to the community if these changes are allowed. We will be inundated with additional requests for changes to the Comp Plan and the zoning. 2/26/2007 Page 2 of 2 When the developers of Grey Oaks petitioned for their PUD several years ago, they requested commercial along Livingston Road south of Golden Gate Parkway. There were objections to that proposal because of the character of the neighborhood and the possibility of "commercial creep." As a result, the petitioner changed the PUD to provide for residential property at that location. For the same reasons, the owner of the property at the northeast comer of that intersection should not be allowed to rezone to commercial. Policy 5.2.3 was approved several years ago to implement protection against the changes that are being requested here. The policy should be enforced and not modified. The changes requested are not good for the neighborhood or for the County. Sincerely, Robert E. Doyle, Jr. ( "Robin ") 3201 701h St. SW Naples, Florida 34105 239 - 263 -0929 2/26/2007 Van Zandt Williams, Jr. 1626 Chinaberry Way Naples, Florida 34105 Ph: 239 - 262 -5093 Fax: 239- 262 -8702 vanzandt@princeton.edu January 2, 2007 Ms. Linda Bedtelyon Community Development & Environmental Services Administration 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Ref: Property at 11150 Livingston Road; Naples (Folios 38100400006 & 38100360007) Dear Ms. Bedtelyon: My wife and I are residents at 1626 Chinaberry Way in Grey Oaks, near the subject property. We saw the notice of the meeting on Dec. 19, but we were away at the time and could not attend. However, we would like to go on record as strongly protesting any commercial or industrial development on that site or any other in that area. We both believe the future land use map is correct in not allowing commercial development along Golden Gate Parkway in this area for several reasons: 1. Both Livingston and Golden Gate in this area are now critical traffic carriers and anything that disrupts the flow of traffic there could significantly affect this critical purpose. 2. While it might seem that a small site as this would have minimal impact, it will set an irreversible precedent for the whole block bounded by Livingston, Golden Gate, 1-75 and Wyndemere. Given the intensive development of the section along Pine Ridge to the north, there is little justification for creating a new commercial center here. Put another way, we don't need another strip shopping center that may eventually fail and then become a part of a larger commercial center in the future. 3. The area is already filled with attractive residential homes in a heavily treed section of town. Such a development will create a real eyesore for the adjacent homes. 4. The Golden Gate corridor from 1 -75 to the west is soon to become a major access point to the Naples area, and having this section continue to be a well landscaped residential/golf corridor down to the Gordon River offers a very attractive "entrance" to the Naples area. 5. Successful arguments to the effect that the land can't be sold (profitably) as residential property would perpetuate an unfortunate trend in Florida (and elsewhere) that any property near a large road or intersection must become commercial. We don't believe there's any justification for such claims, nor should the "opportunity" to capitalize on the capital investments of the citizenry at large be allowed to change thoughtful land use planning. In sum, we hope the planning authorities will stick to the original plan and NOT allow a change in use here. S cerely, Van Zandt Williams Jr. cc: Grey Oaks Property Owners Association Myra N. Wiliams February 12, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department Collier County Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: NE corner of Livingston Road & Golden Gate Parkway Dear Ms. Mosca: 1 am writing this letter on behalf of the Wyndemere Homeowners Association to express our opposition to the proposed amending of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan which would allow for the change of use of that Parcel of Land located at the northeast corner of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway from its current Estates Designation to the Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict. As you know, Wyndemere which is located on Livingston Road consists 4 63 3 households in a gated Community. It is our understanding that the approved Master Plan for Golden Gate Parkway currently prohibits commercial /retail development between Santa Barbara Blvd. and Livingston Road, except for those parcels that were "grandfathered" in at the time the Plan was adopted. Golden Gate Parkway will become the main gateway to Naples once the new 1 -75 interchange opens and it is critically important to the ambiance of Naples that this road remain an attractive thoroughfare in keeping with the existing character of the neighborhood instead of a congested commercial roadway similar to Pine Ridge Road. If this tract of land is permitted to be developed as a commercial site, it will create an unalterable change in the Livingston Road neighborhood. A commercial project at this location will create demand from contiguous lots to also be converted to commercial zoning since they will then be located adjacent to a commercial development. Approval of this site to commercial zoning will create pressure to eventually rezone the entire land between the intersection and Wyndemere, one parcel at a time. A similar fate will result for each residential lot on Golden Gate Parkway, east of the intersection. This prospect is real and contrary to all previous Planning Department decisions. l Ftomeowners Association m / . I 1 111 m<r no rsi . .r_. r- k 1 rr r I.,nv r+ I +n I IN Mosca letter Page 2 The traffic situation from a commercial /retail site at this location will be disastrous and unsafe. Ingress to the site is planned to be off of Golden Gate Parkway which has the potential to back up traffic dangerously close to an intersection that everyone agrees will become overburdened once the I -75 interchange is opened. In addition, it will be very confusing to have a right turn into a development so close to the right turn for Livingston Road. Egress will be equally bad; customers of commercial /retail development at this location will be required to exit the site on the northbound lane of Livingston Road. Cars turning right off Golden Gate onto Livingston Road within a few seconds will be confronted by cars leaving the commercial /retail site. Also those cars leaving this commercial /retail site onto Livingston Road and desiring to travel south will be forced to drive north to the traffic light and make a U turn at the entrance to Wyndemere and Grey Oaks, thus creating a hazardous situation for our residents as they exit Wyndemere. Ingresses and egresses so close to a major intersection will frustrate the designed purpose of arteries: to expedite safely the flow of traffic. In addition there is no demonstrated need for commercial /retail buildings at this intersection - -- retail stores and offices are already in close proximity to people living in the area. We strongly urge the Collier County Officials to abide by its previous decision to prohibit any future commercial or retail development along this section of the Golden Gate Parkway. To do anything else would (i) violate the County's prior commitment to residents in this area, (ii) create an unnecessary traffic burden on Golden Gate Parkway & Livingston Road and (iii) destroy the community standards already approved by the Master Plan. Very truly yurs, 6?044 i, President omeowners Association, Inc. February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: V Townsend David Lawrence Center t./ Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: Date:��p0r N�� 34ios Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: O Tevdrtsexd•-- (',&WVA- O David Lawrence Center Colonnade e�L�QOVY �� D vvu-� Sincerely, Name Address Sao %fi �� ) 3 ids Ms. Michele Zyld§c4 A1Cp ; Principal Planner ` Comprehensive Planning Department 28nn North H rseshoa Drive o Naples FL34104 1 �. Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: O Townsend O David Lawrence Center 0 Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address / W N�Oies) F1 � �Q� 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Golden Gate, FL 34116 Michele R. Mosca Principal Planner Planning Commissioners: Petition CP- 2005 -04 Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict We were involved in discussions since the early 1990's on plans to have an I -75 interchange on Golden Gate Parkway. The interchange has always been sold and requested that there would be no new commercial allowed going east and west of this intersection. This "No new commercial" mantra has been pitched for over 16 years. Golden Gate planned their Master Plan commercial zoning based on this promise. Naples residents found the new interchange palatable because of this promise. This I -75 interchange wouldn't have received support or ever been built had the prospect of added commercial zoning been possible at the intersection of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway. Please vote down this proposal based on promises made to the community to allow the I- 75 interchange to exist. Keith Denny President Golden Gate Civic Association 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Golden Gate, FL 34116 Michele R. Mosca Principal Planner Planning Commissioners: Petition CP- 2005 -05 Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict. (Santa Barbara/Golden Gate Parkway) We have a long history of working with the developer of this property in helping them come to a reasonable solution to commercial zoning and assisting residents to keep a pleasant home atmosphere. We reached a compromise a couple of years ago and this made for a peaceful coexistence between commercial and residential. The same residents requesting this huge increase in density of the zoning are the same people we have been trying to protect for so many years. It pains us to see these property owners trying to inflict the same intensity on what will become the new neighbors if this proposal is accepted. They may have finally reached a price at which they would sell out. This doesn't entitle them to sell out for their neighbors. We request you leave the zoning as it has been negotiated. It made sense a couple of years ago. It still does today. We want the property owners to have opportunity to use the commercial space they have been allotted. It isn't a reason to further encroach into a rural residential neighborhood. Through the Golden Gate Master Plan the community worked for three years to designate where commercial opportunities should exist in the community. This individual property owner has no right to change the rules strictly solely to provide greater opportunity of financial returns than should be allowed. The deals have already been made. We should all live with those deals. Keith Denny President Golden Gate Civic Association Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: duane taylor [dtaylor5 @swfla.rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 8:45 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: KE corner GG Pkway and Livingston. Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue To whom it may concern, We have lived at 6761 Golden Gate Parkway approx. nine years and would like to see a comprehensive land planning change, starting with the NY corner of Golden Gate Pkwy. and Livingston, and continuing the affected length of Golden Gate Pkwy. The city has taken our neighborhood, put in huge street lights, expanded the road to 6 lanes all to which the result is traffic jams that stretch right past our driveway entrance on a daily basis! Not to mention the fact that our mailbox has been relocated 700 feet from our house without even our being notified. With the growing traffic has come the trash which is lost or thrown from vehicles, all of which ends up in our front yards. The drainage has been installed improperly and now we have a river running in our driveway full of cig. buts and trash every time it rains. The next project to be completed and opened in one month is a 4 -way I75 on and off ramp, can you imagine what is going to happen to traffic when it opens? This area is only a few miles from the beach, a couple miles from the mall and zoo and the closest exit to downtown! All involved are certainly invited to stop by and see for themselves. I feel a zoning change is the only possible way to correct what the county has created out of our area. Our neighbors feel the same way we do, and would like a chance to speak for themselves. This effects our lives in so many ways. Thank you for your time. Gratefully, Mr. & Mrs. Duane Taylor 6761 Golden Gate Parkway 239 - 289 -6789 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Cavinl110 @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:18 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: commercialization of Golden Gate Pky Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Ms. Mosca, I purchased property at 6545 Golden Gate Parkway in 1979, when it was a two lane road. I did not purchase this land as an investment, but as my home. I do not wish to live on a six lane highway and I am in favor of the comprehensive land plan amendment. I have my property up for sale. Laura Cavin 6545 Golden Gate Pky Naples, 171.34120 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichete From: Capitalhomesfl @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 2:10 PM To: MoscaMichete Subject: Petitian CP- 2005 -4 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Dear Michele, My name is Darryl Damico, I own a single family house at 6211 Golden Gate Parkway. It is located at the north east corner of the northern on ramp to 1 -75. Needless to say it is no longer rural prime residential property. Who would want to live on a 6 lane highway on an on ramp? For this reason I am in favor of the Comprehensive Land Plan change at the NE corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road. I would like to see a commercial zone on my property as it has no other use and I believe all interchanges along 1 -75 are zoned commercial. I lost property value when the County took my land and value away and will continue to do so. But they could grant it back if they were to zone it commercial. Please consider my situation and vote for a commercial zone. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Darryl J. Damico 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 MoscaMichele From: Kasischke, Carolyn [ Carolyn @rustandchristopher.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 6:26 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Dear Ms Mosca, My name is Carolyn Kasischke and I am a property owner on Golden Gate Parkway. The land was zoned multi- family when we purchased it 20 years ago. Quite a bit of the property was taken for the 1 -75 interchange, leaving us with a parcel that is too small to develop, as we no longer have the necessary footage. In addition I cannot conceive of anyone wanting to build residential buildings right on an interstate or along the Golden Gate Corridor. I have been told our property value has greatly declined, and that the Property Appraiser's Office has reduced our assessment. The only alternative for us is to be able to sell our property to someone else in order to have a large enough parcel. From my point of view it only makes sense that the Golden Gate Corridor is rezoned to commercial. Following the completion of all road projects that road will become a major thoroughfare, no longer suitable for strictly residential projects. I want to add my name to those who support a change in the comprehensive land use plan to allow commercial development on Golden Gate Parkway Thank you for your attention to this matter. Carolyn Kasischke Rust, Christopher & Company, P.A. NUSINESS CONSULTANTS CERTIFIED PURR ACCOUNTANT! 6609 Willow Park Drive, Suite 100 Naples, FL 34109 -8917 Phone: 239.514.5028 x217 Fax: 239 514,7019 w .rustandchnstopher.corn IRS Circular 230 Disclosure To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. The information contained in this electronic mail is personal and confidential and is intended only for the person or persons named above. This message and the information contained in this electronic mail may be include information that is confidential and/or subject to the accountant - client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the recipient named above or an authorized agent of such recipient responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this electronic mail in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or electronic mail and delete the original 2/23/2007 MoscaMichele From: Ronald Derr [ronaldderr @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:07 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Comp. Plan change to Rezone GoldenGate Parkway Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Greetings Ms.Mosca, My name is Gerald "Bud "Frey,and I own property on Goldengate Parkway,between Livingston rd. and the new interchange. I am in FAVOR of and SUPPORT the effort to change the current residential zoning to COMMERCIAL zone. I have watched my property decrease in size and value,due to road expansion,based on current zoning. Who in their right mind would want to build a home in this area on the parkway as is currently zoned? The people who resist this zone change will not lose their property value,as they are not on the Parkway,as we are. They could care less about us,we lose our property value,and they keep theirs. This is very one sided and unfair. I have noticed that owners at the northeast corner of Goldengate PKWY and Livingstone rd. are petitioning to rezone to build an office building. This type of commercial would be environmentlly friendly blending in. This type could be the norm along the parkway retaining a classy appearance. along the parkway. Ms. Mosca, THANK YOU for receiving my email, and would you please place this into Public Records for reference to the March 5th Petition meeting. Could you also please email me at the address below for comfirmation, thank you again. Respectfully, Bud Frey my address: budlakesbellsouth.net Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all -new Yahoo! Mail beta. http: / /new.mail.yahoo.com MoscaMichele From: Ronald Derr [ronaldderr @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:40 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Golden Gate Parkway comp. plan change, rezone Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Hello Ms.Mosca: We are Fred and Maureen Olsen, Naples residents. This subject is in relation to comprehensive Plan change for rezoning of the corridor on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Rd and the interchange. We are in favor of a Comp. Plan change and for the re- zoning to commercial along this section of Goldengate Parkway. I ask that the GMP Amendment CO- 2005 -04, :Policy 5.2.3 be removed and rescinded to allow commercial zoning. Please record in Public Records for March 5th meeting on this subject and also please confirm via the following e- mail address, ronaldderr@Yahoo.com Thank you, respectfully, Fred Olsen 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. nttp: // tools. search.yahoo.com /shortcuts/ #news MoscaMichele From: Ronald Derr [ronaldderr @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:21 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Comp Plan change, Parkway Golden Gate, rezone Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue I am Robert Derr, property owner on Golden Gate Par kway, between Livingston Rd and the interchange. I attended the neighborhood meeting on Jan 22,2007 concerning the possible change of the comp. plan to allow commercial zoning between livingston road along that corridor to the interchange on ggpkwy. I am in favor and in full support of the Comp.Plan Change to allow commercial development along this area of the parkway. since I have owned my property, the dynamics of this location have changed dramatically from a quiet two lane road to a noisy, busy, six lane expressway joined up to an interchange which will yield massive amounts of traffic and noise. This incredible change,potiently exceeding the pine ridge road traffic,is resulting in a devaluation of any residential planning that I might have on my property on golden gate parkway. I am sure the county would greatly benefit from huge property tax increases as a result of comp.plan change to re -zone commercial, the highest land use zoning. I ask that the GMP amendment: co- 2005- 04,policy 5.2.3. restricting any further conditional -use or commercial be REMOVED from the comp.plan allowing me to regain lost property value by re- zoning this area. THANK YOU Michele for reviewing this email. Would you please add this statement to the public records for the March 5th meeting,and also could you confirm this via the following email. Thankyou respectfully, Robert Derr confirm email: ronaldderr @yahoo.com Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all -new Yahoo! Mail beta. http: / /new.mail.yahoo.com 1 Page 1 of 2 MoscaMichele From: DVatHurricaneStop [hurricanestop @bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:30 PM To: MoscaMichele Cc: Hurricane Stop CC Subject: YES to Rezoning on Golden Gate Pkwy (Petition CP- 2005 -4) Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Hello Michele, I also attended the 1 -22 -07 neighborhood meeting on rezoning the NE corner of Livingston and GGate Pkwy. I want to have my opinion noted in public records and would like to verify that this was accomplished. Can you send me a copy of the documentation? I am in full support of the effort to amend the future land use map and text to allow commercial development at this location. Furthermore, I feel that this effort is only the tip of the iceberg since many of my neighbors on Golden Gate Pkwy would like to see the entire corridor open to commercial development. The current residential zoning is inconsistent for a location on a very busy 6 lane road with an interchange nearby. Properties on the pkwy are now losing residential value and it is clear that properties are declining in appearance and maintenance. It is not practical to raise a family on such a busy road and many of us are looking to rent our homes to try to get a return on our investment. Proliferation of rental property will surely cause a further decline in appearance for the area. This is COUNTER PRODUCTIVE even for those who live off the pkwy on the side streets (many of whom oppose commercial development). Other unimproved properties along the pkwy are full of unsightly scrub brush and trees and are surely not an asset to the community. The only thing that makes sense is to allow commercial development along the pkwy and to control the development to assure that a high end land use plan is developed as was done at The Vineyards on Pine Ridge Rd. The benefit to the county will be millions in tax dollars and this will be achieved through the "highest and best use" of the properties. In effect what has happened to us on the pkwy is that we have been penalized by the widening and the interchange. Therefore, we are demanding our rights to be heard and be given a fair chance to improve our property values by rezoning the entire corridor. Further residential development of the area will need CONCURRENT development in residential commercial support such as grocery stores, gas stations, drug stores and general shopping. The area is in desperate need of such facilities now. Driving to Pine Ridge Rd. or Golden Gate is not a long term solution for shopping. Please do what makes sense: improve the commercial infrastructure of this area and improve the tax base for the county. The following language in GMP Amendment CO- 2005 -04, Policy 5.2.3: "no further commercial zoning for properties abutting GG Pkwy..." must be removed since it is inconsistent with the benefit of the majority of county residents and it restricts our rights as citizen to improve our property values. Thank you for listening and please send me confirmation that this was added to public records. Douglas Voita 6895 Golden Gate Pkwy Naples, FL From: MoscaMichele [ mailto :MicheleMosca2 @colliergov.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:18 PM To: Al Bremerman Subject: RE: Planning Meeting? (Petition CP- 2005 -4) AJ: 2/23/2007 Page 2 of 2 The Collier County Planning Commission is scheduled to hear the 2005 Growth Management Plan Amendments on March 5, beginning at 8:30 a.m. in the W. Harmon Turner Building (3rd floor Boardroom), located at the County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples- (As emphasized at the Neighborhood Information Meeting, it is unknown at this time if the Commission will hear all 13 private petitions on this date, this petition is scheduled to be heard 41h, but the Chair may choose to hear petitions out of order.) Please contact me should you have questions or need additional information. Regards, Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Government 239 -403 -2466 From: ABremerman @gatesmcvey.com [mailto:ABremerman @gatesmcvey.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:49 AM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Planning Meeting? Michele, I was in attendance at the public meeting on Monday night regarding the comprehensive land plan change for the NE corner of Golden Gate Pkwy and Livingston Rd. As I understand it there is a planning meeting on March 5t' to be held at the county to discuss the possibility of an amendment to the comprehensive land plan. Can you let me know when, where, and with whom this meeting will be held? Thanks, AJ 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 II MoscaMichele From: David Frey and Rebecca Leffler [sassybaby135 @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:52 PM To: MoscaMichele Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Dear Ms. Mosca, my name is David Frey,l own property on golden parkway near 66th street, north side on parkway. I have owned this property twenty years with the intention of building a home. but with the intense changes of a six lane highway and interchange about one quarter mile from me. there is little chance now that I or any of my family members would want to live in this area under these conditions with the intense noise, pollution, and traffic. as a result, my home investment value has decreased under current zoning. I am very angry with this group of local people and no so local ;resisting in any change to current zoning, which robs me the ability to recapture lost property value. it is MY STERN EXPRESSION TO FAVOR AND SUPPORT OF A COMP. PLAN CHANGE TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL ZONING. some people mention school bus stopping as a reason to keep current zoning, but with large increases of traffic along this parkway, it would not matter what type of zoning, the traffic will be massive whether commercial or not. thank you Ms. Mosca., also would please place this e-mail into the public records for the march 5th meeting with confirmation via my following e-mail, thank you. David Frey 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Baatman74 @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:33 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Opinion on commercial development along GG Pkwy Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue MS. Mosca, I am totally and whole - heartedly IN FAVOR of changing the GG Master Plan to allow commercial development along the Golden Gate Parkway. On 9/11/2001, 1 petitioned the Commissioners to force the builders of this Interchange to place a full Cloverleaf here, which would have taken out my property where I have lived for the past 28 years. The Commissioners ignored me and allowed them to 'squeeze' this Interchange in around our homes, much like you see in New Jersey, I believe it has de- valued my property, so, yes, 1 vote FOR the commercial zoning... Thank you, Virgil Cottongim 3090 64th St SW Naples, FL 34105 -7300 239 - 262 -2656 2/23/2007 FEB -16 -2007 08:11 Naples Medical Center TO: MICHELE MOSCA FROM: GUS AND BESSIE PAPAGIANNIS RE: PLANNING MEETING (PETITION CP- 2005 -4 I LIVE AT 6721 GOLDEN GATE PKWY, AND I AM IN FAVOR OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN AMENDMENT OF THE NE CORNER OF GOLDEN GATE PKWY AND LIVINGSTON RD. BELOW ARE THE REASONS WHY. I DID NOT ASK FOR A SIX LANE HIGHWAY ACROSS THE FRONT OF MY PROPERTY. I DID NOT ASK FOR I -75 EXCHANGE TO GO IN, NOR DID I ASK FOR AN OVERPASS OVER AIRPORT ROAD. I DID NOT ASK FOR CONDITIONAL USES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE COMP PLAN LANGUAGE. THE COUNTY TOOK AWAY ALL CONDITIONAL AND COMMERCIAL USAGE POTENTIAL FROM MY PROPERTY AND LEFT ME WITH ESTATES ZONING. ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS LISTED WERE BEYOND MY CONTROL AND HURT MY PROPERTY VALUES. ALL I ASK FOR IS FOR MY LIFE SAVINGS TO REMAIN INTACT AND ALLOW ME TO GET THE HIGHEST VALUE FOR MY PROPERTY. THE COUNTY TOOK MY PROPERTY VALUE AWAY, AND NOW THEY SHOULD GRANT ME THE OPTION TO GIVE IT BACK. THAT IS WHY I AM IN FAVOR OF THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE NE CORNER OF GOLDEN GATE PKWY AND LIVINGSTON ROAD. THANK YOU, � I� 01,610-7 GUS PAPAGIANNIS a._, e6prx�l alf-I a�l(p�D7 BESSIE PAPAGIANNIS P.01 Page 1 of I MoscaMichele From: robert uhlich [rtuhlich @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:10 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Comp plan change Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Dear Ms. Mosca. My name is Robert Uhlich and I am a property owner on the Golden Gate Parkway. I am highly in favor of the change in the comprehensive land use plan for the NE corner of Livingston Rd. and the G.G. Parkway. My property value as well as others in the area has plummeted.( Mr. Skinner's office agreed and reduced my assessment $100,000.)When I purchased the property it was zoned multi - family. The county took that away, and now has created a monster in my front yard. It should not be my responsibility to remedy what the county has done to myself and others in the neighborhood, but should be the sole responsibility of the perpetrator of this sad state of affairs. In short, Collier County change the land use plan. Thank you for your attention in this matter Robert Uhlich I would like to speak at the hearing. Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know. 2/26/2007 -- v-)A. CIO , d -7 CL I VV%-O v\ yv4 o A- e_ a 1 0 4,L-\ _ jyz�7 � C. CA vk -- �-�..� C�cr -�. � � � s o�F' �b-(.� to �., -.-. `�� P�r-a►7e,r� ^ter fit` A (�I D � « i� � � � 7 C-4 . TroPP- r �TL,�S Q� E <<c me -.3-- NJ e t;-f- (V-\ \ i \. V, MoscaMichele From: edwinkoert@msn.com Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 8:35 PM To: MoscaMichele Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue February 12, 2007 @ 8:30p.m. Re: Change in the comprehensive land use plan for the NE corner of Livingston Rd and Golden Gate Parkway Dear Ms. Moses: My name is Edwin H. Koert, a sixty rear resident of Florida, of which thirty years was in Broward County (Hollywood /Ft. Lauderdale), and thirty years in Collier County (Naples). Believe me when I say, i §I have seen, understand, and have been impacted by the GROWTHi. I understand the requirements for implementing changes to the comprehensive land use plan'. As a property owner on G. G. pkwy, I am very much in SUPPORT the above reference change. The County Comprehensive Land Use Planners are not doing justice to the property along G.G..Pkwy. Currently they bury their collective heads in the sand and perpetuating the existing residential zoning requirement. The County Land Use Planners need to become proactive, open their eyes and see the CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE that has taken place on both sides of G.G.Pkwy., between Santa Barbara and airport Pulling Road. Facts: „I G.G.Pkwy. has been expanded into a SUPER HIGHWAY. „I Property(s) has plummeted adjoining G.G.Pkwy., Fact. As a result of the G.G.Pkwy. expansion, the I -75 on /off ramp, and the Airport Pulling Road Bridge, the property Appraisers Office, (Mr. Abe Skinner) after review of documentation, has agreed and reduced such value of my property, approximately $100K. „I Livingston Road has been made into a North /South artery, thus, contributing to additional traffic along G.G.Pkwy. „I Rush hour traffic in the a.m. and p.m. is increasing daily. „I A new G.G.Pkwy. and Airport Pulling Road BRIDGE, is in its final phase of construction. This super structure, when completed §will be a significant contributor to the increased traffic count along G.G.Pkwy. „I I -75 on and off ramp at G.G.Pkwy. is due to be opened soon. Traffic count you say? It is going to be one very bad dream. The bridge opening crossing Airport Pulling Road and the I -75 on /off ramp opening will not be pleasant for anyone living along G.G.Pkwy. „I G.G.Pkwy. is already a mixture of Commercial (Grandfathered) and Residential properties. It is time for the Collier County Land Use Planners to act and change the comprehensive land use plan. Specifically, change the properties adjoining G.G.Pkwy., between Santa Barbara and Airport Pulling Road from Residential to i §Commerciali ". The onus to initiate change to the comprehensive land use plan should not be on the shoulders of the properties owners. The onus is the sole responsibility of our representative, via the Collier County Land Use Planning Department. Thank you for the opportunity to respond on such an important issue. I£ I am fortunate to be in Naples and time permitting, I would like to speak at the "- hearing. Sincerely, 1 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We strongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new corrunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: F Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this conununity. Sincerely, Signed: A, /t )'V 61 zlf(Z'l Date: February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2500 North Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele MoseaCColliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 ot'Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: ✓2 Townsend David Lawrence Center l/ Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. 'There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: � Date. Ms. Michele 1Nf6sca,�,AJCP v; Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL34104 x Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend O'/David Lawrence Center QY / Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address Colleen a Jan Bailey 2610 64th St. SW Naples, FL 34105 -7306 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E-mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: It Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Cornmercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, � r Si red: u V�� Date: �i i February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new conunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: +-' Townsend '�- David Lawrence Center i/ Colonade I object to any Conunercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: Date: 2 I i6. U l February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca@Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Co remission_ We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: f Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Connnereial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this conununity. Sincerely, Signed: - -- ` - - -1 -= � � - - -- Date: ✓� 1�� 'C� �� February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: c/ Townsend �/--`David Lawrence Center I/Colonade I object to any Connnercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, BENSON, KENNETH D =& LINDA 2995 70111 ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 Signed: G_ /%? 7---- Date: 1 ?-G Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: * Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address ila- _ Tl� A- J0- 4P _ 3�! a 5 Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address n /- -S ,-)3 S G'9 J, A Ms. Michele Wgu;�AtCP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 4,;V 2 300 North Horseshoe Drive Isaples FL34 4 Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along C,old= Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 0 Townsend 4) David Lawrence Center 1) Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address g 4/5 ee *y' 's tA/ &a CI i, T Gil-Gi,9-662 boo-jg �ajaa d8J,:Lo Lo so qa_-j FEB /15 /2007 /THU 09,07 FM ADVANCED MEDICAL FAX No,239 566 9149 F. 001 /001 Ms. Michele.tkc:j�A'l�;r Principal Plauhd. Comprehensive Planning Department 280 North HMeshoe I)riv Naples FL3Q4% :'..t' Please register m ur bjection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Crate Master Plan that would. allow new commercial use along Golden Crate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: bl Townsend David Lawrence Center V Colonnade SWcerely, Name lll✓✓✓ r 1 a3A CO U3 1/arles L . .3Y /I February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2500 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Conunission. We stongly Nvant the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against an_v changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: n� Townsend e/ David Lawrence Center L/ Colonade I object to any Cornmercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, 1 Signed: rq, ,��U._ Date:•( / L Ms. Michele Principal Planner' Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples]FL34104� Please register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: ownsend :vid Lawrence Center I /Colonnade Sincerely, Name � C Address February 14, 2007 Ms, Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2500 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects witb the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new cotmmercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below_ )f Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade 1 object to airy Cormnercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: —Date: 0 ) _ <4 — Z Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: XTownsend XDavid Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name n � � _ aw 0--� Address Feb-12-07 11:04A 4 ..." J, v Ms. Michele Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive NapiesFL34IQ4: Please register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: &- Townsend 01XIDavid Lawrence Center O' Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address ef fh 57t, 6—,1-4J P.03 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca(a Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 52.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 4- Townsend r' V,D�avid Lawrence Center /Colonade I object to any Coimnercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: _ Date: I - - -- //5 i�Elf5ix7L - MoscaMichele From: Mary [mary@dodaslandscaping.coml Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:21 PM To: MoscaMichele Cc: Mary Doria Subject: Objection Golden Gate Parkway Re- zoning Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Please register our objection to Planning Commission Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along and Santa Barbara Blvd The specific project(s) objected to are (x) below. Townsend _x_ David Lawrence Center Colonnade Parkway between Page 1 of 1 Z We furthermore state that we object to any changes for Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. of any nature. Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. Rey Doria Homeowner for 28 yrs. @ 3145 58th Street S.W. Naples Florida 34116 P.O. Box 8539 Naples, Florida 34101 -8539 M.J. Doris Doria's Landscaping, Inc. PO Box 8262 Naples, Florida 34101 (239) 455 -1419 extension 207 Fax(239)455 -6213 www.doriaslandscaping.com 2/26/2007 Feb -12 -07 11:04A Ms. Michele V6i'ci,:AlCP " 4 Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL341,04 j Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name ress / P.02 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Th e5ecific project(s) objected to are checked below: 7 �. _ Townsend /David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: J _ Date: / 2-12-07; 8:08 ;DIVCO CONSTRUCTION ;2395925477 # IOV'*&C/7- oe 77W r04-1-4;,94I Us A(.' 11.7 rmqm Comprehensive PWM!n mtnwW 28015 North Horseshoe Pfive X Please register my/our objection to planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 61/ Townsend V David Lawrence Center IP/ Colonnade Sincerely, I o February 14, 2007 7 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2300 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca a Colliergovmet Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.23 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: _/ Townsend _L/David Lawrence Center vColonade 1 object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway, The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this commtmity. Sincerely, FOWLER, CHARLES W =& MARY ANTN 2840 70TH ST S W Naples, Florida 34105 Signed: C -w(y� C �' -<_ _ �3 �`'� � Date: 0 Wlft� ��, X13 Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: V" Townsend 6 David Lawrence Center 0//Colonnade Sincerely, Nar Address 27Y6;,12 T'd aLLS- 192-T46 SINN39 ANHUI z d2E :10 LO OT 9a3 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: r/Townsend k-/David Lawrence Center ,ZColonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, ' -`� L Signed: O(� J' ��L Date: C' aw February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Pax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca n,Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new eormnercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specificproject(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend _ David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendrnents approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this cotmmrnity. Sincerely, 2'7z' 1 Signed: Date: February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele MoseaCaColliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect, We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: - "Townsend David Lawrence Center X AColonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: Date: -- -- GRANT, GLENN E—& DEBRA 2910 70TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 - -4 70- February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2300 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosea (e�.Colhergov. net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 'Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, 'V �V r Signed: ! �4' _ _ -- Date: 7 _ GRANT, GLENN —& DEBRA 2351 68TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 FEB 20,2007 13:18 5668558 Page 1 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naplus, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext.2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2940 E -mail: Michele Mosca @g Colliergov.nct Please register my objection to the following projects with llw Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between {N . Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. ,, o� Z 0 \\ C%• 1 'The specific project(s) objected to are checked below:: `--�fownsend ` _ David Lawi'rrice Center C.i't'olotladc I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway, The Golden Gale Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. 'There are More than enough commercial projects currently being developed oft Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, ; z Y j_ � , Date: X Ms. Mcbde Nh*g Mannei CA=VmWnsive Planning DeparMuft 2W Ncatb Horsedwe Dow NaptasFU41164'". pjmW mpsW my/our oNedm to Planning Comausson Approval of arty change to Policy 5,23 of Goklen Get Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along G31dw Cyme parkway bdwom Livingston Road and Sam Hadma BMWMdL The specific proica(s) objecW to at checked below: Townsend ISM David Lawrence COIW jK Colonnade Sine dy, Nam Address -3 a Y:5 -S: 9-" s f- % Principal Pfanne Comprehensive Planning Deparurtent 29P0 North Horseshoe Drive Napl=FL34104:' Plow register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 ofOolden Gate Water Plan that would allow now commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: • Townsend 0 David Lawrence Comm 0 Colonnade NameS:: Address, Feb 13 07 02:02p Hill Kendall Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning & Development 2800 North Horseshore Drive Naples, Florida 34104 FAX #: 239 -213 -2946 Dear Ms. Mosca: 239 - 732 -5752 p.l Please register our objection to the Planning Commission Approval of any changes to Policy 5.2.3 of The Golden Gate Master Plan, that would allow any new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific projects we are oppossed to are listed below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, -C William C. Kendall 2891 68th Street SW_ Naples, Florida 34105 Donna M. Kendall L 2891 68th Street SW. Naples, Florida 34105 L L- Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The suecific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend V/ David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name :/ < Address 06 r-Ls 1� -', � <s(6� 3�4Qs 02/14/2007 19:28 3169457620 HILTON ICT AIRPORT PF,GE 01/01 2-13 - Ms. Michele I Principal Planner' Comprehensive Planning Department 28P0 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL34104 -:" J' Please register my/ouypbjection to Planning Commission Approval of my change to Policy 5,2,3 of Golden Gate Mast" Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway betwWn Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address c, February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend Y David Lawrence Center X Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, 1 ` ` Signed: Date: February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca Xolliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain ill effect. We are against any changes that would allow new cotmnercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: I[ 'Townsend ,t�, David Lawrence Center / Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this cormnunity. Sincerely, Signed: Date – / —jL L— - 5 _ y Ms Michele BEd kkiAJCP Principal Pinner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples 171341Q4 Please register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Park-way between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 01`�Townsend 8/ David Lawrence Center ��Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address 1)�d�a Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 4� /Townsend 6- David Lawrence Center 43 C/olonnade Sincerely, Name - WAYN1= MAA"S Z-? 50 G(�,� ST S,LJ Address _ I �s 1- t✓ 3 91 os Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend f, David Lawrence Center r Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address � � 0j vy • %ltoS MMI&r4 woo►„ Q e& WWO 4% k , 1% A. February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosea, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2500 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Coll iergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new corrunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Thepecific project(s) objected to are checked below: ±/ Townsend JI)avid Lawrence Center i" Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: Date: -gn lG_E. f L4 // &")Ci --5d!-5 -.2 - .C'90 Tea ^a >p�� Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: ( Townsend David Lawrence Center IY Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address 7 5 % Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Crate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: • Townsend • David Lawrence Center • Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address 2026 (� A"/Ji /rs, i February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new connnercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center �i ["Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: LUCIA, GINA M. 2700 70TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 } Date:�! Feb 15 07 05:02a Wyndemere Country Club 239 - 263 -2748 p.1 Ms. Michele 1r;16sca,RAtCi? ; Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL341 p4 Please register my our bjection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Go n Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: —OL Townsend - David Lawrence Center i Colonnade Sincerely, Sincerely, Name Address Icy 02/16/2007 18:45 2394036134 MONTY PAaE 01 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, gICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept_ 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E-mail: Michele Mosea@Colliergov.aet Please register my objection to the follow want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Ga a Projects sh p to iPlanmrrg Commission. We stongiy any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate in "'- We are a Livingston Road and Santa Barbara $oulevard against Parkway between The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center � Colonade 1 object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it contently stands, should be adhered to with No .Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine ,Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: fk -u..Ll�- fijhlvT-� Date: February 14, 2007 M::. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 F -mail: Michele Mosca@Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Lil,ingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 2 Townsend David Lawrence Center Cl Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master PIan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Date: a. lei-o7 Z Z699- 0£4-6ZZ Ala9 dLZ :lO LO OZ 9azI February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2500 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov. net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Cormnission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkwaybetween Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center y//'Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. 'There are more than enough commercial projects cu rently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this coiwnunity. Sincerely, Signed: l February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Napless, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E-mail: Michele Mosca a Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center f— Colonade I object to any Conunercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this conununity. Sincerely, Signed: Date'' C � f 02/14/2007 09:53 2393944109 No Plannbg Departcm. err 21011 ah #0 Naples ISLAND TITL Please 19wlermylottr objection to pknr& C Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Ma 8 Commission Approval of my change Golden Gate Parkway SW Plan that would h to allow ravel use along between 11WO"on Road and Sawa B"Wit Boulevard. W*Cific PrOject(s) objected to are checked 0- Townsend WZDavid Lawrence Center Colonnade skwdy, I ! 11211, PAGE 01/01 J. Ms. Michele W6J*i4AJ)CP R . x Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL34104 .. . Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address DTC�f,(✓ 'Z`� ��'zt..�.e iGt�s" -�� c'�C2t,C�,�1r, y�.t �i,�. Go -•y/a s�^c,i'z ��c %.�✓ 3. V G. vy n"/l/n�,�'nlj�l" /�11.`'(r''0�, ��.p .-E C� ✓`'L� � Lyr�J //� `i.� �'� �i""•�'Li �[ ".1, %C�. n s 7 - Y/ `C CE p� .%o.�cPsirk -�� GQcrtes�� LG@- CP.a ca , U/.e c��.e C'- .re�Iile�f .G�•�- -Qo�.� �� eP.�ip�6m.� �Q py�¢,L�a�¢�,ly �� ce ArL Aee (7 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new conunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Ii Townsend ✓David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this cormnunity_ Sincerely, RODKEY, DAVID L =& CYNTHIA S 3221 68TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 Signed: Date: 4—hr r f z Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend \`O David Lawrence Center \O Colonnade Sincerely, Name _ , J / %a 6-1-1-) ' ST S • / �l� /'/. 3Y1OJ Sharon Lambert Jay Rogers 3170 W St., SW Naples, FL 34105 T February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca@Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend 14 David Lawrence Center JColonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: J ti` / ✓ : Date: r � r I, Ms. Michele >k ok ,:AICP Principal Planner'` Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL34104 Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: O Townsend • David Lawrence Center 0 Colonnade Sincerely, Name Address C� „ ._ 2y1 ,4 � WHAT IS GOING TO BE BUILT ON THE CORNEAL OF YOUR STREET GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY? February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We strongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: _L Townsend Y David Lawrence Center k Colonade T object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: D ate: �i �o 7 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2500 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center � s Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, !l`r Signed: —y u (, L' �: '�. Date: SCHUCH, MATTHEW F 27100 70TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 FROM : FAX NO. :2396434591 Mar. 01 2007 05:02RM P1 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 - 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca@Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against my changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific projects) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonado I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, C O t'C er. (� S C C C'-z- --) ot7a� o� 1�ZV6:� FV Signed: Date: 0 / (0-7 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new conunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Conunnercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: 7 _ 7b �— Date: February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239-213-2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: v l Townsend ✓ David Lawrence Center ✓ Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community_ Sincerely, Signed C `>� c'_ t i -1/ Dat / /Y e: fir, t✓ l7 0 ' ! �--- �� 02-15-1900 03:17PM Y X, W. Iffichdo MAR * �' Princio Pinner 6, Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive , I r., ': - Naples FL34104: Please register my/out objection to Planning Comtnission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow now conunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are chocked below: )K Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name 4� Address 3a�\aS. �7k (D W" TOTAL D.01 Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: W�Townsend /David Lawrence Center 0 Colonnade Sincerely, Name 1�• � ^ � q �, Z, Address ke je 4 Ms Michele M6"i,AJCP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL34104' Please register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center X" Colonnade Sincerely, Name I - ,-r,9,4 -.-; :5 Z," A-)6 Address A-11 . - n111TIll-e-5. FL :5 5 Y/ February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept, 2300 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca c,Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new conunercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: -V T T/ownsend t David Lawrence Center T Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Al Signed: Date: 1` 1 -'V� 704 +, 1.,` February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca ,Co Ifergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center AColonade I object to any Cortunercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway, The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, TEACH TR, CAROLYN H 550 70TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 Signed: G /L Date: -a Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name " c) h ra P rrn �r s Address ,30 30 (,y rh St-rt e-E Sw Naples 3 -y1os- I.l)2 >um 4-wo a acJe_ huW�lab /e tom Cn� to `l fi h 5 r e e :SW (I/v-) of L4- -k v c Wrl u4 '1a two a �f �� }, '-e2 NO vok°s wr a t F - E-I'1fe2 QVUy8Qi5 �Y � l�s� 1c�o 16(s, I vse buc�dQble U - O u Y vvr Ct t a (4 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Plainer Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Cotliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new connnercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: J� _- Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway_ The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this conununity. Sincerely, Signed: %4 r-- -( I- (? C 7 Date: _ �� ' �, Ms. Michele NI65c,A,, AtCP Principal Planner ` n Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive ., Naples FL34104 Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: A� Townsend 0 David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Name C% Address Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below- Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, �lG'�✓Z— -- -- Name �1 � � ' Y • O'f O 0 VI) Address ask 1 G4-1-4– S f S. W 02/18/2007 09:02 941- 594 -5532 TOP BRASS METALCRAFT PAG- 01 February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Moses, A1CP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239- 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Fax: 239 -213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stong ly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. DV E' .gl � Z ` / l yid / }"7 The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: Townsend ✓�D'avid Lawrence Center +' Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barban. and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, Signed: f C 4Z C�' L- Date: 2 - 19 - 41 7 Ms. Michele. * WP Principal Planinier Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL34 Please register my/our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) bjected are checked below: Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonnade Sincerely, Nam Addr Fck-\/ W Oseq i �l Iwo a 13 - aq 1+ (0 Attn. Ms. Mosca, AICP FROM: James W. Walker Cindy D. Walker Property owners on 701h Street Southwest ( #3160) We as property owners off Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston and Santa Barbara Blvd. would like to express our opinion of Policy 5.2.3 on allowing changes of residential zoning to commercial zoning. WE STRONGLY OBJECT to any changes along this stretch of Golden Gate Parkway. Our concerns are as follows, (1) More businesses along this stretch would increase traffic. With the 75 interchange due to open in early March, this will be bringing enough traffic as is. (2) Collier County Schoo) runs 3 buses in the morning and 3 buses in the afternoon that stops at each street along the Parkway (70th 68th 66th etc). Cars run past these buses on a daily basis while they are stopped picking up children. With the interchange opening, there will be more larger trucks, eighteen wheelers etc. exiting and using Golden Gate Parkway as their point of entrance to Naples. It's only a matter of time before a major accident occurs with a bus on this stretch. (3) This section is our neighborhood, please leave it alone and not allow any more growth to be put along this stretch. Thank you your attention to this and keep in mind that families live in this section. James & Cindy Walker Atm. Ms. Mosca, AICP FROM: James W. Walker Cindy D. Walker Property owners on 701h Street Southwest ( #3160) We as property owners off Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston and Santa Barbara Blvd. would like to express our opinion of Policy 5.2.3 on allowing changes of residential zoning to commercial zoning. WE STRONGLY OBJECT to any changes along this stretch of Golden Gate Parkway. Our concerns are as follows, (1) More businesses along this stretch would increase traffic. With the 75 interchange due to open in early March, this will be bringing enough traffic as is. (2) Collier County Schoolsruns 3 buses in the morning and 3 buses in the afternoon that stops at each street along the Parkway (70 , 68`h 66`h etc). Cars run past these buses on a daily basis while they are stopped picking up children. With the interchange opening, there will be more larger trucks, eighteen wheelers etc. exiting and using Golden Gate Parkway as their point of entrance to Naples. It's only a matter of time before a major accident occurs with a bus on this stretch. (3) This section is our neighborhood, please leave it alone and not allow any more growth to be put along this stretch. Thank you your attention to this and keep in mind that families live in this section. James & Cindy Walker February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosea, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 -403 -2400 ext. 2466 Pas: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca@Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: /Townsend _! David Lawrence Center i 1iColonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. 'The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, WALTBILLIG, PETER JOSEPH 2901 70TH ST SW Naples, Florida 34105 Signed: Date:' �� February 14, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Dept. 2500 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239 - 403 -2400 ext. 2466 Pax: 239- 213 -2946 E -mail: Michele Mosca @Colliergov.net Please register my objection to the following projects with the Planning Commission. We stongly want the existing Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan to remain in effect. We are against any changes that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: 1/ "Townsend David Lawrence Center Colonade I object to any Commercial Development on Golden Gate Parkway. The Golden Gate Master Plan, as it currently stands, should be adhered to with No Amendments approved. There are more than enough commercial projects currently being developed on Pine Ridge, Santa Barbara and Radio Roads to support this community. Sincerely, l F Signed: -+— Date: - -�� Ms. Michele Mdse;. -ICP ; Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL341041` Please register my /our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are checked below: )K Townsend David Lawrence Center XColonnade Sincerely, Name Address 0 �'q lsgl) cfe�� 0 v .J /- Y-5 6%a S / S tv /1 %(,thin e Page 1 of 2 MoscaMichele From: George Bond [coach0072002 @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 6:50 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Objection to Any Change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Ms. Michele Moscha, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Dear Ms. Mosca: Recently, there was a presentation to the Golden Gate community of a proposal for a project at the northeast intersection of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The proposal is for the construction of a 40,000 sq. ft. office building and surrounding parking area. This project is to be built on 5 acres that is currently zoned residential. As you know, this project will require that Collier County allow the amendment of the Golden Gate Corridor to allow commercial development along this corridor. Several years ago, at the inception of the project to widen Golden Gate Parkway and construct the interstate exchange in the area, policy was approved by the Collier County Board of Commissioners to alleviate local residents' fears that Golden Gate Parkway would become a commercial corridor similar to that on Pine Ridge Road at its intersection with I -75. Policy 5.2.3 addresses and alleviates these fears. In sum, no new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the segments defined in the policy. We are adamantly opposed to any changes in the aforementioned policy. We have been residents of Collier County since August of 1975. We have lived at our current residence since September of 1986. As you may know, in recent years, we have endured years of construction and now utilization of the six lane Livingston Road which parallels, at close proximity, the back of our Estates home. The noise and debris alone at times are unbearable. We and our neighbors to the south were not worthy of a berm or suitable wall. We were bought off, I suppose. To make matters worse, Livingston Road has become a race track. In addition, we have recently lost an entrance to 70th Street SW from Golden Gate Parkway traveling east, forcing us to make a dangerous U - turn into incoming traffic, soon to be made worse by the opening of the new Golden Gate interchange. Now, the idea of losing more of the integrity of our neighborhood to commercial development is unfathomable and unacceptable to us. In this case, the disciples of profit must not prevail and be permitted to continue to destroy a once pristine community of estate homes and, in effect, to transform it into a commercial zone of office buildings, restaurants, fast foods, convenience stores, and gas stations. Golden Gate Parkway between Airport Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard was never a Pine Ridge Road. Nor should it be permitted to become such. This corridor must remain residential as defined in policy 5.2.3. 2/26/2007 Page 2 of 2 For this reason, we are requesting that you: Please register our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The specific project(s) objected to are: 1. Townsend 2. David Lawrence Center 3. Colonnade Sincerely, George T. Bond, III Fredricka F. Bond 2745 70th Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 239.262.2154 Home 239.298.0063 George's Cell 239.595.0881 Fredricka's Cell Never Miss an Email Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! 2/26/2007 Thomas A. Collins, II 2890 66`h Street, SW Naples, Florida 34105 February 16, 2007 Ms. Michele Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department Collier County Government 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: GMP Amendment CO- 2005 -04 Townsend Livingston Road Commercial Subdistrict Dear Ms. Mosca: I submit this letter in opposition to the above referenced comprehensive plan amendment and request that it be included in the materials provided to the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and that it be included as part of the official record for all hearings on the above referenced comprehensive plan amendment. My wife, Donna, and I are longtime residents of the Estates zoned area between Livingston Road and I -75. We live in a unique neighborhood. The zoning has always prohibited commercial development, except limited conditional uses. The Master Plan has always provided for the zoning to remain residential. The area is like a forest. The lots are large and the streets have little traffic. It is not unusual to see residents riding horses through the neighborhood. The residents enjoy the rural character of the neighborhood. That's why they live here. Since the announcement many years ago that a new intersection was being planned at Golden Gate Parkway and I -75, our residents have been concerned that the development of the interchange might lead to a proliferation of commercial and conditional uses. Our residents have consistently made our concerns known to local government leaders, and the response has consistently been that the interchange would be constructed because the community needs it, but that impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood would be minimized and the neighborhood would be protected from commercial development, recognizing that interchanges often lead to such development. February 16, 2007 Page 2 The interchange is now complete and developers, such as the applicant, have acquired or are actively acquiring properties along the Parkway for commercial development, despite the fact the area has a residential zoning designation. Our residents now ponder whether local government leaders will respect the concerns of our residents and the community and continue to maintain the policy of prohibiting commercial development in our neighborhood. I believe a review of past proceedings and events would be helpful to Collier County Government leaders in making their decision. In 2000, when various public meetings were occurring with respect to the proposed interchange, I and other residents met directly with Commissioners Constantine, Norris, Berry and Carter and each unequivocally expressed their desire and commitment that the area around the proposed interchange remain residential. I recall well Commissioner Constantine's remark to me that commuters could "go somewhere else for their gas." At the same time, I and other concerned residents had considerable contact with Mr. Ed Kant, the County's acting Transportation Services Director, who was representing the County in various public meetings. In a letter to me dated April 13, 2000, copy enclosed, Mr. Kant stated "the area surrounding the new interchange is not slated to be developed commercially as have the other interchanges. It is my understanding that the Board of County Commissioners is desirous of keeping the green space in this location and the semi -rural character of the neighborhood. This interchange will be one of the major gateways into the Collier County urban area. I believe it is the Board's intent that residents and visitors alike should see our best foot forward." I participated in a neighborhood group headed by Mr. Bob Stone and Mr. Herbert Cambridge. The group had concerns about the design of the interchange. Mr. Stone lost his house and property to accommodate a ramp for the interchange. Mr. Cambridge lost part of his frontage. I believe there were takings on 15 or more properties, including 5 homes. At that time, Commissioner Henning showed a great deal of interest in the group's concerns. In correspondence to Mr. Stone, Commissioner Henning stated "I am committed not to re -zone at the new interchange." I sincerely hope Commissioner Henning will maintain that commitment against the oncoming flood of development applications. I participated as a member of the County's Ad Hoc Committee established to provide input and guidance concerning the esthetic appearance of the Golden Gate Parkway Corridor and to coordinate with FDOT as it developed its plan for the interchange. The Committee gave particular attention to noise, lighting and buffering issues with the goal of minimizing impacts, recognizing the residential nature of the area and the close proximity of homes. I have been pleased of late to see the results of those efforts. I believe the County and FDOT have done a good job with the esthetic r February 16, 2007 Page 3 appearance of the Golden Gate Parkway Corridor and that this helps significantly to preserve the appeal of homes near the Parkway for residential use. Some property owners along the Parkway, recognizing the value of their homes as residences, have made sizable recent investments in buffering and remodeling their homes. Others are convinced their property will be rezoned commercial and are therefore holding back on improving their property. A clear signal from County leaders that the area will remain residential would be very helpful to the health and viability of the neighborhood. In February, 2003, the County's Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee considered appropriate changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan with respect to Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. At that time, and today, the Master Plan prohibited commercial uses in Estates zoned areas. Specifically, the Committee was considering how to deal with conditional uses. A petition from more than 60 neighborhood residents was presented to the Committee. A copy of the petition is enclosed. The petition expressed the residents' desire to "avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the interchange area ... by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded conditional uses, except essential services." In preparation for the February, 2003, meeting of the Committee, County Staff prepared and submitted a memorandum of background information. A copy of the memorandum is enclosed. The memorandum states, in part, "Since the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Commission approved the Golden Gate Parkway /1 -75 Interchange, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners has stated its intention not to allow commercial development in the vicinity of the planned highway interchange. However the history of interchanges along 1 -75 suggests that most interchanges are dominated by commercial uses (although the businesses therein may or r may not be successful)." The memorandum further quoted language from the "Toward Better Places, the Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida," which contains the following recommendation concerning the Golden Gate Parkway /I -75 interchange: "Develop plans for the land surroundine the future interchange of I -75 and Golden Gate Parkwav so that the interchange can provide a dramatic entry into Naples and Golden Gate instead of simply being a location for conventional interstate commercial uses." I and other concerned residents attended the meeting of the Restudy Committee and stated our desire that the area remain residential and that the County halt the proliferation of conditional uses. I recall there was no opposition to this. At that meeting the Restudy Committee considered and unanimously endorsed the staffs proposal. The Restudy Committee's changes to the Master Plan were subsequently approved with little modification by the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. As a result of the amendment process, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan contains the following policy statement as Policy 5.2.3 : February 16, 2007 Page 4 "Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planning I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subsection of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that exiting portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard." Also, as a result of the amendment process, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan contains the following requirement regarding conditional uses: "Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Further no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment shall be approved for conditional uses." It is important to note that the area was already zoned Estates, which already prohibited commercial use, and the Master Plan already had a residential designation for the area. The Restudy Committee, Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners could not propose or vote to make the area any more residential or any less commercial than it already was, but they obviously still wanted to do all they could, recognizing the impact of the interchange and the history of interchanges along I -75 being commercialized, to guide and empower future local government leaders and area residents to resist future efforts to commercialize the Golden Gate Parkway corridor. Policy 5.2.3 is a strong, honorable and well considered policy that the County, after due consideration and extensive process, adopted to protect our neighborhood and its residents from the potential future commercialization of the Parkway. Policy 5.2.3 was also adopted in the best interests of the citizens of Collier County, because the preservation of the rural, residential character of our neighborhood promotes that interest. Congestion around the interchange resulting from commercialization does not promote that interest. It would be extremely disappointing to see this Policy ignored or abrogated. Policy 5.2.3 was adopted in anticipation of the interchange and the widening of the Parkway. There are no new or unanticipated circumstances that would support whittling away at this Policy by making multiple exceptions for minor commercial subdistricts. I February 16, 2007 Page 5 Recently, a neighborhood information meeting was held where representatives of the applicants had the opportunity to present their plan and hear comments from the affected neighbors. The meeting was well attended and I am sure the record of the meeting will show that the attendees were overwhelmingly against the applicants' proposal. A couple of advocates in favor of commercialization spoke and said that commercialization was inevitable and the residents may as well accept that it is going to happen. I expect they were not aware of Policy 5.2.3 and the County's expressed commitment to prevent such commercialization. I note with appreciation that Mr. Ed Kant appeared at that meeting and expressed his concerns. His comment was that we, the concerned neighbors, should recognize that the proposed development at the corner of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway and the already approved development at the corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Golden Gate Parkway should be regarded as two bookends, and that if the applicants' proposal is approved, we should consider the possibility that all of the area between these two developments will eventually be filled in with commercial development. I commend Mr. Kant for his concern and the fact that he made the effort to attend this meeting even though he does not live in the area and is not directly affected. Mr. Kant is intimately familiar with the history of the interchange and, I believe, is interested in seeing that promises made to our residents when the interchange was proposed are kept. I believe it is noteworthy that the applicants purchased their property, presumably for residential purposes since it was zoned that way, in 2003 when it was certain that the interchange would be constructed and the Livingston Road and 1 -75 intersection would be, if it wasn't already, a busy traffic area. It is also noteworthy that the provisions of the Golden Gate Master Plan which the applicants seek to amend were all approved through public process subsequent to such purchase. I attended most, if not all, of the public hearings concerning the adoption of the new Master Plan. I do not recall the applicants or their representatives presenting any public comment. In fact, I recall there was little, if any, public opposition to the relevant provisions of the new Master Plan, and I believe the amendments were completely and unanimously supported by County decision makers. My wife and I and our neighbors feel that the applicants' proposal is the proverbial camel's nose under the tent. If the applicant is successful in amending the Master Plan as proposed, there will be, as Mr. Kant predicts, many similar future applications for commercial sub - districts along the Parkway and add on amendments to Policy 5.2.3. If the future land use designation and such a strong and recent statement of policy as Policy 5.2.3 is disregarded, one would have to question the purpose of having a Master Plan for Golden Gate Estates, and why such effort went into creating one. Will every five (5) acre nook and cranny near a major roadway or intersection in Golden Gate Estates ultimately be designated a specific commercial sub - district? February 16, 2007 Page 6 It is my hope that Collier County leaders will not yield to efforts to commercialize the Parkway and our neighborhood and will act decisively against the applicants' petition so as to discourage such efforts and preserve the rural residential character of our neighborhood and the extraordinary character of Collier County. Very truly yours, Thomas A. Collins, II e -mail: tcollins @swflalaw.com TAC /js Enc. P1Clients Transactions \Collins, Tom 3399 \Golden Gate Parkway\2 -15 -07 Itr. to Mosca.doe COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT April 13, 2000 Mr. Thomas A. Collins, II 2890 W Street SW Naples, FL 34105 Re: Public Workshop Meeting. April 20, 2000 I -75 /Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Dear Mr. Collins: 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRIAL. NAPLES, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8494 FAX: (941) 774 -5375 A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY Thank you for your letter dated April 11, 2000. In your letter you invited me to attend the subject meeting. Although I have a prior commitment for that evening, it does not begin until about 7:30. Therefore, I am pleased to report that I plan to attend for at least a short time. I also acknowledge being one of those suggesting the use of "backage" roads as access rather than close up "frontage" roads. In my letter to Mr. Williams of FDOT, which you enclosed with your neighborhood invitation, I set forth my reasoning, however, I am still open to neighborhood concerns and I look forward to an interesting and stimulating dialogue. Although not explicit in the letter mentioned above, based on my reading of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, the area surrounding the new interchange is not slated to be developed commercially as have the other interchanges. It is my understanding that the Board of County Commissioners is desirous of keeping the green space in this location and the semi -rural character of the neighborhood. This interchange will be one of the major gateways into the Collier County urban area. I believe it is the Board's intent that residents and visitors alike should see our best foot forward. 1 look forward to meeting you next Thursday. Very truly yours, Edward J. Kb!64 P.E. Transportation Services Director cc: Thomas W. 011iff, County Manager (w /copy of Collins correspondence) Edward N. Finn, Public Works Administrator (w /copy of Collins correspondence) Dale A. Bathon, P.E., Traffic Operations Manager (w /copy of Collins correspondence) Gavin Jones, P.E., Transportation Planning Manager (w /copy of Collins correspondence) File: GGP /I -75 Interchange I -75 INTERCHANGE AT GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND SURROUNDING AREA February 26, 2003 Background: Since the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Commission approved the Golden Gate Parkway /I -75 Interchange, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners has stated its intention not to allow commercial development in the vicinity of the planned highway interchange. However, the history of interchanges along I -75 suggests that most interchanges are dominated by commercial land uses (although the businesses therein may or may not be successful). Therefore, the purpose of this report is to: 1) Determine the types of land uses that are acceptable to the residents of the area surrounding the planned interchange; and 2) Include language supporting such uses within the amended Golden Gate Area Master Plan. — The Community Character Plan: "Toward Better Places, The Community Character Plan For Collier County, Florida," contains the following recommendation concerning the Golden Gate Parkway /I -75 Interchange: "Develop a plan for the land surrounding the future interchange of I -75 and Golden Gate Parkway so that the interchange can provide a dramatic entry into Naples and Golden Gate instead of simply being a location for conventional interstate commercial uses." There are two parts of this recommendation. At the Restudy Committee meeting, The Golden Gate/ I -75 Ad Hoc Beautification Committee will make a presentation discussing the proposed landscaping for the interchange itself. The Beautification Committee's work represents the "dramatic entry" portion of the Community Character Plan's recommendation. However, the second part of the recommendation is to prevent the land surrounding the interchange from becoming "a location for conventional interstate commercial uses." It follows then that such uses would not be allowed in the interchange area, and this is the position officially taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Staff is proposing to address this position through a new policy statement. This policy would be amended to the GGAMP as Policy 1.4.2, and would read as follows: "Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses contained within the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no commercial re- zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between 66th Street, SW and 60th Street, SW. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment shall be allowed to rezone for commercial uses." A large aerial photograph, depicting the subject area will be viewable at the Restudy Commnittee meeting. Policy Implications: Currently, the provisions of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan would not allow commercial uses along the subject portion of Golden Gate Boulevard, nor along its tributary network of streets. It is possible for a property owner or developer to attempt to amend the GGAMP to allow commercial uses (subject to a subsequent rezone petition). There are currently no commercially zoned properties within the subject area. There are, however, commercial uses within two blocks west of 66th Street, SW. These include a proposed commercial gymnasium and a meeting hall for hire (the bingo parlor). Traditionally, residents along Golden Gate Parkway (in the Estates) have been resistant to commercial amendments or rezones and the Board of County Commissioners has generally bowed to their (the residents') wishes. However, with the interchange coming to the area, the pressure on Board members to allow commercial uses within the interchange area will increase. The proposed policy would then provide a declaration of both the County Commission's and the community's intent not to allow commercial in the interchange area. Having such a policy statement as part of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan may make it more difficult for a future Board of County Commissioners to approve commercial land use amendments or rezones in the subject area. Staff Recommendation: The Restudy Committee should recommend that the above policy statement be included in the Second Phase Restudy Amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 2 I TO: The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy Committee (the "Committee") and the Collier County Commission (the "Commission "). FROM: Residents of the Estates Designation Area near the Golden Gate Parkway and I -75 interchange (the "Interchange Area "). The Committee has decided to study possible changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan relative to the Estates designation area in the Interchange Area. We hereby express to the Committee our desire to avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the Interchange Area. Presently there is little opportunity for Conditional Uses to be approved within the Interchange Area. This is because the Master Plan currently requires that: "Conditional uses (except essential services) shall not be permitted: On Golden Gate Parkway within the Estates Designation Area west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, unless the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights -of -ways or waterways." There are few, if any, circumstances where this requirement can presently be met. We would like the Committee and Commission to either keep the Master Plan the way it presently is, or make it more restrictive - perhaps by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded Conditional Uses, except essential services. Your kind consideration of this matter is appreciated. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS "2,y1J' lEth SY Jv � �J LL ',�i.'I� i �� /�j -.•l.: tl /� ��:��/j I V�V "VI��L�AY� � °�� 4;.Y� i 'V jXlr ? _ .I /,C !'VL i`, r:l, i �% ii . i`� � ,,i —(- SIGNATURE I PRINT NAME ADDRESS L 7L T I -s)- -S ",/, N U\J TO: The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy Committee (the "Committee") and the Collier County Commission (the "Commission'). FROM: Residents of the Estates Designation Area near the Golden Gate Parkway and I -75 interchange (the "Interchange Area "). The Committee has decided to study possible changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan relative to the Estates designation area in the Interchange Area. We hereby express to the Committee our desire to avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the Interchange Area. Presently there is little opportunity for Conditional Uses to be approved within the Interchange Area. This is because the Master Plan currently requires that: "Conditional uses (except essential services) shall not be permitted: On Golden Gate Parkway within the Estates Designation Area west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, unless the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights -of -ways or waterways." There are few, if any, circumstances where this requirement can presently be met. We would like the Committee and Commission to either keep the Master Plan the way it presently is, or make it more restrictive - perhaps by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded Conditional Uses, except essential services. Your kind consideration of this matter is appreciated. PRINT NAME ADDRESS RA AA t-0 SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS 7 lei, ,,� N�� %�,. %- ✓N v � / -SD "�� •S, � , / r-�, 4z 3O -AD 'C/G (-j TO: The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy Committee (the "Committee ") and the Collier County Commission (the "Commission "). FROM: Residents of the Estates Designation Area near the Golden Gate Parkway and I -75 interchange (the "Interchange Area "). The Committee has decided to study possible changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan relative to the Estates designation area in the Interchange Area. We hereby express to the Committee our desire to avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the Interchange Area. Presently there is little opportunity for Conditional Uses to be approved within the Interchange Area. This is because the Master Plan currently requires that: "Conditional uses (except essential services) shall not be permitted: On Golden Gate Parkway within the Estates Designation Area west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, unless the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights -of -ways or waterways." There are few, if any, circumstances where this requirement can presently be met. We would like the Committee and Commission to either keep the Master Plan the way it presently is, or make it more restrictive - perhaps by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded Conditional Uses, except essential services. Your kind consideration of this matter is appreciated. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS �j ��e��'✓�r K� � >��.L�, -- ��y,�c��.� ?Z -ICS � 5i 5b-) y�U J L PRINT NAME ADDRESS %SV 3:k;!-) 6627" srI— 50i O .lJ ., o, 6.- I - 31 yS (, sf 5 3i. /s- �los�51J t rL JTSc,) 3` IIS VdiD�GS �%3v�cxS k- -3 yrO;S-- TO: The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy Committee (the "Committee ") and the Collier County Commission (the "Commission "). FROM: Residents of the Estates Designation Area near the Golden Gate Parkway and I -75 interchange (the "Interchange Area "). The Committee has decided to study possible changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan relative to the Estates designation area in the Interchange Area. We hereby express to the Committee our desire to avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the Interchange Area. Presently there is little opportunity for Conditional Uses to be approved within the Interchange Area. This is because the Master Plan currently requires that: "Conditional uses (except essential services) shall not be permitted: On Golden Gate Parkway within the Estates Designation Area west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, unless the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights -of -ways or waterways." There are few, if any, circumstances where this requirement can presently be met. We would like the Committee and Commission to either keep the Master Plan the way it presently is, or make it more restrictive - perhaps by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded Conditional Uses, except essential services. Your kind consideration of this matter is appreciated. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS 1T1 Str Sw s�.s.� TO: The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy Committee (the "Committee") and the Collier County Commission (the "Commission "). FROM: Residents of the Estates Designation Area near the Golden Gate Parkway and I -75 interchange (the "Interchange Area "). The Committee has decided to study possible changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan relative to the Estates designation area in the Interchange Area. We hereby express to the Committee our desire to avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the Interchange Area. Presently there is little opportunity for Conditional Uses to be approved within the Interchange Area. This is because the Master Plan currently requires that: "Conditional uses (except essential services) shall not be permitted: On Golden Gate Parkway within the Estates Designation Area west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, unless the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights -of -ways or waterways." There are few, if any, circumstances where this requirement can presently be met. We would like the Committee and Commission to either keep the Master Plan the way it presently is, or make it more restrictive - perhaps by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded Conditional Uses, except essential services. Your kind consideration of this matter is appreciated. ,,IGNA -TURF PRINT NAME ADDRESS L4'(.w,. �(.�GG �L�'i✓ G'o Gi.- ✓ /G�CGy � �// G �/ /� ..�. S. ii. j�Z.S uz�1,f TO: The Golden Gate Master Plan Restudy Committee (the "Committee") and the Collier County Commission (the "Commission "). FROM: Residents of the Estates Designation Area near the Golden Gate Parkway and I -75 interchange (the "Interchange Area "). The Committee has decided to study possible changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan relative to the Estates designation area in the Interchange Area. We hereby express to the Committee our desire to avoid and restrict the growth of non - residential development within the Interchange Area. Presently there is little opportunity for Conditional Uses to be approved within the Interchange Area. This is because the Master Plan currently requires that: "Conditional uses (except essential services) shall not be permitted: On Golden Gate Parkway within the Estates Designation Area west of Santa Barbara Boulevard, unless the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights -of -ways or waterways." There are few, if any, circumstances where this requirement can presently be met. We would like the Committee and Commission to either keep the Master Plan the way it presently is, or make it more restrictive - perhaps by entirely prohibiting any new or expanded Conditional Uses, except essential services. Your kind consideration of this matter is appreciated. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS A(Q &-I s �36� 3 �� Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Bill Confoy [wconfoy @swfla.rr.com] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 7:38 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Livingston Rd. & GGP Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red As you know the Townsends have petitioned the County to convert their corner property from residential to Commercial. They envision a medical office bldg. I envision it a residence like those to the north & east. Who would be naive enough to not believe that the sole purpose in acquiring this property was to convert it to commercial in lieu of maintaining it as s residence? It was a gamble on their part & neither the planning commission nor the commissioners shd allow this to happen. The community made it quite clear two or so years ago that GGP,from Santa Barbara to Liv Rd, shd remain residential. GGP will have an exit on 1 -75 shortly & will become the major gateway to the city. That gateway shd be a street of nicely landscaped homes (ala Liv. rd) & not a series of commercial bldg's (like Pine Ridge) so as to reinforce the Naples image the County has fostered. It is obvious that if you let this thru,the rest of GGP will fall to the same fate as well as homes on Liv Rd to the north of Townsend's. A promise to the Community should remain just that! Bill Confoy wconfoy @- swfla_rr_com 2/26/2007 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Libby Biehl [Libby @weberdesigngroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 2:12 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Amendments to the Gold Gate Parkway Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Dear Ms. Mosca: I am very concerned about the information I have received in the mail recently regarding amendments to the Golden Gate Master Plan. I live very close to the new 1 -75 interchange and one of my major concerns before the project even started was the area around my residence becoming more commercial instead of residential. The project is not even completed and businesses are already gearing up to make changes. I understand the need to update and give Golden Gate City a face lift as it were, but those areas are already commercial in nature. I believe once the door is opened to commercial use amendments in and around the new exchange it will provide an opportunity for future arguments to only expand the commercial properties into more of the residential areas. This has a potential for lowing real estate values in our area. Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan Between Golden Gate parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Blvd. Townsend — Object David Lawrence — Object Colonnade — Object Thankyou Mary Biehl 3205 60t' Street SW Naples, Florida 34116 2/23/2007 Page I of 1 -- MoscaMichele From: J.D. Loden, LUTC Ud @jdlodenfinancial.com] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 5:28 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Livingstion GG Parkway Amendment Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red I would like to formally register my objection to any change in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. More specifically concerning the proposed amendment for the NORTHEAST comer of Golden Gate PKWY and Livingston. 1- Any amendment, or modified change would certainly create an opening for other "residential" property owners to do the same, 2- The area is a unique neighborhood of single family homes with acreage; much like the homes found North of Pine Ridge and Livingston. These properties include sensitive natural habit and foliage including Cypress Trees. Our neighborhood supports cover for Red Fox, Bobcats, and even a few gators on the various lakes. As you know commercialization would not stop. I don't believe the Colliers or the Sutton Families would allow such commercial development near their horse farms on Daniels or the vacinity. Thank you for your consideration. J.D. Loden, Lute Past performance does not guarantee future results Comprehensive Business & Personal Financial Planning Services Securities offered through Investors Capital Corporation Member NASD /SIPC 230 Broadway, Lynnfield MA 01940 800 - 949 -1422. 201 8th St. South, Suite 306 Naples, FI 34102 239 -430 -0104 FAX 239 -430 -0105 WEBSITE wwwjdlodenfinancial_.co_m 2/23/2007 From: Edward J. Kant [mailto:b- e.kant @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:27 PM To: 'lindabedtelyon @colliergov.net' Subject: NIM Paul Schwartz of Colonnade Group - 2/1/07 Linda: Unfortunately, I have a conflict and will be unable to attend the subject NIM I have no financial interest in any property in that area and I do not represent any other individual or group except myself. I would like to record to reflect that I am opposed to this request for a GMP Amendment. I believe that the long -term intent of the framers of the Comp Plan was to preserve the Golden Gate Parkway Corridor (knowing that an interchange could be a real possibility at some point in time) from the rampant commercial growth seen along the other 1 -75 interchange approach corridors in Collier County (Immokalee Road, Pine Ridge Road, CR 951/SR 84). 1 have spoken against this type of change in the past and will continue to do so as I believe it is in the best interests of the County that this corridor remain free of additional commercial development due to the ultimate lack of roadway capacity that will result.. This area is currently zoned Estates and the Comp Plan indicates, I believe, a continued residential use. There are already a number of non - residential uses along the corridor and given Collier County's transportation network, especially in that area, I believe that adding the potential for increased traffic would not be a good public policy direction. Thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion. Edward J. Kant, P.E. 1910 Mission Drive Naples, FL 34109 239 - 598 -3123 b -e. kant(cilcomcast. net Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: DJ2790 @aol.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:49 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Changes to Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Ms. Mosca, As residents of Unit 29 on 68th ST SW, my wife and I are emailing you to object to any changes to the Policy 5.2.3 of the Golden Gate master plan that would allow commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Santa Barbara Boulevard and Livingston Road. I specifically object to the Colonnade project, the Townsend project and the David Lawrence Center. Please register our objection to any changes to this Policy 5.2.3 of the G G Master Plan. Thank You, Daniel W. and Saskia Jenkins 2720 68th ST SW Naples, FL 34105 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Kevin Carmichael [kemacar @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:46 AM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Golden Gate Comprenhensive Growth Management Plan - Opposition to Commercial Rezoning Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red DEAR MS MOSCA: 1 AM A CONCERNED PROPERTY OWNER AND PARENT. AS A NAPLES RESIDENT FOR 7 YEARS, I HAVE SEEN GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY GO FROM A 4 LANE COUNTRY ROAD WITH NO TRAFFIC LIGHTS AND NO STREET LIGHTS, TO A 6 LANE MAIN ROAD WITH A 75 INTERCHANGE EXIT TWO BLOCKS FROM MY STREET. NEEDLESS TO SAY WEARS NOT HAPPY. THERE IS EXTENSIVE CONSTRUCTION GOING ON ALL AROUND US. GOOD EXAMPLES ARE DAVIS BLVD. AND 951 TOWARDS MARCO, WHERE EVERYTHING ON BOTH SIDES IS BEING TORNED DOWN TO ALLOW MORE SPACE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. NAPLES AS WE KNEW IT IS NO MORE. THE REASONS WE MOVE HERE FROM MIAMI'S DADE COUNTY ARE DISAPPEARING. WE DO NOT WANT OUR BACKYARD TO BECOME A CORRIDOR OF GAS STATIONS AND OFFICE BUILDINGS. WE WANT GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY FROM SANTA BARBARA TO L/V /NGSTON RD. TO REMA /NRES /DENT /AL. THIS HAS BECOME AN ALL TOO FREQUENT TOPIC OF DISCUSSION AT THE DINNER TABLE. MY THREE CHILDREN AGES 14, 9, AND 5, ARE BOTH SCARED AND CONCERNED ABOUT ALL THE CHANGES GOING ON. MY 9 YEAR OLD IS EVEN HAVING BAD DREAMS ABOUT ALL OF THIS AS 1 AM ALSO. PLEASE 1 BEG YOU TO DO EVERYTHING IN YOUR POWER TO STOP FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARKWAY. MY CHILDREN THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. MARIA CARMICHAEL.(RESIDENT AND OWNER, 2810 66TH ST. SW) 2/26/2007 MoscaMichele From: Bill Johnston [admbi1133 @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:17 AM To: MoscaMichele Subject: > Re: Change in the comprehensive land use plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Dear Ms Mosca, My name is Fred W Johnston and my property on Golden Gtae Parkway has been severly impacted by widening of the parkway and the large increases in traffic. I fully support the proposed land use change and think it should include many more areas on the parkway. Sincerely Fred W Johnston 6918 SW 30th Way Gainesville FL 32608 PH 352 335 2377 Be a PS3 game guru. Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. http: / /videogames. yahoo .com /platform ?platform= 120121 1 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Billpinusa @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:55 AM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Comprehensive Land Change G. G. Pky Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Dear Ms. Mosca, I hope all is well. My name is Bill Johnston and I am a property owner on Golden Gate Parkway. My Property on Golden Gate Parkway has been severely impacted by the widening of the Parkway. I fully support the proposed change in the comprehensive land use plan for Golden Gate Parkway. Thank you for your time with this issue. All the best, Bill Johnston 334 Hamilton Shore Dr. Winter Haven, FL 33881 2/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 2— MoscaMichele From: Jeff ogibson40 @swfla.rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 6:24 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: March 5th hearing on Growth Management Plan Amendments Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Blue Michele, We are writing to you to voice our support for the Comprehensive Land Plan Amendment that the Planning Commission is scheduled to hear on March 5th, 2007. Both my nephew (Norman Garcia) and I, own property directly on the Southwest Corner of the new Golden Gate Parkway / 1 -75 Interchange. The address of these properties is 63rd St. SW. Due to the new interchange, access to our property is no longer accessible from 64th St. SW, and is now only accessible from further west at 66th St. SW. To access our property, one must enter on 66th St. SW, turn left on the newly constructed road behind Centerpoint Church, cross over 64th St. SW, and then get on 631d St. SW. This has significantly diminished our property value. Since Collier County has allowed this reduction in our property value to happen, we are both in support of the Amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan, so that we can now, also get the highest and best use for our property. We both are planning to attend the meeting on March 5th Our contact information is as follows Jeff Gibson 239 - 595 -7668 Email: igibson40 @swfla.rr.com Norman Garcia PDELH1 @AOL COM Sincerely, Jeffrey Cji6son Norman Garcia 2/26/2007 MoscaMichele From: Steve Gunden [sgunden @swfla.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 12:41 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Golden Gate Parkway Zoning Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Michele, I didn't realize the deadline to include comments in the CCPC package had passed. Regardless, I would still like to voice my opinion regarding the proposed zoning changes and plan amendments currently being considered by the Commission. I reside at 3210 66th Street SW with my wife. We purchased here in 1981 and built our home almost 25 years ago. We have raised our children in this neighborhood. During this time we have relied on wells for domestic /potable water and septic tanks for our waste disposal. Unit 29 of Golden Gate Estates lies east of the City of Naples utilities distribution territory. When Avatar provided utilities for Golden Gate City, we were outside of the boundaries of their service area too. Collier County Utilities does not have any central systems in the GG Parkway corridor. As you may be aware, there is a City of Naples raw water main on the south side of that roadway. Recently the Parkway was upgraded to 6 lanes with many improvements including dual sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, irrigation and street lights. No provisions to install central water or sewer were included in the work program. Interestingly, the water management system was permitted on private lands (all of our front yard swales). The "water quality" .....treatment system is within 200' of many of my neighbors drinking water systems. I have Dejected to this system from the first day I was made aware that the SFWMD permitted the work. Guess where the new commercial parcels will drain? Yes, into that same swale that passes by our front yards into the Golden Gate Canal. How can theycet permits to use the same system that the County is using for dry detention? -Wh- is going -to ensure that the water in our private wells is safe for potable and dom, _ic_use? How can someone purchase a property with /existing zoning and expet or demand that it be changed to satisfy their business plan? I.�would agree to allow D vid Lawrence to expand their water management system on their apds (passive use). As far as the other two petitions, I cannot support either argi ent. Wyndemere obtained a conditional or provisional use for the Townsend house en that sales center (and adjacent utility plant) was opened in the late 70's or early 80' If that's expired, and I'm sure it has, then guess what, it's Estates Zoning. i Should the argument be presented that the commer se would bring central water to the area, that has no bearing. They too, like the many churches in the corridor, can provide well and septic. I do not wish to pay impact fees, hook up to central systems and pay to abandon my systems just because we need another Mobil station and a Burger King for folks traveling on I -75. Let them get off at any of the other 3 exits (101, 107 and 111) within 10 miles of each other. Steve and Debbie Gunden 3210 66th Street SW Naples, FL 34105 239.262.0142 4o virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/691 - Release Date: 2/17/2007 5:06 PM 1 Page 1 of 1 MoscaMichele From: Dolly Roberts [dolly @dbr- marketing.com] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:03 PM To: MoscaMichele Subject: Policy 5.2.3 of Golden Gate Master Plan Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Please register our objection to Planning Commission Approval of any change to the above - referenced policy that would allow new commercial use along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, including the Townsend and Colonnade projects. We do, however, support the proposed expansion effort for the David Lawrence Center. Thank you so much for your consideration. Eugenie B. & Donald A. Roberts 2840 68th St. SW Naples, FL 34105 2/26/2007