The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 04/22/2008 GMPCOLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PETITION - CPSS- 2006 -1 ACTIVITY CENTER # 18 BCC: April 22, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve and adopt CPSS -06-01 Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) petition to the countywide Future Land Use Map for the purpose of expanding Activity Center # 18 by an additional 7.3 acres OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of a Small Scale GMPA to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), so as to expand Activity Center # 18 by adding an additional 7.3 acres located on the south side of U.S. 41 approximately one - fourth mile east of Collier Boulevard (SR -951) in Section 3, Township 51 South, and Range 26 East. CONSIDERATIONS: This petition is submitted as a "Small Scale" GMPA. As such, the petition is only heard by Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the BCC once where it is either approved or denied; the petition is not transmitted to Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for preliminary review and comment then subsequent adoption hearings by CCPC and BCC. Per Chapter 163.3187, Florida Statutes, there are limitations for this type of amendment, identified below, followed by staff comments in brackets [ ]. • parcel is < 10 acres in size [subject site is 7.3 acres] • property was not granted a land use change within prior 12 months [no land use change has been requested or granted within this time] • proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200' of property granted a change within last 12 months [no such change has taken place within 200'] • no text change to the goals, objectives and policies is involved, only a site specific land use amendment to the future land use map series [petitioner only requests a change to the Future Land Use Map] • site is not within an Area of Critical State Concern [the site is not in the ACSC] • for residential land use, density limit of 10 units or less per acre except for small scale amendments that are designated in the local comprehensive plan for urban infill, urban redevelopment, downtown revitalization, transportation concurrency exception areas, or regional activity center and urban central business district [the request is for inclusion in a Mixed Use Activity Center; residential uses are not anticipated] Staff Findings and Conclusions: Based upon review of the subject petition, including the supporting data and analysis submitted by the petitioner, staff makes the following findings and conclusions: • The site location is appropriate and the allowable uses would be generally compatible with the surrounding properties and existing uses. • The submitted data and analysis, e.g., market study, suitability and compatibility analysis, supports the subject request. • Transportation impacts can be offset by future roadway improvements pursuant to a recently approved Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) — U.S. 41 Developers' Consortium. • There would be no adverse environmental or public utility impacts resulting from this amendment. • Adoption of this amendment would support a potential future rezone request for any intensity of development consistent with the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts associated with this Petition GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development and to create focal points within the community. The addition of this site into Activity Center # 18 would be consistent with that concept. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The petition for this small scale Growth Management Plan amendment is made pursuant to the terms and authority of Florida Statutes, Section 163.3187 (1) (c). - MSS COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPCI RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC held a hearing on the subject petition on March 20, 2008, and forwarded a unanimous recommendation of approval and adoption to the BCC. This petition and the companion rezone petition (PUDZ- 2006 -AR- 10875) were discussed jointly. There were no public speakers at the CCPC hearing, and no correspondence has been received concerning this amendment. - RECONEWENDATION: Staff recommends that the BCC approve and adopt Small Scale GMPA CPSS- 06 -01. PREPARED BY: Joe Thompson, Senior Planner, Comprehensive Planning Department ITEM 9.11. �✓O � � eY �OL17�Lt� STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING: March 20, 2008 SUBJECT: PETITION CPSS- 2006 -1: Tamiami Crossings Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment [not part of 2007 cycle of GMP amendments; exempt from twice per year amendments to GMP per section 163.3187(1) (C) Florida Statutes] (companion item to petitions PUDZ- 2006 -AR- 10875, Tamiami Crossings and PUDA- 2006 -AR- 11734, Artesa Pointe). AGENT /APPLICANT: AGENT: Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Rich Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 APPLICANT: Thomas K. McGowan KRG 951 & 41, LLC 30 South Meridian Street, Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 -3565 2 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, containing approximately 7.3 acres, is located on the south side of U.S. 41 approximately one -fourth mile east of Collier Boulevard (SR -951) in Section 3, Township 51 South, and Range 26 East. ZONING MAP Yfl�� M 132 . I: 133 \" — ✓ G'I �,a ::' .a. s \WX � PUD •SUBJECT VAHCEL ) \ �p°l. c e y yl C � P ��tA�P dI�91��'I�(i ➢�1}tlR L-1 /� %] � /�� L�YY ,SY I CLO `; 1.�r7 C•5 i, C MIS T ( g l q l / G,,�_�1 _ to •C� `.f { J j� �' ie�7V lr'I I FUTURE LAND USE MAP Urban ReeiOenliel _ � SuDtlutnd ` FLU: UP % s mixed -use N[Uv1W Center �\ FBJ L mender On Creek pAlapO -Use $ubtlletH[t ^rbCn COeafel � F, ue saeb'�avlm AERIAL MAP Urban Co51e1 Fringe SubOletncf 9 4 REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to amend the Future Land Use Map's Mixed Use Activity Center # 18 by expanding the boundary to include the 7.3 acre subject site. The property is currently designated as Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map. The requested action, if approved, would re- designate the subject site's Future Land Use designation to Mixed Use Activity Center thereby making the site eligible for zoning to allow C -1 through C -5 uses. PROPOSED AMENDMENT MAP ., II T" �" i4" j• 0 � _ SUBJECTS E 1 � / - , CPSyi666•t iiaa�iasw = °-- In connection to this small -scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment, there is a companion commercial rezoning application known as the Tamiami Crossings Commercial Planning Unit Development (CPUD) rezone which proposes 235,000 square feet of retail, service and office development on 25 +/- acres property — rezone application includes the subject 7.3 acre site. This petition is submitted as a "small scale" Plan Amendment. As such, the petition is only heard by CCPC and BCC once where it is either approved or denied; the petition is also transmitted to DCA for review and comment. Per Chapter 163.3187, Florida Statutes, there are limitations for this type of amendment, identified below, followed by staff comments — in bold. ➢ property was not granted a land use change within prior 12 months (no land use change has been requested or granted within this time) ➢ proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200' of property granted a change within last 12 months (no such change has taken place within 200') ➢ no text change to the goals, objectives and policies is involved, only a site specific land use amendment to the future land use map series (petitioner only requests a future land use mixed use activity center map change) ➢ site is not within an Area of Critical State Concern (the site is not in the ACSC) ➢ for residential land use, density limit of 10 units or less per acre except for small scale amendments that are designated in the local comprehensive plan for urban infill, urban redevelopment, downtown revitalization, transportation concurrency exception areas, or regional activity center and urban central business district (the request is for inclusion in a Mixed Use Activity Center; commercial uses are anticipated; maximum allowable density would be 4 du/a). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner proposes to change the future land use designation of the subject site from Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to Mixed -Use Activity Center Subdistrict — if redesignated, the respective site will be part of a 25 acre rezone to CPUD, to permit development of commercial land uses with a maximum of 235,000 square feet. When this total commercial building area coverage is prorated for the subject 7.3 acre parcel, it results in approximately 70,000 square feet of commercial floor area uses potentially associated with this request. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS: Subject Site: The subject site is currently undeveloped. The current future land use designation is Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and the current zoning is A, Rural Agricultural. Surrounding Lands: � h T✓ i .. R `Y 6 .et+' J '3iK` fTJ� .f£i'w`ty' L �`.,S � -k 4 Urban Residential C -4, C-5 & PUD North Subdistrict & Mixed - (Falling Waters Beach Commercial & Use Activity Center Resort Residential South Henderson Creek PUD (Artesa Pointe) Commercial & Mixed -Use Subdistrict Residential East Urban Coastal Fringe A, PUD (Artesa Undeveloped & Subdistrict Pointe) &, MH Residential Mixed -Use Activity West Center Subdistrict C -2 &A Undeveloped STAFF ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Data and Analysis Requirements Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance" sets forth the minimum data and analysis requirement for comprehensive plan amendments. More specifically, Section 9J -5.005 "General Requirements" delineates criteria for plan amendments in sub - section 9J -5.005 (2) "Data and Analysis Requirements." Sub - section 9J- 5.005(2) states in part that "All goals, objectives, standards, findings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amendments and its support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis applicable to each element. To be based upon data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. The Department will review each comprehensive plan [amendment] for the purpose of determining whether the plan [amendment] is based on data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether data were collected and applied in a professionally acceptable manner." It is incumbent upon all applicants requesting comprehensive plan amendments to provide supporting data and analyses in conjunction with any relevant support documents. It is not the responsibility of Collier County staff to generate data and analysis for the applicant, although it is staff's responsibility to identify any shortcomings in the data and analyses during the sufficiency review process and to request additional information that is deemed essential in the review of the submitted request for a plan amendment. Any outstanding deficiencies with respect to data and analyses that may remain at the time of any requisite public hearing are the responsibility of the applicant. A detailed synopsis of the adequacy of the data and analysis for the subject plan amendment is set forth with specificity below. Environmental Impacts: Environmental staff has no objection to the proposed amendment. Incorporating the subject property into respective Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict will have no effect on the Policies and Objectives of the GMP's Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Additionally, there are no known historic or archaeological sites on the subject property as according to the County's Historical and Archaeological Probability Maps. Public Utilities Impacts: Public Utilities staff has no obiection to the proposed amendment and finds it consistent with the Collier County Water & Sewer District ( CCWSD) Master Plan. The site lies within the CCWSD and will receive service as available. Transportation Impacts: The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicates that there is a significant impact to US 41 east of SR /CR -951 which is currently operating at LOS F. At the current time, the State is undergoing a Project Development and Environmental Study to determine how this road will be widened, but there is currently no funding identified for right -of -way or construction at this point. However, a recently approved Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) qualifies the subject petition for - approval since the specific mitigation identified will improve the level of service and the development proposed in the companion rezone petition is being phased to match certain phases of corridor improvement. Approoriateness of Change The Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate new and existing commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated in order to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development and to create focal points within the community. If incorporated into Activity Center # 18, the subject site would be consistent with existing properties within the center from a property location perspective, i.e., the subject site has direct roadway frontage on U.S. 41 East (also lies approximately one -fourth mile east of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and U.S. 41 East). The property adjacent to the east, between the subject site and Artesa Pointe PUD's access onto U.S. 41 (Trail Ridge Road), is owned by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). This precludes further Activity Center expansion to the east. The easterly edge of the subject site aligns with the recreational tract in the Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD across U.S. 41 to the north, and west of that tract is commercial zoning. Based upon surrounding zoning, land uses and ownership patterns, as well as development standards in the Land Development Code, staff finds the uses allowed under the Mixed -Use Activity Center Subdistrict for the subject site to be generally compatible with the surrounding area. In terms of land use feasibility, this site would be an appropriate location for commercial development when compared to the possible establishment of fragmented and disorganized patterns of commercial development. The subject site is contiguous to Activity Center # 18 and is directly adjacent to existing commercial development — construction support uses — on the north side of U.S. 41 East. The subject site also abuts the Henderson Creek Mixed -Use Subdistrict which is currently zoned as Artesa Pointe PUD (comprised of a commercial and residential component, e.g., Wal -Mart Supercenter and a Habitat for Humanity community). S commercial capacity within the region. Per the 2007 Commercial Inventory, the available commercially zoned vacant land in the South Naples Planning Community amounts to 434.36 acres and is by no standard insufficient or inadequate. However, as stated, the applicant asserts that there is a severe shortage of community and regional commercial sites, as there are only three vacant commercially zoned properties exceeding 20 acres in the South Naples Planning Community. Although only 7.3 acres (not large enough to support a regional commercial site), the subject property is inexorably linked to the aforementioned companion CPUD rezone that aims to create a 25 +/- acre development comprised of 235,000 square feet of retail, service, and office uses. The fact that the applicant depended primarily on an argument relative to the severe shortage of community and regional commercial sites in the South Naples Planning Community demonstrates a flaw in their commercial inventory needs analysis. The analysis failed to recognize competition from surrounding commercially developed parcels designed to serve in neighborhood commercial capacities. Many of the goods and products provided at community and regional commercial sites can be obtained from smaller -scale commercial developments. In support of the claim for increased commercial capacity in the South Naples Planning Community, the petitioner submitted a market analysis which analyzed surrounding residential subdivision activity in 3, 5 and 10 mile trade areas. The market analysis also outlined the demographic profile of residents living within a 1, 3 and 5 radius of the Collier Boulevard and U.S. 41 East intersection. The data provided in the market analysis supports the assertion related to the argument for increased commercial capacity based upon strong residential growth in the subject area as demonstrated through 2005 and 2006. It should be noted that the market analysis does not provide an evaluation of the surrounding residential subdivision activity for any quarter within 2007. Given the recent downturn in residential activity, it is reasonable to assert that the 2007 quarterly numbers are lower than the numbers provided for 2005 and 2006 quarters. However, the level of previously existing residential activity and the number of units brought online during that period will serve the planned commercial activity associated with this proposed expansion of Activity Center # 18. FUTURE LAND UBE MAP F =; --- °o - --! _ r. -F'. Vii' O— om•.ma..� •� _ s x nv. - _ imimr..• -- o —_— � •emsm -� .. ,.... f .495` l te! . + t ` * ... §R> _ _ NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: The applicant duly noticed and held the NIM for Tamiami Crossing PUDZ -AR- 10875, Artesa Pointe PUDA -AR- 11734, and CPSS -06 -1 as companion items on September 26, 2007, 5:30 PM at Manatee Elementary School. Approximately 70 people attended, some of whom identified themselves as residents of Eagle Creek. Also present were Commissioner Fiala and Planning Commissioner Murray, the applicant and his team, and county staff. Some of the major issues and concerns discussed were: Q. Is there a big box, "Super - Target@, coming in ?" A. Kite Development's Eric Strickland, responded that a box retail /grocery is proposed and Kite is a "Target(Y" developer. Project's projected retail opening is late 2008. Q. What will the zoning allow? A. The proposed zoning is for C -4, general commercial, and a potential garden center was mentioned. Most questions focused on traffic impacts, parking lot configurations, and county Transportation Divisions' plans for area roads improvements. Mr. Strickland said, "We will seek a signal on US- 41 between our site and 1/4 mile from the Habitat for Humanity project. An alternate location is further east, subject to the FDOT." The applicant's team discussed access and interconnection points, stating there are plans for 3 access points. There are 2 interconnection points with Artesa Pointe (Wal- Mart@) proposed. Deviation proposals from the county codes discussed by petition agent Wayne Arnold included: 1) Parking to be oriented in front, and 2) Landscape buffers between retail. Verbal commitments made by the developer: • "We will come and speak to HOA's off the record." Commitments made by the developer's agent, Richard Yovanovich: • "Commit to not being on summary or consent agenda, if there are objections." It was also stated by members of the applicant's team, "There will be no tattoo parlor." The NIM officially closed at approximately 6:30 PM. Transportation Planning director, Nick Casalanguida, said he and the applicant's team were there to address development contribution agreements to improvements of the Collier Boulevard /US -41 intersection. 10 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based upon review of this petition, including the supporting data and analysis submitted by the petitioner, staff makes the following findings and conclusions: • The site location is appropriate and allowable uses would be generally compatible with the surrounding properties and uses. • The submitted data and analysis, e.g., market study, supports the amendment request. • Transportation impacts can be offset by future roadway improvements pursuant to the recently approved DCA. • There are no adverse environmental or public utility impacts resulting from this amendment. • Adoption of this amendment would support a potential future rezone request for any intensity of development consistent with the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict. EAC RECOMMENDATION: The Environmental Advisory Council did not hear this petition. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This staff report has been reviewed and approved by the Office of the County Attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward the Tamiami Crossings small scale growth management plan amendment (Petition CPSS- 2006 -1) to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for adoption. PREPARED BY: THOMPS6N, SENIOR PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DAVID WEEKS, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW D BY- RANDY COHE , AICP, DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: DATE: DATE: 3.3 -0e REVIEWED BY: MARAME M. STUDENT - STIRLING ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: O EPH K. S HMITT, ADM NISTRATOR C MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & NVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PETITION: CPSS- 2006 -1 Staff Report for the March 20, 2008 CCPC Meeting DATE: .3 - 3 G n DATES 3 OS NOTE: This petition has been advertised for the April 22, 2008 BCC meeting COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: DATE: MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN I1 ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO 89 -05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES (MAP OF ACTIVITY CENTER NUMBER 18) OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, TO SHOW AN INCREASE OF 7.318± ACRES, WHICH PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Future Land Use Map and Map Series, on January 10, 1989 and the Future Land Use Map Series of the GMP depicting site specific boundaries for Activity Centers, on May 9, 2000; and WHEREAS, the request is for an amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, which includes the Activity Center Number 18 Map, involving less than 10 acres of land; and WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, representing Eric Strickland, of KRG 951 R 41 LLC, the applicant, has submitted a request to amend the boundaries of the Activity Center Number 18 Map, as depicted on the Maps that are part of the Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Collier County GMP to expand the Activity Center by 7.318t acres; and WHEREAS, the amendment does not involve a change to the text of any part of the Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the GMP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small Scale Amendment; and met. WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES. This Ordinance shall be known as the CPSS- 2006 -1, Small Scale Amendment to the Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The boundaries of Activity Center Number 18, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Future Land Use Element, are hereby amended as depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance (Small Scale Amendment) shall not become effective until 31 days after its adoption. If challenged within 30 days after adoption, this Ordinance shall not become effective until the Department of Community Affairs or the Administration Commission, respectively, issues a final order determining the adopted Small Scale Amendment is in compliance. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2008. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Marjorie . Student - Stirling, ? Assistant County Attorney CPSS- 2006 -1 Adoption Ordinance TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN 6 d Ht J �F EQ ' P t \v C \ x \� ,FQ W N 4 �� fit' ii �•.`. i U y g _ g APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF[ DATE RECEIVED This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (239) 403 -2300; Fax: (239) 643 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239 - 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REOUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Thomas K. McGowan Company KRG 951 & 41 LLC Mailing Address 30 South Meridian Street Suite 1100 City Indianapolis State IN Zip Code 46204 -3565 Phone Number 317 -577 -5600 Fax Number 317 -577 -5605 B.I. Name of Agent* Wayne Arnold * THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION_ Company /Firm O. Grady Minor and Associates P.A. Mailing Address 3800 Via Del Rev City Bonita Springs State FL Zip Code 34134 Phone Number 239- 947 -1144 Fax Number 239- 947 -0375 Email Address wamold9gradyminor corn 1 02/2002 M A Q Name of Agent *Rich Yovanovich Esq. *THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company /Firm Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson P.A. Mailing Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 City Naples State Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239 - 435 -3535 Fax Number 239- 435 -1218 Email Address rvovanovich(a)gcjlaw corn Name of Owner(s) of Record KRG 951 & 41 LLC Mailing Address 1350 Spyglass Lane City Naples State Zip Code 34102 -7741 Name, Address and Qualifications of additional Planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1. C. Dean Smith, P.E. Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Spripgs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239 -947 -1144 Fax: 239- 947 -0375 Dsm th(d)gradvminor.com 2. Rae Ann Boylan, Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1 1000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 Phone: 239- 418 -0671 Fax: 239- 418 -0672 raeannLc boylanenv com Reed Jarvi Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 Phone: 239 - 437 -4601 Fax: 239- 437 -4636 rjarvi(dvanday com 2 02/2002 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock KRG 951 & 41. LLC Folio #00726240005 30 South Meridian Street Suite 1100 100% Indianapolis, IN 46204 -3565 C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership 02/2002 E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (2005) If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option _ terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 4 02/2002 I11. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY B. Legal Description Please see attached legal description C. Section: 3 Township: 51 South Range: 26 East D. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 00726240005 E. General Location Property is located on the south side of U.S. 41 approximately mile east of Collier Boulevard. F. Planning Community South Naples F.TAZ 346 G. Size in Acres 7.318± _ H. Zoning A L Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: ✓ Future Land Use hnmokalee Area Master Plan Transportation Coastal & Conservation Intergovernmental Coord. Sanitary Sewer Drainage Golden Gate Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Housing Recreation & Open Space Potable Water Solid Waste Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. Amend Page(s) N/A of the N/A Element As Follows: (Use Cress Ehreugks to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: N/A C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, FROM: Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict District, Subdistrict TO: Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict District, Subdistrict [If new District and/or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) E. Describe additional changes requested: 02/2002 V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to S'/: x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. X Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. X Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. X Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. X Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. X Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2. X Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) 3. X Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 97- I1.006(1)(a)Ta,F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. Y Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small 6 02/2002 Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district/subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district /subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5)F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. YES Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) X Potable Water b) _ X Sanitary Sewer c) X Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS Collier Boulevard and U.S. 41 Please refer to Exhibit V.E.1c — Traffic Impact Statement d) X e) X I) _ N/A Drainage Solid Waste Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1. 1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. X Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools, and emergency medical services. 3. X Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. D Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM) (Community Number 120067, Panel Number 615G, November 17 2005). 7 02/2002 2. N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). 3. X Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable. 4. X Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable. 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. N/A $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. X $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. X Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly. 4. X Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). 5. X Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. X I Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of l" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8%, x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 02/2002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize O. Grady Minor and Assoc., P.A. and Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson. P.A. (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. KRG 95Y& 41, LLC �5 Signed- 10)z Date: January 1 -4'� 2007 j` McGowan, Chief Operating Officer (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make th regoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knT d re of Applicant �n� Thomas K. McGowan, Chief Operating Officer Name — Typed or Printed STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF MARION Sworn to and subscribed before me this I�C day of Jgnu�tr/ ,200 7 , 1 I X71 �. AdiGth� i 11 By 1 (NoiuyPublic) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : Za zb1q CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath �^ did not take an Oath NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: as identification Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SOLE MEMBER OF KRG 951 & 41, LLC TO ACTION WITHOUT A MEETING The undersigned, being the sole member of KRG 951 & 41, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (the "Company'), hereby consents that the following actions may be, and the same hereby are, taken without the necessity of a meeting of the Company: RESOLVED, that the following persons ( "Officers ") are hereby elected to the offices of the Company shown opposite their respective names, to hold such offices until their successors are duly elected and qualified: John A. Kite: President and Chief Executive Officer Thomas K. McGowan: Executive Vice President of Development and Chief Operating Officer Daniel R. Sink: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer George McMannis, IV Senior Vice President of Finance and Capital Markets RESOLVED, that any and all acts taken, and any and all agreements or other instruments executed, on behalf of the Company by any officer of the Company prior to the execution hereof be, and they hereby are, ratified, confirmed, adopted and approved; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Consent be in lieu of a meeting of the Company, and shall be filed in the record book of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Written Consent as of the day of November, 2005. KITE REALTY GROUP, L.P. By: Kite Realty Group Trust, its general partner By: John A. Kit , eside t and CEO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL KRG 951 and 41, LLC The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that they are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Folio Number 00726240005 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for planned unit development (PUD) zoning. We hereby designate 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, P.A., legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Own(J 1 & 41, LLC By: Name: Thomas K. McGowan Its: Chief Operating Officer STATE OF INDIANA) COUNTY OF MARION) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this t � day of AL Ar 2067 by ` YI10mA.S K. M4 Ei&- J'9t✓N who is personally known to me &r4larprotilMe 4' . No ry Pubkc" _ Maki Ratn�Grn SSOgj�'' `. (Name typed, printed or stamped) (Serial Number, if any) 4v0xwt1sSicryJ eaKprele5 Jtwly 2U, "201`(' Book 3860 - Page 2805 Tract 55.1 Exhibit 'A" Opmmagng at the IntersedM W the Soutlierty Nft- -way IIre of $tam Road 90 with the Fesl right- of-,,,, fine of Stem Road 951: thence abng the SOYthedy dgl%WF y' JIM W and State Road 90, South 54 "ia'16' Eat 1500.10 Met for the PUCE OF BE WIM; Bianco mnlInue along wd SoWrerN rlghb of w y Ina South 542016' EaA 797 Met W a point on and SoWmrty rght -oFway line which Iles North 54 °21YI6' Wet 2363.33 k6 hmn 0n btnmtlian or and SoutMty dght W- y Inn wRh Ne Fast dne of 3- ecbn]. TowrishfV 51 South, Range 26 East; tte m .,�,°_.em�r�9' �-%�400 feet: NmdsNOr 54020'16" Wet ]97 feet to a point which Iles South 35 °3744" WeA 400 feet 6pm the Place W Beglnninq; then¢ North 35°3744' Eat 400.00 Ret to the PLACE OF BEOINWN6; being IN part or SeQbn 3, Township 516auth, Range 26 a.1; GA& CSUMy, Horde. x O w m m O b !i] m O x x x Page 1 of 1 WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SOLE MEMBER OF KRG 951 & 41, LLC TO ACTION WITHOUT A MEETING The undersigned, being the sole member of KRG 951 & 41, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company (the "Compan y "), hereby consents that the following actions may be, and the same hereby are, taken without the necessity of a meeting of the Company: RESOLVED, that the following persons ( "Officers ") are hereby elected to the offices of the Company shown opposite their respective names, to hold such offices until their successors are duly elected and qualified: John A. Kite: President and Chief Executive Officer Thomas K. McGowan: Executive Vice President of Development and Chief Operating Officer Daniel R. Sink: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer George McMannis, IV Senior Vice President of Finance and Capital Markets RESOLVED, that any and all acts taken, and any and all agreements or other instruments executed, on behalf of the Company by any officer of the Company prior to the execution hereof be, and they hereby are, ratified, confirmed, adopted and approved; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Consent be in lieu of a meeting of the Company, and shall be filed in the record book of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Written Consent as of the day of November, 2005. KITE REALTY GROUP, L.P. By: Kite Realty Group Trust, its general partner By: John A. Kite-, �side t and CEO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11/3 This Instrument Prepared By: George P. Langford 3357 Tamiami Trail North Naples, Florida 34103 (239) 262 -2011 FEE SIMPLE DEED 3672582 OR: 3860 PG: 2805 RECORDED to OFFICIAL RECORDS 00/01/2005 at 02:52PK DWIGHT Retn: GOULETTE COLEMAN IT AL 1001 TANIAMI TI A 1300 NAPLES FL 31103 of COLLIER CODATT, FL R. RROCI, CLERK CONS 180000.00 RIC FEE 27.00 DOC -.70 1260.00 THIS INDEN'T'URE made this all day ofJuly, 2005, by GEORGE P. LANGFORD, a single man, hereinafter called the Grantor, to KRG 951 & 41, LLC, an Indiana Limited Liability Company, whose post office address is: 30 S. Meridian Street, Suite 1100, Indianapolis, IN 46204, hereinafter called the Grantee: That the Grantor, for and in valuable considerations, receipt w aliens, remises, releases, and tr County, Florida, to wit: A 6.75% interest in This deed is being interest in the subi TOGETHER with or in any wise appertaining. WITNESSETH: *10 um of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other ged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, the Grantee, t certain land situate in Collier Exhibit "A ". remaining 93.25% thereto belonging GRANTOR covenants with Grantee Iha#: lckddi`�Iawfully seized of the property in fee simple; that Grantor have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the property; that Grantor warrant the title to the property for any acts of Grantor and will defend it against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. IN WHEREOF WITNESS, the said Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 42 day of July, 2005 by GEORGE P. LANGFORD, who is personall¢_.lwewr7 to me or who has produced as identification. / My Commission Expires: (SEAL) �. 0 o.nbPS C MAaiaak Mir comNwa, DDM EXMMS60wb 18. cvlZ t�L O 7c! w 00 o� 0 b r7 [V OD O Q1 Tract 56. i Exhibit "A" Commencing at the intersection of the Southerly right-of -way line of State Road 90 with the East right -of- way line of State Road 951; thence along the Southerly right-of-way line of said State Road 90, South 54 020'16" East 1500.10 feet for the PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said Southerly right - of -way line South 54 020'16" East 797 feet to a point on said Southerly right -of -way line which Iles North 54 °20'16" West 2363.33 feet from the Intersection of said Southerly right -of -way line with the East line of ct Seoh . 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East; thence-Sou ` " °m�� T T `% 400 feet; thenrallorth 54 020'16" West 797 feet to a point which lies South 35 039'44" West 400 feet from the Place of Beginning; thence North 35 039'44" East 400. W the PLACE OF BEGINNING, being a part of Section 3, Township 51 South, Rangelnt�, Florida. x� >t O w m rn 0 b N OD 0 >F x a[- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 6 Q e1 j32 vy .n X K W — 4 °49 gCE 3 q- u � a� o g2 3p t @A C5p55p �9 Y e �`• N I O V3 b V LLLLJJ_ _ s i WV6OIOE'9LOOZ/OEA'dVN3Sf1ONV DNIISI( ' bm q'( MdL9631Ii1 )3SOONVI3lJnin- \VdWO\(ind ONISSOHDIWVIWVI \SOMOONINNVId road\a ■ - -�@ I !e � 22 U »y; ■ - -�@ I ■ w � ( §} \ ( \ § K Nil \ � ! , !| �` � /�° yam- � � �� _ • - � � »y; ■ w � ( §} \ ( \ § K Nil \ � ! , !| �` � /�° yam- � � �� _ • - � THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK W h 00h Ll 2 2 v N V h Z N i2 VO��rn4y¢i 3O t� "W 5 L') v y >. Lz L o y p ¢ 0 0 0 J v Lw 3 ~ J 2 a tZi w fti p��W��`j¢2mj V W �p6n'��4r�OV� LQ 2`D2 ti Ly 3v~i��o� pDN¢¢�¢ C v¢ O W WG7W OhL 0• N• g rb ¢ G0�42i �n V�h��Th �+1p� W Q tiho p �a(81) �g a G �n a 2� W 2 <n � 2 v- (n Jgff 9Z 99AM 7JJAOS !9 JIHS)UOl $ MOMA'S ,JO YVfl a 0 0 2 3 L I O W O W lVu L - O O h O O � Ll i � U C15 W Q< �¢ L'4¢ 6R / day �pO '9� �i a� N g 1 pp 0. U 0 4 gO O v Cy ry 0 M z R 0 0 N O Mh r a_ rir< a � e 4 0 W h ti O h W LW 34y L�'2 c, Wow 0 2 W ? W " O y c�5j��°WOy zi �2l W 3S4 °In�°O �yN. W ° 40 1 2��`D 2a�3Nti�oH �� yU o W W �q0 h W � 3� �° 3 �°b Inti WW to O �i lnm2�W 21n �n2 v�"i �n — JSV9 9. 99NW YIJOOS 19 dlHSJ W '8 NOLLOSS JO SNJ7 '9 8 / olb S o 90 :xis oo� e m / o' •oo, yb /6 0d sxn err -da -trim ur9 i2Ai= To Qyow &d rls 0 o � Y � N t 2 � C 8 �V 2 ,V m W d A °w 0.' R qQ 4 0 9h CR U 0 Vn U 4 h ry m O' � m r Pq 2 w V N ,I,R Q v< 4 A a M o m Q O 4 V1 ! V y o o y i $ W a� m� b2 oa �I 0 Ci 00 44 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK F \PROJ - PLANNING DWGS\TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD\GMPA \LAND USE (KITE951PLN)Awg, COVER, 1/30/20078:44:42 AM F'. \PROD - PLANNING OWGS \TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD \GMPA \LAND USE (KITE951PLN) dwg, LOC MAP, lW/2001 9.44:44 AM 1 }} u I�K��t � ! f .+}^t y!y_... f +d:.. ".."`',°�, s,. *pR' 1�y! .� 'v • - ' i ✓y `* _ yr.:. .Itrv� s1 ''.. �M1' �.4f ,c�6S� FlThF,.J '' . / ^ r r, r b ZA rot Al tcwi ' L.+ �...,, � t �J e¢elu v eureY �r Ell �� >•w -1AAq AIf�A ^� ry 4 v t rook .• ry - SIP- •a`` as,,1+""r'!i"4. �; a`!�. :a t S, i; 7• w ygr•tiV I�h .i 1 A ."yLa,'u`'�aff�.l y:;�^ t/ i /•� Ali itf ... 2. V: r M' r 'Ft 3. �j fl 7 `iitM t,14 1 fc a > 1 v I ry > ry r i 1 n 7 ° �' .4s'' 'LyyY /7�i` r Y ^✓tv tt� �jfp 1 ✓ - r r ti y r S �� •y i Yi +4r j(rd n't S.iT Wyr:' o rl i+ .t y . fi t r•�it u ^r } yly, o s t A. r � F Sr�•� :.r f :+ •d i�t` .� r �'i r ra +j. A x 1 j 4 I r 1 r ,4 t Jrir t 1 q r. r ✓fir r A'� F:\PRCU - PLANNING OWGS \TAMIAMI CROSSING PUO \GMPA \LANG USE (KITE951 PLN).d.g, PUBLIC FACILITIES, 1/30/20078:45:05 AM z 0 xoz ox O a A m9 Vt C] O � JV CAN � I _moa m �nlz,yo UIN�N� 0 UNI a .F 0 z z m O � v C F C� A Ln C Ln 3 Q n � a �Cc Q C � m m r A p i f7 rCp DEC pAZ rf'1{ ~r m A DCti DNS A � z Z n x m n x K o z mzM m ��m n z r v m r D Z /v 1 � (1% S R 951 iI 3a Y� I� -7— ro R) n V` W b D 0 D d � +• D Iona rOm+14 o -*■ ''TT D:y O OOf D° p— V N yX Z'im-: °m G m z ;o � r� o z '' �'' ° z D 0 m D z n � o ® +� � C C Z f] Dp �z H> cc Z o c Co ~ D -7-I I n Dm O AD OD °r m ll Z� K Z O !' z �m N <yi >- " 3 y N 9 zb� R ?� ax m z m n° N z i vim, �o N ® W y C c z d z n ° ow \ d N W D fl� O Z:::EITI CD >>X zM 'Uz v� zn °n Co o COUNTY BAP C.R. 951 +• D Iona rOm+14 -*■ ''TT D:y O OOf D° p— V N yX Z'im-: °m G m Z f] Dp �z H> I O y O AD OD °r m ll Z� K Z O !' z �m N <yi >- " 3 y N 9 zb� Z ?� ax m z m n° N z i vim, z N c z z n ° � THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES November 28, 2005 ' Alicia Lewis BBC, Inc. 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, FL 33912 Fax: 239-418-0672 Dear Ms. Lewis: In response to your inquiry of November 21, 2005, the Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources in the following parcels: TS IS, R26E, Section 3 In interpreting the results of our search, please remember the following points: Areas which have not been completely surveyed, such as yours, may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, unrecorded historically important structures, or both. As you may know, state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some projects. Record searches by the staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute such a review of cultural resources. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance Review Section of the Bureau of Historic Preservation at 850- 245 -6333 or at this address. Sincerely, Michelle Caldwell Cremer Data Analyst, Florida Master Site File Division of Historical Resources R. A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 Phone: 850 -245 -6440 State SunCom: 205 -6440 Fax line: 850 -245 -6439 Email: fmsftle@dos.state fl,us Web: http .-//www_dos.statefLus/dhr/mrfi 500 S, Rroaough Street • Tallahassee, FL32399-0250 a http: /AYWW,Gheritage.com O Dirtctor s Office t3 Archaeological Re3earch a Historic Preservation b Hielorkel Museums (650) 7 S-M • FAX 245 -6155 (850) 245-6444 - FAX 243-6436 (650) U5.6333 • PAX: 2r3. 6437 (650) 245-6400 • FAX 2456433 Cl Palm Beach Regional Office ❑ at. Aago4one Regional Office O Tampa Regional Office (561) 279-1475 • FAX 279 -1476 (904) 6253045 • FAX: 6255044 (813) 2723843 • PAX: 277: 2340 TOTAL P.03 TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD Environmental Impact Statement Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida ConsultantsNfic. Wetland & Wildlife Su"eyr,/ 'onmental Permitting, Impact ssessments 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4, Fort Myers, Florida, 33912 Phone: (239)418- 0671Fax:(239)418 -0672 July 18, 2006 Submittal Requirements for All Applications A. Environmental impact statements 1. Purpose. a. The purpose of this section is to provide a method to objectively evaluate the impact of a proposed development, site alteration, or project upon the resources and environmental quality of the project area and the community and to insure that planning and zoning decisions are made with a complete understanding of the impact of such decisions upon the environment, to encourage projects and developments that will: i. Protect, conserve and enhance, but not degrade, the environmental quality and resources of the particular project or development site, the general area and the greater community. ii. Minimize the future reduction in property values likely to result, or be caused by improperly designed and executed projects and developments. iii. Reduce the necessity for expenditure of public funds in the future for rehabilitating the environmental quality of areas of environmental sensitivity. b. Further, it is the purpose of this section to attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation of environmental advantages and risk to public health, safety, welfare and other undesirable consequences. c It is also the purpose of this section to optimize a balance between population and resource use to permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of resources and amenities among all citizens and residents of and visitors to Collier County during the present and future generations. 2. Applicability; environmental impact statement (EIS) required. Without first obtaining approval of an EIS, or exemption pursuant to section 10.02.02 A.7., as required by this Code it shall be unlawful and no building permit, conditional use, zoning change, subdivision or condominium plat or unplatted subdivision approval or other county permit or approval of or for development or site alteration shall be issued to cause the development of or site alteration of. a. Any site with a ST or ACSC -ST overlay. b. All sites seaward of the coastal management boundary that are 2.5 or more acres. c. All sites landward of the coastal management boundary that are ten or more acres. d. Sites where a prior EIS was prepared and approved for the same area of land and where the following exist: i. Greater impacts to preserve areas or changes in location to preserve areas are proposed; ii Greater impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or listed species habitats are proposed; iii. New listed species have been identified on site; or iv. A previous EIS is more than 5 years old. e. Any other development or site alteration which in the opinion of the County Manager or his designee, would have substantial impact upon environmental quality and which is not specifically exempted in this Code. In determining whether such a project would have substantial environmental impact the County Manager or his designee shall base his decision on the terms and conditions described in this Code and on the project's consistency with the growth management plan. f When required by section 3.04.01 of this Code, plant and animal species surveys shall be conducted regardless of whether an EIS or resubmitted EIS is required by this section. _ 3. Submission and review of EIS. A completed EIS, in written and digital format, shall be submitted to County Manager or his designee for approval, denial or approval with modifications. No development or site alteration will be started without this approval and permits required by law. Failure to provide full and complete information shall be grounds for denial of the application. The author(s) of the EIS shall provide evidence, by academic credentials or experience, of his/her expertise in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences. Experience shall reflect at least three years, two years of which shall be in the State of Florida, of ecological or biological professional experience if substituting for academic credentials. 4. Information required for application. a. Applicant information. i. Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his /her education and job related environmental experience. Rae Ann Boylan, B.S., M.S., Biology, Environmental Sciences, 21 years experience; RaeAnnOBoylanEnv com; (239) 418 -0671 Kimberly Schlachta, B.S., Environmental Sciences, 8 years experience; KimSjc RoylanEnv com; (239) 418 -0671 ii. Owner(s) /agent(s) name, address, phone number & e -mail address. Owners. KRG 951 & 41, LLC 30 South Meridian Street Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 -3565 Folio Numbers: 00726240005 00726080003 00726160004 00726120002 00726320006 Craig R. Woodward, TR PO Box 1 Marco Island, FL 34146 -0001 Folio Numbers. 00 72 628000 7 00725841007 South Collier one, Inc. 661 South Collier Boulevard Marco Island, FL 34145 -5605 Folio Numbers: 00726721809 00726724204 00726724301 Agents. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 293- 947 -1144 Fax: 239-947-0375 warnold ,gradpminor.com Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 239- 435 -3535 Fax 239- 435 -1218 rpovanovich(7acilaw com b. Mapping and support graphics. i. General location map. See attached map titled Location Map. ii. Native habitats and their boundaries identified on an aerial photograph of the site extending at least 200 feet outside the parcel boundary. This does not mean the applicant is required to go on to adjoining properties. Habitat identification consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) shall be depicted on an aerial photograph having a scale of one inch equal to at least 200 feet when available from the County. Other scale aerials may be used where appropriate for the size of the project, provided the photograph and overlays are legible at the scale provided. A legend for each of the FLUCFCS categories found on -site shall be included on the aerial. See attached map titles FLUCCS Map of Site and Area Extending 200 Feet Beyond. iii. Topographic map, and existing drainage patterns if applicable. Where possible, elevations within each of FLUCFCS categories shall be provided. See attached map titled Topographic Map overlain on the FL UCCS Map. iv. Soils map at scale consistent with that used for the Florida Department of Transportation Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System determinations. See attached map titled NRCS Soil Survey Map. V. Proposed drainage plan indicating basic flow patterns, outfall and off -site drainage. See Concept Drainage plans provided by Engineer. vi. Development plan including phasing program, service area of existing and proposed public facilities, and existing and proposed transportation network in the impact area. See attached Engineering PUD master plans. vii. Site plan showing preserves on -site, and how they align with preserves on adjoining and neighboring properties. Include on the plan locations of proposed and existing development, roads, and areas for stormwater retention, as shown on approved master plans for these sites, as well as public owned conservation lands, conservation acquisition areas, major flowways and potential wildlife corridors. The on -site preserve location was determined based on the offsite preserve to the south. There is an existing water management berm between the properties. The preserve was located to be as contiguous as feasible to the offsite preserve. The remaining site boundaries abut major roads. No other conservation areas, wildlife corridors, or jlowways are located within or adjacent to this site. See attached PUD Master Plan and Indigenous Preserve Map. viii. For properties in the RLSA or RFMU districts, a site plan showing the location of the site, and land use designations and overlays as identified in the Growth Management Plan. Not applicable, the project is not within those districts. C. Project description and GMP consistency determination. L Provide an overall description of the project with respect to environmental and water management issues. The site is located in an urban portion of development surrounded by major roads and development. The project site contains 13.83 acres of wetlands, and 10.75 acres of uplands. There are three wetlands onsite, wetland 1 (6.54 acres) near the northwestern corner of the property. It consists ofa Pine Cypress Cabbage Palm area and also includes a hydric Power line easement that is cleared and maintained, but also contains hydric vegetation. Wetland 2 (7.13 acres) is located in the center portion of the site and also contains a Pine - Cypress Cabbage Palm mix wetland. Another portion in this wetland contains Hydric Pine Flatwoods with herbaceous groundcover. The remainder of the site is comprised ofpine flatwoods, Brazilian pepper, and open lands which have the appearance of an old crop field. The furrows are still evident. The proposed site plan will impact the following wetland habitats, Pine - Cypress- Cabbage Palm, Hydric Pine Flatwoods, and the Hydric Utility Easement. Offsite mitigation will be provided for impacts to wetlands, to be permitted by the SFWMD. The proposed onsite preservation and enhancement on -site includes 1.72 acres ofPine- Cypress- Cabbage Palm wetland habitat and 1.65 acres ofPine Flatwoods upland habitat. South Florida Water Management permitting will also require that no adverse secondary or cumulative impacts are anticipated as a result of this development and no adverse water quality or discharge impacts are anticipated. All impacts to the onsite wetlands, habitat function, and impacts within the watershed will be mitigated for in order to acquire the proper approvals. ii. Explain how the project is consistent with each of the Objectives and Policies in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, where applicable. The project site includes native wetlands and native upland habitat. The projects indigenous preserve area of 3.37 acres will contain portions of an onsite wetland, indigenous lands, and uplands, while remaining contiguous to off -site preserves. The onsite preservation and enhancement on -site includes 1.72 acres of Pine - Cypress- Cabbage Palm wetland habitat and 1.65 acres of Pine Flatwoods upland habitat. This project is consistent with Policy 6.1.1 whereas the standards and criteria have been met to preserve native vegetation on -site, by providing 15% indigenous vegetation for a commercial development. The total site preservation exceeds that required by the PUD. The site will preserve 15% of the onsite indigenous areas. In accordance with Policy 6 LL (2), preserved native vegetation will include canopy, under -story, and groundcover. The preserve areas have been designed to accommodate the indigenous communities, maintain a single contiguous preserve, and have been located adjacent to an offsite preserve. This project is consistent with Policy 6.1.1. (9) Where as the preserve areas have been interconnected to an adjoining off-site preservation area to the south. No wildlife corridors are present in this area. Since these issues are the only issues that are highlighted in the objectives, the project is consistent with the Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. d. Native vegetation preservation i. Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS). Provide a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on -site by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, midstory and ground cover) and vegetation dominance (dominant, common and occasional). 260 Other Open Lands (1.51 +1 - acres) This upland community has a nearly absent canopy with scattered live oak, slash pine, java plum, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. The mid - canopy and shrubs that were present include wax myrtle and Brazilian pepper. Other vegetation found in the groundcover includes grape vine, dog fennel, button weed, smilax, nut sedge, finger grass, broom sedge, chocolate weed, black root, and poison ivy. This area has furrows and swales reminiscent of an abandoned agriculture row crop field. However, current agricultural usage could not be determined. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C-Common, O- Occasional (C- Canopy, M- Mfdatory, G- Ground cover) Slash Pine C O Live Oak C O Java Plum C O Brazilian Pepper C O Cabbage Palm C O Wax Myrtle M Cabbage Palm Brazilian Pepper M Brazilian Pepper Grape Vine G Live Oak Dog Fennel G Myrsine False Button Weed G Beauty Berry Smilax G Downy Rose Myrtle Finger Grass G Melaleuca Broom Sedge G Saw Palmetto Nut Sedge G Wax Myrtle Chocolate Weed G Ear leafAcacia B1ackRoot G Black Root Poison Ivy G Finger Grass 411 Pine Flatwoods (8.83 +1 - acres) This upland forested community has a canopy dominated by Florida slash pine with scattered cabbage palm. The sub - canopy in some areas consisted ofscattered Brazilian pepper, live oak, mrsine, beauty berry, downy rose myrtle, and scattered melaleuca. Saw palmetto dominated most of the under story in these areas. Other vegetation noted includes sumac, smilax, poison ivy, love vine, grape vine, black root, finger grass, wax myrtle, and ear leaf acacia. Some disturbed spoil piles were noted within this mapping area near U S. 41. VEGETATIONTYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C- Conuaon, O- Occasional) (C- Canopy, M- Midstory, G- Ground cover ) Slash Pine C D Cabbage Palm C O Brazilian Pepper )W O Live Oak M C Myrsine M C Beauty Berry M C Downy Rose Myrtle M C Melaleuca M O Saw Palmetto Al D Wax Myrtle M Ear leafAcacia M Black Root G Finger Grass G Sumac G -G Smilax - Poison Ivy G 422 Brazilian Pepper (0.41 + 1- acres) This upland forested community has a canopy dominated by Slash Pine and Brazilian Pepper. Brazilian pepper also dominates the mid -story in this area. The highly disturbed area is located in the northwest corner of the property and is adjacent to commercial lands. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C-Commmy O- Occasional (C-Canopy, M- Midstory, G- Ground cover ) Slash Pine C D Brazilian Pepper C D Brazilian Pepper M D 624 Pine- Cypress - Cabbage Palm (12.18+1- acres) This community has a canopy comprised of scattered cypress, cabbage palm, laurel oak, red maple, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and Florida slash pine. The sub - canopy is comprised ofsaltbush, scattered buttonbush, melaleuca, wild coffee, myrsine, cypress, Brazilian pepper and wax myrtle. The under story was dominated by swamp fern in most areas with other vegetation including blue maidencane, pluchea rosea, dog fennel, St. John 's Wort, hydrocotyle, tickseed, spartina, yellow -eyed grass, saw grass, with some scatted areas ofgrapevine or poison ivy. This community was the most common found throughout the site. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C-Common, O- occasional (C- Canopy, M- Midmory, G- Ground cover Cypress C D Cabbage Palm C D Laurel Oak C C Red Maple C C Brazilian Pepper C C Melaleuca C C Slash Pine C D Salt bush M Button Bush M O Melaleuca M Wild Coffee M Myrsine M Cypress M Brazilian Pepper M Wax Myrtle M Swamp Fern I G D 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods (1.47 + /- acres) This wetland community has a sparse canopy comprised ofscattered Slash pine. Other canopy trees noted include cypress, dahoon holly, and cabbage palm. The sub - canopy species noted included scattered buttonbush, saltbush and wax myrtle. Ground cover was dominated by grasses and herbaceous vegetation. These hydric species included hat pins, St. John's Wort, panic grass, beak rush, spartina, and blue maidencane. Algal matting was present in these areas. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D -Domd anl, C- Common, O- Occasional) (C- Canopy, M- Midstory, G- Ground cover) Slash Pine C C/O Cabbage Palm C O Cypress C O Dahoon Holly C O Button Bush M O Wax Myrtle M Saltbush M Various Grass G D Hat Pins G St. John's Wort G Panic Grass G Beak Rush C, Spartina G Blue Maidencane G 830 Utility Easement (Hydric) (0.18 + /- acres) This herbaceous wetland community was dominated by blue maidencane in most areas with other vegetation including St. John's Wort, tickseed, smilax, saw grass, dog fennel, yellow eyed grass, beak rush, hatpins, and forked panic grass. VEGETATIONTYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C -Conm on, 0-occasional) (C- Canopy, M- Midstory, G- Ground cover) Blue Maidencane G D St. John's Wort G Tickseed G Smilax G Saw Grass G Dog Fennel G Yellow Eyed Grass G Beak Rush G 10 Hat Pins G Forked Panic Grass G FLUCCS Code Communi ty Wetland Acreage OSW acreage Non - wetland 260 Other Open Lands Pine Flatwoods 8.83 ac. 1.51 411 Pine Flatwoods 624 Pine - Cypress- Cabbage Palm 8.83 422 Brazilian Pepper -- -- 0.41 624 Pine -C ypress-Cabbaee Palm . Totals 625 H drie Pine Flatwoods 1.47 3.37 ac. 830H H drie Utility Easement 0.18 __ Total: 13.83 -- 10.75 Total Site Acreage: 24.58 ii. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land Development Code. Provide an exhibit illustrating such. Include calculations identifying the acreage for preservation and impact, per FLUCFCS category. See attached Indigenous Communities — Impact /Preserve map. The property contains approximately 22.48 acres of native indigenous habitat. Goal 6 of the Growth Management Plan, requires 15% of the indigenous habitat be preserved in order to meet Collier County indigenous requirements. As a result, the project is required to preserve 3.37 acres of indigenous habitat. The project proposes to preserve 3.37 acres, which meets the required amount. FLUCCS Community Upland Acreage Wetland Acreage Impact Acreage Preserve Acreage 411 Pine Flatwoods 8.83 ac. -- 7.06 ac. 1.65 ac. 624 Pine - Cypress- Cabbage Palm 12.18 ac. 10.46 ac. 1.72 ac. 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods 1.47 ac. 1.47 ac, Totals 7.95 ac. 13.65 ac. 18.99 ac. 3.37 ac. iii. For sites already cleared and in agricultural use, provide documentation that the parcel (s) are in compliance with the 25- year rezone limitation in Policy 6.1.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan and Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land Development Code. For sites cleared prior to January 2003, provide documentation that the parcel (s) are in compliance with the 10 -year rezone limitation previously identified in the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code. N/A iv. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site during previous development order approvals? If so, identify the location and acreage of these preserves, and provide an explanation if they are different from what is proposed. No previous development approvals have been issued for the property to our knowledge. v. For properties with Special Treatment "ST" overlays, show the ST overlay on the development plan and provided an explanation as to why these areas are being impacted or preserved. Not applicable. e. Wetlands. i. Define the number of acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands (pursuant to Policy 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan) according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS). Include a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on -site by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, midstory and ground cover) and vegetation dominance (dominant, common and occasional). Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the South Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, prior to submission to the County. 12 Three wetlands were identified on the property. Wetland 1 contains two FLUCCS communities 624 (6.36 ac.) and FLUCCS 830H (0.18 ac.). Wetland I totals 654 acres. It consists of a Pine Cypress Cabbage Palm area and also includes a Hydric Power line easement that is cleared and maintained, but also contains hydric vegetation. Wetland 2 (7.13 acres) is located in the center portion of the site and also contains a Pine- Cypress Cabbage Palm mix wetland. Another portion in this wetland contains Hydric Pine Flatwoods with herbaceous groundcover. The remainder of the site is comprised ofpine fatwoods, Brazilian pepper, and open lands which have the appearance of an old crop field. The furrows are still evident. 624 Pine - Cypress- Cabbage Palm (12.18 + 1- acres) This community has a canopy comprised of scattered cypress, cabbage palm, laurel oak, red maple, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and Florida slash pine. The sub - canopy is comprised ofsaltbush, scattered buttonbush, melaleuca, wild coffee, myrsine, cypress, Brazilian pepper and wax myrtle. The under story was dominated by swamp fern in most areas with other vegetation including blue maidencane, pluchea rosea, dogfennel, St. John 's Wort, hydrocotyle, tickseed, spartina, yellow -eyed grass, saw grass, with some scatted areas ofgrapevine or poison ivy. This community was the most common found throughout the site. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C-Common, a- occasional (C-Canopy, M- Midstom G- Groundcover Cypress C D Cabbage Palm C D Laurel Oak C C Red Maple C C Brazilian Pepper C C Melaleuca C C Slash Pine C D Salt bush M Button Bush M O Melaleuca M Wild Coffee M Myrsine M Cypress M Brazilian Pepper M Wax Myrtle M Swamp Fern G D 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods (1.47 + /- acres) 13 This wetland community has a sparse canopy comprised of scattered Slash pine. Other canopy trees noted include cypress, dahoon holly, and cabbage palm. The sub - canopy species noted included scattered buttonbush, saltbush and wax myrtle. Ground cover was dominated by grasses and herbaceous vegetation. These hydric species included hat pins, St. John's Wort, panic grass, beak rush, spartina, and blue maidencane. Algal matting was present in these areas. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C- Common, O- Occasional (C- Canopy, M- Midstory, G- Ground cover ) Slash Pine C C/O Cabbage Palm C O Cypress C O Dahoon Holly C O Button Bush M O Wax Myrtle M Saltbush M Various Grass G D Hat Pins Cr St. John's Wort G Panic Grass G Beak Rush G Spartina G Blue Maidencane G 830 Utility Easement ( Hydric) (0.18 + /- acres) This herbaceous wetland community was dominated by blue maidencane in most areas with other vegetation including St. John's Wort, tickseed, smilax, saw grass, dog fennel, yellow eyed grass, beak rush, hat pins, and forked panic grass. VEGETATION TYPE COMPOSITION DOMINANCE (D- Dominant, C- Commmy O- Occasional) (C- Canopy, M- Midstory, G- Ground cover) Blue Maidencane G D St. John's Wort G Tickseed G Smilax G Saw Grass G Dog Fennel G Yellow Eyed Grass G Beak Rush G Hat Pins G Forked Panic Grass G 14 ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other biological indicators. Indicate how the project design improves /affects predevelopment hydroperiods. Provide a narrative addressing the anticipated control elevation(s) for the site. Seasonal high water elevations were determined using existing permitting for adjacent sites. The control elevation will be at an elevation that will, at a minimum, maintain the hydrology of the preserved wetland as permitted through the SFWMD. There will be no hydrological adverse affects to the wetland preserve or uplands. iii. Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of proposed impacts on the functions of these wetlands. Provide an exhibit showing the location of wetlands to be impacted and those to be preserved on -site. Describe how impacts to wetlands have been minimized. See attached Wetland Impacts Map and Wetland Preserve Map The total percentage of wetland impacts on -site is 56 percent or 13.83 acres. Approximately 12. 11 acres of wetlands or 87% will be impacts as a result of this development. Approximately 1. 72 acres of wetlands will be preserved on -site. The wetlands onsite have been impacted by historic drainage alterations in the basin as well as the past farming activity in the area. The historic drainage alterations include US 41 located north of the site and CR 951 located to the west of the site. All of these adjacent activities have altered the historic sheet flow patterns. The main impact to the wetland on site is the drainage alterations that have resulted from historic impacts in the basin. Under the do nothing option, this is an existing impact, which is only going to continue to degrade the wetland on the site, with or without the construction of the project. The plan has been minimized to the maximum extent possible while still allowing for a feasible project. The original plan included impacts to all of the wetlands on site as well as most of the uplands with only the preservation of the open lands which are not 15 indigenous communities in the south east corner. The original plan has been modified several times to minimize the wetland impacts. The original plan included only a two acre preserve, and gradually through site planning, the preserve area grew to almost three acres. The final site plan proposed preserves 3.37 acres which is almost 150% of what was originally proposed as preserve. iv. Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland impacts pursuant to the Policies and Objectives in Goal 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment, based on the South Florida Water Management District's Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method, that has been accepted by either the South Florida Water Management District or the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. For sites outside the RFMU district, and where higher quality wetlands are being retained on -site, provide justification based on the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method. This site is not located in the RFMU district. All Environmental issues including wetland impacts with South Florida Water management will be addressed. Mitigation for wetland impacts will be provided for through onsite and offsite mitigation per approval of the SFWMD and calculated using the UMAM. L Surface and ground water management. L Provide an overall description of the proposed water management system explaining how it works, the basis of design, historical drainage flows, off -site flows coming in to the system and how they will be incorporated in the system or passed around the system, positive outfall availability, Wet Season Water Table and Dry Season Water Table, and how they were determined, and any other pertinent information pertaining to the control of storm and ground water. The water management system will consist of a series of inlets interconnected with drainage pipes and wet detention basins. The greater of either the first inch of runofffrom the site or 2.5" times the percentage of imperviousness will be detained. Discharge through a water control structure will be to the drainage system along the U.S. 41 Road R/W via a spreader Swale system along the property line. Discharge will be limited to the rate permitted by Collier County Ord. 90 -10. 16 Presently there are no known on -site storm flows that affect this site. Wet season water table elevations were determined by existing county soil surveys and established by adjacent water management permitting. ii. Provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre- development conditions. This analysis is required for projects impacting five (5) or more acres of wetlands. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies. The project's water management system is designed to maximize water quality enhancement, thereby meeting or exceeding the requirements of SFWMD Basis of Review Sections 4.2.4 and 5.9.1(b). The project will use wet detention to attenuate storm flows discharging form the site and to protect the native preserve and wetlands. In addition, the project will use pollution prevention measures (both during and after construction) along with design features that will improve travel time to discharge locations and allow for additional "scrubbing" of the storm water prior to discharge. PRE- CONSTR UCTION AND DURING CONSTRUCTION Structural and Non - Structural Controls (Basis of Review 4.2.4.1 (a) -(fl) 1. Follow practices outlined in Pollution Prevention Plan. 2. Install perimeter berm(s) or silt fences with straw bale barrier(s) adjacent to wetland areas. 3. Continue clearing and grading. 4. Construction of storm water management lakes 5. Stockpile excavated soil. 6 Stabilize denuded areas and stockpiles within 21 days of last construction activity in that area. 7 Monitor rain events and check condition of erosion control measures after each significant event. Other Controls 1. Proper handling of hazardous or potentially hazardous materials. 2. Proper disposal of all trash and other waste products. 3. Spill prevention and notification 4 Contractor training and responsibility 17 POST - CONSTRUCTION Non - Structural Controls (Basis of Review 5.9.1(b)) This project will use Best Management Practices (BMP's) intended to improve the quality of storm water runoff by reducing the generation and accumulation of potential storm water runoff contaminants at or near the respective sources for each constituent. 1. Nutrient and Pesticide Management: The owner must commit themselves to the practice of responsible and careful landscape design and maintenance to prevent contamination of surface waters. 2. Street Sweeping: This practice involves sweeping and vacuuming the primary streets and parking areas to remove dry weather accumulation of pollutants, especially particulate matter, before wash - off of these pollutants can occur during a storm event. This practice reduces the potential for pollution impacts on receiving water bodies by removing particulate matter and associated chemical constituents. 3. Solid Waste Management: In general, solid waste management involves issues related to the - management and handling of urban refuse, litter and leaves that will minimize the impact of these constituents as water pollutants. 4. Water Management System Maintenance: Inspection of all components of the system on a regular basis. Cleaning of system as necessary to keep system to operate as designed. The water management system will be designed to meet or exceed the minimum design criteria as outlined in the Basis of Review. In addition, pre- construction and long term monitoring and maintenance of the system combined with proper fertilizer and pesticide use will improve water quality in the storm water discharges beyond minimum requirements. iii. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM -ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM -STs. The project is not within a WRM-ST overlay zone. g. Listed species. i. Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a -- minimum, listed species known to inhabit biological E communities similar to those existing on -site, and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State actual survey times and dates, and provide a map showing the location(s) of species of special status identified on -site. A protective species was conducted on the property on September 30, 2005 and October 27, 2005. The survey was conducted on September 30 between the hours of 10: 00am and 4:06pm and on October 27 from 11: 00am to 1:06pm. No protected species or signs thereof were identified during the inspection. See attached protected species survey. ii. Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on the site or that have been directly observed on the site. No protected species or signs thereof were identified on the project site. The following is a table showing which species have the potential to inhabit each FLUCCS community. FL UCCS - Potential Listed Species % Coverage Present Absent Density Visibility t 260 None 100 20 411 Beauti ul Pawpaw 100 X 20 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel 100 X 20 Eastern Indigo Snake 100 X 20 Fakahatchee Burmannia 100 X 20 Florida Black Bear 100 X 20 Florida Coontie 100 X 20 Florida Panther 100 X 20 GoDherFrop, 100 X 20 Gopher Tortoise 100 X 20 Red - Cockaded Woodpecker 100 X 20 Satin lea 100 X 20 Southeastern American Kestrel 100 X 20 Twisted Air Plant 100 X 20 422 NONE 75 20 624 American Alligator 90 X 20 Ever lades Mink 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 Go her Fro 90 X 20 Little Blue Heron 90 X 20 Snoi4y Egret 90 X 20 19 iii. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status. A plant and animal survey was conducted according to FGFWFC guidelines. Overlapping belt transects, approximately 6 to 10 feet apart were walked, depending on the density of the vegetation. In addition, periodic stop -look- listens techniques were utilized to observe potential listed species. No protected species or signs thereof were identified during the species survey. See the attached protected species survey results. Mitigation will be provided for wetland impacts onsite. The offsite mitigation will provide for preservation of habitat in a location where those species are located in perpetuity. The preservation of onsite habitat including both wetland and upland communities will provide an ecologically diverse community which will provide forage and cover for other species. iv. Provide habitat management plans for each of the listed species known to occur on the property. For sites with bald eagle nests and /or nest protection zones, bald eagle management plans are required, copies of which shall be included as exhibits attached to the PUD documents, where applicable. Not applicable, no protected species or signs thereof were observed onsite during the protected species survey. v. Where applicable, include correspondence received from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), with regards to the project. Explain how the concerns of these agencies have been met. 20 Tricolored Heron 90 X 20 Wood Stork 90 X 20 625 American Alligator 90 X 10 Ever lades Mink 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 Go her Frog 90 X 20 Little Blue Heron 90 X 20 Snowy Egret 90 X 20 Tricolored Heron 90 X 20 Wood Stork 90 X 20 830 NONE 20 iii. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status. A plant and animal survey was conducted according to FGFWFC guidelines. Overlapping belt transects, approximately 6 to 10 feet apart were walked, depending on the density of the vegetation. In addition, periodic stop -look- listens techniques were utilized to observe potential listed species. No protected species or signs thereof were identified during the species survey. See the attached protected species survey results. Mitigation will be provided for wetland impacts onsite. The offsite mitigation will provide for preservation of habitat in a location where those species are located in perpetuity. The preservation of onsite habitat including both wetland and upland communities will provide an ecologically diverse community which will provide forage and cover for other species. iv. Provide habitat management plans for each of the listed species known to occur on the property. For sites with bald eagle nests and /or nest protection zones, bald eagle management plans are required, copies of which shall be included as exhibits attached to the PUD documents, where applicable. Not applicable, no protected species or signs thereof were observed onsite during the protected species survey. v. Where applicable, include correspondence received from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), with regards to the project. Explain how the concerns of these agencies have been met. 20 A protected species survey was conducted on the property. Upon submitting a copy of the environmental supplement will be sent to the FFWCC and the USFWS. Since no known listed species were located or found to reside onsite, it is anticipated these agencies may not have concerns regarding listed species at this time. If an issue arises with the agencies during SFWMD permitting, they will be met according to the permit conditions. h. Other. L For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with the marina sitting and other criteria in the Manatee Protection Plan. ii. Include the results of any environmental assessments and /or audits of the property. If applicable, provide a narrative of the cost and measures needed to clean up the site. Not applicable, there are no dockingfacilities. ii. Include the results of any environmental assessments and /or audits of the property. If applicable, provide a narrative of the cost and measures needed to clean up the site. -- A protected species survey was performed; it is attached. There has been no Phase One Environmental Audit performed for the site to our knowledge. iii. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern - Special Treatment (ACSC -ST) overlay district, show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations established for the ACSC -ST. Not applicable. iv. Soil sampling or ground water monitoring reports and programs shall be required for sites that occupy old farm fields, old golf courses or for which there is a reasonable basis for believing that there has been previous contamination on site. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by the Environmental Services staff along with the Pollution Control Department and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. A small portion of the site was previously cleared and possibly utilized for farming, Site development to the east and south in the remaining portion would have already tested similar areas. Since their proximity and use were of the same field, there is no 21 reasonable basis for which that area may have been previously contaminated. v. Provide documentation from the Florida Master Site File, Florida Department of State and any printed historic archaeological surveys that have been conducted on the project area. Locate any known historic or archaeological sites and their relationships to the proposed project design. Demonstrate how the project design preserves the historic /archaeological integrity of the site. A request has been made to the Florida Department of State to research the Master Site File. The response indicated no previously recorded resources within this parcel. Additional formal review of the project as a whole will be completed in conjunction with the permitting with the South Florida Water Management District. 5. Additional data. The County Manager or his designee may require additional data or information necessary in order to make a thorough and complete evaluation of the EIS and project. 6. Relation between EIS and development of regional impact (DRI). In any instance where the proposed project requires both an EIS and a DRI, their data may be embodied in one report provided such report includes all the required information on both the EIS and DRI. and DRI. 22 Ian maul, d&rnmhje 1 1000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4, Fort Myers, Florida, 33966 Phone:(239) 418 -0671 Fax:(239) 418 -0672 KIMBERLY SCHLACHTA Environmental Scientist AREA OF EXPERTISE Environmental science applications involved in completing environmental assessments, delineating jurisdictional wetlands with State and Federal Agencies, performing wildlife surveys, species management plans, wetlands monitoring and permit compliance, vegetation and habitat mapping, utilizing GIS /GPS, and environmental permitting. EDUCATION Auburn University, B.S. Environmental Science, College of Engineering, 1997 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Florida Association of Soil Scientists CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES Ms. Schlachta conducts extensive fieldwork, in Southwest Florida and subsequently produces the following types of reports /surveys: protected species surveys, wetland surveys (feasibility\ environmental land use planning), wetlands monitoring, and wildlife monitoring. In addition, she is involved with wildlife and wetlands permitting with State and Federal regulatory agencies along with permit compliance. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Ms. Schlachta has acquired substantial environmental experience conducting fieldwork and producing reports and applications for wetland and wildlife surveys, wetlands monitoring, species management plans, environmental land use planning and development, and environmental permitting. A native of Southwest Florida, she also has over eight years of full time experience in Lee, Collier, Charlotte, Glades, Okeechobee, and Hendry counties, working with Boylan Environmental Consultants. In the process, she has worked with a wide range of engineers, planners, developers and agencies. She has conducted land assessments and wetland determinations with regulatory agencies. Ms. Schlachta also performs protected species surveys that include Local and Federally listed species such as the Gopher Tortoise, Big Cypress Fox Squirrel, Florida Scrub Jay, the Red - Cockaded Woodpecker, Audubon,s Crested Caracara and Bald Eagle. She has also spent time at Cecil Webb Wildlife Refuge to study and learn the sounds and flight patterns of the Red - cockaded woodpecker. Before joining Boylan Environmental Consultants, she worked with entomologists at the University of Florida to reestablish and monitor the population of the endangered Schaus Swallowtail Butterfly in the Florida Keys. Locally, she has worked at the Nature Center helping to educate others on local environmental issues. She has also worked in Costa Rica with the CCC (Caribbean Conservation Commission) monitoring and tagging nesting sea turtle. Management practices of the endangered Giant Tortoise were also studied while at the Charles Darwin Research Station in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. NOU -2B -2005 11:28 i/ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF SPATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES November 28, 2005 Alicia Lewis BEC, Inc. 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, FL 33912 Fax: 239-418-0672 Dear Ms. Lewis: In response to your inquiry of November 21, 2005, the Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources in the following parcels: T5IS, R26E, Section 3 In interpreting the results of our search, please remember the following points: Areas which have not been completely surveyed, such as yours, may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, unrecorded historically important structures, or both. As you may know, state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some projects. Record searches by the staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute such a review of cultural resources. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance Review Section of the Bureau of Historic Preservation at 850- 245 -6333 or at this address. Sincerely, � Michelle Caldwell Cremer Data Analyst, Florida Master Site File Division of Historical Resources R. A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 Phone: 850-245-6440 State SunCom: 205 -6440 Fax line: 650 -245 -6439 Email: fmsft1&@dos.state..l.us Web: http: //www.das.state. l.usldhrlmst7 Em 500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 , http: / /www.flheritagt.com ❑ Director's Office Q Archaeological Research 0 Historic FceseNation b Hiatntical Mmeums (850) 245 -6300 • FAX: 2456435 (850) 245 -6444 • FAX: 2456436 (850) 2456333 • FAX: 245.6437 (850) 2456400 • FAX: 2456433 Cl Palm Beach Regional Office ❑ St Augwtine Regional Office Cl Tampa Regional Office (561) 279 -1475 • FAX: 279 -1476 (904) 8253045 • PAX: 825.5044 (813) 2725843 • FAX: 272 -2340 TOTAL P.03 Tamiami Crossing PUD PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. July 17, 2006 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT A. Installation of protective barriers and signage. All protective barriers shall be installed and maintained for the period of time beginning with the commencement of any phase of land clearing or building operations and ending with the completion of that phase of the construction work on the site, unless otherwise approved to be removed by the development services director's field representative. All protective barriers shall be installed pursuant to the Tree Protection Manual for Builders and Developers, division of forestry, State of Florida or other methods approved by the Development services director. Signage shall be placed around the preserve areas to identify and protect the preserve during construction. The boundary of the Preserve shall be posted with appropriate signage denoting the area as a Preserve. Sign(s) should note that the posted area is a protected area. The signs shall be no closer than ten feet from residential property lines; be limited to a maximum height of four feet and a maximum size of two square feet; and otherwise comply with Section 2.5.6. Maximum sign spacing shall be 300 feet. B. Exotic Vegetation Removal, Non - native Vegetation and Nuisance or Invasive Plant Control. Wetland preserves, conservation areas, preserves, open space areas, and undeveloped portions of the property will be walked and all non - native and nuisance or invasive plant species shall be removed from all preserves (per LCD 3.9.7.1.G). These plants will be killed in a manner consistent with current exotic and nuisance plant removal practices while ensuring that neighboring plants are left unharmed and the soil left as undisturbed as possible. All Category I Exotics shall be removed from all preserves. All exotic within the first 75 feet of the outer edge of every preserve shall be physically removed, or the tree cut down to grade and the stump treated. Treated vegetation debris may be left in place, however, In the case where the extent of exotic vegetation is such that the resultant cut debris from the woody vegetation would create a physical impediment to the colonization of native plants, the exotic vegetation shall be removed from the preserve, or cut and stacked in a manner that will minimize the impediment to re- vegetation by native plant species. The log cabin or teepee methods are recommended. Where aesthetics is a concern, debris should be removed from the area. Trees too large to practicably cut or remove, may be girdled and sprayed with a herbicide and left standing, however, dead trees left standing may pose a physical hazard. When prohibited exotic vegetation is removed, but the base of the vegetation remains, the base shall be treated with an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved herbicide and a visual tracer dye shall be applied. In all cases, the approval method may not involve mechanical removal, whereby machinery is used to remove the exotics, except under the direction of a biologist. When exotic vegetation exists in high densities, mechanical removal must be approved by County staff. C. Annual Maintenance. Wetland preserves, conservation areas, preserves, open space areas, and undeveloped portions of the property will be walked and inspected at least once yearly for the presence of exotic vegetation. The maintenance program will be conducted in perpetuity. D. General Maintenance. Preserves shall be maintained in their natural state and must be kept free of refuse and debris. E. Monitoring. An annual monitoring report will be provided to Collier County for 5 years documenting the exotic maintenance and the will contain the following: Panoramic Photographs from 4 Photo points Percent coverage of exotic and nuisance plant species Survival of planted material Wildlife observations G. Designation of a Preserve Manager. A Preserve Manager shall be identified as the responsible party to ensure that the Preserve Management Plan is being complied with. The developer shall also be identified. Both parties will be responsible until such time that the homeowners association takes over the management of the preserve. At that time, the homeowner's association shall amend the plan to provide the homeowner association information and information regarding the person hired by the association to manage the preserve. The homeowner's association and the preserve manager shall be responsible for annual maintenance of the preserve, in perpetuity. Preserve Manager: Boylan Environmental 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, FL 33919 (239) 418 -0671 Developer. To Be Determined G. Wildlife Habitat Management. No listed species were observed on this site. H. Allowable Uses Within Preserve Areas. Passive recreational uses such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks are allowed within the preserve areas, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required vegetation. For the purpose of this section, passive recreational uses are those uses that would allow limited access to the preserve in a manner that will not cause any negative impacts to the preserve, such as pervious pathways, benches and educational signs are permitted in the preserve. Fences may be utilized outside of the preserves to provide protection in the preserves in accordance with the protected species section 3.11.3.1.C. Fences and walls are not permitted within the preserve area. lNbVt:U I IUNJ SHALL OF REQUIRED FOR ALL PRESERVES The preserve areas shall be inspected in accordance with the following schedule: 1. Prior to preliminary acceptance of the phase of the required subdivision improvements; 2. Within the associated phase of the final site development plan prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD Protected Species Survey ffethmd& ffildhte Siovo a; F.` onnr¢nfn/ Permm)Imv, 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida, 33912 Phone: (239) 418 -0671 Fax: (239) 418 -0672 November 9, 2005 July 18, 2006 INTRODUCTION Two environmental scientists from Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc conducted a field investigation on the f acre property on September 30, 2005 and October 27, 2005. The purpose of this field investigation was to identify the presence of protected species and habitat. FLUCCS mapping has already been conducted on the property. The survey was conducted on September 30 between the hours of 10:00am and 4:00pm and on October 27 from 11:00am to 1:00pm. During the site inspection on September 30, 2005 the temperature was in the mid to high 80's ranging from 82 °F to 89.1 °F. It was partly cloudy outside with a breeze from 5.8 mph to 11.5 mph east northeast. On October 27, 2005 the temperatures were in the high 60's to low 70's ranging from 67.1 °F to 73.8 °F. A slight breeze blew 9.2 mph toward the northeast. The skies were clear. The site is located in portions of Section 3, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. Specifically, it is located directly south of US 41 and east of CR 951. SURVEY METHODOLOGY The property was surveyed for the presence of listed species in accordance with the overlapping belt transects method as outlined by Kevin L. Erwin, Consulting Ecologists Inc.. This method is comprised of a several step process. First, vegetation communities or land -uses on the property or study area are delineated on an aerial photograph based on nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS). Next, the FLUCFCS codes or land - use types found on the property are cross - referenced with the Collier County Protected Species List. This protected species list names the species that have a probability of occurring in any particular FLUCFCS community. Then, each community is searched in the field for the species listed for that particular FLUCCS type. An intensive pedestrian survey is conducted using parallel belt transects that are approximately 6 feet apart as a means of searching for plants and animals. In addition, periodic "stop - look - listen" and quiet stalking methods are conducted for animals. Signs or sightings of these species are then recorded and are marked in the field with flagging tape. The table at end of this report fists the FLUCFCS communities found on the property and the corresponding species that have the potential of occurring in them Transects were walked approximately as shown on the attached aerial photograph. Particular attention was placed upon locating potential fox squirrel nests, locating RCW cavity trees, and eagle's nests within the forested portions of the property. Nearly 100 percent of the property that was considered as potential tortoise habitat was surveyed. SITE CONDITIONS The temperature varied greatly on the two survey days. On September 30, 2005 the temperature was in the 80's, on October 27, 2005 the temperature ranged from the high 60's to mid 70's. On both days there was a fight breeze with clear to partly cloudy skies during the field investigations. The site was undeveloped, but appears to have a long history of disturbance from agricultural use. The site has remained fallow and natural strands of vegetation are present. Listed below are the vegetation communities or land -uses identified on the site as shown on the attached protected species survey map. See Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation 1999) for definitions. Uplands Wetlands 260 Other Open Lands (1.51 +/- acres) This upland community has a nearly absent canopy with scattered live oak, slash pine, java plum, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. The mid- canopy and shrubs that were present include wax, myrtle and Brazilian pepper. Other vegetation found in the groundcover includes grape vine, dog fennel, button weed, smilax, nut sedge, forger grass, broom sedge, chocolate weed, black root, and poison ivy. This area has firrrows and swales reminiscent of an abandoned agriculture row crop field. However, current agricultural usage could not be determined. 411 Pine Flatwoods (8.83 + /- acres) This upland forested community has a canopy dominated by Florida slash pine with scattered cabbage palm. The sub - canopy in some areas consisted of scattered Brazilian pepper, live oak, myrsine, beauty berry, downy rose myrtle, and scattered melaleuca. Saw palmetto dominated most of the under story in these areas. Other vegetation noted includes sumac, smilax, poison ivy, love vine, grape vine, black root, finger grass, wax myrtle, and ear leaf acacia. Some disturbed spoil piles were noted within this mapping area near U.S. 41. 422 Brazilian Pepper (0.41 + /- acres) This upland forested community has a canopy dominated by Slash Pine and Brazilian Pepper. Brazilian pepper also dominates the mid -story in this area. The highly disturbed area is located in the northwest comer of the property and is adjacent to commercial lands. 624 Pine - Cypress - Cabbage Palm (12.18 + /- acres) This community has a canopy comprised of scattered cypress, cabbage palm, laurel oak, red maple, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and Florida slash pine. The sub -canopy is comprised of saltbush, scattered buttonbush, melaleuca, wild coffee, myrsine, cypress, Brazilian pepper and wax myrtle. The under story was dominated by swamp fern in most areas with other vegetation including blue maidencane, pluchea rosea, dog fennel, St. John 's Wort, hydrocotyle, tickseed, spartina, yellow -eyed grass, saw grass, with some scatted areas of grapevine or poison ivy. This community was the most common found throughout the site. The hydrology of these areas seems highly altered from the adjacent development and drainage, as noted by the presence of transitional species. 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods (1.47 + /- acres) This wetland community has a sparse canopy comprised of scattered Slash pine. Other canopy trees noted include cypress, dahoon holly, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy species noted included scattered buttonbush, saltbush and wax myrtle. Ground cover was dominated by grasses and herbaceous vegetation. These hydric species included hat pins, St. John's Wort, panic grass, beak rush, spartina, and blue maidencane. 830H Utility Easement (Hydric) (0.18 + /- acres) This herbaceous wetland community was dominated by blue maidencane in most areas with other vegetation including St. John's Wort, tickseed, smilax, saw grass, dog fennel, yellow eyed grass, beak rush, hat pins, and forked panic grass. Table 1: FLUCCS COMMUNITIES BY PERCENTAGE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION ACRES PERCENT 260 Other Open Lands 1.51 6.1% 411 Pine Flatwoods 8.83 35.90/6 422 Brazilian Pepper 0.41 1.7% 624 Pine-Cypress-Cabbage Palm 12.18 49.6% 625 H dric Pine Flatwoods 1.47 6.0% 830H Utility Easement Hydric 0.18 0.7% Total 24.58 100% *Total Wetland *Total Upland SPECIES PRESENCE 13.83 0.56% 10.75 0.46% During our field survey for protected species on the property, we did not observe any listed or protected species. No tortoise burrows were identified. No nest like structures were observed. We did observe burrows belonging to armadillos, which were not marked in the field. There was no evidence that these burrows were being used by gopher tortoises. While no wading birds were observed during the survey it would be expected that wading birds may utilize the onsite wetlands. Based on a review of the latest bald eagle nest site map for the 2002 -2003 season, no eagle nests were documented to occur close enough to impact the property. The nearest documented eagle nest was approximately situated over two miles to the west southwest of the property. DISCUSSION During the survey for protected species no protected species or signs thereof were identified. Other species observed include the presence of gray squirrels, raccoons, rabbits, a downy woodpecker and evidence of other small mammal usage on the property. Table. Protected species having the potential to occur in the corresponding FLUCFCS community or land -types with corresponding held survey results. FLUCCS Potential Listed Species % Coverage Present Absent Density Visibility ft 260 None 100 20 411 Beautiful Pawpaw 100 X 20 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel 100 X 20 Eastern Indigo Snake 100 X 20 Fakahatchee Burmannia 100 X 20 Florida Black Bear 100 X 20 Florida Coontie 100 X 20 Florida Panther 100 X 20 Gopher Frog 100 X 20 Gopher Tortoise 100 X 20 Red - Cockaded Woodpecker 100 X 20 Satin leaf 100 X 20 Southeastern American Kestrel 100 X 20 Twisted Air Plant 100 X 20 422 NONE 75 20 624 American Alligator 90 X 20 Ever lades Mink 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 Gopher Frog 90 X 20 Little Blue Heron 90 X 20 Snowy Egret 90 X 20 Tricolored Heron 90 X 20 Wood Stork 90 X 20 625 American Alligator 90 X 20 Everglades Mink 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 Gopher Frog 90 X 20 Little Blue Heron 90 X 20 Snowy Egret 90 X 20 Tricolored Heron 90 X 20 Wood Stork 90 X 20 830 NONE I -- -- 20 6 W18 veep � ii6i_OIIIW.q*B6 M%1 ®ice. NNIY6'WI� Y1YifdAg".9.0 It Zz � � y . �. . § • # !¢ )N:� -- / � ) h � ! , �/ Z . s �2 ! \ Q !R ! \ � -- — -- � - - - -- � <� § •' � a` w Y 0 w i w y O � V) g 41 O w ya O � y vii L 0 E CL W J Q Q N ca WJ o Jb a= U o cts H . \ \ =\ \ \\ o W N 0 ON m � � � m P 0 R 1 tl a m a: N aaW a \ \ /j % /Z\ \} { * {w ® \ \\ { ® }Eƒ\ }§\ §} « _�_�{ ./ 114, 1 < C14� . X 2 z < \ C4 04\ . §» to to 04 ° �` Q S a_ / E 0 k / } E E w ! \ / } /\\ 40 rti ku ILI 9 'Zel A . �. .a . �\ �� `� \\ , \/ y�� a Y .a �1 I� ` G Ill�i I t i'!1��:0 Y plall it 1�91i it iiY �lailieillifi� IR I1u111filGl [it nIIur111111111 •a ..... nH1.r.. M a.laava 1,911133 aQ wrw arwr.. F, NSA a Y .a �1 I� ` G Ill�i I t i'!1��:0 Y plall it 1�91i it iiY �lailieillifi� IR I1u111filGl [it nIIur111111111 •a ..... nH1.r.. M a.laava 1,911133 aQ wrw arwr.. � x«42x . 00 IX ! \oo6N \ k � \ter « \k{ 2 3{[%2» \ �}\ \\ \ { \\ � k §) §/2 k n � < « � \, \� �« w .� .. ■ z�{ ! � »� � q \So 0 2 } o , � m � X 2 %j Z CO CN Clq QD Cp C'q uj Uj to C\l 0 CO n-, :t C14 (a X CO CN Clq QD Cp C'q k Ql� \ \ \ \\ � , % 2 / - � � \ , k \ « �)f` 5 . % \ \ )t[m /f\ GIN 2 « § § \\ 2 2 ��\ m„ ewe f» >® k \ cu . Q u . � \ o E � :. as , « \ 0 . , ! � < / \ ■ .c \ C\3 \ ; m | ` q : � C%4 . . . .�.. ! !� ! | |/ z i ■! |! | |! 06 / Lp co �« cz� C-3 cm BI ) / I : y \`� \ cl 8- 2 cc) Len V- ? rq cm cn W 0 z 15 C'm $ co uj C\l N tr) C\l C14 \ ��\ Moo �LL YB -..V o• N; z� P, Q d Cv} d C7 i i L- -j r L O a ti d" J U 0 C LL �. Q � r o® N ,; CO oama`x Oti NC-OO c;Jo- N NNE) N tl° tl- O O GS YB -..V o• N; z� P, Q d Cv} d C7 i i L- -j 0 e 5 9 Yy � ! O ti d" P� r o® N ,; CO N � 0 e 5 9 Yy � ! ti d" P� r N ,; CO 0 e 5 9 Yy � ! U d U U U U U U ro ro° m ro m ro ) ro (I C-) v r o v m It v O N M I- Q M W + W 11 IY Q � ° "< j Q � m N a W U e G Wm a m O N Q o `U 3 cu W o f n % ° In 2 W ( w x J o Q CO � . � Q1 6 o O W m 3a act Z ? (p W p (u(j�.o N a J ALL Ua N U> N N N a c ro w LL O m a t .. 0) 2 ¢ <} . w .`.` p Q CL U C/) D o z N cW7 CO M D F— ? OLO V CC) (0 z $ � m 0 N o U N U N N (p (p I-E w N LO V/ N �C rr F C ej��n w u 9 G GVr u V { [ Co CO 2 ( \ ° ° / \ e \ m cr / } \ \ 1 m ` co ± \ {( ^ CL. t \/\ j \ cz 2 C, U- E \ o § \{ / ° ` {2& ®§ 2 \ \ / \ \ \ r \\j) // H x \ \�i ) k O g t+\ z / ( \ \ R 2 » � 0 ? » \ / / - ^ « a ®t!: z - -_{ ■ C J1 Q� Pl- zn V SW R • vl 'lam ��\`] 4 02 C lzi c s 4 c fV u c S 1 ' V V i i i rL / y J 5 C yq� LL t15 i® a u7 tt3 e Y C v C F � c C pmt Ct� I w a. ip- i �a Thy <M7 •y,. i� yl co. 1 i i rL / y J 5 C yq� LL t15 i® a u7 tt3 e Y C v C F � c C THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit V.D.5 Suitability and Compatibility Analysis The proposed small scale comprehensive plan amendment intends to expand the boundary of Mixed Use Activity Center #18 by approximately 7.3 acres. The subject property lies immediately cast of the existing Activity Center 918 boundary and a portion of this property was formerly within the activity center. The site has roadway frontage on U.S. 41 East and lies approximately one -fourth mile east of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and U.S. 41 East. The use of the property in support of land uses consistent with the mixed use activity center designation is also compatible with surrounding existing and planned development. The South Naples Planning Community continues to show strong residential growth, and community and regional level commercial shopping needs are also growing. The property is presently designated as Urban Mixed Use, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map. Under this designation, the property qualifies for a maximum residential density of three dwelling units per acre, due to its location seaward of the Traffic Congestion Boundary for conventional housing. The affordable housing bonus density provision is available within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, however, with a maximum residential density of 11 dwelling units per acre. The small size of the parcel, 7.3 acres is not of sufficient size or an appropriate location to make it economically viable to develop 21 market rate dwelling units. Likewise, the parcel does not yield enough dwelling units to make it economically viable for development of up to 56 affordable housing units. Further, given the proximity to existing affordable housing, additional affordable housing at this location would not be consistent with Policy 1.4 of the Housing Element, which states that affordable housing will be distributed equitably throughout Collier County. Based on market analysis by the property owner, it has been determined that the highest and best use of the property is in support of community commercial development. The South Naples Planning Community has a severe shortage of commercially zoned property of sufficient size to accommodate community and regional commercial development. Further discussion on this aspect of the suitability for commercial development is discussed below. Environmental Considerations The property is suitable for commercial development due to several site factors. There are no environmental constraints that would restrict development on the site. An environmental assessment of the subject site and properties under common ownership was prepared by Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. Their assessment identified that much of the site has been altered through past agricultural use. The native upland vegetation that does exist on the site will be required to be preserved consistent with Exhibit V.D.doo Pagel of 3 KITE951PLN Policy 6. 1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. A copy of the Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. environmental assessment has been attached for reference. Surrounding Land Use The property is proximate to planned and developed commercial development. Property immediately north across U.S. 41 is zoned and developed with intensive commercial development. The property immediately to the south is located within the Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict future land use category and is zoned as the Artesa Pointe PUD. This adjacent property is developed with a Wa1Mart Supercenter and a Habitat for Humanity residential community. The subject property abuts the water management and preservation area of this adjacent project. The companion CPUD rezoning application to the proposed small -scale plan amendment identifies that the subject parcel will be utilized for native vegetation and water management, consistent with that in the adjacent Artesa Pointe PUD. No environmental or water management issues have been identified which would prohibit or restrict development on the site. With the companion commercial rezoning application (Tamiami Crossings CPUD), the overall project size is approximately 25 acres, which is the appropriate size to accommodate a community or regional commercial development. The Tamiami Crossings CPUD proposes 235,000 square feet of retail, service and office development on the 25 +/- acres property, which does include the subject 7.3 acre site. The inclusion of the subject parcel allows for access spacing to be coordinated with the balance of the activity center's development to the northwest, and will provide for pedestrian and vehicular interconnection with the adjacent Artesa Pointe PUD to the south. Commercial Land Availability Collier County Completed an update to the county -wide commercial land use inventory in 2005. We have reviewed the data for the South Naples Planning Community and note that there is a severe shortage of community and regional commercial sites, as there are only three vacant commercially zoned properties exceeding 20 acres in size. A copy of the South Naples commercial inventory has been attached as reference. The 20 acre threshold was utilized as representative of the approximate parcel size necessary to support community level retail commercial land uses. Of the three vacant parcels identified, one 35 acre parcel is located in the Westport Commerce Center PUD. In reviewing the parcel ID number provided in the 2005 Collier County Commercial Inventory, this property is no longer vacant and has been developed as a WalMart Super Center. One of the other parcels is identified as a 25 acre vacant tract located at the intersection of Grand Lely Drive and Lely Resort Boulevard in the Lely Resort PUD. In reviewing the PUD document and master plan, the vacant parcel is designated as RC, Resort Center. The RC district does permit hotel and related retail and conference facilities as well as cluster and multi - family residential development. The parcel does not have frontage or Exhibit V.D.Aoc Paget of 3 KrrE951PLN visibility on either Collier Boulevard or U.S. 41, the two external collector and arterial roadways bordering the Lely Resort PUD, which makes this parcel undesirable for traditional community commercial land uses, which to require high visibility and direct accessibility to collector and arterial roadways. This parcel's highest and best use potential is best suited as either destination resort hotel or multi- family residential development. The third parcel identified is a 30.45 acre PUD tract which is identified by an invalid property identification number. This parcel is further identified as being located within Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. The property appraiser records for Section 3 were evaluated and no 30.45 acre parcel was identified. The research did reveal a 40 acre PUD zoned property within Section 3, which is owned by WalMart. If it is assumed that this is the misidentified parcel, it is no longer vacant and is under construction as a new 233,000 square feet Wa1Mart Super Center. Our research did not identify any other property within Section 3 that was sized in the 30 to 40 acre range. Summary The subject property's location near the intersection of U.S. 41 and Collier Boulevard represents an ideal location for community and regional levels of commercial development due to access to both arterial roadways with easy linkage to I -75. The project is also positioned between the growing employment and residential corridor linking Marco Island with the urbanizing Collier Boulevard corridor north of U.S. 41, making the site ideally suited to serve an existing and growing population base. The subject property's location also permits it to be incorporated into a unified planned development where shared and coordinated access can be provided. Expansion of Activity Center #18 to include the additional 7.3 acres of property will provide for a unified project (Tamiami Crossings CPUD) of sufficient size to accommodate needed community and regional commercial development that is compatible with the adjacent and nearby development. Exhibit V.D..doc Page 3 of 3 KITE951 PLN Kite 25.45 Acres Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Environmental Assessment Boylan Wetland & Wildlife Su"ey anmental Permitting, 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 202, Fort Myers, Florida, 33912 Phone:(239) 418 -0671 Fax:(239) 418 -0672 May 23, 2005 Kite 25.45 Acres INTRODUCTION The site is located in a portion of Section 3, Township 51, and Range 26, in Collier County, Florida and is situated directly south of U.S. 41 and directly east of C.R 951. A portion of the site appears to have a history of disturbance from agricultural use. However it has remained fallow for some time and natural strands of vegetation have recurred throughout the site. Some furrows, spoil piles, and small berms are evident in areas throughout the site. An Environmental scientist conducted a field investigation on the Kite property during May of 2005. The purpose of the investigations was to identify the potential for either US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps or COE) and / or South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) jurisdictional wetlands and for the potential of listed (endangered, threatened, etc.) species inhabiting the site that are regulated by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC). The Corps and the SFWMD are the regulatory agencies that regulate development activities in wetlands. In general, to be considered wetlands by the Corps or the SFWMD, the area should contain hydric soils, exhibit wetland hydrology, and contain wetland vegetation. The SFWMD does not need all criteria to determine jurisdiction. Currently, the Corps does not regulate isolated wetlands. In making the determination on whether the wetlands are isolated, the Corps looks at if water leaves the site, i.e. ditches or whether the wetlands are completely contained onsite or extend offsite. If the wetlands extend offsite, they will more than likely assert jurisdiction. In this case wetlands onsite are contiguous or are connected to existing COE Jurisdictional wetlands. Those wetlands would be considered fall under COE Jurisdiction. Existim Site Conditions Because hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and wetland vegetation are needed for an area to be considered wetlands, a search of the property was conducted for indicators of these. SOILS Hydric soils are identified by certain characteristics that are unique to wetland soils. Wetland hydrology is normally present if the soil is saturated or inundated for a long duration sometime during the growing season, which normally occurs during the wet season. In our region, the wet season occurs in the summer and early fall, therefore, if an area exhibits soil saturation or is inundated for a period of time the area is considered to have wetland hydrology. In the absence of visual signs of saturation or inundation, one may use hydrologic indicators such as adventitious rooting, lichen lines, or algal matting. Wetland vegetation is present if the majority of the plants that are present are ones that are adapted to saturated soil conditions. The soils on the property have been mapped by the Natural Recourses Conservation Commission (NRCS), which show that the majority of the site consists of Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum. These are listed as hydric soils for both local and national listing. See attached map for NRCS mappings. The other soils found on the subject parcel include Hallandale fine sand, a 2 Kite 25.45 Acres non - hydric soil. These mappings are general in nature, but can provide a certain level of information about the site as to the possible extent of wetland area. The following is a summary discussion of the locations of the soils found on the site. 14 —PINEDA fine sand, limestone substratum These hydric soils are found around most of the site and are typically found in sloughs. 11 — HALLANDALE fine sand These soils are found in the north central portion of the site and are typically found in upland pine flatwoods. VEGETATION Vegetation communities were mapped in the field according to the system in use by the agencies, the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCCS). Vegetation is one parameter used in determining the presence of a wetland, and these communities mappings will generally reflect whether an area could be considered as wetland, although the presence of wetland hydrology and hydric soil are also technically required. The attached FLUCCS map shows these communities. (The boundary as shown on the mapping includes a total of 25.45 acres) Uplands The following community would likely be considered as upland. There may be no wetland mitigation required for impacts to these non - jurisdictional areas. Approximately +/- 11.37 acres of uplands were identified on site. 260 Other Open Lands (3.01 + /- acres) This upland community has a nearly absent canopy with scattered live oak, slash pine, java plum, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. Midstory and shrubs present include wax, myrtle and Brazilian pepper. Other vegetation found in the groundcover includes grape vine, dog fennel, button weed, smilax, nut sedge, finger grass, broom sedge, chocolate weed, black root, and poison ivy. This area has furrows and swales reminiscent of an abandoned agriculture row crop field. However, current agricultural could not be determined. This area is underlain by hydric soils. No signs of hydrology or hydrologic indicators were present. Due to the dominance of upland vegetation and lack of hydrology, it is unlikely this area would be considered jurisdictional by the agencies. ki Kite 25.45 Acres 411 Pine Flatwoods (7.95 + /- acres) This upland forested community has a canopy dominated by Florida slash pine with scattered cabbage palm. The sub - canopy in some areas consisted of scattered Brazilian pepper, live oak, myrsine, beauty berry, downy rose myrtle, and scattered melaleuca. Saw palmetto dominated most of the under story in these areas. Other vegetation noted includes sumac, smilax, poison ivy, love vine, grape vine, black root, finger grass, wax myrtle, and ear leaf acacia. Some disturbed spoil piles were noted within this mapping area near U.S. 41. A portion of the areas mapped as pine flatwoods are underlain by non - hydric soils, and some are underlain by hydric soils. No signs of hydrology were noted in these areas. Due to the dominance of upland vegetation and lack of hydrology, it is anticipated these areas would not be considered as jurisdictional by the agencies. 422 Brazilian Pepper (0.41 + /- acres) This upland forested community has a canopy dominated by Slash Pine and Brazilian Pepper. Brazilian pepper also dominates the midstory in this area. The highly disturbed area is located in the North West corner of the property and adjacent to commercial lands. No signs of hydrology were located in this area. Although this community is underlain by hydric soils, the vegetation is not dominated by wetland vegetation. It is anticipated this area would not be considered as jurisdictional by the agencies. Wetlands These areas are underlain by hydric soils. Based on the presence and dominance of wetland vegetation and signs of hydrology, the following communities would likely be considered as wetlands. Wetland vegetation is present if the majority of the plants that are present are ones that are adapted to saturated soil conditions. SFWMD and the Corps may consider these areas as jurisdictional areas. Mitigation would be required for impacts to these areas. Approximately 14.07 +/- acres of wetlands were identified on site. 624 Pine - Cypress- Cabbage Palm (12.19 + /- acres) This community has a canopy comprised of scattered cypress, cabbage palm, laurel oak, red maple, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and Florida slash pine. The sub - canopy is comprised of saltbush, scattered buttonbush, melaleuca, wild coffee, myrsine, cypress, Brazilian pepper and wax myrtle. The under story was dominated by swamp fern in most areas with other vegetation including blue maidencane, pluchea, dog fennel, St. John's Wort, hydrocotyle, tickseed, spartina, yellow -eyed grass, saw grass, with some scatted areas of grapevine or poison ivy. This community was the most common found throughout the site. The hydrology of these areas seems highly altered from the adjacent development and 4 Kite 25.45 Acres drainage, as noted by the presence of transitional species. However, some signs of hydrology were noted throughout. These hydrological indicators included algal matting, lichen lines, and adventitious rooting. This community is underlain by hydric soils throughout the site, is dominated by wetland vegetation, and also includes signs of hydrology. It is anticipated this area would be considered as jurisdictional by the agencies. 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods (1.70 + /- acres) This wetland community has a sparse canopy comprised of scattered Slash pine. Other canopy trees noted include cypress, dahoon holly, and cabbage palm. The sub- canopy species noted included scattered buttonbush, saltbush and wax myrtle. Ground cover was dominated by grasses and herbaceous vegetation. These hydric species included hat pins, St. John's Wort, Panic grass, Beak rush, Spartina, maidencane, and Blue maidencane. This area is underlain by hydric soils and is dominated by wetland vegetation. Algal matting was also present in areas. It is anticipated this area would be considered as jurisdictional by the agencies. 830 Utility Easement (Hydric) (0.18+ /- acres) This herbaceous wetland community was dominated by blue maidencane in most areas with other vegetation including St. John's Wort, tickseed, smilax, saw grass, dog fennel, yellow eyed grass, maidencane, beak rush, hat pins, and forked panic grass. This area is underlain by hydric soils, and algal matting was present during the field inspection. Since it is also dominated wetland tolerant vegetation it is anticipated this area may be considered as jurisdictional by the agencies. Listed Species A formal protected species survey has not been conducted on the site at this time. However, no evidence of listed species was observed during the preliminary site inspection. A formal Protected Species Survey would be needed prior to development to determine the presence of listed species. During the site inspection several non- listed species were observed or noted. These include: gray squirrel, evidence of rabbits, a black racer, cardinal, and several vultures. Small animal burrows were observed in the spoil areas, but were not associated with potential Gopher tortoise. Currently, the Corps is in the process of implementing the EIS in Southwest Florida. Contained within the EIS are SLOPES, Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species, for many of the species that are frequently the topic of Consultation with the FWS. The following is -- a brief discussion, but the entire EIS with slopes can be found at http: / /www. saj.usace. anny.mil /permit/hot _topics /SFLAEIS /contents.htm. Kite 25.45 Acres It is anticipated the following would be the most likely listed species concerns on this parcel with regards to SLOPES. Bald Eagle The nearest known Bald Eagle nest is over 2500 feet west of the site boundary. This may preclude the agencies from having specific concerns about this particular species. Red - cockaded Woodpecker This parcel is located within the Red - cockaded woodpecker consultation area. Therefore, a Protected Species Survey specifically targeting the RCW may be required prior to development. This survey is a consecutive 14 -day, time specific survey required both in the late spring and fall. If this were required it would add to the time and cost to the project. Florida Panther This parcel is located within the Florida panther consultation area. Recently, for all projects within this area, the Corps has been required to receive a sign off from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) that the project will not impact the Florida panther. A map is attached that depicts the various zones and telemetry points in the project vicinity. There are several telemetry points located within a two -mile radius of the site. The FWS has been using a matrix to determine the value of project sites to panthers. Once they determine the value of the site for the panther, the FWS will most likely request off site mitigation to compensate for the impact to panther habitat. The FWS has not released the calculations that they have been using. The FWS could change their methodology and requirements at any time. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel There is a potential that Big Cypress fox squirrels may be present on site which is to be determined during the formal protected species survey. Listed Wading Bird Species Numerous species of wading birds including the federally endangered Wood Stork could be expected to use the wetland areas as foraging habitat throughout the year. Foraging Wood Storks have been documented in the vicinity; however no signs of nests or potential rookeries were noted during this preliminary site assessment. DISCUSSION Wetland locations were GPS located and drawn by using a non - rectified aerial with approximate property boundaries, hence their location, aerial extent, and acreage is approximate. Before any detailed site planning, it is recommended that the wetland lines be approved by the agencies and that professional land surveyors survey the wetland lines. Generally, with regard to impacts to wetlands, The Army Corps of Engineers does not regulate activities in isolated wetlands or the excavation of wetlands where there is only incidental fall 0 Bite 25.45 Acres back of fill material. The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Solid Water Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC) provides that the Corps does not have jurisdiction over isolated wetlands. Since this ruling there has been no guidance regarding how the Corps should define what an isolated wetland is. Currently the Corps position on most all wetlands is that the Corps has jurisdiction. With the Corps, impacts to wetlands that are less than 0.5 acres, the activity can usually be processed as a Nationwide Permit application. For projects with greater than 0.5 acres of impact the application will be processed as an individual permit application. This involves a public notice process and coordination with other federal agencies such as the EPA and the FWS. The SFWMD requires mitigation for impacts to wetlands, but usually no mitigation is required for impacts to isolated wetlands not used by listed (protected) species that are less than 0.5 acres in size. Impacts greater than 0.5 acres would require mitigation. Mitigation is a way to compensate for wetland impacts, which could consist of wetland enhancement, wetland creation, wetland preservation, upland compensation, or off- site mitigation. Mitigation costs and time involved usually increase with an increase in the proposed impacts. The site is also located near the Rookery Bay Natural Estuarine Research Reserve, which is managed by Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Projects in the vicinity can receive additional scrutiny and comments during the permitting review process. Collier County also has environmental requirements for native indigenous preservation for developments and should also be taken into consideration when planning a project. Specific details can be found at http://www.collier2ov.neUzoning/checklisUindex,htm, which lists the required information for site developments and zoning submittals. 7 0 m Z - --0] -W-U-<<< N O N 0 i U) CL Q 2 to U LL t U N (3) LL z m ►ld v � � s d� c- Ins -rnoln OOf -Rt• - ^-- N V f•j K O CV O + II J a o m c CO) m h U o m W m" m y m J a 0 L Z Lu O c o m e N a Q W 3 p m mU� cn m y N m ci U. .c 2m� ci OWN et Lo NV CCU [L N<t (0 CND N O to O d N O N CNO �D N 0 m Z - --0] -W-U-<<< N O N 0 i U) CL Q 2 to U LL t U N (3) LL z m ►ld v � � s d� n a w U m 10 m m m m cts o s 14) 0) co u Q C6Kd NCO 11 J 0 0 Z a o g W N h ) o y Z ma C) O a� m p W m 3a act CV W p m Cj a c, U) Q cd O a CIO v U V J �o NNN(� .' L �L C4 ",t cO(DN ct ) Ln N io C + Y CN4 ao OCY) V Lo +± N N+ z o � s m N U �h N + CO ''^^ LO Em�hs Z Cy N CV v �T a � ti h C r Q p F�Y 4f wW; Yoy wef UPSC092 eWlapory :pel eW 5ONV113MWewawasq le Nawuwlnu3 laaay 59'52 Wq \ale dTNl'13B\:% E L w .Q d ¢ C O w O C d ca HW W 0 y Q2 `� ��. ¢ C i Z L CL \ o C\j �m m � N 2 Oy fn m o N m tl zi � T { o y Z - �►-- O1a+1�I -KE � ~ q = f U) W J IL a z x O U) 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 i m�pp W m r M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O M n ut N N N N in p p u� N M OO U U U d U LL d p_ LL LL LL 4 C � v � O N � > O W J a a a a a m a E � u ➢ m o o E E E E E E LL' LL V E o E E E E E E L a U U U U U LL F L L L Y L L FI On O O O ll N LL O r n n a n o N c�apr.�ssssss d-m t: U ti m a N W A U U U U U U a�3z° °o Y�xxvv N N N N N N N N N N N tdV N fOV N N N N N N N N N lOV N i(1 �O VI M Yl N N YOi N N N � q b N � 2- Z Z f ZZ f f ZZ�L ALL z z t/J t/J N m m N m m 41 m m (Jl Y tt 0 ay pa N N M ° a a Fi 0 M r N N I h b N N N N N O O O O O O N m O O m n U U U N N „ U d N b � N N O r 7 N m N O N N N n r r N N [OV I ' r N O N O O O O O O N iD tO �O t0 b t0 U U J J J J J J� U a a a a a a m p y C -mm O N q N N O VI N N O Oi CI v d N m U h O N N m N Ip > > > O M O O y N C LL d m Z Ti Ti Ti Ti L m m m m m 'b o N O d � O O L O O O O J I N N m m m l/1 L 3 n w m w d a t - ry J J J J Z Z J 0 0 m N Z zz Z z Z Z d N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N YI N vOi YOi YOi N u01 V1 u� vl �o e yp 'qL 3 II A a m w z e¢ s m 5 ¢ N o o m `u 5 � r c I n Z a � 1616 16 m m m m N N N N v m v v Z Z Z Z N N N N N N N N N h m N maO�N �i° 4111000000Q U U U U a n n n n n U R smss s O — J D N N 7 N N N r cer r°16~16 a W a s 'o `o 'd `o o `o `o `o 0 0 0 0 0 OK 0 SN N b N R n N N N R ¢ A ¢.a z A 15 15 t5 i- d K� N vO N To ry m �v Ta W W W W W W w W W W W a r z z Oo' coJ UO Uo 0 ' Uo c7 Uo' U9 (oJ col U T T T o O m rn m m N N N N N N N ..... N N N N N N h i(1 N N N N YO1 m N N N Nm m m m m m m m m m m X o m n r. < 00 a a O O � Q ° m n O m O a� ai v U � S 3 o_ Y c aU m N � E A v v m m W W 0 0 J J �n n I mm¢ L 8$$ °n 6e6B8v &: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > a a n a a a a a n a a a « p N N N N N N N N N N N '12 0 0 0 0'' 0 0 0 5 z m v r m Z v S h z nQ a 35� `m m � -6 *6 r s m s m J�JsssasJJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e $ o a m v m m m v v v m m O O m A m m W m N p �°p' N y L m N N m m N O N IT) NNN Ul co N fn f/l °n M M m °n °n M °n m °n °m °m CI N tNV (NV N N N (NV tNV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N h YO1 N N N N N N N N N HJ m^moo °oo °_ °_m pl o'i f Z Z l N V1 f/1 N (nNN41mN NNm4 S a a « O U I ¢ U o� a� V N °m W v n m z Jn O o m O J .ti U m � N N N N N N _pp E N � N Y 3 4 Y Q Doti n m m n m m �NM 1 N o] Q m to n f1 th M OI N m N N N N N N O O O m N m N pN1 � N N N N m N 4 3 O a °o O N N I Z N II c tLL Z 0 N 4 4 a Q O O O O U U U U O OQi [QO m m m p O a LLyy a m w z e¢ s m 5 ¢ N o o m `u 5 � r c I n Z a � 1616 16 m m m m N N N N v m v v Z Z Z Z N N N N N N N N N h m N maO�N �i° 4111000000Q U U U U a n n n n n U R smss s O — J D N N 7 N N N r cer r°16~16 a W a s 'o `o 'd `o o `o `o `o 0 0 0 0 0 OK 0 SN N b N R n N N N R ¢ A ¢.a z A 15 15 t5 i- d K� N vO N To ry m �v Ta W W W W W W w W W W W a r z z Oo' coJ UO Uo 0 ' Uo c7 Uo' U9 (oJ col U T T T o O m rn m m N N N N N N N ..... N N N N N N h i(1 N N N N YO1 m N N N Nm m m m m m m m m m m X o m n r. < 00 a a O O � Q ° m n O m O a� ai v U � S 3 o_ Y c aU m N � E A v v m m W W 0 0 J J �n n I mm¢ L 8$$ °n 6e6B8v &: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > a a n a a a a a n a a a « p N N N N N N N N N N N '12 0 0 0 0'' 0 0 0 5 z m v r m Z v S h z nQ a 35� `m m � -6 *6 r s m s m J�JsssasJJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e $ o a m v m m m v v v m m O O m A m m W m N p �°p' N y L m N N m m N O N IT) NNN Ul co N fn f/l °n M M m °n °n M °n m °n °m °m CI N tNV (NV N N N (NV tNV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N h YO1 N N N N N N N N N HJ m^moo °oo °_ °_m pl o'i f Z Z l N V1 f/1 N (nNN41mN NNm4 S a a « O U I ¢ U o� a� V N °m W v n m z Jn O o m O J .ti U m � N N N N N N _pp E N � N Y 3 4 Y Q Doti n m m n m m �NM 1 N o] Q m to n f1 th M OI N m N N N N N N O O O m N m N pN1 � N N N N m N 4 3 O a °o O N N I Z N II c tLL Z 0 N 4 4 a Q U U U U « O N p m N OQi [QO m a m w z e¢ s m 5 ¢ N o o m `u 5 � r c I n Z a � 1616 16 m m m m N N N N v m v v Z Z Z Z N N N N N N N N N h m N maO�N �i° 4111000000Q U U U U a n n n n n U R smss s O — J D N N 7 N N N r cer r°16~16 a W a s 'o `o 'd `o o `o `o `o 0 0 0 0 0 OK 0 SN N b N R n N N N R ¢ A ¢.a z A 15 15 t5 i- d K� N vO N To ry m �v Ta W W W W W W w W W W W a r z z Oo' coJ UO Uo 0 ' Uo c7 Uo' U9 (oJ col U T T T o O m rn m m N N N N N N N ..... N N N N N N h i(1 N N N N YO1 m N N N Nm m m m m m m m m m m X o m n r. < 00 a a O O � Q ° m n O m O a� ai v U � S 3 o_ Y c aU m N � E A v v m m W W 0 0 J J �n n I mm¢ L 8$$ °n 6e6B8v &: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > a a n a a a a a n a a a « p N N N N N N N N N N N '12 0 0 0 0'' 0 0 0 5 z m v r m Z v S h z nQ a 35� `m m � -6 *6 r s m s m J�JsssasJJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e $ o a m v m m m v v v m m O O m A m m W m N p �°p' N y L m N N m m N O N IT) NNN Ul co N fn f/l °n M M m °n °n M °n m °n °m °m CI N tNV (NV N N N (NV tNV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N h YO1 N N N N N N N N N HJ m^moo °oo °_ °_m pl o'i f Z Z l N V1 f/1 N (nNN41mN NNm4 S a a « O U I ¢ U o� a� V N °m W v n m z Jn O o m O J .ti U m � N N N N N N _pp E N � N Y 3 4 Y Q Doti n m m n m m �NM 1 N o] Q m to n f1 th M OI N m N N N N N N O O O m N m N pN1 � N N N N m N 4 3 O a °o O N N I Z N II c tLL Z 0 N C J °o ........ 0 ..... ° °rymrymMmMmMNmmm� m�omem�°nm °m m�°o .n i°o ADM m c o g c c c a q a q c y c c q c U U U U U U U U U U U U cJ U U U > > O O - � '! � � F � e- � 7 Im N M M m w Z N N E r a s o a a m m A N N N N N N N m N N m o N x O J —6O O '6 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 Q Q m m U U U U U m O D U m m Y Y Y Y Y Y m Y Y m m m m m m m m m m m m Q1 m m v m o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 o U o 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U a v v v v v v v . v v v v v ry N ry ry N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m o+ rn m rn m ry m m r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N tmV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A V� N Va VI VI N N YI m N c e c e a c a c c c a a c a a a j t$/IN NNNN ($/1 UtINyyN Nl$gNNY # N N N N N m N N N N m m � in m m m m m m m o mmm M o m m m m m o j o y c y o g c a q q c o c c c y q q a q q c c o q c c aaa otiotio6tioodcititiJoUOJootidJotiti uciJ •- V tOV`�i•- 9 @�� 55u355u53�53 "u3939'Sm�u3� u N N >'>'>'>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N N � O J a 3 a o d ❑ n r o a x J ro < N °~ Z U 'o O~ M P o ' S m o m N M< A M— Yrmim 00000-"' ` o 000So'o o'o5o °oay Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Q Q U m 0 6l O] m f0 Ul m y y fD m m m t0 m fL w m m lL m 0] m m m K u m v m v u m a v u w v Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q J J Q Q `o o `o `o o `v `o `o `v o `o `o `o `o `o `o `o `o `o `o o `o `o `o `o v v v m w m u m m m i u m i w m v u m 2 e r 2,22 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z . �... i.. m n ry rn m m m n m ry °' n rn m m ry m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N. N N. N N N N N N N N N N h Yl V� N N h N h h v°i h N h u°i N Y0I u°i N YOi N V� N N h VOi N f NN NN N!/iNNmU1 NNf/1NNm41NmNNN(/1NmU�U1 Nl/)m N d a LL N d m Z go mmn °° °a min vi m°ao Q LL a g a P q a P q y e P P g a y q P tiodtiotitioc�oJbdociooci a O b N� N N N Cml W m O mi f m m O N n 7 � � � .!- V �2 ',� N n n n 'm P W 0 S N D D W � ° S n in x Y Y x Y Y m e Y Y F m �mmmmmm mmm -mm - m o f c c m m�p y m v :o m .a _ Q Q Q J J J J Q J J J Q Q J Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W N R N. N° °A N. W N N W N N N N E E . v v i u v m v v v i u_ m v v m v u N 2 N Ia0 2 N N N N N N 2 N Id0 W N N N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m W m �°n mmm W m M m W m m m m m m m m m m N m m m ry m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P W U U U O N OI W N � N r r o °oo N N r r n °W m M (WV . fO N. N m W. m N m m m N W m 0 m O N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O N N O W m m m W m m m 10 m m 10 10 W m 10 m m 10 g N r n 9 N ffffzfffffffzfiffi� gzta d: x � O N a 76 C LL N Z u 0 0 o o 0 0 c o v^ a a a < r r n `ro °m °m °N, °mm °m orvm"'o Nr°�, Mn D m m W m m W m W W ti ti ti ti ti ti a tipp tiNN ti ti tipp ti ti ff tiqq { N N m m U � W m P D v ry W W W o o y � 0 0 0 o a 0 R 4] Ql 0 0) Q1 Fy N Y y N m Q Q O Q Q Q O O O 00 O O W m W m m m m W m W m m W W W m n n m m n n m w n M n m M n n n IWV N m iO (O W N N N N m N 10 W 10 10 10 10 10 IO N N N N N N N N N h V°1 h N h N N N h h v°i V°i N h u°i N 1 V) � In NNN M N N N N N l/1 41 VI !/1 N N N x x x O N a 76 C LL N Z u 0 Iv n m m r g o m r yny r nyy r r r n 2 g O o a LL .Qm°..moos. d Q a U U U U U U U U U >`n as O O O O O O N �000008S m nMn mMnn in N N N N N N N N N N N V°I N Y� N VI N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4 i b O ml m N J J a a m O q N ❑ a N o � a r o tt M m Q N � v a' Pa N C E � A� J M� N N l"1 N ry N N N 4 N Q U U p m � N > O b � N i hi N m o o o a o❑ o Q J J J J J J J J a a a a a a (L a U m�N� -•gyp -� ~ LW N O N A N m N N N O N O N O O N O O O J a ❑ L ❑ J O J a � a L a Y R a K J o❑ p� J J J T K K m Ary w v m n IO N O W J J J .5 a N N.Y N; N N O N _ (Y v� ti u ti u v v� N Ul fE UI Ul N N d v O O O O O O❑ J IL IL LL LL IL LL BooSEggEo m m m m m m m m m rymm�o �n .nen N N N N N N N N h N h h N N VI u� N 1 N� N N N N N N N N N f f f f w f w NN NIANNNNNo N4 # 3 i 0 0 o m � o to n n ml ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ m m J J J J J J J a a a a a a a U U N O O > > r > u1 �O o a N L ❑ a d N L d K rn a m LL 0880000s g� &rlm m m mm mmmin mmm �rrn non ��n .n �nm m O N N O b O O N tp N O O r N N N N n°Of N O r QggQQ U U U U U " N 0 N q A m tR O 7 � 10 N N v Y a v v w f� F N v � 0 � t 0��50 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m yN yN yN yN N yN JN yN N N N N N yN M N N Vl N N N N N N N M � !D N a l0 LL N a Z N \ kkkkkk) ! ! | k !I | k 2| \ ! C a !!] §, : §a §B§§ ^ ; §! ; ) §)))))) } §) \ J�7 55 � � z ))��`� zz3z:zz � / �))�)))\ 4; \ kkkkkk) ! ! | k !I | k 2| \ ! C a !!] §, : §a §B§§ ^ ; §! ; ) §)))))) } §) \ § §![!\!2§!\t§ 55 ))��`� � §§§ 7 Ono ! \; :m: \ � !!!!!!!!!!! a §§§ 7 Ono ! \; :m: \ � THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 ICIrm REALTY GROUP 30 South Meridian Street, Suite 1100 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 phone: (317) 713 -5659 Fax: (317) 577 -5605 MEMORANDUM TO: Eric Strickland FROM: John Fox DATE: February 19, 2007 RE: Market Support for 951 & 41 We have been closely monitoring the growth and activity at 951 & 41 in southern Collier County. There has been dramatic residential growth and development in this area in recent years. At the end of last year, I hired Mike Timmerman of Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, a local expert in the residential housing market, to gather some of this information for us. A brief review of these findings is as follows: • There are two large residential developments in this area and numerous others in various stages of build -out. Notable are Lely Resort and Fiddlers Creek. Each of these contains plans for development of around 5,000 residential units and each is also nearing the halfway point of their build -out. Hanley Wood was able to clearly document the rapid growth in this area by demonstrating the current counts of housing units in the area far exceed the numbers being reported by conventional demographic sources. For example, Hanley Wood estimates as of late 2006 there were 8,650 housing units within 3 miles of 951/41 whereas our conventional demographic source, Applied Geographic Solutions (AGS), reports a count of 5,018. This same differential is seen at the 5 mile radius. Thus the estimates from conventional demographic sources are likely undercounting this area as their methodology cannot keep up with the rapid growth. • As further documentation of the growth trend taking place here, I examined what has taken place at 1 -75 and Immokalee Rd. over the last two Census periods. In 1990, there were an estimated 7,200 persons living within 3 miles of this intersection. By 2000, the population had almost tripled to about 20,000 persons. For comparison, at 951 /41 there were 6,200 persons within 3 miles in 1990. By 2000 this had nearly doubled to 11,500. In 2006, using the housing information from Hanley Wood, the population is likely around 23,000, having roughly doubled in only 6 years. Clearly 951/41 is showing a very similar pattern to I -75 and Immokalee. However, conventional sources continue to estimated lower numbers than actual housing counts suggest. In short, the 951/41 area has been and is continuing to experience rapid development of new housing stock bringing new residents to the area. The growth pattern is strongly suggestive of what has taken place in the past at I -75 and Immokalee. There is substantial additional lot development potential to support future population growth. Hanley Wood estimates over 12,000 future units will be developed within 3 miles of 951/41. I have attached several documents: • Hanley Wood Map of residential subdivision activity in the immediate vicinity of 951/41. • Hanley Wood Table listing the subdivision activity in detail for each project. • AGS demographic report of 951/41. • AGS demographic report of I -75 & Immokalee Rd. Let me know if you need anything further on this project. R V r ro C W ui �^ a R Z 00000MOCOVOmo r N N J (O O O O n 0 0 0 0 CO ((OO M r N r m o 0 0 0 0 O N LL� O N 0 0 0 0 0 n o N rn�m�nrornovoo�n M M M m M M M M M M M Lu K K K K U C-)F' F'H Q Q Q Iii LL Q ! D mil Q Q Q Q LL N o v O o 0 0 o, oom00000 A � N �p Ol O N N N r 0 0 �p Ol m N M tp N m O O m 0 0 0 N � n m H m N m � N n M a°pD N h M ar 0 0 0 aD M N O O pp N n r m °Ul J Ul > U K �QO d W W > y z M W d K 0 K O w a 0 LLI �a"izg�Q >F` LJ W fa 00 W O} W LL U K co y U m Q U 2Q JQ0wW = m0" 0 00 w w=�zW of F-> K > 7 P 1 K Q� D D > F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- Q D 0 0 0 LL LL Q R R a "¢ vin C in W R — uj u ° Z Z 0 CO Z d w y U} Y °} U W 3 a wmoES:<, J � m Z O Qcc 7 } c o o rn �n o o r o 0 0 o M N N � r v o vvooOCOOm�om. -o N � OJ V 0 0 0 to O O M O O r- O O m t0 c0 OMi r 0 V O O N �� N N of O M m V O M� m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W W WLLI W W W W W W F F rrF F F F- F -r rr Q Q Q Q Q Q LL Q Q Q Q Q Q W S U z W W u) a W Q p > Q U U) t� W N (y1 W W }°¢ LLO�a °Z XW Or J ( Z O O QJ ;��S >NQZOaZ Z w 3 Q w x Z W Z Z Q2j>; -aa�F JQw WQ m>QOc�wwu)Q WOJw Q <m im Im m W LLLLLL U' 0 O O N A i 0 3 d m 2 A D T O LL T � y � a m Z r ^ M � N h �{OOONOM O)O N n v •- �� V !P O n 0 (p 00 Q7 Q OJ N OJ N N O Cp V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ww�wwLUwwwwwwwwwwwwwww aaLLa <�aaaaaQC),0D Qac¢ 0 m r N In w r m w R y w L ¢` a a �a < z a O O w W Q p E y U U' w > z r� -og= °0w °f W ii Jui cnw rnw '00 ow $°Q >m 5g aQZQ g Y w o Y w w- U m > a W >� J} e �gw aa�wo¢1W <0 W mdm m °<a m W3=wcnzcaz W zcriZr= - <W(L � m Qa p Q Q¢% O Q¢¢ X w z¢ ¢ O F-= x z o 5J3immm:EzZZ(Lwwwrnmi- » ->> v O O =N O L N L 0 Q O p 0 L L 0 L 0 O O 'ry N n N L z Z ''c 'd' a Zoe O ] Z O Z) F N J Z m r O m zm~ _ 0 0 0 M M N N i0 0 3 co O w o w u m v V r o h' : N v w d cyi M M 1I1 OD IO V Of r (O N In w r m w R y w L ¢` a a �a < z a O O w W Q p E y U U' w > z r� -og= °0w °f W ii Jui cnw rnw '00 ow $°Q >m 5g aQZQ g Y w o Y w w- U m > a W >� J} e �gw aa�wo¢1W <0 W mdm m °<a m W3=wcnzcaz W zcriZr= - <W(L � m Qa p Q Q¢% O Q¢¢ X w z¢ ¢ O F-= x z o 5J3immm:EzZZ(Lwwwrnmi- » ->> v O O =N O L N L 0 Q O p 0 L L 0 L 0 O O 'ry N n N L z Z ''c 'd' a Zoe O ] Z O Z) F N J Z m r O m zm~ _ 0 0 0 M M N N i0 0 3 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates 6 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups Prepared For K %TE REALTY CPOUP Lat/Lon: 26.272961-81.74299 February 2007 RF5 Immolkalee Rd 1.00 mi radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius Population Estimated Population (2006) 2,802 33,882 91,212 Census Population (1990) 649 7,246 29,745 Census Population (2000) 1,763 20,248 63,984 Projected Population (2011) 3,616 43,530 111,927 Forecasted Population (2016) 4,334 53,447 133,712 Historical Annual Growth (1990 to 2000) 1,114 17.2°/ 13,002 17.9% 34,239 11.5% Historical Annual Growth (2000 to 2006) 1,039 9,8% 13,634 11.2% 27,228 7.1% Projected Annual Growth (2006 to 2011) 815 5.8% 9,648 5.7% 20,716 4.5% Est. Population Density (2006) 892.31 psm 1,199.08 psm 1,171.42 psm Trade Area Size 3.14 sq mi 28.26 sq mi 77.86 sq mi Households Estimated Households (2006) 1,053 13,458 37,184 Census Households (1990) 236 2,682 11,960 Census Households (2000) 685 8,541 27,595 Projected Households (2011) 1,302 16,449 43,597 Forecasted Households (2016) 1,789 23,131 58,794 Households with Children (2006) 323 30.7% 3,395 25.2% 8,572 23.1% Average Household Size (2006) 2.66 2.50 2.43 Average Household Income Est. Average Household Income (2006) $100,802 $102,700 $98,021 Proj. Average Household Income (2011) $110,460 $111,234 $106,515 Average Family Income (2006) $110,534 $114,321 $112,741 Median Household Income Est. Median Household Income (2006) $78,242 $73,381 $67,707 Prot. Median Household Income (2011) $85,414 $79,946 $74,226 Median Family Income (2006) $86,997 $83,528 $79,641 Per Capita Income Est. Per Capita Income (2006) $37,894 $41,244 $40,401 Pool. Per Capita Income (2011) $39,768 $42,406 $41,871 Per Capita Income Est. 5 year change $1,875 4.9% $1,162 2.8% $1,470 16% Other Income Est. Median Disposable Income (2006) $62,867 $59,510 $55,253 Est. Median Disposable Income (2011) $67,538 $63,874 $59,823 Disposable Income Est. 5 year change $4,671 7.4% $4,364 7.3% $4,570 81% Est. Median Household Net Worth (2006) $57,519 $57,426 $54,118 Daytime Demos Total Number of Businesses (2006) 93 1,268 5,230 Total Number of Employees (2006) 711 9,338 41,780 Company Headqtrs: Businesses (2006) 0 0 2 0.1% 7 0.1% Company Headgtrs: Employees (2006) 0 0 15 0.2% 468 11% Unemployment Rate (2006) 1.50% 1.50% 1.60% Employee Population per Business 7.6 to 1 7.4 to 1 8.0 to 1 Residential Population per Business 30.0 to 1 26.7 to 1 17.4 to 1 ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Ancona, 480- 491 -1112 - 1 Of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions /TIGER Geography 07/06 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates & 2011 Projections gr Calculated using Proportional Block Groups K %?'E Prepared For REALTY GROUP Lat/Lon: 26.27296/- 81.74299 February 2007 RF5 Immokalee Rd 1.00 mi radius 3.00 mi radius 11 mi radius Race & Ethnicity White (2006) 2,667 95.2% 32,401 95.6% 85,555 93.8% Black or African American (2006) 45 1.6e% 417 1.2% 1,406 1.5% American Indian & Alaska Native (2006) 3 0.1% 35 0.1% 99 01e% Asian (2006) 24 0.9% 343 1.0% 940 1.0% Hawiian & Pacific Islander (2006) 1 0.0% 6 0.0% 33 0.0% Other Race (2006) 26 0.9% 323 1.0% 1,966 2, 2°% Two or More Races (2006) 35 1.2% 358 1.1% 1,213 1.3°% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2006) 2,515 89.8% 30,689 90.6% 78,193 85,7% Hispanic or Latino Population (2006) 286 10.2% 3,194 9.4°% 13,019 14.3% Not of Hispanic Origin Population (1990) 612 94.4% 6,755 93.2% 27,671 93.0°% Hispanic Origin Population (1990) 36 5.6e% 492 6.8% 2,075 7.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,671 94.8% 19,395 95.8% 57,668 90.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 92 5.2% 853 4.2% 6,316 9.9°% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2011) 3,103 85,8% 37,646 86.5% 92,214 82.4% Hispanic or Latino Population (2011) 513 14.2% 5,885 13.5% 19,713 17.6°% Hist. Hispanic Ann Growth (1990 to 2006) 250 43.2% 2,702 34.3% 10,944 33.0% Proj. Hispanic Ann Growth (2006 to 2011) 227 15.8% 2,691 16.8% 6,694 10.3% Age Distribution Age 0 to 4 yrs (2006) 179 6.4% 1,842 5.4% 4,813 53°% Age 5 to 9 yrs (2006) 190 6.8% 1,993 5.9°% 4,959 5.4% Age 10 to 14 yrs (2006) 203 7.2% 2,098 61e% 5,198 5.7% Age 15 to 19 yrs (2006) 166 5.9% 1,679 5.0% 4,510 4.9% Age 20 to 24 yrs (2006) 88 3.1% 996 2.9% 3,725 4.1% Age 25 to 29 yrs (2006) 109 3.9% 1,225 3.6% 3,974 4.4°% Age 30 to 34 yrs (2006) 133 4.7% 1,523 4.5% 4,497 4.9°% Age 35 to 39 yrs (2006) 193 6.9% 2,037 6.0°% 5,409 5.9% Age 40 to 44 yrs (2006) 235 8.4% 2,479 7.3% 6,199 6.8°% Age 45 to 49 yrs (2006) 245 8.7% 2,642 7.8°% 6,482 7.1% Age 50 to 54 yrs (2006) 198 71% 2,381 7.0% 6,045 6.6% Age 55 to 59 yrs (2006) 168 6.0% 2,419 7.1% 5,959 6.5% Age 60 to 64 yrs (2006) 176 6.3°% 2,457 7.3°% 6,161 6.8% Age 65 to 74 yrs (2006) 314 11.2% 4,478 13.2% 12,054 13.2°% Age 75 to 84 yrs (2006) 171 6.1°% 2,782 8.2°% 8,270 9.1% Age 85 yrs plus (2006) 35 13e% 850 2.5% 2,957 3.2°% Median Age (2006) 43.1 yrs 46.8 yrs 46.5 yrs Gender Age Distribution Female Population (2006) 1,433 51.1°% 17,485 51.6% 46,400 50.9°% Age 0 to 19 yrs (2006) 363 25.3% 3,763 215% 9,615 20.7% Age 20 to 64 yrs (2006) 797 55.6% 9,508 54.4% 24,547 52.9% Age 65 yrs plus (2006) 273 19.1% 4,213 241% 12,239 264°% Female Median Age (2006) 43.2 yrs 47.3 yrs 47.6 yrs Male Population (2006) 1,369 48.9% 16,398 48.4% 44,811 49.1% Age 0 to 19 yrs (2006) 375 27.4°% 3,850 23.5% 9,864 22.0°% Age 20 to 64 yrs (2006) 747 54.6% 8,650 52.8% 23,905 53.3°% Age 65 yrs plus (2006) 247 18.0°% 3,898 23.8% 11,042 24.6% Male Median Age (2006) 42.9 yrs 46.2 yrs 45.4 yrs 92007, Sites USA, Chandler, Anwria, 480- 491 -1112 - 2 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07106 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates & 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups Prepared For K /TE REALTY GROUP Lat/Lon: 26.27296/ - 81.74299 February 2007 RF5 ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 3 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07M6 11 mi radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius 1-75 & Immokalee Rd Household Income Distribution HH Income $200,000 or More (2006) 101 9.6% 1,421 10.6% 3,724 10.0% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 (2006) 80 7.6% 829 6.2% 1,948 5.2% HH Income $100,000 to $149,999 (2006) 203 19.3% 2,293 17.0% 5,250 14.1% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 (2006) 165 157% 1,896 14 -1 % 4,656 12.5% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 (2006) 179 17,0°% 2,650 19.7 % 7,475 20.1% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 (2006) 124 11.8% 1,722 12.8% 5,342 14.4°% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 (2006) 87 8.3% 1,045 7.8% 3,508 9.4% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 (2006) 57 5.4% 854 6.3% 2,920 T9°% HH Income $0 to $14,999 (2006) 57 5,4% 749 5.6% 2,361 6.3% HH Income $35,000+ (2006) 852 80.9% 10,810 80.3°% 28,395 76.4°% HH Income $75,000+ (2006) 549 52.2°% 6,439 47.8°% 15,578 41.9% Housing Total Housing Units (2006) 1,401 19,769 55,507 Housing Units, Occupied (2006) 1,053 75.2% 13,458 68.1% 37,184 67.0°% Housing Units, Owner - Occupied (2006) 875 83.1% 11,467 85,2% 29,401 79.1% Housing Units, Renter - Occupied (2006) 178 169 °% 1,990 14.8% 7,783 20.9% Housing Units, Vacant (2006) 347 24.8% 6,311 31.9% 18,324 33.0% Median Years in Residence (2006) 3.5 yrs 2.9 yrs 2.8 yrs Marital Status Never Married (2006) 287 13.8°% 3,109 11.7% 10,529 14.3% Now Married (2006) 1,497 72.0°% 18,708 70.6% 47,751 65.0% Separated (2006) 39 1.9% 504 1.9% 2,512 3.4% Widowed (2006) 90 4.3°% 1,795 6.8°% 5,476 7.5% Divorced (2006) 166 8.0% 2,386 9.0% 7,207 9.8% Household Type Population Family (2006) 2,469 88.1% 29,240 86.3% 75,474 82.7% Population Non- Family(2006) 332 11.9% 4,403 13.0% 14,727 16.1% Population Group Qtrs(2006) 0 0.0% 240 0.7% 1,011 1.1% Family Households (2006) 793 753% 9,929 73.8°% 25,857 69.5°% Married Couple With Children (2006) 252 16.9% 2,622 14.0% 6,271 13.1% Average Family Household Size (2006) 3.11 2.94 2.92 Non - Family Households (2006) 260 243% 3,528 26.2°% 11,327 30.5°% Household Size 1 Person Household (2006) 183 17.4% 2,549 18.9% 8,310 22.3% 2 Person Households (2006) 431 40,9% 6,093 453°% 16,681 44.9% 3 Person Households (2006) 143 13.6% 1,694 12.6°% 4,346 11.7% 4 Person Households (2006) 192 18.2°% 2,129 15.8°% 5,029 13.5% 5 Person Households (2006) 82 7.8% 783 5.8% 2,057 5.5% 6+ Person Households (2006) 22 21% 210 1.6°% 761 2.0% Household Vehicles Total Vehicles Available (2006) 2,034 24,255 63,636 Household: 0 Vehicles Available (2006) 20 1.9% 332 2.5% 1,302 3.5% Household: 1 Vehicles Available (2006) 325 30.9% 4,668 34.7% 14,595 39.3% Household: 2+ Vehicles Available (2006) 708 67.2°% 8,458 62.8°% 21,287 57.2°% Average Vehicles Per Household (2006) 1.9 1.8 1.7 ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 3 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07M6 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED g 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates & 2011 Projections - Calculated using Proportional Block Groups K%T F Prepared For REALTY cacVP Lat/Lon:26.27296 /- 81.74299 February 2007 RF5 1.75 & Immokalee Rd 1.00 mi radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius Labor Force Est, Labor: Population Age 16 +(2006) 2,189 27,543 75,250 Est. Civilian Employed (2006) 1,228 56.1% 13,587 49.3% 37,625 50.0°% Est. Civilian Unemployed (2006) 33 1,5% 423 1.5°% 1,193 1.6% Est. in Armed Forces (2006) 0 0 0 Est. not in Labor Force (2006) 928 42.4% 13,533 49.1% 36,432 48.4°% Occupation Occupation: Population Age 16+ (2000) 822 8,523 27,409 Mgmt, Business, & Financial Operations (20C 158 19.2°% 1,700 19.9% 4,491 16.4°% Professional and Related (2000) 168 20.4% 1,911 22.4% 4,860 17.7° Service (2000) 134 Ill 1,259 14.8% 4,847 17.7% Sales and Office (2000) 257 313% 2,726 32.0% 8,549 31.2°% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry (2000) 1 0.1% 13 0.1°% 348 1.3% Construct, Extraction, & Maintenance (2000) 60 7.3% 477 5.6% 2,670 9.7% Production, Transp. & Material Moving (2000 43 5.3°% 438 5.1% 1,644 6.0% Percent White Collar Workers (2000) 71.0% 74.3% 65.3% Percent Blue Collar Workers (2000) 29.0% 25.7% 34, 7% Consumer Expenditure (in $,000,000s) Total Household Expenditure (2006) $75 $971 $2,574 Total Non - Retail Expenditures (2006) $42 56.6% $549 56.5% $1,453 56.5% Total Retail Expenditures (2006) $33 43.4% $422 43.5% $1,121 43.5% Apparel (2006) $1 1.5% $14 1.5% $38 1.5% Contributions (2006) $3 4.3% $42 4.3 °% $111 4.3% Education (2006) $2 2.1 °% $26 2.7% $69 2.7% Entertainment (2006) $4 5.9% $57 5.9% $150 5.8% Food And Beverages (2006) $12 15.4% $150 15.4% $398 15.5% Furnishings And Equipment (2006) $4 4.7 °% $46 4.7% $120 4.7% Gifts (2006) $2 3.0% $29 3.0% $76 3.0% Health Care (2006) $4 58% $57 5.8% $151 5.9% Household Operations (2006) $3 4.0% $38 4.0% $101 3.9% Miscellaneous Expenses (2006) $1 1.7% $16 17% $43 1.19/ Personal Care (2006) $1 1.5% $14 1.5% $38 1.5% Personal Insurance (2006) $1 1.2% $11 1.1% $29 1. 1% Reading (2006) $0 $3 03% $9 03% Shelter (2006) $15 20.2% $195 20.1% $518 20.1% Tobacco(2006) $0 $6 0,6% $16 0.6% Transportation (2006) $15 20.3% $197 20.3% $522 20.3% Utilities (2006) $5 6.8% $66 6.8% $177 6.9% Educational Attainment Adult Population (25 Years or Older) (2006) 1,976 25,273 68,007 Elementary (0 to 8) (2006) 36 1,8% 449 1,8% 2,230 3.3% Some High School (9 to 11) (2006) 114 5.8°% 1,223 4.8% 3,820 5.6% High School Graduate (12) (2006) 461 23.3% 5,301 21.0°% 15,585 229% Some College (13 to 16) (2006) 429 21.7% 5,962 23.6°% 15,782 23.2% Associate Degree Only (2006) 153 7.8% 1,679 6.6°% 4,459 6.6°% Bachelor Degree Only (2006) 494 25.0% 6,618 26.2% 16,515 243% Graduate Degree (2006) 289 14.6% 4,041 16.0°% 9,615 14.1% @2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Anzona, 480- 491 -1112 - 4 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 01106 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates & 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups Prepared For KITE Rcd LiY GROb'P Lat/Lon: 26.27296 1- 81.74299 February 2007 RF5 Immokalee R• 1.00 mi radius II bill radius 5.00 mi radius UnitMn structure 505 62 5,659 0 5% 16,515 44.0% 1 Detached Unit (2000) 6 .4% 8.2% 1,140 102 . 3,064 8.2% 1 Attached Unit (2000) 56 5 6.9% 1,062 9.55% °/ 3,857 10.3% 2 to 4 Units (2000) 120 14.9% 1,977 17.7% 5,354 14.3% 5 to 9 Units (2000) 5 0.7% 698 6.2% 2,895 7.7% 10 to 19 Units (2000) 44 5.5% 423 3.8°/ 1,997 5. 20 to 49 Units (2000) 8 10 132 1.2% 1,739 6% 4.6 °/p 50 or more Units (2000) 5 0.6% 107 1.0% 2,063 5.5% Mobile Home or Trailer (2000) 0 19 0.0% Other Structure (2000) 0 Homes Built By Year 149 18.4% 2,092 18.7% 4,352 11.6% Homes Built 1999 to 2000 196 24.2% 3,328 29.7% 9,534 25.4° Homes Built 1995 to 1998 207 25.5% 2,376 21.2% 7,935 21.2% Homes Built 1990 to 1994 204 25.2% 2,475 221% 9,660 25.8% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 48 5.9% 803 7.2% 4,188 11.2% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 5 0.6% 79 0.7% 1,200 12% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 0 20 0.2% 483 1.3% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 1 0.2% 23 0.2% 149 0.4% Homes Built Before 1949 Home Values Home Values $1,000,000 or More (2000) 12 2.6% 96 1.8% 359 2.5% Home Values $500,000 to $999,999 (2000) 41 9.1% 411 7.8% 1,108 7.8% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 (2000) 28 6.2% 307 5.9% 784 5.5% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 (2000) 51 11.3 % 760 14.5% 1,582 11.1% Home Values $200,000 to $299,999 (2000) 129 28.6% 1,439 27.4% 3,384 23.7% Home Values $150,000 to $199,999 (2000) 109 242p/ 1,396 26.6% 3,192 22.3% Home Values $100,000 to $149,999 (2000) 65 14.4% 663 12.6% 2,676 18.7% Home Values $70,000 to $99,999 (2000) 14 10% 135 2.6% 884 6.2% Home Values $50,000 to $69,999 (2000) 3 0.6% 30 0.6% 170 Home Values $25,000 to $49,999 (2000) 0 8 0.2% 96 0. 0.7 7°/a % Home Values $0 to $24,999 (2000) 0 7 0.1% 55 0.4% Owner Occupied Median Home Value (2000) $239,028 $233,987 $235,951 Renter Occupied Median Rent (2000) $1,035 $1,060 $923 Transportation To Work 679 82.6% 7,167 84.1% 21,650 79.0% Drive to Work Alone (2000) 60 73°/ 648 Z6°/ 3,073 11.2% Drive to Work in Carpool (2000) 1 0.0°/ 220 0.8% Travel to Work - Public Transportation (2000; 0 Drive to Work on Motorcycle (2000) 1 0.1% 13 0.1% 74 03% Walk or Bicycle to Work (2000) 8 1.0% 85 1.0% 563 2.1°% Other Means (2000) 13 1.6% 110 13% 289 1.1% Work at Home (2000) 61 7.4% 500 5.9% 1,539 5.6% Travel Time Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less (2000) 157 20.7 % 1,752 21.8% 6,953 26.9% Travel to Work in 14 to 29 Minutes (2000) 377 49.6% 4,215 52.5% 12,372 47.8% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes (2000) 201 26.4% 1,801 22.4 % 5,702 22.0% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More (2000) 26 14% 255 3.2% 842 3.3% Average Travel Time to Work (2000) 21.3 mins 21.2 rains 21.0 mins 02001. Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480 - 491 -0112 - 5 of 5- Demographic Source Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07105 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates 8 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups K%7'6 REALTY GROUP LatlLon:26.063461- 81.69917 February 2007 RF5 ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 1 Of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07 /06 11 mi radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius Population Estimated Population (2006) 1,563 14,382 34,034 Census Population (1990) 954 6,273 17,389 1 Census Population (2000) 1,302 11,520 27,747 Projected Population (2011) 1,794 16,903 39,326 Forecasted Population (2016) 1,887 18,678 41,468 Historical Annual Growth (1990 to 2000) 348 3.7% 5,248 8.4% 10,358 6.0% Historical Annual Growth (2000 to 2006) 260 33% 2,862 4.1% 6,287 3.8% Projected Annual Growth (2006 to 2011) 232 3.0% 2,521 3.5% 5,292 3.1% Est. Population Density (2006) 509.66 psm 518.80 psm 462.66 psm Trade Area Size 3.07 sq mi 27.72 sq mi 73.56 sq mi Households Estimated Households (2006) .. 480 2,341 MAW 7,395 Census Households (1990) 684 4,267 12,041 Census Households (2000) 816 5,620 15,016 Projected Households (2011) 984 7,102 18,124 Forecasted Households (2016) 73 91% 1,306 26.0% 2,576 18.7% Households with Children (2006) 2.85 2.45 Average Household Size (2006) 2.07 Average Household Income $44,402 $58,862 $64,557 Est, Average Household Income (2006) Proj. Average Household Income (2011) $49,288 $63,807 $70,298 Average Family Income (2006) $50,568 $65,566 $74,155 Median Household Income $38,660 $46,104 $47,418 Est. Median Household Income (2006) $42,252 $50,345 $51,837 Proj. Median Household Income (2011) Median Family Income (2006) $44,107 $51,035 $56,224 Per Capita Income Est. Per Capita Income (2006) $21,527 $20,983 $26,980 Proj. Per Capita Income (2011) $22,456 $21,620 $27,690 Per Capita Income Est. 5 year change $929 4.3°% $638 3.0% $710 2.6% Other Income Est. Median Disposable Income (2006) $33,597 $39,351 $40,483 Est. Median Disposable Income (2011) $36,542 $42,575 $43,784 Disposable Income Est. 5 year change $2,945 8.8% $3,224 8.2% $3,301 8.2% Est. Median Household Net Worth (2006) $43,627 $41,889 $46,270 Daytime Demos 31 262 719 Total Number of Businesses (2006) Total Number of Employees (2006) 374 3,322 6,406 Company Headqtrs: Businesses (2006) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Company Headgtrs: Employees (2006) 0 0 2.60°/ 0 0 2.80% 2.40% Unemployment Rate (2006) 11.9 to 1 12.7 to 1 8.9 to 1 Employee Population per Business 49.9 to 1 54.8 to 1 47.4 to 1 Residential Population per Business ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 1 Of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07 /06 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates & 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups K /T6 REALTY GROUP Lat/Lon: 26.063461- 81.69917 February 2007 RFS ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 2 of 5 - Demographic Source: APPlied Geographic Solutions ITIGER Geography 07N8 1.00 m! radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius Race & Ethnicity 1,443 92.3% 10,732 74.6% 28,523 83.8% White (2006) 35 2.2% 1,292 9.0% 2,060 6.1% € Black or African American (2006) 2 0.1% 28 0.2% 66 0.2 % American Indian & Alaska Native (2006) 6 0.4% 81 0.6°% 222 0.7% Asian (2006) 0 7 0.0°% 17 01% ' Hawiian & Pacific Islander (2006) 48 3.1% 1,840 12.8% 2,351 6.9% Other Race (2006) 28 1.8°% 402 2.8°% 795 2.3% Two or More Races (2006) Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2006) 1,300 83.2% 7,991 55.6% 24,224 71.2°% Hispanic or Latino Population (2006) 263 16.8°% 6,391 44.4% 9,810 28.8% Not of Hispanic Origin Population (1990) 929 97.4% 4,852 77.3% 15,306 88.0% ' Hispanic Origin Population (1990) 25 2.6% 1,421 22.7°% 2,083 12.0°% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,167 89.6% 7,203 62.5% 21,593 77.8°% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 135 10.4°% 4,317 37.5°% 6,154 22.2% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2011) 1,417 79.0% 9,060 53.6% 26,700 67.9°% Hispanic or Latino Population (2011) 377 21.0°% 7,843 46.4°% 12,627 321% Hist. Hispanic Ann Growth (1990 to 2006) 238 58.9% 4,970 21.9°% 7,727 23.2% Pool. Hispanic Ann Growth (2006 to 2011) 114 8.7% 1,453 4.5% 2,817 5.7% Age Distribution 59 3.8% 1,043 7.2% 1,933 5.7°% Age 0 to 4 yrs (2006) 37 2.4°% 858 6.0% 1,578 4.6% Age 5 to 9 yrs (2006) 39 2.5% 778 5.4% 1,469 4.3% Age 10 to 14 yrs (2006) 40 2.6°% 924 6.4% 1,637 4.8°% Age 15 to 19 yrs (2006) 68 4.4% 1,333 9.3% 2,174 6.4% Age 20 to 24 yrs (2006) 65 4.2% 1,071 7.4% 1,904 5.6% Age 25 to 29 yrs (2006) Age 30 to 34 yrs (2006) 53 3.4% 891 6.2% 1,759 5.2% Age 35 to 39 yrs (2006) 49 3.1°% 740 5.1% 1,632 4.8°% Age 40 to 44 yrs (2006) 68 4.3°% 791 5.5% 1,708 5.0% Age 45 to 49 yrs (2006) 63 4.0% 701 4.9°% 1,741 5.1% Age 50 to 54 yrs (2006) 81 5.2% 667 4.6% 1,776 5.2% Age 55 to 59 yrs (2006) 108 6.9% 656 4.6% 1,870 5.5% Age 60 to 64 yrs (2006) 150 9.6% 831 5.8% 2,338 6.9% Age 65 to 74 yrs (2006) 328 21.0% 1,557 10.8% 5,002 14.7°% Age 75 to 84 yrs (2006) 263 16.8% 1,138 7.9% 4,127 12.1% Age 85 yrs plus (2006) 91 5.9°% 406 2.8°% 1,387 4.1% Median Age (2006) 58.4 yrs 39.6 yrs 47.5 yrs Gender Age Distribution Female Population (2006) 775 49.6% 6,754 47.0°% 16,741 49.2% Age 0 to 19 yrs (2006) 83 10.7% 1,730 25.6% 3,181 19.0% Age 20 to 64 yrs (2006) 337 43.5% 3,417 50.6% 8,014 47.9°% Age 65 yrs plus (2006) 354 45.7% 1,608 23.8% 5,546 33.1% Female Median Age (2006) 59.8 yrs 41.4 yrs 49.7 yrs Male Population (2006) 788 50,4% 7,628 53.0% 17,293 50.8% Age 0 to 19 yrs (2006) 93 11.8°% 1,872 24.5% 3,435 19.9% Age 20 to 64 yrs (2006) 367 46.6% 4,262 55.9°% 8,888 51.4°% Age 65 yrs plus (2006) 328 41.6°% 1,493 19.6% 4,970 28.7% Male Median Age (2006) 56.7 yrs 38.0 yrs 45.5 yrs ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 2 of 5 - Demographic Source: APPlied Geographic Solutions ITIGER Geography 07N8 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates 8 2011 Projections / Calculated using Proportional Block Groups K /T6 REALTY GROUP LatlLon: 26.06346/-81.69917 February 2007 RFS 02007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 3 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions /TIGER Geography 07/ II mi radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius Household Income Distribution 12 1.6% 158 3.2% 541 3.9% HH Income $200,000 or More (2006) 10 1.3 °/p 110 2.2 °/p 379 2.8 °/p HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 (2006) 341 6.8% 1,174 8.5% HH Income $100,000 to $149,999 (2006) 19 2.6% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 (2006) 68 9.0% 562 11.2% 1,567 11.4% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 (2006) 125 16.6% 1,063 21.2% 2,750 20.0% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 (2006) 151 20.0% 807 16.1% 2,310 16.8% 1 HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 (2006) 140 18.5% 671 13.4% 1,985 14.4% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 (2006) 127 16.8 ° /p 732 14.6 % 1,748 12.7° HH Income $0 to $14,999 (2006) 104 13.7 % 575 11.4% 1,284 9.3% HH Income $35,000+ (2006) 386 51.0% 3,040 60.6% 8,722 63.5% ° HH Income $75,000+ (2006) 110 14.5 ° /p 1,170 23.3%p 3,662 26.7 /p Housing Total Housing Units (2006) 1,362 8,391 22,178 Housing Units, Occupied (2006) 756 55.5% 5,018 59.8% 13,739 62.0% Housing Units, Owner - Occupied (2006) 625 826% 3,504 69.8% 10,481 76.3% Housing Units, Renter - Occupied (2006) 132 17.4% 1,514 30.2% 3,258 23.7% Housing Units, Vacant (2006) 606 44.5% 3,373 40.2% 8,438 38.0% Median Years in Residence (2006) 17 yrs 3.0 yrs 3.3 yrs Marital Status 103 7.6 %p 2,493 22.3 % 4,339 15.8%p Never Married (2006) 917 67.6% 6,070 54.3 % 15,978 58.4% Now Married (2006) 47 3.5% 965 8.6% 1,732 6.3% Separated (2006) 156 11.5% 796 7.1% 2,529 9.2% Widowed (2006) 133 9.8% 854 T6% 2,803 10.2% Divorced (2006) Household Type 1,197 76.6% 11,537 80.2% 26,767 78.6% Population Family (2006) 365 23.3% 2,769 19.3% 6,905 20.3% Population Non - Family (2006) 1 0.1% 76 0.5% 362 11% Population Group Qtrs (2006) Family Households (2006) 468 61.9% 3,477 69.3 % 9,076 661% Married Couple With Children (2006) 44 4.8% 851 14.0% 1,654 10.4° Average Family Household Size (2006) 2.56 3.32 2.95 Non - Family Households (2006) 288 381% 1,541 30.7% 4,664 33.9% Household Size 219 29.0% 1,057 21.1% 3,423 24.9% 1 Person Household (2006) 396 52.4% 2,034 40.5% 6,296 45.8% 2 Person Households (2006) 54 7.1% 490 9.8% 1,264 9.2% 3 Person Households (2006) 52 6.9% 636 12.7% 1,387 101% 4 Person Households (2006) 25 3.2% 397 7.9% 766 5.6% 5 Person Households (2006) 11 1.5% 405 8.1% 603 4.4% 6+ Person Households (2006) Household Vehicles 1,042 8,186 21,759 Total Vehicles Available (2006) 18 2.3% 269 5.4% 638 4.6% Household: 0 Vehicles Available (2006) Household: 1 Vehicles Available (2006) 478 63.3% 2,394 47.7% 6,583 47.9% Household: 2+ Vehicles Available (2006) 260 34.4% 2,355 46.9% 6,519 47.4% Average Vehicles Per Household (2006) 1.4 1.6 1.6 02007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 3 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions /TIGER Geography 07/ DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 census, 2006 Estimates & 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups K%'T/LE REALTY GROUP LatlLon: 26.06346/- 81.69917 February 2007 RF5 11 mi radius 3 3.00 m mi radius 5 5.00 m mi radius Labor Force 1,416 1 11,541 2 28,753 Est. Labor: Population Age 16+ (2006) 1 437 3 30.9% 5 5,732 4 49.7% 1 13,220 4 46.0% Est. Civilian Employed (2006) 4 37 2 2.6 320 2 2.8 701 2 2.4% Est. Civilian Unemployed (2006) ° 0 1 17 0 0.1% 1 17 0 0.1% a Est. in Armed Forces (2006) 0 942 6 66.5% 5 5,473 4 47.4% 1 14,815 5 51.5% o Est. not in Labor Force (2006) 9 `a Occupation 3 342 4 4,554 1 10,737 9.7%a 5 Mgmt, Business, & Financial Operations (20C 1 11 3 3.2% 2 247 5 5.4% 1 1,142 1 5 Professional and Related (2000) 4 90 2 26.3% 1 1,386 3 30.4% 2 2,705 2 % Service (2000) 9 100 2 29.2/° 1 1,075 2 23.6% 3 3,035 2 28.3% Sales and Office (2000) 0 1 0 0.2 30 0 0.7% 9 94 0.9% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry (2000) ° 35 1 10.4% 8 899 1 19.7% 1 1,660 1 15.5% m Construct, Extraction, & Maintenance (2000) 3 60 1 17.5 ° / 5 568 1 12.5% 1 1,055 9 9.8 °/a Production, Tra & Material Moving (2000: 6 02007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480- 491 -1112 - 4 of 5 - Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions I TIGER Geography 07106 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE EXPANDED 1990 - 2000 Census, 2006 Estimates 8 2011 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups KITE REALTY GROUP LattLon:26.063461- 81.69917 February 2007 RF5 51 &41 11 mi radius 3.00 mi radius 5.00 mi radius Units In Structure 172 15.2% 1,833 28.4% 4,964 28.5% 1 Detached Unit (2000) 35 3.2% 360 5.6% 1,286 7.4% 1 Attached Unit (2000) 37 3.3% 575 8.9% 1,452 F 8.3% 2 to 4 Units (2000) 32 2.8% 511 7.9% 1,675 9.6% 5 to 9 Units (2000) 40 3.6 °/p 411 6.4 % 1,997 11.5° 10 to 19 Units (2000) 17 1.5% 248 3.8% 1,415 8.1% . 20 to 49 Units (2000) 0 122 1.9% 635 3.6% 50 or more Units (2000) 752 66.8% 2,039 31.6% 3,487 20.0% Mobile Home or Trailer (2000) 41 3.6% 358 5.5°% 487 2.8% Other Structure (2000) Homes Built By Year 64 5.7% 451 7.0% 807 4.6°% " Homes Built 1999 to 2000 130 11.5% 1,276 19.8% 2,888 16.6% Homes Built 1995 to 1998 117 10.4°% 932 14.4% 2,806 16.1% Homes Built 1990 to 1994 365 32.4% 2,098 32.5% 6,164 35.4% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 329 29.2% 1,203 18.6% 3,593 20.7% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 73 6.5% 314 4.9°% 744 4.3°% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 17 1.5°% 73 1.1% 236 1.4% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 32 2.8% 108 1.7% 158 0.9% Homes Built Before 1949 Home Values 0 3 02% 18 0.4% Home Values $1,000,000 or More (2000) Home Values $500,000 to $999,999 (2000) 6 5.9% 31 2.2% 90 2.1% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 (2000) 6 5.5°% 50 3.6°% 138 3.2°% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 (2000) 6 5.4°% 58 4.2% 214 5.0% Home Values $200,000 to $299,999 (2000) 11 9.9% 115 8.3% 672 15.6% Home Values $150,000 to $199,999 (2000) 6 5.8% 75 5.4% 572 13.3°% Home Values $100,000 to $149,999 (2000) 28 26.0°% 238 17.1°% 1,201 27.9% Home Values $70,000 to $99,999 (2000) 30 27.8% 601 43.3% 1,076 25.0% Home Values $50,000 to $69,999 (2000) 5 4.2% 174 12.6% 253 5.9% Home Values $25,000 to $49,999 (2000) 6 5.2% 36 2.6% 66 1.5% Home Values $0 to $24,999 (2000) 5 4.2°% 8 0.6% 8 0.2% Owner Occupied Median Home Value (2000) $131,591 $118,091 $141,960 Renter Occupied Median Rent (2000) $635 $704 $742 Transportation To Work Drive to Work Alone (2000) 307 90.0% 3,538 77.5°% 8,464 78.7% Drive to Work in Carpool (2000) 17 4.9% 781 17.1% 1,585 14.7°% Travel to Work - Public Transportation (2000' 7 2.0°% 34 0.8°% 82 0.8% Drive to Work on Motorcycle (2000) 0 5 0.1% 30 0.3% Walk or Bicycle to Work (2000) 5 1.5% 108 2.4% 192 1.8% Other Means (2000) 0 60 1.3% 134 1.2% Work at Home (2000) 5 1.6% 40 0.9% 263 2.4°% Travel Time Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less (2000) 99 29.5°% 945 20.9% 2,606 24.8°% Travel to Work in 14 to 29 Minutes (2000) 166 49.2% 2,123 46.9°% 4,581 437% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes (2000) 64 18.9% 1,333 29.4% 2,960 28.2% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More (2000) 8 2.4°% 127 2.8% 340 32% Average Travel Time to Work (2000) 19.0 mins 22.3 mins 22.1 mins ©2007, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480491 -1112 -5o(5- Demographic Source, Applied Geographic Sections ITIGER Geography 07106 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EXHIBIT V.E.I. and EXHIBIT V.E.3 PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The subject small scale comprehensive plan amendment proposes the addition of 7.3t acres to Mixed Use Activity Center #18. The subject acreage is also part of a companion application for rezoning of the Tamiami Crossings CPUD. A commercial area of 235, 000 square feet is requested for the CPUD application. When this coverage is prorated for the 7.3 acre parcel which is the subject of the small scale comprehensive plan amendment, it results in approximately 70,000 square feet of commercial use associated with this request. It is expected that this project will commence development by 2008 with anticipated buildout in 2010. Potable Water: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Potable Water established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Potable Water are as follows: Potable Water LOS Standard 185 GPD /Capita Available Inventory as of FY2007 41.00 MGD Required Inventory as of FY2011 54.99 MGD Planned CIE FY 07 -11 29.75 MGD 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 15.76 MGD Minimum standards for Potable Water are being met or exceeded. It is estimated that potable water demand for the project will be 35,250 GPD. This demand will not have a significant impact on the Regional Water System. Sanitary Sewer: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Sanitary Sewer are as follows: G.\PRoi - PLANNWG DOCS\KrrE951PLN- TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD \GMPA( CPSS - 2006- 1)\APPLICATION\LOSDOC.d. KITE951PI11 Sanitary Sewer LOS Standard 145 GPD /Capita Available Inventory as of FY2007 16.00 MGD Required Inventory as of FY2011 15.58 MGD Planned CIE FY 07 -11 0.00 MGD 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 0.42 MGD Minimum standards for Sanitary Sewer are being met or exceeded. It is estimated that wastewater demand for the project will be 31,725 GPD. This demand will not have a significant impact on the Regional Wastewater System. Arterial and Collector Roads: Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Drainage established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Drainage are as follows: Drainage LOS Standard Future Development (subsequent to January 1989) — 25 year, 3 day storm Existing Development (prior to January 1989) — current service level Available Secondary Inventory as of 10/1/06 187 Canal Miles Proposed Secondary Inventory ending FT2011 189 Canal Miles Planned CIE FY 07 -11 $115,378,818 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) N/A The proposed development in the amendment area will be designed to comply with the 25 year, 3 day storm routing requirements. Solid Waste: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary with standards for Solid Waste established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Solid Waste are as follows: G:\PROI- PLANNING D0CS\KITE95IPLN- TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD \GMPA(CPSS- 2006- I)\APPLICATIOMLOSDOC.dm KrrE951PLN Solid Waste LOS Standard Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at average disposal rate /previous 3 years Available Inventory as ofFY2007 1,972,809 Site Tons Required Inventory as of FY201 l 779,679 Site Tons Planned CIE FY 07 -11 0 Site Tons 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 805,750 Site Tons No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities are anticipated from this project. Parks: Community and Regional The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Regional Park Land is as follows: Parks LOS Standard 2.9412 acr Available Inventory as of 9/30/06 Required inventory as of FY2011 Planned CIE FY 07 -I1 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) .S/ 1000 population 1,037.05 Acres 1,441.30 Acres 777.00 Acres 372.75 Acres No adverse impacts to the existing parks are anticipated from this project. Impact fees at the current fee structure will be paid and provide funding for future park needs. Emergency. Medical Services The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for EMS are as follows: Emergency Medical Services LOS Standard 1 Unit/15,( Available Inventory as of 9/30/06 Required Inventory as of 9/30/ 11 Planned CIE FY 07 -11 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 00 population 22.5 Units 33.3 Units 11.0 Units 0.2 Units No adverse impacts to the existing emergency medical services are anticipated from this project. G:\PRO] -PLANNING DOCSVCrrE951PLN - TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD \GMPA (CPSS -2 W6- 1)WPPLICATIOMLOSDOC.doc Kn'E951 PLN Schools The proposed commercial project is not expected to have any impact on level of service for school facilities. Fire Control The proposed project tics within the East Naples Fire District. There are two existing fire station within 3.5 miles of the project site. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. GSPROJ - PLANNING DOGS \KITE951PLN - TAMIAMI CROSSING PUD \GMPA (CPSS- 2006- 1)\APPLICATIONUASDOC.d- KTTE951PLN Collier County Government Public Utilities Engineering Department 2006 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) POTABLE WATER SYSTEM - TREATMENT FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE AREA 02 Nov 06 (References are to the column numbers above) I . Fiscal starts October 1 and ends September 30. 2. 2001 - 2026 Peak Population (Seasonal) estimates and projections for the existing service area are based on "Collier County Water & Sewer Districts Population Estimates and Protections" dated September 27, 2006, prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department. Populations are based on using BEER High Range growth rate through 2011 and 95% of BEBR High Range growth rate from 2012 through: 2026. The peak population projections shown include the Orangetree Service Area beginning in FY 2012. 3 Reeuired Treatment Gaya N P 185 apcd Is obtained by multiplyingthe eak' Po yjajjon (Season. (Column 2) times 185 gallons per capita (peak population) per day. 185 gpcd is the established 1eJeI of Service standard (LOSS) as adopted in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update and verified by the So Florida Water Managment District for the Lower West Coast: Water Supply Plan, q Total ronstrvct#d Plant CaliMity On -line is the total finished water treatment capacity at the beginning of the fiscal year in Million Gallons per Day (MGD)- All plant cepacdies are stated in Maximum Month Average. Dally Demand (MMADD). Collier t Public Utilities :men; 10, 2006 ANNUAL UPDATE AN YREPC E - -- WASTEWATER SYSTEM - LEVEL OF $4 DARDS FOR SOUTH COUNTY WAT& I ASILITY (St 02�J< t The SCWRF ultimate capacity is reached In 2012. ;, 3 4 jores• 1Rslerencss era to the paiumn numhers 8:8 MGO Required Consttuc Peak Treatment Plant Fiscal Year Population Capacity @ 1 Capacity ' Range growth rate through 2011 and 96% of BEB, , i (Seasonal) 100 gpcd line (AUIR) )SS) ASSESSMENT (Deficit) Constructed onstructed Capacity Capacity Target Value dating service area are based on dohs' dated September 27, 2006, is are based on using BEER High for 2012. The SCWRF ultimate capacity for the SCWRF do not k Population- fSeasonall (Column 2) i Update. of the fiscal year in Fiscal Year The SCWRF ultimate capacity is reached In 2012. ;, a n, source at Information jores• 1Rslerencss era to the paiumn numhers 8:8 MGO 1. Fiscal Year starts October 1 and ends September;). ' 2. 2001 - 2012 peak P lat op_('y,@�,ss°onnaalI�1 estimate , ' ;. the "Collier County ater & Sewer�lsfripts Popul rqs. tktns foi shmSte9 and prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Pfaonl partrttarit: Pol ' Range growth rate through 2011 and 96% of BEB, , i Range growl capacity is reached in 2012. The service area pe k. latidn and to change after 2012. '+ 3. r is obtal try multiplying if , times ga Ions per capita {peak pope? anon) pee #;100 gpcd is tf (LOSS) for the South Service Area as adopted in U1; 6,0$ Wastewate rutted Plant Gana is the treatrrle I, t p= }'at t Million Gal ohs per ay ( tS II plant capaptti fielipFant t stated in Maximum Month Average Daily Flow (M 5. New Plant Capacity schedule is as follows:- s (AUIR) )SS) ASSESSMENT (Deficit) Constructed onstructed Capacity Capacity Target Value dating service area are based on dohs' dated September 27, 2006, is are based on using BEER High for 2012. The SCWRF ultimate capacity for the SCWRF do not k Population- fSeasonall (Column 2) i Update. of the fiscal year in Fiscal Year aw ant a n, source at Information 2004 8:8 MGO I Expansion to C 6. Total Available Constructed Capacity in MGD (Colt r it A e Column 5) 7 efic is the d) between Tot, ( umn6 and d e a (G 70 dt De fire Co tart c gciT 1 r Plyiirtg Pur thrdug 2012. when a timate p ant tapamty is rg, Itod. 1 I' is 0.26 MGD minimum ei y` Facility Type: Drainage Canals 8 Structures (Category A) Level of Service Standard: Future Development (subsequent to January 1989) — 25 year, 3 -day storm Existing Development (prior to January 1989) —current service level Symmarti of County Maintained Srtcorxtary Drainage tnvenfo Type of Facility Canal (miles) Structures Pump Stations Adjustable Control Weirs Fixed Weirs Treatment Lakes / Spreader Weirs Total Structures Drainage Canal Cost iFY 06 -071 FY 05.06 187 3 14 25 T 42 Available Secondary Inventory 10/1/06 Proposed Secondary inventory ending FY10 -11 FY06 -07 thru FY10 -11: Secondary New Secondary Facilities Reconstruction Secondary Facilities FY06 -07 thru FYI 0 -11: Secondary FYM07 thru FYI 0 -11: Tidal 1 Tertiary Reserves / Transfers Proposed Program FY06- 07 thru FY 10:-11 Existing and Proiected Revenue Sources FY 10-11 (Proposed) 189 4 15 47 77 Canal Miles Structures . Value/Cost 187 42 189 77 2 35 13 0 $83,921,192 $26,317,626 $5.140.000 $115,378,818 Ad Valorem (FY06 -07) $ 9,062,600 *BCB /SFWMD (FYM07) $ 4,230,000 *Other contributions / grants (FYO"7) $ 1,536,900 Carry Forward/Misc. (FY05 -06)14,394,19§ Sub -Total FY 06-07: $29:223.608 Ad Valorem (FY07 -08 to FYI 0-11 from S.W. Program' Q M15 Mills per year — estimate) $ 45,586,500 **SFWMD/BCB and other Grants (IFY 07-08 to'FY10 -11) $14,750,000 "*MSTVs and other unidentified revenue (FY 07 -08th FYI 0-11) $ 4,411710 Sub -Total FY 08.11: $ 86,155,210 TOTAL: $115,378,818 Notes: - On June 22"" 2004 the Collier County Board of County ComirrOssioners established a Stormwater Program' funded via 0-15 mills Ad Valorem securing funding beginning in FY05 -06 for the next 20 years. - Cost share ratios: capital Proiecis Tertiary Tidal Areas 113 County %Courtly %County 113 Grants (BCB) % Grants (BCB) % Grants (BCB) 113 MSTU's With Maintenance and Operation by MSTU's Collier Co Public Utilities Solid VI 2006 Annual Update Table 1: Collier( Level of Service Stand at Previous Three Years NOTES: (1) Fiscal Year starts October 1 and an (2) Population Estimates d Projections and projections. (3) FY07 forward is the average Tons F (4) FY00 - 06 are actual tonnage amou derived from Tons Per Capita Dispt Projections (column 2). (5) Derived from the previous years Lir Disposed (column 4) at the Collier ( Capacity Balance (column 5) are di (6) Derived from the sum of the next tH Landfill. (7) Derived from the Lined Cell Capaci Cell Capacity Requirement (eolumt 2006 AUIR Solid Waste 11 -21 -2006 Department sort (AUIR) I'l Disposal Capacity rs of Lined Cell Capacity s Per Capita Disposal Rate average population estimates posal Rate (column 3) of the previous three years- he Collier County Landfill. FY07 and forward are tmn 3) multiplied by the Population Estimates & olumn 5) minus Annual Tons of the bolded values in the Lined Cell Tons Disposed (column 4) at the Collier County 5) minus the Next Two Years Lined Facility TyQe: Regional Park Land (category Level of Service Standard (LOSS): 2.01 btc t�tt Unit cost: $200,000 /ac Using the �ainhted Pouulation metii©d th6 } hiving is set forth: Ai Acres V1e Available Inventory as of 9/30/06 � 1037.0 ,` 5 '. $207,410,000 Required Inventory as of 9/30111 I i> 1441.30 1 777.00 $288,260,000 $155,400,000 Proposed AUiR FY 06107 -10/11 i z .: , f r 372.& $74,560,000 5 -year Surplus or (Deficit) . 1. Exaenditnres Proposed AUIR FY 06/07 -10111 acgnw Anticipated loss of value due to acreage Debt Service Payments (accounted in +Ft Total Expenditures Revenuest Impact Fees allocated to fee simple ao Proposed added value through develope: Proposed added value through SFWMD Proposed added value through interd'e, Proposed added value through RBNW Total Revenues Revenues needed to maintain existing * For a complete description of change.. 05106, see Summary af' Changes in Pori ** Planned changes in inventory will r of regional parkland. * ** Planned changes in inventory incfti change of Golden Gate ,Estates Park lY community; 120 acres or $24 miltiomi ttPlanned changes in inventory mclutle,l t All other revenues, loan proceeds, done for in Facilities Value, tttPlamted changes in inventory include Paul PUD 90 acres, or $1$ million, and $155,400,000 ** $24,000,000 * ** $ 0 $179,400,000 $1,200,000tt $24,000,0001 t t $128;000,000$ $24,400,000$$ $1:800.000$$1 $179,400,000 none i land inventory FY 04105 to FY t Inventory, seepage 83. mat 777 acres, or $155.4 million, acreage designation nd from regional to uisition of 6 acres, or $1.2 million. orward, and reserves accounted trough developer contribution; Are. 30 acres or $6 million. Facility Type: EtnergeneyMe& Level of Service 5tatltiard: (Ali Unit Cost: $3,332,107 per new ui Weighted Population Calculations Available Inventory 9/30/06 Required Inventory 9/30/11 Proposed AUIR FY 06/07 -10 /11 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) Using the Weroht�t ° —n' Fxpenditures Proposed AUIR FY 06/07 -10111 Vi? 01 Debt Service Payments (exusting bon, }. Debt Service Payments (loan for $11 il% Total Expenditures ......... ... . Revenues Impact Fees anticipated......._ Commercial Paper Loan..... ... . General Fund (Lean) to make 110111* ci Total Retinues- - l' Additional Revenues Required or Lev *The Countywide ALS response response lime data reflected th response times in such areas as response time. The countywide countywide rural response time, The on scene time goal fin' n' med_ objective was achieved 822916 i safety issue (mechanical OrOpei The LOSS of I un)r 11 during the past several A LOSS of 000052 FIvtS amts t owned and leased units. t' i toi population or 0.000068,tcapita)* 7S, per co- Ideated unit *" r Va1llt:ICOSt 22 F $357719,322 * ** r3 $66,472332 * *'* I1 531,3227511 * * * ** '. $569,500 b §_ $31,321511 $2,295,100 $7 313.600 $40,931,211 s go $6,094,691 $11,042,900 n *xs * ** $313.600 $24,501,191 Reduction_ $16,430,02 TUFAL.. $40,931,211 ime 1* q/ the time The 1,Y 05.06 75% of the time with longer gas, ;increasing the overall average V itie't 82 77% ofthe time while the 051(16 data indicates this npleted flights without `a ti" t* 2000$ AUIR and has been emplo3v+d iT N� I of`sery'ice based upon the total 0f the THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Vanasse Naylor r ZONING TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT TAMIAMI CROSSING July 20, 2006 Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & US 41 Collier County, Florida Prepared For: Kite Development 30 S. Meridian Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 fob 4 80874.04 E415iT- V.E.Ic Prepared By: Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600, Fort Myers, Florida 33907 1 239.431.4601 F 239.431.4636 w vanday.com STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Ernest R. Spradling P.E. Florida Registration #61235 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 12730 New Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 (239) 437 -4601 Collaborators Reed K Jarvi P.E. Nelson A. Galeano Swarup Mukherjee P.E. 61235 Tamiami Crossing Statement of Certification US 41 Vanasse Qaylor CW h10 ArtAimqurt EnYwnmeNW L a Gri Enenmerm{ FL ){6 NNO N Lmq bukey ¢ n 104 in Npn R ))911 I NAO). rvdt,.um t IN1.417AM r SR 951 ru�4® we Kite D.. pment W S A4n0lan Sb f HMlan PaX W 48201 Jury 2008 I'm Ymn Tamlami Crossing Location Map Exhibit 1 S41 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................ ............................... 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... ............................... I SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... ..............................1 Site - Generated Trip Distribution PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................... ............................... 3 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE .............................................................................. ..............................3 Link specific Background Traffic Data AREACONDITIONS ..................................................................................... ............................... 3 STUDYAREA ........................................................................................................................... ..............................3 Intersection Analysis Results EXISTING GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ ..............................3 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................... ..............................4 SITE - GENERATED TRIPS ............................................................................ ............................... 5 TRIPGENERATION ................................................................................................................. ..............................5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT .......................................................................... ..............................5 SIGNIFICANCE TEST ANALYSES ........................................................................................ ..............................6 PROJECTED BACKGROUND AND TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES .................................... ..............................8 ANALYSES..................................................................................................... ............................... 9 LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSES ................................................................................ ..............................9 SITE ACCESS ANALYSES ...... ................. ................................ - ......................................................................... 13 IMPROVEMENTANALYSIS ..................................................................... ............................... 18 List of Tables Exhibit 1 Table 1 Site - Generated Trip Generation Table 2 Site - Generated Trip Distribution Table 3 Significance Test Table 4 Link specific Background Traffic Data Table 5 Link Analysis Results Table 6 Intersection Analysis Results List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Location Map Exhibit 2 Trip Distribution Exhibit 3 PM Peak Hour Site - Generated Trip Assignments Exhibit 4 PM Peak Hour Pass -By Trip Exhibit 5 PM Peak Hour Net Site - Generated Trip Assignments Exhibit 6 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Exhibit 7 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Appendix Tamiami Crossing Page i Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The project site is in the southeast quadrant of the Collier Boulevard (SR 95 t) & Tamiami Trail (US 41) intersection in Collier County (See Exhibit 1). The Project proposed land use will consist of approximately 213,000 square feet (sf) of Free - Standing Discount Superstore, 10,000 sf General Office, 6,000 sf Quality Restaurant and 6,000 sf High Turn Restaurant. Accesses will be via US 41, SR 951 and the adjacent Wal -Mart shopping center. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As shown in Tables 6 & 7, the link level of service analyses indicate that SR 951 from US 41 to Manatee Road and US 41 from Collier Boulevard to San Marco Road are projected to operate in excess of the performance standard maximum service flowrates (SF,„.) under Background Traffic conditions. The only feasible mitigation strategy consists of widening SR 951 north of Manatee Road into a six -lane facility, and widening US 41 east of Collier Boulevard into a four- lane facility. SR 951 from US 41 to Manatee Road was analyzed as a six -lane facility under Total Traffic conditions. This roadway segment is projected to operate within SF,„.. US 41 from Collier Boulevard to Greenway Road is projected to operated in excess of SF„. under Total Traffic conditions because no widening was considered in this analysis. The following intersection improvements were identified as being needed in order to accommodate projected total traffic: Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & Wal -Mart South Access: • Full- movement signalized intersection • 800 -foot southbound dual left turn lane • 450 -foot northbound exclusive right turn lane • 300 -foot westbound dual left turn lane. Tamiami Crossing I 80874 ZTIS- 002.doc Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & North Access: • Right In /Right Out unsignalized intersection • 400 -foot northbound exclusive right turn lane • 100 -foot westbound right turn lane US 41 & West Access: • Right In /Right Out unsignalized intersection • 400 -foot eastbound right turn lane • 50 -foot northbound exclusive right turn lane US 41 & East Access: • Full- movement signalized intersection • 400 -foot eastbound right turn lane • 575 -foot westbound left turn lane • 125 -foot northbound exclusive left turn lane The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fees as building permits are issued for the proposed project. In addition, the developer is a member of the US41 developer consortium which is working on a Development Contribution Agreement (DCA) to improve operation on US41 and the SR951/US41 intersection. Tamiami Crossing 2 80874 ZTIS- 002.doc PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE The project site is in the southeast quadrant of the Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & Tamiami Trail (US 41) intersection in Collier County (See Exhibit 1). The Project proposed land use will consist of approximately 213,000 square feet (sf) of Free - Standing Discount Superstore, 10,000 sf General Office, 6,000 sf Quality Restaurant and 6,000 sf High Turn Restaurant. Accesses will be via US 41, SR 951 and the adjacent Wal -Mart shopping center. AREA CONDITIONS The description of the existing environment of the site, the surrounding study area, and the committed improvements, provide a basis for the analysis of the site generated traffic impacts on the proposed roadway system. STUDY AREA The study area contains the following intersections: • SR 951 & US41; • SR 951 & Manatee Road; • SR 951 & Championship Drive; • SR 951 & Mainsail Drive; and • US 41 & Triangle Boulevard Exhibit 1 shows the project location as related to the studied roadway system. EXISTING GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS Existing roadway geometries were assumed. Collier Boulevard (SR 951 /CR 95 1) Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) in the study area is a north -south four -lane divided roadway. SR 951 is functionally classified as an arterial roadway under state jurisdiction south of US 41, CR 951 north of US 41 is a four -lane divided arterial roadway under county jurisdiction. The roadway Tamiami Crossing 3 80874_ZTIS- 002.dot alignment is fairly level and tangent. The speed limit is posted at 45 miles per hour (mph) north of Eagle Creek and 55 mph south of Eagle Creek. Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Tamiami Trail East (US 41) in the study area is a rural arterial roadway under state jurisdiction. It is a six -lane divided roadway through the SR 951 intersection, and reduces to a two -lane undivided roadway east of SR 951. Alignment of the roadway is fairly level and tangent. hi the study area, the limit speed of US 41 decreases from 60 to 50 mph. Therefore, the assumed posted speed limit is 50 mph. US 41 is signed as a north -south highway throughout the state of Florida. It has a northwest- southwest alignment through the study area. For purposes of discussion throughout this document, US 41 will be described as an east -west highway, with Miami oriented toward the east and Naples toward the west. The study area was determined to be US 41, east of SR -951 in the vicinity of the project. _ Manatee Road Manatee Road is a two -lane undivided collector street. It is under county jurisdiction, and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The only roadway improvements in the study area that are either planned or underway is the six- lane expansion of CR 951 from Davis Boulevard to US 41 scheduled to start in late 2006 /early 2007. There is a Development Contribution Agreement (DCA) to design and construct the widening of SR 951 approximately %: mile south of US 41north through the intersection from four lanes to six lanes. This is scheduled to be completed in October 2006. In addition, the US 41 developer consortium is working with Collier County staff on a DCA that will address an alternative to US 41 & SR 951 intersection. Tamiami Crossing 4 80874 ZTIS- 002.doc SITE - GENERATED TRIPS TRIP GENERATION Site - generated trips were estimated using Trip Generation, Internal Capture and Pass -By software (TIPS) developed by FDOT (see Appendix A). This program incorporates trip generation rates and deduction procedures consistent with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (7`h Edition) and the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (2nd Edition) in accordance with current Collier County policy. Table 1 shows the summary of the net new external site - generated trip estimates. TABLE BUILDOUT SITE - GENERATED TRIP ESTIMATES PM Peak TAMIAMI CROSSING NET NEW EXTERNAL Total Enter Exit SITE - GENERATED TRIP ESTIMATES (TIPS) 684 344 340 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The site - generated trip distributions used in this study correspond to the originally approved Wal -Mart report prepared by Kimley -Horn dated June 2004. The distributions were applied to the site - generated traffic volumes to determine the site - generated vehicle trip assignments. The PM Peak Hour traffic was used because retail commercial land uses have higher volumes in the PM Peak Hour. The Peak Hour project traffic distribution is shown in Table 2. Exhibit 2 shows a graphical representation of the traffic distribution percentages. Exhibit 3 shows the estimated AM Primary Traffic Assignments. Pass -By estimates are shown in Exhibit 4. PM Site - related Net Traffic Assignments are shown in Exhibit 5. Tanniami Crossing 5 80874 ZTIS- 002.doc TABLE 2 DISTRIBUTION NAME FROM TO DISTRIBUTION Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 16% US 41 Manatee Road 13% SR 951 Manatee Road Championship Drive 25% Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 30% Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard San Marco Drive 12% SIGNIFICANCE TEST ANALYSES According to Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 6.02.02 "M. Significance Test: Impact for the impact traffic analysis purposes for a proposed development project will be considered significant: 1. On those roadway segments directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or greater than 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; 2. For those roadway segments immediately adjacent to segments which are directly accessed by the project where project traffic is greater than or equal to 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; or 3. For all other adjacent segments where the project traffic is greater than 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segments using the above standards, the development's impact is not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments." In other words, a project will have a significant and adverse impact on a state or regionally significant roadway only if both of the following criteria are met: (1) the project will utilize 3 percent or more of the maximum peak hour service volume at the adopted level of service standard for the adjacent and next to adjacent link, 5 percent for the other links; and (2) the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted level of service standard. Significance was estimated according to Collier County's 3/3/5 rule, and the links were evaluated to determine whether projected operation would be within County standards. The data resources used for this analysis are shown in Appendix. Exhibit 6 shows the PM Peak Hour Projected Background Traffic as a result of using the perceptual proportion on each approach of turning movement traffic counts. Exhibit 7 shows the Buildout PM Peak Hour Total Traffic. The significance test analyses for the adjacent roadway network (see Table 3) indicate that SR 951 from the north access to Fiddlers Creek Drive and US 41 from Triangle to Collier Boulevard Tamiami Crossing 6 80B74_7TIS- 002.doc and from West Access to Naples Reserve Boulevard are projected to have site - generated primary trips that are greater than 3 percent of the AUIR Performance Standard Maximum Service Flowrate (SFna =). SR 951 north of US 41 and south of Fiddlers Creek Drive and US 41 west of Triangle Boulevard and east of Naples Preserve Boulevard are not projected to be significantly impacted. TABLE 3 PM PEAK HOUR SIGNIFICANCE TEST Site as STD Dir Site % of Link From To SFmAY Tries LOS Std Collier Blvd (CR951) Davis Blvd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 3,270 NB 17 0.5% Collier Blvd (CR951) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Tamiami Trail East (US 41) 3,330 NB 54 1.6% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Project Access 2,370 NB 139 S.9% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Project Access Wal Mart South Access 2,370 NB 65 2.7% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Wal Mart South Access Manatee Rd 2,370 NB 120 S.1% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Manatee Rd Fiddlers Creek Pkwy 2,590 NB 86 3.3% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Fiddlers Creek Pkwy Mainsail Drive 2,590 NB 69 2.7% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Mainsail Drive Isle of Capri Blvd 2,590 NB 51 2.0% Collier Blvd (SR 9S 1) Mainsail Drive Capri Blvd (CR 952) 2,590 NB 34 1.3% Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Capri Blvd (CR 952) Marco Island 2,590 NB 34 1.3% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Broward Street 3,500 EB 41 1.2% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Broward Street Barefoot Williams Rd 3,500 EB 58 1.7% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Barefoot Williams Rd Triangle Blvd 3,500 EB 76 2.2% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Triangle Blvd Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) 3,200 EB 103 3.2% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Project Access 1,075 EB 114 10.6% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Project Access Naples Reserve Blvd 1,075 EB 41 3.8% Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Naples Reserve Blvd Greenway Rd 1,075 EB 25 2.3% Link LOS analyses will be conducted on the significantly impacted links. The intersections to be given further analyses include US 41 & SR 951, US 41 & Triangle Boulevard, US 41 & Naples Reserve Boulevard, SR 951 & Manatee Road, SR 951 & Fiddlers Creek Parkway, SR 951 & Mainsail Drive and all proposed site accesses. Tamiami Crossing 7 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc PROJECTED BACKGROUND AND TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Background traffic volumes were developed using multiple sources. Specific Link volume data for SR 951, US 41 and CR 951 were provided by the Collier County Transportation Department. In order to calculate the Background traffic volumes, the projecting volumes based on recorded 2005 directional Peak Hour volumes and "banked" trips that were assigned to the links for previously approved developments (see Appendix- Concurrency Segment Tables dated June 30, 2006). This is the methodology that is currently in use by Collier County for tracking the availability of reserve capacity on specific roadway links as part of their concurrency management efforts. Table 4 presents the link- specific background traffic data used in the Link Level of Service analyses discussed elsewhere. TABLE 4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH PROJECTIONS - (CONCURRENCY SEGMENT TABLE) ConcSegments 06.30.2006 NAME FROM TO Collier Blvd Davis Blvd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Collier Blvd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd US 41 SR 951 US 41 Manatee Rd SR 951 Manatee Rd Mainsail Dr Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Triangle Blvd Tamiami Trail East Triangle Blvd Collier Blvd Tamiami Trail East Collier Blvd San Marco Dr TRIP REM TOTVOL BANK CAP SSS a 865 DIRK CAPA•Z 805 LOS 2,202 168 286 1,796 HR CITY g STD 591 2,061 1,139 613 VOL 3,270 6 E 1,850 3,330 6 E 1,730 2,370 4 D 1,850 2,590 4 D 1,510 3,500 6 E 1,820 3,200 6 E 1,470 1,075 2 C 640 TRIP REM TOTVOL BANK CAP SSS 2,405 865 795 2,525 805 352 2,202 168 286 1,796 794 453 2,273 1,227 591 2,061 1,139 613 1,253 -178 Growth projections were computed using the 2005 Average Daily Traffic Counts, Collier County. Table 5 contains the projected background traffic. The projected background traffic volumes from the directional peak hour volume were assigned to the roadway links. Background Traffic volumes were derived from turning movement and directional counts extracted from the Wal -Mart report and/or collected by FTE. Tamiami Crossing 8 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc TABLES BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH PROJECTIONS - FIVE YEAR (2011) DPK Growth HR TOTVOL NAME FROM TO 2001 2004 2005 Rate VOL 2011 2005 Collier Blvd Davis Blvd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 26,583 - 34,013 6.4% 1,850 2,678 Collier Blvd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd US 41 21,077 - 23,061 2.3% 1,730 1,980 SR 951 US 41 Manatee Rd 33,422 35,556 - 2.1% 1,850 2,094 SR 951 Manatee Rd Mainsail Dr 33,422 35,556 - 2.1% 1,510 1,709 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Triangle Blvd 36,312 - 40,948 3.0% 1,820 2,179 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Blvd Collier Blvd 26,082 27,758 - 2.1% 1,470 1,665 Tamiami Trail East Collier Blvd San Marco Dr 12,552 - I5,010 4.6% 640 837 The roadway capacities were derived from the Concurrency Segment Table, AUIR tables or from the FDOT QLOS table if a link was not on the Concurrency Segment Table. Copies of these data are in Appendix of this report. The intersection turning movement data were used to distribute the approach link volumes and to determine the dominant direction of travel. According to these data, the dominant direction on SR 951 is northbound in the PM peak. Exhibit 6 shows the projected PM Peak Hour Background Traffic that will be used for the intersection capacity analyses described elsewhere in this report. Note that, in addition to the primary site - generated trips, pass -by trips were also subtracted from the through traffic stream and assigned to the turning movements entering and exiting the site. The primary site - generated trips were added to the Projected Background traffic volumes to estimate the Buildout Year Total Traffic projections (See Exhibit 7). These projected turning movement volumes were used in the Intersection Capacity and Turn Lane analyses. ANALYSES LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSES The Performance Standard maximum Service Flowrates (Vm, ) for SR 951 were provided by Collier County Transportation Planning Department along with the Concurrency Segment and Tamiami Crossing 9 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc AUIR data. Tables 4 and 5 present the background traffic data and the projected Peak Hour Link Volumes, based on volumes from the current Concurrency Segment Table and growth rate methodology respectively. Tables 6 and 7 present the LOS analyses using the current Concurrency Segment Table and growth rate methodologies. The link level of services analyses using the Concurrency Segment Table projected Background Traffic volumes indicate that background traffic volumes on US 41 from Collier Boulevard to San Marco Road are projected to exceed the SF.. for those links. The same segments are projected to be within the SF.. using 5 -year historical projections. The only feasible mitigation strategy consists of the widening of US 41 east of Collier Boulevard to four - lane facility. SR 951 from US 41 to the south Wal Mart access was analyzed with total traffic in the six lane condition per DCA. This roadway segment is projected to operate within SF„.. Since no widening is planed for US 41 from Collier Boulevard to Greenway Road before project buildout, this link is projected to continue operating below SF,„. under Total Traffic conditions. TABLE 6 PM PEAK HOUR LOS LINK ANALYSIS irk From Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Project Access Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Eagle Creek Dr Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Manatee Rd Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Triangle Blvd Tamiami Trail Ent (US 41) Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Project Access Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Naples Reserve Blvd Based on ConcSegments 06.30.2006 ka sim Total I° Irgffbc Tri Raffk Project Access 2,202 139 2,341 Eagle Creek Dr 2,202 139 2,341 Manatee Rd 2,202 65 2,267 Fiddlers Creek Pkwy 1,796 120 1,916 Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) 2,061 103 2,164 Project Access 1,253 114 1,367 Naples Reserve Blvd 1,253 41 1,294 Greenway Rd 1,253 25 1,278 STD i� 2,370 2,370 2,370 2,590 3,200 1,075 1,075 1,075 Wil SC�L Y Y y y y N N N YY4 Y Y Y y y N N N Tamiami Crossing 10 80874 ZTIS- 002.doc TABLE 7 2011 PM PEAK HOUR LOS LINK ANALYSIS Based on Growth Rate Bkad i r Totol STD W11 W11 Link From 19 RaffN laps T a is LF , ild- Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Project Access 2,094 139 2,233 2,370 Y Y Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Project Access Eagle Creek Dr 2,094 139 2,233 2,370 Y Y Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Eagle Creek Dr Manatee Rd 2,094 65 2,159 2,370 Y Y Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Manatee Rd Fiddlers Creek Pkwy 1,709 120 1,829 2,590 Y Y Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Triangle Blvd Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) 1,665 103 1,768 3,200 Y Y Tamiami Trail East (US .41) Collier Blvd (SR 95 1) Project Access 637 114 951 1,075 Y Y Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Project Access Naples Reserve Blvd 837 41 878 1,075 Y Y Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Naples Reserve Blvd Greenway Rd 837 25 862 1,075 Y Y INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES Intersection capacity analyses were performed for the studied intersections using SYNCHRO® 6.0 capacity analysis software. Analyses were completed for PM Peak Hour, both with and without the project. Table 8 summarizes the analytical results and Appendix contains printouts of the analyses. The existing unsignalized side street approaches on SR 951 & Eagle Creek Drive intersection is projected to exhibit high computed delays. This is not unexpected, given the projected traffic volumes on SR 951 traversing the intersection. The only feasible mitigative measure would require signalizing the intersection. Tamiami Crossing I I 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc TABLE 8 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS The total traffic conditions analytical results included six - laning on SR 951 from US 41 to the Wal Mart South Access. This widening would increase not only the road capacity from 1,970 to 2,370 vph, but would also improve the intersection capacity, thereby reducing the congestion and delay. Closer examination of the intersection capacity analyses found that the northbound left- tuming traffic volumes at the US 41 & East Access intersection were projected to exhibit poor service levels (LOS F) under total traffic conditions. This is typical for unsignalized side - street STOP- Tamiami Crossing 12 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc Improved Scenario Background Traffic Total Traffic (6 Lane Divided on SR 951ICR 95 1) Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Delay LOS sedveh. sedveh. sedveh. Collier Boulevard (CR 951) & D 35 D 36 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & N/A F* 100 D *+ 26 North Access Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & D* 28 E* 34 Eagle Creek Drive Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & C 21 D 39 C+ 25 Wal -Mart (South Access) Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & C 22 C 28 Manatee Road Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & E 65 E 77 Fiddlers Creek Parkway Tamiami Trail East (US 41) & D 37 D 40 Triangle Boulevard Tamiami Trail East (US 41) & N/A C* 16 West Access Tamiami Trail East (US 41) & E* 41 F* 199 B 14 East Access * Denotes unsignalized intersection. + Six Lane Divided The total traffic conditions analytical results included six - laning on SR 951 from US 41 to the Wal Mart South Access. This widening would increase not only the road capacity from 1,970 to 2,370 vph, but would also improve the intersection capacity, thereby reducing the congestion and delay. Closer examination of the intersection capacity analyses found that the northbound left- tuming traffic volumes at the US 41 & East Access intersection were projected to exhibit poor service levels (LOS F) under total traffic conditions. This is typical for unsignalized side - street STOP- Tamiami Crossing 12 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc controlled intersections having relatively high main street through volumes and side - street left turning volumes. Under total traffic condition westbound left turning traffic volume is high enough (129 vph during PM) to warrant a westbound exclusive left turn lane on US 41. The northbound left turning traffic volume is also high (75 vph during PM) on the East Access. Signalizing this intersection, should it meet applicable warrants, is recommended. Signalization could decrease the computed delays at this intersection to allow operational efficiency to increase from LOS F to LOS B (14 sec /veh) for the PM peak hour. SITE ACCESS ANALYSES Site Access analyses were completed utilizing SYNCHRO® software and applied to Build -out year total traffic. The appendix contains the SYNCHRO® computer printouts. The purpose of these analyses is to evaluate the operational characteristics and needs of the site accesses, and to recommend access point locations. It was recognized during the study process the need for, and length of need of, turn lanes, and how those lengths of need would interact with neighboring intersections and improvements, would affect the recommended intersection configurations. Four parameters were used in order to reach the recommendations: current land uses in the area, traffic volumes, the capacity analysis results, and the turn lane length of need analysis results. According to the Collier County Right -of Way Ordinance #2003 -37, left and right tam lanes must be provided at accesses on multilane highways. The FDOT Standard Index 301 and Figure 3 -15 of the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards were used for conceptual geometric design (see Appendix). FDOT uses the roadway posted speed as the turn lane entry speed. According to FDOT Index 301, the deceleration lane length for a 45 mph posted speed is 350 feet, which is consistent with a 55 mph design speed. The FDOT Manual on Uniform Minimum Standards recommends a 50- foot minimum storage length for left turn lanes. The turn lanes on Collier Boulevard (SR 951) north of Eagle Creek and on US 41 should therefore be furnished with 350 -foot deceleration Tamiami Crossing 13 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc lanes in addition to the applicable storage lanes. Deceleration lane lengths of need on SR 951 south of Eagle Creek should be 460 feet long. Long left turn lanes should be used cautiously because of the potential to increase left -tum and rear -end conflicts. Every vehicle which joins the queue is exposed to a higher rear -end conflict than in a through lane because long left turn lanes encourage high approach speeds impacting of intersection safety. According to the PPM, "(c)omputer programs, such as TRANSYT -7F, are used to develop signal phasing and timing. One of the outputs of these programs is the queue length. For projects where traffic signal timing is included as a part of the project, the output of these programs should be considered in determining storage length." SYNCHRO® was used to analyze the operational characteristics of the signalized intersection. The PPM does not specify SYNCHROO because that program was not in general use when this PPM note was written; however, it has since been accepted by FDOT for operational and coordinated timing analyses. Since this program generally computes queue lengths that are consistent with those resulting from current Highway Capacity Manual procedures, its queue storage output computations should be considered during the storage length determination process. SR 951 & Wal -Mart (South Access) Access Point Location The access should be located on Collier Boulevard (SR 951), approximately 2,500 feet south of Collier Boulevard (CR 95 1) & US 41 intersection centerline. Southbound Left Turn Analysis This project is estimated to generate 148 southbound left turning movements during the PM peak hour. The total southbound left turn movements are 520 vph. Based on this information, a dual southbound left turn lane will be warranted at the Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & & Wal -Mart (South Access). The computed 95`h- percentile queue length was 277 feet. If the PPM queue computation was used, the turn lane of need would be 433 feet long. This dual turn lane should be 800 feet long (450 foot storage + 350 foot deceleration lane with taper). Sufficient Tamiami Crossing 14 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc longitudinal space should be available for the southbound left turn lane in order to avoid restricted length. Northbound Right Turn Analysis This project is estimated to generate 0 northbound right turning movements during the PM peak hour. The total northbound right turn movements are 348 vph. Based on this information, a northbound right turn lane will be warranted at the Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & Eagle Creek Drive Access. The computed 95 'b- percentile queue length was 90 feet. If the PPM queue computation was used, the turn lane of need would be 580 feet long. Consideration of allowing storage reduction is merited because right turn lanes are generally made more efficiently than left turn lanes. A northbound right turn lane is therefore warranted at SR 951 and South Access. This proposed right turn lane should be 450 feet long (100 foot storage + 350 foot deceleration lane with 50- foot taper). Sufficient longitudinal space is available for the northbound right turn lane. Access Drive Lane Configuration Analysis (Westbound Approach) This project is estimated to generate 198 westbound left turning movements during the PM peak hour. The total westbound left turn movements are 525 vph. The computed 95`h- percentile queue length was 284 feet. The westbound access lane configuration consists of an exclusive dual westbound left turn lane, exclusive right turn lane. At least 300 feet of storage should be provided before the first side street access opening, in order to avoid queue blockage. SR 951 & North Access Access Point Location The access should be located on Collier Boulevard (SR 951), approximately 910 feet south of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) & US 41 intersection centerline. The north access is proposed to be an unsignalized Right In /Right Out (RURO) access. Northbound Right Turn Analysis This project is estimated to generate 108 northbound right turning movements during the PM peak hour. Based on this information, a northbound right turn lane will be warranted at the Tamiami Crossing is 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & North Access. The computed 95`h- percentile queue length was 0 foot. If the PPM queue computation was used, the turn lane of need would be 180 feet long. Consideration of allowing storage reduction is merited because right turn lanes are generally made more efficiently than left turn lanes. A northbound right turn lane is therefore warranted at SR 951 and North Access. This turn lane should be 400 feet long (50 foot storage + 350 foot deceleration lane with taper). Sufficient longitudinal space is available for the northbound right turn lane. Access Drive Lane Configuration Analysis (Westbound Approach) This project is estimated to generate 182 westbound right turning movements during the PM peak hour. The computed 95`h- percentile queue length was 78 feet. The westbound access lane configuration consists of an exclusive right turn lane. At least 100 feet of storage should be provided before the first side street access opening, in order to prevent queue blockage. US 41 & West Access Access Point Location The access should be located on US 41 approximately 1,480 feet east of Collier Boulevard (SR 951) & US 41 intersection centerline. The west access is proposed to be an unsignalized Right In /Right Out (RI /RO) access. Eastbound Right Turn Analysis This project is estimated to generate 139 eastbound right turning movements during the PM peak hour. This exceeds the 40 vph threshold value. Based on this information, a northbound right turn lane will be warranted at the US 41 & West Access. The computed 95`h- percentile queue length was 0 foot. If the PPM queue computation was used, the turn lane of need would be 232 feet long. Consideration of allowing storage reduction is merited because right turn lanes are generally made more efficiently than left turn lanes. A eastbound right turn lane is therefore warranted at US 41 and West Access. This turn lane should be 400 feet long (50 foot storage + 350 foot deceleration lane with taper). Tamiami Crossing 16 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc Access Drive Lane Configuration Analysis (Northbound Approach) This project is estimated to generate 53 northbound right turning movements during the PM peak hour. The computed 95th- percentile queue length was 13 feet. The northbound access lane configuration consists of an exclusive right turn lane. At least 50 feet of storage should be provided before the first side street access opening, in order to prevent queue blockage. US 41 & East Access Access Point Location The access should be located on US 41 approximately 3,310 feet east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) & US 41 intersection centerline. The east access is proposed to be a signalized full- movement access. Westbound Left Turn Analysis This project is estimated to generate 86 westbound left turning movements during the PM peak hour. The total westbound left turn movements are 129 vph. Based on this information, a westbound left turn lane will be warranted at the US 41 & East Access. The computed 95th- percentile queue length was 160 feet. The PPM formula results in 215 -foot queue length computation. This turn lane should be 575 feet long (225 foot storage + 350 foot deceleration lane with taper). Sufficient longitudinal space should be available for the westbound left turn lane in order not to affect the bridge at Henderson Creek. Eastbound Right Turn Analysis This project is estimated to generate 12 eastbound right turning movements during the PM peak hour. The total eastbound right turn movements are 32 vph. Based on this information, an eastbound right turn lane will be warranted at the US 41 & East Access. The computed 95th_ percentile queue length was 15 feet. If the PPM queue computation was used, the turn lane of need would be 53 feet long. Consideration of allowing storage reduction is merited because right turn lanes are generally made more efficiently than left turn lanes. A eastbound right turn lane is therefore warranted at US 41 and West Access. This turn lane should be 400 feet long (50 foot storage + 350 foot deceleration lane with taper). Tamiami Crossing 17 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc Access Drive Lane Confi2uration Analysis (Northbound Approach) This project is estimated to generate 62 northbound left turning movements during the PM peak hour. The computed 95`h- percentile queue length was 105 feet. The northbound access lane configuration consists of exclusive northbound left and right turn lanes, At least 125 feet of storage should be provided before the first side street access opening, in order to prevent queue blockage. PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES Preliminary traffic signal warrant analyses were conducted on the US 41 & East Access intersection. Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Volume) of the MUTCD was used for this evaluation. The preliminary warrant analyses suggest that the intersection may meet traffic signal warrants during the PM peak hour. Comprehensive projected traffic signal warrant analyses should be performed at the SDP stage. IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS Because many of the analyses were addressed in previous sections, this improvement analysis section will be limited to a conclusive narrative. As shown in Table 5, the link level of service analyses indicate that US 41 from Collier Boulevard to San Marco Road are projected to operate in excess of the performance standard maximum service flowrates (SF„.) under Background Traffic conditions. The only feasible mitigation strategy consists of widening US 41 east of Collier Boulevard into a four or six -lane facility. SR 951 from US 41 to Wal -Mart South Access was analyzed as a six -lane facility under Total Traffic conditions. This roadway segment is projected to operate within SF,„. as a six -lane facility. US 41 from Collier Boulevard to Greenway Road is projected to operate in excess of SF.. under background and total traffic conditions, because no widening was considered in this analysis.. The following intersection improvements were identified as being needed in order to accommodate projected total traffic: Tamiami Crossing 18 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & Wal -Mart South Access: • Full- movement signalized intersection • 800 -foot southbound dual left turn lane • 450 -foot northbound exclusive right turn lane • 300 -foot westbound dual left turn lane. Collier Boulevard (SR 95 1) & North Access: • Right In /Right Out unsignalized intersection • 400 -foot northbound exclusive right turn lane 100 -foot westbound right turn lane US 41 & West Access: • Right In /Right Out unsignalized intersection • 400 -foot eastbound right turn lane • 50 -foot northbound exclusive right turn lane US 41 & East Access: • Full- movement signalized intersection • 400 -foot eastbound right turn lane • 575 -foot westbound left turn lane • 125 -foot northbound exclusive left turn lane The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Pees as building permits are issued for the proposed project. Tamiami Crossing 19 80874_ZTIS- 002.doc US 41 B_ 5% 22% ` Y m` L5% �t 5% 12% ` 13 12% 1 C A;,qh. N 4 L 5% o_ X C 951 VV N � x m° `1I C Raalesnake 7 E 1` Hammock Road ` ` 5% t1 22% 6% -V Not to Scale 3% 8% CR 951 f 8% M 25% 1 5% 5% `\ � X � 7% ~ ry B m o so Fiddlers Creek X Eagle Creek Drive 7% i Mainsail Drive � o 14, 5% 12% it K N p N H Proposed Wal -Marc 1 L 7% S_ J t5 35% L 10% x Manatee Road X X x N N Isle of Capri Blvd 14 Championship Drive X A N ,pmen rom r s X 1 X C 951 VV N � x m° `1I C Raalesnake 7 E 1` Hammock Road ` ` 5% t1 22% 6% -V Not to Scale 3% 8% CR 951 f 8% M 25% 1 5% 5% `\ � X � 7% ~ ry B m o so Fiddlers Creek X Eagle Creek Drive 7% i Mainsail Drive � o 14, 5% 12% it K N p N H Proposed Wal -Marc 1 L 7% S_ J t5 35% L 10% x Manatee Road X X x N N Isle of Capri Blvd 14 Championship Drive X A N raw nmc anasse Urbu lWning ir.M, Fsp'rcenng Kit. Development Y lanpsupt vain, nurz EnrironmenN ki116 P Taf171aff11 Q(OSSIng GrU Fngineerine FL 766 .9a 5 Merman Sb620 t��yr� {�a .__ mmanapmz, IN 16201 -- V Ry1 V r 12131 ga. liar, eu tnivi ii I, 444 Distribution Percentages Gi 1 v run apt R 1191 J* 20011 ,219.431.4601 .1411.111E Exhibit 2 . nedn.m US 41 ,pmen rom r US 41 US 41 B- 13 56 3 - m N d 13 II 30 IS 27 F A;iqle es I L 13 I` ` II 50 7 o0 Fiddlers Creek C 951 N r Ranlesmke t 7 VV E Hammock Road _ S 15 Not to Seale 20 CR 951 Nf" 20 4 I \ 11 13 �39 B Eagle Creek Drive e 30 L 13 IB Z Proposed Wal -Mart 1. L 16 IS , `I BO 10 Mainsail Ddve - - --- _ IS L 25 N 1 Mamma Road m sd 1 L 13 I I � Isle of Capri Blvd 4 + Championxhip Drive A N Uha Ilaonug IMu a g'Medng nvstm me raaa me' Vary(e i� �t UnNapr Mdnamn fn vmm nW Suenu Kite Development Tamiami Crossing 'G[' ass w+ rrvti hgiennog FL I{6 .90SAkrlman SlreN c1}/�CJi wane Mx,weeza AM Peak Hour -- 4J um K. faoq eeds.w, f.ie wo Traffic Assignment „ ggn, n llro1 duY g00a unmeml .vs.m.ml Exhibit 3 ..Yary..� US 41 US 41 B_ C 951 N e W E Rattlesnake 2 Hammock Road I`- S Not to Scale CR 951 S ' /► 3 45 4 - 1 I / US 41 N I / L--!— I � I / I / Eagle Creek Drive - -1— "" "" "—/ ___J 79 S _____ Manatee Road 14 Championship Drive UAm Phuoio' I Ennppveedng rvvum rcr, Nm uma VanaSSe Un4fopeAudunqurt E.1ir. enNknn KlteDevelopmenf TamiamiCrossing ad Fupnuem[ R 166 aos Mandan Steel Wanepde, IN 48201 (��'��j I� I 12111 Kee Pnmq e.wmn k We too pass -By Deductions V a O1 IM lie R 11111 jW' 2009 . 211.411.1601 .119.19.106 Exhibit 4 US 41 B_ 76 o d 17m \( 17 41 13 41 z A� vmi I L 17 L 17 j4 Ix 17 'o m It ` 17 ` 75 10 12 58 I] Y � t 8 m _ t E Fddlers Creek C 951 N # 7 W E C Rattlesnake j Hammock Road 21 Not Scale 28 CR951 \ f�2B/ 86 I7 17 Il _ hi m� Eagle Creek Drive 24 Z Mainsail Drive j4 17 Masasee Road Tamiami Crossing PM Peak Hour Traffic Assignment Exhibit 5 US 41 N m I I � Isle of Capri Blvd 4 L 17 Championship Dr'rve A � Vanasse nande{ Mu FKin nu{ LMkape p Mw.n 9eiramaiptal ldpa WloM P G i fnpan iq C4 FL 7{{ w&Develo ngif aeS Da ayla r I. l on. Iraher laulmi/, Win 100 fa Nps, n net HdaaapdS 1N,x2M apols IN 46 Jay aoae r119.O1.1116 Yl}1�417,1�1 Tamiami Crossing PM Peak Hour Traffic Assignment Exhibit 5 US 41 C 951 N US 41 W E 265 Rattlesnake 7 I(✓ 60 t` Hammock Road 137 57 Noll to 19 1669 1331 4f 8 42 139 �� 234 ^m ^I W410 810 C0.951 !� 332 r 261 R ♦ 251 411 %'p 1 in 338 799 30 hif m 619 773 2 E 1 753 3 43 606 4 — ` 1 � L 225 � 20 ` ll; 5 s 150 � n , ,/ U5,1 Fiddlers Creek I / V L N 43 , In — n Eagle Creek Drive 5 — —'1 — — — — — _ - f �► 1L N n N 85 i — Proposed Wal -Marc 1 t 241 1 y FF 116 �1 IS _______1 altwil Drive IS 327 IL t 284 n n `2 ^ �4 ^146 — ♦ Manatee Road t 160 I I Isle of Capri Blvd 71 J 110 14 Championship Drive 97 i — c A = — IeS19m NM MGf on" /�� law Plwug Trek .etal sales{ Me Development lT7 C"ifiVa A.divasrt FsnasnmeAtY L sales, 6 W S Ekntllen Sena Tamlam7 Crossing fid 6pseeiq R ffi Wampn9a, IN 48204 Projected PM Peak Hour -� Ci .�/�OC ;. 2730 w "7uwa.a4. Iw IN Background Traffic / "I'" Exhibit 6 `:31.437. 01 an.n24n1 US 41 B_ 265 Iv 60 \ � 154 1 407 4l 3 ; / Ae� N N 1 1 L 242 �1 I50 9 ry L IIS 1 4 0 116 10 tr s m° r ` 74 1744 X52 C 951 R=Iesnake 7 Hammock Road 21 " 234 838 CR 951 f 36 ` jk 251 355 30 261 497 4V1 816 1� `1tr\636 �m I 1 too Capri BNd 71 t 97 - — 177 [to 4 rChampionship Drive am A 561 12\ n U541 L 265 5 Dr, 25 _ Y tr 1 `a� Ushu %anon{ ENfia E '10ssiag VCl „a� � age Kne Development ILi L>�+va ��n Eelboamanul SkaKa Tamlamt Crossing JO S A,edNan Strael ra Eaginarpe Fl us Mdlanapa l IN 4ezoa Projected PM Peak Hour r1 /' N nm ft uuil�..l I.*” SK, we Total Traffic Gi.j ! IMAMRANl MY 2" n 23f4A.N2{ Exhibit 7 Fiddlers Creek L 65 I / / m I I / Eagle Creek Drive 5 _______/ 1 � �m 109 Z — Proposed Wal -Mart 1 1 Z — Is __3 Mainsail Drive ' L 318 14 ^ ^146 i Mana[ee Road too Capri BNd 71 t 97 - — 177 [to 4 rChampionship Drive am A 561 12\ n U541 L 265 5 Dr, 25 _ Y tr 1 `a� Ushu %anon{ ENfia E '10ssiag VCl „a� � age Kne Development ILi L>�+va ��n Eelboamanul SkaKa Tamlamt Crossing JO S A,edNan Strael ra Eaginarpe Fl us Mdlanapa l IN 4ezoa Projected PM Peak Hour r1 /' N nm ft uuil�..l I.*” SK, we Total Traffic Gi.j ! IMAMRANl MY 2" n 23f4A.N2{ Exhibit 7 561 12\ n U541 L 265 5 Dr, 25 _ Y tr 1 `a� Ushu %anon{ ENfia E '10ssiag VCl „a� � age Kne Development ILi L>�+va ��n Eelboamanul SkaKa Tamlamt Crossing JO S A,edNan Strael ra Eaginarpe Fl us Mdlanapa l IN 4ezoa Projected PM Peak Hour r1 /' N nm ft uuil�..l I.*” SK, we Total Traffic Gi.j ! IMAMRANl MY 2" n 23f4A.N2{ Exhibit 7 APPENDIX • Collier County Concurrency Segment Table June 30, 2006 • Turning Movement Count Data SYNCHRO° 6.0 Analysis Printouts FDOT Standard Index 301 Tamiami Crossing Appendix ConcSegments_06_30_06.x1s 1 Airpod 2 Airport 3 Airport _ 4 1Hkport _�.5 ._.. AirpM 6 Airport 7 Bayshore �...�... Y 10 County 71 CR 12 Davis 13 14 15 4 16 1] 16 19 ly 20 L _ 21 ,. 22 23 24 25 �. 25 Road Immokalee Road Vantlerbitt Roatl Pine Road Golden Roatl - J Radio Road Davis Drive US _ Barn Roatl Davis - -- 29 US Boulevard s Davis Boulevard Akport Davis Boulevard _ Lakewood Davis Boulevard _ Da is Doulevard Goltlen Gate Boulevartl Golden Gate Parkway_ Goltlen Gate Parkway Goltlen Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway Goltlen Gate Parkway Gootllette -Frank Road Gootllette Frank Roatl Gootllette Frank Roatl Gootllette Frank Road Road VaMeront Beach Road Plne Ridge Road Golden Gate Parovay Radio Road Davis Boulevard US 41 Thomason ._. .__ Boulevard Rattlesnake - 4t C1lokoI US dt AirpoM1 Road Lakewood Boulevard County Bam RoROad Santa Barbara Boulevard Colter Boulevard^ US 41 - v Gootllette Frank Roatl Anport Roatl y 175 1775 4 Santa Barbara Boulevartl Immokalee Road .m Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road Goltlen Gate Parkway Beacn noa0 Ridge Road Gate Parkway Road Boulevard 0 Drive ____.... _Hammock » skee llsland Road Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard Wtlson Boulevard Goodlette Rank Road AupoM1 Road v LL y Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gale Parkway US 41 ""ou 3970 3830 3230 6100 2580 1950 m 1860 4 875 , 3420 2080 2430 .� 2400 1530 2350 3180 4350 4370 3730 1980 1190 u.- 2790 3420 3500 . 6 6 6 6� 6 4 �_. .��- 4 �` 2 6 4J d 4 2 4 w 6 6 6 6 4 - 2 �m 6 6 6 «.m, E E E E E 0� DHU D E D 0 D� D D E E E E r D D D _f E E °• ° 2340 2210 2620 2370ry 1930 740 �.._.�.. 690 181 1950 l 1930 -! 1930 1860 —1120--- 124 1200, 2670 20fi0 2070169 1750 635 _ 1160 1460 1850 ..� --7 527 523 289 240 211 u 55 234 W d - -T 150 1 107v} 236 514 508 .278^ 76 171 270 102 157 - 177N 280 175' - - -' 20fi7 2733 2869 2870 2141 795^ _.,_,._ �9�24 -185 J 2100 2037 2165 2374 1626 1518�p832� 1276 2861 2330 2239 1932 787 1337 1740 ! 7965 -- 1103 1097 341 1480 439 1155 ��. 936 690 1320 43 265 26 98 1904 l m1509 2040 49tq 48 403 _ 145J _I 1680 1535 2] Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 1040 2 D v 660 39 ._y 719 321 29 Gultshore Drive 111th Avenue r VantlerbA[ Beach Roatl 530 2 D 250 16 I 266 264 30 Collier Boulevard Immokalee Road Golden Gate Boulevard 3300 6 E 1010 932 1 1942 1358µ 31 u 32 33 Collier Boulevard ' Collier Boulevard Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevartl Green Boulevard I -75LL Green Blvd I -75 Davis Boulevard W 3300 2260 6 4 E i D 1680 1470 678 600 2358 2070 942 190 3690 fi E 3300 598 3898 -208 oilier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Ham mock 3270 _ fi E 1850 555 _ 2405 865 ,34.. 7--3T 'i: ,� 37 Collier Boulevartl T SR 951 - SR 951 yf Rateesnake Hammock LUS 41 Manatee Roatl _ US 41�� Mana!do Roatl MainjaH Dr v 3330 6 E 1730 795 2526 805 1970 .� 2590 4 - 4 D D 1850 �1510� 4 352v I ry 286 2202 7796 -232 794 ^ 36 39 -- 40 41 42 43 d4 46 �46 SR 951 _ (111th Avenue N 111th Avenue N 11mm.k.lee Road _ Immokalee Road Immokalee Road Immokalee Road Immokalee Road a Immokalee Road Mainsail Or ,., Gultshore Drive Vanderbil Drive US 41 Airport Road 1 -75 Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road Marco Islarid Bridge Vanderbilt Drive US 41 Airport Road ~ 175 Logan Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Oq Well Road Everglades Boulevard 2480 T60 1040 A 3030 3290 4370 3780 3670 v 860 4 2- ...... _ 2 6 6 6 fi 6 2 D_ D D _ E u E E E v E D 1500 j 350 770 2000 2290 2130 1100 1280 220 I 5 22 _... 88 561 T 697 1501 697 - 593 146 1505 372 858 2561 2987 3631 i 7797 1873 366 975 386 182 469 303 739 1993 1797 494 47 Lake Trafford Road West of SR 29 SR 29 875 1 2 1 D 330 1 7 1 337 538 48 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 990 2 1 D 430 127 557 433 49 51 Logan Boulevard Livingston Road Pine Ritlge Road Imperial rial Street Green oulevard Immokalee Road 2070 3260 4 fi D D 1220 570 201 156 '�61 1421 726 649 2534 52 Livingston Road Immokalee Roatl V- derail: Beach Road 3890 6 E 1000 1067 2829 53 Livingston Road VandeNgt Beach Road Plrie Ridge Roatl 3090 8 E 1000 200 1206 2684 54 Livingston Road Pine Ritlge Road Goltlen Gate Parkway 4000 6 E 7370 394 1764 2238 55 58 LWingston Roatl N. 1 st Street ^� Golden Gate Parkway New Markel Road Radio Roatl Main Street _ m 4000 R 1000 6 2 E �D 1260 ti 400 223 1483 2517 16 416 J 584 59 New Market Road Broward Street W� SR 29 r p 7010 2 D 430 47 677 533 61 62 Camp Keais r� Old US 41 CR BSB �_y Lee County Line Immokalee ad US 41 860 1010 2 2 D D 130 780 203 70 333 650 52] 160 T 63 66 Seagate Drive ry Pine Rkge Road on Roatl �� U$ 41 v-- Goodlette -Frank Road = 1620 4 D 930 66 898 622 2730 6 E 2010 229 2239 491 fF65 66 Pine Ridge Road Pine Ritlge Roatl ette -Frank Road rGd y Street Shirley Street Airpo rt Roatl 3300 3730 6 8 E E 2760 2760 365 392 3125 3152 175 578 �67 68 69 Pine Ridge Road._ Pine Ridge Road Radio Road _ Airport Road 1 -75 Airport Road 1 -75 an Boulevard Livingston Road 3730 3790 2180 6 6 4 E 1 E D 2800 1 2190 1300 741 1 230 290 --1-77- 3561 1 2420 1 1590 188 1370 590 70 d Radio Road Livston Road ing Santa Barbara Boulevard 2120 4 D 7560 1737 363 71 _ Radio Road Santa Barbara Soutevard Davis Boulevard 1 2120 4 D 1250 262 1 1512 1 608 72 Rattlesnake Hammock US 41 East Chademaglle BoWevard 1940 4 D 1180 731 1 1371 629 73 Rattlesnake He Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 1940 4 D 1010 127 1137 803 ]4 Rattlesnake Hammock County Barn Roatl Polly Avenue 2340 4 D 820 135 955 7385 ...n.a+ ComSegments 06_30_06.xls 75 RaHlesnake Hammock Poily AVeoue Gelber BOUlevara -- 1531 76 Santa Barbara BoWevard Green Bouevartl Gdden Gate Parkway 1930 6 D 1360 171 T7 Santa Barbara Boulevard Gdden Gate Parkway Ratlio Road 3070 6 E 1520 363 1883 1187 78 an Barbara Boulevard Rad'a Road Davis Boulevard 2790 6 E 970 536 1506 1284 80 SR 29 US 41 _W. CR 837 075 2 C 130 0 130 745 81 SR 29 CR 837 1 -75 875 2 C 130 0 130 T45 82 SR 29 ~ -� CR 858 875 2 C 130 35 165 T10 SR 29 CR 658 �_ CR 29A (New Market) 875 2 C 460 96P - 556 319 83 a N 15th St 1860 4 C 700 116 1 816 1044 86 SR 29 CR 29A South h 2 W C 290 39 329 546 85 SR 29 N 15th St CR 29A Nort - - -- 875 - -�� 36 SR 29�� -_ - - -- CR 29A North _ SR 82 875 2 _�.._ C 540 69 - 629 246 87 �_. - ..._..�_. SR 29 ....- ......�._ Mentlry County Line ._....._...,..w_.. -.. SR 82 875 2 G 290 10 300 575 68 SR 02 ,R. Lee County Line - SR 29 875 2 C 540 84 W 624 251 89 Tamiami Tra6 East u Four Corners Gootllede-Frank Road 3410 6 E 2090 89 2179 1231 90 Tamiami Trail East Gootlletle -Frank Road Davis Boulevard 3850 B E 3500 206 3706 144 rt — 91 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard AFpc;; Road m^ I 2750 6 E 1970 2870 373 373�T- 3243 407 -43. F 92 Tamiami Trail East Airport Rattlesnake Hammock 3200 6 E -. Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Triangle Boulevard 3500 6 E 1820 453 2273. i. 1227 ,.g3 94 ` ! Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 3200 6 EE - 1470 591 2061 1139 's 95 Tamiaml Trail East Collier Collier Boulevartl San Marco Drive 1075 2 C j 640 613 1253 -178 96 Tamiami Tratl East an Marco Drive SR 29 Datle County Line 1075 875_ 2 1 2 C 1 G 270 220 10 3 280 223 795 652 97 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 11Y-- 90 Tamiami Trail North ,m Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 2400 6 �6 E E 19ID 2510 184 351 2094 2061 306 X659 99 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 3520 100 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road VantlemAl Beach Road 3370 6 E JE 2560 372 4194 2932 438 101 Tamlami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 3440 6 2490 2684 756 102 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive ^ ' Pine Ritlge Road 3550 6 E 2800v 188 2988 562 301 _ 103 Tamiami Trap North Pine Ridge Road M Solana Road ..� 34106 E� _ 3010 99 X52 € 3109 104 Tamiami Trail North - Solana Road Creech Road 3470 6 E 2]90 2842 628 105 Tamlami Trail North Creech Roatl _ Gdden Gate Parkway 3320 6 E 2550 60 2610 710 106 Tamiami Trail North Golden Gate Parkway Cedral Avenue 3880 6 E i 2120 73 2193 1667 107 Tamiami Trail North Cen0al Avenue GOOdlelte -Frank Roatl 3880 6 E 2180 54 W 2234 1646 v108 Thomason Drive Bayshore Drive US 41 East 760 2 D 400 1090 58 56 656 1146 302 109 Vancemat Beach Roatl Gulfshore Drive _ US 41 w 1290 v 2 E 144 110 Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 Airport Road 1820 4 D 1610 33fi 1746 ]d 111 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road .., Logan Boulevard 3540 6 E 1440 299 1739 1101 112 Vanderbilt Beach Roatl Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 3600 6 E 710 304 1014 2586 114 Vanderbilt Drive Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 1075 2 D 640 93 733 342 115 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 111th Avenue 1150 2 0 670 51 721 429 117 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive US 41 1050 2 D 460 107 567 483 122 Oil We9 Road Immokalee Road Everglatles Boulevartl 1010 2 D 530 177 707 303 126 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 2800 4 D 1240 93 T 1333 1467 127 Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard GR 851 3250 6 D 2240 188 2428 822 ...nms �:__, \��\ !!!!` ;I� ;� Vii) �� ! /,8; ��¥i�!{ )� {; !! |}!` ! z ^I k W O W O r N 0 N P N P M �O N P ap O r ON M � o O M M o Q n C J O t J .L m P 0— p, P— W O O o c0 m vl OJ O N P M O b o t F' N Y m M VI Q— O {f1 Q Q Q Z er M N O C J M O OOn C 0 O N N Y m M VI Q— m {f1 Q Q Q vl er M N O C J O L H V W J V J L O P c O M Q M C J LO � of L L n M b P r M h O Q a j F- y N Q 00 V1 m N m N N O 0� O N E C' n P M— r rN bN m Q va`i v L v v ° v n v n E 0 Z E o t F V v~ F v C C v 0 t V~I N N V~i V1 r r r r IG CU GD V! Q e — 1f1 O b M P tf1 M Ifl N N o N m P o° Q N O O n n O OOn C 0 O N N N o N m P o° Q N O O n n 0 iu C O N O Lo O °o, E w 0 0 O N O co E 0 ZU� (D Co iL(nU) d I � U m C d U L i Q > U > C) v O co 2 N Q m Q m 'L U O 6 _ _ m N > 9 0 c°v E N = N CO CO t E C Y a �i m W o m N W m W N M r m V r M r W r m N W N momm Mm M- N n N N N m N N N m W m r r v m m R M Q (D W O N M m O N n rn N o a h m �v .-Wmm mmNrmW mvm "NNW N N m m ^ m m mm -0-N N NNO W m�YN 60 rn V M m V N rn m N N m m m N r n W n 0 vama mnmWrn mrm NN n N N-Nm ra; �.j N W 0000 0 o o O O 000 00 mmm m mvvW m�WmW m,r0 N m m W N N � M � M W 0o W N W Mm M V m- m m m M m N W 000o 00000 000 0a 0000 00000 Oo0 00 M W N M N N O O W V n N N m m m N O M O N N MN m m W m o O W O W m m NNW NMMM7 0rm ro N m o o noQ�nlo- ovaio Q Foo 6 L39 v a� 000 0000 roQ C7 rn m co R O N r I E rn0 0 C1 O ca C -0 m UNQZ O co m C } a) O (D c O 7 c U 7 �UUU m W o m N W m W N M r m V r M r W r m N W N momm Mm M- N n N N N m N N N m W m r r v m m R M Q (D W O N M m O N n rn N o a h m �v .-Wmm mmNrmW mvm "NNW N N m m ^ m m mm -0-N N NNO W m�YN 60 rn V M m V N rn m N N m m m N r n W n 0 vama mnmWrn mrm NN n N N-Nm ra; �.j N W 0000 0 o o O O 000 00 mmm m mvvW m�WmW m,r0 N m m W N N � M � M W 0o W N W Mm M V m- m m m M m N W 000o 00000 000 0a 0000 00000 Oo0 00 M W N M N N O O W V n N N m m m N O M O N N MN m m W m o O W O W m m NNW NMMM7 0rm ro N m o o noQ�nlo- ovaio Q Foo 6 L39 v a� 000 0000 roQ C7 rn m N r rn 0 W N m m m W W W W O m N N N m 0 N N N m N m o O O mon r r m mo n n Wmm M M n n m m n W W m m C W W N N N WIN N N N W O Q O Q N N O O O O Q N O Q O O O O m o o m r r r r 0 0 0 0 m m ma° N N W W 0 N N ml m m O N OWN N N N 000 0 00 0 0 0 �7m <vn°'Q W m 0m r r m 0 0 0 a ov ovm a 00m 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0 000 0 o0 o 0 0 Y N a Nm°W m m Nm mmm m � m m a O0— O n O -0- O M M 2 m M 0 o ao 0 0 c t d o . d E 0 a or c o E S« E o 02EE02 z�a %L d0LL Mi Ua M > d m v v d r n o m o = %� a a ov ovm a 00m 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0 000 0 o0 o 0 0 Y N a Nm°W m m Nm mmm m � m m a O0— O n O -0- O M M 2 m M 0 o ao 0 0 c t d o . d E 0 a or c o E S« E o 02EE02 z�a %L d0LL Mi Ua M > d m v v d r n o m o = %� a co C ��nommm mmm�n ca Faminmm �ammm N. S o N LO O ppNmM�om 0 m N (0 00 v O O E ca � Q 200000 -000- "�-N a1 �pz ¢ o 0 1 z J Q aY U LL (n (n d 0 a m Jr= O N O N W 0 N a2 M J J 0 OZ U 2wmmoo �N�mm mom M n mmm N m Q U .e00000 00000 000 J O O t SN V M m N O t N m N mx m F o I U ¢ C 2 0 0 0 0 0 M O O M m m m V 0 O N CO F- �0 Y � r 0 m >0� 0 co W D r O- O- N 0 0 0 0 0 N N" O m op 1 Q m N W N 2 L = Q y ON C2 200000 00o00 000 a` L` 0 0 1 0 Q y = N ( Q �rF-- (7 �NM�mm oo Mo Mmm 1 E Y �n F M m o NVMM Mnw m m m 1 O >Q> 2000000 00000 coo C; 1 W ¢ J 7 0,— cr O.t o0 00000 000 ¢�,_ 00 ui N O0 Y (a U M "" M N u� O i 1 V� m F MNMM N M MM�t N mm C� G 0 � � i O N U � Nip M � V M mMm NC6 L6 I n J N m m 1 rn v E m OC o v co Ci N Q Z nii a 7a ¢¢¢¢o ¢¢¢¢o o.c� co Co O MV o—m U} M^o oo0 0000 �Q N O (7 C C U 1 O O �UUU 6112 co C cd I O N O O CQ EOr td O O r E y 0 Co 0 Z I Z or N CO N LL (n fn a I I I U C to p m (�U (G (O Ce) O T O N O a Q CO •c p C O V N LL E f" d TN N E Y 1 I I � Q) LO m f � U i O 0 r N E CCo�cd ()NQZ i T i m m } (D =O C C C C _UUU O —IN N N 0 Olh T O SIN N N N OI�D O T W L 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 O O 2500000 00000 0 0 0 00 210000 O O O O O 000 L O O .CO�O-N NNNOW RIOT O RI O O 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O O DoOoo 00000 000 00 000Oo 00000 000 00 00000 ooOOO oo0 00 00000 00000 000 00 00000 o0000 00000 000 00 00000 0 0 0 0 0 000 00 0O O O O 00000 O O O 00 0ooOo oo -0- o .- o 22 <<M aeo �QQQQO o.Oro 'o�c0� 0m 0!1� ~� 0 �0000 0000 �Q~ (7 )0-/,3 m E O N O Lo CO O E O r C.O Or N (D 0 C O 0 Z Z U V a) LL (n U) IL U C w U N > I >m o c� _ CO V) O a v Q CO L o O L _.... LL > i ~ Q t U N E = N c6 m O i E c Y a I m C U i � � O F- U LL o -0 co (nNQZ 0 a3 m C .} N O C C U O O �UUU m n m- M n m m N M m�d'IO (OmOmm N mmmm mmmnm m m, ojn mom. -n n v m�oN n. -o�nv � taar Mavmm m .a j K m n O N n O N m m V O m M m N O L m m N m mw—or N m m L OWN mnv n m mN nNa mV mmy o M o N m o M M 0 m -MN O O jp m m O- m m n V N" m m ommom0 rmmmm 0 ai r =.-! mn o 0.-n' m MOO NN�-Nn MON _ � N Lcanmmm Ommam m�a m m m n M M O N M m p y a 20000o OOOOo 000 F o0 r Nmm m O m 0 0 C6 N j m M N N N N m N N 0 N 0 rj A�mN�m m0 V OM (� q smcn+�v0 °v cmnMmv m v ¢00000 00000 000 0 00 H 4000010 O O O O O 000 O O ]2� m �m d m M"n O o m o ,m m y co M m m m N M m N M N N m m mvmmv mm mmm N mlnmN �`(p °��2m fee CL a a a o a a a a o 0,-, ro�mv o�c�a a a� o°oo� 0000 roQ~ (7 N m � 0 M 0 r am r v am mNYI N m�O N N a n n N mL6 m m am a�noam oM N O m O O O O m °O °m °0 °m m 0 m m M m 0 0 0 v m 0m m O rN m n n N vm of m v �a 000 O o0 0 0 0 N°cmo aN aN°aN m m O0 m 0 0 0 0 m m N� m m N M °m N 0Omi 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0 000 0 00 o O O O Y N N a NO ow m m v anOVmi a� oam��m N O N C O O a 0 O O 4 E cm E` E E O o° E 0 S E O W 0 N.0 N O N = O L E >a >LL a >LL 2 a >a a > °LL m m= m aQ = m a° C om a o = Y ` U m // a a5 r000 E O N Lo 00 co E O T QO O* (D (D . E pr)Z ZUCa) i a) CO c0) U- (n 0) d p t i 0 C U) f � L U > Ch O (h N 0-0 + Q [0 -c- LL + L Q = N cu m T F- + E Y + m o m m <m r Q) C I o p L w N w U T U) r F- 0,0 (q N ¢ Z O M M C O + O cUUc O W t Fr J 0 J N ,� 2ammmm vn�cm �v,( U 000- Nmi J m. m Faaaao aaaao or OmO1N�Po F' � O m Q O r [7 V 9 O. 0000 0000 �Q O i n a' V mvan o o m m <m r r gN M yy NN N �N�r r r F- O Q000�o� 0 00000 m moo w m m J a cm O L L O O--- M M N N O cr W Wt ¢ ¢ J 0 0 O p Z U m m N N N a m p p M O m m C N x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 06 �NM C C V O O MN-a O O O m O N H f. r r O� Cc�t,N��Nm U U. -.-ml- m mom W o a a uu W ;Qm �Z �i a 2000o0 0 00000 0 000 t O O O L 1 1- 0 7 o o o .- N N o- o- N N v O- W - N W S � � n 6 Q 0 0000 0 O O O O O O O C 0 0 o F c J 7 0 m p00000 O OOOOO OOc mom._ 6 6 i n a' V w c It HS 0 0 � O N O co O E O r 0.00— O O � ro OQZ Z U v v Q Li U) cn IL 1 w � r co w .0 ) (h 0 M N O O U LL V U) ` 0 n C\J CJ T r i- i E Y Vol Y C O � N LO E d � N Q Z cz C ` c O co m c C: c U N = 0 r- C) i i C-/3 H ommom somoN�n � 1m`, a F ¢O OOOOO 00000 000 Q � s J 0 D m J� O O o 0 0 00000 O O O ¢n° ._ od W r J J 0 0 Z U 200 0 0 0 00000 O O O L O Ci d) Q m O � 00000 O O O O O O O o O 1- 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 O O O Q OQ = Q C) D �¢ c 0,�00000 00000 000 W 66 a _ u y =Z� �� 200000 00000 000 00 7 00000 00000 000 O O O H N 4 Q QQ O O O O O 00000 O O Q G O c 2 0 C m m p 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O w d O C U1 J O Om C) v X 0 0 0 0 0 00000 o O C OC m Q m OmNN 1 N OC a. (La.Em Q.a- (L�m ou rooa �aaaas daa(L o sr -, V)M`�~ °o M 0!q moo NO000 0000 roQF (7 i i C-/3 T � V O O Lo O E O N ¢SOO�- Q) Y Co 0 Z Z U m a to ro 'u= cn in o_ U C i U mco o co n O 'D L 0 N LL C C Q 6 = N CO (D E Y U C U Lo r N y [1: O-0 t0 cANQZ Occ coC C } =O rnC: C: C) N > > �UUU m rn�o mmc� °n rmrnmen,� mmrnrn0 n m m i°'v mmm nm�'�1In - O C m m N NON m C m N O O --MN ONimm V _ N .-0 Om M m m m m Nom a M— N tnmm N mmmmo Noire N m M m m r O N om —m 0< M a O m mN rem m m m C m o V] m V N M N O N N N M N N h C M N N N M N N o ] V ONm NNmrnN m( fro nmN n �D mN rn mOrNmm nN Nm� N .N -r(Om� N N mmm m N m N C m M O m O N N L> N�NN p m rOCNN r m��N� m'(V N� �tnV � �NNmr tin rnm m m rn mmnnN M m m M WNn m 0 o m �ci� m m N N m mmo M N O n W O n m mmrno mrnmmn wma N N M M N N M M l — M m n r 0 0 N m O m O I N n v m m tV 0 c+� m N C a C N r0 N ^ N m 4 n N O U N N N m n N 0�vmirn mmm j�m�vmi� N C r-: N < QO N N o 0 OL- 'Q QO ~ Q 197T 0 -mV vo.� 'o 0000 000 O M � rna m 0 Obi N N� T N m p O C\! m mm m O rrnnmv `m,6 N N m m m m m C;w m m ° T N O m N mmm Qv <vm< rn C5 N m m_ O p� m O O o O � O M n m M N^ M O mmo o ao m p N N w a a m m o°2 m N N < N o m m< m vim mm °0�ym m m m O O m 0 O N N QNi NN ry m v rn 0 0 m a 0 N r N N m N m N m r N m mC6� n� on r mm m m Q Q Q N [Li m m m [p O O O rn m mm n rnm 0 0 O N d _ a o m m O mm O m m N Q N N m Y a mQm m rem ¢ m C v o N v m m N N O rn N QQ O1� N Q m QQmNQ m M Nr m �m pON n]!> 000 o po 0 o c 0 C LL O N , — N p N o 0M E c c o LL O 2 20 N YN ] O LL W L LL O N m O LL o > LL o a 2> S a> a=> m m C M N y T LL d a _L i y M .- M— M M m a m m N 'c}' gmammo mmmnN 3 O O F od O N ` O LO O gmmNNr NNmr < m E O N M co0OT ¢00000 00000 000 E O 0 9¢ 00 c ptMmmmo ��oNM .W"tM tt N v i a M LL- (nfn0- =w _ 2 m< M N - m N M m M M H a KN OMme- ONOM m M(nm J � M SM m O M M M N N N r 0 M � N Cc [C ¢ Q J¢O -000- � 9 Q M J O L O- O O- O O O N m O ¢ U W C 00Z 0mMMm OMmwO MMm L T m ' �% (c) N[ C � N m m m O U T co > M J N N N,6 0 U) =3 CCS Q m O c F L _ C U LL c6 N 6 C F- d a ¢ f O N y ONMONn M.-�m� MN4 J 2 N CO o a Y 3 O i M M m N N 0 M m N 0 4 J ��OO ppm� � cm Q W ¢O O.-oMa �-NO�v Mnm J m •- Q 0° d- Q O LO.-- ON O�NOM mmr O W t 2 a 0' F- C) Om L`c�� °c0o mn r: r N N L m N 0 v E m m NaNNO NmN U) O Q c m ca C: as e 0 G_ Q Q Q Q O ¢ Q Q G O O L N U tO�COJV~ O -M.. V O.O mo n 0 oo0 000 �Q~ O O O �UUU WMI. r A 0 06 O N O Ln O) O EOa cz00 ZU � ro co ca LL C/) U) IL U C N _ O cz O O .6 > m 0 2 m i N O -0 < m.= O U ll C 0 � i = N ca N R2 ( U _O U N ch ' fr O D cC (nNQZ c0 cd m c 6? o C c U O O �UUC 10-9 �y NOD NCO fO O�mm� N R F A O V N N m m N N M N N N o g ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 9 0 d ¢ ant00000 00000 000 U) 0 0 N ¢ m w 200000 00000 000 L O O F K O N N m N N N M N N o m N o oa a F m N Q ¢ i w Q O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O J p O D 2 OD m'o�00000 00000 000 0 0 W C ¢ J O OZ U X00000 OOOOO 000 00 ?m _ ¢ r O M �- V N O m N U) J O m O N .- O O N M M N O O m m O o � n ¢ ¢00000 00000 000 � p o0 v c v'oEOOOOO 00000 00 000 3200000 00000 000 00 r�ooNm MNoOm moo g o; bb 0-0—.N 00 -0— M n O a W¢ o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 D o c O J O c D O 2 ol OO � O O O O O O O O O O O O c w {5_ ¢ 0c J O OUN 2'000o 00000 00c 0c m Q KO�-O. -N 00� Or MOB U 0or �o`o`� 00OP sL' OEM aF Mo000 0 000 �Q c7 10-9 T yy �' smmmN O Orm� m tmO N n m j00 O N = _ N O SQ .N -O�NO— �O NOO N G0N rRNm mm mmmmm N N EooT N r r m 000, m o o 0 Or Cd 0 Q Z V c Z N L ONmm inr rr m inm 0 cl cz N� Q N - N N W 0,- LL U) U) CL �m W P NO r0 m rm m.-m N mN P-0 � m N N V m N V m m m JNV m(�!n �mm m m��l Fv °o�m o�van Como � fL I W ¢O m m O m m N m N N r N O O J E CO) F' m N N m O n N O O 7 W L r C 60 Z _ymnnc0 OHM- mNm L U_ �n m.m N N O N N N m M N N N (V m N M_ T > 1n 1 U m om N LL n m O m m � m m � m m N V n O <n QmN roomm 0 �% _ ANN NNW NN�-n mvr C� I Q m' O m�n n m m N N O m V M 0 L N �_Nrrrm U LL > C � � 0 ON--N minmr r nNr00 O m I n m N N m N 0 y S N ro m �¢ (D 9 r n n N d' O N_ N N r m N EdU) t_mN N N NEON C SAN¢ r Y d � 3 �rn0 �nnom vmin rvmo�� o r mWmo. r I am 0mw° m c _ � N N N N m N NN N O O N O Q I W oNMpmm mm m aW ovv,ry � r _ O c d' Qn°LmomnN nmo�n my m�q I J��rr r J O Cd O ON �n�nomo mrmmm mr�m Lo smmmmo nonm U me N N `"� rrrrr n N.-r r �m I d E m 0 (d Q, U NO V N m m Oin �T ii 0-0 ¢1 �aammm n��aN aNa U) N Q Z O cd m c aaa(L o aaaa o VL- U }� 0 FOp �c°+�a~ onm~ �S O O c y C CC� 000� o000 0 I O O � C) C) ) a mo m 0 m N N m m N m m V V n M d O o WON N m m N O o nN � N m r N N m r N mN� r mN r :2ta N.-m oin o�roo n �rjN p p prm0 0 o ro m C mO N r O N r Nm m nm C5 � m min �n m m in r � r O W O m N m o N mON N OmiN N N i a a m N n f m m m p O O lmp N N n m N 1 O p mm m m m A N N N m N N N N amr m a a m 0 my o� o� o 0 0 0 m N N Om O N N C; r O 0 oor o r eao m in uj N � a o n o v Nm o i N O m 00 n N ' 7i s� $ a ? r LL N o O w N m m E m m a m m O m N N vi r a ; v o a $p o do 0 ° c 0 E c E° 0 E o ° u E d E 0 I] U L 0 LL O L> L N LL� >°a >Y = >LL oa > °a = >y oro om ro =< m x c O a d N m a � $ m F-15- 7 00 ~ 06 O N = _ p 1 In p N Wln Wm vWr om of Eooa s! M aooT I O 00 ¢00000 00000 000 00 o ° m 0 9¢ W r i N f l O W I N N N O W W N 6,6 J m 1 roW � M N N NWm1� W N a � m N T _ r Q Q 1 W O O- o- N 0 0 0 0 0 "NO O J 0 a ¢ CD O L000� �' r' OHO N mm m O W L c: :j O (n N O Z> W W (V N W N f O m O 0; N N O O N t Y L T = m U N >� �mo W W m �n� W am poi vi O _ ce) m � Co 1 Q CO C i anlnWm W WmoN N C 0 U- 0 N c ¢ 1 i 0 Q. m ¢co -m o�Nln W �olri 0 m = N c6 ° ¢ N d.otamNN� mN�mm NNE Y) K m Y �' �mmN�m mNONI� W ma iE N o-00- a Sri o J r cc Q > 1 W OOH SON GNU] f�0?N J r J � ¢ O� o t o 0 0 0 0 O O N N O cli cr. m 1 U) J O � 0 0W �ammNN ��QN W Na?N I LO m O c0 d ¢ c o Wmmm� min u�mW 0� ai cc N Q Z U 0 co CO C N F a a as o as a n. o t �y U 'p 7 0! F 0 w 0 0 vab p a{- N C CU m0900 0000 Fd Q C7 1 O O C:UUU F-6 T od O N E O N ao0T Q) m 0 CO o Z Z U m a) a) c CO LL CO cn a U C c -6 >co O N m N O '06 Q m 'E 6 U LL N _ �0 m � L [1 d = N m (D T F E Y F— U T N U LL o'o R U)NQZ 0 BCD c y } C C C L O o.- SUUC ¢ N 3 =00000 00000 00c o< r0��0 N N -O- V (OOC J g; X000. -� 00000 _ 1-O 2 4 Q> W moo o o o o o o o o O pO J 0 7 ¢ O � ¢01=00000 00000 00 W t ¢ O J O 0 m = 00000 O O O Q O 00 U s o N m ¢ d000 -- 0000 U o im ao 0- (L o (L (L -0 oL O n V~ O- m V~ V Q N Q 0 0 0 0 O O O O b 1 i n e L`�- % C ip f f0Nao7N � � W (p OIN M M � V � a Q O O o o 0 0 0 0 00000 000 0 0 v¢ x 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O N ¢ ¢ w =00000 0 00000 0 000 L .K t tON V V cON . . -O(ONN y y((10.- �p S SON O m m 00000 m m I� o N N H O Q¢ W"0000 o o o o o o 0 0 O 0 0 J O ¢ O� m 00000 0 000 2aor00000 0 0 0 W L J � J O OZ U 0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 N _¢ F F O O N O m m p O O p 0 0 m 0 f, O J J 0 00 v J ry 0 0--ON C F F r r i N Q Q J O ¢ ¢ p p 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O C O O O C O C p t t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O C y6 i n e L`�- % EOO O N O O Eon ! C O O O N O ro o 0 Z ZVV a) ro U.- U) U) 0- I { F { U C i m O N C+") a! 0-0 ! Q m -= c 0 LL O C6 U O d = N cE0 N T ~ { c E Y � f y C C) a) ! O 06 N a) ! LO E Q °Qz C ` T O N C C U O O O U U (U a N N m c N ((VV m OOi (VN N� tOD � m �NNNO� m O1 0 m N� c^v lr�m m N N m m N m Q 0 0 O O J N N 7� NN °m n - N p t n N n N N M m N m n U, cN,) O W L ¢ O O J O O M J Z O O C Z U L mam(�ma m m m�mNn m m N N N No m n m N N O m O m v00000 000� �o A N M n V m m N m n M m F- 1 ¢ 1 1 i ¢�nrMNO nmNmm �L6 O m W ¢ -❑ 7 L N N t N M V M m n m N m n M m 0 ) J �O )Q Q ) (n N " � 1E 200o00 00000 000 I1 L O O 0 mmmnw ory N N � � A U L _ ry NO mmm O N m m O Nm ate- m M;,-ON n P. m m p M M M N N 7 O ¢00000 00000 ooc j o o c J ¢ a m n t 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O C m O c W ¢ J O ON U ` 2mrmom mmmmo mno Lmommn ommMv m N .rmnmmm mom- mot Jm��m E NNm tome o Q Q Q Q O <<<<-o f- ~ 0. O m O N O F- I- 21 mo_ o0 - a 0-0 aF M 0 0 0 0 O O O O Q C7 a M m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s O a N 00 m N 00 m n m O O O m m N m N m m mm coi Mm 0 0 0°0 O o0 0 0 0 O O O O 00 O O O O N L -OM o a o 0 Mmm vm) < Mm cmn Q v 200M Qm oa^oQm � N N N! m N 0 o 00 0 0 °E`cM EOSE° OOEmEEO 2 -5 h> a> W O)> W p °> a m> W d o m= m LL-¢¢ = m o = m a 0+/ L� / N N m N m m d O1 v m N� c^v lr�m m N N m m N m 0 0 O O N N NN N n - N m m N 000o Qo ao oo QO O O O M O M O O O O O M m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s O a N 00 m N 00 m n m O O O m m N m N m m mm coi Mm 0 0 0°0 O o0 0 0 0 O O O O 00 O O O O N L -OM o a o 0 Mmm vm) < Mm cmn Q v 200M Qm oa^oQm � N N N! m N 0 o 00 0 0 °E`cM EOSE° OOEmEEO 2 -5 h> a> W O)> W p °> a m> W d o m= m LL-¢¢ = m o = m a 0+/ L� / O O r O N i tn�O n C O r mmNm0N C2 n N (a 00 r N (a OQ Z Q 000000 00000 000 V O O I ro m fD �00-N 00000 "Mm O L V O ui J 0 J O OZ N € m N Cc M X 0000 0 0 000 4-1, 0 0 0 O O —M—OM mN N CJ � U Q C (n y ¢00000 '-- O— M mom N Or N i N CO L W ¢ U C� N > Ec O C`7 o cn- -oo -o.- 00000 -Mm co 71 d J O L 0-0 ZC ¢ O o o b? •� � �00000 000�.- °SON O O 00000 000�� o _.. c6 O O r t- N .. O O Z Q '00000 00000 000 ZU N o0 H O) ¢ ro C J U) (1) 0C M= L 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O o O ¢a- w_t¢ J 0 JZ O200000 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 O L 1(l ~ m ¢ �00000 000- .-00 m 00 J 00 -000000 O O O O O o O O O H a U C K O o 0 0 0 O O O O O O O Y m O K CO ( CW U m F?¢v cn= O o t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0 � �J ao _ co fn Co yam¢ y d O c Z 3 O � dQ 0 O y� � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C = F 00 O Q o O N E = N td T r�- .c000oo 00000 000 00 E Y ,00000 00000 0 0 .- o a 4 0 o 00000 00oo0 0o00 W � J 06 M r 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 000 ` Q a ¢ O O p w J J 0 co N U 20'000 O O O O O 000 O O U m F rG A p 06 f U �00000 00000 000 r LO 0 co 3 OO E d O 0 td (n N Q Z W22m a �i i2 m o 0 E �- Q Q Q Q o Q Q Q Q o o t id co C �CR-0 CRr In �.,, aa - i��i� mmcim } O NOOOO 0000 c7a ` C C U N > �UUU &1W W a I cd d C6 O N O O co E O a00r N N a) CO O p Z Z U r o N a) w 0 ii cn U) n. U C U > c7 O N m I N O Q O C U U- m a = N E cd � � H s E Y L I 0 co co C I w N w U N N LO I N CD co a CC O 'o cd (nNQZ p cd CO C N O O O �UUU 'nnrWN n�mmN v1pi 'm m°�m rNia �enim �N CO N � z [ m O O —1m N O O K m m o o [ N �m otn coo oWWmm� mm min 2 M W M M W O m v m N w a L W -1 Nn N —mmmm mmNm Nmv r o 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 � O O `N m� coven m M mm c N m v v N m N m N m m 0 W Ooi v m mm v mm 0 mf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on 0 ammo m m W m m amN c] 0 0 000 �o a0o�o 0 0 m 00 N O O O m r n W n N m� O O Imp � N N m (mp m N m N C m m O m 0 r m O N O 'M m M m N N mON m m Cl N N N N N dy' aN N 0 .0000 O 0 0 0 0 0 coo (7m C; O O O O o 0 0 00000 0 o o O O o 0 O O O Y O O -ommo o'mo� °o onto ) m N N N m N M N N N m y ] (p n n m V m— N f O N.- W 0_.- 0M M,4 OO N .A 0 0 L d EL o aaaa O o, N DmomF- o E UC E E N o W o�F- Eo c -m F- e Derma o,�7q�a, 0 ow F ;i ;i j T a f w m om o ] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q m a �/ a CS m m n N m d Ooi v m mm v mm 0 0 Win o o0 o 0 0 Onm o on 0 ammo m m W m m amN c] 000 �o a0o�o 0 0 m 00 N O O O m r n W n N m O O Imp � N N m (mp m N m m in m �m m mCj m m m 000 0 00 0 0 0 aN N 0 NO 0 N O � O (7m C; O 000 O 00 O O O 0 o o O 00 O O O O Y N N f W L v o v a 00 m Nmm m ccim m v m a�.WVW 20 off. -ova 0_.- 0M M,4 OO Oo o :v °o o 0 00 0 A C C N O Q ` U O o E C R V 7 � o E UC E E N $, Eo c -m E2 °Ymoy g>a >> °n > >d= s 0 ow i C o N o j T a a $ om o as x m � � m a �/ a mri`CiNq N�tOO'n m EC 0 0 0 r O N i LO 0000 _ CD ON Amro�t•m oNmm� a m EC) r o N N N 0 N D _. dO 0 F (SS 0 p Z CL 000000 00000 000 Z U -t (1) 00 1 a Cd CO Q Ol M ] t N 00 ON -000.- Mmu Cc ui 0 J O 0Z mH coo m N N N r W 0 m r cc t m m �00000 00000 00000 1 -N on Or 00.- V N 8 U a C ((7 W O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 coo o o m m RS (L6 0 t W > m> 0oto. -oo.- 00000 (d A QCO .0 NQyQ N L = (n y v LL v Q tam 2 00000 O O O O O 000 C m O O L O E m 7 2 N � o j � n 9 E Y T m o m o N m y m m m a N N Q O O O O O O O O O O O O 60 t W 6 J 0 O C mo=00000 00000 000 L QaQ o0 o co Om w U 2 0l N W m r m a m m m OO O N N o O C O N t L O O N 00000 00000 000 r N 'n5 00 C 4 t CC O 6 cC (nNQZ��im m doe an.aao aaaao otp �oino�l- 0 Rf CO aF- U D = m�g$o 0000 TQ O y Iy O CD O > > t + O O .- �UUU C, ' /57 c •io �y00000 00000 0 E 0 0 O N 0 O co EO -- m0000o 00000 0 noon a� (D ¢ Z0 o 0 Q Z Q oOOOOO 00000 000 i O O c J ¢ L Co CL Q M o t 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O O O cc Wc¢ i J � J O OZ- 200000 0 0 0 0 0 00 O H I m z00000 00000 00 J � i m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ¢ C 000000 00000 000 .4 c W ¢ (6 M (D O NN �6v W= o o L o o 0 o o 00 o O o 0 0 (d O Q J O t 2 I Q m 'C N y N O CZ C— N emu' yg 200000 00000 00 c F- N _ I o � 0 Q o = N (Ed U j,r F— =0000O oOOOO 00 J O E Y $00000 00000 0 F I a 0 >Q> 000000 00000 000 I W ¢ J 0a m t 0 0 0 o 0 00000 O O L (L 0 - O I Q W t 2 J J O •ro o w (A U FO0000 00000 00 c � o O T N ?C/) 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 00 O I (li Cc 0-0 cz (n N Q Z n222�§ o aaaao .. CL: ot2 � 0 O �m o c a oa No0�o � c c f Q) > + O 0.— C:UUU F-/& co u cn co a. 3 I j I U C T U > (7 O M 0-0 Q CO •c O L O lY N LL. �~ a = N N C Y 6. 1 I N U W cc I m v FL U T U) a> o 70 m cnNQZ T i cz m c 41) o C C U 0 O :UUU Nv O 0000 00000 000 00 N r O n 00010 Oo0010 Ooo 613 ann�ov y�inmmm� w � NNWyMno rncpmom (D 0 O O F[ON O NN mm- N m � O N - OON � M •-� � <O mtON T o 0 O O m o Eoa m E 0 m o t- Z U Q co u cn co a. 3 I j I U C T U > (7 O M 0-0 Q CO •c O L O lY N LL. �~ a = N N C Y 6. 1 I N U W cc I m v FL U T U) a> o 70 m cnNQZ T i cz m c 41) o C C U 0 O :UUU Nv O 0000 00000 000 00 N r O n 00010 Oo0010 Ooo 613 ann�ov voomN mvo nv. -�nm rncpmom moi ri NNM N O NN mm- N m � OON � M •-� � <O mtON 0 O O m r.- mMOnM v o O (O N m mO r mvv� mmmma N m M a mIN umi�mm mrvmn 0t,: m m vm�n mmme�M NN O m m O N N V m N M O O g�kq g� ro mo 12 16 oo ot- �m� o�Omv~ ~Eo v ¢F 000 0000 roQ m o m m ° m m a N M O O ¢ m y O Q o Q vQ o¢ 0 o 0 20 o ¢r d. o 4 E cc E t S E t o 0 E o= E «2 >0 0 °'> u" 0 a> a m> LL N 0 w m E¢ = m no 0 rd d im a 0 0 0 T m N CL 1 - is � N 0 m 0 o d r m N N O r W � V 000 0 00 0 0 0 tp r (6N Q �Q QM N O O V O m r O O O m m o mo m m N M m 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0 n M r r m N 0 �mm m M m mON QN QOO¢�- O O 0 M O M O O O o n rr r�o m v2 :t v m umi e O O mry v eu a N _: N m o m m ° m m a N M O O ¢ m y O Q o Q vQ o¢ 0 o 0 20 o ¢r d. o 4 E cc E t S E t o 0 E o= E «2 >0 0 °'> u" 0 a> a m> LL N 0 w m E¢ = m no 0 rd d im a 0 0 0 T m N CL 1 - is lQOmNI() W Nfi (D V' N a 0 0 0 F O N LO LO O O E °oa co O O N O I ~ CO O Q Z Q ZU� m co > ;00000 000.-r rON Il U) U) a. ¢ ¢ OO � 9 Y W O ¢ Q 02200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W F a0 W 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J -a 00�m� tO F � N f U ¢ C I "00) 0 r00000 00000 oo0 V c>6 m m v ¢ ON C7 > N mm n° I Q M � S¢rp 2fnorm m oNo Nrn O v Z� rr �mN 6 0 LL^ d C d N 2 x 0 0 0 0 0 O O O r r x 0 0 I =o m o J r 1 000r.- ooNON mono I o S 0 ma Y ¢ t I N v1�2�omr�n fnmfnmr Nm.= NFmNVVV mvmNa °�mn U O) U N .c00000 00000 oo0 9 w w_ 0 0 °6 1� U T U) a 0) v E 2 CC O a (iS O O n D F o L a U) N ter; n6n 0000 c n Fwo Ocz m C o000 0000 �¢ } 10 O U I o o C) (0)(0) (T O NO O) o O E o z� r000T C m M O p Z ZUt�(D a) m m m lL Cn (n 0- U C i vco > (Y O co o� d Q (Yl •c r L 0 C U LL C � � a ! _ °° C\j cu E T d— I Y U a� ! co LLJ 06 h U T N h i E a) (nNQZ C co 7 p c6 m C U i N O N C C U i O O �UUU o N--Mn O ONN�W � �1 N -@00000 O O O O O O 0 O a w > E E00000 0 00000 0 00.0 00 09 W w o c� 02200000 0 o O o o o coo w ww 0 00 QJ W X 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 J J O O O p O O O— O— O O O O O O O n F- �00000 0 00000 o oo0 0 0 3 � iwn uV1 p 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 _ Z L L O O O n 00000 .- O n J o oam �pN�O C C�(O O ONN V OJ O C. o U U !�,000o 0 00000 Ooc o c _ o v¢ a ma fL o O c U) 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 .c�N�oroO O ONNaw roc J i 9 /3-/0 Co 3 /r &! ©/ E§r 0 ci G§& C5 a 0}2 !; !a/!; � { 2 2 ± „ r ,! m ; CLO 0 :x» );;w2> - /7 {_ ci \ \ /�\ � k ��) \&®( «f) E ! I Co e p ®)J \ / Lu \\$ 5 /t -! :0000_ 00000 :SS \` 6 \ G 2 / \\ ® e/ \» /\ in I@7E em <z 0 {\\ƒ s, MP O,::/ @:: §gg/ EGWg4 §2\ !!!# !!!!# # ®® ci C5 a 0}2 !; !a/!; { 2 2 ± ,_:_0_ :x» 2;% - /7 {_ \ � k ��) \&®( ( )§ \ / 9 \\$ 5 -! a2° \` \ ) / ) ! „�,2 �_, :, R:m E 0\ ( �( ) _ \ QE\\® 6 \ G 2 / \\ ® e/ \» /\ in I@7E em <z 0 {\\ƒ s, MP O,::/ @:: §gg/ EGWg4 §2\ !!!# !!!!# # ®® !46 5 \ \6 / ! ^»` !` D!^»! ! ! }! ! t`t!(#t|# girt»(# aa .222 =2w 2� -! f> oom 0 ƒ L> 0 5`e C5 a 0}2 !; !a/!; 9 \\$ 5 /\ a2° \` 0\ ( �( ) !46 5 \ \6 / ! ^»` !` D!^»! ! ! }! ! t`t!(#t|# girt»(# aa .222 =2w 2� -! f> oom 0 ƒ L> 0 5`e U It co O N O NO O O Eoa aO o o ZU Z CO LLWcna U C N-O Q1 U O am c� co O p QM LJ .0 O O LL F— ca d L N N y C, Y d N L U m � U � W � _ od F C) r N c N 0� O-0 cd (n NQZ o`mm c a? ro o c c U N C 0 E000 nova mooma m Cn V N� N Cn N N O N Oo.-.- 000 oo v 0 oo- - 00000 .-0a 8° 0000 0 0 0 0 0 000 00 00010 000010 000 66 O N NIT m � m TIN (O n L 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o O O No 0 ao.a o O O _ 1O O N 0000 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 00 080 0 -mN mc�mT� TTry Z .c2TOT M n— m NN-- F— w 000 �- O•-00� N —N r O nT mm Nmn nC� N � N 00010 000010 OOO 66 n T i f l }2 N m n n N m O N No 0 ao.a o VV mo C6 1O O N 0000 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 00 :5; }2 2222- No 0 ao.a o 0- 0.0. a 1O oomon Con a~ 080 c� LF -9 a U C N W "a O T N O ¢m D C U O O O = N N T E_ Iz V) O N O LO O E O N CLO O� a) N a) N o Z Z C) a) r c Cd 'u= U) cn a O O co co O LL O CL E co H C) S' ct Lu N U ._ U LO *- N O O 0 0.. co N Q Z C 0 O m ( C % a) O � cU N 0 C .— E000 Z' -/D N mn.-•-N ANN O0 r GF 0 0 �00000 00000 0 0 F- w > t 0 0 0 O 0 O0000 O O O 00 o Y9 W p W Q 0 0m2000o0 00000 000 W W 0 0 0 W r00000 00000 000 J O O �o 0000 000.- � m o m 4 1=0000o 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 )mom Q X00200000 00000 000 Z F 0 i 3 00000 000.- morn J ow m n N -- N O O ( O 7 m r00000 00000 Doc cc c rnn OD0200000 00000 00C nF oc v m n N .- - N O V m0- l0c an�.aa o o` a¢. IL IL oo -M ~ �aF, 'a ONMY�,~ F rb 0000 m�' 0000 O Z' -/D C 0 Oro Or OO /0- ��tNmON CNNNN O N E O r F.NNNmO NNNNm m ro 0 0 I E�. O m0� V Nmm Nm V mN Nmm m o p Z O U C @'C m d.ot.- inmNCO nmNmm mom N m N CO ro _ N O Vi U) 7 W . M _ m m a m m m E N n � `-m -NNN F-.-N NNT N Nmm d N N N N m ON N N N O m 0 4 .-N m Nm mN m`tM N N Q. -OOmQ NNmnN N'a m0 O N � F- E o � W c () W C¢ C vU o O¢Z O O � N m N N a ' U > (rj v V N n N N� N O N N N O 0 co ro � 0-0 a Q CL PI - L°. -m�mN rnv vo N o .:7D U > F N N N m N N NM r y ` @ m 4 I O O- cc O N m N r- V V m N N O 2 c� ro m s J r F c C@ a of rn o m N m m V N m N m a G C N ¢ r {E a m =m<ON ONNn NNmmNm NNN O F N N r m N N N ro N N n St mm I I . N t O n m n N N IN m V 0 J N N V N tf g V O n N o n m O 1 D «O i V N V Ol V V N n N a F- Q O N T O mN m m M N N �j N m N Way N p> popmoemo nmNmv drN m'° m N N W :F ¢ ro J 0 ZN 20mmmn mmm�.- mmm C-6 N N Q �dE� co (n 0 "0 cd J��N�� NNNNO m�ON m N M m Z) cV QZ .._. C L: C� � Ei� @ 1 C Q Q Q Q o Q Q Q Q o o t- Ui''O = ro�mv�,~ cpT 0(n ano N l�nrn III O CL V) G C U 0000 0 0 0 0 Q D CD 1 cC)UC) N N � N m 0 O co N O r 0 m m m O m m 6 0 mNm m vm m (V N NN MIN N m I N N m m m N mm N N N I cd N N of V O O O 0 0 v m m N N n r mom oo N N N m O N O N O O N[ V V N I m m NMO a o 0 N N N OI m N m O � NnN m �o m N m mN N S O N N m m N m.-m �N aN V NN N r o N N Tw O O O m O 1O N r[m0 I N n O � O m n p O N m N � N � N _ N a �o N N Q N m N a � g mvm m ro a n vai N � O m V m 2 oQ �.nN Qm QooNQN N Ohm rN ¢� mn pia "'m 000 0 00 0 Etm�.:mo o' � U t ILL O? L? m of >m >,= >� on >d2 >� Y .E a d a � O��am a a w v t 00 O N U) O m E O C Q T (6007 N U N E o DS z iLcncna A d II U C N 6 > cr) 02 co U N 7 co N O m c _..� 0 LL 6 O C � � ii = N co N Y /, it G U N co i ~ f` y (n O 'o cc N Q Z C ` C C L N 7 + O O ._ CUUL' i tl J 6 _CI aMtO�nua vn�nmin M mmmN o N E �, N O l V 00 � O! m W p 5 ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V O O a¢ a p t N O O O N M-- co �ro W =voNmN ` —N Om maw z o o N O N O o o- - wO C�NN �MNCO I� O N I- o m Q ¢oOO�T N��NO ^N(V � N W 9 ¢ � OtO�V �tD NNOO� 00(D W 0 U o ¢Z 00- r O u � S a l q C> MN J N 'v v � � F d m L Q � o M� o a � :Or 0000o 00000 000 m�¢ 00 3 zrvl L -rm nvm. -� �^t\ MN J Q7 N qN Min tO CD NMmNO N O o a O Q ¢ -min o0 -0.- m71 Q oo- N W 9 ¢ c � O t O O N O N O m i[ l N tt m L C I tm c7 0 Z 200000 --No -v v t. Q L H Nmm Cl -00- 'N -Mc �2w Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q Q 0wO ~ O0 CO1 d V~ O V Ml 00l goon roof 0000 O i tl J 6 _CI { 9 ei OO rd O N O O E0 W 0 0 T O N wp0 Z ZUt� am Q) CO LLcnina i c5 C N i v > m E o m co N 0 Q m 0 I 1 O 7 U0 LL [ CF- (:) ro i a ti N ro �T N E Y m �C C O i ro F H 0 T =nom ro D N Q Z C - o cd rom C: } O ` C_ C O 0 . �U UU <<< Q Q <<<<o om0 o m6 O c 0000b 0 w F $ L ¢F 9 io-o�.2 jy N N�-COn d d Nm V m m N F C 0 O N F- ¢00000 0 00000 0 000 0 0 00 a¢ C y p t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O O m � D O � ¢ ¢ D W- 200000 O O O O O O o O 0 € 0 00 J O N �y00000 . . 000 � � � O O H Q ¢00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O � O O O W� Q L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O O O O W0 UZ ¢ 2 200000 0 00000 0 000 a € € d do r X00000 r r-Oo J O O Lo O 1 � ��. - -NOR N Nam R O O a O - 0 0 0 0 o ¢ ¢ ¢00000 0 00000 0 000 y 0 0 0 0 0 U C a'o = =00000 0 00000 0 000 00 3200o00 0 00000 0 000 L O O O 1- K N N O B B N- m R O O R O O O O on 00000 0 00000 o o O 0 F O < < ¢00000 0 00000 0 0 j ¢ 0 0 00 LL1 ¢ ¢ J V 0 O t t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 o O O m L 00 ZN 2 200000 0 00000 0 00C 0c dO0000 0 00000 0 00C � O OC io-o�.2 w O N O O E°o� aooT N N CO0QroZ Z U C (D Co LL U) Cf) CL E 11 I U C C5 CD T U > c) (1) NCo 0-0 O U LL a N C 0 � !I = N N 1111 �rr T '— C Y tl �I �) m E F I ' C U N U F— U 06 fn N i 2 o co CL II ° � az .t_.. C) N. m c N O ` C C U U 7 C C U U xc °o. a mm n U o y a LL /1 h L- -CCU mm�e+}1 N- O OnMf� mm C C rrilmN N F m m m M mFIN r M m N F m c p m M N a p i°�N°�(1umOa�� N NrCnNo M MmMNM N FMmlhm d d' M N m M MOW n n MNO Q Q m mmm m m r M F O ¢ ¢ � D >_ � mANNVN O N Nmmwo v mm m v mw ��t m NN m m m N> ¢ ¢ v (- W W W m m �n C ° y a 1L- [ mmw m : MMNN N NO, � a a �m�oNm � �} Mmmm M MN- = = m mr�m om om`1.o J C C a a m m d N uj m O O O ANmO)a M M mMm"w M M m m M M N mw m m� N Oo N m ¢ ¢ ¢ V MmmN N NO-N7 M M] m N O� M Nm M 0 V m O � 0 N � 0 ¢ ¢9 .Qo o V V wa0 ' 'QNNNO 0 0n0 oav v oM v ,N nOt V o U U Z 12Z m mmomm � �rmm�n o oc; 1 " "mMwN m m Nmm� N N mN M r r m mO mN u7 mNO'm NMNN O O MNN -O 0 0 C1 co � �- _ N > m mnOm m mNN�m n n v? N co_ MMMNN N NNNN O O N M I I- O O O F. M u ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < <m.-M� m mmmMm N Nvv1 ¢ ¢o • •- a C C N OMn V N N O.-m y C � N m v m N m ` N N O Q Q V), m m ` , w wNnm N Nam m 3 mam N M,4 of --NNNN r r NN NN O O NmM � �- m m �m m m a m n n N n N N N M m o om p.- o �°1� o: m n njp J J M M O NM J n O O w w 5 O O .bowman a am w- w 5 c cno °m mm mm ommrnmm m mmm�N o o F F M M m m m F 0 0 0 o < < o o ¢ ¢ o ¢ o -m n nONmm C Cl n 0 0 m mNrn m mN m G O ONNN - N N N O O) N N n N cj > > O N N > p C `o O"- w t . w O m N N m m 0 M Mom Q Q O E E N N w 0l w N w m m n t .- O 0 N W W O W j m m O J �M w n v m w w M N m z z Q ? m m M n m 0 � Q ? ` ~ N Nj N N N N n N N N m N M m N 0 N ON N m O 29-M 0 O p O N Ei ii m m 2 2 2 r ro mo o 0 0 V aaaa o o MCL Ca � F N et c O O O H OO m OM �V (1 � ea« M- O N o> Ls L ~ O m N e y y E V1 O oo o o 0000 o E L- -CCU -1I I o °O � O N O O E O r 0-00— W o p Z ZUt�m u. mina d m 1 Z j co O N m (n O .0 1 p L O C U U- co O C R% o ° E = N cd E Y �I �I �I �I w, H i l r m C U (D m H H U 021 rn rn a� �0caa U) 0 -0 cu �NQZ C O (D a) 0 0 0 �UUU C- - oz � =�mm °m oe°'i�mNCVV f- c n m � fy'mom� rrvvN o m t- 2O r-00� 00000 •- V N a �o y O -SON 0000 N1 - � $Q CV r ro w RMWMNN rrvvN M -oi m m E N O O- m 00000 m m� J � � ��.vom moo. -v o m o I- 'n 200000 -000- -OM 0 Q O O w� Q F- O L O O N O N 0 0 0 0 0 N0- U) O� W C _ ¢ N (J Z � 00 0- 00 -N a o � i � m Oro -000 - � O fV 1 6mmrma omrm om 1 v > 200000 0oo0o 000 O o 0 m 7 qt o.-oo� 00000 --Lq o 3 tON m mm 00 [OmN m mm ? (V X100 m O� N-N� -m r 01 o m F- 0 N O O m -0-ON N a m j O m N N W � J o ca L O O N 000-- m ro- nO m -- _Q zN2 -Ovcm ---co m�N a a' F' =-000- 00000 - m V a. (Liim �fLii to C moa �aaaao aaaao oc� 0000Q 0 C- - oz J m lr 11 ca C,d 00 0 10 N 0 O O E o N ac) OT Y (600Z ZUt: Cl) O (z N IL U) Cl) r� U C Cr- n (U � U CO > Ch O ce) n 0-0 ! � Q CYi •C � U E ~ a 2 N co T f— Q) E �I Y f' C C 'D : �y0 co NO rNr N a1 C co U y- (U F- 0 U 06 -lot co N W (I r000r �NQZ sorrrM Q (d m U 0 { � O O N C C U d) 0 !! �UUU i i r�22 �y0 V I�NM NO rNr N C v r000r sorrrM 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 9 Q apt00000 00000 000 U�¢ 00 W 200000 00000 000 L O O F- . O --- M -000- o 0 n O r O O O g O O O O O O O O O O o F Q Q O O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 000 0 Q 66 W� 7 HoiOOOOO 00000 oOo N � 0 0 WC¢ _ _U0 200000 00000 000 O € 0 0 �OoOoo 00000 000 � O O J AoMmro aorv>o o M N = o m o 0 > 00000 ooO oo0000 00 9 O L O O O O O O O O O O -0- Q O O :D 200000 00oo0 000 t o0 F- .s=OMW -o ao-00 00M N99 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O t- o a ¢000000 00000 00oc J 9 D OaOr00000 00000 ooc mt� cc ° 0 n Z 2c 00000 00000 oo Q F oc .,6,0000 Q ~ 00000 ooc J m� Oc _o 0 ot; ONO �O� mom 000 N� �0 OrM tiON 0000 000 00000 co.F �¢ U i i r�22 Start Date 313/2005 Start Time 7:00 Site Code 2132 Total Vehicles ISLE OF CAPRI BLVD- - Street Name SR 951 -- Southbound SR 951 -- Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru App Thru Left App Right Left App I/S 7:00 2 244 246 256 15 271 12 14 26 543 7:15 5 284 289 274 12 286 9 15 24 599 7:30 II 357 368 256 14 270 II IS 26 664 7:45 12 332 344 286 16 302 27 12 39 685 Vol 30 1,217 1,247 1,072 57 1,129 59 56 115 2,491 PHF 0.63 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.89 0.93 0.55 0.93 0.74 0.91 8:00 12 321 333 245 18 263 21 30 51 647 8115 - 10 301 311 265 12 277 17 17 34 622 8:30 19 284 303 248 11 259 10 23 33 595 8:45 15 292 307 256 10 266 26 19 45 618 Vol 56 1,198 1,254 1,014 SI 1,065 74 89 163 2,482 PHF 0.74 0.93 0.94 0.96 0.71 0.96 0.71 0.74 0.80 0.96 16:00 6 268 274 386 20 406 10 12 22 702 16:15 8 296 304 370 17 387 11 8 19 710 16:30 9 312 321 336 21 357 12 14 26 704 16:45 4 318 322 336 27 363 15 13 28 713 Vol 27 1,194 1,221 1,428 85 1,513 48 47 95 2,829 PHF 0.75 0.94 0.95 0.92 0.79 0.93 0.80 0.84 0.85 0.99 17:00 5 298 303 326 20 346 16 12 28 677 17:15 4 315 319 371 10 381 17 11 28 728 17:30 7 345 352 353 13 366 15 14 29 747 17:45 8 356 364 388 19 407 24 16 40 811 Vol 24 1,314 1,338 1,438 62 1,500 72 53 125 2,963 PHF 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.78 0.92 0.75 0.83 0.78 0.91 Start Date 31312005 Start Time 7:00 Site Code 2132 Trucks Only ISLE OF CAPRI BLVD- - Street Name SR 951 -- Southbound SR 951 -- Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru App Thru Lek App Right Lek App I/S 7:00 I 17 IS 12 6 20 I - 1 7:15 2 18 20 II 9 20 - - - 7:30 1 22 23 10 5 15 - - - 7:45 2 14 16 8 4 12 2 - 2 6 71 77 41 26 67 3 - 3 8:00 - 20 20 9 6 15 - I 1 8:15 1 25 26 11 4 15 - I 1 8:30 2 18 20 13 8 21 - 4 4 8:45 I 22 23 14 4 18 - - - 4 85 89 47 22 69 6 6 16:00 1 15 16 17 2 19 1 - 1 16:15 - 12 12 12 1 13 - - - 16:30 1 II 12 20 5 25 - 2 2 16:45 - 10 10 8 2 10 2 - 2 2 48 SO S7 10 67 3 2 5 17:00 - 14 14 9 3 12 1 1 2 17:15 2 15 17 9 2 11 - - - 17:30 - 12 12 4 4 8 1 1 2 17:45 - II II 7 1 8 - - - 2 52 S4 29 10 39 2 2 4 147 164 122 97 Start Date 3/3/2005 Start Time 7:00 Site Code 2132 Truck Percentage ISLE OF CAPRI BLVD- - Street Name SR 951 -- Southbound SR 951 -- Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru App Thru Left App Right Left App I/S 7:00 50% 7% 7% 5% 53% 7% 8% 0% 4% 7:15 40% 6% 7% 4% 75% 7% 0% 0% 0% 7:30 9% 6% 6% 4% 36% 6% 0% 0% 0% 7:45 17% 4% 5% 3% 25% 4% 7% 0% 5% 20% 6% 6% 4% 46% 6% 5% 0% 3% .6% 8:00 0% 6% 6% 4% 33% 6% 0% 3% 2% 8:15 10% 8% 8% 4% 33% 5% 0% 6% 3% 8:30 11% 6% 7% 5% 73% 8% 0% 17% 12% 8:45 7% 8% 7% 5% 40% 7% 0% 0% 0% 7% 7% 7% 5% 43% 6% 0% 7% 4% 7% 16:00 17% 6% 6% 4% 10% 5% 10% 0% 5% 16:15 0% 4% 4% 3% 6% 3% 0% 0% 0% 16:30 11% 4% 4% 6% 24% 7% 0% 14% 8% 16:45 0% 3% 3% 2% 7% 3% 13% 0% 7% 7% 4% 4% 4% 12% 4% 6% 4% 5% 4% 17:00 0% 5% 5% 3% 15% 3% 6% 8% 7% 17:15 50% 5% 5% 2% 20% 3% 0% 0% 0% 17:30 0% 3% 3% 1% 31% 2% 7% 7% 7% 17:45 0% 3% 3% 2% 5% 2% 0% 0% 0% 8% 4% 4% 2% 16% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Background Traffic 1: US41 & CR 951 Stone Len k 500 wu a43 - - - -- ._ — ,,. .,. .ft en en 4n 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume v h 261 411 799 !V 336 Lei o» '- __. .._ ...,. „ ne-r "I onv iIu it 161 880 2S4 7`^..;('Y }'eft +`el +ten D Approach • 1. u n Area e: Other Actuated ,cl 715%7774- . •sr"t.; .:?s Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/192006 I:\Projects \808\ 80874 \Tn ic\Synchro\PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Total Traffic I: US41 F. CR 9S I Stone Len h ft 5uu Gov 111111111 21111111 an en 4n 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Group Flow (Y ph) 284 54U unr » >ev -- - a 7 4 Approach • Area1 rr i2 {, ,t,1 e�reFi � � � •� � . Type: • - .w . -<. ., , Actuated Cycle �enjjt 120 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/19/2006 I: \Proiem \808\80874 \Traffic \Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Dayfor, LLP Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Total Traffic 4: RI /R0 Access & CR 951 1 t 1 Grade °76 "'° not n0'1 FZ i fl 4F � 5 -- 1 - Y1=Flt - 0. NIirI "iC-2. S 1 't - - 17�r,y.ns�Y .airn ,. r.,ak., .r 7s ;�,t4 j" 64. 1 11 11 11 11 11 ✓LS..d._w. -,. :Yne,_r. FE.�. d,- :_,:. r�kSh »r �i��h �...�.: „fa l ,`- "� �s. .: fl �'f�i zn .a,r _: ?.att. � �t�s v.., :� t t:.. ,:< Approach LOS r Avemg Del 4.4 , a TGiG. nalysis Period (m 'I- Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/1912006 1: \Projects\ 808\ 80874 \TraRic\Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 (6 Lane Divided) 4: RI RO Access & CR 951 PM To al Traffic r t Approach LOS D Milli 11 =11 1 0 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/19/2006 I: \Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Traffic\Synchro \PMTOTAL_6Lsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP u 7., SH e Approach LOS D Milli 11 =11 1 0 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/19/2006 I: \Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Traffic\Synchro \PMTOTAL_6Lsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Tamiami Crossing US411SR951 PM Background Traffic 5: Ea pie Creek Drive & CR 951 l ")v '- t `\ t /' 1 d 4016 con(vol v vCu unblocked vol 4458 6121 981 4436 6127 202 1984 2153 Volume Lek 0 0 58 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 cSH 249 433 649 1700 1700 1700 596 1700 1700 1700 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/182006 I: \Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Tmf ic\Synchro \PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor. LLP HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Tamiami Crossing US411SR951 5: Eagle Creek Drive & CR 951 PM Total Traffic vC I sure I conf vol 0 vCu unblocked vol 5123 7199 1005 5100 7028 0 2033 2452 3.1 3.1 tC 2 stage LsL 0 ueue (ree 11MR1001101 100 100 1@101 51 1110: 100 100 65 87 95 Volume Leh il 0 0 Will 84 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 cSH 239 511 645 1700 1700 1700 581 1700 1700 1700 Approach LOS D U Synchro 6 Report NG - 7119[2006 I:\ Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Traffic\Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Synchro 6 Report NG - 711812006 1: \Projects\ 808\ 808 74 \Tmffic\Synchro \PMTOTAL_6Lsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Background Traffic I5: South Wal Mart Dri ewa & CR 951 ,(- 4" t ti l Sto a Length k 0 145 t4u 9Ru Satd. Flow erm 3433 IStl3 AdY uno synu »» Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/18/2006 I: \Proje \ 808 \80874 \TmffidSynchro\PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP YX v � ,, ua • " 'z „�. i- :i#:,Y �. xr,.r PR 't,` .} °Cis;'= ,J,.' r .r._ =i .. •] • _•, i�{'t 11 11 11 11 11 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/18/2006 I: \Proje \ 808 \80874 \TmffidSynchro\PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP YX Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/18/2006 I: \Proje \ 808 \80874 \TmffidSynchro\PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Total 15: South Wall Mart Driveway & CR 951 Traffic '(- t T Storage Len h ft 0 145 cYU „v Total Lost Time s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Satd. Flow erm 3433 1563 35 -9 IStl.1 a +n� aan Volume v h 525 265 MY---- 346 oLU iyav Lane Grou Flow v h 571 288 1966 378 565 1564 Protected Phases B 8 2 1 6 Total S lit s I i 25.0 25.0 71.0 71.0 24.0 95.0 II 111i Actuated JC Ratio 1 1111 0.18 0.18 0.56. 0.56 0.17 0.76 Dili Uniform Delay, d 1 49.0 6.8 26.3 3.9 49.9 6.3 ueue Del a 15.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS F B D A F A Approach LOS E D C Synchro 6 Report NG - 7119/2006 I: \Prolects\ 808\ 808741Tmffic\Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 (6 Lane Divided) PM Total Trafric 15: South Wal Mart Driveway & CR 951 't 1 P ,• • 1 1 s sr 1S 4.F, i; - Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report NG - 711912006 I: \Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Traffic\Synchro \PMTOTAL_6Lsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP 9 'a -; - 9 ri'E: 2 ..I.fl h< ] '� . 9'y, i„ )6q. r�.�f +f .• C ry .3 � • aD. ^- f, • -{ Yt-4 t a:: .�a�o.'�i^ f`i.,�.,5"YOtI i'*�ic .'t2�w 1 ,}` .*i. r - tl Y [i "e y P w 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 • • 1 :Y, 11 `YAP 11 11 YV 11 •..p 11 r44n � .r(. • eK •r v .. I�d7.. • . 3f�;} X7.1 zy,.. p <C.^ a Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report NG - 711912006 I: \Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Traffic\Synchro \PMTOTAL_6Lsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US411SR951 6: Manatee Road & CR 95 1 PM Background Traffic t Satd. Flow 11roi 1770 1583 353Y Ibui liiv »>7 Satd. Flow erm 1770 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Volume (2h) 146 284 - 1685 70 tib ub7 Lane -G uj Flow v h 111159 309 118321,111, 76 300 1705 Protected Phases 11 8 2 1 6 MIIIIII Total S lit s 20.0 20.0 71.0 71.0 29.0 100.0 Actuated IC Ratio Milli 0.12 0.12 0.58 0.58 0.19 0.81 Uniform Dela dl 50.2 0.6 21.2 4.4 46.3 4.1 ueue Dela 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 LOS E B C A E A Approach LOS C C B Synchro 6 Report NG - 711812006 I: \Projects\ 8081 80874 \Tmffic\Synchro\PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US4IISR951 PM Total Traffic 6 Manatee Road & CR 951 ( t 1 1 Total Lost Times 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.v +.w Satd. Flow erm 1770 1583 353y lilioa uiv »>> MI, Volume v h iiIiIIIII 318 IM iv niv Lane GrOto Flow (Y ph) 159 346 1925 76 337 1798 Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 Total S lit s 20.0 20.0 72.0 72.0 28.0 100.0 Actuated C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.58 0.58 0.20 0.81 Uniform Delay, d I 50.2 7.4 23.2 4.7 46.7 4.3 ueue Dela 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.1 LOS E C C A F A Approach LOS C C C Synchro 6 Report NG - 7118[2006 1:\ Projects \808\80874 \Tragic \Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 91 Fiddlers Creek Parkway & CR 951 PM Background Traffic � k' Total Lost Times 4.0 EMINIII 11 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Trailin Detector k 0 0 0 0 0 Satd. Flow rot 1678 0 3539 1583 1770 3539 Satd. Flow erm 1678 0 3539 1583 1770 3539 Volume v h 150 225 1584 125 486 lily Lane GrQUD Flow v h 408 0 1722 136 S28 1336 Protected Phases B 2 1 6 Total SDlit s 26.0 0.0 58.0 58.0 36.0 94.0 Actuated i C Ratio 0.18 0.45 OAS 0.27 0.75 Uniform Dela dl 41.4 33.0 2.8 44.0 6.0 ueue Dela 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.1 LOS F F A F A Approach LOS F E D Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/1812006 1:\Projects\ 808 \80874 \Tmffic\Synchro \PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Total Traffic 9' Fiddlers Creek Parkway & CR 95 t Milli 11,11,1111-lini -- I Satd. Flow 11,111676 u a»v ...' Said. Flow (BYOB) 60 109 Lane Grou Flow v h 426 u trio uo Protected Phases 8 2 I 6 0,0 57.0 Total S lit 1,1=111 I III low 27.0 57.0 36.0 93.0 Uniform Dela d I 40.6 33.5 3.8 44.0 6.6 11 11 111 ueue Del a 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.1 LOS F F A F A Approach LOS F F D Synchro 6 Report NG • 7/1812006 I:\ Projects\ 808\ 80874\Traffic\Synchro\PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor. LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Background T B: US 41 & Triangle Boulevard Traffic Protected Phases 7 4— 3 8 5 2 I 6 ._ - ..... 1.,. — Al n an 111 1) n Approach LOS C D D Area T e: Other Actuated Cycle Len :118.1 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/16/2006 1:%Proje %808\ 80874 \Tmffic\Synchro \PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US411SR951 PM Total Traffic B: US41 & Triangle Boulevard Stora I a Len k 1.11356 +La jj� - ._ .A en an an 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 Approach LOS t' `" WIN Synchro 6 Report NG - 711812006 I:\Proiects\ 808\ 80874\Tmffic'Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR9S1 PM Total Traffic 2: US41 & West Access Approach LOS Averse Dela 0.5 Analyst's Period min IS I MINE Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/1912006 I: \Proleccc\808\ 80814 \Traf8c\Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Re9,e —e ,C.la kCl, -(6,, 11 11 11 Approach LOS Averse Dela 0.5 Analyst's Period min IS I MINE Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/1912006 I: \Proleccc\808\ 80814 \Traf8c\Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Tamiami Crossing U54I /SR951 I U 41 & East Access ! PM Background Traffic 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 V.92 V.0 u.rz 1 u.74 Volume Lek 0 0 47 0 14 0 an cSH 1700 1700 795 1700 114 376 Approach LOS Mel I Synchro 6 Report NG - 7118/2006 1: \Projeccs\ 808 \80874\Tmffic\Synchro\PMBKGD.sy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Tamiami Crossing US411.SR951 S4I & East Access PM ToW Traffic ._ __* -,t ♦ 4\ Grade 0% um vro 11111=110 111 11 , Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ri ht turn flare veh Volume Lek 0 0 140 0 82 0 cSH 1700 1700 774 1700 80 367 Approach LOS Avera Del 10.7 a a _ Analysis Period min IS Synchro 6 Report NG - 711812006 I: \Prolects\ 808\ 80874 \Traffic\Synchro \PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Lanes, Volumes, Timings Tamiami Crossing US41 /SR951 PM Total Traffic I US41 & East Access --► � ` f— 4\ Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/1812006 I:\ Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Tm fic\Synchro\PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP K� c.t oi�(�r x x9 d•1A, • 1 L � ti WA 1 1 1 1 1 1 %i:4Y fl��' 1 1 alr' =Slt ' G }rZt LLLttt .xLi +• 0 . t. i_i.r3z 7 a � •. a 11 11 11 11 �+11 Ii - i is l) „jdq F, = =r %3 .. • ... .aY.y t., .. W11- ,1. • .1 1 Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report NG - 7/1812006 I:\ Projects\ 808\ 80874 \Tm fic\Synchro\PMTOTALsy7 Vanasse & Daylor, LLP Topic # 625- 000 -015 May - 2005 Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways FIGURE 3 —13 TYPICAL STORAGE LANE Median Left Turn Storage Lane (Similar Arrangement For Right Turns) ,, Openin vL I v Taper Length � Braking Distance ' 1 � Queue 10' to 12' Storage Lane owilill' Through Lane Z4 _ _ I Through Lane y —Taper Or Reverse Curve StopControl Storaoe Queue Length - Unsignalized Intersections Turning Vehicles Per Hour 30 60 100 200 300 Required Storage Length (FEET) 25 50 100 175 250 At signalized intersections, the required queue length depends on the signal cycle length, the signal priesing arrangement, and rate of arrivals and departures of turning vehicles. In absence of a turning movement study, it is recommended that 100 ft. of queue length be provided in urban /suburban areas and 50 ft. of queue length be provided in rural /town areas as a minimum. Taper Length And Braking Distance (FEET) Highway Design Speed (MPH) Storage Entry Speed* (MPH) Taper Length Brake To Stop Urban ** Rural"* 35 25 70 75 — 40 30 80 75 — 45 35 85 100 — 50 40/44 105 135 215 55 48 125 — 260 60 52 145 - -- 310 65 55 170 - -- 350 * Reaction Precedes Entry ** Minimum Braking Distance, Wet Conditions * ** Customary Braking Distance, Wet Conditions The storage lane maybe in place of or In aaamon ro aeGBleraOUn rongui tact 0cuuui .�.�.��. Geometric Design 3 -92 Form 750. 0.01 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING- 17111 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY City: Naples Engineer: N.G. County: Collier County Date: July 19, 2006 Major Street: US 41 Lanes: 2 Critical Approach Speed: 45 Minor Street: East Access Lanes: 2 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km1h (40 mph) ? ❑Yes ❑ No 2. Is the intersection in a built -up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? O Yes ❑ No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes ", then use "70W volume level IF) 70% ❑ 100% WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR Applicable: O Yes ❑ No If all three criteria are fullf7lled or the plotted point lies above the appropriate line, Satisfied: O Yes ❑ No then the warrant is satisfed. Unusual condition justifying Approach Lanes use of warrant: 600 Delay Criteria' i 500 a n aoo Record hour when criteria are fulfilled and the corresponding delay or volume w z in boxes provided. a w a 3o0 ow zf g o 200 Peak our r u 100 Criteria 1. Delay on Minor Approach vehicle -hours Approach Lanes 1 1 2 Delay Criteria' 100 a Delay' 150 Fulfilled ?: ❑x Yes 2. Volume on Minor Approach '(vehicles per hour) Approach lanes 1 1 2 Volume Criteria' 100 150 Volume' 150 Fulfilled ?: ❑x Yes ❑ No Plot volume combination on the applicable figure below. FIGURE 4C -3: Criteria for "100V Volume Level 200 MOREtANES4 2 O MORE JAN a 2 ©R MORE JANF�S a 1 A1E 1 DANEA?4 EI •150 •100 V400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1800 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET • TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora mina street approach with time ornate lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold fora minorstreet approach with one lane. 500 aoo me I 200 3. Total Entering Volume `(vehicles per hour) No. of Approache Volume Criteria' E[:3No Volume' Fulfilled ?: ❑x Yes Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 451 too a FIGURE 4C-4: Criteria for "70a/; r Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 krNhr (40 mph) on Major Street) 2 OR MORE LANES a 2 OR MORE 2 O MORE LINES a 1 JANE 1LANEa1JANE '- 0 200 400 we 800 1000 1200 1400 .loo -75 'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two w mom lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold fora minor street approach with one lane.