CE-Intersection Safety Minutes 10/23/2009
October 23,2009
MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
INTERSECTION SAFETY PROGRAM
Naples, Florida, October 23,2009
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Special Magistrate Intersection
Safety Program, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F,"
3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida with the following
persons present:
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: Honorable Brenda Garretson
ALSO PRESENT: Jeff Wright, Assistant County Attorney
Jennifer Waldron, Code Enforcement Supervisor
1
October 23, 2009
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Hearing was called to order at 9:00 AM by the Honorable Special Magistrate
Brenda Garretson. All those testifying at the proceeding did so under oath.
A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Magistrate Garretson.
Special Magistrate Garretson noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the
Respondents were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating
Officer(s) and view the video recording; the goal is to obtain compliance without
being punitive.
RECESS: 9:12 AM
RECONVENED: 9:46 AM
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA I
I
Jennifer Waldron, Code Enforcement Supervisor, noted the following changes:
(a) Under Item III (A), "Hearings," the following cases were DISMISSED by the
County:
. Agenda #3, Notice #1360900041648 - BCC vs. Amy Anderson
. Agenda #4, Notice #1360900044253 - BCC vs. Daniel R. Anderson
. Agenda #5, Notice #1360900022143 - BCC vs. Dominick Andreoli
. Agenda #7, Notice #1360900008761- BCC vs. Leonel Baca
. Agenda #8, Notice #1360900009991 - BCC vs. Leonel Baca
. Agenda #9, Notice #1360900014546 - BCC vs. Mohammed A. Barrie
. Agenda #11, Notice #1360900006310 - BCC vs. Antoine E. Bernard
. Agenda #14, Notice #1360900040442 - BCC vs. Scott Michael Carter
. Agenda #16, Notice #1360900051670 - BCC vs. Jennifer L. Didonato Pucci
. Agenda #20, Notice #1360900027753 - BCC vs. Gold Medal Growers, Inc.
. Agenda #21, Notice #1360900002442 - BCC vs. Mark M. Goldsworthy
. Agenda #23, Notice #1360900035985 - BCC vs. Interstate Brands Corp.
. Agenda #25, Notice #1360900050896 - BCC vs. Keith Robert Jennings
. Agenda #27, Notice #1360900007292 - BCC vs. Kirk Steven and Melissa L.
Jordan
. Agenda #29, Notice #1360900047629 - BCC vs. Wayne F. Korn or Maria
Dolores Molter
. Agenda #30, Notice #1360900013985 - BCC vs. Benjamin Krick
. Agenda #33, Notice #1360900052090 - BCC vs. Hristo and Liljana
Mangovski
. Agenda #35, Notice #1360900033884 - BCC vs. Jessie D. Milton
. Agenda #36, Notice #1360900012045 - BCe vs. Dale J. Oleff
. Agenda #37, Notice #1360900040145 - BCC vs. Frances Pro celli
. Agenda #39, Notice #1360900015329 - BCC vs. Teresa M. Reisiz
. Agenda #43, Notice #1360900006278 - BCC vs. Armalin Phillip Richardson
. Agenda #48, Notice #1360900001196 - BCC vs. Marie Lourdes Staco
. Agenda #49, Notice #1360900027613 - BCC vs. Christian M. Tobin
2
October 23,2009
. Agenda #52, Notice #1360900010874 - BCC vs. Zulima Alfaro Turino
. Agenda #53, Notice #1360900004471- BCC vs. Linda Wetzel
. Agenda #54, Notice #1360900015915 - BCC vs. Steven Robert Whittaker
and Marisol Soledad
. Agenda #55, Notice #1360900006203 - BCC vs. David D. Wolff
The Special Magistrate approved the Agenda as amended, subject to changes made
during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Magistrate.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Hearings:
2. Notice #1360900012391 - BCC vs. AlC Electric Service of SW FL. Inc.
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was represented by Anthony
Carlone, the owner.
The County was represented by Officer Dan Salls.
Mr. Carlone resides at 6017 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, Florida 34119, and verified the
Corporation is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: August 12, 2009
Time: 9:01 AM
Location: Intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road @ US 411Tamiami Trail N.
The Respondent reviewed the video and stated he was not driving the vehicle at the
time of the violation. He further stated the Corporation employs 22 individuals and
owns 15 vehicles which are numbered. He noted the video did not show the specific
identification number of the vehicle. He questioned whether he should be responsible
for payment ofthe fines since he was not the driver. He further questioned how the
Citation could be issued since no Officer was present, only a camera.
The Special Magistrate viewed the video and stated Citations are issued to the owners
of the vehicles, not the drivers. She explained a video is reviewed by an Officer who
determines if a Citation is to be issued based on whether or not a violation occurred.
The Respondent objected to the process and noted a "warning" notice would probably
have been issued if an Officer had been present, and there was no "proper signage" at
the intersection alerting drivers to presence of the cameras.
The Special Magistrate stated that "points" were not assessed to the drivers' licenses
and the County was not required by Florida Statutes to post signs at each intersection
where cameras are present, but some signs have been posted as a courtesy.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
3
October 23,2009
Total Amount Due: $175.00
6. Notice #1360900039527 - BCC vs. Brenda Aviles
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi.
The Respondent resides at 10581 Regent's Circle, Naples, Florida 34109, and verified
she is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: August 29,2009 I
Time: 11 :03 PM Location: Intersection of Pine Ridge Road @ Livingston Road.
The video was reviewed by the Respondent and the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent stated she did brake and the video showed her brake lights were "on"
and she proceeded with caution into the intersection under a turning arrow. She
further stated it was late at night and no oncoming cars were present.
The Special Magistrate pointed out a large, white van was present two lanes over
from the turning lane and appeared to block the view. She questioned how the driver
could have seen around the other vehicle.
The Respondent stated she could see down the road for a long distance and, as she
approached the intersection, she slowed the speed of her car and did brake. She
stated she could clearly see the traffic light and the lights of other cars. She admitted
her vehicle crossed the white line in order to proceed into the intersection.
Lt. Harold Minch, Collier County Sheriffs Office, stated the Statutes require a
vehicle to fully stop at the white line prior to entering the intersection. He pointed out
the Respondent's vehicle did not come to a full stop and it was determined that a
violation had occurred.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUlL TY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay a fine of $125.00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
The Special Magistrate stated the Respondent was allowed 30 days to pay the fine.
** Supervisor Jen Waldron stated each Respondent will receive an Order via U.S.
Mail Delivery within one to two weeks after the Hearing and asked that payment not
be made until the Order had been received. She confirmed payment would not be
accepted during the Hearing.
The Special Magistrate corrected the previouslv stated time frame to 21 days.
4
October 23, 2009
12. Notice #1360900017952 - BCC vs. Randall J. Betten
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Michael Peabody.
The Respondent resides at 362 Trade Winds, Naples, Florida, and verified he is
the registered owner ofthe vehicle.
Date of Violation: August 16,2009
Time: 8:26 PM
Location: Intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road @ US 411Tamiami Trail N. I
The Respondent stated he had reviewed the video but was unsure of his plea.
The Respondent stated he had received an initial Citation for $125.00 which he paid,
and noted his daughter had been home from college on the date of the first Citation.
He received a second Citation for the same location dated two days later. He further
stated his daughter had no idea she was in violation and, if an officer had been present
on the first occasion to either issue a warning or a Citation, she would have been
alerted and the violation would not have occurred a second time. He admitted the
vehicle did not stop completely but came to a "rolling" stop.
The Special Magistrate reviewed the video and noted no "passes" (i.e., exceptions)
are allowed concerning observing traffic laws. She stated the vehicle was in violation
of the Ordinance.
The Special Magistrate ruled since the Respondent pleaded "in violation" prior to
the Hearing, costs would not be assessed.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00.
Total Amount Due: $125.00
13. Notice #1360900051993 - BCC vs. Christopher P. Brav
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present and confirmed that
he is an attorney.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi.
The Respondent resides at 12840 Brynn Wood Way, Naples, Florida 34105, and
verified he is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: September 6, 2009
Time: 7:05 AM
Location: Intersection of Pine Ridge Road @ Livingston Road
The Respondent stated he was unaware of the availability to review the video until he
5
October 23, 2009
arrived at the Hearing, pled "not guilty," and stated that based on the Notice, it
appeared that he was not in violation. The paragraph disclosing the availability to
view the video (located on the second page ofthe Notice) was printed in very small
font. He based his plea on the still photographic evidence printed on the front of the
Citation.
Lt. Harold Minch recited the referenced paragraph from the Notice and noted the
images were available "on line." He stated the pin number was printed on the front of
the Citation and suggested a request could be made to use a larger font for printing.
The Respondent stated he interpreted "recorded images" to refer to the still
photographs on the face of the Citation. He further stated he would have mailed a
check, rather than appear, ifhe knew he had access to the recorded evidence.
The Special Magistrate stated it appeared the tires of the Respondent's vehicle were
on the white line which was, in fact, a violation of the Ordinance.
The Respondent and the Special Magistrate reviewed the video.
The Respondent amended his plea to "guilty."
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUlL TY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay a fine of $125.00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00 within 21 days "from the written order. "
Total Amount Due: $175.00
19. Notice #1360900008779 - BCC vs. Denna L. Fiorito
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Dan Salls.
The Respondent resides at 3575 El Verdado Court, Naples, Florida 34109, and
verified she is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: August 6, 2009
Time: 9:36 AM
Location: Intersection Vanderbilt Beach Road @ US 41/Tamiami Trail N.
The Respondent stated she had received a "Delinquent Notice" but had never
received the initial Citation. She pleaded "in violation."
The Respondent stated her mother had called her that morning because her father was
very ill and she was driving to their home. He passed away two hours later. She
produced a copy of the Certified Death Certificate.
The Special Magistrate stated she would take Judicial Notice ofthe document.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
6
October 23,2009
NOT GUILTY of the alleged violation by the Special Magistrate due to extenuating
circumstances.
** Supervisor Waldron reported:
. Agenda #22, Notice #1360900015253 -BCCvs. George Harvey and
Patricia Sue Hermanson had been DISMISSED by the County.
26. Notice #1360900052835 - BCC vs. Jonathan Jimenez
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi.
The Respondent resides at 2224 Flora Avenue, Fort Myers, Florida 33907 and
verified he is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: September 6, 2009
Time: 9:46 AM
Location: Intersection of Airport-Pulling Road @ Immokalee Road
The Respondent stated he was not sure how to plead.
The Special Magistrate and the Respondent reviewed the video.
The Respondent stated he paid attention to the car in front of his and thought he had
stopped.
The Special Magistrate stated it appeared the vehicle had slowed down to break, but
did not come to a full stop.
The Respondent requested the "name of the offense by law" that he was charged
with.
The Special Magistrate cited Section Three of the Ordinance entitled "Adherence to
Traffic Controls" as follows:
"(a) Steady red traffic light. The driver (operator) of a vehicle shall not
allow any portion of the front most part of that vehicle to encroach over
a vertical extension of the nearest part of the intersection, intersection line,
crosswalk line, or "stop here on red" line, as applicable ... "
The Respondent asked if there were other options besides paying the fines, i.e., if
community service could be substituted in lieu of money.
The Special Magistrate noted the Ordinance did not provide for options and stated no
points would be assessed against his license.
The Respondent was visibly upset and stated he was unable to pay the fines.
She suggested the Respondent contact the Collier County Board of Commissioners in
writing to explain his situation and request special consideration. He was directed to
the BCC Office to obtain the mailing address.
7
- -
October 23,2009
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
The Special Magistrate CONTINUED the case to February, 2010, and stated the
Respondent will be notified of the specific Hearing date.
24. Notice #1360900032563 - BCC vs. Interstate Brands Corp.
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was represented by Angel
DeJesus.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi.
The Respondent resides at 2378 Magnolia Avenue and verified the Corporation is the
registered owner ofthe vehicle. He stated he is the Corporation's local Sales
Representative and authorized to represent the Corporation at the Hearing.
Date of Violation: August 27,2009
Time: (not stated)
Location: Intersection of Airport-Pulling Road @ Immokalee Road
The Respondent pleaded "not guilty."
The Special Magistrate and the Respondent viewed the video.
The Respondent pointed out his vehicle came to a complete stop before the white
line, the time was 4:00 AM, and he thought he had a green turning arrow. He stated
he has driven the same route for three years and is aware of the traffic signals.
Lt. Minch stated there is a turning arrow at the intersection.
The Special Magistrate questioned the Respondent regarding his "customary
practice" of driving, i.e., ifhe usually came to a full stop at traffic signals regardless
of whether there were turning arrows.
The Respondent answered affirmatively.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
NOT GUILTY of the alleged violation by the Special Magistrate.
28. Notice #1360900043172 - BCC vs. Kevin John Klimek
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Dan Salls
The Respondent resides at 4412 Preserve Way, Naples, Florida 34109, and verified
he is the registered owner of the vehicle.
s
October 23, 2009
Date of Violation: September 1, 2009
Time: 6:45 AM
Location: Intersection of Airport-Pulling Road @ Immokalee Road
The video was reviewed by the Special Magistrate.
The Respondent stated he was not driving the vehicle at the time of the incident and
had allowed one of two people to operate his car. He noted rental car companies
were allowed to identify, in writing, the driver who rented their vehicle as cited page
two of the Citation. He questioned why a rental car agency could receive an
exemption that was not granted in the Code. He referenced Section Two ofthe
Citation ("ways to contest the violation") which stated it was "presumed" the owner
of the vehicle was also the driver. He stated he felt his "Due Process" rights as a
citizen had been violated because he was innocent until "presumed" guilty versus
being innocent until "proven" guilty.
Lt. Minch stated if a rental car company is cited for a traffic infraction, the procedure
is for the company to pay the fine and bill the amount to the individual who leased the
vehicle.
The Respondent cited a portion of the Citation as follows:
"If you are a rental car company, send your letter identifying the driver
along with this Notice of Code Violation to Collier County. "
He cited the example of a speeding ticket where the driver receives the Citation, not
the owner ofthe vehicle. He sent a letter, via Certified Mail, asking the County to
provide further evidence to prove he was the driver of the vehicle. He claimed the
process was not fair to the citizens of Collier County. The response he received was
to appear at the Hearing.
The following items were admitted into evidence:
. Respondent's Exhibit "A" - copy of the Respondent's letter to the County
. Respondent's Exhibit "B" - certified mailing receipt
. Respondent's Exhibit "c" - proof of delivery from the U.S. Postal Service
The Special Magistrate stated she would be willing to continue the case in order for
the Respondent to obtain an attorney and would also notify the County Attorney's
office.
The Special Magistrate explained the Respondent was alleged to have violated the
law and the County fulfilled its obligation by notifying him in a timely manner.
The Respondent questioned whether or not there was a separate turning arrow at the
intersection, and Lt. Minch replied in the negative.
The Special Magistrate ruled that based on the evidence presented in the video the
Respondent was in violation.
9
October 23,2009
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
** Supervisor Waldron reported:
. Agenda #51, Notice #1360900009371 - BCC vs. Zulima Alfaro Turino and
. Agenda #56, Notice #1360900041044 -BCCvs. MarjorieA. Ziff-Levine
had been DISMISSED by the County.
38. Notice #1360900013183 - BCC vs. Michael Edwin and Janet Marak Posch
The Hearing was requested by the Respondents. Respondent Michael E. Posch was
present and represented his wife, Janet Marak Posch.
The County was represented by Officer Chris Gonzalez.
The Respondents reside at 27150 Del Lane, Bonita Springs, Florida, and verified he is
the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: August 13,2009
Time: 2:44 PM
Location: Intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road @ US 41/Tamiami Trail N.
The Respondent pleaded "not guilty" and objected to the alleged speed of his vehicle
which was indicated as "26 miles per hour." He contended ifhe turned the corner at
that speed, his SUV would have flipped over on its side. He stated the Citation
directed him to view the video at www.violationinfo.com and contended the video did
not provide footage to show his car had stopped prior to the white lines before rolling
forward into the intersection. He further stated he knew he was supposed to stop
prior to the crosswalk to view oncoming traffic.
The Special Magistrate reviewed the still photographs of the intersection.
The Respondent stated he always checks to the left, then to the right and again to the
left. He further stated it was difficult to remember the particular date since so much
time had elapsed. He questioned whether the County could produce any evidence
that his vehicle did not stop.
Lt. Minch stated the County could not dispute the Respondent's claim because their
video did not show footage prior to the Respondent's vehicle entering the area.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
NOT GUILTY of the alleged violation by the Special Magistrate.
10
October 23, 2009
45. Notice #1360900039121 - BCC vs. Robert Dou2las Sands
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi
The Respondent resides at 206 Autumn Chase Drive, Annapolis, Maryland, and
verified he is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: August 29,2009
Time: 8:57 AM
Location: Intersection of Airport-Pulling Road @ Immokalee Road
The Special Magistrate reviewed the video.
The Respondent pled "not guilty" and stated his vehicle came to a complete stop. He
admitted he stopped further into the intersection in order to obtain a better line of
sight because a large, red truck to his left blocked his view. He stated it was his
second day in the area, and he has driven at least "one-half million miles" without an
accident. He stated if there had not been a blockage, he would have stopped on the
wide white line.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
NOT GUILTY of the alleged violation by the Special Magistrate due to safety
considerations.
10. Notice #1360900048437 - BCC vs. Marc J. Battistello
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi.
The Respondent resides at 585 Clubside Drive, #103, Naples Florida, and verified he
is the registered owner of the vehicle.
Date of Violation: September 3, 2009
Time: 4:56 AM
Location: Intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road @ US 41/Tamiami Trail N.
The Respondent pleaded "not guilty." He stated he is a full-time resident who
"knows enough" to stop twice and look for ongoing traffic. He stated he was not
aware he could view the video online.
The Special Magistrate reviewed the video.
The Respondent stated his normal habit is to stop twice at intersections. He pointed
out his stops for the Special Magistrate. The first stop was just past the line but there
was no traffic at all on the road at that time. He then stopped again in the
11
October 23,2009
intersection. He said he followed the "intent if not the letter" of the law and stated the
white line is too far back from the intersection.
The Special Magistrate stated, unlike the previous case, it was not necessary for the
Respondent to enter the intersection as far as he did because nothing was blocking his
view and there were no safety considerations to view on-coming traffic.
The Respondent stated he used good judgment by stopping twice and looking both
ways at each stop before completely proceeding into the roadway.
The Special Magistrate stated the Ordinance is specific so the law may be applied
evenly to everyone. Drivers are required to stop at the white line.
Lt. Minch stated the camera flash lights up the intersection. The Respondent's car
was breaking steadily until the camera flashed at which point the front ofthe car
dived because it stopped. He further stated it appeared the Respondent stopped his
vehicle after the picture was taken.
The Special Magistrate stated while the Respondent's intent was good, the specifics
of law must be applied.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
The Special Magistrate advised the Respondent he will receive a Notice in the mail.
RECESS: 12:28 PM
RECONVENED: 12:48 PM
1. Notice #1360900008456 - BCC vs. A Touch of Class Transportation & Limo.
Inc.
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Harold Minch
The Special Magistrate ruled that the requirement for Notice had been satisfied and
the Hearing could proceed.
The Special Magistrate reviewed the video and determined the Ordinance had been
violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
12
October 23, 2009
** Lt. Minch reported:
. Agenda #17, Notice #1360900004299 - BCC vs. Timothy C. Dunford had
been WITHDRAWN by the County due to payment.
18. Notice #1360900026078 - BCC vs. Brian Georee Fabian
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Harold Minch
The Special Magistrate reviewed the video and determined the Ordinance had been
violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
** Supervisor Waldron reported:
. Agenda #15, Notice #1360900042182 - BCC vs. Patrick T. Lyons or
Marion Rose Cordisco had been WITHDRAWN by the County.
31. Notice #1360900001873 - BCC vs. Kurt P. and Kristina Marie Leneemann
The Hearing was requested by the Respondents who were not present.
The County was represented by Officer Michael Peabody
The Special Magistrate verified with Lt. Minch that he used the license plate to obtain
contact information for the Respondents.
The Special Magistrate reviewed the video and determined the Ordinance had been
violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
32. Notice #1360900026631- BCC vs. Lockhart Eneineerine. Inc.
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been provided, reviewed the
video and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
13
I
October 23, 2009
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
34. Notice #1360900001345 - BCC vs. Johnnv Cleo McCarter
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Michael Peabody
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
40. Notice #1360900008373 - BCC vs. William Robert Renaud
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Dan Salls
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
44. Notice #1360900009942 - BCC vs. Mary Lvnn Roeller
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Harold Minch
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
41. Notice #1360900049583 - BCC vs. Raul Ravmond Reves
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
14
October 23, 2009
The County was represented by Officer Joseph Amorosi.
It was noted the Respondent had been present earlier but left before the case was
heard.
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated on September 5, 2009 at 12:19 AM.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $50.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
42. Notice #1360900037091- BCC vs. Raul Ravmond Reves
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
The County was represented by Officer Chris Gonzalez
It was noted the Respondent had been present earlier but left before the case was
heard.
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated on August 28, 2009 at 8:30 PM.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrative fee of $5 0.00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
46. Notice #1360900015600 - BCC vs. Christopher Allen Sharpe
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Chris Gonzalez
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
47. Notice #1360900006567 - BCC vs. Robin Dale Shrock
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Michael Peabody
15
October 23,2009
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay a fine of $125.00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
50. Notice #1360900038537 - BCC vs. Tonv Toepfer
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
The County was represented by Officer Harold Minch
The Special Magistrate stated sufficient Notice had been given, reviewed the video
and determined the Ordinance had been violated.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the alleged violation(s) and ordered to pay afine of $125. 00 and an
administrativefee of $50. 00.
Total Amount Due: $175.00
IV. OLD BUSINESS: None
V. NEXT HEARING DATE - November 17,2009 at 9:00 AM, located at the Collier
County Government Center, Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, 3301 E. Tamiami
Trail, Naples, Florida.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by
Order of the Special Magistrate at 1 :05 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
Brenda Garretson, Special Magistrate
The Minutes were approved by the Special Magistrate on ,
as presented _, or as amended
16
I